<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Moscow Murders and More</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883</link><description><![CDATA[Moscow is a city located in northern Idaho, United States, with a population of approximately 25,000 people. It is the largest city and the county seat of Latah County. The city is situated in the Palouse region, known for its fertile soil and rolling hills, and is surrounded by wheat fields, forests, and mountains.Moscow is home to the University of Idaho, which is the state's flagship institution and a major research university. The university is a significant contributor to the local economy, and many businesses in the city are directly or indirectly tied to the university.<br /><br />The city also has a thriving arts and culture scene, with several galleries, museums, and performance venues.In terms of recreation, Moscow has several parks and outdoor recreation areas, including the Latah Trail, the Moscow Mountain Trail System, and the Palouse Divide Nordic Ski Area. The city also hosts several annual events, including the Moscow Farmers Market, the Lionel Hampton Jazz Festival, and the Renaissance Fair.<br /><br />However, things would change forever after Xana Kernodle, Ethan Chapin, Madison Mogen and Kaylee Goncalves were murdered in the early morning hours of November 13th, 2022. <br /><br />What followed in the wake of the murders captivated not only the nation but the whole world as the authorities scrambled to find the person responsible for the heinous crime. <br /><br />This podcast will document the Murders In Moscow from right after the murders were committed all the way through the real time evolution of the trial of the person that the authorities say is responsible, Bryan Kohberger.<br /><br />We will also cover other stories that are based in the world of true crime that are currently in the courts or that are headed that way.<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><atom:link href="https://www.spreaker.com/show/5852883/episodes/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><language>en</language><category>News Commentary</category><copyright>Bobby Capucci</copyright><lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 00:45:03 +0000</lastBuildDate><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:owner><itunes:name>Bobby Capucci</itunes:name><itunes:email>bobbycapucci@protonmail.com</itunes:email></itunes:owner><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Moscow is a city located in northern Idaho, United States, with a population of approximately 25,000 people. It is the largest city and the county seat of Latah County. The city is situated in the Palouse region, known for its fertile soil and rolling...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Moscow is a city located in northern Idaho, United States, with a population of approximately 25,000 people. It is the largest city and the county seat of Latah County. The city is situated in the Palouse region, known for its fertile soil and rolling hills, and is surrounded by wheat fields, forests, and mountains.Moscow is home to the University of Idaho, which is the state's flagship institution and a major research university. The university is a significant contributor to the local economy, and many businesses in the city are directly or indirectly tied to the university.<br /><br />The city also has a thriving arts and culture scene, with several galleries, museums, and performance venues.In terms of recreation, Moscow has several parks and outdoor recreation areas, including the Latah Trail, the Moscow Mountain Trail System, and the Palouse Divide Nordic Ski Area. The city also hosts several annual events, including the Moscow Farmers Market, the Lionel Hampton Jazz Festival, and the Renaissance Fair.<br /><br />However, things would change forever after Xana Kernodle, Ethan Chapin, Madison Mogen and Kaylee Goncalves were murdered in the early morning hours of November 13th, 2022. <br /><br />What followed in the wake of the murders captivated not only the nation but the whole world as the authorities scrambled to find the person responsible for the heinous crime. <br /><br />This podcast will document the Murders In Moscow from right after the murders were committed all the way through the real time evolution of the trial of the person that the authorities say is responsible, Bryan Kohberger.<br /><br />We will also cover other stories that are based in the world of true crime that are currently in the courts or that are headed that way.<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:category text="News"><itunes:category text="News Commentary"/></itunes:category><itunes:category text="True Crime"/><itunes:category text="News"><itunes:category text="Daily News"/></itunes:category><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type><podcast:funding url="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss">Support the podcast!</podcast:funding><item><title>Tyler Robinson Tells The Court That There Is Not Enough Evidence To Proceed To Trial (Part 2) (8/14/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-tells-the-court-that-there-is-not-enough-evidence-to-proceed-to-trial-part-2-8-14-26--73940416</link><description><![CDATA[Tyler Robinson’s defense filed its written bindover argument on August 11, 2026, responding to the state’s 28-page memorandum asking Judge Tony Graf to order Robinson to stand trial. The defense filing was submitted after the five-day preliminary hearing, during which Robinson’s lawyers challenged several important parts of the prosecution’s evidentiary presentation, particularly the reliability and interpretation of forensic evidence. During that hearing, the defense called FBI and ATF forensic witnesses and questioned the reliability and subjectivity of portions of the DNA analysis, while also emphasizing that Robinson had not emerged as an investigative suspect until he surrendered. The defense had previously highlighted the ATF finding that the bullet jacket fragment recovered during the autopsy could not be conclusively identified as having been fired from the rifle authorities linked to Robinson. Those issues formed the factual backdrop to the defense’s argument against bindover.<br /><br />The central defense position was that prosecutors were asking the court to move Robinson into a capital murder trial even though significant weaknesses remained in the evidence used to identify him as the shooter and connect the recovered weapon to the killing. That stood directly against the prosecution’s position that Robinson’s alleged admissions, DNA evidence, surveillance footage and witness testimony made the bindover determination exceptionally straightforward. Importantly, the dispute was not about whether the state had proven Robinson guilty beyond a reasonable doubt; Judge Graf was deciding whether prosecutors had presented probable cause sufficient to send the seven charges to trial, a considerably lower legal threshold. Robinson’s defense was therefore attempting to persuade Graf that weaknesses exposed during the preliminary hearing were substantial enough that the state had not satisfied even that standard, while prosecutors argued that Robinson’s alleged admissions and the corroborating forensic and video evidence easily cleared it. The state is scheduled to file its rebuttal on August 18, with oral arguments before Graf set for September 1.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73940416</guid><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 00:45:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73940416/tylerrobinsonrespondstobinding2.mp3" length="16740981" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/bb79132b-43be-4819-a6e6-029a58b8d1cd/bb79132b-43be-4819-a6e6-029a58b8d1cd.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/bb79132b-43be-4819-a6e6-029a58b8d1cd/bb79132b-43be-4819-a6e6-029a58b8d1cd.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/bb79132b-43be-4819-a6e6-029a58b8d1cd/bb79132b-43be-4819-a6e6-029a58b8d1cd.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Tyler Robinson’s defense filed its written bindover argument on August 11, 2026, responding to the state’s 28-page memorandum asking Judge Tony Graf to order Robinson to stand trial. The defense filing was submitted after the five-day preliminary...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Tyler Robinson’s defense filed its written bindover argument on August 11, 2026, responding to the state’s 28-page memorandum asking Judge Tony Graf to order Robinson to stand trial. The defense filing was submitted after the five-day preliminary hearing, during which Robinson’s lawyers challenged several important parts of the prosecution’s evidentiary presentation, particularly the reliability and interpretation of forensic evidence. During that hearing, the defense called FBI and ATF forensic witnesses and questioned the reliability and subjectivity of portions of the DNA analysis, while also emphasizing that Robinson had not emerged as an investigative suspect until he surrendered. The defense had previously highlighted the ATF finding that the bullet jacket fragment recovered during the autopsy could not be conclusively identified as having been fired from the rifle authorities linked to Robinson. Those issues formed the factual backdrop to the defense’s argument against bindover.<br /><br />The central defense position was that prosecutors were asking the court to move Robinson into a capital murder trial even though significant weaknesses remained in the evidence used to identify him as the shooter and connect the recovered weapon to the killing. That stood directly against the prosecution’s position that Robinson’s alleged admissions, DNA evidence, surveillance footage and witness testimony made the bindover determination exceptionally straightforward. Importantly, the dispute was not about whether the state had proven Robinson guilty beyond a reasonable doubt; Judge Graf was deciding whether prosecutors had presented probable cause sufficient to send the seven charges to trial, a considerably lower legal threshold. Robinson’s defense was therefore attempting to persuade Graf that weaknesses exposed during the preliminary hearing were substantial enough that the state had not satisfied even that standard, while prosecutors argued that Robinson’s alleged admissions and the corroborating forensic and video evidence easily cleared it. The state is scheduled to file its rebuttal on August 18, with oral arguments before Graf set for September 1.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1047</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvu</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The New Mexico Epstein Commission Interim Report (Part 16) (8/14/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-new-mexico-epstein-commission-interim-report-part-16-8-14-26--73940467</link><description><![CDATA[The New Mexico Survivors’ Truth Commission’s 119-page interim report described Zorro Ranch as a major and largely neglected component of Jeffrey Epstein’s broader operation, concluding that authorities failed for years to seriously investigate what happened there. According to the Commission, Epstein maintained an elaborate, highly controlled compound in New Mexico where survivors reported sexual abuse and where young women were routinely transported, housed and brought into Epstein’s orbit. The report pointed to witness testimony, flight records, seized electronic evidence and FBI material suggesting that Zorro Ranch was integrated into the same system of recruitment, secrecy and exploitation seen at Epstein’s other properties. Among the evidence discussed were computer folders labeled “ZORRO,” discs referencing nude photographs associated with the ranch, accounts of young women arriving by aircraft, efforts to impose restrictive nondisclosure agreements on workers, and survivor statements describing abuse in New Mexico. The Commission stressed that the evidence remained under review and that allegations involving individuals named in the report were not final findings of wrongdoing, but it said the existing record was already sufficient to show that Epstein’s activities in New Mexico deserved far more scrutiny than they ever received.<br /><br />The report was especially critical of institutional failures, saying New Mexico and federal authorities effectively passed responsibility to prosecutors elsewhere while Epstein’s conduct in the state went largely unexamined. It said the U.S. Attorney’s Office for New Mexico and state officials expected the Southern District of New York to handle Epstein, but New York prosecutors concentrated on crimes tied to New York and Florida rather than building a New Mexico case. Zorro Ranch was never searched while Epstein was alive and, according to the report, was not subjected to a comprehensive law-enforcement search until March 2026, nearly seven years after his death. The Commission concluded that this passivity allowed evidence to disappear, memories to fade and potential criminal cases to become more difficult or impossible to prosecute. It also opened separate lines of inquiry into Epstein’s financial dealings, his relationships with scientific institutions and wealthy associates, and the conduct of banks, including subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan. Its clearest interim observation was devastating: Epstein continued exercising wealth and influence after becoming a registered sex offender, operated much of his system in plain sight, and New Mexico law enforcement’s decision to rely on other jurisdictions left the conduct of Epstein and his co-conspirators in the state “unexamined and unpunished.” Final findings and recommendations were deferred while the Commission continued issuing subpoenas, interviewing witnesses and searching for additional survivors and potential perpetrators.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.nmlegis.gov/handouts/HISC%20080526%20Item%201%20Interim%20Report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">NM Survivors' Truth Commission — Interim Report</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73940467</guid><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73940467/nmreport16.mp3" length="15394316" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b1139b91-22b1-4a85-9e95-2219d6900ba9/b1139b91-22b1-4a85-9e95-2219d6900ba9.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b1139b91-22b1-4a85-9e95-2219d6900ba9/b1139b91-22b1-4a85-9e95-2219d6900ba9.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b1139b91-22b1-4a85-9e95-2219d6900ba9/b1139b91-22b1-4a85-9e95-2219d6900ba9.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The New Mexico Survivors’ Truth Commission’s 119-page interim report described Zorro Ranch as a major and largely neglected component of Jeffrey Epstein’s broader operation, concluding that authorities failed for years to seriously investigate what...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The New Mexico Survivors’ Truth Commission’s 119-page interim report described Zorro Ranch as a major and largely neglected component of Jeffrey Epstein’s broader operation, concluding that authorities failed for years to seriously investigate what happened there. According to the Commission, Epstein maintained an elaborate, highly controlled compound in New Mexico where survivors reported sexual abuse and where young women were routinely transported, housed and brought into Epstein’s orbit. The report pointed to witness testimony, flight records, seized electronic evidence and FBI material suggesting that Zorro Ranch was integrated into the same system of recruitment, secrecy and exploitation seen at Epstein’s other properties. Among the evidence discussed were computer folders labeled “ZORRO,” discs referencing nude photographs associated with the ranch, accounts of young women arriving by aircraft, efforts to impose restrictive nondisclosure agreements on workers, and survivor statements describing abuse in New Mexico. The Commission stressed that the evidence remained under review and that allegations involving individuals named in the report were not final findings of wrongdoing, but it said the existing record was already sufficient to show that Epstein’s activities in New Mexico deserved far more scrutiny than they ever received.<br /><br />The report was especially critical of institutional failures, saying New Mexico and federal authorities effectively passed responsibility to prosecutors elsewhere while Epstein’s conduct in the state went largely unexamined. It said the U.S. Attorney’s Office for New Mexico and state officials expected the Southern District of New York to handle Epstein, but New York prosecutors concentrated on crimes tied to New York and Florida rather than building a New Mexico case. Zorro Ranch was never searched while Epstein was alive and, according to the report, was not subjected to a comprehensive law-enforcement search until March 2026, nearly seven years after his death. The Commission concluded that this passivity allowed evidence to disappear, memories to fade and potential criminal cases to become more difficult or impossible to prosecute. It also opened separate lines of inquiry into Epstein’s financial dealings, his relationships with scientific institutions and wealthy associates, and the conduct of banks, including subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan. Its clearest interim observation was devastating: Epstein continued exercising wealth and influence after becoming a registered sex offender, operated much of his system in plain sight, and New Mexico law enforcement’s decision to rely on other jurisdictions left the conduct of Epstein and his co-conspirators in the state “unexamined and unpunished.” Final findings and recommendations were deferred while the Commission continued issuing subpoenas, interviewing witnesses and searching for additional survivors and potential perpetrators.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.nmlegis.gov/handouts/HISC%20080526%20Item%201%20Interim%20Report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">NM Survivors' Truth Commission — Interim Report</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>963</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The New Mexico Epstein Commission Interim Report (Part 15) (8/14/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-new-mexico-epstein-commission-interim-report-part-15-8-14-26--73940466</link><description><![CDATA[The New Mexico Survivors’ Truth Commission’s 119-page interim report described Zorro Ranch as a major and largely neglected component of Jeffrey Epstein’s broader operation, concluding that authorities failed for years to seriously investigate what happened there. According to the Commission, Epstein maintained an elaborate, highly controlled compound in New Mexico where survivors reported sexual abuse and where young women were routinely transported, housed and brought into Epstein’s orbit. The report pointed to witness testimony, flight records, seized electronic evidence and FBI material suggesting that Zorro Ranch was integrated into the same system of recruitment, secrecy and exploitation seen at Epstein’s other properties. Among the evidence discussed were computer folders labeled “ZORRO,” discs referencing nude photographs associated with the ranch, accounts of young women arriving by aircraft, efforts to impose restrictive nondisclosure agreements on workers, and survivor statements describing abuse in New Mexico. The Commission stressed that the evidence remained under review and that allegations involving individuals named in the report were not final findings of wrongdoing, but it said the existing record was already sufficient to show that Epstein’s activities in New Mexico deserved far more scrutiny than they ever received.<br /><br />The report was especially critical of institutional failures, saying New Mexico and federal authorities effectively passed responsibility to prosecutors elsewhere while Epstein’s conduct in the state went largely unexamined. It said the U.S. Attorney’s Office for New Mexico and state officials expected the Southern District of New York to handle Epstein, but New York prosecutors concentrated on crimes tied to New York and Florida rather than building a New Mexico case. Zorro Ranch was never searched while Epstein was alive and, according to the report, was not subjected to a comprehensive law-enforcement search until March 2026, nearly seven years after his death. The Commission concluded that this passivity allowed evidence to disappear, memories to fade and potential criminal cases to become more difficult or impossible to prosecute. It also opened separate lines of inquiry into Epstein’s financial dealings, his relationships with scientific institutions and wealthy associates, and the conduct of banks, including subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan. Its clearest interim observation was devastating: Epstein continued exercising wealth and influence after becoming a registered sex offender, operated much of his system in plain sight, and New Mexico law enforcement’s decision to rely on other jurisdictions left the conduct of Epstein and his co-conspirators in the state “unexamined and unpunished.” Final findings and recommendations were deferred while the Commission continued issuing subpoenas, interviewing witnesses and searching for additional survivors and potential perpetrators.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.nmlegis.gov/handouts/HISC%20080526%20Item%201%20Interim%20Report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">NM Survivors' Truth Commission — Interim Report</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73940466</guid><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73940466/nmreport15.mp3" length="11682003" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/87f8b11e-04c9-4bc1-a9d8-53333c5deda9/87f8b11e-04c9-4bc1-a9d8-53333c5deda9.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/87f8b11e-04c9-4bc1-a9d8-53333c5deda9/87f8b11e-04c9-4bc1-a9d8-53333c5deda9.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/87f8b11e-04c9-4bc1-a9d8-53333c5deda9/87f8b11e-04c9-4bc1-a9d8-53333c5deda9.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The New Mexico Survivors’ Truth Commission’s 119-page interim report described Zorro Ranch as a major and largely neglected component of Jeffrey Epstein’s broader operation, concluding that authorities failed for years to seriously investigate what...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The New Mexico Survivors’ Truth Commission’s 119-page interim report described Zorro Ranch as a major and largely neglected component of Jeffrey Epstein’s broader operation, concluding that authorities failed for years to seriously investigate what happened there. According to the Commission, Epstein maintained an elaborate, highly controlled compound in New Mexico where survivors reported sexual abuse and where young women were routinely transported, housed and brought into Epstein’s orbit. The report pointed to witness testimony, flight records, seized electronic evidence and FBI material suggesting that Zorro Ranch was integrated into the same system of recruitment, secrecy and exploitation seen at Epstein’s other properties. Among the evidence discussed were computer folders labeled “ZORRO,” discs referencing nude photographs associated with the ranch, accounts of young women arriving by aircraft, efforts to impose restrictive nondisclosure agreements on workers, and survivor statements describing abuse in New Mexico. The Commission stressed that the evidence remained under review and that allegations involving individuals named in the report were not final findings of wrongdoing, but it said the existing record was already sufficient to show that Epstein’s activities in New Mexico deserved far more scrutiny than they ever received.<br /><br />The report was especially critical of institutional failures, saying New Mexico and federal authorities effectively passed responsibility to prosecutors elsewhere while Epstein’s conduct in the state went largely unexamined. It said the U.S. Attorney’s Office for New Mexico and state officials expected the Southern District of New York to handle Epstein, but New York prosecutors concentrated on crimes tied to New York and Florida rather than building a New Mexico case. Zorro Ranch was never searched while Epstein was alive and, according to the report, was not subjected to a comprehensive law-enforcement search until March 2026, nearly seven years after his death. The Commission concluded that this passivity allowed evidence to disappear, memories to fade and potential criminal cases to become more difficult or impossible to prosecute. It also opened separate lines of inquiry into Epstein’s financial dealings, his relationships with scientific institutions and wealthy associates, and the conduct of banks, including subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan. Its clearest interim observation was devastating: Epstein continued exercising wealth and influence after becoming a registered sex offender, operated much of his system in plain sight, and New Mexico law enforcement’s decision to rely on other jurisdictions left the conduct of Epstein and his co-conspirators in the state “unexamined and unpunished.” Final findings and recommendations were deferred while the Commission continued issuing subpoenas, interviewing witnesses and searching for additional survivors and potential perpetrators.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.nmlegis.gov/handouts/HISC%20080526%20Item%201%20Interim%20Report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">NM Survivors' Truth Commission — Interim Report</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>731</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Murder In Moscow:  Kaylee Goncalves’ Parents Renew Their Call for the Death Penalty (8/14/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-kaylee-goncalves-parents-renew-their-call-for-the-death-penalty-8-14-26--73998609</link><description><![CDATA[Kaylee Goncalves’ parents, Kristi and Steve Goncalves, described how the murders continued to dominate their lives years after their daughter and three other University of Idaho students were killed in November 2022. Kristi said thoughts of Kaylee and the killings were often the first thing she experienced when waking up each morning, while Steve described how his wife went to sleep hoping Kaylee would appear in her dreams so she could speak to her again. They said the grief had become part of their daily existence even after Bryan Kohberger pleaded guilty in July 2025 to four counts of first-degree murder and one count of felony burglary and received four consecutive life sentences without parole.<br /><br />Kohberger’s subsequent effort to withdraw his guilty plea reopened the legal battle and, for the Goncalves family, also revived the possibility that prosecutors could once again pursue the death penalty. Kohberger argued in his post-conviction challenge that he received ineffective assistance of counsel, was manipulated into accepting the plea agreement and had been led to believe the deal would result in better prison conditions, while also maintaining his innocence. Although the renewed proceedings meant another painful chapter for the family, Kristi Goncalves said she viewed the development as a potential second opportunity to obtain the punishment the family had originally wanted, expressing hope that the case could ultimately return to a death-penalty prosecution.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.foxnews.com/media/parents-idaho-massacre-victim-face-daily-nightmare-demanding-death-penalty-shock-plea-twist" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Kaylee Goncalves parents open up as Kohberger seeks plea withdrawal | Fox News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73998609</guid><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 18:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73998609/goncalveshannityinterview.mp3" length="10190306" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7ecd9aae-9253-4bb5-b25b-3f44ac06fe47/7ecd9aae-9253-4bb5-b25b-3f44ac06fe47.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7ecd9aae-9253-4bb5-b25b-3f44ac06fe47/7ecd9aae-9253-4bb5-b25b-3f44ac06fe47.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7ecd9aae-9253-4bb5-b25b-3f44ac06fe47/7ecd9aae-9253-4bb5-b25b-3f44ac06fe47.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Kaylee Goncalves’ parents, Kristi and Steve Goncalves, described how the murders continued to dominate their lives years after their daughter and three other University of Idaho students were killed in November 2022. Kristi said thoughts of Kaylee and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Kaylee Goncalves’ parents, Kristi and Steve Goncalves, described how the murders continued to dominate their lives years after their daughter and three other University of Idaho students were killed in November 2022. Kristi said thoughts of Kaylee and the killings were often the first thing she experienced when waking up each morning, while Steve described how his wife went to sleep hoping Kaylee would appear in her dreams so she could speak to her again. They said the grief had become part of their daily existence even after Bryan Kohberger pleaded guilty in July 2025 to four counts of first-degree murder and one count of felony burglary and received four consecutive life sentences without parole.<br /><br />Kohberger’s subsequent effort to withdraw his guilty plea reopened the legal battle and, for the Goncalves family, also revived the possibility that prosecutors could once again pursue the death penalty. Kohberger argued in his post-conviction challenge that he received ineffective assistance of counsel, was manipulated into accepting the plea agreement and had been led to believe the deal would result in better prison conditions, while also maintaining his innocence. Although the renewed proceedings meant another painful chapter for the family, Kristi Goncalves said she viewed the development as a potential second opportunity to obtain the punishment the family had originally wanted, expressing hope that the case could ultimately return to a death-penalty prosecution.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.foxnews.com/media/parents-idaho-massacre-victim-face-daily-nightmare-demanding-death-penalty-shock-plea-twist" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Kaylee Goncalves parents open up as Kohberger seeks plea withdrawal | Fox News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>637</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Federal Gun Violation That Should Have Put Epstein’s NPA Back Under the Microscope (8/14/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-federal-gun-violation-that-should-have-put-epstein-s-npa-back-under-the-microscope-8-14-26--73940418</link><description><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein was reportedly in possession of firearms at his Zorro Ranch in New Mexico even after his 2008 Florida felony conviction, raising questions about why he was never prosecuted for what authorities themselves had identified as potentially illegal gun possession. The New Mexico Survivors’ Truth Commission cited documentation indicating that Epstein maintained control over firearms at the ranch after becoming a convicted felon. A July 2009 policy concerning security at Epstein’s properties specifically noted his felony status and acknowledged that federal law prohibited convicted felons from knowingly possessing firearms or ammunition. The commission also reported that Epstein had weapons spread across multiple properties, including residences in Florida and the U.S. Virgin Islands, and that he had previously held a concealed-carry license.<br /><br />The records suggested Epstein was well aware that his conviction created problems for his ability to legally possess guns. In 2014, he emailed attorney Erika Kellerhals asking whether his civil rights could be restored so that he could own a firearm, and she reportedly told him that he could not and instead suggested hiring armed security. Other records indicated that Epstein closely tracked where weapons were stored and had previously instructed employees regarding firearms at his properties. The revelations add another unanswered question to Epstein’s post-conviction treatment: despite documentation suggesting that authorities knew a convicted felon continued to exercise control over firearms, there was apparently no resulting federal firearms prosecution before his 2019 arrest on sex-trafficking charges.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://radaronline.com/p/epstein-committed-federal-crime-possession-firearms-zorro-ranch-conviction/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein Was in 'Possession of Firearms' Even After 2008 Conviction</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73940418</guid><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 16:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73940418/epsteinnpagunviolationnm.mp3" length="10564380" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b3aba248-d754-42da-8b4f-bc7d43cfef09/b3aba248-d754-42da-8b4f-bc7d43cfef09.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b3aba248-d754-42da-8b4f-bc7d43cfef09/b3aba248-d754-42da-8b4f-bc7d43cfef09.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b3aba248-d754-42da-8b4f-bc7d43cfef09/b3aba248-d754-42da-8b4f-bc7d43cfef09.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jeffrey Epstein was reportedly in possession of firearms at his Zorro Ranch in New Mexico even after his 2008 Florida felony conviction, raising questions about why he was never prosecuted for what authorities themselves had identified as potentially...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein was reportedly in possession of firearms at his Zorro Ranch in New Mexico even after his 2008 Florida felony conviction, raising questions about why he was never prosecuted for what authorities themselves had identified as potentially illegal gun possession. The New Mexico Survivors’ Truth Commission cited documentation indicating that Epstein maintained control over firearms at the ranch after becoming a convicted felon. A July 2009 policy concerning security at Epstein’s properties specifically noted his felony status and acknowledged that federal law prohibited convicted felons from knowingly possessing firearms or ammunition. The commission also reported that Epstein had weapons spread across multiple properties, including residences in Florida and the U.S. Virgin Islands, and that he had previously held a concealed-carry license.<br /><br />The records suggested Epstein was well aware that his conviction created problems for his ability to legally possess guns. In 2014, he emailed attorney Erika Kellerhals asking whether his civil rights could be restored so that he could own a firearm, and she reportedly told him that he could not and instead suggested hiring armed security. Other records indicated that Epstein closely tracked where weapons were stored and had previously instructed employees regarding firearms at his properties. The revelations add another unanswered question to Epstein’s post-conviction treatment: despite documentation suggesting that authorities knew a convicted felon continued to exercise control over firearms, there was apparently no resulting federal firearms prosecution before his 2019 arrest on sex-trafficking charges.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://radaronline.com/p/epstein-committed-federal-crime-possession-firearms-zorro-ranch-conviction/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein Was in 'Possession of Firearms' Even After 2008 Conviction</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>661</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Epstein Survivors Push Britain to Oppose Any Maxwell Pardon (8/14/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/epstein-survivors-push-britain-to-oppose-any-maxwell-pardon-8-14-26--73940417</link><description><![CDATA[Epstein survivor Lara Blume McGee urged British Prime Minister Andy Burnham to directly press President Donald Trump not to pardon Ghislaine Maxwell, saying the possibility of clemency for the woman she accused of grooming her was deeply disturbing. McGee said Maxwell began grooming her when she was 20 and argued that Britain had a responsibility to speak forcefully because Maxwell is a British citizen. Attorney Spencer Kuvin, who has represented multiple Epstein survivors, echoed that demand and said Burnham should make clear to the Trump administration that freeing Maxwell would have consequences far beyond American politics. Their concerns were heightened by Trump’s refusal to categorically rule out a pardon and by Maxwell’s lawyers suggesting that she would cooperate more fully with investigations into Epstein’s crimes if she received clemency. Survivors viewed that possibility as an unacceptable bargain in which the person convicted of helping Epstein abuse young women and girls could potentially trade information for her freedom.<br /><br />The article also placed the pardon controversy within the broader political fight surrounding Maxwell’s treatment by the Justice Department. Survivors remained angry over her transfer to a minimum-security federal prison after lengthy meetings with Todd Blanche and feared that the favorable treatment could ultimately culminate in clemency. Kuvin argued that a pardon would send a devastating message to trafficking survivors by suggesting that a convicted accomplice could receive special consideration because she possessed information about powerful people. The pressure on Burnham also came after the U.S. Senate unanimously passed a nonbinding resolution opposing any presidential pardon or clemency for Maxwell, demonstrating unusually broad political opposition to the idea. McGee and other survivors were therefore calling on the British government to add its voice to that opposition and to support a wider independent inquiry into Epstein, Maxwell and anyone else credibly implicated in their crimes.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://metro.co.uk/2026/08/12/andy-burnham-needs-tell-trump-not-pardon-groomer-ghislaine-maxwell-29349815/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">'Andy Burnham needs to tell Trump not to pardon my groomer Ghislaine Maxwell' | News Politics | Metro News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73940417</guid><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73940417/ukburnhamnopardonformaxwell.mp3" length="10725712" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f025dc28-3740-4ae9-add8-04cef52a6fa3/f025dc28-3740-4ae9-add8-04cef52a6fa3.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f025dc28-3740-4ae9-add8-04cef52a6fa3/f025dc28-3740-4ae9-add8-04cef52a6fa3.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f025dc28-3740-4ae9-add8-04cef52a6fa3/f025dc28-3740-4ae9-add8-04cef52a6fa3.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Epstein survivor Lara Blume McGee urged British Prime Minister Andy Burnham to directly press President Donald Trump not to pardon Ghislaine Maxwell, saying the possibility of clemency for the woman she accused of grooming her was deeply disturbing....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Epstein survivor Lara Blume McGee urged British Prime Minister Andy Burnham to directly press President Donald Trump not to pardon Ghislaine Maxwell, saying the possibility of clemency for the woman she accused of grooming her was deeply disturbing. McGee said Maxwell began grooming her when she was 20 and argued that Britain had a responsibility to speak forcefully because Maxwell is a British citizen. Attorney Spencer Kuvin, who has represented multiple Epstein survivors, echoed that demand and said Burnham should make clear to the Trump administration that freeing Maxwell would have consequences far beyond American politics. Their concerns were heightened by Trump’s refusal to categorically rule out a pardon and by Maxwell’s lawyers suggesting that she would cooperate more fully with investigations into Epstein’s crimes if she received clemency. Survivors viewed that possibility as an unacceptable bargain in which the person convicted of helping Epstein abuse young women and girls could potentially trade information for her freedom.<br /><br />The article also placed the pardon controversy within the broader political fight surrounding Maxwell’s treatment by the Justice Department. Survivors remained angry over her transfer to a minimum-security federal prison after lengthy meetings with Todd Blanche and feared that the favorable treatment could ultimately culminate in clemency. Kuvin argued that a pardon would send a devastating message to trafficking survivors by suggesting that a convicted accomplice could receive special consideration because she possessed information about powerful people. The pressure on Burnham also came after the U.S. Senate unanimously passed a nonbinding resolution opposing any presidential pardon or clemency for Maxwell, demonstrating unusually broad political opposition to the idea. McGee and other survivors were therefore calling on the British government to add its voice to that opposition and to support a wider independent inquiry into Epstein, Maxwell and anyone else credibly implicated in their crimes.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://metro.co.uk/2026/08/12/andy-burnham-needs-tell-trump-not-pardon-groomer-ghislaine-maxwell-29349815/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">'Andy Burnham needs to tell Trump not to pardon my groomer Ghislaine Maxwell' | News Politics | Metro News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>671</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Gap Between Marsha Blackburn’s Epstein Rhetoric and Her Actions (8/14/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-gap-between-marsha-blackburn-s-epstein-rhetoric-and-her-actions-8-14-26--73940419</link><description><![CDATA[Sen. Marsha Blackburn had repeatedly presented herself publicly as an advocate for transparency surrounding Jeffrey Epstein, while Sen. Ron Wyden’s investigation showed that she declined opportunities to help obtain precisely the financial records that could have shed more light on Epstein’s operation. Beginning in 2024, Wyden’s office reportedly approached Blackburn multiple times seeking her support for efforts to compel the release of Epstein-related suspicious activity reports and other banking records. When Treasury officials resisted Wyden’s requests, he eventually pursued legislation that would force production of the material. According to the reporting, Blackburn’s office never gave Wyden a clear commitment and did not respond affirmatively to a direct request that she co-sponsor the legislation, despite Blackburn continuing to publicly criticize others for supposedly obstructing Epstein transparency.<br /><br />That contradiction was the heart of the story: Blackburn’s public rhetoric about exposing the Epstein scandal was being measured against what she actually did when presented with a concrete opportunity to assist a major congressional investigation. Wyden’s investigation ultimately uncovered extensive evidence concerning Epstein’s financial relationships and alleged compliance failures at JPMorgan, Deutsche Bank and Bank of America, making the records he sought potentially important to understanding how Epstein moved money and how financial institutions responded to warning signs surrounding him. The Banner’s reporting therefore raised the question of whether Blackburn’s highly visible demands for Epstein accountability were matched by meaningful action behind the scenes, or whether she was willing to campaign on transparency while declining to support one of the most substantial efforts in Congress to follow Epstein’s money.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://nashvillebanner.com/2026/08/13/marsha-blackburn-jeffrey-epstein-ron-wyden-report/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Report alleges Blackburn refused to help with Epstein probe - Nashville Banner</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73940419</guid><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 12:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73940419/blackburncalledoutwydenreport.mp3" length="10696455" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/687057f9-bee9-4a35-bcef-496329c0b2bf/687057f9-bee9-4a35-bcef-496329c0b2bf.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/687057f9-bee9-4a35-bcef-496329c0b2bf/687057f9-bee9-4a35-bcef-496329c0b2bf.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/687057f9-bee9-4a35-bcef-496329c0b2bf/687057f9-bee9-4a35-bcef-496329c0b2bf.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Sen. Marsha Blackburn had repeatedly presented herself publicly as an advocate for transparency surrounding Jeffrey Epstein, while Sen. Ron Wyden’s investigation showed that she declined opportunities to help obtain precisely the financial records...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Sen. Marsha Blackburn had repeatedly presented herself publicly as an advocate for transparency surrounding Jeffrey Epstein, while Sen. Ron Wyden’s investigation showed that she declined opportunities to help obtain precisely the financial records that could have shed more light on Epstein’s operation. Beginning in 2024, Wyden’s office reportedly approached Blackburn multiple times seeking her support for efforts to compel the release of Epstein-related suspicious activity reports and other banking records. When Treasury officials resisted Wyden’s requests, he eventually pursued legislation that would force production of the material. According to the reporting, Blackburn’s office never gave Wyden a clear commitment and did not respond affirmatively to a direct request that she co-sponsor the legislation, despite Blackburn continuing to publicly criticize others for supposedly obstructing Epstein transparency.<br /><br />That contradiction was the heart of the story: Blackburn’s public rhetoric about exposing the Epstein scandal was being measured against what she actually did when presented with a concrete opportunity to assist a major congressional investigation. Wyden’s investigation ultimately uncovered extensive evidence concerning Epstein’s financial relationships and alleged compliance failures at JPMorgan, Deutsche Bank and Bank of America, making the records he sought potentially important to understanding how Epstein moved money and how financial institutions responded to warning signs surrounding him. The Banner’s reporting therefore raised the question of whether Blackburn’s highly visible demands for Epstein accountability were matched by meaningful action behind the scenes, or whether she was willing to campaign on transparency while declining to support one of the most substantial efforts in Congress to follow Epstein’s money.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://nashvillebanner.com/2026/08/13/marsha-blackburn-jeffrey-epstein-ron-wyden-report/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Report alleges Blackburn refused to help with Epstein probe - Nashville Banner</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>669</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The State Responds To The Kohberger Bushy Eyebrow Motion (8/14/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-state-responds-to-the-kohberger-bushy-eyebrow-motion-8-14-26--73922113</link><description><![CDATA[​In the case of State v. Bryan Kohberger, the defense filed Motion in Limine #7, seeking to exclude witness identification based on the description of "bushy eyebrows." The defense argued that the surviving roommate's (identified as D.M.) description was unreliable due to her limited observation under distressing conditions, potential impairment from alcohol, and the generic nature of the "bushy eyebrows" characteristic, which could apply to many individuals. They contended that admitting this description could unfairly prejudice the jury against Kohberger.<br /><br />In response, the prosecution opposed the motion, asserting that D.M.'s consistent description of the intruder's "bushy eyebrows" was both relevant and reliable. They emphasized that D.M. consistently provided this specific detail across multiple interviews, and that such a distinctive feature could assist in identifying the perpetrator. The prosecution also highlighted that a photograph of Kohberger, taken shortly after the incident, depicted him with prominent eyebrows, supporting the witness's account. They argued that the determination of whether Kohberger's eyebrows match the description should be left to the jury.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/031725-States-Response-Defendants-MiL-7-RE-Witness-Identification-Bushy-Eyebrows.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">031725-States-Response-Defendants-MiL-7-RE-Witness-Identification-Bushy-Eyebrows.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73922113</guid><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73922113/megastatebushyeyebrows.mp3" length="40423384" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0d9d1c58-fecb-49a8-88a1-5c5f938920f5/0d9d1c58-fecb-49a8-88a1-5c5f938920f5.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0d9d1c58-fecb-49a8-88a1-5c5f938920f5/0d9d1c58-fecb-49a8-88a1-5c5f938920f5.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0d9d1c58-fecb-49a8-88a1-5c5f938920f5/0d9d1c58-fecb-49a8-88a1-5c5f938920f5.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>​In the case of State v. Bryan Kohberger, the defense filed Motion in Limine #7, seeking to exclude witness identification based on the description of "bushy eyebrows." The defense argued that the surviving roommate's (identified as D.M.) description...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[​In the case of State v. Bryan Kohberger, the defense filed Motion in Limine #7, seeking to exclude witness identification based on the description of "bushy eyebrows." The defense argued that the surviving roommate's (identified as D.M.) description was unreliable due to her limited observation under distressing conditions, potential impairment from alcohol, and the generic nature of the "bushy eyebrows" characteristic, which could apply to many individuals. They contended that admitting this description could unfairly prejudice the jury against Kohberger.<br /><br />In response, the prosecution opposed the motion, asserting that D.M.'s consistent description of the intruder's "bushy eyebrows" was both relevant and reliable. They emphasized that D.M. consistently provided this specific detail across multiple interviews, and that such a distinctive feature could assist in identifying the perpetrator. The prosecution also highlighted that a photograph of Kohberger, taken shortly after the incident, depicted him with prominent eyebrows, supporting the witness's account. They argued that the determination of whether Kohberger's eyebrows match the description should be left to the jury.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/031725-States-Response-Defendants-MiL-7-RE-Witness-Identification-Bushy-Eyebrows.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">031725-States-Response-Defendants-MiL-7-RE-Witness-Identification-Bushy-Eyebrows.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2527</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Bryan Kohberger And the Youth Police Program He Was Removed From (8/14/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-the-youth-police-program-he-was-removed-from-8-14-26--73921838</link><description><![CDATA[Bryan Kohberger had participated in a law-enforcement vocational program while attending high school in Pennsylvania, but his involvement reportedly ended after he became the subject of an internal investigation. A former school administrator said Kohberger had initially been interested in pursuing a career in law enforcement and enrolled in the Monroe Career and Technical Institute’s protective-services program, which gave students exposure to policing and related fields. According to the administrator, however, an incident occurred that resulted in Kohberger being investigated and ultimately removed from the program. The precise details of what happened were not publicly disclosed because Kohberger had been a minor at the time, but the administrator confirmed that the matter had been serious enough to end his participation in the law-enforcement track.<br /><br />After being removed from the program, Kohberger reportedly switched his focus to heating, ventilation and air-conditioning studies before later returning to an academic interest in criminal justice and criminology. The revelation became notable after his arrest for the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin because it showed that Kohberger’s fascination with law enforcement and criminal behavior had stretched back to his teenage years, while also revealing that his earliest attempt to enter a police-oriented training environment had ended under questionable circumstances. Because school officials were restricted from discussing the underlying juvenile matter, the specific conduct that prompted the investigation remained unclear, leaving another unresolved piece of Kohberger’s background from years before the Moscow murders.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73921838</guid><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73921838/megakohbergerremovedprogramfishmongerjob.mp3" length="35080194" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0dacbcc9-92a6-4b4e-ab70-fe71345b9b48/0dacbcc9-92a6-4b4e-ab70-fe71345b9b48.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0dacbcc9-92a6-4b4e-ab70-fe71345b9b48/0dacbcc9-92a6-4b4e-ab70-fe71345b9b48.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0dacbcc9-92a6-4b4e-ab70-fe71345b9b48/0dacbcc9-92a6-4b4e-ab70-fe71345b9b48.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Bryan Kohberger had participated in a law-enforcement vocational program while attending high school in Pennsylvania, but his involvement reportedly ended after he became the subject of an internal investigation. A former school administrator said...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Bryan Kohberger had participated in a law-enforcement vocational program while attending high school in Pennsylvania, but his involvement reportedly ended after he became the subject of an internal investigation. A former school administrator said Kohberger had initially been interested in pursuing a career in law enforcement and enrolled in the Monroe Career and Technical Institute’s protective-services program, which gave students exposure to policing and related fields. According to the administrator, however, an incident occurred that resulted in Kohberger being investigated and ultimately removed from the program. The precise details of what happened were not publicly disclosed because Kohberger had been a minor at the time, but the administrator confirmed that the matter had been serious enough to end his participation in the law-enforcement track.<br /><br />After being removed from the program, Kohberger reportedly switched his focus to heating, ventilation and air-conditioning studies before later returning to an academic interest in criminal justice and criminology. The revelation became notable after his arrest for the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin because it showed that Kohberger’s fascination with law enforcement and criminal behavior had stretched back to his teenage years, while also revealing that his earliest attempt to enter a police-oriented training environment had ended under questionable circumstances. Because school officials were restricted from discussing the underlying juvenile matter, the specific conduct that prompted the investigation remained unclear, leaving another unresolved piece of Kohberger’s background from years before the Moscow murders.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2193</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Bryan Kohberger And The Raid On His Pullman Apartment (8/14/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-the-raid-on-his-pullman-apartment-8-14-26--73921837</link><description><![CDATA[<br />Law enforcement officers raided Bryan Kohberger’s apartment in Pullman, Washington, shortly after his December 30, 2022 arrest in Pennsylvania, searching for evidence that could connect him to the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. Investigators executed a search warrant at his residence at Washington State University, where Kohberger had been a graduate student in criminology. The search focused on potential forensic evidence, clothing, electronic devices, documents and other items that might help reconstruct his movements and determine whether anything from the King Road crime scene had been brought back to his apartment.<br /><br />The search later became significant because authorities disclosed that they had collected a number of items from the apartment, including possible biological material, dark-colored clothing, gloves, electronics and other evidence for further testing. Investigators also examined Kohberger’s computer and digital devices as they worked to establish his activities before and after the killings. The raid formed part of a much broader evidence-gathering effort that included searches of his office, vehicle and family home in Pennsylvania, as prosecutors attempted to build a circumstantial and forensic case linking Kohberger to the Moscow murders.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73921837</guid><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73921837/megakohbergerraidpullman.mp3" length="30826623" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/831bee03-7a36-4c12-a077-50f735d27c2a/831bee03-7a36-4c12-a077-50f735d27c2a.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/831bee03-7a36-4c12-a077-50f735d27c2a/831bee03-7a36-4c12-a077-50f735d27c2a.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/831bee03-7a36-4c12-a077-50f735d27c2a/831bee03-7a36-4c12-a077-50f735d27c2a.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Law enforcement officers raided Bryan Kohberger’s apartment in Pullman, Washington, shortly after his December 30, 2022 arrest in Pennsylvania, searching for evidence that could connect him to the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br />Law enforcement officers raided Bryan Kohberger’s apartment in Pullman, Washington, shortly after his December 30, 2022 arrest in Pennsylvania, searching for evidence that could connect him to the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. Investigators executed a search warrant at his residence at Washington State University, where Kohberger had been a graduate student in criminology. The search focused on potential forensic evidence, clothing, electronic devices, documents and other items that might help reconstruct his movements and determine whether anything from the King Road crime scene had been brought back to his apartment.<br /><br />The search later became significant because authorities disclosed that they had collected a number of items from the apartment, including possible biological material, dark-colored clothing, gloves, electronics and other evidence for further testing. Investigators also examined Kohberger’s computer and digital devices as they worked to establish his activities before and after the killings. The raid formed part of a much broader evidence-gathering effort that included searches of his office, vehicle and family home in Pennsylvania, as prosecutors attempted to build a circumstantial and forensic case linking Kohberger to the Moscow murders.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1927</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>More From The Driver Who Drove Kaylee And Madison Home That Fateful Night</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/more-from-the-driver-who-drove-kaylee-and-madison-home-that-fateful-night--73921184</link><description><![CDATA[<br />The private driver who took Kaylee Goncalves and Madison Mogen back to their King Road home in the early hours of November 13, 2022, said the final ride had appeared completely normal at the time but weighed heavily on him after he learned the two women had been murdered. Goncalves and Mogen had spent the evening in downtown Moscow, stopped at a food truck and then received a ride home from the driver, arriving at the residence shortly before 2 a.m. He said there had been nothing about their behavior or the trip that had raised alarms, and he had seen no obvious sign that the women were in danger. In the aftermath, however, he repeatedly thought about the ride and the fact that he had been one of the last people known to have seen them alive. Police investigated the driver early in the case and determined that he was not believed to have been involved in the killings.<br /><br />The driver also described how unsettling the atmosphere in Moscow had become while the murders remained unsolved, with fear, rumors and online speculation spreading throughout the community. He said he had cooperated with investigators and provided information about his movements after dropping Goncalves and Mogen off, while authorities worked to reconstruct the victims’ final hours. At that stage of the investigation, police were still trying to account for portions of the victims’ timelines and determine who had entered the King Road residence before Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin were found stabbed to death. The driver’s account ultimately reinforced one of the most haunting aspects of the case at the time: Goncalves and Mogen had apparently made it home safely after an ordinary night out, with no indication during their ride that they were only hours away from being murdered.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73921184</guid><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73921184/driverweighsin.mp3" length="12677581" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3ca70f22-3fbf-4d79-8024-bd6653c0fc94/3ca70f22-3fbf-4d79-8024-bd6653c0fc94.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3ca70f22-3fbf-4d79-8024-bd6653c0fc94/3ca70f22-3fbf-4d79-8024-bd6653c0fc94.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3ca70f22-3fbf-4d79-8024-bd6653c0fc94/3ca70f22-3fbf-4d79-8024-bd6653c0fc94.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The private driver who took Kaylee Goncalves and Madison Mogen back to their King Road home in the early hours of November 13, 2022, said the final ride had appeared completely normal at the time but weighed heavily on him after he learned the two...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br />The private driver who took Kaylee Goncalves and Madison Mogen back to their King Road home in the early hours of November 13, 2022, said the final ride had appeared completely normal at the time but weighed heavily on him after he learned the two women had been murdered. Goncalves and Mogen had spent the evening in downtown Moscow, stopped at a food truck and then received a ride home from the driver, arriving at the residence shortly before 2 a.m. He said there had been nothing about their behavior or the trip that had raised alarms, and he had seen no obvious sign that the women were in danger. In the aftermath, however, he repeatedly thought about the ride and the fact that he had been one of the last people known to have seen them alive. Police investigated the driver early in the case and determined that he was not believed to have been involved in the killings.<br /><br />The driver also described how unsettling the atmosphere in Moscow had become while the murders remained unsolved, with fear, rumors and online speculation spreading throughout the community. He said he had cooperated with investigators and provided information about his movements after dropping Goncalves and Mogen off, while authorities worked to reconstruct the victims’ final hours. At that stage of the investigation, police were still trying to account for portions of the victims’ timelines and determine who had entered the King Road residence before Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin were found stabbed to death. The driver’s account ultimately reinforced one of the most haunting aspects of the case at the time: Goncalves and Mogen had apparently made it home safely after an ordinary night out, with no indication during their ride that they were only hours away from being murdered.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>793</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Murder In Moscow:  The Driver Who Drove Kaylee And Madison Home Gives An Interview</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-the-driver-who-drove-kaylee-and-madison-home-gives-an-interview--73921183</link><description><![CDATA[The private driver who took Kaylee Goncalves and Madison Mogen home on the night of November 13, 2022, said the ride had appeared completely ordinary and that nothing about the two women or their surroundings had suggested danger. He picked them up after their night out in Moscow and dropped them at the King Road house shortly before 2 a.m., just hours before they and their roommates Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin were murdered. The driver later said he had replayed the ride repeatedly in his mind, searching for anything unusual that he might have missed, but he could not identify any warning sign. He described being deeply troubled by the knowledge that his job had been to get Goncalves and Mogen home safely, only for them to be killed after he left.<br /><br />After learning what had happened, the driver contacted Moscow police and provided investigators with information about the trip, including a receipt showing that he had stopped for food after dropping the women off. Authorities investigated and cleared him as a suspect, but he said the experience continued to weigh heavily on him, particularly as speculation about the murders spread online. He also expressed frustration over people on social media accusing innocent individuals while the investigation was still unfolding. At the time he first spoke publicly, police were still searching for the occupants of a white Hyundai Elantra believed to have been near the King Road residence around the time of the killings, and the driver’s account offered one of the clearest glimpses into Goncalves and Mogen’s final hours before they returned home.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73921183</guid><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73921183/kaymaddriver.mp3" length="18990437" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/faef2614-4836-437b-b8f1-252d32fcea00/faef2614-4836-437b-b8f1-252d32fcea00.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/faef2614-4836-437b-b8f1-252d32fcea00/faef2614-4836-437b-b8f1-252d32fcea00.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/faef2614-4836-437b-b8f1-252d32fcea00/faef2614-4836-437b-b8f1-252d32fcea00.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The private driver who took Kaylee Goncalves and Madison Mogen home on the night of November 13, 2022, said the ride had appeared completely ordinary and that nothing about the two women or their surroundings had suggested danger. He picked them up...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The private driver who took Kaylee Goncalves and Madison Mogen home on the night of November 13, 2022, said the ride had appeared completely ordinary and that nothing about the two women or their surroundings had suggested danger. He picked them up after their night out in Moscow and dropped them at the King Road house shortly before 2 a.m., just hours before they and their roommates Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin were murdered. The driver later said he had replayed the ride repeatedly in his mind, searching for anything unusual that he might have missed, but he could not identify any warning sign. He described being deeply troubled by the knowledge that his job had been to get Goncalves and Mogen home safely, only for them to be killed after he left.<br /><br />After learning what had happened, the driver contacted Moscow police and provided investigators with information about the trip, including a receipt showing that he had stopped for food after dropping the women off. Authorities investigated and cleared him as a suspect, but he said the experience continued to weigh heavily on him, particularly as speculation about the murders spread online. He also expressed frustration over people on social media accusing innocent individuals while the investigation was still unfolding. At the time he first spoke publicly, police were still searching for the occupants of a white Hyundai Elantra believed to have been near the King Road residence around the time of the killings, and the driver’s account offered one of the clearest glimpses into Goncalves and Mogen’s final hours before they returned home.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1187</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Tyler Robinson Tells The Court That There Is Not Enough Evidence To Proceed To Trial (Part 1) (8/13/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-tells-the-court-that-there-is-not-enough-evidence-to-proceed-to-trial-part-1-8-13-26--73855597</link><description><![CDATA[yler Robinson’s defense filed its written bindover argument on August 11, 2026, responding to the state’s 28-page memorandum asking Judge Tony Graf to order Robinson to stand trial. The defense filing was submitted after the five-day preliminary hearing, during which Robinson’s lawyers challenged several important parts of the prosecution’s evidentiary presentation, particularly the reliability and interpretation of forensic evidence. During that hearing, the defense called FBI and ATF forensic witnesses and questioned the reliability and subjectivity of portions of the DNA analysis, while also emphasizing that Robinson had not emerged as an investigative suspect until he surrendered. The defense had previously highlighted the ATF finding that the bullet jacket fragment recovered during the autopsy could not be conclusively identified as having been fired from the rifle authorities linked to Robinson. Those issues formed the factual backdrop to the defense’s argument against bindover.<br /><br />The central defense position was that prosecutors were asking the court to move Robinson into a capital murder trial even though significant weaknesses remained in the evidence used to identify him as the shooter and connect the recovered weapon to the killing. That stood directly against the prosecution’s position that Robinson’s alleged admissions, DNA evidence, surveillance footage and witness testimony made the bindover determination exceptionally straightforward. Importantly, the dispute was not about whether the state had proven Robinson guilty beyond a reasonable doubt; Judge Graf was deciding whether prosecutors had presented probable cause sufficient to send the seven charges to trial, a considerably lower legal threshold. Robinson’s defense was therefore attempting to persuade Graf that weaknesses exposed during the preliminary hearing were substantial enough that the state had not satisfied even that standard, while prosecutors argued that Robinson’s alleged admissions and the corroborating forensic and video evidence easily cleared it. The state is scheduled to file its rebuttal on August 18, with oral arguments before Graf set for September 1.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73855597</guid><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73855597/tylerrobinsonrespondstobinding1.mp3" length="12163074" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/22fba064-ff52-492f-8ad4-76cb942bbbfc/22fba064-ff52-492f-8ad4-76cb942bbbfc.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/22fba064-ff52-492f-8ad4-76cb942bbbfc/22fba064-ff52-492f-8ad4-76cb942bbbfc.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/22fba064-ff52-492f-8ad4-76cb942bbbfc/22fba064-ff52-492f-8ad4-76cb942bbbfc.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>yler Robinson’s defense filed its written bindover argument on August 11, 2026, responding to the state’s 28-page memorandum asking Judge Tony Graf to order Robinson to stand trial. The defense filing was submitted after the five-day preliminary...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[yler Robinson’s defense filed its written bindover argument on August 11, 2026, responding to the state’s 28-page memorandum asking Judge Tony Graf to order Robinson to stand trial. The defense filing was submitted after the five-day preliminary hearing, during which Robinson’s lawyers challenged several important parts of the prosecution’s evidentiary presentation, particularly the reliability and interpretation of forensic evidence. During that hearing, the defense called FBI and ATF forensic witnesses and questioned the reliability and subjectivity of portions of the DNA analysis, while also emphasizing that Robinson had not emerged as an investigative suspect until he surrendered. The defense had previously highlighted the ATF finding that the bullet jacket fragment recovered during the autopsy could not be conclusively identified as having been fired from the rifle authorities linked to Robinson. Those issues formed the factual backdrop to the defense’s argument against bindover.<br /><br />The central defense position was that prosecutors were asking the court to move Robinson into a capital murder trial even though significant weaknesses remained in the evidence used to identify him as the shooter and connect the recovered weapon to the killing. That stood directly against the prosecution’s position that Robinson’s alleged admissions, DNA evidence, surveillance footage and witness testimony made the bindover determination exceptionally straightforward. Importantly, the dispute was not about whether the state had proven Robinson guilty beyond a reasonable doubt; Judge Graf was deciding whether prosecutors had presented probable cause sufficient to send the seven charges to trial, a considerably lower legal threshold. Robinson’s defense was therefore attempting to persuade Graf that weaknesses exposed during the preliminary hearing were substantial enough that the state had not satisfied even that standard, while prosecutors argued that Robinson’s alleged admissions and the corroborating forensic and video evidence easily cleared it. The state is scheduled to file its rebuttal on August 18, with oral arguments before Graf set for September 1.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>761</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The New Mexico Epstein Commission Interim Report (Part 14) (8/13/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-new-mexico-epstein-commission-interim-report-part-14-8-13-26--73855583</link><description><![CDATA[The New Mexico Survivors’ Truth Commission’s 119-page interim report described Zorro Ranch as a major and largely neglected component of Jeffrey Epstein’s broader operation, concluding that authorities failed for years to seriously investigate what happened there. According to the Commission, Epstein maintained an elaborate, highly controlled compound in New Mexico where survivors reported sexual abuse and where young women were routinely transported, housed and brought into Epstein’s orbit. The report pointed to witness testimony, flight records, seized electronic evidence and FBI material suggesting that Zorro Ranch was integrated into the same system of recruitment, secrecy and exploitation seen at Epstein’s other properties. Among the evidence discussed were computer folders labeled “ZORRO,” discs referencing nude photographs associated with the ranch, accounts of young women arriving by aircraft, efforts to impose restrictive nondisclosure agreements on workers, and survivor statements describing abuse in New Mexico. The Commission stressed that the evidence remained under review and that allegations involving individuals named in the report were not final findings of wrongdoing, but it said the existing record was already sufficient to show that Epstein’s activities in New Mexico deserved far more scrutiny than they ever received.<br /><br />The report was especially critical of institutional failures, saying New Mexico and federal authorities effectively passed responsibility to prosecutors elsewhere while Epstein’s conduct in the state went largely unexamined. It said the U.S. Attorney’s Office for New Mexico and state officials expected the Southern District of New York to handle Epstein, but New York prosecutors concentrated on crimes tied to New York and Florida rather than building a New Mexico case. Zorro Ranch was never searched while Epstein was alive and, according to the report, was not subjected to a comprehensive law-enforcement search until March 2026, nearly seven years after his death. The Commission concluded that this passivity allowed evidence to disappear, memories to fade and potential criminal cases to become more difficult or impossible to prosecute. It also opened separate lines of inquiry into Epstein’s financial dealings, his relationships with scientific institutions and wealthy associates, and the conduct of banks, including subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan. Its clearest interim observation was devastating: Epstein continued exercising wealth and influence after becoming a registered sex offender, operated much of his system in plain sight, and New Mexico law enforcement’s decision to rely on other jurisdictions left the conduct of Epstein and his co-conspirators in the state “unexamined and unpunished.” Final findings and recommendations were deferred while the Commission continued issuing subpoenas, interviewing witnesses and searching for additional survivors and potential perpetrators.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.nmlegis.gov/handouts/HISC%20080526%20Item%201%20Interim%20Report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">NM Survivors' Truth Commission — Interim Report</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73855583</guid><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73855583/nmreport14.mp3" length="14013379" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1d14a6dd-0564-45b7-85a2-70e0d162a4e9/1d14a6dd-0564-45b7-85a2-70e0d162a4e9.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1d14a6dd-0564-45b7-85a2-70e0d162a4e9/1d14a6dd-0564-45b7-85a2-70e0d162a4e9.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1d14a6dd-0564-45b7-85a2-70e0d162a4e9/1d14a6dd-0564-45b7-85a2-70e0d162a4e9.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The New Mexico Survivors’ Truth Commission’s 119-page interim report described Zorro Ranch as a major and largely neglected component of Jeffrey Epstein’s broader operation, concluding that authorities failed for years to seriously investigate what...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The New Mexico Survivors’ Truth Commission’s 119-page interim report described Zorro Ranch as a major and largely neglected component of Jeffrey Epstein’s broader operation, concluding that authorities failed for years to seriously investigate what happened there. According to the Commission, Epstein maintained an elaborate, highly controlled compound in New Mexico where survivors reported sexual abuse and where young women were routinely transported, housed and brought into Epstein’s orbit. The report pointed to witness testimony, flight records, seized electronic evidence and FBI material suggesting that Zorro Ranch was integrated into the same system of recruitment, secrecy and exploitation seen at Epstein’s other properties. Among the evidence discussed were computer folders labeled “ZORRO,” discs referencing nude photographs associated with the ranch, accounts of young women arriving by aircraft, efforts to impose restrictive nondisclosure agreements on workers, and survivor statements describing abuse in New Mexico. The Commission stressed that the evidence remained under review and that allegations involving individuals named in the report were not final findings of wrongdoing, but it said the existing record was already sufficient to show that Epstein’s activities in New Mexico deserved far more scrutiny than they ever received.<br /><br />The report was especially critical of institutional failures, saying New Mexico and federal authorities effectively passed responsibility to prosecutors elsewhere while Epstein’s conduct in the state went largely unexamined. It said the U.S. Attorney’s Office for New Mexico and state officials expected the Southern District of New York to handle Epstein, but New York prosecutors concentrated on crimes tied to New York and Florida rather than building a New Mexico case. Zorro Ranch was never searched while Epstein was alive and, according to the report, was not subjected to a comprehensive law-enforcement search until March 2026, nearly seven years after his death. The Commission concluded that this passivity allowed evidence to disappear, memories to fade and potential criminal cases to become more difficult or impossible to prosecute. It also opened separate lines of inquiry into Epstein’s financial dealings, his relationships with scientific institutions and wealthy associates, and the conduct of banks, including subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan. Its clearest interim observation was devastating: Epstein continued exercising wealth and influence after becoming a registered sex offender, operated much of his system in plain sight, and New Mexico law enforcement’s decision to rely on other jurisdictions left the conduct of Epstein and his co-conspirators in the state “unexamined and unpunished.” Final findings and recommendations were deferred while the Commission continued issuing subpoenas, interviewing witnesses and searching for additional survivors and potential perpetrators.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.nmlegis.gov/handouts/HISC%20080526%20Item%201%20Interim%20Report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">NM Survivors' Truth Commission — Interim Report</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>876</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The New Mexico Epstein Commission Interim Report (Part 13) (8/13/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-new-mexico-epstein-commission-interim-report-part-13-8-13-26--73855580</link><description><![CDATA[The New Mexico Survivors’ Truth Commission’s 119-page interim report described Zorro Ranch as a major and largely neglected component of Jeffrey Epstein’s broader operation, concluding that authorities failed for years to seriously investigate what happened there. According to the Commission, Epstein maintained an elaborate, highly controlled compound in New Mexico where survivors reported sexual abuse and where young women were routinely transported, housed and brought into Epstein’s orbit. The report pointed to witness testimony, flight records, seized electronic evidence and FBI material suggesting that Zorro Ranch was integrated into the same system of recruitment, secrecy and exploitation seen at Epstein’s other properties. Among the evidence discussed were computer folders labeled “ZORRO,” discs referencing nude photographs associated with the ranch, accounts of young women arriving by aircraft, efforts to impose restrictive nondisclosure agreements on workers, and survivor statements describing abuse in New Mexico. The Commission stressed that the evidence remained under review and that allegations involving individuals named in the report were not final findings of wrongdoing, but it said the existing record was already sufficient to show that Epstein’s activities in New Mexico deserved far more scrutiny than they ever received.<br /><br />The report was especially critical of institutional failures, saying New Mexico and federal authorities effectively passed responsibility to prosecutors elsewhere while Epstein’s conduct in the state went largely unexamined. It said the U.S. Attorney’s Office for New Mexico and state officials expected the Southern District of New York to handle Epstein, but New York prosecutors concentrated on crimes tied to New York and Florida rather than building a New Mexico case. Zorro Ranch was never searched while Epstein was alive and, according to the report, was not subjected to a comprehensive law-enforcement search until March 2026, nearly seven years after his death. The Commission concluded that this passivity allowed evidence to disappear, memories to fade and potential criminal cases to become more difficult or impossible to prosecute. It also opened separate lines of inquiry into Epstein’s financial dealings, his relationships with scientific institutions and wealthy associates, and the conduct of banks, including subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan. Its clearest interim observation was devastating: Epstein continued exercising wealth and influence after becoming a registered sex offender, operated much of his system in plain sight, and New Mexico law enforcement’s decision to rely on other jurisdictions left the conduct of Epstein and his co-conspirators in the state “unexamined and unpunished.” Final findings and recommendations were deferred while the Commission continued issuing subpoenas, interviewing witnesses and searching for additional survivors and potential perpetrators.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.nmlegis.gov/handouts/HISC%20080526%20Item%201%20Interim%20Report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">NM Survivors' Truth Commission — Interim Report</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73855580</guid><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73855580/nmreport13.mp3" length="13223854" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d926b208-4be4-4398-8153-91fba3493fd3/d926b208-4be4-4398-8153-91fba3493fd3.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d926b208-4be4-4398-8153-91fba3493fd3/d926b208-4be4-4398-8153-91fba3493fd3.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d926b208-4be4-4398-8153-91fba3493fd3/d926b208-4be4-4398-8153-91fba3493fd3.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The New Mexico Survivors’ Truth Commission’s 119-page interim report described Zorro Ranch as a major and largely neglected component of Jeffrey Epstein’s broader operation, concluding that authorities failed for years to seriously investigate what...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The New Mexico Survivors’ Truth Commission’s 119-page interim report described Zorro Ranch as a major and largely neglected component of Jeffrey Epstein’s broader operation, concluding that authorities failed for years to seriously investigate what happened there. According to the Commission, Epstein maintained an elaborate, highly controlled compound in New Mexico where survivors reported sexual abuse and where young women were routinely transported, housed and brought into Epstein’s orbit. The report pointed to witness testimony, flight records, seized electronic evidence and FBI material suggesting that Zorro Ranch was integrated into the same system of recruitment, secrecy and exploitation seen at Epstein’s other properties. Among the evidence discussed were computer folders labeled “ZORRO,” discs referencing nude photographs associated with the ranch, accounts of young women arriving by aircraft, efforts to impose restrictive nondisclosure agreements on workers, and survivor statements describing abuse in New Mexico. The Commission stressed that the evidence remained under review and that allegations involving individuals named in the report were not final findings of wrongdoing, but it said the existing record was already sufficient to show that Epstein’s activities in New Mexico deserved far more scrutiny than they ever received.<br /><br />The report was especially critical of institutional failures, saying New Mexico and federal authorities effectively passed responsibility to prosecutors elsewhere while Epstein’s conduct in the state went largely unexamined. It said the U.S. Attorney’s Office for New Mexico and state officials expected the Southern District of New York to handle Epstein, but New York prosecutors concentrated on crimes tied to New York and Florida rather than building a New Mexico case. Zorro Ranch was never searched while Epstein was alive and, according to the report, was not subjected to a comprehensive law-enforcement search until March 2026, nearly seven years after his death. The Commission concluded that this passivity allowed evidence to disappear, memories to fade and potential criminal cases to become more difficult or impossible to prosecute. It also opened separate lines of inquiry into Epstein’s financial dealings, his relationships with scientific institutions and wealthy associates, and the conduct of banks, including subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan. Its clearest interim observation was devastating: Epstein continued exercising wealth and influence after becoming a registered sex offender, operated much of his system in plain sight, and New Mexico law enforcement’s decision to rely on other jurisdictions left the conduct of Epstein and his co-conspirators in the state “unexamined and unpunished.” Final findings and recommendations were deferred while the Commission continued issuing subpoenas, interviewing witnesses and searching for additional survivors and potential perpetrators.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.nmlegis.gov/handouts/HISC%20080526%20Item%201%20Interim%20Report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">NM Survivors' Truth Commission — Interim Report</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>827</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Murder In Moscow:  The Autopsy Findings in the Murders of Madison, Kaylee, Xana and Ethan (Part 3) (8/13/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-the-autopsy-findings-in-the-murders-of-madison-kaylee-xana-and-ethan-part-3-8-13-26--73920995</link><description><![CDATA[The autopsy reports for University of Idaho students Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin documented the extraordinary violence of the November 13, 2022 murders inside the King Road residence in Moscow. Spokane County Chief Medical Examiner Dr. Veena Singh determined that all four died from multiple sharp-force injuries consistent with a large fixed-blade knife, including a weapon such as the Ka-Bar prosecutors said was used in the killings. Mogen suffered 28 stab wounds, including extensive injuries to her face, neck and upper body that damaged major blood vessels, a lung and her liver. Chapin suffered fewer wounds than the three women, but his injuries included devastating wounds to the neck and major blood vessels, including one wound reportedly measuring approximately seven inches deep. Singh concluded that all four victims experienced a high degree of pain or suffering before death, although Chapin's suffering was assessed as occurring to a lesser degree than that of the other victims.<br /><br />The reports provided particularly disturbing new details about Kernodle and Goncalves. Kernodle suffered numerous wounds across her head, neck, chest, abdomen, back and extremities, including injuries to her heart, lung and major blood vessels, and her autopsy was the only one that specifically identified injuries consistent with defensive wounds, supporting the conclusion that she attempted to fight off her attacker. Goncalves suffered a combination of sharp-force and blunt-force trauma that the medical examiner described as more severe in certain respects than the injuries suffered by the others; her injuries included bleeding around the brain, a fractured nose, significant facial trauma and a knocked-out tooth, as well as evidence suggesting that an object had been pressed across her mouth. Taken together, the newly disclosed autopsy findings provided a much clearer medical picture of what occurred inside the house and demonstrated that this was not simply a series of quick fatal stab wounds, but an exceptionally violent attack in which the four victims suffered extensive and, in some cases, markedly different injuries before their deaths.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hFN8NIvmLwTktmiOCrSwFdHPOrW2x_V-/view?pli=1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">012725+Exhibits+S-1+and+S-1+a-e+to+States+Supp+Resp+to+Rqst+for+Disc+RE+Penalty+Phase+Experts.pdf - Google Drive</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73920995</guid><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 18:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73920995/moscowautopsyreport3.mp3" length="12004249" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/88ca4655-962a-43be-a7e5-2f2c292038ad/88ca4655-962a-43be-a7e5-2f2c292038ad.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/88ca4655-962a-43be-a7e5-2f2c292038ad/88ca4655-962a-43be-a7e5-2f2c292038ad.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/88ca4655-962a-43be-a7e5-2f2c292038ad/88ca4655-962a-43be-a7e5-2f2c292038ad.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The autopsy reports for University of Idaho students Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin documented the extraordinary violence of the November 13, 2022 murders inside the King Road residence in Moscow. Spokane County Chief...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The autopsy reports for University of Idaho students Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin documented the extraordinary violence of the November 13, 2022 murders inside the King Road residence in Moscow. Spokane County Chief Medical Examiner Dr. Veena Singh determined that all four died from multiple sharp-force injuries consistent with a large fixed-blade knife, including a weapon such as the Ka-Bar prosecutors said was used in the killings. Mogen suffered 28 stab wounds, including extensive injuries to her face, neck and upper body that damaged major blood vessels, a lung and her liver. Chapin suffered fewer wounds than the three women, but his injuries included devastating wounds to the neck and major blood vessels, including one wound reportedly measuring approximately seven inches deep. Singh concluded that all four victims experienced a high degree of pain or suffering before death, although Chapin's suffering was assessed as occurring to a lesser degree than that of the other victims.<br /><br />The reports provided particularly disturbing new details about Kernodle and Goncalves. Kernodle suffered numerous wounds across her head, neck, chest, abdomen, back and extremities, including injuries to her heart, lung and major blood vessels, and her autopsy was the only one that specifically identified injuries consistent with defensive wounds, supporting the conclusion that she attempted to fight off her attacker. Goncalves suffered a combination of sharp-force and blunt-force trauma that the medical examiner described as more severe in certain respects than the injuries suffered by the others; her injuries included bleeding around the brain, a fractured nose, significant facial trauma and a knocked-out tooth, as well as evidence suggesting that an object had been pressed across her mouth. Taken together, the newly disclosed autopsy findings provided a much clearer medical picture of what occurred inside the house and demonstrated that this was not simply a series of quick fatal stab wounds, but an exceptionally violent attack in which the four victims suffered extensive and, in some cases, markedly different injuries before their deaths.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hFN8NIvmLwTktmiOCrSwFdHPOrW2x_V-/view?pli=1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">012725+Exhibits+S-1+and+S-1+a-e+to+States+Supp+Resp+to+Rqst+for+Disc+RE+Penalty+Phase+Experts.pdf - Google Drive</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>751</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Judge Loretta Preska Orders Ghislaine Maxwell Grand Jury Documents To Be Unsealed (8/13/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/judge-loretta-preska-orders-ghislaine-maxwell-grand-jury-documents-to-be-unsealed-8-13-26--73855584</link><description><![CDATA[A federal judge in New York ordered the unsealing of grand jury-related materials connected to the investigation of Ghislaine Maxwell, rejecting Maxwell’s attempts to keep the records from becoming public. U.S. District Judge Loretta Preska granted the Justice Department’s request to release materials that had originally been obtained through grand jury subpoenas from the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner. Those records originated in Virginia Giuffre’s civil defamation lawsuit against Maxwell and included evidence tied to Maxwell’s 2016 depositions. Preska ruled that Maxwell’s procedural, statutory and constitutional objections were without merit and said the remaining materials in the government’s possession should become part of the public record, with appropriate redactions to protect victims. The disclosure was ordered under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, legislation requiring the Justice Department to release records related to the federal investigations of Jeffrey Epstein and his associates.<br /><br />The significance of the records was that Maxwell’s testimony in the Giuffre litigation later became the foundation for two federal perjury charges against her. Prosecutors accused Maxwell of lying under oath when she denied knowledge of Epstein’s sexual abuse and recruitment of young women and girls. Those perjury counts were eventually separated from Maxwell’s sex-trafficking prosecution and later dropped after her 2021 conviction remained intact, but the underlying testimony continued to represent an important part of the government’s case against her. The new unsealing order therefore opened another portion of the investigative record surrounding Maxwell and Epstein, particularly evidence that had previously been shielded by grand jury secrecy and the confidentiality surrounding the earlier civil litigation. Preska’s ruling represented another step toward making previously sealed Epstein-related investigative materials available to the public while maintaining protections for victims whose identities or private information could appear in the records.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://courthousenews.com/new-york-judge-orders-unsealing-of-ghislaine-maxwell-related-grand-jury-subpoenas/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">New York judge orders unsealing of Ghislaine Maxwell-related grand jury subpoenas | Courthouse News Service</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73855584</guid><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73855584/preskaunseals.mp3" length="11659851" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2efd134d-932c-4d47-8887-5d51899bea12/2efd134d-932c-4d47-8887-5d51899bea12.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2efd134d-932c-4d47-8887-5d51899bea12/2efd134d-932c-4d47-8887-5d51899bea12.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2efd134d-932c-4d47-8887-5d51899bea12/2efd134d-932c-4d47-8887-5d51899bea12.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A federal judge in New York ordered the unsealing of grand jury-related materials connected to the investigation of Ghislaine Maxwell, rejecting Maxwell’s attempts to keep the records from becoming public. U.S. District Judge Loretta Preska granted...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A federal judge in New York ordered the unsealing of grand jury-related materials connected to the investigation of Ghislaine Maxwell, rejecting Maxwell’s attempts to keep the records from becoming public. U.S. District Judge Loretta Preska granted the Justice Department’s request to release materials that had originally been obtained through grand jury subpoenas from the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner. Those records originated in Virginia Giuffre’s civil defamation lawsuit against Maxwell and included evidence tied to Maxwell’s 2016 depositions. Preska ruled that Maxwell’s procedural, statutory and constitutional objections were without merit and said the remaining materials in the government’s possession should become part of the public record, with appropriate redactions to protect victims. The disclosure was ordered under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, legislation requiring the Justice Department to release records related to the federal investigations of Jeffrey Epstein and his associates.<br /><br />The significance of the records was that Maxwell’s testimony in the Giuffre litigation later became the foundation for two federal perjury charges against her. Prosecutors accused Maxwell of lying under oath when she denied knowledge of Epstein’s sexual abuse and recruitment of young women and girls. Those perjury counts were eventually separated from Maxwell’s sex-trafficking prosecution and later dropped after her 2021 conviction remained intact, but the underlying testimony continued to represent an important part of the government’s case against her. The new unsealing order therefore opened another portion of the investigative record surrounding Maxwell and Epstein, particularly evidence that had previously been shielded by grand jury secrecy and the confidentiality surrounding the earlier civil litigation. Preska’s ruling represented another step toward making previously sealed Epstein-related investigative materials available to the public while maintaining protections for victims whose identities or private information could appear in the records.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://courthousenews.com/new-york-judge-orders-unsealing-of-ghislaine-maxwell-related-grand-jury-subpoenas/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">New York judge orders unsealing of Ghislaine Maxwell-related grand jury subpoenas | Courthouse News Service</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>729</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Why Didn’t Authorities Press Larry Visoski for More Answers (Part 2) (8/13/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/why-didn-t-authorities-press-larry-visoski-for-more-answers-part-2-8-13-26--73855582</link><description><![CDATA[Larry Visoski was far more than Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime pilot. For nearly three decades, he occupied a critical logistical position inside Epstein’s world, flying him between New York, Palm Beach, New Mexico, the Virgin Islands and other destinations while gaining firsthand familiarity with Epstein’s properties, travel patterns, employees and associates. Visoski’s importance was underscored by his testimony at Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial, where he described Maxwell as essentially Epstein’s number two and helped prosecutors explain the internal structure of Epstein’s operation. His connection to Epstein also extended beyond the cockpit, including reported property and financial ties involving roughly 40 acres connected to Zorro Ranch. None of that, by itself, proved that Visoski knowingly participated in Epstein’s crimes, but his extraordinary longevity, access and proximity made him one of the most potentially valuable witnesses for reconstructing how Epstein’s operation actually functioned.<br /><br />The larger unanswered question was why the government never provided a comprehensive public accounting of what Visoski knew and whether investigators seriously explored the possibility that his knowledge went beyond innocent employment. Epstein’s criminal enterprise depended heavily on private aviation to connect his secluded properties, transport employees and guests, and maintain the mobility that allowed him to operate across multiple jurisdictions. A chief pilot serving him for decades would have been positioned to observe recurring passengers, unusual travel patterns, scheduling practices and the employees responsible for coordinating Epstein’s movements, even if he never directly witnessed sexual abuse. Prosecutors would have needed evidence of criminal intent to charge Visoski, and proximity alone was never enough, but that did not lessen the need for exhaustive scrutiny. His role ultimately highlighted one of the enduring failures of the Epstein investigation: the public learned an enormous amount about the machinery surrounding Epstein, yet still received remarkably few answers about what his longest-serving insiders knew, what they told investigators and why so little accountability extended beyond Epstein and Maxwell.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73855582</guid><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73855582/visoski2.mp3" length="14338969" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/67061836-962e-439e-a84e-ff32747ca2de/67061836-962e-439e-a84e-ff32747ca2de.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/67061836-962e-439e-a84e-ff32747ca2de/67061836-962e-439e-a84e-ff32747ca2de.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/67061836-962e-439e-a84e-ff32747ca2de/67061836-962e-439e-a84e-ff32747ca2de.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Larry Visoski was far more than Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime pilot. For nearly three decades, he occupied a critical logistical position inside Epstein’s world, flying him between New York, Palm Beach, New Mexico, the Virgin Islands and other...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Larry Visoski was far more than Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime pilot. For nearly three decades, he occupied a critical logistical position inside Epstein’s world, flying him between New York, Palm Beach, New Mexico, the Virgin Islands and other destinations while gaining firsthand familiarity with Epstein’s properties, travel patterns, employees and associates. Visoski’s importance was underscored by his testimony at Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial, where he described Maxwell as essentially Epstein’s number two and helped prosecutors explain the internal structure of Epstein’s operation. His connection to Epstein also extended beyond the cockpit, including reported property and financial ties involving roughly 40 acres connected to Zorro Ranch. None of that, by itself, proved that Visoski knowingly participated in Epstein’s crimes, but his extraordinary longevity, access and proximity made him one of the most potentially valuable witnesses for reconstructing how Epstein’s operation actually functioned.<br /><br />The larger unanswered question was why the government never provided a comprehensive public accounting of what Visoski knew and whether investigators seriously explored the possibility that his knowledge went beyond innocent employment. Epstein’s criminal enterprise depended heavily on private aviation to connect his secluded properties, transport employees and guests, and maintain the mobility that allowed him to operate across multiple jurisdictions. A chief pilot serving him for decades would have been positioned to observe recurring passengers, unusual travel patterns, scheduling practices and the employees responsible for coordinating Epstein’s movements, even if he never directly witnessed sexual abuse. Prosecutors would have needed evidence of criminal intent to charge Visoski, and proximity alone was never enough, but that did not lessen the need for exhaustive scrutiny. His role ultimately highlighted one of the enduring failures of the Epstein investigation: the public learned an enormous amount about the machinery surrounding Epstein, yet still received remarkably few answers about what his longest-serving insiders knew, what they told investigators and why so little accountability extended beyond Epstein and Maxwell.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>897</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Why Didn’t Authorities Press Larry Visoski for More Answers (Part 1) (8/13/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/why-didn-t-authorities-press-larry-visoski-for-more-answers-part-1-8-13-26--73855581</link><description><![CDATA[Larry Visoski was far more than Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime pilot. For nearly three decades, he occupied a critical logistical position inside Epstein’s world, flying him between New York, Palm Beach, New Mexico, the Virgin Islands and other destinations while gaining firsthand familiarity with Epstein’s properties, travel patterns, employees and associates. Visoski’s importance was underscored by his testimony at Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial, where he described Maxwell as essentially Epstein’s number two and helped prosecutors explain the internal structure of Epstein’s operation. His connection to Epstein also extended beyond the cockpit, including reported property and financial ties involving roughly 40 acres connected to Zorro Ranch. None of that, by itself, proved that Visoski knowingly participated in Epstein’s crimes, but his extraordinary longevity, access and proximity made him one of the most potentially valuable witnesses for reconstructing how Epstein’s operation actually functioned.<br /><br />The larger unanswered question was why the government never provided a comprehensive public accounting of what Visoski knew and whether investigators seriously explored the possibility that his knowledge went beyond innocent employment. Epstein’s criminal enterprise depended heavily on private aviation to connect his secluded properties, transport employees and guests, and maintain the mobility that allowed him to operate across multiple jurisdictions. A chief pilot serving him for decades would have been positioned to observe recurring passengers, unusual travel patterns, scheduling practices and the employees responsible for coordinating Epstein’s movements, even if he never directly witnessed sexual abuse. Prosecutors would have needed evidence of criminal intent to charge Visoski, and proximity alone was never enough, but that did not lessen the need for exhaustive scrutiny. His role ultimately highlighted one of the enduring failures of the Epstein investigation: the public learned an enormous amount about the machinery surrounding Epstein, yet still received remarkably few answers about what his longest-serving insiders knew, what they told investigators and why so little accountability extended beyond Epstein and Maxwell.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73855581</guid><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73855581/visoski1.mp3" length="12288879" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/be8f10ed-58f9-472a-9902-dfc327e69758/be8f10ed-58f9-472a-9902-dfc327e69758.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/be8f10ed-58f9-472a-9902-dfc327e69758/be8f10ed-58f9-472a-9902-dfc327e69758.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/be8f10ed-58f9-472a-9902-dfc327e69758/be8f10ed-58f9-472a-9902-dfc327e69758.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Larry Visoski was far more than Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime pilot. For nearly three decades, he occupied a critical logistical position inside Epstein’s world, flying him between New York, Palm Beach, New Mexico, the Virgin Islands and other...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Larry Visoski was far more than Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime pilot. For nearly three decades, he occupied a critical logistical position inside Epstein’s world, flying him between New York, Palm Beach, New Mexico, the Virgin Islands and other destinations while gaining firsthand familiarity with Epstein’s properties, travel patterns, employees and associates. Visoski’s importance was underscored by his testimony at Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial, where he described Maxwell as essentially Epstein’s number two and helped prosecutors explain the internal structure of Epstein’s operation. His connection to Epstein also extended beyond the cockpit, including reported property and financial ties involving roughly 40 acres connected to Zorro Ranch. None of that, by itself, proved that Visoski knowingly participated in Epstein’s crimes, but his extraordinary longevity, access and proximity made him one of the most potentially valuable witnesses for reconstructing how Epstein’s operation actually functioned.<br /><br />The larger unanswered question was why the government never provided a comprehensive public accounting of what Visoski knew and whether investigators seriously explored the possibility that his knowledge went beyond innocent employment. Epstein’s criminal enterprise depended heavily on private aviation to connect his secluded properties, transport employees and guests, and maintain the mobility that allowed him to operate across multiple jurisdictions. A chief pilot serving him for decades would have been positioned to observe recurring passengers, unusual travel patterns, scheduling practices and the employees responsible for coordinating Epstein’s movements, even if he never directly witnessed sexual abuse. Prosecutors would have needed evidence of criminal intent to charge Visoski, and proximity alone was never enough, but that did not lessen the need for exhaustive scrutiny. His role ultimately highlighted one of the enduring failures of the Epstein investigation: the public learned an enormous amount about the machinery surrounding Epstein, yet still received remarkably few answers about what his longest-serving insiders knew, what they told investigators and why so little accountability extended beyond Epstein and Maxwell.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>769</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Bryan Kohberger Looks To Exclude Testimony From Expert Rylene Nowlin (8/13/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-looks-to-exclude-testimony-from-expert-rylene-nowlin-8-13-26--73849800</link><description><![CDATA[Bryan Kohberger’s defense asked the court to exclude testimony from Rylene Nowlin, the laboratory manager at the Idaho State Police Forensic Services Laboratory, concerning how Kohberger’s DNA allegedly came to be on the knife sheath recovered from the King Road crime scene. The defense specifically challenged Nowlin’s proposed opinion that the DNA was more likely deposited through direct transfer rather than indirectly transferred from another person or object. Kohberger’s attorneys argued that determining precisely how or when DNA was transferred went beyond the proper expertise of a traditional DNA analyst and entered an area where the forensic community lacked sufficient scientific consensus. They relied heavily on a 2024 National Institute of Standards and Technology report addressing DNA transfer, persistence, prevalence and recovery, which cautioned against analysts offering conclusions about the activity or mechanism that caused DNA to appear on an item. The defense maintained that Nowlin’s opinion would therefore be speculative, potentially misleading to jurors and unfairly prejudicial because it could make the DNA on the sheath appear more incriminating than the underlying science justified.<br /><br />Kohberger’s lawyers also sought to prevent witnesses from describing the sheath evidence using terms such as “touch DNA” or “contact DNA,” arguing that those labels could misleadingly suggest that Kohberger necessarily touched the sheath himself. They further contended that Nowlin’s proposed testimony was not legitimate rebuttal evidence because her opinion about direct DNA transfer effectively supported a central part of the prosecution’s affirmative theory of the case and should have been presented and disclosed accordingly. Judge Steven Hippler ultimately declined to exclude Nowlin’s opinions, finding that expert testimony concerning the relative likelihood of direct versus indirect DNA transfer could help jurors understand the significance of the DNA evidence. However, the judge agreed that terminology such as “touch DNA,” “contact DNA” and “trace DNA” could create confusion and directed the parties to have their witnesses avoid those labels. The ruling therefore allowed Nowlin to testify about DNA transfer while restricting some of the terminology prosecutors could use to characterize the genetic material recovered from the sheath.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73849800</guid><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73849800/megaexcluderowlin.mp3" length="20813157" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cb102446-b7c3-4511-b2db-edc1f8434ee5/cb102446-b7c3-4511-b2db-edc1f8434ee5.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cb102446-b7c3-4511-b2db-edc1f8434ee5/cb102446-b7c3-4511-b2db-edc1f8434ee5.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cb102446-b7c3-4511-b2db-edc1f8434ee5/cb102446-b7c3-4511-b2db-edc1f8434ee5.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Bryan Kohberger’s defense asked the court to exclude testimony from Rylene Nowlin, the laboratory manager at the Idaho State Police Forensic Services Laboratory, concerning how Kohberger’s DNA allegedly came to be on the knife sheath recovered from...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Bryan Kohberger’s defense asked the court to exclude testimony from Rylene Nowlin, the laboratory manager at the Idaho State Police Forensic Services Laboratory, concerning how Kohberger’s DNA allegedly came to be on the knife sheath recovered from the King Road crime scene. The defense specifically challenged Nowlin’s proposed opinion that the DNA was more likely deposited through direct transfer rather than indirectly transferred from another person or object. Kohberger’s attorneys argued that determining precisely how or when DNA was transferred went beyond the proper expertise of a traditional DNA analyst and entered an area where the forensic community lacked sufficient scientific consensus. They relied heavily on a 2024 National Institute of Standards and Technology report addressing DNA transfer, persistence, prevalence and recovery, which cautioned against analysts offering conclusions about the activity or mechanism that caused DNA to appear on an item. The defense maintained that Nowlin’s opinion would therefore be speculative, potentially misleading to jurors and unfairly prejudicial because it could make the DNA on the sheath appear more incriminating than the underlying science justified.<br /><br />Kohberger’s lawyers also sought to prevent witnesses from describing the sheath evidence using terms such as “touch DNA” or “contact DNA,” arguing that those labels could misleadingly suggest that Kohberger necessarily touched the sheath himself. They further contended that Nowlin’s proposed testimony was not legitimate rebuttal evidence because her opinion about direct DNA transfer effectively supported a central part of the prosecution’s affirmative theory of the case and should have been presented and disclosed accordingly. Judge Steven Hippler ultimately declined to exclude Nowlin’s opinions, finding that expert testimony concerning the relative likelihood of direct versus indirect DNA transfer could help jurors understand the significance of the DNA evidence. However, the judge agreed that terminology such as “touch DNA,” “contact DNA” and “trace DNA” could create confusion and directed the parties to have their witnesses avoid those labels. The ruling therefore allowed Nowlin to testify about DNA transfer while restricting some of the terminology prosecutors could use to characterize the genetic material recovered from the sheath.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1301</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The Judge Denies The Tik Tok Tarot Card Readers Motion To Dismiss (8/13/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-judge-denies-the-tik-tok-tarot-card-readers-motion-to-dismiss-8-13-26--73849599</link><description><![CDATA[U.S. Magistrate Judge Raymond E. Patricco denied Ashley Guillard’s motion to dismiss the defamation lawsuit brought by University of Idaho professor Rebecca Scofield, rejecting Guillard’s attempts to argue that the federal court lacked authority to hear the case. Guillard, who represented herself, contended that the court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction and personal jurisdiction over her, that Idaho was the wrong venue because she lived in Texas and posted her TikTok videos from there, and that the judge had demonstrated bias against her spiritual and psychic beliefs. The court disagreed, finding that Guillard had intentionally directed her accusations toward an Idaho professor and an Idaho-centered murder case and that Scofield alleged she suffered the resulting reputational, professional and emotional harm in Idaho. The judge concluded that those contacts were sufficient for the Idaho federal court to exercise jurisdiction over Guillard and that Idaho was a proper venue for the lawsuit.<br /><br /><br />Patricco also rejected Guillard’s argument that the court had improperly judged the validity of her tarot readings or spiritual practices. The judge explained that the case was not about deciding whether psychic abilities or spiritual beliefs were real; it was about whether Guillard had made actionable defamatory statements about Scofield, including accusations that Scofield had been romantically involved with one of the murdered students and had arranged the killings. At the motion-to-dismiss stage, the court was required to accept Scofield’s well-pleaded allegations as true and determine whether they stated a legally viable defamation claim, not decide whether Guillard’s accusations were ultimately true. Patricco found that Scofield had adequately alleged defamation and ruled that Guillard’s disagreements with earlier court decisions did not establish judicial bias or justify throwing out the case. On November 13, 2023, he therefore denied Guillard’s motion to set aside the court’s prior rulings and denied her motion to dismiss, allowing Scofield’s lawsuit to continue.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73849599</guid><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73849599/megatiktoktarotdenieddismissal.mp3" length="56961611" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f7f547fe-4e73-4784-9b56-153613271b73/f7f547fe-4e73-4784-9b56-153613271b73.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f7f547fe-4e73-4784-9b56-153613271b73/f7f547fe-4e73-4784-9b56-153613271b73.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f7f547fe-4e73-4784-9b56-153613271b73/f7f547fe-4e73-4784-9b56-153613271b73.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>U.S. Magistrate Judge Raymond E. Patricco denied Ashley Guillard’s motion to dismiss the defamation lawsuit brought by University of Idaho professor Rebecca Scofield, rejecting Guillard’s attempts to argue that the federal court lacked authority to...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[U.S. Magistrate Judge Raymond E. Patricco denied Ashley Guillard’s motion to dismiss the defamation lawsuit brought by University of Idaho professor Rebecca Scofield, rejecting Guillard’s attempts to argue that the federal court lacked authority to hear the case. Guillard, who represented herself, contended that the court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction and personal jurisdiction over her, that Idaho was the wrong venue because she lived in Texas and posted her TikTok videos from there, and that the judge had demonstrated bias against her spiritual and psychic beliefs. The court disagreed, finding that Guillard had intentionally directed her accusations toward an Idaho professor and an Idaho-centered murder case and that Scofield alleged she suffered the resulting reputational, professional and emotional harm in Idaho. The judge concluded that those contacts were sufficient for the Idaho federal court to exercise jurisdiction over Guillard and that Idaho was a proper venue for the lawsuit.<br /><br /><br />Patricco also rejected Guillard’s argument that the court had improperly judged the validity of her tarot readings or spiritual practices. The judge explained that the case was not about deciding whether psychic abilities or spiritual beliefs were real; it was about whether Guillard had made actionable defamatory statements about Scofield, including accusations that Scofield had been romantically involved with one of the murdered students and had arranged the killings. At the motion-to-dismiss stage, the court was required to accept Scofield’s well-pleaded allegations as true and determine whether they stated a legally viable defamation claim, not decide whether Guillard’s accusations were ultimately true. Patricco found that Scofield had adequately alleged defamation and ruled that Guillard’s disagreements with earlier court decisions did not establish judicial bias or justify throwing out the case. On November 13, 2023, he therefore denied Guillard’s motion to set aside the court’s prior rulings and denied her motion to dismiss, allowing Scofield’s lawsuit to continue.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3561</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The Tik Tok Tarot Card Reader And Her Wild Claims About The Murders In Moscow (8/12/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-tik-tok-tarot-card-reader-and-her-wild-claims-about-the-murders-in-moscow-8-12-26--73849600</link><description><![CDATA[In the chaotic weeks after the November 2022 murders of University of Idaho students Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, TikTok creator Ashley Guillard began posting videos in which she claimed that University of Idaho history professor Rebecca Scofield had been involved in the killings. Guillard said her accusations were based on tarot-card readings and what she described as spiritual intuition, rather than evidence produced by investigators. She went even further, falsely alleging that Scofield had been romantically involved with one of the victims and had orchestrated the murders to prevent that relationship from being exposed. Scofield had no connection to the killings, and police had not identified her as a suspect. Despite cease-and-desist demands, Guillard continued making the accusations and ultimately produced more than 100 videos promoting her theory. Scofield responded by filing a defamation lawsuit in December 2022, arguing that the allegations had damaged her reputation, caused severe emotional distress and exposed her to harassment and threats.<br /><br />The lawsuit eventually became a stark example of the real-world consequences of the rampant online speculation that surrounded the Moscow murder investigation. A federal judge ruled in 2024 that Guillard's claims were defamatory and unsupported by viable evidence, and the case later went before a jury to determine damages. In February 2026, a federal jury found Guillard liable and ordered her to pay Scofield $10 million, including $2.5 million in compensatory damages and $7.5 million in punitive damages. Guillard represented herself at trial and continued to maintain that she believed her psychic conclusions were accurate, even though Bryan Kohberger had already pleaded guilty to murdering the four students. Scofield testified that the accusations had severely affected her mental health, professional life and sense of personal security. The case ultimately illustrated one of the ugliest aspects of the online frenzy surrounding the Moscow murders: an innocent person had been publicly accused of participating in a quadruple homicide based not on forensic evidence, witness testimony or police work, but on a TikTok personality's tarot readings.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73849600</guid><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73849600/megatiktokpsychicaccusesprof.mp3" length="31899524" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5a5524cf-566e-4287-8169-05437e258d49/5a5524cf-566e-4287-8169-05437e258d49.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5a5524cf-566e-4287-8169-05437e258d49/5a5524cf-566e-4287-8169-05437e258d49.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5a5524cf-566e-4287-8169-05437e258d49/5a5524cf-566e-4287-8169-05437e258d49.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In the chaotic weeks after the November 2022 murders of University of Idaho students Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, TikTok creator Ashley Guillard began posting videos in which she claimed that University of Idaho...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In the chaotic weeks after the November 2022 murders of University of Idaho students Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, TikTok creator Ashley Guillard began posting videos in which she claimed that University of Idaho history professor Rebecca Scofield had been involved in the killings. Guillard said her accusations were based on tarot-card readings and what she described as spiritual intuition, rather than evidence produced by investigators. She went even further, falsely alleging that Scofield had been romantically involved with one of the victims and had orchestrated the murders to prevent that relationship from being exposed. Scofield had no connection to the killings, and police had not identified her as a suspect. Despite cease-and-desist demands, Guillard continued making the accusations and ultimately produced more than 100 videos promoting her theory. Scofield responded by filing a defamation lawsuit in December 2022, arguing that the allegations had damaged her reputation, caused severe emotional distress and exposed her to harassment and threats.<br /><br />The lawsuit eventually became a stark example of the real-world consequences of the rampant online speculation that surrounded the Moscow murder investigation. A federal judge ruled in 2024 that Guillard's claims were defamatory and unsupported by viable evidence, and the case later went before a jury to determine damages. In February 2026, a federal jury found Guillard liable and ordered her to pay Scofield $10 million, including $2.5 million in compensatory damages and $7.5 million in punitive damages. Guillard represented herself at trial and continued to maintain that she believed her psychic conclusions were accurate, even though Bryan Kohberger had already pleaded guilty to murdering the four students. Scofield testified that the accusations had severely affected her mental health, professional life and sense of personal security. The case ultimately illustrated one of the ugliest aspects of the online frenzy surrounding the Moscow murders: an innocent person had been publicly accused of participating in a quadruple homicide based not on forensic evidence, witness testimony or police work, but on a TikTok personality's tarot readings.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1994</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Murder In Moscow:  A Look Into The Life Of The Moscow 4 (Part 2)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-a-look-into-the-life-of-the-moscow-4-part-2--73849306</link><description><![CDATA[Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin had been living recognizable college lives filled with friendships, relationships, school, work and plans for the future before they were murdered in Moscow, Idaho, in November 2022. Mogen and Goncalves had been best friends since childhood and had remained inseparable through high school and into the University of Idaho, where they eventually lived together. Goncalves had recently purchased a Range Rover and had been preparing to move to Texas for a marketing job, while Mogen had worked hard academically and had made the dean’s list. Kernodle had endured a much more difficult childhood marked by instability and her parents’ struggles with drugs, but she had grown into an outgoing, optimistic young woman who appeared determined not to let those circumstances define her. At college she had built a close circle of friends and had begun dating Chapin, a popular 20-year-old student who was one of triplets and belonged to Sigma Chi. Chapin’s parents had visited him only about a week before the murders and had driven home believing their children were happily established in college and beginning their adult lives.<br /><br />On November 12, 2022, the four students had spent what initially appeared to be an ordinary Saturday night in Moscow. Mogen and Goncalves had gotten ready together before going to the Corner Club and later stopping at a food truck, while Kernodle and Chapin had attended a party at the nearby Sigma Chi fraternity house. Goncalves had only recently returned to Moscow, in part to show Mogen her new vehicle, making the visit one of the final chapters in a friendship that had lasted nearly a decade. The home on King Road had been known as a lively gathering place filled with music, friends and parties, fitting comfortably into a college town that had gone years without a homicide and was widely regarded as safe. By the following morning, however, Mogen, Goncalves, Kernodle and Chapin had all been killed inside the house, abruptly ending four young lives that had been moving in very different directions but had become closely intertwined at the University of Idaho. Their deaths transformed an ordinary college residence and a quiet community into the center of a massive murder investigation that would soon draw national attention.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br />https://www.vanityfair.com/style/2023/02/idaho-murders-victims-alleged-killer<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73849306</guid><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73849306/lifemoscow4prt2.mp3" length="22719050" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/09b3c964-215a-4229-9012-256a4d4042f5/09b3c964-215a-4229-9012-256a4d4042f5.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/09b3c964-215a-4229-9012-256a4d4042f5/09b3c964-215a-4229-9012-256a4d4042f5.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/09b3c964-215a-4229-9012-256a4d4042f5/09b3c964-215a-4229-9012-256a4d4042f5.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin had been living recognizable college lives filled with friendships, relationships, school, work and plans for the future before they were murdered in Moscow, Idaho, in November 2022....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin had been living recognizable college lives filled with friendships, relationships, school, work and plans for the future before they were murdered in Moscow, Idaho, in November 2022. Mogen and Goncalves had been best friends since childhood and had remained inseparable through high school and into the University of Idaho, where they eventually lived together. Goncalves had recently purchased a Range Rover and had been preparing to move to Texas for a marketing job, while Mogen had worked hard academically and had made the dean’s list. Kernodle had endured a much more difficult childhood marked by instability and her parents’ struggles with drugs, but she had grown into an outgoing, optimistic young woman who appeared determined not to let those circumstances define her. At college she had built a close circle of friends and had begun dating Chapin, a popular 20-year-old student who was one of triplets and belonged to Sigma Chi. Chapin’s parents had visited him only about a week before the murders and had driven home believing their children were happily established in college and beginning their adult lives.<br /><br />On November 12, 2022, the four students had spent what initially appeared to be an ordinary Saturday night in Moscow. Mogen and Goncalves had gotten ready together before going to the Corner Club and later stopping at a food truck, while Kernodle and Chapin had attended a party at the nearby Sigma Chi fraternity house. Goncalves had only recently returned to Moscow, in part to show Mogen her new vehicle, making the visit one of the final chapters in a friendship that had lasted nearly a decade. The home on King Road had been known as a lively gathering place filled with music, friends and parties, fitting comfortably into a college town that had gone years without a homicide and was widely regarded as safe. By the following morning, however, Mogen, Goncalves, Kernodle and Chapin had all been killed inside the house, abruptly ending four young lives that had been moving in very different directions but had become closely intertwined at the University of Idaho. Their deaths transformed an ordinary college residence and a quiet community into the center of a massive murder investigation that would soon draw national attention.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br />https://www.vanityfair.com/style/2023/02/idaho-murders-victims-alleged-killer<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1420</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Murder In Moscow:  A Look Into The Life Of The Moscow 4 (Part 1)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-a-look-into-the-life-of-the-moscow-4-part-1--73849307</link><description><![CDATA[Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin had been living recognizable college lives filled with friendships, relationships, school, work and plans for the future before they were murdered in Moscow, Idaho, in November 2022. Mogen and Goncalves had been best friends since childhood and had remained inseparable through high school and into the University of Idaho, where they eventually lived together. Goncalves had recently purchased a Range Rover and had been preparing to move to Texas for a marketing job, while Mogen had worked hard academically and had made the dean’s list. Kernodle had endured a much more difficult childhood marked by instability and her parents’ struggles with drugs, but she had grown into an outgoing, optimistic young woman who appeared determined not to let those circumstances define her. At college she had built a close circle of friends and had begun dating Chapin, a popular 20-year-old student who was one of triplets and belonged to Sigma Chi. Chapin’s parents had visited him only about a week before the murders and had driven home believing their children were happily established in college and beginning their adult lives.<br /><br />On November 12, 2022, the four students had spent what initially appeared to be an ordinary Saturday night in Moscow. Mogen and Goncalves had gotten ready together before going to the Corner Club and later stopping at a food truck, while Kernodle and Chapin had attended a party at the nearby Sigma Chi fraternity house. Goncalves had only recently returned to Moscow, in part to show Mogen her new vehicle, making the visit one of the final chapters in a friendship that had lasted nearly a decade. The home on King Road had been known as a lively gathering place filled with music, friends and parties, fitting comfortably into a college town that had gone years without a homicide and was widely regarded as safe. By the following morning, however, Mogen, Goncalves, Kernodle and Chapin had all been killed inside the house, abruptly ending four young lives that had been moving in very different directions but had become closely intertwined at the University of Idaho. Their deaths transformed an ordinary college residence and a quiet community into the center of a massive murder investigation that would soon draw national attention.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br />https://www.vanityfair.com/style/2023/02/idaho-murders-victims-alleged-killer<br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73849307</guid><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 02:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73849307/lifemoscow4prt1.mp3" length="19003393" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1223ec14-a2a5-410d-8fed-a4ef87b99605/1223ec14-a2a5-410d-8fed-a4ef87b99605.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1223ec14-a2a5-410d-8fed-a4ef87b99605/1223ec14-a2a5-410d-8fed-a4ef87b99605.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1223ec14-a2a5-410d-8fed-a4ef87b99605/1223ec14-a2a5-410d-8fed-a4ef87b99605.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin had been living recognizable college lives filled with friendships, relationships, school, work and plans for the future before they were murdered in Moscow, Idaho, in November 2022....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin had been living recognizable college lives filled with friendships, relationships, school, work and plans for the future before they were murdered in Moscow, Idaho, in November 2022. Mogen and Goncalves had been best friends since childhood and had remained inseparable through high school and into the University of Idaho, where they eventually lived together. Goncalves had recently purchased a Range Rover and had been preparing to move to Texas for a marketing job, while Mogen had worked hard academically and had made the dean’s list. Kernodle had endured a much more difficult childhood marked by instability and her parents’ struggles with drugs, but she had grown into an outgoing, optimistic young woman who appeared determined not to let those circumstances define her. At college she had built a close circle of friends and had begun dating Chapin, a popular 20-year-old student who was one of triplets and belonged to Sigma Chi. Chapin’s parents had visited him only about a week before the murders and had driven home believing their children were happily established in college and beginning their adult lives.<br /><br />On November 12, 2022, the four students had spent what initially appeared to be an ordinary Saturday night in Moscow. Mogen and Goncalves had gotten ready together before going to the Corner Club and later stopping at a food truck, while Kernodle and Chapin had attended a party at the nearby Sigma Chi fraternity house. Goncalves had only recently returned to Moscow, in part to show Mogen her new vehicle, making the visit one of the final chapters in a friendship that had lasted nearly a decade. The home on King Road had been known as a lively gathering place filled with music, friends and parties, fitting comfortably into a college town that had gone years without a homicide and was widely regarded as safe. By the following morning, however, Mogen, Goncalves, Kernodle and Chapin had all been killed inside the house, abruptly ending four young lives that had been moving in very different directions but had become closely intertwined at the University of Idaho. Their deaths transformed an ordinary college residence and a quiet community into the center of a massive murder investigation that would soon draw national attention.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br />https://www.vanityfair.com/style/2023/02/idaho-murders-victims-alleged-killer<br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1188</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Tyler Robinson Preliminary Hearing Transcripts (Day 1-Part 4) (8/12/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcripts-day-1-part-4-8-12-26--73852883</link><description><![CDATA[Day one of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing on July 6, 2026, largely centered on prosecutors beginning to construct a timeline of Charlie Kirk’s killing at Utah Valley University and establishing the authenticity of the surveillance footage and investigative records they intended to use against Robinson. Former UVU police officer Chris Bagley described the moment the gunshot rang out during Kirk’s September 10, 2025 event and the chaos that followed, while Utah State Bureau of Investigation agent David Hull walked the court through the enormous video-review effort undertaken after the shooting. Hull testified that investigators examined hundreds of hours of surveillance footage and ultimately tracked a person they believed was Robinson moving around the UVU campus at several different points that day. Prosecutors introduced surveillance recordings from multiple locations as they attempted to connect the person seen approaching the campus, moving toward the area surrounding the Losee Center, and later leaving the area to Robinson. Three separate videos depicting Kirk being shot were admitted, although Judge Tony Graf determined that their graphic nature warranted restricting their display to the attorneys’ and judge’s monitors rather than broadcasting them throughout the courtroom. Kirk’s widow, Erika, and his parents left the courtroom while the videos were reviewed. Prosecutors also introduced Kirk’s autopsy report through Hull, which listed his cause of death as a gunshot wound to the neck and the manner of death as homicide<br /><br />The defense spent much of the first day attacking the manner in which the prosecution was getting its evidence into the record rather than attempting to disprove the entire prosecution theory at that stage. Kathryn Nester and Robinson’s attorneys repeatedly raised hearsay, foundation and authentication objections, arguing that investigators were being permitted to introduce reports, statements and records created by other people without those individuals appearing personally to testify. Judge Graf overruled most of those objections, reflecting the substantially lower evidentiary threshold governing a Utah preliminary hearing, whose purpose was only to determine whether probable cause existed to send Robinson to trial rather than whether prosecutors could prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. One significant exception involved an edited compilation of surveillance footage, which Graf declined to admit in that form and required prosecutors to replace with the underlying unedited material. Hull’s testimony also revealed the scope of the prosecution’s surveillance theory: investigators claimed Robinson had appeared on or around the UVU campus multiple times on September 10 and that they were attempting to stitch those appearances together into a continuous identification of the alleged shooter. By the end of day one, prosecutors had established the killing itself, the medical cause of Kirk’s death, the existence and authenticity of substantial video evidence and the beginnings of their effort to identify Robinson as the person captured in that footage. They had not yet presented many of the pieces expected to become more consequential later in the hearing, including the rifle and DNA evidence, Robinson’s alleged communications and admissions, and testimony concerning his roommate Lance Twiggs.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73852883</guid><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73852883/robinsonprelimday1part4.mp3" length="11542822" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cc938b4f-f835-40d3-a8e3-0ecbadfdfbea/cc938b4f-f835-40d3-a8e3-0ecbadfdfbea.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cc938b4f-f835-40d3-a8e3-0ecbadfdfbea/cc938b4f-f835-40d3-a8e3-0ecbadfdfbea.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cc938b4f-f835-40d3-a8e3-0ecbadfdfbea/cc938b4f-f835-40d3-a8e3-0ecbadfdfbea.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Day one of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing on July 6, 2026, largely centered on prosecutors beginning to construct a timeline of Charlie Kirk’s killing at Utah Valley University and establishing the authenticity of the surveillance footage and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Day one of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing on July 6, 2026, largely centered on prosecutors beginning to construct a timeline of Charlie Kirk’s killing at Utah Valley University and establishing the authenticity of the surveillance footage and investigative records they intended to use against Robinson. Former UVU police officer Chris Bagley described the moment the gunshot rang out during Kirk’s September 10, 2025 event and the chaos that followed, while Utah State Bureau of Investigation agent David Hull walked the court through the enormous video-review effort undertaken after the shooting. Hull testified that investigators examined hundreds of hours of surveillance footage and ultimately tracked a person they believed was Robinson moving around the UVU campus at several different points that day. Prosecutors introduced surveillance recordings from multiple locations as they attempted to connect the person seen approaching the campus, moving toward the area surrounding the Losee Center, and later leaving the area to Robinson. Three separate videos depicting Kirk being shot were admitted, although Judge Tony Graf determined that their graphic nature warranted restricting their display to the attorneys’ and judge’s monitors rather than broadcasting them throughout the courtroom. Kirk’s widow, Erika, and his parents left the courtroom while the videos were reviewed. Prosecutors also introduced Kirk’s autopsy report through Hull, which listed his cause of death as a gunshot wound to the neck and the manner of death as homicide<br /><br />The defense spent much of the first day attacking the manner in which the prosecution was getting its evidence into the record rather than attempting to disprove the entire prosecution theory at that stage. Kathryn Nester and Robinson’s attorneys repeatedly raised hearsay, foundation and authentication objections, arguing that investigators were being permitted to introduce reports, statements and records created by other people without those individuals appearing personally to testify. Judge Graf overruled most of those objections, reflecting the substantially lower evidentiary threshold governing a Utah preliminary hearing, whose purpose was only to determine whether probable cause existed to send Robinson to trial rather than whether prosecutors could prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. One significant exception involved an edited compilation of surveillance footage, which Graf declined to admit in that form and required prosecutors to replace with the underlying unedited material. Hull’s testimony also revealed the scope of the prosecution’s surveillance theory: investigators claimed Robinson had appeared on or around the UVU campus multiple times on September 10 and that they were attempting to stitch those appearances together into a continuous identification of the alleged shooter. By the end of day one, prosecutors had established the killing itself, the medical cause of Kirk’s death, the existence and authenticity of substantial video evidence and the beginnings of their effort to identify Robinson as the person captured in that footage. They had not yet presented many of the pieces expected to become more consequential later in the hearing, including the rifle and DNA evidence, Robinson’s alleged communications and admissions, and testimony concerning his roommate Lance Twiggs.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>722</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvu</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The New Mexico Epstein Commission Interim Report (Part 9) (8/12/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-new-mexico-epstein-commission-interim-report-part-9-8-12-26--73826836</link><description><![CDATA[The New Mexico Survivors’ Truth Commission’s 119-page interim report described Zorro Ranch as a major and largely neglected component of Jeffrey Epstein’s broader operation, concluding that authorities failed for years to seriously investigate what happened there. According to the Commission, Epstein maintained an elaborate, highly controlled compound in New Mexico where survivors reported sexual abuse and where young women were routinely transported, housed and brought into Epstein’s orbit. The report pointed to witness testimony, flight records, seized electronic evidence and FBI material suggesting that Zorro Ranch was integrated into the same system of recruitment, secrecy and exploitation seen at Epstein’s other properties. Among the evidence discussed were computer folders labeled “ZORRO,” discs referencing nude photographs associated with the ranch, accounts of young women arriving by aircraft, efforts to impose restrictive nondisclosure agreements on workers, and survivor statements describing abuse in New Mexico. The Commission stressed that the evidence remained under review and that allegations involving individuals named in the report were not final findings of wrongdoing, but it said the existing record was already sufficient to show that Epstein’s activities in New Mexico deserved far more scrutiny than they ever received.<br /><br />The report was especially critical of institutional failures, saying New Mexico and federal authorities effectively passed responsibility to prosecutors elsewhere while Epstein’s conduct in the state went largely unexamined. It said the U.S. Attorney’s Office for New Mexico and state officials expected the Southern District of New York to handle Epstein, but New York prosecutors concentrated on crimes tied to New York and Florida rather than building a New Mexico case. Zorro Ranch was never searched while Epstein was alive and, according to the report, was not subjected to a comprehensive law-enforcement search until March 2026, nearly seven years after his death. The Commission concluded that this passivity allowed evidence to disappear, memories to fade and potential criminal cases to become more difficult or impossible to prosecute. It also opened separate lines of inquiry into Epstein’s financial dealings, his relationships with scientific institutions and wealthy associates, and the conduct of banks, including subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan. Its clearest interim observation was devastating: Epstein continued exercising wealth and influence after becoming a registered sex offender, operated much of his system in plain sight, and New Mexico law enforcement’s decision to rely on other jurisdictions left the conduct of Epstein and his co-conspirators in the state “unexamined and unpunished.” Final findings and recommendations were deferred while the Commission continued issuing subpoenas, interviewing witnesses and searching for additional survivors and potential perpetrators.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.nmlegis.gov/handouts/HISC%20080526%20Item%201%20Interim%20Report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">NM Survivors' Truth Commission — Interim Report</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73826836</guid><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73826836/nmreport9.mp3" length="12832226" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d5346fdb-c17b-4884-b657-ec37b2ec1e6e/d5346fdb-c17b-4884-b657-ec37b2ec1e6e.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d5346fdb-c17b-4884-b657-ec37b2ec1e6e/d5346fdb-c17b-4884-b657-ec37b2ec1e6e.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d5346fdb-c17b-4884-b657-ec37b2ec1e6e/d5346fdb-c17b-4884-b657-ec37b2ec1e6e.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The New Mexico Survivors’ Truth Commission’s 119-page interim report described Zorro Ranch as a major and largely neglected component of Jeffrey Epstein’s broader operation, concluding that authorities failed for years to seriously investigate what...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The New Mexico Survivors’ Truth Commission’s 119-page interim report described Zorro Ranch as a major and largely neglected component of Jeffrey Epstein’s broader operation, concluding that authorities failed for years to seriously investigate what happened there. According to the Commission, Epstein maintained an elaborate, highly controlled compound in New Mexico where survivors reported sexual abuse and where young women were routinely transported, housed and brought into Epstein’s orbit. The report pointed to witness testimony, flight records, seized electronic evidence and FBI material suggesting that Zorro Ranch was integrated into the same system of recruitment, secrecy and exploitation seen at Epstein’s other properties. Among the evidence discussed were computer folders labeled “ZORRO,” discs referencing nude photographs associated with the ranch, accounts of young women arriving by aircraft, efforts to impose restrictive nondisclosure agreements on workers, and survivor statements describing abuse in New Mexico. The Commission stressed that the evidence remained under review and that allegations involving individuals named in the report were not final findings of wrongdoing, but it said the existing record was already sufficient to show that Epstein’s activities in New Mexico deserved far more scrutiny than they ever received.<br /><br />The report was especially critical of institutional failures, saying New Mexico and federal authorities effectively passed responsibility to prosecutors elsewhere while Epstein’s conduct in the state went largely unexamined. It said the U.S. Attorney’s Office for New Mexico and state officials expected the Southern District of New York to handle Epstein, but New York prosecutors concentrated on crimes tied to New York and Florida rather than building a New Mexico case. Zorro Ranch was never searched while Epstein was alive and, according to the report, was not subjected to a comprehensive law-enforcement search until March 2026, nearly seven years after his death. The Commission concluded that this passivity allowed evidence to disappear, memories to fade and potential criminal cases to become more difficult or impossible to prosecute. It also opened separate lines of inquiry into Epstein’s financial dealings, his relationships with scientific institutions and wealthy associates, and the conduct of banks, including subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan. Its clearest interim observation was devastating: Epstein continued exercising wealth and influence after becoming a registered sex offender, operated much of his system in plain sight, and New Mexico law enforcement’s decision to rely on other jurisdictions left the conduct of Epstein and his co-conspirators in the state “unexamined and unpunished.” Final findings and recommendations were deferred while the Commission continued issuing subpoenas, interviewing witnesses and searching for additional survivors and potential perpetrators.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.nmlegis.gov/handouts/HISC%20080526%20Item%201%20Interim%20Report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">NM Survivors' Truth Commission — Interim Report</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>802</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The New Mexico Epstein Commission Interim Report (Part 8) (8/12/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-new-mexico-epstein-commission-interim-report-part-8-8-12-26--73826835</link><description><![CDATA[The New Mexico Survivors’ Truth Commission’s 119-page interim report described Zorro Ranch as a major and largely neglected component of Jeffrey Epstein’s broader operation, concluding that authorities failed for years to seriously investigate what happened there. According to the Commission, Epstein maintained an elaborate, highly controlled compound in New Mexico where survivors reported sexual abuse and where young women were routinely transported, housed and brought into Epstein’s orbit. The report pointed to witness testimony, flight records, seized electronic evidence and FBI material suggesting that Zorro Ranch was integrated into the same system of recruitment, secrecy and exploitation seen at Epstein’s other properties. Among the evidence discussed were computer folders labeled “ZORRO,” discs referencing nude photographs associated with the ranch, accounts of young women arriving by aircraft, efforts to impose restrictive nondisclosure agreements on workers, and survivor statements describing abuse in New Mexico. The Commission stressed that the evidence remained under review and that allegations involving individuals named in the report were not final findings of wrongdoing, but it said the existing record was already sufficient to show that Epstein’s activities in New Mexico deserved far more scrutiny than they ever received.<br /><br />The report was especially critical of institutional failures, saying New Mexico and federal authorities effectively passed responsibility to prosecutors elsewhere while Epstein’s conduct in the state went largely unexamined. It said the U.S. Attorney’s Office for New Mexico and state officials expected the Southern District of New York to handle Epstein, but New York prosecutors concentrated on crimes tied to New York and Florida rather than building a New Mexico case. Zorro Ranch was never searched while Epstein was alive and, according to the report, was not subjected to a comprehensive law-enforcement search until March 2026, nearly seven years after his death. The Commission concluded that this passivity allowed evidence to disappear, memories to fade and potential criminal cases to become more difficult or impossible to prosecute. It also opened separate lines of inquiry into Epstein’s financial dealings, his relationships with scientific institutions and wealthy associates, and the conduct of banks, including subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan. Its clearest interim observation was devastating: Epstein continued exercising wealth and influence after becoming a registered sex offender, operated much of his system in plain sight, and New Mexico law enforcement’s decision to rely on other jurisdictions left the conduct of Epstein and his co-conspirators in the state “unexamined and unpunished.” Final findings and recommendations were deferred while the Commission continued issuing subpoenas, interviewing witnesses and searching for additional survivors and potential perpetrators.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.nmlegis.gov/handouts/HISC%20080526%20Item%201%20Interim%20Report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">NM Survivors' Truth Commission — Interim Report</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73826835</guid><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73826835/nmreport8.mp3" length="11277000" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5427e926-421f-480c-aaf9-2f33fd975774/5427e926-421f-480c-aaf9-2f33fd975774.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5427e926-421f-480c-aaf9-2f33fd975774/5427e926-421f-480c-aaf9-2f33fd975774.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5427e926-421f-480c-aaf9-2f33fd975774/5427e926-421f-480c-aaf9-2f33fd975774.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The New Mexico Survivors’ Truth Commission’s 119-page interim report described Zorro Ranch as a major and largely neglected component of Jeffrey Epstein’s broader operation, concluding that authorities failed for years to seriously investigate what...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The New Mexico Survivors’ Truth Commission’s 119-page interim report described Zorro Ranch as a major and largely neglected component of Jeffrey Epstein’s broader operation, concluding that authorities failed for years to seriously investigate what happened there. According to the Commission, Epstein maintained an elaborate, highly controlled compound in New Mexico where survivors reported sexual abuse and where young women were routinely transported, housed and brought into Epstein’s orbit. The report pointed to witness testimony, flight records, seized electronic evidence and FBI material suggesting that Zorro Ranch was integrated into the same system of recruitment, secrecy and exploitation seen at Epstein’s other properties. Among the evidence discussed were computer folders labeled “ZORRO,” discs referencing nude photographs associated with the ranch, accounts of young women arriving by aircraft, efforts to impose restrictive nondisclosure agreements on workers, and survivor statements describing abuse in New Mexico. The Commission stressed that the evidence remained under review and that allegations involving individuals named in the report were not final findings of wrongdoing, but it said the existing record was already sufficient to show that Epstein’s activities in New Mexico deserved far more scrutiny than they ever received.<br /><br />The report was especially critical of institutional failures, saying New Mexico and federal authorities effectively passed responsibility to prosecutors elsewhere while Epstein’s conduct in the state went largely unexamined. It said the U.S. Attorney’s Office for New Mexico and state officials expected the Southern District of New York to handle Epstein, but New York prosecutors concentrated on crimes tied to New York and Florida rather than building a New Mexico case. Zorro Ranch was never searched while Epstein was alive and, according to the report, was not subjected to a comprehensive law-enforcement search until March 2026, nearly seven years after his death. The Commission concluded that this passivity allowed evidence to disappear, memories to fade and potential criminal cases to become more difficult or impossible to prosecute. It also opened separate lines of inquiry into Epstein’s financial dealings, his relationships with scientific institutions and wealthy associates, and the conduct of banks, including subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan. Its clearest interim observation was devastating: Epstein continued exercising wealth and influence after becoming a registered sex offender, operated much of his system in plain sight, and New Mexico law enforcement’s decision to rely on other jurisdictions left the conduct of Epstein and his co-conspirators in the state “unexamined and unpunished.” Final findings and recommendations were deferred while the Commission continued issuing subpoenas, interviewing witnesses and searching for additional survivors and potential perpetrators.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.nmlegis.gov/handouts/HISC%20080526%20Item%201%20Interim%20Report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">NM Survivors' Truth Commission — Interim Report</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>705</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Murder In Moscow:  The Autopsy Findings in the Murders of Madison, Kaylee, Xana and Ethan (Part 2) (8/12/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-the-autopsy-findings-in-the-murders-of-madison-kaylee-xana-and-ethan-part-2-8-12-26--73849378</link><description><![CDATA[The autopsy reports for University of Idaho students Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin documented the extraordinary violence of the November 13, 2022 murders inside the King Road residence in Moscow. Spokane County Chief Medical Examiner Dr. Veena Singh determined that all four died from multiple sharp-force injuries consistent with a large fixed-blade knife, including a weapon such as the Ka-Bar prosecutors said was used in the killings. Mogen suffered 28 stab wounds, including extensive injuries to her face, neck and upper body that damaged major blood vessels, a lung and her liver. Chapin suffered fewer wounds than the three women, but his injuries included devastating wounds to the neck and major blood vessels, including one wound reportedly measuring approximately seven inches deep. Singh concluded that all four victims experienced a high degree of pain or suffering before death, although Chapin's suffering was assessed as occurring to a lesser degree than that of the other victims.<br /><br />The reports provided particularly disturbing new details about Kernodle and Goncalves. Kernodle suffered numerous wounds across her head, neck, chest, abdomen, back and extremities, including injuries to her heart, lung and major blood vessels, and her autopsy was the only one that specifically identified injuries consistent with defensive wounds, supporting the conclusion that she attempted to fight off her attacker. Goncalves suffered a combination of sharp-force and blunt-force trauma that the medical examiner described as more severe in certain respects than the injuries suffered by the others; her injuries included bleeding around the brain, a fractured nose, significant facial trauma and a knocked-out tooth, as well as evidence suggesting that an object had been pressed across her mouth. Taken together, the newly disclosed autopsy findings provided a much clearer medical picture of what occurred inside the house and demonstrated that this was not simply a series of quick fatal stab wounds, but an exceptionally violent attack in which the four victims suffered extensive and, in some cases, markedly different injuries before their deaths.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hFN8NIvmLwTktmiOCrSwFdHPOrW2x_V-/view?pli=1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">012725+Exhibits+S-1+and+S-1+a-e+to+States+Supp+Resp+to+Rqst+for+Disc+RE+Penalty+Phase+Experts.pdf - Google Drive</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73849378</guid><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 18:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73849378/moscowautopsyreport2.mp3" length="10535541" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/15b1bc8f-c0fa-41eb-867e-51a4a42e3b21/15b1bc8f-c0fa-41eb-867e-51a4a42e3b21.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/15b1bc8f-c0fa-41eb-867e-51a4a42e3b21/15b1bc8f-c0fa-41eb-867e-51a4a42e3b21.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/15b1bc8f-c0fa-41eb-867e-51a4a42e3b21/15b1bc8f-c0fa-41eb-867e-51a4a42e3b21.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The autopsy reports for University of Idaho students Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin documented the extraordinary violence of the November 13, 2022 murders inside the King Road residence in Moscow. Spokane County Chief...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The autopsy reports for University of Idaho students Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin documented the extraordinary violence of the November 13, 2022 murders inside the King Road residence in Moscow. Spokane County Chief Medical Examiner Dr. Veena Singh determined that all four died from multiple sharp-force injuries consistent with a large fixed-blade knife, including a weapon such as the Ka-Bar prosecutors said was used in the killings. Mogen suffered 28 stab wounds, including extensive injuries to her face, neck and upper body that damaged major blood vessels, a lung and her liver. Chapin suffered fewer wounds than the three women, but his injuries included devastating wounds to the neck and major blood vessels, including one wound reportedly measuring approximately seven inches deep. Singh concluded that all four victims experienced a high degree of pain or suffering before death, although Chapin's suffering was assessed as occurring to a lesser degree than that of the other victims.<br /><br />The reports provided particularly disturbing new details about Kernodle and Goncalves. Kernodle suffered numerous wounds across her head, neck, chest, abdomen, back and extremities, including injuries to her heart, lung and major blood vessels, and her autopsy was the only one that specifically identified injuries consistent with defensive wounds, supporting the conclusion that she attempted to fight off her attacker. Goncalves suffered a combination of sharp-force and blunt-force trauma that the medical examiner described as more severe in certain respects than the injuries suffered by the others; her injuries included bleeding around the brain, a fractured nose, significant facial trauma and a knocked-out tooth, as well as evidence suggesting that an object had been pressed across her mouth. Taken together, the newly disclosed autopsy findings provided a much clearer medical picture of what occurred inside the house and demonstrated that this was not simply a series of quick fatal stab wounds, but an exceptionally violent attack in which the four victims suffered extensive and, in some cases, markedly different injuries before their deaths.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hFN8NIvmLwTktmiOCrSwFdHPOrW2x_V-/view?pli=1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">012725+Exhibits+S-1+and+S-1+a-e+to+States+Supp+Resp+to+Rqst+for+Disc+RE+Penalty+Phase+Experts.pdf - Google Drive</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>659</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and the Royal Funeral Controversy (8/12/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/andrew-mountbatten-windsor-and-the-royal-funeral-controversy-8-12-26--73826849</link><description><![CDATA[Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor faced a new wave of criticism after reports claimed that government contingency plans still provided for him to receive a ceremonial royal funeral despite his dramatic fall from public life. According to the reporting, Andrew remained included in confidential Whitehall “bridge” plans that had apparently not been updated to reflect the loss of his military affiliations, royal patronages and remaining titles. The revelation prompted criticism from politicians, commentators and taxpayer advocates who argued that a publicly supported ceremonial funeral would be inappropriate for someone who was now effectively a private citizen. The controversy was intensified by Andrew’s longstanding association with Jeffrey Epstein, Virginia Giuffre’s civil allegations against him, which Andrew denied and later settled without admitting liability, and more recent controversies surrounding the former prince. IBTimes noted, however, that it had not independently verified the reported funeral plans and that both Buckingham Palace and the Cabinet Office declined to comment.<br /><br />Royal commentators suggested the situation was more likely the result of outdated government paperwork than evidence that Andrew had actually been promised an elaborate taxpayer-funded funeral. Royal historian Rafe Heydel-Mankoo argued that any final decision was probably years away and could ultimately fall to Prince William if he became king, while commentator Richard Fitzwilliams described the prospect of a royal funeral for Andrew as “preposterous” given his diminished status. Fitzwilliams also argued that taxpayers would have little appetite for financing such an event, particularly given Andrew’s extremely poor standing with the British public. The broader dispute therefore became another example of the monarchy struggling to reconcile traditional royal protocols with Andrew’s unprecedented disgrace and removal from official royal life. Critics maintained that whenever his funeral eventually occurred, it should be treated as a private matter and privately funded rather than allowing Andrew to receive ceremonial honors associated with the position he once held.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73826849</guid><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73826849/andrewroyalfuneral.mp3" length="12495769" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/046db946-ddcb-4aab-a4a6-f22459e37c7a/046db946-ddcb-4aab-a4a6-f22459e37c7a.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/046db946-ddcb-4aab-a4a6-f22459e37c7a/046db946-ddcb-4aab-a4a6-f22459e37c7a.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/046db946-ddcb-4aab-a4a6-f22459e37c7a/046db946-ddcb-4aab-a4a6-f22459e37c7a.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor faced a new wave of criticism after reports claimed that government contingency plans still provided for him to receive a ceremonial royal funeral despite his dramatic fall from public life. According to the reporting,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor faced a new wave of criticism after reports claimed that government contingency plans still provided for him to receive a ceremonial royal funeral despite his dramatic fall from public life. According to the reporting, Andrew remained included in confidential Whitehall “bridge” plans that had apparently not been updated to reflect the loss of his military affiliations, royal patronages and remaining titles. The revelation prompted criticism from politicians, commentators and taxpayer advocates who argued that a publicly supported ceremonial funeral would be inappropriate for someone who was now effectively a private citizen. The controversy was intensified by Andrew’s longstanding association with Jeffrey Epstein, Virginia Giuffre’s civil allegations against him, which Andrew denied and later settled without admitting liability, and more recent controversies surrounding the former prince. IBTimes noted, however, that it had not independently verified the reported funeral plans and that both Buckingham Palace and the Cabinet Office declined to comment.<br /><br />Royal commentators suggested the situation was more likely the result of outdated government paperwork than evidence that Andrew had actually been promised an elaborate taxpayer-funded funeral. Royal historian Rafe Heydel-Mankoo argued that any final decision was probably years away and could ultimately fall to Prince William if he became king, while commentator Richard Fitzwilliams described the prospect of a royal funeral for Andrew as “preposterous” given his diminished status. Fitzwilliams also argued that taxpayers would have little appetite for financing such an event, particularly given Andrew’s extremely poor standing with the British public. The broader dispute therefore became another example of the monarchy struggling to reconcile traditional royal protocols with Andrew’s unprecedented disgrace and removal from official royal life. Critics maintained that whenever his funeral eventually occurred, it should be treated as a private matter and privately funded rather than allowing Andrew to receive ceremonial honors associated with the position he once held.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>781</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Jeffrey Epstein and the Investigation That Never Expanded (Part 4) (8/12/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/jeffrey-epstein-and-the-investigation-that-never-expanded-part-4-8-12-26--73782391</link><description><![CDATA[From the earliest federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein, the scope appeared strikingly narrow compared with the breadth of the conduct surrounding him. Investigators had evidence pointing beyond Epstein himself: recruiters who helped bring young women and girls into his orbit, employees who facilitated access to his properties, financial institutions that processed enormous sums of money, pilots who transported Epstein and his associates, and a network of powerful people who repeatedly appeared around him. Yet the federal response repeatedly centered on Epstein as an individual offender rather than treating the operation surrounding him as a potentially sprawling criminal enterprise. The extraordinarily broad non-prosecution agreement reached in Florida reinforced that approach by extending protection to unnamed potential co-conspirators instead of using those individuals as investigative pressure points. When Epstein was arrested again in 2019, prosecutors charged him with sex trafficking conspiracy and sex trafficking, but his death brought the criminal case against him to an abrupt end. Ghislaine Maxwell was later prosecuted and convicted, but the broader question remained: why had a network that operated across multiple jurisdictions for years produced so few federal prosecutions? Taken together, the history created the appearance of an investigation designed to establish responsibility for specific defendants rather than systematically identify every facilitator, recruiter, financial enabler, participant, and potential co-conspirator connected to Epstein's operation.<br /><br />The DOJ also had an extensive collection of investigative and prosecutorial tools available that could have supported a much broader inquiry. Federal authorities could pursue conspiracy charges, money-laundering statutes, financial-record subpoenas, grand-jury testimony, immunity agreements, cooperation deals, immigration and visa investigations, tax inquiries, asset-forfeiture proceedings, obstruction cases, and, where the evidence satisfied the statutory requirements, potentially racketeering theories aimed at an ongoing enterprise rather than isolated crimes. Following Epstein's money alone could have provided investigators with a roadmap through banks, corporations, trusts, shell entities, property transactions, payments to associates, and transfers involving victims or recruiters. Aggressively flipping lower-level participants could likewise have helped prosecutors work upward through the organization instead of stopping with its most recognizable figures. None of that automatically would have produced charges against every person associated with Epstein, because association itself was not evidence of criminal conduct, but the striking issue was how rarely the government's enormous investigative arsenal appeared to be deployed publicly toward dismantling the entire ecosystem that allowed Epstein's abuse to continue. The enduring criticism, therefore, was not simply that prosecutors failed to charge more people; it was that the government never demonstrated the kind of relentless, enterprise-wide investigation routinely employed against organized crime, trafficking organizations, fraud rings, and other complex criminal networks.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73782391</guid><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73782391/epsteininvestigationfailure4.mp3" length="14883570" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1501adc8-e91d-40ee-bb05-1e4a4ff4c90b/1501adc8-e91d-40ee-bb05-1e4a4ff4c90b.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1501adc8-e91d-40ee-bb05-1e4a4ff4c90b/1501adc8-e91d-40ee-bb05-1e4a4ff4c90b.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1501adc8-e91d-40ee-bb05-1e4a4ff4c90b/1501adc8-e91d-40ee-bb05-1e4a4ff4c90b.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>From the earliest federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein, the scope appeared strikingly narrow compared with the breadth of the conduct surrounding him. Investigators had evidence pointing beyond Epstein himself: recruiters who helped bring young...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[From the earliest federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein, the scope appeared strikingly narrow compared with the breadth of the conduct surrounding him. Investigators had evidence pointing beyond Epstein himself: recruiters who helped bring young women and girls into his orbit, employees who facilitated access to his properties, financial institutions that processed enormous sums of money, pilots who transported Epstein and his associates, and a network of powerful people who repeatedly appeared around him. Yet the federal response repeatedly centered on Epstein as an individual offender rather than treating the operation surrounding him as a potentially sprawling criminal enterprise. The extraordinarily broad non-prosecution agreement reached in Florida reinforced that approach by extending protection to unnamed potential co-conspirators instead of using those individuals as investigative pressure points. When Epstein was arrested again in 2019, prosecutors charged him with sex trafficking conspiracy and sex trafficking, but his death brought the criminal case against him to an abrupt end. Ghislaine Maxwell was later prosecuted and convicted, but the broader question remained: why had a network that operated across multiple jurisdictions for years produced so few federal prosecutions? Taken together, the history created the appearance of an investigation designed to establish responsibility for specific defendants rather than systematically identify every facilitator, recruiter, financial enabler, participant, and potential co-conspirator connected to Epstein's operation.<br /><br />The DOJ also had an extensive collection of investigative and prosecutorial tools available that could have supported a much broader inquiry. Federal authorities could pursue conspiracy charges, money-laundering statutes, financial-record subpoenas, grand-jury testimony, immunity agreements, cooperation deals, immigration and visa investigations, tax inquiries, asset-forfeiture proceedings, obstruction cases, and, where the evidence satisfied the statutory requirements, potentially racketeering theories aimed at an ongoing enterprise rather than isolated crimes. Following Epstein's money alone could have provided investigators with a roadmap through banks, corporations, trusts, shell entities, property transactions, payments to associates, and transfers involving victims or recruiters. Aggressively flipping lower-level participants could likewise have helped prosecutors work upward through the organization instead of stopping with its most recognizable figures. None of that automatically would have produced charges against every person associated with Epstein, because association itself was not evidence of criminal conduct, but the striking issue was how rarely the government's enormous investigative arsenal appeared to be deployed publicly toward dismantling the entire ecosystem that allowed Epstein's abuse to continue. The enduring criticism, therefore, was not simply that prosecutors failed to charge more people; it was that the government never demonstrated the kind of relentless, enterprise-wide investigation routinely employed against organized crime, trafficking organizations, fraud rings, and other complex criminal networks.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>931</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Jeffrey Epstein and the Investigation That Never Expanded (Part 3) (8/12/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/jeffrey-epstein-and-the-investigation-that-never-expanded-part-3-8-12-26--73782392</link><description><![CDATA[From the earliest federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein, the scope appeared strikingly narrow compared with the breadth of the conduct surrounding him. Investigators had evidence pointing beyond Epstein himself: recruiters who helped bring young women and girls into his orbit, employees who facilitated access to his properties, financial institutions that processed enormous sums of money, pilots who transported Epstein and his associates, and a network of powerful people who repeatedly appeared around him. Yet the federal response repeatedly centered on Epstein as an individual offender rather than treating the operation surrounding him as a potentially sprawling criminal enterprise. The extraordinarily broad non-prosecution agreement reached in Florida reinforced that approach by extending protection to unnamed potential co-conspirators instead of using those individuals as investigative pressure points. When Epstein was arrested again in 2019, prosecutors charged him with sex trafficking conspiracy and sex trafficking, but his death brought the criminal case against him to an abrupt end. Ghislaine Maxwell was later prosecuted and convicted, but the broader question remained: why had a network that operated across multiple jurisdictions for years produced so few federal prosecutions? Taken together, the history created the appearance of an investigation designed to establish responsibility for specific defendants rather than systematically identify every facilitator, recruiter, financial enabler, participant, and potential co-conspirator connected to Epstein's operation.<br /><br />The DOJ also had an extensive collection of investigative and prosecutorial tools available that could have supported a much broader inquiry. Federal authorities could pursue conspiracy charges, money-laundering statutes, financial-record subpoenas, grand-jury testimony, immunity agreements, cooperation deals, immigration and visa investigations, tax inquiries, asset-forfeiture proceedings, obstruction cases, and, where the evidence satisfied the statutory requirements, potentially racketeering theories aimed at an ongoing enterprise rather than isolated crimes. Following Epstein's money alone could have provided investigators with a roadmap through banks, corporations, trusts, shell entities, property transactions, payments to associates, and transfers involving victims or recruiters. Aggressively flipping lower-level participants could likewise have helped prosecutors work upward through the organization instead of stopping with its most recognizable figures. None of that automatically would have produced charges against every person associated with Epstein, because association itself was not evidence of criminal conduct, but the striking issue was how rarely the government's enormous investigative arsenal appeared to be deployed publicly toward dismantling the entire ecosystem that allowed Epstein's abuse to continue. The enduring criticism, therefore, was not simply that prosecutors failed to charge more people; it was that the government never demonstrated the kind of relentless, enterprise-wide investigation routinely employed against organized crime, trafficking organizations, fraud rings, and other complex criminal networks.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73782392</guid><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73782392/epsteininvestigationfailure3.mp3" length="11880533" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a25739a6-1e69-4b96-9060-097463dbb4e5/a25739a6-1e69-4b96-9060-097463dbb4e5.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a25739a6-1e69-4b96-9060-097463dbb4e5/a25739a6-1e69-4b96-9060-097463dbb4e5.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a25739a6-1e69-4b96-9060-097463dbb4e5/a25739a6-1e69-4b96-9060-097463dbb4e5.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>From the earliest federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein, the scope appeared strikingly narrow compared with the breadth of the conduct surrounding him. Investigators had evidence pointing beyond Epstein himself: recruiters who helped bring young...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[From the earliest federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein, the scope appeared strikingly narrow compared with the breadth of the conduct surrounding him. Investigators had evidence pointing beyond Epstein himself: recruiters who helped bring young women and girls into his orbit, employees who facilitated access to his properties, financial institutions that processed enormous sums of money, pilots who transported Epstein and his associates, and a network of powerful people who repeatedly appeared around him. Yet the federal response repeatedly centered on Epstein as an individual offender rather than treating the operation surrounding him as a potentially sprawling criminal enterprise. The extraordinarily broad non-prosecution agreement reached in Florida reinforced that approach by extending protection to unnamed potential co-conspirators instead of using those individuals as investigative pressure points. When Epstein was arrested again in 2019, prosecutors charged him with sex trafficking conspiracy and sex trafficking, but his death brought the criminal case against him to an abrupt end. Ghislaine Maxwell was later prosecuted and convicted, but the broader question remained: why had a network that operated across multiple jurisdictions for years produced so few federal prosecutions? Taken together, the history created the appearance of an investigation designed to establish responsibility for specific defendants rather than systematically identify every facilitator, recruiter, financial enabler, participant, and potential co-conspirator connected to Epstein's operation.<br /><br />The DOJ also had an extensive collection of investigative and prosecutorial tools available that could have supported a much broader inquiry. Federal authorities could pursue conspiracy charges, money-laundering statutes, financial-record subpoenas, grand-jury testimony, immunity agreements, cooperation deals, immigration and visa investigations, tax inquiries, asset-forfeiture proceedings, obstruction cases, and, where the evidence satisfied the statutory requirements, potentially racketeering theories aimed at an ongoing enterprise rather than isolated crimes. Following Epstein's money alone could have provided investigators with a roadmap through banks, corporations, trusts, shell entities, property transactions, payments to associates, and transfers involving victims or recruiters. Aggressively flipping lower-level participants could likewise have helped prosecutors work upward through the organization instead of stopping with its most recognizable figures. None of that automatically would have produced charges against every person associated with Epstein, because association itself was not evidence of criminal conduct, but the striking issue was how rarely the government's enormous investigative arsenal appeared to be deployed publicly toward dismantling the entire ecosystem that allowed Epstein's abuse to continue. The enduring criticism, therefore, was not simply that prosecutors failed to charge more people; it was that the government never demonstrated the kind of relentless, enterprise-wide investigation routinely employed against organized crime, trafficking organizations, fraud rings, and other complex criminal networks.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>743</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Bryan Kohberger And The Knife Authorties Say He Used During The Murders (8/12/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-the-knife-authorties-say-he-used-during-the-murders-8-12-26--73825337</link><description><![CDATA[Officials said Bryan Kohberger used a large fixed-blade knife to murder Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin inside the King Road house on November 13, 2022. The most important clue pointing investigators toward the type of weapon was the tan leather knife sheath found on the bed beside Mogen. The sheath carried Ka-Bar and U.S. Marine Corps markings, leading investigators to believe the killer had used a military-style Ka-Bar knife or a similar fixed-blade weapon. Prosecutors later disclosed evidence indicating that Kohberger had purchased a Ka-Bar knife and sheath online months before the murders, strengthening their theory about the weapon used in the attack. The sheath also became one of the most important pieces of physical evidence in the case because investigators recovered male DNA from its button snap that was ultimately linked to Kohberger. Despite the extensive injuries suffered by all four victims and the evidence pointing toward a large knife, investigators never recovered the actual murder weapon.<br /><br />Finding that knife became an important part of the investigation after the killings. Authorities searched Kohberger’s apartment in Washington, his office, his Hyundai Elantra and his family’s property in Pennsylvania, while investigators reconstructed his movements before and after the murders using surveillance footage, cellphone information and other evidence. According to the prosecution’s reconstruction, Kohberger left Moscow after the killings and drove an indirect route through rural areas before eventually returning to Pullman, creating numerous possible places where the knife could have been discarded or hidden. Investigators searched for evidence that might reveal where the weapon went, but no knife was ever publicly identified as the murder weapon. That left the sheath discovered at King Road as the strongest physical remnant of the weapon authorities believed had been carried into the house. By the conclusion of the case, prosecutors had built their theory around the Ka-Bar-style knife, Kohberger’s alleged purchase of such a weapon and the DNA recovered from the abandoned sheath, even though the knife itself remained missing.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73825337</guid><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73825337/megakohknifeusedduringthecrimes.mp3" length="34969017" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1152f88f-6b12-4c5a-a7ff-5a71cde70b28/1152f88f-6b12-4c5a-a7ff-5a71cde70b28.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1152f88f-6b12-4c5a-a7ff-5a71cde70b28/1152f88f-6b12-4c5a-a7ff-5a71cde70b28.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1152f88f-6b12-4c5a-a7ff-5a71cde70b28/1152f88f-6b12-4c5a-a7ff-5a71cde70b28.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Officials said Bryan Kohberger used a large fixed-blade knife to murder Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin inside the King Road house on November 13, 2022. The most important clue pointing investigators toward the type of...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Officials said Bryan Kohberger used a large fixed-blade knife to murder Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin inside the King Road house on November 13, 2022. The most important clue pointing investigators toward the type of weapon was the tan leather knife sheath found on the bed beside Mogen. The sheath carried Ka-Bar and U.S. Marine Corps markings, leading investigators to believe the killer had used a military-style Ka-Bar knife or a similar fixed-blade weapon. Prosecutors later disclosed evidence indicating that Kohberger had purchased a Ka-Bar knife and sheath online months before the murders, strengthening their theory about the weapon used in the attack. The sheath also became one of the most important pieces of physical evidence in the case because investigators recovered male DNA from its button snap that was ultimately linked to Kohberger. Despite the extensive injuries suffered by all four victims and the evidence pointing toward a large knife, investigators never recovered the actual murder weapon.<br /><br />Finding that knife became an important part of the investigation after the killings. Authorities searched Kohberger’s apartment in Washington, his office, his Hyundai Elantra and his family’s property in Pennsylvania, while investigators reconstructed his movements before and after the murders using surveillance footage, cellphone information and other evidence. According to the prosecution’s reconstruction, Kohberger left Moscow after the killings and drove an indirect route through rural areas before eventually returning to Pullman, creating numerous possible places where the knife could have been discarded or hidden. Investigators searched for evidence that might reveal where the weapon went, but no knife was ever publicly identified as the murder weapon. That left the sheath discovered at King Road as the strongest physical remnant of the weapon authorities believed had been carried into the house. By the conclusion of the case, prosecutors had built their theory around the Ka-Bar-style knife, Kohberger’s alleged purchase of such a weapon and the DNA recovered from the abandoned sheath, even though the knife itself remained missing.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2186</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition: Bryan Kohberger And The Surveillance Operation (8/12/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-the-surveillance-operation-8-12-26--73825336</link><description><![CDATA[The surveillance operation that helped authorities close in on Bryan Kohberger began after investigators connected a white Hyundai Elantra seen repeatedly on surveillance cameras near 1122 King Road to a similar vehicle registered to Kohberger, then a criminology doctoral student at Washington State University. Police had collected video from residences, businesses and traffic cameras showing the white sedan moving through Moscow around the time Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin were murdered on November 13, 2022, and investigators later traced Kohberger’s Elantra back to Washington State University. Cellphone records added another layer, showing movements investigators believed were consistent with the vehicle’s route before and after the killings. When Kohberger and his father drove the Elantra from Washington to the family home in Pennsylvania in December, authorities were able to trace portions of that cross-country trip through license-plate readers, surveillance footage and other records. By the time Kohberger arrived in Pennsylvania on December 16, investigators had developed him into a major suspect and federal agents began watching him while the case against him continued to develop.<br /><br />The Pennsylvania surveillance became especially important because investigators still needed evidence that could strengthen the DNA connection between Kohberger’s family and the male DNA recovered from the button snap of a knife sheath found beside Madison Mogen’s body. Agents watched the Kohberger family residence in the Poconos and eventually retrieved garbage that had been placed outside for collection, allowing investigators to obtain a DNA sample without approaching Kohberger directly. Testing of material from that trash produced a familial DNA result indicating that the biological father of the person whose DNA was on the sheath was overwhelmingly likely to be Kohberger’s father, providing investigators with a critical additional link before the arrest. Reports later described agents watching Kohberger’s movements during this period, including his nighttime behavior around the family’s garbage, while tactical teams prepared to take him into custody. The surveillance operation therefore represented the final stage of a much broader investigative chain: cameras helped identify the Elantra, vehicle and cellphone records helped track Kohberger across the country, physical surveillance kept investigators aware of his movements in Pennsylvania, and covert collection of the family’s trash helped turn the DNA from the knife sheath into evidence pointing directly toward him. Kohberger was arrested at his parents’ home on December 30, 2022, ending a seven-week investigation that had initially appeared to have no publicly identified suspect.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73825336</guid><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73825336/megakohbergersurveillancefbiassistance.mp3" length="34429013" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8c1d9048-3692-4a6b-9195-e464de2c93f7/8c1d9048-3692-4a6b-9195-e464de2c93f7.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8c1d9048-3692-4a6b-9195-e464de2c93f7/8c1d9048-3692-4a6b-9195-e464de2c93f7.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8c1d9048-3692-4a6b-9195-e464de2c93f7/8c1d9048-3692-4a6b-9195-e464de2c93f7.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The surveillance operation that helped authorities close in on Bryan Kohberger began after investigators connected a white Hyundai Elantra seen repeatedly on surveillance cameras near 1122 King Road to a similar vehicle registered to Kohberger, then a...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The surveillance operation that helped authorities close in on Bryan Kohberger began after investigators connected a white Hyundai Elantra seen repeatedly on surveillance cameras near 1122 King Road to a similar vehicle registered to Kohberger, then a criminology doctoral student at Washington State University. Police had collected video from residences, businesses and traffic cameras showing the white sedan moving through Moscow around the time Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin were murdered on November 13, 2022, and investigators later traced Kohberger’s Elantra back to Washington State University. Cellphone records added another layer, showing movements investigators believed were consistent with the vehicle’s route before and after the killings. When Kohberger and his father drove the Elantra from Washington to the family home in Pennsylvania in December, authorities were able to trace portions of that cross-country trip through license-plate readers, surveillance footage and other records. By the time Kohberger arrived in Pennsylvania on December 16, investigators had developed him into a major suspect and federal agents began watching him while the case against him continued to develop.<br /><br />The Pennsylvania surveillance became especially important because investigators still needed evidence that could strengthen the DNA connection between Kohberger’s family and the male DNA recovered from the button snap of a knife sheath found beside Madison Mogen’s body. Agents watched the Kohberger family residence in the Poconos and eventually retrieved garbage that had been placed outside for collection, allowing investigators to obtain a DNA sample without approaching Kohberger directly. Testing of material from that trash produced a familial DNA result indicating that the biological father of the person whose DNA was on the sheath was overwhelmingly likely to be Kohberger’s father, providing investigators with a critical additional link before the arrest. Reports later described agents watching Kohberger’s movements during this period, including his nighttime behavior around the family’s garbage, while tactical teams prepared to take him into custody. The surveillance operation therefore represented the final stage of a much broader investigative chain: cameras helped identify the Elantra, vehicle and cellphone records helped track Kohberger across the country, physical surveillance kept investigators aware of his movements in Pennsylvania, and covert collection of the family’s trash helped turn the DNA from the knife sheath into evidence pointing directly toward him. Kohberger was arrested at his parents’ home on December 30, 2022, ending a seven-week investigation that had initially appeared to have no publicly identified suspect.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2152</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Chief Fry And The Investigation In Moscow (8/11/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-chief-fry-and-the-investigation-in-moscow-8-11-26--73825335</link><description><![CDATA[James Fry was the chief of the Moscow Police Department when Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin were murdered at 1122 King Road on November 13, 2022, making him one of the central law-enforcement figures in the investigation that followed. Fry had worked for the Moscow Police Department since 1993 and became chief in 2016, years before his relatively small department was suddenly confronted with one of the most closely watched murder investigations in the country. Under Fry, Moscow police remained the lead agency while working with the Idaho State Police and FBI, eventually bringing together roughly 130 law-enforcement personnel as investigators processed the crime scene, collected thousands of tips, reviewed surveillance footage, traced a white Hyundai Elantra and developed the forensic evidence that ultimately pointed toward Bryan Kohberger. Fry also became the public face of the investigation, appearing repeatedly at press conferences and attempting to reassure a frightened community while protecting evidence investigators believed could not yet be released. He later acknowledged that the department should have communicated with the public sooner, particularly after waiting several days to hold its first major news conference.<br /><br /><br />Fry’s handling of the case drew both criticism and praise, especially during the seven weeks between the murders and Kohberger’s December 30, 2022 arrest in Pennsylvania. Families, reporters and members of the public repeatedly demanded more information, while speculation exploded online about potential suspects, stalkers, surviving roommates, the murder weapon and whether the killer remained in Moscow. Fry maintained that investigators were deliberately withholding certain details because releasing them could jeopardize the case, and after Kohberger’s arrest it became clearer how much investigative work had been occurring outside public view. Fry later estimated that during those seven weeks he had only four days off, while members of his department worked similarly demanding schedules. His importance to the Moscow murders therefore extended beyond being the police chief who appeared before the cameras: he supervised the local department responsible for the case, coordinated an enormous influx of state and federal resources, managed an unprecedented level of national attention and helped guide an investigation that moved from a seemingly suspect-less quadruple homicide to the identification and arrest of Bryan Kohberger. Fry remained Moscow’s police chief until May 2024, leaving the department after more than three decades of service.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73825335</guid><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73825335/megachieffrymoscowinvestigation.mp3" length="30379407" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/445e1a32-0d23-455e-81da-2da2950ed10a/445e1a32-0d23-455e-81da-2da2950ed10a.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/445e1a32-0d23-455e-81da-2da2950ed10a/445e1a32-0d23-455e-81da-2da2950ed10a.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/445e1a32-0d23-455e-81da-2da2950ed10a/445e1a32-0d23-455e-81da-2da2950ed10a.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>James Fry was the chief of the Moscow Police Department when Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin were murdered at 1122 King Road on November 13, 2022, making him one of the central law-enforcement figures in the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[James Fry was the chief of the Moscow Police Department when Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin were murdered at 1122 King Road on November 13, 2022, making him one of the central law-enforcement figures in the investigation that followed. Fry had worked for the Moscow Police Department since 1993 and became chief in 2016, years before his relatively small department was suddenly confronted with one of the most closely watched murder investigations in the country. Under Fry, Moscow police remained the lead agency while working with the Idaho State Police and FBI, eventually bringing together roughly 130 law-enforcement personnel as investigators processed the crime scene, collected thousands of tips, reviewed surveillance footage, traced a white Hyundai Elantra and developed the forensic evidence that ultimately pointed toward Bryan Kohberger. Fry also became the public face of the investigation, appearing repeatedly at press conferences and attempting to reassure a frightened community while protecting evidence investigators believed could not yet be released. He later acknowledged that the department should have communicated with the public sooner, particularly after waiting several days to hold its first major news conference.<br /><br /><br />Fry’s handling of the case drew both criticism and praise, especially during the seven weeks between the murders and Kohberger’s December 30, 2022 arrest in Pennsylvania. Families, reporters and members of the public repeatedly demanded more information, while speculation exploded online about potential suspects, stalkers, surviving roommates, the murder weapon and whether the killer remained in Moscow. Fry maintained that investigators were deliberately withholding certain details because releasing them could jeopardize the case, and after Kohberger’s arrest it became clearer how much investigative work had been occurring outside public view. Fry later estimated that during those seven weeks he had only four days off, while members of his department worked similarly demanding schedules. His importance to the Moscow murders therefore extended beyond being the police chief who appeared before the cameras: he supervised the local department responsible for the case, coordinated an enormous influx of state and federal resources, managed an unprecedented level of national attention and helped guide an investigation that moved from a seemingly suspect-less quadruple homicide to the identification and arrest of Bryan Kohberger. Fry remained Moscow’s police chief until May 2024, leaving the department after more than three decades of service.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1899</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Judge Hippler's Order On Bryan Kohberger's Capital Punishment Motion (Part 10)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/judge-hippler-s-order-on-bryan-kohberger-s-capital-punishment-motion-part-10--73395950</link><description><![CDATA[In State v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, Judge Steven Hippler issued a Memorandum Decision and Order addressing multiple defense motions aimed at removing the death penalty as a sentencing option. The defense presented 12 motions challenging various aspects of Idaho's capital punishment framework, including the constitutionality of execution methods and the applicability of certain aggravating factors. After thorough consideration, Judge Hippler denied all motions, affirming that the death penalty remains a viable sentencing option in this case.<br /><br />The court's 55-page decision systematically addressed each defense argument, referencing precedents set by the Idaho Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court that uphold the constitutionality of capital punishment. Judge Hippler concluded that the defense's claims did not warrant the removal of the death penalty, allowing the prosecution to continue seeking it as a potential sentence. This ruling signifies a pivotal moment in the proceedings, underscoring the court's commitment to adhering to established legal standards in capital cases. <br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/isc.coi/CR01-24-31665/2024/112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73395950</guid><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73395950/moscowmurderorder10.mp3" length="9938277" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/37c54215-5ac3-440b-8c04-caf0171d8ae0/37c54215-5ac3-440b-8c04-caf0171d8ae0.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/37c54215-5ac3-440b-8c04-caf0171d8ae0/37c54215-5ac3-440b-8c04-caf0171d8ae0.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/37c54215-5ac3-440b-8c04-caf0171d8ae0/37c54215-5ac3-440b-8c04-caf0171d8ae0.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In State v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, Judge Steven Hippler issued a Memorandum Decision and Order addressing multiple defense motions aimed at removing the death penalty as a sentencing option. The defense presented 12 motions...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In State v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, Judge Steven Hippler issued a Memorandum Decision and Order addressing multiple defense motions aimed at removing the death penalty as a sentencing option. The defense presented 12 motions challenging various aspects of Idaho's capital punishment framework, including the constitutionality of execution methods and the applicability of certain aggravating factors. After thorough consideration, Judge Hippler denied all motions, affirming that the death penalty remains a viable sentencing option in this case.<br /><br />The court's 55-page decision systematically addressed each defense argument, referencing precedents set by the Idaho Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court that uphold the constitutionality of capital punishment. Judge Hippler concluded that the defense's claims did not warrant the removal of the death penalty, allowing the prosecution to continue seeking it as a potential sentence. This ruling signifies a pivotal moment in the proceedings, underscoring the court's commitment to adhering to established legal standards in capital cases. <br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/isc.coi/CR01-24-31665/2024/112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>622</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Judge Hippler's Order On Bryan Kohberger's Capital Punishment Motion (Part 9)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/judge-hippler-s-order-on-bryan-kohberger-s-capital-punishment-motion-part-9--73395949</link><description><![CDATA[In State v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, Judge Steven Hippler issued a Memorandum Decision and Order addressing multiple defense motions aimed at removing the death penalty as a sentencing option. The defense presented 12 motions challenging various aspects of Idaho's capital punishment framework, including the constitutionality of execution methods and the applicability of certain aggravating factors. After thorough consideration, Judge Hippler denied all motions, affirming that the death penalty remains a viable sentencing option in this case.<br /><br />The court's 55-page decision systematically addressed each defense argument, referencing precedents set by the Idaho Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court that uphold the constitutionality of capital punishment. Judge Hippler concluded that the defense's claims did not warrant the removal of the death penalty, allowing the prosecution to continue seeking it as a potential sentence. This ruling signifies a pivotal moment in the proceedings, underscoring the court's commitment to adhering to established legal standards in capital cases. <br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/isc.coi/CR01-24-31665/2024/112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73395949</guid><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73395949/moscowdeathorder9.mp3" length="12489918" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7be55313-d8e6-4e0d-beaf-2a0b3e4096bb/7be55313-d8e6-4e0d-beaf-2a0b3e4096bb.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7be55313-d8e6-4e0d-beaf-2a0b3e4096bb/7be55313-d8e6-4e0d-beaf-2a0b3e4096bb.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7be55313-d8e6-4e0d-beaf-2a0b3e4096bb/7be55313-d8e6-4e0d-beaf-2a0b3e4096bb.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In State v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, Judge Steven Hippler issued a Memorandum Decision and Order addressing multiple defense motions aimed at removing the death penalty as a sentencing option. The defense presented 12 motions...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In State v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, Judge Steven Hippler issued a Memorandum Decision and Order addressing multiple defense motions aimed at removing the death penalty as a sentencing option. The defense presented 12 motions challenging various aspects of Idaho's capital punishment framework, including the constitutionality of execution methods and the applicability of certain aggravating factors. After thorough consideration, Judge Hippler denied all motions, affirming that the death penalty remains a viable sentencing option in this case.<br /><br />The court's 55-page decision systematically addressed each defense argument, referencing precedents set by the Idaho Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court that uphold the constitutionality of capital punishment. Judge Hippler concluded that the defense's claims did not warrant the removal of the death penalty, allowing the prosecution to continue seeking it as a potential sentence. This ruling signifies a pivotal moment in the proceedings, underscoring the court's commitment to adhering to established legal standards in capital cases. <br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/isc.coi/CR01-24-31665/2024/112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>781</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Tyler Robinson Preliminary Hearing Transcripts (Day 1-Part 4) (8/11/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcripts-day-1-part-4-8-11-26--73823829</link><description><![CDATA[Day one of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing on July 6, 2026, largely centered on prosecutors beginning to construct a timeline of Charlie Kirk’s killing at Utah Valley University and establishing the authenticity of the surveillance footage and investigative records they intended to use against Robinson. Former UVU police officer Chris Bagley described the moment the gunshot rang out during Kirk’s September 10, 2025 event and the chaos that followed, while Utah State Bureau of Investigation agent David Hull walked the court through the enormous video-review effort undertaken after the shooting. Hull testified that investigators examined hundreds of hours of surveillance footage and ultimately tracked a person they believed was Robinson moving around the UVU campus at several different points that day. Prosecutors introduced surveillance recordings from multiple locations as they attempted to connect the person seen approaching the campus, moving toward the area surrounding the Losee Center, and later leaving the area to Robinson. Three separate videos depicting Kirk being shot were admitted, although Judge Tony Graf determined that their graphic nature warranted restricting their display to the attorneys’ and judge’s monitors rather than broadcasting them throughout the courtroom. Kirk’s widow, Erika, and his parents left the courtroom while the videos were reviewed. Prosecutors also introduced Kirk’s autopsy report through Hull, which listed his cause of death as a gunshot wound to the neck and the manner of death as homicide<br /><br />The defense spent much of the first day attacking the manner in which the prosecution was getting its evidence into the record rather than attempting to disprove the entire prosecution theory at that stage. Kathryn Nester and Robinson’s attorneys repeatedly raised hearsay, foundation and authentication objections, arguing that investigators were being permitted to introduce reports, statements and records created by other people without those individuals appearing personally to testify. Judge Graf overruled most of those objections, reflecting the substantially lower evidentiary threshold governing a Utah preliminary hearing, whose purpose was only to determine whether probable cause existed to send Robinson to trial rather than whether prosecutors could prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. One significant exception involved an edited compilation of surveillance footage, which Graf declined to admit in that form and required prosecutors to replace with the underlying unedited material. Hull’s testimony also revealed the scope of the prosecution’s surveillance theory: investigators claimed Robinson had appeared on or around the UVU campus multiple times on September 10 and that they were attempting to stitch those appearances together into a continuous identification of the alleged shooter. By the end of day one, prosecutors had established the killing itself, the medical cause of Kirk’s death, the existence and authenticity of substantial video evidence and the beginnings of their effort to identify Robinson as the person captured in that footage. They had not yet presented many of the pieces expected to become more consequential later in the hearing, including the rifle and DNA evidence, Robinson’s alleged communications and admissions, and testimony concerning his roommate Lance Twiggs.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73823829</guid><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73823829/robinsonprelimday1part4.mp3" length="11542822" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/be7b1bff-d0c5-4e33-9def-76e62e5dc1b6/be7b1bff-d0c5-4e33-9def-76e62e5dc1b6.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/be7b1bff-d0c5-4e33-9def-76e62e5dc1b6/be7b1bff-d0c5-4e33-9def-76e62e5dc1b6.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/be7b1bff-d0c5-4e33-9def-76e62e5dc1b6/be7b1bff-d0c5-4e33-9def-76e62e5dc1b6.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Day one of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing on July 6, 2026, largely centered on prosecutors beginning to construct a timeline of Charlie Kirk’s killing at Utah Valley University and establishing the authenticity of the surveillance footage and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Day one of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing on July 6, 2026, largely centered on prosecutors beginning to construct a timeline of Charlie Kirk’s killing at Utah Valley University and establishing the authenticity of the surveillance footage and investigative records they intended to use against Robinson. Former UVU police officer Chris Bagley described the moment the gunshot rang out during Kirk’s September 10, 2025 event and the chaos that followed, while Utah State Bureau of Investigation agent David Hull walked the court through the enormous video-review effort undertaken after the shooting. Hull testified that investigators examined hundreds of hours of surveillance footage and ultimately tracked a person they believed was Robinson moving around the UVU campus at several different points that day. Prosecutors introduced surveillance recordings from multiple locations as they attempted to connect the person seen approaching the campus, moving toward the area surrounding the Losee Center, and later leaving the area to Robinson. Three separate videos depicting Kirk being shot were admitted, although Judge Tony Graf determined that their graphic nature warranted restricting their display to the attorneys’ and judge’s monitors rather than broadcasting them throughout the courtroom. Kirk’s widow, Erika, and his parents left the courtroom while the videos were reviewed. Prosecutors also introduced Kirk’s autopsy report through Hull, which listed his cause of death as a gunshot wound to the neck and the manner of death as homicide<br /><br />The defense spent much of the first day attacking the manner in which the prosecution was getting its evidence into the record rather than attempting to disprove the entire prosecution theory at that stage. Kathryn Nester and Robinson’s attorneys repeatedly raised hearsay, foundation and authentication objections, arguing that investigators were being permitted to introduce reports, statements and records created by other people without those individuals appearing personally to testify. Judge Graf overruled most of those objections, reflecting the substantially lower evidentiary threshold governing a Utah preliminary hearing, whose purpose was only to determine whether probable cause existed to send Robinson to trial rather than whether prosecutors could prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. One significant exception involved an edited compilation of surveillance footage, which Graf declined to admit in that form and required prosecutors to replace with the underlying unedited material. Hull’s testimony also revealed the scope of the prosecution’s surveillance theory: investigators claimed Robinson had appeared on or around the UVU campus multiple times on September 10 and that they were attempting to stitch those appearances together into a continuous identification of the alleged shooter. By the end of day one, prosecutors had established the killing itself, the medical cause of Kirk’s death, the existence and authenticity of substantial video evidence and the beginnings of their effort to identify Robinson as the person captured in that footage. They had not yet presented many of the pieces expected to become more consequential later in the hearing, including the rifle and DNA evidence, Robinson’s alleged communications and admissions, and testimony concerning his roommate Lance Twiggs.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>722</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvu</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Jeffrey Epstein and the Investigation That Never Expanded (Part 2) (8/11/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/jeffrey-epstein-and-the-investigation-that-never-expanded-part-2-8-11-26--73782390</link><description><![CDATA[From the earliest federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein, the scope appeared strikingly narrow compared with the breadth of the conduct surrounding him. Investigators had evidence pointing beyond Epstein himself: recruiters who helped bring young women and girls into his orbit, employees who facilitated access to his properties, financial institutions that processed enormous sums of money, pilots who transported Epstein and his associates, and a network of powerful people who repeatedly appeared around him. Yet the federal response repeatedly centered on Epstein as an individual offender rather than treating the operation surrounding him as a potentially sprawling criminal enterprise. The extraordinarily broad non-prosecution agreement reached in Florida reinforced that approach by extending protection to unnamed potential co-conspirators instead of using those individuals as investigative pressure points. When Epstein was arrested again in 2019, prosecutors charged him with sex trafficking conspiracy and sex trafficking, but his death brought the criminal case against him to an abrupt end. Ghislaine Maxwell was later prosecuted and convicted, but the broader question remained: why had a network that operated across multiple jurisdictions for years produced so few federal prosecutions? Taken together, the history created the appearance of an investigation designed to establish responsibility for specific defendants rather than systematically identify every facilitator, recruiter, financial enabler, participant, and potential co-conspirator connected to Epstein's operation.<br /><br />The DOJ also had an extensive collection of investigative and prosecutorial tools available that could have supported a much broader inquiry. Federal authorities could pursue conspiracy charges, money-laundering statutes, financial-record subpoenas, grand-jury testimony, immunity agreements, cooperation deals, immigration and visa investigations, tax inquiries, asset-forfeiture proceedings, obstruction cases, and, where the evidence satisfied the statutory requirements, potentially racketeering theories aimed at an ongoing enterprise rather than isolated crimes. Following Epstein's money alone could have provided investigators with a roadmap through banks, corporations, trusts, shell entities, property transactions, payments to associates, and transfers involving victims or recruiters. Aggressively flipping lower-level participants could likewise have helped prosecutors work upward through the organization instead of stopping with its most recognizable figures. None of that automatically would have produced charges against every person associated with Epstein, because association itself was not evidence of criminal conduct, but the striking issue was how rarely the government's enormous investigative arsenal appeared to be deployed publicly toward dismantling the entire ecosystem that allowed Epstein's abuse to continue. The enduring criticism, therefore, was not simply that prosecutors failed to charge more people; it was that the government never demonstrated the kind of relentless, enterprise-wide investigation routinely employed against organized crime, trafficking organizations, fraud rings, and other complex criminal networks.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73782390</guid><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73782390/epsteininvestigationfailure2.mp3" length="12298493" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/43e9f4ca-f204-469f-9655-42b7c038f8c3/43e9f4ca-f204-469f-9655-42b7c038f8c3.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/43e9f4ca-f204-469f-9655-42b7c038f8c3/43e9f4ca-f204-469f-9655-42b7c038f8c3.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/43e9f4ca-f204-469f-9655-42b7c038f8c3/43e9f4ca-f204-469f-9655-42b7c038f8c3.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>From the earliest federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein, the scope appeared strikingly narrow compared with the breadth of the conduct surrounding him. Investigators had evidence pointing beyond Epstein himself: recruiters who helped bring young...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[From the earliest federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein, the scope appeared strikingly narrow compared with the breadth of the conduct surrounding him. Investigators had evidence pointing beyond Epstein himself: recruiters who helped bring young women and girls into his orbit, employees who facilitated access to his properties, financial institutions that processed enormous sums of money, pilots who transported Epstein and his associates, and a network of powerful people who repeatedly appeared around him. Yet the federal response repeatedly centered on Epstein as an individual offender rather than treating the operation surrounding him as a potentially sprawling criminal enterprise. The extraordinarily broad non-prosecution agreement reached in Florida reinforced that approach by extending protection to unnamed potential co-conspirators instead of using those individuals as investigative pressure points. When Epstein was arrested again in 2019, prosecutors charged him with sex trafficking conspiracy and sex trafficking, but his death brought the criminal case against him to an abrupt end. Ghislaine Maxwell was later prosecuted and convicted, but the broader question remained: why had a network that operated across multiple jurisdictions for years produced so few federal prosecutions? Taken together, the history created the appearance of an investigation designed to establish responsibility for specific defendants rather than systematically identify every facilitator, recruiter, financial enabler, participant, and potential co-conspirator connected to Epstein's operation.<br /><br />The DOJ also had an extensive collection of investigative and prosecutorial tools available that could have supported a much broader inquiry. Federal authorities could pursue conspiracy charges, money-laundering statutes, financial-record subpoenas, grand-jury testimony, immunity agreements, cooperation deals, immigration and visa investigations, tax inquiries, asset-forfeiture proceedings, obstruction cases, and, where the evidence satisfied the statutory requirements, potentially racketeering theories aimed at an ongoing enterprise rather than isolated crimes. Following Epstein's money alone could have provided investigators with a roadmap through banks, corporations, trusts, shell entities, property transactions, payments to associates, and transfers involving victims or recruiters. Aggressively flipping lower-level participants could likewise have helped prosecutors work upward through the organization instead of stopping with its most recognizable figures. None of that automatically would have produced charges against every person associated with Epstein, because association itself was not evidence of criminal conduct, but the striking issue was how rarely the government's enormous investigative arsenal appeared to be deployed publicly toward dismantling the entire ecosystem that allowed Epstein's abuse to continue. The enduring criticism, therefore, was not simply that prosecutors failed to charge more people; it was that the government never demonstrated the kind of relentless, enterprise-wide investigation routinely employed against organized crime, trafficking organizations, fraud rings, and other complex criminal networks.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>769</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Jeffrey Epstein and the Investigation That Never Expanded (Part 1) (8/11/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/jeffrey-epstein-and-the-investigation-that-never-expanded-part-1-8-11-26--73782389</link><description><![CDATA[From the earliest federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein, the scope appeared strikingly narrow compared with the breadth of the conduct surrounding him. Investigators had evidence pointing beyond Epstein himself: recruiters who helped bring young women and girls into his orbit, employees who facilitated access to his properties, financial institutions that processed enormous sums of money, pilots who transported Epstein and his associates, and a network of powerful people who repeatedly appeared around him. Yet the federal response repeatedly centered on Epstein as an individual offender rather than treating the operation surrounding him as a potentially sprawling criminal enterprise. The extraordinarily broad non-prosecution agreement reached in Florida reinforced that approach by extending protection to unnamed potential co-conspirators instead of using those individuals as investigative pressure points. When Epstein was arrested again in 2019, prosecutors charged him with sex trafficking conspiracy and sex trafficking, but his death brought the criminal case against him to an abrupt end. Ghislaine Maxwell was later prosecuted and convicted, but the broader question remained: why had a network that operated across multiple jurisdictions for years produced so few federal prosecutions? Taken together, the history created the appearance of an investigation designed to establish responsibility for specific defendants rather than systematically identify every facilitator, recruiter, financial enabler, participant, and potential co-conspirator connected to Epstein's operation.<br /><br />The DOJ also had an extensive collection of investigative and prosecutorial tools available that could have supported a much broader inquiry. Federal authorities could pursue conspiracy charges, money-laundering statutes, financial-record subpoenas, grand-jury testimony, immunity agreements, cooperation deals, immigration and visa investigations, tax inquiries, asset-forfeiture proceedings, obstruction cases, and, where the evidence satisfied the statutory requirements, potentially racketeering theories aimed at an ongoing enterprise rather than isolated crimes. Following Epstein's money alone could have provided investigators with a roadmap through banks, corporations, trusts, shell entities, property transactions, payments to associates, and transfers involving victims or recruiters. Aggressively flipping lower-level participants could likewise have helped prosecutors work upward through the organization instead of stopping with its most recognizable figures. None of that automatically would have produced charges against every person associated with Epstein, because association itself was not evidence of criminal conduct, but the striking issue was how rarely the government's enormous investigative arsenal appeared to be deployed publicly toward dismantling the entire ecosystem that allowed Epstein's abuse to continue. The enduring criticism, therefore, was not simply that prosecutors failed to charge more people; it was that the government never demonstrated the kind of relentless, enterprise-wide investigation routinely employed against organized crime, trafficking organizations, fraud rings, and other complex criminal networks.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73782389</guid><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73782389/epsteininvestigationfailure1.mp3" length="12414267" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/88a928cb-3442-454e-a331-4a439b96dafc/88a928cb-3442-454e-a331-4a439b96dafc.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/88a928cb-3442-454e-a331-4a439b96dafc/88a928cb-3442-454e-a331-4a439b96dafc.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/88a928cb-3442-454e-a331-4a439b96dafc/88a928cb-3442-454e-a331-4a439b96dafc.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>From the earliest federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein, the scope appeared strikingly narrow compared with the breadth of the conduct surrounding him. Investigators had evidence pointing beyond Epstein himself: recruiters who helped bring young...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[From the earliest federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein, the scope appeared strikingly narrow compared with the breadth of the conduct surrounding him. Investigators had evidence pointing beyond Epstein himself: recruiters who helped bring young women and girls into his orbit, employees who facilitated access to his properties, financial institutions that processed enormous sums of money, pilots who transported Epstein and his associates, and a network of powerful people who repeatedly appeared around him. Yet the federal response repeatedly centered on Epstein as an individual offender rather than treating the operation surrounding him as a potentially sprawling criminal enterprise. The extraordinarily broad non-prosecution agreement reached in Florida reinforced that approach by extending protection to unnamed potential co-conspirators instead of using those individuals as investigative pressure points. When Epstein was arrested again in 2019, prosecutors charged him with sex trafficking conspiracy and sex trafficking, but his death brought the criminal case against him to an abrupt end. Ghislaine Maxwell was later prosecuted and convicted, but the broader question remained: why had a network that operated across multiple jurisdictions for years produced so few federal prosecutions? Taken together, the history created the appearance of an investigation designed to establish responsibility for specific defendants rather than systematically identify every facilitator, recruiter, financial enabler, participant, and potential co-conspirator connected to Epstein's operation.<br /><br />The DOJ also had an extensive collection of investigative and prosecutorial tools available that could have supported a much broader inquiry. Federal authorities could pursue conspiracy charges, money-laundering statutes, financial-record subpoenas, grand-jury testimony, immunity agreements, cooperation deals, immigration and visa investigations, tax inquiries, asset-forfeiture proceedings, obstruction cases, and, where the evidence satisfied the statutory requirements, potentially racketeering theories aimed at an ongoing enterprise rather than isolated crimes. Following Epstein's money alone could have provided investigators with a roadmap through banks, corporations, trusts, shell entities, property transactions, payments to associates, and transfers involving victims or recruiters. Aggressively flipping lower-level participants could likewise have helped prosecutors work upward through the organization instead of stopping with its most recognizable figures. None of that automatically would have produced charges against every person associated with Epstein, because association itself was not evidence of criminal conduct, but the striking issue was how rarely the government's enormous investigative arsenal appeared to be deployed publicly toward dismantling the entire ecosystem that allowed Epstein's abuse to continue. The enduring criticism, therefore, was not simply that prosecutors failed to charge more people; it was that the government never demonstrated the kind of relentless, enterprise-wide investigation routinely employed against organized crime, trafficking organizations, fraud rings, and other complex criminal networks.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>776</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Epstein’s Death Didn’t End the Story. It Blew It Open (8/11/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/epstein-s-death-didn-t-end-the-story-it-blew-it-open-8-11-26--73782393</link><description><![CDATA[Seven years after Jeffrey Epstein was found dead in his Manhattan jail cell, the circumstances surrounding his death continued to fuel deep public distrust in the institutions responsible for holding him accountable. Epstein had been arrested only weeks earlier on federal sex-trafficking charges that could have finally forced a full public accounting of his criminal operation, his wealth, his associates, and the people and institutions that enabled him. Instead, he died in federal custody under conditions marked by extraordinary failures, including missed inmate checks, falsified records, severe staffing problems, exhausted guards, and serious issues with surveillance systems. Although his death was officially ruled a suicide and subsequent investigations supported that conclusion, the documented failures surrounding his detention created a credibility crisis that never went away. The phrase “Epstein didn’t kill himself” eventually became more than a theory about his death and evolved into shorthand for a much broader belief that powerful institutions protect influential people, conceal uncomfortable truths, and expect the public to accept explanations that often seem incomplete.<br /><br />Epstein’s death also ensured that the full scope of his operation would never be tested in a public criminal trial, leaving survivors, journalists, lawmakers, courts, and the public to reconstruct the story through civil litigation, congressional investigations, document releases, and years of piecemeal disclosures. Rather than fading with time, the Epstein scandal expanded into a larger debate over elite accountability, institutional protection, and the failure of law enforcement to fully investigate everyone who may have enabled or participated in his criminal enterprise. Questions have continued to surround who helped Epstein, what authorities knew, why opportunities to pursue additional suspects were missed, and whether the government ever seriously attempted to investigate the complete scope of his network. Seven years after his death, the enduring legacy of the Epstein case has become one of institutional distrust, with every new disclosure reinforcing the belief that the public has still not been given a complete accounting of what happened, who was involved, and why so many people escaped meaningful scrutiny.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2026/08/10/jeffrey-epstein-death-legacy-column-01030323" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jeffrey Epstein’s Death Was Supposed to Bury the Truth. It Did the Opposite. - POLITICO</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73782393</guid><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 18:30:05 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73782393/epsteinlegacy7yearsafterdeathpolitico.mp3" length="19694698" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f5d66ffb-341a-468d-a42b-2b0bb5b8d7e1/f5d66ffb-341a-468d-a42b-2b0bb5b8d7e1.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f5d66ffb-341a-468d-a42b-2b0bb5b8d7e1/f5d66ffb-341a-468d-a42b-2b0bb5b8d7e1.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f5d66ffb-341a-468d-a42b-2b0bb5b8d7e1/f5d66ffb-341a-468d-a42b-2b0bb5b8d7e1.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Seven years after Jeffrey Epstein was found dead in his Manhattan jail cell, the circumstances surrounding his death continued to fuel deep public distrust in the institutions responsible for holding him accountable. Epstein had been arrested only...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Seven years after Jeffrey Epstein was found dead in his Manhattan jail cell, the circumstances surrounding his death continued to fuel deep public distrust in the institutions responsible for holding him accountable. Epstein had been arrested only weeks earlier on federal sex-trafficking charges that could have finally forced a full public accounting of his criminal operation, his wealth, his associates, and the people and institutions that enabled him. Instead, he died in federal custody under conditions marked by extraordinary failures, including missed inmate checks, falsified records, severe staffing problems, exhausted guards, and serious issues with surveillance systems. Although his death was officially ruled a suicide and subsequent investigations supported that conclusion, the documented failures surrounding his detention created a credibility crisis that never went away. The phrase “Epstein didn’t kill himself” eventually became more than a theory about his death and evolved into shorthand for a much broader belief that powerful institutions protect influential people, conceal uncomfortable truths, and expect the public to accept explanations that often seem incomplete.<br /><br />Epstein’s death also ensured that the full scope of his operation would never be tested in a public criminal trial, leaving survivors, journalists, lawmakers, courts, and the public to reconstruct the story through civil litigation, congressional investigations, document releases, and years of piecemeal disclosures. Rather than fading with time, the Epstein scandal expanded into a larger debate over elite accountability, institutional protection, and the failure of law enforcement to fully investigate everyone who may have enabled or participated in his criminal enterprise. Questions have continued to surround who helped Epstein, what authorities knew, why opportunities to pursue additional suspects were missed, and whether the government ever seriously attempted to investigate the complete scope of his network. Seven years after his death, the enduring legacy of the Epstein case has become one of institutional distrust, with every new disclosure reinforcing the belief that the public has still not been given a complete accounting of what happened, who was involved, and why so many people escaped meaningful scrutiny.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2026/08/10/jeffrey-epstein-death-legacy-column-01030323" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jeffrey Epstein’s Death Was Supposed to Bury the Truth. It Did the Opposite. - POLITICO</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1231</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Murder In Moscow:  The Autopsy Findings in the Murders of Madison, Kaylee, Xana and Ethan (Part 1) (8/11/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-the-autopsy-findings-in-the-murders-of-madison-kaylee-xana-and-ethan-part-1-8-11-26--73823792</link><description><![CDATA[The autopsy reports for University of Idaho students Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin documented the extraordinary violence of the November 13, 2022 murders inside the King Road residence in Moscow. Spokane County Chief Medical Examiner Dr. Veena Singh determined that all four died from multiple sharp-force injuries consistent with a large fixed-blade knife, including a weapon such as the Ka-Bar prosecutors said was used in the killings. Mogen suffered 28 stab wounds, including extensive injuries to her face, neck and upper body that damaged major blood vessels, a lung and her liver. Chapin suffered fewer wounds than the three women, but his injuries included devastating wounds to the neck and major blood vessels, including one wound reportedly measuring approximately seven inches deep. Singh concluded that all four victims experienced a high degree of pain or suffering before death, although Chapin's suffering was assessed as occurring to a lesser degree than that of the other victims.<br /><br />The reports provided particularly disturbing new details about Kernodle and Goncalves. Kernodle suffered numerous wounds across her head, neck, chest, abdomen, back and extremities, including injuries to her heart, lung and major blood vessels, and her autopsy was the only one that specifically identified injuries consistent with defensive wounds, supporting the conclusion that she attempted to fight off her attacker. Goncalves suffered a combination of sharp-force and blunt-force trauma that the medical examiner described as more severe in certain respects than the injuries suffered by the others; her injuries included bleeding around the brain, a fractured nose, significant facial trauma and a knocked-out tooth, as well as evidence suggesting that an object had been pressed across her mouth. Taken together, the newly disclosed autopsy findings provided a much clearer medical picture of what occurred inside the house and demonstrated that this was not simply a series of quick fatal stab wounds, but an exceptionally violent attack in which the four victims suffered extensive and, in some cases, markedly different injuries before their deaths.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hFN8NIvmLwTktmiOCrSwFdHPOrW2x_V-/view?pli=1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">012725+Exhibits+S-1+and+S-1+a-e+to+States+Supp+Resp+to+Rqst+for+Disc+RE+Penalty+Phase+Experts.pdf - Google Drive</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73823792</guid><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73823792/moscowautopsyreport1.mp3" length="16234414" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4339ecd8-950d-4fdd-8a13-87dc34b2b8e6/4339ecd8-950d-4fdd-8a13-87dc34b2b8e6.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4339ecd8-950d-4fdd-8a13-87dc34b2b8e6/4339ecd8-950d-4fdd-8a13-87dc34b2b8e6.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4339ecd8-950d-4fdd-8a13-87dc34b2b8e6/4339ecd8-950d-4fdd-8a13-87dc34b2b8e6.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The autopsy reports for University of Idaho students Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin documented the extraordinary violence of the November 13, 2022 murders inside the King Road residence in Moscow. Spokane County Chief...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The autopsy reports for University of Idaho students Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin documented the extraordinary violence of the November 13, 2022 murders inside the King Road residence in Moscow. Spokane County Chief Medical Examiner Dr. Veena Singh determined that all four died from multiple sharp-force injuries consistent with a large fixed-blade knife, including a weapon such as the Ka-Bar prosecutors said was used in the killings. Mogen suffered 28 stab wounds, including extensive injuries to her face, neck and upper body that damaged major blood vessels, a lung and her liver. Chapin suffered fewer wounds than the three women, but his injuries included devastating wounds to the neck and major blood vessels, including one wound reportedly measuring approximately seven inches deep. Singh concluded that all four victims experienced a high degree of pain or suffering before death, although Chapin's suffering was assessed as occurring to a lesser degree than that of the other victims.<br /><br />The reports provided particularly disturbing new details about Kernodle and Goncalves. Kernodle suffered numerous wounds across her head, neck, chest, abdomen, back and extremities, including injuries to her heart, lung and major blood vessels, and her autopsy was the only one that specifically identified injuries consistent with defensive wounds, supporting the conclusion that she attempted to fight off her attacker. Goncalves suffered a combination of sharp-force and blunt-force trauma that the medical examiner described as more severe in certain respects than the injuries suffered by the others; her injuries included bleeding around the brain, a fractured nose, significant facial trauma and a knocked-out tooth, as well as evidence suggesting that an object had been pressed across her mouth. Taken together, the newly disclosed autopsy findings provided a much clearer medical picture of what occurred inside the house and demonstrated that this was not simply a series of quick fatal stab wounds, but an exceptionally violent attack in which the four victims suffered extensive and, in some cases, markedly different injuries before their deaths.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hFN8NIvmLwTktmiOCrSwFdHPOrW2x_V-/view?pli=1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">012725+Exhibits+S-1+and+S-1+a-e+to+States+Supp+Resp+to+Rqst+for+Disc+RE+Penalty+Phase+Experts.pdf - Google Drive</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1015</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The New Mexico Epstein Commission Interim Report (Part 7) (8/11/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-new-mexico-epstein-commission-interim-report-part-7-8-11-26--73786001</link><description><![CDATA[The New Mexico Survivors’ Truth Commission’s 119-page interim report described Zorro Ranch as a major and largely neglected component of Jeffrey Epstein’s broader operation, concluding that authorities failed for years to seriously investigate what happened there. According to the Commission, Epstein maintained an elaborate, highly controlled compound in New Mexico where survivors reported sexual abuse and where young women were routinely transported, housed and brought into Epstein’s orbit. The report pointed to witness testimony, flight records, seized electronic evidence and FBI material suggesting that Zorro Ranch was integrated into the same system of recruitment, secrecy and exploitation seen at Epstein’s other properties. Among the evidence discussed were computer folders labeled “ZORRO,” discs referencing nude photographs associated with the ranch, accounts of young women arriving by aircraft, efforts to impose restrictive nondisclosure agreements on workers, and survivor statements describing abuse in New Mexico. The Commission stressed that the evidence remained under review and that allegations involving individuals named in the report were not final findings of wrongdoing, but it said the existing record was already sufficient to show that Epstein’s activities in New Mexico deserved far more scrutiny than they ever received.<br /><br />The report was especially critical of institutional failures, saying New Mexico and federal authorities effectively passed responsibility to prosecutors elsewhere while Epstein’s conduct in the state went largely unexamined. It said the U.S. Attorney’s Office for New Mexico and state officials expected the Southern District of New York to handle Epstein, but New York prosecutors concentrated on crimes tied to New York and Florida rather than building a New Mexico case. Zorro Ranch was never searched while Epstein was alive and, according to the report, was not subjected to a comprehensive law-enforcement search until March 2026, nearly seven years after his death. The Commission concluded that this passivity allowed evidence to disappear, memories to fade and potential criminal cases to become more difficult or impossible to prosecute. It also opened separate lines of inquiry into Epstein’s financial dealings, his relationships with scientific institutions and wealthy associates, and the conduct of banks, including subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan. Its clearest interim observation was devastating: Epstein continued exercising wealth and influence after becoming a registered sex offender, operated much of his system in plain sight, and New Mexico law enforcement’s decision to rely on other jurisdictions left the conduct of Epstein and his co-conspirators in the state “unexamined and unpunished.” Final findings and recommendations were deferred while the Commission continued issuing subpoenas, interviewing witnesses and searching for additional survivors and potential perpetrators.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.nmlegis.gov/handouts/HISC%20080526%20Item%201%20Interim%20Report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">NM Survivors' Truth Commission — Interim Report</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73786001</guid><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73786001/nmreport7.mp3" length="13467106" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e72b12aa-ef9f-49a4-a603-11fb2ae22d3e/e72b12aa-ef9f-49a4-a603-11fb2ae22d3e.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e72b12aa-ef9f-49a4-a603-11fb2ae22d3e/e72b12aa-ef9f-49a4-a603-11fb2ae22d3e.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e72b12aa-ef9f-49a4-a603-11fb2ae22d3e/e72b12aa-ef9f-49a4-a603-11fb2ae22d3e.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The New Mexico Survivors’ Truth Commission’s 119-page interim report described Zorro Ranch as a major and largely neglected component of Jeffrey Epstein’s broader operation, concluding that authorities failed for years to seriously investigate what...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The New Mexico Survivors’ Truth Commission’s 119-page interim report described Zorro Ranch as a major and largely neglected component of Jeffrey Epstein’s broader operation, concluding that authorities failed for years to seriously investigate what happened there. According to the Commission, Epstein maintained an elaborate, highly controlled compound in New Mexico where survivors reported sexual abuse and where young women were routinely transported, housed and brought into Epstein’s orbit. The report pointed to witness testimony, flight records, seized electronic evidence and FBI material suggesting that Zorro Ranch was integrated into the same system of recruitment, secrecy and exploitation seen at Epstein’s other properties. Among the evidence discussed were computer folders labeled “ZORRO,” discs referencing nude photographs associated with the ranch, accounts of young women arriving by aircraft, efforts to impose restrictive nondisclosure agreements on workers, and survivor statements describing abuse in New Mexico. The Commission stressed that the evidence remained under review and that allegations involving individuals named in the report were not final findings of wrongdoing, but it said the existing record was already sufficient to show that Epstein’s activities in New Mexico deserved far more scrutiny than they ever received.<br /><br />The report was especially critical of institutional failures, saying New Mexico and federal authorities effectively passed responsibility to prosecutors elsewhere while Epstein’s conduct in the state went largely unexamined. It said the U.S. Attorney’s Office for New Mexico and state officials expected the Southern District of New York to handle Epstein, but New York prosecutors concentrated on crimes tied to New York and Florida rather than building a New Mexico case. Zorro Ranch was never searched while Epstein was alive and, according to the report, was not subjected to a comprehensive law-enforcement search until March 2026, nearly seven years after his death. The Commission concluded that this passivity allowed evidence to disappear, memories to fade and potential criminal cases to become more difficult or impossible to prosecute. It also opened separate lines of inquiry into Epstein’s financial dealings, his relationships with scientific institutions and wealthy associates, and the conduct of banks, including subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan. Its clearest interim observation was devastating: Epstein continued exercising wealth and influence after becoming a registered sex offender, operated much of his system in plain sight, and New Mexico law enforcement’s decision to rely on other jurisdictions left the conduct of Epstein and his co-conspirators in the state “unexamined and unpunished.” Final findings and recommendations were deferred while the Commission continued issuing subpoenas, interviewing witnesses and searching for additional survivors and potential perpetrators.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.nmlegis.gov/handouts/HISC%20080526%20Item%201%20Interim%20Report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">NM Survivors' Truth Commission — Interim Report</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>842</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The New Mexico Epstein Commission Interim Report (Part 6) (8/10/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-new-mexico-epstein-commission-interim-report-part-6-8-10-26--73760587</link><description><![CDATA[The New Mexico Survivors’ Truth Commission’s 119-page interim report described Zorro Ranch as a major and largely neglected component of Jeffrey Epstein’s broader operation, concluding that authorities failed for years to seriously investigate what happened there. According to the Commission, Epstein maintained an elaborate, highly controlled compound in New Mexico where survivors reported sexual abuse and where young women were routinely transported, housed and brought into Epstein’s orbit. The report pointed to witness testimony, flight records, seized electronic evidence and FBI material suggesting that Zorro Ranch was integrated into the same system of recruitment, secrecy and exploitation seen at Epstein’s other properties. Among the evidence discussed were computer folders labeled “ZORRO,” discs referencing nude photographs associated with the ranch, accounts of young women arriving by aircraft, efforts to impose restrictive nondisclosure agreements on workers, and survivor statements describing abuse in New Mexico. The Commission stressed that the evidence remained under review and that allegations involving individuals named in the report were not final findings of wrongdoing, but it said the existing record was already sufficient to show that Epstein’s activities in New Mexico deserved far more scrutiny than they ever received.<br /><br />The report was especially critical of institutional failures, saying New Mexico and federal authorities effectively passed responsibility to prosecutors elsewhere while Epstein’s conduct in the state went largely unexamined. It said the U.S. Attorney’s Office for New Mexico and state officials expected the Southern District of New York to handle Epstein, but New York prosecutors concentrated on crimes tied to New York and Florida rather than building a New Mexico case. Zorro Ranch was never searched while Epstein was alive and, according to the report, was not subjected to a comprehensive law-enforcement search until March 2026, nearly seven years after his death. The Commission concluded that this passivity allowed evidence to disappear, memories to fade and potential criminal cases to become more difficult or impossible to prosecute. It also opened separate lines of inquiry into Epstein’s financial dealings, his relationships with scientific institutions and wealthy associates, and the conduct of banks, including subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan. Its clearest interim observation was devastating: Epstein continued exercising wealth and influence after becoming a registered sex offender, operated much of his system in plain sight, and New Mexico law enforcement’s decision to rely on other jurisdictions left the conduct of Epstein and his co-conspirators in the state “unexamined and unpunished.” Final findings and recommendations were deferred while the Commission continued issuing subpoenas, interviewing witnesses and searching for additional survivors and potential perpetrators.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.nmlegis.gov/handouts/HISC%20080526%20Item%201%20Interim%20Report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">NM Survivors' Truth Commission — Interim Report</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73760587</guid><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73760587/nmreport6.mp3" length="11121102" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e67ed4a6-3b23-45bf-87f6-40ebfd98aca0/e67ed4a6-3b23-45bf-87f6-40ebfd98aca0.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e67ed4a6-3b23-45bf-87f6-40ebfd98aca0/e67ed4a6-3b23-45bf-87f6-40ebfd98aca0.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e67ed4a6-3b23-45bf-87f6-40ebfd98aca0/e67ed4a6-3b23-45bf-87f6-40ebfd98aca0.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The New Mexico Survivors’ Truth Commission’s 119-page interim report described Zorro Ranch as a major and largely neglected component of Jeffrey Epstein’s broader operation, concluding that authorities failed for years to seriously investigate what...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The New Mexico Survivors’ Truth Commission’s 119-page interim report described Zorro Ranch as a major and largely neglected component of Jeffrey Epstein’s broader operation, concluding that authorities failed for years to seriously investigate what happened there. According to the Commission, Epstein maintained an elaborate, highly controlled compound in New Mexico where survivors reported sexual abuse and where young women were routinely transported, housed and brought into Epstein’s orbit. The report pointed to witness testimony, flight records, seized electronic evidence and FBI material suggesting that Zorro Ranch was integrated into the same system of recruitment, secrecy and exploitation seen at Epstein’s other properties. Among the evidence discussed were computer folders labeled “ZORRO,” discs referencing nude photographs associated with the ranch, accounts of young women arriving by aircraft, efforts to impose restrictive nondisclosure agreements on workers, and survivor statements describing abuse in New Mexico. The Commission stressed that the evidence remained under review and that allegations involving individuals named in the report were not final findings of wrongdoing, but it said the existing record was already sufficient to show that Epstein’s activities in New Mexico deserved far more scrutiny than they ever received.<br /><br />The report was especially critical of institutional failures, saying New Mexico and federal authorities effectively passed responsibility to prosecutors elsewhere while Epstein’s conduct in the state went largely unexamined. It said the U.S. Attorney’s Office for New Mexico and state officials expected the Southern District of New York to handle Epstein, but New York prosecutors concentrated on crimes tied to New York and Florida rather than building a New Mexico case. Zorro Ranch was never searched while Epstein was alive and, according to the report, was not subjected to a comprehensive law-enforcement search until March 2026, nearly seven years after his death. The Commission concluded that this passivity allowed evidence to disappear, memories to fade and potential criminal cases to become more difficult or impossible to prosecute. It also opened separate lines of inquiry into Epstein’s financial dealings, his relationships with scientific institutions and wealthy associates, and the conduct of banks, including subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan. Its clearest interim observation was devastating: Epstein continued exercising wealth and influence after becoming a registered sex offender, operated much of his system in plain sight, and New Mexico law enforcement’s decision to rely on other jurisdictions left the conduct of Epstein and his co-conspirators in the state “unexamined and unpunished.” Final findings and recommendations were deferred while the Commission continued issuing subpoenas, interviewing witnesses and searching for additional survivors and potential perpetrators.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.nmlegis.gov/handouts/HISC%20080526%20Item%201%20Interim%20Report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">NM Survivors' Truth Commission — Interim Report</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>696</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The DNA/Genetics Battle Between Kohberger And The State (8/11/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-dna-genetics-battle-between-kohberger-and-the-state-8-11-26--73769800</link><description><![CDATA[<br />In the lead-up to Bryan Kohberger’s trial, some of the most consequential legal fighting centered on the DNA recovered from the knife sheath found beneath Madison Mogen’s body and the investigative genetic genealogy, or IGG, process that investigators used to identify Kohberger as a suspect. Authorities had extracted a single-source male DNA profile from the sheath and later sent the sample to Othram, which developed a SNP profile that could be compared against genealogy databases that permitted law-enforcement searches. Investigators used that information to build family trees that eventually pointed toward Kohberger, after which authorities collected trash from his family’s Pennsylvania home and obtained DNA that helped connect his family to the sheath sample. Kohberger’s defense spent years seeking the underlying IGG records, laboratory materials, family-tree information and details about how Othram and the FBI conducted the genealogy work. That discovery fight produced multiple motions to compel, closed hearings and court-ordered disclosures under seal as the defense argued that it needed the material to examine whether the investigative process had been scientifically reliable and constitutionally permissible.<br /><br />The fight eventually moved from obtaining the evidence to trying to keep it out of court altogether. Kohberger’s attorneys argued that law enforcement had violated his constitutional rights by conducting the IGG investigation without a warrant and by later obtaining DNA through a trash pull at his parents’ home, contending that evidence developed from those steps and subsequent warrants should be suppressed as fruit of an unlawful search. Judge Steven Hippler rejected that argument in February 2025, ruling that Kohberger had not established a constitutionally protected privacy interest that made the IGG process or abandoned trash unlawful searches and declining to suppress the resulting evidence. The defense then continued attacking the genealogy evidence through motions in limine, arguing that the State should not be permitted to present the IGG process to the jury and raising separate challenges involving terminology such as “touch” or “contact” DNA and the disclosure of expert testimony. The State maintained that IGG had primarily been an investigative lead rather than the evidentiary foundation of its case, while prosecutors intended to rely on the direct comparison between Kohberger’s DNA and the profile recovered from the sheath. By the time trial approached, the DNA battle had therefore become two interconnected fights: whether the genetic genealogy that led investigators to Kohberger had been lawfully conducted, and exactly how much of that complicated investigative history the jury would ultimately be allowed to hear.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73769800</guid><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73769800/megabattlekohbergergeneticsdna.mp3" length="29821849" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9db1d5f0-c59d-4783-ab58-af8dea4332be/9db1d5f0-c59d-4783-ab58-af8dea4332be.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9db1d5f0-c59d-4783-ab58-af8dea4332be/9db1d5f0-c59d-4783-ab58-af8dea4332be.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9db1d5f0-c59d-4783-ab58-af8dea4332be/9db1d5f0-c59d-4783-ab58-af8dea4332be.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In the lead-up to Bryan Kohberger’s trial, some of the most consequential legal fighting centered on the DNA recovered from the knife sheath found beneath Madison Mogen’s body and the investigative genetic genealogy, or IGG, process that investigators...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br />In the lead-up to Bryan Kohberger’s trial, some of the most consequential legal fighting centered on the DNA recovered from the knife sheath found beneath Madison Mogen’s body and the investigative genetic genealogy, or IGG, process that investigators used to identify Kohberger as a suspect. Authorities had extracted a single-source male DNA profile from the sheath and later sent the sample to Othram, which developed a SNP profile that could be compared against genealogy databases that permitted law-enforcement searches. Investigators used that information to build family trees that eventually pointed toward Kohberger, after which authorities collected trash from his family’s Pennsylvania home and obtained DNA that helped connect his family to the sheath sample. Kohberger’s defense spent years seeking the underlying IGG records, laboratory materials, family-tree information and details about how Othram and the FBI conducted the genealogy work. That discovery fight produced multiple motions to compel, closed hearings and court-ordered disclosures under seal as the defense argued that it needed the material to examine whether the investigative process had been scientifically reliable and constitutionally permissible.<br /><br />The fight eventually moved from obtaining the evidence to trying to keep it out of court altogether. Kohberger’s attorneys argued that law enforcement had violated his constitutional rights by conducting the IGG investigation without a warrant and by later obtaining DNA through a trash pull at his parents’ home, contending that evidence developed from those steps and subsequent warrants should be suppressed as fruit of an unlawful search. Judge Steven Hippler rejected that argument in February 2025, ruling that Kohberger had not established a constitutionally protected privacy interest that made the IGG process or abandoned trash unlawful searches and declining to suppress the resulting evidence. The defense then continued attacking the genealogy evidence through motions in limine, arguing that the State should not be permitted to present the IGG process to the jury and raising separate challenges involving terminology such as “touch” or “contact” DNA and the disclosure of expert testimony. The State maintained that IGG had primarily been an investigative lead rather than the evidentiary foundation of its case, while prosecutors intended to rely on the direct comparison between Kohberger’s DNA and the profile recovered from the sheath. By the time trial approached, the DNA battle had therefore become two interconnected fights: whether the genetic genealogy that led investigators to Kohberger had been lawfully conducted, and exactly how much of that complicated investigative history the jury would ultimately be allowed to hear.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1864</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The Goncalves Family Hire Shannon Gray To Represent Them (8/11/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-goncalves-family-hire-shannon-gray-to-represent-them-8-11-26--73769799</link><description><![CDATA[In December 2022, the family of Kaylee Goncalves hired Moscow attorney Shanon Gray to represent them as frustration grew over the investigation into the murders of Kaylee, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. At the time, no suspect had been publicly identified, and Steve and Kristi Goncalves had become increasingly outspoken about what they believed was inconsistent communication from investigators. The family had publicly questioned why certain information was being withheld, challenged some of the early statements coming from law enforcement and expressed concern that they were learning important developments through the media instead of directly from authorities. Gray was brought in to serve as the family’s legal representative and advocate, helping them communicate with investigators while also protecting their interests as the highly publicized investigation continued.<br /><br />Gray’s role became even more significant after Bryan Kohberger was arrested in Pennsylvania on December 30, 2022, and extradited to Idaho to face four counts of first-degree murder and burglary. He accompanied the Goncalves family through the court process and frequently spoke publicly on their behalf, including after Kohberger’s first Idaho court appearance, when Gray said the family understood that the criminal justice process was only beginning and that they intended to remain involved for the long haul. He later represented their interests during disputes over the case’s gag order and other legal issues, effectively becoming the family’s voice as the prosecution moved forward. What had begun as an effort to obtain better communication and greater transparency during the investigation ultimately developed into a long-term attorney-client relationship that continued throughout the prosecution of Kohberger.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73769799</guid><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73769799/megagoncalveshireshannongray.mp3" length="29438999" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/85af7447-b62c-4e8b-84e1-dd940bbe2671/85af7447-b62c-4e8b-84e1-dd940bbe2671.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/85af7447-b62c-4e8b-84e1-dd940bbe2671/85af7447-b62c-4e8b-84e1-dd940bbe2671.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/85af7447-b62c-4e8b-84e1-dd940bbe2671/85af7447-b62c-4e8b-84e1-dd940bbe2671.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In December 2022, the family of Kaylee Goncalves hired Moscow attorney Shanon Gray to represent them as frustration grew over the investigation into the murders of Kaylee, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. At the time, no suspect had been...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In December 2022, the family of Kaylee Goncalves hired Moscow attorney Shanon Gray to represent them as frustration grew over the investigation into the murders of Kaylee, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. At the time, no suspect had been publicly identified, and Steve and Kristi Goncalves had become increasingly outspoken about what they believed was inconsistent communication from investigators. The family had publicly questioned why certain information was being withheld, challenged some of the early statements coming from law enforcement and expressed concern that they were learning important developments through the media instead of directly from authorities. Gray was brought in to serve as the family’s legal representative and advocate, helping them communicate with investigators while also protecting their interests as the highly publicized investigation continued.<br /><br />Gray’s role became even more significant after Bryan Kohberger was arrested in Pennsylvania on December 30, 2022, and extradited to Idaho to face four counts of first-degree murder and burglary. He accompanied the Goncalves family through the court process and frequently spoke publicly on their behalf, including after Kohberger’s first Idaho court appearance, when Gray said the family understood that the criminal justice process was only beginning and that they intended to remain involved for the long haul. He later represented their interests during disputes over the case’s gag order and other legal issues, effectively becoming the family’s voice as the prosecution moved forward. What had begun as an effort to obtain better communication and greater transparency during the investigation ultimately developed into a long-term attorney-client relationship that continued throughout the prosecution of Kohberger.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1840</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:    Judge Hippler's Order Memorializing The Limine Oral Rulings (8/11/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-judge-hippler-s-order-memorializing-the-limine-oral-rulings-8-11-26--73769798</link><description><![CDATA[This order memorializes the oral rulings made by Judge John C. Judge on April 17, 2025, in the Bryan Kohberger case regarding several motions in limine. The court granted the prosecution's request to preclude defense counsel from mentioning or suggesting that third parties—specifically “other men” or unidentified persons—are responsible for the crimes unless the defense can provide a proper evidentiary foundation outside the presence of the jury. This aims to prevent speculation or unsupported accusations from being introduced at trial. Additionally, the judge ruled that the defense may not use characterizations like “rush to judgment” or claims of a biased investigation unless such arguments are supported by specific, admissible evidence.<br /><br />The court also ruled in favor of the prosecution’s request to limit or exclude any irrelevant or inflammatory evidence, including any references to the victims’ personal histories, sexual activity, or alleged drug use, unless it directly relates to the defense's theory of the case and passes legal scrutiny. Similarly, the judge limited the introduction of expert opinions unless those experts have been properly disclosed and vetted. These rulings were intended to ensure a fair trial, maintain focus on relevant issues, and reduce the potential for prejudicial arguments that could mislead or confuse the jury.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/041825+Order+Memorializing+Oral+Rulings+on+Motions+in+Limine.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">041825+Order+Memorializing+Oral+Rulings+on+Motions+in+Limine.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73769798</guid><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 06:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73769798/megahipplermemorializelimine.mp3" length="34034460" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7c6900ab-9fe6-4832-b8d3-18aba483b391/7c6900ab-9fe6-4832-b8d3-18aba483b391.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7c6900ab-9fe6-4832-b8d3-18aba483b391/7c6900ab-9fe6-4832-b8d3-18aba483b391.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7c6900ab-9fe6-4832-b8d3-18aba483b391/7c6900ab-9fe6-4832-b8d3-18aba483b391.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>This order memorializes the oral rulings made by Judge John C. Judge on April 17, 2025, in the Bryan Kohberger case regarding several motions in limine. The court granted the prosecution's request to preclude defense counsel from mentioning or...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[This order memorializes the oral rulings made by Judge John C. Judge on April 17, 2025, in the Bryan Kohberger case regarding several motions in limine. The court granted the prosecution's request to preclude defense counsel from mentioning or suggesting that third parties—specifically “other men” or unidentified persons—are responsible for the crimes unless the defense can provide a proper evidentiary foundation outside the presence of the jury. This aims to prevent speculation or unsupported accusations from being introduced at trial. Additionally, the judge ruled that the defense may not use characterizations like “rush to judgment” or claims of a biased investigation unless such arguments are supported by specific, admissible evidence.<br /><br />The court also ruled in favor of the prosecution’s request to limit or exclude any irrelevant or inflammatory evidence, including any references to the victims’ personal histories, sexual activity, or alleged drug use, unless it directly relates to the defense's theory of the case and passes legal scrutiny. Similarly, the judge limited the introduction of expert opinions unless those experts have been properly disclosed and vetted. These rulings were intended to ensure a fair trial, maintain focus on relevant issues, and reduce the potential for prejudicial arguments that could mislead or confuse the jury.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/041825+Order+Memorializing+Oral+Rulings+on+Motions+in+Limine.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">041825+Order+Memorializing+Oral+Rulings+on+Motions+in+Limine.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2128</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Judge Hippler's Order On Bryan Kohberger's Capital Punishment Motion (Part 8)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/judge-hippler-s-order-on-bryan-kohberger-s-capital-punishment-motion-part-8--73395946</link><description><![CDATA[In State v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, Judge Steven Hippler issued a Memorandum Decision and Order addressing multiple defense motions aimed at removing the death penalty as a sentencing option. The defense presented 12 motions challenging various aspects of Idaho's capital punishment framework, including the constitutionality of execution methods and the applicability of certain aggravating factors. After thorough consideration, Judge Hippler denied all motions, affirming that the death penalty remains a viable sentencing option in this case.<br /><br />The court's 55-page decision systematically addressed each defense argument, referencing precedents set by the Idaho Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court that uphold the constitutionality of capital punishment. Judge Hippler concluded that the defense's claims did not warrant the removal of the death penalty, allowing the prosecution to continue seeking it as a potential sentence. This ruling signifies a pivotal moment in the proceedings, underscoring the court's commitment to adhering to established legal standards in capital cases. <br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/isc.coi/CR01-24-31665/2024/112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73395946</guid><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 04:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73395946/moscowdeathorder8.mp3" length="13465017" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4d04ce38-38d6-40d0-9729-26215a706e11/4d04ce38-38d6-40d0-9729-26215a706e11.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4d04ce38-38d6-40d0-9729-26215a706e11/4d04ce38-38d6-40d0-9729-26215a706e11.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4d04ce38-38d6-40d0-9729-26215a706e11/4d04ce38-38d6-40d0-9729-26215a706e11.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In State v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, Judge Steven Hippler issued a Memorandum Decision and Order addressing multiple defense motions aimed at removing the death penalty as a sentencing option. The defense presented 12 motions...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In State v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, Judge Steven Hippler issued a Memorandum Decision and Order addressing multiple defense motions aimed at removing the death penalty as a sentencing option. The defense presented 12 motions challenging various aspects of Idaho's capital punishment framework, including the constitutionality of execution methods and the applicability of certain aggravating factors. After thorough consideration, Judge Hippler denied all motions, affirming that the death penalty remains a viable sentencing option in this case.<br /><br />The court's 55-page decision systematically addressed each defense argument, referencing precedents set by the Idaho Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court that uphold the constitutionality of capital punishment. Judge Hippler concluded that the defense's claims did not warrant the removal of the death penalty, allowing the prosecution to continue seeking it as a potential sentence. This ruling signifies a pivotal moment in the proceedings, underscoring the court's commitment to adhering to established legal standards in capital cases. <br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/isc.coi/CR01-24-31665/2024/112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>842</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Judge Hippler's Order On Bryan Kohberger's Capital Punishment Motion (Part 7)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/judge-hippler-s-order-on-bryan-kohberger-s-capital-punishment-motion-part-7--73395944</link><description><![CDATA[In State v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, Judge Steven Hippler issued a Memorandum Decision and Order addressing multiple defense motions aimed at removing the death penalty as a sentencing option. The defense presented 12 motions challenging various aspects of Idaho's capital punishment framework, including the constitutionality of execution methods and the applicability of certain aggravating factors. After thorough consideration, Judge Hippler denied all motions, affirming that the death penalty remains a viable sentencing option in this case.<br /><br />The court's 55-page decision systematically addressed each defense argument, referencing precedents set by the Idaho Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court that uphold the constitutionality of capital punishment. Judge Hippler concluded that the defense's claims did not warrant the removal of the death penalty, allowing the prosecution to continue seeking it as a potential sentence. This ruling signifies a pivotal moment in the proceedings, underscoring the court's commitment to adhering to established legal standards in capital cases. <br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/isc.coi/CR01-24-31665/2024/112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73395944</guid><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 02:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73395944/moscowdeathorder7.mp3" length="12091603" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/88836e20-0b4a-42cd-84d1-4840e0d39d12/88836e20-0b4a-42cd-84d1-4840e0d39d12.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/88836e20-0b4a-42cd-84d1-4840e0d39d12/88836e20-0b4a-42cd-84d1-4840e0d39d12.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/88836e20-0b4a-42cd-84d1-4840e0d39d12/88836e20-0b4a-42cd-84d1-4840e0d39d12.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In State v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, Judge Steven Hippler issued a Memorandum Decision and Order addressing multiple defense motions aimed at removing the death penalty as a sentencing option. The defense presented 12 motions...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In State v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, Judge Steven Hippler issued a Memorandum Decision and Order addressing multiple defense motions aimed at removing the death penalty as a sentencing option. The defense presented 12 motions challenging various aspects of Idaho's capital punishment framework, including the constitutionality of execution methods and the applicability of certain aggravating factors. After thorough consideration, Judge Hippler denied all motions, affirming that the death penalty remains a viable sentencing option in this case.<br /><br />The court's 55-page decision systematically addressed each defense argument, referencing precedents set by the Idaho Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court that uphold the constitutionality of capital punishment. Judge Hippler concluded that the defense's claims did not warrant the removal of the death penalty, allowing the prosecution to continue seeking it as a potential sentence. This ruling signifies a pivotal moment in the proceedings, underscoring the court's commitment to adhering to established legal standards in capital cases. <br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/isc.coi/CR01-24-31665/2024/112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>756</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Tyler Robinson Preliminary Hearing Transcripts (Day 1-Part 3) (8/10/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcripts-day-1-part-3-8-10-26--73764547</link><description><![CDATA[Day one of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing on July 6, 2026, largely centered on prosecutors beginning to construct a timeline of Charlie Kirk’s killing at Utah Valley University and establishing the authenticity of the surveillance footage and investigative records they intended to use against Robinson. Former UVU police officer Chris Bagley described the moment the gunshot rang out during Kirk’s September 10, 2025 event and the chaos that followed, while Utah State Bureau of Investigation agent David Hull walked the court through the enormous video-review effort undertaken after the shooting. Hull testified that investigators examined hundreds of hours of surveillance footage and ultimately tracked a person they believed was Robinson moving around the UVU campus at several different points that day. Prosecutors introduced surveillance recordings from multiple locations as they attempted to connect the person seen approaching the campus, moving toward the area surrounding the Losee Center, and later leaving the area to Robinson. Three separate videos depicting Kirk being shot were admitted, although Judge Tony Graf determined that their graphic nature warranted restricting their display to the attorneys’ and judge’s monitors rather than broadcasting them throughout the courtroom. Kirk’s widow, Erika, and his parents left the courtroom while the videos were reviewed. Prosecutors also introduced Kirk’s autopsy report through Hull, which listed his cause of death as a gunshot wound to the neck and the manner of death as homicide<br /><br />The defense spent much of the first day attacking the manner in which the prosecution was getting its evidence into the record rather than attempting to disprove the entire prosecution theory at that stage. Kathryn Nester and Robinson’s attorneys repeatedly raised hearsay, foundation and authentication objections, arguing that investigators were being permitted to introduce reports, statements and records created by other people without those individuals appearing personally to testify. Judge Graf overruled most of those objections, reflecting the substantially lower evidentiary threshold governing a Utah preliminary hearing, whose purpose was only to determine whether probable cause existed to send Robinson to trial rather than whether prosecutors could prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. One significant exception involved an edited compilation of surveillance footage, which Graf declined to admit in that form and required prosecutors to replace with the underlying unedited material. Hull’s testimony also revealed the scope of the prosecution’s surveillance theory: investigators claimed Robinson had appeared on or around the UVU campus multiple times on September 10 and that they were attempting to stitch those appearances together into a continuous identification of the alleged shooter. By the end of day one, prosecutors had established the killing itself, the medical cause of Kirk’s death, the existence and authenticity of substantial video evidence and the beginnings of their effort to identify Robinson as the person captured in that footage. They had not yet presented many of the pieces expected to become more consequential later in the hearing, including the rifle and DNA evidence, Robinson’s alleged communications and admissions, and testimony concerning his roommate Lance Twiggs.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73764547</guid><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 00:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73764547/robinsonprelimday1part3.mp3" length="11401134" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0b055d7a-5580-447f-a73b-e186540ac9ae/0b055d7a-5580-447f-a73b-e186540ac9ae.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0b055d7a-5580-447f-a73b-e186540ac9ae/0b055d7a-5580-447f-a73b-e186540ac9ae.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0b055d7a-5580-447f-a73b-e186540ac9ae/0b055d7a-5580-447f-a73b-e186540ac9ae.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Day one of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing on July 6, 2026, largely centered on prosecutors beginning to construct a timeline of Charlie Kirk’s killing at Utah Valley University and establishing the authenticity of the surveillance footage and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Day one of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing on July 6, 2026, largely centered on prosecutors beginning to construct a timeline of Charlie Kirk’s killing at Utah Valley University and establishing the authenticity of the surveillance footage and investigative records they intended to use against Robinson. Former UVU police officer Chris Bagley described the moment the gunshot rang out during Kirk’s September 10, 2025 event and the chaos that followed, while Utah State Bureau of Investigation agent David Hull walked the court through the enormous video-review effort undertaken after the shooting. Hull testified that investigators examined hundreds of hours of surveillance footage and ultimately tracked a person they believed was Robinson moving around the UVU campus at several different points that day. Prosecutors introduced surveillance recordings from multiple locations as they attempted to connect the person seen approaching the campus, moving toward the area surrounding the Losee Center, and later leaving the area to Robinson. Three separate videos depicting Kirk being shot were admitted, although Judge Tony Graf determined that their graphic nature warranted restricting their display to the attorneys’ and judge’s monitors rather than broadcasting them throughout the courtroom. Kirk’s widow, Erika, and his parents left the courtroom while the videos were reviewed. Prosecutors also introduced Kirk’s autopsy report through Hull, which listed his cause of death as a gunshot wound to the neck and the manner of death as homicide<br /><br />The defense spent much of the first day attacking the manner in which the prosecution was getting its evidence into the record rather than attempting to disprove the entire prosecution theory at that stage. Kathryn Nester and Robinson’s attorneys repeatedly raised hearsay, foundation and authentication objections, arguing that investigators were being permitted to introduce reports, statements and records created by other people without those individuals appearing personally to testify. Judge Graf overruled most of those objections, reflecting the substantially lower evidentiary threshold governing a Utah preliminary hearing, whose purpose was only to determine whether probable cause existed to send Robinson to trial rather than whether prosecutors could prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. One significant exception involved an edited compilation of surveillance footage, which Graf declined to admit in that form and required prosecutors to replace with the underlying unedited material. Hull’s testimony also revealed the scope of the prosecution’s surveillance theory: investigators claimed Robinson had appeared on or around the UVU campus multiple times on September 10 and that they were attempting to stitch those appearances together into a continuous identification of the alleged shooter. By the end of day one, prosecutors had established the killing itself, the medical cause of Kirk’s death, the existence and authenticity of substantial video evidence and the beginnings of their effort to identify Robinson as the person captured in that footage. They had not yet presented many of the pieces expected to become more consequential later in the hearing, including the rifle and DNA evidence, Robinson’s alleged communications and admissions, and testimony concerning his roommate Lance Twiggs.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>713</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvu</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Tyler Robinson Preliminary Hearing Transcripts (Day 1-Part 2) (8/10/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcripts-day-1-part-2-8-10-26--73760604</link><description><![CDATA[Day one of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing on July 6, 2026, largely centered on prosecutors beginning to construct a timeline of Charlie Kirk’s killing at Utah Valley University and establishing the authenticity of the surveillance footage and investigative records they intended to use against Robinson. Former UVU police officer Chris Bagley described the moment the gunshot rang out during Kirk’s September 10, 2025 event and the chaos that followed, while Utah State Bureau of Investigation agent David Hull walked the court through the enormous video-review effort undertaken after the shooting. Hull testified that investigators examined hundreds of hours of surveillance footage and ultimately tracked a person they believed was Robinson moving around the UVU campus at several different points that day. Prosecutors introduced surveillance recordings from multiple locations as they attempted to connect the person seen approaching the campus, moving toward the area surrounding the Losee Center, and later leaving the area to Robinson. Three separate videos depicting Kirk being shot were admitted, although Judge Tony Graf determined that their graphic nature warranted restricting their display to the attorneys’ and judge’s monitors rather than broadcasting them throughout the courtroom. Kirk’s widow, Erika, and his parents left the courtroom while the videos were reviewed. Prosecutors also introduced Kirk’s autopsy report through Hull, which listed his cause of death as a gunshot wound to the neck and the manner of death as homicide<br /><br />The defense spent much of the first day attacking the manner in which the prosecution was getting its evidence into the record rather than attempting to disprove the entire prosecution theory at that stage. Kathryn Nester and Robinson’s attorneys repeatedly raised hearsay, foundation and authentication objections, arguing that investigators were being permitted to introduce reports, statements and records created by other people without those individuals appearing personally to testify. Judge Graf overruled most of those objections, reflecting the substantially lower evidentiary threshold governing a Utah preliminary hearing, whose purpose was only to determine whether probable cause existed to send Robinson to trial rather than whether prosecutors could prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. One significant exception involved an edited compilation of surveillance footage, which Graf declined to admit in that form and required prosecutors to replace with the underlying unedited material. Hull’s testimony also revealed the scope of the prosecution’s surveillance theory: investigators claimed Robinson had appeared on or around the UVU campus multiple times on September 10 and that they were attempting to stitch those appearances together into a continuous identification of the alleged shooter. By the end of day one, prosecutors had established the killing itself, the medical cause of Kirk’s death, the existence and authenticity of substantial video evidence and the beginnings of their effort to identify Robinson as the person captured in that footage. They had not yet presented many of the pieces expected to become more consequential later in the hearing, including the rifle and DNA evidence, Robinson’s alleged communications and admissions, and testimony concerning his roommate Lance Twiggs.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73760604</guid><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 22:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73760604/robinsonprelimday1part2.mp3" length="11668210" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/95c4a6c3-7c7f-4fe2-9a3d-4cf4d8287292/95c4a6c3-7c7f-4fe2-9a3d-4cf4d8287292.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/95c4a6c3-7c7f-4fe2-9a3d-4cf4d8287292/95c4a6c3-7c7f-4fe2-9a3d-4cf4d8287292.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/95c4a6c3-7c7f-4fe2-9a3d-4cf4d8287292/95c4a6c3-7c7f-4fe2-9a3d-4cf4d8287292.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Day one of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing on July 6, 2026, largely centered on prosecutors beginning to construct a timeline of Charlie Kirk’s killing at Utah Valley University and establishing the authenticity of the surveillance footage and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Day one of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing on July 6, 2026, largely centered on prosecutors beginning to construct a timeline of Charlie Kirk’s killing at Utah Valley University and establishing the authenticity of the surveillance footage and investigative records they intended to use against Robinson. Former UVU police officer Chris Bagley described the moment the gunshot rang out during Kirk’s September 10, 2025 event and the chaos that followed, while Utah State Bureau of Investigation agent David Hull walked the court through the enormous video-review effort undertaken after the shooting. Hull testified that investigators examined hundreds of hours of surveillance footage and ultimately tracked a person they believed was Robinson moving around the UVU campus at several different points that day. Prosecutors introduced surveillance recordings from multiple locations as they attempted to connect the person seen approaching the campus, moving toward the area surrounding the Losee Center, and later leaving the area to Robinson. Three separate videos depicting Kirk being shot were admitted, although Judge Tony Graf determined that their graphic nature warranted restricting their display to the attorneys’ and judge’s monitors rather than broadcasting them throughout the courtroom. Kirk’s widow, Erika, and his parents left the courtroom while the videos were reviewed. Prosecutors also introduced Kirk’s autopsy report through Hull, which listed his cause of death as a gunshot wound to the neck and the manner of death as homicide<br /><br />The defense spent much of the first day attacking the manner in which the prosecution was getting its evidence into the record rather than attempting to disprove the entire prosecution theory at that stage. Kathryn Nester and Robinson’s attorneys repeatedly raised hearsay, foundation and authentication objections, arguing that investigators were being permitted to introduce reports, statements and records created by other people without those individuals appearing personally to testify. Judge Graf overruled most of those objections, reflecting the substantially lower evidentiary threshold governing a Utah preliminary hearing, whose purpose was only to determine whether probable cause existed to send Robinson to trial rather than whether prosecutors could prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. One significant exception involved an edited compilation of surveillance footage, which Graf declined to admit in that form and required prosecutors to replace with the underlying unedited material. Hull’s testimony also revealed the scope of the prosecution’s surveillance theory: investigators claimed Robinson had appeared on or around the UVU campus multiple times on September 10 and that they were attempting to stitch those appearances together into a continuous identification of the alleged shooter. By the end of day one, prosecutors had established the killing itself, the medical cause of Kirk’s death, the existence and authenticity of substantial video evidence and the beginnings of their effort to identify Robinson as the person captured in that footage. They had not yet presented many of the pieces expected to become more consequential later in the hearing, including the rifle and DNA evidence, Robinson’s alleged communications and admissions, and testimony concerning his roommate Lance Twiggs.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>730</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvu</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Seven Years of Questions After Jeffrey Epstein’s Death (8/10/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/seven-years-of-questions-after-jeffrey-epstein-s-death-8-10-26--73764437</link><description><![CDATA[Seven years after Jeffrey Epstein was found dead inside a federal jail cell, the public is still being asked to accept an official narrative without the kind of transparency that would actually earn trust. Epstein’s death ended the possibility of putting him on trial, forcing him to answer questions under oath, and publicly exposing the full machinery surrounding his operation, including the money, the recruiters, the employees, the powerful relationships, and the institutions that enabled him. Instead, the years since have been filled with redactions, sealed records, civil lawsuits, contradictory statements, government reports, bank settlements, and endless arguments over terminology while the larger questions remain unresolved. The problem is not that every conspiracy theory is true; many are unsupported or flat-out wrong. The problem is that institutional failures, secrecy, preferential treatment, and decades of unanswered questions created the distrust in the first place, and the government has done far too little to repair it with complete evidence and transparency.<br /><br />Seven years should have been more than enough time to follow the money, examine financial records, interview witnesses, trace travel, investigate recruiters and facilitators, and explain why accountability remained so limited around a criminal operation that touched some of the most powerful people and institutions in the world. Instead of asking the public to simply trust official assurances, authorities should be showing exactly what was investigated, who was questioned, what evidence was developed, and why certain prosecutorial decisions were made. Epstein’s survivors deserved that level of accountability years ago, and the public still deserves it now. Until the unanswered questions are confronted with evidence instead of slogans, until transparency replaces damage control, and until the government fully explains how such a sprawling operation produced so little criminal accountability, the skepticism will remain.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73764437</guid><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 20:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73764437/7yearanniversaryepsteinmonologue.mp3" length="13090525" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cc703a84-ea36-46a5-856e-591d395a23da/cc703a84-ea36-46a5-856e-591d395a23da.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cc703a84-ea36-46a5-856e-591d395a23da/cc703a84-ea36-46a5-856e-591d395a23da.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cc703a84-ea36-46a5-856e-591d395a23da/cc703a84-ea36-46a5-856e-591d395a23da.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Seven years after Jeffrey Epstein was found dead inside a federal jail cell, the public is still being asked to accept an official narrative without the kind of transparency that would actually earn trust. Epstein’s death ended the possibility of...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Seven years after Jeffrey Epstein was found dead inside a federal jail cell, the public is still being asked to accept an official narrative without the kind of transparency that would actually earn trust. Epstein’s death ended the possibility of putting him on trial, forcing him to answer questions under oath, and publicly exposing the full machinery surrounding his operation, including the money, the recruiters, the employees, the powerful relationships, and the institutions that enabled him. Instead, the years since have been filled with redactions, sealed records, civil lawsuits, contradictory statements, government reports, bank settlements, and endless arguments over terminology while the larger questions remain unresolved. The problem is not that every conspiracy theory is true; many are unsupported or flat-out wrong. The problem is that institutional failures, secrecy, preferential treatment, and decades of unanswered questions created the distrust in the first place, and the government has done far too little to repair it with complete evidence and transparency.<br /><br />Seven years should have been more than enough time to follow the money, examine financial records, interview witnesses, trace travel, investigate recruiters and facilitators, and explain why accountability remained so limited around a criminal operation that touched some of the most powerful people and institutions in the world. Instead of asking the public to simply trust official assurances, authorities should be showing exactly what was investigated, who was questioned, what evidence was developed, and why certain prosecutorial decisions were made. Epstein’s survivors deserved that level of accountability years ago, and the public still deserves it now. Until the unanswered questions are confronted with evidence instead of slogans, until transparency replaces damage control, and until the government fully explains how such a sprawling operation produced so little criminal accountability, the skepticism will remain.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>819</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Murder In Moscow: Psychologist Criticizes Prosecutors Over Bryan Kohberger Agreement (8/10/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-psychologist-criticizes-prosecutors-over-bryan-kohberger-agreement-8-10-26--73764047</link><description><![CDATA[Forensic psychologist Dr. Kris Mohandie argued that the plea agreement that spared Bryan Kohberger from the death penalty was fundamentally flawed because prosecutors never required him to give a detailed account of how or why he killed Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. Kohberger pleaded guilty in July 2025 and received four consecutive life sentences without parole, plus an additional 10 years, but in July 2026 he filed for post-conviction relief claiming ineffective assistance of counsel, alleging that he had been misled and again asserting his innocence. Mohandie said prosecutors should have forced Kohberger to commit to a complete version of events before accepting the plea, even if they suspected he would lie. Without that confession, Mohandie argued, Kohberger was left with room to later claim that he had been coerced, poorly represented or never truly admitted to the underlying facts of the murders. In his view, the plea deal gave prosecutors finality on paper but failed to extract the kind of detailed admission that could now be used to confront Kohberger’s changing claims.<br /><br />Mohandie also criticized the deal for the renewed emotional toll it was placing on the victims’ families, arguing that the post-conviction proceedings were forcing them back into a case they had been told was effectively over. He characterized Kohberger’s latest legal maneuvering as consistent with what he viewed as a desire to outsmart the system, maintain notoriety and continue controlling the narrative around himself. Mohandie pointed in particular to Kohberger’s handwritten petition and his decision to contact a reporter from prison before filing it as evidence that he continued to seek attention even after conviction. He described Kohberger as someone who believed he was smarter and more exceptional than others, while cautioning against treating convicted killers as fascinating or uniquely brilliant figures. The larger criticism was that prosecutors had an opportunity during the plea negotiations to pin Kohberger to a specific account of the murders and failed to do so, leaving an opening for exactly the kind of post-conviction challenge now unfolding.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.foxnews.com/us/bryan-kohberger-post-conviction-relief-bid-enabled-flawed-plea-deal-psychologist-argues" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bryan Kohberger's plea deal was a mistake, says renowned forensic psychologist | Fox News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73764047</guid><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 18:30:05 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73764047/flaweddealenabledkohbergerappeal.mp3" length="10820171" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/16b2b354-981d-40db-8c11-08664779152d/16b2b354-981d-40db-8c11-08664779152d.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/16b2b354-981d-40db-8c11-08664779152d/16b2b354-981d-40db-8c11-08664779152d.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/16b2b354-981d-40db-8c11-08664779152d/16b2b354-981d-40db-8c11-08664779152d.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Forensic psychologist Dr. Kris Mohandie argued that the plea agreement that spared Bryan Kohberger from the death penalty was fundamentally flawed because prosecutors never required him to give a detailed account of how or why he killed Madison Mogen,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Forensic psychologist Dr. Kris Mohandie argued that the plea agreement that spared Bryan Kohberger from the death penalty was fundamentally flawed because prosecutors never required him to give a detailed account of how or why he killed Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. Kohberger pleaded guilty in July 2025 and received four consecutive life sentences without parole, plus an additional 10 years, but in July 2026 he filed for post-conviction relief claiming ineffective assistance of counsel, alleging that he had been misled and again asserting his innocence. Mohandie said prosecutors should have forced Kohberger to commit to a complete version of events before accepting the plea, even if they suspected he would lie. Without that confession, Mohandie argued, Kohberger was left with room to later claim that he had been coerced, poorly represented or never truly admitted to the underlying facts of the murders. In his view, the plea deal gave prosecutors finality on paper but failed to extract the kind of detailed admission that could now be used to confront Kohberger’s changing claims.<br /><br />Mohandie also criticized the deal for the renewed emotional toll it was placing on the victims’ families, arguing that the post-conviction proceedings were forcing them back into a case they had been told was effectively over. He characterized Kohberger’s latest legal maneuvering as consistent with what he viewed as a desire to outsmart the system, maintain notoriety and continue controlling the narrative around himself. Mohandie pointed in particular to Kohberger’s handwritten petition and his decision to contact a reporter from prison before filing it as evidence that he continued to seek attention even after conviction. He described Kohberger as someone who believed he was smarter and more exceptional than others, while cautioning against treating convicted killers as fascinating or uniquely brilliant figures. The larger criticism was that prosecutors had an opportunity during the plea negotiations to pin Kohberger to a specific account of the murders and failed to do so, leaving an opening for exactly the kind of post-conviction challenge now unfolding.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.foxnews.com/us/bryan-kohberger-post-conviction-relief-bid-enabled-flawed-plea-deal-psychologist-argues" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bryan Kohberger's plea deal was a mistake, says renowned forensic psychologist | Fox News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>677</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The New Mexico Epstein Commission Interim Report (Part 5) (8/10/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-new-mexico-epstein-commission-interim-report-part-5-8-10-26--73760588</link><description><![CDATA[The New Mexico Survivors’ Truth Commission’s 119-page interim report described Zorro Ranch as a major and largely neglected component of Jeffrey Epstein’s broader operation, concluding that authorities failed for years to seriously investigate what happened there. According to the Commission, Epstein maintained an elaborate, highly controlled compound in New Mexico where survivors reported sexual abuse and where young women were routinely transported, housed and brought into Epstein’s orbit. The report pointed to witness testimony, flight records, seized electronic evidence and FBI material suggesting that Zorro Ranch was integrated into the same system of recruitment, secrecy and exploitation seen at Epstein’s other properties. Among the evidence discussed were computer folders labeled “ZORRO,” discs referencing nude photographs associated with the ranch, accounts of young women arriving by aircraft, efforts to impose restrictive nondisclosure agreements on workers, and survivor statements describing abuse in New Mexico. The Commission stressed that the evidence remained under review and that allegations involving individuals named in the report were not final findings of wrongdoing, but it said the existing record was already sufficient to show that Epstein’s activities in New Mexico deserved far more scrutiny than they ever received.<br /><br />The report was especially critical of institutional failures, saying New Mexico and federal authorities effectively passed responsibility to prosecutors elsewhere while Epstein’s conduct in the state went largely unexamined. It said the U.S. Attorney’s Office for New Mexico and state officials expected the Southern District of New York to handle Epstein, but New York prosecutors concentrated on crimes tied to New York and Florida rather than building a New Mexico case. Zorro Ranch was never searched while Epstein was alive and, according to the report, was not subjected to a comprehensive law-enforcement search until March 2026, nearly seven years after his death. The Commission concluded that this passivity allowed evidence to disappear, memories to fade and potential criminal cases to become more difficult or impossible to prosecute. It also opened separate lines of inquiry into Epstein’s financial dealings, his relationships with scientific institutions and wealthy associates, and the conduct of banks, including subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan. Its clearest interim observation was devastating: Epstein continued exercising wealth and influence after becoming a registered sex offender, operated much of his system in plain sight, and New Mexico law enforcement’s decision to rely on other jurisdictions left the conduct of Epstein and his co-conspirators in the state “unexamined and unpunished.” Final findings and recommendations were deferred while the Commission continued issuing subpoenas, interviewing witnesses and searching for additional survivors and potential perpetrators.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.nmlegis.gov/handouts/HISC%20080526%20Item%201%20Interim%20Report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">NM Survivors' Truth Commission — Interim Report</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73760588</guid><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 16:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73760588/nmreport5.mp3" length="13233049" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3187710b-8d39-47e2-a97f-3dbea9d41d0c/3187710b-8d39-47e2-a97f-3dbea9d41d0c.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3187710b-8d39-47e2-a97f-3dbea9d41d0c/3187710b-8d39-47e2-a97f-3dbea9d41d0c.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3187710b-8d39-47e2-a97f-3dbea9d41d0c/3187710b-8d39-47e2-a97f-3dbea9d41d0c.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The New Mexico Survivors’ Truth Commission’s 119-page interim report described Zorro Ranch as a major and largely neglected component of Jeffrey Epstein’s broader operation, concluding that authorities failed for years to seriously investigate what...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The New Mexico Survivors’ Truth Commission’s 119-page interim report described Zorro Ranch as a major and largely neglected component of Jeffrey Epstein’s broader operation, concluding that authorities failed for years to seriously investigate what happened there. According to the Commission, Epstein maintained an elaborate, highly controlled compound in New Mexico where survivors reported sexual abuse and where young women were routinely transported, housed and brought into Epstein’s orbit. The report pointed to witness testimony, flight records, seized electronic evidence and FBI material suggesting that Zorro Ranch was integrated into the same system of recruitment, secrecy and exploitation seen at Epstein’s other properties. Among the evidence discussed were computer folders labeled “ZORRO,” discs referencing nude photographs associated with the ranch, accounts of young women arriving by aircraft, efforts to impose restrictive nondisclosure agreements on workers, and survivor statements describing abuse in New Mexico. The Commission stressed that the evidence remained under review and that allegations involving individuals named in the report were not final findings of wrongdoing, but it said the existing record was already sufficient to show that Epstein’s activities in New Mexico deserved far more scrutiny than they ever received.<br /><br />The report was especially critical of institutional failures, saying New Mexico and federal authorities effectively passed responsibility to prosecutors elsewhere while Epstein’s conduct in the state went largely unexamined. It said the U.S. Attorney’s Office for New Mexico and state officials expected the Southern District of New York to handle Epstein, but New York prosecutors concentrated on crimes tied to New York and Florida rather than building a New Mexico case. Zorro Ranch was never searched while Epstein was alive and, according to the report, was not subjected to a comprehensive law-enforcement search until March 2026, nearly seven years after his death. The Commission concluded that this passivity allowed evidence to disappear, memories to fade and potential criminal cases to become more difficult or impossible to prosecute. It also opened separate lines of inquiry into Epstein’s financial dealings, his relationships with scientific institutions and wealthy associates, and the conduct of banks, including subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan. Its clearest interim observation was devastating: Epstein continued exercising wealth and influence after becoming a registered sex offender, operated much of his system in plain sight, and New Mexico law enforcement’s decision to rely on other jurisdictions left the conduct of Epstein and his co-conspirators in the state “unexamined and unpunished.” Final findings and recommendations were deferred while the Commission continued issuing subpoenas, interviewing witnesses and searching for additional survivors and potential perpetrators.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.nmlegis.gov/handouts/HISC%20080526%20Item%201%20Interim%20Report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">NM Survivors' Truth Commission — Interim Report</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>828</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The New Mexico Epstein Commission Interim Report (Part 4) (8/10/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-new-mexico-epstein-commission-interim-report-part-4-8-10-26--73760589</link><description><![CDATA[The New Mexico Survivors’ Truth Commission’s 119-page interim report described Zorro Ranch as a major and largely neglected component of Jeffrey Epstein’s broader operation, concluding that authorities failed for years to seriously investigate what happened there. According to the Commission, Epstein maintained an elaborate, highly controlled compound in New Mexico where survivors reported sexual abuse and where young women were routinely transported, housed and brought into Epstein’s orbit. The report pointed to witness testimony, flight records, seized electronic evidence and FBI material suggesting that Zorro Ranch was integrated into the same system of recruitment, secrecy and exploitation seen at Epstein’s other properties. Among the evidence discussed were computer folders labeled “ZORRO,” discs referencing nude photographs associated with the ranch, accounts of young women arriving by aircraft, efforts to impose restrictive nondisclosure agreements on workers, and survivor statements describing abuse in New Mexico. The Commission stressed that the evidence remained under review and that allegations involving individuals named in the report were not final findings of wrongdoing, but it said the existing record was already sufficient to show that Epstein’s activities in New Mexico deserved far more scrutiny than they ever received.<br /><br />The report was especially critical of institutional failures, saying New Mexico and federal authorities effectively passed responsibility to prosecutors elsewhere while Epstein’s conduct in the state went largely unexamined. It said the U.S. Attorney’s Office for New Mexico and state officials expected the Southern District of New York to handle Epstein, but New York prosecutors concentrated on crimes tied to New York and Florida rather than building a New Mexico case. Zorro Ranch was never searched while Epstein was alive and, according to the report, was not subjected to a comprehensive law-enforcement search until March 2026, nearly seven years after his death. The Commission concluded that this passivity allowed evidence to disappear, memories to fade and potential criminal cases to become more difficult or impossible to prosecute. It also opened separate lines of inquiry into Epstein’s financial dealings, his relationships with scientific institutions and wealthy associates, and the conduct of banks, including subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan. Its clearest interim observation was devastating: Epstein continued exercising wealth and influence after becoming a registered sex offender, operated much of his system in plain sight, and New Mexico law enforcement’s decision to rely on other jurisdictions left the conduct of Epstein and his co-conspirators in the state “unexamined and unpunished.” Final findings and recommendations were deferred while the Commission continued issuing subpoenas, interviewing witnesses and searching for additional survivors and potential perpetrators.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.nmlegis.gov/handouts/HISC%20080526%20Item%201%20Interim%20Report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">NM Survivors' Truth Commission — Interim Report</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73760589</guid><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 15:10:32 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73760589/nmreport4.mp3" length="12071959" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5f2e77bc-c5dd-4d11-bab5-b82f4ab1a9fb/5f2e77bc-c5dd-4d11-bab5-b82f4ab1a9fb.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5f2e77bc-c5dd-4d11-bab5-b82f4ab1a9fb/5f2e77bc-c5dd-4d11-bab5-b82f4ab1a9fb.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5f2e77bc-c5dd-4d11-bab5-b82f4ab1a9fb/5f2e77bc-c5dd-4d11-bab5-b82f4ab1a9fb.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The New Mexico Survivors’ Truth Commission’s 119-page interim report described Zorro Ranch as a major and largely neglected component of Jeffrey Epstein’s broader operation, concluding that authorities failed for years to seriously investigate what...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The New Mexico Survivors’ Truth Commission’s 119-page interim report described Zorro Ranch as a major and largely neglected component of Jeffrey Epstein’s broader operation, concluding that authorities failed for years to seriously investigate what happened there. According to the Commission, Epstein maintained an elaborate, highly controlled compound in New Mexico where survivors reported sexual abuse and where young women were routinely transported, housed and brought into Epstein’s orbit. The report pointed to witness testimony, flight records, seized electronic evidence and FBI material suggesting that Zorro Ranch was integrated into the same system of recruitment, secrecy and exploitation seen at Epstein’s other properties. Among the evidence discussed were computer folders labeled “ZORRO,” discs referencing nude photographs associated with the ranch, accounts of young women arriving by aircraft, efforts to impose restrictive nondisclosure agreements on workers, and survivor statements describing abuse in New Mexico. The Commission stressed that the evidence remained under review and that allegations involving individuals named in the report were not final findings of wrongdoing, but it said the existing record was already sufficient to show that Epstein’s activities in New Mexico deserved far more scrutiny than they ever received.<br /><br />The report was especially critical of institutional failures, saying New Mexico and federal authorities effectively passed responsibility to prosecutors elsewhere while Epstein’s conduct in the state went largely unexamined. It said the U.S. Attorney’s Office for New Mexico and state officials expected the Southern District of New York to handle Epstein, but New York prosecutors concentrated on crimes tied to New York and Florida rather than building a New Mexico case. Zorro Ranch was never searched while Epstein was alive and, according to the report, was not subjected to a comprehensive law-enforcement search until March 2026, nearly seven years after his death. The Commission concluded that this passivity allowed evidence to disappear, memories to fade and potential criminal cases to become more difficult or impossible to prosecute. It also opened separate lines of inquiry into Epstein’s financial dealings, his relationships with scientific institutions and wealthy associates, and the conduct of banks, including subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan. Its clearest interim observation was devastating: Epstein continued exercising wealth and influence after becoming a registered sex offender, operated much of his system in plain sight, and New Mexico law enforcement’s decision to rely on other jurisdictions left the conduct of Epstein and his co-conspirators in the state “unexamined and unpunished.” Final findings and recommendations were deferred while the Commission continued issuing subpoenas, interviewing witnesses and searching for additional survivors and potential perpetrators.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.nmlegis.gov/handouts/HISC%20080526%20Item%201%20Interim%20Report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">NM Survivors' Truth Commission — Interim Report</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>755</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>10 Downing Street Sends Mixed Signals on an Epstein Inquiry (8/10/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/10-downing-street-sends-mixed-signals-on-an-epstein-inquiry-8-10-26--73504508</link><description><![CDATA[Prime Minister Andy Burnham’s government sent mixed messages over whether it was considering a public inquiry into Jeffrey Epstein’s activities in Britain. Victims minister Alex Davies-Jones said Burnham was taking the issue seriously, had agreed to meet Epstein survivors and was examining what action could be taken. Justice minister Jake Richards similarly said no stone should be left unturned and indicated that Burnham would consider the available options. Hours later, however, Downing Street clarified that a public inquiry was not being actively considered, while the Ministry of Justice said the government was only reviewing possible ways to support survivors and address broader systemic failures.<br /><br />The government was also reviewing demands for an inquiry into Mohamed Al Fayed, the former Harrods owner accused by hundreds of women of sexual assault, rape, exploitation and trafficking. Campaigners called for a wider “impunity” inquiry examining how wealthy and powerful men allegedly benefited from institutional protection, potentially covering Epstein, Al Fayed and allegations against West Ham co-owner David Sullivan. Supporters wanted any Epstein inquiry to investigate how he traveled through Britain, including his reported use of military airfields while accompanied by women who may have been trafficked. Former minister Jess Phillips argued that survivors deserved answers about whether parts of the British state had enabled abuse, while Epstein survivor Lisa Phillips said she hoped a meeting with Burnham would lead to accountability, reform and greater protection for future victims.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />sources:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/epstein-burnham-inquiry-mohamed-al-fayed-b3027643.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Andy Burnham insists no plans for Epstein inquiry – hours after two ministers say government is looking into it | The Independent</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73504508</guid><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 12:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73504508/noukpublicepsteininquiry.mp3" length="10300648" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d9e9ca26-c4b1-4da6-bcf3-88ebb581c1b8/d9e9ca26-c4b1-4da6-bcf3-88ebb581c1b8.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d9e9ca26-c4b1-4da6-bcf3-88ebb581c1b8/d9e9ca26-c4b1-4da6-bcf3-88ebb581c1b8.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d9e9ca26-c4b1-4da6-bcf3-88ebb581c1b8/d9e9ca26-c4b1-4da6-bcf3-88ebb581c1b8.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Prime Minister Andy Burnham’s government sent mixed messages over whether it was considering a public inquiry into Jeffrey Epstein’s activities in Britain. Victims minister Alex Davies-Jones said Burnham was taking the issue seriously, had agreed to...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Prime Minister Andy Burnham’s government sent mixed messages over whether it was considering a public inquiry into Jeffrey Epstein’s activities in Britain. Victims minister Alex Davies-Jones said Burnham was taking the issue seriously, had agreed to meet Epstein survivors and was examining what action could be taken. Justice minister Jake Richards similarly said no stone should be left unturned and indicated that Burnham would consider the available options. Hours later, however, Downing Street clarified that a public inquiry was not being actively considered, while the Ministry of Justice said the government was only reviewing possible ways to support survivors and address broader systemic failures.<br /><br />The government was also reviewing demands for an inquiry into Mohamed Al Fayed, the former Harrods owner accused by hundreds of women of sexual assault, rape, exploitation and trafficking. Campaigners called for a wider “impunity” inquiry examining how wealthy and powerful men allegedly benefited from institutional protection, potentially covering Epstein, Al Fayed and allegations against West Ham co-owner David Sullivan. Supporters wanted any Epstein inquiry to investigate how he traveled through Britain, including his reported use of military airfields while accompanied by women who may have been trafficked. Former minister Jess Phillips argued that survivors deserved answers about whether parts of the British state had enabled abuse, while Epstein survivor Lisa Phillips said she hoped a meeting with Burnham would lead to accountability, reform and greater protection for future victims.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />sources:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/epstein-burnham-inquiry-mohamed-al-fayed-b3027643.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Andy Burnham insists no plans for Epstein inquiry – hours after two ministers say government is looking into it | The Independent</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>644</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   Order Denying Kohberger's Motion To Strike The Death Penalty Or Adopt Other Procedures (8/10/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-order-denying-kohberger-s-motion-to-strike-the-death-penalty-or-adopt-other-procedures-8-10-26--73682484</link><description><![CDATA[Judge Steven Hippler denied Bryan Kohberger’s motion to strike the death penalty or impose additional procedures on prosecutors over the way discovery had been produced in the case. Kohberger’s defense argued that the State had overwhelmed the defense with an enormous and poorly organized volume of material, including more than 68 terabytes of data, roughly 13,000 photographs, 15,000 business surveillance clips, thousands of residential videos and information extracted from dozens of digital devices. The defense characterized the production as a massive “data dump” that was difficult to search and review, arguing that prosecutors had failed to provide adequate indexes, logs or specific identification of potentially exculpatory material. Kohberger’s attorneys contended that the situation interfered with their ability to prepare for a capital trial and violated his due-process rights, and they asked Hippler to impose sanctions that included removing the death penalty and requiring prosecutors to provide greater organization and assistance in navigating the discovery<br /><br />Hippler rejected those arguments, finding that the defense had failed to establish either a discovery violation or a constitutional due-process violation by the State. He concluded that prosecutors were required to disclose material evidence favorable to the accused but were not obligated to organize the defense’s case for it, create a particular searchable database or specifically identify every potentially favorable item within a massive discovery production. Hippler also rejected the suggestion that prosecutors had deliberately buried relevant evidence among irrelevant material or made access to the discovery unreasonably difficult, noting that much of the material had been provided because the defense itself had requested broad categories of evidence. He therefore found no justification for the extraordinary sanction of eliminating the death penalty and declined to impose the additional organizational requirements requested by Kohberger’s attorneys. While denying the motion, Hippler encouraged the defense to seek additional personnel or resources if it believed more help was necessary to review the evidence, leaving the responsibility for managing the discovery ultimately with Kohberger’s defense team<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73682484</guid><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 10:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73682484/megahippleradoptprocedures.mp3" length="25143632" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e40ebb0c-6482-4ecf-a8c6-cd37e8caa41a/e40ebb0c-6482-4ecf-a8c6-cd37e8caa41a.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e40ebb0c-6482-4ecf-a8c6-cd37e8caa41a/e40ebb0c-6482-4ecf-a8c6-cd37e8caa41a.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e40ebb0c-6482-4ecf-a8c6-cd37e8caa41a/e40ebb0c-6482-4ecf-a8c6-cd37e8caa41a.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Judge Steven Hippler denied Bryan Kohberger’s motion to strike the death penalty or impose additional procedures on prosecutors over the way discovery had been produced in the case. Kohberger’s defense argued that the State had overwhelmed the defense...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Judge Steven Hippler denied Bryan Kohberger’s motion to strike the death penalty or impose additional procedures on prosecutors over the way discovery had been produced in the case. Kohberger’s defense argued that the State had overwhelmed the defense with an enormous and poorly organized volume of material, including more than 68 terabytes of data, roughly 13,000 photographs, 15,000 business surveillance clips, thousands of residential videos and information extracted from dozens of digital devices. The defense characterized the production as a massive “data dump” that was difficult to search and review, arguing that prosecutors had failed to provide adequate indexes, logs or specific identification of potentially exculpatory material. Kohberger’s attorneys contended that the situation interfered with their ability to prepare for a capital trial and violated his due-process rights, and they asked Hippler to impose sanctions that included removing the death penalty and requiring prosecutors to provide greater organization and assistance in navigating the discovery<br /><br />Hippler rejected those arguments, finding that the defense had failed to establish either a discovery violation or a constitutional due-process violation by the State. He concluded that prosecutors were required to disclose material evidence favorable to the accused but were not obligated to organize the defense’s case for it, create a particular searchable database or specifically identify every potentially favorable item within a massive discovery production. Hippler also rejected the suggestion that prosecutors had deliberately buried relevant evidence among irrelevant material or made access to the discovery unreasonably difficult, noting that much of the material had been provided because the defense itself had requested broad categories of evidence. He therefore found no justification for the extraordinary sanction of eliminating the death penalty and declined to impose the additional organizational requirements requested by Kohberger’s attorneys. While denying the motion, Hippler encouraged the defense to seek additional personnel or resources if it believed more help was necessary to review the evidence, leaving the responsibility for managing the discovery ultimately with Kohberger’s defense team<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1572</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   Bryan Kohberger And The IGG Order (Part 4-5) (8/10/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-the-igg-order-part-4-5-8-10-26--73682369</link><description><![CDATA[In the lead-up to Bryan Kohberger’s trial, the court issued an important order governing investigative genetic genealogy, or IGG, material connected to the identification of Kohberger as a suspect. The dispute centered on the genetic genealogy work investigators used after DNA recovered from the knife sheath at the King Road crime scene did not initially identify a suspect through traditional law-enforcement databases. Kohberger’s defense sought access to the underlying IGG records, arguing that it needed to examine how investigators moved from the unknown DNA profile to Kohberger and whether the process complied with applicable policies, privacy protections, and constitutional requirements. Prosecutors resisted broad disclosure, maintaining that much of the genealogy information involved private individuals who had nothing to do with the case and that the IGG process had functioned primarily as an investigative lead rather than evidence the state intended to present to the jury.<br /><br /><br />The court ultimately required the state to provide the defense with certain IGG-related materials while placing significant restrictions on their use and disclosure. The judge recognized that Kohberger’s attorneys were entitled to investigate the process that had helped focus law enforcement on their client, but also sought to protect the privacy of uninvolved genetic relatives and people whose genealogical information had been examined during the investigation. The order therefore reflected a compromise: the defense gained access to material necessary to evaluate and potentially challenge the genealogy investigation, while sensitive information remained subject to protective measures and limited distribution. The ruling was significant because it gave Kohberger’s lawyers an opportunity to scrutinize one of the most consequential investigative steps in the case, even though prosecutors maintained that the eventual direct DNA comparison between Kohberger and the sheath sample, rather than the genealogy search itself, was the evidence they relied upon to connect him to the crime scene.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73682369</guid><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73682369/megaiggorder4n5.mp3" length="28898995" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1694619a-15f6-4541-b4d4-44d3b5fc349b/1694619a-15f6-4541-b4d4-44d3b5fc349b.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1694619a-15f6-4541-b4d4-44d3b5fc349b/1694619a-15f6-4541-b4d4-44d3b5fc349b.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1694619a-15f6-4541-b4d4-44d3b5fc349b/1694619a-15f6-4541-b4d4-44d3b5fc349b.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In the lead-up to Bryan Kohberger’s trial, the court issued an important order governing investigative genetic genealogy, or IGG, material connected to the identification of Kohberger as a suspect. The dispute centered on the genetic genealogy work...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In the lead-up to Bryan Kohberger’s trial, the court issued an important order governing investigative genetic genealogy, or IGG, material connected to the identification of Kohberger as a suspect. The dispute centered on the genetic genealogy work investigators used after DNA recovered from the knife sheath at the King Road crime scene did not initially identify a suspect through traditional law-enforcement databases. Kohberger’s defense sought access to the underlying IGG records, arguing that it needed to examine how investigators moved from the unknown DNA profile to Kohberger and whether the process complied with applicable policies, privacy protections, and constitutional requirements. Prosecutors resisted broad disclosure, maintaining that much of the genealogy information involved private individuals who had nothing to do with the case and that the IGG process had functioned primarily as an investigative lead rather than evidence the state intended to present to the jury.<br /><br /><br />The court ultimately required the state to provide the defense with certain IGG-related materials while placing significant restrictions on their use and disclosure. The judge recognized that Kohberger’s attorneys were entitled to investigate the process that had helped focus law enforcement on their client, but also sought to protect the privacy of uninvolved genetic relatives and people whose genealogical information had been examined during the investigation. The order therefore reflected a compromise: the defense gained access to material necessary to evaluate and potentially challenge the genealogy investigation, while sensitive information remained subject to protective measures and limited distribution. The ruling was significant because it gave Kohberger’s lawyers an opportunity to scrutinize one of the most consequential investigative steps in the case, even though prosecutors maintained that the eventual direct DNA comparison between Kohberger and the sheath sample, rather than the genealogy search itself, was the evidence they relied upon to connect him to the crime scene.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1807</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   Bryan Kohberger And The IGG Order (Part 1-3) (8/10/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-the-igg-order-part-1-3-8-10-26--73682370</link><description><![CDATA[In the lead-up to Bryan Kohberger’s trial, the court issued an important order governing investigative genetic genealogy, or IGG, material connected to the identification of Kohberger as a suspect. The dispute centered on the genetic genealogy work investigators used after DNA recovered from the knife sheath at the King Road crime scene did not initially identify a suspect through traditional law-enforcement databases. Kohberger’s defense sought access to the underlying IGG records, arguing that it needed to examine how investigators moved from the unknown DNA profile to Kohberger and whether the process complied with applicable policies, privacy protections, and constitutional requirements. Prosecutors resisted broad disclosure, maintaining that much of the genealogy information involved private individuals who had nothing to do with the case and that the IGG process had functioned primarily as an investigative lead rather than evidence the state intended to present to the jury.<br /><br /><br />The court ultimately required the state to provide the defense with certain IGG-related materials while placing significant restrictions on their use and disclosure. The judge recognized that Kohberger’s attorneys were entitled to investigate the process that had helped focus law enforcement on their client, but also sought to protect the privacy of uninvolved genetic relatives and people whose genealogical information had been examined during the investigation. The order therefore reflected a compromise: the defense gained access to material necessary to evaluate and potentially challenge the genealogy investigation, while sensitive information remained subject to protective measures and limited distribution. The ruling was significant because it gave Kohberger’s lawyers an opportunity to scrutinize one of the most consequential investigative steps in the case, even though prosecutors maintained that the eventual direct DNA comparison between Kohberger and the sheath sample, rather than the genealogy search itself, was the evidence they relied upon to connect him to the crime scene.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73682370</guid><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73682370/megaiggorder1n2n3.mp3" length="34425670" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1512e7cd-372a-4483-8b49-bdd842563c2c/1512e7cd-372a-4483-8b49-bdd842563c2c.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1512e7cd-372a-4483-8b49-bdd842563c2c/1512e7cd-372a-4483-8b49-bdd842563c2c.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1512e7cd-372a-4483-8b49-bdd842563c2c/1512e7cd-372a-4483-8b49-bdd842563c2c.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In the lead-up to Bryan Kohberger’s trial, the court issued an important order governing investigative genetic genealogy, or IGG, material connected to the identification of Kohberger as a suspect. The dispute centered on the genetic genealogy work...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In the lead-up to Bryan Kohberger’s trial, the court issued an important order governing investigative genetic genealogy, or IGG, material connected to the identification of Kohberger as a suspect. The dispute centered on the genetic genealogy work investigators used after DNA recovered from the knife sheath at the King Road crime scene did not initially identify a suspect through traditional law-enforcement databases. Kohberger’s defense sought access to the underlying IGG records, arguing that it needed to examine how investigators moved from the unknown DNA profile to Kohberger and whether the process complied with applicable policies, privacy protections, and constitutional requirements. Prosecutors resisted broad disclosure, maintaining that much of the genealogy information involved private individuals who had nothing to do with the case and that the IGG process had functioned primarily as an investigative lead rather than evidence the state intended to present to the jury.<br /><br /><br />The court ultimately required the state to provide the defense with certain IGG-related materials while placing significant restrictions on their use and disclosure. The judge recognized that Kohberger’s attorneys were entitled to investigate the process that had helped focus law enforcement on their client, but also sought to protect the privacy of uninvolved genetic relatives and people whose genealogical information had been examined during the investigation. The order therefore reflected a compromise: the defense gained access to material necessary to evaluate and potentially challenge the genealogy investigation, while sensitive information remained subject to protective measures and limited distribution. The ruling was significant because it gave Kohberger’s lawyers an opportunity to scrutinize one of the most consequential investigative steps in the case, even though prosecutors maintained that the eventual direct DNA comparison between Kohberger and the sheath sample, rather than the genealogy search itself, was the evidence they relied upon to connect him to the crime scene.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2152</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Judge Hippler's Order On Bryan Kohberger's Capital Punishment Motions (Part 5)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/judge-hippler-s-order-on-bryan-kohberger-s-capital-punishment-motions-part-5--73395948</link><description><![CDATA[In State v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, Judge Steven Hippler issued a Memorandum Decision and Order addressing multiple defense motions aimed at removing the death penalty as a sentencing option. The defense presented 12 motions challenging various aspects of Idaho's capital punishment framework, including the constitutionality of execution methods and the applicability of certain aggravating factors. After thorough consideration, Judge Hippler denied all motions, affirming that the death penalty remains a viable sentencing option in this case.<br /><br />The court's 55-page decision systematically addressed each defense argument, referencing precedents set by the Idaho Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court that uphold the constitutionality of capital punishment. Judge Hippler concluded that the defense's claims did not warrant the removal of the death penalty, allowing the prosecution to continue seeking it as a potential sentence. This ruling signifies a pivotal moment in the proceedings, underscoring the court's commitment to adhering to established legal standards in capital cases. <br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/isc.coi/CR01-24-31665/2024/112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73395948</guid><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 04:30:07 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73395948/moscowdeathpenaltyorder5.mp3" length="11485144" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ef7c8cbd-91a7-4f7a-b5ae-abeed3961435/ef7c8cbd-91a7-4f7a-b5ae-abeed3961435.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ef7c8cbd-91a7-4f7a-b5ae-abeed3961435/ef7c8cbd-91a7-4f7a-b5ae-abeed3961435.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ef7c8cbd-91a7-4f7a-b5ae-abeed3961435/ef7c8cbd-91a7-4f7a-b5ae-abeed3961435.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In State v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, Judge Steven Hippler issued a Memorandum Decision and Order addressing multiple defense motions aimed at removing the death penalty as a sentencing option. The defense presented 12 motions...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In State v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, Judge Steven Hippler issued a Memorandum Decision and Order addressing multiple defense motions aimed at removing the death penalty as a sentencing option. The defense presented 12 motions challenging various aspects of Idaho's capital punishment framework, including the constitutionality of execution methods and the applicability of certain aggravating factors. After thorough consideration, Judge Hippler denied all motions, affirming that the death penalty remains a viable sentencing option in this case.<br /><br />The court's 55-page decision systematically addressed each defense argument, referencing precedents set by the Idaho Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court that uphold the constitutionality of capital punishment. Judge Hippler concluded that the defense's claims did not warrant the removal of the death penalty, allowing the prosecution to continue seeking it as a potential sentence. This ruling signifies a pivotal moment in the proceedings, underscoring the court's commitment to adhering to established legal standards in capital cases. <br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/isc.coi/CR01-24-31665/2024/112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>718</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Judge Hippler's Order On Bryan Kohberger's Capital Punishment Motions (Part 4)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/judge-hippler-s-order-on-bryan-kohberger-s-capital-punishment-motions-part-4--73395947</link><description><![CDATA[In State v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, Judge Steven Hippler issued a Memorandum Decision and Order addressing multiple defense motions aimed at removing the death penalty as a sentencing option. The defense presented 12 motions challenging various aspects of Idaho's capital punishment framework, including the constitutionality of execution methods and the applicability of certain aggravating factors. After thorough consideration, Judge Hippler denied all motions, affirming that the death penalty remains a viable sentencing option in this case.<br /><br />The court's 55-page decision systematically addressed each defense argument, referencing precedents set by the Idaho Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court that uphold the constitutionality of capital punishment. Judge Hippler concluded that the defense's claims did not warrant the removal of the death penalty, allowing the prosecution to continue seeking it as a potential sentence. This ruling signifies a pivotal moment in the proceedings, underscoring the court's commitment to adhering to established legal standards in capital cases. <br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/isc.coi/CR01-24-31665/2024/112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73395947</guid><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 02:30:05 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73395947/moscowdeathpenaltyorder4.mp3" length="13610466" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/450f009b-4abb-4857-8705-b91385eacecd/450f009b-4abb-4857-8705-b91385eacecd.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/450f009b-4abb-4857-8705-b91385eacecd/450f009b-4abb-4857-8705-b91385eacecd.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/450f009b-4abb-4857-8705-b91385eacecd/450f009b-4abb-4857-8705-b91385eacecd.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In State v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, Judge Steven Hippler issued a Memorandum Decision and Order addressing multiple defense motions aimed at removing the death penalty as a sentencing option. The defense presented 12 motions...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In State v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, Judge Steven Hippler issued a Memorandum Decision and Order addressing multiple defense motions aimed at removing the death penalty as a sentencing option. The defense presented 12 motions challenging various aspects of Idaho's capital punishment framework, including the constitutionality of execution methods and the applicability of certain aggravating factors. After thorough consideration, Judge Hippler denied all motions, affirming that the death penalty remains a viable sentencing option in this case.<br /><br />The court's 55-page decision systematically addressed each defense argument, referencing precedents set by the Idaho Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court that uphold the constitutionality of capital punishment. Judge Hippler concluded that the defense's claims did not warrant the removal of the death penalty, allowing the prosecution to continue seeking it as a potential sentence. This ruling signifies a pivotal moment in the proceedings, underscoring the court's commitment to adhering to established legal standards in capital cases. <br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/isc.coi/CR01-24-31665/2024/112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>851</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The New Mexico Epstein Commission Interim Report (Part 3) (8/9/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-new-mexico-epstein-commission-interim-report-part-3-8-9-26--73679757</link><description><![CDATA[The New Mexico Survivors’ Truth Commission’s 119-page interim report described Zorro Ranch as a major and largely neglected component of Jeffrey Epstein’s broader operation, concluding that authorities failed for years to seriously investigate what happened there. According to the Commission, Epstein maintained an elaborate, highly controlled compound in New Mexico where survivors reported sexual abuse and where young women were routinely transported, housed and brought into Epstein’s orbit. The report pointed to witness testimony, flight records, seized electronic evidence and FBI material suggesting that Zorro Ranch was integrated into the same system of recruitment, secrecy and exploitation seen at Epstein’s other properties. Among the evidence discussed were computer folders labeled “ZORRO,” discs referencing nude photographs associated with the ranch, accounts of young women arriving by aircraft, efforts to impose restrictive nondisclosure agreements on workers, and survivor statements describing abuse in New Mexico. The Commission stressed that the evidence remained under review and that allegations involving individuals named in the report were not final findings of wrongdoing, but it said the existing record was already sufficient to show that Epstein’s activities in New Mexico deserved far more scrutiny than they ever received.<br /><br />The report was especially critical of institutional failures, saying New Mexico and federal authorities effectively passed responsibility to prosecutors elsewhere while Epstein’s conduct in the state went largely unexamined. It said the U.S. Attorney’s Office for New Mexico and state officials expected the Southern District of New York to handle Epstein, but New York prosecutors concentrated on crimes tied to New York and Florida rather than building a New Mexico case. Zorro Ranch was never searched while Epstein was alive and, according to the report, was not subjected to a comprehensive law-enforcement search until March 2026, nearly seven years after his death. The Commission concluded that this passivity allowed evidence to disappear, memories to fade and potential criminal cases to become more difficult or impossible to prosecute. It also opened separate lines of inquiry into Epstein’s financial dealings, his relationships with scientific institutions and wealthy associates, and the conduct of banks, including subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan. Its clearest interim observation was devastating: Epstein continued exercising wealth and influence after becoming a registered sex offender, operated much of his system in plain sight, and New Mexico law enforcement’s decision to rely on other jurisdictions left the conduct of Epstein and his co-conspirators in the state “unexamined and unpunished.” Final findings and recommendations were deferred while the Commission continued issuing subpoenas, interviewing witnesses and searching for additional survivors and potential perpetrators.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.nmlegis.gov/handouts/HISC%20080526%20Item%201%20Interim%20Report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">NM Survivors' Truth Commission — Interim Report</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73679757</guid><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 00:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73679757/nmreport3.mp3" length="12891159" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/240546ee-2096-4046-9412-cdc1b7955bc9/240546ee-2096-4046-9412-cdc1b7955bc9.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/240546ee-2096-4046-9412-cdc1b7955bc9/240546ee-2096-4046-9412-cdc1b7955bc9.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/240546ee-2096-4046-9412-cdc1b7955bc9/240546ee-2096-4046-9412-cdc1b7955bc9.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The New Mexico Survivors’ Truth Commission’s 119-page interim report described Zorro Ranch as a major and largely neglected component of Jeffrey Epstein’s broader operation, concluding that authorities failed for years to seriously investigate what...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The New Mexico Survivors’ Truth Commission’s 119-page interim report described Zorro Ranch as a major and largely neglected component of Jeffrey Epstein’s broader operation, concluding that authorities failed for years to seriously investigate what happened there. According to the Commission, Epstein maintained an elaborate, highly controlled compound in New Mexico where survivors reported sexual abuse and where young women were routinely transported, housed and brought into Epstein’s orbit. The report pointed to witness testimony, flight records, seized electronic evidence and FBI material suggesting that Zorro Ranch was integrated into the same system of recruitment, secrecy and exploitation seen at Epstein’s other properties. Among the evidence discussed were computer folders labeled “ZORRO,” discs referencing nude photographs associated with the ranch, accounts of young women arriving by aircraft, efforts to impose restrictive nondisclosure agreements on workers, and survivor statements describing abuse in New Mexico. The Commission stressed that the evidence remained under review and that allegations involving individuals named in the report were not final findings of wrongdoing, but it said the existing record was already sufficient to show that Epstein’s activities in New Mexico deserved far more scrutiny than they ever received.<br /><br />The report was especially critical of institutional failures, saying New Mexico and federal authorities effectively passed responsibility to prosecutors elsewhere while Epstein’s conduct in the state went largely unexamined. It said the U.S. Attorney’s Office for New Mexico and state officials expected the Southern District of New York to handle Epstein, but New York prosecutors concentrated on crimes tied to New York and Florida rather than building a New Mexico case. Zorro Ranch was never searched while Epstein was alive and, according to the report, was not subjected to a comprehensive law-enforcement search until March 2026, nearly seven years after his death. The Commission concluded that this passivity allowed evidence to disappear, memories to fade and potential criminal cases to become more difficult or impossible to prosecute. It also opened separate lines of inquiry into Epstein’s financial dealings, his relationships with scientific institutions and wealthy associates, and the conduct of banks, including subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan. Its clearest interim observation was devastating: Epstein continued exercising wealth and influence after becoming a registered sex offender, operated much of his system in plain sight, and New Mexico law enforcement’s decision to rely on other jurisdictions left the conduct of Epstein and his co-conspirators in the state “unexamined and unpunished.” Final findings and recommendations were deferred while the Commission continued issuing subpoenas, interviewing witnesses and searching for additional survivors and potential perpetrators.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.nmlegis.gov/handouts/HISC%20080526%20Item%201%20Interim%20Report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">NM Survivors' Truth Commission — Interim Report</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>806</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The New Mexico Epstein Commission Interim Report (Part 2) (8/9/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-new-mexico-epstein-commission-interim-report-part-2-8-9-26--73679759</link><description><![CDATA[The New Mexico Survivors’ Truth Commission’s 119-page interim report described Zorro Ranch as a major and largely neglected component of Jeffrey Epstein’s broader operation, concluding that authorities failed for years to seriously investigate what happened there. According to the Commission, Epstein maintained an elaborate, highly controlled compound in New Mexico where survivors reported sexual abuse and where young women were routinely transported, housed and brought into Epstein’s orbit. The report pointed to witness testimony, flight records, seized electronic evidence and FBI material suggesting that Zorro Ranch was integrated into the same system of recruitment, secrecy and exploitation seen at Epstein’s other properties. Among the evidence discussed were computer folders labeled “ZORRO,” discs referencing nude photographs associated with the ranch, accounts of young women arriving by aircraft, efforts to impose restrictive nondisclosure agreements on workers, and survivor statements describing abuse in New Mexico. The Commission stressed that the evidence remained under review and that allegations involving individuals named in the report were not final findings of wrongdoing, but it said the existing record was already sufficient to show that Epstein’s activities in New Mexico deserved far more scrutiny than they ever received.<br /><br />The report was especially critical of institutional failures, saying New Mexico and federal authorities effectively passed responsibility to prosecutors elsewhere while Epstein’s conduct in the state went largely unexamined. It said the U.S. Attorney’s Office for New Mexico and state officials expected the Southern District of New York to handle Epstein, but New York prosecutors concentrated on crimes tied to New York and Florida rather than building a New Mexico case. Zorro Ranch was never searched while Epstein was alive and, according to the report, was not subjected to a comprehensive law-enforcement search until March 2026, nearly seven years after his death. The Commission concluded that this passivity allowed evidence to disappear, memories to fade and potential criminal cases to become more difficult or impossible to prosecute. It also opened separate lines of inquiry into Epstein’s financial dealings, his relationships with scientific institutions and wealthy associates, and the conduct of banks, including subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan. Its clearest interim observation was devastating: Epstein continued exercising wealth and influence after becoming a registered sex offender, operated much of his system in plain sight, and New Mexico law enforcement’s decision to rely on other jurisdictions left the conduct of Epstein and his co-conspirators in the state “unexamined and unpunished.” Final findings and recommendations were deferred while the Commission continued issuing subpoenas, interviewing witnesses and searching for additional survivors and potential perpetrators.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.nmlegis.gov/handouts/HISC%20080526%20Item%201%20Interim%20Report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">NM Survivors' Truth Commission — Interim Report</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73679759</guid><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73679759/nmreport2.mp3" length="12291387" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4cc1b496-3091-4a35-a111-90236a85cfe4/4cc1b496-3091-4a35-a111-90236a85cfe4.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4cc1b496-3091-4a35-a111-90236a85cfe4/4cc1b496-3091-4a35-a111-90236a85cfe4.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4cc1b496-3091-4a35-a111-90236a85cfe4/4cc1b496-3091-4a35-a111-90236a85cfe4.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The New Mexico Survivors’ Truth Commission’s 119-page interim report described Zorro Ranch as a major and largely neglected component of Jeffrey Epstein’s broader operation, concluding that authorities failed for years to seriously investigate what...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The New Mexico Survivors’ Truth Commission’s 119-page interim report described Zorro Ranch as a major and largely neglected component of Jeffrey Epstein’s broader operation, concluding that authorities failed for years to seriously investigate what happened there. According to the Commission, Epstein maintained an elaborate, highly controlled compound in New Mexico where survivors reported sexual abuse and where young women were routinely transported, housed and brought into Epstein’s orbit. The report pointed to witness testimony, flight records, seized electronic evidence and FBI material suggesting that Zorro Ranch was integrated into the same system of recruitment, secrecy and exploitation seen at Epstein’s other properties. Among the evidence discussed were computer folders labeled “ZORRO,” discs referencing nude photographs associated with the ranch, accounts of young women arriving by aircraft, efforts to impose restrictive nondisclosure agreements on workers, and survivor statements describing abuse in New Mexico. The Commission stressed that the evidence remained under review and that allegations involving individuals named in the report were not final findings of wrongdoing, but it said the existing record was already sufficient to show that Epstein’s activities in New Mexico deserved far more scrutiny than they ever received.<br /><br />The report was especially critical of institutional failures, saying New Mexico and federal authorities effectively passed responsibility to prosecutors elsewhere while Epstein’s conduct in the state went largely unexamined. It said the U.S. Attorney’s Office for New Mexico and state officials expected the Southern District of New York to handle Epstein, but New York prosecutors concentrated on crimes tied to New York and Florida rather than building a New Mexico case. Zorro Ranch was never searched while Epstein was alive and, according to the report, was not subjected to a comprehensive law-enforcement search until March 2026, nearly seven years after his death. The Commission concluded that this passivity allowed evidence to disappear, memories to fade and potential criminal cases to become more difficult or impossible to prosecute. It also opened separate lines of inquiry into Epstein’s financial dealings, his relationships with scientific institutions and wealthy associates, and the conduct of banks, including subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan. Its clearest interim observation was devastating: Epstein continued exercising wealth and influence after becoming a registered sex offender, operated much of his system in plain sight, and New Mexico law enforcement’s decision to rely on other jurisdictions left the conduct of Epstein and his co-conspirators in the state “unexamined and unpunished.” Final findings and recommendations were deferred while the Commission continued issuing subpoenas, interviewing witnesses and searching for additional survivors and potential perpetrators.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.nmlegis.gov/handouts/HISC%20080526%20Item%201%20Interim%20Report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">NM Survivors' Truth Commission — Interim Report</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>769</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The New Mexico Epstein Commission Interim Report (Part 1) (8/9/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-new-mexico-epstein-commission-interim-report-part-1-8-9-26--73679760</link><description><![CDATA[The New Mexico Survivors’ Truth Commission’s 119-page interim report described Zorro Ranch as a major and largely neglected component of Jeffrey Epstein’s broader operation, concluding that authorities failed for years to seriously investigate what happened there. According to the Commission, Epstein maintained an elaborate, highly controlled compound in New Mexico where survivors reported sexual abuse and where young women were routinely transported, housed and brought into Epstein’s orbit. The report pointed to witness testimony, flight records, seized electronic evidence and FBI material suggesting that Zorro Ranch was integrated into the same system of recruitment, secrecy and exploitation seen at Epstein’s other properties. Among the evidence discussed were computer folders labeled “ZORRO,” discs referencing nude photographs associated with the ranch, accounts of young women arriving by aircraft, efforts to impose restrictive nondisclosure agreements on workers, and survivor statements describing abuse in New Mexico. The Commission stressed that the evidence remained under review and that allegations involving individuals named in the report were not final findings of wrongdoing, but it said the existing record was already sufficient to show that Epstein’s activities in New Mexico deserved far more scrutiny than they ever received.<br /><br />The report was especially critical of institutional failures, saying New Mexico and federal authorities effectively passed responsibility to prosecutors elsewhere while Epstein’s conduct in the state went largely unexamined. It said the U.S. Attorney’s Office for New Mexico and state officials expected the Southern District of New York to handle Epstein, but New York prosecutors concentrated on crimes tied to New York and Florida rather than building a New Mexico case. Zorro Ranch was never searched while Epstein was alive and, according to the report, was not subjected to a comprehensive law-enforcement search until March 2026, nearly seven years after his death. The Commission concluded that this passivity allowed evidence to disappear, memories to fade and potential criminal cases to become more difficult or impossible to prosecute. It also opened separate lines of inquiry into Epstein’s financial dealings, his relationships with scientific institutions and wealthy associates, and the conduct of banks, including subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan. Its clearest interim observation was devastating: Epstein continued exercising wealth and influence after becoming a registered sex offender, operated much of his system in plain sight, and New Mexico law enforcement’s decision to rely on other jurisdictions left the conduct of Epstein and his co-conspirators in the state “unexamined and unpunished.” Final findings and recommendations were deferred while the Commission continued issuing subpoenas, interviewing witnesses and searching for additional survivors and potential perpetrators.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.nmlegis.gov/handouts/HISC%20080526%20Item%201%20Interim%20Report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">NM Survivors' Truth Commission — Interim Report</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73679760</guid><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 20:30:06 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73679760/nmreport1.mp3" length="13001082" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e463b885-1086-415c-ac13-877d8cd32fc5/e463b885-1086-415c-ac13-877d8cd32fc5.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e463b885-1086-415c-ac13-877d8cd32fc5/e463b885-1086-415c-ac13-877d8cd32fc5.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e463b885-1086-415c-ac13-877d8cd32fc5/e463b885-1086-415c-ac13-877d8cd32fc5.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The New Mexico Survivors’ Truth Commission’s 119-page interim report described Zorro Ranch as a major and largely neglected component of Jeffrey Epstein’s broader operation, concluding that authorities failed for years to seriously investigate what...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The New Mexico Survivors’ Truth Commission’s 119-page interim report described Zorro Ranch as a major and largely neglected component of Jeffrey Epstein’s broader operation, concluding that authorities failed for years to seriously investigate what happened there. According to the Commission, Epstein maintained an elaborate, highly controlled compound in New Mexico where survivors reported sexual abuse and where young women were routinely transported, housed and brought into Epstein’s orbit. The report pointed to witness testimony, flight records, seized electronic evidence and FBI material suggesting that Zorro Ranch was integrated into the same system of recruitment, secrecy and exploitation seen at Epstein’s other properties. Among the evidence discussed were computer folders labeled “ZORRO,” discs referencing nude photographs associated with the ranch, accounts of young women arriving by aircraft, efforts to impose restrictive nondisclosure agreements on workers, and survivor statements describing abuse in New Mexico. The Commission stressed that the evidence remained under review and that allegations involving individuals named in the report were not final findings of wrongdoing, but it said the existing record was already sufficient to show that Epstein’s activities in New Mexico deserved far more scrutiny than they ever received.<br /><br />The report was especially critical of institutional failures, saying New Mexico and federal authorities effectively passed responsibility to prosecutors elsewhere while Epstein’s conduct in the state went largely unexamined. It said the U.S. Attorney’s Office for New Mexico and state officials expected the Southern District of New York to handle Epstein, but New York prosecutors concentrated on crimes tied to New York and Florida rather than building a New Mexico case. Zorro Ranch was never searched while Epstein was alive and, according to the report, was not subjected to a comprehensive law-enforcement search until March 2026, nearly seven years after his death. The Commission concluded that this passivity allowed evidence to disappear, memories to fade and potential criminal cases to become more difficult or impossible to prosecute. It also opened separate lines of inquiry into Epstein’s financial dealings, his relationships with scientific institutions and wealthy associates, and the conduct of banks, including subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan. Its clearest interim observation was devastating: Epstein continued exercising wealth and influence after becoming a registered sex offender, operated much of his system in plain sight, and New Mexico law enforcement’s decision to rely on other jurisdictions left the conduct of Epstein and his co-conspirators in the state “unexamined and unpunished.” Final findings and recommendations were deferred while the Commission continued issuing subpoenas, interviewing witnesses and searching for additional survivors and potential perpetrators.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.nmlegis.gov/handouts/HISC%20080526%20Item%201%20Interim%20Report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">NM Survivors' Truth Commission — Interim Report</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>813</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The First Findings From New Mexico’s Epstein Truth Commission (8/9/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-first-findings-from-new-mexico-s-epstein-truth-commission-8-9-26--73679758</link><description><![CDATA[New Mexico’s legislative “truth commission” investigating Jeffrey Epstein’s activities in the state released its initial 119-page report, concluding that authorities had failed for years to adequately investigate what occurred at Epstein’s Zorro Ranch near Santa Fe. The commission said federal investigators had concentrated primarily on Epstein’s crimes in New York, Florida and the U.S. Virgin Islands while allegations involving New Mexico were largely left unexplored. The report also criticized state and local authorities for relying on federal agencies rather than aggressively investigating potential crimes within New Mexico themselves. Lawmakers said the commission’s work was intended to determine not only what happened at the ranch, but whether failures, negligence or possible public corruption allowed Epstein to operate there with little scrutiny for decades.<br /><br /><br />The initial report did not appear to unveil a large body of previously unknown evidence, instead assembling information from public records, prior reporting, released Epstein documents and survivor accounts as the commission continued its investigation. Among the testimony considered was that of survivor Rachel Benavidez, who alleged that Epstein abused her at Zorro Ranch in the late 1990s. The commission’s release came as New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez was separately pursuing a reopened criminal investigation and suing the Justice Department for records he said federal officials had refused to provide. Together, the legislative inquiry and the attorney general’s investigation represented a renewed effort to examine Epstein’s New Mexico operation, identify who may have participated or enabled it, and determine why meaningful scrutiny of Zorro Ranch had taken so long.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.santafenewmexican.com/news/epstein/new-mexicos-legislative-truth-commission-on-epstein-releases-initial-report/article_03a0957f-dc80-445f-848f-61984afec257.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">New Mexico's legislative truth commission on Epstein releases initial report | News | santafenewmexican.com</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73679758</guid><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 18:30:08 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73679758/nmtruthcomissioninitialreport.mp3" length="14167606" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/41b70370-4f05-44c9-9edd-84a5a7df3b6e/41b70370-4f05-44c9-9edd-84a5a7df3b6e.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/41b70370-4f05-44c9-9edd-84a5a7df3b6e/41b70370-4f05-44c9-9edd-84a5a7df3b6e.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/41b70370-4f05-44c9-9edd-84a5a7df3b6e/41b70370-4f05-44c9-9edd-84a5a7df3b6e.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>New Mexico’s legislative “truth commission” investigating Jeffrey Epstein’s activities in the state released its initial 119-page report, concluding that authorities had failed for years to adequately investigate what occurred at Epstein’s Zorro Ranch...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[New Mexico’s legislative “truth commission” investigating Jeffrey Epstein’s activities in the state released its initial 119-page report, concluding that authorities had failed for years to adequately investigate what occurred at Epstein’s Zorro Ranch near Santa Fe. The commission said federal investigators had concentrated primarily on Epstein’s crimes in New York, Florida and the U.S. Virgin Islands while allegations involving New Mexico were largely left unexplored. The report also criticized state and local authorities for relying on federal agencies rather than aggressively investigating potential crimes within New Mexico themselves. Lawmakers said the commission’s work was intended to determine not only what happened at the ranch, but whether failures, negligence or possible public corruption allowed Epstein to operate there with little scrutiny for decades.<br /><br /><br />The initial report did not appear to unveil a large body of previously unknown evidence, instead assembling information from public records, prior reporting, released Epstein documents and survivor accounts as the commission continued its investigation. Among the testimony considered was that of survivor Rachel Benavidez, who alleged that Epstein abused her at Zorro Ranch in the late 1990s. The commission’s release came as New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez was separately pursuing a reopened criminal investigation and suing the Justice Department for records he said federal officials had refused to provide. Together, the legislative inquiry and the attorney general’s investigation represented a renewed effort to examine Epstein’s New Mexico operation, identify who may have participated or enabled it, and determine why meaningful scrutiny of Zorro Ranch had taken so long.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.santafenewmexican.com/news/epstein/new-mexicos-legislative-truth-commission-on-epstein-releases-initial-report/article_03a0957f-dc80-445f-848f-61984afec257.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">New Mexico's legislative truth commission on Epstein releases initial report | News | santafenewmexican.com</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>886</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Murder In Moscow:   The Long Legal Road Behind Kohberger’s Latest Filing (Part 5) (8/9/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-the-long-legal-road-behind-kohberger-s-latest-filing-part-5-8-9-26--73715368</link><description><![CDATA[Bryan Kohberger pleaded guilty in July 2025 to murdering University of Idaho students Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin, avoiding the death penalty in exchange for four consecutive life sentences without parole. The agreement ended years of litigation over DNA found on a knife sheath, surveillance footage of a white Hyundai Elantra, cellphone records, witness testimony, genetic genealogy, and other evidence prosecutors said connected him to the King Road residence. During the plea hearing, Kohberger told the court that he understood the charges, was satisfied with his attorneys, was acting voluntarily, and was pleading guilty because he was guilty. The deal spared the victims’ families from a lengthy capital trial, but it did not answer the lingering questions about motive, the missing murder weapon, or why the four students were targeted.<br /><br />Kohberger is now seeking post-conviction relief and asking the court to allow him to withdraw those guilty pleas. He claims his former attorneys pressured him into falsely confessing, misled him about death-row and prison conditions, provided ineffective representation, and failed to properly disclose or explain potentially exculpatory evidence. His newly appointed attorney, Greg Rauch, is reviewing those allegations, while Idaho prosecutors are defending the convictions and emphasizing Kohberger’s sworn courtroom admissions and the substantial evidence against him. The court has not ruled that his claims are credible, and Kohberger must meet the demanding post-sentencing standard of proving a manifest injustice. Even if he succeeds, he would not be released automatically, because the murder charges could return, the case could proceed to trial, and prosecutors might seek to restore the death penalty.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73715368</guid><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 16:30:57 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73715368/kohbergerstatus5.mp3" length="14341477" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/33e20a5f-f38b-4ad0-8030-4522e68b972c/33e20a5f-f38b-4ad0-8030-4522e68b972c.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/33e20a5f-f38b-4ad0-8030-4522e68b972c/33e20a5f-f38b-4ad0-8030-4522e68b972c.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/33e20a5f-f38b-4ad0-8030-4522e68b972c/33e20a5f-f38b-4ad0-8030-4522e68b972c.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Bryan Kohberger pleaded guilty in July 2025 to murdering University of Idaho students Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin, avoiding the death penalty in exchange for four consecutive life sentences without parole. The...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Bryan Kohberger pleaded guilty in July 2025 to murdering University of Idaho students Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin, avoiding the death penalty in exchange for four consecutive life sentences without parole. The agreement ended years of litigation over DNA found on a knife sheath, surveillance footage of a white Hyundai Elantra, cellphone records, witness testimony, genetic genealogy, and other evidence prosecutors said connected him to the King Road residence. During the plea hearing, Kohberger told the court that he understood the charges, was satisfied with his attorneys, was acting voluntarily, and was pleading guilty because he was guilty. The deal spared the victims’ families from a lengthy capital trial, but it did not answer the lingering questions about motive, the missing murder weapon, or why the four students were targeted.<br /><br />Kohberger is now seeking post-conviction relief and asking the court to allow him to withdraw those guilty pleas. He claims his former attorneys pressured him into falsely confessing, misled him about death-row and prison conditions, provided ineffective representation, and failed to properly disclose or explain potentially exculpatory evidence. His newly appointed attorney, Greg Rauch, is reviewing those allegations, while Idaho prosecutors are defending the convictions and emphasizing Kohberger’s sworn courtroom admissions and the substantial evidence against him. The court has not ruled that his claims are credible, and Kohberger must meet the demanding post-sentencing standard of proving a manifest injustice. Even if he succeeds, he would not be released automatically, because the murder charges could return, the case could proceed to trial, and prosecutors might seek to restore the death penalty.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>897</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Bryan Kohberger And The Trial That Never Came (Part 4-6) (8/9/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-the-trial-that-never-came-part-4-6-8-9-26--73675896</link><description><![CDATA[In the early hours of November 13, 2022, four University of Idaho students—Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin—were brutally stabbed to death in a rental house near campus in Moscow, Idaho. The crime scene was particularly disturbing: there were no signs of forced entry, and two surviving roommates were left unharmed in the same house. The case immediately drew national attention due to the shocking nature of the murders and the lack of suspects in the early days. A months-long investigation led law enforcement to Bryan Christopher Kohberger, a 28-year-old Ph.D. criminology student at Washington State University, located about ten miles from the crime scene. Using cell phone data, surveillance footage, and a DNA match from a knife sheath found at the scene, police arrested Kohberger in Pennsylvania on December 30, 2022, and later extradited him to Idaho to face four counts of first-degree murder and one count of felony burglary.<br /><br />As of April 2025, Kohberger’s case is still moving through the pretrial phase. His defense has pursued multiple motions challenging evidence collection, including arguments over cellphone pings, surveillance footage, and the genealogical tracing used to identify him as a suspect. The trial has faced delays due to defense requests for more time and the complexities of handling large volumes of digital and forensic evidence. Prosecutors are seeking the death penalty, emphasizing the heinous nature of the crime and the calculated planning involved. Judge John Judge continues to rule on motions in limine, including what evidence will be allowed at trial. The case remains one of the most closely watched in the nation, with both legal teams preparing for what is expected to be a high-profile and emotionally charged trial, now tentatively slated to begin later in 2025.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73675896</guid><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 14:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73675896/megakohbergerandthetrialthatnevercame4n5n6.mp3" length="32468367" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/dd163d24-88ac-4da2-85ed-af031197d06d/dd163d24-88ac-4da2-85ed-af031197d06d.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/dd163d24-88ac-4da2-85ed-af031197d06d/dd163d24-88ac-4da2-85ed-af031197d06d.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/dd163d24-88ac-4da2-85ed-af031197d06d/dd163d24-88ac-4da2-85ed-af031197d06d.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In the early hours of November 13, 2022, four University of Idaho students—Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin—were brutally stabbed to death in a rental house near campus in Moscow, Idaho. The crime scene was particularly...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In the early hours of November 13, 2022, four University of Idaho students—Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin—were brutally stabbed to death in a rental house near campus in Moscow, Idaho. The crime scene was particularly disturbing: there were no signs of forced entry, and two surviving roommates were left unharmed in the same house. The case immediately drew national attention due to the shocking nature of the murders and the lack of suspects in the early days. A months-long investigation led law enforcement to Bryan Christopher Kohberger, a 28-year-old Ph.D. criminology student at Washington State University, located about ten miles from the crime scene. Using cell phone data, surveillance footage, and a DNA match from a knife sheath found at the scene, police arrested Kohberger in Pennsylvania on December 30, 2022, and later extradited him to Idaho to face four counts of first-degree murder and one count of felony burglary.<br /><br />As of April 2025, Kohberger’s case is still moving through the pretrial phase. His defense has pursued multiple motions challenging evidence collection, including arguments over cellphone pings, surveillance footage, and the genealogical tracing used to identify him as a suspect. The trial has faced delays due to defense requests for more time and the complexities of handling large volumes of digital and forensic evidence. Prosecutors are seeking the death penalty, emphasizing the heinous nature of the crime and the calculated planning involved. Judge John Judge continues to rule on motions in limine, including what evidence will be allowed at trial. The case remains one of the most closely watched in the nation, with both legal teams preparing for what is expected to be a high-profile and emotionally charged trial, now tentatively slated to begin later in 2025.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2030</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Bryan Kohberger And The Trial That Never Came (Part 1-3) (8/9/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-the-trial-that-never-came-part-1-3-8-9-26--73675525</link><description><![CDATA[In the early hours of November 13, 2022, four University of Idaho students—Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin—were brutally stabbed to death in a rental house near campus in Moscow, Idaho. The crime scene was particularly disturbing: there were no signs of forced entry, and two surviving roommates were left unharmed in the same house. The case immediately drew national attention due to the shocking nature of the murders and the lack of suspects in the early days. A months-long investigation led law enforcement to Bryan Christopher Kohberger, a 28-year-old Ph.D. criminology student at Washington State University, located about ten miles from the crime scene. Using cell phone data, surveillance footage, and a DNA match from a knife sheath found at the scene, police arrested Kohberger in Pennsylvania on December 30, 2022, and later extradited him to Idaho to face four counts of first-degree murder and one count of felony burglary.<br /><br />As of April 2025, Kohberger’s case is still moving through the pretrial phase. His defense has pursued multiple motions challenging evidence collection, including arguments over cellphone pings, surveillance footage, and the genealogical tracing used to identify him as a suspect. The trial has faced delays due to defense requests for more time and the complexities of handling large volumes of digital and forensic evidence. Prosecutors are seeking the death penalty, emphasizing the heinous nature of the crime and the calculated planning involved. Judge John Judge continues to rule on motions in limine, including what evidence will be allowed at trial. The case remains one of the most closely watched in the nation, with both legal teams preparing for what is expected to be a high-profile and emotionally charged trial, now tentatively slated to begin later in 2025.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73675525</guid><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 12:30:05 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73675525/megakohbergerroadtrialnevercame1n2n3.mp3" length="36123420" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6c411f2a-a38c-4084-941c-a3138316c996/6c411f2a-a38c-4084-941c-a3138316c996.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6c411f2a-a38c-4084-941c-a3138316c996/6c411f2a-a38c-4084-941c-a3138316c996.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6c411f2a-a38c-4084-941c-a3138316c996/6c411f2a-a38c-4084-941c-a3138316c996.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In the early hours of November 13, 2022, four University of Idaho students—Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin—were brutally stabbed to death in a rental house near campus in Moscow, Idaho. The crime scene was particularly...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In the early hours of November 13, 2022, four University of Idaho students—Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin—were brutally stabbed to death in a rental house near campus in Moscow, Idaho. The crime scene was particularly disturbing: there were no signs of forced entry, and two surviving roommates were left unharmed in the same house. The case immediately drew national attention due to the shocking nature of the murders and the lack of suspects in the early days. A months-long investigation led law enforcement to Bryan Christopher Kohberger, a 28-year-old Ph.D. criminology student at Washington State University, located about ten miles from the crime scene. Using cell phone data, surveillance footage, and a DNA match from a knife sheath found at the scene, police arrested Kohberger in Pennsylvania on December 30, 2022, and later extradited him to Idaho to face four counts of first-degree murder and one count of felony burglary.<br /><br />As of April 2025, Kohberger’s case is still moving through the pretrial phase. His defense has pursued multiple motions challenging evidence collection, including arguments over cellphone pings, surveillance footage, and the genealogical tracing used to identify him as a suspect. The trial has faced delays due to defense requests for more time and the complexities of handling large volumes of digital and forensic evidence. Prosecutors are seeking the death penalty, emphasizing the heinous nature of the crime and the calculated planning involved. Judge John Judge continues to rule on motions in limine, including what evidence will be allowed at trial. The case remains one of the most closely watched in the nation, with both legal teams preparing for what is expected to be a high-profile and emotionally charged trial, now tentatively slated to begin later in 2025.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2258</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Bryan Kohberger And The Arrest Affidavit (8/9/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-the-arrest-affidavit-8-9-26--73675827</link><description><![CDATA[The probable cause affidavit filed after Bryan Kohberger’s arrest laid out the prosecution’s initial theory connecting him to the November 2022 murders of University of Idaho students Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin. Investigators described surveillance footage showing a white Hyundai Elantra repeatedly circling the King Road residence before the killings and then leaving the area at high speed. Police later connected a similar vehicle to Kohberger, who was a doctoral student at Washington State University in nearby Pullman. The affidavit also relied heavily on cellphone records, which investigators said placed Kohberger’s phone near the victims’ neighborhood on numerous occasions before the murders and showed the phone going offline during the critical period surrounding the killings. Investigators further alleged that his phone later reconnected to the network south of Moscow and traveled back toward Pullman, while surveillance cameras captured a vehicle consistent with his Elantra moving along a similar route.<br /><br />The most significant piece of evidence described in the affidavit was a tan leather knife sheath found on the bed next to Madison Mogen’s body. Investigators said DNA recovered from the sheath’s button snap was later compared with DNA obtained from trash collected outside Kohberger’s family home in Pennsylvania, producing a familial match that strongly pointed toward Kohberger’s father and, by extension, Kohberger. The affidavit also included the account of surviving roommate Dylan Mortensen, who told investigators that she had awakened during the night, heard noises inside the house, and eventually saw a masked man dressed in black walking past her toward the rear sliding door. She described the man as approximately 5-foot-10 or taller, not very muscular, with bushy eyebrows, a description investigators believed was consistent with Kohberger. Taken together, the vehicle evidence, cellphone data, eyewitness account, and DNA from the knife sheath were presented as establishing probable cause to arrest Kohberger and charge him with four counts of first-degree murder and one count of burglary.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73675827</guid><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 10:30:05 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73675827/megakohbergerarrestaffidavit.mp3" length="47080220" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7575bd58-de99-461d-81f2-29f58593f6e0/7575bd58-de99-461d-81f2-29f58593f6e0.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7575bd58-de99-461d-81f2-29f58593f6e0/7575bd58-de99-461d-81f2-29f58593f6e0.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7575bd58-de99-461d-81f2-29f58593f6e0/7575bd58-de99-461d-81f2-29f58593f6e0.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The probable cause affidavit filed after Bryan Kohberger’s arrest laid out the prosecution’s initial theory connecting him to the November 2022 murders of University of Idaho students Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The probable cause affidavit filed after Bryan Kohberger’s arrest laid out the prosecution’s initial theory connecting him to the November 2022 murders of University of Idaho students Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin. Investigators described surveillance footage showing a white Hyundai Elantra repeatedly circling the King Road residence before the killings and then leaving the area at high speed. Police later connected a similar vehicle to Kohberger, who was a doctoral student at Washington State University in nearby Pullman. The affidavit also relied heavily on cellphone records, which investigators said placed Kohberger’s phone near the victims’ neighborhood on numerous occasions before the murders and showed the phone going offline during the critical period surrounding the killings. Investigators further alleged that his phone later reconnected to the network south of Moscow and traveled back toward Pullman, while surveillance cameras captured a vehicle consistent with his Elantra moving along a similar route.<br /><br />The most significant piece of evidence described in the affidavit was a tan leather knife sheath found on the bed next to Madison Mogen’s body. Investigators said DNA recovered from the sheath’s button snap was later compared with DNA obtained from trash collected outside Kohberger’s family home in Pennsylvania, producing a familial match that strongly pointed toward Kohberger’s father and, by extension, Kohberger. The affidavit also included the account of surviving roommate Dylan Mortensen, who told investigators that she had awakened during the night, heard noises inside the house, and eventually saw a masked man dressed in black walking past her toward the rear sliding door. She described the man as approximately 5-foot-10 or taller, not very muscular, with bushy eyebrows, a description investigators believed was consistent with Kohberger. Taken together, the vehicle evidence, cellphone data, eyewitness account, and DNA from the knife sheath were presented as establishing probable cause to arrest Kohberger and charge him with four counts of first-degree murder and one count of burglary.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2943</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Bryan Kohberger And The Battle Over Cameras In The Courtroom (8/9/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-the-battle-over-cameras-in-the-courtroom-8-9-26--73675526</link><description><![CDATA[Bryan Kohberger’s defense asked the court to remove cameras from the courtroom, arguing that the intense media coverage surrounding the Idaho murders threatened his right to a fair trial. His attorneys contended that photographers and video cameras had repeatedly focused on Kohberger in ways that turned routine court appearances into highly publicized spectacles, potentially influencing prospective jurors and reinforcing the image of him as the presumed killer before a jury had heard the evidence. The defense argued that continued camera access risked undermining the presumption of innocence and asked the judge to either prohibit cameras altogether or impose much tighter restrictions on how Kohberger could be filmed during proceedings.<br /><br />Judge John Judge denied the request to completely remove cameras, concluding that the defense had not shown that courtroom coverage itself had created the level of prejudice necessary to justify excluding the media. He instead imposed stricter rules governing camera use, including limitations designed to prevent excessive close-ups and other intrusive coverage of Kohberger. The ruling attempted to balance Kohberger’s constitutional right to a fair trial with the public and media’s interest in observing an extraordinarily high-profile criminal case. For the defense, however, the decision meant that cameras would remain present even as Kohberger’s attorneys continued to argue that the relentless national attention surrounding the case could make it increasingly difficult to find an impartial jury.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73675526</guid><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 08:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73675526/megakohbergercameraincourtroommotionjudgeorder.mp3" length="33236576" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2caa0eec-93d6-407f-abfb-74db7fdbc104/2caa0eec-93d6-407f-abfb-74db7fdbc104.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2caa0eec-93d6-407f-abfb-74db7fdbc104/2caa0eec-93d6-407f-abfb-74db7fdbc104.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2caa0eec-93d6-407f-abfb-74db7fdbc104/2caa0eec-93d6-407f-abfb-74db7fdbc104.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Bryan Kohberger’s defense asked the court to remove cameras from the courtroom, arguing that the intense media coverage surrounding the Idaho murders threatened his right to a fair trial. His attorneys contended that photographers and video cameras...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Bryan Kohberger’s defense asked the court to remove cameras from the courtroom, arguing that the intense media coverage surrounding the Idaho murders threatened his right to a fair trial. His attorneys contended that photographers and video cameras had repeatedly focused on Kohberger in ways that turned routine court appearances into highly publicized spectacles, potentially influencing prospective jurors and reinforcing the image of him as the presumed killer before a jury had heard the evidence. The defense argued that continued camera access risked undermining the presumption of innocence and asked the judge to either prohibit cameras altogether or impose much tighter restrictions on how Kohberger could be filmed during proceedings.<br /><br />Judge John Judge denied the request to completely remove cameras, concluding that the defense had not shown that courtroom coverage itself had created the level of prejudice necessary to justify excluding the media. He instead imposed stricter rules governing camera use, including limitations designed to prevent excessive close-ups and other intrusive coverage of Kohberger. The ruling attempted to balance Kohberger’s constitutional right to a fair trial with the public and media’s interest in observing an extraordinarily high-profile criminal case. For the defense, however, the decision meant that cameras would remain present even as Kohberger’s attorneys continued to argue that the relentless national attention surrounding the case could make it increasingly difficult to find an impartial jury.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2078</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Bryan Kohberger And The Motion To Dismiss (8/8/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-the-motion-to-dismiss-8-8-26--73675524</link><description><![CDATA[Bryan Kohberger’s defense sought to have the indictment against him dismissed by attacking the grand-jury process that produced the four first-degree murder charges and burglary charge. In one motion, the defense argued that the grand jury had been given the wrong legal standard when it was told that it could indict Kohberger upon finding probable cause. His attorneys contended that Idaho law and its historical development required a much higher standard, essentially arguing that the grand jury should have been instructed to determine whether the evidence established the charges beyond a reasonable doubt. The defense maintained that because the grand jury had operated under the lower probable-cause threshold, the indictment was legally defective and should either be dismissed or the case returned to a preliminary hearing. The court rejected that interpretation, concluding that Idaho law clearly established probable cause as the proper standard for a grand jury deciding whether sufficient evidence existed to send a defendant to trial.<br /><br />Kohberger’s attorneys also filed a broader motion attacking what had actually occurred before the grand jury. They alleged that the grand jury had been biased, that prosecutors had presented inadmissible or insufficient evidence, and that the state had committed prosecutorial misconduct by withholding potentially exculpatory information from the jurors. In effect, the defense argued that the indictment could not be trusted because the grand jury had not received a sufficiently fair or legally sound presentation of the case against Kohberger. Judge John Judge ultimately rejected those claims as well, finding that Kohberger had not demonstrated juror bias, prosecutorial misconduct, or an absence of sufficient admissible evidence. The court determined that an impartial grand jury had heard enough evidence to establish probable cause that Kohberger committed the charged crimes, leaving the indictment intact and allowing the prosecution to continue toward trial.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73675524</guid><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73675524/megakohbergermotiondismiss.mp3" length="50155982" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ea4f486b-283e-4460-b937-1a22f09216d9/ea4f486b-283e-4460-b937-1a22f09216d9.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ea4f486b-283e-4460-b937-1a22f09216d9/ea4f486b-283e-4460-b937-1a22f09216d9.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ea4f486b-283e-4460-b937-1a22f09216d9/ea4f486b-283e-4460-b937-1a22f09216d9.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Bryan Kohberger’s defense sought to have the indictment against him dismissed by attacking the grand-jury process that produced the four first-degree murder charges and burglary charge. In one motion, the defense argued that the grand jury had been...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Bryan Kohberger’s defense sought to have the indictment against him dismissed by attacking the grand-jury process that produced the four first-degree murder charges and burglary charge. In one motion, the defense argued that the grand jury had been given the wrong legal standard when it was told that it could indict Kohberger upon finding probable cause. His attorneys contended that Idaho law and its historical development required a much higher standard, essentially arguing that the grand jury should have been instructed to determine whether the evidence established the charges beyond a reasonable doubt. The defense maintained that because the grand jury had operated under the lower probable-cause threshold, the indictment was legally defective and should either be dismissed or the case returned to a preliminary hearing. The court rejected that interpretation, concluding that Idaho law clearly established probable cause as the proper standard for a grand jury deciding whether sufficient evidence existed to send a defendant to trial.<br /><br />Kohberger’s attorneys also filed a broader motion attacking what had actually occurred before the grand jury. They alleged that the grand jury had been biased, that prosecutors had presented inadmissible or insufficient evidence, and that the state had committed prosecutorial misconduct by withholding potentially exculpatory information from the jurors. In effect, the defense argued that the indictment could not be trusted because the grand jury had not received a sufficiently fair or legally sound presentation of the case against Kohberger. Judge John Judge ultimately rejected those claims as well, finding that Kohberger had not demonstrated juror bias, prosecutorial misconduct, or an absence of sufficient admissible evidence. The court determined that an impartial grand jury had heard enough evidence to establish probable cause that Kohberger committed the charged crimes, leaving the indictment intact and allowing the prosecution to continue toward trial.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3135</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Judge Hippler's Order On Bryan Kohberger's Capital Punishment Motions (Part 3)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/judge-hippler-s-order-on-bryan-kohberger-s-capital-punishment-motions-part-3--73395951</link><description><![CDATA[In State v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, Judge Steven Hippler issued a Memorandum Decision and Order addressing multiple defense motions aimed at removing the death penalty as a sentencing option. The defense presented 12 motions challenging various aspects of Idaho's capital punishment framework, including the constitutionality of execution methods and the applicability of certain aggravating factors. After thorough consideration, Judge Hippler denied all motions, affirming that the death penalty remains a viable sentencing option in this case.<br /><br />The court's 55-page decision systematically addressed each defense argument, referencing precedents set by the Idaho Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court that uphold the constitutionality of capital punishment. Judge Hippler concluded that the defense's claims did not warrant the removal of the death penalty, allowing the prosecution to continue seeking it as a potential sentence. This ruling signifies a pivotal moment in the proceedings, underscoring the court's commitment to adhering to established legal standards in capital cases. <br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/isc.coi/CR01-24-31665/2024/112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73395951</guid><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 04:30:06 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73395951/moscowdeathpenaltyorder3.mp3" length="11854620" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7ac0ef11-031f-4575-9f82-a881d8a0fa73/7ac0ef11-031f-4575-9f82-a881d8a0fa73.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7ac0ef11-031f-4575-9f82-a881d8a0fa73/7ac0ef11-031f-4575-9f82-a881d8a0fa73.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7ac0ef11-031f-4575-9f82-a881d8a0fa73/7ac0ef11-031f-4575-9f82-a881d8a0fa73.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In State v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, Judge Steven Hippler issued a Memorandum Decision and Order addressing multiple defense motions aimed at removing the death penalty as a sentencing option. The defense presented 12 motions...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In State v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, Judge Steven Hippler issued a Memorandum Decision and Order addressing multiple defense motions aimed at removing the death penalty as a sentencing option. The defense presented 12 motions challenging various aspects of Idaho's capital punishment framework, including the constitutionality of execution methods and the applicability of certain aggravating factors. After thorough consideration, Judge Hippler denied all motions, affirming that the death penalty remains a viable sentencing option in this case.<br /><br />The court's 55-page decision systematically addressed each defense argument, referencing precedents set by the Idaho Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court that uphold the constitutionality of capital punishment. Judge Hippler concluded that the defense's claims did not warrant the removal of the death penalty, allowing the prosecution to continue seeking it as a potential sentence. This ruling signifies a pivotal moment in the proceedings, underscoring the court's commitment to adhering to established legal standards in capital cases. <br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/isc.coi/CR01-24-31665/2024/112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>741</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Judge Hippler's Order On Bryan Kohberger's Capital Punishment Motions (Part 2)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/judge-hippler-s-order-on-bryan-kohberger-s-capital-punishment-motions-part-2--73395952</link><description><![CDATA[In State v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, Judge Steven Hippler issued a Memorandum Decision and Order addressing multiple defense motions aimed at removing the death penalty as a sentencing option. The defense presented 12 motions challenging various aspects of Idaho's capital punishment framework, including the constitutionality of execution methods and the applicability of certain aggravating factors. After thorough consideration, Judge Hippler denied all motions, affirming that the death penalty remains a viable sentencing option in this case.<br /><br />The court's 55-page decision systematically addressed each defense argument, referencing precedents set by the Idaho Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court that uphold the constitutionality of capital punishment. Judge Hippler concluded that the defense's claims did not warrant the removal of the death penalty, allowing the prosecution to continue seeking it as a potential sentence. This ruling signifies a pivotal moment in the proceedings, underscoring the court's commitment to adhering to established legal standards in capital cases. <br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/isc.coi/CR01-24-31665/2024/112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73395952</guid><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 02:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73395952/moscowdeathpenaltyorder2.mp3" length="12324824" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1aac28ce-5ffc-4f96-a98f-d508ae456858/1aac28ce-5ffc-4f96-a98f-d508ae456858.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1aac28ce-5ffc-4f96-a98f-d508ae456858/1aac28ce-5ffc-4f96-a98f-d508ae456858.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1aac28ce-5ffc-4f96-a98f-d508ae456858/1aac28ce-5ffc-4f96-a98f-d508ae456858.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In State v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, Judge Steven Hippler issued a Memorandum Decision and Order addressing multiple defense motions aimed at removing the death penalty as a sentencing option. The defense presented 12 motions...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In State v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, Judge Steven Hippler issued a Memorandum Decision and Order addressing multiple defense motions aimed at removing the death penalty as a sentencing option. The defense presented 12 motions challenging various aspects of Idaho's capital punishment framework, including the constitutionality of execution methods and the applicability of certain aggravating factors. After thorough consideration, Judge Hippler denied all motions, affirming that the death penalty remains a viable sentencing option in this case.<br /><br />The court's 55-page decision systematically addressed each defense argument, referencing precedents set by the Idaho Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court that uphold the constitutionality of capital punishment. Judge Hippler concluded that the defense's claims did not warrant the removal of the death penalty, allowing the prosecution to continue seeking it as a potential sentence. This ruling signifies a pivotal moment in the proceedings, underscoring the court's commitment to adhering to established legal standards in capital cases. <br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/isc.coi/CR01-24-31665/2024/112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>771</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Tyler Robinson Preliminary Hearing Transcripts (Day 1-Part 1) (8/8/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcripts-day-1-part-1-8-8-26--73672322</link><description><![CDATA[Day one of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing on July 6, 2026, largely centered on prosecutors beginning to construct a timeline of Charlie Kirk’s killing at Utah Valley University and establishing the authenticity of the surveillance footage and investigative records they intended to use against Robinson. Former UVU police officer Chris Bagley described the moment the gunshot rang out during Kirk’s September 10, 2025 event and the chaos that followed, while Utah State Bureau of Investigation agent David Hull walked the court through the enormous video-review effort undertaken after the shooting. Hull testified that investigators examined hundreds of hours of surveillance footage and ultimately tracked a person they believed was Robinson moving around the UVU campus at several different points that day. Prosecutors introduced surveillance recordings from multiple locations as they attempted to connect the person seen approaching the campus, moving toward the area surrounding the Losee Center, and later leaving the area to Robinson. Three separate videos depicting Kirk being shot were admitted, although Judge Tony Graf determined that their graphic nature warranted restricting their display to the attorneys’ and judge’s monitors rather than broadcasting them throughout the courtroom. Kirk’s widow, Erika, and his parents left the courtroom while the videos were reviewed. Prosecutors also introduced Kirk’s autopsy report through Hull, which listed his cause of death as a gunshot wound to the neck and the manner of death as homicide<br /><br />The defense spent much of the first day attacking the manner in which the prosecution was getting its evidence into the record rather than attempting to disprove the entire prosecution theory at that stage. Kathryn Nester and Robinson’s attorneys repeatedly raised hearsay, foundation and authentication objections, arguing that investigators were being permitted to introduce reports, statements and records created by other people without those individuals appearing personally to testify. Judge Graf overruled most of those objections, reflecting the substantially lower evidentiary threshold governing a Utah preliminary hearing, whose purpose was only to determine whether probable cause existed to send Robinson to trial rather than whether prosecutors could prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. One significant exception involved an edited compilation of surveillance footage, which Graf declined to admit in that form and required prosecutors to replace with the underlying unedited material. Hull’s testimony also revealed the scope of the prosecution’s surveillance theory: investigators claimed Robinson had appeared on or around the UVU campus multiple times on September 10 and that they were attempting to stitch those appearances together into a continuous identification of the alleged shooter. By the end of day one, prosecutors had established the killing itself, the medical cause of Kirk’s death, the existence and authenticity of substantial video evidence and the beginnings of their effort to identify Robinson as the person captured in that footage. They had not yet presented many of the pieces expected to become more consequential later in the hearing, including the rifle and DNA evidence, Robinson’s alleged communications and admissions, and testimony concerning his roommate Lance Twiggs.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73672322</guid><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73672322/robinsonprelim1.mp3" length="12750724" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/27eddaf6-ec39-48be-ad64-d0c02bd88d64/27eddaf6-ec39-48be-ad64-d0c02bd88d64.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/27eddaf6-ec39-48be-ad64-d0c02bd88d64/27eddaf6-ec39-48be-ad64-d0c02bd88d64.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/27eddaf6-ec39-48be-ad64-d0c02bd88d64/27eddaf6-ec39-48be-ad64-d0c02bd88d64.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Day one of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing on July 6, 2026, largely centered on prosecutors beginning to construct a timeline of Charlie Kirk’s killing at Utah Valley University and establishing the authenticity of the surveillance footage and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Day one of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing on July 6, 2026, largely centered on prosecutors beginning to construct a timeline of Charlie Kirk’s killing at Utah Valley University and establishing the authenticity of the surveillance footage and investigative records they intended to use against Robinson. Former UVU police officer Chris Bagley described the moment the gunshot rang out during Kirk’s September 10, 2025 event and the chaos that followed, while Utah State Bureau of Investigation agent David Hull walked the court through the enormous video-review effort undertaken after the shooting. Hull testified that investigators examined hundreds of hours of surveillance footage and ultimately tracked a person they believed was Robinson moving around the UVU campus at several different points that day. Prosecutors introduced surveillance recordings from multiple locations as they attempted to connect the person seen approaching the campus, moving toward the area surrounding the Losee Center, and later leaving the area to Robinson. Three separate videos depicting Kirk being shot were admitted, although Judge Tony Graf determined that their graphic nature warranted restricting their display to the attorneys’ and judge’s monitors rather than broadcasting them throughout the courtroom. Kirk’s widow, Erika, and his parents left the courtroom while the videos were reviewed. Prosecutors also introduced Kirk’s autopsy report through Hull, which listed his cause of death as a gunshot wound to the neck and the manner of death as homicide<br /><br />The defense spent much of the first day attacking the manner in which the prosecution was getting its evidence into the record rather than attempting to disprove the entire prosecution theory at that stage. Kathryn Nester and Robinson’s attorneys repeatedly raised hearsay, foundation and authentication objections, arguing that investigators were being permitted to introduce reports, statements and records created by other people without those individuals appearing personally to testify. Judge Graf overruled most of those objections, reflecting the substantially lower evidentiary threshold governing a Utah preliminary hearing, whose purpose was only to determine whether probable cause existed to send Robinson to trial rather than whether prosecutors could prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. One significant exception involved an edited compilation of surveillance footage, which Graf declined to admit in that form and required prosecutors to replace with the underlying unedited material. Hull’s testimony also revealed the scope of the prosecution’s surveillance theory: investigators claimed Robinson had appeared on or around the UVU campus multiple times on September 10 and that they were attempting to stitch those appearances together into a continuous identification of the alleged shooter. By the end of day one, prosecutors had established the killing itself, the medical cause of Kirk’s death, the existence and authenticity of substantial video evidence and the beginnings of their effort to identify Robinson as the person captured in that footage. They had not yet presented many of the pieces expected to become more consequential later in the hearing, including the rifle and DNA evidence, Robinson’s alleged communications and admissions, and testimony concerning his roommate Lance Twiggs.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>797</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvu</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Murder In Moscow:   The Long Legal Road Behind Kohberger’s Latest Filing (Part 4) (8/8/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-the-long-legal-road-behind-kohberger-s-latest-filing-part-4-8-8-26--73672323</link><description><![CDATA[Bryan Kohberger pleaded guilty in July 2025 to murdering University of Idaho students Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin, avoiding the death penalty in exchange for four consecutive life sentences without parole. The agreement ended years of litigation over DNA found on a knife sheath, surveillance footage of a white Hyundai Elantra, cellphone records, witness testimony, genetic genealogy, and other evidence prosecutors said connected him to the King Road residence. During the plea hearing, Kohberger told the court that he understood the charges, was satisfied with his attorneys, was acting voluntarily, and was pleading guilty because he was guilty. The deal spared the victims’ families from a lengthy capital trial, but it did not answer the lingering questions about motive, the missing murder weapon, or why the four students were targeted.<br /><br />Kohberger is now seeking post-conviction relief and asking the court to allow him to withdraw those guilty pleas. He claims his former attorneys pressured him into falsely confessing, misled him about death-row and prison conditions, provided ineffective representation, and failed to properly disclose or explain potentially exculpatory evidence. His newly appointed attorney, Greg Rauch, is reviewing those allegations, while Idaho prosecutors are defending the convictions and emphasizing Kohberger’s sworn courtroom admissions and the substantial evidence against him. The court has not ruled that his claims are credible, and Kohberger must meet the demanding post-sentencing standard of proving a manifest injustice. Even if he succeeds, he would not be released automatically, because the murder charges could return, the case could proceed to trial, and prosecutors might seek to restore the death penalty.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73672323</guid><pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 22:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73672323/kohbergerstatus4.mp3" length="11212217" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/23901cb0-9bfd-4ccc-812e-980ed03f0291/23901cb0-9bfd-4ccc-812e-980ed03f0291.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/23901cb0-9bfd-4ccc-812e-980ed03f0291/23901cb0-9bfd-4ccc-812e-980ed03f0291.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/23901cb0-9bfd-4ccc-812e-980ed03f0291/23901cb0-9bfd-4ccc-812e-980ed03f0291.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Bryan Kohberger pleaded guilty in July 2025 to murdering University of Idaho students Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin, avoiding the death penalty in exchange for four consecutive life sentences without parole. The...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Bryan Kohberger pleaded guilty in July 2025 to murdering University of Idaho students Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin, avoiding the death penalty in exchange for four consecutive life sentences without parole. The agreement ended years of litigation over DNA found on a knife sheath, surveillance footage of a white Hyundai Elantra, cellphone records, witness testimony, genetic genealogy, and other evidence prosecutors said connected him to the King Road residence. During the plea hearing, Kohberger told the court that he understood the charges, was satisfied with his attorneys, was acting voluntarily, and was pleading guilty because he was guilty. The deal spared the victims’ families from a lengthy capital trial, but it did not answer the lingering questions about motive, the missing murder weapon, or why the four students were targeted.<br /><br />Kohberger is now seeking post-conviction relief and asking the court to allow him to withdraw those guilty pleas. He claims his former attorneys pressured him into falsely confessing, misled him about death-row and prison conditions, provided ineffective representation, and failed to properly disclose or explain potentially exculpatory evidence. His newly appointed attorney, Greg Rauch, is reviewing those allegations, while Idaho prosecutors are defending the convictions and emphasizing Kohberger’s sworn courtroom admissions and the substantial evidence against him. The court has not ruled that his claims are credible, and Kohberger must meet the demanding post-sentencing standard of proving a manifest injustice. Even if he succeeds, he would not be released automatically, because the murder charges could return, the case could proceed to trial, and prosecutors might seek to restore the death penalty.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>701</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Kathy Ruemmler And Her Epstein Related Transcript From Her Trip To Congress (Part 9) (8/8/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/kathy-ruemmler-and-her-epstein-related-transcript-from-her-trip-to-congress-part-9-8-8-26--73504512</link><description><![CDATA[Kathy Ruemmler told congressional investigators that she regretted associating with Jeffrey Epstein but maintained that she did not know he was continuing to abuse girls and young women after his 2008 conviction. The former Obama White House counsel acknowledged meeting with Epstein repeatedly, visiting his properties, exchanging numerous emails with him and accepting professional assistance and gifts, while portraying the relationship as largely intellectual and social. She said Epstein introduced her to prominent figures and discussed legal, political and financial matters with her, but denied representing him in criminal matters or helping conceal his misconduct. Ruemmler also argued that Epstein had misled her about the seriousness of his past crimes, an explanation that left investigators questioning why an experienced former federal prosecutor remained close to a registered sex offender.<br /><br />The most damaging portion of Ruemmler’s testimony concerned Virginia Giuffre. Ruemmler said some of Giuffre’s allegations “lacked inherent credibility” and was questioned about a 2015 email in which she discussed whether counterclaims could be brought against Giuffre while Giuffre was suing Ghislaine Maxwell. Ruemmler claimed she did not remember the message and suggested she may merely have been responding conversationally to Epstein rather than actively developing a legal strategy against Giuffre. She said she had no reason to doubt that Giuffre had been abused, yet stopped short of affirming that Epstein and Maxwell had victimized her. Taken together, the testimony showed Ruemmler attempting to minimize her role and distance herself from Epstein while struggling to explain why she maintained such a close relationship with him and appeared willing to question one of his most prominent accusers.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Ruemmler-Final-Transcript_Redact-7.28.26.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ruemmler-Final-Transcript_Redact-7.28.26.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73504512</guid><pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73504512/ruemmler9.mp3" length="13720390" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9c7a332e-af64-47fe-91a0-e116e9ef96f3/9c7a332e-af64-47fe-91a0-e116e9ef96f3.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9c7a332e-af64-47fe-91a0-e116e9ef96f3/9c7a332e-af64-47fe-91a0-e116e9ef96f3.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9c7a332e-af64-47fe-91a0-e116e9ef96f3/9c7a332e-af64-47fe-91a0-e116e9ef96f3.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Kathy Ruemmler told congressional investigators that she regretted associating with Jeffrey Epstein but maintained that she did not know he was continuing to abuse girls and young women after his 2008 conviction. The former Obama White House counsel...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Kathy Ruemmler told congressional investigators that she regretted associating with Jeffrey Epstein but maintained that she did not know he was continuing to abuse girls and young women after his 2008 conviction. The former Obama White House counsel acknowledged meeting with Epstein repeatedly, visiting his properties, exchanging numerous emails with him and accepting professional assistance and gifts, while portraying the relationship as largely intellectual and social. She said Epstein introduced her to prominent figures and discussed legal, political and financial matters with her, but denied representing him in criminal matters or helping conceal his misconduct. Ruemmler also argued that Epstein had misled her about the seriousness of his past crimes, an explanation that left investigators questioning why an experienced former federal prosecutor remained close to a registered sex offender.<br /><br />The most damaging portion of Ruemmler’s testimony concerned Virginia Giuffre. Ruemmler said some of Giuffre’s allegations “lacked inherent credibility” and was questioned about a 2015 email in which she discussed whether counterclaims could be brought against Giuffre while Giuffre was suing Ghislaine Maxwell. Ruemmler claimed she did not remember the message and suggested she may merely have been responding conversationally to Epstein rather than actively developing a legal strategy against Giuffre. She said she had no reason to doubt that Giuffre had been abused, yet stopped short of affirming that Epstein and Maxwell had victimized her. Taken together, the testimony showed Ruemmler attempting to minimize her role and distance herself from Epstein while struggling to explain why she maintained such a close relationship with him and appeared willing to question one of his most prominent accusers.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Ruemmler-Final-Transcript_Redact-7.28.26.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ruemmler-Final-Transcript_Redact-7.28.26.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>858</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Kathy Ruemmler And Her Epstein Related Transcript From Her Trip To Congress (Part 8) (8/8/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/kathy-ruemmler-and-her-epstein-related-transcript-from-her-trip-to-congress-part-8-8-8-26--73504510</link><description><![CDATA[Kathy Ruemmler told congressional investigators that she regretted associating with Jeffrey Epstein but maintained that she did not know he was continuing to abuse girls and young women after his 2008 conviction. The former Obama White House counsel acknowledged meeting with Epstein repeatedly, visiting his properties, exchanging numerous emails with him and accepting professional assistance and gifts, while portraying the relationship as largely intellectual and social. She said Epstein introduced her to prominent figures and discussed legal, political and financial matters with her, but denied representing him in criminal matters or helping conceal his misconduct. Ruemmler also argued that Epstein had misled her about the seriousness of his past crimes, an explanation that left investigators questioning why an experienced former federal prosecutor remained close to a registered sex offender.<br /><br />The most damaging portion of Ruemmler’s testimony concerned Virginia Giuffre. Ruemmler said some of Giuffre’s allegations “lacked inherent credibility” and was questioned about a 2015 email in which she discussed whether counterclaims could be brought against Giuffre while Giuffre was suing Ghislaine Maxwell. Ruemmler claimed she did not remember the message and suggested she may merely have been responding conversationally to Epstein rather than actively developing a legal strategy against Giuffre. She said she had no reason to doubt that Giuffre had been abused, yet stopped short of affirming that Epstein and Maxwell had victimized her. Taken together, the testimony showed Ruemmler attempting to minimize her role and distance herself from Epstein while struggling to explain why she maintained such a close relationship with him and appeared willing to question one of his most prominent accusers.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Ruemmler-Final-Transcript_Redact-7.28.26.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ruemmler-Final-Transcript_Redact-7.28.26.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73504510</guid><pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 18:30:07 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73504510/ruemmler8.mp3" length="11766431" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/60ad5d6b-b1a1-4ae7-b2f8-0fa2c15ab555/60ad5d6b-b1a1-4ae7-b2f8-0fa2c15ab555.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/60ad5d6b-b1a1-4ae7-b2f8-0fa2c15ab555/60ad5d6b-b1a1-4ae7-b2f8-0fa2c15ab555.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/60ad5d6b-b1a1-4ae7-b2f8-0fa2c15ab555/60ad5d6b-b1a1-4ae7-b2f8-0fa2c15ab555.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Kathy Ruemmler told congressional investigators that she regretted associating with Jeffrey Epstein but maintained that she did not know he was continuing to abuse girls and young women after his 2008 conviction. The former Obama White House counsel...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Kathy Ruemmler told congressional investigators that she regretted associating with Jeffrey Epstein but maintained that she did not know he was continuing to abuse girls and young women after his 2008 conviction. The former Obama White House counsel acknowledged meeting with Epstein repeatedly, visiting his properties, exchanging numerous emails with him and accepting professional assistance and gifts, while portraying the relationship as largely intellectual and social. She said Epstein introduced her to prominent figures and discussed legal, political and financial matters with her, but denied representing him in criminal matters or helping conceal his misconduct. Ruemmler also argued that Epstein had misled her about the seriousness of his past crimes, an explanation that left investigators questioning why an experienced former federal prosecutor remained close to a registered sex offender.<br /><br />The most damaging portion of Ruemmler’s testimony concerned Virginia Giuffre. Ruemmler said some of Giuffre’s allegations “lacked inherent credibility” and was questioned about a 2015 email in which she discussed whether counterclaims could be brought against Giuffre while Giuffre was suing Ghislaine Maxwell. Ruemmler claimed she did not remember the message and suggested she may merely have been responding conversationally to Epstein rather than actively developing a legal strategy against Giuffre. She said she had no reason to doubt that Giuffre had been abused, yet stopped short of affirming that Epstein and Maxwell had victimized her. Taken together, the testimony showed Ruemmler attempting to minimize her role and distance herself from Epstein while struggling to explain why she maintained such a close relationship with him and appeared willing to question one of his most prominent accusers.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Ruemmler-Final-Transcript_Redact-7.28.26.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ruemmler-Final-Transcript_Redact-7.28.26.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>736</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Kathy Ruemmler And Her Epstein Related Transcript From Her Trip To Congress (Part 7) (8/8/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/kathy-ruemmler-and-her-epstein-related-transcript-from-her-trip-to-congress-part-7-8-8-26--73567271</link><description><![CDATA[Kathy Ruemmler told congressional investigators that she regretted associating with Jeffrey Epstein but maintained that she did not know he was continuing to abuse girls and young women after his 2008 conviction. The former Obama White House counsel acknowledged meeting with Epstein repeatedly, visiting his properties, exchanging numerous emails with him and accepting professional assistance and gifts, while portraying the relationship as largely intellectual and social. She said Epstein introduced her to prominent figures and discussed legal, political and financial matters with her, but denied representing him in criminal matters or helping conceal his misconduct. Ruemmler also argued that Epstein had misled her about the seriousness of his past crimes, an explanation that left investigators questioning why an experienced former federal prosecutor remained close to a registered sex offender.<br /><br />The most damaging portion of Ruemmler’s testimony concerned Virginia Giuffre. Ruemmler said some of Giuffre’s allegations “lacked inherent credibility” and was questioned about a 2015 email in which she discussed whether counterclaims could be brought against Giuffre while Giuffre was suing Ghislaine Maxwell. Ruemmler claimed she did not remember the message and suggested she may merely have been responding conversationally to Epstein rather than actively developing a legal strategy against Giuffre. She said she had no reason to doubt that Giuffre had been abused, yet stopped short of affirming that Epstein and Maxwell had victimized her. Taken together, the testimony showed Ruemmler attempting to minimize her role and distance herself from Epstein while struggling to explain why she maintained such a close relationship with him and appeared willing to question one of his most prominent accusers.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Ruemmler-Final-Transcript_Redact-7.28.26.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ruemmler-Final-Transcript_Redact-7.28.26.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73567271</guid><pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 16:30:05 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73567271/ruemmler7.mp3" length="14692563" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c45b8cf5-e258-48f3-be04-26c03a2ee283/c45b8cf5-e258-48f3-be04-26c03a2ee283.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c45b8cf5-e258-48f3-be04-26c03a2ee283/c45b8cf5-e258-48f3-be04-26c03a2ee283.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c45b8cf5-e258-48f3-be04-26c03a2ee283/c45b8cf5-e258-48f3-be04-26c03a2ee283.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Kathy Ruemmler told congressional investigators that she regretted associating with Jeffrey Epstein but maintained that she did not know he was continuing to abuse girls and young women after his 2008 conviction. The former Obama White House counsel...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Kathy Ruemmler told congressional investigators that she regretted associating with Jeffrey Epstein but maintained that she did not know he was continuing to abuse girls and young women after his 2008 conviction. The former Obama White House counsel acknowledged meeting with Epstein repeatedly, visiting his properties, exchanging numerous emails with him and accepting professional assistance and gifts, while portraying the relationship as largely intellectual and social. She said Epstein introduced her to prominent figures and discussed legal, political and financial matters with her, but denied representing him in criminal matters or helping conceal his misconduct. Ruemmler also argued that Epstein had misled her about the seriousness of his past crimes, an explanation that left investigators questioning why an experienced former federal prosecutor remained close to a registered sex offender.<br /><br />The most damaging portion of Ruemmler’s testimony concerned Virginia Giuffre. Ruemmler said some of Giuffre’s allegations “lacked inherent credibility” and was questioned about a 2015 email in which she discussed whether counterclaims could be brought against Giuffre while Giuffre was suing Ghislaine Maxwell. Ruemmler claimed she did not remember the message and suggested she may merely have been responding conversationally to Epstein rather than actively developing a legal strategy against Giuffre. She said she had no reason to doubt that Giuffre had been abused, yet stopped short of affirming that Epstein and Maxwell had victimized her. Taken together, the testimony showed Ruemmler attempting to minimize her role and distance herself from Epstein while struggling to explain why she maintained such a close relationship with him and appeared willing to question one of his most prominent accusers.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Ruemmler-Final-Transcript_Redact-7.28.26.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ruemmler-Final-Transcript_Redact-7.28.26.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>919</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Bryan Kohberger And The Mad Greek Restaurant (8/8/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-the-mad-greek-restaurant-8-8-26--73623869</link><description><![CDATA[The reporting about Bryan Kohberger and the Mad Greek restaurant became one of the more disputed early stories to emerge after his arrest for the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. In January 2023, People magazine reported that Kohberger had eaten at the Mad Greek in Moscow, Idaho, where Mogen and Kernodle had worked as servers. The magazine cited a former employee who claimed Kohberger had visited the restaurant at least twice and stood out because of his strict vegan diet and concerns about his food coming into contact with animal products. People also reported that an investigator familiar with the case had confirmed that law enforcement was aware of the alleged restaurant visits. The report immediately attracted attention because, if accurate, it potentially placed Kohberger inside the workplace of two of the victims before the murders and raised obvious questions about whether he had encountered or noticed either woman there. At the time, however, there was no publicly released law-enforcement evidence establishing that Kohberger had actually been inside the Mad Greek.<br /><br />The owners of the Mad Greek strongly rejected the story, saying they had no record or recollection of Kohberger ever eating there and calling the information behind the report fabricated. Owner Jackie Fischer publicly criticized the reporting and said the restaurant had already provided authorities with everything requested of it. People magazine did not retract the story and instead stood by its reporting when challenged about the restaurant's denial, leaving two directly conflicting accounts in the public record. The dispute became an example of how difficult it was to separate confirmed evidence from source-based reporting during the early stages of the Kohberger investigation, particularly while investigators were releasing very little information publicly. The Mad Greek maintained that the reported visits never happened, while People maintained that its sources supported the story. Years later, People continued to report that Kohberger had visited a restaurant where two of the victims worked, but the alleged Mad Greek visits were never publicly established through the kind of documentary or courtroom evidence that would definitively settle the original dispute.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73623869</guid><pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 14:30:06 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73623869/megakohbergergreek.mp3" length="34741647" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ff32de94-0c31-45db-be2c-164029cc55de/ff32de94-0c31-45db-be2c-164029cc55de.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ff32de94-0c31-45db-be2c-164029cc55de/ff32de94-0c31-45db-be2c-164029cc55de.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ff32de94-0c31-45db-be2c-164029cc55de/ff32de94-0c31-45db-be2c-164029cc55de.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The reporting about Bryan Kohberger and the Mad Greek restaurant became one of the more disputed early stories to emerge after his arrest for the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. In January 2023, People...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The reporting about Bryan Kohberger and the Mad Greek restaurant became one of the more disputed early stories to emerge after his arrest for the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. In January 2023, People magazine reported that Kohberger had eaten at the Mad Greek in Moscow, Idaho, where Mogen and Kernodle had worked as servers. The magazine cited a former employee who claimed Kohberger had visited the restaurant at least twice and stood out because of his strict vegan diet and concerns about his food coming into contact with animal products. People also reported that an investigator familiar with the case had confirmed that law enforcement was aware of the alleged restaurant visits. The report immediately attracted attention because, if accurate, it potentially placed Kohberger inside the workplace of two of the victims before the murders and raised obvious questions about whether he had encountered or noticed either woman there. At the time, however, there was no publicly released law-enforcement evidence establishing that Kohberger had actually been inside the Mad Greek.<br /><br />The owners of the Mad Greek strongly rejected the story, saying they had no record or recollection of Kohberger ever eating there and calling the information behind the report fabricated. Owner Jackie Fischer publicly criticized the reporting and said the restaurant had already provided authorities with everything requested of it. People magazine did not retract the story and instead stood by its reporting when challenged about the restaurant's denial, leaving two directly conflicting accounts in the public record. The dispute became an example of how difficult it was to separate confirmed evidence from source-based reporting during the early stages of the Kohberger investigation, particularly while investigators were releasing very little information publicly. The Mad Greek maintained that the reported visits never happened, while People maintained that its sources supported the story. Years later, People continued to report that Kohberger had visited a restaurant where two of the victims worked, but the alleged Mad Greek visits were never publicly established through the kind of documentary or courtroom evidence that would definitively settle the original dispute.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2172</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The Order Denying The AP's Motion To Remove The Kohberger Gag Order (8/8/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-order-denying-the-ap-s-motion-to-remove-the-kohberger-gag-order-8-8-26--73623871</link><description><![CDATA[Judge John Judge denied the Associated Press coalition’s motion to completely vacate the amended nondissemination order in Bryan Kohberger’s case, finding that restrictions on certain public statements remained necessary to protect Kohberger’s Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial before an impartial jury. The court emphasized that the order did not prohibit the media from reporting on the case, conducting its own investigations or publishing information it independently obtained. Instead, it restricted certain attorneys and people acting on their behalf from making out-of-court statements that could materially prejudice the proceedings. Judge Judge rejected the argument that the restrictions amounted to a gag order on the press itself and concluded that the court had the authority to regulate the speech of lawyers participating in the case when necessary to prevent prejudicial publicity from influencing potential jurors. The ruling placed substantial weight on the extraordinary public attention surrounding the murders and the danger that statements from attorneys or other official participants could carry additional credibility with prospective jurors. In the court’s view, Kohberger’s constitutional right to have his case decided by an impartial jury justified maintaining some limitations on what those directly connected to the prosecution could say publicly.<br /><br />At the same time, Judge Judge did not simply leave the existing order untouched. He acknowledged concerns that portions of it were too broad or unclear and issued a revised amended nondissemination order that narrowed both the people covered and the subjects they were prohibited from discussing. The revised order focused on statements that a lawyer or covered individual knew, or reasonably should have known, created a substantial likelihood of materially prejudicing the case, including public discussion of evidence expected at trial, potential testimony, opinions about guilt or innocence and other information capable of influencing the proceedings. The court therefore attempted to balance the media’s First Amendment interests against Kohberger’s Sixth Amendment protections rather than treating either right as absolute. The AP coalition succeeded in forcing the court to reconsider and clarify the scope of the restrictions, but it did not succeed in eliminating them altogether. The ultimate ruling was that some restraint on public commentary remained justified because the possibility of prejudicing the jury pool was sufficiently serious, but those restrictions had to be more precisely tailored than they had been under the earlier version of the order.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbyapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73623871</guid><pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 12:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73623871/megaorderdenyingapremovegag.mp3" length="70295763" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/73df2314-24f5-4f34-adef-9abea4b00e70/73df2314-24f5-4f34-adef-9abea4b00e70.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/73df2314-24f5-4f34-adef-9abea4b00e70/73df2314-24f5-4f34-adef-9abea4b00e70.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/73df2314-24f5-4f34-adef-9abea4b00e70/73df2314-24f5-4f34-adef-9abea4b00e70.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Judge John Judge denied the Associated Press coalition’s motion to completely vacate the amended nondissemination order in Bryan Kohberger’s case, finding that restrictions on certain public statements remained necessary to protect Kohberger’s Sixth...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Judge John Judge denied the Associated Press coalition’s motion to completely vacate the amended nondissemination order in Bryan Kohberger’s case, finding that restrictions on certain public statements remained necessary to protect Kohberger’s Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial before an impartial jury. The court emphasized that the order did not prohibit the media from reporting on the case, conducting its own investigations or publishing information it independently obtained. Instead, it restricted certain attorneys and people acting on their behalf from making out-of-court statements that could materially prejudice the proceedings. Judge Judge rejected the argument that the restrictions amounted to a gag order on the press itself and concluded that the court had the authority to regulate the speech of lawyers participating in the case when necessary to prevent prejudicial publicity from influencing potential jurors. The ruling placed substantial weight on the extraordinary public attention surrounding the murders and the danger that statements from attorneys or other official participants could carry additional credibility with prospective jurors. In the court’s view, Kohberger’s constitutional right to have his case decided by an impartial jury justified maintaining some limitations on what those directly connected to the prosecution could say publicly.<br /><br />At the same time, Judge Judge did not simply leave the existing order untouched. He acknowledged concerns that portions of it were too broad or unclear and issued a revised amended nondissemination order that narrowed both the people covered and the subjects they were prohibited from discussing. The revised order focused on statements that a lawyer or covered individual knew, or reasonably should have known, created a substantial likelihood of materially prejudicing the case, including public discussion of evidence expected at trial, potential testimony, opinions about guilt or innocence and other information capable of influencing the proceedings. The court therefore attempted to balance the media’s First Amendment interests against Kohberger’s Sixth Amendment protections rather than treating either right as absolute. The AP coalition succeeded in forcing the court to reconsider and clarify the scope of the restrictions, but it did not succeed in eliminating them altogether. The ultimate ruling was that some restraint on public commentary remained justified because the possibility of prejudicing the jury pool was sufficiently serious, but those restrictions had to be more precisely tailored than they had been under the earlier version of the order.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbyapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4394</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Wendy Olson's Declaration In Support Of Removing The Kohberger Gag Order (8/8/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-wendy-olson-s-declaration-in-support-of-removing-the-kohberger-gag-order-8-8-26--73623872</link><description><![CDATA[Wendy Olson’s declaration, filed on behalf of the Associated Press and the other media organizations challenging the nondissemination order in the Bryan Kohberger case, was designed to show that the restrictions were having real consequences far beyond simply preventing attorneys from talking about the evidence. Olson documented numerous instances in which journalists had been unable to obtain information because government officials, law-enforcement agencies and others believed the gag order prevented them from speaking or releasing records. A victim’s family had indicated that it wanted to speak publicly about Kohberger’s prosecution but believed it was restricted by the order, while a Washington agency sought judicial guidance over whether it could even release 911 recordings in response to public-records requests. Pennsylvania State Police officials declined to discuss whether investigators were reviewing unsolved cases for possible connections to Kohberger, citing the nondissemination order, and Moscow Mayor Art Bettge said he had been advised that he could not answer questions about how the community was recovering after the murders. Reporters also described public-records requests being denied by the Latah County Sheriff’s Office, Moscow Police Department, Pullman Police Department and Washington State Patrol because of the restrictions. Olson’s declaration therefore attempted to demonstrate that the order was not merely controlling courtroom participants, but was effectively choking off legitimate avenues of newsgathering surrounding one of the most important criminal cases in Idaho.<br /><br />Olson argued that those examples demonstrated why the media coalition believed the order was excessively broad and constitutionally problematic. Journalists said they were prevented from obtaining even relatively routine information, including details surrounding Kohberger’s incarceration and booking, with Law&amp;Crime reporter Angenette Levy reporting that the Latah County Sheriff’s Office refused to provide Kohberger’s booking video because of the court’s order. The declaration supported the coalition’s larger argument that the court had imposed and later expanded the restrictions without first taking evidence or making specific factual findings demonstrating that such sweeping limitations were necessary to protect Kohberger’s right to a fair trial. Olson and the media organizations maintained that there were less restrictive ways to address concerns about prejudicial publicity without cutting reporters off from sources and public records. Their position was not that Kohberger’s fair-trial rights should be ignored, but that those rights could not automatically override the First Amendment rights of the press and public without evidence showing that the restrictions were actually necessary. Olson’s declaration was therefore important because it put concrete examples behind what otherwise could have been an abstract constitutional argument: according to the media coalition, the gag order was already preventing journalists from gathering basic information, discouraging people from speaking publicly and creating uncertainty among government agencies about what information they were legally permitted to release.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73623872</guid><pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 10:30:05 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73623872/megawendyolsondeclarationsupportremovegag.mp3" length="51726672" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/136b175d-8020-4551-b086-73daf2ac08e2/136b175d-8020-4551-b086-73daf2ac08e2.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/136b175d-8020-4551-b086-73daf2ac08e2/136b175d-8020-4551-b086-73daf2ac08e2.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/136b175d-8020-4551-b086-73daf2ac08e2/136b175d-8020-4551-b086-73daf2ac08e2.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Wendy Olson’s declaration, filed on behalf of the Associated Press and the other media organizations challenging the nondissemination order in the Bryan Kohberger case, was designed to show that the restrictions were having real consequences far...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Wendy Olson’s declaration, filed on behalf of the Associated Press and the other media organizations challenging the nondissemination order in the Bryan Kohberger case, was designed to show that the restrictions were having real consequences far beyond simply preventing attorneys from talking about the evidence. Olson documented numerous instances in which journalists had been unable to obtain information because government officials, law-enforcement agencies and others believed the gag order prevented them from speaking or releasing records. A victim’s family had indicated that it wanted to speak publicly about Kohberger’s prosecution but believed it was restricted by the order, while a Washington agency sought judicial guidance over whether it could even release 911 recordings in response to public-records requests. Pennsylvania State Police officials declined to discuss whether investigators were reviewing unsolved cases for possible connections to Kohberger, citing the nondissemination order, and Moscow Mayor Art Bettge said he had been advised that he could not answer questions about how the community was recovering after the murders. Reporters also described public-records requests being denied by the Latah County Sheriff’s Office, Moscow Police Department, Pullman Police Department and Washington State Patrol because of the restrictions. Olson’s declaration therefore attempted to demonstrate that the order was not merely controlling courtroom participants, but was effectively choking off legitimate avenues of newsgathering surrounding one of the most important criminal cases in Idaho.<br /><br />Olson argued that those examples demonstrated why the media coalition believed the order was excessively broad and constitutionally problematic. Journalists said they were prevented from obtaining even relatively routine information, including details surrounding Kohberger’s incarceration and booking, with Law&amp;Crime reporter Angenette Levy reporting that the Latah County Sheriff’s Office refused to provide Kohberger’s booking video because of the court’s order. The declaration supported the coalition’s larger argument that the court had imposed and later expanded the restrictions without first taking evidence or making specific factual findings demonstrating that such sweeping limitations were necessary to protect Kohberger’s right to a fair trial. Olson and the media organizations maintained that there were less restrictive ways to address concerns about prejudicial publicity without cutting reporters off from sources and public records. Their position was not that Kohberger’s fair-trial rights should be ignored, but that those rights could not automatically override the First Amendment rights of the press and public without evidence showing that the restrictions were actually necessary. Olson’s declaration was therefore important because it put concrete examples behind what otherwise could have been an abstract constitutional argument: according to the media coalition, the gag order was already preventing journalists from gathering basic information, discouraging people from speaking publicly and creating uncertainty among government agencies about what information they were legally permitted to release.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3233</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Bryan Kohberger Responds to The Media's Motion To Intervene (8/8/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-responds-to-the-media-s-motion-to-intervene-8-8-26--73623870</link><description><![CDATA[Bryan Kohberger’s attorneys did not oppose allowing the Associated Press and the coalition of news organizations to intervene for the limited purpose of challenging the nondissemination order, but they strongly opposed what the media ultimately wanted the court to do: eliminate that order. The defense argued that the extraordinary amount of publicity surrounding the murders had already created a serious danger to Kohberger’s ability to receive a fair trial before an impartial jury. His attorneys maintained that the nondissemination order was not a gag order on the press because reporters remained free to investigate the case, attend public proceedings and publish whatever information they independently obtained. Instead, the restrictions applied primarily to attorneys, investigators, law-enforcement personnel and others directly involved in the litigation, preventing them from making potentially prejudicial statements outside the courtroom. Kohberger’s defense argued that statements from lawyers and law enforcement carried particular credibility with the public and therefore had an increased ability to influence prospective jurors. To support that position, the defense presented evidence documenting the enormous volume of media coverage surrounding the case and argued that much of that coverage had already portrayed Kohberger negatively.<br /><br /><br />The defense therefore urged the court to preserve restrictions on what participants in the case could publicly discuss, arguing that Kohberger’s Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial outweighed the indirect limitations the order placed on the media’s ability to obtain information from those participants. Kohberger’s attorneys also pushed back against the argument that the order represented an unconstitutional prior restraint on the press, emphasizing that the media itself was not prohibited from speaking or publishing. Their concern was that removing the restrictions would encourage additional public commentary from people with inside knowledge of the investigation, increasing the possibility that prospective jurors would encounter information, accusations or interpretations of the evidence before hearing it in court. Judge John Judge ultimately agreed with much of that reasoning and refused to vacate the nondissemination order, although he acknowledged that portions of the existing order were arguably vague or overly broad and replaced it with a narrower version. The ruling preserved restrictions on statements that were substantially likely to materially prejudice the proceedings while allowing the press to continue independently reporting on the case. In effect, Kohberger’s position was that the media could cover the prosecution as aggressively as it wanted, but prosecutors, defense lawyers, police and other participants should not be allowed to litigate the case through the press before a jury was ever selected.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73623870</guid><pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 08:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73623870/megakohrespondsapintervene.mp3" length="44638084" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/74020016-1a69-4be5-a1ed-20d559aefbe8/74020016-1a69-4be5-a1ed-20d559aefbe8.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/74020016-1a69-4be5-a1ed-20d559aefbe8/74020016-1a69-4be5-a1ed-20d559aefbe8.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/74020016-1a69-4be5-a1ed-20d559aefbe8/74020016-1a69-4be5-a1ed-20d559aefbe8.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Bryan Kohberger’s attorneys did not oppose allowing the Associated Press and the coalition of news organizations to intervene for the limited purpose of challenging the nondissemination order, but they strongly opposed what the media ultimately wanted...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Bryan Kohberger’s attorneys did not oppose allowing the Associated Press and the coalition of news organizations to intervene for the limited purpose of challenging the nondissemination order, but they strongly opposed what the media ultimately wanted the court to do: eliminate that order. The defense argued that the extraordinary amount of publicity surrounding the murders had already created a serious danger to Kohberger’s ability to receive a fair trial before an impartial jury. His attorneys maintained that the nondissemination order was not a gag order on the press because reporters remained free to investigate the case, attend public proceedings and publish whatever information they independently obtained. Instead, the restrictions applied primarily to attorneys, investigators, law-enforcement personnel and others directly involved in the litigation, preventing them from making potentially prejudicial statements outside the courtroom. Kohberger’s defense argued that statements from lawyers and law enforcement carried particular credibility with the public and therefore had an increased ability to influence prospective jurors. To support that position, the defense presented evidence documenting the enormous volume of media coverage surrounding the case and argued that much of that coverage had already portrayed Kohberger negatively.<br /><br /><br />The defense therefore urged the court to preserve restrictions on what participants in the case could publicly discuss, arguing that Kohberger’s Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial outweighed the indirect limitations the order placed on the media’s ability to obtain information from those participants. Kohberger’s attorneys also pushed back against the argument that the order represented an unconstitutional prior restraint on the press, emphasizing that the media itself was not prohibited from speaking or publishing. Their concern was that removing the restrictions would encourage additional public commentary from people with inside knowledge of the investigation, increasing the possibility that prospective jurors would encounter information, accusations or interpretations of the evidence before hearing it in court. Judge John Judge ultimately agreed with much of that reasoning and refused to vacate the nondissemination order, although he acknowledged that portions of the existing order were arguably vague or overly broad and replaced it with a narrower version. The ruling preserved restrictions on statements that were substantially likely to materially prejudice the proceedings while allowing the press to continue independently reporting on the case. In effect, Kohberger’s position was that the media could cover the prosecution as aggressively as it wanted, but prosecutors, defense lawyers, police and other participants should not be allowed to litigate the case through the press before a jury was ever selected.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2790</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The Media Motion To Intervene In The Bryan Kohberger Trial (8/7/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-media-motion-to-intervene-in-the-bryan-kohberger-trial-8-7-26--73624017</link><description><![CDATA[The Associated Press, joined by a coalition of roughly 20 news organizations, moved to intervene in the Bryan Kohberger case in May 2023 as the fight over public access and the sweeping gag order surrounding the proceedings intensified. The media coalition argued that the nondissemination order imposed on attorneys, law-enforcement personnel and others connected to the case was so broad that it interfered with the press and public’s First Amendment rights to gather information about one of the most closely watched murder prosecutions in the country. The AP was joined by organizations including The New York Times, The Washington Post, the Seattle Times, the Idaho Press Club, The Spokesman-Review, EastIdahoNews.com and several television organizations. Their motion was not an attempt to become a party to the murder prosecution itself or weigh in on Kohberger’s guilt or innocence. Instead, the organizations wanted standing to challenge restrictions that they believed unnecessarily prevented journalists from obtaining information from people connected to the case. They argued that protecting Kohberger’s right to a fair trial was important, but that the court also had to consider the constitutional interests of the press and the public rather than automatically allowing secrecy to dominate the proceedings.<br /><br />Judge John Judge ultimately granted the media coalition permission to intervene for the limited purpose of challenging the nondissemination order, allowing the AP and the other organizations to formally make their arguments before the court. The dispute became part of a much larger battle over how much access journalists should have to the Kohberger proceedings, including later fights over cameras inside the courtroom. The media organizations repeatedly maintained that extensive publicity surrounding the murders did not eliminate the public’s constitutional interest in observing and reporting on the judicial process, while Kohberger’s defense argued that uncontrolled publicity threatened his ability to receive a fair trial. The court attempted to balance those competing interests rather than giving either side unlimited authority, and the media coalition’s intervention ensured that the press had its own lawyers arguing directly for access instead of depending upon prosecutors or the defense to protect those interests. Later in 2023, the coalition again sought to intervene when Kohberger asked the court to remove cameras, although the court ruled that the AP did not have an automatic right to intervene at that particular stage and instead permitted the coalition to participate as an interested media group. The fight illustrated how the Kohberger prosecution was being litigated on two parallel tracks: the criminal case itself and an unusually intense constitutional battle over secrecy, cameras, pretrial publicity and how much of the case the public would actually be permitted to see.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73624017</guid><pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73624017/megamediaintervenemoscow.mp3" length="22563988" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b1499bfc-fc78-4e2f-8216-ed35a8bac060/b1499bfc-fc78-4e2f-8216-ed35a8bac060.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b1499bfc-fc78-4e2f-8216-ed35a8bac060/b1499bfc-fc78-4e2f-8216-ed35a8bac060.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b1499bfc-fc78-4e2f-8216-ed35a8bac060/b1499bfc-fc78-4e2f-8216-ed35a8bac060.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Associated Press, joined by a coalition of roughly 20 news organizations, moved to intervene in the Bryan Kohberger case in May 2023 as the fight over public access and the sweeping gag order surrounding the proceedings intensified. The media...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Associated Press, joined by a coalition of roughly 20 news organizations, moved to intervene in the Bryan Kohberger case in May 2023 as the fight over public access and the sweeping gag order surrounding the proceedings intensified. The media coalition argued that the nondissemination order imposed on attorneys, law-enforcement personnel and others connected to the case was so broad that it interfered with the press and public’s First Amendment rights to gather information about one of the most closely watched murder prosecutions in the country. The AP was joined by organizations including The New York Times, The Washington Post, the Seattle Times, the Idaho Press Club, The Spokesman-Review, EastIdahoNews.com and several television organizations. Their motion was not an attempt to become a party to the murder prosecution itself or weigh in on Kohberger’s guilt or innocence. Instead, the organizations wanted standing to challenge restrictions that they believed unnecessarily prevented journalists from obtaining information from people connected to the case. They argued that protecting Kohberger’s right to a fair trial was important, but that the court also had to consider the constitutional interests of the press and the public rather than automatically allowing secrecy to dominate the proceedings.<br /><br />Judge John Judge ultimately granted the media coalition permission to intervene for the limited purpose of challenging the nondissemination order, allowing the AP and the other organizations to formally make their arguments before the court. The dispute became part of a much larger battle over how much access journalists should have to the Kohberger proceedings, including later fights over cameras inside the courtroom. The media organizations repeatedly maintained that extensive publicity surrounding the murders did not eliminate the public’s constitutional interest in observing and reporting on the judicial process, while Kohberger’s defense argued that uncontrolled publicity threatened his ability to receive a fair trial. The court attempted to balance those competing interests rather than giving either side unlimited authority, and the media coalition’s intervention ensured that the press had its own lawyers arguing directly for access instead of depending upon prosecutors or the defense to protect those interests. Later in 2023, the coalition again sought to intervene when Kohberger asked the court to remove cameras, although the court ruled that the AP did not have an automatic right to intervene at that particular stage and instead permitted the coalition to participate as an interested media group. The fight illustrated how the Kohberger prosecution was being litigated on two parallel tracks: the criminal case itself and an unusually intense constitutional battle over secrecy, cameras, pretrial publicity and how much of the case the public would actually be permitted to see.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1411</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Judge Hippler's Order On Bryan Kohberger's Capital Punishment Motions (Part 1)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/judge-hippler-s-order-on-bryan-kohberger-s-capital-punishment-motions-part-1--73395953</link><description><![CDATA[In State v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, Judge Steven Hippler issued a Memorandum Decision and Order addressing multiple defense motions aimed at removing the death penalty as a sentencing option. The defense presented 12 motions challenging various aspects of Idaho's capital punishment framework, including the constitutionality of execution methods and the applicability of certain aggravating factors. After thorough consideration, Judge Hippler denied all motions, affirming that the death penalty remains a viable sentencing option in this case.<br /><br />The court's 55-page decision systematically addressed each defense argument, referencing precedents set by the Idaho Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court that uphold the constitutionality of capital punishment. Judge Hippler concluded that the defense's claims did not warrant the removal of the death penalty, allowing the prosecution to continue seeking it as a potential sentence. This ruling signifies a pivotal moment in the proceedings, underscoring the court's commitment to adhering to established legal standards in capital cases. <br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/isc.coi/CR01-24-31665/2024/112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73395953</guid><pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73395953/moscowdeathpenaltyorder1.mp3" length="14609389" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ef8e1cd2-9853-471b-a777-79f0650288b6/ef8e1cd2-9853-471b-a777-79f0650288b6.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ef8e1cd2-9853-471b-a777-79f0650288b6/ef8e1cd2-9853-471b-a777-79f0650288b6.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ef8e1cd2-9853-471b-a777-79f0650288b6/ef8e1cd2-9853-471b-a777-79f0650288b6.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In State v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, Judge Steven Hippler issued a Memorandum Decision and Order addressing multiple defense motions aimed at removing the death penalty as a sentencing option. The defense presented 12 motions...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In State v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, Judge Steven Hippler issued a Memorandum Decision and Order addressing multiple defense motions aimed at removing the death penalty as a sentencing option. The defense presented 12 motions challenging various aspects of Idaho's capital punishment framework, including the constitutionality of execution methods and the applicability of certain aggravating factors. After thorough consideration, Judge Hippler denied all motions, affirming that the death penalty remains a viable sentencing option in this case.<br /><br />The court's 55-page decision systematically addressed each defense argument, referencing precedents set by the Idaho Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court that uphold the constitutionality of capital punishment. Judge Hippler concluded that the defense's claims did not warrant the removal of the death penalty, allowing the prosecution to continue seeking it as a potential sentence. This ruling signifies a pivotal moment in the proceedings, underscoring the court's commitment to adhering to established legal standards in capital cases. <br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/isc.coi/CR01-24-31665/2024/112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>914</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Kathy Ruemmler And Her Epstein Related Transcript From Her Trip To Congress (Part 6) (8/6/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/kathy-ruemmler-and-her-epstein-related-transcript-from-her-trip-to-congress-part-6-8-6-26--73511687</link><description><![CDATA[Kathy Ruemmler told congressional investigators that she regretted associating with Jeffrey Epstein but maintained that she did not know he was continuing to abuse girls and young women after his 2008 conviction. The former Obama White House counsel acknowledged meeting with Epstein repeatedly, visiting his properties, exchanging numerous emails with him and accepting professional assistance and gifts, while portraying the relationship as largely intellectual and social. She said Epstein introduced her to prominent figures and discussed legal, political and financial matters with her, but denied representing him in criminal matters or helping conceal his misconduct. Ruemmler also argued that Epstein had misled her about the seriousness of his past crimes, an explanation that left investigators questioning why an experienced former federal prosecutor remained close to a registered sex offender.<br /><br />The most damaging portion of Ruemmler’s testimony concerned Virginia Giuffre. Ruemmler said some of Giuffre’s allegations “lacked inherent credibility” and was questioned about a 2015 email in which she discussed whether counterclaims could be brought against Giuffre while Giuffre was suing Ghislaine Maxwell. Ruemmler claimed she did not remember the message and suggested she may merely have been responding conversationally to Epstein rather than actively developing a legal strategy against Giuffre. She said she had no reason to doubt that Giuffre had been abused, yet stopped short of affirming that Epstein and Maxwell had victimized her. Taken together, the testimony showed Ruemmler attempting to minimize her role and distance herself from Epstein while struggling to explain why she maintained such a close relationship with him and appeared willing to question one of his most prominent accusers.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Ruemmler-Final-Transcript_Redact-7.28.26.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ruemmler-Final-Transcript_Redact-7.28.26.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73511687</guid><pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 02:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73511687/ruemmler6.mp3" length="13773471" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/524b2233-01cb-4a82-85e3-e2366e09ff17/524b2233-01cb-4a82-85e3-e2366e09ff17.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/524b2233-01cb-4a82-85e3-e2366e09ff17/524b2233-01cb-4a82-85e3-e2366e09ff17.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/524b2233-01cb-4a82-85e3-e2366e09ff17/524b2233-01cb-4a82-85e3-e2366e09ff17.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Kathy Ruemmler told congressional investigators that she regretted associating with Jeffrey Epstein but maintained that she did not know he was continuing to abuse girls and young women after his 2008 conviction. The former Obama White House counsel...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Kathy Ruemmler told congressional investigators that she regretted associating with Jeffrey Epstein but maintained that she did not know he was continuing to abuse girls and young women after his 2008 conviction. The former Obama White House counsel acknowledged meeting with Epstein repeatedly, visiting his properties, exchanging numerous emails with him and accepting professional assistance and gifts, while portraying the relationship as largely intellectual and social. She said Epstein introduced her to prominent figures and discussed legal, political and financial matters with her, but denied representing him in criminal matters or helping conceal his misconduct. Ruemmler also argued that Epstein had misled her about the seriousness of his past crimes, an explanation that left investigators questioning why an experienced former federal prosecutor remained close to a registered sex offender.<br /><br />The most damaging portion of Ruemmler’s testimony concerned Virginia Giuffre. Ruemmler said some of Giuffre’s allegations “lacked inherent credibility” and was questioned about a 2015 email in which she discussed whether counterclaims could be brought against Giuffre while Giuffre was suing Ghislaine Maxwell. Ruemmler claimed she did not remember the message and suggested she may merely have been responding conversationally to Epstein rather than actively developing a legal strategy against Giuffre. She said she had no reason to doubt that Giuffre had been abused, yet stopped short of affirming that Epstein and Maxwell had victimized her. Taken together, the testimony showed Ruemmler attempting to minimize her role and distance herself from Epstein while struggling to explain why she maintained such a close relationship with him and appeared willing to question one of his most prominent accusers.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Ruemmler-Final-Transcript_Redact-7.28.26.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ruemmler-Final-Transcript_Redact-7.28.26.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>861</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Kathy Ruemmler And Her Epstein Related Transcript From Her Trip To Congress (Part 5) (8/6/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/kathy-ruemmler-and-her-epstein-related-transcript-from-her-trip-to-congress-part-5-8-6-26--73511686</link><description><![CDATA[Kathy Ruemmler told congressional investigators that she regretted associating with Jeffrey Epstein but maintained that she did not know he was continuing to abuse girls and young women after his 2008 conviction. The former Obama White House counsel acknowledged meeting with Epstein repeatedly, visiting his properties, exchanging numerous emails with him and accepting professional assistance and gifts, while portraying the relationship as largely intellectual and social. She said Epstein introduced her to prominent figures and discussed legal, political and financial matters with her, but denied representing him in criminal matters or helping conceal his misconduct. Ruemmler also argued that Epstein had misled her about the seriousness of his past crimes, an explanation that left investigators questioning why an experienced former federal prosecutor remained close to a registered sex offender.<br /><br />The most damaging portion of Ruemmler’s testimony concerned Virginia Giuffre. Ruemmler said some of Giuffre’s allegations “lacked inherent credibility” and was questioned about a 2015 email in which she discussed whether counterclaims could be brought against Giuffre while Giuffre was suing Ghislaine Maxwell. Ruemmler claimed she did not remember the message and suggested she may merely have been responding conversationally to Epstein rather than actively developing a legal strategy against Giuffre. She said she had no reason to doubt that Giuffre had been abused, yet stopped short of affirming that Epstein and Maxwell had victimized her. Taken together, the testimony showed Ruemmler attempting to minimize her role and distance herself from Epstein while struggling to explain why she maintained such a close relationship with him and appeared willing to question one of his most prominent accusers.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Ruemmler-Final-Transcript_Redact-7.28.26.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ruemmler-Final-Transcript_Redact-7.28.26.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73511686</guid><pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 00:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73511686/ruemmler5.mp3" length="12009683" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/69063650-3ed0-4864-b239-ff30f0556d2f/69063650-3ed0-4864-b239-ff30f0556d2f.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/69063650-3ed0-4864-b239-ff30f0556d2f/69063650-3ed0-4864-b239-ff30f0556d2f.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/69063650-3ed0-4864-b239-ff30f0556d2f/69063650-3ed0-4864-b239-ff30f0556d2f.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Kathy Ruemmler told congressional investigators that she regretted associating with Jeffrey Epstein but maintained that she did not know he was continuing to abuse girls and young women after his 2008 conviction. The former Obama White House counsel...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Kathy Ruemmler told congressional investigators that she regretted associating with Jeffrey Epstein but maintained that she did not know he was continuing to abuse girls and young women after his 2008 conviction. The former Obama White House counsel acknowledged meeting with Epstein repeatedly, visiting his properties, exchanging numerous emails with him and accepting professional assistance and gifts, while portraying the relationship as largely intellectual and social. She said Epstein introduced her to prominent figures and discussed legal, political and financial matters with her, but denied representing him in criminal matters or helping conceal his misconduct. Ruemmler also argued that Epstein had misled her about the seriousness of his past crimes, an explanation that left investigators questioning why an experienced former federal prosecutor remained close to a registered sex offender.<br /><br />The most damaging portion of Ruemmler’s testimony concerned Virginia Giuffre. Ruemmler said some of Giuffre’s allegations “lacked inherent credibility” and was questioned about a 2015 email in which she discussed whether counterclaims could be brought against Giuffre while Giuffre was suing Ghislaine Maxwell. Ruemmler claimed she did not remember the message and suggested she may merely have been responding conversationally to Epstein rather than actively developing a legal strategy against Giuffre. She said she had no reason to doubt that Giuffre had been abused, yet stopped short of affirming that Epstein and Maxwell had victimized her. Taken together, the testimony showed Ruemmler attempting to minimize her role and distance herself from Epstein while struggling to explain why she maintained such a close relationship with him and appeared willing to question one of his most prominent accusers.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Ruemmler-Final-Transcript_Redact-7.28.26.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ruemmler-Final-Transcript_Redact-7.28.26.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>751</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Tyler Robinson Challenges Graphic Video Ahead of Disqualification Hearing (8/7/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-challenges-graphic-video-ahead-of-disqualification-hearing-8-7-26--73567272</link><description><![CDATA[Tyler Robinson’s attorneys filed an objection to the prosecution’s proposed Exhibit 4.1, a close-range color video with audio showing the shooting of Charlie Kirk. Prosecutors intended to introduce the video during a February 3, 2026, hearing on Robinson’s motion to disqualify the Utah County Attorney’s Office. The defense argued that the footage had no relevance to the actual issue before the court: whether a conflict of interest existed because a family member of someone on the prosecution team had reportedly witnessed the shooting at Utah Valley University. Robinson’s lawyers said still photographs and diagrams already showed Kirk’s position, the audience and the witness’s alleged location, making the graphic video unnecessary under Utah’s evidentiary rules.<br /><br />The defense also argued that publicly playing the footage during a televised hearing would create enormous unfair prejudice and threaten Robinson’s constitutional right to an impartial jury in a capital case. His attorneys described the video as graphic, disturbing and likely to be immediately circulated nationally and internationally, further intensifying pretrial publicity surrounding the case. They also criticized media coverage that focused on close-up images of Robinson and speculation about his facial expressions or conversations with counsel. The filing asked Judge Tony F. Graf Jr. to exclude the video entirely, prevent it from being publicly displayed and, should the court admit it, keep it sealed until trial.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/988917434/Tyler-Robinson-court-filing-Jan-27" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Tyler Robinson Court Filing, Jan. 27 | PDF | Relevance (Law) | Legal Procedure</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73567272</guid><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 22:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73567272/robinsonobjectionexhibit4.mp3" length="10544736" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6b1f8a26-4f3e-4076-88a0-9e9650c7ce64/6b1f8a26-4f3e-4076-88a0-9e9650c7ce64.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6b1f8a26-4f3e-4076-88a0-9e9650c7ce64/6b1f8a26-4f3e-4076-88a0-9e9650c7ce64.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6b1f8a26-4f3e-4076-88a0-9e9650c7ce64/6b1f8a26-4f3e-4076-88a0-9e9650c7ce64.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Tyler Robinson’s attorneys filed an objection to the prosecution’s proposed Exhibit 4.1, a close-range color video with audio showing the shooting of Charlie Kirk. Prosecutors intended to introduce the video during a February 3, 2026, hearing on...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Tyler Robinson’s attorneys filed an objection to the prosecution’s proposed Exhibit 4.1, a close-range color video with audio showing the shooting of Charlie Kirk. Prosecutors intended to introduce the video during a February 3, 2026, hearing on Robinson’s motion to disqualify the Utah County Attorney’s Office. The defense argued that the footage had no relevance to the actual issue before the court: whether a conflict of interest existed because a family member of someone on the prosecution team had reportedly witnessed the shooting at Utah Valley University. Robinson’s lawyers said still photographs and diagrams already showed Kirk’s position, the audience and the witness’s alleged location, making the graphic video unnecessary under Utah’s evidentiary rules.<br /><br />The defense also argued that publicly playing the footage during a televised hearing would create enormous unfair prejudice and threaten Robinson’s constitutional right to an impartial jury in a capital case. His attorneys described the video as graphic, disturbing and likely to be immediately circulated nationally and internationally, further intensifying pretrial publicity surrounding the case. They also criticized media coverage that focused on close-up images of Robinson and speculation about his facial expressions or conversations with counsel. The filing asked Judge Tony F. Graf Jr. to exclude the video entirely, prevent it from being publicly displayed and, should the court admit it, keep it sealed until trial.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/988917434/Tyler-Robinson-court-filing-Jan-27" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Tyler Robinson Court Filing, Jan. 27 | PDF | Relevance (Law) | Legal Procedure</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>660</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Murder In Moscow:   The Long Legal Road Behind Kohberger’s Latest Filing (Part 3) (8/7/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-the-long-legal-road-behind-kohberger-s-latest-filing-part-3-8-7-26--73630093</link><description><![CDATA[Bryan Kohberger pleaded guilty in July 2025 to murdering University of Idaho students Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin, avoiding the death penalty in exchange for four consecutive life sentences without parole. The agreement ended years of litigation over DNA found on a knife sheath, surveillance footage of a white Hyundai Elantra, cellphone records, witness testimony, genetic genealogy, and other evidence prosecutors said connected him to the King Road residence. During the plea hearing, Kohberger told the court that he understood the charges, was satisfied with his attorneys, was acting voluntarily, and was pleading guilty because he was guilty. The deal spared the victims’ families from a lengthy capital trial, but it did not answer the lingering questions about motive, the missing murder weapon, or why the four students were targeted.<br /><br />Kohberger is now seeking post-conviction relief and asking the court to allow him to withdraw those guilty pleas. He claims his former attorneys pressured him into falsely confessing, misled him about death-row and prison conditions, provided ineffective representation, and failed to properly disclose or explain potentially exculpatory evidence. His newly appointed attorney, Greg Rauch, is reviewing those allegations, while Idaho prosecutors are defending the convictions and emphasizing Kohberger’s sworn courtroom admissions and the substantial evidence against him. The court has not ruled that his claims are credible, and Kohberger must meet the demanding post-sentencing standard of proving a manifest injustice. Even if he succeeds, he would not be released automatically, because the murder charges could return, the case could proceed to trial, and prosecutors might seek to restore the death penalty.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73630093</guid><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 20:30:05 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73630093/kohbergerstatus3.mp3" length="11438333" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/bead4b82-8e43-49f2-8031-b2f62142b90d/bead4b82-8e43-49f2-8031-b2f62142b90d.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/bead4b82-8e43-49f2-8031-b2f62142b90d/bead4b82-8e43-49f2-8031-b2f62142b90d.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/bead4b82-8e43-49f2-8031-b2f62142b90d/bead4b82-8e43-49f2-8031-b2f62142b90d.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Bryan Kohberger pleaded guilty in July 2025 to murdering University of Idaho students Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin, avoiding the death penalty in exchange for four consecutive life sentences without parole. The...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Bryan Kohberger pleaded guilty in July 2025 to murdering University of Idaho students Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin, avoiding the death penalty in exchange for four consecutive life sentences without parole. The agreement ended years of litigation over DNA found on a knife sheath, surveillance footage of a white Hyundai Elantra, cellphone records, witness testimony, genetic genealogy, and other evidence prosecutors said connected him to the King Road residence. During the plea hearing, Kohberger told the court that he understood the charges, was satisfied with his attorneys, was acting voluntarily, and was pleading guilty because he was guilty. The deal spared the victims’ families from a lengthy capital trial, but it did not answer the lingering questions about motive, the missing murder weapon, or why the four students were targeted.<br /><br />Kohberger is now seeking post-conviction relief and asking the court to allow him to withdraw those guilty pleas. He claims his former attorneys pressured him into falsely confessing, misled him about death-row and prison conditions, provided ineffective representation, and failed to properly disclose or explain potentially exculpatory evidence. His newly appointed attorney, Greg Rauch, is reviewing those allegations, while Idaho prosecutors are defending the convictions and emphasizing Kohberger’s sworn courtroom admissions and the substantial evidence against him. The court has not ruled that his claims are credible, and Kohberger must meet the demanding post-sentencing standard of proving a manifest injustice. Even if he succeeds, he would not be released automatically, because the murder charges could return, the case could proceed to trial, and prosecutors might seek to restore the death penalty.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>715</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Money Machine Behind Jeffrey Epstein (Part 2) (8/7/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-money-machine-behind-jeffrey-epstein-part-2-8-7-26--73567270</link><description><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein’s criminal enterprise did not survive for decades because he acted alone or possessed some supernatural ability to evade scrutiny. It survived because major financial institutions continued to provide the banking services, cash access, wire transfers, private banking relationships, and institutional legitimacy that allowed his operation to function. JPMorgan maintained Epstein as a client for years after his abuse had become publicly known, while Deutsche Bank accepted him after his relationship with JPMorgan ended. Both institutions later paid substantial settlements connected to claims that their services helped facilitate Epstein’s trafficking operation, yet those payments did not produce a full public accounting of who approved the relationships, who ignored internal warnings, or why compliance concerns repeatedly lost out to profit and influence.<br /><br /><br />The continued lack of individual accountability within the financial sector remains one of the greatest failures of the Epstein case. Corporate settlements compensated survivors and acknowledged the seriousness of the allegations, but they also allowed executives and institutions to avoid public trials that could have exposed the full financial architecture of Epstein’s network. Banks cannot claim to be leaders in fighting human trafficking while treating wealthy, connected predators as exceptions to their own safeguards. Real justice requires subpoenas, testimony under oath, disclosure of internal communications, clawbacks of executive compensation, and criminal consequences where the evidence supports them. Until the bankers, executives, advisers, and institutions that enabled Epstein’s access to money and legitimacy are fully investigated, the public will continue receiving settlements instead of answers and carefully managed apologies instead of accountability.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73567270</guid><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 18:30:05 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73567270/epsteinhelpedbywallstreet2.mp3" length="13128977" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/644d4a8f-cd0b-4b03-9fd8-a2c0678fd79f/644d4a8f-cd0b-4b03-9fd8-a2c0678fd79f.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/644d4a8f-cd0b-4b03-9fd8-a2c0678fd79f/644d4a8f-cd0b-4b03-9fd8-a2c0678fd79f.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/644d4a8f-cd0b-4b03-9fd8-a2c0678fd79f/644d4a8f-cd0b-4b03-9fd8-a2c0678fd79f.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jeffrey Epstein’s criminal enterprise did not survive for decades because he acted alone or possessed some supernatural ability to evade scrutiny. It survived because major financial institutions continued to provide the banking services, cash access,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein’s criminal enterprise did not survive for decades because he acted alone or possessed some supernatural ability to evade scrutiny. It survived because major financial institutions continued to provide the banking services, cash access, wire transfers, private banking relationships, and institutional legitimacy that allowed his operation to function. JPMorgan maintained Epstein as a client for years after his abuse had become publicly known, while Deutsche Bank accepted him after his relationship with JPMorgan ended. Both institutions later paid substantial settlements connected to claims that their services helped facilitate Epstein’s trafficking operation, yet those payments did not produce a full public accounting of who approved the relationships, who ignored internal warnings, or why compliance concerns repeatedly lost out to profit and influence.<br /><br /><br />The continued lack of individual accountability within the financial sector remains one of the greatest failures of the Epstein case. Corporate settlements compensated survivors and acknowledged the seriousness of the allegations, but they also allowed executives and institutions to avoid public trials that could have exposed the full financial architecture of Epstein’s network. Banks cannot claim to be leaders in fighting human trafficking while treating wealthy, connected predators as exceptions to their own safeguards. Real justice requires subpoenas, testimony under oath, disclosure of internal communications, clawbacks of executive compensation, and criminal consequences where the evidence supports them. Until the bankers, executives, advisers, and institutions that enabled Epstein’s access to money and legitimacy are fully investigated, the public will continue receiving settlements instead of answers and carefully managed apologies instead of accountability.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>821</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Money Machine Behind Jeffrey Epstein (Part 1) (8/7/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-money-machine-behind-jeffrey-epstein-part-1-8-7-26--73567267</link><description><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein’s criminal enterprise did not survive for decades because he acted alone or possessed some supernatural ability to evade scrutiny. It survived because major financial institutions continued to provide the banking services, cash access, wire transfers, private banking relationships, and institutional legitimacy that allowed his operation to function. JPMorgan maintained Epstein as a client for years after his abuse had become publicly known, while Deutsche Bank accepted him after his relationship with JPMorgan ended. Both institutions later paid substantial settlements connected to claims that their services helped facilitate Epstein’s trafficking operation, yet those payments did not produce a full public accounting of who approved the relationships, who ignored internal warnings, or why compliance concerns repeatedly lost out to profit and influence.<br /><br /><br />The continued lack of individual accountability within the financial sector remains one of the greatest failures of the Epstein case. Corporate settlements compensated survivors and acknowledged the seriousness of the allegations, but they also allowed executives and institutions to avoid public trials that could have exposed the full financial architecture of Epstein’s network. Banks cannot claim to be leaders in fighting human trafficking while treating wealthy, connected predators as exceptions to their own safeguards. Real justice requires subpoenas, testimony under oath, disclosure of internal communications, clawbacks of executive compensation, and criminal consequences where the evidence supports them. Until the bankers, executives, advisers, and institutions that enabled Epstein’s access to money and legitimacy are fully investigated, the public will continue receiving settlements instead of answers and carefully managed apologies instead of accountability.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73567267</guid><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 16:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73567267/epsteinhelpedbywallstreet1.mp3" length="11500191" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c299692f-fb23-4e5b-a27c-2b8f1af24b54/c299692f-fb23-4e5b-a27c-2b8f1af24b54.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c299692f-fb23-4e5b-a27c-2b8f1af24b54/c299692f-fb23-4e5b-a27c-2b8f1af24b54.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c299692f-fb23-4e5b-a27c-2b8f1af24b54/c299692f-fb23-4e5b-a27c-2b8f1af24b54.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jeffrey Epstein’s criminal enterprise did not survive for decades because he acted alone or possessed some supernatural ability to evade scrutiny. It survived because major financial institutions continued to provide the banking services, cash access,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein’s criminal enterprise did not survive for decades because he acted alone or possessed some supernatural ability to evade scrutiny. It survived because major financial institutions continued to provide the banking services, cash access, wire transfers, private banking relationships, and institutional legitimacy that allowed his operation to function. JPMorgan maintained Epstein as a client for years after his abuse had become publicly known, while Deutsche Bank accepted him after his relationship with JPMorgan ended. Both institutions later paid substantial settlements connected to claims that their services helped facilitate Epstein’s trafficking operation, yet those payments did not produce a full public accounting of who approved the relationships, who ignored internal warnings, or why compliance concerns repeatedly lost out to profit and influence.<br /><br /><br />The continued lack of individual accountability within the financial sector remains one of the greatest failures of the Epstein case. Corporate settlements compensated survivors and acknowledged the seriousness of the allegations, but they also allowed executives and institutions to avoid public trials that could have exposed the full financial architecture of Epstein’s network. Banks cannot claim to be leaders in fighting human trafficking while treating wealthy, connected predators as exceptions to their own safeguards. Real justice requires subpoenas, testimony under oath, disclosure of internal communications, clawbacks of executive compensation, and criminal consequences where the evidence supports them. Until the bankers, executives, advisers, and institutions that enabled Epstein’s access to money and legitimacy are fully investigated, the public will continue receiving settlements instead of answers and carefully managed apologies instead of accountability.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>719</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Federal Regulators Pressed to Examine Epstein’s Financial Network (8/7/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/federal-regulators-pressed-to-examine-epstein-s-financial-network-8-7-26--73583208</link><description><![CDATA[Senator Ron Wyden called on federal regulators to investigate Bank of America, Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan Chase over their handling of Jeffrey Epstein’s financial accounts, alleging that the banks may have failed to identify and report suspicious transactions quickly enough. Wyden’s findings followed a four-year investigation drawing on suspicious activity reports, court records, lawsuits and information obtained from the Treasury Department and financial institutions. His report alleged that Bank of America failed to properly screen and report roughly $170 million in payments to Epstein, while Deutsche Bank allegedly delayed reporting more than $250 million in suspicious wire transfers, including payments to women in Russia and other parts of Eastern Europe.<br /><br /><br />Wyden also accused JPMorgan of delaying reports concerning more than $1 billion in Epstein-linked transfers, including payments involving women in Russia and Belarus. JPMorgan rejected that allegation, saying it had flagged suspicious activity as early as 2002 and continued reporting concerns even after ending its relationship with Epstein in 2013. Bank of America denied facilitating wrongdoing, while Deutsche Bank expressed regret over its historical relationship with Epstein and said it had cooperated with regulators and strengthened its controls. Reuters noted that it had not independently verified the details of Wyden’s report, while the Treasury Department declined to say whether any investigation was underway.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source<br /><br /><a href="https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-senator-wyden-urges-regulators-probe-wall-street-banks-over-epstein-accounts-2026-08-04/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">US Senator Wyden urges regulators to probe Wall Street banks over Epstein accounts | Reuters</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73583208</guid><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 14:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73583208/wydenepsteinmoneytrail.mp3" length="10194068" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a5f55528-4ddc-4ea8-8f9b-9b344752e0de/a5f55528-4ddc-4ea8-8f9b-9b344752e0de.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a5f55528-4ddc-4ea8-8f9b-9b344752e0de/a5f55528-4ddc-4ea8-8f9b-9b344752e0de.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a5f55528-4ddc-4ea8-8f9b-9b344752e0de/a5f55528-4ddc-4ea8-8f9b-9b344752e0de.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Senator Ron Wyden called on federal regulators to investigate Bank of America, Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan Chase over their handling of Jeffrey Epstein’s financial accounts, alleging that the banks may have failed to identify and report suspicious...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Senator Ron Wyden called on federal regulators to investigate Bank of America, Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan Chase over their handling of Jeffrey Epstein’s financial accounts, alleging that the banks may have failed to identify and report suspicious transactions quickly enough. Wyden’s findings followed a four-year investigation drawing on suspicious activity reports, court records, lawsuits and information obtained from the Treasury Department and financial institutions. His report alleged that Bank of America failed to properly screen and report roughly $170 million in payments to Epstein, while Deutsche Bank allegedly delayed reporting more than $250 million in suspicious wire transfers, including payments to women in Russia and other parts of Eastern Europe.<br /><br /><br />Wyden also accused JPMorgan of delaying reports concerning more than $1 billion in Epstein-linked transfers, including payments involving women in Russia and Belarus. JPMorgan rejected that allegation, saying it had flagged suspicious activity as early as 2002 and continued reporting concerns even after ending its relationship with Epstein in 2013. Bank of America denied facilitating wrongdoing, while Deutsche Bank expressed regret over its historical relationship with Epstein and said it had cooperated with regulators and strengthened its controls. Reuters noted that it had not independently verified the details of Wyden’s report, while the Treasury Department declined to say whether any investigation was underway.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source<br /><br /><a href="https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-senator-wyden-urges-regulators-probe-wall-street-banks-over-epstein-accounts-2026-08-04/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">US Senator Wyden urges regulators to probe Wall Street banks over Epstein accounts | Reuters</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>638</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>New Mexico Sues the DOJ And Todd Blanche Over Epstein Records (8/7/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/new-mexico-sues-the-doj-and-todd-blanche-over-epstein-records-8-7-26--73567269</link><description><![CDATA[New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez filed a federal lawsuit against the Justice Department and acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, accusing them of obstructing the state’s renewed investigation into crimes allegedly committed at Jeffrey Epstein’s Zorro Ranch. Torrez said his office had repeatedly requested complete, unredacted federal records that could identify additional victims, witnesses and possible co-conspirators, but the DOJ provided only 31 pages, mostly consisting of news clippings and correspondence already possessed by the state. The lawsuit argued that the federal government’s refusal was especially damaging because New Mexico might be one of the few remaining jurisdictions capable of prosecuting Epstein associates under state law.<br /><br />The dispute also revived questions about the federal government’s earlier handling of Zorro Ranch. New Mexico officials said their original 2019 investigation had been suspended at the request of federal prosecutors, who allegedly promised to share evidence but never delivered meaningful assistance or searched the property. After reopening the investigation in February 2026, state authorities sought records connected to thousands of references to New Mexico and the ranch in the broader Epstein files. The DOJ maintained that it had cooperated within the limits imposed by victim-privacy protections and court orders, while Torrez asked a federal judge to declare the withholding unlawful and compel Blanche’s department to provide the requested materials.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/jeffrey-epstein-investigation-new-mexico-sues-doj-todd-blanche-blockin-rcna591015" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jeffrey Epstein investigation: New Mexico sues DOJ, Todd Blanche for blocking state probe</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73567269</guid><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 12:30:05 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73567269/newmexicosuesdojepsteinfiles.mp3" length="12867753" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c0756ddc-0185-4d84-aef0-a215ff4c4a30/c0756ddc-0185-4d84-aef0-a215ff4c4a30.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c0756ddc-0185-4d84-aef0-a215ff4c4a30/c0756ddc-0185-4d84-aef0-a215ff4c4a30.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c0756ddc-0185-4d84-aef0-a215ff4c4a30/c0756ddc-0185-4d84-aef0-a215ff4c4a30.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez filed a federal lawsuit against the Justice Department and acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, accusing them of obstructing the state’s renewed investigation into crimes allegedly committed at Jeffrey...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez filed a federal lawsuit against the Justice Department and acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, accusing them of obstructing the state’s renewed investigation into crimes allegedly committed at Jeffrey Epstein’s Zorro Ranch. Torrez said his office had repeatedly requested complete, unredacted federal records that could identify additional victims, witnesses and possible co-conspirators, but the DOJ provided only 31 pages, mostly consisting of news clippings and correspondence already possessed by the state. The lawsuit argued that the federal government’s refusal was especially damaging because New Mexico might be one of the few remaining jurisdictions capable of prosecuting Epstein associates under state law.<br /><br />The dispute also revived questions about the federal government’s earlier handling of Zorro Ranch. New Mexico officials said their original 2019 investigation had been suspended at the request of federal prosecutors, who allegedly promised to share evidence but never delivered meaningful assistance or searched the property. After reopening the investigation in February 2026, state authorities sought records connected to thousands of references to New Mexico and the ranch in the broader Epstein files. The DOJ maintained that it had cooperated within the limits imposed by victim-privacy protections and court orders, while Torrez asked a federal judge to declare the withholding unlawful and compel Blanche’s department to provide the requested materials.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/jeffrey-epstein-investigation-new-mexico-sues-doj-todd-blanche-blockin-rcna591015" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jeffrey Epstein investigation: New Mexico sues DOJ, Todd Blanche for blocking state probe</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>805</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Bryan Kohberger And The Case Against Him In Pennsylvania (8/8/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-the-case-against-him-in-pennsylvania-8-8-26--73564416</link><description><![CDATA[Pennsylvania authorities arrested Bryan Kohberger at his parents’ home in Monroe County during the early morning hours of December 30, 2022, after Idaho issued a warrant charging him with four counts of first-degree murder and one count of burglary in the deaths of Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. Documents later unsealed in Pennsylvania showed that investigators had sought evidence including knives, weapons, blood or other biological material, dark clothing, electronic devices, records connected to the victims and samples of Kohberger’s DNA. During the search, authorities seized multiple knives, a handgun, ammunition, black clothing, gloves, masks, electronic devices and other potential evidence, although the records did not establish that any of those items had been used in the killings. The warrants also revealed the scale of the operation conducted by Pennsylvania State Police and the FBI as they took Kohberger into custody and searched the family residence and his white Hyundai Elantra.<br /><br />Kohberger appeared in a Monroe County courtroom on January 3, 2023, and waived his right to contest extradition, voluntarily agreeing to be returned to Idaho to face the charges. By signing the waiver, he gave up the opportunity to force Idaho authorities to complete a longer formal extradition process and prove that he was the person named in the warrant. His Pennsylvania attorney said Kohberger expected to be exonerated, while officials explained that many details of the case would remain sealed until he appeared before a judge in Idaho. After the waiver was accepted, Pennsylvania authorized his transfer, and Kohberger was flown back to Idaho, where the probable-cause affidavit outlining the evidence against him was unsealed following his initial court appearance.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73564416</guid><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 10:30:05 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73564416/megapennunsealskohwarrantwaivesextracosttransport.mp3" length="35796576" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3672f3a6-7827-4bb2-9e05-473fab07c87d/3672f3a6-7827-4bb2-9e05-473fab07c87d.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3672f3a6-7827-4bb2-9e05-473fab07c87d/3672f3a6-7827-4bb2-9e05-473fab07c87d.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3672f3a6-7827-4bb2-9e05-473fab07c87d/3672f3a6-7827-4bb2-9e05-473fab07c87d.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Pennsylvania authorities arrested Bryan Kohberger at his parents’ home in Monroe County during the early morning hours of December 30, 2022, after Idaho issued a warrant charging him with four counts of first-degree murder and one count of burglary in...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Pennsylvania authorities arrested Bryan Kohberger at his parents’ home in Monroe County during the early morning hours of December 30, 2022, after Idaho issued a warrant charging him with four counts of first-degree murder and one count of burglary in the deaths of Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. Documents later unsealed in Pennsylvania showed that investigators had sought evidence including knives, weapons, blood or other biological material, dark clothing, electronic devices, records connected to the victims and samples of Kohberger’s DNA. During the search, authorities seized multiple knives, a handgun, ammunition, black clothing, gloves, masks, electronic devices and other potential evidence, although the records did not establish that any of those items had been used in the killings. The warrants also revealed the scale of the operation conducted by Pennsylvania State Police and the FBI as they took Kohberger into custody and searched the family residence and his white Hyundai Elantra.<br /><br />Kohberger appeared in a Monroe County courtroom on January 3, 2023, and waived his right to contest extradition, voluntarily agreeing to be returned to Idaho to face the charges. By signing the waiver, he gave up the opportunity to force Idaho authorities to complete a longer formal extradition process and prove that he was the person named in the warrant. His Pennsylvania attorney said Kohberger expected to be exonerated, while officials explained that many details of the case would remain sealed until he appeared before a judge in Idaho. After the waiver was accepted, Pennsylvania authorized his transfer, and Kohberger was flown back to Idaho, where the probable-cause affidavit outlining the evidence against him was unsealed following his initial court appearance.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2238</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Bryan Kohberger And The Drive From Washington State To Pennsylvania (8/8/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-the-drive-from-washington-state-to-pennsylvania-8-8-26--73564415</link><description><![CDATA[The cross-country drive Bryan Kohberger made from Pullman, Washington, to his family’s home in Pennsylvania became a major subject of speculation after his arrest. Kohberger’s father had flown west and joined him for the roughly 2,500-mile trip after the Washington State University semester ended in December 2022. At the time, the journey was described as a previously planned trip home for the holidays, but its timing, approximately one month after the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, led many observers to question whether Kohberger had been attempting to distance himself and his white Hyundai Elantra from the crime scene. The trip also raised questions about what Kohberger’s father knew, although there was no evidence that he had known his son was suspected of the killings or had helped him evade investigators.<br /><br />Attention intensified after it was revealed that Kohberger and his father had been stopped twice within minutes while traveling through Indiana on December 15, 2022, both times for allegedly following another vehicle too closely. Body-camera footage showed the pair explaining that they were traveling from Washington State University to Pennsylvania, while Kohberger’s father discussed a separate police incident that had occurred near the university. Early reports suggested the FBI might have directed local officers to stop the car so investigators could observe Kohberger, but the FBI later denied requesting or directing either stop, and local authorities said they had not known he was connected to the Idaho investigation. The drive ultimately became part of the broader narrative surrounding the case because it placed Kohberger, his father and the vehicle investigators were seeking on a highly scrutinized journey shortly before Kohberger was arrested at his parents’ Pennsylvania home.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to ocntact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73564415</guid><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73564415/megakohroutefromwashpennwithfather.mp3" length="29686431" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0681a812-4388-4bdc-81a5-7d308e466e38/0681a812-4388-4bdc-81a5-7d308e466e38.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0681a812-4388-4bdc-81a5-7d308e466e38/0681a812-4388-4bdc-81a5-7d308e466e38.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0681a812-4388-4bdc-81a5-7d308e466e38/0681a812-4388-4bdc-81a5-7d308e466e38.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The cross-country drive Bryan Kohberger made from Pullman, Washington, to his family’s home in Pennsylvania became a major subject of speculation after his arrest. Kohberger’s father had flown west and joined him for the roughly 2,500-mile trip after...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The cross-country drive Bryan Kohberger made from Pullman, Washington, to his family’s home in Pennsylvania became a major subject of speculation after his arrest. Kohberger’s father had flown west and joined him for the roughly 2,500-mile trip after the Washington State University semester ended in December 2022. At the time, the journey was described as a previously planned trip home for the holidays, but its timing, approximately one month after the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, led many observers to question whether Kohberger had been attempting to distance himself and his white Hyundai Elantra from the crime scene. The trip also raised questions about what Kohberger’s father knew, although there was no evidence that he had known his son was suspected of the killings or had helped him evade investigators.<br /><br />Attention intensified after it was revealed that Kohberger and his father had been stopped twice within minutes while traveling through Indiana on December 15, 2022, both times for allegedly following another vehicle too closely. Body-camera footage showed the pair explaining that they were traveling from Washington State University to Pennsylvania, while Kohberger’s father discussed a separate police incident that had occurred near the university. Early reports suggested the FBI might have directed local officers to stop the car so investigators could observe Kohberger, but the FBI later denied requesting or directing either stop, and local authorities said they had not known he was connected to the Idaho investigation. The drive ultimately became part of the broader narrative surrounding the case because it placed Kohberger, his father and the vehicle investigators were seeking on a highly scrutinized journey shortly before Kohberger was arrested at his parents’ Pennsylvania home.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to ocntact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1856</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Bryan Kohberger's Life In Lehigh Valley (8/7/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-s-life-in-lehigh-valley-8-7-26--73564062</link><description><![CDATA[<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />The investigation traced Bryan Kohberger’s largely unnoticed life before his arrest, beginning with his upbringing in Pennsylvania’s Pocono Mountains and continuing through his years at Northampton Community College and DeSales University in the Lehigh Valley. Former classmates and acquaintances had generally remembered him as quiet, socially awkward, observant and sometimes difficult to engage, but not as someone they believed was capable of extreme violence. He had blended into a region filled with college students, earned degrees in psychology and criminal justice, and studied under forensic psychologist Katherine Ramsland, who was known for her work involving serial killers. Authorities had found no known connection between Kohberger and unsolved crimes in the Lehigh Valley, although reports that he had made women uncomfortable at a Bethlehem brewery took on a more troubling meaning after his arrest.<br /><br />After moving west to pursue a doctorate in criminology at Washington State University, Kohberger had continued to appear isolated and socially awkward. A neighbor recalled that Kohberger had discussed the University of Idaho murders shortly after they occurred, commenting that police appeared to have no leads and speculating about the type of weapon and motive involved. The account emphasized that many of Kohberger’s interactions had seemed ordinary or merely strange at the time but appeared far more ominous in hindsight after investigators connected him to a white Hyundai Elantra and DNA recovered from the knife sheath found inside the King Road residence. The story ultimately portrayed a man who had spent years moving almost invisibly through schools, communities and social settings before suddenly becoming the central figure in one of the country’s most closely watched murder cases.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.lehighvalleylive.com/news/2023/03/bryan-kohbergers-life-under-the-radar-walking-in-the-footsteps-of-an-alleged-mass-murderer.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bryan Kohberger’s life under the radar: Walking in the footsteps of an alleged mass murderer - lehighvalleylive.com</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73564062</guid><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73564062/megakohlifelehighvalley.mp3" length="32823632" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/872d1b10-87f0-4ee6-8c3c-bec12e10f231/872d1b10-87f0-4ee6-8c3c-bec12e10f231.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/872d1b10-87f0-4ee6-8c3c-bec12e10f231/872d1b10-87f0-4ee6-8c3c-bec12e10f231.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/872d1b10-87f0-4ee6-8c3c-bec12e10f231/872d1b10-87f0-4ee6-8c3c-bec12e10f231.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The investigation traced Bryan Kohberger’s largely unnoticed life before his arrest, beginning with his upbringing in Pennsylvania’s Pocono Mountains and continuing through his years at Northampton Community College and DeSales University in the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />The investigation traced Bryan Kohberger’s largely unnoticed life before his arrest, beginning with his upbringing in Pennsylvania’s Pocono Mountains and continuing through his years at Northampton Community College and DeSales University in the Lehigh Valley. Former classmates and acquaintances had generally remembered him as quiet, socially awkward, observant and sometimes difficult to engage, but not as someone they believed was capable of extreme violence. He had blended into a region filled with college students, earned degrees in psychology and criminal justice, and studied under forensic psychologist Katherine Ramsland, who was known for her work involving serial killers. Authorities had found no known connection between Kohberger and unsolved crimes in the Lehigh Valley, although reports that he had made women uncomfortable at a Bethlehem brewery took on a more troubling meaning after his arrest.<br /><br />After moving west to pursue a doctorate in criminology at Washington State University, Kohberger had continued to appear isolated and socially awkward. A neighbor recalled that Kohberger had discussed the University of Idaho murders shortly after they occurred, commenting that police appeared to have no leads and speculating about the type of weapon and motive involved. The account emphasized that many of Kohberger’s interactions had seemed ordinary or merely strange at the time but appeared far more ominous in hindsight after investigators connected him to a white Hyundai Elantra and DNA recovered from the knife sheath found inside the King Road residence. The story ultimately portrayed a man who had spent years moving almost invisibly through schools, communities and social settings before suddenly becoming the central figure in one of the country’s most closely watched murder cases.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.lehighvalleylive.com/news/2023/03/bryan-kohbergers-life-under-the-radar-walking-in-the-footsteps-of-an-alleged-mass-murderer.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bryan Kohberger’s life under the radar: Walking in the footsteps of an alleged mass murderer - lehighvalleylive.com</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2052</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Murder In Moscow:  Was Madison Mogen The Target Of The Attack?</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-was-madison-mogen-the-target-of-the-attack--73563673</link><description><![CDATA[A  theory had suggested that Madison Mogen may have been Bryan Kohberger’s intended target when he entered the King Road residence and murdered Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. Forensic psychologist Dr. Gary Brucato argued that the attack appeared to have been driven by a violent psychosexual fantasy rather than a plan to kill everyone inside the house. Brucato believed Kohberger had gone directly to Mogen’s third-floor bedroom expecting to find her alone, only to discover that Goncalves was sharing the bed with her that night. Under that theory, Goncalves became an unexpected victim because she had interrupted the scenario Kohberger had allegedly imagined.<br /><br />Brucato pointed to the location of the first attack, the victims’ injuries and Kohberger’s apparent familiarity with the house as support for his interpretation. He theorized that the killings of Kernodle and Chapin followed after Kohberger encountered people who could identify him or interfere with his escape, turning an allegedly targeted attack into a four-person massacre. However, authorities had never publicly established a motive or confirmed that Mogen, Goncalves or any other individual had been specifically targeted. The theory remained an expert’s interpretation of the available evidence rather than a proven conclusion about why Kohberger committed the murders.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73563673</guid><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73563673/maddietarget.mp3" length="9908184" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/387ec775-8b52-4839-bfb1-d018cd10fbb2/387ec775-8b52-4839-bfb1-d018cd10fbb2.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/387ec775-8b52-4839-bfb1-d018cd10fbb2/387ec775-8b52-4839-bfb1-d018cd10fbb2.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/387ec775-8b52-4839-bfb1-d018cd10fbb2/387ec775-8b52-4839-bfb1-d018cd10fbb2.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A  theory had suggested that Madison Mogen may have been Bryan Kohberger’s intended target when he entered the King Road residence and murdered Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. Forensic psychologist Dr. Gary Brucato argued that...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A  theory had suggested that Madison Mogen may have been Bryan Kohberger’s intended target when he entered the King Road residence and murdered Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. Forensic psychologist Dr. Gary Brucato argued that the attack appeared to have been driven by a violent psychosexual fantasy rather than a plan to kill everyone inside the house. Brucato believed Kohberger had gone directly to Mogen’s third-floor bedroom expecting to find her alone, only to discover that Goncalves was sharing the bed with her that night. Under that theory, Goncalves became an unexpected victim because she had interrupted the scenario Kohberger had allegedly imagined.<br /><br />Brucato pointed to the location of the first attack, the victims’ injuries and Kohberger’s apparent familiarity with the house as support for his interpretation. He theorized that the killings of Kernodle and Chapin followed after Kohberger encountered people who could identify him or interfere with his escape, turning an allegedly targeted attack into a four-person massacre. However, authorities had never publicly established a motive or confirmed that Mogen, Goncalves or any other individual had been specifically targeted. The theory remained an expert’s interpretation of the available evidence rather than a proven conclusion about why Kohberger committed the murders.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>620</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Murder In Moscow:  The Goncalves Family And The 20/20 Interview From 2022</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-the-goncalves-family-and-the-20-20-interview-from-2022--73563672</link><description><![CDATA[Kristi and Steve Goncalves, the parents of 21-year-old Kaylee Goncalves, had pleaded for answers one month after their daughter, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin were stabbed to death inside an off-campus home near the University of Idaho. With no suspect publicly identified at the time, Kristi Goncalves had questioned who the killer was and where that person had gone. She believed the attacker had entered the house methodically, carried out the killings quickly and quietly, and escaped without being detected. Many crucial details had remained unexplained, including the motive, how two roommates on the ground floor survived and whether Kaylee’s dog, Murphy, had reacted while the attack was taking place<br /><br />The Goncalves family had also grown frustrated by the limited information investigators released, particularly regarding possible DNA evidence and a white Hyundai Elantra seen near the house around the time of the murders. Their attorney, Shannon Gray, had said the lack of information pushed grieving parents deeper into speculation, although the family still hoped police were following the correct investigative path. Moscow police had defended their secrecy by saying they possessed significant information but needed to protect the case and secure not only an arrest but a conviction. Steve Goncalves had urged local residents to submit surveillance footage before recordings were erased, while the families of Kaylee and Madison prepared a joint celebration of life intended to focus on the close friends’ happy and positive lives.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://abcnews.go.com/US/parents-slain-idaho-student-desperate-answers/story?id=95219080" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">https://abcnews.go.com/US/parents-slain-idaho-student-desperate-answers/story?id=95219080</a><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73563672</guid><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73563672/goncabcint.mp3" length="15777585" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/55caf213-4285-48a8-8209-0a6a207a3ba8/55caf213-4285-48a8-8209-0a6a207a3ba8.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/55caf213-4285-48a8-8209-0a6a207a3ba8/55caf213-4285-48a8-8209-0a6a207a3ba8.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/55caf213-4285-48a8-8209-0a6a207a3ba8/55caf213-4285-48a8-8209-0a6a207a3ba8.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Kristi and Steve Goncalves, the parents of 21-year-old Kaylee Goncalves, had pleaded for answers one month after their daughter, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin were stabbed to death inside an off-campus home near the University of...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Kristi and Steve Goncalves, the parents of 21-year-old Kaylee Goncalves, had pleaded for answers one month after their daughter, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin were stabbed to death inside an off-campus home near the University of Idaho. With no suspect publicly identified at the time, Kristi Goncalves had questioned who the killer was and where that person had gone. She believed the attacker had entered the house methodically, carried out the killings quickly and quietly, and escaped without being detected. Many crucial details had remained unexplained, including the motive, how two roommates on the ground floor survived and whether Kaylee’s dog, Murphy, had reacted while the attack was taking place<br /><br />The Goncalves family had also grown frustrated by the limited information investigators released, particularly regarding possible DNA evidence and a white Hyundai Elantra seen near the house around the time of the murders. Their attorney, Shannon Gray, had said the lack of information pushed grieving parents deeper into speculation, although the family still hoped police were following the correct investigative path. Moscow police had defended their secrecy by saying they possessed significant information but needed to protect the case and secure not only an arrest but a conviction. Steve Goncalves had urged local residents to submit surveillance footage before recordings were erased, while the families of Kaylee and Madison prepared a joint celebration of life intended to focus on the close friends’ happy and positive lives.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://abcnews.go.com/US/parents-slain-idaho-student-desperate-answers/story?id=95219080" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">https://abcnews.go.com/US/parents-slain-idaho-student-desperate-answers/story?id=95219080</a><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>987</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Utah’s Memorandum for Binding Tyler Robinson Over for Trial (Part 4) (8/5/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/utah-s-memorandum-for-binding-tyler-robinson-over-for-trial-part-4-8-5-26--73504507</link><description><![CDATA[Utah prosecutors argued in their bindover memorandum that the evidence presented during Tyler Robinson’s five-day preliminary hearing easily established probable cause for him to stand trial on all seven charges connected to the killing of Charlie Kirk. The state pointed to Robinson’s alleged admissions to his roommate, Lance Twiggs, and several friends, including messages in which he reportedly acknowledged shooting Kirk, described planning the attack for more than a week and discussed retrieving or concealing the rifle. Prosecutors maintained that those statements were reinforced by surveillance footage allegedly tracking Robinson onto the roof of Utah Valley University’s Losee Center, eyewitness testimony and DNA evidence connecting him to the rifle recovered near the campus. The memorandum emphasized that the state was not required to prove Robinson’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt at this stage, only that there was sufficient evidence to reasonably believe he committed the crimes.<br /><br />The state asked Judge Tony Graf Jr. to bind Robinson over for trial on aggravated murder and the remaining charges, which included felony discharge of a firearm, obstruction of justice, witness tampering and committing a violent offense in the presence of a child. Prosecutors also defended the victim-targeting enhancement, arguing that Robinson allegedly selected Kirk because of Kirk’s political and religious positions, particularly his views concerning gender and sexuality. According to the state, Robinson’s alleged statements showed both an intent to kill and a motive rooted in hostility toward Kirk’s beliefs, while his purported efforts to hide the weapon and influence Twiggs supported the additional charges. Calling the matter one of the most straightforward bindover decisions the court was likely to encounter, prosecutors concluded that the combined admissions, forensic evidence, videos and witness accounts supported sending every count to trial.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/1067587104/Memorandum-in-Support-of-Preliminary-Hearing-Bindover-in-Tyler-Robinson-case" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Memorandum in Support of Preliminary Hearing Bindover in Tyler Robinson case | PDF | Defendant | Bullet</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73504507</guid><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73504507/robinsonbindingmemo4.mp3" length="15460772" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cde4f99e-4269-42d3-a0d7-bdd56fd3602c/cde4f99e-4269-42d3-a0d7-bdd56fd3602c.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cde4f99e-4269-42d3-a0d7-bdd56fd3602c/cde4f99e-4269-42d3-a0d7-bdd56fd3602c.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cde4f99e-4269-42d3-a0d7-bdd56fd3602c/cde4f99e-4269-42d3-a0d7-bdd56fd3602c.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Utah prosecutors argued in their bindover memorandum that the evidence presented during Tyler Robinson’s five-day preliminary hearing easily established probable cause for him to stand trial on all seven charges connected to the killing of Charlie...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Utah prosecutors argued in their bindover memorandum that the evidence presented during Tyler Robinson’s five-day preliminary hearing easily established probable cause for him to stand trial on all seven charges connected to the killing of Charlie Kirk. The state pointed to Robinson’s alleged admissions to his roommate, Lance Twiggs, and several friends, including messages in which he reportedly acknowledged shooting Kirk, described planning the attack for more than a week and discussed retrieving or concealing the rifle. Prosecutors maintained that those statements were reinforced by surveillance footage allegedly tracking Robinson onto the roof of Utah Valley University’s Losee Center, eyewitness testimony and DNA evidence connecting him to the rifle recovered near the campus. The memorandum emphasized that the state was not required to prove Robinson’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt at this stage, only that there was sufficient evidence to reasonably believe he committed the crimes.<br /><br />The state asked Judge Tony Graf Jr. to bind Robinson over for trial on aggravated murder and the remaining charges, which included felony discharge of a firearm, obstruction of justice, witness tampering and committing a violent offense in the presence of a child. Prosecutors also defended the victim-targeting enhancement, arguing that Robinson allegedly selected Kirk because of Kirk’s political and religious positions, particularly his views concerning gender and sexuality. According to the state, Robinson’s alleged statements showed both an intent to kill and a motive rooted in hostility toward Kirk’s beliefs, while his purported efforts to hide the weapon and influence Twiggs supported the additional charges. Calling the matter one of the most straightforward bindover decisions the court was likely to encounter, prosecutors concluded that the combined admissions, forensic evidence, videos and witness accounts supported sending every count to trial.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/1067587104/Memorandum-in-Support-of-Preliminary-Hearing-Bindover-in-Tyler-Robinson-case" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Memorandum in Support of Preliminary Hearing Bindover in Tyler Robinson case | PDF | Defendant | Bullet</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>967</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvu</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Utah’s Memorandum for Binding Tyler Robinson Over for Trial (Part 3) (8/4/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/utah-s-memorandum-for-binding-tyler-robinson-over-for-trial-part-3-8-4-26--73451669</link><description><![CDATA[Utah prosecutors argued in their bindover memorandum that the evidence presented during Tyler Robinson’s five-day preliminary hearing easily established probable cause for him to stand trial on all seven charges connected to the killing of Charlie Kirk. The state pointed to Robinson’s alleged admissions to his roommate, Lance Twiggs, and several friends, including messages in which he reportedly acknowledged shooting Kirk, described planning the attack for more than a week and discussed retrieving or concealing the rifle. Prosecutors maintained that those statements were reinforced by surveillance footage allegedly tracking Robinson onto the roof of Utah Valley University’s Losee Center, eyewitness testimony and DNA evidence connecting him to the rifle recovered near the campus. The memorandum emphasized that the state was not required to prove Robinson’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt at this stage, only that there was sufficient evidence to reasonably believe he committed the crimes.<br /><br />The state asked Judge Tony Graf Jr. to bind Robinson over for trial on aggravated murder and the remaining charges, which included felony discharge of a firearm, obstruction of justice, witness tampering and committing a violent offense in the presence of a child. Prosecutors also defended the victim-targeting enhancement, arguing that Robinson allegedly selected Kirk because of Kirk’s political and religious positions, particularly his views concerning gender and sexuality. According to the state, Robinson’s alleged statements showed both an intent to kill and a motive rooted in hostility toward Kirk’s beliefs, while his purported efforts to hide the weapon and influence Twiggs supported the additional charges. Calling the matter one of the most straightforward bindover decisions the court was likely to encounter, prosecutors concluded that the combined admissions, forensic evidence, videos and witness accounts supported sending every count to trial.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/1067587104/Memorandum-in-Support-of-Preliminary-Hearing-Bindover-in-Tyler-Robinson-case" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Memorandum in Support of Preliminary Hearing Bindover in Tyler Robinson case | PDF | Defendant | Bullet</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73451669</guid><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 22:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73451669/robinsonbindingmemo3.mp3" length="12115008" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e248551b-bc78-49a3-a4ac-a22f44e0ce4d/e248551b-bc78-49a3-a4ac-a22f44e0ce4d.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e248551b-bc78-49a3-a4ac-a22f44e0ce4d/e248551b-bc78-49a3-a4ac-a22f44e0ce4d.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e248551b-bc78-49a3-a4ac-a22f44e0ce4d/e248551b-bc78-49a3-a4ac-a22f44e0ce4d.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Utah prosecutors argued in their bindover memorandum that the evidence presented during Tyler Robinson’s five-day preliminary hearing easily established probable cause for him to stand trial on all seven charges connected to the killing of Charlie...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Utah prosecutors argued in their bindover memorandum that the evidence presented during Tyler Robinson’s five-day preliminary hearing easily established probable cause for him to stand trial on all seven charges connected to the killing of Charlie Kirk. The state pointed to Robinson’s alleged admissions to his roommate, Lance Twiggs, and several friends, including messages in which he reportedly acknowledged shooting Kirk, described planning the attack for more than a week and discussed retrieving or concealing the rifle. Prosecutors maintained that those statements were reinforced by surveillance footage allegedly tracking Robinson onto the roof of Utah Valley University’s Losee Center, eyewitness testimony and DNA evidence connecting him to the rifle recovered near the campus. The memorandum emphasized that the state was not required to prove Robinson’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt at this stage, only that there was sufficient evidence to reasonably believe he committed the crimes.<br /><br />The state asked Judge Tony Graf Jr. to bind Robinson over for trial on aggravated murder and the remaining charges, which included felony discharge of a firearm, obstruction of justice, witness tampering and committing a violent offense in the presence of a child. Prosecutors also defended the victim-targeting enhancement, arguing that Robinson allegedly selected Kirk because of Kirk’s political and religious positions, particularly his views concerning gender and sexuality. According to the state, Robinson’s alleged statements showed both an intent to kill and a motive rooted in hostility toward Kirk’s beliefs, while his purported efforts to hide the weapon and influence Twiggs supported the additional charges. Calling the matter one of the most straightforward bindover decisions the court was likely to encounter, prosecutors concluded that the combined admissions, forensic evidence, videos and witness accounts supported sending every count to trial.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/1067587104/Memorandum-in-Support-of-Preliminary-Hearing-Bindover-in-Tyler-Robinson-case" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Memorandum in Support of Preliminary Hearing Bindover in Tyler Robinson case | PDF | Defendant | Bullet</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>758</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvu</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Murder In Moscow:   The Long Legal Road Behind Kohberger’s Latest Filing (Part 2) (8/6/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-the-long-legal-road-behind-kohberger-s-latest-filing-part-2-8-6-26--73563213</link><description><![CDATA[Bryan Kohberger pleaded guilty in July 2025 to murdering University of Idaho students Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin, avoiding the death penalty in exchange for four consecutive life sentences without parole. The agreement ended years of litigation over DNA found on a knife sheath, surveillance footage of a white Hyundai Elantra, cellphone records, witness testimony, genetic genealogy, and other evidence prosecutors said connected him to the King Road residence. During the plea hearing, Kohberger told the court that he understood the charges, was satisfied with his attorneys, was acting voluntarily, and was pleading guilty because he was guilty. The deal spared the victims’ families from a lengthy capital trial, but it did not answer the lingering questions about motive, the missing murder weapon, or why the four students were targeted.<br /><br />Kohberger is now seeking post-conviction relief and asking the court to allow him to withdraw those guilty pleas. He claims his former attorneys pressured him into falsely confessing, misled him about death-row and prison conditions, provided ineffective representation, and failed to properly disclose or explain potentially exculpatory evidence. His newly appointed attorney, Greg Rauch, is reviewing those allegations, while Idaho prosecutors are defending the convictions and emphasizing Kohberger’s sworn courtroom admissions and the substantial evidence against him. The court has not ruled that his claims are credible, and Kohberger must meet the demanding post-sentencing standard of proving a manifest injustice. Even if he succeeds, he would not be released automatically, because the murder charges could return, the case could proceed to trial, and prosecutors might seek to restore the death penalty.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73563213</guid><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73563213/kohbergerstatus2.mp3" length="11978336" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0e7b71d1-9b46-4169-a0dc-566a797fb931/0e7b71d1-9b46-4169-a0dc-566a797fb931.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0e7b71d1-9b46-4169-a0dc-566a797fb931/0e7b71d1-9b46-4169-a0dc-566a797fb931.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0e7b71d1-9b46-4169-a0dc-566a797fb931/0e7b71d1-9b46-4169-a0dc-566a797fb931.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Bryan Kohberger pleaded guilty in July 2025 to murdering University of Idaho students Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin, avoiding the death penalty in exchange for four consecutive life sentences without parole. The...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Bryan Kohberger pleaded guilty in July 2025 to murdering University of Idaho students Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin, avoiding the death penalty in exchange for four consecutive life sentences without parole. The agreement ended years of litigation over DNA found on a knife sheath, surveillance footage of a white Hyundai Elantra, cellphone records, witness testimony, genetic genealogy, and other evidence prosecutors said connected him to the King Road residence. During the plea hearing, Kohberger told the court that he understood the charges, was satisfied with his attorneys, was acting voluntarily, and was pleading guilty because he was guilty. The deal spared the victims’ families from a lengthy capital trial, but it did not answer the lingering questions about motive, the missing murder weapon, or why the four students were targeted.<br /><br />Kohberger is now seeking post-conviction relief and asking the court to allow him to withdraw those guilty pleas. He claims his former attorneys pressured him into falsely confessing, misled him about death-row and prison conditions, provided ineffective representation, and failed to properly disclose or explain potentially exculpatory evidence. His newly appointed attorney, Greg Rauch, is reviewing those allegations, while Idaho prosecutors are defending the convictions and emphasizing Kohberger’s sworn courtroom admissions and the substantial evidence against him. The court has not ruled that his claims are credible, and Kohberger must meet the demanding post-sentencing standard of proving a manifest injustice. Even if he succeeds, he would not be released automatically, because the murder charges could return, the case could proceed to trial, and prosecutors might seek to restore the death penalty.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>749</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Jeffrey Epstein’s Alleged Plot to Blackmail Sarah Ferguson (8/6/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/jeffrey-epstein-s-alleged-plot-to-blackmail-sarah-ferguson-8-6-26--73504506</link><description><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein allegedly attempted to use his financial leverage over Sarah Ferguson to pressure her into publicly repairing his reputation after she condemned her association with him. Ferguson had described accepting £15,000 from Epstein as a serious error of judgment, but private communications showed Epstein and his advisers discussing how to make her retract or soften those remarks. Ferguson later sent Epstein an apologetic message describing him as a loyal and generous friend and explaining that her public criticism had been intended to protect her own reputation. The communications suggested that Epstein viewed the financial help and favors he provided as leverage he could use when an associate threatened his public image.<br /><br />Ferguson’s financial problems appeared to make her particularly vulnerable to that pressure. She repeatedly sought money, employment opportunities and business support from Epstein even after his 2008 conviction, while he remained involved in ventures connected to her and controlled internet domains associated with one of her projects. When Ferguson sought the return of those domains, Epstein’s lawyer reportedly treated the matter as part of a negotiation tied to her public support for him. Although the available evidence did not conclusively establish criminal blackmail, it showed Epstein attempting to exploit financial dependency and personal loyalty to secure favorable statements from someone whose public condemnation threatened his efforts to rehabilitate his reputation.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://inews.co.uk/news/inside-epsteins-plot-blackmail-sarah-ferguson-4673997" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Inside Epstein’s plot to ‘blackmail’ Sarah Ferguson over paedophile comments</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73504506</guid><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 18:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73504506/epsteinblackmailfergie.mp3" length="11212217" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b0455859-ba6c-4bad-8a70-eda834db5e6e/b0455859-ba6c-4bad-8a70-eda834db5e6e.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b0455859-ba6c-4bad-8a70-eda834db5e6e/b0455859-ba6c-4bad-8a70-eda834db5e6e.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b0455859-ba6c-4bad-8a70-eda834db5e6e/b0455859-ba6c-4bad-8a70-eda834db5e6e.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jeffrey Epstein allegedly attempted to use his financial leverage over Sarah Ferguson to pressure her into publicly repairing his reputation after she condemned her association with him. Ferguson had described accepting £15,000 from Epstein as a...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein allegedly attempted to use his financial leverage over Sarah Ferguson to pressure her into publicly repairing his reputation after she condemned her association with him. Ferguson had described accepting £15,000 from Epstein as a serious error of judgment, but private communications showed Epstein and his advisers discussing how to make her retract or soften those remarks. Ferguson later sent Epstein an apologetic message describing him as a loyal and generous friend and explaining that her public criticism had been intended to protect her own reputation. The communications suggested that Epstein viewed the financial help and favors he provided as leverage he could use when an associate threatened his public image.<br /><br />Ferguson’s financial problems appeared to make her particularly vulnerable to that pressure. She repeatedly sought money, employment opportunities and business support from Epstein even after his 2008 conviction, while he remained involved in ventures connected to her and controlled internet domains associated with one of her projects. When Ferguson sought the return of those domains, Epstein’s lawyer reportedly treated the matter as part of a negotiation tied to her public support for him. Although the available evidence did not conclusively establish criminal blackmail, it showed Epstein attempting to exploit financial dependency and personal loyalty to secure favorable statements from someone whose public condemnation threatened his efforts to rehabilitate his reputation.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://inews.co.uk/news/inside-epsteins-plot-blackmail-sarah-ferguson-4673997" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Inside Epstein’s plot to ‘blackmail’ Sarah Ferguson over paedophile comments</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>701</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Senators Tillis and Cornyn Fold After Raising Questions About Todd Blanche (8/6/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/senators-tillis-and-cornyn-fold-after-raising-questions-about-todd-blanche-8-6-26--73504509</link><description><![CDATA[Sens. Thom Tillis and John Cornyn faced sharp criticism for supporting Todd Blanche’s nomination after Epstein survivors urged them to oppose it. Both senators had publicly raised concerns about Blanche and used their positions on the Senate Judiciary Committee to delay the nomination and seek concessions. Tillis had also said Blanche needed to meet with survivors before receiving his support. After that meeting took place, however, the survivors reportedly remained opposed to the nomination, and both senators ultimately voted to advance Blanche. Critics argued that the senators treated the meeting as a procedural requirement rather than allowing the survivors’ concerns to meaningfully influence their decisions.<br /><br />The episode was portrayed as part of a broader pattern in the Epstein case in which survivors were invited to speak but were disregarded when their demands conflicted with political or institutional interests. Tillis and Cornyn possessed enough leverage to block or further delay the nomination, but instead accepted assurances from Blanche and returned to the Republican position. Their critics said the decision undermined the senators’ claims that they were demanding accountability and reinforced the perception that survivor testimony carried less weight than party loyalty and political convenience. The central criticism was that both men presented themselves as willing to challenge Blanche, but abandoned that stance once they were given sufficient political cover to support him.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73504509</guid><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73504509/cornyntillisbetrayal.mp3" length="10886208" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4636945b-80cf-4043-b20c-f9d6a7eb05d6/4636945b-80cf-4043-b20c-f9d6a7eb05d6.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4636945b-80cf-4043-b20c-f9d6a7eb05d6/4636945b-80cf-4043-b20c-f9d6a7eb05d6.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4636945b-80cf-4043-b20c-f9d6a7eb05d6/4636945b-80cf-4043-b20c-f9d6a7eb05d6.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Sens. Thom Tillis and John Cornyn faced sharp criticism for supporting Todd Blanche’s nomination after Epstein survivors urged them to oppose it. Both senators had publicly raised concerns about Blanche and used their positions on the Senate Judiciary...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Sens. Thom Tillis and John Cornyn faced sharp criticism for supporting Todd Blanche’s nomination after Epstein survivors urged them to oppose it. Both senators had publicly raised concerns about Blanche and used their positions on the Senate Judiciary Committee to delay the nomination and seek concessions. Tillis had also said Blanche needed to meet with survivors before receiving his support. After that meeting took place, however, the survivors reportedly remained opposed to the nomination, and both senators ultimately voted to advance Blanche. Critics argued that the senators treated the meeting as a procedural requirement rather than allowing the survivors’ concerns to meaningfully influence their decisions.<br /><br />The episode was portrayed as part of a broader pattern in the Epstein case in which survivors were invited to speak but were disregarded when their demands conflicted with political or institutional interests. Tillis and Cornyn possessed enough leverage to block or further delay the nomination, but instead accepted assurances from Blanche and returned to the Republican position. Their critics said the decision undermined the senators’ claims that they were demanding accountability and reinforced the perception that survivor testimony carried less weight than party loyalty and political convenience. The central criticism was that both men presented themselves as willing to challenge Blanche, but abandoned that stance once they were given sufficient political cover to support him.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>681</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Federal Regulators Pressed to Examine Epstein’s Financial Network (8/6/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/federal-regulators-pressed-to-examine-epstein-s-financial-network-8-6-26--73504511</link><description><![CDATA[Senator Ron Wyden called on federal regulators to investigate Bank of America, Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan Chase over their handling of Jeffrey Epstein’s financial accounts, alleging that the banks may have failed to identify and report suspicious transactions quickly enough. Wyden’s findings followed a four-year investigation drawing on suspicious activity reports, court records, lawsuits and information obtained from the Treasury Department and financial institutions. His report alleged that Bank of America failed to properly screen and report roughly $170 million in payments to Epstein, while Deutsche Bank allegedly delayed reporting more than $250 million in suspicious wire transfers, including payments to women in Russia and other parts of Eastern Europe.<br /><br /><br />Wyden also accused JPMorgan of delaying reports concerning more than $1 billion in Epstein-linked transfers, including payments involving women in Russia and Belarus. JPMorgan rejected that allegation, saying it had flagged suspicious activity as early as 2002 and continued reporting concerns even after ending its relationship with Epstein in 2013. Bank of America denied facilitating wrongdoing, while Deutsche Bank expressed regret over its historical relationship with Epstein and said it had cooperated with regulators and strengthened its controls. Reuters noted that it had not independently verified the details of Wyden’s report, while the Treasury Department declined to say whether any investigation was underway.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source<br /><br /><a href="https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-senator-wyden-urges-regulators-probe-wall-street-banks-over-epstein-accounts-2026-08-04/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">US Senator Wyden urges regulators to probe Wall Street banks over Epstein accounts | Reuters</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73504511</guid><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 14:57:46 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73504511/wydenepsteinmoneytrail.mp3" length="10194068" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1ce6c3b6-0edd-45e1-8df7-82ea76c6682d/1ce6c3b6-0edd-45e1-8df7-82ea76c6682d.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1ce6c3b6-0edd-45e1-8df7-82ea76c6682d/1ce6c3b6-0edd-45e1-8df7-82ea76c6682d.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1ce6c3b6-0edd-45e1-8df7-82ea76c6682d/1ce6c3b6-0edd-45e1-8df7-82ea76c6682d.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Senator Ron Wyden called on federal regulators to investigate Bank of America, Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan Chase over their handling of Jeffrey Epstein’s financial accounts, alleging that the banks may have failed to identify and report suspicious...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Senator Ron Wyden called on federal regulators to investigate Bank of America, Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan Chase over their handling of Jeffrey Epstein’s financial accounts, alleging that the banks may have failed to identify and report suspicious transactions quickly enough. Wyden’s findings followed a four-year investigation drawing on suspicious activity reports, court records, lawsuits and information obtained from the Treasury Department and financial institutions. His report alleged that Bank of America failed to properly screen and report roughly $170 million in payments to Epstein, while Deutsche Bank allegedly delayed reporting more than $250 million in suspicious wire transfers, including payments to women in Russia and other parts of Eastern Europe.<br /><br /><br />Wyden also accused JPMorgan of delaying reports concerning more than $1 billion in Epstein-linked transfers, including payments involving women in Russia and Belarus. JPMorgan rejected that allegation, saying it had flagged suspicious activity as early as 2002 and continued reporting concerns even after ending its relationship with Epstein in 2013. Bank of America denied facilitating wrongdoing, while Deutsche Bank expressed regret over its historical relationship with Epstein and said it had cooperated with regulators and strengthened its controls. Reuters noted that it had not independently verified the details of Wyden’s report, while the Treasury Department declined to say whether any investigation was underway.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source<br /><br /><a href="https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-senator-wyden-urges-regulators-probe-wall-street-banks-over-epstein-accounts-2026-08-04/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">US Senator Wyden urges regulators to probe Wall Street banks over Epstein accounts | Reuters</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>638</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Todd Blanche and the Epstein Files Accountability Crisis That Isn't Going Away (8/5/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/todd-blanche-and-the-epstein-files-accountability-crisis-that-isn-t-going-away-8-5-26--73451667</link><description><![CDATA[Epstein survivor Danielle Bensky argued that acting Attorney General Todd Blanche was unfit to lead the Justice Department because his handling of the Epstein files appeared to protect powerful people while exposing survivors. Bensky described how the government released her name, phone number, former addresses, employment history and deeply personal accounts of her abuse, while many alleged abusers, enablers and influential figures remained concealed behind extensive redactions. She noted that a federal judge had ordered the Justice Department to justify or remove some of those redactions and stressed that, despite evidence involving more than a thousand women and girls, only Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell had been prosecuted. According to Bensky, Blanche bore substantial responsibility because former Attorney General Pam Bondi testified that he had overseen the files’ release.<br /><br />Bensky was also highly critical of Blanche’s treatment of survivors during his confirmation process. She said he ignored her repeated requests for a meeting for nearly nine months, even as he spent nine hours interviewing Maxwell, who was subsequently transferred to a lower-security prison. Blanche only agreed to meet Bensky and other survivors after Republican Senator Thom Tillis suggested he could not support Blanche’s nomination without meaningful survivor engagement. Bensky characterized the hastily arranged meeting as little more than a political box-checking exercise intended to secure Tillis’ vote, rather than a genuine attempt to hear survivors, investigate unresolved leads or pursue additional accountability. Her central argument was that Blanche had treated the Epstein matter as a political and public-relations problem instead of an unfinished criminal-justice crisis.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73451667</guid><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73451667/blanchedismissivesurvivors.mp3" length="13044132" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2bb2c16c-ed8a-4d05-bc8e-ef36ea1a6496/2bb2c16c-ed8a-4d05-bc8e-ef36ea1a6496.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2bb2c16c-ed8a-4d05-bc8e-ef36ea1a6496/2bb2c16c-ed8a-4d05-bc8e-ef36ea1a6496.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2bb2c16c-ed8a-4d05-bc8e-ef36ea1a6496/2bb2c16c-ed8a-4d05-bc8e-ef36ea1a6496.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Epstein survivor Danielle Bensky argued that acting Attorney General Todd Blanche was unfit to lead the Justice Department because his handling of the Epstein files appeared to protect powerful people while exposing survivors. Bensky described how the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Epstein survivor Danielle Bensky argued that acting Attorney General Todd Blanche was unfit to lead the Justice Department because his handling of the Epstein files appeared to protect powerful people while exposing survivors. Bensky described how the government released her name, phone number, former addresses, employment history and deeply personal accounts of her abuse, while many alleged abusers, enablers and influential figures remained concealed behind extensive redactions. She noted that a federal judge had ordered the Justice Department to justify or remove some of those redactions and stressed that, despite evidence involving more than a thousand women and girls, only Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell had been prosecuted. According to Bensky, Blanche bore substantial responsibility because former Attorney General Pam Bondi testified that he had overseen the files’ release.<br /><br />Bensky was also highly critical of Blanche’s treatment of survivors during his confirmation process. She said he ignored her repeated requests for a meeting for nearly nine months, even as he spent nine hours interviewing Maxwell, who was subsequently transferred to a lower-security prison. Blanche only agreed to meet Bensky and other survivors after Republican Senator Thom Tillis suggested he could not support Blanche’s nomination without meaningful survivor engagement. Bensky characterized the hastily arranged meeting as little more than a political box-checking exercise intended to secure Tillis’ vote, rather than a genuine attempt to hear survivors, investigate unresolved leads or pursue additional accountability. Her central argument was that Blanche had treated the Epstein matter as a political and public-relations problem instead of an unfinished criminal-justice crisis.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>816</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Murder In Moscow:  Trial Expert Bryan Edelman And The Affidavit In Support Of Kohberger (Part 6-11) (8/6/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-trial-expert-bryan-edelman-and-the-affidavit-in-support-of-kohberger-part-6-11-8-6-26--73503929</link><description><![CDATA[Bryan Edelman, a trial consultant retained by Bryan Kohberger’s defense, argued that the enormous volume of pretrial publicity surrounding the University of Idaho murders had made it extraordinarily difficult to find an impartial jury in Latah County. Edelman conducted telephone surveys of hundreds of prospective jurors and found widespread familiarity with the case, substantial exposure to inflammatory or disputed media claims and a strong tendency among respondents to believe Kohberger was guilty before hearing the evidence. He maintained that repeated reporting about the knife-sheath DNA, Kohberger’s vehicle, cellphone data, alleged stalking and other incriminating details had created fixed impressions in the community, even though some of those claims remained contested or potentially inadmissible. In Edelman’s view, Kohberger would have entered a Latah County courtroom already burdened with disproving conclusions that prospective jurors had formed from months of publicity.<br /><br />Edelman also defended the defense team’s controversial public-opinion survey, explaining that its purpose had been to measure what residents had already heard and how that information affected their attitudes, not to persuade or contaminate them. He argued that ordinary jury questioning would not necessarily uncover the full extent of bias because prospective jurors might forget, minimize or fail to disclose the information they had absorbed. His declaration concluded that expanding the jury pool or relying on voir dire would not adequately cure the problem in a small community so closely connected to the victims, the university and the investigation. Edelman therefore supported moving the trial to Ada County, where a much larger population and broader jury pool offered Kohberger a better chance of receiving a trial before jurors who had not already decided the case.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://file///C:/Users/17024/Downloads/072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73503929</guid><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73503929/megaedelman6n7n8n9n10n11.mp3" length="68625180" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/66fd9083-32f9-47d5-abc4-5321d6cfdbb5/66fd9083-32f9-47d5-abc4-5321d6cfdbb5.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/66fd9083-32f9-47d5-abc4-5321d6cfdbb5/66fd9083-32f9-47d5-abc4-5321d6cfdbb5.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/66fd9083-32f9-47d5-abc4-5321d6cfdbb5/66fd9083-32f9-47d5-abc4-5321d6cfdbb5.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Bryan Edelman, a trial consultant retained by Bryan Kohberger’s defense, argued that the enormous volume of pretrial publicity surrounding the University of Idaho murders had made it extraordinarily difficult to find an impartial jury in Latah County....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Bryan Edelman, a trial consultant retained by Bryan Kohberger’s defense, argued that the enormous volume of pretrial publicity surrounding the University of Idaho murders had made it extraordinarily difficult to find an impartial jury in Latah County. Edelman conducted telephone surveys of hundreds of prospective jurors and found widespread familiarity with the case, substantial exposure to inflammatory or disputed media claims and a strong tendency among respondents to believe Kohberger was guilty before hearing the evidence. He maintained that repeated reporting about the knife-sheath DNA, Kohberger’s vehicle, cellphone data, alleged stalking and other incriminating details had created fixed impressions in the community, even though some of those claims remained contested or potentially inadmissible. In Edelman’s view, Kohberger would have entered a Latah County courtroom already burdened with disproving conclusions that prospective jurors had formed from months of publicity.<br /><br />Edelman also defended the defense team’s controversial public-opinion survey, explaining that its purpose had been to measure what residents had already heard and how that information affected their attitudes, not to persuade or contaminate them. He argued that ordinary jury questioning would not necessarily uncover the full extent of bias because prospective jurors might forget, minimize or fail to disclose the information they had absorbed. His declaration concluded that expanding the jury pool or relying on voir dire would not adequately cure the problem in a small community so closely connected to the victims, the university and the investigation. Edelman therefore supported moving the trial to Ada County, where a much larger population and broader jury pool offered Kohberger a better chance of receiving a trial before jurors who had not already decided the case.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://file///C:/Users/17024/Downloads/072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4290</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Murder In Moscow:  Trial Expert Bryan Edelman And The Affidavit In Support Of Kohberger (Part 4-6) (8/6/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-trial-expert-bryan-edelman-and-the-affidavit-in-support-of-kohberger-part-4-6-8-6-26--73503930</link><description><![CDATA[Bryan Edelman, a trial consultant retained by Bryan Kohberger’s defense, argued that the enormous volume of pretrial publicity surrounding the University of Idaho murders had made it extraordinarily difficult to find an impartial jury in Latah County. Edelman conducted telephone surveys of hundreds of prospective jurors and found widespread familiarity with the case, substantial exposure to inflammatory or disputed media claims and a strong tendency among respondents to believe Kohberger was guilty before hearing the evidence. He maintained that repeated reporting about the knife-sheath DNA, Kohberger’s vehicle, cellphone data, alleged stalking and other incriminating details had created fixed impressions in the community, even though some of those claims remained contested or potentially inadmissible. In Edelman’s view, Kohberger would have entered a Latah County courtroom already burdened with disproving conclusions that prospective jurors had formed from months of publicity.<br /><br />Edelman also defended the defense team’s controversial public-opinion survey, explaining that its purpose had been to measure what residents had already heard and how that information affected their attitudes, not to persuade or contaminate them. He argued that ordinary jury questioning would not necessarily uncover the full extent of bias because prospective jurors might forget, minimize or fail to disclose the information they had absorbed. His declaration concluded that expanding the jury pool or relying on voir dire would not adequately cure the problem in a small community so closely connected to the victims, the university and the investigation. Edelman therefore supported moving the trial to Ada County, where a much larger population and broader jury pool offered Kohberger a better chance of receiving a trial before jurors who had not already decided the case.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://file///C:/Users/17024/Downloads/072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73503930</guid><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73503930/megaedelman4n5n6.mp3" length="34825239" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0a969cc6-a93f-4b30-958f-dfb16d8938fe/0a969cc6-a93f-4b30-958f-dfb16d8938fe.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0a969cc6-a93f-4b30-958f-dfb16d8938fe/0a969cc6-a93f-4b30-958f-dfb16d8938fe.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0a969cc6-a93f-4b30-958f-dfb16d8938fe/0a969cc6-a93f-4b30-958f-dfb16d8938fe.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Bryan Edelman, a trial consultant retained by Bryan Kohberger’s defense, argued that the enormous volume of pretrial publicity surrounding the University of Idaho murders had made it extraordinarily difficult to find an impartial jury in Latah County....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Bryan Edelman, a trial consultant retained by Bryan Kohberger’s defense, argued that the enormous volume of pretrial publicity surrounding the University of Idaho murders had made it extraordinarily difficult to find an impartial jury in Latah County. Edelman conducted telephone surveys of hundreds of prospective jurors and found widespread familiarity with the case, substantial exposure to inflammatory or disputed media claims and a strong tendency among respondents to believe Kohberger was guilty before hearing the evidence. He maintained that repeated reporting about the knife-sheath DNA, Kohberger’s vehicle, cellphone data, alleged stalking and other incriminating details had created fixed impressions in the community, even though some of those claims remained contested or potentially inadmissible. In Edelman’s view, Kohberger would have entered a Latah County courtroom already burdened with disproving conclusions that prospective jurors had formed from months of publicity.<br /><br />Edelman also defended the defense team’s controversial public-opinion survey, explaining that its purpose had been to measure what residents had already heard and how that information affected their attitudes, not to persuade or contaminate them. He argued that ordinary jury questioning would not necessarily uncover the full extent of bias because prospective jurors might forget, minimize or fail to disclose the information they had absorbed. His declaration concluded that expanding the jury pool or relying on voir dire would not adequately cure the problem in a small community so closely connected to the victims, the university and the investigation. Edelman therefore supported moving the trial to Ada County, where a much larger population and broader jury pool offered Kohberger a better chance of receiving a trial before jurors who had not already decided the case.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://file///C:/Users/17024/Downloads/072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2177</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Murder In Moscow:  Trial Expert Bryan Edelman And The Affidavit In Support Of Kohberger (Part 1-3) (8/5/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-trial-expert-bryan-edelman-and-the-affidavit-in-support-of-kohberger-part-1-3-8-5-26--73503931</link><description><![CDATA[Bryan Edelman, a trial consultant retained by Bryan Kohberger’s defense, argued that the enormous volume of pretrial publicity surrounding the University of Idaho murders had made it extraordinarily difficult to find an impartial jury in Latah County. Edelman conducted telephone surveys of hundreds of prospective jurors and found widespread familiarity with the case, substantial exposure to inflammatory or disputed media claims and a strong tendency among respondents to believe Kohberger was guilty before hearing the evidence. He maintained that repeated reporting about the knife-sheath DNA, Kohberger’s vehicle, cellphone data, alleged stalking and other incriminating details had created fixed impressions in the community, even though some of those claims remained contested or potentially inadmissible. In Edelman’s view, Kohberger would have entered a Latah County courtroom already burdened with disproving conclusions that prospective jurors had formed from months of publicity.<br /><br />Edelman also defended the defense team’s controversial public-opinion survey, explaining that its purpose had been to measure what residents had already heard and how that information affected their attitudes, not to persuade or contaminate them. He argued that ordinary jury questioning would not necessarily uncover the full extent of bias because prospective jurors might forget, minimize or fail to disclose the information they had absorbed. His declaration concluded that expanding the jury pool or relying on voir dire would not adequately cure the problem in a small community so closely connected to the victims, the university and the investigation. Edelman therefore supported moving the trial to Ada County, where a much larger population and broader jury pool offered Kohberger a better chance of receiving a trial before jurors who had not already decided the case.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://file///C:/Users/17024/Downloads/072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73503931</guid><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 06:30:05 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73503931/megaedleman1n2n3.mp3" length="36410558" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/25bf65f8-8247-4298-8126-0c633792d627/25bf65f8-8247-4298-8126-0c633792d627.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/25bf65f8-8247-4298-8126-0c633792d627/25bf65f8-8247-4298-8126-0c633792d627.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/25bf65f8-8247-4298-8126-0c633792d627/25bf65f8-8247-4298-8126-0c633792d627.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Bryan Edelman, a trial consultant retained by Bryan Kohberger’s defense, argued that the enormous volume of pretrial publicity surrounding the University of Idaho murders had made it extraordinarily difficult to find an impartial jury in Latah County....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Bryan Edelman, a trial consultant retained by Bryan Kohberger’s defense, argued that the enormous volume of pretrial publicity surrounding the University of Idaho murders had made it extraordinarily difficult to find an impartial jury in Latah County. Edelman conducted telephone surveys of hundreds of prospective jurors and found widespread familiarity with the case, substantial exposure to inflammatory or disputed media claims and a strong tendency among respondents to believe Kohberger was guilty before hearing the evidence. He maintained that repeated reporting about the knife-sheath DNA, Kohberger’s vehicle, cellphone data, alleged stalking and other incriminating details had created fixed impressions in the community, even though some of those claims remained contested or potentially inadmissible. In Edelman’s view, Kohberger would have entered a Latah County courtroom already burdened with disproving conclusions that prospective jurors had formed from months of publicity.<br /><br />Edelman also defended the defense team’s controversial public-opinion survey, explaining that its purpose had been to measure what residents had already heard and how that information affected their attitudes, not to persuade or contaminate them. He argued that ordinary jury questioning would not necessarily uncover the full extent of bias because prospective jurors might forget, minimize or fail to disclose the information they had absorbed. His declaration concluded that expanding the jury pool or relying on voir dire would not adequately cure the problem in a small community so closely connected to the victims, the university and the investigation. Edelman therefore supported moving the trial to Ada County, where a much larger population and broader jury pool offered Kohberger a better chance of receiving a trial before jurors who had not already decided the case.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://file///C:/Users/17024/Downloads/072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2276</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Murder In Moscow:  Did Kohberger Return To The Crime Scene The Next Morning?</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-did-kohberger-return-to-the-crime-scene-the-next-morning--73502060</link><description><![CDATA[A former FBI agent had said Bryan Kohberger may have returned to the neighborhood surrounding the King Road residence hours after the murders to observe the “fruits of his actions.” Cellphone data cited in the probable-cause affidavit had indicated that Kohberger’s phone traveled near the victims’ home between approximately 9:12 and 9:21 on the morning after Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin were killed. Retired FBI agent Bobby Chacon had described the alleged return as classic criminal behavior, suggesting Kohberger may have expected to see police cars, ambulances and emergency activity outside the house. Chacon had acknowledged that his explanation was speculative but said some offenders revisited crime scenes to experience the excitement or witness the consequences of what they had done.<br /><br />Chacon had also considered whether Kohberger may have returned to recover the knife sheath that investigators later found beside Madison Mogen’s body, although he believed that explanation was less likely. He had suggested Kohberger may have seen the surviving roommate who encountered a masked man inside the house but continued toward the exit because she was not part of his alleged plan and he was physically exhausted after the attacks. According to Chacon, the killer may have experienced an adrenaline crash following the violence and focused entirely on escaping. His comments had attempted to explain Kohberger’s alleged movements and behavior, but they had represented an expert interpretation rather than a conclusion established by the affidavit itself.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/bryan-kohberger-drove-by-to-see-fruits-of-his-actions-ex-fbi-agent-says/ar-AA167VwD?ocid=msedgntp&amp;cvid=e4dc57cb42584b2cb12ba8920a5b5450" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bryan Kohberger Drove By To See 'Fruits of His Actions,' Ex-FBI Agent Says (msn.com)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73502060</guid><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73502060/kohreturncrime.mp3" length="11469678" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8cee4c76-82a0-4871-b1cf-3bb7b20fd316/8cee4c76-82a0-4871-b1cf-3bb7b20fd316.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8cee4c76-82a0-4871-b1cf-3bb7b20fd316/8cee4c76-82a0-4871-b1cf-3bb7b20fd316.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8cee4c76-82a0-4871-b1cf-3bb7b20fd316/8cee4c76-82a0-4871-b1cf-3bb7b20fd316.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A former FBI agent had said Bryan Kohberger may have returned to the neighborhood surrounding the King Road residence hours after the murders to observe the “fruits of his actions.” Cellphone data cited in the probable-cause affidavit had indicated...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A former FBI agent had said Bryan Kohberger may have returned to the neighborhood surrounding the King Road residence hours after the murders to observe the “fruits of his actions.” Cellphone data cited in the probable-cause affidavit had indicated that Kohberger’s phone traveled near the victims’ home between approximately 9:12 and 9:21 on the morning after Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin were killed. Retired FBI agent Bobby Chacon had described the alleged return as classic criminal behavior, suggesting Kohberger may have expected to see police cars, ambulances and emergency activity outside the house. Chacon had acknowledged that his explanation was speculative but said some offenders revisited crime scenes to experience the excitement or witness the consequences of what they had done.<br /><br />Chacon had also considered whether Kohberger may have returned to recover the knife sheath that investigators later found beside Madison Mogen’s body, although he believed that explanation was less likely. He had suggested Kohberger may have seen the surviving roommate who encountered a masked man inside the house but continued toward the exit because she was not part of his alleged plan and he was physically exhausted after the attacks. According to Chacon, the killer may have experienced an adrenaline crash following the violence and focused entirely on escaping. His comments had attempted to explain Kohberger’s alleged movements and behavior, but they had represented an expert interpretation rather than a conclusion established by the affidavit itself.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/bryan-kohberger-drove-by-to-see-fruits-of-his-actions-ex-fbi-agent-says/ar-AA167VwD?ocid=msedgntp&amp;cvid=e4dc57cb42584b2cb12ba8920a5b5450" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bryan Kohberger Drove By To See 'Fruits of His Actions,' Ex-FBI Agent Says (msn.com)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>717</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Murder In Moscow: Would The DNA Evidence Against  Kohberger Have Been Enough To Convict Him?</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-would-the-dna-evidence-against-kohberger-have-been-enough-to-convict-him--73501815</link><description><![CDATA[A forensic expert had cautioned that the DNA reportedly linking Bryan Kohberger to the knife sheath found at the University of Idaho murder scene would not, by itself, have been enough to secure a conviction. The genetic material could have established that Kohberger had handled the sheath at some point, but it would not necessarily have proved when, where or under what circumstances his DNA was deposited. The expert had stressed that prosecutors still needed to place the evidence within a broader narrative connecting Kohberger directly to the killings of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin.<br /><br />The prosecution’s case had therefore depended on corroborating evidence, including surveillance footage of a white Hyundai Elantra near the victims’ home, cellphone records showing Kohberger’s movements, witness testimony and any additional forensic evidence recovered during searches of his property. The expert had explained that jurors would have evaluated the totality of that evidence rather than treating the DNA as an automatic declaration of guilt. Although the sheath evidence had represented a potentially powerful link to Kohberger, prosecutors still would have needed to eliminate innocent-transfer explanations and prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he had committed the four murders.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://nypost.com/2023/11/12/news/dna-evidence-alone-is-not-enough-to-convict-bryan-kohberger-trial-expert/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">DNA evidence alone is not enough to convict Bryan Kohberger: trial expert (nypost.com)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73501815</guid><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73501815/dnastrongkoh.mp3" length="10817244" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e6143e13-a5c7-40b9-895a-639fc2dbdec0/e6143e13-a5c7-40b9-895a-639fc2dbdec0.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e6143e13-a5c7-40b9-895a-639fc2dbdec0/e6143e13-a5c7-40b9-895a-639fc2dbdec0.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e6143e13-a5c7-40b9-895a-639fc2dbdec0/e6143e13-a5c7-40b9-895a-639fc2dbdec0.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A forensic expert had cautioned that the DNA reportedly linking Bryan Kohberger to the knife sheath found at the University of Idaho murder scene would not, by itself, have been enough to secure a conviction. The genetic material could have...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A forensic expert had cautioned that the DNA reportedly linking Bryan Kohberger to the knife sheath found at the University of Idaho murder scene would not, by itself, have been enough to secure a conviction. The genetic material could have established that Kohberger had handled the sheath at some point, but it would not necessarily have proved when, where or under what circumstances his DNA was deposited. The expert had stressed that prosecutors still needed to place the evidence within a broader narrative connecting Kohberger directly to the killings of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin.<br /><br />The prosecution’s case had therefore depended on corroborating evidence, including surveillance footage of a white Hyundai Elantra near the victims’ home, cellphone records showing Kohberger’s movements, witness testimony and any additional forensic evidence recovered during searches of his property. The expert had explained that jurors would have evaluated the totality of that evidence rather than treating the DNA as an automatic declaration of guilt. Although the sheath evidence had represented a potentially powerful link to Kohberger, prosecutors still would have needed to eliminate innocent-transfer explanations and prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he had committed the four murders.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://nypost.com/2023/11/12/news/dna-evidence-alone-is-not-enough-to-convict-bryan-kohberger-trial-expert/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">DNA evidence alone is not enough to convict Bryan Kohberger: trial expert (nypost.com)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>677</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Utah’s Memorandum for Binding Tyler Robinson Over for Trial (Part 2) (8/4/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/utah-s-memorandum-for-binding-tyler-robinson-over-for-trial-part-2-8-4-26--73407462</link><description><![CDATA[Utah prosecutors argued in their bindover memorandum that the evidence presented during Tyler Robinson’s five-day preliminary hearing easily established probable cause for him to stand trial on all seven charges connected to the killing of Charlie Kirk. The state pointed to Robinson’s alleged admissions to his roommate, Lance Twiggs, and several friends, including messages in which he reportedly acknowledged shooting Kirk, described planning the attack for more than a week and discussed retrieving or concealing the rifle. Prosecutors maintained that those statements were reinforced by surveillance footage allegedly tracking Robinson onto the roof of Utah Valley University’s Losee Center, eyewitness testimony and DNA evidence connecting him to the rifle recovered near the campus. The memorandum emphasized that the state was not required to prove Robinson’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt at this stage, only that there was sufficient evidence to reasonably believe he committed the crimes.<br /><br />The state asked Judge Tony Graf Jr. to bind Robinson over for trial on aggravated murder and the remaining charges, which included felony discharge of a firearm, obstruction of justice, witness tampering and committing a violent offense in the presence of a child. Prosecutors also defended the victim-targeting enhancement, arguing that Robinson allegedly selected Kirk because of Kirk’s political and religious positions, particularly his views concerning gender and sexuality. According to the state, Robinson’s alleged statements showed both an intent to kill and a motive rooted in hostility toward Kirk’s beliefs, while his purported efforts to hide the weapon and influence Twiggs supported the additional charges. Calling the matter one of the most straightforward bindover decisions the court was likely to encounter, prosecutors concluded that the combined admissions, forensic evidence, videos and witness accounts supported sending every count to trial.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73407462</guid><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73407462/robinsonbindingmemo2.mp3" length="14907394" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0569ae3f-f1c5-490e-a226-ab0029473ab8/0569ae3f-f1c5-490e-a226-ab0029473ab8.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0569ae3f-f1c5-490e-a226-ab0029473ab8/0569ae3f-f1c5-490e-a226-ab0029473ab8.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0569ae3f-f1c5-490e-a226-ab0029473ab8/0569ae3f-f1c5-490e-a226-ab0029473ab8.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Utah prosecutors argued in their bindover memorandum that the evidence presented during Tyler Robinson’s five-day preliminary hearing easily established probable cause for him to stand trial on all seven charges connected to the killing of Charlie...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Utah prosecutors argued in their bindover memorandum that the evidence presented during Tyler Robinson’s five-day preliminary hearing easily established probable cause for him to stand trial on all seven charges connected to the killing of Charlie Kirk. The state pointed to Robinson’s alleged admissions to his roommate, Lance Twiggs, and several friends, including messages in which he reportedly acknowledged shooting Kirk, described planning the attack for more than a week and discussed retrieving or concealing the rifle. Prosecutors maintained that those statements were reinforced by surveillance footage allegedly tracking Robinson onto the roof of Utah Valley University’s Losee Center, eyewitness testimony and DNA evidence connecting him to the rifle recovered near the campus. The memorandum emphasized that the state was not required to prove Robinson’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt at this stage, only that there was sufficient evidence to reasonably believe he committed the crimes.<br /><br />The state asked Judge Tony Graf Jr. to bind Robinson over for trial on aggravated murder and the remaining charges, which included felony discharge of a firearm, obstruction of justice, witness tampering and committing a violent offense in the presence of a child. Prosecutors also defended the victim-targeting enhancement, arguing that Robinson allegedly selected Kirk because of Kirk’s political and religious positions, particularly his views concerning gender and sexuality. According to the state, Robinson’s alleged statements showed both an intent to kill and a motive rooted in hostility toward Kirk’s beliefs, while his purported efforts to hide the weapon and influence Twiggs supported the additional charges. Calling the matter one of the most straightforward bindover decisions the court was likely to encounter, prosecutors concluded that the combined admissions, forensic evidence, videos and witness accounts supported sending every count to trial.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>932</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvu</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Kathy Ruemmler And Her Epstein Related Transcript From Her Trip To Congress (Part 4) (8/5/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/kathy-ruemmler-and-her-epstein-related-transcript-from-her-trip-to-congress-part-4-8-5-26--73451697</link><description><![CDATA[Kathy Ruemmler told congressional investigators that she regretted associating with Jeffrey Epstein but maintained that she did not know he was continuing to abuse girls and young women after his 2008 conviction. The former Obama White House counsel acknowledged meeting with Epstein repeatedly, visiting his properties, exchanging numerous emails with him and accepting professional assistance and gifts, while portraying the relationship as largely intellectual and social. She said Epstein introduced her to prominent figures and discussed legal, political and financial matters with her, but denied representing him in criminal matters or helping conceal his misconduct. Ruemmler also argued that Epstein had misled her about the seriousness of his past crimes, an explanation that left investigators questioning why an experienced former federal prosecutor remained close to a registered sex offender.<br /><br />The most damaging portion of Ruemmler’s testimony concerned Virginia Giuffre. Ruemmler said some of Giuffre’s allegations “lacked inherent credibility” and was questioned about a 2015 email in which she discussed whether counterclaims could be brought against Giuffre while Giuffre was suing Ghislaine Maxwell. Ruemmler claimed she did not remember the message and suggested she may merely have been responding conversationally to Epstein rather than actively developing a legal strategy against Giuffre. She said she had no reason to doubt that Giuffre had been abused, yet stopped short of affirming that Epstein and Maxwell had victimized her. Taken together, the testimony showed Ruemmler attempting to minimize her role and distance herself from Epstein while struggling to explain why she maintained such a close relationship with him and appeared willing to question one of his most prominent accusers.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Ruemmler-Final-Transcript_Redact-7.28.26.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ruemmler-Final-Transcript_Redact-7.28.26.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73451697</guid><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73451697/ruemmler4.mp3" length="11992546" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1763012d-65fe-44b9-8a7d-70a39c7bee6a/1763012d-65fe-44b9-8a7d-70a39c7bee6a.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1763012d-65fe-44b9-8a7d-70a39c7bee6a/1763012d-65fe-44b9-8a7d-70a39c7bee6a.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1763012d-65fe-44b9-8a7d-70a39c7bee6a/1763012d-65fe-44b9-8a7d-70a39c7bee6a.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Kathy Ruemmler told congressional investigators that she regretted associating with Jeffrey Epstein but maintained that she did not know he was continuing to abuse girls and young women after his 2008 conviction. The former Obama White House counsel...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Kathy Ruemmler told congressional investigators that she regretted associating with Jeffrey Epstein but maintained that she did not know he was continuing to abuse girls and young women after his 2008 conviction. The former Obama White House counsel acknowledged meeting with Epstein repeatedly, visiting his properties, exchanging numerous emails with him and accepting professional assistance and gifts, while portraying the relationship as largely intellectual and social. She said Epstein introduced her to prominent figures and discussed legal, political and financial matters with her, but denied representing him in criminal matters or helping conceal his misconduct. Ruemmler also argued that Epstein had misled her about the seriousness of his past crimes, an explanation that left investigators questioning why an experienced former federal prosecutor remained close to a registered sex offender.<br /><br />The most damaging portion of Ruemmler’s testimony concerned Virginia Giuffre. Ruemmler said some of Giuffre’s allegations “lacked inherent credibility” and was questioned about a 2015 email in which she discussed whether counterclaims could be brought against Giuffre while Giuffre was suing Ghislaine Maxwell. Ruemmler claimed she did not remember the message and suggested she may merely have been responding conversationally to Epstein rather than actively developing a legal strategy against Giuffre. She said she had no reason to doubt that Giuffre had been abused, yet stopped short of affirming that Epstein and Maxwell had victimized her. Taken together, the testimony showed Ruemmler attempting to minimize her role and distance herself from Epstein while struggling to explain why she maintained such a close relationship with him and appeared willing to question one of his most prominent accusers.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Ruemmler-Final-Transcript_Redact-7.28.26.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ruemmler-Final-Transcript_Redact-7.28.26.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>750</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Kathy Ruemmler And Her Epstein Related Transcript From Her Trip To Congress (Part 3) (8/5/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/kathy-ruemmler-and-her-epstein-related-transcript-from-her-trip-to-congress-part-3-8-5-26--73451698</link><description><![CDATA[Kathy Ruemmler told congressional investigators that she regretted associating with Jeffrey Epstein but maintained that she did not know he was continuing to abuse girls and young women after his 2008 conviction. The former Obama White House counsel acknowledged meeting with Epstein repeatedly, visiting his properties, exchanging numerous emails with him and accepting professional assistance and gifts, while portraying the relationship as largely intellectual and social. She said Epstein introduced her to prominent figures and discussed legal, political and financial matters with her, but denied representing him in criminal matters or helping conceal his misconduct. Ruemmler also argued that Epstein had misled her about the seriousness of his past crimes, an explanation that left investigators questioning why an experienced former federal prosecutor remained close to a registered sex offender.<br /><br />The most damaging portion of Ruemmler’s testimony concerned Virginia Giuffre. Ruemmler said some of Giuffre’s allegations “lacked inherent credibility” and was questioned about a 2015 email in which she discussed whether counterclaims could be brought against Giuffre while Giuffre was suing Ghislaine Maxwell. Ruemmler claimed she did not remember the message and suggested she may merely have been responding conversationally to Epstein rather than actively developing a legal strategy against Giuffre. She said she had no reason to doubt that Giuffre had been abused, yet stopped short of affirming that Epstein and Maxwell had victimized her. Taken together, the testimony showed Ruemmler attempting to minimize her role and distance herself from Epstein while struggling to explain why she maintained such a close relationship with him and appeared willing to question one of his most prominent accusers.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Ruemmler-Final-Transcript_Redact-7.28.26.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ruemmler-Final-Transcript_Redact-7.28.26.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73451698</guid><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 20:30:01 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73451698/ruemmler3.mp3" length="14254542" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/27afe10c-a20a-42c9-adbb-764a096ced17/27afe10c-a20a-42c9-adbb-764a096ced17.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/27afe10c-a20a-42c9-adbb-764a096ced17/27afe10c-a20a-42c9-adbb-764a096ced17.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/27afe10c-a20a-42c9-adbb-764a096ced17/27afe10c-a20a-42c9-adbb-764a096ced17.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Kathy Ruemmler told congressional investigators that she regretted associating with Jeffrey Epstein but maintained that she did not know he was continuing to abuse girls and young women after his 2008 conviction. The former Obama White House counsel...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Kathy Ruemmler told congressional investigators that she regretted associating with Jeffrey Epstein but maintained that she did not know he was continuing to abuse girls and young women after his 2008 conviction. The former Obama White House counsel acknowledged meeting with Epstein repeatedly, visiting his properties, exchanging numerous emails with him and accepting professional assistance and gifts, while portraying the relationship as largely intellectual and social. She said Epstein introduced her to prominent figures and discussed legal, political and financial matters with her, but denied representing him in criminal matters or helping conceal his misconduct. Ruemmler also argued that Epstein had misled her about the seriousness of his past crimes, an explanation that left investigators questioning why an experienced former federal prosecutor remained close to a registered sex offender.<br /><br />The most damaging portion of Ruemmler’s testimony concerned Virginia Giuffre. Ruemmler said some of Giuffre’s allegations “lacked inherent credibility” and was questioned about a 2015 email in which she discussed whether counterclaims could be brought against Giuffre while Giuffre was suing Ghislaine Maxwell. Ruemmler claimed she did not remember the message and suggested she may merely have been responding conversationally to Epstein rather than actively developing a legal strategy against Giuffre. She said she had no reason to doubt that Giuffre had been abused, yet stopped short of affirming that Epstein and Maxwell had victimized her. Taken together, the testimony showed Ruemmler attempting to minimize her role and distance herself from Epstein while struggling to explain why she maintained such a close relationship with him and appeared willing to question one of his most prominent accusers.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Ruemmler-Final-Transcript_Redact-7.28.26.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ruemmler-Final-Transcript_Redact-7.28.26.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>891</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Murder In Moscow:   The Long Legal Road Behind Kohberger’s Latest Filing (Part 1) (8/5/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-the-long-legal-road-behind-kohberger-s-latest-filing-part-1-8-5-26--73508252</link><description><![CDATA[Bryan Kohberger pleaded guilty in July 2025 to murdering University of Idaho students Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin, avoiding the death penalty in exchange for four consecutive life sentences without parole. The agreement ended years of litigation over DNA found on a knife sheath, surveillance footage of a white Hyundai Elantra, cellphone records, witness testimony, genetic genealogy, and other evidence prosecutors said connected him to the King Road residence. During the plea hearing, Kohberger told the court that he understood the charges, was satisfied with his attorneys, was acting voluntarily, and was pleading guilty because he was guilty. The deal spared the victims’ families from a lengthy capital trial, but it did not answer the lingering questions about motive, the missing murder weapon, or why the four students were targeted.<br /><br />Kohberger is now seeking post-conviction relief and asking the court to allow him to withdraw those guilty pleas. He claims his former attorneys pressured him into falsely confessing, misled him about death-row and prison conditions, provided ineffective representation, and failed to properly disclose or explain potentially exculpatory evidence. His newly appointed attorney, Greg Rauch, is reviewing those allegations, while Idaho prosecutors are defending the convictions and emphasizing Kohberger’s sworn courtroom admissions and the substantial evidence against him. The court has not ruled that his claims are credible, and Kohberger must meet the demanding post-sentencing standard of proving a manifest injustice. Even if he succeeds, he would not be released automatically, because the murder charges could return, the case could proceed to trial, and prosecutors might seek to restore the death penalty.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73508252</guid><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 18:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73508252/kohbergerstatus1.mp3" length="12121278" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5218c849-d0cb-46b3-83d7-86a994ae9c73/5218c849-d0cb-46b3-83d7-86a994ae9c73.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5218c849-d0cb-46b3-83d7-86a994ae9c73/5218c849-d0cb-46b3-83d7-86a994ae9c73.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5218c849-d0cb-46b3-83d7-86a994ae9c73/5218c849-d0cb-46b3-83d7-86a994ae9c73.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Bryan Kohberger pleaded guilty in July 2025 to murdering University of Idaho students Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin, avoiding the death penalty in exchange for four consecutive life sentences without parole. The...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Bryan Kohberger pleaded guilty in July 2025 to murdering University of Idaho students Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin, avoiding the death penalty in exchange for four consecutive life sentences without parole. The agreement ended years of litigation over DNA found on a knife sheath, surveillance footage of a white Hyundai Elantra, cellphone records, witness testimony, genetic genealogy, and other evidence prosecutors said connected him to the King Road residence. During the plea hearing, Kohberger told the court that he understood the charges, was satisfied with his attorneys, was acting voluntarily, and was pleading guilty because he was guilty. The deal spared the victims’ families from a lengthy capital trial, but it did not answer the lingering questions about motive, the missing murder weapon, or why the four students were targeted.<br /><br />Kohberger is now seeking post-conviction relief and asking the court to allow him to withdraw those guilty pleas. He claims his former attorneys pressured him into falsely confessing, misled him about death-row and prison conditions, provided ineffective representation, and failed to properly disclose or explain potentially exculpatory evidence. His newly appointed attorney, Greg Rauch, is reviewing those allegations, while Idaho prosecutors are defending the convictions and emphasizing Kohberger’s sworn courtroom admissions and the substantial evidence against him. The court has not ruled that his claims are credible, and Kohberger must meet the demanding post-sentencing standard of proving a manifest injustice. Even if he succeeds, he would not be released automatically, because the murder charges could return, the case could proceed to trial, and prosecutors might seek to restore the death penalty.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>758</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Epstein Truth Commission Drawn Into New Mexico’s Political Fight (8/5/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/epstein-truth-commission-drawn-into-new-mexico-s-political-fight-8-5-26--73451668</link><description><![CDATA[New Mexico Senate Republicans, led by Minority Leader Bill Sharer, called on the state’s bipartisan Epstein Survivors’ Truth Commission to subpoena Democratic gubernatorial candidate Deb Haaland and U.S. Rep. Melanie Stansbury. Sharer pointed to a 2014 campaign flight Haaland took on an aircraft arranged through Epstein and to an alleged connection between one of Stansbury’s former employers and Ghislaine Maxwell. Haaland’s campaign said she never interacted with Epstein and did not know how the flight had been arranged, while Stansbury categorically denied having any relationship with Epstein or Maxwell and said she was willing to testify. Independent reporting had also found that the aircraft Haaland used was not Epstein’s personal plane, undercutting Sharer’s more inflammatory characterization of the trip.<br /><br />Sharer framed the subpoena request as a test of whether the commission was genuinely nonpartisan, but his motivation deserved skepticism. The commission had been created to investigate alleged abuse, institutional failures and public corruption connected to Epstein’s Zorro Ranch, yet Sharer’s demands focused heavily on two prominent Democrats, including one running for governor, while relying on connections that appeared indirect or disputed. Seeking testimony from anyone with potentially relevant knowledge was reasonable, but describing Haaland as having flown on “Jeffrey Epstein’s private jet” and suggesting that Stansbury had meaningful Epstein ties went beyond what the publicly established facts supported. That made the effort look at least partly like an attempt to weaponize the Epstein investigation for partisan advantage rather than a narrowly tailored effort to uncover what happened at Zorro Ranch and why authorities failed to act.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73451668</guid><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73451668/newmexicocomissionfight.mp3" length="12654594" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8cb33c0b-c67e-4fbd-a423-48255f2db245/8cb33c0b-c67e-4fbd-a423-48255f2db245.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8cb33c0b-c67e-4fbd-a423-48255f2db245/8cb33c0b-c67e-4fbd-a423-48255f2db245.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8cb33c0b-c67e-4fbd-a423-48255f2db245/8cb33c0b-c67e-4fbd-a423-48255f2db245.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>New Mexico Senate Republicans, led by Minority Leader Bill Sharer, called on the state’s bipartisan Epstein Survivors’ Truth Commission to subpoena Democratic gubernatorial candidate Deb Haaland and U.S. Rep. Melanie Stansbury. Sharer pointed to a...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[New Mexico Senate Republicans, led by Minority Leader Bill Sharer, called on the state’s bipartisan Epstein Survivors’ Truth Commission to subpoena Democratic gubernatorial candidate Deb Haaland and U.S. Rep. Melanie Stansbury. Sharer pointed to a 2014 campaign flight Haaland took on an aircraft arranged through Epstein and to an alleged connection between one of Stansbury’s former employers and Ghislaine Maxwell. Haaland’s campaign said she never interacted with Epstein and did not know how the flight had been arranged, while Stansbury categorically denied having any relationship with Epstein or Maxwell and said she was willing to testify. Independent reporting had also found that the aircraft Haaland used was not Epstein’s personal plane, undercutting Sharer’s more inflammatory characterization of the trip.<br /><br />Sharer framed the subpoena request as a test of whether the commission was genuinely nonpartisan, but his motivation deserved skepticism. The commission had been created to investigate alleged abuse, institutional failures and public corruption connected to Epstein’s Zorro Ranch, yet Sharer’s demands focused heavily on two prominent Democrats, including one running for governor, while relying on connections that appeared indirect or disputed. Seeking testimony from anyone with potentially relevant knowledge was reasonable, but describing Haaland as having flown on “Jeffrey Epstein’s private jet” and suggesting that Stansbury had meaningful Epstein ties went beyond what the publicly established facts supported. That made the effort look at least partly like an attempt to weaponize the Epstein investigation for partisan advantage rather than a narrowly tailored effort to uncover what happened at Zorro Ranch and why authorities failed to act.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>791</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Congress Moves to Give the Epstein Files Law Real Enforcement Power (8/5/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/congress-moves-to-give-the-epstein-files-law-real-enforcement-power-8-5-26--73451670</link><description><![CDATA[A bipartisan group of lawmakers introduced the Epstein Files Transparency Act II after the Justice Department repeatedly missed deadlines and faced accusations that its releases under the original law were incomplete, heavily redacted and improperly exposed survivors’ personal information while concealing the identities of men potentially connected to Epstein’s abuse. The proposed legislation would give survivors, members of Congress, state attorneys general and local prosecutors standing to sue the Justice Department for failing to release required records. It would also allow survivors to obtain complete, unredacted records concerning their own cases and give state and local authorities access to materials needed for investigations and prosecutions, including classified information through secure channels.<br /><br />The new bill was designed to add enforcement powers that critics said were missing from the original Epstein Files Transparency Act, including potential criminal penalties for Justice Department or FBI officials who knowingly concealed, destroyed, falsified or withheld records. Legal experts said the legislation could become a significant tool for survivors and state investigators, but questioned whether it could attract enough votes in Congress, whether President Donald Trump would sign it and whether another law would actually force cooperation from the same Justice Department accused of resisting disclosure. Supporters, including Thomas Massie, Ro Khanna, Jeff Merkley, Ben Ray Luján and Teresa Leger Fernández, argued that stronger legal consequences were necessary because the administration had failed to comply fully with the original transparency mandate.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73451670</guid><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73451670/pushforanupdatedefta.mp3" length="10572321" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c737b2f8-2a70-437b-8045-88f6459572e6/c737b2f8-2a70-437b-8045-88f6459572e6.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c737b2f8-2a70-437b-8045-88f6459572e6/c737b2f8-2a70-437b-8045-88f6459572e6.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c737b2f8-2a70-437b-8045-88f6459572e6/c737b2f8-2a70-437b-8045-88f6459572e6.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A bipartisan group of lawmakers introduced the Epstein Files Transparency Act II after the Justice Department repeatedly missed deadlines and faced accusations that its releases under the original law were incomplete, heavily redacted and improperly...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A bipartisan group of lawmakers introduced the Epstein Files Transparency Act II after the Justice Department repeatedly missed deadlines and faced accusations that its releases under the original law were incomplete, heavily redacted and improperly exposed survivors’ personal information while concealing the identities of men potentially connected to Epstein’s abuse. The proposed legislation would give survivors, members of Congress, state attorneys general and local prosecutors standing to sue the Justice Department for failing to release required records. It would also allow survivors to obtain complete, unredacted records concerning their own cases and give state and local authorities access to materials needed for investigations and prosecutions, including classified information through secure channels.<br /><br />The new bill was designed to add enforcement powers that critics said were missing from the original Epstein Files Transparency Act, including potential criminal penalties for Justice Department or FBI officials who knowingly concealed, destroyed, falsified or withheld records. Legal experts said the legislation could become a significant tool for survivors and state investigators, but questioned whether it could attract enough votes in Congress, whether President Donald Trump would sign it and whether another law would actually force cooperation from the same Justice Department accused of resisting disclosure. Supporters, including Thomas Massie, Ro Khanna, Jeff Merkley, Ben Ray Luján and Teresa Leger Fernández, argued that stronger legal consequences were necessary because the administration had failed to comply fully with the original transparency mandate.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>661</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The DOJ Continues To Refuse To Turn Over Epstein Documents To The State Of New Mexico (8/4/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-doj-continues-to-refuse-to-turn-over-epstein-documents-to-the-state-of-new-mexico-8-4-26--73407551</link><description><![CDATA[The Justice Department has still not turned over the unredacted Jeffrey Epstein records requested by New Mexico investigators, missing a July 31 deadline imposed by state Attorney General Raúl Torrez. New Mexico reopened its criminal investigation into allegations of sexual abuse and trafficking at Epstein’s Zorro Ranch earlier this year, but the federal government has provided only 31 pages of largely useless material, including heavily redacted records, previously public documents and photocopies of local news reports. Torrez says the withheld files potentially contain the identities of survivors, witnesses, co-conspirators and other individuals who could help investigators determine what crimes occurred at the ranch and whether anyone can still be prosecuted.<br /><br />The standoff is especially troubling because New Mexico says it suspended its original investigation in 2019 after reaching an agreement with the Southern District of New York, which was supposed to share evidence gathered during the federal Epstein investigation. State officials now say the federal government never honored that commitment. Although the DOJ argues that federal law, court orders and privacy protections prevent it from releasing millions of unredacted documents, New Mexico maintains that prosecutors could seek modifications to protective orders and securely provide the relevant evidence to state law enforcement. Torrez has accused the department of obstructing the investigation and has left open the possibility of taking legal action to force the federal government to cooperate.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73407551</guid><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73407551/dojstillstonewallingnewmexico.mp3" length="12195257" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cf054354-8013-4115-beb5-34c4280f88fa/cf054354-8013-4115-beb5-34c4280f88fa.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cf054354-8013-4115-beb5-34c4280f88fa/cf054354-8013-4115-beb5-34c4280f88fa.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cf054354-8013-4115-beb5-34c4280f88fa/cf054354-8013-4115-beb5-34c4280f88fa.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Justice Department has still not turned over the unredacted Jeffrey Epstein records requested by New Mexico investigators, missing a July 31 deadline imposed by state Attorney General Raúl Torrez. New Mexico reopened its criminal investigation...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Justice Department has still not turned over the unredacted Jeffrey Epstein records requested by New Mexico investigators, missing a July 31 deadline imposed by state Attorney General Raúl Torrez. New Mexico reopened its criminal investigation into allegations of sexual abuse and trafficking at Epstein’s Zorro Ranch earlier this year, but the federal government has provided only 31 pages of largely useless material, including heavily redacted records, previously public documents and photocopies of local news reports. Torrez says the withheld files potentially contain the identities of survivors, witnesses, co-conspirators and other individuals who could help investigators determine what crimes occurred at the ranch and whether anyone can still be prosecuted.<br /><br />The standoff is especially troubling because New Mexico says it suspended its original investigation in 2019 after reaching an agreement with the Southern District of New York, which was supposed to share evidence gathered during the federal Epstein investigation. State officials now say the federal government never honored that commitment. Although the DOJ argues that federal law, court orders and privacy protections prevent it from releasing millions of unredacted documents, New Mexico maintains that prosecutors could seek modifications to protective orders and securely provide the relevant evidence to state law enforcement. Torrez has accused the department of obstructing the investigation and has left open the possibility of taking legal action to force the federal government to cooperate.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>763</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  A Former Prosecutor And Resident At 1122 Discuss The Floorplan (8/4/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-a-former-prosecutor-and-resident-at-1122-discuss-the-floorplan-8-4-26--73397109</link><description><![CDATA[Former Idaho attorney general and prosecutor Dave Leroy believed the killer likely entered and escaped through a rear entrance on the upper side of the King Road residence. Because the house had been built against a hill, that entrance provided relatively direct access to the second and third floors, where Ethan Chapin, Xana Kernodle, Madison Mogen and Kaylee Goncalves were killed. Leroy suggested that this route could have allowed the attacker to reach the victims without moving through the lowest level of the house, potentially explaining why the surviving roommates downstairs were not physically harmed. However, he acknowledged that his reconstruction had been speculative and that investigators possessed far more information about the killer’s movements.<br /><br />Former tenant Cole Alteneder said the residence had been old and creaky, with footsteps and movement often audible across its different floors. He explained that the home’s unusual multilevel design, staircases and wooden flooring made it difficult for someone to move around completely unnoticed, while its history as a popular gathering place meant that many University of Idaho students were familiar with the property’s layout and entrances. His account raised additional questions about what noises might have been heard during the killings, although it did not establish how loud the attack had been, what the surviving roommates actually heard or whether any sounds would have been immediately recognized as evidence of a violent crime.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73397109</guid><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73397109/megakingroadhouseformerresidentbodycamcole.mp3" length="32976605" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f077aa00-a564-49fc-864b-47f1cfc89bb9/f077aa00-a564-49fc-864b-47f1cfc89bb9.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f077aa00-a564-49fc-864b-47f1cfc89bb9/f077aa00-a564-49fc-864b-47f1cfc89bb9.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f077aa00-a564-49fc-864b-47f1cfc89bb9/f077aa00-a564-49fc-864b-47f1cfc89bb9.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Former Idaho attorney general and prosecutor Dave Leroy believed the killer likely entered and escaped through a rear entrance on the upper side of the King Road residence. Because the house had been built against a hill, that entrance provided...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Former Idaho attorney general and prosecutor Dave Leroy believed the killer likely entered and escaped through a rear entrance on the upper side of the King Road residence. Because the house had been built against a hill, that entrance provided relatively direct access to the second and third floors, where Ethan Chapin, Xana Kernodle, Madison Mogen and Kaylee Goncalves were killed. Leroy suggested that this route could have allowed the attacker to reach the victims without moving through the lowest level of the house, potentially explaining why the surviving roommates downstairs were not physically harmed. However, he acknowledged that his reconstruction had been speculative and that investigators possessed far more information about the killer’s movements.<br /><br />Former tenant Cole Alteneder said the residence had been old and creaky, with footsteps and movement often audible across its different floors. He explained that the home’s unusual multilevel design, staircases and wooden flooring made it difficult for someone to move around completely unnoticed, while its history as a popular gathering place meant that many University of Idaho students were familiar with the property’s layout and entrances. His account raised additional questions about what noises might have been heard during the killings, although it did not establish how loud the attack had been, what the surviving roommates actually heard or whether any sounds would have been immediately recognized as evidence of a violent crime.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2062</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Bryan Kohberger And Death Penalty Debate During The Lead Up To The Plea (8/4/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-death-penalty-debate-during-the-lead-up-to-the-plea-8-4-26--73446564</link><description><![CDATA[In the years leading up to Bryan Kohberger’s scheduled trial, the death penalty became one of the most contentious issues surrounding the case. Prosecutors had announced that they intended to seek execution if Kohberger were convicted of murdering Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, while his defense repeatedly challenged whether capital punishment should remain available. The defense argued that procedural problems, constitutional concerns and the extraordinary publicity surrounding the case made a death sentence inappropriate or unreliable. Supporters of the prosecution’s position maintained that the calculated and exceptionally brutal nature of the four killings justified Idaho’s harshest possible punishment. The prospect of a death sentence also threatened to extend the case through years of litigation and appeals, leaving the families to weigh the desire for maximum punishment against the emotional cost and uncertainty of a capital trial.<br /><br />The victims’ families did not speak with one voice on that question. Kaylee Goncalves’s family strongly supported pursuing the death penalty and viewed it as the appropriate measure of accountability, while Xana Kernodle’s father also expressed frustration when prosecutors ultimately moved away from it. Madison Mogen’s family supported a resolution that guaranteed Kohberger would remain imprisoned for life, arguing that it spared the families a graphic trial, possible mistrials and decades of appeals. Ethan Chapin’s family had largely stayed away from the courtroom battle and focused publicly on preserving Ethan’s memory, indicating that they did not want the legal process to dominate their lives. The disagreement reflected different understandings of justice rather than different levels of grief: some relatives believed execution was necessary, while others placed greater value on certainty, finality and ending the prolonged legal ordeal.<br /><br /><br />to contact me;<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73446564</guid><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 08:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73446564/megakohbergerdeathpenaltydebatedivdefamilies.mp3" length="33124981" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0f620d5f-f5f8-46d0-9009-71772a250728/0f620d5f-f5f8-46d0-9009-71772a250728.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0f620d5f-f5f8-46d0-9009-71772a250728/0f620d5f-f5f8-46d0-9009-71772a250728.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0f620d5f-f5f8-46d0-9009-71772a250728/0f620d5f-f5f8-46d0-9009-71772a250728.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In the years leading up to Bryan Kohberger’s scheduled trial, the death penalty became one of the most contentious issues surrounding the case. Prosecutors had announced that they intended to seek execution if Kohberger were convicted of murdering...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In the years leading up to Bryan Kohberger’s scheduled trial, the death penalty became one of the most contentious issues surrounding the case. Prosecutors had announced that they intended to seek execution if Kohberger were convicted of murdering Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, while his defense repeatedly challenged whether capital punishment should remain available. The defense argued that procedural problems, constitutional concerns and the extraordinary publicity surrounding the case made a death sentence inappropriate or unreliable. Supporters of the prosecution’s position maintained that the calculated and exceptionally brutal nature of the four killings justified Idaho’s harshest possible punishment. The prospect of a death sentence also threatened to extend the case through years of litigation and appeals, leaving the families to weigh the desire for maximum punishment against the emotional cost and uncertainty of a capital trial.<br /><br />The victims’ families did not speak with one voice on that question. Kaylee Goncalves’s family strongly supported pursuing the death penalty and viewed it as the appropriate measure of accountability, while Xana Kernodle’s father also expressed frustration when prosecutors ultimately moved away from it. Madison Mogen’s family supported a resolution that guaranteed Kohberger would remain imprisoned for life, arguing that it spared the families a graphic trial, possible mistrials and decades of appeals. Ethan Chapin’s family had largely stayed away from the courtroom battle and focused publicly on preserving Ethan’s memory, indicating that they did not want the legal process to dominate their lives. The disagreement reflected different understandings of justice rather than different levels of grief: some relatives believed execution was necessary, while others placed greater value on certainty, finality and ending the prolonged legal ordeal.<br /><br /><br />to contact me;<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2071</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The State Objects To Kohberger's Motion To Suppress The First Apple Warrant (8/4/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-state-objects-to-kohberger-s-motion-to-suppress-the-first-apple-warrant-8-4-26--73446563</link><description><![CDATA[In this filing dated December 6, 2024, the State of Idaho formally objects to Bryan Kohberger’s motion to suppress evidence obtained from his Apple iCloud account via a federal grand jury subpoena and a subsequent search warrant issued on August 1, 2023. Kohberger's defense claimed the searches violated his Fourth Amendment rights, but prosecutors countered that the data falls under the “third-party doctrine,” which permits law enforcement access to user data voluntarily shared with companies like Apple. The State emphasized that the Apple data acquired was limited to account subscriber information—such as email addresses and registration dates—and did not include detailed location tracking or sensitive content. This, they argue, negates any assertion that the warrant violated Kohberger's reasonable expectation of privacy.<br /><br /><br />Further, the State rebuts the claim that the search warrant lacked probable cause or specificity, asserting that the accompanying affidavit clearly outlined the basis for the request and was legally incorporated into the warrant under well-established legal standards. They cite relevant federal cases supporting their position, such as United States v. SDI Future Health, which allows an affidavit to “cure” any alleged warrant deficiencies if it is referenced and available to the executing officers. The State maintains that there were no intentional or reckless misstatements in the affidavit and urges the court to deny the suppression motion, emphasizing that all procedural safeguards were met and the information obtained was narrow in scope and lawfully collected.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.628425/gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.211.0_2.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.211.0_2.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73446563</guid><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73446563/megastateobjectskohbergersuppressapple.mp3" length="25023678" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/285bc4af-61fc-4f78-8d6e-cc2c678eee19/285bc4af-61fc-4f78-8d6e-cc2c678eee19.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/285bc4af-61fc-4f78-8d6e-cc2c678eee19/285bc4af-61fc-4f78-8d6e-cc2c678eee19.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/285bc4af-61fc-4f78-8d6e-cc2c678eee19/285bc4af-61fc-4f78-8d6e-cc2c678eee19.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In this filing dated December 6, 2024, the State of Idaho formally objects to Bryan Kohberger’s motion to suppress evidence obtained from his Apple iCloud account via a federal grand jury subpoena and a subsequent search warrant issued on August 1,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this filing dated December 6, 2024, the State of Idaho formally objects to Bryan Kohberger’s motion to suppress evidence obtained from his Apple iCloud account via a federal grand jury subpoena and a subsequent search warrant issued on August 1, 2023. Kohberger's defense claimed the searches violated his Fourth Amendment rights, but prosecutors countered that the data falls under the “third-party doctrine,” which permits law enforcement access to user data voluntarily shared with companies like Apple. The State emphasized that the Apple data acquired was limited to account subscriber information—such as email addresses and registration dates—and did not include detailed location tracking or sensitive content. This, they argue, negates any assertion that the warrant violated Kohberger's reasonable expectation of privacy.<br /><br /><br />Further, the State rebuts the claim that the search warrant lacked probable cause or specificity, asserting that the accompanying affidavit clearly outlined the basis for the request and was legally incorporated into the warrant under well-established legal standards. They cite relevant federal cases supporting their position, such as United States v. SDI Future Health, which allows an affidavit to “cure” any alleged warrant deficiencies if it is referenced and available to the executing officers. The State maintains that there were no intentional or reckless misstatements in the affidavit and urges the court to deny the suppression motion, emphasizing that all procedural safeguards were met and the information obtained was narrow in scope and lawfully collected.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.628425/gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.211.0_2.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.211.0_2.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1564</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Murder In Moscow:  How Bushy Eye Brows Helped Identify Bryan Kohberger</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-how-bushy-eye-brows-helped-identify-bryan-kohberger--73445854</link><description><![CDATA[Bryan Kohberger’s distinctive eyebrows had reportedly helped investigators identify him as a possible suspect in the killings of University of Idaho students Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. A surviving roommate had told police that she saw a masked man dressed in black leaving the King Road residence after the murders and remembered that he had “bushy eyebrows.” After an investigator examined Kohberger’s driver’s-license photograph and noticed that his appearance matched that description, authorities began looking more closely at him and his white Hyundai Elantra, which was similar to a vehicle captured near the crime scene.<br /><br />Investigators had subsequently placed Kohberger under surveillance as he traveled with his father from Washington to Pennsylvania. DNA recovered from trash taken outside his family’s home was used to establish a familial connection to genetic material found on the button of a knife sheath left beside one of the victims. Cellphone records and surveillance footage were also cited as evidence connecting him to the investigation. Kohberger’s defense had challenged the strength and handling of the evidence, maintaining at the time that the state had not demonstrated a direct connection between him and the victims and questioning the methods investigators used to build the DNA case against him.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73445854</guid><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 04:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73445854/bushyeyesled.mp3" length="12481140" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/21b6f728-cef7-47f7-9a85-c568e01c744e/21b6f728-cef7-47f7-9a85-c568e01c744e.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/21b6f728-cef7-47f7-9a85-c568e01c744e/21b6f728-cef7-47f7-9a85-c568e01c744e.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/21b6f728-cef7-47f7-9a85-c568e01c744e/21b6f728-cef7-47f7-9a85-c568e01c744e.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Bryan Kohberger’s distinctive eyebrows had reportedly helped investigators identify him as a possible suspect in the killings of University of Idaho students Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. A surviving roommate had...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Bryan Kohberger’s distinctive eyebrows had reportedly helped investigators identify him as a possible suspect in the killings of University of Idaho students Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. A surviving roommate had told police that she saw a masked man dressed in black leaving the King Road residence after the murders and remembered that he had “bushy eyebrows.” After an investigator examined Kohberger’s driver’s-license photograph and noticed that his appearance matched that description, authorities began looking more closely at him and his white Hyundai Elantra, which was similar to a vehicle captured near the crime scene.<br /><br />Investigators had subsequently placed Kohberger under surveillance as he traveled with his father from Washington to Pennsylvania. DNA recovered from trash taken outside his family’s home was used to establish a familial connection to genetic material found on the button of a knife sheath left beside one of the victims. Cellphone records and surveillance footage were also cited as evidence connecting him to the investigation. Kohberger’s defense had challenged the strength and handling of the evidence, maintaining at the time that the state had not demonstrated a direct connection between him and the victims and questioning the methods investigators used to build the DNA case against him.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>781</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Murder In Moscow:   Bryan Kohberger Pleads Guilty To All Charges Against Him</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-bryan-kohberger-pleads-guilty-to-all-charges-against-him--73445853</link><description><![CDATA[Bryan Kohberger, accused of murdering four University of Idaho students in November 2022, has reached a plea agreement with prosecutors. In exchange for pleading guilty to all four counts of first-degree murder—and additional burglary charges—he will receive four consecutive life sentences, with no possibility of parole and a waiver of all appellate rights. This deal effectively removes the death penalty—recently reinstated in Idaho with an optional firing-squad execution—from consideration, sparing Kohberger from capital punishment<br /><br /><br />The plea comes just weeks before his scheduled trial in August and is set to be formalized during a plea hearing on July 2, with sentencing expected in late July.   While prosecutors framed the deal as a way to ensure finality and spare the victims' families from prolonged appeals, the announcement provoked intense backlash. Notably, the Goncalves family—victims Kaylee Goncalves’ relatives—expressed fury over the timing and secrecy of the agreement, condemning it as a "stab in the back" and arguing that Kohberger would still "form relationships and engage with the world," unlike their loved one.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://nypost.com/2025/06/30/us-news/bryan-kohberger-to-plead-guilty-to-university-of-idaho-student-murders-to-avoid-death-penalty-report/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bryan Kohberger to plead guilty to University of Idaho student murders to avoid death penalty: report</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73445853</guid><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73445853/kohbergeracceptsplea.mp3" length="13015293" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a445e413-abc6-4b54-9c89-3cf7bc093a50/a445e413-abc6-4b54-9c89-3cf7bc093a50.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a445e413-abc6-4b54-9c89-3cf7bc093a50/a445e413-abc6-4b54-9c89-3cf7bc093a50.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a445e413-abc6-4b54-9c89-3cf7bc093a50/a445e413-abc6-4b54-9c89-3cf7bc093a50.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Bryan Kohberger, accused of murdering four University of Idaho students in November 2022, has reached a plea agreement with prosecutors. In exchange for pleading guilty to all four counts of first-degree murder—and additional burglary charges—he will...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Bryan Kohberger, accused of murdering four University of Idaho students in November 2022, has reached a plea agreement with prosecutors. In exchange for pleading guilty to all four counts of first-degree murder—and additional burglary charges—he will receive four consecutive life sentences, with no possibility of parole and a waiver of all appellate rights. This deal effectively removes the death penalty—recently reinstated in Idaho with an optional firing-squad execution—from consideration, sparing Kohberger from capital punishment<br /><br /><br />The plea comes just weeks before his scheduled trial in August and is set to be formalized during a plea hearing on July 2, with sentencing expected in late July.   While prosecutors framed the deal as a way to ensure finality and spare the victims' families from prolonged appeals, the announcement provoked intense backlash. Notably, the Goncalves family—victims Kaylee Goncalves’ relatives—expressed fury over the timing and secrecy of the agreement, condemning it as a "stab in the back" and arguing that Kohberger would still "form relationships and engage with the world," unlike their loved one.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://nypost.com/2025/06/30/us-news/bryan-kohberger-to-plead-guilty-to-university-of-idaho-student-murders-to-avoid-death-penalty-report/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bryan Kohberger to plead guilty to University of Idaho student murders to avoid death penalty: report</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>814</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Utah’s Memorandum for Binding Tyler Robinson Over for Trial (Part 1) (8/4/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/utah-s-memorandum-for-binding-tyler-robinson-over-for-trial-part-1-8-4-26--73407480</link><description><![CDATA[Utah prosecutors argued in their bindover memorandum that the evidence presented during Tyler Robinson’s five-day preliminary hearing easily established probable cause for him to stand trial on all seven charges connected to the killing of Charlie Kirk. The state pointed to Robinson’s alleged admissions to his roommate, Lance Twiggs, and several friends, including messages in which he reportedly acknowledged shooting Kirk, described planning the attack for more than a week and discussed retrieving or concealing the rifle. Prosecutors maintained that those statements were reinforced by surveillance footage allegedly tracking Robinson onto the roof of Utah Valley University’s Losee Center, eyewitness testimony and DNA evidence connecting him to the rifle recovered near the campus. The memorandum emphasized that the state was not required to prove Robinson’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt at this stage, only that there was sufficient evidence to reasonably believe he committed the crimes.<br /><br />The state asked Judge Tony Graf Jr. to bind Robinson over for trial on aggravated murder and the remaining charges, which included felony discharge of a firearm, obstruction of justice, witness tampering and committing a violent offense in the presence of a child. Prosecutors also defended the victim-targeting enhancement, arguing that Robinson allegedly selected Kirk because of Kirk’s political and religious positions, particularly his views concerning gender and sexuality. According to the state, Robinson’s alleged statements showed both an intent to kill and a motive rooted in hostility toward Kirk’s beliefs, while his purported efforts to hide the weapon and influence Twiggs supported the additional charges. Calling the matter one of the most straightforward bindover decisions the court was likely to encounter, prosecutors concluded that the combined admissions, forensic evidence, videos and witness accounts supported sending every count to trial.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73407480</guid><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73407480/robinsonbindingmemo1.mp3" length="10594055" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ece537f7-1b2a-4ef9-b62e-352c9c089033/ece537f7-1b2a-4ef9-b62e-352c9c089033.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ece537f7-1b2a-4ef9-b62e-352c9c089033/ece537f7-1b2a-4ef9-b62e-352c9c089033.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ece537f7-1b2a-4ef9-b62e-352c9c089033/ece537f7-1b2a-4ef9-b62e-352c9c089033.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Utah prosecutors argued in their bindover memorandum that the evidence presented during Tyler Robinson’s five-day preliminary hearing easily established probable cause for him to stand trial on all seven charges connected to the killing of Charlie...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Utah prosecutors argued in their bindover memorandum that the evidence presented during Tyler Robinson’s five-day preliminary hearing easily established probable cause for him to stand trial on all seven charges connected to the killing of Charlie Kirk. The state pointed to Robinson’s alleged admissions to his roommate, Lance Twiggs, and several friends, including messages in which he reportedly acknowledged shooting Kirk, described planning the attack for more than a week and discussed retrieving or concealing the rifle. Prosecutors maintained that those statements were reinforced by surveillance footage allegedly tracking Robinson onto the roof of Utah Valley University’s Losee Center, eyewitness testimony and DNA evidence connecting him to the rifle recovered near the campus. The memorandum emphasized that the state was not required to prove Robinson’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt at this stage, only that there was sufficient evidence to reasonably believe he committed the crimes.<br /><br />The state asked Judge Tony Graf Jr. to bind Robinson over for trial on aggravated murder and the remaining charges, which included felony discharge of a firearm, obstruction of justice, witness tampering and committing a violent offense in the presence of a child. Prosecutors also defended the victim-targeting enhancement, arguing that Robinson allegedly selected Kirk because of Kirk’s political and religious positions, particularly his views concerning gender and sexuality. According to the state, Robinson’s alleged statements showed both an intent to kill and a motive rooted in hostility toward Kirk’s beliefs, while his purported efforts to hide the weapon and influence Twiggs supported the additional charges. Calling the matter one of the most straightforward bindover decisions the court was likely to encounter, prosecutors concluded that the combined admissions, forensic evidence, videos and witness accounts supported sending every count to trial.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>663</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvu</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Kathy Ruemmler And Her Epstein Related Transcript From Her Trip To Congress (Part 2) (8/4/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/kathy-ruemmler-and-her-epstein-related-transcript-from-her-trip-to-congress-part-2-8-4-26--73407482</link><description><![CDATA[Kathy Ruemmler told congressional investigators that she regretted associating with Jeffrey Epstein but maintained that she did not know he was continuing to abuse girls and young women after his 2008 conviction. The former Obama White House counsel acknowledged meeting with Epstein repeatedly, visiting his properties, exchanging numerous emails with him and accepting professional assistance and gifts, while portraying the relationship as largely intellectual and social. She said Epstein introduced her to prominent figures and discussed legal, political and financial matters with her, but denied representing him in criminal matters or helping conceal his misconduct. Ruemmler also argued that Epstein had misled her about the seriousness of his past crimes, an explanation that left investigators questioning why an experienced former federal prosecutor remained close to a registered sex offender.<br /><br />The most damaging portion of Ruemmler’s testimony concerned Virginia Giuffre. Ruemmler said some of Giuffre’s allegations “lacked inherent credibility” and was questioned about a 2015 email in which she discussed whether counterclaims could be brought against Giuffre while Giuffre was suing Ghislaine Maxwell. Ruemmler claimed she did not remember the message and suggested she may merely have been responding conversationally to Epstein rather than actively developing a legal strategy against Giuffre. She said she had no reason to doubt that Giuffre had been abused, yet stopped short of affirming that Epstein and Maxwell had victimized her. Taken together, the testimony showed Ruemmler attempting to minimize her role and distance herself from Epstein while struggling to explain why she maintained such a close relationship with him and appeared willing to question one of his most prominent accusers.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Ruemmler-Final-Transcript_Redact-7.28.26.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ruemmler-Final-Transcript_Redact-7.28.26.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73407482</guid><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73407482/ruemmler2.mp3" length="12996902" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/06472b73-423c-4a90-8b0b-2e7a77409dcb/06472b73-423c-4a90-8b0b-2e7a77409dcb.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/06472b73-423c-4a90-8b0b-2e7a77409dcb/06472b73-423c-4a90-8b0b-2e7a77409dcb.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/06472b73-423c-4a90-8b0b-2e7a77409dcb/06472b73-423c-4a90-8b0b-2e7a77409dcb.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Kathy Ruemmler told congressional investigators that she regretted associating with Jeffrey Epstein but maintained that she did not know he was continuing to abuse girls and young women after his 2008 conviction. The former Obama White House counsel...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Kathy Ruemmler told congressional investigators that she regretted associating with Jeffrey Epstein but maintained that she did not know he was continuing to abuse girls and young women after his 2008 conviction. The former Obama White House counsel acknowledged meeting with Epstein repeatedly, visiting his properties, exchanging numerous emails with him and accepting professional assistance and gifts, while portraying the relationship as largely intellectual and social. She said Epstein introduced her to prominent figures and discussed legal, political and financial matters with her, but denied representing him in criminal matters or helping conceal his misconduct. Ruemmler also argued that Epstein had misled her about the seriousness of his past crimes, an explanation that left investigators questioning why an experienced former federal prosecutor remained close to a registered sex offender.<br /><br />The most damaging portion of Ruemmler’s testimony concerned Virginia Giuffre. Ruemmler said some of Giuffre’s allegations “lacked inherent credibility” and was questioned about a 2015 email in which she discussed whether counterclaims could be brought against Giuffre while Giuffre was suing Ghislaine Maxwell. Ruemmler claimed she did not remember the message and suggested she may merely have been responding conversationally to Epstein rather than actively developing a legal strategy against Giuffre. She said she had no reason to doubt that Giuffre had been abused, yet stopped short of affirming that Epstein and Maxwell had victimized her. Taken together, the testimony showed Ruemmler attempting to minimize her role and distance herself from Epstein while struggling to explain why she maintained such a close relationship with him and appeared willing to question one of his most prominent accusers.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Ruemmler-Final-Transcript_Redact-7.28.26.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ruemmler-Final-Transcript_Redact-7.28.26.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>813</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Kathy Ruemmler And Her Epstein Related Transcript From Her Trip To Congress (Part 1) (8/4/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/kathy-ruemmler-and-her-epstein-related-transcript-from-her-trip-to-congress-part-1-8-4-26--73407479</link><description><![CDATA[Kathy Ruemmler told congressional investigators that she regretted associating with Jeffrey Epstein but maintained that she did not know he was continuing to abuse girls and young women after his 2008 conviction. The former Obama White House counsel acknowledged meeting with Epstein repeatedly, visiting his properties, exchanging numerous emails with him and accepting professional assistance and gifts, while portraying the relationship as largely intellectual and social. She said Epstein introduced her to prominent figures and discussed legal, political and financial matters with her, but denied representing him in criminal matters or helping conceal his misconduct. Ruemmler also argued that Epstein had misled her about the seriousness of his past crimes, an explanation that left investigators questioning why an experienced former federal prosecutor remained close to a registered sex offender.<br /><br />The most damaging portion of Ruemmler’s testimony concerned Virginia Giuffre. Ruemmler said some of Giuffre’s allegations “lacked inherent credibility” and was questioned about a 2015 email in which she discussed whether counterclaims could be brought against Giuffre while Giuffre was suing Ghislaine Maxwell. Ruemmler claimed she did not remember the message and suggested she may merely have been responding conversationally to Epstein rather than actively developing a legal strategy against Giuffre. She said she had no reason to doubt that Giuffre had been abused, yet stopped short of affirming that Epstein and Maxwell had victimized her. Taken together, the testimony showed Ruemmler attempting to minimize her role and distance herself from Epstein while struggling to explain why she maintained such a close relationship with him and appeared willing to question one of his most prominent accusers.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Ruemmler-Final-Transcript_Redact-7.28.26.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ruemmler-Final-Transcript_Redact-7.28.26.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73407479</guid><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 20:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73407479/ruemmler1.mp3" length="11957856" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/fc7f665c-27a6-4fe3-bbfe-0a89a031fc4f/fc7f665c-27a6-4fe3-bbfe-0a89a031fc4f.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/fc7f665c-27a6-4fe3-bbfe-0a89a031fc4f/fc7f665c-27a6-4fe3-bbfe-0a89a031fc4f.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/fc7f665c-27a6-4fe3-bbfe-0a89a031fc4f/fc7f665c-27a6-4fe3-bbfe-0a89a031fc4f.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Kathy Ruemmler told congressional investigators that she regretted associating with Jeffrey Epstein but maintained that she did not know he was continuing to abuse girls and young women after his 2008 conviction. The former Obama White House counsel...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Kathy Ruemmler told congressional investigators that she regretted associating with Jeffrey Epstein but maintained that she did not know he was continuing to abuse girls and young women after his 2008 conviction. The former Obama White House counsel acknowledged meeting with Epstein repeatedly, visiting his properties, exchanging numerous emails with him and accepting professional assistance and gifts, while portraying the relationship as largely intellectual and social. She said Epstein introduced her to prominent figures and discussed legal, political and financial matters with her, but denied representing him in criminal matters or helping conceal his misconduct. Ruemmler also argued that Epstein had misled her about the seriousness of his past crimes, an explanation that left investigators questioning why an experienced former federal prosecutor remained close to a registered sex offender.<br /><br />The most damaging portion of Ruemmler’s testimony concerned Virginia Giuffre. Ruemmler said some of Giuffre’s allegations “lacked inherent credibility” and was questioned about a 2015 email in which she discussed whether counterclaims could be brought against Giuffre while Giuffre was suing Ghislaine Maxwell. Ruemmler claimed she did not remember the message and suggested she may merely have been responding conversationally to Epstein rather than actively developing a legal strategy against Giuffre. She said she had no reason to doubt that Giuffre had been abused, yet stopped short of affirming that Epstein and Maxwell had victimized her. Taken together, the testimony showed Ruemmler attempting to minimize her role and distance herself from Epstein while struggling to explain why she maintained such a close relationship with him and appeared willing to question one of his most prominent accusers.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Ruemmler-Final-Transcript_Redact-7.28.26.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ruemmler-Final-Transcript_Redact-7.28.26.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>748</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Virginia Giuffre and the Questions Facing Western Australia Police (8/4/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/virginia-giuffre-and-the-questions-facing-western-australia-police-8-4-26--73407461</link><description><![CDATA[Western Australia’s Ombudsman has opened an independent investigation into whether police responded appropriately to Virginia Giuffre before her death in April 2025. The inquiry follows a formal request from Giuffre’s brothers, Sky Roberts and Danny Wilson, and their wives, who questioned how officers handled her domestic-violence allegations against her husband, Robert Giuffre. The family specifically wants the watchdog to examine whether her complaint was properly investigated, whether adequate risk assessments were conducted, how concerns involving firearms were addressed and whether broader systemic failures left her without sufficient protection.<br /><br />The investigation comes alongside an internal WA Police review of officers’ interactions with Giuffre. Her family said Robert Giuffre received a temporary 72-hour police order following an alleged assault in January 2025, but was not charged and later obtained a restraining order against Virginia that included their two youngest children. The family believes the combined effects of alleged abuse, separation from her children and failures by authorities contributed to her suicide. They and several domestic-violence experts have also requested a public coronial inquest, though the coroner is still awaiting the police report before deciding whether one will be held.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.watoday.com.au/politics/western-australia/wa-watchdog-probes-police-interactions-with-virginia-giuffre-20260729-p60jp4.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Virginia Giuffre: Western Australian Ombudsman probes police interactions with Epstein survivor before her death in Perth</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73407461</guid><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 18:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73407461/virginiaaustraliainvestigationintodeath.mp3" length="10044021" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a3c22857-baa1-4863-a5ff-cf777d5fd375/a3c22857-baa1-4863-a5ff-cf777d5fd375.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a3c22857-baa1-4863-a5ff-cf777d5fd375/a3c22857-baa1-4863-a5ff-cf777d5fd375.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a3c22857-baa1-4863-a5ff-cf777d5fd375/a3c22857-baa1-4863-a5ff-cf777d5fd375.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Western Australia’s Ombudsman has opened an independent investigation into whether police responded appropriately to Virginia Giuffre before her death in April 2025. The inquiry follows a formal request from Giuffre’s brothers, Sky Roberts and Danny...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Western Australia’s Ombudsman has opened an independent investigation into whether police responded appropriately to Virginia Giuffre before her death in April 2025. The inquiry follows a formal request from Giuffre’s brothers, Sky Roberts and Danny Wilson, and their wives, who questioned how officers handled her domestic-violence allegations against her husband, Robert Giuffre. The family specifically wants the watchdog to examine whether her complaint was properly investigated, whether adequate risk assessments were conducted, how concerns involving firearms were addressed and whether broader systemic failures left her without sufficient protection.<br /><br />The investigation comes alongside an internal WA Police review of officers’ interactions with Giuffre. Her family said Robert Giuffre received a temporary 72-hour police order following an alleged assault in January 2025, but was not charged and later obtained a restraining order against Virginia that included their two youngest children. The family believes the combined effects of alleged abuse, separation from her children and failures by authorities contributed to her suicide. They and several domestic-violence experts have also requested a public coronial inquest, though the coroner is still awaiting the police report before deciding whether one will be held.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.watoday.com.au/politics/western-australia/wa-watchdog-probes-police-interactions-with-virginia-giuffre-20260729-p60jp4.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Virginia Giuffre: Western Australian Ombudsman probes police interactions with Epstein survivor before her death in Perth</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>628</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Murder In Moscow:  Greg Rauch Appointed to Represent Bryan Kohberger By The State Of Idaho (8/4/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-greg-rauch-appointed-to-represent-bryan-kohberger-by-the-state-of-idaho-8-4-26--73442204</link><description><![CDATA[Bryan Kohberger was appointed a new attorney to represent him as he attempts to withdraw the guilty plea that resulted in four consecutive life sentences for the murders of University of Idaho students Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. Moscow-based attorney Greg Rauch was selected through the Idaho State Public Defender’s Alternate Counsel Division because Kohberger’s claims involve allegations against his original publicly funded defense team, creating a potential conflict of interest. Rauch said he had not yet reviewed the enormous case file or spoken extensively with Kohberger but planned to examine the police reports, court records and allegations contained in Kohberger’s handwritten petition for post-conviction relief.<br /><br />Kohberger claimed that his former attorneys pressured him into falsely confessing, misrepresented what he would experience on death row and failed to fully explain potentially favorable evidence, including hair reportedly recovered from Ethan Chapin’s hand. Those allegations sharply contradicted Kohberger’s sworn statements during his 2025 plea hearing, when he acknowledged killing the four students and repeatedly told Judge Steven Hippler that his pleas were voluntary. His waiver of a direct appeal did not prevent him from filing for post-conviction relief, but overturning the plea would require him to prove serious constitutional failures by his former lawyers. Should he succeed, the murder case could return to court for a trial, and prosecutors could once again seek the death penalty.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.foxnews.com/us/bryan-kohberger-new-attorney-appointed-post-conviction-relief-idaho-murders" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bryan Kohberger appointed new attorney after he files for post-conviction relief | Fox News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73442204</guid><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73442204/kohbergernewlawyernamed.mp3" length="10424364" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7fe433b3-fe0c-4eb0-b370-354dc869a045/7fe433b3-fe0c-4eb0-b370-354dc869a045.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7fe433b3-fe0c-4eb0-b370-354dc869a045/7fe433b3-fe0c-4eb0-b370-354dc869a045.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7fe433b3-fe0c-4eb0-b370-354dc869a045/7fe433b3-fe0c-4eb0-b370-354dc869a045.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Bryan Kohberger was appointed a new attorney to represent him as he attempts to withdraw the guilty plea that resulted in four consecutive life sentences for the murders of University of Idaho students Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Bryan Kohberger was appointed a new attorney to represent him as he attempts to withdraw the guilty plea that resulted in four consecutive life sentences for the murders of University of Idaho students Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. Moscow-based attorney Greg Rauch was selected through the Idaho State Public Defender’s Alternate Counsel Division because Kohberger’s claims involve allegations against his original publicly funded defense team, creating a potential conflict of interest. Rauch said he had not yet reviewed the enormous case file or spoken extensively with Kohberger but planned to examine the police reports, court records and allegations contained in Kohberger’s handwritten petition for post-conviction relief.<br /><br />Kohberger claimed that his former attorneys pressured him into falsely confessing, misrepresented what he would experience on death row and failed to fully explain potentially favorable evidence, including hair reportedly recovered from Ethan Chapin’s hand. Those allegations sharply contradicted Kohberger’s sworn statements during his 2025 plea hearing, when he acknowledged killing the four students and repeatedly told Judge Steven Hippler that his pleas were voluntary. His waiver of a direct appeal did not prevent him from filing for post-conviction relief, but overturning the plea would require him to prove serious constitutional failures by his former lawyers. Should he succeed, the murder case could return to court for a trial, and prosecutors could once again seek the death penalty.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.foxnews.com/us/bryan-kohberger-new-attorney-appointed-post-conviction-relief-idaho-murders" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bryan Kohberger appointed new attorney after he files for post-conviction relief | Fox News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>652</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>FirstBank Puerto Rico Moves to Dismiss Epstein Victim’s Lawsuit (8/4/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/firstbank-puerto-rico-moves-to-dismiss-epstein-victim-s-lawsuit-8-4-26--73407460</link><description><![CDATA[FirstBank Puerto Rico has asked a federal judge in New York to dismiss a lawsuit accusing the bank of participating in and profiting from Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking operation. The anonymous plaintiff, identified as Jane Doe, alleged that FirstBank provided Epstein and his associates with banking services for more than two decades, gaining access to financial information that should have exposed his criminal network. The complaint cited more than 4,725 wire transfers involving approximately $1.08 billion between Epstein and several associates, arguing that the bank ignored warning signs while benefiting financially from the relationship.<br /><br />FirstBank denied having any knowledge of Epstein’s trafficking activities and argued that the lawsuit failed to identify evidence showing that its employees knowingly assisted or participated in his crimes. The bank characterized its involvement as the provision of routine financial services and said the complaint relied heavily on allegations made against other financial institutions rather than specific misconduct by FirstBank. It also maintained that it cooperated with law enforcement by filing a suspicious activity report and responding to subpoenas, arguing that the case improperly judged its conduct with the benefit of hindsight and should be dismissed with prejudice.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73407460</guid><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 14:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73407460/survivorsuitagainstfirsbankpuertorico.mp3" length="13481735" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/af6cc5c5-ae44-4d7e-b26f-2accf3fe9a0f/af6cc5c5-ae44-4d7e-b26f-2accf3fe9a0f.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/af6cc5c5-ae44-4d7e-b26f-2accf3fe9a0f/af6cc5c5-ae44-4d7e-b26f-2accf3fe9a0f.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/af6cc5c5-ae44-4d7e-b26f-2accf3fe9a0f/af6cc5c5-ae44-4d7e-b26f-2accf3fe9a0f.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>FirstBank Puerto Rico has asked a federal judge in New York to dismiss a lawsuit accusing the bank of participating in and profiting from Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking operation. The anonymous plaintiff, identified as Jane Doe, alleged that...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[FirstBank Puerto Rico has asked a federal judge in New York to dismiss a lawsuit accusing the bank of participating in and profiting from Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking operation. The anonymous plaintiff, identified as Jane Doe, alleged that FirstBank provided Epstein and his associates with banking services for more than two decades, gaining access to financial information that should have exposed his criminal network. The complaint cited more than 4,725 wire transfers involving approximately $1.08 billion between Epstein and several associates, arguing that the bank ignored warning signs while benefiting financially from the relationship.<br /><br />FirstBank denied having any knowledge of Epstein’s trafficking activities and argued that the lawsuit failed to identify evidence showing that its employees knowingly assisted or participated in his crimes. The bank characterized its involvement as the provision of routine financial services and said the complaint relied heavily on allegations made against other financial institutions rather than specific misconduct by FirstBank. It also maintained that it cooperated with law enforcement by filing a suspicious activity report and responding to subpoenas, arguing that the case improperly judged its conduct with the benefit of hindsight and should be dismissed with prejudice.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>843</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Epstein Flag List and the Rush to Close the Case (8/3/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-epstein-flag-list-and-the-rush-to-close-the-case-8-3-26--73359859</link><description><![CDATA[Newly released FBI records showed that, days after a July 2025 White House Situation Room meeting about the escalating Epstein controversy, FBI Director Kash Patel asked for information about sensitive material uncovered during the bureau’s review. An FBI official responded with spreadsheets labeled “Flagged Items Lists,” which reportedly included references to public figures, potentially classified information and possible child sexual abuse material. The documents indicated that FBI reviewers had been instructed by the Justice Department to flag such material for discussion with DOJ attorneys while records were being processed and redacted. Todd Blanche, then serving as deputy attorney general, was identified as the senior Justice Department official overseeing the effort.<br /><br />The internal communications appeared to conflict with the Justice Department and FBI’s public statement issued two weeks earlier, which said their exhaustive review had uncovered no evidence warranting investigations of additional uncharged people. The flagged material had reportedly been delivered to the Justice Department months before that declaration, raising questions about how quickly officials decided to close the matter and whether potentially significant leads received adequate scrutiny. The existence of prominent names in investigative records did not establish criminal wrongdoing, and flagged material could include unverified tips or incidental references, but the timing and apparent disparity between the private review and the government’s public conclusions fueled suspicions that the department was rushing to shut down further examination of Epstein’s powerful associates<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.rawstory.com/raw-investigates/todd-blanche/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Scrambling DOJ rushed to shut Epstein case as 'flag list' surfaced big names: new docs - Raw Story</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73359859</guid><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 12:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73359859/dojepsteinflaglist.mp3" length="13184566" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ea1bccd3-371b-409a-824f-8af82ec3d18b/ea1bccd3-371b-409a-824f-8af82ec3d18b.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ea1bccd3-371b-409a-824f-8af82ec3d18b/ea1bccd3-371b-409a-824f-8af82ec3d18b.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ea1bccd3-371b-409a-824f-8af82ec3d18b/ea1bccd3-371b-409a-824f-8af82ec3d18b.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Newly released FBI records showed that, days after a July 2025 White House Situation Room meeting about the escalating Epstein controversy, FBI Director Kash Patel asked for information about sensitive material uncovered during the bureau’s review. An...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Newly released FBI records showed that, days after a July 2025 White House Situation Room meeting about the escalating Epstein controversy, FBI Director Kash Patel asked for information about sensitive material uncovered during the bureau’s review. An FBI official responded with spreadsheets labeled “Flagged Items Lists,” which reportedly included references to public figures, potentially classified information and possible child sexual abuse material. The documents indicated that FBI reviewers had been instructed by the Justice Department to flag such material for discussion with DOJ attorneys while records were being processed and redacted. Todd Blanche, then serving as deputy attorney general, was identified as the senior Justice Department official overseeing the effort.<br /><br />The internal communications appeared to conflict with the Justice Department and FBI’s public statement issued two weeks earlier, which said their exhaustive review had uncovered no evidence warranting investigations of additional uncharged people. The flagged material had reportedly been delivered to the Justice Department months before that declaration, raising questions about how quickly officials decided to close the matter and whether potentially significant leads received adequate scrutiny. The existence of prominent names in investigative records did not establish criminal wrongdoing, and flagged material could include unverified tips or incidental references, but the timing and apparent disparity between the private review and the government’s public conclusions fueled suspicions that the department was rushing to shut down further examination of Epstein’s powerful associates<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.rawstory.com/raw-investigates/todd-blanche/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Scrambling DOJ rushed to shut Epstein case as 'flag list' surfaced big names: new docs - Raw Story</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>825</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Was Bryan Kohberger Stalking Any Of His Victims?  (8/4/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-was-bryan-kohberger-stalking-any-of-his-victims-8-4-26--73397112</link><description><![CDATA[Rumors had circulated almost immediately after Bryan Kohberger’s arrest that he had stalked one or more of the victims before the murders. Much of that speculation centered on cellphone records showing that his phone had connected to towers serving the King Road area on several occasions in the months before the killings. Reports also claimed that he had followed Kaylee Goncalves and Madison Mogen on Instagram, sent messages to one of the women, watched them at work or repeatedly drove past their home. Those allegations helped create a widely repeated narrative that Kohberger had selected a specific victim and had conducted surveillance before entering the house.<br /><br />Investigators, however, had not substantiated the broad stalking narrative. They reportedly found no verified messages, photographs or social-media connections between Kohberger and any of the four victims, and the cellphone data did not establish what he had been doing during his earlier trips through the Moscow area. The prosecution also never formally alleged that he had stalked the victims, and no clear prior relationship was established. Although his movements and repeated presence near Moscow remained suspicious in the larger context of the case, the specific claims that he had followed, contacted or obsessively monitored one of the victims had remained largely rumor rather than proven fact.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73397112</guid><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 10:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73397112/megakohbergerstalkingrumors.mp3" length="36882852" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/321f1bce-eae7-406b-b999-280b0f09945d/321f1bce-eae7-406b-b999-280b0f09945d.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/321f1bce-eae7-406b-b999-280b0f09945d/321f1bce-eae7-406b-b999-280b0f09945d.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/321f1bce-eae7-406b-b999-280b0f09945d/321f1bce-eae7-406b-b999-280b0f09945d.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Rumors had circulated almost immediately after Bryan Kohberger’s arrest that he had stalked one or more of the victims before the murders. Much of that speculation centered on cellphone records showing that his phone had connected to towers serving...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Rumors had circulated almost immediately after Bryan Kohberger’s arrest that he had stalked one or more of the victims before the murders. Much of that speculation centered on cellphone records showing that his phone had connected to towers serving the King Road area on several occasions in the months before the killings. Reports also claimed that he had followed Kaylee Goncalves and Madison Mogen on Instagram, sent messages to one of the women, watched them at work or repeatedly drove past their home. Those allegations helped create a widely repeated narrative that Kohberger had selected a specific victim and had conducted surveillance before entering the house.<br /><br />Investigators, however, had not substantiated the broad stalking narrative. They reportedly found no verified messages, photographs or social-media connections between Kohberger and any of the four victims, and the cellphone data did not establish what he had been doing during his earlier trips through the Moscow area. The prosecution also never formally alleged that he had stalked the victims, and no clear prior relationship was established. Although his movements and repeated presence near Moscow remained suspicious in the larger context of the case, the specific claims that he had followed, contacted or obsessively monitored one of the victims had remained largely rumor rather than proven fact.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2306</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Bryan Kohberger And The Instagram Rumors (8/4/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-the-instagram-rumors-8-4-26--73397110</link><description><![CDATA[<br />Rumors circulated after Bryan Kohberger’s arrest that he had followed victims Kaylee Goncalves and Madison Mogen on Instagram before the murders. Kaylee’s parents said they had located an account they believed belonged to Kohberger and claimed it had followed both women and repeatedly liked photographs on Mogen’s page. Other reports alleged that Kohberger had sent direct messages to one of the victims, but those claims relied on anonymous sourcing, and CBS’s 48 Hours was unable to independently authenticate the Instagram account the family had identified.<br /><br />The allegations were never substantiated by the official investigation. After examining Kohberger’s phones, online accounts and other digital records, investigators said they had found no photographs, messages or verified social-media connections linking him to any of the four victims. The Instagram narrative therefore remained an unconfirmed rumor rather than established evidence, illustrating how speculation about Kohberger supposedly stalking the victims online had spread faster than the facts available in the case.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73397110</guid><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73397110/megakohbergerinstagram.mp3" length="26154257" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/53940259-4436-4168-878b-dce79fa14ed0/53940259-4436-4168-878b-dce79fa14ed0.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/53940259-4436-4168-878b-dce79fa14ed0/53940259-4436-4168-878b-dce79fa14ed0.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/53940259-4436-4168-878b-dce79fa14ed0/53940259-4436-4168-878b-dce79fa14ed0.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Rumors circulated after Bryan Kohberger’s arrest that he had followed victims Kaylee Goncalves and Madison Mogen on Instagram before the murders. Kaylee’s parents said they had located an account they believed belonged to Kohberger and claimed it had...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br />Rumors circulated after Bryan Kohberger’s arrest that he had followed victims Kaylee Goncalves and Madison Mogen on Instagram before the murders. Kaylee’s parents said they had located an account they believed belonged to Kohberger and claimed it had followed both women and repeatedly liked photographs on Mogen’s page. Other reports alleged that Kohberger had sent direct messages to one of the victims, but those claims relied on anonymous sourcing, and CBS’s 48 Hours was unable to independently authenticate the Instagram account the family had identified.<br /><br />The allegations were never substantiated by the official investigation. After examining Kohberger’s phones, online accounts and other digital records, investigators said they had found no photographs, messages or verified social-media connections linking him to any of the four victims. The Instagram narrative therefore remained an unconfirmed rumor rather than established evidence, illustrating how speculation about Kohberger supposedly stalking the victims online had spread faster than the facts available in the case.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1635</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Bryan Kohberger And The Trash Pull (8/3/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-the-trash-pull-8-3-26--73397111</link><description><![CDATA[After investigators identified Bryan Kohberger as a suspect, law enforcement began surveilling his parents’ home in Pennsylvania and arranged a nighttime “trash pull” to obtain family DNA. Agents retrieved garbage that had been placed at the curb for collection and sent it to the Idaho State Police laboratory. A Q-tip recovered from the trash contained DNA that was identified as belonging to the biological father of the man whose DNA had been found on the knife sheath beside Madison Mogen’s body. That familial match strengthened investigators’ case and helped provide the basis for Kohberger’s arrest on December 30, 2022.<br /><br />During the surveillance, Kohberger was reportedly seen wearing surgical-style rubber gloves on multiple occasions, meticulously cleaning his white Hyundai Elantra and leaving the house at approximately 4 a.m. to place bags of trash in a neighbor’s garbage bin. Investigators later recovered those bags as well. When police entered the home to arrest him, Kohberger was allegedly awake in the kitchen wearing latex gloves and separating his personal garbage into individual plastic bags. The behavior did not independently prove his guilt, but prosecutors presented it as evidence that he had been taking unusual precautions to prevent investigators from obtaining his DNA or potentially incriminating material.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73397111</guid><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73397111/megakohbergertrashpullneighborstrash.mp3" length="25284066" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c15105d6-f263-47fe-88f6-26625516aacd/c15105d6-f263-47fe-88f6-26625516aacd.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c15105d6-f263-47fe-88f6-26625516aacd/c15105d6-f263-47fe-88f6-26625516aacd.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c15105d6-f263-47fe-88f6-26625516aacd/c15105d6-f263-47fe-88f6-26625516aacd.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>After investigators identified Bryan Kohberger as a suspect, law enforcement began surveilling his parents’ home in Pennsylvania and arranged a nighttime “trash pull” to obtain family DNA. Agents retrieved garbage that had been placed at the curb for...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[After investigators identified Bryan Kohberger as a suspect, law enforcement began surveilling his parents’ home in Pennsylvania and arranged a nighttime “trash pull” to obtain family DNA. Agents retrieved garbage that had been placed at the curb for collection and sent it to the Idaho State Police laboratory. A Q-tip recovered from the trash contained DNA that was identified as belonging to the biological father of the man whose DNA had been found on the knife sheath beside Madison Mogen’s body. That familial match strengthened investigators’ case and helped provide the basis for Kohberger’s arrest on December 30, 2022.<br /><br />During the surveillance, Kohberger was reportedly seen wearing surgical-style rubber gloves on multiple occasions, meticulously cleaning his white Hyundai Elantra and leaving the house at approximately 4 a.m. to place bags of trash in a neighbor’s garbage bin. Investigators later recovered those bags as well. When police entered the home to arrest him, Kohberger was allegedly awake in the kitchen wearing latex gloves and separating his personal garbage into individual plastic bags. The behavior did not independently prove his guilt, but prosecutors presented it as evidence that he had been taking unusual precautions to prevent investigators from obtaining his DNA or potentially incriminating material.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1581</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Murder In Moscow:  Bryan Kohberger And The Allegations That The FBI Harassed His Witness</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-bryan-kohberger-and-the-allegations-that-the-fbi-harassed-his-witness--73396201</link><description><![CDATA[Bryan Kohberger’s defense attorney, Anne Taylor, accused the FBI of interfering with defense witness Gabriella Vargas, a genetic-genealogy expert who had questioned aspects of the investigative genetic genealogy used to identify Kohberger. Taylor told the court that two FBI agents had visited Vargas at her home and questioned her about her testimony after she appeared for the defense. Taylor argued that the encounter had intimidated the witness and potentially undermined Kohberger’s due-process rights by placing federal pressure on someone assisting his legal team.<br /><br /><br />Latah County prosecutor Bill Thompson disputed the suggestion that the FBI had improperly targeted Vargas. He said investigators had contacted her because questions had emerged about whether her testimony accurately reflected her expertise and opinions, characterizing the interview as a legitimate investigative step rather than witness tampering. The dispute added another fight over the FBI’s role in the case, particularly its use of genetic genealogy to connect DNA from the knife sheath found at the crime scene to Kohberger’s family.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.newsweek.com/bryan-kohberger-update-fbi-accused-interfering-witness-case-1824459" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bryan Kohberger Update: FBI Accused of Interfering With Witness on Case (newsweek.com)</a><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73396201</guid><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73396201/kohbergeraccusewithevidence.mp3" length="11190901" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/16e1f483-6401-49c3-895b-da06ed43aea7/16e1f483-6401-49c3-895b-da06ed43aea7.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/16e1f483-6401-49c3-895b-da06ed43aea7/16e1f483-6401-49c3-895b-da06ed43aea7.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/16e1f483-6401-49c3-895b-da06ed43aea7/16e1f483-6401-49c3-895b-da06ed43aea7.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Bryan Kohberger’s defense attorney, Anne Taylor, accused the FBI of interfering with defense witness Gabriella Vargas, a genetic-genealogy expert who had questioned aspects of the investigative genetic genealogy used to identify Kohberger. Taylor told...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Bryan Kohberger’s defense attorney, Anne Taylor, accused the FBI of interfering with defense witness Gabriella Vargas, a genetic-genealogy expert who had questioned aspects of the investigative genetic genealogy used to identify Kohberger. Taylor told the court that two FBI agents had visited Vargas at her home and questioned her about her testimony after she appeared for the defense. Taylor argued that the encounter had intimidated the witness and potentially undermined Kohberger’s due-process rights by placing federal pressure on someone assisting his legal team.<br /><br /><br />Latah County prosecutor Bill Thompson disputed the suggestion that the FBI had improperly targeted Vargas. He said investigators had contacted her because questions had emerged about whether her testimony accurately reflected her expertise and opinions, characterizing the interview as a legitimate investigative step rather than witness tampering. The dispute added another fight over the FBI’s role in the case, particularly its use of genetic genealogy to connect DNA from the knife sheath found at the crime scene to Kohberger’s family.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.newsweek.com/bryan-kohberger-update-fbi-accused-interfering-witness-case-1824459" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bryan Kohberger Update: FBI Accused of Interfering With Witness on Case (newsweek.com)</a><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>700</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Murder In Moscow:  The IGG Closed Hearing Transcripts (Part 14)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-the-igg-closed-hearing-transcripts-part-14--73220537</link><description><![CDATA[On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), which they argued violated Kohberger's Fourth Amendment rights. Detective Brett Payne testified that the IGG lead was treated as a tip, with further independent investigation conducted to substantiate its validity. Defense expert Dr. Leah Larkin suggested potential violations of FBI policy and genealogy database terms of service during the IGG process. However, Judge Hippler expressed skepticism regarding the defense's claims, noting the lack of a reasonable expectation of privacy for DNA left at a crime scene.<br /><br />Following the hearing, Judge Hippler ordered the release of a redacted transcript, balancing public interest with privacy concerns. Redactions included the names of surviving roommates and distant relatives identified through IGG. The unsealed portions provide insight into the investigative methods used and the defense's challenges to the evidence's admissibility. This development underscores the ongoing legal debates surrounding the use of IGG in criminal investigations and its implications for privacy and constitutional rights.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/022125-Transcript-Redacted-hearing-held-Jan23-2025.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">KB-25-01-23-Hearing-Redacted.ecl</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73220537</guid><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73220537/iggtranscripts14.mp3" length="13183312" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4931d7ec-0b17-403b-abc4-e52a06105e43/4931d7ec-0b17-403b-abc4-e52a06105e43.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4931d7ec-0b17-403b-abc4-e52a06105e43/4931d7ec-0b17-403b-abc4-e52a06105e43.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4931d7ec-0b17-403b-abc4-e52a06105e43/4931d7ec-0b17-403b-abc4-e52a06105e43.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG),...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), which they argued violated Kohberger's Fourth Amendment rights. Detective Brett Payne testified that the IGG lead was treated as a tip, with further independent investigation conducted to substantiate its validity. Defense expert Dr. Leah Larkin suggested potential violations of FBI policy and genealogy database terms of service during the IGG process. However, Judge Hippler expressed skepticism regarding the defense's claims, noting the lack of a reasonable expectation of privacy for DNA left at a crime scene.<br /><br />Following the hearing, Judge Hippler ordered the release of a redacted transcript, balancing public interest with privacy concerns. Redactions included the names of surviving roommates and distant relatives identified through IGG. The unsealed portions provide insight into the investigative methods used and the defense's challenges to the evidence's admissibility. This development underscores the ongoing legal debates surrounding the use of IGG in criminal investigations and its implications for privacy and constitutional rights.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/022125-Transcript-Redacted-hearing-held-Jan23-2025.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">KB-25-01-23-Hearing-Redacted.ecl</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>824</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Ted Waitt And The Transcript From His Epstein Related Trip To Congress (Part 11) (8/3/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/ted-waitt-and-the-transcript-from-his-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-11-8-3-26--73391481</link><description><![CDATA[Ted Waitt told the House Oversight Committee that he met Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein at a Hong Kong dinner in November 2003 and began dating Maxwell the following year, remaining in a relationship with her until September 2010. Waitt portrayed his own contact with Epstein as extremely limited, saying he had only a brief introduction at the dinner, one arranged meeting at Maxwell’s New York residence and two later chance encounters. He said he never communicated with Epstein by phone or email and had no business or financial relationship with him. Waitt testified that Maxwell described Epstein positively as a brilliant investor and money manager and told him that, after their romantic relationship ended, she continued working as an estate manager overseeing his properties and staff.<br /><br />Waitt said he wanted Maxwell to stop working for Epstein because Epstein was her former boyfriend, but claimed he had no knowledge at the time of their criminal conduct and never witnessed abuse, coercion or trafficking. He repeatedly said he could not confirm how much work Maxwell continued doing for Epstein while they dated, despite their seven-year relationship, and he denied knowing whether Epstein manipulated or abused her. Waitt also acknowledged that Maxwell had been around his four children, three of whom were girls, and said that had he known then what he knows now, he never would have befriended her or allowed her near them. His testimony largely presented him as someone who was intimately involved with Maxwell for years while remaining unaware of the reality of her relationship with Epstein and the crimes for which she was later convicted.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2026/05/Waitt-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GO120551</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73391481</guid><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73391481/waitt11.mp3" length="17729872" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a45ff185-2b9e-4d33-b18f-27b8a14b8fb6/a45ff185-2b9e-4d33-b18f-27b8a14b8fb6.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a45ff185-2b9e-4d33-b18f-27b8a14b8fb6/a45ff185-2b9e-4d33-b18f-27b8a14b8fb6.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a45ff185-2b9e-4d33-b18f-27b8a14b8fb6/a45ff185-2b9e-4d33-b18f-27b8a14b8fb6.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Ted Waitt told the House Oversight Committee that he met Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein at a Hong Kong dinner in November 2003 and began dating Maxwell the following year, remaining in a relationship with her until September 2010. Waitt...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Ted Waitt told the House Oversight Committee that he met Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein at a Hong Kong dinner in November 2003 and began dating Maxwell the following year, remaining in a relationship with her until September 2010. Waitt portrayed his own contact with Epstein as extremely limited, saying he had only a brief introduction at the dinner, one arranged meeting at Maxwell’s New York residence and two later chance encounters. He said he never communicated with Epstein by phone or email and had no business or financial relationship with him. Waitt testified that Maxwell described Epstein positively as a brilliant investor and money manager and told him that, after their romantic relationship ended, she continued working as an estate manager overseeing his properties and staff.<br /><br />Waitt said he wanted Maxwell to stop working for Epstein because Epstein was her former boyfriend, but claimed he had no knowledge at the time of their criminal conduct and never witnessed abuse, coercion or trafficking. He repeatedly said he could not confirm how much work Maxwell continued doing for Epstein while they dated, despite their seven-year relationship, and he denied knowing whether Epstein manipulated or abused her. Waitt also acknowledged that Maxwell had been around his four children, three of whom were girls, and said that had he known then what he knows now, he never would have befriended her or allowed her near them. His testimony largely presented him as someone who was intimately involved with Maxwell for years while remaining unaware of the reality of her relationship with Epstein and the crimes for which she was later convicted.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2026/05/Waitt-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GO120551</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1109</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Murder In Moscow:  Bryan Kohberger’s Defense Expert Makes a Stunning Reversal (8/3/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-bryan-kohberger-s-defense-expert-makes-a-stunning-reversal-8-3-26--73391819</link><description><![CDATA[Digital-forensics analyst Sy Ray, who was hired by Bryan Kohberger’s defense team before Kohberger pleaded guilty to murdering four University of Idaho students, now says Kohberger should receive a new trial and face the death penalty. Ray claims investigators failed to properly analyze cellphone and geolocation evidence that could show Kohberger had been near, or possibly inside, the King Road residence before the killings. He also believes Madison Mogen was the primary target, pointing to what he described as repeated geographic “collisions” between her phone and Kohberger’s device. Ray said he is certain Kohberger committed the murders and warned that he could kill again if he were ever released.<br /><br />Ray’s new claims, however, sharply contradict the report he prepared for the defense in January 2025. In that filing, he concluded that the available geolocation evidence did not connect Kohberger to the victims or their residence and said he found no evidence of stalking or surveillance at the King Road house. Other experts have questioned why Ray is now presenting conclusions that differ so dramatically from his original analysis, while prosecutors never publicly alleged that Kohberger had been inside the home before the murders or identified a specific victim as the target. Kohberger, who is serving four consecutive life sentences, recently sought to withdraw his guilty plea by arguing that he received ineffective assistance from his defense lawyers.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.foxnews.com/us/bryan-kohberger-former-defense-expert-calls-death-penalty-investigators-missed-key-evidence" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bryan Kohberger deserves new trial and death penalty, expert says | Fox News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73391819</guid><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73391819/syraykohbergerguilty.mp3" length="15227551" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a2b32af2-8575-46aa-ab88-52f6b7a43336/a2b32af2-8575-46aa-ab88-52f6b7a43336.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a2b32af2-8575-46aa-ab88-52f6b7a43336/a2b32af2-8575-46aa-ab88-52f6b7a43336.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a2b32af2-8575-46aa-ab88-52f6b7a43336/a2b32af2-8575-46aa-ab88-52f6b7a43336.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Digital-forensics analyst Sy Ray, who was hired by Bryan Kohberger’s defense team before Kohberger pleaded guilty to murdering four University of Idaho students, now says Kohberger should receive a new trial and face the death penalty. Ray claims...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Digital-forensics analyst Sy Ray, who was hired by Bryan Kohberger’s defense team before Kohberger pleaded guilty to murdering four University of Idaho students, now says Kohberger should receive a new trial and face the death penalty. Ray claims investigators failed to properly analyze cellphone and geolocation evidence that could show Kohberger had been near, or possibly inside, the King Road residence before the killings. He also believes Madison Mogen was the primary target, pointing to what he described as repeated geographic “collisions” between her phone and Kohberger’s device. Ray said he is certain Kohberger committed the murders and warned that he could kill again if he were ever released.<br /><br />Ray’s new claims, however, sharply contradict the report he prepared for the defense in January 2025. In that filing, he concluded that the available geolocation evidence did not connect Kohberger to the victims or their residence and said he found no evidence of stalking or surveillance at the King Road house. Other experts have questioned why Ray is now presenting conclusions that differ so dramatically from his original analysis, while prosecutors never publicly alleged that Kohberger had been inside the home before the murders or identified a specific victim as the target. Kohberger, who is serving four consecutive life sentences, recently sought to withdraw his guilty plea by arguing that he received ineffective assistance from his defense lawyers.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.foxnews.com/us/bryan-kohberger-former-defense-expert-calls-death-penalty-investigators-missed-key-evidence" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bryan Kohberger deserves new trial and death penalty, expert says | Fox News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>952</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Ted Waitt And The Transcript From His Epstein Related Trip To Congress (Part 10) (8/3/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/ted-waitt-and-the-transcript-from-his-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-10-8-3-26--73391480</link><description><![CDATA[Ted Waitt told the House Oversight Committee that he met Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein at a Hong Kong dinner in November 2003 and began dating Maxwell the following year, remaining in a relationship with her until September 2010. Waitt portrayed his own contact with Epstein as extremely limited, saying he had only a brief introduction at the dinner, one arranged meeting at Maxwell’s New York residence and two later chance encounters. He said he never communicated with Epstein by phone or email and had no business or financial relationship with him. Waitt testified that Maxwell described Epstein positively as a brilliant investor and money manager and told him that, after their romantic relationship ended, she continued working as an estate manager overseeing his properties and staff.<br /><br />Waitt said he wanted Maxwell to stop working for Epstein because Epstein was her former boyfriend, but claimed he had no knowledge at the time of their criminal conduct and never witnessed abuse, coercion or trafficking. He repeatedly said he could not confirm how much work Maxwell continued doing for Epstein while they dated, despite their seven-year relationship, and he denied knowing whether Epstein manipulated or abused her. Waitt also acknowledged that Maxwell had been around his four children, three of whom were girls, and said that had he known then what he knows now, he never would have befriended her or allowed her near them. His testimony largely presented him as someone who was intimately involved with Maxwell for years while remaining unaware of the reality of her relationship with Epstein and the crimes for which she was later convicted.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2026/05/Waitt-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GO120551</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73391480</guid><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73391480/waitt10.mp3" length="11355159" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5275457b-f7ac-46be-81bc-259ab596f290/5275457b-f7ac-46be-81bc-259ab596f290.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5275457b-f7ac-46be-81bc-259ab596f290/5275457b-f7ac-46be-81bc-259ab596f290.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5275457b-f7ac-46be-81bc-259ab596f290/5275457b-f7ac-46be-81bc-259ab596f290.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Ted Waitt told the House Oversight Committee that he met Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein at a Hong Kong dinner in November 2003 and began dating Maxwell the following year, remaining in a relationship with her until September 2010. Waitt...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Ted Waitt told the House Oversight Committee that he met Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein at a Hong Kong dinner in November 2003 and began dating Maxwell the following year, remaining in a relationship with her until September 2010. Waitt portrayed his own contact with Epstein as extremely limited, saying he had only a brief introduction at the dinner, one arranged meeting at Maxwell’s New York residence and two later chance encounters. He said he never communicated with Epstein by phone or email and had no business or financial relationship with him. Waitt testified that Maxwell described Epstein positively as a brilliant investor and money manager and told him that, after their romantic relationship ended, she continued working as an estate manager overseeing his properties and staff.<br /><br />Waitt said he wanted Maxwell to stop working for Epstein because Epstein was her former boyfriend, but claimed he had no knowledge at the time of their criminal conduct and never witnessed abuse, coercion or trafficking. He repeatedly said he could not confirm how much work Maxwell continued doing for Epstein while they dated, despite their seven-year relationship, and he denied knowing whether Epstein manipulated or abused her. Waitt also acknowledged that Maxwell had been around his four children, three of whom were girls, and said that had he known then what he knows now, he never would have befriended her or allowed her near them. His testimony largely presented him as someone who was intimately involved with Maxwell for years while remaining unaware of the reality of her relationship with Epstein and the crimes for which she was later convicted.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2026/05/Waitt-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GO120551</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>710</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Ted Waitt And The Transcript From His Epstein Related Trip To Congress (Part 9) (8/3/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/ted-waitt-and-the-transcript-from-his-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-9-8-3-26--73391479</link><description><![CDATA[Ted Waitt told the House Oversight Committee that he met Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein at a Hong Kong dinner in November 2003 and began dating Maxwell the following year, remaining in a relationship with her until September 2010. Waitt portrayed his own contact with Epstein as extremely limited, saying he had only a brief introduction at the dinner, one arranged meeting at Maxwell’s New York residence and two later chance encounters. He said he never communicated with Epstein by phone or email and had no business or financial relationship with him. Waitt testified that Maxwell described Epstein positively as a brilliant investor and money manager and told him that, after their romantic relationship ended, she continued working as an estate manager overseeing his properties and staff.<br /><br />Waitt said he wanted Maxwell to stop working for Epstein because Epstein was her former boyfriend, but claimed he had no knowledge at the time of their criminal conduct and never witnessed abuse, coercion or trafficking. He repeatedly said he could not confirm how much work Maxwell continued doing for Epstein while they dated, despite their seven-year relationship, and he denied knowing whether Epstein manipulated or abused her. Waitt also acknowledged that Maxwell had been around his four children, three of whom were girls, and said that had he known then what he knows now, he never would have befriended her or allowed her near them. His testimony largely presented him as someone who was intimately involved with Maxwell for years while remaining unaware of the reality of her relationship with Epstein and the crimes for which she was later convicted.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2026/05/Waitt-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GO120551</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73391479</guid><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 18:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73391479/waitt9.mp3" length="11753474" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/03793ec5-7c63-4cbc-941f-790a49e8bf2b/03793ec5-7c63-4cbc-941f-790a49e8bf2b.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/03793ec5-7c63-4cbc-941f-790a49e8bf2b/03793ec5-7c63-4cbc-941f-790a49e8bf2b.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/03793ec5-7c63-4cbc-941f-790a49e8bf2b/03793ec5-7c63-4cbc-941f-790a49e8bf2b.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Ted Waitt told the House Oversight Committee that he met Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein at a Hong Kong dinner in November 2003 and began dating Maxwell the following year, remaining in a relationship with her until September 2010. Waitt...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Ted Waitt told the House Oversight Committee that he met Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein at a Hong Kong dinner in November 2003 and began dating Maxwell the following year, remaining in a relationship with her until September 2010. Waitt portrayed his own contact with Epstein as extremely limited, saying he had only a brief introduction at the dinner, one arranged meeting at Maxwell’s New York residence and two later chance encounters. He said he never communicated with Epstein by phone or email and had no business or financial relationship with him. Waitt testified that Maxwell described Epstein positively as a brilliant investor and money manager and told him that, after their romantic relationship ended, she continued working as an estate manager overseeing his properties and staff.<br /><br />Waitt said he wanted Maxwell to stop working for Epstein because Epstein was her former boyfriend, but claimed he had no knowledge at the time of their criminal conduct and never witnessed abuse, coercion or trafficking. He repeatedly said he could not confirm how much work Maxwell continued doing for Epstein while they dated, despite their seven-year relationship, and he denied knowing whether Epstein manipulated or abused her. Waitt also acknowledged that Maxwell had been around his four children, three of whom were girls, and said that had he known then what he knows now, he never would have befriended her or allowed her near them. His testimony largely presented him as someone who was intimately involved with Maxwell for years while remaining unaware of the reality of her relationship with Epstein and the crimes for which she was later convicted.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2026/05/Waitt-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GO120551</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>735</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Two Survivor Lawsuits Against Wexner Become One Major Case (8/3/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/two-survivor-lawsuits-against-wexner-become-one-major-case-8-3-26--73359858</link><description><![CDATA[A New York judge ordered two lawsuits brought by Jeffrey Epstein survivors against billionaire Leslie Wexner to be combined into a single case because they contain substantially overlapping allegations, defendants and legal questions. The consolidated litigation accuses Wexner, the Wexner Foundation and a corporation connected to Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse of helping provide the money, property and institutional credibility that allowed Epstein’s abuse operation to flourish. The survivors allege that Wexner gave Epstein extraordinary financial authority, continued supporting him despite warning signs and enabled Epstein to use his wealth and connections to recruit, transport and abuse girls and young women. The claims were brought under New York City’s Gender-Motivated Violence Protection Act, which permits survivors to sue not only alleged perpetrators but also people or institutions accused of facilitating the abuse.<br /><br />Combining the lawsuits does not decide whether Wexner is liable, but it streamlines the litigation by placing the survivors’ claims before one judge and allowing evidence, witness testimony and pretrial disputes to be handled together. Wexner has denied knowing about Epstein’s crimes and maintains that he was deceived and financially exploited by Epstein, arguing that the complaints lack a factual basis and will be vigorously contested. The survivors, however, contend that Epstein could not have built his fortune, reputation and trafficking infrastructure without the access and legitimacy Wexner provided. The consolidated case will therefore focus heavily on what Wexner knew, when he knew it and whether his financial and professional relationship with Epstein legally amounted to enabling the abuse.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.wtrf.com/news/epstein-survivors-lawsuits-against-les-wexner-combined-into-one-case/?nxsparam=1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein survivors’ lawsuits against Les Wexner combined into one case | WTRF</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73359858</guid><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73359858/survivorwexnersuitcombined.mp3" length="10338264" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8a050fc5-03a4-4d03-bedc-90b8c4f66b0c/8a050fc5-03a4-4d03-bedc-90b8c4f66b0c.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8a050fc5-03a4-4d03-bedc-90b8c4f66b0c/8a050fc5-03a4-4d03-bedc-90b8c4f66b0c.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8a050fc5-03a4-4d03-bedc-90b8c4f66b0c/8a050fc5-03a4-4d03-bedc-90b8c4f66b0c.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A New York judge ordered two lawsuits brought by Jeffrey Epstein survivors against billionaire Leslie Wexner to be combined into a single case because they contain substantially overlapping allegations, defendants and legal questions. The consolidated...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A New York judge ordered two lawsuits brought by Jeffrey Epstein survivors against billionaire Leslie Wexner to be combined into a single case because they contain substantially overlapping allegations, defendants and legal questions. The consolidated litigation accuses Wexner, the Wexner Foundation and a corporation connected to Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse of helping provide the money, property and institutional credibility that allowed Epstein’s abuse operation to flourish. The survivors allege that Wexner gave Epstein extraordinary financial authority, continued supporting him despite warning signs and enabled Epstein to use his wealth and connections to recruit, transport and abuse girls and young women. The claims were brought under New York City’s Gender-Motivated Violence Protection Act, which permits survivors to sue not only alleged perpetrators but also people or institutions accused of facilitating the abuse.<br /><br />Combining the lawsuits does not decide whether Wexner is liable, but it streamlines the litigation by placing the survivors’ claims before one judge and allowing evidence, witness testimony and pretrial disputes to be handled together. Wexner has denied knowing about Epstein’s crimes and maintains that he was deceived and financially exploited by Epstein, arguing that the complaints lack a factual basis and will be vigorously contested. The survivors, however, contend that Epstein could not have built his fortune, reputation and trafficking infrastructure without the access and legitimacy Wexner provided. The consolidated case will therefore focus heavily on what Wexner knew, when he knew it and whether his financial and professional relationship with Epstein legally amounted to enabling the abuse.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.wtrf.com/news/epstein-survivors-lawsuits-against-les-wexner-combined-into-one-case/?nxsparam=1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein survivors’ lawsuits against Les Wexner combined into one case | WTRF</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>647</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Murder in Moscow: The Human Cost of Bryan Kohberger’s Appeal  (8/3/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-the-human-cost-of-bryan-kohberger-s-appeal-8-3-26--73388112</link><description><![CDATA[Bryan Kohberger’s effort to withdraw his guilty plea is likely to place the families of Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin back into a legal process they had been told was effectively over. The plea agreement was intended to provide finality by guaranteeing that Kohberger would spend the rest of his life in prison without the uncertainty of a capital trial, years of appeals or repeated courtroom hearings. For relatives who supported the deal, that certainty was a central part of the agreement. Kohberger’s renewed claim of innocence now threatens to disrupt that sense of closure and return the case to the center of public and legal attention.<br /><br />Even if the legal challenge ultimately fails, the process could still require new hearings, additional filings and another round of intense media coverage. That would force the families to revisit the murders, the evidence and the loss of their loved ones after many had begun trying to move forward under the belief that the criminal case had reached its conclusion. Kohberger’s appeal therefore carries consequences beyond the courtroom, potentially extending the emotional toll on families who accepted the plea as the closest available form of final resolution.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@proton<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://nypost.com/2026/07/31/us-news/sick-bryan-kohbergers-not-guilty-stunt-shows-hes-still-torturing-victims-families-behind-bars-author/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">How sick Bryan Kohberger is still torturing heartbroken Idaho victims’ families behind bars: author</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73388112</guid><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 14:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73388112/kohbergertorturefamiliesstill.mp3" length="14212746" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2b143307-8a4c-4f9d-9707-aa6cb4f267e4/2b143307-8a4c-4f9d-9707-aa6cb4f267e4.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2b143307-8a4c-4f9d-9707-aa6cb4f267e4/2b143307-8a4c-4f9d-9707-aa6cb4f267e4.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2b143307-8a4c-4f9d-9707-aa6cb4f267e4/2b143307-8a4c-4f9d-9707-aa6cb4f267e4.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Bryan Kohberger’s effort to withdraw his guilty plea is likely to place the families of Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin back into a legal process they had been told was effectively over. The plea agreement was intended...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Bryan Kohberger’s effort to withdraw his guilty plea is likely to place the families of Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin back into a legal process they had been told was effectively over. The plea agreement was intended to provide finality by guaranteeing that Kohberger would spend the rest of his life in prison without the uncertainty of a capital trial, years of appeals or repeated courtroom hearings. For relatives who supported the deal, that certainty was a central part of the agreement. Kohberger’s renewed claim of innocence now threatens to disrupt that sense of closure and return the case to the center of public and legal attention.<br /><br />Even if the legal challenge ultimately fails, the process could still require new hearings, additional filings and another round of intense media coverage. That would force the families to revisit the murders, the evidence and the loss of their loved ones after many had begun trying to move forward under the belief that the criminal case had reached its conclusion. Kohberger’s appeal therefore carries consequences beyond the courtroom, potentially extending the emotional toll on families who accepted the plea as the closest available form of final resolution.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@proton<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://nypost.com/2026/07/31/us-news/sick-bryan-kohbergers-not-guilty-stunt-shows-hes-still-torturing-victims-families-behind-bars-author/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">How sick Bryan Kohberger is still torturing heartbroken Idaho victims’ families behind bars: author</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>889</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Judge Sullivan Receives Epstein Files After DOJ Runs Out the Clock  (8/3/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/judge-sullivan-receives-epstein-files-after-doj-runs-out-the-clock-8-3-26--73359857</link><description><![CDATA[The Justice Department delivered the disputed Jeffrey Epstein materials to U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan at the edge of the court-imposed deadline, complying only after Sullivan ordered the government to provide less-redacted records or justify why the information should remain concealed. The material included emails involving Epstein, names removed from a draft indictment, references to possible co-conspirators and underlying FBI interview records. Sullivan issued the order in journalist Katie Phang’s lawsuit challenging the DOJ’s compliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act, after concluding that the department had failed to meaningfully answer several of her arguments and had already missed an earlier deadline.<br /><br />Although the last-minute submission technically placed the requested material before the court, it did not make the records immediately available to Phang or the public. Sullivan would still have to review the documents and determine whether the DOJ’s redactions and withholding claims were legally justified. The timing reinforced criticism that the department was treating disclosure as something to resist until compelled, rather than an obligation to fulfill promptly. After months of delayed releases, incomplete explanations and litigation over the redactions, handing the records over at the deadline looked less like voluntary transparency and more like reluctant compliance under direct judicial pressure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.alternet.org/trump-jeffrey-epstein-todd-blanche/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Blanche surrenders unredacted Epstein files within minutes of judge's deadline - Alternet.org</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73359857</guid><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 12:30:23 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73359857/dojgivesdocumentstojudgesullivan.mp3" length="11391103" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5f8911de-37e9-4a9d-8855-a84bea00ab6c/5f8911de-37e9-4a9d-8855-a84bea00ab6c.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5f8911de-37e9-4a9d-8855-a84bea00ab6c/5f8911de-37e9-4a9d-8855-a84bea00ab6c.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5f8911de-37e9-4a9d-8855-a84bea00ab6c/5f8911de-37e9-4a9d-8855-a84bea00ab6c.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Justice Department delivered the disputed Jeffrey Epstein materials to U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan at the edge of the court-imposed deadline, complying only after Sullivan ordered the government to provide less-redacted records or justify...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Justice Department delivered the disputed Jeffrey Epstein materials to U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan at the edge of the court-imposed deadline, complying only after Sullivan ordered the government to provide less-redacted records or justify why the information should remain concealed. The material included emails involving Epstein, names removed from a draft indictment, references to possible co-conspirators and underlying FBI interview records. Sullivan issued the order in journalist Katie Phang’s lawsuit challenging the DOJ’s compliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act, after concluding that the department had failed to meaningfully answer several of her arguments and had already missed an earlier deadline.<br /><br />Although the last-minute submission technically placed the requested material before the court, it did not make the records immediately available to Phang or the public. Sullivan would still have to review the documents and determine whether the DOJ’s redactions and withholding claims were legally justified. The timing reinforced criticism that the department was treating disclosure as something to resist until compelled, rather than an obligation to fulfill promptly. After months of delayed releases, incomplete explanations and litigation over the redactions, handing the records over at the deadline looked less like voluntary transparency and more like reluctant compliance under direct judicial pressure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.alternet.org/trump-jeffrey-epstein-todd-blanche/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Blanche surrenders unredacted Epstein files within minutes of judge's deadline - Alternet.org</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>712</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   PROMIS, Maxwell, Mossad, and Epstein’s Network (8/3/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-promis-maxwell-mossad-and-epstein-s-network-8-3-26--73338563</link><description><![CDATA[The PROMIS software scandal and the Jeffrey Epstein case, while separated by decades and context, share strikingly similar hallmarks. PROMIS began as a prosecutorial tool but was allegedly modified by intelligence services like Mossad to include backdoors, enabling covert surveillance when installed in foreign governments and financial institutions. Robert Maxwell, the British media tycoon and suspected Mossad operative, was said to have played a major role in distributing this compromised software worldwide. His involvement linked media, finance, and espionage, and his mysterious death only deepened suspicions. PROMIS thus became emblematic of how intelligence agencies use front men, plausible enterprises, and legal suppression to conceal operations while extracting information and leverage from their targets.<br /><br />Epstein’s operation followed a parallel structure. Through Ghislaine Maxwell — Robert Maxwell’s daughter — the same networks of access and intelligence may have carried forward into a different form of compromise: sexual blackmail rather than software surveillance. Epstein’s properties were wired for monitoring, his connections spanned politics and finance, and his prosecution was undermined by plea deals and sealed files, much like PROMIS inquiries were stifled by classified reports and redactions. In both scandals, powerful people were protected, evidence was obscured, and key figures died under suspicious circumstances. The echoes between PROMIS and Epstein suggest not isolated scandals but a recurring playbook of intelligence tradecraft: fronts, leverage, secrecy, and coverups designed to protect those at the very top.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73338563</guid><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73338563/megapromisepstein.mp3" length="24046489" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a5c5ad53-cc8d-495f-9226-cde1d0909ea4/a5c5ad53-cc8d-495f-9226-cde1d0909ea4.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a5c5ad53-cc8d-495f-9226-cde1d0909ea4/a5c5ad53-cc8d-495f-9226-cde1d0909ea4.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a5c5ad53-cc8d-495f-9226-cde1d0909ea4/a5c5ad53-cc8d-495f-9226-cde1d0909ea4.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The PROMIS software scandal and the Jeffrey Epstein case, while separated by decades and context, share strikingly similar hallmarks. PROMIS began as a prosecutorial tool but was allegedly modified by intelligence services like Mossad to include...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The PROMIS software scandal and the Jeffrey Epstein case, while separated by decades and context, share strikingly similar hallmarks. PROMIS began as a prosecutorial tool but was allegedly modified by intelligence services like Mossad to include backdoors, enabling covert surveillance when installed in foreign governments and financial institutions. Robert Maxwell, the British media tycoon and suspected Mossad operative, was said to have played a major role in distributing this compromised software worldwide. His involvement linked media, finance, and espionage, and his mysterious death only deepened suspicions. PROMIS thus became emblematic of how intelligence agencies use front men, plausible enterprises, and legal suppression to conceal operations while extracting information and leverage from their targets.<br /><br />Epstein’s operation followed a parallel structure. Through Ghislaine Maxwell — Robert Maxwell’s daughter — the same networks of access and intelligence may have carried forward into a different form of compromise: sexual blackmail rather than software surveillance. Epstein’s properties were wired for monitoring, his connections spanned politics and finance, and his prosecution was undermined by plea deals and sealed files, much like PROMIS inquiries were stifled by classified reports and redactions. In both scandals, powerful people were protected, evidence was obscured, and key figures died under suspicious circumstances. The echoes between PROMIS and Epstein suggest not isolated scandals but a recurring playbook of intelligence tradecraft: fronts, leverage, secrecy, and coverups designed to protect those at the very top.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1503</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Sarah Ransome And The Op-Ed In The Washington Post (8/3/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-sarah-ransome-and-the-op-ed-in-the-washington-post-8-3-26--73338562</link><description><![CDATA[In her Washington Post op-ed, Sarah Ransome recounts how surviving Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell’s trafficking operation did not end with their convictions but instead marked the beginning of another battle: being disbelieved, dismissed, and blamed because she was an adult when she was trafficked. Ransome explains that media coverage often centers on underage victims while overlooking the many women who, like her, were legally adults yet manipulated, coerced, and abused over prolonged periods. She describes the pervasive “gaslighting” she faced from society, friends, family, and authorities who questioned her credibility, branded her with derogatory labels, and minimized the horrors she endured simply because she was not a minor at the time. For years, this skepticism compounded her trauma, making recovery even more difficult and isolating her from support.<br /><br /><br />Ransome also reflects on the catharsis of hearing Ghislaine Maxwell’s shackles at sentencing and finally reading her impact statement in court, which she views as a significant step toward reclaiming her voice and self-worth. She emphasizes that justice remains incomplete while powerful enablers and institutions that allowed Epstein and Maxwell to operate with impunity have not been fully held accountable. Ransome urges broader recognition of all survivors — regardless of age at the time of abuse — and calls for societal change in how adult trafficking victims are understood and supported.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbyapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73338562</guid><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73338562/megasarahransomeopedwashpo.mp3" length="30876360" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/34db0f36-3a5d-481c-8f70-4ca9b0b28af3/34db0f36-3a5d-481c-8f70-4ca9b0b28af3.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/34db0f36-3a5d-481c-8f70-4ca9b0b28af3/34db0f36-3a5d-481c-8f70-4ca9b0b28af3.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/34db0f36-3a5d-481c-8f70-4ca9b0b28af3/34db0f36-3a5d-481c-8f70-4ca9b0b28af3.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In her Washington Post op-ed, Sarah Ransome recounts how surviving Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell’s trafficking operation did not end with their convictions but instead marked the beginning of another battle: being disbelieved, dismissed, and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In her Washington Post op-ed, Sarah Ransome recounts how surviving Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell’s trafficking operation did not end with their convictions but instead marked the beginning of another battle: being disbelieved, dismissed, and blamed because she was an adult when she was trafficked. Ransome explains that media coverage often centers on underage victims while overlooking the many women who, like her, were legally adults yet manipulated, coerced, and abused over prolonged periods. She describes the pervasive “gaslighting” she faced from society, friends, family, and authorities who questioned her credibility, branded her with derogatory labels, and minimized the horrors she endured simply because she was not a minor at the time. For years, this skepticism compounded her trauma, making recovery even more difficult and isolating her from support.<br /><br /><br />Ransome also reflects on the catharsis of hearing Ghislaine Maxwell’s shackles at sentencing and finally reading her impact statement in court, which she views as a significant step toward reclaiming her voice and self-worth. She emphasizes that justice remains incomplete while powerful enablers and institutions that allowed Epstein and Maxwell to operate with impunity have not been fully held accountable. Ransome urges broader recognition of all survivors — regardless of age at the time of abuse — and calls for societal change in how adult trafficking victims are understood and supported.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbyapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1930</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The Unredacted Deposition Of James Michael Austrich  (8/2/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-unredacted-deposition-of-james-michael-austrich-8-2-26--73338561</link><description><![CDATA[The climb up the mountain of Epstein documents continues in this episode as we take a look at the deposition of James Michael Austrich, a former boyfriend of Virginia Roberts.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6250471-Epstein-Docs" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein Docs - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br /><br />If you'd like to help support the podcast:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.gofundme.com/f/the-epstein-chronicles?utm_campaign=p_lico+share-sheet&amp;utm_medium=copy_link&amp;utm_source=customer" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Fundraiser by Bobby Capucci : The Epstein Chronicles (gofundme.com)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73338561</guid><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73338561/megaaustrichdeposition.mp3" length="24822222" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/98cec7e9-45f3-4d97-a5fa-08630ee42467/98cec7e9-45f3-4d97-a5fa-08630ee42467.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/98cec7e9-45f3-4d97-a5fa-08630ee42467/98cec7e9-45f3-4d97-a5fa-08630ee42467.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/98cec7e9-45f3-4d97-a5fa-08630ee42467/98cec7e9-45f3-4d97-a5fa-08630ee42467.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The climb up the mountain of Epstein documents continues in this episode as we take a look at the deposition of James Michael Austrich, a former boyfriend of Virginia Roberts.






to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The climb up the mountain of Epstein documents continues in this episode as we take a look at the deposition of James Michael Austrich, a former boyfriend of Virginia Roberts.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6250471-Epstein-Docs" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein Docs - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br /><br />If you'd like to help support the podcast:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.gofundme.com/f/the-epstein-chronicles?utm_campaign=p_lico+share-sheet&amp;utm_medium=copy_link&amp;utm_source=customer" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Fundraiser by Bobby Capucci : The Epstein Chronicles (gofundme.com)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1552</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Murder In Moscow:  Transcripts From The Closed IGG Hearing (Part 13)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-transcripts-from-the-closed-igg-hearing-part-13--73220536</link><description><![CDATA[On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), which they argued violated Kohberger's Fourth Amendment rights. Detective Brett Payne testified that the IGG lead was treated as a tip, with further independent investigation conducted to substantiate its validity. Defense expert Dr. Leah Larkin suggested potential violations of FBI policy and genealogy database terms of service during the IGG process. However, Judge Hippler expressed skepticism regarding the defense's claims, noting the lack of a reasonable expectation of privacy for DNA left at a crime scene.<br /><br />Following the hearing, Judge Hippler ordered the release of a redacted transcript, balancing public interest with privacy concerns. Redactions included the names of surviving roommates and distant relatives identified through IGG. The unsealed portions provide insight into the investigative methods used and the defense's challenges to the evidence's admissibility. This development underscores the ongoing legal debates surrounding the use of IGG in criminal investigations and its implications for privacy and constitutional rights.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/022125-Transcript-Redacted-hearing-held-Jan23-2025.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">KB-25-01-23-Hearing-Redacted.ecl</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73220536</guid><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73220536/iggtranscripts13.mp3" length="13788099" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e5086497-4b66-44ad-bb5c-8dd4ae511a2a/e5086497-4b66-44ad-bb5c-8dd4ae511a2a.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e5086497-4b66-44ad-bb5c-8dd4ae511a2a/e5086497-4b66-44ad-bb5c-8dd4ae511a2a.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e5086497-4b66-44ad-bb5c-8dd4ae511a2a/e5086497-4b66-44ad-bb5c-8dd4ae511a2a.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG),...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), which they argued violated Kohberger's Fourth Amendment rights. Detective Brett Payne testified that the IGG lead was treated as a tip, with further independent investigation conducted to substantiate its validity. Defense expert Dr. Leah Larkin suggested potential violations of FBI policy and genealogy database terms of service during the IGG process. However, Judge Hippler expressed skepticism regarding the defense's claims, noting the lack of a reasonable expectation of privacy for DNA left at a crime scene.<br /><br />Following the hearing, Judge Hippler ordered the release of a redacted transcript, balancing public interest with privacy concerns. Redactions included the names of surviving roommates and distant relatives identified through IGG. The unsealed portions provide insight into the investigative methods used and the defense's challenges to the evidence's admissibility. This development underscores the ongoing legal debates surrounding the use of IGG in criminal investigations and its implications for privacy and constitutional rights.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/022125-Transcript-Redacted-hearing-held-Jan23-2025.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">KB-25-01-23-Hearing-Redacted.ecl</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>862</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Murder In Moscow:  Transcripts From The Closed IGG Hearing (Part 12)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-transcripts-from-the-closed-igg-hearing-part-12--73220543</link><description><![CDATA[On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), which they argued violated Kohberger's Fourth Amendment rights. Detective Brett Payne testified that the IGG lead was treated as a tip, with further independent investigation conducted to substantiate its validity. Defense expert Dr. Leah Larkin suggested potential violations of FBI policy and genealogy database terms of service during the IGG process. However, Judge Hippler expressed skepticism regarding the defense's claims, noting the lack of a reasonable expectation of privacy for DNA left at a crime scene.<br /><br />Following the hearing, Judge Hippler ordered the release of a redacted transcript, balancing public interest with privacy concerns. Redactions included the names of surviving roommates and distant relatives identified through IGG. The unsealed portions provide insight into the investigative methods used and the defense's challenges to the evidence's admissibility. This development underscores the ongoing legal debates surrounding the use of IGG in criminal investigations and its implications for privacy and constitutional rights.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/022125-Transcript-Redacted-hearing-held-Jan23-2025.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">KB-25-01-23-Hearing-Redacted.ecl</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73220543</guid><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73220543/iggtranscripts12.mp3" length="12292223" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/80c9836f-7e57-4bf7-a022-8c8ac151ad3b/80c9836f-7e57-4bf7-a022-8c8ac151ad3b.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/80c9836f-7e57-4bf7-a022-8c8ac151ad3b/80c9836f-7e57-4bf7-a022-8c8ac151ad3b.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/80c9836f-7e57-4bf7-a022-8c8ac151ad3b/80c9836f-7e57-4bf7-a022-8c8ac151ad3b.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG),...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), which they argued violated Kohberger's Fourth Amendment rights. Detective Brett Payne testified that the IGG lead was treated as a tip, with further independent investigation conducted to substantiate its validity. Defense expert Dr. Leah Larkin suggested potential violations of FBI policy and genealogy database terms of service during the IGG process. However, Judge Hippler expressed skepticism regarding the defense's claims, noting the lack of a reasonable expectation of privacy for DNA left at a crime scene.<br /><br />Following the hearing, Judge Hippler ordered the release of a redacted transcript, balancing public interest with privacy concerns. Redactions included the names of surviving roommates and distant relatives identified through IGG. The unsealed portions provide insight into the investigative methods used and the defense's challenges to the evidence's admissibility. This development underscores the ongoing legal debates surrounding the use of IGG in criminal investigations and its implications for privacy and constitutional rights.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/022125-Transcript-Redacted-hearing-held-Jan23-2025.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">KB-25-01-23-Hearing-Redacted.ecl</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>769</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Murder In Moscow:  Transcripts From The Closed IGG Hearing (Part 11)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-transcripts-from-the-closed-igg-hearing-part-11--73221018</link><description><![CDATA[On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), which they argued violated Kohberger's Fourth Amendment rights. Detective Brett Payne testified that the IGG lead was treated as a tip, with further independent investigation conducted to substantiate its validity. Defense expert Dr. Leah Larkin suggested potential violations of FBI policy and genealogy database terms of service during the IGG process. However, Judge Hippler expressed skepticism regarding the defense's claims, noting the lack of a reasonable expectation of privacy for DNA left at a crime scene.<br /><br />Following the hearing, Judge Hippler ordered the release of a redacted transcript, balancing public interest with privacy concerns. Redactions included the names of surviving roommates and distant relatives identified through IGG. The unsealed portions provide insight into the investigative methods used and the defense's challenges to the evidence's admissibility. This development underscores the ongoing legal debates surrounding the use of IGG in criminal investigations and its implications for privacy and constitutional rights.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/022125-Transcript-Redacted-hearing-held-Jan23-2025.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">KB-25-01-23-Hearing-Redacted.ecl</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73221018</guid><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73221018/iggtranscripts1.mp3" length="11809062" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/85d888c9-3b4d-45cb-86cb-71da696bfef0/85d888c9-3b4d-45cb-86cb-71da696bfef0.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/85d888c9-3b4d-45cb-86cb-71da696bfef0/85d888c9-3b4d-45cb-86cb-71da696bfef0.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/85d888c9-3b4d-45cb-86cb-71da696bfef0/85d888c9-3b4d-45cb-86cb-71da696bfef0.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG),...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), which they argued violated Kohberger's Fourth Amendment rights. Detective Brett Payne testified that the IGG lead was treated as a tip, with further independent investigation conducted to substantiate its validity. Defense expert Dr. Leah Larkin suggested potential violations of FBI policy and genealogy database terms of service during the IGG process. However, Judge Hippler expressed skepticism regarding the defense's claims, noting the lack of a reasonable expectation of privacy for DNA left at a crime scene.<br /><br />Following the hearing, Judge Hippler ordered the release of a redacted transcript, balancing public interest with privacy concerns. Redactions included the names of surviving roommates and distant relatives identified through IGG. The unsealed portions provide insight into the investigative methods used and the defense's challenges to the evidence's admissibility. This development underscores the ongoing legal debates surrounding the use of IGG in criminal investigations and its implications for privacy and constitutional rights.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/022125-Transcript-Redacted-hearing-held-Jan23-2025.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">KB-25-01-23-Hearing-Redacted.ecl</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>739</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Transcripts From The Hearing Dealing With Tyler Robinson’s Courtroom Appearance (Part 8) (8/2/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/transcripts-from-the-hearing-dealing-with-tyler-robinson-s-courtroom-appearance-part-8-8-2-26--73323457</link><description><![CDATA[The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson’s request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.<br /><br />Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff’s office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk’s shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff’s office’s filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Monday<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2025/12/tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73323457</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73323457/robinsonhearingtranscripts8.mp3" length="9359822" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/fae25879-6a33-4fef-918c-95948434b811/fae25879-6a33-4fef-918c-95948434b811.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/fae25879-6a33-4fef-918c-95948434b811/fae25879-6a33-4fef-918c-95948434b811.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/fae25879-6a33-4fef-918c-95948434b811/fae25879-6a33-4fef-918c-95948434b811.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson’s request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson’s request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.<br /><br />Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff’s office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk’s shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff’s office’s filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Monday<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2025/12/tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>585</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvu</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Ted Waitt And The Transcript From His Epstein Related Trip To Congress (Part 8) (8/2/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/ted-waitt-and-the-transcript-from-his-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-8-8-2-26--73323433</link><description><![CDATA[Ted Waitt told the House Oversight Committee that he met Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein at a Hong Kong dinner in November 2003 and began dating Maxwell the following year, remaining in a relationship with her until September 2010. Waitt portrayed his own contact with Epstein as extremely limited, saying he had only a brief introduction at the dinner, one arranged meeting at Maxwell’s New York residence and two later chance encounters. He said he never communicated with Epstein by phone or email and had no business or financial relationship with him. Waitt testified that Maxwell described Epstein positively as a brilliant investor and money manager and told him that, after their romantic relationship ended, she continued working as an estate manager overseeing his properties and staff.<br /><br />Waitt said he wanted Maxwell to stop working for Epstein because Epstein was her former boyfriend, but claimed he had no knowledge at the time of their criminal conduct and never witnessed abuse, coercion or trafficking. He repeatedly said he could not confirm how much work Maxwell continued doing for Epstein while they dated, despite their seven-year relationship, and he denied knowing whether Epstein manipulated or abused her. Waitt also acknowledged that Maxwell had been around his four children, three of whom were girls, and said that had he known then what he knows now, he never would have befriended her or allowed her near them. His testimony largely presented him as someone who was intimately involved with Maxwell for years while remaining unaware of the reality of her relationship with Epstein and the crimes for which she was later convicted.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2026/05/Waitt-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GO120551</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73323433</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73323433/waitt8.mp3" length="13088017" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/faea4251-c903-4911-bdad-351347f77865/faea4251-c903-4911-bdad-351347f77865.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/faea4251-c903-4911-bdad-351347f77865/faea4251-c903-4911-bdad-351347f77865.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/faea4251-c903-4911-bdad-351347f77865/faea4251-c903-4911-bdad-351347f77865.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Ted Waitt told the House Oversight Committee that he met Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein at a Hong Kong dinner in November 2003 and began dating Maxwell the following year, remaining in a relationship with her until September 2010. Waitt...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Ted Waitt told the House Oversight Committee that he met Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein at a Hong Kong dinner in November 2003 and began dating Maxwell the following year, remaining in a relationship with her until September 2010. Waitt portrayed his own contact with Epstein as extremely limited, saying he had only a brief introduction at the dinner, one arranged meeting at Maxwell’s New York residence and two later chance encounters. He said he never communicated with Epstein by phone or email and had no business or financial relationship with him. Waitt testified that Maxwell described Epstein positively as a brilliant investor and money manager and told him that, after their romantic relationship ended, she continued working as an estate manager overseeing his properties and staff.<br /><br />Waitt said he wanted Maxwell to stop working for Epstein because Epstein was her former boyfriend, but claimed he had no knowledge at the time of their criminal conduct and never witnessed abuse, coercion or trafficking. He repeatedly said he could not confirm how much work Maxwell continued doing for Epstein while they dated, despite their seven-year relationship, and he denied knowing whether Epstein manipulated or abused her. Waitt also acknowledged that Maxwell had been around his four children, three of whom were girls, and said that had he known then what he knows now, he never would have befriended her or allowed her near them. His testimony largely presented him as someone who was intimately involved with Maxwell for years while remaining unaware of the reality of her relationship with Epstein and the crimes for which she was later convicted.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2026/05/Waitt-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GO120551</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>818</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Ted Waitt And The Transcript From His Epstein Related Trip To Congress (Part 7) (8/2/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/ted-waitt-and-the-transcript-from-his-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-7-8-2-26--73323432</link><description><![CDATA[Ted Waitt told the House Oversight Committee that he met Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein at a Hong Kong dinner in November 2003 and began dating Maxwell the following year, remaining in a relationship with her until September 2010. Waitt portrayed his own contact with Epstein as extremely limited, saying he had only a brief introduction at the dinner, one arranged meeting at Maxwell’s New York residence and two later chance encounters. He said he never communicated with Epstein by phone or email and had no business or financial relationship with him. Waitt testified that Maxwell described Epstein positively as a brilliant investor and money manager and told him that, after their romantic relationship ended, she continued working as an estate manager overseeing his properties and staff.<br /><br />Waitt said he wanted Maxwell to stop working for Epstein because Epstein was her former boyfriend, but claimed he had no knowledge at the time of their criminal conduct and never witnessed abuse, coercion or trafficking. He repeatedly said he could not confirm how much work Maxwell continued doing for Epstein while they dated, despite their seven-year relationship, and he denied knowing whether Epstein manipulated or abused her. Waitt also acknowledged that Maxwell had been around his four children, three of whom were girls, and said that had he known then what he knows now, he never would have befriended her or allowed her near them. His testimony largely presented him as someone who was intimately involved with Maxwell for years while remaining unaware of the reality of her relationship with Epstein and the crimes for which she was later convicted.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2026/05/Waitt-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GO120551</a><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73323432</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 18:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73323432/waitt7.mp3" length="11521506" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a6de003d-baef-44c7-941d-a21b71d23414/a6de003d-baef-44c7-941d-a21b71d23414.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a6de003d-baef-44c7-941d-a21b71d23414/a6de003d-baef-44c7-941d-a21b71d23414.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a6de003d-baef-44c7-941d-a21b71d23414/a6de003d-baef-44c7-941d-a21b71d23414.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Ted Waitt told the House Oversight Committee that he met Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein at a Hong Kong dinner in November 2003 and began dating Maxwell the following year, remaining in a relationship with her until September 2010. Waitt...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Ted Waitt told the House Oversight Committee that he met Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein at a Hong Kong dinner in November 2003 and began dating Maxwell the following year, remaining in a relationship with her until September 2010. Waitt portrayed his own contact with Epstein as extremely limited, saying he had only a brief introduction at the dinner, one arranged meeting at Maxwell’s New York residence and two later chance encounters. He said he never communicated with Epstein by phone or email and had no business or financial relationship with him. Waitt testified that Maxwell described Epstein positively as a brilliant investor and money manager and told him that, after their romantic relationship ended, she continued working as an estate manager overseeing his properties and staff.<br /><br />Waitt said he wanted Maxwell to stop working for Epstein because Epstein was her former boyfriend, but claimed he had no knowledge at the time of their criminal conduct and never witnessed abuse, coercion or trafficking. He repeatedly said he could not confirm how much work Maxwell continued doing for Epstein while they dated, despite their seven-year relationship, and he denied knowing whether Epstein manipulated or abused her. Waitt also acknowledged that Maxwell had been around his four children, three of whom were girls, and said that had he known then what he knows now, he never would have befriended her or allowed her near them. His testimony largely presented him as someone who was intimately involved with Maxwell for years while remaining unaware of the reality of her relationship with Epstein and the crimes for which she was later convicted.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2026/05/Waitt-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GO120551</a><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>721</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Ted Waitt And The Transcript From His Epstein Related Trip To Congress (Part 6) (8/1/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/ted-waitt-and-the-transcript-from-his-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-6-8-1-26--73318293</link><description><![CDATA[Ted Waitt told the House Oversight Committee that he met Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein at a Hong Kong dinner in November 2003 and began dating Maxwell the following year, remaining in a relationship with her until September 2010. Waitt portrayed his own contact with Epstein as extremely limited, saying he had only a brief introduction at the dinner, one arranged meeting at Maxwell’s New York residence and two later chance encounters. He said he never communicated with Epstein by phone or email and had no business or financial relationship with him. Waitt testified that Maxwell described Epstein positively as a brilliant investor and money manager and told him that, after their romantic relationship ended, she continued working as an estate manager overseeing his properties and staff.<br /><br />Waitt said he wanted Maxwell to stop working for Epstein because Epstein was her former boyfriend, but claimed he had no knowledge at the time of their criminal conduct and never witnessed abuse, coercion or trafficking. He repeatedly said he could not confirm how much work Maxwell continued doing for Epstein while they dated, despite their seven-year relationship, and he denied knowing whether Epstein manipulated or abused her. Waitt also acknowledged that Maxwell had been around his four children, three of whom were girls, and said that had he known then what he knows now, he never would have befriended her or allowed her near them. His testimony largely presented him as someone who was intimately involved with Maxwell for years while remaining unaware of the reality of her relationship with Epstein and the crimes for which she was later convicted.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2026/05/Waitt-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GO120551</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73318293</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73318293/waitt6.mp3" length="12329839" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/bd903f0c-4fee-4b1d-acdf-3ed2d67ed0a5/bd903f0c-4fee-4b1d-acdf-3ed2d67ed0a5.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/bd903f0c-4fee-4b1d-acdf-3ed2d67ed0a5/bd903f0c-4fee-4b1d-acdf-3ed2d67ed0a5.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/bd903f0c-4fee-4b1d-acdf-3ed2d67ed0a5/bd903f0c-4fee-4b1d-acdf-3ed2d67ed0a5.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Ted Waitt told the House Oversight Committee that he met Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein at a Hong Kong dinner in November 2003 and began dating Maxwell the following year, remaining in a relationship with her until September 2010. Waitt...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Ted Waitt told the House Oversight Committee that he met Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein at a Hong Kong dinner in November 2003 and began dating Maxwell the following year, remaining in a relationship with her until September 2010. Waitt portrayed his own contact with Epstein as extremely limited, saying he had only a brief introduction at the dinner, one arranged meeting at Maxwell’s New York residence and two later chance encounters. He said he never communicated with Epstein by phone or email and had no business or financial relationship with him. Waitt testified that Maxwell described Epstein positively as a brilliant investor and money manager and told him that, after their romantic relationship ended, she continued working as an estate manager overseeing his properties and staff.<br /><br />Waitt said he wanted Maxwell to stop working for Epstein because Epstein was her former boyfriend, but claimed he had no knowledge at the time of their criminal conduct and never witnessed abuse, coercion or trafficking. He repeatedly said he could not confirm how much work Maxwell continued doing for Epstein while they dated, despite their seven-year relationship, and he denied knowing whether Epstein manipulated or abused her. Waitt also acknowledged that Maxwell had been around his four children, three of whom were girls, and said that had he known then what he knows now, he never would have befriended her or allowed her near them. His testimony largely presented him as someone who was intimately involved with Maxwell for years while remaining unaware of the reality of her relationship with Epstein and the crimes for which she was later convicted.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2026/05/Waitt-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GO120551</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>771</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Jeffrey Epstein And His Friendship With The Brain Doctor (8/1/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-his-friendship-with-the-brain-doctor-8-1-26--73316485</link><description><![CDATA[Melanie Walker’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein reportedly began in the early 1990s, when she said Donald Trump introduced them at New York’s Plaza Hotel. Walker, then a recent college graduate, initially discussed modeling opportunities with Epstein, but he reportedly encouraged her to pursue medicine instead and became a longtime mentor, patron and adviser. She later lived at an address in a Manhattan building where Epstein controlled several apartments, traveled aboard his aircraft and was described as his “science adviser.” Their association lasted for decades, extending into Walker’s career as a physician, neuroscientist and senior figure within the Bill &amp; Melinda Gates Foundation and Bill Gates’s private office. Walker’s attorney has characterized her as an Epstein survivor who endured a coercive relationship, although she has not publicly accused Epstein of sexual abuse or filed a claim against his estate.<br /><br />Walker also appears to have served as an important bridge between Epstein and Bill Gates’s professional network. While working within the Gates organization, she introduced Epstein to Gates science adviser Boris Nikolic, reportedly praised Epstein’s influence on her career and minimized the seriousness of his 2008 conviction. Nikolic subsequently introduced Epstein to Gates, helping Epstein secure access to meetings involving philanthropy, science and global health. Records also show Walker continuing to communicate closely with Epstein, sharing information from Gates’s orbit and relaying messages between the two worlds. Her story therefore contains a complicated duality: she was described by her lawyer as someone subjected to Epstein’s coercion, while the documented record also shows her helping preserve his credibility and facilitating his entrance into one of the most powerful philanthropic networks in the world.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73316485</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73316485/megaepsteinneurosurgeongatesandy.mp3" length="45734421" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d072dbbd-187d-4ef2-b76a-43ca9b24893a/d072dbbd-187d-4ef2-b76a-43ca9b24893a.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d072dbbd-187d-4ef2-b76a-43ca9b24893a/d072dbbd-187d-4ef2-b76a-43ca9b24893a.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d072dbbd-187d-4ef2-b76a-43ca9b24893a/d072dbbd-187d-4ef2-b76a-43ca9b24893a.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Melanie Walker’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein reportedly began in the early 1990s, when she said Donald Trump introduced them at New York’s Plaza Hotel. Walker, then a recent college graduate, initially discussed modeling opportunities with...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Melanie Walker’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein reportedly began in the early 1990s, when she said Donald Trump introduced them at New York’s Plaza Hotel. Walker, then a recent college graduate, initially discussed modeling opportunities with Epstein, but he reportedly encouraged her to pursue medicine instead and became a longtime mentor, patron and adviser. She later lived at an address in a Manhattan building where Epstein controlled several apartments, traveled aboard his aircraft and was described as his “science adviser.” Their association lasted for decades, extending into Walker’s career as a physician, neuroscientist and senior figure within the Bill &amp; Melinda Gates Foundation and Bill Gates’s private office. Walker’s attorney has characterized her as an Epstein survivor who endured a coercive relationship, although she has not publicly accused Epstein of sexual abuse or filed a claim against his estate.<br /><br />Walker also appears to have served as an important bridge between Epstein and Bill Gates’s professional network. While working within the Gates organization, she introduced Epstein to Gates science adviser Boris Nikolic, reportedly praised Epstein’s influence on her career and minimized the seriousness of his 2008 conviction. Nikolic subsequently introduced Epstein to Gates, helping Epstein secure access to meetings involving philanthropy, science and global health. Records also show Walker continuing to communicate closely with Epstein, sharing information from Gates’s orbit and relaying messages between the two worlds. Her story therefore contains a complicated duality: she was described by her lawyer as someone subjected to Epstein’s coercion, while the documented record also shows her helping preserve his credibility and facilitating his entrance into one of the most powerful philanthropic networks in the world.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2859</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The Many Scandals Of England's Most Scandalous Royal (8/2/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-many-scandals-of-england-s-most-scandalous-royal-8-2-26--73316483</link><description><![CDATA[Prince Andrew’s repeated scandals have become a lasting liability for the British monarchy, reinforcing the perception that royal status can shield powerful people from scrutiny and consequences. His friendship with Jeffrey Epstein, the allegations made against him by Virginia Giuffre, his disastrous BBC interview and the financial settlement that followed severely damaged his credibility. His subsequent battles over royal privileges, housing, security and public appearances kept the controversy alive long after he stepped back from official duties. Each new episode made it harder for the monarchy to present his behavior as an isolated embarrassment, because the institution often appeared slow, reluctant or inconsistent in distancing itself from him.<br /><br />The damage has spread beyond Andrew because the monarchy’s legitimacy depends heavily on public trust, restraint and the belief that its members uphold higher standards. For many people, Andrew came to symbolize entitlement, secrecy and a separate system of accountability for the wealthy and well connected. The royal family’s efforts to contain the fallout have also fed broader questions about transparency, public funding and whether the institution remains relevant in modern Britain. While Andrew alone did not create republican sentiment or public frustration with the monarchy, his scandals have given critics one of their strongest arguments and contributed to growing skepticism toward the institution as a whole.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73316483</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73316483/megascandalousprinceandrew.mp3" length="50844808" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/bed8fafc-7da6-4216-a0ac-5c9f2b411009/bed8fafc-7da6-4216-a0ac-5c9f2b411009.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/bed8fafc-7da6-4216-a0ac-5c9f2b411009/bed8fafc-7da6-4216-a0ac-5c9f2b411009.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/bed8fafc-7da6-4216-a0ac-5c9f2b411009/bed8fafc-7da6-4216-a0ac-5c9f2b411009.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Prince Andrew’s repeated scandals have become a lasting liability for the British monarchy, reinforcing the perception that royal status can shield powerful people from scrutiny and consequences. His friendship with Jeffrey Epstein, the allegations...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Prince Andrew’s repeated scandals have become a lasting liability for the British monarchy, reinforcing the perception that royal status can shield powerful people from scrutiny and consequences. His friendship with Jeffrey Epstein, the allegations made against him by Virginia Giuffre, his disastrous BBC interview and the financial settlement that followed severely damaged his credibility. His subsequent battles over royal privileges, housing, security and public appearances kept the controversy alive long after he stepped back from official duties. Each new episode made it harder for the monarchy to present his behavior as an isolated embarrassment, because the institution often appeared slow, reluctant or inconsistent in distancing itself from him.<br /><br />The damage has spread beyond Andrew because the monarchy’s legitimacy depends heavily on public trust, restraint and the belief that its members uphold higher standards. For many people, Andrew came to symbolize entitlement, secrecy and a separate system of accountability for the wealthy and well connected. The royal family’s efforts to contain the fallout have also fed broader questions about transparency, public funding and whether the institution remains relevant in modern Britain. While Andrew alone did not create republican sentiment or public frustration with the monarchy, his scandals have given critics one of their strongest arguments and contributed to growing skepticism toward the institution as a whole.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3178</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   Jeffrey Epstein And His Friends In High Places (8/2/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-his-friends-in-high-places-8-2-26--73316482</link><description><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein’s social circle demonstrated that his influence was never confined to one profession, political party or social class. He cultivated relationships with billionaires, bankers, attorneys, academics, scientists, politicians, diplomats, royalty, celebrities and leaders of prestigious institutions. Many of these people were treated as pillars of respectable society, yet they continued meeting with Epstein, accepting his hospitality, pursuing his money or benefiting from his connections even after his 2008 conviction made his conduct impossible to dismiss as mere rumor. Their presence around him helped manufacture the appearance that Epstein remained legitimate, important and safe to associate with, giving him a protective layer of prestige that ordinary criminals could never have assembled.<br /><br />Not everyone in Epstein’s orbit participated directly in his crimes, but the broader network contained no shortage of enablers who looked away, minimized warning signs, opened doors or continued doing business with him when they should have walked away. Some provided professional services, some introduced him to influential people, some defended him publicly and others treated his criminal history as an inconvenience rather than a moral disqualification. Epstein understood that respectability could be borrowed from the people surrounding him, and every prominent person who continued welcoming him helped reinforce the illusion that his wealth and connections mattered more than the girls and young women he abused. His story was therefore not only about one predator, but also about the supposedly respectable world that repeatedly made room for him.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73316482</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73316482/megaepsteinfriendsfromallwalksoflife.mp3" length="39742976" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/172c6054-c018-40eb-bc09-83292ad268c0/172c6054-c018-40eb-bc09-83292ad268c0.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/172c6054-c018-40eb-bc09-83292ad268c0/172c6054-c018-40eb-bc09-83292ad268c0.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/172c6054-c018-40eb-bc09-83292ad268c0/172c6054-c018-40eb-bc09-83292ad268c0.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jeffrey Epstein’s social circle demonstrated that his influence was never confined to one profession, political party or social class. He cultivated relationships with billionaires, bankers, attorneys, academics, scientists, politicians, diplomats,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein’s social circle demonstrated that his influence was never confined to one profession, political party or social class. He cultivated relationships with billionaires, bankers, attorneys, academics, scientists, politicians, diplomats, royalty, celebrities and leaders of prestigious institutions. Many of these people were treated as pillars of respectable society, yet they continued meeting with Epstein, accepting his hospitality, pursuing his money or benefiting from his connections even after his 2008 conviction made his conduct impossible to dismiss as mere rumor. Their presence around him helped manufacture the appearance that Epstein remained legitimate, important and safe to associate with, giving him a protective layer of prestige that ordinary criminals could never have assembled.<br /><br />Not everyone in Epstein’s orbit participated directly in his crimes, but the broader network contained no shortage of enablers who looked away, minimized warning signs, opened doors or continued doing business with him when they should have walked away. Some provided professional services, some introduced him to influential people, some defended him publicly and others treated his criminal history as an inconvenience rather than a moral disqualification. Epstein understood that respectability could be borrowed from the people surrounding him, and every prominent person who continued welcoming him helped reinforce the illusion that his wealth and connections mattered more than the girls and young women he abused. His story was therefore not only about one predator, but also about the supposedly respectable world that repeatedly made room for him.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2484</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Jeffrey Epstein And His Connection To Australian Politicians (8/2/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-his-connection-to-australian-politicians-8-2-26--73316481</link><description><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein’s connections to Australian political and business circles added another disturbing layer to the larger story of how deeply he penetrated the international elite. Katherine Keating, the daughter of former prime minister Paul Keating, visited Epstein’s Manhattan mansion, exchanged friendly communications with him and remained in contact after his 2008 conviction was publicly known. Epstein’s correspondence also referenced former prime minister Kevin Rudd as a possible guest at meetings or gatherings, although Rudd said he rejected an invitation and never met Epstein. Other prominent Australians appeared in discussions moving through Epstein’s network, demonstrating how routinely he positioned himself near political families, billionaires and influential decision-makers. Even where the records did not establish wrongdoing by those individuals, the pattern remained concerning: Epstein repeatedly gained access to the highest halls of power and used those relationships to reinforce his importance, legitimacy and international reach.<br /><br />Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s 2019 interview with 60 Minutes Australia exposed the horrifying reality concealed beneath that elite network. Giuffre described being recruited as a teenager by Ghislaine Maxwell, groomed and trafficked by Epstein, and directed toward wealthy and powerful men, including Prince Andrew, who denied her allegations. She rejected attempts to discredit the photograph showing her with Andrew and explained how Epstein’s money, political access and relationships with prominent figures created an atmosphere in which victims felt powerless and predators appeared untouchable. Seen alongside Epstein’s connections in Australia, the interview illustrated the two sides of his operation: the respectable outer world of political families, business leaders and international influence, and the hidden system of exploitation that this access helped protect. Australia was not an isolated footnote in Epstein’s story, but another example of how his network stretched across borders and into institutions that should have placed him under scrutiny rather than welcomed him inside.<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73316481</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73316481/megaepsteinvirginiaaustraliapoliticians.mp3" length="52258734" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/22efa0fe-9285-4f96-9549-158d65084d24/22efa0fe-9285-4f96-9549-158d65084d24.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/22efa0fe-9285-4f96-9549-158d65084d24/22efa0fe-9285-4f96-9549-158d65084d24.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/22efa0fe-9285-4f96-9549-158d65084d24/22efa0fe-9285-4f96-9549-158d65084d24.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jeffrey Epstein’s connections to Australian political and business circles added another disturbing layer to the larger story of how deeply he penetrated the international elite. Katherine Keating, the daughter of former prime minister Paul Keating,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein’s connections to Australian political and business circles added another disturbing layer to the larger story of how deeply he penetrated the international elite. Katherine Keating, the daughter of former prime minister Paul Keating, visited Epstein’s Manhattan mansion, exchanged friendly communications with him and remained in contact after his 2008 conviction was publicly known. Epstein’s correspondence also referenced former prime minister Kevin Rudd as a possible guest at meetings or gatherings, although Rudd said he rejected an invitation and never met Epstein. Other prominent Australians appeared in discussions moving through Epstein’s network, demonstrating how routinely he positioned himself near political families, billionaires and influential decision-makers. Even where the records did not establish wrongdoing by those individuals, the pattern remained concerning: Epstein repeatedly gained access to the highest halls of power and used those relationships to reinforce his importance, legitimacy and international reach.<br /><br />Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s 2019 interview with 60 Minutes Australia exposed the horrifying reality concealed beneath that elite network. Giuffre described being recruited as a teenager by Ghislaine Maxwell, groomed and trafficked by Epstein, and directed toward wealthy and powerful men, including Prince Andrew, who denied her allegations. She rejected attempts to discredit the photograph showing her with Andrew and explained how Epstein’s money, political access and relationships with prominent figures created an atmosphere in which victims felt powerless and predators appeared untouchable. Seen alongside Epstein’s connections in Australia, the interview illustrated the two sides of his operation: the respectable outer world of political families, business leaders and international influence, and the hidden system of exploitation that this access helped protect. Australia was not an isolated footnote in Epstein’s story, but another example of how his network stretched across borders and into institutions that should have placed him under scrutiny rather than welcomed him inside.<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3267</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Jeffrey Epstein And Men Who Kept Him Flying High (8/2/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-men-who-kept-him-flying-high-8-2-26--73316480</link><description><![CDATA[Larry Visoski and David Rodgers were far more than ordinary pilots in Jeffrey Epstein’s organization. For nearly three decades, they transported Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, young women and girls, wealthy financiers, celebrities, politicians and members of royalty between Epstein’s properties in New York, Florida, New Mexico and the U.S. Virgin Islands, as well as destinations around the world. Their aircraft provided the transportation system that allowed Epstein to move seamlessly between his homes and maintain his sprawling network of powerful associates. Visoski served as Epstein’s longtime chief pilot, while Rodgers worked alongside him and kept detailed handwritten passenger logs documenting thousands of flight segments. Although both men said they did not witness sexual misconduct aboard the planes or knowingly participate in Epstein’s crimes, their repeated presence placed them in a unique position to observe who traveled with Epstein, where they went and how frequently young female passengers accompanied him.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73316480</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73316480/megaepsteinpilots.mp3" length="64621967" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a461b259-a45a-4a75-b7b2-37a9932404a9/a461b259-a45a-4a75-b7b2-37a9932404a9.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a461b259-a45a-4a75-b7b2-37a9932404a9/a461b259-a45a-4a75-b7b2-37a9932404a9.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a461b259-a45a-4a75-b7b2-37a9932404a9/a461b259-a45a-4a75-b7b2-37a9932404a9.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Larry Visoski and David Rodgers were far more than ordinary pilots in Jeffrey Epstein’s organization. For nearly three decades, they transported Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, young women and girls, wealthy financiers, celebrities, politicians and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Larry Visoski and David Rodgers were far more than ordinary pilots in Jeffrey Epstein’s organization. For nearly three decades, they transported Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, young women and girls, wealthy financiers, celebrities, politicians and members of royalty between Epstein’s properties in New York, Florida, New Mexico and the U.S. Virgin Islands, as well as destinations around the world. Their aircraft provided the transportation system that allowed Epstein to move seamlessly between his homes and maintain his sprawling network of powerful associates. Visoski served as Epstein’s longtime chief pilot, while Rodgers worked alongside him and kept detailed handwritten passenger logs documenting thousands of flight segments. Although both men said they did not witness sexual misconduct aboard the planes or knowingly participate in Epstein’s crimes, their repeated presence placed them in a unique position to observe who traveled with Epstein, where they went and how frequently young female passengers accompanied him.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4039</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Murder In Moscow:  Transcripts From The Closed IGG Hearing (Part 10)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-transcripts-from-the-closed-igg-hearing-part-10--73220538</link><description><![CDATA[On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), which they argued violated Kohberger's Fourth Amendment rights. Detective Brett Payne testified that the IGG lead was treated as a tip, with further independent investigation conducted to substantiate its validity. Defense expert Dr. Leah Larkin suggested potential violations of FBI policy and genealogy database terms of service during the IGG process. However, Judge Hippler expressed skepticism regarding the defense's claims, noting the lack of a reasonable expectation of privacy for DNA left at a crime scene.<br /><br />Following the hearing, Judge Hippler ordered the release of a redacted transcript, balancing public interest with privacy concerns. Redactions included the names of surviving roommates and distant relatives identified through IGG. The unsealed portions provide insight into the investigative methods used and the defense's challenges to the evidence's admissibility. This development underscores the ongoing legal debates surrounding the use of IGG in criminal investigations and its implications for privacy and constitutional rights.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/022125-Transcript-Redacted-hearing-held-Jan23-2025.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">KB-25-01-23-Hearing-Redacted.ecl</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73220538</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73220538/iggtranscripts10.mp3" length="14475224" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/82ea0517-efed-4b34-bf4a-ebf345308761/82ea0517-efed-4b34-bf4a-ebf345308761.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/82ea0517-efed-4b34-bf4a-ebf345308761/82ea0517-efed-4b34-bf4a-ebf345308761.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/82ea0517-efed-4b34-bf4a-ebf345308761/82ea0517-efed-4b34-bf4a-ebf345308761.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG),...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), which they argued violated Kohberger's Fourth Amendment rights. Detective Brett Payne testified that the IGG lead was treated as a tip, with further independent investigation conducted to substantiate its validity. Defense expert Dr. Leah Larkin suggested potential violations of FBI policy and genealogy database terms of service during the IGG process. However, Judge Hippler expressed skepticism regarding the defense's claims, noting the lack of a reasonable expectation of privacy for DNA left at a crime scene.<br /><br />Following the hearing, Judge Hippler ordered the release of a redacted transcript, balancing public interest with privacy concerns. Redactions included the names of surviving roommates and distant relatives identified through IGG. The unsealed portions provide insight into the investigative methods used and the defense's challenges to the evidence's admissibility. This development underscores the ongoing legal debates surrounding the use of IGG in criminal investigations and its implications for privacy and constitutional rights.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/022125-Transcript-Redacted-hearing-held-Jan23-2025.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">KB-25-01-23-Hearing-Redacted.ecl</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>905</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Murder In Moscow:  Transcripts From The Closed IGG Hearing (Part 9)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-transcripts-from-the-closed-igg-hearing-part-9--73220539</link><description><![CDATA[On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), which they argued violated Kohberger's Fourth Amendment rights. Detective Brett Payne testified that the IGG lead was treated as a tip, with further independent investigation conducted to substantiate its validity. Defense expert Dr. Leah Larkin suggested potential violations of FBI policy and genealogy database terms of service during the IGG process. However, Judge Hippler expressed skepticism regarding the defense's claims, noting the lack of a reasonable expectation of privacy for DNA left at a crime scene.<br /><br />Following the hearing, Judge Hippler ordered the release of a redacted transcript, balancing public interest with privacy concerns. Redactions included the names of surviving roommates and distant relatives identified through IGG. The unsealed portions provide insight into the investigative methods used and the defense's challenges to the evidence's admissibility. This development underscores the ongoing legal debates surrounding the use of IGG in criminal investigations and its implications for privacy and constitutional rights.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/022125-Transcript-Redacted-hearing-held-Jan23-2025.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">KB-25-01-23-Hearing-Redacted.ecl</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73220539</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 02:30:01 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73220539/iggtranscripts9.mp3" length="16737219" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8cad8932-fcaf-42db-bf25-ddced1541f36/8cad8932-fcaf-42db-bf25-ddced1541f36.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8cad8932-fcaf-42db-bf25-ddced1541f36/8cad8932-fcaf-42db-bf25-ddced1541f36.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8cad8932-fcaf-42db-bf25-ddced1541f36/8cad8932-fcaf-42db-bf25-ddced1541f36.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG),...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), which they argued violated Kohberger's Fourth Amendment rights. Detective Brett Payne testified that the IGG lead was treated as a tip, with further independent investigation conducted to substantiate its validity. Defense expert Dr. Leah Larkin suggested potential violations of FBI policy and genealogy database terms of service during the IGG process. However, Judge Hippler expressed skepticism regarding the defense's claims, noting the lack of a reasonable expectation of privacy for DNA left at a crime scene.<br /><br />Following the hearing, Judge Hippler ordered the release of a redacted transcript, balancing public interest with privacy concerns. Redactions included the names of surviving roommates and distant relatives identified through IGG. The unsealed portions provide insight into the investigative methods used and the defense's challenges to the evidence's admissibility. This development underscores the ongoing legal debates surrounding the use of IGG in criminal investigations and its implications for privacy and constitutional rights.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/022125-Transcript-Redacted-hearing-held-Jan23-2025.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">KB-25-01-23-Hearing-Redacted.ecl</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1047</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Bryan Kohberger And His Push To Remove The Death Penalty</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/bryan-kohberger-and-his-push-to-remove-the-death-penalty--73217458</link><description><![CDATA[On November 7, 2024, Bryan Kohberger appeared in an Ada County courtroom for a hearing to challenge the prosecution's intent to seek the death penalty in his upcoming trial. Kohberger faces charges for the November 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students. His defense team argued that the death penalty is arbitrary, inappropriate under modern standards, and unconstitutional. They also contended that methods of execution, such as lethal injection and firing squads, constitute cruel and unusual punishment. The prosecution countered by stating that both Idaho and U.S. Supreme Courts have upheld the constitutionality of the death penalty.<br /><br />During the four-hour hearing, Judge Steven Hippler engaged both sides with questions, expressing concerns about the timing of the decision on execution methods, given the lengthy appeals process in death penalty cases. He questioned why a ruling on execution methods should be made now, considering that it could be over a decade before any sentence is carried out, during which time methods may change. The defense emphasized the importance of addressing the death penalty issue before jury selection, citing the impact on jury composition and trial preparation. At the conclusion of the hearing, Judge Hippler stated he would take the matters under advisement and issue written opinions in due course.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14055113/idaho-murder-suspect-bryan-kohberger-death-penalty.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Idaho murders suspect Bryan Kohberger gets no-nonsense warning from judge over potential death penalty | Daily Mail Online</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73217458</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73217458/kohdeathpenaltycourt.mp3" length="15457428" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/35971a0b-54c0-4d46-9096-972a306c9b8e/35971a0b-54c0-4d46-9096-972a306c9b8e.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/35971a0b-54c0-4d46-9096-972a306c9b8e/35971a0b-54c0-4d46-9096-972a306c9b8e.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/35971a0b-54c0-4d46-9096-972a306c9b8e/35971a0b-54c0-4d46-9096-972a306c9b8e.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On November 7, 2024, Bryan Kohberger appeared in an Ada County courtroom for a hearing to challenge the prosecution's intent to seek the death penalty in his upcoming trial. Kohberger faces charges for the November 2022 murders of four University of...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On November 7, 2024, Bryan Kohberger appeared in an Ada County courtroom for a hearing to challenge the prosecution's intent to seek the death penalty in his upcoming trial. Kohberger faces charges for the November 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students. His defense team argued that the death penalty is arbitrary, inappropriate under modern standards, and unconstitutional. They also contended that methods of execution, such as lethal injection and firing squads, constitute cruel and unusual punishment. The prosecution countered by stating that both Idaho and U.S. Supreme Courts have upheld the constitutionality of the death penalty.<br /><br />During the four-hour hearing, Judge Steven Hippler engaged both sides with questions, expressing concerns about the timing of the decision on execution methods, given the lengthy appeals process in death penalty cases. He questioned why a ruling on execution methods should be made now, considering that it could be over a decade before any sentence is carried out, during which time methods may change. The defense emphasized the importance of addressing the death penalty issue before jury selection, citing the impact on jury composition and trial preparation. At the conclusion of the hearing, Judge Hippler stated he would take the matters under advisement and issue written opinions in due course.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14055113/idaho-murder-suspect-bryan-kohberger-death-penalty.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Idaho murders suspect Bryan Kohberger gets no-nonsense warning from judge over potential death penalty | Daily Mail Online</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>967</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Transcripts From The Hearing Dealing With Tyler Robinson’s Courtroom Appearance (Part 7) (8/1/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/transcripts-from-the-hearing-dealing-with-tyler-robinson-s-courtroom-appearance-part-7-8-1-26--73318307</link><description><![CDATA[The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson’s request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.<br /><br />Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff’s office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk’s shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff’s office’s filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Monday<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2025/12/tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73318307</guid><pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73318307/robinsonhearingtranscripts7.mp3" length="11457977" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ea31bd5f-b7b7-4c81-bc96-98efac252544/ea31bd5f-b7b7-4c81-bc96-98efac252544.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ea31bd5f-b7b7-4c81-bc96-98efac252544/ea31bd5f-b7b7-4c81-bc96-98efac252544.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ea31bd5f-b7b7-4c81-bc96-98efac252544/ea31bd5f-b7b7-4c81-bc96-98efac252544.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson’s request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson’s request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.<br /><br />Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff’s office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk’s shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff’s office’s filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Monday<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2025/12/tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>717</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvu</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Ted Waitt And The Transcript From His Epstein Related Trip To Congress (Part 5) (8/1/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/ted-waitt-and-the-transcript-from-his-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-5-8-1-26--73318294</link><description><![CDATA[Ted Waitt told the House Oversight Committee that he met Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein at a Hong Kong dinner in November 2003 and began dating Maxwell the following year, remaining in a relationship with her until September 2010. Waitt portrayed his own contact with Epstein as extremely limited, saying he had only a brief introduction at the dinner, one arranged meeting at Maxwell’s New York residence and two later chance encounters. He said he never communicated with Epstein by phone or email and had no business or financial relationship with him. Waitt testified that Maxwell described Epstein positively as a brilliant investor and money manager and told him that, after their romantic relationship ended, she continued working as an estate manager overseeing his properties and staff.<br /><br />Waitt said he wanted Maxwell to stop working for Epstein because Epstein was her former boyfriend, but claimed he had no knowledge at the time of their criminal conduct and never witnessed abuse, coercion or trafficking. He repeatedly said he could not confirm how much work Maxwell continued doing for Epstein while they dated, despite their seven-year relationship, and he denied knowing whether Epstein manipulated or abused her. Waitt also acknowledged that Maxwell had been around his four children, three of whom were girls, and said that had he known then what he knows now, he never would have befriended her or allowed her near them. His testimony largely presented him as someone who was intimately involved with Maxwell for years while remaining unaware of the reality of her relationship with Epstein and the crimes for which she was later convicted.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2026/05/Waitt-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GO120551</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73318294</guid><pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73318294/waitt5.mp3" length="13095959" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8f8cf2b1-28f9-418e-a80b-97ddc7c4d063/8f8cf2b1-28f9-418e-a80b-97ddc7c4d063.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8f8cf2b1-28f9-418e-a80b-97ddc7c4d063/8f8cf2b1-28f9-418e-a80b-97ddc7c4d063.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8f8cf2b1-28f9-418e-a80b-97ddc7c4d063/8f8cf2b1-28f9-418e-a80b-97ddc7c4d063.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Ted Waitt told the House Oversight Committee that he met Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein at a Hong Kong dinner in November 2003 and began dating Maxwell the following year, remaining in a relationship with her until September 2010. Waitt...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Ted Waitt told the House Oversight Committee that he met Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein at a Hong Kong dinner in November 2003 and began dating Maxwell the following year, remaining in a relationship with her until September 2010. Waitt portrayed his own contact with Epstein as extremely limited, saying he had only a brief introduction at the dinner, one arranged meeting at Maxwell’s New York residence and two later chance encounters. He said he never communicated with Epstein by phone or email and had no business or financial relationship with him. Waitt testified that Maxwell described Epstein positively as a brilliant investor and money manager and told him that, after their romantic relationship ended, she continued working as an estate manager overseeing his properties and staff.<br /><br />Waitt said he wanted Maxwell to stop working for Epstein because Epstein was her former boyfriend, but claimed he had no knowledge at the time of their criminal conduct and never witnessed abuse, coercion or trafficking. He repeatedly said he could not confirm how much work Maxwell continued doing for Epstein while they dated, despite their seven-year relationship, and he denied knowing whether Epstein manipulated or abused her. Waitt also acknowledged that Maxwell had been around his four children, three of whom were girls, and said that had he known then what he knows now, he never would have befriended her or allowed her near them. His testimony largely presented him as someone who was intimately involved with Maxwell for years while remaining unaware of the reality of her relationship with Epstein and the crimes for which she was later convicted.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2026/05/Waitt-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GO120551</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>819</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Ted Waitt And The Transcript From His Epstein Related Trip To Congress (Part 4) (7/31/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/ted-waitt-and-the-transcript-from-his-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-4-7-31-26--73265888</link><description><![CDATA[Ted Waitt told the House Oversight Committee that he met Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein at a Hong Kong dinner in November 2003 and began dating Maxwell the following year, remaining in a relationship with her until September 2010. Waitt portrayed his own contact with Epstein as extremely limited, saying he had only a brief introduction at the dinner, one arranged meeting at Maxwell’s New York residence and two later chance encounters. He said he never communicated with Epstein by phone or email and had no business or financial relationship with him. Waitt testified that Maxwell described Epstein positively as a brilliant investor and money manager and told him that, after their romantic relationship ended, she continued working as an estate manager overseeing his properties and staff.<br /><br />Waitt said he wanted Maxwell to stop working for Epstein because Epstein was her former boyfriend, but claimed he had no knowledge at the time of their criminal conduct and never witnessed abuse, coercion or trafficking. He repeatedly said he could not confirm how much work Maxwell continued doing for Epstein while they dated, despite their seven-year relationship, and he denied knowing whether Epstein manipulated or abused her. Waitt also acknowledged that Maxwell had been around his four children, three of whom were girls, and said that had he known then what he knows now, he never would have befriended her or allowed her near them. His testimony largely presented him as someone who was intimately involved with Maxwell for years while remaining unaware of the reality of her relationship with Epstein and the crimes for which she was later convicted.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2026/05/Waitt-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GO120551</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73265888</guid><pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 18:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73265888/waitt4.mp3" length="11618891" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1896fd92-6014-4bcb-a8ee-ad50f0e910c2/1896fd92-6014-4bcb-a8ee-ad50f0e910c2.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1896fd92-6014-4bcb-a8ee-ad50f0e910c2/1896fd92-6014-4bcb-a8ee-ad50f0e910c2.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1896fd92-6014-4bcb-a8ee-ad50f0e910c2/1896fd92-6014-4bcb-a8ee-ad50f0e910c2.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Ted Waitt told the House Oversight Committee that he met Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein at a Hong Kong dinner in November 2003 and began dating Maxwell the following year, remaining in a relationship with her until September 2010. Waitt...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Ted Waitt told the House Oversight Committee that he met Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein at a Hong Kong dinner in November 2003 and began dating Maxwell the following year, remaining in a relationship with her until September 2010. Waitt portrayed his own contact with Epstein as extremely limited, saying he had only a brief introduction at the dinner, one arranged meeting at Maxwell’s New York residence and two later chance encounters. He said he never communicated with Epstein by phone or email and had no business or financial relationship with him. Waitt testified that Maxwell described Epstein positively as a brilliant investor and money manager and told him that, after their romantic relationship ended, she continued working as an estate manager overseeing his properties and staff.<br /><br />Waitt said he wanted Maxwell to stop working for Epstein because Epstein was her former boyfriend, but claimed he had no knowledge at the time of their criminal conduct and never witnessed abuse, coercion or trafficking. He repeatedly said he could not confirm how much work Maxwell continued doing for Epstein while they dated, despite their seven-year relationship, and he denied knowing whether Epstein manipulated or abused her. Waitt also acknowledged that Maxwell had been around his four children, three of whom were girls, and said that had he known then what he knows now, he never would have befriended her or allowed her near them. His testimony largely presented him as someone who was intimately involved with Maxwell for years while remaining unaware of the reality of her relationship with Epstein and the crimes for which she was later convicted.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2026/05/Waitt-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GO120551</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>727</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Ted Waitt And The Transcript From His Epstein Related Trip To Congress (Part 3) (7/31/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/ted-waitt-and-the-transcript-from-his-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-3-7-31-26--73265889</link><description><![CDATA[Ted Waitt told the House Oversight Committee that he met Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein at a Hong Kong dinner in November 2003 and began dating Maxwell the following year, remaining in a relationship with her until September 2010. Waitt portrayed his own contact with Epstein as extremely limited, saying he had only a brief introduction at the dinner, one arranged meeting at Maxwell’s New York residence and two later chance encounters. He said he never communicated with Epstein by phone or email and had no business or financial relationship with him. Waitt testified that Maxwell described Epstein positively as a brilliant investor and money manager and told him that, after their romantic relationship ended, she continued working as an estate manager overseeing his properties and staff.<br /><br />Waitt said he wanted Maxwell to stop working for Epstein because Epstein was her former boyfriend, but claimed he had no knowledge at the time of their criminal conduct and never witnessed abuse, coercion or trafficking. He repeatedly said he could not confirm how much work Maxwell continued doing for Epstein while they dated, despite their seven-year relationship, and he denied knowing whether Epstein manipulated or abused her. Waitt also acknowledged that Maxwell had been around his four children, three of whom were girls, and said that had he known then what he knows now, he never would have befriended her or allowed her near them. His testimony largely presented him as someone who was intimately involved with Maxwell for years while remaining unaware of the reality of her relationship with Epstein and the crimes for which she was later convicted.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2026/05/Waitt-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GO120551</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73265889</guid><pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73265889/waitt3.mp3" length="13543175" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/988e70d4-7f12-444f-a5c2-721a8f5a6541/988e70d4-7f12-444f-a5c2-721a8f5a6541.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/988e70d4-7f12-444f-a5c2-721a8f5a6541/988e70d4-7f12-444f-a5c2-721a8f5a6541.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/988e70d4-7f12-444f-a5c2-721a8f5a6541/988e70d4-7f12-444f-a5c2-721a8f5a6541.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Ted Waitt told the House Oversight Committee that he met Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein at a Hong Kong dinner in November 2003 and began dating Maxwell the following year, remaining in a relationship with her until September 2010. Waitt...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Ted Waitt told the House Oversight Committee that he met Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein at a Hong Kong dinner in November 2003 and began dating Maxwell the following year, remaining in a relationship with her until September 2010. Waitt portrayed his own contact with Epstein as extremely limited, saying he had only a brief introduction at the dinner, one arranged meeting at Maxwell’s New York residence and two later chance encounters. He said he never communicated with Epstein by phone or email and had no business or financial relationship with him. Waitt testified that Maxwell described Epstein positively as a brilliant investor and money manager and told him that, after their romantic relationship ended, she continued working as an estate manager overseeing his properties and staff.<br /><br />Waitt said he wanted Maxwell to stop working for Epstein because Epstein was her former boyfriend, but claimed he had no knowledge at the time of their criminal conduct and never witnessed abuse, coercion or trafficking. He repeatedly said he could not confirm how much work Maxwell continued doing for Epstein while they dated, despite their seven-year relationship, and he denied knowing whether Epstein manipulated or abused her. Waitt also acknowledged that Maxwell had been around his four children, three of whom were girls, and said that had he known then what he knows now, he never would have befriended her or allowed her near them. His testimony largely presented him as someone who was intimately involved with Maxwell for years while remaining unaware of the reality of her relationship with Epstein and the crimes for which she was later convicted.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2026/05/Waitt-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GO120551</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>847</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The Ghislaine Maxwell Trial, Juan Alessi And The Photo Albums (8/1/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-ghislaine-maxwell-trial-juan-alessi-and-the-photo-albums-8-1-26--73284798</link><description><![CDATA[During Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial, Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime Palm Beach house manager Juan Alessi testified that Maxwell kept multiple photo albums containing pictures of young girls — some topless — who frequented Epstein’s estate. He said Maxwell often used a high-end camera and was “constantly taking photographs,” many of which featured these girls by the pool or sunbathing without tops. Alessi told jurors that he came across these albums while cleaning the house and described them as being filled with “very young-looking girls.” He recalled that Maxwell appeared to enjoy showing the albums to guests, suggesting she took pride in her role managing Epstein’s social and private life.<br /><br />Alessi’s testimony painted Maxwell as an active participant in Epstein’s day-to-day operations, not merely an assistant. He said she controlled the staff with a 58-page household manual that dictated everything from staff behavior to how Epstein’s phone calls were to be handled. Prosecutors used his account of the photo albums to underscore the pervasive sexualization of minors within Epstein’s homes and to establish that Maxwell was not only aware of but contributed to creating an environment that enabled abuse. His statements about the albums became one of the most visually disturbing depictions of how normalized exploitation had become inside the Epstein household.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73284798</guid><pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73284798/megaalessiphotoalbums.mp3" length="28922819" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4b38ba20-7035-43c0-ab80-b9d8f590513a/4b38ba20-7035-43c0-ab80-b9d8f590513a.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4b38ba20-7035-43c0-ab80-b9d8f590513a/4b38ba20-7035-43c0-ab80-b9d8f590513a.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4b38ba20-7035-43c0-ab80-b9d8f590513a/4b38ba20-7035-43c0-ab80-b9d8f590513a.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>During Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial, Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime Palm Beach house manager Juan Alessi testified that Maxwell kept multiple photo albums containing pictures of young girls — some topless — who frequented Epstein’s estate. He said Maxwell...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[During Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial, Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime Palm Beach house manager Juan Alessi testified that Maxwell kept multiple photo albums containing pictures of young girls — some topless — who frequented Epstein’s estate. He said Maxwell often used a high-end camera and was “constantly taking photographs,” many of which featured these girls by the pool or sunbathing without tops. Alessi told jurors that he came across these albums while cleaning the house and described them as being filled with “very young-looking girls.” He recalled that Maxwell appeared to enjoy showing the albums to guests, suggesting she took pride in her role managing Epstein’s social and private life.<br /><br />Alessi’s testimony painted Maxwell as an active participant in Epstein’s day-to-day operations, not merely an assistant. He said she controlled the staff with a 58-page household manual that dictated everything from staff behavior to how Epstein’s phone calls were to be handled. Prosecutors used his account of the photo albums to underscore the pervasive sexualization of minors within Epstein’s homes and to establish that Maxwell was not only aware of but contributed to creating an environment that enabled abuse. His statements about the albums became one of the most visually disturbing depictions of how normalized exploitation had become inside the Epstein household.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1808</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   Judge Nathan And Her Management Of The Ghislaine Maxwell Trial Circus (8/1/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-judge-nathan-and-her-management-of-the-ghislaine-maxwell-trial-circus-8-1-26--73284724</link><description><![CDATA[Judge Alison Nathan was the federal judge who presided over Ghislaine Maxwell’s criminal case in the Southern District of New York. Before joining the federal bench, Nathan worked in private practice, served in the Obama administration, and was nominated to the district court in 2011; she was later elevated to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, but continued handling Maxwell’s case by designation. In Maxwell’s case, Nathan oversaw the arraignment, detention fight, discovery schedule, pretrial motions, jury selection, trial, verdict, and sentencing. DOJ records show that Maxwell was ordered detained before trial and that Nathan set the early schedule for discovery, motions, and trial proceedings.<br /><br />Nathan managed the Maxwell trial in a controlled, no-nonsense way, keeping the proceedings moving while handling an avalanche of high-profile issues: secrecy disputes, witness privacy, evidence about Epstein, media attention, juror questions, and repeated defense efforts to narrow or challenge the case. The trial lasted about four and a half weeks, and Maxwell was convicted in December 2021 of helping Epstein recruit and groom underage girls for sexual abuse. Nathan later sentenced Maxwell to 20 years in prison and a $750,000 fine, telling the court that the sentence reflected Maxwell’s role in enabling Epstein’s abuse while also rejecting the idea that Maxwell was being punished for Epstein’s crimes alone.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73284724</guid><pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 12:39:29 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73284724/meganathanunsealnames.mp3" length="47223162" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c21db3b7-1fa7-47fb-9f11-5044e794c2d1/c21db3b7-1fa7-47fb-9f11-5044e794c2d1.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c21db3b7-1fa7-47fb-9f11-5044e794c2d1/c21db3b7-1fa7-47fb-9f11-5044e794c2d1.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c21db3b7-1fa7-47fb-9f11-5044e794c2d1/c21db3b7-1fa7-47fb-9f11-5044e794c2d1.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Judge Alison Nathan was the federal judge who presided over Ghislaine Maxwell’s criminal case in the Southern District of New York. Before joining the federal bench, Nathan worked in private practice, served in the Obama administration, and was...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Judge Alison Nathan was the federal judge who presided over Ghislaine Maxwell’s criminal case in the Southern District of New York. Before joining the federal bench, Nathan worked in private practice, served in the Obama administration, and was nominated to the district court in 2011; she was later elevated to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, but continued handling Maxwell’s case by designation. In Maxwell’s case, Nathan oversaw the arraignment, detention fight, discovery schedule, pretrial motions, jury selection, trial, verdict, and sentencing. DOJ records show that Maxwell was ordered detained before trial and that Nathan set the early schedule for discovery, motions, and trial proceedings.<br /><br />Nathan managed the Maxwell trial in a controlled, no-nonsense way, keeping the proceedings moving while handling an avalanche of high-profile issues: secrecy disputes, witness privacy, evidence about Epstein, media attention, juror questions, and repeated defense efforts to narrow or challenge the case. The trial lasted about four and a half weeks, and Maxwell was convicted in December 2021 of helping Epstein recruit and groom underage girls for sexual abuse. Nathan later sentenced Maxwell to 20 years in prison and a $750,000 fine, telling the court that the sentence reflected Maxwell’s role in enabling Epstein’s abuse while also rejecting the idea that Maxwell was being punished for Epstein’s crimes alone.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2952</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Julie K. Brown And Defamation Lawsuits (8/1/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-julie-k-brown-and-defamation-lawsuits-8-1-26--73284776</link><description><![CDATA[Two fronts opened against Miami Herald reporter Julie K. Brown over her Epstein reporting and book. First, multiple defamation suits were filed by people portrayed in her work: Epstein survivors Courtney Wild and Haley Robson alleged Brown misrepresented their experiences and, in Robson’s case, cast her as a collaborator rather than a victim; and Ghislaine Maxwell’s former assistant Emmy Tayler filed her own defamation action over claims that she “organized” Epstein’s massages. The Tayler matter proved especially damaging to Brown’s publisher: HarperCollins issued a formal apology in 2024 acknowledging Tayler was defamed in the UK edition and wrongly inserted into the narrative—an extraordinary concession that undercut the book’s editorial due diligence and handed ammunition to critics who said Brown’s project sometimes sacrificed precision for impact.<br /><br />Second, Brown became embroiled in a contractual fight with private investigator Michael (Mike) Fisten, who said he’d been cut out of a promised collaboration and sued for compensation tied to the book deal. That dispute showcased the commercial tug-of-war behind high-profile “accountability” bestsellers: Fisten’s early winless turn in arbitration (rejecting his $350k claim) didn’t end the saga, which spilled into Miami-Dade court and later reached Florida’s Third District Court of Appeal. The upshot is a messy, credibility-draining litigation trail: while Brown’s reporting helped reignite scrutiny of Epstein, the courtroom aftermath—defamation claims from survivors, a publisher’s apology to Tayler, and a protracted fight with a key investigator—has raised uncomfortable questions about methods, attribution, and whether the rush to own the narrative came at the expense of accuracy and fair dealing.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73284776</guid><pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 10:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73284776/megajulieksuedbyemmytaylorprivateeinvestigator.mp3" length="30249839" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/47faf167-5a0d-4a8d-88b1-c4728dc4e3e6/47faf167-5a0d-4a8d-88b1-c4728dc4e3e6.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/47faf167-5a0d-4a8d-88b1-c4728dc4e3e6/47faf167-5a0d-4a8d-88b1-c4728dc4e3e6.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/47faf167-5a0d-4a8d-88b1-c4728dc4e3e6/47faf167-5a0d-4a8d-88b1-c4728dc4e3e6.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Two fronts opened against Miami Herald reporter Julie K. Brown over her Epstein reporting and book. First, multiple defamation suits were filed by people portrayed in her work: Epstein survivors Courtney Wild and Haley Robson alleged Brown...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Two fronts opened against Miami Herald reporter Julie K. Brown over her Epstein reporting and book. First, multiple defamation suits were filed by people portrayed in her work: Epstein survivors Courtney Wild and Haley Robson alleged Brown misrepresented their experiences and, in Robson’s case, cast her as a collaborator rather than a victim; and Ghislaine Maxwell’s former assistant Emmy Tayler filed her own defamation action over claims that she “organized” Epstein’s massages. The Tayler matter proved especially damaging to Brown’s publisher: HarperCollins issued a formal apology in 2024 acknowledging Tayler was defamed in the UK edition and wrongly inserted into the narrative—an extraordinary concession that undercut the book’s editorial due diligence and handed ammunition to critics who said Brown’s project sometimes sacrificed precision for impact.<br /><br />Second, Brown became embroiled in a contractual fight with private investigator Michael (Mike) Fisten, who said he’d been cut out of a promised collaboration and sued for compensation tied to the book deal. That dispute showcased the commercial tug-of-war behind high-profile “accountability” bestsellers: Fisten’s early winless turn in arbitration (rejecting his $350k claim) didn’t end the saga, which spilled into Miami-Dade court and later reached Florida’s Third District Court of Appeal. The upshot is a messy, credibility-draining litigation trail: while Brown’s reporting helped reignite scrutiny of Epstein, the courtroom aftermath—defamation claims from survivors, a publisher’s apology to Tayler, and a protracted fight with a key investigator—has raised uncomfortable questions about methods, attribution, and whether the rush to own the narrative came at the expense of accuracy and fair dealing.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1891</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega  Edition:   Scott Borgerson Ditches Ghislaine For A Yoga Instructor (8/1/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-scott-borgerson-ditches-ghislaine-for-a-yoga-instructor-8-1-26--73284671</link><description><![CDATA[Their relationship, however, unraveled spectacularly once Maxwell was arrested in 2020. Borgerson reportedly ended the relationship over a phone call while she was incarcerated, later distancing himself from her legal battles and avoiding the media spotlight. Friends told reporters that Borgerson felt deceived by Maxwell, claiming she had drawn him into a scandal he neither anticipated nor could control. By the time Maxwell was convicted in 2021, Borgerson had largely vanished from public view, having resigned from CargoMetrics and relocated to focus on rebuilding his life. The relationship that once symbolized refuge and reinvention for Maxwell ultimately collapsed under the same weight of deception and disgrace that destroyed her wider social circle.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73284671</guid><pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73284671/megaborgersondumpsmaxwellyoga.mp3" length="33531237" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b1b77691-6f53-4ea2-8f05-36b29881d922/b1b77691-6f53-4ea2-8f05-36b29881d922.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b1b77691-6f53-4ea2-8f05-36b29881d922/b1b77691-6f53-4ea2-8f05-36b29881d922.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b1b77691-6f53-4ea2-8f05-36b29881d922/b1b77691-6f53-4ea2-8f05-36b29881d922.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Their relationship, however, unraveled spectacularly once Maxwell was arrested in 2020. Borgerson reportedly ended the relationship over a phone call while she was incarcerated, later distancing himself from her legal battles and avoiding the media...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Their relationship, however, unraveled spectacularly once Maxwell was arrested in 2020. Borgerson reportedly ended the relationship over a phone call while she was incarcerated, later distancing himself from her legal battles and avoiding the media spotlight. Friends told reporters that Borgerson felt deceived by Maxwell, claiming she had drawn him into a scandal he neither anticipated nor could control. By the time Maxwell was convicted in 2021, Borgerson had largely vanished from public view, having resigned from CargoMetrics and relocated to focus on rebuilding his life. The relationship that once symbolized refuge and reinvention for Maxwell ultimately collapsed under the same weight of deception and disgrace that destroyed her wider social circle.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2096</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Ghislaine Maxwell And Her Husband Scott Borgerson (7/31/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-ghislaine-maxwell-and-her-husband-scott-borgerson-7-31-26--73284670</link><description><![CDATA[Ghislaine Maxwell’s relationship with Scott Borgerson, a wealthy tech entrepreneur and former CEO of the maritime analytics firm CargoMetrics, began around 2013 and quickly evolved into a secretive, high-profile partnership. Reports indicate that the two were romantically involved and may have quietly married in 2016, a claim supported by Maxwell’s legal filings referencing a “spouse” who offered financial backing for her bail. Borgerson, who had previously presented himself as a clean-cut environmentalist and business leader, was said to have been deeply enamored with Maxwell, even allowing her to live in his New England mansion after she withdrew from public life following Jeffrey Epstein’s arrest. During her pretrial detention, prosecutors identified Borgerson as her partner and alleged that he helped manage some of her finances through trusts and property transfers—moves they argued were meant to obscure her wealth.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73284670</guid><pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73284670/megamaxwellborgersonrelationship.mp3" length="35934532" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5c2092e3-9ca3-42d3-b432-a93b1f91100a/5c2092e3-9ca3-42d3-b432-a93b1f91100a.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5c2092e3-9ca3-42d3-b432-a93b1f91100a/5c2092e3-9ca3-42d3-b432-a93b1f91100a.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5c2092e3-9ca3-42d3-b432-a93b1f91100a/5c2092e3-9ca3-42d3-b432-a93b1f91100a.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Ghislaine Maxwell’s relationship with Scott Borgerson, a wealthy tech entrepreneur and former CEO of the maritime analytics firm CargoMetrics, began around 2013 and quickly evolved into a secretive, high-profile partnership. Reports indicate that the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Ghislaine Maxwell’s relationship with Scott Borgerson, a wealthy tech entrepreneur and former CEO of the maritime analytics firm CargoMetrics, began around 2013 and quickly evolved into a secretive, high-profile partnership. Reports indicate that the two were romantically involved and may have quietly married in 2016, a claim supported by Maxwell’s legal filings referencing a “spouse” who offered financial backing for her bail. Borgerson, who had previously presented himself as a clean-cut environmentalist and business leader, was said to have been deeply enamored with Maxwell, even allowing her to live in his New England mansion after she withdrew from public life following Jeffrey Epstein’s arrest. During her pretrial detention, prosecutors identified Borgerson as her partner and alleged that he helped manage some of her finances through trusts and property transfers—moves they argued were meant to obscure her wealth.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2246</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Murder In Moscow:  Transcripts From The Closed IGG Hearing (Part 8)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-transcripts-from-the-closed-igg-hearing-part-8--73220544</link><description><![CDATA[On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), which they argued violated Kohberger's Fourth Amendment rights. Detective Brett Payne testified that the IGG lead was treated as a tip, with further independent investigation conducted to substantiate its validity. Defense expert Dr. Leah Larkin suggested potential violations of FBI policy and genealogy database terms of service during the IGG process. However, Judge Hippler expressed skepticism regarding the defense's claims, noting the lack of a reasonable expectation of privacy for DNA left at a crime scene.<br /><br />Following the hearing, Judge Hippler ordered the release of a redacted transcript, balancing public interest with privacy concerns. Redactions included the names of surviving roommates and distant relatives identified through IGG. The unsealed portions provide insight into the investigative methods used and the defense's challenges to the evidence's admissibility. This development underscores the ongoing legal debates surrounding the use of IGG in criminal investigations and its implications for privacy and constitutional rights.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/022125-Transcript-Redacted-hearing-held-Jan23-2025.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">KB-25-01-23-Hearing-Redacted.ecl</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73220544</guid><pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73220544/iggtranscripts8.mp3" length="13326672" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/bb6a2f8e-b3a9-4fff-8c60-05c9bb4eae3d/bb6a2f8e-b3a9-4fff-8c60-05c9bb4eae3d.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/bb6a2f8e-b3a9-4fff-8c60-05c9bb4eae3d/bb6a2f8e-b3a9-4fff-8c60-05c9bb4eae3d.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/bb6a2f8e-b3a9-4fff-8c60-05c9bb4eae3d/bb6a2f8e-b3a9-4fff-8c60-05c9bb4eae3d.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG),...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), which they argued violated Kohberger's Fourth Amendment rights. Detective Brett Payne testified that the IGG lead was treated as a tip, with further independent investigation conducted to substantiate its validity. Defense expert Dr. Leah Larkin suggested potential violations of FBI policy and genealogy database terms of service during the IGG process. However, Judge Hippler expressed skepticism regarding the defense's claims, noting the lack of a reasonable expectation of privacy for DNA left at a crime scene.<br /><br />Following the hearing, Judge Hippler ordered the release of a redacted transcript, balancing public interest with privacy concerns. Redactions included the names of surviving roommates and distant relatives identified through IGG. The unsealed portions provide insight into the investigative methods used and the defense's challenges to the evidence's admissibility. This development underscores the ongoing legal debates surrounding the use of IGG in criminal investigations and its implications for privacy and constitutional rights.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/022125-Transcript-Redacted-hearing-held-Jan23-2025.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">KB-25-01-23-Hearing-Redacted.ecl</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>833</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Murder In Moscow:  Transcripts From The Closed IGG Hearing (Part 7)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-transcripts-from-the-closed-igg-hearing-part-7--73220541</link><description><![CDATA[On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), which they argued violated Kohberger's Fourth Amendment rights. Detective Brett Payne testified that the IGG lead was treated as a tip, with further independent investigation conducted to substantiate its validity. Defense expert Dr. Leah Larkin suggested potential violations of FBI policy and genealogy database terms of service during the IGG process. However, Judge Hippler expressed skepticism regarding the defense's claims, noting the lack of a reasonable expectation of privacy for DNA left at a crime scene.<br /><br />Following the hearing, Judge Hippler ordered the release of a redacted transcript, balancing public interest with privacy concerns. Redactions included the names of surviving roommates and distant relatives identified through IGG. The unsealed portions provide insight into the investigative methods used and the defense's challenges to the evidence's admissibility. This development underscores the ongoing legal debates surrounding the use of IGG in criminal investigations and its implications for privacy and constitutional rights.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/022125-Transcript-Redacted-hearing-held-Jan23-2025.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">KB-25-01-23-Hearing-Redacted.ecl</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73220541</guid><pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73220541/iggtranscripts7.mp3" length="13917666" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/74a5657d-8ebd-4c21-ac96-ada3e5ef09b6/74a5657d-8ebd-4c21-ac96-ada3e5ef09b6.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/74a5657d-8ebd-4c21-ac96-ada3e5ef09b6/74a5657d-8ebd-4c21-ac96-ada3e5ef09b6.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/74a5657d-8ebd-4c21-ac96-ada3e5ef09b6/74a5657d-8ebd-4c21-ac96-ada3e5ef09b6.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG),...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), which they argued violated Kohberger's Fourth Amendment rights. Detective Brett Payne testified that the IGG lead was treated as a tip, with further independent investigation conducted to substantiate its validity. Defense expert Dr. Leah Larkin suggested potential violations of FBI policy and genealogy database terms of service during the IGG process. However, Judge Hippler expressed skepticism regarding the defense's claims, noting the lack of a reasonable expectation of privacy for DNA left at a crime scene.<br /><br />Following the hearing, Judge Hippler ordered the release of a redacted transcript, balancing public interest with privacy concerns. Redactions included the names of surviving roommates and distant relatives identified through IGG. The unsealed portions provide insight into the investigative methods used and the defense's challenges to the evidence's admissibility. This development underscores the ongoing legal debates surrounding the use of IGG in criminal investigations and its implications for privacy and constitutional rights.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/022125-Transcript-Redacted-hearing-held-Jan23-2025.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">KB-25-01-23-Hearing-Redacted.ecl</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>870</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Murder In Moscow:  Transcripts From The Closed IGG Hearing (Part 6)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-transcripts-from-the-closed-igg-hearing-part-6--73220540</link><description><![CDATA[On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), which they argued violated Kohberger's Fourth Amendment rights. Detective Brett Payne testified that the IGG lead was treated as a tip, with further independent investigation conducted to substantiate its validity. Defense expert Dr. Leah Larkin suggested potential violations of FBI policy and genealogy database terms of service during the IGG process. However, Judge Hippler expressed skepticism regarding the defense's claims, noting the lack of a reasonable expectation of privacy for DNA left at a crime scene.<br /><br />Following the hearing, Judge Hippler ordered the release of a redacted transcript, balancing public interest with privacy concerns. Redactions included the names of surviving roommates and distant relatives identified through IGG. The unsealed portions provide insight into the investigative methods used and the defense's challenges to the evidence's admissibility. This development underscores the ongoing legal debates surrounding the use of IGG in criminal investigations and its implications for privacy and constitutional rights.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/022125-Transcript-Redacted-hearing-held-Jan23-2025.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">KB-25-01-23-Hearing-Redacted.ecl</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73220540</guid><pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73220540/iggtranscripts6.mp3" length="11514819" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f2ad42b9-4260-4dbd-b1fa-b1f5a5cffa89/f2ad42b9-4260-4dbd-b1fa-b1f5a5cffa89.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f2ad42b9-4260-4dbd-b1fa-b1f5a5cffa89/f2ad42b9-4260-4dbd-b1fa-b1f5a5cffa89.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f2ad42b9-4260-4dbd-b1fa-b1f5a5cffa89/f2ad42b9-4260-4dbd-b1fa-b1f5a5cffa89.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG),...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), which they argued violated Kohberger's Fourth Amendment rights. Detective Brett Payne testified that the IGG lead was treated as a tip, with further independent investigation conducted to substantiate its validity. Defense expert Dr. Leah Larkin suggested potential violations of FBI policy and genealogy database terms of service during the IGG process. However, Judge Hippler expressed skepticism regarding the defense's claims, noting the lack of a reasonable expectation of privacy for DNA left at a crime scene.<br /><br />Following the hearing, Judge Hippler ordered the release of a redacted transcript, balancing public interest with privacy concerns. Redactions included the names of surviving roommates and distant relatives identified through IGG. The unsealed portions provide insight into the investigative methods used and the defense's challenges to the evidence's admissibility. This development underscores the ongoing legal debates surrounding the use of IGG in criminal investigations and its implications for privacy and constitutional rights.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/022125-Transcript-Redacted-hearing-held-Jan23-2025.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">KB-25-01-23-Hearing-Redacted.ecl</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>720</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Transcripts From The Hearing Dealing With Tyler Robinson’s Courtroom Appearance (Part 6) (7/31/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/transcripts-from-the-hearing-dealing-with-tyler-robinson-s-courtroom-appearance-part-6-7-31-26--73247878</link><description><![CDATA[The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson’s request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.<br /><br />Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff’s office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk’s shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff’s office’s filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Monday<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2025/12/tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73247878</guid><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 22:30:01 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73247878/robinsonhearingtranscript6.mp3" length="13650591" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/bfea5a78-4eb2-4a6d-960a-ff0197c538c4/bfea5a78-4eb2-4a6d-960a-ff0197c538c4.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/bfea5a78-4eb2-4a6d-960a-ff0197c538c4/bfea5a78-4eb2-4a6d-960a-ff0197c538c4.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/bfea5a78-4eb2-4a6d-960a-ff0197c538c4/bfea5a78-4eb2-4a6d-960a-ff0197c538c4.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson’s request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson’s request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.<br /><br />Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff’s office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk’s shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff’s office’s filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Monday<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2025/12/tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>854</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvu</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Kathy Ruemmler Transcript and Her Attack on Virginia Roberts (7/31/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-kathy-ruemmler-transcript-and-her-attack-on-virginia-roberts-7-31-26--73265925</link><description><![CDATA[Kathy Ruemmler, the former Obama White House counsel and longtime Goldman Sachs legal executive, faced renewed scrutiny after the House Oversight Committee released the transcript of her July 15 interview about her relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Ruemmler acknowledged that associating with Epstein was a mistake, but drew outrage when she said some allegations made by Virginia Giuffre “lacked inherent credibility.” Asked directly whether Giuffre had been victimized by Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, Ruemmler said she did not know, although she added that she had no reason to doubt Giuffre’s claim that she had been abused. Ruemmler argued that certain allegations involving numerous world leaders struck her, based on her experience as a prosecutor and defense attorney, as insufficiently specific or substantiated<br /><br />Investigators also questioned Ruemmler about a 2015 email in which she told Epstein she wanted to consider whether counterclaims could be brought against Giuffre, who was then suing Maxwell for defamation. Ruemmler claimed she did not remember the message and characterized it as a generic attempt to appear responsive to Epstein rather than evidence that she was actively working against Giuffre. Giuffre’s family fiercely rejected Ruemmler’s testimony, accusing her of attacking the credibility of a survivor while attempting to minimize her own relationship with Epstein. Ruemmler’s representative countered that she had expressed skepticism about only certain allegations, not dismissed Giuffre’s entire account of abuse.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.cnn.com/2026/07/29/politics/kathy-ruemmler-epstein" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein accuser’s family blasts former Obama White House lawyer who said her assertions ‘lacked inherent credibility’ | CNN Politics</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73265925</guid><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73265925/ruemmlerattacksvirginia.mp3" length="17497487" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a761a458-8b8b-43c2-a918-8f609bfee393/a761a458-8b8b-43c2-a918-8f609bfee393.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a761a458-8b8b-43c2-a918-8f609bfee393/a761a458-8b8b-43c2-a918-8f609bfee393.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a761a458-8b8b-43c2-a918-8f609bfee393/a761a458-8b8b-43c2-a918-8f609bfee393.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Kathy Ruemmler, the former Obama White House counsel and longtime Goldman Sachs legal executive, faced renewed scrutiny after the House Oversight Committee released the transcript of her July 15 interview about her relationship with Jeffrey Epstein....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Kathy Ruemmler, the former Obama White House counsel and longtime Goldman Sachs legal executive, faced renewed scrutiny after the House Oversight Committee released the transcript of her July 15 interview about her relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Ruemmler acknowledged that associating with Epstein was a mistake, but drew outrage when she said some allegations made by Virginia Giuffre “lacked inherent credibility.” Asked directly whether Giuffre had been victimized by Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, Ruemmler said she did not know, although she added that she had no reason to doubt Giuffre’s claim that she had been abused. Ruemmler argued that certain allegations involving numerous world leaders struck her, based on her experience as a prosecutor and defense attorney, as insufficiently specific or substantiated<br /><br />Investigators also questioned Ruemmler about a 2015 email in which she told Epstein she wanted to consider whether counterclaims could be brought against Giuffre, who was then suing Maxwell for defamation. Ruemmler claimed she did not remember the message and characterized it as a generic attempt to appear responsive to Epstein rather than evidence that she was actively working against Giuffre. Giuffre’s family fiercely rejected Ruemmler’s testimony, accusing her of attacking the credibility of a survivor while attempting to minimize her own relationship with Epstein. Ruemmler’s representative countered that she had expressed skepticism about only certain allegations, not dismissed Giuffre’s entire account of abuse.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.cnn.com/2026/07/29/politics/kathy-ruemmler-epstein" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein accuser’s family blasts former Obama White House lawyer who said her assertions ‘lacked inherent credibility’ | CNN Politics</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1094</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The United States Senate Rejects the Idea of a Maxwell Pardon (7/31/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-united-states-senate-rejects-the-idea-of-a-maxwell-pardon-7-31-26--73265924</link><description><![CDATA[The Senate unanimously adopted a nonbinding resolution opposing any presidential pardon, commutation or other form of clemency for Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime associate who is serving a 20-year federal sentence following her 2021 conviction on sex-trafficking-related charges. Introduced by Democratic Sen. Jacky Rosen of Nevada, the measure passed by unanimous consent without objection, signaling that senators from both parties wanted to publicly distance themselves from any attempt to reduce Maxwell’s punishment. Rosen argued that even entertaining clemency for a convicted sex trafficker was unacceptable and pressed Republicans to make their position clear.<br /><br />Although the resolution cannot legally prevent a president from pardoning Maxwell, it increased the political pressure surrounding the issue after President Trump repeatedly declined to categorically rule clemency in or out. White House officials maintained that a pardon was not under consideration, while Todd Blanche, who previously interviewed Maxwell and supervised the release of Epstein-related records, said he would not recommend one. Maxwell recently invoked the Fifth Amendment during a House Oversight Committee deposition, and her attorney claimed she remained willing to offer testimony defending Trump and former President Bill Clinton against allegations of wrongdoing connected to Epstein.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://nypost.com/2026/07/29/us-news/senate-unanimously-agrees-to-oppose-pardon-for-ghislaine-maxwell/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Senate unanimously agrees to oppose pardon for Ghislaine Maxwell</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73265924</guid><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 18:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73265924/senatemaxwellpardon.mp3" length="9957085" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/aa6f6636-e69d-4e3e-aa55-9cec3def4b81/aa6f6636-e69d-4e3e-aa55-9cec3def4b81.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/aa6f6636-e69d-4e3e-aa55-9cec3def4b81/aa6f6636-e69d-4e3e-aa55-9cec3def4b81.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/aa6f6636-e69d-4e3e-aa55-9cec3def4b81/aa6f6636-e69d-4e3e-aa55-9cec3def4b81.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Senate unanimously adopted a nonbinding resolution opposing any presidential pardon, commutation or other form of clemency for Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime associate who is serving a 20-year federal sentence following her 2021...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Senate unanimously adopted a nonbinding resolution opposing any presidential pardon, commutation or other form of clemency for Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime associate who is serving a 20-year federal sentence following her 2021 conviction on sex-trafficking-related charges. Introduced by Democratic Sen. Jacky Rosen of Nevada, the measure passed by unanimous consent without objection, signaling that senators from both parties wanted to publicly distance themselves from any attempt to reduce Maxwell’s punishment. Rosen argued that even entertaining clemency for a convicted sex trafficker was unacceptable and pressed Republicans to make their position clear.<br /><br />Although the resolution cannot legally prevent a president from pardoning Maxwell, it increased the political pressure surrounding the issue after President Trump repeatedly declined to categorically rule clemency in or out. White House officials maintained that a pardon was not under consideration, while Todd Blanche, who previously interviewed Maxwell and supervised the release of Epstein-related records, said he would not recommend one. Maxwell recently invoked the Fifth Amendment during a House Oversight Committee deposition, and her attorney claimed she remained willing to offer testimony defending Trump and former President Bill Clinton against allegations of wrongdoing connected to Epstein.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://nypost.com/2026/07/29/us-news/senate-unanimously-agrees-to-oppose-pardon-for-ghislaine-maxwell/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Senate unanimously agrees to oppose pardon for Ghislaine Maxwell</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>623</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Murder In Moscow:  What Drove Bryan Kohberger Into the King Road Home? (7/31/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-what-drove-bryan-kohberger-into-the-king-road-home-7-31-26--73284311</link><description><![CDATA[Bryan Kohberger has never publicly explained why he murdered University of Idaho students Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. By pleading guilty in July 2025, he avoided both the death penalty and a trial that might have exposed more evidence about his motive. Prosecutors said they found no proof of a sexual assault or a direct relationship between Kohberger and the victims, although his phone had connected to a cellular tower serving the area near their Moscow home several times before the killings. Kaylee’s father, Steve Goncalves, disputed the prosecution’s rejection of a sexual motive, claiming investigators had described disturbing material allegedly found on Kohberger’s phone, but those claims have not been publicly verified.<br /><br />Experts have instead tried to infer motive from the attack itself. Forensic pathologist Mary Jumbelic said the extensive injuries inflicted on the three women appeared to show “overkill,” which can suggest rage, domination or a deeply personal psychological impulse, while the male victim was allegedly attacked differently. Digital investigators also said Kohberger’s sparse online activity suggested he may have deliberately concealed his planning and interests. Ultimately, authorities said they found no definitive explanation for why he selected the house or its occupants, and Kohberger declined to speak at sentencing. His attempt to withdraw his guilty plea could potentially produce additional evidence if the case ever returned to court, but a former federal prosecutor interviewed by People predicted that his petition would be denied.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://people.com/bryan-kohberger-motive-expert-and-lawyer-opinions-12029609" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Here’s What Experts and Lawyers Have Said About Bryan Kohberger’s Motive</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73284311</guid><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73284311/whatwaskohbergersmotive.mp3" length="15067472" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/75759330-3e38-49ea-b118-271c52e1be29/75759330-3e38-49ea-b118-271c52e1be29.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/75759330-3e38-49ea-b118-271c52e1be29/75759330-3e38-49ea-b118-271c52e1be29.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/75759330-3e38-49ea-b118-271c52e1be29/75759330-3e38-49ea-b118-271c52e1be29.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Bryan Kohberger has never publicly explained why he murdered University of Idaho students Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. By pleading guilty in July 2025, he avoided both the death penalty and a trial that might have...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Bryan Kohberger has never publicly explained why he murdered University of Idaho students Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. By pleading guilty in July 2025, he avoided both the death penalty and a trial that might have exposed more evidence about his motive. Prosecutors said they found no proof of a sexual assault or a direct relationship between Kohberger and the victims, although his phone had connected to a cellular tower serving the area near their Moscow home several times before the killings. Kaylee’s father, Steve Goncalves, disputed the prosecution’s rejection of a sexual motive, claiming investigators had described disturbing material allegedly found on Kohberger’s phone, but those claims have not been publicly verified.<br /><br />Experts have instead tried to infer motive from the attack itself. Forensic pathologist Mary Jumbelic said the extensive injuries inflicted on the three women appeared to show “overkill,” which can suggest rage, domination or a deeply personal psychological impulse, while the male victim was allegedly attacked differently. Digital investigators also said Kohberger’s sparse online activity suggested he may have deliberately concealed his planning and interests. Ultimately, authorities said they found no definitive explanation for why he selected the house or its occupants, and Kohberger declined to speak at sentencing. His attempt to withdraw his guilty plea could potentially produce additional evidence if the case ever returned to court, but a former federal prosecutor interviewed by People predicted that his petition would be denied.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://people.com/bryan-kohberger-motive-expert-and-lawyer-opinions-12029609" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Here’s What Experts and Lawyers Have Said About Bryan Kohberger’s Motive</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>942</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Jes Staley Contradicts Jamie Dimon’s Epstein Testimony (7/31/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/jes-staley-contradicts-jamie-dimon-s-epstein-testimony-7-31-26--73261243</link><description><![CDATA[Jes Staley told Congress that he warned JPMorgan chief executive Jamie Dimon about Jeffrey Epstein’s legal troubles in both 2006 and 2008, directly contradicting Dimon’s sworn claim that he did not learn Epstein was a bank client until 2019. Staley said the two men discussed the investigations into Epstein and his continued relationship with JPMorgan, placing Dimon much closer to the bank’s handling of the disgraced financier than Dimon has acknowledged. JPMorgan denied that the conversations occurred, leaving Congress with two irreconcilable accounts from former senior executives and raising the question of which man gave false or misleading testimony.<br /><br />Staley’s credibility was also under heavy scrutiny because of the extensive evidence showing how close he was to Epstein. The two exchanged more than 1,200 emails, Staley visited Epstein’s properties and regulators concluded that he had misrepresented their relationship, leading to a £1.1 million fine and a ban from Britain’s financial industry. Staley continued to deny wrongdoing, but lawmakers challenged his attempts to portray Epstein as merely a professional contact. JPMorgan has paid roughly $375 million to settle Epstein-related claims and previously accused Staley of concealing information, meaning the dispute between Staley and Dimon now goes to the heart of what the bank’s senior leadership knew, when it knew it and why Epstein remained a client for years after his criminal conduct became public.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.thetimes.com/us/news-today/article/jes-staley-jamie-dimon-jeffrey-epstein-pz5s7ct07" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jes Staley v Jamie Dimon: who’s telling the truth about Epstein warnings?</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73261243</guid><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73261243/staleyaccusesdiamondepsteinrelationship.mp3" length="11082649" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c9aa974b-66d5-4cb9-a107-5d127b4b0dc5/c9aa974b-66d5-4cb9-a107-5d127b4b0dc5.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c9aa974b-66d5-4cb9-a107-5d127b4b0dc5/c9aa974b-66d5-4cb9-a107-5d127b4b0dc5.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c9aa974b-66d5-4cb9-a107-5d127b4b0dc5/c9aa974b-66d5-4cb9-a107-5d127b4b0dc5.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jes Staley told Congress that he warned JPMorgan chief executive Jamie Dimon about Jeffrey Epstein’s legal troubles in both 2006 and 2008, directly contradicting Dimon’s sworn claim that he did not learn Epstein was a bank client until 2019. Staley...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jes Staley told Congress that he warned JPMorgan chief executive Jamie Dimon about Jeffrey Epstein’s legal troubles in both 2006 and 2008, directly contradicting Dimon’s sworn claim that he did not learn Epstein was a bank client until 2019. Staley said the two men discussed the investigations into Epstein and his continued relationship with JPMorgan, placing Dimon much closer to the bank’s handling of the disgraced financier than Dimon has acknowledged. JPMorgan denied that the conversations occurred, leaving Congress with two irreconcilable accounts from former senior executives and raising the question of which man gave false or misleading testimony.<br /><br />Staley’s credibility was also under heavy scrutiny because of the extensive evidence showing how close he was to Epstein. The two exchanged more than 1,200 emails, Staley visited Epstein’s properties and regulators concluded that he had misrepresented their relationship, leading to a £1.1 million fine and a ban from Britain’s financial industry. Staley continued to deny wrongdoing, but lawmakers challenged his attempts to portray Epstein as merely a professional contact. JPMorgan has paid roughly $375 million to settle Epstein-related claims and previously accused Staley of concealing information, meaning the dispute between Staley and Dimon now goes to the heart of what the bank’s senior leadership knew, when it knew it and why Epstein remained a client for years after his criminal conduct became public.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.thetimes.com/us/news-today/article/jes-staley-jamie-dimon-jeffrey-epstein-pz5s7ct07" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jes Staley v Jamie Dimon: who’s telling the truth about Epstein warnings?</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>693</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Larry Summers, Jeffrey Epstein and the Middle East Briefing (7/31/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/larry-summers-jeffrey-epstein-and-the-middle-east-briefing-7-31-26--73266005</link><description><![CDATA[A two-page Middle East policy briefing bearing former Treasury secretary Larry Summers’s name was found among the Jeffrey Epstein documents released through the House Oversight Committee. Dated to early 2013, the briefing summarized political and security developments across ten countries during the upheaval of the Arab Spring, including Egypt, Syria, Israel, Iran, Libya, Tunisia and Saudi Arabia. Its contents ranged from political assassinations and civil unrest to Iranian nuclear negotiations, Israeli military activity and regional diplomatic maneuvering. The sophistication and breadth of the analysis suggested it was prepared for a senior policymaker or someone with access to high-level foreign-policy reporting.<br /><br />The document adds another dimension to the long-running relationship between Summers and Epstein, showing that material connected to Summers and involving sensitive international affairs ended up in Epstein’s possession. However, the document alone does not establish whether Summers personally wrote it for Epstein, forwarded it to him or whether Epstein obtained it through someone else. Combined with later emails showing Summers seeking personal advice from Epstein and testimony that Summers introduced Bill Clinton to him, the briefing illustrates the extraordinary level of intellectual, political and institutional access Epstein cultivated. What Epstein intended to do with the information remains unknown, but its presence in his files raises further questions about why powerful officials continued providing him with privileged access long after his criminal conduct had become public.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://easternherald.com/2026/07/29/larry-summers-middle-east-briefing-epstein-files-house-oversight/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Larry Summers' 2013 Middle East Briefing in the Epstein Files</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73266005</guid><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73266005/epsteinsummersintelemail.mp3" length="12028073" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b955f1ca-a200-40b8-8e9b-4fb09f40c2e2/b955f1ca-a200-40b8-8e9b-4fb09f40c2e2.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b955f1ca-a200-40b8-8e9b-4fb09f40c2e2/b955f1ca-a200-40b8-8e9b-4fb09f40c2e2.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b955f1ca-a200-40b8-8e9b-4fb09f40c2e2/b955f1ca-a200-40b8-8e9b-4fb09f40c2e2.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A two-page Middle East policy briefing bearing former Treasury secretary Larry Summers’s name was found among the Jeffrey Epstein documents released through the House Oversight Committee. Dated to early 2013, the briefing summarized political and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A two-page Middle East policy briefing bearing former Treasury secretary Larry Summers’s name was found among the Jeffrey Epstein documents released through the House Oversight Committee. Dated to early 2013, the briefing summarized political and security developments across ten countries during the upheaval of the Arab Spring, including Egypt, Syria, Israel, Iran, Libya, Tunisia and Saudi Arabia. Its contents ranged from political assassinations and civil unrest to Iranian nuclear negotiations, Israeli military activity and regional diplomatic maneuvering. The sophistication and breadth of the analysis suggested it was prepared for a senior policymaker or someone with access to high-level foreign-policy reporting.<br /><br />The document adds another dimension to the long-running relationship between Summers and Epstein, showing that material connected to Summers and involving sensitive international affairs ended up in Epstein’s possession. However, the document alone does not establish whether Summers personally wrote it for Epstein, forwarded it to him or whether Epstein obtained it through someone else. Combined with later emails showing Summers seeking personal advice from Epstein and testimony that Summers introduced Bill Clinton to him, the briefing illustrates the extraordinary level of intellectual, political and institutional access Epstein cultivated. What Epstein intended to do with the information remains unknown, but its presence in his files raises further questions about why powerful officials continued providing him with privileged access long after his criminal conduct had become public.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://easternherald.com/2026/07/29/larry-summers-middle-east-briefing-epstein-files-house-oversight/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Larry Summers' 2013 Middle East Briefing in the Epstein Files</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>752</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The Many Scandals Of England's Most Scandalous Royal (7/31/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-many-scandals-of-england-s-most-scandalous-royal-7-31-26--73264883</link><description><![CDATA[Prince Andrew’s repeated scandals have become a lasting liability for the British monarchy, reinforcing the perception that royal status can shield powerful people from scrutiny and consequences. His friendship with Jeffrey Epstein, the allegations made against him by Virginia Giuffre, his disastrous BBC interview and the financial settlement that followed severely damaged his credibility. His subsequent battles over royal privileges, housing, security and public appearances kept the controversy alive long after he stepped back from official duties. Each new episode made it harder for the monarchy to present his behavior as an isolated embarrassment, because the institution often appeared slow, reluctant or inconsistent in distancing itself from him.<br /><br />The damage has spread beyond Andrew because the monarchy’s legitimacy depends heavily on public trust, restraint and the belief that its members uphold higher standards. For many people, Andrew came to symbolize entitlement, secrecy and a separate system of accountability for the wealthy and well connected. The royal family’s efforts to contain the fallout have also fed broader questions about transparency, public funding and whether the institution remains relevant in modern Britain. While Andrew alone did not create republican sentiment or public frustration with the monarchy, his scandals have given critics one of their strongest arguments and contributed to growing skepticism toward the institution as a whole.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73264883</guid><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73264883/megaandrewbbcinterviewandthewarning.mp3" length="44517742" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c74a2b01-a8e2-4afe-801a-69f8b9918ade/c74a2b01-a8e2-4afe-801a-69f8b9918ade.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c74a2b01-a8e2-4afe-801a-69f8b9918ade/c74a2b01-a8e2-4afe-801a-69f8b9918ade.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c74a2b01-a8e2-4afe-801a-69f8b9918ade/c74a2b01-a8e2-4afe-801a-69f8b9918ade.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Prince Andrew’s repeated scandals have become a lasting liability for the British monarchy, reinforcing the perception that royal status can shield powerful people from scrutiny and consequences. His friendship with Jeffrey Epstein, the allegations...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Prince Andrew’s repeated scandals have become a lasting liability for the British monarchy, reinforcing the perception that royal status can shield powerful people from scrutiny and consequences. His friendship with Jeffrey Epstein, the allegations made against him by Virginia Giuffre, his disastrous BBC interview and the financial settlement that followed severely damaged his credibility. His subsequent battles over royal privileges, housing, security and public appearances kept the controversy alive long after he stepped back from official duties. Each new episode made it harder for the monarchy to present his behavior as an isolated embarrassment, because the institution often appeared slow, reluctant or inconsistent in distancing itself from him.<br /><br />The damage has spread beyond Andrew because the monarchy’s legitimacy depends heavily on public trust, restraint and the belief that its members uphold higher standards. For many people, Andrew came to symbolize entitlement, secrecy and a separate system of accountability for the wealthy and well connected. The royal family’s efforts to contain the fallout have also fed broader questions about transparency, public funding and whether the institution remains relevant in modern Britain. While Andrew alone did not create republican sentiment or public frustration with the monarchy, his scandals have given critics one of their strongest arguments and contributed to growing skepticism toward the institution as a whole.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2783</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   Jeffrey Epstein, The Diddler On Wall Streets Roof (7/31/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-the-diddler-on-wall-streets-roof-7-31-26--73264881</link><description><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein cultivated the image of a major Wall Street operator by surrounding himself with billionaires, bankers, hedge-fund executives and private-equity leaders. His relationships with figures such as Leslie Wexner, Glenn Dubin, Leon Black and Jes Staley made him appear deeply embedded in the highest levels of finance, even though the precise origins of much of his fortune and the full scope of his investment business remained unusually opaque. Epstein presented himself as an exclusive financial adviser who worked only for the extraordinarily wealthy, and his access to powerful people helped discourage outsiders from questioning whether his reputation matched his actual record.<br /><br />Those connections became a form of social proof. Each wealthy client, famous acquaintance or influential banker appeared to confirm that Epstein must be legitimate, sophisticated and valuable, which in turn helped him attract additional relationships. He also positioned himself as a connector who could introduce financiers to scientists, politicians, academics and other members of the global elite, making access itself part of what he offered. By constantly displaying his proximity to respected and powerful people, Epstein fortified a carefully constructed reputation as a financial mastermind and indispensable middleman, allowing the prestige of his associates to conceal how little the public actually knew about his business.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73264881</guid><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 08:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73264881/megadiddleronwallstreetepstein.mp3" length="48003104" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/632be87f-8851-4e5c-b72a-5003dac91c4e/632be87f-8851-4e5c-b72a-5003dac91c4e.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/632be87f-8851-4e5c-b72a-5003dac91c4e/632be87f-8851-4e5c-b72a-5003dac91c4e.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/632be87f-8851-4e5c-b72a-5003dac91c4e/632be87f-8851-4e5c-b72a-5003dac91c4e.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jeffrey Epstein cultivated the image of a major Wall Street operator by surrounding himself with billionaires, bankers, hedge-fund executives and private-equity leaders. His relationships with figures such as Leslie Wexner, Glenn Dubin, Leon Black and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein cultivated the image of a major Wall Street operator by surrounding himself with billionaires, bankers, hedge-fund executives and private-equity leaders. His relationships with figures such as Leslie Wexner, Glenn Dubin, Leon Black and Jes Staley made him appear deeply embedded in the highest levels of finance, even though the precise origins of much of his fortune and the full scope of his investment business remained unusually opaque. Epstein presented himself as an exclusive financial adviser who worked only for the extraordinarily wealthy, and his access to powerful people helped discourage outsiders from questioning whether his reputation matched his actual record.<br /><br />Those connections became a form of social proof. Each wealthy client, famous acquaintance or influential banker appeared to confirm that Epstein must be legitimate, sophisticated and valuable, which in turn helped him attract additional relationships. He also positioned himself as a connector who could introduce financiers to scientists, politicians, academics and other members of the global elite, making access itself part of what he offered. By constantly displaying his proximity to respected and powerful people, Epstein fortified a carefully constructed reputation as a financial mastermind and indispensable middleman, allowing the prestige of his associates to conceal how little the public actually knew about his business.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3001</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Who Approved Jeffrey Epstein's Fake Science Foundation Hustle? (7/30/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-who-approved-jeffrey-epstein-s-fake-science-foundation-hustle-7-30-26--73264882</link><description><![CDATA[According to allegations from survivors and reporting about Epstein’s post-conviction activities, Jeffrey Epstein used the Florida Science Foundation as a convenient front to make his movements and work-release activities appear legitimate while he was serving his unusually lenient sentence and later living under supervision. The supposed nonprofit gave Epstein a respectable-sounding workplace connected to science and philanthropy, but critics have argued that it functioned largely as a shell that allowed him to leave custody, maintain access to his office and continue operating with remarkably little oversight. Rather than being confined in any meaningful sense, Epstein was permitted to spend long stretches away from jail under conditions that appeared tailored to his comfort, raising serious questions about whether authorities adequately verified what the foundation actually did or how Epstein was using it.<br /><br />Women have alleged that Epstein continued sexually abusing them at the foundation’s office while he was on work release and subject to court-ordered restrictions, meaning the conduct allegedly occurred under the noses of the jail, probation officials and local law enforcement. The accusations suggest that the very arrangement presented as punishment and rehabilitation instead restored Epstein’s access to vulnerable young women and gave him another controlled environment in which to offend. Authorities had already been warned about the scale of his predatory behavior, yet the supervision system reportedly failed to detect or stop what was happening, reinforcing the conclusion that Epstein’s wealth, lawyers and connections allowed him to turn a nominal sentence into something dangerously close to business as usual.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73264882</guid><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73264882/megaepsteinfakefoundationsilentscientists.mp3" length="51469209" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/263d83e9-5baa-4923-a6b8-2df0805733b7/263d83e9-5baa-4923-a6b8-2df0805733b7.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/263d83e9-5baa-4923-a6b8-2df0805733b7/263d83e9-5baa-4923-a6b8-2df0805733b7.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/263d83e9-5baa-4923-a6b8-2df0805733b7/263d83e9-5baa-4923-a6b8-2df0805733b7.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>According to allegations from survivors and reporting about Epstein’s post-conviction activities, Jeffrey Epstein used the Florida Science Foundation as a convenient front to make his movements and work-release activities appear legitimate while he...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[According to allegations from survivors and reporting about Epstein’s post-conviction activities, Jeffrey Epstein used the Florida Science Foundation as a convenient front to make his movements and work-release activities appear legitimate while he was serving his unusually lenient sentence and later living under supervision. The supposed nonprofit gave Epstein a respectable-sounding workplace connected to science and philanthropy, but critics have argued that it functioned largely as a shell that allowed him to leave custody, maintain access to his office and continue operating with remarkably little oversight. Rather than being confined in any meaningful sense, Epstein was permitted to spend long stretches away from jail under conditions that appeared tailored to his comfort, raising serious questions about whether authorities adequately verified what the foundation actually did or how Epstein was using it.<br /><br />Women have alleged that Epstein continued sexually abusing them at the foundation’s office while he was on work release and subject to court-ordered restrictions, meaning the conduct allegedly occurred under the noses of the jail, probation officials and local law enforcement. The accusations suggest that the very arrangement presented as punishment and rehabilitation instead restored Epstein’s access to vulnerable young women and gave him another controlled environment in which to offend. Authorities had already been warned about the scale of his predatory behavior, yet the supervision system reportedly failed to detect or stop what was happening, reinforcing the conclusion that Epstein’s wealth, lawyers and connections allowed him to turn a nominal sentence into something dangerously close to business as usual.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3217</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Murder In Moscow:  Transcripts From The Closed IGG Hearing (Part 5)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-transcripts-from-the-closed-igg-hearing-part-5--73221015</link><description><![CDATA[On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), which they argued violated Kohberger's Fourth Amendment rights. Detective Brett Payne testified that the IGG lead was treated as a tip, with further independent investigation conducted to substantiate its validity. Defense expert Dr. Leah Larkin suggested potential violations of FBI policy and genealogy database terms of service during the IGG process. However, Judge Hippler expressed skepticism regarding the defense's claims, noting the lack of a reasonable expectation of privacy for DNA left at a crime scene.<br /><br />Following the hearing, Judge Hippler ordered the release of a redacted transcript, balancing public interest with privacy concerns. Redactions included the names of surviving roommates and distant relatives identified through IGG. The unsealed portions provide insight into the investigative methods used and the defense's challenges to the evidence's admissibility. This development underscores the ongoing legal debates surrounding the use of IGG in criminal investigations and its implications for privacy and constitutional rights.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/022125-Transcript-Redacted-hearing-held-Jan23-2025.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">KB-25-01-23-Hearing-Redacted.ecl</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73221015</guid><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73221015/iggtranscripts5.mp3" length="10798019" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/de4eef8a-71b3-4cf1-8824-0a64fb563771/de4eef8a-71b3-4cf1-8824-0a64fb563771.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/de4eef8a-71b3-4cf1-8824-0a64fb563771/de4eef8a-71b3-4cf1-8824-0a64fb563771.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/de4eef8a-71b3-4cf1-8824-0a64fb563771/de4eef8a-71b3-4cf1-8824-0a64fb563771.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG),...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), which they argued violated Kohberger's Fourth Amendment rights. Detective Brett Payne testified that the IGG lead was treated as a tip, with further independent investigation conducted to substantiate its validity. Defense expert Dr. Leah Larkin suggested potential violations of FBI policy and genealogy database terms of service during the IGG process. However, Judge Hippler expressed skepticism regarding the defense's claims, noting the lack of a reasonable expectation of privacy for DNA left at a crime scene.<br /><br />Following the hearing, Judge Hippler ordered the release of a redacted transcript, balancing public interest with privacy concerns. Redactions included the names of surviving roommates and distant relatives identified through IGG. The unsealed portions provide insight into the investigative methods used and the defense's challenges to the evidence's admissibility. This development underscores the ongoing legal debates surrounding the use of IGG in criminal investigations and its implications for privacy and constitutional rights.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/022125-Transcript-Redacted-hearing-held-Jan23-2025.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">KB-25-01-23-Hearing-Redacted.ecl</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>675</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Murder In Moscow:  Transcripts From The Closed IGG Hearing (Part 4)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-transcripts-from-the-closed-igg-hearing-part-4--73239590</link><description><![CDATA[On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), which they argued violated Kohberger's Fourth Amendment rights. Detective Brett Payne testified that the IGG lead was treated as a tip, with further independent investigation conducted to substantiate its validity. Defense expert Dr. Leah Larkin suggested potential violations of FBI policy and genealogy database terms of service during the IGG process. However, Judge Hippler expressed skepticism regarding the defense's claims, noting the lack of a reasonable expectation of privacy for DNA left at a crime scene.<br /><br />Following the hearing, Judge Hippler ordered the release of a redacted transcript, balancing public interest with privacy concerns. Redactions included the names of surviving roommates and distant relatives identified through IGG. The unsealed portions provide insight into the investigative methods used and the defense's challenges to the evidence's admissibility. This development underscores the ongoing legal debates surrounding the use of IGG in criminal investigations and its implications for privacy and constitutional rights.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/022125-Transcript-Redacted-hearing-held-Jan23-2025.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">KB-25-01-23-Hearing-Redacted.ecl</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73239590</guid><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73239590/moscowdeathpenaltyorder4.mp3" length="13610466" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cbcd57d9-adaa-4368-a367-413fa7f729ad/cbcd57d9-adaa-4368-a367-413fa7f729ad.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cbcd57d9-adaa-4368-a367-413fa7f729ad/cbcd57d9-adaa-4368-a367-413fa7f729ad.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cbcd57d9-adaa-4368-a367-413fa7f729ad/cbcd57d9-adaa-4368-a367-413fa7f729ad.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG),...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), which they argued violated Kohberger's Fourth Amendment rights. Detective Brett Payne testified that the IGG lead was treated as a tip, with further independent investigation conducted to substantiate its validity. Defense expert Dr. Leah Larkin suggested potential violations of FBI policy and genealogy database terms of service during the IGG process. However, Judge Hippler expressed skepticism regarding the defense's claims, noting the lack of a reasonable expectation of privacy for DNA left at a crime scene.<br /><br />Following the hearing, Judge Hippler ordered the release of a redacted transcript, balancing public interest with privacy concerns. Redactions included the names of surviving roommates and distant relatives identified through IGG. The unsealed portions provide insight into the investigative methods used and the defense's challenges to the evidence's admissibility. This development underscores the ongoing legal debates surrounding the use of IGG in criminal investigations and its implications for privacy and constitutional rights.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/022125-Transcript-Redacted-hearing-held-Jan23-2025.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">KB-25-01-23-Hearing-Redacted.ecl</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>851</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Transcripts From The Hearing Dealing With Tyler Robinson’s Courtroom Appearance (Part 5) (7/30/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/transcripts-from-the-hearing-dealing-with-tyler-robinson-s-courtroom-appearance-part-5-7-30-26--73247877</link><description><![CDATA[The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson’s request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.<br /><br />Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff’s office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk’s shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff’s office’s filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Monday<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2025/12/tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73247877</guid><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73247877/robinsonhearingtranscript5.mp3" length="15299022" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2f391bac-a8ad-43a5-8e16-4190e72b093d/2f391bac-a8ad-43a5-8e16-4190e72b093d.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2f391bac-a8ad-43a5-8e16-4190e72b093d/2f391bac-a8ad-43a5-8e16-4190e72b093d.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2f391bac-a8ad-43a5-8e16-4190e72b093d/2f391bac-a8ad-43a5-8e16-4190e72b093d.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson’s request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson’s request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.<br /><br />Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff’s office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk’s shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff’s office’s filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Monday<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2025/12/tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>957</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Ted Waitt And The Transcript From His Epstein Related Trip To Congress (Part 2) (7/30/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/ted-waitt-and-the-transcript-from-his-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-2-7-30-26--73246757</link><description><![CDATA[Ted Waitt told the House Oversight Committee that he met Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein at a Hong Kong dinner in November 2003 and began dating Maxwell the following year, remaining in a relationship with her until September 2010. Waitt portrayed his own contact with Epstein as extremely limited, saying he had only a brief introduction at the dinner, one arranged meeting at Maxwell’s New York residence and two later chance encounters. He said he never communicated with Epstein by phone or email and had no business or financial relationship with him. Waitt testified that Maxwell described Epstein positively as a brilliant investor and money manager and told him that, after their romantic relationship ended, she continued working as an estate manager overseeing his properties and staff.<br /><br />Waitt said he wanted Maxwell to stop working for Epstein because Epstein was her former boyfriend, but claimed he had no knowledge at the time of their criminal conduct and never witnessed abuse, coercion or trafficking. He repeatedly said he could not confirm how much work Maxwell continued doing for Epstein while they dated, despite their seven-year relationship, and he denied knowing whether Epstein manipulated or abused her. Waitt also acknowledged that Maxwell had been around his four children, three of whom were girls, and said that had he known then what he knows now, he never would have befriended her or allowed her near them. His testimony largely presented him as someone who was intimately involved with Maxwell for years while remaining unaware of the reality of her relationship with Epstein and the crimes for which she was later convicted.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2026/05/Waitt-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GO120551</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73246757</guid><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73246757/waitt2.mp3" length="11434989" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/27b96edd-29f4-4309-a303-49a4e21e7222/27b96edd-29f4-4309-a303-49a4e21e7222.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/27b96edd-29f4-4309-a303-49a4e21e7222/27b96edd-29f4-4309-a303-49a4e21e7222.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/27b96edd-29f4-4309-a303-49a4e21e7222/27b96edd-29f4-4309-a303-49a4e21e7222.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Ted Waitt told the House Oversight Committee that he met Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein at a Hong Kong dinner in November 2003 and began dating Maxwell the following year, remaining in a relationship with her until September 2010. Waitt...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Ted Waitt told the House Oversight Committee that he met Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein at a Hong Kong dinner in November 2003 and began dating Maxwell the following year, remaining in a relationship with her until September 2010. Waitt portrayed his own contact with Epstein as extremely limited, saying he had only a brief introduction at the dinner, one arranged meeting at Maxwell’s New York residence and two later chance encounters. He said he never communicated with Epstein by phone or email and had no business or financial relationship with him. Waitt testified that Maxwell described Epstein positively as a brilliant investor and money manager and told him that, after their romantic relationship ended, she continued working as an estate manager overseeing his properties and staff.<br /><br />Waitt said he wanted Maxwell to stop working for Epstein because Epstein was her former boyfriend, but claimed he had no knowledge at the time of their criminal conduct and never witnessed abuse, coercion or trafficking. He repeatedly said he could not confirm how much work Maxwell continued doing for Epstein while they dated, despite their seven-year relationship, and he denied knowing whether Epstein manipulated or abused her. Waitt also acknowledged that Maxwell had been around his four children, three of whom were girls, and said that had he known then what he knows now, he never would have befriended her or allowed her near them. His testimony largely presented him as someone who was intimately involved with Maxwell for years while remaining unaware of the reality of her relationship with Epstein and the crimes for which she was later convicted.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2026/05/Waitt-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GO120551</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>715</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Ted Waitt And The Transcript From His Epstein Related Trip To Congress (Part 1) (7/30/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/ted-waitt-and-the-transcript-from-his-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-1-7-30-26--73246756</link><description><![CDATA[Ted Waitt told the House Oversight Committee that he met Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein at a Hong Kong dinner in November 2003 and began dating Maxwell the following year, remaining in a relationship with her until September 2010. Waitt portrayed his own contact with Epstein as extremely limited, saying he had only a brief introduction at the dinner, one arranged meeting at Maxwell’s New York residence and two later chance encounters. He said he never communicated with Epstein by phone or email and had no business or financial relationship with him. Waitt testified that Maxwell described Epstein positively as a brilliant investor and money manager and told him that, after their romantic relationship ended, she continued working as an estate manager overseeing his properties and staff.<br /><br />Waitt said he wanted Maxwell to stop working for Epstein because Epstein was her former boyfriend, but claimed he had no knowledge at the time of their criminal conduct and never witnessed abuse, coercion or trafficking. He repeatedly said he could not confirm how much work Maxwell continued doing for Epstein while they dated, despite their seven-year relationship, and he denied knowing whether Epstein manipulated or abused her. Waitt also acknowledged that Maxwell had been around his four children, three of whom were girls, and said that had he known then what he knows now, he never would have befriended her or allowed her near them. His testimony largely presented him as someone who was intimately involved with Maxwell for years while remaining unaware of the reality of her relationship with Epstein and the crimes for which she was later convicted.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2026/05/Waitt-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GO120551</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73246756</guid><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 20:30:01 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73246756/waitt1.mp3" length="13287802" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/da29b6df-60cf-40c7-b275-e804519c4e8d/da29b6df-60cf-40c7-b275-e804519c4e8d.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/da29b6df-60cf-40c7-b275-e804519c4e8d/da29b6df-60cf-40c7-b275-e804519c4e8d.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/da29b6df-60cf-40c7-b275-e804519c4e8d/da29b6df-60cf-40c7-b275-e804519c4e8d.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Ted Waitt told the House Oversight Committee that he met Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein at a Hong Kong dinner in November 2003 and began dating Maxwell the following year, remaining in a relationship with her until September 2010. Waitt...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Ted Waitt told the House Oversight Committee that he met Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein at a Hong Kong dinner in November 2003 and began dating Maxwell the following year, remaining in a relationship with her until September 2010. Waitt portrayed his own contact with Epstein as extremely limited, saying he had only a brief introduction at the dinner, one arranged meeting at Maxwell’s New York residence and two later chance encounters. He said he never communicated with Epstein by phone or email and had no business or financial relationship with him. Waitt testified that Maxwell described Epstein positively as a brilliant investor and money manager and told him that, after their romantic relationship ended, she continued working as an estate manager overseeing his properties and staff.<br /><br />Waitt said he wanted Maxwell to stop working for Epstein because Epstein was her former boyfriend, but claimed he had no knowledge at the time of their criminal conduct and never witnessed abuse, coercion or trafficking. He repeatedly said he could not confirm how much work Maxwell continued doing for Epstein while they dated, despite their seven-year relationship, and he denied knowing whether Epstein manipulated or abused her. Waitt also acknowledged that Maxwell had been around his four children, three of whom were girls, and said that had he known then what he knows now, he never would have befriended her or allowed her near them. His testimony largely presented him as someone who was intimately involved with Maxwell for years while remaining unaware of the reality of her relationship with Epstein and the crimes for which she was later convicted.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2026/05/Waitt-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GO120551</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>831</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Survivors Detail Abuse at Interlochen and Encounters With Jeffrey Epstein (7/30/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/survivors-detail-abuse-at-interlochen-and-encounters-with-jeffrey-epstein-7-30-26--73246779</link><description><![CDATA[An independent investigation commissioned by the Interlochen Center for the Arts documented approximately 70 firsthand accounts of alleged sexual misconduct by adults affiliated with the prestigious Michigan arts school and summer camp. Investigators conducted about 180 interviews and identified 47 accused individuals, including faculty members, teachers, residence staff, donors, trustees and visitors. The reported conduct stretched from the 1950s through the 2010s and ranged from grooming, sexual comments and inappropriate touching to allegations of rape, oral sex and long-term sexual relationships between adults and students. Former students described lasting consequences, including PTSD, damaged relationships, extensive therapy and abandoning musical or artistic careers because Interlochen had become inseparable from the abuse they said they experienced.<br /><br /><br />The investigation began after a former student reported alleged misconduct by longtime faculty member Byron Hanson, leading Interlochen to invite other alumni to come forward. Seven alumni gave firsthand accounts involving Hanson from the 1960s and 1970s, while numerous other employees and associates were accused of misconduct across later decades. The report also expanded scrutiny of Jeffrey Epstein’s access to the campus: two alumni reported sexual contact by Epstein after meeting him through Interlochen, where he was a donor and maintained a lodge. Interlochen said none of the 47 accused individuals remains employed there, referred the names to prosecutors and law enforcement, and announced additional safety, accountability and survivor-support measures while acknowledging that the institution must confront the harm described by its former students.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/local/michigan/2026/07/28/students-allege-grooming-sex-assaults-by-interlochen-staff-since-60s/91085021007/?gnt-cfr=1&amp;gca-cat=p&amp;gca-uir=true&amp;gca-epti=z115342p116350l003050c116350e1195xxv115342d--47--b--47--&amp;gca-ft=254&amp;gca-ds=sophi" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">70 Interlochen students allege past grooming, sex assaults by 47 adults</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73246779</guid><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 18:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73246779/interlochenreport.mp3" length="14443041" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0377e35c-56e2-4cbe-9eee-ed22507174e1/0377e35c-56e2-4cbe-9eee-ed22507174e1.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0377e35c-56e2-4cbe-9eee-ed22507174e1/0377e35c-56e2-4cbe-9eee-ed22507174e1.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0377e35c-56e2-4cbe-9eee-ed22507174e1/0377e35c-56e2-4cbe-9eee-ed22507174e1.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>An independent investigation commissioned by the Interlochen Center for the Arts documented approximately 70 firsthand accounts of alleged sexual misconduct by adults affiliated with the prestigious Michigan arts school and summer camp. Investigators...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[An independent investigation commissioned by the Interlochen Center for the Arts documented approximately 70 firsthand accounts of alleged sexual misconduct by adults affiliated with the prestigious Michigan arts school and summer camp. Investigators conducted about 180 interviews and identified 47 accused individuals, including faculty members, teachers, residence staff, donors, trustees and visitors. The reported conduct stretched from the 1950s through the 2010s and ranged from grooming, sexual comments and inappropriate touching to allegations of rape, oral sex and long-term sexual relationships between adults and students. Former students described lasting consequences, including PTSD, damaged relationships, extensive therapy and abandoning musical or artistic careers because Interlochen had become inseparable from the abuse they said they experienced.<br /><br /><br />The investigation began after a former student reported alleged misconduct by longtime faculty member Byron Hanson, leading Interlochen to invite other alumni to come forward. Seven alumni gave firsthand accounts involving Hanson from the 1960s and 1970s, while numerous other employees and associates were accused of misconduct across later decades. The report also expanded scrutiny of Jeffrey Epstein’s access to the campus: two alumni reported sexual contact by Epstein after meeting him through Interlochen, where he was a donor and maintained a lodge. Interlochen said none of the 47 accused individuals remains employed there, referred the names to prosecutors and law enforcement, and announced additional safety, accountability and survivor-support measures while acknowledging that the institution must confront the harm described by its former students.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/local/michigan/2026/07/28/students-allege-grooming-sex-assaults-by-interlochen-staff-since-60s/91085021007/?gnt-cfr=1&amp;gca-cat=p&amp;gca-uir=true&amp;gca-epti=z115342p116350l003050c116350e1195xxv115342d--47--b--47--&amp;gca-ft=254&amp;gca-ds=sophi" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">70 Interlochen students allege past grooming, sex assaults by 47 adults</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>903</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Murder In Moscow:  Bryan Kohberger Is Appointed Legal Counsel By The Court (7/30/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-bryan-kohberger-is-appointed-legal-counsel-by-the-court-7-30-26--73260997</link><description><![CDATA[Bryan Kohberger’s request for a new trial will first have to survive an initial review by the Idaho court, which must determine whether his post-conviction petition presents specific, legally sufficient claims that warrant further proceedings. Kohberger alleges that his guilty plea was produced by coercion, misinformation, false promises and the withholding or misrepresentation of potentially exculpatory evidence by his defense team. Should the court find that those allegations merit examination, the case could advance to responses from prosecutors, additional filings and potentially an evidentiary hearing where Kohberger, his former attorneys and other witnesses could be questioned. A new trial would not be automatic; he must first convince the court that his plea was not knowing, voluntary or supported by effective legal counsel.<br /><br />Credibility could become the decisive issue because Kohberger’s current account directly conflicts with what he repeatedly told Judge Steven Hippler when entering his plea. Under oath, Kohberger admitted killing Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, said he understood the agreement, denied being threatened or improperly pressured and expressed satisfaction with his attorneys. The court would therefore have to weigh his new accusations against that extensive plea-hearing record and the testimony of the lawyers he now blames. Even if Kohberger secured permission to withdraw the plea, the prosecution could revive the original murder case and potentially seek the death penalty again, leaving him to face the trial and punishment that the plea agreement allowed him to avoid.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapuccI@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.idahostatesman.com/news/local/crime/article316703506.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">How Bryan Kohberger’s post-conviction legal process works | Idaho Statesman</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73260997</guid><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73260997/kohbergerlawyerappointed.mp3" length="12596915" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5e1d561d-b1e2-4656-b183-1458d7eecf8d/5e1d561d-b1e2-4656-b183-1458d7eecf8d.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5e1d561d-b1e2-4656-b183-1458d7eecf8d/5e1d561d-b1e2-4656-b183-1458d7eecf8d.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5e1d561d-b1e2-4656-b183-1458d7eecf8d/5e1d561d-b1e2-4656-b183-1458d7eecf8d.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Bryan Kohberger’s request for a new trial will first have to survive an initial review by the Idaho court, which must determine whether his post-conviction petition presents specific, legally sufficient claims that warrant further proceedings....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Bryan Kohberger’s request for a new trial will first have to survive an initial review by the Idaho court, which must determine whether his post-conviction petition presents specific, legally sufficient claims that warrant further proceedings. Kohberger alleges that his guilty plea was produced by coercion, misinformation, false promises and the withholding or misrepresentation of potentially exculpatory evidence by his defense team. Should the court find that those allegations merit examination, the case could advance to responses from prosecutors, additional filings and potentially an evidentiary hearing where Kohberger, his former attorneys and other witnesses could be questioned. A new trial would not be automatic; he must first convince the court that his plea was not knowing, voluntary or supported by effective legal counsel.<br /><br />Credibility could become the decisive issue because Kohberger’s current account directly conflicts with what he repeatedly told Judge Steven Hippler when entering his plea. Under oath, Kohberger admitted killing Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, said he understood the agreement, denied being threatened or improperly pressured and expressed satisfaction with his attorneys. The court would therefore have to weigh his new accusations against that extensive plea-hearing record and the testimony of the lawyers he now blames. Even if Kohberger secured permission to withdraw the plea, the prosecution could revive the original murder case and potentially seek the death penalty again, leaving him to face the trial and punishment that the plea agreement allowed him to avoid.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapuccI@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.idahostatesman.com/news/local/crime/article316703506.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">How Bryan Kohberger’s post-conviction legal process works | Idaho Statesman</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>788</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Todd Blanche Confirmation Fight and the Future of Epstein Justice (7/30/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-todd-blanche-confirmation-fight-and-the-future-of-epstein-justice-7-30-26--73246785</link><description><![CDATA[Epstein survivors and legal experts warned that Todd Blanche’s expected confirmation as attorney general could further obstruct efforts to secure accountability for Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking operation. Survivors urged Republican senators Thom Tillis and John Cornyn to reject Blanche, accusing him of repeatedly mishandling the case while serving as acting attorney general. They said his Justice Department released victims’ names, photographs and identifying information while withholding the identities of alleged abusers and enablers. Survivors also described a recent meeting with Blanche as an hour of deflection, interruption and gaslighting, arguing that his leadership had produced neither meaningful transparency nor new prosecutions beyond Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.<br /><br />Attorneys interviewed said a Blanche-led Justice Department would likely mean continued document suppression and few, if any, active investigations into the wealthy and influential people surrounding Epstein. Although survivors could pursue public-records litigation or lawsuits challenging the government’s failures, experts warned that those paths would be slow, expensive and extremely difficult to win. The Justice Department disputed the criticism, calling its meeting with survivors productive and saying Blanche encouraged them to speak with FBI investigators. Survivor advocates nevertheless described his likely confirmation as a major setback, while insisting that continued public pressure, congressional action and future political changes could still create another path toward justice.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jul/27/epstein-survivors-todd-blanche-justice" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Blanche-led DoJ likely to derail Epstein survivors’ pursuit of justice, experts say | Jeffrey Epstein | The Guardian</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73246785</guid><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73246785/survivornofaithinblanche.mp3" length="14631541" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/93641477-7226-4375-bd15-55ede4b8e75c/93641477-7226-4375-bd15-55ede4b8e75c.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/93641477-7226-4375-bd15-55ede4b8e75c/93641477-7226-4375-bd15-55ede4b8e75c.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/93641477-7226-4375-bd15-55ede4b8e75c/93641477-7226-4375-bd15-55ede4b8e75c.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Epstein survivors and legal experts warned that Todd Blanche’s expected confirmation as attorney general could further obstruct efforts to secure accountability for Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking operation. Survivors urged Republican senators Thom...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Epstein survivors and legal experts warned that Todd Blanche’s expected confirmation as attorney general could further obstruct efforts to secure accountability for Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking operation. Survivors urged Republican senators Thom Tillis and John Cornyn to reject Blanche, accusing him of repeatedly mishandling the case while serving as acting attorney general. They said his Justice Department released victims’ names, photographs and identifying information while withholding the identities of alleged abusers and enablers. Survivors also described a recent meeting with Blanche as an hour of deflection, interruption and gaslighting, arguing that his leadership had produced neither meaningful transparency nor new prosecutions beyond Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.<br /><br />Attorneys interviewed said a Blanche-led Justice Department would likely mean continued document suppression and few, if any, active investigations into the wealthy and influential people surrounding Epstein. Although survivors could pursue public-records litigation or lawsuits challenging the government’s failures, experts warned that those paths would be slow, expensive and extremely difficult to win. The Justice Department disputed the criticism, calling its meeting with survivors productive and saying Blanche encouraged them to speak with FBI investigators. Survivor advocates nevertheless described his likely confirmation as a major setback, while insisting that continued public pressure, congressional action and future political changes could still create another path toward justice.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jul/27/epstein-survivors-todd-blanche-justice" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Blanche-led DoJ likely to derail Epstein survivors’ pursuit of justice, experts say | Jeffrey Epstein | The Guardian</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>915</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor Faces Another Public Humiliation (7/30/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/andrew-mountbatten-windsor-faces-another-public-humiliation-7-30-26--73246775</link><description><![CDATA[The City of London Corporation is developing a new internal procedure that could allow it to revoke Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s Freedom of the City of London. Officials concluded that no existing legal mechanism permitted them to simply remove the status, which Andrew obtained through patrimony in 2012 because his father, Prince Philip, was a Freeman. The Corporation had previously asked Andrew to surrender the distinction voluntarily, but he refused, prompting members to pursue a formal process for taking it away.<br /><br />The effort represents another blow for Andrew after King Charles stripped him of his royal titles, dukedom and major honours in 2025 amid continuing scrutiny of his association with Jeffrey Epstein. The legal difficulty is that the Freedom is considered a property right rather than merely a ceremonial honour, giving it protections under British law and the European Convention on Human Rights. Once the new procedure is approved, the Court of Common Council would still need to hold a separate vote specifically determining whether Andrew’s Freedom should be revoked.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.gbnews.com/royal/andrew-mountbatten-windsor-suffers-blow-strip-honour" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor suffers fresh blow as legal officials creating mechanism to remove honour from him</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73246775</guid><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 13:01:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73246775/andrewmorehonorsstripped.mp3" length="10222907" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/fed48b9c-6d2b-4c3a-b03d-def005f53bb0/fed48b9c-6d2b-4c3a-b03d-def005f53bb0.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/fed48b9c-6d2b-4c3a-b03d-def005f53bb0/fed48b9c-6d2b-4c3a-b03d-def005f53bb0.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/fed48b9c-6d2b-4c3a-b03d-def005f53bb0/fed48b9c-6d2b-4c3a-b03d-def005f53bb0.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The City of London Corporation is developing a new internal procedure that could allow it to revoke Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s Freedom of the City of London. Officials concluded that no existing legal mechanism permitted them to simply remove the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The City of London Corporation is developing a new internal procedure that could allow it to revoke Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s Freedom of the City of London. Officials concluded that no existing legal mechanism permitted them to simply remove the status, which Andrew obtained through patrimony in 2012 because his father, Prince Philip, was a Freeman. The Corporation had previously asked Andrew to surrender the distinction voluntarily, but he refused, prompting members to pursue a formal process for taking it away.<br /><br />The effort represents another blow for Andrew after King Charles stripped him of his royal titles, dukedom and major honours in 2025 amid continuing scrutiny of his association with Jeffrey Epstein. The legal difficulty is that the Freedom is considered a property right rather than merely a ceremonial honour, giving it protections under British law and the European Convention on Human Rights. Once the new procedure is approved, the Court of Common Council would still need to hold a separate vote specifically determining whether Andrew’s Freedom should be revoked.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.gbnews.com/royal/andrew-mountbatten-windsor-suffers-blow-strip-honour" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor suffers fresh blow as legal officials creating mechanism to remove honour from him</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>639</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The House That Maxwell Built (7/30/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-house-that-maxwell-built-7-30-26--73240382</link><description><![CDATA[On today's morning update we continue our look at Robert Maxwell and the upcoming documentary based on him and his family, The house of Maxwell. According to the folks who made the documentary, Robert Maxwell was a man with no loyalties but to himself and a man who not only worked for British intelligence, but a man who also had his fingers in many pies. <br /><br />Let's dive in and discuss it!<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />To contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br />https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-10681277/Robert-Maxwell-no-loyalties-claims-new-documentary.html<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73240382</guid><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73240382/megahouseofmaxwell.mp3" length="24206986" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1a619444-103c-4118-8b3b-250bc59dddbd/1a619444-103c-4118-8b3b-250bc59dddbd.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1a619444-103c-4118-8b3b-250bc59dddbd/1a619444-103c-4118-8b3b-250bc59dddbd.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1a619444-103c-4118-8b3b-250bc59dddbd/1a619444-103c-4118-8b3b-250bc59dddbd.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On today's morning update we continue our look at Robert Maxwell and the upcoming documentary based on him and his family, The house of Maxwell. According to the folks who made the documentary, Robert Maxwell was a man with no loyalties but to himself...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On today's morning update we continue our look at Robert Maxwell and the upcoming documentary based on him and his family, The house of Maxwell. According to the folks who made the documentary, Robert Maxwell was a man with no loyalties but to himself and a man who not only worked for British intelligence, but a man who also had his fingers in many pies. <br /><br />Let's dive in and discuss it!<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />To contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br />https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-10681277/Robert-Maxwell-no-loyalties-claims-new-documentary.html<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1513</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  How Did Virginia Roberts Meet Prince Andrew? (7/30/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-how-did-virginia-roberts-meet-prince-andrew-7-30-26--73240372</link><description><![CDATA[Virginia Roberts Giuffre has long alleged that she was introduced to Prince Andrew through Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in 2001, when she was 17 years old. According to her account, she first met the Duke of York at Maxwell’s London townhouse, where she was allegedly instructed to provide him with sexual services. Giuffre has said that Epstein and Maxwell orchestrated the encounter and pressured her into the situation, presenting Andrew as another powerful man within Epstein’s circle. A now-famous photograph shows Prince Andrew with his arm around Giuffre’s waist, with Maxwell smiling in the background—an image that has become central to her claims.<br /><br /><br />She further alleges that Epstein arranged two additional encounters: one at his Manhattan mansion and another on his private Caribbean island, Little St. James. In each instance, Giuffre has maintained she was directed to be intimate with Andrew as part of Epstein’s trafficking operation. Prince Andrew has categorically denied her claims, publicly stating he has “no recollection” of ever meeting her, disputing the photo’s authenticity, and maintaining that he never engaged in sexual activity with her.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><a href="https://protonmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">bobbycapucci@protonmail.com</a><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10930179/NIGEL-CAWTHORNE-reveals-Virginia-Roberts-introduced-Prince-Andrew.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10930179/NIGEL-CAWTHORNE-reveals-Virginia-Roberts-introduced-Prince-Andrew.html</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73240372</guid><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73240372/comphowvirginiametandy.mp3" length="35088135" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/31c16be4-2f7e-49f1-9313-b60abc41e23f/31c16be4-2f7e-49f1-9313-b60abc41e23f.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/31c16be4-2f7e-49f1-9313-b60abc41e23f/31c16be4-2f7e-49f1-9313-b60abc41e23f.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/31c16be4-2f7e-49f1-9313-b60abc41e23f/31c16be4-2f7e-49f1-9313-b60abc41e23f.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Virginia Roberts Giuffre has long alleged that she was introduced to Prince Andrew through Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in 2001, when she was 17 years old. According to her account, she first met the Duke of York at Maxwell’s London...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Virginia Roberts Giuffre has long alleged that she was introduced to Prince Andrew through Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in 2001, when she was 17 years old. According to her account, she first met the Duke of York at Maxwell’s London townhouse, where she was allegedly instructed to provide him with sexual services. Giuffre has said that Epstein and Maxwell orchestrated the encounter and pressured her into the situation, presenting Andrew as another powerful man within Epstein’s circle. A now-famous photograph shows Prince Andrew with his arm around Giuffre’s waist, with Maxwell smiling in the background—an image that has become central to her claims.<br /><br /><br />She further alleges that Epstein arranged two additional encounters: one at his Manhattan mansion and another on his private Caribbean island, Little St. James. In each instance, Giuffre has maintained she was directed to be intimate with Andrew as part of Epstein’s trafficking operation. Prince Andrew has categorically denied her claims, publicly stating he has “no recollection” of ever meeting her, disputing the photo’s authenticity, and maintaining that he never engaged in sexual activity with her.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><a href="https://protonmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">bobbycapucci@protonmail.com</a><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10930179/NIGEL-CAWTHORNE-reveals-Virginia-Roberts-introduced-Prince-Andrew.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10930179/NIGEL-CAWTHORNE-reveals-Virginia-Roberts-introduced-Prince-Andrew.html</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2193</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   The FBI And Their Pursuit Of A Conversation With Disgraced  Andrew (7/29/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-fbi-and-their-pursuit-of-a-conversation-with-disgraced-andrew-7-29-26--73215923</link><description><![CDATA[Calls for Prince Andrew to speak with the FBI began in late 2019, shortly after Jeffrey Epstein’s arrest and subsequent death, when U.S. investigators turned their attention to Epstein’s inner circle. Andrew’s long-standing friendship with Epstein — including his stays at Epstein’s New York mansion and the widely circulated photo with Virginia Giuffre — made him a person of interest in the ongoing probe. U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman publicly urged the Duke of York to cooperate, revealing that Andrew had provided “zero cooperation” despite his earlier public pledge to assist investigators. The announcement set off a firestorm in both the UK and U.S., with media outlets accusing the prince of hiding behind royal privilege and fueling public outrage over perceived double standards.<br /><br />By early 2020, the pressure only intensified. Lawmakers, victims’ advocates, and legal experts demanded that Andrew face questioning under oath, arguing that his testimony could shed light on Epstein’s trafficking network and the powerful figures who enabled it. The FBI reportedly reached out multiple times through formal channels, but Andrew’s legal team stalled, citing procedural concerns and jurisdictional issues. His refusal to cooperate became an international embarrassment for Buckingham Palace, further damaging the royal family’s reputation and strengthening the perception that Andrew was being shielded from accountability. What began as calls for cooperation soon evolved into a symbol of royal impunity — the moment when the world saw how far the palace would go to protect one of its own.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact  me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73215923</guid><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73215923/megaandrewfbicalls.mp3" length="32366803" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7ba6fb1f-faea-46a3-bdf8-7ce6d93c2653/7ba6fb1f-faea-46a3-bdf8-7ce6d93c2653.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7ba6fb1f-faea-46a3-bdf8-7ce6d93c2653/7ba6fb1f-faea-46a3-bdf8-7ce6d93c2653.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7ba6fb1f-faea-46a3-bdf8-7ce6d93c2653/7ba6fb1f-faea-46a3-bdf8-7ce6d93c2653.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Calls for Prince Andrew to speak with the FBI began in late 2019, shortly after Jeffrey Epstein’s arrest and subsequent death, when U.S. investigators turned their attention to Epstein’s inner circle. Andrew’s long-standing friendship with Epstein —...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Calls for Prince Andrew to speak with the FBI began in late 2019, shortly after Jeffrey Epstein’s arrest and subsequent death, when U.S. investigators turned their attention to Epstein’s inner circle. Andrew’s long-standing friendship with Epstein — including his stays at Epstein’s New York mansion and the widely circulated photo with Virginia Giuffre — made him a person of interest in the ongoing probe. U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman publicly urged the Duke of York to cooperate, revealing that Andrew had provided “zero cooperation” despite his earlier public pledge to assist investigators. The announcement set off a firestorm in both the UK and U.S., with media outlets accusing the prince of hiding behind royal privilege and fueling public outrage over perceived double standards.<br /><br />By early 2020, the pressure only intensified. Lawmakers, victims’ advocates, and legal experts demanded that Andrew face questioning under oath, arguing that his testimony could shed light on Epstein’s trafficking network and the powerful figures who enabled it. The FBI reportedly reached out multiple times through formal channels, but Andrew’s legal team stalled, citing procedural concerns and jurisdictional issues. His refusal to cooperate became an international embarrassment for Buckingham Palace, further damaging the royal family’s reputation and strengthening the perception that Andrew was being shielded from accountability. What began as calls for cooperation soon evolved into a symbol of royal impunity — the moment when the world saw how far the palace would go to protect one of its own.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact  me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2023</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Murder In Moscow:  Transcripts From The Closed IGG Hearing (Part 3)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-transcripts-from-the-closed-igg-hearing-part-3--73239593</link><description><![CDATA[On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), which they argued violated Kohberger's Fourth Amendment rights. Detective Brett Payne testified that the IGG lead was treated as a tip, with further independent investigation conducted to substantiate its validity. Defense expert Dr. Leah Larkin suggested potential violations of FBI policy and genealogy database terms of service during the IGG process. However, Judge Hippler expressed skepticism regarding the defense's claims, noting the lack of a reasonable expectation of privacy for DNA left at a crime scene.<br /><br />Following the hearing, Judge Hippler ordered the release of a redacted transcript, balancing public interest with privacy concerns. Redactions included the names of surviving roommates and distant relatives identified through IGG. The unsealed portions provide insight into the investigative methods used and the defense's challenges to the evidence's admissibility. This development underscores the ongoing legal debates surrounding the use of IGG in criminal investigations and its implications for privacy and constitutional rights.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/022125-Transcript-Redacted-hearing-held-Jan23-2025.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">KB-25-01-23-Hearing-Redacted.ecl</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73239593</guid><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73239593/moscowdeathpenaltyorder3.mp3" length="11854620" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6e760e70-d098-42ed-aa2a-5849d3c6b242/6e760e70-d098-42ed-aa2a-5849d3c6b242.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6e760e70-d098-42ed-aa2a-5849d3c6b242/6e760e70-d098-42ed-aa2a-5849d3c6b242.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6e760e70-d098-42ed-aa2a-5849d3c6b242/6e760e70-d098-42ed-aa2a-5849d3c6b242.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG),...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), which they argued violated Kohberger's Fourth Amendment rights. Detective Brett Payne testified that the IGG lead was treated as a tip, with further independent investigation conducted to substantiate its validity. Defense expert Dr. Leah Larkin suggested potential violations of FBI policy and genealogy database terms of service during the IGG process. However, Judge Hippler expressed skepticism regarding the defense's claims, noting the lack of a reasonable expectation of privacy for DNA left at a crime scene.<br /><br />Following the hearing, Judge Hippler ordered the release of a redacted transcript, balancing public interest with privacy concerns. Redactions included the names of surviving roommates and distant relatives identified through IGG. The unsealed portions provide insight into the investigative methods used and the defense's challenges to the evidence's admissibility. This development underscores the ongoing legal debates surrounding the use of IGG in criminal investigations and its implications for privacy and constitutional rights.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/022125-Transcript-Redacted-hearing-held-Jan23-2025.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">KB-25-01-23-Hearing-Redacted.ecl</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>741</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Murder In Moscow:  Transcripts From The Closed IGG Hearing (Part 2)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-transcripts-from-the-closed-igg-hearing-part-2--73239592</link><description><![CDATA[On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), which they argued violated Kohberger's Fourth Amendment rights. Detective Brett Payne testified that the IGG lead was treated as a tip, with further independent investigation conducted to substantiate its validity. Defense expert Dr. Leah Larkin suggested potential violations of FBI policy and genealogy database terms of service during the IGG process. However, Judge Hippler expressed skepticism regarding the defense's claims, noting the lack of a reasonable expectation of privacy for DNA left at a crime scene.<br /><br />Following the hearing, Judge Hippler ordered the release of a redacted transcript, balancing public interest with privacy concerns. Redactions included the names of surviving roommates and distant relatives identified through IGG. The unsealed portions provide insight into the investigative methods used and the defense's challenges to the evidence's admissibility. This development underscores the ongoing legal debates surrounding the use of IGG in criminal investigations and its implications for privacy and constitutional rights.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/022125-Transcript-Redacted-hearing-held-Jan23-2025.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">KB-25-01-23-Hearing-Redacted.ecl</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73239592</guid><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73239592/moscowdeathpenaltyorder2.mp3" length="12324824" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ee7c0dc1-f973-42cd-8b09-29500a85c863/ee7c0dc1-f973-42cd-8b09-29500a85c863.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ee7c0dc1-f973-42cd-8b09-29500a85c863/ee7c0dc1-f973-42cd-8b09-29500a85c863.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ee7c0dc1-f973-42cd-8b09-29500a85c863/ee7c0dc1-f973-42cd-8b09-29500a85c863.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG),...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), which they argued violated Kohberger's Fourth Amendment rights. Detective Brett Payne testified that the IGG lead was treated as a tip, with further independent investigation conducted to substantiate its validity. Defense expert Dr. Leah Larkin suggested potential violations of FBI policy and genealogy database terms of service during the IGG process. However, Judge Hippler expressed skepticism regarding the defense's claims, noting the lack of a reasonable expectation of privacy for DNA left at a crime scene.<br /><br />Following the hearing, Judge Hippler ordered the release of a redacted transcript, balancing public interest with privacy concerns. Redactions included the names of surviving roommates and distant relatives identified through IGG. The unsealed portions provide insight into the investigative methods used and the defense's challenges to the evidence's admissibility. This development underscores the ongoing legal debates surrounding the use of IGG in criminal investigations and its implications for privacy and constitutional rights.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/022125-Transcript-Redacted-hearing-held-Jan23-2025.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">KB-25-01-23-Hearing-Redacted.ecl</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>771</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Murder In Moscow:  Transcripts From The Closed IGG Hearing (Part 1)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-transcripts-from-the-closed-igg-hearing-part-1--73239591</link><description><![CDATA[On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), which they argued violated Kohberger's Fourth Amendment rights. Detective Brett Payne testified that the IGG lead was treated as a tip, with further independent investigation conducted to substantiate its validity. Defense expert Dr. Leah Larkin suggested potential violations of FBI policy and genealogy database terms of service during the IGG process. However, Judge Hippler expressed skepticism regarding the defense's claims, noting the lack of a reasonable expectation of privacy for DNA left at a crime scene.<br /><br />Following the hearing, Judge Hippler ordered the release of a redacted transcript, balancing public interest with privacy concerns. Redactions included the names of surviving roommates and distant relatives identified through IGG. The unsealed portions provide insight into the investigative methods used and the defense's challenges to the evidence's admissibility. This development underscores the ongoing legal debates surrounding the use of IGG in criminal investigations and its implications for privacy and constitutional rights.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/022125-Transcript-Redacted-hearing-held-Jan23-2025.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">KB-25-01-23-Hearing-Redacted.ecl</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73239591</guid><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 00:30:01 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73239591/moscowdeathpenaltyorder1.mp3" length="14609389" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e6d5aec5-d3ee-4b67-abcf-75f7596591ce/e6d5aec5-d3ee-4b67-abcf-75f7596591ce.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e6d5aec5-d3ee-4b67-abcf-75f7596591ce/e6d5aec5-d3ee-4b67-abcf-75f7596591ce.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e6d5aec5-d3ee-4b67-abcf-75f7596591ce/e6d5aec5-d3ee-4b67-abcf-75f7596591ce.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG),...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), which they argued violated Kohberger's Fourth Amendment rights. Detective Brett Payne testified that the IGG lead was treated as a tip, with further independent investigation conducted to substantiate its validity. Defense expert Dr. Leah Larkin suggested potential violations of FBI policy and genealogy database terms of service during the IGG process. However, Judge Hippler expressed skepticism regarding the defense's claims, noting the lack of a reasonable expectation of privacy for DNA left at a crime scene.<br /><br />Following the hearing, Judge Hippler ordered the release of a redacted transcript, balancing public interest with privacy concerns. Redactions included the names of surviving roommates and distant relatives identified through IGG. The unsealed portions provide insight into the investigative methods used and the defense's challenges to the evidence's admissibility. This development underscores the ongoing legal debates surrounding the use of IGG in criminal investigations and its implications for privacy and constitutional rights.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/022125-Transcript-Redacted-hearing-held-Jan23-2025.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">KB-25-01-23-Hearing-Redacted.ecl</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>914</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Transcripts From The Hearing Dealing With Tyler Robinson’s Courtroom Appearance (Part 4) (7/29/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/transcripts-from-the-hearing-dealing-with-tyler-robinson-s-courtroom-appearance-part-4-7-29-26--73219411</link><description><![CDATA[The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson’s request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.<br /><br />Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff’s office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk’s shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff’s office’s filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Monday<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2025/12/tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73219411</guid><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73219411/robinsonhearingtranscript4.mp3" length="15858251" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/687cbe8e-4d42-48ff-a8a4-380b81d521c4/687cbe8e-4d42-48ff-a8a4-380b81d521c4.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/687cbe8e-4d42-48ff-a8a4-380b81d521c4/687cbe8e-4d42-48ff-a8a4-380b81d521c4.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/687cbe8e-4d42-48ff-a8a4-380b81d521c4/687cbe8e-4d42-48ff-a8a4-380b81d521c4.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson’s request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson’s request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.<br /><br />Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff’s office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk’s shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff’s office’s filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Monday<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2025/12/tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>992</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvu</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Inside Karyna Shuliak’s Life With Jeffrey Epstein (Part 2) (7/29/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/inside-karyna-shuliak-s-life-with-jeffrey-epstein-part-2-7-29-26--73240223</link><description><![CDATA[Karyna Shuliak, a 37-year-old Belarus-born dentist, emerged from newly released investigative records as Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime girlfriend and one of the potential principal beneficiaries of his remaining fortune. Shuliak met Epstein in 2011, when she was 21 and living in New York on a temporary student visa, and remained close to him for nearly eight years. Epstein financed her education, helped her pursue a dental career and provided extensive financial support to her and her family. The records also indicated that he helped arrange her marriage to one of his female assistants after she encountered immigration problems, a marriage congressional Democrats later questioned as potentially fraudulent. Shuliak eventually obtained U.S. citizenship, while immigration authorities have not publicly challenged the legality of the process.<br /><br />Shuliak was also the last person Epstein called before his death in federal custody in August 2019, and estate documents indicated that she could inherit as much as $100 million, along with a massive diamond ring and other valuable assets. The actual amount remains uncertain because Epstein’s estate has paid substantial compensation to survivors and incurred other expenses. The newly released records portrayed Shuliak as more than a casual girlfriend: she traveled with Epstein, coordinated household employees, supervised work at his properties and enjoyed broad access to his money. Despite that proximity, she has not publicly identified herself as a victim, has not been accused by federal authorities of participating in Epstein’s trafficking operation and apparently was never interviewed by the FBI or deposed by attorneys representing his survivors.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/07/26/business/jeffrey-epstein-girlfriend-estate.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Meet Jeffrey Epstein’s Girlfriend, Who Stands to Inherit Much of His Estate - The New York Times</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73240223</guid><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73240223/shuliak2.mp3" length="14890675" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9cb0d486-66c5-4965-86f9-ae816a33f558/9cb0d486-66c5-4965-86f9-ae816a33f558.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9cb0d486-66c5-4965-86f9-ae816a33f558/9cb0d486-66c5-4965-86f9-ae816a33f558.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9cb0d486-66c5-4965-86f9-ae816a33f558/9cb0d486-66c5-4965-86f9-ae816a33f558.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Karyna Shuliak, a 37-year-old Belarus-born dentist, emerged from newly released investigative records as Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime girlfriend and one of the potential principal beneficiaries of his remaining fortune. Shuliak met Epstein in 2011, when...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Karyna Shuliak, a 37-year-old Belarus-born dentist, emerged from newly released investigative records as Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime girlfriend and one of the potential principal beneficiaries of his remaining fortune. Shuliak met Epstein in 2011, when she was 21 and living in New York on a temporary student visa, and remained close to him for nearly eight years. Epstein financed her education, helped her pursue a dental career and provided extensive financial support to her and her family. The records also indicated that he helped arrange her marriage to one of his female assistants after she encountered immigration problems, a marriage congressional Democrats later questioned as potentially fraudulent. Shuliak eventually obtained U.S. citizenship, while immigration authorities have not publicly challenged the legality of the process.<br /><br />Shuliak was also the last person Epstein called before his death in federal custody in August 2019, and estate documents indicated that she could inherit as much as $100 million, along with a massive diamond ring and other valuable assets. The actual amount remains uncertain because Epstein’s estate has paid substantial compensation to survivors and incurred other expenses. The newly released records portrayed Shuliak as more than a casual girlfriend: she traveled with Epstein, coordinated household employees, supervised work at his properties and enjoyed broad access to his money. Despite that proximity, she has not publicly identified herself as a victim, has not been accused by federal authorities of participating in Epstein’s trafficking operation and apparently was never interviewed by the FBI or deposed by attorneys representing his survivors.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/07/26/business/jeffrey-epstein-girlfriend-estate.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Meet Jeffrey Epstein’s Girlfriend, Who Stands to Inherit Much of His Estate - The New York Times</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>931</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Inside Karyna Shuliak’s Life With Jeffrey Epstein (Part 1) (7/29/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/inside-karyna-shuliak-s-life-with-jeffrey-epstein-part-1-7-29-26--73240222</link><description><![CDATA[Karyna Shuliak, a 37-year-old Belarus-born dentist, emerged from newly released investigative records as Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime girlfriend and one of the potential principal beneficiaries of his remaining fortune. Shuliak met Epstein in 2011, when she was 21 and living in New York on a temporary student visa, and remained close to him for nearly eight years. Epstein financed her education, helped her pursue a dental career and provided extensive financial support to her and her family. The records also indicated that he helped arrange her marriage to one of his female assistants after she encountered immigration problems, a marriage congressional Democrats later questioned as potentially fraudulent. Shuliak eventually obtained U.S. citizenship, while immigration authorities have not publicly challenged the legality of the process.<br /><br />Shuliak was also the last person Epstein called before his death in federal custody in August 2019, and estate documents indicated that she could inherit as much as $100 million, along with a massive diamond ring and other valuable assets. The actual amount remains uncertain because Epstein’s estate has paid substantial compensation to survivors and incurred other expenses. The newly released records portrayed Shuliak as more than a casual girlfriend: she traveled with Epstein, coordinated household employees, supervised work at his properties and enjoyed broad access to his money. Despite that proximity, she has not publicly identified herself as a victim, has not been accused by federal authorities of participating in Epstein’s trafficking operation and apparently was never interviewed by the FBI or deposed by attorneys representing his survivors.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/07/26/business/jeffrey-epstein-girlfriend-estate.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Meet Jeffrey Epstein’s Girlfriend, Who Stands to Inherit Much of His Estate - The New York Times</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73240222</guid><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 18:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73240222/shuliak1.mp3" length="13613392" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cfce2de6-e79e-4c50-a722-de583dc17b96/cfce2de6-e79e-4c50-a722-de583dc17b96.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cfce2de6-e79e-4c50-a722-de583dc17b96/cfce2de6-e79e-4c50-a722-de583dc17b96.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cfce2de6-e79e-4c50-a722-de583dc17b96/cfce2de6-e79e-4c50-a722-de583dc17b96.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Karyna Shuliak, a 37-year-old Belarus-born dentist, emerged from newly released investigative records as Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime girlfriend and one of the potential principal beneficiaries of his remaining fortune. Shuliak met Epstein in 2011, when...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Karyna Shuliak, a 37-year-old Belarus-born dentist, emerged from newly released investigative records as Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime girlfriend and one of the potential principal beneficiaries of his remaining fortune. Shuliak met Epstein in 2011, when she was 21 and living in New York on a temporary student visa, and remained close to him for nearly eight years. Epstein financed her education, helped her pursue a dental career and provided extensive financial support to her and her family. The records also indicated that he helped arrange her marriage to one of his female assistants after she encountered immigration problems, a marriage congressional Democrats later questioned as potentially fraudulent. Shuliak eventually obtained U.S. citizenship, while immigration authorities have not publicly challenged the legality of the process.<br /><br />Shuliak was also the last person Epstein called before his death in federal custody in August 2019, and estate documents indicated that she could inherit as much as $100 million, along with a massive diamond ring and other valuable assets. The actual amount remains uncertain because Epstein’s estate has paid substantial compensation to survivors and incurred other expenses. The newly released records portrayed Shuliak as more than a casual girlfriend: she traveled with Epstein, coordinated household employees, supervised work at his properties and enjoyed broad access to his money. Despite that proximity, she has not publicly identified herself as a victim, has not been accused by federal authorities of participating in Epstein’s trafficking operation and apparently was never interviewed by the FBI or deposed by attorneys representing his survivors.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/07/26/business/jeffrey-epstein-girlfriend-estate.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Meet Jeffrey Epstein’s Girlfriend, Who Stands to Inherit Much of His Estate - The New York Times</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>851</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Murder In Moscow Bryan Kohberger’s New Argument Faces an Uphill Battle With The Court (7/29/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-bryan-kohberger-s-new-argument-faces-an-uphill-battle-with-the-court-7-29-26--73240201</link><description><![CDATA[Bryan Kohberger’s attempt to withdraw his guilty plea partly rests on his claim that his attorneys failed to tell him about potentially exculpatory evidence, specifically “clumps of unknown hair” reportedly found in Ethan Chapin’s hand. Kohberger alleged that his defense team pressured him into falsely confessing through coercion, misinformation, unfulfilled promises and the withholding of evidence. Former FBI agent Chris Whitcomb said the approximately six-inch, dark-blond or light-brown hairs did not resemble Kohberger’s and questioned why they were not subjected to DNA testing, presenting the issue as one of the few pieces of evidence Kohberger could use to argue that someone else might have been present.<br /><br />Legal experts nevertheless described the argument as a long shot. Reports indicated that a defense expert had found the hair morphologically consistent with Chapin’s own hair, undermining the suggestion that it belonged to an unidentified attacker. To obtain post-conviction relief, Kohberger would need to demonstrate that his lawyers were constitutionally ineffective, that prosecutors suppressed favorable evidence or that his plea was not knowing and voluntary. That would be difficult because he repeatedly told the judge under oath that he understood the agreement and was pleading guilty voluntarily, receiving four life sentences while avoiding a possible death sentence.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://nypost.com/2026/07/28/us-news/bryan-kohbergers-appeal-hangs-on-a-clump-of-hair-found-in-victims-hand/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bryan Kohberger's appeal hangs on a 'clump of hair' found in victim's hand</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73240201</guid><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 16:42:07 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73240201/kohbergerclumphair.mp3" length="10089160" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f713f1ee-ac35-4316-85c6-45edb81f3471/f713f1ee-ac35-4316-85c6-45edb81f3471.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f713f1ee-ac35-4316-85c6-45edb81f3471/f713f1ee-ac35-4316-85c6-45edb81f3471.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f713f1ee-ac35-4316-85c6-45edb81f3471/f713f1ee-ac35-4316-85c6-45edb81f3471.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Bryan Kohberger’s attempt to withdraw his guilty plea partly rests on his claim that his attorneys failed to tell him about potentially exculpatory evidence, specifically “clumps of unknown hair” reportedly found in Ethan Chapin’s hand. Kohberger...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Bryan Kohberger’s attempt to withdraw his guilty plea partly rests on his claim that his attorneys failed to tell him about potentially exculpatory evidence, specifically “clumps of unknown hair” reportedly found in Ethan Chapin’s hand. Kohberger alleged that his defense team pressured him into falsely confessing through coercion, misinformation, unfulfilled promises and the withholding of evidence. Former FBI agent Chris Whitcomb said the approximately six-inch, dark-blond or light-brown hairs did not resemble Kohberger’s and questioned why they were not subjected to DNA testing, presenting the issue as one of the few pieces of evidence Kohberger could use to argue that someone else might have been present.<br /><br />Legal experts nevertheless described the argument as a long shot. Reports indicated that a defense expert had found the hair morphologically consistent with Chapin’s own hair, undermining the suggestion that it belonged to an unidentified attacker. To obtain post-conviction relief, Kohberger would need to demonstrate that his lawyers were constitutionally ineffective, that prosecutors suppressed favorable evidence or that his plea was not knowing and voluntary. That would be difficult because he repeatedly told the judge under oath that he understood the agreement and was pleading guilty voluntarily, receiving four life sentences while avoiding a possible death sentence.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://nypost.com/2026/07/28/us-news/bryan-kohbergers-appeal-hangs-on-a-clump-of-hair-found-in-victims-hand/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bryan Kohberger's appeal hangs on a 'clump of hair' found in victim's hand</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>631</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>James Comer Rips Leon Black Over Epstein Stonewalling (7/29/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/james-comer-rips-leon-black-over-epstein-stonewalling-7-29-26--73219410</link><description><![CDATA[House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer tore into Leon Black for what he described as a bad-faith effort to obstruct Congress’s investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. After Black refused to answer questions during his voluntary interview about nondisclosure agreements involving women, Comer subpoenaed him to return for a sworn deposition and ordered him to produce the agreements. Black subsequently turned over only one NDA, involving former model Guzel Ganieva, prompting Comer to accuse him of withholding material the committee had specifically demanded. Comer warned that Black’s refusal to provide complete answers and documents could lead to contempt proceedings and a criminal referral, making clear that the billionaire would not be permitted to dictate which parts of his Epstein relationship Congress was allowed to examine.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Comer emphasized that the NDAs were not a side issue because investigators wanted to know whether Epstein helped negotiate the agreements, participated in payments to women or possessed information that could explain the extraordinary financial relationship between the two men. Black paid Epstein approximately $158 million for tax and estate-planning services and later paid $62.5 million to resolve potential claims brought by the U.S. Virgin Islands. Black’s attorney insisted he had complied and claimed the Ganieva agreement was the only relevant NDA Epstein knew about, but Comer plainly was not buying that explanation. His response amounted to a direct accusation that Black had stonewalled the committee, provided an incomplete production and continued hiding behind lawyers and confidentiality agreements rather than giving Congress and Epstein’s survivors the transparency they had been promised.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.rawstory.com/leon-black-epstein-2677270167/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Comer blasts Epstein associate stonewalling on demands: ‘This is unacceptable' - Raw Story</a><br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73219410</guid><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73219410/leonblackblastedbycomer.mp3" length="10067426" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/023ee004-20d2-4d2b-b522-6c48bff5ee1b/023ee004-20d2-4d2b-b522-6c48bff5ee1b.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/023ee004-20d2-4d2b-b522-6c48bff5ee1b/023ee004-20d2-4d2b-b522-6c48bff5ee1b.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/023ee004-20d2-4d2b-b522-6c48bff5ee1b/023ee004-20d2-4d2b-b522-6c48bff5ee1b.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer tore into Leon Black for what he described as a bad-faith effort to obstruct Congress’s investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. After Black refused to answer questions during his voluntary interview about...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer tore into Leon Black for what he described as a bad-faith effort to obstruct Congress’s investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. After Black refused to answer questions during his voluntary interview about nondisclosure agreements involving women, Comer subpoenaed him to return for a sworn deposition and ordered him to produce the agreements. Black subsequently turned over only one NDA, involving former model Guzel Ganieva, prompting Comer to accuse him of withholding material the committee had specifically demanded. Comer warned that Black’s refusal to provide complete answers and documents could lead to contempt proceedings and a criminal referral, making clear that the billionaire would not be permitted to dictate which parts of his Epstein relationship Congress was allowed to examine.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Comer emphasized that the NDAs were not a side issue because investigators wanted to know whether Epstein helped negotiate the agreements, participated in payments to women or possessed information that could explain the extraordinary financial relationship between the two men. Black paid Epstein approximately $158 million for tax and estate-planning services and later paid $62.5 million to resolve potential claims brought by the U.S. Virgin Islands. Black’s attorney insisted he had complied and claimed the Ganieva agreement was the only relevant NDA Epstein knew about, but Comer plainly was not buying that explanation. His response amounted to a direct accusation that Black had stonewalled the committee, provided an incomplete production and continued hiding behind lawyers and confidentiality agreements rather than giving Congress and Epstein’s survivors the transparency they had been promised.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.rawstory.com/leon-black-epstein-2677270167/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Comer blasts Epstein associate stonewalling on demands: ‘This is unacceptable' - Raw Story</a><br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>630</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Autopsy Fails to Explain Death of Epstein-Linked Modeling Scout Daniel Siad (7/29/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/autopsy-fails-to-explain-death-of-epstein-linked-modeling-scout-daniel-siad-7-29-26--73219407</link><description><![CDATA[An autopsy failed to establish an immediate cause of death for Daniel Siad, the 69-year-old modeling scout who was found dead at his home in Bois-Colombes, near Paris. French prosecutors said examiners found no evidence of recent violence connected to his death, but noted that Siad was in poor overall health and had suffered an earlier heart attack, potentially leaving him vulnerable to sudden cardiac death. Authorities have ordered toxicology testing and an anatomical pathology examination, while the Hauts-de-Seine territorial police continue investigating exactly how he died.<br /><br />Siad died while French authorities were investigating allegations that he recruited women for Jeffrey Epstein, including during scouting trips connected to Morocco. He faced five complaints in France involving allegations of rape and human trafficking, although he denied wrongdoing and had not been formally charged. Former Swedish model Ebba P. Karlsson accused Siad of raping and sexually exploiting her when she was 20. Prosecutors said the wider investigation into an alleged organized trafficking network connected to Epstein would continue, while the child-protection organization Innocence en danger argued that years of investigative delays allowed Siad and other potentially important figures to die before victims received answers or justice.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.moroccoworldnews.com/2026/07/331202/autopsy-finds-no-immediate-cause-of-death-for-morocco-linked-epstein-figure-daniel-siad/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Autopsy Finds ‘No Immediate Cause of Death’ for Morocco-Linked Epstein Figure Daniel Siad</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73219407</guid><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73219407/siadprelimautopsy.mp3" length="9948726" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1293c34d-310c-4ead-9150-deb957cd029e/1293c34d-310c-4ead-9150-deb957cd029e.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1293c34d-310c-4ead-9150-deb957cd029e/1293c34d-310c-4ead-9150-deb957cd029e.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1293c34d-310c-4ead-9150-deb957cd029e/1293c34d-310c-4ead-9150-deb957cd029e.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>An autopsy failed to establish an immediate cause of death for Daniel Siad, the 69-year-old modeling scout who was found dead at his home in Bois-Colombes, near Paris. French prosecutors said examiners found no evidence of recent violence connected to...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[An autopsy failed to establish an immediate cause of death for Daniel Siad, the 69-year-old modeling scout who was found dead at his home in Bois-Colombes, near Paris. French prosecutors said examiners found no evidence of recent violence connected to his death, but noted that Siad was in poor overall health and had suffered an earlier heart attack, potentially leaving him vulnerable to sudden cardiac death. Authorities have ordered toxicology testing and an anatomical pathology examination, while the Hauts-de-Seine territorial police continue investigating exactly how he died.<br /><br />Siad died while French authorities were investigating allegations that he recruited women for Jeffrey Epstein, including during scouting trips connected to Morocco. He faced five complaints in France involving allegations of rape and human trafficking, although he denied wrongdoing and had not been formally charged. Former Swedish model Ebba P. Karlsson accused Siad of raping and sexually exploiting her when she was 20. Prosecutors said the wider investigation into an alleged organized trafficking network connected to Epstein would continue, while the child-protection organization Innocence en danger argued that years of investigative delays allowed Siad and other potentially important figures to die before victims received answers or justice.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.moroccoworldnews.com/2026/07/331202/autopsy-finds-no-immediate-cause-of-death-for-morocco-linked-epstein-figure-daniel-siad/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Autopsy Finds ‘No Immediate Cause of Death’ for Morocco-Linked Epstein Figure Daniel Siad</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>622</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   Prince Andrew And The Chaos He Caused For His Parents (7/29/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-prince-andrew-and-the-chaos-he-caused-for-his-parents-7-29-26--73215924</link><description><![CDATA[Prince Andrew’s Epstein disgrace reportedly created a deep strain inside the royal family because Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip appeared to respond to the crisis from very different emotional positions. The Queen was widely portrayed as a mother who, despite the public humiliation and institutional damage, remained personally protective of Andrew for as long as she could. She allowed him to retain certain symbols of status for years after the Epstein scandal had already become a public catastrophe, and even after his disastrous 2019 BBC interview forced him to step back from public duties. Prince Philip, by contrast, was often described as far less sentimental about the damage Andrew had done to the monarchy, viewing the scandal as a disgrace that threatened the dignity, discipline, and public standing of the Crown.<br /><br /><br />That difference reportedly produced a rift because Andrew was not merely dealing with a private embarrassment; he had dragged the monarchy into the orbit of Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Virginia Giuffre’s allegations, federal scrutiny, and public outrage over elite impunity. For Philip, the scandal represented the kind of self-inflicted humiliation that the royal family could not afford, especially because Andrew’s explanations made the situation worse rather than better. For the Queen, the issue was more complicated because Andrew was still her son, and that maternal loyalty seemed to clash with the cold institutional reality that he had become a liability. In the end, the Epstein revelations exposed not only Andrew’s judgment, but also the painful divide between family loyalty and the survival instincts of the monarchy itself.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73215924</guid><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73215924/megaandrewprinceofchaos.mp3" length="40953774" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6c21d59d-efb3-4898-ad12-0ee32dd68507/6c21d59d-efb3-4898-ad12-0ee32dd68507.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6c21d59d-efb3-4898-ad12-0ee32dd68507/6c21d59d-efb3-4898-ad12-0ee32dd68507.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6c21d59d-efb3-4898-ad12-0ee32dd68507/6c21d59d-efb3-4898-ad12-0ee32dd68507.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Prince Andrew’s Epstein disgrace reportedly created a deep strain inside the royal family because Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip appeared to respond to the crisis from very different emotional positions. The Queen was widely portrayed as a...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Prince Andrew’s Epstein disgrace reportedly created a deep strain inside the royal family because Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip appeared to respond to the crisis from very different emotional positions. The Queen was widely portrayed as a mother who, despite the public humiliation and institutional damage, remained personally protective of Andrew for as long as she could. She allowed him to retain certain symbols of status for years after the Epstein scandal had already become a public catastrophe, and even after his disastrous 2019 BBC interview forced him to step back from public duties. Prince Philip, by contrast, was often described as far less sentimental about the damage Andrew had done to the monarchy, viewing the scandal as a disgrace that threatened the dignity, discipline, and public standing of the Crown.<br /><br /><br />That difference reportedly produced a rift because Andrew was not merely dealing with a private embarrassment; he had dragged the monarchy into the orbit of Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Virginia Giuffre’s allegations, federal scrutiny, and public outrage over elite impunity. For Philip, the scandal represented the kind of self-inflicted humiliation that the royal family could not afford, especially because Andrew’s explanations made the situation worse rather than better. For the Queen, the issue was more complicated because Andrew was still her son, and that maternal loyalty seemed to clash with the cold institutional reality that he had become a liability. In the end, the Epstein revelations exposed not only Andrew’s judgment, but also the painful divide between family loyalty and the survival instincts of the monarchy itself.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2560</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   Jeffrey Epstein And The Predators Assistant (7/28/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-the-predators-assistant-7-28-26--73215956</link><description><![CDATA[Sarah Kellen (also known as Sarah Vickers or Sarah Kensington) is widely described as one of the key assistants to Jeffrey Epstein during the 2000s — a role in which she allegedly managed and coordinated many of the logistical and operational elements of Epstein’s sex-trafficking network. Court records, witness statements, and investigative reporting claim that Kellen was responsible for arranging “massages” (in many cases euphemisms for sexual encounters), scheduling flights on Epstein’s private jets, keeping contact lists of girls, and effectively acting as a gatekeeper for victims who were transported to various properties<br /><br />Despite her deep involvement, Kellen has never faced criminal charges. Federal judges and prosecutors have described her as a “knowing participant” and a “criminally responsible” figure in Epstein’s network, yet she remains free — claiming she was also a victim of Epstein’s control. Many survivors reject that narrative, arguing that she had full agency and willingly helped enable the abuse of minors. Her story underscores a broader truth about the Epstein case: that key facilitators, assistants, and coordinators — often women — operated the machinery of exploitation with precision, and most have evaded accountability under the guise of victimhood.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73215956</guid><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73215956/megavickerspredatorsassistant.mp3" length="25870881" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/937d0278-9598-4e8b-9ecf-f237d3fa0342/937d0278-9598-4e8b-9ecf-f237d3fa0342.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/937d0278-9598-4e8b-9ecf-f237d3fa0342/937d0278-9598-4e8b-9ecf-f237d3fa0342.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/937d0278-9598-4e8b-9ecf-f237d3fa0342/937d0278-9598-4e8b-9ecf-f237d3fa0342.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Sarah Kellen (also known as Sarah Vickers or Sarah Kensington) is widely described as one of the key assistants to Jeffrey Epstein during the 2000s — a role in which she allegedly managed and coordinated many of the logistical and operational elements...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Sarah Kellen (also known as Sarah Vickers or Sarah Kensington) is widely described as one of the key assistants to Jeffrey Epstein during the 2000s — a role in which she allegedly managed and coordinated many of the logistical and operational elements of Epstein’s sex-trafficking network. Court records, witness statements, and investigative reporting claim that Kellen was responsible for arranging “massages” (in many cases euphemisms for sexual encounters), scheduling flights on Epstein’s private jets, keeping contact lists of girls, and effectively acting as a gatekeeper for victims who were transported to various properties<br /><br />Despite her deep involvement, Kellen has never faced criminal charges. Federal judges and prosecutors have described her as a “knowing participant” and a “criminally responsible” figure in Epstein’s network, yet she remains free — claiming she was also a victim of Epstein’s control. Many survivors reject that narrative, arguing that she had full agency and willingly helped enable the abuse of minors. Her story underscores a broader truth about the Epstein case: that key facilitators, assistants, and coordinators — often women — operated the machinery of exploitation with precision, and most have evaded accountability under the guise of victimhood.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1617</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Bryan Kohberger And The Essay He Wrote While At DeSales University (Part 2)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/bryan-kohberger-and-the-essay-he-wrote-while-at-desales-university-part-2--73217456</link><description><![CDATA[​In 2020, while pursuing a master's degree in criminal justice at DeSales University, Bryan Kohberger authored a 12-page essay titled "Crime-Scene Scenario Final." This academic paper detailed procedures for processing a crime scene, emphasizing methods to prevent contamination, such as the use of fiber-free overalls, gloves, and booties. Kohberger also discussed the importance of collecting DNA evidence and analyzing surveillance footage to identify suspects. The essay centered around a case involving a 35-year-old woman who was stabbed to death in a trailer park, though it remains unclear if this scenario was hypothetical or based on real events.<br /><br />Prosecutors in Kohberger's ongoing trial for the 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students have introduced this essay as evidence, arguing that it demonstrates his extensive knowledge of crime scene investigation techniques. They contend that the detailed understanding reflected in his writing suggests a capability to commit the alleged crimes with precision and an awareness of how to avoid leaving incriminating evidence. The trial is scheduled to begin in August 2025, with jury selection commencing on July 30.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73217456</guid><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73217456/kohbergeressay2.mp3" length="18174999" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b522a52e-5e20-4456-b744-f1ab337ba917/b522a52e-5e20-4456-b744-f1ab337ba917.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b522a52e-5e20-4456-b744-f1ab337ba917/b522a52e-5e20-4456-b744-f1ab337ba917.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b522a52e-5e20-4456-b744-f1ab337ba917/b522a52e-5e20-4456-b744-f1ab337ba917.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>​In 2020, while pursuing a master's degree in criminal justice at DeSales University, Bryan Kohberger authored a 12-page essay titled "Crime-Scene Scenario Final." This academic paper detailed procedures for processing a crime scene, emphasizing...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[​In 2020, while pursuing a master's degree in criminal justice at DeSales University, Bryan Kohberger authored a 12-page essay titled "Crime-Scene Scenario Final." This academic paper detailed procedures for processing a crime scene, emphasizing methods to prevent contamination, such as the use of fiber-free overalls, gloves, and booties. Kohberger also discussed the importance of collecting DNA evidence and analyzing surveillance footage to identify suspects. The essay centered around a case involving a 35-year-old woman who was stabbed to death in a trailer park, though it remains unclear if this scenario was hypothetical or based on real events.<br /><br />Prosecutors in Kohberger's ongoing trial for the 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students have introduced this essay as evidence, arguing that it demonstrates his extensive knowledge of crime scene investigation techniques. They contend that the detailed understanding reflected in his writing suggests a capability to commit the alleged crimes with precision and an awareness of how to avoid leaving incriminating evidence. The trial is scheduled to begin in August 2025, with jury selection commencing on July 30.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1136</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Bryan Kohberger And The Essay He Wrote While At DeSales University (Part 1)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/bryan-kohberger-and-the-essay-he-wrote-while-at-desales-university-part-1--73217457</link><description><![CDATA[​In 2020, while pursuing a master's degree in criminal justice at DeSales University, Bryan Kohberger authored a 12-page essay titled "Crime-Scene Scenario Final." This academic paper detailed procedures for processing a crime scene, emphasizing methods to prevent contamination, such as the use of fiber-free overalls, gloves, and booties. Kohberger also discussed the importance of collecting DNA evidence and analyzing surveillance footage to identify suspects. The essay centered around a case involving a 35-year-old woman who was stabbed to death in a trailer park, though it remains unclear if this scenario was hypothetical or based on real events.<br /><br />Prosecutors in Kohberger's ongoing trial for the 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students have introduced this essay as evidence, arguing that it demonstrates his extensive knowledge of crime scene investigation techniques. They contend that the detailed understanding reflected in his writing suggests a capability to commit the alleged crimes with precision and an awareness of how to avoid leaving incriminating evidence. The trial is scheduled to begin in August 2025, with jury selection commencing on July 30.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73217457</guid><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73217457/kohbergeressay1.mp3" length="11703737" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/089a148d-23fe-4029-b137-39f6d985c691/089a148d-23fe-4029-b137-39f6d985c691.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/089a148d-23fe-4029-b137-39f6d985c691/089a148d-23fe-4029-b137-39f6d985c691.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/089a148d-23fe-4029-b137-39f6d985c691/089a148d-23fe-4029-b137-39f6d985c691.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>​In 2020, while pursuing a master's degree in criminal justice at DeSales University, Bryan Kohberger authored a 12-page essay titled "Crime-Scene Scenario Final." This academic paper detailed procedures for processing a crime scene, emphasizing...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[​In 2020, while pursuing a master's degree in criminal justice at DeSales University, Bryan Kohberger authored a 12-page essay titled "Crime-Scene Scenario Final." This academic paper detailed procedures for processing a crime scene, emphasizing methods to prevent contamination, such as the use of fiber-free overalls, gloves, and booties. Kohberger also discussed the importance of collecting DNA evidence and analyzing surveillance footage to identify suspects. The essay centered around a case involving a 35-year-old woman who was stabbed to death in a trailer park, though it remains unclear if this scenario was hypothetical or based on real events.<br /><br />Prosecutors in Kohberger's ongoing trial for the 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students have introduced this essay as evidence, arguing that it demonstrates his extensive knowledge of crime scene investigation techniques. They contend that the detailed understanding reflected in his writing suggests a capability to commit the alleged crimes with precision and an awareness of how to avoid leaving incriminating evidence. The trial is scheduled to begin in August 2025, with jury selection commencing on July 30.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>732</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Jeffrey Epstein And The Transcript From His 1981 SEC Deposition (Part 4) (7/28/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/jeffrey-epstein-and-the-transcript-from-his-1981-sec-deposition-part-4-7-28-26--73197157</link><description><![CDATA[In April 1981, Jeffrey Epstein testified before the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of an inquiry involving trading in St. Joe Minerals securities. Epstein described himself as a limited partner and account executive at Bear Stearns who assisted the sales force with commodities and financial-futures recommendations. The questioning focused heavily on his recent departure from the firm, his handling of client accounts and an incident in which he had loaned money to a close friend who used it in connection with a brokerage account. Epstein acknowledged making the loan but insisted it had not been concealed and said he had not initially understood that such an arrangement presented a regulatory problem.<br /><br />Epstein maintained that his resignation was unrelated to the St. Joe Minerals investigation and said he left because he was dissatisfied with how Bear Stearns handled the inquiry into the loan. He repeatedly denied discussing St. Joe Minerals with members of the firm’s executive committee and portrayed his departure as voluntary, submitting resignation letters dated March 12 and March 25. The testimony also revealed details about his rapid rise at Bear Stearns and his compensation: he said he had earned more than $200,000 the previous year, including a $135,000 bonus, and expected another sizable payment after leaving. Overall, the deposition showed Epstein defending his conduct, minimizing the seriousness of the loan arrangement and distancing his resignation from the securities matter under investigation.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.sec.gov/files/epstein-deposition-and-exhibits.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jeffrey Epstein Transcript and Exhibits</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73197157</guid><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73197157/epsteinsecdeposition4.mp3" length="11648984" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e583f812-e9b4-4f53-b217-f8f0b34c48ec/e583f812-e9b4-4f53-b217-f8f0b34c48ec.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e583f812-e9b4-4f53-b217-f8f0b34c48ec/e583f812-e9b4-4f53-b217-f8f0b34c48ec.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e583f812-e9b4-4f53-b217-f8f0b34c48ec/e583f812-e9b4-4f53-b217-f8f0b34c48ec.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In April 1981, Jeffrey Epstein testified before the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of an inquiry involving trading in St. Joe Minerals securities. Epstein described himself as a limited partner and account executive at Bear Stearns who...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In April 1981, Jeffrey Epstein testified before the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of an inquiry involving trading in St. Joe Minerals securities. Epstein described himself as a limited partner and account executive at Bear Stearns who assisted the sales force with commodities and financial-futures recommendations. The questioning focused heavily on his recent departure from the firm, his handling of client accounts and an incident in which he had loaned money to a close friend who used it in connection with a brokerage account. Epstein acknowledged making the loan but insisted it had not been concealed and said he had not initially understood that such an arrangement presented a regulatory problem.<br /><br />Epstein maintained that his resignation was unrelated to the St. Joe Minerals investigation and said he left because he was dissatisfied with how Bear Stearns handled the inquiry into the loan. He repeatedly denied discussing St. Joe Minerals with members of the firm’s executive committee and portrayed his departure as voluntary, submitting resignation letters dated March 12 and March 25. The testimony also revealed details about his rapid rise at Bear Stearns and his compensation: he said he had earned more than $200,000 the previous year, including a $135,000 bonus, and expected another sizable payment after leaving. Overall, the deposition showed Epstein defending his conduct, minimizing the seriousness of the loan arrangement and distancing his resignation from the securities matter under investigation.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.sec.gov/files/epstein-deposition-and-exhibits.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jeffrey Epstein Transcript and Exhibits</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>729</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Jeffrey Epstein And The Transcript From His 1981 SEC Deposition (Part 3) (7/28/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/jeffrey-epstein-and-the-transcript-from-his-1981-sec-deposition-part-3-7-28-26--73196948</link><description><![CDATA[In April 1981, Jeffrey Epstein testified before the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of an inquiry involving trading in St. Joe Minerals securities. Epstein described himself as a limited partner and account executive at Bear Stearns who assisted the sales force with commodities and financial-futures recommendations. The questioning focused heavily on his recent departure from the firm, his handling of client accounts and an incident in which he had loaned money to a close friend who used it in connection with a brokerage account. Epstein acknowledged making the loan but insisted it had not been concealed and said he had not initially understood that such an arrangement presented a regulatory problem.<br /><br />Epstein maintained that his resignation was unrelated to the St. Joe Minerals investigation and said he left because he was dissatisfied with how Bear Stearns handled the inquiry into the loan. He repeatedly denied discussing St. Joe Minerals with members of the firm’s executive committee and portrayed his departure as voluntary, submitting resignation letters dated March 12 and March 25. The testimony also revealed details about his rapid rise at Bear Stearns and his compensation: he said he had earned more than $200,000 the previous year, including a $135,000 bonus, and expected another sizable payment after leaving. Overall, the deposition showed Epstein defending his conduct, minimizing the seriousness of the loan arrangement and distancing his resignation from the securities matter under investigation.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.sec.gov/files/epstein-deposition-and-exhibits.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jeffrey Epstein Transcript and Exhibits</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73196948</guid><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73196948/epsteinsecdeposition3.mp3" length="11686600" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3a99f91b-bdd8-40cd-a66c-a99728913675/3a99f91b-bdd8-40cd-a66c-a99728913675.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3a99f91b-bdd8-40cd-a66c-a99728913675/3a99f91b-bdd8-40cd-a66c-a99728913675.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3a99f91b-bdd8-40cd-a66c-a99728913675/3a99f91b-bdd8-40cd-a66c-a99728913675.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In April 1981, Jeffrey Epstein testified before the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of an inquiry involving trading in St. Joe Minerals securities. Epstein described himself as a limited partner and account executive at Bear Stearns who...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In April 1981, Jeffrey Epstein testified before the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of an inquiry involving trading in St. Joe Minerals securities. Epstein described himself as a limited partner and account executive at Bear Stearns who assisted the sales force with commodities and financial-futures recommendations. The questioning focused heavily on his recent departure from the firm, his handling of client accounts and an incident in which he had loaned money to a close friend who used it in connection with a brokerage account. Epstein acknowledged making the loan but insisted it had not been concealed and said he had not initially understood that such an arrangement presented a regulatory problem.<br /><br />Epstein maintained that his resignation was unrelated to the St. Joe Minerals investigation and said he left because he was dissatisfied with how Bear Stearns handled the inquiry into the loan. He repeatedly denied discussing St. Joe Minerals with members of the firm’s executive committee and portrayed his departure as voluntary, submitting resignation letters dated March 12 and March 25. The testimony also revealed details about his rapid rise at Bear Stearns and his compensation: he said he had earned more than $200,000 the previous year, including a $135,000 bonus, and expected another sizable payment after leaving. Overall, the deposition showed Epstein defending his conduct, minimizing the seriousness of the loan arrangement and distancing his resignation from the securities matter under investigation.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.sec.gov/files/epstein-deposition-and-exhibits.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jeffrey Epstein Transcript and Exhibits</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>731</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Jeffrey Epstein And The Transcript From His 1981 SEC Deposition (Part 2) (7/28/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/jeffrey-epstein-and-the-transcript-from-his-1981-sec-deposition-part-2-7-28-26--73196949</link><description><![CDATA[In April 1981, Jeffrey Epstein testified before the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of an inquiry involving trading in St. Joe Minerals securities. Epstein described himself as a limited partner and account executive at Bear Stearns who assisted the sales force with commodities and financial-futures recommendations. The questioning focused heavily on his recent departure from the firm, his handling of client accounts and an incident in which he had loaned money to a close friend who used it in connection with a brokerage account. Epstein acknowledged making the loan but insisted it had not been concealed and said he had not initially understood that such an arrangement presented a regulatory problem.<br /><br />Epstein maintained that his resignation was unrelated to the St. Joe Minerals investigation and said he left because he was dissatisfied with how Bear Stearns handled the inquiry into the loan. He repeatedly denied discussing St. Joe Minerals with members of the firm’s executive committee and portrayed his departure as voluntary, submitting resignation letters dated March 12 and March 25. The testimony also revealed details about his rapid rise at Bear Stearns and his compensation: he said he had earned more than $200,000 the previous year, including a $135,000 bonus, and expected another sizable payment after leaving. Overall, the deposition showed Epstein defending his conduct, minimizing the seriousness of the loan arrangement and distancing his resignation from the securities matter under investigation.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.sec.gov/files/epstein-deposition-and-exhibits.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jeffrey Epstein Transcript and Exhibits</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73196949</guid><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73196949/epsteinsecdeposition2.mp3" length="12407580" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/65e76002-c9e9-44ce-877f-5fd1115c8367/65e76002-c9e9-44ce-877f-5fd1115c8367.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/65e76002-c9e9-44ce-877f-5fd1115c8367/65e76002-c9e9-44ce-877f-5fd1115c8367.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/65e76002-c9e9-44ce-877f-5fd1115c8367/65e76002-c9e9-44ce-877f-5fd1115c8367.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In April 1981, Jeffrey Epstein testified before the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of an inquiry involving trading in St. Joe Minerals securities. Epstein described himself as a limited partner and account executive at Bear Stearns who...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In April 1981, Jeffrey Epstein testified before the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of an inquiry involving trading in St. Joe Minerals securities. Epstein described himself as a limited partner and account executive at Bear Stearns who assisted the sales force with commodities and financial-futures recommendations. The questioning focused heavily on his recent departure from the firm, his handling of client accounts and an incident in which he had loaned money to a close friend who used it in connection with a brokerage account. Epstein acknowledged making the loan but insisted it had not been concealed and said he had not initially understood that such an arrangement presented a regulatory problem.<br /><br />Epstein maintained that his resignation was unrelated to the St. Joe Minerals investigation and said he left because he was dissatisfied with how Bear Stearns handled the inquiry into the loan. He repeatedly denied discussing St. Joe Minerals with members of the firm’s executive committee and portrayed his departure as voluntary, submitting resignation letters dated March 12 and March 25. The testimony also revealed details about his rapid rise at Bear Stearns and his compensation: he said he had earned more than $200,000 the previous year, including a $135,000 bonus, and expected another sizable payment after leaving. Overall, the deposition showed Epstein defending his conduct, minimizing the seriousness of the loan arrangement and distancing his resignation from the securities matter under investigation.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.sec.gov/files/epstein-deposition-and-exhibits.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jeffrey Epstein Transcript and Exhibits</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>776</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Jeffrey Epstein And The Transcript From His 1981 SEC Deposition (Part 1) (7/28/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/jeffrey-epstein-and-the-transcript-from-his-1981-sec-deposition-part-1-7-28-26--73196950</link><description><![CDATA[In April 1981, Jeffrey Epstein testified before the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of an inquiry involving trading in St. Joe Minerals securities. Epstein described himself as a limited partner and account executive at Bear Stearns who assisted the sales force with commodities and financial-futures recommendations. The questioning focused heavily on his recent departure from the firm, his handling of client accounts and an incident in which he had loaned money to a close friend who used it in connection with a brokerage account. Epstein acknowledged making the loan but insisted it had not been concealed and said he had not initially understood that such an arrangement presented a regulatory problem.<br /><br />Epstein maintained that his resignation was unrelated to the St. Joe Minerals investigation and said he left because he was dissatisfied with how Bear Stearns handled the inquiry into the loan. He repeatedly denied discussing St. Joe Minerals with members of the firm’s executive committee and portrayed his departure as voluntary, submitting resignation letters dated March 12 and March 25. The testimony also revealed details about his rapid rise at Bear Stearns and his compensation: he said he had earned more than $200,000 the previous year, including a $135,000 bonus, and expected another sizable payment after leaving. Overall, the deposition showed Epstein defending his conduct, minimizing the seriousness of the loan arrangement and distancing his resignation from the securities matter under investigation.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.sec.gov/files/epstein-deposition-and-exhibits.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jeffrey Epstein Transcript and Exhibits</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73196950</guid><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 18:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73196950/epsteinsecdeposition1.mp3" length="14374078" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b04bdcf3-4c5f-45ce-be0d-c5bfafb1fb3b/b04bdcf3-4c5f-45ce-be0d-c5bfafb1fb3b.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b04bdcf3-4c5f-45ce-be0d-c5bfafb1fb3b/b04bdcf3-4c5f-45ce-be0d-c5bfafb1fb3b.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b04bdcf3-4c5f-45ce-be0d-c5bfafb1fb3b/b04bdcf3-4c5f-45ce-be0d-c5bfafb1fb3b.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In April 1981, Jeffrey Epstein testified before the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of an inquiry involving trading in St. Joe Minerals securities. Epstein described himself as a limited partner and account executive at Bear Stearns who...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In April 1981, Jeffrey Epstein testified before the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of an inquiry involving trading in St. Joe Minerals securities. Epstein described himself as a limited partner and account executive at Bear Stearns who assisted the sales force with commodities and financial-futures recommendations. The questioning focused heavily on his recent departure from the firm, his handling of client accounts and an incident in which he had loaned money to a close friend who used it in connection with a brokerage account. Epstein acknowledged making the loan but insisted it had not been concealed and said he had not initially understood that such an arrangement presented a regulatory problem.<br /><br />Epstein maintained that his resignation was unrelated to the St. Joe Minerals investigation and said he left because he was dissatisfied with how Bear Stearns handled the inquiry into the loan. He repeatedly denied discussing St. Joe Minerals with members of the firm’s executive committee and portrayed his departure as voluntary, submitting resignation letters dated March 12 and March 25. The testimony also revealed details about his rapid rise at Bear Stearns and his compensation: he said he had earned more than $200,000 the previous year, including a $135,000 bonus, and expected another sizable payment after leaving. Overall, the deposition showed Epstein defending his conduct, minimizing the seriousness of the loan arrangement and distancing his resignation from the securities matter under investigation.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.sec.gov/files/epstein-deposition-and-exhibits.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jeffrey Epstein Transcript and Exhibits</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>899</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Murder In Moscow:  Bryan Kohberger Claims Innocence After Pleading Guilty (7/28/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-bryan-kohberger-claims-innocence-after-pleading-guilty-7-28-26--73217378</link><description><![CDATA[Almost 13 months after pleading guilty to murdering University of Idaho students Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, Bryan Kohberger filed a handwritten petition seeking to withdraw his plea and obtain post-conviction relief. Kohberger now claims he is innocent and alleges that his defense attorneys pressured him into “falsely confessing” through coercion, false promises, misleading information about the death penalty and the withholding of potentially exculpatory evidence. He specifically claimed his attorneys failed to tell him about unknown hair reportedly found in Ethan Chapin’s hands, advised him that actual guilt was not important to the plea decision and exaggerated the conditions he would face on Idaho’s death row.<br /><br />Kohberger’s new claims directly conflict with what he told Judge Steven Hippler under oath in July 2025, when he said he was satisfied with his attorneys, was pleading guilty voluntarily and admitted committing the burglary and four murders. His plea agreement spared him a possible death sentence in exchange for four consecutive life sentences without parole and a waiver of most appeal rights, although he can still pursue certain claims of ineffective legal representation through post-conviction proceedings. Idaho defense attorneys said overturning the plea would require Kohberger to clear a difficult legal threshold, and reopening the case could jeopardize the agreement that saved his life and potentially restore the possibility of capital prosecution.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.idahostatesman.com/news/local/crime/article316675205.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Idaho murderer Bryan Kohberger seeks post-conviction relief | Idaho Statesman</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73217378</guid><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73217378/kohbergerwantsnewtrial.mp3" length="10551841" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/549418da-88f8-4af2-b530-4f5981b65277/549418da-88f8-4af2-b530-4f5981b65277.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/549418da-88f8-4af2-b530-4f5981b65277/549418da-88f8-4af2-b530-4f5981b65277.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/549418da-88f8-4af2-b530-4f5981b65277/549418da-88f8-4af2-b530-4f5981b65277.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Almost 13 months after pleading guilty to murdering University of Idaho students Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, Bryan Kohberger filed a handwritten petition seeking to withdraw his plea and obtain post-conviction...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Almost 13 months after pleading guilty to murdering University of Idaho students Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, Bryan Kohberger filed a handwritten petition seeking to withdraw his plea and obtain post-conviction relief. Kohberger now claims he is innocent and alleges that his defense attorneys pressured him into “falsely confessing” through coercion, false promises, misleading information about the death penalty and the withholding of potentially exculpatory evidence. He specifically claimed his attorneys failed to tell him about unknown hair reportedly found in Ethan Chapin’s hands, advised him that actual guilt was not important to the plea decision and exaggerated the conditions he would face on Idaho’s death row.<br /><br />Kohberger’s new claims directly conflict with what he told Judge Steven Hippler under oath in July 2025, when he said he was satisfied with his attorneys, was pleading guilty voluntarily and admitted committing the burglary and four murders. His plea agreement spared him a possible death sentence in exchange for four consecutive life sentences without parole and a waiver of most appeal rights, although he can still pursue certain claims of ineffective legal representation through post-conviction proceedings. Idaho defense attorneys said overturning the plea would require Kohberger to clear a difficult legal threshold, and reopening the case could jeopardize the agreement that saved his life and potentially restore the possibility of capital prosecution.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.idahostatesman.com/news/local/crime/article316675205.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Idaho murderer Bryan Kohberger seeks post-conviction relief | Idaho Statesman</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>660</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodle</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Doug Band And His Epstein Related Congressional Transcript (Part 11) (7/28/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/doug-band-and-his-epstein-related-congressional-transcript-part-11-7-28-26--73195254</link><description><![CDATA[Doug Band told the House Oversight Committee that his personal contact with Jeffrey Epstein was limited, infrequent and largely incidental to his work as Bill Clinton’s longtime aide. He said he barely knew Epstein, did not recall receiving gifts from him and had no knowledge of Epstein’s abuse or other criminal conduct while they were acquainted. Band nevertheless described Epstein and Clinton as appearing to be friends, pointing to the time they spent together, Epstein’s aircraft and his potential value as a supporter of Clinton’s post-presidential work. He acknowledged accompanying Clinton on trips aboard Epstein’s plane and visiting Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse, but said he did not remember witnessing private conversations between the two men or seeing anything improper.<br /><br />Band described a more substantial relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, admitting that they developed a friendship through Clinton’s orbit while firmly denying that it was ever romantic or physical. He said he began hearing troubling reports about Maxwell around 2011 and responded by removing her from Clinton’s contact lists and attempting to cut her out of the former president’s world. Much of the questioning focused on emails suggesting social familiarity, dinners, travel arrangements, birthday plans and flirtatious language, but Band repeatedly said he could not remember the communications or the events being discussed. His testimony therefore presented Epstein as a peripheral acquaintance and Maxwell as a former friend, while leaving lawmakers with numerous instances in which documentary records appeared more detailed than Band’s recollection.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73195254</guid><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73195254/bandtranscripts11.mp3" length="14673755" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0a40c48a-46f6-4b5e-be20-441613ff52dd/0a40c48a-46f6-4b5e-be20-441613ff52dd.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0a40c48a-46f6-4b5e-be20-441613ff52dd/0a40c48a-46f6-4b5e-be20-441613ff52dd.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0a40c48a-46f6-4b5e-be20-441613ff52dd/0a40c48a-46f6-4b5e-be20-441613ff52dd.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Doug Band told the House Oversight Committee that his personal contact with Jeffrey Epstein was limited, infrequent and largely incidental to his work as Bill Clinton’s longtime aide. He said he barely knew Epstein, did not recall receiving gifts from...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Doug Band told the House Oversight Committee that his personal contact with Jeffrey Epstein was limited, infrequent and largely incidental to his work as Bill Clinton’s longtime aide. He said he barely knew Epstein, did not recall receiving gifts from him and had no knowledge of Epstein’s abuse or other criminal conduct while they were acquainted. Band nevertheless described Epstein and Clinton as appearing to be friends, pointing to the time they spent together, Epstein’s aircraft and his potential value as a supporter of Clinton’s post-presidential work. He acknowledged accompanying Clinton on trips aboard Epstein’s plane and visiting Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse, but said he did not remember witnessing private conversations between the two men or seeing anything improper.<br /><br />Band described a more substantial relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, admitting that they developed a friendship through Clinton’s orbit while firmly denying that it was ever romantic or physical. He said he began hearing troubling reports about Maxwell around 2011 and responded by removing her from Clinton’s contact lists and attempting to cut her out of the former president’s world. Much of the questioning focused on emails suggesting social familiarity, dinners, travel arrangements, birthday plans and flirtatious language, but Band repeatedly said he could not remember the communications or the events being discussed. His testimony therefore presented Epstein as a peripheral acquaintance and Maxwell as a former friend, while leaving lawmakers with numerous instances in which documentary records appeared more detailed than Band’s recollection.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>918</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Doug Band And His Epstein Related Congressional Transcript (Part 10) (7/27/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/doug-band-and-his-epstein-related-congressional-transcript-part-10-7-27-26--73195253</link><description><![CDATA[Doug Band told the House Oversight Committee that his personal contact with Jeffrey Epstein was limited, infrequent and largely incidental to his work as Bill Clinton’s longtime aide. He said he barely knew Epstein, did not recall receiving gifts from him and had no knowledge of Epstein’s abuse or other criminal conduct while they were acquainted. Band nevertheless described Epstein and Clinton as appearing to be friends, pointing to the time they spent together, Epstein’s aircraft and his potential value as a supporter of Clinton’s post-presidential work. He acknowledged accompanying Clinton on trips aboard Epstein’s plane and visiting Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse, but said he did not remember witnessing private conversations between the two men or seeing anything improper.<br /><br />Band described a more substantial relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, admitting that they developed a friendship through Clinton’s orbit while firmly denying that it was ever romantic or physical. He said he began hearing troubling reports about Maxwell around 2011 and responded by removing her from Clinton’s contact lists and attempting to cut her out of the former president’s world. Much of the questioning focused on emails suggesting social familiarity, dinners, travel arrangements, birthday plans and flirtatious language, but Band repeatedly said he could not remember the communications or the events being discussed. His testimony therefore presented Epstein as a peripheral acquaintance and Maxwell as a former friend, while leaving lawmakers with numerous instances in which documentary records appeared more detailed than Band’s recollection.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73195253</guid><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73195253/bandtranscripts10.mp3" length="13574104" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/22fca62d-692a-4736-a39a-ba70d7d71cb8/22fca62d-692a-4736-a39a-ba70d7d71cb8.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/22fca62d-692a-4736-a39a-ba70d7d71cb8/22fca62d-692a-4736-a39a-ba70d7d71cb8.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/22fca62d-692a-4736-a39a-ba70d7d71cb8/22fca62d-692a-4736-a39a-ba70d7d71cb8.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Doug Band told the House Oversight Committee that his personal contact with Jeffrey Epstein was limited, infrequent and largely incidental to his work as Bill Clinton’s longtime aide. He said he barely knew Epstein, did not recall receiving gifts from...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Doug Band told the House Oversight Committee that his personal contact with Jeffrey Epstein was limited, infrequent and largely incidental to his work as Bill Clinton’s longtime aide. He said he barely knew Epstein, did not recall receiving gifts from him and had no knowledge of Epstein’s abuse or other criminal conduct while they were acquainted. Band nevertheless described Epstein and Clinton as appearing to be friends, pointing to the time they spent together, Epstein’s aircraft and his potential value as a supporter of Clinton’s post-presidential work. He acknowledged accompanying Clinton on trips aboard Epstein’s plane and visiting Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse, but said he did not remember witnessing private conversations between the two men or seeing anything improper.<br /><br />Band described a more substantial relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, admitting that they developed a friendship through Clinton’s orbit while firmly denying that it was ever romantic or physical. He said he began hearing troubling reports about Maxwell around 2011 and responded by removing her from Clinton’s contact lists and attempting to cut her out of the former president’s world. Much of the questioning focused on emails suggesting social familiarity, dinners, travel arrangements, birthday plans and flirtatious language, but Band repeatedly said he could not remember the communications or the events being discussed. His testimony therefore presented Epstein as a peripheral acquaintance and Maxwell as a former friend, while leaving lawmakers with numerous instances in which documentary records appeared more detailed than Band’s recollection.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>849</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition: How The Federal Government Broke The Law When It Comes to Epstein And The CVRA (7/28/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-how-the-federal-government-broke-the-law-when-it-comes-to-epstein-and-the-cvra-7-28-26--73194643</link><description><![CDATA[The Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA) was supposed to guarantee fairness and transparency for victims—making sure they were informed, included, and respected in the legal process. But when Jeffrey Epstein came along, that promise evaporated. Federal prosecutors secretly cut a Non-Prosecution Agreement that protected not only Epstein but also his “potential co-conspirators,” violating the very law designed to stop such backroom deals. The victims weren’t told; they found out months later from the press. The same Department of Justice that preaches accountability deliberately hid the deal, broke federal law, and then argued that the CVRA didn’t apply because no federal charges were filed—an argument so twisted it turned their own crime into a loophole.<br /><br />Instead of punishment, Epstein got 13 months in county jail with daily work release, while the prosecutors who betrayed the victims got promotions. The courts sided with the government, ruling that since the feds never formally charged Epstein, the survivors technically weren’t “victims” under the CVRA. The result was a legal farce that showed how easily the system bends for the powerful. The law that was supposed to protect victims ended up protecting predators, proving once again that in America, justice isn’t blind—it just looks away when the wrong people are involved.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73194643</guid><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73194643/megacvra.mp3" length="26576814" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/79d6d603-17d1-4319-ad62-a194cd26cad3/79d6d603-17d1-4319-ad62-a194cd26cad3.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/79d6d603-17d1-4319-ad62-a194cd26cad3/79d6d603-17d1-4319-ad62-a194cd26cad3.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/79d6d603-17d1-4319-ad62-a194cd26cad3/79d6d603-17d1-4319-ad62-a194cd26cad3.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA) was supposed to guarantee fairness and transparency for victims—making sure they were informed, included, and respected in the legal process. But when Jeffrey Epstein came along, that promise evaporated. Federal...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA) was supposed to guarantee fairness and transparency for victims—making sure they were informed, included, and respected in the legal process. But when Jeffrey Epstein came along, that promise evaporated. Federal prosecutors secretly cut a Non-Prosecution Agreement that protected not only Epstein but also his “potential co-conspirators,” violating the very law designed to stop such backroom deals. The victims weren’t told; they found out months later from the press. The same Department of Justice that preaches accountability deliberately hid the deal, broke federal law, and then argued that the CVRA didn’t apply because no federal charges were filed—an argument so twisted it turned their own crime into a loophole.<br /><br />Instead of punishment, Epstein got 13 months in county jail with daily work release, while the prosecutors who betrayed the victims got promotions. The courts sided with the government, ruling that since the feds never formally charged Epstein, the survivors technically weren’t “victims” under the CVRA. The result was a legal farce that showed how easily the system bends for the powerful. The law that was supposed to protect victims ended up protecting predators, proving once again that in America, justice isn’t blind—it just looks away when the wrong people are involved.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1662</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega  Edition:   Howard Lutnick And The Jersey Boys Scandal (7/28/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-howard-lutnick-and-the-jersey-boys-scandal-7-28-26--73194642</link><description><![CDATA[In 2011, Cantor Gaming stormed into Las Vegas with the swagger of Wall Street, led by Howard Lutnick at the helm of the parent company Cantor Fitzgerald and Lee Amaitis running the Nevada operation. Known for pioneering mobile sports wagering and accepting unprecedented high-limit bets—sometimes as large as $500,000—Cantor positioned itself as the cutting edge of sports gaming. To many, it looked like a revolution: bettors flocked to its books at the M Resort and beyond, drawn by the promise of action other operators wouldn’t touch. But behind the gloss of innovation, Cantor became entangled in one of the largest illegal betting scandals in modern history. The so-called “Jersey Boys,” an East Coast ring with deep ties to organized bookmaking, infiltrated the operation through Cantor executive Michael “The Computer” Colbert. With Colbert as their insider, the crew laundered millions through Cantor’s system, exploiting the company’s appetite for volume and its disregard for traditional risk limits.<br /><br /><br />The scheme collapsed in 2012 when Colbert and more than two dozen associates were arrested in a sweeping FBI crackdown. Nevada regulators soon levied one of the largest fines in state history—$5.5 million—citing Cantor’s lack of oversight. Amaitis stepped down in 2016, his reputation scarred, while the Cantor brand itself was rebranded as CG Technology in a failed attempt to shed its baggage. By 2020, the company was sold to William Hill, its ambitions of dominating Las Vegas reduced to a cautionary tale. The Jersey Boys scandal not only crippled Cantor but reshaped the entire sports gaming industry, ushering in stricter compliance, tighter wagering oversight, and a lasting reminder that unchecked ambition and Wall Street arrogance could topple even the flashiest of innovators.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73194642</guid><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73194642/megalutnickjerseyboysgreatestblackmailer.mp3" length="35539949" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cbbd95f8-f098-4bb5-aa15-e3a543f4afed/cbbd95f8-f098-4bb5-aa15-e3a543f4afed.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cbbd95f8-f098-4bb5-aa15-e3a543f4afed/cbbd95f8-f098-4bb5-aa15-e3a543f4afed.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cbbd95f8-f098-4bb5-aa15-e3a543f4afed/cbbd95f8-f098-4bb5-aa15-e3a543f4afed.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In 2011, Cantor Gaming stormed into Las Vegas with the swagger of Wall Street, led by Howard Lutnick at the helm of the parent company Cantor Fitzgerald and Lee Amaitis running the Nevada operation. Known for pioneering mobile sports wagering and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In 2011, Cantor Gaming stormed into Las Vegas with the swagger of Wall Street, led by Howard Lutnick at the helm of the parent company Cantor Fitzgerald and Lee Amaitis running the Nevada operation. Known for pioneering mobile sports wagering and accepting unprecedented high-limit bets—sometimes as large as $500,000—Cantor positioned itself as the cutting edge of sports gaming. To many, it looked like a revolution: bettors flocked to its books at the M Resort and beyond, drawn by the promise of action other operators wouldn’t touch. But behind the gloss of innovation, Cantor became entangled in one of the largest illegal betting scandals in modern history. The so-called “Jersey Boys,” an East Coast ring with deep ties to organized bookmaking, infiltrated the operation through Cantor executive Michael “The Computer” Colbert. With Colbert as their insider, the crew laundered millions through Cantor’s system, exploiting the company’s appetite for volume and its disregard for traditional risk limits.<br /><br /><br />The scheme collapsed in 2012 when Colbert and more than two dozen associates were arrested in a sweeping FBI crackdown. Nevada regulators soon levied one of the largest fines in state history—$5.5 million—citing Cantor’s lack of oversight. Amaitis stepped down in 2016, his reputation scarred, while the Cantor brand itself was rebranded as CG Technology in a failed attempt to shed its baggage. By 2020, the company was sold to William Hill, its ambitions of dominating Las Vegas reduced to a cautionary tale. The Jersey Boys scandal not only crippled Cantor but reshaped the entire sports gaming industry, ushering in stricter compliance, tighter wagering oversight, and a lasting reminder that unchecked ambition and Wall Street arrogance could topple even the flashiest of innovators.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2222</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   Ghislaine Maxwell And Her Attempt To Fade Away From The Public (7/27/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-ghislaine-maxwell-and-her-attempt-to-fade-away-from-the-public-7-27-26--73194622</link><description><![CDATA[After Jeffrey Epstein’s arrest in July 2019, Ghislaine Maxwell seemed to vanish. Reporters, investigators, and even people who had once moved in her social circles said they did not know where she was living or how to reach her. She stopped appearing publicly, avoided the press, and reportedly moved between properties while using layers of privacy and security to keep her location hidden. As scrutiny intensified over her alleged role in Epstein’s abuse and trafficking operation, her disappearance created the impression that she had deliberately gone underground.<br /><br />The lack of confirmed sightings fueled widespread rumors that Maxwell was on the lam, possibly hiding overseas or receiving help from wealthy and influential friends. Speculation placed her everywhere from France and Israel to remote estates in the United States, but many of the claims were never substantiated. She was eventually arrested by the FBI in July 2020 at a secluded property in New Hampshire, where prosecutors said she had taken extensive steps to conceal her presence. Her arrest ended nearly a year of mystery and reinforced the belief that she had been actively trying to remain beyond the reach of authorities.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73194622</guid><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73194622/megathefbimaxwellhunt.mp3" length="54987590" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/637c5966-d254-4b96-b461-912763a25e06/637c5966-d254-4b96-b461-912763a25e06.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/637c5966-d254-4b96-b461-912763a25e06/637c5966-d254-4b96-b461-912763a25e06.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/637c5966-d254-4b96-b461-912763a25e06/637c5966-d254-4b96-b461-912763a25e06.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>After Jeffrey Epstein’s arrest in July 2019, Ghislaine Maxwell seemed to vanish. Reporters, investigators, and even people who had once moved in her social circles said they did not know where she was living or how to reach her. She stopped appearing...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[After Jeffrey Epstein’s arrest in July 2019, Ghislaine Maxwell seemed to vanish. Reporters, investigators, and even people who had once moved in her social circles said they did not know where she was living or how to reach her. She stopped appearing publicly, avoided the press, and reportedly moved between properties while using layers of privacy and security to keep her location hidden. As scrutiny intensified over her alleged role in Epstein’s abuse and trafficking operation, her disappearance created the impression that she had deliberately gone underground.<br /><br />The lack of confirmed sightings fueled widespread rumors that Maxwell was on the lam, possibly hiding overseas or receiving help from wealthy and influential friends. Speculation placed her everywhere from France and Israel to remote estates in the United States, but many of the claims were never substantiated. She was eventually arrested by the FBI in July 2020 at a secluded property in New Hampshire, where prosecutors said she had taken extensive steps to conceal her presence. Her arrest ended nearly a year of mystery and reinforced the belief that she had been actively trying to remain beyond the reach of authorities.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3437</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Brad Edwards And His Affidavit In Support Of Epstein Related Transparency By The DOJ (Part 4)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/brad-edwards-and-his-affidavit-in-support-of-epstein-related-transparency-by-the-doj-part-4--73195098</link><description><![CDATA[The affidavit submitted by attorney Bradley J. Edwards in the Southern District of Florida lays out a detailed argument for why the U.S. government should be compelled to produce documents related to the federal handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. Edwards, representing Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, explains that the requested records are essential to proving that federal prosecutors violated the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA) by secretly negotiating and finalizing Epstein’s 2007–2008 non-prosecution agreement without notifying the victims. He asserts that internal DOJ communications, emails, memoranda, and investigative records would show what prosecutors knew, when they knew it, and how deliberate their decision was to exclude victims from the process despite clear statutory obligations.<br /><br />Edwards further argues that the government’s resistance to producing these materials undermines transparency and prevents the court from fully evaluating the extent of the misconduct. He emphasizes that the victims cannot meaningfully litigate their CVRA claims without access to evidence exclusively in the government’s possession, particularly records documenting decision-making within the U.S. Attorney’s Office and DOJ headquarters. The affidavit frames the document production not as a fishing expedition, but as a narrowly tailored request necessary to expose how Epstein was granted extraordinary leniency, how victims were intentionally misled, and how federal officials acted with impunity while shielding both Epstein and themselves from accountability.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycacpucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.317867/gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.265.1_1.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.265.1_1.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73195098</guid><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73195098/bradedwardsaffidavit4.mp3" length="12250427" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/de541cef-59f2-4253-b889-42228d5abc63/de541cef-59f2-4253-b889-42228d5abc63.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/de541cef-59f2-4253-b889-42228d5abc63/de541cef-59f2-4253-b889-42228d5abc63.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/de541cef-59f2-4253-b889-42228d5abc63/de541cef-59f2-4253-b889-42228d5abc63.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The affidavit submitted by attorney Bradley J. Edwards in the Southern District of Florida lays out a detailed argument for why the U.S. government should be compelled to produce documents related to the federal handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The affidavit submitted by attorney Bradley J. Edwards in the Southern District of Florida lays out a detailed argument for why the U.S. government should be compelled to produce documents related to the federal handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. Edwards, representing Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, explains that the requested records are essential to proving that federal prosecutors violated the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA) by secretly negotiating and finalizing Epstein’s 2007–2008 non-prosecution agreement without notifying the victims. He asserts that internal DOJ communications, emails, memoranda, and investigative records would show what prosecutors knew, when they knew it, and how deliberate their decision was to exclude victims from the process despite clear statutory obligations.<br /><br />Edwards further argues that the government’s resistance to producing these materials undermines transparency and prevents the court from fully evaluating the extent of the misconduct. He emphasizes that the victims cannot meaningfully litigate their CVRA claims without access to evidence exclusively in the government’s possession, particularly records documenting decision-making within the U.S. Attorney’s Office and DOJ headquarters. The affidavit frames the document production not as a fishing expedition, but as a narrowly tailored request necessary to expose how Epstein was granted extraordinary leniency, how victims were intentionally misled, and how federal officials acted with impunity while shielding both Epstein and themselves from accountability.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycacpucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.317867/gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.265.1_1.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.265.1_1.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>766</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Brad Edwards And His Affidavit In Support Of Epstein Related Transparency By The DOJ (Part 3)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/brad-edwards-and-his-affidavit-in-support-of-epstein-related-transparency-by-the-doj-part-3--73195097</link><description><![CDATA[The affidavit submitted by attorney Bradley J. Edwards in the Southern District of Florida lays out a detailed argument for why the U.S. government should be compelled to produce documents related to the federal handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. Edwards, representing Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, explains that the requested records are essential to proving that federal prosecutors violated the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA) by secretly negotiating and finalizing Epstein’s 2007–2008 non-prosecution agreement without notifying the victims. He asserts that internal DOJ communications, emails, memoranda, and investigative records would show what prosecutors knew, when they knew it, and how deliberate their decision was to exclude victims from the process despite clear statutory obligations.<br /><br />Edwards further argues that the government’s resistance to producing these materials undermines transparency and prevents the court from fully evaluating the extent of the misconduct. He emphasizes that the victims cannot meaningfully litigate their CVRA claims without access to evidence exclusively in the government’s possession, particularly records documenting decision-making within the U.S. Attorney’s Office and DOJ headquarters. The affidavit frames the document production not as a fishing expedition, but as a narrowly tailored request necessary to expose how Epstein was granted extraordinary leniency, how victims were intentionally misled, and how federal officials acted with impunity while shielding both Epstein and themselves from accountability.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycacpucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.317867/gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.265.1_1.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.265.1_1.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73195097</guid><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73195097/bradedwardscvra3.mp3" length="11666120" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cab784e3-1799-4b53-90d9-eca5e55af4a3/cab784e3-1799-4b53-90d9-eca5e55af4a3.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cab784e3-1799-4b53-90d9-eca5e55af4a3/cab784e3-1799-4b53-90d9-eca5e55af4a3.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cab784e3-1799-4b53-90d9-eca5e55af4a3/cab784e3-1799-4b53-90d9-eca5e55af4a3.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The affidavit submitted by attorney Bradley J. Edwards in the Southern District of Florida lays out a detailed argument for why the U.S. government should be compelled to produce documents related to the federal handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The affidavit submitted by attorney Bradley J. Edwards in the Southern District of Florida lays out a detailed argument for why the U.S. government should be compelled to produce documents related to the federal handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. Edwards, representing Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, explains that the requested records are essential to proving that federal prosecutors violated the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA) by secretly negotiating and finalizing Epstein’s 2007–2008 non-prosecution agreement without notifying the victims. He asserts that internal DOJ communications, emails, memoranda, and investigative records would show what prosecutors knew, when they knew it, and how deliberate their decision was to exclude victims from the process despite clear statutory obligations.<br /><br />Edwards further argues that the government’s resistance to producing these materials undermines transparency and prevents the court from fully evaluating the extent of the misconduct. He emphasizes that the victims cannot meaningfully litigate their CVRA claims without access to evidence exclusively in the government’s possession, particularly records documenting decision-making within the U.S. Attorney’s Office and DOJ headquarters. The affidavit frames the document production not as a fishing expedition, but as a narrowly tailored request necessary to expose how Epstein was granted extraordinary leniency, how victims were intentionally misled, and how federal officials acted with impunity while shielding both Epstein and themselves from accountability.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycacpucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.317867/gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.265.1_1.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.265.1_1.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>730</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Brad Edwards And His Affidavit In Support Of Epstein Related Transparency By The DOJ (Part 2)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/brad-edwards-and-his-affidavit-in-support-of-epstein-related-transparency-by-the-doj-part-2--73195081</link><description><![CDATA[The affidavit submitted by attorney Bradley J. Edwards in the Southern District of Florida lays out a detailed argument for why the U.S. government should be compelled to produce documents related to the federal handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. Edwards, representing Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, explains that the requested records are essential to proving that federal prosecutors violated the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA) by secretly negotiating and finalizing Epstein’s 2007–2008 non-prosecution agreement without notifying the victims. He asserts that internal DOJ communications, emails, memoranda, and investigative records would show what prosecutors knew, when they knew it, and how deliberate their decision was to exclude victims from the process despite clear statutory obligations.<br /><br />Edwards further argues that the government’s resistance to producing these materials undermines transparency and prevents the court from fully evaluating the extent of the misconduct. He emphasizes that the victims cannot meaningfully litigate their CVRA claims without access to evidence exclusively in the government’s possession, particularly records documenting decision-making within the U.S. Attorney’s Office and DOJ headquarters. The affidavit frames the document production not as a fishing expedition, but as a narrowly tailored request necessary to expose how Epstein was granted extraordinary leniency, how victims were intentionally misled, and how federal officials acted with impunity while shielding both Epstein and themselves from accountability.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycacpucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.317867/gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.265.1_1.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.265.1_1.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73195081</guid><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73195081/bradedwardscvraaffidavit2.mp3" length="11753056" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1318583e-97e5-4c7b-9ccf-70571b155a7c/1318583e-97e5-4c7b-9ccf-70571b155a7c.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1318583e-97e5-4c7b-9ccf-70571b155a7c/1318583e-97e5-4c7b-9ccf-70571b155a7c.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1318583e-97e5-4c7b-9ccf-70571b155a7c/1318583e-97e5-4c7b-9ccf-70571b155a7c.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The affidavit submitted by attorney Bradley J. Edwards in the Southern District of Florida lays out a detailed argument for why the U.S. government should be compelled to produce documents related to the federal handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The affidavit submitted by attorney Bradley J. Edwards in the Southern District of Florida lays out a detailed argument for why the U.S. government should be compelled to produce documents related to the federal handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. Edwards, representing Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, explains that the requested records are essential to proving that federal prosecutors violated the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA) by secretly negotiating and finalizing Epstein’s 2007–2008 non-prosecution agreement without notifying the victims. He asserts that internal DOJ communications, emails, memoranda, and investigative records would show what prosecutors knew, when they knew it, and how deliberate their decision was to exclude victims from the process despite clear statutory obligations.<br /><br />Edwards further argues that the government’s resistance to producing these materials undermines transparency and prevents the court from fully evaluating the extent of the misconduct. He emphasizes that the victims cannot meaningfully litigate their CVRA claims without access to evidence exclusively in the government’s possession, particularly records documenting decision-making within the U.S. Attorney’s Office and DOJ headquarters. The affidavit frames the document production not as a fishing expedition, but as a narrowly tailored request necessary to expose how Epstein was granted extraordinary leniency, how victims were intentionally misled, and how federal officials acted with impunity while shielding both Epstein and themselves from accountability.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycacpucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.317867/gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.265.1_1.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.265.1_1.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>735</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Brad Edwards And His Affidavit In Support Of Epstein Related Transparency By The DOJ (Part 1)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/brad-edwards-and-his-affidavit-in-support-of-epstein-related-transparency-by-the-doj-part-1--73195080</link><description><![CDATA[The affidavit submitted by attorney Bradley J. Edwards in the Southern District of Florida lays out a detailed argument for why the U.S. government should be compelled to produce documents related to the federal handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. Edwards, representing Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, explains that the requested records are essential to proving that federal prosecutors violated the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA) by secretly negotiating and finalizing Epstein’s 2007–2008 non-prosecution agreement without notifying the victims. He asserts that internal DOJ communications, emails, memoranda, and investigative records would show what prosecutors knew, when they knew it, and how deliberate their decision was to exclude victims from the process despite clear statutory obligations.<br /><br />Edwards further argues that the government’s resistance to producing these materials undermines transparency and prevents the court from fully evaluating the extent of the misconduct. He emphasizes that the victims cannot meaningfully litigate their CVRA claims without access to evidence exclusively in the government’s possession, particularly records documenting decision-making within the U.S. Attorney’s Office and DOJ headquarters. The affidavit frames the document production not as a fishing expedition, but as a narrowly tailored request necessary to expose how Epstein was granted extraordinary leniency, how victims were intentionally misled, and how federal officials acted with impunity while shielding both Epstein and themselves from accountability.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycacpucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.317867/gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.265.1_1.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.265.1_1.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73195080</guid><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 22:30:01 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73195080/bradedwardscvraaffidait1.mp3" length="11880533" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7960a4d2-25e3-49e7-9b12-c1b9b8aea9f2/7960a4d2-25e3-49e7-9b12-c1b9b8aea9f2.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7960a4d2-25e3-49e7-9b12-c1b9b8aea9f2/7960a4d2-25e3-49e7-9b12-c1b9b8aea9f2.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7960a4d2-25e3-49e7-9b12-c1b9b8aea9f2/7960a4d2-25e3-49e7-9b12-c1b9b8aea9f2.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The affidavit submitted by attorney Bradley J. Edwards in the Southern District of Florida lays out a detailed argument for why the U.S. government should be compelled to produce documents related to the federal handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The affidavit submitted by attorney Bradley J. Edwards in the Southern District of Florida lays out a detailed argument for why the U.S. government should be compelled to produce documents related to the federal handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. Edwards, representing Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, explains that the requested records are essential to proving that federal prosecutors violated the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA) by secretly negotiating and finalizing Epstein’s 2007–2008 non-prosecution agreement without notifying the victims. He asserts that internal DOJ communications, emails, memoranda, and investigative records would show what prosecutors knew, when they knew it, and how deliberate their decision was to exclude victims from the process despite clear statutory obligations.<br /><br />Edwards further argues that the government’s resistance to producing these materials undermines transparency and prevents the court from fully evaluating the extent of the misconduct. He emphasizes that the victims cannot meaningfully litigate their CVRA claims without access to evidence exclusively in the government’s possession, particularly records documenting decision-making within the U.S. Attorney’s Office and DOJ headquarters. The affidavit frames the document production not as a fishing expedition, but as a narrowly tailored request necessary to expose how Epstein was granted extraordinary leniency, how victims were intentionally misled, and how federal officials acted with impunity while shielding both Epstein and themselves from accountability.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycacpucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.317867/gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.265.1_1.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.265.1_1.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>743</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Doug Band And His Epstein Related Congressional Transcript (Part 9) (7/27/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/doug-band-and-his-epstein-related-congressional-transcript-part-9-7-27-26--73191096</link><description><![CDATA[Doug Band told the House Oversight Committee that his personal contact with Jeffrey Epstein was limited, infrequent and largely incidental to his work as Bill Clinton’s longtime aide. He said he barely knew Epstein, did not recall receiving gifts from him and had no knowledge of Epstein’s abuse or other criminal conduct while they were acquainted. Band nevertheless described Epstein and Clinton as appearing to be friends, pointing to the time they spent together, Epstein’s aircraft and his potential value as a supporter of Clinton’s post-presidential work. He acknowledged accompanying Clinton on trips aboard Epstein’s plane and visiting Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse, but said he did not remember witnessing private conversations between the two men or seeing anything improper.<br /><br />Band described a more substantial relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, admitting that they developed a friendship through Clinton’s orbit while firmly denying that it was ever romantic or physical. He said he began hearing troubling reports about Maxwell around 2011 and responded by removing her from Clinton’s contact lists and attempting to cut her out of the former president’s world. Much of the questioning focused on emails suggesting social familiarity, dinners, travel arrangements, birthday plans and flirtatious language, but Band repeatedly said he could not remember the communications or the events being discussed. His testimony therefore presented Epstein as a peripheral acquaintance and Maxwell as a former friend, while leaving lawmakers with numerous instances in which documentary records appeared more detailed than Band’s recollection.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73191096</guid><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73191096/bandtranscripts9.mp3" length="17805523" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/243885e0-c9f3-4627-be9c-729339255485/243885e0-c9f3-4627-be9c-729339255485.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/243885e0-c9f3-4627-be9c-729339255485/243885e0-c9f3-4627-be9c-729339255485.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/243885e0-c9f3-4627-be9c-729339255485/243885e0-c9f3-4627-be9c-729339255485.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Doug Band told the House Oversight Committee that his personal contact with Jeffrey Epstein was limited, infrequent and largely incidental to his work as Bill Clinton’s longtime aide. He said he barely knew Epstein, did not recall receiving gifts from...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Doug Band told the House Oversight Committee that his personal contact with Jeffrey Epstein was limited, infrequent and largely incidental to his work as Bill Clinton’s longtime aide. He said he barely knew Epstein, did not recall receiving gifts from him and had no knowledge of Epstein’s abuse or other criminal conduct while they were acquainted. Band nevertheless described Epstein and Clinton as appearing to be friends, pointing to the time they spent together, Epstein’s aircraft and his potential value as a supporter of Clinton’s post-presidential work. He acknowledged accompanying Clinton on trips aboard Epstein’s plane and visiting Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse, but said he did not remember witnessing private conversations between the two men or seeing anything improper.<br /><br />Band described a more substantial relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, admitting that they developed a friendship through Clinton’s orbit while firmly denying that it was ever romantic or physical. He said he began hearing troubling reports about Maxwell around 2011 and responded by removing her from Clinton’s contact lists and attempting to cut her out of the former president’s world. Much of the questioning focused on emails suggesting social familiarity, dinners, travel arrangements, birthday plans and flirtatious language, but Band repeatedly said he could not remember the communications or the events being discussed. His testimony therefore presented Epstein as a peripheral acquaintance and Maxwell as a former friend, while leaving lawmakers with numerous instances in which documentary records appeared more detailed than Band’s recollection.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1113</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Doug Band And His Epstein Related Congressional Transcript (Part 8) (7/27/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/doug-band-and-his-epstein-related-congressional-transcript-part-8-7-27-26--73191095</link><description><![CDATA[Doug Band told the House Oversight Committee that his personal contact with Jeffrey Epstein was limited, infrequent and largely incidental to his work as Bill Clinton’s longtime aide. He said he barely knew Epstein, did not recall receiving gifts from him and had no knowledge of Epstein’s abuse or other criminal conduct while they were acquainted. Band nevertheless described Epstein and Clinton as appearing to be friends, pointing to the time they spent together, Epstein’s aircraft and his potential value as a supporter of Clinton’s post-presidential work. He acknowledged accompanying Clinton on trips aboard Epstein’s plane and visiting Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse, but said he did not remember witnessing private conversations between the two men or seeing anything improper.<br /><br />Band described a more substantial relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, admitting that they developed a friendship through Clinton’s orbit while firmly denying that it was ever romantic or physical. He said he began hearing troubling reports about Maxwell around 2011 and responded by removing her from Clinton’s contact lists and attempting to cut her out of the former president’s world. Much of the questioning focused on emails suggesting social familiarity, dinners, travel arrangements, birthday plans and flirtatious language, but Band repeatedly said he could not remember the communications or the events being discussed. His testimony therefore presented Epstein as a peripheral acquaintance and Maxwell as a former friend, while leaving lawmakers with numerous instances in which documentary records appeared more detailed than Band’s recollection.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73191095</guid><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 18:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73191095/bandtranscripts8.mp3" length="13148204" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/222150b7-7cd0-4b5b-b672-027c98e17537/222150b7-7cd0-4b5b-b672-027c98e17537.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/222150b7-7cd0-4b5b-b672-027c98e17537/222150b7-7cd0-4b5b-b672-027c98e17537.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/222150b7-7cd0-4b5b-b672-027c98e17537/222150b7-7cd0-4b5b-b672-027c98e17537.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Doug Band told the House Oversight Committee that his personal contact with Jeffrey Epstein was limited, infrequent and largely incidental to his work as Bill Clinton’s longtime aide. He said he barely knew Epstein, did not recall receiving gifts from...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Doug Band told the House Oversight Committee that his personal contact with Jeffrey Epstein was limited, infrequent and largely incidental to his work as Bill Clinton’s longtime aide. He said he barely knew Epstein, did not recall receiving gifts from him and had no knowledge of Epstein’s abuse or other criminal conduct while they were acquainted. Band nevertheless described Epstein and Clinton as appearing to be friends, pointing to the time they spent together, Epstein’s aircraft and his potential value as a supporter of Clinton’s post-presidential work. He acknowledged accompanying Clinton on trips aboard Epstein’s plane and visiting Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse, but said he did not remember witnessing private conversations between the two men or seeing anything improper.<br /><br />Band described a more substantial relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, admitting that they developed a friendship through Clinton’s orbit while firmly denying that it was ever romantic or physical. He said he began hearing troubling reports about Maxwell around 2011 and responded by removing her from Clinton’s contact lists and attempting to cut her out of the former president’s world. Much of the questioning focused on emails suggesting social familiarity, dinners, travel arrangements, birthday plans and flirtatious language, but Band repeatedly said he could not remember the communications or the events being discussed. His testimony therefore presented Epstein as a peripheral acquaintance and Maxwell as a former friend, while leaving lawmakers with numerous instances in which documentary records appeared more detailed than Band’s recollection.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>822</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Todd Blanche, the Epstein Files and the Survivors Left Behind (7/27/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/todd-blanche-the-epstein-files-and-the-survivors-left-behind-7-27-26--73178340</link><description><![CDATA[Danielle Bensky argued that Todd Blanche is unfit to become attorney general because his handling of the Epstein files harmed survivors while doing little to expose or prosecute the people who enabled Epstein. She said the Justice Department released documents containing victims’ names, phone numbers, addresses and deeply personal details, even after survivors and their lawyers had identified information requiring protection. At the same time, she said the names of alleged abusers, facilitators and powerful Epstein associates remained heavily redacted. Bensky placed responsibility directly on Blanche, noting that former Attorney General Pam Bondi identified him as the official overseeing the document release.<br /><br />Bensky also accused Blanche of suppressing accountability by declaring there was insufficient evidence for additional prosecutions, despite survivor testimony and investigative leads contained in the files. She criticized him for refusing her repeated requests for a meeting for roughly nine months while spending nine hours interviewing Ghislaine Maxwell before Maxwell received a favorable prison transfer. According to Bensky, Blanche only hurriedly met with survivors after Republican Senator Thom Tillis threatened to withhold support for his confirmation, and the meeting offered no credible plan for further investigations or justice. She concluded that Blanche had treated survivors as political obstacles rather than crime victims and urged senators to reject his nomination.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/voices/2026/07/23/epstein-files-todd-blanche-attorney-general-disqualified/90995254007/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">I'm an Epstein survivor. Our Blanche meeting was a joke | Opinion</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73178340</guid><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73178340/benskyblanche.mp3" length="11208873" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3d6ce0b8-8311-4233-b6c0-bec657f7ccf1/3d6ce0b8-8311-4233-b6c0-bec657f7ccf1.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3d6ce0b8-8311-4233-b6c0-bec657f7ccf1/3d6ce0b8-8311-4233-b6c0-bec657f7ccf1.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3d6ce0b8-8311-4233-b6c0-bec657f7ccf1/3d6ce0b8-8311-4233-b6c0-bec657f7ccf1.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Danielle Bensky argued that Todd Blanche is unfit to become attorney general because his handling of the Epstein files harmed survivors while doing little to expose or prosecute the people who enabled Epstein. She said the Justice Department released...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Danielle Bensky argued that Todd Blanche is unfit to become attorney general because his handling of the Epstein files harmed survivors while doing little to expose or prosecute the people who enabled Epstein. She said the Justice Department released documents containing victims’ names, phone numbers, addresses and deeply personal details, even after survivors and their lawyers had identified information requiring protection. At the same time, she said the names of alleged abusers, facilitators and powerful Epstein associates remained heavily redacted. Bensky placed responsibility directly on Blanche, noting that former Attorney General Pam Bondi identified him as the official overseeing the document release.<br /><br />Bensky also accused Blanche of suppressing accountability by declaring there was insufficient evidence for additional prosecutions, despite survivor testimony and investigative leads contained in the files. She criticized him for refusing her repeated requests for a meeting for roughly nine months while spending nine hours interviewing Ghislaine Maxwell before Maxwell received a favorable prison transfer. According to Bensky, Blanche only hurriedly met with survivors after Republican Senator Thom Tillis threatened to withhold support for his confirmation, and the meeting offered no credible plan for further investigations or justice. She concluded that Blanche had treated survivors as political obstacles rather than crime victims and urged senators to reject his nomination.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/voices/2026/07/23/epstein-files-todd-blanche-attorney-general-disqualified/90995254007/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">I'm an Epstein survivor. Our Blanche meeting was a joke | Opinion</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>701</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Congress Presses Jes Staley on Epstein, Cash and “Snow White” (7/27/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/congress-presses-jes-staley-on-epstein-cash-and-snow-white-7-27-26--73178351</link><description><![CDATA[Former Barclays chief Jes Staley told the House Oversight Committee that he was unsure whether Jeffrey Epstein had introduced him to a woman dressed as Snow White, despite emails showing Staley referencing the Disney character. In a July 2010 exchange, Staley told Epstein to “say hi to Snow White” and, when Epstein asked which character he wanted next, replied, “Beauty and the Beast.” Staley reportedly maintained during the closed-door interview that he did not know what those messages referred to, while acknowledging that he had a consensual sexual relationship with one of Epstein’s assistants at an Epstein-linked apartment in New York.<br /><br />Staley also told the committee that he visited Epstein while Epstein was serving his Florida jail sentence following his 2008 conviction and that he saw Epstein regularly withdraw large amounts of cash from his JPMorgan accounts. Committee Chairman James Comer said internal discussions at JPMorgan showed concern that Epstein was a high-risk client, but Staley continued defending him. Staley claimed he ended contact with Epstein after becoming Barclays CEO in 2015, though his relationship with Epstein later triggered regulatory scrutiny, contributed to his 2021 resignation and resulted in him being banned from senior financial-management roles in Britain.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://nypost.com/2026/07/23/us-news/ex-barclays-chief-jes-staley-tells-house-panel-hes-unsure-he-met-woman-in-a-snow-white-costume-through-jeffrey-epstein-source/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ex-Barclays chief Jes Staley tells House panel he's 'unsure' he met woman in a Snow White costume through Jeffrey Epstein: source</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73178351</guid><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73178351/jesstaleygiveshistestimony.mp3" length="11605098" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/59bbaffb-93cc-4ac2-b099-154f992feddc/59bbaffb-93cc-4ac2-b099-154f992feddc.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/59bbaffb-93cc-4ac2-b099-154f992feddc/59bbaffb-93cc-4ac2-b099-154f992feddc.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/59bbaffb-93cc-4ac2-b099-154f992feddc/59bbaffb-93cc-4ac2-b099-154f992feddc.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Former Barclays chief Jes Staley told the House Oversight Committee that he was unsure whether Jeffrey Epstein had introduced him to a woman dressed as Snow White, despite emails showing Staley referencing the Disney character. In a July 2010...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Former Barclays chief Jes Staley told the House Oversight Committee that he was unsure whether Jeffrey Epstein had introduced him to a woman dressed as Snow White, despite emails showing Staley referencing the Disney character. In a July 2010 exchange, Staley told Epstein to “say hi to Snow White” and, when Epstein asked which character he wanted next, replied, “Beauty and the Beast.” Staley reportedly maintained during the closed-door interview that he did not know what those messages referred to, while acknowledging that he had a consensual sexual relationship with one of Epstein’s assistants at an Epstein-linked apartment in New York.<br /><br />Staley also told the committee that he visited Epstein while Epstein was serving his Florida jail sentence following his 2008 conviction and that he saw Epstein regularly withdraw large amounts of cash from his JPMorgan accounts. Committee Chairman James Comer said internal discussions at JPMorgan showed concern that Epstein was a high-risk client, but Staley continued defending him. Staley claimed he ended contact with Epstein after becoming Barclays CEO in 2015, though his relationship with Epstein later triggered regulatory scrutiny, contributed to his 2021 resignation and resulted in him being banned from senior financial-management roles in Britain.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://nypost.com/2026/07/23/us-news/ex-barclays-chief-jes-staley-tells-house-panel-hes-unsure-he-met-woman-in-a-snow-white-costume-through-jeffrey-epstein-source/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ex-Barclays chief Jes Staley tells House panel he's 'unsure' he met woman in a Snow White costume through Jeffrey Epstein: source</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>726</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Alan Dershowitz Lawyers Allegedly Advised Him Against Appearing In Front Of Congress (7/27/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/alan-dershowitz-lawyers-allegedly-advised-him-against-appearing-in-front-of-congress-7-27-26--73178341</link><description><![CDATA[Alan Dershowitz had publicly declared that he was eager to appear before the House Oversight Committee, claiming he had “nothing to hide” and was prepared to answer questions under oath about Jeffrey Epstein. The committee sought his testimony because Dershowitz was a member of Epstein’s legal team, helped negotiate the extraordinarily lenient resolution of the Florida investigation and has repeatedly claimed to possess substantial information about Epstein and his associates. Dershowitz initially agreed to a videotaped, transcribed interview scheduled for July 20, 2026, but abruptly withdrew after his attorneys instructed him that he was not permitted to testify about the matters under investigation.<br /><br />Neither Dershowitz nor his lawyers publicly explained what legal issue supposedly prevented his appearance, despite repeated requests from congressional staff for clarification. Committee Chairman James Comer called the refusal unacceptable, contrasting Dershowitz’s withdrawal with his months of media appearances demanding transparency and volunteering to testify. Comer rescheduled the interview for September 2 and warned that the committee could subpoena Dershowitz if he refuses again, raising questions about why a man who repeatedly insisted he wanted to tell Congress everything suddenly retreated once an actual appearance was arranged.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2026/7/18/dershowitz-epstein-testimony/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Dershowitz Told By Attorneys He Cannot Legally Testify on Epstein Ties | News | The Harvard Crimson</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73178341</guid><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73178341/dershlawyerstoldhimnocongressappearance.mp3" length="10120507" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4ff6d8ce-07f2-418a-8f42-5f7d21f616e1/4ff6d8ce-07f2-418a-8f42-5f7d21f616e1.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4ff6d8ce-07f2-418a-8f42-5f7d21f616e1/4ff6d8ce-07f2-418a-8f42-5f7d21f616e1.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4ff6d8ce-07f2-418a-8f42-5f7d21f616e1/4ff6d8ce-07f2-418a-8f42-5f7d21f616e1.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Alan Dershowitz had publicly declared that he was eager to appear before the House Oversight Committee, claiming he had “nothing to hide” and was prepared to answer questions under oath about Jeffrey Epstein. The committee sought his testimony because...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Alan Dershowitz had publicly declared that he was eager to appear before the House Oversight Committee, claiming he had “nothing to hide” and was prepared to answer questions under oath about Jeffrey Epstein. The committee sought his testimony because Dershowitz was a member of Epstein’s legal team, helped negotiate the extraordinarily lenient resolution of the Florida investigation and has repeatedly claimed to possess substantial information about Epstein and his associates. Dershowitz initially agreed to a videotaped, transcribed interview scheduled for July 20, 2026, but abruptly withdrew after his attorneys instructed him that he was not permitted to testify about the matters under investigation.<br /><br />Neither Dershowitz nor his lawyers publicly explained what legal issue supposedly prevented his appearance, despite repeated requests from congressional staff for clarification. Committee Chairman James Comer called the refusal unacceptable, contrasting Dershowitz’s withdrawal with his months of media appearances demanding transparency and volunteering to testify. Comer rescheduled the interview for September 2 and warned that the committee could subpoena Dershowitz if he refuses again, raising questions about why a man who repeatedly insisted he wanted to tell Congress everything suddenly retreated once an actual appearance was arranged.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2026/7/18/dershowitz-epstein-testimony/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Dershowitz Told By Attorneys He Cannot Legally Testify on Epstein Ties | News | The Harvard Crimson</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>633</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition: The Reconstruction Of The Epstein Psychology Profile (7/27/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-reconstruction-of-the-epstein-psychology-profile-7-27-26--73177457</link><description><![CDATA[In the memorandum responding to the psychological reconstruction of inmate Jeffrey Epstein dated September 17, 2019, MCC New York Warden J. Petrucci addressed findings related to Epstein’s mental state and the events leading up to his death while housed in the Special Housing Unit. The response reviewed Epstein’s custody status, the decision to remove him from suicide watch, and the psychological assessments conducted by staff prior to his death. According to the institutional response, medical and psychological personnel had evaluated Epstein after an earlier incident in July 2019 and later determined that he did not meet the criteria to remain on suicide watch. Instead, he was placed under psychological observation, which carried fewer monitoring requirements than full suicide watch. The memorandum emphasized that clinical staff believed Epstein was stable enough to be removed from the more restrictive monitoring status and that the decision was based on the professional judgment of mental health personnel following their evaluation.<br /><br />Petrucci’s response also addressed operational procedures within the Special Housing Unit and how those procedures were supposed to function during Epstein’s detention. The memorandum stated that once Epstein was removed from suicide watch, responsibility for routine monitoring shifted back to standard correctional procedures, including regular counts and welfare checks conducted by correctional officers. The response acknowledged that those required checks were not properly carried out during the overnight shift preceding Epstein’s death and that logbook entries later proved to be inaccurate. While the psychological reconstruction attempted to analyze Epstein’s mental condition and possible motivations, the institutional response focused on clarifying the decisions made by staff and explaining the custody status under which Epstein was being housed at the time. The memorandum ultimately framed the removal from suicide watch as a clinical decision made by mental health professionals, while noting that subsequent failures in required monitoring procedures occurred during the final hours before Epstein was found unresponsive in his cell.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00048963.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00048963.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73177457</guid><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73177457/megaepsteinpsychological.mp3" length="45223645" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f47f0c2a-e9c1-4cc2-9231-fb1d5d6abde2/f47f0c2a-e9c1-4cc2-9231-fb1d5d6abde2.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f47f0c2a-e9c1-4cc2-9231-fb1d5d6abde2/f47f0c2a-e9c1-4cc2-9231-fb1d5d6abde2.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f47f0c2a-e9c1-4cc2-9231-fb1d5d6abde2/f47f0c2a-e9c1-4cc2-9231-fb1d5d6abde2.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In the memorandum responding to the psychological reconstruction of inmate Jeffrey Epstein dated September 17, 2019, MCC New York Warden J. Petrucci addressed findings related to Epstein’s mental state and the events leading up to his death while...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In the memorandum responding to the psychological reconstruction of inmate Jeffrey Epstein dated September 17, 2019, MCC New York Warden J. Petrucci addressed findings related to Epstein’s mental state and the events leading up to his death while housed in the Special Housing Unit. The response reviewed Epstein’s custody status, the decision to remove him from suicide watch, and the psychological assessments conducted by staff prior to his death. According to the institutional response, medical and psychological personnel had evaluated Epstein after an earlier incident in July 2019 and later determined that he did not meet the criteria to remain on suicide watch. Instead, he was placed under psychological observation, which carried fewer monitoring requirements than full suicide watch. The memorandum emphasized that clinical staff believed Epstein was stable enough to be removed from the more restrictive monitoring status and that the decision was based on the professional judgment of mental health personnel following their evaluation.<br /><br />Petrucci’s response also addressed operational procedures within the Special Housing Unit and how those procedures were supposed to function during Epstein’s detention. The memorandum stated that once Epstein was removed from suicide watch, responsibility for routine monitoring shifted back to standard correctional procedures, including regular counts and welfare checks conducted by correctional officers. The response acknowledged that those required checks were not properly carried out during the overnight shift preceding Epstein’s death and that logbook entries later proved to be inaccurate. While the psychological reconstruction attempted to analyze Epstein’s mental condition and possible motivations, the institutional response focused on clarifying the decisions made by staff and explaining the custody status under which Epstein was being housed at the time. The memorandum ultimately framed the removal from suicide watch as a clinical decision made by mental health professionals, while noting that subsequent failures in required monitoring procedures occurred during the final hours before Epstein was found unresponsive in his cell.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00048963.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00048963.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2827</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   The Testimony Of The Electrical Engineer From MCC (5-8) (7/27/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-testimony-of-the-electrical-engineer-from-mcc-5-8-7-27-26--73177456</link><description><![CDATA[The document is a sworn statement from an electrical engineer assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York, given in the aftermath of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. In his testimony, the engineer outlines the condition and functionality of the facility’s electrical and surveillance infrastructure, specifically addressing whether any power failures or technical malfunctions could have impacted the operation of cameras or monitoring systems on the night Epstein died. He indicates that, based on his review and knowledge of the systems, there were no significant electrical outages or systemic failures that would have disabled the cameras covering Epstein’s housing unit during the relevant timeframe. His statement is meant to clarify that the infrastructure itself was not compromised by a power-related issue.<br /><br />The engineer further explains how the MCC’s surveillance systems were designed to operate, including backup power measures and redundancies intended to keep critical systems running even in the event of localized disruptions. His account suggests that if cameras were not recording or footage was unavailable, the cause would likely not be attributable to an electrical failure but rather to other factors, such as equipment issues, configuration problems, or human involvement. In the broader context, this sworn statement undercuts the notion that a simple technical malfunction explains the lack of usable surveillance footage, instead reinforcing the unresolved questions surrounding how monitoring systems failed at such a critical moment.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00064043.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00064043.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73177456</guid><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73177456/megamccengineer5n6n7n8.mp3" length="49604275" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8a916fed-f68c-4382-b4b9-b15ab5d4c1d1/8a916fed-f68c-4382-b4b9-b15ab5d4c1d1.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8a916fed-f68c-4382-b4b9-b15ab5d4c1d1/8a916fed-f68c-4382-b4b9-b15ab5d4c1d1.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8a916fed-f68c-4382-b4b9-b15ab5d4c1d1/8a916fed-f68c-4382-b4b9-b15ab5d4c1d1.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The document is a sworn statement from an electrical engineer assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York, given in the aftermath of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. In his testimony, the engineer outlines the condition and functionality of...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The document is a sworn statement from an electrical engineer assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York, given in the aftermath of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. In his testimony, the engineer outlines the condition and functionality of the facility’s electrical and surveillance infrastructure, specifically addressing whether any power failures or technical malfunctions could have impacted the operation of cameras or monitoring systems on the night Epstein died. He indicates that, based on his review and knowledge of the systems, there were no significant electrical outages or systemic failures that would have disabled the cameras covering Epstein’s housing unit during the relevant timeframe. His statement is meant to clarify that the infrastructure itself was not compromised by a power-related issue.<br /><br />The engineer further explains how the MCC’s surveillance systems were designed to operate, including backup power measures and redundancies intended to keep critical systems running even in the event of localized disruptions. His account suggests that if cameras were not recording or footage was unavailable, the cause would likely not be attributable to an electrical failure but rather to other factors, such as equipment issues, configuration problems, or human involvement. In the broader context, this sworn statement undercuts the notion that a simple technical malfunction explains the lack of usable surveillance footage, instead reinforcing the unresolved questions surrounding how monitoring systems failed at such a critical moment.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00064043.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00064043.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3101</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   The Testimony Of The Electrical Engineer From MCC (1-4) (7/26/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-testimony-of-the-electrical-engineer-from-mcc-1-4-7-26-26--73177455</link><description><![CDATA[The document is a sworn statement from an electrical engineer assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York, given in the aftermath of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. In his testimony, the engineer outlines the condition and functionality of the facility’s electrical and surveillance infrastructure, specifically addressing whether any power failures or technical malfunctions could have impacted the operation of cameras or monitoring systems on the night Epstein died. He indicates that, based on his review and knowledge of the systems, there were no significant electrical outages or systemic failures that would have disabled the cameras covering Epstein’s housing unit during the relevant timeframe. His statement is meant to clarify that the infrastructure itself was not compromised by a power-related issue.<br /><br />The engineer further explains how the MCC’s surveillance systems were designed to operate, including backup power measures and redundancies intended to keep critical systems running even in the event of localized disruptions. His account suggests that if cameras were not recording or footage was unavailable, the cause would likely not be attributable to an electrical failure but rather to other factors, such as equipment issues, configuration problems, or human involvement. In the broader context, this sworn statement undercuts the notion that a simple technical malfunction explains the lack of usable surveillance footage, instead reinforcing the unresolved questions surrounding how monitoring systems failed at such a critical moment.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00064043.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00064043.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73177455</guid><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73177455/megamccengineer1n2n3n4.mp3" length="48848605" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/90855719-624a-4c5e-94fe-56fcba6b266f/90855719-624a-4c5e-94fe-56fcba6b266f.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/90855719-624a-4c5e-94fe-56fcba6b266f/90855719-624a-4c5e-94fe-56fcba6b266f.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/90855719-624a-4c5e-94fe-56fcba6b266f/90855719-624a-4c5e-94fe-56fcba6b266f.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The document is a sworn statement from an electrical engineer assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York, given in the aftermath of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. In his testimony, the engineer outlines the condition and functionality of...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The document is a sworn statement from an electrical engineer assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York, given in the aftermath of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. In his testimony, the engineer outlines the condition and functionality of the facility’s electrical and surveillance infrastructure, specifically addressing whether any power failures or technical malfunctions could have impacted the operation of cameras or monitoring systems on the night Epstein died. He indicates that, based on his review and knowledge of the systems, there were no significant electrical outages or systemic failures that would have disabled the cameras covering Epstein’s housing unit during the relevant timeframe. His statement is meant to clarify that the infrastructure itself was not compromised by a power-related issue.<br /><br />The engineer further explains how the MCC’s surveillance systems were designed to operate, including backup power measures and redundancies intended to keep critical systems running even in the event of localized disruptions. His account suggests that if cameras were not recording or footage was unavailable, the cause would likely not be attributable to an electrical failure but rather to other factors, such as equipment issues, configuration problems, or human involvement. In the broader context, this sworn statement undercuts the notion that a simple technical malfunction explains the lack of usable surveillance footage, instead reinforcing the unresolved questions surrounding how monitoring systems failed at such a critical moment.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00064043.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00064043.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3054</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Johanna Sjoberg's Deposition In The Maxwell/Virginia Roberts Suit (Part 10)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/johanna-sjoberg-s-deposition-in-the-maxwell-virginia-roberts-suit-part-10--73134322</link><description><![CDATA[In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.<br /><br /><br />Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein’s company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein’s residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg’s deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73134322</guid><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73134322/sjodepoprt10.mp3" length="8972373" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/26405930-f520-42c3-a06c-f4c944348a66/26405930-f520-42c3-a06c-f4c944348a66.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/26405930-f520-42c3-a06c-f4c944348a66/26405930-f520-42c3-a06c-f4c944348a66.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/26405930-f520-42c3-a06c-f4c944348a66/26405930-f520-42c3-a06c-f4c944348a66.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.<br /><br /><br />Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein’s company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein’s residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg’s deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>561</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Johanna Sjoberg's Deposition In The Maxwell/Virginia Roberts Suit (Part 9)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/johanna-sjoberg-s-deposition-in-the-maxwell-virginia-roberts-suit-part-9--73134327</link><description><![CDATA[In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.<br /><br /><br />Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein’s company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein’s residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg’s deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73134327</guid><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73134327/sjodepoprt9.mp3" length="13066702" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/283d4620-87d7-4593-9415-dde6b62bbe37/283d4620-87d7-4593-9415-dde6b62bbe37.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/283d4620-87d7-4593-9415-dde6b62bbe37/283d4620-87d7-4593-9415-dde6b62bbe37.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/283d4620-87d7-4593-9415-dde6b62bbe37/283d4620-87d7-4593-9415-dde6b62bbe37.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.<br /><br /><br />Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein’s company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein’s residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg’s deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>817</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Johanna Sjoberg's Deposition In The Maxwell/Virginia Roberts Suit (Part 8)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/johanna-sjoberg-s-deposition-in-the-maxwell-virginia-roberts-suit-part-8--73134325</link><description><![CDATA[In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.<br /><br /><br />Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein’s company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein’s residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg’s deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73134325</guid><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73134325/sjodepoprt8.mp3" length="14903214" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0f42ce32-f3e3-4642-9a44-041d44a73495/0f42ce32-f3e3-4642-9a44-041d44a73495.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0f42ce32-f3e3-4642-9a44-041d44a73495/0f42ce32-f3e3-4642-9a44-041d44a73495.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0f42ce32-f3e3-4642-9a44-041d44a73495/0f42ce32-f3e3-4642-9a44-041d44a73495.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.<br /><br /><br />Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein’s company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein’s residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg’s deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>932</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Transcripts From The Hearing Dealing With Tyler Robinson’s Courtroom Appearance (Part 1) (7/25/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/transcripts-from-the-hearing-dealing-with-tyler-robinson-s-courtroom-appearance-part-1-7-25-26--73170247</link><description><![CDATA[The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson’s request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.<br /><br />Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff’s office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk’s shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff’s office’s filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Monday<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2025/12/tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73170247</guid><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73170247/robinsonhearingtranscript1.mp3" length="11626414" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/258b1300-83df-4a0c-9d5e-cd0e5b70d95c/258b1300-83df-4a0c-9d5e-cd0e5b70d95c.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/258b1300-83df-4a0c-9d5e-cd0e5b70d95c/258b1300-83df-4a0c-9d5e-cd0e5b70d95c.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/258b1300-83df-4a0c-9d5e-cd0e5b70d95c/258b1300-83df-4a0c-9d5e-cd0e5b70d95c.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson’s request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson’s request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.<br /><br />Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff’s office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk’s shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff’s office’s filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Monday<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2025/12/tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>727</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Doug Band And His Epstein Related Congressional Transcript (Part 7) (7/26/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/doug-band-and-his-epstein-related-congressional-transcript-part-7-7-26-26--73170244</link><description><![CDATA[Doug Band told the House Oversight Committee that his personal contact with Jeffrey Epstein was limited, infrequent and largely incidental to his work as Bill Clinton’s longtime aide. He said he barely knew Epstein, did not recall receiving gifts from him and had no knowledge of Epstein’s abuse or other criminal conduct while they were acquainted. Band nevertheless described Epstein and Clinton as appearing to be friends, pointing to the time they spent together, Epstein’s aircraft and his potential value as a supporter of Clinton’s post-presidential work. He acknowledged accompanying Clinton on trips aboard Epstein’s plane and visiting Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse, but said he did not remember witnessing private conversations between the two men or seeing anything improper.<br /><br />Band described a more substantial relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, admitting that they developed a friendship through Clinton’s orbit while firmly denying that it was ever romantic or physical. He said he began hearing troubling reports about Maxwell around 2011 and responded by removing her from Clinton’s contact lists and attempting to cut her out of the former president’s world. Much of the questioning focused on emails suggesting social familiarity, dinners, travel arrangements, birthday plans and flirtatious language, but Band repeatedly said he could not remember the communications or the events being discussed. His testimony therefore presented Epstein as a peripheral acquaintance and Maxwell as a former friend, while leaving lawmakers with numerous instances in which documentary records appeared more detailed than Band’s recollection.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73170244</guid><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73170244/bandtranscripts7.mp3" length="11283270" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/95e7f275-bbe9-43e5-b0b4-bb1a2564a71e/95e7f275-bbe9-43e5-b0b4-bb1a2564a71e.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/95e7f275-bbe9-43e5-b0b4-bb1a2564a71e/95e7f275-bbe9-43e5-b0b4-bb1a2564a71e.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/95e7f275-bbe9-43e5-b0b4-bb1a2564a71e/95e7f275-bbe9-43e5-b0b4-bb1a2564a71e.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Doug Band told the House Oversight Committee that his personal contact with Jeffrey Epstein was limited, infrequent and largely incidental to his work as Bill Clinton’s longtime aide. He said he barely knew Epstein, did not recall receiving gifts from...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Doug Band told the House Oversight Committee that his personal contact with Jeffrey Epstein was limited, infrequent and largely incidental to his work as Bill Clinton’s longtime aide. He said he barely knew Epstein, did not recall receiving gifts from him and had no knowledge of Epstein’s abuse or other criminal conduct while they were acquainted. Band nevertheless described Epstein and Clinton as appearing to be friends, pointing to the time they spent together, Epstein’s aircraft and his potential value as a supporter of Clinton’s post-presidential work. He acknowledged accompanying Clinton on trips aboard Epstein’s plane and visiting Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse, but said he did not remember witnessing private conversations between the two men or seeing anything improper.<br /><br />Band described a more substantial relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, admitting that they developed a friendship through Clinton’s orbit while firmly denying that it was ever romantic or physical. He said he began hearing troubling reports about Maxwell around 2011 and responded by removing her from Clinton’s contact lists and attempting to cut her out of the former president’s world. Much of the questioning focused on emails suggesting social familiarity, dinners, travel arrangements, birthday plans and flirtatious language, but Band repeatedly said he could not remember the communications or the events being discussed. His testimony therefore presented Epstein as a peripheral acquaintance and Maxwell as a former friend, while leaving lawmakers with numerous instances in which documentary records appeared more detailed than Band’s recollection.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>706</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Doug Band And His Epstein Related Congressional Transcript (Part 6) (7/26/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/doug-band-and-his-epstein-related-congressional-transcript-part-6-7-26-26--73170241</link><description><![CDATA[Doug Band told the House Oversight Committee that his personal contact with Jeffrey Epstein was limited, infrequent and largely incidental to his work as Bill Clinton’s longtime aide. He said he barely knew Epstein, did not recall receiving gifts from him and had no knowledge of Epstein’s abuse or other criminal conduct while they were acquainted. Band nevertheless described Epstein and Clinton as appearing to be friends, pointing to the time they spent together, Epstein’s aircraft and his potential value as a supporter of Clinton’s post-presidential work. He acknowledged accompanying Clinton on trips aboard Epstein’s plane and visiting Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse, but said he did not remember witnessing private conversations between the two men or seeing anything improper.<br /><br />Band described a more substantial relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, admitting that they developed a friendship through Clinton’s orbit while firmly denying that it was ever romantic or physical. He said he began hearing troubling reports about Maxwell around 2011 and responded by removing her from Clinton’s contact lists and attempting to cut her out of the former president’s world. Much of the questioning focused on emails suggesting social familiarity, dinners, travel arrangements, birthday plans and flirtatious language, but Band repeatedly said he could not remember the communications or the events being discussed. His testimony therefore presented Epstein as a peripheral acquaintance and Maxwell as a former friend, while leaving lawmakers with numerous instances in which documentary records appeared more detailed than Band’s recollection.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73170241</guid><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 18:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73170241/bandtranscripts6.mp3" length="11571662" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/739d86a9-ce26-42f7-810e-86885fb63eb8/739d86a9-ce26-42f7-810e-86885fb63eb8.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/739d86a9-ce26-42f7-810e-86885fb63eb8/739d86a9-ce26-42f7-810e-86885fb63eb8.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/739d86a9-ce26-42f7-810e-86885fb63eb8/739d86a9-ce26-42f7-810e-86885fb63eb8.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Doug Band told the House Oversight Committee that his personal contact with Jeffrey Epstein was limited, infrequent and largely incidental to his work as Bill Clinton’s longtime aide. He said he barely knew Epstein, did not recall receiving gifts from...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Doug Band told the House Oversight Committee that his personal contact with Jeffrey Epstein was limited, infrequent and largely incidental to his work as Bill Clinton’s longtime aide. He said he barely knew Epstein, did not recall receiving gifts from him and had no knowledge of Epstein’s abuse or other criminal conduct while they were acquainted. Band nevertheless described Epstein and Clinton as appearing to be friends, pointing to the time they spent together, Epstein’s aircraft and his potential value as a supporter of Clinton’s post-presidential work. He acknowledged accompanying Clinton on trips aboard Epstein’s plane and visiting Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse, but said he did not remember witnessing private conversations between the two men or seeing anything improper.<br /><br />Band described a more substantial relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, admitting that they developed a friendship through Clinton’s orbit while firmly denying that it was ever romantic or physical. He said he began hearing troubling reports about Maxwell around 2011 and responded by removing her from Clinton’s contact lists and attempting to cut her out of the former president’s world. Much of the questioning focused on emails suggesting social familiarity, dinners, travel arrangements, birthday plans and flirtatious language, but Band repeatedly said he could not remember the communications or the events being discussed. His testimony therefore presented Epstein as a peripheral acquaintance and Maxwell as a former friend, while leaving lawmakers with numerous instances in which documentary records appeared more detailed than Band’s recollection.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>724</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Doug Band And His Epstein Related Congressional Transcript (Part 5) (7/26/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/doug-band-and-his-epstein-related-congressional-transcript-part-5-7-26-26--73170240</link><description><![CDATA[Doug Band told the House Oversight Committee that his personal contact with Jeffrey Epstein was limited, infrequent and largely incidental to his work as Bill Clinton’s longtime aide. He said he barely knew Epstein, did not recall receiving gifts from him and had no knowledge of Epstein’s abuse or other criminal conduct while they were acquainted. Band nevertheless described Epstein and Clinton as appearing to be friends, pointing to the time they spent together, Epstein’s aircraft and his potential value as a supporter of Clinton’s post-presidential work. He acknowledged accompanying Clinton on trips aboard Epstein’s plane and visiting Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse, but said he did not remember witnessing private conversations between the two men or seeing anything improper.<br /><br />Band described a more substantial relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, admitting that they developed a friendship through Clinton’s orbit while firmly denying that it was ever romantic or physical. He said he began hearing troubling reports about Maxwell around 2011 and responded by removing her from Clinton’s contact lists and attempting to cut her out of the former president’s world. Much of the questioning focused on emails suggesting social familiarity, dinners, travel arrangements, birthday plans and flirtatious language, but Band repeatedly said he could not remember the communications or the events being discussed. His testimony therefore presented Epstein as a peripheral acquaintance and Maxwell as a former friend, while leaving lawmakers with numerous instances in which documentary records appeared more detailed than Band’s recollection.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73170240</guid><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73170240/bandtranscripts5.mp3" length="11101039" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e937296e-9b45-4e09-adef-266a7793c8c1/e937296e-9b45-4e09-adef-266a7793c8c1.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e937296e-9b45-4e09-adef-266a7793c8c1/e937296e-9b45-4e09-adef-266a7793c8c1.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e937296e-9b45-4e09-adef-266a7793c8c1/e937296e-9b45-4e09-adef-266a7793c8c1.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Doug Band told the House Oversight Committee that his personal contact with Jeffrey Epstein was limited, infrequent and largely incidental to his work as Bill Clinton’s longtime aide. He said he barely knew Epstein, did not recall receiving gifts from...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Doug Band told the House Oversight Committee that his personal contact with Jeffrey Epstein was limited, infrequent and largely incidental to his work as Bill Clinton’s longtime aide. He said he barely knew Epstein, did not recall receiving gifts from him and had no knowledge of Epstein’s abuse or other criminal conduct while they were acquainted. Band nevertheless described Epstein and Clinton as appearing to be friends, pointing to the time they spent together, Epstein’s aircraft and his potential value as a supporter of Clinton’s post-presidential work. He acknowledged accompanying Clinton on trips aboard Epstein’s plane and visiting Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse, but said he did not remember witnessing private conversations between the two men or seeing anything improper.<br /><br />Band described a more substantial relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, admitting that they developed a friendship through Clinton’s orbit while firmly denying that it was ever romantic or physical. He said he began hearing troubling reports about Maxwell around 2011 and responded by removing her from Clinton’s contact lists and attempting to cut her out of the former president’s world. Much of the questioning focused on emails suggesting social familiarity, dinners, travel arrangements, birthday plans and flirtatious language, but Band repeatedly said he could not remember the communications or the events being discussed. His testimony therefore presented Epstein as a peripheral acquaintance and Maxwell as a former friend, while leaving lawmakers with numerous instances in which documentary records appeared more detailed than Band’s recollection.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>694</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Author Michael Gross And The Day He Spent With Jean Luc Brunel (7/26/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-author-michael-gross-and-the-day-he-spent-with-jean-luc-brunel-7-26-26--73167632</link><description><![CDATA[Author Michael Gross recalled spending a deeply unsettling day and night with Jean-Luc Brunel while researching his 1995 book about the modeling industry. Gross conducted one of the few lengthy interviews Brunel ever gave, questioning him about allegations that he sexually abused young models and about his cocaine use. Brunel denied the accusations and minimized his drug problem, but Gross said his explanations were barely credible. Throughout the encounter, Gross was struck by Brunel’s arrogance, his control over the young women around him and the atmosphere of fear surrounding models who depended upon him for work and housing.<br /><br />Gross said the most disturbing portion came later, when he accompanied Brunel and two young models through Paris. One of the women showed Gross an apartment connected to Brunel where a hidden peephole had allegedly been drilled through a wall so someone could watch women inside the bathroom. Gross described the models as frightened and vulnerable, despite occasionally laughing or attempting to treat the situation casually. When Brunel eventually drove away with one of the women, Gross asked whether she would be safe; although she answered yes, he said the fear in her eyes suggested otherwise. The encounter left Gross with the impression that Brunel operated a predatory system in which young women’s ambitions, isolation and financial dependence could be used against them.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73167632</guid><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73167632/megamichaelgrossbrunel.mp3" length="50491603" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ff42aaee-7781-4870-9089-fa1dce15c71f/ff42aaee-7781-4870-9089-fa1dce15c71f.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ff42aaee-7781-4870-9089-fa1dce15c71f/ff42aaee-7781-4870-9089-fa1dce15c71f.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ff42aaee-7781-4870-9089-fa1dce15c71f/ff42aaee-7781-4870-9089-fa1dce15c71f.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Author Michael Gross recalled spending a deeply unsettling day and night with Jean-Luc Brunel while researching his 1995 book about the modeling industry. Gross conducted one of the few lengthy interviews Brunel ever gave, questioning him about...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Author Michael Gross recalled spending a deeply unsettling day and night with Jean-Luc Brunel while researching his 1995 book about the modeling industry. Gross conducted one of the few lengthy interviews Brunel ever gave, questioning him about allegations that he sexually abused young models and about his cocaine use. Brunel denied the accusations and minimized his drug problem, but Gross said his explanations were barely credible. Throughout the encounter, Gross was struck by Brunel’s arrogance, his control over the young women around him and the atmosphere of fear surrounding models who depended upon him for work and housing.<br /><br />Gross said the most disturbing portion came later, when he accompanied Brunel and two young models through Paris. One of the women showed Gross an apartment connected to Brunel where a hidden peephole had allegedly been drilled through a wall so someone could watch women inside the bathroom. Gross described the models as frightened and vulnerable, despite occasionally laughing or attempting to treat the situation casually. When Brunel eventually drove away with one of the women, Gross asked whether she would be safe; although she answered yes, he said the fear in her eyes suggested otherwise. The encounter left Gross with the impression that Brunel operated a predatory system in which young women’s ambitions, isolation and financial dependence could be used against them.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3156</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Jeffrey Epstein A Justice System That Looked The Other Way  (7/26/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-a-justice-system-that-looked-the-other-way-7-26-26--73167621</link><description><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein used his wealth, elite connections, and access to influential lawyers to insulate himself from the consequences of years of sexual abuse allegations. He cultivated relationships with politicians, financiers, academics, royalty, and powerful institutions, giving him an aura of legitimacy that made authorities appear reluctant to treat him like an ordinary criminal suspect. When Palm Beach police built a substantial case against him in the mid-2000s, Epstein assembled a high-powered legal team that pressured prosecutors, challenged investigators, and negotiated aggressively behind closed doors. The result was the extraordinary 2007 non-prosecution agreement, which spared him from federal charges, concealed the deal from his victims, and extended protection to unnamed potential co-conspirators.<br /><br />Even after pleading guilty to state prostitution-related charges in 2008, Epstein received treatment that reflected his privileged position. He served much of his sentence in a private wing of the county jail and was granted extensive work-release privileges that allowed him to leave custody for hours at a time, six days a week. After his release, he rebuilt his social standing, continued associating with wealthy and powerful people, and faced little meaningful scrutiny for another decade. Epstein’s story demonstrated how money and influence could slow investigations, soften punishment, intimidate accusers, and turn serious allegations into manageable legal and public-relations problems until federal prosecutors arrested him again in 2019.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73167621</guid><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73167621/megaepsteinmanipulatedlegalsystem.mp3" length="53036138" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3da31ca3-5829-4e34-97ee-9b2cdf4ca86b/3da31ca3-5829-4e34-97ee-9b2cdf4ca86b.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3da31ca3-5829-4e34-97ee-9b2cdf4ca86b/3da31ca3-5829-4e34-97ee-9b2cdf4ca86b.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3da31ca3-5829-4e34-97ee-9b2cdf4ca86b/3da31ca3-5829-4e34-97ee-9b2cdf4ca86b.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jeffrey Epstein used his wealth, elite connections, and access to influential lawyers to insulate himself from the consequences of years of sexual abuse allegations. He cultivated relationships with politicians, financiers, academics, royalty, and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein used his wealth, elite connections, and access to influential lawyers to insulate himself from the consequences of years of sexual abuse allegations. He cultivated relationships with politicians, financiers, academics, royalty, and powerful institutions, giving him an aura of legitimacy that made authorities appear reluctant to treat him like an ordinary criminal suspect. When Palm Beach police built a substantial case against him in the mid-2000s, Epstein assembled a high-powered legal team that pressured prosecutors, challenged investigators, and negotiated aggressively behind closed doors. The result was the extraordinary 2007 non-prosecution agreement, which spared him from federal charges, concealed the deal from his victims, and extended protection to unnamed potential co-conspirators.<br /><br />Even after pleading guilty to state prostitution-related charges in 2008, Epstein received treatment that reflected his privileged position. He served much of his sentence in a private wing of the county jail and was granted extensive work-release privileges that allowed him to leave custody for hours at a time, six days a week. After his release, he rebuilt his social standing, continued associating with wealthy and powerful people, and faced little meaningful scrutiny for another decade. Epstein’s story demonstrated how money and influence could slow investigations, soften punishment, intimidate accusers, and turn serious allegations into manageable legal and public-relations problems until federal prosecutors arrested him again in 2019.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3315</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   Jean Luc Brunel Goes To Ground In The Wake Of Epstein's Arrest (7/26/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jean-luc-brunel-goes-to-ground-in-the-wake-of-epstein-s-arrest-7-26-26--73167620</link><description><![CDATA[After Jeffrey Epstein’s arrest in July 2019, Jean-Luc Brunel seemed to all but disappear from public view. The French modeling agent, long accused of helping Epstein recruit and exploit young women and girls, was reportedly seen only rarely as scrutiny intensified around Epstein’s network. Brunel had spent decades moving through elite fashion circles, but once Epstein was back in custody, he became increasingly difficult to locate, stopped appearing publicly, and avoided the media almost entirely. His sudden absence fueled speculation that he was hiding, being protected, or attempting to stay beyond the reach of investigators.<br /><br />For months, Brunel existed more as a name in court filings, survivor accounts, and investigative reporting than as a visible person. His low profile stood in sharp contrast to the growing attention on his alleged role in Epstein’s operation, especially claims that he used modeling opportunities to gain access to vulnerable young women. That ghostlike period ended in December 2020, when French authorities arrested him at Charles de Gaulle Airport as he was preparing to travel to Senegal. His disappearance after Epstein’s arrest only deepened suspicions that he understood the legal danger he faced and was doing everything possible to remain out of sight.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73167620</guid><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73167620/megaghostknownasbrunel.mp3" length="57166829" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9dc09faa-b786-4d9b-a479-6950dadb192d/9dc09faa-b786-4d9b-a479-6950dadb192d.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9dc09faa-b786-4d9b-a479-6950dadb192d/9dc09faa-b786-4d9b-a479-6950dadb192d.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9dc09faa-b786-4d9b-a479-6950dadb192d/9dc09faa-b786-4d9b-a479-6950dadb192d.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>After Jeffrey Epstein’s arrest in July 2019, Jean-Luc Brunel seemed to all but disappear from public view. The French modeling agent, long accused of helping Epstein recruit and exploit young women and girls, was reportedly seen only rarely as...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[After Jeffrey Epstein’s arrest in July 2019, Jean-Luc Brunel seemed to all but disappear from public view. The French modeling agent, long accused of helping Epstein recruit and exploit young women and girls, was reportedly seen only rarely as scrutiny intensified around Epstein’s network. Brunel had spent decades moving through elite fashion circles, but once Epstein was back in custody, he became increasingly difficult to locate, stopped appearing publicly, and avoided the media almost entirely. His sudden absence fueled speculation that he was hiding, being protected, or attempting to stay beyond the reach of investigators.<br /><br />For months, Brunel existed more as a name in court filings, survivor accounts, and investigative reporting than as a visible person. His low profile stood in sharp contrast to the growing attention on his alleged role in Epstein’s operation, especially claims that he used modeling opportunities to gain access to vulnerable young women. That ghostlike period ended in December 2020, when French authorities arrested him at Charles de Gaulle Airport as he was preparing to travel to Senegal. His disappearance after Epstein’s arrest only deepened suspicions that he understood the legal danger he faced and was doing everything possible to remain out of sight.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3573</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The OIG Report Detailing The Investigation Into Epstein's NPA (Part 6-10) (7/26/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-oig-report-detailing-the-investigation-into-epstein-s-npa-part-6-10-7-26-26--73167604</link><description><![CDATA[The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein’s high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.<br /><br />Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/opr/page/file/1336471/dl" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">dl (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73167604</guid><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73167604/megaoignpa6n7n8n9n10.mp3" length="66803296" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/01b795e8-7ed4-4733-ab60-2ef3b1c0d918/01b795e8-7ed4-4733-ab60-2ef3b1c0d918.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/01b795e8-7ed4-4733-ab60-2ef3b1c0d918/01b795e8-7ed4-4733-ab60-2ef3b1c0d918.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/01b795e8-7ed4-4733-ab60-2ef3b1c0d918/01b795e8-7ed4-4733-ab60-2ef3b1c0d918.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein’s high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.<br /><br />Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/opr/page/file/1336471/dl" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">dl (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4176</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The OIG Report Detailing The Investigation Into Epstein's NPA (Part 1-5) (7/24/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-oig-report-detailing-the-investigation-into-epstein-s-npa-part-1-5-7-24-26--73167603</link><description><![CDATA[The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein’s high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.<br /><br />Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/opr/page/file/1336471/dl" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">dl (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73167603</guid><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73167603/megaoignpa1n2n3n4n5.mp3" length="60296925" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/409b7b2d-6b8d-47ea-97e3-a95226b6ad58/409b7b2d-6b8d-47ea-97e3-a95226b6ad58.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/409b7b2d-6b8d-47ea-97e3-a95226b6ad58/409b7b2d-6b8d-47ea-97e3-a95226b6ad58.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/409b7b2d-6b8d-47ea-97e3-a95226b6ad58/409b7b2d-6b8d-47ea-97e3-a95226b6ad58.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein’s high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.<br /><br />Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/opr/page/file/1336471/dl" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">dl (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3769</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Johanna Sjoberg's Deposition In The Maxwell/Virginia Roberts Suit (Part 7)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/johanna-sjoberg-s-deposition-in-the-maxwell-virginia-roberts-suit-part-7--73134328</link><description><![CDATA[In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.<br /><br /><br />Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein’s company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein’s residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg’s deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73134328</guid><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 04:30:01 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73134328/sjodepoprt7.mp3" length="12818434" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/34b67092-c24b-4fa3-9a4b-897713a08ef5/34b67092-c24b-4fa3-9a4b-897713a08ef5.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/34b67092-c24b-4fa3-9a4b-897713a08ef5/34b67092-c24b-4fa3-9a4b-897713a08ef5.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/34b67092-c24b-4fa3-9a4b-897713a08ef5/34b67092-c24b-4fa3-9a4b-897713a08ef5.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.<br /><br /><br />Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein’s company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein’s residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg’s deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>802</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Johanna Sjoberg's Deposition In The Maxwell/Virginia Roberts Suit (Part 6)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/johanna-sjoberg-s-deposition-in-the-maxwell-virginia-roberts-suit-part-6--73134323</link><description><![CDATA[In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.<br /><br /><br />Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein’s company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein’s residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg’s deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73134323</guid><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 02:30:01 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73134323/sjodepoprt6.mp3" length="14514094" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/12bf677c-e4cb-47ec-a130-2818d66f41f3/12bf677c-e4cb-47ec-a130-2818d66f41f3.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/12bf677c-e4cb-47ec-a130-2818d66f41f3/12bf677c-e4cb-47ec-a130-2818d66f41f3.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/12bf677c-e4cb-47ec-a130-2818d66f41f3/12bf677c-e4cb-47ec-a130-2818d66f41f3.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.<br /><br /><br />Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein’s company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein’s residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg’s deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>908</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Johanna Sjoberg's Deposition In The Maxwell/Virginia Roberts Suit (Part 5)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/johanna-sjoberg-s-deposition-in-the-maxwell-virginia-roberts-suit-part-5--73134326</link><description><![CDATA[In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.<br /><br /><br />Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein’s company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein’s residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg’s deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73134326</guid><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73134326/sjodepprt5.mp3" length="13656442" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ae7dfb65-8fc2-4351-a079-f24b7820b08a/ae7dfb65-8fc2-4351-a079-f24b7820b08a.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ae7dfb65-8fc2-4351-a079-f24b7820b08a/ae7dfb65-8fc2-4351-a079-f24b7820b08a.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ae7dfb65-8fc2-4351-a079-f24b7820b08a/ae7dfb65-8fc2-4351-a079-f24b7820b08a.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.<br /><br /><br />Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein’s company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein’s residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg’s deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>854</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Tyler Robinson's Motion to Halt Further Testing of Bullet Fragment  (Part 2) (7/25/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-s-motion-to-halt-further-testing-of-bullet-fragment-part-2-7-25-26--73166194</link><description><![CDATA[Tyler Robinson’s defense asked Judge Tony Graf to immediately prohibit prosecutors and investigators from conducting any additional testing on a bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Charlie Kirk’s autopsy until the court resolves the dispute. The defense argued that further forensic work could permanently alter, consume, or destroy the fragment, preventing its experts from independently evaluating its condition and evidentiary value. Robinson’s attorneys requested that a defense firearms expert first be allowed to examine and photograph the fragment. As alternatives, they asked that their expert be permitted to observe any additional testing or that the entire process be video-recorded so the defense can later scrutinize exactly what was done.<br /><br />The motion was filed after an ATF examination was unable to conclusively identify the damaged bullet fragment as having been fired from the rifle attributed to Robinson. The result was inconclusive rather than an exclusion, meaning the fragment did not contain enough usable markings to either match it to or rule it out as having come from the rifle. With the FBI reportedly planning additional comparative and lead analysis, the defense maintained that basic fairness and Robinson’s right to challenge the prosecution’s evidence required preserving the fragment before potentially destructive testing occurred. The motion does not ask the judge to declare the evidence exculpatory; it seeks to ensure that the defense has a meaningful opportunity to inspect and document the evidence before its original condition is changed forever.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2026/04/tyler-robinson-ballistics-motion.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">tyler-robinson-ballistics-motion.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73166194</guid><pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73166194/robinsonballisitics2.mp3" length="19529604" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/599e3b3e-b45b-4854-801b-4a14a8ce1d20/599e3b3e-b45b-4854-801b-4a14a8ce1d20.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/599e3b3e-b45b-4854-801b-4a14a8ce1d20/599e3b3e-b45b-4854-801b-4a14a8ce1d20.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/599e3b3e-b45b-4854-801b-4a14a8ce1d20/599e3b3e-b45b-4854-801b-4a14a8ce1d20.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Tyler Robinson’s defense asked Judge Tony Graf to immediately prohibit prosecutors and investigators from conducting any additional testing on a bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Charlie Kirk’s autopsy until the court resolves the dispute. The...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Tyler Robinson’s defense asked Judge Tony Graf to immediately prohibit prosecutors and investigators from conducting any additional testing on a bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Charlie Kirk’s autopsy until the court resolves the dispute. The defense argued that further forensic work could permanently alter, consume, or destroy the fragment, preventing its experts from independently evaluating its condition and evidentiary value. Robinson’s attorneys requested that a defense firearms expert first be allowed to examine and photograph the fragment. As alternatives, they asked that their expert be permitted to observe any additional testing or that the entire process be video-recorded so the defense can later scrutinize exactly what was done.<br /><br />The motion was filed after an ATF examination was unable to conclusively identify the damaged bullet fragment as having been fired from the rifle attributed to Robinson. The result was inconclusive rather than an exclusion, meaning the fragment did not contain enough usable markings to either match it to or rule it out as having come from the rifle. With the FBI reportedly planning additional comparative and lead analysis, the defense maintained that basic fairness and Robinson’s right to challenge the prosecution’s evidence required preserving the fragment before potentially destructive testing occurred. The motion does not ask the judge to declare the evidence exculpatory; it seeks to ensure that the defense has a meaningful opportunity to inspect and document the evidence before its original condition is changed forever.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2026/04/tyler-robinson-ballistics-motion.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">tyler-robinson-ballistics-motion.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1221</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvu</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Tyler Robinson's Motion to Halt Further Testing of Bullet Fragment  (Part 1) (7/25/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-s-motion-to-halt-further-testing-of-bullet-fragment-part-1-7-25-26--73166195</link><description><![CDATA[Tyler Robinson’s defense asked Judge Tony Graf to immediately prohibit prosecutors and investigators from conducting any additional testing on a bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Charlie Kirk’s autopsy until the court resolves the dispute. The defense argued that further forensic work could permanently alter, consume, or destroy the fragment, preventing its experts from independently evaluating its condition and evidentiary value. Robinson’s attorneys requested that a defense firearms expert first be allowed to examine and photograph the fragment. As alternatives, they asked that their expert be permitted to observe any additional testing or that the entire process be video-recorded so the defense can later scrutinize exactly what was done.<br /><br />The motion was filed after an ATF examination was unable to conclusively identify the damaged bullet fragment as having been fired from the rifle attributed to Robinson. The result was inconclusive rather than an exclusion, meaning the fragment did not contain enough usable markings to either match it to or rule it out as having come from the rifle. With the FBI reportedly planning additional comparative and lead analysis, the defense maintained that basic fairness and Robinson’s right to challenge the prosecution’s evidence required preserving the fragment before potentially destructive testing occurred. The motion does not ask the judge to declare the evidence exculpatory; it seeks to ensure that the defense has a meaningful opportunity to inspect and document the evidence before its original condition is changed forever.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2026/04/tyler-robinson-ballistics-motion.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">tyler-robinson-ballistics-motion.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73166195</guid><pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73166195/robinsonballistics1.mp3" length="16294182" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/204f5948-d7ef-4fd6-9d51-399e0ea01980/204f5948-d7ef-4fd6-9d51-399e0ea01980.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/204f5948-d7ef-4fd6-9d51-399e0ea01980/204f5948-d7ef-4fd6-9d51-399e0ea01980.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/204f5948-d7ef-4fd6-9d51-399e0ea01980/204f5948-d7ef-4fd6-9d51-399e0ea01980.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Tyler Robinson’s defense asked Judge Tony Graf to immediately prohibit prosecutors and investigators from conducting any additional testing on a bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Charlie Kirk’s autopsy until the court resolves the dispute. The...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Tyler Robinson’s defense asked Judge Tony Graf to immediately prohibit prosecutors and investigators from conducting any additional testing on a bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Charlie Kirk’s autopsy until the court resolves the dispute. The defense argued that further forensic work could permanently alter, consume, or destroy the fragment, preventing its experts from independently evaluating its condition and evidentiary value. Robinson’s attorneys requested that a defense firearms expert first be allowed to examine and photograph the fragment. As alternatives, they asked that their expert be permitted to observe any additional testing or that the entire process be video-recorded so the defense can later scrutinize exactly what was done.<br /><br />The motion was filed after an ATF examination was unable to conclusively identify the damaged bullet fragment as having been fired from the rifle attributed to Robinson. The result was inconclusive rather than an exclusion, meaning the fragment did not contain enough usable markings to either match it to or rule it out as having come from the rifle. With the FBI reportedly planning additional comparative and lead analysis, the defense maintained that basic fairness and Robinson’s right to challenge the prosecution’s evidence required preserving the fragment before potentially destructive testing occurred. The motion does not ask the judge to declare the evidence exculpatory; it seeks to ensure that the defense has a meaningful opportunity to inspect and document the evidence before its original condition is changed forever.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2026/04/tyler-robinson-ballistics-motion.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">tyler-robinson-ballistics-motion.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1019</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvu</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Doug Band And His Epstein Related Congressional Transcript (Part 4) (7/25/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/doug-band-and-his-epstein-related-congressional-transcript-part-4-7-25-26--73166202</link><description><![CDATA[Doug Band told the House Oversight Committee that his personal contact with Jeffrey Epstein was limited, infrequent and largely incidental to his work as Bill Clinton’s longtime aide. He said he barely knew Epstein, did not recall receiving gifts from him and had no knowledge of Epstein’s abuse or other criminal conduct while they were acquainted. Band nevertheless described Epstein and Clinton as appearing to be friends, pointing to the time they spent together, Epstein’s aircraft and his potential value as a supporter of Clinton’s post-presidential work. He acknowledged accompanying Clinton on trips aboard Epstein’s plane and visiting Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse, but said he did not remember witnessing private conversations between the two men or seeing anything improper.<br /><br />Band described a more substantial relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, admitting that they developed a friendship through Clinton’s orbit while firmly denying that it was ever romantic or physical. He said he began hearing troubling reports about Maxwell around 2011 and responded by removing her from Clinton’s contact lists and attempting to cut her out of the former president’s world. Much of the questioning focused on emails suggesting social familiarity, dinners, travel arrangements, birthday plans and flirtatious language, but Band repeatedly said he could not remember the communications or the events being discussed. His testimony therefore presented Epstein as a peripheral acquaintance and Maxwell as a former friend, while leaving lawmakers with numerous instances in which documentary records appeared more detailed than Band’s recollection.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73166202</guid><pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73166202/bandtranscripts4.mp3" length="12974333" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8cdbdf32-7677-47c4-aff5-7317e22fb828/8cdbdf32-7677-47c4-aff5-7317e22fb828.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8cdbdf32-7677-47c4-aff5-7317e22fb828/8cdbdf32-7677-47c4-aff5-7317e22fb828.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8cdbdf32-7677-47c4-aff5-7317e22fb828/8cdbdf32-7677-47c4-aff5-7317e22fb828.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Doug Band told the House Oversight Committee that his personal contact with Jeffrey Epstein was limited, infrequent and largely incidental to his work as Bill Clinton’s longtime aide. He said he barely knew Epstein, did not recall receiving gifts from...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Doug Band told the House Oversight Committee that his personal contact with Jeffrey Epstein was limited, infrequent and largely incidental to his work as Bill Clinton’s longtime aide. He said he barely knew Epstein, did not recall receiving gifts from him and had no knowledge of Epstein’s abuse or other criminal conduct while they were acquainted. Band nevertheless described Epstein and Clinton as appearing to be friends, pointing to the time they spent together, Epstein’s aircraft and his potential value as a supporter of Clinton’s post-presidential work. He acknowledged accompanying Clinton on trips aboard Epstein’s plane and visiting Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse, but said he did not remember witnessing private conversations between the two men or seeing anything improper.<br /><br />Band described a more substantial relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, admitting that they developed a friendship through Clinton’s orbit while firmly denying that it was ever romantic or physical. He said he began hearing troubling reports about Maxwell around 2011 and responded by removing her from Clinton’s contact lists and attempting to cut her out of the former president’s world. Much of the questioning focused on emails suggesting social familiarity, dinners, travel arrangements, birthday plans and flirtatious language, but Band repeatedly said he could not remember the communications or the events being discussed. His testimony therefore presented Epstein as a peripheral acquaintance and Maxwell as a former friend, while leaving lawmakers with numerous instances in which documentary records appeared more detailed than Band’s recollection.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>811</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Doug Band And His Epstein Related Congressional Transcript (Part 3) (7/25/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/doug-band-and-his-epstein-related-congressional-transcript-part-3-7-25-26--73166203</link><description><![CDATA[Doug Band told the House Oversight Committee that his personal contact with Jeffrey Epstein was limited, infrequent and largely incidental to his work as Bill Clinton’s longtime aide. He said he barely knew Epstein, did not recall receiving gifts from him and had no knowledge of Epstein’s abuse or other criminal conduct while they were acquainted. Band nevertheless described Epstein and Clinton as appearing to be friends, pointing to the time they spent together, Epstein’s aircraft and his potential value as a supporter of Clinton’s post-presidential work. He acknowledged accompanying Clinton on trips aboard Epstein’s plane and visiting Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse, but said he did not remember witnessing private conversations between the two men or seeing anything improper.<br /><br />Band described a more substantial relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, admitting that they developed a friendship through Clinton’s orbit while firmly denying that it was ever romantic or physical. He said he began hearing troubling reports about Maxwell around 2011 and responded by removing her from Clinton’s contact lists and attempting to cut her out of the former president’s world. Much of the questioning focused on emails suggesting social familiarity, dinners, travel arrangements, birthday plans and flirtatious language, but Band repeatedly said he could not remember the communications or the events being discussed. His testimony therefore presented Epstein as a peripheral acquaintance and Maxwell as a former friend, while leaving lawmakers with numerous instances in which documentary records appeared more detailed than Band’s recollection.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73166203</guid><pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 16:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73166203/bandtranscripts3.mp3" length="12540073" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/767fe24b-2360-469a-be75-bb113db2dbfd/767fe24b-2360-469a-be75-bb113db2dbfd.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/767fe24b-2360-469a-be75-bb113db2dbfd/767fe24b-2360-469a-be75-bb113db2dbfd.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/767fe24b-2360-469a-be75-bb113db2dbfd/767fe24b-2360-469a-be75-bb113db2dbfd.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Doug Band told the House Oversight Committee that his personal contact with Jeffrey Epstein was limited, infrequent and largely incidental to his work as Bill Clinton’s longtime aide. He said he barely knew Epstein, did not recall receiving gifts from...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Doug Band told the House Oversight Committee that his personal contact with Jeffrey Epstein was limited, infrequent and largely incidental to his work as Bill Clinton’s longtime aide. He said he barely knew Epstein, did not recall receiving gifts from him and had no knowledge of Epstein’s abuse or other criminal conduct while they were acquainted. Band nevertheless described Epstein and Clinton as appearing to be friends, pointing to the time they spent together, Epstein’s aircraft and his potential value as a supporter of Clinton’s post-presidential work. He acknowledged accompanying Clinton on trips aboard Epstein’s plane and visiting Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse, but said he did not remember witnessing private conversations between the two men or seeing anything improper.<br /><br />Band described a more substantial relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, admitting that they developed a friendship through Clinton’s orbit while firmly denying that it was ever romantic or physical. He said he began hearing troubling reports about Maxwell around 2011 and responded by removing her from Clinton’s contact lists and attempting to cut her out of the former president’s world. Much of the questioning focused on emails suggesting social familiarity, dinners, travel arrangements, birthday plans and flirtatious language, but Band repeatedly said he could not remember the communications or the events being discussed. His testimony therefore presented Epstein as a peripheral acquaintance and Maxwell as a former friend, while leaving lawmakers with numerous instances in which documentary records appeared more detailed than Band’s recollection.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>784</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Les Wexner's Best Friend Was Jeffrey Epstein...Until He Forgot Who He Was (7/25/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-les-wexner-s-best-friend-was-jeffrey-epstein-until-he-forgot-who-he-was-7-25-26--73150089</link><description><![CDATA[Les Wexner’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein was not casual, fleeting, or peripheral. It was foundational. Wexner, the billionaire founder of L Brands and longtime head of Victoria’s Secret, handed Epstein extraordinary financial authority in the late 1980s, granting him sweeping power of attorney over his fortune—an almost unheard-of concession for a man with no formal wealth management credentials and a murky background. Epstein was not just an adviser; he was embedded. He controlled Wexner’s money, managed properties, and reportedly inserted himself into the culture of Wexner’s corporate empire, particularly as it related to the Victoria’s Secret modeling world that conveniently overlapped with Epstein’s trafficking pipeline. The transfer of a Manhattan townhouse—one of the largest private residences in the city—to Epstein for a nominal sum remains one of the most glaring symbols of that patronage. For years, Wexner allowed Epstein to operate under his name and prestige, giving Epstein the legitimacy that opened doors in finance, academia, politics, and philanthropy. Epstein’s entire aura of elite credibility can be traced in large part to the halo effect of Wexner’s wealth and status.<br /><br /><br />After Epstein’s 2006 arrest and especially following the 2019 federal charges, Wexner abruptly attempted to recast himself as a victim—claiming Epstein had betrayed him, stolen from him, and misled him. He publicly severed ties, issued statements of regret, and emphasized that Epstein had been removed from his financial role years earlier. But that narrative strains credibility. Wexner was not an unsophisticated investor duped by a charming con man; he was one of the most powerful retail magnates in America with access to the best legal and financial minds in the world. The idea that Epstein could operate for years under his authority without scrutiny reflects either willful blindness or a level of negligence that borders on complicity. Wexner’s late-stage distancing felt less like moral clarity and more like reputational triage once the full scope of Epstein’s crimes became undeniable. His patronage built Epstein’s empire. His disavowal came only after the empire collapsed in public view.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73150089</guid><pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73150089/megawexnerpatronageofepsteinandhisamnesia.mp3" length="41133497" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/fb1dd474-ad92-4da7-bfed-bb8998149a55/fb1dd474-ad92-4da7-bfed-bb8998149a55.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/fb1dd474-ad92-4da7-bfed-bb8998149a55/fb1dd474-ad92-4da7-bfed-bb8998149a55.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/fb1dd474-ad92-4da7-bfed-bb8998149a55/fb1dd474-ad92-4da7-bfed-bb8998149a55.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Les Wexner’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein was not casual, fleeting, or peripheral. It was foundational. Wexner, the billionaire founder of L Brands and longtime head of Victoria’s Secret, handed Epstein extraordinary financial authority in the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Les Wexner’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein was not casual, fleeting, or peripheral. It was foundational. Wexner, the billionaire founder of L Brands and longtime head of Victoria’s Secret, handed Epstein extraordinary financial authority in the late 1980s, granting him sweeping power of attorney over his fortune—an almost unheard-of concession for a man with no formal wealth management credentials and a murky background. Epstein was not just an adviser; he was embedded. He controlled Wexner’s money, managed properties, and reportedly inserted himself into the culture of Wexner’s corporate empire, particularly as it related to the Victoria’s Secret modeling world that conveniently overlapped with Epstein’s trafficking pipeline. The transfer of a Manhattan townhouse—one of the largest private residences in the city—to Epstein for a nominal sum remains one of the most glaring symbols of that patronage. For years, Wexner allowed Epstein to operate under his name and prestige, giving Epstein the legitimacy that opened doors in finance, academia, politics, and philanthropy. Epstein’s entire aura of elite credibility can be traced in large part to the halo effect of Wexner’s wealth and status.<br /><br /><br />After Epstein’s 2006 arrest and especially following the 2019 federal charges, Wexner abruptly attempted to recast himself as a victim—claiming Epstein had betrayed him, stolen from him, and misled him. He publicly severed ties, issued statements of regret, and emphasized that Epstein had been removed from his financial role years earlier. But that narrative strains credibility. Wexner was not an unsophisticated investor duped by a charming con man; he was one of the most powerful retail magnates in America with access to the best legal and financial minds in the world. The idea that Epstein could operate for years under his authority without scrutiny reflects either willful blindness or a level of negligence that borders on complicity. Wexner’s late-stage distancing felt less like moral clarity and more like reputational triage once the full scope of Epstein’s crimes became undeniable. His patronage built Epstein’s empire. His disavowal came only after the empire collapsed in public view.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2571</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Bill Gates, The Endless Apologies And The CNN Interview (7/25/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bill-gates-the-endless-apologies-and-the-cnn-interview-7-25-26--73150040</link><description><![CDATA[Bill Gates’s attempts at damage control over his ties to Jeffrey Epstein have always sounded less like sincere apologies and more like carefully worded PR spin. He repeatedly leaned on the same tired line that he “made a mistake” by meeting Epstein, as if multiple visits, a cozy dinner at Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse, and repeated interactions could somehow be reduced to a one-off lapse in judgment. His apologies are weasel-like because they dodge the central issue: Gates didn’t just bump into Epstein—he engaged with him knowingly, long after Epstein was a convicted sex offender. Instead of admitting that he chose power networking over morality, he frames it as a regrettable oversight, a minor slip in judgment, as though the public should simply nod along and accept that excuse.<br /><br /><br />Even worse, Gates couches his apologies in a tone of self-pity, acting as though he’s the real victim because people keep asking him about it. Rather than grappling with the disgust of survivors who know exactly what Epstein was, Gates seems more concerned about how the association tarnishes his image and legacy. He wants the world to believe that his proximity to a predator was an innocent blunder, when in reality it was deliberate and calculated—Epstein had money, connections, and a reputation Gates clearly found useful. The result is an apology that reeks of arrogance and evasion, a weasel-like maneuver to deflect blame while never fully owning the gravity of choosing to keep company with a man everyone knew was radioactive.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73150040</guid><pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 12:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73150040/megabillgatesinterviews.mp3" length="66138795" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/88bdd415-b774-4408-a1cf-bc31665b251e/88bdd415-b774-4408-a1cf-bc31665b251e.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/88bdd415-b774-4408-a1cf-bc31665b251e/88bdd415-b774-4408-a1cf-bc31665b251e.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/88bdd415-b774-4408-a1cf-bc31665b251e/88bdd415-b774-4408-a1cf-bc31665b251e.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Bill Gates’s attempts at damage control over his ties to Jeffrey Epstein have always sounded less like sincere apologies and more like carefully worded PR spin. He repeatedly leaned on the same tired line that he “made a mistake” by meeting Epstein,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Bill Gates’s attempts at damage control over his ties to Jeffrey Epstein have always sounded less like sincere apologies and more like carefully worded PR spin. He repeatedly leaned on the same tired line that he “made a mistake” by meeting Epstein, as if multiple visits, a cozy dinner at Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse, and repeated interactions could somehow be reduced to a one-off lapse in judgment. His apologies are weasel-like because they dodge the central issue: Gates didn’t just bump into Epstein—he engaged with him knowingly, long after Epstein was a convicted sex offender. Instead of admitting that he chose power networking over morality, he frames it as a regrettable oversight, a minor slip in judgment, as though the public should simply nod along and accept that excuse.<br /><br /><br />Even worse, Gates couches his apologies in a tone of self-pity, acting as though he’s the real victim because people keep asking him about it. Rather than grappling with the disgust of survivors who know exactly what Epstein was, Gates seems more concerned about how the association tarnishes his image and legacy. He wants the world to believe that his proximity to a predator was an innocent blunder, when in reality it was deliberate and calculated—Epstein had money, connections, and a reputation Gates clearly found useful. The result is an apology that reeks of arrogance and evasion, a weasel-like maneuver to deflect blame while never fully owning the gravity of choosing to keep company with a man everyone knew was radioactive.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4134</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   Les Wexner, The Epstein Accusations And The Built In Escape Hatch (7/25/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-les-wexner-the-epstein-accusations-and-the-built-in-escape-hatch-7-25-26--73150041</link><description><![CDATA[Leslie Wexner, the billionaire founder of L Brands (which once included Victoria’s Secret), has publicly claimed that Jeffrey Epstein betrayed his trust by misappropriating vast sums of money and engaging in unauthorized financial dealings on his behalf. According to Wexner’s account, Epstein was given broad authority over parts of his financial and personal affairs in the 1990s and early 2000s, which he later said Epstein exploited for personal gain. Wexner has suggested that Epstein used that trust to essentially enrich himself—reportedly diverting assets and profiting from deals without clear documentation or approval. This purported betrayal, in Wexner’s telling, was one of the factors that ultimately ended Epstein’s professional relationship with him. Wexner has characterized the financial conduct as deceitful and exploitative, suggesting Epstein’s financial acumen was a smokescreen for self-enrichment at Wexner’s expense.<br /><br />However, a skeptical reading of this narrative raises several unresolved questions and inconsistencies. For one, some details about the scope and mechanics of the alleged financial misconduct remain vague or unverified in public records, leading observers to wonder whether the claims reflect specific documented thefts or a broader, more generalized sense of “being cheated.” Epstein today is often portrayed as having inflated his financial expertise; this has led some analysts to speculate that any discrepancies in Wexner’s accounts might stem less from theft and more from sloppy bookkeeping, mutual misunderstanding, or projection after the relationship soured. Additionally, because Wexner’s statements have sometimes appeared defensive or self-serving—emphasizing his own victimization—the possibility arises that the narrative simplifies or amplifies elements of the relationship to deflect scrutiny from his judgment in empowering Epstein in the first place. Until more concrete evidence is produced, the precise nature and extent of any alleged financial misconduct by Epstein toward Wexner remains a subject of debate rather than settled fact.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73150041</guid><pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73150041/megawexneraccusesepsteintheft.mp3" length="36326966" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/588814f2-e598-4fc2-b335-f4912808fc0b/588814f2-e598-4fc2-b335-f4912808fc0b.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/588814f2-e598-4fc2-b335-f4912808fc0b/588814f2-e598-4fc2-b335-f4912808fc0b.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/588814f2-e598-4fc2-b335-f4912808fc0b/588814f2-e598-4fc2-b335-f4912808fc0b.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Leslie Wexner, the billionaire founder of L Brands (which once included Victoria’s Secret), has publicly claimed that Jeffrey Epstein betrayed his trust by misappropriating vast sums of money and engaging in unauthorized financial dealings on his...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Leslie Wexner, the billionaire founder of L Brands (which once included Victoria’s Secret), has publicly claimed that Jeffrey Epstein betrayed his trust by misappropriating vast sums of money and engaging in unauthorized financial dealings on his behalf. According to Wexner’s account, Epstein was given broad authority over parts of his financial and personal affairs in the 1990s and early 2000s, which he later said Epstein exploited for personal gain. Wexner has suggested that Epstein used that trust to essentially enrich himself—reportedly diverting assets and profiting from deals without clear documentation or approval. This purported betrayal, in Wexner’s telling, was one of the factors that ultimately ended Epstein’s professional relationship with him. Wexner has characterized the financial conduct as deceitful and exploitative, suggesting Epstein’s financial acumen was a smokescreen for self-enrichment at Wexner’s expense.<br /><br />However, a skeptical reading of this narrative raises several unresolved questions and inconsistencies. For one, some details about the scope and mechanics of the alleged financial misconduct remain vague or unverified in public records, leading observers to wonder whether the claims reflect specific documented thefts or a broader, more generalized sense of “being cheated.” Epstein today is often portrayed as having inflated his financial expertise; this has led some analysts to speculate that any discrepancies in Wexner’s accounts might stem less from theft and more from sloppy bookkeeping, mutual misunderstanding, or projection after the relationship soured. Additionally, because Wexner’s statements have sometimes appeared defensive or self-serving—emphasizing his own victimization—the possibility arises that the narrative simplifies or amplifies elements of the relationship to deflect scrutiny from his judgment in empowering Epstein in the first place. Until more concrete evidence is produced, the precise nature and extent of any alleged financial misconduct by Epstein toward Wexner remains a subject of debate rather than settled fact.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2271</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Jeffrey Epstein And His Uncanny Ability To Avoid Consequences (7/25/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-his-uncanny-ability-to-avoid-consequences-7-25-26--73149900</link><description><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein’s extraordinary ability to evade meaningful consequences for years, despite mounting allegations, witness accounts and evidence of sexual abuse, helped fuel the belief that he may have been protected because of intelligence or government connections. The 2007–2008 non-prosecution agreement in Florida became the centerpiece of that suspicion: Epstein avoided federal charges, pleaded guilty to comparatively limited state offenses and served a remarkably lenient sentence that included extensive work release. The deal was negotiated in secret, concealed from survivors and extended protection to unnamed potential co-conspirators, creating the appearance that prosecutors were not merely resolving a case but insulating a broader network. When combined with Epstein’s relationships with politicians, financiers, academics, royalty and former intelligence-linked figures, the outcome looked less like ordinary favoritism and more like institutional protection.<br /><br />Those suspicions only deepened because Epstein continued moving through elite circles after his conviction and was not federally arrested again until 2019, even though the basic allegations against him had been publicly known for years. To some observers, it seemed implausible that a registered sex offender with such a documented pattern of abuse could remain so well connected and so lightly scrutinized without possessing leverage, powerful patrons or some form of official usefulness. None of this proves that Epstein was a government asset, and no definitive public evidence has established that claim, but the combination of his lenient treatment, the secrecy surrounding the Florida agreement and the repeated failures of law enforcement created fertile ground for the theory. The government’s refusal or inability to fully explain how Epstein received such extraordinary consideration ensured that suspicions of intelligence protection would continue long after his arrest and death.<br /><br /><br /><br />to ocntact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73149900</guid><pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73149900/megaepsteinandhisvaluetothefeds.mp3" length="47548364" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9335641c-236d-4660-9c95-d377c3c05e84/9335641c-236d-4660-9c95-d377c3c05e84.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9335641c-236d-4660-9c95-d377c3c05e84/9335641c-236d-4660-9c95-d377c3c05e84.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9335641c-236d-4660-9c95-d377c3c05e84/9335641c-236d-4660-9c95-d377c3c05e84.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jeffrey Epstein’s extraordinary ability to evade meaningful consequences for years, despite mounting allegations, witness accounts and evidence of sexual abuse, helped fuel the belief that he may have been protected because of intelligence or...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein’s extraordinary ability to evade meaningful consequences for years, despite mounting allegations, witness accounts and evidence of sexual abuse, helped fuel the belief that he may have been protected because of intelligence or government connections. The 2007–2008 non-prosecution agreement in Florida became the centerpiece of that suspicion: Epstein avoided federal charges, pleaded guilty to comparatively limited state offenses and served a remarkably lenient sentence that included extensive work release. The deal was negotiated in secret, concealed from survivors and extended protection to unnamed potential co-conspirators, creating the appearance that prosecutors were not merely resolving a case but insulating a broader network. When combined with Epstein’s relationships with politicians, financiers, academics, royalty and former intelligence-linked figures, the outcome looked less like ordinary favoritism and more like institutional protection.<br /><br />Those suspicions only deepened because Epstein continued moving through elite circles after his conviction and was not federally arrested again until 2019, even though the basic allegations against him had been publicly known for years. To some observers, it seemed implausible that a registered sex offender with such a documented pattern of abuse could remain so well connected and so lightly scrutinized without possessing leverage, powerful patrons or some form of official usefulness. None of this proves that Epstein was a government asset, and no definitive public evidence has established that claim, but the combination of his lenient treatment, the secrecy surrounding the Florida agreement and the repeated failures of law enforcement created fertile ground for the theory. The government’s refusal or inability to fully explain how Epstein received such extraordinary consideration ensured that suspicions of intelligence protection would continue long after his arrest and death.<br /><br /><br /><br />to ocntact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2972</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Jeffrey Epstein And The State Of Florida's Investigation In His Prosecution (7/25/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-the-state-of-florida-s-investigation-in-his-prosecution-7-25-26--73149899</link><description><![CDATA[The Florida Department of Law Enforcement’s 2021 inquiry examined whether Palm Beach County sheriff’s personnel committed crimes or acted corruptly while overseeing Jeffrey Epstein’s incarceration, work-release program and privately funded security detail. FDLE reviewed records from the sheriff’s office, courts, prosecutors, Palm Beach police and the Department of Corrections, while interviewing personnel involved in the decisions that allowed Epstein to spend up to 12 hours a day outside the stockade. The inquiry acknowledged that Epstein received highly unusual accommodations, including private housing, extensive work-release privileges and off-duty deputies who were paid to monitor him. It also reviewed allegations that women were brought to Epstein’s office or residence while he remained in custody. Nevertheless, FDLE concluded that it had not developed sufficient evidence of bribery, corruption or other criminal conduct by sheriff’s personnel and ultimately cleared the deputies and officials involved.<br /><br />That conclusion deserves serious skepticism because the investigation was narrowly framed around whether officials could be criminally prosecuted, not whether Epstein’s treatment was improper, reckless or fundamentally different from that afforded to ordinary inmates. FDLE admitted that numerous relevant records had already been destroyed under retention schedules, leaving major gaps in the evidence, and investigators relied heavily on interviews with the very officials whose actions were being examined. The agency also declined to compel testimony from alleged victims because certain potential offenses were outside the statute of limitations, even though civil complaints alleged that Epstein arranged sexual encounters with women at his work-release office and residence while supposedly under supervision. In other words, FDLE found insufficient proof to charge individual deputies, but that is not the same as demonstrating that the system functioned properly. The report documented extraordinary favoritism and missing evidence, then treated the absence of a prosecutable corruption case as though it settled the broader question of how a convicted sex offender was allowed to operate with such freedom.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73149899</guid><pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73149899/megafdlereportepstein.mp3" length="61284145" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2a9d7736-48ae-4844-802a-6699f9411a34/2a9d7736-48ae-4844-802a-6699f9411a34.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2a9d7736-48ae-4844-802a-6699f9411a34/2a9d7736-48ae-4844-802a-6699f9411a34.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2a9d7736-48ae-4844-802a-6699f9411a34/2a9d7736-48ae-4844-802a-6699f9411a34.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Florida Department of Law Enforcement’s 2021 inquiry examined whether Palm Beach County sheriff’s personnel committed crimes or acted corruptly while overseeing Jeffrey Epstein’s incarceration, work-release program and privately funded security...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Florida Department of Law Enforcement’s 2021 inquiry examined whether Palm Beach County sheriff’s personnel committed crimes or acted corruptly while overseeing Jeffrey Epstein’s incarceration, work-release program and privately funded security detail. FDLE reviewed records from the sheriff’s office, courts, prosecutors, Palm Beach police and the Department of Corrections, while interviewing personnel involved in the decisions that allowed Epstein to spend up to 12 hours a day outside the stockade. The inquiry acknowledged that Epstein received highly unusual accommodations, including private housing, extensive work-release privileges and off-duty deputies who were paid to monitor him. It also reviewed allegations that women were brought to Epstein’s office or residence while he remained in custody. Nevertheless, FDLE concluded that it had not developed sufficient evidence of bribery, corruption or other criminal conduct by sheriff’s personnel and ultimately cleared the deputies and officials involved.<br /><br />That conclusion deserves serious skepticism because the investigation was narrowly framed around whether officials could be criminally prosecuted, not whether Epstein’s treatment was improper, reckless or fundamentally different from that afforded to ordinary inmates. FDLE admitted that numerous relevant records had already been destroyed under retention schedules, leaving major gaps in the evidence, and investigators relied heavily on interviews with the very officials whose actions were being examined. The agency also declined to compel testimony from alleged victims because certain potential offenses were outside the statute of limitations, even though civil complaints alleged that Epstein arranged sexual encounters with women at his work-release office and residence while supposedly under supervision. In other words, FDLE found insufficient proof to charge individual deputies, but that is not the same as demonstrating that the system functioned properly. The report documented extraordinary favoritism and missing evidence, then treated the absence of a prosecutable corruption case as though it settled the broader question of how a convicted sex offender was allowed to operate with such freedom.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3831</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Johanna Sjoberg's Deposition In The Maxwell/Virginia Roberts Suit (Part 4)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/johanna-sjoberg-s-deposition-in-the-maxwell-virginia-roberts-suit-part-4--73134324</link><description><![CDATA[In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.<br /><br /><br />Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein’s company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein’s residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg’s deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73134324</guid><pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73134324/sjodepoprt4.mp3" length="13362199" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/07067af5-1d22-4150-96a3-41cb01398a7a/07067af5-1d22-4150-96a3-41cb01398a7a.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/07067af5-1d22-4150-96a3-41cb01398a7a/07067af5-1d22-4150-96a3-41cb01398a7a.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/07067af5-1d22-4150-96a3-41cb01398a7a/07067af5-1d22-4150-96a3-41cb01398a7a.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.<br /><br /><br />Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein’s company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein’s residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg’s deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>836</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Johanna Sjoberg's Deposition In The Maxwell/Virginia Roberts Suit (Part 3)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/johanna-sjoberg-s-deposition-in-the-maxwell-virginia-roberts-suit-part-3--73134330</link><description><![CDATA[In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.<br /><br /><br />Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein’s company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein’s residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg’s deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73134330</guid><pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73134330/sjodepprt3.mp3" length="10666780" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f1860e08-3afa-4f4f-b8ff-74919a83303b/f1860e08-3afa-4f4f-b8ff-74919a83303b.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f1860e08-3afa-4f4f-b8ff-74919a83303b/f1860e08-3afa-4f4f-b8ff-74919a83303b.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f1860e08-3afa-4f4f-b8ff-74919a83303b/f1860e08-3afa-4f4f-b8ff-74919a83303b.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.<br /><br /><br />Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein’s company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein’s residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg’s deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>667</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Johanna Sjoberg's Deposition In The Maxwell/Virginia Roberts Suit (Part 2)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/johanna-sjoberg-s-deposition-in-the-maxwell-virginia-roberts-suit-part-2--73134331</link><description><![CDATA[In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.<br /><br /><br />Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein’s company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein’s residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg’s deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73134331</guid><pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73134331/sjodepoprt2.mp3" length="14358195" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d0143f2a-e5c2-4343-b60e-056e91e61a7d/d0143f2a-e5c2-4343-b60e-056e91e61a7d.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d0143f2a-e5c2-4343-b60e-056e91e61a7d/d0143f2a-e5c2-4343-b60e-056e91e61a7d.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d0143f2a-e5c2-4343-b60e-056e91e61a7d/d0143f2a-e5c2-4343-b60e-056e91e61a7d.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.<br /><br /><br />Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein’s company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein’s residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg’s deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>898</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Johanna Sjoberg's Deposition In The Maxwell/Virginia Roberts Suit (Part 1)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/johanna-sjoberg-s-deposition-in-the-maxwell-virginia-roberts-suit-part-1--73134329</link><description><![CDATA[In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.<br /><br /><br />Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein’s company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein’s residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg’s deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73134329</guid><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73134329/sjodepoprt1.mp3" length="15356282" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9fc8bb9c-31f4-44a5-ac43-26dab6dde32d/9fc8bb9c-31f4-44a5-ac43-26dab6dde32d.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9fc8bb9c-31f4-44a5-ac43-26dab6dde32d/9fc8bb9c-31f4-44a5-ac43-26dab6dde32d.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9fc8bb9c-31f4-44a5-ac43-26dab6dde32d/9fc8bb9c-31f4-44a5-ac43-26dab6dde32d.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.<br /><br /><br />Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein’s company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein’s residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg’s deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>960</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Tyler Robinson Probable Cause Affidavit (Part 2) (7/24/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-tyler-robinson-probable-cause-affidavit-part-2-7-24-26--73130228</link><description><![CDATA[The probable-cause affidavit alleges that Tyler Robinson carried out the September 10, 2025 shooting of Charlie Kirk during an event at Utah Valley University. Investigators said campus surveillance tracked a dark-clothed suspect carrying a backpack as he moved toward the Losee Center, climbed onto its roof and took a prone position overlooking the courtyard shortly before Kirk was shot in the neck. The suspect then sprinted across the roof, climbed down and fled toward a wooded area, where investigators recovered a scoped Mauser Model 98 .30-06 bolt-action rifle wrapped in a towel. Engraved ammunition was found with the weapon, and a shoe impression near the rooftop escape point was described as consistent with Converse-style shoes worn by the suspect.<br /><br />The affidavit says the investigation shifted toward Robinson after a family member reported that he had confessed or implied responsibility. Police also placed Robinson’s gray Dodge Challenger at the university earlier that morning and said his family confirmed that he had recently discussed Kirk’s visit, criticized his views and become increasingly political. Robinson’s roommate then showed investigators messages attributed to “Tyler” discussing a rifle left at a drop point, the towel wrapped around it, engraved bullets, the weapon’s scope and a change of clothing. Based on the surveillance, recovered rifle, family information and digital messages, the officer concluded there was probable cause to arrest Robinson for aggravated murder, felony discharge of a firearm and obstruction of justice.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/documents/23c7187b-5c27-490e-b52d-3f2640f43091.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">23c7187b-5c27-490e-b52d-3f2640f43091.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73130228</guid><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73130228/robinsonprobablecause2.mp3" length="9887704" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/fd9f41b2-6f23-4ede-8900-c3be2b7438b3/fd9f41b2-6f23-4ede-8900-c3be2b7438b3.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/fd9f41b2-6f23-4ede-8900-c3be2b7438b3/fd9f41b2-6f23-4ede-8900-c3be2b7438b3.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/fd9f41b2-6f23-4ede-8900-c3be2b7438b3/fd9f41b2-6f23-4ede-8900-c3be2b7438b3.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The probable-cause affidavit alleges that Tyler Robinson carried out the September 10, 2025 shooting of Charlie Kirk during an event at Utah Valley University. Investigators said campus surveillance tracked a dark-clothed suspect carrying a backpack...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The probable-cause affidavit alleges that Tyler Robinson carried out the September 10, 2025 shooting of Charlie Kirk during an event at Utah Valley University. Investigators said campus surveillance tracked a dark-clothed suspect carrying a backpack as he moved toward the Losee Center, climbed onto its roof and took a prone position overlooking the courtyard shortly before Kirk was shot in the neck. The suspect then sprinted across the roof, climbed down and fled toward a wooded area, where investigators recovered a scoped Mauser Model 98 .30-06 bolt-action rifle wrapped in a towel. Engraved ammunition was found with the weapon, and a shoe impression near the rooftop escape point was described as consistent with Converse-style shoes worn by the suspect.<br /><br />The affidavit says the investigation shifted toward Robinson after a family member reported that he had confessed or implied responsibility. Police also placed Robinson’s gray Dodge Challenger at the university earlier that morning and said his family confirmed that he had recently discussed Kirk’s visit, criticized his views and become increasingly political. Robinson’s roommate then showed investigators messages attributed to “Tyler” discussing a rifle left at a drop point, the towel wrapped around it, engraved bullets, the weapon’s scope and a change of clothing. Based on the surveillance, recovered rifle, family information and digital messages, the officer concluded there was probable cause to arrest Robinson for aggravated murder, felony discharge of a firearm and obstruction of justice.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/documents/23c7187b-5c27-490e-b52d-3f2640f43091.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">23c7187b-5c27-490e-b52d-3f2640f43091.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>618</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvu</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Tyler Robinson Probable Cause Affidavit (Part 1) (7/24/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-tyler-robinson-probable-cause-affidavit-part-1-7-24-26--73130227</link><description><![CDATA[The probable-cause affidavit alleges that Tyler Robinson carried out the September 10, 2025 shooting of Charlie Kirk during an event at Utah Valley University. Investigators said campus surveillance tracked a dark-clothed suspect carrying a backpack as he moved toward the Losee Center, climbed onto its roof and took a prone position overlooking the courtyard shortly before Kirk was shot in the neck. The suspect then sprinted across the roof, climbed down and fled toward a wooded area, where investigators recovered a scoped Mauser Model 98 .30-06 bolt-action rifle wrapped in a towel. Engraved ammunition was found with the weapon, and a shoe impression near the rooftop escape point was described as consistent with Converse-style shoes worn by the suspect.<br /><br />The affidavit says the investigation shifted toward Robinson after a family member reported that he had confessed or implied responsibility. Police also placed Robinson’s gray Dodge Challenger at the university earlier that morning and said his family confirmed that he had recently discussed Kirk’s visit, criticized his views and become increasingly political. Robinson’s roommate then showed investigators messages attributed to “Tyler” discussing a rifle left at a drop point, the towel wrapped around it, engraved bullets, the weapon’s scope and a change of clothing. Based on the surveillance, recovered rifle, family information and digital messages, the officer concluded there was probable cause to arrest Robinson for aggravated murder, felony discharge of a firearm and obstruction of justice.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/documents/23c7187b-5c27-490e-b52d-3f2640f43091.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">23c7187b-5c27-490e-b52d-3f2640f43091.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73130227</guid><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 18:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73130227/robinsonprobablecause1.mp3" length="12889069" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b02b99ff-cddb-4d0a-a6aa-3a2a74efd228/b02b99ff-cddb-4d0a-a6aa-3a2a74efd228.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b02b99ff-cddb-4d0a-a6aa-3a2a74efd228/b02b99ff-cddb-4d0a-a6aa-3a2a74efd228.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b02b99ff-cddb-4d0a-a6aa-3a2a74efd228/b02b99ff-cddb-4d0a-a6aa-3a2a74efd228.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The probable-cause affidavit alleges that Tyler Robinson carried out the September 10, 2025 shooting of Charlie Kirk during an event at Utah Valley University. Investigators said campus surveillance tracked a dark-clothed suspect carrying a backpack...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The probable-cause affidavit alleges that Tyler Robinson carried out the September 10, 2025 shooting of Charlie Kirk during an event at Utah Valley University. Investigators said campus surveillance tracked a dark-clothed suspect carrying a backpack as he moved toward the Losee Center, climbed onto its roof and took a prone position overlooking the courtyard shortly before Kirk was shot in the neck. The suspect then sprinted across the roof, climbed down and fled toward a wooded area, where investigators recovered a scoped Mauser Model 98 .30-06 bolt-action rifle wrapped in a towel. Engraved ammunition was found with the weapon, and a shoe impression near the rooftop escape point was described as consistent with Converse-style shoes worn by the suspect.<br /><br />The affidavit says the investigation shifted toward Robinson after a family member reported that he had confessed or implied responsibility. Police also placed Robinson’s gray Dodge Challenger at the university earlier that morning and said his family confirmed that he had recently discussed Kirk’s visit, criticized his views and become increasingly political. Robinson’s roommate then showed investigators messages attributed to “Tyler” discussing a rifle left at a drop point, the towel wrapped around it, engraved bullets, the weapon’s scope and a change of clothing. Based on the surveillance, recovered rifle, family information and digital messages, the officer concluded there was probable cause to arrest Robinson for aggravated murder, felony discharge of a firearm and obstruction of justice.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/documents/23c7187b-5c27-490e-b52d-3f2640f43091.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">23c7187b-5c27-490e-b52d-3f2640f43091.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>806</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvu</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Was Jeffrey Epstein Working on Behalf of Foreign Governments? (7/24/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/was-jeffrey-epstein-working-on-behalf-of-foreign-governments-7-24-26--73134292</link><description><![CDATA[Congress is asking whether Jeffrey Epstein was doing more than cultivating powerful international contacts and may have been acting as an unregistered intermediary for foreign governments. House Judiciary Committee Democrats, led by Rep. Jamie Raskin, say newly released communications show Epstein offering advice, access and influence to officials connected to Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Russia and Israel, particularly during the first Trump administration. The records reportedly include Epstein offering to represent Saudi interests, advising Kuwaiti contacts ahead of Trump’s 2017 trip to Riyadh, proposing himself as a backchannel between Russian officials and the White House, and assisting former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak with political strategy and contacts. Investigators want to know whether these activities required Epstein to register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act and whether his relationships with influential Americans were used to advance foreign policy objectives.<br /><br />Congress is also asking what the Justice Department, State Department and intelligence agencies knew about Epstein’s foreign relationships, whether they ever investigated him for possible FARA violations and why no enforcement action was taken. Lawmakers are seeking records that could show whether Epstein was merely selling the appearance of access or whether he actually served as a conduit between foreign officials and people inside the U.S. government. The inquiry also raises the broader and more troubling question of whether Epstein’s trafficking operation, collection of compromising information and connections to senior political and business figures had an intelligence dimension. None of that has yet established that Epstein was formally employed by a foreign intelligence service, but Congress is arguing that the evidence is serious enough that the government can no longer dismiss the foreign-agent question without producing the underlying records and explaining what investigators previously found.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73134292</guid><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73134292/epsteinfara.mp3" length="14749823" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/77f4d4bf-d74c-4ae9-91bb-3e5177d7bdaf/77f4d4bf-d74c-4ae9-91bb-3e5177d7bdaf.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/77f4d4bf-d74c-4ae9-91bb-3e5177d7bdaf/77f4d4bf-d74c-4ae9-91bb-3e5177d7bdaf.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/77f4d4bf-d74c-4ae9-91bb-3e5177d7bdaf/77f4d4bf-d74c-4ae9-91bb-3e5177d7bdaf.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Congress is asking whether Jeffrey Epstein was doing more than cultivating powerful international contacts and may have been acting as an unregistered intermediary for foreign governments. House Judiciary Committee Democrats, led by Rep. Jamie Raskin,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Congress is asking whether Jeffrey Epstein was doing more than cultivating powerful international contacts and may have been acting as an unregistered intermediary for foreign governments. House Judiciary Committee Democrats, led by Rep. Jamie Raskin, say newly released communications show Epstein offering advice, access and influence to officials connected to Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Russia and Israel, particularly during the first Trump administration. The records reportedly include Epstein offering to represent Saudi interests, advising Kuwaiti contacts ahead of Trump’s 2017 trip to Riyadh, proposing himself as a backchannel between Russian officials and the White House, and assisting former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak with political strategy and contacts. Investigators want to know whether these activities required Epstein to register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act and whether his relationships with influential Americans were used to advance foreign policy objectives.<br /><br />Congress is also asking what the Justice Department, State Department and intelligence agencies knew about Epstein’s foreign relationships, whether they ever investigated him for possible FARA violations and why no enforcement action was taken. Lawmakers are seeking records that could show whether Epstein was merely selling the appearance of access or whether he actually served as a conduit between foreign officials and people inside the U.S. government. The inquiry also raises the broader and more troubling question of whether Epstein’s trafficking operation, collection of compromising information and connections to senior political and business figures had an intelligence dimension. None of that has yet established that Epstein was formally employed by a foreign intelligence service, but Congress is arguing that the evidence is serious enough that the government can no longer dismiss the foreign-agent question without producing the underlying records and explaining what investigators previously found.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>922</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Epstein Questions Hanging Over the U.S. Virgin Islands Political Establishment (7/24/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-epstein-questions-hanging-over-the-u-s-virgin-islands-political-establishment-7-24-26--73130229</link><description><![CDATA[Leon Black’s congressional testimony encapsulated the broader Epstein scandal because it combined immense wealth, legal maneuvering, institutional deference, and carefully controlled cooperation. Despite paying Epstein at least $158 million for tax and estate-planning services and continuing their relationship after Epstein’s 2008 conviction, Black was initially allowed to appear voluntarily rather than under subpoena. When questioning moved toward women, nondisclosure agreements, and other sensitive matters, he refused to answer and left the interview, forcing the committee to issue a subpoena afterward. That sequence reflected the same pattern that has defined the Epstein case for decades: authorities begin by treating powerful people cautiously, those people exploit that caution, and meaningful pressure is applied only after delay and public embarrassment.<br /><br />The fiasco also demonstrated why every significant witness in the Epstein investigation should be compelled to testify, produce relevant documents, and face serious consequences for lying or obstructing the inquiry. Congress should not permit wealthy associates to decide which subjects are private, irrelevant, or off-limits, particularly when financial arrangements, confidential agreements, and post-conviction relationships may help explain how Epstein maintained his influence. Black’s return under subpoena gives the committee another opportunity to demand direct answers and test his claims against records, payments, communications, and other testimony. Unless lawmakers use their full authority and treat deception as a potential crime rather than a public-relations problem, the investigation will remain another performance in which powerful men delay accountability while survivors are once again expected to wait.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73130229</guid><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73130229/usvistillcorrupt.mp3" length="10077457" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9b876b7f-2241-4000-bfd8-a5efd1352b1a/9b876b7f-2241-4000-bfd8-a5efd1352b1a.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9b876b7f-2241-4000-bfd8-a5efd1352b1a/9b876b7f-2241-4000-bfd8-a5efd1352b1a.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9b876b7f-2241-4000-bfd8-a5efd1352b1a/9b876b7f-2241-4000-bfd8-a5efd1352b1a.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Leon Black’s congressional testimony encapsulated the broader Epstein scandal because it combined immense wealth, legal maneuvering, institutional deference, and carefully controlled cooperation. Despite paying Epstein at least $158 million for tax...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Leon Black’s congressional testimony encapsulated the broader Epstein scandal because it combined immense wealth, legal maneuvering, institutional deference, and carefully controlled cooperation. Despite paying Epstein at least $158 million for tax and estate-planning services and continuing their relationship after Epstein’s 2008 conviction, Black was initially allowed to appear voluntarily rather than under subpoena. When questioning moved toward women, nondisclosure agreements, and other sensitive matters, he refused to answer and left the interview, forcing the committee to issue a subpoena afterward. That sequence reflected the same pattern that has defined the Epstein case for decades: authorities begin by treating powerful people cautiously, those people exploit that caution, and meaningful pressure is applied only after delay and public embarrassment.<br /><br />The fiasco also demonstrated why every significant witness in the Epstein investigation should be compelled to testify, produce relevant documents, and face serious consequences for lying or obstructing the inquiry. Congress should not permit wealthy associates to decide which subjects are private, irrelevant, or off-limits, particularly when financial arrangements, confidential agreements, and post-conviction relationships may help explain how Epstein maintained his influence. Black’s return under subpoena gives the committee another opportunity to demand direct answers and test his claims against records, payments, communications, and other testimony. Unless lawmakers use their full authority and treat deception as a potential crime rather than a public-relations problem, the investigation will remain another performance in which powerful men delay accountability while survivors are once again expected to wait.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>630</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Alleged Epstein Recruiter Daniel Siad Found Dead In Paris (7/24/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/alleged-epstein-recruiter-daniel-siad-found-dead-in-paris-7-24-26--73130230</link><description><![CDATA[Daniel Siad, a 69-year-old modeling scout extensively linked to Jeffrey Epstein in newly released records, was found dead Monday inside his home in Colombes, outside Paris. French prosecutors have opened an investigation into the cause of death and ordered an autopsy, although one report cited cardiac arrest. Siad had not yet been questioned by investigators examining allegations that he helped Epstein traffic and abuse women, despite being the subject of several complaints, including rape allegations. He denied wrongdoing and said he wanted the opportunity to explain himself, maintaining that Epstein had taken advantage of his trust.<br /><br />Siad’s name appeared in more than 1,000 documents connected to the Epstein files, including years of emails in which he discussed scouting young women across Europe and elsewhere, arranging meetings, sending photographs and descriptions, and seeking reimbursement for travel and recruitment expenses. Some of the women discussed were teenagers, and Epstein often responded by asking about their ages or physical appearance. Siad claimed these introductions were legitimate modeling castings and denied knowingly placing anyone in danger, but multiple women accused him of abuse or of helping funnel women toward Epstein. His death also draws comparisons to Jean-Luc Brunel, another modeling-industry figure accused of procuring women for Epstein, who died in a French jail in 2022 before his case reached trial.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-15996195/Modelling-scout-suspected-Epstein-pimp-dead-Paris-home-appeared-thousand-times-declassified-files.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Modelling scout and suspected Epstein pimp is found dead at his Paris home after name appeared more than a thousand times in declassified files | Daily Mail Online</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73130230</guid><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73130230/siaddead.mp3" length="12983528" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/04d3c7b4-253a-42ce-abc2-27e378bb260e/04d3c7b4-253a-42ce-abc2-27e378bb260e.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/04d3c7b4-253a-42ce-abc2-27e378bb260e/04d3c7b4-253a-42ce-abc2-27e378bb260e.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/04d3c7b4-253a-42ce-abc2-27e378bb260e/04d3c7b4-253a-42ce-abc2-27e378bb260e.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Daniel Siad, a 69-year-old modeling scout extensively linked to Jeffrey Epstein in newly released records, was found dead Monday inside his home in Colombes, outside Paris. French prosecutors have opened an investigation into the cause of death and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Daniel Siad, a 69-year-old modeling scout extensively linked to Jeffrey Epstein in newly released records, was found dead Monday inside his home in Colombes, outside Paris. French prosecutors have opened an investigation into the cause of death and ordered an autopsy, although one report cited cardiac arrest. Siad had not yet been questioned by investigators examining allegations that he helped Epstein traffic and abuse women, despite being the subject of several complaints, including rape allegations. He denied wrongdoing and said he wanted the opportunity to explain himself, maintaining that Epstein had taken advantage of his trust.<br /><br />Siad’s name appeared in more than 1,000 documents connected to the Epstein files, including years of emails in which he discussed scouting young women across Europe and elsewhere, arranging meetings, sending photographs and descriptions, and seeking reimbursement for travel and recruitment expenses. Some of the women discussed were teenagers, and Epstein often responded by asking about their ages or physical appearance. Siad claimed these introductions were legitimate modeling castings and denied knowingly placing anyone in danger, but multiple women accused him of abuse or of helping funnel women toward Epstein. His death also draws comparisons to Jean-Luc Brunel, another modeling-industry figure accused of procuring women for Epstein, who died in a French jail in 2022 before his case reached trial.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-15996195/Modelling-scout-suspected-Epstein-pimp-dead-Paris-home-appeared-thousand-times-declassified-files.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Modelling scout and suspected Epstein pimp is found dead at his Paris home after name appeared more than a thousand times in declassified files | Daily Mail Online</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>812</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Jeffrey Epstein And The Men Who Had His Ear (7/24/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-the-men-who-had-his-ear-7-24-26--73128164</link><description><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein maintained close and mutually useful relationships with author Michael Wolff and political strategist Steve Bannon during the years after his 2008 conviction. Wolff conducted extensive interviews with Epstein and remained in contact with him while gathering material about Donald Trump, becoming both a chronicler of Epstein’s world and, at times, an adviser on how Epstein might navigate mounting media scrutiny. Bannon’s relationship appears to have gone even further, with the two men regularly exchanging political advice, arranging travel and discussing international contacts. Bannon also recorded hours of interviews with Epstein for a proposed documentary and privately described the project as media training aimed at pushing back against the trafficking allegations and rebuilding Epstein’s reputation. The communications portray Epstein, Wolff and Bannon as men who recognized the value of one another’s information, access and influence, even as Epstein’s history as a convicted sex offender was already publicly known.<br /><br />Steven Mnuchin’s connection to Jean-Luc Brunel was more indirect and should not be overstated as a proven personal partnership. Corporate records listed Mnuchin as the official New York state contact for Next Management Corporation, a company formed by Jean-Luc and Arnaud Brunel, meaning his name was attached to receiving legal documents and handling official filings for the business. Mnuchin’s representatives later said he did not remember meeting the Brunel brothers, had never done business with them and did not know why he had been listed in that role, although they acknowledged his longtime friendship with Faith Kates, who later co-founded Next Model Management with the Brunels. The records nevertheless placed a future Treasury secretary in an official corporate role connected to Brunel, the modeling agent who became one of Epstein’s closest associates and was accused of using the modeling industry to procure vulnerable young women and girls.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73128164</guid><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 10:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73128164/megamnuchinwolffbannon.mp3" length="51308295" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f11d9305-6432-42d0-a492-d332f3912469/f11d9305-6432-42d0-a492-d332f3912469.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f11d9305-6432-42d0-a492-d332f3912469/f11d9305-6432-42d0-a492-d332f3912469.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f11d9305-6432-42d0-a492-d332f3912469/f11d9305-6432-42d0-a492-d332f3912469.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jeffrey Epstein maintained close and mutually useful relationships with author Michael Wolff and political strategist Steve Bannon during the years after his 2008 conviction. Wolff conducted extensive interviews with Epstein and remained in contact...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein maintained close and mutually useful relationships with author Michael Wolff and political strategist Steve Bannon during the years after his 2008 conviction. Wolff conducted extensive interviews with Epstein and remained in contact with him while gathering material about Donald Trump, becoming both a chronicler of Epstein’s world and, at times, an adviser on how Epstein might navigate mounting media scrutiny. Bannon’s relationship appears to have gone even further, with the two men regularly exchanging political advice, arranging travel and discussing international contacts. Bannon also recorded hours of interviews with Epstein for a proposed documentary and privately described the project as media training aimed at pushing back against the trafficking allegations and rebuilding Epstein’s reputation. The communications portray Epstein, Wolff and Bannon as men who recognized the value of one another’s information, access and influence, even as Epstein’s history as a convicted sex offender was already publicly known.<br /><br />Steven Mnuchin’s connection to Jean-Luc Brunel was more indirect and should not be overstated as a proven personal partnership. Corporate records listed Mnuchin as the official New York state contact for Next Management Corporation, a company formed by Jean-Luc and Arnaud Brunel, meaning his name was attached to receiving legal documents and handling official filings for the business. Mnuchin’s representatives later said he did not remember meeting the Brunel brothers, had never done business with them and did not know why he had been listed in that role, although they acknowledged his longtime friendship with Faith Kates, who later co-founded Next Model Management with the Brunels. The records nevertheless placed a future Treasury secretary in an official corporate role connected to Brunel, the modeling agent who became one of Epstein’s closest associates and was accused of using the modeling industry to procure vulnerable young women and girls.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3207</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Ghislaine Maxwell And The People Who Pushed Hardest For Her Freedom (7/24/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-ghislaine-maxwell-and-the-people-who-pushed-hardest-for-her-freedom-7-24-26--73128122</link><description><![CDATA[Ghislaine Maxwell’s family has been the driving force behind the campaign to recast her as a victim of prosecutorial misconduct rather than a convicted participant in Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking operation. Her siblings have promoted the “Real Ghislaine” campaign, issued public statements attacking the fairness of her trial, supported repeated appeals and amplified claims about biased jurors, harsh jail conditions and the supposed protection offered by Epstein’s Florida non-prosecution agreement. Even after the federal appeals court rejected her arguments and upheld her conviction and 20-year sentence, the family continued pressing the idea that she had been scapegoated for Epstein’s crimes.<br /><br />The campaign is difficult to take seriously because it routinely minimizes the evidence presented at trial and pushes the survivors who testified against Maxwell into the background. A jury did not convict her merely because she knew Epstein; prosecutors presented testimony that she recruited, groomed and normalized the abuse of underage girls, and the appeals court concluded that her trial and sentence were legally sound. Her family is entitled to support her personally, but their public-relations offensive often resembles an attempt to rewrite the case, portraying Maxwell as the chief casualty while largely ignoring the women whose exploitation made her conviction possible. More recently, Maxwell herself has pursued clemency while offering politically valuable testimony, reinforcing the impression that the broader campaign is less about establishing innocence than finding a powerful person willing to open the prison door.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73128122</guid><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 08:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73128122/megamaxfamilysupport.mp3" length="50147204" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ed14653d-3a8d-413e-a9be-0196f830dedf/ed14653d-3a8d-413e-a9be-0196f830dedf.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ed14653d-3a8d-413e-a9be-0196f830dedf/ed14653d-3a8d-413e-a9be-0196f830dedf.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ed14653d-3a8d-413e-a9be-0196f830dedf/ed14653d-3a8d-413e-a9be-0196f830dedf.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Ghislaine Maxwell’s family has been the driving force behind the campaign to recast her as a victim of prosecutorial misconduct rather than a convicted participant in Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking operation. Her siblings have promoted the “Real...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Ghislaine Maxwell’s family has been the driving force behind the campaign to recast her as a victim of prosecutorial misconduct rather than a convicted participant in Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking operation. Her siblings have promoted the “Real Ghislaine” campaign, issued public statements attacking the fairness of her trial, supported repeated appeals and amplified claims about biased jurors, harsh jail conditions and the supposed protection offered by Epstein’s Florida non-prosecution agreement. Even after the federal appeals court rejected her arguments and upheld her conviction and 20-year sentence, the family continued pressing the idea that she had been scapegoated for Epstein’s crimes.<br /><br />The campaign is difficult to take seriously because it routinely minimizes the evidence presented at trial and pushes the survivors who testified against Maxwell into the background. A jury did not convict her merely because she knew Epstein; prosecutors presented testimony that she recruited, groomed and normalized the abuse of underage girls, and the appeals court concluded that her trial and sentence were legally sound. Her family is entitled to support her personally, but their public-relations offensive often resembles an attempt to rewrite the case, portraying Maxwell as the chief casualty while largely ignoring the women whose exploitation made her conviction possible. More recently, Maxwell herself has pursued clemency while offering politically valuable testimony, reinforcing the impression that the broader campaign is less about establishing innocence than finding a powerful person willing to open the prison door.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3135</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Ghislaine Maxwell And Her Shameless Attempt To Change History (7/23/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-ghislaine-maxwell-and-her-shameless-attempt-to-change-history-7-23-26--73128121</link><description><![CDATA[Ghislaine Maxwell repeatedly attempted to portray herself as another casualty of Jeffrey Epstein, emphasizing his alleged manipulation, control and betrayal while highlighting the humiliation, isolation and punishment she had endured since her arrest. At sentencing, she shifted attention toward Epstein’s character and suggested that association with him had become the greatest mistake of her life, but she stopped short of accepting full responsibility for recruiting, grooming and facilitating the abuse of underage girls. Her presentation cast her as someone who had been misled by a powerful man rather than as an active participant who helped create the conditions in which Epstein could repeatedly exploit vulnerable victims. Prosecutors, however, described Maxwell as instrumental to the abuse and emphasized that she had played a central role in identifying, grooming and abusing victims while enjoying the wealth and privilege that came with her relationship with Epstein.<br /><br />At the same time, Maxwell minimized the suffering of the actual survivors by offering an expression of sympathy that many viewed as evasive rather than a genuine apology. She did not directly acknowledge the specific acts for which she had been convicted, confront the lifelong damage described in the victims’ statements or admit that she had used trust, attention and promises of opportunity to help deliver young girls into Epstein’s orbit. Instead, her remarks redirected blame toward Epstein and centered her own losses, allowing her to appear remorseful without fully recognizing the agency she exercised or the devastation she caused. For survivors who described years of trauma, shame, fear and damaged relationships, Maxwell’s effort to claim victimhood was especially offensive because it placed her discomfort beside suffering that she had actively helped inflict.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonnmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73128121</guid><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73128121/megamaxwellpaintedasvictimshamesrealvictims.mp3" length="51890094" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a28d17a0-5352-45f7-b56a-f2818f0d55fe/a28d17a0-5352-45f7-b56a-f2818f0d55fe.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a28d17a0-5352-45f7-b56a-f2818f0d55fe/a28d17a0-5352-45f7-b56a-f2818f0d55fe.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a28d17a0-5352-45f7-b56a-f2818f0d55fe/a28d17a0-5352-45f7-b56a-f2818f0d55fe.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Ghislaine Maxwell repeatedly attempted to portray herself as another casualty of Jeffrey Epstein, emphasizing his alleged manipulation, control and betrayal while highlighting the humiliation, isolation and punishment she had endured since her arrest....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Ghislaine Maxwell repeatedly attempted to portray herself as another casualty of Jeffrey Epstein, emphasizing his alleged manipulation, control and betrayal while highlighting the humiliation, isolation and punishment she had endured since her arrest. At sentencing, she shifted attention toward Epstein’s character and suggested that association with him had become the greatest mistake of her life, but she stopped short of accepting full responsibility for recruiting, grooming and facilitating the abuse of underage girls. Her presentation cast her as someone who had been misled by a powerful man rather than as an active participant who helped create the conditions in which Epstein could repeatedly exploit vulnerable victims. Prosecutors, however, described Maxwell as instrumental to the abuse and emphasized that she had played a central role in identifying, grooming and abusing victims while enjoying the wealth and privilege that came with her relationship with Epstein.<br /><br />At the same time, Maxwell minimized the suffering of the actual survivors by offering an expression of sympathy that many viewed as evasive rather than a genuine apology. She did not directly acknowledge the specific acts for which she had been convicted, confront the lifelong damage described in the victims’ statements or admit that she had used trust, attention and promises of opportunity to help deliver young girls into Epstein’s orbit. Instead, her remarks redirected blame toward Epstein and centered her own losses, allowing her to appear remorseful without fully recognizing the agency she exercised or the devastation she caused. For survivors who described years of trauma, shame, fear and damaged relationships, Maxwell’s effort to claim victimhood was especially offensive because it placed her discomfort beside suffering that she had actively helped inflict.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonnmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3244</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Jane Doe # 17 And Her Claims Against Jeffrey Epstein And His Estate (Part 5)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/jane-doe-17-and-her-claims-against-jeffrey-epstein-and-his-estate-part-5--73093510</link><description><![CDATA[The trip into the underbelly of the Epstein operation continues in this episode as we begin our look at Jane Doe # 17 and her MANY allegations against Jeffrey Epstein and his companies. <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.vicourts.org/common/pages/DisplayFile.aspx?itemId=16519327" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">DisplayFile.aspx (vicourts.org)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73093510</guid><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73093510/janedoe17prt5.mp3" length="12757411" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d93bc313-0e2f-457a-bc8b-692ba9bee5db/d93bc313-0e2f-457a-bc8b-692ba9bee5db.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d93bc313-0e2f-457a-bc8b-692ba9bee5db/d93bc313-0e2f-457a-bc8b-692ba9bee5db.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d93bc313-0e2f-457a-bc8b-692ba9bee5db/d93bc313-0e2f-457a-bc8b-692ba9bee5db.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The trip into the underbelly of the Epstein operation continues in this episode as we begin our look at Jane Doe # 17 and her MANY allegations against Jeffrey Epstein and his companies. 





to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The trip into the underbelly of the Epstein operation continues in this episode as we begin our look at Jane Doe # 17 and her MANY allegations against Jeffrey Epstein and his companies. <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.vicourts.org/common/pages/DisplayFile.aspx?itemId=16519327" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">DisplayFile.aspx (vicourts.org)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>798</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Jane Doe # 17 And Her Claims Against Jeffrey Epstein And His Estate (Part 4)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/jane-doe-17-and-her-claims-against-jeffrey-epstein-and-his-estate-part-4--73093513</link><description><![CDATA[The trip into the underbelly of the Epstein operation continues in this episode as we begin our look at Jane Doe # 17 and her MANY allegations against Jeffrey Epstein and his companies. <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.vicourts.org/common/pages/DisplayFile.aspx?itemId=16519327" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">DisplayFile.aspx (vicourts.org)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73093513</guid><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 02:30:01 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73093513/janedoe17prt4.mp3" length="11471350" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/44e2786c-aabe-4179-8120-c883fbe0590c/44e2786c-aabe-4179-8120-c883fbe0590c.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/44e2786c-aabe-4179-8120-c883fbe0590c/44e2786c-aabe-4179-8120-c883fbe0590c.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/44e2786c-aabe-4179-8120-c883fbe0590c/44e2786c-aabe-4179-8120-c883fbe0590c.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The trip into the underbelly of the Epstein operation continues in this episode as we begin our look at Jane Doe # 17 and her MANY allegations against Jeffrey Epstein and his companies. 





to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The trip into the underbelly of the Epstein operation continues in this episode as we begin our look at Jane Doe # 17 and her MANY allegations against Jeffrey Epstein and his companies. <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.vicourts.org/common/pages/DisplayFile.aspx?itemId=16519327" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">DisplayFile.aspx (vicourts.org)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>717</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Jane Doe # 17 And Her Claims Against Jeffrey Epstein And His Estate (Part 3)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/jane-doe-17-and-her-claims-against-jeffrey-epstein-and-his-estate-part-3--73093512</link><description><![CDATA[The trip into the underbelly of the Epstein operation continues in this episode as we begin our look at Jane Doe # 17 and her MANY allegations against Jeffrey Epstein and his companies. <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.vicourts.org/common/pages/DisplayFile.aspx?itemId=16519327" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">DisplayFile.aspx (vicourts.org)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73093512</guid><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73093512/janedoe17prt3.mp3" length="14821293" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/06d1c6fe-1538-4f32-84d8-e6491430c948/06d1c6fe-1538-4f32-84d8-e6491430c948.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/06d1c6fe-1538-4f32-84d8-e6491430c948/06d1c6fe-1538-4f32-84d8-e6491430c948.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/06d1c6fe-1538-4f32-84d8-e6491430c948/06d1c6fe-1538-4f32-84d8-e6491430c948.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The trip into the underbelly of the Epstein operation continues in this episode as we begin our look at Jane Doe # 17 and her MANY allegations against Jeffrey Epstein and his companies. 





to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The trip into the underbelly of the Epstein operation continues in this episode as we begin our look at Jane Doe # 17 and her MANY allegations against Jeffrey Epstein and his companies. <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.vicourts.org/common/pages/DisplayFile.aspx?itemId=16519327" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">DisplayFile.aspx (vicourts.org)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>927</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Doug Band And His Epstein Related Congressional Transcript (Part 2) (7/23/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/doug-band-and-his-epstein-related-congressional-transcript-part-2-7-23-26--73111323</link><description><![CDATA[Doug Band told the House Oversight Committee that his personal contact with Jeffrey Epstein was limited, infrequent and largely incidental to his work as Bill Clinton’s longtime aide. He said he barely knew Epstein, did not recall receiving gifts from him and had no knowledge of Epstein’s abuse or other criminal conduct while they were acquainted. Band nevertheless described Epstein and Clinton as appearing to be friends, pointing to the time they spent together, Epstein’s aircraft and his potential value as a supporter of Clinton’s post-presidential work. He acknowledged accompanying Clinton on trips aboard Epstein’s plane and visiting Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse, but said he did not remember witnessing private conversations between the two men or seeing anything improper.<br /><br />Band described a more substantial relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, admitting that they developed a friendship through Clinton’s orbit while firmly denying that it was ever romantic or physical. He said he began hearing troubling reports about Maxwell around 2011 and responded by removing her from Clinton’s contact lists and attempting to cut her out of the former president’s world. Much of the questioning focused on emails suggesting social familiarity, dinners, travel arrangements, birthday plans and flirtatious language, but Band repeatedly said he could not remember the communications or the events being discussed. His testimony therefore presented Epstein as a peripheral acquaintance and Maxwell as a former friend, while leaving lawmakers with numerous instances in which documentary records appeared more detailed than Band’s recollection.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73111323</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 22:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73111323/bandtranscripts2.mp3" length="12883635" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cf38c5f3-1775-4112-928b-5c553ec4e83b/cf38c5f3-1775-4112-928b-5c553ec4e83b.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cf38c5f3-1775-4112-928b-5c553ec4e83b/cf38c5f3-1775-4112-928b-5c553ec4e83b.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cf38c5f3-1775-4112-928b-5c553ec4e83b/cf38c5f3-1775-4112-928b-5c553ec4e83b.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Doug Band told the House Oversight Committee that his personal contact with Jeffrey Epstein was limited, infrequent and largely incidental to his work as Bill Clinton’s longtime aide. He said he barely knew Epstein, did not recall receiving gifts from...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Doug Band told the House Oversight Committee that his personal contact with Jeffrey Epstein was limited, infrequent and largely incidental to his work as Bill Clinton’s longtime aide. He said he barely knew Epstein, did not recall receiving gifts from him and had no knowledge of Epstein’s abuse or other criminal conduct while they were acquainted. Band nevertheless described Epstein and Clinton as appearing to be friends, pointing to the time they spent together, Epstein’s aircraft and his potential value as a supporter of Clinton’s post-presidential work. He acknowledged accompanying Clinton on trips aboard Epstein’s plane and visiting Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse, but said he did not remember witnessing private conversations between the two men or seeing anything improper.<br /><br />Band described a more substantial relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, admitting that they developed a friendship through Clinton’s orbit while firmly denying that it was ever romantic or physical. He said he began hearing troubling reports about Maxwell around 2011 and responded by removing her from Clinton’s contact lists and attempting to cut her out of the former president’s world. Much of the questioning focused on emails suggesting social familiarity, dinners, travel arrangements, birthday plans and flirtatious language, but Band repeatedly said he could not remember the communications or the events being discussed. His testimony therefore presented Epstein as a peripheral acquaintance and Maxwell as a former friend, while leaving lawmakers with numerous instances in which documentary records appeared more detailed than Band’s recollection.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>806</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Doug Band And His Epstein Related Congressional Transcript (Part 1) (7/23/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/doug-band-and-his-epstein-related-congressional-transcript-part-1-7-23-26--73111322</link><description><![CDATA[Doug Band told the House Oversight Committee that his personal contact with Jeffrey Epstein was limited, infrequent and largely incidental to his work as Bill Clinton’s longtime aide. He said he barely knew Epstein, did not recall receiving gifts from him and had no knowledge of Epstein’s abuse or other criminal conduct while they were acquainted. Band nevertheless described Epstein and Clinton as appearing to be friends, pointing to the time they spent together, Epstein’s aircraft and his potential value as a supporter of Clinton’s post-presidential work. He acknowledged accompanying Clinton on trips aboard Epstein’s plane and visiting Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse, but said he did not remember witnessing private conversations between the two men or seeing anything improper.<br /><br />Band described a more substantial relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, admitting that they developed a friendship through Clinton’s orbit while firmly denying that it was ever romantic or physical. He said he began hearing troubling reports about Maxwell around 2011 and responded by removing her from Clinton’s contact lists and attempting to cut her out of the former president’s world. Much of the questioning focused on emails suggesting social familiarity, dinners, travel arrangements, birthday plans and flirtatious language, but Band repeatedly said he could not remember the communications or the events being discussed. His testimony therefore presented Epstein as a peripheral acquaintance and Maxwell as a former friend, while leaving lawmakers with numerous instances in which documentary records appeared more detailed than Band’s recollection.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73111322</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73111322/bandtranscript1.mp3" length="13327090" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a22a362c-d5b1-4bc8-a90e-cf9efecfcc1e/a22a362c-d5b1-4bc8-a90e-cf9efecfcc1e.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a22a362c-d5b1-4bc8-a90e-cf9efecfcc1e/a22a362c-d5b1-4bc8-a90e-cf9efecfcc1e.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a22a362c-d5b1-4bc8-a90e-cf9efecfcc1e/a22a362c-d5b1-4bc8-a90e-cf9efecfcc1e.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Doug Band told the House Oversight Committee that his personal contact with Jeffrey Epstein was limited, infrequent and largely incidental to his work as Bill Clinton’s longtime aide. He said he barely knew Epstein, did not recall receiving gifts from...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Doug Band told the House Oversight Committee that his personal contact with Jeffrey Epstein was limited, infrequent and largely incidental to his work as Bill Clinton’s longtime aide. He said he barely knew Epstein, did not recall receiving gifts from him and had no knowledge of Epstein’s abuse or other criminal conduct while they were acquainted. Band nevertheless described Epstein and Clinton as appearing to be friends, pointing to the time they spent together, Epstein’s aircraft and his potential value as a supporter of Clinton’s post-presidential work. He acknowledged accompanying Clinton on trips aboard Epstein’s plane and visiting Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse, but said he did not remember witnessing private conversations between the two men or seeing anything improper.<br /><br />Band described a more substantial relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, admitting that they developed a friendship through Clinton’s orbit while firmly denying that it was ever romantic or physical. He said he began hearing troubling reports about Maxwell around 2011 and responded by removing her from Clinton’s contact lists and attempting to cut her out of the former president’s world. Much of the questioning focused on emails suggesting social familiarity, dinners, travel arrangements, birthday plans and flirtatious language, but Band repeatedly said he could not remember the communications or the events being discussed. His testimony therefore presented Epstein as a peripheral acquaintance and Maxwell as a former friend, while leaving lawmakers with numerous instances in which documentary records appeared more detailed than Band’s recollection.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>833</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Jes Staley Is Set To Face Congress Today Over His Epstein Ties (7/23/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/jes-staley-is-set-to-face-congress-today-over-his-epstein-ties-7-23-26--73130246</link><description><![CDATA[Jes Staley’s appearance before Congress centers on the collapse of his long-running effort to portray his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein as distant, professional and misunderstood. The record suggests something far closer: years of communication, visits, continued contact after Epstein’s 2008 conviction and descriptions of the relationship that went well beyond ordinary banker-client business. Staley has repeatedly leaned on selective memory and claims of ignorance, but those defenses are difficult to reconcile with his experience as one of the world’s most sophisticated financial executives. Regulators in Britain already concluded that he misleadingly characterized the relationship, and the documentary evidence has made his attempts to minimize it increasingly untenable.<br /><br />Congress now has an obligation to confront Staley with the emails, travel records, regulatory findings and contradictions he has spent years trying to explain away. His loss of status and career should not be confused with the suffering endured by Epstein’s victims, and he should not be allowed to recast himself as another casualty of Epstein’s deception. The central question is not whether Staley can survive another hearing with his reputation partially intact, but whether his narrative can survive direct comparison with the facts. For once, wealth, prestige and selective memory should not be enough to shield a powerful man from accountability.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73130246</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 18:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73130246/jesstaleyheadstocongress.mp3" length="10900001" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/413cc9fb-41d0-44e1-af1a-dbb30aac44a5/413cc9fb-41d0-44e1-af1a-dbb30aac44a5.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/413cc9fb-41d0-44e1-af1a-dbb30aac44a5/413cc9fb-41d0-44e1-af1a-dbb30aac44a5.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/413cc9fb-41d0-44e1-af1a-dbb30aac44a5/413cc9fb-41d0-44e1-af1a-dbb30aac44a5.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jes Staley’s appearance before Congress centers on the collapse of his long-running effort to portray his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein as distant, professional and misunderstood. The record suggests something far closer: years of communication,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jes Staley’s appearance before Congress centers on the collapse of his long-running effort to portray his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein as distant, professional and misunderstood. The record suggests something far closer: years of communication, visits, continued contact after Epstein’s 2008 conviction and descriptions of the relationship that went well beyond ordinary banker-client business. Staley has repeatedly leaned on selective memory and claims of ignorance, but those defenses are difficult to reconcile with his experience as one of the world’s most sophisticated financial executives. Regulators in Britain already concluded that he misleadingly characterized the relationship, and the documentary evidence has made his attempts to minimize it increasingly untenable.<br /><br />Congress now has an obligation to confront Staley with the emails, travel records, regulatory findings and contradictions he has spent years trying to explain away. His loss of status and career should not be confused with the suffering endured by Epstein’s victims, and he should not be allowed to recast himself as another casualty of Epstein’s deception. The central question is not whether Staley can survive another hearing with his reputation partially intact, but whether his narrative can survive direct comparison with the facts. For once, wealth, prestige and selective memory should not be enough to shield a powerful man from accountability.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>682</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Roza Gilles and the Abuse That Continued During Epstein’s Sentence (Part 2) (7/23/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/roza-gilles-and-the-abuse-that-continued-during-epstein-s-sentence-part-2-7-23-26--73111330</link><description><![CDATA[Roza Gilles was an 18-year-old aspiring model from Uzbekistan when she came to the United States in 2009 and became financially indebted to MC2 Model Management for her visa and housing. She was offered weekend administrative work at Jeffrey Epstein’s Florida Science Foundation office in West Palm Beach while Epstein was supposedly serving his jail sentence under an extraordinarily permissive work-release arrangement. Gilles said that during one of her first encounters with Epstein, he ordered her to undress, and when she froze, another woman removed her blouse and bra. She later realized that the device on Epstein’s ankle was a monitoring bracelet and that the man abusing her was technically still an inmate.<br /><br />Gilles’s account offers a disturbing illustration of how Epstein’s 2008 plea agreement and work-release privileges allowed him to continue operating in an environment filled with employees, vulnerable young women and even uniformed law-enforcement officers. She recalled seeing a sheriff at Epstein’s Palm Beach residence and concluding that Epstein was so protected that nothing she did could stop him. After eventually leaving his orbit, moving to New York and becoming financially independent, Gilles married, settled in the Midwest and became a fitness trainer. She is now speaking publicly in the hope that greater transparency will expose the people and institutions that enabled Epstein and finally deliver meaningful accountability for survivors.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.cnn.com/2026/07/20/politics/roza-gilles-jeffrey-epstein-victim-abuse" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Exclusive: Roza Gilles was an 18-year-old model when Jeffrey Epstein first abused her — while he was serving jail time | CNN Politics</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73111330</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73111330/roza2.mp3" length="15342907" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/967a2817-c973-4ac6-bf62-1a7863b4b529/967a2817-c973-4ac6-bf62-1a7863b4b529.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/967a2817-c973-4ac6-bf62-1a7863b4b529/967a2817-c973-4ac6-bf62-1a7863b4b529.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/967a2817-c973-4ac6-bf62-1a7863b4b529/967a2817-c973-4ac6-bf62-1a7863b4b529.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Roza Gilles was an 18-year-old aspiring model from Uzbekistan when she came to the United States in 2009 and became financially indebted to MC2 Model Management for her visa and housing. She was offered weekend administrative work at Jeffrey Epstein’s...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Roza Gilles was an 18-year-old aspiring model from Uzbekistan when she came to the United States in 2009 and became financially indebted to MC2 Model Management for her visa and housing. She was offered weekend administrative work at Jeffrey Epstein’s Florida Science Foundation office in West Palm Beach while Epstein was supposedly serving his jail sentence under an extraordinarily permissive work-release arrangement. Gilles said that during one of her first encounters with Epstein, he ordered her to undress, and when she froze, another woman removed her blouse and bra. She later realized that the device on Epstein’s ankle was a monitoring bracelet and that the man abusing her was technically still an inmate.<br /><br />Gilles’s account offers a disturbing illustration of how Epstein’s 2008 plea agreement and work-release privileges allowed him to continue operating in an environment filled with employees, vulnerable young women and even uniformed law-enforcement officers. She recalled seeing a sheriff at Epstein’s Palm Beach residence and concluding that Epstein was so protected that nothing she did could stop him. After eventually leaving his orbit, moving to New York and becoming financially independent, Gilles married, settled in the Midwest and became a fitness trainer. She is now speaking publicly in the hope that greater transparency will expose the people and institutions that enabled Epstein and finally deliver meaningful accountability for survivors.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.cnn.com/2026/07/20/politics/roza-gilles-jeffrey-epstein-victim-abuse" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Exclusive: Roza Gilles was an 18-year-old model when Jeffrey Epstein first abused her — while he was serving jail time | CNN Politics</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>959</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Roza Gilles and the Abuse That Continued During Epstein’s Sentence (Part 1) (7/23/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/roza-gilles-and-the-abuse-that-continued-during-epstein-s-sentence-part-1-7-23-26--73111331</link><description><![CDATA[Roza Gilles was an 18-year-old aspiring model from Uzbekistan when she came to the United States in 2009 and became financially indebted to MC2 Model Management for her visa and housing. She was offered weekend administrative work at Jeffrey Epstein’s Florida Science Foundation office in West Palm Beach while Epstein was supposedly serving his jail sentence under an extraordinarily permissive work-release arrangement. Gilles said that during one of her first encounters with Epstein, he ordered her to undress, and when she froze, another woman removed her blouse and bra. She later realized that the device on Epstein’s ankle was a monitoring bracelet and that the man abusing her was technically still an inmate.<br /><br />Gilles’s account offers a disturbing illustration of how Epstein’s 2008 plea agreement and work-release privileges allowed him to continue operating in an environment filled with employees, vulnerable young women and even uniformed law-enforcement officers. She recalled seeing a sheriff at Epstein’s Palm Beach residence and concluding that Epstein was so protected that nothing she did could stop him. After eventually leaving his orbit, moving to New York and becoming financially independent, Gilles married, settled in the Midwest and became a fitness trainer. She is now speaking publicly in the hope that greater transparency will expose the people and institutions that enabled Epstein and finally deliver meaningful accountability for survivors.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.cnn.com/2026/07/20/politics/roza-gilles-jeffrey-epstein-victim-abuse" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Exclusive: Roza Gilles was an 18-year-old model when Jeffrey Epstein first abused her — while he was serving jail time | CNN Politics</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73111331</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73111331/roza1.mp3" length="12950927" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/11ad4489-0c49-4234-a078-0bd9d29eb6e5/11ad4489-0c49-4234-a078-0bd9d29eb6e5.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/11ad4489-0c49-4234-a078-0bd9d29eb6e5/11ad4489-0c49-4234-a078-0bd9d29eb6e5.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/11ad4489-0c49-4234-a078-0bd9d29eb6e5/11ad4489-0c49-4234-a078-0bd9d29eb6e5.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Roza Gilles was an 18-year-old aspiring model from Uzbekistan when she came to the United States in 2009 and became financially indebted to MC2 Model Management for her visa and housing. She was offered weekend administrative work at Jeffrey Epstein’s...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Roza Gilles was an 18-year-old aspiring model from Uzbekistan when she came to the United States in 2009 and became financially indebted to MC2 Model Management for her visa and housing. She was offered weekend administrative work at Jeffrey Epstein’s Florida Science Foundation office in West Palm Beach while Epstein was supposedly serving his jail sentence under an extraordinarily permissive work-release arrangement. Gilles said that during one of her first encounters with Epstein, he ordered her to undress, and when she froze, another woman removed her blouse and bra. She later realized that the device on Epstein’s ankle was a monitoring bracelet and that the man abusing her was technically still an inmate.<br /><br />Gilles’s account offers a disturbing illustration of how Epstein’s 2008 plea agreement and work-release privileges allowed him to continue operating in an environment filled with employees, vulnerable young women and even uniformed law-enforcement officers. She recalled seeing a sheriff at Epstein’s Palm Beach residence and concluding that Epstein was so protected that nothing she did could stop him. After eventually leaving his orbit, moving to New York and becoming financially independent, Gilles married, settled in the Midwest and became a fitness trainer. She is now speaking publicly in the hope that greater transparency will expose the people and institutions that enabled Epstein and finally deliver meaningful accountability for survivors.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.cnn.com/2026/07/20/politics/roza-gilles-jeffrey-epstein-victim-abuse" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Exclusive: Roza Gilles was an 18-year-old model when Jeffrey Epstein first abused her — while he was serving jail time | CNN Politics</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>810</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Was Tyler Robinson at a Panguitch Steakhouse After Charlie Kirk’s Murder? (7/23/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/was-tyler-robinson-at-a-panguitch-steakhouse-after-charlie-kirk-s-murder-7-23-26--73111338</link><description><![CDATA[Restaurant employees in Panguitch, Utah, reported that a quiet man who ate alone at a local steakhouse on the night Charlie Kirk was killed resembled Tyler Robinson. The customer reportedly ordered a medium-rare sirloin with vegetables and a baked potato, and employees later contacted the FBI after seeing photographs of Robinson. Federal agents reportedly interviewed the owner and two servers, but the restaurant did not have surveillance footage clearly identifying the customer or a complete name connected to the payment card. Because Panguitch is more than three hours from Utah Valley University, the possible sighting raised questions about Robinson’s movements and the prosecution’s timeline.<br /><br />The claim remains unresolved because neither the FBI nor prosecutors have publicly confirmed whether the customer was Robinson. The restaurant owner has also said he was never told whether investigators were able to verify the sighting through payment records or other evidence. While the available information makes it appear unlikely that the steakhouse customer has been conclusively identified as Robinson, the lack of an official answer means the possibility has not been definitively ruled out. For now, the Panguitch sighting remains an unconfirmed lead rather than either a proven alibi or a fully disproven claim.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73111338</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 12:30:06 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73111338/robinsonsteakhouse.mp3" length="15159841" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c7668ae2-3f21-418c-8f54-435f4514b87f/c7668ae2-3f21-418c-8f54-435f4514b87f.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c7668ae2-3f21-418c-8f54-435f4514b87f/c7668ae2-3f21-418c-8f54-435f4514b87f.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c7668ae2-3f21-418c-8f54-435f4514b87f/c7668ae2-3f21-418c-8f54-435f4514b87f.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Restaurant employees in Panguitch, Utah, reported that a quiet man who ate alone at a local steakhouse on the night Charlie Kirk was killed resembled Tyler Robinson. The customer reportedly ordered a medium-rare sirloin with vegetables and a baked...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Restaurant employees in Panguitch, Utah, reported that a quiet man who ate alone at a local steakhouse on the night Charlie Kirk was killed resembled Tyler Robinson. The customer reportedly ordered a medium-rare sirloin with vegetables and a baked potato, and employees later contacted the FBI after seeing photographs of Robinson. Federal agents reportedly interviewed the owner and two servers, but the restaurant did not have surveillance footage clearly identifying the customer or a complete name connected to the payment card. Because Panguitch is more than three hours from Utah Valley University, the possible sighting raised questions about Robinson’s movements and the prosecution’s timeline.<br /><br />The claim remains unresolved because neither the FBI nor prosecutors have publicly confirmed whether the customer was Robinson. The restaurant owner has also said he was never told whether investigators were able to verify the sighting through payment records or other evidence. While the available information makes it appear unlikely that the steakhouse customer has been conclusively identified as Robinson, the lack of an official answer means the possibility has not been definitively ruled out. For now, the Panguitch sighting remains an unconfirmed lead rather than either a proven alibi or a fully disproven claim.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>948</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvu</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Will Donald Trump Pardon Ghislaine Maxwell?  (7/23/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-will-donald-trump-pardon-ghislaine-maxwell-7-23-26--73110149</link><description><![CDATA[A reporter asked Trump if he’d pardon Ghislaine Maxwell now that the Supreme Court killed her last appeal, and he immediately went into his usual “Who? Never heard of her” routine like he was auditioning for Men in Black. It was pure comedy—he acted like Ghislaine was some random lady who wandered into his photos by accident, not someone who used to orbit the same high-society circles as him and Epstein. The man delivered his line so confidently you’d think he really believed it: “I don’t know her, but I hear she’s doing well.” Yeah, sure, Don—she’s “doing well” in prison. Real cozy setup between chow line and lockdown. The guy could be caught holding a selfie stick with her and still swear it’s Photoshop and “fake news.”<br /><br />Trump’s selective amnesia is practically a stage show at this point. Every time one of his old pals gets indicted, he suddenly turns into a witness protection participant. “Never met them, don’t know them, wish them well.” It’s become a brand. The funniest part is how he says it with total confidence, like he’s daring the world to remember what he’s pretending to forget. When asked about a pardon, you could see the wheels spin—“What’s in it for me?”—but in true Trump fashion, he skipped the answer and rewrote history instead. Because in his world, he doesn’t need to pardon anyone; he just deletes them from existence. One minute you’re clinking glasses at Mar-a-Lago, the next you’re “Ghislaine who?”<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73110149</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 10:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73110149/megawilltrumppardonghislaine.mp3" length="31859400" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/dac09dcb-56d4-49b5-9e5c-86103eb82d6b/dac09dcb-56d4-49b5-9e5c-86103eb82d6b.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/dac09dcb-56d4-49b5-9e5c-86103eb82d6b/dac09dcb-56d4-49b5-9e5c-86103eb82d6b.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/dac09dcb-56d4-49b5-9e5c-86103eb82d6b/dac09dcb-56d4-49b5-9e5c-86103eb82d6b.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A reporter asked Trump if he’d pardon Ghislaine Maxwell now that the Supreme Court killed her last appeal, and he immediately went into his usual “Who? Never heard of her” routine like he was auditioning for Men in Black. It was pure comedy—he acted...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A reporter asked Trump if he’d pardon Ghislaine Maxwell now that the Supreme Court killed her last appeal, and he immediately went into his usual “Who? Never heard of her” routine like he was auditioning for Men in Black. It was pure comedy—he acted like Ghislaine was some random lady who wandered into his photos by accident, not someone who used to orbit the same high-society circles as him and Epstein. The man delivered his line so confidently you’d think he really believed it: “I don’t know her, but I hear she’s doing well.” Yeah, sure, Don—she’s “doing well” in prison. Real cozy setup between chow line and lockdown. The guy could be caught holding a selfie stick with her and still swear it’s Photoshop and “fake news.”<br /><br />Trump’s selective amnesia is practically a stage show at this point. Every time one of his old pals gets indicted, he suddenly turns into a witness protection participant. “Never met them, don’t know them, wish them well.” It’s become a brand. The funniest part is how he says it with total confidence, like he’s daring the world to remember what he’s pretending to forget. When asked about a pardon, you could see the wheels spin—“What’s in it for me?”—but in true Trump fashion, he skipped the answer and rewrote history instead. Because in his world, he doesn’t need to pardon anyone; he just deletes them from existence. One minute you’re clinking glasses at Mar-a-Lago, the next you’re “Ghislaine who?”<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1992</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   Leon Black's Narrative Versus The Record (7/23/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-leon-black-s-narrative-versus-the-record-7-23-26--73110131</link><description><![CDATA[Leon Black has tried to portray his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein as primarily professional, limited to sophisticated tax and estate-planning work, while insisting that he knew nothing about Epstein’s criminal activities and eventually realized Epstein had deceived and overcharged him. The record, however, points to a relationship that was far more extensive and personal than that description suggests. Black paid Epstein approximately $158 million between 2012 and 2017, years after Epstein had pleaded guilty to soliciting a minor, and also directed a $10 million donation to an Epstein-linked charity. Black continued consulting Epstein on personal matters, including disputes involving women, while documents show Epstein acting as an intermediary in sensitive situations. Black’s claim that Epstein was not truly a close friend is also difficult to reconcile with his contribution to Epstein’s 2003 birthday album, where he referred to him as a “dear friend,” joked about Epstein’s interest in women and signed the message “love and kisses.”<br /><br />The inconsistencies became even more pronounced during Black’s congressional questioning. While presenting himself as fully cooperative and eager to clear the record, he and his attorneys refused to answer questions about nondisclosure agreements, settlements and the number of women with whom he had entered confidential arrangements. That resistance prompted lawmakers to issue subpoenas for documents and additional sworn testimony. Black has denied all allegations of sexual misconduct and no criminal charges have been brought against him in connection with Epstein, but his carefully narrowed account does not comfortably match the scale of the payments, the duration of the association, the personal communications or his continued reliance on Epstein after the financier’s conviction. The central problem with Black’s narrative is not simply that he associated with Epstein; it is that he repeatedly minimizes a relationship that the documentary record portrays as financially enormous, socially familiar and deeply intertwined with his private affairs.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73110131</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73110131/megaleonblackversustherecord.mp3" length="43997801" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6ae11e39-3226-415d-bec7-ea1559308115/6ae11e39-3226-415d-bec7-ea1559308115.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6ae11e39-3226-415d-bec7-ea1559308115/6ae11e39-3226-415d-bec7-ea1559308115.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6ae11e39-3226-415d-bec7-ea1559308115/6ae11e39-3226-415d-bec7-ea1559308115.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Leon Black has tried to portray his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein as primarily professional, limited to sophisticated tax and estate-planning work, while insisting that he knew nothing about Epstein’s criminal activities and eventually realized...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Leon Black has tried to portray his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein as primarily professional, limited to sophisticated tax and estate-planning work, while insisting that he knew nothing about Epstein’s criminal activities and eventually realized Epstein had deceived and overcharged him. The record, however, points to a relationship that was far more extensive and personal than that description suggests. Black paid Epstein approximately $158 million between 2012 and 2017, years after Epstein had pleaded guilty to soliciting a minor, and also directed a $10 million donation to an Epstein-linked charity. Black continued consulting Epstein on personal matters, including disputes involving women, while documents show Epstein acting as an intermediary in sensitive situations. Black’s claim that Epstein was not truly a close friend is also difficult to reconcile with his contribution to Epstein’s 2003 birthday album, where he referred to him as a “dear friend,” joked about Epstein’s interest in women and signed the message “love and kisses.”<br /><br />The inconsistencies became even more pronounced during Black’s congressional questioning. While presenting himself as fully cooperative and eager to clear the record, he and his attorneys refused to answer questions about nondisclosure agreements, settlements and the number of women with whom he had entered confidential arrangements. That resistance prompted lawmakers to issue subpoenas for documents and additional sworn testimony. Black has denied all allegations of sexual misconduct and no criminal charges have been brought against him in connection with Epstein, but his carefully narrowed account does not comfortably match the scale of the payments, the duration of the association, the personal communications or his continued reliance on Epstein after the financier’s conviction. The central problem with Black’s narrative is not simply that he associated with Epstein; it is that he repeatedly minimizes a relationship that the documentary record portrays as financially enormous, socially familiar and deeply intertwined with his private affairs.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2750</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The FBI And Their Epstein Related Accountability Problem (7/23/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-fbi-and-their-epstein-related-accountability-problem-7-23-26--73110130</link><description><![CDATA[<br />The FBI’s Epstein-related accountability problem stretches back to at least 1996, when Maria Farmer reported allegations involving Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and the exploitation of underage girls. The complaint was documented, yet no prosecution followed, and Epstein was allowed to continue operating for years before Palm Beach police opened a new investigation in 2005. Even after the FBI developed a federal case involving numerous alleged victims, the matter was resolved through a secret non-prosecution agreement that spared Epstein from federal charges, protected potential co-conspirators and kept survivors uninformed. Epstein instead pleaded guilty to lesser state offenses and served only 13 months under unusually permissive conditions. A later Justice Department review criticized the handling of the case but largely avoided findings of professional misconduct, reinforcing the impression that institutional failure was acknowledged without anyone being meaningfully held responsible.<br /><br />The same pattern continued after Epstein’s 2019 arrest, when the FBI and Justice Department possessed enormous quantities of evidence but produced remarkably little additional accountability beyond the prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell. Epstein died before trial amid catastrophic failures at the federal jail holding him, while questions remained about his associates, recruiters, financial network and the evidence accumulated during decades of investigations. Subsequent document releases revealed how much information had been collected, yet survivors and the public were still left asking why earlier warnings were ignored, why obvious investigative avenues appeared to stall and why so few people faced charges. The FBI has repeatedly positioned itself as ready to receive new information, but critics argue that the central problem is not a lack of tips; it is the bureau’s failure to explain what it did with the evidence it already had. After three decades, there has still been no comprehensive public accounting of who made the crucial decisions, why the investigations repeatedly stopped short and whether anyone inside the institution suffered consequences for allowing Epstein’s operation to continue.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73110130</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 06:30:01 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73110130/megafbiepsteinaccountabilityproblem.mp3" length="52606894" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/25d47f70-8fa5-420f-9705-772ee705f718/25d47f70-8fa5-420f-9705-772ee705f718.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/25d47f70-8fa5-420f-9705-772ee705f718/25d47f70-8fa5-420f-9705-772ee705f718.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/25d47f70-8fa5-420f-9705-772ee705f718/25d47f70-8fa5-420f-9705-772ee705f718.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The FBI’s Epstein-related accountability problem stretches back to at least 1996, when Maria Farmer reported allegations involving Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and the exploitation of underage girls. The complaint was documented, yet no...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br />The FBI’s Epstein-related accountability problem stretches back to at least 1996, when Maria Farmer reported allegations involving Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and the exploitation of underage girls. The complaint was documented, yet no prosecution followed, and Epstein was allowed to continue operating for years before Palm Beach police opened a new investigation in 2005. Even after the FBI developed a federal case involving numerous alleged victims, the matter was resolved through a secret non-prosecution agreement that spared Epstein from federal charges, protected potential co-conspirators and kept survivors uninformed. Epstein instead pleaded guilty to lesser state offenses and served only 13 months under unusually permissive conditions. A later Justice Department review criticized the handling of the case but largely avoided findings of professional misconduct, reinforcing the impression that institutional failure was acknowledged without anyone being meaningfully held responsible.<br /><br />The same pattern continued after Epstein’s 2019 arrest, when the FBI and Justice Department possessed enormous quantities of evidence but produced remarkably little additional accountability beyond the prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell. Epstein died before trial amid catastrophic failures at the federal jail holding him, while questions remained about his associates, recruiters, financial network and the evidence accumulated during decades of investigations. Subsequent document releases revealed how much information had been collected, yet survivors and the public were still left asking why earlier warnings were ignored, why obvious investigative avenues appeared to stall and why so few people faced charges. The FBI has repeatedly positioned itself as ready to receive new information, but critics argue that the central problem is not a lack of tips; it is the bureau’s failure to explain what it did with the evidence it already had. After three decades, there has still been no comprehensive public accounting of who made the crucial decisions, why the investigations repeatedly stopped short and whether anyone inside the institution suffered consequences for allowing Epstein’s operation to continue.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3288</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Jane Doe # 17 And Her Claims Against Jeffrey Epstein And His Estate (Part 2)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/jane-doe-17-and-her-claims-against-jeffrey-epstein-and-his-estate-part-2--73093511</link><description><![CDATA[The trip into the underbelly of the Epstein operation continues in this episode as we begin our look at Jane Doe # 17 and her MANY allegations against Jeffrey Epstein and his companies. <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.vicourts.org/common/pages/DisplayFile.aspx?itemId=16519327" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">DisplayFile.aspx (vicourts.org)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73093511</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73093511/janedoe17prt2.mp3" length="13377662" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e60b0b05-fb46-4a0b-be85-2980b8c6fe5d/e60b0b05-fb46-4a0b-be85-2980b8c6fe5d.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e60b0b05-fb46-4a0b-be85-2980b8c6fe5d/e60b0b05-fb46-4a0b-be85-2980b8c6fe5d.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e60b0b05-fb46-4a0b-be85-2980b8c6fe5d/e60b0b05-fb46-4a0b-be85-2980b8c6fe5d.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The trip into the underbelly of the Epstein operation continues in this episode as we begin our look at Jane Doe # 17 and her MANY allegations against Jeffrey Epstein and his companies. 





to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The trip into the underbelly of the Epstein operation continues in this episode as we begin our look at Jane Doe # 17 and her MANY allegations against Jeffrey Epstein and his companies. <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.vicourts.org/common/pages/DisplayFile.aspx?itemId=16519327" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">DisplayFile.aspx (vicourts.org)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>837</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Jane Doe # 17 And Her Claims Against Jeffrey Epstein And His Estate (Part 1)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/jane-doe-17-and-her-claims-against-jeffrey-epstein-and-his-estate-part-1--73093509</link><description><![CDATA[The trip into the underbelly of the Epstein operation continues in this episode as we begin our look at Jane Doe # 17 and her MANY allegations against Jeffrey Epstein and his companies. <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.vicourts.org/common/pages/DisplayFile.aspx?itemId=16519327" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">DisplayFile.aspx (vicourts.org)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73093509</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73093509/janedoe17prt1.mp3" length="15658047" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9fbe03f4-4720-49b2-ad86-42ac42284e31/9fbe03f4-4720-49b2-ad86-42ac42284e31.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9fbe03f4-4720-49b2-ad86-42ac42284e31/9fbe03f4-4720-49b2-ad86-42ac42284e31.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9fbe03f4-4720-49b2-ad86-42ac42284e31/9fbe03f4-4720-49b2-ad86-42ac42284e31.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The trip into the underbelly of the Epstein operation continues in this episode as we begin our look at Jane Doe # 17 and her MANY allegations against Jeffrey Epstein and his companies. 





to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The trip into the underbelly of the Epstein operation continues in this episode as we begin our look at Jane Doe # 17 and her MANY allegations against Jeffrey Epstein and his companies. <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.vicourts.org/common/pages/DisplayFile.aspx?itemId=16519327" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">DisplayFile.aspx (vicourts.org)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>979</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s Deposition in Edwards and Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz (Part 10)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/virginia-roberts-giuffre-s-deposition-in-edwards-and-cassell-v-alan-dershowitz-part-10--73068645</link><description><![CDATA[The videotaped deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre taken on January 16, 2016, in Fort Lauderdale sits at the center of the bitter legal war between Epstein survivors’ attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell and Alan Dershowitz, who was accused by Giuffre of sexually abusing her when she was a minor trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein. In the deposition, Giuffre gives a detailed, sworn narrative of how she was recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell, groomed, trafficked to powerful men, and moved across multiple jurisdictions while still underage. She identifies Epstein’s residences, flight patterns, intermediaries, and specific encounters, placing her allegations firmly inside the broader trafficking structure rather than as isolated claims. The testimony was preserved on video precisely because her lawyers anticipated that credibility, consistency, and demeanor would become central issues in the defamation battle that followed. It also captured Giuffre under oath before years of public pressure, media narratives, and evolving legal strategies could reshape the record.<br /><br />What made this deposition legally explosive was its direct role in the defamation and civil litigation between Dershowitz and the Edwards–Cassell team, after Giuffre publicly accused Dershowitz and he responded with an aggressive campaign claiming she had fabricated the allegations and falsely implicated him. The video became a critical piece of evidence in determining whether Giuffre’s statements were knowingly false or grounded in a consistent trafficking account supported by contemporaneous detail. Dershowitz’s lawyers later argued that contradictions, memory gaps, and timeline disputes undermined her credibility, while Giuffre’s side pointed to the overall coherence of her narrative and the corroborating travel and contact records emerging in parallel cases. Long before the unsealing battles and public reckonings, this deposition quietly locked in one of the earliest comprehensive sworn accounts of Epstein’s trafficking network—and the legal fault line that would later fracture the reputations of some of the most powerful lawyers and institutions tied to the case.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Giuffre%20v.%20Maxwell,%20No.%20115-cv-07433%20(S.D.N.Y.%202015)/1257-12.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1257-12.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73068645</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73068645/virginiadershdeposition10_2.mp3" length="14292158" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/fd8b0093-2e71-4cbc-9d6f-a90dd7c9a26b/fd8b0093-2e71-4cbc-9d6f-a90dd7c9a26b.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/fd8b0093-2e71-4cbc-9d6f-a90dd7c9a26b/fd8b0093-2e71-4cbc-9d6f-a90dd7c9a26b.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/fd8b0093-2e71-4cbc-9d6f-a90dd7c9a26b/fd8b0093-2e71-4cbc-9d6f-a90dd7c9a26b.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The videotaped deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre taken on January 16, 2016, in Fort Lauderdale sits at the center of the bitter legal war between Epstein survivors’ attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell and Alan Dershowitz, who was accused...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The videotaped deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre taken on January 16, 2016, in Fort Lauderdale sits at the center of the bitter legal war between Epstein survivors’ attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell and Alan Dershowitz, who was accused by Giuffre of sexually abusing her when she was a minor trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein. In the deposition, Giuffre gives a detailed, sworn narrative of how she was recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell, groomed, trafficked to powerful men, and moved across multiple jurisdictions while still underage. She identifies Epstein’s residences, flight patterns, intermediaries, and specific encounters, placing her allegations firmly inside the broader trafficking structure rather than as isolated claims. The testimony was preserved on video precisely because her lawyers anticipated that credibility, consistency, and demeanor would become central issues in the defamation battle that followed. It also captured Giuffre under oath before years of public pressure, media narratives, and evolving legal strategies could reshape the record.<br /><br />What made this deposition legally explosive was its direct role in the defamation and civil litigation between Dershowitz and the Edwards–Cassell team, after Giuffre publicly accused Dershowitz and he responded with an aggressive campaign claiming she had fabricated the allegations and falsely implicated him. The video became a critical piece of evidence in determining whether Giuffre’s statements were knowingly false or grounded in a consistent trafficking account supported by contemporaneous detail. Dershowitz’s lawyers later argued that contradictions, memory gaps, and timeline disputes undermined her credibility, while Giuffre’s side pointed to the overall coherence of her narrative and the corroborating travel and contact records emerging in parallel cases. Long before the unsealing battles and public reckonings, this deposition quietly locked in one of the earliest comprehensive sworn accounts of Epstein’s trafficking network—and the legal fault line that would later fracture the reputations of some of the most powerful lawyers and institutions tied to the case.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Giuffre%20v.%20Maxwell,%20No.%20115-cv-07433%20(S.D.N.Y.%202015)/1257-12.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1257-12.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>894</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s Deposition in Edwards and Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz (Part 9)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/virginia-roberts-giuffre-s-deposition-in-edwards-and-cassell-v-alan-dershowitz-part-9--73068644</link><description><![CDATA[The videotaped deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre taken on January 16, 2016, in Fort Lauderdale sits at the center of the bitter legal war between Epstein survivors’ attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell and Alan Dershowitz, who was accused by Giuffre of sexually abusing her when she was a minor trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein. In the deposition, Giuffre gives a detailed, sworn narrative of how she was recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell, groomed, trafficked to powerful men, and moved across multiple jurisdictions while still underage. She identifies Epstein’s residences, flight patterns, intermediaries, and specific encounters, placing her allegations firmly inside the broader trafficking structure rather than as isolated claims. The testimony was preserved on video precisely because her lawyers anticipated that credibility, consistency, and demeanor would become central issues in the defamation battle that followed. It also captured Giuffre under oath before years of public pressure, media narratives, and evolving legal strategies could reshape the record.<br /><br />What made this deposition legally explosive was its direct role in the defamation and civil litigation between Dershowitz and the Edwards–Cassell team, after Giuffre publicly accused Dershowitz and he responded with an aggressive campaign claiming she had fabricated the allegations and falsely implicated him. The video became a critical piece of evidence in determining whether Giuffre’s statements were knowingly false or grounded in a consistent trafficking account supported by contemporaneous detail. Dershowitz’s lawyers later argued that contradictions, memory gaps, and timeline disputes undermined her credibility, while Giuffre’s side pointed to the overall coherence of her narrative and the corroborating travel and contact records emerging in parallel cases. Long before the unsealing battles and public reckonings, this deposition quietly locked in one of the earliest comprehensive sworn accounts of Epstein’s trafficking network—and the legal fault line that would later fracture the reputations of some of the most powerful lawyers and institutions tied to the case.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Giuffre%20v.%20Maxwell,%20No.%20115-cv-07433%20(S.D.N.Y.%202015)/1257-12.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1257-12.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73068644</guid><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73068644/virginiadershdeposition9_2.mp3" length="12018460" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/81aaf048-7dee-4685-a5b2-9332f7f466c0/81aaf048-7dee-4685-a5b2-9332f7f466c0.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/81aaf048-7dee-4685-a5b2-9332f7f466c0/81aaf048-7dee-4685-a5b2-9332f7f466c0.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/81aaf048-7dee-4685-a5b2-9332f7f466c0/81aaf048-7dee-4685-a5b2-9332f7f466c0.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The videotaped deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre taken on January 16, 2016, in Fort Lauderdale sits at the center of the bitter legal war between Epstein survivors’ attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell and Alan Dershowitz, who was accused...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The videotaped deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre taken on January 16, 2016, in Fort Lauderdale sits at the center of the bitter legal war between Epstein survivors’ attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell and Alan Dershowitz, who was accused by Giuffre of sexually abusing her when she was a minor trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein. In the deposition, Giuffre gives a detailed, sworn narrative of how she was recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell, groomed, trafficked to powerful men, and moved across multiple jurisdictions while still underage. She identifies Epstein’s residences, flight patterns, intermediaries, and specific encounters, placing her allegations firmly inside the broader trafficking structure rather than as isolated claims. The testimony was preserved on video precisely because her lawyers anticipated that credibility, consistency, and demeanor would become central issues in the defamation battle that followed. It also captured Giuffre under oath before years of public pressure, media narratives, and evolving legal strategies could reshape the record.<br /><br />What made this deposition legally explosive was its direct role in the defamation and civil litigation between Dershowitz and the Edwards–Cassell team, after Giuffre publicly accused Dershowitz and he responded with an aggressive campaign claiming she had fabricated the allegations and falsely implicated him. The video became a critical piece of evidence in determining whether Giuffre’s statements were knowingly false or grounded in a consistent trafficking account supported by contemporaneous detail. Dershowitz’s lawyers later argued that contradictions, memory gaps, and timeline disputes undermined her credibility, while Giuffre’s side pointed to the overall coherence of her narrative and the corroborating travel and contact records emerging in parallel cases. Long before the unsealing battles and public reckonings, this deposition quietly locked in one of the earliest comprehensive sworn accounts of Epstein’s trafficking network—and the legal fault line that would later fracture the reputations of some of the most powerful lawyers and institutions tied to the case.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Giuffre%20v.%20Maxwell,%20No.%20115-cv-07433%20(S.D.N.Y.%202015)/1257-12.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1257-12.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>752</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Tyler Robinson And The Alleged Confession To Lance Twiggs (7/22/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-and-the-alleged-confession-to-lance-twiggs-7-22-26--73110101</link><description><![CDATA[The alleged confession to Lance Twiggs is among the strongest publicly available pieces of evidence because it is not presented as a vague secondhand rumor or an isolated statement stripped of context. Twiggs told investigators that Robinson sent messages accepting responsibility for Charlie Kirk’s killing, then confirmed the admission face-to-face the following day when Twiggs asked whether what he had written was true. According to the recorded interview played during the preliminary hearing, Robinson became emotional, said he wished he had not done it and discussed surrendering to authorities. Prosecutors also presented an alleged handwritten note left for Twiggs and text messages discussing Robinson’s motive, the engraved ammunition and his concern about recovering the abandoned rifle. Taken together, those statements allegedly describe conduct before, during and after the shooting in language attributable directly to Robinson rather than merely placing him near the scene.<br /><br />The confession is especially significant because several details reportedly correspond with independently discovered evidence. Robinson’s alleged messages referred to the rifle, the engraved rounds and the possibility that his DNA remained on the weapon, while investigators later recovered a rifle and ammunition matching important parts of that account and presented forensic evidence connecting him to those items. Twiggs also reportedly told investigators that Robinson had begun engraving bullets weeks before the killing, providing potential evidence of preparation rather than a spontaneous admission invented after the fact. A confession can always be challenged on authenticity, interpretation or witness credibility, and Twiggs received immunity before cooperating, but the prosecution does not appear to be relying on his word alone. The alleged admission is powerful because it functions as a narrative thread connecting motive, planning, the weapon, the physical evidence, Robinson’s movements after the shooting and his eventual surrender.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://nypost.com/2026/07/09/us-news/tyler-robinsons-trans-lover-lance-twiggs-seen-in-police-interview-shown-in-court-for-first-time/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lance Twiggs recalled moment Tyler Robinson allegedly confessed to shooting Charlie Kirk</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73110101</guid><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73110101/twiggsrobinsonconfession.mp3" length="16315080" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/516e2263-312c-4ce9-a11a-f92fa614193d/516e2263-312c-4ce9-a11a-f92fa614193d.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/516e2263-312c-4ce9-a11a-f92fa614193d/516e2263-312c-4ce9-a11a-f92fa614193d.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/516e2263-312c-4ce9-a11a-f92fa614193d/516e2263-312c-4ce9-a11a-f92fa614193d.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The alleged confession to Lance Twiggs is among the strongest publicly available pieces of evidence because it is not presented as a vague secondhand rumor or an isolated statement stripped of context. Twiggs told investigators that Robinson sent...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The alleged confession to Lance Twiggs is among the strongest publicly available pieces of evidence because it is not presented as a vague secondhand rumor or an isolated statement stripped of context. Twiggs told investigators that Robinson sent messages accepting responsibility for Charlie Kirk’s killing, then confirmed the admission face-to-face the following day when Twiggs asked whether what he had written was true. According to the recorded interview played during the preliminary hearing, Robinson became emotional, said he wished he had not done it and discussed surrendering to authorities. Prosecutors also presented an alleged handwritten note left for Twiggs and text messages discussing Robinson’s motive, the engraved ammunition and his concern about recovering the abandoned rifle. Taken together, those statements allegedly describe conduct before, during and after the shooting in language attributable directly to Robinson rather than merely placing him near the scene.<br /><br />The confession is especially significant because several details reportedly correspond with independently discovered evidence. Robinson’s alleged messages referred to the rifle, the engraved rounds and the possibility that his DNA remained on the weapon, while investigators later recovered a rifle and ammunition matching important parts of that account and presented forensic evidence connecting him to those items. Twiggs also reportedly told investigators that Robinson had begun engraving bullets weeks before the killing, providing potential evidence of preparation rather than a spontaneous admission invented after the fact. A confession can always be challenged on authenticity, interpretation or witness credibility, and Twiggs received immunity before cooperating, but the prosecution does not appear to be relying on his word alone. The alleged admission is powerful because it functions as a narrative thread connecting motive, planning, the weapon, the physical evidence, Robinson’s movements after the shooting and his eventual surrender.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://nypost.com/2026/07/09/us-news/tyler-robinsons-trans-lover-lance-twiggs-seen-in-police-interview-shown-in-court-for-first-time/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lance Twiggs recalled moment Tyler Robinson allegedly confessed to shooting Charlie Kirk</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1020</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvu</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Anya’s Account of Life Inside Jeffrey Epstein’s Cult (Part 2) (7/22/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/anya-s-account-of-life-inside-jeffrey-epstein-s-cult-part-2-7-22-26--73075894</link><description><![CDATA[A former Epstein assistant identified as “Anya” describes how she was drawn into his orbit through a modeling contact in Paris and promises that he could advance her career. Instead, she says Epstein gradually built what she calls an “ecosystem of abuse,” housing roughly a dozen female assistants, controlling their money, healthcare and employment, demanding constant availability and repeatedly sexually abusing them. He allegedly studied each woman’s vulnerabilities, isolated them from outside support, created rivalries within the group and used threats, financial dependency and powerful social connections to make resistance feel impossible. Anya says Epstein openly compared the operation to a cult with himself as its leader, maintaining control without physically imprisoning the women.<br /><br />Anya alleges that Epstein collected compromising photographs and videos, required women to write gratitude letters and pursued assistants who tried to leave, including one woman he claimed owed him $700,000. She also says he ordered her to undergo surgery to cut a small tattoo from her body rather than wait for laser removal, leaving permanent scars and forcing her to repeat the procedure when he disliked the result. The women were allegedly pressured to recruit others, trapping them in a cycle where victimization and coerced participation became intertwined. Anya says Epstein’s relationships with wealthy and prominent figures further legitimized him in the eyes of those he controlled, making them question their own instincts and fear that nobody would believe them.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/control-threats-disfiguring-surgery-my-life-inside-jeffrey-epstein-s-cult/ar-AA28abT0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Control, threats, disfiguring surgery: My life inside Jeffrey Epstein's 'cult'</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73075894</guid><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 18:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73075894/anya2.mp3" length="19129199" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/53c91337-2b20-434a-bfe7-3b4920eab137/53c91337-2b20-434a-bfe7-3b4920eab137.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/53c91337-2b20-434a-bfe7-3b4920eab137/53c91337-2b20-434a-bfe7-3b4920eab137.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/53c91337-2b20-434a-bfe7-3b4920eab137/53c91337-2b20-434a-bfe7-3b4920eab137.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A former Epstein assistant identified as “Anya” describes how she was drawn into his orbit through a modeling contact in Paris and promises that he could advance her career. Instead, she says Epstein gradually built what she calls an “ecosystem of...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A former Epstein assistant identified as “Anya” describes how she was drawn into his orbit through a modeling contact in Paris and promises that he could advance her career. Instead, she says Epstein gradually built what she calls an “ecosystem of abuse,” housing roughly a dozen female assistants, controlling their money, healthcare and employment, demanding constant availability and repeatedly sexually abusing them. He allegedly studied each woman’s vulnerabilities, isolated them from outside support, created rivalries within the group and used threats, financial dependency and powerful social connections to make resistance feel impossible. Anya says Epstein openly compared the operation to a cult with himself as its leader, maintaining control without physically imprisoning the women.<br /><br />Anya alleges that Epstein collected compromising photographs and videos, required women to write gratitude letters and pursued assistants who tried to leave, including one woman he claimed owed him $700,000. She also says he ordered her to undergo surgery to cut a small tattoo from her body rather than wait for laser removal, leaving permanent scars and forcing her to repeat the procedure when he disliked the result. The women were allegedly pressured to recruit others, trapping them in a cycle where victimization and coerced participation became intertwined. Anya says Epstein’s relationships with wealthy and prominent figures further legitimized him in the eyes of those he controlled, making them question their own instincts and fear that nobody would believe them.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/control-threats-disfiguring-surgery-my-life-inside-jeffrey-epstein-s-cult/ar-AA28abT0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Control, threats, disfiguring surgery: My life inside Jeffrey Epstein's 'cult'</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1196</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Anya’s Account of Life Inside Jeffrey Epstein’s Cult (Part 1) (7/22/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/anya-s-account-of-life-inside-jeffrey-epstein-s-cult-part-1-7-22-26--73075892</link><description><![CDATA[A former Epstein assistant identified as “Anya” describes how she was drawn into his orbit through a modeling contact in Paris and promises that he could advance her career. Instead, she says Epstein gradually built what she calls an “ecosystem of abuse,” housing roughly a dozen female assistants, controlling their money, healthcare and employment, demanding constant availability and repeatedly sexually abusing them. He allegedly studied each woman’s vulnerabilities, isolated them from outside support, created rivalries within the group and used threats, financial dependency and powerful social connections to make resistance feel impossible. Anya says Epstein openly compared the operation to a cult with himself as its leader, maintaining control without physically imprisoning the women.<br /><br />Anya alleges that Epstein collected compromising photographs and videos, required women to write gratitude letters and pursued assistants who tried to leave, including one woman he claimed owed him $700,000. She also says he ordered her to undergo surgery to cut a small tattoo from her body rather than wait for laser removal, leaving permanent scars and forcing her to repeat the procedure when he disliked the result. The women were allegedly pressured to recruit others, trapping them in a cycle where victimization and coerced participation became intertwined. Anya says Epstein’s relationships with wealthy and prominent figures further legitimized him in the eyes of those he controlled, making them question their own instincts and fear that nobody would believe them.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/control-threats-disfiguring-surgery-my-life-inside-jeffrey-epstein-s-cult/ar-AA28abT0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Control, threats, disfiguring surgery: My life inside Jeffrey Epstein's 'cult'</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73075892</guid><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73075892/anya1.mp3" length="17183182" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/dcf788f7-a471-4120-9dfb-70ef7142d7e6/dcf788f7-a471-4120-9dfb-70ef7142d7e6.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/dcf788f7-a471-4120-9dfb-70ef7142d7e6/dcf788f7-a471-4120-9dfb-70ef7142d7e6.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/dcf788f7-a471-4120-9dfb-70ef7142d7e6/dcf788f7-a471-4120-9dfb-70ef7142d7e6.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A former Epstein assistant identified as “Anya” describes how she was drawn into his orbit through a modeling contact in Paris and promises that he could advance her career. Instead, she says Epstein gradually built what she calls an “ecosystem of...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A former Epstein assistant identified as “Anya” describes how she was drawn into his orbit through a modeling contact in Paris and promises that he could advance her career. Instead, she says Epstein gradually built what she calls an “ecosystem of abuse,” housing roughly a dozen female assistants, controlling their money, healthcare and employment, demanding constant availability and repeatedly sexually abusing them. He allegedly studied each woman’s vulnerabilities, isolated them from outside support, created rivalries within the group and used threats, financial dependency and powerful social connections to make resistance feel impossible. Anya says Epstein openly compared the operation to a cult with himself as its leader, maintaining control without physically imprisoning the women.<br /><br />Anya alleges that Epstein collected compromising photographs and videos, required women to write gratitude letters and pursued assistants who tried to leave, including one woman he claimed owed him $700,000. She also says he ordered her to undergo surgery to cut a small tattoo from her body rather than wait for laser removal, leaving permanent scars and forcing her to repeat the procedure when he disliked the result. The women were allegedly pressured to recruit others, trapping them in a cycle where victimization and coerced participation became intertwined. Anya says Epstein’s relationships with wealthy and prominent figures further legitimized him in the eyes of those he controlled, making them question their own instincts and fear that nobody would believe them.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/control-threats-disfiguring-surgery-my-life-inside-jeffrey-epstein-s-cult/ar-AA28abT0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Control, threats, disfiguring surgery: My life inside Jeffrey Epstein's 'cult'</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1074</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Leon Black And His Epstein Related Congressional Transcript (Part 4) (7/21/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/leon-black-and-his-epstein-related-congressional-transcript-part-4-7-21-26--73075893</link><description><![CDATA[Leon Black used his appearance before the House Oversight Committee to defend his long-running relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and explain the extraordinary $158 million he paid him between 2013 and 2017. Black maintained that the money purchased legitimate tax, estate-planning and family-office services that allegedly saved him between $1 billion and $2 billion. He said Epstein deceived him about the deductibility of his fees, exaggerated his influence and repeatedly demanded more money, eventually causing Black to end their relationship in 2018. Black denied knowing about Epstein’s trafficking operation, abusing any woman, having sex with anyone underage, paying Epstein for access to women or being blackmailed by him. At the same time, he acknowledged spending considerable time around Epstein, meeting prominent figures through him and contributing a birthday poem describing Epstein’s interest in attractive women around the world. Although Black later insisted Epstein was not a “dear friend,” the birthday message itself called him exactly that and was signed “love and kisses.”<br /><br />The questioning became confrontational when committee investigators turned to Black’s relationships with women and nondisclosure agreements. Black acknowledged a six-year extramarital affair and confirmed a settlement that included monthly payments, loan forgiveness and money connected to a British visa, while saying he regarded the woman’s demands as blackmail and had discussed the situation with Epstein. He and his attorneys then refused to disclose how many NDAs he had signed, their terms or who else in his social circle had such agreements, arguing that confidentiality provisions prevented him from answering during a voluntary interview. Committee officials rejected that position and served Black with subpoenas for relevant documents and a later deposition. His lawyers denounced the move as a political stunt and abruptly ended the interview before lawmakers could fully question him about the $158 million in payments or the broader allegations surrounding his association with Epstein.<br /><br /><br />To contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73075893</guid><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 14:30:01 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73075893/blacktranscript4.mp3" length="12139250" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/bfae8708-5d6c-4849-bcf0-2e7ec7cfdbb4/bfae8708-5d6c-4849-bcf0-2e7ec7cfdbb4.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/bfae8708-5d6c-4849-bcf0-2e7ec7cfdbb4/bfae8708-5d6c-4849-bcf0-2e7ec7cfdbb4.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/bfae8708-5d6c-4849-bcf0-2e7ec7cfdbb4/bfae8708-5d6c-4849-bcf0-2e7ec7cfdbb4.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Leon Black used his appearance before the House Oversight Committee to defend his long-running relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and explain the extraordinary $158 million he paid him between 2013 and 2017. Black maintained that the money purchased...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Leon Black used his appearance before the House Oversight Committee to defend his long-running relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and explain the extraordinary $158 million he paid him between 2013 and 2017. Black maintained that the money purchased legitimate tax, estate-planning and family-office services that allegedly saved him between $1 billion and $2 billion. He said Epstein deceived him about the deductibility of his fees, exaggerated his influence and repeatedly demanded more money, eventually causing Black to end their relationship in 2018. Black denied knowing about Epstein’s trafficking operation, abusing any woman, having sex with anyone underage, paying Epstein for access to women or being blackmailed by him. At the same time, he acknowledged spending considerable time around Epstein, meeting prominent figures through him and contributing a birthday poem describing Epstein’s interest in attractive women around the world. Although Black later insisted Epstein was not a “dear friend,” the birthday message itself called him exactly that and was signed “love and kisses.”<br /><br />The questioning became confrontational when committee investigators turned to Black’s relationships with women and nondisclosure agreements. Black acknowledged a six-year extramarital affair and confirmed a settlement that included monthly payments, loan forgiveness and money connected to a British visa, while saying he regarded the woman’s demands as blackmail and had discussed the situation with Epstein. He and his attorneys then refused to disclose how many NDAs he had signed, their terms or who else in his social circle had such agreements, arguing that confidentiality provisions prevented him from answering during a voluntary interview. Committee officials rejected that position and served Black with subpoenas for relevant documents and a later deposition. His lawyers denounced the move as a political stunt and abruptly ended the interview before lawmakers could fully question him about the $158 million in payments or the broader allegations surrounding his association with Epstein.<br /><br /><br />To contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>759</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Leon Black And His Epstein Related Congressional Transcript (Part 3) (7/21/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/leon-black-and-his-epstein-related-congressional-transcript-part-3-7-21-26--73075897</link><description><![CDATA[Leon Black used his appearance before the House Oversight Committee to defend his long-running relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and explain the extraordinary $158 million he paid him between 2013 and 2017. Black maintained that the money purchased legitimate tax, estate-planning and family-office services that allegedly saved him between $1 billion and $2 billion. He said Epstein deceived him about the deductibility of his fees, exaggerated his influence and repeatedly demanded more money, eventually causing Black to end their relationship in 2018. Black denied knowing about Epstein’s trafficking operation, abusing any woman, having sex with anyone underage, paying Epstein for access to women or being blackmailed by him. At the same time, he acknowledged spending considerable time around Epstein, meeting prominent figures through him and contributing a birthday poem describing Epstein’s interest in attractive women around the world. Although Black later insisted Epstein was not a “dear friend,” the birthday message itself called him exactly that and was signed “love and kisses.”<br /><br />The questioning became confrontational when committee investigators turned to Black’s relationships with women and nondisclosure agreements. Black acknowledged a six-year extramarital affair and confirmed a settlement that included monthly payments, loan forgiveness and money connected to a British visa, while saying he regarded the woman’s demands as blackmail and had discussed the situation with Epstein. He and his attorneys then refused to disclose how many NDAs he had signed, their terms or who else in his social circle had such agreements, arguing that confidentiality provisions prevented him from answering during a voluntary interview. Committee officials rejected that position and served Black with subpoenas for relevant documents and a later deposition. His lawyers denounced the move as a political stunt and abruptly ended the interview before lawmakers could fully question him about the $158 million in payments or the broader allegations surrounding his association with Epstein.<br /><br /><br />To contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73075897</guid><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73075897/blacktranscript3.mp3" length="15460772" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3dc23b80-7375-4718-84ce-7a32cf6b048e/3dc23b80-7375-4718-84ce-7a32cf6b048e.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3dc23b80-7375-4718-84ce-7a32cf6b048e/3dc23b80-7375-4718-84ce-7a32cf6b048e.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3dc23b80-7375-4718-84ce-7a32cf6b048e/3dc23b80-7375-4718-84ce-7a32cf6b048e.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Leon Black used his appearance before the House Oversight Committee to defend his long-running relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and explain the extraordinary $158 million he paid him between 2013 and 2017. Black maintained that the money purchased...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Leon Black used his appearance before the House Oversight Committee to defend his long-running relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and explain the extraordinary $158 million he paid him between 2013 and 2017. Black maintained that the money purchased legitimate tax, estate-planning and family-office services that allegedly saved him between $1 billion and $2 billion. He said Epstein deceived him about the deductibility of his fees, exaggerated his influence and repeatedly demanded more money, eventually causing Black to end their relationship in 2018. Black denied knowing about Epstein’s trafficking operation, abusing any woman, having sex with anyone underage, paying Epstein for access to women or being blackmailed by him. At the same time, he acknowledged spending considerable time around Epstein, meeting prominent figures through him and contributing a birthday poem describing Epstein’s interest in attractive women around the world. Although Black later insisted Epstein was not a “dear friend,” the birthday message itself called him exactly that and was signed “love and kisses.”<br /><br />The questioning became confrontational when committee investigators turned to Black’s relationships with women and nondisclosure agreements. Black acknowledged a six-year extramarital affair and confirmed a settlement that included monthly payments, loan forgiveness and money connected to a British visa, while saying he regarded the woman’s demands as blackmail and had discussed the situation with Epstein. He and his attorneys then refused to disclose how many NDAs he had signed, their terms or who else in his social circle had such agreements, arguing that confidentiality provisions prevented him from answering during a voluntary interview. Committee officials rejected that position and served Black with subpoenas for relevant documents and a later deposition. His lawyers denounced the move as a political stunt and abruptly ended the interview before lawmakers could fully question him about the $158 million in payments or the broader allegations surrounding his association with Epstein.<br /><br /><br />To contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>967</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Ghislaine Maxwell And Her Shameless Attempt To Change History (7/22/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-ghislaine-maxwell-and-her-shameless-attempt-to-change-history-7-22-26--73089624</link><description><![CDATA[Ghislaine Maxwell repeatedly attempted to portray herself as another casualty of Jeffrey Epstein, emphasizing his alleged manipulation, control and betrayal while highlighting the humiliation, isolation and punishment she had endured since her arrest. At sentencing, she shifted attention toward Epstein’s character and suggested that association with him had become the greatest mistake of her life, but she stopped short of accepting full responsibility for recruiting, grooming and facilitating the abuse of underage girls. Her presentation cast her as someone who had been misled by a powerful man rather than as an active participant who helped create the conditions in which Epstein could repeatedly exploit vulnerable victims. Prosecutors, however, described Maxwell as instrumental to the abuse and emphasized that she had played a central role in identifying, grooming and abusing victims while enjoying the wealth and privilege that came with her relationship with Epstein.<br /><br />At the same time, Maxwell minimized the suffering of the actual survivors by offering an expression of sympathy that many viewed as evasive rather than a genuine apology. She did not directly acknowledge the specific acts for which she had been convicted, confront the lifelong damage described in the victims’ statements or admit that she had used trust, attention and promises of opportunity to help deliver young girls into Epstein’s orbit. Instead, her remarks redirected blame toward Epstein and centered her own losses, allowing her to appear remorseful without fully recognizing the agency she exercised or the devastation she caused. For survivors who described years of trauma, shame, fear and damaged relationships, Maxwell’s effort to claim victimhood was especially offensive because it placed her discomfort beside suffering that she had actively helped inflict.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonnmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73089624</guid><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73089624/megamaxwellpaintedasvictimshamesrealvictims.mp3" length="51890094" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ecc6b596-123e-4773-98be-36cfcdcdd3ca/ecc6b596-123e-4773-98be-36cfcdcdd3ca.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ecc6b596-123e-4773-98be-36cfcdcdd3ca/ecc6b596-123e-4773-98be-36cfcdcdd3ca.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ecc6b596-123e-4773-98be-36cfcdcdd3ca/ecc6b596-123e-4773-98be-36cfcdcdd3ca.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Ghislaine Maxwell repeatedly attempted to portray herself as another casualty of Jeffrey Epstein, emphasizing his alleged manipulation, control and betrayal while highlighting the humiliation, isolation and punishment she had endured since her arrest....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Ghislaine Maxwell repeatedly attempted to portray herself as another casualty of Jeffrey Epstein, emphasizing his alleged manipulation, control and betrayal while highlighting the humiliation, isolation and punishment she had endured since her arrest. At sentencing, she shifted attention toward Epstein’s character and suggested that association with him had become the greatest mistake of her life, but she stopped short of accepting full responsibility for recruiting, grooming and facilitating the abuse of underage girls. Her presentation cast her as someone who had been misled by a powerful man rather than as an active participant who helped create the conditions in which Epstein could repeatedly exploit vulnerable victims. Prosecutors, however, described Maxwell as instrumental to the abuse and emphasized that she had played a central role in identifying, grooming and abusing victims while enjoying the wealth and privilege that came with her relationship with Epstein.<br /><br />At the same time, Maxwell minimized the suffering of the actual survivors by offering an expression of sympathy that many viewed as evasive rather than a genuine apology. She did not directly acknowledge the specific acts for which she had been convicted, confront the lifelong damage described in the victims’ statements or admit that she had used trust, attention and promises of opportunity to help deliver young girls into Epstein’s orbit. Instead, her remarks redirected blame toward Epstein and centered her own losses, allowing her to appear remorseful without fully recognizing the agency she exercised or the devastation she caused. For survivors who described years of trauma, shame, fear and damaged relationships, Maxwell’s effort to claim victimhood was especially offensive because it placed her discomfort beside suffering that she had actively helped inflict.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonnmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3244</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   Leon Black's Narrative Versus The Record (7/22/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-leon-black-s-narrative-versus-the-record-7-22-26--73089453</link><description><![CDATA[Leon Black has tried to portray his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein as primarily professional, limited to sophisticated tax and estate-planning work, while insisting that he knew nothing about Epstein’s criminal activities and eventually realized Epstein had deceived and overcharged him. The record, however, points to a relationship that was far more extensive and personal than that description suggests. Black paid Epstein approximately $158 million between 2012 and 2017, years after Epstein had pleaded guilty to soliciting a minor, and also directed a $10 million donation to an Epstein-linked charity. Black continued consulting Epstein on personal matters, including disputes involving women, while documents show Epstein acting as an intermediary in sensitive situations. Black’s claim that Epstein was not truly a close friend is also difficult to reconcile with his contribution to Epstein’s 2003 birthday album, where he referred to him as a “dear friend,” joked about Epstein’s interest in women and signed the message “love and kisses.”<br /><br />The inconsistencies became even more pronounced during Black’s congressional questioning. While presenting himself as fully cooperative and eager to clear the record, he and his attorneys refused to answer questions about nondisclosure agreements, settlements and the number of women with whom he had entered confidential arrangements. That resistance prompted lawmakers to issue subpoenas for documents and additional sworn testimony. Black has denied all allegations of sexual misconduct and no criminal charges have been brought against him in connection with Epstein, but his carefully narrowed account does not comfortably match the scale of the payments, the duration of the association, the personal communications or his continued reliance on Epstein after the financier’s conviction. The central problem with Black’s narrative is not simply that he associated with Epstein; it is that he repeatedly minimizes a relationship that the documentary record portrays as financially enormous, socially familiar and deeply intertwined with his private affairs.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73089453</guid><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 08:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73089453/megaleonblackversustherecord.mp3" length="43997801" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a6481922-3a83-4f5d-851e-05576910ede3/a6481922-3a83-4f5d-851e-05576910ede3.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a6481922-3a83-4f5d-851e-05576910ede3/a6481922-3a83-4f5d-851e-05576910ede3.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a6481922-3a83-4f5d-851e-05576910ede3/a6481922-3a83-4f5d-851e-05576910ede3.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Leon Black has tried to portray his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein as primarily professional, limited to sophisticated tax and estate-planning work, while insisting that he knew nothing about Epstein’s criminal activities and eventually realized...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Leon Black has tried to portray his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein as primarily professional, limited to sophisticated tax and estate-planning work, while insisting that he knew nothing about Epstein’s criminal activities and eventually realized Epstein had deceived and overcharged him. The record, however, points to a relationship that was far more extensive and personal than that description suggests. Black paid Epstein approximately $158 million between 2012 and 2017, years after Epstein had pleaded guilty to soliciting a minor, and also directed a $10 million donation to an Epstein-linked charity. Black continued consulting Epstein on personal matters, including disputes involving women, while documents show Epstein acting as an intermediary in sensitive situations. Black’s claim that Epstein was not truly a close friend is also difficult to reconcile with his contribution to Epstein’s 2003 birthday album, where he referred to him as a “dear friend,” joked about Epstein’s interest in women and signed the message “love and kisses.”<br /><br />The inconsistencies became even more pronounced during Black’s congressional questioning. While presenting himself as fully cooperative and eager to clear the record, he and his attorneys refused to answer questions about nondisclosure agreements, settlements and the number of women with whom he had entered confidential arrangements. That resistance prompted lawmakers to issue subpoenas for documents and additional sworn testimony. Black has denied all allegations of sexual misconduct and no criminal charges have been brought against him in connection with Epstein, but his carefully narrowed account does not comfortably match the scale of the payments, the duration of the association, the personal communications or his continued reliance on Epstein after the financier’s conviction. The central problem with Black’s narrative is not simply that he associated with Epstein; it is that he repeatedly minimizes a relationship that the documentary record portrays as financially enormous, socially familiar and deeply intertwined with his private affairs.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2750</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The FBI And Their Epstein Related Accountability Problem (7/21/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-fbi-and-their-epstein-related-accountability-problem-7-21-26--73089452</link><description><![CDATA[<br />The FBI’s Epstein-related accountability problem stretches back to at least 1996, when Maria Farmer reported allegations involving Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and the exploitation of underage girls. The complaint was documented, yet no prosecution followed, and Epstein was allowed to continue operating for years before Palm Beach police opened a new investigation in 2005. Even after the FBI developed a federal case involving numerous alleged victims, the matter was resolved through a secret non-prosecution agreement that spared Epstein from federal charges, protected potential co-conspirators and kept survivors uninformed. Epstein instead pleaded guilty to lesser state offenses and served only 13 months under unusually permissive conditions. A later Justice Department review criticized the handling of the case but largely avoided findings of professional misconduct, reinforcing the impression that institutional failure was acknowledged without anyone being meaningfully held responsible.<br /><br />The same pattern continued after Epstein’s 2019 arrest, when the FBI and Justice Department possessed enormous quantities of evidence but produced remarkably little additional accountability beyond the prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell. Epstein died before trial amid catastrophic failures at the federal jail holding him, while questions remained about his associates, recruiters, financial network and the evidence accumulated during decades of investigations. Subsequent document releases revealed how much information had been collected, yet survivors and the public were still left asking why earlier warnings were ignored, why obvious investigative avenues appeared to stall and why so few people faced charges. The FBI has repeatedly positioned itself as ready to receive new information, but critics argue that the central problem is not a lack of tips; it is the bureau’s failure to explain what it did with the evidence it already had. After three decades, there has still been no comprehensive public accounting of who made the crucial decisions, why the investigations repeatedly stopped short and whether anyone inside the institution suffered consequences for allowing Epstein’s operation to continue.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73089452</guid><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73089452/megafbiepsteinaccountabilityproblem.mp3" length="52606894" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/eb3969ea-3d55-4738-b67c-c3155b927276/eb3969ea-3d55-4738-b67c-c3155b927276.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/eb3969ea-3d55-4738-b67c-c3155b927276/eb3969ea-3d55-4738-b67c-c3155b927276.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/eb3969ea-3d55-4738-b67c-c3155b927276/eb3969ea-3d55-4738-b67c-c3155b927276.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The FBI’s Epstein-related accountability problem stretches back to at least 1996, when Maria Farmer reported allegations involving Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and the exploitation of underage girls. The complaint was documented, yet no...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br />The FBI’s Epstein-related accountability problem stretches back to at least 1996, when Maria Farmer reported allegations involving Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and the exploitation of underage girls. The complaint was documented, yet no prosecution followed, and Epstein was allowed to continue operating for years before Palm Beach police opened a new investigation in 2005. Even after the FBI developed a federal case involving numerous alleged victims, the matter was resolved through a secret non-prosecution agreement that spared Epstein from federal charges, protected potential co-conspirators and kept survivors uninformed. Epstein instead pleaded guilty to lesser state offenses and served only 13 months under unusually permissive conditions. A later Justice Department review criticized the handling of the case but largely avoided findings of professional misconduct, reinforcing the impression that institutional failure was acknowledged without anyone being meaningfully held responsible.<br /><br />The same pattern continued after Epstein’s 2019 arrest, when the FBI and Justice Department possessed enormous quantities of evidence but produced remarkably little additional accountability beyond the prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell. Epstein died before trial amid catastrophic failures at the federal jail holding him, while questions remained about his associates, recruiters, financial network and the evidence accumulated during decades of investigations. Subsequent document releases revealed how much information had been collected, yet survivors and the public were still left asking why earlier warnings were ignored, why obvious investigative avenues appeared to stall and why so few people faced charges. The FBI has repeatedly positioned itself as ready to receive new information, but critics argue that the central problem is not a lack of tips; it is the bureau’s failure to explain what it did with the evidence it already had. After three decades, there has still been no comprehensive public accounting of who made the crucial decisions, why the investigations repeatedly stopped short and whether anyone inside the institution suffered consequences for allowing Epstein’s operation to continue.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3288</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s Deposition in Edwards and Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz (Part 8)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/virginia-roberts-giuffre-s-deposition-in-edwards-and-cassell-v-alan-dershowitz-part-8--73068650</link><description><![CDATA[The videotaped deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre taken on January 16, 2016, in Fort Lauderdale sits at the center of the bitter legal war between Epstein survivors’ attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell and Alan Dershowitz, who was accused by Giuffre of sexually abusing her when she was a minor trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein. In the deposition, Giuffre gives a detailed, sworn narrative of how she was recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell, groomed, trafficked to powerful men, and moved across multiple jurisdictions while still underage. She identifies Epstein’s residences, flight patterns, intermediaries, and specific encounters, placing her allegations firmly inside the broader trafficking structure rather than as isolated claims. The testimony was preserved on video precisely because her lawyers anticipated that credibility, consistency, and demeanor would become central issues in the defamation battle that followed. It also captured Giuffre under oath before years of public pressure, media narratives, and evolving legal strategies could reshape the record.<br /><br />What made this deposition legally explosive was its direct role in the defamation and civil litigation between Dershowitz and the Edwards–Cassell team, after Giuffre publicly accused Dershowitz and he responded with an aggressive campaign claiming she had fabricated the allegations and falsely implicated him. The video became a critical piece of evidence in determining whether Giuffre’s statements were knowingly false or grounded in a consistent trafficking account supported by contemporaneous detail. Dershowitz’s lawyers later argued that contradictions, memory gaps, and timeline disputes undermined her credibility, while Giuffre’s side pointed to the overall coherence of her narrative and the corroborating travel and contact records emerging in parallel cases. Long before the unsealing battles and public reckonings, this deposition quietly locked in one of the earliest comprehensive sworn accounts of Epstein’s trafficking network—and the legal fault line that would later fracture the reputations of some of the most powerful lawyers and institutions tied to the case.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Giuffre%20v.%20Maxwell,%20No.%20115-cv-07433%20(S.D.N.Y.%202015)/1257-12.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1257-12.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73068650</guid><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73068650/virginiadershdeposition8_1.mp3" length="12098290" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/841411b6-6871-4b3c-80c8-2b4745824b12/841411b6-6871-4b3c-80c8-2b4745824b12.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/841411b6-6871-4b3c-80c8-2b4745824b12/841411b6-6871-4b3c-80c8-2b4745824b12.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/841411b6-6871-4b3c-80c8-2b4745824b12/841411b6-6871-4b3c-80c8-2b4745824b12.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The videotaped deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre taken on January 16, 2016, in Fort Lauderdale sits at the center of the bitter legal war between Epstein survivors’ attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell and Alan Dershowitz, who was accused...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The videotaped deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre taken on January 16, 2016, in Fort Lauderdale sits at the center of the bitter legal war between Epstein survivors’ attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell and Alan Dershowitz, who was accused by Giuffre of sexually abusing her when she was a minor trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein. In the deposition, Giuffre gives a detailed, sworn narrative of how she was recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell, groomed, trafficked to powerful men, and moved across multiple jurisdictions while still underage. She identifies Epstein’s residences, flight patterns, intermediaries, and specific encounters, placing her allegations firmly inside the broader trafficking structure rather than as isolated claims. The testimony was preserved on video precisely because her lawyers anticipated that credibility, consistency, and demeanor would become central issues in the defamation battle that followed. It also captured Giuffre under oath before years of public pressure, media narratives, and evolving legal strategies could reshape the record.<br /><br />What made this deposition legally explosive was its direct role in the defamation and civil litigation between Dershowitz and the Edwards–Cassell team, after Giuffre publicly accused Dershowitz and he responded with an aggressive campaign claiming she had fabricated the allegations and falsely implicated him. The video became a critical piece of evidence in determining whether Giuffre’s statements were knowingly false or grounded in a consistent trafficking account supported by contemporaneous detail. Dershowitz’s lawyers later argued that contradictions, memory gaps, and timeline disputes undermined her credibility, while Giuffre’s side pointed to the overall coherence of her narrative and the corroborating travel and contact records emerging in parallel cases. Long before the unsealing battles and public reckonings, this deposition quietly locked in one of the earliest comprehensive sworn accounts of Epstein’s trafficking network—and the legal fault line that would later fracture the reputations of some of the most powerful lawyers and institutions tied to the case.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Giuffre%20v.%20Maxwell,%20No.%20115-cv-07433%20(S.D.N.Y.%202015)/1257-12.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1257-12.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>757</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s Deposition in Edwards and Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz (Part 7)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/virginia-roberts-giuffre-s-deposition-in-edwards-and-cassell-v-alan-dershowitz-part-7--73068646</link><description><![CDATA[The videotaped deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre taken on January 16, 2016, in Fort Lauderdale sits at the center of the bitter legal war between Epstein survivors’ attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell and Alan Dershowitz, who was accused by Giuffre of sexually abusing her when she was a minor trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein. In the deposition, Giuffre gives a detailed, sworn narrative of how she was recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell, groomed, trafficked to powerful men, and moved across multiple jurisdictions while still underage. She identifies Epstein’s residences, flight patterns, intermediaries, and specific encounters, placing her allegations firmly inside the broader trafficking structure rather than as isolated claims. The testimony was preserved on video precisely because her lawyers anticipated that credibility, consistency, and demeanor would become central issues in the defamation battle that followed. It also captured Giuffre under oath before years of public pressure, media narratives, and evolving legal strategies could reshape the record.<br /><br />What made this deposition legally explosive was its direct role in the defamation and civil litigation between Dershowitz and the Edwards–Cassell team, after Giuffre publicly accused Dershowitz and he responded with an aggressive campaign claiming she had fabricated the allegations and falsely implicated him. The video became a critical piece of evidence in determining whether Giuffre’s statements were knowingly false or grounded in a consistent trafficking account supported by contemporaneous detail. Dershowitz’s lawyers later argued that contradictions, memory gaps, and timeline disputes undermined her credibility, while Giuffre’s side pointed to the overall coherence of her narrative and the corroborating travel and contact records emerging in parallel cases. Long before the unsealing battles and public reckonings, this deposition quietly locked in one of the earliest comprehensive sworn accounts of Epstein’s trafficking network—and the legal fault line that would later fracture the reputations of some of the most powerful lawyers and institutions tied to the case.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Giuffre%20v.%20Maxwell,%20No.%20115-cv-07433%20(S.D.N.Y.%202015)/1257-12.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1257-12.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73068646</guid><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73068646/virginiadershdeposition7_1.mp3" length="12308942" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1fe99f01-e3a2-4c98-8463-0ea37b6dd7eb/1fe99f01-e3a2-4c98-8463-0ea37b6dd7eb.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1fe99f01-e3a2-4c98-8463-0ea37b6dd7eb/1fe99f01-e3a2-4c98-8463-0ea37b6dd7eb.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1fe99f01-e3a2-4c98-8463-0ea37b6dd7eb/1fe99f01-e3a2-4c98-8463-0ea37b6dd7eb.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The videotaped deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre taken on January 16, 2016, in Fort Lauderdale sits at the center of the bitter legal war between Epstein survivors’ attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell and Alan Dershowitz, who was accused...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The videotaped deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre taken on January 16, 2016, in Fort Lauderdale sits at the center of the bitter legal war between Epstein survivors’ attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell and Alan Dershowitz, who was accused by Giuffre of sexually abusing her when she was a minor trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein. In the deposition, Giuffre gives a detailed, sworn narrative of how she was recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell, groomed, trafficked to powerful men, and moved across multiple jurisdictions while still underage. She identifies Epstein’s residences, flight patterns, intermediaries, and specific encounters, placing her allegations firmly inside the broader trafficking structure rather than as isolated claims. The testimony was preserved on video precisely because her lawyers anticipated that credibility, consistency, and demeanor would become central issues in the defamation battle that followed. It also captured Giuffre under oath before years of public pressure, media narratives, and evolving legal strategies could reshape the record.<br /><br />What made this deposition legally explosive was its direct role in the defamation and civil litigation between Dershowitz and the Edwards–Cassell team, after Giuffre publicly accused Dershowitz and he responded with an aggressive campaign claiming she had fabricated the allegations and falsely implicated him. The video became a critical piece of evidence in determining whether Giuffre’s statements were knowingly false or grounded in a consistent trafficking account supported by contemporaneous detail. Dershowitz’s lawyers later argued that contradictions, memory gaps, and timeline disputes undermined her credibility, while Giuffre’s side pointed to the overall coherence of her narrative and the corroborating travel and contact records emerging in parallel cases. Long before the unsealing battles and public reckonings, this deposition quietly locked in one of the earliest comprehensive sworn accounts of Epstein’s trafficking network—and the legal fault line that would later fracture the reputations of some of the most powerful lawyers and institutions tied to the case.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Giuffre%20v.%20Maxwell,%20No.%20115-cv-07433%20(S.D.N.Y.%202015)/1257-12.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1257-12.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>770</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s Deposition in Edwards and Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz (Part 6)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/virginia-roberts-giuffre-s-deposition-in-edwards-and-cassell-v-alan-dershowitz-part-6--73068643</link><description><![CDATA[The videotaped deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre taken on January 16, 2016, in Fort Lauderdale sits at the center of the bitter legal war between Epstein survivors’ attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell and Alan Dershowitz, who was accused by Giuffre of sexually abusing her when she was a minor trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein. In the deposition, Giuffre gives a detailed, sworn narrative of how she was recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell, groomed, trafficked to powerful men, and moved across multiple jurisdictions while still underage. She identifies Epstein’s residences, flight patterns, intermediaries, and specific encounters, placing her allegations firmly inside the broader trafficking structure rather than as isolated claims. The testimony was preserved on video precisely because her lawyers anticipated that credibility, consistency, and demeanor would become central issues in the defamation battle that followed. It also captured Giuffre under oath before years of public pressure, media narratives, and evolving legal strategies could reshape the record.<br /><br />What made this deposition legally explosive was its direct role in the defamation and civil litigation between Dershowitz and the Edwards–Cassell team, after Giuffre publicly accused Dershowitz and he responded with an aggressive campaign claiming she had fabricated the allegations and falsely implicated him. The video became a critical piece of evidence in determining whether Giuffre’s statements were knowingly false or grounded in a consistent trafficking account supported by contemporaneous detail. Dershowitz’s lawyers later argued that contradictions, memory gaps, and timeline disputes undermined her credibility, while Giuffre’s side pointed to the overall coherence of her narrative and the corroborating travel and contact records emerging in parallel cases. Long before the unsealing battles and public reckonings, this deposition quietly locked in one of the earliest comprehensive sworn accounts of Epstein’s trafficking network—and the legal fault line that would later fracture the reputations of some of the most powerful lawyers and institutions tied to the case.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Giuffre%20v.%20Maxwell,%20No.%20115-cv-07433%20(S.D.N.Y.%202015)/1257-12.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1257-12.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73068643</guid><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 00:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73068643/virginiadershdeposition6_1.mp3" length="13658114" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/86970f09-3a48-4d17-8c2e-a16611945aad/86970f09-3a48-4d17-8c2e-a16611945aad.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/86970f09-3a48-4d17-8c2e-a16611945aad/86970f09-3a48-4d17-8c2e-a16611945aad.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/86970f09-3a48-4d17-8c2e-a16611945aad/86970f09-3a48-4d17-8c2e-a16611945aad.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The videotaped deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre taken on January 16, 2016, in Fort Lauderdale sits at the center of the bitter legal war between Epstein survivors’ attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell and Alan Dershowitz, who was accused...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The videotaped deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre taken on January 16, 2016, in Fort Lauderdale sits at the center of the bitter legal war between Epstein survivors’ attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell and Alan Dershowitz, who was accused by Giuffre of sexually abusing her when she was a minor trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein. In the deposition, Giuffre gives a detailed, sworn narrative of how she was recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell, groomed, trafficked to powerful men, and moved across multiple jurisdictions while still underage. She identifies Epstein’s residences, flight patterns, intermediaries, and specific encounters, placing her allegations firmly inside the broader trafficking structure rather than as isolated claims. The testimony was preserved on video precisely because her lawyers anticipated that credibility, consistency, and demeanor would become central issues in the defamation battle that followed. It also captured Giuffre under oath before years of public pressure, media narratives, and evolving legal strategies could reshape the record.<br /><br />What made this deposition legally explosive was its direct role in the defamation and civil litigation between Dershowitz and the Edwards–Cassell team, after Giuffre publicly accused Dershowitz and he responded with an aggressive campaign claiming she had fabricated the allegations and falsely implicated him. The video became a critical piece of evidence in determining whether Giuffre’s statements were knowingly false or grounded in a consistent trafficking account supported by contemporaneous detail. Dershowitz’s lawyers later argued that contradictions, memory gaps, and timeline disputes undermined her credibility, while Giuffre’s side pointed to the overall coherence of her narrative and the corroborating travel and contact records emerging in parallel cases. Long before the unsealing battles and public reckonings, this deposition quietly locked in one of the earliest comprehensive sworn accounts of Epstein’s trafficking network—and the legal fault line that would later fracture the reputations of some of the most powerful lawyers and institutions tied to the case.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Giuffre%20v.%20Maxwell,%20No.%20115-cv-07433%20(S.D.N.Y.%202015)/1257-12.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1257-12.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>854</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s Deposition in Edwards and Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz (Part 5)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/virginia-roberts-giuffre-s-deposition-in-edwards-and-cassell-v-alan-dershowitz-part-5--73068647</link><description><![CDATA[The videotaped deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre taken on January 16, 2016, in Fort Lauderdale sits at the center of the bitter legal war between Epstein survivors’ attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell and Alan Dershowitz, who was accused by Giuffre of sexually abusing her when she was a minor trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein. In the deposition, Giuffre gives a detailed, sworn narrative of how she was recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell, groomed, trafficked to powerful men, and moved across multiple jurisdictions while still underage. She identifies Epstein’s residences, flight patterns, intermediaries, and specific encounters, placing her allegations firmly inside the broader trafficking structure rather than as isolated claims. The testimony was preserved on video precisely because her lawyers anticipated that credibility, consistency, and demeanor would become central issues in the defamation battle that followed. It also captured Giuffre under oath before years of public pressure, media narratives, and evolving legal strategies could reshape the record.<br /><br />What made this deposition legally explosive was its direct role in the defamation and civil litigation between Dershowitz and the Edwards–Cassell team, after Giuffre publicly accused Dershowitz and he responded with an aggressive campaign claiming she had fabricated the allegations and falsely implicated him. The video became a critical piece of evidence in determining whether Giuffre’s statements were knowingly false or grounded in a consistent trafficking account supported by contemporaneous detail. Dershowitz’s lawyers later argued that contradictions, memory gaps, and timeline disputes undermined her credibility, while Giuffre’s side pointed to the overall coherence of her narrative and the corroborating travel and contact records emerging in parallel cases. Long before the unsealing battles and public reckonings, this deposition quietly locked in one of the earliest comprehensive sworn accounts of Epstein’s trafficking network—and the legal fault line that would later fracture the reputations of some of the most powerful lawyers and institutions tied to the case.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Giuffre%20v.%20Maxwell,%20No.%20115-cv-07433%20(S.D.N.Y.%202015)/1257-12.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1257-12.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73068647</guid><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73068647/virginiadershdeposition5_1.mp3" length="14458506" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ce80c2ab-71b7-4024-80e4-9f5237e00c12/ce80c2ab-71b7-4024-80e4-9f5237e00c12.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ce80c2ab-71b7-4024-80e4-9f5237e00c12/ce80c2ab-71b7-4024-80e4-9f5237e00c12.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ce80c2ab-71b7-4024-80e4-9f5237e00c12/ce80c2ab-71b7-4024-80e4-9f5237e00c12.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The videotaped deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre taken on January 16, 2016, in Fort Lauderdale sits at the center of the bitter legal war between Epstein survivors’ attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell and Alan Dershowitz, who was accused...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The videotaped deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre taken on January 16, 2016, in Fort Lauderdale sits at the center of the bitter legal war between Epstein survivors’ attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell and Alan Dershowitz, who was accused by Giuffre of sexually abusing her when she was a minor trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein. In the deposition, Giuffre gives a detailed, sworn narrative of how she was recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell, groomed, trafficked to powerful men, and moved across multiple jurisdictions while still underage. She identifies Epstein’s residences, flight patterns, intermediaries, and specific encounters, placing her allegations firmly inside the broader trafficking structure rather than as isolated claims. The testimony was preserved on video precisely because her lawyers anticipated that credibility, consistency, and demeanor would become central issues in the defamation battle that followed. It also captured Giuffre under oath before years of public pressure, media narratives, and evolving legal strategies could reshape the record.<br /><br />What made this deposition legally explosive was its direct role in the defamation and civil litigation between Dershowitz and the Edwards–Cassell team, after Giuffre publicly accused Dershowitz and he responded with an aggressive campaign claiming she had fabricated the allegations and falsely implicated him. The video became a critical piece of evidence in determining whether Giuffre’s statements were knowingly false or grounded in a consistent trafficking account supported by contemporaneous detail. Dershowitz’s lawyers later argued that contradictions, memory gaps, and timeline disputes undermined her credibility, while Giuffre’s side pointed to the overall coherence of her narrative and the corroborating travel and contact records emerging in parallel cases. Long before the unsealing battles and public reckonings, this deposition quietly locked in one of the earliest comprehensive sworn accounts of Epstein’s trafficking network—and the legal fault line that would later fracture the reputations of some of the most powerful lawyers and institutions tied to the case.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Giuffre%20v.%20Maxwell,%20No.%20115-cv-07433%20(S.D.N.Y.%202015)/1257-12.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1257-12.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>904</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Family Wealth, Public Defenders and the Cost of the Tyler Robinson Trial (7/21/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/family-wealth-public-defenders-and-the-cost-of-the-tyler-robinson-trial-7-21-26--73075974</link><description><![CDATA[Tyler Robinson’s father, Matthew Robinson, has continued operating the family’s successful stone and marble business in St. George, Utah, while his son awaits trial for the alleged murder of Charlie Kirk. The company reportedly relies on word-of-mouth advertising and longstanding relationships with local contractors, many of whom have continued doing business with the family despite the criminal case. Court records show that Matthew previously faced a lawsuit from his brother and former business partner, Clint Robinson, who accused him of misappropriating roughly $100,000, concealing financial records and exchanging company work for personal favors. The brothers eventually resolved the dispute through a confidential settlement, and Matthew has declined to publicly discuss either the old allegations or his son’s case.<br /><br />Although Robinson comes from a family that appears financially comfortable, a judge declared the 23-year-old indigent, meaning Utah taxpayers are funding his capital-murder defense. His attorneys have reportedly requested an additional $2 million for experts and trial preparation, while legal analysts estimate the total cost could eventually exceed $10 million once a lengthy trial and possible appeals are included. Prosecutors presented testimony at the preliminary hearing alleging that Robinson confessed several times to his partner, Lance Twiggs, before surrendering with the assistance of his father and a family friend who had worked in law enforcement. The case has also placed intense scrutiny on Robinson’s hometown, where former teachers and residents have expressed shock over the allegations and frustration with the continuing national attention.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73075974</guid><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73075974/tylerrobinsondadsbusiness.mp3" length="13289892" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9a70bceb-f371-42ce-9b50-3323a57f2587/9a70bceb-f371-42ce-9b50-3323a57f2587.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9a70bceb-f371-42ce-9b50-3323a57f2587/9a70bceb-f371-42ce-9b50-3323a57f2587.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9a70bceb-f371-42ce-9b50-3323a57f2587/9a70bceb-f371-42ce-9b50-3323a57f2587.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Tyler Robinson’s father, Matthew Robinson, has continued operating the family’s successful stone and marble business in St. George, Utah, while his son awaits trial for the alleged murder of Charlie Kirk. The company reportedly relies on word-of-mouth...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Tyler Robinson’s father, Matthew Robinson, has continued operating the family’s successful stone and marble business in St. George, Utah, while his son awaits trial for the alleged murder of Charlie Kirk. The company reportedly relies on word-of-mouth advertising and longstanding relationships with local contractors, many of whom have continued doing business with the family despite the criminal case. Court records show that Matthew previously faced a lawsuit from his brother and former business partner, Clint Robinson, who accused him of misappropriating roughly $100,000, concealing financial records and exchanging company work for personal favors. The brothers eventually resolved the dispute through a confidential settlement, and Matthew has declined to publicly discuss either the old allegations or his son’s case.<br /><br />Although Robinson comes from a family that appears financially comfortable, a judge declared the 23-year-old indigent, meaning Utah taxpayers are funding his capital-murder defense. His attorneys have reportedly requested an additional $2 million for experts and trial preparation, while legal analysts estimate the total cost could eventually exceed $10 million once a lengthy trial and possible appeals are included. Prosecutors presented testimony at the preliminary hearing alleging that Robinson confessed several times to his partner, Lance Twiggs, before surrendering with the assistance of his father and a family friend who had worked in law enforcement. The case has also placed intense scrutiny on Robinson’s hometown, where former teachers and residents have expressed shock over the allegations and frustration with the continuing national attention.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>831</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Leon Black And His Epstein Related Congressional Transcript (Part 2) (7/21/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/leon-black-and-his-epstein-related-congressional-transcript-part-2-7-21-26--73075969</link><description><![CDATA[Leon Black used his appearance before the House Oversight Committee to defend his long-running relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and explain the extraordinary $158 million he paid him between 2013 and 2017. Black maintained that the money purchased legitimate tax, estate-planning and family-office services that allegedly saved him between $1 billion and $2 billion. He said Epstein deceived him about the deductibility of his fees, exaggerated his influence and repeatedly demanded more money, eventually causing Black to end their relationship in 2018. Black denied knowing about Epstein’s trafficking operation, abusing any woman, having sex with anyone underage, paying Epstein for access to women or being blackmailed by him. At the same time, he acknowledged spending considerable time around Epstein, meeting prominent figures through him and contributing a birthday poem describing Epstein’s interest in attractive women around the world. Although Black later insisted Epstein was not a “dear friend,” the birthday message itself called him exactly that and was signed “love and kisses.”<br /><br />The questioning became confrontational when committee investigators turned to Black’s relationships with women and nondisclosure agreements. Black acknowledged a six-year extramarital affair and confirmed a settlement that included monthly payments, loan forgiveness and money connected to a British visa, while saying he regarded the woman’s demands as blackmail and had discussed the situation with Epstein. He and his attorneys then refused to disclose how many NDAs he had signed, their terms or who else in his social circle had such agreements, arguing that confidentiality provisions prevented him from answering during a voluntary interview. Committee officials rejected that position and served Black with subpoenas for relevant documents and a later deposition. His lawyers denounced the move as a political stunt and abruptly ended the interview before lawmakers could fully question him about the $158 million in payments or the broader allegations surrounding his association with Epstein.<br /><br /><br />To contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73075969</guid><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 18:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73075969/blacktranscript2.mp3" length="12400893" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a1e767e8-346b-4efa-8b0f-b9dd3af8aee4/a1e767e8-346b-4efa-8b0f-b9dd3af8aee4.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a1e767e8-346b-4efa-8b0f-b9dd3af8aee4/a1e767e8-346b-4efa-8b0f-b9dd3af8aee4.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a1e767e8-346b-4efa-8b0f-b9dd3af8aee4/a1e767e8-346b-4efa-8b0f-b9dd3af8aee4.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Leon Black used his appearance before the House Oversight Committee to defend his long-running relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and explain the extraordinary $158 million he paid him between 2013 and 2017. Black maintained that the money purchased...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Leon Black used his appearance before the House Oversight Committee to defend his long-running relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and explain the extraordinary $158 million he paid him between 2013 and 2017. Black maintained that the money purchased legitimate tax, estate-planning and family-office services that allegedly saved him between $1 billion and $2 billion. He said Epstein deceived him about the deductibility of his fees, exaggerated his influence and repeatedly demanded more money, eventually causing Black to end their relationship in 2018. Black denied knowing about Epstein’s trafficking operation, abusing any woman, having sex with anyone underage, paying Epstein for access to women or being blackmailed by him. At the same time, he acknowledged spending considerable time around Epstein, meeting prominent figures through him and contributing a birthday poem describing Epstein’s interest in attractive women around the world. Although Black later insisted Epstein was not a “dear friend,” the birthday message itself called him exactly that and was signed “love and kisses.”<br /><br />The questioning became confrontational when committee investigators turned to Black’s relationships with women and nondisclosure agreements. Black acknowledged a six-year extramarital affair and confirmed a settlement that included monthly payments, loan forgiveness and money connected to a British visa, while saying he regarded the woman’s demands as blackmail and had discussed the situation with Epstein. He and his attorneys then refused to disclose how many NDAs he had signed, their terms or who else in his social circle had such agreements, arguing that confidentiality provisions prevented him from answering during a voluntary interview. Committee officials rejected that position and served Black with subpoenas for relevant documents and a later deposition. His lawyers denounced the move as a political stunt and abruptly ended the interview before lawmakers could fully question him about the $158 million in payments or the broader allegations surrounding his association with Epstein.<br /><br /><br />To contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>776</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Leon Black And His Epstein Related Congressional Transcript (Part 1) (7/21/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/leon-black-and-his-epstein-related-congressional-transcript-part-1-7-21-26--73075968</link><description><![CDATA[Leon Black used his appearance before the House Oversight Committee to defend his long-running relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and explain the extraordinary $158 million he paid him between 2013 and 2017. Black maintained that the money purchased legitimate tax, estate-planning and family-office services that allegedly saved him between $1 billion and $2 billion. He said Epstein deceived him about the deductibility of his fees, exaggerated his influence and repeatedly demanded more money, eventually causing Black to end their relationship in 2018. Black denied knowing about Epstein’s trafficking operation, abusing any woman, having sex with anyone underage, paying Epstein for access to women or being blackmailed by him. At the same time, he acknowledged spending considerable time around Epstein, meeting prominent figures through him and contributing a birthday poem describing Epstein’s interest in attractive women around the world. Although Black later insisted Epstein was not a “dear friend,” the birthday message itself called him exactly that and was signed “love and kisses.”<br /><br />The questioning became confrontational when committee investigators turned to Black’s relationships with women and nondisclosure agreements. Black acknowledged a six-year extramarital affair and confirmed a settlement that included monthly payments, loan forgiveness and money connected to a British visa, while saying he regarded the woman’s demands as blackmail and had discussed the situation with Epstein. He and his attorneys then refused to disclose how many NDAs he had signed, their terms or who else in his social circle had such agreements, arguing that confidentiality provisions prevented him from answering during a voluntary interview. Committee officials rejected that position and served Black with subpoenas for relevant documents and a later deposition. His lawyers denounced the move as a political stunt and abruptly ended the interview before lawmakers could fully question him about the $158 million in payments or the broader allegations surrounding his association with Epstein.<br /><br /><br />To contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73075968</guid><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73075968/blacktranscipt1.mp3" length="19812563" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a2418067-be23-4d8b-b3f9-8e0f75f5f953/a2418067-be23-4d8b-b3f9-8e0f75f5f953.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a2418067-be23-4d8b-b3f9-8e0f75f5f953/a2418067-be23-4d8b-b3f9-8e0f75f5f953.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a2418067-be23-4d8b-b3f9-8e0f75f5f953/a2418067-be23-4d8b-b3f9-8e0f75f5f953.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Leon Black used his appearance before the House Oversight Committee to defend his long-running relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and explain the extraordinary $158 million he paid him between 2013 and 2017. Black maintained that the money purchased...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Leon Black used his appearance before the House Oversight Committee to defend his long-running relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and explain the extraordinary $158 million he paid him between 2013 and 2017. Black maintained that the money purchased legitimate tax, estate-planning and family-office services that allegedly saved him between $1 billion and $2 billion. He said Epstein deceived him about the deductibility of his fees, exaggerated his influence and repeatedly demanded more money, eventually causing Black to end their relationship in 2018. Black denied knowing about Epstein’s trafficking operation, abusing any woman, having sex with anyone underage, paying Epstein for access to women or being blackmailed by him. At the same time, he acknowledged spending considerable time around Epstein, meeting prominent figures through him and contributing a birthday poem describing Epstein’s interest in attractive women around the world. Although Black later insisted Epstein was not a “dear friend,” the birthday message itself called him exactly that and was signed “love and kisses.”<br /><br />The questioning became confrontational when committee investigators turned to Black’s relationships with women and nondisclosure agreements. Black acknowledged a six-year extramarital affair and confirmed a settlement that included monthly payments, loan forgiveness and money connected to a British visa, while saying he regarded the woman’s demands as blackmail and had discussed the situation with Epstein. He and his attorneys then refused to disclose how many NDAs he had signed, their terms or who else in his social circle had such agreements, arguing that confidentiality provisions prevented him from answering during a voluntary interview. Committee officials rejected that position and served Black with subpoenas for relevant documents and a later deposition. His lawyers denounced the move as a political stunt and abruptly ended the interview before lawmakers could fully question him about the $158 million in payments or the broader allegations surrounding his association with Epstein.<br /><br /><br />To contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1239</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Epstein Survivors Accuse Todd Blanche Of Dismissing Calls For New Investigations (7/21/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/epstein-survivors-accuse-todd-blanche-of-dismissing-calls-for-new-investigations-7-21-26--73075896</link><description><![CDATA[Epstein survivors accused Todd Blanche of effectively shutting the door on additional investigations during a tense meeting at the Justice Department. Although Blanche invited the women to provide the FBI with any new evidence they possessed, he reportedly suggested that the existing record might not provide sufficient grounds for further prosecutions and offered no concrete plan for examining unresolved leads, Epstein’s associates, or properties such as Zorro Ranch. Survivors said Blanche asked few, if any, meaningful questions and appeared more interested in completing a politically necessary meeting than in understanding what investigative avenues remained open.<br /><br />The women described the encounter as dismissive, demoralizing and deeply frustrating, with Annie Farmer characterizing Blanche’s manner as abrasive and condescending. Several survivors said they felt gaslit because they were once again being encouraged to produce more information while the Justice Department simultaneously implied that there was little left to investigate, despite the enormous volume of records and longstanding questions surrounding Epstein’s network. To them, the meeting reinforced the familiar message that institutions would listen politely, praise their courage and then decline to take meaningful action. The Justice Department called the gathering productive, but survivors came away feeling unheard, minimized and used as part of Blanche’s confirmation process rather than treated as essential witnesses in a continuing pursuit of accountability.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/epstein-survivor-criticises-us-attorney-general-nominee-1809565" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein Survivor Accuses Trump's AG Todd Blanche of Dismissing Calls for Further Epstein Investigation | IBTimes UK</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73075896</guid><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73075896/jessmichaelsblanchegaslither.mp3" length="10479534" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5c178e5e-dff9-4d26-be4e-d5649f916d14/5c178e5e-dff9-4d26-be4e-d5649f916d14.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5c178e5e-dff9-4d26-be4e-d5649f916d14/5c178e5e-dff9-4d26-be4e-d5649f916d14.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5c178e5e-dff9-4d26-be4e-d5649f916d14/5c178e5e-dff9-4d26-be4e-d5649f916d14.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Epstein survivors accused Todd Blanche of effectively shutting the door on additional investigations during a tense meeting at the Justice Department. Although Blanche invited the women to provide the FBI with any new evidence they possessed, he...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Epstein survivors accused Todd Blanche of effectively shutting the door on additional investigations during a tense meeting at the Justice Department. Although Blanche invited the women to provide the FBI with any new evidence they possessed, he reportedly suggested that the existing record might not provide sufficient grounds for further prosecutions and offered no concrete plan for examining unresolved leads, Epstein’s associates, or properties such as Zorro Ranch. Survivors said Blanche asked few, if any, meaningful questions and appeared more interested in completing a politically necessary meeting than in understanding what investigative avenues remained open.<br /><br />The women described the encounter as dismissive, demoralizing and deeply frustrating, with Annie Farmer characterizing Blanche’s manner as abrasive and condescending. Several survivors said they felt gaslit because they were once again being encouraged to produce more information while the Justice Department simultaneously implied that there was little left to investigate, despite the enormous volume of records and longstanding questions surrounding Epstein’s network. To them, the meeting reinforced the familiar message that institutions would listen politely, praise their courage and then decline to take meaningful action. The Justice Department called the gathering productive, but survivors came away feeling unheard, minimized and used as part of Blanche’s confirmation process rather than treated as essential witnesses in a continuing pursuit of accountability.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/epstein-survivor-criticises-us-attorney-general-nominee-1809565" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein Survivor Accuses Trump's AG Todd Blanche of Dismissing Calls for Further Epstein Investigation | IBTimes UK</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>655</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Alan Dershowitz Backs Out of Epstein Congressional Interview (7/21/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/alan-dershowitz-backs-out-of-epstein-congressional-interview-7-21-26--73075970</link><description><![CDATA[Alan Dershowitz has spent years presenting himself as a fearless defender of due process, loudly attacking Epstein survivors, journalists, and critics while insisting that he was eager to tell Congress his side of the story. Yet when the opportunity reportedly arrived for a transcribed interview about his role on Jeffrey Epstein’s legal team, the Florida non-prosecution agreement, and his public claims, he backed out. The contrast is especially striking given the energy he devoted to the Martha’s Vineyard pierogi incident, where he confronted a vendor, recorded the dispute, threatened legal action, and returned again to make his point. He seemed ready to wage constitutional war over a denied dumpling, but when congressional investigators wanted answers about Epstein, his appetite for confrontation suddenly disappeared.<br /><br />Dershowitz has never been convicted of participating in Epstein’s sexual crimes, and he denies the allegations against him, but his role in helping Epstein secure the extraordinary Florida deal remains a legitimate subject of scrutiny. That agreement protected Epstein from federal prosecution, extended protection to potential co-conspirators, and was negotiated without properly informing the victims. Dershowitz may call his involvement zealous advocacy, but that does not erase the moral consequences of a process that favored wealth, power, and elite access over survivors. His last-minute withdrawal exposes the hypocrisy of a man who demands scrutiny for everyone else while avoiding it himself, proving once again that he is most courageous when he controls the microphone and far less impressive when someone else controls the questions.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73075970</guid><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73075970/dershowitzcancelscongressappearance.mp3" length="11110653" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0d65e07e-4936-49bf-8646-2063a0250183/0d65e07e-4936-49bf-8646-2063a0250183.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0d65e07e-4936-49bf-8646-2063a0250183/0d65e07e-4936-49bf-8646-2063a0250183.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0d65e07e-4936-49bf-8646-2063a0250183/0d65e07e-4936-49bf-8646-2063a0250183.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Alan Dershowitz has spent years presenting himself as a fearless defender of due process, loudly attacking Epstein survivors, journalists, and critics while insisting that he was eager to tell Congress his side of the story. Yet when the opportunity...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Alan Dershowitz has spent years presenting himself as a fearless defender of due process, loudly attacking Epstein survivors, journalists, and critics while insisting that he was eager to tell Congress his side of the story. Yet when the opportunity reportedly arrived for a transcribed interview about his role on Jeffrey Epstein’s legal team, the Florida non-prosecution agreement, and his public claims, he backed out. The contrast is especially striking given the energy he devoted to the Martha’s Vineyard pierogi incident, where he confronted a vendor, recorded the dispute, threatened legal action, and returned again to make his point. He seemed ready to wage constitutional war over a denied dumpling, but when congressional investigators wanted answers about Epstein, his appetite for confrontation suddenly disappeared.<br /><br />Dershowitz has never been convicted of participating in Epstein’s sexual crimes, and he denies the allegations against him, but his role in helping Epstein secure the extraordinary Florida deal remains a legitimate subject of scrutiny. That agreement protected Epstein from federal prosecution, extended protection to potential co-conspirators, and was negotiated without properly informing the victims. Dershowitz may call his involvement zealous advocacy, but that does not erase the moral consequences of a process that favored wealth, power, and elite access over survivors. His last-minute withdrawal exposes the hypocrisy of a man who demands scrutiny for everyone else while avoiding it himself, proving once again that he is most courageous when he controls the microphone and far less impressive when someone else controls the questions.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>695</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Jes Staley Looks To Wiggle Free Of The Epstein Survivor Lawsuit (7/21/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jes-staley-looks-to-wiggle-free-of-the-epstein-survivor-lawsuit-7-21-26--73070723</link><description><![CDATA[Jes Staley asked a federal court to dismiss JPMorgan Chase’s third-party lawsuit against him, which arose from the class-action case brought by survivors who accused the bank of enabling Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking operation. JPMorgan sought to make Staley personally responsible for any damages it might owe, arguing that he concealed what he knew about Epstein, protected Epstein’s relationship with the bank and committed misconduct that exposed JPMorgan to liability. Staley countered that the bank was attempting to turn him into a scapegoat for institutional decisions made over many years. He argued that JPMorgan’s claims for indemnification and the return of compensation were legally defective, insufficiently supported and dependent upon allegations that had not been proven.<br /><br />Staley’s motion maintained that JPMorgan could not simply transfer its potential liability to a former employee when the survivors’ claims concerned the bank’s own conduct, compliance failures and continued servicing of Epstein. His lawyers argued that the complaint failed to establish that Staley had a contractual or legal duty to reimburse JPMorgan for settlements, judgments or legal expenses connected to the Epstein litigation. JPMorgan responded that Staley had been central to the relationship, had withheld material information and should repay compensation if his alleged conduct caused the bank’s losses. Judge Jed Rakoff rejected Staley’s effort to dismiss the case, allowing JPMorgan’s claims against him to continue before the dispute was eventually resolved as part of the broader Epstein-related litigation.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73070723</guid><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73070723/megastaleydismisssurvivors.mp3" length="50460674" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5dd58792-d7c1-46bc-9acd-1a320dce8a0c/5dd58792-d7c1-46bc-9acd-1a320dce8a0c.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5dd58792-d7c1-46bc-9acd-1a320dce8a0c/5dd58792-d7c1-46bc-9acd-1a320dce8a0c.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5dd58792-d7c1-46bc-9acd-1a320dce8a0c/5dd58792-d7c1-46bc-9acd-1a320dce8a0c.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jes Staley asked a federal court to dismiss JPMorgan Chase’s third-party lawsuit against him, which arose from the class-action case brought by survivors who accused the bank of enabling Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking operation. JPMorgan sought to...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jes Staley asked a federal court to dismiss JPMorgan Chase’s third-party lawsuit against him, which arose from the class-action case brought by survivors who accused the bank of enabling Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking operation. JPMorgan sought to make Staley personally responsible for any damages it might owe, arguing that he concealed what he knew about Epstein, protected Epstein’s relationship with the bank and committed misconduct that exposed JPMorgan to liability. Staley countered that the bank was attempting to turn him into a scapegoat for institutional decisions made over many years. He argued that JPMorgan’s claims for indemnification and the return of compensation were legally defective, insufficiently supported and dependent upon allegations that had not been proven.<br /><br />Staley’s motion maintained that JPMorgan could not simply transfer its potential liability to a former employee when the survivors’ claims concerned the bank’s own conduct, compliance failures and continued servicing of Epstein. His lawyers argued that the complaint failed to establish that Staley had a contractual or legal duty to reimburse JPMorgan for settlements, judgments or legal expenses connected to the Epstein litigation. JPMorgan responded that Staley had been central to the relationship, had withheld material information and should repay compensation if his alleged conduct caused the bank’s losses. Judge Jed Rakoff rejected Staley’s effort to dismiss the case, allowing JPMorgan’s claims against him to continue before the dispute was eventually resolved as part of the broader Epstein-related litigation.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3154</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  How Jeffrey Epstein Utilized The Modeling Industry To Abuse Women And Girls (7/21/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-how-jeffrey-epstein-utilized-the-modeling-industry-to-abuse-women-and-girls-7-21-26--73070712</link><description><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein used the modeling industry as both a recruiting pipeline and a layer of legitimacy, surrounding himself with agents, scouts and young aspiring models who could be brought into his orbit under the promise of castings, introductions, travel or career opportunities. Many of these girls were teenagers, foreign nationals or newcomers with little money, limited support and an intense desire to break into a notoriously competitive business. Epstein exploited that imbalance by presenting himself as a wealthy benefactor with powerful connections, making private meetings, massages and trips appear connected to professional advancement. His relationship with modeling agent Jean-Luc Brunel was especially significant, with accusers alleging that Brunel used the promise of modeling work to introduce young women and girls to Epstein. Epstein also helped finance Brunel’s MC2 modeling agency, further entangling himself with an industry capable of providing a steady supply of vulnerable recruits.<br /><br />The modeling world was particularly useful to Epstein because it normalized young women traveling alone, staying in agency-controlled apartments, attending private appointments and relying heavily on older men who claimed they could make or destroy careers. That environment allowed exploitation to be disguised as networking, mentoring or opportunity, while victims could be pressured into silence by fear of losing work, visas, housing or access to the industry. Epstein did not merely prey upon girls who happened to be models; he appears to have deliberately cultivated modeling contacts because the business placed ambitious and often isolated young women within easy reach of powerful gatekeepers. The result was an ecosystem in which glamour concealed vulnerability, professional promises blurred into sexual coercion and adults who should have protected young recruits instead helped deliver some of them into Epstein’s world.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73070712</guid><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73070712/megaepsteinmodelingpipeline.mp3" length="44601722" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/96f9084e-1683-4a06-9f64-85109650c1fc/96f9084e-1683-4a06-9f64-85109650c1fc.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/96f9084e-1683-4a06-9f64-85109650c1fc/96f9084e-1683-4a06-9f64-85109650c1fc.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/96f9084e-1683-4a06-9f64-85109650c1fc/96f9084e-1683-4a06-9f64-85109650c1fc.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jeffrey Epstein used the modeling industry as both a recruiting pipeline and a layer of legitimacy, surrounding himself with agents, scouts and young aspiring models who could be brought into his orbit under the promise of castings, introductions,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein used the modeling industry as both a recruiting pipeline and a layer of legitimacy, surrounding himself with agents, scouts and young aspiring models who could be brought into his orbit under the promise of castings, introductions, travel or career opportunities. Many of these girls were teenagers, foreign nationals or newcomers with little money, limited support and an intense desire to break into a notoriously competitive business. Epstein exploited that imbalance by presenting himself as a wealthy benefactor with powerful connections, making private meetings, massages and trips appear connected to professional advancement. His relationship with modeling agent Jean-Luc Brunel was especially significant, with accusers alleging that Brunel used the promise of modeling work to introduce young women and girls to Epstein. Epstein also helped finance Brunel’s MC2 modeling agency, further entangling himself with an industry capable of providing a steady supply of vulnerable recruits.<br /><br />The modeling world was particularly useful to Epstein because it normalized young women traveling alone, staying in agency-controlled apartments, attending private appointments and relying heavily on older men who claimed they could make or destroy careers. That environment allowed exploitation to be disguised as networking, mentoring or opportunity, while victims could be pressured into silence by fear of losing work, visas, housing or access to the industry. Epstein did not merely prey upon girls who happened to be models; he appears to have deliberately cultivated modeling contacts because the business placed ambitious and often isolated young women within easy reach of powerful gatekeepers. The result was an ecosystem in which glamour concealed vulnerability, professional promises blurred into sexual coercion and adults who should have protected young recruits instead helped deliver some of them into Epstein’s world.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2788</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   The Names Of Alleged Participants In Epstein's Abuse Have Been Known For Years (7/21/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-names-of-alleged-participants-in-epstein-s-abuse-have-been-known-for-years-7-21-26--73070710</link><description><![CDATA[Virginia Roberts Giuffre named the men she said had abused her or participated in Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell’s trafficking operation long before the Epstein scandal became a worldwide obsession. Years before Epstein’s 2019 arrest, she had already provided names in sworn testimony, legal filings, interviews and communications with investigators, including Prince Andrew and other wealthy, politically connected figures. She described how Epstein and Maxwell allegedly used her as a teenager, moved her between properties and directed her into sexual encounters with powerful men. These allegations were not suddenly invented when the scandal exploded; many had been documented, litigated and publicly reported for years.<br /><br />For a long time, however, Giuffre’s claims were treated as peripheral, inconvenient or too dangerous to pursue aggressively because the people she named possessed money, influence and access to elite institutions. She endured attacks on her credibility while repeatedly telling substantially the same story and demanding that authorities and the public examine the wider network surrounding Epstein. When sealed records were later released and public interest surged, many people reacted as though the names and allegations were new, even though Giuffre had been pointing toward them for years. The real failure was not that survivors had remained silent, but that powerful institutions, journalists and authorities had failed to listen when Virginia Roberts Giuffre was already naming names.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73070710</guid><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73070710/megavirginiasurvivorsnamednames.mp3" length="36353297" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a7a6cf27-deb4-4f80-a53e-203182103d23/a7a6cf27-deb4-4f80-a53e-203182103d23.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a7a6cf27-deb4-4f80-a53e-203182103d23/a7a6cf27-deb4-4f80-a53e-203182103d23.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a7a6cf27-deb4-4f80-a53e-203182103d23/a7a6cf27-deb4-4f80-a53e-203182103d23.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Virginia Roberts Giuffre named the men she said had abused her or participated in Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell’s trafficking operation long before the Epstein scandal became a worldwide obsession. Years before Epstein’s 2019 arrest, she had...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Virginia Roberts Giuffre named the men she said had abused her or participated in Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell’s trafficking operation long before the Epstein scandal became a worldwide obsession. Years before Epstein’s 2019 arrest, she had already provided names in sworn testimony, legal filings, interviews and communications with investigators, including Prince Andrew and other wealthy, politically connected figures. She described how Epstein and Maxwell allegedly used her as a teenager, moved her between properties and directed her into sexual encounters with powerful men. These allegations were not suddenly invented when the scandal exploded; many had been documented, litigated and publicly reported for years.<br /><br />For a long time, however, Giuffre’s claims were treated as peripheral, inconvenient or too dangerous to pursue aggressively because the people she named possessed money, influence and access to elite institutions. She endured attacks on her credibility while repeatedly telling substantially the same story and demanding that authorities and the public examine the wider network surrounding Epstein. When sealed records were later released and public interest surged, many people reacted as though the names and allegations were new, even though Giuffre had been pointing toward them for years. The real failure was not that survivors had remained silent, but that powerful institutions, journalists and authorities had failed to listen when Virginia Roberts Giuffre was already naming names.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2273</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s Deposition in Edwards and Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz (Part 4)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/virginia-roberts-giuffre-s-deposition-in-edwards-and-cassell-v-alan-dershowitz-part-4--73068652</link><description><![CDATA[The videotaped deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre taken on January 16, 2016, in Fort Lauderdale sits at the center of the bitter legal war between Epstein survivors’ attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell and Alan Dershowitz, who was accused by Giuffre of sexually abusing her when she was a minor trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein. In the deposition, Giuffre gives a detailed, sworn narrative of how she was recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell, groomed, trafficked to powerful men, and moved across multiple jurisdictions while still underage. She identifies Epstein’s residences, flight patterns, intermediaries, and specific encounters, placing her allegations firmly inside the broader trafficking structure rather than as isolated claims. The testimony was preserved on video precisely because her lawyers anticipated that credibility, consistency, and demeanor would become central issues in the defamation battle that followed. It also captured Giuffre under oath before years of public pressure, media narratives, and evolving legal strategies could reshape the record.<br /><br />What made this deposition legally explosive was its direct role in the defamation and civil litigation between Dershowitz and the Edwards–Cassell team, after Giuffre publicly accused Dershowitz and he responded with an aggressive campaign claiming she had fabricated the allegations and falsely implicated him. The video became a critical piece of evidence in determining whether Giuffre’s statements were knowingly false or grounded in a consistent trafficking account supported by contemporaneous detail. Dershowitz’s lawyers later argued that contradictions, memory gaps, and timeline disputes undermined her credibility, while Giuffre’s side pointed to the overall coherence of her narrative and the corroborating travel and contact records emerging in parallel cases. Long before the unsealing battles and public reckonings, this deposition quietly locked in one of the earliest comprehensive sworn accounts of Epstein’s trafficking network—and the legal fault line that would later fracture the reputations of some of the most powerful lawyers and institutions tied to the case.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Giuffre%20v.%20Maxwell,%20No.%20115-cv-07433%20(S.D.N.Y.%202015)/1257-12.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1257-12.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73068652</guid><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73068652/virginiadershdeposition4_1.mp3" length="14032605" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e8c4c306-a06b-4f55-acf9-4359fe7258e8/e8c4c306-a06b-4f55-acf9-4359fe7258e8.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e8c4c306-a06b-4f55-acf9-4359fe7258e8/e8c4c306-a06b-4f55-acf9-4359fe7258e8.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e8c4c306-a06b-4f55-acf9-4359fe7258e8/e8c4c306-a06b-4f55-acf9-4359fe7258e8.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The videotaped deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre taken on January 16, 2016, in Fort Lauderdale sits at the center of the bitter legal war between Epstein survivors’ attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell and Alan Dershowitz, who was accused...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The videotaped deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre taken on January 16, 2016, in Fort Lauderdale sits at the center of the bitter legal war between Epstein survivors’ attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell and Alan Dershowitz, who was accused by Giuffre of sexually abusing her when she was a minor trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein. In the deposition, Giuffre gives a detailed, sworn narrative of how she was recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell, groomed, trafficked to powerful men, and moved across multiple jurisdictions while still underage. She identifies Epstein’s residences, flight patterns, intermediaries, and specific encounters, placing her allegations firmly inside the broader trafficking structure rather than as isolated claims. The testimony was preserved on video precisely because her lawyers anticipated that credibility, consistency, and demeanor would become central issues in the defamation battle that followed. It also captured Giuffre under oath before years of public pressure, media narratives, and evolving legal strategies could reshape the record.<br /><br />What made this deposition legally explosive was its direct role in the defamation and civil litigation between Dershowitz and the Edwards–Cassell team, after Giuffre publicly accused Dershowitz and he responded with an aggressive campaign claiming she had fabricated the allegations and falsely implicated him. The video became a critical piece of evidence in determining whether Giuffre’s statements were knowingly false or grounded in a consistent trafficking account supported by contemporaneous detail. Dershowitz’s lawyers later argued that contradictions, memory gaps, and timeline disputes undermined her credibility, while Giuffre’s side pointed to the overall coherence of her narrative and the corroborating travel and contact records emerging in parallel cases. Long before the unsealing battles and public reckonings, this deposition quietly locked in one of the earliest comprehensive sworn accounts of Epstein’s trafficking network—and the legal fault line that would later fracture the reputations of some of the most powerful lawyers and institutions tied to the case.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Giuffre%20v.%20Maxwell,%20No.%20115-cv-07433%20(S.D.N.Y.%202015)/1257-12.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1257-12.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>878</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s Deposition in Edwards and Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz (Part 3)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/virginia-roberts-giuffre-s-deposition-in-edwards-and-cassell-v-alan-dershowitz-part-3--73068648</link><description><![CDATA[The videotaped deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre taken on January 16, 2016, in Fort Lauderdale sits at the center of the bitter legal war between Epstein survivors’ attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell and Alan Dershowitz, who was accused by Giuffre of sexually abusing her when she was a minor trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein. In the deposition, Giuffre gives a detailed, sworn narrative of how she was recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell, groomed, trafficked to powerful men, and moved across multiple jurisdictions while still underage. She identifies Epstein’s residences, flight patterns, intermediaries, and specific encounters, placing her allegations firmly inside the broader trafficking structure rather than as isolated claims. The testimony was preserved on video precisely because her lawyers anticipated that credibility, consistency, and demeanor would become central issues in the defamation battle that followed. It also captured Giuffre under oath before years of public pressure, media narratives, and evolving legal strategies could reshape the record.<br /><br />What made this deposition legally explosive was its direct role in the defamation and civil litigation between Dershowitz and the Edwards–Cassell team, after Giuffre publicly accused Dershowitz and he responded with an aggressive campaign claiming she had fabricated the allegations and falsely implicated him. The video became a critical piece of evidence in determining whether Giuffre’s statements were knowingly false or grounded in a consistent trafficking account supported by contemporaneous detail. Dershowitz’s lawyers later argued that contradictions, memory gaps, and timeline disputes undermined her credibility, while Giuffre’s side pointed to the overall coherence of her narrative and the corroborating travel and contact records emerging in parallel cases. Long before the unsealing battles and public reckonings, this deposition quietly locked in one of the earliest comprehensive sworn accounts of Epstein’s trafficking network—and the legal fault line that would later fracture the reputations of some of the most powerful lawyers and institutions tied to the case.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Giuffre%20v.%20Maxwell,%20No.%20115-cv-07433%20(S.D.N.Y.%202015)/1257-12.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1257-12.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73068648</guid><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73068648/virginiadershdeposition3_1.mp3" length="12846019" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/40c9416b-54a9-42a7-84a1-a253d66ad726/40c9416b-54a9-42a7-84a1-a253d66ad726.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/40c9416b-54a9-42a7-84a1-a253d66ad726/40c9416b-54a9-42a7-84a1-a253d66ad726.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/40c9416b-54a9-42a7-84a1-a253d66ad726/40c9416b-54a9-42a7-84a1-a253d66ad726.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The videotaped deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre taken on January 16, 2016, in Fort Lauderdale sits at the center of the bitter legal war between Epstein survivors’ attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell and Alan Dershowitz, who was accused...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The videotaped deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre taken on January 16, 2016, in Fort Lauderdale sits at the center of the bitter legal war between Epstein survivors’ attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell and Alan Dershowitz, who was accused by Giuffre of sexually abusing her when she was a minor trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein. In the deposition, Giuffre gives a detailed, sworn narrative of how she was recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell, groomed, trafficked to powerful men, and moved across multiple jurisdictions while still underage. She identifies Epstein’s residences, flight patterns, intermediaries, and specific encounters, placing her allegations firmly inside the broader trafficking structure rather than as isolated claims. The testimony was preserved on video precisely because her lawyers anticipated that credibility, consistency, and demeanor would become central issues in the defamation battle that followed. It also captured Giuffre under oath before years of public pressure, media narratives, and evolving legal strategies could reshape the record.<br /><br />What made this deposition legally explosive was its direct role in the defamation and civil litigation between Dershowitz and the Edwards–Cassell team, after Giuffre publicly accused Dershowitz and he responded with an aggressive campaign claiming she had fabricated the allegations and falsely implicated him. The video became a critical piece of evidence in determining whether Giuffre’s statements were knowingly false or grounded in a consistent trafficking account supported by contemporaneous detail. Dershowitz’s lawyers later argued that contradictions, memory gaps, and timeline disputes undermined her credibility, while Giuffre’s side pointed to the overall coherence of her narrative and the corroborating travel and contact records emerging in parallel cases. Long before the unsealing battles and public reckonings, this deposition quietly locked in one of the earliest comprehensive sworn accounts of Epstein’s trafficking network—and the legal fault line that would later fracture the reputations of some of the most powerful lawyers and institutions tied to the case.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Giuffre%20v.%20Maxwell,%20No.%20115-cv-07433%20(S.D.N.Y.%202015)/1257-12.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1257-12.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>803</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s Deposition in Edwards and Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz (Part 2)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/virginia-roberts-giuffre-s-deposition-in-edwards-and-cassell-v-alan-dershowitz-part-2--73068649</link><description><![CDATA[The videotaped deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre taken on January 16, 2016, in Fort Lauderdale sits at the center of the bitter legal war between Epstein survivors’ attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell and Alan Dershowitz, who was accused by Giuffre of sexually abusing her when she was a minor trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein. In the deposition, Giuffre gives a detailed, sworn narrative of how she was recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell, groomed, trafficked to powerful men, and moved across multiple jurisdictions while still underage. She identifies Epstein’s residences, flight patterns, intermediaries, and specific encounters, placing her allegations firmly inside the broader trafficking structure rather than as isolated claims. The testimony was preserved on video precisely because her lawyers anticipated that credibility, consistency, and demeanor would become central issues in the defamation battle that followed. It also captured Giuffre under oath before years of public pressure, media narratives, and evolving legal strategies could reshape the record.<br /><br />What made this deposition legally explosive was its direct role in the defamation and civil litigation between Dershowitz and the Edwards–Cassell team, after Giuffre publicly accused Dershowitz and he responded with an aggressive campaign claiming she had fabricated the allegations and falsely implicated him. The video became a critical piece of evidence in determining whether Giuffre’s statements were knowingly false or grounded in a consistent trafficking account supported by contemporaneous detail. Dershowitz’s lawyers later argued that contradictions, memory gaps, and timeline disputes undermined her credibility, while Giuffre’s side pointed to the overall coherence of her narrative and the corroborating travel and contact records emerging in parallel cases. Long before the unsealing battles and public reckonings, this deposition quietly locked in one of the earliest comprehensive sworn accounts of Epstein’s trafficking network—and the legal fault line that would later fracture the reputations of some of the most powerful lawyers and institutions tied to the case.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Giuffre%20v.%20Maxwell,%20No.%20115-cv-07433%20(S.D.N.Y.%202015)/1257-12.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1257-12.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73068649</guid><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73068649/virginiadershdeposition2_1.mp3" length="11668210" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1e5d7091-dd29-4459-8419-2b8e2967a276/1e5d7091-dd29-4459-8419-2b8e2967a276.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1e5d7091-dd29-4459-8419-2b8e2967a276/1e5d7091-dd29-4459-8419-2b8e2967a276.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1e5d7091-dd29-4459-8419-2b8e2967a276/1e5d7091-dd29-4459-8419-2b8e2967a276.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The videotaped deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre taken on January 16, 2016, in Fort Lauderdale sits at the center of the bitter legal war between Epstein survivors’ attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell and Alan Dershowitz, who was accused...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The videotaped deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre taken on January 16, 2016, in Fort Lauderdale sits at the center of the bitter legal war between Epstein survivors’ attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell and Alan Dershowitz, who was accused by Giuffre of sexually abusing her when she was a minor trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein. In the deposition, Giuffre gives a detailed, sworn narrative of how she was recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell, groomed, trafficked to powerful men, and moved across multiple jurisdictions while still underage. She identifies Epstein’s residences, flight patterns, intermediaries, and specific encounters, placing her allegations firmly inside the broader trafficking structure rather than as isolated claims. The testimony was preserved on video precisely because her lawyers anticipated that credibility, consistency, and demeanor would become central issues in the defamation battle that followed. It also captured Giuffre under oath before years of public pressure, media narratives, and evolving legal strategies could reshape the record.<br /><br />What made this deposition legally explosive was its direct role in the defamation and civil litigation between Dershowitz and the Edwards–Cassell team, after Giuffre publicly accused Dershowitz and he responded with an aggressive campaign claiming she had fabricated the allegations and falsely implicated him. The video became a critical piece of evidence in determining whether Giuffre’s statements were knowingly false or grounded in a consistent trafficking account supported by contemporaneous detail. Dershowitz’s lawyers later argued that contradictions, memory gaps, and timeline disputes undermined her credibility, while Giuffre’s side pointed to the overall coherence of her narrative and the corroborating travel and contact records emerging in parallel cases. Long before the unsealing battles and public reckonings, this deposition quietly locked in one of the earliest comprehensive sworn accounts of Epstein’s trafficking network—and the legal fault line that would later fracture the reputations of some of the most powerful lawyers and institutions tied to the case.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Giuffre%20v.%20Maxwell,%20No.%20115-cv-07433%20(S.D.N.Y.%202015)/1257-12.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1257-12.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>730</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s Deposition in Edwards and Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz (Part 1)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/virginia-roberts-giuffre-s-deposition-in-edwards-and-cassell-v-alan-dershowitz-part-1--73068651</link><description><![CDATA[The videotaped deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre taken on January 16, 2016, in Fort Lauderdale sits at the center of the bitter legal war between Epstein survivors’ attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell and Alan Dershowitz, who was accused by Giuffre of sexually abusing her when she was a minor trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein. In the deposition, Giuffre gives a detailed, sworn narrative of how she was recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell, groomed, trafficked to powerful men, and moved across multiple jurisdictions while still underage. She identifies Epstein’s residences, flight patterns, intermediaries, and specific encounters, placing her allegations firmly inside the broader trafficking structure rather than as isolated claims. The testimony was preserved on video precisely because her lawyers anticipated that credibility, consistency, and demeanor would become central issues in the defamation battle that followed. It also captured Giuffre under oath before years of public pressure, media narratives, and evolving legal strategies could reshape the record.<br /><br />What made this deposition legally explosive was its direct role in the defamation and civil litigation between Dershowitz and the Edwards–Cassell team, after Giuffre publicly accused Dershowitz and he responded with an aggressive campaign claiming she had fabricated the allegations and falsely implicated him. The video became a critical piece of evidence in determining whether Giuffre’s statements were knowingly false or grounded in a consistent trafficking account supported by contemporaneous detail. Dershowitz’s lawyers later argued that contradictions, memory gaps, and timeline disputes undermined her credibility, while Giuffre’s side pointed to the overall coherence of her narrative and the corroborating travel and contact records emerging in parallel cases. Long before the unsealing battles and public reckonings, this deposition quietly locked in one of the earliest comprehensive sworn accounts of Epstein’s trafficking network—and the legal fault line that would later fracture the reputations of some of the most powerful lawyers and institutions tied to the case.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Giuffre%20v.%20Maxwell,%20No.%20115-cv-07433%20(S.D.N.Y.%202015)/1257-12.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1257-12.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73068651</guid><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73068651/virginiadershdeposition1_1.mp3" length="14013379" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/bec923fe-b96f-45cd-87fe-3c182a6b8376/bec923fe-b96f-45cd-87fe-3c182a6b8376.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/bec923fe-b96f-45cd-87fe-3c182a6b8376/bec923fe-b96f-45cd-87fe-3c182a6b8376.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/bec923fe-b96f-45cd-87fe-3c182a6b8376/bec923fe-b96f-45cd-87fe-3c182a6b8376.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The videotaped deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre taken on January 16, 2016, in Fort Lauderdale sits at the center of the bitter legal war between Epstein survivors’ attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell and Alan Dershowitz, who was accused...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The videotaped deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre taken on January 16, 2016, in Fort Lauderdale sits at the center of the bitter legal war between Epstein survivors’ attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell and Alan Dershowitz, who was accused by Giuffre of sexually abusing her when she was a minor trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein. In the deposition, Giuffre gives a detailed, sworn narrative of how she was recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell, groomed, trafficked to powerful men, and moved across multiple jurisdictions while still underage. She identifies Epstein’s residences, flight patterns, intermediaries, and specific encounters, placing her allegations firmly inside the broader trafficking structure rather than as isolated claims. The testimony was preserved on video precisely because her lawyers anticipated that credibility, consistency, and demeanor would become central issues in the defamation battle that followed. It also captured Giuffre under oath before years of public pressure, media narratives, and evolving legal strategies could reshape the record.<br /><br />What made this deposition legally explosive was its direct role in the defamation and civil litigation between Dershowitz and the Edwards–Cassell team, after Giuffre publicly accused Dershowitz and he responded with an aggressive campaign claiming she had fabricated the allegations and falsely implicated him. The video became a critical piece of evidence in determining whether Giuffre’s statements were knowingly false or grounded in a consistent trafficking account supported by contemporaneous detail. Dershowitz’s lawyers later argued that contradictions, memory gaps, and timeline disputes undermined her credibility, while Giuffre’s side pointed to the overall coherence of her narrative and the corroborating travel and contact records emerging in parallel cases. Long before the unsealing battles and public reckonings, this deposition quietly locked in one of the earliest comprehensive sworn accounts of Epstein’s trafficking network—and the legal fault line that would later fracture the reputations of some of the most powerful lawyers and institutions tied to the case.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Giuffre%20v.%20Maxwell,%20No.%20115-cv-07433%20(S.D.N.Y.%202015)/1257-12.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1257-12.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>876</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Tyler Robinson and the Cost of a Capital Trial (7/20/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-and-the-cost-of-a-capital-trial-7-20-26--73057366</link><description><![CDATA[Utah taxpayers could ultimately spend more than $10 million defending Tyler Robinson, the man accused of murdering Charlie Kirk, because prosecutors are seeking the death penalty and Robinson has been declared unable to pay for his own representation. Utah County initially approved $1 million to cover expenses for both the prosecution and Robinson’s specialized defense team, while officials later indicated that another $1 million in state funding would be required. Legal experts say the final cost could rise dramatically because capital cases require experienced death-penalty attorneys, extensive expert testimony, separate guilt and sentencing phases, and potentially years of appeals if Robinson is convicted.<br /><br />Robinson’s attorneys have filed numerous motions challenging prosecutors, seeking limits on courtroom cameras and pressing other procedural issues that have slowed the case. Former prosecutor Neama Rahmani said the strategy appears designed to increase pressure on the state to offer Robinson a plea agreement carrying life in prison without parole, similar to the resolution reached in the Bryan Kohberger case. Utah defense attorney Nathan Evershed said delays are common in capital litigation because the passage of time can create an opportunity for negotiations once emotions surrounding the crime are less intense. Judge Tony Graf has also proceeded cautiously, and Robinson still does not have a trial date as the court considers whether prosecutors presented sufficient evidence during the preliminary hearing to move the case forward.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://nypost.com/2026/07/14/us-news/taxpayers-could-end-up-shelling-out-more-than-10m-for-lawyers-to-defend-accused-charler-kirk-killer-tyler-robinson/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Taxpayers could end up shelling out more than $10M for lawyers to defend accused Charlie Kirk killer Tyler Robinson</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73057366</guid><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73057366/robinsoncostofdefense.mp3" length="13458329" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/917ddfc2-8d30-48e3-b44c-36c5077ce6cc/917ddfc2-8d30-48e3-b44c-36c5077ce6cc.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/917ddfc2-8d30-48e3-b44c-36c5077ce6cc/917ddfc2-8d30-48e3-b44c-36c5077ce6cc.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/917ddfc2-8d30-48e3-b44c-36c5077ce6cc/917ddfc2-8d30-48e3-b44c-36c5077ce6cc.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Utah taxpayers could ultimately spend more than $10 million defending Tyler Robinson, the man accused of murdering Charlie Kirk, because prosecutors are seeking the death penalty and Robinson has been declared unable to pay for his own representation....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Utah taxpayers could ultimately spend more than $10 million defending Tyler Robinson, the man accused of murdering Charlie Kirk, because prosecutors are seeking the death penalty and Robinson has been declared unable to pay for his own representation. Utah County initially approved $1 million to cover expenses for both the prosecution and Robinson’s specialized defense team, while officials later indicated that another $1 million in state funding would be required. Legal experts say the final cost could rise dramatically because capital cases require experienced death-penalty attorneys, extensive expert testimony, separate guilt and sentencing phases, and potentially years of appeals if Robinson is convicted.<br /><br />Robinson’s attorneys have filed numerous motions challenging prosecutors, seeking limits on courtroom cameras and pressing other procedural issues that have slowed the case. Former prosecutor Neama Rahmani said the strategy appears designed to increase pressure on the state to offer Robinson a plea agreement carrying life in prison without parole, similar to the resolution reached in the Bryan Kohberger case. Utah defense attorney Nathan Evershed said delays are common in capital litigation because the passage of time can create an opportunity for negotiations once emotions surrounding the crime are less intense. Judge Tony Graf has also proceeded cautiously, and Robinson still does not have a trial date as the court considers whether prosecutors presented sufficient evidence during the preliminary hearing to move the case forward.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://nypost.com/2026/07/14/us-news/taxpayers-could-end-up-shelling-out-more-than-10m-for-lawyers-to-defend-accused-charler-kirk-killer-tyler-robinson/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Taxpayers could end up shelling out more than $10M for lawyers to defend accused Charlie Kirk killer Tyler Robinson</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>842</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Election Fraud Claims and the Epstein Contradiction (Part 2) (7/20/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/election-fraud-claims-and-the-epstein-contradiction-part-2-7-20-26--73057363</link><description><![CDATA[Trump’s election-integrity speech exposed a glaring double standard in how his administration treats government records. When FBI, CIA, or intelligence-community files appear to support his claims about election fraud, he presents them as authoritative proof of a hidden conspiracy and demands that the public trust their contents. Yet when the Epstein record raises uncomfortable questions about powerful people, institutional failures, and years of documented evidence, the administration suddenly emphasizes uncertainty, context, and the danger of drawing conclusions. The same agencies are treated as credible when their files help Trump and corrupt or unreliable when their records threaten his political interests. That is not principled skepticism or transparency. It is selective belief designed to protect the administration and weaponize government information against its enemies.<br /><br />The hypocrisy is especially offensive because the Epstein case rests on far more than rumors, including survivor testimony, court records, criminal convictions, financial evidence, investigative files, and decades of documented institutional misconduct. Trump cannot claim that buried intelligence files deserve national attention while dismissing demands to fully examine another archive assembled by many of the same institutions. Either government secrecy deserves scrutiny and evidence should be followed wherever it leads, or those standards mean nothing. By promoting election files while minimizing Epstein records, the administration has shown that it does not care about truth as a consistent principle. It cares about information only when that information benefits Trump, and its silence and evasiveness on Epstein reveal the emptiness of every speech it gives about transparency, accountability, and exposing corruption.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73057363</guid><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 18:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73057363/trumpepsteinhypocrisy2.mp3" length="13058342" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6c5bbb66-6147-4f06-82e9-afc7fc362998/6c5bbb66-6147-4f06-82e9-afc7fc362998.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6c5bbb66-6147-4f06-82e9-afc7fc362998/6c5bbb66-6147-4f06-82e9-afc7fc362998.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6c5bbb66-6147-4f06-82e9-afc7fc362998/6c5bbb66-6147-4f06-82e9-afc7fc362998.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Trump’s election-integrity speech exposed a glaring double standard in how his administration treats government records. When FBI, CIA, or intelligence-community files appear to support his claims about election fraud, he presents them as...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Trump’s election-integrity speech exposed a glaring double standard in how his administration treats government records. When FBI, CIA, or intelligence-community files appear to support his claims about election fraud, he presents them as authoritative proof of a hidden conspiracy and demands that the public trust their contents. Yet when the Epstein record raises uncomfortable questions about powerful people, institutional failures, and years of documented evidence, the administration suddenly emphasizes uncertainty, context, and the danger of drawing conclusions. The same agencies are treated as credible when their files help Trump and corrupt or unreliable when their records threaten his political interests. That is not principled skepticism or transparency. It is selective belief designed to protect the administration and weaponize government information against its enemies.<br /><br />The hypocrisy is especially offensive because the Epstein case rests on far more than rumors, including survivor testimony, court records, criminal convictions, financial evidence, investigative files, and decades of documented institutional misconduct. Trump cannot claim that buried intelligence files deserve national attention while dismissing demands to fully examine another archive assembled by many of the same institutions. Either government secrecy deserves scrutiny and evidence should be followed wherever it leads, or those standards mean nothing. By promoting election files while minimizing Epstein records, the administration has shown that it does not care about truth as a consistent principle. It cares about information only when that information benefits Trump, and its silence and evasiveness on Epstein reveal the emptiness of every speech it gives about transparency, accountability, and exposing corruption.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>817</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Election Fraud Claims and the Epstein Contradiction (Part 1) (7/20/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/election-fraud-claims-and-the-epstein-contradiction-part-1-7-20-26--73057364</link><description><![CDATA[Trump’s election-integrity speech exposed a glaring double standard in how his administration treats government records. When FBI, CIA, or intelligence-community files appear to support his claims about election fraud, he presents them as authoritative proof of a hidden conspiracy and demands that the public trust their contents. Yet when the Epstein record raises uncomfortable questions about powerful people, institutional failures, and years of documented evidence, the administration suddenly emphasizes uncertainty, context, and the danger of drawing conclusions. The same agencies are treated as credible when their files help Trump and corrupt or unreliable when their records threaten his political interests. That is not principled skepticism or transparency. It is selective belief designed to protect the administration and weaponize government information against its enemies.<br /><br />The hypocrisy is especially offensive because the Epstein case rests on far more than rumors, including survivor testimony, court records, criminal convictions, financial evidence, investigative files, and decades of documented institutional misconduct. Trump cannot claim that buried intelligence files deserve national attention while dismissing demands to fully examine another archive assembled by many of the same institutions. Either government secrecy deserves scrutiny and evidence should be followed wherever it leads, or those standards mean nothing. By promoting election files while minimizing Epstein records, the administration has shown that it does not care about truth as a consistent principle. It cares about information only when that information benefits Trump, and its silence and evasiveness on Epstein reveal the emptiness of every speech it gives about transparency, accountability, and exposing corruption.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73057364</guid><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73057364/trumpepsteinhypocrisy1.mp3" length="12466094" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d190397f-b0af-4a98-9a4d-92389580b84f/d190397f-b0af-4a98-9a4d-92389580b84f.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d190397f-b0af-4a98-9a4d-92389580b84f/d190397f-b0af-4a98-9a4d-92389580b84f.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d190397f-b0af-4a98-9a4d-92389580b84f/d190397f-b0af-4a98-9a4d-92389580b84f.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Trump’s election-integrity speech exposed a glaring double standard in how his administration treats government records. When FBI, CIA, or intelligence-community files appear to support his claims about election fraud, he presents them as...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Trump’s election-integrity speech exposed a glaring double standard in how his administration treats government records. When FBI, CIA, or intelligence-community files appear to support his claims about election fraud, he presents them as authoritative proof of a hidden conspiracy and demands that the public trust their contents. Yet when the Epstein record raises uncomfortable questions about powerful people, institutional failures, and years of documented evidence, the administration suddenly emphasizes uncertainty, context, and the danger of drawing conclusions. The same agencies are treated as credible when their files help Trump and corrupt or unreliable when their records threaten his political interests. That is not principled skepticism or transparency. It is selective belief designed to protect the administration and weaponize government information against its enemies.<br /><br />The hypocrisy is especially offensive because the Epstein case rests on far more than rumors, including survivor testimony, court records, criminal convictions, financial evidence, investigative files, and decades of documented institutional misconduct. Trump cannot claim that buried intelligence files deserve national attention while dismissing demands to fully examine another archive assembled by many of the same institutions. Either government secrecy deserves scrutiny and evidence should be followed wherever it leads, or those standards mean nothing. By promoting election files while minimizing Epstein records, the administration has shown that it does not care about truth as a consistent principle. It cares about information only when that information benefits Trump, and its silence and evasiveness on Epstein reveal the emptiness of every speech it gives about transparency, accountability, and exposing corruption.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>780</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Todd Blanche Meets Epstein Survivors as Confirmation Vote Hangs in the Balance (7/20/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/todd-blanche-meets-epstein-survivors-as-confirmation-vote-hangs-in-the-balance-7-20-26--73057367</link><description><![CDATA[Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche met with several Jeffrey Epstein survivors at the Justice Department as his confirmation vote remained uncertain in the Senate. Afterward, Annie Farmer said the meeting strengthened her belief that senators should reject his nomination, describing Blanche as abrasive, condescending and deliberately noncommittal. Farmer said Blanche would not promise to investigate why the FBI ignored her sister Maria Farmer’s 1996 complaint, believed to be the first known federal report accusing Epstein of sexually exploiting minors. She also accused Blanche of refusing to accept responsibility for failures under his leadership, withholding documents related to charging decisions and providing an unsatisfactory explanation for his previous meeting with Ghislaine Maxwell.<br /><br />Blanche characterized the meeting as productive and said he encouraged survivors to provide any information that could support new prosecutions, although he acknowledged that they did not present new evidence during the discussion. The meeting occurred after Republican Sen. Thom Tillis said he would not support moving Blanche’s nomination out of the Senate Judiciary Committee until Blanche personally met with Epstein’s victims. Survivor Dani Bensky had testified that Blanche repeatedly failed to respond to her requests for a meeting, while Blanche initially gave conflicting answers about whether he could meet directly with represented survivors. Tillis said he was trying to support the nomination, but made clear that Blanche’s treatment of the survivors would be an important factor in securing his vote.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://abcnews.com/Politics/blanche-meet-epstein-victims-earn-confirmation-vote-sen/story?id=134823103" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein survivor says acting AG Blanche was 'abrasive, condescending' during meeting - ABC News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73057367</guid><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73057367/blanchemeetssurvivors.mp3" length="12807985" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/66f02bc7-791f-4902-be31-ca7caab0944e/66f02bc7-791f-4902-be31-ca7caab0944e.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/66f02bc7-791f-4902-be31-ca7caab0944e/66f02bc7-791f-4902-be31-ca7caab0944e.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/66f02bc7-791f-4902-be31-ca7caab0944e/66f02bc7-791f-4902-be31-ca7caab0944e.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche met with several Jeffrey Epstein survivors at the Justice Department as his confirmation vote remained uncertain in the Senate. Afterward, Annie Farmer said the meeting strengthened her belief that senators should...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche met with several Jeffrey Epstein survivors at the Justice Department as his confirmation vote remained uncertain in the Senate. Afterward, Annie Farmer said the meeting strengthened her belief that senators should reject his nomination, describing Blanche as abrasive, condescending and deliberately noncommittal. Farmer said Blanche would not promise to investigate why the FBI ignored her sister Maria Farmer’s 1996 complaint, believed to be the first known federal report accusing Epstein of sexually exploiting minors. She also accused Blanche of refusing to accept responsibility for failures under his leadership, withholding documents related to charging decisions and providing an unsatisfactory explanation for his previous meeting with Ghislaine Maxwell.<br /><br />Blanche characterized the meeting as productive and said he encouraged survivors to provide any information that could support new prosecutions, although he acknowledged that they did not present new evidence during the discussion. The meeting occurred after Republican Sen. Thom Tillis said he would not support moving Blanche’s nomination out of the Senate Judiciary Committee until Blanche personally met with Epstein’s victims. Survivor Dani Bensky had testified that Blanche repeatedly failed to respond to her requests for a meeting, while Blanche initially gave conflicting answers about whether he could meet directly with represented survivors. Tillis said he was trying to support the nomination, but made clear that Blanche’s treatment of the survivors would be an important factor in securing his vote.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://abcnews.com/Politics/blanche-meet-epstein-victims-earn-confirmation-vote-sen/story?id=134823103" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein survivor says acting AG Blanche was 'abrasive, condescending' during meeting - ABC News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>801</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Anti-Monarchy Activists Bring the Epstein Scandal Inside Buckingham Palace (7/20/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/anti-monarchy-activists-bring-the-epstein-scandal-inside-buckingham-palace-7-20-26--73057365</link><description><![CDATA[Two activists from the anti-monarchy group Republic entered Buckingham Palace during public visiting hours and staged a protest inside the Throne Room. After blending in with other tourists, they unveiled a large image of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor with Jeffrey Epstein and displayed a banner asking, “What did you know?” The demonstration was designed to confront the monarchy over its handling of the Epstein scandal and to demand answers about what senior members of the royal family, including King Charles and Prince William, may have known about Andrew’s relationship with Epstein.<br /><br />Republic argued that the royal household has relied on secrecy and institutional protection rather than providing a full account of Andrew’s conduct and the extent of the palace’s knowledge. The group’s chief executive, Graham Smith, said it was implausible that senior royals and palace officials remained unaware of the controversy surrounding Andrew for so many years. The protest comes amid renewed scrutiny of Andrew following damaging disclosures about his communications with Epstein and continuing investigations into alleged misconduct. Buckingham Palace did not immediately comment on the demonstration.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-15973723/Protesters-storm-Buckingham-Palace.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Anti-monarchy protesters unfurl Andrew and Epstein banner in Buckingham Palace throne room | Daily Mail Online</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73057365</guid><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73057365/epsteinandrewbannerbuckingham.mp3" length="10566888" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c94e1820-4b0e-426d-801d-61110463eb50/c94e1820-4b0e-426d-801d-61110463eb50.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c94e1820-4b0e-426d-801d-61110463eb50/c94e1820-4b0e-426d-801d-61110463eb50.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c94e1820-4b0e-426d-801d-61110463eb50/c94e1820-4b0e-426d-801d-61110463eb50.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Two activists from the anti-monarchy group Republic entered Buckingham Palace during public visiting hours and staged a protest inside the Throne Room. After blending in with other tourists, they unveiled a large image of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Two activists from the anti-monarchy group Republic entered Buckingham Palace during public visiting hours and staged a protest inside the Throne Room. After blending in with other tourists, they unveiled a large image of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor with Jeffrey Epstein and displayed a banner asking, “What did you know?” The demonstration was designed to confront the monarchy over its handling of the Epstein scandal and to demand answers about what senior members of the royal family, including King Charles and Prince William, may have known about Andrew’s relationship with Epstein.<br /><br />Republic argued that the royal household has relied on secrecy and institutional protection rather than providing a full account of Andrew’s conduct and the extent of the palace’s knowledge. The group’s chief executive, Graham Smith, said it was implausible that senior royals and palace officials remained unaware of the controversy surrounding Andrew for so many years. The protest comes amid renewed scrutiny of Andrew following damaging disclosures about his communications with Epstein and continuing investigations into alleged misconduct. Buckingham Palace did not immediately comment on the demonstration.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-15973723/Protesters-storm-Buckingham-Palace.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Anti-monarchy protesters unfurl Andrew and Epstein banner in Buckingham Palace throne room | Daily Mail Online</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>661</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   PROMIS, Maxwell, Mossad, and Epstein’s Network (7/20/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-promis-maxwell-mossad-and-epstein-s-network-7-20-26--73056022</link><description><![CDATA[The PROMIS software scandal and the Jeffrey Epstein case, while separated by decades and context, share strikingly similar hallmarks. PROMIS began as a prosecutorial tool but was allegedly modified by intelligence services like Mossad to include backdoors, enabling covert surveillance when installed in foreign governments and financial institutions. Robert Maxwell, the British media tycoon and suspected Mossad operative, was said to have played a major role in distributing this compromised software worldwide. His involvement linked media, finance, and espionage, and his mysterious death only deepened suspicions. PROMIS thus became emblematic of how intelligence agencies use front men, plausible enterprises, and legal suppression to conceal operations while extracting information and leverage from their targets.<br /><br />Epstein’s operation followed a parallel structure. Through Ghislaine Maxwell — Robert Maxwell’s daughter — the same networks of access and intelligence may have carried forward into a different form of compromise: sexual blackmail rather than software surveillance. Epstein’s properties were wired for monitoring, his connections spanned politics and finance, and his prosecution was undermined by plea deals and sealed files, much like PROMIS inquiries were stifled by classified reports and redactions. In both scandals, powerful people were protected, evidence was obscured, and key figures died under suspicious circumstances. The echoes between PROMIS and Epstein suggest not isolated scandals but a recurring playbook of intelligence tradecraft: fronts, leverage, secrecy, and coverups designed to protect those at the very top.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73056022</guid><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 10:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73056022/megapromisepstein.mp3" length="24046489" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7da17a81-3353-49a3-8eab-18f07f198f90/7da17a81-3353-49a3-8eab-18f07f198f90.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7da17a81-3353-49a3-8eab-18f07f198f90/7da17a81-3353-49a3-8eab-18f07f198f90.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7da17a81-3353-49a3-8eab-18f07f198f90/7da17a81-3353-49a3-8eab-18f07f198f90.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The PROMIS software scandal and the Jeffrey Epstein case, while separated by decades and context, share strikingly similar hallmarks. PROMIS began as a prosecutorial tool but was allegedly modified by intelligence services like Mossad to include...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The PROMIS software scandal and the Jeffrey Epstein case, while separated by decades and context, share strikingly similar hallmarks. PROMIS began as a prosecutorial tool but was allegedly modified by intelligence services like Mossad to include backdoors, enabling covert surveillance when installed in foreign governments and financial institutions. Robert Maxwell, the British media tycoon and suspected Mossad operative, was said to have played a major role in distributing this compromised software worldwide. His involvement linked media, finance, and espionage, and his mysterious death only deepened suspicions. PROMIS thus became emblematic of how intelligence agencies use front men, plausible enterprises, and legal suppression to conceal operations while extracting information and leverage from their targets.<br /><br />Epstein’s operation followed a parallel structure. Through Ghislaine Maxwell — Robert Maxwell’s daughter — the same networks of access and intelligence may have carried forward into a different form of compromise: sexual blackmail rather than software surveillance. Epstein’s properties were wired for monitoring, his connections spanned politics and finance, and his prosecution was undermined by plea deals and sealed files, much like PROMIS inquiries were stifled by classified reports and redactions. In both scandals, powerful people were protected, evidence was obscured, and key figures died under suspicious circumstances. The echoes between PROMIS and Epstein suggest not isolated scandals but a recurring playbook of intelligence tradecraft: fronts, leverage, secrecy, and coverups designed to protect those at the very top.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1503</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Virginia Robert's Family Calls For Justice (7/20/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-virginia-robert-s-family-calls-for-justice-7-20-26--73046128</link><description><![CDATA[Virginia Giuffre’s family has been vocal in their criticism of both the delay and the selective nature of the Epstein file disclosures. They’ve expressed deep frustration that the system seems more interested in protecting reputations than delivering justice. According to public remarks made by her father and close family, the so-called “Epstein files” have been curated in a way that shields the most powerful figures involved while offering only token transparency. They argue that the redactions and omissions in these releases are a continuation of the cover-up, and that the victims deserve full access to the unfiltered truth—not a censored version designed to protect elites. For the family, justice is being doled out in fragments, and every delay or watered-down disclosure adds to the pain endured by the survivors.<br /><br />When asked about the Epstein case and the release of the files, Donald Trump has repeatedly attempted to minimize both his personal ties to Epstein and the importance of the files themselves. Most recently, Trump downplayed the documents by calling them a "hoax" and claiming the media only cares because they want to connect him to Epstein, even though he supposedly had a falling out with the disgraced financier years ago. He has consistently insisted he “wasn’t a fan” of Epstein, despite photographic evidence, party attendance, and years of social overlap. Trump’s dismissive tone has angered many Epstein survivors and their advocates, including Giuffre’s family, who view his statements as part of a larger strategy to discredit the victims and muddy the waters around what should be a straightforward reckoning with the truth.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/31/politics/virginia-giuffre-family-epstein-files" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Virginia Giuffre’s family says she would have wanted Epstein documents released | CNN Politics</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73046128</guid><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 08:35:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73046128/megaepsteinsurvivorsignoredbydojvirgfamspeaksout.mp3" length="32309124" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/12c1482b-c5a6-4dbb-b786-5267299ee3b6/12c1482b-c5a6-4dbb-b786-5267299ee3b6.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/12c1482b-c5a6-4dbb-b786-5267299ee3b6/12c1482b-c5a6-4dbb-b786-5267299ee3b6.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/12c1482b-c5a6-4dbb-b786-5267299ee3b6/12c1482b-c5a6-4dbb-b786-5267299ee3b6.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Virginia Giuffre’s family has been vocal in their criticism of both the delay and the selective nature of the Epstein file disclosures. They’ve expressed deep frustration that the system seems more interested in protecting reputations than delivering...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Virginia Giuffre’s family has been vocal in their criticism of both the delay and the selective nature of the Epstein file disclosures. They’ve expressed deep frustration that the system seems more interested in protecting reputations than delivering justice. According to public remarks made by her father and close family, the so-called “Epstein files” have been curated in a way that shields the most powerful figures involved while offering only token transparency. They argue that the redactions and omissions in these releases are a continuation of the cover-up, and that the victims deserve full access to the unfiltered truth—not a censored version designed to protect elites. For the family, justice is being doled out in fragments, and every delay or watered-down disclosure adds to the pain endured by the survivors.<br /><br />When asked about the Epstein case and the release of the files, Donald Trump has repeatedly attempted to minimize both his personal ties to Epstein and the importance of the files themselves. Most recently, Trump downplayed the documents by calling them a "hoax" and claiming the media only cares because they want to connect him to Epstein, even though he supposedly had a falling out with the disgraced financier years ago. He has consistently insisted he “wasn’t a fan” of Epstein, despite photographic evidence, party attendance, and years of social overlap. Trump’s dismissive tone has angered many Epstein survivors and their advocates, including Giuffre’s family, who view his statements as part of a larger strategy to discredit the victims and muddy the waters around what should be a straightforward reckoning with the truth.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/31/politics/virginia-giuffre-family-epstein-files" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Virginia Giuffre’s family says she would have wanted Epstein documents released | CNN Politics</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2020</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Ghislaine Maxwell And Her Plan to Lay Low After Epstein's Arrest (7/20/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-ghislaine-maxwell-and-her-plan-to-lay-low-after-epstein-s-arrest-7-20-26--73035209</link><description><![CDATA[In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.<br /><br />Giuffre’s deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell’s direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein’s residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein’s private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell’s London townhouse, and at Epstein’s New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell’s role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell’s 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me;<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.appealslawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/1090-32.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1090-32.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73035209</guid><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 06:30:01 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73035209/megamaxwelltriedtoflyunderradar.mp3" length="47365298" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c63a7d48-822c-4bb2-a4f1-3bb246a1eea8/c63a7d48-822c-4bb2-a4f1-3bb246a1eea8.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c63a7d48-822c-4bb2-a4f1-3bb246a1eea8/c63a7d48-822c-4bb2-a4f1-3bb246a1eea8.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c63a7d48-822c-4bb2-a4f1-3bb246a1eea8/c63a7d48-822c-4bb2-a4f1-3bb246a1eea8.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.<br /><br />Giuffre’s deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell’s direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein’s residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein’s private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell’s London townhouse, and at Epstein’s New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell’s role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell’s 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me;<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.appealslawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/1090-32.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1090-32.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2961</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Ghislaine Maxwell 2019 SDNY Grand Jury Transcript (Part 8)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-ghislaine-maxwell-2019-sdny-grand-jury-transcript-part-8--73035503</link><description><![CDATA[The newly unsealed New York grand jury materials related to Ghislaine Maxwell provide a clearer window into how federal prosecutors built the case that ultimately led to her conviction. The documents outline the scope of witness testimony, evidentiary focus, and investigative priorities considered by the grand jury, reinforcing that Maxwell was not viewed as a peripheral figure but as a central facilitator within Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking operation. While much of the material aligns with facts already established at trial—including patterns of recruitment, grooming, and abuse—the unsealing confirms that prosecutors presented a structured, victim-centered narrative to the grand jury well before Maxwell’s arrest, countering claims that the case was rushed or politically motivated.<br /><br />At the same time, the documents have drawn attention for what they do not contain. The grand jury materials remain narrowly focused on Maxwell’s conduct and charges, offering little insight into why broader conspiracy cases against other Epstein associates were never pursued in New York. This has fueled renewed scrutiny of prosecutorial discretion and investigative limits, as the records show a deliberate effort to secure Maxwell’s indictment while leaving larger questions about Epstein’s network unresolved. For critics and survivors alike, the unsealing represents both a measure of long-delayed transparency and a reminder of how much of the Epstein story remains outside the bounds of criminal accountability.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73035503</guid><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73035503/nypddetectivemaxwellgrandjury8.mp3" length="14099061" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d26759c4-6efa-473c-ba9b-3853f2d05701/d26759c4-6efa-473c-ba9b-3853f2d05701.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d26759c4-6efa-473c-ba9b-3853f2d05701/d26759c4-6efa-473c-ba9b-3853f2d05701.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d26759c4-6efa-473c-ba9b-3853f2d05701/d26759c4-6efa-473c-ba9b-3853f2d05701.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The newly unsealed New York grand jury materials related to Ghislaine Maxwell provide a clearer window into how federal prosecutors built the case that ultimately led to her conviction. The documents outline the scope of witness testimony, evidentiary...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The newly unsealed New York grand jury materials related to Ghislaine Maxwell provide a clearer window into how federal prosecutors built the case that ultimately led to her conviction. The documents outline the scope of witness testimony, evidentiary focus, and investigative priorities considered by the grand jury, reinforcing that Maxwell was not viewed as a peripheral figure but as a central facilitator within Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking operation. While much of the material aligns with facts already established at trial—including patterns of recruitment, grooming, and abuse—the unsealing confirms that prosecutors presented a structured, victim-centered narrative to the grand jury well before Maxwell’s arrest, countering claims that the case was rushed or politically motivated.<br /><br />At the same time, the documents have drawn attention for what they do not contain. The grand jury materials remain narrowly focused on Maxwell’s conduct and charges, offering little insight into why broader conspiracy cases against other Epstein associates were never pursued in New York. This has fueled renewed scrutiny of prosecutorial discretion and investigative limits, as the records show a deliberate effort to secure Maxwell’s indictment while leaving larger questions about Epstein’s network unresolved. For critics and survivors alike, the unsealing represents both a measure of long-delayed transparency and a reminder of how much of the Epstein story remains outside the bounds of criminal accountability.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>882</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Ghislaine Maxwell 2019 SDNY Grand Jury Transcript (Part 7)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-ghislaine-maxwell-2019-sdny-grand-jury-transcript-part-7--73035506</link><description><![CDATA[The newly unsealed New York grand jury materials related to Ghislaine Maxwell provide a clearer window into how federal prosecutors built the case that ultimately led to her conviction. The documents outline the scope of witness testimony, evidentiary focus, and investigative priorities considered by the grand jury, reinforcing that Maxwell was not viewed as a peripheral figure but as a central facilitator within Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking operation. While much of the material aligns with facts already established at trial—including patterns of recruitment, grooming, and abuse—the unsealing confirms that prosecutors presented a structured, victim-centered narrative to the grand jury well before Maxwell’s arrest, countering claims that the case was rushed or politically motivated.<br /><br />At the same time, the documents have drawn attention for what they do not contain. The grand jury materials remain narrowly focused on Maxwell’s conduct and charges, offering little insight into why broader conspiracy cases against other Epstein associates were never pursued in New York. This has fueled renewed scrutiny of prosecutorial discretion and investigative limits, as the records show a deliberate effort to secure Maxwell’s indictment while leaving larger questions about Epstein’s network unresolved. For critics and survivors alike, the unsealing represents both a measure of long-delayed transparency and a reminder of how much of the Epstein story remains outside the bounds of criminal accountability.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73035506</guid><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73035506/nypddetectivemaxwellgrandjury7.mp3" length="12372471" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/637dd7e3-8798-4e24-acff-3c412961f298/637dd7e3-8798-4e24-acff-3c412961f298.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/637dd7e3-8798-4e24-acff-3c412961f298/637dd7e3-8798-4e24-acff-3c412961f298.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/637dd7e3-8798-4e24-acff-3c412961f298/637dd7e3-8798-4e24-acff-3c412961f298.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The newly unsealed New York grand jury materials related to Ghislaine Maxwell provide a clearer window into how federal prosecutors built the case that ultimately led to her conviction. The documents outline the scope of witness testimony, evidentiary...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The newly unsealed New York grand jury materials related to Ghislaine Maxwell provide a clearer window into how federal prosecutors built the case that ultimately led to her conviction. The documents outline the scope of witness testimony, evidentiary focus, and investigative priorities considered by the grand jury, reinforcing that Maxwell was not viewed as a peripheral figure but as a central facilitator within Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking operation. While much of the material aligns with facts already established at trial—including patterns of recruitment, grooming, and abuse—the unsealing confirms that prosecutors presented a structured, victim-centered narrative to the grand jury well before Maxwell’s arrest, countering claims that the case was rushed or politically motivated.<br /><br />At the same time, the documents have drawn attention for what they do not contain. The grand jury materials remain narrowly focused on Maxwell’s conduct and charges, offering little insight into why broader conspiracy cases against other Epstein associates were never pursued in New York. This has fueled renewed scrutiny of prosecutorial discretion and investigative limits, as the records show a deliberate effort to secure Maxwell’s indictment while leaving larger questions about Epstein’s network unresolved. For critics and survivors alike, the unsealing represents both a measure of long-delayed transparency and a reminder of how much of the Epstein story remains outside the bounds of criminal accountability.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>774</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Ghislaine Maxwell 2019 SDNY Grand Jury Transcript (Part 6)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-ghislaine-maxwell-2019-sdny-grand-jury-transcript-part-6--73035501</link><description><![CDATA[The newly unsealed New York grand jury materials related to Ghislaine Maxwell provide a clearer window into how federal prosecutors built the case that ultimately led to her conviction. The documents outline the scope of witness testimony, evidentiary focus, and investigative priorities considered by the grand jury, reinforcing that Maxwell was not viewed as a peripheral figure but as a central facilitator within Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking operation. While much of the material aligns with facts already established at trial—including patterns of recruitment, grooming, and abuse—the unsealing confirms that prosecutors presented a structured, victim-centered narrative to the grand jury well before Maxwell’s arrest, countering claims that the case was rushed or politically motivated.<br /><br />At the same time, the documents have drawn attention for what they do not contain. The grand jury materials remain narrowly focused on Maxwell’s conduct and charges, offering little insight into why broader conspiracy cases against other Epstein associates were never pursued in New York. This has fueled renewed scrutiny of prosecutorial discretion and investigative limits, as the records show a deliberate effort to secure Maxwell’s indictment while leaving larger questions about Epstein’s network unresolved. For critics and survivors alike, the unsealing represents both a measure of long-delayed transparency and a reminder of how much of the Epstein story remains outside the bounds of criminal accountability.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73035501</guid><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73035501/nypddetectivemaxgrandjury6.mp3" length="13332106" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/53b998e1-2e50-4df8-92d1-fc147eb287e4/53b998e1-2e50-4df8-92d1-fc147eb287e4.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/53b998e1-2e50-4df8-92d1-fc147eb287e4/53b998e1-2e50-4df8-92d1-fc147eb287e4.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/53b998e1-2e50-4df8-92d1-fc147eb287e4/53b998e1-2e50-4df8-92d1-fc147eb287e4.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The newly unsealed New York grand jury materials related to Ghislaine Maxwell provide a clearer window into how federal prosecutors built the case that ultimately led to her conviction. The documents outline the scope of witness testimony, evidentiary...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The newly unsealed New York grand jury materials related to Ghislaine Maxwell provide a clearer window into how federal prosecutors built the case that ultimately led to her conviction. The documents outline the scope of witness testimony, evidentiary focus, and investigative priorities considered by the grand jury, reinforcing that Maxwell was not viewed as a peripheral figure but as a central facilitator within Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking operation. While much of the material aligns with facts already established at trial—including patterns of recruitment, grooming, and abuse—the unsealing confirms that prosecutors presented a structured, victim-centered narrative to the grand jury well before Maxwell’s arrest, countering claims that the case was rushed or politically motivated.<br /><br />At the same time, the documents have drawn attention for what they do not contain. The grand jury materials remain narrowly focused on Maxwell’s conduct and charges, offering little insight into why broader conspiracy cases against other Epstein associates were never pursued in New York. This has fueled renewed scrutiny of prosecutorial discretion and investigative limits, as the records show a deliberate effort to secure Maxwell’s indictment while leaving larger questions about Epstein’s network unresolved. For critics and survivors alike, the unsealing represents both a measure of long-delayed transparency and a reminder of how much of the Epstein story remains outside the bounds of criminal accountability.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>834</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Ghislaine Maxwell 2019 SDNY Grand Jury Transcript (Part 5)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-ghislaine-maxwell-2019-sdny-grand-jury-transcript-part-5--73035507</link><description><![CDATA[The newly unsealed New York grand jury materials related to Ghislaine Maxwell provide a clearer window into how federal prosecutors built the case that ultimately led to her conviction. The documents outline the scope of witness testimony, evidentiary focus, and investigative priorities considered by the grand jury, reinforcing that Maxwell was not viewed as a peripheral figure but as a central facilitator within Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking operation. While much of the material aligns with facts already established at trial—including patterns of recruitment, grooming, and abuse—the unsealing confirms that prosecutors presented a structured, victim-centered narrative to the grand jury well before Maxwell’s arrest, countering claims that the case was rushed or politically motivated.<br /><br />At the same time, the documents have drawn attention for what they do not contain. The grand jury materials remain narrowly focused on Maxwell’s conduct and charges, offering little insight into why broader conspiracy cases against other Epstein associates were never pursued in New York. This has fueled renewed scrutiny of prosecutorial discretion and investigative limits, as the records show a deliberate effort to secure Maxwell’s indictment while leaving larger questions about Epstein’s network unresolved. For critics and survivors alike, the unsealing represents both a measure of long-delayed transparency and a reminder of how much of the Epstein story remains outside the bounds of criminal accountability.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73035507</guid><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73035507/nypddetectivemaxwellgrandjury5.mp3" length="12445196" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e7fac305-bb1b-4209-9698-5748119fdca6/e7fac305-bb1b-4209-9698-5748119fdca6.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e7fac305-bb1b-4209-9698-5748119fdca6/e7fac305-bb1b-4209-9698-5748119fdca6.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e7fac305-bb1b-4209-9698-5748119fdca6/e7fac305-bb1b-4209-9698-5748119fdca6.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The newly unsealed New York grand jury materials related to Ghislaine Maxwell provide a clearer window into how federal prosecutors built the case that ultimately led to her conviction. The documents outline the scope of witness testimony, evidentiary...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The newly unsealed New York grand jury materials related to Ghislaine Maxwell provide a clearer window into how federal prosecutors built the case that ultimately led to her conviction. The documents outline the scope of witness testimony, evidentiary focus, and investigative priorities considered by the grand jury, reinforcing that Maxwell was not viewed as a peripheral figure but as a central facilitator within Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking operation. While much of the material aligns with facts already established at trial—including patterns of recruitment, grooming, and abuse—the unsealing confirms that prosecutors presented a structured, victim-centered narrative to the grand jury well before Maxwell’s arrest, countering claims that the case was rushed or politically motivated.<br /><br />At the same time, the documents have drawn attention for what they do not contain. The grand jury materials remain narrowly focused on Maxwell’s conduct and charges, offering little insight into why broader conspiracy cases against other Epstein associates were never pursued in New York. This has fueled renewed scrutiny of prosecutorial discretion and investigative limits, as the records show a deliberate effort to secure Maxwell’s indictment while leaving larger questions about Epstein’s network unresolved. For critics and survivors alike, the unsealing represents both a measure of long-delayed transparency and a reminder of how much of the Epstein story remains outside the bounds of criminal accountability.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>778</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Lesley Groff And The Transcript From Her Epstein Related Trip to Congress (Part 19) (7/19/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/lesley-groff-and-the-transcript-from-her-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-19-7-19-26--73049814</link><description><![CDATA[Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her central position was that Epstein kept her separated from his criminal life, that she never witnessed abuse, never had a victim disclose abuse to her, and did not knowingly help Epstein or Maxwell commit crimes. She described Epstein as a “master manipulator” who lied to her and kept his “legitimate” world apart from his abuse, while acknowledging that she scheduled massage appointments when Epstein provided names and numbers, sometimes circulated calendars that included those appointments early on, and understood the massages as routine at the time. She said she did not personally meet the massage providers, did not know they were minors or young women, and assumed they were masseuses, even though members pressed her on why an extremely wealthy man would use rotating names and phone numbers instead of a professional massage service.<br /><br />The questioning also focused heavily on Epstein’s network and whether Groff had knowledge of powerful men being provided access to girls or young women through Epstein or Maxwell. Groff repeatedly answered no when asked whether she had arranged massages for prominent figures, knew of sexual activity involving minors or young women, or knew of anyone who knowingly facilitated Epstein’s crimes. She acknowledged scheduling or connecting Epstein with high-profile contacts, including Prince Andrew, Ehud Barak, Larry Summers, George Mitchell, John Kerry, Wesley Clark, Bill Clinton-related circles, and Donald Trump phone calls, but denied arranging Trump travel during her employment and denied knowledge of Trump-related law enforcement communications. She also said she never suspected Epstein or Maxwell of working with any intelligence service. Overall, Groff’s testimony was defensive and narrow: she admitted to being part of the machinery that kept Epstein’s calendar and contacts moving, but insisted she never saw the criminal operation underneath it and never knowingly enabled it.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:  <br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73049814</guid><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73049814/a22e8f2c_b0ae_40e2_8aae_e4d01004d7c2.mp3" length="12507472" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/014d1573-cb3b-4edc-ba73-6f254808b97e/014d1573-cb3b-4edc-ba73-6f254808b97e.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/014d1573-cb3b-4edc-ba73-6f254808b97e/014d1573-cb3b-4edc-ba73-6f254808b97e.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/014d1573-cb3b-4edc-ba73-6f254808b97e/014d1573-cb3b-4edc-ba73-6f254808b97e.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her central position was that Epstein kept her separated from his criminal life, that she never witnessed abuse, never had a victim disclose abuse to her, and did not knowingly help Epstein or Maxwell commit crimes. She described Epstein as a “master manipulator” who lied to her and kept his “legitimate” world apart from his abuse, while acknowledging that she scheduled massage appointments when Epstein provided names and numbers, sometimes circulated calendars that included those appointments early on, and understood the massages as routine at the time. She said she did not personally meet the massage providers, did not know they were minors or young women, and assumed they were masseuses, even though members pressed her on why an extremely wealthy man would use rotating names and phone numbers instead of a professional massage service.<br /><br />The questioning also focused heavily on Epstein’s network and whether Groff had knowledge of powerful men being provided access to girls or young women through Epstein or Maxwell. Groff repeatedly answered no when asked whether she had arranged massages for prominent figures, knew of sexual activity involving minors or young women, or knew of anyone who knowingly facilitated Epstein’s crimes. She acknowledged scheduling or connecting Epstein with high-profile contacts, including Prince Andrew, Ehud Barak, Larry Summers, George Mitchell, John Kerry, Wesley Clark, Bill Clinton-related circles, and Donald Trump phone calls, but denied arranging Trump travel during her employment and denied knowledge of Trump-related law enforcement communications. She also said she never suspected Epstein or Maxwell of working with any intelligence service. Overall, Groff’s testimony was defensive and narrow: she admitted to being part of the machinery that kept Epstein’s calendar and contacts moving, but insisted she never saw the criminal operation underneath it and never knowingly enabled it.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:  <br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>782</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Lesley Groff And The Transcript From Her Epstein Related Trip to Congress (Part 18) (7/19/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/lesley-groff-and-the-transcript-from-her-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-18-7-19-26--73049811</link><description><![CDATA[Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her central position was that Epstein kept her separated from his criminal life, that she never witnessed abuse, never had a victim disclose abuse to her, and did not knowingly help Epstein or Maxwell commit crimes. She described Epstein as a “master manipulator” who lied to her and kept his “legitimate” world apart from his abuse, while acknowledging that she scheduled massage appointments when Epstein provided names and numbers, sometimes circulated calendars that included those appointments early on, and understood the massages as routine at the time. She said she did not personally meet the massage providers, did not know they were minors or young women, and assumed they were masseuses, even though members pressed her on why an extremely wealthy man would use rotating names and phone numbers instead of a professional massage service.<br /><br />The questioning also focused heavily on Epstein’s network and whether Groff had knowledge of powerful men being provided access to girls or young women through Epstein or Maxwell. Groff repeatedly answered no when asked whether she had arranged massages for prominent figures, knew of sexual activity involving minors or young women, or knew of anyone who knowingly facilitated Epstein’s crimes. She acknowledged scheduling or connecting Epstein with high-profile contacts, including Prince Andrew, Ehud Barak, Larry Summers, George Mitchell, John Kerry, Wesley Clark, Bill Clinton-related circles, and Donald Trump phone calls, but denied arranging Trump travel during her employment and denied knowledge of Trump-related law enforcement communications. She also said she never suspected Epstein or Maxwell of working with any intelligence service. Overall, Groff’s testimony was defensive and narrow: she admitted to being part of the machinery that kept Epstein’s calendar and contacts moving, but insisted she never saw the criminal operation underneath it and never knowingly enabled it.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:  <br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73049811</guid><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 18:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73049811/b13ac031_401a_4c05_997e_6d8b393cdac9.mp3" length="12127547" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1eb061a7-8695-481c-abaa-7ad95dcc080e/1eb061a7-8695-481c-abaa-7ad95dcc080e.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1eb061a7-8695-481c-abaa-7ad95dcc080e/1eb061a7-8695-481c-abaa-7ad95dcc080e.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1eb061a7-8695-481c-abaa-7ad95dcc080e/1eb061a7-8695-481c-abaa-7ad95dcc080e.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her central position was that Epstein kept her separated from his criminal life, that she never witnessed abuse, never had a victim disclose abuse to her, and did not knowingly help Epstein or Maxwell commit crimes. She described Epstein as a “master manipulator” who lied to her and kept his “legitimate” world apart from his abuse, while acknowledging that she scheduled massage appointments when Epstein provided names and numbers, sometimes circulated calendars that included those appointments early on, and understood the massages as routine at the time. She said she did not personally meet the massage providers, did not know they were minors or young women, and assumed they were masseuses, even though members pressed her on why an extremely wealthy man would use rotating names and phone numbers instead of a professional massage service.<br /><br />The questioning also focused heavily on Epstein’s network and whether Groff had knowledge of powerful men being provided access to girls or young women through Epstein or Maxwell. Groff repeatedly answered no when asked whether she had arranged massages for prominent figures, knew of sexual activity involving minors or young women, or knew of anyone who knowingly facilitated Epstein’s crimes. She acknowledged scheduling or connecting Epstein with high-profile contacts, including Prince Andrew, Ehud Barak, Larry Summers, George Mitchell, John Kerry, Wesley Clark, Bill Clinton-related circles, and Donald Trump phone calls, but denied arranging Trump travel during her employment and denied knowledge of Trump-related law enforcement communications. She also said she never suspected Epstein or Maxwell of working with any intelligence service. Overall, Groff’s testimony was defensive and narrow: she admitted to being part of the machinery that kept Epstein’s calendar and contacts moving, but insisted she never saw the criminal operation underneath it and never knowingly enabled it.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:  <br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>758</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Lesley Groff And The Transcript From Her Epstein Related Trip to Congress (Part 17) (7/19/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/lesley-groff-and-the-transcript-from-her-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-17-7-19-26--73049805</link><description><![CDATA[Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her central position was that Epstein kept her separated from his criminal life, that she never witnessed abuse, never had a victim disclose abuse to her, and did not knowingly help Epstein or Maxwell commit crimes. She described Epstein as a “master manipulator” who lied to her and kept his “legitimate” world apart from his abuse, while acknowledging that she scheduled massage appointments when Epstein provided names and numbers, sometimes circulated calendars that included those appointments early on, and understood the massages as routine at the time. She said she did not personally meet the massage providers, did not know they were minors or young women, and assumed they were masseuses, even though members pressed her on why an extremely wealthy man would use rotating names and phone numbers instead of a professional massage service.<br /><br />The questioning also focused heavily on Epstein’s network and whether Groff had knowledge of powerful men being provided access to girls or young women through Epstein or Maxwell. Groff repeatedly answered no when asked whether she had arranged massages for prominent figures, knew of sexual activity involving minors or young women, or knew of anyone who knowingly facilitated Epstein’s crimes. She acknowledged scheduling or connecting Epstein with high-profile contacts, including Prince Andrew, Ehud Barak, Larry Summers, George Mitchell, John Kerry, Wesley Clark, Bill Clinton-related circles, and Donald Trump phone calls, but denied arranging Trump travel during her employment and denied knowledge of Trump-related law enforcement communications. She also said she never suspected Epstein or Maxwell of working with any intelligence service. Overall, Groff’s testimony was defensive and narrow: she admitted to being part of the machinery that kept Epstein’s calendar and contacts moving, but insisted she never saw the criminal operation underneath it and never knowingly enabled it.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:  <br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73049805</guid><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73049805/1120ab9b_d38d_4d28_815f_653169019514.mp3" length="13877542" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6a31cd3d-06b3-4bb1-9946-730d6008e3c3/6a31cd3d-06b3-4bb1-9946-730d6008e3c3.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6a31cd3d-06b3-4bb1-9946-730d6008e3c3/6a31cd3d-06b3-4bb1-9946-730d6008e3c3.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6a31cd3d-06b3-4bb1-9946-730d6008e3c3/6a31cd3d-06b3-4bb1-9946-730d6008e3c3.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her central position was that Epstein kept her separated from his criminal life, that she never witnessed abuse, never had a victim disclose abuse to her, and did not knowingly help Epstein or Maxwell commit crimes. She described Epstein as a “master manipulator” who lied to her and kept his “legitimate” world apart from his abuse, while acknowledging that she scheduled massage appointments when Epstein provided names and numbers, sometimes circulated calendars that included those appointments early on, and understood the massages as routine at the time. She said she did not personally meet the massage providers, did not know they were minors or young women, and assumed they were masseuses, even though members pressed her on why an extremely wealthy man would use rotating names and phone numbers instead of a professional massage service.<br /><br />The questioning also focused heavily on Epstein’s network and whether Groff had knowledge of powerful men being provided access to girls or young women through Epstein or Maxwell. Groff repeatedly answered no when asked whether she had arranged massages for prominent figures, knew of sexual activity involving minors or young women, or knew of anyone who knowingly facilitated Epstein’s crimes. She acknowledged scheduling or connecting Epstein with high-profile contacts, including Prince Andrew, Ehud Barak, Larry Summers, George Mitchell, John Kerry, Wesley Clark, Bill Clinton-related circles, and Donald Trump phone calls, but denied arranging Trump travel during her employment and denied knowledge of Trump-related law enforcement communications. She also said she never suspected Epstein or Maxwell of working with any intelligence service. Overall, Groff’s testimony was defensive and narrow: she admitted to being part of the machinery that kept Epstein’s calendar and contacts moving, but insisted she never saw the criminal operation underneath it and never knowingly enabled it.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:  <br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>868</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  How Prince Andrew Became The Most Despised Royal (7/19/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-how-prince-andrew-became-the-most-despised-royal-7-19-26--73045033</link><description><![CDATA[Prince Andrew became the most disliked member of the British royal family through a long collapse in public trust driven overwhelmingly by his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and his handling of the allegations made by Virginia Giuffre. His disastrous 2019 BBC Newsnight interview intensified the damage when he defended his continued association with Epstein, offered explanations that were widely mocked and showed little apparent concern for Epstein’s victims. Andrew subsequently withdrew from public duties, lost his military affiliations and royal patronages, and settled Giuffre’s civil lawsuit in 2022 without admitting liability. Rather than repairing his reputation, his repeated refusals to accept meaningful responsibility created the impression that he considered himself a victim of the scandal rather than a senior royal whose judgment had brought disgrace upon the monarchy.<br /><br />The damage became so severe that Andrew ceased to be merely unpopular and became politically and institutionally toxic. Each new disclosure about his communications with Epstein, his financial arrangements or his efforts to preserve his royal privileges reinforced the belief that wealth and status had protected him from proper scrutiny. By early 2026, YouGov found that only 3 percent of Britons viewed him positively, while 90 percent held an unfavorable opinion, placing him far below every other prominent royal. His downfall reflects more than public anger over one friendship. It represents accumulated disgust over perceived arrogance, evasiveness, entitlement and the failure to provide convincing answers about his place within Epstein’s world.<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73045033</guid><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73045033/megaandrewmostdislikedroyal.mp3" length="52401676" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1fd2a6d4-830e-4ee0-bc2f-8a4fe672905e/1fd2a6d4-830e-4ee0-bc2f-8a4fe672905e.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1fd2a6d4-830e-4ee0-bc2f-8a4fe672905e/1fd2a6d4-830e-4ee0-bc2f-8a4fe672905e.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1fd2a6d4-830e-4ee0-bc2f-8a4fe672905e/1fd2a6d4-830e-4ee0-bc2f-8a4fe672905e.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Prince Andrew became the most disliked member of the British royal family through a long collapse in public trust driven overwhelmingly by his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and his handling of the allegations made by Virginia Giuffre. His...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Prince Andrew became the most disliked member of the British royal family through a long collapse in public trust driven overwhelmingly by his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and his handling of the allegations made by Virginia Giuffre. His disastrous 2019 BBC Newsnight interview intensified the damage when he defended his continued association with Epstein, offered explanations that were widely mocked and showed little apparent concern for Epstein’s victims. Andrew subsequently withdrew from public duties, lost his military affiliations and royal patronages, and settled Giuffre’s civil lawsuit in 2022 without admitting liability. Rather than repairing his reputation, his repeated refusals to accept meaningful responsibility created the impression that he considered himself a victim of the scandal rather than a senior royal whose judgment had brought disgrace upon the monarchy.<br /><br />The damage became so severe that Andrew ceased to be merely unpopular and became politically and institutionally toxic. Each new disclosure about his communications with Epstein, his financial arrangements or his efforts to preserve his royal privileges reinforced the belief that wealth and status had protected him from proper scrutiny. By early 2026, YouGov found that only 3 percent of Britons viewed him positively, while 90 percent held an unfavorable opinion, placing him far below every other prominent royal. His downfall reflects more than public anger over one friendship. It represents accumulated disgust over perceived arrogance, evasiveness, entitlement and the failure to provide convincing answers about his place within Epstein’s world.<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3276</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  How The Ruling To Unseal The Maxwell/Virginia Files Opened The Floodgates (7/19/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-how-the-ruling-to-unseal-the-maxwell-virginia-files-opened-the-floodgates-7-19-26--73045034</link><description><![CDATA[Judge Loretta Preska played the decisive role in beginning the large-scale release of documents from Virginia Giuffre’s defamation lawsuit against Ghislaine Maxwell. After taking responsibility for reviewing the sealed record, Preska rejected the idea that entire categories of court filings should remain hidden indefinitely. She examined the materials individually, weighed legitimate privacy concerns against the public’s right of access and repeatedly ordered depositions, emails, exhibits and witness statements unsealed. Her rulings established that secrecy had to be specifically justified rather than automatically preserved simply because the case involved famous, wealthy or politically connected people.<br /><br />Those decisions got the transparency process moving and created a framework for the gradual release of records that had remained inaccessible for years. Preska continued reviewing objections from people identified in the documents, protecting survivors and sensitive personal information where necessary while refusing to allow embarrassment or reputational concerns alone to justify sealing. Her later orders resulted in additional releases, including the widely publicized unsealing of names and documents in January 2024. Through that sustained judicial review, Preska opened a substantial portion of the evidentiary record and gave the public a clearer view of Epstein and Maxwell’s network, the allegations against them and the information gathered during the Giuffre-Maxwell litigation.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73045034</guid><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73045034/megapreskaunsealsmaxvirgfiles.mp3" length="46934800" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d16b140b-48c6-4f33-b9b5-ea82d6f6399e/d16b140b-48c6-4f33-b9b5-ea82d6f6399e.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d16b140b-48c6-4f33-b9b5-ea82d6f6399e/d16b140b-48c6-4f33-b9b5-ea82d6f6399e.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d16b140b-48c6-4f33-b9b5-ea82d6f6399e/d16b140b-48c6-4f33-b9b5-ea82d6f6399e.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Judge Loretta Preska played the decisive role in beginning the large-scale release of documents from Virginia Giuffre’s defamation lawsuit against Ghislaine Maxwell. After taking responsibility for reviewing the sealed record, Preska rejected the idea...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Judge Loretta Preska played the decisive role in beginning the large-scale release of documents from Virginia Giuffre’s defamation lawsuit against Ghislaine Maxwell. After taking responsibility for reviewing the sealed record, Preska rejected the idea that entire categories of court filings should remain hidden indefinitely. She examined the materials individually, weighed legitimate privacy concerns against the public’s right of access and repeatedly ordered depositions, emails, exhibits and witness statements unsealed. Her rulings established that secrecy had to be specifically justified rather than automatically preserved simply because the case involved famous, wealthy or politically connected people.<br /><br />Those decisions got the transparency process moving and created a framework for the gradual release of records that had remained inaccessible for years. Preska continued reviewing objections from people identified in the documents, protecting survivors and sensitive personal information where necessary while refusing to allow embarrassment or reputational concerns alone to justify sealing. Her later orders resulted in additional releases, including the widely publicized unsealing of names and documents in January 2024. Through that sustained judicial review, Preska opened a substantial portion of the evidentiary record and gave the public a clearer view of Epstein and Maxwell’s network, the allegations against them and the information gathered during the Giuffre-Maxwell litigation.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2934</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Jeffrey Epstein's Survivor And Their Press Conference At Capitol Hill (7/19/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-s-survivor-and-their-press-conference-at-capitol-hill-7-19-26--73046126</link><description><![CDATA[At the Capitol press conference, Epstein survivors delivered a blunt, unified message: the federal government has failed them repeatedly, and symbolic gestures are no longer acceptable. Standing alongside advocates and lawmakers, survivors described years of being ignored, sidelined, and excluded from decisions that directly affected their lives and their cases. They spoke about the non-prosecution agreement, the secrecy surrounding it, and the continued refusal by the DOJ to fully acknowledge or remedy the harm caused by its own misconduct. The press conference was not framed as a plea for sympathy, but as a demand for accountability. Survivors emphasized that transparency laws and victims’ rights mean nothing if the DOJ can violate them without consequence. They made clear that Epstein’s death did not end the crimes, did not erase co-conspirators, and did not absolve the government of its duty to pursue the truth. The setting of the Capitol was deliberate, underscoring that this was not just a legal failure, but a systemic one that required congressional oversight and intervention.<br /><br />Several survivors used the moment to call out what they described as performative concern from federal officials, contrasting public statements about victim advocacy with years of private indifference. They criticized the DOJ for slow-walking disclosures, over-redacting files, and framing Epstein as a lone offender despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Family members and advocates stressed that justice delayed has functioned as justice denied, allowing powerful figures to escape scrutiny while survivors were forced to relive their trauma in courtrooms and press cycles. The press conference ended with clear demands: full enforcement of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act, independent oversight of the DOJ’s handling of Epstein-related matters, and a real commitment to pursuing anyone who enabled or participated in the abuse. The tone was resolute and unsparing. Survivors made it clear they were no longer asking to be heard. They were insisting that the government finally be held to the same standards it claims to enforce.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73046126</guid><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73046126/megasurvivorpressconference.mp3" length="35869719" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1496025f-2896-4a37-84e3-24d41a37da4d/1496025f-2896-4a37-84e3-24d41a37da4d.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1496025f-2896-4a37-84e3-24d41a37da4d/1496025f-2896-4a37-84e3-24d41a37da4d.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1496025f-2896-4a37-84e3-24d41a37da4d/1496025f-2896-4a37-84e3-24d41a37da4d.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>At the Capitol press conference, Epstein survivors delivered a blunt, unified message: the federal government has failed them repeatedly, and symbolic gestures are no longer acceptable. Standing alongside advocates and lawmakers, survivors described...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[At the Capitol press conference, Epstein survivors delivered a blunt, unified message: the federal government has failed them repeatedly, and symbolic gestures are no longer acceptable. Standing alongside advocates and lawmakers, survivors described years of being ignored, sidelined, and excluded from decisions that directly affected their lives and their cases. They spoke about the non-prosecution agreement, the secrecy surrounding it, and the continued refusal by the DOJ to fully acknowledge or remedy the harm caused by its own misconduct. The press conference was not framed as a plea for sympathy, but as a demand for accountability. Survivors emphasized that transparency laws and victims’ rights mean nothing if the DOJ can violate them without consequence. They made clear that Epstein’s death did not end the crimes, did not erase co-conspirators, and did not absolve the government of its duty to pursue the truth. The setting of the Capitol was deliberate, underscoring that this was not just a legal failure, but a systemic one that required congressional oversight and intervention.<br /><br />Several survivors used the moment to call out what they described as performative concern from federal officials, contrasting public statements about victim advocacy with years of private indifference. They criticized the DOJ for slow-walking disclosures, over-redacting files, and framing Epstein as a lone offender despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Family members and advocates stressed that justice delayed has functioned as justice denied, allowing powerful figures to escape scrutiny while survivors were forced to relive their trauma in courtrooms and press cycles. The press conference ended with clear demands: full enforcement of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act, independent oversight of the DOJ’s handling of Epstein-related matters, and a real commitment to pursuing anyone who enabled or participated in the abuse. The tone was resolute and unsparing. Survivors made it clear they were no longer asking to be heard. They were insisting that the government finally be held to the same standards it claims to enforce.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2242</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Jeffrey Epstein And The Sudden Onset Of Amnesia For Those Who Were Closest To him (7/19/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-the-sudden-onset-of-amnesia-for-those-who-were-closest-to-him-7-19-26--73046127</link><description><![CDATA[The great lie of the Epstein scandal isn’t just what he did, but how the powerful around him suddenly claimed they couldn’t remember him at all. Presidents, princes, billionaires, academics, bankers, and celebrities who once courted his money and shared his jets all reached for the same script when the walls closed in: I barely knew him. It was a coordinated act of survival, not an accident. Institutions like Harvard, MIT, Deutsche Bank, and JP Morgan played the same game, pretending they never saw the red flags. Legacy media, instead of hammering the contradictions, often published these denials straight, allowing amnesia to masquerade as truth. Forgetting became strategy, and strategy became cover.<br /><br /><br />But memory leaves evidence. Flight logs, photographs, donations, and testimonies remain, and every denial only underscores the complicity of those who looked away. The survivors don’t get to forget; they live with scars while the powerful rewrite history. What the amnesia act reveals is cowardice: a willingness to erase reality to protect reputation. Epstein built his empire on memory, yet his circle tried to survive through erasure. In the end, their denials brand them more deeply than their associations ever could—because the attempt to forget is itself proof they remembered perfectly well.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73046127</guid><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73046127/megaepsteinamnesia.mp3" length="24906231" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/fa6d139e-94cb-4a00-8c4f-35e9a261bf3c/fa6d139e-94cb-4a00-8c4f-35e9a261bf3c.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/fa6d139e-94cb-4a00-8c4f-35e9a261bf3c/fa6d139e-94cb-4a00-8c4f-35e9a261bf3c.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/fa6d139e-94cb-4a00-8c4f-35e9a261bf3c/fa6d139e-94cb-4a00-8c4f-35e9a261bf3c.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The great lie of the Epstein scandal isn’t just what he did, but how the powerful around him suddenly claimed they couldn’t remember him at all. Presidents, princes, billionaires, academics, bankers, and celebrities who once courted his money and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The great lie of the Epstein scandal isn’t just what he did, but how the powerful around him suddenly claimed they couldn’t remember him at all. Presidents, princes, billionaires, academics, bankers, and celebrities who once courted his money and shared his jets all reached for the same script when the walls closed in: I barely knew him. It was a coordinated act of survival, not an accident. Institutions like Harvard, MIT, Deutsche Bank, and JP Morgan played the same game, pretending they never saw the red flags. Legacy media, instead of hammering the contradictions, often published these denials straight, allowing amnesia to masquerade as truth. Forgetting became strategy, and strategy became cover.<br /><br /><br />But memory leaves evidence. Flight logs, photographs, donations, and testimonies remain, and every denial only underscores the complicity of those who looked away. The survivors don’t get to forget; they live with scars while the powerful rewrite history. What the amnesia act reveals is cowardice: a willingness to erase reality to protect reputation. Epstein built his empire on memory, yet his circle tried to survive through erasure. In the end, their denials brand them more deeply than their associations ever could—because the attempt to forget is itself proof they remembered perfectly well.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1557</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The Epstein Survivors Have Been Ignored For Over 3 Decades (7/19/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-epstein-survivors-have-been-ignored-for-over-3-decades-7-19-26--73045032</link><description><![CDATA[For more than three decades, survivors of Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse have come forward with warnings, allegations and firsthand accounts, only to be dismissed, doubted or pushed aside by institutions that should have protected them. Complaints reached law enforcement as early as the 1990s, and by the mid-2000s investigators in Palm Beach had assembled evidence showing that Epstein was systematically recruiting and abusing underage girls. Yet prosecutors granted him an extraordinarily lenient non-prosecution agreement, concealed the deal from survivors and allowed him to serve a short sentence under unusually favorable conditions. The message was unmistakable: the testimony of vulnerable girls carried less weight than the wealth, lawyers and connections surrounding Epstein.<br /><br />Even after Epstein’s 2008 conviction, survivors continued speaking publicly, filing lawsuits and demanding accountability while many powerful people and institutions treated the scandal as an inconvenience to be managed. Banks, universities, social circles, government agencies and members of the media continued associating with Epstein or failed to examine how his operation had been enabled. It took years of persistent reporting and survivor advocacy before federal authorities arrested him again in 2019, and his death prevented a full criminal trial that might have exposed more of the network around him. The survivors were not silent, and the warning signs were not hidden. They were ignored because too many people decided that protecting reputations, relationships and institutions mattered more than listening to the women and girls telling the truth.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73045032</guid><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73045032/megaepsteinsurvivorshavecomeforwardfor3decades.mp3" length="47780719" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c4d8a3c7-565b-4f61-8b13-c58086be2f05/c4d8a3c7-565b-4f61-8b13-c58086be2f05.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c4d8a3c7-565b-4f61-8b13-c58086be2f05/c4d8a3c7-565b-4f61-8b13-c58086be2f05.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c4d8a3c7-565b-4f61-8b13-c58086be2f05/c4d8a3c7-565b-4f61-8b13-c58086be2f05.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>For more than three decades, survivors of Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse have come forward with warnings, allegations and firsthand accounts, only to be dismissed, doubted or pushed aside by institutions that should have protected them. Complaints reached...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[For more than three decades, survivors of Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse have come forward with warnings, allegations and firsthand accounts, only to be dismissed, doubted or pushed aside by institutions that should have protected them. Complaints reached law enforcement as early as the 1990s, and by the mid-2000s investigators in Palm Beach had assembled evidence showing that Epstein was systematically recruiting and abusing underage girls. Yet prosecutors granted him an extraordinarily lenient non-prosecution agreement, concealed the deal from survivors and allowed him to serve a short sentence under unusually favorable conditions. The message was unmistakable: the testimony of vulnerable girls carried less weight than the wealth, lawyers and connections surrounding Epstein.<br /><br />Even after Epstein’s 2008 conviction, survivors continued speaking publicly, filing lawsuits and demanding accountability while many powerful people and institutions treated the scandal as an inconvenience to be managed. Banks, universities, social circles, government agencies and members of the media continued associating with Epstein or failed to examine how his operation had been enabled. It took years of persistent reporting and survivor advocacy before federal authorities arrested him again in 2019, and his death prevented a full criminal trial that might have exposed more of the network around him. The survivors were not silent, and the warning signs were not hidden. They were ignored because too many people decided that protecting reputations, relationships and institutions mattered more than listening to the women and girls telling the truth.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2987</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Ghislaine Maxwell 2019 SDNY Grand Jury Transcript (Part 4)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-ghislaine-maxwell-2019-sdny-grand-jury-transcript-part-4--73035504</link><description><![CDATA[The newly unsealed New York grand jury materials related to Ghislaine Maxwell provide a clearer window into how federal prosecutors built the case that ultimately led to her conviction. The documents outline the scope of witness testimony, evidentiary focus, and investigative priorities considered by the grand jury, reinforcing that Maxwell was not viewed as a peripheral figure but as a central facilitator within Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking operation. While much of the material aligns with facts already established at trial—including patterns of recruitment, grooming, and abuse—the unsealing confirms that prosecutors presented a structured, victim-centered narrative to the grand jury well before Maxwell’s arrest, countering claims that the case was rushed or politically motivated.<br /><br />At the same time, the documents have drawn attention for what they do not contain. The grand jury materials remain narrowly focused on Maxwell’s conduct and charges, offering little insight into why broader conspiracy cases against other Epstein associates were never pursued in New York. This has fueled renewed scrutiny of prosecutorial discretion and investigative limits, as the records show a deliberate effort to secure Maxwell’s indictment while leaving larger questions about Epstein’s network unresolved. For critics and survivors alike, the unsealing represents both a measure of long-delayed transparency and a reminder of how much of the Epstein story remains outside the bounds of criminal accountability.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73035504</guid><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73035504/nypddetectivemaxwellgrandjury4.mp3" length="12234545" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f8e6c96b-e006-440a-b81d-cdc3105ea70e/f8e6c96b-e006-440a-b81d-cdc3105ea70e.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f8e6c96b-e006-440a-b81d-cdc3105ea70e/f8e6c96b-e006-440a-b81d-cdc3105ea70e.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f8e6c96b-e006-440a-b81d-cdc3105ea70e/f8e6c96b-e006-440a-b81d-cdc3105ea70e.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The newly unsealed New York grand jury materials related to Ghislaine Maxwell provide a clearer window into how federal prosecutors built the case that ultimately led to her conviction. The documents outline the scope of witness testimony, evidentiary...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The newly unsealed New York grand jury materials related to Ghislaine Maxwell provide a clearer window into how federal prosecutors built the case that ultimately led to her conviction. The documents outline the scope of witness testimony, evidentiary focus, and investigative priorities considered by the grand jury, reinforcing that Maxwell was not viewed as a peripheral figure but as a central facilitator within Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking operation. While much of the material aligns with facts already established at trial—including patterns of recruitment, grooming, and abuse—the unsealing confirms that prosecutors presented a structured, victim-centered narrative to the grand jury well before Maxwell’s arrest, countering claims that the case was rushed or politically motivated.<br /><br />At the same time, the documents have drawn attention for what they do not contain. The grand jury materials remain narrowly focused on Maxwell’s conduct and charges, offering little insight into why broader conspiracy cases against other Epstein associates were never pursued in New York. This has fueled renewed scrutiny of prosecutorial discretion and investigative limits, as the records show a deliberate effort to secure Maxwell’s indictment while leaving larger questions about Epstein’s network unresolved. For critics and survivors alike, the unsealing represents both a measure of long-delayed transparency and a reminder of how much of the Epstein story remains outside the bounds of criminal accountability.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>765</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Ghislaine Maxwell 2019 SDNY Grand Jury Transcript (Part 3)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-ghislaine-maxwell-2019-sdny-grand-jury-transcript-part-3--73035508</link><description><![CDATA[The newly unsealed New York grand jury materials related to Ghislaine Maxwell provide a clearer window into how federal prosecutors built the case that ultimately led to her conviction. The documents outline the scope of witness testimony, evidentiary focus, and investigative priorities considered by the grand jury, reinforcing that Maxwell was not viewed as a peripheral figure but as a central facilitator within Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking operation. While much of the material aligns with facts already established at trial—including patterns of recruitment, grooming, and abuse—the unsealing confirms that prosecutors presented a structured, victim-centered narrative to the grand jury well before Maxwell’s arrest, countering claims that the case was rushed or politically motivated.<br /><br />At the same time, the documents have drawn attention for what they do not contain. The grand jury materials remain narrowly focused on Maxwell’s conduct and charges, offering little insight into why broader conspiracy cases against other Epstein associates were never pursued in New York. This has fueled renewed scrutiny of prosecutorial discretion and investigative limits, as the records show a deliberate effort to secure Maxwell’s indictment while leaving larger questions about Epstein’s network unresolved. For critics and survivors alike, the unsealing represents both a measure of long-delayed transparency and a reminder of how much of the Epstein story remains outside the bounds of criminal accountability.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73035508</guid><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73035508/nypddetectivemaxwellgrandjury3.mp3" length="11582946" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d24a6d77-4ac5-4944-879d-6a86b39d206c/d24a6d77-4ac5-4944-879d-6a86b39d206c.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d24a6d77-4ac5-4944-879d-6a86b39d206c/d24a6d77-4ac5-4944-879d-6a86b39d206c.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d24a6d77-4ac5-4944-879d-6a86b39d206c/d24a6d77-4ac5-4944-879d-6a86b39d206c.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The newly unsealed New York grand jury materials related to Ghislaine Maxwell provide a clearer window into how federal prosecutors built the case that ultimately led to her conviction. The documents outline the scope of witness testimony, evidentiary...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The newly unsealed New York grand jury materials related to Ghislaine Maxwell provide a clearer window into how federal prosecutors built the case that ultimately led to her conviction. The documents outline the scope of witness testimony, evidentiary focus, and investigative priorities considered by the grand jury, reinforcing that Maxwell was not viewed as a peripheral figure but as a central facilitator within Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking operation. While much of the material aligns with facts already established at trial—including patterns of recruitment, grooming, and abuse—the unsealing confirms that prosecutors presented a structured, victim-centered narrative to the grand jury well before Maxwell’s arrest, countering claims that the case was rushed or politically motivated.<br /><br />At the same time, the documents have drawn attention for what they do not contain. The grand jury materials remain narrowly focused on Maxwell’s conduct and charges, offering little insight into why broader conspiracy cases against other Epstein associates were never pursued in New York. This has fueled renewed scrutiny of prosecutorial discretion and investigative limits, as the records show a deliberate effort to secure Maxwell’s indictment while leaving larger questions about Epstein’s network unresolved. For critics and survivors alike, the unsealing represents both a measure of long-delayed transparency and a reminder of how much of the Epstein story remains outside the bounds of criminal accountability.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>724</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Ghislaine Maxwell 2019 SDNY Grand Jury Transcript (Part 2)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-ghislaine-maxwell-2019-sdny-grand-jury-transcript-part-2--73035505</link><description><![CDATA[The newly unsealed New York grand jury materials related to Ghislaine Maxwell provide a clearer window into how federal prosecutors built the case that ultimately led to her conviction. The documents outline the scope of witness testimony, evidentiary focus, and investigative priorities considered by the grand jury, reinforcing that Maxwell was not viewed as a peripheral figure but as a central facilitator within Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking operation. While much of the material aligns with facts already established at trial—including patterns of recruitment, grooming, and abuse—the unsealing confirms that prosecutors presented a structured, victim-centered narrative to the grand jury well before Maxwell’s arrest, countering claims that the case was rushed or politically motivated.<br /><br />At the same time, the documents have drawn attention for what they do not contain. The grand jury materials remain narrowly focused on Maxwell’s conduct and charges, offering little insight into why broader conspiracy cases against other Epstein associates were never pursued in New York. This has fueled renewed scrutiny of prosecutorial discretion and investigative limits, as the records show a deliberate effort to secure Maxwell’s indictment while leaving larger questions about Epstein’s network unresolved. For critics and survivors alike, the unsealing represents both a measure of long-delayed transparency and a reminder of how much of the Epstein story remains outside the bounds of criminal accountability.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73035505</guid><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73035505/nypddetectivemaxgrandjury2.mp3" length="10892478" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ddecf01f-3dc4-4e1a-ac5d-e6214492d28f/ddecf01f-3dc4-4e1a-ac5d-e6214492d28f.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ddecf01f-3dc4-4e1a-ac5d-e6214492d28f/ddecf01f-3dc4-4e1a-ac5d-e6214492d28f.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ddecf01f-3dc4-4e1a-ac5d-e6214492d28f/ddecf01f-3dc4-4e1a-ac5d-e6214492d28f.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The newly unsealed New York grand jury materials related to Ghislaine Maxwell provide a clearer window into how federal prosecutors built the case that ultimately led to her conviction. The documents outline the scope of witness testimony, evidentiary...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The newly unsealed New York grand jury materials related to Ghislaine Maxwell provide a clearer window into how federal prosecutors built the case that ultimately led to her conviction. The documents outline the scope of witness testimony, evidentiary focus, and investigative priorities considered by the grand jury, reinforcing that Maxwell was not viewed as a peripheral figure but as a central facilitator within Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking operation. While much of the material aligns with facts already established at trial—including patterns of recruitment, grooming, and abuse—the unsealing confirms that prosecutors presented a structured, victim-centered narrative to the grand jury well before Maxwell’s arrest, countering claims that the case was rushed or politically motivated.<br /><br />At the same time, the documents have drawn attention for what they do not contain. The grand jury materials remain narrowly focused on Maxwell’s conduct and charges, offering little insight into why broader conspiracy cases against other Epstein associates were never pursued in New York. This has fueled renewed scrutiny of prosecutorial discretion and investigative limits, as the records show a deliberate effort to secure Maxwell’s indictment while leaving larger questions about Epstein’s network unresolved. For critics and survivors alike, the unsealing represents both a measure of long-delayed transparency and a reminder of how much of the Epstein story remains outside the bounds of criminal accountability.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>681</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Ghislaine Maxwell 2019 SDNY Grand Jury Transcript (Part 1)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-ghislaine-maxwell-2019-sdny-grand-jury-transcript-part-1--73035509</link><description><![CDATA[The newly unsealed New York grand jury materials related to Ghislaine Maxwell provide a clearer window into how federal prosecutors built the case that ultimately led to her conviction. The documents outline the scope of witness testimony, evidentiary focus, and investigative priorities considered by the grand jury, reinforcing that Maxwell was not viewed as a peripheral figure but as a central facilitator within Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking operation. While much of the material aligns with facts already established at trial—including patterns of recruitment, grooming, and abuse—the unsealing confirms that prosecutors presented a structured, victim-centered narrative to the grand jury well before Maxwell’s arrest, countering claims that the case was rushed or politically motivated.<br /><br />At the same time, the documents have drawn attention for what they do not contain. The grand jury materials remain narrowly focused on Maxwell’s conduct and charges, offering little insight into why broader conspiracy cases against other Epstein associates were never pursued in New York. This has fueled renewed scrutiny of prosecutorial discretion and investigative limits, as the records show a deliberate effort to secure Maxwell’s indictment while leaving larger questions about Epstein’s network unresolved. For critics and survivors alike, the unsealing represents both a measure of long-delayed transparency and a reminder of how much of the Epstein story remains outside the bounds of criminal accountability.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73035509</guid><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73035509/nypddetectivemaxgrandjury1.mp3" length="13349242" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/82cded28-d1c2-4892-855d-94a8630b7318/82cded28-d1c2-4892-855d-94a8630b7318.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/82cded28-d1c2-4892-855d-94a8630b7318/82cded28-d1c2-4892-855d-94a8630b7318.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/82cded28-d1c2-4892-855d-94a8630b7318/82cded28-d1c2-4892-855d-94a8630b7318.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The newly unsealed New York grand jury materials related to Ghislaine Maxwell provide a clearer window into how federal prosecutors built the case that ultimately led to her conviction. The documents outline the scope of witness testimony, evidentiary...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The newly unsealed New York grand jury materials related to Ghislaine Maxwell provide a clearer window into how federal prosecutors built the case that ultimately led to her conviction. The documents outline the scope of witness testimony, evidentiary focus, and investigative priorities considered by the grand jury, reinforcing that Maxwell was not viewed as a peripheral figure but as a central facilitator within Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking operation. While much of the material aligns with facts already established at trial—including patterns of recruitment, grooming, and abuse—the unsealing confirms that prosecutors presented a structured, victim-centered narrative to the grand jury well before Maxwell’s arrest, countering claims that the case was rushed or politically motivated.<br /><br />At the same time, the documents have drawn attention for what they do not contain. The grand jury materials remain narrowly focused on Maxwell’s conduct and charges, offering little insight into why broader conspiracy cases against other Epstein associates were never pursued in New York. This has fueled renewed scrutiny of prosecutorial discretion and investigative limits, as the records show a deliberate effort to secure Maxwell’s indictment while leaving larger questions about Epstein’s network unresolved. For critics and survivors alike, the unsealing represents both a measure of long-delayed transparency and a reminder of how much of the Epstein story remains outside the bounds of criminal accountability.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>835</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Lesley Groff And The Transcript From Her Epstein Related Trip to Congress (Part 15) (7/18/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/lesley-groff-and-the-transcript-from-her-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-15-7-18-26--73045253</link><description><![CDATA[Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her central position was that Epstein kept her separated from his criminal life, that she never witnessed abuse, never had a victim disclose abuse to her, and did not knowingly help Epstein or Maxwell commit crimes. She described Epstein as a “master manipulator” who lied to her and kept his “legitimate” world apart from his abuse, while acknowledging that she scheduled massage appointments when Epstein provided names and numbers, sometimes circulated calendars that included those appointments early on, and understood the massages as routine at the time. She said she did not personally meet the massage providers, did not know they were minors or young women, and assumed they were masseuses, even though members pressed her on why an extremely wealthy man would use rotating names and phone numbers instead of a professional massage service.<br /><br />The questioning also focused heavily on Epstein’s network and whether Groff had knowledge of powerful men being provided access to girls or young women through Epstein or Maxwell. Groff repeatedly answered no when asked whether she had arranged massages for prominent figures, knew of sexual activity involving minors or young women, or knew of anyone who knowingly facilitated Epstein’s crimes. She acknowledged scheduling or connecting Epstein with high-profile contacts, including Prince Andrew, Ehud Barak, Larry Summers, George Mitchell, John Kerry, Wesley Clark, Bill Clinton-related circles, and Donald Trump phone calls, but denied arranging Trump travel during her employment and denied knowledge of Trump-related law enforcement communications. She also said she never suspected Epstein or Maxwell of working with any intelligence service. Overall, Groff’s testimony was defensive and narrow: she admitted to being part of the machinery that kept Epstein’s calendar and contacts moving, but insisted she never saw the criminal operation underneath it and never knowingly enabled it.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:  <br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73045253</guid><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73045253/1c0b4f6d_2f3d_4873_adfe_266fe7819d11.mp3" length="15041977" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/609f3b45-74b9-49b3-af4a-eb320ab1adea/609f3b45-74b9-49b3-af4a-eb320ab1adea.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/609f3b45-74b9-49b3-af4a-eb320ab1adea/609f3b45-74b9-49b3-af4a-eb320ab1adea.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/609f3b45-74b9-49b3-af4a-eb320ab1adea/609f3b45-74b9-49b3-af4a-eb320ab1adea.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her central position was that Epstein kept her separated from his criminal life, that she never witnessed abuse, never had a victim disclose abuse to her, and did not knowingly help Epstein or Maxwell commit crimes. She described Epstein as a “master manipulator” who lied to her and kept his “legitimate” world apart from his abuse, while acknowledging that she scheduled massage appointments when Epstein provided names and numbers, sometimes circulated calendars that included those appointments early on, and understood the massages as routine at the time. She said she did not personally meet the massage providers, did not know they were minors or young women, and assumed they were masseuses, even though members pressed her on why an extremely wealthy man would use rotating names and phone numbers instead of a professional massage service.<br /><br />The questioning also focused heavily on Epstein’s network and whether Groff had knowledge of powerful men being provided access to girls or young women through Epstein or Maxwell. Groff repeatedly answered no when asked whether she had arranged massages for prominent figures, knew of sexual activity involving minors or young women, or knew of anyone who knowingly facilitated Epstein’s crimes. She acknowledged scheduling or connecting Epstein with high-profile contacts, including Prince Andrew, Ehud Barak, Larry Summers, George Mitchell, John Kerry, Wesley Clark, Bill Clinton-related circles, and Donald Trump phone calls, but denied arranging Trump travel during her employment and denied knowledge of Trump-related law enforcement communications. She also said she never suspected Epstein or Maxwell of working with any intelligence service. Overall, Groff’s testimony was defensive and narrow: she admitted to being part of the machinery that kept Epstein’s calendar and contacts moving, but insisted she never saw the criminal operation underneath it and never knowingly enabled it.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:  <br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>941</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Lesley Groff And The Transcript From Her Epstein Related Trip to Congress (Part 14) (7/18/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/lesley-groff-and-the-transcript-from-her-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-14-7-18-26--73045252</link><description><![CDATA[Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her central position was that Epstein kept her separated from his criminal life, that she never witnessed abuse, never had a victim disclose abuse to her, and did not knowingly help Epstein or Maxwell commit crimes. She described Epstein as a “master manipulator” who lied to her and kept his “legitimate” world apart from his abuse, while acknowledging that she scheduled massage appointments when Epstein provided names and numbers, sometimes circulated calendars that included those appointments early on, and understood the massages as routine at the time. She said she did not personally meet the massage providers, did not know they were minors or young women, and assumed they were masseuses, even though members pressed her on why an extremely wealthy man would use rotating names and phone numbers instead of a professional massage service.<br /><br />The questioning also focused heavily on Epstein’s network and whether Groff had knowledge of powerful men being provided access to girls or young women through Epstein or Maxwell. Groff repeatedly answered no when asked whether she had arranged massages for prominent figures, knew of sexual activity involving minors or young women, or knew of anyone who knowingly facilitated Epstein’s crimes. She acknowledged scheduling or connecting Epstein with high-profile contacts, including Prince Andrew, Ehud Barak, Larry Summers, George Mitchell, John Kerry, Wesley Clark, Bill Clinton-related circles, and Donald Trump phone calls, but denied arranging Trump travel during her employment and denied knowledge of Trump-related law enforcement communications. She also said she never suspected Epstein or Maxwell of working with any intelligence service. Overall, Groff’s testimony was defensive and narrow: she admitted to being part of the machinery that kept Epstein’s calendar and contacts moving, but insisted she never saw the criminal operation underneath it and never knowingly enabled it.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:  <br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73045252</guid><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 18:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73045252/a874b515_70e1_4fac_8ba1_a104dfc57c42.mp3" length="11984605" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/11e66a55-bc37-4abc-9dec-e76dfbc2905e/11e66a55-bc37-4abc-9dec-e76dfbc2905e.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/11e66a55-bc37-4abc-9dec-e76dfbc2905e/11e66a55-bc37-4abc-9dec-e76dfbc2905e.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/11e66a55-bc37-4abc-9dec-e76dfbc2905e/11e66a55-bc37-4abc-9dec-e76dfbc2905e.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her central position was that Epstein kept her separated from his criminal life, that she never witnessed abuse, never had a victim disclose abuse to her, and did not knowingly help Epstein or Maxwell commit crimes. She described Epstein as a “master manipulator” who lied to her and kept his “legitimate” world apart from his abuse, while acknowledging that she scheduled massage appointments when Epstein provided names and numbers, sometimes circulated calendars that included those appointments early on, and understood the massages as routine at the time. She said she did not personally meet the massage providers, did not know they were minors or young women, and assumed they were masseuses, even though members pressed her on why an extremely wealthy man would use rotating names and phone numbers instead of a professional massage service.<br /><br />The questioning also focused heavily on Epstein’s network and whether Groff had knowledge of powerful men being provided access to girls or young women through Epstein or Maxwell. Groff repeatedly answered no when asked whether she had arranged massages for prominent figures, knew of sexual activity involving minors or young women, or knew of anyone who knowingly facilitated Epstein’s crimes. She acknowledged scheduling or connecting Epstein with high-profile contacts, including Prince Andrew, Ehud Barak, Larry Summers, George Mitchell, John Kerry, Wesley Clark, Bill Clinton-related circles, and Donald Trump phone calls, but denied arranging Trump travel during her employment and denied knowledge of Trump-related law enforcement communications. She also said she never suspected Epstein or Maxwell of working with any intelligence service. Overall, Groff’s testimony was defensive and narrow: she admitted to being part of the machinery that kept Epstein’s calendar and contacts moving, but insisted she never saw the criminal operation underneath it and never knowingly enabled it.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:  <br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>750</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Lesley Groff And The Transcript From Her Epstein Related Trip to Congress (Part 13) (7/18/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/lesley-groff-and-the-transcript-from-her-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-13-7-18-26--73045258</link><description><![CDATA[Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her central position was that Epstein kept her separated from his criminal life, that she never witnessed abuse, never had a victim disclose abuse to her, and did not knowingly help Epstein or Maxwell commit crimes. She described Epstein as a “master manipulator” who lied to her and kept his “legitimate” world apart from his abuse, while acknowledging that she scheduled massage appointments when Epstein provided names and numbers, sometimes circulated calendars that included those appointments early on, and understood the massages as routine at the time. She said she did not personally meet the massage providers, did not know they were minors or young women, and assumed they were masseuses, even though members pressed her on why an extremely wealthy man would use rotating names and phone numbers instead of a professional massage service.<br /><br />The questioning also focused heavily on Epstein’s network and whether Groff had knowledge of powerful men being provided access to girls or young women through Epstein or Maxwell. Groff repeatedly answered no when asked whether she had arranged massages for prominent figures, knew of sexual activity involving minors or young women, or knew of anyone who knowingly facilitated Epstein’s crimes. She acknowledged scheduling or connecting Epstein with high-profile contacts, including Prince Andrew, Ehud Barak, Larry Summers, George Mitchell, John Kerry, Wesley Clark, Bill Clinton-related circles, and Donald Trump phone calls, but denied arranging Trump travel during her employment and denied knowledge of Trump-related law enforcement communications. She also said she never suspected Epstein or Maxwell of working with any intelligence service. Overall, Groff’s testimony was defensive and narrow: she admitted to being part of the machinery that kept Epstein’s calendar and contacts moving, but insisted she never saw the criminal operation underneath it and never knowingly enabled it.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:  <br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73045258</guid><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 16:27:06 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73045258/grofftranscript13.mp3" length="12407580" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/910b6a52-a9c7-4ccf-a8be-3277d37bfe8c/910b6a52-a9c7-4ccf-a8be-3277d37bfe8c.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/910b6a52-a9c7-4ccf-a8be-3277d37bfe8c/910b6a52-a9c7-4ccf-a8be-3277d37bfe8c.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/910b6a52-a9c7-4ccf-a8be-3277d37bfe8c/910b6a52-a9c7-4ccf-a8be-3277d37bfe8c.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her central position was that Epstein kept her separated from his criminal life, that she never witnessed abuse, never had a victim disclose abuse to her, and did not knowingly help Epstein or Maxwell commit crimes. She described Epstein as a “master manipulator” who lied to her and kept his “legitimate” world apart from his abuse, while acknowledging that she scheduled massage appointments when Epstein provided names and numbers, sometimes circulated calendars that included those appointments early on, and understood the massages as routine at the time. She said she did not personally meet the massage providers, did not know they were minors or young women, and assumed they were masseuses, even though members pressed her on why an extremely wealthy man would use rotating names and phone numbers instead of a professional massage service.<br /><br />The questioning also focused heavily on Epstein’s network and whether Groff had knowledge of powerful men being provided access to girls or young women through Epstein or Maxwell. Groff repeatedly answered no when asked whether she had arranged massages for prominent figures, knew of sexual activity involving minors or young women, or knew of anyone who knowingly facilitated Epstein’s crimes. She acknowledged scheduling or connecting Epstein with high-profile contacts, including Prince Andrew, Ehud Barak, Larry Summers, George Mitchell, John Kerry, Wesley Clark, Bill Clinton-related circles, and Donald Trump phone calls, but denied arranging Trump travel during her employment and denied knowledge of Trump-related law enforcement communications. She also said she never suspected Epstein or Maxwell of working with any intelligence service. Overall, Groff’s testimony was defensive and narrow: she admitted to being part of the machinery that kept Epstein’s calendar and contacts moving, but insisted she never saw the criminal operation underneath it and never knowingly enabled it.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:  <br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>776</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Ghislaine Maxwell And Her Life After Conviction (7/18/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-ghislaine-maxwell-and-her-life-after-conviction-7-18-26--73035208</link><description><![CDATA[In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.<br /><br />Giuffre’s deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell’s direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein’s residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein’s private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell’s London townhouse, and at Epstein’s New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell’s role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell’s 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me;<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.appealslawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/1090-32.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1090-32.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73035208</guid><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73035208/megamaxnewlifeafterconviction.mp3" length="48487518" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f4393659-be62-4036-834e-4f61a886c659/f4393659-be62-4036-834e-4f61a886c659.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f4393659-be62-4036-834e-4f61a886c659/f4393659-be62-4036-834e-4f61a886c659.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f4393659-be62-4036-834e-4f61a886c659/f4393659-be62-4036-834e-4f61a886c659.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.<br /><br />Giuffre’s deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell’s direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein’s residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein’s private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell’s London townhouse, and at Epstein’s New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell’s role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell’s 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me;<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.appealslawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/1090-32.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1090-32.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3031</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Todd Blanche And The Mechanics Of The Epstein Coverup (7/18/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-todd-blanche-and-the-mechanics-of-the-epstein-coverup-7-18-26--73035207</link><description><![CDATA[Todd Blanche has become an integral figure in what critics describe as the continuing institutional coverup of Jeffrey Epstein because he has repeatedly used the authority of the Justice Department to control what the public sees, limit meaningful scrutiny and defend a disclosure process riddled with omissions, damaging mistakes and unanswered questions. He personally interviewed Ghislaine Maxwell behind closed doors, participated in the department’s heavily criticized handling of millions of Epstein-related records and defended releases that exposed identifying information about survivors while still withholding or redacting material connected to powerful people. Under his leadership, the Justice Department has resisted demands for broader disclosure, fought litigation seeking additional records and insisted that it has found no solid evidence that Epstein trafficked victims to other men, even though Blanche has acknowledged that other participants existed. The result has been a process that appears far more focused on managing political fallout and controlling the narrative than aggressively following every remaining lead. Epstein survivors have condemned Blanche’s role, arguing that senior officials treated the scandal as a reputational crisis instead of an unfinished criminal investigation.<br /><br />Blanche’s significance is not simply that he inherited a broken system, but that he repeatedly chose to defend and preserve it. He has minimized the department’s failures, resisted committing himself to personally meeting with survivors and asked the public to trust conclusions reached through a process that has remained secretive, inconsistent and largely insulated from independent examination. Even when Congress, courts, journalists and survivors demanded clearer answers, Blanche’s Justice Department continued to determine unilaterally which records would be released, how extensively they would be redacted and what investigative conclusions the public was expected to accept. That does not by itself prove that Blanche is concealing a specific criminal act or protecting a particular individual, but it explains why he has become central to allegations of a coverup. By obstructing transparency, shielding the department’s internal decision-making and presenting disputed conclusions as though the Epstein matter has been thoroughly resolved, Blanche has helped perpetuate the same culture of secrecy and institutional self-protection that allowed Epstein and his associates to evade full accountability for decades.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protommail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73035207</guid><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73035207/megablancheandthecoverup.mp3" length="44675701" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b216bf54-17c6-4b94-b958-6a67b1131615/b216bf54-17c6-4b94-b958-6a67b1131615.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b216bf54-17c6-4b94-b958-6a67b1131615/b216bf54-17c6-4b94-b958-6a67b1131615.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b216bf54-17c6-4b94-b958-6a67b1131615/b216bf54-17c6-4b94-b958-6a67b1131615.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Todd Blanche has become an integral figure in what critics describe as the continuing institutional coverup of Jeffrey Epstein because he has repeatedly used the authority of the Justice Department to control what the public sees, limit meaningful...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Todd Blanche has become an integral figure in what critics describe as the continuing institutional coverup of Jeffrey Epstein because he has repeatedly used the authority of the Justice Department to control what the public sees, limit meaningful scrutiny and defend a disclosure process riddled with omissions, damaging mistakes and unanswered questions. He personally interviewed Ghislaine Maxwell behind closed doors, participated in the department’s heavily criticized handling of millions of Epstein-related records and defended releases that exposed identifying information about survivors while still withholding or redacting material connected to powerful people. Under his leadership, the Justice Department has resisted demands for broader disclosure, fought litigation seeking additional records and insisted that it has found no solid evidence that Epstein trafficked victims to other men, even though Blanche has acknowledged that other participants existed. The result has been a process that appears far more focused on managing political fallout and controlling the narrative than aggressively following every remaining lead. Epstein survivors have condemned Blanche’s role, arguing that senior officials treated the scandal as a reputational crisis instead of an unfinished criminal investigation.<br /><br />Blanche’s significance is not simply that he inherited a broken system, but that he repeatedly chose to defend and preserve it. He has minimized the department’s failures, resisted committing himself to personally meeting with survivors and asked the public to trust conclusions reached through a process that has remained secretive, inconsistent and largely insulated from independent examination. Even when Congress, courts, journalists and survivors demanded clearer answers, Blanche’s Justice Department continued to determine unilaterally which records would be released, how extensively they would be redacted and what investigative conclusions the public was expected to accept. That does not by itself prove that Blanche is concealing a specific criminal act or protecting a particular individual, but it explains why he has become central to allegations of a coverup. By obstructing transparency, shielding the department’s internal decision-making and presenting disputed conclusions as though the Epstein matter has been thoroughly resolved, Blanche has helped perpetuate the same culture of secrecy and institutional self-protection that allowed Epstein and his associates to evade full accountability for decades.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protommail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2793</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Prince Andrew Plans A Comeback But His Brother The King Has Other Plans (7/17/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-prince-andrew-plans-a-comeback-but-his-brother-the-king-has-other-plans-7-17-26--73035201</link><description><![CDATA[Prince Andrew repeatedly attempted to rebuild his public position after stepping away from royal duties in 2019, but those efforts were firmly resisted by his older brother Charles while he was still Prince of Wales. Andrew reportedly viewed appearances at Prince Philip’s memorial service, the Order of the Garter ceremony and Queen Elizabeth II’s Platinum Jubilee as opportunities to demonstrate that he remained part of the monarchy’s public life. Charles, supported by Prince William, believed that allowing Andrew to return in any meaningful capacity would reopen the Epstein scandal and further damage the institution. Andrew was ultimately prevented from participating publicly in the Order of the Garter procession in June 2022, despite retaining membership in the order, and his wider hopes of resuming official duties went nowhere. By that point, he had already lost his military affiliations, royal patronages and permission to use the style “His Royal Highness” in an official capacity.<br /><br />After Queen Elizabeth’s death and Charles’s accession to the throne in September 2022, the barrier standing between Andrew and a comeback became even stronger. As king, Charles continued to permit his brother to attend certain private family gatherings and ceremonial occasions, but he refused to restore Andrew as a working royal or give him an official public platform. The distinction was deliberate: Andrew could remain a member of the family, but he would not again represent the Crown. Charles understood that every attempted rehabilitation risked making the monarchy appear indifferent to the allegations surrounding Andrew’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and the civil lawsuit brought by Virginia Giuffre, which Andrew settled in 2022 without admitting liability. Andrew’s strategy depended heavily on the protection and affection of his mother, but once Charles became king, that avenue effectively closed, leaving his repeated comeback campaigns blocked by the same brother who had opposed them while waiting for the throne.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73035201</guid><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73035201/megaandrewcomebackplanscharleshisownplan.mp3" length="46019052" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e24d1ff0-69a0-4175-a79a-6f8a961e196e/e24d1ff0-69a0-4175-a79a-6f8a961e196e.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e24d1ff0-69a0-4175-a79a-6f8a961e196e/e24d1ff0-69a0-4175-a79a-6f8a961e196e.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e24d1ff0-69a0-4175-a79a-6f8a961e196e/e24d1ff0-69a0-4175-a79a-6f8a961e196e.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Prince Andrew repeatedly attempted to rebuild his public position after stepping away from royal duties in 2019, but those efforts were firmly resisted by his older brother Charles while he was still Prince of Wales. Andrew reportedly viewed...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Prince Andrew repeatedly attempted to rebuild his public position after stepping away from royal duties in 2019, but those efforts were firmly resisted by his older brother Charles while he was still Prince of Wales. Andrew reportedly viewed appearances at Prince Philip’s memorial service, the Order of the Garter ceremony and Queen Elizabeth II’s Platinum Jubilee as opportunities to demonstrate that he remained part of the monarchy’s public life. Charles, supported by Prince William, believed that allowing Andrew to return in any meaningful capacity would reopen the Epstein scandal and further damage the institution. Andrew was ultimately prevented from participating publicly in the Order of the Garter procession in June 2022, despite retaining membership in the order, and his wider hopes of resuming official duties went nowhere. By that point, he had already lost his military affiliations, royal patronages and permission to use the style “His Royal Highness” in an official capacity.<br /><br />After Queen Elizabeth’s death and Charles’s accession to the throne in September 2022, the barrier standing between Andrew and a comeback became even stronger. As king, Charles continued to permit his brother to attend certain private family gatherings and ceremonial occasions, but he refused to restore Andrew as a working royal or give him an official public platform. The distinction was deliberate: Andrew could remain a member of the family, but he would not again represent the Crown. Charles understood that every attempted rehabilitation risked making the monarchy appear indifferent to the allegations surrounding Andrew’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and the civil lawsuit brought by Virginia Giuffre, which Andrew settled in 2022 without admitting liability. Andrew’s strategy depended heavily on the protection and affection of his mother, but once Charles became king, that avenue effectively closed, leaving his repeated comeback campaigns blocked by the same brother who had opposed them while waiting for the throne.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2877</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Judge Kaplan Blasts Prince Andrew And His Legal Team (7/18/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-judge-kaplan-blasts-prince-andrew-and-his-legal-team-7-18-26--73035200</link><description><![CDATA[Judge Lewis Kaplan made it clear early in Virginia Giuffre’s civil lawsuit that he would not allow Prince Andrew’s attorneys to bury the case beneath procedural disputes or use technical arguments to postpone confronting the allegations. When Andrew’s legal team challenged whether he had been properly served with the lawsuit, Kaplan authorized Giuffre to deliver the papers through Andrew’s American attorneys and pushed the parties toward addressing the substance of the case. The judge indicated that the litigation should not be made unnecessarily complicated, rejecting the idea that disputes over international service rules should be permitted to stall the proceedings indefinitely. Andrew’s lawyers had argued that formal service had to proceed through British legal channels, while Giuffre’s attorneys accused the prince of avoiding service and playing a prolonged game of procedural hide-and-seek. Kaplan’s rulings removed that obstacle and established that Andrew would have to respond rather than continue contesting how the papers reached him.<br /><br />Kaplan showed the same impatience when Andrew’s attorneys later attempted to dismiss the lawsuit through a series of legal technicalities, including Giuffre’s residency, the constitutionality of New York’s Child Victims Act and the wording of her earlier settlement with Jeffrey Epstein. During oral arguments, Kaplan directly cut off claims that Giuffre had failed to include enough factual detail in her complaint, telling Andrew’s lawyer that she had no obligation to provide that level of specificity at the pleading stage and that dismissal on that basis was “not going to happen.” He ultimately denied Andrew’s motion to dismiss in all respects, finding that the Epstein settlement was too ambiguous to clearly release Andrew from liability and allowing discovery to proceed. The message was unmistakable: Andrew’s legal team was entitled to mount a defense, but procedure would not be transformed into a mechanism for endlessly delaying Giuffre’s opportunity to have her claims heard.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73035200</guid><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73035200/megajudgekaplanblastsandrew.mp3" length="38761608" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4ee57458-8d30-4b4c-b1bf-3b88ddf2040a/4ee57458-8d30-4b4c-b1bf-3b88ddf2040a.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4ee57458-8d30-4b4c-b1bf-3b88ddf2040a/4ee57458-8d30-4b4c-b1bf-3b88ddf2040a.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4ee57458-8d30-4b4c-b1bf-3b88ddf2040a/4ee57458-8d30-4b4c-b1bf-3b88ddf2040a.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Judge Lewis Kaplan made it clear early in Virginia Giuffre’s civil lawsuit that he would not allow Prince Andrew’s attorneys to bury the case beneath procedural disputes or use technical arguments to postpone confronting the allegations. When Andrew’s...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Judge Lewis Kaplan made it clear early in Virginia Giuffre’s civil lawsuit that he would not allow Prince Andrew’s attorneys to bury the case beneath procedural disputes or use technical arguments to postpone confronting the allegations. When Andrew’s legal team challenged whether he had been properly served with the lawsuit, Kaplan authorized Giuffre to deliver the papers through Andrew’s American attorneys and pushed the parties toward addressing the substance of the case. The judge indicated that the litigation should not be made unnecessarily complicated, rejecting the idea that disputes over international service rules should be permitted to stall the proceedings indefinitely. Andrew’s lawyers had argued that formal service had to proceed through British legal channels, while Giuffre’s attorneys accused the prince of avoiding service and playing a prolonged game of procedural hide-and-seek. Kaplan’s rulings removed that obstacle and established that Andrew would have to respond rather than continue contesting how the papers reached him.<br /><br />Kaplan showed the same impatience when Andrew’s attorneys later attempted to dismiss the lawsuit through a series of legal technicalities, including Giuffre’s residency, the constitutionality of New York’s Child Victims Act and the wording of her earlier settlement with Jeffrey Epstein. During oral arguments, Kaplan directly cut off claims that Giuffre had failed to include enough factual detail in her complaint, telling Andrew’s lawyer that she had no obligation to provide that level of specificity at the pleading stage and that dismissal on that basis was “not going to happen.” He ultimately denied Andrew’s motion to dismiss in all respects, finding that the Epstein settlement was too ambiguous to clearly release Andrew from liability and allowing discovery to proceed. The message was unmistakable: Andrew’s legal team was entitled to mount a defense, but procedure would not be transformed into a mechanism for endlessly delaying Giuffre’s opportunity to have her claims heard.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2423</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Jeffrey Epstein And His Rolodex Full Of Powerful Friends (7/17/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-his-rolodex-full-of-powerful-friends-7-17-26--73035199</link><description><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein’s relationships with Michael Wolff, Bill Clinton and Bill Gates differed in purpose and duration, but each demonstrates how Epstein sought access to influential people who could enhance his legitimacy. Wolff developed an unusually close source relationship with Epstein, conducting extensive interviews and exchanging emails with him over several years. Released correspondence suggested that Wolff sometimes moved beyond simply gathering information and offered Epstein advice about media strategy, particularly concerning Donald Trump and questions about Epstein’s past. Wolff has defended the contact as an aggressive journalistic effort to extract information from a uniquely knowledgeable source, but the tone of some exchanges raised questions about whether the relationship became too collaborative. Clinton’s connection to Epstein was more public and socially advantageous to Epstein. After Clinton left office, he traveled aboard Epstein’s aircraft on multiple international trips connected to humanitarian and Clinton Foundation work, accompanied by staff, supporters and, according to Clinton’s office, Secret Service personnel. Epstein also cultivated connections within Clinton’s political and philanthropic circle, while Clinton has maintained that he knew nothing about Epstein’s criminal conduct and ended contact years before Epstein’s 2019 arrest.<br /><br /><br />Epstein’s relationship with Bill Gates began much later, after Epstein had already pleaded guilty in Florida and become a registered sex offender. Gates met with Epstein repeatedly beginning in 2011, largely during discussions about philanthropy, global health initiatives and the possibility that Epstein could help attract wealthy donors to major charitable projects. Gates later acknowledged that the meetings were a serious error in judgment and said Epstein never delivered the philanthropic funding he claimed he could assemble. More recent congressional testimony and released communications have added another dimension, with Gates saying Epstein learned private information about his extramarital affairs and later made what Gates characterized as veiled threats to expose them. Gates has denied Epstein’s more sensational allegations and has not been accused of participating in Epstein’s crimes. In all three relationships, Epstein appeared to benefit from proximity itself: Wolff offered access to the media and political intelligence, Clinton supplied enormous prestige and international credibility, and Gates connected Epstein to the highest levels of technology and global philanthropy.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73035199</guid><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73035199/megaepsteingatesclintonwolff.mp3" length="57448951" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5e409fc9-1ae9-4c07-bfc3-b2e3bc5b6a83/5e409fc9-1ae9-4c07-bfc3-b2e3bc5b6a83.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5e409fc9-1ae9-4c07-bfc3-b2e3bc5b6a83/5e409fc9-1ae9-4c07-bfc3-b2e3bc5b6a83.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5e409fc9-1ae9-4c07-bfc3-b2e3bc5b6a83/5e409fc9-1ae9-4c07-bfc3-b2e3bc5b6a83.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jeffrey Epstein’s relationships with Michael Wolff, Bill Clinton and Bill Gates differed in purpose and duration, but each demonstrates how Epstein sought access to influential people who could enhance his legitimacy. Wolff developed an unusually...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein’s relationships with Michael Wolff, Bill Clinton and Bill Gates differed in purpose and duration, but each demonstrates how Epstein sought access to influential people who could enhance his legitimacy. Wolff developed an unusually close source relationship with Epstein, conducting extensive interviews and exchanging emails with him over several years. Released correspondence suggested that Wolff sometimes moved beyond simply gathering information and offered Epstein advice about media strategy, particularly concerning Donald Trump and questions about Epstein’s past. Wolff has defended the contact as an aggressive journalistic effort to extract information from a uniquely knowledgeable source, but the tone of some exchanges raised questions about whether the relationship became too collaborative. Clinton’s connection to Epstein was more public and socially advantageous to Epstein. After Clinton left office, he traveled aboard Epstein’s aircraft on multiple international trips connected to humanitarian and Clinton Foundation work, accompanied by staff, supporters and, according to Clinton’s office, Secret Service personnel. Epstein also cultivated connections within Clinton’s political and philanthropic circle, while Clinton has maintained that he knew nothing about Epstein’s criminal conduct and ended contact years before Epstein’s 2019 arrest.<br /><br /><br />Epstein’s relationship with Bill Gates began much later, after Epstein had already pleaded guilty in Florida and become a registered sex offender. Gates met with Epstein repeatedly beginning in 2011, largely during discussions about philanthropy, global health initiatives and the possibility that Epstein could help attract wealthy donors to major charitable projects. Gates later acknowledged that the meetings were a serious error in judgment and said Epstein never delivered the philanthropic funding he claimed he could assemble. More recent congressional testimony and released communications have added another dimension, with Gates saying Epstein learned private information about his extramarital affairs and later made what Gates characterized as veiled threats to expose them. Gates has denied Epstein’s more sensational allegations and has not been accused of participating in Epstein’s crimes. In all three relationships, Epstein appeared to benefit from proximity itself: Wolff offered access to the media and political intelligence, Clinton supplied enormous prestige and international credibility, and Gates connected Epstein to the highest levels of technology and global philanthropy.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3591</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The USVI And Their Demand For A Jury Trial Against The Epstein Estate (Part 7)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-usvi-and-their-demand-for-a-jury-trial-against-the-epstein-estate-part-7--73016020</link><description><![CDATA[The climb into the Epstein sewer continues in this one as we begin our look at the USVI's demand for a trial against the Epstein estate.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />(commercial at 7:38)<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6658344-GVI-v-Estate-of-Jeffrey-E-Epstein-Et-Al.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GVI v Estate of Jeffrey E Epstein Et Al - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73016020</guid><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73016020/usvitrialdemand7.mp3" length="14786186" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9fcc8fd4-8293-4df3-8c3d-20799de49aef/9fcc8fd4-8293-4df3-8c3d-20799de49aef.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9fcc8fd4-8293-4df3-8c3d-20799de49aef/9fcc8fd4-8293-4df3-8c3d-20799de49aef.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9fcc8fd4-8293-4df3-8c3d-20799de49aef/9fcc8fd4-8293-4df3-8c3d-20799de49aef.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The climb into the Epstein sewer continues in this one as we begin our look at the USVI's demand for a trial against the Epstein estate.




(commercial at 7:38)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The climb into the Epstein sewer continues in this one as we begin our look at the USVI's demand for a trial against the Epstein estate.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />(commercial at 7:38)<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6658344-GVI-v-Estate-of-Jeffrey-E-Epstein-Et-Al.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GVI v Estate of Jeffrey E Epstein Et Al - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>925</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The USVI And Their Demand For A Jury Trial Against The Epstein Estate (Part 6)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-usvi-and-their-demand-for-a-jury-trial-against-the-epstein-estate-part-6--73016019</link><description><![CDATA[The climb into the Epstein sewer continues in this one as we begin our look at the USVI's demand for a trial against the Epstein estate.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />(commercial at 7:38)<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6658344-GVI-v-Estate-of-Jeffrey-E-Epstein-Et-Al.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GVI v Estate of Jeffrey E Epstein Et Al - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73016019</guid><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73016019/usvitrialdemand6.mp3" length="11452125" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a32c6f61-a40b-4257-9412-d7b3e0db9a0a/a32c6f61-a40b-4257-9412-d7b3e0db9a0a.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a32c6f61-a40b-4257-9412-d7b3e0db9a0a/a32c6f61-a40b-4257-9412-d7b3e0db9a0a.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a32c6f61-a40b-4257-9412-d7b3e0db9a0a/a32c6f61-a40b-4257-9412-d7b3e0db9a0a.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The climb into the Epstein sewer continues in this one as we begin our look at the USVI's demand for a trial against the Epstein estate.




(commercial at 7:38)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The climb into the Epstein sewer continues in this one as we begin our look at the USVI's demand for a trial against the Epstein estate.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />(commercial at 7:38)<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6658344-GVI-v-Estate-of-Jeffrey-E-Epstein-Et-Al.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GVI v Estate of Jeffrey E Epstein Et Al - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>716</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The USVI And Their Demand For A Jury Trial Against The Epstein Estate (Part 5)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-usvi-and-their-demand-for-a-jury-trial-against-the-epstein-estate-part-5--73016017</link><description><![CDATA[The climb into the Epstein sewer continues in this one as we begin our look at the USVI's demand for a trial against the Epstein estate.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />(commercial at 7:38)<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6658344-GVI-v-Estate-of-Jeffrey-E-Epstein-Et-Al.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GVI v Estate of Jeffrey E Epstein Et Al - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73016017</guid><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73016017/usvitrialdemand5.mp3" length="12304344" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6b21eed5-2ac5-4d27-9153-f22a025d626f/6b21eed5-2ac5-4d27-9153-f22a025d626f.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6b21eed5-2ac5-4d27-9153-f22a025d626f/6b21eed5-2ac5-4d27-9153-f22a025d626f.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6b21eed5-2ac5-4d27-9153-f22a025d626f/6b21eed5-2ac5-4d27-9153-f22a025d626f.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The climb into the Epstein sewer continues in this one as we begin our look at the USVI's demand for a trial against the Epstein estate.




(commercial at 7:38)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The climb into the Epstein sewer continues in this one as we begin our look at the USVI's demand for a trial against the Epstein estate.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />(commercial at 7:38)<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6658344-GVI-v-Estate-of-Jeffrey-E-Epstein-Et-Al.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GVI v Estate of Jeffrey E Epstein Et Al - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>769</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The USVI And Their Demand For A Jury Trial Against The Epstein Estate (Part 4)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-usvi-and-their-demand-for-a-jury-trial-against-the-epstein-estate-part-4--73016022</link><description><![CDATA[The climb into the Epstein sewer continues in this one as we begin our look at the USVI's demand for a trial against the Epstein estate.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6658344-GVI-v-Estate-of-Jeffrey-E-Epstein-Et-Al.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GVI v Estate of Jeffrey E Epstein Et Al - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73016022</guid><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 22:44:49 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73016022/usvitrialdemand4.mp3" length="11420778" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/49af1eb0-57ca-48fa-8c58-192ca444a8b7/49af1eb0-57ca-48fa-8c58-192ca444a8b7.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/49af1eb0-57ca-48fa-8c58-192ca444a8b7/49af1eb0-57ca-48fa-8c58-192ca444a8b7.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/49af1eb0-57ca-48fa-8c58-192ca444a8b7/49af1eb0-57ca-48fa-8c58-192ca444a8b7.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The climb into the Epstein sewer continues in this one as we begin our look at the USVI's demand for a trial against the Epstein estate.





to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The climb into the Epstein sewer continues in this one as we begin our look at the USVI's demand for a trial against the Epstein estate.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6658344-GVI-v-Estate-of-Jeffrey-E-Epstein-Et-Al.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GVI v Estate of Jeffrey E Epstein Et Al - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>714</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Tyler Robinson and the Question of Advance Knowledge (Part 2) (7/17/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-and-the-question-of-advance-knowledge-part-2-7-17-26--73019524</link><description><![CDATA[The most plausible theory surrounding the murder of Charlie Kirk is not that Tyler Robinson was framed or that multiple gunmen were involved, but that one or more people may have known about the plan before the shooting. Robinson allegedly prepared carefully, traveled to Utah Valley University, changed clothing, positioned himself on a rooftop, used a rifle, and attempted to escape, all of which suggests planning rather than a spontaneous act. The theory becomes more compelling because of online posts that appeared to anticipate Kirk’s death or suggest that something significant was going to happen at the university. Robinson’s immersion in gaming communities, private chats, memes, and online subcultures also raises the possibility that he discussed his intentions, sought encouragement, or revealed pieces of the plan to people who understood more than they later admitted. The engraved ammunition, his alleged communications, and his reported confession to online friends after the shooting all point toward an attacker who viewed the internet as an important social and ideological space.<br /><br />Any broader involvement may have been limited, fragmented, and entirely digital rather than a formal conspiracy. One person could have known the target, another could have heard about the location, and someone else may have helped with ammunition, logistics, or emotional encouragement without understanding every detail. The suspicious posts, private chats, deleted messages, account connections, and possible warnings should therefore be examined as pieces of a larger online trail. This theory does not require another shooter or a professional organization. It only requires the possibility that Robinson’s violent ideas were shared, reinforced, or quietly tolerated within a small circle before he acted. The most likely version of outside involvement would be a loose network of people connected through private messages, dark humor, ideological hostility, partial disclosures, and silence rather than a carefully structured plot.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73019524</guid><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73019524/robinsonaccomplices2.mp3" length="14082342" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/469ae5d0-1bd4-4cdb-9951-4447f3a902e5/469ae5d0-1bd4-4cdb-9951-4447f3a902e5.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/469ae5d0-1bd4-4cdb-9951-4447f3a902e5/469ae5d0-1bd4-4cdb-9951-4447f3a902e5.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/469ae5d0-1bd4-4cdb-9951-4447f3a902e5/469ae5d0-1bd4-4cdb-9951-4447f3a902e5.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The most plausible theory surrounding the murder of Charlie Kirk is not that Tyler Robinson was framed or that multiple gunmen were involved, but that one or more people may have known about the plan before the shooting. Robinson allegedly prepared...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The most plausible theory surrounding the murder of Charlie Kirk is not that Tyler Robinson was framed or that multiple gunmen were involved, but that one or more people may have known about the plan before the shooting. Robinson allegedly prepared carefully, traveled to Utah Valley University, changed clothing, positioned himself on a rooftop, used a rifle, and attempted to escape, all of which suggests planning rather than a spontaneous act. The theory becomes more compelling because of online posts that appeared to anticipate Kirk’s death or suggest that something significant was going to happen at the university. Robinson’s immersion in gaming communities, private chats, memes, and online subcultures also raises the possibility that he discussed his intentions, sought encouragement, or revealed pieces of the plan to people who understood more than they later admitted. The engraved ammunition, his alleged communications, and his reported confession to online friends after the shooting all point toward an attacker who viewed the internet as an important social and ideological space.<br /><br />Any broader involvement may have been limited, fragmented, and entirely digital rather than a formal conspiracy. One person could have known the target, another could have heard about the location, and someone else may have helped with ammunition, logistics, or emotional encouragement without understanding every detail. The suspicious posts, private chats, deleted messages, account connections, and possible warnings should therefore be examined as pieces of a larger online trail. This theory does not require another shooter or a professional organization. It only requires the possibility that Robinson’s violent ideas were shared, reinforced, or quietly tolerated within a small circle before he acted. The most likely version of outside involvement would be a loose network of people connected through private messages, dark humor, ideological hostility, partial disclosures, and silence rather than a carefully structured plot.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>881</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvu</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Tyler Robinson and the Question of Advance Knowledge (Part 1) (7/17/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-and-the-question-of-advance-knowledge-part-1-7-17-26--73019523</link><description><![CDATA[The most plausible theory surrounding the murder of Charlie Kirk is not that Tyler Robinson was framed or that multiple gunmen were involved, but that one or more people may have known about the plan before the shooting. Robinson allegedly prepared carefully, traveled to Utah Valley University, changed clothing, positioned himself on a rooftop, used a rifle, and attempted to escape, all of which suggests planning rather than a spontaneous act. The theory becomes more compelling because of online posts that appeared to anticipate Kirk’s death or suggest that something significant was going to happen at the university. Robinson’s immersion in gaming communities, private chats, memes, and online subcultures also raises the possibility that he discussed his intentions, sought encouragement, or revealed pieces of the plan to people who understood more than they later admitted. The engraved ammunition, his alleged communications, and his reported confession to online friends after the shooting all point toward an attacker who viewed the internet as an important social and ideological space.<br /><br />Any broader involvement may have been limited, fragmented, and entirely digital rather than a formal conspiracy. One person could have known the target, another could have heard about the location, and someone else may have helped with ammunition, logistics, or emotional encouragement without understanding every detail. The suspicious posts, private chats, deleted messages, account connections, and possible warnings should therefore be examined as pieces of a larger online trail. This theory does not require another shooter or a professional organization. It only requires the possibility that Robinson’s violent ideas were shared, reinforced, or quietly tolerated within a small circle before he acted. The most likely version of outside involvement would be a loose network of people connected through private messages, dark humor, ideological hostility, partial disclosures, and silence rather than a carefully structured plot.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73019523</guid><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 18:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73019523/robinsonaccomplices1.mp3" length="14762362" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ca3c7fe3-d5da-486b-8a89-eeb41fa1d3fa/ca3c7fe3-d5da-486b-8a89-eeb41fa1d3fa.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ca3c7fe3-d5da-486b-8a89-eeb41fa1d3fa/ca3c7fe3-d5da-486b-8a89-eeb41fa1d3fa.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ca3c7fe3-d5da-486b-8a89-eeb41fa1d3fa/ca3c7fe3-d5da-486b-8a89-eeb41fa1d3fa.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The most plausible theory surrounding the murder of Charlie Kirk is not that Tyler Robinson was framed or that multiple gunmen were involved, but that one or more people may have known about the plan before the shooting. Robinson allegedly prepared...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The most plausible theory surrounding the murder of Charlie Kirk is not that Tyler Robinson was framed or that multiple gunmen were involved, but that one or more people may have known about the plan before the shooting. Robinson allegedly prepared carefully, traveled to Utah Valley University, changed clothing, positioned himself on a rooftop, used a rifle, and attempted to escape, all of which suggests planning rather than a spontaneous act. The theory becomes more compelling because of online posts that appeared to anticipate Kirk’s death or suggest that something significant was going to happen at the university. Robinson’s immersion in gaming communities, private chats, memes, and online subcultures also raises the possibility that he discussed his intentions, sought encouragement, or revealed pieces of the plan to people who understood more than they later admitted. The engraved ammunition, his alleged communications, and his reported confession to online friends after the shooting all point toward an attacker who viewed the internet as an important social and ideological space.<br /><br />Any broader involvement may have been limited, fragmented, and entirely digital rather than a formal conspiracy. One person could have known the target, another could have heard about the location, and someone else may have helped with ammunition, logistics, or emotional encouragement without understanding every detail. The suspicious posts, private chats, deleted messages, account connections, and possible warnings should therefore be examined as pieces of a larger online trail. This theory does not require another shooter or a professional organization. It only requires the possibility that Robinson’s violent ideas were shared, reinforced, or quietly tolerated within a small circle before he acted. The most likely version of outside involvement would be a loose network of people connected through private messages, dark humor, ideological hostility, partial disclosures, and silence rather than a carefully structured plot.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>923</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvu</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Jeffrey Epstein and the de Rothschild Bank’s $25 Million Payday (7/17/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/jeffrey-epstein-and-the-de-rothschild-bank-s-25-million-payday-7-17-26--73019526</link><description><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein used his access to powerful people and institutions to secure a $25 million payment from Edmond de Rothschild’s Swiss private bank during a federal investigation into whether the bank helped wealthy Americans hide assets from the IRS. Epstein introduced the bank’s leader, Ariane de Rothschild, to former Obama White House counsel Kathy Ruemmler, who had recently returned to Latham &amp; Watkins. Ruemmler and her legal team conducted the substantive work of reviewing bank records and negotiating with the Justice Department, while Epstein remained involved behind the scenes as a connector and adviser. Documents show Epstein arranged a compensation structure tied to the size of the bank’s eventual penalty, with his payment increasing to $25 million if the settlement came in below $100 million. The bank ultimately agreed to pay approximately $45.5 million, allowing Epstein to collect the maximum fee even though the law firms representing the bank reportedly received only about $10 million combined.<br /><br />The arrangement also provides new insight into Epstein’s close relationship with Ruemmler, who is scheduled to answer questions before the House Oversight Committee. Emails indicate Epstein introduced her to influential figures including Bill Gates, Peter Thiel and Ehud Barak, while Ruemmler sometimes referred to him as “Uncle Jeffrey” and accepted expensive gifts from him. Although one source said Epstein had no direct role in the detailed legal work, Ruemmler discussed hiring him as a consultant through her firm, partly to protect their communications through attorney-client privilege. Ruemmler has maintained that she knew Epstein only while working in private practice, saw no evidence that he was continuing to abuse women and had no knowledge of ongoing criminal activity. The documents nevertheless show how Epstein transformed introductions, perceived expertise and elite relationships into enormous profits while preserving his influence years after becoming a registered sex offender.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/jeffrey-epstein-kathy-ruemmler-swiss-bank-settlement/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">How Jeffrey Epstein parlayed his elite network into a $25 million payday - CBS News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73019526</guid><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73019526/epsteinruemmler25milliondollarypayday.mp3" length="19877346" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/de1fb4b2-1fe4-4c0d-90d5-607663970fb6/de1fb4b2-1fe4-4c0d-90d5-607663970fb6.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/de1fb4b2-1fe4-4c0d-90d5-607663970fb6/de1fb4b2-1fe4-4c0d-90d5-607663970fb6.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/de1fb4b2-1fe4-4c0d-90d5-607663970fb6/de1fb4b2-1fe4-4c0d-90d5-607663970fb6.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jeffrey Epstein used his access to powerful people and institutions to secure a $25 million payment from Edmond de Rothschild’s Swiss private bank during a federal investigation into whether the bank helped wealthy Americans hide assets from the IRS....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein used his access to powerful people and institutions to secure a $25 million payment from Edmond de Rothschild’s Swiss private bank during a federal investigation into whether the bank helped wealthy Americans hide assets from the IRS. Epstein introduced the bank’s leader, Ariane de Rothschild, to former Obama White House counsel Kathy Ruemmler, who had recently returned to Latham &amp; Watkins. Ruemmler and her legal team conducted the substantive work of reviewing bank records and negotiating with the Justice Department, while Epstein remained involved behind the scenes as a connector and adviser. Documents show Epstein arranged a compensation structure tied to the size of the bank’s eventual penalty, with his payment increasing to $25 million if the settlement came in below $100 million. The bank ultimately agreed to pay approximately $45.5 million, allowing Epstein to collect the maximum fee even though the law firms representing the bank reportedly received only about $10 million combined.<br /><br />The arrangement also provides new insight into Epstein’s close relationship with Ruemmler, who is scheduled to answer questions before the House Oversight Committee. Emails indicate Epstein introduced her to influential figures including Bill Gates, Peter Thiel and Ehud Barak, while Ruemmler sometimes referred to him as “Uncle Jeffrey” and accepted expensive gifts from him. Although one source said Epstein had no direct role in the detailed legal work, Ruemmler discussed hiring him as a consultant through her firm, partly to protect their communications through attorney-client privilege. Ruemmler has maintained that she knew Epstein only while working in private practice, saw no evidence that he was continuing to abuse women and had no knowledge of ongoing criminal activity. The documents nevertheless show how Epstein transformed introductions, perceived expertise and elite relationships into enormous profits while preserving his influence years after becoming a registered sex offender.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/jeffrey-epstein-kathy-ruemmler-swiss-bank-settlement/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">How Jeffrey Epstein parlayed his elite network into a $25 million payday - CBS News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1243</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>JD Vance Admits the White House “Screwed Up” the Epstein Files Release (7/17/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/jd-vance-admits-the-white-house-screwed-up-the-epstein-files-release-7-17-26--73019531</link><description><![CDATA[Vice President JD Vance told Joe Rogan that certain elements within the Israeli government were attempting to undermine American diplomatic efforts and prolong the war with Iran indefinitely. Vance said the United States had reached the practical limits of what military force could accomplish and argued that negotiations offered the only realistic path toward ending the conflict. He accused pro-war Israeli figures and their allies of running an influence campaign against him and others seeking a settlement, while stressing that his responsibility was to protect American interests rather than support an endless foreign war. His comments revealed a widening dispute inside the Trump administration and the Republican Party over Israel, Iran and the extent to which the United States should remain involved in the conflict.<br /><br />Vance also admitted that the Trump administration badly mishandled the release of the Epstein records, telling Rogan that officials “absolutely screwed up” the communications surrounding the process. He blamed inflated expectations, confusing statements from former Attorney General Pam Bondi and the heavily promoted release of binders containing largely familiar information for creating the appearance of concealment. Vance denied that President Trump deliberately covered anything up, but said the administration should have released the properly redacted records more quickly and clearly. Although he described himself as a longtime believer that there was more to Epstein’s operation, Vance said he had not seen direct evidence proving an intelligence connection, while acknowledging that any such records might have disappeared long ago.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73019531</guid><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73019531/vancerogan.mp3" length="12120442" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/db822576-d5c8-46ff-ba7a-f6d9c5356cb7/db822576-d5c8-46ff-ba7a-f6d9c5356cb7.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/db822576-d5c8-46ff-ba7a-f6d9c5356cb7/db822576-d5c8-46ff-ba7a-f6d9c5356cb7.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/db822576-d5c8-46ff-ba7a-f6d9c5356cb7/db822576-d5c8-46ff-ba7a-f6d9c5356cb7.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Vice President JD Vance told Joe Rogan that certain elements within the Israeli government were attempting to undermine American diplomatic efforts and prolong the war with Iran indefinitely. Vance said the United States had reached the practical...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Vice President JD Vance told Joe Rogan that certain elements within the Israeli government were attempting to undermine American diplomatic efforts and prolong the war with Iran indefinitely. Vance said the United States had reached the practical limits of what military force could accomplish and argued that negotiations offered the only realistic path toward ending the conflict. He accused pro-war Israeli figures and their allies of running an influence campaign against him and others seeking a settlement, while stressing that his responsibility was to protect American interests rather than support an endless foreign war. His comments revealed a widening dispute inside the Trump administration and the Republican Party over Israel, Iran and the extent to which the United States should remain involved in the conflict.<br /><br />Vance also admitted that the Trump administration badly mishandled the release of the Epstein records, telling Rogan that officials “absolutely screwed up” the communications surrounding the process. He blamed inflated expectations, confusing statements from former Attorney General Pam Bondi and the heavily promoted release of binders containing largely familiar information for creating the appearance of concealment. Vance denied that President Trump deliberately covered anything up, but said the administration should have released the properly redacted records more quickly and clearly. Although he described himself as a longtime believer that there was more to Epstein’s operation, Vance said he had not seen direct evidence proving an intelligence connection, while acknowledging that any such records might have disappeared long ago.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>758</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Todd Blanche Defends the DOJ’s Handling of the Epstein Case (7/17/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/todd-blanche-defends-the-doj-s-handling-of-the-epstein-case-7-17-26--73019525</link><description><![CDATA[Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche told senators during his July 15 confirmation hearing that the Justice Department has not permanently closed the door on prosecuting additional people connected to Jeffrey Epstein. Blanche said the department would investigate, indict and prosecute anyone if credible new evidence emerged showing that person participated in Epstein’s sex-trafficking operation. He distinguished between the DOJ’s completed review of its existing Epstein records and the department’s continuing authority to open new criminal cases. Although the prosecutions of Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell have ended, Blanche insisted that investigators remain prepared to act immediately if victims, attorneys or other witnesses provide information capable of supporting charges.<br /><br />Blanche also defended the DOJ against accusations that it has abandoned Epstein’s survivors, saying officials have met with representatives of more than 30 victims and will continue speaking with anyone who comes forward. He encouraged victims and their lawyers to contact the FBI with additional evidence, promising that the department would investigate it fully. His comments came amid criticism of the government’s handling of the Epstein records, including the earlier DOJ and FBI conclusion that investigators found no evidence of a formal “client list” and no justification for additional public disclosures. Blanche’s position is that the existing document review may be finished, but the broader possibility of prosecuting new suspects remains open if evidence strong enough to sustain a criminal case is produced.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.foxnews.com/politics/todd-blanche-says-no-closed-investigations-epstein-case-vows-doj-pursue-new-suspects" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Todd Blanche says Epstein prosecution remains open to new evidence | Fox News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73019525</guid><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73019525/blancheconfirmationhearing.mp3" length="10704396" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9464dee9-30b5-47b3-adbe-2f0332c8735a/9464dee9-30b5-47b3-adbe-2f0332c8735a.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9464dee9-30b5-47b3-adbe-2f0332c8735a/9464dee9-30b5-47b3-adbe-2f0332c8735a.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9464dee9-30b5-47b3-adbe-2f0332c8735a/9464dee9-30b5-47b3-adbe-2f0332c8735a.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche told senators during his July 15 confirmation hearing that the Justice Department has not permanently closed the door on prosecuting additional people connected to Jeffrey Epstein. Blanche said the department would...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche told senators during his July 15 confirmation hearing that the Justice Department has not permanently closed the door on prosecuting additional people connected to Jeffrey Epstein. Blanche said the department would investigate, indict and prosecute anyone if credible new evidence emerged showing that person participated in Epstein’s sex-trafficking operation. He distinguished between the DOJ’s completed review of its existing Epstein records and the department’s continuing authority to open new criminal cases. Although the prosecutions of Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell have ended, Blanche insisted that investigators remain prepared to act immediately if victims, attorneys or other witnesses provide information capable of supporting charges.<br /><br />Blanche also defended the DOJ against accusations that it has abandoned Epstein’s survivors, saying officials have met with representatives of more than 30 victims and will continue speaking with anyone who comes forward. He encouraged victims and their lawyers to contact the FBI with additional evidence, promising that the department would investigate it fully. His comments came amid criticism of the government’s handling of the Epstein records, including the earlier DOJ and FBI conclusion that investigators found no evidence of a formal “client list” and no justification for additional public disclosures. Blanche’s position is that the existing document review may be finished, but the broader possibility of prosecuting new suspects remains open if evidence strong enough to sustain a criminal case is produced.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.foxnews.com/politics/todd-blanche-says-no-closed-investigations-epstein-case-vows-doj-pursue-new-suspects" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Todd Blanche says Epstein prosecution remains open to new evidence | Fox News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>669</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   Jeffrey Epstein's And The Real Service He Provided People (7/17/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-s-and-the-real-service-he-provided-people-7-17-26--73018156</link><description><![CDATA[<br />Jeffrey Epstein demonstrated a sophisticated ability to obscure where his money came from, where it moved and who ultimately benefited from it. He operated through layers of corporations, trusts, offshore accounts and entities registered in secrecy-friendly jurisdictions, making his financial network difficult to trace as a single, coherent operation. Investigative records have shown that his wealth was spread across numerous companies and banking relationships, while large sums moved between investment vehicles, private accounts and offshore structures. That complexity gave Epstein more than tax advantages. It created distance between his name and his assets, frustrated outside scrutiny and made it harder for victims, investigators and courts to obtain a complete picture of his fortune.<br /><br />The clearest example of Epstein’s financial sophistication may have been Southern Country International, the U.S. Virgin Islands bank he controlled. The bank reportedly had no conventional public-facing operation and remained largely dormant before processing tens of millions of dollars during the months leading up to his July 2019 arrest. Epstein also maintained relationships across major financial institutions long after his 2008 conviction, allowing him to move money through respected banks and investment firms while his broader financial activity remained deeply opaque. It is important to distinguish proven money laundering from financial behavior that appeared structured to conceal ownership and movement, but the surviving record shows that Epstein understood how to use shell entities, offshore jurisdictions, professional intermediaries and fragmented banking relationships to keep his wealth hidden behind layers of legal and financial complexity.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonman.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73018156</guid><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73018156/8d6aa232_1a2f_4afd_877b_e6d098881b2c.mp3" length="51635975" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/79f22d28-1ad5-4760-81b3-1251a914a366/79f22d28-1ad5-4760-81b3-1251a914a366.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/79f22d28-1ad5-4760-81b3-1251a914a366/79f22d28-1ad5-4760-81b3-1251a914a366.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/79f22d28-1ad5-4760-81b3-1251a914a366/79f22d28-1ad5-4760-81b3-1251a914a366.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jeffrey Epstein demonstrated a sophisticated ability to obscure where his money came from, where it moved and who ultimately benefited from it. He operated through layers of corporations, trusts, offshore accounts and entities registered in...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br />Jeffrey Epstein demonstrated a sophisticated ability to obscure where his money came from, where it moved and who ultimately benefited from it. He operated through layers of corporations, trusts, offshore accounts and entities registered in secrecy-friendly jurisdictions, making his financial network difficult to trace as a single, coherent operation. Investigative records have shown that his wealth was spread across numerous companies and banking relationships, while large sums moved between investment vehicles, private accounts and offshore structures. That complexity gave Epstein more than tax advantages. It created distance between his name and his assets, frustrated outside scrutiny and made it harder for victims, investigators and courts to obtain a complete picture of his fortune.<br /><br />The clearest example of Epstein’s financial sophistication may have been Southern Country International, the U.S. Virgin Islands bank he controlled. The bank reportedly had no conventional public-facing operation and remained largely dormant before processing tens of millions of dollars during the months leading up to his July 2019 arrest. Epstein also maintained relationships across major financial institutions long after his 2008 conviction, allowing him to move money through respected banks and investment firms while his broader financial activity remained deeply opaque. It is important to distinguish proven money laundering from financial behavior that appeared structured to conceal ownership and movement, but the surviving record shows that Epstein understood how to use shell entities, offshore jurisdictions, professional intermediaries and fragmented banking relationships to keep his wealth hidden behind layers of legal and financial complexity.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonman.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3228</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Zorro Ranch And The Mysteries It Still Holds (7/17/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-zorro-ranch-and-the-mysteries-it-still-holds-7-17-26--73018155</link><description><![CDATA[Zorro Ranch was long one of the least thoroughly examined pieces of Jeffrey Epstein’s world, despite repeated allegations that women and girls were taken there and abused. Unlike his Manhattan townhouse and Palm Beach residence, the sprawling New Mexico property was not searched by federal authorities after his 2019 arrest, leaving years of activity at the ranch largely unexplored. Its remote location, enormous size and limited law-enforcement scrutiny allowed it to remain one of the darkest gaps in the Epstein investigation, with unanswered questions about who visited, what records were kept there and how the property fit into his broader trafficking operation.<br /><br />That changed in March 2026, when New Mexico investigators finally searched the former ranch after reopening a criminal investigation, but the passage of time has made the search for answers far more difficult. The property had already been sold, witnesses had scattered, physical evidence may have deteriorated and federal records needed by state investigators remained heavily redacted or unavailable. New Mexico officials say those records may identify survivors, witnesses and possible co-conspirators, meaning Zorro Ranch may still hold information capable of expanding the known scope of Epstein’s crimes. The ranch is no longer accurate to describe as never searched, but it remains one of his least fully investigated properties and one of the places most likely to contain secrets that were ignored for far too long.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73018155</guid><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73018155/1be3ca03_f06b_46e4_b2cd_7b45403e0722.mp3" length="46852850" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3ba51557-adf9-4353-8f31-9b18b3082905/3ba51557-adf9-4353-8f31-9b18b3082905.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3ba51557-adf9-4353-8f31-9b18b3082905/3ba51557-adf9-4353-8f31-9b18b3082905.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3ba51557-adf9-4353-8f31-9b18b3082905/3ba51557-adf9-4353-8f31-9b18b3082905.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Zorro Ranch was long one of the least thoroughly examined pieces of Jeffrey Epstein’s world, despite repeated allegations that women and girls were taken there and abused. Unlike his Manhattan townhouse and Palm Beach residence, the sprawling New...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Zorro Ranch was long one of the least thoroughly examined pieces of Jeffrey Epstein’s world, despite repeated allegations that women and girls were taken there and abused. Unlike his Manhattan townhouse and Palm Beach residence, the sprawling New Mexico property was not searched by federal authorities after his 2019 arrest, leaving years of activity at the ranch largely unexplored. Its remote location, enormous size and limited law-enforcement scrutiny allowed it to remain one of the darkest gaps in the Epstein investigation, with unanswered questions about who visited, what records were kept there and how the property fit into his broader trafficking operation.<br /><br />That changed in March 2026, when New Mexico investigators finally searched the former ranch after reopening a criminal investigation, but the passage of time has made the search for answers far more difficult. The property had already been sold, witnesses had scattered, physical evidence may have deteriorated and federal records needed by state investigators remained heavily redacted or unavailable. New Mexico officials say those records may identify survivors, witnesses and possible co-conspirators, meaning Zorro Ranch may still hold information capable of expanding the known scope of Epstein’s crimes. The ranch is no longer accurate to describe as never searched, but it remains one of his least fully investigated properties and one of the places most likely to contain secrets that were ignored for far too long.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2929</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Jeffrey Epstein And The Friends Who Had No Shame (7/16/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-the-friends-who-had-no-shame-7-16-26--73018154</link><description><![CDATA[As Jeffrey Epstein faced prosecution in Florida, his friends and associates sent a letter to prosecutors portraying him as a generous, accomplished and valuable member of society who deserved leniency. That intervention was part of a broader effort to replace the image emerging from the evidence with a carefully manufactured portrait of a respectable financier, philanthropist and trusted adviser to influential people. Instead of confronting the scale of the allegations against him, members of his social circle effectively used their names and reputations to reassure authorities that Epstein belonged among the respectable elite. The letter demonstrated how his network functioned as a protective asset, with powerful acquaintances helping create the impression that he was too connected, useful and socially established to be treated like an ordinary criminal defendant.<br /><br />Epstein’s relationships with Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson strengthened that image by giving him something money alone could not purchase: proximity to the British royal family. Photographs, palace invitations, royal gatherings and his highly visible friendship with Andrew helped Epstein present himself as a man accepted at the highest levels of international society. Ferguson’s financial dealings and warm private communications with Epstein further reinforced the appearance that he was not merely tolerated by the royal circle, but trusted and valued within it. That royal association became part of Epstein’s social armor, allowing him to impress business figures, cultivate new relationships and suggest that anyone welcomed by Andrew and Fergie must be legitimate, respectable and safe.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73018154</guid><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73018154/e6bc0495_679b_49c8_80d2_66abe41a5f46.mp3" length="39689030" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0969a565-4c79-43a9-8bf4-b21e930a07bf/0969a565-4c79-43a9-8bf4-b21e930a07bf.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0969a565-4c79-43a9-8bf4-b21e930a07bf/0969a565-4c79-43a9-8bf4-b21e930a07bf.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0969a565-4c79-43a9-8bf4-b21e930a07bf/0969a565-4c79-43a9-8bf4-b21e930a07bf.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>As Jeffrey Epstein faced prosecution in Florida, his friends and associates sent a letter to prosecutors portraying him as a generous, accomplished and valuable member of society who deserved leniency. That intervention was part of a broader effort to...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[As Jeffrey Epstein faced prosecution in Florida, his friends and associates sent a letter to prosecutors portraying him as a generous, accomplished and valuable member of society who deserved leniency. That intervention was part of a broader effort to replace the image emerging from the evidence with a carefully manufactured portrait of a respectable financier, philanthropist and trusted adviser to influential people. Instead of confronting the scale of the allegations against him, members of his social circle effectively used their names and reputations to reassure authorities that Epstein belonged among the respectable elite. The letter demonstrated how his network functioned as a protective asset, with powerful acquaintances helping create the impression that he was too connected, useful and socially established to be treated like an ordinary criminal defendant.<br /><br />Epstein’s relationships with Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson strengthened that image by giving him something money alone could not purchase: proximity to the British royal family. Photographs, palace invitations, royal gatherings and his highly visible friendship with Andrew helped Epstein present himself as a man accepted at the highest levels of international society. Ferguson’s financial dealings and warm private communications with Epstein further reinforced the appearance that he was not merely tolerated by the royal circle, but trusted and valued within it. That royal association became part of Epstein’s social armor, allowing him to impress business figures, cultivate new relationships and suggest that anyone welcomed by Andrew and Fergie must be legitimate, respectable and safe.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2481</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The USVI And Their Demand For A Jury Trial Against The Epstein Estate (Part 3)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-usvi-and-their-demand-for-a-jury-trial-against-the-epstein-estate-part-3--73016016</link><description><![CDATA[The climb into the Epstein sewer continues in this one as we begin our look at the USVI's demand for a trial against the Epstein estate.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6658344-GVI-v-Estate-of-Jeffrey-E-Epstein-Et-Al.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GVI v Estate of Jeffrey E Epstein Et Al - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73016016</guid><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73016016/usvitrialdemand3.mp3" length="11171675" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3a5a32ef-2fe0-4a22-9e9e-90d9a19e2ef0/3a5a32ef-2fe0-4a22-9e9e-90d9a19e2ef0.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3a5a32ef-2fe0-4a22-9e9e-90d9a19e2ef0/3a5a32ef-2fe0-4a22-9e9e-90d9a19e2ef0.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3a5a32ef-2fe0-4a22-9e9e-90d9a19e2ef0/3a5a32ef-2fe0-4a22-9e9e-90d9a19e2ef0.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The climb into the Epstein sewer continues in this one as we begin our look at the USVI's demand for a trial against the Epstein estate.





to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The climb into the Epstein sewer continues in this one as we begin our look at the USVI's demand for a trial against the Epstein estate.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6658344-GVI-v-Estate-of-Jeffrey-E-Epstein-Et-Al.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GVI v Estate of Jeffrey E Epstein Et Al - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>699</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The USVI And Their Demand For A Jury Trial Against The Epstein Estate (Part 2)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-usvi-and-their-demand-for-a-jury-trial-against-the-epstein-estate-part-2--73016018</link><description><![CDATA[The climb into the Epstein sewer continues in this one as we begin our look at the USVI's demand for a trial against the Epstein estate.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6658344-GVI-v-Estate-of-Jeffrey-E-Epstein-Et-Al.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GVI v Estate of Jeffrey E Epstein Et Al - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73016018</guid><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73016018/usvitrialdemand2.mp3" length="11446274" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0f65a68b-3caf-44b4-92eb-10b0cc5d6846/0f65a68b-3caf-44b4-92eb-10b0cc5d6846.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0f65a68b-3caf-44b4-92eb-10b0cc5d6846/0f65a68b-3caf-44b4-92eb-10b0cc5d6846.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0f65a68b-3caf-44b4-92eb-10b0cc5d6846/0f65a68b-3caf-44b4-92eb-10b0cc5d6846.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The climb into the Epstein sewer continues in this one as we begin our look at the USVI's demand for a trial against the Epstein estate.





to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The climb into the Epstein sewer continues in this one as we begin our look at the USVI's demand for a trial against the Epstein estate.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6658344-GVI-v-Estate-of-Jeffrey-E-Epstein-Et-Al.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GVI v Estate of Jeffrey E Epstein Et Al - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>716</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The USVI And Their Demand For A Jury Trial Against The Epstein Estate (Part 1)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-usvi-and-their-demand-for-a-jury-trial-against-the-epstein-estate-part-1--73016021</link><description><![CDATA[The climb into the Epstein sewer continues in this one as we begin our look at the USVI's demand for a trial against the Epstein estate.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6658344-GVI-v-Estate-of-Jeffrey-E-Epstein-Et-Al.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GVI v Estate of Jeffrey E Epstein Et Al - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73016021</guid><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73016021/usvitrialdemand1.mp3" length="10739923" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/26d22b7f-2d93-4a13-94fb-fe12aa5c55e2/26d22b7f-2d93-4a13-94fb-fe12aa5c55e2.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/26d22b7f-2d93-4a13-94fb-fe12aa5c55e2/26d22b7f-2d93-4a13-94fb-fe12aa5c55e2.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/26d22b7f-2d93-4a13-94fb-fe12aa5c55e2/26d22b7f-2d93-4a13-94fb-fe12aa5c55e2.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The climb into the Epstein sewer continues in this one as we begin our look at the USVI's demand for a trial against the Epstein estate.





to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The climb into the Epstein sewer continues in this one as we begin our look at the USVI's demand for a trial against the Epstein estate.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6658344-GVI-v-Estate-of-Jeffrey-E-Epstein-Et-Al.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GVI v Estate of Jeffrey E Epstein Et Al - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>672</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Five Alternate Theories Surrounding Charlie Kirk’s Murder (Part 3) (7/16/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-five-alternate-theories-surrounding-charlie-kirk-s-murder-part-3-7-16-26--72997825</link><description><![CDATA[Since Charlie Kirk’s murder, five major conspiracy theories have dominated the online conversation: that Tyler Robinson was never on the Utah Valley University campus, that another shooter fired the fatal round, that police fabricated the digital and forensic evidence, that people inside Turning Point USA helped arrange or conceal the killing, and that a foreign government ordered the assassination. Each theory begins with a real uncertainty or weakness, such as unclear surveillance footage, inconclusive ballistics, questions about digital-message authentication, inadequate event security, or Kirk’s political disagreements. The problem is that these legitimate questions are repeatedly stretched into sweeping claims that require investigators, witnesses, relatives, forensic analysts, prosecutors, political organizations, and foreign actors to participate in a coordinated deception. The publicly described evidence instead links Robinson to the campus through surveillance footage, his vehicle, DNA found on items associated with the rifle and rooftop, cellphone data, witness statements, and multiple alleged admissions. None of that proves guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, but it makes claims that Robinson was completely framed or absent from the scene extremely difficult to support.<br /><br />The strongest approach is to separate legitimate courtroom challenges from unsupported accusations. Robinson remains presumed innocent, and his defense has every right to challenge the identification evidence, DNA analysis, scene preservation, ballistics, digital extractions, witness interviews, and alleged confessions, especially in a death-penalty case. However, inconclusive bullet testing does not mean the rifle was excluded, poor security does not prove an intentional stand-down, and political disagreements do not establish that Turning Point USA, Erika Kirk, Israel, or any other foreign government arranged the murder. No credible public evidence has revealed payments, communications, handlers, operational plans, or witnesses connecting those parties to the shooting. The evidence currently points toward Robinson as the alleged gunman, while the final decision about his guilt belongs to a jury after the prosecution’s case has been fully tested. Responsible analysis should demand answers from authorities without transforming every unanswered question into proof of a vast conspiracy.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72997825</guid><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72997825/5kirktheories3.mp3" length="10722786" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f9d342d3-6fcb-444f-91f7-8afbaddbef3a/f9d342d3-6fcb-444f-91f7-8afbaddbef3a.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f9d342d3-6fcb-444f-91f7-8afbaddbef3a/f9d342d3-6fcb-444f-91f7-8afbaddbef3a.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f9d342d3-6fcb-444f-91f7-8afbaddbef3a/f9d342d3-6fcb-444f-91f7-8afbaddbef3a.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Since Charlie Kirk’s murder, five major conspiracy theories have dominated the online conversation: that Tyler Robinson was never on the Utah Valley University campus, that another shooter fired the fatal round, that police fabricated the digital and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Since Charlie Kirk’s murder, five major conspiracy theories have dominated the online conversation: that Tyler Robinson was never on the Utah Valley University campus, that another shooter fired the fatal round, that police fabricated the digital and forensic evidence, that people inside Turning Point USA helped arrange or conceal the killing, and that a foreign government ordered the assassination. Each theory begins with a real uncertainty or weakness, such as unclear surveillance footage, inconclusive ballistics, questions about digital-message authentication, inadequate event security, or Kirk’s political disagreements. The problem is that these legitimate questions are repeatedly stretched into sweeping claims that require investigators, witnesses, relatives, forensic analysts, prosecutors, political organizations, and foreign actors to participate in a coordinated deception. The publicly described evidence instead links Robinson to the campus through surveillance footage, his vehicle, DNA found on items associated with the rifle and rooftop, cellphone data, witness statements, and multiple alleged admissions. None of that proves guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, but it makes claims that Robinson was completely framed or absent from the scene extremely difficult to support.<br /><br />The strongest approach is to separate legitimate courtroom challenges from unsupported accusations. Robinson remains presumed innocent, and his defense has every right to challenge the identification evidence, DNA analysis, scene preservation, ballistics, digital extractions, witness interviews, and alleged confessions, especially in a death-penalty case. However, inconclusive bullet testing does not mean the rifle was excluded, poor security does not prove an intentional stand-down, and political disagreements do not establish that Turning Point USA, Erika Kirk, Israel, or any other foreign government arranged the murder. No credible public evidence has revealed payments, communications, handlers, operational plans, or witnesses connecting those parties to the shooting. The evidence currently points toward Robinson as the alleged gunman, while the final decision about his guilt belongs to a jury after the prosecution’s case has been fully tested. Responsible analysis should demand answers from authorities without transforming every unanswered question into proof of a vast conspiracy.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>671</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvu</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Five Alternate Theories Surrounding Charlie Kirk’s Murder (Part 2) (7/16/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-five-alternate-theories-surrounding-charlie-kirk-s-murder-part-2-7-16-26--72997823</link><description><![CDATA[Since Charlie Kirk’s murder, five major conspiracy theories have dominated the online conversation: that Tyler Robinson was never on the Utah Valley University campus, that another shooter fired the fatal round, that police fabricated the digital and forensic evidence, that people inside Turning Point USA helped arrange or conceal the killing, and that a foreign government ordered the assassination. Each theory begins with a real uncertainty or weakness, such as unclear surveillance footage, inconclusive ballistics, questions about digital-message authentication, inadequate event security, or Kirk’s political disagreements. The problem is that these legitimate questions are repeatedly stretched into sweeping claims that require investigators, witnesses, relatives, forensic analysts, prosecutors, political organizations, and foreign actors to participate in a coordinated deception. The publicly described evidence instead links Robinson to the campus through surveillance footage, his vehicle, DNA found on items associated with the rifle and rooftop, cellphone data, witness statements, and multiple alleged admissions. None of that proves guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, but it makes claims that Robinson was completely framed or absent from the scene extremely difficult to support.<br /><br />The strongest approach is to separate legitimate courtroom challenges from unsupported accusations. Robinson remains presumed innocent, and his defense has every right to challenge the identification evidence, DNA analysis, scene preservation, ballistics, digital extractions, witness interviews, and alleged confessions, especially in a death-penalty case. However, inconclusive bullet testing does not mean the rifle was excluded, poor security does not prove an intentional stand-down, and political disagreements do not establish that Turning Point USA, Erika Kirk, Israel, or any other foreign government arranged the murder. No credible public evidence has revealed payments, communications, handlers, operational plans, or witnesses connecting those parties to the shooting. The evidence currently points toward Robinson as the alleged gunman, while the final decision about his guilt belongs to a jury after the prosecution’s case has been fully tested. Responsible analysis should demand answers from authorities without transforming every unanswered question into proof of a vast conspiracy.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72997823</guid><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 18:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72997823/5kirktheories2.mp3" length="14594342" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e39f4723-d5f2-48bc-b38a-dcea8bee9293/e39f4723-d5f2-48bc-b38a-dcea8bee9293.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e39f4723-d5f2-48bc-b38a-dcea8bee9293/e39f4723-d5f2-48bc-b38a-dcea8bee9293.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e39f4723-d5f2-48bc-b38a-dcea8bee9293/e39f4723-d5f2-48bc-b38a-dcea8bee9293.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Since Charlie Kirk’s murder, five major conspiracy theories have dominated the online conversation: that Tyler Robinson was never on the Utah Valley University campus, that another shooter fired the fatal round, that police fabricated the digital and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Since Charlie Kirk’s murder, five major conspiracy theories have dominated the online conversation: that Tyler Robinson was never on the Utah Valley University campus, that another shooter fired the fatal round, that police fabricated the digital and forensic evidence, that people inside Turning Point USA helped arrange or conceal the killing, and that a foreign government ordered the assassination. Each theory begins with a real uncertainty or weakness, such as unclear surveillance footage, inconclusive ballistics, questions about digital-message authentication, inadequate event security, or Kirk’s political disagreements. The problem is that these legitimate questions are repeatedly stretched into sweeping claims that require investigators, witnesses, relatives, forensic analysts, prosecutors, political organizations, and foreign actors to participate in a coordinated deception. The publicly described evidence instead links Robinson to the campus through surveillance footage, his vehicle, DNA found on items associated with the rifle and rooftop, cellphone data, witness statements, and multiple alleged admissions. None of that proves guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, but it makes claims that Robinson was completely framed or absent from the scene extremely difficult to support.<br /><br />The strongest approach is to separate legitimate courtroom challenges from unsupported accusations. Robinson remains presumed innocent, and his defense has every right to challenge the identification evidence, DNA analysis, scene preservation, ballistics, digital extractions, witness interviews, and alleged confessions, especially in a death-penalty case. However, inconclusive bullet testing does not mean the rifle was excluded, poor security does not prove an intentional stand-down, and political disagreements do not establish that Turning Point USA, Erika Kirk, Israel, or any other foreign government arranged the murder. No credible public evidence has revealed payments, communications, handlers, operational plans, or witnesses connecting those parties to the shooting. The evidence currently points toward Robinson as the alleged gunman, while the final decision about his guilt belongs to a jury after the prosecution’s case has been fully tested. Responsible analysis should demand answers from authorities without transforming every unanswered question into proof of a vast conspiracy.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>913</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvu</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Five Alternate Theories Surrounding Charlie Kirk’s Murder (Part 1) (7/16/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-five-alternate-theories-surrounding-charlie-kirk-s-murder-part-1-7-16-26--72997822</link><description><![CDATA[Since Charlie Kirk’s murder, five major conspiracy theories have dominated the online conversation: that Tyler Robinson was never on the Utah Valley University campus, that another shooter fired the fatal round, that police fabricated the digital and forensic evidence, that people inside Turning Point USA helped arrange or conceal the killing, and that a foreign government ordered the assassination. Each theory begins with a real uncertainty or weakness, such as unclear surveillance footage, inconclusive ballistics, questions about digital-message authentication, inadequate event security, or Kirk’s political disagreements. The problem is that these legitimate questions are repeatedly stretched into sweeping claims that require investigators, witnesses, relatives, forensic analysts, prosecutors, political organizations, and foreign actors to participate in a coordinated deception. The publicly described evidence instead links Robinson to the campus through surveillance footage, his vehicle, DNA found on items associated with the rifle and rooftop, cellphone data, witness statements, and multiple alleged admissions. None of that proves guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, but it makes claims that Robinson was completely framed or absent from the scene extremely difficult to support.<br /><br />The strongest approach is to separate legitimate courtroom challenges from unsupported accusations. Robinson remains presumed innocent, and his defense has every right to challenge the identification evidence, DNA analysis, scene preservation, ballistics, digital extractions, witness interviews, and alleged confessions, especially in a death-penalty case. However, inconclusive bullet testing does not mean the rifle was excluded, poor security does not prove an intentional stand-down, and political disagreements do not establish that Turning Point USA, Erika Kirk, Israel, or any other foreign government arranged the murder. No credible public evidence has revealed payments, communications, handlers, operational plans, or witnesses connecting those parties to the shooting. The evidence currently points toward Robinson as the alleged gunman, while the final decision about his guilt belongs to a jury after the prosecution’s case has been fully tested. Responsible analysis should demand answers from authorities without transforming every unanswered question into proof of a vast conspiracy.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72997822</guid><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72997822/5kirktheories1.mp3" length="17653804" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ef4ebbfc-e489-4467-8d80-deceae06048b/ef4ebbfc-e489-4467-8d80-deceae06048b.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ef4ebbfc-e489-4467-8d80-deceae06048b/ef4ebbfc-e489-4467-8d80-deceae06048b.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ef4ebbfc-e489-4467-8d80-deceae06048b/ef4ebbfc-e489-4467-8d80-deceae06048b.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Since Charlie Kirk’s murder, five major conspiracy theories have dominated the online conversation: that Tyler Robinson was never on the Utah Valley University campus, that another shooter fired the fatal round, that police fabricated the digital and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Since Charlie Kirk’s murder, five major conspiracy theories have dominated the online conversation: that Tyler Robinson was never on the Utah Valley University campus, that another shooter fired the fatal round, that police fabricated the digital and forensic evidence, that people inside Turning Point USA helped arrange or conceal the killing, and that a foreign government ordered the assassination. Each theory begins with a real uncertainty or weakness, such as unclear surveillance footage, inconclusive ballistics, questions about digital-message authentication, inadequate event security, or Kirk’s political disagreements. The problem is that these legitimate questions are repeatedly stretched into sweeping claims that require investigators, witnesses, relatives, forensic analysts, prosecutors, political organizations, and foreign actors to participate in a coordinated deception. The publicly described evidence instead links Robinson to the campus through surveillance footage, his vehicle, DNA found on items associated with the rifle and rooftop, cellphone data, witness statements, and multiple alleged admissions. None of that proves guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, but it makes claims that Robinson was completely framed or absent from the scene extremely difficult to support.<br /><br />The strongest approach is to separate legitimate courtroom challenges from unsupported accusations. Robinson remains presumed innocent, and his defense has every right to challenge the identification evidence, DNA analysis, scene preservation, ballistics, digital extractions, witness interviews, and alleged confessions, especially in a death-penalty case. However, inconclusive bullet testing does not mean the rifle was excluded, poor security does not prove an intentional stand-down, and political disagreements do not establish that Turning Point USA, Erika Kirk, Israel, or any other foreign government arranged the murder. No credible public evidence has revealed payments, communications, handlers, operational plans, or witnesses connecting those parties to the shooting. The evidence currently points toward Robinson as the alleged gunman, while the final decision about his guilt belongs to a jury after the prosecution’s case has been fully tested. Responsible analysis should demand answers from authorities without transforming every unanswered question into proof of a vast conspiracy.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1104</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvu</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Warren Buffet Makes A Final Decision On Donations to The Gates Foundation (7/16/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/warren-buffet-makes-a-final-decision-on-donations-to-the-gates-foundation-7-16-26--72997826</link><description><![CDATA[Warren Buffett left the Gates Foundation out of his annual charitable donations for the first time, directing roughly $6 billion in Berkshire Hathaway stock instead to four foundations connected to his family. The omission followed renewed disclosures about Bill Gates’ meetings and correspondence with Jeffrey Epstein. Buffett also accelerated his broader estate plans, announcing that his remaining Berkshire shares, valued at nearly $146 billion, will be donated to those four foundations by December 31, 2034. The Gates Foundation has received most of Buffett’s previous charitable giving, totaling more than $61 billion since 2006.<br /><br />Buffett and Gates were once exceptionally close, but Buffett said they had not spoken for months following the release of additional Epstein-related documents in late 2025. Gates has denied knowing about Epstein’s crimes and has not been accused of wrongdoing, maintaining that he met Epstein because he believed the financier could help raise money for charitable projects. The Gates Foundation has hired an outside reviewer to examine its past engagement with Epstein and its procedures for vetting potential partners. Buffett declined to directly judge Gates’ conduct, but said he wanted to avoid involvement in anything that might later become the subject of an investigation.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://abcnews.com/Business/wireStory/warren-buffett-omits-annual-donation-bill-gates-foundation-134747146" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Warren Buffett omits annual donation to Bill Gates’ foundation after his Epstein ties were disclosed - ABC News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72997826</guid><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72997826/buffetendsdonationsgates.mp3" length="12641219" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0b2554a8-6cc1-4b23-855f-0a72c8ed1dfe/0b2554a8-6cc1-4b23-855f-0a72c8ed1dfe.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0b2554a8-6cc1-4b23-855f-0a72c8ed1dfe/0b2554a8-6cc1-4b23-855f-0a72c8ed1dfe.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0b2554a8-6cc1-4b23-855f-0a72c8ed1dfe/0b2554a8-6cc1-4b23-855f-0a72c8ed1dfe.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Warren Buffett left the Gates Foundation out of his annual charitable donations for the first time, directing roughly $6 billion in Berkshire Hathaway stock instead to four foundations connected to his family. The omission followed renewed disclosures...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Warren Buffett left the Gates Foundation out of his annual charitable donations for the first time, directing roughly $6 billion in Berkshire Hathaway stock instead to four foundations connected to his family. The omission followed renewed disclosures about Bill Gates’ meetings and correspondence with Jeffrey Epstein. Buffett also accelerated his broader estate plans, announcing that his remaining Berkshire shares, valued at nearly $146 billion, will be donated to those four foundations by December 31, 2034. The Gates Foundation has received most of Buffett’s previous charitable giving, totaling more than $61 billion since 2006.<br /><br />Buffett and Gates were once exceptionally close, but Buffett said they had not spoken for months following the release of additional Epstein-related documents in late 2025. Gates has denied knowing about Epstein’s crimes and has not been accused of wrongdoing, maintaining that he met Epstein because he believed the financier could help raise money for charitable projects. The Gates Foundation has hired an outside reviewer to examine its past engagement with Epstein and its procedures for vetting potential partners. Buffett declined to directly judge Gates’ conduct, but said he wanted to avoid involvement in anything that might later become the subject of an investigation.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://abcnews.com/Business/wireStory/warren-buffett-omits-annual-donation-bill-gates-foundation-134747146" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Warren Buffett omits annual donation to Bill Gates’ foundation after his Epstein ties were disclosed - ABC News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>791</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>JPMorgan, Jamie Diamond, Jeffrey Epstein and the Battle Over Britain’s Banker Tax (7/16/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/jpmorgan-jamie-diamond-jeffrey-epstein-and-the-battle-over-britain-s-banker-tax-7-16-26--72997824</link><description><![CDATA[Senator Elizabeth Warren is demanding answers from JPMorgan chief executive Jamie Dimon about whether he acted on advice connected to Jeffrey Epstein while lobbying against a proposed British tax on bankers’ bonuses. Warren’s questions follow the release of a 2009 email exchange in which Epstein asked then-Labour minister Peter Mandelson whether Dimon should pressure UK chancellor Alistair Darling over the tax. Mandelson reportedly replied that Dimon should “mildly threaten” Darling, and Dimon later warned that JPMorgan could reconsider investments in Britain, including plans for a new London headquarters. Warren said the communications raise serious questions about the extent of JPMorgan’s relationship with Epstein and what Dimon<br /><br />Dimon testified in 2023 that he had never met Epstein and had not heard his name until Epstein’s 2019 arrest. JPMorgan continues to insist that Dimon never communicated with Epstein, never sought his advice and was not involved in decisions involving Epstein’s accounts. The bank has also rejected former executive Jes Staley’s claim that he discussed Epstein with Dimon, describing Staley’s testimony as unreliable. JPMorgan acknowledged that maintaining Epstein as a client was a mistake but said the bank ended the relationship in 2013 and would have acted sooner had it known he was continuing to commit crimes. Warren is now seeking a fuller accounting of whether Dimon’s lobbying efforts were influenced, directly or indirectly, by Epstein and his political connections.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/business/2026/jul/13/jp-morgan-boss-jamie-dimon-us-uk-jeffrey-epstein-elizabeth-warren" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">JP Morgan boss pressed by US senator about contact with Jeffrey Epstein | JP Morgan | The Guardian</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72997824</guid><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72997824/dimongrilledbywarren.mp3" length="11090173" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/55e25462-53c5-4269-ae68-017b886a2fa1/55e25462-53c5-4269-ae68-017b886a2fa1.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/55e25462-53c5-4269-ae68-017b886a2fa1/55e25462-53c5-4269-ae68-017b886a2fa1.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/55e25462-53c5-4269-ae68-017b886a2fa1/55e25462-53c5-4269-ae68-017b886a2fa1.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Senator Elizabeth Warren is demanding answers from JPMorgan chief executive Jamie Dimon about whether he acted on advice connected to Jeffrey Epstein while lobbying against a proposed British tax on bankers’ bonuses. Warren’s questions follow the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Senator Elizabeth Warren is demanding answers from JPMorgan chief executive Jamie Dimon about whether he acted on advice connected to Jeffrey Epstein while lobbying against a proposed British tax on bankers’ bonuses. Warren’s questions follow the release of a 2009 email exchange in which Epstein asked then-Labour minister Peter Mandelson whether Dimon should pressure UK chancellor Alistair Darling over the tax. Mandelson reportedly replied that Dimon should “mildly threaten” Darling, and Dimon later warned that JPMorgan could reconsider investments in Britain, including plans for a new London headquarters. Warren said the communications raise serious questions about the extent of JPMorgan’s relationship with Epstein and what Dimon<br /><br />Dimon testified in 2023 that he had never met Epstein and had not heard his name until Epstein’s 2019 arrest. JPMorgan continues to insist that Dimon never communicated with Epstein, never sought his advice and was not involved in decisions involving Epstein’s accounts. The bank has also rejected former executive Jes Staley’s claim that he discussed Epstein with Dimon, describing Staley’s testimony as unreliable. JPMorgan acknowledged that maintaining Epstein as a client was a mistake but said the bank ended the relationship in 2013 and would have acted sooner had it known he was continuing to commit crimes. Warren is now seeking a fuller accounting of whether Dimon’s lobbying efforts were influenced, directly or indirectly, by Epstein and his political connections.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/business/2026/jul/13/jp-morgan-boss-jamie-dimon-us-uk-jeffrey-epstein-elizabeth-warren" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">JP Morgan boss pressed by US senator about contact with Jeffrey Epstein | JP Morgan | The Guardian</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>694</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   A Look Back At The Ghislaine Maxwell Trial (Part 3) (7/16/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-a-look-back-at-the-ghislaine-maxwell-trial-part-3-7-16-26--72995504</link><description><![CDATA[This episode takes a flashback look at some of the biggest moments from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, revisiting the testimony, courtroom exchanges, and key developments that stood out as the case unfolded. Rather than retelling the entire trial from beginning to end, the episode returns to selected highlights that captured the weight of the proceedings and helped shape the public’s understanding of Maxwell’s role in Jeffrey Epstein’s operation.<br /><br />From powerful witness testimony to pivotal moments involving the prosecution and defense, these clips offer a snapshot of one of the most closely watched trials connected to the Epstein scandal. The episode is a look back at the moments that defined the courtroom drama, exposed important details, and ultimately contributed to Maxwell’s conviction.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72995504</guid><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 10:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72995504/288be728_b120_4633_a9b0_b4658af97fe4.mp3" length="66584285" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c579c1ec-9900-4e86-8e88-fb4bf0bda0bd/c579c1ec-9900-4e86-8e88-fb4bf0bda0bd.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c579c1ec-9900-4e86-8e88-fb4bf0bda0bd/c579c1ec-9900-4e86-8e88-fb4bf0bda0bd.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c579c1ec-9900-4e86-8e88-fb4bf0bda0bd/c579c1ec-9900-4e86-8e88-fb4bf0bda0bd.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>This episode takes a flashback look at some of the biggest moments from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, revisiting the testimony, courtroom exchanges, and key developments that stood out as the case unfolded. Rather than retelling the entire trial from...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[This episode takes a flashback look at some of the biggest moments from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, revisiting the testimony, courtroom exchanges, and key developments that stood out as the case unfolded. Rather than retelling the entire trial from beginning to end, the episode returns to selected highlights that captured the weight of the proceedings and helped shape the public’s understanding of Maxwell’s role in Jeffrey Epstein’s operation.<br /><br />From powerful witness testimony to pivotal moments involving the prosecution and defense, these clips offer a snapshot of one of the most closely watched trials connected to the Epstein scandal. The episode is a look back at the moments that defined the courtroom drama, exposed important details, and ultimately contributed to Maxwell’s conviction.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4162</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   A Look Back At The Ghislaine Maxwell Trial (Part 2) (7/16/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-a-look-back-at-the-ghislaine-maxwell-trial-part-2-7-16-26--72995502</link><description><![CDATA[This episode takes a flashback look at some of the biggest moments from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, revisiting the testimony, courtroom exchanges, and key developments that stood out as the case unfolded. Rather than retelling the entire trial from beginning to end, the episode returns to selected highlights that captured the weight of the proceedings and helped shape the public’s understanding of Maxwell’s role in Jeffrey Epstein’s operation.<br /><br />From powerful witness testimony to pivotal moments involving the prosecution and defense, these clips offer a snapshot of one of the most closely watched trials connected to the Epstein scandal. The episode is a look back at the moments that defined the courtroom drama, exposed important details, and ultimately contributed to Maxwell’s conviction.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72995502</guid><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72995502/548212a2_36ed_4002_a503_839cc5d6d893.mp3" length="60466617" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/559e9645-c303-4380-b186-d9ad060323e4/559e9645-c303-4380-b186-d9ad060323e4.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/559e9645-c303-4380-b186-d9ad060323e4/559e9645-c303-4380-b186-d9ad060323e4.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/559e9645-c303-4380-b186-d9ad060323e4/559e9645-c303-4380-b186-d9ad060323e4.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>This episode takes a flashback look at some of the biggest moments from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, revisiting the testimony, courtroom exchanges, and key developments that stood out as the case unfolded. Rather than retelling the entire trial from...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[This episode takes a flashback look at some of the biggest moments from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, revisiting the testimony, courtroom exchanges, and key developments that stood out as the case unfolded. Rather than retelling the entire trial from beginning to end, the episode returns to selected highlights that captured the weight of the proceedings and helped shape the public’s understanding of Maxwell’s role in Jeffrey Epstein’s operation.<br /><br />From powerful witness testimony to pivotal moments involving the prosecution and defense, these clips offer a snapshot of one of the most closely watched trials connected to the Epstein scandal. The episode is a look back at the moments that defined the courtroom drama, exposed important details, and ultimately contributed to Maxwell’s conviction.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3780</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   A Look Back At The Ghislaine Maxwell Trial (Part 1) (7/15/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-a-look-back-at-the-ghislaine-maxwell-trial-part-1-7-15-26--72995503</link><description><![CDATA[This episode takes a flashback look at some of the biggest moments from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, revisiting the testimony, courtroom exchanges, and key developments that stood out as the case unfolded. Rather than retelling the entire trial from beginning to end, the episode returns to selected highlights that captured the weight of the proceedings and helped shape the public’s understanding of Maxwell’s role in Jeffrey Epstein’s operation.<br /><br />From powerful witness testimony to pivotal moments involving the prosecution and defense, these clips offer a snapshot of one of the most closely watched trials connected to the Epstein scandal. The episode is a look back at the moments that defined the courtroom drama, exposed important details, and ultimately contributed to Maxwell’s conviction.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72995503</guid><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72995503/d99b53a1_b2f0_4695_8266_0d1fab136a0a.mp3" length="63366417" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d662d015-e268-4526-8260-afca3369c153/d662d015-e268-4526-8260-afca3369c153.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d662d015-e268-4526-8260-afca3369c153/d662d015-e268-4526-8260-afca3369c153.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d662d015-e268-4526-8260-afca3369c153/d662d015-e268-4526-8260-afca3369c153.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>This episode takes a flashback look at some of the biggest moments from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, revisiting the testimony, courtroom exchanges, and key developments that stood out as the case unfolded. Rather than retelling the entire trial from...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[This episode takes a flashback look at some of the biggest moments from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, revisiting the testimony, courtroom exchanges, and key developments that stood out as the case unfolded. Rather than retelling the entire trial from beginning to end, the episode returns to selected highlights that captured the weight of the proceedings and helped shape the public’s understanding of Maxwell’s role in Jeffrey Epstein’s operation.<br /><br />From powerful witness testimony to pivotal moments involving the prosecution and defense, these clips offer a snapshot of one of the most closely watched trials connected to the Epstein scandal. The episode is a look back at the moments that defined the courtroom drama, exposed important details, and ultimately contributed to Maxwell’s conviction.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3961</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Epstein Fallout Hits Dartmouth: Students Demand Leon Black’s Name Be Removed</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-epstein-fallout-hits-dartmouth-students-demand-leon-black-s-name-be-removed--72995995</link><description><![CDATA[The controversy centers on growing pressure at Dartmouth College to remove the name of billionaire donor Leon Black from its visual arts center due to his financial ties to Jeffrey Epstein. A broad coalition of students, faculty, and community members has renewed calls for the change, arguing that Black’s reported payments—totaling around $170 million—to Epstein after his 2008 conviction make his continued honor on campus unacceptable. Critics say the institution has had years to act and that continuing to keep his name on the building reflects a failure to reckon with the implications of those ties.<br /><br />In response, Dartmouth’s leadership has opted not to immediately remove the name but instead to form a committee to review naming policies across campus, a move that critics see as a delay tactic rather than meaningful action. The situation highlights a broader institutional dilemma: universities grappling with large donor contributions tied to controversial figures, where legal agreements and financial considerations complicate swift decisions. For many pushing for change, the issue goes beyond one building, reflecting a deeper tension between financial dependence on donors and the ethical responsibility to address associations with Epstein’s network.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://vnews.com/2026/04/20/epstein-black-dartmouth-controversy/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Calls grow to rename Dartmouth building bankrolled by Epstein associate - Valley News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72995995</guid><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72995995/darthmouthblackblowback.mp3" length="17749098" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/fc39aa89-577a-48bc-a0a5-01c2ee518db0/fc39aa89-577a-48bc-a0a5-01c2ee518db0.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/fc39aa89-577a-48bc-a0a5-01c2ee518db0/fc39aa89-577a-48bc-a0a5-01c2ee518db0.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/fc39aa89-577a-48bc-a0a5-01c2ee518db0/fc39aa89-577a-48bc-a0a5-01c2ee518db0.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The controversy centers on growing pressure at Dartmouth College to remove the name of billionaire donor Leon Black from its visual arts center due to his financial ties to Jeffrey Epstein. A broad coalition of students, faculty, and community members...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The controversy centers on growing pressure at Dartmouth College to remove the name of billionaire donor Leon Black from its visual arts center due to his financial ties to Jeffrey Epstein. A broad coalition of students, faculty, and community members has renewed calls for the change, arguing that Black’s reported payments—totaling around $170 million—to Epstein after his 2008 conviction make his continued honor on campus unacceptable. Critics say the institution has had years to act and that continuing to keep his name on the building reflects a failure to reckon with the implications of those ties.<br /><br />In response, Dartmouth’s leadership has opted not to immediately remove the name but instead to form a committee to review naming policies across campus, a move that critics see as a delay tactic rather than meaningful action. The situation highlights a broader institutional dilemma: universities grappling with large donor contributions tied to controversial figures, where legal agreements and financial considerations complicate swift decisions. For many pushing for change, the issue goes beyond one building, reflecting a deeper tension between financial dependence on donors and the ethical responsibility to address associations with Epstein’s network.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://vnews.com/2026/04/20/epstein-black-dartmouth-controversy/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Calls grow to rename Dartmouth building bankrolled by Epstein associate - Valley News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1110</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Virginia Roberts Deposition That Helped Expose Epstein And Maxwell (Part 18)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-virginia-roberts-deposition-that-helped-expose-epstein-and-maxwell-part-18--72930318</link><description><![CDATA[In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.<br /><br />Giuffre’s deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell’s direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein’s residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein’s private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell’s London townhouse, and at Epstein’s New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell’s role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell’s 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me;<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.appealslawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/1090-32.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1090-32.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72930318</guid><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72930318/vrobdepo18.mp3" length="21964634" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1b21e425-1773-483f-b034-04c4045aedde/1b21e425-1773-483f-b034-04c4045aedde.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1b21e425-1773-483f-b034-04c4045aedde/1b21e425-1773-483f-b034-04c4045aedde.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1b21e425-1773-483f-b034-04c4045aedde/1b21e425-1773-483f-b034-04c4045aedde.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.<br /><br />Giuffre’s deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell’s direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein’s residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein’s private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell’s London townhouse, and at Epstein’s New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell’s role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell’s 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me;<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.appealslawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/1090-32.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1090-32.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1373</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Virginia Roberts Deposition That Helped Expose Epstein And Maxwell (Part 17)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-virginia-roberts-deposition-that-helped-expose-epstein-and-maxwell-part-17--72930313</link><description><![CDATA[In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.<br /><br />Giuffre’s deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell’s direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein’s residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein’s private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell’s London townhouse, and at Epstein’s New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell’s role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell’s 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me;<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.appealslawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/1090-32.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1090-32.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72930313</guid><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72930313/vrobdepo17.mp3" length="15706531" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/bf8897c9-88ed-4ebe-a22d-8f3bbb73ba9f/bf8897c9-88ed-4ebe-a22d-8f3bbb73ba9f.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/bf8897c9-88ed-4ebe-a22d-8f3bbb73ba9f/bf8897c9-88ed-4ebe-a22d-8f3bbb73ba9f.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/bf8897c9-88ed-4ebe-a22d-8f3bbb73ba9f/bf8897c9-88ed-4ebe-a22d-8f3bbb73ba9f.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.<br /><br />Giuffre’s deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell’s direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein’s residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein’s private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell’s London townhouse, and at Epstein’s New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell’s role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell’s 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me;<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.appealslawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/1090-32.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1090-32.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>982</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Virginia Roberts Deposition That Helped Expose Epstein And Maxwell (Part 16)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-virginia-roberts-deposition-that-helped-expose-epstein-and-maxwell-part-16--72930327</link><description><![CDATA[In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.<br /><br />Giuffre’s deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell’s direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein’s residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein’s private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell’s London townhouse, and at Epstein’s New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell’s role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell’s 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me;<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.appealslawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/1090-32.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1090-32.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72930327</guid><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72930327/vrobdepo16.mp3" length="16356039" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/788d8ed6-b096-475f-b138-8840d736679e/788d8ed6-b096-475f-b138-8840d736679e.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/788d8ed6-b096-475f-b138-8840d736679e/788d8ed6-b096-475f-b138-8840d736679e.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/788d8ed6-b096-475f-b138-8840d736679e/788d8ed6-b096-475f-b138-8840d736679e.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.<br /><br />Giuffre’s deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell’s direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein’s residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein’s private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell’s London townhouse, and at Epstein’s New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell’s role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell’s 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me;<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.appealslawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/1090-32.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1090-32.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1023</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Kohberger Playbook: Is Tyler Robinson Following the Same Path? (Part 2) (7/15/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-kohberger-playbook-is-tyler-robinson-following-the-same-path-part-2-7-15-26--72977393</link><description><![CDATA[The Tyler Robinson defense is following a familiar capital-case strategy: challenge the evidence, contest deadlines, file repeated motions, preserve every possible appellate issue, and force the prosecution to defend each stage of its case. That approach closely resembles the strategy used by Bryan Kohberger’s attorneys before he ultimately pleaded guilty in exchange for the removal of the death penalty. Although the constant delays and procedural battles are understandably frustrating, particularly for Charlie Kirk’s family and supporters, they are part of the reality of a case in which the government is seeking the ultimate punishment.<br /><br />The Robinson case is unlikely to move quickly or in a straight line. His attorneys are attempting to weaken the prosecution’s evidence, protect his constitutional rights, create leverage for a possible resolution, and save him from execution. Meanwhile, prosecutors must answer each challenge carefully because a major mistake could jeopardize a conviction or sentence years later. Eventually the motions and delays will end, but until then, the slow and repetitive legal grind should not be viewed as separate from the case. In a capital murder prosecution, that grind is the case.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72977393</guid><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72977393/robinsonkohberger2.mp3" length="14537500" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/27bd3bf9-7597-4cf8-9541-b1364b81137b/27bd3bf9-7597-4cf8-9541-b1364b81137b.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/27bd3bf9-7597-4cf8-9541-b1364b81137b/27bd3bf9-7597-4cf8-9541-b1364b81137b.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/27bd3bf9-7597-4cf8-9541-b1364b81137b/27bd3bf9-7597-4cf8-9541-b1364b81137b.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Tyler Robinson defense is following a familiar capital-case strategy: challenge the evidence, contest deadlines, file repeated motions, preserve every possible appellate issue, and force the prosecution to defend each stage of its case. That...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Tyler Robinson defense is following a familiar capital-case strategy: challenge the evidence, contest deadlines, file repeated motions, preserve every possible appellate issue, and force the prosecution to defend each stage of its case. That approach closely resembles the strategy used by Bryan Kohberger’s attorneys before he ultimately pleaded guilty in exchange for the removal of the death penalty. Although the constant delays and procedural battles are understandably frustrating, particularly for Charlie Kirk’s family and supporters, they are part of the reality of a case in which the government is seeking the ultimate punishment.<br /><br />The Robinson case is unlikely to move quickly or in a straight line. His attorneys are attempting to weaken the prosecution’s evidence, protect his constitutional rights, create leverage for a possible resolution, and save him from execution. Meanwhile, prosecutors must answer each challenge carefully because a major mistake could jeopardize a conviction or sentence years later. Eventually the motions and delays will end, but until then, the slow and repetitive legal grind should not be viewed as separate from the case. In a capital murder prosecution, that grind is the case.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>909</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Kohberger Playbook: Is Tyler Robinson Following the Same Path? (Part 1) (7/14/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-kohberger-playbook-is-tyler-robinson-following-the-same-path-part-1-7-14-26--72977395</link><description><![CDATA[The Tyler Robinson defense is following a familiar capital-case strategy: challenge the evidence, contest deadlines, file repeated motions, preserve every possible appellate issue, and force the prosecution to defend each stage of its case. That approach closely resembles the strategy used by Bryan Kohberger’s attorneys before he ultimately pleaded guilty in exchange for the removal of the death penalty. Although the constant delays and procedural battles are understandably frustrating, particularly for Charlie Kirk’s family and supporters, they are part of the reality of a case in which the government is seeking the ultimate punishment.<br /><br />The Robinson case is unlikely to move quickly or in a straight line. His attorneys are attempting to weaken the prosecution’s evidence, protect his constitutional rights, create leverage for a possible resolution, and save him from execution. Meanwhile, prosecutors must answer each challenge carefully because a major mistake could jeopardize a conviction or sentence years later. Eventually the motions and delays will end, but until then, the slow and repetitive legal grind should not be viewed as separate from the case. In a capital murder prosecution, that grind is the case.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72977395</guid><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 18:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72977395/robinsonkohberger1.mp3" length="14395394" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/641b74cd-7055-40de-b838-6096f67b3166/641b74cd-7055-40de-b838-6096f67b3166.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/641b74cd-7055-40de-b838-6096f67b3166/641b74cd-7055-40de-b838-6096f67b3166.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/641b74cd-7055-40de-b838-6096f67b3166/641b74cd-7055-40de-b838-6096f67b3166.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Tyler Robinson defense is following a familiar capital-case strategy: challenge the evidence, contest deadlines, file repeated motions, preserve every possible appellate issue, and force the prosecution to defend each stage of its case. That...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Tyler Robinson defense is following a familiar capital-case strategy: challenge the evidence, contest deadlines, file repeated motions, preserve every possible appellate issue, and force the prosecution to defend each stage of its case. That approach closely resembles the strategy used by Bryan Kohberger’s attorneys before he ultimately pleaded guilty in exchange for the removal of the death penalty. Although the constant delays and procedural battles are understandably frustrating, particularly for Charlie Kirk’s family and supporters, they are part of the reality of a case in which the government is seeking the ultimate punishment.<br /><br />The Robinson case is unlikely to move quickly or in a straight line. His attorneys are attempting to weaken the prosecution’s evidence, protect his constitutional rights, create leverage for a possible resolution, and save him from execution. Meanwhile, prosecutors must answer each challenge carefully because a major mistake could jeopardize a conviction or sentence years later. Eventually the motions and delays will end, but until then, the slow and repetitive legal grind should not be viewed as separate from the case. In a capital murder prosecution, that grind is the case.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>900</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Epstein Records and Ehud Barak’s Inner Circle (7/15/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-epstein-records-and-ehud-barak-s-inner-circle-7-15-26--72977398</link><description><![CDATA[Newly released Justice Department records reportedly show that former Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak maintained a close, years-long relationship with Jeffrey Epstein well after Epstein’s 2008 conviction. Emails, visitor records and financial documents trace their association from roughly 2013 through 2019, including repeated stays by Barak and his wife at Epstein’s Manhattan residence, which staff allegedly referred to as “Ehud’s apartment.” The records also describe shared investments in the Israeli emergency-technology company Carbyne, funding from Epstein for Barak’s political nonprofit and private conversations in which Barak discussed Israeli politics and criticized Benjamin Netanyahu.<br /><br />The documents further indicate that Epstein acted as a political and financial connector for Barak, arranging introductions, following consultancy deals involving prominent international figures and assisting people within Barak’s inner circle. Israeli security personnel were reportedly placed inside Epstein’s residence to protect Barak during his visits, underscoring how closely his official status became intertwined with Epstein’s private world. Barak has said he never witnessed or participated in misconduct, has not been accused of sexual wrongdoing and acknowledges that his judgment in continuing the relationship deserves scrutiny. The disclosures nonetheless deepen questions about why Barak remained so closely connected to Epstein for years after his criminal conviction and what additional information may remain hidden in still-redacted federal records.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://easternherald.com/2026/07/13/ehud-barak-epstein-files-israel-prime-minister-connections-2026/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ehud Barak and the Epstein Files: What the Documents Reveal</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72977398</guid><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72977398/2ae8a759_6c44_4d31_83f2_19c97185d93a.mp3" length="10365013" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6ac4455f-881c-4ade-98c3-d8d65457a5ab/6ac4455f-881c-4ade-98c3-d8d65457a5ab.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6ac4455f-881c-4ade-98c3-d8d65457a5ab/6ac4455f-881c-4ade-98c3-d8d65457a5ab.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6ac4455f-881c-4ade-98c3-d8d65457a5ab/6ac4455f-881c-4ade-98c3-d8d65457a5ab.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Newly released Justice Department records reportedly show that former Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak maintained a close, years-long relationship with Jeffrey Epstein well after Epstein’s 2008 conviction. Emails, visitor records and financial...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Newly released Justice Department records reportedly show that former Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak maintained a close, years-long relationship with Jeffrey Epstein well after Epstein’s 2008 conviction. Emails, visitor records and financial documents trace their association from roughly 2013 through 2019, including repeated stays by Barak and his wife at Epstein’s Manhattan residence, which staff allegedly referred to as “Ehud’s apartment.” The records also describe shared investments in the Israeli emergency-technology company Carbyne, funding from Epstein for Barak’s political nonprofit and private conversations in which Barak discussed Israeli politics and criticized Benjamin Netanyahu.<br /><br />The documents further indicate that Epstein acted as a political and financial connector for Barak, arranging introductions, following consultancy deals involving prominent international figures and assisting people within Barak’s inner circle. Israeli security personnel were reportedly placed inside Epstein’s residence to protect Barak during his visits, underscoring how closely his official status became intertwined with Epstein’s private world. Barak has said he never witnessed or participated in misconduct, has not been accused of sexual wrongdoing and acknowledges that his judgment in continuing the relationship deserves scrutiny. The disclosures nonetheless deepen questions about why Barak remained so closely connected to Epstein for years after his criminal conviction and what additional information may remain hidden in still-redacted federal records.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://easternherald.com/2026/07/13/ehud-barak-epstein-files-israel-prime-minister-connections-2026/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ehud Barak and the Epstein Files: What the Documents Reveal</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>648</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>New Mexico Investigators Seek Prince Andrew’s Epstein Communications (7/15/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/new-mexico-investigators-seek-prince-andrew-s-epstein-communications-7-15-26--72977397</link><description><![CDATA[New Mexico prosecutors have issued evidence-preservation notices to more than two dozen technology, financial and travel companies as they investigate Jeffrey Epstein’s Zorro Ranch and attempt to secure the complete record of Prince Andrew’s communications with Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The notices reportedly cover emails, messages, travel information and other digital records held by companies including Google, WhatsApp, Yahoo, American Express and Expedia. Investigators are particularly interested in Andrew’s reported visits to the ranch, and one source said prosecutors are seeking to preserve “every message” he exchanged with Epstein before routine data-retention policies can erase potentially relevant evidence.<br /><br />The renewed inquiry has included interviews with former ranch employees about visitors, daily operations and Andrew’s alleged presence at the property, including a former worker who reportedly drove him from a local airport. Andrew has not been charged with any offense connected to the investigation and continues to deny wrongdoing or knowledge of Epstein’s crimes. However, the preservation orders represent a significant escalation because they are designed to lock down evidence that could help investigators reconstruct who visited Zorro Ranch, what communications took place and how Epstein’s wider network operated.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/prince-andrew-epstein-investigation-1808310" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">'Every Message They Exchanged': Ex-Prince Andrew's Communications With Epstein, Maxwell Locked Down by Prosecutors | IBTimes UK</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72977397</guid><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72977397/3710011f_24c1_4fa3_8f71_a04e5e7495bc.mp3" length="10520494" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/50afc213-58f7-45ad-a64e-e7fd22759e08/50afc213-58f7-45ad-a64e-e7fd22759e08.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/50afc213-58f7-45ad-a64e-e7fd22759e08/50afc213-58f7-45ad-a64e-e7fd22759e08.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/50afc213-58f7-45ad-a64e-e7fd22759e08/50afc213-58f7-45ad-a64e-e7fd22759e08.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>New Mexico prosecutors have issued evidence-preservation notices to more than two dozen technology, financial and travel companies as they investigate Jeffrey Epstein’s Zorro Ranch and attempt to secure the complete record of Prince Andrew’s...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[New Mexico prosecutors have issued evidence-preservation notices to more than two dozen technology, financial and travel companies as they investigate Jeffrey Epstein’s Zorro Ranch and attempt to secure the complete record of Prince Andrew’s communications with Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The notices reportedly cover emails, messages, travel information and other digital records held by companies including Google, WhatsApp, Yahoo, American Express and Expedia. Investigators are particularly interested in Andrew’s reported visits to the ranch, and one source said prosecutors are seeking to preserve “every message” he exchanged with Epstein before routine data-retention policies can erase potentially relevant evidence.<br /><br />The renewed inquiry has included interviews with former ranch employees about visitors, daily operations and Andrew’s alleged presence at the property, including a former worker who reportedly drove him from a local airport. Andrew has not been charged with any offense connected to the investigation and continues to deny wrongdoing or knowledge of Epstein’s crimes. However, the preservation orders represent a significant escalation because they are designed to lock down evidence that could help investigators reconstruct who visited Zorro Ranch, what communications took place and how Epstein’s wider network operated.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/prince-andrew-epstein-investigation-1808310" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">'Every Message They Exchanged': Ex-Prince Andrew's Communications With Epstein, Maxwell Locked Down by Prosecutors | IBTimes UK</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>658</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Epstein Survivors Urge Senate to Reject Todd Blanche (7/15/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/epstein-survivors-urge-senate-to-reject-todd-blanche-7-15-26--72977394</link><description><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein survivors are urging the Senate to reject acting Attorney General Todd Blanche’s nomination to lead the Justice Department permanently, arguing that his handling of the government’s Epstein document release should disqualify him. In a video released by World Without Exploitation, the women accused Blanche of failing to protect survivors after poorly redacted records exposed names and personal information, allegedly compromising their privacy, threatening their safety and forcing some of them into unwanted public advocacy. The survivors also rejected Blanche’s claim that the released material produced no viable investigative leads, arguing that the millions of published documents contain extensive information about Epstein’s associates, facilitators and broader network that still demands serious investigation.<br /><br />Survivors Liz Stein and Joanna Harrison described the release as re-traumatizing and said Blanche had demonstrated little interest in pursuing meaningful justice. Stein also criticized his prison interview with Ghislaine Maxwell, questioning why the Justice Department would rely on a convicted accomplice with a long history of dishonesty, particularly before Maxwell was transferred to a lower-security facility in Texas. Senate Judiciary Democrats have invited survivor Danielle Bensky to testify after Blanche’s confirmation hearing, with Senator Dick Durbin saying her name repeatedly appeared in released records despite her efforts to have the information redacted. The survivors’ message to senators is direct: Blanche protected the system and those surrounding Epstein rather than the people harmed by his crimes, and he should not be rewarded with control of the Justice Department.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/todd-blanche-jeffrey-epstein-survivors-b3014468.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein survivors release video urging Senate to block Trump’s AG pick over botched release of files | The Independent</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72977394</guid><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72977394/survivorssaynoblanche.mp3" length="11580439" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1993f946-7b75-497e-9ce8-414019d333d7/1993f946-7b75-497e-9ce8-414019d333d7.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1993f946-7b75-497e-9ce8-414019d333d7/1993f946-7b75-497e-9ce8-414019d333d7.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1993f946-7b75-497e-9ce8-414019d333d7/1993f946-7b75-497e-9ce8-414019d333d7.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jeffrey Epstein survivors are urging the Senate to reject acting Attorney General Todd Blanche’s nomination to lead the Justice Department permanently, arguing that his handling of the government’s Epstein document release should disqualify him. In a...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein survivors are urging the Senate to reject acting Attorney General Todd Blanche’s nomination to lead the Justice Department permanently, arguing that his handling of the government’s Epstein document release should disqualify him. In a video released by World Without Exploitation, the women accused Blanche of failing to protect survivors after poorly redacted records exposed names and personal information, allegedly compromising their privacy, threatening their safety and forcing some of them into unwanted public advocacy. The survivors also rejected Blanche’s claim that the released material produced no viable investigative leads, arguing that the millions of published documents contain extensive information about Epstein’s associates, facilitators and broader network that still demands serious investigation.<br /><br />Survivors Liz Stein and Joanna Harrison described the release as re-traumatizing and said Blanche had demonstrated little interest in pursuing meaningful justice. Stein also criticized his prison interview with Ghislaine Maxwell, questioning why the Justice Department would rely on a convicted accomplice with a long history of dishonesty, particularly before Maxwell was transferred to a lower-security facility in Texas. Senate Judiciary Democrats have invited survivor Danielle Bensky to testify after Blanche’s confirmation hearing, with Senator Dick Durbin saying her name repeatedly appeared in released records despite her efforts to have the information redacted. The survivors’ message to senators is direct: Blanche protected the system and those surrounding Epstein rather than the people harmed by his crimes, and he should not be rewarded with control of the Justice Department.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/todd-blanche-jeffrey-epstein-survivors-b3014468.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein survivors release video urging Senate to block Trump’s AG pick over botched release of files | The Independent</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>724</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   The Clown Prince Of England (7/15/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-clown-prince-of-england-7-15-26--72971569</link><description><![CDATA[Prince Andrew’s conduct has brought lasting shame upon himself by exposing a pattern of arrogance, poor judgment and refusal to accept meaningful responsibility. His friendship with Jeffrey Epstein continued long after Epstein’s criminal behavior was publicly known, and his disastrous attempts to explain that relationship only deepened the damage. Rather than showing humility, Andrew repeatedly appeared evasive, entitled and detached from the seriousness of the allegations surrounding him. The civil case brought by Virginia Giuffre, the settlement that followed and his removal from public duties transformed him from a senior royal into a symbol of privilege without accountability. His reputation was not destroyed by a single mistake, but by years of decisions that suggested he believed his status would protect him from consequences.<br /><br />The damage did not stop with Andrew because every scandal involving a senior royal inevitably reflects upon the institution that elevated and protected him. His behavior forced the Royal family to confront accusations that wealth, title and access had been placed above transparency and moral responsibility. It embarrassed Queen Elizabeth during the final years of her reign, created further strain for King Charles and undermined efforts to present the monarchy as modern, disciplined and worthy of public respect. Andrew became a burden that could not be defended, rehabilitated or easily removed, leaving the family trapped between loyalty to one of its own and the need to preserve the Crown’s credibility. In the end, he brought disgrace upon himself, but the Royal family’s long hesitation in dealing decisively with him ensured that some of that disgrace became theirs as well.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72971569</guid><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72971569/01149ccc_96f6_4391_b322_3e6a98ef40ba.mp3" length="57995224" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/33a778f0-4729-42a6-81f6-d8047aac6332/33a778f0-4729-42a6-81f6-d8047aac6332.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/33a778f0-4729-42a6-81f6-d8047aac6332/33a778f0-4729-42a6-81f6-d8047aac6332.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/33a778f0-4729-42a6-81f6-d8047aac6332/33a778f0-4729-42a6-81f6-d8047aac6332.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Prince Andrew’s conduct has brought lasting shame upon himself by exposing a pattern of arrogance, poor judgment and refusal to accept meaningful responsibility. His friendship with Jeffrey Epstein continued long after Epstein’s criminal behavior was...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Prince Andrew’s conduct has brought lasting shame upon himself by exposing a pattern of arrogance, poor judgment and refusal to accept meaningful responsibility. His friendship with Jeffrey Epstein continued long after Epstein’s criminal behavior was publicly known, and his disastrous attempts to explain that relationship only deepened the damage. Rather than showing humility, Andrew repeatedly appeared evasive, entitled and detached from the seriousness of the allegations surrounding him. The civil case brought by Virginia Giuffre, the settlement that followed and his removal from public duties transformed him from a senior royal into a symbol of privilege without accountability. His reputation was not destroyed by a single mistake, but by years of decisions that suggested he believed his status would protect him from consequences.<br /><br />The damage did not stop with Andrew because every scandal involving a senior royal inevitably reflects upon the institution that elevated and protected him. His behavior forced the Royal family to confront accusations that wealth, title and access had been placed above transparency and moral responsibility. It embarrassed Queen Elizabeth during the final years of her reign, created further strain for King Charles and undermined efforts to present the monarchy as modern, disciplined and worthy of public respect. Andrew became a burden that could not be defended, rehabilitated or easily removed, leaving the family trapped between loyalty to one of its own and the need to preserve the Crown’s credibility. In the end, he brought disgrace upon himself, but the Royal family’s long hesitation in dealing decisively with him ensured that some of that disgrace became theirs as well.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3625</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   The CVRA Was Meant To Protect Survivors.   It Did The Opposite.  (7/15/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-cvra-was-meant-to-protect-survivors-it-did-the-opposite-7-15-26--72971568</link><description><![CDATA[The Crime Victims’ Rights Act was supposed to guarantee victims notice, dignity, participation and the right to be heard, yet those protections were repeatedly cast aside throughout the Epstein case. Federal prosecutors negotiated the 2007 non-prosecution agreement in secret, concealed it from the girls Epstein abused and allowed Epstein and his alleged co-conspirators to receive extraordinary protections without the victims having any meaningful opportunity to object. The victims were misled about the status of the investigation while the government quietly finalized a deal that prevented federal prosecution and helped Epstein secure an exceptionally lenient state sentence. By the time the truth emerged, the agreement had already been executed, leaving the victims to fight for years merely to establish that the government had denied them the basic rights Congress had promised.<br /><br />The violations did not end with the original agreement because the victims have repeatedly been forced to battle the same institutions that failed them in the first place. They have faced delays, secrecy, withheld records, disputed interpretations of when CVRA protections begin and procedural rulings that elevated government convenience over victim participation. Even after a federal judge found that prosecutors had violated the victims’ rights, later appellate decisions left them without an effective remedy because Epstein had never been formally charged in federal court before the agreement was reached. The result was a devastating legal loophole: prosecutors could secretly negotiate away a case before filing charges and then argue that the victims had no enforceable rights because no case had yet been filed. In the Epstein matter, the CVRA became less a shield for victims than another promise the justice system repeatedly failed to keep.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72971568</guid><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72971568/556b6e72_d169_4dd3_a3c6_8f1b99d5925f.mp3" length="49324661" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f5283086-dded-45a9-a4e3-33ea38b70bb6/f5283086-dded-45a9-a4e3-33ea38b70bb6.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f5283086-dded-45a9-a4e3-33ea38b70bb6/f5283086-dded-45a9-a4e3-33ea38b70bb6.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f5283086-dded-45a9-a4e3-33ea38b70bb6/f5283086-dded-45a9-a4e3-33ea38b70bb6.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Crime Victims’ Rights Act was supposed to guarantee victims notice, dignity, participation and the right to be heard, yet those protections were repeatedly cast aside throughout the Epstein case. Federal prosecutors negotiated the 2007...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Crime Victims’ Rights Act was supposed to guarantee victims notice, dignity, participation and the right to be heard, yet those protections were repeatedly cast aside throughout the Epstein case. Federal prosecutors negotiated the 2007 non-prosecution agreement in secret, concealed it from the girls Epstein abused and allowed Epstein and his alleged co-conspirators to receive extraordinary protections without the victims having any meaningful opportunity to object. The victims were misled about the status of the investigation while the government quietly finalized a deal that prevented federal prosecution and helped Epstein secure an exceptionally lenient state sentence. By the time the truth emerged, the agreement had already been executed, leaving the victims to fight for years merely to establish that the government had denied them the basic rights Congress had promised.<br /><br />The violations did not end with the original agreement because the victims have repeatedly been forced to battle the same institutions that failed them in the first place. They have faced delays, secrecy, withheld records, disputed interpretations of when CVRA protections begin and procedural rulings that elevated government convenience over victim participation. Even after a federal judge found that prosecutors had violated the victims’ rights, later appellate decisions left them without an effective remedy because Epstein had never been formally charged in federal court before the agreement was reached. The result was a devastating legal loophole: prosecutors could secretly negotiate away a case before filing charges and then argue that the victims had no enforceable rights because no case had yet been filed. In the Epstein matter, the CVRA became less a shield for victims than another promise the justice system repeatedly failed to keep.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3083</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   Jeffrey Epstein's Crimes And The Gigantic Shrug Down In Florida (7/14/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-s-crimes-and-the-gigantic-shrug-down-in-florida-7-14-26--72971567</link><description><![CDATA[Epstein-related justice in Florida was shrugged away through a combination of prosecutorial weakness, institutional deference and an extraordinary willingness to treat serious allegations as an inconvenience rather than a public emergency. Palm Beach police developed evidence involving numerous underage girls, yet the case was steadily narrowed, softened and redirected until Epstein received a plea deal that bore little resemblance to the scale of the conduct under investigation. Federal prosecutors then negotiated a secret non-prosecution agreement that protected Epstein and granted immunity to potential co-conspirators, while the victims were kept in the dark. Instead of pursuing the full network, examining the people who enabled him or testing the evidence before a jury, authorities accepted a resolution that allowed a wealthy and well-connected defendant to avoid the consequences an ordinary person would likely have faced.<br /><br />The indifference continued after Epstein began serving his sentence, when he received unusually generous work-release privileges and was permitted to leave jail for hours at a time under conditions that made a mockery of incarceration. Warning signs were minimized, oversight was weak and the victims were left to watch as the system appeared more concerned with accommodating Epstein than delivering justice. Florida had multiple opportunities to expose the operation, hold enablers accountable and demonstrate that wealth could not purchase a separate standard of justice, but those opportunities were repeatedly abandoned. What should have become a sweeping investigation into abuse, trafficking and institutional complicity was reduced to a managed scandal, leaving survivors with the unmistakable message that their suffering could be negotiated away.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72971567</guid><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72971567/cb2cfe2a_30a1_4f7b_b1ae_105f9a932317.mp3" length="40925771" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4613e11a-c779-4bd0-afaa-a9eb56dfd7d2/4613e11a-c779-4bd0-afaa-a9eb56dfd7d2.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4613e11a-c779-4bd0-afaa-a9eb56dfd7d2/4613e11a-c779-4bd0-afaa-a9eb56dfd7d2.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4613e11a-c779-4bd0-afaa-a9eb56dfd7d2/4613e11a-c779-4bd0-afaa-a9eb56dfd7d2.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Epstein-related justice in Florida was shrugged away through a combination of prosecutorial weakness, institutional deference and an extraordinary willingness to treat serious allegations as an inconvenience rather than a public emergency. Palm Beach...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Epstein-related justice in Florida was shrugged away through a combination of prosecutorial weakness, institutional deference and an extraordinary willingness to treat serious allegations as an inconvenience rather than a public emergency. Palm Beach police developed evidence involving numerous underage girls, yet the case was steadily narrowed, softened and redirected until Epstein received a plea deal that bore little resemblance to the scale of the conduct under investigation. Federal prosecutors then negotiated a secret non-prosecution agreement that protected Epstein and granted immunity to potential co-conspirators, while the victims were kept in the dark. Instead of pursuing the full network, examining the people who enabled him or testing the evidence before a jury, authorities accepted a resolution that allowed a wealthy and well-connected defendant to avoid the consequences an ordinary person would likely have faced.<br /><br />The indifference continued after Epstein began serving his sentence, when he received unusually generous work-release privileges and was permitted to leave jail for hours at a time under conditions that made a mockery of incarceration. Warning signs were minimized, oversight was weak and the victims were left to watch as the system appeared more concerned with accommodating Epstein than delivering justice. Florida had multiple opportunities to expose the operation, hold enablers accountable and demonstrate that wealth could not purchase a separate standard of justice, but those opportunities were repeatedly abandoned. What should have become a sweeping investigation into abuse, trafficking and institutional complicity was reduced to a managed scandal, leaving survivors with the unmistakable message that their suffering could be negotiated away.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2558</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Virginia Roberts Deposition That Helped Expose Epstein And Maxwell (Part 15)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-virginia-roberts-deposition-that-helped-expose-epstein-and-maxwell-part-15--72930312</link><description><![CDATA[In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.<br /><br />Giuffre’s deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell’s direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein’s residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein’s private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell’s London townhouse, and at Epstein’s New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell’s role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell’s 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me;<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.appealslawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/1090-32.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1090-32.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72930312</guid><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 04:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72930312/vrobdepo15.mp3" length="17548477" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9df995c2-54cc-429b-bc91-bb221d3f9aa6/9df995c2-54cc-429b-bc91-bb221d3f9aa6.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9df995c2-54cc-429b-bc91-bb221d3f9aa6/9df995c2-54cc-429b-bc91-bb221d3f9aa6.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9df995c2-54cc-429b-bc91-bb221d3f9aa6/9df995c2-54cc-429b-bc91-bb221d3f9aa6.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.<br /><br />Giuffre’s deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell’s direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein’s residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein’s private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell’s London townhouse, and at Epstein’s New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell’s role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell’s 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me;<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.appealslawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/1090-32.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1090-32.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1097</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Virginia Roberts Deposition That Helped Expose Epstein And Maxwell (Part 14)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-virginia-roberts-deposition-that-helped-expose-epstein-and-maxwell-part-14--72930317</link><description><![CDATA[In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.<br /><br />Giuffre’s deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell’s direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein’s residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein’s private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell’s London townhouse, and at Epstein’s New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell’s role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell’s 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me;<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.appealslawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/1090-32.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1090-32.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72930317</guid><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72930317/vrobdepo14.mp3" length="16897296" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/378932ff-b4d4-48f1-be7a-5d0fe06bbe74/378932ff-b4d4-48f1-be7a-5d0fe06bbe74.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/378932ff-b4d4-48f1-be7a-5d0fe06bbe74/378932ff-b4d4-48f1-be7a-5d0fe06bbe74.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/378932ff-b4d4-48f1-be7a-5d0fe06bbe74/378932ff-b4d4-48f1-be7a-5d0fe06bbe74.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.<br /><br />Giuffre’s deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell’s direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein’s residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein’s private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell’s London townhouse, and at Epstein’s New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell’s role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell’s 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me;<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.appealslawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/1090-32.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1090-32.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1057</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Virginia Roberts Deposition That Helped Expose Epstein And Maxwell (Part 13)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-virginia-roberts-deposition-that-helped-expose-epstein-and-maxwell-part-13--72930320</link><description><![CDATA[In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.<br /><br />Giuffre’s deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell’s direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein’s residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein’s private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell’s London townhouse, and at Epstein’s New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell’s role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell’s 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me;<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.appealslawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/1090-32.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1090-32.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72930320</guid><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72930320/vrobdepo13.mp3" length="19465238" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d41ea890-427d-4ab6-8170-5da119a97b8a/d41ea890-427d-4ab6-8170-5da119a97b8a.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d41ea890-427d-4ab6-8170-5da119a97b8a/d41ea890-427d-4ab6-8170-5da119a97b8a.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d41ea890-427d-4ab6-8170-5da119a97b8a/d41ea890-427d-4ab6-8170-5da119a97b8a.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.<br /><br />Giuffre’s deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell’s direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein’s residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein’s private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell’s London townhouse, and at Epstein’s New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell’s role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell’s 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me;<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.appealslawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/1090-32.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1090-32.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1217</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Virginia Roberts Deposition That Helped Expose Epstein And Maxwell (Part 12)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-virginia-roberts-deposition-that-helped-expose-epstein-and-maxwell-part-12--72930328</link><description><![CDATA[In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.<br /><br />Giuffre’s deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell’s direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein’s residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein’s private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell’s London townhouse, and at Epstein’s New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell’s role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell’s 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me;<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.appealslawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/1090-32.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1090-32.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72930328</guid><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72930328/vrobdepo12.mp3" length="14383690" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/397e236f-f9a3-45f8-9d74-57a95cb7a677/397e236f-f9a3-45f8-9d74-57a95cb7a677.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/397e236f-f9a3-45f8-9d74-57a95cb7a677/397e236f-f9a3-45f8-9d74-57a95cb7a677.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/397e236f-f9a3-45f8-9d74-57a95cb7a677/397e236f-f9a3-45f8-9d74-57a95cb7a677.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.<br /><br />Giuffre’s deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell’s direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein’s residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein’s private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell’s London townhouse, and at Epstein’s New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell’s role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell’s 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me;<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.appealslawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/1090-32.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1090-32.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>899</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Lesley Groff And The Transcript From Her Epstein Related Trip to Congress (Part 12) (7/14/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/lesley-groff-and-the-transcript-from-her-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-12-7-14-26--72952069</link><description><![CDATA[Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her central position was that Epstein kept her separated from his criminal life, that she never witnessed abuse, never had a victim disclose abuse to her, and did not knowingly help Epstein or Maxwell commit crimes. She described Epstein as a “master manipulator” who lied to her and kept his “legitimate” world apart from his abuse, while acknowledging that she scheduled massage appointments when Epstein provided names and numbers, sometimes circulated calendars that included those appointments early on, and understood the massages as routine at the time. She said she did not personally meet the massage providers, did not know they were minors or young women, and assumed they were masseuses, even though members pressed her on why an extremely wealthy man would use rotating names and phone numbers instead of a professional massage service.<br /><br />The questioning also focused heavily on Epstein’s network and whether Groff had knowledge of powerful men being provided access to girls or young women through Epstein or Maxwell. Groff repeatedly answered no when asked whether she had arranged massages for prominent figures, knew of sexual activity involving minors or young women, or knew of anyone who knowingly facilitated Epstein’s crimes. She acknowledged scheduling or connecting Epstein with high-profile contacts, including Prince Andrew, Ehud Barak, Larry Summers, George Mitchell, John Kerry, Wesley Clark, Bill Clinton-related circles, and Donald Trump phone calls, but denied arranging Trump travel during her employment and denied knowledge of Trump-related law enforcement communications. She also said she never suspected Epstein or Maxwell of working with any intelligence service. Overall, Groff’s testimony was defensive and narrow: she admitted to being part of the machinery that kept Epstein’s calendar and contacts moving, but insisted she never saw the criminal operation underneath it and never knowingly enabled it.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:  <br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72952069</guid><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72952069/grofftranscript12.mp3" length="12953017" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5dfa5010-6a22-486e-b6ca-fac26342ac9f/5dfa5010-6a22-486e-b6ca-fac26342ac9f.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5dfa5010-6a22-486e-b6ca-fac26342ac9f/5dfa5010-6a22-486e-b6ca-fac26342ac9f.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5dfa5010-6a22-486e-b6ca-fac26342ac9f/5dfa5010-6a22-486e-b6ca-fac26342ac9f.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her central position was that Epstein kept her separated from his criminal life, that she never witnessed abuse, never had a victim disclose abuse to her, and did not knowingly help Epstein or Maxwell commit crimes. She described Epstein as a “master manipulator” who lied to her and kept his “legitimate” world apart from his abuse, while acknowledging that she scheduled massage appointments when Epstein provided names and numbers, sometimes circulated calendars that included those appointments early on, and understood the massages as routine at the time. She said she did not personally meet the massage providers, did not know they were minors or young women, and assumed they were masseuses, even though members pressed her on why an extremely wealthy man would use rotating names and phone numbers instead of a professional massage service.<br /><br />The questioning also focused heavily on Epstein’s network and whether Groff had knowledge of powerful men being provided access to girls or young women through Epstein or Maxwell. Groff repeatedly answered no when asked whether she had arranged massages for prominent figures, knew of sexual activity involving minors or young women, or knew of anyone who knowingly facilitated Epstein’s crimes. She acknowledged scheduling or connecting Epstein with high-profile contacts, including Prince Andrew, Ehud Barak, Larry Summers, George Mitchell, John Kerry, Wesley Clark, Bill Clinton-related circles, and Donald Trump phone calls, but denied arranging Trump travel during her employment and denied knowledge of Trump-related law enforcement communications. She also said she never suspected Epstein or Maxwell of working with any intelligence service. Overall, Groff’s testimony was defensive and narrow: she admitted to being part of the machinery that kept Epstein’s calendar and contacts moving, but insisted she never saw the criminal operation underneath it and never knowingly enabled it.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:  <br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>810</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Lesley Groff And The Transcript From Her Epstein Related Trip to Congress (Part 11) (7/12/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/lesley-groff-and-the-transcript-from-her-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-11-7-12-26--72952073</link><description><![CDATA[Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her central position was that Epstein kept her separated from his criminal life, that she never witnessed abuse, never had a victim disclose abuse to her, and did not knowingly help Epstein or Maxwell commit crimes. She described Epstein as a “master manipulator” who lied to her and kept his “legitimate” world apart from his abuse, while acknowledging that she scheduled massage appointments when Epstein provided names and numbers, sometimes circulated calendars that included those appointments early on, and understood the massages as routine at the time. She said she did not personally meet the massage providers, did not know they were minors or young women, and assumed they were masseuses, even though members pressed her on why an extremely wealthy man would use rotating names and phone numbers instead of a professional massage service.<br /><br />The questioning also focused heavily on Epstein’s network and whether Groff had knowledge of powerful men being provided access to girls or young women through Epstein or Maxwell. Groff repeatedly answered no when asked whether she had arranged massages for prominent figures, knew of sexual activity involving minors or young women, or knew of anyone who knowingly facilitated Epstein’s crimes. She acknowledged scheduling or connecting Epstein with high-profile contacts, including Prince Andrew, Ehud Barak, Larry Summers, George Mitchell, John Kerry, Wesley Clark, Bill Clinton-related circles, and Donald Trump phone calls, but denied arranging Trump travel during her employment and denied knowledge of Trump-related law enforcement communications. She also said she never suspected Epstein or Maxwell of working with any intelligence service. Overall, Groff’s testimony was defensive and narrow: she admitted to being part of the machinery that kept Epstein’s calendar and contacts moving, but insisted she never saw the criminal operation underneath it and never knowingly enabled it.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:  <br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72952073</guid><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 18:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72952073/grofftranscript11.mp3" length="15002271" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d97bf493-c68f-4b26-9e7e-9a7260322598/d97bf493-c68f-4b26-9e7e-9a7260322598.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d97bf493-c68f-4b26-9e7e-9a7260322598/d97bf493-c68f-4b26-9e7e-9a7260322598.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d97bf493-c68f-4b26-9e7e-9a7260322598/d97bf493-c68f-4b26-9e7e-9a7260322598.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her central position was that Epstein kept her separated from his criminal life, that she never witnessed abuse, never had a victim disclose abuse to her, and did not knowingly help Epstein or Maxwell commit crimes. She described Epstein as a “master manipulator” who lied to her and kept his “legitimate” world apart from his abuse, while acknowledging that she scheduled massage appointments when Epstein provided names and numbers, sometimes circulated calendars that included those appointments early on, and understood the massages as routine at the time. She said she did not personally meet the massage providers, did not know they were minors or young women, and assumed they were masseuses, even though members pressed her on why an extremely wealthy man would use rotating names and phone numbers instead of a professional massage service.<br /><br />The questioning also focused heavily on Epstein’s network and whether Groff had knowledge of powerful men being provided access to girls or young women through Epstein or Maxwell. Groff repeatedly answered no when asked whether she had arranged massages for prominent figures, knew of sexual activity involving minors or young women, or knew of anyone who knowingly facilitated Epstein’s crimes. She acknowledged scheduling or connecting Epstein with high-profile contacts, including Prince Andrew, Ehud Barak, Larry Summers, George Mitchell, John Kerry, Wesley Clark, Bill Clinton-related circles, and Donald Trump phone calls, but denied arranging Trump travel during her employment and denied knowledge of Trump-related law enforcement communications. She also said she never suspected Epstein or Maxwell of working with any intelligence service. Overall, Groff’s testimony was defensive and narrow: she admitted to being part of the machinery that kept Epstein’s calendar and contacts moving, but insisted she never saw the criminal operation underneath it and never knowingly enabled it.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:  <br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>938</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>New Mexico Investigators Still Waiting for Epstein Records (7/14/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/new-mexico-investigators-still-waiting-for-epstein-records-7-14-26--72956767</link><description><![CDATA[New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez is accusing the U.S. Department of Justice of obstructing his office’s renewed criminal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s Zorro Ranch by withholding unredacted federal records. Torrez said more than 130 days had passed since New Mexico first requested the material, despite six separate attempts to obtain assistance from federal officials. His office reopened the investigation in February 2026 after newly released records indicated that multiple survivors had allegedly been taken to the ranch and sexually abused there. Torrez argues that the unredacted files could identify survivors, witnesses, suspected co-conspirators and other people necessary for investigators to determine what happened at the property and whether prosecutable crimes remain.<br /><br />The dispute is especially significant because New Mexico previously suspended its investigation in 2019 after federal prosecutors asked the state to stand down while they pursued their case against Epstein. Epstein died in federal custody before that prosecution could be completed, leaving the alleged crimes at Zorro Ranch without a full accounting. Torrez warned that the continued delay is damaging the investigation as witnesses become harder to locate and evidence deteriorates or becomes more difficult to authenticate. The Justice Department disputes that it has stonewalled New Mexico and says it responded to the state’s requests and is prepared to assist, but Torrez has threatened to treat the request as formally denied at the end of July and potentially seek the records through a state court subpoena.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/new-mexico-ag-accuses-usdoj-delaying-justice-epstein-victims-1808229" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Trump Administration Accused by New Mexico of Blocking Crucial Jeffrey Epstein Ranch Files | IBTimes UK</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72956767</guid><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72956767/bf58c78f_238f_48d6_b341_7ea4bf7a579b.mp3" length="11481382" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/31f9733b-fa42-4cb6-a85c-1135c313c0ac/31f9733b-fa42-4cb6-a85c-1135c313c0ac.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/31f9733b-fa42-4cb6-a85c-1135c313c0ac/31f9733b-fa42-4cb6-a85c-1135c313c0ac.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/31f9733b-fa42-4cb6-a85c-1135c313c0ac/31f9733b-fa42-4cb6-a85c-1135c313c0ac.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez is accusing the U.S. Department of Justice of obstructing his office’s renewed criminal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s Zorro Ranch by withholding unredacted federal records. Torrez said more than 130 days...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez is accusing the U.S. Department of Justice of obstructing his office’s renewed criminal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s Zorro Ranch by withholding unredacted federal records. Torrez said more than 130 days had passed since New Mexico first requested the material, despite six separate attempts to obtain assistance from federal officials. His office reopened the investigation in February 2026 after newly released records indicated that multiple survivors had allegedly been taken to the ranch and sexually abused there. Torrez argues that the unredacted files could identify survivors, witnesses, suspected co-conspirators and other people necessary for investigators to determine what happened at the property and whether prosecutable crimes remain.<br /><br />The dispute is especially significant because New Mexico previously suspended its investigation in 2019 after federal prosecutors asked the state to stand down while they pursued their case against Epstein. Epstein died in federal custody before that prosecution could be completed, leaving the alleged crimes at Zorro Ranch without a full accounting. Torrez warned that the continued delay is damaging the investigation as witnesses become harder to locate and evidence deteriorates or becomes more difficult to authenticate. The Justice Department disputes that it has stonewalled New Mexico and says it responded to the state’s requests and is prepared to assist, but Torrez has threatened to treat the request as formally denied at the end of July and potentially seek the records through a state court subpoena.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/new-mexico-ag-accuses-usdoj-delaying-justice-epstein-victims-1808229" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Trump Administration Accused by New Mexico of Blocking Crucial Jeffrey Epstein Ranch Files | IBTimes UK</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>718</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Kathryn Ruemmler Set to Testify About Her Epstein Ties (7/14/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/kathryn-ruemmler-set-to-testify-about-her-epstein-ties-7-14-26--72956766</link><description><![CDATA[Kathryn Ruemmler, Goldman Sachs’ former chief legal officer and current senior counsel, is scheduled to testify before the House Oversight Committee as lawmakers investigate her relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and the federal government’s handling of his crimes. Ruemmler stepped down from Goldman’s top legal position at the end of June after newly released Justice Department records revealed that her contacts with Epstein were more extensive than previously known. Those records reportedly show numerous communications between the two from 2014 through 2019, years after Epstein’s 2008 conviction, as well as gifts Ruemmler accepted from him and advice she provided about responding to media questions concerning his criminal history<br /><br />The records also indicate that Epstein called Ruemmler’s cellphone on July 6, 2019, the day of his federal arrest on sex-trafficking charges. Ruemmler’s spokesperson has maintained that she did nothing improper, knew nothing about any ongoing criminal conduct and took no action after the brief call. Members of Congress are expected to question her about what she knew, whom Epstein discussed with her and how he maintained his influence among powerful institutions. Lawmakers have also criticized Goldman Sachs for retaining Ruemmler in an advisory role, arguing that the decision raises serious questions about the bank’s due diligence and its judgment concerning her ties to Epstein.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/crime/kathryn-ruemmler-jeffrey-epstein-congress-goldman-sachs-b3013782.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Congress to grill Goldman Sachs executive over newly revealed Epstein ties | The Independent</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72956766</guid><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72956766/fbe1d794_2959_4b90_bb08_541b6546404e.mp3" length="10120089" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c0457ae1-8b01-4679-8823-5f7e4d88cef1/c0457ae1-8b01-4679-8823-5f7e4d88cef1.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c0457ae1-8b01-4679-8823-5f7e4d88cef1/c0457ae1-8b01-4679-8823-5f7e4d88cef1.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c0457ae1-8b01-4679-8823-5f7e4d88cef1/c0457ae1-8b01-4679-8823-5f7e4d88cef1.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Kathryn Ruemmler, Goldman Sachs’ former chief legal officer and current senior counsel, is scheduled to testify before the House Oversight Committee as lawmakers investigate her relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and the federal government’s handling...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Kathryn Ruemmler, Goldman Sachs’ former chief legal officer and current senior counsel, is scheduled to testify before the House Oversight Committee as lawmakers investigate her relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and the federal government’s handling of his crimes. Ruemmler stepped down from Goldman’s top legal position at the end of June after newly released Justice Department records revealed that her contacts with Epstein were more extensive than previously known. Those records reportedly show numerous communications between the two from 2014 through 2019, years after Epstein’s 2008 conviction, as well as gifts Ruemmler accepted from him and advice she provided about responding to media questions concerning his criminal history<br /><br />The records also indicate that Epstein called Ruemmler’s cellphone on July 6, 2019, the day of his federal arrest on sex-trafficking charges. Ruemmler’s spokesperson has maintained that she did nothing improper, knew nothing about any ongoing criminal conduct and took no action after the brief call. Members of Congress are expected to question her about what she knew, whom Epstein discussed with her and how he maintained his influence among powerful institutions. Lawmakers have also criticized Goldman Sachs for retaining Ruemmler in an advisory role, arguing that the decision raises serious questions about the bank’s due diligence and its judgment concerning her ties to Epstein.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/crime/kathryn-ruemmler-jeffrey-epstein-congress-goldman-sachs-b3013782.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Congress to grill Goldman Sachs executive over newly revealed Epstein ties | The Independent</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>633</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Beatrice, Eugenie and the Burden of Prince Andrew’s Disgrace (7/14/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/beatrice-eugenie-and-the-burden-of-prince-andrew-s-disgrace-7-14-26--72956765</link><description><![CDATA[Prince Andrew appears to be using his daughters once again as human shields against the continuing fallout from his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Reports that he encouraged Beatrice and Eugenie to attend prominent royal and society events with their heads held high suggest an effort to keep the York family publicly visible and to demonstrate that they have not been completely cast out. Rather than allowing his daughters to build identities separate from his disgrace, Andrew’s strategy risks turning every appearance they make into a referendum on him. Their royal status, popularity and continued access to respectable circles can then be presented as indirect evidence that the family remains accepted, even while Andrew himself is sidelined and facing renewed scrutiny.<br /><br />This is especially troubling because Andrew has already placed one of his daughters inside his defense of the allegations made by Virginia Giuffre. During his disastrous Newsnight interview, he invoked Beatrice while claiming that he had taken her to a birthday party at Pizza Express in Woking on the day Giuffre alleged she was trafficked to him, effectively making his daughter part of his alibi. Now, as the Epstein scandal continues to engulf the York family, Beatrice and Eugenie are again being pushed into public view while carrying consequences created by their father’s behavior. The princesses are not responsible for Andrew’s decisions, but his repeated reliance upon their names, visibility and royal legitimacy makes it appear that he is willing to let them absorb some of the pressure in his place.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://radaronline.com/p/andrew-windsor-using-daughters-princess-beatrice-eugenie-royal-exile/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EXCLUSIVE: Andrew Windsor 'Using Panicked Daughters' to Fight Royal Exile</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72956765</guid><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72956765/a6def961_194a_4fb6_807c_d78aaad462d3.mp3" length="11810734" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b68d1c30-88e0-4a75-bbcb-ce6004f54caf/b68d1c30-88e0-4a75-bbcb-ce6004f54caf.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b68d1c30-88e0-4a75-bbcb-ce6004f54caf/b68d1c30-88e0-4a75-bbcb-ce6004f54caf.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b68d1c30-88e0-4a75-bbcb-ce6004f54caf/b68d1c30-88e0-4a75-bbcb-ce6004f54caf.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Prince Andrew appears to be using his daughters once again as human shields against the continuing fallout from his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Reports that he encouraged Beatrice and Eugenie to attend prominent royal and society events with...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Prince Andrew appears to be using his daughters once again as human shields against the continuing fallout from his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Reports that he encouraged Beatrice and Eugenie to attend prominent royal and society events with their heads held high suggest an effort to keep the York family publicly visible and to demonstrate that they have not been completely cast out. Rather than allowing his daughters to build identities separate from his disgrace, Andrew’s strategy risks turning every appearance they make into a referendum on him. Their royal status, popularity and continued access to respectable circles can then be presented as indirect evidence that the family remains accepted, even while Andrew himself is sidelined and facing renewed scrutiny.<br /><br />This is especially troubling because Andrew has already placed one of his daughters inside his defense of the allegations made by Virginia Giuffre. During his disastrous Newsnight interview, he invoked Beatrice while claiming that he had taken her to a birthday party at Pizza Express in Woking on the day Giuffre alleged she was trafficked to him, effectively making his daughter part of his alibi. Now, as the Epstein scandal continues to engulf the York family, Beatrice and Eugenie are again being pushed into public view while carrying consequences created by their father’s behavior. The princesses are not responsible for Andrew’s decisions, but his repeated reliance upon their names, visibility and royal legitimacy makes it appear that he is willing to let them absorb some of the pressure in his place.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://radaronline.com/p/andrew-windsor-using-daughters-princess-beatrice-eugenie-royal-exile/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EXCLUSIVE: Andrew Windsor 'Using Panicked Daughters' to Fight Royal Exile</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>739</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   A Look Back At The Ghislaine Maxwell Trial (Part 3) (7/14/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-a-look-back-at-the-ghislaine-maxwell-trial-part-3-7-14-26--72938271</link><description><![CDATA[This episode takes a flashback look at some of the biggest moments from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, revisiting the testimony, courtroom exchanges, and key developments that stood out as the case unfolded. Rather than retelling the entire trial from beginning to end, the episode returns to selected highlights that captured the weight of the proceedings and helped shape the public’s understanding of Maxwell’s role in Jeffrey Epstein’s operation.<br /><br />From powerful witness testimony to pivotal moments involving the prosecution and defense, these clips offer a snapshot of one of the most closely watched trials connected to the Epstein scandal. The episode is a look back at the moments that defined the courtroom drama, exposed important details, and ultimately contributed to Maxwell’s conviction.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72938271</guid><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72938271/288be728_b120_4633_a9b0_b4658af97fe4.mp3" length="66584285" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/130e54cf-4503-4587-8ae0-ab3aecbbdb3c/130e54cf-4503-4587-8ae0-ab3aecbbdb3c.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/130e54cf-4503-4587-8ae0-ab3aecbbdb3c/130e54cf-4503-4587-8ae0-ab3aecbbdb3c.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/130e54cf-4503-4587-8ae0-ab3aecbbdb3c/130e54cf-4503-4587-8ae0-ab3aecbbdb3c.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>This episode takes a flashback look at some of the biggest moments from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, revisiting the testimony, courtroom exchanges, and key developments that stood out as the case unfolded. Rather than retelling the entire trial from...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[This episode takes a flashback look at some of the biggest moments from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, revisiting the testimony, courtroom exchanges, and key developments that stood out as the case unfolded. Rather than retelling the entire trial from beginning to end, the episode returns to selected highlights that captured the weight of the proceedings and helped shape the public’s understanding of Maxwell’s role in Jeffrey Epstein’s operation.<br /><br />From powerful witness testimony to pivotal moments involving the prosecution and defense, these clips offer a snapshot of one of the most closely watched trials connected to the Epstein scandal. The episode is a look back at the moments that defined the courtroom drama, exposed important details, and ultimately contributed to Maxwell’s conviction.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4162</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   A Look Back At The Ghislaine Maxwell Trial (Part 2) (7/14/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-a-look-back-at-the-ghislaine-maxwell-trial-part-2-7-14-26--72938272</link><description><![CDATA[This episode takes a flashback look at some of the biggest moments from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, revisiting the testimony, courtroom exchanges, and key developments that stood out as the case unfolded. Rather than retelling the entire trial from beginning to end, the episode returns to selected highlights that captured the weight of the proceedings and helped shape the public’s understanding of Maxwell’s role in Jeffrey Epstein’s operation.<br /><br />From powerful witness testimony to pivotal moments involving the prosecution and defense, these clips offer a snapshot of one of the most closely watched trials connected to the Epstein scandal. The episode is a look back at the moments that defined the courtroom drama, exposed important details, and ultimately contributed to Maxwell’s conviction.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72938272</guid><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 08:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72938272/548212a2_36ed_4002_a503_839cc5d6d893.mp3" length="60466617" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/38da892e-7e7e-4fad-8b9c-274c329ccd5d/38da892e-7e7e-4fad-8b9c-274c329ccd5d.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/38da892e-7e7e-4fad-8b9c-274c329ccd5d/38da892e-7e7e-4fad-8b9c-274c329ccd5d.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/38da892e-7e7e-4fad-8b9c-274c329ccd5d/38da892e-7e7e-4fad-8b9c-274c329ccd5d.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>This episode takes a flashback look at some of the biggest moments from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, revisiting the testimony, courtroom exchanges, and key developments that stood out as the case unfolded. Rather than retelling the entire trial from...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[This episode takes a flashback look at some of the biggest moments from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, revisiting the testimony, courtroom exchanges, and key developments that stood out as the case unfolded. Rather than retelling the entire trial from beginning to end, the episode returns to selected highlights that captured the weight of the proceedings and helped shape the public’s understanding of Maxwell’s role in Jeffrey Epstein’s operation.<br /><br />From powerful witness testimony to pivotal moments involving the prosecution and defense, these clips offer a snapshot of one of the most closely watched trials connected to the Epstein scandal. The episode is a look back at the moments that defined the courtroom drama, exposed important details, and ultimately contributed to Maxwell’s conviction.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3780</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   A Look Back At The Ghislaine Maxwell Trial (Part 1) (7/14/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-a-look-back-at-the-ghislaine-maxwell-trial-part-1-7-14-26--72938273</link><description><![CDATA[This episode takes a flashback look at some of the biggest moments from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, revisiting the testimony, courtroom exchanges, and key developments that stood out as the case unfolded. Rather than retelling the entire trial from beginning to end, the episode returns to selected highlights that captured the weight of the proceedings and helped shape the public’s understanding of Maxwell’s role in Jeffrey Epstein’s operation.<br /><br />From powerful witness testimony to pivotal moments involving the prosecution and defense, these clips offer a snapshot of one of the most closely watched trials connected to the Epstein scandal. The episode is a look back at the moments that defined the courtroom drama, exposed important details, and ultimately contributed to Maxwell’s conviction.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72938273</guid><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72938273/d99b53a1_b2f0_4695_8266_0d1fab136a0a.mp3" length="63366417" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/746b8edb-a03e-4e6c-99cf-d984fddac932/746b8edb-a03e-4e6c-99cf-d984fddac932.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/746b8edb-a03e-4e6c-99cf-d984fddac932/746b8edb-a03e-4e6c-99cf-d984fddac932.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/746b8edb-a03e-4e6c-99cf-d984fddac932/746b8edb-a03e-4e6c-99cf-d984fddac932.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>This episode takes a flashback look at some of the biggest moments from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, revisiting the testimony, courtroom exchanges, and key developments that stood out as the case unfolded. Rather than retelling the entire trial from...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[This episode takes a flashback look at some of the biggest moments from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, revisiting the testimony, courtroom exchanges, and key developments that stood out as the case unfolded. Rather than retelling the entire trial from beginning to end, the episode returns to selected highlights that captured the weight of the proceedings and helped shape the public’s understanding of Maxwell’s role in Jeffrey Epstein’s operation.<br /><br />From powerful witness testimony to pivotal moments involving the prosecution and defense, these clips offer a snapshot of one of the most closely watched trials connected to the Epstein scandal. The episode is a look back at the moments that defined the courtroom drama, exposed important details, and ultimately contributed to Maxwell’s conviction.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3961</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Virginia Roberts Deposition That Helped Expose Epstein And Maxwell (Part 11)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-virginia-roberts-deposition-that-helped-expose-epstein-and-maxwell-part-11--72930316</link><description><![CDATA[In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.<br /><br />Giuffre’s deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell’s direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein’s residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein’s private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell’s London townhouse, and at Epstein’s New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell’s role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell’s 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me;<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.appealslawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/1090-32.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1090-32.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72930316</guid><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 04:30:01 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72930316/vrobdepo11.mp3" length="12973914" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/da3923bd-e74c-4b20-a68c-f48068f2b311/da3923bd-e74c-4b20-a68c-f48068f2b311.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/da3923bd-e74c-4b20-a68c-f48068f2b311/da3923bd-e74c-4b20-a68c-f48068f2b311.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/da3923bd-e74c-4b20-a68c-f48068f2b311/da3923bd-e74c-4b20-a68c-f48068f2b311.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.<br /><br />Giuffre’s deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell’s direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein’s residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein’s private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell’s London townhouse, and at Epstein’s New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell’s role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell’s 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me;<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.appealslawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/1090-32.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1090-32.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>811</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Virginia Roberts Deposition That Helped Expose Epstein And Maxwell (Part 10)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-virginia-roberts-deposition-that-helped-expose-epstein-and-maxwell-part-10--72930324</link><description><![CDATA[In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.<br /><br />Giuffre’s deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell’s direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein’s residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein’s private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell’s London townhouse, and at Epstein’s New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell’s role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell’s 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me;<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.appealslawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/1090-32.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1090-32.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72930324</guid><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 02:30:11 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72930324/vrobdepo10.mp3" length="17076601" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ecd71c6c-f4fb-4394-9deb-c1a2397b7ba0/ecd71c6c-f4fb-4394-9deb-c1a2397b7ba0.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ecd71c6c-f4fb-4394-9deb-c1a2397b7ba0/ecd71c6c-f4fb-4394-9deb-c1a2397b7ba0.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ecd71c6c-f4fb-4394-9deb-c1a2397b7ba0/ecd71c6c-f4fb-4394-9deb-c1a2397b7ba0.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.<br /><br />Giuffre’s deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell’s direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein’s residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein’s private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell’s London townhouse, and at Epstein’s New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell’s role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell’s 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me;<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.appealslawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/1090-32.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1090-32.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1068</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Virginia Roberts Deposition That Helped Expose Epstein And Maxwell (Part 9)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-virginia-roberts-deposition-that-helped-expose-epstein-and-maxwell-part-9--72930315</link><description><![CDATA[In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.<br /><br />Giuffre’s deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell’s direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein’s residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein’s private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell’s London townhouse, and at Epstein’s New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell’s role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell’s 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me;<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.appealslawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/1090-32.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1090-32.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72930315</guid><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 00:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72930315/vrobdepo9.mp3" length="18147412" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5da4f4bc-d6e4-4eab-93d9-98d12f6d27ba/5da4f4bc-d6e4-4eab-93d9-98d12f6d27ba.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5da4f4bc-d6e4-4eab-93d9-98d12f6d27ba/5da4f4bc-d6e4-4eab-93d9-98d12f6d27ba.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5da4f4bc-d6e4-4eab-93d9-98d12f6d27ba/5da4f4bc-d6e4-4eab-93d9-98d12f6d27ba.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.<br /><br />Giuffre’s deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell’s direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein’s residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein’s private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell’s London townhouse, and at Epstein’s New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell’s role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell’s 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me;<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.appealslawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/1090-32.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1090-32.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1135</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>What We Learned During the Tyler Robinson Preliminary Hearing (Part 2) (7/13/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/what-we-learned-during-the-tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-part-2-7-13-26--72955428</link><description><![CDATA[The five-day preliminary hearing gave the clearest public look yet at the case prosecutors have assembled against Tyler Robinson in the killing of Charlie Kirk. The state presented surveillance footage that investigators said tracked Robinson’s vehicle and movements around Utah Valley University, showed a figure reaching the rooftop firing position, and followed the alleged escape route toward the wooded area where a bolt-action rifle wrapped in a towel was recovered. Prosecutors also introduced DNA evidence linking Robinson to the rifle, ammunition, towel, and a tool allegedly used to engrave the cartridges. Digital messages attributed to Robinson appeared to discuss the rifle, the engraved rounds, fingerprints, retrieving the weapon, deleting messages, and staying silent with police. A recorded interview with Robinson’s former roommate and romantic partner, Lance Twiggs, added allegations that Robinson admitted what he had done, cried, and said he wished he had not done it. Taken together, prosecutors argued that the surveillance, physical evidence, DNA, messages, family recognition, surrender, and alleged admissions formed a continuous chain connecting Robinson to the planning, shooting, escape, and attempted concealment.<br /><br />The defense spent the hearing attacking the weaknesses inside that chain rather than offering a complete alternative account of the killing. Robinson’s lawyers emphasized that the surveillance footage does not show a clear facial image of the shooter, the damaged bullet fragment could not be conclusively matched to the recovered rifle, and DNA evidence can establish contact without proving when or why an item was handled. They also raised questions about secondary DNA transfer, Twiggs’s immunity agreement, the presence of his DNA on some evidence, missing clothing, an empty holster that was seen but never collected, and the use of edited or enhanced video compilations. The hearing did not determine Robinson’s guilt because the state only had to establish probable cause, not prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt. Testimony has concluded, but Judge Tony Graf has not yet issued a bind-over ruling. Both sides are expected to submit written arguments before returning to court on September 1, 2026, when the judge will consider whether Robinson should stand trial on aggravated murder and the additional firearm, obstruction, witness-tampering, and child-presence charges. The prosecution appears heavily favored to clear the relatively low probable-cause threshold, but the defense exposed several issues that could become central disputes if the case reaches a capital trial.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72955428</guid><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72955428/5c7ad559_2095_46c9_a00f_1bd7cc62a2c8.mp3" length="19223658" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/99434378-daa7-4d20-9fff-ce2727d776b3/99434378-daa7-4d20-9fff-ce2727d776b3.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/99434378-daa7-4d20-9fff-ce2727d776b3/99434378-daa7-4d20-9fff-ce2727d776b3.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/99434378-daa7-4d20-9fff-ce2727d776b3/99434378-daa7-4d20-9fff-ce2727d776b3.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The five-day preliminary hearing gave the clearest public look yet at the case prosecutors have assembled against Tyler Robinson in the killing of Charlie Kirk. The state presented surveillance footage that investigators said tracked Robinson’s...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The five-day preliminary hearing gave the clearest public look yet at the case prosecutors have assembled against Tyler Robinson in the killing of Charlie Kirk. The state presented surveillance footage that investigators said tracked Robinson’s vehicle and movements around Utah Valley University, showed a figure reaching the rooftop firing position, and followed the alleged escape route toward the wooded area where a bolt-action rifle wrapped in a towel was recovered. Prosecutors also introduced DNA evidence linking Robinson to the rifle, ammunition, towel, and a tool allegedly used to engrave the cartridges. Digital messages attributed to Robinson appeared to discuss the rifle, the engraved rounds, fingerprints, retrieving the weapon, deleting messages, and staying silent with police. A recorded interview with Robinson’s former roommate and romantic partner, Lance Twiggs, added allegations that Robinson admitted what he had done, cried, and said he wished he had not done it. Taken together, prosecutors argued that the surveillance, physical evidence, DNA, messages, family recognition, surrender, and alleged admissions formed a continuous chain connecting Robinson to the planning, shooting, escape, and attempted concealment.<br /><br />The defense spent the hearing attacking the weaknesses inside that chain rather than offering a complete alternative account of the killing. Robinson’s lawyers emphasized that the surveillance footage does not show a clear facial image of the shooter, the damaged bullet fragment could not be conclusively matched to the recovered rifle, and DNA evidence can establish contact without proving when or why an item was handled. They also raised questions about secondary DNA transfer, Twiggs’s immunity agreement, the presence of his DNA on some evidence, missing clothing, an empty holster that was seen but never collected, and the use of edited or enhanced video compilations. The hearing did not determine Robinson’s guilt because the state only had to establish probable cause, not prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt. Testimony has concluded, but Judge Tony Graf has not yet issued a bind-over ruling. Both sides are expected to submit written arguments before returning to court on September 1, 2026, when the judge will consider whether Robinson should stand trial on aggravated murder and the additional firearm, obstruction, witness-tampering, and child-presence charges. The prosecution appears heavily favored to clear the relatively low probable-cause threshold, but the defense exposed several issues that could become central disputes if the case reaches a capital trial.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1202</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvu</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>What We Learned During the Tyler Robinson Preliminary Hearing (Part 1) (7/13/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/what-we-learned-during-the-tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-part-1-7-13-26--72955429</link><description><![CDATA[The five-day preliminary hearing gave the clearest public look yet at the case prosecutors have assembled against Tyler Robinson in the killing of Charlie Kirk. The state presented surveillance footage that investigators said tracked Robinson’s vehicle and movements around Utah Valley University, showed a figure reaching the rooftop firing position, and followed the alleged escape route toward the wooded area where a bolt-action rifle wrapped in a towel was recovered. Prosecutors also introduced DNA evidence linking Robinson to the rifle, ammunition, towel, and a tool allegedly used to engrave the cartridges. Digital messages attributed to Robinson appeared to discuss the rifle, the engraved rounds, fingerprints, retrieving the weapon, deleting messages, and staying silent with police. A recorded interview with Robinson’s former roommate and romantic partner, Lance Twiggs, added allegations that Robinson admitted what he had done, cried, and said he wished he had not done it. Taken together, prosecutors argued that the surveillance, physical evidence, DNA, messages, family recognition, surrender, and alleged admissions formed a continuous chain connecting Robinson to the planning, shooting, escape, and attempted concealment.<br /><br />The defense spent the hearing attacking the weaknesses inside that chain rather than offering a complete alternative account of the killing. Robinson’s lawyers emphasized that the surveillance footage does not show a clear facial image of the shooter, the damaged bullet fragment could not be conclusively matched to the recovered rifle, and DNA evidence can establish contact without proving when or why an item was handled. They also raised questions about secondary DNA transfer, Twiggs’s immunity agreement, the presence of his DNA on some evidence, missing clothing, an empty holster that was seen but never collected, and the use of edited or enhanced video compilations. The hearing did not determine Robinson’s guilt because the state only had to establish probable cause, not prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt. Testimony has concluded, but Judge Tony Graf has not yet issued a bind-over ruling. Both sides are expected to submit written arguments before returning to court on September 1, 2026, when the judge will consider whether Robinson should stand trial on aggravated murder and the additional firearm, obstruction, witness-tampering, and child-presence charges. The prosecution appears heavily favored to clear the relatively low probable-cause threshold, but the defense exposed several issues that could become central disputes if the case reaches a capital trial.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72955429</guid><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 20:32:56 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72955429/a4c815e5_dbe2_4cc7_a247_ea51fc14c17b.mp3" length="14170950" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9ee4208f-7efa-47cc-9c53-3ce986615063/9ee4208f-7efa-47cc-9c53-3ce986615063.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9ee4208f-7efa-47cc-9c53-3ce986615063/9ee4208f-7efa-47cc-9c53-3ce986615063.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9ee4208f-7efa-47cc-9c53-3ce986615063/9ee4208f-7efa-47cc-9c53-3ce986615063.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The five-day preliminary hearing gave the clearest public look yet at the case prosecutors have assembled against Tyler Robinson in the killing of Charlie Kirk. The state presented surveillance footage that investigators said tracked Robinson’s...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The five-day preliminary hearing gave the clearest public look yet at the case prosecutors have assembled against Tyler Robinson in the killing of Charlie Kirk. The state presented surveillance footage that investigators said tracked Robinson’s vehicle and movements around Utah Valley University, showed a figure reaching the rooftop firing position, and followed the alleged escape route toward the wooded area where a bolt-action rifle wrapped in a towel was recovered. Prosecutors also introduced DNA evidence linking Robinson to the rifle, ammunition, towel, and a tool allegedly used to engrave the cartridges. Digital messages attributed to Robinson appeared to discuss the rifle, the engraved rounds, fingerprints, retrieving the weapon, deleting messages, and staying silent with police. A recorded interview with Robinson’s former roommate and romantic partner, Lance Twiggs, added allegations that Robinson admitted what he had done, cried, and said he wished he had not done it. Taken together, prosecutors argued that the surveillance, physical evidence, DNA, messages, family recognition, surrender, and alleged admissions formed a continuous chain connecting Robinson to the planning, shooting, escape, and attempted concealment.<br /><br />The defense spent the hearing attacking the weaknesses inside that chain rather than offering a complete alternative account of the killing. Robinson’s lawyers emphasized that the surveillance footage does not show a clear facial image of the shooter, the damaged bullet fragment could not be conclusively matched to the recovered rifle, and DNA evidence can establish contact without proving when or why an item was handled. They also raised questions about secondary DNA transfer, Twiggs’s immunity agreement, the presence of his DNA on some evidence, missing clothing, an empty holster that was seen but never collected, and the use of edited or enhanced video compilations. The hearing did not determine Robinson’s guilt because the state only had to establish probable cause, not prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt. Testimony has concluded, but Judge Tony Graf has not yet issued a bind-over ruling. Both sides are expected to submit written arguments before returning to court on September 1, 2026, when the judge will consider whether Robinson should stand trial on aggravated murder and the additional firearm, obstruction, witness-tampering, and child-presence charges. The prosecution appears heavily favored to clear the relatively low probable-cause threshold, but the defense exposed several issues that could become central disputes if the case reaches a capital trial.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>886</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvu</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Same Grifters, the Same Tactics, a New Case (Part 2) (7/13/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-same-grifters-the-same-tactics-a-new-case-part-2-7-13-26--72948639</link><description><![CDATA[The same grifters who spent years polluting the Epstein case with unsupported claims, selective evidence, manufactured certainty, and endless insinuation are now applying the same playbook to the murder of Charlie Kirk and the prosecution of Tyler Robinson. Instead of carefully separating verified facts from rumor, they seize on every incomplete detail, every disputed forensic issue, and every unanswered question as proof that the entire case is fraudulent. They present normal investigative gaps as evidence of conspiracy, distort testimony from court proceedings, and ignore evidence that contradicts the narrative they have already sold to their audience. The goal is not to determine what happened, but to keep the mystery alive because confusion, outrage, and suspicion generate clicks, subscriptions, and influence. Just as they turned the Epstein case into a marketplace of speculation where every absence of evidence became evidence of a cover-up, they are now portraying the Robinson case as a predetermined frame-up before the legal process has even run its course.<br /><br />The damage caused by this approach is not merely rhetorical. It poisons public understanding, makes legitimate scrutiny harder, and buries serious questions beneath mountains of exaggeration and misinformation. In the Epstein case, these figures often treated survivors, court records, financial evidence, and documented institutional failures as secondary to whatever sensational theory attracted the most attention. With Charlie Kirk’s murder, they are once again elevating rumor over testimony, speculation over forensic evidence, and internet sleuthing over the evidentiary record presented in court. None of this means prosecutors should escape scrutiny or that every aspect of the case must be accepted without question. It means criticism must be grounded in facts rather than engineered suspicion. The same people who helped turn the Epstein investigation into a circus of competing fantasies are now trying to do the same thing to the Tyler Robinson trial, and unless their tactics are confronted directly, the pursuit of truth will once again be drowned out by the pursuit of profit.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72948639</guid><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 18:30:07 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72948639/d51a793c_c270_43ec_8ec6_7b25f664411a.mp3" length="19555936" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d2539502-1449-4bc2-a253-4dcdda9e75df/d2539502-1449-4bc2-a253-4dcdda9e75df.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d2539502-1449-4bc2-a253-4dcdda9e75df/d2539502-1449-4bc2-a253-4dcdda9e75df.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d2539502-1449-4bc2-a253-4dcdda9e75df/d2539502-1449-4bc2-a253-4dcdda9e75df.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The same grifters who spent years polluting the Epstein case with unsupported claims, selective evidence, manufactured certainty, and endless insinuation are now applying the same playbook to the murder of Charlie Kirk and the prosecution of Tyler...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The same grifters who spent years polluting the Epstein case with unsupported claims, selective evidence, manufactured certainty, and endless insinuation are now applying the same playbook to the murder of Charlie Kirk and the prosecution of Tyler Robinson. Instead of carefully separating verified facts from rumor, they seize on every incomplete detail, every disputed forensic issue, and every unanswered question as proof that the entire case is fraudulent. They present normal investigative gaps as evidence of conspiracy, distort testimony from court proceedings, and ignore evidence that contradicts the narrative they have already sold to their audience. The goal is not to determine what happened, but to keep the mystery alive because confusion, outrage, and suspicion generate clicks, subscriptions, and influence. Just as they turned the Epstein case into a marketplace of speculation where every absence of evidence became evidence of a cover-up, they are now portraying the Robinson case as a predetermined frame-up before the legal process has even run its course.<br /><br />The damage caused by this approach is not merely rhetorical. It poisons public understanding, makes legitimate scrutiny harder, and buries serious questions beneath mountains of exaggeration and misinformation. In the Epstein case, these figures often treated survivors, court records, financial evidence, and documented institutional failures as secondary to whatever sensational theory attracted the most attention. With Charlie Kirk’s murder, they are once again elevating rumor over testimony, speculation over forensic evidence, and internet sleuthing over the evidentiary record presented in court. None of this means prosecutors should escape scrutiny or that every aspect of the case must be accepted without question. It means criticism must be grounded in facts rather than engineered suspicion. The same people who helped turn the Epstein investigation into a circus of competing fantasies are now trying to do the same thing to the Tyler Robinson trial, and unless their tactics are confronted directly, the pursuit of truth will once again be drowned out by the pursuit of profit.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1223</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvu</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Same Grifters, the Same Tactics, a New Case (Part 1) (7/13/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-same-grifters-the-same-tactics-a-new-case-part-1-7-13-26--72948638</link><description><![CDATA[The same grifters who spent years polluting the Epstein case with unsupported claims, selective evidence, manufactured certainty, and endless insinuation are now applying the same playbook to the murder of Charlie Kirk and the prosecution of Tyler Robinson. Instead of carefully separating verified facts from rumor, they seize on every incomplete detail, every disputed forensic issue, and every unanswered question as proof that the entire case is fraudulent. They present normal investigative gaps as evidence of conspiracy, distort testimony from court proceedings, and ignore evidence that contradicts the narrative they have already sold to their audience. The goal is not to determine what happened, but to keep the mystery alive because confusion, outrage, and suspicion generate clicks, subscriptions, and influence. Just as they turned the Epstein case into a marketplace of speculation where every absence of evidence became evidence of a cover-up, they are now portraying the Robinson case as a predetermined frame-up before the legal process has even run its course.<br /><br />The damage caused by this approach is not merely rhetorical. It poisons public understanding, makes legitimate scrutiny harder, and buries serious questions beneath mountains of exaggeration and misinformation. In the Epstein case, these figures often treated survivors, court records, financial evidence, and documented institutional failures as secondary to whatever sensational theory attracted the most attention. With Charlie Kirk’s murder, they are once again elevating rumor over testimony, speculation over forensic evidence, and internet sleuthing over the evidentiary record presented in court. None of this means prosecutors should escape scrutiny or that every aspect of the case must be accepted without question. It means criticism must be grounded in facts rather than engineered suspicion. The same people who helped turn the Epstein investigation into a circus of competing fantasies are now trying to do the same thing to the Tyler Robinson trial, and unless their tactics are confronted directly, the pursuit of truth will once again be drowned out by the pursuit of profit.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72948638</guid><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 16:30:20 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72948638/5b441361_a887_48e5_a988_d13b397681e3.mp3" length="15046156" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8b664176-254c-4656-ad0d-da44ea183167/8b664176-254c-4656-ad0d-da44ea183167.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8b664176-254c-4656-ad0d-da44ea183167/8b664176-254c-4656-ad0d-da44ea183167.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8b664176-254c-4656-ad0d-da44ea183167/8b664176-254c-4656-ad0d-da44ea183167.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The same grifters who spent years polluting the Epstein case with unsupported claims, selective evidence, manufactured certainty, and endless insinuation are now applying the same playbook to the murder of Charlie Kirk and the prosecution of Tyler...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The same grifters who spent years polluting the Epstein case with unsupported claims, selective evidence, manufactured certainty, and endless insinuation are now applying the same playbook to the murder of Charlie Kirk and the prosecution of Tyler Robinson. Instead of carefully separating verified facts from rumor, they seize on every incomplete detail, every disputed forensic issue, and every unanswered question as proof that the entire case is fraudulent. They present normal investigative gaps as evidence of conspiracy, distort testimony from court proceedings, and ignore evidence that contradicts the narrative they have already sold to their audience. The goal is not to determine what happened, but to keep the mystery alive because confusion, outrage, and suspicion generate clicks, subscriptions, and influence. Just as they turned the Epstein case into a marketplace of speculation where every absence of evidence became evidence of a cover-up, they are now portraying the Robinson case as a predetermined frame-up before the legal process has even run its course.<br /><br />The damage caused by this approach is not merely rhetorical. It poisons public understanding, makes legitimate scrutiny harder, and buries serious questions beneath mountains of exaggeration and misinformation. In the Epstein case, these figures often treated survivors, court records, financial evidence, and documented institutional failures as secondary to whatever sensational theory attracted the most attention. With Charlie Kirk’s murder, they are once again elevating rumor over testimony, speculation over forensic evidence, and internet sleuthing over the evidentiary record presented in court. None of this means prosecutors should escape scrutiny or that every aspect of the case must be accepted without question. It means criticism must be grounded in facts rather than engineered suspicion. The same people who helped turn the Epstein investigation into a circus of competing fantasies are now trying to do the same thing to the Tyler Robinson trial, and unless their tactics are confronted directly, the pursuit of truth will once again be drowned out by the pursuit of profit.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>941</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvu</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>British Detectives Head to America to Speak With Virginia Roberts’ Family (7/13/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/british-detectives-head-to-america-to-speak-with-virginia-roberts-family-7-13-26--72948628</link><description><![CDATA[Thames Valley Police detectives are reportedly preparing to travel to the United States to interview relatives of Virginia Giuffre as part of their expanding investigation into Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor. Officers are expected to speak with Giuffre’s brother, Sky Roberts, and his wife, Amanda, about her allegations that Andrew sexually assaulted her on three occasions when she was a teenager. Andrew, who has consistently denied wrongdoing, settled Giuffre’s civil lawsuit in 2022 for an estimated £12 million without admitting liability. The reported interviews follow Andrew’s February 2026 arrest on suspicion of misconduct in public office, after which he was released while the investigation continued.<br /><br />The inquiry has reportedly widened beyond Giuffre’s allegations to examine Andrew’s decade as Britain’s special trade representative between 2001 and 2011. Police are assessing potential allegations involving fraud, corruption, bullying, obstruction of justice and the possible misuse of confidential government or royal information. Investigators are also communicating with the Royal Household, the Department for Business and Trade and American authorities as they seek original Epstein-related documents and testimony from additional witnesses. Giuffre’s family welcomed Andrew’s arrest, saying it demonstrated that royalty should not place anyone beyond the reach of the law.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.thesun.co.uk/royals/39712524/andrew-detectives-fly-us-interview-virginia-giuffre-family/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Andrew detectives 'to fly to US to interview Virginia Giuffre's family over her sex allegations against ex-Prince'</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72948628</guid><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 14:30:05 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72948628/82a20995_7751_4589_8e72_3642e563fab0.mp3" length="11588380" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c740e826-efbe-4b09-b4b2-e7675c7201fb/c740e826-efbe-4b09-b4b2-e7675c7201fb.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c740e826-efbe-4b09-b4b2-e7675c7201fb/c740e826-efbe-4b09-b4b2-e7675c7201fb.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c740e826-efbe-4b09-b4b2-e7675c7201fb/c740e826-efbe-4b09-b4b2-e7675c7201fb.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Thames Valley Police detectives are reportedly preparing to travel to the United States to interview relatives of Virginia Giuffre as part of their expanding investigation into Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor. Officers are expected to speak with Giuffre’s...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Thames Valley Police detectives are reportedly preparing to travel to the United States to interview relatives of Virginia Giuffre as part of their expanding investigation into Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor. Officers are expected to speak with Giuffre’s brother, Sky Roberts, and his wife, Amanda, about her allegations that Andrew sexually assaulted her on three occasions when she was a teenager. Andrew, who has consistently denied wrongdoing, settled Giuffre’s civil lawsuit in 2022 for an estimated £12 million without admitting liability. The reported interviews follow Andrew’s February 2026 arrest on suspicion of misconduct in public office, after which he was released while the investigation continued.<br /><br />The inquiry has reportedly widened beyond Giuffre’s allegations to examine Andrew’s decade as Britain’s special trade representative between 2001 and 2011. Police are assessing potential allegations involving fraud, corruption, bullying, obstruction of justice and the possible misuse of confidential government or royal information. Investigators are also communicating with the Royal Household, the Department for Business and Trade and American authorities as they seek original Epstein-related documents and testimony from additional witnesses. Giuffre’s family welcomed Andrew’s arrest, saying it demonstrated that royalty should not place anyone beyond the reach of the law.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.thesun.co.uk/royals/39712524/andrew-detectives-fly-us-interview-virginia-giuffre-family/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Andrew detectives 'to fly to US to interview Virginia Giuffre's family over her sex allegations against ex-Prince'</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>725</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Epstein Survivors Say That Lesley Groff Wasn't Honest With Congress (7/13/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/epstein-survivors-say-that-lesley-groff-wasn-t-honest-with-congress-7-13-26--72948627</link><description><![CDATA[<br />Epstein survivors have publicly challenged Lesley Groff's testimony before Congress, arguing that her portrayal of herself as someone who knew nothing about Epstein's abuse operation is fundamentally incompatible with their experiences. During her June 2026 testimony, Groff described Epstein as a "master manipulator" who kept his criminal conduct hidden from her and insisted that she never knowingly scheduled appointments for minors or witnessed abuse. But several survivors told CNN and other outlets that Groff was far more deeply involved than she admitted, alleging that she arranged logistics, handled payments, possessed identifying documents that would have revealed victims' ages, and was present during key moments in Epstein's operation.<br /><br />For the survivors, the issue is not simply whether Groff knew every detail of Epstein's crimes; it is that they believe her testimony minimizes her role and rewrites history. Some of the women have said they directly interacted with Groff, received money from her, or provided her with personal information, making her claims of ignorance difficult for them to accept. Their criticism has been echoed by some lawmakers, who openly questioned the plausibility that someone who spent nearly two decades as Epstein's executive assistant, scheduling his daily activities and coordinating travel and "massages," remained entirely unaware of what was happening around her. Groff and her attorney continue to stand by her testimony, but for many survivors, her appearance before Congress was another example of an Epstein insider distancing herself from the operation rather than fully accounting for what she saw and did during those years.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72948627</guid><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72948627/940179e8_9ad4_48be_a038_1df4cfaad249.mp3" length="15941007" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/fccf2271-2a3d-40d8-ae5f-3d9758b231cd/fccf2271-2a3d-40d8-ae5f-3d9758b231cd.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/fccf2271-2a3d-40d8-ae5f-3d9758b231cd/fccf2271-2a3d-40d8-ae5f-3d9758b231cd.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/fccf2271-2a3d-40d8-ae5f-3d9758b231cd/fccf2271-2a3d-40d8-ae5f-3d9758b231cd.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Epstein survivors have publicly challenged Lesley Groff's testimony before Congress, arguing that her portrayal of herself as someone who knew nothing about Epstein's abuse operation is fundamentally incompatible with their experiences. During her...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br />Epstein survivors have publicly challenged Lesley Groff's testimony before Congress, arguing that her portrayal of herself as someone who knew nothing about Epstein's abuse operation is fundamentally incompatible with their experiences. During her June 2026 testimony, Groff described Epstein as a "master manipulator" who kept his criminal conduct hidden from her and insisted that she never knowingly scheduled appointments for minors or witnessed abuse. But several survivors told CNN and other outlets that Groff was far more deeply involved than she admitted, alleging that she arranged logistics, handled payments, possessed identifying documents that would have revealed victims' ages, and was present during key moments in Epstein's operation.<br /><br />For the survivors, the issue is not simply whether Groff knew every detail of Epstein's crimes; it is that they believe her testimony minimizes her role and rewrites history. Some of the women have said they directly interacted with Groff, received money from her, or provided her with personal information, making her claims of ignorance difficult for them to accept. Their criticism has been echoed by some lawmakers, who openly questioned the plausibility that someone who spent nearly two decades as Epstein's executive assistant, scheduling his daily activities and coordinating travel and "massages," remained entirely unaware of what was happening around her. Groff and her attorney continue to stand by her testimony, but for many survivors, her appearance before Congress was another example of an Epstein insider distancing herself from the operation rather than fully accounting for what she saw and did during those years.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>997</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The Epstein Files And The Golden Nuggets Contained Within Them (7/13/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-epstein-files-and-the-golden-nuggets-contained-within-them-7-13-26--72938279</link><description><![CDATA[The U.S. Department of Justice has begun releasing a massive tranche of documents related to its long-running investigations into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, following the Epstein Files Transparency Act—a law passed by Congress last November requiring the release of all relevant government files. On January 30, 2026, DOJ officials announced they had made available more than 3 million pages of records, along with over 2,000 videos and about 180,000 images, which represent the largest single disclosure of material to date. The files originate from multiple federal inquiries, including the Florida and New York Epstein cases, the Maxwell prosecution, and probes into Epstein’s death, and were extensively reviewed and redacted by hundreds of department attorneys to protect victim privacy before publication. Officials said the release brings DOJ into compliance with the transparency law, although some material was withheld under legal privileges or statutory exceptions.<br /><br /><br />The release has generated intense scrutiny and debate. The documents shed further light on Epstein’s activities and communications with wealthy and high-profile figures, and they include previously unseen correspondence, flight logs, court records, and other investigative material. However, the disclosure arrived more than a month after the December 19, 2025 deadline set by law, drawing bipartisan criticism that the process was slow and overly cautious. Some lawmakers and advocacy groups argue that millions of pages still remain unreleased and that redactions obscure critical information about Epstein’s network and alleged associates, while DOJ leadership has defended the review as necessary to protect victims and comply with legal requirements.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/31/politics/jeffrey-epstein-files-release-doj" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">What’s inside the latest Epstein files released by the Justice Department | CNN Politics</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72938279</guid><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 10:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72938279/megaepsteinfilesrevealed.mp3" length="63362656" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/88e87480-a312-475d-9af7-a5807cb50843/88e87480-a312-475d-9af7-a5807cb50843.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/88e87480-a312-475d-9af7-a5807cb50843/88e87480-a312-475d-9af7-a5807cb50843.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/88e87480-a312-475d-9af7-a5807cb50843/88e87480-a312-475d-9af7-a5807cb50843.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The U.S. Department of Justice has begun releasing a massive tranche of documents related to its long-running investigations into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, following the Epstein Files Transparency Act—a law passed by Congress last...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The U.S. Department of Justice has begun releasing a massive tranche of documents related to its long-running investigations into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, following the Epstein Files Transparency Act—a law passed by Congress last November requiring the release of all relevant government files. On January 30, 2026, DOJ officials announced they had made available more than 3 million pages of records, along with over 2,000 videos and about 180,000 images, which represent the largest single disclosure of material to date. The files originate from multiple federal inquiries, including the Florida and New York Epstein cases, the Maxwell prosecution, and probes into Epstein’s death, and were extensively reviewed and redacted by hundreds of department attorneys to protect victim privacy before publication. Officials said the release brings DOJ into compliance with the transparency law, although some material was withheld under legal privileges or statutory exceptions.<br /><br /><br />The release has generated intense scrutiny and debate. The documents shed further light on Epstein’s activities and communications with wealthy and high-profile figures, and they include previously unseen correspondence, flight logs, court records, and other investigative material. However, the disclosure arrived more than a month after the December 19, 2025 deadline set by law, drawing bipartisan criticism that the process was slow and overly cautious. Some lawmakers and advocacy groups argue that millions of pages still remain unreleased and that redactions obscure critical information about Epstein’s network and alleged associates, while DOJ leadership has defended the review as necessary to protect victims and comply with legal requirements.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/31/politics/jeffrey-epstein-files-release-doj" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">What’s inside the latest Epstein files released by the Justice Department | CNN Politics</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3961</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Inside  Brunel’s Planned Cooperation With U.S. Prosecutors (7/13/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-inside-brunel-s-planned-cooperation-with-u-s-prosecutors-7-13-26--72938278</link><description><![CDATA[In 2016, French modeling agent Jean-Luc Brunel was reportedly close to cooperating with U.S. prosecutors against Jeffrey Epstein, offering to testify about how he recruited girls for Epstein’s sex-trafficking operations and possessed incriminating material in exchange for immunity. Federal records show Brunel had discussions with lawyers for Epstein’s victims and was planning a meeting with the U.S. Attorney’s Office—suggesting he was prepared to provide evidence that could have significantly strengthened the case against Epstein years earlier. But once Epstein learned of these negotiations, Brunel suddenly went silent and ultimately never offered testimony, and prosecutors didn’t take immediate action at the time.<br /><br /><br />Brunel, who ran the modeling agency MC2 with Epstein’s financial backing and has long been accused of facilitating abuse by recruiting vulnerable women and girls under the pretense of modeling work, was not pursued by prosecutors in 2016 and Epstein remained free until his 2019 arrest. U.S. files show that this missed cooperation set back efforts to hold Epstein accountable and allowed his exploitation to continue. Brunel was later arrested in France in 2020 on sex-crime allegations and died in custody in 2022, but the earlier opportunity to challenge Epstein’s operations appears to have been lost when Brunel backed out of his planned cooperation.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/the-accomplice-who-was-going-to-testify-against-jeffrey-epstein-then-went-dark/ar-AA1WCNSM" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The accomplice who was going to testify against Jeffrey Epstein—then went dark</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72938278</guid><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72938278/megabrunelcooperatebeforedissappar.mp3" length="38903684" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cc23975b-b254-40c0-9a7c-94715661bd1f/cc23975b-b254-40c0-9a7c-94715661bd1f.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cc23975b-b254-40c0-9a7c-94715661bd1f/cc23975b-b254-40c0-9a7c-94715661bd1f.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cc23975b-b254-40c0-9a7c-94715661bd1f/cc23975b-b254-40c0-9a7c-94715661bd1f.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In 2016, French modeling agent Jean-Luc Brunel was reportedly close to cooperating with U.S. prosecutors against Jeffrey Epstein, offering to testify about how he recruited girls for Epstein’s sex-trafficking operations and possessed incriminating...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In 2016, French modeling agent Jean-Luc Brunel was reportedly close to cooperating with U.S. prosecutors against Jeffrey Epstein, offering to testify about how he recruited girls for Epstein’s sex-trafficking operations and possessed incriminating material in exchange for immunity. Federal records show Brunel had discussions with lawyers for Epstein’s victims and was planning a meeting with the U.S. Attorney’s Office—suggesting he was prepared to provide evidence that could have significantly strengthened the case against Epstein years earlier. But once Epstein learned of these negotiations, Brunel suddenly went silent and ultimately never offered testimony, and prosecutors didn’t take immediate action at the time.<br /><br /><br />Brunel, who ran the modeling agency MC2 with Epstein’s financial backing and has long been accused of facilitating abuse by recruiting vulnerable women and girls under the pretense of modeling work, was not pursued by prosecutors in 2016 and Epstein remained free until his 2019 arrest. U.S. files show that this missed cooperation set back efforts to hold Epstein accountable and allowed his exploitation to continue. Brunel was later arrested in France in 2020 on sex-crime allegations and died in custody in 2022, but the earlier opportunity to challenge Epstein’s operations appears to have been lost when Brunel backed out of his planned cooperation.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/the-accomplice-who-was-going-to-testify-against-jeffrey-epstein-then-went-dark/ar-AA1WCNSM" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The accomplice who was going to testify against Jeffrey Epstein—then went dark</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2432</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Epstein Investigations Abroad Move Forward as U.S. Accountability Freezes (7/12/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-epstein-investigations-abroad-move-forward-as-u-s-accountability-freezes-7-12-26--72938277</link><description><![CDATA[Across the Atlantic, European nations have responded to the release of Jeffrey Epstein–related files with a comparatively aggressive and public reckoning over elite complicity. In the United Kingdom, Norway, Poland, and elsewhere, the fallout from the documents has triggered formal investigations, high-profile resignations, and political consequences for figures whose names surfaced in the records, even if their involvement was peripheral or social. British politicians and advisers have stepped down amid public scrutiny, and Norwegian elites connected to Epstein are under investigation, with some issuing apologies and cooperating with authorities. Poland’s government has launched its own probe after identifying possible Polish victims in the documents — a sign that European governments are treating the revelations as a matter of serious legal and moral accountability rather than political spin control. This has unfolded amid significant media coverage and public pressure that frames Epstein’s abuses and networks as a cross-border scandal requiring transparent and sober investigation — not just partisan talking points.<br /><br />In contrast, the United States’ political and institutional response has been markedly more cautious, politicized, and slow, drawing sharp criticism from lawmakers, survivors, and commentators. Despite enacting the Epstein Files Transparency Act to force the release of millions of pages of investigative documents, the Justice Department missed legal deadlines, issued heavily redacted material, and has only gradually rolled out portions of the files, leading critics to accuse it of protecting powerful figures and delaying justice. Congressional hearings have been stymied by Maxwell’s refusal to cooperate, with her attorney openly suggesting she might only testify in exchange for presidential clemency — a development that illustrates how accountability has been bogged down in political negotiation rather than pursued with urgency. Meanwhile, public opinion polls show overwhelming dissatisfaction with how the U.S. government has handled the disclosures and lingering suspicion that elites are being shielded. This contrast — Europe acting with visible political consequences and institutional scrutiny, and the U.S. dragging its feet amid partisan posturing and limited tangible accountability — underscores deep weaknesses in American mechanisms for confronting abuses tied to wealth and influence.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.cnn.com/2026/02/10/politics/trump-epstein-maxwell-clemency-analysis" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Analysis: New roadblocks slow US reckoning over Epstein as Europe races ahead | CNN Politics</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72938277</guid><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 06:30:01 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72938277/megaepsteinstallsusmovesforwardeurope.mp3" length="44384383" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8448c815-34b7-49d4-aa30-c3a08810f0a3/8448c815-34b7-49d4-aa30-c3a08810f0a3.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8448c815-34b7-49d4-aa30-c3a08810f0a3/8448c815-34b7-49d4-aa30-c3a08810f0a3.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8448c815-34b7-49d4-aa30-c3a08810f0a3/8448c815-34b7-49d4-aa30-c3a08810f0a3.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Across the Atlantic, European nations have responded to the release of Jeffrey Epstein–related files with a comparatively aggressive and public reckoning over elite complicity. In the United Kingdom, Norway, Poland, and elsewhere, the fallout from the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Across the Atlantic, European nations have responded to the release of Jeffrey Epstein–related files with a comparatively aggressive and public reckoning over elite complicity. In the United Kingdom, Norway, Poland, and elsewhere, the fallout from the documents has triggered formal investigations, high-profile resignations, and political consequences for figures whose names surfaced in the records, even if their involvement was peripheral or social. British politicians and advisers have stepped down amid public scrutiny, and Norwegian elites connected to Epstein are under investigation, with some issuing apologies and cooperating with authorities. Poland’s government has launched its own probe after identifying possible Polish victims in the documents — a sign that European governments are treating the revelations as a matter of serious legal and moral accountability rather than political spin control. This has unfolded amid significant media coverage and public pressure that frames Epstein’s abuses and networks as a cross-border scandal requiring transparent and sober investigation — not just partisan talking points.<br /><br />In contrast, the United States’ political and institutional response has been markedly more cautious, politicized, and slow, drawing sharp criticism from lawmakers, survivors, and commentators. Despite enacting the Epstein Files Transparency Act to force the release of millions of pages of investigative documents, the Justice Department missed legal deadlines, issued heavily redacted material, and has only gradually rolled out portions of the files, leading critics to accuse it of protecting powerful figures and delaying justice. Congressional hearings have been stymied by Maxwell’s refusal to cooperate, with her attorney openly suggesting she might only testify in exchange for presidential clemency — a development that illustrates how accountability has been bogged down in political negotiation rather than pursued with urgency. Meanwhile, public opinion polls show overwhelming dissatisfaction with how the U.S. government has handled the disclosures and lingering suspicion that elites are being shielded. This contrast — Europe acting with visible political consequences and institutional scrutiny, and the U.S. dragging its feet amid partisan posturing and limited tangible accountability — underscores deep weaknesses in American mechanisms for confronting abuses tied to wealth and influence.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.cnn.com/2026/02/10/politics/trump-epstein-maxwell-clemency-analysis" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Analysis: New roadblocks slow US reckoning over Epstein as Europe races ahead | CNN Politics</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2774</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Virginia Roberts Deposition That Helped Expose Epstein And Maxwell (Part 8)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-virginia-roberts-deposition-that-helped-expose-epstein-and-maxwell-part-8--72930319</link><description><![CDATA[In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.<br /><br />Giuffre’s deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell’s direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein’s residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein’s private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell’s London townhouse, and at Epstein’s New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell’s role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell’s 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me;<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.appealslawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/1090-32.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1090-32.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72930319</guid><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 04:30:05 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72930319/vrobdepo8.mp3" length="19818413" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9ac27da5-66e3-42cb-b68e-4af29010c12a/9ac27da5-66e3-42cb-b68e-4af29010c12a.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9ac27da5-66e3-42cb-b68e-4af29010c12a/9ac27da5-66e3-42cb-b68e-4af29010c12a.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9ac27da5-66e3-42cb-b68e-4af29010c12a/9ac27da5-66e3-42cb-b68e-4af29010c12a.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.<br /><br />Giuffre’s deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell’s direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein’s residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein’s private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell’s London townhouse, and at Epstein’s New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell’s role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell’s 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me;<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.appealslawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/1090-32.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1090-32.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1239</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Virginia Roberts Deposition That Helped Expose Epstein And Maxwell (Part 7)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-virginia-roberts-deposition-that-helped-expose-epstein-and-maxwell-part-7--72930326</link><description><![CDATA[In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.<br /><br />Giuffre’s deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell’s direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein’s residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein’s private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell’s London townhouse, and at Epstein’s New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell’s role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell’s 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me;<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.appealslawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/1090-32.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1090-32.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72930326</guid><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 02:30:01 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72930326/vrobdepo7.mp3" length="17094991" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c847417c-c056-43d5-83c3-51f596025458/c847417c-c056-43d5-83c3-51f596025458.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c847417c-c056-43d5-83c3-51f596025458/c847417c-c056-43d5-83c3-51f596025458.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c847417c-c056-43d5-83c3-51f596025458/c847417c-c056-43d5-83c3-51f596025458.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.<br /><br />Giuffre’s deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell’s direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein’s residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein’s private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell’s London townhouse, and at Epstein’s New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell’s role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell’s 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me;<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.appealslawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/1090-32.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1090-32.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1069</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Virginia Roberts Deposition That Helped Expose Epstein And Maxwell (Part 6)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-virginia-roberts-deposition-that-helped-expose-epstein-and-maxwell-part-6--72930314</link><description><![CDATA[In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.<br /><br />Giuffre’s deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell’s direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein’s residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein’s private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell’s London townhouse, and at Epstein’s New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell’s role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell’s 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me;<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.appealslawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/1090-32.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1090-32.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72930314</guid><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 00:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72930314/vrobdepo6.mp3" length="14532483" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e872bba3-c99b-4e51-b8ea-161171c9b2a5/e872bba3-c99b-4e51-b8ea-161171c9b2a5.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e872bba3-c99b-4e51-b8ea-161171c9b2a5/e872bba3-c99b-4e51-b8ea-161171c9b2a5.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e872bba3-c99b-4e51-b8ea-161171c9b2a5/e872bba3-c99b-4e51-b8ea-161171c9b2a5.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.<br /><br />Giuffre’s deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell’s direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein’s residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein’s private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell’s London townhouse, and at Epstein’s New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell’s role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell’s 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me;<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.appealslawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/1090-32.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1090-32.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>909</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Virginia Roberts Deposition That Helped Expose Epstein And Maxwell (Part 5)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-virginia-roberts-deposition-that-helped-expose-epstein-and-maxwell-part-5--72930325</link><description><![CDATA[In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.<br /><br />Giuffre’s deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell’s direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein’s residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein’s private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell’s London townhouse, and at Epstein’s New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell’s role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell’s 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me;<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.appealslawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/1090-32.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1090-32.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72930325</guid><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 22:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72930325/vrobdepo5.mp3" length="14565920" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/37c40163-4463-4efa-9fc2-9159d8500212/37c40163-4463-4efa-9fc2-9159d8500212.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/37c40163-4463-4efa-9fc2-9159d8500212/37c40163-4463-4efa-9fc2-9159d8500212.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/37c40163-4463-4efa-9fc2-9159d8500212/37c40163-4463-4efa-9fc2-9159d8500212.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.<br /><br />Giuffre’s deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell’s direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein’s residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein’s private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell’s London townhouse, and at Epstein’s New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell’s role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell’s 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me;<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.appealslawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/1090-32.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1090-32.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>911</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Lesley Groff And The Transcript From Her Epstein Related Trip to Congress (Part 10) (7/12/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/lesley-groff-and-the-transcript-from-her-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-10-7-12-26--72938242</link><description><![CDATA[Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her central position was that Epstein kept her separated from his criminal life, that she never witnessed abuse, never had a victim disclose abuse to her, and did not knowingly help Epstein or Maxwell commit crimes. She described Epstein as a “master manipulator” who lied to her and kept his “legitimate” world apart from his abuse, while acknowledging that she scheduled massage appointments when Epstein provided names and numbers, sometimes circulated calendars that included those appointments early on, and understood the massages as routine at the time. She said she did not personally meet the massage providers, did not know they were minors or young women, and assumed they were masseuses, even though members pressed her on why an extremely wealthy man would use rotating names and phone numbers instead of a professional massage service.<br /><br />The questioning also focused heavily on Epstein’s network and whether Groff had knowledge of powerful men being provided access to girls or young women through Epstein or Maxwell. Groff repeatedly answered no when asked whether she had arranged massages for prominent figures, knew of sexual activity involving minors or young women, or knew of anyone who knowingly facilitated Epstein’s crimes. She acknowledged scheduling or connecting Epstein with high-profile contacts, including Prince Andrew, Ehud Barak, Larry Summers, George Mitchell, John Kerry, Wesley Clark, Bill Clinton-related circles, and Donald Trump phone calls, but denied arranging Trump travel during her employment and denied knowledge of Trump-related law enforcement communications. She also said she never suspected Epstein or Maxwell of working with any intelligence service. Overall, Groff’s testimony was defensive and narrow: she admitted to being part of the machinery that kept Epstein’s calendar and contacts moving, but insisted she never saw the criminal operation underneath it and never knowingly enabled it.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:  <br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72938242</guid><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 20:30:06 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72938242/grofftranscript10.mp3" length="12451884" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/bbeb1169-953d-4192-9913-44e269e77245/bbeb1169-953d-4192-9913-44e269e77245.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/bbeb1169-953d-4192-9913-44e269e77245/bbeb1169-953d-4192-9913-44e269e77245.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/bbeb1169-953d-4192-9913-44e269e77245/bbeb1169-953d-4192-9913-44e269e77245.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her central position was that Epstein kept her separated from his criminal life, that she never witnessed abuse, never had a victim disclose abuse to her, and did not knowingly help Epstein or Maxwell commit crimes. She described Epstein as a “master manipulator” who lied to her and kept his “legitimate” world apart from his abuse, while acknowledging that she scheduled massage appointments when Epstein provided names and numbers, sometimes circulated calendars that included those appointments early on, and understood the massages as routine at the time. She said she did not personally meet the massage providers, did not know they were minors or young women, and assumed they were masseuses, even though members pressed her on why an extremely wealthy man would use rotating names and phone numbers instead of a professional massage service.<br /><br />The questioning also focused heavily on Epstein’s network and whether Groff had knowledge of powerful men being provided access to girls or young women through Epstein or Maxwell. Groff repeatedly answered no when asked whether she had arranged massages for prominent figures, knew of sexual activity involving minors or young women, or knew of anyone who knowingly facilitated Epstein’s crimes. She acknowledged scheduling or connecting Epstein with high-profile contacts, including Prince Andrew, Ehud Barak, Larry Summers, George Mitchell, John Kerry, Wesley Clark, Bill Clinton-related circles, and Donald Trump phone calls, but denied arranging Trump travel during her employment and denied knowledge of Trump-related law enforcement communications. She also said she never suspected Epstein or Maxwell of working with any intelligence service. Overall, Groff’s testimony was defensive and narrow: she admitted to being part of the machinery that kept Epstein’s calendar and contacts moving, but insisted she never saw the criminal operation underneath it and never knowingly enabled it.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:  <br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>779</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Lesley Groff And The Transcript From Her Epstein Related Trip to Congress (Part 9) (7/12/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/lesley-groff-and-the-transcript-from-her-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-9-7-12-26--72938241</link><description><![CDATA[Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her central position was that Epstein kept her separated from his criminal life, that she never witnessed abuse, never had a victim disclose abuse to her, and did not knowingly help Epstein or Maxwell commit crimes. She described Epstein as a “master manipulator” who lied to her and kept his “legitimate” world apart from his abuse, while acknowledging that she scheduled massage appointments when Epstein provided names and numbers, sometimes circulated calendars that included those appointments early on, and understood the massages as routine at the time. She said she did not personally meet the massage providers, did not know they were minors or young women, and assumed they were masseuses, even though members pressed her on why an extremely wealthy man would use rotating names and phone numbers instead of a professional massage service.<br /><br />The questioning also focused heavily on Epstein’s network and whether Groff had knowledge of powerful men being provided access to girls or young women through Epstein or Maxwell. Groff repeatedly answered no when asked whether she had arranged massages for prominent figures, knew of sexual activity involving minors or young women, or knew of anyone who knowingly facilitated Epstein’s crimes. She acknowledged scheduling or connecting Epstein with high-profile contacts, including Prince Andrew, Ehud Barak, Larry Summers, George Mitchell, John Kerry, Wesley Clark, Bill Clinton-related circles, and Donald Trump phone calls, but denied arranging Trump travel during her employment and denied knowledge of Trump-related law enforcement communications. She also said she never suspected Epstein or Maxwell of working with any intelligence service. Overall, Groff’s testimony was defensive and narrow: she admitted to being part of the machinery that kept Epstein’s calendar and contacts moving, but insisted she never saw the criminal operation underneath it and never knowingly enabled it.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:  <br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72938241</guid><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 18:30:05 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72938241/grofftranscript9.mp3" length="12389608" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0216bf09-a627-47a2-978f-7880e7bb5569/0216bf09-a627-47a2-978f-7880e7bb5569.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0216bf09-a627-47a2-978f-7880e7bb5569/0216bf09-a627-47a2-978f-7880e7bb5569.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0216bf09-a627-47a2-978f-7880e7bb5569/0216bf09-a627-47a2-978f-7880e7bb5569.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her central position was that Epstein kept her separated from his criminal life, that she never witnessed abuse, never had a victim disclose abuse to her, and did not knowingly help Epstein or Maxwell commit crimes. She described Epstein as a “master manipulator” who lied to her and kept his “legitimate” world apart from his abuse, while acknowledging that she scheduled massage appointments when Epstein provided names and numbers, sometimes circulated calendars that included those appointments early on, and understood the massages as routine at the time. She said she did not personally meet the massage providers, did not know they were minors or young women, and assumed they were masseuses, even though members pressed her on why an extremely wealthy man would use rotating names and phone numbers instead of a professional massage service.<br /><br />The questioning also focused heavily on Epstein’s network and whether Groff had knowledge of powerful men being provided access to girls or young women through Epstein or Maxwell. Groff repeatedly answered no when asked whether she had arranged massages for prominent figures, knew of sexual activity involving minors or young women, or knew of anyone who knowingly facilitated Epstein’s crimes. She acknowledged scheduling or connecting Epstein with high-profile contacts, including Prince Andrew, Ehud Barak, Larry Summers, George Mitchell, John Kerry, Wesley Clark, Bill Clinton-related circles, and Donald Trump phone calls, but denied arranging Trump travel during her employment and denied knowledge of Trump-related law enforcement communications. She also said she never suspected Epstein or Maxwell of working with any intelligence service. Overall, Groff’s testimony was defensive and narrow: she admitted to being part of the machinery that kept Epstein’s calendar and contacts moving, but insisted she never saw the criminal operation underneath it and never knowingly enabled it.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:  <br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>775</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Lesley Groff And The Transcript From Her Epstein Related Trip to Congress (Part 8) (7/12/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/lesley-groff-and-the-transcript-from-her-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-8-7-12-26--72938240</link><description><![CDATA[Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her central position was that Epstein kept her separated from his criminal life, that she never witnessed abuse, never had a victim disclose abuse to her, and did not knowingly help Epstein or Maxwell commit crimes. She described Epstein as a “master manipulator” who lied to her and kept his “legitimate” world apart from his abuse, while acknowledging that she scheduled massage appointments when Epstein provided names and numbers, sometimes circulated calendars that included those appointments early on, and understood the massages as routine at the time. She said she did not personally meet the massage providers, did not know they were minors or young women, and assumed they were masseuses, even though members pressed her on why an extremely wealthy man would use rotating names and phone numbers instead of a professional massage service.<br /><br />The questioning also focused heavily on Epstein’s network and whether Groff had knowledge of powerful men being provided access to girls or young women through Epstein or Maxwell. Groff repeatedly answered no when asked whether she had arranged massages for prominent figures, knew of sexual activity involving minors or young women, or knew of anyone who knowingly facilitated Epstein’s crimes. She acknowledged scheduling or connecting Epstein with high-profile contacts, including Prince Andrew, Ehud Barak, Larry Summers, George Mitchell, John Kerry, Wesley Clark, Bill Clinton-related circles, and Donald Trump phone calls, but denied arranging Trump travel during her employment and denied knowledge of Trump-related law enforcement communications. She also said she never suspected Epstein or Maxwell of working with any intelligence service. Overall, Groff’s testimony was defensive and narrow: she admitted to being part of the machinery that kept Epstein’s calendar and contacts moving, but insisted she never saw the criminal operation underneath it and never knowingly enabled it.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:  <br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72938240</guid><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 16:30:05 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72938240/grofftranscript8.mp3" length="14947100" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/42c990a5-9e18-4592-bd60-fcdc911956c8/42c990a5-9e18-4592-bd60-fcdc911956c8.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/42c990a5-9e18-4592-bd60-fcdc911956c8/42c990a5-9e18-4592-bd60-fcdc911956c8.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/42c990a5-9e18-4592-bd60-fcdc911956c8/42c990a5-9e18-4592-bd60-fcdc911956c8.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her central position was that Epstein kept her separated from his criminal life, that she never witnessed abuse, never had a victim disclose abuse to her, and did not knowingly help Epstein or Maxwell commit crimes. She described Epstein as a “master manipulator” who lied to her and kept his “legitimate” world apart from his abuse, while acknowledging that she scheduled massage appointments when Epstein provided names and numbers, sometimes circulated calendars that included those appointments early on, and understood the massages as routine at the time. She said she did not personally meet the massage providers, did not know they were minors or young women, and assumed they were masseuses, even though members pressed her on why an extremely wealthy man would use rotating names and phone numbers instead of a professional massage service.<br /><br />The questioning also focused heavily on Epstein’s network and whether Groff had knowledge of powerful men being provided access to girls or young women through Epstein or Maxwell. Groff repeatedly answered no when asked whether she had arranged massages for prominent figures, knew of sexual activity involving minors or young women, or knew of anyone who knowingly facilitated Epstein’s crimes. She acknowledged scheduling or connecting Epstein with high-profile contacts, including Prince Andrew, Ehud Barak, Larry Summers, George Mitchell, John Kerry, Wesley Clark, Bill Clinton-related circles, and Donald Trump phone calls, but denied arranging Trump travel during her employment and denied knowledge of Trump-related law enforcement communications. She also said she never suspected Epstein or Maxwell of working with any intelligence service. Overall, Groff’s testimony was defensive and narrow: she admitted to being part of the machinery that kept Epstein’s calendar and contacts moving, but insisted she never saw the criminal operation underneath it and never knowingly enabled it.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:  <br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>935</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Jeffrey Epstein's Inner Circle And The Motivations That Drove Them (7/12/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-s-inner-circle-and-the-motivations-that-drove-them-7-12-26--72931828</link><description><![CDATA[<br />The psyche behind the people who enabled Jeffrey Epstein was built on a toxic mix of ambition, cowardice, greed, access, and moral compartmentalization. Epstein surrounded himself with people who either wanted something from him, feared losing something because of him, or convinced themselves that the obvious ugliness around him was not their problem to confront. For some, he was a gateway to money, power, introductions, donations, jobs, private travel, elite circles, and proximity to billionaires, politicians, academics, royalty, and Wall Street operators. For others, he was simply useful, and usefulness became the excuse that swallowed every red flag. They did not need to believe he was innocent; they only needed to believe that staying close to him was more valuable than asking hard questions. That is the psychology of enablement: not always blind loyalty, but deliberate self-protection dressed up as ignorance, discretion, professionalism, or “I only handled logistics.”<br /><br />What made Epstein’s world so durable was that every enabler could shrink their own role until it felt survivable. The banker could say he only handled accounts. The lawyer could say he only gave advice. The assistant could say she only scheduled meetings. The socialite could say she only made introductions. The institution could say compliance missed something. The powerful friend could say he barely knew him. And together, all of those little evasions created the infrastructure that allowed the abuse to continue. Epstein exploited that weakness perfectly, because he understood that elite environments often do not require people to be openly evil; they only require people to be useful, quiet, and ambitious enough to look away. The real horror is that his operation did not survive because one monster acted alone. It survived because too many people decided that their comfort, career, status, money, and access mattered more than the girls and young women being harmed right in front of them.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72931828</guid><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 14:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72931828/megaepsteinandthepsychologyofthosewhohelpedhim.mp3" length="47422946" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9228f15b-56f3-49b5-8bdb-dede4f82fa64/9228f15b-56f3-49b5-8bdb-dede4f82fa64.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9228f15b-56f3-49b5-8bdb-dede4f82fa64/9228f15b-56f3-49b5-8bdb-dede4f82fa64.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9228f15b-56f3-49b5-8bdb-dede4f82fa64/9228f15b-56f3-49b5-8bdb-dede4f82fa64.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The psyche behind the people who enabled Jeffrey Epstein was built on a toxic mix of ambition, cowardice, greed, access, and moral compartmentalization. Epstein surrounded himself with people who either wanted something from him, feared losing...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br />The psyche behind the people who enabled Jeffrey Epstein was built on a toxic mix of ambition, cowardice, greed, access, and moral compartmentalization. Epstein surrounded himself with people who either wanted something from him, feared losing something because of him, or convinced themselves that the obvious ugliness around him was not their problem to confront. For some, he was a gateway to money, power, introductions, donations, jobs, private travel, elite circles, and proximity to billionaires, politicians, academics, royalty, and Wall Street operators. For others, he was simply useful, and usefulness became the excuse that swallowed every red flag. They did not need to believe he was innocent; they only needed to believe that staying close to him was more valuable than asking hard questions. That is the psychology of enablement: not always blind loyalty, but deliberate self-protection dressed up as ignorance, discretion, professionalism, or “I only handled logistics.”<br /><br />What made Epstein’s world so durable was that every enabler could shrink their own role until it felt survivable. The banker could say he only handled accounts. The lawyer could say he only gave advice. The assistant could say she only scheduled meetings. The socialite could say she only made introductions. The institution could say compliance missed something. The powerful friend could say he barely knew him. And together, all of those little evasions created the infrastructure that allowed the abuse to continue. Epstein exploited that weakness perfectly, because he understood that elite environments often do not require people to be openly evil; they only require people to be useful, quiet, and ambitious enough to look away. The real horror is that his operation did not survive because one monster acted alone. It survived because too many people decided that their comfort, career, status, money, and access mattered more than the girls and young women being harmed right in front of them.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2964</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   Why Won't Congress Chase The Epstein Money Trail?  (7/12/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-why-won-t-congress-chase-the-epstein-money-trail-7-12-26--72931827</link><description><![CDATA[Congress has treated the Epstein money trail like a side corridor instead of the main road, and that is the core failure. There have been moves in the right direction — House Oversight sought suspicious activity reports from Treasury, Democrats pushed for subpoenas to major financial institutions, and Chairman James Comer later subpoenaed JPMorgan and Deutsche Bank for Epstein-related financial records — but the pace and posture have never matched the scale of what the money could reveal. Epstein’s operation was not just private jets, mansions, phone books, and social access; it was banking access, wire transfers, shell structures, settlement money, tax maneuvers, professional-services payments, suspicious activity flags, and elite institutional tolerance. JPMorgan already settled a survivor lawsuit for $290 million, Deutsche Bank was previously fined over its Epstein failures, and Leon Black’s payments to Epstein have remained one of the most glaring unresolved financial questions around the case. Yet Congress has too often preferred the safer theater of testimony, document dumps, political name-checking, and public outrage instead of building a relentless financial map of who paid Epstein, who was paid by Epstein, who moved the money, who ignored the red flags, and who benefited from the silence.<br /><br />That avoidance matters because the money trail is where the cover story starts to collapse. Flight logs tell you who was around him, calendars tell you who had access to him, but financial records tell you who enabled him, who profited from him, who kept him liquid, who looked the other way, and who may have had a direct stake in keeping the full story buried. Congress has shown bursts of interest, including pressure around Leon Black and subpoenas after reports that he resisted questions tied to nondisclosure agreements, but the overall approach has still lacked the kind of prosecutorial ferocity the case demands. A serious investigation would not merely ask banks and billionaires polite questions; it would follow every suspicious activity report, every post-conviction transaction, every professional-services payment, every unexplained fee, every Epstein-linked entity, and every institution that decided his money was clean enough to touch. Instead, the financial side has been allowed to sit behind the spectacle, as if the public should be satisfied with hearings and headlines while the machinery that made Epstein possible remains only partially exposed. And until Congress chases that machinery with real hunger, the Epstein investigation will remain incomplete by design.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72931827</guid><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 12:30:05 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72931827/megacongressrefusestochaseepsteinbankrecords.mp3" length="47621477" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a663654a-4c94-40e2-9e75-33212a4d98f8/a663654a-4c94-40e2-9e75-33212a4d98f8.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a663654a-4c94-40e2-9e75-33212a4d98f8/a663654a-4c94-40e2-9e75-33212a4d98f8.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a663654a-4c94-40e2-9e75-33212a4d98f8/a663654a-4c94-40e2-9e75-33212a4d98f8.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Congress has treated the Epstein money trail like a side corridor instead of the main road, and that is the core failure. There have been moves in the right direction — House Oversight sought suspicious activity reports from Treasury, Democrats pushed...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Congress has treated the Epstein money trail like a side corridor instead of the main road, and that is the core failure. There have been moves in the right direction — House Oversight sought suspicious activity reports from Treasury, Democrats pushed for subpoenas to major financial institutions, and Chairman James Comer later subpoenaed JPMorgan and Deutsche Bank for Epstein-related financial records — but the pace and posture have never matched the scale of what the money could reveal. Epstein’s operation was not just private jets, mansions, phone books, and social access; it was banking access, wire transfers, shell structures, settlement money, tax maneuvers, professional-services payments, suspicious activity flags, and elite institutional tolerance. JPMorgan already settled a survivor lawsuit for $290 million, Deutsche Bank was previously fined over its Epstein failures, and Leon Black’s payments to Epstein have remained one of the most glaring unresolved financial questions around the case. Yet Congress has too often preferred the safer theater of testimony, document dumps, political name-checking, and public outrage instead of building a relentless financial map of who paid Epstein, who was paid by Epstein, who moved the money, who ignored the red flags, and who benefited from the silence.<br /><br />That avoidance matters because the money trail is where the cover story starts to collapse. Flight logs tell you who was around him, calendars tell you who had access to him, but financial records tell you who enabled him, who profited from him, who kept him liquid, who looked the other way, and who may have had a direct stake in keeping the full story buried. Congress has shown bursts of interest, including pressure around Leon Black and subpoenas after reports that he resisted questions tied to nondisclosure agreements, but the overall approach has still lacked the kind of prosecutorial ferocity the case demands. A serious investigation would not merely ask banks and billionaires polite questions; it would follow every suspicious activity report, every post-conviction transaction, every professional-services payment, every unexplained fee, every Epstein-linked entity, and every institution that decided his money was clean enough to touch. Instead, the financial side has been allowed to sit behind the spectacle, as if the public should be satisfied with hearings and headlines while the machinery that made Epstein possible remains only partially exposed. And until Congress chases that machinery with real hunger, the Epstein investigation will remain incomplete by design.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2977</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Howard Lutnick And His Trip To Congress (Part 8-10) (7/12/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-howard-lutnick-and-his-trip-to-congress-part-8-10-7-12-26--72931824</link><description><![CDATA[<br /><br /><br />The transcripts from Howard Lutnick’s closed-door appearance before Congress painted a picture of a witness trying to minimize both the depth and duration of his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein while lawmakers confronted him with records suggesting far more contact than he had previously acknowledged. Lutnick repeatedly described his interactions with Epstein as “inconsequential,” insisting he only met with him a handful of times and claiming he cut ties after a disturbing 2005 interaction inside Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse. According to the testimony, Lutnick said Epstein made sexually suggestive comments about massages during that visit, which he claimed immediately disgusted both him and his wife. However, members of the House Oversight Committee confronted him with emails, schedules, and business records showing contact continuing years after Epstein’s 2008 conviction, including meetings at Epstein’s townhouse, discussions involving a shared business venture, and a 2012 lunch visit to Epstein’s private island alongside Lutnick’s family<br /><br />The transcripts also showed lawmakers growing increasingly frustrated with what they viewed as evasive answers and shifting explanations from Lutnick as more documentation was placed in front of him. Democrats in particular accused him of misleading the public for years about the true extent of the relationship, especially after previously portraying Epstein as little more than a casual acquaintance. Lutnick attempted to explain away the continued contact by claiming the encounters were brief, social, or business-related and that he never witnessed any criminal behavior or saw underage girls around Epstein. He also reportedly walked back previous public comments suggesting Epstein blackmailed powerful people, telling lawmakers he had only been speculating and had no firsthand knowledge of such activity. Republicans on the committee largely defended Lutnick and argued Democrats were trying to weaponize the hearing politically, while critics argued the testimony further demonstrated how many powerful figures continued associating with Epstein long after his criminal conduct was already publicly known.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://assets.newsweek.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Lutnick-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">HGO126550 Lutnick Draft-pdf2_Redacted-Update_RedactedV3.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72931824</guid><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 10:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72931824/34f6f228_0fc2_4dd9_8a4a_142b216f8368.mp3" length="49170016" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3c875dc1-97b1-44e0-a039-5be1c8382cb6/3c875dc1-97b1-44e0-a039-5be1c8382cb6.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3c875dc1-97b1-44e0-a039-5be1c8382cb6/3c875dc1-97b1-44e0-a039-5be1c8382cb6.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3c875dc1-97b1-44e0-a039-5be1c8382cb6/3c875dc1-97b1-44e0-a039-5be1c8382cb6.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The transcripts from Howard Lutnick’s closed-door appearance before Congress painted a picture of a witness trying to minimize both the depth and duration of his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein while lawmakers confronted him with records suggesting...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br /><br /><br />The transcripts from Howard Lutnick’s closed-door appearance before Congress painted a picture of a witness trying to minimize both the depth and duration of his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein while lawmakers confronted him with records suggesting far more contact than he had previously acknowledged. Lutnick repeatedly described his interactions with Epstein as “inconsequential,” insisting he only met with him a handful of times and claiming he cut ties after a disturbing 2005 interaction inside Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse. According to the testimony, Lutnick said Epstein made sexually suggestive comments about massages during that visit, which he claimed immediately disgusted both him and his wife. However, members of the House Oversight Committee confronted him with emails, schedules, and business records showing contact continuing years after Epstein’s 2008 conviction, including meetings at Epstein’s townhouse, discussions involving a shared business venture, and a 2012 lunch visit to Epstein’s private island alongside Lutnick’s family<br /><br />The transcripts also showed lawmakers growing increasingly frustrated with what they viewed as evasive answers and shifting explanations from Lutnick as more documentation was placed in front of him. Democrats in particular accused him of misleading the public for years about the true extent of the relationship, especially after previously portraying Epstein as little more than a casual acquaintance. Lutnick attempted to explain away the continued contact by claiming the encounters were brief, social, or business-related and that he never witnessed any criminal behavior or saw underage girls around Epstein. He also reportedly walked back previous public comments suggesting Epstein blackmailed powerful people, telling lawmakers he had only been speculating and had no firsthand knowledge of such activity. Republicans on the committee largely defended Lutnick and argued Democrats were trying to weaponize the hearing politically, while critics argued the testimony further demonstrated how many powerful figures continued associating with Epstein long after his criminal conduct was already publicly known.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://assets.newsweek.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Lutnick-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">HGO126550 Lutnick Draft-pdf2_Redacted-Update_RedactedV3.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3074</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Howard Lutnick And His Trip To Congress (Part 4-7) (7/12/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-howard-lutnick-and-his-trip-to-congress-part-4-7-7-12-26--72931825</link><description><![CDATA[<br /><br /><br />The transcripts from Howard Lutnick’s closed-door appearance before Congress painted a picture of a witness trying to minimize both the depth and duration of his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein while lawmakers confronted him with records suggesting far more contact than he had previously acknowledged. Lutnick repeatedly described his interactions with Epstein as “inconsequential,” insisting he only met with him a handful of times and claiming he cut ties after a disturbing 2005 interaction inside Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse. According to the testimony, Lutnick said Epstein made sexually suggestive comments about massages during that visit, which he claimed immediately disgusted both him and his wife. However, members of the House Oversight Committee confronted him with emails, schedules, and business records showing contact continuing years after Epstein’s 2008 conviction, including meetings at Epstein’s townhouse, discussions involving a shared business venture, and a 2012 lunch visit to Epstein’s private island alongside Lutnick’s family<br /><br />The transcripts also showed lawmakers growing increasingly frustrated with what they viewed as evasive answers and shifting explanations from Lutnick as more documentation was placed in front of him. Democrats in particular accused him of misleading the public for years about the true extent of the relationship, especially after previously portraying Epstein as little more than a casual acquaintance. Lutnick attempted to explain away the continued contact by claiming the encounters were brief, social, or business-related and that he never witnessed any criminal behavior or saw underage girls around Epstein. He also reportedly walked back previous public comments suggesting Epstein blackmailed powerful people, telling lawmakers he had only been speculating and had no firsthand knowledge of such activity. Republicans on the committee largely defended Lutnick and argued Democrats were trying to weaponize the hearing politically, while critics argued the testimony further demonstrated how many powerful figures continued associating with Epstein long after his criminal conduct was already publicly known.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://assets.newsweek.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Lutnick-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">HGO126550 Lutnick Draft-pdf2_Redacted-Update_RedactedV3.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72931825</guid><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 08:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72931825/308bc216_057d_4dda_bc80_c7b904171884.mp3" length="51545278" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9809ff1f-8ecc-4e93-90dc-e3fe31044962/9809ff1f-8ecc-4e93-90dc-e3fe31044962.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9809ff1f-8ecc-4e93-90dc-e3fe31044962/9809ff1f-8ecc-4e93-90dc-e3fe31044962.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9809ff1f-8ecc-4e93-90dc-e3fe31044962/9809ff1f-8ecc-4e93-90dc-e3fe31044962.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The transcripts from Howard Lutnick’s closed-door appearance before Congress painted a picture of a witness trying to minimize both the depth and duration of his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein while lawmakers confronted him with records suggesting...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br /><br /><br />The transcripts from Howard Lutnick’s closed-door appearance before Congress painted a picture of a witness trying to minimize both the depth and duration of his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein while lawmakers confronted him with records suggesting far more contact than he had previously acknowledged. Lutnick repeatedly described his interactions with Epstein as “inconsequential,” insisting he only met with him a handful of times and claiming he cut ties after a disturbing 2005 interaction inside Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse. According to the testimony, Lutnick said Epstein made sexually suggestive comments about massages during that visit, which he claimed immediately disgusted both him and his wife. However, members of the House Oversight Committee confronted him with emails, schedules, and business records showing contact continuing years after Epstein’s 2008 conviction, including meetings at Epstein’s townhouse, discussions involving a shared business venture, and a 2012 lunch visit to Epstein’s private island alongside Lutnick’s family<br /><br />The transcripts also showed lawmakers growing increasingly frustrated with what they viewed as evasive answers and shifting explanations from Lutnick as more documentation was placed in front of him. Democrats in particular accused him of misleading the public for years about the true extent of the relationship, especially after previously portraying Epstein as little more than a casual acquaintance. Lutnick attempted to explain away the continued contact by claiming the encounters were brief, social, or business-related and that he never witnessed any criminal behavior or saw underage girls around Epstein. He also reportedly walked back previous public comments suggesting Epstein blackmailed powerful people, telling lawmakers he had only been speculating and had no firsthand knowledge of such activity. Republicans on the committee largely defended Lutnick and argued Democrats were trying to weaponize the hearing politically, while critics argued the testimony further demonstrated how many powerful figures continued associating with Epstein long after his criminal conduct was already publicly known.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://assets.newsweek.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Lutnick-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">HGO126550 Lutnick Draft-pdf2_Redacted-Update_RedactedV3.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3222</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Howard Lutnick And His Trip To Congress (Part 1-3) (7/11/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-howard-lutnick-and-his-trip-to-congress-part-1-3-7-11-26--72931826</link><description><![CDATA[<br /><br /><br />The transcripts from Howard Lutnick’s closed-door appearance before Congress painted a picture of a witness trying to minimize both the depth and duration of his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein while lawmakers confronted him with records suggesting far more contact than he had previously acknowledged. Lutnick repeatedly described his interactions with Epstein as “inconsequential,” insisting he only met with him a handful of times and claiming he cut ties after a disturbing 2005 interaction inside Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse. According to the testimony, Lutnick said Epstein made sexually suggestive comments about massages during that visit, which he claimed immediately disgusted both him and his wife. However, members of the House Oversight Committee confronted him with emails, schedules, and business records showing contact continuing years after Epstein’s 2008 conviction, including meetings at Epstein’s townhouse, discussions involving a shared business venture, and a 2012 lunch visit to Epstein’s private island alongside Lutnick’s family<br /><br />The transcripts also showed lawmakers growing increasingly frustrated with what they viewed as evasive answers and shifting explanations from Lutnick as more documentation was placed in front of him. Democrats in particular accused him of misleading the public for years about the true extent of the relationship, especially after previously portraying Epstein as little more than a casual acquaintance. Lutnick attempted to explain away the continued contact by claiming the encounters were brief, social, or business-related and that he never witnessed any criminal behavior or saw underage girls around Epstein. He also reportedly walked back previous public comments suggesting Epstein blackmailed powerful people, telling lawmakers he had only been speculating and had no firsthand knowledge of such activity. Republicans on the committee largely defended Lutnick and argued Democrats were trying to weaponize the hearing politically, while critics argued the testimony further demonstrated how many powerful figures continued associating with Epstein long after his criminal conduct was already publicly known.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://assets.newsweek.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Lutnick-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">HGO126550 Lutnick Draft-pdf2_Redacted-Update_RedactedV3.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72931826</guid><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72931826/a8a53831_6437_4779_8283_aaf96a605cbd.mp3" length="40378662" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a1da6c8c-de96-4ed4-be8b-f24027102165/a1da6c8c-de96-4ed4-be8b-f24027102165.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a1da6c8c-de96-4ed4-be8b-f24027102165/a1da6c8c-de96-4ed4-be8b-f24027102165.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a1da6c8c-de96-4ed4-be8b-f24027102165/a1da6c8c-de96-4ed4-be8b-f24027102165.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The transcripts from Howard Lutnick’s closed-door appearance before Congress painted a picture of a witness trying to minimize both the depth and duration of his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein while lawmakers confronted him with records suggesting...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br /><br /><br />The transcripts from Howard Lutnick’s closed-door appearance before Congress painted a picture of a witness trying to minimize both the depth and duration of his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein while lawmakers confronted him with records suggesting far more contact than he had previously acknowledged. Lutnick repeatedly described his interactions with Epstein as “inconsequential,” insisting he only met with him a handful of times and claiming he cut ties after a disturbing 2005 interaction inside Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse. According to the testimony, Lutnick said Epstein made sexually suggestive comments about massages during that visit, which he claimed immediately disgusted both him and his wife. However, members of the House Oversight Committee confronted him with emails, schedules, and business records showing contact continuing years after Epstein’s 2008 conviction, including meetings at Epstein’s townhouse, discussions involving a shared business venture, and a 2012 lunch visit to Epstein’s private island alongside Lutnick’s family<br /><br />The transcripts also showed lawmakers growing increasingly frustrated with what they viewed as evasive answers and shifting explanations from Lutnick as more documentation was placed in front of him. Democrats in particular accused him of misleading the public for years about the true extent of the relationship, especially after previously portraying Epstein as little more than a casual acquaintance. Lutnick attempted to explain away the continued contact by claiming the encounters were brief, social, or business-related and that he never witnessed any criminal behavior or saw underage girls around Epstein. He also reportedly walked back previous public comments suggesting Epstein blackmailed powerful people, telling lawmakers he had only been speculating and had no firsthand knowledge of such activity. Republicans on the committee largely defended Lutnick and argued Democrats were trying to weaponize the hearing politically, while critics argued the testimony further demonstrated how many powerful figures continued associating with Epstein long after his criminal conduct was already publicly known.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://assets.newsweek.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Lutnick-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">HGO126550 Lutnick Draft-pdf2_Redacted-Update_RedactedV3.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2524</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Virginia Roberts Deposition That Helped Expose Epstein And Maxwell (Part 4)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-virginia-roberts-deposition-that-helped-expose-epstein-and-maxwell-part-4--72930323</link><description><![CDATA[In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.<br /><br />Giuffre’s deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell’s direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein’s residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein’s private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell’s London townhouse, and at Epstein’s New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell’s role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell’s 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me;<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.appealslawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/1090-32.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1090-32.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72930323</guid><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 04:30:05 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72930323/vrobdepo4.mp3" length="17408043" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c90ea683-334e-47e3-a4ea-38fff5754708/c90ea683-334e-47e3-a4ea-38fff5754708.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c90ea683-334e-47e3-a4ea-38fff5754708/c90ea683-334e-47e3-a4ea-38fff5754708.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c90ea683-334e-47e3-a4ea-38fff5754708/c90ea683-334e-47e3-a4ea-38fff5754708.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.<br /><br />Giuffre’s deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell’s direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein’s residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein’s private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell’s London townhouse, and at Epstein’s New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell’s role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell’s 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me;<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.appealslawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/1090-32.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1090-32.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1088</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Virginia Roberts Deposition That Helped Expose Epstein And Maxwell (Part 3)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-virginia-roberts-deposition-that-helped-expose-epstein-and-maxwell-part-3--72930329</link><description><![CDATA[In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.<br /><br />Giuffre’s deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell’s direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein’s residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein’s private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell’s London townhouse, and at Epstein’s New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell’s role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell’s 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me;<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.appealslawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/1090-32.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1090-32.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72930329</guid><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 02:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72930329/vrobdepo3.mp3" length="16078514" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/505621a7-452b-4cb4-b96c-925de5c4def4/505621a7-452b-4cb4-b96c-925de5c4def4.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/505621a7-452b-4cb4-b96c-925de5c4def4/505621a7-452b-4cb4-b96c-925de5c4def4.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/505621a7-452b-4cb4-b96c-925de5c4def4/505621a7-452b-4cb4-b96c-925de5c4def4.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.<br /><br />Giuffre’s deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell’s direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein’s residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein’s private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell’s London townhouse, and at Epstein’s New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell’s role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell’s 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me;<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.appealslawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/1090-32.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1090-32.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1005</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Virginia Roberts Deposition That Helped Expose Epstein And Maxwell (Part 2)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-virginia-roberts-deposition-that-helped-expose-epstein-and-maxwell-part-2--72930322</link><description><![CDATA[In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.<br /><br />Giuffre’s deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell’s direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein’s residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein’s private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell’s London townhouse, and at Epstein’s New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell’s role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell’s 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me;<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.appealslawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/1090-32.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1090-32.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72930322</guid><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 00:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72930322/vrobdepo2.mp3" length="13264813" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3ef09613-e11b-4144-b531-bdab70571934/3ef09613-e11b-4144-b531-bdab70571934.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3ef09613-e11b-4144-b531-bdab70571934/3ef09613-e11b-4144-b531-bdab70571934.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3ef09613-e11b-4144-b531-bdab70571934/3ef09613-e11b-4144-b531-bdab70571934.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.<br /><br />Giuffre’s deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell’s direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein’s residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein’s private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell’s London townhouse, and at Epstein’s New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell’s role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell’s 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me;<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.appealslawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/1090-32.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1090-32.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>830</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Virginia Roberts Deposition That Helped Expose Epstein And Maxwell (Part 1)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-virginia-roberts-deposition-that-helped-expose-epstein-and-maxwell-part-1--72930321</link><description><![CDATA[In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.<br /><br />Giuffre’s deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell’s direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein’s residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein’s private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell’s London townhouse, and at Epstein’s New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell’s role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell’s 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me;<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.appealslawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/1090-32.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1090-32.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72930321</guid><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72930321/vrobdepo1.mp3" length="21446364" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cfb15512-12c1-49a5-9516-bc99276a995c/cfb15512-12c1-49a5-9516-bc99276a995c.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cfb15512-12c1-49a5-9516-bc99276a995c/cfb15512-12c1-49a5-9516-bc99276a995c.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cfb15512-12c1-49a5-9516-bc99276a995c/cfb15512-12c1-49a5-9516-bc99276a995c.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.<br /><br />Giuffre’s deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell’s direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein’s residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein’s private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell’s London townhouse, and at Epstein’s New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell’s role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell’s 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me;<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.appealslawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/1090-32.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1090-32.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1341</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Lesley Groff And The Transcript From Her Epstein Related Trip to Congress (Part 7) (7/11/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/lesley-groff-and-the-transcript-from-her-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-7-7-11-26--72930290</link><description><![CDATA[Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her central position was that Epstein kept her separated from his criminal life, that she never witnessed abuse, never had a victim disclose abuse to her, and did not knowingly help Epstein or Maxwell commit crimes. She described Epstein as a “master manipulator” who lied to her and kept his “legitimate” world apart from his abuse, while acknowledging that she scheduled massage appointments when Epstein provided names and numbers, sometimes circulated calendars that included those appointments early on, and understood the massages as routine at the time. She said she did not personally meet the massage providers, did not know they were minors or young women, and assumed they were masseuses, even though members pressed her on why an extremely wealthy man would use rotating names and phone numbers instead of a professional massage service.<br /><br />The questioning also focused heavily on Epstein’s network and whether Groff had knowledge of powerful men being provided access to girls or young women through Epstein or Maxwell. Groff repeatedly answered no when asked whether she had arranged massages for prominent figures, knew of sexual activity involving minors or young women, or knew of anyone who knowingly facilitated Epstein’s crimes. She acknowledged scheduling or connecting Epstein with high-profile contacts, including Prince Andrew, Ehud Barak, Larry Summers, George Mitchell, John Kerry, Wesley Clark, Bill Clinton-related circles, and Donald Trump phone calls, but denied arranging Trump travel during her employment and denied knowledge of Trump-related law enforcement communications. She also said she never suspected Epstein or Maxwell of working with any intelligence service. Overall, Groff’s testimony was defensive and narrow: she admitted to being part of the machinery that kept Epstein’s calendar and contacts moving, but insisted she never saw the criminal operation underneath it and never knowingly enabled it.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:  <br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72930290</guid><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 20:30:05 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72930290/grofftranscript7.mp3" length="11239384" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/260cb919-b428-49fc-b3d9-56b00fc395ad/260cb919-b428-49fc-b3d9-56b00fc395ad.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/260cb919-b428-49fc-b3d9-56b00fc395ad/260cb919-b428-49fc-b3d9-56b00fc395ad.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/260cb919-b428-49fc-b3d9-56b00fc395ad/260cb919-b428-49fc-b3d9-56b00fc395ad.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her central position was that Epstein kept her separated from his criminal life, that she never witnessed abuse, never had a victim disclose abuse to her, and did not knowingly help Epstein or Maxwell commit crimes. She described Epstein as a “master manipulator” who lied to her and kept his “legitimate” world apart from his abuse, while acknowledging that she scheduled massage appointments when Epstein provided names and numbers, sometimes circulated calendars that included those appointments early on, and understood the massages as routine at the time. She said she did not personally meet the massage providers, did not know they were minors or young women, and assumed they were masseuses, even though members pressed her on why an extremely wealthy man would use rotating names and phone numbers instead of a professional massage service.<br /><br />The questioning also focused heavily on Epstein’s network and whether Groff had knowledge of powerful men being provided access to girls or young women through Epstein or Maxwell. Groff repeatedly answered no when asked whether she had arranged massages for prominent figures, knew of sexual activity involving minors or young women, or knew of anyone who knowingly facilitated Epstein’s crimes. She acknowledged scheduling or connecting Epstein with high-profile contacts, including Prince Andrew, Ehud Barak, Larry Summers, George Mitchell, John Kerry, Wesley Clark, Bill Clinton-related circles, and Donald Trump phone calls, but denied arranging Trump travel during her employment and denied knowledge of Trump-related law enforcement communications. She also said she never suspected Epstein or Maxwell of working with any intelligence service. Overall, Groff’s testimony was defensive and narrow: she admitted to being part of the machinery that kept Epstein’s calendar and contacts moving, but insisted she never saw the criminal operation underneath it and never knowingly enabled it.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:  <br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>703</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Lesley Groff And The Transcript From Her Epstein Related Trip to Congress (Part 6) (7/11/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/lesley-groff-and-the-transcript-from-her-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-6-7-11-26--72930285</link><description><![CDATA[Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her central position was that Epstein kept her separated from his criminal life, that she never witnessed abuse, never had a victim disclose abuse to her, and did not knowingly help Epstein or Maxwell commit crimes. She described Epstein as a “master manipulator” who lied to her and kept his “legitimate” world apart from his abuse, while acknowledging that she scheduled massage appointments when Epstein provided names and numbers, sometimes circulated calendars that included those appointments early on, and understood the massages as routine at the time. She said she did not personally meet the massage providers, did not know they were minors or young women, and assumed they were masseuses, even though members pressed her on why an extremely wealthy man would use rotating names and phone numbers instead of a professional massage service.<br /><br />The questioning also focused heavily on Epstein’s network and whether Groff had knowledge of powerful men being provided access to girls or young women through Epstein or Maxwell. Groff repeatedly answered no when asked whether she had arranged massages for prominent figures, knew of sexual activity involving minors or young women, or knew of anyone who knowingly facilitated Epstein’s crimes. She acknowledged scheduling or connecting Epstein with high-profile contacts, including Prince Andrew, Ehud Barak, Larry Summers, George Mitchell, John Kerry, Wesley Clark, Bill Clinton-related circles, and Donald Trump phone calls, but denied arranging Trump travel during her employment and denied knowledge of Trump-related law enforcement communications. She also said she never suspected Epstein or Maxwell of working with any intelligence service. Overall, Groff’s testimony was defensive and narrow: she admitted to being part of the machinery that kept Epstein’s calendar and contacts moving, but insisted she never saw the criminal operation underneath it and never knowingly enabled it.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:  <br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72930285</guid><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 18:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72930285/grofftranscript6.mp3" length="13574522" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/21903857-2301-4c0c-8940-1bf228582478/21903857-2301-4c0c-8940-1bf228582478.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/21903857-2301-4c0c-8940-1bf228582478/21903857-2301-4c0c-8940-1bf228582478.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/21903857-2301-4c0c-8940-1bf228582478/21903857-2301-4c0c-8940-1bf228582478.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her central position was that Epstein kept her separated from his criminal life, that she never witnessed abuse, never had a victim disclose abuse to her, and did not knowingly help Epstein or Maxwell commit crimes. She described Epstein as a “master manipulator” who lied to her and kept his “legitimate” world apart from his abuse, while acknowledging that she scheduled massage appointments when Epstein provided names and numbers, sometimes circulated calendars that included those appointments early on, and understood the massages as routine at the time. She said she did not personally meet the massage providers, did not know they were minors or young women, and assumed they were masseuses, even though members pressed her on why an extremely wealthy man would use rotating names and phone numbers instead of a professional massage service.<br /><br />The questioning also focused heavily on Epstein’s network and whether Groff had knowledge of powerful men being provided access to girls or young women through Epstein or Maxwell. Groff repeatedly answered no when asked whether she had arranged massages for prominent figures, knew of sexual activity involving minors or young women, or knew of anyone who knowingly facilitated Epstein’s crimes. She acknowledged scheduling or connecting Epstein with high-profile contacts, including Prince Andrew, Ehud Barak, Larry Summers, George Mitchell, John Kerry, Wesley Clark, Bill Clinton-related circles, and Donald Trump phone calls, but denied arranging Trump travel during her employment and denied knowledge of Trump-related law enforcement communications. She also said she never suspected Epstein or Maxwell of working with any intelligence service. Overall, Groff’s testimony was defensive and narrow: she admitted to being part of the machinery that kept Epstein’s calendar and contacts moving, but insisted she never saw the criminal operation underneath it and never knowingly enabled it.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:  <br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>849</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Lesley Groff And The Transcript From Her Epstein Related Trip to Congress (Part 5) (7/11/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/lesley-groff-and-the-transcript-from-her-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-5-7-11-26--72930284</link><description><![CDATA[Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her central position was that Epstein kept her separated from his criminal life, that she never witnessed abuse, never had a victim disclose abuse to her, and did not knowingly help Epstein or Maxwell commit crimes. She described Epstein as a “master manipulator” who lied to her and kept his “legitimate” world apart from his abuse, while acknowledging that she scheduled massage appointments when Epstein provided names and numbers, sometimes circulated calendars that included those appointments early on, and understood the massages as routine at the time. She said she did not personally meet the massage providers, did not know they were minors or young women, and assumed they were masseuses, even though members pressed her on why an extremely wealthy man would use rotating names and phone numbers instead of a professional massage service.<br /><br />The questioning also focused heavily on Epstein’s network and whether Groff had knowledge of powerful men being provided access to girls or young women through Epstein or Maxwell. Groff repeatedly answered no when asked whether she had arranged massages for prominent figures, knew of sexual activity involving minors or young women, or knew of anyone who knowingly facilitated Epstein’s crimes. She acknowledged scheduling or connecting Epstein with high-profile contacts, including Prince Andrew, Ehud Barak, Larry Summers, George Mitchell, John Kerry, Wesley Clark, Bill Clinton-related circles, and Donald Trump phone calls, but denied arranging Trump travel during her employment and denied knowledge of Trump-related law enforcement communications. She also said she never suspected Epstein or Maxwell of working with any intelligence service. Overall, Groff’s testimony was defensive and narrow: she admitted to being part of the machinery that kept Epstein’s calendar and contacts moving, but insisted she never saw the criminal operation underneath it and never knowingly enabled it.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:  <br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72930284</guid><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 16:28:43 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72930284/grofftranscript5.mp3" length="12067779" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2bbbd50a-2ac5-4c10-8226-1e68361e71fd/2bbbd50a-2ac5-4c10-8226-1e68361e71fd.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2bbbd50a-2ac5-4c10-8226-1e68361e71fd/2bbbd50a-2ac5-4c10-8226-1e68361e71fd.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2bbbd50a-2ac5-4c10-8226-1e68361e71fd/2bbbd50a-2ac5-4c10-8226-1e68361e71fd.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her central position was that Epstein kept her separated from his criminal life, that she never witnessed abuse, never had a victim disclose abuse to her, and did not knowingly help Epstein or Maxwell commit crimes. She described Epstein as a “master manipulator” who lied to her and kept his “legitimate” world apart from his abuse, while acknowledging that she scheduled massage appointments when Epstein provided names and numbers, sometimes circulated calendars that included those appointments early on, and understood the massages as routine at the time. She said she did not personally meet the massage providers, did not know they were minors or young women, and assumed they were masseuses, even though members pressed her on why an extremely wealthy man would use rotating names and phone numbers instead of a professional massage service.<br /><br />The questioning also focused heavily on Epstein’s network and whether Groff had knowledge of powerful men being provided access to girls or young women through Epstein or Maxwell. Groff repeatedly answered no when asked whether she had arranged massages for prominent figures, knew of sexual activity involving minors or young women, or knew of anyone who knowingly facilitated Epstein’s crimes. She acknowledged scheduling or connecting Epstein with high-profile contacts, including Prince Andrew, Ehud Barak, Larry Summers, George Mitchell, John Kerry, Wesley Clark, Bill Clinton-related circles, and Donald Trump phone calls, but denied arranging Trump travel during her employment and denied knowledge of Trump-related law enforcement communications. She also said she never suspected Epstein or Maxwell of working with any intelligence service. Overall, Groff’s testimony was defensive and narrow: she admitted to being part of the machinery that kept Epstein’s calendar and contacts moving, but insisted she never saw the criminal operation underneath it and never knowingly enabled it.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:  <br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>755</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  How Prince Andrew Passed The Buck When it Comes To His Settlement With Virginia (7/11/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-how-prince-andrew-passed-the-buck-when-it-comes-to-his-settlement-with-virginia-7-11-26--72917219</link><description><![CDATA[Queen Elizabeth’s role in Prince Andrew’s settlement with Virginia Giuffre was never formally laid out in court, because the financial terms were sealed, but reporting at the time said she helped Andrew get the deal done. The settlement, announced in February 2022, ended Giuffre’s civil sexual-abuse lawsuit against Andrew without any admission of liability, and it included a “substantial donation” to Giuffre’s charity. Multiple reports put the overall figure around £12 million, with some reporting that the Queen contributed money toward the settlement or the charity portion of it. That matters because it reinforced the perception that Andrew was not simply a disgraced man trying to resolve his own legal exposure; he was still being cushioned by the institution around him, and by a mother who had protected him for decades. Even after Andrew lost his military titles and royal patronages, the image left behind was unmistakable: the monarchy had cut him loose publicly, but the family was still helping clean up the wreckage privately.<br /><br />Then-Prince Charles’s role was more complicated and more political. He was widely reported to have been central to the internal royal push to remove Andrew from public life, strip him of official duties, and prevent the Epstein scandal from dragging the monarchy into the Queen’s Platinum Jubilee year. In that sense, Charles was not acting like Andrew’s rescuer in public; he was acting like the future king trying to contain a reputational catastrophe before it swallowed the institution. Later reporting has disputed or denied claims that Charles personally contributed to the settlement money, including a 2026 denial from a source close to King Charles that he helped fund the payout. But whether he paid into it or not, Charles’s institutional role was clear: Andrew had become radioactive, the case had to be settled before depositions and discovery did more damage, and the monarchy needed the scandal shut down before it reached deeper into the palace machinery. The settlement protected Andrew from trial, but it also protected the Crown from the spectacle of a prince being dragged through open court over Jeffrey Epstein.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72917219</guid><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 14:30:05 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72917219/megaandrewcharlesqueensettlement.mp3" length="44705406" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f4825ba5-8748-4ac9-adeb-6adb60e9365d/f4825ba5-8748-4ac9-adeb-6adb60e9365d.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f4825ba5-8748-4ac9-adeb-6adb60e9365d/f4825ba5-8748-4ac9-adeb-6adb60e9365d.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f4825ba5-8748-4ac9-adeb-6adb60e9365d/f4825ba5-8748-4ac9-adeb-6adb60e9365d.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Queen Elizabeth’s role in Prince Andrew’s settlement with Virginia Giuffre was never formally laid out in court, because the financial terms were sealed, but reporting at the time said she helped Andrew get the deal done. The settlement, announced in...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Queen Elizabeth’s role in Prince Andrew’s settlement with Virginia Giuffre was never formally laid out in court, because the financial terms were sealed, but reporting at the time said she helped Andrew get the deal done. The settlement, announced in February 2022, ended Giuffre’s civil sexual-abuse lawsuit against Andrew without any admission of liability, and it included a “substantial donation” to Giuffre’s charity. Multiple reports put the overall figure around £12 million, with some reporting that the Queen contributed money toward the settlement or the charity portion of it. That matters because it reinforced the perception that Andrew was not simply a disgraced man trying to resolve his own legal exposure; he was still being cushioned by the institution around him, and by a mother who had protected him for decades. Even after Andrew lost his military titles and royal patronages, the image left behind was unmistakable: the monarchy had cut him loose publicly, but the family was still helping clean up the wreckage privately.<br /><br />Then-Prince Charles’s role was more complicated and more political. He was widely reported to have been central to the internal royal push to remove Andrew from public life, strip him of official duties, and prevent the Epstein scandal from dragging the monarchy into the Queen’s Platinum Jubilee year. In that sense, Charles was not acting like Andrew’s rescuer in public; he was acting like the future king trying to contain a reputational catastrophe before it swallowed the institution. Later reporting has disputed or denied claims that Charles personally contributed to the settlement money, including a 2026 denial from a source close to King Charles that he helped fund the payout. But whether he paid into it or not, Charles’s institutional role was clear: Andrew had become radioactive, the case had to be settled before depositions and discovery did more damage, and the monarchy needed the scandal shut down before it reached deeper into the palace machinery. The settlement protected Andrew from trial, but it also protected the Crown from the spectacle of a prince being dragged through open court over Jeffrey Epstein.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2795</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Prince Andrew And The Royal Dressing Down At Balmoral By Mummy (7/11/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-prince-andrew-and-the-royal-dressing-down-at-balmoral-by-mummy-7-11-26--72917218</link><description><![CDATA[Prince Andrew’s bond with Queen Elizabeth II was always treated as one of the great protected relationships inside the House of Windsor. He was widely described as her favorite child, and even as the Epstein scandal shredded his public standing, the Queen repeatedly appeared reluctant to fully cast him out. Reporting has described her standing by him after his disastrous 2019 BBC Newsnight interview, allowing him to step back from duties rather than immediately stripping him of everything, and later permitting him to remain Duke of York and a prince while the scandal continued to metastasize. Even in 2022, after Andrew had settled Virginia Giuffre’s civil case without admitting liability, the Queen chose him to escort her into Prince Philip’s memorial service — a public gesture that was widely read as motherly protection at the exact moment the institution should have been running from him.<br /><br />That “special relationship” is what made the Balmoral episode so revealing. In September 2020, Queen Elizabeth reportedly summoned Andrew to Balmoral for crisis talks over Jeffrey Epstein, with Andrew leaving Windsor for the Scottish Highlands to brief his mother after another summer of damaging revelations. The reports said the Queen wanted to be kept informed, that “so much” had come out, and that Andrew’s Epstein ties — including Virginia Giuffre’s allegations, his catastrophic BBC explanations, and his alleged lack of cooperation with U.S. investigators — were still poisoning the monarchy. The image is damning: not a disgraced royal facing full institutional accountability, but a protected son being called in for a private family reckoning with “mummy” at Balmoral. And that has always been the central problem with Andrew — the scandal was never just about his relationship with Epstein; it was about how long royal privilege softened the consequences.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72917218</guid><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 12:30:05 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72917218/megaandrewsummonedtobalmoralchatmummy.mp3" length="42347668" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/17d5166c-46b7-4b05-ac2d-a477e8db875b/17d5166c-46b7-4b05-ac2d-a477e8db875b.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/17d5166c-46b7-4b05-ac2d-a477e8db875b/17d5166c-46b7-4b05-ac2d-a477e8db875b.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/17d5166c-46b7-4b05-ac2d-a477e8db875b/17d5166c-46b7-4b05-ac2d-a477e8db875b.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Prince Andrew’s bond with Queen Elizabeth II was always treated as one of the great protected relationships inside the House of Windsor. He was widely described as her favorite child, and even as the Epstein scandal shredded his public standing, the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Prince Andrew’s bond with Queen Elizabeth II was always treated as one of the great protected relationships inside the House of Windsor. He was widely described as her favorite child, and even as the Epstein scandal shredded his public standing, the Queen repeatedly appeared reluctant to fully cast him out. Reporting has described her standing by him after his disastrous 2019 BBC Newsnight interview, allowing him to step back from duties rather than immediately stripping him of everything, and later permitting him to remain Duke of York and a prince while the scandal continued to metastasize. Even in 2022, after Andrew had settled Virginia Giuffre’s civil case without admitting liability, the Queen chose him to escort her into Prince Philip’s memorial service — a public gesture that was widely read as motherly protection at the exact moment the institution should have been running from him.<br /><br />That “special relationship” is what made the Balmoral episode so revealing. In September 2020, Queen Elizabeth reportedly summoned Andrew to Balmoral for crisis talks over Jeffrey Epstein, with Andrew leaving Windsor for the Scottish Highlands to brief his mother after another summer of damaging revelations. The reports said the Queen wanted to be kept informed, that “so much” had come out, and that Andrew’s Epstein ties — including Virginia Giuffre’s allegations, his catastrophic BBC explanations, and his alleged lack of cooperation with U.S. investigators — were still poisoning the monarchy. The image is damning: not a disgraced royal facing full institutional accountability, but a protected son being called in for a private family reckoning with “mummy” at Balmoral. And that has always been the central problem with Andrew — the scandal was never just about his relationship with Epstein; it was about how long royal privilege softened the consequences.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2647</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Nadia Marcinkova And The Blurred Line (7/11/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-nadia-marcinkova-and-the-blurred-line-7-11-26--72892752</link><description><![CDATA[Nadia Marcinkova, also known as Nadia Marcinko or Nada Marcinkova, fits into the Epstein story as one of the women identified as being inside Jeffrey Epstein’s inner circle rather than merely passing through it. She has been described in reporting and court-related materials as a former model, later a pilot, and a longtime Epstein associate who appeared in flight records and was connected to his private-plane operation. Her name is especially significant because she was listed in Epstein’s 2007/2008 non-prosecution arrangement as one of the “potential co-conspirators” who received protection from federal prosecution, alongside names such as Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, and Lesley Groff. That immunity provision became one of the ugliest parts of the sweetheart deal, because it did not just spare Epstein from serious federal consequences at the time; it also created a protective shield around people alleged to have helped keep the machine running.<br /><br />The controversy around Marcinkova is that she sits in that murky, disturbing space between alleged victim and alleged facilitator. Some accounts have claimed Epstein brought her to the United States when she was young and referred to her in degrading terms, while alleged victims told investigators that she participated in sexual encounters involving Epstein and recruited girls; Marcinkova has not been criminally charged. That unresolved status is exactly why her name continues to draw attention: survivors and critics see her as someone who may know far more about Epstein’s operation than has ever been publicly explained, while others point to the possibility that she herself was groomed, controlled, or exploited before becoming part of the machinery around him. Her later reinvention as an aviation figure, her low public profile, and renewed attention after document releases have only deepened the sense that her role remains one of the many unanswered questions in the Epstein scandal.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72892752</guid><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 10:30:05 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72892752/meganadiaquestionssurroundrelationship.mp3" length="50958045" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ecbf3910-819f-43e7-a676-369dca039852/ecbf3910-819f-43e7-a676-369dca039852.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ecbf3910-819f-43e7-a676-369dca039852/ecbf3910-819f-43e7-a676-369dca039852.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ecbf3910-819f-43e7-a676-369dca039852/ecbf3910-819f-43e7-a676-369dca039852.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Nadia Marcinkova, also known as Nadia Marcinko or Nada Marcinkova, fits into the Epstein story as one of the women identified as being inside Jeffrey Epstein’s inner circle rather than merely passing through it. She has been described in reporting and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Nadia Marcinkova, also known as Nadia Marcinko or Nada Marcinkova, fits into the Epstein story as one of the women identified as being inside Jeffrey Epstein’s inner circle rather than merely passing through it. She has been described in reporting and court-related materials as a former model, later a pilot, and a longtime Epstein associate who appeared in flight records and was connected to his private-plane operation. Her name is especially significant because she was listed in Epstein’s 2007/2008 non-prosecution arrangement as one of the “potential co-conspirators” who received protection from federal prosecution, alongside names such as Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, and Lesley Groff. That immunity provision became one of the ugliest parts of the sweetheart deal, because it did not just spare Epstein from serious federal consequences at the time; it also created a protective shield around people alleged to have helped keep the machine running.<br /><br />The controversy around Marcinkova is that she sits in that murky, disturbing space between alleged victim and alleged facilitator. Some accounts have claimed Epstein brought her to the United States when she was young and referred to her in degrading terms, while alleged victims told investigators that she participated in sexual encounters involving Epstein and recruited girls; Marcinkova has not been criminally charged. That unresolved status is exactly why her name continues to draw attention: survivors and critics see her as someone who may know far more about Epstein’s operation than has ever been publicly explained, while others point to the possibility that she herself was groomed, controlled, or exploited before becoming part of the machinery around him. Her later reinvention as an aviation figure, her low public profile, and renewed attention after document releases have only deepened the sense that her role remains one of the many unanswered questions in the Epstein scandal.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3185</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Leon Black And The Direct Line To Jeffrey Epstein (7/11/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-leon-black-and-the-direct-line-to-jeffrey-epstein-7-11-26--72892751</link><description><![CDATA[Leon Black and Jeffrey Epstein were not just casual acquaintances or two wealthy men who occasionally crossed paths. The relationship was far closer, more sustained, and more financially entangled than Black first publicly suggested. Black paid Epstein enormous sums for tax, estate, and philanthropic advice, with Apollo’s own commissioned review saying Black paid Epstein roughly $158 million, while Senate investigators later said their review identified even more money flowing through the relationship. Black has insisted the work was legitimate and that Epstein was never involved in Apollo business, but the size of the payments, Epstein’s lack of conventional tax-law credentials, and the length of the relationship made the explanation difficult for critics to swallow. Black himself later called the relationship a “horrible mistake,” but the controversy only deepened as investigators kept uncovering more details about how central Epstein was to Black’s personal financial world<br /><br />Epstein appears to have had direct access into Black’s family office orbit, including links to Elysium Management and relationships with bankers and financial figures connected to Black’s wealth-management structure. Reporting and congressional scrutiny have also focused on whether Epstein acted as more than a tax adviser, with Senator Ron Wyden alleging that Epstein’s role included unexplained payments, possible payments to women, and even surveillance-related conduct tied to Black; Black has broadly denied wrongdoing and has not been criminally charged. But the larger point is clear: Epstein was not merely someone Black unfortunately hired once. He was embedded close enough to receive staggering sums, move in Black’s personal financial ecosystem, and become a recurring figure in the paper trail that investigators are still trying to untangle.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72892751</guid><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 08:30:06 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72892751/megaleonblackdirectlineepstein.mp3" length="49488083" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c4cc9fb2-92cd-4fdf-972a-ba9a40d5430d/c4cc9fb2-92cd-4fdf-972a-ba9a40d5430d.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c4cc9fb2-92cd-4fdf-972a-ba9a40d5430d/c4cc9fb2-92cd-4fdf-972a-ba9a40d5430d.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c4cc9fb2-92cd-4fdf-972a-ba9a40d5430d/c4cc9fb2-92cd-4fdf-972a-ba9a40d5430d.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Leon Black and Jeffrey Epstein were not just casual acquaintances or two wealthy men who occasionally crossed paths. The relationship was far closer, more sustained, and more financially entangled than Black first publicly suggested. Black paid...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Leon Black and Jeffrey Epstein were not just casual acquaintances or two wealthy men who occasionally crossed paths. The relationship was far closer, more sustained, and more financially entangled than Black first publicly suggested. Black paid Epstein enormous sums for tax, estate, and philanthropic advice, with Apollo’s own commissioned review saying Black paid Epstein roughly $158 million, while Senate investigators later said their review identified even more money flowing through the relationship. Black has insisted the work was legitimate and that Epstein was never involved in Apollo business, but the size of the payments, Epstein’s lack of conventional tax-law credentials, and the length of the relationship made the explanation difficult for critics to swallow. Black himself later called the relationship a “horrible mistake,” but the controversy only deepened as investigators kept uncovering more details about how central Epstein was to Black’s personal financial world<br /><br />Epstein appears to have had direct access into Black’s family office orbit, including links to Elysium Management and relationships with bankers and financial figures connected to Black’s wealth-management structure. Reporting and congressional scrutiny have also focused on whether Epstein acted as more than a tax adviser, with Senator Ron Wyden alleging that Epstein’s role included unexplained payments, possible payments to women, and even surveillance-related conduct tied to Black; Black has broadly denied wrongdoing and has not been criminally charged. But the larger point is clear: Epstein was not merely someone Black unfortunately hired once. He was embedded close enough to receive staggering sums, move in Black’s personal financial ecosystem, and become a recurring figure in the paper trail that investigators are still trying to untangle.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3093</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Sarah Kellen Vickers New Narrative Versus The Contemporaneous Record (7/11/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-sarah-kellen-vickers-new-narrative-versus-the-contemporaneous-record-7-11-26--72892750</link><description><![CDATA[Sarah Kellen’s new narrative is that she was not one of Jeffrey Epstein’s enablers, but one of his victims: groomed, abused, controlled, threatened, and psychologically trapped inside his world. In her 2026 House Oversight testimony and related reporting, she described Epstein as someone who sexually and psychologically abused her, manipulated her, and used his power to make her believe disobedience would cost her everything. That account matters, and it should not be dismissed automatically, because Epstein’s operation was built on coercion, dependency, manipulation, and blurred lines between victimization and participation. But the problem for Kellen is that her victimhood claim crashes directly into the record that has followed her for years: she was named as a potential co-conspirator in Epstein’s non-prosecution agreement, was repeatedly described in lawsuits and survivor accounts as a scheduler or facilitator, and has long been accused of helping arrange massages, travel, logistics, and access to girls and young women.<br /><br />Survivors have not merely described her as someone standing in the background; they have described her as part of the machinery that made Epstein’s abuse possible. The evidence trail has also pointed to her being inside the operational center of Epstein’s life, not outside of it: close to the calendars, close to the travel, close to the appointments, close to the day-to-day system that delivered girls into Epstein’s orbit. Kellen has never been criminally charged, and it is possible for someone to be both abused and later used to help an abuser harm others. But that does not erase the allegations against her, and it does not answer the central question survivors have been asking for years: if Kellen was close enough to know how the machine worked, why has there been so little public accountability for the people accused of keeping it running? Her new narrative may explain how Epstein controlled her, but it does not magically wipe away what survivors say she did, what the paper trail suggests she knew, or why her immunity remains one of the most bitter symbols of the Epstein deal.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72892750</guid><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72892750/megasarahkellenvstherecord.mp3" length="51888034" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/858a6ee6-a683-42ef-905b-1347648421c7/858a6ee6-a683-42ef-905b-1347648421c7.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/858a6ee6-a683-42ef-905b-1347648421c7/858a6ee6-a683-42ef-905b-1347648421c7.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/858a6ee6-a683-42ef-905b-1347648421c7/858a6ee6-a683-42ef-905b-1347648421c7.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Sarah Kellen’s new narrative is that she was not one of Jeffrey Epstein’s enablers, but one of his victims: groomed, abused, controlled, threatened, and psychologically trapped inside his world. In her 2026 House Oversight testimony and related...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Sarah Kellen’s new narrative is that she was not one of Jeffrey Epstein’s enablers, but one of his victims: groomed, abused, controlled, threatened, and psychologically trapped inside his world. In her 2026 House Oversight testimony and related reporting, she described Epstein as someone who sexually and psychologically abused her, manipulated her, and used his power to make her believe disobedience would cost her everything. That account matters, and it should not be dismissed automatically, because Epstein’s operation was built on coercion, dependency, manipulation, and blurred lines between victimization and participation. But the problem for Kellen is that her victimhood claim crashes directly into the record that has followed her for years: she was named as a potential co-conspirator in Epstein’s non-prosecution agreement, was repeatedly described in lawsuits and survivor accounts as a scheduler or facilitator, and has long been accused of helping arrange massages, travel, logistics, and access to girls and young women.<br /><br />Survivors have not merely described her as someone standing in the background; they have described her as part of the machinery that made Epstein’s abuse possible. The evidence trail has also pointed to her being inside the operational center of Epstein’s life, not outside of it: close to the calendars, close to the travel, close to the appointments, close to the day-to-day system that delivered girls into Epstein’s orbit. Kellen has never been criminally charged, and it is possible for someone to be both abused and later used to help an abuser harm others. But that does not erase the allegations against her, and it does not answer the central question survivors have been asking for years: if Kellen was close enough to know how the machine worked, why has there been so little public accountability for the people accused of keeping it running? Her new narrative may explain how Epstein controlled her, but it does not magically wipe away what survivors say she did, what the paper trail suggests she knew, or why her immunity remains one of the most bitter symbols of the Epstein deal.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3243</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Inside The OIG Interview:  The Testimony Of The Electrical Engineer From MCC (Part 7)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/inside-the-oig-interview-the-testimony-of-the-electrical-engineer-from-mcc-part-7--72892643</link><description><![CDATA[The document is a sworn statement from an electrical engineer assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York, given in the aftermath of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. In his testimony, the engineer outlines the condition and functionality of the facility’s electrical and surveillance infrastructure, specifically addressing whether any power failures or technical malfunctions could have impacted the operation of cameras or monitoring systems on the night Epstein died. He indicates that, based on his review and knowledge of the systems, there were no significant electrical outages or systemic failures that would have disabled the cameras covering Epstein’s housing unit during the relevant timeframe. His statement is meant to clarify that the infrastructure itself was not compromised by a power-related issue.<br /><br />The engineer further explains how the MCC’s surveillance systems were designed to operate, including backup power measures and redundancies intended to keep critical systems running even in the event of localized disruptions. His account suggests that if cameras were not recording or footage was unavailable, the cause would likely not be attributable to an electrical failure but rather to other factors, such as equipment issues, configuration problems, or human involvement. In the broader context, this sworn statement undercuts the notion that a simple technical malfunction explains the lack of usable surveillance footage, instead reinforcing the unresolved questions surrounding how monitoring systems failed at such a critical moment.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00064043.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00064043.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72892643</guid><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72892643/mccoigengineer7.mp3" length="12635786" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0423a965-576d-44d1-b3dd-03f9f6d326f3/0423a965-576d-44d1-b3dd-03f9f6d326f3.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0423a965-576d-44d1-b3dd-03f9f6d326f3/0423a965-576d-44d1-b3dd-03f9f6d326f3.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0423a965-576d-44d1-b3dd-03f9f6d326f3/0423a965-576d-44d1-b3dd-03f9f6d326f3.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The document is a sworn statement from an electrical engineer assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York, given in the aftermath of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. In his testimony, the engineer outlines the condition and functionality of...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The document is a sworn statement from an electrical engineer assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York, given in the aftermath of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. In his testimony, the engineer outlines the condition and functionality of the facility’s electrical and surveillance infrastructure, specifically addressing whether any power failures or technical malfunctions could have impacted the operation of cameras or monitoring systems on the night Epstein died. He indicates that, based on his review and knowledge of the systems, there were no significant electrical outages or systemic failures that would have disabled the cameras covering Epstein’s housing unit during the relevant timeframe. His statement is meant to clarify that the infrastructure itself was not compromised by a power-related issue.<br /><br />The engineer further explains how the MCC’s surveillance systems were designed to operate, including backup power measures and redundancies intended to keep critical systems running even in the event of localized disruptions. His account suggests that if cameras were not recording or footage was unavailable, the cause would likely not be attributable to an electrical failure but rather to other factors, such as equipment issues, configuration problems, or human involvement. In the broader context, this sworn statement undercuts the notion that a simple technical malfunction explains the lack of usable surveillance footage, instead reinforcing the unresolved questions surrounding how monitoring systems failed at such a critical moment.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00064043.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00064043.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>790</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Inside The OIG Interview:  The Testimony Of The Electrical Engineer From MCC (Part 6)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/inside-the-oig-interview-the-testimony-of-the-electrical-engineer-from-mcc-part-6--72892647</link><description><![CDATA[The document is a sworn statement from an electrical engineer assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York, given in the aftermath of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. In his testimony, the engineer outlines the condition and functionality of the facility’s electrical and surveillance infrastructure, specifically addressing whether any power failures or technical malfunctions could have impacted the operation of cameras or monitoring systems on the night Epstein died. He indicates that, based on his review and knowledge of the systems, there were no significant electrical outages or systemic failures that would have disabled the cameras covering Epstein’s housing unit during the relevant timeframe. His statement is meant to clarify that the infrastructure itself was not compromised by a power-related issue.<br /><br />The engineer further explains how the MCC’s surveillance systems were designed to operate, including backup power measures and redundancies intended to keep critical systems running even in the event of localized disruptions. His account suggests that if cameras were not recording or footage was unavailable, the cause would likely not be attributable to an electrical failure but rather to other factors, such as equipment issues, configuration problems, or human involvement. In the broader context, this sworn statement undercuts the notion that a simple technical malfunction explains the lack of usable surveillance footage, instead reinforcing the unresolved questions surrounding how monitoring systems failed at such a critical moment.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00064043.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00064043.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72892647</guid><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72892647/mccoigengineer6.mp3" length="11681167" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/bfc94040-4be2-4ba4-b676-cfe83bfb521e/bfc94040-4be2-4ba4-b676-cfe83bfb521e.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/bfc94040-4be2-4ba4-b676-cfe83bfb521e/bfc94040-4be2-4ba4-b676-cfe83bfb521e.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/bfc94040-4be2-4ba4-b676-cfe83bfb521e/bfc94040-4be2-4ba4-b676-cfe83bfb521e.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The document is a sworn statement from an electrical engineer assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York, given in the aftermath of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. In his testimony, the engineer outlines the condition and functionality of...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The document is a sworn statement from an electrical engineer assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York, given in the aftermath of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. In his testimony, the engineer outlines the condition and functionality of the facility’s electrical and surveillance infrastructure, specifically addressing whether any power failures or technical malfunctions could have impacted the operation of cameras or monitoring systems on the night Epstein died. He indicates that, based on his review and knowledge of the systems, there were no significant electrical outages or systemic failures that would have disabled the cameras covering Epstein’s housing unit during the relevant timeframe. His statement is meant to clarify that the infrastructure itself was not compromised by a power-related issue.<br /><br />The engineer further explains how the MCC’s surveillance systems were designed to operate, including backup power measures and redundancies intended to keep critical systems running even in the event of localized disruptions. His account suggests that if cameras were not recording or footage was unavailable, the cause would likely not be attributable to an electrical failure but rather to other factors, such as equipment issues, configuration problems, or human involvement. In the broader context, this sworn statement undercuts the notion that a simple technical malfunction explains the lack of usable surveillance footage, instead reinforcing the unresolved questions surrounding how monitoring systems failed at such a critical moment.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00064043.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00064043.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>731</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Inside The OIG Interview:  The Testimony Of The Electrical Engineer From MCC (Part 5)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/inside-the-oig-interview-the-testimony-of-the-electrical-engineer-from-mcc-part-5--72892644</link><description><![CDATA[The document is a sworn statement from an electrical engineer assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York, given in the aftermath of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. In his testimony, the engineer outlines the condition and functionality of the facility’s electrical and surveillance infrastructure, specifically addressing whether any power failures or technical malfunctions could have impacted the operation of cameras or monitoring systems on the night Epstein died. He indicates that, based on his review and knowledge of the systems, there were no significant electrical outages or systemic failures that would have disabled the cameras covering Epstein’s housing unit during the relevant timeframe. His statement is meant to clarify that the infrastructure itself was not compromised by a power-related issue.<br /><br />The engineer further explains how the MCC’s surveillance systems were designed to operate, including backup power measures and redundancies intended to keep critical systems running even in the event of localized disruptions. His account suggests that if cameras were not recording or footage was unavailable, the cause would likely not be attributable to an electrical failure but rather to other factors, such as equipment issues, configuration problems, or human involvement. In the broader context, this sworn statement undercuts the notion that a simple technical malfunction explains the lack of usable surveillance footage, instead reinforcing the unresolved questions surrounding how monitoring systems failed at such a critical moment.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00064043.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00064043.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72892644</guid><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 00:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72892644/mccoigengineer5.mp3" length="10799691" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/889b45d6-65ea-45ba-95ea-ae3df1b9299d/889b45d6-65ea-45ba-95ea-ae3df1b9299d.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/889b45d6-65ea-45ba-95ea-ae3df1b9299d/889b45d6-65ea-45ba-95ea-ae3df1b9299d.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/889b45d6-65ea-45ba-95ea-ae3df1b9299d/889b45d6-65ea-45ba-95ea-ae3df1b9299d.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The document is a sworn statement from an electrical engineer assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York, given in the aftermath of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. In his testimony, the engineer outlines the condition and functionality of...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The document is a sworn statement from an electrical engineer assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York, given in the aftermath of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. In his testimony, the engineer outlines the condition and functionality of the facility’s electrical and surveillance infrastructure, specifically addressing whether any power failures or technical malfunctions could have impacted the operation of cameras or monitoring systems on the night Epstein died. He indicates that, based on his review and knowledge of the systems, there were no significant electrical outages or systemic failures that would have disabled the cameras covering Epstein’s housing unit during the relevant timeframe. His statement is meant to clarify that the infrastructure itself was not compromised by a power-related issue.<br /><br />The engineer further explains how the MCC’s surveillance systems were designed to operate, including backup power measures and redundancies intended to keep critical systems running even in the event of localized disruptions. His account suggests that if cameras were not recording or footage was unavailable, the cause would likely not be attributable to an electrical failure but rather to other factors, such as equipment issues, configuration problems, or human involvement. In the broader context, this sworn statement undercuts the notion that a simple technical malfunction explains the lack of usable surveillance footage, instead reinforcing the unresolved questions surrounding how monitoring systems failed at such a critical moment.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00064043.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00064043.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>675</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The State vs. Tyler Robinson: Inside the Charlie Kirk Murder Trial (Part 5) (7/10/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-state-vs-tyler-robinson-inside-the-charlie-kirk-murder-trial-part-5-7-10-26--72917182</link><description><![CDATA[Charlie Kirk was killed in what amounts to a political assassination, and the gravity of that cannot be softened, blurred, or buried under the usual noise. This was not just another violent crime, not just another court case, and not just another headline for people to weaponize for a news cycle. It was the killing of a public political figure in front of the country, followed almost immediately by the rush to explain it, exploit it, minimize it, or turn it into proof of whatever people already believed. Tyler Robinson now stands accused of carrying out that attack, and prosecutors say their case is built around a trail of evidence that includes his movements, the weapon, physical evidence, digital communications, and the timeline that led from the shooting to his arrest. But the fact that someone has been charged does not mean the public gets to skip the hard part. The evidence still has to be examined, the state’s claims still have to be tested, the defense still has the right to challenge the case, and the courts still have to decide what can actually be proven.<br /><br />The larger point is that a case this explosive demands more than outrage, slogans, and prepackaged conclusions. Charlie Kirk’s death instantly became a national pressure point because it touched politics, public violence, institutional trust, media coverage, online speculation, and the way Americans now process tragedy through tribal loyalty instead of disciplined fact-finding. Every official statement matters, every gap in the timeline matters, every piece of evidence matters, and every claim made by prosecutors, investigators, pundits, politicians, and anonymous internet sleuths has to be separated from what is actually in the record. The case is about the killing itself, the man accused, the evidence prosecutors say ties him to the crime, the questions the defense may raise, and the broader consequences of a political assassination unfolding in a country already primed to distrust everything. No one should be allowed to declare the truth simply because their preferred narrative feels right. The only way to handle a case like this is to walk through the record, piece by piece, and force every claim to survive contact with the evidence.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72917182</guid><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72917182/9ac88778_a59f_4add_8ad1_ceba2f5dd417.mp3" length="17959332" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/786280b1-4ac2-42e4-8118-70faba64c18a/786280b1-4ac2-42e4-8118-70faba64c18a.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/786280b1-4ac2-42e4-8118-70faba64c18a/786280b1-4ac2-42e4-8118-70faba64c18a.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/786280b1-4ac2-42e4-8118-70faba64c18a/786280b1-4ac2-42e4-8118-70faba64c18a.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Charlie Kirk was killed in what amounts to a political assassination, and the gravity of that cannot be softened, blurred, or buried under the usual noise. This was not just another violent crime, not just another court case, and not just another...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Charlie Kirk was killed in what amounts to a political assassination, and the gravity of that cannot be softened, blurred, or buried under the usual noise. This was not just another violent crime, not just another court case, and not just another headline for people to weaponize for a news cycle. It was the killing of a public political figure in front of the country, followed almost immediately by the rush to explain it, exploit it, minimize it, or turn it into proof of whatever people already believed. Tyler Robinson now stands accused of carrying out that attack, and prosecutors say their case is built around a trail of evidence that includes his movements, the weapon, physical evidence, digital communications, and the timeline that led from the shooting to his arrest. But the fact that someone has been charged does not mean the public gets to skip the hard part. The evidence still has to be examined, the state’s claims still have to be tested, the defense still has the right to challenge the case, and the courts still have to decide what can actually be proven.<br /><br />The larger point is that a case this explosive demands more than outrage, slogans, and prepackaged conclusions. Charlie Kirk’s death instantly became a national pressure point because it touched politics, public violence, institutional trust, media coverage, online speculation, and the way Americans now process tragedy through tribal loyalty instead of disciplined fact-finding. Every official statement matters, every gap in the timeline matters, every piece of evidence matters, and every claim made by prosecutors, investigators, pundits, politicians, and anonymous internet sleuths has to be separated from what is actually in the record. The case is about the killing itself, the man accused, the evidence prosecutors say ties him to the crime, the questions the defense may raise, and the broader consequences of a political assassination unfolding in a country already primed to distrust everything. No one should be allowed to declare the truth simply because their preferred narrative feels right. The only way to handle a case like this is to walk through the record, piece by piece, and force every claim to survive contact with the evidence.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1123</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvu</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The State vs. Tyler Robinson: Inside the Charlie Kirk Murder Trial (Part 4) (7/10/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-state-vs-tyler-robinson-inside-the-charlie-kirk-murder-trial-part-4-7-10-26--72917180</link><description><![CDATA[Charlie Kirk was killed in what amounts to a political assassination, and the gravity of that cannot be softened, blurred, or buried under the usual noise. This was not just another violent crime, not just another court case, and not just another headline for people to weaponize for a news cycle. It was the killing of a public political figure in front of the country, followed almost immediately by the rush to explain it, exploit it, minimize it, or turn it into proof of whatever people already believed. Tyler Robinson now stands accused of carrying out that attack, and prosecutors say their case is built around a trail of evidence that includes his movements, the weapon, physical evidence, digital communications, and the timeline that led from the shooting to his arrest. But the fact that someone has been charged does not mean the public gets to skip the hard part. The evidence still has to be examined, the state’s claims still have to be tested, the defense still has the right to challenge the case, and the courts still have to decide what can actually be proven.<br /><br />The larger point is that a case this explosive demands more than outrage, slogans, and prepackaged conclusions. Charlie Kirk’s death instantly became a national pressure point because it touched politics, public violence, institutional trust, media coverage, online speculation, and the way Americans now process tragedy through tribal loyalty instead of disciplined fact-finding. Every official statement matters, every gap in the timeline matters, every piece of evidence matters, and every claim made by prosecutors, investigators, pundits, politicians, and anonymous internet sleuths has to be separated from what is actually in the record. The case is about the killing itself, the man accused, the evidence prosecutors say ties him to the crime, the questions the defense may raise, and the broader consequences of a political assassination unfolding in a country already primed to distrust everything. No one should be allowed to declare the truth simply because their preferred narrative feels right. The only way to handle a case like this is to walk through the record, piece by piece, and force every claim to survive contact with the evidence.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72917180</guid><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72917180/3675d25f_c089_4300_86bc_61bc76b29d83.mp3" length="12128801" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6a8af59a-a928-439d-b51d-b2e05a121535/6a8af59a-a928-439d-b51d-b2e05a121535.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6a8af59a-a928-439d-b51d-b2e05a121535/6a8af59a-a928-439d-b51d-b2e05a121535.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6a8af59a-a928-439d-b51d-b2e05a121535/6a8af59a-a928-439d-b51d-b2e05a121535.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Charlie Kirk was killed in what amounts to a political assassination, and the gravity of that cannot be softened, blurred, or buried under the usual noise. This was not just another violent crime, not just another court case, and not just another...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Charlie Kirk was killed in what amounts to a political assassination, and the gravity of that cannot be softened, blurred, or buried under the usual noise. This was not just another violent crime, not just another court case, and not just another headline for people to weaponize for a news cycle. It was the killing of a public political figure in front of the country, followed almost immediately by the rush to explain it, exploit it, minimize it, or turn it into proof of whatever people already believed. Tyler Robinson now stands accused of carrying out that attack, and prosecutors say their case is built around a trail of evidence that includes his movements, the weapon, physical evidence, digital communications, and the timeline that led from the shooting to his arrest. But the fact that someone has been charged does not mean the public gets to skip the hard part. The evidence still has to be examined, the state’s claims still have to be tested, the defense still has the right to challenge the case, and the courts still have to decide what can actually be proven.<br /><br />The larger point is that a case this explosive demands more than outrage, slogans, and prepackaged conclusions. Charlie Kirk’s death instantly became a national pressure point because it touched politics, public violence, institutional trust, media coverage, online speculation, and the way Americans now process tragedy through tribal loyalty instead of disciplined fact-finding. Every official statement matters, every gap in the timeline matters, every piece of evidence matters, and every claim made by prosecutors, investigators, pundits, politicians, and anonymous internet sleuths has to be separated from what is actually in the record. The case is about the killing itself, the man accused, the evidence prosecutors say ties him to the crime, the questions the defense may raise, and the broader consequences of a political assassination unfolding in a country already primed to distrust everything. No one should be allowed to declare the truth simply because their preferred narrative feels right. The only way to handle a case like this is to walk through the record, piece by piece, and force every claim to survive contact with the evidence.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>759</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvu</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The State vs. Tyler Robinson: Inside the Charlie Kirk Murder Trial (Part 3) (7/10/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-state-vs-tyler-robinson-inside-the-charlie-kirk-murder-trial-part-3-7-10-26--72917181</link><description><![CDATA[Charlie Kirk was killed in what amounts to a political assassination, and the gravity of that cannot be softened, blurred, or buried under the usual noise. This was not just another violent crime, not just another court case, and not just another headline for people to weaponize for a news cycle. It was the killing of a public political figure in front of the country, followed almost immediately by the rush to explain it, exploit it, minimize it, or turn it into proof of whatever people already believed. Tyler Robinson now stands accused of carrying out that attack, and prosecutors say their case is built around a trail of evidence that includes his movements, the weapon, physical evidence, digital communications, and the timeline that led from the shooting to his arrest. But the fact that someone has been charged does not mean the public gets to skip the hard part. The evidence still has to be examined, the state’s claims still have to be tested, the defense still has the right to challenge the case, and the courts still have to decide what can actually be proven.<br /><br />The larger point is that a case this explosive demands more than outrage, slogans, and prepackaged conclusions. Charlie Kirk’s death instantly became a national pressure point because it touched politics, public violence, institutional trust, media coverage, online speculation, and the way Americans now process tragedy through tribal loyalty instead of disciplined fact-finding. Every official statement matters, every gap in the timeline matters, every piece of evidence matters, and every claim made by prosecutors, investigators, pundits, politicians, and anonymous internet sleuths has to be separated from what is actually in the record. The case is about the killing itself, the man accused, the evidence prosecutors say ties him to the crime, the questions the defense may raise, and the broader consequences of a political assassination unfolding in a country already primed to distrust everything. No one should be allowed to declare the truth simply because their preferred narrative feels right. The only way to handle a case like this is to walk through the record, piece by piece, and force every claim to survive contact with the evidence.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72917181</guid><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 18:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72917181/689f053f_3017_4c31_ba21_1f1db803782e.mp3" length="11947407" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1b96ea0b-3697-41a0-8cdb-8eb276d63d1a/1b96ea0b-3697-41a0-8cdb-8eb276d63d1a.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1b96ea0b-3697-41a0-8cdb-8eb276d63d1a/1b96ea0b-3697-41a0-8cdb-8eb276d63d1a.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1b96ea0b-3697-41a0-8cdb-8eb276d63d1a/1b96ea0b-3697-41a0-8cdb-8eb276d63d1a.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Charlie Kirk was killed in what amounts to a political assassination, and the gravity of that cannot be softened, blurred, or buried under the usual noise. This was not just another violent crime, not just another court case, and not just another...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Charlie Kirk was killed in what amounts to a political assassination, and the gravity of that cannot be softened, blurred, or buried under the usual noise. This was not just another violent crime, not just another court case, and not just another headline for people to weaponize for a news cycle. It was the killing of a public political figure in front of the country, followed almost immediately by the rush to explain it, exploit it, minimize it, or turn it into proof of whatever people already believed. Tyler Robinson now stands accused of carrying out that attack, and prosecutors say their case is built around a trail of evidence that includes his movements, the weapon, physical evidence, digital communications, and the timeline that led from the shooting to his arrest. But the fact that someone has been charged does not mean the public gets to skip the hard part. The evidence still has to be examined, the state’s claims still have to be tested, the defense still has the right to challenge the case, and the courts still have to decide what can actually be proven.<br /><br />The larger point is that a case this explosive demands more than outrage, slogans, and prepackaged conclusions. Charlie Kirk’s death instantly became a national pressure point because it touched politics, public violence, institutional trust, media coverage, online speculation, and the way Americans now process tragedy through tribal loyalty instead of disciplined fact-finding. Every official statement matters, every gap in the timeline matters, every piece of evidence matters, and every claim made by prosecutors, investigators, pundits, politicians, and anonymous internet sleuths has to be separated from what is actually in the record. The case is about the killing itself, the man accused, the evidence prosecutors say ties him to the crime, the questions the defense may raise, and the broader consequences of a political assassination unfolding in a country already primed to distrust everything. No one should be allowed to declare the truth simply because their preferred narrative feels right. The only way to handle a case like this is to walk through the record, piece by piece, and force every claim to survive contact with the evidence.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>747</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvu</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>No End In Sight For Congress’ Epstein Probe (7/10/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/no-end-in-sight-for-congress-epstein-probe-7-10-26--72913118</link><description><![CDATA[The House Oversight Committee’s Epstein investigation is about to hit the one-year mark, and according to Politico, there is no real sign that the probe is winding down. The central point is that, even without a single clean “smoking gun,” the investigation has developed too much political gravity to simply disappear. The committee remains under pressure to keep digging into Epstein’s network, his financial and social enablers, and the powerful figures who may have had knowledge of, benefited from, or helped shield his operation. Politico frames the probe as something that will likely outlast the current Congress, because both parties now have reasons to keep the issue alive: Democrats want to press Trump and his orbit, while Republicans face pressure from their own base to keep demanding answers about the Epstein files and institutional coverups.<br /><br />The bigger takeaway is that Epstein has become a permanent political liability, not just an old criminal case. The Oversight investigation has already pulled in documents, testimony, estate records, DOJ fights, and public pressure from survivors, and Politico suggests that the next phase could depend heavily on who controls the House after the midterms. If Democrats take control, the probe could become even more Trump-centered; if Republicans retain control, they may still be forced to continue because the Epstein issue has become radioactive with voters who believe Washington has hidden the truth for years. Either way, the article makes clear that Epstein is not fading into the background. The machinery of Congress may be slow, performative, and often self-serving, but the political appetite around this scandal is still there — and that means the investigation is likely to keep dragging powerful names, uncomfortable records, and institutional failures back into the light.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2026/07/09/jeffrey-epstein-trump-house-investigation-00990996" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Why the House's Epstein investigation isn't going away - POLITICO</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72913118</guid><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72913118/4368e9f4_368e_46c7_bbe1_1a8191e61967.mp3" length="20330414" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/02f21b75-b7c1-4acc-96cd-976d47d550be/02f21b75-b7c1-4acc-96cd-976d47d550be.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/02f21b75-b7c1-4acc-96cd-976d47d550be/02f21b75-b7c1-4acc-96cd-976d47d550be.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/02f21b75-b7c1-4acc-96cd-976d47d550be/02f21b75-b7c1-4acc-96cd-976d47d550be.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The House Oversight Committee’s Epstein investigation is about to hit the one-year mark, and according to Politico, there is no real sign that the probe is winding down. The central point is that, even without a single clean “smoking gun,” the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The House Oversight Committee’s Epstein investigation is about to hit the one-year mark, and according to Politico, there is no real sign that the probe is winding down. The central point is that, even without a single clean “smoking gun,” the investigation has developed too much political gravity to simply disappear. The committee remains under pressure to keep digging into Epstein’s network, his financial and social enablers, and the powerful figures who may have had knowledge of, benefited from, or helped shield his operation. Politico frames the probe as something that will likely outlast the current Congress, because both parties now have reasons to keep the issue alive: Democrats want to press Trump and his orbit, while Republicans face pressure from their own base to keep demanding answers about the Epstein files and institutional coverups.<br /><br />The bigger takeaway is that Epstein has become a permanent political liability, not just an old criminal case. The Oversight investigation has already pulled in documents, testimony, estate records, DOJ fights, and public pressure from survivors, and Politico suggests that the next phase could depend heavily on who controls the House after the midterms. If Democrats take control, the probe could become even more Trump-centered; if Republicans retain control, they may still be forced to continue because the Epstein issue has become radioactive with voters who believe Washington has hidden the truth for years. Either way, the article makes clear that Epstein is not fading into the background. The machinery of Congress may be slow, performative, and often self-serving, but the political appetite around this scandal is still there — and that means the investigation is likely to keep dragging powerful names, uncomfortable records, and institutional failures back into the light.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2026/07/09/jeffrey-epstein-trump-house-investigation-00990996" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Why the House's Epstein investigation isn't going away - POLITICO</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1271</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Why the Epstein Scandal Should Haunt Todd Blanche’s AG Nomination (Part 2) (7/20/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/why-the-epstein-scandal-should-haunt-todd-blanche-s-ag-nomination-part-2-7-20-26--72913120</link><description><![CDATA[The Epstein scandal should be disqualifying for Todd Blanche because it cuts straight to the central question of whether he can be trusted to lead the Department of Justice with independence, transparency, and moral authority. Blanche has been tied to the DOJ’s handling of the Epstein files at a time when the department has faced serious criticism over delayed releases, heavy redactions, disputed compliance with court orders, and the continued withholding of records the public has been demanding for years. That matters because the Epstein case is not just another legal controversy; it is a symbol of institutional failure, elite protection, and survivor betrayal. Any attorney general nominee connected to that same culture of secrecy should have to answer for it before being handed more power. Instead of looking like a reformer willing to rip open the files and restore public trust, Blanche looks like another custodian of the locked door. That alone should stop his nomination cold.<br /><br />The attorney general is supposed to be the person who proves that the law applies upward as well as downward, especially in a case as radioactive and morally loaded as Epstein’s. Blanche’s role in the file-release debacle, combined with reports that the DOJ has continued fighting disclosure in litigation, creates the appearance of a man protecting the institution instead of serving the public. In the Epstein matter, that appearance is devastating because secrecy has always been the scandal’s bloodstream. Survivors do not need another official praising transparency while documents remain buried, and the public does not need another polished lawyer explaining why accountability has to wait. Blanche should not be promoted into the job that controls the very machinery now under suspicion. He should be questioned, investigated, and forced to explain every delay, every withholding decision, and every redaction connected to the Epstein files. Until that happens, putting him in charge of the DOJ would not restore confidence; it would confirm that the culture of concealment is not being punished, but rewarded.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72913120</guid><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72913120/875054f5_1467_4692_a37a_6f5ff043f9f7.mp3" length="11264044" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/79a41d3d-3010-4b62-922f-521d3a3831ba/79a41d3d-3010-4b62-922f-521d3a3831ba.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/79a41d3d-3010-4b62-922f-521d3a3831ba/79a41d3d-3010-4b62-922f-521d3a3831ba.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/79a41d3d-3010-4b62-922f-521d3a3831ba/79a41d3d-3010-4b62-922f-521d3a3831ba.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Epstein scandal should be disqualifying for Todd Blanche because it cuts straight to the central question of whether he can be trusted to lead the Department of Justice with independence, transparency, and moral authority. Blanche has been tied to...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Epstein scandal should be disqualifying for Todd Blanche because it cuts straight to the central question of whether he can be trusted to lead the Department of Justice with independence, transparency, and moral authority. Blanche has been tied to the DOJ’s handling of the Epstein files at a time when the department has faced serious criticism over delayed releases, heavy redactions, disputed compliance with court orders, and the continued withholding of records the public has been demanding for years. That matters because the Epstein case is not just another legal controversy; it is a symbol of institutional failure, elite protection, and survivor betrayal. Any attorney general nominee connected to that same culture of secrecy should have to answer for it before being handed more power. Instead of looking like a reformer willing to rip open the files and restore public trust, Blanche looks like another custodian of the locked door. That alone should stop his nomination cold.<br /><br />The attorney general is supposed to be the person who proves that the law applies upward as well as downward, especially in a case as radioactive and morally loaded as Epstein’s. Blanche’s role in the file-release debacle, combined with reports that the DOJ has continued fighting disclosure in litigation, creates the appearance of a man protecting the institution instead of serving the public. In the Epstein matter, that appearance is devastating because secrecy has always been the scandal’s bloodstream. Survivors do not need another official praising transparency while documents remain buried, and the public does not need another polished lawyer explaining why accountability has to wait. Blanche should not be promoted into the job that controls the very machinery now under suspicion. He should be questioned, investigated, and forced to explain every delay, every withholding decision, and every redaction connected to the Epstein files. Until that happens, putting him in charge of the DOJ would not restore confidence; it would confirm that the culture of concealment is not being punished, but rewarded.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>704</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Why the Epstein Scandal Should Haunt Todd Blanche’s AG Nomination (Part 1) (7/10/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/why-the-epstein-scandal-should-haunt-todd-blanche-s-ag-nomination-part-1-7-10-26--72913119</link><description><![CDATA[The Epstein scandal should be disqualifying for Todd Blanche because it cuts straight to the central question of whether he can be trusted to lead the Department of Justice with independence, transparency, and moral authority. Blanche has been tied to the DOJ’s handling of the Epstein files at a time when the department has faced serious criticism over delayed releases, heavy redactions, disputed compliance with court orders, and the continued withholding of records the public has been demanding for years. That matters because the Epstein case is not just another legal controversy; it is a symbol of institutional failure, elite protection, and survivor betrayal. Any attorney general nominee connected to that same culture of secrecy should have to answer for it before being handed more power. Instead of looking like a reformer willing to rip open the files and restore public trust, Blanche looks like another custodian of the locked door. That alone should stop his nomination cold.<br /><br />The attorney general is supposed to be the person who proves that the law applies upward as well as downward, especially in a case as radioactive and morally loaded as Epstein’s. Blanche’s role in the file-release debacle, combined with reports that the DOJ has continued fighting disclosure in litigation, creates the appearance of a man protecting the institution instead of serving the public. In the Epstein matter, that appearance is devastating because secrecy has always been the scandal’s bloodstream. Survivors do not need another official praising transparency while documents remain buried, and the public does not need another polished lawyer explaining why accountability has to wait. Blanche should not be promoted into the job that controls the very machinery now under suspicion. He should be questioned, investigated, and forced to explain every delay, every withholding decision, and every redaction connected to the Epstein files. Until that happens, putting him in charge of the DOJ would not restore confidence; it would confirm that the culture of concealment is not being punished, but rewarded.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72913119</guid><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72913119/af1ee950_aba7_4bf1_9b15_0ded067a9d93.mp3" length="14198953" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c64c7480-1618-492c-a4e1-9177e7bf4927/c64c7480-1618-492c-a4e1-9177e7bf4927.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c64c7480-1618-492c-a4e1-9177e7bf4927/c64c7480-1618-492c-a4e1-9177e7bf4927.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c64c7480-1618-492c-a4e1-9177e7bf4927/c64c7480-1618-492c-a4e1-9177e7bf4927.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Epstein scandal should be disqualifying for Todd Blanche because it cuts straight to the central question of whether he can be trusted to lead the Department of Justice with independence, transparency, and moral authority. Blanche has been tied to...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Epstein scandal should be disqualifying for Todd Blanche because it cuts straight to the central question of whether he can be trusted to lead the Department of Justice with independence, transparency, and moral authority. Blanche has been tied to the DOJ’s handling of the Epstein files at a time when the department has faced serious criticism over delayed releases, heavy redactions, disputed compliance with court orders, and the continued withholding of records the public has been demanding for years. That matters because the Epstein case is not just another legal controversy; it is a symbol of institutional failure, elite protection, and survivor betrayal. Any attorney general nominee connected to that same culture of secrecy should have to answer for it before being handed more power. Instead of looking like a reformer willing to rip open the files and restore public trust, Blanche looks like another custodian of the locked door. That alone should stop his nomination cold.<br /><br />The attorney general is supposed to be the person who proves that the law applies upward as well as downward, especially in a case as radioactive and morally loaded as Epstein’s. Blanche’s role in the file-release debacle, combined with reports that the DOJ has continued fighting disclosure in litigation, creates the appearance of a man protecting the institution instead of serving the public. In the Epstein matter, that appearance is devastating because secrecy has always been the scandal’s bloodstream. Survivors do not need another official praising transparency while documents remain buried, and the public does not need another polished lawyer explaining why accountability has to wait. Blanche should not be promoted into the job that controls the very machinery now under suspicion. He should be questioned, investigated, and forced to explain every delay, every withholding decision, and every redaction connected to the Epstein files. Until that happens, putting him in charge of the DOJ would not restore confidence; it would confirm that the culture of concealment is not being punished, but rewarded.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>888</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>alexmurdaugh,breakingnews,breakingnewsreports,breakingnewsupdate,dailynews,dailynewsupdates,murdaugh,murdaughmurders,murdaughtrial,news,newsbreaks,newsbriefs,newscommentary,newsreport,newsupdate,newsupdates,southcarolina,truecrime,yourdailyupdate,yournewsyourworld</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Epstein Survivors Allege That Officials In The USVI Conspired With Epstein (7/10/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-epstein-survivors-allege-that-officials-in-the-usvi-conspired-with-epstein-7-10-26--72872912</link><description><![CDATA[Epstein survivors and their attorneys have alleged that Jeffrey Epstein did not operate in the U.S. Virgin Islands as a lone predator hiding from the system, but as a wealthy, connected trafficker whose presence was tolerated, facilitated, and protected by people with power. In litigation and public filings, survivors have described Little St. James and Great St. James as isolated sites where young women and girls were abused, trafficked, controlled, and cut off from ordinary avenues of escape or help. The core allegation is that USVI officials, agencies, and politically connected figures either looked the other way, accepted Epstein’s money and influence, or helped create the conditions that allowed him to keep operating for years. The USVI’s own 2020 enforcement action against Epstein’s estate accused his network of using the islands to conceal trafficking activity and avoid detection, while later survivor criticism pushed the point further: that this was not merely institutional failure, but a pattern of access, favors, silence, and protection.<br /><br />The allegations have centered on the idea that Epstein embedded himself into the territory through money, jobs, political access, permits, business entities, tax advantages, and relationships with influential locals, making him more than just a rich landowner with a private island. Survivors have argued that the USVI environment gave Epstein unusual freedom: private islands, staff, boats, aircraft, local business structures, and officials who allegedly failed to meaningfully challenge what was happening in plain sight. While not every official has been accused of a crime, and many allegations remain contested, the outrage is that Epstein’s operation appears to have flourished in a place where too many people had reason to ask questions and too few people did. That is why survivors and critics frame the USVI piece of the Epstein story as more than geography; they see it as a case study in how elite money can bend a small jurisdiction around itself until abuse becomes protected by bureaucracy, influence, and silence.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72872912</guid><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 10:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72872912/megadidusviconspirewithepstein.mp3" length="47302574" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/605de144-28c3-4b3a-b3db-972ffe0976fd/605de144-28c3-4b3a-b3db-972ffe0976fd.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/605de144-28c3-4b3a-b3db-972ffe0976fd/605de144-28c3-4b3a-b3db-972ffe0976fd.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/605de144-28c3-4b3a-b3db-972ffe0976fd/605de144-28c3-4b3a-b3db-972ffe0976fd.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Epstein survivors and their attorneys have alleged that Jeffrey Epstein did not operate in the U.S. Virgin Islands as a lone predator hiding from the system, but as a wealthy, connected trafficker whose presence was tolerated, facilitated, and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Epstein survivors and their attorneys have alleged that Jeffrey Epstein did not operate in the U.S. Virgin Islands as a lone predator hiding from the system, but as a wealthy, connected trafficker whose presence was tolerated, facilitated, and protected by people with power. In litigation and public filings, survivors have described Little St. James and Great St. James as isolated sites where young women and girls were abused, trafficked, controlled, and cut off from ordinary avenues of escape or help. The core allegation is that USVI officials, agencies, and politically connected figures either looked the other way, accepted Epstein’s money and influence, or helped create the conditions that allowed him to keep operating for years. The USVI’s own 2020 enforcement action against Epstein’s estate accused his network of using the islands to conceal trafficking activity and avoid detection, while later survivor criticism pushed the point further: that this was not merely institutional failure, but a pattern of access, favors, silence, and protection.<br /><br />The allegations have centered on the idea that Epstein embedded himself into the territory through money, jobs, political access, permits, business entities, tax advantages, and relationships with influential locals, making him more than just a rich landowner with a private island. Survivors have argued that the USVI environment gave Epstein unusual freedom: private islands, staff, boats, aircraft, local business structures, and officials who allegedly failed to meaningfully challenge what was happening in plain sight. While not every official has been accused of a crime, and many allegations remain contested, the outrage is that Epstein’s operation appears to have flourished in a place where too many people had reason to ask questions and too few people did. That is why survivors and critics frame the USVI piece of the Epstein story as more than geography; they see it as a case study in how elite money can bend a small jurisdiction around itself until abuse becomes protected by bureaucracy, influence, and silence.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2957</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   Jeffrey Epstein And The Video That Vanished (7/10/25)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-the-video-that-vanished-7-10-25--72872911</link><description><![CDATA[After Jeffrey Epstein’s first reported suicide attempt at MCC New York in July 2019, one of the most important pieces of evidence should have been surveillance footage from outside the cell area where he was being held with former police officer Nicholas Tartaglione. That video mattered because Epstein reportedly told lawyers that Tartaglione had attacked him, while other accounts suggested Epstein may have harmed himself or staged something to get moved. Either way, the camera footage should have helped clarify what happened during one of the most consequential moments before Epstein’s death. Instead, when Tartaglione’s defense team sought the footage, prosecutors first indicated it had been preserved, only to later admit that the wrong video had been saved and that the relevant footage was gone. The explanation was that MCC staff had mistakenly preserved footage from the wrong tier, while the actual footage from outside Epstein’s cell had been overwritten by the jail’s surveillance system.<br /><br />That explanation has never satisfied critics because it lands in the middle of a case already defined by impossible coincidences, bureaucratic failures, and missing accountability. The public was asked to believe that, in one of the most scrutinized federal detainee situations in modern history, the Bureau of Prisons failed to preserve basic surveillance footage from the first major warning sign before Epstein died. Even worse, the loss of that footage did not produce a clear, public accounting that answered the obvious questions: who was responsible for preserving it, who checked whether the correct footage had been saved, why the mistake was not discovered sooner, and why no one appeared to face meaningful consequences for losing evidence tied to Epstein’s safety. The result is a vacuum where suspicion thrives, because the official explanation may describe a clerical or technical failure, but it does not rationally explain how the federal government mishandled evidence this important in a case this explosive.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72872911</guid><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 08:30:01 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72872911/megamcctartaglionevanishingvideo.mp3" length="52765719" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1c68999c-e500-4126-9b6f-13e5d5cea3a7/1c68999c-e500-4126-9b6f-13e5d5cea3a7.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1c68999c-e500-4126-9b6f-13e5d5cea3a7/1c68999c-e500-4126-9b6f-13e5d5cea3a7.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1c68999c-e500-4126-9b6f-13e5d5cea3a7/1c68999c-e500-4126-9b6f-13e5d5cea3a7.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>After Jeffrey Epstein’s first reported suicide attempt at MCC New York in July 2019, one of the most important pieces of evidence should have been surveillance footage from outside the cell area where he was being held with former police officer...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[After Jeffrey Epstein’s first reported suicide attempt at MCC New York in July 2019, one of the most important pieces of evidence should have been surveillance footage from outside the cell area where he was being held with former police officer Nicholas Tartaglione. That video mattered because Epstein reportedly told lawyers that Tartaglione had attacked him, while other accounts suggested Epstein may have harmed himself or staged something to get moved. Either way, the camera footage should have helped clarify what happened during one of the most consequential moments before Epstein’s death. Instead, when Tartaglione’s defense team sought the footage, prosecutors first indicated it had been preserved, only to later admit that the wrong video had been saved and that the relevant footage was gone. The explanation was that MCC staff had mistakenly preserved footage from the wrong tier, while the actual footage from outside Epstein’s cell had been overwritten by the jail’s surveillance system.<br /><br />That explanation has never satisfied critics because it lands in the middle of a case already defined by impossible coincidences, bureaucratic failures, and missing accountability. The public was asked to believe that, in one of the most scrutinized federal detainee situations in modern history, the Bureau of Prisons failed to preserve basic surveillance footage from the first major warning sign before Epstein died. Even worse, the loss of that footage did not produce a clear, public accounting that answered the obvious questions: who was responsible for preserving it, who checked whether the correct footage had been saved, why the mistake was not discovered sooner, and why no one appeared to face meaningful consequences for losing evidence tied to Epstein’s safety. The result is a vacuum where suspicion thrives, because the official explanation may describe a clerical or technical failure, but it does not rationally explain how the federal government mishandled evidence this important in a case this explosive.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3298</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Former Prince Andrew And The Protection Provided To Him By The UK High Court (7/9/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-former-prince-andrew-and-the-protection-provided-to-him-by-the-uk-high-court-7-9-26--72872910</link><description><![CDATA[Prince Andrew has said he met Jeffrey Epstein in 1999 through Ghislaine Maxwell, whom Andrew had known for years; other reporting has suggested questions about whether the relationship may have started earlier, but the basic public version is that Maxwell acted as the bridge between the royal world and Epstein’s world. From there, Epstein was not kept at arm’s length. He was brought into royal spaces, appeared around Andrew at elite gatherings, and became close enough that Andrew stayed at Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse even after Epstein’s Florida conviction. Virginia Giuffre later alleged that Epstein and Maxwell trafficked her to Andrew when she was 17; Andrew has denied the allegations, said he did not recall meeting her, and settled Giuffre’s U.S. civil lawsuit in 2022 without admitting liability. The larger point is that Andrew was not some distant name in Epstein’s orbit. He was one of the most visible examples of how Epstein used proximity to royalty, money, and status to launder himself socially.<br /><br />As for the UK courts and institutions, the criticism is that Andrew benefited for years from layers of delay, privacy, deference, and institutional reluctance that ordinary people would never receive. The High Court was involved in the service process for Giuffre’s U.S. lawsuit, while Andrew’s lawyers fought over service issues and later tried to use sealed settlement language from Giuffre’s 2009 agreement with Epstein to shut the case down. Beyond the courts, UK police repeatedly declined to pursue Andrew over Giuffre-related allegations, while government and royal records tied to his trade envoy role were withheld for years before Parliament forced more disclosure in 2026. Those later disclosures intensified the perception that the British establishment had protected him—not always through one obvious court order, but through a fog of sealed papers, delayed accountability, official silence, and the old royal reflex of keeping embarrassing truths buried until outside pressure makes that impossible.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72872910</guid><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 06:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72872910/megaepsteinmetandyandyprotetcteduk.mp3" length="51493899" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/37c08352-a2c0-459d-92db-2eb4a76d32ef/37c08352-a2c0-459d-92db-2eb4a76d32ef.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/37c08352-a2c0-459d-92db-2eb4a76d32ef/37c08352-a2c0-459d-92db-2eb4a76d32ef.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/37c08352-a2c0-459d-92db-2eb4a76d32ef/37c08352-a2c0-459d-92db-2eb4a76d32ef.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Prince Andrew has said he met Jeffrey Epstein in 1999 through Ghislaine Maxwell, whom Andrew had known for years; other reporting has suggested questions about whether the relationship may have started earlier, but the basic public version is that...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Prince Andrew has said he met Jeffrey Epstein in 1999 through Ghislaine Maxwell, whom Andrew had known for years; other reporting has suggested questions about whether the relationship may have started earlier, but the basic public version is that Maxwell acted as the bridge between the royal world and Epstein’s world. From there, Epstein was not kept at arm’s length. He was brought into royal spaces, appeared around Andrew at elite gatherings, and became close enough that Andrew stayed at Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse even after Epstein’s Florida conviction. Virginia Giuffre later alleged that Epstein and Maxwell trafficked her to Andrew when she was 17; Andrew has denied the allegations, said he did not recall meeting her, and settled Giuffre’s U.S. civil lawsuit in 2022 without admitting liability. The larger point is that Andrew was not some distant name in Epstein’s orbit. He was one of the most visible examples of how Epstein used proximity to royalty, money, and status to launder himself socially.<br /><br />As for the UK courts and institutions, the criticism is that Andrew benefited for years from layers of delay, privacy, deference, and institutional reluctance that ordinary people would never receive. The High Court was involved in the service process for Giuffre’s U.S. lawsuit, while Andrew’s lawyers fought over service issues and later tried to use sealed settlement language from Giuffre’s 2009 agreement with Epstein to shut the case down. Beyond the courts, UK police repeatedly declined to pursue Andrew over Giuffre-related allegations, while government and royal records tied to his trade envoy role were withheld for years before Parliament forced more disclosure in 2026. Those later disclosures intensified the perception that the British establishment had protected him—not always through one obvious court order, but through a fog of sealed papers, delayed accountability, official silence, and the old royal reflex of keeping embarrassing truths buried until outside pressure makes that impossible.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3219</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Inside The OIG Interview:  The Testimony Of The Electrical Engineer From MCC (Part 4)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/inside-the-oig-interview-the-testimony-of-the-electrical-engineer-from-mcc-part-4--72892648</link><description><![CDATA[The document is a sworn statement from an electrical engineer assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York, given in the aftermath of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. In his testimony, the engineer outlines the condition and functionality of the facility’s electrical and surveillance infrastructure, specifically addressing whether any power failures or technical malfunctions could have impacted the operation of cameras or monitoring systems on the night Epstein died. He indicates that, based on his review and knowledge of the systems, there were no significant electrical outages or systemic failures that would have disabled the cameras covering Epstein’s housing unit during the relevant timeframe. His statement is meant to clarify that the infrastructure itself was not compromised by a power-related issue.<br /><br />The engineer further explains how the MCC’s surveillance systems were designed to operate, including backup power measures and redundancies intended to keep critical systems running even in the event of localized disruptions. His account suggests that if cameras were not recording or footage was unavailable, the cause would likely not be attributable to an electrical failure but rather to other factors, such as equipment issues, configuration problems, or human involvement. In the broader context, this sworn statement undercuts the notion that a simple technical malfunction explains the lack of usable surveillance footage, instead reinforcing the unresolved questions surrounding how monitoring systems failed at such a critical moment.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00064043.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00064043.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72892648</guid><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72892648/mccoigengineer4.mp3" length="11700393" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2ca03003-c27f-4e53-86ae-c32986948f84/2ca03003-c27f-4e53-86ae-c32986948f84.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2ca03003-c27f-4e53-86ae-c32986948f84/2ca03003-c27f-4e53-86ae-c32986948f84.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2ca03003-c27f-4e53-86ae-c32986948f84/2ca03003-c27f-4e53-86ae-c32986948f84.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The document is a sworn statement from an electrical engineer assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York, given in the aftermath of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. In his testimony, the engineer outlines the condition and functionality of...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The document is a sworn statement from an electrical engineer assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York, given in the aftermath of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. In his testimony, the engineer outlines the condition and functionality of the facility’s electrical and surveillance infrastructure, specifically addressing whether any power failures or technical malfunctions could have impacted the operation of cameras or monitoring systems on the night Epstein died. He indicates that, based on his review and knowledge of the systems, there were no significant electrical outages or systemic failures that would have disabled the cameras covering Epstein’s housing unit during the relevant timeframe. His statement is meant to clarify that the infrastructure itself was not compromised by a power-related issue.<br /><br />The engineer further explains how the MCC’s surveillance systems were designed to operate, including backup power measures and redundancies intended to keep critical systems running even in the event of localized disruptions. His account suggests that if cameras were not recording or footage was unavailable, the cause would likely not be attributable to an electrical failure but rather to other factors, such as equipment issues, configuration problems, or human involvement. In the broader context, this sworn statement undercuts the notion that a simple technical malfunction explains the lack of usable surveillance footage, instead reinforcing the unresolved questions surrounding how monitoring systems failed at such a critical moment.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00064043.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00064043.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>732</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Inside The OIG Interview:  The Testimony Of The Electrical Engineer From MCC (Part 3)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/inside-the-oig-interview-the-testimony-of-the-electrical-engineer-from-mcc-part-3--72892649</link><description><![CDATA[The document is a sworn statement from an electrical engineer assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York, given in the aftermath of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. In his testimony, the engineer outlines the condition and functionality of the facility’s electrical and surveillance infrastructure, specifically addressing whether any power failures or technical malfunctions could have impacted the operation of cameras or monitoring systems on the night Epstein died. He indicates that, based on his review and knowledge of the systems, there were no significant electrical outages or systemic failures that would have disabled the cameras covering Epstein’s housing unit during the relevant timeframe. His statement is meant to clarify that the infrastructure itself was not compromised by a power-related issue.<br /><br />The engineer further explains how the MCC’s surveillance systems were designed to operate, including backup power measures and redundancies intended to keep critical systems running even in the event of localized disruptions. His account suggests that if cameras were not recording or footage was unavailable, the cause would likely not be attributable to an electrical failure but rather to other factors, such as equipment issues, configuration problems, or human involvement. In the broader context, this sworn statement undercuts the notion that a simple technical malfunction explains the lack of usable surveillance footage, instead reinforcing the unresolved questions surrounding how monitoring systems failed at such a critical moment.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00064043.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00064043.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72892649</guid><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72892649/mccoigengineer3.mp3" length="11795270" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/200010bb-9449-4f21-aca7-c41f15fbb777/200010bb-9449-4f21-aca7-c41f15fbb777.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/200010bb-9449-4f21-aca7-c41f15fbb777/200010bb-9449-4f21-aca7-c41f15fbb777.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/200010bb-9449-4f21-aca7-c41f15fbb777/200010bb-9449-4f21-aca7-c41f15fbb777.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The document is a sworn statement from an electrical engineer assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York, given in the aftermath of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. In his testimony, the engineer outlines the condition and functionality of...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The document is a sworn statement from an electrical engineer assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York, given in the aftermath of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. In his testimony, the engineer outlines the condition and functionality of the facility’s electrical and surveillance infrastructure, specifically addressing whether any power failures or technical malfunctions could have impacted the operation of cameras or monitoring systems on the night Epstein died. He indicates that, based on his review and knowledge of the systems, there were no significant electrical outages or systemic failures that would have disabled the cameras covering Epstein’s housing unit during the relevant timeframe. His statement is meant to clarify that the infrastructure itself was not compromised by a power-related issue.<br /><br />The engineer further explains how the MCC’s surveillance systems were designed to operate, including backup power measures and redundancies intended to keep critical systems running even in the event of localized disruptions. His account suggests that if cameras were not recording or footage was unavailable, the cause would likely not be attributable to an electrical failure but rather to other factors, such as equipment issues, configuration problems, or human involvement. In the broader context, this sworn statement undercuts the notion that a simple technical malfunction explains the lack of usable surveillance footage, instead reinforcing the unresolved questions surrounding how monitoring systems failed at such a critical moment.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00064043.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00064043.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>738</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Inside The OIG Interview:  The Testimony Of The Electrical Engineer From MCC (Part 2)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/inside-the-oig-interview-the-testimony-of-the-electrical-engineer-from-mcc-part-2--72892645</link><description><![CDATA[The document is a sworn statement from an electrical engineer assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York, given in the aftermath of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. In his testimony, the engineer outlines the condition and functionality of the facility’s electrical and surveillance infrastructure, specifically addressing whether any power failures or technical malfunctions could have impacted the operation of cameras or monitoring systems on the night Epstein died. He indicates that, based on his review and knowledge of the systems, there were no significant electrical outages or systemic failures that would have disabled the cameras covering Epstein’s housing unit during the relevant timeframe. His statement is meant to clarify that the infrastructure itself was not compromised by a power-related issue.<br /><br />The engineer further explains how the MCC’s surveillance systems were designed to operate, including backup power measures and redundancies intended to keep critical systems running even in the event of localized disruptions. His account suggests that if cameras were not recording or footage was unavailable, the cause would likely not be attributable to an electrical failure but rather to other factors, such as equipment issues, configuration problems, or human involvement. In the broader context, this sworn statement undercuts the notion that a simple technical malfunction explains the lack of usable surveillance footage, instead reinforcing the unresolved questions surrounding how monitoring systems failed at such a critical moment.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00064043.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00064043.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72892645</guid><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72892645/mccoigengineer2.mp3" length="12652086" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1257705e-894f-4195-adbc-0e794b152117/1257705e-894f-4195-adbc-0e794b152117.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1257705e-894f-4195-adbc-0e794b152117/1257705e-894f-4195-adbc-0e794b152117.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1257705e-894f-4195-adbc-0e794b152117/1257705e-894f-4195-adbc-0e794b152117.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The document is a sworn statement from an electrical engineer assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York, given in the aftermath of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. In his testimony, the engineer outlines the condition and functionality of...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The document is a sworn statement from an electrical engineer assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York, given in the aftermath of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. In his testimony, the engineer outlines the condition and functionality of the facility’s electrical and surveillance infrastructure, specifically addressing whether any power failures or technical malfunctions could have impacted the operation of cameras or monitoring systems on the night Epstein died. He indicates that, based on his review and knowledge of the systems, there were no significant electrical outages or systemic failures that would have disabled the cameras covering Epstein’s housing unit during the relevant timeframe. His statement is meant to clarify that the infrastructure itself was not compromised by a power-related issue.<br /><br />The engineer further explains how the MCC’s surveillance systems were designed to operate, including backup power measures and redundancies intended to keep critical systems running even in the event of localized disruptions. His account suggests that if cameras were not recording or footage was unavailable, the cause would likely not be attributable to an electrical failure but rather to other factors, such as equipment issues, configuration problems, or human involvement. In the broader context, this sworn statement undercuts the notion that a simple technical malfunction explains the lack of usable surveillance footage, instead reinforcing the unresolved questions surrounding how monitoring systems failed at such a critical moment.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00064043.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00064043.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>791</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Inside The OIG Interview:  The Testimony Of The Electrical Engineer From MCC (Part 1)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/inside-the-oig-interview-the-testimony-of-the-electrical-engineer-from-mcc-part-1--72892646</link><description><![CDATA[The document is a sworn statement from an electrical engineer assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York, given in the aftermath of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. In his testimony, the engineer outlines the condition and functionality of the facility’s electrical and surveillance infrastructure, specifically addressing whether any power failures or technical malfunctions could have impacted the operation of cameras or monitoring systems on the night Epstein died. He indicates that, based on his review and knowledge of the systems, there were no significant electrical outages or systemic failures that would have disabled the cameras covering Epstein’s housing unit during the relevant timeframe. His statement is meant to clarify that the infrastructure itself was not compromised by a power-related issue.<br /><br />The engineer further explains how the MCC’s surveillance systems were designed to operate, including backup power measures and redundancies intended to keep critical systems running even in the event of localized disruptions. His account suggests that if cameras were not recording or footage was unavailable, the cause would likely not be attributable to an electrical failure but rather to other factors, such as equipment issues, configuration problems, or human involvement. In the broader context, this sworn statement undercuts the notion that a simple technical malfunction explains the lack of usable surveillance footage, instead reinforcing the unresolved questions surrounding how monitoring systems failed at such a critical moment.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00064043.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00064043.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72892646</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72892646/mccoigengineer1.mp3" length="12703913" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7c632628-fe5b-44d9-a520-a54ef0f050ac/7c632628-fe5b-44d9-a520-a54ef0f050ac.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7c632628-fe5b-44d9-a520-a54ef0f050ac/7c632628-fe5b-44d9-a520-a54ef0f050ac.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7c632628-fe5b-44d9-a520-a54ef0f050ac/7c632628-fe5b-44d9-a520-a54ef0f050ac.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The document is a sworn statement from an electrical engineer assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York, given in the aftermath of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. In his testimony, the engineer outlines the condition and functionality of...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The document is a sworn statement from an electrical engineer assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York, given in the aftermath of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. In his testimony, the engineer outlines the condition and functionality of the facility’s electrical and surveillance infrastructure, specifically addressing whether any power failures or technical malfunctions could have impacted the operation of cameras or monitoring systems on the night Epstein died. He indicates that, based on his review and knowledge of the systems, there were no significant electrical outages or systemic failures that would have disabled the cameras covering Epstein’s housing unit during the relevant timeframe. His statement is meant to clarify that the infrastructure itself was not compromised by a power-related issue.<br /><br />The engineer further explains how the MCC’s surveillance systems were designed to operate, including backup power measures and redundancies intended to keep critical systems running even in the event of localized disruptions. His account suggests that if cameras were not recording or footage was unavailable, the cause would likely not be attributable to an electrical failure but rather to other factors, such as equipment issues, configuration problems, or human involvement. In the broader context, this sworn statement undercuts the notion that a simple technical malfunction explains the lack of usable surveillance footage, instead reinforcing the unresolved questions surrounding how monitoring systems failed at such a critical moment.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00064043.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00064043.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>794</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The State vs. Tyler Robinson: Inside the Charlie Kirk Murder Trial (Part 2) (7/9/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-state-vs-tyler-robinson-inside-the-charlie-kirk-murder-trial-part-2-7-9-26--72892638</link><description><![CDATA[Charlie Kirk was killed in what amounts to a political assassination, and the gravity of that cannot be softened, blurred, or buried under the usual noise. This was not just another violent crime, not just another court case, and not just another headline for people to weaponize for a news cycle. It was the killing of a public political figure in front of the country, followed almost immediately by the rush to explain it, exploit it, minimize it, or turn it into proof of whatever people already believed. Tyler Robinson now stands accused of carrying out that attack, and prosecutors say their case is built around a trail of evidence that includes his movements, the weapon, physical evidence, digital communications, and the timeline that led from the shooting to his arrest. But the fact that someone has been charged does not mean the public gets to skip the hard part. The evidence still has to be examined, the state’s claims still have to be tested, the defense still has the right to challenge the case, and the courts still have to decide what can actually be proven.<br /><br />The larger point is that a case this explosive demands more than outrage, slogans, and prepackaged conclusions. Charlie Kirk’s death instantly became a national pressure point because it touched politics, public violence, institutional trust, media coverage, online speculation, and the way Americans now process tragedy through tribal loyalty instead of disciplined fact-finding. Every official statement matters, every gap in the timeline matters, every piece of evidence matters, and every claim made by prosecutors, investigators, pundits, politicians, and anonymous internet sleuths has to be separated from what is actually in the record. The case is about the killing itself, the man accused, the evidence prosecutors say ties him to the crime, the questions the defense may raise, and the broader consequences of a political assassination unfolding in a country already primed to distrust everything. No one should be allowed to declare the truth simply because their preferred narrative feels right. The only way to handle a case like this is to walk through the record, piece by piece, and force every claim to survive contact with the evidence.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72892638</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72892638/9ed6361b_a8b3_4749_859a_b641eef5fd8d.mp3" length="12943404" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d830fb56-78c6-4594-98b9-b53596d1b178/d830fb56-78c6-4594-98b9-b53596d1b178.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d830fb56-78c6-4594-98b9-b53596d1b178/d830fb56-78c6-4594-98b9-b53596d1b178.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d830fb56-78c6-4594-98b9-b53596d1b178/d830fb56-78c6-4594-98b9-b53596d1b178.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Charlie Kirk was killed in what amounts to a political assassination, and the gravity of that cannot be softened, blurred, or buried under the usual noise. This was not just another violent crime, not just another court case, and not just another...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Charlie Kirk was killed in what amounts to a political assassination, and the gravity of that cannot be softened, blurred, or buried under the usual noise. This was not just another violent crime, not just another court case, and not just another headline for people to weaponize for a news cycle. It was the killing of a public political figure in front of the country, followed almost immediately by the rush to explain it, exploit it, minimize it, or turn it into proof of whatever people already believed. Tyler Robinson now stands accused of carrying out that attack, and prosecutors say their case is built around a trail of evidence that includes his movements, the weapon, physical evidence, digital communications, and the timeline that led from the shooting to his arrest. But the fact that someone has been charged does not mean the public gets to skip the hard part. The evidence still has to be examined, the state’s claims still have to be tested, the defense still has the right to challenge the case, and the courts still have to decide what can actually be proven.<br /><br />The larger point is that a case this explosive demands more than outrage, slogans, and prepackaged conclusions. Charlie Kirk’s death instantly became a national pressure point because it touched politics, public violence, institutional trust, media coverage, online speculation, and the way Americans now process tragedy through tribal loyalty instead of disciplined fact-finding. Every official statement matters, every gap in the timeline matters, every piece of evidence matters, and every claim made by prosecutors, investigators, pundits, politicians, and anonymous internet sleuths has to be separated from what is actually in the record. The case is about the killing itself, the man accused, the evidence prosecutors say ties him to the crime, the questions the defense may raise, and the broader consequences of a political assassination unfolding in a country already primed to distrust everything. No one should be allowed to declare the truth simply because their preferred narrative feels right. The only way to handle a case like this is to walk through the record, piece by piece, and force every claim to survive contact with the evidence.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>809</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvu</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The State vs. Tyler Robinson: Inside the Charlie Kirk Murder Trial (Part 1) (7/9/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-state-vs-tyler-robinson-inside-the-charlie-kirk-murder-trial-part-1-7-9-26--72892637</link><description><![CDATA[Charlie Kirk was killed in what amounts to a political assassination, and the gravity of that cannot be softened, blurred, or buried under the usual noise. This was not just another violent crime, not just another court case, and not just another headline for people to weaponize for a news cycle. It was the killing of a public political figure in front of the country, followed almost immediately by the rush to explain it, exploit it, minimize it, or turn it into proof of whatever people already believed. Tyler Robinson now stands accused of carrying out that attack, and prosecutors say their case is built around a trail of evidence that includes his movements, the weapon, physical evidence, digital communications, and the timeline that led from the shooting to his arrest. But the fact that someone has been charged does not mean the public gets to skip the hard part. The evidence still has to be examined, the state’s claims still have to be tested, the defense still has the right to challenge the case, and the courts still have to decide what can actually be proven.<br /><br />The larger point is that a case this explosive demands more than outrage, slogans, and prepackaged conclusions. Charlie Kirk’s death instantly became a national pressure point because it touched politics, public violence, institutional trust, media coverage, online speculation, and the way Americans now process tragedy through tribal loyalty instead of disciplined fact-finding. Every official statement matters, every gap in the timeline matters, every piece of evidence matters, and every claim made by prosecutors, investigators, pundits, politicians, and anonymous internet sleuths has to be separated from what is actually in the record. The case is about the killing itself, the man accused, the evidence prosecutors say ties him to the crime, the questions the defense may raise, and the broader consequences of a political assassination unfolding in a country already primed to distrust everything. No one should be allowed to declare the truth simply because their preferred narrative feels right. The only way to handle a case like this is to walk through the record, piece by piece, and force every claim to survive contact with the evidence.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72892637</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 18:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72892637/308e40f5_0abd_46cd_bb15_f417bf17d2f8.mp3" length="15491283" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b7ddb6c7-2457-4d16-8c5c-3dc2bc1a0527/b7ddb6c7-2457-4d16-8c5c-3dc2bc1a0527.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b7ddb6c7-2457-4d16-8c5c-3dc2bc1a0527/b7ddb6c7-2457-4d16-8c5c-3dc2bc1a0527.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b7ddb6c7-2457-4d16-8c5c-3dc2bc1a0527/b7ddb6c7-2457-4d16-8c5c-3dc2bc1a0527.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Charlie Kirk was killed in what amounts to a political assassination, and the gravity of that cannot be softened, blurred, or buried under the usual noise. This was not just another violent crime, not just another court case, and not just another...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Charlie Kirk was killed in what amounts to a political assassination, and the gravity of that cannot be softened, blurred, or buried under the usual noise. This was not just another violent crime, not just another court case, and not just another headline for people to weaponize for a news cycle. It was the killing of a public political figure in front of the country, followed almost immediately by the rush to explain it, exploit it, minimize it, or turn it into proof of whatever people already believed. Tyler Robinson now stands accused of carrying out that attack, and prosecutors say their case is built around a trail of evidence that includes his movements, the weapon, physical evidence, digital communications, and the timeline that led from the shooting to his arrest. But the fact that someone has been charged does not mean the public gets to skip the hard part. The evidence still has to be examined, the state’s claims still have to be tested, the defense still has the right to challenge the case, and the courts still have to decide what can actually be proven.<br /><br />The larger point is that a case this explosive demands more than outrage, slogans, and prepackaged conclusions. Charlie Kirk’s death instantly became a national pressure point because it touched politics, public violence, institutional trust, media coverage, online speculation, and the way Americans now process tragedy through tribal loyalty instead of disciplined fact-finding. Every official statement matters, every gap in the timeline matters, every piece of evidence matters, and every claim made by prosecutors, investigators, pundits, politicians, and anonymous internet sleuths has to be separated from what is actually in the record. The case is about the killing itself, the man accused, the evidence prosecutors say ties him to the crime, the questions the defense may raise, and the broader consequences of a political assassination unfolding in a country already primed to distrust everything. No one should be allowed to declare the truth simply because their preferred narrative feels right. The only way to handle a case like this is to walk through the record, piece by piece, and force every claim to survive contact with the evidence.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>969</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvu</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Prince Andrew’s Alibi is Put On Blast (7/9/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/prince-andrew-s-alibi-is-put-on-blast-7-9-26--72889780</link><description><![CDATA[Prince Andrew’s infamous Pizza Express alibi is framed as more than just an absurd footnote in the Epstein scandal; it is presented as a symbol of institutional cowardice and elite protection. The core outrage is that a chain restaurant appeared more motivated to scrutinize the Woking claim than Scotland Yard or the broader British establishment seemed to be. Instead of treating Andrew’s statement as a serious, testable alibi that demanded receipts, staff interviews, timelines, records, and hard verification, the system let it become a joke, a meme, and a public spectacle. The monologue argues that if Andrew had been an ordinary man, investigators would have ripped the claim apart immediately, but because he was royal, the response became cautious, delicate, and deferential.<br /><br />The deeper point is that the Pizza Express story exposes the double standard at the heart of the Epstein fallout: survivors are relentlessly questioned, doubted, and dissected, while powerful men are granted space, patience, and institutional softness. Andrew’s alibi is portrayed as a ridiculous but revealing window into how the justice system behaves differently when titles, palaces, reputations, and establishment interests are involved. The outrage is not really about pizza or Woking, but about a system that seems aggressive when dealing with the powerless and suddenly timid when confronting the powerful. In that sense, the monologue presents the Pizza Express episode as a humiliating emblem of royal exceptionalism, where a survivor gets a microscope, a prince gets a cushion, and accountability gets buried under privilege.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72889780</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72889780/andrewpizzaalibimonologue.mp3" length="10561036" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a30c7ab2-9cd3-4241-a21a-dc055558fcb3/a30c7ab2-9cd3-4241-a21a-dc055558fcb3.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a30c7ab2-9cd3-4241-a21a-dc055558fcb3/a30c7ab2-9cd3-4241-a21a-dc055558fcb3.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a30c7ab2-9cd3-4241-a21a-dc055558fcb3/a30c7ab2-9cd3-4241-a21a-dc055558fcb3.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Prince Andrew’s infamous Pizza Express alibi is framed as more than just an absurd footnote in the Epstein scandal; it is presented as a symbol of institutional cowardice and elite protection. The core outrage is that a chain restaurant appeared more...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Prince Andrew’s infamous Pizza Express alibi is framed as more than just an absurd footnote in the Epstein scandal; it is presented as a symbol of institutional cowardice and elite protection. The core outrage is that a chain restaurant appeared more motivated to scrutinize the Woking claim than Scotland Yard or the broader British establishment seemed to be. Instead of treating Andrew’s statement as a serious, testable alibi that demanded receipts, staff interviews, timelines, records, and hard verification, the system let it become a joke, a meme, and a public spectacle. The monologue argues that if Andrew had been an ordinary man, investigators would have ripped the claim apart immediately, but because he was royal, the response became cautious, delicate, and deferential.<br /><br />The deeper point is that the Pizza Express story exposes the double standard at the heart of the Epstein fallout: survivors are relentlessly questioned, doubted, and dissected, while powerful men are granted space, patience, and institutional softness. Andrew’s alibi is portrayed as a ridiculous but revealing window into how the justice system behaves differently when titles, palaces, reputations, and establishment interests are involved. The outrage is not really about pizza or Woking, but about a system that seems aggressive when dealing with the powerless and suddenly timid when confronting the powerful. In that sense, the monologue presents the Pizza Express episode as a humiliating emblem of royal exceptionalism, where a survivor gets a microscope, a prince gets a cushion, and accountability gets buried under privilege.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>661</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>One Year In, The Epstein Inquiry Still Has More Questions Than Answers (7/9/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/one-year-in-the-epstein-inquiry-still-has-more-questions-than-answers-7-9-26--72887420</link><description><![CDATA[Congress’s Epstein inquiry has now been running for nearly a year, but the investigation has produced far more frustration than accountability. Lawmakers have interviewed major figures, pushed for file releases, questioned former officials, and leaned on the Justice Department for answers, yet they still have little to show when it comes to criminal culpability beyond Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Survivors and members of Congress remain angry that the government has not clearly explained why more people in Epstein’s orbit have not faced investigation or prosecution, especially given the years of allegations, financial trails, and powerful associations surrounding him. The inquiry has also exposed continuing distrust of the DOJ, particularly over redactions, delayed releases, and the handling of sensitive records.<br /><br />The central problem is that the investigation has become a test of whether Congress can force real transparency from institutions that have spent years managing the Epstein fallout instead of fully resolving it. Survivors are still demanding recognition, accountability, and a clear accounting of how Epstein was allowed to operate for so long, while lawmakers are still chasing basic answers about government failures, possible financial crimes, and the people who enabled or benefited from his network. The inquiry has created headlines and political pressure, but not the kind of definitive reckoning many expected. One year in, the Epstein investigation remains stuck in the same familiar place: documents released in pieces, officials dodging hard questions, survivors left unsatisfied, and the public still wondering who was protected and why.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://nationalpost.com/news/world/one-year-in-epstein-inquiry-has-found-few-answers" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">One year in, Epstein inquiry has found few answers | National Post</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72887420</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 14:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72887420/comercomittee1yearfewanswers.mp3" length="15342071" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/622b46a7-08c9-4362-ab24-4614b35c5e58/622b46a7-08c9-4362-ab24-4614b35c5e58.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/622b46a7-08c9-4362-ab24-4614b35c5e58/622b46a7-08c9-4362-ab24-4614b35c5e58.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/622b46a7-08c9-4362-ab24-4614b35c5e58/622b46a7-08c9-4362-ab24-4614b35c5e58.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Congress’s Epstein inquiry has now been running for nearly a year, but the investigation has produced far more frustration than accountability. Lawmakers have interviewed major figures, pushed for file releases, questioned former officials, and leaned...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Congress’s Epstein inquiry has now been running for nearly a year, but the investigation has produced far more frustration than accountability. Lawmakers have interviewed major figures, pushed for file releases, questioned former officials, and leaned on the Justice Department for answers, yet they still have little to show when it comes to criminal culpability beyond Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Survivors and members of Congress remain angry that the government has not clearly explained why more people in Epstein’s orbit have not faced investigation or prosecution, especially given the years of allegations, financial trails, and powerful associations surrounding him. The inquiry has also exposed continuing distrust of the DOJ, particularly over redactions, delayed releases, and the handling of sensitive records.<br /><br />The central problem is that the investigation has become a test of whether Congress can force real transparency from institutions that have spent years managing the Epstein fallout instead of fully resolving it. Survivors are still demanding recognition, accountability, and a clear accounting of how Epstein was allowed to operate for so long, while lawmakers are still chasing basic answers about government failures, possible financial crimes, and the people who enabled or benefited from his network. The inquiry has created headlines and political pressure, but not the kind of definitive reckoning many expected. One year in, the Epstein investigation remains stuck in the same familiar place: documents released in pieces, officials dodging hard questions, survivors left unsatisfied, and the public still wondering who was protected and why.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://nationalpost.com/news/world/one-year-in-epstein-inquiry-has-found-few-answers" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">One year in, Epstein inquiry has found few answers | National Post</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>959</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>How The Graham Platner Scandal Undercut Democratic Epstein Messaging (7/9/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/how-the-graham-platner-scandal-undercut-democratic-epstein-messaging-7-9-26--72887422</link><description><![CDATA[Democrats have spent the past year using the Epstein issue as a platform for moral outrage, demanding transparency, accountability, and consequences for powerful people who looked the other way. But the Graham Platner scandal exposes the same selective blindness inside their own political operation. Platner was elevated as an authentic, populist Democratic Senate candidate despite serious warning signs, public controversies, and disturbing allegations that eventually made him politically radioactive. The central hypocrisy is not that Democrats were wrong to pursue Epstein accountability, but that they preached about institutional protection and survivor-centered justice while tolerating a deeply flawed candidate when he was useful to their own electoral goals.<br /><br />The collapse of support for Platner only came after the scandal became impossible to manage, making the party’s moral posture look more like damage control than principle. If Democrats argue that proximity, silence, enabling, and ignored red flags matter in the Epstein world, then those same standards must apply in their own backyard. Endorsements are transfers of credibility, and the politicians who boosted Platner cannot simply walk away once the cost becomes too high. The larger point is that selective morality poisons public trust: a party cannot credibly condemn coverups and institutional cowardice while excusing its own version of political convenience, delayed outrage, and strategic blindness.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72887422</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72887422/letstalkplatner.mp3" length="19752377" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/02d28735-8d50-41b5-8150-d470e0eee40e/02d28735-8d50-41b5-8150-d470e0eee40e.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/02d28735-8d50-41b5-8150-d470e0eee40e/02d28735-8d50-41b5-8150-d470e0eee40e.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/02d28735-8d50-41b5-8150-d470e0eee40e/02d28735-8d50-41b5-8150-d470e0eee40e.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Democrats have spent the past year using the Epstein issue as a platform for moral outrage, demanding transparency, accountability, and consequences for powerful people who looked the other way. But the Graham Platner scandal exposes the same...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Democrats have spent the past year using the Epstein issue as a platform for moral outrage, demanding transparency, accountability, and consequences for powerful people who looked the other way. But the Graham Platner scandal exposes the same selective blindness inside their own political operation. Platner was elevated as an authentic, populist Democratic Senate candidate despite serious warning signs, public controversies, and disturbing allegations that eventually made him politically radioactive. The central hypocrisy is not that Democrats were wrong to pursue Epstein accountability, but that they preached about institutional protection and survivor-centered justice while tolerating a deeply flawed candidate when he was useful to their own electoral goals.<br /><br />The collapse of support for Platner only came after the scandal became impossible to manage, making the party’s moral posture look more like damage control than principle. If Democrats argue that proximity, silence, enabling, and ignored red flags matter in the Epstein world, then those same standards must apply in their own backyard. Endorsements are transfers of credibility, and the politicians who boosted Platner cannot simply walk away once the cost becomes too high. The larger point is that selective morality poisons public trust: a party cannot credibly condemn coverups and institutional cowardice while excusing its own version of political convenience, delayed outrage, and strategic blindness.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1235</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Eric Swalwell Didn’t  Advocate for Epstein Survivors—He Used Them As Props (7/8/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-eric-swalwell-didn-t-advocate-for-epstein-survivors-he-used-them-as-props-7-8-26--72856270</link><description><![CDATA[The controversy surrounding Eric Swalwell centers on a stark clash between the moral image he built and the allegations that later emerged against him. For years, he positioned himself as a vocal advocate against abuse of power, especially in the wake of the Jeffrey Epstein scandal, aligning himself publicly with survivors and presenting himself as a champion of accountability. That image was reinforced through high-profile gestures, including bringing survivor Theresa Helm to the State of the Union as a symbol of solidarity. However, the emergence of serious allegations—while unproven—created a direct tension with that carefully cultivated persona. His subsequent resignation intensified public scrutiny, not as proof of wrongdoing, but as a signal that the situation had escalated beyond simple political optics. The result has been a sharp backlash rooted in perceived hypocrisy, as the gap between his public messaging and the allegations against him became impossible for many to ignore.<br /><br />Beyond the individual controversy, the situation highlights a broader frustration with how political figures engage with survivor advocacy. When survivors are elevated in high-visibility moments, it creates an expectation of sincerity and integrity from the politicians involved. If that integrity is later called into question, those gestures can be reinterpreted as performative or strategic rather than genuine. This dynamic risks eroding trust—not just in one individual, but in the broader system of political accountability—especially in a post-Epstein environment already shaped by skepticism toward elite power structures. For survivors like Theresa Helm, the implications are deeply personal, as moments intended to represent support can feel compromised when the surrounding narrative shifts. Ultimately, the controversy underscores how quickly moral authority can collapse when allegations emerge, and how damaging that collapse can be to both public trust and the credibility of advocacy tied to real human trauma.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72856270</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72856270/megaswallwellpelosi.mp3" length="57102463" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/64ef3ec3-6b9b-41c6-89ac-f55b03e004d1/64ef3ec3-6b9b-41c6-89ac-f55b03e004d1.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/64ef3ec3-6b9b-41c6-89ac-f55b03e004d1/64ef3ec3-6b9b-41c6-89ac-f55b03e004d1.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/64ef3ec3-6b9b-41c6-89ac-f55b03e004d1/64ef3ec3-6b9b-41c6-89ac-f55b03e004d1.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The controversy surrounding Eric Swalwell centers on a stark clash between the moral image he built and the allegations that later emerged against him. For years, he positioned himself as a vocal advocate against abuse of power, especially in the wake...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The controversy surrounding Eric Swalwell centers on a stark clash between the moral image he built and the allegations that later emerged against him. For years, he positioned himself as a vocal advocate against abuse of power, especially in the wake of the Jeffrey Epstein scandal, aligning himself publicly with survivors and presenting himself as a champion of accountability. That image was reinforced through high-profile gestures, including bringing survivor Theresa Helm to the State of the Union as a symbol of solidarity. However, the emergence of serious allegations—while unproven—created a direct tension with that carefully cultivated persona. His subsequent resignation intensified public scrutiny, not as proof of wrongdoing, but as a signal that the situation had escalated beyond simple political optics. The result has been a sharp backlash rooted in perceived hypocrisy, as the gap between his public messaging and the allegations against him became impossible for many to ignore.<br /><br />Beyond the individual controversy, the situation highlights a broader frustration with how political figures engage with survivor advocacy. When survivors are elevated in high-visibility moments, it creates an expectation of sincerity and integrity from the politicians involved. If that integrity is later called into question, those gestures can be reinterpreted as performative or strategic rather than genuine. This dynamic risks eroding trust—not just in one individual, but in the broader system of political accountability—especially in a post-Epstein environment already shaped by skepticism toward elite power structures. For survivors like Theresa Helm, the implications are deeply personal, as moments intended to represent support can feel compromised when the surrounding narrative shifts. Ultimately, the controversy underscores how quickly moral authority can collapse when allegations emerge, and how damaging that collapse can be to both public trust and the credibility of advocacy tied to real human trauma.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3569</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The OIG Report Detailing The Investigation Into Epstein's NPA (Part 59-62) (7/8/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-oig-report-detailing-the-investigation-into-epstein-s-npa-part-59-62-7-8-26--72855211</link><description><![CDATA[The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein’s high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.<br /><br />Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/opr/page/file/1336471/dl" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">dl (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72855211</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 08:30:01 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72855211/megaoignpa59n60n61n62.mp3" length="49364367" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/798ac31a-395e-405b-882a-b2a5ad6d863a/798ac31a-395e-405b-882a-b2a5ad6d863a.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/798ac31a-395e-405b-882a-b2a5ad6d863a/798ac31a-395e-405b-882a-b2a5ad6d863a.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/798ac31a-395e-405b-882a-b2a5ad6d863a/798ac31a-395e-405b-882a-b2a5ad6d863a.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein’s high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.<br /><br />Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/opr/page/file/1336471/dl" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">dl (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3086</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The OIG Report Detailing The Investigation Into Epstein's NPA (Part 55-58) (7/8/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-oig-report-detailing-the-investigation-into-epstein-s-npa-part-55-58-7-8-26--72855212</link><description><![CDATA[The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein’s high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.<br /><br />Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/opr/page/file/1336471/dl" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">dl (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72855212</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72855212/megaoignpa55n56n57n58.mp3" length="44658564" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/04c17006-60f6-4750-b242-88eb4a974d04/04c17006-60f6-4750-b242-88eb4a974d04.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/04c17006-60f6-4750-b242-88eb4a974d04/04c17006-60f6-4750-b242-88eb4a974d04.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/04c17006-60f6-4750-b242-88eb4a974d04/04c17006-60f6-4750-b242-88eb4a974d04.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein’s high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.<br /><br />Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/opr/page/file/1336471/dl" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">dl (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2792</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The OIG Report Into Jeffrey Epstein's Death: Conclusions And Recommendations (Chapter 7) (Part 5)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-oig-report-into-jeffrey-epstein-s-death-conclusions-and-recommendations-chapter-7-part-5--72805686</link><description><![CDATA[The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report on Jeffrey Epstein's death in federal custody revealed severe lapses in protocol, negligence, and misconduct by Bureau of Prisons (BOP) staff at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York. Epstein, who was awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges, died of apparent suicide on August 10, 2019. The report found that staff failed to conduct regular 30-minute checks on Epstein’s cell, as required, and that surveillance cameras in his unit were either inoperative or not monitored adequately. The night of Epstein's death, officers on duty had fallen asleep or were otherwise occupied, leaving him unsupervised for hours, which the OIG noted as a direct violation of BOP policies. These failures contributed to the conditions that allowed Epstein the opportunity to take his own life.<br /><br />The report also highlighted a pattern of understaffing, low morale, and inadequate training at the facility, which OIG officials noted could have affected the staff’s attentiveness and contributed to policy non-compliance. Despite the extensive scrutiny surrounding Epstein, including prior suicide attempts, the OIG noted that prison staff were inadequately briefed on his heightened risk level. This lack of communication, combined with the failure of supervisory staff to enforce accountability, created an environment where critical protocols were ignored. The report concluded that systemic issues within the BOP were likely contributors to the failures in Epstein’s case and recommended measures to improve oversight, ensure policy adherence, and address structural weaknesses in the federal prison system.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72805686</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 02:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72805686/epsteinoigchapter7prt5.mp3" length="9778199" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c85807c1-fa3f-4ce9-864c-70f448a5eeb4/c85807c1-fa3f-4ce9-864c-70f448a5eeb4.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c85807c1-fa3f-4ce9-864c-70f448a5eeb4/c85807c1-fa3f-4ce9-864c-70f448a5eeb4.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c85807c1-fa3f-4ce9-864c-70f448a5eeb4/c85807c1-fa3f-4ce9-864c-70f448a5eeb4.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report on Jeffrey Epstein's death in federal custody revealed severe lapses in protocol, negligence, and misconduct by Bureau of Prisons (BOP) staff at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report on Jeffrey Epstein's death in federal custody revealed severe lapses in protocol, negligence, and misconduct by Bureau of Prisons (BOP) staff at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York. Epstein, who was awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges, died of apparent suicide on August 10, 2019. The report found that staff failed to conduct regular 30-minute checks on Epstein’s cell, as required, and that surveillance cameras in his unit were either inoperative or not monitored adequately. The night of Epstein's death, officers on duty had fallen asleep or were otherwise occupied, leaving him unsupervised for hours, which the OIG noted as a direct violation of BOP policies. These failures contributed to the conditions that allowed Epstein the opportunity to take his own life.<br /><br />The report also highlighted a pattern of understaffing, low morale, and inadequate training at the facility, which OIG officials noted could have affected the staff’s attentiveness and contributed to policy non-compliance. Despite the extensive scrutiny surrounding Epstein, including prior suicide attempts, the OIG noted that prison staff were inadequately briefed on his heightened risk level. This lack of communication, combined with the failure of supervisory staff to enforce accountability, created an environment where critical protocols were ignored. The report concluded that systemic issues within the BOP were likely contributors to the failures in Epstein’s case and recommended measures to improve oversight, ensure policy adherence, and address structural weaknesses in the federal prison system.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>612</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The OIG Report Into Jeffrey Epstein's Death: Conclusions And Recommendations (Chapter 7) (Part 4)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-oig-report-into-jeffrey-epstein-s-death-conclusions-and-recommendations-chapter-7-part-4--72805689</link><description><![CDATA[The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report on Jeffrey Epstein's death in federal custody revealed severe lapses in protocol, negligence, and misconduct by Bureau of Prisons (BOP) staff at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York. Epstein, who was awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges, died of apparent suicide on August 10, 2019. The report found that staff failed to conduct regular 30-minute checks on Epstein’s cell, as required, and that surveillance cameras in his unit were either inoperative or not monitored adequately. The night of Epstein's death, officers on duty had fallen asleep or were otherwise occupied, leaving him unsupervised for hours, which the OIG noted as a direct violation of BOP policies. These failures contributed to the conditions that allowed Epstein the opportunity to take his own life.<br /><br />The report also highlighted a pattern of understaffing, low morale, and inadequate training at the facility, which OIG officials noted could have affected the staff’s attentiveness and contributed to policy non-compliance. Despite the extensive scrutiny surrounding Epstein, including prior suicide attempts, the OIG noted that prison staff were inadequately briefed on his heightened risk level. This lack of communication, combined with the failure of supervisory staff to enforce accountability, created an environment where critical protocols were ignored. The report concluded that systemic issues within the BOP were likely contributors to the failures in Epstein’s case and recommended measures to improve oversight, ensure policy adherence, and address structural weaknesses in the federal prison system.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72805689</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 00:30:01 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72805689/epsteinoigchapter7prt4.mp3" length="12137578" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4b9214b8-6556-4dfd-bcf9-573b91aee26b/4b9214b8-6556-4dfd-bcf9-573b91aee26b.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4b9214b8-6556-4dfd-bcf9-573b91aee26b/4b9214b8-6556-4dfd-bcf9-573b91aee26b.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4b9214b8-6556-4dfd-bcf9-573b91aee26b/4b9214b8-6556-4dfd-bcf9-573b91aee26b.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report on Jeffrey Epstein's death in federal custody revealed severe lapses in protocol, negligence, and misconduct by Bureau of Prisons (BOP) staff at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report on Jeffrey Epstein's death in federal custody revealed severe lapses in protocol, negligence, and misconduct by Bureau of Prisons (BOP) staff at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York. Epstein, who was awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges, died of apparent suicide on August 10, 2019. The report found that staff failed to conduct regular 30-minute checks on Epstein’s cell, as required, and that surveillance cameras in his unit were either inoperative or not monitored adequately. The night of Epstein's death, officers on duty had fallen asleep or were otherwise occupied, leaving him unsupervised for hours, which the OIG noted as a direct violation of BOP policies. These failures contributed to the conditions that allowed Epstein the opportunity to take his own life.<br /><br />The report also highlighted a pattern of understaffing, low morale, and inadequate training at the facility, which OIG officials noted could have affected the staff’s attentiveness and contributed to policy non-compliance. Despite the extensive scrutiny surrounding Epstein, including prior suicide attempts, the OIG noted that prison staff were inadequately briefed on his heightened risk level. This lack of communication, combined with the failure of supervisory staff to enforce accountability, created an environment where critical protocols were ignored. The report concluded that systemic issues within the BOP were likely contributors to the failures in Epstein’s case and recommended measures to improve oversight, ensure policy adherence, and address structural weaknesses in the federal prison system.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>759</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The OIG Report Into Jeffrey Epstein's Death: Conclusions And Recommendations (Chapter 7) (Part 3)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-oig-report-into-jeffrey-epstein-s-death-conclusions-and-recommendations-chapter-7-part-3--72805690</link><description><![CDATA[The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report on Jeffrey Epstein's death in federal custody revealed severe lapses in protocol, negligence, and misconduct by Bureau of Prisons (BOP) staff at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York. Epstein, who was awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges, died of apparent suicide on August 10, 2019. The report found that staff failed to conduct regular 30-minute checks on Epstein’s cell, as required, and that surveillance cameras in his unit were either inoperative or not monitored adequately. The night of Epstein's death, officers on duty had fallen asleep or were otherwise occupied, leaving him unsupervised for hours, which the OIG noted as a direct violation of BOP policies. These failures contributed to the conditions that allowed Epstein the opportunity to take his own life.<br /><br />The report also highlighted a pattern of understaffing, low morale, and inadequate training at the facility, which OIG officials noted could have affected the staff’s attentiveness and contributed to policy non-compliance. Despite the extensive scrutiny surrounding Epstein, including prior suicide attempts, the OIG noted that prison staff were inadequately briefed on his heightened risk level. This lack of communication, combined with the failure of supervisory staff to enforce accountability, created an environment where critical protocols were ignored. The report concluded that systemic issues within the BOP were likely contributors to the failures in Epstein’s case and recommended measures to improve oversight, ensure policy adherence, and address structural weaknesses in the federal prison system.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72805690</guid><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72805690/epsteinoigchapter7prt3.mp3" length="12863573" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/08e4c3b0-ba11-4d6a-9f53-06202178dfc2/08e4c3b0-ba11-4d6a-9f53-06202178dfc2.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/08e4c3b0-ba11-4d6a-9f53-06202178dfc2/08e4c3b0-ba11-4d6a-9f53-06202178dfc2.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/08e4c3b0-ba11-4d6a-9f53-06202178dfc2/08e4c3b0-ba11-4d6a-9f53-06202178dfc2.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report on Jeffrey Epstein's death in federal custody revealed severe lapses in protocol, negligence, and misconduct by Bureau of Prisons (BOP) staff at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report on Jeffrey Epstein's death in federal custody revealed severe lapses in protocol, negligence, and misconduct by Bureau of Prisons (BOP) staff at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York. Epstein, who was awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges, died of apparent suicide on August 10, 2019. The report found that staff failed to conduct regular 30-minute checks on Epstein’s cell, as required, and that surveillance cameras in his unit were either inoperative or not monitored adequately. The night of Epstein's death, officers on duty had fallen asleep or were otherwise occupied, leaving him unsupervised for hours, which the OIG noted as a direct violation of BOP policies. These failures contributed to the conditions that allowed Epstein the opportunity to take his own life.<br /><br />The report also highlighted a pattern of understaffing, low morale, and inadequate training at the facility, which OIG officials noted could have affected the staff’s attentiveness and contributed to policy non-compliance. Despite the extensive scrutiny surrounding Epstein, including prior suicide attempts, the OIG noted that prison staff were inadequately briefed on his heightened risk level. This lack of communication, combined with the failure of supervisory staff to enforce accountability, created an environment where critical protocols were ignored. The report concluded that systemic issues within the BOP were likely contributors to the failures in Epstein’s case and recommended measures to improve oversight, ensure policy adherence, and address structural weaknesses in the federal prison system.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>804</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Epstein’s Operation Wasn’t Wholesale — It Was Targeted (Part 3) (7/8/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/epstein-s-operation-wasn-t-wholesale-it-was-targeted-part-3-7-8-26--72861589</link><description><![CDATA[<br />Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking operation was not built like a traditional street-level sex-trafficking ring focused on volume and direct profit. It was a targeted exploitation network designed around access, influence, leverage, and elite protection. Epstein allegedly used vulnerable girls and young women as currency inside a world of wealthy and powerful people, where secrecy and proximity mattered more than ordinary commercial gain. Jean-Luc Brunel and MC2 mattered because the modeling industry allegedly provided the perfect cover: promises of opportunity, travel, housing, introductions, and career advancement that could be used to lure young women into Epstein’s orbit while making the arrangement appear legitimate from the outside.<br /><br />Immigration fraud was central to that machinery because foreign girls and young women could allegedly be brought into the United States under false pretenses, then controlled through fear, dependency, paperwork, and threats tied to their legal status. Once inside the system, the promise of modeling work could turn into coercion, isolation, abuse, and silence, with immigration vulnerability functioning like an invisible leash. The larger indictment is that Epstein’s operation required more than one predator; it required recruiters, facilitators, professional covers, institutional failure, and powerful people willing to look away. Epstein may be dead, and Brunel may be dead, but the machinery they used did not run on ghosts, and until the visa fraud, modeling pipeline, money trail, and protected associates are fully exposed, the coverup remains alive.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72861589</guid><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 20:30:01 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72861589/epsteinsystemofcontrol3.mp3" length="12755740" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/70767ba6-3282-40cb-b46d-c260fe06bcc6/70767ba6-3282-40cb-b46d-c260fe06bcc6.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/70767ba6-3282-40cb-b46d-c260fe06bcc6/70767ba6-3282-40cb-b46d-c260fe06bcc6.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/70767ba6-3282-40cb-b46d-c260fe06bcc6/70767ba6-3282-40cb-b46d-c260fe06bcc6.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking operation was not built like a traditional street-level sex-trafficking ring focused on volume and direct profit. It was a targeted exploitation network designed around access, influence, leverage, and elite protection....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br />Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking operation was not built like a traditional street-level sex-trafficking ring focused on volume and direct profit. It was a targeted exploitation network designed around access, influence, leverage, and elite protection. Epstein allegedly used vulnerable girls and young women as currency inside a world of wealthy and powerful people, where secrecy and proximity mattered more than ordinary commercial gain. Jean-Luc Brunel and MC2 mattered because the modeling industry allegedly provided the perfect cover: promises of opportunity, travel, housing, introductions, and career advancement that could be used to lure young women into Epstein’s orbit while making the arrangement appear legitimate from the outside.<br /><br />Immigration fraud was central to that machinery because foreign girls and young women could allegedly be brought into the United States under false pretenses, then controlled through fear, dependency, paperwork, and threats tied to their legal status. Once inside the system, the promise of modeling work could turn into coercion, isolation, abuse, and silence, with immigration vulnerability functioning like an invisible leash. The larger indictment is that Epstein’s operation required more than one predator; it required recruiters, facilitators, professional covers, institutional failure, and powerful people willing to look away. Epstein may be dead, and Brunel may be dead, but the machinery they used did not run on ghosts, and until the visa fraud, modeling pipeline, money trail, and protected associates are fully exposed, the coverup remains alive.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>798</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Epstein’s Operation Wasn’t Wholesale — It Was Targeted (Part 2) (7/8/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/epstein-s-operation-wasn-t-wholesale-it-was-targeted-part-2-7-8-26--72861590</link><description><![CDATA[<br />Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking operation was not built like a traditional street-level sex-trafficking ring focused on volume and direct profit. It was a targeted exploitation network designed around access, influence, leverage, and elite protection. Epstein allegedly used vulnerable girls and young women as currency inside a world of wealthy and powerful people, where secrecy and proximity mattered more than ordinary commercial gain. Jean-Luc Brunel and MC2 mattered because the modeling industry allegedly provided the perfect cover: promises of opportunity, travel, housing, introductions, and career advancement that could be used to lure young women into Epstein’s orbit while making the arrangement appear legitimate from the outside.<br /><br />Immigration fraud was central to that machinery because foreign girls and young women could allegedly be brought into the United States under false pretenses, then controlled through fear, dependency, paperwork, and threats tied to their legal status. Once inside the system, the promise of modeling work could turn into coercion, isolation, abuse, and silence, with immigration vulnerability functioning like an invisible leash. The larger indictment is that Epstein’s operation required more than one predator; it required recruiters, facilitators, professional covers, institutional failure, and powerful people willing to look away. Epstein may be dead, and Brunel may be dead, but the machinery they used did not run on ghosts, and until the visa fraud, modeling pipeline, money trail, and protected associates are fully exposed, the coverup remains alive.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72861590</guid><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 18:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72861590/epsteinsystemofcontrol2.mp3" length="11274911" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/acaf086f-5572-466e-ba45-df4d6d4f645a/acaf086f-5572-466e-ba45-df4d6d4f645a.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/acaf086f-5572-466e-ba45-df4d6d4f645a/acaf086f-5572-466e-ba45-df4d6d4f645a.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/acaf086f-5572-466e-ba45-df4d6d4f645a/acaf086f-5572-466e-ba45-df4d6d4f645a.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking operation was not built like a traditional street-level sex-trafficking ring focused on volume and direct profit. It was a targeted exploitation network designed around access, influence, leverage, and elite protection....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br />Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking operation was not built like a traditional street-level sex-trafficking ring focused on volume and direct profit. It was a targeted exploitation network designed around access, influence, leverage, and elite protection. Epstein allegedly used vulnerable girls and young women as currency inside a world of wealthy and powerful people, where secrecy and proximity mattered more than ordinary commercial gain. Jean-Luc Brunel and MC2 mattered because the modeling industry allegedly provided the perfect cover: promises of opportunity, travel, housing, introductions, and career advancement that could be used to lure young women into Epstein’s orbit while making the arrangement appear legitimate from the outside.<br /><br />Immigration fraud was central to that machinery because foreign girls and young women could allegedly be brought into the United States under false pretenses, then controlled through fear, dependency, paperwork, and threats tied to their legal status. Once inside the system, the promise of modeling work could turn into coercion, isolation, abuse, and silence, with immigration vulnerability functioning like an invisible leash. The larger indictment is that Epstein’s operation required more than one predator; it required recruiters, facilitators, professional covers, institutional failure, and powerful people willing to look away. Epstein may be dead, and Brunel may be dead, but the machinery they used did not run on ghosts, and until the visa fraud, modeling pipeline, money trail, and protected associates are fully exposed, the coverup remains alive.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>705</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Epstein’s Operation Wasn’t Wholesale — It Was Targeted (Part 1) (7/8/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/epstein-s-operation-wasn-t-wholesale-it-was-targeted-part-1-7-8-26--72861588</link><description><![CDATA[<br />Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking operation was not built like a traditional street-level sex-trafficking ring focused on volume and direct profit. It was a targeted exploitation network designed around access, influence, leverage, and elite protection. Epstein allegedly used vulnerable girls and young women as currency inside a world of wealthy and powerful people, where secrecy and proximity mattered more than ordinary commercial gain. Jean-Luc Brunel and MC2 mattered because the modeling industry allegedly provided the perfect cover: promises of opportunity, travel, housing, introductions, and career advancement that could be used to lure young women into Epstein’s orbit while making the arrangement appear legitimate from the outside.<br /><br />Immigration fraud was central to that machinery because foreign girls and young women could allegedly be brought into the United States under false pretenses, then controlled through fear, dependency, paperwork, and threats tied to their legal status. Once inside the system, the promise of modeling work could turn into coercion, isolation, abuse, and silence, with immigration vulnerability functioning like an invisible leash. The larger indictment is that Epstein’s operation required more than one predator; it required recruiters, facilitators, professional covers, institutional failure, and powerful people willing to look away. Epstein may be dead, and Brunel may be dead, but the machinery they used did not run on ghosts, and until the visa fraud, modeling pipeline, money trail, and protected associates are fully exposed, the coverup remains alive.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72861588</guid><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 16:30:40 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72861588/epsteinsystemofcontrol1.mp3" length="14494450" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a525068d-daa8-4b1f-910c-d13966a05a50/a525068d-daa8-4b1f-910c-d13966a05a50.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a525068d-daa8-4b1f-910c-d13966a05a50/a525068d-daa8-4b1f-910c-d13966a05a50.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a525068d-daa8-4b1f-910c-d13966a05a50/a525068d-daa8-4b1f-910c-d13966a05a50.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking operation was not built like a traditional street-level sex-trafficking ring focused on volume and direct profit. It was a targeted exploitation network designed around access, influence, leverage, and elite protection....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br />Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking operation was not built like a traditional street-level sex-trafficking ring focused on volume and direct profit. It was a targeted exploitation network designed around access, influence, leverage, and elite protection. Epstein allegedly used vulnerable girls and young women as currency inside a world of wealthy and powerful people, where secrecy and proximity mattered more than ordinary commercial gain. Jean-Luc Brunel and MC2 mattered because the modeling industry allegedly provided the perfect cover: promises of opportunity, travel, housing, introductions, and career advancement that could be used to lure young women into Epstein’s orbit while making the arrangement appear legitimate from the outside.<br /><br />Immigration fraud was central to that machinery because foreign girls and young women could allegedly be brought into the United States under false pretenses, then controlled through fear, dependency, paperwork, and threats tied to their legal status. Once inside the system, the promise of modeling work could turn into coercion, isolation, abuse, and silence, with immigration vulnerability functioning like an invisible leash. The larger indictment is that Epstein’s operation required more than one predator; it required recruiters, facilitators, professional covers, institutional failure, and powerful people willing to look away. Epstein may be dead, and Brunel may be dead, but the machinery they used did not run on ghosts, and until the visa fraud, modeling pipeline, money trail, and protected associates are fully exposed, the coverup remains alive.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>906</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Alex Murdaugh Re-Trial:  Becky Hill, SLED, and the Records Prosecutors Now Want Released (7/8/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/alex-murdaugh-re-trial-becky-hill-sled-and-the-records-prosecutors-now-want-released-7-8-26--72861587</link><description><![CDATA[South Carolina prosecutors are now backing the unsealing of major records tied to the Becky Hill jury-tampering fallout in the Alex Murdaugh case, including materials related to the removal of former juror Myra Crosby — the so-called “egg juror” — and investigative files from SLED’s probe into Hill. In a July 6, 2026 filing, the attorney general’s office said the public should be allowed to see the sealed hearings, interview memos, videos, and other materials that shaped the inquiry, but only after juror identities and sensitive information are redacted. That marks a shift from earlier stages of the litigation, when prosecutors resisted disclosure while Murdaugh’s appeal was still pending.<br /><br />The fight now is less about whether the records should come out and more about how they should be released. Prosecutors argue the court repeatedly promised jurors confidentiality and cannot simply abandon that obligation because the case has moved into a new phase or because some jurors have spoken publicly. The files at issue include records from the investigation that ended with Hill pleading guilty to misconduct in office and perjury, though she was not criminally charged with jury tampering. If the court agrees, the public could finally see some of the most important records behind the scandal that blew apart Murdaugh’s murder convictions, while Murdaugh could also potentially use parts of those materials in his federal civil rights lawsuit against Hill.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.fitsnews.com/2026/07/06/murdaugh-saga-prosecutors-support-unsealing-becky-hill-files/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Murdaugh Saga: Prosecutors Support Unsealing Becky Hill Files - FITSNews</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72861587</guid><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 14:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72861587/murdaughprosecutorssupportunsealinghillfiles.mp3" length="10479952" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/432dc284-2ae5-479f-b6c6-28f875211674/432dc284-2ae5-479f-b6c6-28f875211674.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/432dc284-2ae5-479f-b6c6-28f875211674/432dc284-2ae5-479f-b6c6-28f875211674.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/432dc284-2ae5-479f-b6c6-28f875211674/432dc284-2ae5-479f-b6c6-28f875211674.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>South Carolina prosecutors are now backing the unsealing of major records tied to the Becky Hill jury-tampering fallout in the Alex Murdaugh case, including materials related to the removal of former juror Myra Crosby — the so-called “egg juror” — and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[South Carolina prosecutors are now backing the unsealing of major records tied to the Becky Hill jury-tampering fallout in the Alex Murdaugh case, including materials related to the removal of former juror Myra Crosby — the so-called “egg juror” — and investigative files from SLED’s probe into Hill. In a July 6, 2026 filing, the attorney general’s office said the public should be allowed to see the sealed hearings, interview memos, videos, and other materials that shaped the inquiry, but only after juror identities and sensitive information are redacted. That marks a shift from earlier stages of the litigation, when prosecutors resisted disclosure while Murdaugh’s appeal was still pending.<br /><br />The fight now is less about whether the records should come out and more about how they should be released. Prosecutors argue the court repeatedly promised jurors confidentiality and cannot simply abandon that obligation because the case has moved into a new phase or because some jurors have spoken publicly. The files at issue include records from the investigation that ended with Hill pleading guilty to misconduct in office and perjury, though she was not criminally charged with jury tampering. If the court agrees, the public could finally see some of the most important records behind the scandal that blew apart Murdaugh’s murder convictions, while Murdaugh could also potentially use parts of those materials in his federal civil rights lawsuit against Hill.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.fitsnews.com/2026/07/06/murdaugh-saga-prosecutors-support-unsealing-becky-hill-files/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Murdaugh Saga: Prosecutors Support Unsealing Becky Hill Files - FITSNews</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>655</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>alexmurdaugh,breakingnews,breakingnewsreports,breakingnewsupdate,dailynews,dailynewsupdates,murdaugh,murdaughmurders,murdaughtrial,news,newsbreaks,newsbriefs,newscommentary,newsreport,newsupdate,newsupdates,southcarolina,truecrime,yourdailyupdate,yournewsyourworld</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Royal Alibi That a Restaurant Took More Seriously Than Scotland Yard (7/8/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-royal-alibi-that-a-restaurant-took-more-seriously-than-scotland-yard-7-8-26--72861591</link><description><![CDATA[Pizza Express carried out an internal inquiry into Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s infamous claim that he was at its Woking branch on March 10, 2001 — the same date Virginia Giuffre alleged she was sexually abused by him after being trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein. Andrew used the Woking visit during his 2019 BBC Newsnight interview as part of his denial, saying he had taken Princess Beatrice to a children’s party there and remembered it because going to Pizza Express in Woking was an unusual thing for him to do. According to the BBC’s reporting, Pizza Express checked what it could, including records and former staff, but found no evidence proving he had been there — and no evidence definitively proving he had not.<br /><br />BBC Newsnight also revisited the claim and found no record of anyone seeing Andrew at the restaurant that day. The BBC tried to get answers from the Metropolitan Police about whether royal protection officers had accompanied him, but the Met refused to confirm or deny whether it held relevant information, citing national security and protection issues. So the bottom line is brutal: one of Andrew’s most famous Epstein alibis remains unsupported by any clear public evidence, and the most visible attempt to test it appears to have come not from police producing a clean answer, but from Pizza Express itself trying to verify whether the former royal was ever actually in that Woking branch.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c1my27lyjx9o" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Pizza Express held inquiry into Andrew Mountbatten Windsor's Woking claim</a><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72861591</guid><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72861591/wokingpizzainvestigationarticle.mp3" length="11111071" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e53bde0e-f745-4713-8c38-409fdf63c1d0/e53bde0e-f745-4713-8c38-409fdf63c1d0.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e53bde0e-f745-4713-8c38-409fdf63c1d0/e53bde0e-f745-4713-8c38-409fdf63c1d0.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e53bde0e-f745-4713-8c38-409fdf63c1d0/e53bde0e-f745-4713-8c38-409fdf63c1d0.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Pizza Express carried out an internal inquiry into Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s infamous claim that he was at its Woking branch on March 10, 2001 — the same date Virginia Giuffre alleged she was sexually abused by him after being trafficked by Jeffrey...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Pizza Express carried out an internal inquiry into Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s infamous claim that he was at its Woking branch on March 10, 2001 — the same date Virginia Giuffre alleged she was sexually abused by him after being trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein. Andrew used the Woking visit during his 2019 BBC Newsnight interview as part of his denial, saying he had taken Princess Beatrice to a children’s party there and remembered it because going to Pizza Express in Woking was an unusual thing for him to do. According to the BBC’s reporting, Pizza Express checked what it could, including records and former staff, but found no evidence proving he had been there — and no evidence definitively proving he had not.<br /><br />BBC Newsnight also revisited the claim and found no record of anyone seeing Andrew at the restaurant that day. The BBC tried to get answers from the Metropolitan Police about whether royal protection officers had accompanied him, but the Met refused to confirm or deny whether it held relevant information, citing national security and protection issues. So the bottom line is brutal: one of Andrew’s most famous Epstein alibis remains unsupported by any clear public evidence, and the most visible attempt to test it appears to have come not from police producing a clean answer, but from Pizza Express itself trying to verify whether the former royal was ever actually in that Woking branch.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c1my27lyjx9o" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Pizza Express held inquiry into Andrew Mountbatten Windsor's Woking claim</a><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>695</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The OIG Report Detailing The Investigation Into Epstein's NPA (Part 52-54) (7/7/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-oig-report-detailing-the-investigation-into-epstein-s-npa-part-52-54-7-7-26--72846076</link><description><![CDATA[The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein’s high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.<br /><br />Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/opr/page/file/1336471/dl" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">dl (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72846076</guid><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72846076/megaoignpa52n53n54.mp3" length="40813758" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e758e2ef-b0d8-452f-8582-62d14612f9f1/e758e2ef-b0d8-452f-8582-62d14612f9f1.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e758e2ef-b0d8-452f-8582-62d14612f9f1/e758e2ef-b0d8-452f-8582-62d14612f9f1.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e758e2ef-b0d8-452f-8582-62d14612f9f1/e758e2ef-b0d8-452f-8582-62d14612f9f1.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein’s high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.<br /><br />Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/opr/page/file/1336471/dl" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">dl (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2551</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The OIG Report Detailing The Investigation Into Epstein's NPA (Part 48-51)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-oig-report-detailing-the-investigation-into-epstein-s-npa-part-48-51--72846077</link><description><![CDATA[The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein’s high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.<br /><br />Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/opr/page/file/1336471/dl" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">dl (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72846077</guid><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 08:30:09 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72846077/megaoignpa48n49n50n51.mp3" length="47731818" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1f0d9485-3758-4320-a001-a15ac73dcd2a/1f0d9485-3758-4320-a001-a15ac73dcd2a.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1f0d9485-3758-4320-a001-a15ac73dcd2a/1f0d9485-3758-4320-a001-a15ac73dcd2a.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1f0d9485-3758-4320-a001-a15ac73dcd2a/1f0d9485-3758-4320-a001-a15ac73dcd2a.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein’s high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.<br /><br />Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/opr/page/file/1336471/dl" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">dl (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2984</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The OIG Report Detailing The Investigation Into Epstein's NPA (Part 45-47) (7/7/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-oig-report-detailing-the-investigation-into-epstein-s-npa-part-45-47-7-7-26--72846078</link><description><![CDATA[The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein’s high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.<br /><br />Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/opr/page/file/1336471/dl" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">dl (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72846078</guid><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 06:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72846078/megaoignpa45n46n47.mp3" length="38287613" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1515bd9e-fbfa-4bc7-adf8-93677e5d92b8/1515bd9e-fbfa-4bc7-adf8-93677e5d92b8.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1515bd9e-fbfa-4bc7-adf8-93677e5d92b8/1515bd9e-fbfa-4bc7-adf8-93677e5d92b8.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1515bd9e-fbfa-4bc7-adf8-93677e5d92b8/1515bd9e-fbfa-4bc7-adf8-93677e5d92b8.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein’s high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.<br /><br />Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/opr/page/file/1336471/dl" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">dl (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2393</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The OIG Report Into Jeffrey Epstein's Death: Conclusions And Recommendations (Chapter 7) (Part 2)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-oig-report-into-jeffrey-epstein-s-death-conclusions-and-recommendations-chapter-7-part-2--72805688</link><description><![CDATA[The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report on Jeffrey Epstein's death in federal custody revealed severe lapses in protocol, negligence, and misconduct by Bureau of Prisons (BOP) staff at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York. Epstein, who was awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges, died of apparent suicide on August 10, 2019. The report found that staff failed to conduct regular 30-minute checks on Epstein’s cell, as required, and that surveillance cameras in his unit were either inoperative or not monitored adequately. The night of Epstein's death, officers on duty had fallen asleep or were otherwise occupied, leaving him unsupervised for hours, which the OIG noted as a direct violation of BOP policies. These failures contributed to the conditions that allowed Epstein the opportunity to take his own life.<br /><br />The report also highlighted a pattern of understaffing, low morale, and inadequate training at the facility, which OIG officials noted could have affected the staff’s attentiveness and contributed to policy non-compliance. Despite the extensive scrutiny surrounding Epstein, including prior suicide attempts, the OIG noted that prison staff were inadequately briefed on his heightened risk level. This lack of communication, combined with the failure of supervisory staff to enforce accountability, created an environment where critical protocols were ignored. The report concluded that systemic issues within the BOP were likely contributors to the failures in Epstein’s case and recommended measures to improve oversight, ensure policy adherence, and address structural weaknesses in the federal prison system.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)</a><br />show less<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72805688</guid><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72805688/epsteinoigchapter7prt2.mp3" length="14756511" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a9a3d794-9d26-4166-b270-06d06a3622af/a9a3d794-9d26-4166-b270-06d06a3622af.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a9a3d794-9d26-4166-b270-06d06a3622af/a9a3d794-9d26-4166-b270-06d06a3622af.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a9a3d794-9d26-4166-b270-06d06a3622af/a9a3d794-9d26-4166-b270-06d06a3622af.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report on Jeffrey Epstein's death in federal custody revealed severe lapses in protocol, negligence, and misconduct by Bureau of Prisons (BOP) staff at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report on Jeffrey Epstein's death in federal custody revealed severe lapses in protocol, negligence, and misconduct by Bureau of Prisons (BOP) staff at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York. Epstein, who was awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges, died of apparent suicide on August 10, 2019. The report found that staff failed to conduct regular 30-minute checks on Epstein’s cell, as required, and that surveillance cameras in his unit were either inoperative or not monitored adequately. The night of Epstein's death, officers on duty had fallen asleep or were otherwise occupied, leaving him unsupervised for hours, which the OIG noted as a direct violation of BOP policies. These failures contributed to the conditions that allowed Epstein the opportunity to take his own life.<br /><br />The report also highlighted a pattern of understaffing, low morale, and inadequate training at the facility, which OIG officials noted could have affected the staff’s attentiveness and contributed to policy non-compliance. Despite the extensive scrutiny surrounding Epstein, including prior suicide attempts, the OIG noted that prison staff were inadequately briefed on his heightened risk level. This lack of communication, combined with the failure of supervisory staff to enforce accountability, created an environment where critical protocols were ignored. The report concluded that systemic issues within the BOP were likely contributors to the failures in Epstein’s case and recommended measures to improve oversight, ensure policy adherence, and address structural weaknesses in the federal prison system.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)</a><br />show less<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>923</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The OIG Report Into Jeffrey Epstein's Death: Conclusions And Recommendations (Chapter 7) (Part 1)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-oig-report-into-jeffrey-epstein-s-death-conclusions-and-recommendations-chapter-7-part-1--72805684</link><description><![CDATA[The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report on Jeffrey Epstein's death in federal custody revealed severe lapses in protocol, negligence, and misconduct by Bureau of Prisons (BOP) staff at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York. Epstein, who was awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges, died of apparent suicide on August 10, 2019. The report found that staff failed to conduct regular 30-minute checks on Epstein’s cell, as required, and that surveillance cameras in his unit were either inoperative or not monitored adequately. The night of Epstein's death, officers on duty had fallen asleep or were otherwise occupied, leaving him unsupervised for hours, which the OIG noted as a direct violation of BOP policies. These failures contributed to the conditions that allowed Epstein the opportunity to take his own life.<br /><br />The report also highlighted a pattern of understaffing, low morale, and inadequate training at the facility, which OIG officials noted could have affected the staff’s attentiveness and contributed to policy non-compliance. Despite the extensive scrutiny surrounding Epstein, including prior suicide attempts, the OIG noted that prison staff were inadequately briefed on his heightened risk level. This lack of communication, combined with the failure of supervisory staff to enforce accountability, created an environment where critical protocols were ignored. The report concluded that systemic issues within the BOP were likely contributors to the failures in Epstein’s case and recommended measures to improve oversight, ensure policy adherence, and address structural weaknesses in the federal prison system.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)</a><br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72805684</guid><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72805684/epsteinoigchapter7prt1.mp3" length="16872220" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5ed0dd74-2e9b-41ab-98fa-fad9e0217fd6/5ed0dd74-2e9b-41ab-98fa-fad9e0217fd6.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5ed0dd74-2e9b-41ab-98fa-fad9e0217fd6/5ed0dd74-2e9b-41ab-98fa-fad9e0217fd6.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5ed0dd74-2e9b-41ab-98fa-fad9e0217fd6/5ed0dd74-2e9b-41ab-98fa-fad9e0217fd6.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report on Jeffrey Epstein's death in federal custody revealed severe lapses in protocol, negligence, and misconduct by Bureau of Prisons (BOP) staff at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report on Jeffrey Epstein's death in federal custody revealed severe lapses in protocol, negligence, and misconduct by Bureau of Prisons (BOP) staff at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York. Epstein, who was awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges, died of apparent suicide on August 10, 2019. The report found that staff failed to conduct regular 30-minute checks on Epstein’s cell, as required, and that surveillance cameras in his unit were either inoperative or not monitored adequately. The night of Epstein's death, officers on duty had fallen asleep or were otherwise occupied, leaving him unsupervised for hours, which the OIG noted as a direct violation of BOP policies. These failures contributed to the conditions that allowed Epstein the opportunity to take his own life.<br /><br />The report also highlighted a pattern of understaffing, low morale, and inadequate training at the facility, which OIG officials noted could have affected the staff’s attentiveness and contributed to policy non-compliance. Despite the extensive scrutiny surrounding Epstein, including prior suicide attempts, the OIG noted that prison staff were inadequately briefed on his heightened risk level. This lack of communication, combined with the failure of supervisory staff to enforce accountability, created an environment where critical protocols were ignored. The report concluded that systemic issues within the BOP were likely contributors to the failures in Epstein’s case and recommended measures to improve oversight, ensure policy adherence, and address structural weaknesses in the federal prison system.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)</a><br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1055</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The OIG Report Into Jeffrey Epstein's Death: Background On Security Cameras (Chapter 6) (Part 2)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-oig-report-into-jeffrey-epstein-s-death-background-on-security-cameras-chapter-6-part-2--72805693</link><description><![CDATA[The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report on Jeffrey Epstein's death in federal custody revealed severe lapses in protocol, negligence, and misconduct by Bureau of Prisons (BOP) staff at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York. Epstein, who was awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges, died of apparent suicide on August 10, 2019. The report found that staff failed to conduct regular 30-minute checks on Epstein’s cell, as required, and that surveillance cameras in his unit were either inoperative or not monitored adequately. The night of Epstein's death, officers on duty had fallen asleep or were otherwise occupied, leaving him unsupervised for hours, which the OIG noted as a direct violation of BOP policies. These failures contributed to the conditions that allowed Epstein the opportunity to take his own life.<br /><br />The report also highlighted a pattern of understaffing, low morale, and inadequate training at the facility, which OIG officials noted could have affected the staff’s attentiveness and contributed to policy non-compliance. Despite the extensive scrutiny surrounding Epstein, including prior suicide attempts, the OIG noted that prison staff were inadequately briefed on his heightened risk level. This lack of communication, combined with the failure of supervisory staff to enforce accountability, created an environment where critical protocols were ignored. The report concluded that systemic issues within the BOP were likely contributors to the failures in Epstein’s case and recommended measures to improve oversight, ensure policy adherence, and address structural weaknesses in the federal prison system.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72805693</guid><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72805693/epsteinoigchapter6prt2.mp3" length="14435100" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5b8acfce-d060-45f9-817a-d5da68a9ba76/5b8acfce-d060-45f9-817a-d5da68a9ba76.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5b8acfce-d060-45f9-817a-d5da68a9ba76/5b8acfce-d060-45f9-817a-d5da68a9ba76.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5b8acfce-d060-45f9-817a-d5da68a9ba76/5b8acfce-d060-45f9-817a-d5da68a9ba76.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report on Jeffrey Epstein's death in federal custody revealed severe lapses in protocol, negligence, and misconduct by Bureau of Prisons (BOP) staff at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report on Jeffrey Epstein's death in federal custody revealed severe lapses in protocol, negligence, and misconduct by Bureau of Prisons (BOP) staff at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York. Epstein, who was awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges, died of apparent suicide on August 10, 2019. The report found that staff failed to conduct regular 30-minute checks on Epstein’s cell, as required, and that surveillance cameras in his unit were either inoperative or not monitored adequately. The night of Epstein's death, officers on duty had fallen asleep or were otherwise occupied, leaving him unsupervised for hours, which the OIG noted as a direct violation of BOP policies. These failures contributed to the conditions that allowed Epstein the opportunity to take his own life.<br /><br />The report also highlighted a pattern of understaffing, low morale, and inadequate training at the facility, which OIG officials noted could have affected the staff’s attentiveness and contributed to policy non-compliance. Despite the extensive scrutiny surrounding Epstein, including prior suicide attempts, the OIG noted that prison staff were inadequately briefed on his heightened risk level. This lack of communication, combined with the failure of supervisory staff to enforce accountability, created an environment where critical protocols were ignored. The report concluded that systemic issues within the BOP were likely contributors to the failures in Epstein’s case and recommended measures to improve oversight, ensure policy adherence, and address structural weaknesses in the federal prison system.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>903</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The OIG Report Into Jeffrey Epstein's Death: Background On Security Cameras (Chapter 6) (Part 1)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-oig-report-into-jeffrey-epstein-s-death-background-on-security-cameras-chapter-6-part-1--72805696</link><description><![CDATA[The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report on Jeffrey Epstein's death in federal custody revealed severe lapses in protocol, negligence, and misconduct by Bureau of Prisons (BOP) staff at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York. Epstein, who was awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges, died of apparent suicide on August 10, 2019. The report found that staff failed to conduct regular 30-minute checks on Epstein’s cell, as required, and that surveillance cameras in his unit were either inoperative or not monitored adequately. The night of Epstein's death, officers on duty had fallen asleep or were otherwise occupied, leaving him unsupervised for hours, which the OIG noted as a direct violation of BOP policies. These failures contributed to the conditions that allowed Epstein the opportunity to take his own life.<br /><br />The report also highlighted a pattern of understaffing, low morale, and inadequate training at the facility, which OIG officials noted could have affected the staff’s attentiveness and contributed to policy non-compliance. Despite the extensive scrutiny surrounding Epstein, including prior suicide attempts, the OIG noted that prison staff were inadequately briefed on his heightened risk level. This lack of communication, combined with the failure of supervisory staff to enforce accountability, created an environment where critical protocols were ignored. The report concluded that systemic issues within the BOP were likely contributors to the failures in Epstein’s case and recommended measures to improve oversight, ensure policy adherence, and address structural weaknesses in the federal prison system.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72805696</guid><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72805696/epsteinoigchapter6prt1.mp3" length="10478280" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/51ef3d5c-8077-4a26-93f4-679ae572e6b4/51ef3d5c-8077-4a26-93f4-679ae572e6b4.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/51ef3d5c-8077-4a26-93f4-679ae572e6b4/51ef3d5c-8077-4a26-93f4-679ae572e6b4.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/51ef3d5c-8077-4a26-93f4-679ae572e6b4/51ef3d5c-8077-4a26-93f4-679ae572e6b4.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report on Jeffrey Epstein's death in federal custody revealed severe lapses in protocol, negligence, and misconduct by Bureau of Prisons (BOP) staff at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report on Jeffrey Epstein's death in federal custody revealed severe lapses in protocol, negligence, and misconduct by Bureau of Prisons (BOP) staff at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York. Epstein, who was awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges, died of apparent suicide on August 10, 2019. The report found that staff failed to conduct regular 30-minute checks on Epstein’s cell, as required, and that surveillance cameras in his unit were either inoperative or not monitored adequately. The night of Epstein's death, officers on duty had fallen asleep or were otherwise occupied, leaving him unsupervised for hours, which the OIG noted as a direct violation of BOP policies. These failures contributed to the conditions that allowed Epstein the opportunity to take his own life.<br /><br />The report also highlighted a pattern of understaffing, low morale, and inadequate training at the facility, which OIG officials noted could have affected the staff’s attentiveness and contributed to policy non-compliance. Despite the extensive scrutiny surrounding Epstein, including prior suicide attempts, the OIG noted that prison staff were inadequately briefed on his heightened risk level. This lack of communication, combined with the failure of supervisory staff to enforce accountability, created an environment where critical protocols were ignored. The report concluded that systemic issues within the BOP were likely contributors to the failures in Epstein’s case and recommended measures to improve oversight, ensure policy adherence, and address structural weaknesses in the federal prison system.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>655</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Lesley Groff And The Transcript From Her Epstein Related Trip to Congress (Part 4) (7/7/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/lesley-groff-and-the-transcript-from-her-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-4-7-7-26--72855087</link><description><![CDATA[Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her central position was that Epstein kept her separated from his criminal life, that she never witnessed abuse, never had a victim disclose abuse to her, and did not knowingly help Epstein or Maxwell commit crimes. She described Epstein as a “master manipulator” who lied to her and kept his “legitimate” world apart from his abuse, while acknowledging that she scheduled massage appointments when Epstein provided names and numbers, sometimes circulated calendars that included those appointments early on, and understood the massages as routine at the time. She said she did not personally meet the massage providers, did not know they were minors or young women, and assumed they were masseuses, even though members pressed her on why an extremely wealthy man would use rotating names and phone numbers instead of a professional massage service.<br /><br />The questioning also focused heavily on Epstein’s network and whether Groff had knowledge of powerful men being provided access to girls or young women through Epstein or Maxwell. Groff repeatedly answered no when asked whether she had arranged massages for prominent figures, knew of sexual activity involving minors or young women, or knew of anyone who knowingly facilitated Epstein’s crimes. She acknowledged scheduling or connecting Epstein with high-profile contacts, including Prince Andrew, Ehud Barak, Larry Summers, George Mitchell, John Kerry, Wesley Clark, Bill Clinton-related circles, and Donald Trump phone calls, but denied arranging Trump travel during her employment and denied knowledge of Trump-related law enforcement communications. She also said she never suspected Epstein or Maxwell of working with any intelligence service. Overall, Groff’s testimony was defensive and narrow: she admitted to being part of the machinery that kept Epstein’s calendar and contacts moving, but insisted she never saw the criminal operation underneath it and never knowingly enabled it.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:  <br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72855087</guid><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 20:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72855087/grofftranscript4.mp3" length="13103482" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2f915a47-bdbc-4d88-904b-8a2c789b3a1f/2f915a47-bdbc-4d88-904b-8a2c789b3a1f.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2f915a47-bdbc-4d88-904b-8a2c789b3a1f/2f915a47-bdbc-4d88-904b-8a2c789b3a1f.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2f915a47-bdbc-4d88-904b-8a2c789b3a1f/2f915a47-bdbc-4d88-904b-8a2c789b3a1f.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her central position was that Epstein kept her separated from his criminal life, that she never witnessed abuse, never had a victim disclose abuse to her, and did not knowingly help Epstein or Maxwell commit crimes. She described Epstein as a “master manipulator” who lied to her and kept his “legitimate” world apart from his abuse, while acknowledging that she scheduled massage appointments when Epstein provided names and numbers, sometimes circulated calendars that included those appointments early on, and understood the massages as routine at the time. She said she did not personally meet the massage providers, did not know they were minors or young women, and assumed they were masseuses, even though members pressed her on why an extremely wealthy man would use rotating names and phone numbers instead of a professional massage service.<br /><br />The questioning also focused heavily on Epstein’s network and whether Groff had knowledge of powerful men being provided access to girls or young women through Epstein or Maxwell. Groff repeatedly answered no when asked whether she had arranged massages for prominent figures, knew of sexual activity involving minors or young women, or knew of anyone who knowingly facilitated Epstein’s crimes. She acknowledged scheduling or connecting Epstein with high-profile contacts, including Prince Andrew, Ehud Barak, Larry Summers, George Mitchell, John Kerry, Wesley Clark, Bill Clinton-related circles, and Donald Trump phone calls, but denied arranging Trump travel during her employment and denied knowledge of Trump-related law enforcement communications. She also said she never suspected Epstein or Maxwell of working with any intelligence service. Overall, Groff’s testimony was defensive and narrow: she admitted to being part of the machinery that kept Epstein’s calendar and contacts moving, but insisted she never saw the criminal operation underneath it and never knowingly enabled it.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:  <br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>819</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Alex Murdaugh Re-Trial:  A New Judge, A New Trial, And A Strict New Schedule (7/7/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/alex-murdaugh-re-trial-a-new-judge-a-new-trial-and-a-strict-new-schedule-7-7-26--72855054</link><description><![CDATA[Alex Murdaugh’s murder case is back in motion after his convictions were overturned because of jury-tampering fallout involving the former Colleton County clerk of court, and the new judge, Debra McCaslin, has made it clear that she does not intend to let the retrial drag or drift. The retrial is scheduled to begin on April 5, 2027, and McCaslin is being described as firmly in control of the courtroom, with little patience for unnecessary delays or excuses. The case will once again revisit the killings of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh at the family’s hunting estate in June 2021, with prosecutors expected to return to the core theory that Murdaugh murdered his wife and son as his financial crimes were closing in around him. Murdaugh continues to maintain his innocence, while his defense team argues someone else committed the murders and that the original investigation was flawed.<br /><br />The retrial is also shaping up to be different from the first trial because the defense is expected to push new evidence, new forensic testing, and renewed attacks on the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division’s handling of the crime scene. Anne Emerson, who covered the original trial and now hosts a true-crime podcast, said defense attorney Dick Harpootlian indicated there is new evidence the defense wants to present, including a major focus on DNA recovered from beneath Maggie Murdaugh’s fingernails. The defense wants that material tested with newer forensic technology that was not available when the killings happened in 2021, hoping it could support a third-party suspect argument. At the same time, questions about whether the crime scene was clean, staged, altered, or poorly processed are expected to become another major battleground, giving the defense a path to attack the state’s case while prosecutors try to preserve the circumstantial evidence that originally convinced a jury to convict Murdaugh.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://kfoxtv.com/news/nation-world/new-judge-vows-strict-schedule-as-murdaugh-case-returns-amid-jury-tampering-fallout-alex-murdaugh-family-estate-colleton-county-clerk-south-carolina-murder-killings-criminally-obsessed-guilty-new-trial-anne-emerson-wife-son" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">New judge vows strict schedule as Murdaugh case returns amid jury tampering fallout</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72855054</guid><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 18:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72855054/murdaughjudgestrictschedule.mp3" length="11269895" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1a37623c-435c-4d66-b1b0-1a8c8fa677a2/1a37623c-435c-4d66-b1b0-1a8c8fa677a2.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1a37623c-435c-4d66-b1b0-1a8c8fa677a2/1a37623c-435c-4d66-b1b0-1a8c8fa677a2.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1a37623c-435c-4d66-b1b0-1a8c8fa677a2/1a37623c-435c-4d66-b1b0-1a8c8fa677a2.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Alex Murdaugh’s murder case is back in motion after his convictions were overturned because of jury-tampering fallout involving the former Colleton County clerk of court, and the new judge, Debra McCaslin, has made it clear that she does not intend to...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Alex Murdaugh’s murder case is back in motion after his convictions were overturned because of jury-tampering fallout involving the former Colleton County clerk of court, and the new judge, Debra McCaslin, has made it clear that she does not intend to let the retrial drag or drift. The retrial is scheduled to begin on April 5, 2027, and McCaslin is being described as firmly in control of the courtroom, with little patience for unnecessary delays or excuses. The case will once again revisit the killings of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh at the family’s hunting estate in June 2021, with prosecutors expected to return to the core theory that Murdaugh murdered his wife and son as his financial crimes were closing in around him. Murdaugh continues to maintain his innocence, while his defense team argues someone else committed the murders and that the original investigation was flawed.<br /><br />The retrial is also shaping up to be different from the first trial because the defense is expected to push new evidence, new forensic testing, and renewed attacks on the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division’s handling of the crime scene. Anne Emerson, who covered the original trial and now hosts a true-crime podcast, said defense attorney Dick Harpootlian indicated there is new evidence the defense wants to present, including a major focus on DNA recovered from beneath Maggie Murdaugh’s fingernails. The defense wants that material tested with newer forensic technology that was not available when the killings happened in 2021, hoping it could support a third-party suspect argument. At the same time, questions about whether the crime scene was clean, staged, altered, or poorly processed are expected to become another major battleground, giving the defense a path to attack the state’s case while prosecutors try to preserve the circumstantial evidence that originally convinced a jury to convict Murdaugh.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://kfoxtv.com/news/nation-world/new-judge-vows-strict-schedule-as-murdaugh-case-returns-amid-jury-tampering-fallout-alex-murdaugh-family-estate-colleton-county-clerk-south-carolina-murder-killings-criminally-obsessed-guilty-new-trial-anne-emerson-wife-son" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">New judge vows strict schedule as Murdaugh case returns amid jury tampering fallout</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>705</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>alexmurdaugh,breakingnews,breakingnewsreports,breakingnewsupdate,dailynews,dailynewsupdates,murdaugh,murdaughmurders,murdaughtrial,news,newsbreaks,newsbriefs,newscommentary,newsreport,newsupdate,newsupdates,southcarolina,truecrime,yourdailyupdate,yournewsyourworld</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Epstein’s Offshore Bank: The Mystery of Southern Country International (7/7/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/epstein-s-offshore-bank-the-mystery-of-southern-country-international-7-7-26--72852449</link><description><![CDATA[The Miami Herald reports that Jeffrey Epstein’s obscure U.S. Virgin Islands offshore bank, Southern Country International, suddenly became active in 2019 after years of dormancy, moving tens of millions of dollars shortly before and after his arrest and death. The bank reportedly had no employees, held under $500,000 for years, and then processed more than $20 million between April and early July 2019. After Epstein died in federal custody on August 10, 2019, another $25 million moved through the bank, including funds from unknown sources. Investigators later examined a $15 million transfer from Epstein’s Deutsche Bank account to Southern Country the day after his death, but the FBI closed the wire-fraud probe four years later without publicly explaining why.<br /><br />The story also lays out how Epstein obtained the offshore banking license in the first place, despite being a registered sex offender, and how Virgin Islands officials gave the bank unusual treatment, including waiving a requirement that it employ at least three people. The Herald notes that the bank may have been used in ways that violated territorial rules, because Southern Country was supposed to do business only with non-Virgin Islands people or companies, yet large transfers involved Epstein’s Southern Trust Company, which was based in the territory. Compliance officers at traditional banks later flagged suspicious activity, with TD Bank reportedly saying some account funding appeared designed to disguise Epstein as the source of the money. The result is another unanswered Epstein money trail: a bank created in a friendly offshore jurisdiction, largely dormant for years, suddenly moving huge sums around the exact moment the walls were closing in.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/article316338915.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Questions surround Epstein’s USVI offshore bank activity | Miami Herald</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72852449</guid><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72852449/epsteinbankcamealivemiamiherald.mp3" length="18226826" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a2683aca-556f-4bc2-9a5e-183c3b706093/a2683aca-556f-4bc2-9a5e-183c3b706093.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a2683aca-556f-4bc2-9a5e-183c3b706093/a2683aca-556f-4bc2-9a5e-183c3b706093.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a2683aca-556f-4bc2-9a5e-183c3b706093/a2683aca-556f-4bc2-9a5e-183c3b706093.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Miami Herald reports that Jeffrey Epstein’s obscure U.S. Virgin Islands offshore bank, Southern Country International, suddenly became active in 2019 after years of dormancy, moving tens of millions of dollars shortly before and after his arrest...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Miami Herald reports that Jeffrey Epstein’s obscure U.S. Virgin Islands offshore bank, Southern Country International, suddenly became active in 2019 after years of dormancy, moving tens of millions of dollars shortly before and after his arrest and death. The bank reportedly had no employees, held under $500,000 for years, and then processed more than $20 million between April and early July 2019. After Epstein died in federal custody on August 10, 2019, another $25 million moved through the bank, including funds from unknown sources. Investigators later examined a $15 million transfer from Epstein’s Deutsche Bank account to Southern Country the day after his death, but the FBI closed the wire-fraud probe four years later without publicly explaining why.<br /><br />The story also lays out how Epstein obtained the offshore banking license in the first place, despite being a registered sex offender, and how Virgin Islands officials gave the bank unusual treatment, including waiving a requirement that it employ at least three people. The Herald notes that the bank may have been used in ways that violated territorial rules, because Southern Country was supposed to do business only with non-Virgin Islands people or companies, yet large transfers involved Epstein’s Southern Trust Company, which was based in the territory. Compliance officers at traditional banks later flagged suspicious activity, with TD Bank reportedly saying some account funding appeared designed to disguise Epstein as the source of the money. The result is another unanswered Epstein money trail: a bank created in a friendly offshore jurisdiction, largely dormant for years, suddenly moving huge sums around the exact moment the walls were closing in.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/article316338915.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Questions surround Epstein’s USVI offshore bank activity | Miami Herald</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1140</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Another Epstein Court Order, Another DOJ Compliance Failure (Part 2) (7/7/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/another-epstein-court-order-another-doj-compliance-failure-part-2-7-7-26--72852447</link><description><![CDATA[<br />The DOJ, under Todd Blanche and Donald Trump, is once again accused of treating an Epstein-related court order as optional, this time in connection with Judge Emmet Sullivan’s order in Katie Phang’s lawsuit seeking Epstein-related documents from the government. Sullivan made clear that DOJ needed to produce less-redacted material or justify the continued withholding, but instead of straightforward compliance, the department has leaned into delay, resistance, and procedural maneuvering. The central criticism is that this is not an isolated paperwork dispute, but another example of the DOJ’s long-running pattern in the Epstein matter: hiding behind redactions, process, victim-protection language, and vague claims of sensitivity while refusing to provide the public with the full accounting Congress, the courts, survivors, and citizens have demanded.<br /><br />The broader point is that the Epstein case has become a test of whether powerful institutions are actually bound by the law they enforce on everyone else. If a regular citizen ignored a court order, consequences would come quickly, but when DOJ slow-walks or resists disclosure, it is treated as a legal disagreement rather than defiance. The essay argues that Judge Sullivan, Congress, the courts, and the OIG must stop accepting excuses and start imposing real consequences, whether through contempt, sanctions, sworn explanations, redaction logs, subpoenas, or independent review. Until someone with authority finally steps up and forces compliance, the DOJ will continue to manage the Epstein narrative, protect institutional reputations, and deny survivors and the public the transparency they were promised.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72852447</guid><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 15:19:55 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72852447/dojrefuesorder2.mp3" length="12963884" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/30298d5b-537e-4dfa-add1-d1a790e17ee3/30298d5b-537e-4dfa-add1-d1a790e17ee3.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/30298d5b-537e-4dfa-add1-d1a790e17ee3/30298d5b-537e-4dfa-add1-d1a790e17ee3.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/30298d5b-537e-4dfa-add1-d1a790e17ee3/30298d5b-537e-4dfa-add1-d1a790e17ee3.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The DOJ, under Todd Blanche and Donald Trump, is once again accused of treating an Epstein-related court order as optional, this time in connection with Judge Emmet Sullivan’s order in Katie Phang’s lawsuit seeking Epstein-related documents from the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br />The DOJ, under Todd Blanche and Donald Trump, is once again accused of treating an Epstein-related court order as optional, this time in connection with Judge Emmet Sullivan’s order in Katie Phang’s lawsuit seeking Epstein-related documents from the government. Sullivan made clear that DOJ needed to produce less-redacted material or justify the continued withholding, but instead of straightforward compliance, the department has leaned into delay, resistance, and procedural maneuvering. The central criticism is that this is not an isolated paperwork dispute, but another example of the DOJ’s long-running pattern in the Epstein matter: hiding behind redactions, process, victim-protection language, and vague claims of sensitivity while refusing to provide the public with the full accounting Congress, the courts, survivors, and citizens have demanded.<br /><br />The broader point is that the Epstein case has become a test of whether powerful institutions are actually bound by the law they enforce on everyone else. If a regular citizen ignored a court order, consequences would come quickly, but when DOJ slow-walks or resists disclosure, it is treated as a legal disagreement rather than defiance. The essay argues that Judge Sullivan, Congress, the courts, and the OIG must stop accepting excuses and start imposing real consequences, whether through contempt, sanctions, sworn explanations, redaction logs, subpoenas, or independent review. Until someone with authority finally steps up and forces compliance, the DOJ will continue to manage the Epstein narrative, protect institutional reputations, and deny survivors and the public the transparency they were promised.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>811</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Another Epstein Court Order, Another DOJ Compliance Failure (Part 1) (7/7/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/another-epstein-court-order-another-doj-compliance-failure-part-1-7-7-26--72852448</link><description><![CDATA[<br />The DOJ, under Todd Blanche and Donald Trump, is once again accused of treating an Epstein-related court order as optional, this time in connection with Judge Emmet Sullivan’s order in Katie Phang’s lawsuit seeking Epstein-related documents from the government. Sullivan made clear that DOJ needed to produce less-redacted material or justify the continued withholding, but instead of straightforward compliance, the department has leaned into delay, resistance, and procedural maneuvering. The central criticism is that this is not an isolated paperwork dispute, but another example of the DOJ’s long-running pattern in the Epstein matter: hiding behind redactions, process, victim-protection language, and vague claims of sensitivity while refusing to provide the public with the full accounting Congress, the courts, survivors, and citizens have demanded.<br /><br />The broader point is that the Epstein case has become a test of whether powerful institutions are actually bound by the law they enforce on everyone else. If a regular citizen ignored a court order, consequences would come quickly, but when DOJ slow-walks or resists disclosure, it is treated as a legal disagreement rather than defiance. The essay argues that Judge Sullivan, Congress, the courts, and the OIG must stop accepting excuses and start imposing real consequences, whether through contempt, sanctions, sworn explanations, redaction logs, subpoenas, or independent review. Until someone with authority finally steps up and forces compliance, the DOJ will continue to manage the Epstein narrative, protect institutional reputations, and deny survivors and the public the transparency they were promised.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72852448</guid><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 12:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72852448/dojrefusesorder1.mp3" length="11933196" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/222a50fa-547d-48d1-a59f-1b88ce407807/222a50fa-547d-48d1-a59f-1b88ce407807.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/222a50fa-547d-48d1-a59f-1b88ce407807/222a50fa-547d-48d1-a59f-1b88ce407807.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/222a50fa-547d-48d1-a59f-1b88ce407807/222a50fa-547d-48d1-a59f-1b88ce407807.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The DOJ, under Todd Blanche and Donald Trump, is once again accused of treating an Epstein-related court order as optional, this time in connection with Judge Emmet Sullivan’s order in Katie Phang’s lawsuit seeking Epstein-related documents from the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br />The DOJ, under Todd Blanche and Donald Trump, is once again accused of treating an Epstein-related court order as optional, this time in connection with Judge Emmet Sullivan’s order in Katie Phang’s lawsuit seeking Epstein-related documents from the government. Sullivan made clear that DOJ needed to produce less-redacted material or justify the continued withholding, but instead of straightforward compliance, the department has leaned into delay, resistance, and procedural maneuvering. The central criticism is that this is not an isolated paperwork dispute, but another example of the DOJ’s long-running pattern in the Epstein matter: hiding behind redactions, process, victim-protection language, and vague claims of sensitivity while refusing to provide the public with the full accounting Congress, the courts, survivors, and citizens have demanded.<br /><br />The broader point is that the Epstein case has become a test of whether powerful institutions are actually bound by the law they enforce on everyone else. If a regular citizen ignored a court order, consequences would come quickly, but when DOJ slow-walks or resists disclosure, it is treated as a legal disagreement rather than defiance. The essay argues that Judge Sullivan, Congress, the courts, and the OIG must stop accepting excuses and start imposing real consequences, whether through contempt, sanctions, sworn explanations, redaction logs, subpoenas, or independent review. Until someone with authority finally steps up and forces compliance, the DOJ will continue to manage the Epstein narrative, protect institutional reputations, and deny survivors and the public the transparency they were promised.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>746</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The OIG Report Detailing The Investigation Into Epstein's NPA (Part 41-44) (7/7/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-oig-report-detailing-the-investigation-into-epstein-s-npa-part-41-44-7-7-26--72840809</link><description><![CDATA[The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein’s high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.<br /><br />Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/opr/page/file/1336471/dl" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">dl (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72840809</guid><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72840809/meganpaoig41n42n43n44.mp3" length="43501235" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/305f7f14-21f3-412e-845e-a368f99411a9/305f7f14-21f3-412e-845e-a368f99411a9.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/305f7f14-21f3-412e-845e-a368f99411a9/305f7f14-21f3-412e-845e-a368f99411a9.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/305f7f14-21f3-412e-845e-a368f99411a9/305f7f14-21f3-412e-845e-a368f99411a9.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein’s high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.<br /><br />Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/opr/page/file/1336471/dl" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">dl (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2719</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The OIG Report Detailing The Investigation Into Epstein's NPA (Part 38-40) (7/6/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-oig-report-detailing-the-investigation-into-epstein-s-npa-part-38-40-7-6-26--72840810</link><description><![CDATA[The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein’s high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.<br /><br />Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/opr/page/file/1336471/dl" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">dl (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72840810</guid><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72840810/megaoignpa38n39n40.mp3" length="43607397" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/296e2f49-4b52-4a5c-9149-ad8a869ba554/296e2f49-4b52-4a5c-9149-ad8a869ba554.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/296e2f49-4b52-4a5c-9149-ad8a869ba554/296e2f49-4b52-4a5c-9149-ad8a869ba554.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/296e2f49-4b52-4a5c-9149-ad8a869ba554/296e2f49-4b52-4a5c-9149-ad8a869ba554.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein’s high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.<br /><br />Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/opr/page/file/1336471/dl" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">dl (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2726</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The OIG Report Detailing The Investigation Into Epstein's NPA (Part 34-37) (7/7/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-oig-report-detailing-the-investigation-into-epstein-s-npa-part-34-37-7-7-26--72840811</link><description><![CDATA[The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein’s high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.<br /><br />Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/opr/page/file/1336471/dl" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">dl (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72840811</guid><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72840811/megaoignpa35n36n37.mp3" length="47737252" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/216766ea-9677-4b35-a5d0-4d16a5ec59c8/216766ea-9677-4b35-a5d0-4d16a5ec59c8.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/216766ea-9677-4b35-a5d0-4d16a5ec59c8/216766ea-9677-4b35-a5d0-4d16a5ec59c8.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/216766ea-9677-4b35-a5d0-4d16a5ec59c8/216766ea-9677-4b35-a5d0-4d16a5ec59c8.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein’s high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.<br /><br />Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/opr/page/file/1336471/dl" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">dl (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2984</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The OIG Report Into Jeffrey Epstein's Death: The Events Of August 8-10 And Epstein's Death (Chapter 5)( Part 4)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-oig-report-into-jeffrey-epstein-s-death-the-events-of-august-8-10-and-epstein-s-death-chapter-5-part-4--72805691</link><description><![CDATA[The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report on Jeffrey Epstein's death in federal custody revealed severe lapses in protocol, negligence, and misconduct by Bureau of Prisons (BOP) staff at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York. Epstein, who was awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges, died of apparent suicide on August 10, 2019. The report found that staff failed to conduct regular 30-minute checks on Epstein’s cell, as required, and that surveillance cameras in his unit were either inoperative or not monitored adequately. The night of Epstein's death, officers on duty had fallen asleep or were otherwise occupied, leaving him unsupervised for hours, which the OIG noted as a direct violation of BOP policies. These failures contributed to the conditions that allowed Epstein the opportunity to take his own life.<br /><br />The report also highlighted a pattern of understaffing, low morale, and inadequate training at the facility, which OIG officials noted could have affected the staff’s attentiveness and contributed to policy non-compliance. Despite the extensive scrutiny surrounding Epstein, including prior suicide attempts, the OIG noted that prison staff were inadequately briefed on his heightened risk level. This lack of communication, combined with the failure of supervisory staff to enforce accountability, created an environment where critical protocols were ignored. The report concluded that systemic issues within the BOP were likely contributors to the failures in Epstein’s case and recommended measures to improve oversight, ensure policy adherence, and address structural weaknesses in the federal prison system.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72805691</guid><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72805691/epsteinoigchapter5prt4.mp3" length="12782907" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4c4c2315-6e61-4651-9792-1c369a5c73e8/4c4c2315-6e61-4651-9792-1c369a5c73e8.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4c4c2315-6e61-4651-9792-1c369a5c73e8/4c4c2315-6e61-4651-9792-1c369a5c73e8.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4c4c2315-6e61-4651-9792-1c369a5c73e8/4c4c2315-6e61-4651-9792-1c369a5c73e8.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report on Jeffrey Epstein's death in federal custody revealed severe lapses in protocol, negligence, and misconduct by Bureau of Prisons (BOP) staff at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report on Jeffrey Epstein's death in federal custody revealed severe lapses in protocol, negligence, and misconduct by Bureau of Prisons (BOP) staff at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York. Epstein, who was awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges, died of apparent suicide on August 10, 2019. The report found that staff failed to conduct regular 30-minute checks on Epstein’s cell, as required, and that surveillance cameras in his unit were either inoperative or not monitored adequately. The night of Epstein's death, officers on duty had fallen asleep or were otherwise occupied, leaving him unsupervised for hours, which the OIG noted as a direct violation of BOP policies. These failures contributed to the conditions that allowed Epstein the opportunity to take his own life.<br /><br />The report also highlighted a pattern of understaffing, low morale, and inadequate training at the facility, which OIG officials noted could have affected the staff’s attentiveness and contributed to policy non-compliance. Despite the extensive scrutiny surrounding Epstein, including prior suicide attempts, the OIG noted that prison staff were inadequately briefed on his heightened risk level. This lack of communication, combined with the failure of supervisory staff to enforce accountability, created an environment where critical protocols were ignored. The report concluded that systemic issues within the BOP were likely contributors to the failures in Epstein’s case and recommended measures to improve oversight, ensure policy adherence, and address structural weaknesses in the federal prison system.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>799</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The OIG Report Into Jeffrey Epstein's Death: The Events Of August 8-10 And Epstein's Death (Chapter 5)( Part 3)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-oig-report-into-jeffrey-epstein-s-death-the-events-of-august-8-10-and-epstein-s-death-chapter-5-part-3--72805695</link><description><![CDATA[The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report on Jeffrey Epstein's death in federal custody revealed severe lapses in protocol, negligence, and misconduct by Bureau of Prisons (BOP) staff at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York. Epstein, who was awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges, died of apparent suicide on August 10, 2019. The report found that staff failed to conduct regular 30-minute checks on Epstein’s cell, as required, and that surveillance cameras in his unit were either inoperative or not monitored adequately. The night of Epstein's death, officers on duty had fallen asleep or were otherwise occupied, leaving him unsupervised for hours, which the OIG noted as a direct violation of BOP policies. These failures contributed to the conditions that allowed Epstein the opportunity to take his own life.<br /><br />The report also highlighted a pattern of understaffing, low morale, and inadequate training at the facility, which OIG officials noted could have affected the staff’s attentiveness and contributed to policy non-compliance. Despite the extensive scrutiny surrounding Epstein, including prior suicide attempts, the OIG noted that prison staff were inadequately briefed on his heightened risk level. This lack of communication, combined with the failure of supervisory staff to enforce accountability, created an environment where critical protocols were ignored. The report concluded that systemic issues within the BOP were likely contributors to the failures in Epstein’s case and recommended measures to improve oversight, ensure policy adherence, and address structural weaknesses in the federal prison system.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72805695</guid><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72805695/epsteinoigchapter5prt3.mp3" length="11474695" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f325dd1a-6ffa-47c8-a244-5d282df4d2b2/f325dd1a-6ffa-47c8-a244-5d282df4d2b2.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f325dd1a-6ffa-47c8-a244-5d282df4d2b2/f325dd1a-6ffa-47c8-a244-5d282df4d2b2.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f325dd1a-6ffa-47c8-a244-5d282df4d2b2/f325dd1a-6ffa-47c8-a244-5d282df4d2b2.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report on Jeffrey Epstein's death in federal custody revealed severe lapses in protocol, negligence, and misconduct by Bureau of Prisons (BOP) staff at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report on Jeffrey Epstein's death in federal custody revealed severe lapses in protocol, negligence, and misconduct by Bureau of Prisons (BOP) staff at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York. Epstein, who was awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges, died of apparent suicide on August 10, 2019. The report found that staff failed to conduct regular 30-minute checks on Epstein’s cell, as required, and that surveillance cameras in his unit were either inoperative or not monitored adequately. The night of Epstein's death, officers on duty had fallen asleep or were otherwise occupied, leaving him unsupervised for hours, which the OIG noted as a direct violation of BOP policies. These failures contributed to the conditions that allowed Epstein the opportunity to take his own life.<br /><br />The report also highlighted a pattern of understaffing, low morale, and inadequate training at the facility, which OIG officials noted could have affected the staff’s attentiveness and contributed to policy non-compliance. Despite the extensive scrutiny surrounding Epstein, including prior suicide attempts, the OIG noted that prison staff were inadequately briefed on his heightened risk level. This lack of communication, combined with the failure of supervisory staff to enforce accountability, created an environment where critical protocols were ignored. The report concluded that systemic issues within the BOP were likely contributors to the failures in Epstein’s case and recommended measures to improve oversight, ensure policy adherence, and address structural weaknesses in the federal prison system.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>718</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The OIG Report Into Jeffrey Epstein's Death: The Events Of August 8-10 And Epstein's Death (Chapter 5)( Part 2)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-oig-report-into-jeffrey-epstein-s-death-the-events-of-august-8-10-and-epstein-s-death-chapter-5-part-2--72805694</link><description><![CDATA[The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report on Jeffrey Epstein's death in federal custody revealed severe lapses in protocol, negligence, and misconduct by Bureau of Prisons (BOP) staff at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York. Epstein, who was awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges, died of apparent suicide on August 10, 2019. The report found that staff failed to conduct regular 30-minute checks on Epstein’s cell, as required, and that surveillance cameras in his unit were either inoperative or not monitored adequately. The night of Epstein's death, officers on duty had fallen asleep or were otherwise occupied, leaving him unsupervised for hours, which the OIG noted as a direct violation of BOP policies. These failures contributed to the conditions that allowed Epstein the opportunity to take his own life.<br /><br />The report also highlighted a pattern of understaffing, low morale, and inadequate training at the facility, which OIG officials noted could have affected the staff’s attentiveness and contributed to policy non-compliance. Despite the extensive scrutiny surrounding Epstein, including prior suicide attempts, the OIG noted that prison staff were inadequately briefed on his heightened risk level. This lack of communication, combined with the failure of supervisory staff to enforce accountability, created an environment where critical protocols were ignored. The report concluded that systemic issues within the BOP were likely contributors to the failures in Epstein’s case and recommended measures to improve oversight, ensure policy adherence, and address structural weaknesses in the federal prison system.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72805694</guid><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72805694/epsteinoigchapter5prt2.mp3" length="12657937" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/16b52d15-e04b-4849-a76f-02f9fe2852c5/16b52d15-e04b-4849-a76f-02f9fe2852c5.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/16b52d15-e04b-4849-a76f-02f9fe2852c5/16b52d15-e04b-4849-a76f-02f9fe2852c5.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/16b52d15-e04b-4849-a76f-02f9fe2852c5/16b52d15-e04b-4849-a76f-02f9fe2852c5.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report on Jeffrey Epstein's death in federal custody revealed severe lapses in protocol, negligence, and misconduct by Bureau of Prisons (BOP) staff at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report on Jeffrey Epstein's death in federal custody revealed severe lapses in protocol, negligence, and misconduct by Bureau of Prisons (BOP) staff at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York. Epstein, who was awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges, died of apparent suicide on August 10, 2019. The report found that staff failed to conduct regular 30-minute checks on Epstein’s cell, as required, and that surveillance cameras in his unit were either inoperative or not monitored adequately. The night of Epstein's death, officers on duty had fallen asleep or were otherwise occupied, leaving him unsupervised for hours, which the OIG noted as a direct violation of BOP policies. These failures contributed to the conditions that allowed Epstein the opportunity to take his own life.<br /><br />The report also highlighted a pattern of understaffing, low morale, and inadequate training at the facility, which OIG officials noted could have affected the staff’s attentiveness and contributed to policy non-compliance. Despite the extensive scrutiny surrounding Epstein, including prior suicide attempts, the OIG noted that prison staff were inadequately briefed on his heightened risk level. This lack of communication, combined with the failure of supervisory staff to enforce accountability, created an environment where critical protocols were ignored. The report concluded that systemic issues within the BOP were likely contributors to the failures in Epstein’s case and recommended measures to improve oversight, ensure policy adherence, and address structural weaknesses in the federal prison system.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>792</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The OIG Report Into Jeffrey Epstein's Death: The Events Of August 8-10 And Epstein's Death (Chapter 5)( Part 1)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-oig-report-into-jeffrey-epstein-s-death-the-events-of-august-8-10-and-epstein-s-death-chapter-5-part-1--72805692</link><description><![CDATA[The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report on Jeffrey Epstein's death in federal custody revealed severe lapses in protocol, negligence, and misconduct by Bureau of Prisons (BOP) staff at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York. Epstein, who was awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges, died of apparent suicide on August 10, 2019. The report found that staff failed to conduct regular 30-minute checks on Epstein’s cell, as required, and that surveillance cameras in his unit were either inoperative or not monitored adequately. The night of Epstein's death, officers on duty had fallen asleep or were otherwise occupied, leaving him unsupervised for hours, which the OIG noted as a direct violation of BOP policies. These failures contributed to the conditions that allowed Epstein the opportunity to take his own life.<br /><br />The report also highlighted a pattern of understaffing, low morale, and inadequate training at the facility, which OIG officials noted could have affected the staff’s attentiveness and contributed to policy non-compliance. Despite the extensive scrutiny surrounding Epstein, including prior suicide attempts, the OIG noted that prison staff were inadequately briefed on his heightened risk level. This lack of communication, combined with the failure of supervisory staff to enforce accountability, created an environment where critical protocols were ignored. The report concluded that systemic issues within the BOP were likely contributors to the failures in Epstein’s case and recommended measures to improve oversight, ensure policy adherence, and address structural weaknesses in the federal prison system.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72805692</guid><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 22:30:01 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72805692/epsteinoigchapter5prt1.mp3" length="12355335" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/07ee5f52-5bcc-49f9-92ce-0d74ebae7207/07ee5f52-5bcc-49f9-92ce-0d74ebae7207.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/07ee5f52-5bcc-49f9-92ce-0d74ebae7207/07ee5f52-5bcc-49f9-92ce-0d74ebae7207.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/07ee5f52-5bcc-49f9-92ce-0d74ebae7207/07ee5f52-5bcc-49f9-92ce-0d74ebae7207.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report on Jeffrey Epstein's death in federal custody revealed severe lapses in protocol, negligence, and misconduct by Bureau of Prisons (BOP) staff at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report on Jeffrey Epstein's death in federal custody revealed severe lapses in protocol, negligence, and misconduct by Bureau of Prisons (BOP) staff at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York. Epstein, who was awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges, died of apparent suicide on August 10, 2019. The report found that staff failed to conduct regular 30-minute checks on Epstein’s cell, as required, and that surveillance cameras in his unit were either inoperative or not monitored adequately. The night of Epstein's death, officers on duty had fallen asleep or were otherwise occupied, leaving him unsupervised for hours, which the OIG noted as a direct violation of BOP policies. These failures contributed to the conditions that allowed Epstein the opportunity to take his own life.<br /><br />The report also highlighted a pattern of understaffing, low morale, and inadequate training at the facility, which OIG officials noted could have affected the staff’s attentiveness and contributed to policy non-compliance. Despite the extensive scrutiny surrounding Epstein, including prior suicide attempts, the OIG noted that prison staff were inadequately briefed on his heightened risk level. This lack of communication, combined with the failure of supervisory staff to enforce accountability, created an environment where critical protocols were ignored. The report concluded that systemic issues within the BOP were likely contributors to the failures in Epstein’s case and recommended measures to improve oversight, ensure policy adherence, and address structural weaknesses in the federal prison system.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>773</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Lesley Groff And The Transcript From Her Epstein Related Trip to Congress (Part 3) (7/6/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/lesley-groff-and-the-transcript-from-her-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-3-7-6-26--72840732</link><description><![CDATA[Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her central position was that Epstein kept her separated from his criminal life, that she never witnessed abuse, never had a victim disclose abuse to her, and did not knowingly help Epstein or Maxwell commit crimes. She described Epstein as a “master manipulator” who lied to her and kept his “legitimate” world apart from his abuse, while acknowledging that she scheduled massage appointments when Epstein provided names and numbers, sometimes circulated calendars that included those appointments early on, and understood the massages as routine at the time. She said she did not personally meet the massage providers, did not know they were minors or young women, and assumed they were masseuses, even though members pressed her on why an extremely wealthy man would use rotating names and phone numbers instead of a professional massage service.<br /><br />The questioning also focused heavily on Epstein’s network and whether Groff had knowledge of powerful men being provided access to girls or young women through Epstein or Maxwell. Groff repeatedly answered no when asked whether she had arranged massages for prominent figures, knew of sexual activity involving minors or young women, or knew of anyone who knowingly facilitated Epstein’s crimes. She acknowledged scheduling or connecting Epstein with high-profile contacts, including Prince Andrew, Ehud Barak, Larry Summers, George Mitchell, John Kerry, Wesley Clark, Bill Clinton-related circles, and Donald Trump phone calls, but denied arranging Trump travel during her employment and denied knowledge of Trump-related law enforcement communications. She also said she never suspected Epstein or Maxwell of working with any intelligence service. Overall, Groff’s testimony was defensive and narrow: she admitted to being part of the machinery that kept Epstein’s calendar and contacts moving, but insisted she never saw the criminal operation underneath it and never knowingly enabled it.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:  <br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72840732</guid><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 20:30:01 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72840732/grofftranscript3.mp3" length="12583541" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/eea87388-79bb-47d4-96b0-cddc5ee08fa2/eea87388-79bb-47d4-96b0-cddc5ee08fa2.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/eea87388-79bb-47d4-96b0-cddc5ee08fa2/eea87388-79bb-47d4-96b0-cddc5ee08fa2.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/eea87388-79bb-47d4-96b0-cddc5ee08fa2/eea87388-79bb-47d4-96b0-cddc5ee08fa2.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her central position was that Epstein kept her separated from his criminal life, that she never witnessed abuse, never had a victim disclose abuse to her, and did not knowingly help Epstein or Maxwell commit crimes. She described Epstein as a “master manipulator” who lied to her and kept his “legitimate” world apart from his abuse, while acknowledging that she scheduled massage appointments when Epstein provided names and numbers, sometimes circulated calendars that included those appointments early on, and understood the massages as routine at the time. She said she did not personally meet the massage providers, did not know they were minors or young women, and assumed they were masseuses, even though members pressed her on why an extremely wealthy man would use rotating names and phone numbers instead of a professional massage service.<br /><br />The questioning also focused heavily on Epstein’s network and whether Groff had knowledge of powerful men being provided access to girls or young women through Epstein or Maxwell. Groff repeatedly answered no when asked whether she had arranged massages for prominent figures, knew of sexual activity involving minors or young women, or knew of anyone who knowingly facilitated Epstein’s crimes. She acknowledged scheduling or connecting Epstein with high-profile contacts, including Prince Andrew, Ehud Barak, Larry Summers, George Mitchell, John Kerry, Wesley Clark, Bill Clinton-related circles, and Donald Trump phone calls, but denied arranging Trump travel during her employment and denied knowledge of Trump-related law enforcement communications. She also said she never suspected Epstein or Maxwell of working with any intelligence service. Overall, Groff’s testimony was defensive and narrow: she admitted to being part of the machinery that kept Epstein’s calendar and contacts moving, but insisted she never saw the criminal operation underneath it and never knowingly enabled it.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:  <br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>787</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Lesley Groff And The Transcript From Her Epstein Related Trip to Congress (Part 2) (7/5/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/lesley-groff-and-the-transcript-from-her-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-2-7-5-26--72819527</link><description><![CDATA[Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her central position was that Epstein kept her separated from his criminal life, that she never witnessed abuse, never had a victim disclose abuse to her, and did not knowingly help Epstein or Maxwell commit crimes. She described Epstein as a “master manipulator” who lied to her and kept his “legitimate” world apart from his abuse, while acknowledging that she scheduled massage appointments when Epstein provided names and numbers, sometimes circulated calendars that included those appointments early on, and understood the massages as routine at the time. She said she did not personally meet the massage providers, did not know they were minors or young women, and assumed they were masseuses, even though members pressed her on why an extremely wealthy man would use rotating names and phone numbers instead of a professional massage service.<br /><br />The questioning also focused heavily on Epstein’s network and whether Groff had knowledge of powerful men being provided access to girls or young women through Epstein or Maxwell. Groff repeatedly answered no when asked whether she had arranged massages for prominent figures, knew of sexual activity involving minors or young women, or knew of anyone who knowingly facilitated Epstein’s crimes. She acknowledged scheduling or connecting Epstein with high-profile contacts, including Prince Andrew, Ehud Barak, Larry Summers, George Mitchell, John Kerry, Wesley Clark, Bill Clinton-related circles, and Donald Trump phone calls, but denied arranging Trump travel during her employment and denied knowledge of Trump-related law enforcement communications. She also said she never suspected Epstein or Maxwell of working with any intelligence service. Overall, Groff’s testimony was defensive and narrow: she admitted to being part of the machinery that kept Epstein’s calendar and contacts moving, but insisted she never saw the criminal operation underneath it and never knowingly enabled it.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:  <br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72819527</guid><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 18:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72819527/grofftranscript2.mp3" length="13076733" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/fb6e9bc7-4441-4065-a35d-3199e78a1658/fb6e9bc7-4441-4065-a35d-3199e78a1658.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/fb6e9bc7-4441-4065-a35d-3199e78a1658/fb6e9bc7-4441-4065-a35d-3199e78a1658.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/fb6e9bc7-4441-4065-a35d-3199e78a1658/fb6e9bc7-4441-4065-a35d-3199e78a1658.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her central position was that Epstein kept her separated from his criminal life, that she never witnessed abuse, never had a victim disclose abuse to her, and did not knowingly help Epstein or Maxwell commit crimes. She described Epstein as a “master manipulator” who lied to her and kept his “legitimate” world apart from his abuse, while acknowledging that she scheduled massage appointments when Epstein provided names and numbers, sometimes circulated calendars that included those appointments early on, and understood the massages as routine at the time. She said she did not personally meet the massage providers, did not know they were minors or young women, and assumed they were masseuses, even though members pressed her on why an extremely wealthy man would use rotating names and phone numbers instead of a professional massage service.<br /><br />The questioning also focused heavily on Epstein’s network and whether Groff had knowledge of powerful men being provided access to girls or young women through Epstein or Maxwell. Groff repeatedly answered no when asked whether she had arranged massages for prominent figures, knew of sexual activity involving minors or young women, or knew of anyone who knowingly facilitated Epstein’s crimes. She acknowledged scheduling or connecting Epstein with high-profile contacts, including Prince Andrew, Ehud Barak, Larry Summers, George Mitchell, John Kerry, Wesley Clark, Bill Clinton-related circles, and Donald Trump phone calls, but denied arranging Trump travel during her employment and denied knowledge of Trump-related law enforcement communications. She also said she never suspected Epstein or Maxwell of working with any intelligence service. Overall, Groff’s testimony was defensive and narrow: she admitted to being part of the machinery that kept Epstein’s calendar and contacts moving, but insisted she never saw the criminal operation underneath it and never knowingly enabled it.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:  <br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>818</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Judge Warns Melania Trump’s Lawyers Over Sanctions Push Against Michael Wolff (7/7/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/judge-warns-melania-trump-s-lawyers-over-sanctions-push-against-michael-wolff-7-7-26--72838129</link><description><![CDATA[A Manhattan federal judge warned Melania Trump’s lawyers to be careful as they pursue sanctions against journalist and Trump biographer Michael Wolff, even after the court had already dismissed Wolff’s anti-SLAPP lawsuit against her. Wolff had filed the case after Melania Trump threatened a $1 billion defamation suit over comments he made linking her to Jeffrey Epstein, allegations her side has rejected. Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil previously dismissed Wolff’s lawsuit as an improper attempt to head off a defamation case before it was filed, but when Trump’s lawyers said they still wanted sanctions against Wolff, the judge cautioned that sanctions require more than simply arguing that the lawsuit was weak or wrong.<br /><br />The hearing framed the fight as a continuing legal clash over press speech, defamation threats, and courtroom strategy. Melania Trump’s team argued that Wolff’s lawsuit was frivolous and deserved punishment, while Wolff’s side argued the sanctions push was another escalation meant to intimidate and drain him financially. Vyskocil appeared skeptical of turning the dismissed case into a sanctions battle, noting the high bar for punishment and warning Trump’s attorneys not to overreach. The result is that Melania Trump won the first round by getting Wolff’s case tossed, but the judge signaled that trying to keep the fight alive through sanctions may be a much harder sell.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://courthousenews.com/judge-cautions-melania-trump-against-trying-to-sanction-journalist-michael-wolff/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Judge cautions Melania Trump against trying to sanction journalist Michael Wolff | Courthouse News Service</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72838129</guid><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72838129/melanialookstosanctionwolff.mp3" length="11042107" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f0bcf75f-2e55-4852-8385-d8aed76eaa0b/f0bcf75f-2e55-4852-8385-d8aed76eaa0b.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f0bcf75f-2e55-4852-8385-d8aed76eaa0b/f0bcf75f-2e55-4852-8385-d8aed76eaa0b.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f0bcf75f-2e55-4852-8385-d8aed76eaa0b/f0bcf75f-2e55-4852-8385-d8aed76eaa0b.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A Manhattan federal judge warned Melania Trump’s lawyers to be careful as they pursue sanctions against journalist and Trump biographer Michael Wolff, even after the court had already dismissed Wolff’s anti-SLAPP lawsuit against her. Wolff had filed...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A Manhattan federal judge warned Melania Trump’s lawyers to be careful as they pursue sanctions against journalist and Trump biographer Michael Wolff, even after the court had already dismissed Wolff’s anti-SLAPP lawsuit against her. Wolff had filed the case after Melania Trump threatened a $1 billion defamation suit over comments he made linking her to Jeffrey Epstein, allegations her side has rejected. Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil previously dismissed Wolff’s lawsuit as an improper attempt to head off a defamation case before it was filed, but when Trump’s lawyers said they still wanted sanctions against Wolff, the judge cautioned that sanctions require more than simply arguing that the lawsuit was weak or wrong.<br /><br />The hearing framed the fight as a continuing legal clash over press speech, defamation threats, and courtroom strategy. Melania Trump’s team argued that Wolff’s lawsuit was frivolous and deserved punishment, while Wolff’s side argued the sanctions push was another escalation meant to intimidate and drain him financially. Vyskocil appeared skeptical of turning the dismissed case into a sanctions battle, noting the high bar for punishment and warning Trump’s attorneys not to overreach. The result is that Melania Trump won the first round by getting Wolff’s case tossed, but the judge signaled that trying to keep the fight alive through sanctions may be a much harder sell.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://courthousenews.com/judge-cautions-melania-trump-against-trying-to-sanction-journalist-michael-wolff/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Judge cautions Melania Trump against trying to sanction journalist Michael Wolff | Courthouse News Service</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>691</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Wyden Presses Oversight Committee to Dig Deeper Into Black’s Epstein Ties (7/6/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/wyden-presses-oversight-committee-to-dig-deeper-into-black-s-epstein-ties-7-6-26--72838130</link><description><![CDATA[Senator Ron Wyden is pressing for deeper answers about Leon Black’s financial relationship with Jeffrey Epstein as congressional scrutiny of Black intensifies. According to the reporting, Wyden’s Senate Finance Committee investigation has focused on why Black transferred an estimated $170 million to Epstein between 2012 and 2017, payments Wyden argues were far larger than what Black paid to established tax and estate-planning professionals already handling his affairs. Wyden has sent his findings to the House Oversight Committee ahead of Black’s congressional appearance, urging investigators to dig harder into financial records, settlement payments, and the movement of money connected to Epstein’s network.<br /><br /><br />The central issue is whether Epstein’s role in Black’s financial life was truly limited to tax and estate advice, as Black has maintained, or whether the money trail points to something broader and more troubling. Wyden has raised questions about whether Epstein acted as an intermediary for payments to women and whether records exist involving settlement agreements. The article also notes Black’s multimillion-dollar settlement with the Government of the U.S. Virgin Islands, which resolved civil claims without Black admitting wrongdoing, as another area now feeding congressional interest. The broader picture is that Black’s Epstein ties are no longer being examined merely as a reputational problem; they are being treated as a financial, legal, and oversight problem that Congress still believes has unanswered questions at its center.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.grantspasstribune.com/wyden-presses-for-answers-as-congressional-scrutiny-of-leon-black-deepens/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Wyden Presses for Answers as Congressional Scrutiny of Leon Black Deepens</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72838130</guid><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72838130/wydenblackmoneychase.mp3" length="12988543" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5078c9e8-8d0a-4b55-8934-edd45599bfdb/5078c9e8-8d0a-4b55-8934-edd45599bfdb.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5078c9e8-8d0a-4b55-8934-edd45599bfdb/5078c9e8-8d0a-4b55-8934-edd45599bfdb.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5078c9e8-8d0a-4b55-8934-edd45599bfdb/5078c9e8-8d0a-4b55-8934-edd45599bfdb.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Senator Ron Wyden is pressing for deeper answers about Leon Black’s financial relationship with Jeffrey Epstein as congressional scrutiny of Black intensifies. According to the reporting, Wyden’s Senate Finance Committee investigation has focused on...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Senator Ron Wyden is pressing for deeper answers about Leon Black’s financial relationship with Jeffrey Epstein as congressional scrutiny of Black intensifies. According to the reporting, Wyden’s Senate Finance Committee investigation has focused on why Black transferred an estimated $170 million to Epstein between 2012 and 2017, payments Wyden argues were far larger than what Black paid to established tax and estate-planning professionals already handling his affairs. Wyden has sent his findings to the House Oversight Committee ahead of Black’s congressional appearance, urging investigators to dig harder into financial records, settlement payments, and the movement of money connected to Epstein’s network.<br /><br /><br />The central issue is whether Epstein’s role in Black’s financial life was truly limited to tax and estate advice, as Black has maintained, or whether the money trail points to something broader and more troubling. Wyden has raised questions about whether Epstein acted as an intermediary for payments to women and whether records exist involving settlement agreements. The article also notes Black’s multimillion-dollar settlement with the Government of the U.S. Virgin Islands, which resolved civil claims without Black admitting wrongdoing, as another area now feeding congressional interest. The broader picture is that Black’s Epstein ties are no longer being examined merely as a reputational problem; they are being treated as a financial, legal, and oversight problem that Congress still believes has unanswered questions at its center.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.grantspasstribune.com/wyden-presses-for-answers-as-congressional-scrutiny-of-leon-black-deepens/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Wyden Presses for Answers as Congressional Scrutiny of Leon Black Deepens</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>812</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>DOJ Refuses to Release More Epstein Files After Court Order (7/6/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/doj-refuses-to-release-more-epstein-files-after-court-order-7-6-26--72838134</link><description><![CDATA[The Department of Justice declined to provide additional unredacted Epstein-related files after U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan ordered the department either to turn over more material or explain why it had been withheld. DOJ Associate U.S. Attorney General Stanley Woodward argued that the redactions were lawful and necessary, saying some materials contained sensitive victim information, personally identifiable details, or records that were already properly withheld under the Epstein Files Transparency Act. The DOJ also asked Sullivan to either delay the deadline by 60 days or accept the department’s explanation and disregard the production order.<br /><br /><br />The dispute centers on several categories of withheld material, including emails with concealed senders and recipients, a draft 2007 indictment from the Southern District of Florida, and handwritten interview notes involving a woman who made unsubstantiated assault allegations against Donald Trump, which Trump has denied. DOJ claimed some names were redacted to protect victims, said the draft indictment was already redacted in the original file it possessed, and argued that handwritten notes posed a higher risk of accidental disclosure of victim information. Sullivan had previously rejected DOJ’s arguments and found that the Public Interest Project had shown harm from the withheld records, while the DOJ continues to insist it has not violated the law and has complied with its obligations.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://abcnews.com/Politics/doj-declines-turn-additional-epstein-files-redactions/story?id=134430675" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">DOJ declines to turn over additional Epstein files, says redactions were appropriate - ABC News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72838134</guid><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72838134/dojrefusestohandovermoredocuments.mp3" length="10719025" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ab8919a2-336e-4340-908c-14277dab572b/ab8919a2-336e-4340-908c-14277dab572b.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ab8919a2-336e-4340-908c-14277dab572b/ab8919a2-336e-4340-908c-14277dab572b.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ab8919a2-336e-4340-908c-14277dab572b/ab8919a2-336e-4340-908c-14277dab572b.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Department of Justice declined to provide additional unredacted Epstein-related files after U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan ordered the department either to turn over more material or explain why it had been withheld. DOJ Associate U.S....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Department of Justice declined to provide additional unredacted Epstein-related files after U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan ordered the department either to turn over more material or explain why it had been withheld. DOJ Associate U.S. Attorney General Stanley Woodward argued that the redactions were lawful and necessary, saying some materials contained sensitive victim information, personally identifiable details, or records that were already properly withheld under the Epstein Files Transparency Act. The DOJ also asked Sullivan to either delay the deadline by 60 days or accept the department’s explanation and disregard the production order.<br /><br /><br />The dispute centers on several categories of withheld material, including emails with concealed senders and recipients, a draft 2007 indictment from the Southern District of Florida, and handwritten interview notes involving a woman who made unsubstantiated assault allegations against Donald Trump, which Trump has denied. DOJ claimed some names were redacted to protect victims, said the draft indictment was already redacted in the original file it possessed, and argued that handwritten notes posed a higher risk of accidental disclosure of victim information. Sullivan had previously rejected DOJ’s arguments and found that the Public Interest Project had shown harm from the withheld records, while the DOJ continues to insist it has not violated the law and has complied with its obligations.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://abcnews.com/Politics/doj-declines-turn-additional-epstein-files-redactions/story?id=134430675" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">DOJ declines to turn over additional Epstein files, says redactions were appropriate - ABC News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>670</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The OIG Report Detailing The Investigation Into Epstein's NPA (Part 31-33) (7/6/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-oig-report-detailing-the-investigation-into-epstein-s-npa-part-31-33-7-6-26--72827866</link><description><![CDATA[The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein’s high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.<br /><br />Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/opr/page/file/1336471/dl" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">dl (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72827866</guid><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 10:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72827866/megaoignpa31n32n33.mp3" length="38252504" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/dce08a70-9a71-4dd3-931b-d6808472096c/dce08a70-9a71-4dd3-931b-d6808472096c.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/dce08a70-9a71-4dd3-931b-d6808472096c/dce08a70-9a71-4dd3-931b-d6808472096c.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/dce08a70-9a71-4dd3-931b-d6808472096c/dce08a70-9a71-4dd3-931b-d6808472096c.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein’s high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.<br /><br />Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/opr/page/file/1336471/dl" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">dl (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2391</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The OIG Report Detailing The Investigation Into Epstein's NPA (Part 28-31) (7/5/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-oig-report-detailing-the-investigation-into-epstein-s-npa-part-28-31-7-5-26--72827867</link><description><![CDATA[The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein’s high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.<br /><br />Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/opr/page/file/1336471/dl" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">dl (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72827867</guid><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72827867/megaoignpa28n29n30n31.mp3" length="44858767" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a4378ec4-a4a7-4e0f-be1d-47a52511e1f1/a4378ec4-a4a7-4e0f-be1d-47a52511e1f1.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a4378ec4-a4a7-4e0f-be1d-47a52511e1f1/a4378ec4-a4a7-4e0f-be1d-47a52511e1f1.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a4378ec4-a4a7-4e0f-be1d-47a52511e1f1/a4378ec4-a4a7-4e0f-be1d-47a52511e1f1.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein’s high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.<br /><br />Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/opr/page/file/1336471/dl" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">dl (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2804</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The OIG Report Detailing The Investigation Into Epstein's NPA (Part 24-27) (7/5/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-oig-report-detailing-the-investigation-into-epstein-s-npa-part-24-27-7-5-26--72827863</link><description><![CDATA[The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein’s high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.<br /><br />Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/opr/page/file/1336471/dl" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">dl (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72827863</guid><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72827863/meganpaoig24n25n26n27.mp3" length="50778323" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d95c0e01-211e-43da-baf8-e6a703361872/d95c0e01-211e-43da-baf8-e6a703361872.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d95c0e01-211e-43da-baf8-e6a703361872/d95c0e01-211e-43da-baf8-e6a703361872.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d95c0e01-211e-43da-baf8-e6a703361872/d95c0e01-211e-43da-baf8-e6a703361872.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein’s high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.<br /><br />Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/opr/page/file/1336471/dl" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">dl (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3174</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The OIG Report Into Jeffrey Epstein's Death:  The Custody And Care Of Epstein (Chapter 4 Part 4)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-oig-report-into-jeffrey-epstein-s-death-the-custody-and-care-of-epstein-chapter-4-part-4--72807774</link><description><![CDATA[​Chapter 4, Part 1 of the Office of the Inspector General's (OIG) report on Jeffrey Epstein's death delves into the custody and care provided to Epstein during his incarceration at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York. This section scrutinizes the protocols and procedures followed by the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) staff, highlighting significant lapses in adhering to established guidelines. The report identifies critical failures, such as inadequate monitoring, improper cell assignments, and insufficient communication among staff, which collectively contributed to the environment that allowed Epstein's suicide to occur.<br /><br />The OIG's investigation reveals that Epstein was left alone in his cell despite protocols requiring a cellmate for inmates with his profile. Additionally, mandatory 30-minute checks were not performed consistently, with some staff members reportedly sleeping during their shifts and falsifying records to cover up their negligence. These systemic failures underscore the need for comprehensive reforms within the BOP to prevent similar incidents in the future.<br /><br /><br />to contact  me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72807774</guid><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72807774/epsteinoigchapter4prt4.mp3" length="14239913" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6e634694-4568-4879-b5c5-c10fb4bea959/6e634694-4568-4879-b5c5-c10fb4bea959.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6e634694-4568-4879-b5c5-c10fb4bea959/6e634694-4568-4879-b5c5-c10fb4bea959.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6e634694-4568-4879-b5c5-c10fb4bea959/6e634694-4568-4879-b5c5-c10fb4bea959.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>​Chapter 4, Part 1 of the Office of the Inspector General's (OIG) report on Jeffrey Epstein's death delves into the custody and care provided to Epstein during his incarceration at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York. This section...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[​Chapter 4, Part 1 of the Office of the Inspector General's (OIG) report on Jeffrey Epstein's death delves into the custody and care provided to Epstein during his incarceration at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York. This section scrutinizes the protocols and procedures followed by the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) staff, highlighting significant lapses in adhering to established guidelines. The report identifies critical failures, such as inadequate monitoring, improper cell assignments, and insufficient communication among staff, which collectively contributed to the environment that allowed Epstein's suicide to occur.<br /><br />The OIG's investigation reveals that Epstein was left alone in his cell despite protocols requiring a cellmate for inmates with his profile. Additionally, mandatory 30-minute checks were not performed consistently, with some staff members reportedly sleeping during their shifts and falsifying records to cover up their negligence. These systemic failures underscore the need for comprehensive reforms within the BOP to prevent similar incidents in the future.<br /><br /><br />to contact  me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>890</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The OIG Report Into Jeffrey Epstein's Death:  The Custody And Care Of Epstein (Chapter 4 Part 3)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-oig-report-into-jeffrey-epstein-s-death-the-custody-and-care-of-epstein-chapter-4-part-3--72805687</link><description><![CDATA[​Chapter 4, Part 1 of the Office of the Inspector General's (OIG) report on Jeffrey Epstein's death delves into the custody and care provided to Epstein during his incarceration at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York. This section scrutinizes the protocols and procedures followed by the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) staff, highlighting significant lapses in adhering to established guidelines. The report identifies critical failures, such as inadequate monitoring, improper cell assignments, and insufficient communication among staff, which collectively contributed to the environment that allowed Epstein's suicide to occur.<br /><br />The OIG's investigation reveals that Epstein was left alone in his cell despite protocols requiring a cellmate for inmates with his profile. Additionally, mandatory 30-minute checks were not performed consistently, with some staff members reportedly sleeping during their shifts and falsifying records to cover up their negligence. These systemic failures underscore the need for comprehensive reforms within the BOP to prevent similar incidents in the future.<br /><br /><br />to contact  me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72805687</guid><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 02:30:01 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72805687/epsteinoigchapter4prt3.mp3" length="9818741" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4ac67100-93fe-4899-ae17-d6457fe7d3c5/4ac67100-93fe-4899-ae17-d6457fe7d3c5.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4ac67100-93fe-4899-ae17-d6457fe7d3c5/4ac67100-93fe-4899-ae17-d6457fe7d3c5.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4ac67100-93fe-4899-ae17-d6457fe7d3c5/4ac67100-93fe-4899-ae17-d6457fe7d3c5.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>​Chapter 4, Part 1 of the Office of the Inspector General's (OIG) report on Jeffrey Epstein's death delves into the custody and care provided to Epstein during his incarceration at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York. This section...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[​Chapter 4, Part 1 of the Office of the Inspector General's (OIG) report on Jeffrey Epstein's death delves into the custody and care provided to Epstein during his incarceration at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York. This section scrutinizes the protocols and procedures followed by the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) staff, highlighting significant lapses in adhering to established guidelines. The report identifies critical failures, such as inadequate monitoring, improper cell assignments, and insufficient communication among staff, which collectively contributed to the environment that allowed Epstein's suicide to occur.<br /><br />The OIG's investigation reveals that Epstein was left alone in his cell despite protocols requiring a cellmate for inmates with his profile. Additionally, mandatory 30-minute checks were not performed consistently, with some staff members reportedly sleeping during their shifts and falsifying records to cover up their negligence. These systemic failures underscore the need for comprehensive reforms within the BOP to prevent similar incidents in the future.<br /><br /><br />to contact  me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>614</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The OIG Report Into Jeffrey Epstein's Death:  The Custody And Care Of Epstein (Chapter 4 Part 2)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-oig-report-into-jeffrey-epstein-s-death-the-custody-and-care-of-epstein-chapter-4-part-2--72805685</link><description><![CDATA[​Chapter 4, Part 1 of the Office of the Inspector General's (OIG) report on Jeffrey Epstein's death delves into the custody and care provided to Epstein during his incarceration at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York. This section scrutinizes the protocols and procedures followed by the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) staff, highlighting significant lapses in adhering to established guidelines. The report identifies critical failures, such as inadequate monitoring, improper cell assignments, and insufficient communication among staff, which collectively contributed to the environment that allowed Epstein's suicide to occur.<br /><br />The OIG's investigation reveals that Epstein was left alone in his cell despite protocols requiring a cellmate for inmates with his profile. Additionally, mandatory 30-minute checks were not performed consistently, with some staff members reportedly sleeping during their shifts and falsifying records to cover up their negligence. These systemic failures underscore the need for comprehensive reforms within the BOP to prevent similar incidents in the future.<br /><br /><br />to contact  me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72805685</guid><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72805685/epsteinoigchapter4prt2.mp3" length="13453314" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/474cbb40-bdfa-4eae-ab37-8ded8a597d58/474cbb40-bdfa-4eae-ab37-8ded8a597d58.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/474cbb40-bdfa-4eae-ab37-8ded8a597d58/474cbb40-bdfa-4eae-ab37-8ded8a597d58.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/474cbb40-bdfa-4eae-ab37-8ded8a597d58/474cbb40-bdfa-4eae-ab37-8ded8a597d58.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>​Chapter 4, Part 1 of the Office of the Inspector General's (OIG) report on Jeffrey Epstein's death delves into the custody and care provided to Epstein during his incarceration at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York. This section...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[​Chapter 4, Part 1 of the Office of the Inspector General's (OIG) report on Jeffrey Epstein's death delves into the custody and care provided to Epstein during his incarceration at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York. This section scrutinizes the protocols and procedures followed by the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) staff, highlighting significant lapses in adhering to established guidelines. The report identifies critical failures, such as inadequate monitoring, improper cell assignments, and insufficient communication among staff, which collectively contributed to the environment that allowed Epstein's suicide to occur.<br /><br />The OIG's investigation reveals that Epstein was left alone in his cell despite protocols requiring a cellmate for inmates with his profile. Additionally, mandatory 30-minute checks were not performed consistently, with some staff members reportedly sleeping during their shifts and falsifying records to cover up their negligence. These systemic failures underscore the need for comprehensive reforms within the BOP to prevent similar incidents in the future.<br /><br /><br />to contact  me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>841</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The OIG Report Into Jeffrey Epstein's Death:  The Custody And Care Of Epstein (Chapter 4 Part 1)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-oig-report-into-jeffrey-epstein-s-death-the-custody-and-care-of-epstein-chapter-4-part-1--72805698</link><description><![CDATA[​Chapter 4, Part 1 of the Office of the Inspector General's (OIG) report on Jeffrey Epstein's death delves into the custody and care provided to Epstein during his incarceration at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York. This section scrutinizes the protocols and procedures followed by the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) staff, highlighting significant lapses in adhering to established guidelines. The report identifies critical failures, such as inadequate monitoring, improper cell assignments, and insufficient communication among staff, which collectively contributed to the environment that allowed Epstein's suicide to occur.<br /><br />The OIG's investigation reveals that Epstein was left alone in his cell despite protocols requiring a cellmate for inmates with his profile. Additionally, mandatory 30-minute checks were not performed consistently, with some staff members reportedly sleeping during their shifts and falsifying records to cover up their negligence. These systemic failures underscore the need for comprehensive reforms within the BOP to prevent similar incidents in the future.<br /><br /><br />to contact  me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72805698</guid><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2026 22:30:01 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72805698/epsteinoigchapter4prt1.mp3" length="14494868" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/69fcc760-9958-4cba-901f-d2489072e7ae/69fcc760-9958-4cba-901f-d2489072e7ae.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/69fcc760-9958-4cba-901f-d2489072e7ae/69fcc760-9958-4cba-901f-d2489072e7ae.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/69fcc760-9958-4cba-901f-d2489072e7ae/69fcc760-9958-4cba-901f-d2489072e7ae.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>​Chapter 4, Part 1 of the Office of the Inspector General's (OIG) report on Jeffrey Epstein's death delves into the custody and care provided to Epstein during his incarceration at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York. This section...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[​Chapter 4, Part 1 of the Office of the Inspector General's (OIG) report on Jeffrey Epstein's death delves into the custody and care provided to Epstein during his incarceration at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York. This section scrutinizes the protocols and procedures followed by the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) staff, highlighting significant lapses in adhering to established guidelines. The report identifies critical failures, such as inadequate monitoring, improper cell assignments, and insufficient communication among staff, which collectively contributed to the environment that allowed Epstein's suicide to occur.<br /><br />The OIG's investigation reveals that Epstein was left alone in his cell despite protocols requiring a cellmate for inmates with his profile. Additionally, mandatory 30-minute checks were not performed consistently, with some staff members reportedly sleeping during their shifts and falsifying records to cover up their negligence. These systemic failures underscore the need for comprehensive reforms within the BOP to prevent similar incidents in the future.<br /><br /><br />to contact  me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>906</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Lesley Groff And The Transcript From Her Epstein Related Trip to Congress (Part 1) (7/5/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/lesley-groff-and-the-transcript-from-her-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-1-7-5-26--72819526</link><description><![CDATA[Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her central position was that Epstein kept her separated from his criminal life, that she never witnessed abuse, never had a victim disclose abuse to her, and did not knowingly help Epstein or Maxwell commit crimes. She described Epstein as a “master manipulator” who lied to her and kept his “legitimate” world apart from his abuse, while acknowledging that she scheduled massage appointments when Epstein provided names and numbers, sometimes circulated calendars that included those appointments early on, and understood the massages as routine at the time. She said she did not personally meet the massage providers, did not know they were minors or young women, and assumed they were masseuses, even though members pressed her on why an extremely wealthy man would use rotating names and phone numbers instead of a professional massage service.<br /><br />The questioning also focused heavily on Epstein’s network and whether Groff had knowledge of powerful men being provided access to girls or young women through Epstein or Maxwell. Groff repeatedly answered no when asked whether she had arranged massages for prominent figures, knew of sexual activity involving minors or young women, or knew of anyone who knowingly facilitated Epstein’s crimes. She acknowledged scheduling or connecting Epstein with high-profile contacts, including Prince Andrew, Ehud Barak, Larry Summers, George Mitchell, John Kerry, Wesley Clark, Bill Clinton-related circles, and Donald Trump phone calls, but denied arranging Trump travel during her employment and denied knowledge of Trump-related law enforcement communications. She also said she never suspected Epstein or Maxwell of working with any intelligence service. Overall, Groff’s testimony was defensive and narrow: she admitted to being part of the machinery that kept Epstein’s calendar and contacts moving, but insisted she never saw the criminal operation underneath it and never knowingly enabled it.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:  <br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72819526</guid><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72819526/grofftranscript1.mp3" length="11357666" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/38125afd-728e-413c-b5fc-b4735098d0c2/38125afd-728e-413c-b5fc-b4735098d0c2.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/38125afd-728e-413c-b5fc-b4735098d0c2/38125afd-728e-413c-b5fc-b4735098d0c2.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/38125afd-728e-413c-b5fc-b4735098d0c2/38125afd-728e-413c-b5fc-b4735098d0c2.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Lesley Groff told the House Oversight Committee that she worked for Jeffrey Epstein from February 2001 until July 2019 as his secretary/administrative assistant, handling scheduling, calls, travel coordination, calendars, and staff logistics. Her central position was that Epstein kept her separated from his criminal life, that she never witnessed abuse, never had a victim disclose abuse to her, and did not knowingly help Epstein or Maxwell commit crimes. She described Epstein as a “master manipulator” who lied to her and kept his “legitimate” world apart from his abuse, while acknowledging that she scheduled massage appointments when Epstein provided names and numbers, sometimes circulated calendars that included those appointments early on, and understood the massages as routine at the time. She said she did not personally meet the massage providers, did not know they were minors or young women, and assumed they were masseuses, even though members pressed her on why an extremely wealthy man would use rotating names and phone numbers instead of a professional massage service.<br /><br />The questioning also focused heavily on Epstein’s network and whether Groff had knowledge of powerful men being provided access to girls or young women through Epstein or Maxwell. Groff repeatedly answered no when asked whether she had arranged massages for prominent figures, knew of sexual activity involving minors or young women, or knew of anyone who knowingly facilitated Epstein’s crimes. She acknowledged scheduling or connecting Epstein with high-profile contacts, including Prince Andrew, Ehud Barak, Larry Summers, George Mitchell, John Kerry, Wesley Clark, Bill Clinton-related circles, and Donald Trump phone calls, but denied arranging Trump travel during her employment and denied knowledge of Trump-related law enforcement communications. She also said she never suspected Epstein or Maxwell of working with any intelligence service. Overall, Groff’s testimony was defensive and narrow: she admitted to being part of the machinery that kept Epstein’s calendar and contacts moving, but insisted she never saw the criminal operation underneath it and never knowingly enabled it.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:  <br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lesley-Groff-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>710</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Bill Gates Epstein Related Congressional Transcripts (Part 16) (7/5/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-bill-gates-epstein-related-congressional-transcripts-part-16-7-5-26--72817020</link><description><![CDATA[<br />The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates testified that he met Epstein roughly 12 to 14 times between 2011 and 2014, saying he believed Epstein could help attract major philanthropic donations to global health initiatives through the Gates Foundation. He repeatedly described those meetings as "a mistake," insisted he never visited Epstein's private island, New Mexico ranch, or Florida residence, and said he never witnessed criminal conduct or participated in any of Epstein's illegal activities. Gates told lawmakers he ultimately concluded that Epstein had exaggerated both his financial connections and his ability to raise money for philanthropy.<br /><br /><br />One of the most closely watched portions of the transcript concerned allegations that Epstein sought to pressure Gates using knowledge of Gates' personal life. Gates acknowledged several extramarital affairs and testified that Epstein appeared to have learned about them, later making what Gates described as "veiled" attempts at blackmail by referencing those relationships and seeking money connected to one of the women. Gates said he believed Epstein "contemplated" blackmail but maintained he was never actually blackmailed, never paid Epstein to keep information secret, and never committed crimes with him. Throughout the interview, Gates emphasized that his association with Epstein damaged his judgment and reputation, expressed support for releasing the Epstein files and for continued investigations, and said survivors deserve justice while denying any involvement in Epstein's trafficking operation or abuse of minors.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72817020</guid><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2026 18:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72817020/gatestranscript16.mp3" length="14929546" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8691b345-30c7-4ede-a09f-1f943d4adace/8691b345-30c7-4ede-a09f-1f943d4adace.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8691b345-30c7-4ede-a09f-1f943d4adace/8691b345-30c7-4ede-a09f-1f943d4adace.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8691b345-30c7-4ede-a09f-1f943d4adace/8691b345-30c7-4ede-a09f-1f943d4adace.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br />The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates testified that he met Epstein roughly 12 to 14 times between 2011 and 2014, saying he believed Epstein could help attract major philanthropic donations to global health initiatives through the Gates Foundation. He repeatedly described those meetings as "a mistake," insisted he never visited Epstein's private island, New Mexico ranch, or Florida residence, and said he never witnessed criminal conduct or participated in any of Epstein's illegal activities. Gates told lawmakers he ultimately concluded that Epstein had exaggerated both his financial connections and his ability to raise money for philanthropy.<br /><br /><br />One of the most closely watched portions of the transcript concerned allegations that Epstein sought to pressure Gates using knowledge of Gates' personal life. Gates acknowledged several extramarital affairs and testified that Epstein appeared to have learned about them, later making what Gates described as "veiled" attempts at blackmail by referencing those relationships and seeking money connected to one of the women. Gates said he believed Epstein "contemplated" blackmail but maintained he was never actually blackmailed, never paid Epstein to keep information secret, and never committed crimes with him. Throughout the interview, Gates emphasized that his association with Epstein damaged his judgment and reputation, expressed support for releasing the Epstein files and for continued investigations, and said survivors deserve justice while denying any involvement in Epstein's trafficking operation or abuse of minors.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>934</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Bill Gates Epstein Related Congressional Transcripts (Part 15) (7/5/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-bill-gates-epstein-related-congressional-transcripts-part-15-7-5-26--72817022</link><description><![CDATA[<br />The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates testified that he met Epstein roughly 12 to 14 times between 2011 and 2014, saying he believed Epstein could help attract major philanthropic donations to global health initiatives through the Gates Foundation. He repeatedly described those meetings as "a mistake," insisted he never visited Epstein's private island, New Mexico ranch, or Florida residence, and said he never witnessed criminal conduct or participated in any of Epstein's illegal activities. Gates told lawmakers he ultimately concluded that Epstein had exaggerated both his financial connections and his ability to raise money for philanthropy.<br /><br /><br />One of the most closely watched portions of the transcript concerned allegations that Epstein sought to pressure Gates using knowledge of Gates' personal life. Gates acknowledged several extramarital affairs and testified that Epstein appeared to have learned about them, later making what Gates described as "veiled" attempts at blackmail by referencing those relationships and seeking money connected to one of the women. Gates said he believed Epstein "contemplated" blackmail but maintained he was never actually blackmailed, never paid Epstein to keep information secret, and never committed crimes with him. Throughout the interview, Gates emphasized that his association with Epstein damaged his judgment and reputation, expressed support for releasing the Epstein files and for continued investigations, and said survivors deserve justice while denying any involvement in Epstein's trafficking operation or abuse of minors.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72817022</guid><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2026 16:30:01 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72817022/gatestranscript15.mp3" length="11498519" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/431412fb-04a1-4dae-ab8c-6ee7b0bf37d8/431412fb-04a1-4dae-ab8c-6ee7b0bf37d8.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/431412fb-04a1-4dae-ab8c-6ee7b0bf37d8/431412fb-04a1-4dae-ab8c-6ee7b0bf37d8.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/431412fb-04a1-4dae-ab8c-6ee7b0bf37d8/431412fb-04a1-4dae-ab8c-6ee7b0bf37d8.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br />The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates testified that he met Epstein roughly 12 to 14 times between 2011 and 2014, saying he believed Epstein could help attract major philanthropic donations to global health initiatives through the Gates Foundation. He repeatedly described those meetings as "a mistake," insisted he never visited Epstein's private island, New Mexico ranch, or Florida residence, and said he never witnessed criminal conduct or participated in any of Epstein's illegal activities. Gates told lawmakers he ultimately concluded that Epstein had exaggerated both his financial connections and his ability to raise money for philanthropy.<br /><br /><br />One of the most closely watched portions of the transcript concerned allegations that Epstein sought to pressure Gates using knowledge of Gates' personal life. Gates acknowledged several extramarital affairs and testified that Epstein appeared to have learned about them, later making what Gates described as "veiled" attempts at blackmail by referencing those relationships and seeking money connected to one of the women. Gates said he believed Epstein "contemplated" blackmail but maintained he was never actually blackmailed, never paid Epstein to keep information secret, and never committed crimes with him. Throughout the interview, Gates emphasized that his association with Epstein damaged his judgment and reputation, expressed support for releasing the Epstein files and for continued investigations, and said survivors deserve justice while denying any involvement in Epstein's trafficking operation or abuse of minors.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>719</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The OIG Report Detailing The Investigation Into Epstein's NPA (Part 20-23) (7/5/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-oig-report-detailing-the-investigation-into-epstein-s-npa-part-20-23-7-5-26--72817737</link><description><![CDATA[The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein’s high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.<br /><br />Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/opr/page/file/1336471/dl" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">dl (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72817737</guid><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2026 14:30:01 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72817737/meganpaoig20n21n22n23.mp3" length="43858173" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cfcaac52-a94c-46a6-abaf-9ce250d1718d/cfcaac52-a94c-46a6-abaf-9ce250d1718d.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cfcaac52-a94c-46a6-abaf-9ce250d1718d/cfcaac52-a94c-46a6-abaf-9ce250d1718d.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cfcaac52-a94c-46a6-abaf-9ce250d1718d/cfcaac52-a94c-46a6-abaf-9ce250d1718d.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein’s high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.<br /><br />Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/opr/page/file/1336471/dl" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">dl (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2742</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The OIG Report Detailing The Investigation Into Epstein's NPA (Part 16-19) (7/5/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-oig-report-detailing-the-investigation-into-epstein-s-npa-part-16-19-7-5-26--72817739</link><description><![CDATA[The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein’s high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.<br /><br />Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/opr/page/file/1336471/dl" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">dl (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72817739</guid><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2026 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72817739/meganpaoig16n17n18n19.mp3" length="56141157" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e6918011-325c-4d9d-9d8d-6989c43a5348/e6918011-325c-4d9d-9d8d-6989c43a5348.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e6918011-325c-4d9d-9d8d-6989c43a5348/e6918011-325c-4d9d-9d8d-6989c43a5348.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e6918011-325c-4d9d-9d8d-6989c43a5348/e6918011-325c-4d9d-9d8d-6989c43a5348.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein’s high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.<br /><br />Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/opr/page/file/1336471/dl" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">dl (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3509</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The OIG Report Detailing The Investigation Into Epstein's NPA (Part 11-15) (7/5/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-oig-report-detailing-the-investigation-into-epstein-s-npa-part-11-15-7-5-26--72817736</link><description><![CDATA[The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein’s high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.<br /><br />Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/opr/page/file/1336471/dl" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">dl (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72817736</guid><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72817736/megaoignpa11n12n13n14n15.mp3" length="68276184" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/66d2610d-019e-421a-8147-4c5c354d7aad/66d2610d-019e-421a-8147-4c5c354d7aad.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/66d2610d-019e-421a-8147-4c5c354d7aad/66d2610d-019e-421a-8147-4c5c354d7aad.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/66d2610d-019e-421a-8147-4c5c354d7aad/66d2610d-019e-421a-8147-4c5c354d7aad.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein’s high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.<br /><br />Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/opr/page/file/1336471/dl" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">dl (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4268</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The OIG Report Detailing The Investigation Into Epstein's NPA (Part 6-10) (7/5/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-oig-report-detailing-the-investigation-into-epstein-s-npa-part-6-10-7-5-26--72817738</link><description><![CDATA[The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein’s high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.<br /><br />Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/opr/page/file/1336471/dl" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">dl (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72817738</guid><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72817738/megaoignpa6n7n8n9n10.mp3" length="66803296" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/43cef596-b705-4ab4-b7da-8a5adc6314a5/43cef596-b705-4ab4-b7da-8a5adc6314a5.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/43cef596-b705-4ab4-b7da-8a5adc6314a5/43cef596-b705-4ab4-b7da-8a5adc6314a5.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/43cef596-b705-4ab4-b7da-8a5adc6314a5/43cef596-b705-4ab4-b7da-8a5adc6314a5.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein’s high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.<br /><br />Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/opr/page/file/1336471/dl" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">dl (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4176</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The OIG Report Detailing The Investigation Into Epstein's NPA (Part 1-5) (7/4/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-oig-report-detailing-the-investigation-into-epstein-s-npa-part-1-5-7-4-26--72817740</link><description><![CDATA[The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein’s high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.<br /><br />Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/opr/page/file/1336471/dl" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">dl (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72817740</guid><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72817740/megaoignpa1n2n3n4n5.mp3" length="60296925" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/372bf4fa-cf36-4fa5-ad2a-be564c2421e6/372bf4fa-cf36-4fa5-ad2a-be564c2421e6.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/372bf4fa-cf36-4fa5-ad2a-be564c2421e6/372bf4fa-cf36-4fa5-ad2a-be564c2421e6.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/372bf4fa-cf36-4fa5-ad2a-be564c2421e6/372bf4fa-cf36-4fa5-ad2a-be564c2421e6.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) presents a disturbing portrait of federal cowardice, systemic failures, and deliberate abdication of prosecutorial duty. Instead of zealously pursuing justice against a serial predator with dozens of underage victims, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida, under Alexander Acosta, caved to Epstein’s high-powered legal team and crafted a sweetheart deal that immunized not just Epstein, but unnamed potential co-conspirators—many of whom are still shielded to this day. The report shows that career prosecutors initially prepared a 53-page indictment, but this was ultimately buried, replaced by state charges that led to minimal jail time, lenient conditions, and near-total impunity. The OIG paints the decision as a series of poor judgments rather than criminal misconduct, but this framing betrays the magnitude of what actually occurred: a calculated retreat in the face of wealth and influence.<br /><br />Critically, the report fails to hold any individuals truly accountable, nor does it demand structural reform that could prevent similar derelictions of justice. It accepts, without sufficient pushback, the justifications offered by federal prosecutors who claimed their hands were tied or that the case was too risky—despite overwhelming evidence and a mountain of victim statements. The OIG sidesteps the glaring reality that this was not just bureaucratic failure, but a protection racket masquerading as legal discretion. It treats corruption as incompetence and power as inevitability. The conclusion, ultimately, feels like a shrug—a bureaucratic absolution of one of the most disgraceful collapses of federal prosecutorial integrity in modern history. It is less a reckoning than a rubber stamp on institutional failure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/opr/page/file/1336471/dl" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">dl (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3769</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The Legal War Being Waged Between Michael Wolff And The Trump's (7/3/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-legal-war-being-waged-between-michael-wolff-and-the-trump-s-7-3-26--72806444</link><description><![CDATA[A prolonged legal dispute developed between journalist and author Michael Wolff and members of the Trump family over reporting and books that examined Donald Trump’s presidency and personal life. Wolff’s books—including Fire and Fury and later works—contained numerous claims based on interviews with people close to the Trump family and the administration. The Trump family and their lawyers repeatedly challenged Wolff’s reporting, arguing that many of the statements attributed to family members and associates were inaccurate, defamatory, or based on unreliable sourcing. Legal threats and cease-and-desist letters were issued in an effort to block publication or force corrections, with the Trump legal team claiming that Wolff’s work relied on sensationalism and fabricated or exaggerated quotes.<br /><br />Wolff and his publishers pushed back strongly, arguing that the books were protected under the First Amendment and based on extensive reporting and interviews conducted during and after the Trump presidency. His legal team maintained that public figures such as the Trump family face a high legal threshold when claiming defamation, particularly when the reporting concerns matters of public interest involving the presidency. The clash became a broader fight over press freedom, political journalism, and the limits of aggressive reporting on powerful figures. While the Trump family sought to challenge Wolff’s credibility and block the spread of his claims, Wolff framed the confrontation as an attempt by powerful political figures to intimidate a journalist and suppress unflattering reporting.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72806444</guid><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72806444/megawolffmelania.mp3" length="33793715" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/fa49e27c-2124-45b6-a9b2-0d578cd06cc8/fa49e27c-2124-45b6-a9b2-0d578cd06cc8.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/fa49e27c-2124-45b6-a9b2-0d578cd06cc8/fa49e27c-2124-45b6-a9b2-0d578cd06cc8.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/fa49e27c-2124-45b6-a9b2-0d578cd06cc8/fa49e27c-2124-45b6-a9b2-0d578cd06cc8.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A prolonged legal dispute developed between journalist and author Michael Wolff and members of the Trump family over reporting and books that examined Donald Trump’s presidency and personal life. Wolff’s books—including Fire and Fury and later...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A prolonged legal dispute developed between journalist and author Michael Wolff and members of the Trump family over reporting and books that examined Donald Trump’s presidency and personal life. Wolff’s books—including Fire and Fury and later works—contained numerous claims based on interviews with people close to the Trump family and the administration. The Trump family and their lawyers repeatedly challenged Wolff’s reporting, arguing that many of the statements attributed to family members and associates were inaccurate, defamatory, or based on unreliable sourcing. Legal threats and cease-and-desist letters were issued in an effort to block publication or force corrections, with the Trump legal team claiming that Wolff’s work relied on sensationalism and fabricated or exaggerated quotes.<br /><br />Wolff and his publishers pushed back strongly, arguing that the books were protected under the First Amendment and based on extensive reporting and interviews conducted during and after the Trump presidency. His legal team maintained that public figures such as the Trump family face a high legal threshold when claiming defamation, particularly when the reporting concerns matters of public interest involving the presidency. The clash became a broader fight over press freedom, political journalism, and the limits of aggressive reporting on powerful figures. While the Trump family sought to challenge Wolff’s credibility and block the spread of his claims, Wolff framed the confrontation as an attempt by powerful political figures to intimidate a journalist and suppress unflattering reporting.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2113</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The OIG Report Into Jeffrey Epstein's Death:  The Timeline (Chapter 3)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-oig-report-into-jeffrey-epstein-s-death-the-timeline-chapter-3--72805701</link><description><![CDATA[​Chapter 3 of the Office of the Inspector General's (OIG) report on Jeffrey Epstein's death provides a detailed timeline of events leading up to his suicide on August 10, 2019, at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York. The chapter highlights several critical lapses in protocol and staff performance. Notably, it details how Epstein's cellmate was transferred out on August 9, leaving him alone despite a standing requirement for him to have a cellmate due to his recent suicide attempt. Additionally, the report reveals that correctional officers failed to perform mandatory 30-minute checks on Epstein during the overnight hours, with some officers reportedly sleeping during their shifts and falsifying records to cover up their negligence.<br /><br />The OIG report further examines the condition of Epstein's cell and the circumstances of his death. It notes that surveillance cameras outside Epstein's cell malfunctioned on the night of his death, resulting in a lack of video evidence to clarify the events leading up to his suicide. The report also discusses the findings of the autopsy, which concluded that Epstein's injuries were consistent with suicide by hanging, with no signs of defensive wounds or struggle. These findings underscore the systemic failures at MCC, including inadequate staffing, poor management oversight, and failure to adhere to established protocols, all of which contributed to the environment that allowed Epstein's suicide to occur.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72805701</guid><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72805701/epsteinoigchapter3.mp3" length="17724021" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e3fef072-ca35-491b-be54-f97b2279c10d/e3fef072-ca35-491b-be54-f97b2279c10d.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e3fef072-ca35-491b-be54-f97b2279c10d/e3fef072-ca35-491b-be54-f97b2279c10d.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e3fef072-ca35-491b-be54-f97b2279c10d/e3fef072-ca35-491b-be54-f97b2279c10d.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>​Chapter 3 of the Office of the Inspector General's (OIG) report on Jeffrey Epstein's death provides a detailed timeline of events leading up to his suicide on August 10, 2019, at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York. The chapter...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[​Chapter 3 of the Office of the Inspector General's (OIG) report on Jeffrey Epstein's death provides a detailed timeline of events leading up to his suicide on August 10, 2019, at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York. The chapter highlights several critical lapses in protocol and staff performance. Notably, it details how Epstein's cellmate was transferred out on August 9, leaving him alone despite a standing requirement for him to have a cellmate due to his recent suicide attempt. Additionally, the report reveals that correctional officers failed to perform mandatory 30-minute checks on Epstein during the overnight hours, with some officers reportedly sleeping during their shifts and falsifying records to cover up their negligence.<br /><br />The OIG report further examines the condition of Epstein's cell and the circumstances of his death. It notes that surveillance cameras outside Epstein's cell malfunctioned on the night of his death, resulting in a lack of video evidence to clarify the events leading up to his suicide. The report also discusses the findings of the autopsy, which concluded that Epstein's injuries were consistent with suicide by hanging, with no signs of defensive wounds or struggle. These findings underscore the systemic failures at MCC, including inadequate staffing, poor management oversight, and failure to adhere to established protocols, all of which contributed to the environment that allowed Epstein's suicide to occur.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1108</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The OIG Report Into Jeffrey Epstein's Death: Background (Chapter 2 Part 2)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-oig-report-into-jeffrey-epstein-s-death-background-chapter-2-part-2--72805700</link><description><![CDATA[Chapter 2, Part 1 of the OIG report into Jeffrey Epstein’s death focuses on his initial detention and intake procedures at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York following his arrest on July 6, 2019. The report highlights significant failures in classification, supervision, and mental health assessments, noting that Epstein was initially placed in general population despite being a high-profile inmate facing serious federal charges. After concerns were raised about his safety and the risk of extortion, he was transferred to the Special Housing Unit (SHU), where additional lapses in protocol occurred. The chapter details how MCC officials failed to follow standard procedures for high-risk detainees, including properly documenting Epstein’s mental health evaluations and conducting required welfare checks. Despite being flagged as a suicide risk following a reported attempt on July 23, 2019, Epstein was removed from suicide watch within 24 hours, based on questionable psychiatric evaluations. The lack of clear communication among MCC staff, inadequate staffing, and disregard for established policies created an environment where Epstein’s well-being was poorly monitored, setting the stage for the critical lapses that would lead to his death weeks later.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><br /><a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72805700</guid><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72805700/epsteinoigchapter2prt2.mp3" length="24126737" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d6e16998-cb55-4191-867a-4402a6fb2fc6/d6e16998-cb55-4191-867a-4402a6fb2fc6.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d6e16998-cb55-4191-867a-4402a6fb2fc6/d6e16998-cb55-4191-867a-4402a6fb2fc6.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d6e16998-cb55-4191-867a-4402a6fb2fc6/d6e16998-cb55-4191-867a-4402a6fb2fc6.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Chapter 2, Part 1 of the OIG report into Jeffrey Epstein’s death focuses on his initial detention and intake procedures at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York following his arrest on July 6, 2019. The report highlights significant...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Chapter 2, Part 1 of the OIG report into Jeffrey Epstein’s death focuses on his initial detention and intake procedures at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York following his arrest on July 6, 2019. The report highlights significant failures in classification, supervision, and mental health assessments, noting that Epstein was initially placed in general population despite being a high-profile inmate facing serious federal charges. After concerns were raised about his safety and the risk of extortion, he was transferred to the Special Housing Unit (SHU), where additional lapses in protocol occurred. The chapter details how MCC officials failed to follow standard procedures for high-risk detainees, including properly documenting Epstein’s mental health evaluations and conducting required welfare checks. Despite being flagged as a suicide risk following a reported attempt on July 23, 2019, Epstein was removed from suicide watch within 24 hours, based on questionable psychiatric evaluations. The lack of clear communication among MCC staff, inadequate staffing, and disregard for established policies created an environment where Epstein’s well-being was poorly monitored, setting the stage for the critical lapses that would lead to his death weeks later.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><br /><a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1508</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The OIG Report Into Jeffrey Epstein's Death: Background (Chapter 2 Part 1)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-oig-report-into-jeffrey-epstein-s-death-background-chapter-2-part-1--72805699</link><description><![CDATA[Chapter 2, Part 1 of the OIG report into Jeffrey Epstein’s death focuses on his initial detention and intake procedures at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York following his arrest on July 6, 2019. The report highlights significant failures in classification, supervision, and mental health assessments, noting that Epstein was initially placed in general population despite being a high-profile inmate facing serious federal charges. After concerns were raised about his safety and the risk of extortion, he was transferred to the Special Housing Unit (SHU), where additional lapses in protocol occurred. The chapter details how MCC officials failed to follow standard procedures for high-risk detainees, including properly documenting Epstein’s mental health evaluations and conducting required welfare checks. Despite being flagged as a suicide risk following a reported attempt on July 23, 2019, Epstein was removed from suicide watch within 24 hours, based on questionable psychiatric evaluations. The lack of clear communication among MCC staff, inadequate staffing, and disregard for established policies created an environment where Epstein’s well-being was poorly monitored, setting the stage for the critical lapses that would lead to his death weeks later.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><br /><a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72805699</guid><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72805699/epsteinoigchapter2prt1.mp3" length="11491831" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7f219344-c6a3-4890-9d91-f9c9cf2194c5/7f219344-c6a3-4890-9d91-f9c9cf2194c5.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7f219344-c6a3-4890-9d91-f9c9cf2194c5/7f219344-c6a3-4890-9d91-f9c9cf2194c5.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7f219344-c6a3-4890-9d91-f9c9cf2194c5/7f219344-c6a3-4890-9d91-f9c9cf2194c5.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Chapter 2, Part 1 of the OIG report into Jeffrey Epstein’s death focuses on his initial detention and intake procedures at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York following his arrest on July 6, 2019. The report highlights significant...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Chapter 2, Part 1 of the OIG report into Jeffrey Epstein’s death focuses on his initial detention and intake procedures at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York following his arrest on July 6, 2019. The report highlights significant failures in classification, supervision, and mental health assessments, noting that Epstein was initially placed in general population despite being a high-profile inmate facing serious federal charges. After concerns were raised about his safety and the risk of extortion, he was transferred to the Special Housing Unit (SHU), where additional lapses in protocol occurred. The chapter details how MCC officials failed to follow standard procedures for high-risk detainees, including properly documenting Epstein’s mental health evaluations and conducting required welfare checks. Despite being flagged as a suicide risk following a reported attempt on July 23, 2019, Epstein was removed from suicide watch within 24 hours, based on questionable psychiatric evaluations. The lack of clear communication among MCC staff, inadequate staffing, and disregard for established policies created an environment where Epstein’s well-being was poorly monitored, setting the stage for the critical lapses that would lead to his death weeks later.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><br /><a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>719</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The OIG Report Into Jeffrey Epstein's Death: Introduction (Chapter 1)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-oig-report-into-jeffrey-epstein-s-death-introduction-chapter-1--72805697</link><description><![CDATA[The first chapter of the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s death provides a detailed overview of Epstein’s incarceration at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York and the circumstances leading up to his apparent suicide on August 10, 2019. The chapter outlines how Epstein, a high-profile detainee facing federal sex trafficking charges, was placed in the Special Housing Unit (SHU) due to concerns over his safety and flight risk. It details how, despite his notoriety and previous suicide attempt on July 23, 2019, MCC staff repeatedly failed to follow standard protocols, including not conducting required inmate checks and leaving him unsupervised for extended periods. The report highlights serious lapses in staffing, oversight, and communication, noting that Epstein should have remained on suicide watch but was downgraded to psychological observation without clear justification. Additionally, there were inconsistencies in records and video surveillance gaps, raising significant questions about the facility's handling of his confinement.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:  <br /><br /><br /><a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72805697</guid><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72805697/epsteinoigchapter1.mp3" length="19180608" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1ed51659-236a-4ab3-adbc-f87ae788f909/1ed51659-236a-4ab3-adbc-f87ae788f909.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1ed51659-236a-4ab3-adbc-f87ae788f909/1ed51659-236a-4ab3-adbc-f87ae788f909.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1ed51659-236a-4ab3-adbc-f87ae788f909/1ed51659-236a-4ab3-adbc-f87ae788f909.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The first chapter of the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s death provides a detailed overview of Epstein’s incarceration at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York and the circumstances leading up to...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The first chapter of the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s death provides a detailed overview of Epstein’s incarceration at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York and the circumstances leading up to his apparent suicide on August 10, 2019. The chapter outlines how Epstein, a high-profile detainee facing federal sex trafficking charges, was placed in the Special Housing Unit (SHU) due to concerns over his safety and flight risk. It details how, despite his notoriety and previous suicide attempt on July 23, 2019, MCC staff repeatedly failed to follow standard protocols, including not conducting required inmate checks and leaving him unsupervised for extended periods. The report highlights serious lapses in staffing, oversight, and communication, noting that Epstein should have remained on suicide watch but was downgraded to psychological observation without clear justification. Additionally, there were inconsistencies in records and video surveillance gaps, raising significant questions about the facility's handling of his confinement.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:  <br /><br /><br /><a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1199</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Bill Gates Epstein Related Congressional Transcripts (Part 14) (7/4/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-bill-gates-epstein-related-congressional-transcripts-part-14-7-4-26--72817018</link><description><![CDATA[<br />The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates testified that he met Epstein roughly 12 to 14 times between 2011 and 2014, saying he believed Epstein could help attract major philanthropic donations to global health initiatives through the Gates Foundation. He repeatedly described those meetings as "a mistake," insisted he never visited Epstein's private island, New Mexico ranch, or Florida residence, and said he never witnessed criminal conduct or participated in any of Epstein's illegal activities. Gates told lawmakers he ultimately concluded that Epstein had exaggerated both his financial connections and his ability to raise money for philanthropy.<br /><br /><br />One of the most closely watched portions of the transcript concerned allegations that Epstein sought to pressure Gates using knowledge of Gates' personal life. Gates acknowledged several extramarital affairs and testified that Epstein appeared to have learned about them, later making what Gates described as "veiled" attempts at blackmail by referencing those relationships and seeking money connected to one of the women. Gates said he believed Epstein "contemplated" blackmail but maintained he was never actually blackmailed, never paid Epstein to keep information secret, and never committed crimes with him. Throughout the interview, Gates emphasized that his association with Epstein damaged his judgment and reputation, expressed support for releasing the Epstein files and for continued investigations, and said survivors deserve justice while denying any involvement in Epstein's trafficking operation or abuse of minors.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72817018</guid><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72817018/gatestranscript14.mp3" length="12083244" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/018b4b4f-7c40-4e64-9dea-da052a7f9573/018b4b4f-7c40-4e64-9dea-da052a7f9573.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/018b4b4f-7c40-4e64-9dea-da052a7f9573/018b4b4f-7c40-4e64-9dea-da052a7f9573.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/018b4b4f-7c40-4e64-9dea-da052a7f9573/018b4b4f-7c40-4e64-9dea-da052a7f9573.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br />The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates testified that he met Epstein roughly 12 to 14 times between 2011 and 2014, saying he believed Epstein could help attract major philanthropic donations to global health initiatives through the Gates Foundation. He repeatedly described those meetings as "a mistake," insisted he never visited Epstein's private island, New Mexico ranch, or Florida residence, and said he never witnessed criminal conduct or participated in any of Epstein's illegal activities. Gates told lawmakers he ultimately concluded that Epstein had exaggerated both his financial connections and his ability to raise money for philanthropy.<br /><br /><br />One of the most closely watched portions of the transcript concerned allegations that Epstein sought to pressure Gates using knowledge of Gates' personal life. Gates acknowledged several extramarital affairs and testified that Epstein appeared to have learned about them, later making what Gates described as "veiled" attempts at blackmail by referencing those relationships and seeking money connected to one of the women. Gates said he believed Epstein "contemplated" blackmail but maintained he was never actually blackmailed, never paid Epstein to keep information secret, and never committed crimes with him. Throughout the interview, Gates emphasized that his association with Epstein damaged his judgment and reputation, expressed support for releasing the Epstein files and for continued investigations, and said survivors deserve justice while denying any involvement in Epstein's trafficking operation or abuse of minors.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>756</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Bill Gates Epstein Related Congressional Transcripts (Part 13) (7/4/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-bill-gates-epstein-related-congressional-transcripts-part-13-7-4-26--72817019</link><description><![CDATA[<br />The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates testified that he met Epstein roughly 12 to 14 times between 2011 and 2014, saying he believed Epstein could help attract major philanthropic donations to global health initiatives through the Gates Foundation. He repeatedly described those meetings as "a mistake," insisted he never visited Epstein's private island, New Mexico ranch, or Florida residence, and said he never witnessed criminal conduct or participated in any of Epstein's illegal activities. Gates told lawmakers he ultimately concluded that Epstein had exaggerated both his financial connections and his ability to raise money for philanthropy.<br /><br /><br />One of the most closely watched portions of the transcript concerned allegations that Epstein sought to pressure Gates using knowledge of Gates' personal life. Gates acknowledged several extramarital affairs and testified that Epstein appeared to have learned about them, later making what Gates described as "veiled" attempts at blackmail by referencing those relationships and seeking money connected to one of the women. Gates said he believed Epstein "contemplated" blackmail but maintained he was never actually blackmailed, never paid Epstein to keep information secret, and never committed crimes with him. Throughout the interview, Gates emphasized that his association with Epstein damaged his judgment and reputation, expressed support for releasing the Epstein files and for continued investigations, and said survivors deserve justice while denying any involvement in Epstein's trafficking operation or abuse of minors.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72817019</guid><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 18:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72817019/gatestranscript13.mp3" length="10531779" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/93d421db-fd82-4986-b06d-8649966a1a1d/93d421db-fd82-4986-b06d-8649966a1a1d.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/93d421db-fd82-4986-b06d-8649966a1a1d/93d421db-fd82-4986-b06d-8649966a1a1d.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/93d421db-fd82-4986-b06d-8649966a1a1d/93d421db-fd82-4986-b06d-8649966a1a1d.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br />The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates testified that he met Epstein roughly 12 to 14 times between 2011 and 2014, saying he believed Epstein could help attract major philanthropic donations to global health initiatives through the Gates Foundation. He repeatedly described those meetings as "a mistake," insisted he never visited Epstein's private island, New Mexico ranch, or Florida residence, and said he never witnessed criminal conduct or participated in any of Epstein's illegal activities. Gates told lawmakers he ultimately concluded that Epstein had exaggerated both his financial connections and his ability to raise money for philanthropy.<br /><br /><br />One of the most closely watched portions of the transcript concerned allegations that Epstein sought to pressure Gates using knowledge of Gates' personal life. Gates acknowledged several extramarital affairs and testified that Epstein appeared to have learned about them, later making what Gates described as "veiled" attempts at blackmail by referencing those relationships and seeking money connected to one of the women. Gates said he believed Epstein "contemplated" blackmail but maintained he was never actually blackmailed, never paid Epstein to keep information secret, and never committed crimes with him. Throughout the interview, Gates emphasized that his association with Epstein damaged his judgment and reputation, expressed support for releasing the Epstein files and for continued investigations, and said survivors deserve justice while denying any involvement in Epstein's trafficking operation or abuse of minors.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>659</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Bill Gates Epstein Related Congressional Transcripts (Part 12) (7/5/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-bill-gates-epstein-related-congressional-transcripts-part-12-7-5-26--72817014</link><description><![CDATA[<br />The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates testified that he met Epstein roughly 12 to 14 times between 2011 and 2014, saying he believed Epstein could help attract major philanthropic donations to global health initiatives through the Gates Foundation. He repeatedly described those meetings as "a mistake," insisted he never visited Epstein's private island, New Mexico ranch, or Florida residence, and said he never witnessed criminal conduct or participated in any of Epstein's illegal activities. Gates told lawmakers he ultimately concluded that Epstein had exaggerated both his financial connections and his ability to raise money for philanthropy.<br /><br /><br />One of the most closely watched portions of the transcript concerned allegations that Epstein sought to pressure Gates using knowledge of Gates' personal life. Gates acknowledged several extramarital affairs and testified that Epstein appeared to have learned about them, later making what Gates described as "veiled" attempts at blackmail by referencing those relationships and seeking money connected to one of the women. Gates said he believed Epstein "contemplated" blackmail but maintained he was never actually blackmailed, never paid Epstein to keep information secret, and never committed crimes with him. Throughout the interview, Gates emphasized that his association with Epstein damaged his judgment and reputation, expressed support for releasing the Epstein files and for continued investigations, and said survivors deserve justice while denying any involvement in Epstein's trafficking operation or abuse of minors.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72817014</guid><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72817014/gatestranscript12.mp3" length="11878026" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c47d84dd-1ddc-4e39-aab2-bbcf26ceb3a4/c47d84dd-1ddc-4e39-aab2-bbcf26ceb3a4.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c47d84dd-1ddc-4e39-aab2-bbcf26ceb3a4/c47d84dd-1ddc-4e39-aab2-bbcf26ceb3a4.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c47d84dd-1ddc-4e39-aab2-bbcf26ceb3a4/c47d84dd-1ddc-4e39-aab2-bbcf26ceb3a4.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br />The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates testified that he met Epstein roughly 12 to 14 times between 2011 and 2014, saying he believed Epstein could help attract major philanthropic donations to global health initiatives through the Gates Foundation. He repeatedly described those meetings as "a mistake," insisted he never visited Epstein's private island, New Mexico ranch, or Florida residence, and said he never witnessed criminal conduct or participated in any of Epstein's illegal activities. Gates told lawmakers he ultimately concluded that Epstein had exaggerated both his financial connections and his ability to raise money for philanthropy.<br /><br /><br />One of the most closely watched portions of the transcript concerned allegations that Epstein sought to pressure Gates using knowledge of Gates' personal life. Gates acknowledged several extramarital affairs and testified that Epstein appeared to have learned about them, later making what Gates described as "veiled" attempts at blackmail by referencing those relationships and seeking money connected to one of the women. Gates said he believed Epstein "contemplated" blackmail but maintained he was never actually blackmailed, never paid Epstein to keep information secret, and never committed crimes with him. Throughout the interview, Gates emphasized that his association with Epstein damaged his judgment and reputation, expressed support for releasing the Epstein files and for continued investigations, and said survivors deserve justice while denying any involvement in Epstein's trafficking operation or abuse of minors.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>743</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  James Comer And His Sham Of An Epstein Investigation (7/4/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-james-comer-and-his-sham-of-an-epstein-investigation-7-4-26--72806446</link><description><![CDATA[Critics have argued that the congressional investigation into Jeffrey Epstein being led by House Oversight Chairman James Comer and several Republican members of the committee has increasingly appeared shaped by political considerations rather than a consistent effort to uncover the full truth. According to these criticisms, the committee’s public messaging and investigative priorities often emphasize defending the Trump administration from scrutiny while directing attention toward other political targets. This approach, critics say, risks narrowing the scope of the inquiry and creates the perception that protecting political allies is being treated as a higher priority than pursuing a fully independent examination of Epstein’s network, the institutional failures that allowed it to operate, and the government’s handling of the case over multiple administrations.<br /><br /><br />The concern expressed by those critics is that an investigation driven by partisan calculations could undermine public confidence in the search for accountability. They argue that the Epstein scandal involves systemic failures across law enforcement, politics, finance, and elite institutions over many years, and that any credible investigation must be willing to examine uncomfortable facts regardless of which political figures may be implicated. By appearing to shield one administration while aggressively pursuing other narratives, the committee risks reinforcing the belief that congressional oversight has become another arena for political messaging rather than a neutral effort to establish a complete record of what happened and why so many warning signs surrounding Epstein were ignored.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72806446</guid><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72806446/megajamescomerrunningcoverfortrump.mp3" length="50186911" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3b07f4b5-7abb-4043-8424-e00deab9771a/3b07f4b5-7abb-4043-8424-e00deab9771a.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3b07f4b5-7abb-4043-8424-e00deab9771a/3b07f4b5-7abb-4043-8424-e00deab9771a.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3b07f4b5-7abb-4043-8424-e00deab9771a/3b07f4b5-7abb-4043-8424-e00deab9771a.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Critics have argued that the congressional investigation into Jeffrey Epstein being led by House Oversight Chairman James Comer and several Republican members of the committee has increasingly appeared shaped by political considerations rather than a...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Critics have argued that the congressional investigation into Jeffrey Epstein being led by House Oversight Chairman James Comer and several Republican members of the committee has increasingly appeared shaped by political considerations rather than a consistent effort to uncover the full truth. According to these criticisms, the committee’s public messaging and investigative priorities often emphasize defending the Trump administration from scrutiny while directing attention toward other political targets. This approach, critics say, risks narrowing the scope of the inquiry and creates the perception that protecting political allies is being treated as a higher priority than pursuing a fully independent examination of Epstein’s network, the institutional failures that allowed it to operate, and the government’s handling of the case over multiple administrations.<br /><br /><br />The concern expressed by those critics is that an investigation driven by partisan calculations could undermine public confidence in the search for accountability. They argue that the Epstein scandal involves systemic failures across law enforcement, politics, finance, and elite institutions over many years, and that any credible investigation must be willing to examine uncomfortable facts regardless of which political figures may be implicated. By appearing to shield one administration while aggressively pursuing other narratives, the committee risks reinforcing the belief that congressional oversight has become another arena for political messaging rather than a neutral effort to establish a complete record of what happened and why so many warning signs surrounding Epstein were ignored.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3137</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   Ghislaine Maxwell and her Request For Secrecy Is Denied (7/4/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-ghislaine-maxwell-and-her-request-for-secrecy-is-denied-7-4-26--72806445</link><description><![CDATA[Judge Nathan has handed team Maxwell yet another loss as she has ruled to not keep the jury selection process under seal and instead will open it to the press and public.<br /><br /><br /><br />To contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />Source:<br /><br /><br />https://abcnews.go.com/US/ghislaine-maxwells-attorneys-seek-private-screenings-potential-jurors/story?id=80687229<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72806445</guid><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72806445/megamaxwellsecrecyattrialprosecutorsoppose.mp3" length="33094500" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3702bc38-627b-4796-affa-d0d70be154a2/3702bc38-627b-4796-affa-d0d70be154a2.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3702bc38-627b-4796-affa-d0d70be154a2/3702bc38-627b-4796-affa-d0d70be154a2.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3702bc38-627b-4796-affa-d0d70be154a2/3702bc38-627b-4796-affa-d0d70be154a2.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Judge Nathan has handed team Maxwell yet another loss as she has ruled to not keep the jury selection process under seal and instead will open it to the press and public.



To contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



Source:...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Judge Nathan has handed team Maxwell yet another loss as she has ruled to not keep the jury selection process under seal and instead will open it to the press and public.<br /><br /><br /><br />To contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />Source:<br /><br /><br />https://abcnews.go.com/US/ghislaine-maxwells-attorneys-seek-private-screenings-potential-jurors/story?id=80687229<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2069</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Andrew Mountbatten Windsor And The Erasure Of Empathy (7/4/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-andrew-mountbatten-windsor-and-the-erasure-of-empathy-7-4-26--72806485</link><description><![CDATA[In recently surfaced reports, it was revealed that Prince Andrew personally deleted references to sexual abuse survivors from official palace statements drafted in the aftermath of the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. According to palace insiders, senior aides attempted to include lines acknowledging and expressing sympathy for the victims of Epstein’s crimes, but Andrew repeatedly struck those sections out before public release. His edits reportedly came at a time when the royal family was under immense scrutiny, and his actions were viewed internally as both tone-deaf and self-serving, reflecting his continued refusal to show genuine contrition or empathy.<br /><br />The revelations have reignited public anger and further cemented Andrew’s fall from grace. Royal commentators noted that his removal of those references symbolized how out of touch he remains, prioritizing his own reputation over compassion or accountability. This incident also underscores the divide between him and the rest of the royal family — particularly King Charles III — who later approved a statement explicitly expressing sympathy toward “the victims and survivors of any and all forms of abuse.” The move was interpreted as a deliberate correction and an implicit rebuke of Andrew’s earlier actions.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.thetimes.com/uk/royal-family/article/andrew-royal-news-jeffrey-epstein-victims-m89svml7c" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Andrew erased royal tributes to Jeffrey Epstein victims</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72806485</guid><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 10:30:01 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72806485/megaandrewerasureempathy.mp3" length="32333784" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5301d65a-7fd6-4262-8b75-11d2d0bf56f8/5301d65a-7fd6-4262-8b75-11d2d0bf56f8.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5301d65a-7fd6-4262-8b75-11d2d0bf56f8/5301d65a-7fd6-4262-8b75-11d2d0bf56f8.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5301d65a-7fd6-4262-8b75-11d2d0bf56f8/5301d65a-7fd6-4262-8b75-11d2d0bf56f8.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In recently surfaced reports, it was revealed that Prince Andrew personally deleted references to sexual abuse survivors from official palace statements drafted in the aftermath of the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. According to palace insiders, senior...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In recently surfaced reports, it was revealed that Prince Andrew personally deleted references to sexual abuse survivors from official palace statements drafted in the aftermath of the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. According to palace insiders, senior aides attempted to include lines acknowledging and expressing sympathy for the victims of Epstein’s crimes, but Andrew repeatedly struck those sections out before public release. His edits reportedly came at a time when the royal family was under immense scrutiny, and his actions were viewed internally as both tone-deaf and self-serving, reflecting his continued refusal to show genuine contrition or empathy.<br /><br />The revelations have reignited public anger and further cemented Andrew’s fall from grace. Royal commentators noted that his removal of those references symbolized how out of touch he remains, prioritizing his own reputation over compassion or accountability. This incident also underscores the divide between him and the rest of the royal family — particularly King Charles III — who later approved a statement explicitly expressing sympathy toward “the victims and survivors of any and all forms of abuse.” The move was interpreted as a deliberate correction and an implicit rebuke of Andrew’s earlier actions.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.thetimes.com/uk/royal-family/article/andrew-royal-news-jeffrey-epstein-victims-m89svml7c" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Andrew erased royal tributes to Jeffrey Epstein victims</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2021</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The Education of Jeffrey Epstein in Secrets and Shadows (7/4/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-education-of-jeffrey-epstein-in-secrets-and-shadows-7-4-26--72806486</link><description><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein’s story doesn’t begin with the penthouse, the island, or the mugshot—it begins in the shadows of the Cold War. In the 1980s, he worked as a financial adviser for Saudi arms dealer Adnan Khashoggi, a man entangled in the Iran–Contra scandal and the massive Al-Yamamah arms deal. Through Khashoggi, British defense contractor Douglas Leese, and financier Steven Hoffenberg, Epstein was introduced to a world where money moved invisibly, arms were traded for oil, and intelligence agencies relied on businessmen as covert intermediaries. These early associations taught him the culture of power: secrets were currency, crimes could be reframed as strategy, and the right connections offered protection from the law.<br /><br />Epstein didn’t invent this playbook—he adapted it. Where Khashoggi traded weapons and oil, Epstein traded access and leverage, turning young victims into bargaining chips in a network of elites. His empire mirrored the same operating principles he absorbed in the 1980s: plausible deniability, hidden money flows, and the insulation of power. This is why his story is more than personal depravity—it’s proof that the system itself breeds and shields men like him. Epstein wasn’t a glitch in the matrix. He was the proof that it works, and the machinery that built him is still running, still producing new Epsteins, waiting for their turn in the spotlight.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72806486</guid><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72806486/megafromriyadhtowallstreet.mp3" length="22903789" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/925e9b75-7471-4722-b79b-186b386a19f4/925e9b75-7471-4722-b79b-186b386a19f4.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/925e9b75-7471-4722-b79b-186b386a19f4/925e9b75-7471-4722-b79b-186b386a19f4.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/925e9b75-7471-4722-b79b-186b386a19f4/925e9b75-7471-4722-b79b-186b386a19f4.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jeffrey Epstein’s story doesn’t begin with the penthouse, the island, or the mugshot—it begins in the shadows of the Cold War. In the 1980s, he worked as a financial adviser for Saudi arms dealer Adnan Khashoggi, a man entangled in the Iran–Contra...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein’s story doesn’t begin with the penthouse, the island, or the mugshot—it begins in the shadows of the Cold War. In the 1980s, he worked as a financial adviser for Saudi arms dealer Adnan Khashoggi, a man entangled in the Iran–Contra scandal and the massive Al-Yamamah arms deal. Through Khashoggi, British defense contractor Douglas Leese, and financier Steven Hoffenberg, Epstein was introduced to a world where money moved invisibly, arms were traded for oil, and intelligence agencies relied on businessmen as covert intermediaries. These early associations taught him the culture of power: secrets were currency, crimes could be reframed as strategy, and the right connections offered protection from the law.<br /><br />Epstein didn’t invent this playbook—he adapted it. Where Khashoggi traded weapons and oil, Epstein traded access and leverage, turning young victims into bargaining chips in a network of elites. His empire mirrored the same operating principles he absorbed in the 1980s: plausible deniability, hidden money flows, and the insulation of power. This is why his story is more than personal depravity—it’s proof that the system itself breeds and shields men like him. Epstein wasn’t a glitch in the matrix. He was the proof that it works, and the machinery that built him is still running, still producing new Epsteins, waiting for their turn in the spotlight.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1432</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  US Congress And Their Bipolar Approach To The Jeffrey Epstein Scandal (7/3/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-us-congress-and-their-bipolar-approach-to-the-jeffrey-epstein-scandal-7-3-26--72717119</link><description><![CDATA[The congressional investigation into Jeffrey Epstein has increasingly taken on the appearance of political theater rather than a disciplined effort to uncover the full scope of Epstein’s trafficking network. What began as a bipartisan promise to bring transparency to one of the most disturbing criminal cases in modern history has gradually devolved into a spectacle marked by partisan grandstanding, media soundbites, and chaotic hearings. Members of Congress have spent as much time arguing with one another and chasing headlines as they have examining the mountain of evidence tied to Epstein’s operation. Witness lists have shifted unpredictably, subpoenas have been issued and contested in dramatic fashion, and committee members have often used hearings as opportunities to score political points rather than pursue methodical investigative work. The result has been an investigation that frequently looks less like a serious congressional probe and more like a stage for political performance.<br /><br />Critics argue that this circus-like atmosphere has undermined the credibility of the investigation and distracted from the core question of accountability for Epstein’s crimes and the network that enabled him. Rather than presenting a unified effort to follow the evidence wherever it leads, the investigation has been plagued by conflicting narratives, procedural disputes, and public confrontations that generate headlines but little clarity. Victims’ advocates and transparency groups have expressed frustration that the focus often drifts toward political drama instead of the systemic failures that allowed Epstein to operate for years. The chaotic nature of the hearings has also given skeptics ammunition to dismiss the entire process as partisan infighting rather than a legitimate search for truth. In the end, the spectacle threatens to obscure the very purpose of the investigation: establishing how Epstein’s trafficking operation persisted for so long and why so many institutions failed to stop it.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72717119</guid><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 06:30:01 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72717119/megacongressgrandstanding.mp3" length="40801219" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a8fad6f0-3d6d-42b3-a027-ec3ad1409674/a8fad6f0-3d6d-42b3-a027-ec3ad1409674.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a8fad6f0-3d6d-42b3-a027-ec3ad1409674/a8fad6f0-3d6d-42b3-a027-ec3ad1409674.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a8fad6f0-3d6d-42b3-a027-ec3ad1409674/a8fad6f0-3d6d-42b3-a027-ec3ad1409674.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The congressional investigation into Jeffrey Epstein has increasingly taken on the appearance of political theater rather than a disciplined effort to uncover the full scope of Epstein’s trafficking network. What began as a bipartisan promise to bring...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The congressional investigation into Jeffrey Epstein has increasingly taken on the appearance of political theater rather than a disciplined effort to uncover the full scope of Epstein’s trafficking network. What began as a bipartisan promise to bring transparency to one of the most disturbing criminal cases in modern history has gradually devolved into a spectacle marked by partisan grandstanding, media soundbites, and chaotic hearings. Members of Congress have spent as much time arguing with one another and chasing headlines as they have examining the mountain of evidence tied to Epstein’s operation. Witness lists have shifted unpredictably, subpoenas have been issued and contested in dramatic fashion, and committee members have often used hearings as opportunities to score political points rather than pursue methodical investigative work. The result has been an investigation that frequently looks less like a serious congressional probe and more like a stage for political performance.<br /><br />Critics argue that this circus-like atmosphere has undermined the credibility of the investigation and distracted from the core question of accountability for Epstein’s crimes and the network that enabled him. Rather than presenting a unified effort to follow the evidence wherever it leads, the investigation has been plagued by conflicting narratives, procedural disputes, and public confrontations that generate headlines but little clarity. Victims’ advocates and transparency groups have expressed frustration that the focus often drifts toward political drama instead of the systemic failures that allowed Epstein to operate for years. The chaotic nature of the hearings has also given skeptics ammunition to dismiss the entire process as partisan infighting rather than a legitimate search for truth. In the end, the spectacle threatens to obscure the very purpose of the investigation: establishing how Epstein’s trafficking operation persisted for so long and why so many institutions failed to stop it.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2551</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Inside The OIG Interview:  The Testimony Of An Unnamed MCC Lieutenant (Part 15)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/inside-the-oig-interview-the-testimony-of-an-unnamed-mcc-lieutenant-part-15--72764203</link><description><![CDATA[The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command responsibilities, and awareness of Epstein’s status—the lieutenant repeatedly falls back on vague answers, limited recollection, or an inability to provide specifics. This pattern isn’t occasional—it’s consistent, especially on the exact points where clarity matters most. Rather than offering firm timelines or accountability, the testimony often drifts into generalities, creating the impression that either key information was not retained or not being fully disclosed.<br /><br />That evasiveness becomes even more glaring when discussing the hours leading up to and immediately following Epstein’s death. Questions about whether protocols were followed, who was responsible for monitoring, and how breakdowns occurred are met with uncertainty or deflection, leaving major gaps in the narrative. Instead of clarifying what went wrong, the testimony reinforces the sense of confusion and lack of oversight already seen in other MCC accounts. The result is a record that feels less like a clear explanation and more like a fragmented, incomplete account—one that raises as many questions about credibility and accountability as it answers about the failures inside the facility.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00062649.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00062649.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72764203</guid><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72764203/mccoiglieutenant15.mp3" length="13919756" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a5da3b50-84a4-463b-965a-cce5812ca22b/a5da3b50-84a4-463b-965a-cce5812ca22b.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a5da3b50-84a4-463b-965a-cce5812ca22b/a5da3b50-84a4-463b-965a-cce5812ca22b.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a5da3b50-84a4-463b-965a-cce5812ca22b/a5da3b50-84a4-463b-965a-cce5812ca22b.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command responsibilities, and awareness of Epstein’s status—the lieutenant repeatedly falls back on vague answers, limited recollection, or an inability to provide specifics. This pattern isn’t occasional—it’s consistent, especially on the exact points where clarity matters most. Rather than offering firm timelines or accountability, the testimony often drifts into generalities, creating the impression that either key information was not retained or not being fully disclosed.<br /><br />That evasiveness becomes even more glaring when discussing the hours leading up to and immediately following Epstein’s death. Questions about whether protocols were followed, who was responsible for monitoring, and how breakdowns occurred are met with uncertainty or deflection, leaving major gaps in the narrative. Instead of clarifying what went wrong, the testimony reinforces the sense of confusion and lack of oversight already seen in other MCC accounts. The result is a record that feels less like a clear explanation and more like a fragmented, incomplete account—one that raises as many questions about credibility and accountability as it answers about the failures inside the facility.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00062649.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00062649.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>870</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Inside The OIG Interview:  The Testimony Of An Unnamed MCC Lieutenant (Part 14)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/inside-the-oig-interview-the-testimony-of-an-unnamed-mcc-lieutenant-part-14--72764205</link><description><![CDATA[The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command responsibilities, and awareness of Epstein’s status—the lieutenant repeatedly falls back on vague answers, limited recollection, or an inability to provide specifics. This pattern isn’t occasional—it’s consistent, especially on the exact points where clarity matters most. Rather than offering firm timelines or accountability, the testimony often drifts into generalities, creating the impression that either key information was not retained or not being fully disclosed.<br /><br />That evasiveness becomes even more glaring when discussing the hours leading up to and immediately following Epstein’s death. Questions about whether protocols were followed, who was responsible for monitoring, and how breakdowns occurred are met with uncertainty or deflection, leaving major gaps in the narrative. Instead of clarifying what went wrong, the testimony reinforces the sense of confusion and lack of oversight already seen in other MCC accounts. The result is a record that feels less like a clear explanation and more like a fragmented, incomplete account—one that raises as many questions about credibility and accountability as it answers about the failures inside the facility.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00062649.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00062649.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72764205</guid><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72764205/mccoiglieutenant14.mp3" length="13813595" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c06a9878-4e9c-41fd-ac9a-0df7917f2dc6/c06a9878-4e9c-41fd-ac9a-0df7917f2dc6.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c06a9878-4e9c-41fd-ac9a-0df7917f2dc6/c06a9878-4e9c-41fd-ac9a-0df7917f2dc6.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c06a9878-4e9c-41fd-ac9a-0df7917f2dc6/c06a9878-4e9c-41fd-ac9a-0df7917f2dc6.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command responsibilities, and awareness of Epstein’s status—the lieutenant repeatedly falls back on vague answers, limited recollection, or an inability to provide specifics. This pattern isn’t occasional—it’s consistent, especially on the exact points where clarity matters most. Rather than offering firm timelines or accountability, the testimony often drifts into generalities, creating the impression that either key information was not retained or not being fully disclosed.<br /><br />That evasiveness becomes even more glaring when discussing the hours leading up to and immediately following Epstein’s death. Questions about whether protocols were followed, who was responsible for monitoring, and how breakdowns occurred are met with uncertainty or deflection, leaving major gaps in the narrative. Instead of clarifying what went wrong, the testimony reinforces the sense of confusion and lack of oversight already seen in other MCC accounts. The result is a record that feels less like a clear explanation and more like a fragmented, incomplete account—one that raises as many questions about credibility and accountability as it answers about the failures inside the facility.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00062649.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00062649.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>864</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Inside The OIG Interview:  The Testimony Of An Unnamed MCC Lieutenant (Part 13)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/inside-the-oig-interview-the-testimony-of-an-unnamed-mcc-lieutenant-part-13--72764204</link><description><![CDATA[The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command responsibilities, and awareness of Epstein’s status—the lieutenant repeatedly falls back on vague answers, limited recollection, or an inability to provide specifics. This pattern isn’t occasional—it’s consistent, especially on the exact points where clarity matters most. Rather than offering firm timelines or accountability, the testimony often drifts into generalities, creating the impression that either key information was not retained or not being fully disclosed.<br /><br />That evasiveness becomes even more glaring when discussing the hours leading up to and immediately following Epstein’s death. Questions about whether protocols were followed, who was responsible for monitoring, and how breakdowns occurred are met with uncertainty or deflection, leaving major gaps in the narrative. Instead of clarifying what went wrong, the testimony reinforces the sense of confusion and lack of oversight already seen in other MCC accounts. The result is a record that feels less like a clear explanation and more like a fragmented, incomplete account—one that raises as many questions about credibility and accountability as it answers about the failures inside the facility.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00062649.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00062649.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72764204</guid><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 00:30:01 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72764204/mccoiglieutenant13.mp3" length="12983946" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3095839a-fd7a-4d4a-88ff-ffccb0c8d67c/3095839a-fd7a-4d4a-88ff-ffccb0c8d67c.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3095839a-fd7a-4d4a-88ff-ffccb0c8d67c/3095839a-fd7a-4d4a-88ff-ffccb0c8d67c.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3095839a-fd7a-4d4a-88ff-ffccb0c8d67c/3095839a-fd7a-4d4a-88ff-ffccb0c8d67c.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command responsibilities, and awareness of Epstein’s status—the lieutenant repeatedly falls back on vague answers, limited recollection, or an inability to provide specifics. This pattern isn’t occasional—it’s consistent, especially on the exact points where clarity matters most. Rather than offering firm timelines or accountability, the testimony often drifts into generalities, creating the impression that either key information was not retained or not being fully disclosed.<br /><br />That evasiveness becomes even more glaring when discussing the hours leading up to and immediately following Epstein’s death. Questions about whether protocols were followed, who was responsible for monitoring, and how breakdowns occurred are met with uncertainty or deflection, leaving major gaps in the narrative. Instead of clarifying what went wrong, the testimony reinforces the sense of confusion and lack of oversight already seen in other MCC accounts. The result is a record that feels less like a clear explanation and more like a fragmented, incomplete account—one that raises as many questions about credibility and accountability as it answers about the failures inside the facility.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00062649.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00062649.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>812</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Inside The OIG Interview:  The Testimony Of An Unnamed MCC Lieutenant (Part 12)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/inside-the-oig-interview-the-testimony-of-an-unnamed-mcc-lieutenant-part-12--72764208</link><description><![CDATA[The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command responsibilities, and awareness of Epstein’s status—the lieutenant repeatedly falls back on vague answers, limited recollection, or an inability to provide specifics. This pattern isn’t occasional—it’s consistent, especially on the exact points where clarity matters most. Rather than offering firm timelines or accountability, the testimony often drifts into generalities, creating the impression that either key information was not retained or not being fully disclosed.<br /><br />That evasiveness becomes even more glaring when discussing the hours leading up to and immediately following Epstein’s death. Questions about whether protocols were followed, who was responsible for monitoring, and how breakdowns occurred are met with uncertainty or deflection, leaving major gaps in the narrative. Instead of clarifying what went wrong, the testimony reinforces the sense of confusion and lack of oversight already seen in other MCC accounts. The result is a record that feels less like a clear explanation and more like a fragmented, incomplete account—one that raises as many questions about credibility and accountability as it answers about the failures inside the facility.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00062649.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00062649.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72764208</guid><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72764208/mccoiglieutenant12.mp3" length="17676791" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/15741dcc-2461-4296-a8ff-7a1fb1caabd3/15741dcc-2461-4296-a8ff-7a1fb1caabd3.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/15741dcc-2461-4296-a8ff-7a1fb1caabd3/15741dcc-2461-4296-a8ff-7a1fb1caabd3.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/15741dcc-2461-4296-a8ff-7a1fb1caabd3/15741dcc-2461-4296-a8ff-7a1fb1caabd3.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command responsibilities, and awareness of Epstein’s status—the lieutenant repeatedly falls back on vague answers, limited recollection, or an inability to provide specifics. This pattern isn’t occasional—it’s consistent, especially on the exact points where clarity matters most. Rather than offering firm timelines or accountability, the testimony often drifts into generalities, creating the impression that either key information was not retained or not being fully disclosed.<br /><br />That evasiveness becomes even more glaring when discussing the hours leading up to and immediately following Epstein’s death. Questions about whether protocols were followed, who was responsible for monitoring, and how breakdowns occurred are met with uncertainty or deflection, leaving major gaps in the narrative. Instead of clarifying what went wrong, the testimony reinforces the sense of confusion and lack of oversight already seen in other MCC accounts. The result is a record that feels less like a clear explanation and more like a fragmented, incomplete account—one that raises as many questions about credibility and accountability as it answers about the failures inside the facility.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00062649.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00062649.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1105</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Bill Gates Epstein Related Congressional Transcripts (Part 11) (7/3/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-bill-gates-epstein-related-congressional-transcripts-part-11-7-3-26--72796624</link><description><![CDATA[<br />The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates testified that he met Epstein roughly 12 to 14 times between 2011 and 2014, saying he believed Epstein could help attract major philanthropic donations to global health initiatives through the Gates Foundation. He repeatedly described those meetings as "a mistake," insisted he never visited Epstein's private island, New Mexico ranch, or Florida residence, and said he never witnessed criminal conduct or participated in any of Epstein's illegal activities. Gates told lawmakers he ultimately concluded that Epstein had exaggerated both his financial connections and his ability to raise money for philanthropy.<br /><br /><br />One of the most closely watched portions of the transcript concerned allegations that Epstein sought to pressure Gates using knowledge of Gates' personal life. Gates acknowledged several extramarital affairs and testified that Epstein appeared to have learned about them, later making what Gates described as "veiled" attempts at blackmail by referencing those relationships and seeking money connected to one of the women. Gates said he believed Epstein "contemplated" blackmail but maintained he was never actually blackmailed, never paid Epstein to keep information secret, and never committed crimes with him. Throughout the interview, Gates emphasized that his association with Epstein damaged his judgment and reputation, expressed support for releasing the Epstein files and for continued investigations, and said survivors deserve justice while denying any involvement in Epstein's trafficking operation or abuse of minors.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72796624</guid><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72796624/gatestranscript11.mp3" length="12122950" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1231d356-a5f0-456f-bca5-4762b7441b5f/1231d356-a5f0-456f-bca5-4762b7441b5f.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1231d356-a5f0-456f-bca5-4762b7441b5f/1231d356-a5f0-456f-bca5-4762b7441b5f.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1231d356-a5f0-456f-bca5-4762b7441b5f/1231d356-a5f0-456f-bca5-4762b7441b5f.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br />The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates testified that he met Epstein roughly 12 to 14 times between 2011 and 2014, saying he believed Epstein could help attract major philanthropic donations to global health initiatives through the Gates Foundation. He repeatedly described those meetings as "a mistake," insisted he never visited Epstein's private island, New Mexico ranch, or Florida residence, and said he never witnessed criminal conduct or participated in any of Epstein's illegal activities. Gates told lawmakers he ultimately concluded that Epstein had exaggerated both his financial connections and his ability to raise money for philanthropy.<br /><br /><br />One of the most closely watched portions of the transcript concerned allegations that Epstein sought to pressure Gates using knowledge of Gates' personal life. Gates acknowledged several extramarital affairs and testified that Epstein appeared to have learned about them, later making what Gates described as "veiled" attempts at blackmail by referencing those relationships and seeking money connected to one of the women. Gates said he believed Epstein "contemplated" blackmail but maintained he was never actually blackmailed, never paid Epstein to keep information secret, and never committed crimes with him. Throughout the interview, Gates emphasized that his association with Epstein damaged his judgment and reputation, expressed support for releasing the Epstein files and for continued investigations, and said survivors deserve justice while denying any involvement in Epstein's trafficking operation or abuse of minors.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>758</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Paper Trail Begins: New Mexico's Epstein Truth Commission Receives Subpoenaed Records (7/3/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-paper-trail-begins-new-mexico-s-epstein-truth-commission-receives-subpoenaed-records-7-3-26--72796618</link><description><![CDATA[Subpoenaed records have now begun arriving for New Mexico’s Epstein Truth Commission, marking the point where the investigation moves from public promises and subpoena announcements into actual document review. The commission was created to investigate Jeffrey Epstein’s activities at Zorro Ranch near Stanley, New Mexico, and to examine the institutional failures that allowed alleged abuse and trafficking connected to the ranch to go unanswered for decades. The commission has subpoena power, a $2 million budget, and a mandate to look at law enforcement inaction, financial ties, government records, and who may have known about or enabled Epstein’s conduct in New Mexico.<br /><br />The records being sought include material from state agencies, law enforcement, financial institutions, Epstein-linked entities, and organizations with ties to him, including the Santa Fe Institute. Earlier subpoena batches targeted records involving Zorro Ranch, Epstein’s estate, the FBI, DOJ, U.S. Attorney’s offices, Deutsche Bank, JPMorgan Chase, New Mexico agencies, the governor’s office, the State Land Office, the Santa Fe County Sheriff’s Office, and others. The significance is that this could finally force a paper trail into the open: real estate records, police reports, investigative files, correspondence, donations, financial transactions, and communications tied to Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. For survivors, the key question is still whether this commission will expose why New Mexico was treated like an afterthought for so long, despite years of allegations surrounding Zorro Ranch.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.santafenewmexican.com/news/local_news/subpoenaed-materials-start-flowing-to-epstein-truth-commission/article_89b3e8c4-aa9c-45de-98de-0e6ff86b1f42.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Subpoenaed materials start flowing to Epstein 'truth commission' | Local News | santafenewmexican.com</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72796618</guid><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 18:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72796618/nmtruthcomissionrecievessubpoenas.mp3" length="12267146" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/786e54a0-2a29-4b89-be01-50e9085ff00b/786e54a0-2a29-4b89-be01-50e9085ff00b.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/786e54a0-2a29-4b89-be01-50e9085ff00b/786e54a0-2a29-4b89-be01-50e9085ff00b.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/786e54a0-2a29-4b89-be01-50e9085ff00b/786e54a0-2a29-4b89-be01-50e9085ff00b.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Subpoenaed records have now begun arriving for New Mexico’s Epstein Truth Commission, marking the point where the investigation moves from public promises and subpoena announcements into actual document review. The commission was created to...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Subpoenaed records have now begun arriving for New Mexico’s Epstein Truth Commission, marking the point where the investigation moves from public promises and subpoena announcements into actual document review. The commission was created to investigate Jeffrey Epstein’s activities at Zorro Ranch near Stanley, New Mexico, and to examine the institutional failures that allowed alleged abuse and trafficking connected to the ranch to go unanswered for decades. The commission has subpoena power, a $2 million budget, and a mandate to look at law enforcement inaction, financial ties, government records, and who may have known about or enabled Epstein’s conduct in New Mexico.<br /><br />The records being sought include material from state agencies, law enforcement, financial institutions, Epstein-linked entities, and organizations with ties to him, including the Santa Fe Institute. Earlier subpoena batches targeted records involving Zorro Ranch, Epstein’s estate, the FBI, DOJ, U.S. Attorney’s offices, Deutsche Bank, JPMorgan Chase, New Mexico agencies, the governor’s office, the State Land Office, the Santa Fe County Sheriff’s Office, and others. The significance is that this could finally force a paper trail into the open: real estate records, police reports, investigative files, correspondence, donations, financial transactions, and communications tied to Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. For survivors, the key question is still whether this commission will expose why New Mexico was treated like an afterthought for so long, despite years of allegations surrounding Zorro Ranch.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.santafenewmexican.com/news/local_news/subpoenaed-materials-start-flowing-to-epstein-truth-commission/article_89b3e8c4-aa9c-45de-98de-0e6ff86b1f42.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Subpoenaed materials start flowing to Epstein 'truth commission' | Local News | santafenewmexican.com</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>767</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Russian Intelligence Allegations Now Haunting Peter Mandelson (7/3/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-russian-intelligence-allegations-now-haunting-peter-mandelson-7-3-26--72796614</link><description><![CDATA[A leaked dossier known as Project Fish reportedly claims that Lord Peter Mandelson was viewed by Russian intelligence as a “privileged contact” for more than three decades, beginning around the time he served as Labour’s director of communications in the late 1980s and early 1990s. The dossier, reportedly compiled by a former British intelligence officer with knowledge of Russian operations, alleges that Mandelson was considered one of Russia’s most significant influence opportunities inside British politics. The claims are explosive, but the reporting also makes clear that there is no concrete public evidence proving Mandelson acted as a Russian agent or betrayed Britain on Moscow’s behalf. People close to Mandelson have dismissed the allegations as “nonsense” and deny that he ever acted improperly for Russia.<br /><br />The dossier also ties the Russia allegation to Mandelson’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, suggesting that Epstein’s connection to Mandelson may have created leverage or intelligence value for Russian services. That is where the story becomes especially sensitive: Mandelson has already faced scrutiny over his Epstein ties, including separate reporting that he allegedly forwarded confidential UK government information to Epstein during the financial crisis, prompting calls for investigations and questions about his judgment. But the Russia dossier itself appears contested, and critics have raised doubts about its credibility, with one Russia-focused commentator describing the allegations as implausible and resembling “news-cycle adjacent fantasies.” So the heart of the story is not that Mandelson has been proven to be a Russian asset, but that a leaked intelligence-style dossier is now adding another layer of suspicion to an already toxic record of access, judgment, Epstein proximity, and elite political vulnerability.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/leaked-dossier-lord-mandelson-russian-intelligence-1806368" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lord Peter Mandelson is Russia's 'Privilege Contact,' According to Leaked Dossier | IBTimes UK</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72796614</guid><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72796614/mandelsonrussianasset.mp3" length="11078470" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/852ea9c8-4532-4ef3-b3a6-14a9294839dc/852ea9c8-4532-4ef3-b3a6-14a9294839dc.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/852ea9c8-4532-4ef3-b3a6-14a9294839dc/852ea9c8-4532-4ef3-b3a6-14a9294839dc.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/852ea9c8-4532-4ef3-b3a6-14a9294839dc/852ea9c8-4532-4ef3-b3a6-14a9294839dc.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A leaked dossier known as Project Fish reportedly claims that Lord Peter Mandelson was viewed by Russian intelligence as a “privileged contact” for more than three decades, beginning around the time he served as Labour’s director of communications in...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A leaked dossier known as Project Fish reportedly claims that Lord Peter Mandelson was viewed by Russian intelligence as a “privileged contact” for more than three decades, beginning around the time he served as Labour’s director of communications in the late 1980s and early 1990s. The dossier, reportedly compiled by a former British intelligence officer with knowledge of Russian operations, alleges that Mandelson was considered one of Russia’s most significant influence opportunities inside British politics. The claims are explosive, but the reporting also makes clear that there is no concrete public evidence proving Mandelson acted as a Russian agent or betrayed Britain on Moscow’s behalf. People close to Mandelson have dismissed the allegations as “nonsense” and deny that he ever acted improperly for Russia.<br /><br />The dossier also ties the Russia allegation to Mandelson’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, suggesting that Epstein’s connection to Mandelson may have created leverage or intelligence value for Russian services. That is where the story becomes especially sensitive: Mandelson has already faced scrutiny over his Epstein ties, including separate reporting that he allegedly forwarded confidential UK government information to Epstein during the financial crisis, prompting calls for investigations and questions about his judgment. But the Russia dossier itself appears contested, and critics have raised doubts about its credibility, with one Russia-focused commentator describing the allegations as implausible and resembling “news-cycle adjacent fantasies.” So the heart of the story is not that Mandelson has been proven to be a Russian asset, but that a leaked intelligence-style dossier is now adding another layer of suspicion to an already toxic record of access, judgment, Epstein proximity, and elite political vulnerability.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/leaked-dossier-lord-mandelson-russian-intelligence-1806368" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lord Peter Mandelson is Russia's 'Privilege Contact,' According to Leaked Dossier | IBTimes UK</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>693</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Ghislaine Maxwell Transfer and the Politics of Prison Privilege (7/3/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-ghislaine-maxwell-transfer-and-the-politics-of-prison-privilege-7-3-26--72796615</link><description><![CDATA[The Bureau of Prisons’ claim that Ghislaine Maxwell was moved from Tallahassee to Texas for “security reasons” is presented as another vague, insulting explanation in a long line of Epstein-related evasions. The argument is that the phrase does not explain what kind of security issue existed, why the solution was a move to a less restrictive minimum-security camp, who approved it, or how the decision squared with BOP classification rules, sentence length, offense conduct, custody scoring, transfer protocols, and ordinary treatment of federal inmates. Instead of calming suspicion, the lack of detail makes the transfer look like special handling, especially given Maxwell’s conviction, what she may know about Epstein’s network, and the timing of renewed federal attention around her.<br /><br />The broader point is that the government has forfeited trust through years of secrecy, redactions, closed-door processes, weak explanations, and institutional failures connected to Epstein, including the non-prosecution agreement, victim-notification failures, sweetheart treatment, and Epstein’s death in federal custody. The transfer is framed as another example of the same pattern: power protecting power while survivors and the public are told to accept process instead of truth. The piece argues that Congress should demand the transfer packet, custody scoring, approval chain, waivers, management variables, and communications between BOP and DOJ officials. Until those documents are produced, the move should be treated not as routine prison administration but as another suspicious act of preferential treatment in a case already defined by evasion and coverup.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72796615</guid><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72796615/maxtransfernoanswers.mp3" length="17604066" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cdba4c2f-54c1-445d-b642-6ecf6df53331/cdba4c2f-54c1-445d-b642-6ecf6df53331.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cdba4c2f-54c1-445d-b642-6ecf6df53331/cdba4c2f-54c1-445d-b642-6ecf6df53331.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cdba4c2f-54c1-445d-b642-6ecf6df53331/cdba4c2f-54c1-445d-b642-6ecf6df53331.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Bureau of Prisons’ claim that Ghislaine Maxwell was moved from Tallahassee to Texas for “security reasons” is presented as another vague, insulting explanation in a long line of Epstein-related evasions. The argument is that the phrase does not...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Bureau of Prisons’ claim that Ghislaine Maxwell was moved from Tallahassee to Texas for “security reasons” is presented as another vague, insulting explanation in a long line of Epstein-related evasions. The argument is that the phrase does not explain what kind of security issue existed, why the solution was a move to a less restrictive minimum-security camp, who approved it, or how the decision squared with BOP classification rules, sentence length, offense conduct, custody scoring, transfer protocols, and ordinary treatment of federal inmates. Instead of calming suspicion, the lack of detail makes the transfer look like special handling, especially given Maxwell’s conviction, what she may know about Epstein’s network, and the timing of renewed federal attention around her.<br /><br />The broader point is that the government has forfeited trust through years of secrecy, redactions, closed-door processes, weak explanations, and institutional failures connected to Epstein, including the non-prosecution agreement, victim-notification failures, sweetheart treatment, and Epstein’s death in federal custody. The transfer is framed as another example of the same pattern: power protecting power while survivors and the public are told to accept process instead of truth. The piece argues that Congress should demand the transfer packet, custody scoring, approval chain, waivers, management variables, and communications between BOP and DOJ officials. Until those documents are produced, the move should be treated not as routine prison administration but as another suspicious act of preferential treatment in a case already defined by evasion and coverup.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1101</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Jeffrey Epstein's Time At MCC And The Quiet Retirement Of The Warden (7/3/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-s-time-at-mcc-and-the-quiet-retirement-of-the-warden-7-3-26--72792692</link><description><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein’s time at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in Manhattan was marked by extraordinary irregularities that immediately set his detention apart from that of ordinary federal inmates. After his July 2019 arrest on federal sex trafficking charges, Epstein was placed in the Special Housing Unit, officially for his own protection, but the conditions of that confinement were riddled with contradictions. He was housed in a unit that was understaffed, plagued by malfunctioning cameras, and run by a Bureau of Prisons already under scrutiny for mismanagement. Despite being classified as a high-risk inmate due to the seriousness of the charges, his wealth, and the potential exposure of powerful associates, Epstein was repeatedly removed from standard suicide watch protocols. He was briefly placed on suicide watch after being found injured in his cell in late July, then taken off it under circumstances that were never convincingly explained, returning to a unit where basic safeguards were visibly failing.<br /><br />The failures at MCC culminated in Epstein’s death on August 10, 2019, when he was found unresponsive in his cell, officially ruled a suicide by hanging. On the night of his death, guards assigned to check on him allegedly fell asleep and failed to perform required welfare checks, while security cameras outside his cell were either broken or produced unusable footage. His cellmate had been transferred out shortly before his death, leaving Epstein alone despite prior concerns about self-harm. The combination of staffing shortages, ignored protocols, missing or nonfunctional surveillance, and a pattern of administrative negligence created a perfect storm that has fueled widespread skepticism about the official narrative. Epstein’s death at MCC did not close the case; instead, it intensified public distrust in the federal prison system and reinforced the perception that even in custody, Epstein remained surrounded by institutional failure and unanswered questions.<br /><br /><br />The warden in charge of the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) at the time of Jeffrey Epstein’s death, Lamine N’Diaye, was reassigned and eventually quietly retired amid ongoing scrutiny and federal investigations into the circumstances surrounding the high-profile inmate’s suicide. After Epstein was found dead in August 2019, Attorney General William Barr ordered the warden removed from MCC and reassigned to a Bureau of Prisons regional office while the Department of Justice and Inspector General probed the facility’s lapses. Although there were efforts within the Bureau of Prisons to move him to other posts — including as acting warden at another federal facility — those moves became entangled with the unresolved investigations, and N’Diaye ultimately stepped away from his role quietly as the inquiries continued, with little public explanation or high-profile disciplinary action.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72792692</guid><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 10:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72792692/megaepsteinstaymccwardenretires.mp3" length="43050705" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e8fb3730-1961-43e0-b74e-c7e1799746bc/e8fb3730-1961-43e0-b74e-c7e1799746bc.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e8fb3730-1961-43e0-b74e-c7e1799746bc/e8fb3730-1961-43e0-b74e-c7e1799746bc.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e8fb3730-1961-43e0-b74e-c7e1799746bc/e8fb3730-1961-43e0-b74e-c7e1799746bc.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jeffrey Epstein’s time at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in Manhattan was marked by extraordinary irregularities that immediately set his detention apart from that of ordinary federal inmates. After his July 2019 arrest on federal sex...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein’s time at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in Manhattan was marked by extraordinary irregularities that immediately set his detention apart from that of ordinary federal inmates. After his July 2019 arrest on federal sex trafficking charges, Epstein was placed in the Special Housing Unit, officially for his own protection, but the conditions of that confinement were riddled with contradictions. He was housed in a unit that was understaffed, plagued by malfunctioning cameras, and run by a Bureau of Prisons already under scrutiny for mismanagement. Despite being classified as a high-risk inmate due to the seriousness of the charges, his wealth, and the potential exposure of powerful associates, Epstein was repeatedly removed from standard suicide watch protocols. He was briefly placed on suicide watch after being found injured in his cell in late July, then taken off it under circumstances that were never convincingly explained, returning to a unit where basic safeguards were visibly failing.<br /><br />The failures at MCC culminated in Epstein’s death on August 10, 2019, when he was found unresponsive in his cell, officially ruled a suicide by hanging. On the night of his death, guards assigned to check on him allegedly fell asleep and failed to perform required welfare checks, while security cameras outside his cell were either broken or produced unusable footage. His cellmate had been transferred out shortly before his death, leaving Epstein alone despite prior concerns about self-harm. The combination of staffing shortages, ignored protocols, missing or nonfunctional surveillance, and a pattern of administrative negligence created a perfect storm that has fueled widespread skepticism about the official narrative. Epstein’s death at MCC did not close the case; instead, it intensified public distrust in the federal prison system and reinforced the perception that even in custody, Epstein remained surrounded by institutional failure and unanswered questions.<br /><br /><br />The warden in charge of the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) at the time of Jeffrey Epstein’s death, Lamine N’Diaye, was reassigned and eventually quietly retired amid ongoing scrutiny and federal investigations into the circumstances surrounding the high-profile inmate’s suicide. After Epstein was found dead in August 2019, Attorney General William Barr ordered the warden removed from MCC and reassigned to a Bureau of Prisons regional office while the Department of Justice and Inspector General probed the facility’s lapses. Although there were efforts within the Bureau of Prisons to move him to other posts — including as acting warden at another federal facility — those moves became entangled with the unresolved investigations, and N’Diaye ultimately stepped away from his role quietly as the inquiries continued, with little public explanation or high-profile disciplinary action.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2691</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   Stacey Plaskett And Her Motion To Dismiss The Epstein Survivor Lawsuit (Part 3-4)  (7/3/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-stacey-plaskett-and-her-motion-to-dismiss-the-epstein-survivor-lawsuit-part-3-4-7-3-26--72792456</link><description><![CDATA[<br /><br /><br /><br />Stacey Plaskett, Democrat and Delegate to Congress from the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI), has been actively seeking the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by survivors of Jeffrey Epstein. The lawsuit, which targets various officials from the USVI, accuses them of enabling Epstein's sex trafficking activities. Plaskett has described the suit as "legally and factually frivolous" and argues that the claims against her lack any substantial basis, suggesting that her inclusion is an attempt to unfairly malign her reputation due to her high profile​.<br /><br />Plaskett's legal team contends that the lawsuit does not meet the necessary pleading standards and that there is no evidence connecting her to Epstein's criminal activities. They argue that her interactions with Epstein, including accepting campaign donations from him, do not imply any knowledge or involvement in his illegal actions​. Plaskett asserts that the lawsuit is a scattershot attempt at monetary gain, aiming to exploit her public status to increase the case's visibility and pressure for a settlement​.<br /><br />What do the facts tell us?   <br /><br /><br />Let's dive in and find out.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.610915/gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.78.0.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Microsoft Word - 15154228_7.docx (courtlistener.com)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72792456</guid><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 08:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72792456/megaplaskettdismiss3n4.mp3" length="19893229" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/252a64c1-10ae-4e9e-b8d2-e9f3a1a674be/252a64c1-10ae-4e9e-b8d2-e9f3a1a674be.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/252a64c1-10ae-4e9e-b8d2-e9f3a1a674be/252a64c1-10ae-4e9e-b8d2-e9f3a1a674be.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/252a64c1-10ae-4e9e-b8d2-e9f3a1a674be/252a64c1-10ae-4e9e-b8d2-e9f3a1a674be.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Stacey Plaskett, Democrat and Delegate to Congress from the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI), has been actively seeking the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by survivors of Jeffrey Epstein. The lawsuit, which targets various officials from the USVI, accuses...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br /><br /><br /><br />Stacey Plaskett, Democrat and Delegate to Congress from the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI), has been actively seeking the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by survivors of Jeffrey Epstein. The lawsuit, which targets various officials from the USVI, accuses them of enabling Epstein's sex trafficking activities. Plaskett has described the suit as "legally and factually frivolous" and argues that the claims against her lack any substantial basis, suggesting that her inclusion is an attempt to unfairly malign her reputation due to her high profile​.<br /><br />Plaskett's legal team contends that the lawsuit does not meet the necessary pleading standards and that there is no evidence connecting her to Epstein's criminal activities. They argue that her interactions with Epstein, including accepting campaign donations from him, do not imply any knowledge or involvement in his illegal actions​. Plaskett asserts that the lawsuit is a scattershot attempt at monetary gain, aiming to exploit her public status to increase the case's visibility and pressure for a settlement​.<br /><br />What do the facts tell us?   <br /><br /><br />Let's dive in and find out.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.610915/gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.78.0.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Microsoft Word - 15154228_7.docx (courtlistener.com)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1244</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   Stacey Plaskett And Her Motion To Dismiss The Epstein Survivor Lawsuit (Part 1-2)  (7/2/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-stacey-plaskett-and-her-motion-to-dismiss-the-epstein-survivor-lawsuit-part-1-2-7-2-26--72792455</link><description><![CDATA[<br /><br /><br /><br />Stacey Plaskett, Democrat and Delegate to Congress from the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI), has been actively seeking the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by survivors of Jeffrey Epstein. The lawsuit, which targets various officials from the USVI, accuses them of enabling Epstein's sex trafficking activities. Plaskett has described the suit as "legally and factually frivolous" and argues that the claims against her lack any substantial basis, suggesting that her inclusion is an attempt to unfairly malign her reputation due to her high profile​.<br /><br />Plaskett's legal team contends that the lawsuit does not meet the necessary pleading standards and that there is no evidence connecting her to Epstein's criminal activities. They argue that her interactions with Epstein, including accepting campaign donations from him, do not imply any knowledge or involvement in his illegal actions​. Plaskett asserts that the lawsuit is a scattershot attempt at monetary gain, aiming to exploit her public status to increase the case's visibility and pressure for a settlement​.<br /><br />What do the facts tell us?   <br /><br /><br />Let's dive in and find out.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.610915/gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.78.0.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Microsoft Word - 15154228_7.docx (courtlistener.com)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72792455</guid><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 06:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72792455/megaplaskettdismiss1n2.mp3" length="23930297" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1040a684-b3b9-4611-a5cd-7b035b2c7ef6/1040a684-b3b9-4611-a5cd-7b035b2c7ef6.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1040a684-b3b9-4611-a5cd-7b035b2c7ef6/1040a684-b3b9-4611-a5cd-7b035b2c7ef6.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1040a684-b3b9-4611-a5cd-7b035b2c7ef6/1040a684-b3b9-4611-a5cd-7b035b2c7ef6.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Stacey Plaskett, Democrat and Delegate to Congress from the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI), has been actively seeking the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by survivors of Jeffrey Epstein. The lawsuit, which targets various officials from the USVI, accuses...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br /><br /><br /><br />Stacey Plaskett, Democrat and Delegate to Congress from the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI), has been actively seeking the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by survivors of Jeffrey Epstein. The lawsuit, which targets various officials from the USVI, accuses them of enabling Epstein's sex trafficking activities. Plaskett has described the suit as "legally and factually frivolous" and argues that the claims against her lack any substantial basis, suggesting that her inclusion is an attempt to unfairly malign her reputation due to her high profile​.<br /><br />Plaskett's legal team contends that the lawsuit does not meet the necessary pleading standards and that there is no evidence connecting her to Epstein's criminal activities. They argue that her interactions with Epstein, including accepting campaign donations from him, do not imply any knowledge or involvement in his illegal actions​. Plaskett asserts that the lawsuit is a scattershot attempt at monetary gain, aiming to exploit her public status to increase the case's visibility and pressure for a settlement​.<br /><br />What do the facts tell us?   <br /><br /><br />Let's dive in and find out.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.610915/gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.78.0.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Microsoft Word - 15154228_7.docx (courtlistener.com)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1496</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Inside The OIG Interview:  The Testimony Of An Unnamed MCC Lieutenant (Part 11)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/inside-the-oig-interview-the-testimony-of-an-unnamed-mcc-lieutenant-part-11--72764206</link><description><![CDATA[The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command responsibilities, and awareness of Epstein’s status—the lieutenant repeatedly falls back on vague answers, limited recollection, or an inability to provide specifics. This pattern isn’t occasional—it’s consistent, especially on the exact points where clarity matters most. Rather than offering firm timelines or accountability, the testimony often drifts into generalities, creating the impression that either key information was not retained or not being fully disclosed.<br /><br />That evasiveness becomes even more glaring when discussing the hours leading up to and immediately following Epstein’s death. Questions about whether protocols were followed, who was responsible for monitoring, and how breakdowns occurred are met with uncertainty or deflection, leaving major gaps in the narrative. Instead of clarifying what went wrong, the testimony reinforces the sense of confusion and lack of oversight already seen in other MCC accounts. The result is a record that feels less like a clear explanation and more like a fragmented, incomplete account—one that raises as many questions about credibility and accountability as it answers about the failures inside the facility.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00062649.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00062649.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72764206</guid><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 04:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72764206/mccoiglieutenant11.mp3" length="13825297" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/18a5fa4d-2e9d-4cc8-8b3e-fa3458e4fa15/18a5fa4d-2e9d-4cc8-8b3e-fa3458e4fa15.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/18a5fa4d-2e9d-4cc8-8b3e-fa3458e4fa15/18a5fa4d-2e9d-4cc8-8b3e-fa3458e4fa15.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/18a5fa4d-2e9d-4cc8-8b3e-fa3458e4fa15/18a5fa4d-2e9d-4cc8-8b3e-fa3458e4fa15.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command responsibilities, and awareness of Epstein’s status—the lieutenant repeatedly falls back on vague answers, limited recollection, or an inability to provide specifics. This pattern isn’t occasional—it’s consistent, especially on the exact points where clarity matters most. Rather than offering firm timelines or accountability, the testimony often drifts into generalities, creating the impression that either key information was not retained or not being fully disclosed.<br /><br />That evasiveness becomes even more glaring when discussing the hours leading up to and immediately following Epstein’s death. Questions about whether protocols were followed, who was responsible for monitoring, and how breakdowns occurred are met with uncertainty or deflection, leaving major gaps in the narrative. Instead of clarifying what went wrong, the testimony reinforces the sense of confusion and lack of oversight already seen in other MCC accounts. The result is a record that feels less like a clear explanation and more like a fragmented, incomplete account—one that raises as many questions about credibility and accountability as it answers about the failures inside the facility.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00062649.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00062649.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>865</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Inside The OIG Interview:  The Testimony Of An Unnamed MCC Lieutenant (Part 10)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/inside-the-oig-interview-the-testimony-of-an-unnamed-mcc-lieutenant-part-10--72764207</link><description><![CDATA[The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command responsibilities, and awareness of Epstein’s status—the lieutenant repeatedly falls back on vague answers, limited recollection, or an inability to provide specifics. This pattern isn’t occasional—it’s consistent, especially on the exact points where clarity matters most. Rather than offering firm timelines or accountability, the testimony often drifts into generalities, creating the impression that either key information was not retained or not being fully disclosed.<br /><br />That evasiveness becomes even more glaring when discussing the hours leading up to and immediately following Epstein’s death. Questions about whether protocols were followed, who was responsible for monitoring, and how breakdowns occurred are met with uncertainty or deflection, leaving major gaps in the narrative. Instead of clarifying what went wrong, the testimony reinforces the sense of confusion and lack of oversight already seen in other MCC accounts. The result is a record that feels less like a clear explanation and more like a fragmented, incomplete account—one that raises as many questions about credibility and accountability as it answers about the failures inside the facility.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00062649.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00062649.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72764207</guid><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 02:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72764207/mccoiglieutenant10.mp3" length="19586029" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4f48c3b9-86ce-444d-bd94-e210ede65508/4f48c3b9-86ce-444d-bd94-e210ede65508.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4f48c3b9-86ce-444d-bd94-e210ede65508/4f48c3b9-86ce-444d-bd94-e210ede65508.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4f48c3b9-86ce-444d-bd94-e210ede65508/4f48c3b9-86ce-444d-bd94-e210ede65508.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command responsibilities, and awareness of Epstein’s status—the lieutenant repeatedly falls back on vague answers, limited recollection, or an inability to provide specifics. This pattern isn’t occasional—it’s consistent, especially on the exact points where clarity matters most. Rather than offering firm timelines or accountability, the testimony often drifts into generalities, creating the impression that either key information was not retained or not being fully disclosed.<br /><br />That evasiveness becomes even more glaring when discussing the hours leading up to and immediately following Epstein’s death. Questions about whether protocols were followed, who was responsible for monitoring, and how breakdowns occurred are met with uncertainty or deflection, leaving major gaps in the narrative. Instead of clarifying what went wrong, the testimony reinforces the sense of confusion and lack of oversight already seen in other MCC accounts. The result is a record that feels less like a clear explanation and more like a fragmented, incomplete account—one that raises as many questions about credibility and accountability as it answers about the failures inside the facility.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00062649.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00062649.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1225</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Inside The OIG Interview:  The Testimony Of An Unnamed MCC Lieutenant (Part 9)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/inside-the-oig-interview-the-testimony-of-an-unnamed-mcc-lieutenant-part-9--72764209</link><description><![CDATA[The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command responsibilities, and awareness of Epstein’s status—the lieutenant repeatedly falls back on vague answers, limited recollection, or an inability to provide specifics. This pattern isn’t occasional—it’s consistent, especially on the exact points where clarity matters most. Rather than offering firm timelines or accountability, the testimony often drifts into generalities, creating the impression that either key information was not retained or not being fully disclosed.<br /><br />That evasiveness becomes even more glaring when discussing the hours leading up to and immediately following Epstein’s death. Questions about whether protocols were followed, who was responsible for monitoring, and how breakdowns occurred are met with uncertainty or deflection, leaving major gaps in the narrative. Instead of clarifying what went wrong, the testimony reinforces the sense of confusion and lack of oversight already seen in other MCC accounts. The result is a record that feels less like a clear explanation and more like a fragmented, incomplete account—one that raises as many questions about credibility and accountability as it answers about the failures inside the facility.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00062649.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00062649.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72764209</guid><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 00:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72764209/mccoiglieutenant9.mp3" length="18454613" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3de7ffc9-aaf7-4e8c-acb8-040010816745/3de7ffc9-aaf7-4e8c-acb8-040010816745.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3de7ffc9-aaf7-4e8c-acb8-040010816745/3de7ffc9-aaf7-4e8c-acb8-040010816745.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3de7ffc9-aaf7-4e8c-acb8-040010816745/3de7ffc9-aaf7-4e8c-acb8-040010816745.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command responsibilities, and awareness of Epstein’s status—the lieutenant repeatedly falls back on vague answers, limited recollection, or an inability to provide specifics. This pattern isn’t occasional—it’s consistent, especially on the exact points where clarity matters most. Rather than offering firm timelines or accountability, the testimony often drifts into generalities, creating the impression that either key information was not retained or not being fully disclosed.<br /><br />That evasiveness becomes even more glaring when discussing the hours leading up to and immediately following Epstein’s death. Questions about whether protocols were followed, who was responsible for monitoring, and how breakdowns occurred are met with uncertainty or deflection, leaving major gaps in the narrative. Instead of clarifying what went wrong, the testimony reinforces the sense of confusion and lack of oversight already seen in other MCC accounts. The result is a record that feels less like a clear explanation and more like a fragmented, incomplete account—one that raises as many questions about credibility and accountability as it answers about the failures inside the facility.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00062649.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00062649.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1154</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Inside The OIG Interview:  The Testimony Of An Unnamed MCC Lieutenant (Part 8)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/inside-the-oig-interview-the-testimony-of-an-unnamed-mcc-lieutenant-part-8--72764210</link><description><![CDATA[The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command responsibilities, and awareness of Epstein’s status—the lieutenant repeatedly falls back on vague answers, limited recollection, or an inability to provide specifics. This pattern isn’t occasional—it’s consistent, especially on the exact points where clarity matters most. Rather than offering firm timelines or accountability, the testimony often drifts into generalities, creating the impression that either key information was not retained or not being fully disclosed.<br /><br />That evasiveness becomes even more glaring when discussing the hours leading up to and immediately following Epstein’s death. Questions about whether protocols were followed, who was responsible for monitoring, and how breakdowns occurred are met with uncertainty or deflection, leaving major gaps in the narrative. Instead of clarifying what went wrong, the testimony reinforces the sense of confusion and lack of oversight already seen in other MCC accounts. The result is a record that feels less like a clear explanation and more like a fragmented, incomplete account—one that raises as many questions about credibility and accountability as it answers about the failures inside the facility.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00062649.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00062649.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72764210</guid><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 22:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72764210/mccoiglieutenant8.mp3" length="15974444" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e2af5ce9-aa77-4f78-af03-af9dbe7cbe4a/e2af5ce9-aa77-4f78-af03-af9dbe7cbe4a.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e2af5ce9-aa77-4f78-af03-af9dbe7cbe4a/e2af5ce9-aa77-4f78-af03-af9dbe7cbe4a.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e2af5ce9-aa77-4f78-af03-af9dbe7cbe4a/e2af5ce9-aa77-4f78-af03-af9dbe7cbe4a.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command responsibilities, and awareness of Epstein’s status—the lieutenant repeatedly falls back on vague answers, limited recollection, or an inability to provide specifics. This pattern isn’t occasional—it’s consistent, especially on the exact points where clarity matters most. Rather than offering firm timelines or accountability, the testimony often drifts into generalities, creating the impression that either key information was not retained or not being fully disclosed.<br /><br />That evasiveness becomes even more glaring when discussing the hours leading up to and immediately following Epstein’s death. Questions about whether protocols were followed, who was responsible for monitoring, and how breakdowns occurred are met with uncertainty or deflection, leaving major gaps in the narrative. Instead of clarifying what went wrong, the testimony reinforces the sense of confusion and lack of oversight already seen in other MCC accounts. The result is a record that feels less like a clear explanation and more like a fragmented, incomplete account—one that raises as many questions about credibility and accountability as it answers about the failures inside the facility.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00062649.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00062649.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>999</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Bill Gates Epstein Related Congressional Transcripts (Part 10) (7/2/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-bill-gates-epstein-related-congressional-transcripts-part-10-7-2-26--72779057</link><description><![CDATA[<br />The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates testified that he met Epstein roughly 12 to 14 times between 2011 and 2014, saying he believed Epstein could help attract major philanthropic donations to global health initiatives through the Gates Foundation. He repeatedly described those meetings as "a mistake," insisted he never visited Epstein's private island, New Mexico ranch, or Florida residence, and said he never witnessed criminal conduct or participated in any of Epstein's illegal activities. Gates told lawmakers he ultimately concluded that Epstein had exaggerated both his financial connections and his ability to raise money for philanthropy.<br /><br /><br />One of the most closely watched portions of the transcript concerned allegations that Epstein sought to pressure Gates using knowledge of Gates' personal life. Gates acknowledged several extramarital affairs and testified that Epstein appeared to have learned about them, later making what Gates described as "veiled" attempts at blackmail by referencing those relationships and seeking money connected to one of the women. Gates said he believed Epstein "contemplated" blackmail but maintained he was never actually blackmailed, never paid Epstein to keep information secret, and never committed crimes with him. Throughout the interview, Gates emphasized that his association with Epstein damaged his judgment and reputation, expressed support for releasing the Epstein files and for continued investigations, and said survivors deserve justice while denying any involvement in Epstein's trafficking operation or abuse of minors.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72779057</guid><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 20:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72779057/gatestranscript10.mp3" length="12026819" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/195b0c5f-d6af-4500-929c-238d6d7f18e7/195b0c5f-d6af-4500-929c-238d6d7f18e7.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/195b0c5f-d6af-4500-929c-238d6d7f18e7/195b0c5f-d6af-4500-929c-238d6d7f18e7.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/195b0c5f-d6af-4500-929c-238d6d7f18e7/195b0c5f-d6af-4500-929c-238d6d7f18e7.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br />The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates testified that he met Epstein roughly 12 to 14 times between 2011 and 2014, saying he believed Epstein could help attract major philanthropic donations to global health initiatives through the Gates Foundation. He repeatedly described those meetings as "a mistake," insisted he never visited Epstein's private island, New Mexico ranch, or Florida residence, and said he never witnessed criminal conduct or participated in any of Epstein's illegal activities. Gates told lawmakers he ultimately concluded that Epstein had exaggerated both his financial connections and his ability to raise money for philanthropy.<br /><br /><br />One of the most closely watched portions of the transcript concerned allegations that Epstein sought to pressure Gates using knowledge of Gates' personal life. Gates acknowledged several extramarital affairs and testified that Epstein appeared to have learned about them, later making what Gates described as "veiled" attempts at blackmail by referencing those relationships and seeking money connected to one of the women. Gates said he believed Epstein "contemplated" blackmail but maintained he was never actually blackmailed, never paid Epstein to keep information secret, and never committed crimes with him. Throughout the interview, Gates emphasized that his association with Epstein damaged his judgment and reputation, expressed support for releasing the Epstein files and for continued investigations, and said survivors deserve justice while denying any involvement in Epstein's trafficking operation or abuse of minors.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>752</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Jane Doe 4’s Family Says She Fears the Trump Administration (7/2/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/jane-doe-4-s-family-says-she-fears-the-trump-administration-7-2-26--72779050</link><description><![CDATA[A woman identified in the Epstein files as Jane Doe 4 is reportedly “staying off the grid” and living in fear of retaliation from the Trump administration, according to a relative who spoke to The Guardian. Jane Doe 4 gave four FBI interviews in 2019 after Epstein’s arrest, alleging that Epstein abused her in the 1980s and that Donald Trump sexually assaulted her when she was between 13 and 15 years old. Trump and the White House have denied the allegations, calling them “completely baseless” and unsupported by credible evidence. The FBI did not bring charges tied to Jane Doe 4’s claims, and there is no indication the bureau continued investigating after her 2019 interviews, which ended after she told agents she believed she was being followed.<br /><br />The handling of Jane Doe 4’s files has become a flashpoint in the fight over the Epstein records because the Justice Department released some records but still has not produced handwritten FBI interview notes from her sessions. A federal judge ordered acting Attorney General Todd Blanche to produce unredacted versions of already released Epstein files by July 2 or explain why they cannot be released, and also ordered the DOJ to turn over interview notes related to Jane Doe 4’s allegations. The controversy has intensified because Blanche, Trump’s former personal attorney and nominee for permanent attorney general, oversaw the DOJ’s Epstein files release, which critics say exposed victim information, withheld millions of documents, and mishandled politically sensitive material. Victims’ advocates argue Jane Doe 4 should not have to keep coming forward and that the DOJ should be responsible for taking her FBI testimony seriously and releasing the records required under the Epstein transparency law.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/30/alleged-epstein-victim-trump-accuser" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Alleged Epstein victim and Trump accuser living in fear of retaliation, relative says | Jeffrey Epstein | The Guardian</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72779050</guid><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 18:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72779050/trumpaccuserinhiding.mp3" length="16488951" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/59e92539-7fa1-43b3-94c6-167e045ee056/59e92539-7fa1-43b3-94c6-167e045ee056.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/59e92539-7fa1-43b3-94c6-167e045ee056/59e92539-7fa1-43b3-94c6-167e045ee056.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/59e92539-7fa1-43b3-94c6-167e045ee056/59e92539-7fa1-43b3-94c6-167e045ee056.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A woman identified in the Epstein files as Jane Doe 4 is reportedly “staying off the grid” and living in fear of retaliation from the Trump administration, according to a relative who spoke to The Guardian. Jane Doe 4 gave four FBI interviews in 2019...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A woman identified in the Epstein files as Jane Doe 4 is reportedly “staying off the grid” and living in fear of retaliation from the Trump administration, according to a relative who spoke to The Guardian. Jane Doe 4 gave four FBI interviews in 2019 after Epstein’s arrest, alleging that Epstein abused her in the 1980s and that Donald Trump sexually assaulted her when she was between 13 and 15 years old. Trump and the White House have denied the allegations, calling them “completely baseless” and unsupported by credible evidence. The FBI did not bring charges tied to Jane Doe 4’s claims, and there is no indication the bureau continued investigating after her 2019 interviews, which ended after she told agents she believed she was being followed.<br /><br />The handling of Jane Doe 4’s files has become a flashpoint in the fight over the Epstein records because the Justice Department released some records but still has not produced handwritten FBI interview notes from her sessions. A federal judge ordered acting Attorney General Todd Blanche to produce unredacted versions of already released Epstein files by July 2 or explain why they cannot be released, and also ordered the DOJ to turn over interview notes related to Jane Doe 4’s allegations. The controversy has intensified because Blanche, Trump’s former personal attorney and nominee for permanent attorney general, oversaw the DOJ’s Epstein files release, which critics say exposed victim information, withheld millions of documents, and mishandled politically sensitive material. Victims’ advocates argue Jane Doe 4 should not have to keep coming forward and that the DOJ should be responsible for taking her FBI testimony seriously and releasing the records required under the Epstein transparency law.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/30/alleged-epstein-victim-trump-accuser" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Alleged Epstein victim and Trump accuser living in fear of retaliation, relative says | Jeffrey Epstein | The Guardian</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1031</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Congress Subpoenas Leon Black After Epstein Testimony Standoff (7/2/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/congress-subpoenas-leon-black-after-epstein-testimony-standoff-7-2-26--72779049</link><description><![CDATA[Leon Black appeared before the House Oversight Committee for a closed-door interview about his decades-long relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, but the session escalated when Black refused to answer questions about nondisclosure agreements involving women. Chairman James Comer issued two subpoenas: one compelling Black to return for a deposition on July 16, and another demanding records related to those NDAs. Comer said lawmakers want to know whether Epstein was involved in drafting, funding, arranging, or otherwise using the agreements to silence women. Black’s attorney Susan Estrich called the subpoenas a “planned political stunt” and said Epstein had no involvement with any NDAs, whether they exist or not.<br /><br />Black denied abusing women, denied trafficking, denied being blackmailed, and denied paying Epstein for access to women, saying the more than $170 million he paid Epstein was for tax and estate-planning advice. He described Epstein as living a “Jekyll and Hyde” existence, saying he knew Epstein’s connected, useful side but not his criminal side, and claimed Epstein lied to him about the nature of his 2008 conviction. Lawmakers were openly skeptical, especially because Black’s payments gave Epstein a massive post-conviction financial lifeline, and because newly released Epstein files reportedly mention Black thousands of times. The appearance left Black still insisting he was deceived, while Congress signaled that his Epstein relationship, private settlements, and financial dealings are far from finished business.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protnmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://abcnews.com/US/billionaire-leon-black-face-questions-decades-long-relationship/story?id=134222299" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Comer subpoenas Leon Black after his refusal to answer some Epstein questions from panel - ABC News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72779049</guid><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 16:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72779049/moreonblackscongressionalwalkout.mp3" length="23775234" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/64752bbf-db47-43dd-806d-255d50db70eb/64752bbf-db47-43dd-806d-255d50db70eb.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/64752bbf-db47-43dd-806d-255d50db70eb/64752bbf-db47-43dd-806d-255d50db70eb.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/64752bbf-db47-43dd-806d-255d50db70eb/64752bbf-db47-43dd-806d-255d50db70eb.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Leon Black appeared before the House Oversight Committee for a closed-door interview about his decades-long relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, but the session escalated when Black refused to answer questions about nondisclosure agreements involving...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Leon Black appeared before the House Oversight Committee for a closed-door interview about his decades-long relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, but the session escalated when Black refused to answer questions about nondisclosure agreements involving women. Chairman James Comer issued two subpoenas: one compelling Black to return for a deposition on July 16, and another demanding records related to those NDAs. Comer said lawmakers want to know whether Epstein was involved in drafting, funding, arranging, or otherwise using the agreements to silence women. Black’s attorney Susan Estrich called the subpoenas a “planned political stunt” and said Epstein had no involvement with any NDAs, whether they exist or not.<br /><br />Black denied abusing women, denied trafficking, denied being blackmailed, and denied paying Epstein for access to women, saying the more than $170 million he paid Epstein was for tax and estate-planning advice. He described Epstein as living a “Jekyll and Hyde” existence, saying he knew Epstein’s connected, useful side but not his criminal side, and claimed Epstein lied to him about the nature of his 2008 conviction. Lawmakers were openly skeptical, especially because Black’s payments gave Epstein a massive post-conviction financial lifeline, and because newly released Epstein files reportedly mention Black thousands of times. The appearance left Black still insisting he was deceived, while Congress signaled that his Epstein relationship, private settlements, and financial dealings are far from finished business.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protnmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://abcnews.com/US/billionaire-leon-black-face-questions-decades-long-relationship/story?id=134222299" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Comer subpoenas Leon Black after his refusal to answer some Epstein questions from panel - ABC News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1486</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Doug Band Gives His Epstein Related Testimony To Congress (7/2/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/doug-band-gives-his-epstein-related-testimony-to-congress-7-2-26--72779026</link><description><![CDATA[Doug Band, once one of Bill Clinton’s closest aides and a key figure in Clinton’s post-presidential world, sat for a closed-door interview with the House Oversight Committee as part of its investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. According to sources familiar with the interview, Band repeatedly said he could not recall details about his interactions with Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and related communications. Lawmakers pressed him on his past ties to both Epstein and Maxwell, including emails between Band and Maxwell from 2001 to 2004 that included personal nicknames, innuendo, and discussions of meetings. Band reportedly confirmed that an email address connected to Clinton in the Epstein files was his and that no one else had access to it, but said he did not remember sending specific emails to Maxwell. He also said he had no evidence or information that Clinton ever went to Epstein’s island, despite having told Vanity Fair in 2020 that Clinton had visited Little St. James.<br /><br />Band also reportedly told the committee that he took steps to shield Clinton from Maxwell once he became aware of allegations, denied any sexual contact with Maxwell, and said he did not remember being introduced to any woman or girl connected to her. He also said he did not recall conversations with Epstein during the flights he took with Clinton on Epstein’s private plane. Flight records made public in civil litigation show Clinton, often with Band and others, flew on Epstein’s plane more than two dozen times in 2002 and 2003, though ABC reports those logs do not show trips to Little St. James. Clinton, Maxwell, and Epstein have all denied that Clinton visited the island, and Clinton has denied knowledge of Epstein’s crimes. Band has not been accused of wrongdoing, and his voluntary interview was not recorded; the committee is expected to release transcripts after review and redaction.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://abcnews.com/US/doug-band-former-aide-bill-clinton-questioned-clintons/story?id=134313410" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Doug Band, former aide to Bill Clinton, repeatedly tells panel he cannot recall interactions with Epstein: Sources - ABC News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72779026</guid><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 14:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72779026/dougbandgivestestimony.mp3" length="13445373" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/01d76aee-a329-48e8-9ae4-ff5fb2f6ff0e/01d76aee-a329-48e8-9ae4-ff5fb2f6ff0e.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/01d76aee-a329-48e8-9ae4-ff5fb2f6ff0e/01d76aee-a329-48e8-9ae4-ff5fb2f6ff0e.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/01d76aee-a329-48e8-9ae4-ff5fb2f6ff0e/01d76aee-a329-48e8-9ae4-ff5fb2f6ff0e.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Doug Band, once one of Bill Clinton’s closest aides and a key figure in Clinton’s post-presidential world, sat for a closed-door interview with the House Oversight Committee as part of its investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. According to sources...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Doug Band, once one of Bill Clinton’s closest aides and a key figure in Clinton’s post-presidential world, sat for a closed-door interview with the House Oversight Committee as part of its investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. According to sources familiar with the interview, Band repeatedly said he could not recall details about his interactions with Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and related communications. Lawmakers pressed him on his past ties to both Epstein and Maxwell, including emails between Band and Maxwell from 2001 to 2004 that included personal nicknames, innuendo, and discussions of meetings. Band reportedly confirmed that an email address connected to Clinton in the Epstein files was his and that no one else had access to it, but said he did not remember sending specific emails to Maxwell. He also said he had no evidence or information that Clinton ever went to Epstein’s island, despite having told Vanity Fair in 2020 that Clinton had visited Little St. James.<br /><br />Band also reportedly told the committee that he took steps to shield Clinton from Maxwell once he became aware of allegations, denied any sexual contact with Maxwell, and said he did not remember being introduced to any woman or girl connected to her. He also said he did not recall conversations with Epstein during the flights he took with Clinton on Epstein’s private plane. Flight records made public in civil litigation show Clinton, often with Band and others, flew on Epstein’s plane more than two dozen times in 2002 and 2003, though ABC reports those logs do not show trips to Little St. James. Clinton, Maxwell, and Epstein have all denied that Clinton visited the island, and Clinton has denied knowledge of Epstein’s crimes. Band has not been accused of wrongdoing, and his voluntary interview was not recorded; the committee is expected to release transcripts after review and redaction.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://abcnews.com/US/doug-band-former-aide-bill-clinton-questioned-clintons/story?id=134313410" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Doug Band, former aide to Bill Clinton, repeatedly tells panel he cannot recall interactions with Epstein: Sources - ABC News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>841</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Murder In Moselle: Othram, Genetic Genealogy, and the Defense’s New Murdaugh Strategy (7/2/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moselle-othram-genetic-genealogy-and-the-defense-s-new-murdaugh-strategy-7-2-26--72779051</link><description><![CDATA[South Carolina prosecutors are pushing back against Alex Murdaugh’s defense team as he prepares for a retrial in the murders of his wife, Maggie, and son, Paul. The fight centers on a defense request for independent testing of DNA found under Maggie Murdaugh’s fingernails, specifically her left fingernail clippings. Murdaugh’s lawyers argue the sample included DNA from an unknown unrelated male and want it sent to Othram, a forensic genetic genealogy lab, at Murdaugh’s expense. Prosecutors counter that SLED already tested the evidence and found only Maggie’s DNA mixed with what they described as a “very partial and incomplete” profile from another contributor, not enough to upload to CODIS. They also argue that trace or touch DNA under fingernails does not automatically mean a struggle took place, because it can be transferred through ordinary contact, objects, or the environment, and they noted Maggie had her nails done the day she was killed.<br /><br />The state also opposed Murdaugh’s request to use a secure prison laptop to review case materials, arguing he should not be trusted with unsupervised electronic access behind bars. Prosecutors pointed to prior disciplinary issues involving alleged misuse of a prison tablet, unauthorized use of another inmate’s PIN, and a previous contraband issue involving a book allegedly passed to him through defense staff. Judge Debra McCaslin did not immediately rule on the DNA issue and told the defense to clarify whether the remaining sample is viable for further testing. On the laptop issue, she indicated the prison warden would not allow Murdaugh to keep one in his cell because of safety concerns, but suggested his attorneys could bring a laptop to a conference room and review materials with him under supervision. The larger backdrop is that Murdaugh is headed for a retrial after the South Carolina Supreme Court overturned his murder convictions in May, finding that former clerk of court Becky Hill’s conduct had tainted the jury.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.foxnews.com/true-crime/alex-murdaugh-faces-state-pushback-maggie-dna-testing-prison-laptop-request" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Alex Murdaugh DNA testing opposed by prosecutors ahead of retrial | Fox News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72779051</guid><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 12:15:01 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72779051/murdaughdnabattle.mp3" length="10071606" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/03216587-63d4-4c14-994b-2d47080b3e40/03216587-63d4-4c14-994b-2d47080b3e40.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/03216587-63d4-4c14-994b-2d47080b3e40/03216587-63d4-4c14-994b-2d47080b3e40.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/03216587-63d4-4c14-994b-2d47080b3e40/03216587-63d4-4c14-994b-2d47080b3e40.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>South Carolina prosecutors are pushing back against Alex Murdaugh’s defense team as he prepares for a retrial in the murders of his wife, Maggie, and son, Paul. The fight centers on a defense request for independent testing of DNA found under Maggie...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[South Carolina prosecutors are pushing back against Alex Murdaugh’s defense team as he prepares for a retrial in the murders of his wife, Maggie, and son, Paul. The fight centers on a defense request for independent testing of DNA found under Maggie Murdaugh’s fingernails, specifically her left fingernail clippings. Murdaugh’s lawyers argue the sample included DNA from an unknown unrelated male and want it sent to Othram, a forensic genetic genealogy lab, at Murdaugh’s expense. Prosecutors counter that SLED already tested the evidence and found only Maggie’s DNA mixed with what they described as a “very partial and incomplete” profile from another contributor, not enough to upload to CODIS. They also argue that trace or touch DNA under fingernails does not automatically mean a struggle took place, because it can be transferred through ordinary contact, objects, or the environment, and they noted Maggie had her nails done the day she was killed.<br /><br />The state also opposed Murdaugh’s request to use a secure prison laptop to review case materials, arguing he should not be trusted with unsupervised electronic access behind bars. Prosecutors pointed to prior disciplinary issues involving alleged misuse of a prison tablet, unauthorized use of another inmate’s PIN, and a previous contraband issue involving a book allegedly passed to him through defense staff. Judge Debra McCaslin did not immediately rule on the DNA issue and told the defense to clarify whether the remaining sample is viable for further testing. On the laptop issue, she indicated the prison warden would not allow Murdaugh to keep one in his cell because of safety concerns, but suggested his attorneys could bring a laptop to a conference room and review materials with him under supervision. The larger backdrop is that Murdaugh is headed for a retrial after the South Carolina Supreme Court overturned his murder convictions in May, finding that former clerk of court Becky Hill’s conduct had tainted the jury.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.foxnews.com/true-crime/alex-murdaugh-faces-state-pushback-maggie-dna-testing-prison-laptop-request" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Alex Murdaugh DNA testing opposed by prosecutors ahead of retrial | Fox News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>630</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Marc Rowan And Leon Black Outmaneuver Josh Harris To Keep Control At Apollo (7/2/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-marc-rowan-and-leon-black-outmaneuver-josh-harris-to-keep-control-at-apollo-7-2-26--72773691</link><description><![CDATA[Josh Harris saw the Epstein revelations around Leon Black as an opening to reshape Apollo’s leadership and, according to reporting and later court allegations, pushed to position himself as the natural successor or power center inside the firm. Black’s Epstein relationship had thrown Apollo into crisis, investors were demanding answers, and the firm needed a clean leadership story. Harris had long been one of Apollo’s three founding figures, but his relationship with Black had deteriorated, and Black later accused him of organizing a behind-the-scenes campaign — even a so-called “war council” of advisers, lawyers, publicists, and allies — to weaken Black and seize control as Epstein scrutiny consumed him. Harris denied those accusations, calling them false, and courts later dismissed Black’s RICO claims against him.<br /><br />Harris did not get the prize. Instead, Marc Rowan emerged as the compromise successor and ultimately took over as Apollo’s CEO, while Black’s influence and board support helped block Harris from becoming the dominant figure. The result was a bitter private-equity civil war: Black was forced out by the Epstein fallout, Harris failed to convert the moment into control of Apollo, and Rowan became the beneficiary of the chaos. Harris later stepped away from day-to-day Apollo leadership and eventually focused more on his outside business and sports ownership interests, while Apollo tried to sell Rowan’s rise as a clean reset after the Epstein damage. The irony is brutal: Epstein’s relationship with Black created the opening Harris wanted, but the internal power structure Harris helped build at Apollo ultimately closed around Rowan instead.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72773691</guid><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 10:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72773691/megamorebattleforcontrolapollo.mp3" length="40372811" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2fd0f8c3-de7f-4805-a62f-af0adedef0f5/2fd0f8c3-de7f-4805-a62f-af0adedef0f5.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2fd0f8c3-de7f-4805-a62f-af0adedef0f5/2fd0f8c3-de7f-4805-a62f-af0adedef0f5.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2fd0f8c3-de7f-4805-a62f-af0adedef0f5/2fd0f8c3-de7f-4805-a62f-af0adedef0f5.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Josh Harris saw the Epstein revelations around Leon Black as an opening to reshape Apollo’s leadership and, according to reporting and later court allegations, pushed to position himself as the natural successor or power center inside the firm....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Josh Harris saw the Epstein revelations around Leon Black as an opening to reshape Apollo’s leadership and, according to reporting and later court allegations, pushed to position himself as the natural successor or power center inside the firm. Black’s Epstein relationship had thrown Apollo into crisis, investors were demanding answers, and the firm needed a clean leadership story. Harris had long been one of Apollo’s three founding figures, but his relationship with Black had deteriorated, and Black later accused him of organizing a behind-the-scenes campaign — even a so-called “war council” of advisers, lawyers, publicists, and allies — to weaken Black and seize control as Epstein scrutiny consumed him. Harris denied those accusations, calling them false, and courts later dismissed Black’s RICO claims against him.<br /><br />Harris did not get the prize. Instead, Marc Rowan emerged as the compromise successor and ultimately took over as Apollo’s CEO, while Black’s influence and board support helped block Harris from becoming the dominant figure. The result was a bitter private-equity civil war: Black was forced out by the Epstein fallout, Harris failed to convert the moment into control of Apollo, and Rowan became the beneficiary of the chaos. Harris later stepped away from day-to-day Apollo leadership and eventually focused more on his outside business and sports ownership interests, while Apollo tried to sell Rowan’s rise as a clean reset after the Epstein damage. The irony is brutal: Epstein’s relationship with Black created the opening Harris wanted, but the internal power structure Harris helped build at Apollo ultimately closed around Rowan instead.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2524</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Jeffrey Epstein, Leon Black And The Shockwave Felt At Apollo Global (7/1/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-leon-black-and-the-shockwave-felt-at-apollo-global-7-1-26--72773690</link><description><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein’s relationship with Leon Black detonated inside Apollo Global Management because Black was not just any executive — he was Apollo’s co-founder, chairman, and public face. Once it became clear that Black had paid Epstein enormous sums after Epstein’s 2008 conviction, Apollo had a reputational crisis on its hands. The firm launched an independent review through its board’s conflicts committee, which examined Black’s relationship with Epstein and whether Apollo itself had business ties to Epstein. The review said it found no evidence that Black was involved in Epstein’s criminal conduct and said Apollo had not retained Epstein, but it also confirmed that Black paid Epstein huge fees for personal tax and estate-planning advice. That confirmation was damaging enough that Black announced he would step down as Apollo CEO, and he later left the chairman role as well.<br /><br />The shockwave did not stop with Black’s exit. Apollo had to reassure investors, clients, and partners that Epstein’s relationship was with Black personally and not with the firm, while also overhauling governance and moving leadership to Marc Rowan. Years later, the issue is still haunting Apollo, with the firm again telling clients in 2026 that no one at Apollo other than Black had a business or personal relationship with Epstein, while shareholder litigation has accused Apollo and its leaders of misleading investors about the depth of Epstein-related ties. Black’s Epstein relationship turned into a long-tail corporate contamination problem: it damaged Apollo’s brand, forced a leadership transition, triggered legal and investor scrutiny, and left the company repeatedly trying to prove that Epstein’s shadow stopped at Leon Black and did not extend into Apollo itself.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72773690</guid><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 08:15:01 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72773690/megaapolloglobalandepstein.mp3" length="66043864" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d2e001c8-7d1b-44bb-b41b-2df062425eee/d2e001c8-7d1b-44bb-b41b-2df062425eee.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d2e001c8-7d1b-44bb-b41b-2df062425eee/d2e001c8-7d1b-44bb-b41b-2df062425eee.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d2e001c8-7d1b-44bb-b41b-2df062425eee/d2e001c8-7d1b-44bb-b41b-2df062425eee.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jeffrey Epstein’s relationship with Leon Black detonated inside Apollo Global Management because Black was not just any executive — he was Apollo’s co-founder, chairman, and public face. Once it became clear that Black had paid Epstein enormous sums...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein’s relationship with Leon Black detonated inside Apollo Global Management because Black was not just any executive — he was Apollo’s co-founder, chairman, and public face. Once it became clear that Black had paid Epstein enormous sums after Epstein’s 2008 conviction, Apollo had a reputational crisis on its hands. The firm launched an independent review through its board’s conflicts committee, which examined Black’s relationship with Epstein and whether Apollo itself had business ties to Epstein. The review said it found no evidence that Black was involved in Epstein’s criminal conduct and said Apollo had not retained Epstein, but it also confirmed that Black paid Epstein huge fees for personal tax and estate-planning advice. That confirmation was damaging enough that Black announced he would step down as Apollo CEO, and he later left the chairman role as well.<br /><br />The shockwave did not stop with Black’s exit. Apollo had to reassure investors, clients, and partners that Epstein’s relationship was with Black personally and not with the firm, while also overhauling governance and moving leadership to Marc Rowan. Years later, the issue is still haunting Apollo, with the firm again telling clients in 2026 that no one at Apollo other than Black had a business or personal relationship with Epstein, while shareholder litigation has accused Apollo and its leaders of misleading investors about the depth of Epstein-related ties. Black’s Epstein relationship turned into a long-tail corporate contamination problem: it damaged Apollo’s brand, forced a leadership transition, triggered legal and investor scrutiny, and left the company repeatedly trying to prove that Epstein’s shadow stopped at Leon Black and did not extend into Apollo itself.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4128</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Denise George And The Epstein Money Chase In The USVI (7/1/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-denise-george-and-the-epstein-money-chase-in-the-usvi-7-1-26--72773689</link><description><![CDATA[Denise George tried to attack Jeffrey Epstein’s operation through the money trail, not just the sex-abuse allegations, by using the U.S. Virgin Islands’ civil enforcement power to subpoena banks and financial institutions that handled Epstein’s accounts, entities, trusts, charities, and shell companies. Her office sought records from major institutions including JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank, Citibank, and others, looking for account records, transaction details, communications, cash movements, and the financial architecture around Epstein’s estate and business entities. George later sued JPMorgan, accusing the bank of helping Epstein finance and conceal his trafficking operation, and her office had already reached a settlement of more than $105 million with Epstein’s estate and related defendants. In other words, she was trying to prove that Epstein’s crimes were not just enabled by recruiters and household staff, but by banks, lawyers, accountants, and institutions that moved the money and ignored the warning signs.<br /><br />A separate financial trail later raised similar questions around Ghislaine Maxwell. Reuters reported in 2026 that UBS helped move money connected to Maxwell before her arrest, including funds that ultimately helped purchase her secluded New Hampshire hideout, even after UBS had received a grand jury subpoena seeking information about her financial dealings in a child-sex-trafficking investigation. UBS had told Maxwell it would close her accounts, but documents showed millions still moved through the system before the shutdown was complete. That is what makes the institutional side of the Epstein story so damning: while George was trying to force major banks to explain how Epstein’s money flowed for years, other institutions were still handling Maxwell-linked money in the aftermath, showing once again how elite clients could remain bankable long after the red flags should have been impossible to miss.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72773689</guid><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 06:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72773689/megadenisegeorgeepsteinmoneytrail.mp3" length="60599976" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/56f8883f-cdcd-4eb4-af93-9d7f428fee41/56f8883f-cdcd-4eb4-af93-9d7f428fee41.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/56f8883f-cdcd-4eb4-af93-9d7f428fee41/56f8883f-cdcd-4eb4-af93-9d7f428fee41.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/56f8883f-cdcd-4eb4-af93-9d7f428fee41/56f8883f-cdcd-4eb4-af93-9d7f428fee41.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Denise George tried to attack Jeffrey Epstein’s operation through the money trail, not just the sex-abuse allegations, by using the U.S. Virgin Islands’ civil enforcement power to subpoena banks and financial institutions that handled Epstein’s...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Denise George tried to attack Jeffrey Epstein’s operation through the money trail, not just the sex-abuse allegations, by using the U.S. Virgin Islands’ civil enforcement power to subpoena banks and financial institutions that handled Epstein’s accounts, entities, trusts, charities, and shell companies. Her office sought records from major institutions including JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank, Citibank, and others, looking for account records, transaction details, communications, cash movements, and the financial architecture around Epstein’s estate and business entities. George later sued JPMorgan, accusing the bank of helping Epstein finance and conceal his trafficking operation, and her office had already reached a settlement of more than $105 million with Epstein’s estate and related defendants. In other words, she was trying to prove that Epstein’s crimes were not just enabled by recruiters and household staff, but by banks, lawyers, accountants, and institutions that moved the money and ignored the warning signs.<br /><br />A separate financial trail later raised similar questions around Ghislaine Maxwell. Reuters reported in 2026 that UBS helped move money connected to Maxwell before her arrest, including funds that ultimately helped purchase her secluded New Hampshire hideout, even after UBS had received a grand jury subpoena seeking information about her financial dealings in a child-sex-trafficking investigation. UBS had told Maxwell it would close her accounts, but documents showed millions still moved through the system before the shutdown was complete. That is what makes the institutional side of the Epstein story so damning: while George was trying to force major banks to explain how Epstein’s money flowed for years, other institutions were still handling Maxwell-linked money in the aftermath, showing once again how elite clients could remain bankable long after the red flags should have been impossible to miss.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3788</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Inside The OIG Interview:  The Testimony Of An Unnamed MCC Lieutenant (Part 7)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/inside-the-oig-interview-the-testimony-of-an-unnamed-mcc-lieutenant-part-7--72764212</link><description><![CDATA[The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command responsibilities, and awareness of Epstein’s status—the lieutenant repeatedly falls back on vague answers, limited recollection, or an inability to provide specifics. This pattern isn’t occasional—it’s consistent, especially on the exact points where clarity matters most. Rather than offering firm timelines or accountability, the testimony often drifts into generalities, creating the impression that either key information was not retained or not being fully disclosed.<br /><br />That evasiveness becomes even more glaring when discussing the hours leading up to and immediately following Epstein’s death. Questions about whether protocols were followed, who was responsible for monitoring, and how breakdowns occurred are met with uncertainty or deflection, leaving major gaps in the narrative. Instead of clarifying what went wrong, the testimony reinforces the sense of confusion and lack of oversight already seen in other MCC accounts. The result is a record that feels less like a clear explanation and more like a fragmented, incomplete account—one that raises as many questions about credibility and accountability as it answers about the failures inside the facility.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00062649.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00062649.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72764212</guid><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 04:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72764212/mccoiglieutenant7.mp3" length="13935639" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d221448d-3299-442e-ac35-0e09610f99e6/d221448d-3299-442e-ac35-0e09610f99e6.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d221448d-3299-442e-ac35-0e09610f99e6/d221448d-3299-442e-ac35-0e09610f99e6.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d221448d-3299-442e-ac35-0e09610f99e6/d221448d-3299-442e-ac35-0e09610f99e6.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command responsibilities, and awareness of Epstein’s status—the lieutenant repeatedly falls back on vague answers, limited recollection, or an inability to provide specifics. This pattern isn’t occasional—it’s consistent, especially on the exact points where clarity matters most. Rather than offering firm timelines or accountability, the testimony often drifts into generalities, creating the impression that either key information was not retained or not being fully disclosed.<br /><br />That evasiveness becomes even more glaring when discussing the hours leading up to and immediately following Epstein’s death. Questions about whether protocols were followed, who was responsible for monitoring, and how breakdowns occurred are met with uncertainty or deflection, leaving major gaps in the narrative. Instead of clarifying what went wrong, the testimony reinforces the sense of confusion and lack of oversight already seen in other MCC accounts. The result is a record that feels less like a clear explanation and more like a fragmented, incomplete account—one that raises as many questions about credibility and accountability as it answers about the failures inside the facility.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00062649.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00062649.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>871</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Inside The OIG Interview:  The Testimony Of An Unnamed MCC Lieutenant (Part 6)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/inside-the-oig-interview-the-testimony-of-an-unnamed-mcc-lieutenant-part-6--72764263</link><description><![CDATA[The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command responsibilities, and awareness of Epstein’s status—the lieutenant repeatedly falls back on vague answers, limited recollection, or an inability to provide specifics. This pattern isn’t occasional—it’s consistent, especially on the exact points where clarity matters most. Rather than offering firm timelines or accountability, the testimony often drifts into generalities, creating the impression that either key information was not retained or not being fully disclosed.<br /><br />That evasiveness becomes even more glaring when discussing the hours leading up to and immediately following Epstein’s death. Questions about whether protocols were followed, who was responsible for monitoring, and how breakdowns occurred are met with uncertainty or deflection, leaving major gaps in the narrative. Instead of clarifying what went wrong, the testimony reinforces the sense of confusion and lack of oversight already seen in other MCC accounts. The result is a record that feels less like a clear explanation and more like a fragmented, incomplete account—one that raises as many questions about credibility and accountability as it answers about the failures inside the facility.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00062649.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00062649.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72764263</guid><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 02:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72764263/mccoiglieutenant6.mp3" length="12215737" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/71b47ef8-63c7-424d-90f5-a03affe56d69/71b47ef8-63c7-424d-90f5-a03affe56d69.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/71b47ef8-63c7-424d-90f5-a03affe56d69/71b47ef8-63c7-424d-90f5-a03affe56d69.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/71b47ef8-63c7-424d-90f5-a03affe56d69/71b47ef8-63c7-424d-90f5-a03affe56d69.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command responsibilities, and awareness of Epstein’s status—the lieutenant repeatedly falls back on vague answers, limited recollection, or an inability to provide specifics. This pattern isn’t occasional—it’s consistent, especially on the exact points where clarity matters most. Rather than offering firm timelines or accountability, the testimony often drifts into generalities, creating the impression that either key information was not retained or not being fully disclosed.<br /><br />That evasiveness becomes even more glaring when discussing the hours leading up to and immediately following Epstein’s death. Questions about whether protocols were followed, who was responsible for monitoring, and how breakdowns occurred are met with uncertainty or deflection, leaving major gaps in the narrative. Instead of clarifying what went wrong, the testimony reinforces the sense of confusion and lack of oversight already seen in other MCC accounts. The result is a record that feels less like a clear explanation and more like a fragmented, incomplete account—one that raises as many questions about credibility and accountability as it answers about the failures inside the facility.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00062649.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00062649.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>764</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Inside The OIG Interview:  The Testimony Of An Unnamed MCC Lieutenant (Part 5)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/inside-the-oig-interview-the-testimony-of-an-unnamed-mcc-lieutenant-part-5--72764213</link><description><![CDATA[The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command responsibilities, and awareness of Epstein’s status—the lieutenant repeatedly falls back on vague answers, limited recollection, or an inability to provide specifics. This pattern isn’t occasional—it’s consistent, especially on the exact points where clarity matters most. Rather than offering firm timelines or accountability, the testimony often drifts into generalities, creating the impression that either key information was not retained or not being fully disclosed.<br /><br />That evasiveness becomes even more glaring when discussing the hours leading up to and immediately following Epstein’s death. Questions about whether protocols were followed, who was responsible for monitoring, and how breakdowns occurred are met with uncertainty or deflection, leaving major gaps in the narrative. Instead of clarifying what went wrong, the testimony reinforces the sense of confusion and lack of oversight already seen in other MCC accounts. The result is a record that feels less like a clear explanation and more like a fragmented, incomplete account—one that raises as many questions about credibility and accountability as it answers about the failures inside the facility.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00062649.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00062649.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72764213</guid><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72764213/mccoiglieutenant5.mp3" length="13690297" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/92fe3491-7631-42c2-a64f-7ffc6a47d1a7/92fe3491-7631-42c2-a64f-7ffc6a47d1a7.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/92fe3491-7631-42c2-a64f-7ffc6a47d1a7/92fe3491-7631-42c2-a64f-7ffc6a47d1a7.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/92fe3491-7631-42c2-a64f-7ffc6a47d1a7/92fe3491-7631-42c2-a64f-7ffc6a47d1a7.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command responsibilities, and awareness of Epstein’s status—the lieutenant repeatedly falls back on vague answers, limited recollection, or an inability to provide specifics. This pattern isn’t occasional—it’s consistent, especially on the exact points where clarity matters most. Rather than offering firm timelines or accountability, the testimony often drifts into generalities, creating the impression that either key information was not retained or not being fully disclosed.<br /><br />That evasiveness becomes even more glaring when discussing the hours leading up to and immediately following Epstein’s death. Questions about whether protocols were followed, who was responsible for monitoring, and how breakdowns occurred are met with uncertainty or deflection, leaving major gaps in the narrative. Instead of clarifying what went wrong, the testimony reinforces the sense of confusion and lack of oversight already seen in other MCC accounts. The result is a record that feels less like a clear explanation and more like a fragmented, incomplete account—one that raises as many questions about credibility and accountability as it answers about the failures inside the facility.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00062649.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00062649.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>856</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Inside The OIG Interview:  The Testimony Of An Unnamed MCC Lieutenant (Part 4)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/inside-the-oig-interview-the-testimony-of-an-unnamed-mcc-lieutenant-part-4--72764211</link><description><![CDATA[The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command responsibilities, and awareness of Epstein’s status—the lieutenant repeatedly falls back on vague answers, limited recollection, or an inability to provide specifics. This pattern isn’t occasional—it’s consistent, especially on the exact points where clarity matters most. Rather than offering firm timelines or accountability, the testimony often drifts into generalities, creating the impression that either key information was not retained or not being fully disclosed.<br /><br />That evasiveness becomes even more glaring when discussing the hours leading up to and immediately following Epstein’s death. Questions about whether protocols were followed, who was responsible for monitoring, and how breakdowns occurred are met with uncertainty or deflection, leaving major gaps in the narrative. Instead of clarifying what went wrong, the testimony reinforces the sense of confusion and lack of oversight already seen in other MCC accounts. The result is a record that feels less like a clear explanation and more like a fragmented, incomplete account—one that raises as many questions about credibility and accountability as it answers about the failures inside the facility.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00062649.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00062649.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72764211</guid><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 22:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72764211/mccoiglieutenant4.mp3" length="12521683" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6b49d4c0-12bb-464e-a3d1-d35864f4eb84/6b49d4c0-12bb-464e-a3d1-d35864f4eb84.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6b49d4c0-12bb-464e-a3d1-d35864f4eb84/6b49d4c0-12bb-464e-a3d1-d35864f4eb84.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6b49d4c0-12bb-464e-a3d1-d35864f4eb84/6b49d4c0-12bb-464e-a3d1-d35864f4eb84.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command responsibilities, and awareness of Epstein’s status—the lieutenant repeatedly falls back on vague answers, limited recollection, or an inability to provide specifics. This pattern isn’t occasional—it’s consistent, especially on the exact points where clarity matters most. Rather than offering firm timelines or accountability, the testimony often drifts into generalities, creating the impression that either key information was not retained or not being fully disclosed.<br /><br />That evasiveness becomes even more glaring when discussing the hours leading up to and immediately following Epstein’s death. Questions about whether protocols were followed, who was responsible for monitoring, and how breakdowns occurred are met with uncertainty or deflection, leaving major gaps in the narrative. Instead of clarifying what went wrong, the testimony reinforces the sense of confusion and lack of oversight already seen in other MCC accounts. The result is a record that feels less like a clear explanation and more like a fragmented, incomplete account—one that raises as many questions about credibility and accountability as it answers about the failures inside the facility.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00062649.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00062649.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>783</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Bill Gates Epstein Related Congressional Transcripts (Part 9) (6/30/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-bill-gates-epstein-related-congressional-transcripts-part-9-6-30-26--72757805</link><description><![CDATA[<br />The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates testified that he met Epstein roughly 12 to 14 times between 2011 and 2014, saying he believed Epstein could help attract major philanthropic donations to global health initiatives through the Gates Foundation. He repeatedly described those meetings as "a mistake," insisted he never visited Epstein's private island, New Mexico ranch, or Florida residence, and said he never witnessed criminal conduct or participated in any of Epstein's illegal activities. Gates told lawmakers he ultimately concluded that Epstein had exaggerated both his financial connections and his ability to raise money for philanthropy.<br /><br /><br />One of the most closely watched portions of the transcript concerned allegations that Epstein sought to pressure Gates using knowledge of Gates' personal life. Gates acknowledged several extramarital affairs and testified that Epstein appeared to have learned about them, later making what Gates described as "veiled" attempts at blackmail by referencing those relationships and seeking money connected to one of the women. Gates said he believed Epstein "contemplated" blackmail but maintained he was never actually blackmailed, never paid Epstein to keep information secret, and never committed crimes with him. Throughout the interview, Gates emphasized that his association with Epstein damaged his judgment and reputation, expressed support for releasing the Epstein files and for continued investigations, and said survivors deserve justice while denying any involvement in Epstein's trafficking operation or abuse of minors.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72757805</guid><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 20:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72757805/gatestranscript9.mp3" length="13774306" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/12962e65-cdb8-4819-be50-9747d470079e/12962e65-cdb8-4819-be50-9747d470079e.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/12962e65-cdb8-4819-be50-9747d470079e/12962e65-cdb8-4819-be50-9747d470079e.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/12962e65-cdb8-4819-be50-9747d470079e/12962e65-cdb8-4819-be50-9747d470079e.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br />The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates testified that he met Epstein roughly 12 to 14 times between 2011 and 2014, saying he believed Epstein could help attract major philanthropic donations to global health initiatives through the Gates Foundation. He repeatedly described those meetings as "a mistake," insisted he never visited Epstein's private island, New Mexico ranch, or Florida residence, and said he never witnessed criminal conduct or participated in any of Epstein's illegal activities. Gates told lawmakers he ultimately concluded that Epstein had exaggerated both his financial connections and his ability to raise money for philanthropy.<br /><br /><br />One of the most closely watched portions of the transcript concerned allegations that Epstein sought to pressure Gates using knowledge of Gates' personal life. Gates acknowledged several extramarital affairs and testified that Epstein appeared to have learned about them, later making what Gates described as "veiled" attempts at blackmail by referencing those relationships and seeking money connected to one of the women. Gates said he believed Epstein "contemplated" blackmail but maintained he was never actually blackmailed, never paid Epstein to keep information secret, and never committed crimes with him. Throughout the interview, Gates emphasized that his association with Epstein damaged his judgment and reputation, expressed support for releasing the Epstein files and for continued investigations, and said survivors deserve justice while denying any involvement in Epstein's trafficking operation or abuse of minors.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>861</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Doug Band Set And The Trip To Congress (7/1/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/doug-band-set-and-the-trip-to-congress-7-1-26--72771545</link><description><![CDATA[Sarah Ferguson, the Duchess of York, reportedly visited Jeffrey Epstein twice in 2009 while he was serving his Florida jail sentence for soliciting a minor for prostitution. The visits allegedly took place at the Palm Beach office Epstein used during his controversial work-release arrangement, which allowed him to leave jail for hours each day. Emails released by the Justice Department and reported by The Telegraph described Ferguson contacting Epstein during a Florida layover and arranging to meet him, including references to his driver picking her up and her bringing charity-related documents. The office was tied to the Florida Science Foundation, a company Epstein used as the basis for his work-release setup.<br /><br />The emails also showed Ferguson writing warmly to Epstein, calling him a “dear spectacular and special friend,” thanking him for looking after her, and continuing to discuss contact and assistance from him despite his conviction. The revelations added to earlier scrutiny over Epstein helping Ferguson financially, including the previously reported £15,000 payment she later called a “gigantic error of judgment.” The damaging part is the timing: Epstein was not merely a disgraced financier at that point, he was actively serving a sentence connected to a minor, yet Ferguson still allegedly met with him through a work-release loophole that has since become one of the most notorious examples of how Epstein received special treatment.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-15933067/Sarah-Ferguson-visited-Epstein-twice-office.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Sarah Ferguson visited Epstein TWICE at office for a bogus firm he set up while he was serving prison sentence for child sex offence | Daily Mail Online</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72771545</guid><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 18:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72771545/dougbandsetforcongress.mp3" length="11671136" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f5017003-7dfa-435d-922d-a1d5a59fb3a6/f5017003-7dfa-435d-922d-a1d5a59fb3a6.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f5017003-7dfa-435d-922d-a1d5a59fb3a6/f5017003-7dfa-435d-922d-a1d5a59fb3a6.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f5017003-7dfa-435d-922d-a1d5a59fb3a6/f5017003-7dfa-435d-922d-a1d5a59fb3a6.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Sarah Ferguson, the Duchess of York, reportedly visited Jeffrey Epstein twice in 2009 while he was serving his Florida jail sentence for soliciting a minor for prostitution. The visits allegedly took place at the Palm Beach office Epstein used during...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Sarah Ferguson, the Duchess of York, reportedly visited Jeffrey Epstein twice in 2009 while he was serving his Florida jail sentence for soliciting a minor for prostitution. The visits allegedly took place at the Palm Beach office Epstein used during his controversial work-release arrangement, which allowed him to leave jail for hours each day. Emails released by the Justice Department and reported by The Telegraph described Ferguson contacting Epstein during a Florida layover and arranging to meet him, including references to his driver picking her up and her bringing charity-related documents. The office was tied to the Florida Science Foundation, a company Epstein used as the basis for his work-release setup.<br /><br />The emails also showed Ferguson writing warmly to Epstein, calling him a “dear spectacular and special friend,” thanking him for looking after her, and continuing to discuss contact and assistance from him despite his conviction. The revelations added to earlier scrutiny over Epstein helping Ferguson financially, including the previously reported £15,000 payment she later called a “gigantic error of judgment.” The damaging part is the timing: Epstein was not merely a disgraced financier at that point, he was actively serving a sentence connected to a minor, yet Ferguson still allegedly met with him through a work-release loophole that has since become one of the most notorious examples of how Epstein received special treatment.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-15933067/Sarah-Ferguson-visited-Epstein-twice-office.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Sarah Ferguson visited Epstein TWICE at office for a bogus firm he set up while he was serving prison sentence for child sex offence | Daily Mail Online</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>730</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Murder In Moselle: Othram, Genetic Genealogy, and the Defense’s New Murdaugh Strategy (7/1/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moselle-othram-genetic-genealogy-and-the-defense-s-new-murdaugh-strategy-7-1-26--72771517</link><description><![CDATA[South Carolina prosecutors are pushing back against Alex Murdaugh’s defense team as he prepares for a retrial in the murders of his wife, Maggie, and son, Paul. The fight centers on a defense request for independent testing of DNA found under Maggie Murdaugh’s fingernails, specifically her left fingernail clippings. Murdaugh’s lawyers argue the sample included DNA from an unknown unrelated male and want it sent to Othram, a forensic genetic genealogy lab, at Murdaugh’s expense. Prosecutors counter that SLED already tested the evidence and found only Maggie’s DNA mixed with what they described as a “very partial and incomplete” profile from another contributor, not enough to upload to CODIS. They also argue that trace or touch DNA under fingernails does not automatically mean a struggle took place, because it can be transferred through ordinary contact, objects, or the environment, and they noted Maggie had her nails done the day she was killed.<br /><br />The state also opposed Murdaugh’s request to use a secure prison laptop to review case materials, arguing he should not be trusted with unsupervised electronic access behind bars. Prosecutors pointed to prior disciplinary issues involving alleged misuse of a prison tablet, unauthorized use of another inmate’s PIN, and a previous contraband issue involving a book allegedly passed to him through defense staff. Judge Debra McCaslin did not immediately rule on the DNA issue and told the defense to clarify whether the remaining sample is viable for further testing. On the laptop issue, she indicated the prison warden would not allow Murdaugh to keep one in his cell because of safety concerns, but suggested his attorneys could bring a laptop to a conference room and review materials with him under supervision. The larger backdrop is that Murdaugh is headed for a retrial after the South Carolina Supreme Court overturned his murder convictions in May, finding that former clerk of court Becky Hill’s conduct had tainted the jury.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.foxnews.com/true-crime/alex-murdaugh-faces-state-pushback-maggie-dna-testing-prison-laptop-request" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Alex Murdaugh DNA testing opposed by prosecutors ahead of retrial | Fox News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72771517</guid><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 16:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72771517/murdaughdnabattle.mp3" length="10071606" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cdd19664-c9ca-4c67-bd44-775d6595d2db/cdd19664-c9ca-4c67-bd44-775d6595d2db.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cdd19664-c9ca-4c67-bd44-775d6595d2db/cdd19664-c9ca-4c67-bd44-775d6595d2db.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cdd19664-c9ca-4c67-bd44-775d6595d2db/cdd19664-c9ca-4c67-bd44-775d6595d2db.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>South Carolina prosecutors are pushing back against Alex Murdaugh’s defense team as he prepares for a retrial in the murders of his wife, Maggie, and son, Paul. The fight centers on a defense request for independent testing of DNA found under Maggie...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[South Carolina prosecutors are pushing back against Alex Murdaugh’s defense team as he prepares for a retrial in the murders of his wife, Maggie, and son, Paul. The fight centers on a defense request for independent testing of DNA found under Maggie Murdaugh’s fingernails, specifically her left fingernail clippings. Murdaugh’s lawyers argue the sample included DNA from an unknown unrelated male and want it sent to Othram, a forensic genetic genealogy lab, at Murdaugh’s expense. Prosecutors counter that SLED already tested the evidence and found only Maggie’s DNA mixed with what they described as a “very partial and incomplete” profile from another contributor, not enough to upload to CODIS. They also argue that trace or touch DNA under fingernails does not automatically mean a struggle took place, because it can be transferred through ordinary contact, objects, or the environment, and they noted Maggie had her nails done the day she was killed.<br /><br />The state also opposed Murdaugh’s request to use a secure prison laptop to review case materials, arguing he should not be trusted with unsupervised electronic access behind bars. Prosecutors pointed to prior disciplinary issues involving alleged misuse of a prison tablet, unauthorized use of another inmate’s PIN, and a previous contraband issue involving a book allegedly passed to him through defense staff. Judge Debra McCaslin did not immediately rule on the DNA issue and told the defense to clarify whether the remaining sample is viable for further testing. On the laptop issue, she indicated the prison warden would not allow Murdaugh to keep one in his cell because of safety concerns, but suggested his attorneys could bring a laptop to a conference room and review materials with him under supervision. The larger backdrop is that Murdaugh is headed for a retrial after the South Carolina Supreme Court overturned his murder convictions in May, finding that former clerk of court Becky Hill’s conduct had tainted the jury.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.foxnews.com/true-crime/alex-murdaugh-faces-state-pushback-maggie-dna-testing-prison-laptop-request" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Alex Murdaugh DNA testing opposed by prosecutors ahead of retrial | Fox News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>630</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>alexmurdaugh,breakingnews,breakingnewsreports,breakingnewsupdate,dailynews,dailynewsupdates,murdaugh,murdaughmurders,murdaughtrial,news,newsbreaks,newsbriefs,newscommentary,newsreport,newsupdate,newsupdates,southcarolina,truecrime,yourdailyupdate,yournewsyourworld</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Warren Buffett Pauses Gates Foundation Donation Amid Epstein Review (7/1/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/warren-buffett-pauses-gates-foundation-donation-amid-epstein-review-7-1-26--72771076</link><description><![CDATA[Warren Buffett has reportedly paused his usual mid-year donation to the Gates Foundation while he waits for the results of an outside review into the foundation’s past ties to Jeffrey Epstein. Buffett has given more than $47 billion in Berkshire Hathaway stock to the foundation over the years, making him one of its most important donors, but renewed scrutiny of Bill Gates’ relationship with Epstein has now put that giving under a cloud. The review was ordered by Gates Foundation CEO Mark Suzman after recently released Justice Department emails showed Epstein communicating with foundation staff and trying to insert himself into Gates-linked philanthropy.<br /><br />Bill Gates has said his meetings with Epstein were about philanthropy and global health funding, while also admitting the relationship was a mistake. During private testimony to House Oversight lawmakers, Gates reportedly said Epstein later tried to pressure him using knowledge of Gates’ extramarital affairs, though Gates denied witnessing criminal activity. Buffett’s decision to hold back until the review is complete shows how Epstein’s fallout is still reaching into the highest levels of philanthropy, raising questions about what the Gates Foundation knew, how close Epstein got to its network, and whether one of its biggest benefactors is willing to keep writing massive checks without clearer answers.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/warren-buffett-bill-gates-foundation-donation-epstein-b3005700.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Warren Buffett freezes Gates Foundation donation as Epstein questions resurface: report | The Independent</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72771076</guid><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 14:15:01 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72771076/buffetpullsbackfromgates.mp3" length="10678065" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/660a8616-d7fc-45cc-89b4-3f1d55dff2ef/660a8616-d7fc-45cc-89b4-3f1d55dff2ef.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/660a8616-d7fc-45cc-89b4-3f1d55dff2ef/660a8616-d7fc-45cc-89b4-3f1d55dff2ef.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/660a8616-d7fc-45cc-89b4-3f1d55dff2ef/660a8616-d7fc-45cc-89b4-3f1d55dff2ef.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Warren Buffett has reportedly paused his usual mid-year donation to the Gates Foundation while he waits for the results of an outside review into the foundation’s past ties to Jeffrey Epstein. Buffett has given more than $47 billion in Berkshire...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Warren Buffett has reportedly paused his usual mid-year donation to the Gates Foundation while he waits for the results of an outside review into the foundation’s past ties to Jeffrey Epstein. Buffett has given more than $47 billion in Berkshire Hathaway stock to the foundation over the years, making him one of its most important donors, but renewed scrutiny of Bill Gates’ relationship with Epstein has now put that giving under a cloud. The review was ordered by Gates Foundation CEO Mark Suzman after recently released Justice Department emails showed Epstein communicating with foundation staff and trying to insert himself into Gates-linked philanthropy.<br /><br />Bill Gates has said his meetings with Epstein were about philanthropy and global health funding, while also admitting the relationship was a mistake. During private testimony to House Oversight lawmakers, Gates reportedly said Epstein later tried to pressure him using knowledge of Gates’ extramarital affairs, though Gates denied witnessing criminal activity. Buffett’s decision to hold back until the review is complete shows how Epstein’s fallout is still reaching into the highest levels of philanthropy, raising questions about what the Gates Foundation knew, how close Epstein got to its network, and whether one of its biggest benefactors is willing to keep writing massive checks without clearer answers.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/warren-buffett-bill-gates-foundation-donation-epstein-b3005700.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Warren Buffett freezes Gates Foundation donation as Epstein questions resurface: report | The Independent</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>668</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Lesley Groff Grilled Over Epstein’s American Express Travel Records  (7/1/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/lesley-groff-grilled-over-epstein-s-american-express-travel-records-7-1-26--72769773</link><description><![CDATA[Lesley Groff, Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime assistant, was questioned by House Oversight lawmakers about Epstein’s use of American Express to book travel for multiple women or girls. CBS reported that Epstein used Amex’s Centurion travel service and a Black Card to arrange hundreds of itineraries, many involving women or girls from Eastern Europe, and that Groff was a key point of contact in those bookings. Groff told lawmakers she did not believe she ever arranged travel for anyone under 18 and said she understood the women to be “traveling assistants” who worked for Epstein. She also denied knowing that any of the travel was connected to sexual activity involving Epstein or anyone in his network.<br /><br />Lawmakers pressed Groff on records that appeared to show “decoy flights,” including a 2016 email where she asked Amex to hold a fake Rome-to-London itinerary for a redacted person who would actually be traveling to Miami to see Epstein. Groff said the woman wanted to hide the real trip from her parents, not obtain a visa, while her attorney pushed back on the idea that the booking was visa-related. In another 2012 exchange, an Amex employee flagged that holding a refundable itinerary for visa purposes was against company policy, but Groff later told lawmakers she was simply arranging a ticket and hotel reservation for someone who needed a visa. American Express declined to comment on Groff’s testimony, but previously said it regretted having Epstein as a customer and terminated his account after federal charges were filed.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/epstein-longtime-assistant-grilled-lawmakers-amex-travel-women-girls/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein's longtime assistant grilled by U.S. lawmakers over Amex travel booked for women or girls - CBS News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72769773</guid><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 12:15:01 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72769773/groffamexblackcard.mp3" length="13585807" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0721e540-6fc7-4100-954b-aac730616a22/0721e540-6fc7-4100-954b-aac730616a22.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0721e540-6fc7-4100-954b-aac730616a22/0721e540-6fc7-4100-954b-aac730616a22.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0721e540-6fc7-4100-954b-aac730616a22/0721e540-6fc7-4100-954b-aac730616a22.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Lesley Groff, Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime assistant, was questioned by House Oversight lawmakers about Epstein’s use of American Express to book travel for multiple women or girls. CBS reported that Epstein used Amex’s Centurion travel service and a...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Lesley Groff, Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime assistant, was questioned by House Oversight lawmakers about Epstein’s use of American Express to book travel for multiple women or girls. CBS reported that Epstein used Amex’s Centurion travel service and a Black Card to arrange hundreds of itineraries, many involving women or girls from Eastern Europe, and that Groff was a key point of contact in those bookings. Groff told lawmakers she did not believe she ever arranged travel for anyone under 18 and said she understood the women to be “traveling assistants” who worked for Epstein. She also denied knowing that any of the travel was connected to sexual activity involving Epstein or anyone in his network.<br /><br />Lawmakers pressed Groff on records that appeared to show “decoy flights,” including a 2016 email where she asked Amex to hold a fake Rome-to-London itinerary for a redacted person who would actually be traveling to Miami to see Epstein. Groff said the woman wanted to hide the real trip from her parents, not obtain a visa, while her attorney pushed back on the idea that the booking was visa-related. In another 2012 exchange, an Amex employee flagged that holding a refundable itinerary for visa purposes was against company policy, but Groff later told lawmakers she was simply arranging a ticket and hotel reservation for someone who needed a visa. American Express declined to comment on Groff’s testimony, but previously said it regretted having Epstein as a customer and terminated his account after federal charges were filed.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/epstein-longtime-assistant-grilled-lawmakers-amex-travel-women-girls/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein's longtime assistant grilled by U.S. lawmakers over Amex travel booked for women or girls - CBS News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>850</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   Melanie Walker, Bill Gates And The Epstein Factor (7/1/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-melanie-walker-bill-gates-and-the-epstein-factor-7-1-26--72759136</link><description><![CDATA[Melanie Walker is a physician and neuroscience/global-health figure who worked in Bill Gates’ orbit while also having long-running ties to Jeffrey Epstein. She joined the Gates Foundation in 2006 as a senior program officer and later remained connected to Gates through consulting work and health-related proposals. Reporting from The Wall Street Journal described her as a confidante to both Gates and Epstein, while her lawyer said she was a “survivor of Jeffrey Epstein” who had endured a coercive relationship with him over decades. Walker has not been accused of wrongdoing, but her name matters because she sat at a strange intersection between Epstein’s science-and-philanthropy access game and Gates’ foundation world.<br /><br /><br />Walker fits into the Gates/Epstein fiasco because she appears to have been one of the human bridges between the two men’s worlds, and later one of the people warning Gates about Epstein. Forbes, citing Journal reporting, said Walker emailed Gates in 2014 advising him to keep “a healthy distance” from Epstein on anything personal, warning that she had seen Epstein exploit powerful people’s weaknesses. The Journal also reported that Epstein encouraged Walker to pursue a sexual relationship with Gates, while Gates’ spokesperson said Gates did not know the nature of Walker’s relationship with Epstein and described Walker’s relationship with Gates as consensual and amicably ended. In short, Walker is not presented as an accused participant in Epstein’s crimes; she is presented as a complicated connective figure whose relationships with both men show how Epstein tried to burrow into Gates’ world through philanthropy, science, personal access, and leverage.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72759136</guid><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72759136/megagateswalkerepstein.mp3" length="47669542" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c79bcb77-0c4b-4e6f-a6e2-772ee4c96450/c79bcb77-0c4b-4e6f-a6e2-772ee4c96450.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c79bcb77-0c4b-4e6f-a6e2-772ee4c96450/c79bcb77-0c4b-4e6f-a6e2-772ee4c96450.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c79bcb77-0c4b-4e6f-a6e2-772ee4c96450/c79bcb77-0c4b-4e6f-a6e2-772ee4c96450.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Melanie Walker is a physician and neuroscience/global-health figure who worked in Bill Gates’ orbit while also having long-running ties to Jeffrey Epstein. She joined the Gates Foundation in 2006 as a senior program officer and later remained...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Melanie Walker is a physician and neuroscience/global-health figure who worked in Bill Gates’ orbit while also having long-running ties to Jeffrey Epstein. She joined the Gates Foundation in 2006 as a senior program officer and later remained connected to Gates through consulting work and health-related proposals. Reporting from The Wall Street Journal described her as a confidante to both Gates and Epstein, while her lawyer said she was a “survivor of Jeffrey Epstein” who had endured a coercive relationship with him over decades. Walker has not been accused of wrongdoing, but her name matters because she sat at a strange intersection between Epstein’s science-and-philanthropy access game and Gates’ foundation world.<br /><br /><br />Walker fits into the Gates/Epstein fiasco because she appears to have been one of the human bridges between the two men’s worlds, and later one of the people warning Gates about Epstein. Forbes, citing Journal reporting, said Walker emailed Gates in 2014 advising him to keep “a healthy distance” from Epstein on anything personal, warning that she had seen Epstein exploit powerful people’s weaknesses. The Journal also reported that Epstein encouraged Walker to pursue a sexual relationship with Gates, while Gates’ spokesperson said Gates did not know the nature of Walker’s relationship with Epstein and described Walker’s relationship with Gates as consensual and amicably ended. In short, Walker is not presented as an accused participant in Epstein’s crimes; she is presented as a complicated connective figure whose relationships with both men show how Epstein tried to burrow into Gates’ world through philanthropy, science, personal access, and leverage.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2980</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Les Wexner Has Managed To Fly Under The Epstein Radar.  Until Now (6/30/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-les-wexner-has-managed-to-fly-under-the-epstein-radar-until-now-6-30-26--72759137</link><description><![CDATA[Les Wexner was one of the most important people in Jeffrey Epstein’s rise, yet for years he managed to remain far less publicly radioactive than figures like Ghislaine Maxwell, Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton, or Leon Black. Wexner gave Epstein extraordinary access, trusted him with financial power, and allowed him into the center of his personal and business world, including through power of attorney and the management of major assets. But after Epstein’s crimes became impossible to ignore, Wexner largely presented himself as someone who had been deceived, stolen from, and betrayed by Epstein. That framing helped him avoid the kind of sustained public grilling that other Epstein associates faced, even though Epstein’s proximity to Wexner helped give him wealth, legitimacy, and elite credibility.<br /><br />Les Wexner was one of the most important people in Jeffrey Epstein’s rise, yet for years he managed to remain far less publicly radioactive than figures like Ghislaine Maxwell, Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton, or Leon Black. Wexner gave Epstein extraordinary access, trusted him with financial power, and allowed him into the center of his personal and business world, including through power of attorney and the management of major assets. But after Epstein’s crimes became impossible to ignore, Wexner largely presented himself as someone who had been deceived, stolen from, and betrayed by Epstein. That framing helped him avoid the kind of sustained public grilling that other Epstein associates faced, even though Epstein’s proximity to Wexner helped give him wealth, legitimacy, and elite credibility.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contat me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72759137</guid><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72759137/megawexnerandhiskeyrole.mp3" length="47591802" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/aaa231da-3e5e-4b85-ba37-f84f9620020b/aaa231da-3e5e-4b85-ba37-f84f9620020b.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/aaa231da-3e5e-4b85-ba37-f84f9620020b/aaa231da-3e5e-4b85-ba37-f84f9620020b.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/aaa231da-3e5e-4b85-ba37-f84f9620020b/aaa231da-3e5e-4b85-ba37-f84f9620020b.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Les Wexner was one of the most important people in Jeffrey Epstein’s rise, yet for years he managed to remain far less publicly radioactive than figures like Ghislaine Maxwell, Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton, or Leon Black. Wexner gave Epstein...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Les Wexner was one of the most important people in Jeffrey Epstein’s rise, yet for years he managed to remain far less publicly radioactive than figures like Ghislaine Maxwell, Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton, or Leon Black. Wexner gave Epstein extraordinary access, trusted him with financial power, and allowed him into the center of his personal and business world, including through power of attorney and the management of major assets. But after Epstein’s crimes became impossible to ignore, Wexner largely presented himself as someone who had been deceived, stolen from, and betrayed by Epstein. That framing helped him avoid the kind of sustained public grilling that other Epstein associates faced, even though Epstein’s proximity to Wexner helped give him wealth, legitimacy, and elite credibility.<br /><br />Les Wexner was one of the most important people in Jeffrey Epstein’s rise, yet for years he managed to remain far less publicly radioactive than figures like Ghislaine Maxwell, Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton, or Leon Black. Wexner gave Epstein extraordinary access, trusted him with financial power, and allowed him into the center of his personal and business world, including through power of attorney and the management of major assets. But after Epstein’s crimes became impossible to ignore, Wexner largely presented himself as someone who had been deceived, stolen from, and betrayed by Epstein. That framing helped him avoid the kind of sustained public grilling that other Epstein associates faced, even though Epstein’s proximity to Wexner helped give him wealth, legitimacy, and elite credibility.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contat me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2975</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Jeffrey Epstein's Reign Of Terror Lasted A Lot Longer Than  First Thought (6/30/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-s-reign-of-terror-lasted-a-lot-longer-than-first-thought-6-30-26--72759135</link><description><![CDATA[<br />The extent of Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse turned out to be far larger than the early public version of the case suggested. At first, the story was often framed around a limited number of victims in Palm Beach and a wealthy sex offender who had somehow received an absurdly lenient plea deal. But as survivors came forward, lawsuits were filed, flight logs were examined, police records resurfaced, and federal prosecutors reopened the case, the scope expanded dramatically. Epstein was no longer just a rich creep abusing a few vulnerable girls in Florida; he was revealed as the center of a long-running, multi-state and international exploitation network involving Palm Beach, New York, New Mexico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Paris, private planes, luxury homes, recruiters, assistants, employees, and powerful people who either enabled him, ignored him, or benefited from being close to him.<br /><br />What made the scale so disturbing was not only the number of alleged victims, but the machinery around the abuse. Epstein allegedly relied on recruiters, schedulers, drivers, pilots, house staff, lawyers, bankers, financial advisers, modeling-world contacts, and social gatekeepers who helped keep his life moving while the abuse continued. Survivors described a system where girls and young women were moved through massages, travel, gifts, pressure, intimidation, and silence, while Epstein used money and status to make himself feel untouchable. The more records came out, the harder it became to believe the original narrow version of the case. This was not a contained scandal. It was a sprawling abuse operation that lasted for years because too many institutions failed, looked away, or decided that Jeffrey Epstein’s money mattered more than the girls he was hurting.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72759135</guid><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72759135/megauntoldamontofepsteinabuse.mp3" length="67644230" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/dda8f04d-43c6-43d6-9da8-a2ad55f7437c/dda8f04d-43c6-43d6-9da8-a2ad55f7437c.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/dda8f04d-43c6-43d6-9da8-a2ad55f7437c/dda8f04d-43c6-43d6-9da8-a2ad55f7437c.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/dda8f04d-43c6-43d6-9da8-a2ad55f7437c/dda8f04d-43c6-43d6-9da8-a2ad55f7437c.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The extent of Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse turned out to be far larger than the early public version of the case suggested. At first, the story was often framed around a limited number of victims in Palm Beach and a wealthy sex offender who had somehow...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br />The extent of Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse turned out to be far larger than the early public version of the case suggested. At first, the story was often framed around a limited number of victims in Palm Beach and a wealthy sex offender who had somehow received an absurdly lenient plea deal. But as survivors came forward, lawsuits were filed, flight logs were examined, police records resurfaced, and federal prosecutors reopened the case, the scope expanded dramatically. Epstein was no longer just a rich creep abusing a few vulnerable girls in Florida; he was revealed as the center of a long-running, multi-state and international exploitation network involving Palm Beach, New York, New Mexico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Paris, private planes, luxury homes, recruiters, assistants, employees, and powerful people who either enabled him, ignored him, or benefited from being close to him.<br /><br />What made the scale so disturbing was not only the number of alleged victims, but the machinery around the abuse. Epstein allegedly relied on recruiters, schedulers, drivers, pilots, house staff, lawyers, bankers, financial advisers, modeling-world contacts, and social gatekeepers who helped keep his life moving while the abuse continued. Survivors described a system where girls and young women were moved through massages, travel, gifts, pressure, intimidation, and silence, while Epstein used money and status to make himself feel untouchable. The more records came out, the harder it became to believe the original narrow version of the case. This was not a contained scandal. It was a sprawling abuse operation that lasted for years because too many institutions failed, looked away, or decided that Jeffrey Epstein’s money mattered more than the girls he was hurting.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4228</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Inside The OIG Interview:  The Testimony Of An Unnamed MCC Lieutenant (Part 3)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/inside-the-oig-interview-the-testimony-of-an-unnamed-mcc-lieutenant-part-3--72764215</link><description><![CDATA[The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command responsibilities, and awareness of Epstein’s status—the lieutenant repeatedly falls back on vague answers, limited recollection, or an inability to provide specifics. This pattern isn’t occasional—it’s consistent, especially on the exact points where clarity matters most. Rather than offering firm timelines or accountability, the testimony often drifts into generalities, creating the impression that either key information was not retained or not being fully disclosed.<br /><br />That evasiveness becomes even more glaring when discussing the hours leading up to and immediately following Epstein’s death. Questions about whether protocols were followed, who was responsible for monitoring, and how breakdowns occurred are met with uncertainty or deflection, leaving major gaps in the narrative. Instead of clarifying what went wrong, the testimony reinforces the sense of confusion and lack of oversight already seen in other MCC accounts. The result is a record that feels less like a clear explanation and more like a fragmented, incomplete account—one that raises as many questions about credibility and accountability as it answers about the failures inside the facility.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00062649.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00062649.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72764215</guid><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 04:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72764215/mccoiglieutenant3.mp3" length="12075302" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0cb752f6-3fe7-4b79-a97c-7b02a9ae8b59/0cb752f6-3fe7-4b79-a97c-7b02a9ae8b59.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0cb752f6-3fe7-4b79-a97c-7b02a9ae8b59/0cb752f6-3fe7-4b79-a97c-7b02a9ae8b59.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0cb752f6-3fe7-4b79-a97c-7b02a9ae8b59/0cb752f6-3fe7-4b79-a97c-7b02a9ae8b59.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command responsibilities, and awareness of Epstein’s status—the lieutenant repeatedly falls back on vague answers, limited recollection, or an inability to provide specifics. This pattern isn’t occasional—it’s consistent, especially on the exact points where clarity matters most. Rather than offering firm timelines or accountability, the testimony often drifts into generalities, creating the impression that either key information was not retained or not being fully disclosed.<br /><br />That evasiveness becomes even more glaring when discussing the hours leading up to and immediately following Epstein’s death. Questions about whether protocols were followed, who was responsible for monitoring, and how breakdowns occurred are met with uncertainty or deflection, leaving major gaps in the narrative. Instead of clarifying what went wrong, the testimony reinforces the sense of confusion and lack of oversight already seen in other MCC accounts. The result is a record that feels less like a clear explanation and more like a fragmented, incomplete account—one that raises as many questions about credibility and accountability as it answers about the failures inside the facility.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00062649.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00062649.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>755</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Inside The OIG Interview:  The Testimony Of An Unnamed MCC Lieutenant (Part 2)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/inside-the-oig-interview-the-testimony-of-an-unnamed-mcc-lieutenant-part-2--72764244</link><description><![CDATA[The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command responsibilities, and awareness of Epstein’s status—the lieutenant repeatedly falls back on vague answers, limited recollection, or an inability to provide specifics. This pattern isn’t occasional—it’s consistent, especially on the exact points where clarity matters most. Rather than offering firm timelines or accountability, the testimony often drifts into generalities, creating the impression that either key information was not retained or not being fully disclosed.<br /><br />That evasiveness becomes even more glaring when discussing the hours leading up to and immediately following Epstein’s death. Questions about whether protocols were followed, who was responsible for monitoring, and how breakdowns occurred are met with uncertainty or deflection, leaving major gaps in the narrative. Instead of clarifying what went wrong, the testimony reinforces the sense of confusion and lack of oversight already seen in other MCC accounts. The result is a record that feels less like a clear explanation and more like a fragmented, incomplete account—one that raises as many questions about credibility and accountability as it answers about the failures inside the facility.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00062649.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00062649.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72764244</guid><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 02:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72764244/mccoiglieutenant2.mp3" length="13938146" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/81a853d8-0eb1-44c6-b947-f57b84a100df/81a853d8-0eb1-44c6-b947-f57b84a100df.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/81a853d8-0eb1-44c6-b947-f57b84a100df/81a853d8-0eb1-44c6-b947-f57b84a100df.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/81a853d8-0eb1-44c6-b947-f57b84a100df/81a853d8-0eb1-44c6-b947-f57b84a100df.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command responsibilities, and awareness of Epstein’s status—the lieutenant repeatedly falls back on vague answers, limited recollection, or an inability to provide specifics. This pattern isn’t occasional—it’s consistent, especially on the exact points where clarity matters most. Rather than offering firm timelines or accountability, the testimony often drifts into generalities, creating the impression that either key information was not retained or not being fully disclosed.<br /><br />That evasiveness becomes even more glaring when discussing the hours leading up to and immediately following Epstein’s death. Questions about whether protocols were followed, who was responsible for monitoring, and how breakdowns occurred are met with uncertainty or deflection, leaving major gaps in the narrative. Instead of clarifying what went wrong, the testimony reinforces the sense of confusion and lack of oversight already seen in other MCC accounts. The result is a record that feels less like a clear explanation and more like a fragmented, incomplete account—one that raises as many questions about credibility and accountability as it answers about the failures inside the facility.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00062649.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00062649.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>872</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Inside The OIG Interview:  The Testimony Of An Unnamed MCC Lieutenant (Part 1)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/inside-the-oig-interview-the-testimony-of-an-unnamed-mcc-lieutenant-part-1--72764216</link><description><![CDATA[The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command responsibilities, and awareness of Epstein’s status—the lieutenant repeatedly falls back on vague answers, limited recollection, or an inability to provide specifics. This pattern isn’t occasional—it’s consistent, especially on the exact points where clarity matters most. Rather than offering firm timelines or accountability, the testimony often drifts into generalities, creating the impression that either key information was not retained or not being fully disclosed.<br /><br />That evasiveness becomes even more glaring when discussing the hours leading up to and immediately following Epstein’s death. Questions about whether protocols were followed, who was responsible for monitoring, and how breakdowns occurred are met with uncertainty or deflection, leaving major gaps in the narrative. Instead of clarifying what went wrong, the testimony reinforces the sense of confusion and lack of oversight already seen in other MCC accounts. The result is a record that feels less like a clear explanation and more like a fragmented, incomplete account—one that raises as many questions about credibility and accountability as it answers about the failures inside the facility.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00062649.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00062649.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72764216</guid><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 00:37:55 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72764216/mccoiglieutenant1.mp3" length="13467524" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/35436726-b9b0-4ad5-819d-85c7e9557fb8/35436726-b9b0-4ad5-819d-85c7e9557fb8.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/35436726-b9b0-4ad5-819d-85c7e9557fb8/35436726-b9b0-4ad5-819d-85c7e9557fb8.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/35436726-b9b0-4ad5-819d-85c7e9557fb8/35436726-b9b0-4ad5-819d-85c7e9557fb8.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command responsibilities, and awareness of Epstein’s status—the lieutenant repeatedly falls back on vague answers, limited recollection, or an inability to provide specifics. This pattern isn’t occasional—it’s consistent, especially on the exact points where clarity matters most. Rather than offering firm timelines or accountability, the testimony often drifts into generalities, creating the impression that either key information was not retained or not being fully disclosed.<br /><br />That evasiveness becomes even more glaring when discussing the hours leading up to and immediately following Epstein’s death. Questions about whether protocols were followed, who was responsible for monitoring, and how breakdowns occurred are met with uncertainty or deflection, leaving major gaps in the narrative. Instead of clarifying what went wrong, the testimony reinforces the sense of confusion and lack of oversight already seen in other MCC accounts. The result is a record that feels less like a clear explanation and more like a fragmented, incomplete account—one that raises as many questions about credibility and accountability as it answers about the failures inside the facility.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00062649.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00062649.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>842</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Bill Gates Epstein Related Congressional Transcripts (Part 8) (6/30/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-bill-gates-epstein-related-congressional-transcripts-part-8-6-30-26--72757806</link><description><![CDATA[<br />The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates testified that he met Epstein roughly 12 to 14 times between 2011 and 2014, saying he believed Epstein could help attract major philanthropic donations to global health initiatives through the Gates Foundation. He repeatedly described those meetings as "a mistake," insisted he never visited Epstein's private island, New Mexico ranch, or Florida residence, and said he never witnessed criminal conduct or participated in any of Epstein's illegal activities. Gates told lawmakers he ultimately concluded that Epstein had exaggerated both his financial connections and his ability to raise money for philanthropy.<br /><br /><br />One of the most closely watched portions of the transcript concerned allegations that Epstein sought to pressure Gates using knowledge of Gates' personal life. Gates acknowledged several extramarital affairs and testified that Epstein appeared to have learned about them, later making what Gates described as "veiled" attempts at blackmail by referencing those relationships and seeking money connected to one of the women. Gates said he believed Epstein "contemplated" blackmail but maintained he was never actually blackmailed, never paid Epstein to keep information secret, and never committed crimes with him. Throughout the interview, Gates emphasized that his association with Epstein damaged his judgment and reputation, expressed support for releasing the Epstein files and for continued investigations, and said survivors deserve justice while denying any involvement in Epstein's trafficking operation or abuse of minors.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72757806</guid><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72757806/gatestranscript8.mp3" length="12095782" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0ac9bccf-9071-454e-bbcc-0cacf7360abd/0ac9bccf-9071-454e-bbcc-0cacf7360abd.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0ac9bccf-9071-454e-bbcc-0cacf7360abd/0ac9bccf-9071-454e-bbcc-0cacf7360abd.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0ac9bccf-9071-454e-bbcc-0cacf7360abd/0ac9bccf-9071-454e-bbcc-0cacf7360abd.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br />The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates testified that he met Epstein roughly 12 to 14 times between 2011 and 2014, saying he believed Epstein could help attract major philanthropic donations to global health initiatives through the Gates Foundation. He repeatedly described those meetings as "a mistake," insisted he never visited Epstein's private island, New Mexico ranch, or Florida residence, and said he never witnessed criminal conduct or participated in any of Epstein's illegal activities. Gates told lawmakers he ultimately concluded that Epstein had exaggerated both his financial connections and his ability to raise money for philanthropy.<br /><br /><br />One of the most closely watched portions of the transcript concerned allegations that Epstein sought to pressure Gates using knowledge of Gates' personal life. Gates acknowledged several extramarital affairs and testified that Epstein appeared to have learned about them, later making what Gates described as "veiled" attempts at blackmail by referencing those relationships and seeking money connected to one of the women. Gates said he believed Epstein "contemplated" blackmail but maintained he was never actually blackmailed, never paid Epstein to keep information secret, and never committed crimes with him. Throughout the interview, Gates emphasized that his association with Epstein damaged his judgment and reputation, expressed support for releasing the Epstein files and for continued investigations, and said survivors deserve justice while denying any involvement in Epstein's trafficking operation or abuse of minors.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>756</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Karyna Shuliak’s Dental License Adds to Epstein’s New Mexico Trail (6/30/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/karyna-shuliak-s-dental-license-adds-to-epstein-s-new-mexico-trail-6-30-26--72757801</link><description><![CDATA[Karyna Shuliak, Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime girlfriend and one of the last people known to have spoken with him before his death, was licensed as a dentist in New Mexico, adding another strange thread to Epstein’s Zorro Ranch story. Shuliak was born in Belarus, studied dentistry, and later became connected to Epstein after being introduced through Eastern European contacts. Epstein helped fund her education, including her path through Columbia University’s dental school, and later estate documents showed he intended to leave her a massive share of his fortune, including money, jewelry, and major properties. Her New Mexico dental license stands out because Epstein’s ranch near Stanley, New Mexico, has become a renewed focus of investigators, lawmakers, and survivors looking into what happened there and who was connected to the property.<br /><br />Shuliak has not been charged with crimes tied to Epstein, but her role has drawn attention because she was not just a passing girlfriend. Records and reporting have placed her inside Epstein’s personal, financial, and professional world: she was listed in estate documents as a major beneficiary, associated with Epstein-linked addresses, connected to his Virgin Islands life, and reportedly worked in dentistry while also being tied to Southern Trust, one of Epstein’s key business entities. The New Mexico angle makes the story more significant because Zorro Ranch was one of Epstein’s most important properties and has long been surrounded by unanswered questions about abuse allegations, movement of women, and the state’s failure to fully investigate him while he was alive. Shuliak’s license does not prove wrongdoing, but it places Epstein’s final partner inside yet another jurisdiction now trying to untangle his network.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.santafenewmexican.com/news/epstein/zorro-smiles-epsteins-girlfriend-was-licensed-dentist-in-new-mexico/article_2bd5b2d4-2378-44d9-9c5e-6558e5f87737.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">'Zorro Smiles': Epstein's girlfriend was licensed dentist in New Mexico | News | santafenewmexican.com</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72757801</guid><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 18:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72757801/shuliakdentallicensenewmexico.mp3" length="14521617" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/da0bceca-4551-4269-be8c-983326779aba/da0bceca-4551-4269-be8c-983326779aba.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/da0bceca-4551-4269-be8c-983326779aba/da0bceca-4551-4269-be8c-983326779aba.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/da0bceca-4551-4269-be8c-983326779aba/da0bceca-4551-4269-be8c-983326779aba.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Karyna Shuliak, Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime girlfriend and one of the last people known to have spoken with him before his death, was licensed as a dentist in New Mexico, adding another strange thread to Epstein’s Zorro Ranch story. Shuliak was born in...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Karyna Shuliak, Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime girlfriend and one of the last people known to have spoken with him before his death, was licensed as a dentist in New Mexico, adding another strange thread to Epstein’s Zorro Ranch story. Shuliak was born in Belarus, studied dentistry, and later became connected to Epstein after being introduced through Eastern European contacts. Epstein helped fund her education, including her path through Columbia University’s dental school, and later estate documents showed he intended to leave her a massive share of his fortune, including money, jewelry, and major properties. Her New Mexico dental license stands out because Epstein’s ranch near Stanley, New Mexico, has become a renewed focus of investigators, lawmakers, and survivors looking into what happened there and who was connected to the property.<br /><br />Shuliak has not been charged with crimes tied to Epstein, but her role has drawn attention because she was not just a passing girlfriend. Records and reporting have placed her inside Epstein’s personal, financial, and professional world: she was listed in estate documents as a major beneficiary, associated with Epstein-linked addresses, connected to his Virgin Islands life, and reportedly worked in dentistry while also being tied to Southern Trust, one of Epstein’s key business entities. The New Mexico angle makes the story more significant because Zorro Ranch was one of Epstein’s most important properties and has long been surrounded by unanswered questions about abuse allegations, movement of women, and the state’s failure to fully investigate him while he was alive. Shuliak’s license does not prove wrongdoing, but it places Epstein’s final partner inside yet another jurisdiction now trying to untangle his network.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.santafenewmexican.com/news/epstein/zorro-smiles-epsteins-girlfriend-was-licensed-dentist-in-new-mexico/article_2bd5b2d4-2378-44d9-9c5e-6558e5f87737.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">'Zorro Smiles': Epstein's girlfriend was licensed dentist in New Mexico | News | santafenewmexican.com</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>908</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Inside Epstein’s Controversial Work Release and Fergie’s Reported Visit (6/30/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/inside-epstein-s-controversial-work-release-and-fergie-s-reported-visit-6-30-26--72757800</link><description><![CDATA[Sarah Ferguson, the Duchess of York, reportedly visited Jeffrey Epstein twice in 2009 while he was serving his Florida jail sentence for soliciting a minor for prostitution. The visits allegedly took place at the Palm Beach office Epstein used during his controversial work-release arrangement, which allowed him to leave jail for hours each day. Emails released by the Justice Department and reported by The Telegraph described Ferguson contacting Epstein during a Florida layover and arranging to meet him, including references to his driver picking her up and her bringing charity-related documents. The office was tied to the Florida Science Foundation, a company Epstein used as the basis for his work-release setup.<br /><br />The emails also showed Ferguson writing warmly to Epstein, calling him a “dear spectacular and special friend,” thanking him for looking after her, and continuing to discuss contact and assistance from him despite his conviction. The revelations added to earlier scrutiny over Epstein helping Ferguson financially, including the previously reported £15,000 payment she later called a “gigantic error of judgment.” The damaging part is the timing: Epstein was not merely a disgraced financier at that point, he was actively serving a sentence connected to a minor, yet Ferguson still allegedly met with him through a work-release loophole that has since become one of the most notorious examples of how Epstein received special treatment.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-15933067/Sarah-Ferguson-visited-Epstein-twice-office.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Sarah Ferguson visited Epstein TWICE at office for a bogus firm he set up while he was serving prison sentence for child sex offence | Daily Mail Online</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72757800</guid><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72757800/fergievisitedepsteinworkrelease.mp3" length="11586708" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ef3e4a25-e0f8-466b-8d99-81f3a65cc329/ef3e4a25-e0f8-466b-8d99-81f3a65cc329.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ef3e4a25-e0f8-466b-8d99-81f3a65cc329/ef3e4a25-e0f8-466b-8d99-81f3a65cc329.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ef3e4a25-e0f8-466b-8d99-81f3a65cc329/ef3e4a25-e0f8-466b-8d99-81f3a65cc329.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Sarah Ferguson, the Duchess of York, reportedly visited Jeffrey Epstein twice in 2009 while he was serving his Florida jail sentence for soliciting a minor for prostitution. The visits allegedly took place at the Palm Beach office Epstein used during...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Sarah Ferguson, the Duchess of York, reportedly visited Jeffrey Epstein twice in 2009 while he was serving his Florida jail sentence for soliciting a minor for prostitution. The visits allegedly took place at the Palm Beach office Epstein used during his controversial work-release arrangement, which allowed him to leave jail for hours each day. Emails released by the Justice Department and reported by The Telegraph described Ferguson contacting Epstein during a Florida layover and arranging to meet him, including references to his driver picking her up and her bringing charity-related documents. The office was tied to the Florida Science Foundation, a company Epstein used as the basis for his work-release setup.<br /><br />The emails also showed Ferguson writing warmly to Epstein, calling him a “dear spectacular and special friend,” thanking him for looking after her, and continuing to discuss contact and assistance from him despite his conviction. The revelations added to earlier scrutiny over Epstein helping Ferguson financially, including the previously reported £15,000 payment she later called a “gigantic error of judgment.” The damaging part is the timing: Epstein was not merely a disgraced financier at that point, he was actively serving a sentence connected to a minor, yet Ferguson still allegedly met with him through a work-release loophole that has since become one of the most notorious examples of how Epstein received special treatment.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-15933067/Sarah-Ferguson-visited-Epstein-twice-office.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Sarah Ferguson visited Epstein TWICE at office for a bogus firm he set up while he was serving prison sentence for child sex offence | Daily Mail Online</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>725</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Leon Black Storms Out Of His Epstein Related Congressional Interview (6/30/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/leon-black-storms-out-of-his-epstein-related-congressional-interview-6-30-26--72757514</link><description><![CDATA[Leon Black was subpoenaed by the House Oversight Committee in the middle of his closed-door testimony about Jeffrey Epstein after he refused to answer questions about possible non-disclosure agreements involving women connected to Epstein. Chairman James Comer said lawmakers wanted the NDAs to determine whether Epstein was involved in writing them, arranging them, funding them, or using them to silence women in his orbit. One subpoena demands the NDA records, and another requires Black to return for videotaped testimony under oath on July 16. Black’s lawyer, Susan Estrich, blasted the move as a “planned political stunt” and said Epstein had no involvement with any NDAs, whether they exist or not.<br /><br />Black told lawmakers he had no role in Epstein’s sex-trafficking crimes, no knowledge of Epstein’s abuse, and never paid Epstein for access to women. He repeated that he hired Epstein for tax and estate planning work, saying Epstein “solved a massive estate problem” and that he believed the fees were partly tax-deductible, even though the total eventually came to about $158 million. Black said Epstein deceived him, describing the relationship as “I knew Jekyll” and “I didn’t know Hyde,” while also pointing to an Apollo-commissioned Dechert review that found no evidence he participated in Epstein’s crimes. The committee’s focus, however, is now moving beyond the old explanation about tax advice and into whether Black’s private legal arrangements with women intersected with Epstein’s network.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://nypost.com/2026/06/26/business/house-committee-subpoenas-leon-black-during-jeffrey-epstein-testimony-report/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">House committee subpoenas Leon Black during Jeffrey Epstein testimony</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72757514</guid><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72757514/leonblackwalksouttestimony.mp3" length="16519462" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b0d947cf-59aa-46b1-b4be-3c415940601c/b0d947cf-59aa-46b1-b4be-3c415940601c.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b0d947cf-59aa-46b1-b4be-3c415940601c/b0d947cf-59aa-46b1-b4be-3c415940601c.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b0d947cf-59aa-46b1-b4be-3c415940601c/b0d947cf-59aa-46b1-b4be-3c415940601c.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Leon Black was subpoenaed by the House Oversight Committee in the middle of his closed-door testimony about Jeffrey Epstein after he refused to answer questions about possible non-disclosure agreements involving women connected to Epstein. Chairman...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Leon Black was subpoenaed by the House Oversight Committee in the middle of his closed-door testimony about Jeffrey Epstein after he refused to answer questions about possible non-disclosure agreements involving women connected to Epstein. Chairman James Comer said lawmakers wanted the NDAs to determine whether Epstein was involved in writing them, arranging them, funding them, or using them to silence women in his orbit. One subpoena demands the NDA records, and another requires Black to return for videotaped testimony under oath on July 16. Black’s lawyer, Susan Estrich, blasted the move as a “planned political stunt” and said Epstein had no involvement with any NDAs, whether they exist or not.<br /><br />Black told lawmakers he had no role in Epstein’s sex-trafficking crimes, no knowledge of Epstein’s abuse, and never paid Epstein for access to women. He repeated that he hired Epstein for tax and estate planning work, saying Epstein “solved a massive estate problem” and that he believed the fees were partly tax-deductible, even though the total eventually came to about $158 million. Black said Epstein deceived him, describing the relationship as “I knew Jekyll” and “I didn’t know Hyde,” while also pointing to an Apollo-commissioned Dechert review that found no evidence he participated in Epstein’s crimes. The committee’s focus, however, is now moving beyond the old explanation about tax advice and into whether Black’s private legal arrangements with women intersected with Epstein’s network.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://nypost.com/2026/06/26/business/house-committee-subpoenas-leon-black-during-jeffrey-epstein-testimony-report/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">House committee subpoenas Leon Black during Jeffrey Epstein testimony</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1033</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Inside Epstein’s Controversial Work Release and Fergie’s Reported Visit (6/30/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/inside-epstein-s-controversial-work-release-and-fergie-s-reported-visit-6-30-26--72756375</link><description><![CDATA[Sarah Ferguson, the Duchess of York, reportedly visited Jeffrey Epstein twice in 2009 while he was serving his Florida jail sentence for soliciting a minor for prostitution. The visits allegedly took place at the Palm Beach office Epstein used during his controversial work-release arrangement, which allowed him to leave jail for hours each day. Emails released by the Justice Department and reported by The Telegraph described Ferguson contacting Epstein during a Florida layover and arranging to meet him, including references to his driver picking her up and her bringing charity-related documents. The office was tied to the Florida Science Foundation, a company Epstein used as the basis for his work-release setup.<br /><br />The emails also showed Ferguson writing warmly to Epstein, calling him a “dear spectacular and special friend,” thanking him for looking after her, and continuing to discuss contact and assistance from him despite his conviction. The revelations added to earlier scrutiny over Epstein helping Ferguson financially, including the previously reported £15,000 payment she later called a “gigantic error of judgment.” The damaging part is the timing: Epstein was not merely a disgraced financier at that point, he was actively serving a sentence connected to a minor, yet Ferguson still allegedly met with him through a work-release loophole that has since become one of the most notorious examples of how Epstein received special treatment.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-15933067/Sarah-Ferguson-visited-Epstein-twice-office.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Sarah Ferguson visited Epstein TWICE at office for a bogus firm he set up while he was serving prison sentence for child sex offence | Daily Mail Online</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72756375</guid><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 12:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72756375/fergievisitedepsteinworkrelease.mp3" length="11586708" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5c7146fc-88c4-4e45-b8ba-0249e10afd3c/5c7146fc-88c4-4e45-b8ba-0249e10afd3c.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5c7146fc-88c4-4e45-b8ba-0249e10afd3c/5c7146fc-88c4-4e45-b8ba-0249e10afd3c.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5c7146fc-88c4-4e45-b8ba-0249e10afd3c/5c7146fc-88c4-4e45-b8ba-0249e10afd3c.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Sarah Ferguson, the Duchess of York, reportedly visited Jeffrey Epstein twice in 2009 while he was serving his Florida jail sentence for soliciting a minor for prostitution. The visits allegedly took place at the Palm Beach office Epstein used during...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Sarah Ferguson, the Duchess of York, reportedly visited Jeffrey Epstein twice in 2009 while he was serving his Florida jail sentence for soliciting a minor for prostitution. The visits allegedly took place at the Palm Beach office Epstein used during his controversial work-release arrangement, which allowed him to leave jail for hours each day. Emails released by the Justice Department and reported by The Telegraph described Ferguson contacting Epstein during a Florida layover and arranging to meet him, including references to his driver picking her up and her bringing charity-related documents. The office was tied to the Florida Science Foundation, a company Epstein used as the basis for his work-release setup.<br /><br />The emails also showed Ferguson writing warmly to Epstein, calling him a “dear spectacular and special friend,” thanking him for looking after her, and continuing to discuss contact and assistance from him despite his conviction. The revelations added to earlier scrutiny over Epstein helping Ferguson financially, including the previously reported £15,000 payment she later called a “gigantic error of judgment.” The damaging part is the timing: Epstein was not merely a disgraced financier at that point, he was actively serving a sentence connected to a minor, yet Ferguson still allegedly met with him through a work-release loophole that has since become one of the most notorious examples of how Epstein received special treatment.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-15933067/Sarah-Ferguson-visited-Epstein-twice-office.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Sarah Ferguson visited Epstein TWICE at office for a bogus firm he set up while he was serving prison sentence for child sex offence | Daily Mail Online</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>725</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Jeffrey Epstein And His Open Wallet Policy At Harvard (6/30/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-his-open-wallet-policy-at-harvard-6-30-26--72741707</link><description><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein’s ties to Harvard were not casual or incidental; they were deep, expensive, and reputationally useful to him. Harvard’s own 2020 review found that the university received $9.1 million from Epstein between 1998 and 2008, including a $6.5 million gift in 2003 that helped create the Program for Evolutionary Dynamics, led by professor Martin Nowak. Harvard said it stopped accepting direct gifts from Epstein after his 2008 conviction, but the damage was already done: Epstein had used Harvard’s prestige, faculty relationships, campus access, and scientific circles to launder his image as a serious intellectual patron instead of the predator he was.<br /><br />The scandal has not gone away because later reporting and congressional scrutiny raised questions about whether Harvard’s earlier internal reviews were incomplete, especially regarding Epstein’s post-conviction relationships with faculty, indirect funding, and connections to figures such as Larry Summers and George Church. In 2026, Rep. Jamie Raskin expanded an investigation into Harvard and Bard, seeking records on Epstein’s funding of research and his personal relationships with faculty, while Harvard also faced renewed scrutiny after newly released Epstein files showed the breadth of his academic network. The broader picture is that Epstein did not just donate money to Harvard; he embedded himself in elite academic life, using proximity to famous scholars and institutions to rehabilitate his public standing and maintain access to powerful circles long after his criminal conduct was known<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72741707</guid><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72741707/megaepsteinpatronsaintharvard.mp3" length="58771822" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6cc6e77f-c21a-400c-b967-dc3126a952d5/6cc6e77f-c21a-400c-b967-dc3126a952d5.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6cc6e77f-c21a-400c-b967-dc3126a952d5/6cc6e77f-c21a-400c-b967-dc3126a952d5.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6cc6e77f-c21a-400c-b967-dc3126a952d5/6cc6e77f-c21a-400c-b967-dc3126a952d5.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jeffrey Epstein’s ties to Harvard were not casual or incidental; they were deep, expensive, and reputationally useful to him. Harvard’s own 2020 review found that the university received $9.1 million from Epstein between 1998 and 2008, including a...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein’s ties to Harvard were not casual or incidental; they were deep, expensive, and reputationally useful to him. Harvard’s own 2020 review found that the university received $9.1 million from Epstein between 1998 and 2008, including a $6.5 million gift in 2003 that helped create the Program for Evolutionary Dynamics, led by professor Martin Nowak. Harvard said it stopped accepting direct gifts from Epstein after his 2008 conviction, but the damage was already done: Epstein had used Harvard’s prestige, faculty relationships, campus access, and scientific circles to launder his image as a serious intellectual patron instead of the predator he was.<br /><br />The scandal has not gone away because later reporting and congressional scrutiny raised questions about whether Harvard’s earlier internal reviews were incomplete, especially regarding Epstein’s post-conviction relationships with faculty, indirect funding, and connections to figures such as Larry Summers and George Church. In 2026, Rep. Jamie Raskin expanded an investigation into Harvard and Bard, seeking records on Epstein’s funding of research and his personal relationships with faculty, while Harvard also faced renewed scrutiny after newly released Epstein files showed the breadth of his academic network. The broader picture is that Epstein did not just donate money to Harvard; he embedded himself in elite academic life, using proximity to famous scholars and institutions to rehabilitate his public standing and maintain access to powerful circles long after his criminal conduct was known<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3674</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   Judge Nathan And Her Management Of The Ghislaine Maxwell Trial Circus (6/30/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-judge-nathan-and-her-management-of-the-ghislaine-maxwell-trial-circus-6-30-26--72741706</link><description><![CDATA[Judge Alison Nathan was the federal judge who presided over Ghislaine Maxwell’s criminal case in the Southern District of New York. Before joining the federal bench, Nathan worked in private practice, served in the Obama administration, and was nominated to the district court in 2011; she was later elevated to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, but continued handling Maxwell’s case by designation. In Maxwell’s case, Nathan oversaw the arraignment, detention fight, discovery schedule, pretrial motions, jury selection, trial, verdict, and sentencing. DOJ records show that Maxwell was ordered detained before trial and that Nathan set the early schedule for discovery, motions, and trial proceedings.<br /><br />Nathan managed the Maxwell trial in a controlled, no-nonsense way, keeping the proceedings moving while handling an avalanche of high-profile issues: secrecy disputes, witness privacy, evidence about Epstein, media attention, juror questions, and repeated defense efforts to narrow or challenge the case. The trial lasted about four and a half weeks, and Maxwell was convicted in December 2021 of helping Epstein recruit and groom underage girls for sexual abuse. Nathan later sentenced Maxwell to 20 years in prison and a $750,000 fine, telling the court that the sentence reflected Maxwell’s role in enabling Epstein’s abuse while also rejecting the idea that Maxwell was being punished for Epstein’s crimes alone.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72741706</guid><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72741706/megajudgenathan.mp3" length="54480635" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/941f8974-9c13-42a9-bf8b-2ae324c60dc2/941f8974-9c13-42a9-bf8b-2ae324c60dc2.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/941f8974-9c13-42a9-bf8b-2ae324c60dc2/941f8974-9c13-42a9-bf8b-2ae324c60dc2.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/941f8974-9c13-42a9-bf8b-2ae324c60dc2/941f8974-9c13-42a9-bf8b-2ae324c60dc2.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Judge Alison Nathan was the federal judge who presided over Ghislaine Maxwell’s criminal case in the Southern District of New York. Before joining the federal bench, Nathan worked in private practice, served in the Obama administration, and was...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Judge Alison Nathan was the federal judge who presided over Ghislaine Maxwell’s criminal case in the Southern District of New York. Before joining the federal bench, Nathan worked in private practice, served in the Obama administration, and was nominated to the district court in 2011; she was later elevated to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, but continued handling Maxwell’s case by designation. In Maxwell’s case, Nathan oversaw the arraignment, detention fight, discovery schedule, pretrial motions, jury selection, trial, verdict, and sentencing. DOJ records show that Maxwell was ordered detained before trial and that Nathan set the early schedule for discovery, motions, and trial proceedings.<br /><br />Nathan managed the Maxwell trial in a controlled, no-nonsense way, keeping the proceedings moving while handling an avalanche of high-profile issues: secrecy disputes, witness privacy, evidence about Epstein, media attention, juror questions, and repeated defense efforts to narrow or challenge the case. The trial lasted about four and a half weeks, and Maxwell was convicted in December 2021 of helping Epstein recruit and groom underage girls for sexual abuse. Nathan later sentenced Maxwell to 20 years in prison and a $750,000 fine, telling the court that the sentence reflected Maxwell’s role in enabling Epstein’s abuse while also rejecting the idea that Maxwell was being punished for Epstein’s crimes alone.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3406</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Streaming Services And Their Presentation Of The Epstein Story (6/29/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-streaming-services-and-their-presentation-of-the-epstein-story-6-29-26--72741705</link><description><![CDATA[There have been multiple documentaries that pulled Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Prince Andrew back into the public spotlight by laying out how Epstein’s abuse network operated, how Maxwell allegedly helped recruit and manage young women, and how Andrew became one of the most infamous powerful men tied to the scandal through Virginia Giuffre’s allegations. These productions helped keep the story alive by showing the pattern around Epstein’s world: money, access, private planes, elite homes, famous friends, and a social circle where people later claimed they either saw nothing, knew nothing, or misunderstood what was happening. Andrew’s downfall became its own major thread because his BBC interview, his friendship with Maxwell, and his settlement with Giuffre turned him into a symbol of how Epstein’s scandal reached directly into the royal family.<br /><br />Victoria’s Secret: Angels and Demons widened that same lens by focusing on Les Wexner, Victoria’s Secret, and the fashion-business world that helped give Epstein status and legitimacy. The series traces Wexner’s rise, the creation of the Victoria’s Secret empire, and the strange, powerful relationship between Wexner and Epstein, who became deeply embedded in Wexner’s financial and personal orbit despite lacking any obvious background that explained that level of trust. It connected the glamour of the Victoria’s Secret brand to a darker world of billionaire access, image-making, models, money, and Epstein’s ability to attach himself to institutions and powerful people who gave him credibility.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72741705</guid><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72741705/megaepsteinmaxellstarzhuludocumentaries.mp3" length="55694359" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3d9e6758-4b0d-4873-ab84-7b3721c5adbf/3d9e6758-4b0d-4873-ab84-7b3721c5adbf.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3d9e6758-4b0d-4873-ab84-7b3721c5adbf/3d9e6758-4b0d-4873-ab84-7b3721c5adbf.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3d9e6758-4b0d-4873-ab84-7b3721c5adbf/3d9e6758-4b0d-4873-ab84-7b3721c5adbf.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>There have been multiple documentaries that pulled Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Prince Andrew back into the public spotlight by laying out how Epstein’s abuse network operated, how Maxwell allegedly helped recruit and manage young women,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[There have been multiple documentaries that pulled Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Prince Andrew back into the public spotlight by laying out how Epstein’s abuse network operated, how Maxwell allegedly helped recruit and manage young women, and how Andrew became one of the most infamous powerful men tied to the scandal through Virginia Giuffre’s allegations. These productions helped keep the story alive by showing the pattern around Epstein’s world: money, access, private planes, elite homes, famous friends, and a social circle where people later claimed they either saw nothing, knew nothing, or misunderstood what was happening. Andrew’s downfall became its own major thread because his BBC interview, his friendship with Maxwell, and his settlement with Giuffre turned him into a symbol of how Epstein’s scandal reached directly into the royal family.<br /><br />Victoria’s Secret: Angels and Demons widened that same lens by focusing on Les Wexner, Victoria’s Secret, and the fashion-business world that helped give Epstein status and legitimacy. The series traces Wexner’s rise, the creation of the Victoria’s Secret empire, and the strange, powerful relationship between Wexner and Epstein, who became deeply embedded in Wexner’s financial and personal orbit despite lacking any obvious background that explained that level of trust. It connected the glamour of the Victoria’s Secret brand to a darker world of billionaire access, image-making, models, money, and Epstein’s ability to attach himself to institutions and powerful people who gave him credibility.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3481</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Lord Conrad Black And His Defense Of Prince Andrew</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/lord-conrad-black-and-his-defense-of-prince-andrew--72741629</link><description><![CDATA[Lord Conrad Black, a controversial media magnate and convicted felon pardoned by former President Trump, entered the Prince Andrew controversy with a highly defensive stance that framed the royal as a victim of disproportionate post-Epstein scrutiny rather than someone whose conduct merited accountability. In opinion pieces, Black insisted it was “a disgrace” that Prince Andrew was isolated and stripped of honors over a civil lawsuit tied to allegations about his association with Jeffrey Epstein, arguing that the withdrawal of titles by Queen Elizabeth II was unjustified given there had been no criminal conviction or definitive finding of wrongdoing against the Duke of York. Black leaned heavily on the presumption of innocence and cast the legal and media pressure on Andrew as a kind of “frenzied assault” fueled by a sensationalist system that targets powerful men, rather than focusing on survivor testimony or the deep entanglement between Epstein’s network and elite figures.<br /><br /><br />Critics of Black’s defense have argued that his position misses the core issue — not whether Andrew was criminally convicted, but whether his behavior and associations with Epstein were reckless, harmful, and deserving of vigorous scrutiny. By minimizing the severity of allegations and focusing on perceived procedural unfairness, Black’s commentary was seen by many as protective of privilege rather than supportive of truth or justice, particularly given the emerging documentary evidence showing Andrew’s ongoing contact with Epstein even after public backlash. His framing also glossed over the substantive harm experienced by survivors and the pattern of evasive responses from Andrew himself, reducing a complex reckoning over power, influence, and alleged sexual exploitation to a narrative about misplaced outrage — a stance that critics say aligns with a long tradition of elites defending elites at the expense of victims’ voices and accountability. Strictly public sources do not confirm every claim made here; Black’s commentary focused on defending reputation and criticizing the backlash, but the broader context includes documented serious allegations and responses from royal and legal authorities.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72741629</guid><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72741629/lordconradblackandrew.mp3" length="19616540" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d642e798-bdf0-4332-8761-2be9b5900111/d642e798-bdf0-4332-8761-2be9b5900111.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d642e798-bdf0-4332-8761-2be9b5900111/d642e798-bdf0-4332-8761-2be9b5900111.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d642e798-bdf0-4332-8761-2be9b5900111/d642e798-bdf0-4332-8761-2be9b5900111.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Lord Conrad Black, a controversial media magnate and convicted felon pardoned by former President Trump, entered the Prince Andrew controversy with a highly defensive stance that framed the royal as a victim of disproportionate post-Epstein scrutiny...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Lord Conrad Black, a controversial media magnate and convicted felon pardoned by former President Trump, entered the Prince Andrew controversy with a highly defensive stance that framed the royal as a victim of disproportionate post-Epstein scrutiny rather than someone whose conduct merited accountability. In opinion pieces, Black insisted it was “a disgrace” that Prince Andrew was isolated and stripped of honors over a civil lawsuit tied to allegations about his association with Jeffrey Epstein, arguing that the withdrawal of titles by Queen Elizabeth II was unjustified given there had been no criminal conviction or definitive finding of wrongdoing against the Duke of York. Black leaned heavily on the presumption of innocence and cast the legal and media pressure on Andrew as a kind of “frenzied assault” fueled by a sensationalist system that targets powerful men, rather than focusing on survivor testimony or the deep entanglement between Epstein’s network and elite figures.<br /><br /><br />Critics of Black’s defense have argued that his position misses the core issue — not whether Andrew was criminally convicted, but whether his behavior and associations with Epstein were reckless, harmful, and deserving of vigorous scrutiny. By minimizing the severity of allegations and focusing on perceived procedural unfairness, Black’s commentary was seen by many as protective of privilege rather than supportive of truth or justice, particularly given the emerging documentary evidence showing Andrew’s ongoing contact with Epstein even after public backlash. His framing also glossed over the substantive harm experienced by survivors and the pattern of evasive responses from Andrew himself, reducing a complex reckoning over power, influence, and alleged sexual exploitation to a narrative about misplaced outrage — a stance that critics say aligns with a long tradition of elites defending elites at the expense of victims’ voices and accountability. Strictly public sources do not confirm every claim made here; Black’s commentary focused on defending reputation and criticizing the backlash, but the broader context includes documented serious allegations and responses from royal and legal authorities.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1227</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Bill Gates Denies He Has Ever Been To Little Saint James</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/bill-gates-denies-he-has-ever-been-to-little-saint-james--72741628</link><description><![CDATA[Bill Gates’ representatives denied claims circulating online that he repeatedly visited Jeffrey Epstein’s private island, Little St. James. A spokesperson for Gates said the allegation was false and stated that Gates had never been to the island. The denial came after social media posts alleged Gates had traveled there dozens of times, tying him to one of the most notorious locations associated with Epstein’s sex-trafficking allegations.<br /><br />Gates’ team did acknowledge that Gates had met with Epstein in the past, but said those meetings were connected to philanthropy and global health discussions, not visits to Epstein’s island. The claims about repeated island trips were also challenged by available flight-log reviews, which did not show evidence that Gates traveled to Little St. James dozens of times. Gates’ connection to Epstein remained controversial because the meetings happened after Epstein’s 2008 conviction, but the specific claim denied was that Gates repeatedly visited Epstein’s island.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://nypost.com/2020/05/15/bill-gates-didnt-visit-sex-criminal-jeffrey-epsteins-island-repeatedly/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bill Gates didn't visit sex criminal Jeffrey Epstein's island repeatedly</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72741628</guid><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72741628/gatesisland.mp3" length="22857813" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2b014b9e-9480-4054-a0b6-cdff76ef4584/2b014b9e-9480-4054-a0b6-cdff76ef4584.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2b014b9e-9480-4054-a0b6-cdff76ef4584/2b014b9e-9480-4054-a0b6-cdff76ef4584.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2b014b9e-9480-4054-a0b6-cdff76ef4584/2b014b9e-9480-4054-a0b6-cdff76ef4584.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Bill Gates’ representatives denied claims circulating online that he repeatedly visited Jeffrey Epstein’s private island, Little St. James. A spokesperson for Gates said the allegation was false and stated that Gates had never been to the island. The...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Bill Gates’ representatives denied claims circulating online that he repeatedly visited Jeffrey Epstein’s private island, Little St. James. A spokesperson for Gates said the allegation was false and stated that Gates had never been to the island. The denial came after social media posts alleged Gates had traveled there dozens of times, tying him to one of the most notorious locations associated with Epstein’s sex-trafficking allegations.<br /><br />Gates’ team did acknowledge that Gates had met with Epstein in the past, but said those meetings were connected to philanthropy and global health discussions, not visits to Epstein’s island. The claims about repeated island trips were also challenged by available flight-log reviews, which did not show evidence that Gates traveled to Little St. James dozens of times. Gates’ connection to Epstein remained controversial because the meetings happened after Epstein’s 2008 conviction, but the specific claim denied was that Gates repeatedly visited Epstein’s island.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://nypost.com/2020/05/15/bill-gates-didnt-visit-sex-criminal-jeffrey-epsteins-island-repeatedly/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bill Gates didn't visit sex criminal Jeffrey Epstein's island repeatedly</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1429</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The DOJ And Their Long Running Conversation With Epstein's Lawyers (Part 6)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-doj-and-their-long-running-conversation-with-epstein-s-lawyers-part-6--72718546</link><description><![CDATA[The back-and-forth between prosecutors in the Southern District of Florida and Jeffrey Epstein’s legal team during the negotiation of the non-prosecution agreement reads less like an adversarial process and more like a prolonged, collaborative dialogue aimed at reaching terms acceptable to Epstein himself. His attorneys were not simply responding to charges—they were actively shaping the framework of the deal, pushing for concessions on scope, immunity, and exposure not just for Epstein, but for potential co-conspirators. Instead of drawing hard lines, federal prosecutors engaged in a sustained colloquy that entertained defense proposals, adjusted positions, and ultimately bent toward a resolution that prioritized closure over accountability. The result was an agreement that allowed Epstein to plead to minor state charges while securing sweeping federal immunity, effectively shutting down a far broader investigation before it could fully develop.<br /><br />What makes this even more damning is how the Department of Justice appeared willing—if not eager—to accommodate Epstein’s demands at nearly every turn. Rather than treating him as the central figure in a sprawling abuse network, prosecutors treated him like a negotiating partner whose preferences needed to be satisfied. Victims were sidelined, key investigative avenues were abandoned, and the final agreement was structured in a way that insulated not only Epstein but others in his orbit from federal scrutiny. This was not a failure of resources or a lack of evidence—it was a conscious decision to resolve the case on terms dictated by the defense. The DOJ’s handling of this process reflects a systemic breakdown in prosecutorial duty, where the pursuit of justice was subordinated to expediency and deference to power, leaving behind one of the most glaring examples of institutional failure in modern federal criminal practice.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00226107.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00226107.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72718546</guid><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72718546/villafanapleadealemails6.mp3" length="12415521" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3cd1e82b-f651-4f5e-b4e1-cf4fa88ac87b/3cd1e82b-f651-4f5e-b4e1-cf4fa88ac87b.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3cd1e82b-f651-4f5e-b4e1-cf4fa88ac87b/3cd1e82b-f651-4f5e-b4e1-cf4fa88ac87b.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3cd1e82b-f651-4f5e-b4e1-cf4fa88ac87b/3cd1e82b-f651-4f5e-b4e1-cf4fa88ac87b.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The back-and-forth between prosecutors in the Southern District of Florida and Jeffrey Epstein’s legal team during the negotiation of the non-prosecution agreement reads less like an adversarial process and more like a prolonged, collaborative...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The back-and-forth between prosecutors in the Southern District of Florida and Jeffrey Epstein’s legal team during the negotiation of the non-prosecution agreement reads less like an adversarial process and more like a prolonged, collaborative dialogue aimed at reaching terms acceptable to Epstein himself. His attorneys were not simply responding to charges—they were actively shaping the framework of the deal, pushing for concessions on scope, immunity, and exposure not just for Epstein, but for potential co-conspirators. Instead of drawing hard lines, federal prosecutors engaged in a sustained colloquy that entertained defense proposals, adjusted positions, and ultimately bent toward a resolution that prioritized closure over accountability. The result was an agreement that allowed Epstein to plead to minor state charges while securing sweeping federal immunity, effectively shutting down a far broader investigation before it could fully develop.<br /><br />What makes this even more damning is how the Department of Justice appeared willing—if not eager—to accommodate Epstein’s demands at nearly every turn. Rather than treating him as the central figure in a sprawling abuse network, prosecutors treated him like a negotiating partner whose preferences needed to be satisfied. Victims were sidelined, key investigative avenues were abandoned, and the final agreement was structured in a way that insulated not only Epstein but others in his orbit from federal scrutiny. This was not a failure of resources or a lack of evidence—it was a conscious decision to resolve the case on terms dictated by the defense. The DOJ’s handling of this process reflects a systemic breakdown in prosecutorial duty, where the pursuit of justice was subordinated to expediency and deference to power, leaving behind one of the most glaring examples of institutional failure in modern federal criminal practice.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00226107.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00226107.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>776</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The DOJ And Their Long Running Conversation With Epstein's Lawyers (Part 5)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-doj-and-their-long-running-conversation-with-epstein-s-lawyers-part-5--72718547</link><description><![CDATA[The back-and-forth between prosecutors in the Southern District of Florida and Jeffrey Epstein’s legal team during the negotiation of the non-prosecution agreement reads less like an adversarial process and more like a prolonged, collaborative dialogue aimed at reaching terms acceptable to Epstein himself. His attorneys were not simply responding to charges—they were actively shaping the framework of the deal, pushing for concessions on scope, immunity, and exposure not just for Epstein, but for potential co-conspirators. Instead of drawing hard lines, federal prosecutors engaged in a sustained colloquy that entertained defense proposals, adjusted positions, and ultimately bent toward a resolution that prioritized closure over accountability. The result was an agreement that allowed Epstein to plead to minor state charges while securing sweeping federal immunity, effectively shutting down a far broader investigation before it could fully develop.<br /><br />What makes this even more damning is how the Department of Justice appeared willing—if not eager—to accommodate Epstein’s demands at nearly every turn. Rather than treating him as the central figure in a sprawling abuse network, prosecutors treated him like a negotiating partner whose preferences needed to be satisfied. Victims were sidelined, key investigative avenues were abandoned, and the final agreement was structured in a way that insulated not only Epstein but others in his orbit from federal scrutiny. This was not a failure of resources or a lack of evidence—it was a conscious decision to resolve the case on terms dictated by the defense. The DOJ’s handling of this process reflects a systemic breakdown in prosecutorial duty, where the pursuit of justice was subordinated to expediency and deference to power, leaving behind one of the most glaring examples of institutional failure in modern federal criminal practice.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00226107.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00226107.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72718547</guid><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72718547/villafanapleadealemails5.mp3" length="11684928" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/22741d13-1ce2-45ad-b82f-97fd23030650/22741d13-1ce2-45ad-b82f-97fd23030650.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/22741d13-1ce2-45ad-b82f-97fd23030650/22741d13-1ce2-45ad-b82f-97fd23030650.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/22741d13-1ce2-45ad-b82f-97fd23030650/22741d13-1ce2-45ad-b82f-97fd23030650.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The back-and-forth between prosecutors in the Southern District of Florida and Jeffrey Epstein’s legal team during the negotiation of the non-prosecution agreement reads less like an adversarial process and more like a prolonged, collaborative...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The back-and-forth between prosecutors in the Southern District of Florida and Jeffrey Epstein’s legal team during the negotiation of the non-prosecution agreement reads less like an adversarial process and more like a prolonged, collaborative dialogue aimed at reaching terms acceptable to Epstein himself. His attorneys were not simply responding to charges—they were actively shaping the framework of the deal, pushing for concessions on scope, immunity, and exposure not just for Epstein, but for potential co-conspirators. Instead of drawing hard lines, federal prosecutors engaged in a sustained colloquy that entertained defense proposals, adjusted positions, and ultimately bent toward a resolution that prioritized closure over accountability. The result was an agreement that allowed Epstein to plead to minor state charges while securing sweeping federal immunity, effectively shutting down a far broader investigation before it could fully develop.<br /><br />What makes this even more damning is how the Department of Justice appeared willing—if not eager—to accommodate Epstein’s demands at nearly every turn. Rather than treating him as the central figure in a sprawling abuse network, prosecutors treated him like a negotiating partner whose preferences needed to be satisfied. Victims were sidelined, key investigative avenues were abandoned, and the final agreement was structured in a way that insulated not only Epstein but others in his orbit from federal scrutiny. This was not a failure of resources or a lack of evidence—it was a conscious decision to resolve the case on terms dictated by the defense. The DOJ’s handling of this process reflects a systemic breakdown in prosecutorial duty, where the pursuit of justice was subordinated to expediency and deference to power, leaving behind one of the most glaring examples of institutional failure in modern federal criminal practice.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00226107.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00226107.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>731</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Bill Gates Epstein Related Congressional Transcripts (Part 7) (6/29/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-bill-gates-epstein-related-congressional-transcripts-part-7-6-29-26--72739888</link><description><![CDATA[<br />The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates testified that he met Epstein roughly 12 to 14 times between 2011 and 2014, saying he believed Epstein could help attract major philanthropic donations to global health initiatives through the Gates Foundation. He repeatedly described those meetings as "a mistake," insisted he never visited Epstein's private island, New Mexico ranch, or Florida residence, and said he never witnessed criminal conduct or participated in any of Epstein's illegal activities. Gates told lawmakers he ultimately concluded that Epstein had exaggerated both his financial connections and his ability to raise money for philanthropy.<br /><br /><br />One of the most closely watched portions of the transcript concerned allegations that Epstein sought to pressure Gates using knowledge of Gates' personal life. Gates acknowledged several extramarital affairs and testified that Epstein appeared to have learned about them, later making what Gates described as "veiled" attempts at blackmail by referencing those relationships and seeking money connected to one of the women. Gates said he believed Epstein "contemplated" blackmail but maintained he was never actually blackmailed, never paid Epstein to keep information secret, and never committed crimes with him. Throughout the interview, Gates emphasized that his association with Epstein damaged his judgment and reputation, expressed support for releasing the Epstein files and for continued investigations, and said survivors deserve justice while denying any involvement in Epstein's trafficking operation or abuse of minors.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72739888</guid><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72739888/gatestranscript7.mp3" length="15625866" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d2d8085e-61c7-4e34-8e33-69ddcea49996/d2d8085e-61c7-4e34-8e33-69ddcea49996.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d2d8085e-61c7-4e34-8e33-69ddcea49996/d2d8085e-61c7-4e34-8e33-69ddcea49996.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d2d8085e-61c7-4e34-8e33-69ddcea49996/d2d8085e-61c7-4e34-8e33-69ddcea49996.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br />The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates testified that he met Epstein roughly 12 to 14 times between 2011 and 2014, saying he believed Epstein could help attract major philanthropic donations to global health initiatives through the Gates Foundation. He repeatedly described those meetings as "a mistake," insisted he never visited Epstein's private island, New Mexico ranch, or Florida residence, and said he never witnessed criminal conduct or participated in any of Epstein's illegal activities. Gates told lawmakers he ultimately concluded that Epstein had exaggerated both his financial connections and his ability to raise money for philanthropy.<br /><br /><br />One of the most closely watched portions of the transcript concerned allegations that Epstein sought to pressure Gates using knowledge of Gates' personal life. Gates acknowledged several extramarital affairs and testified that Epstein appeared to have learned about them, later making what Gates described as "veiled" attempts at blackmail by referencing those relationships and seeking money connected to one of the women. Gates said he believed Epstein "contemplated" blackmail but maintained he was never actually blackmailed, never paid Epstein to keep information secret, and never committed crimes with him. Throughout the interview, Gates emphasized that his association with Epstein damaged his judgment and reputation, expressed support for releasing the Epstein files and for continued investigations, and said survivors deserve justice while denying any involvement in Epstein's trafficking operation or abuse of minors.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>977</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Bill Gates Epstein Related Congressional Transcripts (Part 6) (6/29/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-bill-gates-epstein-related-congressional-transcripts-part-6-6-29-26--72739886</link><description><![CDATA[<br />The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates testified that he met Epstein roughly 12 to 14 times between 2011 and 2014, saying he believed Epstein could help attract major philanthropic donations to global health initiatives through the Gates Foundation. He repeatedly described those meetings as "a mistake," insisted he never visited Epstein's private island, New Mexico ranch, or Florida residence, and said he never witnessed criminal conduct or participated in any of Epstein's illegal activities. Gates told lawmakers he ultimately concluded that Epstein had exaggerated both his financial connections and his ability to raise money for philanthropy.<br /><br /><br />One of the most closely watched portions of the transcript concerned allegations that Epstein sought to pressure Gates using knowledge of Gates' personal life. Gates acknowledged several extramarital affairs and testified that Epstein appeared to have learned about them, later making what Gates described as "veiled" attempts at blackmail by referencing those relationships and seeking money connected to one of the women. Gates said he believed Epstein "contemplated" blackmail but maintained he was never actually blackmailed, never paid Epstein to keep information secret, and never committed crimes with him. Throughout the interview, Gates emphasized that his association with Epstein damaged his judgment and reputation, expressed support for releasing the Epstein files and for continued investigations, and said survivors deserve justice while denying any involvement in Epstein's trafficking operation or abuse of minors.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72739886</guid><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 18:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72739886/gatestranscript6.mp3" length="12947165" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/32969a06-7b6d-4582-93f9-02212ae96cbe/32969a06-7b6d-4582-93f9-02212ae96cbe.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/32969a06-7b6d-4582-93f9-02212ae96cbe/32969a06-7b6d-4582-93f9-02212ae96cbe.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/32969a06-7b6d-4582-93f9-02212ae96cbe/32969a06-7b6d-4582-93f9-02212ae96cbe.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br />The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates testified that he met Epstein roughly 12 to 14 times between 2011 and 2014, saying he believed Epstein could help attract major philanthropic donations to global health initiatives through the Gates Foundation. He repeatedly described those meetings as "a mistake," insisted he never visited Epstein's private island, New Mexico ranch, or Florida residence, and said he never witnessed criminal conduct or participated in any of Epstein's illegal activities. Gates told lawmakers he ultimately concluded that Epstein had exaggerated both his financial connections and his ability to raise money for philanthropy.<br /><br /><br />One of the most closely watched portions of the transcript concerned allegations that Epstein sought to pressure Gates using knowledge of Gates' personal life. Gates acknowledged several extramarital affairs and testified that Epstein appeared to have learned about them, later making what Gates described as "veiled" attempts at blackmail by referencing those relationships and seeking money connected to one of the women. Gates said he believed Epstein "contemplated" blackmail but maintained he was never actually blackmailed, never paid Epstein to keep information secret, and never committed crimes with him. Throughout the interview, Gates emphasized that his association with Epstein damaged his judgment and reputation, expressed support for releasing the Epstein files and for continued investigations, and said survivors deserve justice while denying any involvement in Epstein's trafficking operation or abuse of minors.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>810</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Bill Gates Epstein Related Congressional Transcripts (Part 5) (6/29/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-bill-gates-epstein-related-congressional-transcripts-part-5-6-29-26--72739887</link><description><![CDATA[<br />The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates testified that he met Epstein roughly 12 to 14 times between 2011 and 2014, saying he believed Epstein could help attract major philanthropic donations to global health initiatives through the Gates Foundation. He repeatedly described those meetings as "a mistake," insisted he never visited Epstein's private island, New Mexico ranch, or Florida residence, and said he never witnessed criminal conduct or participated in any of Epstein's illegal activities. Gates told lawmakers he ultimately concluded that Epstein had exaggerated both his financial connections and his ability to raise money for philanthropy.<br /><br /><br />One of the most closely watched portions of the transcript concerned allegations that Epstein sought to pressure Gates using knowledge of Gates' personal life. Gates acknowledged several extramarital affairs and testified that Epstein appeared to have learned about them, later making what Gates described as "veiled" attempts at blackmail by referencing those relationships and seeking money connected to one of the women. Gates said he believed Epstein "contemplated" blackmail but maintained he was never actually blackmailed, never paid Epstein to keep information secret, and never committed crimes with him. Throughout the interview, Gates emphasized that his association with Epstein damaged his judgment and reputation, expressed support for releasing the Epstein files and for continued investigations, and said survivors deserve justice while denying any involvement in Epstein's trafficking operation or abuse of minors.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72739887</guid><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72739887/gatestranscript5.mp3" length="14058937" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6ad22712-a186-4575-a0a4-232504f7d8dc/6ad22712-a186-4575-a0a4-232504f7d8dc.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6ad22712-a186-4575-a0a4-232504f7d8dc/6ad22712-a186-4575-a0a4-232504f7d8dc.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6ad22712-a186-4575-a0a4-232504f7d8dc/6ad22712-a186-4575-a0a4-232504f7d8dc.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br />The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates testified that he met Epstein roughly 12 to 14 times between 2011 and 2014, saying he believed Epstein could help attract major philanthropic donations to global health initiatives through the Gates Foundation. He repeatedly described those meetings as "a mistake," insisted he never visited Epstein's private island, New Mexico ranch, or Florida residence, and said he never witnessed criminal conduct or participated in any of Epstein's illegal activities. Gates told lawmakers he ultimately concluded that Epstein had exaggerated both his financial connections and his ability to raise money for philanthropy.<br /><br /><br />One of the most closely watched portions of the transcript concerned allegations that Epstein sought to pressure Gates using knowledge of Gates' personal life. Gates acknowledged several extramarital affairs and testified that Epstein appeared to have learned about them, later making what Gates described as "veiled" attempts at blackmail by referencing those relationships and seeking money connected to one of the women. Gates said he believed Epstein "contemplated" blackmail but maintained he was never actually blackmailed, never paid Epstein to keep information secret, and never committed crimes with him. Throughout the interview, Gates emphasized that his association with Epstein damaged his judgment and reputation, expressed support for releasing the Epstein files and for continued investigations, and said survivors deserve justice while denying any involvement in Epstein's trafficking operation or abuse of minors.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>879</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Bill Gates Epstein Related Congressional Transcripts (Part 4) (6/29/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-bill-gates-epstein-related-congressional-transcripts-part-4-6-29-26--72739883</link><description><![CDATA[<br />The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates testified that he met Epstein roughly 12 to 14 times between 2011 and 2014, saying he believed Epstein could help attract major philanthropic donations to global health initiatives through the Gates Foundation. He repeatedly described those meetings as "a mistake," insisted he never visited Epstein's private island, New Mexico ranch, or Florida residence, and said he never witnessed criminal conduct or participated in any of Epstein's illegal activities. Gates told lawmakers he ultimately concluded that Epstein had exaggerated both his financial connections and his ability to raise money for philanthropy.<br /><br /><br />One of the most closely watched portions of the transcript concerned allegations that Epstein sought to pressure Gates using knowledge of Gates' personal life. Gates acknowledged several extramarital affairs and testified that Epstein appeared to have learned about them, later making what Gates described as "veiled" attempts at blackmail by referencing those relationships and seeking money connected to one of the women. Gates said he believed Epstein "contemplated" blackmail but maintained he was never actually blackmailed, never paid Epstein to keep information secret, and never committed crimes with him. Throughout the interview, Gates emphasized that his association with Epstein damaged his judgment and reputation, expressed support for releasing the Epstein files and for continued investigations, and said survivors deserve justice while denying any involvement in Epstein's trafficking operation or abuse of minors.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72739883</guid><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 14:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72739883/gatestranscript4.mp3" length="11296644" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/dbd4dc0b-6f48-4176-99cd-d04ea0418965/dbd4dc0b-6f48-4176-99cd-d04ea0418965.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/dbd4dc0b-6f48-4176-99cd-d04ea0418965/dbd4dc0b-6f48-4176-99cd-d04ea0418965.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/dbd4dc0b-6f48-4176-99cd-d04ea0418965/dbd4dc0b-6f48-4176-99cd-d04ea0418965.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br />The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates testified that he met Epstein roughly 12 to 14 times between 2011 and 2014, saying he believed Epstein could help attract major philanthropic donations to global health initiatives through the Gates Foundation. He repeatedly described those meetings as "a mistake," insisted he never visited Epstein's private island, New Mexico ranch, or Florida residence, and said he never witnessed criminal conduct or participated in any of Epstein's illegal activities. Gates told lawmakers he ultimately concluded that Epstein had exaggerated both his financial connections and his ability to raise money for philanthropy.<br /><br /><br />One of the most closely watched portions of the transcript concerned allegations that Epstein sought to pressure Gates using knowledge of Gates' personal life. Gates acknowledged several extramarital affairs and testified that Epstein appeared to have learned about them, later making what Gates described as "veiled" attempts at blackmail by referencing those relationships and seeking money connected to one of the women. Gates said he believed Epstein "contemplated" blackmail but maintained he was never actually blackmailed, never paid Epstein to keep information secret, and never committed crimes with him. Throughout the interview, Gates emphasized that his association with Epstein damaged his judgment and reputation, expressed support for releasing the Epstein files and for continued investigations, and said survivors deserve justice while denying any involvement in Epstein's trafficking operation or abuse of minors.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>707</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Judge Orders DOJ to Hand Over More Unredacted Epstein Files (6/29/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/judge-orders-doj-to-hand-over-more-unredacted-epstein-files-6-29-26--72738383</link><description><![CDATA[A federal judge has ordered the Department of Justice to turn over unredacted versions of some Jeffrey Epstein-related files or explain why the redactions should remain in place. U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan sided with independent journalist Katie Phang and the Public Integrity Project, finding that the DOJ likely violated the Epstein Files Transparency Act by withholding or heavily redacting certain materials. The DOJ has until July 2, 2026, to produce less-redacted documents, including sender and recipient information from emails, names of alleged co-conspirators in a draft indictment, and underlying FBI interview notes tied to an allegation against Donald Trump, which Trump has denied and which ABC notes was uncorroborated. Sullivan also ordered the DOJ to publish a log explaining all redactions.<br /><br />The ruling adds another layer of pressure on the DOJ, which has already faced criticism from lawmakers and transparency advocates over how it handled the release of Epstein files after Congress passed the Epstein Files Transparency Act. According to ABC, the department has released thousands of pages but has also been accused of unnecessary redactions, missed deadlines, and withholding millions more pages that officials claim are duplicates, explicit material, or outside the law’s scope. The Public Integrity Project framed the ruling as a major transparency win, arguing that the government ignored the law to protect the rich and powerful, while the DOJ has continued to insist it complied with the statute.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://abcnews.com/Politics/judge-orders-doj-turn-unredacted-epstein-files/story?id=134228532" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Judge orders DOJ to turn over some unredacted Epstein files - ABC News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72738383</guid><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72738383/dojorderedturnovermorefiles.mp3" length="10781719" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b076adb3-d8ab-4f76-b3c7-c9975e74d527/b076adb3-d8ab-4f76-b3c7-c9975e74d527.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b076adb3-d8ab-4f76-b3c7-c9975e74d527/b076adb3-d8ab-4f76-b3c7-c9975e74d527.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b076adb3-d8ab-4f76-b3c7-c9975e74d527/b076adb3-d8ab-4f76-b3c7-c9975e74d527.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A federal judge has ordered the Department of Justice to turn over unredacted versions of some Jeffrey Epstein-related files or explain why the redactions should remain in place. U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan sided with independent journalist...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A federal judge has ordered the Department of Justice to turn over unredacted versions of some Jeffrey Epstein-related files or explain why the redactions should remain in place. U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan sided with independent journalist Katie Phang and the Public Integrity Project, finding that the DOJ likely violated the Epstein Files Transparency Act by withholding or heavily redacting certain materials. The DOJ has until July 2, 2026, to produce less-redacted documents, including sender and recipient information from emails, names of alleged co-conspirators in a draft indictment, and underlying FBI interview notes tied to an allegation against Donald Trump, which Trump has denied and which ABC notes was uncorroborated. Sullivan also ordered the DOJ to publish a log explaining all redactions.<br /><br />The ruling adds another layer of pressure on the DOJ, which has already faced criticism from lawmakers and transparency advocates over how it handled the release of Epstein files after Congress passed the Epstein Files Transparency Act. According to ABC, the department has released thousands of pages but has also been accused of unnecessary redactions, missed deadlines, and withholding millions more pages that officials claim are duplicates, explicit material, or outside the law’s scope. The Public Integrity Project framed the ruling as a major transparency win, arguing that the government ignored the law to protect the rich and powerful, while the DOJ has continued to insist it complied with the statute.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://abcnews.com/Politics/judge-orders-doj-turn-unredacted-epstein-files/story?id=134228532" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Judge orders DOJ to turn over some unredacted Epstein files - ABC News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>674</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Jeffrey Epstein's Friends And The "I forgot" Defense Strategy (6/29/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-s-friends-and-the-i-forgot-defense-strategy-6-29-26--72730530</link><description><![CDATA[Those close to Jeffrey Epstein have developed a remarkably convenient memory problem whenever the questions get specific. Again and again, the public sees the same pattern: powerful people admit they met Epstein, flew with Epstein, took money from Epstein, hired Epstein, accepted introductions from Epstein, visited his homes, answered his calls, or benefited from his network — but when asked what they knew, when they knew it, who else was there, what was discussed, or why they kept dealing with him after his conviction, suddenly the details vanish. Lesley Groff, Epstein’s longtime assistant, told Congress she knew nothing about the alleged abuse and described Epstein as a manipulator who kept people compartmentalized, while Bill Clinton warned that his testimony could be limited by memory gaps from events more than two decades old.<br /><br />That is why the “I don’t recall” routine is so hard to swallow. These were not random acquaintances bumping into Epstein at a cocktail party once; many were executives, politicians, academics, financiers, lawyers, assistants, and social power players whose entire careers depended on remembering meetings, money, favors, travel, relationships, and risk. Yet when Epstein becomes the subject, everyone suddenly becomes foggy, distant, uninformed, and tragically unaware. Maybe some people genuinely missed parts of the truth, but when so many sophisticated people all claim ignorance around the same predator, the same money, the same houses, the same planes, and the same circle of young women, it stops looking like bad memory and starts looking like self-preservation dressed up as confusion.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72730530</guid><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72730530/megaepsteinsuddenonsetamnesia.mp3" length="57057742" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d668d5ae-f990-4cdc-bbe6-b13cbfb6d804/d668d5ae-f990-4cdc-bbe6-b13cbfb6d804.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d668d5ae-f990-4cdc-bbe6-b13cbfb6d804/d668d5ae-f990-4cdc-bbe6-b13cbfb6d804.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d668d5ae-f990-4cdc-bbe6-b13cbfb6d804/d668d5ae-f990-4cdc-bbe6-b13cbfb6d804.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Those close to Jeffrey Epstein have developed a remarkably convenient memory problem whenever the questions get specific. Again and again, the public sees the same pattern: powerful people admit they met Epstein, flew with Epstein, took money from...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Those close to Jeffrey Epstein have developed a remarkably convenient memory problem whenever the questions get specific. Again and again, the public sees the same pattern: powerful people admit they met Epstein, flew with Epstein, took money from Epstein, hired Epstein, accepted introductions from Epstein, visited his homes, answered his calls, or benefited from his network — but when asked what they knew, when they knew it, who else was there, what was discussed, or why they kept dealing with him after his conviction, suddenly the details vanish. Lesley Groff, Epstein’s longtime assistant, told Congress she knew nothing about the alleged abuse and described Epstein as a manipulator who kept people compartmentalized, while Bill Clinton warned that his testimony could be limited by memory gaps from events more than two decades old.<br /><br />That is why the “I don’t recall” routine is so hard to swallow. These were not random acquaintances bumping into Epstein at a cocktail party once; many were executives, politicians, academics, financiers, lawyers, assistants, and social power players whose entire careers depended on remembering meetings, money, favors, travel, relationships, and risk. Yet when Epstein becomes the subject, everyone suddenly becomes foggy, distant, uninformed, and tragically unaware. Maybe some people genuinely missed parts of the truth, but when so many sophisticated people all claim ignorance around the same predator, the same money, the same houses, the same planes, and the same circle of young women, it stops looking like bad memory and starts looking like self-preservation dressed up as confusion.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3567</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Jeffrey Epstein And The  Multiple Front Operations Used To Launder Money (6/29/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-the-multiple-front-operations-used-to-launder-money-6-29-26--72730529</link><description><![CDATA[<br />Jeffrey Epstein understood that respectability could be manufactured, and he invested heavily in creating that appearance through charitable organizations, philanthropic donations, and nonprofit entities. By attaching his name to scientific research, education initiatives, and high-profile charitable causes, he cultivated relationships with academics, business leaders, politicians, and influential public figures who might otherwise have been reluctant to associate with him. Those philanthropic efforts helped project the image of a wealthy financier and benefactor, allowing him to gain access to elite social circles while obscuring the serious allegations that surrounded him. Critics have long argued that these charitable activities functioned not only as public relations tools but also as mechanisms for building influence, credibility, and networks of powerful allies.<br /><br />Epstein also sought legitimacy through financial ventures, including the creation of his own financial institution, the Southern Country International Bank in Antigua. The bank became another pillar of the carefully constructed image that Epstein presented to the world, giving the impression of a sophisticated international financier while providing financial services connected to his broader business empire. Authorities later scrutinized aspects of the bank's operations as part of wider investigations into Epstein's finances, with questions raised about its compliance practices and the movement of funds through his network. Taken together, his charitable organizations and banking interests helped create a veneer of legitimacy that masked the true nature of his activities and enabled him to maintain relationships with influential individuals for years.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72730529</guid><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72730529/megaepsteinfrontoperations.mp3" length="45968866" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/05e7d23e-dbe9-428b-ab20-da61ace04e5b/05e7d23e-dbe9-428b-ab20-da61ace04e5b.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/05e7d23e-dbe9-428b-ab20-da61ace04e5b/05e7d23e-dbe9-428b-ab20-da61ace04e5b.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/05e7d23e-dbe9-428b-ab20-da61ace04e5b/05e7d23e-dbe9-428b-ab20-da61ace04e5b.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jeffrey Epstein understood that respectability could be manufactured, and he invested heavily in creating that appearance through charitable organizations, philanthropic donations, and nonprofit entities. By attaching his name to scientific research,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br />Jeffrey Epstein understood that respectability could be manufactured, and he invested heavily in creating that appearance through charitable organizations, philanthropic donations, and nonprofit entities. By attaching his name to scientific research, education initiatives, and high-profile charitable causes, he cultivated relationships with academics, business leaders, politicians, and influential public figures who might otherwise have been reluctant to associate with him. Those philanthropic efforts helped project the image of a wealthy financier and benefactor, allowing him to gain access to elite social circles while obscuring the serious allegations that surrounded him. Critics have long argued that these charitable activities functioned not only as public relations tools but also as mechanisms for building influence, credibility, and networks of powerful allies.<br /><br />Epstein also sought legitimacy through financial ventures, including the creation of his own financial institution, the Southern Country International Bank in Antigua. The bank became another pillar of the carefully constructed image that Epstein presented to the world, giving the impression of a sophisticated international financier while providing financial services connected to his broader business empire. Authorities later scrutinized aspects of the bank's operations as part of wider investigations into Epstein's finances, with questions raised about its compliance practices and the movement of funds through his network. Taken together, his charitable organizations and banking interests helped create a veneer of legitimacy that masked the true nature of his activities and enabled him to maintain relationships with influential individuals for years.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2874</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   Jeffrey Epstein and His Special Relationship With The Gulf States (6/29/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-his-special-relationship-with-the-gulf-states-6-29-26--72730528</link><description><![CDATA[<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Jeffrey Epstein’s connections in the Gulf appear to have been broader and more deliberate than the older public narrative suggested. Newly released DOJ documents and later reporting show that Epstein was not merely name-dropping Arab royalty or chasing prestige from afar; he was trying to build a network across Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the UAE, and the wider Middle East, inserting himself into conversations about Saudi investment, the Aramco IPO, the Qatar blockade, and access to ruling-family circles. CBS reported that documents show Epstein had contacts with members of the Saudi royal family and traveled to Saudi Arabia in the final years of his life, while Reuters reported that the files show Epstein attempting to cultivate powerful political and business figures across the region.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />That matters because Epstein’s Gulf relationships fit the same pattern seen elsewhere in his life: he sought proximity to money, state power, intelligence-adjacent figures, sovereign wealth, and elite gatekeepers, then used those associations to inflate his importance and preserve access after his 2008 conviction. The most dramatic fallout has involved Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem, the Dubai ports titan and longtime DP World chief, who resigned after DOJ files and reporting exposed years of communications and scrutiny over his Epstein relationship; Reuters and The Guardian both reported that the controversy triggered pressure from major investors and forced a leadership shakeup at DP World. None of that proves every Gulf figure in Epstein’s orbit participated in his crimes, but it does show that his Middle East network was not some minor footnote. It was part of the same global access machine that allowed Epstein to keep moving through elite circles long after he should have been radioactive<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72730528</guid><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72730528/megaepsteinspecialrelationshipsaudi.mp3" length="45613183" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5e3483ca-3de8-4aec-9a2e-55f0ca80b549/5e3483ca-3de8-4aec-9a2e-55f0ca80b549.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5e3483ca-3de8-4aec-9a2e-55f0ca80b549/5e3483ca-3de8-4aec-9a2e-55f0ca80b549.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5e3483ca-3de8-4aec-9a2e-55f0ca80b549/5e3483ca-3de8-4aec-9a2e-55f0ca80b549.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jeffrey Epstein’s connections in the Gulf appear to have been broader and more deliberate than the older public narrative suggested. Newly released DOJ documents and later reporting show that Epstein was not merely name-dropping Arab royalty or...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Jeffrey Epstein’s connections in the Gulf appear to have been broader and more deliberate than the older public narrative suggested. Newly released DOJ documents and later reporting show that Epstein was not merely name-dropping Arab royalty or chasing prestige from afar; he was trying to build a network across Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the UAE, and the wider Middle East, inserting himself into conversations about Saudi investment, the Aramco IPO, the Qatar blockade, and access to ruling-family circles. CBS reported that documents show Epstein had contacts with members of the Saudi royal family and traveled to Saudi Arabia in the final years of his life, while Reuters reported that the files show Epstein attempting to cultivate powerful political and business figures across the region.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />That matters because Epstein’s Gulf relationships fit the same pattern seen elsewhere in his life: he sought proximity to money, state power, intelligence-adjacent figures, sovereign wealth, and elite gatekeepers, then used those associations to inflate his importance and preserve access after his 2008 conviction. The most dramatic fallout has involved Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem, the Dubai ports titan and longtime DP World chief, who resigned after DOJ files and reporting exposed years of communications and scrutiny over his Epstein relationship; Reuters and The Guardian both reported that the controversy triggered pressure from major investors and forced a leadership shakeup at DP World. None of that proves every Gulf figure in Epstein’s orbit participated in his crimes, but it does show that his Middle East network was not some minor footnote. It was part of the same global access machine that allowed Epstein to keep moving through elite circles long after he should have been radioactive<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2851</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The DOJ And Their Long Running Conversation With Epstein's Lawyers (Part 4)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-doj-and-their-long-running-conversation-with-epstein-s-lawyers-part-4--72718549</link><description><![CDATA[The back-and-forth between prosecutors in the Southern District of Florida and Jeffrey Epstein’s legal team during the negotiation of the non-prosecution agreement reads less like an adversarial process and more like a prolonged, collaborative dialogue aimed at reaching terms acceptable to Epstein himself. His attorneys were not simply responding to charges—they were actively shaping the framework of the deal, pushing for concessions on scope, immunity, and exposure not just for Epstein, but for potential co-conspirators. Instead of drawing hard lines, federal prosecutors engaged in a sustained colloquy that entertained defense proposals, adjusted positions, and ultimately bent toward a resolution that prioritized closure over accountability. The result was an agreement that allowed Epstein to plead to minor state charges while securing sweeping federal immunity, effectively shutting down a far broader investigation before it could fully develop.<br /><br />What makes this even more damning is how the Department of Justice appeared willing—if not eager—to accommodate Epstein’s demands at nearly every turn. Rather than treating him as the central figure in a sprawling abuse network, prosecutors treated him like a negotiating partner whose preferences needed to be satisfied. Victims were sidelined, key investigative avenues were abandoned, and the final agreement was structured in a way that insulated not only Epstein but others in his orbit from federal scrutiny. This was not a failure of resources or a lack of evidence—it was a conscious decision to resolve the case on terms dictated by the defense. The DOJ’s handling of this process reflects a systemic breakdown in prosecutorial duty, where the pursuit of justice was subordinated to expediency and deference to power, leaving behind one of the most glaring examples of institutional failure in modern federal criminal practice.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00226107.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00226107.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72718549</guid><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 04:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72718549/villafanapleadealemails4.mp3" length="13749647" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/de2bbc7e-d283-4f41-bbe9-462b9b8c4f1a/de2bbc7e-d283-4f41-bbe9-462b9b8c4f1a.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/de2bbc7e-d283-4f41-bbe9-462b9b8c4f1a/de2bbc7e-d283-4f41-bbe9-462b9b8c4f1a.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/de2bbc7e-d283-4f41-bbe9-462b9b8c4f1a/de2bbc7e-d283-4f41-bbe9-462b9b8c4f1a.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The back-and-forth between prosecutors in the Southern District of Florida and Jeffrey Epstein’s legal team during the negotiation of the non-prosecution agreement reads less like an adversarial process and more like a prolonged, collaborative...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The back-and-forth between prosecutors in the Southern District of Florida and Jeffrey Epstein’s legal team during the negotiation of the non-prosecution agreement reads less like an adversarial process and more like a prolonged, collaborative dialogue aimed at reaching terms acceptable to Epstein himself. His attorneys were not simply responding to charges—they were actively shaping the framework of the deal, pushing for concessions on scope, immunity, and exposure not just for Epstein, but for potential co-conspirators. Instead of drawing hard lines, federal prosecutors engaged in a sustained colloquy that entertained defense proposals, adjusted positions, and ultimately bent toward a resolution that prioritized closure over accountability. The result was an agreement that allowed Epstein to plead to minor state charges while securing sweeping federal immunity, effectively shutting down a far broader investigation before it could fully develop.<br /><br />What makes this even more damning is how the Department of Justice appeared willing—if not eager—to accommodate Epstein’s demands at nearly every turn. Rather than treating him as the central figure in a sprawling abuse network, prosecutors treated him like a negotiating partner whose preferences needed to be satisfied. Victims were sidelined, key investigative avenues were abandoned, and the final agreement was structured in a way that insulated not only Epstein but others in his orbit from federal scrutiny. This was not a failure of resources or a lack of evidence—it was a conscious decision to resolve the case on terms dictated by the defense. The DOJ’s handling of this process reflects a systemic breakdown in prosecutorial duty, where the pursuit of justice was subordinated to expediency and deference to power, leaving behind one of the most glaring examples of institutional failure in modern federal criminal practice.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00226107.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00226107.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>860</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The DOJ And Their Long Running Conversation With Epstein's Lawyers (Part 3)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-doj-and-their-long-running-conversation-with-epstein-s-lawyers-part-3--72718550</link><description><![CDATA[The back-and-forth between prosecutors in the Southern District of Florida and Jeffrey Epstein’s legal team during the negotiation of the non-prosecution agreement reads less like an adversarial process and more like a prolonged, collaborative dialogue aimed at reaching terms acceptable to Epstein himself. His attorneys were not simply responding to charges—they were actively shaping the framework of the deal, pushing for concessions on scope, immunity, and exposure not just for Epstein, but for potential co-conspirators. Instead of drawing hard lines, federal prosecutors engaged in a sustained colloquy that entertained defense proposals, adjusted positions, and ultimately bent toward a resolution that prioritized closure over accountability. The result was an agreement that allowed Epstein to plead to minor state charges while securing sweeping federal immunity, effectively shutting down a far broader investigation before it could fully develop.<br /><br />What makes this even more damning is how the Department of Justice appeared willing—if not eager—to accommodate Epstein’s demands at nearly every turn. Rather than treating him as the central figure in a sprawling abuse network, prosecutors treated him like a negotiating partner whose preferences needed to be satisfied. Victims were sidelined, key investigative avenues were abandoned, and the final agreement was structured in a way that insulated not only Epstein but others in his orbit from federal scrutiny. This was not a failure of resources or a lack of evidence—it was a conscious decision to resolve the case on terms dictated by the defense. The DOJ’s handling of this process reflects a systemic breakdown in prosecutorial duty, where the pursuit of justice was subordinated to expediency and deference to power, leaving behind one of the most glaring examples of institutional failure in modern federal criminal practice.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00226107.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00226107.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72718550</guid><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 02:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72718550/villafanapleadealemails3.mp3" length="13846613" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/55eaf635-a3e5-45d4-9b35-400c928eb786/55eaf635-a3e5-45d4-9b35-400c928eb786.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/55eaf635-a3e5-45d4-9b35-400c928eb786/55eaf635-a3e5-45d4-9b35-400c928eb786.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/55eaf635-a3e5-45d4-9b35-400c928eb786/55eaf635-a3e5-45d4-9b35-400c928eb786.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The back-and-forth between prosecutors in the Southern District of Florida and Jeffrey Epstein’s legal team during the negotiation of the non-prosecution agreement reads less like an adversarial process and more like a prolonged, collaborative...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The back-and-forth between prosecutors in the Southern District of Florida and Jeffrey Epstein’s legal team during the negotiation of the non-prosecution agreement reads less like an adversarial process and more like a prolonged, collaborative dialogue aimed at reaching terms acceptable to Epstein himself. His attorneys were not simply responding to charges—they were actively shaping the framework of the deal, pushing for concessions on scope, immunity, and exposure not just for Epstein, but for potential co-conspirators. Instead of drawing hard lines, federal prosecutors engaged in a sustained colloquy that entertained defense proposals, adjusted positions, and ultimately bent toward a resolution that prioritized closure over accountability. The result was an agreement that allowed Epstein to plead to minor state charges while securing sweeping federal immunity, effectively shutting down a far broader investigation before it could fully develop.<br /><br />What makes this even more damning is how the Department of Justice appeared willing—if not eager—to accommodate Epstein’s demands at nearly every turn. Rather than treating him as the central figure in a sprawling abuse network, prosecutors treated him like a negotiating partner whose preferences needed to be satisfied. Victims were sidelined, key investigative avenues were abandoned, and the final agreement was structured in a way that insulated not only Epstein but others in his orbit from federal scrutiny. This was not a failure of resources or a lack of evidence—it was a conscious decision to resolve the case on terms dictated by the defense. The DOJ’s handling of this process reflects a systemic breakdown in prosecutorial duty, where the pursuit of justice was subordinated to expediency and deference to power, leaving behind one of the most glaring examples of institutional failure in modern federal criminal practice.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00226107.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00226107.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>866</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The DOJ And Their Long Running Conversation With Epstein's Lawyers (Part 2)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-doj-and-their-long-running-conversation-with-epstein-s-lawyers-part-2--72718551</link><description><![CDATA[The back-and-forth between prosecutors in the Southern District of Florida and Jeffrey Epstein’s legal team during the negotiation of the non-prosecution agreement reads less like an adversarial process and more like a prolonged, collaborative dialogue aimed at reaching terms acceptable to Epstein himself. His attorneys were not simply responding to charges—they were actively shaping the framework of the deal, pushing for concessions on scope, immunity, and exposure not just for Epstein, but for potential co-conspirators. Instead of drawing hard lines, federal prosecutors engaged in a sustained colloquy that entertained defense proposals, adjusted positions, and ultimately bent toward a resolution that prioritized closure over accountability. The result was an agreement that allowed Epstein to plead to minor state charges while securing sweeping federal immunity, effectively shutting down a far broader investigation before it could fully develop.<br /><br />What makes this even more damning is how the Department of Justice appeared willing—if not eager—to accommodate Epstein’s demands at nearly every turn. Rather than treating him as the central figure in a sprawling abuse network, prosecutors treated him like a negotiating partner whose preferences needed to be satisfied. Victims were sidelined, key investigative avenues were abandoned, and the final agreement was structured in a way that insulated not only Epstein but others in his orbit from federal scrutiny. This was not a failure of resources or a lack of evidence—it was a conscious decision to resolve the case on terms dictated by the defense. The DOJ’s handling of this process reflects a systemic breakdown in prosecutorial duty, where the pursuit of justice was subordinated to expediency and deference to power, leaving behind one of the most glaring examples of institutional failure in modern federal criminal practice.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00226107.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00226107.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72718551</guid><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 00:30:06 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72718551/villafanapleadealemails2.mp3" length="11410329" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c18d157d-ec14-418f-8db4-802ee4d96be0/c18d157d-ec14-418f-8db4-802ee4d96be0.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c18d157d-ec14-418f-8db4-802ee4d96be0/c18d157d-ec14-418f-8db4-802ee4d96be0.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c18d157d-ec14-418f-8db4-802ee4d96be0/c18d157d-ec14-418f-8db4-802ee4d96be0.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The back-and-forth between prosecutors in the Southern District of Florida and Jeffrey Epstein’s legal team during the negotiation of the non-prosecution agreement reads less like an adversarial process and more like a prolonged, collaborative...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The back-and-forth between prosecutors in the Southern District of Florida and Jeffrey Epstein’s legal team during the negotiation of the non-prosecution agreement reads less like an adversarial process and more like a prolonged, collaborative dialogue aimed at reaching terms acceptable to Epstein himself. His attorneys were not simply responding to charges—they were actively shaping the framework of the deal, pushing for concessions on scope, immunity, and exposure not just for Epstein, but for potential co-conspirators. Instead of drawing hard lines, federal prosecutors engaged in a sustained colloquy that entertained defense proposals, adjusted positions, and ultimately bent toward a resolution that prioritized closure over accountability. The result was an agreement that allowed Epstein to plead to minor state charges while securing sweeping federal immunity, effectively shutting down a far broader investigation before it could fully develop.<br /><br />What makes this even more damning is how the Department of Justice appeared willing—if not eager—to accommodate Epstein’s demands at nearly every turn. Rather than treating him as the central figure in a sprawling abuse network, prosecutors treated him like a negotiating partner whose preferences needed to be satisfied. Victims were sidelined, key investigative avenues were abandoned, and the final agreement was structured in a way that insulated not only Epstein but others in his orbit from federal scrutiny. This was not a failure of resources or a lack of evidence—it was a conscious decision to resolve the case on terms dictated by the defense. The DOJ’s handling of this process reflects a systemic breakdown in prosecutorial duty, where the pursuit of justice was subordinated to expediency and deference to power, leaving behind one of the most glaring examples of institutional failure in modern federal criminal practice.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00226107.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00226107.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>714</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The DOJ And Their Long Running Conversation With Epstein's Lawyers (Part 1)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-doj-and-their-long-running-conversation-with-epstein-s-lawyers-part-1--72718548</link><description><![CDATA[The back-and-forth between prosecutors in the Southern District of Florida and Jeffrey Epstein’s legal team during the negotiation of the non-prosecution agreement reads less like an adversarial process and more like a prolonged, collaborative dialogue aimed at reaching terms acceptable to Epstein himself. His attorneys were not simply responding to charges—they were actively shaping the framework of the deal, pushing for concessions on scope, immunity, and exposure not just for Epstein, but for potential co-conspirators. Instead of drawing hard lines, federal prosecutors engaged in a sustained colloquy that entertained defense proposals, adjusted positions, and ultimately bent toward a resolution that prioritized closure over accountability. The result was an agreement that allowed Epstein to plead to minor state charges while securing sweeping federal immunity, effectively shutting down a far broader investigation before it could fully develop.<br /><br />What makes this even more damning is how the Department of Justice appeared willing—if not eager—to accommodate Epstein’s demands at nearly every turn. Rather than treating him as the central figure in a sprawling abuse network, prosecutors treated him like a negotiating partner whose preferences needed to be satisfied. Victims were sidelined, key investigative avenues were abandoned, and the final agreement was structured in a way that insulated not only Epstein but others in his orbit from federal scrutiny. This was not a failure of resources or a lack of evidence—it was a conscious decision to resolve the case on terms dictated by the defense. The DOJ’s handling of this process reflects a systemic breakdown in prosecutorial duty, where the pursuit of justice was subordinated to expediency and deference to power, leaving behind one of the most glaring examples of institutional failure in modern federal criminal practice.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00226107.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00226107.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72718548</guid><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2026 22:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72718548/villafanapleadealemails1.mp3" length="11470097" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c18c255a-09ba-46ff-9531-9a7f727bd5b2/c18c255a-09ba-46ff-9531-9a7f727bd5b2.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c18c255a-09ba-46ff-9531-9a7f727bd5b2/c18c255a-09ba-46ff-9531-9a7f727bd5b2.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c18c255a-09ba-46ff-9531-9a7f727bd5b2/c18c255a-09ba-46ff-9531-9a7f727bd5b2.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The back-and-forth between prosecutors in the Southern District of Florida and Jeffrey Epstein’s legal team during the negotiation of the non-prosecution agreement reads less like an adversarial process and more like a prolonged, collaborative...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The back-and-forth between prosecutors in the Southern District of Florida and Jeffrey Epstein’s legal team during the negotiation of the non-prosecution agreement reads less like an adversarial process and more like a prolonged, collaborative dialogue aimed at reaching terms acceptable to Epstein himself. His attorneys were not simply responding to charges—they were actively shaping the framework of the deal, pushing for concessions on scope, immunity, and exposure not just for Epstein, but for potential co-conspirators. Instead of drawing hard lines, federal prosecutors engaged in a sustained colloquy that entertained defense proposals, adjusted positions, and ultimately bent toward a resolution that prioritized closure over accountability. The result was an agreement that allowed Epstein to plead to minor state charges while securing sweeping federal immunity, effectively shutting down a far broader investigation before it could fully develop.<br /><br />What makes this even more damning is how the Department of Justice appeared willing—if not eager—to accommodate Epstein’s demands at nearly every turn. Rather than treating him as the central figure in a sprawling abuse network, prosecutors treated him like a negotiating partner whose preferences needed to be satisfied. Victims were sidelined, key investigative avenues were abandoned, and the final agreement was structured in a way that insulated not only Epstein but others in his orbit from federal scrutiny. This was not a failure of resources or a lack of evidence—it was a conscious decision to resolve the case on terms dictated by the defense. The DOJ’s handling of this process reflects a systemic breakdown in prosecutorial duty, where the pursuit of justice was subordinated to expediency and deference to power, leaving behind one of the most glaring examples of institutional failure in modern federal criminal practice.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00226107.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00226107.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>717</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Bill Gates Epstein Related Congressional Transcripts (Part 3) (6/28/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-bill-gates-epstein-related-congressional-transcripts-part-3-6-28-26--72728767</link><description><![CDATA[<br />The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates testified that he met Epstein roughly 12 to 14 times between 2011 and 2014, saying he believed Epstein could help attract major philanthropic donations to global health initiatives through the Gates Foundation. He repeatedly described those meetings as "a mistake," insisted he never visited Epstein's private island, New Mexico ranch, or Florida residence, and said he never witnessed criminal conduct or participated in any of Epstein's illegal activities. Gates told lawmakers he ultimately concluded that Epstein had exaggerated both his financial connections and his ability to raise money for philanthropy.<br /><br /><br />One of the most closely watched portions of the transcript concerned allegations that Epstein sought to pressure Gates using knowledge of Gates' personal life. Gates acknowledged several extramarital affairs and testified that Epstein appeared to have learned about them, later making what Gates described as "veiled" attempts at blackmail by referencing those relationships and seeking money connected to one of the women. Gates said he believed Epstein "contemplated" blackmail but maintained he was never actually blackmailed, never paid Epstein to keep information secret, and never committed crimes with him. Throughout the interview, Gates emphasized that his association with Epstein damaged his judgment and reputation, expressed support for releasing the Epstein files and for continued investigations, and said survivors deserve justice while denying any involvement in Epstein's trafficking operation or abuse of minors.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72728767</guid><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72728767/gatestranscript3.mp3" length="15805170" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/134dfef8-1eb2-4107-bfc9-4c2dedab2c0a/134dfef8-1eb2-4107-bfc9-4c2dedab2c0a.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/134dfef8-1eb2-4107-bfc9-4c2dedab2c0a/134dfef8-1eb2-4107-bfc9-4c2dedab2c0a.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/134dfef8-1eb2-4107-bfc9-4c2dedab2c0a/134dfef8-1eb2-4107-bfc9-4c2dedab2c0a.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br />The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates testified that he met Epstein roughly 12 to 14 times between 2011 and 2014, saying he believed Epstein could help attract major philanthropic donations to global health initiatives through the Gates Foundation. He repeatedly described those meetings as "a mistake," insisted he never visited Epstein's private island, New Mexico ranch, or Florida residence, and said he never witnessed criminal conduct or participated in any of Epstein's illegal activities. Gates told lawmakers he ultimately concluded that Epstein had exaggerated both his financial connections and his ability to raise money for philanthropy.<br /><br /><br />One of the most closely watched portions of the transcript concerned allegations that Epstein sought to pressure Gates using knowledge of Gates' personal life. Gates acknowledged several extramarital affairs and testified that Epstein appeared to have learned about them, later making what Gates described as "veiled" attempts at blackmail by referencing those relationships and seeking money connected to one of the women. Gates said he believed Epstein "contemplated" blackmail but maintained he was never actually blackmailed, never paid Epstein to keep information secret, and never committed crimes with him. Throughout the interview, Gates emphasized that his association with Epstein damaged his judgment and reputation, expressed support for releasing the Epstein files and for continued investigations, and said survivors deserve justice while denying any involvement in Epstein's trafficking operation or abuse of minors.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>988</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Bill Gates Epstein Related Congressional Transcripts (Part 2) (6/28/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-bill-gates-epstein-related-congressional-transcripts-part-2-6-28-26--72728764</link><description><![CDATA[<br />The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates testified that he met Epstein roughly 12 to 14 times between 2011 and 2014, saying he believed Epstein could help attract major philanthropic donations to global health initiatives through the Gates Foundation. He repeatedly described those meetings as "a mistake," insisted he never visited Epstein's private island, New Mexico ranch, or Florida residence, and said he never witnessed criminal conduct or participated in any of Epstein's illegal activities. Gates told lawmakers he ultimately concluded that Epstein had exaggerated both his financial connections and his ability to raise money for philanthropy.<br /><br /><br />One of the most closely watched portions of the transcript concerned allegations that Epstein sought to pressure Gates using knowledge of Gates' personal life. Gates acknowledged several extramarital affairs and testified that Epstein appeared to have learned about them, later making what Gates described as "veiled" attempts at blackmail by referencing those relationships and seeking money connected to one of the women. Gates said he believed Epstein "contemplated" blackmail but maintained he was never actually blackmailed, never paid Epstein to keep information secret, and never committed crimes with him. Throughout the interview, Gates emphasized that his association with Epstein damaged his judgment and reputation, expressed support for releasing the Epstein files and for continued investigations, and said survivors deserve justice while denying any involvement in Epstein's trafficking operation or abuse of minors.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72728764</guid><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2026 18:30:06 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72728764/gatestranscript2.mp3" length="14127900" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/edcd62c0-e466-4e2e-9507-92269bc16fad/edcd62c0-e466-4e2e-9507-92269bc16fad.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/edcd62c0-e466-4e2e-9507-92269bc16fad/edcd62c0-e466-4e2e-9507-92269bc16fad.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/edcd62c0-e466-4e2e-9507-92269bc16fad/edcd62c0-e466-4e2e-9507-92269bc16fad.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br />The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates testified that he met Epstein roughly 12 to 14 times between 2011 and 2014, saying he believed Epstein could help attract major philanthropic donations to global health initiatives through the Gates Foundation. He repeatedly described those meetings as "a mistake," insisted he never visited Epstein's private island, New Mexico ranch, or Florida residence, and said he never witnessed criminal conduct or participated in any of Epstein's illegal activities. Gates told lawmakers he ultimately concluded that Epstein had exaggerated both his financial connections and his ability to raise money for philanthropy.<br /><br /><br />One of the most closely watched portions of the transcript concerned allegations that Epstein sought to pressure Gates using knowledge of Gates' personal life. Gates acknowledged several extramarital affairs and testified that Epstein appeared to have learned about them, later making what Gates described as "veiled" attempts at blackmail by referencing those relationships and seeking money connected to one of the women. Gates said he believed Epstein "contemplated" blackmail but maintained he was never actually blackmailed, never paid Epstein to keep information secret, and never committed crimes with him. Throughout the interview, Gates emphasized that his association with Epstein damaged his judgment and reputation, expressed support for releasing the Epstein files and for continued investigations, and said survivors deserve justice while denying any involvement in Epstein's trafficking operation or abuse of minors.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>883</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Bill Gates Epstein Related Congressional Transcripts (Part 1) (6/28/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-bill-gates-epstein-related-congressional-transcripts-part-1-6-28-26--72728765</link><description><![CDATA[<br />The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates testified that he met Epstein roughly 12 to 14 times between 2011 and 2014, saying he believed Epstein could help attract major philanthropic donations to global health initiatives through the Gates Foundation. He repeatedly described those meetings as "a mistake," insisted he never visited Epstein's private island, New Mexico ranch, or Florida residence, and said he never witnessed criminal conduct or participated in any of Epstein's illegal activities. Gates told lawmakers he ultimately concluded that Epstein had exaggerated both his financial connections and his ability to raise money for philanthropy.<br /><br /><br />One of the most closely watched portions of the transcript concerned allegations that Epstein sought to pressure Gates using knowledge of Gates' personal life. Gates acknowledged several extramarital affairs and testified that Epstein appeared to have learned about them, later making what Gates described as "veiled" attempts at blackmail by referencing those relationships and seeking money connected to one of the women. Gates said he believed Epstein "contemplated" blackmail but maintained he was never actually blackmailed, never paid Epstein to keep information secret, and never committed crimes with him. Throughout the interview, Gates emphasized that his association with Epstein damaged his judgment and reputation, expressed support for releasing the Epstein files and for continued investigations, and said survivors deserve justice while denying any involvement in Epstein's trafficking operation or abuse of minors.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72728765</guid><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2026 16:30:05 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72728765/gatestranscript1.mp3" length="13199195" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/df04603d-292d-4400-a1c1-20afc1170704/df04603d-292d-4400-a1c1-20afc1170704.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/df04603d-292d-4400-a1c1-20afc1170704/df04603d-292d-4400-a1c1-20afc1170704.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/df04603d-292d-4400-a1c1-20afc1170704/df04603d-292d-4400-a1c1-20afc1170704.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br />The nearly six-hour congressional interview focused on why Bill Gates continued meeting with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein's 2008 conviction, what Gates knew about Epstein's conduct, and whether Epstein attempted to gain leverage over him. Gates testified that he met Epstein roughly 12 to 14 times between 2011 and 2014, saying he believed Epstein could help attract major philanthropic donations to global health initiatives through the Gates Foundation. He repeatedly described those meetings as "a mistake," insisted he never visited Epstein's private island, New Mexico ranch, or Florida residence, and said he never witnessed criminal conduct or participated in any of Epstein's illegal activities. Gates told lawmakers he ultimately concluded that Epstein had exaggerated both his financial connections and his ability to raise money for philanthropy.<br /><br /><br />One of the most closely watched portions of the transcript concerned allegations that Epstein sought to pressure Gates using knowledge of Gates' personal life. Gates acknowledged several extramarital affairs and testified that Epstein appeared to have learned about them, later making what Gates described as "veiled" attempts at blackmail by referencing those relationships and seeking money connected to one of the women. Gates said he believed Epstein "contemplated" blackmail but maintained he was never actually blackmailed, never paid Epstein to keep information secret, and never committed crimes with him. Throughout the interview, Gates emphasized that his association with Epstein damaged his judgment and reputation, expressed support for releasing the Epstein files and for continued investigations, and said survivors deserve justice while denying any involvement in Epstein's trafficking operation or abuse of minors.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bill-Gates-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>825</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Academia And The Epstein Hypocrisy (6/28/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-academia-and-the-epstein-hypocrisy-6-28-26--72717123</link><description><![CDATA[The Epstein scandal exposed how deep corruption runs, but higher academia mostly slipped away untouched. Despite Epstein having offices at Harvard, donations to MIT, and close ties with professors, universities escaped the same scrutiny that crushed others. They played dumb, claimed ignorance, and hid behind words like “research” while pocketing predator money. Meanwhile, they still preach ethics and morality to the rest of us, acting like they’re society’s conscience while proving they’ll side with cash over principle every single time.<br /><br />For working-class folks, the double standard is glaring. Ordinary people get hammered for the smallest mistakes, while billion-dollar institutions with political connections remain untouchable. Justice isn’t blind; it looks straight at the bank account before moving. The universities knew what they were doing, yet faced no real punishment. Until someone has the guts to drag academia into the same light as everyone else, it’s on us to keep the pressure on, to not forget, and to make sure their role in this rotten system never gets buried.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72717123</guid><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2026 14:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72717123/megaepsteinacademiahypocrisy.mp3" length="45480272" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/14ab8c22-5334-4e82-ace0-66cb2af8fc0f/14ab8c22-5334-4e82-ace0-66cb2af8fc0f.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/14ab8c22-5334-4e82-ace0-66cb2af8fc0f/14ab8c22-5334-4e82-ace0-66cb2af8fc0f.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/14ab8c22-5334-4e82-ace0-66cb2af8fc0f/14ab8c22-5334-4e82-ace0-66cb2af8fc0f.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Epstein scandal exposed how deep corruption runs, but higher academia mostly slipped away untouched. Despite Epstein having offices at Harvard, donations to MIT, and close ties with professors, universities escaped the same scrutiny that crushed...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Epstein scandal exposed how deep corruption runs, but higher academia mostly slipped away untouched. Despite Epstein having offices at Harvard, donations to MIT, and close ties with professors, universities escaped the same scrutiny that crushed others. They played dumb, claimed ignorance, and hid behind words like “research” while pocketing predator money. Meanwhile, they still preach ethics and morality to the rest of us, acting like they’re society’s conscience while proving they’ll side with cash over principle every single time.<br /><br />For working-class folks, the double standard is glaring. Ordinary people get hammered for the smallest mistakes, while billion-dollar institutions with political connections remain untouchable. Justice isn’t blind; it looks straight at the bank account before moving. The universities knew what they were doing, yet faced no real punishment. Until someone has the guts to drag academia into the same light as everyone else, it’s on us to keep the pressure on, to not forget, and to make sure their role in this rotten system never gets buried.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2843</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Jeffrey Epstein And His Good Buddy Reid Hoffman (6/28/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-his-good-buddy-reid-hoffman-6-28-26--72717121</link><description><![CDATA[Reid Hoffman’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein is tenuous, controversial, and wrapped in layers of public explanation and regret. Hoffman has admitted that he invited Epstein to a 2015 dinner in Palo Alto (with luminaries like Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg) as part of fundraising efforts for the MIT Media Lab—on the basis that MIT leadership had “vetted” Epstein. He later issued a public apology, saying that while he believed the invitation was appropriate at the time, it was a serious error in judgment to associate with Epstein post-conviction.<br /><br />But deeper reporting has further complicated Hoffman’s narrative. Documents indicate that Hoffman visited Epstein’s private island, Little St. James, in 2014 (after Epstein’s 2008 conviction), apparently connected with MIT-related fundraising. Other records show plans for Hoffman to stay in Epstein’s New York townhouse and attend social engagements with him and other tech elites. Hoffman’s defenders say his ties were limited to philanthropy and fundraising, but critics argue that even those interactions — especially occurring after Epstein’s well-known legal disgrace — raise troubling questions about judgment, complicity, and the degree to which Epstein was able to rehab his social capital among elite tech circles.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72717121</guid><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2026 12:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72717121/megaepsteinandhispalreidhoffman.mp3" length="37197157" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b3005700-c884-417d-ab7d-bcf1690ed364/b3005700-c884-417d-ab7d-bcf1690ed364.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b3005700-c884-417d-ab7d-bcf1690ed364/b3005700-c884-417d-ab7d-bcf1690ed364.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b3005700-c884-417d-ab7d-bcf1690ed364/b3005700-c884-417d-ab7d-bcf1690ed364.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Reid Hoffman’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein is tenuous, controversial, and wrapped in layers of public explanation and regret. Hoffman has admitted that he invited Epstein to a 2015 dinner in Palo Alto (with luminaries like Elon Musk and Mark...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Reid Hoffman’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein is tenuous, controversial, and wrapped in layers of public explanation and regret. Hoffman has admitted that he invited Epstein to a 2015 dinner in Palo Alto (with luminaries like Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg) as part of fundraising efforts for the MIT Media Lab—on the basis that MIT leadership had “vetted” Epstein. He later issued a public apology, saying that while he believed the invitation was appropriate at the time, it was a serious error in judgment to associate with Epstein post-conviction.<br /><br />But deeper reporting has further complicated Hoffman’s narrative. Documents indicate that Hoffman visited Epstein’s private island, Little St. James, in 2014 (after Epstein’s 2008 conviction), apparently connected with MIT-related fundraising. Other records show plans for Hoffman to stay in Epstein’s New York townhouse and attend social engagements with him and other tech elites. Hoffman’s defenders say his ties were limited to philanthropy and fundraising, but critics argue that even those interactions — especially occurring after Epstein’s well-known legal disgrace — raise troubling questions about judgment, complicity, and the degree to which Epstein was able to rehab his social capital among elite tech circles.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2325</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   Juan Alessi And The Deposition Given To Detective Recarey (6/28/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-juan-alessi-and-the-deposition-given-to-detective-recarey-6-28-26--72717122</link><description><![CDATA[a sworn statement given by Juan Alessi to Palm Beach law enforcement during the early phase of the Epstein investigation. In that statement, Alessi describes his role as the house manager at Epstein’s Palm Beach residence and recounts that young girls regularly came to the home to provide “massages.” He stated that these visits were frequent and routine, and that over time he noticed the girls appeared to be getting younger. Alessi specifically recalled questioning whether some of the girls were as young as 16 or 17, signaling that concerns about age were present well before the case became public.<br /><br />Alessi’s statement is significant because it documents staff-level awareness of troubling conduct inside Epstein’s home at an early stage of the investigation. While the document does not take the form of a later civil-style deposition transcript, it is a formal sworn account given directly to investigators involved in the case, including those working under Joe Recarey. The statement reinforces that Epstein’s operation was not hidden from household staff and that warning signs were visible to law enforcement as early as 2005. It stands as contemporaneous evidence that allegations involving underage girls were known, documented, and taken seriously enough to be memorialized in sworn law enforcement records—long before the controversial prosecutorial decisions that followed.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Freedom%20of%20Information%20Act%20(FOIA)/Florida/Epstein%20Part%2016%20(Redacted).pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein Part 16 (Redacted).pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72717122</guid><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2026 10:30:05 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72717122/megaalessidepositionreiter.mp3" length="21513239" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7483bbf4-7c9e-493b-82b8-7d1e8433ccdd/7483bbf4-7c9e-493b-82b8-7d1e8433ccdd.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7483bbf4-7c9e-493b-82b8-7d1e8433ccdd/7483bbf4-7c9e-493b-82b8-7d1e8433ccdd.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7483bbf4-7c9e-493b-82b8-7d1e8433ccdd/7483bbf4-7c9e-493b-82b8-7d1e8433ccdd.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>a sworn statement given by Juan Alessi to Palm Beach law enforcement during the early phase of the Epstein investigation. In that statement, Alessi describes his role as the house manager at Epstein’s Palm Beach residence and recounts that young girls...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[a sworn statement given by Juan Alessi to Palm Beach law enforcement during the early phase of the Epstein investigation. In that statement, Alessi describes his role as the house manager at Epstein’s Palm Beach residence and recounts that young girls regularly came to the home to provide “massages.” He stated that these visits were frequent and routine, and that over time he noticed the girls appeared to be getting younger. Alessi specifically recalled questioning whether some of the girls were as young as 16 or 17, signaling that concerns about age were present well before the case became public.<br /><br />Alessi’s statement is significant because it documents staff-level awareness of troubling conduct inside Epstein’s home at an early stage of the investigation. While the document does not take the form of a later civil-style deposition transcript, it is a formal sworn account given directly to investigators involved in the case, including those working under Joe Recarey. The statement reinforces that Epstein’s operation was not hidden from household staff and that warning signs were visible to law enforcement as early as 2005. It stands as contemporaneous evidence that allegations involving underage girls were known, documented, and taken seriously enough to be memorialized in sworn law enforcement records—long before the controversial prosecutorial decisions that followed.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Freedom%20of%20Information%20Act%20(FOIA)/Florida/Epstein%20Part%2016%20(Redacted).pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein Part 16 (Redacted).pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1345</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The Reckoning Epstein’s Enablers Never Saw Coming  (6/28/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-reckoning-epstein-s-enablers-never-saw-coming-6-28-26--72717120</link><description><![CDATA[People scrambling to defend Jeffrey Epstein’s enablers are acting like the public demanding accountability is some sort of pitchfork mob obsessed with cancel culture. They’re pretending that exposing the people who protected a serial predator is the same thing as ruining someone’s career over an old joke or a bad tweet. It’s a deliberate distortion—an attempt to blur the line between trivial social punishment and the long-overdue reckoning that comes when power is abused, evidence piles up, and silence is no longer an option. These defenders are confused—maybe intentionally—because they know admitting the truth means admitting years of complicity, negligence, and willful blindness.<br /><br /><br />What’s happening now isn’t vindictive. It isn’t impulsive. It isn’t moral grandstanding. It’s consequence culture—the natural outcome when survivors fight for justice, evidence resurfaces, and institutions can no longer bury the truth under NDAs, sealed records, and PR cleanup squads. Consequences are not the same as cancellation. Consequences are what happen when people who held power used it to protect a predator, silence victims, and keep a criminal empire running. If you’re terrified that facing scrutiny equals cancellation, maybe that says more about what you’ve been hiding than anything else.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72717120</guid><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2026 08:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72717120/megaepsteinreckoningneversawcoming.mp3" length="31782496" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/89bffd42-baea-49aa-a303-3f2ab90c36eb/89bffd42-baea-49aa-a303-3f2ab90c36eb.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/89bffd42-baea-49aa-a303-3f2ab90c36eb/89bffd42-baea-49aa-a303-3f2ab90c36eb.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/89bffd42-baea-49aa-a303-3f2ab90c36eb/89bffd42-baea-49aa-a303-3f2ab90c36eb.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>People scrambling to defend Jeffrey Epstein’s enablers are acting like the public demanding accountability is some sort of pitchfork mob obsessed with cancel culture. They’re pretending that exposing the people who protected a serial predator is the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[People scrambling to defend Jeffrey Epstein’s enablers are acting like the public demanding accountability is some sort of pitchfork mob obsessed with cancel culture. They’re pretending that exposing the people who protected a serial predator is the same thing as ruining someone’s career over an old joke or a bad tweet. It’s a deliberate distortion—an attempt to blur the line between trivial social punishment and the long-overdue reckoning that comes when power is abused, evidence piles up, and silence is no longer an option. These defenders are confused—maybe intentionally—because they know admitting the truth means admitting years of complicity, negligence, and willful blindness.<br /><br /><br />What’s happening now isn’t vindictive. It isn’t impulsive. It isn’t moral grandstanding. It’s consequence culture—the natural outcome when survivors fight for justice, evidence resurfaces, and institutions can no longer bury the truth under NDAs, sealed records, and PR cleanup squads. Consequences are not the same as cancellation. Consequences are what happen when people who held power used it to protect a predator, silence victims, and keep a criminal empire running. If you’re terrified that facing scrutiny equals cancellation, maybe that says more about what you’ve been hiding than anything else.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1987</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Jeffrey Epstein And His Favorite Pilot (6/27/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-his-favorite-pilot-6-27-26--72717124</link><description><![CDATA[Larry Visoski was Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime pilot and aviation manager, a man who spent decades flying Epstein across the globe while overseeing the logistics of the financier’s private aviation empire. Visoski operated the aircraft that became infamous in connection with Epstein’s activities—flying routes between New York, Palm Beach, the U.S. Virgin Islands, New Mexico, and Europe. As the pilot responsible for coordinating flights, manifests, and passenger movements, Visoski was positioned at the operational center of Epstein’s travel network. His job was not limited to sitting in the cockpit; he managed flight operations, worked closely with Epstein’s inner circle, and facilitated the movement of a steady stream of passengers to Epstein’s various properties. That proximity meant Visoski had a front-row seat to the constant flow of powerful guests, staff members, and young women who moved through Epstein’s orbit during the years when allegations of abuse were mounting. In practical terms, Visoski was one of the key logistical gatekeepers of Epstein’s lifestyle, helping sustain the infrastructure that allowed Epstein to shuttle people between properties with remarkable ease.<br /><br />Visoski has consistently portrayed himself as little more than a professional pilot who kept his head down and focused on flying the plane, but that explanation has drawn skepticism from many observers who find it implausible that someone so embedded in Epstein’s operations could have remained oblivious to what was happening around him. The pilot spent years transporting Epstein and his entourage to the very locations where abuse was later alleged to have taken place, and he maintained the aircraft that served as the connective tissue between Epstein’s homes and social network. Critics argue that this role placed Visoski in a position where ignorance becomes difficult to reconcile with the scale and duration of the operation. While Visoski has never been charged with a crime, the idea that a central logistical figure in Epstein’s travel apparatus somehow noticed nothing unusual has been widely viewed as a convenient narrative rather than a persuasive one. For many examining Epstein’s network, Visoski represents a broader problem in the scandal: the number of insiders who were close enough to the machinery of Epstein’s world to keep it running, yet who later insisted they saw nothing that raised alarms.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72717124</guid><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72717124/megaepsteinfavoritepilotvisoski.mp3" length="54326796" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/610a642c-f2b6-4165-bdca-54945734def7/610a642c-f2b6-4165-bdca-54945734def7.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/610a642c-f2b6-4165-bdca-54945734def7/610a642c-f2b6-4165-bdca-54945734def7.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/610a642c-f2b6-4165-bdca-54945734def7/610a642c-f2b6-4165-bdca-54945734def7.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Larry Visoski was Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime pilot and aviation manager, a man who spent decades flying Epstein across the globe while overseeing the logistics of the financier’s private aviation empire. Visoski operated the aircraft that became...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Larry Visoski was Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime pilot and aviation manager, a man who spent decades flying Epstein across the globe while overseeing the logistics of the financier’s private aviation empire. Visoski operated the aircraft that became infamous in connection with Epstein’s activities—flying routes between New York, Palm Beach, the U.S. Virgin Islands, New Mexico, and Europe. As the pilot responsible for coordinating flights, manifests, and passenger movements, Visoski was positioned at the operational center of Epstein’s travel network. His job was not limited to sitting in the cockpit; he managed flight operations, worked closely with Epstein’s inner circle, and facilitated the movement of a steady stream of passengers to Epstein’s various properties. That proximity meant Visoski had a front-row seat to the constant flow of powerful guests, staff members, and young women who moved through Epstein’s orbit during the years when allegations of abuse were mounting. In practical terms, Visoski was one of the key logistical gatekeepers of Epstein’s lifestyle, helping sustain the infrastructure that allowed Epstein to shuttle people between properties with remarkable ease.<br /><br />Visoski has consistently portrayed himself as little more than a professional pilot who kept his head down and focused on flying the plane, but that explanation has drawn skepticism from many observers who find it implausible that someone so embedded in Epstein’s operations could have remained oblivious to what was happening around him. The pilot spent years transporting Epstein and his entourage to the very locations where abuse was later alleged to have taken place, and he maintained the aircraft that served as the connective tissue between Epstein’s homes and social network. Critics argue that this role placed Visoski in a position where ignorance becomes difficult to reconcile with the scale and duration of the operation. While Visoski has never been charged with a crime, the idea that a central logistical figure in Epstein’s travel apparatus somehow noticed nothing unusual has been widely viewed as a convenient narrative rather than a persuasive one. For many examining Epstein’s network, Visoski represents a broader problem in the scandal: the number of insiders who were close enough to the machinery of Epstein’s world to keep it running, yet who later insisted they saw nothing that raised alarms.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3396</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Bill Clinton And The Message To Ghislaine Maxwell</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/bill-clinton-and-the-message-to-ghislaine-maxwell--72652152</link><description><![CDATA[Former President **Bill Clinton’s inscription to Ghislaine Maxwell — “To Ghislaine, with love” — in a signed copy of his memoir is more than just a casual gesture; it reeks of intimacy and poor judgment. At a time when Maxwell was already deeply enmeshed in Epstein’s world, such a public figure choosing to gift her a personalized keepsake raises troubling questions about the depth of his relationship with her. It underscores the hypocrisy of powerful leaders who later sought to distance themselves from Epstein and Maxwell, even as evidence continues to surface showing they were more than passing acquaintances.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72652152</guid><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2026 04:30:08 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72652152/clintmessagemaxwell.mp3" length="15521410" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3a853ced-6826-44cc-8ace-06d4c403fdf1/3a853ced-6826-44cc-8ace-06d4c403fdf1.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3a853ced-6826-44cc-8ace-06d4c403fdf1/3a853ced-6826-44cc-8ace-06d4c403fdf1.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3a853ced-6826-44cc-8ace-06d4c403fdf1/3a853ced-6826-44cc-8ace-06d4c403fdf1.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Former President **Bill Clinton’s inscription to Ghislaine Maxwell — “To Ghislaine, with love” — in a signed copy of his memoir is more than just a casual gesture; it reeks of intimacy and poor judgment. At a time when Maxwell was already deeply...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Former President **Bill Clinton’s inscription to Ghislaine Maxwell — “To Ghislaine, with love” — in a signed copy of his memoir is more than just a casual gesture; it reeks of intimacy and poor judgment. At a time when Maxwell was already deeply enmeshed in Epstein’s world, such a public figure choosing to gift her a personalized keepsake raises troubling questions about the depth of his relationship with her. It underscores the hypocrisy of powerful leaders who later sought to distance themselves from Epstein and Maxwell, even as evidence continues to surface showing they were more than passing acquaintances.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>971</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>More  Context On The Lawsuit Filed By The Epstein Survivors Against The USVI</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/more-context-on-the-lawsuit-filed-by-the-epstein-survivors-against-the-usvi--72652140</link><description><![CDATA[The lawsuit filed by Epstein’s survivors against the U.S. Virgin Islands and its political leadership was a direct attempt to hold the government itself accountable for what the plaintiffs describe as years of willful blindness, facilitation, and corruption that allowed Epstein’s trafficking operation to flourish openly on USVI soil. In the complaint, survivors allege that senior Virgin Islands officials knew Epstein was sexually abusing and trafficking underage girls at Little St. James and related properties, yet continued to provide him with extraordinary protections. According to the suit, those protections included favorable tax treatment, lax regulatory oversight, assistance with immigration and travel issues, and a general refusal to investigate credible reports of abuse. The survivors frame the USVI not as a passive bystander, but as an active enabler whose officials allegedly chose Epstein’s money and political influence over the safety of children.<br /><br />In context, the lawsuit is significant because it shifts the focus away from Epstein as a lone criminal and squarely onto the governmental systems that, according to the plaintiffs, made his crimes possible for decades. The survivors argue that Epstein’s operation could not have functioned at the scale it did without institutional cooperation or deliberate neglect, particularly in a small jurisdiction where his activities were widely known. By naming politicians and government entities, the suit seeks to pierce the long-standing narrative that Epstein merely “slipped through the cracks,” instead asserting that the cracks were deliberately widened for him. The case is as much about exposing how power protects itself as it is about compensation, positioning the USVI as a test case for whether governments can be held civilly liable for enabling large-scale sexual exploitation through corruption, indifference, and abuse of authority.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72652140</guid><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2026 02:30:06 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72652140/moredetailsaboutlawsuit.mp3" length="22030253" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/530f41de-4f8a-45e5-9e01-82249769fda6/530f41de-4f8a-45e5-9e01-82249769fda6.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/530f41de-4f8a-45e5-9e01-82249769fda6/530f41de-4f8a-45e5-9e01-82249769fda6.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/530f41de-4f8a-45e5-9e01-82249769fda6/530f41de-4f8a-45e5-9e01-82249769fda6.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The lawsuit filed by Epstein’s survivors against the U.S. Virgin Islands and its political leadership was a direct attempt to hold the government itself accountable for what the plaintiffs describe as years of willful blindness, facilitation, and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The lawsuit filed by Epstein’s survivors against the U.S. Virgin Islands and its political leadership was a direct attempt to hold the government itself accountable for what the plaintiffs describe as years of willful blindness, facilitation, and corruption that allowed Epstein’s trafficking operation to flourish openly on USVI soil. In the complaint, survivors allege that senior Virgin Islands officials knew Epstein was sexually abusing and trafficking underage girls at Little St. James and related properties, yet continued to provide him with extraordinary protections. According to the suit, those protections included favorable tax treatment, lax regulatory oversight, assistance with immigration and travel issues, and a general refusal to investigate credible reports of abuse. The survivors frame the USVI not as a passive bystander, but as an active enabler whose officials allegedly chose Epstein’s money and political influence over the safety of children.<br /><br />In context, the lawsuit is significant because it shifts the focus away from Epstein as a lone criminal and squarely onto the governmental systems that, according to the plaintiffs, made his crimes possible for decades. The survivors argue that Epstein’s operation could not have functioned at the scale it did without institutional cooperation or deliberate neglect, particularly in a small jurisdiction where his activities were widely known. By naming politicians and government entities, the suit seeks to pierce the long-standing narrative that Epstein merely “slipped through the cracks,” instead asserting that the cracks were deliberately widened for him. The case is as much about exposing how power protects itself as it is about compensation, positioning the USVI as a test case for whether governments can be held civilly liable for enabling large-scale sexual exploitation through corruption, indifference, and abuse of authority.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1377</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Prosecutors Describe Nicholas Tartaglione's Crimes In Gruesome Detail</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/prosecutors-describe-nicholas-tartaglione-s-crimes-in-gruesome-detail--72652142</link><description><![CDATA[Federal prosecutors alleged that Nicholas Tartaglione orchestrated the April 2016 kidnapping and murder of Martin Luna over what they described as stolen drug money. According to the government’s account, Tartaglione lured Luna to the Likquid Lounge in Chester, New York, under the pretense of resolving the dispute. Luna arrived with his nephews, Miguel Luna and Urbano Santiago, and their friend Hector Gutierrez. Prosecutors said Tartaglione restrained the group, took Martin Luna into a back room or bathroom, interrogated and beat him, and then strangled him with a zip tie. The other three men were allegedly held captive because they had witnessed what happened and had unexpectedly accompanied Luna to the meeting.<br /><br />The government said the victims were then transported to Tartaglione’s property in Otisville, where Martin Luna’s body was buried and the remaining three men were shot to eliminate witnesses. Prosecutors alleged that Tartaglione directed the operation with help from Joseph Biggs, Georgios Gounaris and Jason Sullivan, who were accused of participating in the abductions, killings and disposal of the bodies. Investigators eventually recovered all four victims from a grave on Tartaglione’s property after a cooperating defendant led authorities to the location. The prosecution presented the killings as the culmination of Tartaglione’s involvement in cocaine trafficking and his effort to recover money while concealing the murder of Martin Luna and silencing everyone who had seen it.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72652142</guid><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2026 00:30:05 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72652142/prosecutorsdescribehowtartaglione.mp3" length="25338819" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2a0e6646-aa88-409f-920d-91d83329eeea/2a0e6646-aa88-409f-920d-91d83329eeea.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2a0e6646-aa88-409f-920d-91d83329eeea/2a0e6646-aa88-409f-920d-91d83329eeea.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2a0e6646-aa88-409f-920d-91d83329eeea/2a0e6646-aa88-409f-920d-91d83329eeea.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Federal prosecutors alleged that Nicholas Tartaglione orchestrated the April 2016 kidnapping and murder of Martin Luna over what they described as stolen drug money. According to the government’s account, Tartaglione lured Luna to the Likquid Lounge...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Federal prosecutors alleged that Nicholas Tartaglione orchestrated the April 2016 kidnapping and murder of Martin Luna over what they described as stolen drug money. According to the government’s account, Tartaglione lured Luna to the Likquid Lounge in Chester, New York, under the pretense of resolving the dispute. Luna arrived with his nephews, Miguel Luna and Urbano Santiago, and their friend Hector Gutierrez. Prosecutors said Tartaglione restrained the group, took Martin Luna into a back room or bathroom, interrogated and beat him, and then strangled him with a zip tie. The other three men were allegedly held captive because they had witnessed what happened and had unexpectedly accompanied Luna to the meeting.<br /><br />The government said the victims were then transported to Tartaglione’s property in Otisville, where Martin Luna’s body was buried and the remaining three men were shot to eliminate witnesses. Prosecutors alleged that Tartaglione directed the operation with help from Joseph Biggs, Georgios Gounaris and Jason Sullivan, who were accused of participating in the abductions, killings and disposal of the bodies. Investigators eventually recovered all four victims from a grave on Tartaglione’s property after a cooperating defendant led authorities to the location. The prosecution presented the killings as the culmination of Tartaglione’s involvement in cocaine trafficking and his effort to recover money while concealing the murder of Martin Luna and silencing everyone who had seen it.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1584</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Chief Medical  Examiner Barbra Sampson Refutes Dr. Baden's Claims About Epstein's Death</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/chief-medical-examiner-barbra-sampson-refutes-dr-baden-s-claims-about-epstein-s-death--72652154</link><description><![CDATA[After Jeffrey Epstein’s death in 2019, the official ruling from the New York City Medical Examiner’s Office was that he died by suicide in his Manhattan jail cell. However, that conclusion came under intense scrutiny when Dr. Michael Baden, a well-known forensic pathologist hired by Epstein’s brother, publicly suggested that the injuries were more consistent with homicide. In response, Barbara Sampson, then–Chief Medical Examiner of New York City, forcefully defended the office’s findings and rejected Baden’s assertions. She stated unequivocally that the autopsy results, combined with the investigation, supported suicide by hanging, not foul play.<br /><br /><br />Sampson’s rebuttal was meant to put to rest the growing wave of speculation, but it also underscored the divide between official conclusions and the swirl of doubt fueled by Epstein’s powerful connections and the suspicious circumstances of his death. By directly countering Baden, she stood by the credibility of her office’s work, stressing that outside opinions could not outweigh the evidence they had gathered. Still, the public’s mistrust lingered, and her statements became part of the broader controversy over whether Epstein’s death was truly a suicide or part of a larger cover-up.<br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72652154</guid><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2026 22:30:05 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72652154/mediexnyc.mp3" length="25680292" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c5ac0ac4-f5ab-4cdf-b468-8e3a830cc088/c5ac0ac4-f5ab-4cdf-b468-8e3a830cc088.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c5ac0ac4-f5ab-4cdf-b468-8e3a830cc088/c5ac0ac4-f5ab-4cdf-b468-8e3a830cc088.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c5ac0ac4-f5ab-4cdf-b468-8e3a830cc088/c5ac0ac4-f5ab-4cdf-b468-8e3a830cc088.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>After Jeffrey Epstein’s death in 2019, the official ruling from the New York City Medical Examiner’s Office was that he died by suicide in his Manhattan jail cell. However, that conclusion came under intense scrutiny when Dr. Michael Baden, a...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[After Jeffrey Epstein’s death in 2019, the official ruling from the New York City Medical Examiner’s Office was that he died by suicide in his Manhattan jail cell. However, that conclusion came under intense scrutiny when Dr. Michael Baden, a well-known forensic pathologist hired by Epstein’s brother, publicly suggested that the injuries were more consistent with homicide. In response, Barbara Sampson, then–Chief Medical Examiner of New York City, forcefully defended the office’s findings and rejected Baden’s assertions. She stated unequivocally that the autopsy results, combined with the investigation, supported suicide by hanging, not foul play.<br /><br /><br />Sampson’s rebuttal was meant to put to rest the growing wave of speculation, but it also underscored the divide between official conclusions and the swirl of doubt fueled by Epstein’s powerful connections and the suspicious circumstances of his death. By directly countering Baden, she stood by the credibility of her office’s work, stressing that outside opinions could not outweigh the evidence they had gathered. Still, the public’s mistrust lingered, and her statements became part of the broader controversy over whether Epstein’s death was truly a suicide or part of a larger cover-up.<br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1605</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Revenge Of The Nonce:  Andrew And The Alleged Plot For Revenge Against The Monarchy (6/27/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-revenge-of-the-nonce-andrew-and-the-alleged-plot-for-revenge-against-the-monarchy-6-27-26--72715836</link><description><![CDATA[Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor is reportedly furious with King Charles and blames his older brother for his collapse inside the royal family, according to claims attributed to unnamed sources and repeated by Sky News Australia. The claims portray Andrew as “hellbent on revenge,” angry over being pushed out of royal life, removed from Royal Lodge, and increasingly isolated from the institution he once represented. The central allegation is that Andrew believes Charles is deliberately trying to erase him and the York branch of the family, including Sarah Ferguson, Princess Beatrice, and Princess Eugenie.<br /><br />The piece frames Andrew as a growing headache for the monarchy because, in this telling, he refuses to accept responsibility for the scandals that destroyed his public role and instead sees himself as the victim of palace politics. It also claims Andrew wants more financial support from Charles and may be willing to make trouble if he feels his family is being cut off or humiliated further. The broader point is that Andrew, already disgraced by his Epstein ties and stripped of most public royal standing, is now being depicted as someone with little left to lose — which makes him a dangerous internal problem for a royal family trying to contain the damage and move on.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.skynews.com.au/lifestyle/celebrity-life/nothing-much-left-to-lose-andrew-mountbattenwindsor-hellbent-on-revenge-as-he-blames-one-key-royal-for-his-downfall/news-story/a9aed496a5e26019da3ec717e9631cfb" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">'Nothing much left to lose': Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor 'hellbent on revenge' as he blames one key royal for his downfall | Sky News Australia</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72715836</guid><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2026 20:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72715836/andrewplansrevenge.mp3" length="10804706" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7cbc3b86-c777-47d7-bd2f-4cda32d38a11/7cbc3b86-c777-47d7-bd2f-4cda32d38a11.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7cbc3b86-c777-47d7-bd2f-4cda32d38a11/7cbc3b86-c777-47d7-bd2f-4cda32d38a11.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7cbc3b86-c777-47d7-bd2f-4cda32d38a11/7cbc3b86-c777-47d7-bd2f-4cda32d38a11.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor is reportedly furious with King Charles and blames his older brother for his collapse inside the royal family, according to claims attributed to unnamed sources and repeated by Sky News Australia. The claims portray Andrew...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor is reportedly furious with King Charles and blames his older brother for his collapse inside the royal family, according to claims attributed to unnamed sources and repeated by Sky News Australia. The claims portray Andrew as “hellbent on revenge,” angry over being pushed out of royal life, removed from Royal Lodge, and increasingly isolated from the institution he once represented. The central allegation is that Andrew believes Charles is deliberately trying to erase him and the York branch of the family, including Sarah Ferguson, Princess Beatrice, and Princess Eugenie.<br /><br />The piece frames Andrew as a growing headache for the monarchy because, in this telling, he refuses to accept responsibility for the scandals that destroyed his public role and instead sees himself as the victim of palace politics. It also claims Andrew wants more financial support from Charles and may be willing to make trouble if he feels his family is being cut off or humiliated further. The broader point is that Andrew, already disgraced by his Epstein ties and stripped of most public royal standing, is now being depicted as someone with little left to lose — which makes him a dangerous internal problem for a royal family trying to contain the damage and move on.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.skynews.com.au/lifestyle/celebrity-life/nothing-much-left-to-lose-andrew-mountbattenwindsor-hellbent-on-revenge-as-he-blames-one-key-royal-for-his-downfall/news-story/a9aed496a5e26019da3ec717e9631cfb" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">'Nothing much left to lose': Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor 'hellbent on revenge' as he blames one key royal for his downfall | Sky News Australia</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>676</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Tova Noel And The Transcript From Her Congressional Testimony (Part 13) (6/27/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/tova-noel-and-the-transcript-from-her-congressional-testimony-part-13-6-27-26--72715835</link><description><![CDATA[Tova Noel, one of the two correctional officers assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center’s Special Housing Unit on the night Jeffrey Epstein died, told the House Oversight Committee that she failed to conduct the required inmate checks and later signed records falsely indicating that the rounds had been completed. Noel described an understaffed, poorly managed facility in which she was exhausted, inadequately trained and assigned duties beyond her normal responsibilities. She maintained that she last saw Epstein alive during the evening medication round and observed nothing that made her believe he was preparing to harm himself. Noel also testified that Epstein received unusual accommodations, including extra bed linens, a CPAP machine and access to medication that appeared different from the treatment ordinarily given to other prisoners.<br /><br />Noel denied having any role in Epstein’s death, receiving money in connection with him or knowing anything about an alleged payment to facilitate access to his cell. She also rejected claims that she was the unidentified orange-colored figure seen moving toward Epstein’s tier at approximately 10:39 p.m., insisting that she never returned to the area and could not explain what—or who—the surveillance image showed. Although Noel said she believed Epstein died by suicide because he was supposedly alone inside the cell, her testimony did little to resolve the most important unanswered questions: why required checks were abandoned, why Epstein remained without a cellmate, who or what appeared near the tier, and how so many security procedures failed simultaneously. Instead, her account reinforced the picture of extraordinary negligence, special treatment and institutional dysfunction surrounding the death of the most consequential prisoner in federal custody.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72715835</guid><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2026 18:30:08 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72715835/tovanoelcongresstranscript13.mp3" length="20105552" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/65192a88-bc34-47c3-9062-5bd110af3afe/65192a88-bc34-47c3-9062-5bd110af3afe.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/65192a88-bc34-47c3-9062-5bd110af3afe/65192a88-bc34-47c3-9062-5bd110af3afe.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/65192a88-bc34-47c3-9062-5bd110af3afe/65192a88-bc34-47c3-9062-5bd110af3afe.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Tova Noel, one of the two correctional officers assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center’s Special Housing Unit on the night Jeffrey Epstein died, told the House Oversight Committee that she failed to conduct the required inmate checks and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Tova Noel, one of the two correctional officers assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center’s Special Housing Unit on the night Jeffrey Epstein died, told the House Oversight Committee that she failed to conduct the required inmate checks and later signed records falsely indicating that the rounds had been completed. Noel described an understaffed, poorly managed facility in which she was exhausted, inadequately trained and assigned duties beyond her normal responsibilities. She maintained that she last saw Epstein alive during the evening medication round and observed nothing that made her believe he was preparing to harm himself. Noel also testified that Epstein received unusual accommodations, including extra bed linens, a CPAP machine and access to medication that appeared different from the treatment ordinarily given to other prisoners.<br /><br />Noel denied having any role in Epstein’s death, receiving money in connection with him or knowing anything about an alleged payment to facilitate access to his cell. She also rejected claims that she was the unidentified orange-colored figure seen moving toward Epstein’s tier at approximately 10:39 p.m., insisting that she never returned to the area and could not explain what—or who—the surveillance image showed. Although Noel said she believed Epstein died by suicide because he was supposedly alone inside the cell, her testimony did little to resolve the most important unanswered questions: why required checks were abandoned, why Epstein remained without a cellmate, who or what appeared near the tier, and how so many security procedures failed simultaneously. Instead, her account reinforced the picture of extraordinary negligence, special treatment and institutional dysfunction surrounding the death of the most consequential prisoner in federal custody.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1257</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Tova Noel And The Transcript From Her Congressional Testimony (Part 12) (6/27/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/tova-noel-and-the-transcript-from-her-congressional-testimony-part-12-6-27-26--72715834</link><description><![CDATA[Tova Noel, one of the two correctional officers assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center’s Special Housing Unit on the night Jeffrey Epstein died, told the House Oversight Committee that she failed to conduct the required inmate checks and later signed records falsely indicating that the rounds had been completed. Noel described an understaffed, poorly managed facility in which she was exhausted, inadequately trained and assigned duties beyond her normal responsibilities. She maintained that she last saw Epstein alive during the evening medication round and observed nothing that made her believe he was preparing to harm himself. Noel also testified that Epstein received unusual accommodations, including extra bed linens, a CPAP machine and access to medication that appeared different from the treatment ordinarily given to other prisoners.<br /><br />Noel denied having any role in Epstein’s death, receiving money in connection with him or knowing anything about an alleged payment to facilitate access to his cell. She also rejected claims that she was the unidentified orange-colored figure seen moving toward Epstein’s tier at approximately 10:39 p.m., insisting that she never returned to the area and could not explain what—or who—the surveillance image showed. Although Noel said she believed Epstein died by suicide because he was supposedly alone inside the cell, her testimony did little to resolve the most important unanswered questions: why required checks were abandoned, why Epstein remained without a cellmate, who or what appeared near the tier, and how so many security procedures failed simultaneously. Instead, her account reinforced the picture of extraordinary negligence, special treatment and institutional dysfunction surrounding the death of the most consequential prisoner in federal custody.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72715834</guid><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2026 16:30:06 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72715834/tovanoelcongresstranscript12.mp3" length="11145343" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8a0305fa-dbda-4f91-a51e-3d1651193d4b/8a0305fa-dbda-4f91-a51e-3d1651193d4b.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8a0305fa-dbda-4f91-a51e-3d1651193d4b/8a0305fa-dbda-4f91-a51e-3d1651193d4b.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8a0305fa-dbda-4f91-a51e-3d1651193d4b/8a0305fa-dbda-4f91-a51e-3d1651193d4b.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Tova Noel, one of the two correctional officers assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center’s Special Housing Unit on the night Jeffrey Epstein died, told the House Oversight Committee that she failed to conduct the required inmate checks and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Tova Noel, one of the two correctional officers assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center’s Special Housing Unit on the night Jeffrey Epstein died, told the House Oversight Committee that she failed to conduct the required inmate checks and later signed records falsely indicating that the rounds had been completed. Noel described an understaffed, poorly managed facility in which she was exhausted, inadequately trained and assigned duties beyond her normal responsibilities. She maintained that she last saw Epstein alive during the evening medication round and observed nothing that made her believe he was preparing to harm himself. Noel also testified that Epstein received unusual accommodations, including extra bed linens, a CPAP machine and access to medication that appeared different from the treatment ordinarily given to other prisoners.<br /><br />Noel denied having any role in Epstein’s death, receiving money in connection with him or knowing anything about an alleged payment to facilitate access to his cell. She also rejected claims that she was the unidentified orange-colored figure seen moving toward Epstein’s tier at approximately 10:39 p.m., insisting that she never returned to the area and could not explain what—or who—the surveillance image showed. Although Noel said she believed Epstein died by suicide because he was supposedly alone inside the cell, her testimony did little to resolve the most important unanswered questions: why required checks were abandoned, why Epstein remained without a cellmate, who or what appeared near the tier, and how so many security procedures failed simultaneously. Instead, her account reinforced the picture of extraordinary negligence, special treatment and institutional dysfunction surrounding the death of the most consequential prisoner in federal custody.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>697</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Jeffrey Epstein's Former Butler Juan Alessi And His Testimony At Maxwell's Trial (6/27/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-s-former-butler-juan-alessi-and-his-testimony-at-maxwell-s-trial-6-27-26--72704595</link><description><![CDATA[During the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, Juan Alessi—Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime estate manager—testified as a key insider who provided jurors with a ground-level view of how Epstein’s properties operated on a daily basis. Alessi described his responsibilities managing Epstein’s homes, particularly in Palm Beach, and explained how young girls were regularly brought to the residence for what were described as “massages.” He testified that this was not an occasional or hidden occurrence but a routine part of life at the house, with frequent visits by underage girls and systems in place to manage their arrivals and departures. Alessi also confirmed that payments were made to the girls, reinforcing the prosecution’s argument that the abuse was organized and transactional rather than spontaneous or misunderstood.<br /><br />Alessi’s testimony was especially damaging because it placed Ghislaine Maxwell directly inside the operational structure of Epstein’s abuse. He told the jury that Maxwell was regularly present at the Palm Beach home, was aware of the girls coming and going, and at times interacted with them herself. His account undermined the defense’s attempt to portray Maxwell as detached from Epstein’s criminal conduct, instead depicting her as someone who knew exactly what was happening inside the house. By confirming the routine nature of the visits and Maxwell’s proximity to them, Alessi’s testimony helped establish knowledge, continuity, and intent—critical elements for the prosecution’s case.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72704595</guid><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2026 14:30:05 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72704595/megaalessitestimonymaxtrial.mp3" length="72922218" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1ec1c236-4d7f-4723-8cd2-0c017818bda9/1ec1c236-4d7f-4723-8cd2-0c017818bda9.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1ec1c236-4d7f-4723-8cd2-0c017818bda9/1ec1c236-4d7f-4723-8cd2-0c017818bda9.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1ec1c236-4d7f-4723-8cd2-0c017818bda9/1ec1c236-4d7f-4723-8cd2-0c017818bda9.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>During the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, Juan Alessi—Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime estate manager—testified as a key insider who provided jurors with a ground-level view of how Epstein’s properties operated on a daily basis. Alessi described his...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[During the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, Juan Alessi—Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime estate manager—testified as a key insider who provided jurors with a ground-level view of how Epstein’s properties operated on a daily basis. Alessi described his responsibilities managing Epstein’s homes, particularly in Palm Beach, and explained how young girls were regularly brought to the residence for what were described as “massages.” He testified that this was not an occasional or hidden occurrence but a routine part of life at the house, with frequent visits by underage girls and systems in place to manage their arrivals and departures. Alessi also confirmed that payments were made to the girls, reinforcing the prosecution’s argument that the abuse was organized and transactional rather than spontaneous or misunderstood.<br /><br />Alessi’s testimony was especially damaging because it placed Ghislaine Maxwell directly inside the operational structure of Epstein’s abuse. He told the jury that Maxwell was regularly present at the Palm Beach home, was aware of the girls coming and going, and at times interacted with them herself. His account undermined the defense’s attempt to portray Maxwell as detached from Epstein’s criminal conduct, instead depicting her as someone who knew exactly what was happening inside the house. By confirming the routine nature of the visits and Maxwell’s proximity to them, Alessi’s testimony helped establish knowledge, continuity, and intent—critical elements for the prosecution’s case.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4558</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   Jeffrey Epstein's Pilots And  Their Testimony During The Ghislaine Maxwell Trial (6/27/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-s-pilots-and-their-testimony-during-the-ghislaine-maxwell-trial-6-27-26--72704594</link><description><![CDATA[During the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, testimony from Larry Visoski, Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime pilot, provided jurors with a detailed look at Epstein’s extensive travel patterns and the people who routinely accompanied him. Visoski described flying Epstein on numerous domestic and international trips over many years, including to the U.S. Virgin Islands, New Mexico, and overseas destinations. He testified that young women and girls were frequently passengers on these flights, sometimes traveling without parents or clear explanations for their presence. Visoski’s testimony helped establish the scale and regularity of Epstein’s operations, showing that the movement of underage girls was not incidental but a repeated and normalized part of Epstein’s private air travel.<br /><br />David Rodgers, Epstein’s former property manager in the U.S. Virgin Islands, complemented Visoski’s testimony by explaining how Epstein’s residences functioned on the ground, particularly on Little Saint James. Rodgers described seeing young girls at the island, observing their interactions with Epstein, and understanding that their presence was sexual in nature. He testified that the girls were often brought to Epstein as part of an expected routine and that staff understood not to interfere. Together, Visoski and Rodgers provided corroborating insider accounts—one from the air and one from the ground—that reinforced the prosecution’s argument that Ghislaine Maxwell was part of a broader, sustained system that enabled Epstein’s abuse rather than a peripheral figure disconnected from it.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72704594</guid><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2026 12:30:05 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72704594/megaepsteinpilotstestimonymaxtrial.mp3" length="63080533" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/95bd7ce7-ecc3-4e3e-8826-bd56a3033d91/95bd7ce7-ecc3-4e3e-8826-bd56a3033d91.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/95bd7ce7-ecc3-4e3e-8826-bd56a3033d91/95bd7ce7-ecc3-4e3e-8826-bd56a3033d91.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/95bd7ce7-ecc3-4e3e-8826-bd56a3033d91/95bd7ce7-ecc3-4e3e-8826-bd56a3033d91.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>During the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, testimony from Larry Visoski, Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime pilot, provided jurors with a detailed look at Epstein’s extensive travel patterns and the people who routinely accompanied him. Visoski described flying...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[During the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, testimony from Larry Visoski, Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime pilot, provided jurors with a detailed look at Epstein’s extensive travel patterns and the people who routinely accompanied him. Visoski described flying Epstein on numerous domestic and international trips over many years, including to the U.S. Virgin Islands, New Mexico, and overseas destinations. He testified that young women and girls were frequently passengers on these flights, sometimes traveling without parents or clear explanations for their presence. Visoski’s testimony helped establish the scale and regularity of Epstein’s operations, showing that the movement of underage girls was not incidental but a repeated and normalized part of Epstein’s private air travel.<br /><br />David Rodgers, Epstein’s former property manager in the U.S. Virgin Islands, complemented Visoski’s testimony by explaining how Epstein’s residences functioned on the ground, particularly on Little Saint James. Rodgers described seeing young girls at the island, observing their interactions with Epstein, and understanding that their presence was sexual in nature. He testified that the girls were often brought to Epstein as part of an expected routine and that staff understood not to interfere. Together, Visoski and Rodgers provided corroborating insider accounts—one from the air and one from the ground—that reinforced the prosecution’s argument that Ghislaine Maxwell was part of a broader, sustained system that enabled Epstein’s abuse rather than a peripheral figure disconnected from it.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3943</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Carolyn Gives  Testimony At The Maxwell Trial And An Interview After (6/27/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-carolyn-gives-testimony-at-the-maxwell-trial-and-an-interview-after-6-27-26--72704593</link><description><![CDATA[During the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, testimony from a woman identified as “Carolyn” focused on the mechanics of recruitment and grooming that brought young girls into Jeffrey Epstein’s orbit. Carolyn described how she was first approached as a teenager under the guise of legitimate work and easy money, only to find herself drawn into a world where sexualized behavior was quickly normalized. She testified that what began as vague or misleading promises escalated into explicit expectations, with little room to refuse once she was inside Epstein’s environment. Her account highlighted how confusion, financial pressure, and authority dynamics were used to keep young girls compliant and silent.<br /><br /><br />Carolyn’s testimony also placed Ghislaine Maxwell within that environment, describing Maxwell as a visible and authoritative presence in Epstein’s life and homes. She testified that Maxwell exercised control, gave instructions to staff, and appeared fully aware of the girls coming and going. According to Carolyn, Maxwell’s behavior conveyed ownership and supervision over the household, undermining claims that she was detached from or unaware of Epstein’s activities. By situating Maxwell inside the daily operations of Epstein’s residences, Carolyn’s account contributed to the broader narrative that Maxwell knowingly participated in maintaining the structure that enabled Epstein’s abuse.<br /><br /><br />After testifying, Carolyn gave an interview in which she emphasized that taking the stand was about setting the record straight rather than seeking attention or vindication. She described the experience as emotionally draining but necessary, explaining that she felt a responsibility to speak honestly about what she witnessed inside Jeffrey Epstein’s household and the environment that staff were expected to accept as normal. Carolyn reiterated that the routine presence of young girls was never subtle and that staff were implicitly discouraged from questioning what was happening. She also made clear that, in her view, Ghislaine Maxwell was not a peripheral figure but someone who exerted authority and awareness within that world. In reflecting on her testimony, Carolyn framed it as a way to counter years of minimization and denial, underscoring that the abuse Epstein carried out was enabled by a system that many people saw—and chose not to stop.<br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72704593</guid><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2026 10:30:05 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72704593/megacarolyntestimonyinterviewafter.mp3" length="74913794" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c2288f52-bc68-49a6-a25e-0987aac71dd7/c2288f52-bc68-49a6-a25e-0987aac71dd7.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c2288f52-bc68-49a6-a25e-0987aac71dd7/c2288f52-bc68-49a6-a25e-0987aac71dd7.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c2288f52-bc68-49a6-a25e-0987aac71dd7/c2288f52-bc68-49a6-a25e-0987aac71dd7.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>During the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, testimony from a woman identified as “Carolyn” focused on the mechanics of recruitment and grooming that brought young girls into Jeffrey Epstein’s orbit. Carolyn described how she was first approached as a teenager...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[During the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, testimony from a woman identified as “Carolyn” focused on the mechanics of recruitment and grooming that brought young girls into Jeffrey Epstein’s orbit. Carolyn described how she was first approached as a teenager under the guise of legitimate work and easy money, only to find herself drawn into a world where sexualized behavior was quickly normalized. She testified that what began as vague or misleading promises escalated into explicit expectations, with little room to refuse once she was inside Epstein’s environment. Her account highlighted how confusion, financial pressure, and authority dynamics were used to keep young girls compliant and silent.<br /><br /><br />Carolyn’s testimony also placed Ghislaine Maxwell within that environment, describing Maxwell as a visible and authoritative presence in Epstein’s life and homes. She testified that Maxwell exercised control, gave instructions to staff, and appeared fully aware of the girls coming and going. According to Carolyn, Maxwell’s behavior conveyed ownership and supervision over the household, undermining claims that she was detached from or unaware of Epstein’s activities. By situating Maxwell inside the daily operations of Epstein’s residences, Carolyn’s account contributed to the broader narrative that Maxwell knowingly participated in maintaining the structure that enabled Epstein’s abuse.<br /><br /><br />After testifying, Carolyn gave an interview in which she emphasized that taking the stand was about setting the record straight rather than seeking attention or vindication. She described the experience as emotionally draining but necessary, explaining that she felt a responsibility to speak honestly about what she witnessed inside Jeffrey Epstein’s household and the environment that staff were expected to accept as normal. Carolyn reiterated that the routine presence of young girls was never subtle and that staff were implicitly discouraged from questioning what was happening. She also made clear that, in her view, Ghislaine Maxwell was not a peripheral figure but someone who exerted authority and awareness within that world. In reflecting on her testimony, Carolyn framed it as a way to counter years of minimization and denial, underscoring that the abuse Epstein carried out was enabled by a system that many people saw—and chose not to stop.<br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4683</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Annie Farmer And The Testimony That Exposed  Epstein's Infrastructure  (6/27/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-annie-farmer-and-the-testimony-that-exposed-epstein-s-infrastructure-6-27-26--72704591</link><description><![CDATA[Annie Farmer testified during Ghislaine Maxwell’s federal trial that she was just 16 years old when Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein flew her to Epstein’s ranch in New Mexico under the guise of an academic retreat. Farmer explained that she initially believed the trip was meant to provide her with educational and career opportunities. Instead, she said the experience quickly turned uncomfortable and exploitative. She recalled Maxwell giving her a massage during which Maxwell touched her breasts, an incident that left her feeling frozen and terrified. She also testified that Epstein had climbed into her bed unexpectedly and caressed her without consent. Farmer described feeling "panicked" and manipulated by two adults who had promised mentorship and safety.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72704591</guid><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2026 08:30:06 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72704591/megaanniefarmertestimonytellsusepsteinarchitecture.mp3" length="68242777" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/094ecf6e-b8f6-4922-b07f-6d60a89a116b/094ecf6e-b8f6-4922-b07f-6d60a89a116b.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/094ecf6e-b8f6-4922-b07f-6d60a89a116b/094ecf6e-b8f6-4922-b07f-6d60a89a116b.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/094ecf6e-b8f6-4922-b07f-6d60a89a116b/094ecf6e-b8f6-4922-b07f-6d60a89a116b.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Annie Farmer testified during Ghislaine Maxwell’s federal trial that she was just 16 years old when Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein flew her to Epstein’s ranch in New Mexico under the guise of an academic retreat. Farmer explained that she initially...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Annie Farmer testified during Ghislaine Maxwell’s federal trial that she was just 16 years old when Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein flew her to Epstein’s ranch in New Mexico under the guise of an academic retreat. Farmer explained that she initially believed the trip was meant to provide her with educational and career opportunities. Instead, she said the experience quickly turned uncomfortable and exploitative. She recalled Maxwell giving her a massage during which Maxwell touched her breasts, an incident that left her feeling frozen and terrified. She also testified that Epstein had climbed into her bed unexpectedly and caressed her without consent. Farmer described feeling "panicked" and manipulated by two adults who had promised mentorship and safety.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4266</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Jane Doe  And Her Testimony During The Ghislaine Maxwell Trial (6/26/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jane-doe-and-her-testimony-during-the-ghislaine-maxwell-trial-6-26-26--72704592</link><description><![CDATA[In her testimony at the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, “Jane Doe” described being recruited as a minor into Jeffrey Epstein’s world through what initially appeared to be benign social contact and promises of money. She testified that she was drawn in at a young age, gradually groomed, and made to believe the abuse was normal or expected. According to her account, Epstein’s homes functioned as controlled environments where rules were unspoken but rigid, and where fear, confusion, and dependence were deliberately cultivated. Jane Doe explained that she was repeatedly directed, pressured, and maneuvered into sexual encounters, often under circumstances that made refusal feel impossible, especially given her age and lack of power.<br /><br />Jane Doe’s testimony also emphasized the long-term psychological impact of the abuse and the power imbalance that made resistance or escape feel impossible at the time. She explained how fear, confusion, and manipulation kept her compliant, and how the trauma followed her well into adulthood. Crucially, her account aligned with those of other accusers, strengthening the prosecution’s argument that this was a coordinated system rather than a series of isolated acts. By the time Jane Doe testified, her words served not just as an individual story, but as part of a larger evidentiary mosaic showing that Ghislaine Maxwell knowingly participated in sustaining Epstein’s abuse network.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72704592</guid><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72704592/megajanetestimonymaxtrial.mp3" length="62880331" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/39dda881-5f27-4ca5-aed7-7f0bb5c1f5a8/39dda881-5f27-4ca5-aed7-7f0bb5c1f5a8.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/39dda881-5f27-4ca5-aed7-7f0bb5c1f5a8/39dda881-5f27-4ca5-aed7-7f0bb5c1f5a8.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/39dda881-5f27-4ca5-aed7-7f0bb5c1f5a8/39dda881-5f27-4ca5-aed7-7f0bb5c1f5a8.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In her testimony at the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, “Jane Doe” described being recruited as a minor into Jeffrey Epstein’s world through what initially appeared to be benign social contact and promises of money. She testified that she was drawn in at a...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In her testimony at the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, “Jane Doe” described being recruited as a minor into Jeffrey Epstein’s world through what initially appeared to be benign social contact and promises of money. She testified that she was drawn in at a young age, gradually groomed, and made to believe the abuse was normal or expected. According to her account, Epstein’s homes functioned as controlled environments where rules were unspoken but rigid, and where fear, confusion, and dependence were deliberately cultivated. Jane Doe explained that she was repeatedly directed, pressured, and maneuvered into sexual encounters, often under circumstances that made refusal feel impossible, especially given her age and lack of power.<br /><br />Jane Doe’s testimony also emphasized the long-term psychological impact of the abuse and the power imbalance that made resistance or escape feel impossible at the time. She explained how fear, confusion, and manipulation kept her compliant, and how the trauma followed her well into adulthood. Crucially, her account aligned with those of other accusers, strengthening the prosecution’s argument that this was a coordinated system rather than a series of isolated acts. By the time Jane Doe testified, her words served not just as an individual story, but as part of a larger evidentiary mosaic showing that Ghislaine Maxwell knowingly participated in sustaining Epstein’s abuse network.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3930</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Why Would Jeffrey Epstein Claim That Tartaglione Beat Him Up?</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/why-would-jeffrey-epstein-claim-that-tartaglione-beat-him-up--72652146</link><description><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein told his attorneys that his cellmate, former police officer Nicholas Tartaglione, had “roughed him up” during the July 23, 2019 incident in which Epstein was found injured and semiconscious on the floor of their cell at the Metropolitan Correctional Center. According to a source familiar with Epstein’s account, he blamed Tartaglione for the marks around his neck and maintained that the injuries were not the result of a suicide attempt. Epstein was placed on suicide watch after the incident, while authorities investigated whether he had attempted to take his own life or had been attacked by another inmate.<br /><br />Tartaglione’s attorney strongly denied that he had harmed Epstein, describing the two men’s relationship as cordial and saying Tartaglione had actually tried to help him. Tartaglione, who was awaiting trial for the killings of four men at the time, was later cleared of involvement by an internal investigation. The competing accounts left the July 23 incident unresolved in the public record, particularly because the relevant surveillance footage was later reported to have been erased after officials initially said it had been preserved.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72652146</guid><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2026 04:30:06 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72652146/epsteinfeartartaglione.mp3" length="15004360" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/bd51c471-aeb2-4760-ad2b-3424e2d22d68/bd51c471-aeb2-4760-ad2b-3424e2d22d68.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/bd51c471-aeb2-4760-ad2b-3424e2d22d68/bd51c471-aeb2-4760-ad2b-3424e2d22d68.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/bd51c471-aeb2-4760-ad2b-3424e2d22d68/bd51c471-aeb2-4760-ad2b-3424e2d22d68.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jeffrey Epstein told his attorneys that his cellmate, former police officer Nicholas Tartaglione, had “roughed him up” during the July 23, 2019 incident in which Epstein was found injured and semiconscious on the floor of their cell at the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein told his attorneys that his cellmate, former police officer Nicholas Tartaglione, had “roughed him up” during the July 23, 2019 incident in which Epstein was found injured and semiconscious on the floor of their cell at the Metropolitan Correctional Center. According to a source familiar with Epstein’s account, he blamed Tartaglione for the marks around his neck and maintained that the injuries were not the result of a suicide attempt. Epstein was placed on suicide watch after the incident, while authorities investigated whether he had attempted to take his own life or had been attacked by another inmate.<br /><br />Tartaglione’s attorney strongly denied that he had harmed Epstein, describing the two men’s relationship as cordial and saying Tartaglione had actually tried to help him. Tartaglione, who was awaiting trial for the killings of four men at the time, was later cleared of involvement by an internal investigation. The competing accounts left the July 23 incident unresolved in the public record, particularly because the relevant surveillance footage was later reported to have been erased after officials initially said it had been preserved.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>938</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Former Gov. John De Jongh And His Battle With Epstein  Survivors Over Jurisdiction</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/former-gov-john-de-jongh-and-his-battle-with-epstein-survivors-over-jurisdiction--72652145</link><description><![CDATA[In the case Does 1-6 vs. Gov. John de Jongh, Jr., et al., the defense counsel for Gov. John de Jongh, Jr. submitted a supplemental briefing in compliance with the court’s order to address topics discussed during a prior conference and highlight relevant cases or arguments raised by both parties. While primarily focusing on venue-related arguments, the defendant also joins and incorporates the arguments made by co-defendants in their respective submissions. The defense reiterates its position that the Second Amended Complaint (SAC) should be dismissed based on prior arguments made by the defendant and co-defendants.<br /><br />Should the SAC not be dismissed, including for reasons of improper venue, the defense asserts that the case should be transferred to the District of the Virgin Islands (D.V.I.), where it would be more appropriately handled.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.610915/gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.178.0.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.178.0.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72652145</guid><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2026 02:30:05 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72652145/dejonghjurisdictionletter.mp3" length="18971629" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b9d25173-6bcd-471b-8a61-b597e039ca32/b9d25173-6bcd-471b-8a61-b597e039ca32.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b9d25173-6bcd-471b-8a61-b597e039ca32/b9d25173-6bcd-471b-8a61-b597e039ca32.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b9d25173-6bcd-471b-8a61-b597e039ca32/b9d25173-6bcd-471b-8a61-b597e039ca32.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In the case Does 1-6 vs. Gov. John de Jongh, Jr., et al., the defense counsel for Gov. John de Jongh, Jr. submitted a supplemental briefing in compliance with the court’s order to address topics discussed during a prior conference and highlight...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In the case Does 1-6 vs. Gov. John de Jongh, Jr., et al., the defense counsel for Gov. John de Jongh, Jr. submitted a supplemental briefing in compliance with the court’s order to address topics discussed during a prior conference and highlight relevant cases or arguments raised by both parties. While primarily focusing on venue-related arguments, the defendant also joins and incorporates the arguments made by co-defendants in their respective submissions. The defense reiterates its position that the Second Amended Complaint (SAC) should be dismissed based on prior arguments made by the defendant and co-defendants.<br /><br />Should the SAC not be dismissed, including for reasons of improper venue, the defense asserts that the case should be transferred to the District of the Virgin Islands (D.V.I.), where it would be more appropriately handled.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.610915/gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.178.0.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.178.0.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1186</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Ghislaine Maxwell And Her Real Best Friend</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/ghislaine-maxwell-and-her-real-best-friend--72652144</link><description><![CDATA[Ghislaine Maxwell remained publicly loyal to Prince Andrew throughout the collapse of Jeffrey Epstein’s network and the scrutiny that followed. She helped facilitate Andrew’s access to Epstein’s social circle, hosted him at her London home and was present during key periods later examined by journalists, investigators and civil litigants. Even after Epstein’s 2008 conviction, Maxwell continued moving within overlapping social circles connected to Andrew, and she never publicly turned against him as allegations mounted. During her own legal troubles, she avoided offering any public account that would implicate Andrew or clarify disputed episodes involving him, Epstein and Virginia Giuffre.<br /><br /><br />That loyalty continued after Maxwell’s conviction. In interviews and statements from prison, she defended Andrew’s character, questioned the authenticity of the photograph showing him with Giuffre and Maxwell, and described him in sympathetic terms rather than distancing herself from him. She has never publicly accused Andrew of wrongdoing, never portrayed him as part of Epstein’s abuse operation and never provided the kind of detailed testimony that might have placed greater pressure on him. Whatever Maxwell may know about Andrew’s relationship with Epstein, her public position has remained consistent: protect the friendship, challenge the evidence against him and refuse to become a witness against him.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72652144</guid><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2026 00:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72652144/maxloyalandy.mp3" length="20220909" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9eb029a1-e4b4-425b-9813-4d64eb445ab1/9eb029a1-e4b4-425b-9813-4d64eb445ab1.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9eb029a1-e4b4-425b-9813-4d64eb445ab1/9eb029a1-e4b4-425b-9813-4d64eb445ab1.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9eb029a1-e4b4-425b-9813-4d64eb445ab1/9eb029a1-e4b4-425b-9813-4d64eb445ab1.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Ghislaine Maxwell remained publicly loyal to Prince Andrew throughout the collapse of Jeffrey Epstein’s network and the scrutiny that followed. She helped facilitate Andrew’s access to Epstein’s social circle, hosted him at her London home and was...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Ghislaine Maxwell remained publicly loyal to Prince Andrew throughout the collapse of Jeffrey Epstein’s network and the scrutiny that followed. She helped facilitate Andrew’s access to Epstein’s social circle, hosted him at her London home and was present during key periods later examined by journalists, investigators and civil litigants. Even after Epstein’s 2008 conviction, Maxwell continued moving within overlapping social circles connected to Andrew, and she never publicly turned against him as allegations mounted. During her own legal troubles, she avoided offering any public account that would implicate Andrew or clarify disputed episodes involving him, Epstein and Virginia Giuffre.<br /><br /><br />That loyalty continued after Maxwell’s conviction. In interviews and statements from prison, she defended Andrew’s character, questioned the authenticity of the photograph showing him with Giuffre and Maxwell, and described him in sympathetic terms rather than distancing herself from him. She has never publicly accused Andrew of wrongdoing, never portrayed him as part of Epstein’s abuse operation and never provided the kind of detailed testimony that might have placed greater pressure on him. Whatever Maxwell may know about Andrew’s relationship with Epstein, her public position has remained consistent: protect the friendship, challenge the evidence against him and refuse to become a witness against him.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1264</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Jeffrey Epstein's' Estate And The Allegations That They Stonewalled Survivors</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/jeffrey-epstein-s-estate-and-the-allegations-that-they-stonewalled-survivors--72652138</link><description><![CDATA[Survivors of Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse repeatedly voiced frustration that the administrators of his estate were dragging their feet when it came to compensating victims. Despite public promises that the estate would cooperate fully, survivors described a pattern of stonewalling—delays in processing claims, evasive responses to requests for documentation, and legal maneuvers that seemed designed to exhaust those seeking justice. Many said this obstruction only deepened their trauma, forcing them to relive the abuse while battling a system that appeared more interested in protecting Epstein’s fortune than making amends.<br /><br /><br />Lawyers representing survivors argued that the estate was hiding behind technicalities and secrecy to slow down or avoid payments altogether. Instead of transparency, the estate relied on a labyrinth of trust structures and offshore accounts that complicated efforts to track down Epstein’s assets. Survivors viewed this as a continuation of the very culture of protection and cover-up that allowed Epstein to operate for so long. For them, the stonewalling wasn’t just about money—it was about accountability, acknowledgment, and the recognition of the harm done, something they felt the estate was willfully denying them.<br /><br /><br />to contact  me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />Source:<br /><br />https://abcnews.go.com/US/victims-attorney-accuses-epstein-estate-attempts-stonewall-lawsuit/story?id=71830202<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72652138</guid><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 22:30:05 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72652138/anticsepsteinestate.mp3" length="24367900" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/78fa5192-3f3f-479e-910a-dc4885d6b761/78fa5192-3f3f-479e-910a-dc4885d6b761.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/78fa5192-3f3f-479e-910a-dc4885d6b761/78fa5192-3f3f-479e-910a-dc4885d6b761.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/78fa5192-3f3f-479e-910a-dc4885d6b761/78fa5192-3f3f-479e-910a-dc4885d6b761.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Survivors of Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse repeatedly voiced frustration that the administrators of his estate were dragging their feet when it came to compensating victims. Despite public promises that the estate would cooperate fully, survivors described...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Survivors of Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse repeatedly voiced frustration that the administrators of his estate were dragging their feet when it came to compensating victims. Despite public promises that the estate would cooperate fully, survivors described a pattern of stonewalling—delays in processing claims, evasive responses to requests for documentation, and legal maneuvers that seemed designed to exhaust those seeking justice. Many said this obstruction only deepened their trauma, forcing them to relive the abuse while battling a system that appeared more interested in protecting Epstein’s fortune than making amends.<br /><br /><br />Lawyers representing survivors argued that the estate was hiding behind technicalities and secrecy to slow down or avoid payments altogether. Instead of transparency, the estate relied on a labyrinth of trust structures and offshore accounts that complicated efforts to track down Epstein’s assets. Survivors viewed this as a continuation of the very culture of protection and cover-up that allowed Epstein to operate for so long. For them, the stonewalling wasn’t just about money—it was about accountability, acknowledgment, and the recognition of the harm done, something they felt the estate was willfully denying them.<br /><br /><br />to contact  me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />Source:<br /><br />https://abcnews.go.com/US/victims-attorney-accuses-epstein-estate-attempts-stonewall-lawsuit/story?id=71830202<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1523</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Tova Noel And The Transcript From Her Congressional Testimony (Part 11) (6/26/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/tova-noel-and-the-transcript-from-her-congressional-testimony-part-11-6-26-26--72693940</link><description><![CDATA[Tova Noel, one of the two correctional officers assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center’s Special Housing Unit on the night Jeffrey Epstein died, told the House Oversight Committee that she failed to conduct the required inmate checks and later signed records falsely indicating that the rounds had been completed. Noel described an understaffed, poorly managed facility in which she was exhausted, inadequately trained and assigned duties beyond her normal responsibilities. She maintained that she last saw Epstein alive during the evening medication round and observed nothing that made her believe he was preparing to harm himself. Noel also testified that Epstein received unusual accommodations, including extra bed linens, a CPAP machine and access to medication that appeared different from the treatment ordinarily given to other prisoners.<br /><br />Noel denied having any role in Epstein’s death, receiving money in connection with him or knowing anything about an alleged payment to facilitate access to his cell. She also rejected claims that she was the unidentified orange-colored figure seen moving toward Epstein’s tier at approximately 10:39 p.m., insisting that she never returned to the area and could not explain what—or who—the surveillance image showed. Although Noel said she believed Epstein died by suicide because he was supposedly alone inside the cell, her testimony did little to resolve the most important unanswered questions: why required checks were abandoned, why Epstein remained without a cellmate, who or what appeared near the tier, and how so many security procedures failed simultaneously. Instead, her account reinforced the picture of extraordinary negligence, special treatment and institutional dysfunction surrounding the death of the most consequential prisoner in federal custody.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72693940</guid><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 20:30:05 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72693940/tovanoelcongresstranscript11.mp3" length="11750130" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d10912f9-e832-4b93-b9b7-d4e897232d9a/d10912f9-e832-4b93-b9b7-d4e897232d9a.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d10912f9-e832-4b93-b9b7-d4e897232d9a/d10912f9-e832-4b93-b9b7-d4e897232d9a.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d10912f9-e832-4b93-b9b7-d4e897232d9a/d10912f9-e832-4b93-b9b7-d4e897232d9a.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Tova Noel, one of the two correctional officers assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center’s Special Housing Unit on the night Jeffrey Epstein died, told the House Oversight Committee that she failed to conduct the required inmate checks and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Tova Noel, one of the two correctional officers assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center’s Special Housing Unit on the night Jeffrey Epstein died, told the House Oversight Committee that she failed to conduct the required inmate checks and later signed records falsely indicating that the rounds had been completed. Noel described an understaffed, poorly managed facility in which she was exhausted, inadequately trained and assigned duties beyond her normal responsibilities. She maintained that she last saw Epstein alive during the evening medication round and observed nothing that made her believe he was preparing to harm himself. Noel also testified that Epstein received unusual accommodations, including extra bed linens, a CPAP machine and access to medication that appeared different from the treatment ordinarily given to other prisoners.<br /><br />Noel denied having any role in Epstein’s death, receiving money in connection with him or knowing anything about an alleged payment to facilitate access to his cell. She also rejected claims that she was the unidentified orange-colored figure seen moving toward Epstein’s tier at approximately 10:39 p.m., insisting that she never returned to the area and could not explain what—or who—the surveillance image showed. Although Noel said she believed Epstein died by suicide because he was supposedly alone inside the cell, her testimony did little to resolve the most important unanswered questions: why required checks were abandoned, why Epstein remained without a cellmate, who or what appeared near the tier, and how so many security procedures failed simultaneously. Instead, her account reinforced the picture of extraordinary negligence, special treatment and institutional dysfunction surrounding the death of the most consequential prisoner in federal custody.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>735</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Tova Noel And The Transcript From Her Congressional Testimony (Part 10) (6/26/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/tova-noel-and-the-transcript-from-her-congressional-testimony-part-10-6-26-26--72693939</link><description><![CDATA[Tova Noel, one of the two correctional officers assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center’s Special Housing Unit on the night Jeffrey Epstein died, told the House Oversight Committee that she failed to conduct the required inmate checks and later signed records falsely indicating that the rounds had been completed. Noel described an understaffed, poorly managed facility in which she was exhausted, inadequately trained and assigned duties beyond her normal responsibilities. She maintained that she last saw Epstein alive during the evening medication round and observed nothing that made her believe he was preparing to harm himself. Noel also testified that Epstein received unusual accommodations, including extra bed linens, a CPAP machine and access to medication that appeared different from the treatment ordinarily given to other prisoners.<br /><br />Noel denied having any role in Epstein’s death, receiving money in connection with him or knowing anything about an alleged payment to facilitate access to his cell. She also rejected claims that she was the unidentified orange-colored figure seen moving toward Epstein’s tier at approximately 10:39 p.m., insisting that she never returned to the area and could not explain what—or who—the surveillance image showed. Although Noel said she believed Epstein died by suicide because he was supposedly alone inside the cell, her testimony did little to resolve the most important unanswered questions: why required checks were abandoned, why Epstein remained without a cellmate, who or what appeared near the tier, and how so many security procedures failed simultaneously. Instead, her account reinforced the picture of extraordinary negligence, special treatment and institutional dysfunction surrounding the death of the most consequential prisoner in federal custody.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72693939</guid><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 18:30:08 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72693939/tovanoelcongresstranscript10.mp3" length="11694124" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/19e6d10e-b8d5-4eff-aae5-12287b57f20a/19e6d10e-b8d5-4eff-aae5-12287b57f20a.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/19e6d10e-b8d5-4eff-aae5-12287b57f20a/19e6d10e-b8d5-4eff-aae5-12287b57f20a.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/19e6d10e-b8d5-4eff-aae5-12287b57f20a/19e6d10e-b8d5-4eff-aae5-12287b57f20a.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Tova Noel, one of the two correctional officers assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center’s Special Housing Unit on the night Jeffrey Epstein died, told the House Oversight Committee that she failed to conduct the required inmate checks and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Tova Noel, one of the two correctional officers assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center’s Special Housing Unit on the night Jeffrey Epstein died, told the House Oversight Committee that she failed to conduct the required inmate checks and later signed records falsely indicating that the rounds had been completed. Noel described an understaffed, poorly managed facility in which she was exhausted, inadequately trained and assigned duties beyond her normal responsibilities. She maintained that she last saw Epstein alive during the evening medication round and observed nothing that made her believe he was preparing to harm himself. Noel also testified that Epstein received unusual accommodations, including extra bed linens, a CPAP machine and access to medication that appeared different from the treatment ordinarily given to other prisoners.<br /><br />Noel denied having any role in Epstein’s death, receiving money in connection with him or knowing anything about an alleged payment to facilitate access to his cell. She also rejected claims that she was the unidentified orange-colored figure seen moving toward Epstein’s tier at approximately 10:39 p.m., insisting that she never returned to the area and could not explain what—or who—the surveillance image showed. Although Noel said she believed Epstein died by suicide because he was supposedly alone inside the cell, her testimony did little to resolve the most important unanswered questions: why required checks were abandoned, why Epstein remained without a cellmate, who or what appeared near the tier, and how so many security procedures failed simultaneously. Instead, her account reinforced the picture of extraordinary negligence, special treatment and institutional dysfunction surrounding the death of the most consequential prisoner in federal custody.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>731</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Hidden Deals Protecting Epstein’s Powerful Friends (6/26/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-hidden-deals-protecting-epstein-s-powerful-friends-6-26-26--72693931</link><description><![CDATA[Some of Epstein’s accusers reportedly signed confidential pre-litigation settlements with powerful men in Epstein’s orbit whom they accused of misconduct, and those deals included NDAs that keep them from speaking publicly. Members of the House Oversight Committee have discussed using subpoenas to force testimony about those settlements, because voluntary interviews with Epstein associates are not under oath and witnesses can refuse to answer certain questions. The number of secret settlements is unknown, but one person cited direct knowledge of settlements involving four Epstein friends accused by more than 20 women combined.<br /><br />The broader issue is accountability: these private deals may have allowed wealthy or connected figures to avoid public lawsuits, discovery, sworn testimony, and scrutiny, even as Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell’s operation left a long trail of victims. Attorney Brad Edwards said Epstein “lent out” women and girls to powerful men, while also emphasizing that some victims chose confidentiality because they wanted to move on rather than endure more public trauma. The House committee could try to pierce those NDAs with subpoenas, but that would require political will — and many survivors may not want to be dragged back into the media circus.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2026/06/25/secret-settlements-jeffrey-epstein-friends-00975274" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The secret settlements protecting Jeffrey Epstein’s friends - POLITICO</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72693931</guid><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 16:30:05 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72693931/epsteinsettlementsunknownmen.mp3" length="29105049" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cde20d75-2b64-4864-9e15-35cff4c97a35/cde20d75-2b64-4864-9e15-35cff4c97a35.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cde20d75-2b64-4864-9e15-35cff4c97a35/cde20d75-2b64-4864-9e15-35cff4c97a35.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cde20d75-2b64-4864-9e15-35cff4c97a35/cde20d75-2b64-4864-9e15-35cff4c97a35.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Some of Epstein’s accusers reportedly signed confidential pre-litigation settlements with powerful men in Epstein’s orbit whom they accused of misconduct, and those deals included NDAs that keep them from speaking publicly. Members of the House...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Some of Epstein’s accusers reportedly signed confidential pre-litigation settlements with powerful men in Epstein’s orbit whom they accused of misconduct, and those deals included NDAs that keep them from speaking publicly. Members of the House Oversight Committee have discussed using subpoenas to force testimony about those settlements, because voluntary interviews with Epstein associates are not under oath and witnesses can refuse to answer certain questions. The number of secret settlements is unknown, but one person cited direct knowledge of settlements involving four Epstein friends accused by more than 20 women combined.<br /><br />The broader issue is accountability: these private deals may have allowed wealthy or connected figures to avoid public lawsuits, discovery, sworn testimony, and scrutiny, even as Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell’s operation left a long trail of victims. Attorney Brad Edwards said Epstein “lent out” women and girls to powerful men, while also emphasizing that some victims chose confidentiality because they wanted to move on rather than endure more public trauma. The House committee could try to pierce those NDAs with subpoenas, but that would require political will — and many survivors may not want to be dragged back into the media circus.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2026/06/25/secret-settlements-jeffrey-epstein-friends-00975274" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The secret settlements protecting Jeffrey Epstein’s friends - POLITICO</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1820</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Epstein Files Become Maxwell’s New Weapon (6/26/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-epstein-files-become-maxwell-s-new-weapon-6-26-26--72693934</link><description><![CDATA[Ghislaine Maxwell is trying to overturn her 20-year prison sentence by arguing that newly released Epstein files prove her conviction was unfair. In an amended habeas corpus petition filed in Manhattan federal court, Maxwell claims the documents show that her due process rights were violated before trial, including her argument that lawyers for Epstein’s accusers acted like “de facto prosecutors” and government agents. She is also reviving her long-running claim that Epstein’s 2007 non-prosecution agreement in Florida should have protected her from being prosecuted, even though courts have already rejected that argument.<br /><br />Federal prosecutors are pushing back hard, saying Maxwell’s latest claims are late, speculative, inaccurate, and do not prove that her trial was unfair. Maxwell also accuses prosecutors of failing to properly investigate witnesses and evidence, including by not interviewing Les Wexner, while claiming the newly released records show the government relied on misleading information. Judge Paul Engelmayer will review the petition, while Maxwell remains incarcerated at the minimum-security federal prison camp in Bryan, Texas, with a projected release date in July 2037.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/crime/ghislaine-maxwell-epstein-habeas-corpus-appeal-b3002770.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ghislaine Maxwell claims Epstein files prove her conviction was unfair as she fights to overturn 20-year sentence | The Independent</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72693934</guid><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 14:30:06 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72693934/maxwellnewhabeasappeal.mp3" length="15039051" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7fbeb162-307b-405e-854a-47e634f801ee/7fbeb162-307b-405e-854a-47e634f801ee.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7fbeb162-307b-405e-854a-47e634f801ee/7fbeb162-307b-405e-854a-47e634f801ee.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7fbeb162-307b-405e-854a-47e634f801ee/7fbeb162-307b-405e-854a-47e634f801ee.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Ghislaine Maxwell is trying to overturn her 20-year prison sentence by arguing that newly released Epstein files prove her conviction was unfair. In an amended habeas corpus petition filed in Manhattan federal court, Maxwell claims the documents show...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Ghislaine Maxwell is trying to overturn her 20-year prison sentence by arguing that newly released Epstein files prove her conviction was unfair. In an amended habeas corpus petition filed in Manhattan federal court, Maxwell claims the documents show that her due process rights were violated before trial, including her argument that lawyers for Epstein’s accusers acted like “de facto prosecutors” and government agents. She is also reviving her long-running claim that Epstein’s 2007 non-prosecution agreement in Florida should have protected her from being prosecuted, even though courts have already rejected that argument.<br /><br />Federal prosecutors are pushing back hard, saying Maxwell’s latest claims are late, speculative, inaccurate, and do not prove that her trial was unfair. Maxwell also accuses prosecutors of failing to properly investigate witnesses and evidence, including by not interviewing Les Wexner, while claiming the newly released records show the government relied on misleading information. Judge Paul Engelmayer will review the petition, while Maxwell remains incarcerated at the minimum-security federal prison camp in Bryan, Texas, with a projected release date in July 2037.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/crime/ghislaine-maxwell-epstein-habeas-corpus-appeal-b3002770.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ghislaine Maxwell claims Epstein files prove her conviction was unfair as she fights to overturn 20-year sentence | The Independent</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>940</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Lesley Groff and the Daily Machinery of Jeffrey Epstein’s Abuse (6/26/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/lesley-groff-and-the-daily-machinery-of-jeffrey-epstein-s-abuse-6-26-26--72693933</link><description><![CDATA[Lesley Groff, Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime executive assistant, told the House Oversight Committee in a closed-door interview that she booked massage appointments for Epstein “almost daily,” but denied knowingly arranging appointments with anyone she believed was underage. Groff said Epstein usually gave her names and phone numbers, that the calls were brief, and that massages were treated as a routine part of his schedule. Lawmakers pressed her hard on how she could work for Epstein for 18 years and not recognize what was happening, with Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi saying her explanation “strains credibility.” Groff maintained that nobody she spoke with sounded underage and that she was not “evaluating voices.”<br /><br />Groff also said Epstein manipulated her after his 2008 arrest by claiming he had been blackmailed and set up, and that she believed his explanation at the time because he could appear kind and generous. She said she now sees that as part of his manipulation, expressed sorrow for survivors, and said she believes them. The testimony matters because Groff was identified years ago as a potential co-conspirator but was never charged, and her account highlights one of the central unresolved questions in the Epstein case: how someone so close to the daily machinery of his life could claim not to understand that the endless “massage” appointments were part of the abuse pipeline.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72693933</guid><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 12:30:05 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72693933/groffgirlsdidntsoundunderage.mp3" length="16708380" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/540a399c-35e6-403d-80b4-93cee1ff0401/540a399c-35e6-403d-80b4-93cee1ff0401.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/540a399c-35e6-403d-80b4-93cee1ff0401/540a399c-35e6-403d-80b4-93cee1ff0401.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/540a399c-35e6-403d-80b4-93cee1ff0401/540a399c-35e6-403d-80b4-93cee1ff0401.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Lesley Groff, Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime executive assistant, told the House Oversight Committee in a closed-door interview that she booked massage appointments for Epstein “almost daily,” but denied knowingly arranging appointments with anyone she...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Lesley Groff, Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime executive assistant, told the House Oversight Committee in a closed-door interview that she booked massage appointments for Epstein “almost daily,” but denied knowingly arranging appointments with anyone she believed was underage. Groff said Epstein usually gave her names and phone numbers, that the calls were brief, and that massages were treated as a routine part of his schedule. Lawmakers pressed her hard on how she could work for Epstein for 18 years and not recognize what was happening, with Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi saying her explanation “strains credibility.” Groff maintained that nobody she spoke with sounded underage and that she was not “evaluating voices.”<br /><br />Groff also said Epstein manipulated her after his 2008 arrest by claiming he had been blackmailed and set up, and that she believed his explanation at the time because he could appear kind and generous. She said she now sees that as part of his manipulation, expressed sorrow for survivors, and said she believes them. The testimony matters because Groff was identified years ago as a potential co-conspirator but was never charged, and her account highlights one of the central unresolved questions in the Epstein case: how someone so close to the daily machinery of his life could claim not to understand that the endless “massage” appointments were part of the abuse pipeline.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1045</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Alex Acosta And His Epstein Interview With OIG Inspectors (Part 22-23) (6/26/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-alex-acosta-and-his-epstein-interview-with-oig-inspectors-part-22-23-6-26-26--72690453</link><description><![CDATA[In his interview with the DOJ Office of the Inspector General, Alex Acosta repeatedly framed the 2007–2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement as a constrained, pragmatic decision made under pressure rather than a deliberate act of favoritism. He told inspectors that Epstein’s defense team, stacked with politically connected and aggressive lawyers, created what he described as a credible threat of a federal indictment collapse if prosecutors pushed too hard. Acosta emphasized that his office believed securing some conviction at the state level was better than risking none at all, and he claimed he was focused on avoiding a scenario where Epstein walked entirely. Throughout the interview, Acosta leaned heavily on the idea that the deal was the product of risk assessment, limited evidence, and internal prosecutorial judgment rather than corruption or improper influence, repeatedly asserting that he acted in good faith.<br /><br /><br />At the same time, the OIG interview exposed glaring gaps and evasions in Acosta’s account, particularly regarding victims’ rights and transparency. He acknowledged that victims were not informed about the existence or finalization of the NPA, but attempted to downplay this as a procedural failure rather than a substantive violation of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act. Acosta also distanced himself from the unusual secrecy of the agreement, suggesting that others in his office handled victim communications and specific drafting decisions. Most damaging, however, was his inability to offer a coherent justification for why Epstein received terms so extraordinary that they effectively shut down federal accountability altogether. The interview left the unmistakable impression of a former U.S. Attorney attempting to launder an indefensible outcome through bureaucratic language, while avoiding responsibility for a deal that insulated Epstein and his network from meaningful scrutiny for more than a decade.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%207/EFTA00009229.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00009229.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72690453</guid><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 10:15:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72690453/megaacostaoig22n23.mp3" length="24570610" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c7a2f775-52f6-41ea-8f38-1bfda7e60d2c/c7a2f775-52f6-41ea-8f38-1bfda7e60d2c.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c7a2f775-52f6-41ea-8f38-1bfda7e60d2c/c7a2f775-52f6-41ea-8f38-1bfda7e60d2c.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c7a2f775-52f6-41ea-8f38-1bfda7e60d2c/c7a2f775-52f6-41ea-8f38-1bfda7e60d2c.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In his interview with the DOJ Office of the Inspector General, Alex Acosta repeatedly framed the 2007–2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement as a constrained, pragmatic decision made under pressure rather than a deliberate act of favoritism. He told...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In his interview with the DOJ Office of the Inspector General, Alex Acosta repeatedly framed the 2007–2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement as a constrained, pragmatic decision made under pressure rather than a deliberate act of favoritism. He told inspectors that Epstein’s defense team, stacked with politically connected and aggressive lawyers, created what he described as a credible threat of a federal indictment collapse if prosecutors pushed too hard. Acosta emphasized that his office believed securing some conviction at the state level was better than risking none at all, and he claimed he was focused on avoiding a scenario where Epstein walked entirely. Throughout the interview, Acosta leaned heavily on the idea that the deal was the product of risk assessment, limited evidence, and internal prosecutorial judgment rather than corruption or improper influence, repeatedly asserting that he acted in good faith.<br /><br /><br />At the same time, the OIG interview exposed glaring gaps and evasions in Acosta’s account, particularly regarding victims’ rights and transparency. He acknowledged that victims were not informed about the existence or finalization of the NPA, but attempted to downplay this as a procedural failure rather than a substantive violation of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act. Acosta also distanced himself from the unusual secrecy of the agreement, suggesting that others in his office handled victim communications and specific drafting decisions. Most damaging, however, was his inability to offer a coherent justification for why Epstein received terms so extraordinary that they effectively shut down federal accountability altogether. The interview left the unmistakable impression of a former U.S. Attorney attempting to launder an indefensible outcome through bureaucratic language, while avoiding responsibility for a deal that insulated Epstein and his network from meaningful scrutiny for more than a decade.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%207/EFTA00009229.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00009229.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1536</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Alex Acosta And His Epstein Interview With OIG Inspectors (Part 19-21) (6/25/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-alex-acosta-and-his-epstein-interview-with-oig-inspectors-part-19-21-6-25-26--72690454</link><description><![CDATA[In his interview with the DOJ Office of the Inspector General, Alex Acosta repeatedly framed the 2007–2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement as a constrained, pragmatic decision made under pressure rather than a deliberate act of favoritism. He told inspectors that Epstein’s defense team, stacked with politically connected and aggressive lawyers, created what he described as a credible threat of a federal indictment collapse if prosecutors pushed too hard. Acosta emphasized that his office believed securing some conviction at the state level was better than risking none at all, and he claimed he was focused on avoiding a scenario where Epstein walked entirely. Throughout the interview, Acosta leaned heavily on the idea that the deal was the product of risk assessment, limited evidence, and internal prosecutorial judgment rather than corruption or improper influence, repeatedly asserting that he acted in good faith.<br /><br /><br />At the same time, the OIG interview exposed glaring gaps and evasions in Acosta’s account, particularly regarding victims’ rights and transparency. He acknowledged that victims were not informed about the existence or finalization of the NPA, but attempted to downplay this as a procedural failure rather than a substantive violation of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act. Acosta also distanced himself from the unusual secrecy of the agreement, suggesting that others in his office handled victim communications and specific drafting decisions. Most damaging, however, was his inability to offer a coherent justification for why Epstein received terms so extraordinary that they effectively shut down federal accountability altogether. The interview left the unmistakable impression of a former U.S. Attorney attempting to launder an indefensible outcome through bureaucratic language, while avoiding responsibility for a deal that insulated Epstein and his network from meaningful scrutiny for more than a decade.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%207/EFTA00009229.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00009229.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72690454</guid><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 08:15:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72690454/megaacostaoig19n20n21.mp3" length="53696932" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f423ae08-98bb-4b6c-be42-e253f127508d/f423ae08-98bb-4b6c-be42-e253f127508d.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f423ae08-98bb-4b6c-be42-e253f127508d/f423ae08-98bb-4b6c-be42-e253f127508d.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f423ae08-98bb-4b6c-be42-e253f127508d/f423ae08-98bb-4b6c-be42-e253f127508d.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In his interview with the DOJ Office of the Inspector General, Alex Acosta repeatedly framed the 2007–2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement as a constrained, pragmatic decision made under pressure rather than a deliberate act of favoritism. He told...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In his interview with the DOJ Office of the Inspector General, Alex Acosta repeatedly framed the 2007–2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement as a constrained, pragmatic decision made under pressure rather than a deliberate act of favoritism. He told inspectors that Epstein’s defense team, stacked with politically connected and aggressive lawyers, created what he described as a credible threat of a federal indictment collapse if prosecutors pushed too hard. Acosta emphasized that his office believed securing some conviction at the state level was better than risking none at all, and he claimed he was focused on avoiding a scenario where Epstein walked entirely. Throughout the interview, Acosta leaned heavily on the idea that the deal was the product of risk assessment, limited evidence, and internal prosecutorial judgment rather than corruption or improper influence, repeatedly asserting that he acted in good faith.<br /><br /><br />At the same time, the OIG interview exposed glaring gaps and evasions in Acosta’s account, particularly regarding victims’ rights and transparency. He acknowledged that victims were not informed about the existence or finalization of the NPA, but attempted to downplay this as a procedural failure rather than a substantive violation of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act. Acosta also distanced himself from the unusual secrecy of the agreement, suggesting that others in his office handled victim communications and specific drafting decisions. Most damaging, however, was his inability to offer a coherent justification for why Epstein received terms so extraordinary that they effectively shut down federal accountability altogether. The interview left the unmistakable impression of a former U.S. Attorney attempting to launder an indefensible outcome through bureaucratic language, while avoiding responsibility for a deal that insulated Epstein and his network from meaningful scrutiny for more than a decade.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%207/EFTA00009229.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00009229.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3357</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Alex Acosta And His Epstein Interview With OIG Inspectors (Part 13-15) (6/25/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-alex-acosta-and-his-epstein-interview-with-oig-inspectors-part-13-15-6-25-26--72690452</link><description><![CDATA[In his interview with the DOJ Office of the Inspector General, Alex Acosta repeatedly framed the 2007–2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement as a constrained, pragmatic decision made under pressure rather than a deliberate act of favoritism. He told inspectors that Epstein’s defense team, stacked with politically connected and aggressive lawyers, created what he described as a credible threat of a federal indictment collapse if prosecutors pushed too hard. Acosta emphasized that his office believed securing some conviction at the state level was better than risking none at all, and he claimed he was focused on avoiding a scenario where Epstein walked entirely. Throughout the interview, Acosta leaned heavily on the idea that the deal was the product of risk assessment, limited evidence, and internal prosecutorial judgment rather than corruption or improper influence, repeatedly asserting that he acted in good faith.<br /><br /><br />At the same time, the OIG interview exposed glaring gaps and evasions in Acosta’s account, particularly regarding victims’ rights and transparency. He acknowledged that victims were not informed about the existence or finalization of the NPA, but attempted to downplay this as a procedural failure rather than a substantive violation of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act. Acosta also distanced himself from the unusual secrecy of the agreement, suggesting that others in his office handled victim communications and specific drafting decisions. Most damaging, however, was his inability to offer a coherent justification for why Epstein received terms so extraordinary that they effectively shut down federal accountability altogether. The interview left the unmistakable impression of a former U.S. Attorney attempting to launder an indefensible outcome through bureaucratic language, while avoiding responsibility for a deal that insulated Epstein and his network from meaningful scrutiny for more than a decade.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%207/EFTA00009229.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00009229.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72690452</guid><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 06:15:16 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72690452/megaacostaoig16n17n18.mp3" length="46028217" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0b27c1db-382d-441e-aa6c-f37bd141fbfa/0b27c1db-382d-441e-aa6c-f37bd141fbfa.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0b27c1db-382d-441e-aa6c-f37bd141fbfa/0b27c1db-382d-441e-aa6c-f37bd141fbfa.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0b27c1db-382d-441e-aa6c-f37bd141fbfa/0b27c1db-382d-441e-aa6c-f37bd141fbfa.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In his interview with the DOJ Office of the Inspector General, Alex Acosta repeatedly framed the 2007–2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement as a constrained, pragmatic decision made under pressure rather than a deliberate act of favoritism. He told...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In his interview with the DOJ Office of the Inspector General, Alex Acosta repeatedly framed the 2007–2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement as a constrained, pragmatic decision made under pressure rather than a deliberate act of favoritism. He told inspectors that Epstein’s defense team, stacked with politically connected and aggressive lawyers, created what he described as a credible threat of a federal indictment collapse if prosecutors pushed too hard. Acosta emphasized that his office believed securing some conviction at the state level was better than risking none at all, and he claimed he was focused on avoiding a scenario where Epstein walked entirely. Throughout the interview, Acosta leaned heavily on the idea that the deal was the product of risk assessment, limited evidence, and internal prosecutorial judgment rather than corruption or improper influence, repeatedly asserting that he acted in good faith.<br /><br /><br />At the same time, the OIG interview exposed glaring gaps and evasions in Acosta’s account, particularly regarding victims’ rights and transparency. He acknowledged that victims were not informed about the existence or finalization of the NPA, but attempted to downplay this as a procedural failure rather than a substantive violation of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act. Acosta also distanced himself from the unusual secrecy of the agreement, suggesting that others in his office handled victim communications and specific drafting decisions. Most damaging, however, was his inability to offer a coherent justification for why Epstein received terms so extraordinary that they effectively shut down federal accountability altogether. The interview left the unmistakable impression of a former U.S. Attorney attempting to launder an indefensible outcome through bureaucratic language, while avoiding responsibility for a deal that insulated Epstein and his network from meaningful scrutiny for more than a decade.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%207/EFTA00009229.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00009229.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2877</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Why Would Jeffrey Epstein Claim That Tartaglione Beat Him Up?</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/why-would-jeffrey-epstein-claim-that-tartaglione-beat-him-up--72652141</link><description><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein told his attorneys that his cellmate, former police officer Nicholas Tartaglione, had “roughed him up” during the July 23, 2019 incident in which Epstein was found injured and semiconscious on the floor of their cell at the Metropolitan Correctional Center. According to a source familiar with Epstein’s account, he blamed Tartaglione for the marks around his neck and maintained that the injuries were not the result of a suicide attempt. Epstein was placed on suicide watch after the incident, while authorities investigated whether he had attempted to take his own life or had been attacked by another inmate.<br /><br />Tartaglione’s attorney strongly denied that he had harmed Epstein, describing the two men’s relationship as cordial and saying Tartaglione had actually tried to help him. Tartaglione, who was awaiting trial for the killings of four men at the time, was later cleared of involvement by an internal investigation. The competing accounts left the July 23 incident unresolved in the public record, particularly because the relevant surveillance footage was later reported to have been erased after officials initially said it had been preserved.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72652141</guid><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 04:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72652141/tartaglionetimewithepstein.mp3" length="25590013" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5d7c5bf9-40e8-4173-adfe-5a6fad9fe992/5d7c5bf9-40e8-4173-adfe-5a6fad9fe992.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5d7c5bf9-40e8-4173-adfe-5a6fad9fe992/5d7c5bf9-40e8-4173-adfe-5a6fad9fe992.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5d7c5bf9-40e8-4173-adfe-5a6fad9fe992/5d7c5bf9-40e8-4173-adfe-5a6fad9fe992.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jeffrey Epstein told his attorneys that his cellmate, former police officer Nicholas Tartaglione, had “roughed him up” during the July 23, 2019 incident in which Epstein was found injured and semiconscious on the floor of their cell at the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein told his attorneys that his cellmate, former police officer Nicholas Tartaglione, had “roughed him up” during the July 23, 2019 incident in which Epstein was found injured and semiconscious on the floor of their cell at the Metropolitan Correctional Center. According to a source familiar with Epstein’s account, he blamed Tartaglione for the marks around his neck and maintained that the injuries were not the result of a suicide attempt. Epstein was placed on suicide watch after the incident, while authorities investigated whether he had attempted to take his own life or had been attacked by another inmate.<br /><br />Tartaglione’s attorney strongly denied that he had harmed Epstein, describing the two men’s relationship as cordial and saying Tartaglione had actually tried to help him. Tartaglione, who was awaiting trial for the killings of four men at the time, was later cleared of involvement by an internal investigation. The competing accounts left the July 23 incident unresolved in the public record, particularly because the relevant surveillance footage was later reported to have been erased after officials initially said it had been preserved.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1600</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Tartaglione’s Accusation: Did Maurene Comey Offer Epstein a Secret Bargain ?</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/tartaglione-s-accusation-did-maurene-comey-offer-epstein-a-secret-bargain--72652143</link><description><![CDATA[Tartaglione says that Maurene Comey — the federal prosecutor handling his case (and previously working in the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of New York) — pressured or promised Jeffrey Epstein some form of preferential treatment or freedom if Epstein would implicate Tartaglione or assist in his prosecution. In essence: Tartaglione is asserting that Comey extended an inducement to Epstein in order to flip him or extract testimony, which in his account entangles the prosecutor in ethically questionable dealings.<br /><br /><br />He also claims that Comey was intimately involved in suppressing or mis-handling key evidence that could have shown Tartaglione acted in a manner different from the official story—particularly regarding surveillance footage at the jail where Epstein and Tartaglione were cell-mates. In this version, Comey is cast not simply as a neutral prosecutor but as an actor in a cover-up: by failing to preserve or produce surveillance video (for example, outside Epstein’s cell on July 23, 2019) and by branding Tartaglione culpable, the claim goes, Comey effectively helped seal a pre-determined narrative against him rather than conduct a fair investigation.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72652143</guid><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 02:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72652143/tartaglionecomey.mp3" length="12532132" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/71ce9e45-833b-4972-a14d-fc2f231e3456/71ce9e45-833b-4972-a14d-fc2f231e3456.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/71ce9e45-833b-4972-a14d-fc2f231e3456/71ce9e45-833b-4972-a14d-fc2f231e3456.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/71ce9e45-833b-4972-a14d-fc2f231e3456/71ce9e45-833b-4972-a14d-fc2f231e3456.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Tartaglione says that Maurene Comey — the federal prosecutor handling his case (and previously working in the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of New York) — pressured or promised Jeffrey Epstein some form of preferential treatment or...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Tartaglione says that Maurene Comey — the federal prosecutor handling his case (and previously working in the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of New York) — pressured or promised Jeffrey Epstein some form of preferential treatment or freedom if Epstein would implicate Tartaglione or assist in his prosecution. In essence: Tartaglione is asserting that Comey extended an inducement to Epstein in order to flip him or extract testimony, which in his account entangles the prosecutor in ethically questionable dealings.<br /><br /><br />He also claims that Comey was intimately involved in suppressing or mis-handling key evidence that could have shown Tartaglione acted in a manner different from the official story—particularly regarding surveillance footage at the jail where Epstein and Tartaglione were cell-mates. In this version, Comey is cast not simply as a neutral prosecutor but as an actor in a cover-up: by failing to preserve or produce surveillance video (for example, outside Epstein’s cell on July 23, 2019) and by branding Tartaglione culpable, the claim goes, Comey effectively helped seal a pre-determined narrative against him rather than conduct a fair investigation.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>784</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>A Former Farmhand Of Nicholas Tartaglione Takes The Stand Against Him</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/a-former-farmhand-of-nicholas-tartaglione-takes-the-stand-against-him--72652147</link><description><![CDATA[A cooperating witness testified that Nicholas Tartaglione orchestrated the April 2016 abduction and killing of Martin Luna after accusing him of stealing money connected to their cocaine operation. According to the testimony, Luna was lured to the Likquid Lounge in Chester, New York, but arrived with his nephews, Miguel Luna and Urbano Santiago, and their friend Hector Gutierrez. Prosecutors said Tartaglione and his associates restrained the four men, and Tartaglione took Martin Luna into a bathroom, where he beat and interrogated him about the missing money before strangling him with a zip tie. The witness described the other three men as unintended victims who were seized simply because they had accompanied Luna to the bar.<br /><br />The testimony continued that Luna’s body and the three surviving captives were transported to Tartaglione’s property in Otisville. There, Miguel Luna, Urbano Santiago and Hector Gutierrez were shot and killed, and all four bodies were buried together on the property. The cooperator said he later helped dispose of the victims and eventually led investigators to the burial site after agreeing to assist the government. Prosecutors used his account alongside cellphone records, surveillance footage and forensic evidence to argue that Tartaglione directed the killings, while the defense attacked the witness’s credibility and maintained that cooperating defendants had incentives to blame Tartaglione in exchange for reduced punishment<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72652147</guid><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 00:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72652147/tartaglionefarmhand.mp3" length="12290551" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8b96ccc3-a955-4635-a91d-69b436d1d097/8b96ccc3-a955-4635-a91d-69b436d1d097.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8b96ccc3-a955-4635-a91d-69b436d1d097/8b96ccc3-a955-4635-a91d-69b436d1d097.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8b96ccc3-a955-4635-a91d-69b436d1d097/8b96ccc3-a955-4635-a91d-69b436d1d097.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A cooperating witness testified that Nicholas Tartaglione orchestrated the April 2016 abduction and killing of Martin Luna after accusing him of stealing money connected to their cocaine operation. According to the testimony, Luna was lured to the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A cooperating witness testified that Nicholas Tartaglione orchestrated the April 2016 abduction and killing of Martin Luna after accusing him of stealing money connected to their cocaine operation. According to the testimony, Luna was lured to the Likquid Lounge in Chester, New York, but arrived with his nephews, Miguel Luna and Urbano Santiago, and their friend Hector Gutierrez. Prosecutors said Tartaglione and his associates restrained the four men, and Tartaglione took Martin Luna into a bathroom, where he beat and interrogated him about the missing money before strangling him with a zip tie. The witness described the other three men as unintended victims who were seized simply because they had accompanied Luna to the bar.<br /><br />The testimony continued that Luna’s body and the three surviving captives were transported to Tartaglione’s property in Otisville. There, Miguel Luna, Urbano Santiago and Hector Gutierrez were shot and killed, and all four bodies were buried together on the property. The cooperator said he later helped dispose of the victims and eventually led investigators to the burial site after agreeing to assist the government. Prosecutors used his account alongside cellphone records, surveillance footage and forensic evidence to argue that Tartaglione directed the killings, while the defense attacked the witness’s credibility and maintained that cooperating defendants had incentives to blame Tartaglione in exchange for reduced punishment<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>769</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>For Jeffrey Epstein's Survivors The Pain Remained Even When The Abuse Stopped</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/for-jeffrey-epstein-s-survivors-the-pain-remained-even-when-the-abuse-stopped--72652139</link><description><![CDATA[Abuse can have profound and lasting effects on an individual, often leading to trauma later in life. Here is a summary of how abuse can lead to trauma:<br /><ol><li>Psychological Impact: Abuse erodes an individual's sense of safety, trust, and self-worth. This can lead to feelings of powerlessness, helplessness, and shame, which are at the core of traumatic experiences.</li><li>Complex Reactions: Victims of abuse often develop complex emotional and psychological reactions, such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), which is characterized by symptoms like flashbacks, nightmares, and hypervigilance. These reactions can persist long after the abuse has ended.</li><li>Changes in Brain Chemistry: Chronic stress and trauma can lead to changes in brain chemistry, affecting the brain's ability to regulate emotions and stress responses. This can result in heightened anxiety and an increased vulnerability to further traumatic experiences.</li><li>Interference with Development: Childhood abuse can interfere with healthy emotional and psychological development. It can disrupt the formation of secure attachments, which are crucial for a person's ability to form healthy relationships later in life.</li><li>Maladaptive Coping Mechanisms: Many survivors of abuse develop maladaptive coping mechanisms, such as substance abuse or self-harming behaviors, to numb emotional pain or regain a sense of control.</li><li>Revictimization: Individuals who have experienced abuse in the past may be at an increased risk of being revictimized in adulthood. They may find themselves in situations or relationships that echo their earlier traumatic experiences.</li><li>Impact on Self-Identity: Abuse can lead to a negative self-concept and a distorted view of oneself. Survivors may struggle with feelings of guilt, self-blame, and a persistent sense of being damaged or unworthy.</li><li>Physical Health Consequences: The stress and emotional toll of abuse can also have physical health consequences, leading to conditions like chronic pain, autoimmune disorders, and cardiovascular problems.</li><li>Difficulty with Trust and Intimacy: Survivors of abuse may find it challenging to trust others and establish intimate relationships due to their past experiences of betrayal and violation of boundaries.</li><li>Long-Term Psychological Symptoms: Trauma resulting from abuse can manifest as long-term symptoms, including depression, anxiety, substance abuse, and eating disorders, which can significantly impact an individual's quality of life.</li></ol><br /><br />In the case of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell and their decades of unchecked abuse, the number of surivvors who have suffered signifigant trauma is eye popping and brings up the glaring issue that survivors always seem to face: A lack of resources to help them in the aftermath. <br /><br /><br />(commercial at 6:51)<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://cbs12.com/news/local/jeffrey-epstein-victims-trauma-drug-usage-experts-on-the-lingering-trauma-of-sexual-abuse-victims-october-30-2023" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Trauma remains: Epstein abuse victim's tragic overdose shows enduring pain of survivors | WPEC (cbs12.com)</a><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72652139</guid><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 22:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72652139/epsteintrauma.mp3" length="10820588" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a8506fe0-581d-4187-a794-212b6ca7a41d/a8506fe0-581d-4187-a794-212b6ca7a41d.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a8506fe0-581d-4187-a794-212b6ca7a41d/a8506fe0-581d-4187-a794-212b6ca7a41d.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a8506fe0-581d-4187-a794-212b6ca7a41d/a8506fe0-581d-4187-a794-212b6ca7a41d.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Abuse can have profound and lasting effects on an individual, often leading to trauma later in life. Here is a summary of how abuse can lead to trauma:

- Psychological Impact: Abuse erodes an individual's sense of safety, trust, and self-worth. This...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Abuse can have profound and lasting effects on an individual, often leading to trauma later in life. Here is a summary of how abuse can lead to trauma:<br /><ol><li>Psychological Impact: Abuse erodes an individual's sense of safety, trust, and self-worth. This can lead to feelings of powerlessness, helplessness, and shame, which are at the core of traumatic experiences.</li><li>Complex Reactions: Victims of abuse often develop complex emotional and psychological reactions, such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), which is characterized by symptoms like flashbacks, nightmares, and hypervigilance. These reactions can persist long after the abuse has ended.</li><li>Changes in Brain Chemistry: Chronic stress and trauma can lead to changes in brain chemistry, affecting the brain's ability to regulate emotions and stress responses. This can result in heightened anxiety and an increased vulnerability to further traumatic experiences.</li><li>Interference with Development: Childhood abuse can interfere with healthy emotional and psychological development. It can disrupt the formation of secure attachments, which are crucial for a person's ability to form healthy relationships later in life.</li><li>Maladaptive Coping Mechanisms: Many survivors of abuse develop maladaptive coping mechanisms, such as substance abuse or self-harming behaviors, to numb emotional pain or regain a sense of control.</li><li>Revictimization: Individuals who have experienced abuse in the past may be at an increased risk of being revictimized in adulthood. They may find themselves in situations or relationships that echo their earlier traumatic experiences.</li><li>Impact on Self-Identity: Abuse can lead to a negative self-concept and a distorted view of oneself. Survivors may struggle with feelings of guilt, self-blame, and a persistent sense of being damaged or unworthy.</li><li>Physical Health Consequences: The stress and emotional toll of abuse can also have physical health consequences, leading to conditions like chronic pain, autoimmune disorders, and cardiovascular problems.</li><li>Difficulty with Trust and Intimacy: Survivors of abuse may find it challenging to trust others and establish intimate relationships due to their past experiences of betrayal and violation of boundaries.</li><li>Long-Term Psychological Symptoms: Trauma resulting from abuse can manifest as long-term symptoms, including depression, anxiety, substance abuse, and eating disorders, which can significantly impact an individual's quality of life.</li></ol><br /><br />In the case of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell and their decades of unchecked abuse, the number of surivvors who have suffered signifigant trauma is eye popping and brings up the glaring issue that survivors always seem to face: A lack of resources to help them in the aftermath. <br /><br /><br />(commercial at 6:51)<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://cbs12.com/news/local/jeffrey-epstein-victims-trauma-drug-usage-experts-on-the-lingering-trauma-of-sexual-abuse-victims-october-30-2023" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Trauma remains: Epstein abuse victim's tragic overdose shows enduring pain of survivors | WPEC (cbs12.com)</a><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>677</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Tova Noel And The Transcript From Her Congressional Testimony (Part 9) (6/25/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/tova-noel-and-the-transcript-from-her-congressional-testimony-part-9-6-25-26--72678482</link><description><![CDATA[Tova Noel, one of the two correctional officers assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center’s Special Housing Unit on the night Jeffrey Epstein died, told the House Oversight Committee that she failed to conduct the required inmate checks and later signed records falsely indicating that the rounds had been completed. Noel described an understaffed, poorly managed facility in which she was exhausted, inadequately trained and assigned duties beyond her normal responsibilities. She maintained that she last saw Epstein alive during the evening medication round and observed nothing that made her believe he was preparing to harm himself. Noel also testified that Epstein received unusual accommodations, including extra bed linens, a CPAP machine and access to medication that appeared different from the treatment ordinarily given to other prisoners.<br /><br />Noel denied having any role in Epstein’s death, receiving money in connection with him or knowing anything about an alleged payment to facilitate access to his cell. She also rejected claims that she was the unidentified orange-colored figure seen moving toward Epstein’s tier at approximately 10:39 p.m., insisting that she never returned to the area and could not explain what—or who—the surveillance image showed. Although Noel said she believed Epstein died by suicide because he was supposedly alone inside the cell, her testimony did little to resolve the most important unanswered questions: why required checks were abandoned, why Epstein remained without a cellmate, who or what appeared near the tier, and how so many security procedures failed simultaneously. Instead, her account reinforced the picture of extraordinary negligence, special treatment and institutional dysfunction surrounding the death of the most consequential prisoner in federal custody.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72678482</guid><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 20:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72678482/tovanoelcongresstranscript9.mp3" length="13742542" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6d753db5-1349-4716-b12e-5b82eb7fe28e/6d753db5-1349-4716-b12e-5b82eb7fe28e.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6d753db5-1349-4716-b12e-5b82eb7fe28e/6d753db5-1349-4716-b12e-5b82eb7fe28e.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6d753db5-1349-4716-b12e-5b82eb7fe28e/6d753db5-1349-4716-b12e-5b82eb7fe28e.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Tova Noel, one of the two correctional officers assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center’s Special Housing Unit on the night Jeffrey Epstein died, told the House Oversight Committee that she failed to conduct the required inmate checks and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Tova Noel, one of the two correctional officers assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center’s Special Housing Unit on the night Jeffrey Epstein died, told the House Oversight Committee that she failed to conduct the required inmate checks and later signed records falsely indicating that the rounds had been completed. Noel described an understaffed, poorly managed facility in which she was exhausted, inadequately trained and assigned duties beyond her normal responsibilities. She maintained that she last saw Epstein alive during the evening medication round and observed nothing that made her believe he was preparing to harm himself. Noel also testified that Epstein received unusual accommodations, including extra bed linens, a CPAP machine and access to medication that appeared different from the treatment ordinarily given to other prisoners.<br /><br />Noel denied having any role in Epstein’s death, receiving money in connection with him or knowing anything about an alleged payment to facilitate access to his cell. She also rejected claims that she was the unidentified orange-colored figure seen moving toward Epstein’s tier at approximately 10:39 p.m., insisting that she never returned to the area and could not explain what—or who—the surveillance image showed. Although Noel said she believed Epstein died by suicide because he was supposedly alone inside the cell, her testimony did little to resolve the most important unanswered questions: why required checks were abandoned, why Epstein remained without a cellmate, who or what appeared near the tier, and how so many security procedures failed simultaneously. Instead, her account reinforced the picture of extraordinary negligence, special treatment and institutional dysfunction surrounding the death of the most consequential prisoner in federal custody.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>859</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Tova Noel And The Transcript From Her Congressional Testimony (Part 8) (6/24/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/tova-noel-and-the-transcript-from-her-congressional-testimony-part-8-6-24-26--72678486</link><description><![CDATA[Tova Noel, one of the two correctional officers assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center’s Special Housing Unit on the night Jeffrey Epstein died, told the House Oversight Committee that she failed to conduct the required inmate checks and later signed records falsely indicating that the rounds had been completed. Noel described an understaffed, poorly managed facility in which she was exhausted, inadequately trained and assigned duties beyond her normal responsibilities. She maintained that she last saw Epstein alive during the evening medication round and observed nothing that made her believe he was preparing to harm himself. Noel also testified that Epstein received unusual accommodations, including extra bed linens, a CPAP machine and access to medication that appeared different from the treatment ordinarily given to other prisoners.<br /><br />Noel denied having any role in Epstein’s death, receiving money in connection with him or knowing anything about an alleged payment to facilitate access to his cell. She also rejected claims that she was the unidentified orange-colored figure seen moving toward Epstein’s tier at approximately 10:39 p.m., insisting that she never returned to the area and could not explain what—or who—the surveillance image showed. Although Noel said she believed Epstein died by suicide because he was supposedly alone inside the cell, her testimony did little to resolve the most important unanswered questions: why required checks were abandoned, why Epstein remained without a cellmate, who or what appeared near the tier, and how so many security procedures failed simultaneously. Instead, her account reinforced the picture of extraordinary negligence, special treatment and institutional dysfunction surrounding the death of the most consequential prisoner in federal custody.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72678486</guid><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 18:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72678486/tovanoelcongresstranscripts8.mp3" length="12927103" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f879c750-beaf-43d5-b7bc-aaceec4e5f40/f879c750-beaf-43d5-b7bc-aaceec4e5f40.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f879c750-beaf-43d5-b7bc-aaceec4e5f40/f879c750-beaf-43d5-b7bc-aaceec4e5f40.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f879c750-beaf-43d5-b7bc-aaceec4e5f40/f879c750-beaf-43d5-b7bc-aaceec4e5f40.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Tova Noel, one of the two correctional officers assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center’s Special Housing Unit on the night Jeffrey Epstein died, told the House Oversight Committee that she failed to conduct the required inmate checks and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Tova Noel, one of the two correctional officers assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center’s Special Housing Unit on the night Jeffrey Epstein died, told the House Oversight Committee that she failed to conduct the required inmate checks and later signed records falsely indicating that the rounds had been completed. Noel described an understaffed, poorly managed facility in which she was exhausted, inadequately trained and assigned duties beyond her normal responsibilities. She maintained that she last saw Epstein alive during the evening medication round and observed nothing that made her believe he was preparing to harm himself. Noel also testified that Epstein received unusual accommodations, including extra bed linens, a CPAP machine and access to medication that appeared different from the treatment ordinarily given to other prisoners.<br /><br />Noel denied having any role in Epstein’s death, receiving money in connection with him or knowing anything about an alleged payment to facilitate access to his cell. She also rejected claims that she was the unidentified orange-colored figure seen moving toward Epstein’s tier at approximately 10:39 p.m., insisting that she never returned to the area and could not explain what—or who—the surveillance image showed. Although Noel said she believed Epstein died by suicide because he was supposedly alone inside the cell, her testimony did little to resolve the most important unanswered questions: why required checks were abandoned, why Epstein remained without a cellmate, who or what appeared near the tier, and how so many security procedures failed simultaneously. Instead, her account reinforced the picture of extraordinary negligence, special treatment and institutional dysfunction surrounding the death of the most consequential prisoner in federal custody.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>808</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Great Epstein Runaround: Hearings, Transcripts, and Institutional Fog (6/25/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-great-epstein-runaround-hearings-transcripts-and-institutional-fog-6-25-26--72678476</link><description><![CDATA[<br /><br />The congressional oversight committee handling the Epstein investigation is a toothless operation built to create the appearance of action while keeping the coverup intact. Instead of forcing witnesses into sworn, public, high-pressure testimony where lies and evasions carry real consequences, the committee has relied on closed-door sessions, voluntary testimony, delayed transcripts, and soft procedures that let people dodge, forget, spin, and hide behind lawyers. That makes the testimony nearly worthless, because if witnesses do not fear being held accountable, they have every reason to give half-truths, claim amnesia, and protect themselves and the institutions around them.<br /><br />James Comer is allowing the process to function as a wall, not an investigation. The whole operation was supposed to drain the Epstein story of momentum and bury it under procedure, but the discharge petition disrupted that plan and forced the committee to look busy. So instead of pursuing real accountability, Comer and the committee keep cutting corners, controlling the process, and feeding the public another round of political theater. The result is more secrecy, more delay, more circular testimony, and more protection for the powerful, while survivors and citizens are once again handed process instead of truth.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72678476</guid><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 16:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72678476/congressionalepsteincomitteeisafarce.mp3" length="17466140" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/efafe9fd-8fb0-4284-90fe-e702f4cba4a3/efafe9fd-8fb0-4284-90fe-e702f4cba4a3.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/efafe9fd-8fb0-4284-90fe-e702f4cba4a3/efafe9fd-8fb0-4284-90fe-e702f4cba4a3.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/efafe9fd-8fb0-4284-90fe-e702f4cba4a3/efafe9fd-8fb0-4284-90fe-e702f4cba4a3.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The congressional oversight committee handling the Epstein investigation is a toothless operation built to create the appearance of action while keeping the coverup intact. Instead of forcing witnesses into sworn, public, high-pressure testimony where...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br /><br />The congressional oversight committee handling the Epstein investigation is a toothless operation built to create the appearance of action while keeping the coverup intact. Instead of forcing witnesses into sworn, public, high-pressure testimony where lies and evasions carry real consequences, the committee has relied on closed-door sessions, voluntary testimony, delayed transcripts, and soft procedures that let people dodge, forget, spin, and hide behind lawyers. That makes the testimony nearly worthless, because if witnesses do not fear being held accountable, they have every reason to give half-truths, claim amnesia, and protect themselves and the institutions around them.<br /><br />James Comer is allowing the process to function as a wall, not an investigation. The whole operation was supposed to drain the Epstein story of momentum and bury it under procedure, but the discharge petition disrupted that plan and forced the committee to look busy. So instead of pursuing real accountability, Comer and the committee keep cutting corners, controlling the process, and feeding the public another round of political theater. The result is more secrecy, more delay, more circular testimony, and more protection for the powerful, while survivors and citizens are once again handed process instead of truth.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1092</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Western Australia Police Review The Circumstances Leading To Virginia Robert's Death (6/25/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/western-australia-police-review-the-circumstances-leading-to-virginia-robert-s-death-6-25-26--72678472</link><description><![CDATA[Western Australian police have agreed to review how officers handled their interactions with Virginia Giuffre before her death by suicide in April 2025. Giuffre’s brother, Sky Roberts, and sister-in-law, Amanda Roberts, wrote to both police and the state coroner asking for scrutiny of the response to a domestic violence dispute involving Giuffre and a former partner. Police commissioner Col Blanch confirmed during a parliamentary hearing that the family’s letter had been received and that a review was underway, while saying he did not yet know the details of the police response and wanted the review to establish what happened.<br /><br />The family says they are not challenging the official circumstances of Giuffre’s death, but they want answers about whether police failed to properly follow up after she reportedly went to a police station more than once. Amanda Roberts questioned where those reports are and why further action did not appear to continue, while Sky Roberts framed the push as part of a broader demand to examine systemic failures around domestic and family violence. Family violence experts and advocates have also backed the request for an inquest, arguing that Giuffre’s case could expose wider failures in how authorities respond to victims before tragedy strikes<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/24/western-australian-police-to-review-response-to-virginia-giuffre-domestic-violence-dispute-ntwnfb" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Western Australian police to review response to Virginia Giuffre domestic violence dispute | Jeffrey Epstein | The Guardian</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72678472</guid><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 14:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72678472/australiavirginiainvestigation.mp3" length="12406744" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/732f9cf9-a920-4cb1-a43e-85c0b45927d3/732f9cf9-a920-4cb1-a43e-85c0b45927d3.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/732f9cf9-a920-4cb1-a43e-85c0b45927d3/732f9cf9-a920-4cb1-a43e-85c0b45927d3.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/732f9cf9-a920-4cb1-a43e-85c0b45927d3/732f9cf9-a920-4cb1-a43e-85c0b45927d3.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Western Australian police have agreed to review how officers handled their interactions with Virginia Giuffre before her death by suicide in April 2025. Giuffre’s brother, Sky Roberts, and sister-in-law, Amanda Roberts, wrote to both police and the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Western Australian police have agreed to review how officers handled their interactions with Virginia Giuffre before her death by suicide in April 2025. Giuffre’s brother, Sky Roberts, and sister-in-law, Amanda Roberts, wrote to both police and the state coroner asking for scrutiny of the response to a domestic violence dispute involving Giuffre and a former partner. Police commissioner Col Blanch confirmed during a parliamentary hearing that the family’s letter had been received and that a review was underway, while saying he did not yet know the details of the police response and wanted the review to establish what happened.<br /><br />The family says they are not challenging the official circumstances of Giuffre’s death, but they want answers about whether police failed to properly follow up after she reportedly went to a police station more than once. Amanda Roberts questioned where those reports are and why further action did not appear to continue, while Sky Roberts framed the push as part of a broader demand to examine systemic failures around domestic and family violence. Family violence experts and advocates have also backed the request for an inquest, arguing that Giuffre’s case could expose wider failures in how authorities respond to victims before tragedy strikes<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/24/western-australian-police-to-review-response-to-virginia-giuffre-domestic-violence-dispute-ntwnfb" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Western Australian police to review response to Virginia Giuffre domestic violence dispute | Jeffrey Epstein | The Guardian</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>776</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Congressional Oversight Committee Releases The Epstein Related Bill Gates Transcript (6/25/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-congressional-oversight-committee-releases-the-epstein-related-bill-gates-transcript-6-25-26--72678473</link><description><![CDATA[Bill Gates told the House Oversight Committee that his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein was, in his telling, about philanthropy — Epstein claimed he could connect Gates to wealthy donors who might put major money into global health work. Gates said he met Epstein beginning in 2011, after Epstein’s 2008 conviction, and continued interactions until 2014, when he concluded Epstein could not deliver on those promises. He denied witnessing Epstein commit crimes, denied visiting Epstein’s island, ranch, or Florida home, and said he “never victimized anyone,” while acknowledging that he may have been in the presence of Epstein victims during his dealings with Epstein.<br /><br />The more damaging part is that Gates admitted Epstein gained access to sensitive information about his personal life, including extramarital affairs, and allegedly tried to use that information — mixed with falsehoods, according to Gates — to pressure him back into contact. Gates portrayed Epstein as a manipulator who used proximity to powerful people to launder his reputation, while lawmakers pressed the obvious question: why Gates kept engaging with a convicted sex offender at all. Gates expressed regret, saying he should never have met with Epstein, but the testimony still adds another example of Epstein’s method: insinuating himself into elite circles, collecting leverage, and using access as currency.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/23/politics/bill-gates-epstein-deposition" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bill Gates says he didn’t witness crimes but may have been in presence of Epstein victims | CNN Politics</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72678473</guid><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 12:18:25 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72678473/gatestranscriptreleased.mp3" length="16990502" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c16957f7-d7a0-4942-a3c6-265201b2f48f/c16957f7-d7a0-4942-a3c6-265201b2f48f.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c16957f7-d7a0-4942-a3c6-265201b2f48f/c16957f7-d7a0-4942-a3c6-265201b2f48f.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c16957f7-d7a0-4942-a3c6-265201b2f48f/c16957f7-d7a0-4942-a3c6-265201b2f48f.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Bill Gates told the House Oversight Committee that his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein was, in his telling, about philanthropy — Epstein claimed he could connect Gates to wealthy donors who might put major money into global health work. Gates said...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Bill Gates told the House Oversight Committee that his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein was, in his telling, about philanthropy — Epstein claimed he could connect Gates to wealthy donors who might put major money into global health work. Gates said he met Epstein beginning in 2011, after Epstein’s 2008 conviction, and continued interactions until 2014, when he concluded Epstein could not deliver on those promises. He denied witnessing Epstein commit crimes, denied visiting Epstein’s island, ranch, or Florida home, and said he “never victimized anyone,” while acknowledging that he may have been in the presence of Epstein victims during his dealings with Epstein.<br /><br />The more damaging part is that Gates admitted Epstein gained access to sensitive information about his personal life, including extramarital affairs, and allegedly tried to use that information — mixed with falsehoods, according to Gates — to pressure him back into contact. Gates portrayed Epstein as a manipulator who used proximity to powerful people to launder his reputation, while lawmakers pressed the obvious question: why Gates kept engaging with a convicted sex offender at all. Gates expressed regret, saying he should never have met with Epstein, but the testimony still adds another example of Epstein’s method: insinuating himself into elite circles, collecting leverage, and using access as currency.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/23/politics/bill-gates-epstein-deposition" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bill Gates says he didn’t witness crimes but may have been in presence of Epstein victims | CNN Politics</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1062</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  David Boies And His Battle Against Jeffrey Epstein (6/25/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-david-boies-and-his-battle-against-jeffrey-epstein-6-25-26--72675545</link><description><![CDATA[David Boies is one of the most powerful and controversial attorneys in modern American legal history, best known for representing Al Gore in Bush v. Gore and for building a reputation as a ruthless, high-stakes litigator for corporate and elite clients. Over decades, Boies cultivated an image as a champion of civil rights and complex litigation while simultaneously representing multinational corporations, Hollywood studios, and billionaires accused of serious misconduct. That dual role—public crusader on one hand, elite fixer on the other—has defined his career and ultimately made his involvement in the Epstein saga so damaging to his legacy. By the time Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes came under renewed scrutiny, Boies was no longer just a famous lawyer; he was a legal power broker whose choices carried enormous ethical weight.<br /><br />Boies entered the Epstein story as part of the legal team representing Epstein’s victims, but his role quickly became controversial when it was revealed that his firm was also working in ways that appeared to protect Epstein’s interests and manage reputational fallout for powerful figures connected to the case. Most notably, Boies’s firm hired the private intelligence company Black Cube—staffed by former Israeli intelligence operatives—to dig up damaging information on Epstein accusers, a move that shocked observers and survivors alike. This tactic blurred the line between victim advocacy and intimidation, reinforcing long-standing concerns that the legal system was being weaponized to suppress accountability rather than pursue it. In the Epstein saga, David Boies came to symbolize a deeper problem: how elite legal muscle can be used to shape outcomes, silence vulnerable people, and protect powerful networks, even while claiming to stand on the side of justice.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72675545</guid><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 10:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72675545/megadavidboiesinterview.mp3" length="34349183" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/20bcdcad-cf0b-45e7-8331-d13b326e26b2/20bcdcad-cf0b-45e7-8331-d13b326e26b2.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/20bcdcad-cf0b-45e7-8331-d13b326e26b2/20bcdcad-cf0b-45e7-8331-d13b326e26b2.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/20bcdcad-cf0b-45e7-8331-d13b326e26b2/20bcdcad-cf0b-45e7-8331-d13b326e26b2.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>David Boies is one of the most powerful and controversial attorneys in modern American legal history, best known for representing Al Gore in Bush v. Gore and for building a reputation as a ruthless, high-stakes litigator for corporate and elite...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[David Boies is one of the most powerful and controversial attorneys in modern American legal history, best known for representing Al Gore in Bush v. Gore and for building a reputation as a ruthless, high-stakes litigator for corporate and elite clients. Over decades, Boies cultivated an image as a champion of civil rights and complex litigation while simultaneously representing multinational corporations, Hollywood studios, and billionaires accused of serious misconduct. That dual role—public crusader on one hand, elite fixer on the other—has defined his career and ultimately made his involvement in the Epstein saga so damaging to his legacy. By the time Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes came under renewed scrutiny, Boies was no longer just a famous lawyer; he was a legal power broker whose choices carried enormous ethical weight.<br /><br />Boies entered the Epstein story as part of the legal team representing Epstein’s victims, but his role quickly became controversial when it was revealed that his firm was also working in ways that appeared to protect Epstein’s interests and manage reputational fallout for powerful figures connected to the case. Most notably, Boies’s firm hired the private intelligence company Black Cube—staffed by former Israeli intelligence operatives—to dig up damaging information on Epstein accusers, a move that shocked observers and survivors alike. This tactic blurred the line between victim advocacy and intimidation, reinforcing long-standing concerns that the legal system was being weaponized to suppress accountability rather than pursue it. In the Epstein saga, David Boies came to symbolize a deeper problem: how elite legal muscle can be used to shape outcomes, silence vulnerable people, and protect powerful networks, even while claiming to stand on the side of justice.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2147</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition: The Reasons Why Epstein Chose  New  Mexico  Have Become Crystal Clear (6/25/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-reasons-why-epstein-chose-new-mexico-have-become-crystal-clear-6-25-26--72675544</link><description><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein’s decision to establish Zorro Ranch in New Mexico was not accidental or aesthetic—it was strategic. The property’s extreme isolation, its proximity to multiple jurisdictions, and New Mexico’s historically fragmented law-enforcement oversight made it an ideal location for secrecy and control. Epstein also cultivated relationships with influential figures in the state’s political, academic, and business circles, embedding himself in elite networks that discouraged scrutiny rather than invited it. Zorro Ranch functioned as a private kingdom: remote enough to keep victims isolated, expansive enough to avoid neighbors, and embedded in a state where Epstein’s presence was normalized through philanthropy, social access, and institutional silence. For someone obsessed with insulation from consequences, New Mexico offered distance, discretion, and deference.<br /><br />That calculation paid off. Despite multiple allegations from victims who said they were trafficked to or abused at Zorro Ranch, there was never a full criminal investigation into Epstein’s conduct in New Mexico while he was alive. No coordinated state or federal probe, no grand jury, no sustained law-enforcement effort that matched the seriousness of the claims. Allegations surfaced, witnesses spoke, and yet the machinery of justice never meaningfully engaged. The absence of an investigation cannot be explained by lack of information alone; it reflects a broader pattern seen throughout the Epstein case, where geography, influence, and institutional reluctance combined to shield him. In New Mexico, as elsewhere, Epstein exploited legal gray zones and elite protection to operate without consequence—leaving behind unanswered questions, unexamined allegations, and a glaring example of how power can neutralize accountability before it ever begins.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72675544</guid><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 08:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72675544/megaepsteinnewmexicoforareason.mp3" length="41718639" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0f44c8b5-ec51-458c-b2be-f429aaf6043b/0f44c8b5-ec51-458c-b2be-f429aaf6043b.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0f44c8b5-ec51-458c-b2be-f429aaf6043b/0f44c8b5-ec51-458c-b2be-f429aaf6043b.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0f44c8b5-ec51-458c-b2be-f429aaf6043b/0f44c8b5-ec51-458c-b2be-f429aaf6043b.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jeffrey Epstein’s decision to establish Zorro Ranch in New Mexico was not accidental or aesthetic—it was strategic. The property’s extreme isolation, its proximity to multiple jurisdictions, and New Mexico’s historically fragmented law-enforcement...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein’s decision to establish Zorro Ranch in New Mexico was not accidental or aesthetic—it was strategic. The property’s extreme isolation, its proximity to multiple jurisdictions, and New Mexico’s historically fragmented law-enforcement oversight made it an ideal location for secrecy and control. Epstein also cultivated relationships with influential figures in the state’s political, academic, and business circles, embedding himself in elite networks that discouraged scrutiny rather than invited it. Zorro Ranch functioned as a private kingdom: remote enough to keep victims isolated, expansive enough to avoid neighbors, and embedded in a state where Epstein’s presence was normalized through philanthropy, social access, and institutional silence. For someone obsessed with insulation from consequences, New Mexico offered distance, discretion, and deference.<br /><br />That calculation paid off. Despite multiple allegations from victims who said they were trafficked to or abused at Zorro Ranch, there was never a full criminal investigation into Epstein’s conduct in New Mexico while he was alive. No coordinated state or federal probe, no grand jury, no sustained law-enforcement effort that matched the seriousness of the claims. Allegations surfaced, witnesses spoke, and yet the machinery of justice never meaningfully engaged. The absence of an investigation cannot be explained by lack of information alone; it reflects a broader pattern seen throughout the Epstein case, where geography, influence, and institutional reluctance combined to shield him. In New Mexico, as elsewhere, Epstein exploited legal gray zones and elite protection to operate without consequence—leaving behind unanswered questions, unexamined allegations, and a glaring example of how power can neutralize accountability before it ever begins.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2608</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Jeffrey Epstein And The Unexplained Vanishing Video  (6/24/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-the-unexplained-vanishing-video-6-24-26--72675543</link><description><![CDATA[Continuing with the conversation about conspiracy theories, we dive into the situation surrounding the "lost video" of Jeffrey Epstein's first alleged suicide attempt and ask a few simple questions that nobody in the legacy media or in a position of authority have any interest in answering.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><a href="https://protonmail.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">bobbycapucci@protonmail.com</a><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.foxbusiness.com/technology/epsteins-alleged-suicide-attempt-video-no-longer-exists" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">https://www.foxbusiness.com/technology/epsteins-alleged-suicide-attempt-video-no-longer-exists</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72675543</guid><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 06:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72675543/megaeptsteinvanishingjailvideo.mp3" length="30161650" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2a9c4c4d-4261-4163-a718-a2eace8becde/2a9c4c4d-4261-4163-a718-a2eace8becde.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2a9c4c4d-4261-4163-a718-a2eace8becde/2a9c4c4d-4261-4163-a718-a2eace8becde.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2a9c4c4d-4261-4163-a718-a2eace8becde/2a9c4c4d-4261-4163-a718-a2eace8becde.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Continuing with the conversation about conspiracy theories, we dive into the situation surrounding the "lost video" of Jeffrey Epstein's first alleged suicide attempt and ask a few simple questions that nobody in the legacy media or in a position of...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Continuing with the conversation about conspiracy theories, we dive into the situation surrounding the "lost video" of Jeffrey Epstein's first alleged suicide attempt and ask a few simple questions that nobody in the legacy media or in a position of authority have any interest in answering.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><a href="https://protonmail.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">bobbycapucci@protonmail.com</a><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.foxbusiness.com/technology/epsteins-alleged-suicide-attempt-video-no-longer-exists" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">https://www.foxbusiness.com/technology/epsteins-alleged-suicide-attempt-video-no-longer-exists</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1886</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Five Years After  Epstein's Death And Survivors Still Seek Justice</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/five-years-after-epstein-s-death-and-survivors-still-seek-justice--72652150</link><description><![CDATA[Five years after Jeffrey Epstein's death, survivors of his sexual abuse are still seeking justice through various avenues. Despite the establishment of a victims' compensation fund, which began accepting claims in 2021 and offers a confidential forum for monetary compensation, many survivors feel that true justice has yet to be achieved.<br /><br />Several survivors, represented by law firms such as Merson Law, are demanding accountability from institutions that failed to act on numerous allegations and tips about Epstein's activities. This includes the FBI, which is currently facing lawsuits for negligence in handling Epstein's case. Critics argue that the FBI has shown a lack of urgency in addressing the survivors' claims, in stark contrast to its actions in other high-profile sexual abuse cases, such as those involving Larry Nassar​.<br /><br />Moreover, Epstein's influence and manipulation of the justice system allowed him to evade significant punishment during his lifetime, further complicating the survivors' quest for justice. Epstein's 2008 plea deal, which resulted in a minimal sentence, and the subsequent lack of notification to his victims about the deal, highlight systemic failures that survivors are now trying to address through legislative reforms like the Courtney Wild Crime Victims' Rights Reform Act.<br /><br />The struggle for justice continues as survivors push for greater recognition of their suffering, legal accountability for those who enabled Epstein's crimes, and systemic changes to prevent such failures in the future.<br /><br />(commercial at 13:26)<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://abcnews.go.com/US/5-years-after-jeffrey-epsteins-arrest-push-accountability/story?id=111718135" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">5 years after Jeffrey Epstein's arrest, push for accountability continues - ABC News (go.com)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72652150</guid><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 04:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72652150/epsteinnojustice.mp3" length="21491505" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7a8a8078-809f-445b-b9c7-076fc1436e40/7a8a8078-809f-445b-b9c7-076fc1436e40.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7a8a8078-809f-445b-b9c7-076fc1436e40/7a8a8078-809f-445b-b9c7-076fc1436e40.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7a8a8078-809f-445b-b9c7-076fc1436e40/7a8a8078-809f-445b-b9c7-076fc1436e40.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Five years after Jeffrey Epstein's death, survivors of his sexual abuse are still seeking justice through various avenues. Despite the establishment of a victims' compensation fund, which began accepting claims in 2021 and offers a confidential forum...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Five years after Jeffrey Epstein's death, survivors of his sexual abuse are still seeking justice through various avenues. Despite the establishment of a victims' compensation fund, which began accepting claims in 2021 and offers a confidential forum for monetary compensation, many survivors feel that true justice has yet to be achieved.<br /><br />Several survivors, represented by law firms such as Merson Law, are demanding accountability from institutions that failed to act on numerous allegations and tips about Epstein's activities. This includes the FBI, which is currently facing lawsuits for negligence in handling Epstein's case. Critics argue that the FBI has shown a lack of urgency in addressing the survivors' claims, in stark contrast to its actions in other high-profile sexual abuse cases, such as those involving Larry Nassar​.<br /><br />Moreover, Epstein's influence and manipulation of the justice system allowed him to evade significant punishment during his lifetime, further complicating the survivors' quest for justice. Epstein's 2008 plea deal, which resulted in a minimal sentence, and the subsequent lack of notification to his victims about the deal, highlight systemic failures that survivors are now trying to address through legislative reforms like the Courtney Wild Crime Victims' Rights Reform Act.<br /><br />The struggle for justice continues as survivors push for greater recognition of their suffering, legal accountability for those who enabled Epstein's crimes, and systemic changes to prevent such failures in the future.<br /><br />(commercial at 13:26)<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://abcnews.go.com/US/5-years-after-jeffrey-epsteins-arrest-push-accountability/story?id=111718135" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">5 years after Jeffrey Epstein's arrest, push for accountability continues - ABC News (go.com)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1344</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>billgates,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epstein,epsteinisland,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,ghislainemaxwellupdates,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinnews,jeffreyepsteinnewsupdates,maxwellnewsupdates,news,newsupdate,princeandrew,princeandrewnews,theyallknew,truecrime,truecrimenewsreport</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Ghislaine Maxwell And Her Time At FCI Tallahassee</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/ghislaine-maxwell-and-her-time-at-fci-tallahassee--72652151</link><description><![CDATA[After arriving at FCI Tallahassee in July 2022, Ghislaine Maxwell was initially kept apart from the prison’s general population while officials completed the intake, classification and security-review process associated with her transfer from the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn. The separation was widely described as solitary confinement or restrictive housing, although the Bureau of Prisons did not publicly provide a detailed account of her precise status or the conditions under which she was held. Maxwell had already spent much of her pretrial detention under unusually intensive monitoring, including periods of suicide watch, constant observation and repeated searches, and her attorneys had repeatedly complained that she was being isolated more severely than other prisoners.<br /><br />Maxwell was subsequently released into the general population at Tallahassee, allowing her to live and interact with other incarcerated women under the facility’s ordinary low-security arrangements. The move gave her access to communal housing, prison work assignments, educational and recreational programs, meals with other prisoners, email and commissary privileges. It marked a substantial change from the isolation and close surveillance she had experienced in Brooklyn and during the initial period following her arrival in Florida. Maxwell remained at FCI Tallahassee until August 1, 2025, when she was transferred to the still less restrictive minimum-security Federal Prison Camp in Bryan, Texas.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72652151</guid><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 02:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72652151/maxservetimeflorida.mp3" length="20866238" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a10b9aa9-8151-4da4-a190-808020fcb620/a10b9aa9-8151-4da4-a190-808020fcb620.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a10b9aa9-8151-4da4-a190-808020fcb620/a10b9aa9-8151-4da4-a190-808020fcb620.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a10b9aa9-8151-4da4-a190-808020fcb620/a10b9aa9-8151-4da4-a190-808020fcb620.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>After arriving at FCI Tallahassee in July 2022, Ghislaine Maxwell was initially kept apart from the prison’s general population while officials completed the intake, classification and security-review process associated with her transfer from the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[After arriving at FCI Tallahassee in July 2022, Ghislaine Maxwell was initially kept apart from the prison’s general population while officials completed the intake, classification and security-review process associated with her transfer from the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn. The separation was widely described as solitary confinement or restrictive housing, although the Bureau of Prisons did not publicly provide a detailed account of her precise status or the conditions under which she was held. Maxwell had already spent much of her pretrial detention under unusually intensive monitoring, including periods of suicide watch, constant observation and repeated searches, and her attorneys had repeatedly complained that she was being isolated more severely than other prisoners.<br /><br />Maxwell was subsequently released into the general population at Tallahassee, allowing her to live and interact with other incarcerated women under the facility’s ordinary low-security arrangements. The move gave her access to communal housing, prison work assignments, educational and recreational programs, meals with other prisoners, email and commissary privileges. It marked a substantial change from the isolation and close surveillance she had experienced in Brooklyn and during the initial period following her arrival in Florida. Maxwell remained at FCI Tallahassee until August 1, 2025, when she was transferred to the still less restrictive minimum-security Federal Prison Camp in Bryan, Texas.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1305</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>billgates,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epstein,epsteinisland,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,ghislainemaxwellupdates,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinnews,jeffreyepsteinnewsupdates,maxwellnewsupdates,news,newsupdate,princeandrew,princeandrewnews,theyallknew,truecrime,truecrimenewsreport</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Ghislaine Maxwell And Her Move To The Mainline In Tallahassee Update</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/ghislaine-maxwell-and-her-move-to-the-mainline-in-tallahassee-update--72652153</link><description><![CDATA[After arriving at FCI Tallahassee in July 2022, Ghislaine Maxwell was initially kept apart from the prison’s general population while officials completed the intake, classification and security-review process associated with her transfer from the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn. The separation was widely described as solitary confinement or restrictive housing, although the Bureau of Prisons did not publicly provide a detailed account of her precise status or the conditions under which she was held. Maxwell had already spent much of her pretrial detention under unusually intensive monitoring, including periods of suicide watch, constant observation and repeated searches, and her attorneys had repeatedly complained that she was being isolated more severely than other prisoners.<br /><br />Maxwell was subsequently released into the general population at Tallahassee, allowing her to live and interact with other incarcerated women under the facility’s ordinary low-security arrangements. The move gave her access to communal housing, prison work assignments, educational and recreational programs, meals with other prisoners, email and commissary privileges. It marked a substantial change from the isolation and close surveillance she had experienced in Brooklyn and during the initial period following her arrival in Florida. Maxwell remained at FCI Tallahassee until August 1, 2025, when she was transferred to the still less restrictive minimum-security Federal Prison Camp in Bryan, Texas.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72652153</guid><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 00:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72652153/maxmainline.mp3" length="14125392" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7fe7df8f-8b7f-4306-8645-94ab408f4c5e/7fe7df8f-8b7f-4306-8645-94ab408f4c5e.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7fe7df8f-8b7f-4306-8645-94ab408f4c5e/7fe7df8f-8b7f-4306-8645-94ab408f4c5e.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7fe7df8f-8b7f-4306-8645-94ab408f4c5e/7fe7df8f-8b7f-4306-8645-94ab408f4c5e.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>After arriving at FCI Tallahassee in July 2022, Ghislaine Maxwell was initially kept apart from the prison’s general population while officials completed the intake, classification and security-review process associated with her transfer from the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[After arriving at FCI Tallahassee in July 2022, Ghislaine Maxwell was initially kept apart from the prison’s general population while officials completed the intake, classification and security-review process associated with her transfer from the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn. The separation was widely described as solitary confinement or restrictive housing, although the Bureau of Prisons did not publicly provide a detailed account of her precise status or the conditions under which she was held. Maxwell had already spent much of her pretrial detention under unusually intensive monitoring, including periods of suicide watch, constant observation and repeated searches, and her attorneys had repeatedly complained that she was being isolated more severely than other prisoners.<br /><br />Maxwell was subsequently released into the general population at Tallahassee, allowing her to live and interact with other incarcerated women under the facility’s ordinary low-security arrangements. The move gave her access to communal housing, prison work assignments, educational and recreational programs, meals with other prisoners, email and commissary privileges. It marked a substantial change from the isolation and close surveillance she had experienced in Brooklyn and during the initial period following her arrival in Florida. Maxwell remained at FCI Tallahassee until August 1, 2025, when she was transferred to the still less restrictive minimum-security Federal Prison Camp in Bryan, Texas.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>883</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>billgates,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epstein,epsteinisland,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,ghislainemaxwellupdates,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinnews,jeffreyepsteinnewsupdates,maxwellnewsupdates,news,newsupdate,princeandrew,princeandrewnews,theyallknew,truecrime,truecrimenewsreport</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Prince Andrew  And The Funeral Of Prince Philip</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/prince-andrew-and-the-funeral-of-prince-philip--72652149</link><description><![CDATA[The nickname “nonce” became associated with Prince Andrew following the exposure of his deep ties to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and the allegations made by Virginia Giuffre that he had sexual contact with her when she was underage. In British slang, “nonce” is a highly derogatory term for someone accused of child sexual abuse, and the label stuck after Andrew’s disastrous 2019 BBC Newsnight interview, where his denials — including the infamous “I don’t sweat” line — made him a public laughingstock. The term spread rapidly through social media, satire, and even pop culture, culminating in the release of the punk song Prince Andrew Is a Sweaty Nonce, which mocked both his scandal and his implausible defenses. The nickname became shorthand for his fall from grace and a reflection of the public’s disgust toward his alleged conduct and lack of accountability.<br /><br />When Prince Philip died in April 2021, Andrew maneuvered his way into the funeral despite being stripped of royal duties and public standing. Attendance was strictly limited to thirty people due to COVID restrictions, but Andrew, as Philip’s son, was included as a matter of protocol — a decision that sparked backlash among both the public and palace insiders. Reports suggested Andrew was eager to use the event as a soft return to royal life, positioning himself visibly in the procession and trying to rehabilitate his image through sympathy optics. While the palace maintained his inclusion was a family matter, critics viewed it as a calculated move by Andrew to reinsert himself into royal proceedings after the Epstein scandal had effectively exiled him from public life.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72652149</guid><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 22:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72652149/andydeathprincephilip.mp3" length="16356070" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e39af3d9-08d5-42ec-908f-3b642bded77b/e39af3d9-08d5-42ec-908f-3b642bded77b.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e39af3d9-08d5-42ec-908f-3b642bded77b/e39af3d9-08d5-42ec-908f-3b642bded77b.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e39af3d9-08d5-42ec-908f-3b642bded77b/e39af3d9-08d5-42ec-908f-3b642bded77b.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The nickname “nonce” became associated with Prince Andrew following the exposure of his deep ties to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and the allegations made by Virginia Giuffre that he had sexual contact with her when she was underage. In...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The nickname “nonce” became associated with Prince Andrew following the exposure of his deep ties to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and the allegations made by Virginia Giuffre that he had sexual contact with her when she was underage. In British slang, “nonce” is a highly derogatory term for someone accused of child sexual abuse, and the label stuck after Andrew’s disastrous 2019 BBC Newsnight interview, where his denials — including the infamous “I don’t sweat” line — made him a public laughingstock. The term spread rapidly through social media, satire, and even pop culture, culminating in the release of the punk song Prince Andrew Is a Sweaty Nonce, which mocked both his scandal and his implausible defenses. The nickname became shorthand for his fall from grace and a reflection of the public’s disgust toward his alleged conduct and lack of accountability.<br /><br />When Prince Philip died in April 2021, Andrew maneuvered his way into the funeral despite being stripped of royal duties and public standing. Attendance was strictly limited to thirty people due to COVID restrictions, but Andrew, as Philip’s son, was included as a matter of protocol — a decision that sparked backlash among both the public and palace insiders. Reports suggested Andrew was eager to use the event as a soft return to royal life, positioning himself visibly in the procession and trying to rehabilitate his image through sympathy optics. While the palace maintained his inclusion was a family matter, critics viewed it as a calculated move by Andrew to reinsert himself into royal proceedings after the Epstein scandal had effectively exiled him from public life.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1023</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>billgates,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epstein,epsteinisland,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,ghislainemaxwellupdates,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinnews,jeffreyepsteinnewsupdates,maxwellnewsupdates,news,newsupdate,princeandrew,princeandrewnews,theyallknew,truecrime,truecrimenewsreport</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Tova Noel And The Transcript From Her Congressional Testimony (Part 7) (6/24/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/tova-noel-and-the-transcript-from-her-congressional-testimony-part-7-6-24-26--72657940</link><description><![CDATA[Tova Noel, one of the two correctional officers assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center’s Special Housing Unit on the night Jeffrey Epstein died, told the House Oversight Committee that she failed to conduct the required inmate checks and later signed records falsely indicating that the rounds had been completed. Noel described an understaffed, poorly managed facility in which she was exhausted, inadequately trained and assigned duties beyond her normal responsibilities. She maintained that she last saw Epstein alive during the evening medication round and observed nothing that made her believe he was preparing to harm himself. Noel also testified that Epstein received unusual accommodations, including extra bed linens, a CPAP machine and access to medication that appeared different from the treatment ordinarily given to other prisoners.<br /><br />Noel denied having any role in Epstein’s death, receiving money in connection with him or knowing anything about an alleged payment to facilitate access to his cell. She also rejected claims that she was the unidentified orange-colored figure seen moving toward Epstein’s tier at approximately 10:39 p.m., insisting that she never returned to the area and could not explain what—or who—the surveillance image showed. Although Noel said she believed Epstein died by suicide because he was supposedly alone inside the cell, her testimony did little to resolve the most important unanswered questions: why required checks were abandoned, why Epstein remained without a cellmate, who or what appeared near the tier, and how so many security procedures failed simultaneously. Instead, her account reinforced the picture of extraordinary negligence, special treatment and institutional dysfunction surrounding the death of the most consequential prisoner in federal custody.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72657940</guid><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 20:15:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72657940/tovanoelcongresstranscript7.mp3" length="12979348" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2913a6c1-9446-4185-b60d-1b200faabdc9/2913a6c1-9446-4185-b60d-1b200faabdc9.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2913a6c1-9446-4185-b60d-1b200faabdc9/2913a6c1-9446-4185-b60d-1b200faabdc9.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2913a6c1-9446-4185-b60d-1b200faabdc9/2913a6c1-9446-4185-b60d-1b200faabdc9.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Tova Noel, one of the two correctional officers assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center’s Special Housing Unit on the night Jeffrey Epstein died, told the House Oversight Committee that she failed to conduct the required inmate checks and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Tova Noel, one of the two correctional officers assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center’s Special Housing Unit on the night Jeffrey Epstein died, told the House Oversight Committee that she failed to conduct the required inmate checks and later signed records falsely indicating that the rounds had been completed. Noel described an understaffed, poorly managed facility in which she was exhausted, inadequately trained and assigned duties beyond her normal responsibilities. She maintained that she last saw Epstein alive during the evening medication round and observed nothing that made her believe he was preparing to harm himself. Noel also testified that Epstein received unusual accommodations, including extra bed linens, a CPAP machine and access to medication that appeared different from the treatment ordinarily given to other prisoners.<br /><br />Noel denied having any role in Epstein’s death, receiving money in connection with him or knowing anything about an alleged payment to facilitate access to his cell. She also rejected claims that she was the unidentified orange-colored figure seen moving toward Epstein’s tier at approximately 10:39 p.m., insisting that she never returned to the area and could not explain what—or who—the surveillance image showed. Although Noel said she believed Epstein died by suicide because he was supposedly alone inside the cell, her testimony did little to resolve the most important unanswered questions: why required checks were abandoned, why Epstein remained without a cellmate, who or what appeared near the tier, and how so many security procedures failed simultaneously. Instead, her account reinforced the picture of extraordinary negligence, special treatment and institutional dysfunction surrounding the death of the most consequential prisoner in federal custody.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>812</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The UK Inquiry Into Grooming Gangs:  Sally And Marlon Tell Their Stories (6/24/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-uk-inquiry-into-grooming-gangs-sally-and-marlon-tell-their-stories-6-24-26--72657938</link><description><![CDATA[Rupert Lowe’s inquiry says it received evidence from survivors, relatives, whistleblowers, professionals and political figures about organised child sexual exploitation in communities across the United Kingdom. The report describes a recurring pattern in which vulnerable girls were targeted with attention, gifts, alcohol and drugs before being subjected to sexual violence, intimidation and trafficking between offenders and locations. It states that the victims discussed in the evidence were predominantly white British girls and that many of the alleged perpetrators were men of Pakistani Muslim heritage. The inquiry says the abuse was allowed to continue because police forces, social services, schools, healthcare providers, licensing authorities and government bodies repeatedly failed to identify victims, share information, investigate allegations properly or intervene when clear warning signs appeared.<br /><br />The report calls for mandatory reporting of suspected child sexual exploitation, improved collection of demographic information about victims and offenders, specialist police units and a consistent national system for sharing safeguarding intelligence. It also recommends regular training for police officers, teachers, medical staff and social workers; automatic referrals when children present with injuries, pregnancies, sexually transmitted infections, self-harm or other indicators of exploitation; and long-term medical, psychological, housing and legal support for survivors. Additional recommendations include reviewing convictions imposed on children who committed offences while being exploited, stronger sentencing, deportation proceedings against convicted foreign nationals where legally applicable, and legal action against perpetrators or officials believed to have escaped accountability.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://static1.squarespace.com/static/6810978a41bbc42489eafa81/t/6a314bb1151e511944bd4421/1781615537601/The+Rape+Gang+Inquiry+Report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Rape Gang Inquiry Report.docx</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72657938</guid><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 18:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72657938/ukgrooming5_sallymarlon.mp3" length="13626349" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4eecb771-062d-4ef8-aa2c-80c565b1fbfd/4eecb771-062d-4ef8-aa2c-80c565b1fbfd.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4eecb771-062d-4ef8-aa2c-80c565b1fbfd/4eecb771-062d-4ef8-aa2c-80c565b1fbfd.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4eecb771-062d-4ef8-aa2c-80c565b1fbfd/4eecb771-062d-4ef8-aa2c-80c565b1fbfd.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Rupert Lowe’s inquiry says it received evidence from survivors, relatives, whistleblowers, professionals and political figures about organised child sexual exploitation in communities across the United Kingdom. The report describes a recurring pattern...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Rupert Lowe’s inquiry says it received evidence from survivors, relatives, whistleblowers, professionals and political figures about organised child sexual exploitation in communities across the United Kingdom. The report describes a recurring pattern in which vulnerable girls were targeted with attention, gifts, alcohol and drugs before being subjected to sexual violence, intimidation and trafficking between offenders and locations. It states that the victims discussed in the evidence were predominantly white British girls and that many of the alleged perpetrators were men of Pakistani Muslim heritage. The inquiry says the abuse was allowed to continue because police forces, social services, schools, healthcare providers, licensing authorities and government bodies repeatedly failed to identify victims, share information, investigate allegations properly or intervene when clear warning signs appeared.<br /><br />The report calls for mandatory reporting of suspected child sexual exploitation, improved collection of demographic information about victims and offenders, specialist police units and a consistent national system for sharing safeguarding intelligence. It also recommends regular training for police officers, teachers, medical staff and social workers; automatic referrals when children present with injuries, pregnancies, sexually transmitted infections, self-harm or other indicators of exploitation; and long-term medical, psychological, housing and legal support for survivors. Additional recommendations include reviewing convictions imposed on children who committed offences while being exploited, stronger sentencing, deportation proceedings against convicted foreign nationals where legally applicable, and legal action against perpetrators or officials believed to have escaped accountability.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://static1.squarespace.com/static/6810978a41bbc42489eafa81/t/6a314bb1151e511944bd4421/1781615537601/The+Rape+Gang+Inquiry+Report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Rape Gang Inquiry Report.docx</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>852</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Wexner Dismisses Congress, but the Epstein Questions Remain (6/24/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/wexner-dismisses-congress-but-the-epstein-questions-remain-6-24-26--72657939</link><description><![CDATA[Les Wexner framed his nearly six-hour congressional deposition about Jeffrey Epstein as a political stunt, calling it “silly,” “a nothing burger,” and accusing House Democrats of using the session for “airtime” rather than serious oversight. He claimed he had “nothing to hide,” repeated that he knew nothing about Epstein’s criminal conduct, and cast himself as another person deceived by Epstein — financially wounded, personally embarrassed, but not responsible. That posture is convenient, but it also dodges the central problem: Wexner was not some casual acquaintance. He was one of Epstein’s most powerful patrons and most prominent clients, and the idea that he could hand Epstein extraordinary access, trust, and legitimacy while remaining completely unaware of the warning signs is exactly why lawmakers and the public remain skeptical.<br /><br />Wexner also attacked Democrats for leaving the room, holding press events, and asking questions he believed were designed for campaign material, including one about his donations to Ohio Sen. Jon Husted. But that criticism works only if you accept Wexner’s premise that his role has already been fully explained, and it has not. His complaints about optics do not erase the deeper issue: Epstein’s access to elite institutions depended on men like Wexner giving him credibility, wealth, and proximity to power. Wexner may want the deposition to be “one and done,” but his insistence that there was nothing meaningful to ask sounds less like closure and more like an attempt to reduce years of unresolved questions into an annoyance he believes he has outgrown.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2026/6/19/wexner-says-deposition-silly/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Wexner Calls Congressional Epstein Deposition ‘Silly,’ Says Democrats Used It as ‘Photo Op’ | News | The Harvard Crimson</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72657939</guid><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 16:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72657939/wexnerrunshisyap.mp3" length="16996772" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6f061cab-0416-41f3-84a4-cec5797b36af/6f061cab-0416-41f3-84a4-cec5797b36af.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6f061cab-0416-41f3-84a4-cec5797b36af/6f061cab-0416-41f3-84a4-cec5797b36af.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6f061cab-0416-41f3-84a4-cec5797b36af/6f061cab-0416-41f3-84a4-cec5797b36af.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Les Wexner framed his nearly six-hour congressional deposition about Jeffrey Epstein as a political stunt, calling it “silly,” “a nothing burger,” and accusing House Democrats of using the session for “airtime” rather than serious oversight. He...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Les Wexner framed his nearly six-hour congressional deposition about Jeffrey Epstein as a political stunt, calling it “silly,” “a nothing burger,” and accusing House Democrats of using the session for “airtime” rather than serious oversight. He claimed he had “nothing to hide,” repeated that he knew nothing about Epstein’s criminal conduct, and cast himself as another person deceived by Epstein — financially wounded, personally embarrassed, but not responsible. That posture is convenient, but it also dodges the central problem: Wexner was not some casual acquaintance. He was one of Epstein’s most powerful patrons and most prominent clients, and the idea that he could hand Epstein extraordinary access, trust, and legitimacy while remaining completely unaware of the warning signs is exactly why lawmakers and the public remain skeptical.<br /><br />Wexner also attacked Democrats for leaving the room, holding press events, and asking questions he believed were designed for campaign material, including one about his donations to Ohio Sen. Jon Husted. But that criticism works only if you accept Wexner’s premise that his role has already been fully explained, and it has not. His complaints about optics do not erase the deeper issue: Epstein’s access to elite institutions depended on men like Wexner giving him credibility, wealth, and proximity to power. Wexner may want the deposition to be “one and done,” but his insistence that there was nothing meaningful to ask sounds less like closure and more like an attempt to reduce years of unresolved questions into an annoyance he believes he has outgrown.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2026/6/19/wexner-says-deposition-silly/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Wexner Calls Congressional Epstein Deposition ‘Silly,’ Says Democrats Used It as ‘Photo Op’ | News | The Harvard Crimson</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1063</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Maxwell Transfer and the Questions Around Todd Blanche (6/24/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-maxwell-transfer-and-the-questions-around-todd-blanche-6-24-26--72657937</link><description><![CDATA[Liz Oyer, a former DOJ pardon attorney, argues that Todd Blanche and the Trump Justice Department have been hiding the real reason Ghislaine Maxwell was moved from FCI Tallahassee to the minimum-security Federal Prison Camp Bryan in Texas after Blanche personally interviewed her for roughly nine hours over two days. Maxwell, who is serving 20 years for helping Jeffrey Epstein sexually exploit girls, gave Trump highly favorable statements during that meeting, saying he was “a gentleman” and denying that she ever saw him behave inappropriately with Epstein. Days later, she was moved to a far less restrictive prison camp, despite Bureau of Prisons rules that generally bar convicted sex offenders from minimum-security camps because they carry a “public safety factor” requiring at least low-security confinement.<br /><br />The core accusation is that the DOJ’s public explanation does not hold up. BOP claimed Maxwell was moved for safety reasons and that there was no special treatment, but Oyer says safety threats are normally handled through protective custody, SHU placement, or a transfer to another appropriate low-security facility — not by sending a convicted sex trafficker to the least-secure kind of federal prison. The “clear admission,” in her view, is a May 6, 2026 change to BOP policy giving the attorney general power to designate or redesignate where prisoners are held, which she sees as a retroactive attempt to justify what already happened to Maxwell and to give Blanche sweeping power over prisoner placement. Her conclusion is blunt: this looks like preferential treatment for Maxwell, potentially tied to protecting Trump, and it should be a major line of questioning at Blanche’s confirmation hearing.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.rawstory.com/trump-epstein-2677078514/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">'Clear admission' Trump DOJ broke rules to help Ghislaine Maxwell uncovered by expert - Raw Story</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72657937</guid><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 14:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72657937/maxwellblanchetransfercoverup.mp3" length="10311097" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8f0d13f0-bbb1-400d-8a9c-467d9a6616f1/8f0d13f0-bbb1-400d-8a9c-467d9a6616f1.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8f0d13f0-bbb1-400d-8a9c-467d9a6616f1/8f0d13f0-bbb1-400d-8a9c-467d9a6616f1.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8f0d13f0-bbb1-400d-8a9c-467d9a6616f1/8f0d13f0-bbb1-400d-8a9c-467d9a6616f1.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Liz Oyer, a former DOJ pardon attorney, argues that Todd Blanche and the Trump Justice Department have been hiding the real reason Ghislaine Maxwell was moved from FCI Tallahassee to the minimum-security Federal Prison Camp Bryan in Texas after...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Liz Oyer, a former DOJ pardon attorney, argues that Todd Blanche and the Trump Justice Department have been hiding the real reason Ghislaine Maxwell was moved from FCI Tallahassee to the minimum-security Federal Prison Camp Bryan in Texas after Blanche personally interviewed her for roughly nine hours over two days. Maxwell, who is serving 20 years for helping Jeffrey Epstein sexually exploit girls, gave Trump highly favorable statements during that meeting, saying he was “a gentleman” and denying that she ever saw him behave inappropriately with Epstein. Days later, she was moved to a far less restrictive prison camp, despite Bureau of Prisons rules that generally bar convicted sex offenders from minimum-security camps because they carry a “public safety factor” requiring at least low-security confinement.<br /><br />The core accusation is that the DOJ’s public explanation does not hold up. BOP claimed Maxwell was moved for safety reasons and that there was no special treatment, but Oyer says safety threats are normally handled through protective custody, SHU placement, or a transfer to another appropriate low-security facility — not by sending a convicted sex trafficker to the least-secure kind of federal prison. The “clear admission,” in her view, is a May 6, 2026 change to BOP policy giving the attorney general power to designate or redesignate where prisoners are held, which she sees as a retroactive attempt to justify what already happened to Maxwell and to give Blanche sweeping power over prisoner placement. Her conclusion is blunt: this looks like preferential treatment for Maxwell, potentially tied to protecting Trump, and it should be a major line of questioning at Blanche’s confirmation hearing.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.rawstory.com/trump-epstein-2677078514/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">'Clear admission' Trump DOJ broke rules to help Ghislaine Maxwell uncovered by expert - Raw Story</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>645</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Former Prince Andrew Still Has Some Supporters In His Corner (6/24/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/former-prince-andrew-still-has-some-supporters-in-his-corner-6-24-26--72657936</link><description><![CDATA[Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor is portrayed as someone whose public charm and privileged image always sat alongside a much uglier reputation behind the scenes. His former girlfriend Sandi Jones described him as a “real character” who liked making people laugh and was popular with women, but that softer image is contrasted with accounts of Andrew as loud, spoiled, arrogant, and difficult from childhood onward. The broader portrait is of a man indulged by royal status, treated as the Queen’s favorite son, and allowed to move through life with a sense that ordinary rules did not apply to him.<br /><br />That personality profile becomes part of the larger explanation for his downfall: Andrew was once marketed as the handsome war-hero prince, especially after serving as a helicopter pilot during the Falklands, but the old “Randy Andy” image curdled into something far darker as his behavior, judgment, friendships, and entitlement came under scrutiny. The same traits once dismissed as cheeky royal mischief — arrogance, self-importance, vulgar humor, and a need to be catered to — are presented as warning signs that followed him into adulthood, through his failed marriage, his trade envoy controversies, his Epstein association, the disastrous Newsnight interview, and finally his collapse into disgrace.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/2220362/Andrew-Mountbatten-Windsor-ex-real-personality" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor's ex-girlfriend sums up his 'real personality' in four words | Royal | News | Express.co.uk</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72657936</guid><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 12:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72657936/andrewsfriendscometohisdefense.mp3" length="10660511" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/08de5100-9dc7-4378-a970-c8445e76bbd2/08de5100-9dc7-4378-a970-c8445e76bbd2.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/08de5100-9dc7-4378-a970-c8445e76bbd2/08de5100-9dc7-4378-a970-c8445e76bbd2.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/08de5100-9dc7-4378-a970-c8445e76bbd2/08de5100-9dc7-4378-a970-c8445e76bbd2.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor is portrayed as someone whose public charm and privileged image always sat alongside a much uglier reputation behind the scenes. His former girlfriend Sandi Jones described him as a “real character” who liked making people...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor is portrayed as someone whose public charm and privileged image always sat alongside a much uglier reputation behind the scenes. His former girlfriend Sandi Jones described him as a “real character” who liked making people laugh and was popular with women, but that softer image is contrasted with accounts of Andrew as loud, spoiled, arrogant, and difficult from childhood onward. The broader portrait is of a man indulged by royal status, treated as the Queen’s favorite son, and allowed to move through life with a sense that ordinary rules did not apply to him.<br /><br />That personality profile becomes part of the larger explanation for his downfall: Andrew was once marketed as the handsome war-hero prince, especially after serving as a helicopter pilot during the Falklands, but the old “Randy Andy” image curdled into something far darker as his behavior, judgment, friendships, and entitlement came under scrutiny. The same traits once dismissed as cheeky royal mischief — arrogance, self-importance, vulgar humor, and a need to be catered to — are presented as warning signs that followed him into adulthood, through his failed marriage, his trade envoy controversies, his Epstein association, the disastrous Newsnight interview, and finally his collapse into disgrace.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/2220362/Andrew-Mountbatten-Windsor-ex-real-personality" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor's ex-girlfriend sums up his 'real personality' in four words | Royal | News | Express.co.uk</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>667</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Jeffrey Epstein And The Sudden Onset Of Amnesia For Those Who Were Closest To him (6/24/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-the-sudden-onset-of-amnesia-for-those-who-were-closest-to-him-6-24-26--72654678</link><description><![CDATA[The great lie of the Epstein scandal isn’t just what he did, but how the powerful around him suddenly claimed they couldn’t remember him at all. Presidents, princes, billionaires, academics, bankers, and celebrities who once courted his money and shared his jets all reached for the same script when the walls closed in: I barely knew him. It was a coordinated act of survival, not an accident. Institutions like Harvard, MIT, Deutsche Bank, and JP Morgan played the same game, pretending they never saw the red flags. Legacy media, instead of hammering the contradictions, often published these denials straight, allowing amnesia to masquerade as truth. Forgetting became strategy, and strategy became cover.<br /><br /><br />But memory leaves evidence. Flight logs, photographs, donations, and testimonies remain, and every denial only underscores the complicity of those who looked away. The survivors don’t get to forget; they live with scars while the powerful rewrite history. What the amnesia act reveals is cowardice: a willingness to erase reality to protect reputation. Epstein built his empire on memory, yet his circle tried to survive through erasure. In the end, their denials brand them more deeply than their associations ever could—because the attempt to forget is itself proof they remembered perfectly well.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72654678</guid><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 10:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72654678/megaepsteinamnesia.mp3" length="24906231" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2042d521-6994-4717-911c-ae63a4e292c3/2042d521-6994-4717-911c-ae63a4e292c3.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2042d521-6994-4717-911c-ae63a4e292c3/2042d521-6994-4717-911c-ae63a4e292c3.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2042d521-6994-4717-911c-ae63a4e292c3/2042d521-6994-4717-911c-ae63a4e292c3.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The great lie of the Epstein scandal isn’t just what he did, but how the powerful around him suddenly claimed they couldn’t remember him at all. Presidents, princes, billionaires, academics, bankers, and celebrities who once courted his money and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The great lie of the Epstein scandal isn’t just what he did, but how the powerful around him suddenly claimed they couldn’t remember him at all. Presidents, princes, billionaires, academics, bankers, and celebrities who once courted his money and shared his jets all reached for the same script when the walls closed in: I barely knew him. It was a coordinated act of survival, not an accident. Institutions like Harvard, MIT, Deutsche Bank, and JP Morgan played the same game, pretending they never saw the red flags. Legacy media, instead of hammering the contradictions, often published these denials straight, allowing amnesia to masquerade as truth. Forgetting became strategy, and strategy became cover.<br /><br /><br />But memory leaves evidence. Flight logs, photographs, donations, and testimonies remain, and every denial only underscores the complicity of those who looked away. The survivors don’t get to forget; they live with scars while the powerful rewrite history. What the amnesia act reveals is cowardice: a willingness to erase reality to protect reputation. Epstein built his empire on memory, yet his circle tried to survive through erasure. In the end, their denials brand them more deeply than their associations ever could—because the attempt to forget is itself proof they remembered perfectly well.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1557</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Alex Acosta And His Epstein Interview With OIG Inspectors (Part 13-15) (6/24/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-alex-acosta-and-his-epstein-interview-with-oig-inspectors-part-13-15-6-24-26--72654668</link><description><![CDATA[In his interview with the DOJ Office of the Inspector General, Alex Acosta repeatedly framed the 2007–2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement as a constrained, pragmatic decision made under pressure rather than a deliberate act of favoritism. He told inspectors that Epstein’s defense team, stacked with politically connected and aggressive lawyers, created what he described as a credible threat of a federal indictment collapse if prosecutors pushed too hard. Acosta emphasized that his office believed securing some conviction at the state level was better than risking none at all, and he claimed he was focused on avoiding a scenario where Epstein walked entirely. Throughout the interview, Acosta leaned heavily on the idea that the deal was the product of risk assessment, limited evidence, and internal prosecutorial judgment rather than corruption or improper influence, repeatedly asserting that he acted in good faith.<br /><br /><br />At the same time, the OIG interview exposed glaring gaps and evasions in Acosta’s account, particularly regarding victims’ rights and transparency. He acknowledged that victims were not informed about the existence or finalization of the NPA, but attempted to downplay this as a procedural failure rather than a substantive violation of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act. Acosta also distanced himself from the unusual secrecy of the agreement, suggesting that others in his office handled victim communications and specific drafting decisions. Most damaging, however, was his inability to offer a coherent justification for why Epstein received terms so extraordinary that they effectively shut down federal accountability altogether. The interview left the unmistakable impression of a former U.S. Attorney attempting to launder an indefensible outcome through bureaucratic language, while avoiding responsibility for a deal that insulated Epstein and his network from meaningful scrutiny for more than a decade.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%207/EFTA00009229.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00009229.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72654668</guid><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 08:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72654668/megaacostaoig13n14n15.mp3" length="36943456" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/09b286c3-1fa4-443a-9199-324b6a7af412/09b286c3-1fa4-443a-9199-324b6a7af412.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/09b286c3-1fa4-443a-9199-324b6a7af412/09b286c3-1fa4-443a-9199-324b6a7af412.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/09b286c3-1fa4-443a-9199-324b6a7af412/09b286c3-1fa4-443a-9199-324b6a7af412.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In his interview with the DOJ Office of the Inspector General, Alex Acosta repeatedly framed the 2007–2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement as a constrained, pragmatic decision made under pressure rather than a deliberate act of favoritism. He told...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In his interview with the DOJ Office of the Inspector General, Alex Acosta repeatedly framed the 2007–2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement as a constrained, pragmatic decision made under pressure rather than a deliberate act of favoritism. He told inspectors that Epstein’s defense team, stacked with politically connected and aggressive lawyers, created what he described as a credible threat of a federal indictment collapse if prosecutors pushed too hard. Acosta emphasized that his office believed securing some conviction at the state level was better than risking none at all, and he claimed he was focused on avoiding a scenario where Epstein walked entirely. Throughout the interview, Acosta leaned heavily on the idea that the deal was the product of risk assessment, limited evidence, and internal prosecutorial judgment rather than corruption or improper influence, repeatedly asserting that he acted in good faith.<br /><br /><br />At the same time, the OIG interview exposed glaring gaps and evasions in Acosta’s account, particularly regarding victims’ rights and transparency. He acknowledged that victims were not informed about the existence or finalization of the NPA, but attempted to downplay this as a procedural failure rather than a substantive violation of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act. Acosta also distanced himself from the unusual secrecy of the agreement, suggesting that others in his office handled victim communications and specific drafting decisions. Most damaging, however, was his inability to offer a coherent justification for why Epstein received terms so extraordinary that they effectively shut down federal accountability altogether. The interview left the unmistakable impression of a former U.S. Attorney attempting to launder an indefensible outcome through bureaucratic language, while avoiding responsibility for a deal that insulated Epstein and his network from meaningful scrutiny for more than a decade.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%207/EFTA00009229.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00009229.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2309</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Alex Acosta And His Epstein Interview With OIG Inspectors (Part 10-12) (6/23/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-alex-acosta-and-his-epstein-interview-with-oig-inspectors-part-10-12-6-23-26--72654663</link><description><![CDATA[In his interview with the DOJ Office of the Inspector General, Alex Acosta repeatedly framed the 2007–2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement as a constrained, pragmatic decision made under pressure rather than a deliberate act of favoritism. He told inspectors that Epstein’s defense team, stacked with politically connected and aggressive lawyers, created what he described as a credible threat of a federal indictment collapse if prosecutors pushed too hard. Acosta emphasized that his office believed securing some conviction at the state level was better than risking none at all, and he claimed he was focused on avoiding a scenario where Epstein walked entirely. Throughout the interview, Acosta leaned heavily on the idea that the deal was the product of risk assessment, limited evidence, and internal prosecutorial judgment rather than corruption or improper influence, repeatedly asserting that he acted in good faith.<br /><br /><br />At the same time, the OIG interview exposed glaring gaps and evasions in Acosta’s account, particularly regarding victims’ rights and transparency. He acknowledged that victims were not informed about the existence or finalization of the NPA, but attempted to downplay this as a procedural failure rather than a substantive violation of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act. Acosta also distanced himself from the unusual secrecy of the agreement, suggesting that others in his office handled victim communications and specific drafting decisions. Most damaging, however, was his inability to offer a coherent justification for why Epstein received terms so extraordinary that they effectively shut down federal accountability altogether. The interview left the unmistakable impression of a former U.S. Attorney attempting to launder an indefensible outcome through bureaucratic language, while avoiding responsibility for a deal that insulated Epstein and his network from meaningful scrutiny for more than a decade.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%207/EFTA00009229.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00009229.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72654663</guid><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 06:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72654663/megaacostaoig10n11n12.mp3" length="41296919" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a7d6e7e0-5b5d-43dd-8ac4-19959af19b35/a7d6e7e0-5b5d-43dd-8ac4-19959af19b35.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a7d6e7e0-5b5d-43dd-8ac4-19959af19b35/a7d6e7e0-5b5d-43dd-8ac4-19959af19b35.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a7d6e7e0-5b5d-43dd-8ac4-19959af19b35/a7d6e7e0-5b5d-43dd-8ac4-19959af19b35.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In his interview with the DOJ Office of the Inspector General, Alex Acosta repeatedly framed the 2007–2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement as a constrained, pragmatic decision made under pressure rather than a deliberate act of favoritism. He told...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In his interview with the DOJ Office of the Inspector General, Alex Acosta repeatedly framed the 2007–2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement as a constrained, pragmatic decision made under pressure rather than a deliberate act of favoritism. He told inspectors that Epstein’s defense team, stacked with politically connected and aggressive lawyers, created what he described as a credible threat of a federal indictment collapse if prosecutors pushed too hard. Acosta emphasized that his office believed securing some conviction at the state level was better than risking none at all, and he claimed he was focused on avoiding a scenario where Epstein walked entirely. Throughout the interview, Acosta leaned heavily on the idea that the deal was the product of risk assessment, limited evidence, and internal prosecutorial judgment rather than corruption or improper influence, repeatedly asserting that he acted in good faith.<br /><br /><br />At the same time, the OIG interview exposed glaring gaps and evasions in Acosta’s account, particularly regarding victims’ rights and transparency. He acknowledged that victims were not informed about the existence or finalization of the NPA, but attempted to downplay this as a procedural failure rather than a substantive violation of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act. Acosta also distanced himself from the unusual secrecy of the agreement, suggesting that others in his office handled victim communications and specific drafting decisions. Most damaging, however, was his inability to offer a coherent justification for why Epstein received terms so extraordinary that they effectively shut down federal accountability altogether. The interview left the unmistakable impression of a former U.S. Attorney attempting to launder an indefensible outcome through bureaucratic language, while avoiding responsibility for a deal that insulated Epstein and his network from meaningful scrutiny for more than a decade.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%207/EFTA00009229.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00009229.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2582</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Death Of Jean Luc Brunel</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-death-of-jean-luc-brunel--72652148</link><description><![CDATA[Jean-Luc Brunel was found dead in his cell at La Santé prison in Paris during the early hours of February 19, 2022. French authorities said the 75-year-old modeling agent had been found hanged during an overnight inspection and treated his death as a suicide. Brunel had been held in custody since his arrest at Charles de Gaulle Airport in December 2020, when authorities detained him as he was preparing to fly to Senegal. He was under formal investigation over allegations involving the rape and sexual assault of minors and adults, as well as suspicions that he had helped arrange transportation and accommodations for young women connected to Jeffrey Epstein. Brunel denied the allegations against him and died before the case could proceed to trial.<br /><br />Brunel had been a prominent figure in the international modeling industry and founded MC2 Model Management with financial backing from Epstein. Multiple women had accused him of sexual misconduct over several decades, while Virginia Giuffre alleged in court filings that he supplied young women and girls to Epstein. His death ended the possibility that he would face a public trial, testify under oath or be questioned further about his relationship with Epstein and others in their social and business circles. French authorities opened an investigation into the circumstances of his death, but officials reported no immediate indication that another person had been involved.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72652148</guid><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 04:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72652148/deathjeanluc.mp3" length="20279423" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e6be5a60-cb51-4e60-b463-c77d3f0a37f5/e6be5a60-cb51-4e60-b463-c77d3f0a37f5.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e6be5a60-cb51-4e60-b463-c77d3f0a37f5/e6be5a60-cb51-4e60-b463-c77d3f0a37f5.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e6be5a60-cb51-4e60-b463-c77d3f0a37f5/e6be5a60-cb51-4e60-b463-c77d3f0a37f5.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jean-Luc Brunel was found dead in his cell at La Santé prison in Paris during the early hours of February 19, 2022. French authorities said the 75-year-old modeling agent had been found hanged during an overnight inspection and treated his death as a...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jean-Luc Brunel was found dead in his cell at La Santé prison in Paris during the early hours of February 19, 2022. French authorities said the 75-year-old modeling agent had been found hanged during an overnight inspection and treated his death as a suicide. Brunel had been held in custody since his arrest at Charles de Gaulle Airport in December 2020, when authorities detained him as he was preparing to fly to Senegal. He was under formal investigation over allegations involving the rape and sexual assault of minors and adults, as well as suspicions that he had helped arrange transportation and accommodations for young women connected to Jeffrey Epstein. Brunel denied the allegations against him and died before the case could proceed to trial.<br /><br />Brunel had been a prominent figure in the international modeling industry and founded MC2 Model Management with financial backing from Epstein. Multiple women had accused him of sexual misconduct over several decades, while Virginia Giuffre alleged in court filings that he supplied young women and girls to Epstein. His death ended the possibility that he would face a public trial, testify under oath or be questioned further about his relationship with Epstein and others in their social and business circles. French authorities opened an investigation into the circumstances of his death, but officials reported no immediate indication that another person had been involved.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1268</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Jennifer Araoz And Her Lawsuit Filed  Against The Jeffrey Epstein Estate (Part 7)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/jennifer-araoz-and-her-lawsuit-filed-against-the-jeffrey-epstein-estate-part-7--72604374</link><description><![CDATA[Jennifer Araoz filed a lawsuit against the Epstein Estate, alleging she was groomed and sexually assaulted by Jeffrey Epstein when she was a teenager. The lawsuit claims that Araoz was recruited outside her New York City high school by Epstein’s associates, who promised career opportunities and financial support. Over time, Epstein allegedly coerced her into repeated sexual encounters, culminating in a rape at his Manhattan townhouse when she was just 15 years old. Araoz contends that Epstein’s vast network of accomplices played an active role in enabling the abuse by fostering an environment of manipulation and control.<br /><br /><br />The lawsuit not only targets Epstein’s estate but also implicates other individuals and entities that Araoz claims facilitated his criminal activities. Seeking both justice and compensation, Araoz’s suit is part of a broader legal effort by Epstein’s survivors to hold those connected to his network accountable. The case underscores the alleged systemic nature of Epstein’s operations, highlighting the complicity of those who worked with him to sustain his predatory behavior.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.vicourts.org/common/pages/DisplayFile.aspx?itemId=16191993" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jeffrey Epstein ST-19-PB-80 Additional filings (003).pdf (vicourts.org)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72604374</guid><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 02:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72604374/araoz7.mp3" length="14096134" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/94b1e158-4e5f-44e8-b12f-6cd2fda5cede/94b1e158-4e5f-44e8-b12f-6cd2fda5cede.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/94b1e158-4e5f-44e8-b12f-6cd2fda5cede/94b1e158-4e5f-44e8-b12f-6cd2fda5cede.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/94b1e158-4e5f-44e8-b12f-6cd2fda5cede/94b1e158-4e5f-44e8-b12f-6cd2fda5cede.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jennifer Araoz filed a lawsuit against the Epstein Estate, alleging she was groomed and sexually assaulted by Jeffrey Epstein when she was a teenager. The lawsuit claims that Araoz was recruited outside her New York City high school by Epstein’s...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jennifer Araoz filed a lawsuit against the Epstein Estate, alleging she was groomed and sexually assaulted by Jeffrey Epstein when she was a teenager. The lawsuit claims that Araoz was recruited outside her New York City high school by Epstein’s associates, who promised career opportunities and financial support. Over time, Epstein allegedly coerced her into repeated sexual encounters, culminating in a rape at his Manhattan townhouse when she was just 15 years old. Araoz contends that Epstein’s vast network of accomplices played an active role in enabling the abuse by fostering an environment of manipulation and control.<br /><br /><br />The lawsuit not only targets Epstein’s estate but also implicates other individuals and entities that Araoz claims facilitated his criminal activities. Seeking both justice and compensation, Araoz’s suit is part of a broader legal effort by Epstein’s survivors to hold those connected to his network accountable. The case underscores the alleged systemic nature of Epstein’s operations, highlighting the complicity of those who worked with him to sustain his predatory behavior.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.vicourts.org/common/pages/DisplayFile.aspx?itemId=16191993" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jeffrey Epstein ST-19-PB-80 Additional filings (003).pdf (vicourts.org)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>881</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Jennifer Araoz And Her Lawsuit Filed  Against The Jeffrey Epstein Estate (Part 6)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/jennifer-araoz-and-her-lawsuit-filed-against-the-jeffrey-epstein-estate-part-6--72604378</link><description><![CDATA[Jennifer Araoz filed a lawsuit against the Epstein Estate, alleging she was groomed and sexually assaulted by Jeffrey Epstein when she was a teenager. The lawsuit claims that Araoz was recruited outside her New York City high school by Epstein’s associates, who promised career opportunities and financial support. Over time, Epstein allegedly coerced her into repeated sexual encounters, culminating in a rape at his Manhattan townhouse when she was just 15 years old. Araoz contends that Epstein’s vast network of accomplices played an active role in enabling the abuse by fostering an environment of manipulation and control.<br /><br /><br />The lawsuit not only targets Epstein’s estate but also implicates other individuals and entities that Araoz claims facilitated his criminal activities. Seeking both justice and compensation, Araoz’s suit is part of a broader legal effort by Epstein’s survivors to hold those connected to his network accountable. The case underscores the alleged systemic nature of Epstein’s operations, highlighting the complicity of those who worked with him to sustain his predatory behavior.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.vicourts.org/common/pages/DisplayFile.aspx?itemId=16191993" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jeffrey Epstein ST-19-PB-80 Additional filings (003).pdf (vicourts.org)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72604378</guid><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 00:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72604378/araoz6.mp3" length="13041205" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e2f1921d-c341-41e2-a4e9-72e4cf9ae4d2/e2f1921d-c341-41e2-a4e9-72e4cf9ae4d2.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e2f1921d-c341-41e2-a4e9-72e4cf9ae4d2/e2f1921d-c341-41e2-a4e9-72e4cf9ae4d2.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e2f1921d-c341-41e2-a4e9-72e4cf9ae4d2/e2f1921d-c341-41e2-a4e9-72e4cf9ae4d2.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jennifer Araoz filed a lawsuit against the Epstein Estate, alleging she was groomed and sexually assaulted by Jeffrey Epstein when she was a teenager. The lawsuit claims that Araoz was recruited outside her New York City high school by Epstein’s...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jennifer Araoz filed a lawsuit against the Epstein Estate, alleging she was groomed and sexually assaulted by Jeffrey Epstein when she was a teenager. The lawsuit claims that Araoz was recruited outside her New York City high school by Epstein’s associates, who promised career opportunities and financial support. Over time, Epstein allegedly coerced her into repeated sexual encounters, culminating in a rape at his Manhattan townhouse when she was just 15 years old. Araoz contends that Epstein’s vast network of accomplices played an active role in enabling the abuse by fostering an environment of manipulation and control.<br /><br /><br />The lawsuit not only targets Epstein’s estate but also implicates other individuals and entities that Araoz claims facilitated his criminal activities. Seeking both justice and compensation, Araoz’s suit is part of a broader legal effort by Epstein’s survivors to hold those connected to his network accountable. The case underscores the alleged systemic nature of Epstein’s operations, highlighting the complicity of those who worked with him to sustain his predatory behavior.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.vicourts.org/common/pages/DisplayFile.aspx?itemId=16191993" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jeffrey Epstein ST-19-PB-80 Additional filings (003).pdf (vicourts.org)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>816</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Jennifer Araoz And Her Lawsuit Filed  Against The Jeffrey Epstein Estate (Part 5)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/jennifer-araoz-and-her-lawsuit-filed-against-the-jeffrey-epstein-estate-part-5--72604373</link><description><![CDATA[Jennifer Araoz filed a lawsuit against the Epstein Estate, alleging she was groomed and sexually assaulted by Jeffrey Epstein when she was a teenager. The lawsuit claims that Araoz was recruited outside her New York City high school by Epstein’s associates, who promised career opportunities and financial support. Over time, Epstein allegedly coerced her into repeated sexual encounters, culminating in a rape at his Manhattan townhouse when she was just 15 years old. Araoz contends that Epstein’s vast network of accomplices played an active role in enabling the abuse by fostering an environment of manipulation and control.<br /><br /><br />The lawsuit not only targets Epstein’s estate but also implicates other individuals and entities that Araoz claims facilitated his criminal activities. Seeking both justice and compensation, Araoz’s suit is part of a broader legal effort by Epstein’s survivors to hold those connected to his network accountable. The case underscores the alleged systemic nature of Epstein’s operations, highlighting the complicity of those who worked with him to sustain his predatory behavior.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.vicourts.org/common/pages/DisplayFile.aspx?itemId=16191993" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jeffrey Epstein ST-19-PB-80 Additional filings (003).pdf (vicourts.org)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72604373</guid><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 22:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72604373/araoz5.mp3" length="17755367" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f47d9638-31a1-466d-a993-11a272b3e104/f47d9638-31a1-466d-a993-11a272b3e104.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f47d9638-31a1-466d-a993-11a272b3e104/f47d9638-31a1-466d-a993-11a272b3e104.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f47d9638-31a1-466d-a993-11a272b3e104/f47d9638-31a1-466d-a993-11a272b3e104.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jennifer Araoz filed a lawsuit against the Epstein Estate, alleging she was groomed and sexually assaulted by Jeffrey Epstein when she was a teenager. The lawsuit claims that Araoz was recruited outside her New York City high school by Epstein’s...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jennifer Araoz filed a lawsuit against the Epstein Estate, alleging she was groomed and sexually assaulted by Jeffrey Epstein when she was a teenager. The lawsuit claims that Araoz was recruited outside her New York City high school by Epstein’s associates, who promised career opportunities and financial support. Over time, Epstein allegedly coerced her into repeated sexual encounters, culminating in a rape at his Manhattan townhouse when she was just 15 years old. Araoz contends that Epstein’s vast network of accomplices played an active role in enabling the abuse by fostering an environment of manipulation and control.<br /><br /><br />The lawsuit not only targets Epstein’s estate but also implicates other individuals and entities that Araoz claims facilitated his criminal activities. Seeking both justice and compensation, Araoz’s suit is part of a broader legal effort by Epstein’s survivors to hold those connected to his network accountable. The case underscores the alleged systemic nature of Epstein’s operations, highlighting the complicity of those who worked with him to sustain his predatory behavior.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.vicourts.org/common/pages/DisplayFile.aspx?itemId=16191993" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jeffrey Epstein ST-19-PB-80 Additional filings (003).pdf (vicourts.org)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1110</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Tova Noel And The Transcript From Her Congressional Testimony (Part 6) (6/23/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/tova-noel-and-the-transcript-from-her-congressional-testimony-part-6-6-23-26--72636329</link><description><![CDATA[Tova Noel, one of the two correctional officers assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center’s Special Housing Unit on the night Jeffrey Epstein died, told the House Oversight Committee that she failed to conduct the required inmate checks and later signed records falsely indicating that the rounds had been completed. Noel described an understaffed, poorly managed facility in which she was exhausted, inadequately trained and assigned duties beyond her normal responsibilities. She maintained that she last saw Epstein alive during the evening medication round and observed nothing that made her believe he was preparing to harm himself. Noel also testified that Epstein received unusual accommodations, including extra bed linens, a CPAP machine and access to medication that appeared different from the treatment ordinarily given to other prisoners.<br /><br />Noel denied having any role in Epstein’s death, receiving money in connection with him or knowing anything about an alleged payment to facilitate access to his cell. She also rejected claims that she was the unidentified orange-colored figure seen moving toward Epstein’s tier at approximately 10:39 p.m., insisting that she never returned to the area and could not explain what—or who—the surveillance image showed. Although Noel said she believed Epstein died by suicide because he was supposedly alone inside the cell, her testimony did little to resolve the most important unanswered questions: why required checks were abandoned, why Epstein remained without a cellmate, who or what appeared near the tier, and how so many security procedures failed simultaneously. Instead, her account reinforced the picture of extraordinary negligence, special treatment and institutional dysfunction surrounding the death of the most consequential prisoner in federal custody.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72636329</guid><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 20:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72636329/tovanoelcongresstranscript6.mp3" length="12375397" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cc7ba180-0225-4860-97df-5f36a8f03cf9/cc7ba180-0225-4860-97df-5f36a8f03cf9.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cc7ba180-0225-4860-97df-5f36a8f03cf9/cc7ba180-0225-4860-97df-5f36a8f03cf9.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cc7ba180-0225-4860-97df-5f36a8f03cf9/cc7ba180-0225-4860-97df-5f36a8f03cf9.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Tova Noel, one of the two correctional officers assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center’s Special Housing Unit on the night Jeffrey Epstein died, told the House Oversight Committee that she failed to conduct the required inmate checks and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Tova Noel, one of the two correctional officers assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center’s Special Housing Unit on the night Jeffrey Epstein died, told the House Oversight Committee that she failed to conduct the required inmate checks and later signed records falsely indicating that the rounds had been completed. Noel described an understaffed, poorly managed facility in which she was exhausted, inadequately trained and assigned duties beyond her normal responsibilities. She maintained that she last saw Epstein alive during the evening medication round and observed nothing that made her believe he was preparing to harm himself. Noel also testified that Epstein received unusual accommodations, including extra bed linens, a CPAP machine and access to medication that appeared different from the treatment ordinarily given to other prisoners.<br /><br />Noel denied having any role in Epstein’s death, receiving money in connection with him or knowing anything about an alleged payment to facilitate access to his cell. She also rejected claims that she was the unidentified orange-colored figure seen moving toward Epstein’s tier at approximately 10:39 p.m., insisting that she never returned to the area and could not explain what—or who—the surveillance image showed. Although Noel said she believed Epstein died by suicide because he was supposedly alone inside the cell, her testimony did little to resolve the most important unanswered questions: why required checks were abandoned, why Epstein remained without a cellmate, who or what appeared near the tier, and how so many security procedures failed simultaneously. Instead, her account reinforced the picture of extraordinary negligence, special treatment and institutional dysfunction surrounding the death of the most consequential prisoner in federal custody.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>774</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The UK Inquiry Into Grooming Gangs:  Whitney, Fiona And Michelle Tell Their Stories (6/23/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-uk-inquiry-into-grooming-gangs-whitney-fiona-and-michelle-tell-their-stories-6-23-26--72636313</link><description><![CDATA[Rupert Lowe’s inquiry says it received evidence from survivors, relatives, whistleblowers, professionals and political figures about organised child sexual exploitation in communities across the United Kingdom. The report describes a recurring pattern in which vulnerable girls were targeted with attention, gifts, alcohol and drugs before being subjected to sexual violence, intimidation and trafficking between offenders and locations. It states that the victims discussed in the evidence were predominantly white British girls and that many of the alleged perpetrators were men of Pakistani Muslim heritage. The inquiry says the abuse was allowed to continue because police forces, social services, schools, healthcare providers, licensing authorities and government bodies repeatedly failed to identify victims, share information, investigate allegations properly or intervene when clear warning signs appeared.<br /><br />The report calls for mandatory reporting of suspected child sexual exploitation, improved collection of demographic information about victims and offenders, specialist police units and a consistent national system for sharing safeguarding intelligence. It also recommends regular training for police officers, teachers, medical staff and social workers; automatic referrals when children present with injuries, pregnancies, sexually transmitted infections, self-harm or other indicators of exploitation; and long-term medical, psychological, housing and legal support for survivors. Additional recommendations include reviewing convictions imposed on children who committed offences while being exploited, stronger sentencing, deportation proceedings against convicted foreign nationals where legally applicable, and legal action against perpetrators or officials believed to have escaped accountability.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://static1.squarespace.com/static/6810978a41bbc42489eafa81/t/6a314bb1151e511944bd4421/1781615537601/The+Rape+Gang+Inquiry+Report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Rape Gang Inquiry Report.docx</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72636313</guid><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 18:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72636313/ukgrooming4_whitneyfionamichelle.mp3" length="11998398" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ec2960a0-26e1-4df4-9ad5-332bb4af56a6/ec2960a0-26e1-4df4-9ad5-332bb4af56a6.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ec2960a0-26e1-4df4-9ad5-332bb4af56a6/ec2960a0-26e1-4df4-9ad5-332bb4af56a6.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ec2960a0-26e1-4df4-9ad5-332bb4af56a6/ec2960a0-26e1-4df4-9ad5-332bb4af56a6.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Rupert Lowe’s inquiry says it received evidence from survivors, relatives, whistleblowers, professionals and political figures about organised child sexual exploitation in communities across the United Kingdom. The report describes a recurring pattern...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Rupert Lowe’s inquiry says it received evidence from survivors, relatives, whistleblowers, professionals and political figures about organised child sexual exploitation in communities across the United Kingdom. The report describes a recurring pattern in which vulnerable girls were targeted with attention, gifts, alcohol and drugs before being subjected to sexual violence, intimidation and trafficking between offenders and locations. It states that the victims discussed in the evidence were predominantly white British girls and that many of the alleged perpetrators were men of Pakistani Muslim heritage. The inquiry says the abuse was allowed to continue because police forces, social services, schools, healthcare providers, licensing authorities and government bodies repeatedly failed to identify victims, share information, investigate allegations properly or intervene when clear warning signs appeared.<br /><br />The report calls for mandatory reporting of suspected child sexual exploitation, improved collection of demographic information about victims and offenders, specialist police units and a consistent national system for sharing safeguarding intelligence. It also recommends regular training for police officers, teachers, medical staff and social workers; automatic referrals when children present with injuries, pregnancies, sexually transmitted infections, self-harm or other indicators of exploitation; and long-term medical, psychological, housing and legal support for survivors. Additional recommendations include reviewing convictions imposed on children who committed offences while being exploited, stronger sentencing, deportation proceedings against convicted foreign nationals where legally applicable, and legal action against perpetrators or officials believed to have escaped accountability.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://static1.squarespace.com/static/6810978a41bbc42489eafa81/t/6a314bb1151e511944bd4421/1781615537601/The+Rape+Gang+Inquiry+Report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Rape Gang Inquiry Report.docx</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>750</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Andrew Windsor and the New Air Stewardess Allegation (6/23/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/andrew-windsor-and-the-new-air-stewardess-allegation-6-23-26--72636324</link><description><![CDATA[Andrew Windsor is facing another wave of damaging allegations, this time tied to claims from royal biographer Andrew Lownie’s updated book about the House of York. One of the central accusations involves an airline stewardess who allegedly said Andrew behaved inappropriately during a flight, grabbing or spinning her around before grinding against her. The accusation adds to the larger image of Andrew as someone who moved through elite spaces with entitlement, arrogance, and a sense that normal boundaries did not apply to him.<br /><br />Another alleged airplane incident involves Andrew on a British Airways flight to New York in 2010, where a flight attendant claimed he complained that his bottled water was too cold before putting it inside his trousers and joking that it would warm up there. The broader point is that these stories are being folded into the already ugly public narrative surrounding Andrew: his Epstein ties, his fall from royal duties, his repeated denials, and the long-running accusations that he treated people around him with contempt while protected by status, money, and the institution around him.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72636324</guid><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 16:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72636324/airstewardessandrew.mp3" length="10947231" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e9b7b5d5-5fe1-44da-9e6b-1414c155fe0f/e9b7b5d5-5fe1-44da-9e6b-1414c155fe0f.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e9b7b5d5-5fe1-44da-9e6b-1414c155fe0f/e9b7b5d5-5fe1-44da-9e6b-1414c155fe0f.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e9b7b5d5-5fe1-44da-9e6b-1414c155fe0f/e9b7b5d5-5fe1-44da-9e6b-1414c155fe0f.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Andrew Windsor is facing another wave of damaging allegations, this time tied to claims from royal biographer Andrew Lownie’s updated book about the House of York. One of the central accusations involves an airline stewardess who allegedly said Andrew...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Andrew Windsor is facing another wave of damaging allegations, this time tied to claims from royal biographer Andrew Lownie’s updated book about the House of York. One of the central accusations involves an airline stewardess who allegedly said Andrew behaved inappropriately during a flight, grabbing or spinning her around before grinding against her. The accusation adds to the larger image of Andrew as someone who moved through elite spaces with entitlement, arrogance, and a sense that normal boundaries did not apply to him.<br /><br />Another alleged airplane incident involves Andrew on a British Airways flight to New York in 2010, where a flight attendant claimed he complained that his bottled water was too cold before putting it inside his trousers and joking that it would warm up there. The broader point is that these stories are being folded into the already ugly public narrative surrounding Andrew: his Epstein ties, his fall from royal duties, his repeated denials, and the long-running accusations that he treated people around him with contempt while protected by status, money, and the institution around him.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>685</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Systemic Failure, Human Choices, and the Death of Jeffrey Epstein (6/23/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/systemic-failure-human-choices-and-the-death-of-jeffrey-epstein-6-23-26--72636337</link><description><![CDATA[Calling Jeffrey Epstein’s death a “systemic failure” may be technically accurate, but it leaves out the human decisions that made that failure possible. Systems do not skip rounds, falsify logs, ignore cellmate requirements, or leave one of the most high-profile detainees in federal custody alone in a cell after an earlier incident. Tova Noel’s congressional testimony painted her as undertrained, overworked, and shaped by the dysfunctional culture inside MCC New York, but that does not erase the fact that she and Michael Thomas were assigned to watch Epstein and failed to carry out the checks that might have changed what happened. The larger institutional breakdown mattered, but it moved through people, choices, paperwork, missed warnings, and supervisors who allowed the conditions to exist.<br /><br />The most troubling unanswered questions remain higher up the chain: who approved Epstein being housed with Nicholas Tartaglione, who failed to replace his later cellmate after Reyes was moved, who knew Epstein was alone despite the cellmate requirement, and who decided Noel and Thomas should be working that shift despite fatigue, inexperience, or concerns about reliability. Noel and Thomas may have failed personally, but they also may have been placed inside a broken structure where failure was almost guaranteed. That does not prove they were deliberately set up, but it makes the question unavoidable. Until the public gets names, documents, and a clear chain of command for those critical decisions, the official explanation remains incomplete.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72636337</guid><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 14:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72636337/mccblameforepstendeath.mp3" length="18171237" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1d8402ee-9936-4c13-b18c-e32c7fb742c6/1d8402ee-9936-4c13-b18c-e32c7fb742c6.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1d8402ee-9936-4c13-b18c-e32c7fb742c6/1d8402ee-9936-4c13-b18c-e32c7fb742c6.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1d8402ee-9936-4c13-b18c-e32c7fb742c6/1d8402ee-9936-4c13-b18c-e32c7fb742c6.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Calling Jeffrey Epstein’s death a “systemic failure” may be technically accurate, but it leaves out the human decisions that made that failure possible. Systems do not skip rounds, falsify logs, ignore cellmate requirements, or leave one of the most...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Calling Jeffrey Epstein’s death a “systemic failure” may be technically accurate, but it leaves out the human decisions that made that failure possible. Systems do not skip rounds, falsify logs, ignore cellmate requirements, or leave one of the most high-profile detainees in federal custody alone in a cell after an earlier incident. Tova Noel’s congressional testimony painted her as undertrained, overworked, and shaped by the dysfunctional culture inside MCC New York, but that does not erase the fact that she and Michael Thomas were assigned to watch Epstein and failed to carry out the checks that might have changed what happened. The larger institutional breakdown mattered, but it moved through people, choices, paperwork, missed warnings, and supervisors who allowed the conditions to exist.<br /><br />The most troubling unanswered questions remain higher up the chain: who approved Epstein being housed with Nicholas Tartaglione, who failed to replace his later cellmate after Reyes was moved, who knew Epstein was alone despite the cellmate requirement, and who decided Noel and Thomas should be working that shift despite fatigue, inexperience, or concerns about reliability. Noel and Thomas may have failed personally, but they also may have been placed inside a broken structure where failure was almost guaranteed. That does not prove they were deliberately set up, but it makes the question unavoidable. Until the public gets names, documents, and a clear chain of command for those critical decisions, the official explanation remains incomplete.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1136</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>New Mexico’s Truth Commission Demands Answers From U.S. Attorney’s Offices Tied to Epstein (6/23/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/new-mexico-s-truth-commission-demands-answers-from-u-s-attorney-s-offices-tied-to-epstein-6-23-26--72636325</link><description><![CDATA[New Mexico’s Epstein Truth Commission has expanded its investigation well beyond Zorro Ranch by subpoenaing federal prosecutors’ offices in South Carolina, southern Florida, Michigan’s eastern and western districts, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. The commission is looking for records showing whether those offices investigated Jeffrey Epstein, had information about his alleged crimes, and then declined to prosecute him. That matters because it pushes the inquiry past the familiar Florida non-prosecution deal with Alexander Acosta and into a broader question: how many offices, agencies, and officials had pieces of the Epstein puzzle and chose not to act?<br /><br />The South Carolina angle is part of that wider dragnet, not a standalone accusation that prosecutors there committed wrongdoing. According to Reuters, the new round of subpoenas brought the commission’s total to roughly 23, targeting law enforcement agencies, financial institutions, and other entities as New Mexico tries to identify people in power who may have known about Epstein’s abuse and looked away. The New Mexico DOJ is also running an active criminal investigation into Epstein-related activity in the state, including Zorro Ranch, and is asking the public for credible tips. For survivors, including Rachel Benavidez, the subpoenas represent another attempt to pierce the institutional silence that protected Epstein for years.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.postandcourier.com/news/new-mexico-epstein-investigation-targets-records-from-south-carolina-2-other-states/article_94738f8e-1819-48a1-9cfb-86ea3f3eb26f.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">New Mexico targets Jeffrey Epstein investigations in SC</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72636325</guid><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 12:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72636325/newmexicosouthcarolinasubpoena.mp3" length="13734182" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8f0a404c-13a6-4db7-a4ae-98a63341e80e/8f0a404c-13a6-4db7-a4ae-98a63341e80e.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8f0a404c-13a6-4db7-a4ae-98a63341e80e/8f0a404c-13a6-4db7-a4ae-98a63341e80e.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8f0a404c-13a6-4db7-a4ae-98a63341e80e/8f0a404c-13a6-4db7-a4ae-98a63341e80e.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>New Mexico’s Epstein Truth Commission has expanded its investigation well beyond Zorro Ranch by subpoenaing federal prosecutors’ offices in South Carolina, southern Florida, Michigan’s eastern and western districts, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. The...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[New Mexico’s Epstein Truth Commission has expanded its investigation well beyond Zorro Ranch by subpoenaing federal prosecutors’ offices in South Carolina, southern Florida, Michigan’s eastern and western districts, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. The commission is looking for records showing whether those offices investigated Jeffrey Epstein, had information about his alleged crimes, and then declined to prosecute him. That matters because it pushes the inquiry past the familiar Florida non-prosecution deal with Alexander Acosta and into a broader question: how many offices, agencies, and officials had pieces of the Epstein puzzle and chose not to act?<br /><br />The South Carolina angle is part of that wider dragnet, not a standalone accusation that prosecutors there committed wrongdoing. According to Reuters, the new round of subpoenas brought the commission’s total to roughly 23, targeting law enforcement agencies, financial institutions, and other entities as New Mexico tries to identify people in power who may have known about Epstein’s abuse and looked away. The New Mexico DOJ is also running an active criminal investigation into Epstein-related activity in the state, including Zorro Ranch, and is asking the public for credible tips. For survivors, including Rachel Benavidez, the subpoenas represent another attempt to pierce the institutional silence that protected Epstein for years.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.postandcourier.com/news/new-mexico-epstein-investigation-targets-records-from-south-carolina-2-other-states/article_94738f8e-1819-48a1-9cfb-86ea3f3eb26f.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">New Mexico targets Jeffrey Epstein investigations in SC</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>859</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Alex Acosta And His Epstein Interview With OIG Inspectors (Part 7-9) (6/22/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-alex-acosta-and-his-epstein-interview-with-oig-inspectors-part-7-9-6-22-26--72635552</link><description><![CDATA[In his interview with the DOJ Office of the Inspector General, Alex Acosta repeatedly framed the 2007–2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement as a constrained, pragmatic decision made under pressure rather than a deliberate act of favoritism. He told inspectors that Epstein’s defense team, stacked with politically connected and aggressive lawyers, created what he described as a credible threat of a federal indictment collapse if prosecutors pushed too hard. Acosta emphasized that his office believed securing some conviction at the state level was better than risking none at all, and he claimed he was focused on avoiding a scenario where Epstein walked entirely. Throughout the interview, Acosta leaned heavily on the idea that the deal was the product of risk assessment, limited evidence, and internal prosecutorial judgment rather than corruption or improper influence, repeatedly asserting that he acted in good faith.<br /><br /><br />At the same time, the OIG interview exposed glaring gaps and evasions in Acosta’s account, particularly regarding victims’ rights and transparency. He acknowledged that victims were not informed about the existence or finalization of the NPA, but attempted to downplay this as a procedural failure rather than a substantive violation of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act. Acosta also distanced himself from the unusual secrecy of the agreement, suggesting that others in his office handled victim communications and specific drafting decisions. Most damaging, however, was his inability to offer a coherent justification for why Epstein received terms so extraordinary that they effectively shut down federal accountability altogether. The interview left the unmistakable impression of a former U.S. Attorney attempting to launder an indefensible outcome through bureaucratic language, while avoiding responsibility for a deal that insulated Epstein and his network from meaningful scrutiny for more than a decade.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%207/EFTA00009229.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00009229.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72635552</guid><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 10:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72635552/megaacostaoig7n8n9.mp3" length="42261568" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/534ca12f-53ce-4491-8fa5-1605c5864eee/534ca12f-53ce-4491-8fa5-1605c5864eee.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/534ca12f-53ce-4491-8fa5-1605c5864eee/534ca12f-53ce-4491-8fa5-1605c5864eee.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/534ca12f-53ce-4491-8fa5-1605c5864eee/534ca12f-53ce-4491-8fa5-1605c5864eee.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In his interview with the DOJ Office of the Inspector General, Alex Acosta repeatedly framed the 2007–2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement as a constrained, pragmatic decision made under pressure rather than a deliberate act of favoritism. He told...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In his interview with the DOJ Office of the Inspector General, Alex Acosta repeatedly framed the 2007–2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement as a constrained, pragmatic decision made under pressure rather than a deliberate act of favoritism. He told inspectors that Epstein’s defense team, stacked with politically connected and aggressive lawyers, created what he described as a credible threat of a federal indictment collapse if prosecutors pushed too hard. Acosta emphasized that his office believed securing some conviction at the state level was better than risking none at all, and he claimed he was focused on avoiding a scenario where Epstein walked entirely. Throughout the interview, Acosta leaned heavily on the idea that the deal was the product of risk assessment, limited evidence, and internal prosecutorial judgment rather than corruption or improper influence, repeatedly asserting that he acted in good faith.<br /><br /><br />At the same time, the OIG interview exposed glaring gaps and evasions in Acosta’s account, particularly regarding victims’ rights and transparency. He acknowledged that victims were not informed about the existence or finalization of the NPA, but attempted to downplay this as a procedural failure rather than a substantive violation of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act. Acosta also distanced himself from the unusual secrecy of the agreement, suggesting that others in his office handled victim communications and specific drafting decisions. Most damaging, however, was his inability to offer a coherent justification for why Epstein received terms so extraordinary that they effectively shut down federal accountability altogether. The interview left the unmistakable impression of a former U.S. Attorney attempting to launder an indefensible outcome through bureaucratic language, while avoiding responsibility for a deal that insulated Epstein and his network from meaningful scrutiny for more than a decade.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%207/EFTA00009229.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00009229.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2642</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Alex Acosta And His Epstein Interview With OIG Inspectors (Part 4-6) (6/22/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-alex-acosta-and-his-epstein-interview-with-oig-inspectors-part-4-6-6-22-26--72635551</link><description><![CDATA[In his interview with the DOJ Office of the Inspector General, Alex Acosta repeatedly framed the 2007–2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement as a constrained, pragmatic decision made under pressure rather than a deliberate act of favoritism. He told inspectors that Epstein’s defense team, stacked with politically connected and aggressive lawyers, created what he described as a credible threat of a federal indictment collapse if prosecutors pushed too hard. Acosta emphasized that his office believed securing some conviction at the state level was better than risking none at all, and he claimed he was focused on avoiding a scenario where Epstein walked entirely. Throughout the interview, Acosta leaned heavily on the idea that the deal was the product of risk assessment, limited evidence, and internal prosecutorial judgment rather than corruption or improper influence, repeatedly asserting that he acted in good faith.<br /><br /><br />At the same time, the OIG interview exposed glaring gaps and evasions in Acosta’s account, particularly regarding victims’ rights and transparency. He acknowledged that victims were not informed about the existence or finalization of the NPA, but attempted to downplay this as a procedural failure rather than a substantive violation of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act. Acosta also distanced himself from the unusual secrecy of the agreement, suggesting that others in his office handled victim communications and specific drafting decisions. Most damaging, however, was his inability to offer a coherent justification for why Epstein received terms so extraordinary that they effectively shut down federal accountability altogether. The interview left the unmistakable impression of a former U.S. Attorney attempting to launder an indefensible outcome through bureaucratic language, while avoiding responsibility for a deal that insulated Epstein and his network from meaningful scrutiny for more than a decade.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%207/EFTA00009229.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00009229.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72635551</guid><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 08:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72635551/megaacostaoig4n5n6.mp3" length="34492543" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a3dd5256-8278-4dd9-9850-8afbec4e8647/a3dd5256-8278-4dd9-9850-8afbec4e8647.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a3dd5256-8278-4dd9-9850-8afbec4e8647/a3dd5256-8278-4dd9-9850-8afbec4e8647.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a3dd5256-8278-4dd9-9850-8afbec4e8647/a3dd5256-8278-4dd9-9850-8afbec4e8647.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In his interview with the DOJ Office of the Inspector General, Alex Acosta repeatedly framed the 2007–2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement as a constrained, pragmatic decision made under pressure rather than a deliberate act of favoritism. He told...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In his interview with the DOJ Office of the Inspector General, Alex Acosta repeatedly framed the 2007–2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement as a constrained, pragmatic decision made under pressure rather than a deliberate act of favoritism. He told inspectors that Epstein’s defense team, stacked with politically connected and aggressive lawyers, created what he described as a credible threat of a federal indictment collapse if prosecutors pushed too hard. Acosta emphasized that his office believed securing some conviction at the state level was better than risking none at all, and he claimed he was focused on avoiding a scenario where Epstein walked entirely. Throughout the interview, Acosta leaned heavily on the idea that the deal was the product of risk assessment, limited evidence, and internal prosecutorial judgment rather than corruption or improper influence, repeatedly asserting that he acted in good faith.<br /><br /><br />At the same time, the OIG interview exposed glaring gaps and evasions in Acosta’s account, particularly regarding victims’ rights and transparency. He acknowledged that victims were not informed about the existence or finalization of the NPA, but attempted to downplay this as a procedural failure rather than a substantive violation of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act. Acosta also distanced himself from the unusual secrecy of the agreement, suggesting that others in his office handled victim communications and specific drafting decisions. Most damaging, however, was his inability to offer a coherent justification for why Epstein received terms so extraordinary that they effectively shut down federal accountability altogether. The interview left the unmistakable impression of a former U.S. Attorney attempting to launder an indefensible outcome through bureaucratic language, while avoiding responsibility for a deal that insulated Epstein and his network from meaningful scrutiny for more than a decade.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%207/EFTA00009229.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00009229.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2156</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Alex Acosta And His Epstein Interview With OIG Inspectors (Part 1-3) (6/22/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-alex-acosta-and-his-epstein-interview-with-oig-inspectors-part-1-3-6-22-26--72635553</link><description><![CDATA[In his interview with the DOJ Office of the Inspector General, Alex Acosta repeatedly framed the 2007–2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement as a constrained, pragmatic decision made under pressure rather than a deliberate act of favoritism. He told inspectors that Epstein’s defense team, stacked with politically connected and aggressive lawyers, created what he described as a credible threat of a federal indictment collapse if prosecutors pushed too hard. Acosta emphasized that his office believed securing some conviction at the state level was better than risking none at all, and he claimed he was focused on avoiding a scenario where Epstein walked entirely. Throughout the interview, Acosta leaned heavily on the idea that the deal was the product of risk assessment, limited evidence, and internal prosecutorial judgment rather than corruption or improper influence, repeatedly asserting that he acted in good faith.<br /><br /><br />At the same time, the OIG interview exposed glaring gaps and evasions in Acosta’s account, particularly regarding victims’ rights and transparency. He acknowledged that victims were not informed about the existence or finalization of the NPA, but attempted to downplay this as a procedural failure rather than a substantive violation of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act. Acosta also distanced himself from the unusual secrecy of the agreement, suggesting that others in his office handled victim communications and specific drafting decisions. Most damaging, however, was his inability to offer a coherent justification for why Epstein received terms so extraordinary that they effectively shut down federal accountability altogether. The interview left the unmistakable impression of a former U.S. Attorney attempting to launder an indefensible outcome through bureaucratic language, while avoiding responsibility for a deal that insulated Epstein and his network from meaningful scrutiny for more than a decade.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%207/EFTA00009229.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00009229.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72635553</guid><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 06:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72635553/megaacostaoig1n2n3.mp3" length="38619054" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a990bc9c-de2d-4799-b97d-9023fa9789da/a990bc9c-de2d-4799-b97d-9023fa9789da.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a990bc9c-de2d-4799-b97d-9023fa9789da/a990bc9c-de2d-4799-b97d-9023fa9789da.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a990bc9c-de2d-4799-b97d-9023fa9789da/a990bc9c-de2d-4799-b97d-9023fa9789da.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In his interview with the DOJ Office of the Inspector General, Alex Acosta repeatedly framed the 2007–2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement as a constrained, pragmatic decision made under pressure rather than a deliberate act of favoritism. He told...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In his interview with the DOJ Office of the Inspector General, Alex Acosta repeatedly framed the 2007–2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement as a constrained, pragmatic decision made under pressure rather than a deliberate act of favoritism. He told inspectors that Epstein’s defense team, stacked with politically connected and aggressive lawyers, created what he described as a credible threat of a federal indictment collapse if prosecutors pushed too hard. Acosta emphasized that his office believed securing some conviction at the state level was better than risking none at all, and he claimed he was focused on avoiding a scenario where Epstein walked entirely. Throughout the interview, Acosta leaned heavily on the idea that the deal was the product of risk assessment, limited evidence, and internal prosecutorial judgment rather than corruption or improper influence, repeatedly asserting that he acted in good faith.<br /><br /><br />At the same time, the OIG interview exposed glaring gaps and evasions in Acosta’s account, particularly regarding victims’ rights and transparency. He acknowledged that victims were not informed about the existence or finalization of the NPA, but attempted to downplay this as a procedural failure rather than a substantive violation of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act. Acosta also distanced himself from the unusual secrecy of the agreement, suggesting that others in his office handled victim communications and specific drafting decisions. Most damaging, however, was his inability to offer a coherent justification for why Epstein received terms so extraordinary that they effectively shut down federal accountability altogether. The interview left the unmistakable impression of a former U.S. Attorney attempting to launder an indefensible outcome through bureaucratic language, while avoiding responsibility for a deal that insulated Epstein and his network from meaningful scrutiny for more than a decade.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%207/EFTA00009229.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00009229.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2414</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Jennifer Araoz And Her Lawsuit Filed  Against The Jeffrey Epstein Estate (Part 4)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/jennifer-araoz-and-her-lawsuit-filed-against-the-jeffrey-epstein-estate-part-4--72604375</link><description><![CDATA[Jennifer Araoz filed a lawsuit against the Epstein Estate, alleging she was groomed and sexually assaulted by Jeffrey Epstein when she was a teenager. The lawsuit claims that Araoz was recruited outside her New York City high school by Epstein’s associates, who promised career opportunities and financial support. Over time, Epstein allegedly coerced her into repeated sexual encounters, culminating in a rape at his Manhattan townhouse when she was just 15 years old. Araoz contends that Epstein’s vast network of accomplices played an active role in enabling the abuse by fostering an environment of manipulation and control.<br /><br /><br />The lawsuit not only targets Epstein’s estate but also implicates other individuals and entities that Araoz claims facilitated his criminal activities. Seeking both justice and compensation, Araoz’s suit is part of a broader legal effort by Epstein’s survivors to hold those connected to his network accountable. The case underscores the alleged systemic nature of Epstein’s operations, highlighting the complicity of those who worked with him to sustain his predatory behavior.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.vicourts.org/common/pages/DisplayFile.aspx?itemId=16191993" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jeffrey Epstein ST-19-PB-80 Additional filings (003).pdf (vicourts.org)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72604375</guid><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 04:15:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72604375/araoz4.mp3" length="13093450" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9d6471fb-8705-4c71-b8f6-e9111eaaa1cc/9d6471fb-8705-4c71-b8f6-e9111eaaa1cc.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9d6471fb-8705-4c71-b8f6-e9111eaaa1cc/9d6471fb-8705-4c71-b8f6-e9111eaaa1cc.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9d6471fb-8705-4c71-b8f6-e9111eaaa1cc/9d6471fb-8705-4c71-b8f6-e9111eaaa1cc.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jennifer Araoz filed a lawsuit against the Epstein Estate, alleging she was groomed and sexually assaulted by Jeffrey Epstein when she was a teenager. The lawsuit claims that Araoz was recruited outside her New York City high school by Epstein’s...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jennifer Araoz filed a lawsuit against the Epstein Estate, alleging she was groomed and sexually assaulted by Jeffrey Epstein when she was a teenager. The lawsuit claims that Araoz was recruited outside her New York City high school by Epstein’s associates, who promised career opportunities and financial support. Over time, Epstein allegedly coerced her into repeated sexual encounters, culminating in a rape at his Manhattan townhouse when she was just 15 years old. Araoz contends that Epstein’s vast network of accomplices played an active role in enabling the abuse by fostering an environment of manipulation and control.<br /><br /><br />The lawsuit not only targets Epstein’s estate but also implicates other individuals and entities that Araoz claims facilitated his criminal activities. Seeking both justice and compensation, Araoz’s suit is part of a broader legal effort by Epstein’s survivors to hold those connected to his network accountable. The case underscores the alleged systemic nature of Epstein’s operations, highlighting the complicity of those who worked with him to sustain his predatory behavior.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.vicourts.org/common/pages/DisplayFile.aspx?itemId=16191993" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jeffrey Epstein ST-19-PB-80 Additional filings (003).pdf (vicourts.org)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>819</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Jennifer Araoz And Her Lawsuit Filed  Against The Jeffrey Epstein Estate (Part 3)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/jennifer-araoz-and-her-lawsuit-filed-against-the-jeffrey-epstein-estate-part-3--72604376</link><description><![CDATA[Jennifer Araoz filed a lawsuit against the Epstein Estate, alleging she was groomed and sexually assaulted by Jeffrey Epstein when she was a teenager. The lawsuit claims that Araoz was recruited outside her New York City high school by Epstein’s associates, who promised career opportunities and financial support. Over time, Epstein allegedly coerced her into repeated sexual encounters, culminating in a rape at his Manhattan townhouse when she was just 15 years old. Araoz contends that Epstein’s vast network of accomplices played an active role in enabling the abuse by fostering an environment of manipulation and control.<br /><br /><br />The lawsuit not only targets Epstein’s estate but also implicates other individuals and entities that Araoz claims facilitated his criminal activities. Seeking both justice and compensation, Araoz’s suit is part of a broader legal effort by Epstein’s survivors to hold those connected to his network accountable. The case underscores the alleged systemic nature of Epstein’s operations, highlighting the complicity of those who worked with him to sustain his predatory behavior.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.vicourts.org/common/pages/DisplayFile.aspx?itemId=16191993" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jeffrey Epstein ST-19-PB-80 Additional filings (003).pdf (vicourts.org)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72604376</guid><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 02:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72604376/araoz3.mp3" length="10980248" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ab2b31e2-695e-4ae5-b79d-cfeb658708b2/ab2b31e2-695e-4ae5-b79d-cfeb658708b2.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ab2b31e2-695e-4ae5-b79d-cfeb658708b2/ab2b31e2-695e-4ae5-b79d-cfeb658708b2.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ab2b31e2-695e-4ae5-b79d-cfeb658708b2/ab2b31e2-695e-4ae5-b79d-cfeb658708b2.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jennifer Araoz filed a lawsuit against the Epstein Estate, alleging she was groomed and sexually assaulted by Jeffrey Epstein when she was a teenager. The lawsuit claims that Araoz was recruited outside her New York City high school by Epstein’s...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jennifer Araoz filed a lawsuit against the Epstein Estate, alleging she was groomed and sexually assaulted by Jeffrey Epstein when she was a teenager. The lawsuit claims that Araoz was recruited outside her New York City high school by Epstein’s associates, who promised career opportunities and financial support. Over time, Epstein allegedly coerced her into repeated sexual encounters, culminating in a rape at his Manhattan townhouse when she was just 15 years old. Araoz contends that Epstein’s vast network of accomplices played an active role in enabling the abuse by fostering an environment of manipulation and control.<br /><br /><br />The lawsuit not only targets Epstein’s estate but also implicates other individuals and entities that Araoz claims facilitated his criminal activities. Seeking both justice and compensation, Araoz’s suit is part of a broader legal effort by Epstein’s survivors to hold those connected to his network accountable. The case underscores the alleged systemic nature of Epstein’s operations, highlighting the complicity of those who worked with him to sustain his predatory behavior.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.vicourts.org/common/pages/DisplayFile.aspx?itemId=16191993" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jeffrey Epstein ST-19-PB-80 Additional filings (003).pdf (vicourts.org)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>687</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Jennifer Araoz And Her Lawsuit Filed  Against The Jeffrey Epstein Estate (Part 2)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/jennifer-araoz-and-her-lawsuit-filed-against-the-jeffrey-epstein-estate-part-2--72604372</link><description><![CDATA[Jennifer Araoz filed a lawsuit against the Epstein Estate, alleging she was groomed and sexually assaulted by Jeffrey Epstein when she was a teenager. The lawsuit claims that Araoz was recruited outside her New York City high school by Epstein’s associates, who promised career opportunities and financial support. Over time, Epstein allegedly coerced her into repeated sexual encounters, culminating in a rape at his Manhattan townhouse when she was just 15 years old. Araoz contends that Epstein’s vast network of accomplices played an active role in enabling the abuse by fostering an environment of manipulation and control.<br /><br /><br />The lawsuit not only targets Epstein’s estate but also implicates other individuals and entities that Araoz claims facilitated his criminal activities. Seeking both justice and compensation, Araoz’s suit is part of a broader legal effort by Epstein’s survivors to hold those connected to his network accountable. The case underscores the alleged systemic nature of Epstein’s operations, highlighting the complicity of those who worked with him to sustain his predatory behavior.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.vicourts.org/common/pages/DisplayFile.aspx?itemId=16191993" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jeffrey Epstein ST-19-PB-80 Additional filings (003).pdf (vicourts.org)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72604372</guid><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 00:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72604372/araoz2.mp3" length="11636444" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2f809ee5-f249-4b5e-8a16-260137393173/2f809ee5-f249-4b5e-8a16-260137393173.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2f809ee5-f249-4b5e-8a16-260137393173/2f809ee5-f249-4b5e-8a16-260137393173.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2f809ee5-f249-4b5e-8a16-260137393173/2f809ee5-f249-4b5e-8a16-260137393173.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jennifer Araoz filed a lawsuit against the Epstein Estate, alleging she was groomed and sexually assaulted by Jeffrey Epstein when she was a teenager. The lawsuit claims that Araoz was recruited outside her New York City high school by Epstein’s...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jennifer Araoz filed a lawsuit against the Epstein Estate, alleging she was groomed and sexually assaulted by Jeffrey Epstein when she was a teenager. The lawsuit claims that Araoz was recruited outside her New York City high school by Epstein’s associates, who promised career opportunities and financial support. Over time, Epstein allegedly coerced her into repeated sexual encounters, culminating in a rape at his Manhattan townhouse when she was just 15 years old. Araoz contends that Epstein’s vast network of accomplices played an active role in enabling the abuse by fostering an environment of manipulation and control.<br /><br /><br />The lawsuit not only targets Epstein’s estate but also implicates other individuals and entities that Araoz claims facilitated his criminal activities. Seeking both justice and compensation, Araoz’s suit is part of a broader legal effort by Epstein’s survivors to hold those connected to his network accountable. The case underscores the alleged systemic nature of Epstein’s operations, highlighting the complicity of those who worked with him to sustain his predatory behavior.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.vicourts.org/common/pages/DisplayFile.aspx?itemId=16191993" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jeffrey Epstein ST-19-PB-80 Additional filings (003).pdf (vicourts.org)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>728</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Jennifer Araoz And Her Lawsuit Filed  Against The Jeffrey Epstein Estate (Part 1)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/jennifer-araoz-and-her-lawsuit-filed-against-the-jeffrey-epstein-estate-part-1--72604377</link><description><![CDATA[Jennifer Araoz filed a lawsuit against the Epstein Estate, alleging she was groomed and sexually assaulted by Jeffrey Epstein when she was a teenager. The lawsuit claims that Araoz was recruited outside her New York City high school by Epstein’s associates, who promised career opportunities and financial support. Over time, Epstein allegedly coerced her into repeated sexual encounters, culminating in a rape at his Manhattan townhouse when she was just 15 years old. Araoz contends that Epstein’s vast network of accomplices played an active role in enabling the abuse by fostering an environment of manipulation and control.<br /><br /><br />The lawsuit not only targets Epstein’s estate but also implicates other individuals and entities that Araoz claims facilitated his criminal activities. Seeking both justice and compensation, Araoz’s suit is part of a broader legal effort by Epstein’s survivors to hold those connected to his network accountable. The case underscores the alleged systemic nature of Epstein’s operations, highlighting the complicity of those who worked with him to sustain his predatory behavior.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.vicourts.org/common/pages/DisplayFile.aspx?itemId=16191993" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jeffrey Epstein ST-19-PB-80 Additional filings (003).pdf (vicourts.org)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72604377</guid><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 22:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72604377/araoz1.mp3" length="10559781" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6c50dee3-2da3-4c5b-96db-b37d0747c5e5/6c50dee3-2da3-4c5b-96db-b37d0747c5e5.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6c50dee3-2da3-4c5b-96db-b37d0747c5e5/6c50dee3-2da3-4c5b-96db-b37d0747c5e5.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6c50dee3-2da3-4c5b-96db-b37d0747c5e5/6c50dee3-2da3-4c5b-96db-b37d0747c5e5.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jennifer Araoz filed a lawsuit against the Epstein Estate, alleging she was groomed and sexually assaulted by Jeffrey Epstein when she was a teenager. The lawsuit claims that Araoz was recruited outside her New York City high school by Epstein’s...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jennifer Araoz filed a lawsuit against the Epstein Estate, alleging she was groomed and sexually assaulted by Jeffrey Epstein when she was a teenager. The lawsuit claims that Araoz was recruited outside her New York City high school by Epstein’s associates, who promised career opportunities and financial support. Over time, Epstein allegedly coerced her into repeated sexual encounters, culminating in a rape at his Manhattan townhouse when she was just 15 years old. Araoz contends that Epstein’s vast network of accomplices played an active role in enabling the abuse by fostering an environment of manipulation and control.<br /><br /><br />The lawsuit not only targets Epstein’s estate but also implicates other individuals and entities that Araoz claims facilitated his criminal activities. Seeking both justice and compensation, Araoz’s suit is part of a broader legal effort by Epstein’s survivors to hold those connected to his network accountable. The case underscores the alleged systemic nature of Epstein’s operations, highlighting the complicity of those who worked with him to sustain his predatory behavior.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.vicourts.org/common/pages/DisplayFile.aspx?itemId=16191993" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jeffrey Epstein ST-19-PB-80 Additional filings (003).pdf (vicourts.org)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>660</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Tova Noel And The Transcript From Her Congressional Testimony (Part 5) (6/22/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/tova-noel-and-the-transcript-from-her-congressional-testimony-part-5-6-22-26--72631434</link><description><![CDATA[Tova Noel, one of the two correctional officers assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center’s Special Housing Unit on the night Jeffrey Epstein died, told the House Oversight Committee that she failed to conduct the required inmate checks and later signed records falsely indicating that the rounds had been completed. Noel described an understaffed, poorly managed facility in which she was exhausted, inadequately trained and assigned duties beyond her normal responsibilities. She maintained that she last saw Epstein alive during the evening medication round and observed nothing that made her believe he was preparing to harm himself. Noel also testified that Epstein received unusual accommodations, including extra bed linens, a CPAP machine and access to medication that appeared different from the treatment ordinarily given to other prisoners.<br /><br />Noel denied having any role in Epstein’s death, receiving money in connection with him or knowing anything about an alleged payment to facilitate access to his cell. She also rejected claims that she was the unidentified orange-colored figure seen moving toward Epstein’s tier at approximately 10:39 p.m., insisting that she never returned to the area and could not explain what—or who—the surveillance image showed. Although Noel said she believed Epstein died by suicide because he was supposedly alone inside the cell, her testimony did little to resolve the most important unanswered questions: why required checks were abandoned, why Epstein remained without a cellmate, who or what appeared near the tier, and how so many security procedures failed simultaneously. Instead, her account reinforced the picture of extraordinary negligence, special treatment and institutional dysfunction surrounding the death of the most consequential prisoner in federal custody.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72631434</guid><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 20:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72631434/tovanoelcongresstranscript5.mp3" length="12112501" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/dcfcaebb-4a11-47b8-baa7-845df0b6f719/dcfcaebb-4a11-47b8-baa7-845df0b6f719.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/dcfcaebb-4a11-47b8-baa7-845df0b6f719/dcfcaebb-4a11-47b8-baa7-845df0b6f719.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/dcfcaebb-4a11-47b8-baa7-845df0b6f719/dcfcaebb-4a11-47b8-baa7-845df0b6f719.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Tova Noel, one of the two correctional officers assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center’s Special Housing Unit on the night Jeffrey Epstein died, told the House Oversight Committee that she failed to conduct the required inmate checks and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Tova Noel, one of the two correctional officers assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center’s Special Housing Unit on the night Jeffrey Epstein died, told the House Oversight Committee that she failed to conduct the required inmate checks and later signed records falsely indicating that the rounds had been completed. Noel described an understaffed, poorly managed facility in which she was exhausted, inadequately trained and assigned duties beyond her normal responsibilities. She maintained that she last saw Epstein alive during the evening medication round and observed nothing that made her believe he was preparing to harm himself. Noel also testified that Epstein received unusual accommodations, including extra bed linens, a CPAP machine and access to medication that appeared different from the treatment ordinarily given to other prisoners.<br /><br />Noel denied having any role in Epstein’s death, receiving money in connection with him or knowing anything about an alleged payment to facilitate access to his cell. She also rejected claims that she was the unidentified orange-colored figure seen moving toward Epstein’s tier at approximately 10:39 p.m., insisting that she never returned to the area and could not explain what—or who—the surveillance image showed. Although Noel said she believed Epstein died by suicide because he was supposedly alone inside the cell, her testimony did little to resolve the most important unanswered questions: why required checks were abandoned, why Epstein remained without a cellmate, who or what appeared near the tier, and how so many security procedures failed simultaneously. Instead, her account reinforced the picture of extraordinary negligence, special treatment and institutional dysfunction surrounding the death of the most consequential prisoner in federal custody.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>758</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Tova Noel And The Transcript From Her Congressional Testimony (Part 4) (6/22/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/tova-noel-and-the-transcript-from-her-congressional-testimony-part-4-6-22-26--72631435</link><description><![CDATA[Tova Noel, one of the two correctional officers assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center’s Special Housing Unit on the night Jeffrey Epstein died, told the House Oversight Committee that she failed to conduct the required inmate checks and later signed records falsely indicating that the rounds had been completed. Noel described an understaffed, poorly managed facility in which she was exhausted, inadequately trained and assigned duties beyond her normal responsibilities. She maintained that she last saw Epstein alive during the evening medication round and observed nothing that made her believe he was preparing to harm himself. Noel also testified that Epstein received unusual accommodations, including extra bed linens, a CPAP machine and access to medication that appeared different from the treatment ordinarily given to other prisoners.<br /><br />Noel denied having any role in Epstein’s death, receiving money in connection with him or knowing anything about an alleged payment to facilitate access to his cell. She also rejected claims that she was the unidentified orange-colored figure seen moving toward Epstein’s tier at approximately 10:39 p.m., insisting that she never returned to the area and could not explain what—or who—the surveillance image showed. Although Noel said she believed Epstein died by suicide because he was supposedly alone inside the cell, her testimony did little to resolve the most important unanswered questions: why required checks were abandoned, why Epstein remained without a cellmate, who or what appeared near the tier, and how so many security procedures failed simultaneously. Instead, her account reinforced the picture of extraordinary negligence, special treatment and institutional dysfunction surrounding the death of the most consequential prisoner in federal custody.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72631435</guid><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 18:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72631435/tovanoeltranscript4.mp3" length="11627250" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/28c46c7b-917c-48d9-bd11-0a22551ea1b3/28c46c7b-917c-48d9-bd11-0a22551ea1b3.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/28c46c7b-917c-48d9-bd11-0a22551ea1b3/28c46c7b-917c-48d9-bd11-0a22551ea1b3.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/28c46c7b-917c-48d9-bd11-0a22551ea1b3/28c46c7b-917c-48d9-bd11-0a22551ea1b3.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Tova Noel, one of the two correctional officers assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center’s Special Housing Unit on the night Jeffrey Epstein died, told the House Oversight Committee that she failed to conduct the required inmate checks and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Tova Noel, one of the two correctional officers assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center’s Special Housing Unit on the night Jeffrey Epstein died, told the House Oversight Committee that she failed to conduct the required inmate checks and later signed records falsely indicating that the rounds had been completed. Noel described an understaffed, poorly managed facility in which she was exhausted, inadequately trained and assigned duties beyond her normal responsibilities. She maintained that she last saw Epstein alive during the evening medication round and observed nothing that made her believe he was preparing to harm himself. Noel also testified that Epstein received unusual accommodations, including extra bed linens, a CPAP machine and access to medication that appeared different from the treatment ordinarily given to other prisoners.<br /><br />Noel denied having any role in Epstein’s death, receiving money in connection with him or knowing anything about an alleged payment to facilitate access to his cell. She also rejected claims that she was the unidentified orange-colored figure seen moving toward Epstein’s tier at approximately 10:39 p.m., insisting that she never returned to the area and could not explain what—or who—the surveillance image showed. Although Noel said she believed Epstein died by suicide because he was supposedly alone inside the cell, her testimony did little to resolve the most important unanswered questions: why required checks were abandoned, why Epstein remained without a cellmate, who or what appeared near the tier, and how so many security procedures failed simultaneously. Instead, her account reinforced the picture of extraordinary negligence, special treatment and institutional dysfunction surrounding the death of the most consequential prisoner in federal custody.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>727</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Three Million Epstein Related Pages Released—and Millions Still Withheld (6/22/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/three-million-epstein-related-pages-released-and-millions-still-withheld-6-22-26--72631264</link><description><![CDATA[CBS News found that the Justice Department’s massive Epstein-file release still leaves major holes in the public record. Although the DOJ said it collected more than six million pages, it released only about three million, claiming the remainder consisted of duplicates, unrelated material or legally protected records. The files that were published also contain questionable redactions, including the names and images of prominent Epstein contacts even though the disclosure law specifically barred officials from withholding information merely to prevent political embarrassment or reputational damage. Some redactions were quietly removed only after CBS News questioned the department, while thousands of older emails, email attachments, internal FBI communications and records from Epstein’s earliest accounts remain absent or difficult to trace.<br /><br />The missing material extends into some of the most important unresolved areas of the Epstein investigation. CBS News could not locate substantial records connected to a DEA money-laundering investigation, earlier federal inquiries, massage scheduling, encrypted Signal messages, suspicious financial transactions and missing FBI interview reports. More than 70 percent of the documents listed in an index used during Ghislaine Maxwell’s criminal case could not be found under their original identification numbers, and prison footage from 147 cameras—along with video from the night of Epstein’s first reported jail incident—was not released. The continuing gaps have prompted a Government Accountability Office investigation, congressional scrutiny and litigation seeking clearer explanations for the redactions and the release of additional documents<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/epstein-files-whats-missing/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">What's missing from the Epstein files? Questions persist about unexplained redactions, missing documents, email gaps - CBS News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72631264</guid><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 16:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72631264/missingfromepsteinfiles.mp3" length="26578068" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b8891136-21bb-42ac-9139-dcec46807c91/b8891136-21bb-42ac-9139-dcec46807c91.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b8891136-21bb-42ac-9139-dcec46807c91/b8891136-21bb-42ac-9139-dcec46807c91.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b8891136-21bb-42ac-9139-dcec46807c91/b8891136-21bb-42ac-9139-dcec46807c91.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>CBS News found that the Justice Department’s massive Epstein-file release still leaves major holes in the public record. Although the DOJ said it collected more than six million pages, it released only about three million, claiming the remainder...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[CBS News found that the Justice Department’s massive Epstein-file release still leaves major holes in the public record. Although the DOJ said it collected more than six million pages, it released only about three million, claiming the remainder consisted of duplicates, unrelated material or legally protected records. The files that were published also contain questionable redactions, including the names and images of prominent Epstein contacts even though the disclosure law specifically barred officials from withholding information merely to prevent political embarrassment or reputational damage. Some redactions were quietly removed only after CBS News questioned the department, while thousands of older emails, email attachments, internal FBI communications and records from Epstein’s earliest accounts remain absent or difficult to trace.<br /><br />The missing material extends into some of the most important unresolved areas of the Epstein investigation. CBS News could not locate substantial records connected to a DEA money-laundering investigation, earlier federal inquiries, massage scheduling, encrypted Signal messages, suspicious financial transactions and missing FBI interview reports. More than 70 percent of the documents listed in an index used during Ghislaine Maxwell’s criminal case could not be found under their original identification numbers, and prison footage from 147 cameras—along with video from the night of Epstein’s first reported jail incident—was not released. The continuing gaps have prompted a Government Accountability Office investigation, congressional scrutiny and litigation seeking clearer explanations for the redactions and the release of additional documents<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/epstein-files-whats-missing/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">What's missing from the Epstein files? Questions persist about unexplained redactions, missing documents, email gaps - CBS News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1662</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>A Sitting President, an Alleged Forgery, and No Investigation (6/22/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/a-sitting-president-an-alleged-forgery-and-no-investigation-6-22-26--72631237</link><description><![CDATA[If the birthday message attributed to Donald Trump was truly forged, the absence of a publicly announced investigation into who created it is difficult to explain. Fabricating evidence to connect a sitting president to Jeffrey Epstein would be an extraordinary act with potentially serious criminal, political, and national-security implications. Investigators could examine the album’s chain of custody, test the paper and ink, compare the signature with authenticated examples, and interview the people who assembled and preserved the birthday book. Instead, Trump and the White House have focused primarily on denouncing the document and suing The Wall Street Journal. That approach attacks the publisher without identifying the alleged forger or establishing how a fraudulent page supposedly entered a private album assembled in 2003.<br /><br />This does not prove that Trump wrote the message, but it creates a legitimate credibility problem for his denial. A defamation lawsuit can impose costs, create delays, intimidate further reporting, and keep the dispute framed around media conduct rather than the document’s authenticity. A real forgery investigation would be harder to control and could either vindicate Trump or produce evidence contradicting him. Given Trump’s documented social relationship with Epstein during the relevant period, the existence of a birthday contribution is not inherently implausible. Until the administration demands an independent forensic examination and explains who supposedly forged the message, the suspicion will remain that the lawsuit was intended less to uncover the truth than to slow the release of damaging information and create enough doubt to protect Trump politically.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72631237</guid><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 14:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72631237/trumpepsteinbirthdayforgeryorreal.mp3" length="14502391" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/65125cb1-8125-40d4-b3a0-01e78abe076d/65125cb1-8125-40d4-b3a0-01e78abe076d.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/65125cb1-8125-40d4-b3a0-01e78abe076d/65125cb1-8125-40d4-b3a0-01e78abe076d.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/65125cb1-8125-40d4-b3a0-01e78abe076d/65125cb1-8125-40d4-b3a0-01e78abe076d.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>If the birthday message attributed to Donald Trump was truly forged, the absence of a publicly announced investigation into who created it is difficult to explain. Fabricating evidence to connect a sitting president to Jeffrey Epstein would be an...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[If the birthday message attributed to Donald Trump was truly forged, the absence of a publicly announced investigation into who created it is difficult to explain. Fabricating evidence to connect a sitting president to Jeffrey Epstein would be an extraordinary act with potentially serious criminal, political, and national-security implications. Investigators could examine the album’s chain of custody, test the paper and ink, compare the signature with authenticated examples, and interview the people who assembled and preserved the birthday book. Instead, Trump and the White House have focused primarily on denouncing the document and suing The Wall Street Journal. That approach attacks the publisher without identifying the alleged forger or establishing how a fraudulent page supposedly entered a private album assembled in 2003.<br /><br />This does not prove that Trump wrote the message, but it creates a legitimate credibility problem for his denial. A defamation lawsuit can impose costs, create delays, intimidate further reporting, and keep the dispute framed around media conduct rather than the document’s authenticity. A real forgery investigation would be harder to control and could either vindicate Trump or produce evidence contradicting him. Given Trump’s documented social relationship with Epstein during the relevant period, the existence of a birthday contribution is not inherently implausible. Until the administration demands an independent forensic examination and explains who supposedly forged the message, the suspicion will remain that the lawsuit was intended less to uncover the truth than to slow the release of damaging information and create enough doubt to protect Trump politically.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>907</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Harvard and Bard Face New Questions Over Jeffrey Epstein (6/22/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/harvard-and-bard-face-new-questions-over-jeffrey-epstein-6-22-26--72631250</link><description><![CDATA[Harvard University and Bard College are facing renewed congressional scrutiny over whether their relationships with Jeffrey Epstein helped him rebuild his reputation and maintain access to elite academic circles after his criminal conduct was known. Representative Jamie Raskin, the ranking Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, is demanding a fuller accounting from both schools, arguing that their previous internal investigations were incomplete or misleading. He is seeking records involving Epstein’s donations, research funding, faculty relationships, admissions activity and institutional decision-making. At Harvard, the inquiry focuses partly on donations made after the university said it had stopped accepting Epstein’s money, as well as his extensive contacts with former Harvard president Larry Summers and other academics. Epstein gave more than $9 million to Harvard and affiliated programs between 1998 and 2008.<br /><br /><br />Bard is also being pressed to make outgoing president Leon Botstein available for a transcribed interview and to release the full findings of its investigation into his dealings with Epstein. Bard’s independent review found no illegal conduct by Botstein, but concluded that he was not fully candid about the relationship, failed to recognize the risks Epstein posed to the college and its students, and did not disclose consulting fees received from an Epstein-controlled entity. Raskin cited evidence suggesting Epstein used his higher-education connections not only to rehabilitate himself socially but potentially to maintain and expand his exploitation of women. Harvard and Bard were asked to provide the requested information by July 1, as lawmakers seek to determine how prestigious institutions continued granting Epstein credibility, access and influence.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/17/harvard-bard-college-jeffrey-epstein" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Harvard and Bard face fresh questions from lawmakers over ties to Epstein | Jeffrey Epstein | The Guardian</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72631250</guid><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 12:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72631250/harvardbardepstein.mp3" length="14425905" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7f50b6b3-9a99-4d11-9218-38b46dcce371/7f50b6b3-9a99-4d11-9218-38b46dcce371.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7f50b6b3-9a99-4d11-9218-38b46dcce371/7f50b6b3-9a99-4d11-9218-38b46dcce371.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7f50b6b3-9a99-4d11-9218-38b46dcce371/7f50b6b3-9a99-4d11-9218-38b46dcce371.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Harvard University and Bard College are facing renewed congressional scrutiny over whether their relationships with Jeffrey Epstein helped him rebuild his reputation and maintain access to elite academic circles after his criminal conduct was known....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Harvard University and Bard College are facing renewed congressional scrutiny over whether their relationships with Jeffrey Epstein helped him rebuild his reputation and maintain access to elite academic circles after his criminal conduct was known. Representative Jamie Raskin, the ranking Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, is demanding a fuller accounting from both schools, arguing that their previous internal investigations were incomplete or misleading. He is seeking records involving Epstein’s donations, research funding, faculty relationships, admissions activity and institutional decision-making. At Harvard, the inquiry focuses partly on donations made after the university said it had stopped accepting Epstein’s money, as well as his extensive contacts with former Harvard president Larry Summers and other academics. Epstein gave more than $9 million to Harvard and affiliated programs between 1998 and 2008.<br /><br /><br />Bard is also being pressed to make outgoing president Leon Botstein available for a transcribed interview and to release the full findings of its investigation into his dealings with Epstein. Bard’s independent review found no illegal conduct by Botstein, but concluded that he was not fully candid about the relationship, failed to recognize the risks Epstein posed to the college and its students, and did not disclose consulting fees received from an Epstein-controlled entity. Raskin cited evidence suggesting Epstein used his higher-education connections not only to rehabilitate himself socially but potentially to maintain and expand his exploitation of women. Harvard and Bard were asked to provide the requested information by July 1, as lawmakers seek to determine how prestigious institutions continued granting Epstein credibility, access and influence.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/17/harvard-bard-college-jeffrey-epstein" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Harvard and Bard face fresh questions from lawmakers over ties to Epstein | Jeffrey Epstein | The Guardian</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>902</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Jeffrey Epstein's Survivor And Their Press Conference At Capitol Hill (6/22/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-s-survivor-and-their-press-conference-at-capitol-hill-6-22-26--72619821</link><description><![CDATA[At the Capitol press conference, Epstein survivors delivered a blunt, unified message: the federal government has failed them repeatedly, and symbolic gestures are no longer acceptable. Standing alongside advocates and lawmakers, survivors described years of being ignored, sidelined, and excluded from decisions that directly affected their lives and their cases. They spoke about the non-prosecution agreement, the secrecy surrounding it, and the continued refusal by the DOJ to fully acknowledge or remedy the harm caused by its own misconduct. The press conference was not framed as a plea for sympathy, but as a demand for accountability. Survivors emphasized that transparency laws and victims’ rights mean nothing if the DOJ can violate them without consequence. They made clear that Epstein’s death did not end the crimes, did not erase co-conspirators, and did not absolve the government of its duty to pursue the truth. The setting of the Capitol was deliberate, underscoring that this was not just a legal failure, but a systemic one that required congressional oversight and intervention.<br /><br />Several survivors used the moment to call out what they described as performative concern from federal officials, contrasting public statements about victim advocacy with years of private indifference. They criticized the DOJ for slow-walking disclosures, over-redacting files, and framing Epstein as a lone offender despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Family members and advocates stressed that justice delayed has functioned as justice denied, allowing powerful figures to escape scrutiny while survivors were forced to relive their trauma in courtrooms and press cycles. The press conference ended with clear demands: full enforcement of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act, independent oversight of the DOJ’s handling of Epstein-related matters, and a real commitment to pursuing anyone who enabled or participated in the abuse. The tone was resolute and unsparing. Survivors made it clear they were no longer asking to be heard. They were insisting that the government finally be held to the same standards it claims to enforce.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72619821</guid><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 10:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72619821/megasurvivorpressconference.mp3" length="35869719" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6e9c52cd-7fca-44a0-9f20-b6583f8f3b97/6e9c52cd-7fca-44a0-9f20-b6583f8f3b97.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6e9c52cd-7fca-44a0-9f20-b6583f8f3b97/6e9c52cd-7fca-44a0-9f20-b6583f8f3b97.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6e9c52cd-7fca-44a0-9f20-b6583f8f3b97/6e9c52cd-7fca-44a0-9f20-b6583f8f3b97.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>At the Capitol press conference, Epstein survivors delivered a blunt, unified message: the federal government has failed them repeatedly, and symbolic gestures are no longer acceptable. Standing alongside advocates and lawmakers, survivors described...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[At the Capitol press conference, Epstein survivors delivered a blunt, unified message: the federal government has failed them repeatedly, and symbolic gestures are no longer acceptable. Standing alongside advocates and lawmakers, survivors described years of being ignored, sidelined, and excluded from decisions that directly affected their lives and their cases. They spoke about the non-prosecution agreement, the secrecy surrounding it, and the continued refusal by the DOJ to fully acknowledge or remedy the harm caused by its own misconduct. The press conference was not framed as a plea for sympathy, but as a demand for accountability. Survivors emphasized that transparency laws and victims’ rights mean nothing if the DOJ can violate them without consequence. They made clear that Epstein’s death did not end the crimes, did not erase co-conspirators, and did not absolve the government of its duty to pursue the truth. The setting of the Capitol was deliberate, underscoring that this was not just a legal failure, but a systemic one that required congressional oversight and intervention.<br /><br />Several survivors used the moment to call out what they described as performative concern from federal officials, contrasting public statements about victim advocacy with years of private indifference. They criticized the DOJ for slow-walking disclosures, over-redacting files, and framing Epstein as a lone offender despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Family members and advocates stressed that justice delayed has functioned as justice denied, allowing powerful figures to escape scrutiny while survivors were forced to relive their trauma in courtrooms and press cycles. The press conference ended with clear demands: full enforcement of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act, independent oversight of the DOJ’s handling of Epstein-related matters, and a real commitment to pursuing anyone who enabled or participated in the abuse. The tone was resolute and unsparing. Survivors made it clear they were no longer asking to be heard. They were insisting that the government finally be held to the same standards it claims to enforce.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2242</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Jeffrey Epstein And The Sudden Onset Of Amnesia For Those Who Were Closest To him (6/22/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-the-sudden-onset-of-amnesia-for-those-who-were-closest-to-him-6-22-26--72619820</link><description><![CDATA[The great lie of the Epstein scandal isn’t just what he did, but how the powerful around him suddenly claimed they couldn’t remember him at all. Presidents, princes, billionaires, academics, bankers, and celebrities who once courted his money and shared his jets all reached for the same script when the walls closed in: I barely knew him. It was a coordinated act of survival, not an accident. Institutions like Harvard, MIT, Deutsche Bank, and JP Morgan played the same game, pretending they never saw the red flags. Legacy media, instead of hammering the contradictions, often published these denials straight, allowing amnesia to masquerade as truth. Forgetting became strategy, and strategy became cover.<br /><br /><br />But memory leaves evidence. Flight logs, photographs, donations, and testimonies remain, and every denial only underscores the complicity of those who looked away. The survivors don’t get to forget; they live with scars while the powerful rewrite history. What the amnesia act reveals is cowardice: a willingness to erase reality to protect reputation. Epstein built his empire on memory, yet his circle tried to survive through erasure. In the end, their denials brand them more deeply than their associations ever could—because the attempt to forget is itself proof they remembered perfectly well.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72619820</guid><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 08:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72619820/megaepsteinamnesia.mp3" length="24906231" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/98864a36-0474-4a4c-a450-426008fdf4da/98864a36-0474-4a4c-a450-426008fdf4da.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/98864a36-0474-4a4c-a450-426008fdf4da/98864a36-0474-4a4c-a450-426008fdf4da.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/98864a36-0474-4a4c-a450-426008fdf4da/98864a36-0474-4a4c-a450-426008fdf4da.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The great lie of the Epstein scandal isn’t just what he did, but how the powerful around him suddenly claimed they couldn’t remember him at all. Presidents, princes, billionaires, academics, bankers, and celebrities who once courted his money and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The great lie of the Epstein scandal isn’t just what he did, but how the powerful around him suddenly claimed they couldn’t remember him at all. Presidents, princes, billionaires, academics, bankers, and celebrities who once courted his money and shared his jets all reached for the same script when the walls closed in: I barely knew him. It was a coordinated act of survival, not an accident. Institutions like Harvard, MIT, Deutsche Bank, and JP Morgan played the same game, pretending they never saw the red flags. Legacy media, instead of hammering the contradictions, often published these denials straight, allowing amnesia to masquerade as truth. Forgetting became strategy, and strategy became cover.<br /><br /><br />But memory leaves evidence. Flight logs, photographs, donations, and testimonies remain, and every denial only underscores the complicity of those who looked away. The survivors don’t get to forget; they live with scars while the powerful rewrite history. What the amnesia act reveals is cowardice: a willingness to erase reality to protect reputation. Epstein built his empire on memory, yet his circle tried to survive through erasure. In the end, their denials brand them more deeply than their associations ever could—because the attempt to forget is itself proof they remembered perfectly well.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1557</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Epstein Survivors And Their Families Call Out The DOJ (6/22/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-epstein-survivors-and-their-families-call-out-the-doj-6-22-26--72619819</link><description><![CDATA[Epstein survivors have been consistent and unambiguous in their message: the Department of Justice has ignored them at every critical juncture, treating their trauma as an inconvenience rather than a legal and moral obligation. From the original non-prosecution agreement to the latest file releases, survivors have said they were sidelined, excluded, and spoken about only after decisions were already made behind closed doors. They have repeatedly pointed out that the DOJ failed to meaningfully consult them, failed to inform them in real time, and failed to honor their rights under the Crime Victims’ Rights Act. Instead of transparency, they were met with silence. Instead of accountability, they were given procedural excuses. Survivors have said the DOJ’s posture has felt less like a pursuit of justice and more like damage control, where institutional reputation took priority over truth. Each time the government claimed the matter was resolved or closed, survivors were left watching from the outside, knowing that key questions remained unanswered and powerful people remained untouched. The message they say they received was simple and brutal: your pain is acknowledged rhetorically, but it will not shape outcomes.<br /><br /><br />Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s family has echoed those same criticisms, especially in the aftermath of Epstein’s death and the DOJ’s repeated declarations that the case was effectively over. They have said the government’s actions amounted to erasure, not resolution, and that closing the case without fully pursuing co-conspirators or exposing the full scope of Epstein’s network compounded the original injustice. The family has argued that the DOJ framed Epstein as a lone offender precisely to avoid reckoning with its own past failures and the complicity of others. In public statements, they have described feeling shut out of the process, ignored when raising concerns, and dismissed when demanding accountability beyond Epstein himself. For them, the DOJ’s conduct didn’t just fail to deliver justice, it actively reopened wounds by signaling that institutional convenience mattered more than survivor voices. Taken together, the survivors’ statements paint a picture of a justice system that listened just enough to say it cared, but not enough to change course, confront its own misconduct, or deliver the full truth they have been asking for all along.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72619819</guid><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 06:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72619819/megaepsteinsurvivorsignoredbydojvirgfamspeaksout.mp3" length="32309124" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/35561841-e23c-4f2f-91b2-e6cb4d3fb53a/35561841-e23c-4f2f-91b2-e6cb4d3fb53a.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/35561841-e23c-4f2f-91b2-e6cb4d3fb53a/35561841-e23c-4f2f-91b2-e6cb4d3fb53a.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/35561841-e23c-4f2f-91b2-e6cb4d3fb53a/35561841-e23c-4f2f-91b2-e6cb4d3fb53a.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Epstein survivors have been consistent and unambiguous in their message: the Department of Justice has ignored them at every critical juncture, treating their trauma as an inconvenience rather than a legal and moral obligation. From the original...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Epstein survivors have been consistent and unambiguous in their message: the Department of Justice has ignored them at every critical juncture, treating their trauma as an inconvenience rather than a legal and moral obligation. From the original non-prosecution agreement to the latest file releases, survivors have said they were sidelined, excluded, and spoken about only after decisions were already made behind closed doors. They have repeatedly pointed out that the DOJ failed to meaningfully consult them, failed to inform them in real time, and failed to honor their rights under the Crime Victims’ Rights Act. Instead of transparency, they were met with silence. Instead of accountability, they were given procedural excuses. Survivors have said the DOJ’s posture has felt less like a pursuit of justice and more like damage control, where institutional reputation took priority over truth. Each time the government claimed the matter was resolved or closed, survivors were left watching from the outside, knowing that key questions remained unanswered and powerful people remained untouched. The message they say they received was simple and brutal: your pain is acknowledged rhetorically, but it will not shape outcomes.<br /><br /><br />Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s family has echoed those same criticisms, especially in the aftermath of Epstein’s death and the DOJ’s repeated declarations that the case was effectively over. They have said the government’s actions amounted to erasure, not resolution, and that closing the case without fully pursuing co-conspirators or exposing the full scope of Epstein’s network compounded the original injustice. The family has argued that the DOJ framed Epstein as a lone offender precisely to avoid reckoning with its own past failures and the complicity of others. In public statements, they have described feeling shut out of the process, ignored when raising concerns, and dismissed when demanding accountability beyond Epstein himself. For them, the DOJ’s conduct didn’t just fail to deliver justice, it actively reopened wounds by signaling that institutional convenience mattered more than survivor voices. Taken together, the survivors’ statements paint a picture of a justice system that listened just enough to say it cared, but not enough to change course, confront its own misconduct, or deliver the full truth they have been asking for all along.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2020</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Death Of Jean Luc Brunel</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-death-of-jean-luc-brunel--72619790</link><description><![CDATA[Jean-Luc Brunel was found dead in his cell at La Santé prison in Paris during the early hours of February 19, 2022. French authorities said the 75-year-old modeling agent had been found hanged during an overnight inspection and treated his death as a suicide. Brunel had been held in custody since his arrest at Charles de Gaulle Airport in December 2020, when authorities detained him as he was preparing to fly to Senegal. He was under formal investigation over allegations involving the rape and sexual assault of minors and adults, as well as suspicions that he had helped arrange transportation and accommodations for young women connected to Jeffrey Epstein. Brunel denied the allegations against him and died before the case could proceed to trial.<br /><br />Brunel had been a prominent figure in the international modeling industry and founded MC2 Model Management with financial backing from Epstein. Multiple women had accused him of sexual misconduct over several decades, while Virginia Giuffre alleged in court filings that he supplied young women and girls to Epstein. His death ended the possibility that he would face a public trial, testify under oath or be questioned further about his relationship with Epstein and others in their social and business circles. French authorities opened an investigation into the circumstances of his death, but officials reported no immediate indication that another person had been involved.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72619790</guid><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 04:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72619790/deathjeanluc.mp3" length="20279423" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e6914fd9-a104-4697-81b4-be649f158195/e6914fd9-a104-4697-81b4-be649f158195.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e6914fd9-a104-4697-81b4-be649f158195/e6914fd9-a104-4697-81b4-be649f158195.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e6914fd9-a104-4697-81b4-be649f158195/e6914fd9-a104-4697-81b4-be649f158195.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jean-Luc Brunel was found dead in his cell at La Santé prison in Paris during the early hours of February 19, 2022. French authorities said the 75-year-old modeling agent had been found hanged during an overnight inspection and treated his death as a...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jean-Luc Brunel was found dead in his cell at La Santé prison in Paris during the early hours of February 19, 2022. French authorities said the 75-year-old modeling agent had been found hanged during an overnight inspection and treated his death as a suicide. Brunel had been held in custody since his arrest at Charles de Gaulle Airport in December 2020, when authorities detained him as he was preparing to fly to Senegal. He was under formal investigation over allegations involving the rape and sexual assault of minors and adults, as well as suspicions that he had helped arrange transportation and accommodations for young women connected to Jeffrey Epstein. Brunel denied the allegations against him and died before the case could proceed to trial.<br /><br />Brunel had been a prominent figure in the international modeling industry and founded MC2 Model Management with financial backing from Epstein. Multiple women had accused him of sexual misconduct over several decades, while Virginia Giuffre alleged in court filings that he supplied young women and girls to Epstein. His death ended the possibility that he would face a public trial, testify under oath or be questioned further about his relationship with Epstein and others in their social and business circles. French authorities opened an investigation into the circumstances of his death, but officials reported no immediate indication that another person had been involved.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1268</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Courtney Wild And Her Jeffrey  Epstein Related Deposition From 2017 (Part 11)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/courtney-wild-and-her-jeffrey-epstein-related-deposition-from-2017-part-11--72604340</link><description><![CDATA[In the 2017 video deposition of Courtney E. Wild, taken as part of the civil case Epstein v. Rothstein in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Wild testified under oath about her personal background, criminal history, and relevant circumstances before the court began substantive questions. The early portion of the deposition focuses on Wild’s identity and personal history, including her marriage, family situation, and her own past convictions, including a drug trafficking conviction for which she was serving a sentence at the Gadsden Correctional Facility in Florida at the time of the deposition. Wild was sworn in and answered basic biographical questions about her life prior to moving into the heart of the civil litigation against Epstein’s representatives and others, establishing her presence and credibility as a witness in the case’s factual record<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Epstein%20v.%20Rothstein,%20No.%2050-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB%20(Fla.%2015th%20Cir.%20Ct.%202009)/1027.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1027.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72604340</guid><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 02:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72604340/courtneywilddeposition10.mp3" length="10501686" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1a8750b7-daa9-443c-a46a-4bd16d441387/1a8750b7-daa9-443c-a46a-4bd16d441387.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1a8750b7-daa9-443c-a46a-4bd16d441387/1a8750b7-daa9-443c-a46a-4bd16d441387.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1a8750b7-daa9-443c-a46a-4bd16d441387/1a8750b7-daa9-443c-a46a-4bd16d441387.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In the 2017 video deposition of Courtney E. Wild, taken as part of the civil case Epstein v. Rothstein in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Wild testified under oath about her personal background, criminal history, and relevant...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In the 2017 video deposition of Courtney E. Wild, taken as part of the civil case Epstein v. Rothstein in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Wild testified under oath about her personal background, criminal history, and relevant circumstances before the court began substantive questions. The early portion of the deposition focuses on Wild’s identity and personal history, including her marriage, family situation, and her own past convictions, including a drug trafficking conviction for which she was serving a sentence at the Gadsden Correctional Facility in Florida at the time of the deposition. Wild was sworn in and answered basic biographical questions about her life prior to moving into the heart of the civil litigation against Epstein’s representatives and others, establishing her presence and credibility as a witness in the case’s factual record<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Epstein%20v.%20Rothstein,%20No.%2050-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB%20(Fla.%2015th%20Cir.%20Ct.%202009)/1027.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1027.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>657</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Courtney Wild And Her Jeffrey  Epstein Related Deposition From 2017 (Part 10)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/courtney-wild-and-her-jeffrey-epstein-related-deposition-from-2017-part-10--72604341</link><description><![CDATA[In the 2017 video deposition of Courtney E. Wild, taken as part of the civil case Epstein v. Rothstein in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Wild testified under oath about her personal background, criminal history, and relevant circumstances before the court began substantive questions. The early portion of the deposition focuses on Wild’s identity and personal history, including her marriage, family situation, and her own past convictions, including a drug trafficking conviction for which she was serving a sentence at the Gadsden Correctional Facility in Florida at the time of the deposition. Wild was sworn in and answered basic biographical questions about her life prior to moving into the heart of the civil litigation against Epstein’s representatives and others, establishing her presence and credibility as a witness in the case’s factual record<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Epstein%20v.%20Rothstein,%20No.%2050-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB%20(Fla.%2015th%20Cir.%20Ct.%202009)/1027.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1027.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72604341</guid><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 00:15:01 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72604341/courtneywilddepositon8.mp3" length="12591482" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0066d0b7-8d28-4a7b-9c96-0c0d511fc551/0066d0b7-8d28-4a7b-9c96-0c0d511fc551.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0066d0b7-8d28-4a7b-9c96-0c0d511fc551/0066d0b7-8d28-4a7b-9c96-0c0d511fc551.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0066d0b7-8d28-4a7b-9c96-0c0d511fc551/0066d0b7-8d28-4a7b-9c96-0c0d511fc551.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In the 2017 video deposition of Courtney E. Wild, taken as part of the civil case Epstein v. Rothstein in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Wild testified under oath about her personal background, criminal history, and relevant...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In the 2017 video deposition of Courtney E. Wild, taken as part of the civil case Epstein v. Rothstein in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Wild testified under oath about her personal background, criminal history, and relevant circumstances before the court began substantive questions. The early portion of the deposition focuses on Wild’s identity and personal history, including her marriage, family situation, and her own past convictions, including a drug trafficking conviction for which she was serving a sentence at the Gadsden Correctional Facility in Florida at the time of the deposition. Wild was sworn in and answered basic biographical questions about her life prior to moving into the heart of the civil litigation against Epstein’s representatives and others, establishing her presence and credibility as a witness in the case’s factual record<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Epstein%20v.%20Rothstein,%20No.%2050-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB%20(Fla.%2015th%20Cir.%20Ct.%202009)/1027.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1027.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>787</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Courtney Wild And Her Jeffrey  Epstein Related Deposition From 2017 (Part 9)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/courtney-wild-and-her-jeffrey-epstein-related-deposition-from-2017-part-9--72604346</link><description><![CDATA[In the 2017 video deposition of Courtney E. Wild, taken as part of the civil case Epstein v. Rothstein in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Wild testified under oath about her personal background, criminal history, and relevant circumstances before the court began substantive questions. The early portion of the deposition focuses on Wild’s identity and personal history, including her marriage, family situation, and her own past convictions, including a drug trafficking conviction for which she was serving a sentence at the Gadsden Correctional Facility in Florida at the time of the deposition. Wild was sworn in and answered basic biographical questions about her life prior to moving into the heart of the civil litigation against Epstein’s representatives and others, establishing her presence and credibility as a witness in the case’s factual record<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Epstein%20v.%20Rothstein,%20No.%2050-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB%20(Fla.%2015th%20Cir.%20Ct.%202009)/1027.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1027.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72604346</guid><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 22:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72604346/courtneywilddeposition9.mp3" length="14685039" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9b3ad287-5d7d-490c-a16f-bbf8a5ff136d/9b3ad287-5d7d-490c-a16f-bbf8a5ff136d.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9b3ad287-5d7d-490c-a16f-bbf8a5ff136d/9b3ad287-5d7d-490c-a16f-bbf8a5ff136d.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9b3ad287-5d7d-490c-a16f-bbf8a5ff136d/9b3ad287-5d7d-490c-a16f-bbf8a5ff136d.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In the 2017 video deposition of Courtney E. Wild, taken as part of the civil case Epstein v. Rothstein in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Wild testified under oath about her personal background, criminal history, and relevant...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In the 2017 video deposition of Courtney E. Wild, taken as part of the civil case Epstein v. Rothstein in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Wild testified under oath about her personal background, criminal history, and relevant circumstances before the court began substantive questions. The early portion of the deposition focuses on Wild’s identity and personal history, including her marriage, family situation, and her own past convictions, including a drug trafficking conviction for which she was serving a sentence at the Gadsden Correctional Facility in Florida at the time of the deposition. Wild was sworn in and answered basic biographical questions about her life prior to moving into the heart of the civil litigation against Epstein’s representatives and others, establishing her presence and credibility as a witness in the case’s factual record<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Epstein%20v.%20Rothstein,%20No.%2050-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB%20(Fla.%2015th%20Cir.%20Ct.%202009)/1027.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1027.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>918</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The UK Inquiry Into Grooming Gangs:   Chloe Tells Her Story (6/21/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-uk-inquiry-into-grooming-gangs-chloe-tells-her-story-6-21-26--72619810</link><description><![CDATA[Rupert Lowe’s inquiry says it received evidence from survivors, relatives, whistleblowers, professionals and political figures about organised child sexual exploitation in communities across the United Kingdom. The report describes a recurring pattern in which vulnerable girls were targeted with attention, gifts, alcohol and drugs before being subjected to sexual violence, intimidation and trafficking between offenders and locations. It states that the victims discussed in the evidence were predominantly white British girls and that many of the alleged perpetrators were men of Pakistani Muslim heritage. The inquiry says the abuse was allowed to continue because police forces, social services, schools, healthcare providers, licensing authorities and government bodies repeatedly failed to identify victims, share information, investigate allegations properly or intervene when clear warning signs appeared.<br /><br />The report calls for mandatory reporting of suspected child sexual exploitation, improved collection of demographic information about victims and offenders, specialist police units and a consistent national system for sharing safeguarding intelligence. It also recommends regular training for police officers, teachers, medical staff and social workers; automatic referrals when children present with injuries, pregnancies, sexually transmitted infections, self-harm or other indicators of exploitation; and long-term medical, psychological, housing and legal support for survivors. Additional recommendations include reviewing convictions imposed on children who committed offences while being exploited, stronger sentencing, deportation proceedings against convicted foreign nationals where legally applicable, and legal action against perpetrators or officials believed to have escaped accountability.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://static1.squarespace.com/static/6810978a41bbc42489eafa81/t/6a314bb1151e511944bd4421/1781615537601/The+Rape+Gang+Inquiry+Report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Rape Gang Inquiry Report.docx</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72619810</guid><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 20:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72619810/ukgrooming3_chloe.mp3" length="22699825" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1092948a-65cf-4e26-9c35-0225cccfc3fa/1092948a-65cf-4e26-9c35-0225cccfc3fa.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1092948a-65cf-4e26-9c35-0225cccfc3fa/1092948a-65cf-4e26-9c35-0225cccfc3fa.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1092948a-65cf-4e26-9c35-0225cccfc3fa/1092948a-65cf-4e26-9c35-0225cccfc3fa.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Rupert Lowe’s inquiry says it received evidence from survivors, relatives, whistleblowers, professionals and political figures about organised child sexual exploitation in communities across the United Kingdom. The report describes a recurring pattern...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Rupert Lowe’s inquiry says it received evidence from survivors, relatives, whistleblowers, professionals and political figures about organised child sexual exploitation in communities across the United Kingdom. The report describes a recurring pattern in which vulnerable girls were targeted with attention, gifts, alcohol and drugs before being subjected to sexual violence, intimidation and trafficking between offenders and locations. It states that the victims discussed in the evidence were predominantly white British girls and that many of the alleged perpetrators were men of Pakistani Muslim heritage. The inquiry says the abuse was allowed to continue because police forces, social services, schools, healthcare providers, licensing authorities and government bodies repeatedly failed to identify victims, share information, investigate allegations properly or intervene when clear warning signs appeared.<br /><br />The report calls for mandatory reporting of suspected child sexual exploitation, improved collection of demographic information about victims and offenders, specialist police units and a consistent national system for sharing safeguarding intelligence. It also recommends regular training for police officers, teachers, medical staff and social workers; automatic referrals when children present with injuries, pregnancies, sexually transmitted infections, self-harm or other indicators of exploitation; and long-term medical, psychological, housing and legal support for survivors. Additional recommendations include reviewing convictions imposed on children who committed offences while being exploited, stronger sentencing, deportation proceedings against convicted foreign nationals where legally applicable, and legal action against perpetrators or officials believed to have escaped accountability.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://static1.squarespace.com/static/6810978a41bbc42489eafa81/t/6a314bb1151e511944bd4421/1781615537601/The+Rape+Gang+Inquiry+Report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Rape Gang Inquiry Report.docx</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1419</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>britishnews,britishpolitics,coverup,england,groomingganginquiry,groominggangs,groominggangscandal,labour,labourparty,london,mandatoryreporting,news,rochdalegroomingscandal,rupertlowe,scotlandyard,starmer,survivortestimony,torry,uk,unitedkingdom</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The UK Inquiry Into Grooming Gangs:   London (6/21/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-uk-inquiry-into-grooming-gangs-london-6-21-26--72619808</link><description><![CDATA[Rupert Lowe’s inquiry says it received evidence from survivors, relatives, whistleblowers, professionals and political figures about organised child sexual exploitation in communities across the United Kingdom. The report describes a recurring pattern in which vulnerable girls were targeted with attention, gifts, alcohol and drugs before being subjected to sexual violence, intimidation and trafficking between offenders and locations. It states that the victims discussed in the evidence were predominantly white British girls and that many of the alleged perpetrators were men of Pakistani Muslim heritage. The inquiry says the abuse was allowed to continue because police forces, social services, schools, healthcare providers, licensing authorities and government bodies repeatedly failed to identify victims, share information, investigate allegations properly or intervene when clear warning signs appeared.<br /><br />The report calls for mandatory reporting of suspected child sexual exploitation, improved collection of demographic information about victims and offenders, specialist police units and a consistent national system for sharing safeguarding intelligence. It also recommends regular training for police officers, teachers, medical staff and social workers; automatic referrals when children present with injuries, pregnancies, sexually transmitted infections, self-harm or other indicators of exploitation; and long-term medical, psychological, housing and legal support for survivors. Additional recommendations include reviewing convictions imposed on children who committed offences while being exploited, stronger sentencing, deportation proceedings against convicted foreign nationals where legally applicable, and legal action against perpetrators or officials believed to have escaped accountability.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://static1.squarespace.com/static/6810978a41bbc42489eafa81/t/6a314bb1151e511944bd4421/1781615537601/The+Rape+Gang+Inquiry+Report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Rape Gang Inquiry Report.docx</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72619808</guid><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 18:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72619808/ukgrooming2_london.mp3" length="11197588" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/161bba81-49b2-45d9-b567-09df79c7e186/161bba81-49b2-45d9-b567-09df79c7e186.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/161bba81-49b2-45d9-b567-09df79c7e186/161bba81-49b2-45d9-b567-09df79c7e186.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/161bba81-49b2-45d9-b567-09df79c7e186/161bba81-49b2-45d9-b567-09df79c7e186.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Rupert Lowe’s inquiry says it received evidence from survivors, relatives, whistleblowers, professionals and political figures about organised child sexual exploitation in communities across the United Kingdom. The report describes a recurring pattern...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Rupert Lowe’s inquiry says it received evidence from survivors, relatives, whistleblowers, professionals and political figures about organised child sexual exploitation in communities across the United Kingdom. The report describes a recurring pattern in which vulnerable girls were targeted with attention, gifts, alcohol and drugs before being subjected to sexual violence, intimidation and trafficking between offenders and locations. It states that the victims discussed in the evidence were predominantly white British girls and that many of the alleged perpetrators were men of Pakistani Muslim heritage. The inquiry says the abuse was allowed to continue because police forces, social services, schools, healthcare providers, licensing authorities and government bodies repeatedly failed to identify victims, share information, investigate allegations properly or intervene when clear warning signs appeared.<br /><br />The report calls for mandatory reporting of suspected child sexual exploitation, improved collection of demographic information about victims and offenders, specialist police units and a consistent national system for sharing safeguarding intelligence. It also recommends regular training for police officers, teachers, medical staff and social workers; automatic referrals when children present with injuries, pregnancies, sexually transmitted infections, self-harm or other indicators of exploitation; and long-term medical, psychological, housing and legal support for survivors. Additional recommendations include reviewing convictions imposed on children who committed offences while being exploited, stronger sentencing, deportation proceedings against convicted foreign nationals where legally applicable, and legal action against perpetrators or officials believed to have escaped accountability.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://static1.squarespace.com/static/6810978a41bbc42489eafa81/t/6a314bb1151e511944bd4421/1781615537601/The+Rape+Gang+Inquiry+Report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Rape Gang Inquiry Report.docx</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>700</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>britishnews,britishpolitics,coverup,england,groomingganginquiry,groominggangs,groominggangscandal,labour,labourparty,london,mandatoryreporting,news,rochdalegroomingscandal,rupertlowe,scotlandyard,starmer,survivortestimony,torry,uk,unitedkingdom</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Tova Noel And The Transcript From Her Congressional Testimony (Part 3) (6/21/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/tova-noel-and-the-transcript-from-her-congressional-testimony-part-3-6-21-26--72619809</link><description><![CDATA[Tova Noel, one of the two correctional officers assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center’s Special Housing Unit on the night Jeffrey Epstein died, told the House Oversight Committee that she failed to conduct the required inmate checks and later signed records falsely indicating that the rounds had been completed. Noel described an understaffed, poorly managed facility in which she was exhausted, inadequately trained and assigned duties beyond her normal responsibilities. She maintained that she last saw Epstein alive during the evening medication round and observed nothing that made her believe he was preparing to harm himself. Noel also testified that Epstein received unusual accommodations, including extra bed linens, a CPAP machine and access to medication that appeared different from the treatment ordinarily given to other prisoners.<br /><br />Noel denied having any role in Epstein’s death, receiving money in connection with him or knowing anything about an alleged payment to facilitate access to his cell. She also rejected claims that she was the unidentified orange-colored figure seen moving toward Epstein’s tier at approximately 10:39 p.m., insisting that she never returned to the area and could not explain what—or who—the surveillance image showed. Although Noel said she believed Epstein died by suicide because he was supposedly alone inside the cell, her testimony did little to resolve the most important unanswered questions: why required checks were abandoned, why Epstein remained without a cellmate, who or what appeared near the tier, and how so many security procedures failed simultaneously. Instead, her account reinforced the picture of extraordinary negligence, special treatment and institutional dysfunction surrounding the death of the most consequential prisoner in federal custody.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72619809</guid><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 16:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72619809/tovanoelcongresstestimony3.mp3" length="14163008" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2cd5e656-abf9-470a-977c-71e3b9d4dd33/2cd5e656-abf9-470a-977c-71e3b9d4dd33.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2cd5e656-abf9-470a-977c-71e3b9d4dd33/2cd5e656-abf9-470a-977c-71e3b9d4dd33.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2cd5e656-abf9-470a-977c-71e3b9d4dd33/2cd5e656-abf9-470a-977c-71e3b9d4dd33.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Tova Noel, one of the two correctional officers assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center’s Special Housing Unit on the night Jeffrey Epstein died, told the House Oversight Committee that she failed to conduct the required inmate checks and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Tova Noel, one of the two correctional officers assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center’s Special Housing Unit on the night Jeffrey Epstein died, told the House Oversight Committee that she failed to conduct the required inmate checks and later signed records falsely indicating that the rounds had been completed. Noel described an understaffed, poorly managed facility in which she was exhausted, inadequately trained and assigned duties beyond her normal responsibilities. She maintained that she last saw Epstein alive during the evening medication round and observed nothing that made her believe he was preparing to harm himself. Noel also testified that Epstein received unusual accommodations, including extra bed linens, a CPAP machine and access to medication that appeared different from the treatment ordinarily given to other prisoners.<br /><br />Noel denied having any role in Epstein’s death, receiving money in connection with him or knowing anything about an alleged payment to facilitate access to his cell. She also rejected claims that she was the unidentified orange-colored figure seen moving toward Epstein’s tier at approximately 10:39 p.m., insisting that she never returned to the area and could not explain what—or who—the surveillance image showed. Although Noel said she believed Epstein died by suicide because he was supposedly alone inside the cell, her testimony did little to resolve the most important unanswered questions: why required checks were abandoned, why Epstein remained without a cellmate, who or what appeared near the tier, and how so many security procedures failed simultaneously. Instead, her account reinforced the picture of extraordinary negligence, special treatment and institutional dysfunction surrounding the death of the most consequential prisoner in federal custody.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>886</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega  Edition:  The Ghislaine Maxwell 2019 SDNY Grand Jury Transcript Unsealed (Part 4-6) (6/21/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-ghislaine-maxwell-2019-sdny-grand-jury-transcript-unsealed-part-4-6-6-21-26--72612223</link><description><![CDATA[The newly unsealed New York grand jury materials related to Ghislaine Maxwell provide a clearer window into how federal prosecutors built the case that ultimately led to her conviction. The documents outline the scope of witness testimony, evidentiary focus, and investigative priorities considered by the grand jury, reinforcing that Maxwell was not viewed as a peripheral figure but as a central facilitator within Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking operation. While much of the material aligns with facts already established at trial—including patterns of recruitment, grooming, and abuse—the unsealing confirms that prosecutors presented a structured, victim-centered narrative to the grand jury well before Maxwell’s arrest, countering claims that the case was rushed or politically motivated.<br /><br />At the same time, the documents have drawn attention for what they do not contain. The grand jury materials remain narrowly focused on Maxwell’s conduct and charges, offering little insight into why broader conspiracy cases against other Epstein associates were never pursued in New York. This has fueled renewed scrutiny of prosecutorial discretion and investigative limits, as the records show a deliberate effort to secure Maxwell’s indictment while leaving larger questions about Epstein’s network unresolved. For critics and survivors alike, the unsealing represents both a measure of long-delayed transparency and a reminder of how much of the Epstein story remains outside the bounds of criminal accountability.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72612223</guid><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 14:11:45 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72612223/megamaxwellgrandjuryny4n5n6.mp3" length="38165568" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7bbbe094-c2c4-4eaf-a235-e7319bcdab53/7bbbe094-c2c4-4eaf-a235-e7319bcdab53.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7bbbe094-c2c4-4eaf-a235-e7319bcdab53/7bbbe094-c2c4-4eaf-a235-e7319bcdab53.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7bbbe094-c2c4-4eaf-a235-e7319bcdab53/7bbbe094-c2c4-4eaf-a235-e7319bcdab53.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The newly unsealed New York grand jury materials related to Ghislaine Maxwell provide a clearer window into how federal prosecutors built the case that ultimately led to her conviction. The documents outline the scope of witness testimony, evidentiary...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The newly unsealed New York grand jury materials related to Ghislaine Maxwell provide a clearer window into how federal prosecutors built the case that ultimately led to her conviction. The documents outline the scope of witness testimony, evidentiary focus, and investigative priorities considered by the grand jury, reinforcing that Maxwell was not viewed as a peripheral figure but as a central facilitator within Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking operation. While much of the material aligns with facts already established at trial—including patterns of recruitment, grooming, and abuse—the unsealing confirms that prosecutors presented a structured, victim-centered narrative to the grand jury well before Maxwell’s arrest, countering claims that the case was rushed or politically motivated.<br /><br />At the same time, the documents have drawn attention for what they do not contain. The grand jury materials remain narrowly focused on Maxwell’s conduct and charges, offering little insight into why broader conspiracy cases against other Epstein associates were never pursued in New York. This has fueled renewed scrutiny of prosecutorial discretion and investigative limits, as the records show a deliberate effort to secure Maxwell’s indictment while leaving larger questions about Epstein’s network unresolved. For critics and survivors alike, the unsealing represents both a measure of long-delayed transparency and a reminder of how much of the Epstein story remains outside the bounds of criminal accountability.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2386</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega  Edition:  The Ghislaine Maxwell 2019 SDNY Grand Jury Transcript Unsealed (Part 1-3) (6/20/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-ghislaine-maxwell-2019-sdny-grand-jury-transcript-unsealed-part-1-3-6-20-26--72612222</link><description><![CDATA[The newly unsealed New York grand jury materials related to Ghislaine Maxwell provide a clearer window into how federal prosecutors built the case that ultimately led to her conviction. The documents outline the scope of witness testimony, evidentiary focus, and investigative priorities considered by the grand jury, reinforcing that Maxwell was not viewed as a peripheral figure but as a central facilitator within Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking operation. While much of the material aligns with facts already established at trial—including patterns of recruitment, grooming, and abuse—the unsealing confirms that prosecutors presented a structured, victim-centered narrative to the grand jury well before Maxwell’s arrest, countering claims that the case was rushed or politically motivated.<br /><br />At the same time, the documents have drawn attention for what they do not contain. The grand jury materials remain narrowly focused on Maxwell’s conduct and charges, offering little insight into why broader conspiracy cases against other Epstein associates were never pursued in New York. This has fueled renewed scrutiny of prosecutorial discretion and investigative limits, as the records show a deliberate effort to secure Maxwell’s indictment while leaving larger questions about Epstein’s network unresolved. For critics and survivors alike, the unsealing represents both a measure of long-delayed transparency and a reminder of how much of the Epstein story remains outside the bounds of criminal accountability.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72612222</guid><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72612222/megamaxwellgrandjuryny1n2n3.mp3" length="36930081" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9264a0e5-7f43-4dc6-9de3-54ff6ca280a8/9264a0e5-7f43-4dc6-9de3-54ff6ca280a8.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9264a0e5-7f43-4dc6-9de3-54ff6ca280a8/9264a0e5-7f43-4dc6-9de3-54ff6ca280a8.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9264a0e5-7f43-4dc6-9de3-54ff6ca280a8/9264a0e5-7f43-4dc6-9de3-54ff6ca280a8.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The newly unsealed New York grand jury materials related to Ghislaine Maxwell provide a clearer window into how federal prosecutors built the case that ultimately led to her conviction. The documents outline the scope of witness testimony, evidentiary...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The newly unsealed New York grand jury materials related to Ghislaine Maxwell provide a clearer window into how federal prosecutors built the case that ultimately led to her conviction. The documents outline the scope of witness testimony, evidentiary focus, and investigative priorities considered by the grand jury, reinforcing that Maxwell was not viewed as a peripheral figure but as a central facilitator within Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking operation. While much of the material aligns with facts already established at trial—including patterns of recruitment, grooming, and abuse—the unsealing confirms that prosecutors presented a structured, victim-centered narrative to the grand jury well before Maxwell’s arrest, countering claims that the case was rushed or politically motivated.<br /><br />At the same time, the documents have drawn attention for what they do not contain. The grand jury materials remain narrowly focused on Maxwell’s conduct and charges, offering little insight into why broader conspiracy cases against other Epstein associates were never pursued in New York. This has fueled renewed scrutiny of prosecutorial discretion and investigative limits, as the records show a deliberate effort to secure Maxwell’s indictment while leaving larger questions about Epstein’s network unresolved. For critics and survivors alike, the unsealing represents both a measure of long-delayed transparency and a reminder of how much of the Epstein story remains outside the bounds of criminal accountability.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2309</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Jeffrey Epstein And Jes Staley Relationship As Told By The Emails (6/21/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-jes-staley-relationship-as-told-by-the-emails-6-21-26--72612219</link><description><![CDATA[Leaked correspondence between Jes Staley—former CEO of Barclays and long-time JPMorgan executive—and Jeffrey Epstein laid bare more than just casual business exchanges; they revealed a troubling bond rooted in intimacy, trust, and privilege. In one exchange, Staley mused, “That was fun. Say hi to Snow White,” to which Epstein replied, “What character would you like next?” Staley coyly responded, “Beauty and the Beast,” turning their relationship into a grotesque pantomime. More damningly, Staley described Epstein as “family” and spoke of a “profound” connection, while photos of young women were also swapped—all under the guise of everyday correspondence. Far from distancing himself, Staley sustained contact well past Epstein’s 2008 conviction, even joining him on his private island in 2009—behavior that defied any claim of a “purely professional” relationship.<br /><br /><br />The fallout was swift—and deserved. The UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) concluded that Staley “recklessly misled” both Barclays and regulators by downplaying the closeness of his ties with Epstein. A £1.8 million fine (later reduced to £1.1 million) and a lifetime ban from senior financial roles followed. The Upper Tribunal upheld the sanctions, emphasizing that Staley knowingly took a calculated risk, hoping the truth would stay buried. But the emails, held up like digital incriminators, ensured his downfall. His denials, evasive demeanor in court, and attempt to frame the relationship as innocuous only magnified the breach of trust. In financial leadership, reputation is everything—and Staley burned his.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://finance.yahoo.com/news/epstein-staley-emails-reveal-friendship-230005126.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein-Staley Emails Reveal Friendship Forged at JPMorgan (yahoo.com)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72612219</guid><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72612219/megaepsteinstaleyemails.mp3" length="42515688" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2b496267-8d01-4c75-b89a-2108c70e8f62/2b496267-8d01-4c75-b89a-2108c70e8f62.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2b496267-8d01-4c75-b89a-2108c70e8f62/2b496267-8d01-4c75-b89a-2108c70e8f62.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2b496267-8d01-4c75-b89a-2108c70e8f62/2b496267-8d01-4c75-b89a-2108c70e8f62.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Leaked correspondence between Jes Staley—former CEO of Barclays and long-time JPMorgan executive—and Jeffrey Epstein laid bare more than just casual business exchanges; they revealed a troubling bond rooted in intimacy, trust, and privilege. In one...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Leaked correspondence between Jes Staley—former CEO of Barclays and long-time JPMorgan executive—and Jeffrey Epstein laid bare more than just casual business exchanges; they revealed a troubling bond rooted in intimacy, trust, and privilege. In one exchange, Staley mused, “That was fun. Say hi to Snow White,” to which Epstein replied, “What character would you like next?” Staley coyly responded, “Beauty and the Beast,” turning their relationship into a grotesque pantomime. More damningly, Staley described Epstein as “family” and spoke of a “profound” connection, while photos of young women were also swapped—all under the guise of everyday correspondence. Far from distancing himself, Staley sustained contact well past Epstein’s 2008 conviction, even joining him on his private island in 2009—behavior that defied any claim of a “purely professional” relationship.<br /><br /><br />The fallout was swift—and deserved. The UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) concluded that Staley “recklessly misled” both Barclays and regulators by downplaying the closeness of his ties with Epstein. A £1.8 million fine (later reduced to £1.1 million) and a lifetime ban from senior financial roles followed. The Upper Tribunal upheld the sanctions, emphasizing that Staley knowingly took a calculated risk, hoping the truth would stay buried. But the emails, held up like digital incriminators, ensured his downfall. His denials, evasive demeanor in court, and attempt to frame the relationship as innocuous only magnified the breach of trust. In financial leadership, reputation is everything—and Staley burned his.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://finance.yahoo.com/news/epstein-staley-emails-reveal-friendship-230005126.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein-Staley Emails Reveal Friendship Forged at JPMorgan (yahoo.com)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2658</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Maria Farmer And Her Allegations Against Jeffrey Epstein And His Estate (6/20/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-maria-farmer-and-her-allegations-against-jeffrey-epstein-and-his-estate-6-20-26--72612218</link><description><![CDATA[Maria Farmer, one of the earliest known accusers of Jeffrey Epstein, has alleged that Epstein and his associate Ghislaine Maxwell sexually abused her when she was in her late teens in the mid-1990s. Farmer has stated that Epstein and Maxwell recruited her under the pretense of helping her artistic career, then coerced her into sexual encounters at Epstein’s New York townhouse and Palm Beach mansion. She has also described being trafficked to other locations where Epstein’s powerful friends were present and claims that attempts to report the abuse to authorities were ignored or dismissed, allowing the exploitation to continue. Farmer’s testimony has been part of civil claims against Epstein’s estate and documents made public through litigation have detailed her accounts of manipulation, isolation, and sexual assault.<br /><br />In addition to her personal abuse claims, Farmer has accused Epstein and Maxwell of operating a larger trafficking network in which vulnerable young women were groomed and exploited. She has provided sworn statements and affidavits asserting that Epstein maintained detailed records and materials related to the abuse, and that individuals in his circle were aware of, or complicit in, the exploitation. Farmer’s allegations have contributed to a broader legal and public examination of Epstein’s conduct, including claims against his estate by survivors seeking compensation and accountability for decades of alleged trafficking and sexual abuse.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72612218</guid><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72612218/megamariafarmerallegationsestate.mp3" length="26214862" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6f479687-2a4c-43fe-913d-9ec67fb3b7c9/6f479687-2a4c-43fe-913d-9ec67fb3b7c9.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6f479687-2a4c-43fe-913d-9ec67fb3b7c9/6f479687-2a4c-43fe-913d-9ec67fb3b7c9.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6f479687-2a4c-43fe-913d-9ec67fb3b7c9/6f479687-2a4c-43fe-913d-9ec67fb3b7c9.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Maria Farmer, one of the earliest known accusers of Jeffrey Epstein, has alleged that Epstein and his associate Ghislaine Maxwell sexually abused her when she was in her late teens in the mid-1990s. Farmer has stated that Epstein and Maxwell recruited...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Maria Farmer, one of the earliest known accusers of Jeffrey Epstein, has alleged that Epstein and his associate Ghislaine Maxwell sexually abused her when she was in her late teens in the mid-1990s. Farmer has stated that Epstein and Maxwell recruited her under the pretense of helping her artistic career, then coerced her into sexual encounters at Epstein’s New York townhouse and Palm Beach mansion. She has also described being trafficked to other locations where Epstein’s powerful friends were present and claims that attempts to report the abuse to authorities were ignored or dismissed, allowing the exploitation to continue. Farmer’s testimony has been part of civil claims against Epstein’s estate and documents made public through litigation have detailed her accounts of manipulation, isolation, and sexual assault.<br /><br />In addition to her personal abuse claims, Farmer has accused Epstein and Maxwell of operating a larger trafficking network in which vulnerable young women were groomed and exploited. She has provided sworn statements and affidavits asserting that Epstein maintained detailed records and materials related to the abuse, and that individuals in his circle were aware of, or complicit in, the exploitation. Farmer’s allegations have contributed to a broader legal and public examination of Epstein’s conduct, including claims against his estate by survivors seeking compensation and accountability for decades of alleged trafficking and sexual abuse.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1639</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Les Wexner's Best Friend Was Jeffrey Epstein...Until He Forgot Who He Was (6/20/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-les-wexner-s-best-friend-was-jeffrey-epstein-until-he-forgot-who-he-was-6-20-26--72604564</link><description><![CDATA[Les Wexner’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein was not casual, fleeting, or peripheral. It was foundational. Wexner, the billionaire founder of L Brands and longtime head of Victoria’s Secret, handed Epstein extraordinary financial authority in the late 1980s, granting him sweeping power of attorney over his fortune—an almost unheard-of concession for a man with no formal wealth management credentials and a murky background. Epstein was not just an adviser; he was embedded. He controlled Wexner’s money, managed properties, and reportedly inserted himself into the culture of Wexner’s corporate empire, particularly as it related to the Victoria’s Secret modeling world that conveniently overlapped with Epstein’s trafficking pipeline. The transfer of a Manhattan townhouse—one of the largest private residences in the city—to Epstein for a nominal sum remains one of the most glaring symbols of that patronage. For years, Wexner allowed Epstein to operate under his name and prestige, giving Epstein the legitimacy that opened doors in finance, academia, politics, and philanthropy. Epstein’s entire aura of elite credibility can be traced in large part to the halo effect of Wexner’s wealth and status.<br /><br /><br />After Epstein’s 2006 arrest and especially following the 2019 federal charges, Wexner abruptly attempted to recast himself as a victim—claiming Epstein had betrayed him, stolen from him, and misled him. He publicly severed ties, issued statements of regret, and emphasized that Epstein had been removed from his financial role years earlier. But that narrative strains credibility. Wexner was not an unsophisticated investor duped by a charming con man; he was one of the most powerful retail magnates in America with access to the best legal and financial minds in the world. The idea that Epstein could operate for years under his authority without scrutiny reflects either willful blindness or a level of negligence that borders on complicity. Wexner’s late-stage distancing felt less like moral clarity and more like reputational triage once the full scope of Epstein’s crimes became undeniable. His patronage built Epstein’s empire. His disavowal came only after the empire collapsed in public view.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72604564</guid><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 06:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72604564/megawexnerpatronageofepsteinandhisamnesia.mp3" length="41133497" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6c61aae2-26bb-4b93-a6e9-ce61ed046e3c/6c61aae2-26bb-4b93-a6e9-ce61ed046e3c.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6c61aae2-26bb-4b93-a6e9-ce61ed046e3c/6c61aae2-26bb-4b93-a6e9-ce61ed046e3c.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6c61aae2-26bb-4b93-a6e9-ce61ed046e3c/6c61aae2-26bb-4b93-a6e9-ce61ed046e3c.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Les Wexner’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein was not casual, fleeting, or peripheral. It was foundational. Wexner, the billionaire founder of L Brands and longtime head of Victoria’s Secret, handed Epstein extraordinary financial authority in the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Les Wexner’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein was not casual, fleeting, or peripheral. It was foundational. Wexner, the billionaire founder of L Brands and longtime head of Victoria’s Secret, handed Epstein extraordinary financial authority in the late 1980s, granting him sweeping power of attorney over his fortune—an almost unheard-of concession for a man with no formal wealth management credentials and a murky background. Epstein was not just an adviser; he was embedded. He controlled Wexner’s money, managed properties, and reportedly inserted himself into the culture of Wexner’s corporate empire, particularly as it related to the Victoria’s Secret modeling world that conveniently overlapped with Epstein’s trafficking pipeline. The transfer of a Manhattan townhouse—one of the largest private residences in the city—to Epstein for a nominal sum remains one of the most glaring symbols of that patronage. For years, Wexner allowed Epstein to operate under his name and prestige, giving Epstein the legitimacy that opened doors in finance, academia, politics, and philanthropy. Epstein’s entire aura of elite credibility can be traced in large part to the halo effect of Wexner’s wealth and status.<br /><br /><br />After Epstein’s 2006 arrest and especially following the 2019 federal charges, Wexner abruptly attempted to recast himself as a victim—claiming Epstein had betrayed him, stolen from him, and misled him. He publicly severed ties, issued statements of regret, and emphasized that Epstein had been removed from his financial role years earlier. But that narrative strains credibility. Wexner was not an unsophisticated investor duped by a charming con man; he was one of the most powerful retail magnates in America with access to the best legal and financial minds in the world. The idea that Epstein could operate for years under his authority without scrutiny reflects either willful blindness or a level of negligence that borders on complicity. Wexner’s late-stage distancing felt less like moral clarity and more like reputational triage once the full scope of Epstein’s crimes became undeniable. His patronage built Epstein’s empire. His disavowal came only after the empire collapsed in public view.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2571</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Courtney Wild And Her Jeffrey  Epstein Related Deposition From 2017 (Part 8)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/courtney-wild-and-her-jeffrey-epstein-related-deposition-from-2017-part-8--72604371</link><description><![CDATA[In the 2017 video deposition of Courtney E. Wild, taken as part of the civil case Epstein v. Rothstein in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Wild testified under oath about her personal background, criminal history, and relevant circumstances before the court began substantive questions. The early portion of the deposition focuses on Wild’s identity and personal history, including her marriage, family situation, and her own past convictions, including a drug trafficking conviction for which she was serving a sentence at the Gadsden Correctional Facility in Florida at the time of the deposition. Wild was sworn in and answered basic biographical questions about her life prior to moving into the heart of the civil litigation against Epstein’s representatives and others, establishing her presence and credibility as a witness in the case’s factual record<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Epstein%20v.%20Rothstein,%20No.%2050-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB%20(Fla.%2015th%20Cir.%20Ct.%202009)/1027.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1027.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72604371</guid><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 04:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72604371/araoz8.mp3" length="12155550" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/49b5365d-2ec7-4223-b652-0e10fa37be9e/49b5365d-2ec7-4223-b652-0e10fa37be9e.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/49b5365d-2ec7-4223-b652-0e10fa37be9e/49b5365d-2ec7-4223-b652-0e10fa37be9e.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/49b5365d-2ec7-4223-b652-0e10fa37be9e/49b5365d-2ec7-4223-b652-0e10fa37be9e.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In the 2017 video deposition of Courtney E. Wild, taken as part of the civil case Epstein v. Rothstein in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Wild testified under oath about her personal background, criminal history, and relevant...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In the 2017 video deposition of Courtney E. Wild, taken as part of the civil case Epstein v. Rothstein in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Wild testified under oath about her personal background, criminal history, and relevant circumstances before the court began substantive questions. The early portion of the deposition focuses on Wild’s identity and personal history, including her marriage, family situation, and her own past convictions, including a drug trafficking conviction for which she was serving a sentence at the Gadsden Correctional Facility in Florida at the time of the deposition. Wild was sworn in and answered basic biographical questions about her life prior to moving into the heart of the civil litigation against Epstein’s representatives and others, establishing her presence and credibility as a witness in the case’s factual record<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Epstein%20v.%20Rothstein,%20No.%2050-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB%20(Fla.%2015th%20Cir.%20Ct.%202009)/1027.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1027.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>760</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Courtney Wild And Her Jeffrey  Epstein Related Deposition From 2017 (Part 7)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/courtney-wild-and-her-jeffrey-epstein-related-deposition-from-2017-part-7--72604343</link><description><![CDATA[In the 2017 video deposition of Courtney E. Wild, taken as part of the civil case Epstein v. Rothstein in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Wild testified under oath about her personal background, criminal history, and relevant circumstances before the court began substantive questions. The early portion of the deposition focuses on Wild’s identity and personal history, including her marriage, family situation, and her own past convictions, including a drug trafficking conviction for which she was serving a sentence at the Gadsden Correctional Facility in Florida at the time of the deposition. Wild was sworn in and answered basic biographical questions about her life prior to moving into the heart of the civil litigation against Epstein’s representatives and others, establishing her presence and credibility as a witness in the case’s factual record<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Epstein%20v.%20Rothstein,%20No.%2050-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB%20(Fla.%2015th%20Cir.%20Ct.%202009)/1027.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1027.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72604343</guid><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 02:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72604343/courtneywilddeposition7.mp3" length="12669222" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2900c78e-3b89-432f-b74a-895ece45c802/2900c78e-3b89-432f-b74a-895ece45c802.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2900c78e-3b89-432f-b74a-895ece45c802/2900c78e-3b89-432f-b74a-895ece45c802.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2900c78e-3b89-432f-b74a-895ece45c802/2900c78e-3b89-432f-b74a-895ece45c802.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In the 2017 video deposition of Courtney E. Wild, taken as part of the civil case Epstein v. Rothstein in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Wild testified under oath about her personal background, criminal history, and relevant...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In the 2017 video deposition of Courtney E. Wild, taken as part of the civil case Epstein v. Rothstein in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Wild testified under oath about her personal background, criminal history, and relevant circumstances before the court began substantive questions. The early portion of the deposition focuses on Wild’s identity and personal history, including her marriage, family situation, and her own past convictions, including a drug trafficking conviction for which she was serving a sentence at the Gadsden Correctional Facility in Florida at the time of the deposition. Wild was sworn in and answered basic biographical questions about her life prior to moving into the heart of the civil litigation against Epstein’s representatives and others, establishing her presence and credibility as a witness in the case’s factual record<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Epstein%20v.%20Rothstein,%20No.%2050-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB%20(Fla.%2015th%20Cir.%20Ct.%202009)/1027.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1027.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>792</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Courtney Wild And Her Jeffrey  Epstein Related Deposition From 2017 (Part 6)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/courtney-wild-and-her-jeffrey-epstein-related-deposition-from-2017-part-6--72604347</link><description><![CDATA[In the 2017 video deposition of Courtney E. Wild, taken as part of the civil case Epstein v. Rothstein in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Wild testified under oath about her personal background, criminal history, and relevant circumstances before the court began substantive questions. The early portion of the deposition focuses on Wild’s identity and personal history, including her marriage, family situation, and her own past convictions, including a drug trafficking conviction for which she was serving a sentence at the Gadsden Correctional Facility in Florida at the time of the deposition. Wild was sworn in and answered basic biographical questions about her life prior to moving into the heart of the civil litigation against Epstein’s representatives and others, establishing her presence and credibility as a witness in the case’s factual record<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Epstein%20v.%20Rothstein,%20No.%2050-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB%20(Fla.%2015th%20Cir.%20Ct.%202009)/1027.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1027.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72604347</guid><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 00:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72604347/courtneywilddeposition6.mp3" length="12004667" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/01ef058e-820a-4405-b0db-34946c82bd78/01ef058e-820a-4405-b0db-34946c82bd78.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/01ef058e-820a-4405-b0db-34946c82bd78/01ef058e-820a-4405-b0db-34946c82bd78.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/01ef058e-820a-4405-b0db-34946c82bd78/01ef058e-820a-4405-b0db-34946c82bd78.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In the 2017 video deposition of Courtney E. Wild, taken as part of the civil case Epstein v. Rothstein in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Wild testified under oath about her personal background, criminal history, and relevant...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In the 2017 video deposition of Courtney E. Wild, taken as part of the civil case Epstein v. Rothstein in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Wild testified under oath about her personal background, criminal history, and relevant circumstances before the court began substantive questions. The early portion of the deposition focuses on Wild’s identity and personal history, including her marriage, family situation, and her own past convictions, including a drug trafficking conviction for which she was serving a sentence at the Gadsden Correctional Facility in Florida at the time of the deposition. Wild was sworn in and answered basic biographical questions about her life prior to moving into the heart of the civil litigation against Epstein’s representatives and others, establishing her presence and credibility as a witness in the case’s factual record<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Epstein%20v.%20Rothstein,%20No.%2050-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB%20(Fla.%2015th%20Cir.%20Ct.%202009)/1027.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1027.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>751</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Courtney Wild And Her Jeffrey  Epstein Related Deposition From 2017 (Part 5)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/courtney-wild-and-her-jeffrey-epstein-related-deposition-from-2017-part-5--72604345</link><description><![CDATA[In the 2017 video deposition of Courtney E. Wild, taken as part of the civil case Epstein v. Rothstein in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Wild testified under oath about her personal background, criminal history, and relevant circumstances before the court began substantive questions. The early portion of the deposition focuses on Wild’s identity and personal history, including her marriage, family situation, and her own past convictions, including a drug trafficking conviction for which she was serving a sentence at the Gadsden Correctional Facility in Florida at the time of the deposition. Wild was sworn in and answered basic biographical questions about her life prior to moving into the heart of the civil litigation against Epstein’s representatives and others, establishing her presence and credibility as a witness in the case’s factual record<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Epstein%20v.%20Rothstein,%20No.%2050-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB%20(Fla.%2015th%20Cir.%20Ct.%202009)/1027.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1027.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72604345</guid><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 22:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72604345/courtneywilddeposition5.mp3" length="12200272" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/dfc2325c-79ca-4176-a083-d1d93c9490cd/dfc2325c-79ca-4176-a083-d1d93c9490cd.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/dfc2325c-79ca-4176-a083-d1d93c9490cd/dfc2325c-79ca-4176-a083-d1d93c9490cd.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/dfc2325c-79ca-4176-a083-d1d93c9490cd/dfc2325c-79ca-4176-a083-d1d93c9490cd.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In the 2017 video deposition of Courtney E. Wild, taken as part of the civil case Epstein v. Rothstein in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Wild testified under oath about her personal background, criminal history, and relevant...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In the 2017 video deposition of Courtney E. Wild, taken as part of the civil case Epstein v. Rothstein in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Wild testified under oath about her personal background, criminal history, and relevant circumstances before the court began substantive questions. The early portion of the deposition focuses on Wild’s identity and personal history, including her marriage, family situation, and her own past convictions, including a drug trafficking conviction for which she was serving a sentence at the Gadsden Correctional Facility in Florida at the time of the deposition. Wild was sworn in and answered basic biographical questions about her life prior to moving into the heart of the civil litigation against Epstein’s representatives and others, establishing her presence and credibility as a witness in the case’s factual record<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Epstein%20v.%20Rothstein,%20No.%2050-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB%20(Fla.%2015th%20Cir.%20Ct.%202009)/1027.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1027.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>763</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The UK Inquiry Into Grooming Gangs:  Introduction And Executive Summary (6/20/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-uk-inquiry-into-grooming-gangs-introduction-and-executive-summary-6-20-26--72611438</link><description><![CDATA[Rupert Lowe’s inquiry says it received evidence from survivors, relatives, whistleblowers, professionals and political figures about organised child sexual exploitation in communities across the United Kingdom. The report describes a recurring pattern in which vulnerable girls were targeted with attention, gifts, alcohol and drugs before being subjected to sexual violence, intimidation and trafficking between offenders and locations. It states that the victims discussed in the evidence were predominantly white British girls and that many of the alleged perpetrators were men of Pakistani Muslim heritage. The inquiry says the abuse was allowed to continue because police forces, social services, schools, healthcare providers, licensing authorities and government bodies repeatedly failed to identify victims, share information, investigate allegations properly or intervene when clear warning signs appeared.<br /><br />The report calls for mandatory reporting of suspected child sexual exploitation, improved collection of demographic information about victims and offenders, specialist police units and a consistent national system for sharing safeguarding intelligence. It also recommends regular training for police officers, teachers, medical staff and social workers; automatic referrals when children present with injuries, pregnancies, sexually transmitted infections, self-harm or other indicators of exploitation; and long-term medical, psychological, housing and legal support for survivors. Additional recommendations include reviewing convictions imposed on children who committed offences while being exploited, stronger sentencing, deportation proceedings against convicted foreign nationals where legally applicable, and legal action against perpetrators or officials believed to have escaped accountability.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://static1.squarespace.com/static/6810978a41bbc42489eafa81/t/6a314bb1151e511944bd4421/1781615537601/The+Rape+Gang+Inquiry+Report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Rape Gang Inquiry Report.docx</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72611438</guid><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 20:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72611438/ukgrooming1.mp3" length="15069980" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/248108c3-cca0-4f6b-b117-9646c1e4751e/248108c3-cca0-4f6b-b117-9646c1e4751e.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/248108c3-cca0-4f6b-b117-9646c1e4751e/248108c3-cca0-4f6b-b117-9646c1e4751e.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/248108c3-cca0-4f6b-b117-9646c1e4751e/248108c3-cca0-4f6b-b117-9646c1e4751e.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Rupert Lowe’s inquiry says it received evidence from survivors, relatives, whistleblowers, professionals and political figures about organised child sexual exploitation in communities across the United Kingdom. The report describes a recurring pattern...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Rupert Lowe’s inquiry says it received evidence from survivors, relatives, whistleblowers, professionals and political figures about organised child sexual exploitation in communities across the United Kingdom. The report describes a recurring pattern in which vulnerable girls were targeted with attention, gifts, alcohol and drugs before being subjected to sexual violence, intimidation and trafficking between offenders and locations. It states that the victims discussed in the evidence were predominantly white British girls and that many of the alleged perpetrators were men of Pakistani Muslim heritage. The inquiry says the abuse was allowed to continue because police forces, social services, schools, healthcare providers, licensing authorities and government bodies repeatedly failed to identify victims, share information, investigate allegations properly or intervene when clear warning signs appeared.<br /><br />The report calls for mandatory reporting of suspected child sexual exploitation, improved collection of demographic information about victims and offenders, specialist police units and a consistent national system for sharing safeguarding intelligence. It also recommends regular training for police officers, teachers, medical staff and social workers; automatic referrals when children present with injuries, pregnancies, sexually transmitted infections, self-harm or other indicators of exploitation; and long-term medical, psychological, housing and legal support for survivors. Additional recommendations include reviewing convictions imposed on children who committed offences while being exploited, stronger sentencing, deportation proceedings against convicted foreign nationals where legally applicable, and legal action against perpetrators or officials believed to have escaped accountability.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://static1.squarespace.com/static/6810978a41bbc42489eafa81/t/6a314bb1151e511944bd4421/1781615537601/The+Rape+Gang+Inquiry+Report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Rape Gang Inquiry Report.docx</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>942</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>britishnews,britishpolitics,coverup,england,groomingganginquiry,groominggangs,groominggangscandal,labour,labourparty,london,mandatoryreporting,news,rochdalegroomingscandal,rupertlowe,scotlandyard,starmer,survivortestimony,torry,uk,unitedkingdom</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Tova Noel And The Transcript From Her Congressional Testimony (Part 2) (6/20/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/tova-noel-and-the-transcript-from-her-congressional-testimony-part-2-6-20-26--72611436</link><description><![CDATA[Tova Noel, one of the two correctional officers assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center’s Special Housing Unit on the night Jeffrey Epstein died, told the House Oversight Committee that she failed to conduct the required inmate checks and later signed records falsely indicating that the rounds had been completed. Noel described an understaffed, poorly managed facility in which she was exhausted, inadequately trained and assigned duties beyond her normal responsibilities. She maintained that she last saw Epstein alive during the evening medication round and observed nothing that made her believe he was preparing to harm himself. Noel also testified that Epstein received unusual accommodations, including extra bed linens, a CPAP machine and access to medication that appeared different from the treatment ordinarily given to other prisoners.<br /><br />Noel denied having any role in Epstein’s death, receiving money in connection with him or knowing anything about an alleged payment to facilitate access to his cell. She also rejected claims that she was the unidentified orange-colored figure seen moving toward Epstein’s tier at approximately 10:39 p.m., insisting that she never returned to the area and could not explain what—or who—the surveillance image showed. Although Noel said she believed Epstein died by suicide because he was supposedly alone inside the cell, her testimony did little to resolve the most important unanswered questions: why required checks were abandoned, why Epstein remained without a cellmate, who or what appeared near the tier, and how so many security procedures failed simultaneously. Instead, her account reinforced the picture of extraordinary negligence, special treatment and institutional dysfunction surrounding the death of the most consequential prisoner in federal custody.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72611436</guid><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 18:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72611436/tovanoelcongresstranscript2.mp3" length="11954094" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e4a5e33b-e34f-4105-b6da-45b4082bef7e/e4a5e33b-e34f-4105-b6da-45b4082bef7e.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e4a5e33b-e34f-4105-b6da-45b4082bef7e/e4a5e33b-e34f-4105-b6da-45b4082bef7e.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e4a5e33b-e34f-4105-b6da-45b4082bef7e/e4a5e33b-e34f-4105-b6da-45b4082bef7e.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Tova Noel, one of the two correctional officers assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center’s Special Housing Unit on the night Jeffrey Epstein died, told the House Oversight Committee that she failed to conduct the required inmate checks and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Tova Noel, one of the two correctional officers assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center’s Special Housing Unit on the night Jeffrey Epstein died, told the House Oversight Committee that she failed to conduct the required inmate checks and later signed records falsely indicating that the rounds had been completed. Noel described an understaffed, poorly managed facility in which she was exhausted, inadequately trained and assigned duties beyond her normal responsibilities. She maintained that she last saw Epstein alive during the evening medication round and observed nothing that made her believe he was preparing to harm himself. Noel also testified that Epstein received unusual accommodations, including extra bed linens, a CPAP machine and access to medication that appeared different from the treatment ordinarily given to other prisoners.<br /><br />Noel denied having any role in Epstein’s death, receiving money in connection with him or knowing anything about an alleged payment to facilitate access to his cell. She also rejected claims that she was the unidentified orange-colored figure seen moving toward Epstein’s tier at approximately 10:39 p.m., insisting that she never returned to the area and could not explain what—or who—the surveillance image showed. Although Noel said she believed Epstein died by suicide because he was supposedly alone inside the cell, her testimony did little to resolve the most important unanswered questions: why required checks were abandoned, why Epstein remained without a cellmate, who or what appeared near the tier, and how so many security procedures failed simultaneously. Instead, her account reinforced the picture of extraordinary negligence, special treatment and institutional dysfunction surrounding the death of the most consequential prisoner in federal custody.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>748</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Tova Noel And The Transcript From Her Congressional Testimony (Part 1) (6/20/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/tova-noel-and-the-transcript-from-her-congressional-testimony-part-1-6-20-26--72611435</link><description><![CDATA[Tova Noel, one of the two correctional officers assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center’s Special Housing Unit on the night Jeffrey Epstein died, told the House Oversight Committee that she failed to conduct the required inmate checks and later signed records falsely indicating that the rounds had been completed. Noel described an understaffed, poorly managed facility in which she was exhausted, inadequately trained and assigned duties beyond her normal responsibilities. She maintained that she last saw Epstein alive during the evening medication round and observed nothing that made her believe he was preparing to harm himself. Noel also testified that Epstein received unusual accommodations, including extra bed linens, a CPAP machine and access to medication that appeared different from the treatment ordinarily given to other prisoners.<br /><br />Noel denied having any role in Epstein’s death, receiving money in connection with him or knowing anything about an alleged payment to facilitate access to his cell. She also rejected claims that she was the unidentified orange-colored figure seen moving toward Epstein’s tier at approximately 10:39 p.m., insisting that she never returned to the area and could not explain what—or who—the surveillance image showed. Although Noel said she believed Epstein died by suicide because he was supposedly alone inside the cell, her testimony did little to resolve the most important unanswered questions: why required checks were abandoned, why Epstein remained without a cellmate, who or what appeared near the tier, and how so many security procedures failed simultaneously. Instead, her account reinforced the picture of extraordinary negligence, special treatment and institutional dysfunction surrounding the death of the most consequential prisoner in federal custody.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72611435</guid><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 16:15:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72611435/tovanoelcongresstranscript1.mp3" length="16113624" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cde5da89-fb6c-46de-8625-24edb82af843/cde5da89-fb6c-46de-8625-24edb82af843.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cde5da89-fb6c-46de-8625-24edb82af843/cde5da89-fb6c-46de-8625-24edb82af843.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cde5da89-fb6c-46de-8625-24edb82af843/cde5da89-fb6c-46de-8625-24edb82af843.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Tova Noel, one of the two correctional officers assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center’s Special Housing Unit on the night Jeffrey Epstein died, told the House Oversight Committee that she failed to conduct the required inmate checks and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Tova Noel, one of the two correctional officers assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center’s Special Housing Unit on the night Jeffrey Epstein died, told the House Oversight Committee that she failed to conduct the required inmate checks and later signed records falsely indicating that the rounds had been completed. Noel described an understaffed, poorly managed facility in which she was exhausted, inadequately trained and assigned duties beyond her normal responsibilities. She maintained that she last saw Epstein alive during the evening medication round and observed nothing that made her believe he was preparing to harm himself. Noel also testified that Epstein received unusual accommodations, including extra bed linens, a CPAP machine and access to medication that appeared different from the treatment ordinarily given to other prisoners.<br /><br />Noel denied having any role in Epstein’s death, receiving money in connection with him or knowing anything about an alleged payment to facilitate access to his cell. She also rejected claims that she was the unidentified orange-colored figure seen moving toward Epstein’s tier at approximately 10:39 p.m., insisting that she never returned to the area and could not explain what—or who—the surveillance image showed. Although Noel said she believed Epstein died by suicide because he was supposedly alone inside the cell, her testimony did little to resolve the most important unanswered questions: why required checks were abandoned, why Epstein remained without a cellmate, who or what appeared near the tier, and how so many security procedures failed simultaneously. Instead, her account reinforced the picture of extraordinary negligence, special treatment and institutional dysfunction surrounding the death of the most consequential prisoner in federal custody.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1008</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Bill Gates, The Endless Apologies And The CNN Interview (6/20/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bill-gates-the-endless-apologies-and-the-cnn-interview-6-20-26--72604566</link><description><![CDATA[Bill Gates’s attempts at damage control over his ties to Jeffrey Epstein have always sounded less like sincere apologies and more like carefully worded PR spin. He repeatedly leaned on the same tired line that he “made a mistake” by meeting Epstein, as if multiple visits, a cozy dinner at Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse, and repeated interactions could somehow be reduced to a one-off lapse in judgment. His apologies are weasel-like because they dodge the central issue: Gates didn’t just bump into Epstein—he engaged with him knowingly, long after Epstein was a convicted sex offender. Instead of admitting that he chose power networking over morality, he frames it as a regrettable oversight, a minor slip in judgment, as though the public should simply nod along and accept that excuse.<br /><br /><br />Even worse, Gates couches his apologies in a tone of self-pity, acting as though he’s the real victim because people keep asking him about it. Rather than grappling with the disgust of survivors who know exactly what Epstein was, Gates seems more concerned about how the association tarnishes his image and legacy. He wants the world to believe that his proximity to a predator was an innocent blunder, when in reality it was deliberate and calculated—Epstein had money, connections, and a reputation Gates clearly found useful. The result is an apology that reeks of arrogance and evasion, a weasel-like maneuver to deflect blame while never fully owning the gravity of choosing to keep company with a man everyone knew was radioactive.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72604566</guid><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 14:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72604566/megabillgatesinterviews.mp3" length="66138795" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/be053512-34d8-4d8d-9199-4855769e18d9/be053512-34d8-4d8d-9199-4855769e18d9.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/be053512-34d8-4d8d-9199-4855769e18d9/be053512-34d8-4d8d-9199-4855769e18d9.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/be053512-34d8-4d8d-9199-4855769e18d9/be053512-34d8-4d8d-9199-4855769e18d9.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Bill Gates’s attempts at damage control over his ties to Jeffrey Epstein have always sounded less like sincere apologies and more like carefully worded PR spin. He repeatedly leaned on the same tired line that he “made a mistake” by meeting Epstein,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Bill Gates’s attempts at damage control over his ties to Jeffrey Epstein have always sounded less like sincere apologies and more like carefully worded PR spin. He repeatedly leaned on the same tired line that he “made a mistake” by meeting Epstein, as if multiple visits, a cozy dinner at Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse, and repeated interactions could somehow be reduced to a one-off lapse in judgment. His apologies are weasel-like because they dodge the central issue: Gates didn’t just bump into Epstein—he engaged with him knowingly, long after Epstein was a convicted sex offender. Instead of admitting that he chose power networking over morality, he frames it as a regrettable oversight, a minor slip in judgment, as though the public should simply nod along and accept that excuse.<br /><br /><br />Even worse, Gates couches his apologies in a tone of self-pity, acting as though he’s the real victim because people keep asking him about it. Rather than grappling with the disgust of survivors who know exactly what Epstein was, Gates seems more concerned about how the association tarnishes his image and legacy. He wants the world to believe that his proximity to a predator was an innocent blunder, when in reality it was deliberate and calculated—Epstein had money, connections, and a reputation Gates clearly found useful. The result is an apology that reeks of arrogance and evasion, a weasel-like maneuver to deflect blame while never fully owning the gravity of choosing to keep company with a man everyone knew was radioactive.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4134</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Jeffrey Epstein, Stacey Plaskett, and the Media Blackout (6/20/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-stacey-plaskett-and-the-media-blackout-6-20-26--72604622</link><description><![CDATA[The silence surrounding Stacey Plaskett’s lawsuit by Epstein survivors exposes the staggering hypocrisy of both lawmakers and the legacy media. Politicians who pound the table about justice and accountability fall mute when the accusations land inside their own chamber. Journalists who dissect every lurid detail of Epstein’s life suddenly find no headlines when survivors point to a sitting member of Congress. This selective outrage isn’t oversight—it’s complicity. Survivors are abandoned the moment their stories threaten insiders, and the system shows once again that accountability is conditional, not principled.<br /><br /><br />That selective accountability corrodes credibility and turns justice into theater. By politicizing the scandal, lawmakers use survivors as pawns while letting the real villains—Epstein’s network of enablers—slip quietly back into the shadows. The result is a collapse of trust: citizens see investigations as performance, predators learn power protects power, and survivors are betrayed all over again. Epstein may be dead and Maxwell imprisoned, but the system that shielded them is alive and well—sustained by cowardice, silence, and the hypocrisy of institutions that pretend to defend justice while practicing selective blindness.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact  me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72604622</guid><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 12:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72604622/megaplasketthypocrisy.mp3" length="26030959" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0980d3c3-8c9a-4abd-922b-29d4644ffd5a/0980d3c3-8c9a-4abd-922b-29d4644ffd5a.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0980d3c3-8c9a-4abd-922b-29d4644ffd5a/0980d3c3-8c9a-4abd-922b-29d4644ffd5a.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0980d3c3-8c9a-4abd-922b-29d4644ffd5a/0980d3c3-8c9a-4abd-922b-29d4644ffd5a.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The silence surrounding Stacey Plaskett’s lawsuit by Epstein survivors exposes the staggering hypocrisy of both lawmakers and the legacy media. Politicians who pound the table about justice and accountability fall mute when the accusations land inside...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The silence surrounding Stacey Plaskett’s lawsuit by Epstein survivors exposes the staggering hypocrisy of both lawmakers and the legacy media. Politicians who pound the table about justice and accountability fall mute when the accusations land inside their own chamber. Journalists who dissect every lurid detail of Epstein’s life suddenly find no headlines when survivors point to a sitting member of Congress. This selective outrage isn’t oversight—it’s complicity. Survivors are abandoned the moment their stories threaten insiders, and the system shows once again that accountability is conditional, not principled.<br /><br /><br />That selective accountability corrodes credibility and turns justice into theater. By politicizing the scandal, lawmakers use survivors as pawns while letting the real villains—Epstein’s network of enablers—slip quietly back into the shadows. The result is a collapse of trust: citizens see investigations as performance, predators learn power protects power, and survivors are betrayed all over again. Epstein may be dead and Maxwell imprisoned, but the system that shielded them is alive and well—sustained by cowardice, silence, and the hypocrisy of institutions that pretend to defend justice while practicing selective blindness.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact  me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1627</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Jes Staley Admits To Having Consensual "Relations" With An Epstein "Assistant (6/20/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jes-staley-admits-to-having-consensual-relations-with-an-epstein-assistant-6-20-26--72604619</link><description><![CDATA[Jes Staley, the former Barclays CEO and longtime JPMorgan executive, admitted during legal proceedings and regulatory scrutiny that he had engaged in consensual sexual relations with one of Jeffrey Epstein’s assistants. Staley has maintained that the relationship was consensual and separate from any criminal conduct tied to Epstein’s trafficking enterprise. However, the admission became a flashpoint because it directly contradicted earlier public statements in which Staley sought to minimize the depth and nature of his association with Epstein. Court filings and internal communications revealed that Staley’s relationship with Epstein was more extensive than initially portrayed, including visits to Epstein properties after Epstein’s 2008 conviction. The acknowledgment of a sexual relationship with an employee inside Epstein’s orbit has intensified scrutiny over what Staley knew about Epstein’s operations and whether he exercised appropriate judgment as a senior banking executive entrusted with safeguarding institutional integrity.<br /><br />In the aftermath of the broader Epstein file revelations, calls have grown louder for regulators and law enforcement to more fully investigate Staley’s conduct. Critics argue that his proximity to Epstein, combined with inconsistencies between his private communications and public statements, raises serious questions about transparency and oversight at the highest levels of global finance. UK regulators have already taken action related to how Staley characterized his ties to Epstein, and additional revelations from unsealed documents have fueled renewed demands for deeper inquiry. Advocacy groups and some lawmakers contend that anyone who maintained a close relationship with Epstein—particularly after his first conviction—should face thorough review, not only for potential criminal exposure but for failures of governance and ethical responsibility. The Staley episode has become emblematic of the broader reckoning unfolding across financial and political elites as more information tied to Epstein’s network continues to surface.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72604619</guid><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72604619/megajesstaleyadmits.mp3" length="38646639" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f937094e-ddac-431e-8ff4-3b9cc8feab3a/f937094e-ddac-431e-8ff4-3b9cc8feab3a.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f937094e-ddac-431e-8ff4-3b9cc8feab3a/f937094e-ddac-431e-8ff4-3b9cc8feab3a.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f937094e-ddac-431e-8ff4-3b9cc8feab3a/f937094e-ddac-431e-8ff4-3b9cc8feab3a.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jes Staley, the former Barclays CEO and longtime JPMorgan executive, admitted during legal proceedings and regulatory scrutiny that he had engaged in consensual sexual relations with one of Jeffrey Epstein’s assistants. Staley has maintained that the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jes Staley, the former Barclays CEO and longtime JPMorgan executive, admitted during legal proceedings and regulatory scrutiny that he had engaged in consensual sexual relations with one of Jeffrey Epstein’s assistants. Staley has maintained that the relationship was consensual and separate from any criminal conduct tied to Epstein’s trafficking enterprise. However, the admission became a flashpoint because it directly contradicted earlier public statements in which Staley sought to minimize the depth and nature of his association with Epstein. Court filings and internal communications revealed that Staley’s relationship with Epstein was more extensive than initially portrayed, including visits to Epstein properties after Epstein’s 2008 conviction. The acknowledgment of a sexual relationship with an employee inside Epstein’s orbit has intensified scrutiny over what Staley knew about Epstein’s operations and whether he exercised appropriate judgment as a senior banking executive entrusted with safeguarding institutional integrity.<br /><br />In the aftermath of the broader Epstein file revelations, calls have grown louder for regulators and law enforcement to more fully investigate Staley’s conduct. Critics argue that his proximity to Epstein, combined with inconsistencies between his private communications and public statements, raises serious questions about transparency and oversight at the highest levels of global finance. UK regulators have already taken action related to how Staley characterized his ties to Epstein, and additional revelations from unsealed documents have fueled renewed demands for deeper inquiry. Advocacy groups and some lawmakers contend that anyone who maintained a close relationship with Epstein—particularly after his first conviction—should face thorough review, not only for potential criminal exposure but for failures of governance and ethical responsibility. The Staley episode has become emblematic of the broader reckoning unfolding across financial and political elites as more information tied to Epstein’s network continues to surface.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2416</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Why Jeffrey Epstein’s Noncompliance Should Have Voided His NPA  (6/20/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-why-jeffrey-epstein-s-noncompliance-should-have-voided-his-npa-6-20-26--72604621</link><description><![CDATA[Taken as a whole, the plea conference transcript documents the formal moment when Jeffrey Epstein secured an unusually favorable resolution to serious felony charges, one that was explicitly premised on compliance with strict custodial and supervisory conditions. The court accepted the plea on the understanding that Epstein would serve meaningful jail time, submit to sex-offender designation, comply with supervision, and abide by restrictions meant to prevent further harm. On paper, the agreement was presented as a final, enforceable resolution that balanced punishment with accountability, and the court relied on representations that Epstein would follow those terms in full.<br /><br /><br />With the benefit of hindsight, it is now clear that those assumptions did not hold. Epstein’s subsequent treatment and behavior—his hollowed-out incarceration, continued privileges, and apparent disregard for key restrictions—call into question whether the plea terms were ever genuinely satisfied. That breakdown matters because the plea deal and the related non-prosecution agreement were conditional arrangements, dependent on good-faith compliance. When viewed in this broader context, the transcript reads not as a clean conclusion, but as the starting point of a failed enforcement process that allowed the protections of the deal to remain in place despite evidence that its core requirements were not being met.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.317867/gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.463.3.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.463.3.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72604621</guid><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 08:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72604621/meganoncompliancenpa.mp3" length="39669804" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/145014cd-0846-4b79-aae2-c2571d6ce24c/145014cd-0846-4b79-aae2-c2571d6ce24c.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/145014cd-0846-4b79-aae2-c2571d6ce24c/145014cd-0846-4b79-aae2-c2571d6ce24c.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/145014cd-0846-4b79-aae2-c2571d6ce24c/145014cd-0846-4b79-aae2-c2571d6ce24c.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Taken as a whole, the plea conference transcript documents the formal moment when Jeffrey Epstein secured an unusually favorable resolution to serious felony charges, one that was explicitly premised on compliance with strict custodial and supervisory...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Taken as a whole, the plea conference transcript documents the formal moment when Jeffrey Epstein secured an unusually favorable resolution to serious felony charges, one that was explicitly premised on compliance with strict custodial and supervisory conditions. The court accepted the plea on the understanding that Epstein would serve meaningful jail time, submit to sex-offender designation, comply with supervision, and abide by restrictions meant to prevent further harm. On paper, the agreement was presented as a final, enforceable resolution that balanced punishment with accountability, and the court relied on representations that Epstein would follow those terms in full.<br /><br /><br />With the benefit of hindsight, it is now clear that those assumptions did not hold. Epstein’s subsequent treatment and behavior—his hollowed-out incarceration, continued privileges, and apparent disregard for key restrictions—call into question whether the plea terms were ever genuinely satisfied. That breakdown matters because the plea deal and the related non-prosecution agreement were conditional arrangements, dependent on good-faith compliance. When viewed in this broader context, the transcript reads not as a clean conclusion, but as the starting point of a failed enforcement process that allowed the protections of the deal to remain in place despite evidence that its core requirements were not being met.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.317867/gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.463.3.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.463.3.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2480</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   Les Wexner, The Epstein Accusations And The Built In Escape Hatch (6/19/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-les-wexner-the-epstein-accusations-and-the-built-in-escape-hatch-6-19-26--72604565</link><description><![CDATA[Leslie Wexner, the billionaire founder of L Brands (which once included Victoria’s Secret), has publicly claimed that Jeffrey Epstein betrayed his trust by misappropriating vast sums of money and engaging in unauthorized financial dealings on his behalf. According to Wexner’s account, Epstein was given broad authority over parts of his financial and personal affairs in the 1990s and early 2000s, which he later said Epstein exploited for personal gain. Wexner has suggested that Epstein used that trust to essentially enrich himself—reportedly diverting assets and profiting from deals without clear documentation or approval. This purported betrayal, in Wexner’s telling, was one of the factors that ultimately ended Epstein’s professional relationship with him. Wexner has characterized the financial conduct as deceitful and exploitative, suggesting Epstein’s financial acumen was a smokescreen for self-enrichment at Wexner’s expense.<br /><br />However, a skeptical reading of this narrative raises several unresolved questions and inconsistencies. For one, some details about the scope and mechanics of the alleged financial misconduct remain vague or unverified in public records, leading observers to wonder whether the claims reflect specific documented thefts or a broader, more generalized sense of “being cheated.” Epstein today is often portrayed as having inflated his financial expertise; this has led some analysts to speculate that any discrepancies in Wexner’s accounts might stem less from theft and more from sloppy bookkeeping, mutual misunderstanding, or projection after the relationship soured. Additionally, because Wexner’s statements have sometimes appeared defensive or self-serving—emphasizing his own victimization—the possibility arises that the narrative simplifies or amplifies elements of the relationship to deflect scrutiny from his judgment in empowering Epstein in the first place. Until more concrete evidence is produced, the precise nature and extent of any alleged financial misconduct by Epstein toward Wexner remains a subject of debate rather than settled fact.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72604565</guid><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72604565/megawexneraccusesepsteintheft.mp3" length="36326966" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d3ee5ef0-551f-4454-9570-e7d3385243e5/d3ee5ef0-551f-4454-9570-e7d3385243e5.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d3ee5ef0-551f-4454-9570-e7d3385243e5/d3ee5ef0-551f-4454-9570-e7d3385243e5.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d3ee5ef0-551f-4454-9570-e7d3385243e5/d3ee5ef0-551f-4454-9570-e7d3385243e5.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Leslie Wexner, the billionaire founder of L Brands (which once included Victoria’s Secret), has publicly claimed that Jeffrey Epstein betrayed his trust by misappropriating vast sums of money and engaging in unauthorized financial dealings on his...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Leslie Wexner, the billionaire founder of L Brands (which once included Victoria’s Secret), has publicly claimed that Jeffrey Epstein betrayed his trust by misappropriating vast sums of money and engaging in unauthorized financial dealings on his behalf. According to Wexner’s account, Epstein was given broad authority over parts of his financial and personal affairs in the 1990s and early 2000s, which he later said Epstein exploited for personal gain. Wexner has suggested that Epstein used that trust to essentially enrich himself—reportedly diverting assets and profiting from deals without clear documentation or approval. This purported betrayal, in Wexner’s telling, was one of the factors that ultimately ended Epstein’s professional relationship with him. Wexner has characterized the financial conduct as deceitful and exploitative, suggesting Epstein’s financial acumen was a smokescreen for self-enrichment at Wexner’s expense.<br /><br />However, a skeptical reading of this narrative raises several unresolved questions and inconsistencies. For one, some details about the scope and mechanics of the alleged financial misconduct remain vague or unverified in public records, leading observers to wonder whether the claims reflect specific documented thefts or a broader, more generalized sense of “being cheated.” Epstein today is often portrayed as having inflated his financial expertise; this has led some analysts to speculate that any discrepancies in Wexner’s accounts might stem less from theft and more from sloppy bookkeeping, mutual misunderstanding, or projection after the relationship soured. Additionally, because Wexner’s statements have sometimes appeared defensive or self-serving—emphasizing his own victimization—the possibility arises that the narrative simplifies or amplifies elements of the relationship to deflect scrutiny from his judgment in empowering Epstein in the first place. Until more concrete evidence is produced, the precise nature and extent of any alleged financial misconduct by Epstein toward Wexner remains a subject of debate rather than settled fact.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2271</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Courtney Wild And Her Jeffrey  Epstein Related Deposition From 2017 (Part 4)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/courtney-wild-and-her-jeffrey-epstein-related-deposition-from-2017-part-4--72604342</link><description><![CDATA[In the 2017 video deposition of Courtney E. Wild, taken as part of the civil case Epstein v. Rothstein in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Wild testified under oath about her personal background, criminal history, and relevant circumstances before the court began substantive questions. The early portion of the deposition focuses on Wild’s identity and personal history, including her marriage, family situation, and her own past convictions, including a drug trafficking conviction for which she was serving a sentence at the Gadsden Correctional Facility in Florida at the time of the deposition. Wild was sworn in and answered basic biographical questions about her life prior to moving into the heart of the civil litigation against Epstein’s representatives and others, establishing her presence and credibility as a witness in the case’s factual record<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Epstein%20v.%20Rothstein,%20No.%2050-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB%20(Fla.%2015th%20Cir.%20Ct.%202009)/1027.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1027.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72604342</guid><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72604342/courtneywilddeposition4.mp3" length="12480723" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7c16001c-9dce-47fd-be60-2f40723f98b0/7c16001c-9dce-47fd-be60-2f40723f98b0.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7c16001c-9dce-47fd-be60-2f40723f98b0/7c16001c-9dce-47fd-be60-2f40723f98b0.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7c16001c-9dce-47fd-be60-2f40723f98b0/7c16001c-9dce-47fd-be60-2f40723f98b0.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In the 2017 video deposition of Courtney E. Wild, taken as part of the civil case Epstein v. Rothstein in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Wild testified under oath about her personal background, criminal history, and relevant...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In the 2017 video deposition of Courtney E. Wild, taken as part of the civil case Epstein v. Rothstein in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Wild testified under oath about her personal background, criminal history, and relevant circumstances before the court began substantive questions. The early portion of the deposition focuses on Wild’s identity and personal history, including her marriage, family situation, and her own past convictions, including a drug trafficking conviction for which she was serving a sentence at the Gadsden Correctional Facility in Florida at the time of the deposition. Wild was sworn in and answered basic biographical questions about her life prior to moving into the heart of the civil litigation against Epstein’s representatives and others, establishing her presence and credibility as a witness in the case’s factual record<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Epstein%20v.%20Rothstein,%20No.%2050-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB%20(Fla.%2015th%20Cir.%20Ct.%202009)/1027.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1027.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>781</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Courtney Wild And Her Jeffrey  Epstein Related Deposition From 2017 (Part 3)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/courtney-wild-and-her-jeffrey-epstein-related-deposition-from-2017-part-3--72604344</link><description><![CDATA[In the 2017 video deposition of Courtney E. Wild, taken as part of the civil case Epstein v. Rothstein in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Wild testified under oath about her personal background, criminal history, and relevant circumstances before the court began substantive questions. The early portion of the deposition focuses on Wild’s identity and personal history, including her marriage, family situation, and her own past convictions, including a drug trafficking conviction for which she was serving a sentence at the Gadsden Correctional Facility in Florida at the time of the deposition. Wild was sworn in and answered basic biographical questions about her life prior to moving into the heart of the civil litigation against Epstein’s representatives and others, establishing her presence and credibility as a witness in the case’s factual record<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Epstein%20v.%20Rothstein,%20No.%2050-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB%20(Fla.%2015th%20Cir.%20Ct.%202009)/1027.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1027.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72604344</guid><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72604344/courtneywilddeposition3.mp3" length="11541986" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b50923a5-cd89-41cb-8872-6075f6b27978/b50923a5-cd89-41cb-8872-6075f6b27978.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b50923a5-cd89-41cb-8872-6075f6b27978/b50923a5-cd89-41cb-8872-6075f6b27978.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b50923a5-cd89-41cb-8872-6075f6b27978/b50923a5-cd89-41cb-8872-6075f6b27978.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In the 2017 video deposition of Courtney E. Wild, taken as part of the civil case Epstein v. Rothstein in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Wild testified under oath about her personal background, criminal history, and relevant...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In the 2017 video deposition of Courtney E. Wild, taken as part of the civil case Epstein v. Rothstein in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Wild testified under oath about her personal background, criminal history, and relevant circumstances before the court began substantive questions. The early portion of the deposition focuses on Wild’s identity and personal history, including her marriage, family situation, and her own past convictions, including a drug trafficking conviction for which she was serving a sentence at the Gadsden Correctional Facility in Florida at the time of the deposition. Wild was sworn in and answered basic biographical questions about her life prior to moving into the heart of the civil litigation against Epstein’s representatives and others, establishing her presence and credibility as a witness in the case’s factual record<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Epstein%20v.%20Rothstein,%20No.%2050-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB%20(Fla.%2015th%20Cir.%20Ct.%202009)/1027.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1027.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>722</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Courtney Wild And Her Jeffrey  Epstein Related Deposition From 2017 (Part 2)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/courtney-wild-and-her-jeffrey-epstein-related-deposition-from-2017-part-2--72604349</link><description><![CDATA[In the 2017 video deposition of Courtney E. Wild, taken as part of the civil case Epstein v. Rothstein in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Wild testified under oath about her personal background, criminal history, and relevant circumstances before the court began substantive questions. The early portion of the deposition focuses on Wild’s identity and personal history, including her marriage, family situation, and her own past convictions, including a drug trafficking conviction for which she was serving a sentence at the Gadsden Correctional Facility in Florida at the time of the deposition. Wild was sworn in and answered basic biographical questions about her life prior to moving into the heart of the civil litigation against Epstein’s representatives and others, establishing her presence and credibility as a witness in the case’s factual record<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Epstein%20v.%20Rothstein,%20No.%2050-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB%20(Fla.%2015th%20Cir.%20Ct.%202009)/1027.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1027.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72604349</guid><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72604349/courtneywilddeposition2.mp3" length="14443041" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2d69c8c4-ad0f-45ff-a13c-250ac4610767/2d69c8c4-ad0f-45ff-a13c-250ac4610767.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2d69c8c4-ad0f-45ff-a13c-250ac4610767/2d69c8c4-ad0f-45ff-a13c-250ac4610767.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2d69c8c4-ad0f-45ff-a13c-250ac4610767/2d69c8c4-ad0f-45ff-a13c-250ac4610767.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In the 2017 video deposition of Courtney E. Wild, taken as part of the civil case Epstein v. Rothstein in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Wild testified under oath about her personal background, criminal history, and relevant...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In the 2017 video deposition of Courtney E. Wild, taken as part of the civil case Epstein v. Rothstein in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Wild testified under oath about her personal background, criminal history, and relevant circumstances before the court began substantive questions. The early portion of the deposition focuses on Wild’s identity and personal history, including her marriage, family situation, and her own past convictions, including a drug trafficking conviction for which she was serving a sentence at the Gadsden Correctional Facility in Florida at the time of the deposition. Wild was sworn in and answered basic biographical questions about her life prior to moving into the heart of the civil litigation against Epstein’s representatives and others, establishing her presence and credibility as a witness in the case’s factual record<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Epstein%20v.%20Rothstein,%20No.%2050-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB%20(Fla.%2015th%20Cir.%20Ct.%202009)/1027.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1027.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>903</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Courtney Wild And Her Jeffrey  Epstein Related Deposition From 2017 (Part 1)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/courtney-wild-and-her-jeffrey-epstein-related-deposition-from-2017-part-1--72604348</link><description><![CDATA[In the 2017 video deposition of Courtney E. Wild, taken as part of the civil case Epstein v. Rothstein in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Wild testified under oath about her personal background, criminal history, and relevant circumstances before the court began substantive questions. The early portion of the deposition focuses on Wild’s identity and personal history, including her marriage, family situation, and her own past convictions, including a drug trafficking conviction for which she was serving a sentence at the Gadsden Correctional Facility in Florida at the time of the deposition. Wild was sworn in and answered basic biographical questions about her life prior to moving into the heart of the civil litigation against Epstein’s representatives and others, establishing her presence and credibility as a witness in the case’s factual record<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Epstein%20v.%20Rothstein,%20No.%2050-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB%20(Fla.%2015th%20Cir.%20Ct.%202009)/1027.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1027.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72604348</guid><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72604348/courtneywilddeposition1.mp3" length="12099126" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9b2a6b1d-e63c-4b28-821e-e9d18a2ec6f4/9b2a6b1d-e63c-4b28-821e-e9d18a2ec6f4.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9b2a6b1d-e63c-4b28-821e-e9d18a2ec6f4/9b2a6b1d-e63c-4b28-821e-e9d18a2ec6f4.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9b2a6b1d-e63c-4b28-821e-e9d18a2ec6f4/9b2a6b1d-e63c-4b28-821e-e9d18a2ec6f4.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In the 2017 video deposition of Courtney E. Wild, taken as part of the civil case Epstein v. Rothstein in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Wild testified under oath about her personal background, criminal history, and relevant...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In the 2017 video deposition of Courtney E. Wild, taken as part of the civil case Epstein v. Rothstein in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Wild testified under oath about her personal background, criminal history, and relevant circumstances before the court began substantive questions. The early portion of the deposition focuses on Wild’s identity and personal history, including her marriage, family situation, and her own past convictions, including a drug trafficking conviction for which she was serving a sentence at the Gadsden Correctional Facility in Florida at the time of the deposition. Wild was sworn in and answered basic biographical questions about her life prior to moving into the heart of the civil litigation against Epstein’s representatives and others, establishing her presence and credibility as a witness in the case’s factual record<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Epstein%20v.%20Rothstein,%20No.%2050-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB%20(Fla.%2015th%20Cir.%20Ct.%202009)/1027.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">1027.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>757</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The UK Inquiry Into Grooming Gangs:  Introduction And Executive Summary (6/19/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-uk-inquiry-into-grooming-gangs-introduction-and-executive-summary-6-19-26--72601950</link><description><![CDATA[Rupert Lowe’s inquiry says it received evidence from survivors, relatives, whistleblowers, professionals and political figures about organised child sexual exploitation in communities across the United Kingdom. The report describes a recurring pattern in which vulnerable girls were targeted with attention, gifts, alcohol and drugs before being subjected to sexual violence, intimidation and trafficking between offenders and locations. It states that the victims discussed in the evidence were predominantly white British girls and that many of the alleged perpetrators were men of Pakistani Muslim heritage. The inquiry says the abuse was allowed to continue because police forces, social services, schools, healthcare providers, licensing authorities and government bodies repeatedly failed to identify victims, share information, investigate allegations properly or intervene when clear warning signs appeared.<br /><br />The report calls for mandatory reporting of suspected child sexual exploitation, improved collection of demographic information about victims and offenders, specialist police units and a consistent national system for sharing safeguarding intelligence. It also recommends regular training for police officers, teachers, medical staff and social workers; automatic referrals when children present with injuries, pregnancies, sexually transmitted infections, self-harm or other indicators of exploitation; and long-term medical, psychological, housing and legal support for survivors. Additional recommendations include reviewing convictions imposed on children who committed offences while being exploited, stronger sentencing, deportation proceedings against convicted foreign nationals where legally applicable, and legal action against perpetrators or officials believed to have escaped accountability.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://static1.squarespace.com/static/6810978a41bbc42489eafa81/t/6a314bb1151e511944bd4421/1781615537601/The+Rape+Gang+Inquiry+Report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Rape Gang Inquiry Report.docx</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72601950</guid><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72601950/ukgrooming1.mp3" length="15069980" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b464dfd2-563e-49a5-8792-867754d44e75/b464dfd2-563e-49a5-8792-867754d44e75.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b464dfd2-563e-49a5-8792-867754d44e75/b464dfd2-563e-49a5-8792-867754d44e75.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b464dfd2-563e-49a5-8792-867754d44e75/b464dfd2-563e-49a5-8792-867754d44e75.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Rupert Lowe’s inquiry says it received evidence from survivors, relatives, whistleblowers, professionals and political figures about organised child sexual exploitation in communities across the United Kingdom. The report describes a recurring pattern...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Rupert Lowe’s inquiry says it received evidence from survivors, relatives, whistleblowers, professionals and political figures about organised child sexual exploitation in communities across the United Kingdom. The report describes a recurring pattern in which vulnerable girls were targeted with attention, gifts, alcohol and drugs before being subjected to sexual violence, intimidation and trafficking between offenders and locations. It states that the victims discussed in the evidence were predominantly white British girls and that many of the alleged perpetrators were men of Pakistani Muslim heritage. The inquiry says the abuse was allowed to continue because police forces, social services, schools, healthcare providers, licensing authorities and government bodies repeatedly failed to identify victims, share information, investigate allegations properly or intervene when clear warning signs appeared.<br /><br />The report calls for mandatory reporting of suspected child sexual exploitation, improved collection of demographic information about victims and offenders, specialist police units and a consistent national system for sharing safeguarding intelligence. It also recommends regular training for police officers, teachers, medical staff and social workers; automatic referrals when children present with injuries, pregnancies, sexually transmitted infections, self-harm or other indicators of exploitation; and long-term medical, psychological, housing and legal support for survivors. Additional recommendations include reviewing convictions imposed on children who committed offences while being exploited, stronger sentencing, deportation proceedings against convicted foreign nationals where legally applicable, and legal action against perpetrators or officials believed to have escaped accountability.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://static1.squarespace.com/static/6810978a41bbc42489eafa81/t/6a314bb1151e511944bd4421/1781615537601/The+Rape+Gang+Inquiry+Report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Rape Gang Inquiry Report.docx</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>942</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>War, Distraction and the Jeffrey Epstein Scandal (6/19/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/war-distraction-and-the-jeffrey-epstein-scandal-6-19-26--72601946</link><description><![CDATA[David Rothkopf argues that Donald Trump’s military confrontations with Venezuela and Iran were not primarily driven by national-security concerns, but by a political need to divert attention from the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. The opinion column portrays the operations as “wars of distraction,” claiming the administration repeatedly shifted its stated justifications because neither country presented the imminent threat the White House alleged. Rothkopf contends that the Venezuela intervention amounted to an unlawful resource-driven shakedown, while the Iran war produced heavy casualties, economic disruption and weakened alliances without eliminating Tehran’s nuclear, missile or proxy capabilities. In his telling, Trump began looking for an exit once the Iran conflict became a political liability rather than a useful distraction.<br /><br /><br />The central argument is that Trump’s foreign-policy decisions cannot be separated from his administration’s handling of Epstein-related disclosures. Rothkopf accuses the White House and Justice Department of trying to suppress damaging information, points to the government’s dealings with Ghislaine Maxwell and Todd Blanche, and argues that Trump’s resistance to transparency has only intensified public suspicion. The column suggests that military deployments in American cities, the Venezuela operation and the Iran war formed a succession of “Epstein Wars,” with each crisis serving as an attempted escape from questions about Trump’s past relationship with Epstein. It concludes by warning that additional confrontations involving Cuba, Greenland or Panama could follow if Trump again seeks a dramatic foreign-policy spectacle to change the political subject.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.thedailybeast.com/donald-trumps-forever-wars-all-come-back-to-jeffrey-epstein/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Donald Trump’s ‘Forever Wars’ All Come Back to Jeffrey Epstein</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72601946</guid><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 18:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72601946/trumpiranvenezueladistractions.mp3" length="19517484" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f9e0d611-133f-4414-a147-845ec03e8f0a/f9e0d611-133f-4414-a147-845ec03e8f0a.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f9e0d611-133f-4414-a147-845ec03e8f0a/f9e0d611-133f-4414-a147-845ec03e8f0a.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f9e0d611-133f-4414-a147-845ec03e8f0a/f9e0d611-133f-4414-a147-845ec03e8f0a.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>David Rothkopf argues that Donald Trump’s military confrontations with Venezuela and Iran were not primarily driven by national-security concerns, but by a political need to divert attention from the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. The opinion column...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[David Rothkopf argues that Donald Trump’s military confrontations with Venezuela and Iran were not primarily driven by national-security concerns, but by a political need to divert attention from the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. The opinion column portrays the operations as “wars of distraction,” claiming the administration repeatedly shifted its stated justifications because neither country presented the imminent threat the White House alleged. Rothkopf contends that the Venezuela intervention amounted to an unlawful resource-driven shakedown, while the Iran war produced heavy casualties, economic disruption and weakened alliances without eliminating Tehran’s nuclear, missile or proxy capabilities. In his telling, Trump began looking for an exit once the Iran conflict became a political liability rather than a useful distraction.<br /><br /><br />The central argument is that Trump’s foreign-policy decisions cannot be separated from his administration’s handling of Epstein-related disclosures. Rothkopf accuses the White House and Justice Department of trying to suppress damaging information, points to the government’s dealings with Ghislaine Maxwell and Todd Blanche, and argues that Trump’s resistance to transparency has only intensified public suspicion. The column suggests that military deployments in American cities, the Venezuela operation and the Iran war formed a succession of “Epstein Wars,” with each crisis serving as an attempted escape from questions about Trump’s past relationship with Epstein. It concludes by warning that additional confrontations involving Cuba, Greenland or Panama could follow if Trump again seeks a dramatic foreign-policy spectacle to change the political subject.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.thedailybeast.com/donald-trumps-forever-wars-all-come-back-to-jeffrey-epstein/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Donald Trump’s ‘Forever Wars’ All Come Back to Jeffrey Epstein</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1220</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>If Epstein Attempted To Take His Own Life Three Times, Why Was It Missing From the OIG Report? (Part 2) (6/19/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/if-epstein-attempted-to-take-his-own-life-three-times-why-was-it-missing-from-the-oig-report-part-2-6-19-26--72600812</link><description><![CDATA[The New York Times’ new claim that Jeffrey Epstein attempted suicide at least three times depends heavily on Nicholas Tartaglione, Epstein’s former cellmate and a convicted quadruple murderer with an obvious personal interest in shaping the story. Epstein initially accused Tartaglione of attacking him during the disputed July 23, 2019 incident, so Tartaglione benefits enormously from portraying Epstein as repeatedly suicidal and himself as the man who tried to save him. His account turns him from a possible aggressor into a rescuer who found nooses, warned guards, performed chest compressions, and preserved a purported suicide note. Yet these extraordinary allegations do not appear clearly in the major official investigations, psychological records, medical reports, or the Justice Department inspector general’s reconstruction. If Epstein had repeatedly attempted hanging, lost consciousness, and required resuscitation, there should be identifiable officers, medical documentation, incident reports, confiscated materials, surveillance evidence, or contemporaneous witnesses. Without that corroboration, Tartaglione’s story remains a deeply self-serving allegation rather than an established fact.<br /><br />Questioning Tartaglione does not require rejecting the official suicide ruling or embracing a murder theory. It simply means applying ordinary journalistic standards to an unreliable and interested source. The official record may be incomplete, and prison officials may have concealed or mishandled important information, but those possibilities do not automatically make Tartaglione truthful. His claims should be tested individually against records, witnesses, physical evidence, and the timeline, particularly because they emerged publicly years after the events and conveniently support both his defense and the government’s broader narrative. By presenting his account as a bombshell without resolving these contradictions, the Times risks laundering one prisoner’s recollections into historical fact. In a case already defined by falsified logs, missing evidence, negligent guards, institutional secrecy, and contradictory official statements, certainty should come from corroboration—not from the belated word of a man with every reason to rewrite his role in the story.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72600812</guid><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 16:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72600812/myresponsetimes2.mp3" length="15266839" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5d69307e-b499-403b-b5d2-1aa6c37070b0/5d69307e-b499-403b-b5d2-1aa6c37070b0.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5d69307e-b499-403b-b5d2-1aa6c37070b0/5d69307e-b499-403b-b5d2-1aa6c37070b0.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5d69307e-b499-403b-b5d2-1aa6c37070b0/5d69307e-b499-403b-b5d2-1aa6c37070b0.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The New York Times’ new claim that Jeffrey Epstein attempted suicide at least three times depends heavily on Nicholas Tartaglione, Epstein’s former cellmate and a convicted quadruple murderer with an obvious personal interest in shaping the story....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The New York Times’ new claim that Jeffrey Epstein attempted suicide at least three times depends heavily on Nicholas Tartaglione, Epstein’s former cellmate and a convicted quadruple murderer with an obvious personal interest in shaping the story. Epstein initially accused Tartaglione of attacking him during the disputed July 23, 2019 incident, so Tartaglione benefits enormously from portraying Epstein as repeatedly suicidal and himself as the man who tried to save him. His account turns him from a possible aggressor into a rescuer who found nooses, warned guards, performed chest compressions, and preserved a purported suicide note. Yet these extraordinary allegations do not appear clearly in the major official investigations, psychological records, medical reports, or the Justice Department inspector general’s reconstruction. If Epstein had repeatedly attempted hanging, lost consciousness, and required resuscitation, there should be identifiable officers, medical documentation, incident reports, confiscated materials, surveillance evidence, or contemporaneous witnesses. Without that corroboration, Tartaglione’s story remains a deeply self-serving allegation rather than an established fact.<br /><br />Questioning Tartaglione does not require rejecting the official suicide ruling or embracing a murder theory. It simply means applying ordinary journalistic standards to an unreliable and interested source. The official record may be incomplete, and prison officials may have concealed or mishandled important information, but those possibilities do not automatically make Tartaglione truthful. His claims should be tested individually against records, witnesses, physical evidence, and the timeline, particularly because they emerged publicly years after the events and conveniently support both his defense and the government’s broader narrative. By presenting his account as a bombshell without resolving these contradictions, the Times risks laundering one prisoner’s recollections into historical fact. In a case already defined by falsified logs, missing evidence, negligent guards, institutional secrecy, and contradictory official statements, certainty should come from corroboration—not from the belated word of a man with every reason to rewrite his role in the story.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>955</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>If Epstein Attempted To Take His Own Life Three Times, Why Was It Missing From the OIG Report? (Part 1) (6/19/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/if-epstein-attempted-to-take-his-own-life-three-times-why-was-it-missing-from-the-oig-report-part-1-6-19-26--72600813</link><description><![CDATA[The New York Times’ new claim that Jeffrey Epstein attempted suicide at least three times depends heavily on Nicholas Tartaglione, Epstein’s former cellmate and a convicted quadruple murderer with an obvious personal interest in shaping the story. Epstein initially accused Tartaglione of attacking him during the disputed July 23, 2019 incident, so Tartaglione benefits enormously from portraying Epstein as repeatedly suicidal and himself as the man who tried to save him. His account turns him from a possible aggressor into a rescuer who found nooses, warned guards, performed chest compressions, and preserved a purported suicide note. Yet these extraordinary allegations do not appear clearly in the major official investigations, psychological records, medical reports, or the Justice Department inspector general’s reconstruction. If Epstein had repeatedly attempted hanging, lost consciousness, and required resuscitation, there should be identifiable officers, medical documentation, incident reports, confiscated materials, surveillance evidence, or contemporaneous witnesses. Without that corroboration, Tartaglione’s story remains a deeply self-serving allegation rather than an established fact.<br /><br />Questioning Tartaglione does not require rejecting the official suicide ruling or embracing a murder theory. It simply means applying ordinary journalistic standards to an unreliable and interested source. The official record may be incomplete, and prison officials may have concealed or mishandled important information, but those possibilities do not automatically make Tartaglione truthful. His claims should be tested individually against records, witnesses, physical evidence, and the timeline, particularly because they emerged publicly years after the events and conveniently support both his defense and the government’s broader narrative. By presenting his account as a bombshell without resolving these contradictions, the Times risks laundering one prisoner’s recollections into historical fact. In a case already defined by falsified logs, missing evidence, negligent guards, institutional secrecy, and contradictory official statements, certainty should come from corroboration—not from the belated word of a man with every reason to rewrite his role in the story.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72600813</guid><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72600813/myresponsetothetimes1.mp3" length="13020726" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/04d1ffb9-61d2-4123-9a81-60c40df11b39/04d1ffb9-61d2-4123-9a81-60c40df11b39.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/04d1ffb9-61d2-4123-9a81-60c40df11b39/04d1ffb9-61d2-4123-9a81-60c40df11b39.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/04d1ffb9-61d2-4123-9a81-60c40df11b39/04d1ffb9-61d2-4123-9a81-60c40df11b39.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The New York Times’ new claim that Jeffrey Epstein attempted suicide at least three times depends heavily on Nicholas Tartaglione, Epstein’s former cellmate and a convicted quadruple murderer with an obvious personal interest in shaping the story....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The New York Times’ new claim that Jeffrey Epstein attempted suicide at least three times depends heavily on Nicholas Tartaglione, Epstein’s former cellmate and a convicted quadruple murderer with an obvious personal interest in shaping the story. Epstein initially accused Tartaglione of attacking him during the disputed July 23, 2019 incident, so Tartaglione benefits enormously from portraying Epstein as repeatedly suicidal and himself as the man who tried to save him. His account turns him from a possible aggressor into a rescuer who found nooses, warned guards, performed chest compressions, and preserved a purported suicide note. Yet these extraordinary allegations do not appear clearly in the major official investigations, psychological records, medical reports, or the Justice Department inspector general’s reconstruction. If Epstein had repeatedly attempted hanging, lost consciousness, and required resuscitation, there should be identifiable officers, medical documentation, incident reports, confiscated materials, surveillance evidence, or contemporaneous witnesses. Without that corroboration, Tartaglione’s story remains a deeply self-serving allegation rather than an established fact.<br /><br />Questioning Tartaglione does not require rejecting the official suicide ruling or embracing a murder theory. It simply means applying ordinary journalistic standards to an unreliable and interested source. The official record may be incomplete, and prison officials may have concealed or mishandled important information, but those possibilities do not automatically make Tartaglione truthful. His claims should be tested individually against records, witnesses, physical evidence, and the timeline, particularly because they emerged publicly years after the events and conveniently support both his defense and the government’s broader narrative. By presenting his account as a bombshell without resolving these contradictions, the Times risks laundering one prisoner’s recollections into historical fact. In a case already defined by falsified logs, missing evidence, negligent guards, institutional secrecy, and contradictory official statements, certainty should come from corroboration—not from the belated word of a man with every reason to rewrite his role in the story.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>814</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The Deposition Of Epstein's Chief Pilot Larry Visoski (Part 12-15) (6/19/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-deposition-of-epstein-s-chief-pilot-larry-visoski-part-12-15-6-19-26--72583365</link><description><![CDATA[In his October 2009 deposition, taken during the Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley Edwards defamation lawsuit, longtime Epstein pilot Larry Visoski described his decades of employment under Epstein and the routine nature of his work. Questioned by victims’ attorney Bradley Edwards, Visoski confirmed that he had flown Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and numerous guests—some of them prominent figures—across Epstein’s properties in New York, Florida, New Mexico, and the Virgin Islands. Represented by Critton &amp; Reinhardt, Visoski repeatedly emphasized that his duties were strictly professional: piloting aircraft, maintaining schedules, and ensuring safe transport. When pressed about the ages of female passengers, he claimed he never knowingly flew minors and denied witnessing any sexual activity or misconduct aboard Epstein’s planes.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72583365</guid><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72583365/megavisoskideposition12n13n14n15.mp3" length="52690486" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6a45731a-c162-45c2-b085-9231b256ef9e/6a45731a-c162-45c2-b085-9231b256ef9e.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6a45731a-c162-45c2-b085-9231b256ef9e/6a45731a-c162-45c2-b085-9231b256ef9e.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6a45731a-c162-45c2-b085-9231b256ef9e/6a45731a-c162-45c2-b085-9231b256ef9e.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In his October 2009 deposition, taken during the Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley Edwards defamation lawsuit, longtime Epstein pilot Larry Visoski described his decades of employment under Epstein and the routine nature of his work. Questioned by victims’...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In his October 2009 deposition, taken during the Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley Edwards defamation lawsuit, longtime Epstein pilot Larry Visoski described his decades of employment under Epstein and the routine nature of his work. Questioned by victims’ attorney Bradley Edwards, Visoski confirmed that he had flown Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and numerous guests—some of them prominent figures—across Epstein’s properties in New York, Florida, New Mexico, and the Virgin Islands. Represented by Critton &amp; Reinhardt, Visoski repeatedly emphasized that his duties were strictly professional: piloting aircraft, maintaining schedules, and ensuring safe transport. When pressed about the ages of female passengers, he claimed he never knowingly flew minors and denied witnessing any sexual activity or misconduct aboard Epstein’s planes.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3294</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The Deposition Of Epstein's Chief Pilot Larry Visoski (Part 8-11) (6/19/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-deposition-of-epstein-s-chief-pilot-larry-visoski-part-8-11-6-19-26--72583368</link><description><![CDATA[In his October 2009 deposition, taken during the Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley Edwards defamation lawsuit, longtime Epstein pilot Larry Visoski described his decades of employment under Epstein and the routine nature of his work. Questioned by victims’ attorney Bradley Edwards, Visoski confirmed that he had flown Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and numerous guests—some of them prominent figures—across Epstein’s properties in New York, Florida, New Mexico, and the Virgin Islands. Represented by Critton &amp; Reinhardt, Visoski repeatedly emphasized that his duties were strictly professional: piloting aircraft, maintaining schedules, and ensuring safe transport. When pressed about the ages of female passengers, he claimed he never knowingly flew minors and denied witnessing any sexual activity or misconduct aboard Epstein’s planes.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72583368</guid><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72583368/megavisoski8n9n10n11.mp3" length="52082355" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0d0d90c3-026c-4b6c-a036-73ac6a398861/0d0d90c3-026c-4b6c-a036-73ac6a398861.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0d0d90c3-026c-4b6c-a036-73ac6a398861/0d0d90c3-026c-4b6c-a036-73ac6a398861.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0d0d90c3-026c-4b6c-a036-73ac6a398861/0d0d90c3-026c-4b6c-a036-73ac6a398861.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In his October 2009 deposition, taken during the Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley Edwards defamation lawsuit, longtime Epstein pilot Larry Visoski described his decades of employment under Epstein and the routine nature of his work. Questioned by victims’...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In his October 2009 deposition, taken during the Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley Edwards defamation lawsuit, longtime Epstein pilot Larry Visoski described his decades of employment under Epstein and the routine nature of his work. Questioned by victims’ attorney Bradley Edwards, Visoski confirmed that he had flown Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and numerous guests—some of them prominent figures—across Epstein’s properties in New York, Florida, New Mexico, and the Virgin Islands. Represented by Critton &amp; Reinhardt, Visoski repeatedly emphasized that his duties were strictly professional: piloting aircraft, maintaining schedules, and ensuring safe transport. When pressed about the ages of female passengers, he claimed he never knowingly flew minors and denied witnessing any sexual activity or misconduct aboard Epstein’s planes.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3256</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The Deposition Of Epstein's Chief Pilot Larry Visoski (Part 4-7) (6/19/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-deposition-of-epstein-s-chief-pilot-larry-visoski-part-4-7-6-19-26--72583367</link><description><![CDATA[In his October 2009 deposition, taken during the Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley Edwards defamation lawsuit, longtime Epstein pilot Larry Visoski described his decades of employment under Epstein and the routine nature of his work. Questioned by victims’ attorney Bradley Edwards, Visoski confirmed that he had flown Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and numerous guests—some of them prominent figures—across Epstein’s properties in New York, Florida, New Mexico, and the Virgin Islands. Represented by Critton &amp; Reinhardt, Visoski repeatedly emphasized that his duties were strictly professional: piloting aircraft, maintaining schedules, and ensuring safe transport. When pressed about the ages of female passengers, he claimed he never knowingly flew minors and denied witnessing any sexual activity or misconduct aboard Epstein’s planes.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72583367</guid><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 08:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72583367/megavisoski4n5n6n7.mp3" length="46913036" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/da4288a8-1e65-4aee-873c-3e0cce8bdc5b/da4288a8-1e65-4aee-873c-3e0cce8bdc5b.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/da4288a8-1e65-4aee-873c-3e0cce8bdc5b/da4288a8-1e65-4aee-873c-3e0cce8bdc5b.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/da4288a8-1e65-4aee-873c-3e0cce8bdc5b/da4288a8-1e65-4aee-873c-3e0cce8bdc5b.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In his October 2009 deposition, taken during the Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley Edwards defamation lawsuit, longtime Epstein pilot Larry Visoski described his decades of employment under Epstein and the routine nature of his work. Questioned by victims’...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In his October 2009 deposition, taken during the Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley Edwards defamation lawsuit, longtime Epstein pilot Larry Visoski described his decades of employment under Epstein and the routine nature of his work. Questioned by victims’ attorney Bradley Edwards, Visoski confirmed that he had flown Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and numerous guests—some of them prominent figures—across Epstein’s properties in New York, Florida, New Mexico, and the Virgin Islands. Represented by Critton &amp; Reinhardt, Visoski repeatedly emphasized that his duties were strictly professional: piloting aircraft, maintaining schedules, and ensuring safe transport. When pressed about the ages of female passengers, he claimed he never knowingly flew minors and denied witnessing any sexual activity or misconduct aboard Epstein’s planes.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2933</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The Deposition Of Epstein's Chief Pilot Larry Visoski (Part 1-3) (6/18/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-deposition-of-epstein-s-chief-pilot-larry-visoski-part-1-3-6-18-26--72583366</link><description><![CDATA[In his October 2009 deposition, taken during the Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley Edwards defamation lawsuit, longtime Epstein pilot Larry Visoski described his decades of employment under Epstein and the routine nature of his work. Questioned by victims’ attorney Bradley Edwards, Visoski confirmed that he had flown Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and numerous guests—some of them prominent figures—across Epstein’s properties in New York, Florida, New Mexico, and the Virgin Islands. Represented by Critton &amp; Reinhardt, Visoski repeatedly emphasized that his duties were strictly professional: piloting aircraft, maintaining schedules, and ensuring safe transport. When pressed about the ages of female passengers, he claimed he never knowingly flew minors and denied witnessing any sexual activity or misconduct aboard Epstein’s planes.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72583366</guid><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72583366/megavisoskideposition1n2n3.mp3" length="43839782" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1158dbe0-177d-4cc4-987e-473a9f9de8d4/1158dbe0-177d-4cc4-987e-473a9f9de8d4.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1158dbe0-177d-4cc4-987e-473a9f9de8d4/1158dbe0-177d-4cc4-987e-473a9f9de8d4.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1158dbe0-177d-4cc4-987e-473a9f9de8d4/1158dbe0-177d-4cc4-987e-473a9f9de8d4.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In his October 2009 deposition, taken during the Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley Edwards defamation lawsuit, longtime Epstein pilot Larry Visoski described his decades of employment under Epstein and the routine nature of his work. Questioned by victims’...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In his October 2009 deposition, taken during the Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley Edwards defamation lawsuit, longtime Epstein pilot Larry Visoski described his decades of employment under Epstein and the routine nature of his work. Questioned by victims’ attorney Bradley Edwards, Visoski confirmed that he had flown Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and numerous guests—some of them prominent figures—across Epstein’s properties in New York, Florida, New Mexico, and the Virgin Islands. Represented by Critton &amp; Reinhardt, Visoski repeatedly emphasized that his duties were strictly professional: piloting aircraft, maintaining schedules, and ensuring safe transport. When pressed about the ages of female passengers, he claimed he never knowingly flew minors and denied witnessing any sexual activity or misconduct aboard Epstein’s planes.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2740</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>No Title, No Honor, No Dignity:   Andrew Is Stripped Of All Remaining Titles And Honors (Part 3)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/no-title-no-honor-no-dignity-andrew-is-stripped-of-all-remaining-titles-and-honors-part-3--72583372</link><description><![CDATA[Prince Andrew has finally been stripped of every last royal title and honor he once clung to like a lifeline. King Charles III, evidently tired of cleaning up his brother’s messes, used his royal prerogative to remove Andrew’s styles, ranks, and knighthoods—everything from “His Royal Highness” to the Duke of York and beyond. The disgraced royal, now simply Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, has also been ordered to vacate the lavish Royal Lodge, marking a total fall from grace for the man who once strutted around as the Queen’s favorite son. The move is being described as unprecedented, but in truth, it’s been a long time coming. After years of scandal, arrogance, and shameless denial over his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein, the crown finally decided that Andrew’s dead weight was too heavy to carry any longer.<br /><br />For Prince Andrew, this wasn’t just a fall from grace—it was a full-scale implosion of everything he thought made him untouchable. Even stripped of his titles, he’s still clinging to denial like it’s his last shred of nobility, pretending the world just “doesn’t understand.” The man who once swaggered around royal circles with smug entitlement now stands exposed as the cautionary tale of what happens when arrogance meets consequence. His downfall isn’t tragic—it’s poetic justice. He built his own downfall one disastrous decision at a time, from his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein to his laughable denials and public meltdowns. The final insult isn’t that he lost his titles—it’s that the titles ever disguised what he really was: a spoiled, self-serving opportunist who mistook birthright for character.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15245239/Andrew-bars-Virginia-Giuffres-brother-pressure-grows-prosecution-shamed-ex-prince-friends-come-forward-droves.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">'Boorish and entitled' Andrew is now an 'ordinary member of the public': King stripped his brother of his prince title and ordered him to leave Royal Lodge after being 'consistently embarrassed' | Daily Mail Online</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72583372</guid><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72583372/andystripped3_1.mp3" length="13090107" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8af67f24-a888-4fa0-83fd-61d8a06697cd/8af67f24-a888-4fa0-83fd-61d8a06697cd.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8af67f24-a888-4fa0-83fd-61d8a06697cd/8af67f24-a888-4fa0-83fd-61d8a06697cd.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8af67f24-a888-4fa0-83fd-61d8a06697cd/8af67f24-a888-4fa0-83fd-61d8a06697cd.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Prince Andrew has finally been stripped of every last royal title and honor he once clung to like a lifeline. King Charles III, evidently tired of cleaning up his brother’s messes, used his royal prerogative to remove Andrew’s styles, ranks, and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Prince Andrew has finally been stripped of every last royal title and honor he once clung to like a lifeline. King Charles III, evidently tired of cleaning up his brother’s messes, used his royal prerogative to remove Andrew’s styles, ranks, and knighthoods—everything from “His Royal Highness” to the Duke of York and beyond. The disgraced royal, now simply Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, has also been ordered to vacate the lavish Royal Lodge, marking a total fall from grace for the man who once strutted around as the Queen’s favorite son. The move is being described as unprecedented, but in truth, it’s been a long time coming. After years of scandal, arrogance, and shameless denial over his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein, the crown finally decided that Andrew’s dead weight was too heavy to carry any longer.<br /><br />For Prince Andrew, this wasn’t just a fall from grace—it was a full-scale implosion of everything he thought made him untouchable. Even stripped of his titles, he’s still clinging to denial like it’s his last shred of nobility, pretending the world just “doesn’t understand.” The man who once swaggered around royal circles with smug entitlement now stands exposed as the cautionary tale of what happens when arrogance meets consequence. His downfall isn’t tragic—it’s poetic justice. He built his own downfall one disastrous decision at a time, from his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein to his laughable denials and public meltdowns. The final insult isn’t that he lost his titles—it’s that the titles ever disguised what he really was: a spoiled, self-serving opportunist who mistook birthright for character.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15245239/Andrew-bars-Virginia-Giuffres-brother-pressure-grows-prosecution-shamed-ex-prince-friends-come-forward-droves.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">'Boorish and entitled' Andrew is now an 'ordinary member of the public': King stripped his brother of his prince title and ordered him to leave Royal Lodge after being 'consistently embarrassed' | Daily Mail Online</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>819</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>No Title, No Honor, No Dignity:   Andrew Is Stripped Of All Remaining Titles And Honors (Part 2)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/no-title-no-honor-no-dignity-andrew-is-stripped-of-all-remaining-titles-and-honors-part-2--72583373</link><description><![CDATA[Prince Andrew has finally been stripped of every last royal title and honor he once clung to like a lifeline. King Charles III, evidently tired of cleaning up his brother’s messes, used his royal prerogative to remove Andrew’s styles, ranks, and knighthoods—everything from “His Royal Highness” to the Duke of York and beyond. The disgraced royal, now simply Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, has also been ordered to vacate the lavish Royal Lodge, marking a total fall from grace for the man who once strutted around as the Queen’s favorite son. The move is being described as unprecedented, but in truth, it’s been a long time coming. After years of scandal, arrogance, and shameless denial over his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein, the crown finally decided that Andrew’s dead weight was too heavy to carry any longer.<br /><br />For Prince Andrew, this wasn’t just a fall from grace—it was a full-scale implosion of everything he thought made him untouchable. Even stripped of his titles, he’s still clinging to denial like it’s his last shred of nobility, pretending the world just “doesn’t understand.” The man who once swaggered around royal circles with smug entitlement now stands exposed as the cautionary tale of what happens when arrogance meets consequence. His downfall isn’t tragic—it’s poetic justice. He built his own downfall one disastrous decision at a time, from his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein to his laughable denials and public meltdowns. The final insult isn’t that he lost his titles—it’s that the titles ever disguised what he really was: a spoiled, self-serving opportunist who mistook birthright for character.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15245239/Andrew-bars-Virginia-Giuffres-brother-pressure-grows-prosecution-shamed-ex-prince-friends-come-forward-droves.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">'Boorish and entitled' Andrew is now an 'ordinary member of the public': King stripped his brother of his prince title and ordered him to leave Royal Lodge after being 'consistently embarrassed' | Daily Mail Online</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72583373</guid><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72583373/andystripped2_1.mp3" length="15937663" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5a7dd68e-3d3b-4155-bc74-69b26840a438/5a7dd68e-3d3b-4155-bc74-69b26840a438.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5a7dd68e-3d3b-4155-bc74-69b26840a438/5a7dd68e-3d3b-4155-bc74-69b26840a438.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5a7dd68e-3d3b-4155-bc74-69b26840a438/5a7dd68e-3d3b-4155-bc74-69b26840a438.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Prince Andrew has finally been stripped of every last royal title and honor he once clung to like a lifeline. King Charles III, evidently tired of cleaning up his brother’s messes, used his royal prerogative to remove Andrew’s styles, ranks, and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Prince Andrew has finally been stripped of every last royal title and honor he once clung to like a lifeline. King Charles III, evidently tired of cleaning up his brother’s messes, used his royal prerogative to remove Andrew’s styles, ranks, and knighthoods—everything from “His Royal Highness” to the Duke of York and beyond. The disgraced royal, now simply Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, has also been ordered to vacate the lavish Royal Lodge, marking a total fall from grace for the man who once strutted around as the Queen’s favorite son. The move is being described as unprecedented, but in truth, it’s been a long time coming. After years of scandal, arrogance, and shameless denial over his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein, the crown finally decided that Andrew’s dead weight was too heavy to carry any longer.<br /><br />For Prince Andrew, this wasn’t just a fall from grace—it was a full-scale implosion of everything he thought made him untouchable. Even stripped of his titles, he’s still clinging to denial like it’s his last shred of nobility, pretending the world just “doesn’t understand.” The man who once swaggered around royal circles with smug entitlement now stands exposed as the cautionary tale of what happens when arrogance meets consequence. His downfall isn’t tragic—it’s poetic justice. He built his own downfall one disastrous decision at a time, from his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein to his laughable denials and public meltdowns. The final insult isn’t that he lost his titles—it’s that the titles ever disguised what he really was: a spoiled, self-serving opportunist who mistook birthright for character.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15245239/Andrew-bars-Virginia-Giuffres-brother-pressure-grows-prosecution-shamed-ex-prince-friends-come-forward-droves.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">'Boorish and entitled' Andrew is now an 'ordinary member of the public': King stripped his brother of his prince title and ordered him to leave Royal Lodge after being 'consistently embarrassed' | Daily Mail Online</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>997</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>No Title, No Honor, No Dignity:   Andrew Is Stripped Of All Remaining Titles And Honors (Part 1)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/no-title-no-honor-no-dignity-andrew-is-stripped-of-all-remaining-titles-and-honors-part-1--72583374</link><description><![CDATA[Prince Andrew has finally been stripped of every last royal title and honor he once clung to like a lifeline. King Charles III, evidently tired of cleaning up his brother’s messes, used his royal prerogative to remove Andrew’s styles, ranks, and knighthoods—everything from “His Royal Highness” to the Duke of York and beyond. The disgraced royal, now simply Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, has also been ordered to vacate the lavish Royal Lodge, marking a total fall from grace for the man who once strutted around as the Queen’s favorite son. The move is being described as unprecedented, but in truth, it’s been a long time coming. After years of scandal, arrogance, and shameless denial over his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein, the crown finally decided that Andrew’s dead weight was too heavy to carry any longer.<br /><br />For Prince Andrew, this wasn’t just a fall from grace—it was a full-scale implosion of everything he thought made him untouchable. Even stripped of his titles, he’s still clinging to denial like it’s his last shred of nobility, pretending the world just “doesn’t understand.” The man who once swaggered around royal circles with smug entitlement now stands exposed as the cautionary tale of what happens when arrogance meets consequence. His downfall isn’t tragic—it’s poetic justice. He built his own downfall one disastrous decision at a time, from his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein to his laughable denials and public meltdowns. The final insult isn’t that he lost his titles—it’s that the titles ever disguised what he really was: a spoiled, self-serving opportunist who mistook birthright for character.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15245239/Andrew-bars-Virginia-Giuffres-brother-pressure-grows-prosecution-shamed-ex-prince-friends-come-forward-droves.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">'Boorish and entitled' Andrew is now an 'ordinary member of the public': King stripped his brother of his prince title and ordered him to leave Royal Lodge after being 'consistently embarrassed' | Daily Mail Online</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72583374</guid><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 00:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72583374/andystripped1_1.mp3" length="16706708" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b333b638-e50e-4116-9958-96cecb288fb2/b333b638-e50e-4116-9958-96cecb288fb2.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b333b638-e50e-4116-9958-96cecb288fb2/b333b638-e50e-4116-9958-96cecb288fb2.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b333b638-e50e-4116-9958-96cecb288fb2/b333b638-e50e-4116-9958-96cecb288fb2.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Prince Andrew has finally been stripped of every last royal title and honor he once clung to like a lifeline. King Charles III, evidently tired of cleaning up his brother’s messes, used his royal prerogative to remove Andrew’s styles, ranks, and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Prince Andrew has finally been stripped of every last royal title and honor he once clung to like a lifeline. King Charles III, evidently tired of cleaning up his brother’s messes, used his royal prerogative to remove Andrew’s styles, ranks, and knighthoods—everything from “His Royal Highness” to the Duke of York and beyond. The disgraced royal, now simply Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, has also been ordered to vacate the lavish Royal Lodge, marking a total fall from grace for the man who once strutted around as the Queen’s favorite son. The move is being described as unprecedented, but in truth, it’s been a long time coming. After years of scandal, arrogance, and shameless denial over his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein, the crown finally decided that Andrew’s dead weight was too heavy to carry any longer.<br /><br />For Prince Andrew, this wasn’t just a fall from grace—it was a full-scale implosion of everything he thought made him untouchable. Even stripped of his titles, he’s still clinging to denial like it’s his last shred of nobility, pretending the world just “doesn’t understand.” The man who once swaggered around royal circles with smug entitlement now stands exposed as the cautionary tale of what happens when arrogance meets consequence. His downfall isn’t tragic—it’s poetic justice. He built his own downfall one disastrous decision at a time, from his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein to his laughable denials and public meltdowns. The final insult isn’t that he lost his titles—it’s that the titles ever disguised what he really was: a spoiled, self-serving opportunist who mistook birthright for character.<br /><br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15245239/Andrew-bars-Virginia-Giuffres-brother-pressure-grows-prosecution-shamed-ex-prince-friends-come-forward-droves.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">'Boorish and entitled' Andrew is now an 'ordinary member of the public': King stripped his brother of his prince title and ordered him to leave Royal Lodge after being 'consistently embarrassed' | Daily Mail Online</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1045</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Long Battle To Remove Andrew From Royal Lodge</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-long-battle-to-remove-andrew-from-royal-lodge--72583383</link><description><![CDATA[The long-running battle to remove Prince Andrew from Royal Lodge has been less about real estate and more about status, optics, and consequence. Royal Lodge, a sprawling property in Windsor Great Park, became a symbol of Andrew’s continued proximity to royal privilege even after he stepped back from public duties following the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. As public pressure mounted and his formal roles were stripped away, questions intensified over why he continued to occupy one of the most prestigious royal residences. Reports indicated that King Charles sought to streamline royal finances and reduce the footprint of working royals, which in practice meant reassessing Andrew’s position at Royal Lodge. The property carries substantial upkeep costs, and critics argued that a non-working royal facing serious reputational damage should not retain such a high-profile residence funded, directly or indirectly, through royal resources.<br /><br /><br />The dispute reportedly stretched over years, marked by negotiations, financial maneuvering, and quiet but persistent pressure to relocate Andrew to smaller accommodations, such as Frogmore Cottage. Andrew resisted, citing the long-term lease he holds on Royal Lodge and asserting that he had privately funded renovations and maintenance. The standoff became a proxy war over accountability: whether symbolic consequences would match the gravity of the scandal that engulfed him. While Andrew maintained his right to remain under the lease terms, the broader monarchy faced reputational strain so long as he continued residing there. The struggle over Royal Lodge ultimately reflected the tension between legal entitlement and public legitimacy, underscoring how deeply the Epstein fallout reshaped Andrew’s standing within both the Royal Family and public life.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72583383</guid><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72583383/andyrefusestoleeaveroyallodge.mp3" length="10298140" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b48b43a5-3f28-44e3-a966-3f59d2bc1e26/b48b43a5-3f28-44e3-a966-3f59d2bc1e26.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b48b43a5-3f28-44e3-a966-3f59d2bc1e26/b48b43a5-3f28-44e3-a966-3f59d2bc1e26.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b48b43a5-3f28-44e3-a966-3f59d2bc1e26/b48b43a5-3f28-44e3-a966-3f59d2bc1e26.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The long-running battle to remove Prince Andrew from Royal Lodge has been less about real estate and more about status, optics, and consequence. Royal Lodge, a sprawling property in Windsor Great Park, became a symbol of Andrew’s continued proximity...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The long-running battle to remove Prince Andrew from Royal Lodge has been less about real estate and more about status, optics, and consequence. Royal Lodge, a sprawling property in Windsor Great Park, became a symbol of Andrew’s continued proximity to royal privilege even after he stepped back from public duties following the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. As public pressure mounted and his formal roles were stripped away, questions intensified over why he continued to occupy one of the most prestigious royal residences. Reports indicated that King Charles sought to streamline royal finances and reduce the footprint of working royals, which in practice meant reassessing Andrew’s position at Royal Lodge. The property carries substantial upkeep costs, and critics argued that a non-working royal facing serious reputational damage should not retain such a high-profile residence funded, directly or indirectly, through royal resources.<br /><br /><br />The dispute reportedly stretched over years, marked by negotiations, financial maneuvering, and quiet but persistent pressure to relocate Andrew to smaller accommodations, such as Frogmore Cottage. Andrew resisted, citing the long-term lease he holds on Royal Lodge and asserting that he had privately funded renovations and maintenance. The standoff became a proxy war over accountability: whether symbolic consequences would match the gravity of the scandal that engulfed him. While Andrew maintained his right to remain under the lease terms, the broader monarchy faced reputational strain so long as he continued residing there. The struggle over Royal Lodge ultimately reflected the tension between legal entitlement and public legitimacy, underscoring how deeply the Epstein fallout reshaped Andrew’s standing within both the Royal Family and public life.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>644</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Sarah Kellen Congressional Transcript (Part 14) (6/18/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-sarah-kellen-congressional-transcript-part-14-6-18-26--72571348</link><description><![CDATA[Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein’s operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein’s abuse machine function.<br /><br />The skeptical read is that Kellen’s testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein’s access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein’s criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nPDWYcqxugpod1-b98xuayS-RkUtrcyS/view?pli=1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google Drive</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72571348</guid><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72571348/kellentranscripts14.mp3" length="11635191" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/fab1e239-3a1f-4b56-b6fc-56f0ca1acdf4/fab1e239-3a1f-4b56-b6fc-56f0ca1acdf4.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/fab1e239-3a1f-4b56-b6fc-56f0ca1acdf4/fab1e239-3a1f-4b56-b6fc-56f0ca1acdf4.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/fab1e239-3a1f-4b56-b6fc-56f0ca1acdf4/fab1e239-3a1f-4b56-b6fc-56f0ca1acdf4.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein’s operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein’s operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein’s abuse machine function.<br /><br />The skeptical read is that Kellen’s testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein’s access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein’s criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nPDWYcqxugpod1-b98xuayS-RkUtrcyS/view?pli=1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google Drive</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>728</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The DOJ Blamed a Systemic Breakdown In Epstein's Death—So Where Are the Reforms? (Part 2) (6/18/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-doj-blamed-a-systemic-breakdown-in-epstein-s-death-so-where-are-the-reforms-part-2-6-18-26--72571345</link><description><![CDATA[The Justice Department’s explanation for Jeffrey Epstein’s death rests on the claim that a sweeping systemic breakdown occurred inside the Metropolitan Correctional Center: guards failed to conduct required rounds, records were falsified, Epstein was left without a cellmate, staffing was inadequate, supervision failed, and surveillance systems were defective. Yet if those failures were truly broad enough to explain how one of the most consequential federal detainees in modern history died behind bars, they should have triggered an equally broad response. Instead, there was no unmistakable national overhaul of federal detention practices, no transparent accounting of responsibility up the chain of command, no comprehensive public proof that staffing, suicide-prevention, surveillance, and supervisory failures were permanently corrected, and few consequences proportional to the scale of the disaster...<br /><br />That absence of reform does not by itself prove Epstein was murdered, but it badly weakens the government’s credibility. The DOJ cannot use chronic understaffing, ignored procedures, malfunctioning equipment, and falsified records to explain his death while allowing many of those same problems to persist years later. “Systemic breakdown” has become a convenient way to spread blame so widely that almost no one is held meaningfully responsible. The government acknowledged enough institutional failure to defend its conclusion, but not enough to force the institution to change. Until there is full transparency, measurable reform, and serious accountability, the official explanation will continue to look less like a resolved case and more like a demand that the public simply trust the same system that failed.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72571345</guid><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 18:30:05 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72571345/epsteindeathsystemic2.mp3" length="20065846" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/aad6de5b-1b68-40ee-b856-232f669da6e2/aad6de5b-1b68-40ee-b856-232f669da6e2.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/aad6de5b-1b68-40ee-b856-232f669da6e2/aad6de5b-1b68-40ee-b856-232f669da6e2.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/aad6de5b-1b68-40ee-b856-232f669da6e2/aad6de5b-1b68-40ee-b856-232f669da6e2.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Justice Department’s explanation for Jeffrey Epstein’s death rests on the claim that a sweeping systemic breakdown occurred inside the Metropolitan Correctional Center: guards failed to conduct required rounds, records were falsified, Epstein was...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Justice Department’s explanation for Jeffrey Epstein’s death rests on the claim that a sweeping systemic breakdown occurred inside the Metropolitan Correctional Center: guards failed to conduct required rounds, records were falsified, Epstein was left without a cellmate, staffing was inadequate, supervision failed, and surveillance systems were defective. Yet if those failures were truly broad enough to explain how one of the most consequential federal detainees in modern history died behind bars, they should have triggered an equally broad response. Instead, there was no unmistakable national overhaul of federal detention practices, no transparent accounting of responsibility up the chain of command, no comprehensive public proof that staffing, suicide-prevention, surveillance, and supervisory failures were permanently corrected, and few consequences proportional to the scale of the disaster...<br /><br />That absence of reform does not by itself prove Epstein was murdered, but it badly weakens the government’s credibility. The DOJ cannot use chronic understaffing, ignored procedures, malfunctioning equipment, and falsified records to explain his death while allowing many of those same problems to persist years later. “Systemic breakdown” has become a convenient way to spread blame so widely that almost no one is held meaningfully responsible. The government acknowledged enough institutional failure to defend its conclusion, but not enough to force the institution to change. Until there is full transparency, measurable reform, and serious accountability, the official explanation will continue to look less like a resolved case and more like a demand that the public simply trust the same system that failed.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1255</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The DOJ Blamed a Systemic Breakdown In Epstein's Death—So Where Are the Reforms? (Part 1) (6/18/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-doj-blamed-a-systemic-breakdown-in-epstein-s-death-so-where-are-the-reforms-part-1-6-18-26--72571343</link><description><![CDATA[The Justice Department’s explanation for Jeffrey Epstein’s death rests on the claim that a sweeping systemic breakdown occurred inside the Metropolitan Correctional Center: guards failed to conduct required rounds, records were falsified, Epstein was left without a cellmate, staffing was inadequate, supervision failed, and surveillance systems were defective. Yet if those failures were truly broad enough to explain how one of the most consequential federal detainees in modern history died behind bars, they should have triggered an equally broad response. Instead, there was no unmistakable national overhaul of federal detention practices, no transparent accounting of responsibility up the chain of command, no comprehensive public proof that staffing, suicide-prevention, surveillance, and supervisory failures were permanently corrected, and few consequences proportional to the scale of the disaster...<br /><br />That absence of reform does not by itself prove Epstein was murdered, but it badly weakens the government’s credibility. The DOJ cannot use chronic understaffing, ignored procedures, malfunctioning equipment, and falsified records to explain his death while allowing many of those same problems to persist years later. “Systemic breakdown” has become a convenient way to spread blame so widely that almost no one is held meaningfully responsible. The government acknowledged enough institutional failure to defend its conclusion, but not enough to force the institution to change. Until there is full transparency, measurable reform, and serious accountability, the official explanation will continue to look less like a resolved case and more like a demand that the public simply trust the same system that failed.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72571343</guid><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72571343/epsteindeathsystemic1.mp3" length="12748217" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e6b5e5dd-d757-4197-8bc9-8e9aff89a8b3/e6b5e5dd-d757-4197-8bc9-8e9aff89a8b3.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e6b5e5dd-d757-4197-8bc9-8e9aff89a8b3/e6b5e5dd-d757-4197-8bc9-8e9aff89a8b3.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e6b5e5dd-d757-4197-8bc9-8e9aff89a8b3/e6b5e5dd-d757-4197-8bc9-8e9aff89a8b3.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Justice Department’s explanation for Jeffrey Epstein’s death rests on the claim that a sweeping systemic breakdown occurred inside the Metropolitan Correctional Center: guards failed to conduct required rounds, records were falsified, Epstein was...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Justice Department’s explanation for Jeffrey Epstein’s death rests on the claim that a sweeping systemic breakdown occurred inside the Metropolitan Correctional Center: guards failed to conduct required rounds, records were falsified, Epstein was left without a cellmate, staffing was inadequate, supervision failed, and surveillance systems were defective. Yet if those failures were truly broad enough to explain how one of the most consequential federal detainees in modern history died behind bars, they should have triggered an equally broad response. Instead, there was no unmistakable national overhaul of federal detention practices, no transparent accounting of responsibility up the chain of command, no comprehensive public proof that staffing, suicide-prevention, surveillance, and supervisory failures were permanently corrected, and few consequences proportional to the scale of the disaster...<br /><br />That absence of reform does not by itself prove Epstein was murdered, but it badly weakens the government’s credibility. The DOJ cannot use chronic understaffing, ignored procedures, malfunctioning equipment, and falsified records to explain his death while allowing many of those same problems to persist years later. “Systemic breakdown” has become a convenient way to spread blame so widely that almost no one is held meaningfully responsible. The government acknowledged enough institutional failure to defend its conclusion, but not enough to force the institution to change. Until there is full transparency, measurable reform, and serious accountability, the official explanation will continue to look less like a resolved case and more like a demand that the public simply trust the same system that failed.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>797</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Lawmakers Question Maxwell’s Minimum-Security Transfer (6/18/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/lawmakers-question-maxwell-s-minimum-security-transfer-6-18-26--72571344</link><description><![CDATA[Democratic Representatives Jamie Raskin and Robert Garcia toured Federal Prison Camp Bryan in Texas, where Ghislaine Maxwell is serving her 20-year sentence, and came away questioning why a convicted sex trafficker was placed in such a lightly restricted setting. Garcia described the minimum-security facility as resembling a “park-like community college,” complete with fountains, trees and broad freedom of movement. The lawmakers said prison officials could not adequately explain Maxwell’s transfer from a more restrictive Florida institution, particularly because she reportedly remains the only convicted sex offender among more than 600 inmates. They were also denied an opportunity to speak with Maxwell during the visit.<br /><br />Raskin and Garcia said more than a dozen whistleblowers have alleged that Maxwell receives unusual privileges, including bottled water and meals delivered to her, unsupervised laptop use, access to staff-only areas, private chapel visits and fewer cellmates than other prisoners. They accused Bureau of Prisons officials of obstructing their questions about Maxwell’s treatment, alleged retaliation against whistleblowers and reports of sexual assault inside the facility. Maxwell’s attorney denied that she is receiving preferential treatment, arguing that humane conditions should not be portrayed as favoritism, while the Bureau of Prisons maintained that its rules prohibit special treatment for any inmate.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.thetimes.com/us/news-today/article/ghislaine-maxwells-prison-park-visit-facility-zfd0shv8s" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ghislaine Maxwell’s prison is ‘park-like’, congressmen claim</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72571344</guid><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72571344/congressmaxwellspecialtreatment.mp3" length="10682244" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/955b896d-5841-4646-adc7-ba133831de61/955b896d-5841-4646-adc7-ba133831de61.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/955b896d-5841-4646-adc7-ba133831de61/955b896d-5841-4646-adc7-ba133831de61.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/955b896d-5841-4646-adc7-ba133831de61/955b896d-5841-4646-adc7-ba133831de61.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Democratic Representatives Jamie Raskin and Robert Garcia toured Federal Prison Camp Bryan in Texas, where Ghislaine Maxwell is serving her 20-year sentence, and came away questioning why a convicted sex trafficker was placed in such a lightly...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Democratic Representatives Jamie Raskin and Robert Garcia toured Federal Prison Camp Bryan in Texas, where Ghislaine Maxwell is serving her 20-year sentence, and came away questioning why a convicted sex trafficker was placed in such a lightly restricted setting. Garcia described the minimum-security facility as resembling a “park-like community college,” complete with fountains, trees and broad freedom of movement. The lawmakers said prison officials could not adequately explain Maxwell’s transfer from a more restrictive Florida institution, particularly because she reportedly remains the only convicted sex offender among more than 600 inmates. They were also denied an opportunity to speak with Maxwell during the visit.<br /><br />Raskin and Garcia said more than a dozen whistleblowers have alleged that Maxwell receives unusual privileges, including bottled water and meals delivered to her, unsupervised laptop use, access to staff-only areas, private chapel visits and fewer cellmates than other prisoners. They accused Bureau of Prisons officials of obstructing their questions about Maxwell’s treatment, alleged retaliation against whistleblowers and reports of sexual assault inside the facility. Maxwell’s attorney denied that she is receiving preferential treatment, arguing that humane conditions should not be portrayed as favoritism, while the Bureau of Prisons maintained that its rules prohibit special treatment for any inmate.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.thetimes.com/us/news-today/article/ghislaine-maxwells-prison-park-visit-facility-zfd0shv8s" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ghislaine Maxwell’s prison is ‘park-like’, congressmen claim</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>668</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Andrew Excluded From Major Royal Ceremony as Isolation Deepens (6/18/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/andrew-excluded-from-major-royal-ceremony-as-isolation-deepens-6-18-26--72571346</link><description><![CDATA[Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has reportedly been left feeling increasingly isolated after being excluded entirely from this year’s Order of the Garter ceremony at Windsor Castle. Andrew had participated in the event in previous years and attended its private pre-ceremony lunch as recently as last year, but his removal from the order meant he was absent from every part of the 2026 observance. A source described the occasion as a painful reminder of everything Andrew has lost, particularly because senior members of his family—including King Charles, Queen Camilla and Prince William—continued with the ceremony without him.<br /><br />His exclusion followed the loss of his remaining royal titles and honors as controversy over his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein continued to engulf him. Andrew was also absent from Trooping the Colour and is now living in Norfolk while police investigate allegations of misconduct in public office; he was arrested on suspicion of that offense in February and later released under investigation. Andrew has consistently denied wrongdoing, but his complete disappearance from major royal occasions shows how thoroughly the monarchy has distanced itself from him and how far he has fallen from his former position within the institution.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72571346</guid><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72571346/noceremoniesforandrew.mp3" length="10378388" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a932f72a-bf3a-4387-8c35-d864cc1a11a2/a932f72a-bf3a-4387-8c35-d864cc1a11a2.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a932f72a-bf3a-4387-8c35-d864cc1a11a2/a932f72a-bf3a-4387-8c35-d864cc1a11a2.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a932f72a-bf3a-4387-8c35-d864cc1a11a2/a932f72a-bf3a-4387-8c35-d864cc1a11a2.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has reportedly been left feeling increasingly isolated after being excluded entirely from this year’s Order of the Garter ceremony at Windsor Castle. Andrew had participated in the event in previous years and attended its...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has reportedly been left feeling increasingly isolated after being excluded entirely from this year’s Order of the Garter ceremony at Windsor Castle. Andrew had participated in the event in previous years and attended its private pre-ceremony lunch as recently as last year, but his removal from the order meant he was absent from every part of the 2026 observance. A source described the occasion as a painful reminder of everything Andrew has lost, particularly because senior members of his family—including King Charles, Queen Camilla and Prince William—continued with the ceremony without him.<br /><br />His exclusion followed the loss of his remaining royal titles and honors as controversy over his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein continued to engulf him. Andrew was also absent from Trooping the Colour and is now living in Norfolk while police investigate allegations of misconduct in public office; he was arrested on suspicion of that offense in February and later released under investigation. Andrew has consistently denied wrongdoing, but his complete disappearance from major royal occasions shows how thoroughly the monarchy has distanced itself from him and how far he has fallen from his former position within the institution.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>649</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   Ghislaine Maxwell And The Aftermath Of Her Indictment (6/17/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-ghislaine-maxwell-and-the-aftermath-of-her-indictment-6-17-26--72566134</link><description><![CDATA[After Ghislaine Maxwell was convicted in December 2021 on five federal counts tied to Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual-abuse operation, attention immediately shifted to sentencing, the survivors, and the unanswered question of who else had participated in or enabled the scheme. In June 2022, Judge Alison Nathan sentenced Maxwell to 20 years in federal prison, describing her conduct as calculated and emphasizing that she had helped identify, groom and normalize the abuse of underage girls. Several survivors addressed the court, portraying Maxwell not as a passive companion to Epstein but as an active manipulator who helped make vulnerable girls feel safe before their exploitation. The conviction provided a rare measure of accountability, but it did not produce the broader reckoning many expected: no sweeping prosecution of additional alleged facilitators followed, and many records connected to Epstein’s network remained sealed, redacted or fiercely contested.<br /><br />Maxwell then began a prolonged campaign to overturn the verdict, arguing that Epstein’s Florida non-prosecution agreement protected her, that juror misconduct had compromised the trial and that procedural errors required a new one. The Second Circuit upheld her conviction in September 2024, and the Supreme Court declined to hear her appeal on October 6, 2025, leaving the conviction and sentence intact. Her case nevertheless remained politically explosive: she was transferred in August 2025 to a minimum-security federal prison camp in Bryan, Texas, after meeting privately with senior Justice Department officials, prompting accusations that she was receiving preferential treatment. She later invoked the Fifth Amendment before Congress while indicating that she might provide information in exchange for clemency, reinforcing the sense that—even after her conviction—the full story of Epstein’s operation, its enablers and the institutional failures surrounding it had still not been publicly resolved.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72566134</guid><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72566134/megamaxguiltyaftermath.mp3" length="80844217" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/38f7f416-48df-42bd-bf6c-cf7552059ae3/38f7f416-48df-42bd-bf6c-cf7552059ae3.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/38f7f416-48df-42bd-bf6c-cf7552059ae3/38f7f416-48df-42bd-bf6c-cf7552059ae3.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/38f7f416-48df-42bd-bf6c-cf7552059ae3/38f7f416-48df-42bd-bf6c-cf7552059ae3.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>After Ghislaine Maxwell was convicted in December 2021 on five federal counts tied to Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual-abuse operation, attention immediately shifted to sentencing, the survivors, and the unanswered question of who else had participated in or...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[After Ghislaine Maxwell was convicted in December 2021 on five federal counts tied to Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual-abuse operation, attention immediately shifted to sentencing, the survivors, and the unanswered question of who else had participated in or enabled the scheme. In June 2022, Judge Alison Nathan sentenced Maxwell to 20 years in federal prison, describing her conduct as calculated and emphasizing that she had helped identify, groom and normalize the abuse of underage girls. Several survivors addressed the court, portraying Maxwell not as a passive companion to Epstein but as an active manipulator who helped make vulnerable girls feel safe before their exploitation. The conviction provided a rare measure of accountability, but it did not produce the broader reckoning many expected: no sweeping prosecution of additional alleged facilitators followed, and many records connected to Epstein’s network remained sealed, redacted or fiercely contested.<br /><br />Maxwell then began a prolonged campaign to overturn the verdict, arguing that Epstein’s Florida non-prosecution agreement protected her, that juror misconduct had compromised the trial and that procedural errors required a new one. The Second Circuit upheld her conviction in September 2024, and the Supreme Court declined to hear her appeal on October 6, 2025, leaving the conviction and sentence intact. Her case nevertheless remained politically explosive: she was transferred in August 2025 to a minimum-security federal prison camp in Bryan, Texas, after meeting privately with senior Justice Department officials, prompting accusations that she was receiving preferential treatment. She later invoked the Fifth Amendment before Congress while indicating that she might provide information in exchange for clemency, reinforcing the sense that—even after her conviction—the full story of Epstein’s operation, its enablers and the institutional failures surrounding it had still not been publicly resolved.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>5053</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  How New York And Florida Failed The Survivors (6/18/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-how-new-york-and-florida-failed-the-survivors-6-18-26--72566135</link><description><![CDATA[Florida failed Epstein’s survivors at nearly every level. Palm Beach police built a serious case showing that Epstein had sexually abused numerous underage girls, yet state prosecutors reduced the matter to charges that treated his conduct more like ordinary prostitution than an organized pattern of child exploitation. Federal prosecutors then negotiated an extraordinarily lenient non-prosecution agreement behind closed doors, ending the broader investigation, protecting potential co-conspirators and keeping the survivors uninformed while Epstein’s lawyers shaped the outcome. He ultimately served roughly 13 months under unusually generous work-release conditions, allowing him to leave jail for long stretches while the women and girls he abused were denied a meaningful voice in the process. The Justice Department later concluded that then-U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta exercised “poor judgment,” but that finding offered little accountability for a deal that denied survivors the justice they had every reason to expect.<br /><br /><br />New York’s failure came later, after Epstein’s 2008 conviction had already made the danger unmistakable. He returned to Manhattan, remained surrounded by wealth and influence, maintained access to young women and continued moving through elite social and financial circles with remarkably little interference. New York authorities allowed him to register as a lower-level sex offender until a judge ordered the highest-risk classification, while major institutions continued doing business with him despite obvious warning signs. Although federal prosecutors in Manhattan finally arrested him in 2019, that action came only after years of additional alleged abuse, and his death in federal custody eliminated the possibility of a public trial that could have exposed the full operation and forced other participants to answer questions. Florida gave Epstein the deal that preserved his freedom; New York gave him the time, access and institutional tolerance to continue operating, leaving survivors to carry the consequences of failures committed by both states.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me: <br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72566135</guid><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72566135/meganewyorkfailedepsteinsurvivors.mp3" length="46189131" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a540b3b1-0dc0-4312-829f-e9bea713619d/a540b3b1-0dc0-4312-829f-e9bea713619d.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a540b3b1-0dc0-4312-829f-e9bea713619d/a540b3b1-0dc0-4312-829f-e9bea713619d.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a540b3b1-0dc0-4312-829f-e9bea713619d/a540b3b1-0dc0-4312-829f-e9bea713619d.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Florida failed Epstein’s survivors at nearly every level. Palm Beach police built a serious case showing that Epstein had sexually abused numerous underage girls, yet state prosecutors reduced the matter to charges that treated his conduct more like...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Florida failed Epstein’s survivors at nearly every level. Palm Beach police built a serious case showing that Epstein had sexually abused numerous underage girls, yet state prosecutors reduced the matter to charges that treated his conduct more like ordinary prostitution than an organized pattern of child exploitation. Federal prosecutors then negotiated an extraordinarily lenient non-prosecution agreement behind closed doors, ending the broader investigation, protecting potential co-conspirators and keeping the survivors uninformed while Epstein’s lawyers shaped the outcome. He ultimately served roughly 13 months under unusually generous work-release conditions, allowing him to leave jail for long stretches while the women and girls he abused were denied a meaningful voice in the process. The Justice Department later concluded that then-U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta exercised “poor judgment,” but that finding offered little accountability for a deal that denied survivors the justice they had every reason to expect.<br /><br /><br />New York’s failure came later, after Epstein’s 2008 conviction had already made the danger unmistakable. He returned to Manhattan, remained surrounded by wealth and influence, maintained access to young women and continued moving through elite social and financial circles with remarkably little interference. New York authorities allowed him to register as a lower-level sex offender until a judge ordered the highest-risk classification, while major institutions continued doing business with him despite obvious warning signs. Although federal prosecutors in Manhattan finally arrested him in 2019, that action came only after years of additional alleged abuse, and his death in federal custody eliminated the possibility of a public trial that could have exposed the full operation and forced other participants to answer questions. Florida gave Epstein the deal that preserved his freedom; New York gave him the time, access and institutional tolerance to continue operating, leaving survivors to carry the consequences of failures committed by both states.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me: <br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2887</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   The Curious Case of Jeffrey Epstein And The Missing RICO Charges (6/17/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-curious-case-of-jeffrey-epstein-and-the-missing-rico-charges-6-17-26--72566136</link><description><![CDATA[Keith Raniere and R. Kelly were prosecuted under the federal racketeering statute because prosecutors portrayed each man as the head of an organized enterprise that used employees, loyalists and associates to facilitate sexual abuse and protect the operation. Raniere was convicted of racketeering and racketeering conspiracy based on crimes committed through NXIVM, including sex trafficking, forced labor, extortion and obstruction. Kelly was likewise convicted of racketeering after prosecutors argued that his managers, assistants and other members of his organization helped recruit women and girls, arrange travel, enforce rules and conceal years of sexual exploitation. In both cases, the government treated the surrounding network not as incidental background, but as part of the criminal machinery.<br /><br />Epstein’s operation appeared to contain many of the same features: recruiters, assistants, employees, pilots, financial personnel and alleged facilitators who helped locate girls, schedule encounters, manage properties and preserve his access to victims. Yet when federal prosecutors investigated him in Florida, they did not bring a racketeering case; instead, they negotiated a secret non-prosecution agreement that ended the federal investigation and extended protection to named and unnamed potential co-conspirators. Even when Epstein was finally charged in New York in 2019, prosecutors charged sex trafficking and conspiracy rather than RICO, and his death prevented the case from reaching trial. That disparity does not prove Epstein was an intelligence asset or formally protected by the government, but it understandably fuels that suspicion: the government dismantled the organizations surrounding Raniere and Kelly, while Epstein received an extraordinary agreement that protected not only him, but potentially the very network prosecutors might otherwise have treated as a criminal enterprise.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72566136</guid><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72566136/megaricoranierekellydiddynotepstein.mp3" length="78146320" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2a69edad-8030-4c91-8b4c-7af02273e5c2/2a69edad-8030-4c91-8b4c-7af02273e5c2.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2a69edad-8030-4c91-8b4c-7af02273e5c2/2a69edad-8030-4c91-8b4c-7af02273e5c2.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2a69edad-8030-4c91-8b4c-7af02273e5c2/2a69edad-8030-4c91-8b4c-7af02273e5c2.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Keith Raniere and R. Kelly were prosecuted under the federal racketeering statute because prosecutors portrayed each man as the head of an organized enterprise that used employees, loyalists and associates to facilitate sexual abuse and protect the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Keith Raniere and R. Kelly were prosecuted under the federal racketeering statute because prosecutors portrayed each man as the head of an organized enterprise that used employees, loyalists and associates to facilitate sexual abuse and protect the operation. Raniere was convicted of racketeering and racketeering conspiracy based on crimes committed through NXIVM, including sex trafficking, forced labor, extortion and obstruction. Kelly was likewise convicted of racketeering after prosecutors argued that his managers, assistants and other members of his organization helped recruit women and girls, arrange travel, enforce rules and conceal years of sexual exploitation. In both cases, the government treated the surrounding network not as incidental background, but as part of the criminal machinery.<br /><br />Epstein’s operation appeared to contain many of the same features: recruiters, assistants, employees, pilots, financial personnel and alleged facilitators who helped locate girls, schedule encounters, manage properties and preserve his access to victims. Yet when federal prosecutors investigated him in Florida, they did not bring a racketeering case; instead, they negotiated a secret non-prosecution agreement that ended the federal investigation and extended protection to named and unnamed potential co-conspirators. Even when Epstein was finally charged in New York in 2019, prosecutors charged sex trafficking and conspiracy rather than RICO, and his death prevented the case from reaching trial. That disparity does not prove Epstein was an intelligence asset or formally protected by the government, but it understandably fuels that suspicion: the government dismantled the organizations surrounding Raniere and Kelly, while Epstein received an extraordinary agreement that protected not only him, but potentially the very network prosecutors might otherwise have treated as a criminal enterprise.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4885</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>How The Federal Government Broke The Law When It Comes to Epstein And The CVRA (Part 2)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/how-the-federal-government-broke-the-law-when-it-comes-to-epstein-and-the-cvra-part-2--72550891</link><description><![CDATA[The Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA) was supposed to guarantee fairness and transparency for victims—making sure they were informed, included, and respected in the legal process. But when Jeffrey Epstein came along, that promise evaporated. Federal prosecutors secretly cut a Non-Prosecution Agreement that protected not only Epstein but also his “potential co-conspirators,” violating the very law designed to stop such backroom deals. The victims weren’t told; they found out months later from the press. The same Department of Justice that preaches accountability deliberately hid the deal, broke federal law, and then argued that the CVRA didn’t apply because no federal charges were filed—an argument so twisted it turned their own crime into a loophole.<br /><br />Instead of punishment, Epstein got 13 months in county jail with daily work release, while the prosecutors who betrayed the victims got promotions. The courts sided with the government, ruling that since the feds never formally charged Epstein, the survivors technically weren’t “victims” under the CVRA. The result was a legal farce that showed how easily the system bends for the powerful. The law that was supposed to protect victims ended up protecting predators, proving once again that in America, justice isn’t blind—it just looks away when the wrong people are involved.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72550891</guid><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72550891/cvra2.mp3" length="15370911" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3237b1c9-d974-467d-ad75-8ecb2f4e0f14/3237b1c9-d974-467d-ad75-8ecb2f4e0f14.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3237b1c9-d974-467d-ad75-8ecb2f4e0f14/3237b1c9-d974-467d-ad75-8ecb2f4e0f14.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3237b1c9-d974-467d-ad75-8ecb2f4e0f14/3237b1c9-d974-467d-ad75-8ecb2f4e0f14.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA) was supposed to guarantee fairness and transparency for victims—making sure they were informed, included, and respected in the legal process. But when Jeffrey Epstein came along, that promise evaporated. Federal...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA) was supposed to guarantee fairness and transparency for victims—making sure they were informed, included, and respected in the legal process. But when Jeffrey Epstein came along, that promise evaporated. Federal prosecutors secretly cut a Non-Prosecution Agreement that protected not only Epstein but also his “potential co-conspirators,” violating the very law designed to stop such backroom deals. The victims weren’t told; they found out months later from the press. The same Department of Justice that preaches accountability deliberately hid the deal, broke federal law, and then argued that the CVRA didn’t apply because no federal charges were filed—an argument so twisted it turned their own crime into a loophole.<br /><br />Instead of punishment, Epstein got 13 months in county jail with daily work release, while the prosecutors who betrayed the victims got promotions. The courts sided with the government, ruling that since the feds never formally charged Epstein, the survivors technically weren’t “victims” under the CVRA. The result was a legal farce that showed how easily the system bends for the powerful. The law that was supposed to protect victims ended up protecting predators, proving once again that in America, justice isn’t blind—it just looks away when the wrong people are involved.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>961</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>How The Federal Government Broke The Law When It Comes to Epstein And The CVRA (Part 1)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/how-the-federal-government-broke-the-law-when-it-comes-to-epstein-and-the-cvra-part-1--72550892</link><description><![CDATA[The Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA) was supposed to guarantee fairness and transparency for victims—making sure they were informed, included, and respected in the legal process. But when Jeffrey Epstein came along, that promise evaporated. Federal prosecutors secretly cut a Non-Prosecution Agreement that protected not only Epstein but also his “potential co-conspirators,” violating the very law designed to stop such backroom deals. The victims weren’t told; they found out months later from the press. The same Department of Justice that preaches accountability deliberately hid the deal, broke federal law, and then argued that the CVRA didn’t apply because no federal charges were filed—an argument so twisted it turned their own crime into a loophole.<br /><br />Instead of punishment, Epstein got 13 months in county jail with daily work release, while the prosecutors who betrayed the victims got promotions. The courts sided with the government, ruling that since the feds never formally charged Epstein, the survivors technically weren’t “victims” under the CVRA. The result was a legal farce that showed how easily the system bends for the powerful. The law that was supposed to protect victims ended up protecting predators, proving once again that in America, justice isn’t blind—it just looks away when the wrong people are involved.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72550892</guid><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72550892/cvra1.mp3" length="11206783" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/754fd1a9-5392-4369-b15c-b6ddfcf9a680/754fd1a9-5392-4369-b15c-b6ddfcf9a680.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/754fd1a9-5392-4369-b15c-b6ddfcf9a680/754fd1a9-5392-4369-b15c-b6ddfcf9a680.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/754fd1a9-5392-4369-b15c-b6ddfcf9a680/754fd1a9-5392-4369-b15c-b6ddfcf9a680.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA) was supposed to guarantee fairness and transparency for victims—making sure they were informed, included, and respected in the legal process. But when Jeffrey Epstein came along, that promise evaporated. Federal...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA) was supposed to guarantee fairness and transparency for victims—making sure they were informed, included, and respected in the legal process. But when Jeffrey Epstein came along, that promise evaporated. Federal prosecutors secretly cut a Non-Prosecution Agreement that protected not only Epstein but also his “potential co-conspirators,” violating the very law designed to stop such backroom deals. The victims weren’t told; they found out months later from the press. The same Department of Justice that preaches accountability deliberately hid the deal, broke federal law, and then argued that the CVRA didn’t apply because no federal charges were filed—an argument so twisted it turned their own crime into a loophole.<br /><br />Instead of punishment, Epstein got 13 months in county jail with daily work release, while the prosecutors who betrayed the victims got promotions. The courts sided with the government, ruling that since the feds never formally charged Epstein, the survivors technically weren’t “victims” under the CVRA. The result was a legal farce that showed how easily the system bends for the powerful. The law that was supposed to protect victims ended up protecting predators, proving once again that in America, justice isn’t blind—it just looks away when the wrong people are involved.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>701</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Jeffrey Epstein  And The Myth Of The "Perfect Victim"  (Part 2)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/jeffrey-epstein-and-the-myth-of-the-perfect-victim-part-2--72550897</link><description><![CDATA[The myth of the “perfect victim” is the poisonous illusion that a person must be flawless, pure, and morally spotless to deserve justice—and it’s the very lie that allowed Jeffrey Epstein to operate in plain sight. He built his empire on exploiting society’s prejudices, targeting poor and vulnerable girls precisely because he knew people would doubt them. When his crimes surfaced, the world didn’t ask how he got away with it; it asked what his victims had done wrong. That obsession with perfection became his greatest shield—turning every imperfection into a reason for disbelief, every scar into supposed evidence of guilt.<br /><br /><br />This narrative isn’t just cruel—it’s complicit. It teaches the powerful that they can destroy lives as long as their victims don’t fit the fairy-tale mold of innocence. It conditions the public to defend predators and question survivors, ensuring the next Epstein will thrive in the same moral vacuum. The truth is, real victims are messy, human, and imperfect—and that humanity should never disqualify them from justice. The “perfect victim” never existed; she was invented by monsters who needed a way to keep their hands clean. The sooner we kill that myth, the sooner we end the culture that keeps making predators untouchable.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72550897</guid><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72550897/mythperfect2.mp3" length="11128207" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9e441200-d7a8-417c-b180-7a656e660c9c/9e441200-d7a8-417c-b180-7a656e660c9c.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9e441200-d7a8-417c-b180-7a656e660c9c/9e441200-d7a8-417c-b180-7a656e660c9c.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9e441200-d7a8-417c-b180-7a656e660c9c/9e441200-d7a8-417c-b180-7a656e660c9c.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The myth of the “perfect victim” is the poisonous illusion that a person must be flawless, pure, and morally spotless to deserve justice—and it’s the very lie that allowed Jeffrey Epstein to operate in plain sight. He built his empire on exploiting...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The myth of the “perfect victim” is the poisonous illusion that a person must be flawless, pure, and morally spotless to deserve justice—and it’s the very lie that allowed Jeffrey Epstein to operate in plain sight. He built his empire on exploiting society’s prejudices, targeting poor and vulnerable girls precisely because he knew people would doubt them. When his crimes surfaced, the world didn’t ask how he got away with it; it asked what his victims had done wrong. That obsession with perfection became his greatest shield—turning every imperfection into a reason for disbelief, every scar into supposed evidence of guilt.<br /><br /><br />This narrative isn’t just cruel—it’s complicit. It teaches the powerful that they can destroy lives as long as their victims don’t fit the fairy-tale mold of innocence. It conditions the public to defend predators and question survivors, ensuring the next Epstein will thrive in the same moral vacuum. The truth is, real victims are messy, human, and imperfect—and that humanity should never disqualify them from justice. The “perfect victim” never existed; she was invented by monsters who needed a way to keep their hands clean. The sooner we kill that myth, the sooner we end the culture that keeps making predators untouchable.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>696</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Jeffrey Epstein  And The Myth Of The "Perfect Victim"  (Part 1)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/jeffrey-epstein-and-the-myth-of-the-perfect-victim-part-1--72550890</link><description><![CDATA[The myth of the “perfect victim” is the poisonous illusion that a person must be flawless, pure, and morally spotless to deserve justice—and it’s the very lie that allowed Jeffrey Epstein to operate in plain sight. He built his empire on exploiting society’s prejudices, targeting poor and vulnerable girls precisely because he knew people would doubt them. When his crimes surfaced, the world didn’t ask how he got away with it; it asked what his victims had done wrong. That obsession with perfection became his greatest shield—turning every imperfection into a reason for disbelief, every scar into supposed evidence of guilt.<br /><br /><br />This narrative isn’t just cruel—it’s complicit. It teaches the powerful that they can destroy lives as long as their victims don’t fit the fairy-tale mold of innocence. It conditions the public to defend predators and question survivors, ensuring the next Epstein will thrive in the same moral vacuum. The truth is, real victims are messy, human, and imperfect—and that humanity should never disqualify them from justice. The “perfect victim” never existed; she was invented by monsters who needed a way to keep their hands clean. The sooner we kill that myth, the sooner we end the culture that keeps making predators untouchable.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72550890</guid><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 22:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72550890/mythperfect1.mp3" length="12549268" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/092d9d2f-1b7a-4acc-9304-07a32cb5a165/092d9d2f-1b7a-4acc-9304-07a32cb5a165.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/092d9d2f-1b7a-4acc-9304-07a32cb5a165/092d9d2f-1b7a-4acc-9304-07a32cb5a165.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/092d9d2f-1b7a-4acc-9304-07a32cb5a165/092d9d2f-1b7a-4acc-9304-07a32cb5a165.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The myth of the “perfect victim” is the poisonous illusion that a person must be flawless, pure, and morally spotless to deserve justice—and it’s the very lie that allowed Jeffrey Epstein to operate in plain sight. He built his empire on exploiting...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The myth of the “perfect victim” is the poisonous illusion that a person must be flawless, pure, and morally spotless to deserve justice—and it’s the very lie that allowed Jeffrey Epstein to operate in plain sight. He built his empire on exploiting society’s prejudices, targeting poor and vulnerable girls precisely because he knew people would doubt them. When his crimes surfaced, the world didn’t ask how he got away with it; it asked what his victims had done wrong. That obsession with perfection became his greatest shield—turning every imperfection into a reason for disbelief, every scar into supposed evidence of guilt.<br /><br /><br />This narrative isn’t just cruel—it’s complicit. It teaches the powerful that they can destroy lives as long as their victims don’t fit the fairy-tale mold of innocence. It conditions the public to defend predators and question survivors, ensuring the next Epstein will thrive in the same moral vacuum. The truth is, real victims are messy, human, and imperfect—and that humanity should never disqualify them from justice. The “perfect victim” never existed; she was invented by monsters who needed a way to keep their hands clean. The sooner we kill that myth, the sooner we end the culture that keeps making predators untouchable.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>785</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Sarah Kellen Congressional Transcript (Part 13) (6/17/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-sarah-kellen-congressional-transcript-part-13-6-17-26--72556885</link><description><![CDATA[Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein’s operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein’s abuse machine function.<br /><br />The skeptical read is that Kellen’s testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein’s access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein’s criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nPDWYcqxugpod1-b98xuayS-RkUtrcyS/view?pli=1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google Drive</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72556885</guid><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72556885/kellentranscript13.mp3" length="13928951" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a07796ec-58b7-49fa-94ca-24b8648d9629/a07796ec-58b7-49fa-94ca-24b8648d9629.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a07796ec-58b7-49fa-94ca-24b8648d9629/a07796ec-58b7-49fa-94ca-24b8648d9629.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a07796ec-58b7-49fa-94ca-24b8648d9629/a07796ec-58b7-49fa-94ca-24b8648d9629.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein’s operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein’s operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein’s abuse machine function.<br /><br />The skeptical read is that Kellen’s testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein’s access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein’s criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nPDWYcqxugpod1-b98xuayS-RkUtrcyS/view?pli=1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google Drive</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>871</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Sarah Kellen Congressional Transcript (Part 12) (6/17/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-sarah-kellen-congressional-transcript-part-12-6-17-26--72556883</link><description><![CDATA[Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein’s operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein’s abuse machine function.<br /><br />The skeptical read is that Kellen’s testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein’s access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein’s criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nPDWYcqxugpod1-b98xuayS-RkUtrcyS/view?pli=1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google Drive</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72556883</guid><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 18:30:05 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72556883/kellentranscript12.mp3" length="22294404" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/41e9f160-852c-419b-afc4-8207e8bea3f5/41e9f160-852c-419b-afc4-8207e8bea3f5.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/41e9f160-852c-419b-afc4-8207e8bea3f5/41e9f160-852c-419b-afc4-8207e8bea3f5.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/41e9f160-852c-419b-afc4-8207e8bea3f5/41e9f160-852c-419b-afc4-8207e8bea3f5.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein’s operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein’s operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein’s abuse machine function.<br /><br />The skeptical read is that Kellen’s testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein’s access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein’s criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nPDWYcqxugpod1-b98xuayS-RkUtrcyS/view?pli=1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google Drive</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1394</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Sarah Kellen And The Allegations That Epstein Paid Off A Guard In Palm Beach (Part 2) (6/17/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/sarah-kellen-and-the-allegations-that-epstein-paid-off-a-guard-in-palm-beach-part-2-6-17-26--72556881</link><description><![CDATA[Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72556881</guid><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72556881/epsteinpaidjailguard2.mp3" length="16467217" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/21ae4d6c-608e-4ca7-b402-6f55cc94d644/21ae4d6c-608e-4ca7-b402-6f55cc94d644.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/21ae4d6c-608e-4ca7-b402-6f55cc94d644/21ae4d6c-608e-4ca7-b402-6f55cc94d644.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/21ae4d6c-608e-4ca7-b402-6f55cc94d644/21ae4d6c-608e-4ca7-b402-6f55cc94d644.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:duration>1030</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Sarah Kellen And The Allegations That Epstein Paid Off A Guard In Palm Beach (Part 1) (6/17/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/sarah-kellen-and-the-allegations-that-epstein-paid-off-a-guard-in-palm-beach-part-1-6-17-26--72556880</link><description><![CDATA[Sarah Kellen’s congressional testimony that Jeffrey Epstein allegedly paid a Palm Beach County jail guard for special favors may describe only one incident, but it fits the larger pattern of how Epstein operated. He treated institutions not as fixed systems of rules, but as collections of people, pressure points, and discretionary decisions that could be influenced through money, access, prestige, or personal relationships. His unusually permissive work-release arrangement already allowed him to leave jail for extended periods, maintain contact with employees, and preserve much of the machinery of his former life. If Kellen’s allegation is corroborated, it would suggest that even those extraordinary official privileges were not enough for him and that he continued seeking private exceptions inside the jail. The significance is not simply that one guard may have been compromised, but that Epstein apparently approached incarceration the same way he approached banks, universities, lawyers, politicians, and social circles: identify the weakness, cultivate the right person, and reshape the institution around his needs.<br /><br />That helps explain why moving the case away from a sweeping federal prosecution and into Florida state court was so valuable to Epstein. A federal case could have examined the full structure of his operation, exposed him to far greater punishment, encouraged witnesses to cooperate, and investigated the employees, recruiters, financial arrangements, travel, and possible co-conspirators surrounding him. The state resolution narrowed the conduct into limited prostitution-related charges, protected potential co-conspirators through the federal non-prosecution agreement, and placed Epstein inside a smaller local system where discretion could be exercised repeatedly on his behalf. His goal was not merely to receive a shorter sentence; it was to control the definition of the crime, the scope of the investigation, the conditions of confinement, and the public narrative afterward. The alleged guard payment, whether isolated or part of something broader, captures the central truth of the Epstein case: even when the justice system supposedly took control of him, Epstein continued searching for ways to take control of the justice system.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72556880</guid><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72556880/epsteinpaidjailguard1.mp3" length="11600083" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0fe617bd-93f0-47e0-b4ec-1d2e3e486ed7/0fe617bd-93f0-47e0-b4ec-1d2e3e486ed7.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0fe617bd-93f0-47e0-b4ec-1d2e3e486ed7/0fe617bd-93f0-47e0-b4ec-1d2e3e486ed7.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0fe617bd-93f0-47e0-b4ec-1d2e3e486ed7/0fe617bd-93f0-47e0-b4ec-1d2e3e486ed7.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Sarah Kellen’s congressional testimony that Jeffrey Epstein allegedly paid a Palm Beach County jail guard for special favors may describe only one incident, but it fits the larger pattern of how Epstein operated. He treated institutions not as fixed...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Sarah Kellen’s congressional testimony that Jeffrey Epstein allegedly paid a Palm Beach County jail guard for special favors may describe only one incident, but it fits the larger pattern of how Epstein operated. He treated institutions not as fixed systems of rules, but as collections of people, pressure points, and discretionary decisions that could be influenced through money, access, prestige, or personal relationships. His unusually permissive work-release arrangement already allowed him to leave jail for extended periods, maintain contact with employees, and preserve much of the machinery of his former life. If Kellen’s allegation is corroborated, it would suggest that even those extraordinary official privileges were not enough for him and that he continued seeking private exceptions inside the jail. The significance is not simply that one guard may have been compromised, but that Epstein apparently approached incarceration the same way he approached banks, universities, lawyers, politicians, and social circles: identify the weakness, cultivate the right person, and reshape the institution around his needs.<br /><br />That helps explain why moving the case away from a sweeping federal prosecution and into Florida state court was so valuable to Epstein. A federal case could have examined the full structure of his operation, exposed him to far greater punishment, encouraged witnesses to cooperate, and investigated the employees, recruiters, financial arrangements, travel, and possible co-conspirators surrounding him. The state resolution narrowed the conduct into limited prostitution-related charges, protected potential co-conspirators through the federal non-prosecution agreement, and placed Epstein inside a smaller local system where discretion could be exercised repeatedly on his behalf. His goal was not merely to receive a shorter sentence; it was to control the definition of the crime, the scope of the investigation, the conditions of confinement, and the public narrative afterward. The alleged guard payment, whether isolated or part of something broader, captures the central truth of the Epstein case: even when the justice system supposedly took control of him, Epstein continued searching for ways to take control of the justice system.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>725</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>New Account of Epstein’s Jail Behavior Demands Careful Scrutiny (6/17/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/new-account-of-epstein-s-jail-behavior-demands-careful-scrutiny-6-17-26--72556882</link><description><![CDATA[New reporting presents Nicholas Tartaglione’s account as evidence that Jeffrey Epstein had repeatedly attempted to take his own life before his death at the Metropolitan Correctional Center. Tartaglione claims Epstein asked how to make a noose, tried to fasten a bedsheet to a window grate, concealed another noose beneath his mattress and left behind a handwritten message referring to choosing the time to “say goodbye.” Another former cellmate, Efrain Reyes, reportedly described stopping Epstein from manipulating a bedsheet shortly before his death and warning prison staff that Epstein should not be left alone. Taken together, these accounts reinforce the official conclusion that Epstein died by suicide amid catastrophic failures by jail personnel, including the decision not to replace his cellmate and the failure to conduct required rounds.<br /><br />Tartaglione’s claims, however, should not be accepted uncritically. He is a convicted drug trafficker and quadruple murderer serving four consecutive life sentences, and he has offered shifting, sometimes contradictory narratives about Epstein while seeking legal relief for himself. Epstein reportedly initially claimed Tartaglione had attacked him during the unexplained July 23 incident before later withdrawing or softening that accusation, while the supposed suicide note was not documented in the major official investigations and its authorship has not been conclusively established. Tartaglione has also previously suggested that the government deliberately placed Epstein in danger, a theory that sits awkwardly beside his newer portrayal of Epstein as openly and repeatedly suicidal. His account may contain truthful details, but without independent corroboration it remains the testimony of a highly interested and deeply unreliable witness—not definitive proof of what occurred inside the MCC.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.thedailybeast.com/epstein-mystery-takes-new-twist-after-bombshell-revelations/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein Mystery Takes New Twist After Bombshell Revelations</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72556882</guid><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72556882/epsteindeathmoretartaglione.mp3" length="10823515" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/800fc124-cd74-4f3d-8cc1-be3ffb544bf1/800fc124-cd74-4f3d-8cc1-be3ffb544bf1.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/800fc124-cd74-4f3d-8cc1-be3ffb544bf1/800fc124-cd74-4f3d-8cc1-be3ffb544bf1.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/800fc124-cd74-4f3d-8cc1-be3ffb544bf1/800fc124-cd74-4f3d-8cc1-be3ffb544bf1.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>New reporting presents Nicholas Tartaglione’s account as evidence that Jeffrey Epstein had repeatedly attempted to take his own life before his death at the Metropolitan Correctional Center. Tartaglione claims Epstein asked how to make a noose, tried...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[New reporting presents Nicholas Tartaglione’s account as evidence that Jeffrey Epstein had repeatedly attempted to take his own life before his death at the Metropolitan Correctional Center. Tartaglione claims Epstein asked how to make a noose, tried to fasten a bedsheet to a window grate, concealed another noose beneath his mattress and left behind a handwritten message referring to choosing the time to “say goodbye.” Another former cellmate, Efrain Reyes, reportedly described stopping Epstein from manipulating a bedsheet shortly before his death and warning prison staff that Epstein should not be left alone. Taken together, these accounts reinforce the official conclusion that Epstein died by suicide amid catastrophic failures by jail personnel, including the decision not to replace his cellmate and the failure to conduct required rounds.<br /><br />Tartaglione’s claims, however, should not be accepted uncritically. He is a convicted drug trafficker and quadruple murderer serving four consecutive life sentences, and he has offered shifting, sometimes contradictory narratives about Epstein while seeking legal relief for himself. Epstein reportedly initially claimed Tartaglione had attacked him during the unexplained July 23 incident before later withdrawing or softening that accusation, while the supposed suicide note was not documented in the major official investigations and its authorship has not been conclusively established. Tartaglione has also previously suggested that the government deliberately placed Epstein in danger, a theory that sits awkwardly beside his newer portrayal of Epstein as openly and repeatedly suicidal. His account may contain truthful details, but without independent corroboration it remains the testimony of a highly interested and deeply unreliable witness—not definitive proof of what occurred inside the MCC.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.thedailybeast.com/epstein-mystery-takes-new-twist-after-bombshell-revelations/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein Mystery Takes New Twist After Bombshell Revelations</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>677</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   Julie K. Brown Dishes On Epstein And The Intelligence Community (6/17/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-julie-k-brown-dishes-on-epstein-and-the-intelligence-community-6-17-26--72550674</link><description><![CDATA[Julie K. Brown has said the possibility that Jeffrey Epstein had ties to an intelligence service should not be dismissed as wild conspiracy theory. She pointed to Epstein’s close relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, whose father, Robert Maxwell, was widely reported to have longstanding connections to Israeli intelligence, as well as Epstein’s access to powerful political, financial and diplomatic figures. Brown also noted Epstein’s relationship with former Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak, his unusual and poorly explained source of wealth, and reports that his homes were equipped with extensive surveillance systems capable of recording influential visitors. In her view, these circumstances create credible questions about whether Epstein gathered compromising material and whether intelligence interests played some role in his operation.<br /><br />Brown has been careful not to declare that Epstein was conclusively an agent of Mossad, the CIA or any other organization. Instead, she has argued that the intelligence angle is plausible, supported by enough troubling connections to warrant a serious investigation rather than ridicule or reflexive dismissal. She has also raised the possibility that Epstein’s suspected intelligence value could help explain why he received extraordinary protection, including the secret federal non-prosecution agreement that allowed him to escape far more serious charges in Florida. Brown’s position is ultimately that the available evidence does not prove the intelligence theory, but the unanswered questions surrounding Epstein’s money, surveillance, relationships and preferential treatment make it an avenue investigators and journalists should continue pursuing.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72550674</guid><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72550674/megaepsteinintelligencejuliekbrown.mp3" length="71732288" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/850174db-d274-4aa0-bc63-78af103fcc5e/850174db-d274-4aa0-bc63-78af103fcc5e.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/850174db-d274-4aa0-bc63-78af103fcc5e/850174db-d274-4aa0-bc63-78af103fcc5e.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/850174db-d274-4aa0-bc63-78af103fcc5e/850174db-d274-4aa0-bc63-78af103fcc5e.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Julie K. Brown has said the possibility that Jeffrey Epstein had ties to an intelligence service should not be dismissed as wild conspiracy theory. She pointed to Epstein’s close relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, whose father, Robert Maxwell, was...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Julie K. Brown has said the possibility that Jeffrey Epstein had ties to an intelligence service should not be dismissed as wild conspiracy theory. She pointed to Epstein’s close relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, whose father, Robert Maxwell, was widely reported to have longstanding connections to Israeli intelligence, as well as Epstein’s access to powerful political, financial and diplomatic figures. Brown also noted Epstein’s relationship with former Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak, his unusual and poorly explained source of wealth, and reports that his homes were equipped with extensive surveillance systems capable of recording influential visitors. In her view, these circumstances create credible questions about whether Epstein gathered compromising material and whether intelligence interests played some role in his operation.<br /><br />Brown has been careful not to declare that Epstein was conclusively an agent of Mossad, the CIA or any other organization. Instead, she has argued that the intelligence angle is plausible, supported by enough troubling connections to warrant a serious investigation rather than ridicule or reflexive dismissal. She has also raised the possibility that Epstein’s suspected intelligence value could help explain why he received extraordinary protection, including the secret federal non-prosecution agreement that allowed him to escape far more serious charges in Florida. Brown’s position is ultimately that the available evidence does not prove the intelligence theory, but the unanswered questions surrounding Epstein’s money, surveillance, relationships and preferential treatment make it an avenue investigators and journalists should continue pursuing.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4484</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   Jamie Dimon And The USVI/JP Morgan Epstein Related Lawsuit (6/17/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jamie-dimon-and-the-usvi-jp-morgan-epstein-related-lawsuit-6-17-26--72550673</link><description><![CDATA[Jamie Dimon was pulled directly into the U.S. Virgin Islands’ lawsuit against JPMorgan because he had served as the bank’s chief executive during most of the period when Jeffrey Epstein remained a valued client despite his 2008 conviction and repeated internal warnings about his conduct and financial activity. The Virgin Islands alleged that JPMorgan knowingly benefited from Epstein’s business, ignored red flags and continued supplying the banking infrastructure that helped sustain his trafficking operation. As the bank’s most powerful executive, Dimon was ordered to sit for a deposition about what he knew, when senior management learned of the concerns surrounding Epstein and why the relationship was not terminated until 2013.<br /><br />During his deposition, Dimon said he had never met or spoken with Epstein and did not remember being informed about him while Epstein was a customer. That testimony became a major point of contention because evidence showed that other senior JPMorgan figures—including Jes Staley and Mary Erdoes—were involved in discussions concerning Epstein, while compliance personnel had repeatedly raised concerns. The Virgin Islands unsuccessfully sought to question Dimon a second time after obtaining additional evidence, but his testimony still placed his leadership under intense scrutiny and raised questions about how such a controversial client could remain at the bank without the chief executive knowing. JPMorgan ultimately paid $75 million to settle the Virgin Islands’ claims without admitting liability, in addition to a separate $290 million settlement with Epstein’s victims.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72550673</guid><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 08:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72550673/megajamiedimonexposure.mp3" length="45094496" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/22652fa3-39a9-4951-96bc-b92928b3f0a7/22652fa3-39a9-4951-96bc-b92928b3f0a7.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/22652fa3-39a9-4951-96bc-b92928b3f0a7/22652fa3-39a9-4951-96bc-b92928b3f0a7.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/22652fa3-39a9-4951-96bc-b92928b3f0a7/22652fa3-39a9-4951-96bc-b92928b3f0a7.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jamie Dimon was pulled directly into the U.S. Virgin Islands’ lawsuit against JPMorgan because he had served as the bank’s chief executive during most of the period when Jeffrey Epstein remained a valued client despite his 2008 conviction and repeated...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jamie Dimon was pulled directly into the U.S. Virgin Islands’ lawsuit against JPMorgan because he had served as the bank’s chief executive during most of the period when Jeffrey Epstein remained a valued client despite his 2008 conviction and repeated internal warnings about his conduct and financial activity. The Virgin Islands alleged that JPMorgan knowingly benefited from Epstein’s business, ignored red flags and continued supplying the banking infrastructure that helped sustain his trafficking operation. As the bank’s most powerful executive, Dimon was ordered to sit for a deposition about what he knew, when senior management learned of the concerns surrounding Epstein and why the relationship was not terminated until 2013.<br /><br />During his deposition, Dimon said he had never met or spoken with Epstein and did not remember being informed about him while Epstein was a customer. That testimony became a major point of contention because evidence showed that other senior JPMorgan figures—including Jes Staley and Mary Erdoes—were involved in discussions concerning Epstein, while compliance personnel had repeatedly raised concerns. The Virgin Islands unsuccessfully sought to question Dimon a second time after obtaining additional evidence, but his testimony still placed his leadership under intense scrutiny and raised questions about how such a controversial client could remain at the bank without the chief executive knowing. JPMorgan ultimately paid $75 million to settle the Virgin Islands’ claims without admitting liability, in addition to a separate $290 million settlement with Epstein’s victims.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2819</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The Warden's Statement Detailing The Death Of Jeffrey Epstein (Part 21-24) (6/16/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-warden-s-statement-detailing-the-death-of-jeffrey-epstein-part-21-24-6-16-26--72541668</link><description><![CDATA[Lamine N'Diaye, in his interview with the Office of the Inspector General, essentially tried to turn the Metropolitan Correctional Center into a scapegoat while positioning himself as a bystander to its failures. He leaned heavily on the narrative that the facility was already broken—staff shortages, overtime abuse, infrastructure decay—as if that somehow absolved him of responsibility rather than underscoring the urgency of his role. What stands out is not just what he admitted, but what he avoided: there is little evidence in his account of decisive leadership, no clear record of aggressive intervention, and no meaningful acknowledgment that the buck was supposed to stop with him. Instead, he described a system failing in slow motion while he remained at the helm, fully aware of the cracks but unwilling—or unable—to reinforce them before they gave way.<br /><br />Even more troubling is how his interview reflects a pattern of deflection that mirrors broader institutional behavior in the wake of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. N’Diaye pointed to correctional officers missing rounds, falsifying logs, and working under extreme fatigue, but failed to explain why those conditions were tolerated under his command, especially after Epstein had already been flagged as a high-risk inmate following a prior incident. The responsibility didn’t disappear into the system—it sat squarely in his office, and his testimony reads less like accountability and more like damage control. The overall picture is not of a warden overwhelmed by circumstances, but of a leader who allowed a known crisis environment to persist unchecked, then attempted to retroactively frame it as inevitable once the worst-case scenario unfolded.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00119019.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00119019.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72541668</guid><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 06:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72541668/megawardenoig21n22n23n24.mp3" length="51144873" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/479ca620-fdb0-4ae6-bf3f-6dfc772a4f7d/479ca620-fdb0-4ae6-bf3f-6dfc772a4f7d.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/479ca620-fdb0-4ae6-bf3f-6dfc772a4f7d/479ca620-fdb0-4ae6-bf3f-6dfc772a4f7d.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/479ca620-fdb0-4ae6-bf3f-6dfc772a4f7d/479ca620-fdb0-4ae6-bf3f-6dfc772a4f7d.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Lamine N'Diaye, in his interview with the Office of the Inspector General, essentially tried to turn the Metropolitan Correctional Center into a scapegoat while positioning himself as a bystander to its failures. He leaned heavily on the narrative...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Lamine N'Diaye, in his interview with the Office of the Inspector General, essentially tried to turn the Metropolitan Correctional Center into a scapegoat while positioning himself as a bystander to its failures. He leaned heavily on the narrative that the facility was already broken—staff shortages, overtime abuse, infrastructure decay—as if that somehow absolved him of responsibility rather than underscoring the urgency of his role. What stands out is not just what he admitted, but what he avoided: there is little evidence in his account of decisive leadership, no clear record of aggressive intervention, and no meaningful acknowledgment that the buck was supposed to stop with him. Instead, he described a system failing in slow motion while he remained at the helm, fully aware of the cracks but unwilling—or unable—to reinforce them before they gave way.<br /><br />Even more troubling is how his interview reflects a pattern of deflection that mirrors broader institutional behavior in the wake of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. N’Diaye pointed to correctional officers missing rounds, falsifying logs, and working under extreme fatigue, but failed to explain why those conditions were tolerated under his command, especially after Epstein had already been flagged as a high-risk inmate following a prior incident. The responsibility didn’t disappear into the system—it sat squarely in his office, and his testimony reads less like accountability and more like damage control. The overall picture is not of a warden overwhelmed by circumstances, but of a leader who allowed a known crisis environment to persist unchecked, then attempted to retroactively frame it as inevitable once the worst-case scenario unfolded.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00119019.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00119019.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3197</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Billionaire’s Gatekeeper: How Les Wexner Handed Jeffrey Epstein the Keys to Power  (Part 4)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-billionaire-s-gatekeeper-how-les-wexner-handed-jeffrey-epstein-the-keys-to-power-part-4--72550896</link><description><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein’s relationship with Les Wexner was not just financial—it was the foundation of Epstein’s rise from a mysterious money manager to a figure embedded in the world of extreme wealth and power. Wexner, the billionaire founder of L Brands and longtime CEO of Victoria’s Secret, granted Epstein unprecedented access to his fortune, his homes, and his reputation. Epstein was given power of attorney over Wexner’s finances, a level of trust so unusual it raised questions about the true nature of their bond. This arrangement allowed Epstein to control massive sums of Wexner’s wealth, acquire luxury properties, and build the image of legitimacy he later used to lure victims and cultivate influence..<br /><br />Yet Wexner has long insisted that he, too, was deceived by Epstein, claiming that Epstein stole money and betrayed his trust. That narrative, however, collapses under scrutiny. Maria Farmer’s testimony places abuse at Wexner’s heavily guarded Ohio estate, and Epstein’s use of Wexner’s assets—such as the Manhattan townhouse he effectively gifted him—suggests far more than a duped investor. The fact that Wexner enabled Epstein’s ascent, while escaping the same level of media and legal accountability as other Epstein associates, underscores how wealth and influence insulated him. Their relationship was not incidental; it was the keystone that transformed Epstein from a grifter into a predator with access to the corridors of power.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72550896</guid><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 04:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72550896/wexnerepstein4_1.mp3" length="14331864" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/63712916-faa8-4665-89e6-ef29af87c278/63712916-faa8-4665-89e6-ef29af87c278.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/63712916-faa8-4665-89e6-ef29af87c278/63712916-faa8-4665-89e6-ef29af87c278.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/63712916-faa8-4665-89e6-ef29af87c278/63712916-faa8-4665-89e6-ef29af87c278.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jeffrey Epstein’s relationship with Les Wexner was not just financial—it was the foundation of Epstein’s rise from a mysterious money manager to a figure embedded in the world of extreme wealth and power. Wexner, the billionaire founder of L Brands...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein’s relationship with Les Wexner was not just financial—it was the foundation of Epstein’s rise from a mysterious money manager to a figure embedded in the world of extreme wealth and power. Wexner, the billionaire founder of L Brands and longtime CEO of Victoria’s Secret, granted Epstein unprecedented access to his fortune, his homes, and his reputation. Epstein was given power of attorney over Wexner’s finances, a level of trust so unusual it raised questions about the true nature of their bond. This arrangement allowed Epstein to control massive sums of Wexner’s wealth, acquire luxury properties, and build the image of legitimacy he later used to lure victims and cultivate influence..<br /><br />Yet Wexner has long insisted that he, too, was deceived by Epstein, claiming that Epstein stole money and betrayed his trust. That narrative, however, collapses under scrutiny. Maria Farmer’s testimony places abuse at Wexner’s heavily guarded Ohio estate, and Epstein’s use of Wexner’s assets—such as the Manhattan townhouse he effectively gifted him—suggests far more than a duped investor. The fact that Wexner enabled Epstein’s ascent, while escaping the same level of media and legal accountability as other Epstein associates, underscores how wealth and influence insulated him. Their relationship was not incidental; it was the keystone that transformed Epstein from a grifter into a predator with access to the corridors of power.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>896</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Billionaire’s Gatekeeper: How Les Wexner Handed Jeffrey Epstein the Keys to Power  (Part 3)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-billionaire-s-gatekeeper-how-les-wexner-handed-jeffrey-epstein-the-keys-to-power-part-3--72550893</link><description><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein’s relationship with Les Wexner was not just financial—it was the foundation of Epstein’s rise from a mysterious money manager to a figure embedded in the world of extreme wealth and power. Wexner, the billionaire founder of L Brands and longtime CEO of Victoria’s Secret, granted Epstein unprecedented access to his fortune, his homes, and his reputation. Epstein was given power of attorney over Wexner’s finances, a level of trust so unusual it raised questions about the true nature of their bond. This arrangement allowed Epstein to control massive sums of Wexner’s wealth, acquire luxury properties, and build the image of legitimacy he later used to lure victims and cultivate influence..<br /><br />Yet Wexner has long insisted that he, too, was deceived by Epstein, claiming that Epstein stole money and betrayed his trust. That narrative, however, collapses under scrutiny. Maria Farmer’s testimony places abuse at Wexner’s heavily guarded Ohio estate, and Epstein’s use of Wexner’s assets—such as the Manhattan townhouse he effectively gifted him—suggests far more than a duped investor. The fact that Wexner enabled Epstein’s ascent, while escaping the same level of media and legal accountability as other Epstein associates, underscores how wealth and influence insulated him. Their relationship was not incidental; it was the keystone that transformed Epstein from a grifter into a predator with access to the corridors of power.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72550893</guid><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 02:30:01 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72550893/wexnerepstein3_1.mp3" length="10478698" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a6bf3a0e-5b75-48fe-854a-3d1bf784116c/a6bf3a0e-5b75-48fe-854a-3d1bf784116c.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a6bf3a0e-5b75-48fe-854a-3d1bf784116c/a6bf3a0e-5b75-48fe-854a-3d1bf784116c.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a6bf3a0e-5b75-48fe-854a-3d1bf784116c/a6bf3a0e-5b75-48fe-854a-3d1bf784116c.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jeffrey Epstein’s relationship with Les Wexner was not just financial—it was the foundation of Epstein’s rise from a mysterious money manager to a figure embedded in the world of extreme wealth and power. Wexner, the billionaire founder of L Brands...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein’s relationship with Les Wexner was not just financial—it was the foundation of Epstein’s rise from a mysterious money manager to a figure embedded in the world of extreme wealth and power. Wexner, the billionaire founder of L Brands and longtime CEO of Victoria’s Secret, granted Epstein unprecedented access to his fortune, his homes, and his reputation. Epstein was given power of attorney over Wexner’s finances, a level of trust so unusual it raised questions about the true nature of their bond. This arrangement allowed Epstein to control massive sums of Wexner’s wealth, acquire luxury properties, and build the image of legitimacy he later used to lure victims and cultivate influence..<br /><br />Yet Wexner has long insisted that he, too, was deceived by Epstein, claiming that Epstein stole money and betrayed his trust. That narrative, however, collapses under scrutiny. Maria Farmer’s testimony places abuse at Wexner’s heavily guarded Ohio estate, and Epstein’s use of Wexner’s assets—such as the Manhattan townhouse he effectively gifted him—suggests far more than a duped investor. The fact that Wexner enabled Epstein’s ascent, while escaping the same level of media and legal accountability as other Epstein associates, underscores how wealth and influence insulated him. Their relationship was not incidental; it was the keystone that transformed Epstein from a grifter into a predator with access to the corridors of power.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>655</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Billionaire’s Gatekeeper: How Les Wexner Handed Jeffrey Epstein the Keys to Power (Part 2)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-billionaire-s-gatekeeper-how-les-wexner-handed-jeffrey-epstein-the-keys-to-power-part-2--72550895</link><description><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein’s relationship with Les Wexner was not just financial—it was the foundation of Epstein’s rise from a mysterious money manager to a figure embedded in the world of extreme wealth and power. Wexner, the billionaire founder of L Brands and longtime CEO of Victoria’s Secret, granted Epstein unprecedented access to his fortune, his homes, and his reputation. Epstein was given power of attorney over Wexner’s finances, a level of trust so unusual it raised questions about the true nature of their bond. This arrangement allowed Epstein to control massive sums of Wexner’s wealth, acquire luxury properties, and build the image of legitimacy he later used to lure victims and cultivate influence..<br /><br />Yet Wexner has long insisted that he, too, was deceived by Epstein, claiming that Epstein stole money and betrayed his trust. That narrative, however, collapses under scrutiny. Maria Farmer’s testimony places abuse at Wexner’s heavily guarded Ohio estate, and Epstein’s use of Wexner’s assets—such as the Manhattan townhouse he effectively gifted him—suggests far more than a duped investor. The fact that Wexner enabled Epstein’s ascent, while escaping the same level of media and legal accountability as other Epstein associates, underscores how wealth and influence insulated him. Their relationship was not incidental; it was the keystone that transformed Epstein from a grifter into a predator with access to the corridors of power.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72550895</guid><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72550895/wexnerepstein2_1.mp3" length="11312527" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/25d88099-3d10-4a83-8bac-d5590fd48059/25d88099-3d10-4a83-8bac-d5590fd48059.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/25d88099-3d10-4a83-8bac-d5590fd48059/25d88099-3d10-4a83-8bac-d5590fd48059.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/25d88099-3d10-4a83-8bac-d5590fd48059/25d88099-3d10-4a83-8bac-d5590fd48059.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jeffrey Epstein’s relationship with Les Wexner was not just financial—it was the foundation of Epstein’s rise from a mysterious money manager to a figure embedded in the world of extreme wealth and power. Wexner, the billionaire founder of L Brands...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein’s relationship with Les Wexner was not just financial—it was the foundation of Epstein’s rise from a mysterious money manager to a figure embedded in the world of extreme wealth and power. Wexner, the billionaire founder of L Brands and longtime CEO of Victoria’s Secret, granted Epstein unprecedented access to his fortune, his homes, and his reputation. Epstein was given power of attorney over Wexner’s finances, a level of trust so unusual it raised questions about the true nature of their bond. This arrangement allowed Epstein to control massive sums of Wexner’s wealth, acquire luxury properties, and build the image of legitimacy he later used to lure victims and cultivate influence..<br /><br />Yet Wexner has long insisted that he, too, was deceived by Epstein, claiming that Epstein stole money and betrayed his trust. That narrative, however, collapses under scrutiny. Maria Farmer’s testimony places abuse at Wexner’s heavily guarded Ohio estate, and Epstein’s use of Wexner’s assets—such as the Manhattan townhouse he effectively gifted him—suggests far more than a duped investor. The fact that Wexner enabled Epstein’s ascent, while escaping the same level of media and legal accountability as other Epstein associates, underscores how wealth and influence insulated him. Their relationship was not incidental; it was the keystone that transformed Epstein from a grifter into a predator with access to the corridors of power.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>708</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Billionaire’s Gatekeeper: How Les Wexner Handed Jeffrey Epstein the Keys to Power (Part 1)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-billionaire-s-gatekeeper-how-les-wexner-handed-jeffrey-epstein-the-keys-to-power-part-1--72550894</link><description><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein’s relationship with Les Wexner was not just financial—it was the foundation of Epstein’s rise from a mysterious money manager to a figure embedded in the world of extreme wealth and power. Wexner, the billionaire founder of L Brands and longtime CEO of Victoria’s Secret, granted Epstein unprecedented access to his fortune, his homes, and his reputation. Epstein was given power of attorney over Wexner’s finances, a level of trust so unusual it raised questions about the true nature of their bond. This arrangement allowed Epstein to control massive sums of Wexner’s wealth, acquire luxury properties, and build the image of legitimacy he later used to lure victims and cultivate influence..<br /><br />Yet Wexner has long insisted that he, too, was deceived by Epstein, claiming that Epstein stole money and betrayed his trust. That narrative, however, collapses under scrutiny. Maria Farmer’s testimony places abuse at Wexner’s heavily guarded Ohio estate, and Epstein’s use of Wexner’s assets—such as the Manhattan townhouse he effectively gifted him—suggests far more than a duped investor. The fact that Wexner enabled Epstein’s ascent, while escaping the same level of media and legal accountability as other Epstein associates, underscores how wealth and influence insulated him. Their relationship was not incidental; it was the keystone that transformed Epstein from a grifter into a predator with access to the corridors of power.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72550894</guid><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 22:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72550894/wexnerepstein1_1.mp3" length="13679848" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/45189414-e69b-4e76-94eb-7711b68d392b/45189414-e69b-4e76-94eb-7711b68d392b.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/45189414-e69b-4e76-94eb-7711b68d392b/45189414-e69b-4e76-94eb-7711b68d392b.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/45189414-e69b-4e76-94eb-7711b68d392b/45189414-e69b-4e76-94eb-7711b68d392b.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jeffrey Epstein’s relationship with Les Wexner was not just financial—it was the foundation of Epstein’s rise from a mysterious money manager to a figure embedded in the world of extreme wealth and power. Wexner, the billionaire founder of L Brands...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein’s relationship with Les Wexner was not just financial—it was the foundation of Epstein’s rise from a mysterious money manager to a figure embedded in the world of extreme wealth and power. Wexner, the billionaire founder of L Brands and longtime CEO of Victoria’s Secret, granted Epstein unprecedented access to his fortune, his homes, and his reputation. Epstein was given power of attorney over Wexner’s finances, a level of trust so unusual it raised questions about the true nature of their bond. This arrangement allowed Epstein to control massive sums of Wexner’s wealth, acquire luxury properties, and build the image of legitimacy he later used to lure victims and cultivate influence..<br /><br />Yet Wexner has long insisted that he, too, was deceived by Epstein, claiming that Epstein stole money and betrayed his trust. That narrative, however, collapses under scrutiny. Maria Farmer’s testimony places abuse at Wexner’s heavily guarded Ohio estate, and Epstein’s use of Wexner’s assets—such as the Manhattan townhouse he effectively gifted him—suggests far more than a duped investor. The fact that Wexner enabled Epstein’s ascent, while escaping the same level of media and legal accountability as other Epstein associates, underscores how wealth and influence insulated him. Their relationship was not incidental; it was the keystone that transformed Epstein from a grifter into a predator with access to the corridors of power.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>855</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>breakingnews,dailydiddyreport,diddy,diddydiaries,diddynews,diddynewscentral,diddynewsdaily,diddynewsupdates,diddyontrial,diddytrial,diddytrialnews,diddytrialnewsupdate,diddytrialupdates,news,newsupdate,seancombs,seancombsnews,seandiddycombstrial,thetrialofdiddy,truecrime</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Sarah Kellen Congressional Transcript (Part 11) (6/16/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-sarah-kellen-congressional-transcript-part-11-6-16-26--72542391</link><description><![CDATA[Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein’s operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein’s abuse machine function.<br /><br />The skeptical read is that Kellen’s testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein’s access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein’s criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nPDWYcqxugpod1-b98xuayS-RkUtrcyS/view?pli=1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google Drive</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72542391</guid><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72542391/kellentranscript11.mp3" length="11664448" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4a076141-57c5-449c-868c-a7a1effa73ec/4a076141-57c5-449c-868c-a7a1effa73ec.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4a076141-57c5-449c-868c-a7a1effa73ec/4a076141-57c5-449c-868c-a7a1effa73ec.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4a076141-57c5-449c-868c-a7a1effa73ec/4a076141-57c5-449c-868c-a7a1effa73ec.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein’s operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein’s operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein’s abuse machine function.<br /><br />The skeptical read is that Kellen’s testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein’s access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein’s criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nPDWYcqxugpod1-b98xuayS-RkUtrcyS/view?pli=1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google Drive</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>729</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Sarah Kellen Congressional Transcript (Part 10) (6/15/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-sarah-kellen-congressional-transcript-part-10-6-15-26--72535942</link><description><![CDATA[Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein’s operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein’s abuse machine function.<br /><br />The skeptical read is that Kellen’s testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein’s access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein’s criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nPDWYcqxugpod1-b98xuayS-RkUtrcyS/view?pli=1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google Drive</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72535942</guid><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 18:30:05 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72535942/kellentranscript10.mp3" length="13490512" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6a98ac86-02f8-46af-998d-6bbb254cec03/6a98ac86-02f8-46af-998d-6bbb254cec03.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6a98ac86-02f8-46af-998d-6bbb254cec03/6a98ac86-02f8-46af-998d-6bbb254cec03.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6a98ac86-02f8-46af-998d-6bbb254cec03/6a98ac86-02f8-46af-998d-6bbb254cec03.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein’s operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein’s operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein’s abuse machine function.<br /><br />The skeptical read is that Kellen’s testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein’s access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein’s criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nPDWYcqxugpod1-b98xuayS-RkUtrcyS/view?pli=1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google Drive</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>844</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Queen Elizabeth Accused of Shielding Prince Andrew From the Epstein Fallout (6/16/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/queen-elizabeth-accused-of-shielding-prince-andrew-from-the-epstein-fallout-6-16-26--72542389</link><description><![CDATA[Queen Elizabeth II is accused by unnamed royal sources of repeatedly shielding Prince Andrew and ignoring warnings about his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. The claims center partly on documents indicating that the Queen supported Andrew’s appointment as Britain’s special trade representative in 2000, a position that gave him extensive international access and placed him in contact with wealthy business figures. Critics now argue that the role may have provided Andrew with opportunities to pursue questionable dealings connected to Epstein, including unproven allegations that he benefited financially from business introductions. One unidentified insider goes much further, claiming that the Queen knew about Epstein, the girls and the trafficking but protected Andrew because he was her favorite son. Those allegations remain unverified, and Andrew has consistently denied criminal wrongdoing.<br /><br />The broader suggestion is that the Queen’s loyalty to Andrew may have overridden concerns within the royal family and government about his judgment and conduct. King Charles, then Prince of Wales, was reportedly skeptical of Andrew’s suitability for the trade role, but the appointment moved forward with support from figures including Peter Mandelson. The claims have resurfaced as authorities examine whether Andrew improperly shared confidential trade information with Epstein, placing renewed pressure on the royal family to explain what palace officials knew and when they knew it. However, much of the account relies on anonymous sources, recycled tabloid allegations and unrelated conspiracy theories, meaning the central accusation—that Elizabeth knowingly covered up Andrew’s Epstein connections—has not been established by official findings or tested in court.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/queen-elizabeth-prince-andrew-epstein-scandal-1802556" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Queen Elizabeth Blindly Covered Up Ex-Prince Andrew's Epstein Ties, Royal Insider Claims | IBTimes UK</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72542389</guid><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72542389/queendraggedinepstein.mp3" length="12590646" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cd3bd4f1-0c39-451a-8357-faf1caed63e3/cd3bd4f1-0c39-451a-8357-faf1caed63e3.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cd3bd4f1-0c39-451a-8357-faf1caed63e3/cd3bd4f1-0c39-451a-8357-faf1caed63e3.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cd3bd4f1-0c39-451a-8357-faf1caed63e3/cd3bd4f1-0c39-451a-8357-faf1caed63e3.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Queen Elizabeth II is accused by unnamed royal sources of repeatedly shielding Prince Andrew and ignoring warnings about his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. The claims center partly on documents indicating that the Queen supported Andrew’s...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Queen Elizabeth II is accused by unnamed royal sources of repeatedly shielding Prince Andrew and ignoring warnings about his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. The claims center partly on documents indicating that the Queen supported Andrew’s appointment as Britain’s special trade representative in 2000, a position that gave him extensive international access and placed him in contact with wealthy business figures. Critics now argue that the role may have provided Andrew with opportunities to pursue questionable dealings connected to Epstein, including unproven allegations that he benefited financially from business introductions. One unidentified insider goes much further, claiming that the Queen knew about Epstein, the girls and the trafficking but protected Andrew because he was her favorite son. Those allegations remain unverified, and Andrew has consistently denied criminal wrongdoing.<br /><br />The broader suggestion is that the Queen’s loyalty to Andrew may have overridden concerns within the royal family and government about his judgment and conduct. King Charles, then Prince of Wales, was reportedly skeptical of Andrew’s suitability for the trade role, but the appointment moved forward with support from figures including Peter Mandelson. The claims have resurfaced as authorities examine whether Andrew improperly shared confidential trade information with Epstein, placing renewed pressure on the royal family to explain what palace officials knew and when they knew it. However, much of the account relies on anonymous sources, recycled tabloid allegations and unrelated conspiracy theories, meaning the central accusation—that Elizabeth knowingly covered up Andrew’s Epstein connections—has not been established by official findings or tested in court.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/queen-elizabeth-prince-andrew-epstein-scandal-1802556" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Queen Elizabeth Blindly Covered Up Ex-Prince Andrew's Epstein Ties, Royal Insider Claims | IBTimes UK</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>787</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Lesley Groff And Her 302 Proffer Statement To The FBI (6/16/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/lesley-groff-and-her-302-proffer-statement-to-the-fbi-6-16-26--72542387</link><description><![CDATA[Lesley Groff’s FBI 302/proffer presents her as the person who helped run Jeffrey Epstein’s daily machinery from the New York side: his calendar, calls, travel, meetings, errands, office flow, and massage scheduling. She said she began working for Epstein in February 2001 after being recruited for a job that was described as “organizing one man’s life,” and she described a hectic, high-pressure office where Epstein gave her lists of calls, meetings, appointments, and people to manage. The document places her inside the operational center of Epstein’s world, alongside lawyers, accountants, assistants, traders, Ghislaine Maxwell, and other staffers, with Groff functioning as a key gatekeeper for Epstein’s schedule and communications. After Epstein’s July 2019 arrest, FBI and SDNY records show investigators focused on potential co-conspirators, specifically including Maxwell and Groff, and met with Groff and her attorneys for a reverse proffer on July 18, 2019.<br /><br /><br />The central tension in the 302 is that Groff admitted to the administrative role—booking massages, handling travel, moving messages, and managing access—but denied knowing that Epstein’s “massages” were sexual abuse or that any girls involved were underage. Through her lawyer, she maintained that she had little or no direct interaction with the women, believed references to “class” or “school” meant college, and viewed Epstein as strange or eccentric rather than criminal. That denial sits uneasily against the government’s own framing of the investigation, which described Epstein’s employees and associates as helping arrange encounters with victims, and against later reporting that victims identified Groff as someone who scheduled massages, arranged travel, or handled logistics connected to abuse. In plain terms, the 302 shows Groff trying to draw a hard line between “I ran Epstein’s life” and “I knew what Epstein was doing,” while the broader investigative record shows why federal agents were not treating her as just a normal secretary.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01246216.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA01246216.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72542387</guid><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 15:06:43 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72542387/groff302.mp3" length="20713265" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6a82284d-e8cd-4354-89ed-0897f211d836/6a82284d-e8cd-4354-89ed-0897f211d836.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6a82284d-e8cd-4354-89ed-0897f211d836/6a82284d-e8cd-4354-89ed-0897f211d836.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6a82284d-e8cd-4354-89ed-0897f211d836/6a82284d-e8cd-4354-89ed-0897f211d836.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Lesley Groff’s FBI 302/proffer presents her as the person who helped run Jeffrey Epstein’s daily machinery from the New York side: his calendar, calls, travel, meetings, errands, office flow, and massage scheduling. She said she began working for...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Lesley Groff’s FBI 302/proffer presents her as the person who helped run Jeffrey Epstein’s daily machinery from the New York side: his calendar, calls, travel, meetings, errands, office flow, and massage scheduling. She said she began working for Epstein in February 2001 after being recruited for a job that was described as “organizing one man’s life,” and she described a hectic, high-pressure office where Epstein gave her lists of calls, meetings, appointments, and people to manage. The document places her inside the operational center of Epstein’s world, alongside lawyers, accountants, assistants, traders, Ghislaine Maxwell, and other staffers, with Groff functioning as a key gatekeeper for Epstein’s schedule and communications. After Epstein’s July 2019 arrest, FBI and SDNY records show investigators focused on potential co-conspirators, specifically including Maxwell and Groff, and met with Groff and her attorneys for a reverse proffer on July 18, 2019.<br /><br /><br />The central tension in the 302 is that Groff admitted to the administrative role—booking massages, handling travel, moving messages, and managing access—but denied knowing that Epstein’s “massages” were sexual abuse or that any girls involved were underage. Through her lawyer, she maintained that she had little or no direct interaction with the women, believed references to “class” or “school” meant college, and viewed Epstein as strange or eccentric rather than criminal. That denial sits uneasily against the government’s own framing of the investigation, which described Epstein’s employees and associates as helping arrange encounters with victims, and against later reporting that victims identified Groff as someone who scheduled massages, arranged travel, or handled logistics connected to abuse. In plain terms, the 302 shows Groff trying to draw a hard line between “I ran Epstein’s life” and “I knew what Epstein was doing,” while the broader investigative record shows why federal agents were not treating her as just a normal secretary.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01246216.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA01246216.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1295</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Melinda French Gates Says Epstein "Radiated Evil" (6/16/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/melinda-french-gates-says-epstein-radiated-evil-6-16-26--72542388</link><description><![CDATA[Melinda French Gates became visibly emotional while recalling her only meeting with Jeffrey Epstein, which took place at his Manhattan townhouse in 2013 with her then-husband, Bill Gates. She said her heart began racing as she remembered the encounter and described having an immediate, visceral sense that Epstein was evil. French Gates said she regretted entering the home almost immediately and suffered nightmares afterward, arguing that people—especially women—should trust their instincts when someone makes them feel profoundly unsafe. She called Epstein an abhorrent and horrifying man and said the experience remained difficult for her to discuss more than a decade later.<br /><br />French Gates also reiterated that Bill Gates’ continued association with Epstein contributed to the collapse of their marriage. Her comments came shortly after Gates testified to Congress that Epstein had learned about his extramarital affairs and unsuccessfully attempted to use that information as leverage to keep him engaged. French Gates declined to answer for her former husband or others involved, saying those questions belong to them, while directing attention back toward the girls and young women Epstein abused. She said the survivors deserved peace, justice and a full accounting of how Epstein was allowed to operate for so long despite.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://nypost.com/2026/06/13/us-news/melinda-french-gates-breaks-down-recalling-evil-epstein-encounter-that-gave-her-nightmares/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Melinda French Gates breaks down recalling 'evil' Epstein encounter that gave her nightmares</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72542388</guid><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72542388/melindagatesnewinterview.mp3" length="10987355" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/92a149b2-2e29-4dc2-9383-63ec27700dad/92a149b2-2e29-4dc2-9383-63ec27700dad.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/92a149b2-2e29-4dc2-9383-63ec27700dad/92a149b2-2e29-4dc2-9383-63ec27700dad.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/92a149b2-2e29-4dc2-9383-63ec27700dad/92a149b2-2e29-4dc2-9383-63ec27700dad.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Melinda French Gates became visibly emotional while recalling her only meeting with Jeffrey Epstein, which took place at his Manhattan townhouse in 2013 with her then-husband, Bill Gates. She said her heart began racing as she remembered the encounter...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Melinda French Gates became visibly emotional while recalling her only meeting with Jeffrey Epstein, which took place at his Manhattan townhouse in 2013 with her then-husband, Bill Gates. She said her heart began racing as she remembered the encounter and described having an immediate, visceral sense that Epstein was evil. French Gates said she regretted entering the home almost immediately and suffered nightmares afterward, arguing that people—especially women—should trust their instincts when someone makes them feel profoundly unsafe. She called Epstein an abhorrent and horrifying man and said the experience remained difficult for her to discuss more than a decade later.<br /><br />French Gates also reiterated that Bill Gates’ continued association with Epstein contributed to the collapse of their marriage. Her comments came shortly after Gates testified to Congress that Epstein had learned about his extramarital affairs and unsuccessfully attempted to use that information as leverage to keep him engaged. French Gates declined to answer for her former husband or others involved, saying those questions belong to them, while directing attention back toward the girls and young women Epstein abused. She said the survivors deserved peace, justice and a full accounting of how Epstein was allowed to operate for so long despite.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://nypost.com/2026/06/13/us-news/melinda-french-gates-breaks-down-recalling-evil-epstein-encounter-that-gave-her-nightmares/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Melinda French Gates breaks down recalling 'evil' Epstein encounter that gave her nightmares</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>687</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The Warden's Statement Detailing The Death Of Jeffrey Epstein (Part 17-20) (6/15/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-warden-s-statement-detailing-the-death-of-jeffrey-epstein-part-17-20-6-15-26--72541667</link><description><![CDATA[Lamine N'Diaye, in his interview with the Office of the Inspector General, essentially tried to turn the Metropolitan Correctional Center into a scapegoat while positioning himself as a bystander to its failures. He leaned heavily on the narrative that the facility was already broken—staff shortages, overtime abuse, infrastructure decay—as if that somehow absolved him of responsibility rather than underscoring the urgency of his role. What stands out is not just what he admitted, but what he avoided: there is little evidence in his account of decisive leadership, no clear record of aggressive intervention, and no meaningful acknowledgment that the buck was supposed to stop with him. Instead, he described a system failing in slow motion while he remained at the helm, fully aware of the cracks but unwilling—or unable—to reinforce them before they gave way.<br /><br />Even more troubling is how his interview reflects a pattern of deflection that mirrors broader institutional behavior in the wake of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. N’Diaye pointed to correctional officers missing rounds, falsifying logs, and working under extreme fatigue, but failed to explain why those conditions were tolerated under his command, especially after Epstein had already been flagged as a high-risk inmate following a prior incident. The responsibility didn’t disappear into the system—it sat squarely in his office, and his testimony reads less like accountability and more like damage control. The overall picture is not of a warden overwhelmed by circumstances, but of a leader who allowed a known crisis environment to persist unchecked, then attempted to retroactively frame it as inevitable once the worst-case scenario unfolded.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00119019.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00119019.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72541667</guid><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72541667/megawardenoig17n18n19n20.mp3" length="56555355" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/15b44a79-23a9-4901-9dfd-fa1a60dbb3d1/15b44a79-23a9-4901-9dfd-fa1a60dbb3d1.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/15b44a79-23a9-4901-9dfd-fa1a60dbb3d1/15b44a79-23a9-4901-9dfd-fa1a60dbb3d1.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/15b44a79-23a9-4901-9dfd-fa1a60dbb3d1/15b44a79-23a9-4901-9dfd-fa1a60dbb3d1.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Lamine N'Diaye, in his interview with the Office of the Inspector General, essentially tried to turn the Metropolitan Correctional Center into a scapegoat while positioning himself as a bystander to its failures. He leaned heavily on the narrative...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Lamine N'Diaye, in his interview with the Office of the Inspector General, essentially tried to turn the Metropolitan Correctional Center into a scapegoat while positioning himself as a bystander to its failures. He leaned heavily on the narrative that the facility was already broken—staff shortages, overtime abuse, infrastructure decay—as if that somehow absolved him of responsibility rather than underscoring the urgency of his role. What stands out is not just what he admitted, but what he avoided: there is little evidence in his account of decisive leadership, no clear record of aggressive intervention, and no meaningful acknowledgment that the buck was supposed to stop with him. Instead, he described a system failing in slow motion while he remained at the helm, fully aware of the cracks but unwilling—or unable—to reinforce them before they gave way.<br /><br />Even more troubling is how his interview reflects a pattern of deflection that mirrors broader institutional behavior in the wake of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. N’Diaye pointed to correctional officers missing rounds, falsifying logs, and working under extreme fatigue, but failed to explain why those conditions were tolerated under his command, especially after Epstein had already been flagged as a high-risk inmate following a prior incident. The responsibility didn’t disappear into the system—it sat squarely in his office, and his testimony reads less like accountability and more like damage control. The overall picture is not of a warden overwhelmed by circumstances, but of a leader who allowed a known crisis environment to persist unchecked, then attempted to retroactively frame it as inevitable once the worst-case scenario unfolded.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00119019.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00119019.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3535</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The Warden's Statement Detailing The Death Of Jeffrey Epstein (Part 14-16) (6/15/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-warden-s-statement-detailing-the-death-of-jeffrey-epstein-part-14-16-6-15-26--72541666</link><description><![CDATA[Lamine N'Diaye, in his interview with the Office of the Inspector General, essentially tried to turn the Metropolitan Correctional Center into a scapegoat while positioning himself as a bystander to its failures. He leaned heavily on the narrative that the facility was already broken—staff shortages, overtime abuse, infrastructure decay—as if that somehow absolved him of responsibility rather than underscoring the urgency of his role. What stands out is not just what he admitted, but what he avoided: there is little evidence in his account of decisive leadership, no clear record of aggressive intervention, and no meaningful acknowledgment that the buck was supposed to stop with him. Instead, he described a system failing in slow motion while he remained at the helm, fully aware of the cracks but unwilling—or unable—to reinforce them before they gave way.<br /><br />Even more troubling is how his interview reflects a pattern of deflection that mirrors broader institutional behavior in the wake of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. N’Diaye pointed to correctional officers missing rounds, falsifying logs, and working under extreme fatigue, but failed to explain why those conditions were tolerated under his command, especially after Epstein had already been flagged as a high-risk inmate following a prior incident. The responsibility didn’t disappear into the system—it sat squarely in his office, and his testimony reads less like accountability and more like damage control. The overall picture is not of a warden overwhelmed by circumstances, but of a leader who allowed a known crisis environment to persist unchecked, then attempted to retroactively frame it as inevitable once the worst-case scenario unfolded.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00119019.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00119019.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72541666</guid><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72541666/megawardenoig14n15n16.mp3" length="40340210" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/261997f9-83e4-4122-a86c-c621aa0b5c79/261997f9-83e4-4122-a86c-c621aa0b5c79.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/261997f9-83e4-4122-a86c-c621aa0b5c79/261997f9-83e4-4122-a86c-c621aa0b5c79.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/261997f9-83e4-4122-a86c-c621aa0b5c79/261997f9-83e4-4122-a86c-c621aa0b5c79.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Lamine N'Diaye, in his interview with the Office of the Inspector General, essentially tried to turn the Metropolitan Correctional Center into a scapegoat while positioning himself as a bystander to its failures. He leaned heavily on the narrative...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Lamine N'Diaye, in his interview with the Office of the Inspector General, essentially tried to turn the Metropolitan Correctional Center into a scapegoat while positioning himself as a bystander to its failures. He leaned heavily on the narrative that the facility was already broken—staff shortages, overtime abuse, infrastructure decay—as if that somehow absolved him of responsibility rather than underscoring the urgency of his role. What stands out is not just what he admitted, but what he avoided: there is little evidence in his account of decisive leadership, no clear record of aggressive intervention, and no meaningful acknowledgment that the buck was supposed to stop with him. Instead, he described a system failing in slow motion while he remained at the helm, fully aware of the cracks but unwilling—or unable—to reinforce them before they gave way.<br /><br />Even more troubling is how his interview reflects a pattern of deflection that mirrors broader institutional behavior in the wake of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. N’Diaye pointed to correctional officers missing rounds, falsifying logs, and working under extreme fatigue, but failed to explain why those conditions were tolerated under his command, especially after Epstein had already been flagged as a high-risk inmate following a prior incident. The responsibility didn’t disappear into the system—it sat squarely in his office, and his testimony reads less like accountability and more like damage control. The overall picture is not of a warden overwhelmed by circumstances, but of a leader who allowed a known crisis environment to persist unchecked, then attempted to retroactively frame it as inevitable once the worst-case scenario unfolded.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00119019.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00119019.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2522</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The Warden's Statement Detailing The Death Of Jeffrey Epstein (Part 11-13) (6/15/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-warden-s-statement-detailing-the-death-of-jeffrey-epstein-part-11-13-6-15-26--72541678</link><description><![CDATA[Lamine N'Diaye, in his interview with the Office of the Inspector General, essentially tried to turn the Metropolitan Correctional Center into a scapegoat while positioning himself as a bystander to its failures. He leaned heavily on the narrative that the facility was already broken—staff shortages, overtime abuse, infrastructure decay—as if that somehow absolved him of responsibility rather than underscoring the urgency of his role. What stands out is not just what he admitted, but what he avoided: there is little evidence in his account of decisive leadership, no clear record of aggressive intervention, and no meaningful acknowledgment that the buck was supposed to stop with him. Instead, he described a system failing in slow motion while he remained at the helm, fully aware of the cracks but unwilling—or unable—to reinforce them before they gave way.<br /><br />Even more troubling is how his interview reflects a pattern of deflection that mirrors broader institutional behavior in the wake of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. N’Diaye pointed to correctional officers missing rounds, falsifying logs, and working under extreme fatigue, but failed to explain why those conditions were tolerated under his command, especially after Epstein had already been flagged as a high-risk inmate following a prior incident. The responsibility didn’t disappear into the system—it sat squarely in his office, and his testimony reads less like accountability and more like damage control. The overall picture is not of a warden overwhelmed by circumstances, but of a leader who allowed a known crisis environment to persist unchecked, then attempted to retroactively frame it as inevitable once the worst-case scenario unfolded.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00119019.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00119019.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72541678</guid><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72541678/megawardenoig11n12n13.mp3" length="41876628" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/131104db-96c5-447c-ae30-d48f8a17bf2c/131104db-96c5-447c-ae30-d48f8a17bf2c.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/131104db-96c5-447c-ae30-d48f8a17bf2c/131104db-96c5-447c-ae30-d48f8a17bf2c.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/131104db-96c5-447c-ae30-d48f8a17bf2c/131104db-96c5-447c-ae30-d48f8a17bf2c.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Lamine N'Diaye, in his interview with the Office of the Inspector General, essentially tried to turn the Metropolitan Correctional Center into a scapegoat while positioning himself as a bystander to its failures. He leaned heavily on the narrative...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Lamine N'Diaye, in his interview with the Office of the Inspector General, essentially tried to turn the Metropolitan Correctional Center into a scapegoat while positioning himself as a bystander to its failures. He leaned heavily on the narrative that the facility was already broken—staff shortages, overtime abuse, infrastructure decay—as if that somehow absolved him of responsibility rather than underscoring the urgency of his role. What stands out is not just what he admitted, but what he avoided: there is little evidence in his account of decisive leadership, no clear record of aggressive intervention, and no meaningful acknowledgment that the buck was supposed to stop with him. Instead, he described a system failing in slow motion while he remained at the helm, fully aware of the cracks but unwilling—or unable—to reinforce them before they gave way.<br /><br />Even more troubling is how his interview reflects a pattern of deflection that mirrors broader institutional behavior in the wake of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. N’Diaye pointed to correctional officers missing rounds, falsifying logs, and working under extreme fatigue, but failed to explain why those conditions were tolerated under his command, especially after Epstein had already been flagged as a high-risk inmate following a prior incident. The responsibility didn’t disappear into the system—it sat squarely in his office, and his testimony reads less like accountability and more like damage control. The overall picture is not of a warden overwhelmed by circumstances, but of a leader who allowed a known crisis environment to persist unchecked, then attempted to retroactively frame it as inevitable once the worst-case scenario unfolded.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00119019.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00119019.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2618</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Police Expand Investigation Into  Andrew’s Alleged Role in Epstein’s Trafficking Network</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/police-expand-investigation-into-andrew-s-alleged-role-in-epstein-s-trafficking-network--72324210</link><description><![CDATA[The developments center on renewed police scrutiny of sexual misconduct allegations connected to Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein, with authorities reviewing both historical claims and newly surfaced material. Investigators are reassessing evidence linked to Epstein’s trafficking network, including accounts from multiple women who allege inappropriate conduct during encounters tied to Epstein’s properties and social circle. These claims are being examined alongside previously known accusations, such as those brought by Virginia Giuffre, which were settled civilly without any admission of guilt.<br /><br />At the same time, the investigation appears to be widening in scope, with police not only revisiting sexual allegations but also examining broader questions about Andrew’s conduct and associations during his relationship with Epstein. This includes whether individuals in his orbit, including security personnel or others connected to his movements, may have witnessed or overlooked potential wrongdoing. While no new charges have been confirmed and Andrew continues to deny all allegations, the ongoing inquiry reflects increasing pressure on authorities to fully explore both past accusations and any new evidence emerging from recently released Epstein-related files.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15660227/Police-sexual-allegations-Andrew-Jeffrey-Epstein.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Met Police is probing 'whole range of sexual allegations' against Andrew, chief confirms - and says Peter Mandelson is being investigated over €500billion bailout email he sent Jeffrey Epstein | Daily Mail Online</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72324210</guid><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72324210/policeexpandinvestigationandy.mp3" length="11081813" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f4851612-17a4-4713-9ddc-80cc120f5158/f4851612-17a4-4713-9ddc-80cc120f5158.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f4851612-17a4-4713-9ddc-80cc120f5158/f4851612-17a4-4713-9ddc-80cc120f5158.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f4851612-17a4-4713-9ddc-80cc120f5158/f4851612-17a4-4713-9ddc-80cc120f5158.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The developments center on renewed police scrutiny of sexual misconduct allegations connected to Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein, with authorities reviewing both historical claims and newly surfaced material. Investigators are reassessing evidence...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The developments center on renewed police scrutiny of sexual misconduct allegations connected to Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein, with authorities reviewing both historical claims and newly surfaced material. Investigators are reassessing evidence linked to Epstein’s trafficking network, including accounts from multiple women who allege inappropriate conduct during encounters tied to Epstein’s properties and social circle. These claims are being examined alongside previously known accusations, such as those brought by Virginia Giuffre, which were settled civilly without any admission of guilt.<br /><br />At the same time, the investigation appears to be widening in scope, with police not only revisiting sexual allegations but also examining broader questions about Andrew’s conduct and associations during his relationship with Epstein. This includes whether individuals in his orbit, including security personnel or others connected to his movements, may have witnessed or overlooked potential wrongdoing. While no new charges have been confirmed and Andrew continues to deny all allegations, the ongoing inquiry reflects increasing pressure on authorities to fully explore both past accusations and any new evidence emerging from recently released Epstein-related files.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15660227/Police-sexual-allegations-Andrew-Jeffrey-Epstein.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Met Police is probing 'whole range of sexual allegations' against Andrew, chief confirms - and says Peter Mandelson is being investigated over €500billion bailout email he sent Jeffrey Epstein | Daily Mail Online</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>693</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>More  Context On The Lawsuit Filed By The Epstein Survivors Against The USVI</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/more-context-on-the-lawsuit-filed-by-the-epstein-survivors-against-the-usvi--72502503</link><description><![CDATA[The lawsuit filed by Epstein’s survivors against the U.S. Virgin Islands and its political leadership was a direct attempt to hold the government itself accountable for what the plaintiffs describe as years of willful blindness, facilitation, and corruption that allowed Epstein’s trafficking operation to flourish openly on USVI soil. In the complaint, survivors allege that senior Virgin Islands officials knew Epstein was sexually abusing and trafficking underage girls at Little St. James and related properties, yet continued to provide him with extraordinary protections. According to the suit, those protections included favorable tax treatment, lax regulatory oversight, assistance with immigration and travel issues, and a general refusal to investigate credible reports of abuse. The survivors frame the USVI not as a passive bystander, but as an active enabler whose officials allegedly chose Epstein’s money and political influence over the safety of children.<br /><br />In context, the lawsuit is significant because it shifts the focus away from Epstein as a lone criminal and squarely onto the governmental systems that, according to the plaintiffs, made his crimes possible for decades. The survivors argue that Epstein’s operation could not have functioned at the scale it did without institutional cooperation or deliberate neglect, particularly in a small jurisdiction where his activities were widely known. By naming politicians and government entities, the suit seeks to pierce the long-standing narrative that Epstein merely “slipped through the cracks,” instead asserting that the cracks were deliberately widened for him. The case is as much about exposing how power protects itself as it is about compensation, positioning the USVI as a test case for whether governments can be held civilly liable for enabling large-scale sexual exploitation through corruption, indifference, and abuse of authority.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72502503</guid><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 02:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72502503/morecontextusvisurvivorlawsuit.mp3" length="22053242" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/85e40388-7331-48c6-8026-55bbc0ad63be/85e40388-7331-48c6-8026-55bbc0ad63be.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/85e40388-7331-48c6-8026-55bbc0ad63be/85e40388-7331-48c6-8026-55bbc0ad63be.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/85e40388-7331-48c6-8026-55bbc0ad63be/85e40388-7331-48c6-8026-55bbc0ad63be.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The lawsuit filed by Epstein’s survivors against the U.S. Virgin Islands and its political leadership was a direct attempt to hold the government itself accountable for what the plaintiffs describe as years of willful blindness, facilitation, and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The lawsuit filed by Epstein’s survivors against the U.S. Virgin Islands and its political leadership was a direct attempt to hold the government itself accountable for what the plaintiffs describe as years of willful blindness, facilitation, and corruption that allowed Epstein’s trafficking operation to flourish openly on USVI soil. In the complaint, survivors allege that senior Virgin Islands officials knew Epstein was sexually abusing and trafficking underage girls at Little St. James and related properties, yet continued to provide him with extraordinary protections. According to the suit, those protections included favorable tax treatment, lax regulatory oversight, assistance with immigration and travel issues, and a general refusal to investigate credible reports of abuse. The survivors frame the USVI not as a passive bystander, but as an active enabler whose officials allegedly chose Epstein’s money and political influence over the safety of children.<br /><br />In context, the lawsuit is significant because it shifts the focus away from Epstein as a lone criminal and squarely onto the governmental systems that, according to the plaintiffs, made his crimes possible for decades. The survivors argue that Epstein’s operation could not have functioned at the scale it did without institutional cooperation or deliberate neglect, particularly in a small jurisdiction where his activities were widely known. By naming politicians and government entities, the suit seeks to pierce the long-standing narrative that Epstein merely “slipped through the cracks,” instead asserting that the cracks were deliberately widened for him. The case is as much about exposing how power protects itself as it is about compensation, positioning the USVI as a test case for whether governments can be held civilly liable for enabling large-scale sexual exploitation through corruption, indifference, and abuse of authority.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1379</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Jane Doe And Her Lawsuit Against Leon Black</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/jane-doe-and-her-lawsuit-against-leon-black--72502499</link><description><![CDATA[In July 2023, a woman identified as "Jane Doe" filed a federal lawsuit in the Southern District of New York against billionaire investor Leon Black, alleging that he raped her in 2002 at Jeffrey Epstein's Manhattan townhouse. The complaint details that Doe, who was 16 years old at the time and had autism and mosaic Down syndrome, was trafficked by Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. She claims Epstein introduced her to Black, instructing her to provide him with a massage that would involve sexual intercourse. <br /><br /><a href="https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/49707043/Doe_v_Black?utm_source=chatgpt.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"></a>Black has denied these allegations, with his attorney describing the lawsuit as "frivolous and sanctionable." In September 2024, U.S. District Judge Jessica G.L. Clarke denied Black's motion to dismiss the case, allowing the lawsuit to proceed. <br />Sources<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.602764/gov.uscourts.nysd.602764.152.0.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">gov.uscourts.nysd.602764.152.0.pdf</a><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72502499</guid><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72502499/janedoeleonblacklawsuit.mp3" length="35944115" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7312c119-8c75-40fa-a439-18d4ad7cdb61/7312c119-8c75-40fa-a439-18d4ad7cdb61.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7312c119-8c75-40fa-a439-18d4ad7cdb61/7312c119-8c75-40fa-a439-18d4ad7cdb61.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7312c119-8c75-40fa-a439-18d4ad7cdb61/7312c119-8c75-40fa-a439-18d4ad7cdb61.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In July 2023, a woman identified as "Jane Doe" filed a federal lawsuit in the Southern District of New York against billionaire investor Leon Black, alleging that he raped her in 2002 at Jeffrey Epstein's Manhattan townhouse. The complaint details...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In July 2023, a woman identified as "Jane Doe" filed a federal lawsuit in the Southern District of New York against billionaire investor Leon Black, alleging that he raped her in 2002 at Jeffrey Epstein's Manhattan townhouse. The complaint details that Doe, who was 16 years old at the time and had autism and mosaic Down syndrome, was trafficked by Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. She claims Epstein introduced her to Black, instructing her to provide him with a massage that would involve sexual intercourse. <br /><br /><a href="https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/49707043/Doe_v_Black?utm_source=chatgpt.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"></a>Black has denied these allegations, with his attorney describing the lawsuit as "frivolous and sanctionable." In September 2024, U.S. District Judge Jessica G.L. Clarke denied Black's motion to dismiss the case, allowing the lawsuit to proceed. <br />Sources<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.602764/gov.uscourts.nysd.602764.152.0.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">gov.uscourts.nysd.602764.152.0.pdf</a><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2247</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Hacker Penetrates FBI System Containing Epstein Investigation Records</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/hacker-penetrates-fbi-system-containing-epstein-investigation-records--72324196</link><description><![CDATA[A cybersecurity breach exposed files connected to the FBI’s investigation of Jeffrey Epstein after a hacker gained unauthorized access to a server at the FBI’s New York Field Office in February 2023. The intrusion occurred at the bureau’s Child Exploitation Forensic Lab when a server used to handle digital evidence was accidentally left vulnerable by an FBI special agent navigating internal procedures for managing forensic data. According to information reviewed from Justice Department documents and sources familiar with the incident, the hacker was able to access files tied to the Epstein investigation. The breach reportedly came to light after the intruder left a message on the compromised system, alerting investigators that someone had accessed the server. The FBI later described the event as an isolated cyber incident, saying access was quickly cut off and the affected network secured while an internal investigation continued.<br /><br />The identity and nationality of the hacker remain unknown, though officials believe the breach was likely carried out by an independent cybercriminal rather than a foreign government intelligence service. Sources familiar with the incident said the hacker appeared unaware that the system belonged to a law enforcement agency and reportedly reacted with disgust after encountering child exploitation evidence on the device. The intruder allegedly left a note threatening to report the material to authorities before the FBI eventually secured the system. While it remains unclear exactly which Epstein-related files were accessed or whether any data was downloaded, the incident highlights the potential intelligence value of the Epstein case files, which contain sensitive information about the financier’s activities and connections.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://cybernews.com/news/epstein-files-foreign-hacker-fbi/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein files compromised by foreign hacker who breached FBI – Reuters | Cybernews</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72324196</guid><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72324196/fbiepsteinfileshacked.mp3" length="13336285" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/873dff74-1aba-434a-99df-a476a9749001/873dff74-1aba-434a-99df-a476a9749001.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/873dff74-1aba-434a-99df-a476a9749001/873dff74-1aba-434a-99df-a476a9749001.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/873dff74-1aba-434a-99df-a476a9749001/873dff74-1aba-434a-99df-a476a9749001.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A cybersecurity breach exposed files connected to the FBI’s investigation of Jeffrey Epstein after a hacker gained unauthorized access to a server at the FBI’s New York Field Office in February 2023. The intrusion occurred at the bureau’s Child...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A cybersecurity breach exposed files connected to the FBI’s investigation of Jeffrey Epstein after a hacker gained unauthorized access to a server at the FBI’s New York Field Office in February 2023. The intrusion occurred at the bureau’s Child Exploitation Forensic Lab when a server used to handle digital evidence was accidentally left vulnerable by an FBI special agent navigating internal procedures for managing forensic data. According to information reviewed from Justice Department documents and sources familiar with the incident, the hacker was able to access files tied to the Epstein investigation. The breach reportedly came to light after the intruder left a message on the compromised system, alerting investigators that someone had accessed the server. The FBI later described the event as an isolated cyber incident, saying access was quickly cut off and the affected network secured while an internal investigation continued.<br /><br />The identity and nationality of the hacker remain unknown, though officials believe the breach was likely carried out by an independent cybercriminal rather than a foreign government intelligence service. Sources familiar with the incident said the hacker appeared unaware that the system belonged to a law enforcement agency and reportedly reacted with disgust after encountering child exploitation evidence on the device. The intruder allegedly left a note threatening to report the material to authorities before the FBI eventually secured the system. While it remains unclear exactly which Epstein-related files were accessed or whether any data was downloaded, the incident highlights the potential intelligence value of the Epstein case files, which contain sensitive information about the financier’s activities and connections.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://cybernews.com/news/epstein-files-foreign-hacker-fbi/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein files compromised by foreign hacker who breached FBI – Reuters | Cybernews</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>834</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Sarah Kellen Congressional Transcript (Part 9) (6/15/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-sarah-kellen-congressional-transcript-part-9-6-15-26--72535941</link><description><![CDATA[Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein’s operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein’s abuse machine function.<br /><br />The skeptical read is that Kellen’s testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein’s access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein’s criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nPDWYcqxugpod1-b98xuayS-RkUtrcyS/view?pli=1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google Drive</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72535941</guid><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72535941/kellentranscript9.mp3" length="14524543" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9b2b93e8-8bfb-4994-a7a4-bdc3a945f0ce/9b2b93e8-8bfb-4994-a7a4-bdc3a945f0ce.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9b2b93e8-8bfb-4994-a7a4-bdc3a945f0ce/9b2b93e8-8bfb-4994-a7a4-bdc3a945f0ce.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9b2b93e8-8bfb-4994-a7a4-bdc3a945f0ce/9b2b93e8-8bfb-4994-a7a4-bdc3a945f0ce.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein’s operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein’s operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein’s abuse machine function.<br /><br />The skeptical read is that Kellen’s testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein’s access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein’s criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nPDWYcqxugpod1-b98xuayS-RkUtrcyS/view?pli=1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google Drive</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>908</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>19 Epstein Survivors Oppose The Todd Blanche Nomination For Attorney General (6/15/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/19-epstein-survivors-oppose-the-todd-blanche-nomination-for-attorney-general-6-15-26--72532873</link><description><![CDATA[Nineteen Jeffrey Epstein survivors publicly opposed Todd Blanche’s nomination to become permanent attorney general, arguing that his role in the administration’s handling of the Epstein files showed a failure of transparency and accountability. Their statement came after reporting that Blanche and other senior officials participated in Situation Room meetings focused on managing the political fallout from the Epstein records controversy. The survivors said they were alarmed that top officials appeared to treat the matter as a reputational problem instead of an opportunity to investigate what happened, protect survivors, and give the public a full accounting.<br /><br />The group specifically criticized Blanche for overseeing the release of Epstein-related files while serious questions remained about redactions, withheld documents, and the exposure of survivors’ personal information. Former Attorney General Pam Bondi has also tried to distance herself from the controversy, telling lawmakers that Blanche was responsible for the process. Blanche’s nomination now faces added pressure as House Oversight Chair James Comer has said he plans to subpoena him for testimony in July, while survivors continue pushing Congress to put witnesses under oath and force a clearer record of how the DOJ handled the Epstein and Maxwell files.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/11/politics/epstein-survivors-blanche-nomination" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Group of Epstein survivors announce opposition to Todd Blanche’s attorney general nomination | CNN Politics</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72532873</guid><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 18:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72532873/survivorsblanche.mp3" length="16341412" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/23984d4d-5317-4773-a83d-d3210db6b749/23984d4d-5317-4773-a83d-d3210db6b749.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/23984d4d-5317-4773-a83d-d3210db6b749/23984d4d-5317-4773-a83d-d3210db6b749.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/23984d4d-5317-4773-a83d-d3210db6b749/23984d4d-5317-4773-a83d-d3210db6b749.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Nineteen Jeffrey Epstein survivors publicly opposed Todd Blanche’s nomination to become permanent attorney general, arguing that his role in the administration’s handling of the Epstein files showed a failure of transparency and accountability. Their...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Nineteen Jeffrey Epstein survivors publicly opposed Todd Blanche’s nomination to become permanent attorney general, arguing that his role in the administration’s handling of the Epstein files showed a failure of transparency and accountability. Their statement came after reporting that Blanche and other senior officials participated in Situation Room meetings focused on managing the political fallout from the Epstein records controversy. The survivors said they were alarmed that top officials appeared to treat the matter as a reputational problem instead of an opportunity to investigate what happened, protect survivors, and give the public a full accounting.<br /><br />The group specifically criticized Blanche for overseeing the release of Epstein-related files while serious questions remained about redactions, withheld documents, and the exposure of survivors’ personal information. Former Attorney General Pam Bondi has also tried to distance herself from the controversy, telling lawmakers that Blanche was responsible for the process. Blanche’s nomination now faces added pressure as House Oversight Chair James Comer has said he plans to subpoena him for testimony in July, while survivors continue pushing Congress to put witnesses under oath and force a clearer record of how the DOJ handled the Epstein and Maxwell files.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/11/politics/epstein-survivors-blanche-nomination" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Group of Epstein survivors announce opposition to Todd Blanche’s attorney general nomination | CNN Politics</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1022</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Democrats Demand Answers on Ghislaine Maxwell Prison Transfer (6/15/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/democrats-demand-answers-on-ghislaine-maxwell-prison-transfer-6-15-26--72532871</link><description><![CDATA[House Democrats are demanding answers from the Justice Department and Bureau of Prisons over Ghislaine Maxwell’s transfer from FCI Tallahassee to the minimum-security Federal Prison Camp Bryan after her closed-door interview with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche. Led by Rep. Jamie Raskin, Democrats argue the move raises serious questions because Maxwell is serving a 20-year sentence for her role in Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking operation, and sex offenders are generally not expected to receive this kind of lower-security placement. They are asking DOJ and BOP officials to explain who approved the transfer, what policies were applied or bypassed, and whether Maxwell received treatment unavailable to ordinary prisoners.<br /><br />The demand is part of a broader suspicion that Maxwell may have been given unusually favorable treatment after speaking with Blanche, especially as Congress was seeking her testimony and as Epstein survivors continue pushing for transparency. Democrats have also requested records and communications tied to the transfer, along with any transcript or recording of Maxwell’s DOJ interview, arguing that the timing creates the appearance of a possible political accommodation or effort to influence her cooperation. DOJ has acknowledged receiving the inquiry but has not publicly provided the full explanation Democrats are seeking.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.ms.now/news/democrats-demand-answers-doj-prison-policy-ghislaine-maxwell" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Democrats demand answers over DOJ’s prison policy change tied to Ghislaine Maxwell</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72532871</guid><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72532871/demsquestionblanchemaxwelltransfer.mp3" length="11088501" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c30ff8c8-5b25-415b-8c3c-6fc4c84db2f9/c30ff8c8-5b25-415b-8c3c-6fc4c84db2f9.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c30ff8c8-5b25-415b-8c3c-6fc4c84db2f9/c30ff8c8-5b25-415b-8c3c-6fc4c84db2f9.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c30ff8c8-5b25-415b-8c3c-6fc4c84db2f9/c30ff8c8-5b25-415b-8c3c-6fc4c84db2f9.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>House Democrats are demanding answers from the Justice Department and Bureau of Prisons over Ghislaine Maxwell’s transfer from FCI Tallahassee to the minimum-security Federal Prison Camp Bryan after her closed-door interview with Deputy Attorney...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[House Democrats are demanding answers from the Justice Department and Bureau of Prisons over Ghislaine Maxwell’s transfer from FCI Tallahassee to the minimum-security Federal Prison Camp Bryan after her closed-door interview with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche. Led by Rep. Jamie Raskin, Democrats argue the move raises serious questions because Maxwell is serving a 20-year sentence for her role in Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking operation, and sex offenders are generally not expected to receive this kind of lower-security placement. They are asking DOJ and BOP officials to explain who approved the transfer, what policies were applied or bypassed, and whether Maxwell received treatment unavailable to ordinary prisoners.<br /><br />The demand is part of a broader suspicion that Maxwell may have been given unusually favorable treatment after speaking with Blanche, especially as Congress was seeking her testimony and as Epstein survivors continue pushing for transparency. Democrats have also requested records and communications tied to the transfer, along with any transcript or recording of Maxwell’s DOJ interview, arguing that the timing creates the appearance of a possible political accommodation or effort to influence her cooperation. DOJ has acknowledged receiving the inquiry but has not publicly provided the full explanation Democrats are seeking.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.ms.now/news/democrats-demand-answers-doj-prison-policy-ghislaine-maxwell" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Democrats demand answers over DOJ’s prison policy change tied to Ghislaine Maxwell</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>694</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>House Epstein Probe Moves Toward Alan Dershowitz (6/15/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/house-epstein-probe-moves-toward-alan-dershowitz-6-15-26--72532872</link><description><![CDATA[House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer said the panel will seek testimony from Alan Dershowitz as part of its investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, a move Comer tied directly to Lesley Groff’s closed-door testimony and a subsequent meeting with Epstein survivors. Groff, Epstein’s longtime assistant, reportedly named Dershowitz when asked who else the committee should interview, while survivors also urged lawmakers to bring him in. Her full transcript has not yet been released, but in her opening statement she denied knowledge of Epstein’s crimes and described him as a manipulative deceiver.<br /><br /><br />Dershowitz, who was part of Epstein’s legal team during the negotiations that produced the controversial 2008 plea deal, said he had already volunteered to testify and welcomed the chance to speak to the committee. He again denied wrongdoing connected to Epstein, including Virginia Giuffre’s past allegations against him, which he has long rejected and for which he was never criminally charged. Dershowitz said he wanted “the truth to come out,” defended his work in the Epstein matter, and downplayed any relationship with Groff, saying he barely knew her beyond seeing her at Epstein’s office and possibly having travel arranged through her.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/10/alan-dershowitz-epstein-house-panel" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">House panel to seek testimony from Alan Dershowitz about Jeffrey Epstein | Jeffrey Epstein | The Guardian</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72532872</guid><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72532872/dershowitztotestify.mp3" length="11518581" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e0bb22cc-42a4-4bf3-975c-990ef873166d/e0bb22cc-42a4-4bf3-975c-990ef873166d.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e0bb22cc-42a4-4bf3-975c-990ef873166d/e0bb22cc-42a4-4bf3-975c-990ef873166d.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e0bb22cc-42a4-4bf3-975c-990ef873166d/e0bb22cc-42a4-4bf3-975c-990ef873166d.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer said the panel will seek testimony from Alan Dershowitz as part of its investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, a move Comer tied directly to Lesley Groff’s closed-door testimony and a subsequent meeting with...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer said the panel will seek testimony from Alan Dershowitz as part of its investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, a move Comer tied directly to Lesley Groff’s closed-door testimony and a subsequent meeting with Epstein survivors. Groff, Epstein’s longtime assistant, reportedly named Dershowitz when asked who else the committee should interview, while survivors also urged lawmakers to bring him in. Her full transcript has not yet been released, but in her opening statement she denied knowledge of Epstein’s crimes and described him as a manipulative deceiver.<br /><br /><br />Dershowitz, who was part of Epstein’s legal team during the negotiations that produced the controversial 2008 plea deal, said he had already volunteered to testify and welcomed the chance to speak to the committee. He again denied wrongdoing connected to Epstein, including Virginia Giuffre’s past allegations against him, which he has long rejected and for which he was never criminally charged. Dershowitz said he wanted “the truth to come out,” defended his work in the Epstein matter, and downplayed any relationship with Groff, saying he barely knew her beyond seeing her at Epstein’s office and possibly having travel arranged through her.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/10/alan-dershowitz-epstein-house-panel" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">House panel to seek testimony from Alan Dershowitz about Jeffrey Epstein | Jeffrey Epstein | The Guardian</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>720</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The Warden's Statement Detailing The Death Of Jeffrey Epstein (Part 1-4) (6/14/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-warden-s-statement-detailing-the-death-of-jeffrey-epstein-part-1-4-6-14-26--72523393</link><description><![CDATA[Lamine N'Diaye, in his interview with the Office of the Inspector General, essentially tried to turn the Metropolitan Correctional Center into a scapegoat while positioning himself as a bystander to its failures. He leaned heavily on the narrative that the facility was already broken—staff shortages, overtime abuse, infrastructure decay—as if that somehow absolved him of responsibility rather than underscoring the urgency of his role. What stands out is not just what he admitted, but what he avoided: there is little evidence in his account of decisive leadership, no clear record of aggressive intervention, and no meaningful acknowledgment that the buck was supposed to stop with him. Instead, he described a system failing in slow motion while he remained at the helm, fully aware of the cracks but unwilling—or unable—to reinforce them before they gave way.<br /><br />Even more troubling is how his interview reflects a pattern of deflection that mirrors broader institutional behavior in the wake of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. N’Diaye pointed to correctional officers missing rounds, falsifying logs, and working under extreme fatigue, but failed to explain why those conditions were tolerated under his command, especially after Epstein had already been flagged as a high-risk inmate following a prior incident. The responsibility didn’t disappear into the system—it sat squarely in his office, and his testimony reads less like accountability and more like damage control. The overall picture is not of a warden overwhelmed by circumstances, but of a leader who allowed a known crisis environment to persist unchecked, then attempted to retroactively frame it as inevitable once the worst-case scenario unfolded.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00119019.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00119019.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72523393</guid><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 14:12:39 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72523393/megawardenoig1n2n3n4.mp3" length="47746029" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/116eae4a-76f0-4fa8-a41d-b5d2d9c54bbe/116eae4a-76f0-4fa8-a41d-b5d2d9c54bbe.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/116eae4a-76f0-4fa8-a41d-b5d2d9c54bbe/116eae4a-76f0-4fa8-a41d-b5d2d9c54bbe.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/116eae4a-76f0-4fa8-a41d-b5d2d9c54bbe/116eae4a-76f0-4fa8-a41d-b5d2d9c54bbe.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Lamine N'Diaye, in his interview with the Office of the Inspector General, essentially tried to turn the Metropolitan Correctional Center into a scapegoat while positioning himself as a bystander to its failures. He leaned heavily on the narrative...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Lamine N'Diaye, in his interview with the Office of the Inspector General, essentially tried to turn the Metropolitan Correctional Center into a scapegoat while positioning himself as a bystander to its failures. He leaned heavily on the narrative that the facility was already broken—staff shortages, overtime abuse, infrastructure decay—as if that somehow absolved him of responsibility rather than underscoring the urgency of his role. What stands out is not just what he admitted, but what he avoided: there is little evidence in his account of decisive leadership, no clear record of aggressive intervention, and no meaningful acknowledgment that the buck was supposed to stop with him. Instead, he described a system failing in slow motion while he remained at the helm, fully aware of the cracks but unwilling—or unable—to reinforce them before they gave way.<br /><br />Even more troubling is how his interview reflects a pattern of deflection that mirrors broader institutional behavior in the wake of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. N’Diaye pointed to correctional officers missing rounds, falsifying logs, and working under extreme fatigue, but failed to explain why those conditions were tolerated under his command, especially after Epstein had already been flagged as a high-risk inmate following a prior incident. The responsibility didn’t disappear into the system—it sat squarely in his office, and his testimony reads less like accountability and more like damage control. The overall picture is not of a warden overwhelmed by circumstances, but of a leader who allowed a known crisis environment to persist unchecked, then attempted to retroactively frame it as inevitable once the worst-case scenario unfolded.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00119019.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00119019.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2985</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The Warden's Statement Detailing The Death Of Jeffrey Epstein (Part 8-10) (6/15/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-warden-s-statement-detailing-the-death-of-jeffrey-epstein-part-8-10-6-15-26--72523395</link><description><![CDATA[Lamine N'Diaye, in his interview with the Office of the Inspector General, essentially tried to turn the Metropolitan Correctional Center into a scapegoat while positioning himself as a bystander to its failures. He leaned heavily on the narrative that the facility was already broken—staff shortages, overtime abuse, infrastructure decay—as if that somehow absolved him of responsibility rather than underscoring the urgency of his role. What stands out is not just what he admitted, but what he avoided: there is little evidence in his account of decisive leadership, no clear record of aggressive intervention, and no meaningful acknowledgment that the buck was supposed to stop with him. Instead, he described a system failing in slow motion while he remained at the helm, fully aware of the cracks but unwilling—or unable—to reinforce them before they gave way.<br /><br />Even more troubling is how his interview reflects a pattern of deflection that mirrors broader institutional behavior in the wake of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. N’Diaye pointed to correctional officers missing rounds, falsifying logs, and working under extreme fatigue, but failed to explain why those conditions were tolerated under his command, especially after Epstein had already been flagged as a high-risk inmate following a prior incident. The responsibility didn’t disappear into the system—it sat squarely in his office, and his testimony reads less like accountability and more like damage control. The overall picture is not of a warden overwhelmed by circumstances, but of a leader who allowed a known crisis environment to persist unchecked, then attempted to retroactively frame it as inevitable once the worst-case scenario unfolded.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00119019.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00119019.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72523395</guid><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72523395/megawardenoig8n9n10.mp3" length="42496879" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3e494347-8a88-47b0-8413-4472b21f683f/3e494347-8a88-47b0-8413-4472b21f683f.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3e494347-8a88-47b0-8413-4472b21f683f/3e494347-8a88-47b0-8413-4472b21f683f.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3e494347-8a88-47b0-8413-4472b21f683f/3e494347-8a88-47b0-8413-4472b21f683f.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Lamine N'Diaye, in his interview with the Office of the Inspector General, essentially tried to turn the Metropolitan Correctional Center into a scapegoat while positioning himself as a bystander to its failures. He leaned heavily on the narrative...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Lamine N'Diaye, in his interview with the Office of the Inspector General, essentially tried to turn the Metropolitan Correctional Center into a scapegoat while positioning himself as a bystander to its failures. He leaned heavily on the narrative that the facility was already broken—staff shortages, overtime abuse, infrastructure decay—as if that somehow absolved him of responsibility rather than underscoring the urgency of his role. What stands out is not just what he admitted, but what he avoided: there is little evidence in his account of decisive leadership, no clear record of aggressive intervention, and no meaningful acknowledgment that the buck was supposed to stop with him. Instead, he described a system failing in slow motion while he remained at the helm, fully aware of the cracks but unwilling—or unable—to reinforce them before they gave way.<br /><br />Even more troubling is how his interview reflects a pattern of deflection that mirrors broader institutional behavior in the wake of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. N’Diaye pointed to correctional officers missing rounds, falsifying logs, and working under extreme fatigue, but failed to explain why those conditions were tolerated under his command, especially after Epstein had already been flagged as a high-risk inmate following a prior incident. The responsibility didn’t disappear into the system—it sat squarely in his office, and his testimony reads less like accountability and more like damage control. The overall picture is not of a warden overwhelmed by circumstances, but of a leader who allowed a known crisis environment to persist unchecked, then attempted to retroactively frame it as inevitable once the worst-case scenario unfolded.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00119019.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00119019.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2657</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The Warden's Statement Detailing The Death Of Jeffrey Epstein (Part 5-7) (6/15/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-warden-s-statement-detailing-the-death-of-jeffrey-epstein-part-5-7-6-15-26--72523394</link><description><![CDATA[Lamine N'Diaye, in his interview with the Office of the Inspector General, essentially tried to turn the Metropolitan Correctional Center into a scapegoat while positioning himself as a bystander to its failures. He leaned heavily on the narrative that the facility was already broken—staff shortages, overtime abuse, infrastructure decay—as if that somehow absolved him of responsibility rather than underscoring the urgency of his role. What stands out is not just what he admitted, but what he avoided: there is little evidence in his account of decisive leadership, no clear record of aggressive intervention, and no meaningful acknowledgment that the buck was supposed to stop with him. Instead, he described a system failing in slow motion while he remained at the helm, fully aware of the cracks but unwilling—or unable—to reinforce them before they gave way.<br /><br />Even more troubling is how his interview reflects a pattern of deflection that mirrors broader institutional behavior in the wake of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. N’Diaye pointed to correctional officers missing rounds, falsifying logs, and working under extreme fatigue, but failed to explain why those conditions were tolerated under his command, especially after Epstein had already been flagged as a high-risk inmate following a prior incident. The responsibility didn’t disappear into the system—it sat squarely in his office, and his testimony reads less like accountability and more like damage control. The overall picture is not of a warden overwhelmed by circumstances, but of a leader who allowed a known crisis environment to persist unchecked, then attempted to retroactively frame it as inevitable once the worst-case scenario unfolded.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00119019.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00119019.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72523394</guid><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72523394/megawardenoig5n6n7.mp3" length="42962068" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/06ec0047-336b-488e-ab06-318b51072ed6/06ec0047-336b-488e-ab06-318b51072ed6.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/06ec0047-336b-488e-ab06-318b51072ed6/06ec0047-336b-488e-ab06-318b51072ed6.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/06ec0047-336b-488e-ab06-318b51072ed6/06ec0047-336b-488e-ab06-318b51072ed6.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Lamine N'Diaye, in his interview with the Office of the Inspector General, essentially tried to turn the Metropolitan Correctional Center into a scapegoat while positioning himself as a bystander to its failures. He leaned heavily on the narrative...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Lamine N'Diaye, in his interview with the Office of the Inspector General, essentially tried to turn the Metropolitan Correctional Center into a scapegoat while positioning himself as a bystander to its failures. He leaned heavily on the narrative that the facility was already broken—staff shortages, overtime abuse, infrastructure decay—as if that somehow absolved him of responsibility rather than underscoring the urgency of his role. What stands out is not just what he admitted, but what he avoided: there is little evidence in his account of decisive leadership, no clear record of aggressive intervention, and no meaningful acknowledgment that the buck was supposed to stop with him. Instead, he described a system failing in slow motion while he remained at the helm, fully aware of the cracks but unwilling—or unable—to reinforce them before they gave way.<br /><br />Even more troubling is how his interview reflects a pattern of deflection that mirrors broader institutional behavior in the wake of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. N’Diaye pointed to correctional officers missing rounds, falsifying logs, and working under extreme fatigue, but failed to explain why those conditions were tolerated under his command, especially after Epstein had already been flagged as a high-risk inmate following a prior incident. The responsibility didn’t disappear into the system—it sat squarely in his office, and his testimony reads less like accountability and more like damage control. The overall picture is not of a warden overwhelmed by circumstances, but of a leader who allowed a known crisis environment to persist unchecked, then attempted to retroactively frame it as inevitable once the worst-case scenario unfolded.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00119019.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00119019.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2686</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Judicial Watch And The Epstein Related FOIA</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/judicial-watch-and-the-epstein-related-foia--72502497</link><description><![CDATA[Judicial Watch’s Epstein-related lawsuit is primarily a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) action filed against the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) in late 2025, seeking the release of government records related to accused sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein that the group says have been improperly withheld from the public. The suit, Judicial Watch Inc. v. U.S. Department of Justice (No. 1:25-cv-04123), demands all documents that were subpoenaed by the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, including what was provided in response and communications about that response, after the DOJ failed to adequately respond to an August 2025 FOIA request. The records sought include internal DOJ materials and communications with federal officials about the subpoena and the broader Epstein investigation — material that Judicial Watch argues the public has a right to see given the high-profile nature of the case and longstanding questions about transparency.<br /><br />In addition to the DOJ FOIA suit, Judicial Watch has filed related FOIA lawsuits seeking Epstein-related records from other federal agencies. These include a FOIA lawsuit against the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) for any records concerning Epstein’s possible involvement with intelligence activities, his business dealings and travel, his contacts with influential figures, and documentation about his death, after the CIA failed to respond to a July 2025 FOIA request. Judicial Watch has also pursued DOJ and FBI records on the identities of Epstein’s clients or associates and records provided to the FBI by accuser Virginia Giuffre. Through these cases, the group aims to compel the release of materials that could illuminate undisclosed aspects of the Epstein investigation and potentially government handling of related evidence.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72502497</guid><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 04:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72502497/judicialwatchepsteinsuit.mp3" length="12983110" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e0d46807-1f26-46fd-8bd4-b92e1d750332/e0d46807-1f26-46fd-8bd4-b92e1d750332.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e0d46807-1f26-46fd-8bd4-b92e1d750332/e0d46807-1f26-46fd-8bd4-b92e1d750332.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e0d46807-1f26-46fd-8bd4-b92e1d750332/e0d46807-1f26-46fd-8bd4-b92e1d750332.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Judicial Watch’s Epstein-related lawsuit is primarily a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) action filed against the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) in late 2025, seeking the release of government records related to accused sex trafficker Jeffrey...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Judicial Watch’s Epstein-related lawsuit is primarily a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) action filed against the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) in late 2025, seeking the release of government records related to accused sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein that the group says have been improperly withheld from the public. The suit, Judicial Watch Inc. v. U.S. Department of Justice (No. 1:25-cv-04123), demands all documents that were subpoenaed by the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, including what was provided in response and communications about that response, after the DOJ failed to adequately respond to an August 2025 FOIA request. The records sought include internal DOJ materials and communications with federal officials about the subpoena and the broader Epstein investigation — material that Judicial Watch argues the public has a right to see given the high-profile nature of the case and longstanding questions about transparency.<br /><br />In addition to the DOJ FOIA suit, Judicial Watch has filed related FOIA lawsuits seeking Epstein-related records from other federal agencies. These include a FOIA lawsuit against the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) for any records concerning Epstein’s possible involvement with intelligence activities, his business dealings and travel, his contacts with influential figures, and documentation about his death, after the CIA failed to respond to a July 2025 FOIA request. Judicial Watch has also pursued DOJ and FBI records on the identities of Epstein’s clients or associates and records provided to the FBI by accuser Virginia Giuffre. Through these cases, the group aims to compel the release of materials that could illuminate undisclosed aspects of the Epstein investigation and potentially government handling of related evidence.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>812</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Ever Expanding Scope Of The USVI'S Epstein Related CICO Suit</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-ever-expanding-scope-of-the-usvi-s-epstein-related-cico-suit--72502498</link><description><![CDATA[In pursuing civil enforcement under the Virgin Islands’ Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (CICO), former U.S. Virgin Islands Attorney General Denise George didn’t just target Jeffrey Epstein’s estate and his immediate corporate structures — she cast a far wider net that reached into major financial institutions she believed enabled and obscured his criminal enterprise. After securing a blockbuster $105 million settlement with Epstein’s estate and co-defendants for human trafficking, child exploitation, fraud, and corrupt use of tax incentives, her office issued subpoenas to multiple banks, including JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank, and Citibank, seeking detailed account records, wire transfers, and communications related to Epstein’s myriad corporations, trusts, and financial vehicles. These subpoenas were intended to trace how funds moved through Epstein’s networks and whether banks knowingly facilitated or failed to flag suspicious activity tied to his sex-trafficking scheme.<br /><br /><br />George then took the extraordinary step of filing a federal lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase, accusing the bank of “knowingly facilitati[ng], sustain[ing], and conceal[ing]” Epstein’s human trafficking operations and alleging it financially benefitted from maintaining and managing his accounts over years. The complaint portrayed JPMorgan as indispensable to Epstein’s ability to pay recruiters and victims, maintain secrecy, and profit from his criminal enterprise — claims that expanded the legal exposure beyond individuals directly implicated in abuse to the financial systems that kept Epstein’s operation solvent. Although Deutsche Bank was not named as a defendant in George’s suit, the broader investigative push signaled an effort to hold major financial players accountable for oversight failures or complicity in facilitating one of the most notorious trafficking networks in recent history.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72502498</guid><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72502498/everexpandingscope.mp3" length="17004295" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7ea9b9e1-39f2-474f-966a-dc2eb57b16dd/7ea9b9e1-39f2-474f-966a-dc2eb57b16dd.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7ea9b9e1-39f2-474f-966a-dc2eb57b16dd/7ea9b9e1-39f2-474f-966a-dc2eb57b16dd.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7ea9b9e1-39f2-474f-966a-dc2eb57b16dd/7ea9b9e1-39f2-474f-966a-dc2eb57b16dd.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In pursuing civil enforcement under the Virgin Islands’ Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (CICO), former U.S. Virgin Islands Attorney General Denise George didn’t just target Jeffrey Epstein’s estate and his immediate corporate...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In pursuing civil enforcement under the Virgin Islands’ Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (CICO), former U.S. Virgin Islands Attorney General Denise George didn’t just target Jeffrey Epstein’s estate and his immediate corporate structures — she cast a far wider net that reached into major financial institutions she believed enabled and obscured his criminal enterprise. After securing a blockbuster $105 million settlement with Epstein’s estate and co-defendants for human trafficking, child exploitation, fraud, and corrupt use of tax incentives, her office issued subpoenas to multiple banks, including JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank, and Citibank, seeking detailed account records, wire transfers, and communications related to Epstein’s myriad corporations, trusts, and financial vehicles. These subpoenas were intended to trace how funds moved through Epstein’s networks and whether banks knowingly facilitated or failed to flag suspicious activity tied to his sex-trafficking scheme.<br /><br /><br />George then took the extraordinary step of filing a federal lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase, accusing the bank of “knowingly facilitati[ng], sustain[ing], and conceal[ing]” Epstein’s human trafficking operations and alleging it financially benefitted from maintaining and managing his accounts over years. The complaint portrayed JPMorgan as indispensable to Epstein’s ability to pay recruiters and victims, maintain secrecy, and profit from his criminal enterprise — claims that expanded the legal exposure beyond individuals directly implicated in abuse to the financial systems that kept Epstein’s operation solvent. Although Deutsche Bank was not named as a defendant in George’s suit, the broader investigative push signaled an effort to hold major financial players accountable for oversight failures or complicity in facilitating one of the most notorious trafficking networks in recent history.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1063</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Rumors Swirl Of The Prince Andrew Lawsuit</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/rumors-swirl-of-the-prince-andrew-lawsuit--72502502</link><description><![CDATA[According to a report by the Dailymail, we might be seeing a new lawsuit filed by Virginia Roberts against Prince Andrew over the allegations of his role in her abuse.<br /><br />Looking back, it seems their information was correct as Virginia did in fact, go ahead with her lawsuit. In this episode we take a look at the smoke, before the fire. <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />To contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />Source:<br /><br />https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9872595/Virginia-Roberts-sue-Prince-Andrew-New-York-court.html<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72502502</guid><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72502502/rumorsswirllawsuit.mp3" length="21997653" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a24ae71a-b4c6-45aa-a83d-9a99740141d3/a24ae71a-b4c6-45aa-a83d-9a99740141d3.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a24ae71a-b4c6-45aa-a83d-9a99740141d3/a24ae71a-b4c6-45aa-a83d-9a99740141d3.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a24ae71a-b4c6-45aa-a83d-9a99740141d3/a24ae71a-b4c6-45aa-a83d-9a99740141d3.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>According to a report by the Dailymail, we might be seeing a new lawsuit filed by Virginia Roberts against Prince Andrew over the allegations of his role in her abuse.

Looking back, it seems their information was correct as Virginia did in fact, go...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[According to a report by the Dailymail, we might be seeing a new lawsuit filed by Virginia Roberts against Prince Andrew over the allegations of his role in her abuse.<br /><br />Looking back, it seems their information was correct as Virginia did in fact, go ahead with her lawsuit. In this episode we take a look at the smoke, before the fire. <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />To contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />Source:<br /><br />https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9872595/Virginia-Roberts-sue-Prince-Andrew-New-York-court.html<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1375</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Insane Amount Of Money David Boies Was Making Per Hour</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-insane-amount-of-money-david-boies-was-making-per-hour--72502501</link><description><![CDATA[David Boies is a prominent American attorney known for his high-profile legal cases and involvement in various significant legal matters. Here is a summary of David Boies:<br /><ol><li>Background: David Boies was born on March 11, 1941, in Sycamore, Illinois, USA. He earned his law degree from Yale Law School in 1966 and began his legal career as an associate at Cravath, Swaine &amp; Moore LLP.</li><li>Legal Career: Boies gained national recognition for his exceptional legal skills and became a partner at Cravath. He later founded his own law firm, Boies, Schiller &amp; Flexner LLP, which became renowned for handling complex and contentious legal cases.</li><li>Notable Cases: Boies has been involved in several high-profile cases throughout his career, including:<ul><li>United States v. Microsoft: He represented the U.S. Department of Justice in the antitrust case against Microsoft in the late 1990s.</li><li>Bush v. Gore: Boies represented Vice President Al Gore in the legal dispute over the 2000 U.S. presidential election results, arguing against George W. Bush's election as president.</li><li>Hollingsworth v. Perry: Boies was part of the legal team challenging California's Proposition 8, which banned same-sex marriage. The case ultimately led to the legalization of same-sex marriage in California.</li><li>Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.: Boies represented Apple in the high-stakes patent infringement lawsuit against Samsung.</li></ul></li><li>Advocacy for Civil Rights: Boies has been a vocal advocate for civil rights, particularly in the areas of marriage equality and LGBTQ+ rights. His work on the Proposition 8 case and other related matters has made a significant impact on the legal landscape.</li><li>Awards and Recognition: Boies has received numerous awards and honors for his legal career, including being named one of Time magazine's 100 most influential people in the world in 2010.</li><li>Books: He co-authored a book titled "Courting Justice: From New York Yankees v. Major League Baseball to Bush v. Gore, 1997-2000," which provides insights into his experiences in the legal field.</li></ol><br />We are now learning that David Boies charges over 2100 dollars an hour for his services and those services ended up costing the survivors close to 25 million dollars of the settlement. His cut was roughly 30%.<br /><br />(commercial at 7:13)<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.reuters.com/legal/legalindustry/david-boies-reveals-2110-billing-rate-deutsche-bank-fee-bid-2023-09-18/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">David Boies reveals $2,110 billing rate in Deutsche Bank fee bid | Reuters</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72502501</guid><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72502501/howmuchboiesdeutschebank.mp3" length="10647972" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/910bc794-cae2-4826-b70c-272592c76933/910bc794-cae2-4826-b70c-272592c76933.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/910bc794-cae2-4826-b70c-272592c76933/910bc794-cae2-4826-b70c-272592c76933.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/910bc794-cae2-4826-b70c-272592c76933/910bc794-cae2-4826-b70c-272592c76933.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>David Boies is a prominent American attorney known for his high-profile legal cases and involvement in various significant legal matters. Here is a summary of David Boies:

- Background: David Boies was born on March 11, 1941, in Sycamore, Illinois,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[David Boies is a prominent American attorney known for his high-profile legal cases and involvement in various significant legal matters. Here is a summary of David Boies:<br /><ol><li>Background: David Boies was born on March 11, 1941, in Sycamore, Illinois, USA. He earned his law degree from Yale Law School in 1966 and began his legal career as an associate at Cravath, Swaine &amp; Moore LLP.</li><li>Legal Career: Boies gained national recognition for his exceptional legal skills and became a partner at Cravath. He later founded his own law firm, Boies, Schiller &amp; Flexner LLP, which became renowned for handling complex and contentious legal cases.</li><li>Notable Cases: Boies has been involved in several high-profile cases throughout his career, including:<ul><li>United States v. Microsoft: He represented the U.S. Department of Justice in the antitrust case against Microsoft in the late 1990s.</li><li>Bush v. Gore: Boies represented Vice President Al Gore in the legal dispute over the 2000 U.S. presidential election results, arguing against George W. Bush's election as president.</li><li>Hollingsworth v. Perry: Boies was part of the legal team challenging California's Proposition 8, which banned same-sex marriage. The case ultimately led to the legalization of same-sex marriage in California.</li><li>Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.: Boies represented Apple in the high-stakes patent infringement lawsuit against Samsung.</li></ul></li><li>Advocacy for Civil Rights: Boies has been a vocal advocate for civil rights, particularly in the areas of marriage equality and LGBTQ+ rights. His work on the Proposition 8 case and other related matters has made a significant impact on the legal landscape.</li><li>Awards and Recognition: Boies has received numerous awards and honors for his legal career, including being named one of Time magazine's 100 most influential people in the world in 2010.</li><li>Books: He co-authored a book titled "Courting Justice: From New York Yankees v. Major League Baseball to Bush v. Gore, 1997-2000," which provides insights into his experiences in the legal field.</li></ol><br />We are now learning that David Boies charges over 2100 dollars an hour for his services and those services ended up costing the survivors close to 25 million dollars of the settlement. His cut was roughly 30%.<br /><br />(commercial at 7:13)<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.reuters.com/legal/legalindustry/david-boies-reveals-2110-billing-rate-deutsche-bank-fee-bid-2023-09-18/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">David Boies reveals $2,110 billing rate in Deutsche Bank fee bid | Reuters</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>666</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Sarah Kellen Congressional Transcript (Part 8) (6/14/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-sarah-kellen-congressional-transcript-part-8-6-14-26--72523548</link><description><![CDATA[Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein’s operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein’s abuse machine function.<br /><br />The skeptical read is that Kellen’s testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein’s access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein’s criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nPDWYcqxugpod1-b98xuayS-RkUtrcyS/view?pli=1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google Drive</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72523548</guid><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72523548/kellentranscript8.mp3" length="11126535" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/00cf7845-5520-4a02-9a28-277b33221d70/00cf7845-5520-4a02-9a28-277b33221d70.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/00cf7845-5520-4a02-9a28-277b33221d70/00cf7845-5520-4a02-9a28-277b33221d70.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/00cf7845-5520-4a02-9a28-277b33221d70/00cf7845-5520-4a02-9a28-277b33221d70.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein’s operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein’s operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein’s abuse machine function.<br /><br />The skeptical read is that Kellen’s testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein’s access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein’s criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nPDWYcqxugpod1-b98xuayS-RkUtrcyS/view?pli=1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google Drive</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>696</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Sarah Kellen Congressional Transcript (Part 7) (6/14/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-sarah-kellen-congressional-transcript-part-7-6-14-26--72523546</link><description><![CDATA[Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein’s operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein’s abuse machine function.<br /><br />The skeptical read is that Kellen’s testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein’s access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein’s criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nPDWYcqxugpod1-b98xuayS-RkUtrcyS/view?pli=1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google Drive</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72523546</guid><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 18:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72523546/kellentranscript7.mp3" length="11624742" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/db96ca57-2b29-4523-a12f-15b533d1e247/db96ca57-2b29-4523-a12f-15b533d1e247.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/db96ca57-2b29-4523-a12f-15b533d1e247/db96ca57-2b29-4523-a12f-15b533d1e247.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/db96ca57-2b29-4523-a12f-15b533d1e247/db96ca57-2b29-4523-a12f-15b533d1e247.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein’s operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein’s operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein’s abuse machine function.<br /><br />The skeptical read is that Kellen’s testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein’s access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein’s criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nPDWYcqxugpod1-b98xuayS-RkUtrcyS/view?pli=1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google Drive</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>727</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Sarah Kellen Congressional Transcript (Part 6) (6/14/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-sarah-kellen-congressional-transcript-part-6-6-14-26--72523547</link><description><![CDATA[Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein’s operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein’s abuse machine function.<br /><br />The skeptical read is that Kellen’s testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein’s access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein’s criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nPDWYcqxugpod1-b98xuayS-RkUtrcyS/view?pli=1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google Drive</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72523547</guid><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 16:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72523547/kellentranscript6.mp3" length="12940060" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/475e0bb0-cc19-4c17-86a8-3be07e2967b2/475e0bb0-cc19-4c17-86a8-3be07e2967b2.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/475e0bb0-cc19-4c17-86a8-3be07e2967b2/475e0bb0-cc19-4c17-86a8-3be07e2967b2.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/475e0bb0-cc19-4c17-86a8-3be07e2967b2/475e0bb0-cc19-4c17-86a8-3be07e2967b2.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein’s operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein’s operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein’s abuse machine function.<br /><br />The skeptical read is that Kellen’s testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein’s access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein’s criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nPDWYcqxugpod1-b98xuayS-RkUtrcyS/view?pli=1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google Drive</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>809</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  How Does Lesley Groff's Narrative Hold Up Against Known Evidence? (6/14/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-how-does-lesley-groff-s-narrative-hold-up-against-known-evidence-6-14-26--72514108</link><description><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein’s relationship with Lesley Groff was far deeper than the public first understood because she was not just a low-level secretary answering phones or handling routine paperwork. She worked for Epstein for roughly 18 years, managed his schedule, handled communications, arranged travel, coordinated meetings, and helped keep the daily machinery of his life moving. Epstein reportedly described her as an “extension of my brain,” which captures the level of trust and operational dependence involved. That kind of language matters because it shows Groff was not peripheral to Epstein’s world; she was embedded in it. She was one of the people through whom access flowed, appointments were made, messages were routed, and logistics were handled. Recent congressional scrutiny has emphasized exactly that point: Groff’s claim that she had a strictly professional relationship with Epstein sits against the reality that she was deeply integrated into the system that allowed his life, business, and private conduct to function.<br /><br />What makes the relationship more meaningful is the gap between Groff’s current defense and the documented scale of her role. She has told Congress that Epstein was a master manipulator who kept her in the dark about his crimes, and she denied knowingly helping facilitate abuse. But lawmakers and survivors have focused on the fact that she scheduled frequent massages, handled travel and communications, and remained in Epstein’s orbit for years, including after the Florida case made his criminal conduct public. Groff was also listed among the women covered by Epstein’s controversial 2007 non-prosecution agreement, which underscores how investigators viewed her proximity at the time. So the deeper picture is not simply employer and assistant; it is Epstein relying on Groff as a trusted gatekeeper while Groff now argues that trust did not include criminal knowledge. That tension is why her role remains so important: she was close enough to help run the infrastructure, even if she continues to deny understanding what that infrastructure was being used for.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72514108</guid><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 14:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72514108/megalesleygroffdeeptiesepstein.mp3" length="49888070" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0840dd23-2262-401b-8d96-c625dfc11b1e/0840dd23-2262-401b-8d96-c625dfc11b1e.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0840dd23-2262-401b-8d96-c625dfc11b1e/0840dd23-2262-401b-8d96-c625dfc11b1e.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0840dd23-2262-401b-8d96-c625dfc11b1e/0840dd23-2262-401b-8d96-c625dfc11b1e.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jeffrey Epstein’s relationship with Lesley Groff was far deeper than the public first understood because she was not just a low-level secretary answering phones or handling routine paperwork. She worked for Epstein for roughly 18 years, managed his...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein’s relationship with Lesley Groff was far deeper than the public first understood because she was not just a low-level secretary answering phones or handling routine paperwork. She worked for Epstein for roughly 18 years, managed his schedule, handled communications, arranged travel, coordinated meetings, and helped keep the daily machinery of his life moving. Epstein reportedly described her as an “extension of my brain,” which captures the level of trust and operational dependence involved. That kind of language matters because it shows Groff was not peripheral to Epstein’s world; she was embedded in it. She was one of the people through whom access flowed, appointments were made, messages were routed, and logistics were handled. Recent congressional scrutiny has emphasized exactly that point: Groff’s claim that she had a strictly professional relationship with Epstein sits against the reality that she was deeply integrated into the system that allowed his life, business, and private conduct to function.<br /><br />What makes the relationship more meaningful is the gap between Groff’s current defense and the documented scale of her role. She has told Congress that Epstein was a master manipulator who kept her in the dark about his crimes, and she denied knowingly helping facilitate abuse. But lawmakers and survivors have focused on the fact that she scheduled frequent massages, handled travel and communications, and remained in Epstein’s orbit for years, including after the Florida case made his criminal conduct public. Groff was also listed among the women covered by Epstein’s controversial 2007 non-prosecution agreement, which underscores how investigators viewed her proximity at the time. So the deeper picture is not simply employer and assistant; it is Epstein relying on Groff as a trusted gatekeeper while Groff now argues that trust did not include criminal knowledge. That tension is why her role remains so important: she was close enough to help run the infrastructure, even if she continues to deny understanding what that infrastructure was being used for.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3118</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The OIG Report Into The Death And Circumstances Of Epstein's Death (Part 9) (6/14/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-oig-report-into-the-death-and-circumstances-of-epstein-s-death-part-9-6-14-26--72502767</link><description><![CDATA[The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s death delivers a blistering indictment of systemic failures at the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and his holding facility. It documents a litany of procedural violations: Epstein’s cellmate was removed and never replaced despite explicit policy, surveillance cameras in his unit were malfunctioning or not recording, and the staff responsible for required 30-minute checks on Epstein didn’t perform them. Instead, employees falsified records indicating those rounds were completed, and in reality Epstein was alone and unchecked for hours before his death. These aren’t isolated mistakes—they’re classic symptoms of institutional collapse and neglect at a time when every safeguard should have been activated.<br /><br /><br />Beyond the immediate night of his death, the report underscores a deeper rot: long-standing staffing shortages, indifferent supervision, and a culture that tolerated policy breaches without accountability. The OIG identifies that the same deficiencies had been raised in prior reports about the BOP, yet were never effectively addressed. By allowing one of the most high-profile detainees in the nation to slip through the cracks under such glaring conditions, the BOP didn’t just fail Epstein—they failed the public trust and all the victims who sought justice.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72502767</guid><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 12:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72502767/megaoigdeath9.mp3" length="36986506" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/48e5d528-ada3-4da5-b24a-33f14b2682d4/48e5d528-ada3-4da5-b24a-33f14b2682d4.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/48e5d528-ada3-4da5-b24a-33f14b2682d4/48e5d528-ada3-4da5-b24a-33f14b2682d4.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/48e5d528-ada3-4da5-b24a-33f14b2682d4/48e5d528-ada3-4da5-b24a-33f14b2682d4.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s death delivers a blistering indictment of systemic failures at the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and his holding facility. It documents a litany of procedural violations: Epstein’s...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s death delivers a blistering indictment of systemic failures at the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and his holding facility. It documents a litany of procedural violations: Epstein’s cellmate was removed and never replaced despite explicit policy, surveillance cameras in his unit were malfunctioning or not recording, and the staff responsible for required 30-minute checks on Epstein didn’t perform them. Instead, employees falsified records indicating those rounds were completed, and in reality Epstein was alone and unchecked for hours before his death. These aren’t isolated mistakes—they’re classic symptoms of institutional collapse and neglect at a time when every safeguard should have been activated.<br /><br /><br />Beyond the immediate night of his death, the report underscores a deeper rot: long-standing staffing shortages, indifferent supervision, and a culture that tolerated policy breaches without accountability. The OIG identifies that the same deficiencies had been raised in prior reports about the BOP, yet were never effectively addressed. By allowing one of the most high-profile detainees in the nation to slip through the cracks under such glaring conditions, the BOP didn’t just fail Epstein—they failed the public trust and all the victims who sought justice.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2312</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The OIG Report Into The Death And Circumstances Of Epstein's Death (Part 8) (6/13/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-oig-report-into-the-death-and-circumstances-of-epstein-s-death-part-8-6-13-26--72502763</link><description><![CDATA[The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s death delivers a blistering indictment of systemic failures at the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and his holding facility. It documents a litany of procedural violations: Epstein’s cellmate was removed and never replaced despite explicit policy, surveillance cameras in his unit were malfunctioning or not recording, and the staff responsible for required 30-minute checks on Epstein didn’t perform them. Instead, employees falsified records indicating those rounds were completed, and in reality Epstein was alone and unchecked for hours before his death. These aren’t isolated mistakes—they’re classic symptoms of institutional collapse and neglect at a time when every safeguard should have been activated.<br /><br /><br />Beyond the immediate night of his death, the report underscores a deeper rot: long-standing staffing shortages, indifferent supervision, and a culture that tolerated policy breaches without accountability. The OIG identifies that the same deficiencies had been raised in prior reports about the BOP, yet were never effectively addressed. By allowing one of the most high-profile detainees in the nation to slip through the cracks under such glaring conditions, the BOP didn’t just fail Epstein—they failed the public trust and all the victims who sought justice.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72502763</guid><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72502763/megaoigdeath8.mp3" length="27617115" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0edac3a1-6bde-4248-8a5c-c19212a763bd/0edac3a1-6bde-4248-8a5c-c19212a763bd.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0edac3a1-6bde-4248-8a5c-c19212a763bd/0edac3a1-6bde-4248-8a5c-c19212a763bd.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0edac3a1-6bde-4248-8a5c-c19212a763bd/0edac3a1-6bde-4248-8a5c-c19212a763bd.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s death delivers a blistering indictment of systemic failures at the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and his holding facility. It documents a litany of procedural violations: Epstein’s...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s death delivers a blistering indictment of systemic failures at the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and his holding facility. It documents a litany of procedural violations: Epstein’s cellmate was removed and never replaced despite explicit policy, surveillance cameras in his unit were malfunctioning or not recording, and the staff responsible for required 30-minute checks on Epstein didn’t perform them. Instead, employees falsified records indicating those rounds were completed, and in reality Epstein was alone and unchecked for hours before his death. These aren’t isolated mistakes—they’re classic symptoms of institutional collapse and neglect at a time when every safeguard should have been activated.<br /><br /><br />Beyond the immediate night of his death, the report underscores a deeper rot: long-standing staffing shortages, indifferent supervision, and a culture that tolerated policy breaches without accountability. The OIG identifies that the same deficiencies had been raised in prior reports about the BOP, yet were never effectively addressed. By allowing one of the most high-profile detainees in the nation to slip through the cracks under such glaring conditions, the BOP didn’t just fail Epstein—they failed the public trust and all the victims who sought justice.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1727</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The OIG Report Into The Death And Circumstances Of Epstein's Death (Part 7) (6/13/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-oig-report-into-the-death-and-circumstances-of-epstein-s-death-part-7-6-13-26--72502768</link><description><![CDATA[The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s death delivers a blistering indictment of systemic failures at the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and his holding facility. It documents a litany of procedural violations: Epstein’s cellmate was removed and never replaced despite explicit policy, surveillance cameras in his unit were malfunctioning or not recording, and the staff responsible for required 30-minute checks on Epstein didn’t perform them. Instead, employees falsified records indicating those rounds were completed, and in reality Epstein was alone and unchecked for hours before his death. These aren’t isolated mistakes—they’re classic symptoms of institutional collapse and neglect at a time when every safeguard should have been activated.<br /><br /><br />Beyond the immediate night of his death, the report underscores a deeper rot: long-standing staffing shortages, indifferent supervision, and a culture that tolerated policy breaches without accountability. The OIG identifies that the same deficiencies had been raised in prior reports about the BOP, yet were never effectively addressed. By allowing one of the most high-profile detainees in the nation to slip through the cracks under such glaring conditions, the BOP didn’t just fail Epstein—they failed the public trust and all the victims who sought justice.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72502768</guid><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72502768/megaoigdeath7.mp3" length="31276765" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a389828f-06cc-4e95-98cd-eab13ef842b0/a389828f-06cc-4e95-98cd-eab13ef842b0.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a389828f-06cc-4e95-98cd-eab13ef842b0/a389828f-06cc-4e95-98cd-eab13ef842b0.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a389828f-06cc-4e95-98cd-eab13ef842b0/a389828f-06cc-4e95-98cd-eab13ef842b0.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s death delivers a blistering indictment of systemic failures at the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and his holding facility. It documents a litany of procedural violations: Epstein’s...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s death delivers a blistering indictment of systemic failures at the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and his holding facility. It documents a litany of procedural violations: Epstein’s cellmate was removed and never replaced despite explicit policy, surveillance cameras in his unit were malfunctioning or not recording, and the staff responsible for required 30-minute checks on Epstein didn’t perform them. Instead, employees falsified records indicating those rounds were completed, and in reality Epstein was alone and unchecked for hours before his death. These aren’t isolated mistakes—they’re classic symptoms of institutional collapse and neglect at a time when every safeguard should have been activated.<br /><br /><br />Beyond the immediate night of his death, the report underscores a deeper rot: long-standing staffing shortages, indifferent supervision, and a culture that tolerated policy breaches without accountability. The OIG identifies that the same deficiencies had been raised in prior reports about the BOP, yet were never effectively addressed. By allowing one of the most high-profile detainees in the nation to slip through the cracks under such glaring conditions, the BOP didn’t just fail Epstein—they failed the public trust and all the victims who sought justice.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1955</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The OIG Report Into The Death And Circumstances Of Epstein's Death (Part 6) (6/13/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-oig-report-into-the-death-and-circumstances-of-epstein-s-death-part-6-6-13-26--72502762</link><description><![CDATA[The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s death delivers a blistering indictment of systemic failures at the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and his holding facility. It documents a litany of procedural violations: Epstein’s cellmate was removed and never replaced despite explicit policy, surveillance cameras in his unit were malfunctioning or not recording, and the staff responsible for required 30-minute checks on Epstein didn’t perform them. Instead, employees falsified records indicating those rounds were completed, and in reality Epstein was alone and unchecked for hours before his death. These aren’t isolated mistakes—they’re classic symptoms of institutional collapse and neglect at a time when every safeguard should have been activated.<br /><br /><br />Beyond the immediate night of his death, the report underscores a deeper rot: long-standing staffing shortages, indifferent supervision, and a culture that tolerated policy breaches without accountability. The OIG identifies that the same deficiencies had been raised in prior reports about the BOP, yet were never effectively addressed. By allowing one of the most high-profile detainees in the nation to slip through the cracks under such glaring conditions, the BOP didn’t just fail Epstein—they failed the public trust and all the victims who sought justice.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72502762</guid><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72502762/megaoigdeathpart6.mp3" length="23152893" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/53cdb092-8a45-47b0-a8ff-767c01662216/53cdb092-8a45-47b0-a8ff-767c01662216.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/53cdb092-8a45-47b0-a8ff-767c01662216/53cdb092-8a45-47b0-a8ff-767c01662216.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/53cdb092-8a45-47b0-a8ff-767c01662216/53cdb092-8a45-47b0-a8ff-767c01662216.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s death delivers a blistering indictment of systemic failures at the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and his holding facility. It documents a litany of procedural violations: Epstein’s...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s death delivers a blistering indictment of systemic failures at the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and his holding facility. It documents a litany of procedural violations: Epstein’s cellmate was removed and never replaced despite explicit policy, surveillance cameras in his unit were malfunctioning or not recording, and the staff responsible for required 30-minute checks on Epstein didn’t perform them. Instead, employees falsified records indicating those rounds were completed, and in reality Epstein was alone and unchecked for hours before his death. These aren’t isolated mistakes—they’re classic symptoms of institutional collapse and neglect at a time when every safeguard should have been activated.<br /><br /><br />Beyond the immediate night of his death, the report underscores a deeper rot: long-standing staffing shortages, indifferent supervision, and a culture that tolerated policy breaches without accountability. The OIG identifies that the same deficiencies had been raised in prior reports about the BOP, yet were never effectively addressed. By allowing one of the most high-profile detainees in the nation to slip through the cracks under such glaring conditions, the BOP didn’t just fail Epstein—they failed the public trust and all the victims who sought justice.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1448</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Jennifer Araoz and Her Claims Against Ghislaine Maxwell</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/jennifer-araoz-and-her-claims-against-ghislaine-maxwell--72502507</link><description><![CDATA[Jennifer Araoz alleged that Ghislaine Maxwell played a direct, hands-on role in grooming and sexually abusing her when she was a minor in the mid-1990s. According to Araoz, Maxwell befriended her while presenting herself as a sophisticated mentor and benefactor, drawing her into a world of wealth and exclusivity that lowered her defenses. Araoz alleged that Maxwell initiated sexual contact, normalized inappropriate behavior, and framed abuse as something expected and acceptable, using manipulation and authority to maintain control. These encounters, Araoz said, occurred before she was introduced into Jeffrey Epstein’s broader abuse network, establishing Maxwell not merely as a facilitator, but as an active participant in the abuse itself.<br /><br />Araoz further alleged that Maxwell functioned as an enforcer within Epstein’s operation, reinforcing silence, dependency, and fear. She described being pressured to comply, discouraged from speaking out, and made to feel that resistance would carry consequences. In her civil lawsuit and public statements, Araoz positioned Ghislaine Maxwell as a central architect of the grooming process—someone who identified targets, broke down boundaries, and ensured Epstein’s access to victims. These allegations became a critical part of the broader evidentiary picture that portrayed Maxwell not as a peripheral figure, but as an indispensable actor whose conduct helped sustain and conceal Epstein’s criminal enterprise for years.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72502507</guid><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72502507/jenniferaraozmaxwell.mp3" length="15072488" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/952d9390-ec03-4bc5-8ac3-948a71d0db43/952d9390-ec03-4bc5-8ac3-948a71d0db43.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/952d9390-ec03-4bc5-8ac3-948a71d0db43/952d9390-ec03-4bc5-8ac3-948a71d0db43.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/952d9390-ec03-4bc5-8ac3-948a71d0db43/952d9390-ec03-4bc5-8ac3-948a71d0db43.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jennifer Araoz alleged that Ghislaine Maxwell played a direct, hands-on role in grooming and sexually abusing her when she was a minor in the mid-1990s. According to Araoz, Maxwell befriended her while presenting herself as a sophisticated mentor and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jennifer Araoz alleged that Ghislaine Maxwell played a direct, hands-on role in grooming and sexually abusing her when she was a minor in the mid-1990s. According to Araoz, Maxwell befriended her while presenting herself as a sophisticated mentor and benefactor, drawing her into a world of wealth and exclusivity that lowered her defenses. Araoz alleged that Maxwell initiated sexual contact, normalized inappropriate behavior, and framed abuse as something expected and acceptable, using manipulation and authority to maintain control. These encounters, Araoz said, occurred before she was introduced into Jeffrey Epstein’s broader abuse network, establishing Maxwell not merely as a facilitator, but as an active participant in the abuse itself.<br /><br />Araoz further alleged that Maxwell functioned as an enforcer within Epstein’s operation, reinforcing silence, dependency, and fear. She described being pressured to comply, discouraged from speaking out, and made to feel that resistance would carry consequences. In her civil lawsuit and public statements, Araoz positioned Ghislaine Maxwell as a central architect of the grooming process—someone who identified targets, broke down boundaries, and ensured Epstein’s access to victims. These allegations became a critical part of the broader evidentiary picture that portrayed Maxwell not as a peripheral figure, but as an indispensable actor whose conduct helped sustain and conceal Epstein’s criminal enterprise for years.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>943</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Lawsuit Against Leon Black Continues To Heat Up After 'Elizabeth' Speaks Up</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-lawsuit-against-leon-black-continues-to-heat-up-after-elizabeth-speaks-up--72502506</link><description><![CDATA[The lawsuit that has been filed against Leon Black that accuses of him of assaulting a learning disabled girl continues to make its way through the courts and each filing is more contentious than the next. <br /><br /><br />In this episode, we hear from the alleged cheer coach who the plaintiff accuses of trafficking her to Epstein and Maxwell and according to her deposition, none of what the accuser says is true. <br /><br /><br />So, what's really going on here?<br /><br /><br />Let's dive in and try to find some clarity. <br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.thedailybeast.com/cheerleading-coach-claims-she-never-trafficked-teen-girl-to-leon-black-and-jeffrey-epstein" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Cheerleading Coach Claims She Never Trafficked Teen Girl to Leon Black and Jeffrey Epstein (thedailybeast.com)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72502506</guid><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72502506/lawsuitleonheatsup.mp3" length="16372758" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/851e9ea6-eedc-4a5a-bdf8-2e9d2da2d384/851e9ea6-eedc-4a5a-bdf8-2e9d2da2d384.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/851e9ea6-eedc-4a5a-bdf8-2e9d2da2d384/851e9ea6-eedc-4a5a-bdf8-2e9d2da2d384.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/851e9ea6-eedc-4a5a-bdf8-2e9d2da2d384/851e9ea6-eedc-4a5a-bdf8-2e9d2da2d384.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The lawsuit that has been filed against Leon Black that accuses of him of assaulting a learning disabled girl continues to make its way through the courts and each filing is more contentious than the next. 


In this episode, we hear from the alleged...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The lawsuit that has been filed against Leon Black that accuses of him of assaulting a learning disabled girl continues to make its way through the courts and each filing is more contentious than the next. <br /><br /><br />In this episode, we hear from the alleged cheer coach who the plaintiff accuses of trafficking her to Epstein and Maxwell and according to her deposition, none of what the accuser says is true. <br /><br /><br />So, what's really going on here?<br /><br /><br />Let's dive in and try to find some clarity. <br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.thedailybeast.com/cheerleading-coach-claims-she-never-trafficked-teen-girl-to-leon-black-and-jeffrey-epstein" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Cheerleading Coach Claims She Never Trafficked Teen Girl to Leon Black and Jeffrey Epstein (thedailybeast.com)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1024</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>JP Morgan Chase Responds To The Lawsuit In the United States Virgin Islands</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/jp-morgan-chase-responds-to-the-lawsuit-in-the-united-states-virgin-islands--72502504</link><description><![CDATA[Banking giant JP Morgan and Chase is embroiled in a lawsuit with the United States Virgin Islands who is claiming that the bank helped and facilitated Jeffrey Epstein's crime within their territory. JP Morgan responded to that lawsuit today and they didn't hold back. <br /><br /><br /><br />Let's dive in and take a look!<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://lawandcrime.com/live-trials/live-trials-current/jeffrey-epstein/jpmorgan-chase-worlds-largest-bank-slams-lawsuit-for-bankrolling-jeffrey-epstein-as-meritless-reach-into-deeper-pockets/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">JPMorgan Chase Skewers Virgin Islands Jeffrey Epstein Suit (lawandcrime.com)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72502504</guid><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72502504/jpmorganchaserespondsusvi.mp3" length="11809062" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c1e34f27-4435-437f-b6dc-8d5bc40be42f/c1e34f27-4435-437f-b6dc-8d5bc40be42f.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c1e34f27-4435-437f-b6dc-8d5bc40be42f/c1e34f27-4435-437f-b6dc-8d5bc40be42f.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c1e34f27-4435-437f-b6dc-8d5bc40be42f/c1e34f27-4435-437f-b6dc-8d5bc40be42f.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Banking giant JP Morgan and Chase is embroiled in a lawsuit with the United States Virgin Islands who is claiming that the bank helped and facilitated Jeffrey Epstein's crime within their territory. JP Morgan responded to that lawsuit today and they...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Banking giant JP Morgan and Chase is embroiled in a lawsuit with the United States Virgin Islands who is claiming that the bank helped and facilitated Jeffrey Epstein's crime within their territory. JP Morgan responded to that lawsuit today and they didn't hold back. <br /><br /><br /><br />Let's dive in and take a look!<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://lawandcrime.com/live-trials/live-trials-current/jeffrey-epstein/jpmorgan-chase-worlds-largest-bank-slams-lawsuit-for-bankrolling-jeffrey-epstein-as-meritless-reach-into-deeper-pockets/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">JPMorgan Chase Skewers Virgin Islands Jeffrey Epstein Suit (lawandcrime.com)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>739</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Joint Letter Regarding Discovery Dispute In The Leon Black/Jane Doe Lawsuit</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-joint-letter-regarding-discovery-dispute-in-the-leon-black-jane-doe-lawsuit--72502508</link><description><![CDATA[In the case of Jane Doe v. Leon Black (1:23-cv-06418-JGLC), the parties have submitted a joint letter regarding a discovery dispute over Defendant Leon Black’s request to quash or modify deposition subpoenas. These subpoenas are intended for three of Mr. Black’s attorneys and his wife. The request was made pursuant to Rule 4(k) of Judge Clarke’s Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases.<br /><br />Defendant has requested an informal conference to address the matter, as provided under Rule 4(k). However, Plaintiff does not agree that such a conference is necessary. This disagreement highlights a procedural conflict regarding how to proceed with resolving the subpoena dispute.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.602764/gov.uscourts.nysd.602764.166.0.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">gov.uscourts.nysd.602764.166.0.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72502508</guid><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72502508/jointletterleonjanedoe.mp3" length="14049324" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1fc46edd-13b9-4453-bfac-070d9fb358be/1fc46edd-13b9-4453-bfac-070d9fb358be.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1fc46edd-13b9-4453-bfac-070d9fb358be/1fc46edd-13b9-4453-bfac-070d9fb358be.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1fc46edd-13b9-4453-bfac-070d9fb358be/1fc46edd-13b9-4453-bfac-070d9fb358be.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In the case of Jane Doe v. Leon Black (1:23-cv-06418-JGLC), the parties have submitted a joint letter regarding a discovery dispute over Defendant Leon Black’s request to quash or modify deposition subpoenas. These subpoenas are intended for three of...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In the case of Jane Doe v. Leon Black (1:23-cv-06418-JGLC), the parties have submitted a joint letter regarding a discovery dispute over Defendant Leon Black’s request to quash or modify deposition subpoenas. These subpoenas are intended for three of Mr. Black’s attorneys and his wife. The request was made pursuant to Rule 4(k) of Judge Clarke’s Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases.<br /><br />Defendant has requested an informal conference to address the matter, as provided under Rule 4(k). However, Plaintiff does not agree that such a conference is necessary. This disagreement highlights a procedural conflict regarding how to proceed with resolving the subpoena dispute.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.602764/gov.uscourts.nysd.602764.166.0.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">gov.uscourts.nysd.602764.166.0.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>879</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Sarah Kellen Congressional Transcript (Part 5) (6/13/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-sarah-kellen-congressional-transcript-part-5-6-13-26--72513490</link><description><![CDATA[Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein’s operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein’s abuse machine function.<br /><br />The skeptical read is that Kellen’s testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein’s access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein’s criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nPDWYcqxugpod1-b98xuayS-RkUtrcyS/view?pli=1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google Drive</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72513490</guid><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 20:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72513490/kellentranscript5.mp3" length="14362793" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/80dec3e8-9d08-4d99-8ad1-e82208e2c006/80dec3e8-9d08-4d99-8ad1-e82208e2c006.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/80dec3e8-9d08-4d99-8ad1-e82208e2c006/80dec3e8-9d08-4d99-8ad1-e82208e2c006.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/80dec3e8-9d08-4d99-8ad1-e82208e2c006/80dec3e8-9d08-4d99-8ad1-e82208e2c006.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein’s operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein’s operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein’s abuse machine function.<br /><br />The skeptical read is that Kellen’s testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein’s access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein’s criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nPDWYcqxugpod1-b98xuayS-RkUtrcyS/view?pli=1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google Drive</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>898</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Sarah Kellen Congressional Transcript (Part 4) (6/13/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-sarah-kellen-congressional-transcript-part-4-6-13-26--72513486</link><description><![CDATA[Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein’s operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein’s abuse machine function.<br /><br />The skeptical read is that Kellen’s testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein’s access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein’s criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nPDWYcqxugpod1-b98xuayS-RkUtrcyS/view?pli=1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google Drive</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72513486</guid><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 18:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72513486/kellentranscript4.mp3" length="12812164" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1b250842-69c9-4e52-90b6-cf04ab738435/1b250842-69c9-4e52-90b6-cf04ab738435.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1b250842-69c9-4e52-90b6-cf04ab738435/1b250842-69c9-4e52-90b6-cf04ab738435.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1b250842-69c9-4e52-90b6-cf04ab738435/1b250842-69c9-4e52-90b6-cf04ab738435.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein’s operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein’s operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein’s abuse machine function.<br /><br />The skeptical read is that Kellen’s testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein’s access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein’s criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nPDWYcqxugpod1-b98xuayS-RkUtrcyS/view?pli=1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google Drive</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>801</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Sarah Kellen Congressional Transcript (Part 3) (6/13/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-sarah-kellen-congressional-transcript-part-3-6-13-26--72513485</link><description><![CDATA[Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein’s operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein’s abuse machine function.<br /><br />The skeptical read is that Kellen’s testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein’s access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein’s criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nPDWYcqxugpod1-b98xuayS-RkUtrcyS/view?pli=1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google Drive</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72513485</guid><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72513485/kellentranscript3.mp3" length="13113931" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d1f4437b-e4c0-48c7-8caa-a91e4ac20d1d/d1f4437b-e4c0-48c7-8caa-a91e4ac20d1d.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d1f4437b-e4c0-48c7-8caa-a91e4ac20d1d/d1f4437b-e4c0-48c7-8caa-a91e4ac20d1d.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d1f4437b-e4c0-48c7-8caa-a91e4ac20d1d/d1f4437b-e4c0-48c7-8caa-a91e4ac20d1d.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein’s operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein’s operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein’s abuse machine function.<br /><br />The skeptical read is that Kellen’s testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein’s access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein’s criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nPDWYcqxugpod1-b98xuayS-RkUtrcyS/view?pli=1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google Drive</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>820</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The OIG Report Into The Death And Circumstances Of Epstein's Death (Part 5) (6/13/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-oig-report-into-the-death-and-circumstances-of-epstein-s-death-part-5-6-13-26--72502764</link><description><![CDATA[The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s death delivers a blistering indictment of systemic failures at the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and his holding facility. It documents a litany of procedural violations: Epstein’s cellmate was removed and never replaced despite explicit policy, surveillance cameras in his unit were malfunctioning or not recording, and the staff responsible for required 30-minute checks on Epstein didn’t perform them. Instead, employees falsified records indicating those rounds were completed, and in reality Epstein was alone and unchecked for hours before his death. These aren’t isolated mistakes—they’re classic symptoms of institutional collapse and neglect at a time when every safeguard should have been activated.<br /><br /><br />Beyond the immediate night of his death, the report underscores a deeper rot: long-standing staffing shortages, indifferent supervision, and a culture that tolerated policy breaches without accountability. The OIG identifies that the same deficiencies had been raised in prior reports about the BOP, yet were never effectively addressed. By allowing one of the most high-profile detainees in the nation to slip through the cracks under such glaring conditions, the BOP didn’t just fail Epstein—they failed the public trust and all the victims who sought justice.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72502764</guid><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72502764/megaoigdeathpart5.mp3" length="31804230" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/25d14a4b-ac62-47c1-9e08-3da6c5540f22/25d14a4b-ac62-47c1-9e08-3da6c5540f22.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/25d14a4b-ac62-47c1-9e08-3da6c5540f22/25d14a4b-ac62-47c1-9e08-3da6c5540f22.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/25d14a4b-ac62-47c1-9e08-3da6c5540f22/25d14a4b-ac62-47c1-9e08-3da6c5540f22.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s death delivers a blistering indictment of systemic failures at the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and his holding facility. It documents a litany of procedural violations: Epstein’s...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s death delivers a blistering indictment of systemic failures at the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and his holding facility. It documents a litany of procedural violations: Epstein’s cellmate was removed and never replaced despite explicit policy, surveillance cameras in his unit were malfunctioning or not recording, and the staff responsible for required 30-minute checks on Epstein didn’t perform them. Instead, employees falsified records indicating those rounds were completed, and in reality Epstein was alone and unchecked for hours before his death. These aren’t isolated mistakes—they’re classic symptoms of institutional collapse and neglect at a time when every safeguard should have been activated.<br /><br /><br />Beyond the immediate night of his death, the report underscores a deeper rot: long-standing staffing shortages, indifferent supervision, and a culture that tolerated policy breaches without accountability. The OIG identifies that the same deficiencies had been raised in prior reports about the BOP, yet were never effectively addressed. By allowing one of the most high-profile detainees in the nation to slip through the cracks under such glaring conditions, the BOP didn’t just fail Epstein—they failed the public trust and all the victims who sought justice.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1988</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The OIG Report Into The Death And Circumstances Of Epstein's Death (Part 4) (6/13/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-oig-report-into-the-death-and-circumstances-of-epstein-s-death-part-4-6-13-26--72502765</link><description><![CDATA[The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s death delivers a blistering indictment of systemic failures at the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and his holding facility. It documents a litany of procedural violations: Epstein’s cellmate was removed and never replaced despite explicit policy, surveillance cameras in his unit were malfunctioning or not recording, and the staff responsible for required 30-minute checks on Epstein didn’t perform them. Instead, employees falsified records indicating those rounds were completed, and in reality Epstein was alone and unchecked for hours before his death. These aren’t isolated mistakes—they’re classic symptoms of institutional collapse and neglect at a time when every safeguard should have been activated.<br /><br /><br />Beyond the immediate night of his death, the report underscores a deeper rot: long-standing staffing shortages, indifferent supervision, and a culture that tolerated policy breaches without accountability. The OIG identifies that the same deficiencies had been raised in prior reports about the BOP, yet were never effectively addressed. By allowing one of the most high-profile detainees in the nation to slip through the cracks under such glaring conditions, the BOP didn’t just fail Epstein—they failed the public trust and all the victims who sought justice.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72502765</guid><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72502765/megadeathoigpart4.mp3" length="24083270" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cecaf67e-ab8c-46ab-86ee-ea5f0ed4706d/cecaf67e-ab8c-46ab-86ee-ea5f0ed4706d.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cecaf67e-ab8c-46ab-86ee-ea5f0ed4706d/cecaf67e-ab8c-46ab-86ee-ea5f0ed4706d.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cecaf67e-ab8c-46ab-86ee-ea5f0ed4706d/cecaf67e-ab8c-46ab-86ee-ea5f0ed4706d.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s death delivers a blistering indictment of systemic failures at the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and his holding facility. It documents a litany of procedural violations: Epstein’s...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s death delivers a blistering indictment of systemic failures at the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and his holding facility. It documents a litany of procedural violations: Epstein’s cellmate was removed and never replaced despite explicit policy, surveillance cameras in his unit were malfunctioning or not recording, and the staff responsible for required 30-minute checks on Epstein didn’t perform them. Instead, employees falsified records indicating those rounds were completed, and in reality Epstein was alone and unchecked for hours before his death. These aren’t isolated mistakes—they’re classic symptoms of institutional collapse and neglect at a time when every safeguard should have been activated.<br /><br /><br />Beyond the immediate night of his death, the report underscores a deeper rot: long-standing staffing shortages, indifferent supervision, and a culture that tolerated policy breaches without accountability. The OIG identifies that the same deficiencies had been raised in prior reports about the BOP, yet were never effectively addressed. By allowing one of the most high-profile detainees in the nation to slip through the cracks under such glaring conditions, the BOP didn’t just fail Epstein—they failed the public trust and all the victims who sought justice.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1506</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The OIG Report Into The Death And Circumstances Of Epstein's Death (Part 3) (6/13/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-oig-report-into-the-death-and-circumstances-of-epstein-s-death-part-3-6-13-26--72502769</link><description><![CDATA[The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s death delivers a blistering indictment of systemic failures at the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and his holding facility. It documents a litany of procedural violations: Epstein’s cellmate was removed and never replaced despite explicit policy, surveillance cameras in his unit were malfunctioning or not recording, and the staff responsible for required 30-minute checks on Epstein didn’t perform them. Instead, employees falsified records indicating those rounds were completed, and in reality Epstein was alone and unchecked for hours before his death. These aren’t isolated mistakes—they’re classic symptoms of institutional collapse and neglect at a time when every safeguard should have been activated.<br /><br /><br />Beyond the immediate night of his death, the report underscores a deeper rot: long-standing staffing shortages, indifferent supervision, and a culture that tolerated policy breaches without accountability. The OIG identifies that the same deficiencies had been raised in prior reports about the BOP, yet were never effectively addressed. By allowing one of the most high-profile detainees in the nation to slip through the cracks under such glaring conditions, the BOP didn’t just fail Epstein—they failed the public trust and all the victims who sought justice.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72502769</guid><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 10:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72502769/megaoigdeathpart3.mp3" length="27988262" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6990c565-271f-4450-894f-1cd81415cd9a/6990c565-271f-4450-894f-1cd81415cd9a.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6990c565-271f-4450-894f-1cd81415cd9a/6990c565-271f-4450-894f-1cd81415cd9a.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6990c565-271f-4450-894f-1cd81415cd9a/6990c565-271f-4450-894f-1cd81415cd9a.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s death delivers a blistering indictment of systemic failures at the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and his holding facility. It documents a litany of procedural violations: Epstein’s...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s death delivers a blistering indictment of systemic failures at the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and his holding facility. It documents a litany of procedural violations: Epstein’s cellmate was removed and never replaced despite explicit policy, surveillance cameras in his unit were malfunctioning or not recording, and the staff responsible for required 30-minute checks on Epstein didn’t perform them. Instead, employees falsified records indicating those rounds were completed, and in reality Epstein was alone and unchecked for hours before his death. These aren’t isolated mistakes—they’re classic symptoms of institutional collapse and neglect at a time when every safeguard should have been activated.<br /><br /><br />Beyond the immediate night of his death, the report underscores a deeper rot: long-standing staffing shortages, indifferent supervision, and a culture that tolerated policy breaches without accountability. The OIG identifies that the same deficiencies had been raised in prior reports about the BOP, yet were never effectively addressed. By allowing one of the most high-profile detainees in the nation to slip through the cracks under such glaring conditions, the BOP didn’t just fail Epstein—they failed the public trust and all the victims who sought justice.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1750</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The OIG Report Into The Death And Circumstances Of Epstein's Death (Part 2) (6/13/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-oig-report-into-the-death-and-circumstances-of-epstein-s-death-part-2-6-13-26--72502766</link><description><![CDATA[The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s death delivers a blistering indictment of systemic failures at the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and his holding facility. It documents a litany of procedural violations: Epstein’s cellmate was removed and never replaced despite explicit policy, surveillance cameras in his unit were malfunctioning or not recording, and the staff responsible for required 30-minute checks on Epstein didn’t perform them. Instead, employees falsified records indicating those rounds were completed, and in reality Epstein was alone and unchecked for hours before his death. These aren’t isolated mistakes—they’re classic symptoms of institutional collapse and neglect at a time when every safeguard should have been activated.<br /><br /><br />Beyond the immediate night of his death, the report underscores a deeper rot: long-standing staffing shortages, indifferent supervision, and a culture that tolerated policy breaches without accountability. The OIG identifies that the same deficiencies had been raised in prior reports about the BOP, yet were never effectively addressed. By allowing one of the most high-profile detainees in the nation to slip through the cracks under such glaring conditions, the BOP didn’t just fail Epstein—they failed the public trust and all the victims who sought justice.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72502766</guid><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 08:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72502766/megaoigdeathpart2.mp3" length="41892093" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/049e637c-12bf-46df-b088-1f2a68e5e9b9/049e637c-12bf-46df-b088-1f2a68e5e9b9.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/049e637c-12bf-46df-b088-1f2a68e5e9b9/049e637c-12bf-46df-b088-1f2a68e5e9b9.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/049e637c-12bf-46df-b088-1f2a68e5e9b9/049e637c-12bf-46df-b088-1f2a68e5e9b9.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s death delivers a blistering indictment of systemic failures at the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and his holding facility. It documents a litany of procedural violations: Epstein’s...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s death delivers a blistering indictment of systemic failures at the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and his holding facility. It documents a litany of procedural violations: Epstein’s cellmate was removed and never replaced despite explicit policy, surveillance cameras in his unit were malfunctioning or not recording, and the staff responsible for required 30-minute checks on Epstein didn’t perform them. Instead, employees falsified records indicating those rounds were completed, and in reality Epstein was alone and unchecked for hours before his death. These aren’t isolated mistakes—they’re classic symptoms of institutional collapse and neglect at a time when every safeguard should have been activated.<br /><br /><br />Beyond the immediate night of his death, the report underscores a deeper rot: long-standing staffing shortages, indifferent supervision, and a culture that tolerated policy breaches without accountability. The OIG identifies that the same deficiencies had been raised in prior reports about the BOP, yet were never effectively addressed. By allowing one of the most high-profile detainees in the nation to slip through the cracks under such glaring conditions, the BOP didn’t just fail Epstein—they failed the public trust and all the victims who sought justice.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2619</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The OIG Report Into The Death And Circumstances Of Epstein's Death (Part 1) (6/12/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-oig-report-into-the-death-and-circumstances-of-epstein-s-death-part-1-6-12-26--72502770</link><description><![CDATA[The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s death delivers a blistering indictment of systemic failures at the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and his holding facility. It documents a litany of procedural violations: Epstein’s cellmate was removed and never replaced despite explicit policy, surveillance cameras in his unit were malfunctioning or not recording, and the staff responsible for required 30-minute checks on Epstein didn’t perform them. Instead, employees falsified records indicating those rounds were completed, and in reality Epstein was alone and unchecked for hours before his death. These aren’t isolated mistakes—they’re classic symptoms of institutional collapse and neglect at a time when every safeguard should have been activated.<br /><br /><br />Beyond the immediate night of his death, the report underscores a deeper rot: long-standing staffing shortages, indifferent supervision, and a culture that tolerated policy breaches without accountability. The OIG identifies that the same deficiencies had been raised in prior reports about the BOP, yet were never effectively addressed. By allowing one of the most high-profile detainees in the nation to slip through the cracks under such glaring conditions, the BOP didn’t just fail Epstein—they failed the public trust and all the victims who sought justice.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72502770</guid><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72502770/megaepsteinoigdeathpart1.mp3" length="30671142" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/34ea1055-5d02-4dab-b4f5-173e2751854a/34ea1055-5d02-4dab-b4f5-173e2751854a.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/34ea1055-5d02-4dab-b4f5-173e2751854a/34ea1055-5d02-4dab-b4f5-173e2751854a.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/34ea1055-5d02-4dab-b4f5-173e2751854a/34ea1055-5d02-4dab-b4f5-173e2751854a.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s death delivers a blistering indictment of systemic failures at the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and his holding facility. It documents a litany of procedural violations: Epstein’s...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s death delivers a blistering indictment of systemic failures at the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and his holding facility. It documents a litany of procedural violations: Epstein’s cellmate was removed and never replaced despite explicit policy, surveillance cameras in his unit were malfunctioning or not recording, and the staff responsible for required 30-minute checks on Epstein didn’t perform them. Instead, employees falsified records indicating those rounds were completed, and in reality Epstein was alone and unchecked for hours before his death. These aren’t isolated mistakes—they’re classic symptoms of institutional collapse and neglect at a time when every safeguard should have been activated.<br /><br /><br />Beyond the immediate night of his death, the report underscores a deeper rot: long-standing staffing shortages, indifferent supervision, and a culture that tolerated policy breaches without accountability. The OIG identifies that the same deficiencies had been raised in prior reports about the BOP, yet were never effectively addressed. By allowing one of the most high-profile detainees in the nation to slip through the cracks under such glaring conditions, the BOP didn’t just fail Epstein—they failed the public trust and all the victims who sought justice.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1917</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>From Edward VIII to Prince Andrew: Measuring the Scale of a Royal Crisis</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/from-edward-viii-to-prince-andrew-measuring-the-scale-of-a-royal-crisis--72324205</link><description><![CDATA[Prince Andrew’s ties to Jeffrey Epstein are being framed as one of the most serious crises the British monarchy has faced in modern history, with some arguing the damage rivals—or even exceeds—the fallout from King Edward VIII’s abdication. Unlike that earlier scandal, which unfolded in a very different media landscape, Andrew’s situation has played out under constant global scrutiny, with graphic allegations, civil litigation, and years of reporting keeping the story alive. The result has been a prolonged reputational bleed for the royal family, not just a one-time shock, with Andrew forced out of public life, stripped of titles, and effectively erased from official duties while the controversy continues to resurface.<br /><br />At the same time, the situation has exposed deeper issues inside the monarchy, particularly how concerns about Andrew were handled long before the scandal exploded publicly. There are claims that warning signs were ignored and that efforts to shield him only made the eventual fallout worse, feeding the perception of an institution more concerned with self-preservation than accountability. The ongoing damage isn’t just about Andrew personally—it raises broader questions about leadership, judgment, and whether the monarchy can adapt to modern expectations of transparency, especially as each new revelation drags the story back into the spotlight.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/royals/article-15670755/Andrew-links-Epstein-scandal-crisis-royals-abdication-Edward-VIII-Andrew-Lownie.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor's links to Epstein scandal is more of a crisis for royals than abdication of Edward VIII, biographer Andrew Lownie claims | Daily Mail Online</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72324205</guid><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72324205/andrewbiggestdisgraceedwardviii.mp3" length="10999893" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e654fa3b-4452-487f-83fb-7fd1489f3b33/e654fa3b-4452-487f-83fb-7fd1489f3b33.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e654fa3b-4452-487f-83fb-7fd1489f3b33/e654fa3b-4452-487f-83fb-7fd1489f3b33.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e654fa3b-4452-487f-83fb-7fd1489f3b33/e654fa3b-4452-487f-83fb-7fd1489f3b33.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Prince Andrew’s ties to Jeffrey Epstein are being framed as one of the most serious crises the British monarchy has faced in modern history, with some arguing the damage rivals—or even exceeds—the fallout from King Edward VIII’s abdication. Unlike...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Prince Andrew’s ties to Jeffrey Epstein are being framed as one of the most serious crises the British monarchy has faced in modern history, with some arguing the damage rivals—or even exceeds—the fallout from King Edward VIII’s abdication. Unlike that earlier scandal, which unfolded in a very different media landscape, Andrew’s situation has played out under constant global scrutiny, with graphic allegations, civil litigation, and years of reporting keeping the story alive. The result has been a prolonged reputational bleed for the royal family, not just a one-time shock, with Andrew forced out of public life, stripped of titles, and effectively erased from official duties while the controversy continues to resurface.<br /><br />At the same time, the situation has exposed deeper issues inside the monarchy, particularly how concerns about Andrew were handled long before the scandal exploded publicly. There are claims that warning signs were ignored and that efforts to shield him only made the eventual fallout worse, feeding the perception of an institution more concerned with self-preservation than accountability. The ongoing damage isn’t just about Andrew personally—it raises broader questions about leadership, judgment, and whether the monarchy can adapt to modern expectations of transparency, especially as each new revelation drags the story back into the spotlight.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/royals/article-15670755/Andrew-links-Epstein-scandal-crisis-royals-abdication-Edward-VIII-Andrew-Lownie.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor's links to Epstein scandal is more of a crisis for royals than abdication of Edward VIII, biographer Andrew Lownie claims | Daily Mail Online</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>688</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Elizabeth Stein And The  Allegations She Made  Against Maxwell</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/elizabeth-stein-and-the-allegations-she-made-against-maxwell--72502505</link><description><![CDATA[Elizabeth Stein alleged that she was sexually abused by Jeffrey Epstein when she was a minor and that the Epstein estate should be held financially and legally responsible for the harm she suffered. In her claims, Stein described being recruited and trafficked into Epstein’s abuse network, arguing that Epstein used his wealth, properties, and paid staff to facilitate the exploitation of underage girls. She maintained that the abuse was not an isolated incident but part of a broader, well-organized system designed to obtain, groom, and silence victims.<br /><br /><br />Stein further alleged that Epstein’s assets—now controlled by the Epstein estate—were built and maintained in part through this criminal enterprise, making the estate liable even after Epstein’s death. Her legal position centered on the idea that Epstein’s death should not extinguish accountability, especially where victims were denied justice during his lifetime due to non-prosecution agreements and systemic failures. By targeting the estate, Stein sought both compensation and recognition of the lasting damage caused by Epstein’s conduct, emphasizing that civil accountability was one of the few remaining avenues for survivors to confront the harm done to them.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72502505</guid><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72502505/estatemaxwellnamedlawsuitstein.mp3" length="14637809" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/489256c4-b15b-4410-aa53-2be1d9fcc6d3/489256c4-b15b-4410-aa53-2be1d9fcc6d3.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/489256c4-b15b-4410-aa53-2be1d9fcc6d3/489256c4-b15b-4410-aa53-2be1d9fcc6d3.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/489256c4-b15b-4410-aa53-2be1d9fcc6d3/489256c4-b15b-4410-aa53-2be1d9fcc6d3.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Elizabeth Stein alleged that she was sexually abused by Jeffrey Epstein when she was a minor and that the Epstein estate should be held financially and legally responsible for the harm she suffered. In her claims, Stein described being recruited and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Elizabeth Stein alleged that she was sexually abused by Jeffrey Epstein when she was a minor and that the Epstein estate should be held financially and legally responsible for the harm she suffered. In her claims, Stein described being recruited and trafficked into Epstein’s abuse network, arguing that Epstein used his wealth, properties, and paid staff to facilitate the exploitation of underage girls. She maintained that the abuse was not an isolated incident but part of a broader, well-organized system designed to obtain, groom, and silence victims.<br /><br /><br />Stein further alleged that Epstein’s assets—now controlled by the Epstein estate—were built and maintained in part through this criminal enterprise, making the estate liable even after Epstein’s death. Her legal position centered on the idea that Epstein’s death should not extinguish accountability, especially where victims were denied justice during his lifetime due to non-prosecution agreements and systemic failures. By targeting the estate, Stein sought both compensation and recognition of the lasting damage caused by Epstein’s conduct, emphasizing that civil accountability was one of the few remaining avenues for survivors to confront the harm done to them.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>915</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Many Disturbing Allegations Filed Against Epstein's Estate</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-many-disturbing-allegations-filed-against-epstein-s-estate--72502500</link><description><![CDATA[The allegations made against Jeffrey Epstein’s estate are disturbing not only for their substance but for what they reveal about the scale and persistence of harm long after Epstein’s death. Multiple survivors allege that the estate represents assets accumulated through systematic sexual exploitation of minors, and that those assets are inseparable from the crimes themselves. According to these claims, Epstein’s wealth was not incidental background noise to the abuse but a central mechanism that enabled it—funding travel, properties, recruitment pipelines, and silence. The estate, in this framing, becomes a lingering extension of the original wrongdoing: a financial structure built on exploitation that continues to exist even though its architect is gone.<br /><br />What makes the allegations especially troubling is the assertion that the estate has fought aggressively to limit accountability, narrow liability, and minimize survivor compensation, despite the overwhelming evidence of Epstein’s conduct. Survivors argue that this posture effectively retraumatizes victims by forcing them to relitigate their abuse in financial terms, pitting human harm against balance sheets and legal maneuvering. The disturbing core of these allegations is not simply that horrific crimes occurred, but that the wealth derived from those crimes remains protected, litigated over, and treated as legitimate property. In that sense, the case against Epstein’s estate is not just about past abuse—it is about whether a system allows profits from exploitation to outlive the victims’ suffering and escape full moral and legal reckoning.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72502500</guid><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72502500/disturbingallegatinsfiledestaste.mp3" length="11707498" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5047ba51-4bb7-4407-87ba-792f272baf83/5047ba51-4bb7-4407-87ba-792f272baf83.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5047ba51-4bb7-4407-87ba-792f272baf83/5047ba51-4bb7-4407-87ba-792f272baf83.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5047ba51-4bb7-4407-87ba-792f272baf83/5047ba51-4bb7-4407-87ba-792f272baf83.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The allegations made against Jeffrey Epstein’s estate are disturbing not only for their substance but for what they reveal about the scale and persistence of harm long after Epstein’s death. Multiple survivors allege that the estate represents assets...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The allegations made against Jeffrey Epstein’s estate are disturbing not only for their substance but for what they reveal about the scale and persistence of harm long after Epstein’s death. Multiple survivors allege that the estate represents assets accumulated through systematic sexual exploitation of minors, and that those assets are inseparable from the crimes themselves. According to these claims, Epstein’s wealth was not incidental background noise to the abuse but a central mechanism that enabled it—funding travel, properties, recruitment pipelines, and silence. The estate, in this framing, becomes a lingering extension of the original wrongdoing: a financial structure built on exploitation that continues to exist even though its architect is gone.<br /><br />What makes the allegations especially troubling is the assertion that the estate has fought aggressively to limit accountability, narrow liability, and minimize survivor compensation, despite the overwhelming evidence of Epstein’s conduct. Survivors argue that this posture effectively retraumatizes victims by forcing them to relitigate their abuse in financial terms, pitting human harm against balance sheets and legal maneuvering. The disturbing core of these allegations is not simply that horrific crimes occurred, but that the wealth derived from those crimes remains protected, litigated over, and treated as legitimate property. In that sense, the case against Epstein’s estate is not just about past abuse—it is about whether a system allows profits from exploitation to outlive the victims’ suffering and escape full moral and legal reckoning.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>732</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Inside Epstein’s Attempt to Influence Mortimer Zuckerman’s Personal Affairs</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/inside-epstein-s-attempt-to-influence-mortimer-zuckerman-s-personal-affairs--72324203</link><description><![CDATA[Newly released documents show that Jeffrey Epstein urged billionaire media mogul Mortimer Zuckerman to relinquish control over his personal and business affairs, citing concerns about Zuckerman’s health and mental capacity. Epstein reportedly suggested that Zuckerman consider entering a form of guardianship or conservatorship, positioning himself as someone capable of helping manage or influence those affairs. The communication reflects the unusually personal and advisory role Epstein attempted to play in the lives of powerful figures within his network.<br /><br />The revelations add to a growing body of evidence showing Epstein’s efforts to exert influence over elite individuals beyond financial dealings, extending into media, personal decision-making, and institutional control. Zuckerman, a prominent media owner, had already been linked to Epstein through prior disclosures showing attempts by Epstein to shape press coverage. Taken together, the documents suggest a pattern in which Epstein leveraged relationships with influential figures not just for access, but to potentially gain leverage over their operations and decision-making.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2026/3/17/epstein-urged-media-mogul-to-give-up-control-of-affairs-citing-health" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein urged media mogul to give up control of affairs, citing health | Business and Economy | Al Jazeera</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72324203</guid><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72324203/mortzuckwemanepsteinfinances.mp3" length="13658950" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/61df0cf5-0a08-49de-9a20-7fe8e49a6149/61df0cf5-0a08-49de-9a20-7fe8e49a6149.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/61df0cf5-0a08-49de-9a20-7fe8e49a6149/61df0cf5-0a08-49de-9a20-7fe8e49a6149.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/61df0cf5-0a08-49de-9a20-7fe8e49a6149/61df0cf5-0a08-49de-9a20-7fe8e49a6149.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Newly released documents show that Jeffrey Epstein urged billionaire media mogul Mortimer Zuckerman to relinquish control over his personal and business affairs, citing concerns about Zuckerman’s health and mental capacity. Epstein reportedly...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Newly released documents show that Jeffrey Epstein urged billionaire media mogul Mortimer Zuckerman to relinquish control over his personal and business affairs, citing concerns about Zuckerman’s health and mental capacity. Epstein reportedly suggested that Zuckerman consider entering a form of guardianship or conservatorship, positioning himself as someone capable of helping manage or influence those affairs. The communication reflects the unusually personal and advisory role Epstein attempted to play in the lives of powerful figures within his network.<br /><br />The revelations add to a growing body of evidence showing Epstein’s efforts to exert influence over elite individuals beyond financial dealings, extending into media, personal decision-making, and institutional control. Zuckerman, a prominent media owner, had already been linked to Epstein through prior disclosures showing attempts by Epstein to shape press coverage. Taken together, the documents suggest a pattern in which Epstein leveraged relationships with influential figures not just for access, but to potentially gain leverage over their operations and decision-making.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2026/3/17/epstein-urged-media-mogul-to-give-up-control-of-affairs-citing-health" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein urged media mogul to give up control of affairs, citing health | Business and Economy | Al Jazeera</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>854</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Sarah Kellen Congressional Transcript (Part 2) (6/12/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-sarah-kellen-congressional-transcript-part-2-6-12-26--72489927</link><description><![CDATA[Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein’s operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein’s abuse machine function.<br /><br />The skeptical read is that Kellen’s testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein’s access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein’s criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nPDWYcqxugpod1-b98xuayS-RkUtrcyS/view?pli=1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google Drive</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72489927</guid><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72489927/kellentranscript2.mp3" length="12293895" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c3e68d0a-6bfc-4dcf-9310-1fa663243b4a/c3e68d0a-6bfc-4dcf-9310-1fa663243b4a.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c3e68d0a-6bfc-4dcf-9310-1fa663243b4a/c3e68d0a-6bfc-4dcf-9310-1fa663243b4a.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c3e68d0a-6bfc-4dcf-9310-1fa663243b4a/c3e68d0a-6bfc-4dcf-9310-1fa663243b4a.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein’s operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein’s operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein’s abuse machine function.<br /><br />The skeptical read is that Kellen’s testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein’s access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein’s criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nPDWYcqxugpod1-b98xuayS-RkUtrcyS/view?pli=1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google Drive</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>769</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Sarah Kellen Congressional Transcript (Part 1) (6/12/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-sarah-kellen-congressional-transcript-part-1-6-12-26--72489928</link><description><![CDATA[Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein’s operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein’s abuse machine function.<br /><br />The skeptical read is that Kellen’s testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein’s access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein’s criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nPDWYcqxugpod1-b98xuayS-RkUtrcyS/view?pli=1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google Drive</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72489928</guid><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 18:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72489928/kellentranscript1.mp3" length="19761572" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/51ebe09f-d538-4d16-9622-82bc1cbc6e57/51ebe09f-d538-4d16-9622-82bc1cbc6e57.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/51ebe09f-d538-4d16-9622-82bc1cbc6e57/51ebe09f-d538-4d16-9622-82bc1cbc6e57.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/51ebe09f-d538-4d16-9622-82bc1cbc6e57/51ebe09f-d538-4d16-9622-82bc1cbc6e57.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein’s operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein’s operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein’s abuse machine function.<br /><br />The skeptical read is that Kellen’s testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein’s access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein’s criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nPDWYcqxugpod1-b98xuayS-RkUtrcyS/view?pli=1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google Drive</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1236</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Wall Street Journal Moves to Dismiss Trump’s Epstein Letter Lawsuit (6/12/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/wall-street-journal-moves-to-dismiss-trump-s-epstein-letter-lawsuit-6-12-26--72489917</link><description><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal asked a federal judge to dismiss Donald Trump’s revised defamation lawsuit over its reporting on a sexually suggestive birthday letter allegedly sent to Jeffrey Epstein. Trump sued Dow Jones, News Corp, Rupert Murdoch, and others after the Journal reported that a 2003 birthday album compiled for Epstein included a letter bearing Trump’s name. Trump denies writing it and claims the story was false and defamatory, but a federal judge already dismissed the earlier version of the lawsuit because Trump failed to plausibly show actual malice, the demanding legal standard public figures must meet in defamation cases. Trump then filed an amended complaint, arguing in part that Murdoch had told him he would “handle” the matter before publication, but the Journal says the revised lawsuit still does not fix the legal defects.<br /><br />The Journal’s dismissal motion argues that Trump’s new complaint mostly repackages claims the court already rejected and still fails to show that the outlet knowingly published false information or acted with reckless disregard for the truth. The Journal says it accurately reported the existence of the letter, included Trump’s denial, and conducted reporting steps before publication, including seeking comment. It also asks the court to dismiss the case with prejudice and seeks legal fees under Florida’s anti-SLAPP law, casting the lawsuit as an attempt to punish or intimidate protected journalism. In plain terms, Trump is trying to keep the Epstein-letter defamation case alive after an earlier defeat, while the Journal is telling the court that the amended lawsuit is still legally empty and should now be thrown out for good.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://deadline.com/2026/06/trump-wall-street-journal-lawsuit-dismiss-motion-1236953153/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Wall Street Journal Asks Judge To Toss Trump's Revised Lawsuit</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72489917</guid><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72489917/wsjlooksdismisstrumplawsuit.mp3" length="10192814" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/83ddb93c-75bf-4c78-b5df-399bc6a465ed/83ddb93c-75bf-4c78-b5df-399bc6a465ed.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/83ddb93c-75bf-4c78-b5df-399bc6a465ed/83ddb93c-75bf-4c78-b5df-399bc6a465ed.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/83ddb93c-75bf-4c78-b5df-399bc6a465ed/83ddb93c-75bf-4c78-b5df-399bc6a465ed.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Wall Street Journal asked a federal judge to dismiss Donald Trump’s revised defamation lawsuit over its reporting on a sexually suggestive birthday letter allegedly sent to Jeffrey Epstein. Trump sued Dow Jones, News Corp, Rupert Murdoch, and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal asked a federal judge to dismiss Donald Trump’s revised defamation lawsuit over its reporting on a sexually suggestive birthday letter allegedly sent to Jeffrey Epstein. Trump sued Dow Jones, News Corp, Rupert Murdoch, and others after the Journal reported that a 2003 birthday album compiled for Epstein included a letter bearing Trump’s name. Trump denies writing it and claims the story was false and defamatory, but a federal judge already dismissed the earlier version of the lawsuit because Trump failed to plausibly show actual malice, the demanding legal standard public figures must meet in defamation cases. Trump then filed an amended complaint, arguing in part that Murdoch had told him he would “handle” the matter before publication, but the Journal says the revised lawsuit still does not fix the legal defects.<br /><br />The Journal’s dismissal motion argues that Trump’s new complaint mostly repackages claims the court already rejected and still fails to show that the outlet knowingly published false information or acted with reckless disregard for the truth. The Journal says it accurately reported the existence of the letter, included Trump’s denial, and conducted reporting steps before publication, including seeking comment. It also asks the court to dismiss the case with prejudice and seeks legal fees under Florida’s anti-SLAPP law, casting the lawsuit as an attempt to punish or intimidate protected journalism. In plain terms, Trump is trying to keep the Epstein-letter defamation case alive after an earlier defeat, while the Journal is telling the court that the amended lawsuit is still legally empty and should now be thrown out for good.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://deadline.com/2026/06/trump-wall-street-journal-lawsuit-dismiss-motion-1236953153/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Wall Street Journal Asks Judge To Toss Trump's Revised Lawsuit</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>638</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Lesley Groff Tells Congress Epstein "Kept Her in the Dark." (6/12/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/lesley-groff-tells-congress-epstein-kept-her-in-the-dark-6-12-26--72489916</link><description><![CDATA[Lesley Groff told Congress that Jeffrey Epstein was a “monster” and a “master manipulator,” but insisted she did not know he was running a sex-trafficking operation while she worked as his longtime executive secretary. In her closed-door interview with the House Oversight Committee, Groff said she believes Epstein’s victims, but argued that Epstein hid his crimes from her because he had every reason to keep her in the dark and no leverage over her that would have made her stay silent. She maintained that if she had known girls and young women were being abused through the massage appointments and travel logistics she helped arrange, she would not have ignored it. Groff also said she has faced harassment and death threats since Epstein’s 2019 arrest, presenting herself as someone who has been publicly blamed for crimes she claims she neither knew about nor participated in.<br /><br />The problem for Groff is that her denial sits against the scale of her role in Epstein’s daily operation. She worked for him for more than 18 years, was described by Epstein as an “extension of my brain,” scheduled his meetings, booked his frequent massages, arranged travel for women connected to him, and was listed as a potential co-conspirator in the 2007 non-prosecution agreement. Federal prosecutors previously said numerous victims identified her as responsible for scheduling massages during which they were abused, and survivor Marina Lacerda has described Groff as a conduit to Epstein, saying anything involving Epstein had to go through her. Groff’s testimony, then, amounted to a direct attempt to separate administrative involvement from criminal knowledge: she admitted she helped run the machinery around Epstein, but denied knowing what that machinery was being used for.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/09/politics/epstein-assistant-lesley-groff-house-oversight" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Longtime Epstein assistant paints late sex offender as master manipulator and denies knowing about his crimes | CNN Politics</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72489916</guid><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72489916/grofftestimonyrecap.mp3" length="10699381" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/dcc7546e-4bcb-4d4e-b587-3da2634dbc66/dcc7546e-4bcb-4d4e-b587-3da2634dbc66.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/dcc7546e-4bcb-4d4e-b587-3da2634dbc66/dcc7546e-4bcb-4d4e-b587-3da2634dbc66.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/dcc7546e-4bcb-4d4e-b587-3da2634dbc66/dcc7546e-4bcb-4d4e-b587-3da2634dbc66.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Lesley Groff told Congress that Jeffrey Epstein was a “monster” and a “master manipulator,” but insisted she did not know he was running a sex-trafficking operation while she worked as his longtime executive secretary. In her closed-door interview...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Lesley Groff told Congress that Jeffrey Epstein was a “monster” and a “master manipulator,” but insisted she did not know he was running a sex-trafficking operation while she worked as his longtime executive secretary. In her closed-door interview with the House Oversight Committee, Groff said she believes Epstein’s victims, but argued that Epstein hid his crimes from her because he had every reason to keep her in the dark and no leverage over her that would have made her stay silent. She maintained that if she had known girls and young women were being abused through the massage appointments and travel logistics she helped arrange, she would not have ignored it. Groff also said she has faced harassment and death threats since Epstein’s 2019 arrest, presenting herself as someone who has been publicly blamed for crimes she claims she neither knew about nor participated in.<br /><br />The problem for Groff is that her denial sits against the scale of her role in Epstein’s daily operation. She worked for him for more than 18 years, was described by Epstein as an “extension of my brain,” scheduled his meetings, booked his frequent massages, arranged travel for women connected to him, and was listed as a potential co-conspirator in the 2007 non-prosecution agreement. Federal prosecutors previously said numerous victims identified her as responsible for scheduling massages during which they were abused, and survivor Marina Lacerda has described Groff as a conduit to Epstein, saying anything involving Epstein had to go through her. Groff’s testimony, then, amounted to a direct attempt to separate administrative involvement from criminal knowledge: she admitted she helped run the machinery around Epstein, but denied knowing what that machinery was being used for.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/09/politics/epstein-assistant-lesley-groff-house-oversight" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Longtime Epstein assistant paints late sex offender as master manipulator and denies knowing about his crimes | CNN Politics</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>669</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Bill Gates Tells Congress That Epstein Tried to Blackmail Him (6/12/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/bill-gates-tells-congress-that-epstein-tried-to-blackmail-him-6-12-26--72489915</link><description><![CDATA[Bill Gates arrived on Capitol Hill for a closed-door, transcribed interview with the House Oversight Committee as lawmakers continued digging into Jeffrey Epstein’s network, the government’s handling of the case, and the powerful figures who remained in Epstein’s orbit after his 2008 conviction. Gates told reporters he was there to cooperate and, according to his prepared remarks and subsequent reporting, described his meetings with Epstein as a “grave error in judgment.” He maintained that he never witnessed or participated in Epstein’s criminal conduct, never visited Epstein’s island, and believed at the time that Epstein might help raise money for global health and philanthropic projects. Gates has not been accused of criminal wrongdoing, but his repeated contact with Epstein after Epstein was already a convicted sex offender has remained a major reputational problem.<br /><br />The most explosive part of the interview was Gates’ claim that Epstein tried to use knowledge of Gates’ marital infidelities as leverage to keep him close and pressure him into continued contact. Gates framed Epstein as manipulative and said he now regrets giving Epstein credibility by meeting with him at all, while lawmakers focused on why Epstein was able to keep attracting access to billionaires, institutions, and philanthropic circles long after his criminal history was public. The hearing placed Gates inside the broader congressional effort to map Epstein’s influence network, including who met with him, who benefited from his access, and how he used proximity to elite figures to rehabilitate himself. In plain terms, Gates tried to present himself as someone Epstein misled and tried to exploit, while Congress used the interview to examine how someone like Epstein kept buying legitimacy through powerful people.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://nypost.com/2026/06/10/us-news/bill-gates-arrives-on-capitol-hill-for-closed-door-jeffrey-epstein-interview/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bill Gates arrives on Capitol Hill for closed door Jeffrey Epstein interview</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72489915</guid><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 12:56:50 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72489915/gatessaysepsteinblackmailedhim.mp3" length="15956471" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/17c5c237-5a31-4597-8938-d4ef6d923097/17c5c237-5a31-4597-8938-d4ef6d923097.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/17c5c237-5a31-4597-8938-d4ef6d923097/17c5c237-5a31-4597-8938-d4ef6d923097.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/17c5c237-5a31-4597-8938-d4ef6d923097/17c5c237-5a31-4597-8938-d4ef6d923097.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Bill Gates arrived on Capitol Hill for a closed-door, transcribed interview with the House Oversight Committee as lawmakers continued digging into Jeffrey Epstein’s network, the government’s handling of the case, and the powerful figures who remained...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Bill Gates arrived on Capitol Hill for a closed-door, transcribed interview with the House Oversight Committee as lawmakers continued digging into Jeffrey Epstein’s network, the government’s handling of the case, and the powerful figures who remained in Epstein’s orbit after his 2008 conviction. Gates told reporters he was there to cooperate and, according to his prepared remarks and subsequent reporting, described his meetings with Epstein as a “grave error in judgment.” He maintained that he never witnessed or participated in Epstein’s criminal conduct, never visited Epstein’s island, and believed at the time that Epstein might help raise money for global health and philanthropic projects. Gates has not been accused of criminal wrongdoing, but his repeated contact with Epstein after Epstein was already a convicted sex offender has remained a major reputational problem.<br /><br />The most explosive part of the interview was Gates’ claim that Epstein tried to use knowledge of Gates’ marital infidelities as leverage to keep him close and pressure him into continued contact. Gates framed Epstein as manipulative and said he now regrets giving Epstein credibility by meeting with him at all, while lawmakers focused on why Epstein was able to keep attracting access to billionaires, institutions, and philanthropic circles long after his criminal history was public. The hearing placed Gates inside the broader congressional effort to map Epstein’s influence network, including who met with him, who benefited from his access, and how he used proximity to elite figures to rehabilitate himself. In plain terms, Gates tried to present himself as someone Epstein misled and tried to exploit, while Congress used the interview to examine how someone like Epstein kept buying legitimacy through powerful people.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://nypost.com/2026/06/10/us-news/bill-gates-arrives-on-capitol-hill-for-closed-door-jeffrey-epstein-interview/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bill Gates arrives on Capitol Hill for closed door Jeffrey Epstein interview</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>998</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The Southern District Of Florida Was Compromised From The Start (6/12/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-southern-district-of-florida-was-compromised-from-the-start-6-12-26--72483068</link><description><![CDATA[The Southern District of Florida’s handling of Epstein looks even worse when you follow what happened after the sweetheart deal machinery was already moving. This was not just a case where powerful defense lawyers outmaneuvered a federal office; it became a revolving-door story, where people connected to the very office responsible for scrutinizing Epstein later ended up in orbit around Epstein, his employees, or firms tied to his legal defense. Matthew Menchel, the former chief criminal prosecutor in the South Florida U.S. Attorney’s Office who helped spearhead the federal case, left DOJ in 2007 before the non-prosecution agreement was finalized and went to Kobre &amp; Kim; later records showed multiple dinners, meetings, and contacts between Menchel and Epstein years after the deal. Bruce Reinhart, another former assistant U.S. attorney in the same district, left the office at the start of 2008 and almost immediately began representing Epstein employees, including people who had been identified in the broader Epstein investigation.<br /><br />That is the heart of the problem: the same federal system that should have walled itself off from Epstein’s influence instead produced a pipeline of former insiders who either represented Epstein-adjacent figures, joined firms connected to his interests, or maintained relationships that created the appearance of serious conflict. The DOJ’s Office of Professional Responsibility later reviewed the Florida deal and did not find professional misconduct, but it still concluded that Epstein’s victims were not treated with the forthrightness and sensitivity expected from the Department, which only underscores how badly the process failed them. When prosecutors leave public service and then quickly appear on the other side of a case like this, it feeds the suspicion that Epstein was not merely defended by expensive lawyers, but protected by proximity, access, and relationships. In a case already defined by secrecy, immunity language, hidden negotiations, and ignored survivors, that revolving door became one more reason people believe the Southern District of Florida did not just mishandle Epstein — it became part of the architecture that allowed him to survive accountability.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72483068</guid><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72483068/megafloridadojofficecompromised.mp3" length="53406868" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/42c4a171-9443-4802-b776-229874492682/42c4a171-9443-4802-b776-229874492682.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/42c4a171-9443-4802-b776-229874492682/42c4a171-9443-4802-b776-229874492682.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/42c4a171-9443-4802-b776-229874492682/42c4a171-9443-4802-b776-229874492682.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Southern District of Florida’s handling of Epstein looks even worse when you follow what happened after the sweetheart deal machinery was already moving. This was not just a case where powerful defense lawyers outmaneuvered a federal office; it...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Southern District of Florida’s handling of Epstein looks even worse when you follow what happened after the sweetheart deal machinery was already moving. This was not just a case where powerful defense lawyers outmaneuvered a federal office; it became a revolving-door story, where people connected to the very office responsible for scrutinizing Epstein later ended up in orbit around Epstein, his employees, or firms tied to his legal defense. Matthew Menchel, the former chief criminal prosecutor in the South Florida U.S. Attorney’s Office who helped spearhead the federal case, left DOJ in 2007 before the non-prosecution agreement was finalized and went to Kobre &amp; Kim; later records showed multiple dinners, meetings, and contacts between Menchel and Epstein years after the deal. Bruce Reinhart, another former assistant U.S. attorney in the same district, left the office at the start of 2008 and almost immediately began representing Epstein employees, including people who had been identified in the broader Epstein investigation.<br /><br />That is the heart of the problem: the same federal system that should have walled itself off from Epstein’s influence instead produced a pipeline of former insiders who either represented Epstein-adjacent figures, joined firms connected to his interests, or maintained relationships that created the appearance of serious conflict. The DOJ’s Office of Professional Responsibility later reviewed the Florida deal and did not find professional misconduct, but it still concluded that Epstein’s victims were not treated with the forthrightness and sensitivity expected from the Department, which only underscores how badly the process failed them. When prosecutors leave public service and then quickly appear on the other side of a case like this, it feeds the suspicion that Epstein was not merely defended by expensive lawyers, but protected by proximity, access, and relationships. In a case already defined by secrecy, immunity language, hidden negotiations, and ignored survivors, that revolving door became one more reason people believe the Southern District of Florida did not just mishandle Epstein — it became part of the architecture that allowed him to survive accountability.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3338</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   Even After Epstein's First Arrest The Invites Kept Rolling In (6/12/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-even-after-epstein-s-first-arrest-the-invites-kept-rolling-in-6-12-26--72483062</link><description><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell were not treated like radioactive outcasts after Epstein’s first arrest; in many elite circles, they were still welcomed, tolerated, or quietly absorbed back into the social machinery of high society. Epstein’s 2006 arrest and 2008 conviction should have made him untouchable, but money, access, famous friends, private jets, philanthropy, and the protective manners of the ultra-wealthy helped soften the consequences. Maxwell, especially, remained a social bridge: polished, connected, fluent in the language of aristocrats, billionaires, academics, royals, and political insiders. She could move through rooms where Epstein himself might have been more awkward or conspicuous, and her presence helped normalize him even after the public record showed he was a convicted sex offender.<br /><br />That is what makes their post-arrest social access so damning. These were not obscure figures hiding on the margins; they were people with visible ties to royalty, finance, science, media, politics, and elite philanthropy, and many around them chose convenience over conscience. Invitations, dinners, conferences, private gatherings, and introductions continued because Epstein still had something powerful people valued: money, connections, mystique, and proximity to other powerful people. Maxwell helped launder that access socially, presenting Epstein’s world as glamorous, exclusive, and useful rather than predatory. In the end, their continued welcome in high society showed how elite networks can function as insulation, turning scandal into gossip, criminality into inconvenience, and victims into background noise.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72483062</guid><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72483062/megaepsteinmaxwellparties.mp3" length="50953866" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/37cce1aa-5e05-4581-96d4-a7a6038552d0/37cce1aa-5e05-4581-96d4-a7a6038552d0.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/37cce1aa-5e05-4581-96d4-a7a6038552d0/37cce1aa-5e05-4581-96d4-a7a6038552d0.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/37cce1aa-5e05-4581-96d4-a7a6038552d0/37cce1aa-5e05-4581-96d4-a7a6038552d0.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell were not treated like radioactive outcasts after Epstein’s first arrest; in many elite circles, they were still welcomed, tolerated, or quietly absorbed back into the social machinery of high society. Epstein’s...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell were not treated like radioactive outcasts after Epstein’s first arrest; in many elite circles, they were still welcomed, tolerated, or quietly absorbed back into the social machinery of high society. Epstein’s 2006 arrest and 2008 conviction should have made him untouchable, but money, access, famous friends, private jets, philanthropy, and the protective manners of the ultra-wealthy helped soften the consequences. Maxwell, especially, remained a social bridge: polished, connected, fluent in the language of aristocrats, billionaires, academics, royals, and political insiders. She could move through rooms where Epstein himself might have been more awkward or conspicuous, and her presence helped normalize him even after the public record showed he was a convicted sex offender.<br /><br />That is what makes their post-arrest social access so damning. These were not obscure figures hiding on the margins; they were people with visible ties to royalty, finance, science, media, politics, and elite philanthropy, and many around them chose convenience over conscience. Invitations, dinners, conferences, private gatherings, and introductions continued because Epstein still had something powerful people valued: money, connections, mystique, and proximity to other powerful people. Maxwell helped launder that access socially, presenting Epstein’s world as glamorous, exclusive, and useful rather than predatory. In the end, their continued welcome in high society showed how elite networks can function as insulation, turning scandal into gossip, criminality into inconvenience, and victims into background noise.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3185</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The Competing Narratives Surrounding Epstein's Jail House "Incident" (6/11/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-competing-narratives-surrounding-epstein-s-jail-house-incident-6-11-26--72483061</link><description><![CDATA[David Schoen was one of the lawyers Jeffrey Epstein consulted near the end of his life, and his account matters because he says Epstein personally denied that the July 2019 neck-injury incident at the Metropolitan Correctional Center was a suicide attempt. According to Schoen, Epstein told him that his cellmate, Nicholas Tartaglione, had caused the injury during what was described as some kind of “experiment,” “prank,” or jailhouse incident involving something placed around Epstein’s neck. Schoen has said Epstein claimed he stayed quiet because he did not want to be labeled suicidal and placed under the restrictions that would come with suicide watch.<br /><br />The Tartaglione claim remains one of the murkier pieces of the Epstein jail timeline because the accounts shifted. Reporting and later records indicate Epstein initially blamed Tartaglione for the injuries, then later walked that back during an internal prison interview, saying he did not feel threatened and attributing the episode to insomnia or distress. Tartaglione has repeatedly denied harming Epstein, and an internal prison investigation reportedly cleared him of responsibility, but the episode still matters because it raises obvious questions about MCC supervision, the handling of Epstein’s mental-health status, and why a detainee with Epstein’s profile was left in such a volatile and poorly monitored environment in the first place.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72483061</guid><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72483061/megaepsteinschoen.mp3" length="59252893" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c741e4e0-34f1-499a-9539-abf4b8a0d89b/c741e4e0-34f1-499a-9539-abf4b8a0d89b.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c741e4e0-34f1-499a-9539-abf4b8a0d89b/c741e4e0-34f1-499a-9539-abf4b8a0d89b.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c741e4e0-34f1-499a-9539-abf4b8a0d89b/c741e4e0-34f1-499a-9539-abf4b8a0d89b.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>David Schoen was one of the lawyers Jeffrey Epstein consulted near the end of his life, and his account matters because he says Epstein personally denied that the July 2019 neck-injury incident at the Metropolitan Correctional Center was a suicide...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[David Schoen was one of the lawyers Jeffrey Epstein consulted near the end of his life, and his account matters because he says Epstein personally denied that the July 2019 neck-injury incident at the Metropolitan Correctional Center was a suicide attempt. According to Schoen, Epstein told him that his cellmate, Nicholas Tartaglione, had caused the injury during what was described as some kind of “experiment,” “prank,” or jailhouse incident involving something placed around Epstein’s neck. Schoen has said Epstein claimed he stayed quiet because he did not want to be labeled suicidal and placed under the restrictions that would come with suicide watch.<br /><br />The Tartaglione claim remains one of the murkier pieces of the Epstein jail timeline because the accounts shifted. Reporting and later records indicate Epstein initially blamed Tartaglione for the injuries, then later walked that back during an internal prison interview, saying he did not feel threatened and attributing the episode to insomnia or distress. Tartaglione has repeatedly denied harming Epstein, and an internal prison investigation reportedly cleared him of responsibility, but the episode still matters because it raises obvious questions about MCC supervision, the handling of Epstein’s mental-health status, and why a detainee with Epstein’s profile was left in such a volatile and poorly monitored environment in the first place.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3704</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Virginia Robert's Rejects  Ghislaine Maxwell's Summary Judgement Push (Part 8)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/virginia-robert-s-rejects-ghislaine-maxwell-s-summary-judgement-push-part-8--72460835</link><description><![CDATA[Virginia Giuffre’s response to Ghislaine Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell’s attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell’s statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre’s legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein’s trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.<br /><br />Virginia Giuffre’s response to Ghislaine Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell’s attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell’s statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre’s legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein’s trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Giuffre-unseal.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Giuffre-unseal.pdf (courthousenews.com)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72460835</guid><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 04:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72460835/vrobrespsum8.mp3" length="14438025" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b2580456-9baf-46cf-901c-1a81b816bf14/b2580456-9baf-46cf-901c-1a81b816bf14.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b2580456-9baf-46cf-901c-1a81b816bf14/b2580456-9baf-46cf-901c-1a81b816bf14.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b2580456-9baf-46cf-901c-1a81b816bf14/b2580456-9baf-46cf-901c-1a81b816bf14.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Virginia Giuffre’s response to Ghislaine Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell’s attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell’s statements denying any wrongdoing were not...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Virginia Giuffre’s response to Ghislaine Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell’s attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell’s statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre’s legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein’s trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.<br /><br />Virginia Giuffre’s response to Ghislaine Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell’s attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell’s statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre’s legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein’s trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Giuffre-unseal.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Giuffre-unseal.pdf (courthousenews.com)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>903</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Virginia Robert's Rejects  Ghislaine Maxwell's Summary Judgement Push (Part 7)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/virginia-robert-s-rejects-ghislaine-maxwell-s-summary-judgement-push-part-7--72460832</link><description><![CDATA[Virginia Giuffre’s response to Ghislaine Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell’s attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell’s statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre’s legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein’s trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.<br /><br />Virginia Giuffre’s response to Ghislaine Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell’s attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell’s statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre’s legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein’s trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Giuffre-unseal.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Giuffre-unseal.pdf (courthousenews.com)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72460832</guid><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 02:50:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72460832/vrobrespsum7.mp3" length="10777538" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3248969d-0a20-4a42-b7b7-b4ef43f41003/3248969d-0a20-4a42-b7b7-b4ef43f41003.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3248969d-0a20-4a42-b7b7-b4ef43f41003/3248969d-0a20-4a42-b7b7-b4ef43f41003.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3248969d-0a20-4a42-b7b7-b4ef43f41003/3248969d-0a20-4a42-b7b7-b4ef43f41003.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Virginia Giuffre’s response to Ghislaine Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell’s attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell’s statements denying any wrongdoing were not...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Virginia Giuffre’s response to Ghislaine Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell’s attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell’s statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre’s legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein’s trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.<br /><br />Virginia Giuffre’s response to Ghislaine Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell’s attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell’s statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre’s legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein’s trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Giuffre-unseal.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Giuffre-unseal.pdf (courthousenews.com)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>674</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Virginia Robert's Rejects  Ghislaine Maxwell's Summary Judgement Push (Part 6)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/virginia-robert-s-rejects-ghislaine-maxwell-s-summary-judgement-push-part-6--72460833</link><description><![CDATA[Virginia Giuffre’s response to Ghislaine Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell’s attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell’s statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre’s legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein’s trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.<br /><br />Virginia Giuffre’s response to Ghislaine Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell’s attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell’s statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre’s legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein’s trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Giuffre-unseal.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Giuffre-unseal.pdf (courthousenews.com)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72460833</guid><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 00:45:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72460833/vrobrespsum6.mp3" length="16692496" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1b9179f8-7c41-49e8-b54e-59898f3f9ac5/1b9179f8-7c41-49e8-b54e-59898f3f9ac5.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1b9179f8-7c41-49e8-b54e-59898f3f9ac5/1b9179f8-7c41-49e8-b54e-59898f3f9ac5.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1b9179f8-7c41-49e8-b54e-59898f3f9ac5/1b9179f8-7c41-49e8-b54e-59898f3f9ac5.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Virginia Giuffre’s response to Ghislaine Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell’s attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell’s statements denying any wrongdoing were not...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Virginia Giuffre’s response to Ghislaine Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell’s attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell’s statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre’s legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein’s trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.<br /><br />Virginia Giuffre’s response to Ghislaine Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell’s attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell’s statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre’s legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein’s trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Giuffre-unseal.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Giuffre-unseal.pdf (courthousenews.com)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1044</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Virginia Robert's Rejects  Ghislaine Maxwell's Summary Judgement Push (Part 5)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/virginia-robert-s-rejects-ghislaine-maxwell-s-summary-judgement-push-part-5--72460837</link><description><![CDATA[Virginia Giuffre’s response to Ghislaine Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell’s attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell’s statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre’s legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein’s trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.<br /><br />Virginia Giuffre’s response to Ghislaine Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell’s attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell’s statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre’s legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein’s trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Giuffre-unseal.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Giuffre-unseal.pdf (courthousenews.com)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72460837</guid><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 22:42:14 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72460837/vrobrespsum5.mp3" length="13804398" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7e272ed7-81b9-45dc-a727-0698d9e90365/7e272ed7-81b9-45dc-a727-0698d9e90365.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7e272ed7-81b9-45dc-a727-0698d9e90365/7e272ed7-81b9-45dc-a727-0698d9e90365.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7e272ed7-81b9-45dc-a727-0698d9e90365/7e272ed7-81b9-45dc-a727-0698d9e90365.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Virginia Giuffre’s response to Ghislaine Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell’s attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell’s statements denying any wrongdoing were not...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Virginia Giuffre’s response to Ghislaine Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell’s attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell’s statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre’s legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein’s trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.<br /><br />Virginia Giuffre’s response to Ghislaine Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell’s attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell’s statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre’s legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein’s trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Giuffre-unseal.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Giuffre-unseal.pdf (courthousenews.com)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>863</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Inside the White House Fallout Over the Epstein Files (Part 3) (6/11/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/inside-the-white-house-fallout-over-the-epstein-files-part-3-6-11-26--72463083</link><description><![CDATA[The Trump administration’s handling of the Epstein files has become a political disaster because years of promises about transparency ran headfirst into the Justice Department’s refusal to back the most explosive public expectations. Senior White House officials, including Vice President JD Vance, reportedly gathered without Trump in the Situation Room to manage the fallout after the DOJ and FBI said there was no “client list,” no confirmed blackmail operation, and that Epstein’s death was a suicide. That answer did not calm anything down. It infuriated survivors, transparency advocates, Democrats, and a large part of Trump’s own base, many of whom believed the administration had promised to expose the people Epstein protected, served, or compromised.<br /><br />The larger problem is that Epstein remains a trust-destroying scandal because the public has never believed the government gave a full accounting of who enabled him, who benefited from him, and who was protected when the system closed ranks. The White House tried to contain the issue, but the response only deepened the perception that powerful names were still being shielded. With Congress continuing to demand answers, major figures like Bill Gates being pulled into closed-door questioning, and polling showing broad public skepticism, the Epstein files have become more than a legal matter. They are now a political grenade, exposing the gap between campaign promises, institutional self-protection, and the public’s belief that elite accountability is still mostly theater.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/10/magazine/trump-epstein-files-white-house-vance-doj.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Inside Trump’s White House, the Epstein Files Caused a Freakout - The New York Times</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72463083</guid><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72463083/whitehousetrumpepstein3.mp3" length="28899413" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9b4a56bd-afb3-489d-81cd-2d8bc8c56953/9b4a56bd-afb3-489d-81cd-2d8bc8c56953.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9b4a56bd-afb3-489d-81cd-2d8bc8c56953/9b4a56bd-afb3-489d-81cd-2d8bc8c56953.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9b4a56bd-afb3-489d-81cd-2d8bc8c56953/9b4a56bd-afb3-489d-81cd-2d8bc8c56953.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Trump administration’s handling of the Epstein files has become a political disaster because years of promises about transparency ran headfirst into the Justice Department’s refusal to back the most explosive public expectations. Senior White...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Trump administration’s handling of the Epstein files has become a political disaster because years of promises about transparency ran headfirst into the Justice Department’s refusal to back the most explosive public expectations. Senior White House officials, including Vice President JD Vance, reportedly gathered without Trump in the Situation Room to manage the fallout after the DOJ and FBI said there was no “client list,” no confirmed blackmail operation, and that Epstein’s death was a suicide. That answer did not calm anything down. It infuriated survivors, transparency advocates, Democrats, and a large part of Trump’s own base, many of whom believed the administration had promised to expose the people Epstein protected, served, or compromised.<br /><br />The larger problem is that Epstein remains a trust-destroying scandal because the public has never believed the government gave a full accounting of who enabled him, who benefited from him, and who was protected when the system closed ranks. The White House tried to contain the issue, but the response only deepened the perception that powerful names were still being shielded. With Congress continuing to demand answers, major figures like Bill Gates being pulled into closed-door questioning, and polling showing broad public skepticism, the Epstein files have become more than a legal matter. They are now a political grenade, exposing the gap between campaign promises, institutional self-protection, and the public’s belief that elite accountability is still mostly theater.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/10/magazine/trump-epstein-files-white-house-vance-doj.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Inside Trump’s White House, the Epstein Files Caused a Freakout - The New York Times</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1807</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Inside the White House Fallout Over the Epstein Files (Part 2) (6/11/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/inside-the-white-house-fallout-over-the-epstein-files-part-2-6-11-26--72463084</link><description><![CDATA[The Trump administration’s handling of the Epstein files has become a political disaster because years of promises about transparency ran headfirst into the Justice Department’s refusal to back the most explosive public expectations. Senior White House officials, including Vice President JD Vance, reportedly gathered without Trump in the Situation Room to manage the fallout after the DOJ and FBI said there was no “client list,” no confirmed blackmail operation, and that Epstein’s death was a suicide. That answer did not calm anything down. It infuriated survivors, transparency advocates, Democrats, and a large part of Trump’s own base, many of whom believed the administration had promised to expose the people Epstein protected, served, or compromised.<br /><br />The larger problem is that Epstein remains a trust-destroying scandal because the public has never believed the government gave a full accounting of who enabled him, who benefited from him, and who was protected when the system closed ranks. The White House tried to contain the issue, but the response only deepened the perception that powerful names were still being shielded. With Congress continuing to demand answers, major figures like Bill Gates being pulled into closed-door questioning, and polling showing broad public skepticism, the Epstein files have become more than a legal matter. They are now a political grenade, exposing the gap between campaign promises, institutional self-protection, and the public’s belief that elite accountability is still mostly theater.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/10/magazine/trump-epstein-files-white-house-vance-doj.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Inside Trump’s White House, the Epstein Files Caused a Freakout - The New York Times</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72463084</guid><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 18:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72463084/whitehousetrumpepstein2.mp3" length="20762584" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/96b31434-7fbd-43c4-a10e-8ca4874e7f83/96b31434-7fbd-43c4-a10e-8ca4874e7f83.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/96b31434-7fbd-43c4-a10e-8ca4874e7f83/96b31434-7fbd-43c4-a10e-8ca4874e7f83.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/96b31434-7fbd-43c4-a10e-8ca4874e7f83/96b31434-7fbd-43c4-a10e-8ca4874e7f83.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Trump administration’s handling of the Epstein files has become a political disaster because years of promises about transparency ran headfirst into the Justice Department’s refusal to back the most explosive public expectations. Senior White...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Trump administration’s handling of the Epstein files has become a political disaster because years of promises about transparency ran headfirst into the Justice Department’s refusal to back the most explosive public expectations. Senior White House officials, including Vice President JD Vance, reportedly gathered without Trump in the Situation Room to manage the fallout after the DOJ and FBI said there was no “client list,” no confirmed blackmail operation, and that Epstein’s death was a suicide. That answer did not calm anything down. It infuriated survivors, transparency advocates, Democrats, and a large part of Trump’s own base, many of whom believed the administration had promised to expose the people Epstein protected, served, or compromised.<br /><br />The larger problem is that Epstein remains a trust-destroying scandal because the public has never believed the government gave a full accounting of who enabled him, who benefited from him, and who was protected when the system closed ranks. The White House tried to contain the issue, but the response only deepened the perception that powerful names were still being shielded. With Congress continuing to demand answers, major figures like Bill Gates being pulled into closed-door questioning, and polling showing broad public skepticism, the Epstein files have become more than a legal matter. They are now a political grenade, exposing the gap between campaign promises, institutional self-protection, and the public’s belief that elite accountability is still mostly theater.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/10/magazine/trump-epstein-files-white-house-vance-doj.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Inside Trump’s White House, the Epstein Files Caused a Freakout - The New York Times</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1298</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Inside the White House Fallout Over the Epstein Files (Part 1) (6/11/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/inside-the-white-house-fallout-over-the-epstein-files-part-1-6-11-26--72463085</link><description><![CDATA[The Trump administration’s handling of the Epstein files has become a political disaster because years of promises about transparency ran headfirst into the Justice Department’s refusal to back the most explosive public expectations. Senior White House officials, including Vice President JD Vance, reportedly gathered without Trump in the Situation Room to manage the fallout after the DOJ and FBI said there was no “client list,” no confirmed blackmail operation, and that Epstein’s death was a suicide. That answer did not calm anything down. It infuriated survivors, transparency advocates, Democrats, and a large part of Trump’s own base, many of whom believed the administration had promised to expose the people Epstein protected, served, or compromised.<br /><br />The larger problem is that Epstein remains a trust-destroying scandal because the public has never believed the government gave a full accounting of who enabled him, who benefited from him, and who was protected when the system closed ranks. The White House tried to contain the issue, but the response only deepened the perception that powerful names were still being shielded. With Congress continuing to demand answers, major figures like Bill Gates being pulled into closed-door questioning, and polling showing broad public skepticism, the Epstein files have become more than a legal matter. They are now a political grenade, exposing the gap between campaign promises, institutional self-protection, and the public’s belief that elite accountability is still mostly theater.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/10/magazine/trump-epstein-files-white-house-vance-doj.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Inside Trump’s White House, the Epstein Files Caused a Freakout - The New York Times</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72463085</guid><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72463085/whitehousetrumpepstein1.mp3" length="19579759" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/aba12c49-a7b7-4713-9895-b503892d01d7/aba12c49-a7b7-4713-9895-b503892d01d7.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/aba12c49-a7b7-4713-9895-b503892d01d7/aba12c49-a7b7-4713-9895-b503892d01d7.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/aba12c49-a7b7-4713-9895-b503892d01d7/aba12c49-a7b7-4713-9895-b503892d01d7.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Trump administration’s handling of the Epstein files has become a political disaster because years of promises about transparency ran headfirst into the Justice Department’s refusal to back the most explosive public expectations. Senior White...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Trump administration’s handling of the Epstein files has become a political disaster because years of promises about transparency ran headfirst into the Justice Department’s refusal to back the most explosive public expectations. Senior White House officials, including Vice President JD Vance, reportedly gathered without Trump in the Situation Room to manage the fallout after the DOJ and FBI said there was no “client list,” no confirmed blackmail operation, and that Epstein’s death was a suicide. That answer did not calm anything down. It infuriated survivors, transparency advocates, Democrats, and a large part of Trump’s own base, many of whom believed the administration had promised to expose the people Epstein protected, served, or compromised.<br /><br />The larger problem is that Epstein remains a trust-destroying scandal because the public has never believed the government gave a full accounting of who enabled him, who benefited from him, and who was protected when the system closed ranks. The White House tried to contain the issue, but the response only deepened the perception that powerful names were still being shielded. With Congress continuing to demand answers, major figures like Bill Gates being pulled into closed-door questioning, and polling showing broad public skepticism, the Epstein files have become more than a legal matter. They are now a political grenade, exposing the gap between campaign promises, institutional self-protection, and the public’s belief that elite accountability is still mostly theater.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/10/magazine/trump-epstein-files-white-house-vance-doj.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Inside Trump’s White House, the Epstein Files Caused a Freakout - The New York Times</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1224</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Tova Noel Breaks Her Silence on Epstein’s Final Night And Blames Systemic Failures (6/11/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/tova-noel-breaks-her-silence-on-epstein-s-final-night-and-blames-systemic-failures-6-11-26--72463086</link><description><![CDATA[Former Metropolitan Correctional Center officer Tova Noel told the House Oversight Committee that her life has been upended by years of threats, harassment, and conspiracy theories tying her to Jeffrey Epstein’s death. She denied playing any role in Epstein’s death or any cover-up, saying she has been accused of being a murderer, threatened by strangers, and followed by rumors that have damaged her health, career, and personal life. Noel acknowledged that she was one of the officers on duty the night Epstein died and that she failed to properly perform required rounds and counts, but she framed that failure as part of the broader dysfunction inside the MCC rather than evidence of a plot. She blamed understaffing, poor training, bad communication from management, and what she called the “MCC Way” for the breakdowns that occurred that night.<br /><br />Noel also rejected specific suspicions that have followed her, including claims that she was the orange-colored figure seen on surveillance near Epstein’s cell or that she had anything to do with a mysterious payment connected to access to Epstein. She said she did not return to Epstein’s tier that night, did not carry or distribute anything orange in the Special Housing Unit, and had no knowledge of who the figure was. Her testimony still leaves the larger questions around Epstein’s death alive because she admitted the basic institutional failures: Epstein was not checked as required, records were falsified, and the jail’s security practices broke down around one of the most high-profile detainees in federal custody. In other words, Noel’s testimony was an attempt to separate incompetence and institutional rot from murder or conspiracy, while critics continue to point to the same gaps—failed cameras, missed rounds, falsified logs, and unexplained footage—as the reason the official story has never satisfied the public.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72463086</guid><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 14:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72463086/tovanoelblamessystemicissues.mp3" length="16181751" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0d27aeb2-e05d-49a8-b589-4d52d771e36f/0d27aeb2-e05d-49a8-b589-4d52d771e36f.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0d27aeb2-e05d-49a8-b589-4d52d771e36f/0d27aeb2-e05d-49a8-b589-4d52d771e36f.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0d27aeb2-e05d-49a8-b589-4d52d771e36f/0d27aeb2-e05d-49a8-b589-4d52d771e36f.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Former Metropolitan Correctional Center officer Tova Noel told the House Oversight Committee that her life has been upended by years of threats, harassment, and conspiracy theories tying her to Jeffrey Epstein’s death. She denied playing any role in...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Former Metropolitan Correctional Center officer Tova Noel told the House Oversight Committee that her life has been upended by years of threats, harassment, and conspiracy theories tying her to Jeffrey Epstein’s death. She denied playing any role in Epstein’s death or any cover-up, saying she has been accused of being a murderer, threatened by strangers, and followed by rumors that have damaged her health, career, and personal life. Noel acknowledged that she was one of the officers on duty the night Epstein died and that she failed to properly perform required rounds and counts, but she framed that failure as part of the broader dysfunction inside the MCC rather than evidence of a plot. She blamed understaffing, poor training, bad communication from management, and what she called the “MCC Way” for the breakdowns that occurred that night.<br /><br />Noel also rejected specific suspicions that have followed her, including claims that she was the orange-colored figure seen on surveillance near Epstein’s cell or that she had anything to do with a mysterious payment connected to access to Epstein. She said she did not return to Epstein’s tier that night, did not carry or distribute anything orange in the Special Housing Unit, and had no knowledge of who the figure was. Her testimony still leaves the larger questions around Epstein’s death alive because she admitted the basic institutional failures: Epstein was not checked as required, records were falsified, and the jail’s security practices broke down around one of the most high-profile detainees in federal custody. In other words, Noel’s testimony was an attempt to separate incompetence and institutional rot from murder or conspiracy, while critics continue to point to the same gaps—failed cameras, missed rounds, falsified logs, and unexplained footage—as the reason the official story has never satisfied the public.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1012</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Pam Bondi Congressional Oversight Committee Epstein Related Transcript (Part 12) (6/10/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-pam-bondi-congressional-oversight-committee-epstein-related-transcript-part-12-6-10-26--72441654</link><description><![CDATA[Pam Bondi’s congressional transcript showed her trying to defend the Justice Department’s handling of the Epstein files while repeatedly distancing herself from the day-to-day mechanics of the review. She told House Oversight lawmakers that Todd Blanche was the official “in charge” of the Epstein records process, saying she did not personally conduct the document review and that the work had been delegated to him. Bondi acknowledged that mistakes were made, including redaction problems, but framed the release as a massive and difficult undertaking rather than a deliberate attempt to obstruct transparency. At the same time, she insisted the department was committed to accountability, even as lawmakers pressed her on why the disclosures remained incomplete, flawed, or slow-moving.<br /><br />The transcript also showed Bondi trying to avoid directly blaming Blanche while making clear that he was the person managing the release. She praised him as ethical and capable, but Democrats seized on her answers as evidence that Blanche, along with other DOJ and FBI officials, should be brought before Congress to explain the process in detail. Bondi also said she learned about Ghislaine Maxwell’s prison transfer from news reports, denied involvement in that decision, rejected the idea of a Maxwell pardon, and refused to discuss private conversations with Donald Trump. The result was a transcript that did not settle the Epstein files controversy, but instead widened the accountability fight by making clear that Congress still does not have a clean answer on who controlled the review, why errors happened, and whether the public has truly received the full record.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Final-Bondi-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Final-Bondi-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72441654</guid><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 12:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72441654/bonditranscripts12.mp3" length="16919449" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/81f2c23c-e820-4def-8fc7-b89574218e55/81f2c23c-e820-4def-8fc7-b89574218e55.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/81f2c23c-e820-4def-8fc7-b89574218e55/81f2c23c-e820-4def-8fc7-b89574218e55.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/81f2c23c-e820-4def-8fc7-b89574218e55/81f2c23c-e820-4def-8fc7-b89574218e55.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Pam Bondi’s congressional transcript showed her trying to defend the Justice Department’s handling of the Epstein files while repeatedly distancing herself from the day-to-day mechanics of the review. She told House Oversight lawmakers that Todd...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Pam Bondi’s congressional transcript showed her trying to defend the Justice Department’s handling of the Epstein files while repeatedly distancing herself from the day-to-day mechanics of the review. She told House Oversight lawmakers that Todd Blanche was the official “in charge” of the Epstein records process, saying she did not personally conduct the document review and that the work had been delegated to him. Bondi acknowledged that mistakes were made, including redaction problems, but framed the release as a massive and difficult undertaking rather than a deliberate attempt to obstruct transparency. At the same time, she insisted the department was committed to accountability, even as lawmakers pressed her on why the disclosures remained incomplete, flawed, or slow-moving.<br /><br />The transcript also showed Bondi trying to avoid directly blaming Blanche while making clear that he was the person managing the release. She praised him as ethical and capable, but Democrats seized on her answers as evidence that Blanche, along with other DOJ and FBI officials, should be brought before Congress to explain the process in detail. Bondi also said she learned about Ghislaine Maxwell’s prison transfer from news reports, denied involvement in that decision, rejected the idea of a Maxwell pardon, and refused to discuss private conversations with Donald Trump. The result was a transcript that did not settle the Epstein files controversy, but instead widened the accountability fight by making clear that Congress still does not have a clean answer on who controlled the review, why errors happened, and whether the public has truly received the full record.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Final-Bondi-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Final-Bondi-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1058</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition: Danielle Bensky And The Lawsuit Filed Against Indyke And Kahn (9-10) (6/11/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-danielle-bensky-and-the-lawsuit-filed-against-indyke-and-kahn-9-10-6-11-26--72462047</link><description><![CDATA[Background of the Lawsuit<br /><ol><li>Defendants:<ul><li>Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn: Both are lawyers who were appointed as co-executors of Jeffrey Epstein’s estate following his death in August 2019. They have been responsible for managing the estate’s affairs, including financial assets and legal claims against Epstein.</li></ul></li><li>Plaintiffs:<ul><li>Danielle Benskey: An alleged victim of Jeffrey Epstein who, along with other plaintiffs, has brought forward claims against the estate.</li><li>Jane Doe 3: Another individual who has accused Epstein of abuse and is seeking justice through the legal system.</li></ul></li></ol>Allegations and Claims<br /><ol><li>Mismanagement and Negligence:<ul><li>Estate Administration: The plaintiffs allege that Indyke and Kahn have mishandled the administration of Epstein’s estate. This includes accusations of mismanagement of financial assets, failure to properly address claims from victims, and overall negligence in managing the estate’s affairs.</li><li>Financial Irregularities: There are claims that the executors may have engaged in or failed to address financial irregularities that negatively impacted the estate’s value and its ability to settle claims.</li></ul></li><li>Failure to Address Victims’ Claims:<ul><li>Inadequate Settlements: The lawsuit argues that Indyke and Kahn did not adequately handle or settle claims made by Epstein’s victims. This includes allegations that they were unresponsive or failed to provide fair compensation to survivors like Benskey and Jane Doe 3.</li><li>Lack of Transparency: The plaintiffs accuse the executors of being opaque about the handling of the estate’s assets and the status of the victims’ claims.</li></ul></li></ol>Legal Proceedings<br /><ol><li>Filing and Court Actions:<ul><li>Lawsuit Details: The lawsuit has been filed in a civil court, where the plaintiffs seek financial damages and other remedies for the alleged mismanagement and failures in addressing their claims.</li><li>Court Hearings: There have been ongoing court hearings and legal maneuvers as the case progresses, including motions, evidence submissions, and testimonies.</li></ul></li><li>Recent Developments:<ul><li>Settlement Talks: There have been discussions and negotiations regarding potential settlements, though the specifics of these talks are not always publicly disclosed.</li><li>Court Orders: The court has issued various orders related to the case, including directives on evidence disclosure and procedural matters.</li></ul></li></ol>Broader Context<br /><ol><li>Epstein’s Estate:<ul><li>Complexity: Jeffrey Epstein’s estate is highly complex, involving significant financial assets, multiple claims from survivors, and legal disputes. The estate’s management has been under scrutiny, given Epstein’s criminal activities and the large number of victims involved.</li><li>Public Scrutiny: The handling of Epstein’s estate, including the actions of Indyke and Kahn, has attracted considerable public and media attention, adding to the pressure on the executors to address the allegations and claims appropriately.</li></ul></li><li>Victims’ Advocacy:<ul><li>Support for Survivors: The lawsuit is part of broader efforts by victims and their advocates to seek justice and accountability for the abuse they endured. It reflects ongoing challenges in achieving fair compensation and redress for survivors of Epstein’s abuse.</li></ul></li></ol><br /><br />(commercial at 8:16)<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://wallstreetonparade.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Bensky-Jane-Doe-3-v-Indyke-Kahn-2024.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Microsoft Word - 2024.02.16 Kahn Indyke Complaint (FINAL) (wallstreetonparade.com)</a><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72462047</guid><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72462047/megaindykekahn9n10.mp3" length="32391462" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8abad1f1-ad05-4c76-92ab-b6bc95e71d69/8abad1f1-ad05-4c76-92ab-b6bc95e71d69.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8abad1f1-ad05-4c76-92ab-b6bc95e71d69/8abad1f1-ad05-4c76-92ab-b6bc95e71d69.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8abad1f1-ad05-4c76-92ab-b6bc95e71d69/8abad1f1-ad05-4c76-92ab-b6bc95e71d69.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Background of the Lawsuit

- Defendants:
    - Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn: Both are lawyers who were appointed as co-executors of Jeffrey Epstein’s estate following his death in August 2019. They have been responsible for managing the estate’s...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Background of the Lawsuit<br /><ol><li>Defendants:<ul><li>Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn: Both are lawyers who were appointed as co-executors of Jeffrey Epstein’s estate following his death in August 2019. They have been responsible for managing the estate’s affairs, including financial assets and legal claims against Epstein.</li></ul></li><li>Plaintiffs:<ul><li>Danielle Benskey: An alleged victim of Jeffrey Epstein who, along with other plaintiffs, has brought forward claims against the estate.</li><li>Jane Doe 3: Another individual who has accused Epstein of abuse and is seeking justice through the legal system.</li></ul></li></ol>Allegations and Claims<br /><ol><li>Mismanagement and Negligence:<ul><li>Estate Administration: The plaintiffs allege that Indyke and Kahn have mishandled the administration of Epstein’s estate. This includes accusations of mismanagement of financial assets, failure to properly address claims from victims, and overall negligence in managing the estate’s affairs.</li><li>Financial Irregularities: There are claims that the executors may have engaged in or failed to address financial irregularities that negatively impacted the estate’s value and its ability to settle claims.</li></ul></li><li>Failure to Address Victims’ Claims:<ul><li>Inadequate Settlements: The lawsuit argues that Indyke and Kahn did not adequately handle or settle claims made by Epstein’s victims. This includes allegations that they were unresponsive or failed to provide fair compensation to survivors like Benskey and Jane Doe 3.</li><li>Lack of Transparency: The plaintiffs accuse the executors of being opaque about the handling of the estate’s assets and the status of the victims’ claims.</li></ul></li></ol>Legal Proceedings<br /><ol><li>Filing and Court Actions:<ul><li>Lawsuit Details: The lawsuit has been filed in a civil court, where the plaintiffs seek financial damages and other remedies for the alleged mismanagement and failures in addressing their claims.</li><li>Court Hearings: There have been ongoing court hearings and legal maneuvers as the case progresses, including motions, evidence submissions, and testimonies.</li></ul></li><li>Recent Developments:<ul><li>Settlement Talks: There have been discussions and negotiations regarding potential settlements, though the specifics of these talks are not always publicly disclosed.</li><li>Court Orders: The court has issued various orders related to the case, including directives on evidence disclosure and procedural matters.</li></ul></li></ol>Broader Context<br /><ol><li>Epstein’s Estate:<ul><li>Complexity: Jeffrey Epstein’s estate is highly complex, involving significant financial assets, multiple claims from survivors, and legal disputes. The estate’s management has been under scrutiny, given Epstein’s criminal activities and the large number of victims involved.</li><li>Public Scrutiny: The handling of Epstein’s estate, including the actions of Indyke and Kahn, has attracted considerable public and media attention, adding to the pressure on the executors to address the allegations and claims appropriately.</li></ul></li><li>Victims’ Advocacy:<ul><li>Support for Survivors: The lawsuit is part of broader efforts by victims and their advocates to seek justice and accountability for the abuse they endured. It reflects ongoing challenges in achieving fair compensation and redress for survivors of Epstein’s abuse.</li></ul></li></ol><br /><br />(commercial at 8:16)<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://wallstreetonparade.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Bensky-Jane-Doe-3-v-Indyke-Kahn-2024.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Microsoft Word - 2024.02.16 Kahn Indyke Complaint (FINAL) (wallstreetonparade.com)</a><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a...]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2025</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition: Danielle Bensky And The Lawsuit Filed Against Indyke And Kahn (5-8) (6/10/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-danielle-bensky-and-the-lawsuit-filed-against-indyke-and-kahn-5-8-6-10-26--72462045</link><description><![CDATA[Background of the Lawsuit<br /><ol><li>Defendants:<ul><li>Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn: Both are lawyers who were appointed as co-executors of Jeffrey Epstein’s estate following his death in August 2019. They have been responsible for managing the estate’s affairs, including financial assets and legal claims against Epstein.</li></ul></li><li>Plaintiffs:<ul><li>Danielle Benskey: An alleged victim of Jeffrey Epstein who, along with other plaintiffs, has brought forward claims against the estate.</li><li>Jane Doe 3: Another individual who has accused Epstein of abuse and is seeking justice through the legal system.</li></ul></li></ol>Allegations and Claims<br /><ol><li>Mismanagement and Negligence:<ul><li>Estate Administration: The plaintiffs allege that Indyke and Kahn have mishandled the administration of Epstein’s estate. This includes accusations of mismanagement of financial assets, failure to properly address claims from victims, and overall negligence in managing the estate’s affairs.</li><li>Financial Irregularities: There are claims that the executors may have engaged in or failed to address financial irregularities that negatively impacted the estate’s value and its ability to settle claims.</li></ul></li><li>Failure to Address Victims’ Claims:<ul><li>Inadequate Settlements: The lawsuit argues that Indyke and Kahn did not adequately handle or settle claims made by Epstein’s victims. This includes allegations that they were unresponsive or failed to provide fair compensation to survivors like Benskey and Jane Doe 3.</li><li>Lack of Transparency: The plaintiffs accuse the executors of being opaque about the handling of the estate’s assets and the status of the victims’ claims.</li></ul></li></ol>Legal Proceedings<br /><ol><li>Filing and Court Actions:<ul><li>Lawsuit Details: The lawsuit has been filed in a civil court, where the plaintiffs seek financial damages and other remedies for the alleged mismanagement and failures in addressing their claims.</li><li>Court Hearings: There have been ongoing court hearings and legal maneuvers as the case progresses, including motions, evidence submissions, and testimonies.</li></ul></li><li>Recent Developments:<ul><li>Settlement Talks: There have been discussions and negotiations regarding potential settlements, though the specifics of these talks are not always publicly disclosed.</li><li>Court Orders: The court has issued various orders related to the case, including directives on evidence disclosure and procedural matters.</li></ul></li></ol>Broader Context<br /><ol><li>Epstein’s Estate:<ul><li>Complexity: Jeffrey Epstein’s estate is highly complex, involving significant financial assets, multiple claims from survivors, and legal disputes. The estate’s management has been under scrutiny, given Epstein’s criminal activities and the large number of victims involved.</li><li>Public Scrutiny: The handling of Epstein’s estate, including the actions of Indyke and Kahn, has attracted considerable public and media attention, adding to the pressure on the executors to address the allegations and claims appropriately.</li></ul></li><li>Victims’ Advocacy:<ul><li>Support for Survivors: The lawsuit is part of broader efforts by victims and their advocates to seek justice and accountability for the abuse they endured. It reflects ongoing challenges in achieving fair compensation and redress for survivors of Epstein’s abuse.</li></ul></li></ol><br /><br />(commercial at 8:16)<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://wallstreetonparade.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Bensky-Jane-Doe-3-v-Indyke-Kahn-2024.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Microsoft Word - 2024.02.16 Kahn Indyke Complaint (FINAL) (wallstreetonparade.com)</a><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72462045</guid><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 08:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72462045/megabensky5n6n7n8.mp3" length="53359639" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/18326ee7-e81d-4b53-ae8d-560f912915ab/18326ee7-e81d-4b53-ae8d-560f912915ab.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/18326ee7-e81d-4b53-ae8d-560f912915ab/18326ee7-e81d-4b53-ae8d-560f912915ab.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/18326ee7-e81d-4b53-ae8d-560f912915ab/18326ee7-e81d-4b53-ae8d-560f912915ab.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Background of the Lawsuit

- Defendants:
    - Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn: Both are lawyers who were appointed as co-executors of Jeffrey Epstein’s estate following his death in August 2019. They have been responsible for managing the estate’s...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Background of the Lawsuit<br /><ol><li>Defendants:<ul><li>Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn: Both are lawyers who were appointed as co-executors of Jeffrey Epstein’s estate following his death in August 2019. They have been responsible for managing the estate’s affairs, including financial assets and legal claims against Epstein.</li></ul></li><li>Plaintiffs:<ul><li>Danielle Benskey: An alleged victim of Jeffrey Epstein who, along with other plaintiffs, has brought forward claims against the estate.</li><li>Jane Doe 3: Another individual who has accused Epstein of abuse and is seeking justice through the legal system.</li></ul></li></ol>Allegations and Claims<br /><ol><li>Mismanagement and Negligence:<ul><li>Estate Administration: The plaintiffs allege that Indyke and Kahn have mishandled the administration of Epstein’s estate. This includes accusations of mismanagement of financial assets, failure to properly address claims from victims, and overall negligence in managing the estate’s affairs.</li><li>Financial Irregularities: There are claims that the executors may have engaged in or failed to address financial irregularities that negatively impacted the estate’s value and its ability to settle claims.</li></ul></li><li>Failure to Address Victims’ Claims:<ul><li>Inadequate Settlements: The lawsuit argues that Indyke and Kahn did not adequately handle or settle claims made by Epstein’s victims. This includes allegations that they were unresponsive or failed to provide fair compensation to survivors like Benskey and Jane Doe 3.</li><li>Lack of Transparency: The plaintiffs accuse the executors of being opaque about the handling of the estate’s assets and the status of the victims’ claims.</li></ul></li></ol>Legal Proceedings<br /><ol><li>Filing and Court Actions:<ul><li>Lawsuit Details: The lawsuit has been filed in a civil court, where the plaintiffs seek financial damages and other remedies for the alleged mismanagement and failures in addressing their claims.</li><li>Court Hearings: There have been ongoing court hearings and legal maneuvers as the case progresses, including motions, evidence submissions, and testimonies.</li></ul></li><li>Recent Developments:<ul><li>Settlement Talks: There have been discussions and negotiations regarding potential settlements, though the specifics of these talks are not always publicly disclosed.</li><li>Court Orders: The court has issued various orders related to the case, including directives on evidence disclosure and procedural matters.</li></ul></li></ol>Broader Context<br /><ol><li>Epstein’s Estate:<ul><li>Complexity: Jeffrey Epstein’s estate is highly complex, involving significant financial assets, multiple claims from survivors, and legal disputes. The estate’s management has been under scrutiny, given Epstein’s criminal activities and the large number of victims involved.</li><li>Public Scrutiny: The handling of Epstein’s estate, including the actions of Indyke and Kahn, has attracted considerable public and media attention, adding to the pressure on the executors to address the allegations and claims appropriately.</li></ul></li><li>Victims’ Advocacy:<ul><li>Support for Survivors: The lawsuit is part of broader efforts by victims and their advocates to seek justice and accountability for the abuse they endured. It reflects ongoing challenges in achieving fair compensation and redress for survivors of Epstein’s abuse.</li></ul></li></ol><br /><br />(commercial at 8:16)<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://wallstreetonparade.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Bensky-Jane-Doe-3-v-Indyke-Kahn-2024.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Microsoft Word - 2024.02.16 Kahn Indyke Complaint (FINAL) (wallstreetonparade.com)</a><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a...]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3335</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition: Danielle Bensky And The Lawsuit Filed Against Indyke And Kahn (1-4) (6/10/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-danielle-bensky-and-the-lawsuit-filed-against-indyke-and-kahn-1-4-6-10-26--72462044</link><description><![CDATA[Background of the Lawsuit<br /><ol><li>Defendants:<ul><li>Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn: Both are lawyers who were appointed as co-executors of Jeffrey Epstein’s estate following his death in August 2019. They have been responsible for managing the estate’s affairs, including financial assets and legal claims against Epstein.</li></ul></li><li>Plaintiffs:<ul><li>Danielle Benskey: An alleged victim of Jeffrey Epstein who, along with other plaintiffs, has brought forward claims against the estate.</li><li>Jane Doe 3: Another individual who has accused Epstein of abuse and is seeking justice through the legal system.</li></ul></li></ol>Allegations and Claims<br /><ol><li>Mismanagement and Negligence:<ul><li>Estate Administration: The plaintiffs allege that Indyke and Kahn have mishandled the administration of Epstein’s estate. This includes accusations of mismanagement of financial assets, failure to properly address claims from victims, and overall negligence in managing the estate’s affairs.</li><li>Financial Irregularities: There are claims that the executors may have engaged in or failed to address financial irregularities that negatively impacted the estate’s value and its ability to settle claims.</li></ul></li><li>Failure to Address Victims’ Claims:<ul><li>Inadequate Settlements: The lawsuit argues that Indyke and Kahn did not adequately handle or settle claims made by Epstein’s victims. This includes allegations that they were unresponsive or failed to provide fair compensation to survivors like Benskey and Jane Doe 3.</li><li>Lack of Transparency: The plaintiffs accuse the executors of being opaque about the handling of the estate’s assets and the status of the victims’ claims.</li></ul></li></ol>Legal Proceedings<br /><ol><li>Filing and Court Actions:<ul><li>Lawsuit Details: The lawsuit has been filed in a civil court, where the plaintiffs seek financial damages and other remedies for the alleged mismanagement and failures in addressing their claims.</li><li>Court Hearings: There have been ongoing court hearings and legal maneuvers as the case progresses, including motions, evidence submissions, and testimonies.</li></ul></li><li>Recent Developments:<ul><li>Settlement Talks: There have been discussions and negotiations regarding potential settlements, though the specifics of these talks are not always publicly disclosed.</li><li>Court Orders: The court has issued various orders related to the case, including directives on evidence disclosure and procedural matters.</li></ul></li></ol>Broader Context<br /><ol><li>Epstein’s Estate:<ul><li>Complexity: Jeffrey Epstein’s estate is highly complex, involving significant financial assets, multiple claims from survivors, and legal disputes. The estate’s management has been under scrutiny, given Epstein’s criminal activities and the large number of victims involved.</li><li>Public Scrutiny: The handling of Epstein’s estate, including the actions of Indyke and Kahn, has attracted considerable public and media attention, adding to the pressure on the executors to address the allegations and claims appropriately.</li></ul></li><li>Victims’ Advocacy:<ul><li>Support for Survivors: The lawsuit is part of broader efforts by victims and their advocates to seek justice and accountability for the abuse they endured. It reflects ongoing challenges in achieving fair compensation and redress for survivors of Epstein’s abuse.</li></ul></li></ol><br /><br />(commercial at 8:16)<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://wallstreetonparade.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Bensky-Jane-Doe-3-v-Indyke-Kahn-2024.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Microsoft Word - 2024.02.16 Kahn Indyke Complaint (FINAL) (wallstreetonparade.com)</a><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72462044</guid><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72462044/megaindykebensky1n2n3n4.mp3" length="43197379" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/39356985-e7c8-48b8-81b3-b8c7f5b9a3b6/39356985-e7c8-48b8-81b3-b8c7f5b9a3b6.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/39356985-e7c8-48b8-81b3-b8c7f5b9a3b6/39356985-e7c8-48b8-81b3-b8c7f5b9a3b6.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/39356985-e7c8-48b8-81b3-b8c7f5b9a3b6/39356985-e7c8-48b8-81b3-b8c7f5b9a3b6.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Background of the Lawsuit

- Defendants:
    - Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn: Both are lawyers who were appointed as co-executors of Jeffrey Epstein’s estate following his death in August 2019. They have been responsible for managing the estate’s...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Background of the Lawsuit<br /><ol><li>Defendants:<ul><li>Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn: Both are lawyers who were appointed as co-executors of Jeffrey Epstein’s estate following his death in August 2019. They have been responsible for managing the estate’s affairs, including financial assets and legal claims against Epstein.</li></ul></li><li>Plaintiffs:<ul><li>Danielle Benskey: An alleged victim of Jeffrey Epstein who, along with other plaintiffs, has brought forward claims against the estate.</li><li>Jane Doe 3: Another individual who has accused Epstein of abuse and is seeking justice through the legal system.</li></ul></li></ol>Allegations and Claims<br /><ol><li>Mismanagement and Negligence:<ul><li>Estate Administration: The plaintiffs allege that Indyke and Kahn have mishandled the administration of Epstein’s estate. This includes accusations of mismanagement of financial assets, failure to properly address claims from victims, and overall negligence in managing the estate’s affairs.</li><li>Financial Irregularities: There are claims that the executors may have engaged in or failed to address financial irregularities that negatively impacted the estate’s value and its ability to settle claims.</li></ul></li><li>Failure to Address Victims’ Claims:<ul><li>Inadequate Settlements: The lawsuit argues that Indyke and Kahn did not adequately handle or settle claims made by Epstein’s victims. This includes allegations that they were unresponsive or failed to provide fair compensation to survivors like Benskey and Jane Doe 3.</li><li>Lack of Transparency: The plaintiffs accuse the executors of being opaque about the handling of the estate’s assets and the status of the victims’ claims.</li></ul></li></ol>Legal Proceedings<br /><ol><li>Filing and Court Actions:<ul><li>Lawsuit Details: The lawsuit has been filed in a civil court, where the plaintiffs seek financial damages and other remedies for the alleged mismanagement and failures in addressing their claims.</li><li>Court Hearings: There have been ongoing court hearings and legal maneuvers as the case progresses, including motions, evidence submissions, and testimonies.</li></ul></li><li>Recent Developments:<ul><li>Settlement Talks: There have been discussions and negotiations regarding potential settlements, though the specifics of these talks are not always publicly disclosed.</li><li>Court Orders: The court has issued various orders related to the case, including directives on evidence disclosure and procedural matters.</li></ul></li></ol>Broader Context<br /><ol><li>Epstein’s Estate:<ul><li>Complexity: Jeffrey Epstein’s estate is highly complex, involving significant financial assets, multiple claims from survivors, and legal disputes. The estate’s management has been under scrutiny, given Epstein’s criminal activities and the large number of victims involved.</li><li>Public Scrutiny: The handling of Epstein’s estate, including the actions of Indyke and Kahn, has attracted considerable public and media attention, adding to the pressure on the executors to address the allegations and claims appropriately.</li></ul></li><li>Victims’ Advocacy:<ul><li>Support for Survivors: The lawsuit is part of broader efforts by victims and their advocates to seek justice and accountability for the abuse they endured. It reflects ongoing challenges in achieving fair compensation and redress for survivors of Epstein’s abuse.</li></ul></li></ol><br /><br />(commercial at 8:16)<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://wallstreetonparade.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Bensky-Jane-Doe-3-v-Indyke-Kahn-2024.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Microsoft Word - 2024.02.16 Kahn Indyke Complaint (FINAL) (wallstreetonparade.com)</a><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a...]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2700</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Virginia Robert's Rejects  Ghislaine Maxwell's Summary Judgement Push (Part 4)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/virginia-robert-s-rejects-ghislaine-maxwell-s-summary-judgement-push-part-4--72460834</link><description><![CDATA[Virginia Giuffre’s response to Ghislaine Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell’s attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell’s statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre’s legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein’s trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.<br /><br />Virginia Giuffre’s response to Ghislaine Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell’s attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell’s statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre’s legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein’s trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Giuffre-unseal.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Giuffre-unseal.pdf (courthousenews.com)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72460834</guid><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72460834/vrobrespsum4.mp3" length="18015337" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/229c98b5-ed9f-4df1-b3d1-cac2361c67b7/229c98b5-ed9f-4df1-b3d1-cac2361c67b7.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/229c98b5-ed9f-4df1-b3d1-cac2361c67b7/229c98b5-ed9f-4df1-b3d1-cac2361c67b7.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/229c98b5-ed9f-4df1-b3d1-cac2361c67b7/229c98b5-ed9f-4df1-b3d1-cac2361c67b7.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Virginia Giuffre’s response to Ghislaine Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell’s attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell’s statements denying any wrongdoing were not...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Virginia Giuffre’s response to Ghislaine Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell’s attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell’s statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre’s legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein’s trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.<br /><br />Virginia Giuffre’s response to Ghislaine Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell’s attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell’s statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre’s legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein’s trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Giuffre-unseal.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Giuffre-unseal.pdf (courthousenews.com)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1126</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Virginia Robert's Rejects  Ghislaine Maxwell's Summary Judgement Push (Part 3)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/virginia-robert-s-rejects-ghislaine-maxwell-s-summary-judgement-push-part-3--72460838</link><description><![CDATA[Virginia Giuffre’s response to Ghislaine Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell’s attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell’s statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre’s legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein’s trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.<br /><br />Virginia Giuffre’s response to Ghislaine Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell’s attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell’s statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre’s legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein’s trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Giuffre-unseal.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Giuffre-unseal.pdf (courthousenews.com)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72460838</guid><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72460838/vrobrespsum3.mp3" length="18269874" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1ac146e0-9e8b-4491-82f2-44361ba78474/1ac146e0-9e8b-4491-82f2-44361ba78474.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1ac146e0-9e8b-4491-82f2-44361ba78474/1ac146e0-9e8b-4491-82f2-44361ba78474.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1ac146e0-9e8b-4491-82f2-44361ba78474/1ac146e0-9e8b-4491-82f2-44361ba78474.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Virginia Giuffre’s response to Ghislaine Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell’s attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell’s statements denying any wrongdoing were not...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Virginia Giuffre’s response to Ghislaine Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell’s attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell’s statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre’s legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein’s trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.<br /><br />Virginia Giuffre’s response to Ghislaine Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell’s attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell’s statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre’s legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein’s trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Giuffre-unseal.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Giuffre-unseal.pdf (courthousenews.com)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1142</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Virginia Robert's Rejects  Ghislaine Maxwell's Summary Judgement Push (Part 2)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/virginia-robert-s-rejects-ghislaine-maxwell-s-summary-judgement-push-part-2--72460839</link><description><![CDATA[Virginia Giuffre’s response to Ghislaine Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell’s attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell’s statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre’s legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein’s trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.<br /><br />Virginia Giuffre’s response to Ghislaine Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell’s attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell’s statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre’s legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein’s trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Giuffre-unseal.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Giuffre-unseal.pdf (courthousenews.com)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72460839</guid><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72460839/vrobrespsum2.mp3" length="12872767" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/40f8ea1c-e63b-4477-b7bf-4e1fa492ddb5/40f8ea1c-e63b-4477-b7bf-4e1fa492ddb5.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/40f8ea1c-e63b-4477-b7bf-4e1fa492ddb5/40f8ea1c-e63b-4477-b7bf-4e1fa492ddb5.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/40f8ea1c-e63b-4477-b7bf-4e1fa492ddb5/40f8ea1c-e63b-4477-b7bf-4e1fa492ddb5.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Virginia Giuffre’s response to Ghislaine Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell’s attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell’s statements denying any wrongdoing were not...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Virginia Giuffre’s response to Ghislaine Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell’s attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell’s statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre’s legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein’s trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.<br /><br />Virginia Giuffre’s response to Ghislaine Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell’s attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell’s statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre’s legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein’s trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Giuffre-unseal.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Giuffre-unseal.pdf (courthousenews.com)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>805</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Virginia Robert's Rejects  Ghislaine Maxwell's Summary Judgement Push (Part 1)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/virginia-robert-s-rejects-ghislaine-maxwell-s-summary-judgement-push-part-1--72460840</link><description><![CDATA[Virginia Giuffre’s response to Ghislaine Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell’s attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell’s statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre’s legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein’s trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.<br /><br />Virginia Giuffre’s response to Ghislaine Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell’s attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell’s statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre’s legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein’s trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Giuffre-unseal.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Giuffre-unseal.pdf (courthousenews.com)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72460840</guid><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72460840/vrobrespsum1.mp3" length="12955941" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/fdfcda15-af85-4cbd-b4ce-eb869c656a47/fdfcda15-af85-4cbd-b4ce-eb869c656a47.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/fdfcda15-af85-4cbd-b4ce-eb869c656a47/fdfcda15-af85-4cbd-b4ce-eb869c656a47.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/fdfcda15-af85-4cbd-b4ce-eb869c656a47/fdfcda15-af85-4cbd-b4ce-eb869c656a47.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Virginia Giuffre’s response to Ghislaine Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell’s attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell’s statements denying any wrongdoing were not...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Virginia Giuffre’s response to Ghislaine Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell’s attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell’s statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre’s legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein’s trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.<br /><br />Virginia Giuffre’s response to Ghislaine Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell’s attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell’s statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre’s legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein’s trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Giuffre-unseal.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Giuffre-unseal.pdf (courthousenews.com)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>810</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Pam Bondi Congressional Oversight Committee Epstein Related Transcript (Part 11) (6/10/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-pam-bondi-congressional-oversight-committee-epstein-related-transcript-part-11-6-10-26--72441653</link><description><![CDATA[Pam Bondi’s congressional transcript showed her trying to defend the Justice Department’s handling of the Epstein files while repeatedly distancing herself from the day-to-day mechanics of the review. She told House Oversight lawmakers that Todd Blanche was the official “in charge” of the Epstein records process, saying she did not personally conduct the document review and that the work had been delegated to him. Bondi acknowledged that mistakes were made, including redaction problems, but framed the release as a massive and difficult undertaking rather than a deliberate attempt to obstruct transparency. At the same time, she insisted the department was committed to accountability, even as lawmakers pressed her on why the disclosures remained incomplete, flawed, or slow-moving.<br /><br />The transcript also showed Bondi trying to avoid directly blaming Blanche while making clear that he was the person managing the release. She praised him as ethical and capable, but Democrats seized on her answers as evidence that Blanche, along with other DOJ and FBI officials, should be brought before Congress to explain the process in detail. Bondi also said she learned about Ghislaine Maxwell’s prison transfer from news reports, denied involvement in that decision, rejected the idea of a Maxwell pardon, and refused to discuss private conversations with Donald Trump. The result was a transcript that did not settle the Epstein files controversy, but instead widened the accountability fight by making clear that Congress still does not have a clean answer on who controlled the review, why errors happened, and whether the public has truly received the full record.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Final-Bondi-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Final-Bondi-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72441653</guid><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72441653/bonditranscripts11.mp3" length="11927763" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/19221fe7-2268-4716-8e53-7a56c3cd85e3/19221fe7-2268-4716-8e53-7a56c3cd85e3.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/19221fe7-2268-4716-8e53-7a56c3cd85e3/19221fe7-2268-4716-8e53-7a56c3cd85e3.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/19221fe7-2268-4716-8e53-7a56c3cd85e3/19221fe7-2268-4716-8e53-7a56c3cd85e3.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Pam Bondi’s congressional transcript showed her trying to defend the Justice Department’s handling of the Epstein files while repeatedly distancing herself from the day-to-day mechanics of the review. She told House Oversight lawmakers that Todd...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Pam Bondi’s congressional transcript showed her trying to defend the Justice Department’s handling of the Epstein files while repeatedly distancing herself from the day-to-day mechanics of the review. She told House Oversight lawmakers that Todd Blanche was the official “in charge” of the Epstein records process, saying she did not personally conduct the document review and that the work had been delegated to him. Bondi acknowledged that mistakes were made, including redaction problems, but framed the release as a massive and difficult undertaking rather than a deliberate attempt to obstruct transparency. At the same time, she insisted the department was committed to accountability, even as lawmakers pressed her on why the disclosures remained incomplete, flawed, or slow-moving.<br /><br />The transcript also showed Bondi trying to avoid directly blaming Blanche while making clear that he was the person managing the release. She praised him as ethical and capable, but Democrats seized on her answers as evidence that Blanche, along with other DOJ and FBI officials, should be brought before Congress to explain the process in detail. Bondi also said she learned about Ghislaine Maxwell’s prison transfer from news reports, denied involvement in that decision, rejected the idea of a Maxwell pardon, and refused to discuss private conversations with Donald Trump. The result was a transcript that did not settle the Epstein files controversy, but instead widened the accountability fight by making clear that Congress still does not have a clean answer on who controlled the review, why errors happened, and whether the public has truly received the full record.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Final-Bondi-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Final-Bondi-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>746</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Bill Gates Set To Appear Before The Epstein Congressional Oversight Committee (6/10/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/bill-gates-set-to-appear-before-the-epstein-congressional-oversight-committee-6-10-26--72460759</link><description><![CDATA[Bill Gates is set to sit for a closed-door interview with the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on June 10 as part of the committee’s continuing investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, the federal government’s handling of the case, and the powerful people who moved through Epstein’s orbit. Gates was asked to appear after recently released Justice Department records included photos, emails, and other material tying him to Epstein between roughly 2011 and 2014, years after Epstein’s 2008 conviction. Gates has not been accused of criminal wrongdoing, and he has repeatedly said his relationship with Epstein was a serious mistake, explaining that he met with him in hopes of attracting money for global health and philanthropic work. The Gates Foundation has said there were discussions involving Epstein, but no funding ever came from him.<br /><br />The interview is expected to focus on why Gates continued meeting with Epstein despite Epstein’s known criminal history, what Epstein was seeking from Gates and the Gates Foundation, and whether Epstein tried to leverage access to Gates for money, influence, credibility, or protection. Gates’ association with Epstein has already had personal and reputational consequences, including renewed scrutiny after Melinda French Gates said Epstein was one of the issues that contributed to the breakdown of their marriage. The broader point is that Congress is now pulling Gates into the same unresolved web that has surrounded Epstein for years: how a convicted sex offender continued attracting billionaires, politicians, financiers, academics, and institutional players long after everyone knew who he was.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2026/06/10/bill-gates-jeffrey-epstein-house-oversight-interview.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bill Gates questioned about Jeffrey Epstein by House Oversight</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72460759</guid><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 18:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72460759/gatestoappearcongresstoday.mp3" length="12613634" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/83a44756-7a1e-43d9-97e3-26535b7ca293/83a44756-7a1e-43d9-97e3-26535b7ca293.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/83a44756-7a1e-43d9-97e3-26535b7ca293/83a44756-7a1e-43d9-97e3-26535b7ca293.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/83a44756-7a1e-43d9-97e3-26535b7ca293/83a44756-7a1e-43d9-97e3-26535b7ca293.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Bill Gates is set to sit for a closed-door interview with the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on June 10 as part of the committee’s continuing investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, the federal government’s handling of the case, and the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Bill Gates is set to sit for a closed-door interview with the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on June 10 as part of the committee’s continuing investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, the federal government’s handling of the case, and the powerful people who moved through Epstein’s orbit. Gates was asked to appear after recently released Justice Department records included photos, emails, and other material tying him to Epstein between roughly 2011 and 2014, years after Epstein’s 2008 conviction. Gates has not been accused of criminal wrongdoing, and he has repeatedly said his relationship with Epstein was a serious mistake, explaining that he met with him in hopes of attracting money for global health and philanthropic work. The Gates Foundation has said there were discussions involving Epstein, but no funding ever came from him.<br /><br />The interview is expected to focus on why Gates continued meeting with Epstein despite Epstein’s known criminal history, what Epstein was seeking from Gates and the Gates Foundation, and whether Epstein tried to leverage access to Gates for money, influence, credibility, or protection. Gates’ association with Epstein has already had personal and reputational consequences, including renewed scrutiny after Melinda French Gates said Epstein was one of the issues that contributed to the breakdown of their marriage. The broader point is that Congress is now pulling Gates into the same unresolved web that has surrounded Epstein for years: how a convicted sex offender continued attracting billionaires, politicians, financiers, academics, and institutional players long after everyone knew who he was.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2026/06/10/bill-gates-jeffrey-epstein-house-oversight-interview.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bill Gates questioned about Jeffrey Epstein by House Oversight</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>789</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Epstein Files Push Britain Into Institutional Crisis (6/10/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/epstein-files-push-britain-into-institutional-crisis-6-10-26--72441650</link><description><![CDATA[The Epstein files are being framed as more than another royal scandal in Britain; they are being presented as a full institutional crisis hitting the monarchy, Parliament, and the Metropolitan Police all at once. The reporting argues that the newly released U.S. Justice Department documents have accelerated a collapse in public trust, with polling showing support for the monarchy falling below majority levels and approval ratings for senior royals dropping sharply. The deepest royal damage centers on Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, who was reportedly arrested in February 2026 on suspicion of misconduct in public office over questions about whether he forwarded classified government reports to Epstein while serving as a trade envoy. No charges have been brought, but the arrest and open investigation have turned Epstein from a reputational stain on the royal family into a live legal and constitutional problem.<br /><br />The political and policing fallout is described as just as severe. Keir Starmer’s government is portrayed as being badly damaged by the Peter Mandelson connection, after Mandelson’s Epstein relationship and later document releases reportedly helped fuel a Labour revolt, cabinet resignation pressure, and growing questions about Starmer’s judgment. At the same time, the Metropolitan Police is under scrutiny over allegations that officers had proximity to Epstein-linked social circles, that Epstein-connected flights entered and left Britain without meaningful scrutiny, and that a London property tied to Epstein was not pursued more aggressively despite concerns about young women being housed there under coercive conditions. The broader point is that Britain is not dealing with one isolated Epstein-related embarrassment, but a convergence of failures across the Crown, the government, and law enforcement — the very institutions that were supposed to prevent this kind of power-protected abuse from festering in the first place.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://easternherald.com/2026/06/08/epstein-files-britain-institutional-crisis-monarchy-parliament-police/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein Files Are Tearing Britain's Institutions Apart</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72441650</guid><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 16:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72441650/ukinstitutionsfailingepstein.mp3" length="12886561" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d0309fd4-f6aa-4f6d-a588-3c70916460a1/d0309fd4-f6aa-4f6d-a588-3c70916460a1.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d0309fd4-f6aa-4f6d-a588-3c70916460a1/d0309fd4-f6aa-4f6d-a588-3c70916460a1.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d0309fd4-f6aa-4f6d-a588-3c70916460a1/d0309fd4-f6aa-4f6d-a588-3c70916460a1.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Epstein files are being framed as more than another royal scandal in Britain; they are being presented as a full institutional crisis hitting the monarchy, Parliament, and the Metropolitan Police all at once. The reporting argues that the newly...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Epstein files are being framed as more than another royal scandal in Britain; they are being presented as a full institutional crisis hitting the monarchy, Parliament, and the Metropolitan Police all at once. The reporting argues that the newly released U.S. Justice Department documents have accelerated a collapse in public trust, with polling showing support for the monarchy falling below majority levels and approval ratings for senior royals dropping sharply. The deepest royal damage centers on Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, who was reportedly arrested in February 2026 on suspicion of misconduct in public office over questions about whether he forwarded classified government reports to Epstein while serving as a trade envoy. No charges have been brought, but the arrest and open investigation have turned Epstein from a reputational stain on the royal family into a live legal and constitutional problem.<br /><br />The political and policing fallout is described as just as severe. Keir Starmer’s government is portrayed as being badly damaged by the Peter Mandelson connection, after Mandelson’s Epstein relationship and later document releases reportedly helped fuel a Labour revolt, cabinet resignation pressure, and growing questions about Starmer’s judgment. At the same time, the Metropolitan Police is under scrutiny over allegations that officers had proximity to Epstein-linked social circles, that Epstein-connected flights entered and left Britain without meaningful scrutiny, and that a London property tied to Epstein was not pursued more aggressively despite concerns about young women being housed there under coercive conditions. The broader point is that Britain is not dealing with one isolated Epstein-related embarrassment, but a convergence of failures across the Crown, the government, and law enforcement — the very institutions that were supposed to prevent this kind of power-protected abuse from festering in the first place.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://easternherald.com/2026/06/08/epstein-files-britain-institutional-crisis-monarchy-parliament-police/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein Files Are Tearing Britain's Institutions Apart</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>806</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Spencer Kuvin Talks Nadia Marcinkova  And The Line Between Victim And Conspirator (6/10/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/spencer-kuvin-talks-nadia-marcinkova-and-the-line-between-victim-and-conspirator-6-10-26--72441648</link><description><![CDATA[Nadia Marcinko, also known as Nadia Marcinkova, is being pushed back into the center of the Epstein story because of her unusual position inside his world: she has been described as a former teenage model, Epstein girlfriend, assistant, and pilot connected to his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” According to the reporting, she was allegedly recruited through Jean-Luc Brunel’s modeling orbit, later became one of Epstein’s closest companions after Ghislaine Maxwell, and was named as a “potential co-conspirator” in the 2008 non-prosecution agreement that gave immunity to several Epstein associates. Her lawyers have maintained that she was a victim of Epstein, and she has not been charged with a crime, but survivors and court records have long raised questions about whether she also helped recruit girls or participated in abuse.<br /><br />The renewed focus is on what Marcinko may know. Prison records reportedly show that she visited Epstein 67 times during his 2008 jail sentence, and attorneys for survivors argue that she could hold important information about Epstein’s operation, the people who moved through it, and the powerful figures who interacted with him. The piece frames Marcinko as one of the complicated Epstein-world figures who may have begun as a victim but later became entangled in the machinery around him, making her potentially significant to investigators and survivors still searching for accountability. Her disappearance from public view since Epstein’s 2019 death only adds to the sense that there are still key people in Epstein’s orbit who have never been fully questioned in public.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source<br /><br /><a href="https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/39294083/epstein-pilot-model-girlfriend-lolita-express/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein’s ‘Lolita Express’ pilot girlfriend 'could blow case open' after ‘luring girls’ &amp; seeing paedo 67 times in jail</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72441648</guid><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72441648/kuvinonnadia.mp3" length="14240331" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0d07d20f-d7f3-45c5-a019-82462616f7c2/0d07d20f-d7f3-45c5-a019-82462616f7c2.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0d07d20f-d7f3-45c5-a019-82462616f7c2/0d07d20f-d7f3-45c5-a019-82462616f7c2.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0d07d20f-d7f3-45c5-a019-82462616f7c2/0d07d20f-d7f3-45c5-a019-82462616f7c2.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Nadia Marcinko, also known as Nadia Marcinkova, is being pushed back into the center of the Epstein story because of her unusual position inside his world: she has been described as a former teenage model, Epstein girlfriend, assistant, and pilot...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Nadia Marcinko, also known as Nadia Marcinkova, is being pushed back into the center of the Epstein story because of her unusual position inside his world: she has been described as a former teenage model, Epstein girlfriend, assistant, and pilot connected to his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” According to the reporting, she was allegedly recruited through Jean-Luc Brunel’s modeling orbit, later became one of Epstein’s closest companions after Ghislaine Maxwell, and was named as a “potential co-conspirator” in the 2008 non-prosecution agreement that gave immunity to several Epstein associates. Her lawyers have maintained that she was a victim of Epstein, and she has not been charged with a crime, but survivors and court records have long raised questions about whether she also helped recruit girls or participated in abuse.<br /><br />The renewed focus is on what Marcinko may know. Prison records reportedly show that she visited Epstein 67 times during his 2008 jail sentence, and attorneys for survivors argue that she could hold important information about Epstein’s operation, the people who moved through it, and the powerful figures who interacted with him. The piece frames Marcinko as one of the complicated Epstein-world figures who may have begun as a victim but later became entangled in the machinery around him, making her potentially significant to investigators and survivors still searching for accountability. Her disappearance from public view since Epstein’s 2019 death only adds to the sense that there are still key people in Epstein’s orbit who have never been fully questioned in public.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source<br /><br /><a href="https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/39294083/epstein-pilot-model-girlfriend-lolita-express/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein’s ‘Lolita Express’ pilot girlfriend 'could blow case open' after ‘luring girls’ &amp; seeing paedo 67 times in jail</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>890</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Sarah Kellen Testimony Puts Prince Andrew’s Palace Access Back Under Scrutiny (6/10/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/sarah-kellen-testimony-puts-prince-andrew-s-palace-access-back-under-scrutiny-6-10-26--72428832</link><description><![CDATA[Sarah Kellen, Jeffrey Epstein’s former personal assistant, told the House Oversight Committee that she was brought into Prince Andrew’s orbit, including private dinners in Andrew’s Buckingham Palace apartment and Princess Beatrice’s 18th birthday party at Windsor Castle. Kellen identified Andrew and Sarah Ferguson as notable figures within Epstein’s network, saying Andrew had been at Epstein’s New York home and that she had also been present at royal residences connected to him. Andrew has denied wrongdoing, but the testimony adds another layer to the long-running scrutiny over how deeply Epstein and his associates were able to move through elite royal spaces.<br /><br /><br />Kellen’s testimony is also significant because she occupies one of the most complicated positions in the Epstein story: she was named as a potential co-conspirator in Epstein’s 2008 plea deal, yet she has told authorities she was also groomed, controlled, and repeatedly raped by Epstein. She described Epstein as a manipulative and dangerous figure who used his access to powerful people around the world as a tool of intimidation, and she said the abuse continued even after he was jailed, including an alleged Skype call from prison in which he ordered her to undress on camera. Her account places Andrew’s palace access inside a broader pattern of Epstein using proximity to royalty, politicians, financiers, academics, and foreign leaders to project power and keep those around him trapped.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.thetimes.com/uk/royal-family/article/epsteins-pa-dined-with-andrew-buckingham-palace-mmp36stng" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein’s PA dined with Andrew in his Buckingham Palace rooms</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72428832</guid><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72428832/kellenandrew.mp3" length="10406809" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8420588e-ab3a-4136-910c-39b538b34151/8420588e-ab3a-4136-910c-39b538b34151.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8420588e-ab3a-4136-910c-39b538b34151/8420588e-ab3a-4136-910c-39b538b34151.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8420588e-ab3a-4136-910c-39b538b34151/8420588e-ab3a-4136-910c-39b538b34151.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Sarah Kellen, Jeffrey Epstein’s former personal assistant, told the House Oversight Committee that she was brought into Prince Andrew’s orbit, including private dinners in Andrew’s Buckingham Palace apartment and Princess Beatrice’s 18th birthday...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Sarah Kellen, Jeffrey Epstein’s former personal assistant, told the House Oversight Committee that she was brought into Prince Andrew’s orbit, including private dinners in Andrew’s Buckingham Palace apartment and Princess Beatrice’s 18th birthday party at Windsor Castle. Kellen identified Andrew and Sarah Ferguson as notable figures within Epstein’s network, saying Andrew had been at Epstein’s New York home and that she had also been present at royal residences connected to him. Andrew has denied wrongdoing, but the testimony adds another layer to the long-running scrutiny over how deeply Epstein and his associates were able to move through elite royal spaces.<br /><br /><br />Kellen’s testimony is also significant because she occupies one of the most complicated positions in the Epstein story: she was named as a potential co-conspirator in Epstein’s 2008 plea deal, yet she has told authorities she was also groomed, controlled, and repeatedly raped by Epstein. She described Epstein as a manipulative and dangerous figure who used his access to powerful people around the world as a tool of intimidation, and she said the abuse continued even after he was jailed, including an alleged Skype call from prison in which he ordered her to undress on camera. Her account places Andrew’s palace access inside a broader pattern of Epstein using proximity to royalty, politicians, financiers, academics, and foreign leaders to project power and keep those around him trapped.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.thetimes.com/uk/royal-family/article/epsteins-pa-dined-with-andrew-buckingham-palace-mmp36stng" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein’s PA dined with Andrew in his Buckingham Palace rooms</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>651</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   Ghislaine Maxwell And Her Ex Husband Scott Borgerson (6/10/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-ghislaine-maxwell-and-her-ex-husband-scott-borgerson-6-10-26--72440749</link><description><![CDATA[Scott Borgerson entered the Epstein story through his relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, which was initially hidden from public view even as prosecutors later revealed she was married. Borgerson, a tech executive and former Coast Guard officer, was widely identified as Maxwell’s secret husband after her arrest, and court reporting indicated the marriage became part of her bail arguments because her lawyers tried to present it as proof she had roots, assets, and reasons not to flee. Before that, Borgerson had publicly denied reports that Maxwell was living with him or that they were romantically involved, even as scrutiny intensified after Epstein’s death and Maxwell went underground before her 2020 arrest.<br /><br />The relationship reportedly collapsed once Maxwell was jailed and facing trial. According to media accounts citing people close to Maxwell, Borgerson ended the marriage during a tense jailhouse phone call and had moved on with a yoga teacher, an account most prominently reported after Maxwell’s conviction. That detail has the quality of tabloid humiliation, but it also fits the broader pattern of Maxwell’s post-arrest isolation: the socialite who once moved through elite circles with Epstein was left fighting for herself, while even the man presented in court as her husband had apparently stepped away. In that sense, Borgerson’s role is not central to Epstein’s criminal operation, but it is central to the collapse of Maxwell’s last public refuge — the private life she tried to keep sealed off from the wreckage around her.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72440749</guid><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 10:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72440749/megaborgersonmaxwell.mp3" length="38227426" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f199638f-b39e-46df-8500-aaee03f94e65/f199638f-b39e-46df-8500-aaee03f94e65.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f199638f-b39e-46df-8500-aaee03f94e65/f199638f-b39e-46df-8500-aaee03f94e65.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f199638f-b39e-46df-8500-aaee03f94e65/f199638f-b39e-46df-8500-aaee03f94e65.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Scott Borgerson entered the Epstein story through his relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, which was initially hidden from public view even as prosecutors later revealed she was married. Borgerson, a tech executive and former Coast Guard officer, was...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Scott Borgerson entered the Epstein story through his relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, which was initially hidden from public view even as prosecutors later revealed she was married. Borgerson, a tech executive and former Coast Guard officer, was widely identified as Maxwell’s secret husband after her arrest, and court reporting indicated the marriage became part of her bail arguments because her lawyers tried to present it as proof she had roots, assets, and reasons not to flee. Before that, Borgerson had publicly denied reports that Maxwell was living with him or that they were romantically involved, even as scrutiny intensified after Epstein’s death and Maxwell went underground before her 2020 arrest.<br /><br />The relationship reportedly collapsed once Maxwell was jailed and facing trial. According to media accounts citing people close to Maxwell, Borgerson ended the marriage during a tense jailhouse phone call and had moved on with a yoga teacher, an account most prominently reported after Maxwell’s conviction. That detail has the quality of tabloid humiliation, but it also fits the broader pattern of Maxwell’s post-arrest isolation: the socialite who once moved through elite circles with Epstein was left fighting for herself, while even the man presented in court as her husband had apparently stepped away. In that sense, Borgerson’s role is not central to Epstein’s criminal operation, but it is central to the collapse of Maxwell’s last public refuge — the private life she tried to keep sealed off from the wreckage around her.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2390</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  David Boies And His Complicated Role Within The Epstein Orbit (6/10/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-david-boies-and-his-complicated-role-within-the-epstein-orbit-6-10-26--72374108</link><description><![CDATA[David Boies fits into the Epstein story primarily as one of the most important civil attorneys for Virginia Giuffre and other Epstein survivors. He was not a prosecutor and he was not an investigator with subpoena power, but through civil litigation he helped force parts of the Epstein world into the open that powerful people had spent years trying to keep buried. Boies and his firm represented Giuffre in major legal battles tied to Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Alan Dershowitz, and Prince Andrew, using defamation and civil claims as vehicles to push back against denials, compel testimony, and preserve the public record. His role mattered because, in the absence of a fully satisfying criminal reckoning, survivor-led civil litigation became one of the few arenas where Epstein’s network could still be challenged.<br /><br />Boies also became part of the broader warfare around the Epstein narrative itself. His representation of Giuffre placed him in direct conflict with some of the powerful men accused or implicated in the survivor accounts, most notably Dershowitz, whose bitter legal fight with Giuffre eventually ended with her dropping the claim and stating she may have made a mistake, while Dershowitz maintained his denial. That outcome complicated the public perception of that specific allegation, but it did not erase Boies’s larger role: he helped keep Giuffre’s claims, Maxwell’s conduct, Prince Andrew’s exposure, and the failures of the justice system in the public eye. In the Epstein story, Boies represents the civil-litigation flank of the battle — the legal pressure point survivors used when prosecutors, institutions, and elites had either failed them or protected themselves first.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72374108</guid><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 08:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72374108/megadavidboiesroleepstein.mp3" length="47988027" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/722a002d-aa5d-4aaa-a123-150e87b95862/722a002d-aa5d-4aaa-a123-150e87b95862.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/722a002d-aa5d-4aaa-a123-150e87b95862/722a002d-aa5d-4aaa-a123-150e87b95862.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/722a002d-aa5d-4aaa-a123-150e87b95862/722a002d-aa5d-4aaa-a123-150e87b95862.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>David Boies fits into the Epstein story primarily as one of the most important civil attorneys for Virginia Giuffre and other Epstein survivors. He was not a prosecutor and he was not an investigator with subpoena power, but through civil litigation...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[David Boies fits into the Epstein story primarily as one of the most important civil attorneys for Virginia Giuffre and other Epstein survivors. He was not a prosecutor and he was not an investigator with subpoena power, but through civil litigation he helped force parts of the Epstein world into the open that powerful people had spent years trying to keep buried. Boies and his firm represented Giuffre in major legal battles tied to Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Alan Dershowitz, and Prince Andrew, using defamation and civil claims as vehicles to push back against denials, compel testimony, and preserve the public record. His role mattered because, in the absence of a fully satisfying criminal reckoning, survivor-led civil litigation became one of the few arenas where Epstein’s network could still be challenged.<br /><br />Boies also became part of the broader warfare around the Epstein narrative itself. His representation of Giuffre placed him in direct conflict with some of the powerful men accused or implicated in the survivor accounts, most notably Dershowitz, whose bitter legal fight with Giuffre eventually ended with her dropping the claim and stating she may have made a mistake, while Dershowitz maintained his denial. That outcome complicated the public perception of that specific allegation, but it did not erase Boies’s larger role: he helped keep Giuffre’s claims, Maxwell’s conduct, Prince Andrew’s exposure, and the failures of the justice system in the public eye. In the Epstein story, Boies represents the civil-litigation flank of the battle — the legal pressure point survivors used when prosecutors, institutions, and elites had either failed them or protected themselves first.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3000</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Transcripts From The DOJ's Sit Down With Ghislaine Maxwell (Part 19-23) (6/9/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-transcripts-from-the-doj-s-sit-down-with-ghislaine-maxwell-part-19-23-6-9-26--72421824</link><description><![CDATA[On August 22, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice released redacted transcripts and audio recordings of a two-day interview it conducted in July with Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year federal prison sentence for her role in Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking ring. During the interview, Maxwell denied ever seeing any inappropriate behavior by former President Donald Trump, describing him as a “gentleman in all respects,” and insisted she “never witnessed the president in any inappropriate setting in any way.” She also rejected the existence of a so-called “client list,” countering years of speculation, and claimed to have no knowledge of blackmail or illicit recordings tied to Epstein.<br /><br />In addition to defending high-profile figures, Maxwell expressed doubt that Epstein’s death was a suicide, while also rejecting the notion of an elaborate conspiracy or murder plot. The release of the transcripts—handled under the Trump-era Justice Department—has stirred sharp political debate. Trump allies have framed her remarks as vindication, while critics and Epstein’s survivors question her credibility, pointing to her conviction and suggesting her words may be aimed at influencing potential clemency or political favor.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/storage/audio-files/Interview%20Transcript/Interview%20Transcript%20-%20Maxwell%202025.07.24%20(Redacted).pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Interview Transcript - Maxwell 2025.07.24 (Redacted).pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72421824</guid><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72421824/megamaxtranscripts19n20n21n22n23.mp3" length="73264527" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/28349f5b-7b33-40d9-a3c3-02a33e7f00a9/28349f5b-7b33-40d9-a3c3-02a33e7f00a9.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/28349f5b-7b33-40d9-a3c3-02a33e7f00a9/28349f5b-7b33-40d9-a3c3-02a33e7f00a9.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/28349f5b-7b33-40d9-a3c3-02a33e7f00a9/28349f5b-7b33-40d9-a3c3-02a33e7f00a9.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On August 22, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice released redacted transcripts and audio recordings of a two-day interview it conducted in July with Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year federal prison sentence for her role in Jeffrey...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On August 22, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice released redacted transcripts and audio recordings of a two-day interview it conducted in July with Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year federal prison sentence for her role in Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking ring. During the interview, Maxwell denied ever seeing any inappropriate behavior by former President Donald Trump, describing him as a “gentleman in all respects,” and insisted she “never witnessed the president in any inappropriate setting in any way.” She also rejected the existence of a so-called “client list,” countering years of speculation, and claimed to have no knowledge of blackmail or illicit recordings tied to Epstein.<br /><br />In addition to defending high-profile figures, Maxwell expressed doubt that Epstein’s death was a suicide, while also rejecting the notion of an elaborate conspiracy or murder plot. The release of the transcripts—handled under the Trump-era Justice Department—has stirred sharp political debate. Trump allies have framed her remarks as vindication, while critics and Epstein’s survivors question her credibility, pointing to her conviction and suggesting her words may be aimed at influencing potential clemency or political favor.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/storage/audio-files/Interview%20Transcript/Interview%20Transcript%20-%20Maxwell%202025.07.24%20(Redacted).pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Interview Transcript - Maxwell 2025.07.24 (Redacted).pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4580</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Shredded in Real Time: BOP Staff Destroy Epstein Files While Oversight Officials Were Present</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/shredded-in-real-time-bop-staff-destroy-epstein-files-while-oversight-officials-were-present--72324208</link><description><![CDATA[The discovery that Epstein-related documents were shredded during an active investigation severely weakens the credibility of the official narrative. The directive language—“make sure you get that box too”—points to intentional, targeted destruction rather than routine procedure, especially given that oversight officials were present at the time. This behavior does not align with a story built on negligence and bureaucratic failure. Instead, it introduces evidence of deliberate decision-making, suggesting that certain materials were removed because of their potential impact. When placed alongside the known irregularities—camera failures, falsified logs, and procedural lapses—the destruction of documents shifts the case away from coincidence and toward a pattern of controlled outcomes.<br /><br />Once parts of the evidentiary record are intentionally destroyed, the integrity of the entire investigation is compromised. Missing documents mean missing connections—timelines, communications, and accountability chains that can no longer be reconstructed. This creates permanent gaps that prevent any conclusion from being considered complete or definitive. Rather than reinforcing the official explanation, the destruction of evidence raises new questions about what was removed and why. As a result, the case no longer supports a simple narrative of failure, but instead suggests that the scope of what could be known was actively limited.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72324208</guid><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72324208/mccshreddingdocumentsepsteindeath.mp3" length="15983639" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/22ebcc2a-1375-4453-9979-f71e1e60cdd7/22ebcc2a-1375-4453-9979-f71e1e60cdd7.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/22ebcc2a-1375-4453-9979-f71e1e60cdd7/22ebcc2a-1375-4453-9979-f71e1e60cdd7.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/22ebcc2a-1375-4453-9979-f71e1e60cdd7/22ebcc2a-1375-4453-9979-f71e1e60cdd7.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The discovery that Epstein-related documents were shredded during an active investigation severely weakens the credibility of the official narrative. The directive language—“make sure you get that box too”—points to intentional, targeted destruction...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The discovery that Epstein-related documents were shredded during an active investigation severely weakens the credibility of the official narrative. The directive language—“make sure you get that box too”—points to intentional, targeted destruction rather than routine procedure, especially given that oversight officials were present at the time. This behavior does not align with a story built on negligence and bureaucratic failure. Instead, it introduces evidence of deliberate decision-making, suggesting that certain materials were removed because of their potential impact. When placed alongside the known irregularities—camera failures, falsified logs, and procedural lapses—the destruction of documents shifts the case away from coincidence and toward a pattern of controlled outcomes.<br /><br />Once parts of the evidentiary record are intentionally destroyed, the integrity of the entire investigation is compromised. Missing documents mean missing connections—timelines, communications, and accountability chains that can no longer be reconstructed. This creates permanent gaps that prevent any conclusion from being considered complete or definitive. Rather than reinforcing the official explanation, the destruction of evidence raises new questions about what was removed and why. As a result, the case no longer supports a simple narrative of failure, but instead suggests that the scope of what could be known was actively limited.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>999</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Jeffrey Epstein, Prince Andrew And Their Stroll In Central Park</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/jeffrey-epstein-prince-andrew-and-their-stroll-in-central-park--72438811</link><description><![CDATA[In December 2010, Prince Andrew was photographed taking a casual stroll through New York’s Central Park alongside Jeffrey Epstein—just days after Epstein had completed a 13-month jail sentence for soliciting sex from a minor. The image, captured by a paparazzo and later published globally, showed the Duke of York walking shoulder-to-shoulder with a convicted sex offender, deep in conversation. The timing of the meeting and the relaxed nature of their interaction sent shockwaves through Buckingham Palace and ignited a public firestorm, as it contradicted any attempt to downplay the depth of Andrew’s relationship with Epstein. Far from a mere social encounter, this post-prison rendezvous strongly implied that Andrew maintained ties with Epstein even after his crimes were widely known.<br /><br /><br />The photograph became a defining symbol of the scandal surrounding Prince Andrew, undercutting any narrative that he had distanced himself from Epstein after the latter’s conviction. The optics were damning: a senior member of the British royal family publicly associating with a man now globally recognized as a serial predator. What made it even more damaging was that the meeting wasn’t a brief, unavoidable encounter—it reportedly took place over several days, during a stay at Epstein’s $77 million Manhattan townhouse. That visit, combined with the Central Park stroll, cemented suspicions that Andrew either underestimated the gravity of Epstein’s crimes or simply didn’t care, both of which would later contribute to his disastrous BBC Newsnight interview and eventual withdrawal from royal duties.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br />https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/royals/jeffrey-epstein-wanted-park-pic-28051494<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72438811</guid><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72438811/andyepsteincentralpark.mp3" length="13457075" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a6083b8c-69f0-4916-bd62-bf13e9759ae3/a6083b8c-69f0-4916-bd62-bf13e9759ae3.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a6083b8c-69f0-4916-bd62-bf13e9759ae3/a6083b8c-69f0-4916-bd62-bf13e9759ae3.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a6083b8c-69f0-4916-bd62-bf13e9759ae3/a6083b8c-69f0-4916-bd62-bf13e9759ae3.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In December 2010, Prince Andrew was photographed taking a casual stroll through New York’s Central Park alongside Jeffrey Epstein—just days after Epstein had completed a 13-month jail sentence for soliciting sex from a minor. The image, captured by a...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In December 2010, Prince Andrew was photographed taking a casual stroll through New York’s Central Park alongside Jeffrey Epstein—just days after Epstein had completed a 13-month jail sentence for soliciting sex from a minor. The image, captured by a paparazzo and later published globally, showed the Duke of York walking shoulder-to-shoulder with a convicted sex offender, deep in conversation. The timing of the meeting and the relaxed nature of their interaction sent shockwaves through Buckingham Palace and ignited a public firestorm, as it contradicted any attempt to downplay the depth of Andrew’s relationship with Epstein. Far from a mere social encounter, this post-prison rendezvous strongly implied that Andrew maintained ties with Epstein even after his crimes were widely known.<br /><br /><br />The photograph became a defining symbol of the scandal surrounding Prince Andrew, undercutting any narrative that he had distanced himself from Epstein after the latter’s conviction. The optics were damning: a senior member of the British royal family publicly associating with a man now globally recognized as a serial predator. What made it even more damaging was that the meeting wasn’t a brief, unavoidable encounter—it reportedly took place over several days, during a stay at Epstein’s $77 million Manhattan townhouse. That visit, combined with the Central Park stroll, cemented suspicions that Andrew either underestimated the gravity of Epstein’s crimes or simply didn’t care, both of which would later contribute to his disastrous BBC Newsnight interview and eventual withdrawal from royal duties.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br />https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/royals/jeffrey-epstein-wanted-park-pic-28051494<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>842</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Darren Indyke’s Testimony: Denials, Contradictions, and the Expanding Epstein Investigation</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/darren-indyke-s-testimony-denials-contradictions-and-the-expanding-epstein-investigation--72324211</link><description><![CDATA[Darren Indyke, Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime personal attorney and co-executor of his estate, testified before the House Oversight Committee that he had “no knowledge whatsoever” of Epstein’s sexual abuse or trafficking activities during the decades he worked for him. He described his role as limited to legal and business matters—handling corporate, transactional, and general legal services—and insisted he neither witnessed misconduct nor was ever informed of it. Indyke also claimed he did not socialize with Epstein and said that if he had known about the abuse, he would have immediately cut ties.<br /><br />During the testimony, Indyke acknowledged continuing to work with Epstein even after his 2008 conviction, saying Epstein appeared remorseful and assured him the behavior would not happen again—an explanation he now says he regrets believing. Lawmakers, particularly Democrats, reacted with skepticism, criticizing his answers as defensive and raising concerns that he and others may have helped shield Epstein’s activities. The deposition is part of a broader, increasingly contentious congressional investigation into Epstein’s network, with ongoing demands for more documents, including potential evidence such as hard drives tied to Epstein’s operations.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.cnn.com/2026/03/19/politics/darren-indyke-jeffrey-epstein-testimony" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Darren Indyke, Epstein attorney, denies knowledge of financier’s sexual abuse | CNN Politics</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72324211</guid><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72324211/indyketestimony.mp3" length="17194466" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d12dd446-0d40-4773-9a4e-b94a76a0ea35/d12dd446-0d40-4773-9a4e-b94a76a0ea35.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d12dd446-0d40-4773-9a4e-b94a76a0ea35/d12dd446-0d40-4773-9a4e-b94a76a0ea35.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d12dd446-0d40-4773-9a4e-b94a76a0ea35/d12dd446-0d40-4773-9a4e-b94a76a0ea35.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Darren Indyke, Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime personal attorney and co-executor of his estate, testified before the House Oversight Committee that he had “no knowledge whatsoever” of Epstein’s sexual abuse or trafficking activities during the decades he...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Darren Indyke, Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime personal attorney and co-executor of his estate, testified before the House Oversight Committee that he had “no knowledge whatsoever” of Epstein’s sexual abuse or trafficking activities during the decades he worked for him. He described his role as limited to legal and business matters—handling corporate, transactional, and general legal services—and insisted he neither witnessed misconduct nor was ever informed of it. Indyke also claimed he did not socialize with Epstein and said that if he had known about the abuse, he would have immediately cut ties.<br /><br />During the testimony, Indyke acknowledged continuing to work with Epstein even after his 2008 conviction, saying Epstein appeared remorseful and assured him the behavior would not happen again—an explanation he now says he regrets believing. Lawmakers, particularly Democrats, reacted with skepticism, criticizing his answers as defensive and raising concerns that he and others may have helped shield Epstein’s activities. The deposition is part of a broader, increasingly contentious congressional investigation into Epstein’s network, with ongoing demands for more documents, including potential evidence such as hard drives tied to Epstein’s operations.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.cnn.com/2026/03/19/politics/darren-indyke-jeffrey-epstein-testimony" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Darren Indyke, Epstein attorney, denies knowledge of financier’s sexual abuse | CNN Politics</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1075</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Wall Street Ties Raise Questions for Prosecutors Overseeing Epstein-Linked Matters</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/wall-street-ties-raise-questions-for-prosecutors-overseeing-epstein-linked-matters--72324193</link><description><![CDATA[Concerns have emerged over potential conflicts of interest involving Jay Clayton, the interim U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, whose office has jurisdiction over major financial crimes and historically handled cases connected to Jeffrey Epstein. Financial disclosures show Clayton holds more than $1.6 million in investments tied to large financial institutions and corporations. Because the Southern District has been involved in matters touching Epstein’s financial network and Wall Street entities, the holdings have raised questions about whether a prosecutor responsible for overseeing powerful financial investigations should maintain personal investments connected to the same sectors that may fall under federal scrutiny.<br /><br />The situation has fueled criticism about the broader system linking elite finance, corporate law, and federal prosecution. Clayton moved from private corporate law into government leadership roles and then into one of the most powerful prosecutorial positions in the country, illustrating how figures within the same financial and legal networks often rotate between regulatory agencies, private industry, and law enforcement. Critics argue that these overlapping relationships create an environment where investigations into powerful financial actors—including those connected to the Epstein scandal—are overseen by individuals who are themselves embedded within the same financial ecosystem.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://jacobin.com/2026/03/corruption-epstein-venezuela-us-attorney-trump" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The “Epstein Class” Investigates Itself</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72324193</guid><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72324193/wallstreettiesraisequestions.mp3" length="18482199" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/aa5911ca-1ac4-49a3-b123-030b717b5931/aa5911ca-1ac4-49a3-b123-030b717b5931.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/aa5911ca-1ac4-49a3-b123-030b717b5931/aa5911ca-1ac4-49a3-b123-030b717b5931.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/aa5911ca-1ac4-49a3-b123-030b717b5931/aa5911ca-1ac4-49a3-b123-030b717b5931.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Concerns have emerged over potential conflicts of interest involving Jay Clayton, the interim U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, whose office has jurisdiction over major financial crimes and historically handled cases connected to...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Concerns have emerged over potential conflicts of interest involving Jay Clayton, the interim U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, whose office has jurisdiction over major financial crimes and historically handled cases connected to Jeffrey Epstein. Financial disclosures show Clayton holds more than $1.6 million in investments tied to large financial institutions and corporations. Because the Southern District has been involved in matters touching Epstein’s financial network and Wall Street entities, the holdings have raised questions about whether a prosecutor responsible for overseeing powerful financial investigations should maintain personal investments connected to the same sectors that may fall under federal scrutiny.<br /><br />The situation has fueled criticism about the broader system linking elite finance, corporate law, and federal prosecution. Clayton moved from private corporate law into government leadership roles and then into one of the most powerful prosecutorial positions in the country, illustrating how figures within the same financial and legal networks often rotate between regulatory agencies, private industry, and law enforcement. Critics argue that these overlapping relationships create an environment where investigations into powerful financial actors—including those connected to the Epstein scandal—are overseen by individuals who are themselves embedded within the same financial ecosystem.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://jacobin.com/2026/03/corruption-epstein-venezuela-us-attorney-trump" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The “Epstein Class” Investigates Itself</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1156</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Lesley Groff Faces Congress Over Her Role in Epstein’s Operation (6/9/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/lesley-groff-faces-congress-over-her-role-in-epstein-s-operation-6-9-26--72441637</link><description><![CDATA[Lesley Groff, Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime executive assistant, is set to testify before the House Oversight and Reform Committee as lawmakers continue digging through Epstein-related records and questioning people who worked inside his operation. Groff worked for Epstein for nearly 20 years, from 2001 until his July 2019 arrest, and told the FBI in 2021 that she was hired after a headhunter described the position as a job to “organize one man’s life.” According to FBI notes cited in the report, her duties included scheduling meetings, making calls, coordinating with Epstein’s driver, chef, and other staff, and managing much of his daily calendar. Those same notes say massage appointments were a routine part of Epstein’s day, and Groff described booking them as just another scheduling task.<br /><br />Groff’s testimony matters because her name has long sat in one of the most contested parts of the Epstein record: the category of employees and associates who may have had knowledge of how the abuse network functioned. She was among the women identified as possible co-conspirators and granted immunity under Epstein’s controversial Florida non-prosecution agreement, though she has never been criminally charged and her lawyers have repeatedly denied that she knowingly participated in Epstein’s crimes. The Guardian also notes that an FBI document from 2019 listed Groff among possible co-conspirators, while her lawyer said she was never told law enforcement considered her one and was informed after voluntarily answering prosecutors’ questions that she would not be prosecuted. Survivors have accused her in civil litigation of helping facilitate abuse, but those claims against her were later dismissed, leaving her testimony as another key attempt by Congress to understand who inside Epstein’s operation knew what, when they knew it, and how much they helped keep the machine running.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/09/jeffrey-epstein-assistant-lesley-groff-testifies" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jeffrey Epstein assistant Lesley Groff set to testify before House panel | Jeffrey Epstein | The Guardian</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72441637</guid><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72441637/groffsettotestify.mp3" length="13340465" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7ac2b00d-ff0e-4936-9415-05ff891d13a8/7ac2b00d-ff0e-4936-9415-05ff891d13a8.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7ac2b00d-ff0e-4936-9415-05ff891d13a8/7ac2b00d-ff0e-4936-9415-05ff891d13a8.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7ac2b00d-ff0e-4936-9415-05ff891d13a8/7ac2b00d-ff0e-4936-9415-05ff891d13a8.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Lesley Groff, Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime executive assistant, is set to testify before the House Oversight and Reform Committee as lawmakers continue digging through Epstein-related records and questioning people who worked inside his operation. Groff...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Lesley Groff, Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime executive assistant, is set to testify before the House Oversight and Reform Committee as lawmakers continue digging through Epstein-related records and questioning people who worked inside his operation. Groff worked for Epstein for nearly 20 years, from 2001 until his July 2019 arrest, and told the FBI in 2021 that she was hired after a headhunter described the position as a job to “organize one man’s life.” According to FBI notes cited in the report, her duties included scheduling meetings, making calls, coordinating with Epstein’s driver, chef, and other staff, and managing much of his daily calendar. Those same notes say massage appointments were a routine part of Epstein’s day, and Groff described booking them as just another scheduling task.<br /><br />Groff’s testimony matters because her name has long sat in one of the most contested parts of the Epstein record: the category of employees and associates who may have had knowledge of how the abuse network functioned. She was among the women identified as possible co-conspirators and granted immunity under Epstein’s controversial Florida non-prosecution agreement, though she has never been criminally charged and her lawyers have repeatedly denied that she knowingly participated in Epstein’s crimes. The Guardian also notes that an FBI document from 2019 listed Groff among possible co-conspirators, while her lawyer said she was never told law enforcement considered her one and was informed after voluntarily answering prosecutors’ questions that she would not be prosecuted. Survivors have accused her in civil litigation of helping facilitate abuse, but those claims against her were later dismissed, leaving her testimony as another key attempt by Congress to understand who inside Epstein’s operation knew what, when they knew it, and how much they helped keep the machine running.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/09/jeffrey-epstein-assistant-lesley-groff-testifies" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jeffrey Epstein assistant Lesley Groff set to testify before House panel | Jeffrey Epstein | The Guardian</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>834</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>George W. Bush’s DOJ Drawn Into Epstein Sweetheart Deal Fallout (6/10/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/george-w-bush-s-doj-drawn-into-epstein-sweetheart-deal-fallout-6-10-26--72441540</link><description><![CDATA[The new reporting centers on former Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter, who launched the original mid-2000s investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and says the case was undermined once federal prosecutors took control. According to the account, Reiter’s department had gathered evidence from roughly two dozen alleged victims and their families, only to see the matter drift toward the now-infamous 2007 secret plea negotiations led by then-U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta. The key political connection is that Acosta’s office was operating under George W. Bush’s Department of Justice, and Reiter says Acosta told him that “Main Justice” in Washington was providing guidance while Epstein’s defense team was successfully stalling the case.<br /><br />That detail matters because it pushes scrutiny beyond Acosta alone and back toward DOJ leadership in Washington during the Bush administration, where the Epstein deal was being handled as more than a routine local prosecution. Epstein ultimately avoided federal sex-trafficking charges at the time and pleaded guilty in state court to solicitation-related charges, despite investigators having identified dozens of possible victims. The account also revisits the explosive claim that Acosta later told Trump transition officials he had been told Epstein “belonged to intelligence” and to leave the case alone, a statement that has long fueled questions about who protected Epstein, why the original case was buried, and how many people in power helped turn a sprawling abuse investigation into a sweetheart deal.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.thedailybeast.com/explosive-report-drags-president-george-w-bush-into-jeffrey-epstein-scandal/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Explosive Report Drags President George W. Bush Into Jeffrey Epstein Scandal</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72441540</guid><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 20:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72441540/epsteindealcutbymainjustice.mp3" length="11279508" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ae62addc-636a-41ee-b472-408da8f991d8/ae62addc-636a-41ee-b472-408da8f991d8.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ae62addc-636a-41ee-b472-408da8f991d8/ae62addc-636a-41ee-b472-408da8f991d8.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ae62addc-636a-41ee-b472-408da8f991d8/ae62addc-636a-41ee-b472-408da8f991d8.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The new reporting centers on former Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter, who launched the original mid-2000s investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and says the case was undermined once federal prosecutors took control. According to the account,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The new reporting centers on former Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter, who launched the original mid-2000s investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and says the case was undermined once federal prosecutors took control. According to the account, Reiter’s department had gathered evidence from roughly two dozen alleged victims and their families, only to see the matter drift toward the now-infamous 2007 secret plea negotiations led by then-U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta. The key political connection is that Acosta’s office was operating under George W. Bush’s Department of Justice, and Reiter says Acosta told him that “Main Justice” in Washington was providing guidance while Epstein’s defense team was successfully stalling the case.<br /><br />That detail matters because it pushes scrutiny beyond Acosta alone and back toward DOJ leadership in Washington during the Bush administration, where the Epstein deal was being handled as more than a routine local prosecution. Epstein ultimately avoided federal sex-trafficking charges at the time and pleaded guilty in state court to solicitation-related charges, despite investigators having identified dozens of possible victims. The account also revisits the explosive claim that Acosta later told Trump transition officials he had been told Epstein “belonged to intelligence” and to leave the case alone, a statement that has long fueled questions about who protected Epstein, why the original case was buried, and how many people in power helped turn a sprawling abuse investigation into a sweetheart deal.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.thedailybeast.com/explosive-report-drags-president-george-w-bush-into-jeffrey-epstein-scandal/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Explosive Report Drags President George W. Bush Into Jeffrey Epstein Scandal</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>705</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Tova Noel Denies Being Orange Shape Seen Near Epstein’s Cell (6/9/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/tova-noel-denies-being-orange-shape-seen-near-epstein-s-cell-6-9-26--72428833</link><description><![CDATA[Former correction officer Tova Noel testified before the House Oversight Committee that she was not the orange-colored shape seen moving near the stairs to Jeffrey Epstein’s cell tier around 10:39 p.m. on August 9, 2019, the night before Epstein was found dead at the Metropolitan Correctional Center. Noel said she never returned to the tier at that time, was not carrying anything orange, and did not issue anything orange to anyone in the Special Housing Unit. That denial matters because the Justice Department Inspector General had suggested the shape was likely Noel, while an FBI video log had reportedly described it as possibly an inmate — something that would have been highly unusual at that hour. The footage remains especially important because, due to a hard-drive failure, most cameras in the unit were not recording that night, leaving only a partial camera view of the stairs leading to Epstein’s tier.<br /><br /><br />Noel acknowledged that she and fellow officer Michael Thomas failed to conduct required inmate rounds and counts, but she denied having anything to do with Epstein’s death or any conspiracy surrounding it. She said she did not know who Epstein was when he arrived in the SHU, was unaware of certain special conditions tied to his confinement, and had not seen the posted notice requiring 30-minute rounds. She also rejected questions about cash deposits, saying the money came from personal savings and had no connection to Epstein, and denied an allegation from released Justice Department records claiming she and Thomas were paid to neglect their duties so someone could enter Epstein’s cell and kill him. Her testimony leaves the “orange shape” unresolved and adds another unanswered question to a night already defined by failed checks, broken cameras, missing clarity, and official explanations that continue to leave major gaps.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/correction-officer-testifies-she-was-not-orange-shape-seen-outside-jeffrey-epstein-cell/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Correction officer testifies she was not the orange shape seen near Jeffrey Epstein's cell the night he died - CBS News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72428833</guid><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 18:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72428833/noeldeniesorangeblob.mp3" length="15772987" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f7f54e3c-c902-4452-aded-2f3eba88f1d2/f7f54e3c-c902-4452-aded-2f3eba88f1d2.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f7f54e3c-c902-4452-aded-2f3eba88f1d2/f7f54e3c-c902-4452-aded-2f3eba88f1d2.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f7f54e3c-c902-4452-aded-2f3eba88f1d2/f7f54e3c-c902-4452-aded-2f3eba88f1d2.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Former correction officer Tova Noel testified before the House Oversight Committee that she was not the orange-colored shape seen moving near the stairs to Jeffrey Epstein’s cell tier around 10:39 p.m. on August 9, 2019, the night before Epstein was...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Former correction officer Tova Noel testified before the House Oversight Committee that she was not the orange-colored shape seen moving near the stairs to Jeffrey Epstein’s cell tier around 10:39 p.m. on August 9, 2019, the night before Epstein was found dead at the Metropolitan Correctional Center. Noel said she never returned to the tier at that time, was not carrying anything orange, and did not issue anything orange to anyone in the Special Housing Unit. That denial matters because the Justice Department Inspector General had suggested the shape was likely Noel, while an FBI video log had reportedly described it as possibly an inmate — something that would have been highly unusual at that hour. The footage remains especially important because, due to a hard-drive failure, most cameras in the unit were not recording that night, leaving only a partial camera view of the stairs leading to Epstein’s tier.<br /><br /><br />Noel acknowledged that she and fellow officer Michael Thomas failed to conduct required inmate rounds and counts, but she denied having anything to do with Epstein’s death or any conspiracy surrounding it. She said she did not know who Epstein was when he arrived in the SHU, was unaware of certain special conditions tied to his confinement, and had not seen the posted notice requiring 30-minute rounds. She also rejected questions about cash deposits, saying the money came from personal savings and had no connection to Epstein, and denied an allegation from released Justice Department records claiming she and Thomas were paid to neglect their duties so someone could enter Epstein’s cell and kill him. Her testimony leaves the “orange shape” unresolved and adds another unanswered question to a night already defined by failed checks, broken cameras, missing clarity, and official explanations that continue to leave major gaps.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/correction-officer-testifies-she-was-not-orange-shape-seen-outside-jeffrey-epstein-cell/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Correction officer testifies she was not the orange shape seen near Jeffrey Epstein's cell the night he died - CBS News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>986</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>George W. Bush’s DOJ Drawn Into Epstein Sweetheart Deal Fallout (6/9/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/george-w-bush-s-doj-drawn-into-epstein-sweetheart-deal-fallout-6-9-26--72428831</link><description><![CDATA[The new reporting centers on former Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter, who launched the original mid-2000s investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and says the case was undermined once federal prosecutors took control. According to the account, Reiter’s department had gathered evidence from roughly two dozen alleged victims and their families, only to see the matter drift toward the now-infamous 2007 secret plea negotiations led by then-U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta. The key political connection is that Acosta’s office was operating under George W. Bush’s Department of Justice, and Reiter says Acosta told him that “Main Justice” in Washington was providing guidance while Epstein’s defense team was successfully stalling the case.<br /><br />That detail matters because it pushes scrutiny beyond Acosta alone and back toward DOJ leadership in Washington during the Bush administration, where the Epstein deal was being handled as more than a routine local prosecution. Epstein ultimately avoided federal sex-trafficking charges at the time and pleaded guilty in state court to solicitation-related charges, despite investigators having identified dozens of possible victims. The account also revisits the explosive claim that Acosta later told Trump transition officials he had been told Epstein “belonged to intelligence” and to leave the case alone, a statement that has long fueled questions about who protected Epstein, why the original case was buried, and how many people in power helped turn a sprawling abuse investigation into a sweetheart deal.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.thedailybeast.com/explosive-report-drags-president-george-w-bush-into-jeffrey-epstein-scandal/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Explosive Report Drags President George W. Bush Into Jeffrey Epstein Scandal</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72428831</guid><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72428831/epsteindealcutbymainjustice.mp3" length="11279508" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/662369a7-5990-43cc-99c5-d0352315abe3/662369a7-5990-43cc-99c5-d0352315abe3.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/662369a7-5990-43cc-99c5-d0352315abe3/662369a7-5990-43cc-99c5-d0352315abe3.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/662369a7-5990-43cc-99c5-d0352315abe3/662369a7-5990-43cc-99c5-d0352315abe3.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The new reporting centers on former Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter, who launched the original mid-2000s investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and says the case was undermined once federal prosecutors took control. According to the account,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The new reporting centers on former Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter, who launched the original mid-2000s investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and says the case was undermined once federal prosecutors took control. According to the account, Reiter’s department had gathered evidence from roughly two dozen alleged victims and their families, only to see the matter drift toward the now-infamous 2007 secret plea negotiations led by then-U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta. The key political connection is that Acosta’s office was operating under George W. Bush’s Department of Justice, and Reiter says Acosta told him that “Main Justice” in Washington was providing guidance while Epstein’s defense team was successfully stalling the case.<br /><br />That detail matters because it pushes scrutiny beyond Acosta alone and back toward DOJ leadership in Washington during the Bush administration, where the Epstein deal was being handled as more than a routine local prosecution. Epstein ultimately avoided federal sex-trafficking charges at the time and pleaded guilty in state court to solicitation-related charges, despite investigators having identified dozens of possible victims. The account also revisits the explosive claim that Acosta later told Trump transition officials he had been told Epstein “belonged to intelligence” and to leave the case alone, a statement that has long fueled questions about who protected Epstein, why the original case was buried, and how many people in power helped turn a sprawling abuse investigation into a sweetheart deal.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.thedailybeast.com/explosive-report-drags-president-george-w-bush-into-jeffrey-epstein-scandal/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Explosive Report Drags President George W. Bush Into Jeffrey Epstein Scandal</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>705</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Pam Bondi Congressional Oversight Committee Epstein Related Transcript (Part 7) (6/9/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-pam-bondi-congressional-oversight-committee-epstein-related-transcript-part-7-6-9-26--72428834</link><description><![CDATA[Pam Bondi’s congressional transcript showed her trying to defend the Justice Department’s handling of the Epstein files while repeatedly distancing herself from the day-to-day mechanics of the review. She told House Oversight lawmakers that Todd Blanche was the official “in charge” of the Epstein records process, saying she did not personally conduct the document review and that the work had been delegated to him. Bondi acknowledged that mistakes were made, including redaction problems, but framed the release as a massive and difficult undertaking rather than a deliberate attempt to obstruct transparency. At the same time, she insisted the department was committed to accountability, even as lawmakers pressed her on why the disclosures remained incomplete, flawed, or slow-moving.<br /><br />The transcript also showed Bondi trying to avoid directly blaming Blanche while making clear that he was the person managing the release. She praised him as ethical and capable, but Democrats seized on her answers as evidence that Blanche, along with other DOJ and FBI officials, should be brought before Congress to explain the process in detail. Bondi also said she learned about Ghislaine Maxwell’s prison transfer from news reports, denied involvement in that decision, rejected the idea of a Maxwell pardon, and refused to discuss private conversations with Donald Trump. The result was a transcript that did not settle the Epstein files controversy, but instead widened the accountability fight by making clear that Congress still does not have a clean answer on who controlled the review, why errors happened, and whether the public has truly received the full record.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Final-Bondi-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Final-Bondi-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72428834</guid><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72428834/bonditranscripts7.mp3" length="15221281" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ae5d4e3f-e893-4724-b387-20d41b38fec6/ae5d4e3f-e893-4724-b387-20d41b38fec6.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ae5d4e3f-e893-4724-b387-20d41b38fec6/ae5d4e3f-e893-4724-b387-20d41b38fec6.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ae5d4e3f-e893-4724-b387-20d41b38fec6/ae5d4e3f-e893-4724-b387-20d41b38fec6.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Pam Bondi’s congressional transcript showed her trying to defend the Justice Department’s handling of the Epstein files while repeatedly distancing herself from the day-to-day mechanics of the review. She told House Oversight lawmakers that Todd...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Pam Bondi’s congressional transcript showed her trying to defend the Justice Department’s handling of the Epstein files while repeatedly distancing herself from the day-to-day mechanics of the review. She told House Oversight lawmakers that Todd Blanche was the official “in charge” of the Epstein records process, saying she did not personally conduct the document review and that the work had been delegated to him. Bondi acknowledged that mistakes were made, including redaction problems, but framed the release as a massive and difficult undertaking rather than a deliberate attempt to obstruct transparency. At the same time, she insisted the department was committed to accountability, even as lawmakers pressed her on why the disclosures remained incomplete, flawed, or slow-moving.<br /><br />The transcript also showed Bondi trying to avoid directly blaming Blanche while making clear that he was the person managing the release. She praised him as ethical and capable, but Democrats seized on her answers as evidence that Blanche, along with other DOJ and FBI officials, should be brought before Congress to explain the process in detail. Bondi also said she learned about Ghislaine Maxwell’s prison transfer from news reports, denied involvement in that decision, rejected the idea of a Maxwell pardon, and refused to discuss private conversations with Donald Trump. The result was a transcript that did not settle the Epstein files controversy, but instead widened the accountability fight by making clear that Congress still does not have a clean answer on who controlled the review, why errors happened, and whether the public has truly received the full record.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Final-Bondi-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Final-Bondi-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>952</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Pam Bondi Congressional Oversight Committee Epstein Related Transcript (Part 6) (6/9/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-pam-bondi-congressional-oversight-committee-epstein-related-transcript-part-6-6-9-26--72428835</link><description><![CDATA[Pam Bondi’s congressional transcript showed her trying to defend the Justice Department’s handling of the Epstein files while repeatedly distancing herself from the day-to-day mechanics of the review. She told House Oversight lawmakers that Todd Blanche was the official “in charge” of the Epstein records process, saying she did not personally conduct the document review and that the work had been delegated to him. Bondi acknowledged that mistakes were made, including redaction problems, but framed the release as a massive and difficult undertaking rather than a deliberate attempt to obstruct transparency. At the same time, she insisted the department was committed to accountability, even as lawmakers pressed her on why the disclosures remained incomplete, flawed, or slow-moving.<br /><br />The transcript also showed Bondi trying to avoid directly blaming Blanche while making clear that he was the person managing the release. She praised him as ethical and capable, but Democrats seized on her answers as evidence that Blanche, along with other DOJ and FBI officials, should be brought before Congress to explain the process in detail. Bondi also said she learned about Ghislaine Maxwell’s prison transfer from news reports, denied involvement in that decision, rejected the idea of a Maxwell pardon, and refused to discuss private conversations with Donald Trump. The result was a transcript that did not settle the Epstein files controversy, but instead widened the accountability fight by making clear that Congress still does not have a clean answer on who controlled the review, why errors happened, and whether the public has truly received the full record.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Final-Bondi-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Final-Bondi-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72428835</guid><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 12:30:28 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72428835/bonditranscripts6.mp3" length="12764935" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4710fc0f-f8b5-4b9b-8b70-796c743067b9/4710fc0f-f8b5-4b9b-8b70-796c743067b9.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4710fc0f-f8b5-4b9b-8b70-796c743067b9/4710fc0f-f8b5-4b9b-8b70-796c743067b9.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4710fc0f-f8b5-4b9b-8b70-796c743067b9/4710fc0f-f8b5-4b9b-8b70-796c743067b9.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Pam Bondi’s congressional transcript showed her trying to defend the Justice Department’s handling of the Epstein files while repeatedly distancing herself from the day-to-day mechanics of the review. She told House Oversight lawmakers that Todd...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Pam Bondi’s congressional transcript showed her trying to defend the Justice Department’s handling of the Epstein files while repeatedly distancing herself from the day-to-day mechanics of the review. She told House Oversight lawmakers that Todd Blanche was the official “in charge” of the Epstein records process, saying she did not personally conduct the document review and that the work had been delegated to him. Bondi acknowledged that mistakes were made, including redaction problems, but framed the release as a massive and difficult undertaking rather than a deliberate attempt to obstruct transparency. At the same time, she insisted the department was committed to accountability, even as lawmakers pressed her on why the disclosures remained incomplete, flawed, or slow-moving.<br /><br />The transcript also showed Bondi trying to avoid directly blaming Blanche while making clear that he was the person managing the release. She praised him as ethical and capable, but Democrats seized on her answers as evidence that Blanche, along with other DOJ and FBI officials, should be brought before Congress to explain the process in detail. Bondi also said she learned about Ghislaine Maxwell’s prison transfer from news reports, denied involvement in that decision, rejected the idea of a Maxwell pardon, and refused to discuss private conversations with Donald Trump. The result was a transcript that did not settle the Epstein files controversy, but instead widened the accountability fight by making clear that Congress still does not have a clean answer on who controlled the review, why errors happened, and whether the public has truly received the full record.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Final-Bondi-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Final-Bondi-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>798</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Transcripts From The DOJ's Sit Down With Ghislaine Maxwell (Part 16-18) (6/8/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-transcripts-from-the-doj-s-sit-down-with-ghislaine-maxwell-part-16-18-6-8-26--72421823</link><description><![CDATA[On August 22, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice released redacted transcripts and audio recordings of a two-day interview it conducted in July with Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year federal prison sentence for her role in Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking ring. During the interview, Maxwell denied ever seeing any inappropriate behavior by former President Donald Trump, describing him as a “gentleman in all respects,” and insisted she “never witnessed the president in any inappropriate setting in any way.” She also rejected the existence of a so-called “client list,” countering years of speculation, and claimed to have no knowledge of blackmail or illicit recordings tied to Epstein.<br /><br />In addition to defending high-profile figures, Maxwell expressed doubt that Epstein’s death was a suicide, while also rejecting the notion of an elaborate conspiracy or murder plot. The release of the transcripts—handled under the Trump-era Justice Department—has stirred sharp political debate. Trump allies have framed her remarks as vindication, while critics and Epstein’s survivors question her credibility, pointing to her conviction and suggesting her words may be aimed at influencing potential clemency or political favor.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/storage/audio-files/Interview%20Transcript/Interview%20Transcript%20-%20Maxwell%202025.07.24%20(Redacted).pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Interview Transcript - Maxwell 2025.07.24 (Redacted).pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72421823</guid><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 10:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72421823/megamaxtranscripts16n17n18.mp3" length="47241552" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/25b7a017-ac3d-4964-8ee7-9cd42ff9f9e4/25b7a017-ac3d-4964-8ee7-9cd42ff9f9e4.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/25b7a017-ac3d-4964-8ee7-9cd42ff9f9e4/25b7a017-ac3d-4964-8ee7-9cd42ff9f9e4.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/25b7a017-ac3d-4964-8ee7-9cd42ff9f9e4/25b7a017-ac3d-4964-8ee7-9cd42ff9f9e4.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On August 22, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice released redacted transcripts and audio recordings of a two-day interview it conducted in July with Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year federal prison sentence for her role in Jeffrey...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On August 22, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice released redacted transcripts and audio recordings of a two-day interview it conducted in July with Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year federal prison sentence for her role in Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking ring. During the interview, Maxwell denied ever seeing any inappropriate behavior by former President Donald Trump, describing him as a “gentleman in all respects,” and insisted she “never witnessed the president in any inappropriate setting in any way.” She also rejected the existence of a so-called “client list,” countering years of speculation, and claimed to have no knowledge of blackmail or illicit recordings tied to Epstein.<br /><br />In addition to defending high-profile figures, Maxwell expressed doubt that Epstein’s death was a suicide, while also rejecting the notion of an elaborate conspiracy or murder plot. The release of the transcripts—handled under the Trump-era Justice Department—has stirred sharp political debate. Trump allies have framed her remarks as vindication, while critics and Epstein’s survivors question her credibility, pointing to her conviction and suggesting her words may be aimed at influencing potential clemency or political favor.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/storage/audio-files/Interview%20Transcript/Interview%20Transcript%20-%20Maxwell%202025.07.24%20(Redacted).pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Interview Transcript - Maxwell 2025.07.24 (Redacted).pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2953</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Transcripts From The DOJ's Sit Down With Ghislaine Maxwell (Part 13-15) (6/8/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-transcripts-from-the-doj-s-sit-down-with-ghislaine-maxwell-part-13-15-6-8-26--72421815</link><description><![CDATA[On August 22, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice released redacted transcripts and audio recordings of a two-day interview it conducted in July with Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year federal prison sentence for her role in Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking ring. During the interview, Maxwell denied ever seeing any inappropriate behavior by former President Donald Trump, describing him as a “gentleman in all respects,” and insisted she “never witnessed the president in any inappropriate setting in any way.” She also rejected the existence of a so-called “client list,” countering years of speculation, and claimed to have no knowledge of blackmail or illicit recordings tied to Epstein.<br /><br />In addition to defending high-profile figures, Maxwell expressed doubt that Epstein’s death was a suicide, while also rejecting the notion of an elaborate conspiracy or murder plot. The release of the transcripts—handled under the Trump-era Justice Department—has stirred sharp political debate. Trump allies have framed her remarks as vindication, while critics and Epstein’s survivors question her credibility, pointing to her conviction and suggesting her words may be aimed at influencing potential clemency or political favor.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/storage/audio-files/Interview%20Transcript/Interview%20Transcript%20-%20Maxwell%202025.07.24%20(Redacted).pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Interview Transcript - Maxwell 2025.07.24 (Redacted).pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72421815</guid><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 08:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72421815/megamaxtranscripts13n14n15.mp3" length="43176481" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e3405562-73d7-4cde-ba0a-09c6fa5e0bde/e3405562-73d7-4cde-ba0a-09c6fa5e0bde.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e3405562-73d7-4cde-ba0a-09c6fa5e0bde/e3405562-73d7-4cde-ba0a-09c6fa5e0bde.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e3405562-73d7-4cde-ba0a-09c6fa5e0bde/e3405562-73d7-4cde-ba0a-09c6fa5e0bde.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On August 22, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice released redacted transcripts and audio recordings of a two-day interview it conducted in July with Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year federal prison sentence for her role in Jeffrey...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On August 22, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice released redacted transcripts and audio recordings of a two-day interview it conducted in July with Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year federal prison sentence for her role in Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking ring. During the interview, Maxwell denied ever seeing any inappropriate behavior by former President Donald Trump, describing him as a “gentleman in all respects,” and insisted she “never witnessed the president in any inappropriate setting in any way.” She also rejected the existence of a so-called “client list,” countering years of speculation, and claimed to have no knowledge of blackmail or illicit recordings tied to Epstein.<br /><br />In addition to defending high-profile figures, Maxwell expressed doubt that Epstein’s death was a suicide, while also rejecting the notion of an elaborate conspiracy or murder plot. The release of the transcripts—handled under the Trump-era Justice Department—has stirred sharp political debate. Trump allies have framed her remarks as vindication, while critics and Epstein’s survivors question her credibility, pointing to her conviction and suggesting her words may be aimed at influencing potential clemency or political favor.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/storage/audio-files/Interview%20Transcript/Interview%20Transcript%20-%20Maxwell%202025.07.24%20(Redacted).pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Interview Transcript - Maxwell 2025.07.24 (Redacted).pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2699</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Transcripts From The DOJ's Sit Down With Ghislaine Maxwell (Part 10-12) (6/8/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-transcripts-from-the-doj-s-sit-down-with-ghislaine-maxwell-part-10-12-6-8-26--72421816</link><description><![CDATA[On August 22, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice released redacted transcripts and audio recordings of a two-day interview it conducted in July with Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year federal prison sentence for her role in Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking ring. During the interview, Maxwell denied ever seeing any inappropriate behavior by former President Donald Trump, describing him as a “gentleman in all respects,” and insisted she “never witnessed the president in any inappropriate setting in any way.” She also rejected the existence of a so-called “client list,” countering years of speculation, and claimed to have no knowledge of blackmail or illicit recordings tied to Epstein.<br /><br />In addition to defending high-profile figures, Maxwell expressed doubt that Epstein’s death was a suicide, while also rejecting the notion of an elaborate conspiracy or murder plot. The release of the transcripts—handled under the Trump-era Justice Department—has stirred sharp political debate. Trump allies have framed her remarks as vindication, while critics and Epstein’s survivors question her credibility, pointing to her conviction and suggesting her words may be aimed at influencing potential clemency or political favor.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/storage/audio-files/Interview%20Transcript/Interview%20Transcript%20-%20Maxwell%202025.07.24%20(Redacted).pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Interview Transcript - Maxwell 2025.07.24 (Redacted).pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72421816</guid><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 06:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72421816/megamaxwelltranscripts10n11n12.mp3" length="40295071" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4a8926f3-5beb-4835-be0b-4d7d2dae1fb1/4a8926f3-5beb-4835-be0b-4d7d2dae1fb1.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4a8926f3-5beb-4835-be0b-4d7d2dae1fb1/4a8926f3-5beb-4835-be0b-4d7d2dae1fb1.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4a8926f3-5beb-4835-be0b-4d7d2dae1fb1/4a8926f3-5beb-4835-be0b-4d7d2dae1fb1.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On August 22, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice released redacted transcripts and audio recordings of a two-day interview it conducted in July with Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year federal prison sentence for her role in Jeffrey...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On August 22, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice released redacted transcripts and audio recordings of a two-day interview it conducted in July with Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year federal prison sentence for her role in Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking ring. During the interview, Maxwell denied ever seeing any inappropriate behavior by former President Donald Trump, describing him as a “gentleman in all respects,” and insisted she “never witnessed the president in any inappropriate setting in any way.” She also rejected the existence of a so-called “client list,” countering years of speculation, and claimed to have no knowledge of blackmail or illicit recordings tied to Epstein.<br /><br />In addition to defending high-profile figures, Maxwell expressed doubt that Epstein’s death was a suicide, while also rejecting the notion of an elaborate conspiracy or murder plot. The release of the transcripts—handled under the Trump-era Justice Department—has stirred sharp political debate. Trump allies have framed her remarks as vindication, while critics and Epstein’s survivors question her credibility, pointing to her conviction and suggesting her words may be aimed at influencing potential clemency or political favor.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/storage/audio-files/Interview%20Transcript/Interview%20Transcript%20-%20Maxwell%202025.07.24%20(Redacted).pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Interview Transcript - Maxwell 2025.07.24 (Redacted).pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2519</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Ghislaine Maxwell Seeks A Summary Judgement Against Virginia Roberts (Part 4)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/ghislaine-maxwell-seeks-a-summary-judgement-against-virginia-roberts-part-4--72419599</link><description><![CDATA[In the defamation case Virginia Giuffre brought against Ghislaine Maxwell beginning in 2015, Maxwell responded with a motion for summary judgment—arguing that Giuffre’s allegations were not legally defamatory and that Maxwell was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. That motion aimed to avoid a trial by asserting that even if all of Giuffre’s allegations were true, they did not meet the legal threshold for defamation. The motion, along with supporting documents, was filed under seal during pre-trial proceedings. Ultimately, the district court did not grant the motion, and the case was later settled out of court under confidentiality terms in 2017.<br /><br /><br />When third parties later moved to unseal portions of the sealed record, particularly filings related to the summary judgment motion, the courts determined that these materials were judicial documents subject to a strong presumption of public access. A federal appeals court ordered their partial release because Maxwell had not shown sufficient reasons to overcome the public’s right of access. In other words, although Maxwell sought to dispose of the case quietly and legally via summary judgment—and shield that process from public view—those efforts were rejected, and important portions of the case were ultimately made part of the public record.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6250471-Epstein-Docs" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein Docs - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72419599</guid><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72419599/maxsupsum4.mp3" length="13388948" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1ae9a545-54d4-4803-80b7-bc29db44469e/1ae9a545-54d4-4803-80b7-bc29db44469e.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1ae9a545-54d4-4803-80b7-bc29db44469e/1ae9a545-54d4-4803-80b7-bc29db44469e.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1ae9a545-54d4-4803-80b7-bc29db44469e/1ae9a545-54d4-4803-80b7-bc29db44469e.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In the defamation case Virginia Giuffre brought against Ghislaine Maxwell beginning in 2015, Maxwell responded with a motion for summary judgment—arguing that Giuffre’s allegations were not legally defamatory and that Maxwell was entitled to judgment...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In the defamation case Virginia Giuffre brought against Ghislaine Maxwell beginning in 2015, Maxwell responded with a motion for summary judgment—arguing that Giuffre’s allegations were not legally defamatory and that Maxwell was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. That motion aimed to avoid a trial by asserting that even if all of Giuffre’s allegations were true, they did not meet the legal threshold for defamation. The motion, along with supporting documents, was filed under seal during pre-trial proceedings. Ultimately, the district court did not grant the motion, and the case was later settled out of court under confidentiality terms in 2017.<br /><br /><br />When third parties later moved to unseal portions of the sealed record, particularly filings related to the summary judgment motion, the courts determined that these materials were judicial documents subject to a strong presumption of public access. A federal appeals court ordered their partial release because Maxwell had not shown sufficient reasons to overcome the public’s right of access. In other words, although Maxwell sought to dispose of the case quietly and legally via summary judgment—and shield that process from public view—those efforts were rejected, and important portions of the case were ultimately made part of the public record.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6250471-Epstein-Docs" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein Docs - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>837</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Ghislaine Maxwell Seeks A Summary Judgement Against Virginia Roberts (Part 3)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/ghislaine-maxwell-seeks-a-summary-judgement-against-virginia-roberts-part-3--72419596</link><description><![CDATA[In the defamation case Virginia Giuffre brought against Ghislaine Maxwell beginning in 2015, Maxwell responded with a motion for summary judgment—arguing that Giuffre’s allegations were not legally defamatory and that Maxwell was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. That motion aimed to avoid a trial by asserting that even if all of Giuffre’s allegations were true, they did not meet the legal threshold for defamation. The motion, along with supporting documents, was filed under seal during pre-trial proceedings. Ultimately, the district court did not grant the motion, and the case was later settled out of court under confidentiality terms in 2017.<br /><br /><br />When third parties later moved to unseal portions of the sealed record, particularly filings related to the summary judgment motion, the courts determined that these materials were judicial documents subject to a strong presumption of public access. A federal appeals court ordered their partial release because Maxwell had not shown sufficient reasons to overcome the public’s right of access. In other words, although Maxwell sought to dispose of the case quietly and legally via summary judgment—and shield that process from public view—those efforts were rejected, and important portions of the case were ultimately made part of the public record.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6250471-Epstein-Docs" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein Docs - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72419596</guid><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 02:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72419596/memosupmaxjudge3.mp3" length="13932713" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/df07e42d-1f65-4b1e-b52b-745d0bfc6000/df07e42d-1f65-4b1e-b52b-745d0bfc6000.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/df07e42d-1f65-4b1e-b52b-745d0bfc6000/df07e42d-1f65-4b1e-b52b-745d0bfc6000.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/df07e42d-1f65-4b1e-b52b-745d0bfc6000/df07e42d-1f65-4b1e-b52b-745d0bfc6000.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In the defamation case Virginia Giuffre brought against Ghislaine Maxwell beginning in 2015, Maxwell responded with a motion for summary judgment—arguing that Giuffre’s allegations were not legally defamatory and that Maxwell was entitled to judgment...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In the defamation case Virginia Giuffre brought against Ghislaine Maxwell beginning in 2015, Maxwell responded with a motion for summary judgment—arguing that Giuffre’s allegations were not legally defamatory and that Maxwell was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. That motion aimed to avoid a trial by asserting that even if all of Giuffre’s allegations were true, they did not meet the legal threshold for defamation. The motion, along with supporting documents, was filed under seal during pre-trial proceedings. Ultimately, the district court did not grant the motion, and the case was later settled out of court under confidentiality terms in 2017.<br /><br /><br />When third parties later moved to unseal portions of the sealed record, particularly filings related to the summary judgment motion, the courts determined that these materials were judicial documents subject to a strong presumption of public access. A federal appeals court ordered their partial release because Maxwell had not shown sufficient reasons to overcome the public’s right of access. In other words, although Maxwell sought to dispose of the case quietly and legally via summary judgment—and shield that process from public view—those efforts were rejected, and important portions of the case were ultimately made part of the public record.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6250471-Epstein-Docs" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein Docs - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>871</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Ghislaine Maxwell Seeks A Summary Judgement Against Virginia Roberts (Part 2)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/ghislaine-maxwell-seeks-a-summary-judgement-against-virginia-roberts-part-2--72419597</link><description><![CDATA[In the defamation case Virginia Giuffre brought against Ghislaine Maxwell beginning in 2015, Maxwell responded with a motion for summary judgment—arguing that Giuffre’s allegations were not legally defamatory and that Maxwell was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. That motion aimed to avoid a trial by asserting that even if all of Giuffre’s allegations were true, they did not meet the legal threshold for defamation. The motion, along with supporting documents, was filed under seal during pre-trial proceedings. Ultimately, the district court did not grant the motion, and the case was later settled out of court under confidentiality terms in 2017.<br /><br /><br />When third parties later moved to unseal portions of the sealed record, particularly filings related to the summary judgment motion, the courts determined that these materials were judicial documents subject to a strong presumption of public access. A federal appeals court ordered their partial release because Maxwell had not shown sufficient reasons to overcome the public’s right of access. In other words, although Maxwell sought to dispose of the case quietly and legally via summary judgment—and shield that process from public view—those efforts were rejected, and important portions of the case were ultimately made part of the public record.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6250471-Epstein-Docs" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein Docs - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72419597</guid><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72419597/memosupmaxjudge2.mp3" length="12195675" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a3bb78f3-4196-4669-9245-0f212e740f67/a3bb78f3-4196-4669-9245-0f212e740f67.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a3bb78f3-4196-4669-9245-0f212e740f67/a3bb78f3-4196-4669-9245-0f212e740f67.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a3bb78f3-4196-4669-9245-0f212e740f67/a3bb78f3-4196-4669-9245-0f212e740f67.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In the defamation case Virginia Giuffre brought against Ghislaine Maxwell beginning in 2015, Maxwell responded with a motion for summary judgment—arguing that Giuffre’s allegations were not legally defamatory and that Maxwell was entitled to judgment...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In the defamation case Virginia Giuffre brought against Ghislaine Maxwell beginning in 2015, Maxwell responded with a motion for summary judgment—arguing that Giuffre’s allegations were not legally defamatory and that Maxwell was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. That motion aimed to avoid a trial by asserting that even if all of Giuffre’s allegations were true, they did not meet the legal threshold for defamation. The motion, along with supporting documents, was filed under seal during pre-trial proceedings. Ultimately, the district court did not grant the motion, and the case was later settled out of court under confidentiality terms in 2017.<br /><br /><br />When third parties later moved to unseal portions of the sealed record, particularly filings related to the summary judgment motion, the courts determined that these materials were judicial documents subject to a strong presumption of public access. A federal appeals court ordered their partial release because Maxwell had not shown sufficient reasons to overcome the public’s right of access. In other words, although Maxwell sought to dispose of the case quietly and legally via summary judgment—and shield that process from public view—those efforts were rejected, and important portions of the case were ultimately made part of the public record.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6250471-Epstein-Docs" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein Docs - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>763</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Ghislaine Maxwell Seeks A Summary Judgement Against Virginia Roberts (Part 1)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/ghislaine-maxwell-seeks-a-summary-judgement-against-virginia-roberts-part-1--72419598</link><description><![CDATA[In the defamation case Virginia Giuffre brought against Ghislaine Maxwell beginning in 2015, Maxwell responded with a motion for summary judgment—arguing that Giuffre’s allegations were not legally defamatory and that Maxwell was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. That motion aimed to avoid a trial by asserting that even if all of Giuffre’s allegations were true, they did not meet the legal threshold for defamation. The motion, along with supporting documents, was filed under seal during pre-trial proceedings. Ultimately, the district court did not grant the motion, and the case was later settled out of court under confidentiality terms in 2017.<br /><br /><br />When third parties later moved to unseal portions of the sealed record, particularly filings related to the summary judgment motion, the courts determined that these materials were judicial documents subject to a strong presumption of public access. A federal appeals court ordered their partial release because Maxwell had not shown sufficient reasons to overcome the public’s right of access. In other words, although Maxwell sought to dispose of the case quietly and legally via summary judgment—and shield that process from public view—those efforts were rejected, and important portions of the case were ultimately made part of the public record.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6250471-Epstein-Docs" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein Docs - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72419598</guid><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 22:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72419598/memosupmaxjudge.mp3" length="11523178" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/64f0e071-391c-4c48-a835-10c958b7b784/64f0e071-391c-4c48-a835-10c958b7b784.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/64f0e071-391c-4c48-a835-10c958b7b784/64f0e071-391c-4c48-a835-10c958b7b784.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/64f0e071-391c-4c48-a835-10c958b7b784/64f0e071-391c-4c48-a835-10c958b7b784.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In the defamation case Virginia Giuffre brought against Ghislaine Maxwell beginning in 2015, Maxwell responded with a motion for summary judgment—arguing that Giuffre’s allegations were not legally defamatory and that Maxwell was entitled to judgment...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In the defamation case Virginia Giuffre brought against Ghislaine Maxwell beginning in 2015, Maxwell responded with a motion for summary judgment—arguing that Giuffre’s allegations were not legally defamatory and that Maxwell was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. That motion aimed to avoid a trial by asserting that even if all of Giuffre’s allegations were true, they did not meet the legal threshold for defamation. The motion, along with supporting documents, was filed under seal during pre-trial proceedings. Ultimately, the district court did not grant the motion, and the case was later settled out of court under confidentiality terms in 2017.<br /><br /><br />When third parties later moved to unseal portions of the sealed record, particularly filings related to the summary judgment motion, the courts determined that these materials were judicial documents subject to a strong presumption of public access. A federal appeals court ordered their partial release because Maxwell had not shown sufficient reasons to overcome the public’s right of access. In other words, although Maxwell sought to dispose of the case quietly and legally via summary judgment—and shield that process from public view—those efforts were rejected, and important portions of the case were ultimately made part of the public record.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6250471-Epstein-Docs" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein Docs - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>721</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Last Channel Before Dawn:  Don't Tell Them That I'm Here (6/8/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-last-channel-before-dawn-don-t-tell-them-that-i-m-here-6-8-26--72419450</link><description><![CDATA[In the premiere episode of Last Channel Before Dawn, we enter the ruined life of Evan, a man who has spent ten years trapped inside the aftermath of a disappearance no one could explain and everyone thought they understood. One ordinary autumn hike in the Bitterroot foothills became the dividing line between the life he had and the life he was forced to endure, after Mara Ellison vanished from a trail while he was only yards away. With no body, no answers, and no evidence strong enough to clear or condemn him, Evan became something worse than a suspect in the eyes of the public: he became a story people could reshape, consume, and weaponize.<br /><br />As the years passed, grief curdled into accusation, silence became punishment, and every anniversary dragged Evan back through the same nightmare of questions, theories, and strangers hungry for certainty. But on the tenth anniversary of Mara’s disappearance, as rain falls and the old wounds reopen, something impossible arrives at Evan’s door. What follows is not peace, not closure, and not the answer anyone expected. It is the beginning of a deeper mystery, one that suggests the truth behind Mara Ellison’s disappearance may be far darker than the lie the world chose to believe.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72419450</guid><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 20:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72419450/dontletthemknowthatimhere.mp3" length="22029418" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e7c7ceff-55ad-4d9b-9e83-bfd6b2ee925b/e7c7ceff-55ad-4d9b-9e83-bfd6b2ee925b.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e7c7ceff-55ad-4d9b-9e83-bfd6b2ee925b/e7c7ceff-55ad-4d9b-9e83-bfd6b2ee925b.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e7c7ceff-55ad-4d9b-9e83-bfd6b2ee925b/e7c7ceff-55ad-4d9b-9e83-bfd6b2ee925b.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In the premiere episode of Last Channel Before Dawn, we enter the ruined life of Evan, a man who has spent ten years trapped inside the aftermath of a disappearance no one could explain and everyone thought they understood. One ordinary autumn hike in...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In the premiere episode of Last Channel Before Dawn, we enter the ruined life of Evan, a man who has spent ten years trapped inside the aftermath of a disappearance no one could explain and everyone thought they understood. One ordinary autumn hike in the Bitterroot foothills became the dividing line between the life he had and the life he was forced to endure, after Mara Ellison vanished from a trail while he was only yards away. With no body, no answers, and no evidence strong enough to clear or condemn him, Evan became something worse than a suspect in the eyes of the public: he became a story people could reshape, consume, and weaponize.<br /><br />As the years passed, grief curdled into accusation, silence became punishment, and every anniversary dragged Evan back through the same nightmare of questions, theories, and strangers hungry for certainty. But on the tenth anniversary of Mara’s disappearance, as rain falls and the old wounds reopen, something impossible arrives at Evan’s door. What follows is not peace, not closure, and not the answer anyone expected. It is the beginning of a deeper mystery, one that suggests the truth behind Mara Ellison’s disappearance may be far darker than the lie the world chose to believe.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1377</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Trump’s DFC Chief Ben Black and the Lingering Shadow of Jeffrey Epstein (Part 2) (6/8/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/trump-s-dfc-chief-ben-black-and-the-lingering-shadow-of-jeffrey-epstein-part-2-6-8-26--72408377</link><description><![CDATA[Ben Black, Donald Trump’s appointee to lead the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation, is facing scrutiny after released DOJ Epstein records showed personal and business connections between him, his family, and Jeffrey Epstein. The records reviewed by the Guardian show that Black and family members invested in Environmental Solutions Worldwide in 2011, a company where Epstein held a stake through his Virgin Islands entity, Financial Trust. Ben Black and his brother Joshua became directors of the company that same year, while Epstein’s involvement intersected with Leon Black, Ben’s father and Epstein’s highest-paying known client. The Guardian also reported records suggesting Epstein was scheduled to meet Ben Black, obtained his contact information after a family estate-planning meeting, claimed to have attended Ben Black’s 30th birthday, weighed in on Ben’s $11.5 million townhouse purchase, and appeared in correspondence involving a woman who sought Epstein’s advice about communicating with Ben. Black has not been accused of wrongdoing, and his spokesperson denied that he had any personal or professional relationship with Epstein.<br /><br /><br />The controversy matters because Black now oversees the DFC, a taxpayer-backed overseas investment agency whose lending cap was recently tripled to $205 billion, dramatically increasing the power of the office he runs. Trump appointed Black after Black and Palantir co-founder Joe Lonsdale promoted a more market-driven approach to foreign aid, but the Guardian reported that some DFC staff had already questioned his qualifications before the Epstein records became an internal concern. The broader issue is not just whether Ben Black personally did anything improper; it is that another person placed in a high-level federal role sits inside the sprawling overlap of Epstein, elite finance, inherited power, private investment, and political appointment. The reporting also places Ben Black’s rise against the backdrop of Leon Black’s long financial relationship with Epstein, including the Senate Finance Committee’s finding that Leon Black paid Epstein $170 million for what Black described as legitimate tax and estate-planning services.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapuccI@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/03/ben-black-investment-trump-epstein" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Trump appointee leading $205bn US agency had personal ties to Epstein, emails show | Trump administration | The Guardian</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72408377</guid><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 18:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72408377/benblack2.mp3" length="18146577" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/48ac69d4-5e5a-4a3d-b0cd-c8bcc613dee4/48ac69d4-5e5a-4a3d-b0cd-c8bcc613dee4.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/48ac69d4-5e5a-4a3d-b0cd-c8bcc613dee4/48ac69d4-5e5a-4a3d-b0cd-c8bcc613dee4.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/48ac69d4-5e5a-4a3d-b0cd-c8bcc613dee4/48ac69d4-5e5a-4a3d-b0cd-c8bcc613dee4.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Ben Black, Donald Trump’s appointee to lead the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation, is facing scrutiny after released DOJ Epstein records showed personal and business connections between him, his family, and Jeffrey Epstein. The...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Ben Black, Donald Trump’s appointee to lead the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation, is facing scrutiny after released DOJ Epstein records showed personal and business connections between him, his family, and Jeffrey Epstein. The records reviewed by the Guardian show that Black and family members invested in Environmental Solutions Worldwide in 2011, a company where Epstein held a stake through his Virgin Islands entity, Financial Trust. Ben Black and his brother Joshua became directors of the company that same year, while Epstein’s involvement intersected with Leon Black, Ben’s father and Epstein’s highest-paying known client. The Guardian also reported records suggesting Epstein was scheduled to meet Ben Black, obtained his contact information after a family estate-planning meeting, claimed to have attended Ben Black’s 30th birthday, weighed in on Ben’s $11.5 million townhouse purchase, and appeared in correspondence involving a woman who sought Epstein’s advice about communicating with Ben. Black has not been accused of wrongdoing, and his spokesperson denied that he had any personal or professional relationship with Epstein.<br /><br /><br />The controversy matters because Black now oversees the DFC, a taxpayer-backed overseas investment agency whose lending cap was recently tripled to $205 billion, dramatically increasing the power of the office he runs. Trump appointed Black after Black and Palantir co-founder Joe Lonsdale promoted a more market-driven approach to foreign aid, but the Guardian reported that some DFC staff had already questioned his qualifications before the Epstein records became an internal concern. The broader issue is not just whether Ben Black personally did anything improper; it is that another person placed in a high-level federal role sits inside the sprawling overlap of Epstein, elite finance, inherited power, private investment, and political appointment. The reporting also places Ben Black’s rise against the backdrop of Leon Black’s long financial relationship with Epstein, including the Senate Finance Committee’s finding that Leon Black paid Epstein $170 million for what Black described as legitimate tax and estate-planning services.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapuccI@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/03/ben-black-investment-trump-epstein" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Trump appointee leading $205bn US agency had personal ties to Epstein, emails show | Trump administration | The Guardian</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1135</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Trump’s DFC Chief Ben Black and the Lingering Shadow of Jeffrey Epstein (Part 1) (6/8/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/trump-s-dfc-chief-ben-black-and-the-lingering-shadow-of-jeffrey-epstein-part-1-6-8-26--72408378</link><description><![CDATA[Ben Black, Donald Trump’s appointee to lead the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation, is facing scrutiny after released DOJ Epstein records showed personal and business connections between him, his family, and Jeffrey Epstein. The records reviewed by the Guardian show that Black and family members invested in Environmental Solutions Worldwide in 2011, a company where Epstein held a stake through his Virgin Islands entity, Financial Trust. Ben Black and his brother Joshua became directors of the company that same year, while Epstein’s involvement intersected with Leon Black, Ben’s father and Epstein’s highest-paying known client. The Guardian also reported records suggesting Epstein was scheduled to meet Ben Black, obtained his contact information after a family estate-planning meeting, claimed to have attended Ben Black’s 30th birthday, weighed in on Ben’s $11.5 million townhouse purchase, and appeared in correspondence involving a woman who sought Epstein’s advice about communicating with Ben. Black has not been accused of wrongdoing, and his spokesperson denied that he had any personal or professional relationship with Epstein.<br /><br /><br />The controversy matters because Black now oversees the DFC, a taxpayer-backed overseas investment agency whose lending cap was recently tripled to $205 billion, dramatically increasing the power of the office he runs. Trump appointed Black after Black and Palantir co-founder Joe Lonsdale promoted a more market-driven approach to foreign aid, but the Guardian reported that some DFC staff had already questioned his qualifications before the Epstein records became an internal concern. The broader issue is not just whether Ben Black personally did anything improper; it is that another person placed in a high-level federal role sits inside the sprawling overlap of Epstein, elite finance, inherited power, private investment, and political appointment. The reporting also places Ben Black’s rise against the backdrop of Leon Black’s long financial relationship with Epstein, including the Senate Finance Committee’s finding that Leon Black paid Epstein $170 million for what Black described as legitimate tax and estate-planning services.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapuccI@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/03/ben-black-investment-trump-epstein" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Trump appointee leading $205bn US agency had personal ties to Epstein, emails show | Trump administration | The Guardian</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72408378</guid><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72408378/benblack1.mp3" length="13457911" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7bb02fa1-dc58-4203-a10a-b059a0b7fd98/7bb02fa1-dc58-4203-a10a-b059a0b7fd98.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7bb02fa1-dc58-4203-a10a-b059a0b7fd98/7bb02fa1-dc58-4203-a10a-b059a0b7fd98.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7bb02fa1-dc58-4203-a10a-b059a0b7fd98/7bb02fa1-dc58-4203-a10a-b059a0b7fd98.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Ben Black, Donald Trump’s appointee to lead the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation, is facing scrutiny after released DOJ Epstein records showed personal and business connections between him, his family, and Jeffrey Epstein. The...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Ben Black, Donald Trump’s appointee to lead the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation, is facing scrutiny after released DOJ Epstein records showed personal and business connections between him, his family, and Jeffrey Epstein. The records reviewed by the Guardian show that Black and family members invested in Environmental Solutions Worldwide in 2011, a company where Epstein held a stake through his Virgin Islands entity, Financial Trust. Ben Black and his brother Joshua became directors of the company that same year, while Epstein’s involvement intersected with Leon Black, Ben’s father and Epstein’s highest-paying known client. The Guardian also reported records suggesting Epstein was scheduled to meet Ben Black, obtained his contact information after a family estate-planning meeting, claimed to have attended Ben Black’s 30th birthday, weighed in on Ben’s $11.5 million townhouse purchase, and appeared in correspondence involving a woman who sought Epstein’s advice about communicating with Ben. Black has not been accused of wrongdoing, and his spokesperson denied that he had any personal or professional relationship with Epstein.<br /><br /><br />The controversy matters because Black now oversees the DFC, a taxpayer-backed overseas investment agency whose lending cap was recently tripled to $205 billion, dramatically increasing the power of the office he runs. Trump appointed Black after Black and Palantir co-founder Joe Lonsdale promoted a more market-driven approach to foreign aid, but the Guardian reported that some DFC staff had already questioned his qualifications before the Epstein records became an internal concern. The broader issue is not just whether Ben Black personally did anything improper; it is that another person placed in a high-level federal role sits inside the sprawling overlap of Epstein, elite finance, inherited power, private investment, and political appointment. The reporting also places Ben Black’s rise against the backdrop of Leon Black’s long financial relationship with Epstein, including the Senate Finance Committee’s finding that Leon Black paid Epstein $170 million for what Black described as legitimate tax and estate-planning services.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapuccI@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/03/ben-black-investment-trump-epstein" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Trump appointee leading $205bn US agency had personal ties to Epstein, emails show | Trump administration | The Guardian</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>842</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Pam Bondi Congressional Oversight Committee Epstein Related Transcript (Part 7) (6/8/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-pam-bondi-congressional-oversight-committee-epstein-related-transcript-part-7-6-8-26--72408379</link><description><![CDATA[Pam Bondi’s congressional transcript showed her trying to defend the Justice Department’s handling of the Epstein files while repeatedly distancing herself from the day-to-day mechanics of the review. She told House Oversight lawmakers that Todd Blanche was the official “in charge” of the Epstein records process, saying she did not personally conduct the document review and that the work had been delegated to him. Bondi acknowledged that mistakes were made, including redaction problems, but framed the release as a massive and difficult undertaking rather than a deliberate attempt to obstruct transparency. At the same time, she insisted the department was committed to accountability, even as lawmakers pressed her on why the disclosures remained incomplete, flawed, or slow-moving.<br /><br />The transcript also showed Bondi trying to avoid directly blaming Blanche while making clear that he was the person managing the release. She praised him as ethical and capable, but Democrats seized on her answers as evidence that Blanche, along with other DOJ and FBI officials, should be brought before Congress to explain the process in detail. Bondi also said she learned about Ghislaine Maxwell’s prison transfer from news reports, denied involvement in that decision, rejected the idea of a Maxwell pardon, and refused to discuss private conversations with Donald Trump. The result was a transcript that did not settle the Epstein files controversy, but instead widened the accountability fight by making clear that Congress still does not have a clean answer on who controlled the review, why errors happened, and whether the public has truly received the full record.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Final-Bondi-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Final-Bondi-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72408379</guid><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 14:49:41 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72408379/bonditranscripts7.mp3" length="15221281" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/80047fe3-501a-4b22-8d96-90028be54e8a/80047fe3-501a-4b22-8d96-90028be54e8a.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/80047fe3-501a-4b22-8d96-90028be54e8a/80047fe3-501a-4b22-8d96-90028be54e8a.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/80047fe3-501a-4b22-8d96-90028be54e8a/80047fe3-501a-4b22-8d96-90028be54e8a.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Pam Bondi’s congressional transcript showed her trying to defend the Justice Department’s handling of the Epstein files while repeatedly distancing herself from the day-to-day mechanics of the review. She told House Oversight lawmakers that Todd...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Pam Bondi’s congressional transcript showed her trying to defend the Justice Department’s handling of the Epstein files while repeatedly distancing herself from the day-to-day mechanics of the review. She told House Oversight lawmakers that Todd Blanche was the official “in charge” of the Epstein records process, saying she did not personally conduct the document review and that the work had been delegated to him. Bondi acknowledged that mistakes were made, including redaction problems, but framed the release as a massive and difficult undertaking rather than a deliberate attempt to obstruct transparency. At the same time, she insisted the department was committed to accountability, even as lawmakers pressed her on why the disclosures remained incomplete, flawed, or slow-moving.<br /><br />The transcript also showed Bondi trying to avoid directly blaming Blanche while making clear that he was the person managing the release. She praised him as ethical and capable, but Democrats seized on her answers as evidence that Blanche, along with other DOJ and FBI officials, should be brought before Congress to explain the process in detail. Bondi also said she learned about Ghislaine Maxwell’s prison transfer from news reports, denied involvement in that decision, rejected the idea of a Maxwell pardon, and refused to discuss private conversations with Donald Trump. The result was a transcript that did not settle the Epstein files controversy, but instead widened the accountability fight by making clear that Congress still does not have a clean answer on who controlled the review, why errors happened, and whether the public has truly received the full record.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Final-Bondi-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Final-Bondi-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>952</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Pam Bondi Congressional Oversight Committee Epstein Related Transcript (Part 6) (6/8/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-pam-bondi-congressional-oversight-committee-epstein-related-transcript-part-6-6-8-26--72408380</link><description><![CDATA[Pam Bondi’s congressional transcript showed her trying to defend the Justice Department’s handling of the Epstein files while repeatedly distancing herself from the day-to-day mechanics of the review. She told House Oversight lawmakers that Todd Blanche was the official “in charge” of the Epstein records process, saying she did not personally conduct the document review and that the work had been delegated to him. Bondi acknowledged that mistakes were made, including redaction problems, but framed the release as a massive and difficult undertaking rather than a deliberate attempt to obstruct transparency. At the same time, she insisted the department was committed to accountability, even as lawmakers pressed her on why the disclosures remained incomplete, flawed, or slow-moving.<br /><br />The transcript also showed Bondi trying to avoid directly blaming Blanche while making clear that he was the person managing the release. She praised him as ethical and capable, but Democrats seized on her answers as evidence that Blanche, along with other DOJ and FBI officials, should be brought before Congress to explain the process in detail. Bondi also said she learned about Ghislaine Maxwell’s prison transfer from news reports, denied involvement in that decision, rejected the idea of a Maxwell pardon, and refused to discuss private conversations with Donald Trump. The result was a transcript that did not settle the Epstein files controversy, but instead widened the accountability fight by making clear that Congress still does not have a clean answer on who controlled the review, why errors happened, and whether the public has truly received the full record.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Final-Bondi-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Final-Bondi-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72408380</guid><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 12:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72408380/bonditranscripts6.mp3" length="12764935" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d0e2ea78-94dd-41c3-b5ec-32687b0669b4/d0e2ea78-94dd-41c3-b5ec-32687b0669b4.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d0e2ea78-94dd-41c3-b5ec-32687b0669b4/d0e2ea78-94dd-41c3-b5ec-32687b0669b4.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d0e2ea78-94dd-41c3-b5ec-32687b0669b4/d0e2ea78-94dd-41c3-b5ec-32687b0669b4.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Pam Bondi’s congressional transcript showed her trying to defend the Justice Department’s handling of the Epstein files while repeatedly distancing herself from the day-to-day mechanics of the review. She told House Oversight lawmakers that Todd...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Pam Bondi’s congressional transcript showed her trying to defend the Justice Department’s handling of the Epstein files while repeatedly distancing herself from the day-to-day mechanics of the review. She told House Oversight lawmakers that Todd Blanche was the official “in charge” of the Epstein records process, saying she did not personally conduct the document review and that the work had been delegated to him. Bondi acknowledged that mistakes were made, including redaction problems, but framed the release as a massive and difficult undertaking rather than a deliberate attempt to obstruct transparency. At the same time, she insisted the department was committed to accountability, even as lawmakers pressed her on why the disclosures remained incomplete, flawed, or slow-moving.<br /><br />The transcript also showed Bondi trying to avoid directly blaming Blanche while making clear that he was the person managing the release. She praised him as ethical and capable, but Democrats seized on her answers as evidence that Blanche, along with other DOJ and FBI officials, should be brought before Congress to explain the process in detail. Bondi also said she learned about Ghislaine Maxwell’s prison transfer from news reports, denied involvement in that decision, rejected the idea of a Maxwell pardon, and refused to discuss private conversations with Donald Trump. The result was a transcript that did not settle the Epstein files controversy, but instead widened the accountability fight by making clear that Congress still does not have a clean answer on who controlled the review, why errors happened, and whether the public has truly received the full record.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Final-Bondi-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Final-Bondi-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>798</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Transcripts From The DOJ's Sit Down With Ghislaine Maxwell (Part 7-9) (6/8/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-transcripts-from-the-doj-s-sit-down-with-ghislaine-maxwell-part-7-9-6-8-26--72402340</link><description><![CDATA[On August 22, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice released redacted transcripts and audio recordings of a two-day interview it conducted in July with Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year federal prison sentence for her role in Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking ring. During the interview, Maxwell denied ever seeing any inappropriate behavior by former President Donald Trump, describing him as a “gentleman in all respects,” and insisted she “never witnessed the president in any inappropriate setting in any way.” She also rejected the existence of a so-called “client list,” countering years of speculation, and claimed to have no knowledge of blackmail or illicit recordings tied to Epstein.<br /><br />In addition to defending high-profile figures, Maxwell expressed doubt that Epstein’s death was a suicide, while also rejecting the notion of an elaborate conspiracy or murder plot. The release of the transcripts—handled under the Trump-era Justice Department—has stirred sharp political debate. Trump allies have framed her remarks as vindication, while critics and Epstein’s survivors question her credibility, pointing to her conviction and suggesting her words may be aimed at influencing potential clemency or political favor.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/storage/audio-files/Interview%20Transcript/Interview%20Transcript%20-%20Maxwell%202025.07.24%20(Redacted).pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Interview Transcript - Maxwell 2025.07.24 (Redacted).pdf</a>-<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72402340</guid><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72402340/megamaxtranscripts7n8n9.mp3" length="38899505" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3072b90b-9ce1-4843-baa7-d0a40fea9ebd/3072b90b-9ce1-4843-baa7-d0a40fea9ebd.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3072b90b-9ce1-4843-baa7-d0a40fea9ebd/3072b90b-9ce1-4843-baa7-d0a40fea9ebd.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3072b90b-9ce1-4843-baa7-d0a40fea9ebd/3072b90b-9ce1-4843-baa7-d0a40fea9ebd.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On August 22, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice released redacted transcripts and audio recordings of a two-day interview it conducted in July with Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year federal prison sentence for her role in Jeffrey...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On August 22, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice released redacted transcripts and audio recordings of a two-day interview it conducted in July with Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year federal prison sentence for her role in Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking ring. During the interview, Maxwell denied ever seeing any inappropriate behavior by former President Donald Trump, describing him as a “gentleman in all respects,” and insisted she “never witnessed the president in any inappropriate setting in any way.” She also rejected the existence of a so-called “client list,” countering years of speculation, and claimed to have no knowledge of blackmail or illicit recordings tied to Epstein.<br /><br />In addition to defending high-profile figures, Maxwell expressed doubt that Epstein’s death was a suicide, while also rejecting the notion of an elaborate conspiracy or murder plot. The release of the transcripts—handled under the Trump-era Justice Department—has stirred sharp political debate. Trump allies have framed her remarks as vindication, while critics and Epstein’s survivors question her credibility, pointing to her conviction and suggesting her words may be aimed at influencing potential clemency or political favor.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/storage/audio-files/Interview%20Transcript/Interview%20Transcript%20-%20Maxwell%202025.07.24%20(Redacted).pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Interview Transcript - Maxwell 2025.07.24 (Redacted).pdf</a>-<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2432</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Transcripts From The DOJ's Sit Down With Ghislaine Maxwell (Part 4-6) (6/7/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-transcripts-from-the-doj-s-sit-down-with-ghislaine-maxwell-part-4-6-6-7-26--72402341</link><description><![CDATA[On August 22, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice released redacted transcripts and audio recordings of a two-day interview it conducted in July with Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year federal prison sentence for her role in Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking ring. During the interview, Maxwell denied ever seeing any inappropriate behavior by former President Donald Trump, describing him as a “gentleman in all respects,” and insisted she “never witnessed the president in any inappropriate setting in any way.” She also rejected the existence of a so-called “client list,” countering years of speculation, and claimed to have no knowledge of blackmail or illicit recordings tied to Epstein.<br /><br />In addition to defending high-profile figures, Maxwell expressed doubt that Epstein’s death was a suicide, while also rejecting the notion of an elaborate conspiracy or murder plot. The release of the transcripts—handled under the Trump-era Justice Department—has stirred sharp political debate. Trump allies have framed her remarks as vindication, while critics and Epstein’s survivors question her credibility, pointing to her conviction and suggesting her words may be aimed at influencing potential clemency or political favor.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/storage/audio-files/Interview%20Transcript/Interview%20Transcript%20-%20Maxwell%202025.07.24%20(Redacted).pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Interview Transcript - Maxwell 2025.07.24 (Redacted).pdf</a>-<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72402341</guid><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 08:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72402341/megamaxtranscripts4n6n6.mp3" length="44736305" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6126d722-1cd7-4dba-937d-b79b008727ad/6126d722-1cd7-4dba-937d-b79b008727ad.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6126d722-1cd7-4dba-937d-b79b008727ad/6126d722-1cd7-4dba-937d-b79b008727ad.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6126d722-1cd7-4dba-937d-b79b008727ad/6126d722-1cd7-4dba-937d-b79b008727ad.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On August 22, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice released redacted transcripts and audio recordings of a two-day interview it conducted in July with Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year federal prison sentence for her role in Jeffrey...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On August 22, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice released redacted transcripts and audio recordings of a two-day interview it conducted in July with Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year federal prison sentence for her role in Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking ring. During the interview, Maxwell denied ever seeing any inappropriate behavior by former President Donald Trump, describing him as a “gentleman in all respects,” and insisted she “never witnessed the president in any inappropriate setting in any way.” She also rejected the existence of a so-called “client list,” countering years of speculation, and claimed to have no knowledge of blackmail or illicit recordings tied to Epstein.<br /><br />In addition to defending high-profile figures, Maxwell expressed doubt that Epstein’s death was a suicide, while also rejecting the notion of an elaborate conspiracy or murder plot. The release of the transcripts—handled under the Trump-era Justice Department—has stirred sharp political debate. Trump allies have framed her remarks as vindication, while critics and Epstein’s survivors question her credibility, pointing to her conviction and suggesting her words may be aimed at influencing potential clemency or political favor.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/storage/audio-files/Interview%20Transcript/Interview%20Transcript%20-%20Maxwell%202025.07.24%20(Redacted).pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Interview Transcript - Maxwell 2025.07.24 (Redacted).pdf</a>-<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2796</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Transcripts From The DOJ's Sit Down With Ghislaine Maxwell (Part 1-3) (6/7/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-transcripts-from-the-doj-s-sit-down-with-ghislaine-maxwell-part-1-3-6-7-26--72402339</link><description><![CDATA[On August 22, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice released redacted transcripts and audio recordings of a two-day interview it conducted in July with Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year federal prison sentence for her role in Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking ring. During the interview, Maxwell denied ever seeing any inappropriate behavior by former President Donald Trump, describing him as a “gentleman in all respects,” and insisted she “never witnessed the president in any inappropriate setting in any way.” She also rejected the existence of a so-called “client list,” countering years of speculation, and claimed to have no knowledge of blackmail or illicit recordings tied to Epstein.<br /><br />In addition to defending high-profile figures, Maxwell expressed doubt that Epstein’s death was a suicide, while also rejecting the notion of an elaborate conspiracy or murder plot. The release of the transcripts—handled under the Trump-era Justice Department—has stirred sharp political debate. Trump allies have framed her remarks as vindication, while critics and Epstein’s survivors question her credibility, pointing to her conviction and suggesting her words may be aimed at influencing potential clemency or political favor.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/storage/audio-files/Interview%20Transcript/Interview%20Transcript%20-%20Maxwell%202025.07.24%20(Redacted).pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Interview Transcript - Maxwell 2025.07.24 (Redacted).pdf</a>-<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72402339</guid><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72402339/megamaxtranscripts1n2n3.mp3" length="42590920" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d44e698b-a8be-4ff1-9f18-2585443bf74b/d44e698b-a8be-4ff1-9f18-2585443bf74b.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d44e698b-a8be-4ff1-9f18-2585443bf74b/d44e698b-a8be-4ff1-9f18-2585443bf74b.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d44e698b-a8be-4ff1-9f18-2585443bf74b/d44e698b-a8be-4ff1-9f18-2585443bf74b.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On August 22, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice released redacted transcripts and audio recordings of a two-day interview it conducted in July with Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year federal prison sentence for her role in Jeffrey...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On August 22, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice released redacted transcripts and audio recordings of a two-day interview it conducted in July with Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year federal prison sentence for her role in Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking ring. During the interview, Maxwell denied ever seeing any inappropriate behavior by former President Donald Trump, describing him as a “gentleman in all respects,” and insisted she “never witnessed the president in any inappropriate setting in any way.” She also rejected the existence of a so-called “client list,” countering years of speculation, and claimed to have no knowledge of blackmail or illicit recordings tied to Epstein.<br /><br />In addition to defending high-profile figures, Maxwell expressed doubt that Epstein’s death was a suicide, while also rejecting the notion of an elaborate conspiracy or murder plot. The release of the transcripts—handled under the Trump-era Justice Department—has stirred sharp political debate. Trump allies have framed her remarks as vindication, while critics and Epstein’s survivors question her credibility, pointing to her conviction and suggesting her words may be aimed at influencing potential clemency or political favor.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/storage/audio-files/Interview%20Transcript/Interview%20Transcript%20-%20Maxwell%202025.07.24%20(Redacted).pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Interview Transcript - Maxwell 2025.07.24 (Redacted).pdf</a>-<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2662</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Governor John de Jongh's  Motion To Dismiss The Epstein Survivors Lawsuit (Part 4)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/governor-john-de-jongh-s-motion-to-dismiss-the-epstein-survivors-lawsuit-part-4--72370892</link><description><![CDATA[Former U.S. Virgin Islands Governor John de Jongh Jr. has filed a memorandum in federal court seeking to dismiss, transfer, or strike the lawsuit brought by five anonymous women identified as Jane Does 1-5, who accuse the Virgin Islands government and several current and former officials of enabling Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking network. De Jongh argues that the Southern District of New York lacks jurisdiction, asserting he has been a resident of the U.S. Virgin Islands for decades and has no substantial ties to New York that would justify the case being heard there. He also claims he was improperly served at a Manhattan address where he says he does not reside or maintain control, insisting the lawsuit should be dismissed or moved to the Virgin Islands, where the alleged conduct occurred.<br /><br />The memorandum further contends that even if the court finds jurisdiction proper, the claims against De Jongh should still be thrown out because they are barred by prior settlement releases signed by Epstein’s victims as part of earlier agreements with his estate. He argues that the complaint fails to allege specific wrongful acts committed by him and maintains that any actions connected to Epstein occurred while he was serving in his official capacity, which he says grants him legal immunity. De Jongh also asks the court to strike portions of the complaint as irrelevant and prejudicial, describing them as inflammatory rather than grounded in fact. The filing adds another layer to the expanding legal fight over what government officials knew— and failed to stop—while Epstein operated in the Virgin Islands.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72370892</guid><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 04:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72370892/johdejongmemo4.mp3" length="11747204" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0e22dfba-34e6-4843-bbfe-f697da5a65f1/0e22dfba-34e6-4843-bbfe-f697da5a65f1.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0e22dfba-34e6-4843-bbfe-f697da5a65f1/0e22dfba-34e6-4843-bbfe-f697da5a65f1.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0e22dfba-34e6-4843-bbfe-f697da5a65f1/0e22dfba-34e6-4843-bbfe-f697da5a65f1.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Former U.S. Virgin Islands Governor John de Jongh Jr. has filed a memorandum in federal court seeking to dismiss, transfer, or strike the lawsuit brought by five anonymous women identified as Jane Does 1-5, who accuse the Virgin Islands government and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Former U.S. Virgin Islands Governor John de Jongh Jr. has filed a memorandum in federal court seeking to dismiss, transfer, or strike the lawsuit brought by five anonymous women identified as Jane Does 1-5, who accuse the Virgin Islands government and several current and former officials of enabling Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking network. De Jongh argues that the Southern District of New York lacks jurisdiction, asserting he has been a resident of the U.S. Virgin Islands for decades and has no substantial ties to New York that would justify the case being heard there. He also claims he was improperly served at a Manhattan address where he says he does not reside or maintain control, insisting the lawsuit should be dismissed or moved to the Virgin Islands, where the alleged conduct occurred.<br /><br />The memorandum further contends that even if the court finds jurisdiction proper, the claims against De Jongh should still be thrown out because they are barred by prior settlement releases signed by Epstein’s victims as part of earlier agreements with his estate. He argues that the complaint fails to allege specific wrongful acts committed by him and maintains that any actions connected to Epstein occurred while he was serving in his official capacity, which he says grants him legal immunity. De Jongh also asks the court to strike portions of the complaint as irrelevant and prejudicial, describing them as inflammatory rather than grounded in fact. The filing adds another layer to the expanding legal fight over what government officials knew— and failed to stop—while Epstein operated in the Virgin Islands.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>735</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Governor John de Jongh's  Motion To Dismiss The Epstein Survivors Lawsuit (Part 3)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/governor-john-de-jongh-s-motion-to-dismiss-the-epstein-survivors-lawsuit-part-3--72370893</link><description><![CDATA[Former U.S. Virgin Islands Governor John de Jongh Jr. has filed a memorandum in federal court seeking to dismiss, transfer, or strike the lawsuit brought by five anonymous women identified as Jane Does 1-5, who accuse the Virgin Islands government and several current and former officials of enabling Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking network. De Jongh argues that the Southern District of New York lacks jurisdiction, asserting he has been a resident of the U.S. Virgin Islands for decades and has no substantial ties to New York that would justify the case being heard there. He also claims he was improperly served at a Manhattan address where he says he does not reside or maintain control, insisting the lawsuit should be dismissed or moved to the Virgin Islands, where the alleged conduct occurred.<br /><br />The memorandum further contends that even if the court finds jurisdiction proper, the claims against De Jongh should still be thrown out because they are barred by prior settlement releases signed by Epstein’s victims as part of earlier agreements with his estate. He argues that the complaint fails to allege specific wrongful acts committed by him and maintains that any actions connected to Epstein occurred while he was serving in his official capacity, which he says grants him legal immunity. De Jongh also asks the court to strike portions of the complaint as irrelevant and prejudicial, describing them as inflammatory rather than grounded in fact. The filing adds another layer to the expanding legal fight over what government officials knew— and failed to stop—while Epstein operated in the Virgin Islands.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72370893</guid><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72370893/johdejongmemo3.mp3" length="10711084" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/daf79a4f-cad5-4011-88b5-300bf5976b75/daf79a4f-cad5-4011-88b5-300bf5976b75.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/daf79a4f-cad5-4011-88b5-300bf5976b75/daf79a4f-cad5-4011-88b5-300bf5976b75.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/daf79a4f-cad5-4011-88b5-300bf5976b75/daf79a4f-cad5-4011-88b5-300bf5976b75.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Former U.S. Virgin Islands Governor John de Jongh Jr. has filed a memorandum in federal court seeking to dismiss, transfer, or strike the lawsuit brought by five anonymous women identified as Jane Does 1-5, who accuse the Virgin Islands government and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Former U.S. Virgin Islands Governor John de Jongh Jr. has filed a memorandum in federal court seeking to dismiss, transfer, or strike the lawsuit brought by five anonymous women identified as Jane Does 1-5, who accuse the Virgin Islands government and several current and former officials of enabling Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking network. De Jongh argues that the Southern District of New York lacks jurisdiction, asserting he has been a resident of the U.S. Virgin Islands for decades and has no substantial ties to New York that would justify the case being heard there. He also claims he was improperly served at a Manhattan address where he says he does not reside or maintain control, insisting the lawsuit should be dismissed or moved to the Virgin Islands, where the alleged conduct occurred.<br /><br />The memorandum further contends that even if the court finds jurisdiction proper, the claims against De Jongh should still be thrown out because they are barred by prior settlement releases signed by Epstein’s victims as part of earlier agreements with his estate. He argues that the complaint fails to allege specific wrongful acts committed by him and maintains that any actions connected to Epstein occurred while he was serving in his official capacity, which he says grants him legal immunity. De Jongh also asks the court to strike portions of the complaint as irrelevant and prejudicial, describing them as inflammatory rather than grounded in fact. The filing adds another layer to the expanding legal fight over what government officials knew— and failed to stop—while Epstein operated in the Virgin Islands.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>670</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Governor John de Jongh's  Motion To Dismiss The Epstein Survivors Lawsuit (Part 2)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/governor-john-de-jongh-s-motion-to-dismiss-the-epstein-survivors-lawsuit-part-2--72370894</link><description><![CDATA[Former U.S. Virgin Islands Governor John de Jongh Jr. has filed a memorandum in federal court seeking to dismiss, transfer, or strike the lawsuit brought by five anonymous women identified as Jane Does 1-5, who accuse the Virgin Islands government and several current and former officials of enabling Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking network. De Jongh argues that the Southern District of New York lacks jurisdiction, asserting he has been a resident of the U.S. Virgin Islands for decades and has no substantial ties to New York that would justify the case being heard there. He also claims he was improperly served at a Manhattan address where he says he does not reside or maintain control, insisting the lawsuit should be dismissed or moved to the Virgin Islands, where the alleged conduct occurred.<br /><br />The memorandum further contends that even if the court finds jurisdiction proper, the claims against De Jongh should still be thrown out because they are barred by prior settlement releases signed by Epstein’s victims as part of earlier agreements with his estate. He argues that the complaint fails to allege specific wrongful acts committed by him and maintains that any actions connected to Epstein occurred while he was serving in his official capacity, which he says grants him legal immunity. De Jongh also asks the court to strike portions of the complaint as irrelevant and prejudicial, describing them as inflammatory rather than grounded in fact. The filing adds another layer to the expanding legal fight over what government officials knew— and failed to stop—while Epstein operated in the Virgin Islands.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72370894</guid><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72370894/johdejongmemo2.mp3" length="11254013" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0a263ddd-f887-4200-8929-8801cfa1dc8f/0a263ddd-f887-4200-8929-8801cfa1dc8f.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0a263ddd-f887-4200-8929-8801cfa1dc8f/0a263ddd-f887-4200-8929-8801cfa1dc8f.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0a263ddd-f887-4200-8929-8801cfa1dc8f/0a263ddd-f887-4200-8929-8801cfa1dc8f.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Former U.S. Virgin Islands Governor John de Jongh Jr. has filed a memorandum in federal court seeking to dismiss, transfer, or strike the lawsuit brought by five anonymous women identified as Jane Does 1-5, who accuse the Virgin Islands government and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Former U.S. Virgin Islands Governor John de Jongh Jr. has filed a memorandum in federal court seeking to dismiss, transfer, or strike the lawsuit brought by five anonymous women identified as Jane Does 1-5, who accuse the Virgin Islands government and several current and former officials of enabling Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking network. De Jongh argues that the Southern District of New York lacks jurisdiction, asserting he has been a resident of the U.S. Virgin Islands for decades and has no substantial ties to New York that would justify the case being heard there. He also claims he was improperly served at a Manhattan address where he says he does not reside or maintain control, insisting the lawsuit should be dismissed or moved to the Virgin Islands, where the alleged conduct occurred.<br /><br />The memorandum further contends that even if the court finds jurisdiction proper, the claims against De Jongh should still be thrown out because they are barred by prior settlement releases signed by Epstein’s victims as part of earlier agreements with his estate. He argues that the complaint fails to allege specific wrongful acts committed by him and maintains that any actions connected to Epstein occurred while he was serving in his official capacity, which he says grants him legal immunity. De Jongh also asks the court to strike portions of the complaint as irrelevant and prejudicial, describing them as inflammatory rather than grounded in fact. The filing adds another layer to the expanding legal fight over what government officials knew— and failed to stop—while Epstein operated in the Virgin Islands.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>704</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Governor John de Jongh's  Motion To Dismiss The Epstein Survivors Lawsuit (Part 1)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/governor-john-de-jongh-s-motion-to-dismiss-the-epstein-survivors-lawsuit-part-1--72370895</link><description><![CDATA[Former U.S. Virgin Islands Governor John de Jongh Jr. has filed a memorandum in federal court seeking to dismiss, transfer, or strike the lawsuit brought by five anonymous women identified as Jane Does 1-5, who accuse the Virgin Islands government and several current and former officials of enabling Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking network. De Jongh argues that the Southern District of New York lacks jurisdiction, asserting he has been a resident of the U.S. Virgin Islands for decades and has no substantial ties to New York that would justify the case being heard there. He also claims he was improperly served at a Manhattan address where he says he does not reside or maintain control, insisting the lawsuit should be dismissed or moved to the Virgin Islands, where the alleged conduct occurred.<br /><br />The memorandum further contends that even if the court finds jurisdiction proper, the claims against De Jongh should still be thrown out because they are barred by prior settlement releases signed by Epstein’s victims as part of earlier agreements with his estate. He argues that the complaint fails to allege specific wrongful acts committed by him and maintains that any actions connected to Epstein occurred while he was serving in his official capacity, which he says grants him legal immunity. De Jongh also asks the court to strike portions of the complaint as irrelevant and prejudicial, describing them as inflammatory rather than grounded in fact. The filing adds another layer to the expanding legal fight over what government officials knew— and failed to stop—while Epstein operated in the Virgin Islands.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72370895</guid><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72370895/johdejongmemo1.mp3" length="10484550" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/46d92ac8-d705-40d3-b19b-1108d217d9fb/46d92ac8-d705-40d3-b19b-1108d217d9fb.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/46d92ac8-d705-40d3-b19b-1108d217d9fb/46d92ac8-d705-40d3-b19b-1108d217d9fb.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/46d92ac8-d705-40d3-b19b-1108d217d9fb/46d92ac8-d705-40d3-b19b-1108d217d9fb.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Former U.S. Virgin Islands Governor John de Jongh Jr. has filed a memorandum in federal court seeking to dismiss, transfer, or strike the lawsuit brought by five anonymous women identified as Jane Does 1-5, who accuse the Virgin Islands government and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Former U.S. Virgin Islands Governor John de Jongh Jr. has filed a memorandum in federal court seeking to dismiss, transfer, or strike the lawsuit brought by five anonymous women identified as Jane Does 1-5, who accuse the Virgin Islands government and several current and former officials of enabling Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking network. De Jongh argues that the Southern District of New York lacks jurisdiction, asserting he has been a resident of the U.S. Virgin Islands for decades and has no substantial ties to New York that would justify the case being heard there. He also claims he was improperly served at a Manhattan address where he says he does not reside or maintain control, insisting the lawsuit should be dismissed or moved to the Virgin Islands, where the alleged conduct occurred.<br /><br />The memorandum further contends that even if the court finds jurisdiction proper, the claims against De Jongh should still be thrown out because they are barred by prior settlement releases signed by Epstein’s victims as part of earlier agreements with his estate. He argues that the complaint fails to allege specific wrongful acts committed by him and maintains that any actions connected to Epstein occurred while he was serving in his official capacity, which he says grants him legal immunity. De Jongh also asks the court to strike portions of the complaint as irrelevant and prejudicial, describing them as inflammatory rather than grounded in fact. The filing adds another layer to the expanding legal fight over what government officials knew— and failed to stop—while Epstein operated in the Virgin Islands.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>656</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Pam Bondi Congressional Oversight Committee Epstein Related Transcript (Part 5) (6/7/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-pam-bondi-congressional-oversight-committee-epstein-related-transcript-part-5-6-7-26--72402336</link><description><![CDATA[Pam Bondi’s congressional transcript showed her trying to defend the Justice Department’s handling of the Epstein files while repeatedly distancing herself from the day-to-day mechanics of the review. She told House Oversight lawmakers that Todd Blanche was the official “in charge” of the Epstein records process, saying she did not personally conduct the document review and that the work had been delegated to him. Bondi acknowledged that mistakes were made, including redaction problems, but framed the release as a massive and difficult undertaking rather than a deliberate attempt to obstruct transparency. At the same time, she insisted the department was committed to accountability, even as lawmakers pressed her on why the disclosures remained incomplete, flawed, or slow-moving.<br /><br />The transcript also showed Bondi trying to avoid directly blaming Blanche while making clear that he was the person managing the release. She praised him as ethical and capable, but Democrats seized on her answers as evidence that Blanche, along with other DOJ and FBI officials, should be brought before Congress to explain the process in detail. Bondi also said she learned about Ghislaine Maxwell’s prison transfer from news reports, denied involvement in that decision, rejected the idea of a Maxwell pardon, and refused to discuss private conversations with Donald Trump. The result was a transcript that did not settle the Epstein files controversy, but instead widened the accountability fight by making clear that Congress still does not have a clean answer on who controlled the review, why errors happened, and whether the public has truly received the full record.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Final-Bondi-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Final-Bondi-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72402336</guid><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 20:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72402336/bonditranscripts5.mp3" length="12198182" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b4871ebf-97ea-441a-b3a1-3d6142125dcf/b4871ebf-97ea-441a-b3a1-3d6142125dcf.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b4871ebf-97ea-441a-b3a1-3d6142125dcf/b4871ebf-97ea-441a-b3a1-3d6142125dcf.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b4871ebf-97ea-441a-b3a1-3d6142125dcf/b4871ebf-97ea-441a-b3a1-3d6142125dcf.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Pam Bondi’s congressional transcript showed her trying to defend the Justice Department’s handling of the Epstein files while repeatedly distancing herself from the day-to-day mechanics of the review. She told House Oversight lawmakers that Todd...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Pam Bondi’s congressional transcript showed her trying to defend the Justice Department’s handling of the Epstein files while repeatedly distancing herself from the day-to-day mechanics of the review. She told House Oversight lawmakers that Todd Blanche was the official “in charge” of the Epstein records process, saying she did not personally conduct the document review and that the work had been delegated to him. Bondi acknowledged that mistakes were made, including redaction problems, but framed the release as a massive and difficult undertaking rather than a deliberate attempt to obstruct transparency. At the same time, she insisted the department was committed to accountability, even as lawmakers pressed her on why the disclosures remained incomplete, flawed, or slow-moving.<br /><br />The transcript also showed Bondi trying to avoid directly blaming Blanche while making clear that he was the person managing the release. She praised him as ethical and capable, but Democrats seized on her answers as evidence that Blanche, along with other DOJ and FBI officials, should be brought before Congress to explain the process in detail. Bondi also said she learned about Ghislaine Maxwell’s prison transfer from news reports, denied involvement in that decision, rejected the idea of a Maxwell pardon, and refused to discuss private conversations with Donald Trump. The result was a transcript that did not settle the Epstein files controversy, but instead widened the accountability fight by making clear that Congress still does not have a clean answer on who controlled the review, why errors happened, and whether the public has truly received the full record.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Final-Bondi-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Final-Bondi-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>763</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Pam Bondi Congressional Oversight Committee Epstein Related Transcript (Part 4) (6/7/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-pam-bondi-congressional-oversight-committee-epstein-related-transcript-part-4-6-7-26--72402337</link><description><![CDATA[Pam Bondi’s congressional transcript showed her trying to defend the Justice Department’s handling of the Epstein files while repeatedly distancing herself from the day-to-day mechanics of the review. She told House Oversight lawmakers that Todd Blanche was the official “in charge” of the Epstein records process, saying she did not personally conduct the document review and that the work had been delegated to him. Bondi acknowledged that mistakes were made, including redaction problems, but framed the release as a massive and difficult undertaking rather than a deliberate attempt to obstruct transparency. At the same time, she insisted the department was committed to accountability, even as lawmakers pressed her on why the disclosures remained incomplete, flawed, or slow-moving.<br /><br />The transcript also showed Bondi trying to avoid directly blaming Blanche while making clear that he was the person managing the release. She praised him as ethical and capable, but Democrats seized on her answers as evidence that Blanche, along with other DOJ and FBI officials, should be brought before Congress to explain the process in detail. Bondi also said she learned about Ghislaine Maxwell’s prison transfer from news reports, denied involvement in that decision, rejected the idea of a Maxwell pardon, and refused to discuss private conversations with Donald Trump. The result was a transcript that did not settle the Epstein files controversy, but instead widened the accountability fight by making clear that Congress still does not have a clean answer on who controlled the review, why errors happened, and whether the public has truly received the full record.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Final-Bondi-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Final-Bondi-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72402337</guid><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 18:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72402337/bonditranscripts4.mp3" length="12307270" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b2bb90ee-a0e7-4704-a34e-bc1025c70d5c/b2bb90ee-a0e7-4704-a34e-bc1025c70d5c.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b2bb90ee-a0e7-4704-a34e-bc1025c70d5c/b2bb90ee-a0e7-4704-a34e-bc1025c70d5c.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b2bb90ee-a0e7-4704-a34e-bc1025c70d5c/b2bb90ee-a0e7-4704-a34e-bc1025c70d5c.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Pam Bondi’s congressional transcript showed her trying to defend the Justice Department’s handling of the Epstein files while repeatedly distancing herself from the day-to-day mechanics of the review. She told House Oversight lawmakers that Todd...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Pam Bondi’s congressional transcript showed her trying to defend the Justice Department’s handling of the Epstein files while repeatedly distancing herself from the day-to-day mechanics of the review. She told House Oversight lawmakers that Todd Blanche was the official “in charge” of the Epstein records process, saying she did not personally conduct the document review and that the work had been delegated to him. Bondi acknowledged that mistakes were made, including redaction problems, but framed the release as a massive and difficult undertaking rather than a deliberate attempt to obstruct transparency. At the same time, she insisted the department was committed to accountability, even as lawmakers pressed her on why the disclosures remained incomplete, flawed, or slow-moving.<br /><br />The transcript also showed Bondi trying to avoid directly blaming Blanche while making clear that he was the person managing the release. She praised him as ethical and capable, but Democrats seized on her answers as evidence that Blanche, along with other DOJ and FBI officials, should be brought before Congress to explain the process in detail. Bondi also said she learned about Ghislaine Maxwell’s prison transfer from news reports, denied involvement in that decision, rejected the idea of a Maxwell pardon, and refused to discuss private conversations with Donald Trump. The result was a transcript that did not settle the Epstein files controversy, but instead widened the accountability fight by making clear that Congress still does not have a clean answer on who controlled the review, why errors happened, and whether the public has truly received the full record.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Final-Bondi-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Final-Bondi-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>770</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Pam Bondi Congressional Oversight Committee Epstein Related Transcript (Part 3) (6/7/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-pam-bondi-congressional-oversight-committee-epstein-related-transcript-part-3-6-7-26--72402335</link><description><![CDATA[Pam Bondi’s congressional transcript showed her trying to defend the Justice Department’s handling of the Epstein files while repeatedly distancing herself from the day-to-day mechanics of the review. She told House Oversight lawmakers that Todd Blanche was the official “in charge” of the Epstein records process, saying she did not personally conduct the document review and that the work had been delegated to him. Bondi acknowledged that mistakes were made, including redaction problems, but framed the release as a massive and difficult undertaking rather than a deliberate attempt to obstruct transparency. At the same time, she insisted the department was committed to accountability, even as lawmakers pressed her on why the disclosures remained incomplete, flawed, or slow-moving.<br /><br />The transcript also showed Bondi trying to avoid directly blaming Blanche while making clear that he was the person managing the release. She praised him as ethical and capable, but Democrats seized on her answers as evidence that Blanche, along with other DOJ and FBI officials, should be brought before Congress to explain the process in detail. Bondi also said she learned about Ghislaine Maxwell’s prison transfer from news reports, denied involvement in that decision, rejected the idea of a Maxwell pardon, and refused to discuss private conversations with Donald Trump. The result was a transcript that did not settle the Epstein files controversy, but instead widened the accountability fight by making clear that Congress still does not have a clean answer on who controlled the review, why errors happened, and whether the public has truly received the full record.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Final-Bondi-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Final-Bondi-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72402335</guid><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72402335/bonditranscripts3.mp3" length="12247502" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/15fb3ae0-6ddf-491e-967a-b1ff82807d65/15fb3ae0-6ddf-491e-967a-b1ff82807d65.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/15fb3ae0-6ddf-491e-967a-b1ff82807d65/15fb3ae0-6ddf-491e-967a-b1ff82807d65.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/15fb3ae0-6ddf-491e-967a-b1ff82807d65/15fb3ae0-6ddf-491e-967a-b1ff82807d65.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Pam Bondi’s congressional transcript showed her trying to defend the Justice Department’s handling of the Epstein files while repeatedly distancing herself from the day-to-day mechanics of the review. She told House Oversight lawmakers that Todd...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Pam Bondi’s congressional transcript showed her trying to defend the Justice Department’s handling of the Epstein files while repeatedly distancing herself from the day-to-day mechanics of the review. She told House Oversight lawmakers that Todd Blanche was the official “in charge” of the Epstein records process, saying she did not personally conduct the document review and that the work had been delegated to him. Bondi acknowledged that mistakes were made, including redaction problems, but framed the release as a massive and difficult undertaking rather than a deliberate attempt to obstruct transparency. At the same time, she insisted the department was committed to accountability, even as lawmakers pressed her on why the disclosures remained incomplete, flawed, or slow-moving.<br /><br />The transcript also showed Bondi trying to avoid directly blaming Blanche while making clear that he was the person managing the release. She praised him as ethical and capable, but Democrats seized on her answers as evidence that Blanche, along with other DOJ and FBI officials, should be brought before Congress to explain the process in detail. Bondi also said she learned about Ghislaine Maxwell’s prison transfer from news reports, denied involvement in that decision, rejected the idea of a Maxwell pardon, and refused to discuss private conversations with Donald Trump. The result was a transcript that did not settle the Epstein files controversy, but instead widened the accountability fight by making clear that Congress still does not have a clean answer on who controlled the review, why errors happened, and whether the public has truly received the full record.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Final-Bondi-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Final-Bondi-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>766</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  MCC Captain's Statement Detailing The Death Of Jeffrey Epstein (Part 14-17) (6/7/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-mcc-captain-s-statement-detailing-the-death-of-jeffrey-epstein-part-14-17-6-7-26--72390392</link><description><![CDATA[This deposition comes from an unnamed captain at the Metropolitan Correctional Center and provides a detailed account of how Jeffrey Epstein was managed inside the facility, particularly in the Special Housing Unit. The captain describes Epstein’s status following his prior suicide incident, including the decision-making process around his housing, monitoring level, and classification. The testimony highlights that Epstein had previously been placed under suicide watch but was later removed from those heightened precautions, despite ongoing concerns about his mental state. It also addresses Epstein’s resistance to having a cellmate and the facility’s shifting responses to that issue, revealing a pattern where known risks were acknowledged but not consistently acted upon.<br /><br />The deposition also exposes broader operational failures within MCC, particularly regarding supervision, communication, and adherence to protocol. The captain’s account suggests that while staff were aware of Epstein’s vulnerability, the systems in place failed to ensure continuous and effective monitoring. Decisions around staffing, inmate placement, and observation procedures appear fragmented, with lapses that ultimately left Epstein in a position that contradicted earlier risk assessments. The testimony reinforces the larger picture of institutional breakdown, where responsibility was diffused across personnel and safeguards that should have been firmly in place were instead inconsistently applied.<br /><br />What makes this account difficult to accept at face value is how neatly it shifts the burden onto procedural gray areas rather than confronting the glaring contradictions in custody decisions. The captain’s testimony acknowledges that Epstein was a known suicide risk, had already experienced a prior incident, and required heightened oversight, yet still attempts to frame the subsequent downgrade in monitoring as routine or justified. That explanation strains credibility when measured against the totality of circumstances, particularly the repeated deviations from established suicide prevention protocols and the failure to enforce basic safeguards like consistent observation and appropriate cell assignments. Instead of clarifying responsibility, the deposition reads more like an exercise in institutional self-preservation—where systemic failures are reframed as isolated judgment calls, and accountability is diluted across layers of bureaucracy. In that context, the official narrative begins to look less like a coherent explanation and more like a patchwork defense designed to explain away decisions that, taken together, point to a breakdown that should never have occurred in a high-security federal facility.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00059973.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00059973.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72390392</guid><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72390392/megacaptainoig14n15n16n17.mp3" length="60096723" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9ef7aca8-e11b-4b14-94c4-9b67913ea946/9ef7aca8-e11b-4b14-94c4-9b67913ea946.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9ef7aca8-e11b-4b14-94c4-9b67913ea946/9ef7aca8-e11b-4b14-94c4-9b67913ea946.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9ef7aca8-e11b-4b14-94c4-9b67913ea946/9ef7aca8-e11b-4b14-94c4-9b67913ea946.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>This deposition comes from an unnamed captain at the Metropolitan Correctional Center and provides a detailed account of how Jeffrey Epstein was managed inside the facility, particularly in the Special Housing Unit. The captain describes Epstein’s...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[This deposition comes from an unnamed captain at the Metropolitan Correctional Center and provides a detailed account of how Jeffrey Epstein was managed inside the facility, particularly in the Special Housing Unit. The captain describes Epstein’s status following his prior suicide incident, including the decision-making process around his housing, monitoring level, and classification. The testimony highlights that Epstein had previously been placed under suicide watch but was later removed from those heightened precautions, despite ongoing concerns about his mental state. It also addresses Epstein’s resistance to having a cellmate and the facility’s shifting responses to that issue, revealing a pattern where known risks were acknowledged but not consistently acted upon.<br /><br />The deposition also exposes broader operational failures within MCC, particularly regarding supervision, communication, and adherence to protocol. The captain’s account suggests that while staff were aware of Epstein’s vulnerability, the systems in place failed to ensure continuous and effective monitoring. Decisions around staffing, inmate placement, and observation procedures appear fragmented, with lapses that ultimately left Epstein in a position that contradicted earlier risk assessments. The testimony reinforces the larger picture of institutional breakdown, where responsibility was diffused across personnel and safeguards that should have been firmly in place were instead inconsistently applied.<br /><br />What makes this account difficult to accept at face value is how neatly it shifts the burden onto procedural gray areas rather than confronting the glaring contradictions in custody decisions. The captain’s testimony acknowledges that Epstein was a known suicide risk, had already experienced a prior incident, and required heightened oversight, yet still attempts to frame the subsequent downgrade in monitoring as routine or justified. That explanation strains credibility when measured against the totality of circumstances, particularly the repeated deviations from established suicide prevention protocols and the failure to enforce basic safeguards like consistent observation and appropriate cell assignments. Instead of clarifying responsibility, the deposition reads more like an exercise in institutional self-preservation—where systemic failures are reframed as isolated judgment calls, and accountability is diluted across layers of bureaucracy. In that context, the official narrative begins to look less like a coherent explanation and more like a patchwork defense designed to explain away decisions that, taken together, point to a breakdown that should never have occurred in a high-security federal facility.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00059973.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00059973.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3757</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  MCC Captain's Statement Detailing The Death Of Jeffrey Epstein (Part 11-13) (6/7/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-mcc-captain-s-statement-detailing-the-death-of-jeffrey-epstein-part-11-13-6-7-26--72390391</link><description><![CDATA[This deposition comes from an unnamed captain at the Metropolitan Correctional Center and provides a detailed account of how Jeffrey Epstein was managed inside the facility, particularly in the Special Housing Unit. The captain describes Epstein’s status following his prior suicide incident, including the decision-making process around his housing, monitoring level, and classification. The testimony highlights that Epstein had previously been placed under suicide watch but was later removed from those heightened precautions, despite ongoing concerns about his mental state. It also addresses Epstein’s resistance to having a cellmate and the facility’s shifting responses to that issue, revealing a pattern where known risks were acknowledged but not consistently acted upon.<br /><br />The deposition also exposes broader operational failures within MCC, particularly regarding supervision, communication, and adherence to protocol. The captain’s account suggests that while staff were aware of Epstein’s vulnerability, the systems in place failed to ensure continuous and effective monitoring. Decisions around staffing, inmate placement, and observation procedures appear fragmented, with lapses that ultimately left Epstein in a position that contradicted earlier risk assessments. The testimony reinforces the larger picture of institutional breakdown, where responsibility was diffused across personnel and safeguards that should have been firmly in place were instead inconsistently applied.<br /><br />What makes this account difficult to accept at face value is how neatly it shifts the burden onto procedural gray areas rather than confronting the glaring contradictions in custody decisions. The captain’s testimony acknowledges that Epstein was a known suicide risk, had already experienced a prior incident, and required heightened oversight, yet still attempts to frame the subsequent downgrade in monitoring as routine or justified. That explanation strains credibility when measured against the totality of circumstances, particularly the repeated deviations from established suicide prevention protocols and the failure to enforce basic safeguards like consistent observation and appropriate cell assignments. Instead of clarifying responsibility, the deposition reads more like an exercise in institutional self-preservation—where systemic failures are reframed as isolated judgment calls, and accountability is diluted across layers of bureaucracy. In that context, the official narrative begins to look less like a coherent explanation and more like a patchwork defense designed to explain away decisions that, taken together, point to a breakdown that should never have occurred in a high-security federal facility.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00059973.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00059973.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72390391</guid><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72390391/megacaptain11n12n13.mp3" length="39909294" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/123d955d-cd01-4a9a-81fb-82cc332dea57/123d955d-cd01-4a9a-81fb-82cc332dea57.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/123d955d-cd01-4a9a-81fb-82cc332dea57/123d955d-cd01-4a9a-81fb-82cc332dea57.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/123d955d-cd01-4a9a-81fb-82cc332dea57/123d955d-cd01-4a9a-81fb-82cc332dea57.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>This deposition comes from an unnamed captain at the Metropolitan Correctional Center and provides a detailed account of how Jeffrey Epstein was managed inside the facility, particularly in the Special Housing Unit. The captain describes Epstein’s...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[This deposition comes from an unnamed captain at the Metropolitan Correctional Center and provides a detailed account of how Jeffrey Epstein was managed inside the facility, particularly in the Special Housing Unit. The captain describes Epstein’s status following his prior suicide incident, including the decision-making process around his housing, monitoring level, and classification. The testimony highlights that Epstein had previously been placed under suicide watch but was later removed from those heightened precautions, despite ongoing concerns about his mental state. It also addresses Epstein’s resistance to having a cellmate and the facility’s shifting responses to that issue, revealing a pattern where known risks were acknowledged but not consistently acted upon.<br /><br />The deposition also exposes broader operational failures within MCC, particularly regarding supervision, communication, and adherence to protocol. The captain’s account suggests that while staff were aware of Epstein’s vulnerability, the systems in place failed to ensure continuous and effective monitoring. Decisions around staffing, inmate placement, and observation procedures appear fragmented, with lapses that ultimately left Epstein in a position that contradicted earlier risk assessments. The testimony reinforces the larger picture of institutional breakdown, where responsibility was diffused across personnel and safeguards that should have been firmly in place were instead inconsistently applied.<br /><br />What makes this account difficult to accept at face value is how neatly it shifts the burden onto procedural gray areas rather than confronting the glaring contradictions in custody decisions. The captain’s testimony acknowledges that Epstein was a known suicide risk, had already experienced a prior incident, and required heightened oversight, yet still attempts to frame the subsequent downgrade in monitoring as routine or justified. That explanation strains credibility when measured against the totality of circumstances, particularly the repeated deviations from established suicide prevention protocols and the failure to enforce basic safeguards like consistent observation and appropriate cell assignments. Instead of clarifying responsibility, the deposition reads more like an exercise in institutional self-preservation—where systemic failures are reframed as isolated judgment calls, and accountability is diluted across layers of bureaucracy. In that context, the official narrative begins to look less like a coherent explanation and more like a patchwork defense designed to explain away decisions that, taken together, point to a breakdown that should never have occurred in a high-security federal facility.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00059973.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00059973.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2495</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  MCC Captain's Statement Detailing The Death Of Jeffrey Epstein (Part 8-10) (6/7/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-mcc-captain-s-statement-detailing-the-death-of-jeffrey-epstein-part-8-10-6-7-26--72390390</link><description><![CDATA[This deposition comes from an unnamed captain at the Metropolitan Correctional Center and provides a detailed account of how Jeffrey Epstein was managed inside the facility, particularly in the Special Housing Unit. The captain describes Epstein’s status following his prior suicide incident, including the decision-making process around his housing, monitoring level, and classification. The testimony highlights that Epstein had previously been placed under suicide watch but was later removed from those heightened precautions, despite ongoing concerns about his mental state. It also addresses Epstein’s resistance to having a cellmate and the facility’s shifting responses to that issue, revealing a pattern where known risks were acknowledged but not consistently acted upon.<br /><br />The deposition also exposes broader operational failures within MCC, particularly regarding supervision, communication, and adherence to protocol. The captain’s account suggests that while staff were aware of Epstein’s vulnerability, the systems in place failed to ensure continuous and effective monitoring. Decisions around staffing, inmate placement, and observation procedures appear fragmented, with lapses that ultimately left Epstein in a position that contradicted earlier risk assessments. The testimony reinforces the larger picture of institutional breakdown, where responsibility was diffused across personnel and safeguards that should have been firmly in place were instead inconsistently applied.<br /><br />What makes this account difficult to accept at face value is how neatly it shifts the burden onto procedural gray areas rather than confronting the glaring contradictions in custody decisions. The captain’s testimony acknowledges that Epstein was a known suicide risk, had already experienced a prior incident, and required heightened oversight, yet still attempts to frame the subsequent downgrade in monitoring as routine or justified. That explanation strains credibility when measured against the totality of circumstances, particularly the repeated deviations from established suicide prevention protocols and the failure to enforce basic safeguards like consistent observation and appropriate cell assignments. Instead of clarifying responsibility, the deposition reads more like an exercise in institutional self-preservation—where systemic failures are reframed as isolated judgment calls, and accountability is diluted across layers of bureaucracy. In that context, the official narrative begins to look less like a coherent explanation and more like a patchwork defense designed to explain away decisions that, taken together, point to a breakdown that should never have occurred in a high-security federal facility.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00059973.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00059973.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72390390</guid><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 10:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72390390/megaunnamedcaptain8n9n10.mp3" length="39159893" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/71bc4562-ec00-49ec-aea2-a9dabf17ec8c/71bc4562-ec00-49ec-aea2-a9dabf17ec8c.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/71bc4562-ec00-49ec-aea2-a9dabf17ec8c/71bc4562-ec00-49ec-aea2-a9dabf17ec8c.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/71bc4562-ec00-49ec-aea2-a9dabf17ec8c/71bc4562-ec00-49ec-aea2-a9dabf17ec8c.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>This deposition comes from an unnamed captain at the Metropolitan Correctional Center and provides a detailed account of how Jeffrey Epstein was managed inside the facility, particularly in the Special Housing Unit. The captain describes Epstein’s...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[This deposition comes from an unnamed captain at the Metropolitan Correctional Center and provides a detailed account of how Jeffrey Epstein was managed inside the facility, particularly in the Special Housing Unit. The captain describes Epstein’s status following his prior suicide incident, including the decision-making process around his housing, monitoring level, and classification. The testimony highlights that Epstein had previously been placed under suicide watch but was later removed from those heightened precautions, despite ongoing concerns about his mental state. It also addresses Epstein’s resistance to having a cellmate and the facility’s shifting responses to that issue, revealing a pattern where known risks were acknowledged but not consistently acted upon.<br /><br />The deposition also exposes broader operational failures within MCC, particularly regarding supervision, communication, and adherence to protocol. The captain’s account suggests that while staff were aware of Epstein’s vulnerability, the systems in place failed to ensure continuous and effective monitoring. Decisions around staffing, inmate placement, and observation procedures appear fragmented, with lapses that ultimately left Epstein in a position that contradicted earlier risk assessments. The testimony reinforces the larger picture of institutional breakdown, where responsibility was diffused across personnel and safeguards that should have been firmly in place were instead inconsistently applied.<br /><br />What makes this account difficult to accept at face value is how neatly it shifts the burden onto procedural gray areas rather than confronting the glaring contradictions in custody decisions. The captain’s testimony acknowledges that Epstein was a known suicide risk, had already experienced a prior incident, and required heightened oversight, yet still attempts to frame the subsequent downgrade in monitoring as routine or justified. That explanation strains credibility when measured against the totality of circumstances, particularly the repeated deviations from established suicide prevention protocols and the failure to enforce basic safeguards like consistent observation and appropriate cell assignments. Instead of clarifying responsibility, the deposition reads more like an exercise in institutional self-preservation—where systemic failures are reframed as isolated judgment calls, and accountability is diluted across layers of bureaucracy. In that context, the official narrative begins to look less like a coherent explanation and more like a patchwork defense designed to explain away decisions that, taken together, point to a breakdown that should never have occurred in a high-security federal facility.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00059973.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00059973.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2448</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  MCC Captain's Statement Detailing The Death Of Jeffrey Epstein (Part 4-7) (6/7/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-mcc-captain-s-statement-detailing-the-death-of-jeffrey-epstein-part-4-7-6-7-26--72390389</link><description><![CDATA[This deposition comes from an unnamed captain at the Metropolitan Correctional Center and provides a detailed account of how Jeffrey Epstein was managed inside the facility, particularly in the Special Housing Unit. The captain describes Epstein’s status following his prior suicide incident, including the decision-making process around his housing, monitoring level, and classification. The testimony highlights that Epstein had previously been placed under suicide watch but was later removed from those heightened precautions, despite ongoing concerns about his mental state. It also addresses Epstein’s resistance to having a cellmate and the facility’s shifting responses to that issue, revealing a pattern where known risks were acknowledged but not consistently acted upon.<br /><br />The deposition also exposes broader operational failures within MCC, particularly regarding supervision, communication, and adherence to protocol. The captain’s account suggests that while staff were aware of Epstein’s vulnerability, the systems in place failed to ensure continuous and effective monitoring. Decisions around staffing, inmate placement, and observation procedures appear fragmented, with lapses that ultimately left Epstein in a position that contradicted earlier risk assessments. The testimony reinforces the larger picture of institutional breakdown, where responsibility was diffused across personnel and safeguards that should have been firmly in place were instead inconsistently applied.<br /><br />What makes this account difficult to accept at face value is how neatly it shifts the burden onto procedural gray areas rather than confronting the glaring contradictions in custody decisions. The captain’s testimony acknowledges that Epstein was a known suicide risk, had already experienced a prior incident, and required heightened oversight, yet still attempts to frame the subsequent downgrade in monitoring as routine or justified. That explanation strains credibility when measured against the totality of circumstances, particularly the repeated deviations from established suicide prevention protocols and the failure to enforce basic safeguards like consistent observation and appropriate cell assignments. Instead of clarifying responsibility, the deposition reads more like an exercise in institutional self-preservation—where systemic failures are reframed as isolated judgment calls, and accountability is diluted across layers of bureaucracy. In that context, the official narrative begins to look less like a coherent explanation and more like a patchwork defense designed to explain away decisions that, taken together, point to a breakdown that should never have occurred in a high-security federal facility.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00059973.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00059973.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72390389</guid><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72390389/megaunnamedcaptain_4n5n6n7.mp3" length="46462476" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d2a90019-e287-41dc-8a7b-bc85f2cbe110/d2a90019-e287-41dc-8a7b-bc85f2cbe110.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d2a90019-e287-41dc-8a7b-bc85f2cbe110/d2a90019-e287-41dc-8a7b-bc85f2cbe110.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d2a90019-e287-41dc-8a7b-bc85f2cbe110/d2a90019-e287-41dc-8a7b-bc85f2cbe110.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>This deposition comes from an unnamed captain at the Metropolitan Correctional Center and provides a detailed account of how Jeffrey Epstein was managed inside the facility, particularly in the Special Housing Unit. The captain describes Epstein’s...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[This deposition comes from an unnamed captain at the Metropolitan Correctional Center and provides a detailed account of how Jeffrey Epstein was managed inside the facility, particularly in the Special Housing Unit. The captain describes Epstein’s status following his prior suicide incident, including the decision-making process around his housing, monitoring level, and classification. The testimony highlights that Epstein had previously been placed under suicide watch but was later removed from those heightened precautions, despite ongoing concerns about his mental state. It also addresses Epstein’s resistance to having a cellmate and the facility’s shifting responses to that issue, revealing a pattern where known risks were acknowledged but not consistently acted upon.<br /><br />The deposition also exposes broader operational failures within MCC, particularly regarding supervision, communication, and adherence to protocol. The captain’s account suggests that while staff were aware of Epstein’s vulnerability, the systems in place failed to ensure continuous and effective monitoring. Decisions around staffing, inmate placement, and observation procedures appear fragmented, with lapses that ultimately left Epstein in a position that contradicted earlier risk assessments. The testimony reinforces the larger picture of institutional breakdown, where responsibility was diffused across personnel and safeguards that should have been firmly in place were instead inconsistently applied.<br /><br />What makes this account difficult to accept at face value is how neatly it shifts the burden onto procedural gray areas rather than confronting the glaring contradictions in custody decisions. The captain’s testimony acknowledges that Epstein was a known suicide risk, had already experienced a prior incident, and required heightened oversight, yet still attempts to frame the subsequent downgrade in monitoring as routine or justified. That explanation strains credibility when measured against the totality of circumstances, particularly the repeated deviations from established suicide prevention protocols and the failure to enforce basic safeguards like consistent observation and appropriate cell assignments. Instead of clarifying responsibility, the deposition reads more like an exercise in institutional self-preservation—where systemic failures are reframed as isolated judgment calls, and accountability is diluted across layers of bureaucracy. In that context, the official narrative begins to look less like a coherent explanation and more like a patchwork defense designed to explain away decisions that, taken together, point to a breakdown that should never have occurred in a high-security federal facility.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00059973.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00059973.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2904</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  MCC Captain's Statement Detailing The Death Of Jeffrey Epstein (Part 1-3) (6/6/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-mcc-captain-s-statement-detailing-the-death-of-jeffrey-epstein-part-1-3-6-6-26--72390388</link><description><![CDATA[This deposition comes from an unnamed captain at the Metropolitan Correctional Center and provides a detailed account of how Jeffrey Epstein was managed inside the facility, particularly in the Special Housing Unit. The captain describes Epstein’s status following his prior suicide incident, including the decision-making process around his housing, monitoring level, and classification. The testimony highlights that Epstein had previously been placed under suicide watch but was later removed from those heightened precautions, despite ongoing concerns about his mental state. It also addresses Epstein’s resistance to having a cellmate and the facility’s shifting responses to that issue, revealing a pattern where known risks were acknowledged but not consistently acted upon.<br /><br />The deposition also exposes broader operational failures within MCC, particularly regarding supervision, communication, and adherence to protocol. The captain’s account suggests that while staff were aware of Epstein’s vulnerability, the systems in place failed to ensure continuous and effective monitoring. Decisions around staffing, inmate placement, and observation procedures appear fragmented, with lapses that ultimately left Epstein in a position that contradicted earlier risk assessments. The testimony reinforces the larger picture of institutional breakdown, where responsibility was diffused across personnel and safeguards that should have been firmly in place were instead inconsistently applied.<br /><br />What makes this account difficult to accept at face value is how neatly it shifts the burden onto procedural gray areas rather than confronting the glaring contradictions in custody decisions. The captain’s testimony acknowledges that Epstein was a known suicide risk, had already experienced a prior incident, and required heightened oversight, yet still attempts to frame the subsequent downgrade in monitoring as routine or justified. That explanation strains credibility when measured against the totality of circumstances, particularly the repeated deviations from established suicide prevention protocols and the failure to enforce basic safeguards like consistent observation and appropriate cell assignments. Instead of clarifying responsibility, the deposition reads more like an exercise in institutional self-preservation—where systemic failures are reframed as isolated judgment calls, and accountability is diluted across layers of bureaucracy. In that context, the official narrative begins to look less like a coherent explanation and more like a patchwork defense designed to explain away decisions that, taken together, point to a breakdown that should never have occurred in a high-security federal facility.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00059973.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00059973.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72390388</guid><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72390388/megaunnamedcaptain1n2n3.mp3" length="38618636" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2b8d4ad3-5a7d-4dd8-97d4-c69ffd200856/2b8d4ad3-5a7d-4dd8-97d4-c69ffd200856.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2b8d4ad3-5a7d-4dd8-97d4-c69ffd200856/2b8d4ad3-5a7d-4dd8-97d4-c69ffd200856.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2b8d4ad3-5a7d-4dd8-97d4-c69ffd200856/2b8d4ad3-5a7d-4dd8-97d4-c69ffd200856.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>This deposition comes from an unnamed captain at the Metropolitan Correctional Center and provides a detailed account of how Jeffrey Epstein was managed inside the facility, particularly in the Special Housing Unit. The captain describes Epstein’s...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[This deposition comes from an unnamed captain at the Metropolitan Correctional Center and provides a detailed account of how Jeffrey Epstein was managed inside the facility, particularly in the Special Housing Unit. The captain describes Epstein’s status following his prior suicide incident, including the decision-making process around his housing, monitoring level, and classification. The testimony highlights that Epstein had previously been placed under suicide watch but was later removed from those heightened precautions, despite ongoing concerns about his mental state. It also addresses Epstein’s resistance to having a cellmate and the facility’s shifting responses to that issue, revealing a pattern where known risks were acknowledged but not consistently acted upon.<br /><br />The deposition also exposes broader operational failures within MCC, particularly regarding supervision, communication, and adherence to protocol. The captain’s account suggests that while staff were aware of Epstein’s vulnerability, the systems in place failed to ensure continuous and effective monitoring. Decisions around staffing, inmate placement, and observation procedures appear fragmented, with lapses that ultimately left Epstein in a position that contradicted earlier risk assessments. The testimony reinforces the larger picture of institutional breakdown, where responsibility was diffused across personnel and safeguards that should have been firmly in place were instead inconsistently applied.<br /><br />What makes this account difficult to accept at face value is how neatly it shifts the burden onto procedural gray areas rather than confronting the glaring contradictions in custody decisions. The captain’s testimony acknowledges that Epstein was a known suicide risk, had already experienced a prior incident, and required heightened oversight, yet still attempts to frame the subsequent downgrade in monitoring as routine or justified. That explanation strains credibility when measured against the totality of circumstances, particularly the repeated deviations from established suicide prevention protocols and the failure to enforce basic safeguards like consistent observation and appropriate cell assignments. Instead of clarifying responsibility, the deposition reads more like an exercise in institutional self-preservation—where systemic failures are reframed as isolated judgment calls, and accountability is diluted across layers of bureaucracy. In that context, the official narrative begins to look less like a coherent explanation and more like a patchwork defense designed to explain away decisions that, taken together, point to a breakdown that should never have occurred in a high-security federal facility.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00059973.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00059973.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2414</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The Many Layers That Made Up The Friendship Of Andrew And Ghislaine (6/6/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-many-layers-that-made-up-the-friendship-of-andrew-and-ghislaine-6-6-26--72374111</link><description><![CDATA[Prince Andrew and Ghislaine Maxwell were repeatedly described as unusually close, long-running friends whose relationship predated much of the public Epstein scandal and helped place Andrew inside Epstein’s social orbit. Andrew has said he knew Maxwell from her university years at Oxford, and he has acknowledged that he met Epstein through her, although later accounts and released records have raised questions about the exact timeline. Over the years, Andrew and Maxwell were photographed and reported together in elite social settings in New York, London, and elsewhere, with Maxwell functioning as a bridge between Andrew and Epstein’s world. Their closeness became central to the scandal because Maxwell was not some distant acquaintance in Andrew’s life; she was a trusted social contact with access to him, his homes, and his circle.<br /><br />That relationship did not simply vanish once Maxwell was arrested and later convicted. Publicly, Andrew distanced himself from the entire Epstein network, but reporting and released materials have continued to suggest that the bond between Andrew and Maxwell remained warmer and more complicated than the official posture implied. Maxwell herself referred to Andrew as a “dear friend” after her conviction and said she still cared about what was happening to him, while later Epstein-file releases included emails believed to be between Andrew and Maxwell, including one in which the sender appeared to ask about “new inappropriate friends.” The picture that emerges is of a friendship that became politically and legally toxic, forcing it out of public view, but not necessarily erasing the personal loyalty and familiarity that had existed for years.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72374111</guid><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72374111/megamaxwellbffandrew.mp3" length="42785719" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/414825ce-dac0-45ac-8b14-efa55bfec830/414825ce-dac0-45ac-8b14-efa55bfec830.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/414825ce-dac0-45ac-8b14-efa55bfec830/414825ce-dac0-45ac-8b14-efa55bfec830.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/414825ce-dac0-45ac-8b14-efa55bfec830/414825ce-dac0-45ac-8b14-efa55bfec830.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Prince Andrew and Ghislaine Maxwell were repeatedly described as unusually close, long-running friends whose relationship predated much of the public Epstein scandal and helped place Andrew inside Epstein’s social orbit. Andrew has said he knew...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Prince Andrew and Ghislaine Maxwell were repeatedly described as unusually close, long-running friends whose relationship predated much of the public Epstein scandal and helped place Andrew inside Epstein’s social orbit. Andrew has said he knew Maxwell from her university years at Oxford, and he has acknowledged that he met Epstein through her, although later accounts and released records have raised questions about the exact timeline. Over the years, Andrew and Maxwell were photographed and reported together in elite social settings in New York, London, and elsewhere, with Maxwell functioning as a bridge between Andrew and Epstein’s world. Their closeness became central to the scandal because Maxwell was not some distant acquaintance in Andrew’s life; she was a trusted social contact with access to him, his homes, and his circle.<br /><br />That relationship did not simply vanish once Maxwell was arrested and later convicted. Publicly, Andrew distanced himself from the entire Epstein network, but reporting and released materials have continued to suggest that the bond between Andrew and Maxwell remained warmer and more complicated than the official posture implied. Maxwell herself referred to Andrew as a “dear friend” after her conviction and said she still cared about what was happening to him, while later Epstein-file releases included emails believed to be between Andrew and Maxwell, including one in which the sender appeared to ask about “new inappropriate friends.” The picture that emerges is of a friendship that became politically and legally toxic, forcing it out of public view, but not necessarily erasing the personal loyalty and familiarity that had existed for years.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2675</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Expert Witness Report Of Bernard J. Jansen In Support Of Virginia Roberts (Part 3)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-expert-witness-report-of-bernard-j-jansen-in-support-of-virginia-roberts-part-3--72370908</link><description><![CDATA[In the defamation case Giuffre brought against Maxwell over Maxwell’s public denial of Giuffre’s trafficking allegations, Bernard J. Jansen provided a sworn expert witness report designed to corroborate Giuffre’s credibility and the consistency of her disclosures over time. According to the description of his testimony, Jansen asserted that Giuffre had repeatedly and privately disclosed her experiences of sexual abuse by powerful individuals in Epstein’s circle well before the allegations became public, and that she did so without any signs of fabrication, exaggeration, or personal motive to deceive. His report emphasized that these prior disclosures aligned with her later public claims and supported the contention that her testimony was grounded in firsthand experience rather than invented narrative.<br /><br />Jansen’s report was introduced to strengthen Giuffre’s position against Maxwell’s efforts to dismiss or discredit her allegations by arguing that Giuffre’s account was not a sudden public invention but reflected a history of consistent reporting to a trusted professional. In essence, Jansen’s expert opinion countered attempts to characterize Giuffre’s claims as unreliable or malicious, presenting them instead as credible statements from someone who had long communicated her experiences in confidence and had no evident incentive to fabricate them.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72370908</guid><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 04:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72370908/bjanexpertwit3.mp3" length="12547178" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2aececee-720c-4826-9c5d-8c3a232869fc/2aececee-720c-4826-9c5d-8c3a232869fc.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2aececee-720c-4826-9c5d-8c3a232869fc/2aececee-720c-4826-9c5d-8c3a232869fc.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2aececee-720c-4826-9c5d-8c3a232869fc/2aececee-720c-4826-9c5d-8c3a232869fc.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In the defamation case Giuffre brought against Maxwell over Maxwell’s public denial of Giuffre’s trafficking allegations, Bernard J. Jansen provided a sworn expert witness report designed to corroborate Giuffre’s credibility and the consistency of her...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In the defamation case Giuffre brought against Maxwell over Maxwell’s public denial of Giuffre’s trafficking allegations, Bernard J. Jansen provided a sworn expert witness report designed to corroborate Giuffre’s credibility and the consistency of her disclosures over time. According to the description of his testimony, Jansen asserted that Giuffre had repeatedly and privately disclosed her experiences of sexual abuse by powerful individuals in Epstein’s circle well before the allegations became public, and that she did so without any signs of fabrication, exaggeration, or personal motive to deceive. His report emphasized that these prior disclosures aligned with her later public claims and supported the contention that her testimony was grounded in firsthand experience rather than invented narrative.<br /><br />Jansen’s report was introduced to strengthen Giuffre’s position against Maxwell’s efforts to dismiss or discredit her allegations by arguing that Giuffre’s account was not a sudden public invention but reflected a history of consistent reporting to a trusted professional. In essence, Jansen’s expert opinion countered attempts to characterize Giuffre’s claims as unreliable or malicious, presenting them instead as credible statements from someone who had long communicated her experiences in confidence and had no evident incentive to fabricate them.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>785</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Expert Witness Report Of Bernard J. Jansen In Support Of Virginia Roberts (Part 2)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-expert-witness-report-of-bernard-j-jansen-in-support-of-virginia-roberts-part-2--72370907</link><description><![CDATA[In the defamation case Giuffre brought against Maxwell over Maxwell’s public denial of Giuffre’s trafficking allegations, Bernard J. Jansen provided a sworn expert witness report designed to corroborate Giuffre’s credibility and the consistency of her disclosures over time. According to the description of his testimony, Jansen asserted that Giuffre had repeatedly and privately disclosed her experiences of sexual abuse by powerful individuals in Epstein’s circle well before the allegations became public, and that she did so without any signs of fabrication, exaggeration, or personal motive to deceive. His report emphasized that these prior disclosures aligned with her later public claims and supported the contention that her testimony was grounded in firsthand experience rather than invented narrative.<br /><br />Jansen’s report was introduced to strengthen Giuffre’s position against Maxwell’s efforts to dismiss or discredit her allegations by arguing that Giuffre’s account was not a sudden public invention but reflected a history of consistent reporting to a trusted professional. In essence, Jansen’s expert opinion countered attempts to characterize Giuffre’s claims as unreliable or malicious, presenting them instead as credible statements from someone who had long communicated her experiences in confidence and had no evident incentive to fabricate them.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72370907</guid><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72370907/bjanexpertwit2.mp3" length="15459518" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8e60fccd-40f4-420d-97e8-92fda9025961/8e60fccd-40f4-420d-97e8-92fda9025961.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8e60fccd-40f4-420d-97e8-92fda9025961/8e60fccd-40f4-420d-97e8-92fda9025961.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8e60fccd-40f4-420d-97e8-92fda9025961/8e60fccd-40f4-420d-97e8-92fda9025961.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In the defamation case Giuffre brought against Maxwell over Maxwell’s public denial of Giuffre’s trafficking allegations, Bernard J. Jansen provided a sworn expert witness report designed to corroborate Giuffre’s credibility and the consistency of her...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In the defamation case Giuffre brought against Maxwell over Maxwell’s public denial of Giuffre’s trafficking allegations, Bernard J. Jansen provided a sworn expert witness report designed to corroborate Giuffre’s credibility and the consistency of her disclosures over time. According to the description of his testimony, Jansen asserted that Giuffre had repeatedly and privately disclosed her experiences of sexual abuse by powerful individuals in Epstein’s circle well before the allegations became public, and that she did so without any signs of fabrication, exaggeration, or personal motive to deceive. His report emphasized that these prior disclosures aligned with her later public claims and supported the contention that her testimony was grounded in firsthand experience rather than invented narrative.<br /><br />Jansen’s report was introduced to strengthen Giuffre’s position against Maxwell’s efforts to dismiss or discredit her allegations by arguing that Giuffre’s account was not a sudden public invention but reflected a history of consistent reporting to a trusted professional. In essence, Jansen’s expert opinion countered attempts to characterize Giuffre’s claims as unreliable or malicious, presenting them instead as credible statements from someone who had long communicated her experiences in confidence and had no evident incentive to fabricate them.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>967</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Expert Witness Report Of Bernard J. Jansen In Support Of Virginia Roberts (Part 1)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-expert-witness-report-of-bernard-j-jansen-in-support-of-virginia-roberts-part-1--72370909</link><description><![CDATA[In the defamation case Giuffre brought against Maxwell over Maxwell’s public denial of Giuffre’s trafficking allegations, Bernard J. Jansen provided a sworn expert witness report designed to corroborate Giuffre’s credibility and the consistency of her disclosures over time. According to the description of his testimony, Jansen asserted that Giuffre had repeatedly and privately disclosed her experiences of sexual abuse by powerful individuals in Epstein’s circle well before the allegations became public, and that she did so without any signs of fabrication, exaggeration, or personal motive to deceive. His report emphasized that these prior disclosures aligned with her later public claims and supported the contention that her testimony was grounded in firsthand experience rather than invented narrative.<br /><br />Jansen’s report was introduced to strengthen Giuffre’s position against Maxwell’s efforts to dismiss or discredit her allegations by arguing that Giuffre’s account was not a sudden public invention but reflected a history of consistent reporting to a trusted professional. In essence, Jansen’s expert opinion countered attempts to characterize Giuffre’s claims as unreliable or malicious, presenting them instead as credible statements from someone who had long communicated her experiences in confidence and had no evident incentive to fabricate them.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72370909</guid><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72370909/bjanexpertwit1.mp3" length="12014698" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7627387a-8566-4c08-a82f-7a885d7a9362/7627387a-8566-4c08-a82f-7a885d7a9362.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7627387a-8566-4c08-a82f-7a885d7a9362/7627387a-8566-4c08-a82f-7a885d7a9362.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7627387a-8566-4c08-a82f-7a885d7a9362/7627387a-8566-4c08-a82f-7a885d7a9362.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In the defamation case Giuffre brought against Maxwell over Maxwell’s public denial of Giuffre’s trafficking allegations, Bernard J. Jansen provided a sworn expert witness report designed to corroborate Giuffre’s credibility and the consistency of her...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In the defamation case Giuffre brought against Maxwell over Maxwell’s public denial of Giuffre’s trafficking allegations, Bernard J. Jansen provided a sworn expert witness report designed to corroborate Giuffre’s credibility and the consistency of her disclosures over time. According to the description of his testimony, Jansen asserted that Giuffre had repeatedly and privately disclosed her experiences of sexual abuse by powerful individuals in Epstein’s circle well before the allegations became public, and that she did so without any signs of fabrication, exaggeration, or personal motive to deceive. His report emphasized that these prior disclosures aligned with her later public claims and supported the contention that her testimony was grounded in firsthand experience rather than invented narrative.<br /><br />Jansen’s report was introduced to strengthen Giuffre’s position against Maxwell’s efforts to dismiss or discredit her allegations by arguing that Giuffre’s account was not a sudden public invention but reflected a history of consistent reporting to a trusted professional. In essence, Jansen’s expert opinion countered attempts to characterize Giuffre’s claims as unreliable or malicious, presenting them instead as credible statements from someone who had long communicated her experiences in confidence and had no evident incentive to fabricate them.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>751</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Medical Examiner Kathleen Liggio And Her Epstein Investigation Report</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/medical-examiner-kathleen-liggio-and-her-epstein-investigation-report--72324194</link><description><![CDATA[Kathleen Liggio, a senior investigator with the New York City Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, prepared an investigative report documenting the scene findings and physical evidence surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s death inside the Special Housing Unit of the Metropolitan Correctional Center on August 10, 2019. Her investigation focused on reconstructing the conditions inside the cell and the physical circumstances in which Epstein was discovered. The report described Epstein being found unresponsive in a seated or kneeling position near the lower bunk with a ligature fashioned from a bedsheet tied to the bunk frame. Liggio documented the condition of the cell, the bedding materials used in the hanging, and the absence of evidence indicating a violent struggle within the confined space. The investigative summary also noted that the ligature marks on Epstein’s neck were consistent with the type of suspension observed in hangings involving improvised materials such as torn bedding. Photographic documentation, scene measurements, and evidence collection were conducted as part of the investigation, and the information was forwarded to the forensic pathologist responsible for the autopsy determination. Liggio’s role was primarily to document the death scene and gather the physical evidence that would inform the medical examiner’s final ruling regarding cause and manner of death.<br /><br />The investigative findings described in Liggio’s report supported the medical examiner’s determination that Epstein died from suicidal hanging. The report reviewed injuries identified during the autopsy, including fractures of structures in the neck, and concluded that these injuries were consistent with the mechanics of hanging, particularly in older individuals where such fractures can occur more readily. Liggio also documented the lack of defensive injuries, the positioning of the ligature, and the availability of bedding materials within the cell that could be used to construct the hanging device. Her findings did not identify physical evidence suggesting the involvement of another individual inside the cell at the time of death. The report therefore concluded that the scene evidence, autopsy findings, and investigative observations were all consistent with a self-inflicted hanging while Epstein was alone in his housing unit. While the report addressed the forensic reconstruction of the death scene, it did not evaluate the operational failures within the prison that allowed Epstein to remain unmonitored for extended periods prior to his death.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00063517.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00063517.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72324194</guid><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72324194/medicalexaminerliggioepsteindeathreport.mp3" length="10632089" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d875f0d4-5718-4dfa-be20-e6be01e8994b/d875f0d4-5718-4dfa-be20-e6be01e8994b.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d875f0d4-5718-4dfa-be20-e6be01e8994b/d875f0d4-5718-4dfa-be20-e6be01e8994b.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d875f0d4-5718-4dfa-be20-e6be01e8994b/d875f0d4-5718-4dfa-be20-e6be01e8994b.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Kathleen Liggio, a senior investigator with the New York City Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, prepared an investigative report documenting the scene findings and physical evidence surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s death inside the Special Housing...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Kathleen Liggio, a senior investigator with the New York City Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, prepared an investigative report documenting the scene findings and physical evidence surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s death inside the Special Housing Unit of the Metropolitan Correctional Center on August 10, 2019. Her investigation focused on reconstructing the conditions inside the cell and the physical circumstances in which Epstein was discovered. The report described Epstein being found unresponsive in a seated or kneeling position near the lower bunk with a ligature fashioned from a bedsheet tied to the bunk frame. Liggio documented the condition of the cell, the bedding materials used in the hanging, and the absence of evidence indicating a violent struggle within the confined space. The investigative summary also noted that the ligature marks on Epstein’s neck were consistent with the type of suspension observed in hangings involving improvised materials such as torn bedding. Photographic documentation, scene measurements, and evidence collection were conducted as part of the investigation, and the information was forwarded to the forensic pathologist responsible for the autopsy determination. Liggio’s role was primarily to document the death scene and gather the physical evidence that would inform the medical examiner’s final ruling regarding cause and manner of death.<br /><br />The investigative findings described in Liggio’s report supported the medical examiner’s determination that Epstein died from suicidal hanging. The report reviewed injuries identified during the autopsy, including fractures of structures in the neck, and concluded that these injuries were consistent with the mechanics of hanging, particularly in older individuals where such fractures can occur more readily. Liggio also documented the lack of defensive injuries, the positioning of the ligature, and the availability of bedding materials within the cell that could be used to construct the hanging device. Her findings did not identify physical evidence suggesting the involvement of another individual inside the cell at the time of death. The report therefore concluded that the scene evidence, autopsy findings, and investigative observations were all consistent with a self-inflicted hanging while Epstein was alone in his housing unit. While the report addressed the forensic reconstruction of the death scene, it did not evaluate the operational failures within the prison that allowed Epstein to remain unmonitored for extended periods prior to his death.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00063517.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00063517.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>665</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Pam Bondi Congressional Oversight Committee Epstein Related Transcript (Part 2) (6/6/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-pam-bondi-congressional-oversight-committee-epstein-related-transcript-part-2-6-6-26--72389386</link><description><![CDATA[Pam Bondi’s congressional transcript showed her trying to defend the Justice Department’s handling of the Epstein files while repeatedly distancing herself from the day-to-day mechanics of the review. She told House Oversight lawmakers that Todd Blanche was the official “in charge” of the Epstein records process, saying she did not personally conduct the document review and that the work had been delegated to him. Bondi acknowledged that mistakes were made, including redaction problems, but framed the release as a massive and difficult undertaking rather than a deliberate attempt to obstruct transparency. At the same time, she insisted the department was committed to accountability, even as lawmakers pressed her on why the disclosures remained incomplete, flawed, or slow-moving.<br /><br />The transcript also showed Bondi trying to avoid directly blaming Blanche while making clear that he was the person managing the release. She praised him as ethical and capable, but Democrats seized on her answers as evidence that Blanche, along with other DOJ and FBI officials, should be brought before Congress to explain the process in detail. Bondi also said she learned about Ghislaine Maxwell’s prison transfer from news reports, denied involvement in that decision, rejected the idea of a Maxwell pardon, and refused to discuss private conversations with Donald Trump. The result was a transcript that did not settle the Epstein files controversy, but instead widened the accountability fight by making clear that Congress still does not have a clean answer on who controlled the review, why errors happened, and whether the public has truly received the full record.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Final-Bondi-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Final-Bondi-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72389386</guid><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72389386/bonditranscript2.mp3" length="11191319" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8c36a1f9-7914-49cd-bdf5-629cf716846d/8c36a1f9-7914-49cd-bdf5-629cf716846d.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8c36a1f9-7914-49cd-bdf5-629cf716846d/8c36a1f9-7914-49cd-bdf5-629cf716846d.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8c36a1f9-7914-49cd-bdf5-629cf716846d/8c36a1f9-7914-49cd-bdf5-629cf716846d.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Pam Bondi’s congressional transcript showed her trying to defend the Justice Department’s handling of the Epstein files while repeatedly distancing herself from the day-to-day mechanics of the review. She told House Oversight lawmakers that Todd...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Pam Bondi’s congressional transcript showed her trying to defend the Justice Department’s handling of the Epstein files while repeatedly distancing herself from the day-to-day mechanics of the review. She told House Oversight lawmakers that Todd Blanche was the official “in charge” of the Epstein records process, saying she did not personally conduct the document review and that the work had been delegated to him. Bondi acknowledged that mistakes were made, including redaction problems, but framed the release as a massive and difficult undertaking rather than a deliberate attempt to obstruct transparency. At the same time, she insisted the department was committed to accountability, even as lawmakers pressed her on why the disclosures remained incomplete, flawed, or slow-moving.<br /><br />The transcript also showed Bondi trying to avoid directly blaming Blanche while making clear that he was the person managing the release. She praised him as ethical and capable, but Democrats seized on her answers as evidence that Blanche, along with other DOJ and FBI officials, should be brought before Congress to explain the process in detail. Bondi also said she learned about Ghislaine Maxwell’s prison transfer from news reports, denied involvement in that decision, rejected the idea of a Maxwell pardon, and refused to discuss private conversations with Donald Trump. The result was a transcript that did not settle the Epstein files controversy, but instead widened the accountability fight by making clear that Congress still does not have a clean answer on who controlled the review, why errors happened, and whether the public has truly received the full record.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Final-Bondi-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Final-Bondi-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>700</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Pam Bondi Congressional Oversight Committee Epstein Related Transcript (Part 1) (6/6/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-pam-bondi-congressional-oversight-committee-epstein-related-transcript-part-1-6-6-26--72389385</link><description><![CDATA[Pam Bondi’s congressional transcript showed her trying to defend the Justice Department’s handling of the Epstein files while repeatedly distancing herself from the day-to-day mechanics of the review. She told House Oversight lawmakers that Todd Blanche was the official “in charge” of the Epstein records process, saying she did not personally conduct the document review and that the work had been delegated to him. Bondi acknowledged that mistakes were made, including redaction problems, but framed the release as a massive and difficult undertaking rather than a deliberate attempt to obstruct transparency. At the same time, she insisted the department was committed to accountability, even as lawmakers pressed her on why the disclosures remained incomplete, flawed, or slow-moving.<br /><br />The transcript also showed Bondi trying to avoid directly blaming Blanche while making clear that he was the person managing the release. She praised him as ethical and capable, but Democrats seized on her answers as evidence that Blanche, along with other DOJ and FBI officials, should be brought before Congress to explain the process in detail. Bondi also said she learned about Ghislaine Maxwell’s prison transfer from news reports, denied involvement in that decision, rejected the idea of a Maxwell pardon, and refused to discuss private conversations with Donald Trump. The result was a transcript that did not settle the Epstein files controversy, but instead widened the accountability fight by making clear that Congress still does not have a clean answer on who controlled the review, why errors happened, and whether the public has truly received the full record.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Final-Bondi-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Final-Bondi-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72389385</guid><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 18:30:05 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72389385/bonditranscript1.mp3" length="14707191" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e4550332-ab34-41f4-a2ca-32f97948d0ac/e4550332-ab34-41f4-a2ca-32f97948d0ac.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e4550332-ab34-41f4-a2ca-32f97948d0ac/e4550332-ab34-41f4-a2ca-32f97948d0ac.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e4550332-ab34-41f4-a2ca-32f97948d0ac/e4550332-ab34-41f4-a2ca-32f97948d0ac.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Pam Bondi’s congressional transcript showed her trying to defend the Justice Department’s handling of the Epstein files while repeatedly distancing herself from the day-to-day mechanics of the review. She told House Oversight lawmakers that Todd...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Pam Bondi’s congressional transcript showed her trying to defend the Justice Department’s handling of the Epstein files while repeatedly distancing herself from the day-to-day mechanics of the review. She told House Oversight lawmakers that Todd Blanche was the official “in charge” of the Epstein records process, saying she did not personally conduct the document review and that the work had been delegated to him. Bondi acknowledged that mistakes were made, including redaction problems, but framed the release as a massive and difficult undertaking rather than a deliberate attempt to obstruct transparency. At the same time, she insisted the department was committed to accountability, even as lawmakers pressed her on why the disclosures remained incomplete, flawed, or slow-moving.<br /><br />The transcript also showed Bondi trying to avoid directly blaming Blanche while making clear that he was the person managing the release. She praised him as ethical and capable, but Democrats seized on her answers as evidence that Blanche, along with other DOJ and FBI officials, should be brought before Congress to explain the process in detail. Bondi also said she learned about Ghislaine Maxwell’s prison transfer from news reports, denied involvement in that decision, rejected the idea of a Maxwell pardon, and refused to discuss private conversations with Donald Trump. The result was a transcript that did not settle the Epstein files controversy, but instead widened the accountability fight by making clear that Congress still does not have a clean answer on who controlled the review, why errors happened, and whether the public has truly received the full record.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Final-Bondi-Transcript.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Final-Bondi-Transcript.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>920</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Pam Bondi Points to Todd Blanche in Epstein Files Testimony (6/6/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/pam-bondi-points-to-todd-blanche-in-epstein-files-testimony-6-6-26--72389382</link><description><![CDATA[Pam Bondi told House Oversight lawmakers that Todd Blanche, who served as her deputy at the Justice Department and whom Donald Trump plans to nominate as attorney general, was “in charge” of the DOJ’s handling and release of the Epstein files. Bondi said she did not personally conduct the document review and had delegated oversight of the process to Blanche, even as she defended the department’s broader handling of the records. Her testimony came amid continued criticism from lawmakers and survivors over redactions, disclosure mistakes, and the department’s compliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act. Bondi acknowledged that there had been redaction errors, but insisted the department had been committed to accountability and transparency.<br /><br />The testimony also showed Bondi trying to walk a narrow line: distancing herself from the operational mistakes while denying that she was blaming Blanche. She praised him as ethical and described the review as a “Herculean task,” but the transcript backed up Democratic lawmakers’ claim that she repeatedly pointed to Blanche as the person managing the release. Bondi also said she learned about Ghislaine Maxwell’s controversial prison transfer from news reports and had nothing to do with it, rejected the idea of a Maxwell pardon, and refused to discuss private conversations with Trump. Afterward, Democrats urged House Oversight Chair James Comer to bring in Blanche and FBI Director Kash Patel for questioning as the Epstein files fight continued to widen.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/04/pam-bondi-epstein-transcript" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Pam Bondi claims Todd Blanche was ‘in charge’ of ‘entire release’ of Epstein files | Pam Bondi | The Guardian</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72389382</guid><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 16:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72389382/bondiepsteintranscriptreleased.mp3" length="13189164" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0a8ab1de-70b0-46e0-a7b3-2ab5048f1b63/0a8ab1de-70b0-46e0-a7b3-2ab5048f1b63.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0a8ab1de-70b0-46e0-a7b3-2ab5048f1b63/0a8ab1de-70b0-46e0-a7b3-2ab5048f1b63.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0a8ab1de-70b0-46e0-a7b3-2ab5048f1b63/0a8ab1de-70b0-46e0-a7b3-2ab5048f1b63.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Pam Bondi told House Oversight lawmakers that Todd Blanche, who served as her deputy at the Justice Department and whom Donald Trump plans to nominate as attorney general, was “in charge” of the DOJ’s handling and release of the Epstein files. Bondi...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Pam Bondi told House Oversight lawmakers that Todd Blanche, who served as her deputy at the Justice Department and whom Donald Trump plans to nominate as attorney general, was “in charge” of the DOJ’s handling and release of the Epstein files. Bondi said she did not personally conduct the document review and had delegated oversight of the process to Blanche, even as she defended the department’s broader handling of the records. Her testimony came amid continued criticism from lawmakers and survivors over redactions, disclosure mistakes, and the department’s compliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act. Bondi acknowledged that there had been redaction errors, but insisted the department had been committed to accountability and transparency.<br /><br />The testimony also showed Bondi trying to walk a narrow line: distancing herself from the operational mistakes while denying that she was blaming Blanche. She praised him as ethical and described the review as a “Herculean task,” but the transcript backed up Democratic lawmakers’ claim that she repeatedly pointed to Blanche as the person managing the release. Bondi also said she learned about Ghislaine Maxwell’s controversial prison transfer from news reports and had nothing to do with it, rejected the idea of a Maxwell pardon, and refused to discuss private conversations with Trump. Afterward, Democrats urged House Oversight Chair James Comer to bring in Blanche and FBI Director Kash Patel for questioning as the Epstein files fight continued to widen.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/04/pam-bondi-epstein-transcript" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Pam Bondi claims Todd Blanche was ‘in charge’ of ‘entire release’ of Epstein files | Pam Bondi | The Guardian</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>825</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Jes Staley's Epstein Narrative Gets Decimated By The Epstein Files (6/6/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jes-staley-s-epstein-narrative-gets-decimated-by-the-epstein-files-6-6-26--72374120</link><description><![CDATA[Jes Staley’s Epstein narrative was built around distance, professionalism, and minimization: he repeatedly tried to frame Jeffrey Epstein as a former client or business contact from his JPMorgan days rather than a genuinely close personal associate. That version began to collapse as regulators, court filings, and released communications showed something far more intimate and sustained. Staley and Epstein exchanged more than 1,000 emails after Epstein’s 2008 conviction, with messages described by the UK Financial Conduct Authority as reflecting the “strength” of their friendship, not merely a routine banker-client relationship. The record also showed that Barclays told regulators Staley “did not have a close relationship” with Epstein and that their last contact was well before Staley joined Barclays, claims that later became central to the finding that Staley misled the FCA.<br /><br />What shattered the narrative was the sheer weight of the paper trail: affectionate language, repeated communications, personal favors, unexplained references, reported visits, and Staley’s own admission that he had consensual sex with a member of Epstein’s staff. Instead of looking like a banker who had made a regrettable professional association, Staley began to look like someone who had understated the closeness of a relationship that continued well after Epstein was publicly known as a convicted sex offender. The consequences were severe: Staley resigned from Barclays in 2021, was fined and banned by the FCA from holding senior financial roles, then failed to overturn that ban in 2025 after a tribunal found he had acted without integrity in how he handled the Epstein questions. Now, with Staley set to appear before the House Oversight Committee on July 23, the same basic issue follows him into Congress: his public version of the Epstein relationship has repeatedly failed when placed against the documentary record.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72374120</guid><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72374120/megarealitymeetsstaleynarratives.mp3" length="39912250" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/88220e55-1d35-4ab2-b94c-a99bdb24d565/88220e55-1d35-4ab2-b94c-a99bdb24d565.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/88220e55-1d35-4ab2-b94c-a99bdb24d565/88220e55-1d35-4ab2-b94c-a99bdb24d565.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/88220e55-1d35-4ab2-b94c-a99bdb24d565/88220e55-1d35-4ab2-b94c-a99bdb24d565.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jes Staley’s Epstein narrative was built around distance, professionalism, and minimization: he repeatedly tried to frame Jeffrey Epstein as a former client or business contact from his JPMorgan days rather than a genuinely close personal associate....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jes Staley’s Epstein narrative was built around distance, professionalism, and minimization: he repeatedly tried to frame Jeffrey Epstein as a former client or business contact from his JPMorgan days rather than a genuinely close personal associate. That version began to collapse as regulators, court filings, and released communications showed something far more intimate and sustained. Staley and Epstein exchanged more than 1,000 emails after Epstein’s 2008 conviction, with messages described by the UK Financial Conduct Authority as reflecting the “strength” of their friendship, not merely a routine banker-client relationship. The record also showed that Barclays told regulators Staley “did not have a close relationship” with Epstein and that their last contact was well before Staley joined Barclays, claims that later became central to the finding that Staley misled the FCA.<br /><br />What shattered the narrative was the sheer weight of the paper trail: affectionate language, repeated communications, personal favors, unexplained references, reported visits, and Staley’s own admission that he had consensual sex with a member of Epstein’s staff. Instead of looking like a banker who had made a regrettable professional association, Staley began to look like someone who had understated the closeness of a relationship that continued well after Epstein was publicly known as a convicted sex offender. The consequences were severe: Staley resigned from Barclays in 2021, was fined and banned by the FCA from holding senior financial roles, then failed to overturn that ban in 2025 after a tribunal found he had acted without integrity in how he handled the Epstein questions. Now, with Staley set to appear before the House Oversight Committee on July 23, the same basic issue follows him into Congress: his public version of the Epstein relationship has repeatedly failed when placed against the documentary record.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2495</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition: Peter Mandelson's Epstein Denials Vs. The Record (6/6/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-peter-mandelson-s-epstein-denials-vs-the-record-6-6-26--72374119</link><description><![CDATA[For years, Lord Peter Mandelson tried to minimize the depth and seriousness of his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, presenting it as a regrettable association from the past rather than an intimate, ongoing connection with a convicted sex offender. That version became harder to sustain as more material emerged showing that Mandelson’s relationship with Epstein was not casual, distant, or easily dismissed. A handwritten note in Epstein’s alleged birthday book reportedly referred to Epstein as Mandelson’s “best pal,” while later disclosures showed communications and financial links involving Mandelson’s husband after Epstein’s 2008 conviction and 2009 release from custody. The central problem for Mandelson was not simply that he had known Epstein, but that the public record kept suggesting a relationship far closer, warmer, and more durable than the carefully managed explanations he had offered.<br /><br />The released emails blew those denials apart because they appeared to show Mandelson engaging with Epstein as a trusted confidant and useful contact, even after Epstein was already publicly known as a convicted sex offender. What had been framed as an embarrassing old connection suddenly looked like a continuing relationship that raised questions about judgment, access, influence, and whether political elites were still willing to treat Epstein as useful despite knowing exactly who he was. The fallout was severe: Mandelson’s appointment as UK ambassador to Washington came under intense scrutiny, the vetting process became a political scandal, and the documents forced a broader reckoning over how much the government knew before putting him in such a sensitive diplomatic post. In the end, Mandelson’s problem was that the paper trail did what years of polished denials could not withstand: it made the relationship look less like a mistake from the past and more like a liability that powerful people had tried to explain away until the emails made that impossible.<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72374119</guid><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72374119/megaepsteinstiffupperlipmandelson.mp3" length="35219792" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/70a92613-8c8e-40ac-896d-792cc7f8ce78/70a92613-8c8e-40ac-896d-792cc7f8ce78.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/70a92613-8c8e-40ac-896d-792cc7f8ce78/70a92613-8c8e-40ac-896d-792cc7f8ce78.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/70a92613-8c8e-40ac-896d-792cc7f8ce78/70a92613-8c8e-40ac-896d-792cc7f8ce78.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>For years, Lord Peter Mandelson tried to minimize the depth and seriousness of his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, presenting it as a regrettable association from the past rather than an intimate, ongoing connection with a convicted sex offender....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[For years, Lord Peter Mandelson tried to minimize the depth and seriousness of his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, presenting it as a regrettable association from the past rather than an intimate, ongoing connection with a convicted sex offender. That version became harder to sustain as more material emerged showing that Mandelson’s relationship with Epstein was not casual, distant, or easily dismissed. A handwritten note in Epstein’s alleged birthday book reportedly referred to Epstein as Mandelson’s “best pal,” while later disclosures showed communications and financial links involving Mandelson’s husband after Epstein’s 2008 conviction and 2009 release from custody. The central problem for Mandelson was not simply that he had known Epstein, but that the public record kept suggesting a relationship far closer, warmer, and more durable than the carefully managed explanations he had offered.<br /><br />The released emails blew those denials apart because they appeared to show Mandelson engaging with Epstein as a trusted confidant and useful contact, even after Epstein was already publicly known as a convicted sex offender. What had been framed as an embarrassing old connection suddenly looked like a continuing relationship that raised questions about judgment, access, influence, and whether political elites were still willing to treat Epstein as useful despite knowing exactly who he was. The fallout was severe: Mandelson’s appointment as UK ambassador to Washington came under intense scrutiny, the vetting process became a political scandal, and the documents forced a broader reckoning over how much the government knew before putting him in such a sensitive diplomatic post. In the end, Mandelson’s problem was that the paper trail did what years of polished denials could not withstand: it made the relationship look less like a mistake from the past and more like a liability that powerful people had tried to explain away until the emails made that impossible.<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2202</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Jeffrey Epstein And The Revolving Door Of A List Lawyers (6/6/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-the-revolving-door-of-a-list-lawyers-6-6-26--72374110</link><description><![CDATA[Darren Indyke was one of Jeffrey Epstein’s longest-serving and most important lawyers, operating less like a courtroom-only defense attorney and more like a central legal-business figure inside Epstein’s private empire. He handled Epstein-related corporate, estate, trust, and legal affairs for years, was named as one of the executors of Epstein’s estate, and later became a major figure in litigation brought by victims who alleged that Epstein’s financial and legal infrastructure helped facilitate and conceal abuse. Indyke and Epstein accountant Richard Kahn were accused in civil litigation of helping maintain the machinery around Epstein, though they denied wrongdoing and reached a settlement without admitting liability. Indyke’s role matters because he was not simply a late-stage defense lawyer brought in after arrest; he was embedded in Epstein’s long-term legal and financial structure.<br /><br />Ken Starr entered Epstein’s orbit during the Florida federal investigation and became part of the high-powered legal team that helped Epstein secure the infamous 2008 non-prosecution agreement. Starr’s involvement was especially controversial because he had been one of the most famous prosecutors in America, yet in Epstein’s case he helped apply pressure from the defense side during the negotiations that produced a deal widely condemned as extraordinarily lenient. David Schoen also represented Epstein briefly near the end of Epstein’s life in 2019, visiting him shortly before his death and later speaking publicly about Epstein and the unresolved questions surrounding the case. Taken together, Indyke, Starr, and Schoen represent three different layers of Epstein’s legal protection: the longtime insider lawyer, the elite plea-deal strategist, and the late-stage criminal defense attorney brought in during Epstein’s final federal prosecution.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72374110</guid><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 10:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72374110/megaepsteinlawyersstarrschoenindyke.mp3" length="48545585" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/41d92e47-9b5f-4941-9d99-25da5d2222b8/41d92e47-9b5f-4941-9d99-25da5d2222b8.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/41d92e47-9b5f-4941-9d99-25da5d2222b8/41d92e47-9b5f-4941-9d99-25da5d2222b8.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/41d92e47-9b5f-4941-9d99-25da5d2222b8/41d92e47-9b5f-4941-9d99-25da5d2222b8.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Darren Indyke was one of Jeffrey Epstein’s longest-serving and most important lawyers, operating less like a courtroom-only defense attorney and more like a central legal-business figure inside Epstein’s private empire. He handled Epstein-related...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Darren Indyke was one of Jeffrey Epstein’s longest-serving and most important lawyers, operating less like a courtroom-only defense attorney and more like a central legal-business figure inside Epstein’s private empire. He handled Epstein-related corporate, estate, trust, and legal affairs for years, was named as one of the executors of Epstein’s estate, and later became a major figure in litigation brought by victims who alleged that Epstein’s financial and legal infrastructure helped facilitate and conceal abuse. Indyke and Epstein accountant Richard Kahn were accused in civil litigation of helping maintain the machinery around Epstein, though they denied wrongdoing and reached a settlement without admitting liability. Indyke’s role matters because he was not simply a late-stage defense lawyer brought in after arrest; he was embedded in Epstein’s long-term legal and financial structure.<br /><br />Ken Starr entered Epstein’s orbit during the Florida federal investigation and became part of the high-powered legal team that helped Epstein secure the infamous 2008 non-prosecution agreement. Starr’s involvement was especially controversial because he had been one of the most famous prosecutors in America, yet in Epstein’s case he helped apply pressure from the defense side during the negotiations that produced a deal widely condemned as extraordinarily lenient. David Schoen also represented Epstein briefly near the end of Epstein’s life in 2019, visiting him shortly before his death and later speaking publicly about Epstein and the unresolved questions surrounding the case. Taken together, Indyke, Starr, and Schoen represent three different layers of Epstein’s legal protection: the longtime insider lawyer, the elite plea-deal strategist, and the late-stage criminal defense attorney brought in during Epstein’s final federal prosecution.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3035</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   The Royal Family And The Palace Pest Known As Andrew (6/6/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-royal-family-and-the-palace-pest-known-as-andrew-6-6-26--72374109</link><description><![CDATA[Prince Andrew’s reputation inside the royal household has long been portrayed as deeply unpopular, especially among people who worked around him rather than above him. Former palace staff and royal insiders have described him as arrogant, entitled, short-tempered, and needlessly difficult, with accounts alleging that he barked orders, swore at staff, expected extreme deference, and treated palace employees as if they existed purely to absorb his demands. One of the most widely repeated examples involved his reported obsession with how his teddy bears were arranged, with staff allegedly given instructions on their exact placement. Other accounts described him as dismissive toward servants, rude to aides, and furious when ordinary inconveniences interrupted him.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72374109</guid><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 08:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72374109/megaandrewpalacepest.mp3" length="45716419" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ea3bdcbc-5650-425f-91a9-55c80072cccb/ea3bdcbc-5650-425f-91a9-55c80072cccb.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ea3bdcbc-5650-425f-91a9-55c80072cccb/ea3bdcbc-5650-425f-91a9-55c80072cccb.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ea3bdcbc-5650-425f-91a9-55c80072cccb/ea3bdcbc-5650-425f-91a9-55c80072cccb.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Prince Andrew’s reputation inside the royal household has long been portrayed as deeply unpopular, especially among people who worked around him rather than above him. Former palace staff and royal insiders have described him as arrogant, entitled,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Prince Andrew’s reputation inside the royal household has long been portrayed as deeply unpopular, especially among people who worked around him rather than above him. Former palace staff and royal insiders have described him as arrogant, entitled, short-tempered, and needlessly difficult, with accounts alleging that he barked orders, swore at staff, expected extreme deference, and treated palace employees as if they existed purely to absorb his demands. One of the most widely repeated examples involved his reported obsession with how his teddy bears were arranged, with staff allegedly given instructions on their exact placement. Other accounts described him as dismissive toward servants, rude to aides, and furious when ordinary inconveniences interrupted him.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2858</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   Prince Andrew And The Chaos He Caused For His Parents (6/6/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-prince-andrew-and-the-chaos-he-caused-for-his-parents-6-6-26--72374118</link><description><![CDATA[Prince Andrew’s Epstein disgrace reportedly created a deep strain inside the royal family because Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip appeared to respond to the crisis from very different emotional positions. The Queen was widely portrayed as a mother who, despite the public humiliation and institutional damage, remained personally protective of Andrew for as long as she could. She allowed him to retain certain symbols of status for years after the Epstein scandal had already become a public catastrophe, and even after his disastrous 2019 BBC interview forced him to step back from public duties. Prince Philip, by contrast, was often described as far less sentimental about the damage Andrew had done to the monarchy, viewing the scandal as a disgrace that threatened the dignity, discipline, and public standing of the Crown.<br /><br /><br />That difference reportedly produced a rift because Andrew was not merely dealing with a private embarrassment; he had dragged the monarchy into the orbit of Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Virginia Giuffre’s allegations, federal scrutiny, and public outrage over elite impunity. For Philip, the scandal represented the kind of self-inflicted humiliation that the royal family could not afford, especially because Andrew’s explanations made the situation worse rather than better. For the Queen, the issue was more complicated because Andrew was still her son, and that maternal loyalty seemed to clash with the cold institutional reality that he had become a liability. In the end, the Epstein revelations exposed not only Andrew’s judgment, but also the painful divide between family loyalty and the survival instincts of the monarchy itself.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72374118</guid><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72374118/megaandrewcausedproblemsforparents.mp3" length="42183828" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d12fa7be-515e-41fa-b8ac-ceed14ee222e/d12fa7be-515e-41fa-b8ac-ceed14ee222e.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d12fa7be-515e-41fa-b8ac-ceed14ee222e/d12fa7be-515e-41fa-b8ac-ceed14ee222e.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d12fa7be-515e-41fa-b8ac-ceed14ee222e/d12fa7be-515e-41fa-b8ac-ceed14ee222e.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Prince Andrew’s Epstein disgrace reportedly created a deep strain inside the royal family because Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip appeared to respond to the crisis from very different emotional positions. The Queen was widely portrayed as a...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Prince Andrew’s Epstein disgrace reportedly created a deep strain inside the royal family because Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip appeared to respond to the crisis from very different emotional positions. The Queen was widely portrayed as a mother who, despite the public humiliation and institutional damage, remained personally protective of Andrew for as long as she could. She allowed him to retain certain symbols of status for years after the Epstein scandal had already become a public catastrophe, and even after his disastrous 2019 BBC interview forced him to step back from public duties. Prince Philip, by contrast, was often described as far less sentimental about the damage Andrew had done to the monarchy, viewing the scandal as a disgrace that threatened the dignity, discipline, and public standing of the Crown.<br /><br /><br />That difference reportedly produced a rift because Andrew was not merely dealing with a private embarrassment; he had dragged the monarchy into the orbit of Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Virginia Giuffre’s allegations, federal scrutiny, and public outrage over elite impunity. For Philip, the scandal represented the kind of self-inflicted humiliation that the royal family could not afford, especially because Andrew’s explanations made the situation worse rather than better. For the Queen, the issue was more complicated because Andrew was still her son, and that maternal loyalty seemed to clash with the cold institutional reality that he had become a liability. In the end, the Epstein revelations exposed not only Andrew’s judgment, but also the painful divide between family loyalty and the survival instincts of the monarchy itself.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2637</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Photo Shows Prince Andrew, Epstein, and Peter Mandelson Together on Martha’s Vineyard</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/photo-shows-prince-andrew-epstein-and-peter-mandelson-together-on-martha-s-vineyard--72324201</link><description><![CDATA[A newly surfaced photograph from Department of Justice files shows former Prince Andrew—now Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor—sitting barefoot in a bathrobe alongside Jeffrey Epstein and British politician Peter Mandelson at a wooden table, believed to be on Martha’s Vineyard around 1999 or 2000. The image is one of the first known photos placing all three men together in a casual setting, adding to the growing body of visual and documentary evidence linking Andrew to Epstein’s social circle during that period.<br /><br />The photo’s release has intensified scrutiny on Andrew’s longstanding relationship with Epstein, particularly as it coincides with ongoing investigations and previously disclosed communications suggesting continued contact even after Epstein’s criminal history was widely known. Authorities in the U.K. are examining allegations that Andrew shared confidential information with Epstein during his time as a trade envoy, while the broader document releases continue to raise questions about how deeply embedded Epstein was within elite political and social networks.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/former-prince-andrew-caught-barefoot-bathrobe-jeffrey-epstein-surfaced-marthas-vineyard-photo" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Former Prince Andrew pictured barefoot in bathrobe with Peter Mandelson, Epstein | Fox News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72324201</guid><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72324201/andrewmandelsonpicture.mp3" length="10956008" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/26bea214-099d-4c12-8522-b12c22563484/26bea214-099d-4c12-8522-b12c22563484.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/26bea214-099d-4c12-8522-b12c22563484/26bea214-099d-4c12-8522-b12c22563484.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/26bea214-099d-4c12-8522-b12c22563484/26bea214-099d-4c12-8522-b12c22563484.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A newly surfaced photograph from Department of Justice files shows former Prince Andrew—now Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor—sitting barefoot in a bathrobe alongside Jeffrey Epstein and British politician Peter Mandelson at a wooden table, believed to be on...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A newly surfaced photograph from Department of Justice files shows former Prince Andrew—now Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor—sitting barefoot in a bathrobe alongside Jeffrey Epstein and British politician Peter Mandelson at a wooden table, believed to be on Martha’s Vineyard around 1999 or 2000. The image is one of the first known photos placing all three men together in a casual setting, adding to the growing body of visual and documentary evidence linking Andrew to Epstein’s social circle during that period.<br /><br />The photo’s release has intensified scrutiny on Andrew’s longstanding relationship with Epstein, particularly as it coincides with ongoing investigations and previously disclosed communications suggesting continued contact even after Epstein’s criminal history was widely known. Authorities in the U.K. are examining allegations that Andrew shared confidential information with Epstein during his time as a trade envoy, while the broader document releases continue to raise questions about how deeply embedded Epstein was within elite political and social networks.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/former-prince-andrew-caught-barefoot-bathrobe-jeffrey-epstein-surfaced-marthas-vineyard-photo" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Former Prince Andrew pictured barefoot in bathrobe with Peter Mandelson, Epstein | Fox News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>685</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Former Aide Charlotte Manley Agrees to Speak With Police About Epstein-Era Royal Operation</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/former-aide-charlotte-manley-agrees-to-speak-with-police-about-epstein-era-royal-operation--72324198</link><description><![CDATA[Charlotte Manley, a longtime aide to Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor (formerly Prince Andrew), has said she is willing to speak with police about her time working for him between 1996 and 2003 as investigators revisit issues connected to the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. Manley served in several senior administrative roles, including assistant private secretary, private secretary, and treasurer, and often accompanied Andrew during his tenure as the United Kingdom’s special trade envoy. During that time she handled travel arrangements, finances, and other official matters on his behalf. One detail drawing renewed attention is a £75 cheque she signed in 2000 from a Buckingham Palace account to pay a South African masseuse whose visit to Andrew was reportedly arranged by Ghislaine Maxwell. The woman who provided the massage later said the encounter at Buckingham Palace was awkward but not inappropriate, though the episode has become part of the broader scrutiny surrounding Andrew’s associations with Epstein. Manley has indicated that if authorities want information about that period, she would rather provide it directly to police than discuss it publicly.<br /><br /><br />The renewed attention to Manley’s role comes amid a broader investigation into Andrew’s conduct and his long-standing ties to Epstein, which have drawn increased scrutiny following newly released investigative materials and recent legal developments. Andrew was arrested earlier in 2026 on suspicion of misconduct in public office related to his activities while serving as trade envoy, though he denies wrongdoing and remains under investigation. Authorities are also examining financial arrangements and other aspects of his official activities during the period when Epstein was part of his social circle. Investigators are revisiting records, payments, and travel details connected to Andrew’s past engagements, and former staff members such as Manley may provide insight into how those activities were managed administratively. Her willingness to cooperate with police therefore represents another step in the ongoing effort by investigators to reconstruct the scope of Andrew’s dealings during the years when his relationship with Epstein was most active.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.thetimes.com/uk/royal-family/article/andrews-former-pa-will-speak-to-police-about-her-time-serving-royal-mv6vz02t2" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Andrew’s former PA will speak to police about her time serving royal</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72324198</guid><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 02:35:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72324198/charlottemanley.mp3" length="12909549" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8ce1e57b-a02b-4fab-bb66-4b87406dcfcc/8ce1e57b-a02b-4fab-bb66-4b87406dcfcc.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8ce1e57b-a02b-4fab-bb66-4b87406dcfcc/8ce1e57b-a02b-4fab-bb66-4b87406dcfcc.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8ce1e57b-a02b-4fab-bb66-4b87406dcfcc/8ce1e57b-a02b-4fab-bb66-4b87406dcfcc.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Charlotte Manley, a longtime aide to Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor (formerly Prince Andrew), has said she is willing to speak with police about her time working for him between 1996 and 2003 as investigators revisit issues connected to the Jeffrey...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Charlotte Manley, a longtime aide to Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor (formerly Prince Andrew), has said she is willing to speak with police about her time working for him between 1996 and 2003 as investigators revisit issues connected to the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. Manley served in several senior administrative roles, including assistant private secretary, private secretary, and treasurer, and often accompanied Andrew during his tenure as the United Kingdom’s special trade envoy. During that time she handled travel arrangements, finances, and other official matters on his behalf. One detail drawing renewed attention is a £75 cheque she signed in 2000 from a Buckingham Palace account to pay a South African masseuse whose visit to Andrew was reportedly arranged by Ghislaine Maxwell. The woman who provided the massage later said the encounter at Buckingham Palace was awkward but not inappropriate, though the episode has become part of the broader scrutiny surrounding Andrew’s associations with Epstein. Manley has indicated that if authorities want information about that period, she would rather provide it directly to police than discuss it publicly.<br /><br /><br />The renewed attention to Manley’s role comes amid a broader investigation into Andrew’s conduct and his long-standing ties to Epstein, which have drawn increased scrutiny following newly released investigative materials and recent legal developments. Andrew was arrested earlier in 2026 on suspicion of misconduct in public office related to his activities while serving as trade envoy, though he denies wrongdoing and remains under investigation. Authorities are also examining financial arrangements and other aspects of his official activities during the period when Epstein was part of his social circle. Investigators are revisiting records, payments, and travel details connected to Andrew’s past engagements, and former staff members such as Manley may provide insight into how those activities were managed administratively. Her willingness to cooperate with police therefore represents another step in the ongoing effort by investigators to reconstruct the scope of Andrew’s dealings during the years when his relationship with Epstein was most active.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.thetimes.com/uk/royal-family/article/andrews-former-pa-will-speak-to-police-about-her-time-serving-royal-mv6vz02t2" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Andrew’s former PA will speak to police about her time serving royal</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>807</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Beneath Zorro Ranch: Whistleblower Raises Alarming Questions About What Lies Underground</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/beneath-zorro-ranch-whistleblower-raises-alarming-questions-about-what-lies-underground--72324207</link><description><![CDATA[A whistleblower has come forward alleging that disturbing ground formations resembling “grave-like plots” were identified on Jeffrey Epstein’s Zorro Ranch property in New Mexico, raising new questions about what may have taken place at the secluded estate. According to the claims, these markings were reportedly observed in aerial imagery and were significant enough to warrant closer scrutiny, yet it remains unclear whether a full forensic excavation was ever conducted. The ranch, long suspected of being a key location in Epstein’s network, has already been tied to allegations of abuse and trafficking, but these new assertions push the narrative into even darker territory—suggesting the possibility of physical evidence that was either overlooked or never properly investigated.<br /><br />The whistleblower further alleges that the FBI either failed to act decisively on this information or did not pursue the matter with the urgency it demanded, fueling criticism that federal authorities have consistently mishandled critical aspects of the Epstein case. This feeds into a broader pattern of scrutiny surrounding law enforcement’s response to Epstein over decades, where missed opportunities, limited transparency, and questionable investigative decisions have repeatedly come under fire. While the claims about the ranch have not been publicly verified through official findings, they intensify ongoing concerns about whether key evidence tied to Epstein’s activities remains undiscovered—or was never fully pursued in the first place.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/epstein-files-whistleblower-claims-grave-like-plots-were-spotted-zorro-ranch-fbi-faces-1786409" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein Files Whistleblower Claims 'Grave-Like Plots' Were Spotted at Zorro Ranch as FBI Faces Questions | IBTimes UK</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72324207</guid><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 00:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72324207/beneathzorroranch.mp3" length="10920481" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/81eedc73-237d-468d-9b81-190c76156fdb/81eedc73-237d-468d-9b81-190c76156fdb.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/81eedc73-237d-468d-9b81-190c76156fdb/81eedc73-237d-468d-9b81-190c76156fdb.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/81eedc73-237d-468d-9b81-190c76156fdb/81eedc73-237d-468d-9b81-190c76156fdb.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A whistleblower has come forward alleging that disturbing ground formations resembling “grave-like plots” were identified on Jeffrey Epstein’s Zorro Ranch property in New Mexico, raising new questions about what may have taken place at the secluded...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A whistleblower has come forward alleging that disturbing ground formations resembling “grave-like plots” were identified on Jeffrey Epstein’s Zorro Ranch property in New Mexico, raising new questions about what may have taken place at the secluded estate. According to the claims, these markings were reportedly observed in aerial imagery and were significant enough to warrant closer scrutiny, yet it remains unclear whether a full forensic excavation was ever conducted. The ranch, long suspected of being a key location in Epstein’s network, has already been tied to allegations of abuse and trafficking, but these new assertions push the narrative into even darker territory—suggesting the possibility of physical evidence that was either overlooked or never properly investigated.<br /><br />The whistleblower further alleges that the FBI either failed to act decisively on this information or did not pursue the matter with the urgency it demanded, fueling criticism that federal authorities have consistently mishandled critical aspects of the Epstein case. This feeds into a broader pattern of scrutiny surrounding law enforcement’s response to Epstein over decades, where missed opportunities, limited transparency, and questionable investigative decisions have repeatedly come under fire. While the claims about the ranch have not been publicly verified through official findings, they intensify ongoing concerns about whether key evidence tied to Epstein’s activities remains undiscovered—or was never fully pursued in the first place.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/epstein-files-whistleblower-claims-grave-like-plots-were-spotted-zorro-ranch-fbi-faces-1786409" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein Files Whistleblower Claims 'Grave-Like Plots' Were Spotted at Zorro Ranch as FBI Faces Questions | IBTimes UK</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>683</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Newly Surfaced Video Undermines  Timeline of Guard Activity on Night of Epstein’s Death</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/newly-surfaced-video-undermines-timeline-of-guard-activity-on-night-of-epstein-s-death--72324209</link><description><![CDATA[Newly released surveillance footage from the night of Jeffrey Epstein’s death shows correctional officers Tova Noel and Michael Thomas failing to carry out required security checks while stationed just feet from his cell. Instead of performing mandatory 30-minute rounds—particularly a critical 3 a.m. check—the guards were seen walking around, writing, and using a phone in the Special Housing Unit, despite clear instructions that Epstein required close monitoring after being taken off suicide watch.<br /><br />The footage adds to a broader pattern of failures that night. Epstein had been left alone after his cellmate was removed, despite orders that he should always have one, and additional bedding materials were left in his cell, which he later used in his death. Investigators previously found the guards falsified records to make it appear they conducted checks they actually skipped. While both were fired and charged, the case against them was later dropped, and the newly surfaced video is now intensifying scrutiny over what happened inside the facility that night.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://nypost.com/2026/03/21/us-news/new-video-shows-guards-milling-about-while-epstein-a-few-feet-away-in-his-cell-possibly-dead/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Exclusive | New video shows guards milling about while Epstein a few feet away in his cell, possibly dead</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72324209</guid><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72324209/videotovathomasnightofepsteindeath.mp3" length="11906865" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/aa83113c-e72f-4d28-babc-f99f03e50e67/aa83113c-e72f-4d28-babc-f99f03e50e67.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/aa83113c-e72f-4d28-babc-f99f03e50e67/aa83113c-e72f-4d28-babc-f99f03e50e67.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/aa83113c-e72f-4d28-babc-f99f03e50e67/aa83113c-e72f-4d28-babc-f99f03e50e67.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Newly released surveillance footage from the night of Jeffrey Epstein’s death shows correctional officers Tova Noel and Michael Thomas failing to carry out required security checks while stationed just feet from his cell. Instead of performing...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Newly released surveillance footage from the night of Jeffrey Epstein’s death shows correctional officers Tova Noel and Michael Thomas failing to carry out required security checks while stationed just feet from his cell. Instead of performing mandatory 30-minute rounds—particularly a critical 3 a.m. check—the guards were seen walking around, writing, and using a phone in the Special Housing Unit, despite clear instructions that Epstein required close monitoring after being taken off suicide watch.<br /><br />The footage adds to a broader pattern of failures that night. Epstein had been left alone after his cellmate was removed, despite orders that he should always have one, and additional bedding materials were left in his cell, which he later used in his death. Investigators previously found the guards falsified records to make it appear they conducted checks they actually skipped. While both were fired and charged, the case against them was later dropped, and the newly surfaced video is now intensifying scrutiny over what happened inside the facility that night.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://nypost.com/2026/03/21/us-news/new-video-shows-guards-milling-about-while-epstein-a-few-feet-away-in-his-cell-possibly-dead/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Exclusive | New video shows guards milling about while Epstein a few feet away in his cell, possibly dead</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>745</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Captain Of Security Operations At MCC And His OIG Deposition (Part 8) (6/5/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-captain-of-security-operations-at-mcc-and-his-oig-deposition-part-8-6-5-26--72348032</link><description><![CDATA[The document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s death. The captain described the command structure inside the jail, including his role supervising lieutenants and reporting up to associate wardens or the warden, while investigators walked him through staffing, rosters, post assignments, suicide-watch procedures, SHU operations, and the chain of responsibility on August 9–10, 2019. The transcript is important because it does not present Epstein’s death as a clean, orderly institutional event; instead, it shows a jail struggling with bad staffing, confusing handoffs, unfilled posts, questionable paperwork, and a command structure where critical responsibilities appear to have been either missed, misunderstood, or passed around.<br /><br /><br />The most serious value of the interview is in the irregularities it surfaces. The captain reportedly discussed inaccurate rosters or logs, acknowledged questions around skipped SHU rounds, addressed the fact that Epstein had previously been on suicide watch, and said he would not necessarily have known in real time if officers were failing to conduct required checks. Even more troubling, he expressed concern that certain documents may have been deliberately removed from files that should have been reviewed or audited, and investigators also raised an inmate-count issue involving an inmate named Reyes, whose release may not have been properly reflected in the institution’s count — something the captain treated as a protocol violation. Taken together, the transcript adds another layer to the larger Epstein death record: not a single clean explanation, but a bureaucratic mess of missing or questionable documentation, staffing failures, broken supervision, and institutional chaos at precisely the moment when the most high-profile federal inmate in America was supposed to be under careful control.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00111830.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00111830.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72348032</guid><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72348032/dardenoig8.mp3" length="14692563" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d0e706f7-1c89-4976-8d86-fe884509ae11/d0e706f7-1c89-4976-8d86-fe884509ae11.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d0e706f7-1c89-4976-8d86-fe884509ae11/d0e706f7-1c89-4976-8d86-fe884509ae11.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d0e706f7-1c89-4976-8d86-fe884509ae11/d0e706f7-1c89-4976-8d86-fe884509ae11.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s death. The captain described the command...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s death. The captain described the command structure inside the jail, including his role supervising lieutenants and reporting up to associate wardens or the warden, while investigators walked him through staffing, rosters, post assignments, suicide-watch procedures, SHU operations, and the chain of responsibility on August 9–10, 2019. The transcript is important because it does not present Epstein’s death as a clean, orderly institutional event; instead, it shows a jail struggling with bad staffing, confusing handoffs, unfilled posts, questionable paperwork, and a command structure where critical responsibilities appear to have been either missed, misunderstood, or passed around.<br /><br /><br />The most serious value of the interview is in the irregularities it surfaces. The captain reportedly discussed inaccurate rosters or logs, acknowledged questions around skipped SHU rounds, addressed the fact that Epstein had previously been on suicide watch, and said he would not necessarily have known in real time if officers were failing to conduct required checks. Even more troubling, he expressed concern that certain documents may have been deliberately removed from files that should have been reviewed or audited, and investigators also raised an inmate-count issue involving an inmate named Reyes, whose release may not have been properly reflected in the institution’s count — something the captain treated as a protocol violation. Taken together, the transcript adds another layer to the larger Epstein death record: not a single clean explanation, but a bureaucratic mess of missing or questionable documentation, staffing failures, broken supervision, and institutional chaos at precisely the moment when the most high-profile federal inmate in America was supposed to be under careful control.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00111830.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00111830.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>919</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Jes Staley Admission and the Hard Questions Around Epstein’s Assistants (6/5/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-jes-staley-admission-and-the-hard-questions-around-epstein-s-assistants-6-5-26--72348029</link><description><![CDATA[Jes Staley’s admission that he had what he described as consensual sexual relations with one of Jeffrey Epstein’s assistants seriously undermines the narrative that Epstein’s trafficking operation had no outside beneficiaries. The issue is not simply whether Staley used the word “consensual,” but whether that woman was operating inside Epstein’s larger ecosystem of coercion, dependency, employment pressure, secrecy, and abuse. Epstein’s world was not a neutral social environment; it was a controlled system where staff, assistants, young women, powerful visitors, money, housing, and access all overlapped. If at least one assistant was abused or controlled by Epstein, then sexual access to someone in that role cannot be dismissed as an ordinary private encounter without asking whether Epstein’s power shaped the circumstances. Staley has not been convicted of trafficking and the full legal record still requires precision, but his admission creates a factual anchor that makes the old “Epstein never trafficked anyone to anyone else” defense look increasingly hollow.<br /><br />The broader point is that Epstein’s operation survived because powerful people and institutions repeatedly separated individual incidents from the machinery that produced them. “Consensual,” “no client list,” “no charges filed,” and “professional relationship” have all been used to narrow the public’s view of a scandal built around access, control, and institutional protection. Staley’s connection to Epstein was not a meaningless brush with a disgraced financier; it involved a relationship serious enough to draw regulatory scrutiny, and his admitted encounter with an Epstein assistant raises direct questions about whether Epstein’s financial, social, and sexual worlds were intertwined. Any serious investigation should ask when the encounter occurred, how it was arranged, what Epstein knew, whether the woman was dependent on or controlled by Epstein, and whether other powerful associates were given similar access. The admission does not prove every allegation, but it does shatter the comfortable claim that there is no public basis for asking whether Epstein’s powerful associates sexually benefited from the system he built.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72348029</guid><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 18:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72348029/staleyadmitsrelationsepsteinassistant.mp3" length="19262528" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a19a6f80-38e2-4a9d-ac57-06619581ba29/a19a6f80-38e2-4a9d-ac57-06619581ba29.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a19a6f80-38e2-4a9d-ac57-06619581ba29/a19a6f80-38e2-4a9d-ac57-06619581ba29.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a19a6f80-38e2-4a9d-ac57-06619581ba29/a19a6f80-38e2-4a9d-ac57-06619581ba29.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jes Staley’s admission that he had what he described as consensual sexual relations with one of Jeffrey Epstein’s assistants seriously undermines the narrative that Epstein’s trafficking operation had no outside beneficiaries. The issue is not simply...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jes Staley’s admission that he had what he described as consensual sexual relations with one of Jeffrey Epstein’s assistants seriously undermines the narrative that Epstein’s trafficking operation had no outside beneficiaries. The issue is not simply whether Staley used the word “consensual,” but whether that woman was operating inside Epstein’s larger ecosystem of coercion, dependency, employment pressure, secrecy, and abuse. Epstein’s world was not a neutral social environment; it was a controlled system where staff, assistants, young women, powerful visitors, money, housing, and access all overlapped. If at least one assistant was abused or controlled by Epstein, then sexual access to someone in that role cannot be dismissed as an ordinary private encounter without asking whether Epstein’s power shaped the circumstances. Staley has not been convicted of trafficking and the full legal record still requires precision, but his admission creates a factual anchor that makes the old “Epstein never trafficked anyone to anyone else” defense look increasingly hollow.<br /><br />The broader point is that Epstein’s operation survived because powerful people and institutions repeatedly separated individual incidents from the machinery that produced them. “Consensual,” “no client list,” “no charges filed,” and “professional relationship” have all been used to narrow the public’s view of a scandal built around access, control, and institutional protection. Staley’s connection to Epstein was not a meaningless brush with a disgraced financier; it involved a relationship serious enough to draw regulatory scrutiny, and his admitted encounter with an Epstein assistant raises direct questions about whether Epstein’s financial, social, and sexual worlds were intertwined. Any serious investigation should ask when the encounter occurred, how it was arranged, what Epstein knew, whether the woman was dependent on or controlled by Epstein, and whether other powerful associates were given similar access. The admission does not prove every allegation, but it does shatter the comfortable claim that there is no public basis for asking whether Epstein’s powerful associates sexually benefited from the system he built.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1204</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>A Senate Hearing Turns Combative Over Epstein’s Finances (6/5/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/a-senate-hearing-turns-combative-over-epstein-s-finances-6-5-26--72348026</link><description><![CDATA[Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent opened a Senate Finance Committee hearing by going directly after Sen. Ron Wyden, accusing him of attacking the Treasury Department over Epstein-related financial records while ignoring his own son’s past contact with Jeffrey Epstein. Bessent pointed to Adam Wyden’s 2016 meeting at Epstein’s Manhattan mansion, where Wyden reportedly sought backing for his hedge fund, and referenced an email included in released DOJ files. The confrontation came as Wyden has continued pressing Treasury over Epstein’s suspicious financial activity reports and broader money trail, arguing that the department is withholding material that could shed light on Epstein’s network.<br /><br />Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent opened a Senate Finance Committee hearing by going directly after Sen. Ron Wyden, accusing him of attacking the Treasury Department over Epstein-related financial records while ignoring his own son’s past contact with Jeffrey Epstein. Bessent pointed to Adam Wyden’s 2016 meeting at Epstein’s Manhattan mansion, where Wyden reportedly sought backing for his hedge fund, and referenced an email included in released DOJ files. The confrontation came as Wyden has continued pressing Treasury over Epstein’s suspicious financial activity reports and broader money trail, arguing that the department is withholding material that could shed light on Epstein’s network.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://nypost.com/2026/06/03/us-news/scott-bessent-goes-scorched-earth-against-sen-ron-wyden-over-epstein-claims/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Scott Bessent goes scorched earth against Sen. Ron Wyden over Epstein claims</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72348026</guid><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72348026/bessentwydensenatebarbs.mp3" length="12729826" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8f9c2f85-50be-43bb-853b-9cf4c54deb6f/8f9c2f85-50be-43bb-853b-9cf4c54deb6f.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8f9c2f85-50be-43bb-853b-9cf4c54deb6f/8f9c2f85-50be-43bb-853b-9cf4c54deb6f.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8f9c2f85-50be-43bb-853b-9cf4c54deb6f/8f9c2f85-50be-43bb-853b-9cf4c54deb6f.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent opened a Senate Finance Committee hearing by going directly after Sen. Ron Wyden, accusing him of attacking the Treasury Department over Epstein-related financial records while ignoring his own son’s past contact with...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent opened a Senate Finance Committee hearing by going directly after Sen. Ron Wyden, accusing him of attacking the Treasury Department over Epstein-related financial records while ignoring his own son’s past contact with Jeffrey Epstein. Bessent pointed to Adam Wyden’s 2016 meeting at Epstein’s Manhattan mansion, where Wyden reportedly sought backing for his hedge fund, and referenced an email included in released DOJ files. The confrontation came as Wyden has continued pressing Treasury over Epstein’s suspicious financial activity reports and broader money trail, arguing that the department is withholding material that could shed light on Epstein’s network.<br /><br />Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent opened a Senate Finance Committee hearing by going directly after Sen. Ron Wyden, accusing him of attacking the Treasury Department over Epstein-related financial records while ignoring his own son’s past contact with Jeffrey Epstein. Bessent pointed to Adam Wyden’s 2016 meeting at Epstein’s Manhattan mansion, where Wyden reportedly sought backing for his hedge fund, and referenced an email included in released DOJ files. The confrontation came as Wyden has continued pressing Treasury over Epstein’s suspicious financial activity reports and broader money trail, arguing that the department is withholding material that could shed light on Epstein’s network.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://nypost.com/2026/06/03/us-news/scott-bessent-goes-scorched-earth-against-sen-ron-wyden-over-epstein-claims/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Scott Bessent goes scorched earth against Sen. Ron Wyden over Epstein claims</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>796</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor Faces New Scrutiny Over Royal Ascot Allegation (6/5/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/andrew-mountbatten-windsor-faces-new-scrutiny-over-royal-ascot-allegation-6-5-26--72348023</link><description><![CDATA[Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor is reportedly facing another layer of police scrutiny, this time over an alleged incident involving a woman at Royal Ascot in 2002. Thames Valley Police are said to be examining that episode as part of a broader look at possible misconduct involving Andrew, including potential sexual misconduct, corruption, and fraud. The alleged incident took place during the high-profile racing festival, where senior royals were present, including Queen Elizabeth II, then-Prince Charles, Prince Edward, and Princess Beatrice. Details remain limited, but one royal commentator cited in the coverage said the woman involved was allegedly a waitress at the event, while Buckingham Palace has maintained that it no longer speaks for Andrew because he is no longer a working royal.<br /><br />The Royal Ascot claim comes as Andrew is already under wider investigative pressure connected to allegations tied to Jeffrey Epstein and alleged sex crimes at royal properties. Thames Valley Police previously said a man in his sixties from Norfolk had been arrested on February 19, 2026, on suspicion of misconduct in public office, interviewed under caution, and released under investigation while searches were carried out at addresses in Berkshire and Norfolk. Police also said they were working with the U.S. Department of Justice and the Crown Prosecution Service as part of what they described as a serious, complex, and sensitive investigation. The broader picture is that Andrew’s Epstein-related disgrace is no longer just a reputational collapse or royal family embarrassment; it is now being framed through active police inquiries, potential witnesses, and questions about whether misconduct extended into royal spaces that were once shielded by status, protocol, and institutional silence.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/former-prince-andrew-investigation-alleged-inappropriate-conduct-woman-royal-ascot" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Former Prince Andrew reportedly faces new probe over 2002 Royal Ascot incident | Fox News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72348023</guid><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72348023/andrewascot.mp3" length="10658421" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f6aa8d01-58dd-4f1a-95b1-4f96ff64f452/f6aa8d01-58dd-4f1a-95b1-4f96ff64f452.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f6aa8d01-58dd-4f1a-95b1-4f96ff64f452/f6aa8d01-58dd-4f1a-95b1-4f96ff64f452.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f6aa8d01-58dd-4f1a-95b1-4f96ff64f452/f6aa8d01-58dd-4f1a-95b1-4f96ff64f452.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor is reportedly facing another layer of police scrutiny, this time over an alleged incident involving a woman at Royal Ascot in 2002. Thames Valley Police are said to be examining that episode as part of a broader look at...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor is reportedly facing another layer of police scrutiny, this time over an alleged incident involving a woman at Royal Ascot in 2002. Thames Valley Police are said to be examining that episode as part of a broader look at possible misconduct involving Andrew, including potential sexual misconduct, corruption, and fraud. The alleged incident took place during the high-profile racing festival, where senior royals were present, including Queen Elizabeth II, then-Prince Charles, Prince Edward, and Princess Beatrice. Details remain limited, but one royal commentator cited in the coverage said the woman involved was allegedly a waitress at the event, while Buckingham Palace has maintained that it no longer speaks for Andrew because he is no longer a working royal.<br /><br />The Royal Ascot claim comes as Andrew is already under wider investigative pressure connected to allegations tied to Jeffrey Epstein and alleged sex crimes at royal properties. Thames Valley Police previously said a man in his sixties from Norfolk had been arrested on February 19, 2026, on suspicion of misconduct in public office, interviewed under caution, and released under investigation while searches were carried out at addresses in Berkshire and Norfolk. Police also said they were working with the U.S. Department of Justice and the Crown Prosecution Service as part of what they described as a serious, complex, and sensitive investigation. The broader picture is that Andrew’s Epstein-related disgrace is no longer just a reputational collapse or royal family embarrassment; it is now being framed through active police inquiries, potential witnesses, and questions about whether misconduct extended into royal spaces that were once shielded by status, protocol, and institutional silence.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/former-prince-andrew-investigation-alleged-inappropriate-conduct-woman-royal-ascot" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Former Prince Andrew reportedly faces new probe over 2002 Royal Ascot incident | Fox News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>667</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>New Mexico Subpoenas Federal Agencies Including The FBI And DOJ in Epstein Ranch Inquiry (6/5/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/new-mexico-subpoenas-federal-agencies-including-the-fbi-and-doj-in-epstein-ranch-inquiry-6-5-26--72348028</link><description><![CDATA[New Mexico’s Epstein Truth Commission has approved subpoenas for 14 entities as it digs into alleged sex trafficking, abuse, and institutional failures connected to Jeffrey Epstein’s former Zorro Ranch outside Santa Fe. The entities reportedly include the FBI, the DOJ, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York, the New Mexico Department of Justice, JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank, and the Santa Fe Institute. Lawmakers say the goal is to build a documented public record of what happened in New Mexico, who knew what, and whether federal, state, financial, or institutional actors failed to act while Epstein maintained the ranch for decades.<br /><br />The renewed scrutiny follows years of unanswered questions about why Epstein’s New Mexico property was never fully searched during earlier federal investigations, despite survivor allegations and later claims tied to newly released files. Testimony before the commission included alleged victim Rachel Benavidez, who said Epstein abused her after she was hired as a massage therapist at the ranch, along with relatives of survivors. The commission’s work is now positioned as both a fact-finding effort and a possible precursor to civil litigation, with New Mexico officials framing the inquiry as a survivor-centered attempt to finally examine the ranch, the money trail, and the institutional blind spots that allowed Epstein’s operation to remain largely untouched there for so long.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.latintimes.com/fbi-doj-among-agencies-facing-scrutiny-new-mexico-reopens-questions-around-epstein-ranch-597716#goog_rewarded" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">FBI, DOJ Among Agencies Facing Scrutiny as New Mexico Reopens Questions Around Epstein Ranch</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72348028</guid><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72348028/nmtruthcomissionsubsfbidoj.mp3" length="10131374" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/19e1f574-c820-4a95-b20f-7ddf485b2fc3/19e1f574-c820-4a95-b20f-7ddf485b2fc3.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/19e1f574-c820-4a95-b20f-7ddf485b2fc3/19e1f574-c820-4a95-b20f-7ddf485b2fc3.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/19e1f574-c820-4a95-b20f-7ddf485b2fc3/19e1f574-c820-4a95-b20f-7ddf485b2fc3.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>New Mexico’s Epstein Truth Commission has approved subpoenas for 14 entities as it digs into alleged sex trafficking, abuse, and institutional failures connected to Jeffrey Epstein’s former Zorro Ranch outside Santa Fe. The entities reportedly include...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[New Mexico’s Epstein Truth Commission has approved subpoenas for 14 entities as it digs into alleged sex trafficking, abuse, and institutional failures connected to Jeffrey Epstein’s former Zorro Ranch outside Santa Fe. The entities reportedly include the FBI, the DOJ, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York, the New Mexico Department of Justice, JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank, and the Santa Fe Institute. Lawmakers say the goal is to build a documented public record of what happened in New Mexico, who knew what, and whether federal, state, financial, or institutional actors failed to act while Epstein maintained the ranch for decades.<br /><br />The renewed scrutiny follows years of unanswered questions about why Epstein’s New Mexico property was never fully searched during earlier federal investigations, despite survivor allegations and later claims tied to newly released files. Testimony before the commission included alleged victim Rachel Benavidez, who said Epstein abused her after she was hired as a massage therapist at the ranch, along with relatives of survivors. The commission’s work is now positioned as both a fact-finding effort and a possible precursor to civil litigation, with New Mexico officials framing the inquiry as a survivor-centered attempt to finally examine the ranch, the money trail, and the institutional blind spots that allowed Epstein’s operation to remain largely untouched there for so long.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.latintimes.com/fbi-doj-among-agencies-facing-scrutiny-new-mexico-reopens-questions-around-epstein-ranch-597716#goog_rewarded" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">FBI, DOJ Among Agencies Facing Scrutiny as New Mexico Reopens Questions Around Epstein Ranch</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>634</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Jeffrey Epstein And The Many Mysterious Deaths Around Him (6/5/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-the-many-mysterious-deaths-around-him-6-5-26--72346790</link><description><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein’s death inside a Manhattan jail cell in 2019 ignited a chain of suspicion that has never faded, morphing into a narrative where suicide is never just suicide. From Epstein himself to Jean-Luc Brunel in Paris, to former White House aide Mark Middleton in Arkansas, to Deutsche Bank executives and even Ghislaine Maxwell’s father decades earlier, each sudden death has been folded into a larger pattern. Official rulings of suicide or accident are met with disbelief, because the timing always feels too convenient, the circumstances too strange, and the institutions overseeing these figures too compromised.<br /><br />Together, these deaths form more than a morbid list—they’ve become symbols of systemic failure. Each one robs survivors of testimony, erases potential evidence, and reinforces the belief that the powerful never face full accountability. Whether by incompetence, coincidence, or conspiracy, the effect is the same: witnesses vanish, truth is buried, and public trust corrodes. In the shadow of Epstein, bizarre suicides are no longer personal tragedies—they are the story itself, a grim reminder that justice often dies before it can be delivered.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72346790</guid><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72346790/megaepsteinledgerdeath.mp3" length="48371296" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0edf227c-3988-4605-8aa2-44786847a35a/0edf227c-3988-4605-8aa2-44786847a35a.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0edf227c-3988-4605-8aa2-44786847a35a/0edf227c-3988-4605-8aa2-44786847a35a.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0edf227c-3988-4605-8aa2-44786847a35a/0edf227c-3988-4605-8aa2-44786847a35a.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jeffrey Epstein’s death inside a Manhattan jail cell in 2019 ignited a chain of suspicion that has never faded, morphing into a narrative where suicide is never just suicide. From Epstein himself to Jean-Luc Brunel in Paris, to former White House aide...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein’s death inside a Manhattan jail cell in 2019 ignited a chain of suspicion that has never faded, morphing into a narrative where suicide is never just suicide. From Epstein himself to Jean-Luc Brunel in Paris, to former White House aide Mark Middleton in Arkansas, to Deutsche Bank executives and even Ghislaine Maxwell’s father decades earlier, each sudden death has been folded into a larger pattern. Official rulings of suicide or accident are met with disbelief, because the timing always feels too convenient, the circumstances too strange, and the institutions overseeing these figures too compromised.<br /><br />Together, these deaths form more than a morbid list—they’ve become symbols of systemic failure. Each one robs survivors of testimony, erases potential evidence, and reinforces the belief that the powerful never face full accountability. Whether by incompetence, coincidence, or conspiracy, the effect is the same: witnesses vanish, truth is buried, and public trust corrodes. In the shadow of Epstein, bizarre suicides are no longer personal tragedies—they are the story itself, a grim reminder that justice often dies before it can be delivered.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3024</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The Psychological Reconstruction Of The Events Leading To The Death of Epstein (6/5/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-psychological-reconstruction-of-the-events-leading-to-the-death-of-epstein-6-5-26--72346791</link><description><![CDATA[In the memorandum responding to the psychological reconstruction of inmate Jeffrey Epstein dated September 17, 2019, MCC New York Warden J. Petrucci addressed findings related to Epstein’s mental state and the events leading up to his death while housed in the Special Housing Unit. The response reviewed Epstein’s custody status, the decision to remove him from suicide watch, and the psychological assessments conducted by staff prior to his death. According to the institutional response, medical and psychological personnel had evaluated Epstein after an earlier incident in July 2019 and later determined that he did not meet the criteria to remain on suicide watch. Instead, he was placed under psychological observation, which carried fewer monitoring requirements than full suicide watch. The memorandum emphasized that clinical staff believed Epstein was stable enough to be removed from the more restrictive monitoring status and that the decision was based on the professional judgment of mental health personnel following their evaluation.<br /><br />Petrucci’s response also addressed operational procedures within the Special Housing Unit and how those procedures were supposed to function during Epstein’s detention. The memorandum stated that once Epstein was removed from suicide watch, responsibility for routine monitoring shifted back to standard correctional procedures, including regular counts and welfare checks conducted by correctional officers. The response acknowledged that those required checks were not properly carried out during the overnight shift preceding Epstein’s death and that logbook entries later proved to be inaccurate. While the psychological reconstruction attempted to analyze Epstein’s mental condition and possible motivations, the institutional response focused on clarifying the decisions made by staff and explaining the custody status under which Epstein was being housed at the time. The memorandum ultimately framed the removal from suicide watch as a clinical decision made by mental health professionals, while noting that subsequent failures in required monitoring procedures occurred during the final hours before Epstein was found unresponsive in his cell.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00048963.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00048963.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72346791</guid><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72346791/megapsychologicalreconstruction.mp3" length="55395100" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ac8c5a1b-996e-439d-808b-63ecffd31e1f/ac8c5a1b-996e-439d-808b-63ecffd31e1f.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ac8c5a1b-996e-439d-808b-63ecffd31e1f/ac8c5a1b-996e-439d-808b-63ecffd31e1f.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ac8c5a1b-996e-439d-808b-63ecffd31e1f/ac8c5a1b-996e-439d-808b-63ecffd31e1f.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In the memorandum responding to the psychological reconstruction of inmate Jeffrey Epstein dated September 17, 2019, MCC New York Warden J. Petrucci addressed findings related to Epstein’s mental state and the events leading up to his death while...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In the memorandum responding to the psychological reconstruction of inmate Jeffrey Epstein dated September 17, 2019, MCC New York Warden J. Petrucci addressed findings related to Epstein’s mental state and the events leading up to his death while housed in the Special Housing Unit. The response reviewed Epstein’s custody status, the decision to remove him from suicide watch, and the psychological assessments conducted by staff prior to his death. According to the institutional response, medical and psychological personnel had evaluated Epstein after an earlier incident in July 2019 and later determined that he did not meet the criteria to remain on suicide watch. Instead, he was placed under psychological observation, which carried fewer monitoring requirements than full suicide watch. The memorandum emphasized that clinical staff believed Epstein was stable enough to be removed from the more restrictive monitoring status and that the decision was based on the professional judgment of mental health personnel following their evaluation.<br /><br />Petrucci’s response also addressed operational procedures within the Special Housing Unit and how those procedures were supposed to function during Epstein’s detention. The memorandum stated that once Epstein was removed from suicide watch, responsibility for routine monitoring shifted back to standard correctional procedures, including regular counts and welfare checks conducted by correctional officers. The response acknowledged that those required checks were not properly carried out during the overnight shift preceding Epstein’s death and that logbook entries later proved to be inaccurate. While the psychological reconstruction attempted to analyze Epstein’s mental condition and possible motivations, the institutional response focused on clarifying the decisions made by staff and explaining the custody status under which Epstein was being housed at the time. The memorandum ultimately framed the removal from suicide watch as a clinical decision made by mental health professionals, while noting that subsequent failures in required monitoring procedures occurred during the final hours before Epstein was found unresponsive in his cell.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00048963.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00048963.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3463</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   Les Wexner And The Epstein Related Q&amp;A Session With Congress (6/5/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-les-wexner-and-the-epstein-related-q-a-session-with-congress-6-5-26--72346789</link><description><![CDATA[Les Wexner’s Epstein-related deposition landed less like a breakthrough and more like another controlled pass through already familiar terrain: Wexner said Epstein conned him, denied knowing anything about Epstein’s sex trafficking, denied participating in abuse, and tried to frame the relationship as professional rather than personal. He described Epstein as a family-office figure who managed parts of his financial life, claimed Epstein stole from him, said he never saw warning signs, and insisted that after Epstein’s 2008 guilty plea, Epstein was essentially “dead” to him. The questioning did force Wexner to address uncomfortable details — the birthday-book message signed “your friend Leslie,” photos of him with Epstein, a visit to Epstein’s island, Epstein’s role around New Albany, and the question of how much money Epstein may have taken — but Wexner’s answers largely stayed inside the same defensive box: he was deceived, he did not know, he does not remember, and Epstein was a criminal predator whose full operation escaped him.<br /><br />The problem is that the process did not appear to substantially move the ball. It produced optics, denials, memory gaps, and a few headline-friendly moments, but very little that fundamentally changed the public record. The public already knew Wexner was one of Epstein’s most important early patrons, that Epstein had unusual access to his money and world, that the relationship helped give Epstein social credibility, and that Wexner has long claimed he was betrayed and financially exploited. What the deposition added was texture, not revelation: Wexner’s own tone, his repeated distancing, his admission about the birthday note, his “con man” framing, and his inability or unwillingness to nail down key specifics. In that sense, the interview reinforced the larger frustration with the Epstein inquiry machine: powerful people are questioned, transcripts and videos are released, everyone gets a day of headlines, but the public still comes away with the same core unanswered questions about who enabled Epstein, who protected him, who benefited from him, and why the system let him operate for so long.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72346789</guid><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72346789/megawexnerandthecongressionalinterview.mp3" length="57670052" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/41f5e87e-f400-4eb3-a25c-08af78c0e3fb/41f5e87e-f400-4eb3-a25c-08af78c0e3fb.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/41f5e87e-f400-4eb3-a25c-08af78c0e3fb/41f5e87e-f400-4eb3-a25c-08af78c0e3fb.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/41f5e87e-f400-4eb3-a25c-08af78c0e3fb/41f5e87e-f400-4eb3-a25c-08af78c0e3fb.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Les Wexner’s Epstein-related deposition landed less like a breakthrough and more like another controlled pass through already familiar terrain: Wexner said Epstein conned him, denied knowing anything about Epstein’s sex trafficking, denied...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Les Wexner’s Epstein-related deposition landed less like a breakthrough and more like another controlled pass through already familiar terrain: Wexner said Epstein conned him, denied knowing anything about Epstein’s sex trafficking, denied participating in abuse, and tried to frame the relationship as professional rather than personal. He described Epstein as a family-office figure who managed parts of his financial life, claimed Epstein stole from him, said he never saw warning signs, and insisted that after Epstein’s 2008 guilty plea, Epstein was essentially “dead” to him. The questioning did force Wexner to address uncomfortable details — the birthday-book message signed “your friend Leslie,” photos of him with Epstein, a visit to Epstein’s island, Epstein’s role around New Albany, and the question of how much money Epstein may have taken — but Wexner’s answers largely stayed inside the same defensive box: he was deceived, he did not know, he does not remember, and Epstein was a criminal predator whose full operation escaped him.<br /><br />The problem is that the process did not appear to substantially move the ball. It produced optics, denials, memory gaps, and a few headline-friendly moments, but very little that fundamentally changed the public record. The public already knew Wexner was one of Epstein’s most important early patrons, that Epstein had unusual access to his money and world, that the relationship helped give Epstein social credibility, and that Wexner has long claimed he was betrayed and financially exploited. What the deposition added was texture, not revelation: Wexner’s own tone, his repeated distancing, his admission about the birthday note, his “con man” framing, and his inability or unwillingness to nail down key specifics. In that sense, the interview reinforced the larger frustration with the Epstein inquiry machine: powerful people are questioned, transcripts and videos are released, everyone gets a day of headlines, but the public still comes away with the same core unanswered questions about who enabled Epstein, who protected him, who benefited from him, and why the system let him operate for so long.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3605</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>DOJ Under Fire: Todd Blanche Defends Epstein Files Release Amid Mounting Scrutiny</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/doj-under-fire-todd-blanche-defends-epstein-files-release-amid-mounting-scrutiny--72324202</link><description><![CDATA[Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche publicly defended the Justice Department’s handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files, insisting that the department has complied with legal requirements to release materials tied to the case. He stated that investigators have already disclosed all documents that can be made public under the law, while maintaining that Epstein’s death in federal custody was ruled a suicide despite acknowledged procedural failures at the jail. Blanche also indicated that while the case is technically still open, any additional charges or actions would depend on the emergence of new, substantiated evidence rather than speculation or public pressure.<br /><br /><br />At the same time, the situation is drawing increasing criticism from lawmakers and observers who argue that the disclosures have been incomplete, overly redacted, and lacking transparency about Epstein’s broader network. Some members of Congress and outside critics suggest that key information may still be withheld, fueling suspicions about the extent of institutional accountability. Blanche pushed back on those claims, arguing that legal constraints—such as protecting victims and avoiding the release of unverified allegations—limit what can be made public. The clash reflects a widening gap between official assurances that the matter has been handled appropriately and ongoing demands for deeper disclosure and accountability.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.cnn.com/2026/03/18/politics/todd-blanche-doj-jeffrey-epstein-files" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Deputy AG Blanche defends DOJ’s work on Epstein case ahead of closed-door Hill briefing | CNN Politics</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72324202</guid><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72324202/blanchedefends.mp3" length="13648919" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/06d5e534-a16e-4a5a-9824-ccf2fa01d723/06d5e534-a16e-4a5a-9824-ccf2fa01d723.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/06d5e534-a16e-4a5a-9824-ccf2fa01d723/06d5e534-a16e-4a5a-9824-ccf2fa01d723.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/06d5e534-a16e-4a5a-9824-ccf2fa01d723/06d5e534-a16e-4a5a-9824-ccf2fa01d723.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche publicly defended the Justice Department’s handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files, insisting that the department has complied with legal requirements to release materials tied to the case. He stated that...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche publicly defended the Justice Department’s handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files, insisting that the department has complied with legal requirements to release materials tied to the case. He stated that investigators have already disclosed all documents that can be made public under the law, while maintaining that Epstein’s death in federal custody was ruled a suicide despite acknowledged procedural failures at the jail. Blanche also indicated that while the case is technically still open, any additional charges or actions would depend on the emergence of new, substantiated evidence rather than speculation or public pressure.<br /><br /><br />At the same time, the situation is drawing increasing criticism from lawmakers and observers who argue that the disclosures have been incomplete, overly redacted, and lacking transparency about Epstein’s broader network. Some members of Congress and outside critics suggest that key information may still be withheld, fueling suspicions about the extent of institutional accountability. Blanche pushed back on those claims, arguing that legal constraints—such as protecting victims and avoiding the release of unverified allegations—limit what can be made public. The clash reflects a widening gap between official assurances that the matter has been handled appropriately and ongoing demands for deeper disclosure and accountability.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.cnn.com/2026/03/18/politics/todd-blanche-doj-jeffrey-epstein-files" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Deputy AG Blanche defends DOJ’s work on Epstein case ahead of closed-door Hill briefing | CNN Politics</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>854</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Epstein Shadow Over Bill Gates’ Philanthropic Empire Sparks Billionaire Revolt</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-epstein-shadow-over-bill-gates-philanthropic-empire-sparks-billionaire-revolt--72324200</link><description><![CDATA[The Giving Pledge—founded by Bill Gates, Melinda French Gates, and Warren Buffett—is facing growing backlash as several high-profile billionaires distance themselves from the initiative amid renewed scrutiny over Gates’ past association with Jeffrey Epstein. Critics, including Peter Thiel, have mocked the pledge as “Epstein-adjacent,” arguing that Gates’ ties to Epstein have tainted the philanthropic effort and damaged its credibility. Some prominent figures, such as Brian Armstrong, have already stepped away, while others have reportedly reconsidered their involvement, viewing the initiative as politically driven and increasingly controversial.<br /><br /><br />Beyond the Epstein-related criticism, the pledge is also under fire for lacking accountability and enforcement, since participants are not legally required to follow through on their commitments and can delay donations for decades. Critics argue that much of the pledged wealth sits in foundations or donor-advised funds rather than reaching active charities, raising questions about the program’s real-world impact. While defenders of the pledge point to its global reach and hundreds of signatories, even insiders—including Melinda French Gates—have acknowledged that progress has been uneven and has fallen short of initial expectations.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://nypost.com/2026/03/16/business/billionaires-bolt-from-bill-gates-scandal-scarred-giving-pledge-as-critics-brand-it-epstein-adjacent/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Billionaires bolt from Bill Gates' scandal-scarred Giving Pledge as critics brand it 'Epstein-adjacent'</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72324200</guid><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72324200/billgatescharityexodus.mp3" length="16664494" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/bcc21316-834c-4807-a9e4-80c380ed293e/bcc21316-834c-4807-a9e4-80c380ed293e.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/bcc21316-834c-4807-a9e4-80c380ed293e/bcc21316-834c-4807-a9e4-80c380ed293e.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/bcc21316-834c-4807-a9e4-80c380ed293e/bcc21316-834c-4807-a9e4-80c380ed293e.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Giving Pledge—founded by Bill Gates, Melinda French Gates, and Warren Buffett—is facing growing backlash as several high-profile billionaires distance themselves from the initiative amid renewed scrutiny over Gates’ past association with Jeffrey...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Giving Pledge—founded by Bill Gates, Melinda French Gates, and Warren Buffett—is facing growing backlash as several high-profile billionaires distance themselves from the initiative amid renewed scrutiny over Gates’ past association with Jeffrey Epstein. Critics, including Peter Thiel, have mocked the pledge as “Epstein-adjacent,” arguing that Gates’ ties to Epstein have tainted the philanthropic effort and damaged its credibility. Some prominent figures, such as Brian Armstrong, have already stepped away, while others have reportedly reconsidered their involvement, viewing the initiative as politically driven and increasingly controversial.<br /><br /><br />Beyond the Epstein-related criticism, the pledge is also under fire for lacking accountability and enforcement, since participants are not legally required to follow through on their commitments and can delay donations for decades. Critics argue that much of the pledged wealth sits in foundations or donor-advised funds rather than reaching active charities, raising questions about the program’s real-world impact. While defenders of the pledge point to its global reach and hundreds of signatories, even insiders—including Melinda French Gates—have acknowledged that progress has been uneven and has fallen short of initial expectations.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://nypost.com/2026/03/16/business/billionaires-bolt-from-bill-gates-scandal-scarred-giving-pledge-as-critics-brand-it-epstein-adjacent/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Billionaires bolt from Bill Gates' scandal-scarred Giving Pledge as critics brand it 'Epstein-adjacent'</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1042</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Congress Targets Epstein’s Financial Network as Richard Kahn Faces House Deposition</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/congress-targets-epstein-s-financial-network-as-richard-kahn-faces-house-deposition--72324197</link><description><![CDATA[The House Oversight Committee is preparing to depose Richard Kahn, Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime accountant, as part of its expanding congressional investigation into how Epstein managed and protected his wealth while allegedly operating a years-long sex-trafficking network. Kahn worked for Epstein for more than a decade and helped oversee the financier’s complex financial structure, including trusts, shell entities, and other mechanisms that managed Epstein’s multimillion-dollar fortune. Lawmakers believe questioning Kahn could provide insight into how Epstein funded his operations, moved money through various accounts, and maintained financial secrecy while facing mounting allegations of abuse. The committee has indicated that Kahn’s knowledge of Epstein’s financial infrastructure may help clarify whether money flows or financial arrangements enabled or concealed the broader trafficking enterprise.<br /><br />The deposition is part of a broader congressional effort to map Epstein’s network of associates, advisers, and financial managers who may have played roles in his personal and business affairs. Kahn, along with Epstein’s longtime attorney Darren Indyke, previously served as co-executors of Epstein’s estate after his death in 2019 and has faced civil lawsuits from victims alleging they helped facilitate or conceal Epstein’s illegal activities, accusations both men deny. A settlement in one of those lawsuits was later reached using funds from Epstein’s estate without admissions of wrongdoing. Lawmakers say questioning individuals who handled Epstein’s finances is essential to understanding how his wealth was managed, who may have benefited from it, and whether financial professionals helped maintain the structures that allowed Epstein’s activities to continue for years.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://abcnews.com/Politics/house-oversight-committee-depose-epsteins-longtime-accountant/story?id=130956011" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">House Oversight Committee to depose Epstein's longtime accountant - ABC News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72324197</guid><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72324197/richardkahnsettobedeposed.mp3" length="13780576" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a22cc79d-26fc-48d8-8ecd-a36c4df05712/a22cc79d-26fc-48d8-8ecd-a36c4df05712.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a22cc79d-26fc-48d8-8ecd-a36c4df05712/a22cc79d-26fc-48d8-8ecd-a36c4df05712.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a22cc79d-26fc-48d8-8ecd-a36c4df05712/a22cc79d-26fc-48d8-8ecd-a36c4df05712.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The House Oversight Committee is preparing to depose Richard Kahn, Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime accountant, as part of its expanding congressional investigation into how Epstein managed and protected his wealth while allegedly operating a years-long...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The House Oversight Committee is preparing to depose Richard Kahn, Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime accountant, as part of its expanding congressional investigation into how Epstein managed and protected his wealth while allegedly operating a years-long sex-trafficking network. Kahn worked for Epstein for more than a decade and helped oversee the financier’s complex financial structure, including trusts, shell entities, and other mechanisms that managed Epstein’s multimillion-dollar fortune. Lawmakers believe questioning Kahn could provide insight into how Epstein funded his operations, moved money through various accounts, and maintained financial secrecy while facing mounting allegations of abuse. The committee has indicated that Kahn’s knowledge of Epstein’s financial infrastructure may help clarify whether money flows or financial arrangements enabled or concealed the broader trafficking enterprise.<br /><br />The deposition is part of a broader congressional effort to map Epstein’s network of associates, advisers, and financial managers who may have played roles in his personal and business affairs. Kahn, along with Epstein’s longtime attorney Darren Indyke, previously served as co-executors of Epstein’s estate after his death in 2019 and has faced civil lawsuits from victims alleging they helped facilitate or conceal Epstein’s illegal activities, accusations both men deny. A settlement in one of those lawsuits was later reached using funds from Epstein’s estate without admissions of wrongdoing. Lawmakers say questioning individuals who handled Epstein’s finances is essential to understanding how his wealth was managed, who may have benefited from it, and whether financial professionals helped maintain the structures that allowed Epstein’s activities to continue for years.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://abcnews.com/Politics/house-oversight-committee-depose-epsteins-longtime-accountant/story?id=130956011" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">House Oversight Committee to depose Epstein's longtime accountant - ABC News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>862</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Jeffrey Epstein and the New York Academy of Art: Inside the Financial Ties</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/jeffrey-epstein-and-the-new-york-academy-of-art-inside-the-financial-ties--72324195</link><description><![CDATA[The New York Academy of Art has again come under scrutiny over its historical ties to Jeffrey Epstein after newly released federal documents revived questions about how closely the disgraced financier was connected to the institution and its leadership. Epstein served on the academy’s board in the late 1980s and early 1990s and later maintained a relationship with the school as a donor and patron, contributing money to scholarships and events while purchasing artwork from students. Records indicate that academy leaders continued interacting with Epstein for years after his 2008 conviction for soliciting prostitution from a minor, a relationship that critics say reflects the broader willingness of elite institutions to overlook his criminal history because of his wealth and influence.<br /><br />The renewed attention has prompted the academy to distance itself from Epstein’s legacy. The school announced it would redistribute funds linked to him to organizations that support survivors of sex trafficking and review its policies on donor relationships and ethics oversight. Leadership changes also followed the controversy, with board chair Eileen Guggenheim stepping down earlier than planned as the institution attempts to address criticism over how it handled Epstein’s involvement and the allegations raised by former students about his access to the school’s artistic community.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/13/nyregion/new-york-academy-of-art-epstein.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">New York Academy of Art Gives Away Money Donated by Jeffrey Epstein - The New York Times</a><br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72324195</guid><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72324195/nyartacademyepstein.mp3" length="15784690" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/109779fe-ca18-41fe-b9dc-252b1bc092e7/109779fe-ca18-41fe-b9dc-252b1bc092e7.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/109779fe-ca18-41fe-b9dc-252b1bc092e7/109779fe-ca18-41fe-b9dc-252b1bc092e7.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/109779fe-ca18-41fe-b9dc-252b1bc092e7/109779fe-ca18-41fe-b9dc-252b1bc092e7.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The New York Academy of Art has again come under scrutiny over its historical ties to Jeffrey Epstein after newly released federal documents revived questions about how closely the disgraced financier was connected to the institution and its...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The New York Academy of Art has again come under scrutiny over its historical ties to Jeffrey Epstein after newly released federal documents revived questions about how closely the disgraced financier was connected to the institution and its leadership. Epstein served on the academy’s board in the late 1980s and early 1990s and later maintained a relationship with the school as a donor and patron, contributing money to scholarships and events while purchasing artwork from students. Records indicate that academy leaders continued interacting with Epstein for years after his 2008 conviction for soliciting prostitution from a minor, a relationship that critics say reflects the broader willingness of elite institutions to overlook his criminal history because of his wealth and influence.<br /><br />The renewed attention has prompted the academy to distance itself from Epstein’s legacy. The school announced it would redistribute funds linked to him to organizations that support survivors of sex trafficking and review its policies on donor relationships and ethics oversight. Leadership changes also followed the controversy, with board chair Eileen Guggenheim stepping down earlier than planned as the institution attempts to address criticism over how it handled Epstein’s involvement and the allegations raised by former students about his access to the school’s artistic community.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/13/nyregion/new-york-academy-of-art-epstein.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">New York Academy of Art Gives Away Money Donated by Jeffrey Epstein - The New York Times</a><br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>987</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Captain Of Security Operations At MCC And His OIG Deposition (Part 7) (6/4/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-captain-of-security-operations-at-mcc-and-his-oig-deposition-part-7-6-4-26--72326254</link><description><![CDATA[The document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s death. The captain described the command structure inside the jail, including his role supervising lieutenants and reporting up to associate wardens or the warden, while investigators walked him through staffing, rosters, post assignments, suicide-watch procedures, SHU operations, and the chain of responsibility on August 9–10, 2019. The transcript is important because it does not present Epstein’s death as a clean, orderly institutional event; instead, it shows a jail struggling with bad staffing, confusing handoffs, unfilled posts, questionable paperwork, and a command structure where critical responsibilities appear to have been either missed, misunderstood, or passed around.<br /><br /><br />The most serious value of the interview is in the irregularities it surfaces. The captain reportedly discussed inaccurate rosters or logs, acknowledged questions around skipped SHU rounds, addressed the fact that Epstein had previously been on suicide watch, and said he would not necessarily have known in real time if officers were failing to conduct required checks. Even more troubling, he expressed concern that certain documents may have been deliberately removed from files that should have been reviewed or audited, and investigators also raised an inmate-count issue involving an inmate named Reyes, whose release may not have been properly reflected in the institution’s count — something the captain treated as a protocol violation. Taken together, the transcript adds another layer to the larger Epstein death record: not a single clean explanation, but a bureaucratic mess of missing or questionable documentation, staffing failures, broken supervision, and institutional chaos at precisely the moment when the most high-profile federal inmate in America was supposed to be under careful control.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00111830.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00111830.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72326254</guid><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 20:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72326254/dardenoig7.mp3" length="12725647" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1aa4a537-155c-4194-aeac-958fe2530e6b/1aa4a537-155c-4194-aeac-958fe2530e6b.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1aa4a537-155c-4194-aeac-958fe2530e6b/1aa4a537-155c-4194-aeac-958fe2530e6b.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1aa4a537-155c-4194-aeac-958fe2530e6b/1aa4a537-155c-4194-aeac-958fe2530e6b.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s death. The captain described the command...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s death. The captain described the command structure inside the jail, including his role supervising lieutenants and reporting up to associate wardens or the warden, while investigators walked him through staffing, rosters, post assignments, suicide-watch procedures, SHU operations, and the chain of responsibility on August 9–10, 2019. The transcript is important because it does not present Epstein’s death as a clean, orderly institutional event; instead, it shows a jail struggling with bad staffing, confusing handoffs, unfilled posts, questionable paperwork, and a command structure where critical responsibilities appear to have been either missed, misunderstood, or passed around.<br /><br /><br />The most serious value of the interview is in the irregularities it surfaces. The captain reportedly discussed inaccurate rosters or logs, acknowledged questions around skipped SHU rounds, addressed the fact that Epstein had previously been on suicide watch, and said he would not necessarily have known in real time if officers were failing to conduct required checks. Even more troubling, he expressed concern that certain documents may have been deliberately removed from files that should have been reviewed or audited, and investigators also raised an inmate-count issue involving an inmate named Reyes, whose release may not have been properly reflected in the institution’s count — something the captain treated as a protocol violation. Taken together, the transcript adds another layer to the larger Epstein death record: not a single clean explanation, but a bureaucratic mess of missing or questionable documentation, staffing failures, broken supervision, and institutional chaos at precisely the moment when the most high-profile federal inmate in America was supposed to be under careful control.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00111830.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00111830.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>796</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Trump Turns to Ghislaine Maxwell in Wall Street Journal Defamation Fight (6/4/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/trump-turns-to-ghislaine-maxwell-in-wall-street-journal-defamation-fight-6-4-26--72326250</link><description><![CDATA[Donald Trump has refiled his $10 billion defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal over its reporting on an alleged birthday letter to Jeffrey Epstein that was said to have appeared in a 2003 birthday album compiled by Ghislaine Maxwell. Trump denies writing the letter and his amended complaint continues to argue that no authentic letter or drawing exists, even though the House Oversight Committee later released the letter after obtaining it from Epstein’s estate. The renewed lawsuit comes after a federal judge dismissed Trump’s first version in April, finding that his legal team had not adequately pleaded “actual malice,” the demanding defamation standard public officials must meet when suing news organizations.<br /><br />The amended filing brings Ghislaine Maxwell into the case by pointing to her July 2025 interview with then-Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, in which she said she did not remember Trump submitting a letter, card, or note for Epstein’s birthday album. Trump’s lawyers are trying to use that statement to bolster the claim that the Journal published something false or recklessly unsupported, but the timing creates an obvious complication because Maxwell’s interview occurred after the Journal’s original reporting. The case now turns on whether Trump can prove that The Wall Street Journal, Dow Jones, News Corp, Rupert Murdoch, and the named reporters knowingly published false information or acted with reckless disregard for the truth, rather than simply reporting aggressively on a disputed Epstein-related document.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://okmagazine.com/p/donald-trump-ghislaine-maxwell-wall-street-journal-lawsuit-epstein-letter/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Trump Cites Maxwell In $10 Billion 'Wall Street Journal' Lawsuit</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72326250</guid><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 18:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72326250/trumpwsjlawsuitmaxwellwitness.mp3" length="10782973" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/dd6e6f67-53d5-4c66-9d02-6f6fda56d884/dd6e6f67-53d5-4c66-9d02-6f6fda56d884.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/dd6e6f67-53d5-4c66-9d02-6f6fda56d884/dd6e6f67-53d5-4c66-9d02-6f6fda56d884.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/dd6e6f67-53d5-4c66-9d02-6f6fda56d884/dd6e6f67-53d5-4c66-9d02-6f6fda56d884.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Donald Trump has refiled his $10 billion defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal over its reporting on an alleged birthday letter to Jeffrey Epstein that was said to have appeared in a 2003 birthday album compiled by Ghislaine Maxwell....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Donald Trump has refiled his $10 billion defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal over its reporting on an alleged birthday letter to Jeffrey Epstein that was said to have appeared in a 2003 birthday album compiled by Ghislaine Maxwell. Trump denies writing the letter and his amended complaint continues to argue that no authentic letter or drawing exists, even though the House Oversight Committee later released the letter after obtaining it from Epstein’s estate. The renewed lawsuit comes after a federal judge dismissed Trump’s first version in April, finding that his legal team had not adequately pleaded “actual malice,” the demanding defamation standard public officials must meet when suing news organizations.<br /><br />The amended filing brings Ghislaine Maxwell into the case by pointing to her July 2025 interview with then-Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, in which she said she did not remember Trump submitting a letter, card, or note for Epstein’s birthday album. Trump’s lawyers are trying to use that statement to bolster the claim that the Journal published something false or recklessly unsupported, but the timing creates an obvious complication because Maxwell’s interview occurred after the Journal’s original reporting. The case now turns on whether Trump can prove that The Wall Street Journal, Dow Jones, News Corp, Rupert Murdoch, and the named reporters knowingly published false information or acted with reckless disregard for the truth, rather than simply reporting aggressively on a disputed Epstein-related document.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://okmagazine.com/p/donald-trump-ghislaine-maxwell-wall-street-journal-lawsuit-epstein-letter/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Trump Cites Maxwell In $10 Billion 'Wall Street Journal' Lawsuit</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>674</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Mandelson Files: Redactions, Vetting Questions, and a Prime Ministerial Paper Trail (6/4/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-mandelson-files-redactions-vetting-questions-and-a-prime-ministerial-paper-trail-6-4-26--72326249</link><description><![CDATA[More than 1,500 pages of documents tied to Peter Mandelson’s controversial appointment as Britain’s ambassador to the United States were released, but the release immediately triggered more questions than answers. The files reportedly showed Mandelson aggressively lobbying for the Washington post, promising ministers they would “never regret” appointing him, while also revealing internal Labour messages that painted a bleak picture of Keir Starmer’s leadership and the mood inside government. But huge sections of the document dump were redacted on national security and diplomatic grounds, and at least one key vetting summary was withheld because of an ongoing police investigation into Mandelson. Opposition MPs seized on the apparent absence of Starmer’s direct paper trail, questioning how such a major appointment could happen with so little visible documentation from the Prime Minister himself.<br /><br />The most damaging unanswered questions revolve around what was missing: redacted pages, absent WhatsApp messages, disappearing-message settings, and undisclosed vetting material. No. 10 acknowledged that Starmer uses disappearing messages on WhatsApp, saying this can be consistent with government guidance, but critics argue it raises obvious questions about whether key communications about Mandelson’s appointment are now gone. The release also intensified scrutiny of Mandelson’s Epstein-related baggage, his reported security-vetting problems, and why the government pushed ahead with the appointment despite reputational and political warnings. In plain terms, the document dump was supposed to close the book, but instead it opened a new chapter: who backed Mandelson, what did Starmer know, what did the vetting process flag, and how much of the record has been hidden, deleted, or redacted?<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/39282085/mandelson-docs-bombshell-texts-redacted-pm-loathed/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Five questions STILL unanswered after 1,000s of bombshell Mandelson docs - redacted files, missing texts and PM loathed</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72326249</guid><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 16:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72326249/whatsmissingmandelsonfiles.mp3" length="15308635" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/69f5d29c-fa18-4ead-b338-5bf93bfb0e9f/69f5d29c-fa18-4ead-b338-5bf93bfb0e9f.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/69f5d29c-fa18-4ead-b338-5bf93bfb0e9f/69f5d29c-fa18-4ead-b338-5bf93bfb0e9f.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/69f5d29c-fa18-4ead-b338-5bf93bfb0e9f/69f5d29c-fa18-4ead-b338-5bf93bfb0e9f.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>More than 1,500 pages of documents tied to Peter Mandelson’s controversial appointment as Britain’s ambassador to the United States were released, but the release immediately triggered more questions than answers. The files reportedly showed Mandelson...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[More than 1,500 pages of documents tied to Peter Mandelson’s controversial appointment as Britain’s ambassador to the United States were released, but the release immediately triggered more questions than answers. The files reportedly showed Mandelson aggressively lobbying for the Washington post, promising ministers they would “never regret” appointing him, while also revealing internal Labour messages that painted a bleak picture of Keir Starmer’s leadership and the mood inside government. But huge sections of the document dump were redacted on national security and diplomatic grounds, and at least one key vetting summary was withheld because of an ongoing police investigation into Mandelson. Opposition MPs seized on the apparent absence of Starmer’s direct paper trail, questioning how such a major appointment could happen with so little visible documentation from the Prime Minister himself.<br /><br />The most damaging unanswered questions revolve around what was missing: redacted pages, absent WhatsApp messages, disappearing-message settings, and undisclosed vetting material. No. 10 acknowledged that Starmer uses disappearing messages on WhatsApp, saying this can be consistent with government guidance, but critics argue it raises obvious questions about whether key communications about Mandelson’s appointment are now gone. The release also intensified scrutiny of Mandelson’s Epstein-related baggage, his reported security-vetting problems, and why the government pushed ahead with the appointment despite reputational and political warnings. In plain terms, the document dump was supposed to close the book, but instead it opened a new chapter: who backed Mandelson, what did Starmer know, what did the vetting process flag, and how much of the record has been hidden, deleted, or redacted?<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/39282085/mandelson-docs-bombshell-texts-redacted-pm-loathed/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Five questions STILL unanswered after 1,000s of bombshell Mandelson docs - redacted files, missing texts and PM loathed</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>957</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Epstein’s Brokerage Trail: Fidelity and the Millions That Moved Before His Arrest (6/4/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/epstein-s-brokerage-trail-fidelity-and-the-millions-that-moved-before-his-arrest-6-4-26--72326246</link><description><![CDATA[Fidelity opened a brokerage account for a Jeffrey Epstein-owned company in mid-April 2019, just months before Epstein’s July 2019 arrest and at a time when public outrage over his earlier sweetheart deal was already intensifying. The account was opened for Southern Trust Company, Epstein’s Virgin Islands-based entity, and it received more than $5 million before Fidelity apparently moved to restrict it to “closing transactions only” in late May 2019. The account was disclosed in a suspicious activity report filed after Epstein’s arrest, and the details came from a Justice Department file that was briefly released as part of Epstein-related disclosures before later being replaced with a fully redacted version.<br /><br />The timing is the central issue: Fidelity opened the account after the Miami Herald’s major 2018 reporting had renewed scrutiny of Epstein, after a federal judge ruled that DOJ had violated victims’ rights in the 2008 deal, and after more than 100 lawmakers had demanded that DOJ reopen the Epstein investigation. The Fidelity account reportedly moved millions, including funds wired from Deutsche Bank and later large transfers to Puerto Rican banks, before the account appeared to be emptied by the time Fidelity filed its SAR. The revelation adds Fidelity to the list of major financial institutions that handled Epstein-linked money, alongside JPMorgan, Deutsche Bank, and Charles Schwab, and it raises the same core question that has followed the Epstein money trail for years: why did powerful financial institutions continue servicing him even when the public record already made him radioactive?<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.icij.org/news/2026/06/fidelity-opened-account-for-epstein-even-as-outrage-grew/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Fidelity opened account for Epstein, even as outrage grew - ICIJ</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72326246</guid><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72326246/epsteinfidelityaccount.mp3" length="12002995" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5e78a26a-492a-4e38-b2c6-117495245433/5e78a26a-492a-4e38-b2c6-117495245433.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5e78a26a-492a-4e38-b2c6-117495245433/5e78a26a-492a-4e38-b2c6-117495245433.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5e78a26a-492a-4e38-b2c6-117495245433/5e78a26a-492a-4e38-b2c6-117495245433.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Fidelity opened a brokerage account for a Jeffrey Epstein-owned company in mid-April 2019, just months before Epstein’s July 2019 arrest and at a time when public outrage over his earlier sweetheart deal was already intensifying. The account was...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Fidelity opened a brokerage account for a Jeffrey Epstein-owned company in mid-April 2019, just months before Epstein’s July 2019 arrest and at a time when public outrage over his earlier sweetheart deal was already intensifying. The account was opened for Southern Trust Company, Epstein’s Virgin Islands-based entity, and it received more than $5 million before Fidelity apparently moved to restrict it to “closing transactions only” in late May 2019. The account was disclosed in a suspicious activity report filed after Epstein’s arrest, and the details came from a Justice Department file that was briefly released as part of Epstein-related disclosures before later being replaced with a fully redacted version.<br /><br />The timing is the central issue: Fidelity opened the account after the Miami Herald’s major 2018 reporting had renewed scrutiny of Epstein, after a federal judge ruled that DOJ had violated victims’ rights in the 2008 deal, and after more than 100 lawmakers had demanded that DOJ reopen the Epstein investigation. The Fidelity account reportedly moved millions, including funds wired from Deutsche Bank and later large transfers to Puerto Rican banks, before the account appeared to be emptied by the time Fidelity filed its SAR. The revelation adds Fidelity to the list of major financial institutions that handled Epstein-linked money, alongside JPMorgan, Deutsche Bank, and Charles Schwab, and it raises the same core question that has followed the Epstein money trail for years: why did powerful financial institutions continue servicing him even when the public record already made him radioactive?<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.icij.org/news/2026/06/fidelity-opened-account-for-epstein-even-as-outrage-grew/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Fidelity opened account for Epstein, even as outrage grew - ICIJ</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>751</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   The USVI And JP Morgan Trade Allegations During Their Court Battle (6/4/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-usvi-and-jp-morgan-trade-allegations-during-their-court-battle-6-4-26--72324174</link><description><![CDATA[The battle between JP Morgan and the U.S. Virgin Islands over Jeffrey Epstein became one of the ugliest institutional fights to come out of the Epstein scandal because both sides were effectively accusing the other of enabling him. The USVI sued JP Morgan by arguing that the bank was not merely a passive financial institution but a crucial piece of Epstein’s machinery, claiming it processed huge sums of money for him, ignored glaring red flags, allowed cash withdrawals and payments tied to his abuse network, and continued servicing him long after his sex-crime history was public. The territory’s theory was that Epstein’s operation depended on respectable financial plumbing, and that JP Morgan supplied it while collecting fees, protecting a wealthy client, and looking away from the obvious. JP Morgan denied knowingly helping Epstein’s crimes and fired back by pointing the finger at the USVI itself, arguing that territorial officials gave Epstein tax benefits, political access, licenses, permits, and room to operate on Little St. James while accepting his money and influence.<br /><br />That is what made the litigation so brutal: it was not just about Epstein, but about which institution wanted the court to believe the other side had dirtier hands. The USVI tried to frame JP Morgan as the bank that kept Epstein financially alive; JP Morgan tried to frame the USVI as the jurisdiction that let him build his island kingdom in plain sight. Discovery dragged major names into the fight, including former JP Morgan executive Jes Staley, whose relationship with Epstein became a central part of the bank’s internal blame game. In the end, JP Morgan agreed in September 2023 to pay $75 million to settle the USVI case, while admitting no wrongdoing, after separately agreeing to a $290 million settlement with Epstein victims. The settlement did not answer every question, but it did confirm the larger reality: Epstein’s operation was not just protected by private secrecy, but by a whole ecosystem of banks, lawyers, officials, enablers, and institutions that later tried to shove the blame onto each other once the paper trail became impossible to bury.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72324174</guid><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72324174/megabrutalbattlejpmorganusvi.mp3" length="46275231" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8e6313dd-6c98-45a9-baf6-9773c64a8293/8e6313dd-6c98-45a9-baf6-9773c64a8293.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8e6313dd-6c98-45a9-baf6-9773c64a8293/8e6313dd-6c98-45a9-baf6-9773c64a8293.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8e6313dd-6c98-45a9-baf6-9773c64a8293/8e6313dd-6c98-45a9-baf6-9773c64a8293.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The battle between JP Morgan and the U.S. Virgin Islands over Jeffrey Epstein became one of the ugliest institutional fights to come out of the Epstein scandal because both sides were effectively accusing the other of enabling him. The USVI sued JP...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The battle between JP Morgan and the U.S. Virgin Islands over Jeffrey Epstein became one of the ugliest institutional fights to come out of the Epstein scandal because both sides were effectively accusing the other of enabling him. The USVI sued JP Morgan by arguing that the bank was not merely a passive financial institution but a crucial piece of Epstein’s machinery, claiming it processed huge sums of money for him, ignored glaring red flags, allowed cash withdrawals and payments tied to his abuse network, and continued servicing him long after his sex-crime history was public. The territory’s theory was that Epstein’s operation depended on respectable financial plumbing, and that JP Morgan supplied it while collecting fees, protecting a wealthy client, and looking away from the obvious. JP Morgan denied knowingly helping Epstein’s crimes and fired back by pointing the finger at the USVI itself, arguing that territorial officials gave Epstein tax benefits, political access, licenses, permits, and room to operate on Little St. James while accepting his money and influence.<br /><br />That is what made the litigation so brutal: it was not just about Epstein, but about which institution wanted the court to believe the other side had dirtier hands. The USVI tried to frame JP Morgan as the bank that kept Epstein financially alive; JP Morgan tried to frame the USVI as the jurisdiction that let him build his island kingdom in plain sight. Discovery dragged major names into the fight, including former JP Morgan executive Jes Staley, whose relationship with Epstein became a central part of the bank’s internal blame game. In the end, JP Morgan agreed in September 2023 to pay $75 million to settle the USVI case, while admitting no wrongdoing, after separately agreeing to a $290 million settlement with Epstein victims. The settlement did not answer every question, but it did confirm the larger reality: Epstein’s operation was not just protected by private secrecy, but by a whole ecosystem of banks, lawyers, officials, enablers, and institutions that later tried to shove the blame onto each other once the paper trail became impossible to bury.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2893</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The Florida Court Documents Are Unsealed (6/4/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-florida-court-documents-are-unsealed-6-4-26--72324175</link><description><![CDATA[The released Florida grand jury documents gave the public a rare look at the machinery that helped produce Jeffrey Epstein’s so-called sweetheart deal, and what they showed only made the original handling of the case look worse. The transcripts revealed that the 2006 Palm Beach grand jury heard from only two alleged underage victims, along with law enforcement witnesses, in a proceeding that lasted less than four hours, even though Palm Beach police had identified far more potential victims and had built a broader case involving allegations of sexual abuse, cash payments, and recruitment of other girls. Instead of the full weight of the investigation being presented in a way that reflected the seriousness of the allegations, the testimony showed the girls being questioned in ways that put their conduct, credibility, and supposed “prostitution” at the center of the discussion. That glimpse matters because it helps explain how a case that could have been treated as a sweeping sex-crimes investigation was narrowed into charges that allowed Epstein to plead guilty in 2008 to state prostitution-related offenses, serve a limited sentence with work release, and avoid the full force of federal prosecution at that time.<br /><br />But the documents did not answer the central question; they sharpened it. Why were so few victims presented? Why was the grand jury shown such a limited version of the case? What charging options were actually put in front of jurors? Why did prosecutors frame teenage victims in a way that seemed to weaken the case instead of strengthen it? And how did that state process connect to the later federal non-prosecution agreement that protected Epstein and possible co-conspirators while keeping victims in the dark? The release gave the public a window into the early failure, but it did not fully explain who made each decision, what pressure was applied behind the scenes, or why a wealthy, connected offender received treatment so wildly different from what ordinary defendants would have faced. In that sense, the grand jury documents are not the end of the Epstein Florida story; they are evidence of how much of it was buried, narrowed, softened, and left unresolved.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72324175</guid><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72324175/megaepsteinfloridagjreleasedabomination.mp3" length="53410630" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/714addd2-d257-4841-925c-ae87f4b14307/714addd2-d257-4841-925c-ae87f4b14307.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/714addd2-d257-4841-925c-ae87f4b14307/714addd2-d257-4841-925c-ae87f4b14307.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/714addd2-d257-4841-925c-ae87f4b14307/714addd2-d257-4841-925c-ae87f4b14307.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The released Florida grand jury documents gave the public a rare look at the machinery that helped produce Jeffrey Epstein’s so-called sweetheart deal, and what they showed only made the original handling of the case look worse. The transcripts...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The released Florida grand jury documents gave the public a rare look at the machinery that helped produce Jeffrey Epstein’s so-called sweetheart deal, and what they showed only made the original handling of the case look worse. The transcripts revealed that the 2006 Palm Beach grand jury heard from only two alleged underage victims, along with law enforcement witnesses, in a proceeding that lasted less than four hours, even though Palm Beach police had identified far more potential victims and had built a broader case involving allegations of sexual abuse, cash payments, and recruitment of other girls. Instead of the full weight of the investigation being presented in a way that reflected the seriousness of the allegations, the testimony showed the girls being questioned in ways that put their conduct, credibility, and supposed “prostitution” at the center of the discussion. That glimpse matters because it helps explain how a case that could have been treated as a sweeping sex-crimes investigation was narrowed into charges that allowed Epstein to plead guilty in 2008 to state prostitution-related offenses, serve a limited sentence with work release, and avoid the full force of federal prosecution at that time.<br /><br />But the documents did not answer the central question; they sharpened it. Why were so few victims presented? Why was the grand jury shown such a limited version of the case? What charging options were actually put in front of jurors? Why did prosecutors frame teenage victims in a way that seemed to weaken the case instead of strengthen it? And how did that state process connect to the later federal non-prosecution agreement that protected Epstein and possible co-conspirators while keeping victims in the dark? The release gave the public a window into the early failure, but it did not fully explain who made each decision, what pressure was applied behind the scenes, or why a wealthy, connected offender received treatment so wildly different from what ordinary defendants would have faced. In that sense, the grand jury documents are not the end of the Epstein Florida story; they are evidence of how much of it was buried, narrowed, softened, and left unresolved.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3339</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The Battle To Unseal The Epstein Court Documents In Florida (6/3/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-battle-to-unseal-the-epstein-court-documents-in-florida-6-3-26--72324173</link><description><![CDATA[The release of the Florida grand jury documents tied to Jeffrey Epstein took years because the records were locked behind Florida’s traditional grand jury secrecy rules, even though the 2006 Palm Beach proceedings had become one of the most controversial points in the entire Epstein saga. Those transcripts mattered because the grand jury process helped produce the weak state-level charges that allowed Epstein to avoid the much more serious sex-trafficking and rape allegations that Palm Beach police had been investigating. For years, journalists, survivors, and transparency advocates argued that the public had a right to know what prosecutors actually presented to the grand jury, why only limited charges emerged, and whether the system had been tilted in Epstein’s favor from the start. But courts repeatedly ran into the same wall: grand jury material is normally secret, and Florida law did not clearly allow release just because the case was historically important, politically explosive, or publicly outrageous.<br /><br />It ultimately took sustained litigation, including efforts by the Palm Beach Post’s parent company, along with a change in Florida law, to pry the records loose. In 2024, Governor Ron DeSantis signed legislation allowing the release of old grand jury materials in cases where the subject was dead and the records involved conduct such as sexual abuse of minors. Once that law was in place, a Palm Beach County judge released the 2006 transcripts, which showed that the grand jury heard from only two alleged victims and that the proceeding lasted less than four hours, despite police having identified many more potential victims. The released material intensified criticism of the original handling of the case because it showed how limited the presentation was and how the girls’ credibility and conduct were scrutinized while Epstein escaped with the infamous sweetheart deal that defined the Florida chapter of the scandal. In other words, the public did not get those records because the system suddenly became transparent; it took years of lawsuits, public pressure, and a legislative carveout to force daylight into a process that had helped bury the scale of Epstein’s crimes.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />sourcve:<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72324173</guid><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72324173/megabattleforfloridagrandjurydocs.mp3" length="58546960" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/df8c9d94-1941-4dfc-876f-af33f1f73a0a/df8c9d94-1941-4dfc-876f-af33f1f73a0a.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/df8c9d94-1941-4dfc-876f-af33f1f73a0a/df8c9d94-1941-4dfc-876f-af33f1f73a0a.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/df8c9d94-1941-4dfc-876f-af33f1f73a0a/df8c9d94-1941-4dfc-876f-af33f1f73a0a.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The release of the Florida grand jury documents tied to Jeffrey Epstein took years because the records were locked behind Florida’s traditional grand jury secrecy rules, even though the 2006 Palm Beach proceedings had become one of the most...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The release of the Florida grand jury documents tied to Jeffrey Epstein took years because the records were locked behind Florida’s traditional grand jury secrecy rules, even though the 2006 Palm Beach proceedings had become one of the most controversial points in the entire Epstein saga. Those transcripts mattered because the grand jury process helped produce the weak state-level charges that allowed Epstein to avoid the much more serious sex-trafficking and rape allegations that Palm Beach police had been investigating. For years, journalists, survivors, and transparency advocates argued that the public had a right to know what prosecutors actually presented to the grand jury, why only limited charges emerged, and whether the system had been tilted in Epstein’s favor from the start. But courts repeatedly ran into the same wall: grand jury material is normally secret, and Florida law did not clearly allow release just because the case was historically important, politically explosive, or publicly outrageous.<br /><br />It ultimately took sustained litigation, including efforts by the Palm Beach Post’s parent company, along with a change in Florida law, to pry the records loose. In 2024, Governor Ron DeSantis signed legislation allowing the release of old grand jury materials in cases where the subject was dead and the records involved conduct such as sexual abuse of minors. Once that law was in place, a Palm Beach County judge released the 2006 transcripts, which showed that the grand jury heard from only two alleged victims and that the proceeding lasted less than four hours, despite police having identified many more potential victims. The released material intensified criticism of the original handling of the case because it showed how limited the presentation was and how the girls’ credibility and conduct were scrutinized while Epstein escaped with the infamous sweetheart deal that defined the Florida chapter of the scandal. In other words, the public did not get those records because the system suddenly became transparent; it took years of lawsuits, public pressure, and a legislative carveout to force daylight into a process that had helped bury the scale of Epstein’s crimes.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />sourcve:<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3660</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Newly Surfaced Video Undermines  Timeline of Guard Activity on Night of Epstein’s Death</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/newly-surfaced-video-undermines-timeline-of-guard-activity-on-night-of-epstein-s-death--72324206</link><description><![CDATA[Newly released surveillance footage from the night of Jeffrey Epstein’s death shows correctional officers Tova Noel and Michael Thomas failing to carry out required security checks while stationed just feet from his cell. Instead of performing mandatory 30-minute rounds—particularly a critical 3 a.m. check—the guards were seen walking around, writing, and using a phone in the Special Housing Unit, despite clear instructions that Epstein required close monitoring after being taken off suicide watch.<br /><br />The footage adds to a broader pattern of failures that night. Epstein had been left alone after his cellmate was removed, despite orders that he should always have one, and additional bedding materials were left in his cell, which he later used in his death. Investigators previously found the guards falsified records to make it appear they conducted checks they actually skipped. While both were fired and charged, the case against them was later dropped, and the newly surfaced video is now intensifying scrutiny over what happened inside the facility that night.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://nypost.com/2026/03/21/us-news/new-video-shows-guards-milling-about-while-epstein-a-few-feet-away-in-his-cell-possibly-dead/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Exclusive | New video shows guards milling about while Epstein a few feet away in his cell, possibly dead</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72324206</guid><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72324206/epsteinguardsinonit.mp3" length="14083596" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/346c9317-935e-48f3-aca9-0f8467727b1e/346c9317-935e-48f3-aca9-0f8467727b1e.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/346c9317-935e-48f3-aca9-0f8467727b1e/346c9317-935e-48f3-aca9-0f8467727b1e.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/346c9317-935e-48f3-aca9-0f8467727b1e/346c9317-935e-48f3-aca9-0f8467727b1e.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Newly released surveillance footage from the night of Jeffrey Epstein’s death shows correctional officers Tova Noel and Michael Thomas failing to carry out required security checks while stationed just feet from his cell. Instead of performing...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Newly released surveillance footage from the night of Jeffrey Epstein’s death shows correctional officers Tova Noel and Michael Thomas failing to carry out required security checks while stationed just feet from his cell. Instead of performing mandatory 30-minute rounds—particularly a critical 3 a.m. check—the guards were seen walking around, writing, and using a phone in the Special Housing Unit, despite clear instructions that Epstein required close monitoring after being taken off suicide watch.<br /><br />The footage adds to a broader pattern of failures that night. Epstein had been left alone after his cellmate was removed, despite orders that he should always have one, and additional bedding materials were left in his cell, which he later used in his death. Investigators previously found the guards falsified records to make it appear they conducted checks they actually skipped. While both were fired and charged, the case against them was later dropped, and the newly surfaced video is now intensifying scrutiny over what happened inside the facility that night.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://nypost.com/2026/03/21/us-news/new-video-shows-guards-milling-about-while-epstein-a-few-feet-away-in-his-cell-possibly-dead/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Exclusive | New video shows guards milling about while Epstein a few feet away in his cell, possibly dead</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>881</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Peggy Siegal and Jeffrey Epstein: The Publicist Who Helped Rebuild a Predator’s Social Network</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/peggy-siegal-and-jeffrey-epstein-the-publicist-who-helped-rebuild-a-predator-s-social-network--72324204</link><description><![CDATA[A longtime Hollywood publicist, Peggy Siegal, revealed that she maintained a close relationship with Jeffrey Epstein for years, even acknowledging she knew he was “morally compromised” and a “con man,” yet continued helping him regain access to elite social circles after his 2008 conviction. She admitted facilitating invitations to high-profile events, dinners, and gatherings with A-list figures, effectively acting as a gatekeeper who helped rehabilitate his image among powerful and influential people. Siegal also disclosed that Epstein gave her a $100,000 gift for her 70th birthday, underscoring the financial ties and personal benefits that existed alongside their social relationship.<br /><br />Emails between the two further revealed disturbing discussions, including Epstein’s expressed desire to find a “baby mama” with specific traits, with Siegal actively engaging in the conversation and suggesting potential candidates. She later characterized her behavior as being “in denial,” admitting she understood he had done something wrong but avoided confronting the severity of his conduct. The revelations add to the broader picture of how Epstein was able to reintegrate into elite circles with the assistance of well-connected figures who, despite recognizing red flags, continued to associate with and enable him.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/a-list-publicist-reveals-epsteins-baby-mama-search-100k-gift-bombshells-peggy-siegals-tell-all" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Hollywood publicist admits knowing Jeffrey Epstein was 'morally compromised' | Fox News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72324204</guid><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72324204/peggysiegelepstein.mp3" length="13042042" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/409d2f4c-0da8-42d1-b79c-7f6e22c1c35f/409d2f4c-0da8-42d1-b79c-7f6e22c1c35f.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/409d2f4c-0da8-42d1-b79c-7f6e22c1c35f/409d2f4c-0da8-42d1-b79c-7f6e22c1c35f.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/409d2f4c-0da8-42d1-b79c-7f6e22c1c35f/409d2f4c-0da8-42d1-b79c-7f6e22c1c35f.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A longtime Hollywood publicist, Peggy Siegal, revealed that she maintained a close relationship with Jeffrey Epstein for years, even acknowledging she knew he was “morally compromised” and a “con man,” yet continued helping him regain access to elite...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A longtime Hollywood publicist, Peggy Siegal, revealed that she maintained a close relationship with Jeffrey Epstein for years, even acknowledging she knew he was “morally compromised” and a “con man,” yet continued helping him regain access to elite social circles after his 2008 conviction. She admitted facilitating invitations to high-profile events, dinners, and gatherings with A-list figures, effectively acting as a gatekeeper who helped rehabilitate his image among powerful and influential people. Siegal also disclosed that Epstein gave her a $100,000 gift for her 70th birthday, underscoring the financial ties and personal benefits that existed alongside their social relationship.<br /><br />Emails between the two further revealed disturbing discussions, including Epstein’s expressed desire to find a “baby mama” with specific traits, with Siegal actively engaging in the conversation and suggesting potential candidates. She later characterized her behavior as being “in denial,” admitting she understood he had done something wrong but avoided confronting the severity of his conduct. The revelations add to the broader picture of how Epstein was able to reintegrate into elite circles with the assistance of well-connected figures who, despite recognizing red flags, continued to associate with and enable him.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/a-list-publicist-reveals-epsteins-baby-mama-search-100k-gift-bombshells-peggy-siegals-tell-all" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Hollywood publicist admits knowing Jeffrey Epstein was 'morally compromised' | Fox News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>816</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Virginia Robert's Repsonds To Ghislaine Maxwell's "Undisputed Facts" (Part 9)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/virginia-robert-s-repsonds-to-ghislaine-maxwell-s-undisputed-facts-part-9--72227862</link><description><![CDATA[In response to Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 56.1 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, Virginia Giuffre (formerly known as Virginia Roberts) submitted a detailed counterstatement challenging Maxwell's assertions. Giuffre disputed Maxwell's denials of involvement in Jeffrey Epstein's alleged sexual abuse and trafficking operations, providing specific instances and evidence to support her claims. She contended that Maxwell's public statements dismissing her allegations as false were themselves defamatory and aimed at discrediting her experiences as a victim. Giuffre's response emphasized the existence of genuine disputes over material facts, arguing that these issues necessitated a trial to resolve the conflicting accounts.<br /><br />Giuffre's counterstatement also highlighted inconsistencies and omissions in Maxwell's narrative, aiming to demonstrate that Maxwell's involvement with Epstein was more extensive than acknowledged. By presenting corroborative testimonies and documentary evidence, Giuffre sought to undermine Maxwell's credibility and reinforce the legitimacy of her own allegations<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72227862</guid><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72227862/virgrespfact9.mp3" length="12197764" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c74a6de9-bb99-4f2b-a23e-6a027a23c1b3/c74a6de9-bb99-4f2b-a23e-6a027a23c1b3.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c74a6de9-bb99-4f2b-a23e-6a027a23c1b3/c74a6de9-bb99-4f2b-a23e-6a027a23c1b3.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c74a6de9-bb99-4f2b-a23e-6a027a23c1b3/c74a6de9-bb99-4f2b-a23e-6a027a23c1b3.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In response to Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 56.1 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, Virginia Giuffre (formerly known as Virginia Roberts) submitted a detailed counterstatement challenging Maxwell's assertions. Giuffre disputed Maxwell's denials of...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In response to Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 56.1 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, Virginia Giuffre (formerly known as Virginia Roberts) submitted a detailed counterstatement challenging Maxwell's assertions. Giuffre disputed Maxwell's denials of involvement in Jeffrey Epstein's alleged sexual abuse and trafficking operations, providing specific instances and evidence to support her claims. She contended that Maxwell's public statements dismissing her allegations as false were themselves defamatory and aimed at discrediting her experiences as a victim. Giuffre's response emphasized the existence of genuine disputes over material facts, arguing that these issues necessitated a trial to resolve the conflicting accounts.<br /><br />Giuffre's counterstatement also highlighted inconsistencies and omissions in Maxwell's narrative, aiming to demonstrate that Maxwell's involvement with Epstein was more extensive than acknowledged. By presenting corroborative testimonies and documentary evidence, Giuffre sought to undermine Maxwell's credibility and reinforce the legitimacy of her own allegations<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>763</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Virginia Robert's Repsonds To Ghislaine Maxwell's "Undisputed Facts" (Part 8)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/virginia-robert-s-repsonds-to-ghislaine-maxwell-s-undisputed-facts-part-8--72227864</link><description><![CDATA[In response to Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 56.1 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, Virginia Giuffre (formerly known as Virginia Roberts) submitted a detailed counterstatement challenging Maxwell's assertions. Giuffre disputed Maxwell's denials of involvement in Jeffrey Epstein's alleged sexual abuse and trafficking operations, providing specific instances and evidence to support her claims. She contended that Maxwell's public statements dismissing her allegations as false were themselves defamatory and aimed at discrediting her experiences as a victim. Giuffre's response emphasized the existence of genuine disputes over material facts, arguing that these issues necessitated a trial to resolve the conflicting accounts.<br /><br />Giuffre's counterstatement also highlighted inconsistencies and omissions in Maxwell's narrative, aiming to demonstrate that Maxwell's involvement with Epstein was more extensive than acknowledged. By presenting corroborative testimonies and documentary evidence, Giuffre sought to undermine Maxwell's credibility and reinforce the legitimacy of her own allegations<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72227864</guid><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72227864/virgrespfact8.mp3" length="13169519" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cc73eac6-20f4-450c-abe0-dc953e5df51f/cc73eac6-20f4-450c-abe0-dc953e5df51f.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cc73eac6-20f4-450c-abe0-dc953e5df51f/cc73eac6-20f4-450c-abe0-dc953e5df51f.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cc73eac6-20f4-450c-abe0-dc953e5df51f/cc73eac6-20f4-450c-abe0-dc953e5df51f.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In response to Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 56.1 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, Virginia Giuffre (formerly known as Virginia Roberts) submitted a detailed counterstatement challenging Maxwell's assertions. Giuffre disputed Maxwell's denials of...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In response to Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 56.1 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, Virginia Giuffre (formerly known as Virginia Roberts) submitted a detailed counterstatement challenging Maxwell's assertions. Giuffre disputed Maxwell's denials of involvement in Jeffrey Epstein's alleged sexual abuse and trafficking operations, providing specific instances and evidence to support her claims. She contended that Maxwell's public statements dismissing her allegations as false were themselves defamatory and aimed at discrediting her experiences as a victim. Giuffre's response emphasized the existence of genuine disputes over material facts, arguing that these issues necessitated a trial to resolve the conflicting accounts.<br /><br />Giuffre's counterstatement also highlighted inconsistencies and omissions in Maxwell's narrative, aiming to demonstrate that Maxwell's involvement with Epstein was more extensive than acknowledged. By presenting corroborative testimonies and documentary evidence, Giuffre sought to undermine Maxwell's credibility and reinforce the legitimacy of her own allegations<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>824</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Deleted Tape: Amanda Ungaro, Jeffrey Epstein, and Melania Trump (6/3/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-deleted-tape-amanda-ungaro-jeffrey-epstein-and-melania-trump-6-3-26--72301585</link><description><![CDATA[Amanda Ungaro, a former Brazilian model and former partner of Paolo Zampolli, claimed in a deleted online recording that Melania Trump knew Jeffrey Epstein before she met Donald Trump and that Epstein, not Zampolli, was the person who introduced the couple. The allegations also point to a reported 2019 FBI proffer interview in which a former Epstein assistant allegedly said Epstein introduced Melania to Trump. The same material describes Epstein as being familiar with Zampolli’s modeling-agency world, including claims that Epstein visited the agency during casting activity and discussed acquiring Elite Models with Zampolli.<br /><br />The article also lays out the competing denials and credibility issues surrounding the allegation. Melania Trump has said she met Donald Trump by chance at a New York party in 1998, while Zampolli has denied Ungaro’s claims and maintained that he was the one who introduced them. Ungaro and Zampolli had documented connections to Trump’s orbit, including attendance at inauguration-related events and time at Mar-a-Lago, but Ungaro’s claims are presented alongside disputes over her credibility, including a custody battle, deportation to Brazil, and fraud-related legal problems. The result is a contested set of claims about the Epstein-Zampolli-Melania-Trump timeline, with the central allegations still unresolved.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/allegations-linking-melania-trump-jeffrey-epstein-1800225" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Former Brazilian Model Claims Melania Trump Was an 'Escort' for Jeffrey Epstein Before She Met Donald Trump | IBTimes UK</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72301585</guid><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72301585/newungaromelaniaclaims.mp3" length="10655495" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e7f1d44c-6c37-4486-befd-c5e0aab60a72/e7f1d44c-6c37-4486-befd-c5e0aab60a72.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e7f1d44c-6c37-4486-befd-c5e0aab60a72/e7f1d44c-6c37-4486-befd-c5e0aab60a72.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e7f1d44c-6c37-4486-befd-c5e0aab60a72/e7f1d44c-6c37-4486-befd-c5e0aab60a72.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Amanda Ungaro, a former Brazilian model and former partner of Paolo Zampolli, claimed in a deleted online recording that Melania Trump knew Jeffrey Epstein before she met Donald Trump and that Epstein, not Zampolli, was the person who introduced the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Amanda Ungaro, a former Brazilian model and former partner of Paolo Zampolli, claimed in a deleted online recording that Melania Trump knew Jeffrey Epstein before she met Donald Trump and that Epstein, not Zampolli, was the person who introduced the couple. The allegations also point to a reported 2019 FBI proffer interview in which a former Epstein assistant allegedly said Epstein introduced Melania to Trump. The same material describes Epstein as being familiar with Zampolli’s modeling-agency world, including claims that Epstein visited the agency during casting activity and discussed acquiring Elite Models with Zampolli.<br /><br />The article also lays out the competing denials and credibility issues surrounding the allegation. Melania Trump has said she met Donald Trump by chance at a New York party in 1998, while Zampolli has denied Ungaro’s claims and maintained that he was the one who introduced them. Ungaro and Zampolli had documented connections to Trump’s orbit, including attendance at inauguration-related events and time at Mar-a-Lago, but Ungaro’s claims are presented alongside disputes over her credibility, including a custody battle, deportation to Brazil, and fraud-related legal problems. The result is a contested set of claims about the Epstein-Zampolli-Melania-Trump timeline, with the central allegations still unresolved.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/allegations-linking-melania-trump-jeffrey-epstein-1800225" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Former Brazilian Model Claims Melania Trump Was an 'Escort' for Jeffrey Epstein Before She Met Donald Trump | IBTimes UK</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>666</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Truth Commission Moves In: Epstein’s New Mexico Network Faces Subpoenas (6/3/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-truth-commission-moves-in-epstein-s-new-mexico-network-faces-subpoenas-6-3-26--72301584</link><description><![CDATA[New Mexico’s Epstein Survivors Truth Commission has issued its first major round of subpoenas as part of its investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s former Zorro Ranch, the sprawling property outside Santa Fe that has long been tied to allegations of abuse, trafficking, and institutional failure. The commission, created by New Mexico lawmakers in early 2026, is seeking records from more than a dozen entities, including federal agencies, state officials, law enforcement bodies, Deutsche Bank, the FBI, the governor’s office, and the Santa Fe Institute. The goal is to determine what happened at the ranch, who knew about it, what institutions enabled Epstein’s presence in New Mexico for decades, and why the property was never subjected to the same level of federal scrutiny as Epstein’s Manhattan mansion or his island in the Virgin Islands.<br /><br />The subpoenas mark a significant escalation because the New Mexico inquiry is not simply looking at Epstein as an isolated predator, but at the broader network around him: financial institutions, scientific circles, government offices, law enforcement agencies, and any public or private actors who may have helped create the conditions that allowed him to operate. The commission has heard testimony from survivors and relatives of victims, including testimony connected to Virginia Giuffre, and it is encouraging additional victims to come forward. The investigation also follows renewed searches of Zorro Ranch by New Mexico authorities earlier this year, using tools such as drones and cadaver dogs, after previously released Epstein records revived questions about possible crimes and overlooked allegations connected to the property. In plain terms: New Mexico is now trying to do what federal authorities never fully did—put Zorro Ranch under a microscope.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/01/politics/new-mexico-truth-commission-epstein-zorro-ranch-subpoenas" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">New Mexico ‘Truth Commission’ begins investigation into Epstein’s Zorro Ranch, will issue subpoenas | CNN Politics</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72301584</guid><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 18:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72301584/nmtruthcomissionsubpoenas.mp3" length="12851035" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a296c4ae-cb2c-4b03-84fd-c089f577fec0/a296c4ae-cb2c-4b03-84fd-c089f577fec0.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a296c4ae-cb2c-4b03-84fd-c089f577fec0/a296c4ae-cb2c-4b03-84fd-c089f577fec0.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a296c4ae-cb2c-4b03-84fd-c089f577fec0/a296c4ae-cb2c-4b03-84fd-c089f577fec0.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>New Mexico’s Epstein Survivors Truth Commission has issued its first major round of subpoenas as part of its investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s former Zorro Ranch, the sprawling property outside Santa Fe that has long been tied to allegations of...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[New Mexico’s Epstein Survivors Truth Commission has issued its first major round of subpoenas as part of its investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s former Zorro Ranch, the sprawling property outside Santa Fe that has long been tied to allegations of abuse, trafficking, and institutional failure. The commission, created by New Mexico lawmakers in early 2026, is seeking records from more than a dozen entities, including federal agencies, state officials, law enforcement bodies, Deutsche Bank, the FBI, the governor’s office, and the Santa Fe Institute. The goal is to determine what happened at the ranch, who knew about it, what institutions enabled Epstein’s presence in New Mexico for decades, and why the property was never subjected to the same level of federal scrutiny as Epstein’s Manhattan mansion or his island in the Virgin Islands.<br /><br />The subpoenas mark a significant escalation because the New Mexico inquiry is not simply looking at Epstein as an isolated predator, but at the broader network around him: financial institutions, scientific circles, government offices, law enforcement agencies, and any public or private actors who may have helped create the conditions that allowed him to operate. The commission has heard testimony from survivors and relatives of victims, including testimony connected to Virginia Giuffre, and it is encouraging additional victims to come forward. The investigation also follows renewed searches of Zorro Ranch by New Mexico authorities earlier this year, using tools such as drones and cadaver dogs, after previously released Epstein records revived questions about possible crimes and overlooked allegations connected to the property. In plain terms: New Mexico is now trying to do what federal authorities never fully did—put Zorro Ranch under a microscope.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/01/politics/new-mexico-truth-commission-epstein-zorro-ranch-subpoenas" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">New Mexico ‘Truth Commission’ begins investigation into Epstein’s Zorro Ranch, will issue subpoenas | CNN Politics</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>804</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Buckingham Palace Is Accused Of Being Part Of The On going Epstein Coverup (6/3/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/buckingham-palace-is-accused-of-being-part-of-the-on-going-epstein-coverup-6-3-26--72286478</link><description><![CDATA[Jess Michaels, a Jeffrey Epstein survivor, accused Buckingham Palace of helping shield Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor by failing to act on damaging material it reportedly received years earlier. The central issue is an archive of roughly 30,000 emails allegedly handed to the Palace’s Lord Chamberlain in May 2020, tied to Andrew’s work as a UK trade envoy and his dealings with powerful business figures. Those emails reportedly suggested Andrew may have shared sensitive or confidential government-related information, including material connected to his official role, and raised questions about whether the Palace had evidence of potential misconduct long before police action began.<br /><br />Michaels argued that the Palace’s alleged inaction fits a broader pattern of institutions protecting powerful men while survivors were ignored, doubted, or left to fight alone. Andrew, who has denied wrongdoing, was later arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office in connection with allegations that he passed sensitive information to Jeffrey Epstein, and Thames Valley Police are also assessing related claims involving possible sexual misconduct. The broader implication is that the scandal is no longer only about Andrew’s relationship with Epstein or Virginia Giuffre’s allegations, but about whether Buckingham Palace had information that should have triggered accountability years earlier and instead allowed the matter to remain buried.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbcapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/epstein-survivor-accuses-palace-of-cover-up/ar-AA24tGfW?cvid=6a1c304c92f74372b99fda5f33df4668&amp;ocid=U452DHP" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein survivor accuses palace of cover-up</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72286478</guid><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72286478/survivorpalacecoverup.mp3" length="10008912" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/79446947-f292-4ff9-9111-f7db41c5a30f/79446947-f292-4ff9-9111-f7db41c5a30f.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/79446947-f292-4ff9-9111-f7db41c5a30f/79446947-f292-4ff9-9111-f7db41c5a30f.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/79446947-f292-4ff9-9111-f7db41c5a30f/79446947-f292-4ff9-9111-f7db41c5a30f.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jess Michaels, a Jeffrey Epstein survivor, accused Buckingham Palace of helping shield Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor by failing to act on damaging material it reportedly received years earlier. The central issue is an archive of roughly 30,000 emails...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jess Michaels, a Jeffrey Epstein survivor, accused Buckingham Palace of helping shield Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor by failing to act on damaging material it reportedly received years earlier. The central issue is an archive of roughly 30,000 emails allegedly handed to the Palace’s Lord Chamberlain in May 2020, tied to Andrew’s work as a UK trade envoy and his dealings with powerful business figures. Those emails reportedly suggested Andrew may have shared sensitive or confidential government-related information, including material connected to his official role, and raised questions about whether the Palace had evidence of potential misconduct long before police action began.<br /><br />Michaels argued that the Palace’s alleged inaction fits a broader pattern of institutions protecting powerful men while survivors were ignored, doubted, or left to fight alone. Andrew, who has denied wrongdoing, was later arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office in connection with allegations that he passed sensitive information to Jeffrey Epstein, and Thames Valley Police are also assessing related claims involving possible sexual misconduct. The broader implication is that the scandal is no longer only about Andrew’s relationship with Epstein or Virginia Giuffre’s allegations, but about whether Buckingham Palace had information that should have triggered accountability years earlier and instead allowed the matter to remain buried.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbcapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/epstein-survivor-accuses-palace-of-cover-up/ar-AA24tGfW?cvid=6a1c304c92f74372b99fda5f33df4668&amp;ocid=U452DHP" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein survivor accuses palace of cover-up</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>626</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>James Fine, Karyna Shuliak, and Columbia Dental’s Epstein Problem (6/3/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/james-fine-karyna-shuliak-and-columbia-dental-s-epstein-problem-6-3-26--72301581</link><description><![CDATA[Dr. James Fine, a longtime Columbia College of Dental Medicine administrator, is set to leave his post after newly scrutinized records showed he twice helped Karyna Shuliak, Jeffrey Epstein’s former girlfriend, gain entry into Columbia dental programs. The first instance involved her admission into the dental school after she had initially been rejected, during a period when Epstein was being courted as a potential major donor. The second involved Fine later recommending Shuliak for a postdoctoral program. The controversy grew because Columbia had already taken action against other dental school figures tied to Epstein-related admissions and fundraising questions, while Fine had remained in place despite documents showing his role in both episodes.<br /><br />The deeper issue is not merely one administrator leaving a university job; it is the pattern of elite institutions bending, softening, or bypassing normal procedures when Jeffrey Epstein’s money, access, or influence entered the room. Columbia has said Shuliak herself has not been found responsible for wrongdoing, but the admissions trail raises serious questions about who inside the school helped Epstein, why normal standards appeared to shift, and why accountability arrived only after documents forced the issue into public view. Fine’s exit adds another name to the fallout, but it also reinforces the larger Epstein pattern: powerful institutions only seem to discover their ethical backbone after the emails, donations, and internal favors become impossible to ignore.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.columbiaspectator.com/main/2026/05/30/college-of-dental-medicine-administrator-who-twice-aided-epsteins-girlfriends-admission-to-exit-post/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">College of Dental Medicine administrator who twice aided Epstein’s girlfriend’s admission to exit post</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72301581</guid><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 14:35:39 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72301581/colombiauniversitydrfine.mp3" length="11335933" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/10e53cd7-4cc8-4a21-bb4a-cf75cf05d05b/10e53cd7-4cc8-4a21-bb4a-cf75cf05d05b.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/10e53cd7-4cc8-4a21-bb4a-cf75cf05d05b/10e53cd7-4cc8-4a21-bb4a-cf75cf05d05b.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/10e53cd7-4cc8-4a21-bb4a-cf75cf05d05b/10e53cd7-4cc8-4a21-bb4a-cf75cf05d05b.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Dr. James Fine, a longtime Columbia College of Dental Medicine administrator, is set to leave his post after newly scrutinized records showed he twice helped Karyna Shuliak, Jeffrey Epstein’s former girlfriend, gain entry into Columbia dental...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Dr. James Fine, a longtime Columbia College of Dental Medicine administrator, is set to leave his post after newly scrutinized records showed he twice helped Karyna Shuliak, Jeffrey Epstein’s former girlfriend, gain entry into Columbia dental programs. The first instance involved her admission into the dental school after she had initially been rejected, during a period when Epstein was being courted as a potential major donor. The second involved Fine later recommending Shuliak for a postdoctoral program. The controversy grew because Columbia had already taken action against other dental school figures tied to Epstein-related admissions and fundraising questions, while Fine had remained in place despite documents showing his role in both episodes.<br /><br />The deeper issue is not merely one administrator leaving a university job; it is the pattern of elite institutions bending, softening, or bypassing normal procedures when Jeffrey Epstein’s money, access, or influence entered the room. Columbia has said Shuliak herself has not been found responsible for wrongdoing, but the admissions trail raises serious questions about who inside the school helped Epstein, why normal standards appeared to shift, and why accountability arrived only after documents forced the issue into public view. Fine’s exit adds another name to the fallout, but it also reinforces the larger Epstein pattern: powerful institutions only seem to discover their ethical backbone after the emails, donations, and internal favors become impossible to ignore.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.columbiaspectator.com/main/2026/05/30/college-of-dental-medicine-administrator-who-twice-aided-epsteins-girlfriends-admission-to-exit-post/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">College of Dental Medicine administrator who twice aided Epstein’s girlfriend’s admission to exit post</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>709</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Captain Of Security Operations At MCC And His OIG Deposition (Part 6) (6/3/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-captain-of-security-operations-at-mcc-and-his-oig-deposition-part-6-6-3-26--72301593</link><description><![CDATA[The document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s death. The captain described the command structure inside the jail, including his role supervising lieutenants and reporting up to associate wardens or the warden, while investigators walked him through staffing, rosters, post assignments, suicide-watch procedures, SHU operations, and the chain of responsibility on August 9–10, 2019. The transcript is important because it does not present Epstein’s death as a clean, orderly institutional event; instead, it shows a jail struggling with bad staffing, confusing handoffs, unfilled posts, questionable paperwork, and a command structure where critical responsibilities appear to have been either missed, misunderstood, or passed around.<br /><br /><br />The most serious value of the interview is in the irregularities it surfaces. The captain reportedly discussed inaccurate rosters or logs, acknowledged questions around skipped SHU rounds, addressed the fact that Epstein had previously been on suicide watch, and said he would not necessarily have known in real time if officers were failing to conduct required checks. Even more troubling, he expressed concern that certain documents may have been deliberately removed from files that should have been reviewed or audited, and investigators also raised an inmate-count issue involving an inmate named Reyes, whose release may not have been properly reflected in the institution’s count — something the captain treated as a protocol violation. Taken together, the transcript adds another layer to the larger Epstein death record: not a single clean explanation, but a bureaucratic mess of missing or questionable documentation, staffing failures, broken supervision, and institutional chaos at precisely the moment when the most high-profile federal inmate in America was supposed to be under careful control.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00111830.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00111830.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72301593</guid><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72301593/dardenoig6.mp3" length="11128207" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d0548f91-8c71-4c72-8991-0cd7b3d2e281/d0548f91-8c71-4c72-8991-0cd7b3d2e281.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d0548f91-8c71-4c72-8991-0cd7b3d2e281/d0548f91-8c71-4c72-8991-0cd7b3d2e281.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d0548f91-8c71-4c72-8991-0cd7b3d2e281/d0548f91-8c71-4c72-8991-0cd7b3d2e281.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s death. The captain described the command...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s death. The captain described the command structure inside the jail, including his role supervising lieutenants and reporting up to associate wardens or the warden, while investigators walked him through staffing, rosters, post assignments, suicide-watch procedures, SHU operations, and the chain of responsibility on August 9–10, 2019. The transcript is important because it does not present Epstein’s death as a clean, orderly institutional event; instead, it shows a jail struggling with bad staffing, confusing handoffs, unfilled posts, questionable paperwork, and a command structure where critical responsibilities appear to have been either missed, misunderstood, or passed around.<br /><br /><br />The most serious value of the interview is in the irregularities it surfaces. The captain reportedly discussed inaccurate rosters or logs, acknowledged questions around skipped SHU rounds, addressed the fact that Epstein had previously been on suicide watch, and said he would not necessarily have known in real time if officers were failing to conduct required checks. Even more troubling, he expressed concern that certain documents may have been deliberately removed from files that should have been reviewed or audited, and investigators also raised an inmate-count issue involving an inmate named Reyes, whose release may not have been properly reflected in the institution’s count — something the captain treated as a protocol violation. Taken together, the transcript adds another layer to the larger Epstein death record: not a single clean explanation, but a bureaucratic mess of missing or questionable documentation, staffing failures, broken supervision, and institutional chaos at precisely the moment when the most high-profile federal inmate in America was supposed to be under careful control.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00111830.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00111830.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>696</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Jeffrey Epstein's Survivors And Their Long Battle For The Accountability (6/3/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-s-survivors-and-their-long-battle-for-the-accountability-6-3-26--72298918</link><description><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein’s survivors have been pursuing justice for decades because the system failed them at almost every major point where it was supposed to act. Many of the earliest allegations against Epstein surfaced in the mid-2000s in Palm Beach, where police identified a pattern involving underage girls being recruited, paid, and brought to Epstein’s mansion, yet the federal non-prosecution agreement that followed in 2007–2008 allowed Epstein to avoid the kind of full federal prosecution that could have exposed the larger network much earlier. That deal did not just spare Epstein from meaningful accountability; it also left survivors blindsided, minimized, and treated as obstacles instead of crime victims with rights. For years afterward, they had to fight through civil suits, public smearing, sealed records, institutional silence, and the protection Epstein received from wealth, lawyers, social connections, and powerful friends. Their pursuit of justice became less like a case and more like a long war against a machine built to delay, contain, and bury what happened.<br /><br />Even after Epstein’s 2019 arrest and death, the survivors’ fight did not end, because death removed the central defendant but not the questions, the enablers, the institutions, or the damage. They continued pressing through the Crime Victims’ Rights Act litigation, civil claims against Epstein’s estate, lawsuits and settlements involving banks and institutions accused of enabling him, testimony before Congress, demands for document releases, and ongoing calls for accountability for those who allegedly helped him operate. Ghislaine Maxwell’s conviction was one major courtroom victory, but it did not answer the larger question survivors have been asking since the beginning: how did Epstein keep getting protected, funded, housed, introduced, excused, and rehabilitated after so many warnings? That is why their pursuit of justice has lasted so long. They are not simply asking for one conviction or one settlement; they are demanding a full accounting of the ecosystem that allowed Epstein to abuse girls, escape real punishment, and remain insulated for decades.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72298918</guid><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72298918/megaepsteinsurvivorspursuitjustice.mp3" length="47800782" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/697a9315-f02d-42ed-be77-8a9cd82f5849/697a9315-f02d-42ed-be77-8a9cd82f5849.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/697a9315-f02d-42ed-be77-8a9cd82f5849/697a9315-f02d-42ed-be77-8a9cd82f5849.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/697a9315-f02d-42ed-be77-8a9cd82f5849/697a9315-f02d-42ed-be77-8a9cd82f5849.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jeffrey Epstein’s survivors have been pursuing justice for decades because the system failed them at almost every major point where it was supposed to act. Many of the earliest allegations against Epstein surfaced in the mid-2000s in Palm Beach, where...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein’s survivors have been pursuing justice for decades because the system failed them at almost every major point where it was supposed to act. Many of the earliest allegations against Epstein surfaced in the mid-2000s in Palm Beach, where police identified a pattern involving underage girls being recruited, paid, and brought to Epstein’s mansion, yet the federal non-prosecution agreement that followed in 2007–2008 allowed Epstein to avoid the kind of full federal prosecution that could have exposed the larger network much earlier. That deal did not just spare Epstein from meaningful accountability; it also left survivors blindsided, minimized, and treated as obstacles instead of crime victims with rights. For years afterward, they had to fight through civil suits, public smearing, sealed records, institutional silence, and the protection Epstein received from wealth, lawyers, social connections, and powerful friends. Their pursuit of justice became less like a case and more like a long war against a machine built to delay, contain, and bury what happened.<br /><br />Even after Epstein’s 2019 arrest and death, the survivors’ fight did not end, because death removed the central defendant but not the questions, the enablers, the institutions, or the damage. They continued pressing through the Crime Victims’ Rights Act litigation, civil claims against Epstein’s estate, lawsuits and settlements involving banks and institutions accused of enabling him, testimony before Congress, demands for document releases, and ongoing calls for accountability for those who allegedly helped him operate. Ghislaine Maxwell’s conviction was one major courtroom victory, but it did not answer the larger question survivors have been asking since the beginning: how did Epstein keep getting protected, funded, housed, introduced, excused, and rehabilitated after so many warnings? That is why their pursuit of justice has lasted so long. They are not simply asking for one conviction or one settlement; they are demanding a full accounting of the ecosystem that allowed Epstein to abuse girls, escape real punishment, and remain insulated for decades.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2988</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Ian Maxwell Had Some Very Interesting Comments About Epstein's Death (6/326)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-ian-maxwell-had-some-very-interesting-comments-about-epstein-s-death-6-326--72263672</link><description><![CDATA[Ian Maxwell’s BBC interview was controversial because it gave Ghislaine Maxwell’s brother a national platform immediately after her conviction to argue that she remained innocent, that the case against her was flawed, and that her defense had been crippled by the conditions of her confinement before trial. He portrayed the appeal as centered on claims that she had been unable to properly prepare, while also echoing defense arguments that challenged the credibility and motives of the women who testified. The backlash was predictable: Ghislaine had just been convicted of recruiting and grooming teenage girls for Jeffrey Epstein to abuse, and many critics saw the interview as yet another example of the Maxwell family trying to reframe a trafficking conviction as a story about unfair treatment rather than about the victims and the evidence.<br /><br />On Epstein’s death, Ian Maxwell has been tied to the broader Maxwell-family skepticism around the official suicide finding, saying or suggesting that Ghislaine herself did not believe Epstein killed himself. That view later lined up with Ghislaine Maxwell’s own statements in released Justice Department interviews, where she said she did not believe Epstein died by suicide but also rejected the more sweeping theory that powerful outsiders had him killed to protect blackmail secrets. Her version was narrower: if Epstein was murdered, she suggested it was more likely an “internal” prison situation involving corruption, inmate violence, or catastrophic jail mismanagement. The key point is that the Maxwell camp’s position does not cleanly endorse every Epstein murder theory; it casts doubt on the official suicide conclusion while also trying to steer suspicion away from the elite network around Epstein and toward the broken, filthy machinery of the federal jail where he died.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72263672</guid><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72263672/megaianmaxwellthoughtsepsteinsdeath.mp3" length="50172700" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8ad0af02-9a1a-45ca-abaa-8878c16a27de/8ad0af02-9a1a-45ca-abaa-8878c16a27de.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8ad0af02-9a1a-45ca-abaa-8878c16a27de/8ad0af02-9a1a-45ca-abaa-8878c16a27de.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8ad0af02-9a1a-45ca-abaa-8878c16a27de/8ad0af02-9a1a-45ca-abaa-8878c16a27de.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Ian Maxwell’s BBC interview was controversial because it gave Ghislaine Maxwell’s brother a national platform immediately after her conviction to argue that she remained innocent, that the case against her was flawed, and that her defense had been...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Ian Maxwell’s BBC interview was controversial because it gave Ghislaine Maxwell’s brother a national platform immediately after her conviction to argue that she remained innocent, that the case against her was flawed, and that her defense had been crippled by the conditions of her confinement before trial. He portrayed the appeal as centered on claims that she had been unable to properly prepare, while also echoing defense arguments that challenged the credibility and motives of the women who testified. The backlash was predictable: Ghislaine had just been convicted of recruiting and grooming teenage girls for Jeffrey Epstein to abuse, and many critics saw the interview as yet another example of the Maxwell family trying to reframe a trafficking conviction as a story about unfair treatment rather than about the victims and the evidence.<br /><br />On Epstein’s death, Ian Maxwell has been tied to the broader Maxwell-family skepticism around the official suicide finding, saying or suggesting that Ghislaine herself did not believe Epstein killed himself. That view later lined up with Ghislaine Maxwell’s own statements in released Justice Department interviews, where she said she did not believe Epstein died by suicide but also rejected the more sweeping theory that powerful outsiders had him killed to protect blackmail secrets. Her version was narrower: if Epstein was murdered, she suggested it was more likely an “internal” prison situation involving corruption, inmate violence, or catastrophic jail mismanagement. The key point is that the Maxwell camp’s position does not cleanly endorse every Epstein murder theory; it casts doubt on the official suicide conclusion while also trying to steer suspicion away from the elite network around Epstein and toward the broken, filthy machinery of the federal jail where he died.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3136</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Ghislaine Maxwell And Her Go No Where Mission To Free Herself From Prison (6/2/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-ghislaine-maxwell-and-her-go-no-where-mission-to-free-herself-from-prison-6-2-26--72298917</link><description><![CDATA[Ghislaine Maxwell has spent the years since her conviction trying to unwind the result of the case from almost every available angle, and the courts have rejected her at each major stop. After a federal jury convicted her in December 2021 for helping Jeffrey Epstein recruit, groom, and traffic underage girls, she was sentenced in June 2022 to 20 years in prison. Her first big post-trial effort centered on the juror issue, after a juror revealed publicly that he had discussed his own history of sexual abuse during deliberations despite not disclosing it properly during jury selection. Maxwell argued that this deprived her of a fair trial and warranted a new one, but the trial judge rejected that claim. She also attacked the indictment, the statute of limitations, the jury instructions, the sufficiency of the prosecution theory, and the fairness of the sentence itself. None of it worked.<br /><br />Her biggest appellate argument was that Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Florida non-prosecution agreement should have protected her too, because the deal included language about “potential co-conspirators.” The Second Circuit rejected that argument in September 2024, holding that the Florida agreement did not bind federal prosecutors in New York, and it also upheld her conviction and 20-year sentence across the board. Maxwell then took the fight to the Supreme Court, but the Court declined to hear the case in October 2025, leaving the conviction and sentence intact. Since exhausting her direct appeals, she has turned to habeas-style filings and renewed efforts to vacate the conviction, including a 2026 submission after the Justice Department released additional Epstein-related material, but that is not a successful appeal — it is another long-shot attempt after every major direct challenge already failed. The bottom line is simple: Maxwell has kept trying to reopen the case, but the courts have repeatedly told her no, and her 20-year sentence remains in place.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72298917</guid><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 06:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72298917/megamaxwellmanyattempsappeal.mp3" length="49072631" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6c9fb8ed-2acd-4ff6-940b-14062a8395f6/6c9fb8ed-2acd-4ff6-940b-14062a8395f6.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6c9fb8ed-2acd-4ff6-940b-14062a8395f6/6c9fb8ed-2acd-4ff6-940b-14062a8395f6.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6c9fb8ed-2acd-4ff6-940b-14062a8395f6/6c9fb8ed-2acd-4ff6-940b-14062a8395f6.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Ghislaine Maxwell has spent the years since her conviction trying to unwind the result of the case from almost every available angle, and the courts have rejected her at each major stop. After a federal jury convicted her in December 2021 for helping...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Ghislaine Maxwell has spent the years since her conviction trying to unwind the result of the case from almost every available angle, and the courts have rejected her at each major stop. After a federal jury convicted her in December 2021 for helping Jeffrey Epstein recruit, groom, and traffic underage girls, she was sentenced in June 2022 to 20 years in prison. Her first big post-trial effort centered on the juror issue, after a juror revealed publicly that he had discussed his own history of sexual abuse during deliberations despite not disclosing it properly during jury selection. Maxwell argued that this deprived her of a fair trial and warranted a new one, but the trial judge rejected that claim. She also attacked the indictment, the statute of limitations, the jury instructions, the sufficiency of the prosecution theory, and the fairness of the sentence itself. None of it worked.<br /><br />Her biggest appellate argument was that Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Florida non-prosecution agreement should have protected her too, because the deal included language about “potential co-conspirators.” The Second Circuit rejected that argument in September 2024, holding that the Florida agreement did not bind federal prosecutors in New York, and it also upheld her conviction and 20-year sentence across the board. Maxwell then took the fight to the Supreme Court, but the Court declined to hear the case in October 2025, leaving the conviction and sentence intact. Since exhausting her direct appeals, she has turned to habeas-style filings and renewed efforts to vacate the conviction, including a 2026 submission after the Justice Department released additional Epstein-related material, but that is not a successful appeal — it is another long-shot attempt after every major direct challenge already failed. The bottom line is simple: Maxwell has kept trying to reopen the case, but the courts have repeatedly told her no, and her 20-year sentence remains in place.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3068</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Virginia Robert's Repsonds To Ghislaine Maxwell's "Undisputed Facts" (Part 7)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/virginia-robert-s-repsonds-to-ghislaine-maxwell-s-undisputed-facts-part-7--72227868</link><description><![CDATA[In response to Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 56.1 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, Virginia Giuffre (formerly known as Virginia Roberts) submitted a detailed counterstatement challenging Maxwell's assertions. Giuffre disputed Maxwell's denials of involvement in Jeffrey Epstein's alleged sexual abuse and trafficking operations, providing specific instances and evidence to support her claims. She contended that Maxwell's public statements dismissing her allegations as false were themselves defamatory and aimed at discrediting her experiences as a victim. Giuffre's response emphasized the existence of genuine disputes over material facts, arguing that these issues necessitated a trial to resolve the conflicting accounts.<br /><br />Giuffre's counterstatement also highlighted inconsistencies and omissions in Maxwell's narrative, aiming to demonstrate that Maxwell's involvement with Epstein was more extensive than acknowledged. By presenting corroborative testimonies and documentary evidence, Giuffre sought to undermine Maxwell's credibility and reinforce the legitimacy of her own allegations<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72227868</guid><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72227868/virgrespfact7.mp3" length="12456899" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/37940f46-25b0-4211-826c-b3958cbdd5c8/37940f46-25b0-4211-826c-b3958cbdd5c8.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/37940f46-25b0-4211-826c-b3958cbdd5c8/37940f46-25b0-4211-826c-b3958cbdd5c8.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/37940f46-25b0-4211-826c-b3958cbdd5c8/37940f46-25b0-4211-826c-b3958cbdd5c8.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In response to Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 56.1 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, Virginia Giuffre (formerly known as Virginia Roberts) submitted a detailed counterstatement challenging Maxwell's assertions. Giuffre disputed Maxwell's denials of...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In response to Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 56.1 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, Virginia Giuffre (formerly known as Virginia Roberts) submitted a detailed counterstatement challenging Maxwell's assertions. Giuffre disputed Maxwell's denials of involvement in Jeffrey Epstein's alleged sexual abuse and trafficking operations, providing specific instances and evidence to support her claims. She contended that Maxwell's public statements dismissing her allegations as false were themselves defamatory and aimed at discrediting her experiences as a victim. Giuffre's response emphasized the existence of genuine disputes over material facts, arguing that these issues necessitated a trial to resolve the conflicting accounts.<br /><br />Giuffre's counterstatement also highlighted inconsistencies and omissions in Maxwell's narrative, aiming to demonstrate that Maxwell's involvement with Epstein was more extensive than acknowledged. By presenting corroborative testimonies and documentary evidence, Giuffre sought to undermine Maxwell's credibility and reinforce the legitimacy of her own allegations<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>779</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Virginia Robert's Repsonds To Ghislaine Maxwell's "Undisputed Facts" (Part 6)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/virginia-robert-s-repsonds-to-ghislaine-maxwell-s-undisputed-facts-part-6--72227863</link><description><![CDATA[In response to Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 56.1 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, Virginia Giuffre (formerly known as Virginia Roberts) submitted a detailed counterstatement challenging Maxwell's assertions. Giuffre disputed Maxwell's denials of involvement in Jeffrey Epstein's alleged sexual abuse and trafficking operations, providing specific instances and evidence to support her claims. She contended that Maxwell's public statements dismissing her allegations as false were themselves defamatory and aimed at discrediting her experiences as a victim. Giuffre's response emphasized the existence of genuine disputes over material facts, arguing that these issues necessitated a trial to resolve the conflicting accounts.<br /><br />Giuffre's counterstatement also highlighted inconsistencies and omissions in Maxwell's narrative, aiming to demonstrate that Maxwell's involvement with Epstein was more extensive than acknowledged. By presenting corroborative testimonies and documentary evidence, Giuffre sought to undermine Maxwell's credibility and reinforce the legitimacy of her own allegations<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72227863</guid><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72227863/virgrespfact6.mp3" length="11261118" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e80b2fc8-3a5c-4ce4-8235-f34e04c6021f/e80b2fc8-3a5c-4ce4-8235-f34e04c6021f.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e80b2fc8-3a5c-4ce4-8235-f34e04c6021f/e80b2fc8-3a5c-4ce4-8235-f34e04c6021f.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e80b2fc8-3a5c-4ce4-8235-f34e04c6021f/e80b2fc8-3a5c-4ce4-8235-f34e04c6021f.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In response to Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 56.1 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, Virginia Giuffre (formerly known as Virginia Roberts) submitted a detailed counterstatement challenging Maxwell's assertions. Giuffre disputed Maxwell's denials of...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In response to Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 56.1 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, Virginia Giuffre (formerly known as Virginia Roberts) submitted a detailed counterstatement challenging Maxwell's assertions. Giuffre disputed Maxwell's denials of involvement in Jeffrey Epstein's alleged sexual abuse and trafficking operations, providing specific instances and evidence to support her claims. She contended that Maxwell's public statements dismissing her allegations as false were themselves defamatory and aimed at discrediting her experiences as a victim. Giuffre's response emphasized the existence of genuine disputes over material facts, arguing that these issues necessitated a trial to resolve the conflicting accounts.<br /><br />Giuffre's counterstatement also highlighted inconsistencies and omissions in Maxwell's narrative, aiming to demonstrate that Maxwell's involvement with Epstein was more extensive than acknowledged. By presenting corroborative testimonies and documentary evidence, Giuffre sought to undermine Maxwell's credibility and reinforce the legitimacy of her own allegations<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>704</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Virginia Robert's Repsonds To Ghislaine Maxwell's "Undisputed Facts" (Part 5)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/virginia-robert-s-repsonds-to-ghislaine-maxwell-s-undisputed-facts-part-5--72227869</link><description><![CDATA[In response to Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 56.1 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, Virginia Giuffre (formerly known as Virginia Roberts) submitted a detailed counterstatement challenging Maxwell's assertions. Giuffre disputed Maxwell's denials of involvement in Jeffrey Epstein's alleged sexual abuse and trafficking operations, providing specific instances and evidence to support her claims. She contended that Maxwell's public statements dismissing her allegations as false were themselves defamatory and aimed at discrediting her experiences as a victim. Giuffre's response emphasized the existence of genuine disputes over material facts, arguing that these issues necessitated a trial to resolve the conflicting accounts.<br /><br />Giuffre's counterstatement also highlighted inconsistencies and omissions in Maxwell's narrative, aiming to demonstrate that Maxwell's involvement with Epstein was more extensive than acknowledged. By presenting corroborative testimonies and documentary evidence, Giuffre sought to undermine Maxwell's credibility and reinforce the legitimacy of her own allegations<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72227869</guid><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 00:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72227869/virgrespfact5.mp3" length="13139426" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a0dc3a80-566e-42e1-8049-94d9f35e5b43/a0dc3a80-566e-42e1-8049-94d9f35e5b43.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a0dc3a80-566e-42e1-8049-94d9f35e5b43/a0dc3a80-566e-42e1-8049-94d9f35e5b43.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a0dc3a80-566e-42e1-8049-94d9f35e5b43/a0dc3a80-566e-42e1-8049-94d9f35e5b43.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In response to Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 56.1 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, Virginia Giuffre (formerly known as Virginia Roberts) submitted a detailed counterstatement challenging Maxwell's assertions. Giuffre disputed Maxwell's denials of...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In response to Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 56.1 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, Virginia Giuffre (formerly known as Virginia Roberts) submitted a detailed counterstatement challenging Maxwell's assertions. Giuffre disputed Maxwell's denials of involvement in Jeffrey Epstein's alleged sexual abuse and trafficking operations, providing specific instances and evidence to support her claims. She contended that Maxwell's public statements dismissing her allegations as false were themselves defamatory and aimed at discrediting her experiences as a victim. Giuffre's response emphasized the existence of genuine disputes over material facts, arguing that these issues necessitated a trial to resolve the conflicting accounts.<br /><br />Giuffre's counterstatement also highlighted inconsistencies and omissions in Maxwell's narrative, aiming to demonstrate that Maxwell's involvement with Epstein was more extensive than acknowledged. By presenting corroborative testimonies and documentary evidence, Giuffre sought to undermine Maxwell's credibility and reinforce the legitimacy of her own allegations<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>822</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Virginia Robert's Repsonds To Ghislaine Maxwell's "Undisputed Facts" (Part 4)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/virginia-robert-s-repsonds-to-ghislaine-maxwell-s-undisputed-facts-part-4--72227865</link><description><![CDATA[In response to Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 56.1 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, Virginia Giuffre (formerly known as Virginia Roberts) submitted a detailed counterstatement challenging Maxwell's assertions. Giuffre disputed Maxwell's denials of involvement in Jeffrey Epstein's alleged sexual abuse and trafficking operations, providing specific instances and evidence to support her claims. She contended that Maxwell's public statements dismissing her allegations as false were themselves defamatory and aimed at discrediting her experiences as a victim. Giuffre's response emphasized the existence of genuine disputes over material facts, arguing that these issues necessitated a trial to resolve the conflicting accounts.<br /><br />Giuffre's counterstatement also highlighted inconsistencies and omissions in Maxwell's narrative, aiming to demonstrate that Maxwell's involvement with Epstein was more extensive than acknowledged. By presenting corroborative testimonies and documentary evidence, Giuffre sought to undermine Maxwell's credibility and reinforce the legitimacy of her own allegations<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72227865</guid><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72227865/virgrespfact4.mp3" length="12506218" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ac872332-bc77-4c54-a280-75f275d9f275/ac872332-bc77-4c54-a280-75f275d9f275.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ac872332-bc77-4c54-a280-75f275d9f275/ac872332-bc77-4c54-a280-75f275d9f275.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ac872332-bc77-4c54-a280-75f275d9f275/ac872332-bc77-4c54-a280-75f275d9f275.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In response to Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 56.1 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, Virginia Giuffre (formerly known as Virginia Roberts) submitted a detailed counterstatement challenging Maxwell's assertions. Giuffre disputed Maxwell's denials of...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In response to Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 56.1 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, Virginia Giuffre (formerly known as Virginia Roberts) submitted a detailed counterstatement challenging Maxwell's assertions. Giuffre disputed Maxwell's denials of involvement in Jeffrey Epstein's alleged sexual abuse and trafficking operations, providing specific instances and evidence to support her claims. She contended that Maxwell's public statements dismissing her allegations as false were themselves defamatory and aimed at discrediting her experiences as a victim. Giuffre's response emphasized the existence of genuine disputes over material facts, arguing that these issues necessitated a trial to resolve the conflicting accounts.<br /><br />Giuffre's counterstatement also highlighted inconsistencies and omissions in Maxwell's narrative, aiming to demonstrate that Maxwell's involvement with Epstein was more extensive than acknowledged. By presenting corroborative testimonies and documentary evidence, Giuffre sought to undermine Maxwell's credibility and reinforce the legitimacy of her own allegations<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>782</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>More Peter Mandelson Files On The Way And Epstein's Alleged DNA Vault (6/2/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/more-peter-mandelson-files-on-the-way-and-epstein-s-alleged-dna-vault-6-2-26--72286472</link><description><![CDATA[The second batch of documents tied to Lord Peter Mandelson’s appointment as the UK ambassador to the United States is set to be published, with officials describing it as one of the largest document releases ever laid before Parliament. The files relate to the controversy over Mandelson’s appointment, his vetting process, and the fallout from revelations about the extent of his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, which ultimately led to his removal from the ambassadorial post. The release is expected to include a large volume of communications and government material, though some sensitive vetting documents may be withheld or redacted because of an ongoing Metropolitan Police investigation into alleged misconduct in public office. The broader issue is politically damaging for Keir Starmer’s government because it raises questions about what officials knew, when they knew it, how Mandelson was cleared for such a high-profile diplomatic role, and whether the government was fully transparent about the risks surrounding his Epstein ties.<br /><br />Newly released Epstein-related files reportedly show another strange layer of his obsession with genetics, DNA, reproduction, and personal legacy, including references to sperm banking, genetic testing, and alleged efforts to preserve or extend his biological footprint even after death. The material fits into a broader pattern already associated with Epstein: his documented fascination with eugenics, transhumanism, elite scientific circles, and the idea of using wealth and access to embed himself inside worlds of medicine, genetics, academia, and power. The new information is unsettling not only because of what it suggests about Epstein’s private ambitions, but because it raises more questions about who knew about these interests, who helped facilitate them, whether any institutions enabled him after his conviction, and why so many pieces of his operation remain hidden, redacted, or only partially understood years after his death.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c98r664g865o" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Second batch of Mandelson files to be published on Monday</a><br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.rawstory.com/jeffrey-epstein-dna-new-info/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein's dark dream of spreading his DNA may outlive him: new files - Raw Story</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72286472</guid><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 20:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72286472/mandelsonsecondbatchepsteinsperm.mp3" length="12868589" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7200996f-e30a-43a6-86ad-bd1287fffb3a/7200996f-e30a-43a6-86ad-bd1287fffb3a.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7200996f-e30a-43a6-86ad-bd1287fffb3a/7200996f-e30a-43a6-86ad-bd1287fffb3a.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7200996f-e30a-43a6-86ad-bd1287fffb3a/7200996f-e30a-43a6-86ad-bd1287fffb3a.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The second batch of documents tied to Lord Peter Mandelson’s appointment as the UK ambassador to the United States is set to be published, with officials describing it as one of the largest document releases ever laid before Parliament. The files...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The second batch of documents tied to Lord Peter Mandelson’s appointment as the UK ambassador to the United States is set to be published, with officials describing it as one of the largest document releases ever laid before Parliament. The files relate to the controversy over Mandelson’s appointment, his vetting process, and the fallout from revelations about the extent of his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, which ultimately led to his removal from the ambassadorial post. The release is expected to include a large volume of communications and government material, though some sensitive vetting documents may be withheld or redacted because of an ongoing Metropolitan Police investigation into alleged misconduct in public office. The broader issue is politically damaging for Keir Starmer’s government because it raises questions about what officials knew, when they knew it, how Mandelson was cleared for such a high-profile diplomatic role, and whether the government was fully transparent about the risks surrounding his Epstein ties.<br /><br />Newly released Epstein-related files reportedly show another strange layer of his obsession with genetics, DNA, reproduction, and personal legacy, including references to sperm banking, genetic testing, and alleged efforts to preserve or extend his biological footprint even after death. The material fits into a broader pattern already associated with Epstein: his documented fascination with eugenics, transhumanism, elite scientific circles, and the idea of using wealth and access to embed himself inside worlds of medicine, genetics, academia, and power. The new information is unsettling not only because of what it suggests about Epstein’s private ambitions, but because it raises more questions about who knew about these interests, who helped facilitate them, whether any institutions enabled him after his conviction, and why so many pieces of his operation remain hidden, redacted, or only partially understood years after his death.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c98r664g865o" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Second batch of Mandelson files to be published on Monday</a><br /><br /><br /><a href="https://www.rawstory.com/jeffrey-epstein-dna-new-info/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein's dark dream of spreading his DNA may outlive him: new files - Raw Story</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>805</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Buckingham Palace and the Six-Year Silence Over Andrew’s Trade Envoy Emails (6/2/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/buckingham-palace-and-the-six-year-silence-over-andrew-s-trade-envoy-emails-6-2-26--72286479</link><description><![CDATA[Emails reportedly handed to Buckingham Palace in 2020 appeared to show that Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor shared confidential government information while serving as a UK trade envoy. According to the report, the cache contained more than 30,000 emails, allegedly from the account of British businessman Jonathan Rowland, an associate of Andrew’s, and included material connected to Andrew’s financial dealings. The emails were reportedly sent to the Lord Chamberlain six years ago, months after Andrew stepped back from royal duties following his disastrous Newsnight interview over his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Andrew was later arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office over allegations that he passed sensitive government information to Epstein while working as a trade envoy; he denies wrongdoing.<br /><br /><br />The most damaging part is the timeline: if these emails were already in Palace hands in 2020, then the question becomes what Buckingham Palace knew, what it did with that information, and whether serious concerns about Andrew’s trade envoy conduct were allowed to sit quietly for years. The report also ties the emails to earlier claims that Andrew requested confidential Treasury information about Iceland’s financial crisis in 2010 and then passed details to Jonathan Rowland before a business move involving Kaupthing Bank. With police inquiries still ongoing, the Palace declined to comment, citing the investigation, but the story adds another layer to the broader Andrew scandal: Epstein was not the only issue — the allegations now reach into Andrew’s official government role, his business contacts, and the possibility that warning signs were sitting inside the royal household years before public accountability caught up.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/may/30/palace-was-given-emails-about-andrews-trade-envoy-activities-six-years-ago-report-says" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Palace was given emails about Andrew’s trade envoy activities six years ago, report says | UK news | The Guardian</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72286479</guid><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 18:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72286479/palaceandrewemails.mp3" length="11121102" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4fece849-9c5d-4089-8728-7514b36c72a5/4fece849-9c5d-4089-8728-7514b36c72a5.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4fece849-9c5d-4089-8728-7514b36c72a5/4fece849-9c5d-4089-8728-7514b36c72a5.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4fece849-9c5d-4089-8728-7514b36c72a5/4fece849-9c5d-4089-8728-7514b36c72a5.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Emails reportedly handed to Buckingham Palace in 2020 appeared to show that Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor shared confidential government information while serving as a UK trade envoy. According to the report, the cache contained more than 30,000 emails,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Emails reportedly handed to Buckingham Palace in 2020 appeared to show that Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor shared confidential government information while serving as a UK trade envoy. According to the report, the cache contained more than 30,000 emails, allegedly from the account of British businessman Jonathan Rowland, an associate of Andrew’s, and included material connected to Andrew’s financial dealings. The emails were reportedly sent to the Lord Chamberlain six years ago, months after Andrew stepped back from royal duties following his disastrous Newsnight interview over his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Andrew was later arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office over allegations that he passed sensitive government information to Epstein while working as a trade envoy; he denies wrongdoing.<br /><br /><br />The most damaging part is the timeline: if these emails were already in Palace hands in 2020, then the question becomes what Buckingham Palace knew, what it did with that information, and whether serious concerns about Andrew’s trade envoy conduct were allowed to sit quietly for years. The report also ties the emails to earlier claims that Andrew requested confidential Treasury information about Iceland’s financial crisis in 2010 and then passed details to Jonathan Rowland before a business move involving Kaupthing Bank. With police inquiries still ongoing, the Palace declined to comment, citing the investigation, but the story adds another layer to the broader Andrew scandal: Epstein was not the only issue — the allegations now reach into Andrew’s official government role, his business contacts, and the possibility that warning signs were sitting inside the royal household years before public accountability caught up.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/may/30/palace-was-given-emails-about-andrews-trade-envoy-activities-six-years-ago-report-says" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Palace was given emails about Andrew’s trade envoy activities six years ago, report says | UK news | The Guardian</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>696</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Political Weaponization of the Epstein Scandal (6/2/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-political-weaponization-of-the-epstein-scandal-6-2-26--72286473</link><description><![CDATA[The Jeffrey Epstein scandal is political because it exposes the intersection of power, money, elite access, prosecutorial failure, institutional protection, and government decision-making. But that does not mean it should be handed over to partisan opportunists who use the horror of the case as a weapon against their enemies while ignoring anything that implicates their own side. Too many bad actors have turned Epstein into a tribal scoreboard, cherry-picking facts, inflating weak claims, burying inconvenient truths, and using survivor trauma as fuel for engagement, revenue, and personal branding. In the process, they have damaged the pursuit of justice by spreading confusion, weakening legitimate scrutiny, and giving powerful institutions an excuse to dismiss serious questions as partisan noise or conspiracy theater.<br /><br />At the center of this scandal are survivors who were failed by institutions that should have protected them, and they should never be reduced to props in a political content machine. Real accountability requires scrutinizing prosecutors, agencies, financial institutions, universities, media outlets, politicians, and elite social networks without fear, favoritism, or party loyalty. The people monetizing outrage while doing little to advance truth are helping divide the public and protect the same systems they claim to oppose. The only path forward is disciplined attention to evidence, court records, survivor statements, and institutional failures — not factional warfare, algorithmic rage, or cowardly loyalty to political teams.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72286473</guid><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72286473/epsteinscandalpoliticsgrift.mp3" length="16840037" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f0efe79b-e62b-424e-9dfe-7e2e99231bdb/f0efe79b-e62b-424e-9dfe-7e2e99231bdb.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f0efe79b-e62b-424e-9dfe-7e2e99231bdb/f0efe79b-e62b-424e-9dfe-7e2e99231bdb.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f0efe79b-e62b-424e-9dfe-7e2e99231bdb/f0efe79b-e62b-424e-9dfe-7e2e99231bdb.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Jeffrey Epstein scandal is political because it exposes the intersection of power, money, elite access, prosecutorial failure, institutional protection, and government decision-making. But that does not mean it should be handed over to partisan...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Jeffrey Epstein scandal is political because it exposes the intersection of power, money, elite access, prosecutorial failure, institutional protection, and government decision-making. But that does not mean it should be handed over to partisan opportunists who use the horror of the case as a weapon against their enemies while ignoring anything that implicates their own side. Too many bad actors have turned Epstein into a tribal scoreboard, cherry-picking facts, inflating weak claims, burying inconvenient truths, and using survivor trauma as fuel for engagement, revenue, and personal branding. In the process, they have damaged the pursuit of justice by spreading confusion, weakening legitimate scrutiny, and giving powerful institutions an excuse to dismiss serious questions as partisan noise or conspiracy theater.<br /><br />At the center of this scandal are survivors who were failed by institutions that should have protected them, and they should never be reduced to props in a political content machine. Real accountability requires scrutinizing prosecutors, agencies, financial institutions, universities, media outlets, politicians, and elite social networks without fear, favoritism, or party loyalty. The people monetizing outrage while doing little to advance truth are helping divide the public and protect the same systems they claim to oppose. The only path forward is disciplined attention to evidence, court records, survivor statements, and institutional failures — not factional warfare, algorithmic rage, or cowardly loyalty to political teams.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1053</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Bill Gates and the Machinery Behind Modern Billionaire Image Laundering (6/2/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/bill-gates-and-the-machinery-behind-modern-billionaire-image-laundering-6-2-26--72286476</link><description><![CDATA[Bill Gates’ carefully cultivated public image as a calm, charitable, soft-spoken philanthropist is facing renewed scrutiny as questions around his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein continue to follow him. The focus is on how Gates transformed himself from a hard-charging Microsoft executive into a global humanitarian figure, with public relations teams shaping everything from his clothing and media appearances to the tone of his interviews. That polished “Mr. Nice Guy” image is now being challenged by reporting about his Epstein meetings, criticism of his personal conduct, and a growing public suspicion that the friendly billionaire persona was carefully manufactured rather than organic.<br /><br />The broader issue is that Gates’ reputation depends heavily on trust, and the Epstein connection damaged that trust in a way philanthropy alone cannot easily repair. Melinda French Gates has previously said his meetings with Epstein were a factor in their divorce, while Gates himself has called those meetings a mistake. The result is a public-relations problem that goes beyond one scandal: it raises questions about elite access, image management, accountability, and how powerful men are able to soften their reputations through philanthropy while uncomfortable parts of their history remain unresolved.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.firstpost.com/tech/is-bill-gates-mr-nice-guy-image-beginning-to-crack-14017466.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Is Bill Gates' Mr Nice Guy image beginning to crack? – Firstpost</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72286476</guid><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72286476/billgatesrelationshipbuffet.mp3" length="13584135" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/63b8fc5a-57b9-4658-b2df-df65c0e811c0/63b8fc5a-57b9-4658-b2df-df65c0e811c0.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/63b8fc5a-57b9-4658-b2df-df65c0e811c0/63b8fc5a-57b9-4658-b2df-df65c0e811c0.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/63b8fc5a-57b9-4658-b2df-df65c0e811c0/63b8fc5a-57b9-4658-b2df-df65c0e811c0.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Bill Gates’ carefully cultivated public image as a calm, charitable, soft-spoken philanthropist is facing renewed scrutiny as questions around his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein continue to follow him. The focus is on how Gates transformed himself...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Bill Gates’ carefully cultivated public image as a calm, charitable, soft-spoken philanthropist is facing renewed scrutiny as questions around his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein continue to follow him. The focus is on how Gates transformed himself from a hard-charging Microsoft executive into a global humanitarian figure, with public relations teams shaping everything from his clothing and media appearances to the tone of his interviews. That polished “Mr. Nice Guy” image is now being challenged by reporting about his Epstein meetings, criticism of his personal conduct, and a growing public suspicion that the friendly billionaire persona was carefully manufactured rather than organic.<br /><br />The broader issue is that Gates’ reputation depends heavily on trust, and the Epstein connection damaged that trust in a way philanthropy alone cannot easily repair. Melinda French Gates has previously said his meetings with Epstein were a factor in their divorce, while Gates himself has called those meetings a mistake. The result is a public-relations problem that goes beyond one scandal: it raises questions about elite access, image management, accountability, and how powerful men are able to soften their reputations through philanthropy while uncomfortable parts of their history remain unresolved.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.firstpost.com/tech/is-bill-gates-mr-nice-guy-image-beginning-to-crack-14017466.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Is Bill Gates' Mr Nice Guy image beginning to crack? – Firstpost</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>849</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Captain Of Security Operations At MCC And His OIG Deposition (Part 5) (6/2/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-captain-of-security-operations-at-mcc-and-his-oig-deposition-part-5-6-2-26--72286511</link><description><![CDATA[The document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s death. The captain described the command structure inside the jail, including his role supervising lieutenants and reporting up to associate wardens or the warden, while investigators walked him through staffing, rosters, post assignments, suicide-watch procedures, SHU operations, and the chain of responsibility on August 9–10, 2019. The transcript is important because it does not present Epstein’s death as a clean, orderly institutional event; instead, it shows a jail struggling with bad staffing, confusing handoffs, unfilled posts, questionable paperwork, and a command structure where critical responsibilities appear to have been either missed, misunderstood, or passed around.<br /><br /><br />The most serious value of the interview is in the irregularities it surfaces. The captain reportedly discussed inaccurate rosters or logs, acknowledged questions around skipped SHU rounds, addressed the fact that Epstein had previously been on suicide watch, and said he would not necessarily have known in real time if officers were failing to conduct required checks. Even more troubling, he expressed concern that certain documents may have been deliberately removed from files that should have been reviewed or audited, and investigators also raised an inmate-count issue involving an inmate named Reyes, whose release may not have been properly reflected in the institution’s count — something the captain treated as a protocol violation. Taken together, the transcript adds another layer to the larger Epstein death record: not a single clean explanation, but a bureaucratic mess of missing or questionable documentation, staffing failures, broken supervision, and institutional chaos at precisely the moment when the most high-profile federal inmate in America was supposed to be under careful control.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00111830.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00111830.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72286511</guid><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72286511/dardenoig6.mp3" length="11128207" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9786d2af-93cf-44ef-9b65-38c2809da399/9786d2af-93cf-44ef-9b65-38c2809da399.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9786d2af-93cf-44ef-9b65-38c2809da399/9786d2af-93cf-44ef-9b65-38c2809da399.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9786d2af-93cf-44ef-9b65-38c2809da399/9786d2af-93cf-44ef-9b65-38c2809da399.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s death. The captain described the command...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s death. The captain described the command structure inside the jail, including his role supervising lieutenants and reporting up to associate wardens or the warden, while investigators walked him through staffing, rosters, post assignments, suicide-watch procedures, SHU operations, and the chain of responsibility on August 9–10, 2019. The transcript is important because it does not present Epstein’s death as a clean, orderly institutional event; instead, it shows a jail struggling with bad staffing, confusing handoffs, unfilled posts, questionable paperwork, and a command structure where critical responsibilities appear to have been either missed, misunderstood, or passed around.<br /><br /><br />The most serious value of the interview is in the irregularities it surfaces. The captain reportedly discussed inaccurate rosters or logs, acknowledged questions around skipped SHU rounds, addressed the fact that Epstein had previously been on suicide watch, and said he would not necessarily have known in real time if officers were failing to conduct required checks. Even more troubling, he expressed concern that certain documents may have been deliberately removed from files that should have been reviewed or audited, and investigators also raised an inmate-count issue involving an inmate named Reyes, whose release may not have been properly reflected in the institution’s count — something the captain treated as a protocol violation. Taken together, the transcript adds another layer to the larger Epstein death record: not a single clean explanation, but a bureaucratic mess of missing or questionable documentation, staffing failures, broken supervision, and institutional chaos at precisely the moment when the most high-profile federal inmate in America was supposed to be under careful control.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00111830.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00111830.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>696</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   Jeffrey Epstein And His Utilization Of Shadow Markets (6/1/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-his-utilization-of-shadow-markets-6-1-26--72280470</link><description><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein’s money trail was never just about bank balances; it was about architecture. He operated through a maze of offshore and low-tax jurisdictions that gave him secrecy, flexibility, tax advantages, and distance from ordinary scrutiny. Bermuda shows up clearly in the Paradise Papers reporting through Liquid Funding Ltd., a Bermuda-registered company Epstein chaired from roughly 2000 to 2007, tied to complex mortgage-backed financial products and serviced through Appleby, the powerful offshore law firm. The broader point is that Epstein understood the offshore world the way powerful men often do: not as a hiding place in the cartoon sense, but as a professionalized system of shell companies, nominee structures, favorable tax regimes, and elite lawyers who could make wealth harder to trace, harder to tax, and harder to connect cleanly to the person controlling it.<br /><br />That same pattern extended through the Virgin Islands, where Epstein built not only a private physical kingdom on Little St. James and Great St. James, but also a corporate and tax structure around entities like Southern Trust Company. The U.S. Virgin Islands later alleged that Epstein and his co-defendants used property and companies in the territory to carry out and conceal his trafficking operation, and the estate ultimately settled with the territory for more than $105 million, including the return of more than $80 million in economic development tax benefits officials said had been fraudulently obtained. The British Virgin Islands and similar offshore destinations fit into the same larger ecosystem: jurisdictions prized by the global wealthy because they can obscure ownership, separate assets from reputational risk, and create layers between money, movement, and accountability. For Epstein, offshore finance was not incidental. It was part of the machine — a way to keep wealth liquid, guarded, and protected while the public saw only the mansions, the islands, the jets, and the surface-level performance of legitimacy.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72280470</guid><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 10:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72280470/megaepsteinoffshore.mp3" length="51657709" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6799918b-d370-4fd6-bf83-a5fe795d0e18/6799918b-d370-4fd6-bf83-a5fe795d0e18.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6799918b-d370-4fd6-bf83-a5fe795d0e18/6799918b-d370-4fd6-bf83-a5fe795d0e18.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6799918b-d370-4fd6-bf83-a5fe795d0e18/6799918b-d370-4fd6-bf83-a5fe795d0e18.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jeffrey Epstein’s money trail was never just about bank balances; it was about architecture. He operated through a maze of offshore and low-tax jurisdictions that gave him secrecy, flexibility, tax advantages, and distance from ordinary scrutiny....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein’s money trail was never just about bank balances; it was about architecture. He operated through a maze of offshore and low-tax jurisdictions that gave him secrecy, flexibility, tax advantages, and distance from ordinary scrutiny. Bermuda shows up clearly in the Paradise Papers reporting through Liquid Funding Ltd., a Bermuda-registered company Epstein chaired from roughly 2000 to 2007, tied to complex mortgage-backed financial products and serviced through Appleby, the powerful offshore law firm. The broader point is that Epstein understood the offshore world the way powerful men often do: not as a hiding place in the cartoon sense, but as a professionalized system of shell companies, nominee structures, favorable tax regimes, and elite lawyers who could make wealth harder to trace, harder to tax, and harder to connect cleanly to the person controlling it.<br /><br />That same pattern extended through the Virgin Islands, where Epstein built not only a private physical kingdom on Little St. James and Great St. James, but also a corporate and tax structure around entities like Southern Trust Company. The U.S. Virgin Islands later alleged that Epstein and his co-defendants used property and companies in the territory to carry out and conceal his trafficking operation, and the estate ultimately settled with the territory for more than $105 million, including the return of more than $80 million in economic development tax benefits officials said had been fraudulently obtained. The British Virgin Islands and similar offshore destinations fit into the same larger ecosystem: jurisdictions prized by the global wealthy because they can obscure ownership, separate assets from reputational risk, and create layers between money, movement, and accountability. For Epstein, offshore finance was not incidental. It was part of the machine — a way to keep wealth liquid, guarded, and protected while the public saw only the mansions, the islands, the jets, and the surface-level performance of legitimacy.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3229</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The DOJ And Their Refusal To Put an End To Epstein's Crimes (6/2/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-doj-and-their-refusal-to-put-an-end-to-epstein-s-crimes-6-2-26--72280469</link><description><![CDATA[For close to four decades, Jeffrey Epstein was treated less like a target of the full weight of federal law enforcement and more like a problem the system kept managing, minimizing, delaying, or quietly passing along. From the early warning signs around his access to young girls, to the Palm Beach investigation, to the federal review that could have produced a sweeping sex-trafficking case, the pattern was not one of urgency. It was hesitation, deference, and institutional cowardice. The clearest example remains the 2007–2008 non-prosecution agreement, where the Department of Justice allowed Epstein to escape a potentially devastating federal indictment and instead accept a state-level plea that turned a sprawling abuse operation into a grotesquely soft jail arrangement. Even worse, the agreement protected potential co-conspirators and was kept from the survivors, meaning the people most harmed by Epstein’s crimes were cut out while the machinery of government quietly made peace with the man who abused them.<br /><br />That pattern did not end with the sweetheart deal. For years afterward, the federal system seemed more interested in explaining away its failures than confronting them. Epstein’s network remained underexplored, his alleged accomplices were largely untouched, his financial enablers were not dragged into the public square with the force the case demanded, and even after his 2019 arrest, the government’s handling of his custody ended in another institutional disaster: his death inside a federal jail under circumstances that exposed staggering incompetence, missing accountability, and a bureaucracy that once again asked the public to accept failure as coincidence. The DOJ had chance after chance to break the pattern — to treat Epstein not as an embarrassment to contain, but as the center of a decades-long trafficking operation that demanded a full public reckoning. Instead, again and again, it turned the other cheek, protected the institution, and left survivors watching the most powerful justice system in the world behave like it was afraid of its own case.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72280469</guid><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 10:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72280469/megadojrelationshipwithepstein.mp3" length="43269686" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d0dd67a8-f286-4b14-b4a5-af4dab23043b/d0dd67a8-f286-4b14-b4a5-af4dab23043b.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d0dd67a8-f286-4b14-b4a5-af4dab23043b/d0dd67a8-f286-4b14-b4a5-af4dab23043b.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d0dd67a8-f286-4b14-b4a5-af4dab23043b/d0dd67a8-f286-4b14-b4a5-af4dab23043b.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>For close to four decades, Jeffrey Epstein was treated less like a target of the full weight of federal law enforcement and more like a problem the system kept managing, minimizing, delaying, or quietly passing along. From the early warning signs...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[For close to four decades, Jeffrey Epstein was treated less like a target of the full weight of federal law enforcement and more like a problem the system kept managing, minimizing, delaying, or quietly passing along. From the early warning signs around his access to young girls, to the Palm Beach investigation, to the federal review that could have produced a sweeping sex-trafficking case, the pattern was not one of urgency. It was hesitation, deference, and institutional cowardice. The clearest example remains the 2007–2008 non-prosecution agreement, where the Department of Justice allowed Epstein to escape a potentially devastating federal indictment and instead accept a state-level plea that turned a sprawling abuse operation into a grotesquely soft jail arrangement. Even worse, the agreement protected potential co-conspirators and was kept from the survivors, meaning the people most harmed by Epstein’s crimes were cut out while the machinery of government quietly made peace with the man who abused them.<br /><br />That pattern did not end with the sweetheart deal. For years afterward, the federal system seemed more interested in explaining away its failures than confronting them. Epstein’s network remained underexplored, his alleged accomplices were largely untouched, his financial enablers were not dragged into the public square with the force the case demanded, and even after his 2019 arrest, the government’s handling of his custody ended in another institutional disaster: his death inside a federal jail under circumstances that exposed staggering incompetence, missing accountability, and a bureaucracy that once again asked the public to accept failure as coincidence. The DOJ had chance after chance to break the pattern — to treat Epstein not as an embarrassment to contain, but as the center of a decades-long trafficking operation that demanded a full public reckoning. Instead, again and again, it turned the other cheek, protected the institution, and left survivors watching the most powerful justice system in the world behave like it was afraid of its own case.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2705</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   Alex Acosta And The Lack Of Courage In Palm Beach (6/2/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-alex-acosta-and-the-lack-of-courage-in-palm-beach-6-2-26--72280468</link><description><![CDATA[Alex Acosta had a choice. As the U.S. Attorney in South Florida, he was not some powerless clerk handed a file and told to stamp it. He was the federal official whose office had reviewed evidence that Jeffrey Epstein’s conduct could support a serious federal sex-trafficking prosecution. Instead of forcing the case into open federal court, Acosta’s office approved a secretive non-prosecution agreement that allowed Epstein to plead to comparatively minor state charges, serve a wildly lenient sentence with work-release privileges, and shield named or unnamed potential co-conspirators from federal prosecution. That was the moment when the federal government could have treated Epstein like the predator prosecutors believed he was. Instead, the case was redirected into a backroom arrangement that protected power, preserved reputations, and left survivors locked out of the process.<br /><br />The most damning part is that Acosta later suggested the pressure came from above, reportedly saying Epstein “belonged to intelligence” and that he was told to leave it alone. Whether that explanation was self-preservation, truth, exaggeration, or an attempt to shift blame, it still lands in the same ugly place: Acosta did not stand up and blow the whistle. He did not resign in protest. He did not drag the matter into the sunlight. He did not force Washington to own the interference publicly. He took the deal, signed off on the machinery, and years later acted as though the decision had somehow happened around him instead of through him. That is why the Acosta chapter remains so poisonous: because it looks like a federal prosecutor faced with a powerful defendant, pressure from D.C., and a victim pool full of young girls — and chose institutional obedience.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72280468</guid><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72280468/megaacostacowardice.mp3" length="59665001" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4fd3b63b-ab05-48fa-aac0-fb18a473ac31/4fd3b63b-ab05-48fa-aac0-fb18a473ac31.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4fd3b63b-ab05-48fa-aac0-fb18a473ac31/4fd3b63b-ab05-48fa-aac0-fb18a473ac31.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4fd3b63b-ab05-48fa-aac0-fb18a473ac31/4fd3b63b-ab05-48fa-aac0-fb18a473ac31.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Alex Acosta had a choice. As the U.S. Attorney in South Florida, he was not some powerless clerk handed a file and told to stamp it. He was the federal official whose office had reviewed evidence that Jeffrey Epstein’s conduct could support a serious...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Alex Acosta had a choice. As the U.S. Attorney in South Florida, he was not some powerless clerk handed a file and told to stamp it. He was the federal official whose office had reviewed evidence that Jeffrey Epstein’s conduct could support a serious federal sex-trafficking prosecution. Instead of forcing the case into open federal court, Acosta’s office approved a secretive non-prosecution agreement that allowed Epstein to plead to comparatively minor state charges, serve a wildly lenient sentence with work-release privileges, and shield named or unnamed potential co-conspirators from federal prosecution. That was the moment when the federal government could have treated Epstein like the predator prosecutors believed he was. Instead, the case was redirected into a backroom arrangement that protected power, preserved reputations, and left survivors locked out of the process.<br /><br />The most damning part is that Acosta later suggested the pressure came from above, reportedly saying Epstein “belonged to intelligence” and that he was told to leave it alone. Whether that explanation was self-preservation, truth, exaggeration, or an attempt to shift blame, it still lands in the same ugly place: Acosta did not stand up and blow the whistle. He did not resign in protest. He did not drag the matter into the sunlight. He did not force Washington to own the interference publicly. He took the deal, signed off on the machinery, and years later acted as though the decision had somehow happened around him instead of through him. That is why the Acosta chapter remains so poisonous: because it looks like a federal prosecutor faced with a powerful defendant, pressure from D.C., and a victim pool full of young girls — and chose institutional obedience.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3730</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Virginia Robert's Repsonds To Ghislaine Maxwell's "Undisputed Facts" (Part 3) (6/1/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/virginia-robert-s-repsonds-to-ghislaine-maxwell-s-undisputed-facts-part-3-6-1-26--72227870</link><description><![CDATA[In her Second Amended Response to Maxwell’s discovery demands, Virginia Giuffre pushed back aggressively, refusing to yield to Maxwell’s attempts to broaden discovery into intrusive and irrelevant personal and psychological domains. She objected to Maxwell’s sprawling requests as overly burdensome, unduly invasive, and aimed at discrediting her through unnecessary exposure rather than legitimate legal pursuit. Giuffre instead reinforced her focus on evidence directly tied to the defamation claims and trafficking allegations, contesting any effort by Maxwell to turn the process into a fishing expedition or reputation‑smearing exercise under the guise of legal procedure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24253540-epstein-documents-943-pages" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">epstein-documents-943-pages - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72227870</guid><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72227870/virgrespfact3.mp3" length="12201108" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c2201d8b-32a9-4731-bcaa-a5b13f408de8/c2201d8b-32a9-4731-bcaa-a5b13f408de8.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c2201d8b-32a9-4731-bcaa-a5b13f408de8/c2201d8b-32a9-4731-bcaa-a5b13f408de8.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c2201d8b-32a9-4731-bcaa-a5b13f408de8/c2201d8b-32a9-4731-bcaa-a5b13f408de8.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In her Second Amended Response to Maxwell’s discovery demands, Virginia Giuffre pushed back aggressively, refusing to yield to Maxwell’s attempts to broaden discovery into intrusive and irrelevant personal and psychological domains. She objected to...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In her Second Amended Response to Maxwell’s discovery demands, Virginia Giuffre pushed back aggressively, refusing to yield to Maxwell’s attempts to broaden discovery into intrusive and irrelevant personal and psychological domains. She objected to Maxwell’s sprawling requests as overly burdensome, unduly invasive, and aimed at discrediting her through unnecessary exposure rather than legitimate legal pursuit. Giuffre instead reinforced her focus on evidence directly tied to the defamation claims and trafficking allegations, contesting any effort by Maxwell to turn the process into a fishing expedition or reputation‑smearing exercise under the guise of legal procedure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24253540-epstein-documents-943-pages" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">epstein-documents-943-pages - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>763</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Virginia Robert's Repsonds To Ghislaine Maxwell's "Undisputed Facts" (Part 2) (6/1/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/virginia-robert-s-repsonds-to-ghislaine-maxwell-s-undisputed-facts-part-2-6-1-26--72227866</link><description><![CDATA[In her Second Amended Response to Maxwell’s discovery demands, Virginia Giuffre pushed back aggressively, refusing to yield to Maxwell’s attempts to broaden discovery into intrusive and irrelevant personal and psychological domains. She objected to Maxwell’s sprawling requests as overly burdensome, unduly invasive, and aimed at discrediting her through unnecessary exposure rather than legitimate legal pursuit. Giuffre instead reinforced her focus on evidence directly tied to the defamation claims and trafficking allegations, contesting any effort by Maxwell to turn the process into a fishing expedition or reputation‑smearing exercise under the guise of legal procedure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24253540-epstein-documents-943-pages" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">epstein-documents-943-pages - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72227866</guid><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72227866/virgrespfact2.mp3" length="13957373" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5b5d3f8a-3d06-42bf-b738-07e167acddd1/5b5d3f8a-3d06-42bf-b738-07e167acddd1.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5b5d3f8a-3d06-42bf-b738-07e167acddd1/5b5d3f8a-3d06-42bf-b738-07e167acddd1.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5b5d3f8a-3d06-42bf-b738-07e167acddd1/5b5d3f8a-3d06-42bf-b738-07e167acddd1.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In her Second Amended Response to Maxwell’s discovery demands, Virginia Giuffre pushed back aggressively, refusing to yield to Maxwell’s attempts to broaden discovery into intrusive and irrelevant personal and psychological domains. She objected to...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In her Second Amended Response to Maxwell’s discovery demands, Virginia Giuffre pushed back aggressively, refusing to yield to Maxwell’s attempts to broaden discovery into intrusive and irrelevant personal and psychological domains. She objected to Maxwell’s sprawling requests as overly burdensome, unduly invasive, and aimed at discrediting her through unnecessary exposure rather than legitimate legal pursuit. Giuffre instead reinforced her focus on evidence directly tied to the defamation claims and trafficking allegations, contesting any effort by Maxwell to turn the process into a fishing expedition or reputation‑smearing exercise under the guise of legal procedure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24253540-epstein-documents-943-pages" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">epstein-documents-943-pages - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>873</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Virginia Robert's Repsonds To Ghislaine Maxwell's "Undisputed Facts" (Part 1) (6/1/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/virginia-robert-s-repsonds-to-ghislaine-maxwell-s-undisputed-facts-part-1-6-1-26--72227871</link><description><![CDATA[In her Second Amended Response to Maxwell’s discovery demands, Virginia Giuffre pushed back aggressively, refusing to yield to Maxwell’s attempts to broaden discovery into intrusive and irrelevant personal and psychological domains. She objected to Maxwell’s sprawling requests as overly burdensome, unduly invasive, and aimed at discrediting her through unnecessary exposure rather than legitimate legal pursuit. Giuffre instead reinforced her focus on evidence directly tied to the defamation claims and trafficking allegations, contesting any effort by Maxwell to turn the process into a fishing expedition or reputation‑smearing exercise under the guise of legal procedure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24253540-epstein-documents-943-pages" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">epstein-documents-943-pages - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72227871</guid><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72227871/virgrespfact1.mp3" length="11401134" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d8cd1b72-0f62-4bb5-99cf-0e0a9a952607/d8cd1b72-0f62-4bb5-99cf-0e0a9a952607.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d8cd1b72-0f62-4bb5-99cf-0e0a9a952607/d8cd1b72-0f62-4bb5-99cf-0e0a9a952607.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d8cd1b72-0f62-4bb5-99cf-0e0a9a952607/d8cd1b72-0f62-4bb5-99cf-0e0a9a952607.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In her Second Amended Response to Maxwell’s discovery demands, Virginia Giuffre pushed back aggressively, refusing to yield to Maxwell’s attempts to broaden discovery into intrusive and irrelevant personal and psychological domains. She objected to...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In her Second Amended Response to Maxwell’s discovery demands, Virginia Giuffre pushed back aggressively, refusing to yield to Maxwell’s attempts to broaden discovery into intrusive and irrelevant personal and psychological domains. She objected to Maxwell’s sprawling requests as overly burdensome, unduly invasive, and aimed at discrediting her through unnecessary exposure rather than legitimate legal pursuit. Giuffre instead reinforced her focus on evidence directly tied to the defamation claims and trafficking allegations, contesting any effort by Maxwell to turn the process into a fishing expedition or reputation‑smearing exercise under the guise of legal procedure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24253540-epstein-documents-943-pages" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">epstein-documents-943-pages - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>713</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Ghislaine Maxwell's Undisputed Statement Of Facts Pursuant To Virginia's Allegations (Part 5)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/ghislaine-maxwell-s-undisputed-statement-of-facts-pursuant-to-virginia-s-allegations-part-5--72227872</link><description><![CDATA[Ghislaine Maxwell’s Rule 56.1 request in the defamation lawsuit brought by Virginia Roberts Giuffre was a procedural move designed to narrow the case before trial by asking the court to treat Maxwell’s version of certain facts as undisputed. Under Local Rule 56.1, parties seeking summary judgment have to lay out the material facts they claim are not genuinely in dispute, with citations to admissible evidence. Maxwell argued that Giuffre’s response failed that test because, in Maxwell’s view, Giuffre did not properly support many of her denials with admissible evidence. Maxwell also objected to Giuffre adding her own supposedly “undisputed facts,” arguing that Giuffre had not filed her own cross-motion for summary judgment and therefore could not use the Rule 56.1 process to smuggle in a competing fact narrative.<br /><br />The request mattered because it was not just a dry filing dispute; it went directly to how Maxwell wanted the court to view the foundation of Giuffre’s claims. Maxwell sought to have several facts deemed admitted, including points about Giuffre’s earlier media interviews, the 2011 and 2015 statements issued on Maxwell’s behalf, the way Giuffre’s allegations appeared in prior court filings, and whether media republication of Maxwell’s denials could legally be pinned on Maxwell. In plain English, Maxwell was trying to box Giuffre in procedurally: if the court accepted Maxwell’s Rule 56.1 position, it would weaken Giuffre’s ability to argue that there were disputed facts requiring a jury trial. But the broader context is that this was part of Maxwell’s aggressive defense strategy in the 2015 defamation case, where Giuffre sued after Maxwell publicly branded her allegations false; the case eventually settled, while the sealed filings later became a major source of Epstein-related disclosures.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72227872</guid><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 22:15:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72227872/maxstatementfacts5.mp3" length="17264684" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e384accf-bba6-4494-a01f-6db4580d1e05/e384accf-bba6-4494-a01f-6db4580d1e05.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e384accf-bba6-4494-a01f-6db4580d1e05/e384accf-bba6-4494-a01f-6db4580d1e05.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e384accf-bba6-4494-a01f-6db4580d1e05/e384accf-bba6-4494-a01f-6db4580d1e05.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Ghislaine Maxwell’s Rule 56.1 request in the defamation lawsuit brought by Virginia Roberts Giuffre was a procedural move designed to narrow the case before trial by asking the court to treat Maxwell’s version of certain facts as undisputed. Under...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Ghislaine Maxwell’s Rule 56.1 request in the defamation lawsuit brought by Virginia Roberts Giuffre was a procedural move designed to narrow the case before trial by asking the court to treat Maxwell’s version of certain facts as undisputed. Under Local Rule 56.1, parties seeking summary judgment have to lay out the material facts they claim are not genuinely in dispute, with citations to admissible evidence. Maxwell argued that Giuffre’s response failed that test because, in Maxwell’s view, Giuffre did not properly support many of her denials with admissible evidence. Maxwell also objected to Giuffre adding her own supposedly “undisputed facts,” arguing that Giuffre had not filed her own cross-motion for summary judgment and therefore could not use the Rule 56.1 process to smuggle in a competing fact narrative.<br /><br />The request mattered because it was not just a dry filing dispute; it went directly to how Maxwell wanted the court to view the foundation of Giuffre’s claims. Maxwell sought to have several facts deemed admitted, including points about Giuffre’s earlier media interviews, the 2011 and 2015 statements issued on Maxwell’s behalf, the way Giuffre’s allegations appeared in prior court filings, and whether media republication of Maxwell’s denials could legally be pinned on Maxwell. In plain English, Maxwell was trying to box Giuffre in procedurally: if the court accepted Maxwell’s Rule 56.1 position, it would weaken Giuffre’s ability to argue that there were disputed facts requiring a jury trial. But the broader context is that this was part of Maxwell’s aggressive defense strategy in the 2015 defamation case, where Giuffre sued after Maxwell publicly branded her allegations false; the case eventually settled, while the sealed filings later became a major source of Epstein-related disclosures.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1080</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Lesley Groff and the Administrative Backbone of Epstein’s World (Part 3) (6/1/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/lesley-groff-and-the-administrative-backbone-of-epstein-s-world-part-3-6-1-26--72268012</link><description><![CDATA[Lesley Groff was Jeffrey Epstein’s longest-serving and most senior assistant, working for him from 2001 until his 2019 arrest, and the newly examined records place her closer to his daily life than almost anyone else in the Epstein files. Her name reportedly appears more than any other name in the released material, because she handled the machinery of Epstein’s world: calendars, travel, calls, appointments, visitors, gifts, household details, meals, flights, logistics, and the constant scheduling of massages. Groff has always maintained through her lawyers that she did not know Epstein was committing crimes, and she has never been criminally charged. But the record creates the obvious and uncomfortable question: how could someone so embedded in Epstein’s routines, movements, communications, and appointments remain unaware of what was happening around him for nearly two decades? The documents show her as an intensely loyal functionary inside Epstein’s operation, someone who could move from arranging absurd household preferences to coordinating meetings with powerful men, while also helping facilitate the flow of young women, guests, and associates through his homes and social orbit.<br /><br />The larger significance is that Groff’s role sits in the gray zone between legal culpability, claimed ignorance, and moral responsibility. She was not Ghislaine Maxwell, and the public record does not show that prosecutors ever charged her as an accomplice, but she was also not a distant employee who occasionally answered a phone. She was the person Epstein relied on to make the system work, and that system included the very rhythms that survivors later described as central to his abuse: massages, travel, private meetings, assistants, young women, and a network of people whose access had to be managed. Congressional investigators have since sought to interview her because they believe she may have information that could help explain what the government missed or failed to act on. Groff’s defense is that she did not know; the enduring problem is that the Epstein files make clear she was close enough to the center of the operation that the question of what she saw, what she understood, and what she chose not to ask remains impossible to avoid.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/news/2026/may/28/inside-the-world-of-jeffrey-epstein-assistant-lesley-groff" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">‘Seriously the best boss ever’: inside the world of Jeffrey Epstein’s assistant | Jeffrey Epstein | The Guardian</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72268012</guid><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72268012/groff3.mp3" length="22749144" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e82139f2-84e0-4822-98b2-b53fd2a32258/e82139f2-84e0-4822-98b2-b53fd2a32258.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e82139f2-84e0-4822-98b2-b53fd2a32258/e82139f2-84e0-4822-98b2-b53fd2a32258.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e82139f2-84e0-4822-98b2-b53fd2a32258/e82139f2-84e0-4822-98b2-b53fd2a32258.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Lesley Groff was Jeffrey Epstein’s longest-serving and most senior assistant, working for him from 2001 until his 2019 arrest, and the newly examined records place her closer to his daily life than almost anyone else in the Epstein files. Her name...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Lesley Groff was Jeffrey Epstein’s longest-serving and most senior assistant, working for him from 2001 until his 2019 arrest, and the newly examined records place her closer to his daily life than almost anyone else in the Epstein files. Her name reportedly appears more than any other name in the released material, because she handled the machinery of Epstein’s world: calendars, travel, calls, appointments, visitors, gifts, household details, meals, flights, logistics, and the constant scheduling of massages. Groff has always maintained through her lawyers that she did not know Epstein was committing crimes, and she has never been criminally charged. But the record creates the obvious and uncomfortable question: how could someone so embedded in Epstein’s routines, movements, communications, and appointments remain unaware of what was happening around him for nearly two decades? The documents show her as an intensely loyal functionary inside Epstein’s operation, someone who could move from arranging absurd household preferences to coordinating meetings with powerful men, while also helping facilitate the flow of young women, guests, and associates through his homes and social orbit.<br /><br />The larger significance is that Groff’s role sits in the gray zone between legal culpability, claimed ignorance, and moral responsibility. She was not Ghislaine Maxwell, and the public record does not show that prosecutors ever charged her as an accomplice, but she was also not a distant employee who occasionally answered a phone. She was the person Epstein relied on to make the system work, and that system included the very rhythms that survivors later described as central to his abuse: massages, travel, private meetings, assistants, young women, and a network of people whose access had to be managed. Congressional investigators have since sought to interview her because they believe she may have information that could help explain what the government missed or failed to act on. Groff’s defense is that she did not know; the enduring problem is that the Epstein files make clear she was close enough to the center of the operation that the question of what she saw, what she understood, and what she chose not to ask remains impossible to avoid.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/news/2026/may/28/inside-the-world-of-jeffrey-epstein-assistant-lesley-groff" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">‘Seriously the best boss ever’: inside the world of Jeffrey Epstein’s assistant | Jeffrey Epstein | The Guardian</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1422</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Lesley Groff and the Administrative Backbone of Epstein’s World (Part 2) (6/1/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/lesley-groff-and-the-administrative-backbone-of-epstein-s-world-part-2-6-1-26--72268010</link><description><![CDATA[Lesley Groff was Jeffrey Epstein’s longest-serving and most senior assistant, working for him from 2001 until his 2019 arrest, and the newly examined records place her closer to his daily life than almost anyone else in the Epstein files. Her name reportedly appears more than any other name in the released material, because she handled the machinery of Epstein’s world: calendars, travel, calls, appointments, visitors, gifts, household details, meals, flights, logistics, and the constant scheduling of massages. Groff has always maintained through her lawyers that she did not know Epstein was committing crimes, and she has never been criminally charged. But the record creates the obvious and uncomfortable question: how could someone so embedded in Epstein’s routines, movements, communications, and appointments remain unaware of what was happening around him for nearly two decades? The documents show her as an intensely loyal functionary inside Epstein’s operation, someone who could move from arranging absurd household preferences to coordinating meetings with powerful men, while also helping facilitate the flow of young women, guests, and associates through his homes and social orbit.<br /><br />The larger significance is that Groff’s role sits in the gray zone between legal culpability, claimed ignorance, and moral responsibility. She was not Ghislaine Maxwell, and the public record does not show that prosecutors ever charged her as an accomplice, but she was also not a distant employee who occasionally answered a phone. She was the person Epstein relied on to make the system work, and that system included the very rhythms that survivors later described as central to his abuse: massages, travel, private meetings, assistants, young women, and a network of people whose access had to be managed. Congressional investigators have since sought to interview her because they believe she may have information that could help explain what the government missed or failed to act on. Groff’s defense is that she did not know; the enduring problem is that the Epstein files make clear she was close enough to the center of the operation that the question of what she saw, what she understood, and what she chose not to ask remains impossible to avoid.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/news/2026/may/28/inside-the-world-of-jeffrey-epstein-assistant-lesley-groff" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">‘Seriously the best boss ever’: inside the world of Jeffrey Epstein’s assistant | Jeffrey Epstein | The Guardian</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72268010</guid><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 18:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72268010/groff2.mp3" length="15727012" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/eb191f37-8719-45f7-b183-b7a0ab842e8e/eb191f37-8719-45f7-b183-b7a0ab842e8e.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/eb191f37-8719-45f7-b183-b7a0ab842e8e/eb191f37-8719-45f7-b183-b7a0ab842e8e.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/eb191f37-8719-45f7-b183-b7a0ab842e8e/eb191f37-8719-45f7-b183-b7a0ab842e8e.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Lesley Groff was Jeffrey Epstein’s longest-serving and most senior assistant, working for him from 2001 until his 2019 arrest, and the newly examined records place her closer to his daily life than almost anyone else in the Epstein files. Her name...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Lesley Groff was Jeffrey Epstein’s longest-serving and most senior assistant, working for him from 2001 until his 2019 arrest, and the newly examined records place her closer to his daily life than almost anyone else in the Epstein files. Her name reportedly appears more than any other name in the released material, because she handled the machinery of Epstein’s world: calendars, travel, calls, appointments, visitors, gifts, household details, meals, flights, logistics, and the constant scheduling of massages. Groff has always maintained through her lawyers that she did not know Epstein was committing crimes, and she has never been criminally charged. But the record creates the obvious and uncomfortable question: how could someone so embedded in Epstein’s routines, movements, communications, and appointments remain unaware of what was happening around him for nearly two decades? The documents show her as an intensely loyal functionary inside Epstein’s operation, someone who could move from arranging absurd household preferences to coordinating meetings with powerful men, while also helping facilitate the flow of young women, guests, and associates through his homes and social orbit.<br /><br />The larger significance is that Groff’s role sits in the gray zone between legal culpability, claimed ignorance, and moral responsibility. She was not Ghislaine Maxwell, and the public record does not show that prosecutors ever charged her as an accomplice, but she was also not a distant employee who occasionally answered a phone. She was the person Epstein relied on to make the system work, and that system included the very rhythms that survivors later described as central to his abuse: massages, travel, private meetings, assistants, young women, and a network of people whose access had to be managed. Congressional investigators have since sought to interview her because they believe she may have information that could help explain what the government missed or failed to act on. Groff’s defense is that she did not know; the enduring problem is that the Epstein files make clear she was close enough to the center of the operation that the question of what she saw, what she understood, and what she chose not to ask remains impossible to avoid.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/news/2026/may/28/inside-the-world-of-jeffrey-epstein-assistant-lesley-groff" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">‘Seriously the best boss ever’: inside the world of Jeffrey Epstein’s assistant | Jeffrey Epstein | The Guardian</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>983</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Lesley Groff and the Administrative Backbone of Epstein’s World (Part 1) (6/1/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/lesley-groff-and-the-administrative-backbone-of-epstein-s-world-part-1-6-1-26--72268011</link><description><![CDATA[Lesley Groff was Jeffrey Epstein’s longest-serving and most senior assistant, working for him from 2001 until his 2019 arrest, and the newly examined records place her closer to his daily life than almost anyone else in the Epstein files. Her name reportedly appears more than any other name in the released material, because she handled the machinery of Epstein’s world: calendars, travel, calls, appointments, visitors, gifts, household details, meals, flights, logistics, and the constant scheduling of massages. Groff has always maintained through her lawyers that she did not know Epstein was committing crimes, and she has never been criminally charged. But the record creates the obvious and uncomfortable question: how could someone so embedded in Epstein’s routines, movements, communications, and appointments remain unaware of what was happening around him for nearly two decades? The documents show her as an intensely loyal functionary inside Epstein’s operation, someone who could move from arranging absurd household preferences to coordinating meetings with powerful men, while also helping facilitate the flow of young women, guests, and associates through his homes and social orbit.<br /><br />The larger significance is that Groff’s role sits in the gray zone between legal culpability, claimed ignorance, and moral responsibility. She was not Ghislaine Maxwell, and the public record does not show that prosecutors ever charged her as an accomplice, but she was also not a distant employee who occasionally answered a phone. She was the person Epstein relied on to make the system work, and that system included the very rhythms that survivors later described as central to his abuse: massages, travel, private meetings, assistants, young women, and a network of people whose access had to be managed. Congressional investigators have since sought to interview her because they believe she may have information that could help explain what the government missed or failed to act on. Groff’s defense is that she did not know; the enduring problem is that the Epstein files make clear she was close enough to the center of the operation that the question of what she saw, what she understood, and what she chose not to ask remains impossible to avoid.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/news/2026/may/28/inside-the-world-of-jeffrey-epstein-assistant-lesley-groff" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">‘Seriously the best boss ever’: inside the world of Jeffrey Epstein’s assistant | Jeffrey Epstein | The Guardian</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72268011</guid><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 16:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72268011/groff1.mp3" length="15031946" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/fe6c4ce9-0cf8-4487-ae83-015de2ea51df/fe6c4ce9-0cf8-4487-ae83-015de2ea51df.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/fe6c4ce9-0cf8-4487-ae83-015de2ea51df/fe6c4ce9-0cf8-4487-ae83-015de2ea51df.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/fe6c4ce9-0cf8-4487-ae83-015de2ea51df/fe6c4ce9-0cf8-4487-ae83-015de2ea51df.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Lesley Groff was Jeffrey Epstein’s longest-serving and most senior assistant, working for him from 2001 until his 2019 arrest, and the newly examined records place her closer to his daily life than almost anyone else in the Epstein files. Her name...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Lesley Groff was Jeffrey Epstein’s longest-serving and most senior assistant, working for him from 2001 until his 2019 arrest, and the newly examined records place her closer to his daily life than almost anyone else in the Epstein files. Her name reportedly appears more than any other name in the released material, because she handled the machinery of Epstein’s world: calendars, travel, calls, appointments, visitors, gifts, household details, meals, flights, logistics, and the constant scheduling of massages. Groff has always maintained through her lawyers that she did not know Epstein was committing crimes, and she has never been criminally charged. But the record creates the obvious and uncomfortable question: how could someone so embedded in Epstein’s routines, movements, communications, and appointments remain unaware of what was happening around him for nearly two decades? The documents show her as an intensely loyal functionary inside Epstein’s operation, someone who could move from arranging absurd household preferences to coordinating meetings with powerful men, while also helping facilitate the flow of young women, guests, and associates through his homes and social orbit.<br /><br />The larger significance is that Groff’s role sits in the gray zone between legal culpability, claimed ignorance, and moral responsibility. She was not Ghislaine Maxwell, and the public record does not show that prosecutors ever charged her as an accomplice, but she was also not a distant employee who occasionally answered a phone. She was the person Epstein relied on to make the system work, and that system included the very rhythms that survivors later described as central to his abuse: massages, travel, private meetings, assistants, young women, and a network of people whose access had to be managed. Congressional investigators have since sought to interview her because they believe she may have information that could help explain what the government missed or failed to act on. Groff’s defense is that she did not know; the enduring problem is that the Epstein files make clear she was close enough to the center of the operation that the question of what she saw, what she understood, and what she chose not to ask remains impossible to avoid.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/news/2026/may/28/inside-the-world-of-jeffrey-epstein-assistant-lesley-groff" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">‘Seriously the best boss ever’: inside the world of Jeffrey Epstein’s assistant | Jeffrey Epstein | The Guardian</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>940</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Closed Doors, Redacted Files, and the Bondi Testimony (6/1/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/closed-doors-redacted-files-and-the-bondi-testimony-6-1-26--72268027</link><description><![CDATA[Pam Bondi’s closed-door congressional testimony over the Epstein files centered on the same problem that has haunted the entire release process: the Justice Department promised transparency, then delivered a document dump riddled with redactions, omissions, privacy violations, and unanswered questions. According to the reporting, Bondi defended the DOJ’s handling of the files while acknowledging that there were “redaction errors,” including material that critics say should never have been exposed because it risked identifying victims. She also tried to distance herself from the day-to-day review by saying she delegated much of the process to then-Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, while still insisting the department acted lawfully and responsibly. Democrats came out of the session accusing her of stonewalling, especially when questions turned to Donald Trump, his name appearing in Epstein-related material, and whether the White House influenced what the public did or did not get to see.<br /><br />The testimony also highlighted how much of the Epstein files fight has become a battle over controlled disclosure rather than real accountability. Bondi reportedly refused to answer multiple questions involving Trump, while lawmakers argued that millions of pages still had not been released and that the DOJ’s process protected powerful names while failing survivors. Republicans, including House Oversight Chair James Comer, framed the interview as part of a broader effort to figure out why documents remain withheld, while Democrats said Bondi’s answers only deepened suspicions that the release was managed to limit political damage. Bondi also said Ghislaine Maxwell should remain in prison for life and should not receive a pardon, but that hard line did little to settle the larger issue: the public still does not know who made the critical redaction decisions, why the files were handled so sloppily, and whether the government is releasing the truth or just carefully rationing pieces of it.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2026/05/29/pam-bondi-epstein-files-congress-testimony-00942272" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bondi shifts responsibility for Epstein files’ release to Todd Blanche, making him Democrats’ next target - POLITICO</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72268027</guid><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 14:48:28 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72268027/bonditestifies.mp3" length="16243191" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/73ef59e8-2909-4a08-bd9e-71aa12486492/73ef59e8-2909-4a08-bd9e-71aa12486492.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/73ef59e8-2909-4a08-bd9e-71aa12486492/73ef59e8-2909-4a08-bd9e-71aa12486492.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/73ef59e8-2909-4a08-bd9e-71aa12486492/73ef59e8-2909-4a08-bd9e-71aa12486492.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Pam Bondi’s closed-door congressional testimony over the Epstein files centered on the same problem that has haunted the entire release process: the Justice Department promised transparency, then delivered a document dump riddled with redactions,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Pam Bondi’s closed-door congressional testimony over the Epstein files centered on the same problem that has haunted the entire release process: the Justice Department promised transparency, then delivered a document dump riddled with redactions, omissions, privacy violations, and unanswered questions. According to the reporting, Bondi defended the DOJ’s handling of the files while acknowledging that there were “redaction errors,” including material that critics say should never have been exposed because it risked identifying victims. She also tried to distance herself from the day-to-day review by saying she delegated much of the process to then-Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, while still insisting the department acted lawfully and responsibly. Democrats came out of the session accusing her of stonewalling, especially when questions turned to Donald Trump, his name appearing in Epstein-related material, and whether the White House influenced what the public did or did not get to see.<br /><br />The testimony also highlighted how much of the Epstein files fight has become a battle over controlled disclosure rather than real accountability. Bondi reportedly refused to answer multiple questions involving Trump, while lawmakers argued that millions of pages still had not been released and that the DOJ’s process protected powerful names while failing survivors. Republicans, including House Oversight Chair James Comer, framed the interview as part of a broader effort to figure out why documents remain withheld, while Democrats said Bondi’s answers only deepened suspicions that the release was managed to limit political damage. Bondi also said Ghislaine Maxwell should remain in prison for life and should not receive a pardon, but that hard line did little to settle the larger issue: the public still does not know who made the critical redaction decisions, why the files were handled so sloppily, and whether the government is releasing the truth or just carefully rationing pieces of it.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2026/05/29/pam-bondi-epstein-files-congress-testimony-00942272" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bondi shifts responsibility for Epstein files’ release to Todd Blanche, making him Democrats’ next target - POLITICO</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1016</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>No Trust, No Testimony: The Epstein Survivors and UK Authorities (6/1/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/no-trust-no-testimony-the-epstein-survivors-and-uk-authorities-6-1-26--72268018</link><description><![CDATA[Women who say they have information about Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor are reportedly reluctant to speak with British police because they do not trust the UK authorities or the British press to treat them properly. Attorney Brad Edwards, who represents many Jeffrey Epstein survivors, told the BBC that multiple clients have information about the former prince but do not want to cooperate with UK investigators, citing two major concerns: the belief that authorities failed to act meaningfully while Epstein was alive, and fear that coming forward would expose them and their families to press harassment. One of Edwards’s clients has alleged she was sent to the UK for a sexual encounter with Andrew at Royal Lodge in 2010, making her the second known woman to allege abuse connected to him in Britain after Virginia Giuffre.<br /><br />The situation also raises serious questions about the UK’s handling of Epstein-related allegations over the years. Thames Valley Police said it had engaged with the woman’s legal team, but her lawyer said she would not communicate with police because of privacy fears. The force has said it could investigate sexual misconduct allegations against Andrew as part of a broader inquiry into alleged misconduct in public office, reportedly linked to claims that he passed sensitive information to Epstein while serving as a UK trade envoy. Attorney Sigrid McCawley, who represented Virginia Giuffre, also told the BBC she did not believe she had received communication from the Metropolitan Police since the DOJ released Epstein files in January, despite representing survivors who may have been trafficked to the UK. Andrew has denied wrongdoing in the past, settled Giuffre’s civil case in 2022 without admitting liability, and has not been charged in connection with these allegations.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c8r8nxvzyljo" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein survivors lack faith in UK police investigating Andrew, says lawyer</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72268018</guid><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72268018/andrewwitnesseswonttalk.mp3" length="12521683" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9558f9a0-c372-4a9f-8e62-41db7eac82b6/9558f9a0-c372-4a9f-8e62-41db7eac82b6.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9558f9a0-c372-4a9f-8e62-41db7eac82b6/9558f9a0-c372-4a9f-8e62-41db7eac82b6.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9558f9a0-c372-4a9f-8e62-41db7eac82b6/9558f9a0-c372-4a9f-8e62-41db7eac82b6.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Women who say they have information about Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor are reportedly reluctant to speak with British police because they do not trust the UK authorities or the British press to treat them properly. Attorney Brad Edwards, who represents...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Women who say they have information about Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor are reportedly reluctant to speak with British police because they do not trust the UK authorities or the British press to treat them properly. Attorney Brad Edwards, who represents many Jeffrey Epstein survivors, told the BBC that multiple clients have information about the former prince but do not want to cooperate with UK investigators, citing two major concerns: the belief that authorities failed to act meaningfully while Epstein was alive, and fear that coming forward would expose them and their families to press harassment. One of Edwards’s clients has alleged she was sent to the UK for a sexual encounter with Andrew at Royal Lodge in 2010, making her the second known woman to allege abuse connected to him in Britain after Virginia Giuffre.<br /><br />The situation also raises serious questions about the UK’s handling of Epstein-related allegations over the years. Thames Valley Police said it had engaged with the woman’s legal team, but her lawyer said she would not communicate with police because of privacy fears. The force has said it could investigate sexual misconduct allegations against Andrew as part of a broader inquiry into alleged misconduct in public office, reportedly linked to claims that he passed sensitive information to Epstein while serving as a UK trade envoy. Attorney Sigrid McCawley, who represented Virginia Giuffre, also told the BBC she did not believe she had received communication from the Metropolitan Police since the DOJ released Epstein files in January, despite representing survivors who may have been trafficked to the UK. Andrew has denied wrongdoing in the past, settled Giuffre’s civil case in 2022 without admitting liability, and has not been charged in connection with these allegations.<br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c8r8nxvzyljo" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein survivors lack faith in UK police investigating Andrew, says lawyer</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>783</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Jeffrey Epstein And His Popularity In Hollywood (6/1/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-his-popularity-in-hollywood-6-1-26--72263671</link><description><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein’s relationship with Woody Allen was not some passing handshake or random name in an address book. Public reporting and released records have described Allen and Soon-Yi Previn as longtime friends and neighbors of Epstein in New York, with the three dining together often and maintaining contact even after Epstein’s 2008 conviction. Newly released emails added more texture to that relationship, including records showing Epstein helped arrange a 2015 White House tour for Allen and Previn. That detail matters because it shows Epstein was not merely tolerated from a distance; he was still useful, still connected, and still treated as someone who could open doors for famous people. Allen has not been accused of criminal wrongdoing in connection with Epstein, but the relationship is still deeply uncomfortable because it fits the broader pattern of Epstein’s post-conviction life: even after becoming a registered sex offender, he remained welcome in elite social circles where fame, money, and access insulated people from ordinary reputational consequences.<br /><br /><br />Epstein’s Hollywood world was part of a much larger celebrity-access machine. His name and records have been connected over the years to actors, comedians, models, producers, media figures, and entertainment-adjacent power brokers, not necessarily as criminal participants, but as people moving through the same rooms, dinners, parties, foundations, flights, introductions, and favor networks. Figures such as Kevin Spacey, Chris Tucker, Naomi Campbell, Chelsea Handler, and others have appeared in public Epstein-related reporting or records in different contexts, while modeling-world connections also show how Epstein used glamour industries as another access point to young women and status. The key point is not that every famous person who encountered Epstein committed a crime; the key point is that Hollywood, like Wall Street, academia, politics, philanthropy, and royalty, was one more prestige ecosystem where Epstein could launder himself socially. He understood that being seen around celebrities created legitimacy, and the entertainment world gave him exactly what he craved: proximity to fame, cultural polish, beautiful people, and the illusion that his criminal past could be buried under enough dinner invitations and famous names.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72263671</guid><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72263671/megaepsteinhollywood.mp3" length="51660689" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1e05d7d1-7a8e-4a81-91cf-e3a2a42f6583/1e05d7d1-7a8e-4a81-91cf-e3a2a42f6583.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1e05d7d1-7a8e-4a81-91cf-e3a2a42f6583/1e05d7d1-7a8e-4a81-91cf-e3a2a42f6583.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/1e05d7d1-7a8e-4a81-91cf-e3a2a42f6583/1e05d7d1-7a8e-4a81-91cf-e3a2a42f6583.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jeffrey Epstein’s relationship with Woody Allen was not some passing handshake or random name in an address book. Public reporting and released records have described Allen and Soon-Yi Previn as longtime friends and neighbors of Epstein in New York,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein’s relationship with Woody Allen was not some passing handshake or random name in an address book. Public reporting and released records have described Allen and Soon-Yi Previn as longtime friends and neighbors of Epstein in New York, with the three dining together often and maintaining contact even after Epstein’s 2008 conviction. Newly released emails added more texture to that relationship, including records showing Epstein helped arrange a 2015 White House tour for Allen and Previn. That detail matters because it shows Epstein was not merely tolerated from a distance; he was still useful, still connected, and still treated as someone who could open doors for famous people. Allen has not been accused of criminal wrongdoing in connection with Epstein, but the relationship is still deeply uncomfortable because it fits the broader pattern of Epstein’s post-conviction life: even after becoming a registered sex offender, he remained welcome in elite social circles where fame, money, and access insulated people from ordinary reputational consequences.<br /><br /><br />Epstein’s Hollywood world was part of a much larger celebrity-access machine. His name and records have been connected over the years to actors, comedians, models, producers, media figures, and entertainment-adjacent power brokers, not necessarily as criminal participants, but as people moving through the same rooms, dinners, parties, foundations, flights, introductions, and favor networks. Figures such as Kevin Spacey, Chris Tucker, Naomi Campbell, Chelsea Handler, and others have appeared in public Epstein-related reporting or records in different contexts, while modeling-world connections also show how Epstein used glamour industries as another access point to young women and status. The key point is not that every famous person who encountered Epstein committed a crime; the key point is that Hollywood, like Wall Street, academia, politics, philanthropy, and royalty, was one more prestige ecosystem where Epstein could launder himself socially. He understood that being seen around celebrities created legitimacy, and the entertainment world gave him exactly what he craved: proximity to fame, cultural polish, beautiful people, and the illusion that his criminal past could be buried under enough dinner invitations and famous names.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3229</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition: Epstein’s Place at the Dubin Table and the Cost of Elite Denial (6/1/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-epstein-s-place-at-the-dubin-table-and-the-cost-of-elite-denial-6-1-26--72263670</link><description><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein’s relationship with the Dubin family was strange because it did not fit the normal pattern of someone being socially exiled after a sex-crime conviction. Eva Andersson-Dubin dated Epstein for roughly a decade before marrying hedge-fund billionaire Glenn Dubin, and Epstein remained close enough to the family that he reportedly described himself as having introduced Eva and Glenn. Even after Epstein’s 2008 conviction, the relationship did not appear to fully collapse; Eva Andersson-Dubin later testified as a defense witness for Ghislaine Maxwell, saying she had remained fond of Epstein and had not personally witnessed inappropriate conduct. Glenn Dubin, meanwhile, was named in Virginia Giuffre’s allegations; Giuffre claimed she was trafficked to him, an allegation he has denied. So the Dubin connection sits in that ugly Epstein gray zone: friendship, money, social access, denial, proximity, and court-record allegations all tangled together in a way that makes the relationship look less like a casual association and more like part of Epstein’s protected elite ecosystem.<br /><br />The most disturbing part of the story is Epstein’s relationship with the Dubins’ daughter, Celina Dubin, whom he knew from childhood and allegedly referred to in an “uncle” type role. Public reporting has said Epstein later told associates he had considered marrying her when she was in her twenties, which is bizarre enough on its own given his prior relationship with her mother and his long-standing place around the family. More recent coverage of released Justice Department files has added even more uncomfortable detail, claiming Epstein showed an intense interest in Celina’s life and education, including communications touching on Harvard and her future. Representatives for Celina have pushed back against suggestions that Epstein was responsible for her academic achievements, calling that implication offensive and unfair. But the core issue remains: Epstein appears to have embedded himself so deeply into the Dubin family’s world that he moved from ex-boyfriend, to family friend, to “uncle”-like presence around a daughter, and then allegedly to someone talking about marriage. That is not merely odd social overlap; it is exactly the kind of boundary-melting access that made Epstein’s orbit so grotesque.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72263670</guid><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72263670/megaepsteinweirdrelationshipdubins.mp3" length="51574147" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/06b83ad2-dd64-4018-83ee-08bf889a1a19/06b83ad2-dd64-4018-83ee-08bf889a1a19.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/06b83ad2-dd64-4018-83ee-08bf889a1a19/06b83ad2-dd64-4018-83ee-08bf889a1a19.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/06b83ad2-dd64-4018-83ee-08bf889a1a19/06b83ad2-dd64-4018-83ee-08bf889a1a19.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jeffrey Epstein’s relationship with the Dubin family was strange because it did not fit the normal pattern of someone being socially exiled after a sex-crime conviction. Eva Andersson-Dubin dated Epstein for roughly a decade before marrying hedge-fund...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein’s relationship with the Dubin family was strange because it did not fit the normal pattern of someone being socially exiled after a sex-crime conviction. Eva Andersson-Dubin dated Epstein for roughly a decade before marrying hedge-fund billionaire Glenn Dubin, and Epstein remained close enough to the family that he reportedly described himself as having introduced Eva and Glenn. Even after Epstein’s 2008 conviction, the relationship did not appear to fully collapse; Eva Andersson-Dubin later testified as a defense witness for Ghislaine Maxwell, saying she had remained fond of Epstein and had not personally witnessed inappropriate conduct. Glenn Dubin, meanwhile, was named in Virginia Giuffre’s allegations; Giuffre claimed she was trafficked to him, an allegation he has denied. So the Dubin connection sits in that ugly Epstein gray zone: friendship, money, social access, denial, proximity, and court-record allegations all tangled together in a way that makes the relationship look less like a casual association and more like part of Epstein’s protected elite ecosystem.<br /><br />The most disturbing part of the story is Epstein’s relationship with the Dubins’ daughter, Celina Dubin, whom he knew from childhood and allegedly referred to in an “uncle” type role. Public reporting has said Epstein later told associates he had considered marrying her when she was in her twenties, which is bizarre enough on its own given his prior relationship with her mother and his long-standing place around the family. More recent coverage of released Justice Department files has added even more uncomfortable detail, claiming Epstein showed an intense interest in Celina’s life and education, including communications touching on Harvard and her future. Representatives for Celina have pushed back against suggestions that Epstein was responsible for her academic achievements, calling that implication offensive and unfair. But the core issue remains: Epstein appears to have embedded himself so deeply into the Dubin family’s world that he moved from ex-boyfriend, to family friend, to “uncle”-like presence around a daughter, and then allegedly to someone talking about marriage. That is not merely odd social overlap; it is exactly the kind of boundary-melting access that made Epstein’s orbit so grotesque.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3224</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Billionaire Playboy's Club...A Memoir  By  Virginia Roberts (Part 9) (5/31/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-billionaire-playboy-s-club-a-memoir-by-virginia-roberts-part-9-5-31-26--72250536</link><description><![CDATA[Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s unpublished memoir The Billionaire’s Playboy Club recounts her recruitment into Jeffrey Epstein’s world as a 16-year-old working at Mar-a-Lago, where she says Ghislaine Maxwell lured her in with promises of opportunity and travel. The manuscript describes how she became trapped in Epstein’s orbit, allegedly forced into sexual encounters with powerful men, including Prince Andrew, and ferried across his properties in New York, Florida, and the Virgin Islands. Giuffre paints a detailed picture of coercion, psychological manipulation, and the disturbing normalization of exploitation within Epstein’s high-society circle.<br /><br /><br />In this episode, we begin our journey through that memoir.   <br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/7010929-Virgina-Giuffre-Billionaire-s-Playboy-Club/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Virgina Giuffre Billionaire's Playboy Club | DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72250536</guid><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72250536/megabillionaireplayboy10.mp3" length="46062489" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5b685b0e-e292-48ab-a3dd-d9564d1be467/5b685b0e-e292-48ab-a3dd-d9564d1be467.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5b685b0e-e292-48ab-a3dd-d9564d1be467/5b685b0e-e292-48ab-a3dd-d9564d1be467.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5b685b0e-e292-48ab-a3dd-d9564d1be467/5b685b0e-e292-48ab-a3dd-d9564d1be467.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s unpublished memoir The Billionaire’s Playboy Club recounts her recruitment into Jeffrey Epstein’s world as a 16-year-old working at Mar-a-Lago, where she says Ghislaine Maxwell lured her in with promises of opportunity and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s unpublished memoir The Billionaire’s Playboy Club recounts her recruitment into Jeffrey Epstein’s world as a 16-year-old working at Mar-a-Lago, where she says Ghislaine Maxwell lured her in with promises of opportunity and travel. The manuscript describes how she became trapped in Epstein’s orbit, allegedly forced into sexual encounters with powerful men, including Prince Andrew, and ferried across his properties in New York, Florida, and the Virgin Islands. Giuffre paints a detailed picture of coercion, psychological manipulation, and the disturbing normalization of exploitation within Epstein’s high-society circle.<br /><br /><br />In this episode, we begin our journey through that memoir.   <br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/7010929-Virgina-Giuffre-Billionaire-s-Playboy-Club/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Virgina Giuffre Billionaire's Playboy Club | DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2879</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Ghislaine Maxwell's Undisputed Statement Of Facts Pursuant To Virginia's Allegations (Part 4)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/ghislaine-maxwell-s-undisputed-statement-of-facts-pursuant-to-virginia-s-allegations-part-4--72227875</link><description><![CDATA[Ghislaine Maxwell’s Rule 56.1 request in the defamation lawsuit brought by Virginia Roberts Giuffre was a procedural move designed to narrow the case before trial by asking the court to treat Maxwell’s version of certain facts as undisputed. Under Local Rule 56.1, parties seeking summary judgment have to lay out the material facts they claim are not genuinely in dispute, with citations to admissible evidence. Maxwell argued that Giuffre’s response failed that test because, in Maxwell’s view, Giuffre did not properly support many of her denials with admissible evidence. Maxwell also objected to Giuffre adding her own supposedly “undisputed facts,” arguing that Giuffre had not filed her own cross-motion for summary judgment and therefore could not use the Rule 56.1 process to smuggle in a competing fact narrative.<br /><br />The request mattered because it was not just a dry filing dispute; it went directly to how Maxwell wanted the court to view the foundation of Giuffre’s claims. Maxwell sought to have several facts deemed admitted, including points about Giuffre’s earlier media interviews, the 2011 and 2015 statements issued on Maxwell’s behalf, the way Giuffre’s allegations appeared in prior court filings, and whether media republication of Maxwell’s denials could legally be pinned on Maxwell. In plain English, Maxwell was trying to box Giuffre in procedurally: if the court accepted Maxwell’s Rule 56.1 position, it would weaken Giuffre’s ability to argue that there were disputed facts requiring a jury trial. But the broader context is that this was part of Maxwell’s aggressive defense strategy in the 2015 defamation case, where Giuffre sued after Maxwell publicly branded her allegations false; the case eventually settled, while the sealed filings later became a major source of Epstein-related disclosures.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72227875</guid><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 04:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72227875/maxstatementfacts4.mp3" length="13323746" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/78cfa76f-0945-4175-aae3-495e01aa74a4/78cfa76f-0945-4175-aae3-495e01aa74a4.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/78cfa76f-0945-4175-aae3-495e01aa74a4/78cfa76f-0945-4175-aae3-495e01aa74a4.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/78cfa76f-0945-4175-aae3-495e01aa74a4/78cfa76f-0945-4175-aae3-495e01aa74a4.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Ghislaine Maxwell’s Rule 56.1 request in the defamation lawsuit brought by Virginia Roberts Giuffre was a procedural move designed to narrow the case before trial by asking the court to treat Maxwell’s version of certain facts as undisputed. Under...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Ghislaine Maxwell’s Rule 56.1 request in the defamation lawsuit brought by Virginia Roberts Giuffre was a procedural move designed to narrow the case before trial by asking the court to treat Maxwell’s version of certain facts as undisputed. Under Local Rule 56.1, parties seeking summary judgment have to lay out the material facts they claim are not genuinely in dispute, with citations to admissible evidence. Maxwell argued that Giuffre’s response failed that test because, in Maxwell’s view, Giuffre did not properly support many of her denials with admissible evidence. Maxwell also objected to Giuffre adding her own supposedly “undisputed facts,” arguing that Giuffre had not filed her own cross-motion for summary judgment and therefore could not use the Rule 56.1 process to smuggle in a competing fact narrative.<br /><br />The request mattered because it was not just a dry filing dispute; it went directly to how Maxwell wanted the court to view the foundation of Giuffre’s claims. Maxwell sought to have several facts deemed admitted, including points about Giuffre’s earlier media interviews, the 2011 and 2015 statements issued on Maxwell’s behalf, the way Giuffre’s allegations appeared in prior court filings, and whether media republication of Maxwell’s denials could legally be pinned on Maxwell. In plain English, Maxwell was trying to box Giuffre in procedurally: if the court accepted Maxwell’s Rule 56.1 position, it would weaken Giuffre’s ability to argue that there were disputed facts requiring a jury trial. But the broader context is that this was part of Maxwell’s aggressive defense strategy in the 2015 defamation case, where Giuffre sued after Maxwell publicly branded her allegations false; the case eventually settled, while the sealed filings later became a major source of Epstein-related disclosures.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>833</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Ghislaine Maxwell's Undisputed Statement Of Facts Pursuant To Virginia's Allegations (Part 3)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/ghislaine-maxwell-s-undisputed-statement-of-facts-pursuant-to-virginia-s-allegations-part-3--72227873</link><description><![CDATA[Ghislaine Maxwell’s Rule 56.1 request in the defamation lawsuit brought by Virginia Roberts Giuffre was a procedural move designed to narrow the case before trial by asking the court to treat Maxwell’s version of certain facts as undisputed. Under Local Rule 56.1, parties seeking summary judgment have to lay out the material facts they claim are not genuinely in dispute, with citations to admissible evidence. Maxwell argued that Giuffre’s response failed that test because, in Maxwell’s view, Giuffre did not properly support many of her denials with admissible evidence. Maxwell also objected to Giuffre adding her own supposedly “undisputed facts,” arguing that Giuffre had not filed her own cross-motion for summary judgment and therefore could not use the Rule 56.1 process to smuggle in a competing fact narrative.<br /><br />The request mattered because it was not just a dry filing dispute; it went directly to how Maxwell wanted the court to view the foundation of Giuffre’s claims. Maxwell sought to have several facts deemed admitted, including points about Giuffre’s earlier media interviews, the 2011 and 2015 statements issued on Maxwell’s behalf, the way Giuffre’s allegations appeared in prior court filings, and whether media republication of Maxwell’s denials could legally be pinned on Maxwell. In plain English, Maxwell was trying to box Giuffre in procedurally: if the court accepted Maxwell’s Rule 56.1 position, it would weaken Giuffre’s ability to argue that there were disputed facts requiring a jury trial. But the broader context is that this was part of Maxwell’s aggressive defense strategy in the 2015 defamation case, where Giuffre sued after Maxwell publicly branded her allegations false; the case eventually settled, while the sealed filings later became a major source of Epstein-related disclosures.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72227873</guid><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 02:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72227873/maxstatementfacts3.mp3" length="14187250" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2b3cc8ac-7e1e-4f2c-a397-df92cfcd7c3a/2b3cc8ac-7e1e-4f2c-a397-df92cfcd7c3a.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2b3cc8ac-7e1e-4f2c-a397-df92cfcd7c3a/2b3cc8ac-7e1e-4f2c-a397-df92cfcd7c3a.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2b3cc8ac-7e1e-4f2c-a397-df92cfcd7c3a/2b3cc8ac-7e1e-4f2c-a397-df92cfcd7c3a.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Ghislaine Maxwell’s Rule 56.1 request in the defamation lawsuit brought by Virginia Roberts Giuffre was a procedural move designed to narrow the case before trial by asking the court to treat Maxwell’s version of certain facts as undisputed. Under...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Ghislaine Maxwell’s Rule 56.1 request in the defamation lawsuit brought by Virginia Roberts Giuffre was a procedural move designed to narrow the case before trial by asking the court to treat Maxwell’s version of certain facts as undisputed. Under Local Rule 56.1, parties seeking summary judgment have to lay out the material facts they claim are not genuinely in dispute, with citations to admissible evidence. Maxwell argued that Giuffre’s response failed that test because, in Maxwell’s view, Giuffre did not properly support many of her denials with admissible evidence. Maxwell also objected to Giuffre adding her own supposedly “undisputed facts,” arguing that Giuffre had not filed her own cross-motion for summary judgment and therefore could not use the Rule 56.1 process to smuggle in a competing fact narrative.<br /><br />The request mattered because it was not just a dry filing dispute; it went directly to how Maxwell wanted the court to view the foundation of Giuffre’s claims. Maxwell sought to have several facts deemed admitted, including points about Giuffre’s earlier media interviews, the 2011 and 2015 statements issued on Maxwell’s behalf, the way Giuffre’s allegations appeared in prior court filings, and whether media republication of Maxwell’s denials could legally be pinned on Maxwell. In plain English, Maxwell was trying to box Giuffre in procedurally: if the court accepted Maxwell’s Rule 56.1 position, it would weaken Giuffre’s ability to argue that there were disputed facts requiring a jury trial. But the broader context is that this was part of Maxwell’s aggressive defense strategy in the 2015 defamation case, where Giuffre sued after Maxwell publicly branded her allegations false; the case eventually settled, while the sealed filings later became a major source of Epstein-related disclosures.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>887</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Ghislaine Maxwell's Undisputed Statement Of Facts Pursuant To Virginia's Allegations (Part 2)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/ghislaine-maxwell-s-undisputed-statement-of-facts-pursuant-to-virginia-s-allegations-part-2--72227867</link><description><![CDATA[Ghislaine Maxwell’s Rule 56.1 request in the defamation lawsuit brought by Virginia Roberts Giuffre was a procedural move designed to narrow the case before trial by asking the court to treat Maxwell’s version of certain facts as undisputed. Under Local Rule 56.1, parties seeking summary judgment have to lay out the material facts they claim are not genuinely in dispute, with citations to admissible evidence. Maxwell argued that Giuffre’s response failed that test because, in Maxwell’s view, Giuffre did not properly support many of her denials with admissible evidence. Maxwell also objected to Giuffre adding her own supposedly “undisputed facts,” arguing that Giuffre had not filed her own cross-motion for summary judgment and therefore could not use the Rule 56.1 process to smuggle in a competing fact narrative.<br /><br />The request mattered because it was not just a dry filing dispute; it went directly to how Maxwell wanted the court to view the foundation of Giuffre’s claims. Maxwell sought to have several facts deemed admitted, including points about Giuffre’s earlier media interviews, the 2011 and 2015 statements issued on Maxwell’s behalf, the way Giuffre’s allegations appeared in prior court filings, and whether media republication of Maxwell’s denials could legally be pinned on Maxwell. In plain English, Maxwell was trying to box Giuffre in procedurally: if the court accepted Maxwell’s Rule 56.1 position, it would weaken Giuffre’s ability to argue that there were disputed facts requiring a jury trial. But the broader context is that this was part of Maxwell’s aggressive defense strategy in the 2015 defamation case, where Giuffre sued after Maxwell publicly branded her allegations false; the case eventually settled, while the sealed filings later became a major source of Epstein-related disclosures.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72227867</guid><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72227867/maxstatementfacts2.mp3" length="12236217" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/472e8bb5-7d27-44e1-bd91-e9d5ec06069d/472e8bb5-7d27-44e1-bd91-e9d5ec06069d.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/472e8bb5-7d27-44e1-bd91-e9d5ec06069d/472e8bb5-7d27-44e1-bd91-e9d5ec06069d.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/472e8bb5-7d27-44e1-bd91-e9d5ec06069d/472e8bb5-7d27-44e1-bd91-e9d5ec06069d.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Ghislaine Maxwell’s Rule 56.1 request in the defamation lawsuit brought by Virginia Roberts Giuffre was a procedural move designed to narrow the case before trial by asking the court to treat Maxwell’s version of certain facts as undisputed. Under...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Ghislaine Maxwell’s Rule 56.1 request in the defamation lawsuit brought by Virginia Roberts Giuffre was a procedural move designed to narrow the case before trial by asking the court to treat Maxwell’s version of certain facts as undisputed. Under Local Rule 56.1, parties seeking summary judgment have to lay out the material facts they claim are not genuinely in dispute, with citations to admissible evidence. Maxwell argued that Giuffre’s response failed that test because, in Maxwell’s view, Giuffre did not properly support many of her denials with admissible evidence. Maxwell also objected to Giuffre adding her own supposedly “undisputed facts,” arguing that Giuffre had not filed her own cross-motion for summary judgment and therefore could not use the Rule 56.1 process to smuggle in a competing fact narrative.<br /><br />The request mattered because it was not just a dry filing dispute; it went directly to how Maxwell wanted the court to view the foundation of Giuffre’s claims. Maxwell sought to have several facts deemed admitted, including points about Giuffre’s earlier media interviews, the 2011 and 2015 statements issued on Maxwell’s behalf, the way Giuffre’s allegations appeared in prior court filings, and whether media republication of Maxwell’s denials could legally be pinned on Maxwell. In plain English, Maxwell was trying to box Giuffre in procedurally: if the court accepted Maxwell’s Rule 56.1 position, it would weaken Giuffre’s ability to argue that there were disputed facts requiring a jury trial. But the broader context is that this was part of Maxwell’s aggressive defense strategy in the 2015 defamation case, where Giuffre sued after Maxwell publicly branded her allegations false; the case eventually settled, while the sealed filings later became a major source of Epstein-related disclosures.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>765</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Ghislaine Maxwell's Undisputed Statement Of Facts Pursuant To Virginia's Allegations (Part 1)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/ghislaine-maxwell-s-undisputed-statement-of-facts-pursuant-to-virginia-s-allegations-part-1--72227874</link><description><![CDATA[Ghislaine Maxwell’s Rule 56.1 request in the defamation lawsuit brought by Virginia Roberts Giuffre was a procedural move designed to narrow the case before trial by asking the court to treat Maxwell’s version of certain facts as undisputed. Under Local Rule 56.1, parties seeking summary judgment have to lay out the material facts they claim are not genuinely in dispute, with citations to admissible evidence. Maxwell argued that Giuffre’s response failed that test because, in Maxwell’s view, Giuffre did not properly support many of her denials with admissible evidence. Maxwell also objected to Giuffre adding her own supposedly “undisputed facts,” arguing that Giuffre had not filed her own cross-motion for summary judgment and therefore could not use the Rule 56.1 process to smuggle in a competing fact narrative.<br /><br />The request mattered because it was not just a dry filing dispute; it went directly to how Maxwell wanted the court to view the foundation of Giuffre’s claims. Maxwell sought to have several facts deemed admitted, including points about Giuffre’s earlier media interviews, the 2011 and 2015 statements issued on Maxwell’s behalf, the way Giuffre’s allegations appeared in prior court filings, and whether media republication of Maxwell’s denials could legally be pinned on Maxwell. In plain English, Maxwell was trying to box Giuffre in procedurally: if the court accepted Maxwell’s Rule 56.1 position, it would weaken Giuffre’s ability to argue that there were disputed facts requiring a jury trial. But the broader context is that this was part of Maxwell’s aggressive defense strategy in the 2015 defamation case, where Giuffre sued after Maxwell publicly branded her allegations false; the case eventually settled, while the sealed filings later became a major source of Epstein-related disclosures.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72227874</guid><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 22:00:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72227874/maxstatementfacts1.mp3" length="12820942" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e2df3acc-62dd-4099-9273-aff199de0f65/e2df3acc-62dd-4099-9273-aff199de0f65.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e2df3acc-62dd-4099-9273-aff199de0f65/e2df3acc-62dd-4099-9273-aff199de0f65.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e2df3acc-62dd-4099-9273-aff199de0f65/e2df3acc-62dd-4099-9273-aff199de0f65.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Ghislaine Maxwell’s Rule 56.1 request in the defamation lawsuit brought by Virginia Roberts Giuffre was a procedural move designed to narrow the case before trial by asking the court to treat Maxwell’s version of certain facts as undisputed. Under...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Ghislaine Maxwell’s Rule 56.1 request in the defamation lawsuit brought by Virginia Roberts Giuffre was a procedural move designed to narrow the case before trial by asking the court to treat Maxwell’s version of certain facts as undisputed. Under Local Rule 56.1, parties seeking summary judgment have to lay out the material facts they claim are not genuinely in dispute, with citations to admissible evidence. Maxwell argued that Giuffre’s response failed that test because, in Maxwell’s view, Giuffre did not properly support many of her denials with admissible evidence. Maxwell also objected to Giuffre adding her own supposedly “undisputed facts,” arguing that Giuffre had not filed her own cross-motion for summary judgment and therefore could not use the Rule 56.1 process to smuggle in a competing fact narrative.<br /><br />The request mattered because it was not just a dry filing dispute; it went directly to how Maxwell wanted the court to view the foundation of Giuffre’s claims. Maxwell sought to have several facts deemed admitted, including points about Giuffre’s earlier media interviews, the 2011 and 2015 statements issued on Maxwell’s behalf, the way Giuffre’s allegations appeared in prior court filings, and whether media republication of Maxwell’s denials could legally be pinned on Maxwell. In plain English, Maxwell was trying to box Giuffre in procedurally: if the court accepted Maxwell’s Rule 56.1 position, it would weaken Giuffre’s ability to argue that there were disputed facts requiring a jury trial. But the broader context is that this was part of Maxwell’s aggressive defense strategy in the 2015 defamation case, where Giuffre sued after Maxwell publicly branded her allegations false; the case eventually settled, while the sealed filings later became a major source of Epstein-related disclosures.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>802</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Captain Of Security Operations At MCC And His OIG Deposition (Part 4) (5/31/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-captain-of-security-operations-at-mcc-and-his-oig-deposition-part-4-5-31-26--72265850</link><description><![CDATA[The document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s death. The captain described the command structure inside the jail, including his role supervising lieutenants and reporting up to associate wardens or the warden, while investigators walked him through staffing, rosters, post assignments, suicide-watch procedures, SHU operations, and the chain of responsibility on August 9–10, 2019. The transcript is important because it does not present Epstein’s death as a clean, orderly institutional event; instead, it shows a jail struggling with bad staffing, confusing handoffs, unfilled posts, questionable paperwork, and a command structure where critical responsibilities appear to have been either missed, misunderstood, or passed around.<br /><br /><br />The most serious value of the interview is in the irregularities it surfaces. The captain reportedly discussed inaccurate rosters or logs, acknowledged questions around skipped SHU rounds, addressed the fact that Epstein had previously been on suicide watch, and said he would not necessarily have known in real time if officers were failing to conduct required checks. Even more troubling, he expressed concern that certain documents may have been deliberately removed from files that should have been reviewed or audited, and investigators also raised an inmate-count issue involving an inmate named Reyes, whose release may not have been properly reflected in the institution’s count — something the captain treated as a protocol violation. Taken together, the transcript adds another layer to the larger Epstein death record: not a single clean explanation, but a bureaucratic mess of missing or questionable documentation, staffing failures, broken supervision, and institutional chaos at precisely the moment when the most high-profile federal inmate in America was supposed to be under careful control.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00111830.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00111830.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72265850</guid><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 20:08:57 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72265850/dardenoig4.mp3" length="12360768" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cf766156-fc7e-4448-827e-56ce408a00d3/cf766156-fc7e-4448-827e-56ce408a00d3.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cf766156-fc7e-4448-827e-56ce408a00d3/cf766156-fc7e-4448-827e-56ce408a00d3.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cf766156-fc7e-4448-827e-56ce408a00d3/cf766156-fc7e-4448-827e-56ce408a00d3.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s death. The captain described the command...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s death. The captain described the command structure inside the jail, including his role supervising lieutenants and reporting up to associate wardens or the warden, while investigators walked him through staffing, rosters, post assignments, suicide-watch procedures, SHU operations, and the chain of responsibility on August 9–10, 2019. The transcript is important because it does not present Epstein’s death as a clean, orderly institutional event; instead, it shows a jail struggling with bad staffing, confusing handoffs, unfilled posts, questionable paperwork, and a command structure where critical responsibilities appear to have been either missed, misunderstood, or passed around.<br /><br /><br />The most serious value of the interview is in the irregularities it surfaces. The captain reportedly discussed inaccurate rosters or logs, acknowledged questions around skipped SHU rounds, addressed the fact that Epstein had previously been on suicide watch, and said he would not necessarily have known in real time if officers were failing to conduct required checks. Even more troubling, he expressed concern that certain documents may have been deliberately removed from files that should have been reviewed or audited, and investigators also raised an inmate-count issue involving an inmate named Reyes, whose release may not have been properly reflected in the institution’s count — something the captain treated as a protocol violation. Taken together, the transcript adds another layer to the larger Epstein death record: not a single clean explanation, but a bureaucratic mess of missing or questionable documentation, staffing failures, broken supervision, and institutional chaos at precisely the moment when the most high-profile federal inmate in America was supposed to be under careful control.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00111830.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00111830.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>773</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Billionaire Playboy's Club...A Memoir  By  Virginia Roberts (Part 8)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-billionaire-playboy-s-club-a-memoir-by-virginia-roberts-part-8--72250537</link><description><![CDATA[Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s unpublished memoir The Billionaire’s Playboy Club recounts her recruitment into Jeffrey Epstein’s world as a 16-year-old working at Mar-a-Lago, where she says Ghislaine Maxwell lured her in with promises of opportunity and travel. The manuscript describes how she became trapped in Epstein’s orbit, allegedly forced into sexual encounters with powerful men, including Prince Andrew, and ferried across his properties in New York, Florida, and the Virgin Islands. Giuffre paints a detailed picture of coercion, psychological manipulation, and the disturbing normalization of exploitation within Epstein’s high-society circle.<br /><br /><br />In this episode, we begin our journey through that memoir.   <br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/7010929-Virgina-Giuffre-Billionaire-s-Playboy-Club/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Virgina Giuffre Billionaire's Playboy Club | DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72250537</guid><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72250537/megabillionaireplayboy8.mp3" length="34325359" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a562c6e5-91be-4e98-9fd2-9d9d10127f35/a562c6e5-91be-4e98-9fd2-9d9d10127f35.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a562c6e5-91be-4e98-9fd2-9d9d10127f35/a562c6e5-91be-4e98-9fd2-9d9d10127f35.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a562c6e5-91be-4e98-9fd2-9d9d10127f35/a562c6e5-91be-4e98-9fd2-9d9d10127f35.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s unpublished memoir The Billionaire’s Playboy Club recounts her recruitment into Jeffrey Epstein’s world as a 16-year-old working at Mar-a-Lago, where she says Ghislaine Maxwell lured her in with promises of opportunity and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s unpublished memoir The Billionaire’s Playboy Club recounts her recruitment into Jeffrey Epstein’s world as a 16-year-old working at Mar-a-Lago, where she says Ghislaine Maxwell lured her in with promises of opportunity and travel. The manuscript describes how she became trapped in Epstein’s orbit, allegedly forced into sexual encounters with powerful men, including Prince Andrew, and ferried across his properties in New York, Florida, and the Virgin Islands. Giuffre paints a detailed picture of coercion, psychological manipulation, and the disturbing normalization of exploitation within Epstein’s high-society circle.<br /><br /><br />In this episode, we begin our journey through that memoir.   <br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/7010929-Virgina-Giuffre-Billionaire-s-Playboy-Club/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Virgina Giuffre Billionaire's Playboy Club | DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2146</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Billionaire Playboy's Club...A Memoir  By  Virginia Roberts (Part 7)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-billionaire-playboy-s-club-a-memoir-by-virginia-roberts-part-7--72250541</link><description><![CDATA[Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s unpublished memoir The Billionaire’s Playboy Club recounts her recruitment into Jeffrey Epstein’s world as a 16-year-old working at Mar-a-Lago, where she says Ghislaine Maxwell lured her in with promises of opportunity and travel. The manuscript describes how she became trapped in Epstein’s orbit, allegedly forced into sexual encounters with powerful men, including Prince Andrew, and ferried across his properties in New York, Florida, and the Virgin Islands. Giuffre paints a detailed picture of coercion, psychological manipulation, and the disturbing normalization of exploitation within Epstein’s high-society circle.<br /><br /><br />In this episode, we begin our journey through that memoir.   <br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/7010929-Virgina-Giuffre-Billionaire-s-Playboy-Club/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Virgina Giuffre Billionaire's Playboy Club | DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72250541</guid><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72250541/megabillionaireplayboypart7.mp3" length="36368344" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/65c7066c-be58-40f9-91ad-643db1aea41d/65c7066c-be58-40f9-91ad-643db1aea41d.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/65c7066c-be58-40f9-91ad-643db1aea41d/65c7066c-be58-40f9-91ad-643db1aea41d.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/65c7066c-be58-40f9-91ad-643db1aea41d/65c7066c-be58-40f9-91ad-643db1aea41d.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s unpublished memoir The Billionaire’s Playboy Club recounts her recruitment into Jeffrey Epstein’s world as a 16-year-old working at Mar-a-Lago, where she says Ghislaine Maxwell lured her in with promises of opportunity and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s unpublished memoir The Billionaire’s Playboy Club recounts her recruitment into Jeffrey Epstein’s world as a 16-year-old working at Mar-a-Lago, where she says Ghislaine Maxwell lured her in with promises of opportunity and travel. The manuscript describes how she became trapped in Epstein’s orbit, allegedly forced into sexual encounters with powerful men, including Prince Andrew, and ferried across his properties in New York, Florida, and the Virgin Islands. Giuffre paints a detailed picture of coercion, psychological manipulation, and the disturbing normalization of exploitation within Epstein’s high-society circle.<br /><br /><br />In this episode, we begin our journey through that memoir.   <br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/7010929-Virgina-Giuffre-Billionaire-s-Playboy-Club/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Virgina Giuffre Billionaire's Playboy Club | DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2273</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Billionaire Playboy's Club...A Memoir  By  Virginia Roberts (Part 6)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-billionaire-playboy-s-club-a-memoir-by-virginia-roberts-part-6--72250538</link><description><![CDATA[Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s unpublished memoir The Billionaire’s Playboy Club recounts her recruitment into Jeffrey Epstein’s world as a 16-year-old working at Mar-a-Lago, where she says Ghislaine Maxwell lured her in with promises of opportunity and travel. The manuscript describes how she became trapped in Epstein’s orbit, allegedly forced into sexual encounters with powerful men, including Prince Andrew, and ferried across his properties in New York, Florida, and the Virgin Islands. Giuffre paints a detailed picture of coercion, psychological manipulation, and the disturbing normalization of exploitation within Epstein’s high-society circle.<br /><br /><br />In this episode, we begin our journey through that memoir.   <br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/7010929-Virgina-Giuffre-Billionaire-s-Playboy-Club/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Virgina Giuffre Billionaire's Playboy Club | DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72250538</guid><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72250538/megabillionairesplayboypart6.mp3" length="35162950" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b015ff8f-ac5d-4804-b254-002996917abe/b015ff8f-ac5d-4804-b254-002996917abe.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b015ff8f-ac5d-4804-b254-002996917abe/b015ff8f-ac5d-4804-b254-002996917abe.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b015ff8f-ac5d-4804-b254-002996917abe/b015ff8f-ac5d-4804-b254-002996917abe.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s unpublished memoir The Billionaire’s Playboy Club recounts her recruitment into Jeffrey Epstein’s world as a 16-year-old working at Mar-a-Lago, where she says Ghislaine Maxwell lured her in with promises of opportunity and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s unpublished memoir The Billionaire’s Playboy Club recounts her recruitment into Jeffrey Epstein’s world as a 16-year-old working at Mar-a-Lago, where she says Ghislaine Maxwell lured her in with promises of opportunity and travel. The manuscript describes how she became trapped in Epstein’s orbit, allegedly forced into sexual encounters with powerful men, including Prince Andrew, and ferried across his properties in New York, Florida, and the Virgin Islands. Giuffre paints a detailed picture of coercion, psychological manipulation, and the disturbing normalization of exploitation within Epstein’s high-society circle.<br /><br /><br />In this episode, we begin our journey through that memoir.   <br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/7010929-Virgina-Giuffre-Billionaire-s-Playboy-Club/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Virgina Giuffre Billionaire's Playboy Club | DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2198</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Billionaire Playboy's Club...A Memoir  By  Virginia Roberts (Part 5)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-billionaire-playboy-s-club-a-memoir-by-virginia-roberts-part-5--72250539</link><description><![CDATA[Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s unpublished memoir The Billionaire’s Playboy Club recounts her recruitment into Jeffrey Epstein’s world as a 16-year-old working at Mar-a-Lago, where she says Ghislaine Maxwell lured her in with promises of opportunity and travel. The manuscript describes how she became trapped in Epstein’s orbit, allegedly forced into sexual encounters with powerful men, including Prince Andrew, and ferried across his properties in New York, Florida, and the Virgin Islands. Giuffre paints a detailed picture of coercion, psychological manipulation, and the disturbing normalization of exploitation within Epstein’s high-society circle.<br /><br /><br />In this episode, we begin our journey through that memoir.   <br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/7010929-Virgina-Giuffre-Billionaire-s-Playboy-Club/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Virgina Giuffre Billionaire's Playboy Club | DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72250539</guid><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72250539/megabillionairesplayboy5.mp3" length="35584253" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ac67913e-33fb-46a4-91ad-2962dfee2b1a/ac67913e-33fb-46a4-91ad-2962dfee2b1a.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ac67913e-33fb-46a4-91ad-2962dfee2b1a/ac67913e-33fb-46a4-91ad-2962dfee2b1a.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ac67913e-33fb-46a4-91ad-2962dfee2b1a/ac67913e-33fb-46a4-91ad-2962dfee2b1a.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s unpublished memoir The Billionaire’s Playboy Club recounts her recruitment into Jeffrey Epstein’s world as a 16-year-old working at Mar-a-Lago, where she says Ghislaine Maxwell lured her in with promises of opportunity and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s unpublished memoir The Billionaire’s Playboy Club recounts her recruitment into Jeffrey Epstein’s world as a 16-year-old working at Mar-a-Lago, where she says Ghislaine Maxwell lured her in with promises of opportunity and travel. The manuscript describes how she became trapped in Epstein’s orbit, allegedly forced into sexual encounters with powerful men, including Prince Andrew, and ferried across his properties in New York, Florida, and the Virgin Islands. Giuffre paints a detailed picture of coercion, psychological manipulation, and the disturbing normalization of exploitation within Epstein’s high-society circle.<br /><br /><br />In this episode, we begin our journey through that memoir.   <br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/7010929-Virgina-Giuffre-Billionaire-s-Playboy-Club/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Virgina Giuffre Billionaire's Playboy Club | DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2224</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Billionaire Playboy's Club...A Memoir  By  Virginia Roberts (Part 4)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-billionaire-playboy-s-club-a-memoir-by-virginia-roberts-part-4--72250540</link><description><![CDATA[Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s unpublished memoir The Billionaire’s Playboy Club recounts her recruitment into Jeffrey Epstein’s world as a 16-year-old working at Mar-a-Lago, where she says Ghislaine Maxwell lured her in with promises of opportunity and travel. The manuscript describes how she became trapped in Epstein’s orbit, allegedly forced into sexual encounters with powerful men, including Prince Andrew, and ferried across his properties in New York, Florida, and the Virgin Islands. Giuffre paints a detailed picture of coercion, psychological manipulation, and the disturbing normalization of exploitation within Epstein’s high-society circle.<br /><br /><br />In this episode, we begin our journey through that memoir.   <br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/7010929-Virgina-Giuffre-Billionaire-s-Playboy-Club/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Virgina Giuffre Billionaire's Playboy Club | DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72250540</guid><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72250540/megabillionaireplayboypart4.mp3" length="38739426" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8899d539-a7c6-43a9-90df-e4fd2fbca808/8899d539-a7c6-43a9-90df-e4fd2fbca808.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8899d539-a7c6-43a9-90df-e4fd2fbca808/8899d539-a7c6-43a9-90df-e4fd2fbca808.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8899d539-a7c6-43a9-90df-e4fd2fbca808/8899d539-a7c6-43a9-90df-e4fd2fbca808.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s unpublished memoir The Billionaire’s Playboy Club recounts her recruitment into Jeffrey Epstein’s world as a 16-year-old working at Mar-a-Lago, where she says Ghislaine Maxwell lured her in with promises of opportunity and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s unpublished memoir The Billionaire’s Playboy Club recounts her recruitment into Jeffrey Epstein’s world as a 16-year-old working at Mar-a-Lago, where she says Ghislaine Maxwell lured her in with promises of opportunity and travel. The manuscript describes how she became trapped in Epstein’s orbit, allegedly forced into sexual encounters with powerful men, including Prince Andrew, and ferried across his properties in New York, Florida, and the Virgin Islands. Giuffre paints a detailed picture of coercion, psychological manipulation, and the disturbing normalization of exploitation within Epstein’s high-society circle.<br /><br /><br />In this episode, we begin our journey through that memoir.   <br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/7010929-Virgina-Giuffre-Billionaire-s-Playboy-Club/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Virgina Giuffre Billionaire's Playboy Club | DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2422</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Virginia Roberts 2nd Amended Response To Ghislaine Maxwell's 1st Discovery Request (Part 6)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/virginia-roberts-2nd-amended-response-to-ghislaine-maxwell-s-1st-discovery-request-part-6--72211357</link><description><![CDATA[Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s unpublished memoir The Billionaire’s Playboy Club recounts her recruitment into Jeffrey Epstein’s world as a 16-year-old working at Mar-a-Lago, where she says Ghislaine Maxwell lured her in with promises of opportunity and travel. The manuscript describes how she became trapped in Epstein’s orbit, allegedly forced into sexual encounters with powerful men, including Prince Andrew, and ferried across his properties in New York, Florida, and the Virgin Islands. Giuffre paints a detailed picture of coercion, psychological manipulation, and the disturbing normalization of exploitation within Epstein’s high-society circle.<br /><br /><br />In this episode, we begin our journey through that memoir.   <br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/7010929-Virgina-Giuffre-Billionaire-s-Playboy-Club/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Virgina Giuffre Billionaire's Playboy Club | DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72211357</guid><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 04:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72211357/virg2ndamenddisc6.mp3" length="15821471" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/086639e9-54ac-4d3f-a840-c1de567c1839/086639e9-54ac-4d3f-a840-c1de567c1839.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/086639e9-54ac-4d3f-a840-c1de567c1839/086639e9-54ac-4d3f-a840-c1de567c1839.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/086639e9-54ac-4d3f-a840-c1de567c1839/086639e9-54ac-4d3f-a840-c1de567c1839.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s unpublished memoir The Billionaire’s Playboy Club recounts her recruitment into Jeffrey Epstein’s world as a 16-year-old working at Mar-a-Lago, where she says Ghislaine Maxwell lured her in with promises of opportunity and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s unpublished memoir The Billionaire’s Playboy Club recounts her recruitment into Jeffrey Epstein’s world as a 16-year-old working at Mar-a-Lago, where she says Ghislaine Maxwell lured her in with promises of opportunity and travel. The manuscript describes how she became trapped in Epstein’s orbit, allegedly forced into sexual encounters with powerful men, including Prince Andrew, and ferried across his properties in New York, Florida, and the Virgin Islands. Giuffre paints a detailed picture of coercion, psychological manipulation, and the disturbing normalization of exploitation within Epstein’s high-society circle.<br /><br /><br />In this episode, we begin our journey through that memoir.   <br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/7010929-Virgina-Giuffre-Billionaire-s-Playboy-Club/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Virgina Giuffre Billionaire's Playboy Club | DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>989</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Virginia Roberts 2nd Amended Response To Ghislaine Maxwell's 1st Discovery Request (Part 5)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/virginia-roberts-2nd-amended-response-to-ghislaine-maxwell-s-1st-discovery-request-part-5--72211356</link><description><![CDATA[Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s unpublished memoir The Billionaire’s Playboy Club recounts her recruitment into Jeffrey Epstein’s world as a 16-year-old working at Mar-a-Lago, where she says Ghislaine Maxwell lured her in with promises of opportunity and travel. The manuscript describes how she became trapped in Epstein’s orbit, allegedly forced into sexual encounters with powerful men, including Prince Andrew, and ferried across his properties in New York, Florida, and the Virgin Islands. Giuffre paints a detailed picture of coercion, psychological manipulation, and the disturbing normalization of exploitation within Epstein’s high-society circle.<br /><br /><br />In this episode, we begin our journey through that memoir.   <br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/7010929-Virgina-Giuffre-Billionaire-s-Playboy-Club/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Virgina Giuffre Billionaire's Playboy Club | DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72211356</guid><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 02:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72211356/virg2ndamenddisc5.mp3" length="11220158" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/67106b75-4b16-4dcb-a017-0f02d455212e/67106b75-4b16-4dcb-a017-0f02d455212e.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/67106b75-4b16-4dcb-a017-0f02d455212e/67106b75-4b16-4dcb-a017-0f02d455212e.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/67106b75-4b16-4dcb-a017-0f02d455212e/67106b75-4b16-4dcb-a017-0f02d455212e.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s unpublished memoir The Billionaire’s Playboy Club recounts her recruitment into Jeffrey Epstein’s world as a 16-year-old working at Mar-a-Lago, where she says Ghislaine Maxwell lured her in with promises of opportunity and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s unpublished memoir The Billionaire’s Playboy Club recounts her recruitment into Jeffrey Epstein’s world as a 16-year-old working at Mar-a-Lago, where she says Ghislaine Maxwell lured her in with promises of opportunity and travel. The manuscript describes how she became trapped in Epstein’s orbit, allegedly forced into sexual encounters with powerful men, including Prince Andrew, and ferried across his properties in New York, Florida, and the Virgin Islands. Giuffre paints a detailed picture of coercion, psychological manipulation, and the disturbing normalization of exploitation within Epstein’s high-society circle.<br /><br /><br />In this episode, we begin our journey through that memoir.   <br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/7010929-Virgina-Giuffre-Billionaire-s-Playboy-Club/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Virgina Giuffre Billionaire's Playboy Club | DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>702</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Virginia Roberts 2nd Amended Response To Ghislaine Maxwell's 1st Discovery Request (Part 4)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/virginia-roberts-2nd-amended-response-to-ghislaine-maxwell-s-1st-discovery-request-part-4--72211358</link><description><![CDATA[Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s unpublished memoir The Billionaire’s Playboy Club recounts her recruitment into Jeffrey Epstein’s world as a 16-year-old working at Mar-a-Lago, where she says Ghislaine Maxwell lured her in with promises of opportunity and travel. The manuscript describes how she became trapped in Epstein’s orbit, allegedly forced into sexual encounters with powerful men, including Prince Andrew, and ferried across his properties in New York, Florida, and the Virgin Islands. Giuffre paints a detailed picture of coercion, psychological manipulation, and the disturbing normalization of exploitation within Epstein’s high-society circle.<br /><br /><br />In this episode, we begin our journey through that memoir.   <br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/7010929-Virgina-Giuffre-Billionaire-s-Playboy-Club/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Virgina Giuffre Billionaire's Playboy Club | DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72211358</guid><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 00:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72211358/virg2ndamenddisc4.mp3" length="10703560" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/46e79575-8f19-4cb7-aee2-b434d4dc0e87/46e79575-8f19-4cb7-aee2-b434d4dc0e87.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/46e79575-8f19-4cb7-aee2-b434d4dc0e87/46e79575-8f19-4cb7-aee2-b434d4dc0e87.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/46e79575-8f19-4cb7-aee2-b434d4dc0e87/46e79575-8f19-4cb7-aee2-b434d4dc0e87.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s unpublished memoir The Billionaire’s Playboy Club recounts her recruitment into Jeffrey Epstein’s world as a 16-year-old working at Mar-a-Lago, where she says Ghislaine Maxwell lured her in with promises of opportunity and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s unpublished memoir The Billionaire’s Playboy Club recounts her recruitment into Jeffrey Epstein’s world as a 16-year-old working at Mar-a-Lago, where she says Ghislaine Maxwell lured her in with promises of opportunity and travel. The manuscript describes how she became trapped in Epstein’s orbit, allegedly forced into sexual encounters with powerful men, including Prince Andrew, and ferried across his properties in New York, Florida, and the Virgin Islands. Giuffre paints a detailed picture of coercion, psychological manipulation, and the disturbing normalization of exploitation within Epstein’s high-society circle.<br /><br /><br />In this episode, we begin our journey through that memoir.   <br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/7010929-Virgina-Giuffre-Billionaire-s-Playboy-Club/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Virgina Giuffre Billionaire's Playboy Club | DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>669</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>In Their Own Words:   Annie Farmer's Survivor Impact Statement At Ghislaine Maxwell's Sentencing</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/in-their-own-words-annie-farmer-s-survivor-impact-statement-at-ghislaine-maxwell-s-sentencing--72211368</link><description><![CDATA[At Ghislaine Maxwell’s sentencing in June 2022, survivors delivered powerful and emotional victim impact statements that left no doubt about the damage she had inflicted. One woman stated plainly, “I never would have met Jeffrey Epstein if not for you,” holding Maxwell personally responsible for the years of abuse that followed. Another described her as a “monster,” recounting how Maxwell’s grooming, manipulation, and betrayal left her permanently scarred. The survivors spoke about shattered lives, ruined trust, and emotional damage that will never fully heal. Maxwell wasn’t a passive bystander—she was the architect of their exploitation, intimately involved in luring and preparing underage girls for sexual abuse under the guise of mentorship and opportunity.<br /><br />Anyone attempting to refurbish Maxwell’s image would do well to stop and truly absorb what she did—and who she did it to. These weren’t abstract victims or peripheral crimes. They were calculated acts committed against vulnerable girls, many of whom were already struggling. Maxwell used charm, privilege, and social power as tools of entrapment, playing the role of the "trusted woman" to disarm and deliver victims to a predator. Her refusal to accept responsibility, her lies under oath, and her ongoing lack of remorse only deepen the stain of her crimes.There can be no public rehabilitation due the wreckage she left behind.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.539612/gov.uscourts.nysd.539612.779.0.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">M6SQmaxSF</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72211368</guid><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 22:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72211368/annieimpactstatement_2.mp3" length="11482636" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f6e55c38-721e-4d4c-8428-d7d30a01fcce/f6e55c38-721e-4d4c-8428-d7d30a01fcce.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f6e55c38-721e-4d4c-8428-d7d30a01fcce/f6e55c38-721e-4d4c-8428-d7d30a01fcce.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f6e55c38-721e-4d4c-8428-d7d30a01fcce/f6e55c38-721e-4d4c-8428-d7d30a01fcce.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>At Ghislaine Maxwell’s sentencing in June 2022, survivors delivered powerful and emotional victim impact statements that left no doubt about the damage she had inflicted. One woman stated plainly, “I never would have met Jeffrey Epstein if not for...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[At Ghislaine Maxwell’s sentencing in June 2022, survivors delivered powerful and emotional victim impact statements that left no doubt about the damage she had inflicted. One woman stated plainly, “I never would have met Jeffrey Epstein if not for you,” holding Maxwell personally responsible for the years of abuse that followed. Another described her as a “monster,” recounting how Maxwell’s grooming, manipulation, and betrayal left her permanently scarred. The survivors spoke about shattered lives, ruined trust, and emotional damage that will never fully heal. Maxwell wasn’t a passive bystander—she was the architect of their exploitation, intimately involved in luring and preparing underage girls for sexual abuse under the guise of mentorship and opportunity.<br /><br />Anyone attempting to refurbish Maxwell’s image would do well to stop and truly absorb what she did—and who she did it to. These weren’t abstract victims or peripheral crimes. They were calculated acts committed against vulnerable girls, many of whom were already struggling. Maxwell used charm, privilege, and social power as tools of entrapment, playing the role of the "trusted woman" to disarm and deliver victims to a predator. Her refusal to accept responsibility, her lies under oath, and her ongoing lack of remorse only deepen the stain of her crimes.There can be no public rehabilitation due the wreckage she left behind.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.539612/gov.uscourts.nysd.539612.779.0.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">M6SQmaxSF</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>718</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Captain Of Security Operations At MCC And His OIG Deposition (Part 3) (5/30/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-captain-of-security-operations-at-mcc-and-his-oig-deposition-part-3-5-30-26--72250199</link><description><![CDATA[The document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s death. The captain described the command structure inside the jail, including his role supervising lieutenants and reporting up to associate wardens or the warden, while investigators walked him through staffing, rosters, post assignments, suicide-watch procedures, SHU operations, and the chain of responsibility on August 9–10, 2019. The transcript is important because it does not present Epstein’s death as a clean, orderly institutional event; instead, it shows a jail struggling with bad staffing, confusing handoffs, unfilled posts, questionable paperwork, and a command structure where critical responsibilities appear to have been either missed, misunderstood, or passed around.<br /><br /><br />The most serious value of the interview is in the irregularities it surfaces. The captain reportedly discussed inaccurate rosters or logs, acknowledged questions around skipped SHU rounds, addressed the fact that Epstein had previously been on suicide watch, and said he would not necessarily have known in real time if officers were failing to conduct required checks. Even more troubling, he expressed concern that certain documents may have been deliberately removed from files that should have been reviewed or audited, and investigators also raised an inmate-count issue involving an inmate named Reyes, whose release may not have been properly reflected in the institution’s count — something the captain treated as a protocol violation. Taken together, the transcript adds another layer to the larger Epstein death record: not a single clean explanation, but a bureaucratic mess of missing or questionable documentation, staffing failures, broken supervision, and institutional chaos at precisely the moment when the most high-profile federal inmate in America was supposed to be under careful control.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00111830.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00111830.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72250199</guid><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72250199/dardenoig3.mp3" length="16626460" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a6b439d4-8a31-4abd-818a-4528c27c4b0a/a6b439d4-8a31-4abd-818a-4528c27c4b0a.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a6b439d4-8a31-4abd-818a-4528c27c4b0a/a6b439d4-8a31-4abd-818a-4528c27c4b0a.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a6b439d4-8a31-4abd-818a-4528c27c4b0a/a6b439d4-8a31-4abd-818a-4528c27c4b0a.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s death. The captain described the command...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s death. The captain described the command structure inside the jail, including his role supervising lieutenants and reporting up to associate wardens or the warden, while investigators walked him through staffing, rosters, post assignments, suicide-watch procedures, SHU operations, and the chain of responsibility on August 9–10, 2019. The transcript is important because it does not present Epstein’s death as a clean, orderly institutional event; instead, it shows a jail struggling with bad staffing, confusing handoffs, unfilled posts, questionable paperwork, and a command structure where critical responsibilities appear to have been either missed, misunderstood, or passed around.<br /><br /><br />The most serious value of the interview is in the irregularities it surfaces. The captain reportedly discussed inaccurate rosters or logs, acknowledged questions around skipped SHU rounds, addressed the fact that Epstein had previously been on suicide watch, and said he would not necessarily have known in real time if officers were failing to conduct required checks. Even more troubling, he expressed concern that certain documents may have been deliberately removed from files that should have been reviewed or audited, and investigators also raised an inmate-count issue involving an inmate named Reyes, whose release may not have been properly reflected in the institution’s count — something the captain treated as a protocol violation. Taken together, the transcript adds another layer to the larger Epstein death record: not a single clean explanation, but a bureaucratic mess of missing or questionable documentation, staffing failures, broken supervision, and institutional chaos at precisely the moment when the most high-profile federal inmate in America was supposed to be under careful control.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00111830.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00111830.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1040</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Captain Of Security Operations At MCC And His OIG Deposition (Part 2) (5/30/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-captain-of-security-operations-at-mcc-and-his-oig-deposition-part-2-5-30-26--72249815</link><description><![CDATA[The document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s death. The captain described the command structure inside the jail, including his role supervising lieutenants and reporting up to associate wardens or the warden, while investigators walked him through staffing, rosters, post assignments, suicide-watch procedures, SHU operations, and the chain of responsibility on August 9–10, 2019. The transcript is important because it does not present Epstein’s death as a clean, orderly institutional event; instead, it shows a jail struggling with bad staffing, confusing handoffs, unfilled posts, questionable paperwork, and a command structure where critical responsibilities appear to have been either missed, misunderstood, or passed around.<br /><br /><br />The most serious value of the interview is in the irregularities it surfaces. The captain reportedly discussed inaccurate rosters or logs, acknowledged questions around skipped SHU rounds, addressed the fact that Epstein had previously been on suicide watch, and said he would not necessarily have known in real time if officers were failing to conduct required checks. Even more troubling, he expressed concern that certain documents may have been deliberately removed from files that should have been reviewed or audited, and investigators also raised an inmate-count issue involving an inmate named Reyes, whose release may not have been properly reflected in the institution’s count — something the captain treated as a protocol violation. Taken together, the transcript adds another layer to the larger Epstein death record: not a single clean explanation, but a bureaucratic mess of missing or questionable documentation, staffing failures, broken supervision, and institutional chaos at precisely the moment when the most high-profile federal inmate in America was supposed to be under careful control.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00111830.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00111830.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72249815</guid><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 18:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72249815/dardenoig2.mp3" length="13159071" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2f1cc4a9-0879-44d9-b023-5e4d6749cfe6/2f1cc4a9-0879-44d9-b023-5e4d6749cfe6.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2f1cc4a9-0879-44d9-b023-5e4d6749cfe6/2f1cc4a9-0879-44d9-b023-5e4d6749cfe6.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2f1cc4a9-0879-44d9-b023-5e4d6749cfe6/2f1cc4a9-0879-44d9-b023-5e4d6749cfe6.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s death. The captain described the command...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s death. The captain described the command structure inside the jail, including his role supervising lieutenants and reporting up to associate wardens or the warden, while investigators walked him through staffing, rosters, post assignments, suicide-watch procedures, SHU operations, and the chain of responsibility on August 9–10, 2019. The transcript is important because it does not present Epstein’s death as a clean, orderly institutional event; instead, it shows a jail struggling with bad staffing, confusing handoffs, unfilled posts, questionable paperwork, and a command structure where critical responsibilities appear to have been either missed, misunderstood, or passed around.<br /><br /><br />The most serious value of the interview is in the irregularities it surfaces. The captain reportedly discussed inaccurate rosters or logs, acknowledged questions around skipped SHU rounds, addressed the fact that Epstein had previously been on suicide watch, and said he would not necessarily have known in real time if officers were failing to conduct required checks. Even more troubling, he expressed concern that certain documents may have been deliberately removed from files that should have been reviewed or audited, and investigators also raised an inmate-count issue involving an inmate named Reyes, whose release may not have been properly reflected in the institution’s count — something the captain treated as a protocol violation. Taken together, the transcript adds another layer to the larger Epstein death record: not a single clean explanation, but a bureaucratic mess of missing or questionable documentation, staffing failures, broken supervision, and institutional chaos at precisely the moment when the most high-profile federal inmate in America was supposed to be under careful control.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00111830.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00111830.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>823</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Strange Arrangement That Kept Andrew and Sarah Ferguson Tied Together (5/30/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-strange-arrangement-that-kept-andrew-and-sarah-ferguson-tied-together-5-30-26--72249825</link><description><![CDATA[Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and Sarah Ferguson are being portrayed as a scandal-bound royal duo whose relationship long outlived their marriage because it benefited both of them. Royal author Andrew Lownie describes them as the royal family’s “Bonnie and Clyde,” arguing that their post-divorce bond was built around mutual loyalty, shared self-interest, financial survival, and the preservation of status. Andrew gave Sarah continued access to royal proximity, prestige, and money-making opportunities, while Sarah remained fiercely loyal to Andrew even as his public image collapsed. Their history includes the 1986 wedding, the 1996 divorce, tabloid scandals, Andrew’s reputation as “Air Miles Andy” and “Randy Andy,” Sarah’s own controversies, and the unusual fact that they continued living closely together long after their marriage ended.<br /><br />The Epstein fallout has turned that long-running royal arrangement into something far more damaging. Andrew’s friendship with Jeffrey Epstein, Virginia Giuffre’s allegations, his disastrous Newsnight interview, the loss of his royal duties and titles, and years of public scrutiny have made his name toxic. Sarah has also been pulled back into the scandal because of her own past dealings with Epstein, including accepting money from him after publicly condemning him. The broader point is that Andrew and Sarah’s relationship now looks less like eccentric royal loyalty and more like a survival pact between two people trapped inside the same reputational wreckage. What once played as tabloid weirdness has become part of the larger Epstein stain on the House of York.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/former-prince-andrew-sarah-ferguson-dubbed-royal-familys-bonnie-clyde-epstein-fallout-grows-author" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Former Prince Andrew, Fergie were 'Bonnie and Clyde' of royal scandal: author | Fox News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72249825</guid><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72249825/andrewfergiebonnieclyde.mp3" length="16352279" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0f99351f-e6e1-49eb-af4f-9e64b684f9c1/0f99351f-e6e1-49eb-af4f-9e64b684f9c1.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0f99351f-e6e1-49eb-af4f-9e64b684f9c1/0f99351f-e6e1-49eb-af4f-9e64b684f9c1.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0f99351f-e6e1-49eb-af4f-9e64b684f9c1/0f99351f-e6e1-49eb-af4f-9e64b684f9c1.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and Sarah Ferguson are being portrayed as a scandal-bound royal duo whose relationship long outlived their marriage because it benefited both of them. Royal author Andrew Lownie describes them as the royal family’s “Bonnie...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and Sarah Ferguson are being portrayed as a scandal-bound royal duo whose relationship long outlived their marriage because it benefited both of them. Royal author Andrew Lownie describes them as the royal family’s “Bonnie and Clyde,” arguing that their post-divorce bond was built around mutual loyalty, shared self-interest, financial survival, and the preservation of status. Andrew gave Sarah continued access to royal proximity, prestige, and money-making opportunities, while Sarah remained fiercely loyal to Andrew even as his public image collapsed. Their history includes the 1986 wedding, the 1996 divorce, tabloid scandals, Andrew’s reputation as “Air Miles Andy” and “Randy Andy,” Sarah’s own controversies, and the unusual fact that they continued living closely together long after their marriage ended.<br /><br />The Epstein fallout has turned that long-running royal arrangement into something far more damaging. Andrew’s friendship with Jeffrey Epstein, Virginia Giuffre’s allegations, his disastrous Newsnight interview, the loss of his royal duties and titles, and years of public scrutiny have made his name toxic. Sarah has also been pulled back into the scandal because of her own past dealings with Epstein, including accepting money from him after publicly condemning him. The broader point is that Andrew and Sarah’s relationship now looks less like eccentric royal loyalty and more like a survival pact between two people trapped inside the same reputational wreckage. What once played as tabloid weirdness has become part of the larger Epstein stain on the House of York.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/former-prince-andrew-sarah-ferguson-dubbed-royal-familys-bonnie-clyde-epstein-fallout-grows-author" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Former Prince Andrew, Fergie were 'Bonnie and Clyde' of royal scandal: author | Fox News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1022</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Billionaire Playboy's Club...A Memoir  By  Virginia Roberts (Part 3)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-billionaire-playboy-s-club-a-memoir-by-virginia-roberts-part-3--72227526</link><description><![CDATA[Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s unpublished memoir The Billionaire’s Playboy Club recounts her recruitment into Jeffrey Epstein’s world as a 16-year-old working at Mar-a-Lago, where she says Ghislaine Maxwell lured her in with promises of opportunity and travel. The manuscript describes how she became trapped in Epstein’s orbit, allegedly forced into sexual encounters with powerful men, including Prince Andrew, and ferried across his properties in New York, Florida, and the Virgin Islands. Giuffre paints a detailed picture of coercion, psychological manipulation, and the disturbing normalization of exploitation within Epstein’s high-society circle.<br /><br /><br />In this episode, we begin our journey through that memoir.   <br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/7010929-Virgina-Giuffre-Billionaire-s-Playboy-Club/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Virgina Giuffre Billionaire's Playboy Club | DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72227526</guid><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72227526/megabillionplayboy3.mp3" length="39487573" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/dc117071-35db-47a7-8688-633fc4bdef1c/dc117071-35db-47a7-8688-633fc4bdef1c.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/dc117071-35db-47a7-8688-633fc4bdef1c/dc117071-35db-47a7-8688-633fc4bdef1c.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/dc117071-35db-47a7-8688-633fc4bdef1c/dc117071-35db-47a7-8688-633fc4bdef1c.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s unpublished memoir The Billionaire’s Playboy Club recounts her recruitment into Jeffrey Epstein’s world as a 16-year-old working at Mar-a-Lago, where she says Ghislaine Maxwell lured her in with promises of opportunity and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s unpublished memoir The Billionaire’s Playboy Club recounts her recruitment into Jeffrey Epstein’s world as a 16-year-old working at Mar-a-Lago, where she says Ghislaine Maxwell lured her in with promises of opportunity and travel. The manuscript describes how she became trapped in Epstein’s orbit, allegedly forced into sexual encounters with powerful men, including Prince Andrew, and ferried across his properties in New York, Florida, and the Virgin Islands. Giuffre paints a detailed picture of coercion, psychological manipulation, and the disturbing normalization of exploitation within Epstein’s high-society circle.<br /><br /><br />In this episode, we begin our journey through that memoir.   <br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/7010929-Virgina-Giuffre-Billionaire-s-Playboy-Club/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Virgina Giuffre Billionaire's Playboy Club | DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2468</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Billionaire Playboy's Club...A Memoir  By  Virginia Roberts (Part 2)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-billionaire-playboy-s-club-a-memoir-by-virginia-roberts-part-2--72227524</link><description><![CDATA[Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s unpublished memoir The Billionaire’s Playboy Club recounts her recruitment into Jeffrey Epstein’s world as a 16-year-old working at Mar-a-Lago, where she says Ghislaine Maxwell lured her in with promises of opportunity and travel. The manuscript describes how she became trapped in Epstein’s orbit, allegedly forced into sexual encounters with powerful men, including Prince Andrew, and ferried across his properties in New York, Florida, and the Virgin Islands. Giuffre paints a detailed picture of coercion, psychological manipulation, and the disturbing normalization of exploitation within Epstein’s high-society circle.<br /><br /><br />In this episode, we begin our journey through that memoir.   <br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/7010929-Virgina-Giuffre-Billionaire-s-Playboy-Club/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Virgina Giuffre Billionaire's Playboy Club | DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72227524</guid><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 12:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72227524/megabillionplayboypart2.mp3" length="36993611" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/21a149c1-8818-49dd-b164-020879944a07/21a149c1-8818-49dd-b164-020879944a07.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/21a149c1-8818-49dd-b164-020879944a07/21a149c1-8818-49dd-b164-020879944a07.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/21a149c1-8818-49dd-b164-020879944a07/21a149c1-8818-49dd-b164-020879944a07.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s unpublished memoir The Billionaire’s Playboy Club recounts her recruitment into Jeffrey Epstein’s world as a 16-year-old working at Mar-a-Lago, where she says Ghislaine Maxwell lured her in with promises of opportunity and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s unpublished memoir The Billionaire’s Playboy Club recounts her recruitment into Jeffrey Epstein’s world as a 16-year-old working at Mar-a-Lago, where she says Ghislaine Maxwell lured her in with promises of opportunity and travel. The manuscript describes how she became trapped in Epstein’s orbit, allegedly forced into sexual encounters with powerful men, including Prince Andrew, and ferried across his properties in New York, Florida, and the Virgin Islands. Giuffre paints a detailed picture of coercion, psychological manipulation, and the disturbing normalization of exploitation within Epstein’s high-society circle.<br /><br /><br />In this episode, we begin our journey through that memoir.   <br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/7010929-Virgina-Giuffre-Billionaire-s-Playboy-Club/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Virgina Giuffre Billionaire's Playboy Club | DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2313</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Billionaire Playboy's Club...A Memoir  By  Virginia Roberts (Part 1)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-billionaire-playboy-s-club-a-memoir-by-virginia-roberts-part-1--72227525</link><description><![CDATA[Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s unpublished memoir The Billionaire’s Playboy Club recounts her recruitment into Jeffrey Epstein’s world as a 16-year-old working at Mar-a-Lago, where she says Ghislaine Maxwell lured her in with promises of opportunity and travel. The manuscript describes how she became trapped in Epstein’s orbit, allegedly forced into sexual encounters with powerful men, including Prince Andrew, and ferried across his properties in New York, Florida, and the Virgin Islands. Giuffre paints a detailed picture of coercion, psychological manipulation, and the disturbing normalization of exploitation within Epstein’s high-society circle.<br /><br /><br />In this episode, we begin our journey through that memoir.   <br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/7010929-Virgina-Giuffre-Billionaire-s-Playboy-Club/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Virgina Giuffre Billionaire's Playboy Club | DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72227525</guid><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 10:00:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72227525/megabillionplayboypart1.mp3" length="33543358" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/591919b2-d06e-4afa-81a3-20dbce579beb/591919b2-d06e-4afa-81a3-20dbce579beb.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/591919b2-d06e-4afa-81a3-20dbce579beb/591919b2-d06e-4afa-81a3-20dbce579beb.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/591919b2-d06e-4afa-81a3-20dbce579beb/591919b2-d06e-4afa-81a3-20dbce579beb.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s unpublished memoir The Billionaire’s Playboy Club recounts her recruitment into Jeffrey Epstein’s world as a 16-year-old working at Mar-a-Lago, where she says Ghislaine Maxwell lured her in with promises of opportunity and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s unpublished memoir The Billionaire’s Playboy Club recounts her recruitment into Jeffrey Epstein’s world as a 16-year-old working at Mar-a-Lago, where she says Ghislaine Maxwell lured her in with promises of opportunity and travel. The manuscript describes how she became trapped in Epstein’s orbit, allegedly forced into sexual encounters with powerful men, including Prince Andrew, and ferried across his properties in New York, Florida, and the Virgin Islands. Giuffre paints a detailed picture of coercion, psychological manipulation, and the disturbing normalization of exploitation within Epstein’s high-society circle.<br /><br /><br />In this episode, we begin our journey through that memoir.   <br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/7010929-Virgina-Giuffre-Billionaire-s-Playboy-Club/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Virgina Giuffre Billionaire's Playboy Club | DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2097</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Jeffrey Epstein And The Police Report That Exposed Him (Part 14-17) (5/30/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-the-police-report-that-exposed-him-part-14-17-5-30-26--72211334</link><description><![CDATA[The Palm Beach police report reads like the opening chapter of a crime saga everyone wishes had ended sooner. In painstaking detail, investigators laid out how Jeffrey Epstein operated a revolving-door abuse scheme out of his Palm Beach mansion—recruiting underage girls, often as young as 14, under the guise of “massages,” then paying them cash after sexual assaults. The report makes clear this was not a one-off or a misunderstanding; it documents dozens of consistent victim statements, matching descriptions of the house, the routine, the money, and Epstein’s behavior. Detectives noted the sheer volume of victims, the striking similarities in their accounts, and the methodical nature of the abuse—painting a picture of a predator who acted with confidence, repetition, and a belief he would never face consequences.<br /><br />What makes the report so haunting is not just what Epstein did, but how unmistakably obvious it all was. The Palm Beach Police Department concluded there was overwhelming probable cause for felony sex crimes, emphasizing that Epstein’s wealth, influence, and legal maneuvering stood in sharp contrast to the credibility and courage of the girls who came forward. The document reads less like a mystery and more like a warning flare—one that spelled out the scope of the abuse long before the world was forced to confront it. In black and white, the report shows that the truth was there early, detailed, and undeniable—raising the uncomfortable question of why it took so long for justice to even begin catching up.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/6250471/Epstein-Docs.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein-Docs.pdf (documentcloud.org)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72211334</guid><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 08:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72211334/megapalmreport14n15n16n17.mp3" length="52040559" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b454c647-d554-4568-9e65-f8ca0436acee/b454c647-d554-4568-9e65-f8ca0436acee.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b454c647-d554-4568-9e65-f8ca0436acee/b454c647-d554-4568-9e65-f8ca0436acee.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b454c647-d554-4568-9e65-f8ca0436acee/b454c647-d554-4568-9e65-f8ca0436acee.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Palm Beach police report reads like the opening chapter of a crime saga everyone wishes had ended sooner. In painstaking detail, investigators laid out how Jeffrey Epstein operated a revolving-door abuse scheme out of his Palm Beach...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Palm Beach police report reads like the opening chapter of a crime saga everyone wishes had ended sooner. In painstaking detail, investigators laid out how Jeffrey Epstein operated a revolving-door abuse scheme out of his Palm Beach mansion—recruiting underage girls, often as young as 14, under the guise of “massages,” then paying them cash after sexual assaults. The report makes clear this was not a one-off or a misunderstanding; it documents dozens of consistent victim statements, matching descriptions of the house, the routine, the money, and Epstein’s behavior. Detectives noted the sheer volume of victims, the striking similarities in their accounts, and the methodical nature of the abuse—painting a picture of a predator who acted with confidence, repetition, and a belief he would never face consequences.<br /><br />What makes the report so haunting is not just what Epstein did, but how unmistakably obvious it all was. The Palm Beach Police Department concluded there was overwhelming probable cause for felony sex crimes, emphasizing that Epstein’s wealth, influence, and legal maneuvering stood in sharp contrast to the credibility and courage of the girls who came forward. The document reads less like a mystery and more like a warning flare—one that spelled out the scope of the abuse long before the world was forced to confront it. In black and white, the report shows that the truth was there early, detailed, and undeniable—raising the uncomfortable question of why it took so long for justice to even begin catching up.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/6250471/Epstein-Docs.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein-Docs.pdf (documentcloud.org)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3253</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Jeffrey Epstein And The Police Report That Exposed Him (Part 11-13) (5/29/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-the-police-report-that-exposed-him-part-11-13-5-29-26--72211335</link><description><![CDATA[The Palm Beach police report reads like the opening chapter of a crime saga everyone wishes had ended sooner. In painstaking detail, investigators laid out how Jeffrey Epstein operated a revolving-door abuse scheme out of his Palm Beach mansion—recruiting underage girls, often as young as 14, under the guise of “massages,” then paying them cash after sexual assaults. The report makes clear this was not a one-off or a misunderstanding; it documents dozens of consistent victim statements, matching descriptions of the house, the routine, the money, and Epstein’s behavior. Detectives noted the sheer volume of victims, the striking similarities in their accounts, and the methodical nature of the abuse—painting a picture of a predator who acted with confidence, repetition, and a belief he would never face consequences.<br /><br />What makes the report so haunting is not just what Epstein did, but how unmistakably obvious it all was. The Palm Beach Police Department concluded there was overwhelming probable cause for felony sex crimes, emphasizing that Epstein’s wealth, influence, and legal maneuvering stood in sharp contrast to the credibility and courage of the girls who came forward. The document reads less like a mystery and more like a warning flare—one that spelled out the scope of the abuse long before the world was forced to confront it. In black and white, the report shows that the truth was there early, detailed, and undeniable—raising the uncomfortable question of why it took so long for justice to even begin catching up.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/6250471/Epstein-Docs.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein-Docs.pdf (documentcloud.org)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72211335</guid><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 06:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72211335/megapalmbeachreport11n12n13.mp3" length="41092955" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/044aa797-c664-42e5-8e7c-28381a446ca3/044aa797-c664-42e5-8e7c-28381a446ca3.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/044aa797-c664-42e5-8e7c-28381a446ca3/044aa797-c664-42e5-8e7c-28381a446ca3.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/044aa797-c664-42e5-8e7c-28381a446ca3/044aa797-c664-42e5-8e7c-28381a446ca3.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Palm Beach police report reads like the opening chapter of a crime saga everyone wishes had ended sooner. In painstaking detail, investigators laid out how Jeffrey Epstein operated a revolving-door abuse scheme out of his Palm Beach...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Palm Beach police report reads like the opening chapter of a crime saga everyone wishes had ended sooner. In painstaking detail, investigators laid out how Jeffrey Epstein operated a revolving-door abuse scheme out of his Palm Beach mansion—recruiting underage girls, often as young as 14, under the guise of “massages,” then paying them cash after sexual assaults. The report makes clear this was not a one-off or a misunderstanding; it documents dozens of consistent victim statements, matching descriptions of the house, the routine, the money, and Epstein’s behavior. Detectives noted the sheer volume of victims, the striking similarities in their accounts, and the methodical nature of the abuse—painting a picture of a predator who acted with confidence, repetition, and a belief he would never face consequences.<br /><br />What makes the report so haunting is not just what Epstein did, but how unmistakably obvious it all was. The Palm Beach Police Department concluded there was overwhelming probable cause for felony sex crimes, emphasizing that Epstein’s wealth, influence, and legal maneuvering stood in sharp contrast to the credibility and courage of the girls who came forward. The document reads less like a mystery and more like a warning flare—one that spelled out the scope of the abuse long before the world was forced to confront it. In black and white, the report shows that the truth was there early, detailed, and undeniable—raising the uncomfortable question of why it took so long for justice to even begin catching up.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/6250471/Epstein-Docs.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein-Docs.pdf (documentcloud.org)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2569</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Virginia Roberts 2nd Amended Response To Ghislaine Maxwell's 1st Discovery Request (Part 3)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/virginia-roberts-2nd-amended-response-to-ghislaine-maxwell-s-1st-discovery-request-part-3--72211359</link><description><![CDATA[In her Second Amended Response to Maxwell’s discovery demands, Virginia Giuffre pushed back aggressively, refusing to yield to Maxwell’s attempts to broaden discovery into intrusive and irrelevant personal and psychological domains. She objected to Maxwell’s sprawling requests as overly burdensome, unduly invasive, and aimed at discrediting her through unnecessary exposure rather than legitimate legal pursuit. Giuffre instead reinforced her focus on evidence directly tied to the defamation claims and trafficking allegations, contesting any effort by Maxwell to turn the process into a fishing expedition or reputation‑smearing exercise under the guise of legal procedure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24253540-epstein-documents-943-pages" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">epstein-documents-943-pages - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72211359</guid><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 04:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72211359/virg2ndamenddisc3.mp3" length="11109399" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/24812187-6fa0-47ae-b280-6f27c88e1154/24812187-6fa0-47ae-b280-6f27c88e1154.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/24812187-6fa0-47ae-b280-6f27c88e1154/24812187-6fa0-47ae-b280-6f27c88e1154.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/24812187-6fa0-47ae-b280-6f27c88e1154/24812187-6fa0-47ae-b280-6f27c88e1154.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In her Second Amended Response to Maxwell’s discovery demands, Virginia Giuffre pushed back aggressively, refusing to yield to Maxwell’s attempts to broaden discovery into intrusive and irrelevant personal and psychological domains. She objected to...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In her Second Amended Response to Maxwell’s discovery demands, Virginia Giuffre pushed back aggressively, refusing to yield to Maxwell’s attempts to broaden discovery into intrusive and irrelevant personal and psychological domains. She objected to Maxwell’s sprawling requests as overly burdensome, unduly invasive, and aimed at discrediting her through unnecessary exposure rather than legitimate legal pursuit. Giuffre instead reinforced her focus on evidence directly tied to the defamation claims and trafficking allegations, contesting any effort by Maxwell to turn the process into a fishing expedition or reputation‑smearing exercise under the guise of legal procedure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24253540-epstein-documents-943-pages" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">epstein-documents-943-pages - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>695</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Virginia Roberts 2nd Amended Response To Ghislaine Maxwell's 1st Discovery Request (Part 2)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/virginia-roberts-2nd-amended-response-to-ghislaine-maxwell-s-1st-discovery-request-part-2--72211360</link><description><![CDATA[In her Second Amended Response to Maxwell’s discovery demands, Virginia Giuffre pushed back aggressively, refusing to yield to Maxwell’s attempts to broaden discovery into intrusive and irrelevant personal and psychological domains. She objected to Maxwell’s sprawling requests as overly burdensome, unduly invasive, and aimed at discrediting her through unnecessary exposure rather than legitimate legal pursuit. Giuffre instead reinforced her focus on evidence directly tied to the defamation claims and trafficking allegations, contesting any effort by Maxwell to turn the process into a fishing expedition or reputation‑smearing exercise under the guise of legal procedure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24253540-epstein-documents-943-pages" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">epstein-documents-943-pages - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72211360</guid><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 02:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72211360/virg2ndamenddisc2.mp3" length="12014698" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/75149664-b0ae-4f66-8bf2-e08637ed16fa/75149664-b0ae-4f66-8bf2-e08637ed16fa.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/75149664-b0ae-4f66-8bf2-e08637ed16fa/75149664-b0ae-4f66-8bf2-e08637ed16fa.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/75149664-b0ae-4f66-8bf2-e08637ed16fa/75149664-b0ae-4f66-8bf2-e08637ed16fa.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In her Second Amended Response to Maxwell’s discovery demands, Virginia Giuffre pushed back aggressively, refusing to yield to Maxwell’s attempts to broaden discovery into intrusive and irrelevant personal and psychological domains. She objected to...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In her Second Amended Response to Maxwell’s discovery demands, Virginia Giuffre pushed back aggressively, refusing to yield to Maxwell’s attempts to broaden discovery into intrusive and irrelevant personal and psychological domains. She objected to Maxwell’s sprawling requests as overly burdensome, unduly invasive, and aimed at discrediting her through unnecessary exposure rather than legitimate legal pursuit. Giuffre instead reinforced her focus on evidence directly tied to the defamation claims and trafficking allegations, contesting any effort by Maxwell to turn the process into a fishing expedition or reputation‑smearing exercise under the guise of legal procedure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24253540-epstein-documents-943-pages" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">epstein-documents-943-pages - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>751</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Virginia Roberts 2nd Amended Response To Ghislaine Maxwell's 1st Discovery Request (Part 1)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/virginia-roberts-2nd-amended-response-to-ghislaine-maxwell-s-1st-discovery-request-part-1--72211361</link><description><![CDATA[In her Second Amended Response to Maxwell’s discovery demands, Virginia Giuffre pushed back aggressively, refusing to yield to Maxwell’s attempts to broaden discovery into intrusive and irrelevant personal and psychological domains. She objected to Maxwell’s sprawling requests as overly burdensome, unduly invasive, and aimed at discrediting her through unnecessary exposure rather than legitimate legal pursuit. Giuffre instead reinforced her focus on evidence directly tied to the defamation claims and trafficking allegations, contesting any effort by Maxwell to turn the process into a fishing expedition or reputation‑smearing exercise under the guise of legal procedure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24253540-epstein-documents-943-pages" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">epstein-documents-943-pages - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72211361</guid><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 00:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72211361/virg2ndamenddisc1.mp3" length="13487586" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9eac5e09-296d-45ba-9ba9-9020c819fcb8/9eac5e09-296d-45ba-9ba9-9020c819fcb8.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9eac5e09-296d-45ba-9ba9-9020c819fcb8/9eac5e09-296d-45ba-9ba9-9020c819fcb8.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9eac5e09-296d-45ba-9ba9-9020c819fcb8/9eac5e09-296d-45ba-9ba9-9020c819fcb8.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In her Second Amended Response to Maxwell’s discovery demands, Virginia Giuffre pushed back aggressively, refusing to yield to Maxwell’s attempts to broaden discovery into intrusive and irrelevant personal and psychological domains. She objected to...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In her Second Amended Response to Maxwell’s discovery demands, Virginia Giuffre pushed back aggressively, refusing to yield to Maxwell’s attempts to broaden discovery into intrusive and irrelevant personal and psychological domains. She objected to Maxwell’s sprawling requests as overly burdensome, unduly invasive, and aimed at discrediting her through unnecessary exposure rather than legitimate legal pursuit. Giuffre instead reinforced her focus on evidence directly tied to the defamation claims and trafficking allegations, contesting any effort by Maxwell to turn the process into a fishing expedition or reputation‑smearing exercise under the guise of legal procedure.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24253540-epstein-documents-943-pages" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">epstein-documents-943-pages - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>843</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>In Their Own Words: Virginia Giuffre, "Kate" And Sarah Ransome And Their Impact Statements</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/in-their-own-words-virginia-giuffre-kate-and-sarah-ransome-and-their-impact-statements--72211371</link><description><![CDATA[At Ghislaine Maxwell’s sentencing in June 2022, survivors delivered powerful and emotional victim impact statements that left no doubt about the damage she had inflicted. One woman stated plainly, “I never would have met Jeffrey Epstein if not for you,” holding Maxwell personally responsible for the years of abuse that followed. Another described her as a “monster,” recounting how Maxwell’s grooming, manipulation, and betrayal left her permanently scarred. The survivors spoke about shattered lives, ruined trust, and emotional damage that will never fully heal. Maxwell wasn’t a passive bystander—she was the architect of their exploitation, intimately involved in luring and preparing underage girls for sexual abuse under the guise of mentorship and opportunity.<br /><br />Anyone attempting to refurbish Maxwell’s image would do well to stop and truly absorb what she did—and who she did it to. These weren’t abstract victims or peripheral crimes. They were calculated acts committed against vulnerable girls, many of whom were already struggling. Maxwell used charm, privilege, and social power as tools of entrapment, playing the role of the "trusted woman" to disarm and deliver victims to a predator. Her refusal to accept responsibility, her lies under oath, and her ongoing lack of remorse only deepen the stain of her crimes.There can be no public rehabilitation due the wreckage she left behind.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.539612/gov.uscourts.nysd.539612.779.0.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">M6SQmaxSF</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72211371</guid><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 22:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72211371/virginiasarahransomekateimpact_1.mp3" length="12409252" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/641a48c3-1dd4-4850-b1a6-8326292b4ad0/641a48c3-1dd4-4850-b1a6-8326292b4ad0.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/641a48c3-1dd4-4850-b1a6-8326292b4ad0/641a48c3-1dd4-4850-b1a6-8326292b4ad0.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/641a48c3-1dd4-4850-b1a6-8326292b4ad0/641a48c3-1dd4-4850-b1a6-8326292b4ad0.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>At Ghislaine Maxwell’s sentencing in June 2022, survivors delivered powerful and emotional victim impact statements that left no doubt about the damage she had inflicted. One woman stated plainly, “I never would have met Jeffrey Epstein if not for...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[At Ghislaine Maxwell’s sentencing in June 2022, survivors delivered powerful and emotional victim impact statements that left no doubt about the damage she had inflicted. One woman stated plainly, “I never would have met Jeffrey Epstein if not for you,” holding Maxwell personally responsible for the years of abuse that followed. Another described her as a “monster,” recounting how Maxwell’s grooming, manipulation, and betrayal left her permanently scarred. The survivors spoke about shattered lives, ruined trust, and emotional damage that will never fully heal. Maxwell wasn’t a passive bystander—she was the architect of their exploitation, intimately involved in luring and preparing underage girls for sexual abuse under the guise of mentorship and opportunity.<br /><br />Anyone attempting to refurbish Maxwell’s image would do well to stop and truly absorb what she did—and who she did it to. These weren’t abstract victims or peripheral crimes. They were calculated acts committed against vulnerable girls, many of whom were already struggling. Maxwell used charm, privilege, and social power as tools of entrapment, playing the role of the "trusted woman" to disarm and deliver victims to a predator. Her refusal to accept responsibility, her lies under oath, and her ongoing lack of remorse only deepen the stain of her crimes.There can be no public rehabilitation due the wreckage she left behind.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.539612/gov.uscourts.nysd.539612.779.0.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">M6SQmaxSF</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>776</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Captain Of Security Operations At MCC And His OIG Deposition (Part 1) (5/29/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-captain-of-security-operations-at-mcc-and-his-oig-deposition-part-1-5-29-26--72225931</link><description><![CDATA[The document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s death. The captain described the command structure inside the jail, including his role supervising lieutenants and reporting up to associate wardens or the warden, while investigators walked him through staffing, rosters, post assignments, suicide-watch procedures, SHU operations, and the chain of responsibility on August 9–10, 2019. The transcript is important because it does not present Epstein’s death as a clean, orderly institutional event; instead, it shows a jail struggling with bad staffing, confusing handoffs, unfilled posts, questionable paperwork, and a command structure where critical responsibilities appear to have been either missed, misunderstood, or passed around.<br /><br /><br />The most serious value of the interview is in the irregularities it surfaces. The captain reportedly discussed inaccurate rosters or logs, acknowledged questions around skipped SHU rounds, addressed the fact that Epstein had previously been on suicide watch, and said he would not necessarily have known in real time if officers were failing to conduct required checks. Even more troubling, he expressed concern that certain documents may have been deliberately removed from files that should have been reviewed or audited, and investigators also raised an inmate-count issue involving an inmate named Reyes, whose release may not have been properly reflected in the institution’s count — something the captain treated as a protocol violation. Taken together, the transcript adds another layer to the larger Epstein death record: not a single clean explanation, but a bureaucratic mess of missing or questionable documentation, staffing failures, broken supervision, and institutional chaos at precisely the moment when the most high-profile federal inmate in America was supposed to be under careful control.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00111830.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00111830.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72225931</guid><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 20:00:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72225931/dardenoig1.mp3" length="13155309" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a86f3c0c-4bf8-467b-92ff-4aa662da617e/a86f3c0c-4bf8-467b-92ff-4aa662da617e.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a86f3c0c-4bf8-467b-92ff-4aa662da617e/a86f3c0c-4bf8-467b-92ff-4aa662da617e.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a86f3c0c-4bf8-467b-92ff-4aa662da617e/a86f3c0c-4bf8-467b-92ff-4aa662da617e.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s death. The captain described the command...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s death. The captain described the command structure inside the jail, including his role supervising lieutenants and reporting up to associate wardens or the warden, while investigators walked him through staffing, rosters, post assignments, suicide-watch procedures, SHU operations, and the chain of responsibility on August 9–10, 2019. The transcript is important because it does not present Epstein’s death as a clean, orderly institutional event; instead, it shows a jail struggling with bad staffing, confusing handoffs, unfilled posts, questionable paperwork, and a command structure where critical responsibilities appear to have been either missed, misunderstood, or passed around.<br /><br /><br />The most serious value of the interview is in the irregularities it surfaces. The captain reportedly discussed inaccurate rosters or logs, acknowledged questions around skipped SHU rounds, addressed the fact that Epstein had previously been on suicide watch, and said he would not necessarily have known in real time if officers were failing to conduct required checks. Even more troubling, he expressed concern that certain documents may have been deliberately removed from files that should have been reviewed or audited, and investigators also raised an inmate-count issue involving an inmate named Reyes, whose release may not have been properly reflected in the institution’s count — something the captain treated as a protocol violation. Taken together, the transcript adds another layer to the larger Epstein death record: not a single clean explanation, but a bureaucratic mess of missing or questionable documentation, staffing failures, broken supervision, and institutional chaos at precisely the moment when the most high-profile federal inmate in America was supposed to be under careful control.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00111830.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00111830.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>823</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Alisa Valdes-Rodriguez Links Alleged Attack to Her Epstein Ranch Investigation (5/29/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/alisa-valdes-rodriguez-links-alleged-attack-to-her-epstein-ranch-investigation-5-29-26--72225882</link><description><![CDATA[Alisa Valdes-Rodriguez, a former newspaper reporter and bestselling novelist who has spent recent years investigating Jeffrey Epstein’s Zorro Ranch in New Mexico, says she has left her home and is preparing to leave the United States after what she claims were “directed energy weapon” attacks connected to her Epstein reporting. She has alleged that her work on Zorro Ranch, local cover-up claims, and possible intelligence-linked trafficking networks made her a target, and she described suffering symptoms she compared to “Havana syndrome,” including neurological pressure-type effects. She claimed the attacks came in multiple episodes, possibly from equipment on or near her roof or from a semi-truck parked near her home. There is no public evidence confirming that she was attacked with directed energy weapons or that her claims about buried victims, military contractors, or intelligence-linked retaliation have been substantiated.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://nypost.com/2026/05/26/media/reporter-who-investigated-jeffrey-epstein-is-fleeing-the-us-after-alleged-attack/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Reporter who investigated Jeffrey Epstein is 'fleeing' the US after alleged attack</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72225882</guid><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 18:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72225882/andrewfergiebonnieclyde.mp3" length="16352279" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/009f51cc-8583-46a6-8377-6fb560050d5b/009f51cc-8583-46a6-8377-6fb560050d5b.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/009f51cc-8583-46a6-8377-6fb560050d5b/009f51cc-8583-46a6-8377-6fb560050d5b.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/009f51cc-8583-46a6-8377-6fb560050d5b/009f51cc-8583-46a6-8377-6fb560050d5b.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Alisa Valdes-Rodriguez, a former newspaper reporter and bestselling novelist who has spent recent years investigating Jeffrey Epstein’s Zorro Ranch in New Mexico, says she has left her home and is preparing to leave the United States after what she...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Alisa Valdes-Rodriguez, a former newspaper reporter and bestselling novelist who has spent recent years investigating Jeffrey Epstein’s Zorro Ranch in New Mexico, says she has left her home and is preparing to leave the United States after what she claims were “directed energy weapon” attacks connected to her Epstein reporting. She has alleged that her work on Zorro Ranch, local cover-up claims, and possible intelligence-linked trafficking networks made her a target, and she described suffering symptoms she compared to “Havana syndrome,” including neurological pressure-type effects. She claimed the attacks came in multiple episodes, possibly from equipment on or near her roof or from a semi-truck parked near her home. There is no public evidence confirming that she was attacked with directed energy weapons or that her claims about buried victims, military contractors, or intelligence-linked retaliation have been substantiated.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://nypost.com/2026/05/26/media/reporter-who-investigated-jeffrey-epstein-is-fleeing-the-us-after-alleged-attack/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Reporter who investigated Jeffrey Epstein is 'fleeing' the US after alleged attack</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1022</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Alisa Valdes-Rodriguez Links Alleged Attack to Her Epstein Ranch Investigation (5/29/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/alisa-valdes-rodriguez-links-alleged-attack-to-her-epstein-ranch-investigation-5-29-26--72225899</link><description><![CDATA[Alisa Valdes-Rodriguez, a former newspaper reporter and bestselling novelist who has spent recent years investigating Jeffrey Epstein’s Zorro Ranch in New Mexico, says she has left her home and is preparing to leave the United States after what she claims were “directed energy weapon” attacks connected to her Epstein reporting. She has alleged that her work on Zorro Ranch, local cover-up claims, and possible intelligence-linked trafficking networks made her a target, and she described suffering symptoms she compared to “Havana syndrome,” including neurological pressure-type effects. She claimed the attacks came in multiple episodes, possibly from equipment on or near her roof or from a semi-truck parked near her home. There is no public evidence confirming that she was attacked with directed energy weapons or that her claims about buried victims, military contractors, or intelligence-linked retaliation have been substantiated.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://nypost.com/2026/05/26/media/reporter-who-investigated-jeffrey-epstein-is-fleeing-the-us-after-alleged-attack/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Reporter who investigated Jeffrey Epstein is 'fleeing' the US after alleged attack</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72225899</guid><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 16:00:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72225899/highenergyweaponepsteinreporter.mp3" length="10038169" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/db73534e-e3e8-4716-ac34-c3e658421705/db73534e-e3e8-4716-ac34-c3e658421705.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/db73534e-e3e8-4716-ac34-c3e658421705/db73534e-e3e8-4716-ac34-c3e658421705.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/db73534e-e3e8-4716-ac34-c3e658421705/db73534e-e3e8-4716-ac34-c3e658421705.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Alisa Valdes-Rodriguez, a former newspaper reporter and bestselling novelist who has spent recent years investigating Jeffrey Epstein’s Zorro Ranch in New Mexico, says she has left her home and is preparing to leave the United States after what she...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Alisa Valdes-Rodriguez, a former newspaper reporter and bestselling novelist who has spent recent years investigating Jeffrey Epstein’s Zorro Ranch in New Mexico, says she has left her home and is preparing to leave the United States after what she claims were “directed energy weapon” attacks connected to her Epstein reporting. She has alleged that her work on Zorro Ranch, local cover-up claims, and possible intelligence-linked trafficking networks made her a target, and she described suffering symptoms she compared to “Havana syndrome,” including neurological pressure-type effects. She claimed the attacks came in multiple episodes, possibly from equipment on or near her roof or from a semi-truck parked near her home. There is no public evidence confirming that she was attacked with directed energy weapons or that her claims about buried victims, military contractors, or intelligence-linked retaliation have been substantiated.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://nypost.com/2026/05/26/media/reporter-who-investigated-jeffrey-epstein-is-fleeing-the-us-after-alleged-attack/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Reporter who investigated Jeffrey Epstein is 'fleeing' the US after alleged attack</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>628</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>From Donor Lodge to Demolition Site: Interlochen’s Epstein Problem (5/29/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/from-donor-lodge-to-demolition-site-interlochen-s-epstein-problem-5-29-26--72225900</link><description><![CDATA[Interlochen Center for the Arts is moving to demolish Green Lake Lodge, a building originally funded by Jeffrey Epstein and once named for him before the school stripped his name from campus after learning of his 2009 criminal conviction. Epstein had attended Interlochen’s summer camp in 1967 and later donated to the institution from 1990 to 2003. The lodge, built along Green Lake, was used to house donors and, at times, Epstein himself. Interlochen says it previously investigated his activities on campus after his first conviction and again after his 2019 arrest, claiming it found no evidence that Epstein committed crimes at the school. Still, the building has become impossible for the institution to separate from Epstein’s legacy, and Interlochen’s board says demolishing it is now the appropriate step.<br /><br />The renewed scrutiny comes after recently released Justice Department files and prior reporting showed Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell met alone with at least one student at the lodge, an encounter the woman later described as the beginning of grooming behavior. Interlochen says it does not allow unsupervised donor-student visits, but that claim only raises more questions about how Epstein and Maxwell ended up alone with a student in the first place. Michigan lawmakers have signaled plans to investigate Epstein’s activities at Interlochen, while the school says it has cooperated with investigators and will respond to oversight bodies as needed. The demolition may remove the physical structure, but it does not erase the larger issue: Epstein was embedded deeply enough in elite institutions that even a children’s arts camp in northern Michigan became part of the long, ugly paper trail.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.abc12.com/news/interlochen-to-demolish-lodge-tied-to-jeffrey-epstein/article_5871d225-10f8-4989-a0e2-75c2fbf7751f.html#google_vignette" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Interlochen to demolish lodge tied to Jeffrey Epstein | News | abc12.com</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72225900</guid><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 14:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72225900/interlochenclosing.mp3" length="10585278" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/eaf60985-61c9-477d-87a0-89a70da159d1/eaf60985-61c9-477d-87a0-89a70da159d1.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/eaf60985-61c9-477d-87a0-89a70da159d1/eaf60985-61c9-477d-87a0-89a70da159d1.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/eaf60985-61c9-477d-87a0-89a70da159d1/eaf60985-61c9-477d-87a0-89a70da159d1.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Interlochen Center for the Arts is moving to demolish Green Lake Lodge, a building originally funded by Jeffrey Epstein and once named for him before the school stripped his name from campus after learning of his 2009 criminal conviction. Epstein had...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Interlochen Center for the Arts is moving to demolish Green Lake Lodge, a building originally funded by Jeffrey Epstein and once named for him before the school stripped his name from campus after learning of his 2009 criminal conviction. Epstein had attended Interlochen’s summer camp in 1967 and later donated to the institution from 1990 to 2003. The lodge, built along Green Lake, was used to house donors and, at times, Epstein himself. Interlochen says it previously investigated his activities on campus after his first conviction and again after his 2019 arrest, claiming it found no evidence that Epstein committed crimes at the school. Still, the building has become impossible for the institution to separate from Epstein’s legacy, and Interlochen’s board says demolishing it is now the appropriate step.<br /><br />The renewed scrutiny comes after recently released Justice Department files and prior reporting showed Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell met alone with at least one student at the lodge, an encounter the woman later described as the beginning of grooming behavior. Interlochen says it does not allow unsupervised donor-student visits, but that claim only raises more questions about how Epstein and Maxwell ended up alone with a student in the first place. Michigan lawmakers have signaled plans to investigate Epstein’s activities at Interlochen, while the school says it has cooperated with investigators and will respond to oversight bodies as needed. The demolition may remove the physical structure, but it does not erase the larger issue: Epstein was embedded deeply enough in elite institutions that even a children’s arts camp in northern Michigan became part of the long, ugly paper trail.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.abc12.com/news/interlochen-to-demolish-lodge-tied-to-jeffrey-epstein/article_5871d225-10f8-4989-a0e2-75c2fbf7751f.html#google_vignette" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Interlochen to demolish lodge tied to Jeffrey Epstein | News | abc12.com</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>662</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Trump Refiles the $10 Billion Epstein Lawsuit Against the Wall Street Journal (5/29/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/trump-refiles-the-10-billion-epstein-lawsuit-against-the-wall-street-journal-5-29-26--72225628</link><description><![CDATA[<br />Donald Trump has refiled a $10 billion defamation lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal over its reporting on his alleged ties to Jeffrey Epstein, specifically an article describing a birthday card to Epstein as bearing Trump’s signature. The new filing came after a federal judge threw out Trump’s earlier complaint in April, ruling that it failed to meet the “actual malice” standard required in defamation cases involving public figures. Trump’s lawyers argue that the paper either recklessly disregarded the truth or deliberately avoided discovering it, while Trump maintains the card is fake, even after lawmakers investigating Epstein released it publicly.<br /><br />The lawsuit names Rupert Murdoch, Dow Jones, News Corp, CEO Robert Thomson, and two Wall Street Journal reporters as defendants, claiming the reporting caused Trump major reputational and financial harm. Dow Jones has defended the reporting and said it will fight the case. The broader significance is that the lawsuit sits inside a larger pattern of Trump using defamation actions against media organizations while the Epstein issue continues to haunt his political orbit. It also keeps the Epstein connection alive in court rather than burying it, because every filing, defense response, discovery fight, and judicial ruling has the potential to drag the underlying questions about Trump, Epstein, the card, and the paper trail back into public view.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/may/28/trump-refiles-10bn-lawsuit-against-wsj-over-report-on-alleged-epstein-ties" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Trump refiles $10bn lawsuit against WSJ over report on alleged Epstein ties | Donald Trump | The Guardian</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72225628</guid><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 13:22:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72225628/trumpsueswsjagain.mp3" length="10354564" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/787b0afd-2455-4244-8960-22de5098cf97/787b0afd-2455-4244-8960-22de5098cf97.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/787b0afd-2455-4244-8960-22de5098cf97/787b0afd-2455-4244-8960-22de5098cf97.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/787b0afd-2455-4244-8960-22de5098cf97/787b0afd-2455-4244-8960-22de5098cf97.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Donald Trump has refiled a $10 billion defamation lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal over its reporting on his alleged ties to Jeffrey Epstein, specifically an article describing a birthday card to Epstein as bearing Trump’s signature. The new...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br />Donald Trump has refiled a $10 billion defamation lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal over its reporting on his alleged ties to Jeffrey Epstein, specifically an article describing a birthday card to Epstein as bearing Trump’s signature. The new filing came after a federal judge threw out Trump’s earlier complaint in April, ruling that it failed to meet the “actual malice” standard required in defamation cases involving public figures. Trump’s lawyers argue that the paper either recklessly disregarded the truth or deliberately avoided discovering it, while Trump maintains the card is fake, even after lawmakers investigating Epstein released it publicly.<br /><br />The lawsuit names Rupert Murdoch, Dow Jones, News Corp, CEO Robert Thomson, and two Wall Street Journal reporters as defendants, claiming the reporting caused Trump major reputational and financial harm. Dow Jones has defended the reporting and said it will fight the case. The broader significance is that the lawsuit sits inside a larger pattern of Trump using defamation actions against media organizations while the Epstein issue continues to haunt his political orbit. It also keeps the Epstein connection alive in court rather than burying it, because every filing, defense response, discovery fight, and judicial ruling has the potential to drag the underlying questions about Trump, Epstein, the card, and the paper trail back into public view.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/may/28/trump-refiles-10bn-lawsuit-against-wsj-over-report-on-alleged-epstein-ties" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Trump refiles $10bn lawsuit against WSJ over report on alleged Epstein ties | Donald Trump | The Guardian</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>648</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Jeffrey Epstein And The Police Report That Exposed Him (Part 8-10) (5/24/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-the-police-report-that-exposed-him-part-8-10-5-24-26--72211333</link><description><![CDATA[The Palm Beach police report reads like the opening chapter of a crime saga everyone wishes had ended sooner. In painstaking detail, investigators laid out how Jeffrey Epstein operated a revolving-door abuse scheme out of his Palm Beach mansion—recruiting underage girls, often as young as 14, under the guise of “massages,” then paying them cash after sexual assaults. The report makes clear this was not a one-off or a misunderstanding; it documents dozens of consistent victim statements, matching descriptions of the house, the routine, the money, and Epstein’s behavior. Detectives noted the sheer volume of victims, the striking similarities in their accounts, and the methodical nature of the abuse—painting a picture of a predator who acted with confidence, repetition, and a belief he would never face consequences.<br /><br />What makes the report so haunting is not just what Epstein did, but how unmistakably obvious it all was. The Palm Beach Police Department concluded there was overwhelming probable cause for felony sex crimes, emphasizing that Epstein’s wealth, influence, and legal maneuvering stood in sharp contrast to the credibility and courage of the girls who came forward. The document reads less like a mystery and more like a warning flare—one that spelled out the scope of the abuse long before the world was forced to confront it. In black and white, the report shows that the truth was there early, detailed, and undeniable—raising the uncomfortable question of why it took so long for justice to even begin catching up.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/6250471/Epstein-Docs.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein-Docs.pdf (documentcloud.org)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72211333</guid><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72211333/megapalmbeachreport8n9n10.mp3" length="38730231" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8f496cd7-1211-4efd-baba-435802af6504/8f496cd7-1211-4efd-baba-435802af6504.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8f496cd7-1211-4efd-baba-435802af6504/8f496cd7-1211-4efd-baba-435802af6504.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8f496cd7-1211-4efd-baba-435802af6504/8f496cd7-1211-4efd-baba-435802af6504.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Palm Beach police report reads like the opening chapter of a crime saga everyone wishes had ended sooner. In painstaking detail, investigators laid out how Jeffrey Epstein operated a revolving-door abuse scheme out of his Palm Beach...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Palm Beach police report reads like the opening chapter of a crime saga everyone wishes had ended sooner. In painstaking detail, investigators laid out how Jeffrey Epstein operated a revolving-door abuse scheme out of his Palm Beach mansion—recruiting underage girls, often as young as 14, under the guise of “massages,” then paying them cash after sexual assaults. The report makes clear this was not a one-off or a misunderstanding; it documents dozens of consistent victim statements, matching descriptions of the house, the routine, the money, and Epstein’s behavior. Detectives noted the sheer volume of victims, the striking similarities in their accounts, and the methodical nature of the abuse—painting a picture of a predator who acted with confidence, repetition, and a belief he would never face consequences.<br /><br />What makes the report so haunting is not just what Epstein did, but how unmistakably obvious it all was. The Palm Beach Police Department concluded there was overwhelming probable cause for felony sex crimes, emphasizing that Epstein’s wealth, influence, and legal maneuvering stood in sharp contrast to the credibility and courage of the girls who came forward. The document reads less like a mystery and more like a warning flare—one that spelled out the scope of the abuse long before the world was forced to confront it. In black and white, the report shows that the truth was there early, detailed, and undeniable—raising the uncomfortable question of why it took so long for justice to even begin catching up.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/6250471/Epstein-Docs.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein-Docs.pdf (documentcloud.org)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2421</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Jeffrey Epstein And The Police Report That Exposed Him (Part 5-7) (5/24/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-the-police-report-that-exposed-him-part-5-7-5-24-26--72211332</link><description><![CDATA[The Palm Beach police report reads like the opening chapter of a crime saga everyone wishes had ended sooner. In painstaking detail, investigators laid out how Jeffrey Epstein operated a revolving-door abuse scheme out of his Palm Beach mansion—recruiting underage girls, often as young as 14, under the guise of “massages,” then paying them cash after sexual assaults. The report makes clear this was not a one-off or a misunderstanding; it documents dozens of consistent victim statements, matching descriptions of the house, the routine, the money, and Epstein’s behavior. Detectives noted the sheer volume of victims, the striking similarities in their accounts, and the methodical nature of the abuse—painting a picture of a predator who acted with confidence, repetition, and a belief he would never face consequences.<br /><br />What makes the report so haunting is not just what Epstein did, but how unmistakably obvious it all was. The Palm Beach Police Department concluded there was overwhelming probable cause for felony sex crimes, emphasizing that Epstein’s wealth, influence, and legal maneuvering stood in sharp contrast to the credibility and courage of the girls who came forward. The document reads less like a mystery and more like a warning flare—one that spelled out the scope of the abuse long before the world was forced to confront it. In black and white, the report shows that the truth was there early, detailed, and undeniable—raising the uncomfortable question of why it took so long for justice to even begin catching up.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/6250471/Epstein-Docs.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein-Docs.pdf (documentcloud.org)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72211332</guid><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72211332/megapalmbeachreport5n6n7.mp3" length="41553128" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/797ba676-15cc-4852-93b8-dbb832dd5003/797ba676-15cc-4852-93b8-dbb832dd5003.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/797ba676-15cc-4852-93b8-dbb832dd5003/797ba676-15cc-4852-93b8-dbb832dd5003.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/797ba676-15cc-4852-93b8-dbb832dd5003/797ba676-15cc-4852-93b8-dbb832dd5003.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Palm Beach police report reads like the opening chapter of a crime saga everyone wishes had ended sooner. In painstaking detail, investigators laid out how Jeffrey Epstein operated a revolving-door abuse scheme out of his Palm Beach...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Palm Beach police report reads like the opening chapter of a crime saga everyone wishes had ended sooner. In painstaking detail, investigators laid out how Jeffrey Epstein operated a revolving-door abuse scheme out of his Palm Beach mansion—recruiting underage girls, often as young as 14, under the guise of “massages,” then paying them cash after sexual assaults. The report makes clear this was not a one-off or a misunderstanding; it documents dozens of consistent victim statements, matching descriptions of the house, the routine, the money, and Epstein’s behavior. Detectives noted the sheer volume of victims, the striking similarities in their accounts, and the methodical nature of the abuse—painting a picture of a predator who acted with confidence, repetition, and a belief he would never face consequences.<br /><br />What makes the report so haunting is not just what Epstein did, but how unmistakably obvious it all was. The Palm Beach Police Department concluded there was overwhelming probable cause for felony sex crimes, emphasizing that Epstein’s wealth, influence, and legal maneuvering stood in sharp contrast to the credibility and courage of the girls who came forward. The document reads less like a mystery and more like a warning flare—one that spelled out the scope of the abuse long before the world was forced to confront it. In black and white, the report shows that the truth was there early, detailed, and undeniable—raising the uncomfortable question of why it took so long for justice to even begin catching up.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/6250471/Epstein-Docs.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein-Docs.pdf (documentcloud.org)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2598</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Jeffrey Epstein And The Police Report That Exposed Him (Part 1-4) (5/24/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-the-police-report-that-exposed-him-part-1-4-5-24-26--72211331</link><description><![CDATA[The Palm Beach police report reads like the opening chapter of a crime saga everyone wishes had ended sooner. In painstaking detail, investigators laid out how Jeffrey Epstein operated a revolving-door abuse scheme out of his Palm Beach mansion—recruiting underage girls, often as young as 14, under the guise of “massages,” then paying them cash after sexual assaults. The report makes clear this was not a one-off or a misunderstanding; it documents dozens of consistent victim statements, matching descriptions of the house, the routine, the money, and Epstein’s behavior. Detectives noted the sheer volume of victims, the striking similarities in their accounts, and the methodical nature of the abuse—painting a picture of a predator who acted with confidence, repetition, and a belief he would never face consequences.<br /><br />What makes the report so haunting is not just what Epstein did, but how unmistakably obvious it all was. The Palm Beach Police Department concluded there was overwhelming probable cause for felony sex crimes, emphasizing that Epstein’s wealth, influence, and legal maneuvering stood in sharp contrast to the credibility and courage of the girls who came forward. The document reads less like a mystery and more like a warning flare—one that spelled out the scope of the abuse long before the world was forced to confront it. In black and white, the report shows that the truth was there early, detailed, and undeniable—raising the uncomfortable question of why it took so long for justice to even begin catching up.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/6250471/Epstein-Docs.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein-Docs.pdf (documentcloud.org)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72211331</guid><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72211331/megapalmbeachreport1n2n3n4.mp3" length="52975116" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7428ebe3-69fe-436e-b50b-b6765e842a94/7428ebe3-69fe-436e-b50b-b6765e842a94.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7428ebe3-69fe-436e-b50b-b6765e842a94/7428ebe3-69fe-436e-b50b-b6765e842a94.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7428ebe3-69fe-436e-b50b-b6765e842a94/7428ebe3-69fe-436e-b50b-b6765e842a94.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Palm Beach police report reads like the opening chapter of a crime saga everyone wishes had ended sooner. In painstaking detail, investigators laid out how Jeffrey Epstein operated a revolving-door abuse scheme out of his Palm Beach...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Palm Beach police report reads like the opening chapter of a crime saga everyone wishes had ended sooner. In painstaking detail, investigators laid out how Jeffrey Epstein operated a revolving-door abuse scheme out of his Palm Beach mansion—recruiting underage girls, often as young as 14, under the guise of “massages,” then paying them cash after sexual assaults. The report makes clear this was not a one-off or a misunderstanding; it documents dozens of consistent victim statements, matching descriptions of the house, the routine, the money, and Epstein’s behavior. Detectives noted the sheer volume of victims, the striking similarities in their accounts, and the methodical nature of the abuse—painting a picture of a predator who acted with confidence, repetition, and a belief he would never face consequences.<br /><br />What makes the report so haunting is not just what Epstein did, but how unmistakably obvious it all was. The Palm Beach Police Department concluded there was overwhelming probable cause for felony sex crimes, emphasizing that Epstein’s wealth, influence, and legal maneuvering stood in sharp contrast to the credibility and courage of the girls who came forward. The document reads less like a mystery and more like a warning flare—one that spelled out the scope of the abuse long before the world was forced to confront it. In black and white, the report shows that the truth was there early, detailed, and undeniable—raising the uncomfortable question of why it took so long for justice to even begin catching up.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/6250471/Epstein-Docs.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein-Docs.pdf (documentcloud.org)</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3311</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>In Their Own Words: Elizabeth Stein,  Maria Farmer, Theresa Helm And Their Impact Statements</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/in-their-own-words-elizabeth-stein-maria-farmer-theresa-helm-and-their-impact-statements--72211370</link><description><![CDATA[At Ghislaine Maxwell’s sentencing in June 2022, survivors delivered powerful and emotional victim impact statements that left no doubt about the damage she had inflicted. One woman stated plainly, “I never would have met Jeffrey Epstein if not for you,” holding Maxwell personally responsible for the years of abuse that followed. Another described her as a “monster,” recounting how Maxwell’s grooming, manipulation, and betrayal left her permanently scarred. The survivors spoke about shattered lives, ruined trust, and emotional damage that will never fully heal. Maxwell wasn’t a passive bystander—she was the architect of their exploitation, intimately involved in luring and preparing underage girls for sexual abuse under the guise of mentorship and opportunity.<br /><br />Anyone attempting to refurbish Maxwell’s image would do well to stop and truly absorb what she did—and who she did it to. These weren’t abstract victims or peripheral crimes. They were calculated acts committed against vulnerable girls, many of whom were already struggling. Maxwell used charm, privilege, and social power as tools of entrapment, playing the role of the "trusted woman" to disarm and deliver victims to a predator. Her refusal to accept responsibility, her lies under oath, and her ongoing lack of remorse only deepen the stain of her crimes.There can be no public rehabilitation due the wreckage she left behind.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.539612/gov.uscourts.nysd.539612.779.0.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">M6SQmaxSF</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72211370</guid><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72211370/steinmariahelmimpact_2.mp3" length="11695795" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/747fc2ba-2855-4656-adc3-7874b7d97aef/747fc2ba-2855-4656-adc3-7874b7d97aef.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/747fc2ba-2855-4656-adc3-7874b7d97aef/747fc2ba-2855-4656-adc3-7874b7d97aef.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/747fc2ba-2855-4656-adc3-7874b7d97aef/747fc2ba-2855-4656-adc3-7874b7d97aef.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>At Ghislaine Maxwell’s sentencing in June 2022, survivors delivered powerful and emotional victim impact statements that left no doubt about the damage she had inflicted. One woman stated plainly, “I never would have met Jeffrey Epstein if not for...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[At Ghislaine Maxwell’s sentencing in June 2022, survivors delivered powerful and emotional victim impact statements that left no doubt about the damage she had inflicted. One woman stated plainly, “I never would have met Jeffrey Epstein if not for you,” holding Maxwell personally responsible for the years of abuse that followed. Another described her as a “monster,” recounting how Maxwell’s grooming, manipulation, and betrayal left her permanently scarred. The survivors spoke about shattered lives, ruined trust, and emotional damage that will never fully heal. Maxwell wasn’t a passive bystander—she was the architect of their exploitation, intimately involved in luring and preparing underage girls for sexual abuse under the guise of mentorship and opportunity.<br /><br />Anyone attempting to refurbish Maxwell’s image would do well to stop and truly absorb what she did—and who she did it to. These weren’t abstract victims or peripheral crimes. They were calculated acts committed against vulnerable girls, many of whom were already struggling. Maxwell used charm, privilege, and social power as tools of entrapment, playing the role of the "trusted woman" to disarm and deliver victims to a predator. Her refusal to accept responsibility, her lies under oath, and her ongoing lack of remorse only deepen the stain of her crimes.There can be no public rehabilitation due the wreckage she left behind.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.539612/gov.uscourts.nysd.539612.779.0.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">M6SQmaxSF</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>731</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Jeffrey Epstein Wasn't The First Monster That Got Close To The Heart Of The Monarchy</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/jeffrey-epstein-wasn-t-the-first-monster-that-got-close-to-the-heart-of-the-monarchy--72211367</link><description><![CDATA[Jimmy Savile fooled the United Kingdom by turning himself into a national institution before the country ever understood what he really was. He built a public image out of charity marathons, hospital visits, children’s television, BBC fame, eccentric branding, and proximity to respectable institutions. That image became his shield. He was not merely hiding in the shadows; he was hiding in plain sight, protected by celebrity, deference, institutional cowardice, and the British habit of confusing access to power with moral legitimacy. Hospitals opened doors to him. Broadcasters promoted him. Politicians posed with him. The public saw the tracksuits, the cigar, the jewelry, the catchphrases, and the charity work, while behind that manufactured persona was a predator who exploited children, patients, vulnerable women, and institutional blind spots for decades. The horror of Savile is not just that he deceived people; it is that so many systems had chances to question him and chose comfort, reputation, and silence instead.<br /><br />Savile’s closeness to the royal orbit made the deception even more grotesque. He developed a relationship with then-Prince Charles through charity work, visited royal residences, corresponded with him, and was reportedly consulted on media strategy and public relations matters, including how the royal household should respond to crises. That does not mean the royals knew what Savile was doing, but it does show how easily a predator could launder himself through elite proximity. That is where the echo with Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew becomes impossible to ignore. In both cases, a sexually abusive man gained credibility by orbiting powerful people, presenting himself as useful, charitable, connected, or socially valuable. Savile used hospitals, the BBC, charity, and royal access. Epstein used money, private planes, philanthropy, academia, finance, and aristocratic friendships. Andrew’s relationship with Epstein later exposed the same rotten mechanism: elites mistaking proximity, usefulness, and social familiarity for innocence, while victims were left to fight against institutions that had already decided the powerful deserved the benefit of the doubt.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72211367</guid><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72211367/savilegaslituk.mp3" length="14424233" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/aaeb0a24-e7c4-4aef-bf68-b75e60ba7dc8/aaeb0a24-e7c4-4aef-bf68-b75e60ba7dc8.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/aaeb0a24-e7c4-4aef-bf68-b75e60ba7dc8/aaeb0a24-e7c4-4aef-bf68-b75e60ba7dc8.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/aaeb0a24-e7c4-4aef-bf68-b75e60ba7dc8/aaeb0a24-e7c4-4aef-bf68-b75e60ba7dc8.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jimmy Savile fooled the United Kingdom by turning himself into a national institution before the country ever understood what he really was. He built a public image out of charity marathons, hospital visits, children’s television, BBC fame, eccentric...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jimmy Savile fooled the United Kingdom by turning himself into a national institution before the country ever understood what he really was. He built a public image out of charity marathons, hospital visits, children’s television, BBC fame, eccentric branding, and proximity to respectable institutions. That image became his shield. He was not merely hiding in the shadows; he was hiding in plain sight, protected by celebrity, deference, institutional cowardice, and the British habit of confusing access to power with moral legitimacy. Hospitals opened doors to him. Broadcasters promoted him. Politicians posed with him. The public saw the tracksuits, the cigar, the jewelry, the catchphrases, and the charity work, while behind that manufactured persona was a predator who exploited children, patients, vulnerable women, and institutional blind spots for decades. The horror of Savile is not just that he deceived people; it is that so many systems had chances to question him and chose comfort, reputation, and silence instead.<br /><br />Savile’s closeness to the royal orbit made the deception even more grotesque. He developed a relationship with then-Prince Charles through charity work, visited royal residences, corresponded with him, and was reportedly consulted on media strategy and public relations matters, including how the royal household should respond to crises. That does not mean the royals knew what Savile was doing, but it does show how easily a predator could launder himself through elite proximity. That is where the echo with Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew becomes impossible to ignore. In both cases, a sexually abusive man gained credibility by orbiting powerful people, presenting himself as useful, charitable, connected, or socially valuable. Savile used hospitals, the BBC, charity, and royal access. Epstein used money, private planes, philanthropy, academia, finance, and aristocratic friendships. Andrew’s relationship with Epstein later exposed the same rotten mechanism: elites mistaking proximity, usefulness, and social familiarity for innocence, while victims were left to fight against institutions that had already decided the powerful deserved the benefit of the doubt.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>902</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Adriana Ross FBI 302 Raises Questions on Epstein’s Role in Trump–Melania Introduction (Part 6)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/adriana-ross-fbi-302-raises-questions-on-epstein-s-role-in-trump-melania-introduction-part-6--72186846</link><description><![CDATA[Newly surfaced FBI material indicates that Jeffrey Epstein may have played a role in introducing Melania Trump to Donald Trump, directly contradicting prior public denials that any such connection existed. The information suggests that Epstein’s social network extended into the circumstances surrounding how the two met, raising questions about earlier efforts to distance that relationship from him. This contradiction has intensified scrutiny, particularly as officials and public figures continue to push narratives that minimize or deny Epstein’s proximity to influential circles.<br /><br /><br />The information traces back to an FBI FD-302 interview with Adriana Ross, one of Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime associates, in which she described elements of Epstein’s social orbit and interactions with high-profile figures. In that interview summary, Ross allegedly indicated that Epstein had a role in facilitating the introduction between Melania and Donald Trump, placing him closer to that moment than publicly acknowledged. Because FD-302s are internal FBI records that capture agents’ recollections of witness statements rather than verbatim transcripts, the account reflects what Ross told investigators at the time, adding a layer of evidentiary significance while still leaving room for interpretation and dispute.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00090773.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00090773.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72186846</guid><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72186846/adrianaross302part6.mp3" length="10803453" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cd0b15c8-74c0-41d1-8c50-eb9888143a40/cd0b15c8-74c0-41d1-8c50-eb9888143a40.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cd0b15c8-74c0-41d1-8c50-eb9888143a40/cd0b15c8-74c0-41d1-8c50-eb9888143a40.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cd0b15c8-74c0-41d1-8c50-eb9888143a40/cd0b15c8-74c0-41d1-8c50-eb9888143a40.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Newly surfaced FBI material indicates that Jeffrey Epstein may have played a role in introducing Melania Trump to Donald Trump, directly contradicting prior public denials that any such connection existed. The information suggests that Epstein’s...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Newly surfaced FBI material indicates that Jeffrey Epstein may have played a role in introducing Melania Trump to Donald Trump, directly contradicting prior public denials that any such connection existed. The information suggests that Epstein’s social network extended into the circumstances surrounding how the two met, raising questions about earlier efforts to distance that relationship from him. This contradiction has intensified scrutiny, particularly as officials and public figures continue to push narratives that minimize or deny Epstein’s proximity to influential circles.<br /><br /><br />The information traces back to an FBI FD-302 interview with Adriana Ross, one of Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime associates, in which she described elements of Epstein’s social orbit and interactions with high-profile figures. In that interview summary, Ross allegedly indicated that Epstein had a role in facilitating the introduction between Melania and Donald Trump, placing him closer to that moment than publicly acknowledged. Because FD-302s are internal FBI records that capture agents’ recollections of witness statements rather than verbatim transcripts, the account reflects what Ross told investigators at the time, adding a layer of evidentiary significance while still leaving room for interpretation and dispute.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00090773.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00090773.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>676</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Adriana Ross FBI 302 Raises Questions on Epstein’s Role in Trump–Melania Introduction (Part 5)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/adriana-ross-fbi-302-raises-questions-on-epstein-s-role-in-trump-melania-introduction-part-5--72186850</link><description><![CDATA[Newly surfaced FBI material indicates that Jeffrey Epstein may have played a role in introducing Melania Trump to Donald Trump, directly contradicting prior public denials that any such connection existed. The information suggests that Epstein’s social network extended into the circumstances surrounding how the two met, raising questions about earlier efforts to distance that relationship from him. This contradiction has intensified scrutiny, particularly as officials and public figures continue to push narratives that minimize or deny Epstein’s proximity to influential circles.<br /><br /><br />The information traces back to an FBI FD-302 interview with Adriana Ross, one of Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime associates, in which she described elements of Epstein’s social orbit and interactions with high-profile figures. In that interview summary, Ross allegedly indicated that Epstein had a role in facilitating the introduction between Melania and Donald Trump, placing him closer to that moment than publicly acknowledged. Because FD-302s are internal FBI records that capture agents’ recollections of witness statements rather than verbatim transcripts, the account reflects what Ross told investigators at the time, adding a layer of evidentiary significance while still leaving room for interpretation and dispute.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00090773.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00090773.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72186850</guid><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72186850/adrianaross302part5.mp3" length="18197986" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b2a17b48-dbdd-4e80-ae3d-07c2c509f16b/b2a17b48-dbdd-4e80-ae3d-07c2c509f16b.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b2a17b48-dbdd-4e80-ae3d-07c2c509f16b/b2a17b48-dbdd-4e80-ae3d-07c2c509f16b.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b2a17b48-dbdd-4e80-ae3d-07c2c509f16b/b2a17b48-dbdd-4e80-ae3d-07c2c509f16b.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Newly surfaced FBI material indicates that Jeffrey Epstein may have played a role in introducing Melania Trump to Donald Trump, directly contradicting prior public denials that any such connection existed. The information suggests that Epstein’s...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Newly surfaced FBI material indicates that Jeffrey Epstein may have played a role in introducing Melania Trump to Donald Trump, directly contradicting prior public denials that any such connection existed. The information suggests that Epstein’s social network extended into the circumstances surrounding how the two met, raising questions about earlier efforts to distance that relationship from him. This contradiction has intensified scrutiny, particularly as officials and public figures continue to push narratives that minimize or deny Epstein’s proximity to influential circles.<br /><br /><br />The information traces back to an FBI FD-302 interview with Adriana Ross, one of Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime associates, in which she described elements of Epstein’s social orbit and interactions with high-profile figures. In that interview summary, Ross allegedly indicated that Epstein had a role in facilitating the introduction between Melania and Donald Trump, placing him closer to that moment than publicly acknowledged. Because FD-302s are internal FBI records that capture agents’ recollections of witness statements rather than verbatim transcripts, the account reflects what Ross told investigators at the time, adding a layer of evidentiary significance while still leaving room for interpretation and dispute.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00090773.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00090773.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1138</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>From Donor Lodge to Demolition Site: Interlochen’s Epstein Problem (5/28/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/from-donor-lodge-to-demolition-site-interlochen-s-epstein-problem-5-28-26--72211473</link><description><![CDATA[Interlochen Center for the Arts is moving to demolish Green Lake Lodge, a building originally funded by Jeffrey Epstein and once named for him before the school stripped his name from campus after learning of his 2009 criminal conviction. Epstein had attended Interlochen’s summer camp in 1967 and later donated to the institution from 1990 to 2003. The lodge, built along Green Lake, was used to house donors and, at times, Epstein himself. Interlochen says it previously investigated his activities on campus after his first conviction and again after his 2019 arrest, claiming it found no evidence that Epstein committed crimes at the school. Still, the building has become impossible for the institution to separate from Epstein’s legacy, and Interlochen’s board says demolishing it is now the appropriate step.<br /><br />The renewed scrutiny comes after recently released Justice Department files and prior reporting showed Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell met alone with at least one student at the lodge, an encounter the woman later described as the beginning of grooming behavior. Interlochen says it does not allow unsupervised donor-student visits, but that claim only raises more questions about how Epstein and Maxwell ended up alone with a student in the first place. Michigan lawmakers have signaled plans to investigate Epstein’s activities at Interlochen, while the school says it has cooperated with investigators and will respond to oversight bodies as needed. The demolition may remove the physical structure, but it does not erase the larger issue: Epstein was embedded deeply enough in elite institutions that even a children’s arts camp in northern Michigan became part of the long, ugly paper trail.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.abc12.com/news/interlochen-to-demolish-lodge-tied-to-jeffrey-epstein/article_5871d225-10f8-4989-a0e2-75c2fbf7751f.html#google_vignette" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Interlochen to demolish lodge tied to Jeffrey Epstein | News | abc12.com</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72211473</guid><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72211473/interlochenclosing.mp3" length="10585278" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/71f7b178-9194-4774-a80a-9d37d1214cb3/71f7b178-9194-4774-a80a-9d37d1214cb3.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/71f7b178-9194-4774-a80a-9d37d1214cb3/71f7b178-9194-4774-a80a-9d37d1214cb3.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/71f7b178-9194-4774-a80a-9d37d1214cb3/71f7b178-9194-4774-a80a-9d37d1214cb3.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Interlochen Center for the Arts is moving to demolish Green Lake Lodge, a building originally funded by Jeffrey Epstein and once named for him before the school stripped his name from campus after learning of his 2009 criminal conviction. Epstein had...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Interlochen Center for the Arts is moving to demolish Green Lake Lodge, a building originally funded by Jeffrey Epstein and once named for him before the school stripped his name from campus after learning of his 2009 criminal conviction. Epstein had attended Interlochen’s summer camp in 1967 and later donated to the institution from 1990 to 2003. The lodge, built along Green Lake, was used to house donors and, at times, Epstein himself. Interlochen says it previously investigated his activities on campus after his first conviction and again after his 2019 arrest, claiming it found no evidence that Epstein committed crimes at the school. Still, the building has become impossible for the institution to separate from Epstein’s legacy, and Interlochen’s board says demolishing it is now the appropriate step.<br /><br />The renewed scrutiny comes after recently released Justice Department files and prior reporting showed Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell met alone with at least one student at the lodge, an encounter the woman later described as the beginning of grooming behavior. Interlochen says it does not allow unsupervised donor-student visits, but that claim only raises more questions about how Epstein and Maxwell ended up alone with a student in the first place. Michigan lawmakers have signaled plans to investigate Epstein’s activities at Interlochen, while the school says it has cooperated with investigators and will respond to oversight bodies as needed. The demolition may remove the physical structure, but it does not erase the larger issue: Epstein was embedded deeply enough in elite institutions that even a children’s arts camp in northern Michigan became part of the long, ugly paper trail.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.abc12.com/news/interlochen-to-demolish-lodge-tied-to-jeffrey-epstein/article_5871d225-10f8-4989-a0e2-75c2fbf7751f.html#google_vignette" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Interlochen to demolish lodge tied to Jeffrey Epstein | News | abc12.com</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>662</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Jeffrey Epstein and the Latin American Power Brokers Around His Network (Part 2) (5/28/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/jeffrey-epstein-and-the-latin-american-power-brokers-around-his-network-part-2-5-28-26--72190073</link><description><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein’s reach extended far beyond New York, Palm Beach, and the familiar circles of American finance and politics. Newly surfaced records show him probing for influence and opportunity across Latin America and the Caribbean, including Venezuela and Cuba, where he appeared to position himself as a connector for businessmen, political insiders, and power brokers operating in difficult, sensitive, or sanctions-adjacent environments. One major thread involves Epstein advising DP World’s Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem after Hugo Chávez nationalized Venezuelan ports, with Epstein suggesting Cuba as a possible backchannel route into Caracas. Another involves Venezuelan businessman Francisco D’Agostino and discussions about potential oil opportunities connected to PDVSA and the Orinoco River oil fields. D’Agostino says the proposed Venezuela trip never happened and no deal came together, but the records still show Epstein attempting to place himself near the intersection of energy, politics, and elite access.<br /><br />The Cuba material follows the same pattern. Epstein traveled there in 2003 with Ghislaine Maxwell and former Colombian president Andrés Pastrana, and Maxwell later claimed they met Fidel Castro, though there is no clear evidence that Epstein conducted business or political negotiations with Castro. Years later, Epstein funded a Cuban state-backed neuroscience conference in Havana through his connection to researcher Gino Yu, fitting his larger pattern of using science, academia, and intellectual circles as a legitimacy machine. The larger takeaway is not that every one of Epstein’s approaches produced a successful deal; many appear to have stalled or gone nowhere. The real significance is that a convicted sex offender with a history of elite protection was still moving through circles connected to foreign governments, oil wealth, port infrastructure, sanctioned economies, and high-level intermediaries, raising the same old question: who kept allowing this man access to rooms where he clearly did not belong?<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/article315447900.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">How Epstein explored Venezuelan deals, funded Cuban research | Miami Herald</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72190073</guid><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 18:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72190073/epsteinvenuzuela2.mp3" length="11541151" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/23f34f28-65dd-41ad-a0aa-c6f3f9442f65/23f34f28-65dd-41ad-a0aa-c6f3f9442f65.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/23f34f28-65dd-41ad-a0aa-c6f3f9442f65/23f34f28-65dd-41ad-a0aa-c6f3f9442f65.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/23f34f28-65dd-41ad-a0aa-c6f3f9442f65/23f34f28-65dd-41ad-a0aa-c6f3f9442f65.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jeffrey Epstein’s reach extended far beyond New York, Palm Beach, and the familiar circles of American finance and politics. Newly surfaced records show him probing for influence and opportunity across Latin America and the Caribbean, including...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein’s reach extended far beyond New York, Palm Beach, and the familiar circles of American finance and politics. Newly surfaced records show him probing for influence and opportunity across Latin America and the Caribbean, including Venezuela and Cuba, where he appeared to position himself as a connector for businessmen, political insiders, and power brokers operating in difficult, sensitive, or sanctions-adjacent environments. One major thread involves Epstein advising DP World’s Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem after Hugo Chávez nationalized Venezuelan ports, with Epstein suggesting Cuba as a possible backchannel route into Caracas. Another involves Venezuelan businessman Francisco D’Agostino and discussions about potential oil opportunities connected to PDVSA and the Orinoco River oil fields. D’Agostino says the proposed Venezuela trip never happened and no deal came together, but the records still show Epstein attempting to place himself near the intersection of energy, politics, and elite access.<br /><br />The Cuba material follows the same pattern. Epstein traveled there in 2003 with Ghislaine Maxwell and former Colombian president Andrés Pastrana, and Maxwell later claimed they met Fidel Castro, though there is no clear evidence that Epstein conducted business or political negotiations with Castro. Years later, Epstein funded a Cuban state-backed neuroscience conference in Havana through his connection to researcher Gino Yu, fitting his larger pattern of using science, academia, and intellectual circles as a legitimacy machine. The larger takeaway is not that every one of Epstein’s approaches produced a successful deal; many appear to have stalled or gone nowhere. The real significance is that a convicted sex offender with a history of elite protection was still moving through circles connected to foreign governments, oil wealth, port infrastructure, sanctioned economies, and high-level intermediaries, raising the same old question: who kept allowing this man access to rooms where he clearly did not belong?<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/article315447900.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">How Epstein explored Venezuelan deals, funded Cuban research | Miami Herald</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>722</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Jeffrey Epstein and the Latin American Power Brokers Around His Network (Part 1) (5/28/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/jeffrey-epstein-and-the-latin-american-power-brokers-around-his-network-part-1-5-28-26--72190071</link><description><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein’s reach extended far beyond New York, Palm Beach, and the familiar circles of American finance and politics. Newly surfaced records show him probing for influence and opportunity across Latin America and the Caribbean, including Venezuela and Cuba, where he appeared to position himself as a connector for businessmen, political insiders, and power brokers operating in difficult, sensitive, or sanctions-adjacent environments. One major thread involves Epstein advising DP World’s Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem after Hugo Chávez nationalized Venezuelan ports, with Epstein suggesting Cuba as a possible backchannel route into Caracas. Another involves Venezuelan businessman Francisco D’Agostino and discussions about potential oil opportunities connected to PDVSA and the Orinoco River oil fields. D’Agostino says the proposed Venezuela trip never happened and no deal came together, but the records still show Epstein attempting to place himself near the intersection of energy, politics, and elite access.<br /><br />The Cuba material follows the same pattern. Epstein traveled there in 2003 with Ghislaine Maxwell and former Colombian president Andrés Pastrana, and Maxwell later claimed they met Fidel Castro, though there is no clear evidence that Epstein conducted business or political negotiations with Castro. Years later, Epstein funded a Cuban state-backed neuroscience conference in Havana through his connection to researcher Gino Yu, fitting his larger pattern of using science, academia, and intellectual circles as a legitimacy machine. The larger takeaway is not that every one of Epstein’s approaches produced a successful deal; many appear to have stalled or gone nowhere. The real significance is that a convicted sex offender with a history of elite protection was still moving through circles connected to foreign governments, oil wealth, port infrastructure, sanctioned economies, and high-level intermediaries, raising the same old question: who kept allowing this man access to rooms where he clearly did not belong?<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/article315447900.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">How Epstein explored Venezuelan deals, funded Cuban research | Miami Herald</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72190071</guid><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72190071/epsteinvenuzuela1.mp3" length="12705167" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d89a8235-9a3f-4af2-a4c7-cda144460d1c/d89a8235-9a3f-4af2-a4c7-cda144460d1c.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d89a8235-9a3f-4af2-a4c7-cda144460d1c/d89a8235-9a3f-4af2-a4c7-cda144460d1c.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d89a8235-9a3f-4af2-a4c7-cda144460d1c/d89a8235-9a3f-4af2-a4c7-cda144460d1c.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jeffrey Epstein’s reach extended far beyond New York, Palm Beach, and the familiar circles of American finance and politics. Newly surfaced records show him probing for influence and opportunity across Latin America and the Caribbean, including...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein’s reach extended far beyond New York, Palm Beach, and the familiar circles of American finance and politics. Newly surfaced records show him probing for influence and opportunity across Latin America and the Caribbean, including Venezuela and Cuba, where he appeared to position himself as a connector for businessmen, political insiders, and power brokers operating in difficult, sensitive, or sanctions-adjacent environments. One major thread involves Epstein advising DP World’s Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem after Hugo Chávez nationalized Venezuelan ports, with Epstein suggesting Cuba as a possible backchannel route into Caracas. Another involves Venezuelan businessman Francisco D’Agostino and discussions about potential oil opportunities connected to PDVSA and the Orinoco River oil fields. D’Agostino says the proposed Venezuela trip never happened and no deal came together, but the records still show Epstein attempting to place himself near the intersection of energy, politics, and elite access.<br /><br />The Cuba material follows the same pattern. Epstein traveled there in 2003 with Ghislaine Maxwell and former Colombian president Andrés Pastrana, and Maxwell later claimed they met Fidel Castro, though there is no clear evidence that Epstein conducted business or political negotiations with Castro. Years later, Epstein funded a Cuban state-backed neuroscience conference in Havana through his connection to researcher Gino Yu, fitting his larger pattern of using science, academia, and intellectual circles as a legitimacy machine. The larger takeaway is not that every one of Epstein’s approaches produced a successful deal; many appear to have stalled or gone nowhere. The real significance is that a convicted sex offender with a history of elite protection was still moving through circles connected to foreign governments, oil wealth, port infrastructure, sanctioned economies, and high-level intermediaries, raising the same old question: who kept allowing this man access to rooms where he clearly did not belong?<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/article315447900.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">How Epstein explored Venezuelan deals, funded Cuban research | Miami Herald</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>795</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Doctors, the Donor, and the Epstein Paper Trail at Mount Sinai (5/28/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-doctors-the-donor-and-the-epstein-paper-trail-at-mount-sinai-5-28-26--72190072</link><description><![CDATA[Newly released Justice Department files show Jeffrey Epstein received extraordinary white-glove treatment from Mount Sinai, turning one of New York’s most prestigious medical systems into yet another elite institution where his money, access, and relationships appeared to open doors that ordinary people would never get near. The records describe Epstein arranging medical care not only for himself, but for women and associates in his orbit, including referrals, appointments, house calls, and procedures coordinated through well-connected doctors. One of the key figures was Dr. Eva Andersson-Dubin, Epstein’s former girlfriend and a major Mount Sinai figure tied to the Dubin Breast Center, whose communications with Epstein showed how deeply he remained connected to the institution years after his 2008 conviction. The files also point to plastic surgeon Dr. Jess Ting, who allegedly provided treatment outside normal hospital settings, including a reported incident where a woman injured on Epstein’s island was stitched up at Epstein’s Manhattan home.<br /><br />The larger issue is not simply that Epstein knew doctors or donated money; it is that the documents suggest he was able to bend elite medical access around himself like everything else in his life. Mount Sinai has condemned Epstein and said it is reviewing its past ties to him, while doctors named in the files have denied knowing about his criminal conduct. But the paper trail is still ugly: Epstein donated hundreds of thousands of dollars, sought special access, moved women through medical channels, and remained close enough to influential professionals that even after becoming a registered sex offender, he could still operate with the comfort of a man who believed institutions would accommodate him. The Mount Sinai material fits the broader Epstein pattern perfectly — money, prestige, favors, and proximity creating an ecosystem where powerful people treated a predator less like a liability and more like a client worth keeping happy.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.rawstory.com/jeffrey-epstein-mount-sinai/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Prestigious hospital gave Epstein 24/7 access, house calls and other favors: report - Raw Story</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72190072</guid><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72190072/epsteinmtsinaihospital.mp3" length="10561872" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/29b51664-74aa-4f0e-93a3-58130d30e224/29b51664-74aa-4f0e-93a3-58130d30e224.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/29b51664-74aa-4f0e-93a3-58130d30e224/29b51664-74aa-4f0e-93a3-58130d30e224.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/29b51664-74aa-4f0e-93a3-58130d30e224/29b51664-74aa-4f0e-93a3-58130d30e224.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Newly released Justice Department files show Jeffrey Epstein received extraordinary white-glove treatment from Mount Sinai, turning one of New York’s most prestigious medical systems into yet another elite institution where his money, access, and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Newly released Justice Department files show Jeffrey Epstein received extraordinary white-glove treatment from Mount Sinai, turning one of New York’s most prestigious medical systems into yet another elite institution where his money, access, and relationships appeared to open doors that ordinary people would never get near. The records describe Epstein arranging medical care not only for himself, but for women and associates in his orbit, including referrals, appointments, house calls, and procedures coordinated through well-connected doctors. One of the key figures was Dr. Eva Andersson-Dubin, Epstein’s former girlfriend and a major Mount Sinai figure tied to the Dubin Breast Center, whose communications with Epstein showed how deeply he remained connected to the institution years after his 2008 conviction. The files also point to plastic surgeon Dr. Jess Ting, who allegedly provided treatment outside normal hospital settings, including a reported incident where a woman injured on Epstein’s island was stitched up at Epstein’s Manhattan home.<br /><br />The larger issue is not simply that Epstein knew doctors or donated money; it is that the documents suggest he was able to bend elite medical access around himself like everything else in his life. Mount Sinai has condemned Epstein and said it is reviewing its past ties to him, while doctors named in the files have denied knowing about his criminal conduct. But the paper trail is still ugly: Epstein donated hundreds of thousands of dollars, sought special access, moved women through medical channels, and remained close enough to influential professionals that even after becoming a registered sex offender, he could still operate with the comfort of a man who believed institutions would accommodate him. The Mount Sinai material fits the broader Epstein pattern perfectly — money, prestige, favors, and proximity creating an ecosystem where powerful people treated a predator less like a liability and more like a client worth keeping happy.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.rawstory.com/jeffrey-epstein-mount-sinai/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Prestigious hospital gave Epstein 24/7 access, house calls and other favors: report - Raw Story</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>661</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Captain Of Security Operations At MCC And His OIG Deposition (Part 1) (5/28/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-captain-of-security-operations-at-mcc-and-his-oig-deposition-part-1-5-28-26--72190076</link><description><![CDATA[The document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s death. The captain described the command structure inside the jail, including his role supervising lieutenants and reporting up to associate wardens or the warden, while investigators walked him through staffing, rosters, post assignments, suicide-watch procedures, SHU operations, and the chain of responsibility on August 9–10, 2019. The transcript is important because it does not present Epstein’s death as a clean, orderly institutional event; instead, it shows a jail struggling with bad staffing, confusing handoffs, unfilled posts, questionable paperwork, and a command structure where critical responsibilities appear to have been either missed, misunderstood, or passed around.<br /><br /><br />The most serious value of the interview is in the irregularities it surfaces. The captain reportedly discussed inaccurate rosters or logs, acknowledged questions around skipped SHU rounds, addressed the fact that Epstein had previously been on suicide watch, and said he would not necessarily have known in real time if officers were failing to conduct required checks. Even more troubling, he expressed concern that certain documents may have been deliberately removed from files that should have been reviewed or audited, and investigators also raised an inmate-count issue involving an inmate named Reyes, whose release may not have been properly reflected in the institution’s count — something the captain treated as a protocol violation. Taken together, the transcript adds another layer to the larger Epstein death record: not a single clean explanation, but a bureaucratic mess of missing or questionable documentation, staffing failures, broken supervision, and institutional chaos at precisely the moment when the most high-profile federal inmate in America was supposed to be under careful control.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00111830.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00111830.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72190076</guid><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72190076/dardenoig1.mp3" length="13155309" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4676fe73-5a7a-4cee-a970-88a2c26bab16/4676fe73-5a7a-4cee-a970-88a2c26bab16.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4676fe73-5a7a-4cee-a970-88a2c26bab16/4676fe73-5a7a-4cee-a970-88a2c26bab16.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4676fe73-5a7a-4cee-a970-88a2c26bab16/4676fe73-5a7a-4cee-a970-88a2c26bab16.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s death. The captain described the command...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s death. The captain described the command structure inside the jail, including his role supervising lieutenants and reporting up to associate wardens or the warden, while investigators walked him through staffing, rosters, post assignments, suicide-watch procedures, SHU operations, and the chain of responsibility on August 9–10, 2019. The transcript is important because it does not present Epstein’s death as a clean, orderly institutional event; instead, it shows a jail struggling with bad staffing, confusing handoffs, unfilled posts, questionable paperwork, and a command structure where critical responsibilities appear to have been either missed, misunderstood, or passed around.<br /><br /><br />The most serious value of the interview is in the irregularities it surfaces. The captain reportedly discussed inaccurate rosters or logs, acknowledged questions around skipped SHU rounds, addressed the fact that Epstein had previously been on suicide watch, and said he would not necessarily have known in real time if officers were failing to conduct required checks. Even more troubling, he expressed concern that certain documents may have been deliberately removed from files that should have been reviewed or audited, and investigators also raised an inmate-count issue involving an inmate named Reyes, whose release may not have been properly reflected in the institution’s count — something the captain treated as a protocol violation. Taken together, the transcript adds another layer to the larger Epstein death record: not a single clean explanation, but a bureaucratic mess of missing or questionable documentation, staffing failures, broken supervision, and institutional chaos at precisely the moment when the most high-profile federal inmate in America was supposed to be under careful control.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00111830.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00111830.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>823</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition: Johanna Sjoberg's Deposition In The Maxwell/Virginia Roberts Suit (Part 7-10) (5/28/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-johanna-sjoberg-s-deposition-in-the-maxwell-virginia-roberts-suit-part-7-10-5-28-26--72189160</link><description><![CDATA[In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.<br /><br /><br />Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein’s company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein’s residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg’s deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72189160</guid><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72189160/megasjo7n8n9n10.mp3" length="49757666" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d66ddeaa-5c9f-47fd-9a43-b702c59dae4e/d66ddeaa-5c9f-47fd-9a43-b702c59dae4e.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d66ddeaa-5c9f-47fd-9a43-b702c59dae4e/d66ddeaa-5c9f-47fd-9a43-b702c59dae4e.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d66ddeaa-5c9f-47fd-9a43-b702c59dae4e/d66ddeaa-5c9f-47fd-9a43-b702c59dae4e.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.<br /><br /><br />Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein’s company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein’s residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg’s deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3110</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition: Johanna Sjoberg's Deposition In The Maxwell/Virginia Roberts Suit (Part 4-6) (5/28/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-johanna-sjoberg-s-deposition-in-the-maxwell-virginia-roberts-suit-part-4-6-5-28-26--72189166</link><description><![CDATA[In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.<br /><br /><br />Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein’s company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein’s residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg’s deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72189166</guid><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72189166/megasjo4n5n6.mp3" length="41530558" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5eafaba9-d66c-4c4f-aec3-29470ca1077a/5eafaba9-d66c-4c4f-aec3-29470ca1077a.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5eafaba9-d66c-4c4f-aec3-29470ca1077a/5eafaba9-d66c-4c4f-aec3-29470ca1077a.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/5eafaba9-d66c-4c4f-aec3-29470ca1077a/5eafaba9-d66c-4c4f-aec3-29470ca1077a.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.<br /><br /><br />Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein’s company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein’s residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg’s deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2596</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition: Johanna Sjoberg's Deposition In The Maxwell/Virginia Roberts Suit (Part 1-3) (5/27/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-johanna-sjoberg-s-deposition-in-the-maxwell-virginia-roberts-suit-part-1-3-5-27-26--72189161</link><description><![CDATA[In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.<br /><br /><br />Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein’s company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein’s residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg’s deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72189161</guid><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72189161/megasjo1n2n3.mp3" length="40378662" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/77dfac02-8366-4d4f-b6fe-44d94b2dcae7/77dfac02-8366-4d4f-b6fe-44d94b2dcae7.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/77dfac02-8366-4d4f-b6fe-44d94b2dcae7/77dfac02-8366-4d4f-b6fe-44d94b2dcae7.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/77dfac02-8366-4d4f-b6fe-44d94b2dcae7/77dfac02-8366-4d4f-b6fe-44d94b2dcae7.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.<br /><br /><br />Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein’s company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein’s residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg’s deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2524</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Adriana Ross FBI 302 Raises Questions on Epstein’s Role in Trump–Melania Introduction (Part 4)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/adriana-ross-fbi-302-raises-questions-on-epstein-s-role-in-trump-melania-introduction-part-4--72186847</link><description><![CDATA[Newly surfaced FBI material indicates that Jeffrey Epstein may have played a role in introducing Melania Trump to Donald Trump, directly contradicting prior public denials that any such connection existed. The information suggests that Epstein’s social network extended into the circumstances surrounding how the two met, raising questions about earlier efforts to distance that relationship from him. This contradiction has intensified scrutiny, particularly as officials and public figures continue to push narratives that minimize or deny Epstein’s proximity to influential circles.<br /><br /><br />The information traces back to an FBI FD-302 interview with Adriana Ross, one of Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime associates, in which she described elements of Epstein’s social orbit and interactions with high-profile figures. In that interview summary, Ross allegedly indicated that Epstein had a role in facilitating the introduction between Melania and Donald Trump, placing him closer to that moment than publicly acknowledged. Because FD-302s are internal FBI records that capture agents’ recollections of witness statements rather than verbatim transcripts, the account reflects what Ross told investigators at the time, adding a layer of evidentiary significance while still leaving room for interpretation and dispute.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00090773.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00090773.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72186847</guid><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72186847/adrianaross302part4.mp3" length="13949431" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/158533eb-dc8e-4d34-969d-2c614e4e0b04/158533eb-dc8e-4d34-969d-2c614e4e0b04.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/158533eb-dc8e-4d34-969d-2c614e4e0b04/158533eb-dc8e-4d34-969d-2c614e4e0b04.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/158533eb-dc8e-4d34-969d-2c614e4e0b04/158533eb-dc8e-4d34-969d-2c614e4e0b04.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Newly surfaced FBI material indicates that Jeffrey Epstein may have played a role in introducing Melania Trump to Donald Trump, directly contradicting prior public denials that any such connection existed. The information suggests that Epstein’s...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Newly surfaced FBI material indicates that Jeffrey Epstein may have played a role in introducing Melania Trump to Donald Trump, directly contradicting prior public denials that any such connection existed. The information suggests that Epstein’s social network extended into the circumstances surrounding how the two met, raising questions about earlier efforts to distance that relationship from him. This contradiction has intensified scrutiny, particularly as officials and public figures continue to push narratives that minimize or deny Epstein’s proximity to influential circles.<br /><br /><br />The information traces back to an FBI FD-302 interview with Adriana Ross, one of Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime associates, in which she described elements of Epstein’s social orbit and interactions with high-profile figures. In that interview summary, Ross allegedly indicated that Epstein had a role in facilitating the introduction between Melania and Donald Trump, placing him closer to that moment than publicly acknowledged. Because FD-302s are internal FBI records that capture agents’ recollections of witness statements rather than verbatim transcripts, the account reflects what Ross told investigators at the time, adding a layer of evidentiary significance while still leaving room for interpretation and dispute.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00090773.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00090773.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>872</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Adriana Ross FBI 302 Raises Questions on Epstein’s Role in Trump–Melania Introduction (Part 3)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/adriana-ross-fbi-302-raises-questions-on-epstein-s-role-in-trump-melania-introduction-part-3--72186843</link><description><![CDATA[Newly surfaced FBI material indicates that Jeffrey Epstein may have played a role in introducing Melania Trump to Donald Trump, directly contradicting prior public denials that any such connection existed. The information suggests that Epstein’s social network extended into the circumstances surrounding how the two met, raising questions about earlier efforts to distance that relationship from him. This contradiction has intensified scrutiny, particularly as officials and public figures continue to push narratives that minimize or deny Epstein’s proximity to influential circles.<br /><br /><br />The information traces back to an FBI FD-302 interview with Adriana Ross, one of Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime associates, in which she described elements of Epstein’s social orbit and interactions with high-profile figures. In that interview summary, Ross allegedly indicated that Epstein had a role in facilitating the introduction between Melania and Donald Trump, placing him closer to that moment than publicly acknowledged. Because FD-302s are internal FBI records that capture agents’ recollections of witness statements rather than verbatim transcripts, the account reflects what Ross told investigators at the time, adding a layer of evidentiary significance while still leaving room for interpretation and dispute.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00090773.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00090773.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72186843</guid><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72186843/adrianaross302part3.mp3" length="11010342" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ecd69439-d411-4442-93f6-7542c5743d0a/ecd69439-d411-4442-93f6-7542c5743d0a.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ecd69439-d411-4442-93f6-7542c5743d0a/ecd69439-d411-4442-93f6-7542c5743d0a.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ecd69439-d411-4442-93f6-7542c5743d0a/ecd69439-d411-4442-93f6-7542c5743d0a.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Newly surfaced FBI material indicates that Jeffrey Epstein may have played a role in introducing Melania Trump to Donald Trump, directly contradicting prior public denials that any such connection existed. The information suggests that Epstein’s...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Newly surfaced FBI material indicates that Jeffrey Epstein may have played a role in introducing Melania Trump to Donald Trump, directly contradicting prior public denials that any such connection existed. The information suggests that Epstein’s social network extended into the circumstances surrounding how the two met, raising questions about earlier efforts to distance that relationship from him. This contradiction has intensified scrutiny, particularly as officials and public figures continue to push narratives that minimize or deny Epstein’s proximity to influential circles.<br /><br /><br />The information traces back to an FBI FD-302 interview with Adriana Ross, one of Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime associates, in which she described elements of Epstein’s social orbit and interactions with high-profile figures. In that interview summary, Ross allegedly indicated that Epstein had a role in facilitating the introduction between Melania and Donald Trump, placing him closer to that moment than publicly acknowledged. Because FD-302s are internal FBI records that capture agents’ recollections of witness statements rather than verbatim transcripts, the account reflects what Ross told investigators at the time, adding a layer of evidentiary significance while still leaving room for interpretation and dispute.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00090773.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00090773.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>689</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Adriana Ross FBI 302 Raises Questions on Epstein’s Role in Trump–Melania Introduction (Part 2)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/adriana-ross-fbi-302-raises-questions-on-epstein-s-role-in-trump-melania-introduction-part-2--72186849</link><description><![CDATA[Newly surfaced FBI material indicates that Jeffrey Epstein may have played a role in introducing Melania Trump to Donald Trump, directly contradicting prior public denials that any such connection existed. The information suggests that Epstein’s social network extended into the circumstances surrounding how the two met, raising questions about earlier efforts to distance that relationship from him. This contradiction has intensified scrutiny, particularly as officials and public figures continue to push narratives that minimize or deny Epstein’s proximity to influential circles.<br /><br /><br />The information traces back to an FBI FD-302 interview with Adriana Ross, one of Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime associates, in which she described elements of Epstein’s social orbit and interactions with high-profile figures. In that interview summary, Ross allegedly indicated that Epstein had a role in facilitating the introduction between Melania and Donald Trump, placing him closer to that moment than publicly acknowledged. Because FD-302s are internal FBI records that capture agents’ recollections of witness statements rather than verbatim transcripts, the account reflects what Ross told investigators at the time, adding a layer of evidentiary significance while still leaving room for interpretation and dispute.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00090773.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00090773.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72186849</guid><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72186849/adrianaross302part2.mp3" length="14160919" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/12912e60-6e5b-46ec-a2c7-57b55d3bdec6/12912e60-6e5b-46ec-a2c7-57b55d3bdec6.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/12912e60-6e5b-46ec-a2c7-57b55d3bdec6/12912e60-6e5b-46ec-a2c7-57b55d3bdec6.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/12912e60-6e5b-46ec-a2c7-57b55d3bdec6/12912e60-6e5b-46ec-a2c7-57b55d3bdec6.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Newly surfaced FBI material indicates that Jeffrey Epstein may have played a role in introducing Melania Trump to Donald Trump, directly contradicting prior public denials that any such connection existed. The information suggests that Epstein’s...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Newly surfaced FBI material indicates that Jeffrey Epstein may have played a role in introducing Melania Trump to Donald Trump, directly contradicting prior public denials that any such connection existed. The information suggests that Epstein’s social network extended into the circumstances surrounding how the two met, raising questions about earlier efforts to distance that relationship from him. This contradiction has intensified scrutiny, particularly as officials and public figures continue to push narratives that minimize or deny Epstein’s proximity to influential circles.<br /><br /><br />The information traces back to an FBI FD-302 interview with Adriana Ross, one of Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime associates, in which she described elements of Epstein’s social orbit and interactions with high-profile figures. In that interview summary, Ross allegedly indicated that Epstein had a role in facilitating the introduction between Melania and Donald Trump, placing him closer to that moment than publicly acknowledged. Because FD-302s are internal FBI records that capture agents’ recollections of witness statements rather than verbatim transcripts, the account reflects what Ross told investigators at the time, adding a layer of evidentiary significance while still leaving room for interpretation and dispute.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00090773.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00090773.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>886</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Adriana Ross FBI 302 Raises Questions on Epstein’s Role in Trump–Melania Introduction (Part 1)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/adriana-ross-fbi-302-raises-questions-on-epstein-s-role-in-trump-melania-introduction-part-1--72186848</link><description><![CDATA[Newly surfaced FBI material indicates that Jeffrey Epstein may have played a role in introducing Melania Trump to Donald Trump, directly contradicting prior public denials that any such connection existed. The information suggests that Epstein’s social network extended into the circumstances surrounding how the two met, raising questions about earlier efforts to distance that relationship from him. This contradiction has intensified scrutiny, particularly as officials and public figures continue to push narratives that minimize or deny Epstein’s proximity to influential circles.<br /><br /><br />The information traces back to an FBI FD-302 interview with Adriana Ross, one of Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime associates, in which she described elements of Epstein’s social orbit and interactions with high-profile figures. In that interview summary, Ross allegedly indicated that Epstein had a role in facilitating the introduction between Melania and Donald Trump, placing him closer to that moment than publicly acknowledged. Because FD-302s are internal FBI records that capture agents’ recollections of witness statements rather than verbatim transcripts, the account reflects what Ross told investigators at the time, adding a layer of evidentiary significance while still leaving room for interpretation and dispute.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00090773.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00090773.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72186848</guid><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72186848/adrianaross302part1.mp3" length="11182959" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e5e22a8e-2afc-4428-b150-3d8f9f3c2ef7/e5e22a8e-2afc-4428-b150-3d8f9f3c2ef7.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e5e22a8e-2afc-4428-b150-3d8f9f3c2ef7/e5e22a8e-2afc-4428-b150-3d8f9f3c2ef7.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e5e22a8e-2afc-4428-b150-3d8f9f3c2ef7/e5e22a8e-2afc-4428-b150-3d8f9f3c2ef7.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Newly surfaced FBI material indicates that Jeffrey Epstein may have played a role in introducing Melania Trump to Donald Trump, directly contradicting prior public denials that any such connection existed. The information suggests that Epstein’s...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Newly surfaced FBI material indicates that Jeffrey Epstein may have played a role in introducing Melania Trump to Donald Trump, directly contradicting prior public denials that any such connection existed. The information suggests that Epstein’s social network extended into the circumstances surrounding how the two met, raising questions about earlier efforts to distance that relationship from him. This contradiction has intensified scrutiny, particularly as officials and public figures continue to push narratives that minimize or deny Epstein’s proximity to influential circles.<br /><br /><br />The information traces back to an FBI FD-302 interview with Adriana Ross, one of Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime associates, in which she described elements of Epstein’s social orbit and interactions with high-profile figures. In that interview summary, Ross allegedly indicated that Epstein had a role in facilitating the introduction between Melania and Donald Trump, placing him closer to that moment than publicly acknowledged. Because FD-302s are internal FBI records that capture agents’ recollections of witness statements rather than verbatim transcripts, the account reflects what Ross told investigators at the time, adding a layer of evidentiary significance while still leaving room for interpretation and dispute.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00090773.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00090773.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>699</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Sarah Kellen Names Three People During Her Appearance Before Congress (5/27/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/sarah-kellen-names-three-people-during-her-appearance-before-congress-5-27-26--72186934</link><description><![CDATA[Sarah Kellen Vickers, Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime assistant and one of the women named in his 2007 non-prosecution agreement as a potential co-conspirator, reportedly told congressional investigators that she was not an accomplice in Epstein’s abuse operation but one of his victims. In closed-door testimony before the House Oversight Committee, Kellen denied helping Epstein traffic or abuse girls and instead described herself as someone who was sexually and psychologically abused by Epstein for more than a decade. She claimed Epstein manipulated, controlled, and “gaslit” her, and she pushed back against the long-standing public portrayal of her as a key operator inside his network. Her account attempts to recast her role from suspected facilitator to exploited subordinate, arguing that she lacked real power inside Epstein’s orbit and was trapped by dependence, coercion, and abuse.<br /><br />The testimony is significant because Kellen has long been treated as one of the most important unanswered figures in the Epstein case: she worked close to Epstein, was accused by victims of helping arrange encounters, and was shielded from federal prosecution by the controversial Florida deal that protected named and unnamed potential co-conspirators. According to the reporting, Kellen also gave investigators names of additional people allegedly connected to Epstein’s abuse network, which lawmakers described as a potentially important lead. But her testimony also creates a central tension for investigators and the public: whether Kellen’s claims of victimization explain her conduct, or whether they collide with years of allegations that she helped keep Epstein’s machinery running. Either way, her appearance before Congress puts one of Epstein’s most scrutinized former insiders back at the center of the investigation.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.cnn.com/2026/05/22/politics/sarah-kellen-epstein-abuse-allegations" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Here is who Epstein’s longtime assistant accused of sexual abuse | CNN Politics</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72186934</guid><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72186934/kellen3names.mp3" length="19840148" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7cd7c408-8238-4fcd-b113-8d6ff3a1d53e/7cd7c408-8238-4fcd-b113-8d6ff3a1d53e.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7cd7c408-8238-4fcd-b113-8d6ff3a1d53e/7cd7c408-8238-4fcd-b113-8d6ff3a1d53e.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7cd7c408-8238-4fcd-b113-8d6ff3a1d53e/7cd7c408-8238-4fcd-b113-8d6ff3a1d53e.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Sarah Kellen Vickers, Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime assistant and one of the women named in his 2007 non-prosecution agreement as a potential co-conspirator, reportedly told congressional investigators that she was not an accomplice in Epstein’s abuse...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Sarah Kellen Vickers, Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime assistant and one of the women named in his 2007 non-prosecution agreement as a potential co-conspirator, reportedly told congressional investigators that she was not an accomplice in Epstein’s abuse operation but one of his victims. In closed-door testimony before the House Oversight Committee, Kellen denied helping Epstein traffic or abuse girls and instead described herself as someone who was sexually and psychologically abused by Epstein for more than a decade. She claimed Epstein manipulated, controlled, and “gaslit” her, and she pushed back against the long-standing public portrayal of her as a key operator inside his network. Her account attempts to recast her role from suspected facilitator to exploited subordinate, arguing that she lacked real power inside Epstein’s orbit and was trapped by dependence, coercion, and abuse.<br /><br />The testimony is significant because Kellen has long been treated as one of the most important unanswered figures in the Epstein case: she worked close to Epstein, was accused by victims of helping arrange encounters, and was shielded from federal prosecution by the controversial Florida deal that protected named and unnamed potential co-conspirators. According to the reporting, Kellen also gave investigators names of additional people allegedly connected to Epstein’s abuse network, which lawmakers described as a potentially important lead. But her testimony also creates a central tension for investigators and the public: whether Kellen’s claims of victimization explain her conduct, or whether they collide with years of allegations that she helped keep Epstein’s machinery running. Either way, her appearance before Congress puts one of Epstein’s most scrutinized former insiders back at the center of the investigation.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.cnn.com/2026/05/22/politics/sarah-kellen-epstein-abuse-allegations" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Here is who Epstein’s longtime assistant accused of sexual abuse | CNN Politics</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1240</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>billgates,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epstein,epsteinisland,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,ghislainemaxwellupdates,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinnews,jeffreyepsteinnewsupdates,maxwellnewsupdates,news,newsupdate,princeandrew,princeandrewnews,theyallknew,truecrime,truecrimenewsreport</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and the Evidence Trail Virginia Left Behind (5/27/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/andrew-mountbatten-windsor-and-the-evidence-trail-virginia-left-behind-5-27-26--72183614</link><description><![CDATA[Police investigating Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor are reportedly seeking the Metropolitan Police files connected to Virginia Giuffre as part of a widening inquiry into alleged sexual misconduct, fraud, corruption, and misconduct in public office. The focus is not only on Giuffre’s long-standing allegations that Andrew sexually abused her when she was 17 after she was trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell — claims Andrew has denied — but also on what British authorities knew, what they previously reviewed, and whether earlier decisions by the Met left key material untouched. Giuffre gave a statement to the Met in 2015, later sued Andrew in the United States, and reached a multimillion-pound civil settlement with him in 2022 without any admission of liability. Now, after her death in 2025, investigators are reportedly looking back at those files to determine whether there is evidence that should feed into the current probe.<br /><br />The investigation also appears to be examining Andrew’s wider conduct around Epstein, including claims that he used or attempted to use official channels, taxpayer-funded protection officers, or confidential information to protect himself or discredit Giuffre. One major thread involves allegations that Andrew passed Giuffre’s personal information to a police protection officer in 2011 while trying to dig up damaging material on her shortly before the infamous photograph of Andrew, Giuffre, and Maxwell became public. The Met previously said it found no basis for further action on that issue, but Thames Valley Police are now reportedly reviewing the broader record, including past police handling, Andrew’s former royal protection detail, and evidence emerging from Epstein-related document releases. The significance is obvious: this is no longer just about Andrew’s old denials or the civil settlement — it is about whether British law enforcement failed to fully confront the Epstein connection when it mattered most.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-15847453/Police-Andrew-seek-late-accuser-Virginia-Giuffres-files.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Police probing Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor over 'sex offences' will 'seek late accuser Virginia Giuffre's files' | Daily Mail Online</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72183614</guid><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 18:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72183614/uklookingintovirginiaallegations.mp3" length="14949190" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7bd504c0-3184-4e01-a422-e51634b81af3/7bd504c0-3184-4e01-a422-e51634b81af3.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7bd504c0-3184-4e01-a422-e51634b81af3/7bd504c0-3184-4e01-a422-e51634b81af3.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7bd504c0-3184-4e01-a422-e51634b81af3/7bd504c0-3184-4e01-a422-e51634b81af3.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Police investigating Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor are reportedly seeking the Metropolitan Police files connected to Virginia Giuffre as part of a widening inquiry into alleged sexual misconduct, fraud, corruption, and misconduct in public office. The...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Police investigating Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor are reportedly seeking the Metropolitan Police files connected to Virginia Giuffre as part of a widening inquiry into alleged sexual misconduct, fraud, corruption, and misconduct in public office. The focus is not only on Giuffre’s long-standing allegations that Andrew sexually abused her when she was 17 after she was trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell — claims Andrew has denied — but also on what British authorities knew, what they previously reviewed, and whether earlier decisions by the Met left key material untouched. Giuffre gave a statement to the Met in 2015, later sued Andrew in the United States, and reached a multimillion-pound civil settlement with him in 2022 without any admission of liability. Now, after her death in 2025, investigators are reportedly looking back at those files to determine whether there is evidence that should feed into the current probe.<br /><br />The investigation also appears to be examining Andrew’s wider conduct around Epstein, including claims that he used or attempted to use official channels, taxpayer-funded protection officers, or confidential information to protect himself or discredit Giuffre. One major thread involves allegations that Andrew passed Giuffre’s personal information to a police protection officer in 2011 while trying to dig up damaging material on her shortly before the infamous photograph of Andrew, Giuffre, and Maxwell became public. The Met previously said it found no basis for further action on that issue, but Thames Valley Police are now reportedly reviewing the broader record, including past police handling, Andrew’s former royal protection detail, and evidence emerging from Epstein-related document releases. The significance is obvious: this is no longer just about Andrew’s old denials or the civil settlement — it is about whether British law enforcement failed to fully confront the Epstein connection when it mattered most.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-15847453/Police-Andrew-seek-late-accuser-Virginia-Giuffres-files.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Police probing Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor over 'sex offences' will 'seek late accuser Virginia Giuffre's files' | Daily Mail Online</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>935</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>billgates,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epstein,epsteinisland,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,ghislainemaxwellupdates,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinnews,jeffreyepsteinnewsupdates,maxwellnewsupdates,news,newsupdate,princeandrew,princeandrewnews,theyallknew,truecrime,truecrimenewsreport</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Epstein Files, the UFO Narrative, and the Politics of Distraction (5/27/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-epstein-files-the-ufo-narrative-and-the-politics-of-distraction-5-27-26--72183611</link><description><![CDATA[The whole alien “disclosure” push reeks like a giant shiny-object maneuver: when the Epstein files are still the unresolved scandal sitting in the middle of the room, suddenly the public is being invited to look up at the sky instead of down at the paper trail. The government can roll out UFO files, talk about “unprecedented transparency,” and tease the possibility of hidden knowledge, but that only makes the contrast sharper: if transparency is the principle, then why does the Epstein record remain so tangled in redactions, delays, survivor-privacy arguments stretched beyond their proper purpose, and bureaucratic fog? The satire works because the alien angle feels absurd on its face, but the underlying point is dead serious: the public is being handed spectacle while the most politically radioactive documents on Earth remain the thing nobody in power wants to fully confront.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72183611</guid><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72183611/alienswantepsteinfilestoo.mp3" length="23717555" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4e7cf84c-4fff-4b1b-bd3f-50ce57e5ba5d/4e7cf84c-4fff-4b1b-bd3f-50ce57e5ba5d.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4e7cf84c-4fff-4b1b-bd3f-50ce57e5ba5d/4e7cf84c-4fff-4b1b-bd3f-50ce57e5ba5d.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4e7cf84c-4fff-4b1b-bd3f-50ce57e5ba5d/4e7cf84c-4fff-4b1b-bd3f-50ce57e5ba5d.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The whole alien “disclosure” push reeks like a giant shiny-object maneuver: when the Epstein files are still the unresolved scandal sitting in the middle of the room, suddenly the public is being invited to look up at the sky instead of down at the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The whole alien “disclosure” push reeks like a giant shiny-object maneuver: when the Epstein files are still the unresolved scandal sitting in the middle of the room, suddenly the public is being invited to look up at the sky instead of down at the paper trail. The government can roll out UFO files, talk about “unprecedented transparency,” and tease the possibility of hidden knowledge, but that only makes the contrast sharper: if transparency is the principle, then why does the Epstein record remain so tangled in redactions, delays, survivor-privacy arguments stretched beyond their proper purpose, and bureaucratic fog? The satire works because the alien angle feels absurd on its face, but the underlying point is dead serious: the public is being handed spectacle while the most politically radioactive documents on Earth remain the thing nobody in power wants to fully confront.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1483</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>billgates,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epstein,epsteinisland,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,ghislainemaxwellupdates,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinnews,jeffreyepsteinnewsupdates,maxwellnewsupdates,news,newsupdate,princeandrew,princeandrewnews,theyallknew,truecrime,truecrimenewsreport</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Zorro Ranch 911 Logs Reveal Hang-Ups, Injuries, and a Thin Local Paper Trail (5/27/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/zorro-ranch-911-logs-reveal-hang-ups-injuries-and-a-thin-local-paper-trail-5-27-26--72183589</link><description><![CDATA[Dispatch logs obtained by The Santa Fe New Mexican show that emergency calls tied to Jeffrey Epstein’s Zorro Ranch in New Mexico were relatively limited and mostly mundane on paper: hang-up calls, medical issues, and recreational injuries rather than obvious criminal complaints. The logs appear to undercut the idea that local 911 records alone contain some obvious smoking gun about what was happening at the property, but they also highlight how little the public record captures about a ranch that has become one of the most under-examined locations in Epstein’s broader orbit. Zorro Ranch was a massive, secluded property outside Santa Fe, complete with a sprawling mansion, airstrip, helicopter pad, and guest facilities — exactly the kind of private compound that has drawn years of suspicion because of Epstein’s known pattern of using isolated luxury properties to conceal abuse.<br /><br />The larger significance is not that the 911 logs reveal a dramatic new criminal episode, but that they show how thin and incomplete the official local paper trail appears to be. A few emergency calls about hang-ups or injuries do not answer the deeper questions around who visited the ranch, what happened there, why it was not searched with the urgency applied to Epstein’s other properties, and whether federal authorities ever fully pursued the New Mexico angle. In that sense, the logs are less an endpoint than another reminder of the gap between the scale of public suspicion surrounding Zorro Ranch and the limited information that has been made available through official records.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.santafenewmexican.com/news/local_news/santa-fe-911-logs-show-hang-ups-recreational-injuries-at-epsteins-ranch/article_0cfca078-d3d2-43b6-93da-ba9771bd7bfe.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Santa Fe 911 logs show hang-ups, recreational injuries at Epstein's ranch | Local News | santafenewmexican.com</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72183589</guid><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72183589/zorroranch911calls.mp3" length="12051897" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b26bf8fc-f08b-4a14-ba25-54d0cae121e4/b26bf8fc-f08b-4a14-ba25-54d0cae121e4.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b26bf8fc-f08b-4a14-ba25-54d0cae121e4/b26bf8fc-f08b-4a14-ba25-54d0cae121e4.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b26bf8fc-f08b-4a14-ba25-54d0cae121e4/b26bf8fc-f08b-4a14-ba25-54d0cae121e4.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Dispatch logs obtained by The Santa Fe New Mexican show that emergency calls tied to Jeffrey Epstein’s Zorro Ranch in New Mexico were relatively limited and mostly mundane on paper: hang-up calls, medical issues, and recreational injuries rather than...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Dispatch logs obtained by The Santa Fe New Mexican show that emergency calls tied to Jeffrey Epstein’s Zorro Ranch in New Mexico were relatively limited and mostly mundane on paper: hang-up calls, medical issues, and recreational injuries rather than obvious criminal complaints. The logs appear to undercut the idea that local 911 records alone contain some obvious smoking gun about what was happening at the property, but they also highlight how little the public record captures about a ranch that has become one of the most under-examined locations in Epstein’s broader orbit. Zorro Ranch was a massive, secluded property outside Santa Fe, complete with a sprawling mansion, airstrip, helicopter pad, and guest facilities — exactly the kind of private compound that has drawn years of suspicion because of Epstein’s known pattern of using isolated luxury properties to conceal abuse.<br /><br />The larger significance is not that the 911 logs reveal a dramatic new criminal episode, but that they show how thin and incomplete the official local paper trail appears to be. A few emergency calls about hang-ups or injuries do not answer the deeper questions around who visited the ranch, what happened there, why it was not searched with the urgency applied to Epstein’s other properties, and whether federal authorities ever fully pursued the New Mexico angle. In that sense, the logs are less an endpoint than another reminder of the gap between the scale of public suspicion surrounding Zorro Ranch and the limited information that has been made available through official records.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.santafenewmexican.com/news/local_news/santa-fe-911-logs-show-hang-ups-recreational-injuries-at-epsteins-ranch/article_0cfca078-d3d2-43b6-93da-ba9771bd7bfe.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Santa Fe 911 logs show hang-ups, recreational injuries at Epstein's ranch | Local News | santafenewmexican.com</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>754</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverup</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Epstein Survivors Blast Todd Blanche And The DOJ After His Senate Hearing (5/27/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/epstein-survivors-blast-todd-blanche-and-the-doj-after-his-senate-hearing-5-27-26--72183612</link><description><![CDATA[Epstein survivors have called out Todd Blanche and the DOJ for what they view as a grotesque inversion of priorities: the department has had time to sit down with Ghislaine Maxwell, manage her interview, release transcripts, defend its redaction process, and insist the Epstein files review is essentially over — yet survivors say they have been left begging for basic access, answers, and a direct meeting. Blanche told senators he had met with survivors and their lawyers, but a group of survivors publicly disputed that, saying he “has not met with any of us” and that their earlier request to meet with former Attorney General Pam Bondi and DOJ officials went nowhere. Their anger is not just procedural. They argue that the DOJ keeps asking victims to come forward while refusing to fully reckon with the credible allegations survivors have already reported, many of them repeatedly, over years.<br /><br />Their larger accusation is that the DOJ has mishandled both the records and the moral center of the case. Survivors blasted the file releases for exposing survivor names or identifying details in some places while, in their view, continuing to shield alleged abusers, enablers, and powerful associates behind redactions or secrecy. They demanded that DOJ meet directly with survivors and counsel, explain how the redaction and withholding failures happened, and provide clear answers about what records remain unreleased. Annie Farmer was especially direct, calling Blanche’s suggestion that survivors should contact DOJ to re-report crimes “beyond insulting,” because many survivors have already done exactly that. The message from survivors is blunt: the burden should not be on them to keep forcing the government to care; the burden is on DOJ to investigate the alleged network, protect survivor privacy, and account for years of institutional failure.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/todd-blanche-ghislaine-maxwell-epstein-survivors-b2983290.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Rep rips Trump’s DOJ for ‘taking good care of Ghislaine Maxwell’ while ignoring Epstein victims | The Independent</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72183612</guid><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 12:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72183612/survivorscalloutblanche.mp3" length="12260876" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/126cd282-1487-44ef-a065-e924be3e8415/126cd282-1487-44ef-a065-e924be3e8415.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/126cd282-1487-44ef-a065-e924be3e8415/126cd282-1487-44ef-a065-e924be3e8415.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/126cd282-1487-44ef-a065-e924be3e8415/126cd282-1487-44ef-a065-e924be3e8415.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Epstein survivors have called out Todd Blanche and the DOJ for what they view as a grotesque inversion of priorities: the department has had time to sit down with Ghislaine Maxwell, manage her interview, release transcripts, defend its redaction...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Epstein survivors have called out Todd Blanche and the DOJ for what they view as a grotesque inversion of priorities: the department has had time to sit down with Ghislaine Maxwell, manage her interview, release transcripts, defend its redaction process, and insist the Epstein files review is essentially over — yet survivors say they have been left begging for basic access, answers, and a direct meeting. Blanche told senators he had met with survivors and their lawyers, but a group of survivors publicly disputed that, saying he “has not met with any of us” and that their earlier request to meet with former Attorney General Pam Bondi and DOJ officials went nowhere. Their anger is not just procedural. They argue that the DOJ keeps asking victims to come forward while refusing to fully reckon with the credible allegations survivors have already reported, many of them repeatedly, over years.<br /><br />Their larger accusation is that the DOJ has mishandled both the records and the moral center of the case. Survivors blasted the file releases for exposing survivor names or identifying details in some places while, in their view, continuing to shield alleged abusers, enablers, and powerful associates behind redactions or secrecy. They demanded that DOJ meet directly with survivors and counsel, explain how the redaction and withholding failures happened, and provide clear answers about what records remain unreleased. Annie Farmer was especially direct, calling Blanche’s suggestion that survivors should contact DOJ to re-report crimes “beyond insulting,” because many survivors have already done exactly that. The message from survivors is blunt: the burden should not be on them to keep forcing the government to care; the burden is on DOJ to investigate the alleged network, protect survivor privacy, and account for years of institutional failure.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/todd-blanche-ghislaine-maxwell-epstein-survivors-b2983290.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Rep rips Trump’s DOJ for ‘taking good care of Ghislaine Maxwell’ while ignoring Epstein victims | The Independent</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>767</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Mark Middelton And Jeffrey Epstein's Passport To The Clinton White House (5/27/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-mark-middelton-and-jeffrey-epstein-s-passport-to-the-clinton-white-house-5-27-26--72171404</link><description><![CDATA[<br /><br /><br />Mark Middleton was a former special assistant to President Bill Clinton and a longtime Arkansas businessman whose name resurfaced repeatedly in connection with Jeffrey Epstein because of his role in helping facilitate access between Epstein and powerful political circles during the 1990s. Middleton worked in the Clinton White House during the administration’s early years and later became the subject of scrutiny after visitor logs showed he helped arrange multiple White House visits for Epstein. One of the most discussed details was Middleton’s role in introducing Epstein to senior administration officials and influential figures tied to science, finance, and politics. Epstein, who at the time was cultivating an image as a wealthy financier and philanthropist, used relationships like these to deepen his legitimacy and expand his social network among elite institutions. Middleton’s connections to both Arkansas political circles and national Democratic fundraising networks made him a valuable bridge for Epstein as he sought influence far beyond Wall Street and Palm Beach.<br /><br /><br />Interest in Middleton intensified years later after renewed public scrutiny of the Clinton-Epstein relationship and the release of White House visitor records showing Epstein visited the White House multiple times during the Clinton years. Middleton himself largely avoided public discussion of the matter and denied wrongdoing, but his role continued to attract attention because he appeared to have been one of the earliest high-level political gatekeepers to help Epstein move comfortably inside elite Washington circles. Questions surrounding Middleton became even more pronounced after his 2022 death, which authorities ruled a suicide, though the circumstances quickly fueled speculation online due to the already heightened public obsession surrounding Epstein’s network and political associations. While there has never been evidence that Middleton was accused of participating in Epstein’s criminal conduct, his documented role in helping connect Epstein to powerful institutions and influential individuals has kept his name firmly embedded in discussions about how Epstein gained access to some of the most powerful people in America.<br /><br /><br /><br />to ocntact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72171404</guid><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72171404/megamarkmiddletondeath.mp3" length="53716606" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0fcbd3b2-add3-427f-a681-dcf926385c0b/0fcbd3b2-add3-427f-a681-dcf926385c0b.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0fcbd3b2-add3-427f-a681-dcf926385c0b/0fcbd3b2-add3-427f-a681-dcf926385c0b.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0fcbd3b2-add3-427f-a681-dcf926385c0b/0fcbd3b2-add3-427f-a681-dcf926385c0b.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Mark Middleton was a former special assistant to President Bill Clinton and a longtime Arkansas businessman whose name resurfaced repeatedly in connection with Jeffrey Epstein because of his role in helping facilitate access between Epstein and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br /><br /><br />Mark Middleton was a former special assistant to President Bill Clinton and a longtime Arkansas businessman whose name resurfaced repeatedly in connection with Jeffrey Epstein because of his role in helping facilitate access between Epstein and powerful political circles during the 1990s. Middleton worked in the Clinton White House during the administration’s early years and later became the subject of scrutiny after visitor logs showed he helped arrange multiple White House visits for Epstein. One of the most discussed details was Middleton’s role in introducing Epstein to senior administration officials and influential figures tied to science, finance, and politics. Epstein, who at the time was cultivating an image as a wealthy financier and philanthropist, used relationships like these to deepen his legitimacy and expand his social network among elite institutions. Middleton’s connections to both Arkansas political circles and national Democratic fundraising networks made him a valuable bridge for Epstein as he sought influence far beyond Wall Street and Palm Beach.<br /><br /><br />Interest in Middleton intensified years later after renewed public scrutiny of the Clinton-Epstein relationship and the release of White House visitor records showing Epstein visited the White House multiple times during the Clinton years. Middleton himself largely avoided public discussion of the matter and denied wrongdoing, but his role continued to attract attention because he appeared to have been one of the earliest high-level political gatekeepers to help Epstein move comfortably inside elite Washington circles. Questions surrounding Middleton became even more pronounced after his 2022 death, which authorities ruled a suicide, though the circumstances quickly fueled speculation online due to the already heightened public obsession surrounding Epstein’s network and political associations. While there has never been evidence that Middleton was accused of participating in Epstein’s criminal conduct, his documented role in helping connect Epstein to powerful institutions and influential individuals has kept his name firmly embedded in discussions about how Epstein gained access to some of the most powerful people in America.<br /><br /><br /><br />to ocntact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3358</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>billgates,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epstein,epsteinisland,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,ghislainemaxwellupdates,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinnews,jeffreyepsteinnewsupdates,maxwellnewsupdates,news,newsupdate,princeandrew,princeandrewnews,theyallknew,truecrime,truecrimenewsreport</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition: The Sarah Ransome Deposition From The Maxwell/Virginia Roberts Lawsuit (Part 17-18) (5/26/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-sarah-ransome-deposition-from-the-maxwell-virginia-roberts-lawsuit-part-17-18-5-26-26--72171344</link><description><![CDATA[Sarah Ransome’s deposition offers a disturbing account of her exploitation by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. She described being lured to New York under false pretenses and quickly forced into a world of manipulation and abuse. Ransome testified to being coerced into group sexual acts, including one incident involving a well-known attorney. She recounted life on Epstein’s private island and inside his New York mansion as being tightly controlled and openly sexual, where young women were “lent out” to powerful men and Maxwell ran the properties like a brothel. She spoke of being subjected to weight demands, emotionally broken down, and even attempting to escape by swimming away—only to be caught and returned.<br /><br /><br />Ransome also claimed Epstein kept extensive flight logs, took photos and videos of sexual encounters, and may have used them as leverage over high-profile associates. However, her credibility was later challenged after she sent emails alleging the existence of sex tapes involving major political and business figures—claims she later admitted were fabricated in a desperate attempt to draw attention to her situation. She expressed remorse for those statements and acknowledged that they were false. Still, her deposition remains one of the most revealing inside views of how Epstein’s trafficking operation functioned—highlighting both the calculated cruelty of the system and the lasting psychological toll it inflicted on its victims.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23453527-de-701-1-sarah-ransome-depo" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">DE 701-1 — Sarah Ransome depo - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72171344</guid><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 08:25:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72171344/megaransomedepo17n18.mp3" length="36966862" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2654e270-0e25-428b-9921-2e2be27a6999/2654e270-0e25-428b-9921-2e2be27a6999.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2654e270-0e25-428b-9921-2e2be27a6999/2654e270-0e25-428b-9921-2e2be27a6999.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/2654e270-0e25-428b-9921-2e2be27a6999/2654e270-0e25-428b-9921-2e2be27a6999.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Sarah Ransome’s deposition offers a disturbing account of her exploitation by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. She described being lured to New York under false pretenses and quickly forced into a world of manipulation and abuse. Ransome...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Sarah Ransome’s deposition offers a disturbing account of her exploitation by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. She described being lured to New York under false pretenses and quickly forced into a world of manipulation and abuse. Ransome testified to being coerced into group sexual acts, including one incident involving a well-known attorney. She recounted life on Epstein’s private island and inside his New York mansion as being tightly controlled and openly sexual, where young women were “lent out” to powerful men and Maxwell ran the properties like a brothel. She spoke of being subjected to weight demands, emotionally broken down, and even attempting to escape by swimming away—only to be caught and returned.<br /><br /><br />Ransome also claimed Epstein kept extensive flight logs, took photos and videos of sexual encounters, and may have used them as leverage over high-profile associates. However, her credibility was later challenged after she sent emails alleging the existence of sex tapes involving major political and business figures—claims she later admitted were fabricated in a desperate attempt to draw attention to her situation. She expressed remorse for those statements and acknowledged that they were false. Still, her deposition remains one of the most revealing inside views of how Epstein’s trafficking operation functioned—highlighting both the calculated cruelty of the system and the lasting psychological toll it inflicted on its victims.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23453527-de-701-1-sarah-ransome-depo" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">DE 701-1 — Sarah Ransome depo - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2311</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>billgates,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epstein,epsteinisland,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,ghislainemaxwellupdates,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinnews,jeffreyepsteinnewsupdates,maxwellnewsupdates,news,newsupdate,princeandrew,princeandrewnews,theyallknew,truecrime,truecrimenewsreport</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition: The Sarah Ransome Deposition From The Maxwell/Virginia Roberts Lawsuit (Part 14-16) (5/26/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-sarah-ransome-deposition-from-the-maxwell-virginia-roberts-lawsuit-part-14-16-5-26-26--72171343</link><description><![CDATA[Sarah Ransome’s deposition offers a disturbing account of her exploitation by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. She described being lured to New York under false pretenses and quickly forced into a world of manipulation and abuse. Ransome testified to being coerced into group sexual acts, including one incident involving a well-known attorney. She recounted life on Epstein’s private island and inside his New York mansion as being tightly controlled and openly sexual, where young women were “lent out” to powerful men and Maxwell ran the properties like a brothel. She spoke of being subjected to weight demands, emotionally broken down, and even attempting to escape by swimming away—only to be caught and returned.<br /><br /><br />Ransome also claimed Epstein kept extensive flight logs, took photos and videos of sexual encounters, and may have used them as leverage over high-profile associates. However, her credibility was later challenged after she sent emails alleging the existence of sex tapes involving major political and business figures—claims she later admitted were fabricated in a desperate attempt to draw attention to her situation. She expressed remorse for those statements and acknowledged that they were false. Still, her deposition remains one of the most revealing inside views of how Epstein’s trafficking operation functioned—highlighting both the calculated cruelty of the system and the lasting psychological toll it inflicted on its victims.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23453527-de-701-1-sarah-ransome-depo" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">DE 701-1 — Sarah Ransome depo - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72171343</guid><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 06:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72171343/megaransome14n15n16.mp3" length="51663142" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cc5b19a5-703a-4a85-b00f-ba8bbbc4f921/cc5b19a5-703a-4a85-b00f-ba8bbbc4f921.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cc5b19a5-703a-4a85-b00f-ba8bbbc4f921/cc5b19a5-703a-4a85-b00f-ba8bbbc4f921.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/cc5b19a5-703a-4a85-b00f-ba8bbbc4f921/cc5b19a5-703a-4a85-b00f-ba8bbbc4f921.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Sarah Ransome’s deposition offers a disturbing account of her exploitation by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. She described being lured to New York under false pretenses and quickly forced into a world of manipulation and abuse. Ransome...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Sarah Ransome’s deposition offers a disturbing account of her exploitation by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. She described being lured to New York under false pretenses and quickly forced into a world of manipulation and abuse. Ransome testified to being coerced into group sexual acts, including one incident involving a well-known attorney. She recounted life on Epstein’s private island and inside his New York mansion as being tightly controlled and openly sexual, where young women were “lent out” to powerful men and Maxwell ran the properties like a brothel. She spoke of being subjected to weight demands, emotionally broken down, and even attempting to escape by swimming away—only to be caught and returned.<br /><br /><br />Ransome also claimed Epstein kept extensive flight logs, took photos and videos of sexual encounters, and may have used them as leverage over high-profile associates. However, her credibility was later challenged after she sent emails alleging the existence of sex tapes involving major political and business figures—claims she later admitted were fabricated in a desperate attempt to draw attention to her situation. She expressed remorse for those statements and acknowledged that they were false. Still, her deposition remains one of the most revealing inside views of how Epstein’s trafficking operation functioned—highlighting both the calculated cruelty of the system and the lasting psychological toll it inflicted on its victims.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23453527-de-701-1-sarah-ransome-depo" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">DE 701-1 — Sarah Ransome depo - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3229</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>billgates,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epstein,epsteinisland,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,ghislainemaxwellupdates,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinnews,jeffreyepsteinnewsupdates,maxwellnewsupdates,news,newsupdate,princeandrew,princeandrewnews,theyallknew,truecrime,truecrimenewsreport</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The SNL Cold Open That Featured 'Epstein'</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-snl-cold-open-that-featured-epstein--72058162</link><description><![CDATA[In the sketch, Adam Driver appears as Jeffrey Epstein in Hell, sharing space with other controversial public figures—one being Alan Dershowitz (played by Jon Lovitz). The setup is absurd and dark: Dershowitz is preparing his impeachment defense when he ends up transported to Hell, where he is greeted by Epstein, who greets everything with an unnerving nonchalance, saying he’s “just hanging” in Hell, a grim reference to Epstein’s death by suicide in prison. The sketch mingles satire with shock, using the ludicrous setting to comment on how scandal, power, denial, and guilt function in public life<br /><br /><br />The cold open also includes other figures in Hell—Mitch McConnell, Flo from Progressive, the “Baby Shark” songwriter, etc.—turning the scene into a weirdly populated waiting room of immoral celebrity and public scandal. There are jokes about conspiracy theories around Epstein’s death, with Epstein quipping “I wish you could have been there in person” after Dershowitz complains about missing something, and Epstein responding “Yeah, it’s too bad I was murdered.” The tone is uncomfortable comedy: it forces laughter but also forces audience to think about the real grotesque elements of the Epstein scandal—death, power, impunity.<br /><br /><br />To contact me:<br /><br />Bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br />https://www.google.com/amp/s/nypost.com/2020/01/26/snl-cold-open-alan-dershowitz-reunites-with-just-hanging-jeffrey-epstein-in-hell/amp/<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72058162</guid><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 04:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72058162/snlepsteindriver.mp3" length="9364419" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b831e9be-1781-407b-8513-5ab1dde00073/b831e9be-1781-407b-8513-5ab1dde00073.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b831e9be-1781-407b-8513-5ab1dde00073/b831e9be-1781-407b-8513-5ab1dde00073.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/b831e9be-1781-407b-8513-5ab1dde00073/b831e9be-1781-407b-8513-5ab1dde00073.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In the sketch, Adam Driver appears as Jeffrey Epstein in Hell, sharing space with other controversial public figures—one being Alan Dershowitz (played by Jon Lovitz). The setup is absurd and dark: Dershowitz is preparing his impeachment defense when...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In the sketch, Adam Driver appears as Jeffrey Epstein in Hell, sharing space with other controversial public figures—one being Alan Dershowitz (played by Jon Lovitz). The setup is absurd and dark: Dershowitz is preparing his impeachment defense when he ends up transported to Hell, where he is greeted by Epstein, who greets everything with an unnerving nonchalance, saying he’s “just hanging” in Hell, a grim reference to Epstein’s death by suicide in prison. The sketch mingles satire with shock, using the ludicrous setting to comment on how scandal, power, denial, and guilt function in public life<br /><br /><br />The cold open also includes other figures in Hell—Mitch McConnell, Flo from Progressive, the “Baby Shark” songwriter, etc.—turning the scene into a weirdly populated waiting room of immoral celebrity and public scandal. There are jokes about conspiracy theories around Epstein’s death, with Epstein quipping “I wish you could have been there in person” after Dershowitz complains about missing something, and Epstein responding “Yeah, it’s too bad I was murdered.” The tone is uncomfortable comedy: it forces laughter but also forces audience to think about the real grotesque elements of the Epstein scandal—death, power, impunity.<br /><br /><br />To contact me:<br /><br />Bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br />https://www.google.com/amp/s/nypost.com/2020/01/26/snl-cold-open-alan-dershowitz-reunites-with-just-hanging-jeffrey-epstein-in-hell/amp/<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>586</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>billgates,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epstein,epsteinisland,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,ghislainemaxwellupdates,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinnews,jeffreyepsteinnewsupdates,maxwellnewsupdates,news,newsupdate,princeandrew,princeandrewnews,theyallknew,truecrime,truecrimenewsreport</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Great Betrayal: Trump, Epstein, and the Death of Accountability</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-great-betrayal-trump-epstein-and-the-death-of-accountability--71674972</link><description><![CDATA[The fight for transparency in the Epstein case has reached a breaking point, and it’s become impossible to ignore the role Donald Trump is playing in concealing the truth. Despite campaigning on promises to expose Epstein’s network and deliver justice, Trump has instead publicly dismissed the entire scandal as a “hoax,” undermining survivors and derailing efforts to uncover the truth. His refusal to release the Epstein files—paired with the delusion of his most devoted supporters, who treat him like a messianic figure—has turned political discourse into religious fanaticism. Families have fractured, friendships have collapsed, and critical thinking has evaporated as millions defend Trump not with facts but with blind faith. The cult-like devotion has transformed disappointment into national dysfunction, replacing accountability with worship and truth with propaganda.<br /><br />For the survivors of Epstein’s crimes, Trump’s betrayal is devastating. They were told to trust him, to believe that justice was coming, and instead were publicly humiliated and dismissed by the very man they believed was fighting for them.   His administration promised action but delivered nothing except excuses and obstruction. Meanwhile, Trump supporters continue to deny his documented connections to Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, acting as though he was some undercover hero rather than a participant in the same elite circles. The result has been enormous damage to the pursuit of accountability: a swamp deeper and more toxic than ever, protected by people more interested in defending their idol than defending the truth.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/71674972</guid><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/71674972/magabetrayal.mp3" length="14523707" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9ab27837-166f-45fe-8432-6b50d3c65f98/9ab27837-166f-45fe-8432-6b50d3c65f98.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9ab27837-166f-45fe-8432-6b50d3c65f98/9ab27837-166f-45fe-8432-6b50d3c65f98.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9ab27837-166f-45fe-8432-6b50d3c65f98/9ab27837-166f-45fe-8432-6b50d3c65f98.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The fight for transparency in the Epstein case has reached a breaking point, and it’s become impossible to ignore the role Donald Trump is playing in concealing the truth. Despite campaigning on promises to expose Epstein’s network and deliver...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The fight for transparency in the Epstein case has reached a breaking point, and it’s become impossible to ignore the role Donald Trump is playing in concealing the truth. Despite campaigning on promises to expose Epstein’s network and deliver justice, Trump has instead publicly dismissed the entire scandal as a “hoax,” undermining survivors and derailing efforts to uncover the truth. His refusal to release the Epstein files—paired with the delusion of his most devoted supporters, who treat him like a messianic figure—has turned political discourse into religious fanaticism. Families have fractured, friendships have collapsed, and critical thinking has evaporated as millions defend Trump not with facts but with blind faith. The cult-like devotion has transformed disappointment into national dysfunction, replacing accountability with worship and truth with propaganda.<br /><br />For the survivors of Epstein’s crimes, Trump’s betrayal is devastating. They were told to trust him, to believe that justice was coming, and instead were publicly humiliated and dismissed by the very man they believed was fighting for them.   His administration promised action but delivered nothing except excuses and obstruction. Meanwhile, Trump supporters continue to deny his documented connections to Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, acting as though he was some undercover hero rather than a participant in the same elite circles. The result has been enormous damage to the pursuit of accountability: a swamp deeper and more toxic than ever, protected by people more interested in defending their idol than defending the truth.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>908</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>billgates,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epstein,epsteinisland,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,ghislainemaxwellupdates,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinnews,jeffreyepsteinnewsupdates,maxwellnewsupdates,news,newsupdate,princeandrew,princeandrewnews,theyallknew,truecrime,truecrimenewsreport</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Prince Andrew Prepares For A Brand New Epstein Storm To Come Rolling In</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/prince-andrew-prepares-for-a-brand-new-epstein-storm-to-come-rolling-in--72058158</link><description><![CDATA[A memoir titled Nobody’s Girl: A Memoir of Surviving Abuse and Fighting for Justice, written by Virginia Roberts Giuffre with journalist Amy Wallace, is scheduled for posthumous release on October 21, 2025, from Alfred A. Knopf (with Penguin Random House involved in audio and ebook editions). The 400‑page manuscript was completed prior to Giuffre’s death by suicide in April 2025, and she had conveyed—via an email to Wallace dated April 1—that it was her “heartfelt wish” for the book to be published regardless of the outcome. Publishers describe the memoir as an unsparing and powerful narrative of trafficking, abuse, and survival, rigorously fact-checked and legally vetted, aimed at spotlighting systemic failures in human trafficking enforcement and championing justice and awareness.<br /><br /><br />Of particular note, Nobody’s Girl includes “intimate, disturbing, and heartbreaking new details” about Giuffre’s experiences with Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and other high-profile individuals—including Britain's Prince Andrew. This marks her first public discussion of Andrew since their 2022 out-of-court settlement, which reportedly involved a multi-million‑dollar payment. In doing so, the memoir is expected to reignite scrutiny and media attention on the allegations Andrew has long denied, resurrecting his central role in a scandal many believed had faded from the headlines.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/prince-andrew-faces-all-time-low-virginia-giuffre-haunts-royal-grave-expert" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Prince Andrew struggling as Virginia Giuffre memoir set for release: expert | Fox News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72058158</guid><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 00:30:01 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72058158/andrewpreparesbrandnewstorm.mp3" length="16794062" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3ec25f90-5a2d-4ac7-bd61-a6afdfe44ed4/3ec25f90-5a2d-4ac7-bd61-a6afdfe44ed4.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3ec25f90-5a2d-4ac7-bd61-a6afdfe44ed4/3ec25f90-5a2d-4ac7-bd61-a6afdfe44ed4.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3ec25f90-5a2d-4ac7-bd61-a6afdfe44ed4/3ec25f90-5a2d-4ac7-bd61-a6afdfe44ed4.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A memoir titled Nobody’s Girl: A Memoir of Surviving Abuse and Fighting for Justice, written by Virginia Roberts Giuffre with journalist Amy Wallace, is scheduled for posthumous release on October 21, 2025, from Alfred A. Knopf (with Penguin Random...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A memoir titled Nobody’s Girl: A Memoir of Surviving Abuse and Fighting for Justice, written by Virginia Roberts Giuffre with journalist Amy Wallace, is scheduled for posthumous release on October 21, 2025, from Alfred A. Knopf (with Penguin Random House involved in audio and ebook editions). The 400‑page manuscript was completed prior to Giuffre’s death by suicide in April 2025, and she had conveyed—via an email to Wallace dated April 1—that it was her “heartfelt wish” for the book to be published regardless of the outcome. Publishers describe the memoir as an unsparing and powerful narrative of trafficking, abuse, and survival, rigorously fact-checked and legally vetted, aimed at spotlighting systemic failures in human trafficking enforcement and championing justice and awareness.<br /><br /><br />Of particular note, Nobody’s Girl includes “intimate, disturbing, and heartbreaking new details” about Giuffre’s experiences with Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and other high-profile individuals—including Britain's Prince Andrew. This marks her first public discussion of Andrew since their 2022 out-of-court settlement, which reportedly involved a multi-million‑dollar payment. In doing so, the memoir is expected to reignite scrutiny and media attention on the allegations Andrew has long denied, resurrecting his central role in a scandal many believed had faded from the headlines.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/prince-andrew-faces-all-time-low-virginia-giuffre-haunts-royal-grave-expert" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Prince Andrew struggling as Virginia Giuffre memoir set for release: expert | Fox News</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1050</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>billgates,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epstein,epsteinisland,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,ghislainemaxwellupdates,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinnews,jeffreyepsteinnewsupdates,maxwellnewsupdates,news,newsupdate,princeandrew,princeandrewnews,theyallknew,truecrime,truecrimenewsreport</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>DOJ Releases Epstein File Containing FBI 302 Referencing Trump Allegation</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/doj-releases-epstein-file-containing-fbi-302-referencing-trump-allegation--72171327</link><description><![CDATA[The U.S. Department of Justice recently released several FBI interview summaries that had previously been missing from the massive archive of documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. The records stem from interviews conducted in 2019 with a woman who told federal agents that Epstein had sexually abused her as a teenager in the 1980s. During those interviews, the woman also alleged that Donald Trump attempted to sexually assault her after Epstein introduced them when she was between roughly 13 and 15 years old. Trump has denied the allegations, and the White House dismissed them as baseless and politically motivated<br /><br />The documents had not appeared in the earlier public release of Epstein-related files, which raised questions about whether key materials had been omitted from the Justice Department’s database. Officials later said the FBI interview reports were mistakenly labeled as duplicate records during the document review process, preventing them from being posted initially. The controversy comes amid broader scrutiny of the government’s handling of the Epstein files, as lawmakers from both parties continue to question why some witness interviews and other materials were missing from the initial release required under the Epstein Files Transparency Act.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.cnn.com/2026/03/05/politics/justice-department-fbi-interview-related-trump-abuse-allegation-and-other-missing-epstein-files" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein files: Justice Department posts FBI interview memos related to Trump sex abuse allegation | CNN Politics</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72171327</guid><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 22:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72171327/doj302.mp3" length="19935861" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c5ce5195-9c6a-4727-b206-a4f8892e2461/c5ce5195-9c6a-4727-b206-a4f8892e2461.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c5ce5195-9c6a-4727-b206-a4f8892e2461/c5ce5195-9c6a-4727-b206-a4f8892e2461.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c5ce5195-9c6a-4727-b206-a4f8892e2461/c5ce5195-9c6a-4727-b206-a4f8892e2461.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The U.S. Department of Justice recently released several FBI interview summaries that had previously been missing from the massive archive of documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. The records stem from interviews conducted in 2019...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The U.S. Department of Justice recently released several FBI interview summaries that had previously been missing from the massive archive of documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. The records stem from interviews conducted in 2019 with a woman who told federal agents that Epstein had sexually abused her as a teenager in the 1980s. During those interviews, the woman also alleged that Donald Trump attempted to sexually assault her after Epstein introduced them when she was between roughly 13 and 15 years old. Trump has denied the allegations, and the White House dismissed them as baseless and politically motivated<br /><br />The documents had not appeared in the earlier public release of Epstein-related files, which raised questions about whether key materials had been omitted from the Justice Department’s database. Officials later said the FBI interview reports were mistakenly labeled as duplicate records during the document review process, preventing them from being posted initially. The controversy comes amid broader scrutiny of the government’s handling of the Epstein files, as lawmakers from both parties continue to question why some witness interviews and other materials were missing from the initial release required under the Epstein Files Transparency Act.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.cnn.com/2026/03/05/politics/justice-department-fbi-interview-related-trump-abuse-allegation-and-other-missing-epstein-files" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein files: Justice Department posts FBI interview memos related to Trump sex abuse allegation | CNN Politics</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1246</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>billgates,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epstein,epsteinisland,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,ghislainemaxwellupdates,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinnews,jeffreyepsteinnewsupdates,maxwellnewsupdates,news,newsupdate,princeandrew,princeandrewnews,theyallknew,truecrime,truecrimenewsreport</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Psychology Department At The MCC And Their Narrative About Epstein's Demise (Part 3) (5/26/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-psychology-department-at-the-mcc-and-their-narrative-about-epstein-s-demise-part-3-5-26-26--72167452</link><description><![CDATA[This is a Bureau of Prisons psychological reconstruction of Jeffrey Epstein’s death at MCC New York, prepared after his August 10, 2019 death. It lays out Epstein’s background, legal history, institutional history, medical and mental-health contacts, and the circumstances leading up to his death. The reconstruction notes that its own review was badly limited from the start: formal interviews were not conducted at DOJ direction, and the original video had been confiscated by the FBI before the reconstruction began, meaning investigators could not fully verify timelines, test witness accounts, or compare competing versions of what happened. It also walks through Epstein’s July 2019 arrest, his placement in SHU, the July 23 incident where he was found with material around his neck, his brief placement on suicide watch, his removal to psychological observation, the warning paperwork from the Marshals Service referencing suicidal tendencies, his repeated complaints about sleep and noise, and the major stressors piling up before his death, including bail denial, pending sex-trafficking charges, public disgrace, and the August 9 unsealing of roughly 2,000 pages of damaging material.<br /><br />The most important part is how many so called "institutional failures" the reconstruction identifies. Epstein was supposed to have an appropriate cellmate after coming off observation, but on the night he died he was left alone because his cellmate did not return from court, even though staff knew that hours earlier. The document says the required 30-minute rounds were documented as completed, but Tova Noel and Michael Thomas later stated they did not complete proper rounds at 3:00 a.m. or 5:00 a.m. The reconstruction also flags incomplete and inaccurate paperwork, missing signatures, inconsistent suicide-watch records, unexplained phone calls, failures to maintain direct observation, confusion in housing records, unsecured attorney log books, and a lack of psychological input in cellmate decisions. Its bottom line is not just that Epstein had suicide risk factors; it is that MCC New York’s systems for monitoring, documenting, communicating, and managing those risks were chaotic, inconsistent, and in several key places flatly unreliable.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00105651.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00105651.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72167452</guid><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72167452/epsteinpsychologicalreport3.mp3" length="15247613" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c0313a20-8847-4b5b-badc-b2324df51342/c0313a20-8847-4b5b-badc-b2324df51342.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c0313a20-8847-4b5b-badc-b2324df51342/c0313a20-8847-4b5b-badc-b2324df51342.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/c0313a20-8847-4b5b-badc-b2324df51342/c0313a20-8847-4b5b-badc-b2324df51342.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>This is a Bureau of Prisons psychological reconstruction of Jeffrey Epstein’s death at MCC New York, prepared after his August 10, 2019 death. It lays out Epstein’s background, legal history, institutional history, medical and mental-health contacts,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[This is a Bureau of Prisons psychological reconstruction of Jeffrey Epstein’s death at MCC New York, prepared after his August 10, 2019 death. It lays out Epstein’s background, legal history, institutional history, medical and mental-health contacts, and the circumstances leading up to his death. The reconstruction notes that its own review was badly limited from the start: formal interviews were not conducted at DOJ direction, and the original video had been confiscated by the FBI before the reconstruction began, meaning investigators could not fully verify timelines, test witness accounts, or compare competing versions of what happened. It also walks through Epstein’s July 2019 arrest, his placement in SHU, the July 23 incident where he was found with material around his neck, his brief placement on suicide watch, his removal to psychological observation, the warning paperwork from the Marshals Service referencing suicidal tendencies, his repeated complaints about sleep and noise, and the major stressors piling up before his death, including bail denial, pending sex-trafficking charges, public disgrace, and the August 9 unsealing of roughly 2,000 pages of damaging material.<br /><br />The most important part is how many so called "institutional failures" the reconstruction identifies. Epstein was supposed to have an appropriate cellmate after coming off observation, but on the night he died he was left alone because his cellmate did not return from court, even though staff knew that hours earlier. The document says the required 30-minute rounds were documented as completed, but Tova Noel and Michael Thomas later stated they did not complete proper rounds at 3:00 a.m. or 5:00 a.m. The reconstruction also flags incomplete and inaccurate paperwork, missing signatures, inconsistent suicide-watch records, unexplained phone calls, failures to maintain direct observation, confusion in housing records, unsecured attorney log books, and a lack of psychological input in cellmate decisions. Its bottom line is not just that Epstein had suicide risk factors; it is that MCC New York’s systems for monitoring, documenting, communicating, and managing those risks were chaotic, inconsistent, and in several key places flatly unreliable.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00105651.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00105651.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>953</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>billgates,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epstein,epsteinisland,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,ghislainemaxwellupdates,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinnews,jeffreyepsteinnewsupdates,maxwellnewsupdates,news,newsupdate,princeandrew,princeandrewnews,theyallknew,truecrime,truecrimenewsreport</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Psychology Department At The MCC And Their Narrative About Epstein's Demise (Part 2) (5/26/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-psychology-department-at-the-mcc-and-their-narrative-about-epstein-s-demise-part-2-5-26-26--72167453</link><description><![CDATA[This is a Bureau of Prisons psychological reconstruction of Jeffrey Epstein’s death at MCC New York, prepared after his August 10, 2019 death. It lays out Epstein’s background, legal history, institutional history, medical and mental-health contacts, and the circumstances leading up to his death. The reconstruction notes that its own review was badly limited from the start: formal interviews were not conducted at DOJ direction, and the original video had been confiscated by the FBI before the reconstruction began, meaning investigators could not fully verify timelines, test witness accounts, or compare competing versions of what happened. It also walks through Epstein’s July 2019 arrest, his placement in SHU, the July 23 incident where he was found with material around his neck, his brief placement on suicide watch, his removal to psychological observation, the warning paperwork from the Marshals Service referencing suicidal tendencies, his repeated complaints about sleep and noise, and the major stressors piling up before his death, including bail denial, pending sex-trafficking charges, public disgrace, and the August 9 unsealing of roughly 2,000 pages of damaging material.<br /><br />The most important part is how many so called "institutional failures" the reconstruction identifies. Epstein was supposed to have an appropriate cellmate after coming off observation, but on the night he died he was left alone because his cellmate did not return from court, even though staff knew that hours earlier. The document says the required 30-minute rounds were documented as completed, but Tova Noel and Michael Thomas later stated they did not complete proper rounds at 3:00 a.m. or 5:00 a.m. The reconstruction also flags incomplete and inaccurate paperwork, missing signatures, inconsistent suicide-watch records, unexplained phone calls, failures to maintain direct observation, confusion in housing records, unsecured attorney log books, and a lack of psychological input in cellmate decisions. Its bottom line is not just that Epstein had suicide risk factors; it is that MCC New York’s systems for monitoring, documenting, communicating, and managing those risks were chaotic, inconsistent, and in several key places flatly unreliable.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00105651.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00105651.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72167453</guid><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 18:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72167453/epsteinpsychologicalreport2.mp3" length="15686470" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/81aca9bd-7197-4d3b-b066-94eeece09c78/81aca9bd-7197-4d3b-b066-94eeece09c78.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/81aca9bd-7197-4d3b-b066-94eeece09c78/81aca9bd-7197-4d3b-b066-94eeece09c78.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/81aca9bd-7197-4d3b-b066-94eeece09c78/81aca9bd-7197-4d3b-b066-94eeece09c78.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>This is a Bureau of Prisons psychological reconstruction of Jeffrey Epstein’s death at MCC New York, prepared after his August 10, 2019 death. It lays out Epstein’s background, legal history, institutional history, medical and mental-health contacts,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[This is a Bureau of Prisons psychological reconstruction of Jeffrey Epstein’s death at MCC New York, prepared after his August 10, 2019 death. It lays out Epstein’s background, legal history, institutional history, medical and mental-health contacts, and the circumstances leading up to his death. The reconstruction notes that its own review was badly limited from the start: formal interviews were not conducted at DOJ direction, and the original video had been confiscated by the FBI before the reconstruction began, meaning investigators could not fully verify timelines, test witness accounts, or compare competing versions of what happened. It also walks through Epstein’s July 2019 arrest, his placement in SHU, the July 23 incident where he was found with material around his neck, his brief placement on suicide watch, his removal to psychological observation, the warning paperwork from the Marshals Service referencing suicidal tendencies, his repeated complaints about sleep and noise, and the major stressors piling up before his death, including bail denial, pending sex-trafficking charges, public disgrace, and the August 9 unsealing of roughly 2,000 pages of damaging material.<br /><br />The most important part is how many so called "institutional failures" the reconstruction identifies. Epstein was supposed to have an appropriate cellmate after coming off observation, but on the night he died he was left alone because his cellmate did not return from court, even though staff knew that hours earlier. The document says the required 30-minute rounds were documented as completed, but Tova Noel and Michael Thomas later stated they did not complete proper rounds at 3:00 a.m. or 5:00 a.m. The reconstruction also flags incomplete and inaccurate paperwork, missing signatures, inconsistent suicide-watch records, unexplained phone calls, failures to maintain direct observation, confusion in housing records, unsecured attorney log books, and a lack of psychological input in cellmate decisions. Its bottom line is not just that Epstein had suicide risk factors; it is that MCC New York’s systems for monitoring, documenting, communicating, and managing those risks were chaotic, inconsistent, and in several key places flatly unreliable.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00105651.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00105651.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>981</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>billgates,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epstein,epsteinisland,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,ghislainemaxwellupdates,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinnews,jeffreyepsteinnewsupdates,maxwellnewsupdates,news,newsupdate,princeandrew,princeandrewnews,theyallknew,truecrime,truecrimenewsreport</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Psychology Department At The MCC And Their Narrative About Epstein's Demise (Part 1) (5/26/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-psychology-department-at-the-mcc-and-their-narrative-about-epstein-s-demise-part-1-5-26-26--72167454</link><description><![CDATA[This is a Bureau of Prisons psychological reconstruction of Jeffrey Epstein’s death at MCC New York, prepared after his August 10, 2019 death. It lays out Epstein’s background, legal history, institutional history, medical and mental-health contacts, and the circumstances leading up to his death. The reconstruction notes that its own review was badly limited from the start: formal interviews were not conducted at DOJ direction, and the original video had been confiscated by the FBI before the reconstruction began, meaning investigators could not fully verify timelines, test witness accounts, or compare competing versions of what happened. It also walks through Epstein’s July 2019 arrest, his placement in SHU, the July 23 incident where he was found with material around his neck, his brief placement on suicide watch, his removal to psychological observation, the warning paperwork from the Marshals Service referencing suicidal tendencies, his repeated complaints about sleep and noise, and the major stressors piling up before his death, including bail denial, pending sex-trafficking charges, public disgrace, and the August 9 unsealing of roughly 2,000 pages of damaging material.<br /><br />The most important part is how many so called "institutional failures" the reconstruction identifies. Epstein was supposed to have an appropriate cellmate after coming off observation, but on the night he died he was left alone because his cellmate did not return from court, even though staff knew that hours earlier. The document says the required 30-minute rounds were documented as completed, but Tova Noel and Michael Thomas later stated they did not complete proper rounds at 3:00 a.m. or 5:00 a.m. The reconstruction also flags incomplete and inaccurate paperwork, missing signatures, inconsistent suicide-watch records, unexplained phone calls, failures to maintain direct observation, confusion in housing records, unsecured attorney log books, and a lack of psychological input in cellmate decisions. Its bottom line is not just that Epstein had suicide risk factors; it is that MCC New York’s systems for monitoring, documenting, communicating, and managing those risks were chaotic, inconsistent, and in several key places flatly unreliable.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00105651.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00105651.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72167454</guid><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72167454/epsteinpyschologicalreport1.mp3" length="14291740" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/264d3107-5c7e-49e4-9f54-b84b22a40d04/264d3107-5c7e-49e4-9f54-b84b22a40d04.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/264d3107-5c7e-49e4-9f54-b84b22a40d04/264d3107-5c7e-49e4-9f54-b84b22a40d04.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/264d3107-5c7e-49e4-9f54-b84b22a40d04/264d3107-5c7e-49e4-9f54-b84b22a40d04.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>This is a Bureau of Prisons psychological reconstruction of Jeffrey Epstein’s death at MCC New York, prepared after his August 10, 2019 death. It lays out Epstein’s background, legal history, institutional history, medical and mental-health contacts,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[This is a Bureau of Prisons psychological reconstruction of Jeffrey Epstein’s death at MCC New York, prepared after his August 10, 2019 death. It lays out Epstein’s background, legal history, institutional history, medical and mental-health contacts, and the circumstances leading up to his death. The reconstruction notes that its own review was badly limited from the start: formal interviews were not conducted at DOJ direction, and the original video had been confiscated by the FBI before the reconstruction began, meaning investigators could not fully verify timelines, test witness accounts, or compare competing versions of what happened. It also walks through Epstein’s July 2019 arrest, his placement in SHU, the July 23 incident where he was found with material around his neck, his brief placement on suicide watch, his removal to psychological observation, the warning paperwork from the Marshals Service referencing suicidal tendencies, his repeated complaints about sleep and noise, and the major stressors piling up before his death, including bail denial, pending sex-trafficking charges, public disgrace, and the August 9 unsealing of roughly 2,000 pages of damaging material.<br /><br />The most important part is how many so called "institutional failures" the reconstruction identifies. Epstein was supposed to have an appropriate cellmate after coming off observation, but on the night he died he was left alone because his cellmate did not return from court, even though staff knew that hours earlier. The document says the required 30-minute rounds were documented as completed, but Tova Noel and Michael Thomas later stated they did not complete proper rounds at 3:00 a.m. or 5:00 a.m. The reconstruction also flags incomplete and inaccurate paperwork, missing signatures, inconsistent suicide-watch records, unexplained phone calls, failures to maintain direct observation, confusion in housing records, unsecured attorney log books, and a lack of psychological input in cellmate decisions. Its bottom line is not just that Epstein had suicide risk factors; it is that MCC New York’s systems for monitoring, documenting, communicating, and managing those risks were chaotic, inconsistent, and in several key places flatly unreliable.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00105651.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00105651.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>894</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>billgates,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epstein,epsteinisland,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,ghislainemaxwellupdates,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinnews,jeffreyepsteinnewsupdates,maxwellnewsupdates,news,newsupdate,princeandrew,princeandrewnews,theyallknew,truecrime,truecrimenewsreport</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Judge Throws Out Michael Wolff’s Preemptive Lawsuit Against Melania Trump (5/26/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/judge-throws-out-michael-wolff-s-preemptive-lawsuit-against-melania-trump-5-26-26--72167455</link><description><![CDATA[A federal judge dismissed Michael Wolff’s lawsuit against Melania Trump, rejecting his attempt to preemptively block or neutralize a potential $1 billion defamation suit from the first lady over comments tying her to Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ruled that Wolff’s approach was procedurally improper, calling it a “contorted” effort and saying federal courts do not exist to referee a pre-lawsuit battle in that manner. Wolff had argued that Melania Trump’s legal threats were meant to intimidate critics and chill speech, while her lawyer said his statements caused reputational and financial harm and demanded retractions.<br /><br />The underlying dispute centers on Wolff’s comments about Melania Trump, Donald Trump, and Epstein’s social orbit, including remarks that were later used in a Daily Beast story the outlet retracted after legal pressure. Wolff maintains that his statements were either taken out of context, protected opinion, or did not accuse Melania Trump of criminal involvement in Epstein’s crimes. Melania Trump has forcefully denied any association with Epstein and framed the claims as defamatory lies. The judge did not decide whether Wolff defamed her; instead, she dismissed his preemptive lawsuit and left any future defamation fight to proceed through the ordinary legal process.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/judge-dismisses-michael-wolff-lawsuit-first-lady-melania-trump-epstein-rcna346616" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Judge throws out Michael Wolff’s lawsuit against Melania Trump</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72167455</guid><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 14:40:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72167455/wolfftrumplawsuitossed.mp3" length="11044197" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/bb18e6b1-9bd7-4c13-925f-0a8ad6f4097f/bb18e6b1-9bd7-4c13-925f-0a8ad6f4097f.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/bb18e6b1-9bd7-4c13-925f-0a8ad6f4097f/bb18e6b1-9bd7-4c13-925f-0a8ad6f4097f.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/bb18e6b1-9bd7-4c13-925f-0a8ad6f4097f/bb18e6b1-9bd7-4c13-925f-0a8ad6f4097f.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A federal judge dismissed Michael Wolff’s lawsuit against Melania Trump, rejecting his attempt to preemptively block or neutralize a potential $1 billion defamation suit from the first lady over comments tying her to Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Mary Kay...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A federal judge dismissed Michael Wolff’s lawsuit against Melania Trump, rejecting his attempt to preemptively block or neutralize a potential $1 billion defamation suit from the first lady over comments tying her to Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ruled that Wolff’s approach was procedurally improper, calling it a “contorted” effort and saying federal courts do not exist to referee a pre-lawsuit battle in that manner. Wolff had argued that Melania Trump’s legal threats were meant to intimidate critics and chill speech, while her lawyer said his statements caused reputational and financial harm and demanded retractions.<br /><br />The underlying dispute centers on Wolff’s comments about Melania Trump, Donald Trump, and Epstein’s social orbit, including remarks that were later used in a Daily Beast story the outlet retracted after legal pressure. Wolff maintains that his statements were either taken out of context, protected opinion, or did not accuse Melania Trump of criminal involvement in Epstein’s crimes. Melania Trump has forcefully denied any association with Epstein and framed the claims as defamatory lies. The judge did not decide whether Wolff defamed her; instead, she dismissed his preemptive lawsuit and left any future defamation fight to proceed through the ordinary legal process.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/judge-dismisses-michael-wolff-lawsuit-first-lady-melania-trump-epstein-rcna346616" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Judge throws out Michael Wolff’s lawsuit against Melania Trump</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>691</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>British Detectives Want Epstein Files — But Washington Holds the Keys (5/26/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/british-detectives-want-epstein-files-but-washington-holds-the-keys-5-26-26--72167451</link><description><![CDATA[Detectives investigating Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s links to Jeffrey Epstein are reportedly being slowed down by the U.S. Department of Justice, with British investigators still waiting on original Epstein-related documents they believe are necessary before they can make charging decisions. The investigation is said to involve questions about Andrew’s conduct during his years as a U.K. trade envoy, including whether sensitive or confidential material may have been passed to Epstein, as well as broader allegations of sexual misconduct and corruption. The central frustration, according to the reporting, is that British police may not be able to move the case toward a decision on charges until 2027 because key material remains in American hands.<br /><br />The story frames the delay as another example of the Epstein case being trapped inside institutional bottlenecks, where public pressure for answers keeps colliding with slow-moving legal processes, international evidence-sharing, and claims about what can or cannot be released. Andrew denies the allegations, but the investigation appears to have widened beyond one isolated claim and into a broader review of his relationship with Epstein, his official role, and whether that role creates a viable misconduct case under U.K. law. The result is a politically explosive limbo: British detectives are reportedly trying to build a case, but without the underlying DOJ material, they may be stuck waiting while one of the most high-profile Epstein-linked investigations drags into another year.<br /><br /><br />To contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-15842841/Andrew-detectives-Jeffrey-Epstein-frustrated-US-Department-Justice-wont-able-decide-charges-2027.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Andrew detectives probing his links with Jeffrey Epstein are being frustrated by US Department of Justice and won't be able to decide on charges before 2027 | Daily Mail Online</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72167451</guid><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 12:37:33 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72167451/dojwonthelpukepsteininvestigation.mp3" length="14565921" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3da32768-9663-444c-8593-ed4c8d934a0f/3da32768-9663-444c-8593-ed4c8d934a0f.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3da32768-9663-444c-8593-ed4c8d934a0f/3da32768-9663-444c-8593-ed4c8d934a0f.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3da32768-9663-444c-8593-ed4c8d934a0f/3da32768-9663-444c-8593-ed4c8d934a0f.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Detectives investigating Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s links to Jeffrey Epstein are reportedly being slowed down by the U.S. Department of Justice, with British investigators still waiting on original Epstein-related documents they believe are...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Detectives investigating Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s links to Jeffrey Epstein are reportedly being slowed down by the U.S. Department of Justice, with British investigators still waiting on original Epstein-related documents they believe are necessary before they can make charging decisions. The investigation is said to involve questions about Andrew’s conduct during his years as a U.K. trade envoy, including whether sensitive or confidential material may have been passed to Epstein, as well as broader allegations of sexual misconduct and corruption. The central frustration, according to the reporting, is that British police may not be able to move the case toward a decision on charges until 2027 because key material remains in American hands.<br /><br />The story frames the delay as another example of the Epstein case being trapped inside institutional bottlenecks, where public pressure for answers keeps colliding with slow-moving legal processes, international evidence-sharing, and claims about what can or cannot be released. Andrew denies the allegations, but the investigation appears to have widened beyond one isolated claim and into a broader review of his relationship with Epstein, his official role, and whether that role creates a viable misconduct case under U.K. law. The result is a politically explosive limbo: British detectives are reportedly trying to build a case, but without the underlying DOJ material, they may be stuck waiting while one of the most high-profile Epstein-linked investigations drags into another year.<br /><br /><br />To contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-15842841/Andrew-detectives-Jeffrey-Epstein-frustrated-US-Department-Justice-wont-able-decide-charges-2027.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Andrew detectives probing his links with Jeffrey Epstein are being frustrated by US Department of Justice and won't be able to decide on charges before 2027 | Daily Mail Online</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>911</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>billgates,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epstein,epsteinisland,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,ghislainemaxwellupdates,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinnews,jeffreyepsteinnewsupdates,maxwellnewsupdates,news,newsupdate,princeandrew,princeandrewnews,theyallknew,truecrime,truecrimenewsreport</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition: The Sarah Ransome Deposition From The Maxwell/Virginia Roberts Lawsuit (Part 11-13) (5/25/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-sarah-ransome-deposition-from-the-maxwell-virginia-roberts-lawsuit-part-11-13-5-25-26--72157619</link><description><![CDATA[Sarah Ransome’s deposition offers a disturbing account of her exploitation by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. She described being lured to New York under false pretenses and quickly forced into a world of manipulation and abuse. Ransome testified to being coerced into group sexual acts, including one incident involving a well-known attorney. She recounted life on Epstein’s private island and inside his New York mansion as being tightly controlled and openly sexual, where young women were “lent out” to powerful men and Maxwell ran the properties like a brothel. She spoke of being subjected to weight demands, emotionally broken down, and even attempting to escape by swimming away—only to be caught and returned.<br /><br /><br />Ransome also claimed Epstein kept extensive flight logs, took photos and videos of sexual encounters, and may have used them as leverage over high-profile associates. However, her credibility was later challenged after she sent emails alleging the existence of sex tapes involving major political and business figures—claims she later admitted were fabricated in a desperate attempt to draw attention to her situation. She expressed remorse for those statements and acknowledged that they were false. Still, her deposition remains one of the most revealing inside views of how Epstein’s trafficking operation functioned—highlighting both the calculated cruelty of the system and the lasting psychological toll it inflicted on its victims.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23453527-de-701-1-sarah-ransome-depo" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">DE 701-1 — Sarah Ransome depo - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72157619</guid><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 10:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72157619/megaransome11n12n13.mp3" length="46881689" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ec0e6ba7-45b2-4c3f-babe-8919570cfed7/ec0e6ba7-45b2-4c3f-babe-8919570cfed7.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ec0e6ba7-45b2-4c3f-babe-8919570cfed7/ec0e6ba7-45b2-4c3f-babe-8919570cfed7.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ec0e6ba7-45b2-4c3f-babe-8919570cfed7/ec0e6ba7-45b2-4c3f-babe-8919570cfed7.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Sarah Ransome’s deposition offers a disturbing account of her exploitation by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. She described being lured to New York under false pretenses and quickly forced into a world of manipulation and abuse. Ransome...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Sarah Ransome’s deposition offers a disturbing account of her exploitation by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. She described being lured to New York under false pretenses and quickly forced into a world of manipulation and abuse. Ransome testified to being coerced into group sexual acts, including one incident involving a well-known attorney. She recounted life on Epstein’s private island and inside his New York mansion as being tightly controlled and openly sexual, where young women were “lent out” to powerful men and Maxwell ran the properties like a brothel. She spoke of being subjected to weight demands, emotionally broken down, and even attempting to escape by swimming away—only to be caught and returned.<br /><br /><br />Ransome also claimed Epstein kept extensive flight logs, took photos and videos of sexual encounters, and may have used them as leverage over high-profile associates. However, her credibility was later challenged after she sent emails alleging the existence of sex tapes involving major political and business figures—claims she later admitted were fabricated in a desperate attempt to draw attention to her situation. She expressed remorse for those statements and acknowledged that they were false. Still, her deposition remains one of the most revealing inside views of how Epstein’s trafficking operation functioned—highlighting both the calculated cruelty of the system and the lasting psychological toll it inflicted on its victims.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23453527-de-701-1-sarah-ransome-depo" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">DE 701-1 — Sarah Ransome depo - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2931</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>billgates,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epstein,epsteinisland,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,ghislainemaxwellupdates,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinnews,jeffreyepsteinnewsupdates,maxwellnewsupdates,news,newsupdate,princeandrew,princeandrewnews,theyallknew,truecrime,truecrimenewsreport</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition: The Sarah Ransome Deposition From The Maxwell/Virginia Roberts Lawsuit (Part 8-10) (5/25/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-sarah-ransome-deposition-from-the-maxwell-virginia-roberts-lawsuit-part-8-10-5-25-26--72157618</link><description><![CDATA[Sarah Ransome’s deposition offers a disturbing account of her exploitation by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. She described being lured to New York under false pretenses and quickly forced into a world of manipulation and abuse. Ransome testified to being coerced into group sexual acts, including one incident involving a well-known attorney. She recounted life on Epstein’s private island and inside his New York mansion as being tightly controlled and openly sexual, where young women were “lent out” to powerful men and Maxwell ran the properties like a brothel. She spoke of being subjected to weight demands, emotionally broken down, and even attempting to escape by swimming away—only to be caught and returned.<br /><br /><br />Ransome also claimed Epstein kept extensive flight logs, took photos and videos of sexual encounters, and may have used them as leverage over high-profile associates. However, her credibility was later challenged after she sent emails alleging the existence of sex tapes involving major political and business figures—claims she later admitted were fabricated in a desperate attempt to draw attention to her situation. She expressed remorse for those statements and acknowledged that they were false. Still, her deposition remains one of the most revealing inside views of how Epstein’s trafficking operation functioned—highlighting both the calculated cruelty of the system and the lasting psychological toll it inflicted on its victims.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23453527-de-701-1-sarah-ransome-depo" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">DE 701-1 — Sarah Ransome depo - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72157618</guid><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 08:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72157618/megaransome8n9n10.mp3" length="49485575" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/878d0c8b-67af-403f-a9ab-3b97b8f69e22/878d0c8b-67af-403f-a9ab-3b97b8f69e22.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/878d0c8b-67af-403f-a9ab-3b97b8f69e22/878d0c8b-67af-403f-a9ab-3b97b8f69e22.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/878d0c8b-67af-403f-a9ab-3b97b8f69e22/878d0c8b-67af-403f-a9ab-3b97b8f69e22.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Sarah Ransome’s deposition offers a disturbing account of her exploitation by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. She described being lured to New York under false pretenses and quickly forced into a world of manipulation and abuse. Ransome...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Sarah Ransome’s deposition offers a disturbing account of her exploitation by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. She described being lured to New York under false pretenses and quickly forced into a world of manipulation and abuse. Ransome testified to being coerced into group sexual acts, including one incident involving a well-known attorney. She recounted life on Epstein’s private island and inside his New York mansion as being tightly controlled and openly sexual, where young women were “lent out” to powerful men and Maxwell ran the properties like a brothel. She spoke of being subjected to weight demands, emotionally broken down, and even attempting to escape by swimming away—only to be caught and returned.<br /><br /><br />Ransome also claimed Epstein kept extensive flight logs, took photos and videos of sexual encounters, and may have used them as leverage over high-profile associates. However, her credibility was later challenged after she sent emails alleging the existence of sex tapes involving major political and business figures—claims she later admitted were fabricated in a desperate attempt to draw attention to her situation. She expressed remorse for those statements and acknowledged that they were false. Still, her deposition remains one of the most revealing inside views of how Epstein’s trafficking operation functioned—highlighting both the calculated cruelty of the system and the lasting psychological toll it inflicted on its victims.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23453527-de-701-1-sarah-ransome-depo" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">DE 701-1 — Sarah Ransome depo - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3093</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>billgates,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epstein,epsteinisland,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,ghislainemaxwellupdates,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinnews,jeffreyepsteinnewsupdates,maxwellnewsupdates,news,newsupdate,princeandrew,princeandrewnews,theyallknew,truecrime,truecrimenewsreport</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Ghislaine Maxwell Opposes The DOJ's Request To Unseal Grand Jury Files</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/ghislaine-maxwell-opposes-the-doj-s-request-to-unseal-grand-jury-files--72058157</link><description><![CDATA[In her formal response to the government’s motion, Ghislaine Maxwell opposed the unsealing of grand jury transcripts in her criminal case, arguing that such a release would violate long-standing principles of grand jury secrecy and unfairly prejudice her rights. Her legal team emphasized that the transcripts in question contain sensitive testimony and confidential material that should remain protected under Rule 6(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Maxwell’s attorneys insisted that the government's request lacked compelling justification and that releasing the materials would serve no legitimate public interest while potentially influencing public perception and undermining her right to a fair trial.<br /><br />Furthermore, Maxwell’s response accused the government of attempting to circumvent established legal norms for tactical purposes. Her defense argued that any disclosure could taint potential jurors and further inflame the already intense media scrutiny surrounding her case. They maintained that the government had not demonstrated any exceptional circumstances to override the presumption of secrecy traditionally afforded to grand jury proceedings. In closing, Maxwell’s team urged the court to deny the motion and preserve the confidentiality of the grand jury materials to uphold judicial integrity and due process.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.539612/gov.uscourts.nysd.539612.803.0.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">gov.uscourts.nysd.539612.803.0.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72058157</guid><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72058157/maxwellopposesdojrequest.mp3" length="13452896" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/67fe79a9-8e26-48fb-9737-0f0461e6b4ea/67fe79a9-8e26-48fb-9737-0f0461e6b4ea.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/67fe79a9-8e26-48fb-9737-0f0461e6b4ea/67fe79a9-8e26-48fb-9737-0f0461e6b4ea.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/67fe79a9-8e26-48fb-9737-0f0461e6b4ea/67fe79a9-8e26-48fb-9737-0f0461e6b4ea.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In her formal response to the government’s motion, Ghislaine Maxwell opposed the unsealing of grand jury transcripts in her criminal case, arguing that such a release would violate long-standing principles of grand jury secrecy and unfairly prejudice...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In her formal response to the government’s motion, Ghislaine Maxwell opposed the unsealing of grand jury transcripts in her criminal case, arguing that such a release would violate long-standing principles of grand jury secrecy and unfairly prejudice her rights. Her legal team emphasized that the transcripts in question contain sensitive testimony and confidential material that should remain protected under Rule 6(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Maxwell’s attorneys insisted that the government's request lacked compelling justification and that releasing the materials would serve no legitimate public interest while potentially influencing public perception and undermining her right to a fair trial.<br /><br />Furthermore, Maxwell’s response accused the government of attempting to circumvent established legal norms for tactical purposes. Her defense argued that any disclosure could taint potential jurors and further inflame the already intense media scrutiny surrounding her case. They maintained that the government had not demonstrated any exceptional circumstances to override the presumption of secrecy traditionally afforded to grand jury proceedings. In closing, Maxwell’s team urged the court to deny the motion and preserve the confidentiality of the grand jury materials to uphold judicial integrity and due process.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.539612/gov.uscourts.nysd.539612.803.0.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">gov.uscourts.nysd.539612.803.0.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>841</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>billgates,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epstein,epsteinisland,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,ghislainemaxwellupdates,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinnews,jeffreyepsteinnewsupdates,maxwellnewsupdates,news,newsupdate,princeandrew,princeandrewnews,theyallknew,truecrime,truecrimenewsreport</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Alex Acosta Was The Middleman In The Jeffrey Epstein  NPA Negotiation.  Who Was The Architect?</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/alex-acosta-was-the-middleman-in-the-jeffrey-epstein-npa-negotiation-who-was-the-architect--72058156</link><description><![CDATA[Alex Acosta is frequently singled out as the architect of Jeffrey Epstein’s 2008 non-prosecution agreement (NPA), but mounting evidence suggests that he was more of a functionary than a decision-maker. As the U.S. Attorney in South Florida, Acosta did sign off on the sweetheart deal that allowed Epstein to avoid federal prosecution and serve minimal time in a county jail. However, emails and DOJ records show that once Epstein’s legal team escalated their complaints, the matter was kicked up the chain of command to Washington. Acosta even reportedly told the Miami Herald that he was told Epstein “belonged to intelligence” and that backing off was not a choice, further muddying the narrative that he acted independently. The DOJ’s Office of Professional Responsibility later criticized Acosta’s judgment but stopped short of alleging misconduct.<br /><br />The real power players behind the Epstein NPA appear to have been then–Attorney General Michael Mukasey and Deputy Attorney General Mark Filip. When Epstein’s lawyers petitioned to have the case reviewed, DOJ officials in D.C.—including those in the Criminal Division and the Deputy Attorney General’s office—were briefed and ultimately approved the non-prosecution path. In other words, the final green light came from the top of the Justice Department, not Acosta’s office alone. This recontextualizes the NPA as less a rogue local failure and more a coordinated decision at the highest levels of federal power. The narrative that Acosta alone bears the weight of the Epstein scandal not only oversimplifies the truth—it protects the very people who had the authority to stop it and didn’t.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br />https://nypost.com/2021/02/04/top-doj-officials-okd-epstein-deal-maxwell-lawyers/<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72058156</guid><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72058156/whoreallysignedoff.mp3" length="15698173" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/07b31670-62b3-47f0-b38b-ccf2b4984c32/07b31670-62b3-47f0-b38b-ccf2b4984c32.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/07b31670-62b3-47f0-b38b-ccf2b4984c32/07b31670-62b3-47f0-b38b-ccf2b4984c32.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/07b31670-62b3-47f0-b38b-ccf2b4984c32/07b31670-62b3-47f0-b38b-ccf2b4984c32.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Alex Acosta is frequently singled out as the architect of Jeffrey Epstein’s 2008 non-prosecution agreement (NPA), but mounting evidence suggests that he was more of a functionary than a decision-maker. As the U.S. Attorney in South Florida, Acosta did...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Alex Acosta is frequently singled out as the architect of Jeffrey Epstein’s 2008 non-prosecution agreement (NPA), but mounting evidence suggests that he was more of a functionary than a decision-maker. As the U.S. Attorney in South Florida, Acosta did sign off on the sweetheart deal that allowed Epstein to avoid federal prosecution and serve minimal time in a county jail. However, emails and DOJ records show that once Epstein’s legal team escalated their complaints, the matter was kicked up the chain of command to Washington. Acosta even reportedly told the Miami Herald that he was told Epstein “belonged to intelligence” and that backing off was not a choice, further muddying the narrative that he acted independently. The DOJ’s Office of Professional Responsibility later criticized Acosta’s judgment but stopped short of alleging misconduct.<br /><br />The real power players behind the Epstein NPA appear to have been then–Attorney General Michael Mukasey and Deputy Attorney General Mark Filip. When Epstein’s lawyers petitioned to have the case reviewed, DOJ officials in D.C.—including those in the Criminal Division and the Deputy Attorney General’s office—were briefed and ultimately approved the non-prosecution path. In other words, the final green light came from the top of the Justice Department, not Acosta’s office alone. This recontextualizes the NPA as less a rogue local failure and more a coordinated decision at the highest levels of federal power. The narrative that Acosta alone bears the weight of the Epstein scandal not only oversimplifies the truth—it protects the very people who had the authority to stop it and didn’t.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br />https://nypost.com/2021/02/04/top-doj-officials-okd-epstein-deal-maxwell-lawyers/<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>982</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>billgates,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epstein,epsteinisland,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,ghislainemaxwellupdates,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinnews,jeffreyepsteinnewsupdates,maxwellnewsupdates,news,newsupdate,princeandrew,princeandrewnews,theyallknew,truecrime,truecrimenewsreport</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Audacity of Immunity: Epstein's NPA And How The  DOJ Defends the Indefensible (Part 2)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-audacity-of-immunity-epstein-s-npa-and-how-the-doj-defends-the-indefensible-part-2--72058161</link><description><![CDATA[The Department of Justice’s handling of Jeffrey Epstein’s non-prosecution agreement is not a story of legal inevitability but one of institutional protection and betrayal. In 2008, prosecutors secretly struck a deal that gave Epstein and his co-conspirators immunity, hiding it from victims in direct violation of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act. When a federal judge confirmed that violation in 2019, the DOJ had the chance to admit the deal was unlawful and void it. Instead, it doubled down, filing a 35-page defense insisting there was “no legal basis” to undo the sweetheart deal. At the same time, it staged a hollow push to release grand jury records it knew the courts would never unseal—then blamed the judiciary for the failure. This was theater, designed to shift blame while burying what the DOJ actually controls: the rotten deal it authored.<br /><br />The truth is that the DOJ could dismantle the non-prosecution agreement tomorrow. Legal tools exist: declare it void for violating victims’ rights, for being unconscionable, or for undermining public policy. But the department refuses because dismantling it would expose its own complicity, the reputations it protected, and the powerful network Epstein served. By clinging to the deal, the DOJ isn’t upholding the law—it’s shielding itself and the elite beneficiaries of Epstein’s world. The result is a department that masquerades as a guardian of justice while acting as caretaker of corruption. The ultimate betrayal is clear: the very institution meant to protect victims instead became a predator’s last line of defense.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72058161</guid><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72058161/dojdefendsnpa2.mp3" length="20201265" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/daf91d64-9426-45c4-bedb-c92c1eda5867/daf91d64-9426-45c4-bedb-c92c1eda5867.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/daf91d64-9426-45c4-bedb-c92c1eda5867/daf91d64-9426-45c4-bedb-c92c1eda5867.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/daf91d64-9426-45c4-bedb-c92c1eda5867/daf91d64-9426-45c4-bedb-c92c1eda5867.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Department of Justice’s handling of Jeffrey Epstein’s non-prosecution agreement is not a story of legal inevitability but one of institutional protection and betrayal. In 2008, prosecutors secretly struck a deal that gave Epstein and his...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Department of Justice’s handling of Jeffrey Epstein’s non-prosecution agreement is not a story of legal inevitability but one of institutional protection and betrayal. In 2008, prosecutors secretly struck a deal that gave Epstein and his co-conspirators immunity, hiding it from victims in direct violation of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act. When a federal judge confirmed that violation in 2019, the DOJ had the chance to admit the deal was unlawful and void it. Instead, it doubled down, filing a 35-page defense insisting there was “no legal basis” to undo the sweetheart deal. At the same time, it staged a hollow push to release grand jury records it knew the courts would never unseal—then blamed the judiciary for the failure. This was theater, designed to shift blame while burying what the DOJ actually controls: the rotten deal it authored.<br /><br />The truth is that the DOJ could dismantle the non-prosecution agreement tomorrow. Legal tools exist: declare it void for violating victims’ rights, for being unconscionable, or for undermining public policy. But the department refuses because dismantling it would expose its own complicity, the reputations it protected, and the powerful network Epstein served. By clinging to the deal, the DOJ isn’t upholding the law—it’s shielding itself and the elite beneficiaries of Epstein’s world. The result is a department that masquerades as a guardian of justice while acting as caretaker of corruption. The ultimate betrayal is clear: the very institution meant to protect victims instead became a predator’s last line of defense.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1263</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>billgates,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epstein,epsteinisland,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,ghislainemaxwellupdates,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinnews,jeffreyepsteinnewsupdates,maxwellnewsupdates,news,newsupdate,princeandrew,princeandrewnews,theyallknew,truecrime,truecrimenewsreport</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Audacity of Immunity: Epstein's NPA And How The  DOJ Defends the Indefensible (Part 1)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-audacity-of-immunity-epstein-s-npa-and-how-the-doj-defends-the-indefensible-part-1--72058160</link><description><![CDATA[The Department of Justice’s handling of Jeffrey Epstein’s non-prosecution agreement is not a story of legal inevitability but one of institutional protection and betrayal. In 2008, prosecutors secretly struck a deal that gave Epstein and his co-conspirators immunity, hiding it from victims in direct violation of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act. When a federal judge confirmed that violation in 2019, the DOJ had the chance to admit the deal was unlawful and void it. Instead, it doubled down, filing a 35-page defense insisting there was “no legal basis” to undo the sweetheart deal. At the same time, it staged a hollow push to release grand jury records it knew the courts would never unseal—then blamed the judiciary for the failure. This was theater, designed to shift blame while burying what the DOJ actually controls: the rotten deal it authored.<br /><br />The truth is that the DOJ could dismantle the non-prosecution agreement tomorrow. Legal tools exist: declare it void for violating victims’ rights, for being unconscionable, or for undermining public policy. But the department refuses because dismantling it would expose its own complicity, the reputations it protected, and the powerful network Epstein served. By clinging to the deal, the DOJ isn’t upholding the law—it’s shielding itself and the elite beneficiaries of Epstein’s world. The result is a department that masquerades as a guardian of justice while acting as caretaker of corruption. The ultimate betrayal is clear: the very institution meant to protect victims instead became a predator’s last line of defense.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72058160</guid><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72058160/dojdefendsnpa1.mp3" length="10859459" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f5163a98-3b49-4c1b-8c9d-0844b6e7a1ae/f5163a98-3b49-4c1b-8c9d-0844b6e7a1ae.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f5163a98-3b49-4c1b-8c9d-0844b6e7a1ae/f5163a98-3b49-4c1b-8c9d-0844b6e7a1ae.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f5163a98-3b49-4c1b-8c9d-0844b6e7a1ae/f5163a98-3b49-4c1b-8c9d-0844b6e7a1ae.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Department of Justice’s handling of Jeffrey Epstein’s non-prosecution agreement is not a story of legal inevitability but one of institutional protection and betrayal. In 2008, prosecutors secretly struck a deal that gave Epstein and his...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Department of Justice’s handling of Jeffrey Epstein’s non-prosecution agreement is not a story of legal inevitability but one of institutional protection and betrayal. In 2008, prosecutors secretly struck a deal that gave Epstein and his co-conspirators immunity, hiding it from victims in direct violation of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act. When a federal judge confirmed that violation in 2019, the DOJ had the chance to admit the deal was unlawful and void it. Instead, it doubled down, filing a 35-page defense insisting there was “no legal basis” to undo the sweetheart deal. At the same time, it staged a hollow push to release grand jury records it knew the courts would never unseal—then blamed the judiciary for the failure. This was theater, designed to shift blame while burying what the DOJ actually controls: the rotten deal it authored.<br /><br />The truth is that the DOJ could dismantle the non-prosecution agreement tomorrow. Legal tools exist: declare it void for violating victims’ rights, for being unconscionable, or for undermining public policy. But the department refuses because dismantling it would expose its own complicity, the reputations it protected, and the powerful network Epstein served. By clinging to the deal, the DOJ isn’t upholding the law—it’s shielding itself and the elite beneficiaries of Epstein’s world. The result is a department that masquerades as a guardian of justice while acting as caretaker of corruption. The ultimate betrayal is clear: the very institution meant to protect victims instead became a predator’s last line of defense.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>679</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>billgates,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epstein,epsteinisland,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,ghislainemaxwellupdates,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinnews,jeffreyepsteinnewsupdates,maxwellnewsupdates,news,newsupdate,princeandrew,princeandrewnews,theyallknew,truecrime,truecrimenewsreport</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Sarah Kellen And The 302 Interview With The FBI (5/25/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/sarah-kellen-and-the-302-interview-with-the-fbi-5-25-26--72157680</link><description><![CDATA[This FBI FD-302 memorializes a December 4, 2019 proffer interview with a heavily redacted woman who described both financial and sexual dimensions of her relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. She told investigators that in late 2018, after financial stress connected to apartment renovations and after public reporting on Epstein had already intensified, she met Epstein at his New York residence and explained her financial situation. Epstein allegedly called his accountant Richard Kahn during the meeting and arranged for $250,000 to be wired to her, telling her not to tell anyone about the money. She also described receiving another large payment from Epstein, bringing the total to $350,000 between 2013 and 2018. The document also places Lesley Groff in the chain of contact, with the woman saying Groff told her to come meet Epstein if she was in New York. The woman said she did not initially connect the money to press scrutiny or the Miami Herald reporting, portraying Epstein’s payment as part of his broader pattern of financial control and “generosity,” though the timing is obviously significant.<br /><br />The most disturbing portion of the interview centers on the woman’s description of Epstein’s sexual control, coercion, and abuse across multiple locations, including Palm Beach, New York, Paris, New Mexico, and his island. She said Epstein directed her sexually, woke her by touching her, summoned her to sleep in his bed, dictated how she should touch him, controlled aspects of her appearance, and made her feel she had no meaningful choice. She described one Palm Beach gym encounter as an aggressive rape, saying Epstein turned the music up, closed the hurricane shutters, pulled down her pants, and had intercourse with her. She also placed Ghislaine Maxwell directly inside the sexual machinery, saying Maxwell was present during an early encounter, touched her, instructed her where and how to touch Epstein, made sexually explicit comments, and helped normalize Epstein’s demands. The interview also describes Maxwell’s broader household authority: approving bills, running Epstein’s homes, overseeing staff and logistics, and creating an environment where the woman felt isolated, ashamed, dependent, and unable to tell anyone because her friends, work, lawyers, housing, and relationships were all tied back to Epstein’s world.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01246595.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA01246595.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72157680</guid><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72157680/kellen302.mp3" length="16861771" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8344d537-7b92-47a8-822b-2426078cb42a/8344d537-7b92-47a8-822b-2426078cb42a.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8344d537-7b92-47a8-822b-2426078cb42a/8344d537-7b92-47a8-822b-2426078cb42a.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/8344d537-7b92-47a8-822b-2426078cb42a/8344d537-7b92-47a8-822b-2426078cb42a.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>This FBI FD-302 memorializes a December 4, 2019 proffer interview with a heavily redacted woman who described both financial and sexual dimensions of her relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. She told investigators that in late 2018, after financial...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[This FBI FD-302 memorializes a December 4, 2019 proffer interview with a heavily redacted woman who described both financial and sexual dimensions of her relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. She told investigators that in late 2018, after financial stress connected to apartment renovations and after public reporting on Epstein had already intensified, she met Epstein at his New York residence and explained her financial situation. Epstein allegedly called his accountant Richard Kahn during the meeting and arranged for $250,000 to be wired to her, telling her not to tell anyone about the money. She also described receiving another large payment from Epstein, bringing the total to $350,000 between 2013 and 2018. The document also places Lesley Groff in the chain of contact, with the woman saying Groff told her to come meet Epstein if she was in New York. The woman said she did not initially connect the money to press scrutiny or the Miami Herald reporting, portraying Epstein’s payment as part of his broader pattern of financial control and “generosity,” though the timing is obviously significant.<br /><br />The most disturbing portion of the interview centers on the woman’s description of Epstein’s sexual control, coercion, and abuse across multiple locations, including Palm Beach, New York, Paris, New Mexico, and his island. She said Epstein directed her sexually, woke her by touching her, summoned her to sleep in his bed, dictated how she should touch him, controlled aspects of her appearance, and made her feel she had no meaningful choice. She described one Palm Beach gym encounter as an aggressive rape, saying Epstein turned the music up, closed the hurricane shutters, pulled down her pants, and had intercourse with her. She also placed Ghislaine Maxwell directly inside the sexual machinery, saying Maxwell was present during an early encounter, touched her, instructed her where and how to touch Epstein, made sexually explicit comments, and helped normalize Epstein’s demands. The interview also describes Maxwell’s broader household authority: approving bills, running Epstein’s homes, overseeing staff and logistics, and creating an environment where the woman felt isolated, ashamed, dependent, and unable to tell anyone because her friends, work, lawyers, housing, and relationships were all tied back to Epstein’s world.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01246595.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA01246595.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1054</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>billgates,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epstein,epsteinisland,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,ghislainemaxwellupdates,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinnews,jeffreyepsteinnewsupdates,maxwellnewsupdates,news,newsupdate,princeandrew,princeandrewnews,theyallknew,truecrime,truecrimenewsreport</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Former Prince Andrew’s Trade Envoy Role and the Vetting Failure Now Under Scrutiny (5/25/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/former-prince-andrew-s-trade-envoy-role-and-the-vetting-failure-now-under-scrutiny-5-25-26--72147296</link><description><![CDATA[The British government says it has found no evidence that formal security vetting or due diligence was carried out before Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor was appointed as the UK’s special representative for international trade and investment in 2001. Newly released historical documents show that Queen Elizabeth II was “very keen” for Andrew to have a prominent role promoting Britain’s interests, and officials appear to have treated the appointment as a continuation of the royal family’s existing trade-promotion work rather than as a post requiring serious scrutiny. That matters because the job gave Andrew access to senior business and government figures around the world, yet the government now says there is no sign anyone formally examined whether he was fit for that level of access. The documents also reveal a strikingly privileged setup around the role, including notes about the countries Andrew preferred to visit, how his travel should be managed, and the need for careful media handling.<br /><br />The larger significance is that Andrew’s trade envoy role is now being reexamined through the lens of the Epstein scandal and later allegations about his conduct in public office. Andrew served in the unpaid post from 2001 to 2011, traveling internationally and moving through elite diplomatic and commercial circles while carrying royal prestige and government access. The lack of evidence of vetting raises obvious questions about how much deference was given to royal status, how little institutional skepticism existed around Andrew’s suitability, and whether the government effectively allowed him to operate as a high-level national representative without the checks that would normally apply to someone with comparable reach. In hindsight, the documents make the appointment look less like a carefully controlled public role and more like another example of Andrew being handed power, access, and legitimacy because of who he was, not because anyone had seriously tested whether he should have it.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/may/21/security-vetting-due-diligence-prince-andrew-uk-trade-envoy" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">No evidence of formal security vetting when Andrew became UK trade envoy, minister says | UK news | The Guardian</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72147296</guid><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 18:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72147296/andrewnotvettedtradeenvoy.mp3" length="10498342" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a8fa3955-6ad4-47bf-b686-8f3a5c9b09c7/a8fa3955-6ad4-47bf-b686-8f3a5c9b09c7.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a8fa3955-6ad4-47bf-b686-8f3a5c9b09c7/a8fa3955-6ad4-47bf-b686-8f3a5c9b09c7.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a8fa3955-6ad4-47bf-b686-8f3a5c9b09c7/a8fa3955-6ad4-47bf-b686-8f3a5c9b09c7.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The British government says it has found no evidence that formal security vetting or due diligence was carried out before Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor was appointed as the UK’s special representative for international trade and investment in 2001. Newly...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The British government says it has found no evidence that formal security vetting or due diligence was carried out before Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor was appointed as the UK’s special representative for international trade and investment in 2001. Newly released historical documents show that Queen Elizabeth II was “very keen” for Andrew to have a prominent role promoting Britain’s interests, and officials appear to have treated the appointment as a continuation of the royal family’s existing trade-promotion work rather than as a post requiring serious scrutiny. That matters because the job gave Andrew access to senior business and government figures around the world, yet the government now says there is no sign anyone formally examined whether he was fit for that level of access. The documents also reveal a strikingly privileged setup around the role, including notes about the countries Andrew preferred to visit, how his travel should be managed, and the need for careful media handling.<br /><br />The larger significance is that Andrew’s trade envoy role is now being reexamined through the lens of the Epstein scandal and later allegations about his conduct in public office. Andrew served in the unpaid post from 2001 to 2011, traveling internationally and moving through elite diplomatic and commercial circles while carrying royal prestige and government access. The lack of evidence of vetting raises obvious questions about how much deference was given to royal status, how little institutional skepticism existed around Andrew’s suitability, and whether the government effectively allowed him to operate as a high-level national representative without the checks that would normally apply to someone with comparable reach. In hindsight, the documents make the appointment look less like a carefully controlled public role and more like another example of Andrew being handed power, access, and legitimacy because of who he was, not because anyone had seriously tested whether he should have it.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/may/21/security-vetting-due-diligence-prince-andrew-uk-trade-envoy" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">No evidence of formal security vetting when Andrew became UK trade envoy, minister says | UK news | The Guardian</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>657</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and the Most Serious Legal Threat He Has Faced (5/25/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/andrew-mountbatten-windsor-and-the-most-serious-legal-threat-he-has-faced-5-25-26--72115618</link><description><![CDATA[Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor is now facing a broadened police inquiry in Britain that goes beyond the original misconduct-in-public-office allegation tied to his former role as a UK trade envoy. Thames Valley Police are reportedly examining possible sexual misconduct, corruption, fraud, dishonesty, abuse of power, and dereliction of duty as part of a widening investigation connected to his long relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Police have already arrested and questioned Andrew, searched properties linked to him, and appealed for witnesses as they try to determine whether his position as a public representative was misused. The investigation was originally prompted by material from the U.S. Epstein files suggesting Andrew may have shared confidential trade information with Epstein while holding a government-backed role, but detectives are now also looking at whether any alleged misconduct involved sexual exploitation or abuse of public office.<br /><br />A major new strand involves police engagement with lawyers for a woman who alleges she was taken to Andrew’s Windsor home in 2010 “for sexual purposes.” Authorities have not said that a formal criminal complaint has been filed on that specific claim, and Andrew strongly denies wrongdoing, but the fact that investigators are actively appealing for witnesses shows the probe is expanding rather than narrowing. The case is especially significant because it connects several previously separate Andrew controversies into one possible investigative framework: Epstein, royal access, trade envoy privilege, alleged misuse of power, and claims involving women brought into elite settings. No charges have been announced, and police are stressing that the inquiry will take time, but this marks one of the most serious legal developments Andrew has faced because it places his Epstein-era conduct directly inside an active British criminal investigation.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-15839369/Andrew-Mountbatten-Windsor-sex-offences-police-probe.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Police probe Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor over 'sex offences': Stunning update on investigation of former prince as officers appeal for potential 'victim survivors' to come forward | Daily Mail Online</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72115618</guid><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72115618/andrewsexoffenceprobe.mp3" length="17045255" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/894922a6-22ab-4fcf-b902-35c7c9972a50/894922a6-22ab-4fcf-b902-35c7c9972a50.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/894922a6-22ab-4fcf-b902-35c7c9972a50/894922a6-22ab-4fcf-b902-35c7c9972a50.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/894922a6-22ab-4fcf-b902-35c7c9972a50/894922a6-22ab-4fcf-b902-35c7c9972a50.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor is now facing a broadened police inquiry in Britain that goes beyond the original misconduct-in-public-office allegation tied to his former role as a UK trade envoy. Thames Valley Police are reportedly examining possible...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor is now facing a broadened police inquiry in Britain that goes beyond the original misconduct-in-public-office allegation tied to his former role as a UK trade envoy. Thames Valley Police are reportedly examining possible sexual misconduct, corruption, fraud, dishonesty, abuse of power, and dereliction of duty as part of a widening investigation connected to his long relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Police have already arrested and questioned Andrew, searched properties linked to him, and appealed for witnesses as they try to determine whether his position as a public representative was misused. The investigation was originally prompted by material from the U.S. Epstein files suggesting Andrew may have shared confidential trade information with Epstein while holding a government-backed role, but detectives are now also looking at whether any alleged misconduct involved sexual exploitation or abuse of public office.<br /><br />A major new strand involves police engagement with lawyers for a woman who alleges she was taken to Andrew’s Windsor home in 2010 “for sexual purposes.” Authorities have not said that a formal criminal complaint has been filed on that specific claim, and Andrew strongly denies wrongdoing, but the fact that investigators are actively appealing for witnesses shows the probe is expanding rather than narrowing. The case is especially significant because it connects several previously separate Andrew controversies into one possible investigative framework: Epstein, royal access, trade envoy privilege, alleged misuse of power, and claims involving women brought into elite settings. No charges have been announced, and police are stressing that the inquiry will take time, but this marks one of the most serious legal developments Andrew has faced because it places his Epstein-era conduct directly inside an active British criminal investigation.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-15839369/Andrew-Mountbatten-Windsor-sex-offences-police-probe.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Police probe Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor over 'sex offences': Stunning update on investigation of former prince as officers appeal for potential 'victim survivors' to come forward | Daily Mail Online</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1066</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Sarah Kellen, Three New Names, and the Expanding Epstein Inquiry (5/25/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/sarah-kellen-three-new-names-and-the-expanding-epstein-inquiry-5-25-26--72147295</link><description><![CDATA[Sarah Kellen’s closed-door interview with the House Oversight Committee is being described by Chairman James Comer as the most substantive and productive testimony the committee has received so far in its Epstein probe. Kellen, one of the four women named as a potential co-conspirator in Epstein’s 2008 non-prosecution agreement, reportedly gave lawmakers three new names of people she said were involved in Epstein’s abuse operation. Comer said those names were new to the committee and that Kellen had been “very helpful,” with the committee planning to release the transcript as quickly as possible. That alone makes the testimony significant because Kellen was not some peripheral figure; she worked for Epstein for more than a decade, has long been accused by survivors and court filings of helping schedule massages and manage logistics, and was protected by the same controversial Florida deal that helped keep Epstein’s wider network from being fully exposed.<br /><br />Kellen’s testimony also directly confronted the central controversy around her role: she denied being Epstein’s accomplice and instead described herself as one of his victims. In her prepared remarks, she said Epstein sexually and psychologically abused, controlled, manipulated, and dominated her for years, claiming she had no real power and was trapped by dependence, fear, and coercion. She also said she was never interviewed by law enforcement before being branded a potential co-conspirator in the plea agreement, arguing that the federal government placed her name in a secret deal with her abuser without hearing her side. For investigators and survivors, though, the testimony does not close the book; it opens a harder chapter. If Kellen provided new names, new context, and a detailed account of how Epstein controlled the people around him, then Congress now has a deeper trail to follow—not only into Epstein’s abuse, but into why the justice system failed for so long to separate victims, facilitators, witnesses, and protected insiders.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.ms.now/news/sarah-kellen-gave-most-substantive-testimony-yet-in-epstein-probe-comer-says" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Sarah Kellen gave ‘most substantive’ testimony yet in Epstein probe, Comer says</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72147295</guid><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72147295/kellentestimony.mp3" length="13753408" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/06aece4e-8d8c-4f29-9137-7f782083a128/06aece4e-8d8c-4f29-9137-7f782083a128.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/06aece4e-8d8c-4f29-9137-7f782083a128/06aece4e-8d8c-4f29-9137-7f782083a128.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/06aece4e-8d8c-4f29-9137-7f782083a128/06aece4e-8d8c-4f29-9137-7f782083a128.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Sarah Kellen’s closed-door interview with the House Oversight Committee is being described by Chairman James Comer as the most substantive and productive testimony the committee has received so far in its Epstein probe. Kellen, one of the four women...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Sarah Kellen’s closed-door interview with the House Oversight Committee is being described by Chairman James Comer as the most substantive and productive testimony the committee has received so far in its Epstein probe. Kellen, one of the four women named as a potential co-conspirator in Epstein’s 2008 non-prosecution agreement, reportedly gave lawmakers three new names of people she said were involved in Epstein’s abuse operation. Comer said those names were new to the committee and that Kellen had been “very helpful,” with the committee planning to release the transcript as quickly as possible. That alone makes the testimony significant because Kellen was not some peripheral figure; she worked for Epstein for more than a decade, has long been accused by survivors and court filings of helping schedule massages and manage logistics, and was protected by the same controversial Florida deal that helped keep Epstein’s wider network from being fully exposed.<br /><br />Kellen’s testimony also directly confronted the central controversy around her role: she denied being Epstein’s accomplice and instead described herself as one of his victims. In her prepared remarks, she said Epstein sexually and psychologically abused, controlled, manipulated, and dominated her for years, claiming she had no real power and was trapped by dependence, fear, and coercion. She also said she was never interviewed by law enforcement before being branded a potential co-conspirator in the plea agreement, arguing that the federal government placed her name in a secret deal with her abuser without hearing her side. For investigators and survivors, though, the testimony does not close the book; it opens a harder chapter. If Kellen provided new names, new context, and a detailed account of how Epstein controlled the people around him, then Congress now has a deeper trail to follow—not only into Epstein’s abuse, but into why the justice system failed for so long to separate victims, facilitators, witnesses, and protected insiders.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.ms.now/news/sarah-kellen-gave-most-substantive-testimony-yet-in-epstein-probe-comer-says" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Sarah Kellen gave ‘most substantive’ testimony yet in Epstein probe, Comer says</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>860</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Paolo Zampolli’s Alleged Role in the Trump-Melania Origin Story (5/25/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/paolo-zampolli-s-alleged-role-in-the-trump-melania-origin-story-5-25-26--72100405</link><description><![CDATA[Paolo Zampolli is presented as a key figure in the Trump-Melania-Epstein timeline because he says he introduced Melania to Donald Trump in 1998 and insists Jeffrey Epstein had nothing to do with it. Zampolli ran ID Models, helped bring Melania into the U.S. modeling world, and later became closely tied to Trump socially and politically. His account matters because Epstein’s files and related reporting keep pointing back to the modeling industry as one of the major pipelines through which young women were recruited, moved, and introduced into elite circles. Zampolli’s agency, Melania’s early career, Trump’s social world, Jean-Luc Brunel’s modeling network, and Epstein’s interest in models all sit inside the same broader ecosystem, which is why his version of events is now being reexamined.<br /><br />Amanda Ungaro, a Brazilian former model and Zampolli’s former partner, adds another layer to that timeline. She has said she was flown on Epstein’s plane as a teenager through Jean-Luc Brunel and saw very young girls around that world. She later worked with Zampolli’s modeling agency and moved through elite social circles connected to Trump before her relationship with Zampolli collapsed into legal and immigration disputes. The central point is that the old, clean explanation — Zampolli introduced Melania to Trump, Epstein had nothing to do with it — now sits alongside a messier record of overlapping modeling networks, Epstein-linked figures, young foreign models, elite parties, immigration leverage, and people who keep showing up in the same circles.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.rawstory.com/raw-investigates/paolo-zampolli-melania/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein recruiter's FBI note contradicts Melania story — and may have triggered her panic - Raw Story</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72100405</guid><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72100405/melaniapaoloadriana.mp3" length="18439567" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f913b320-2aa6-4a65-bb48-8a5d2044f1ad/f913b320-2aa6-4a65-bb48-8a5d2044f1ad.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f913b320-2aa6-4a65-bb48-8a5d2044f1ad/f913b320-2aa6-4a65-bb48-8a5d2044f1ad.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f913b320-2aa6-4a65-bb48-8a5d2044f1ad/f913b320-2aa6-4a65-bb48-8a5d2044f1ad.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Paolo Zampolli is presented as a key figure in the Trump-Melania-Epstein timeline because he says he introduced Melania to Donald Trump in 1998 and insists Jeffrey Epstein had nothing to do with it. Zampolli ran ID Models, helped bring Melania into...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Paolo Zampolli is presented as a key figure in the Trump-Melania-Epstein timeline because he says he introduced Melania to Donald Trump in 1998 and insists Jeffrey Epstein had nothing to do with it. Zampolli ran ID Models, helped bring Melania into the U.S. modeling world, and later became closely tied to Trump socially and politically. His account matters because Epstein’s files and related reporting keep pointing back to the modeling industry as one of the major pipelines through which young women were recruited, moved, and introduced into elite circles. Zampolli’s agency, Melania’s early career, Trump’s social world, Jean-Luc Brunel’s modeling network, and Epstein’s interest in models all sit inside the same broader ecosystem, which is why his version of events is now being reexamined.<br /><br />Amanda Ungaro, a Brazilian former model and Zampolli’s former partner, adds another layer to that timeline. She has said she was flown on Epstein’s plane as a teenager through Jean-Luc Brunel and saw very young girls around that world. She later worked with Zampolli’s modeling agency and moved through elite social circles connected to Trump before her relationship with Zampolli collapsed into legal and immigration disputes. The central point is that the old, clean explanation — Zampolli introduced Melania to Trump, Epstein had nothing to do with it — now sits alongside a messier record of overlapping modeling networks, Epstein-linked figures, young foreign models, elite parties, immigration leverage, and people who keep showing up in the same circles.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.rawstory.com/raw-investigates/paolo-zampolli-melania/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein recruiter's FBI note contradicts Melania story — and may have triggered her panic - Raw Story</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1153</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition: The Sarah Ransome Deposition From The Maxwell/Virginia Roberts Lawsuit (Part 1-4) (5/25/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-sarah-ransome-deposition-from-the-maxwell-virginia-roberts-lawsuit-part-1-4-5-25-26--72142022</link><description><![CDATA[Sarah Ransome’s deposition offers a disturbing account of her exploitation by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. She described being lured to New York under false pretenses and quickly forced into a world of manipulation and abuse. Ransome testified to being coerced into group sexual acts, including one incident involving a well-known attorney. She recounted life on Epstein’s private island and inside his New York mansion as being tightly controlled and openly sexual, where young women were “lent out” to powerful men and Maxwell ran the properties like a brothel. She spoke of being subjected to weight demands, emotionally broken down, and even attempting to escape by swimming away—only to be caught and returned.<br /><br /><br />Ransome also claimed Epstein kept extensive flight logs, took photos and videos of sexual encounters, and may have used them as leverage over high-profile associates. However, her credibility was later challenged after she sent emails alleging the existence of sex tapes involving major political and business figures—claims she later admitted were fabricated in a desperate attempt to draw attention to her situation. She expressed remorse for those statements and acknowledged that they were false. Still, her deposition remains one of the most revealing inside views of how Epstein’s trafficking operation functioned—highlighting both the calculated cruelty of the system and the lasting psychological toll it inflicted on its victims.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23453527-de-701-1-sarah-ransome-depo" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">DE 701-1 — Sarah Ransome depo - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72142022</guid><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72142022/megaransome1n2n3n4.mp3" length="55341183" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/17e62258-0780-4ca9-8cf5-9a9aa38181e8/17e62258-0780-4ca9-8cf5-9a9aa38181e8.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/17e62258-0780-4ca9-8cf5-9a9aa38181e8/17e62258-0780-4ca9-8cf5-9a9aa38181e8.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/17e62258-0780-4ca9-8cf5-9a9aa38181e8/17e62258-0780-4ca9-8cf5-9a9aa38181e8.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Sarah Ransome’s deposition offers a disturbing account of her exploitation by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. She described being lured to New York under false pretenses and quickly forced into a world of manipulation and abuse. Ransome...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Sarah Ransome’s deposition offers a disturbing account of her exploitation by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. She described being lured to New York under false pretenses and quickly forced into a world of manipulation and abuse. Ransome testified to being coerced into group sexual acts, including one incident involving a well-known attorney. She recounted life on Epstein’s private island and inside his New York mansion as being tightly controlled and openly sexual, where young women were “lent out” to powerful men and Maxwell ran the properties like a brothel. She spoke of being subjected to weight demands, emotionally broken down, and even attempting to escape by swimming away—only to be caught and returned.<br /><br /><br />Ransome also claimed Epstein kept extensive flight logs, took photos and videos of sexual encounters, and may have used them as leverage over high-profile associates. However, her credibility was later challenged after she sent emails alleging the existence of sex tapes involving major political and business figures—claims she later admitted were fabricated in a desperate attempt to draw attention to her situation. She expressed remorse for those statements and acknowledged that they were false. Still, her deposition remains one of the most revealing inside views of how Epstein’s trafficking operation functioned—highlighting both the calculated cruelty of the system and the lasting psychological toll it inflicted on its victims.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23453527-de-701-1-sarah-ransome-depo" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">DE 701-1 — Sarah Ransome depo - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3459</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  How Jeffrey Epstein Ingratiated Himself On Campuses Nationwide (5/24/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-how-jeffrey-epstein-ingratiated-himself-on-campuses-nationwide-5-24-26--72133142</link><description><![CDATA[<br /><br /><br />After Jeffrey Epstein’s 2008 conviction for soliciting sex from a minor became public, one of the most controversial aspects of his continued influence was how he managed to maintain deep ties to elite academic institutions — particularly Harvard University. Despite being a registered sex offender, Epstein retained an office connected to Harvard through his relationship with the university’s Program for Evolutionary Dynamics, which had originally been established during the presidency of Lawrence Summers. Epstein had donated money to the program and continued visiting campus regularly even after his conviction, meeting with professors, scientists, and prominent intellectuals while presenting himself as a wealthy patron of science and academic research. Reports later revealed that Epstein’s name was associated with office space and university access long after many institutions publicly claimed to have distanced themselves from him. Critics argued that Harvard’s willingness to keep the door open to Epstein after his conviction reflected the broader culture of elite protection surrounding powerful donors, where wealth and influence often appeared to outweigh moral accountability.<br /><br />Another troubling element of Epstein’s academic and social network involved his association with a secluded cabin property tied to the prestigious Interlochen Center for the Arts in Michigan. Epstein reportedly sponsored and maintained access to a private cabin near the campus, using it as part of his broader network of elite social spaces connected to young artists, intellectuals, and rising talent. Former associates and reporting on Epstein’s movements described the cabin as one of several properties and retreat-style locations where Epstein cultivated relationships with academics, performers, scientists, and influential figures away from public scrutiny. The revelations fueled further questions about how Epstein embedded himself so deeply into elite educational and cultural institutions for years after his criminal conduct was already widely known, with critics arguing that institutions repeatedly ignored glaring warning signs because of the prestige, money, and connections Epstein brought with him.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72133142</guid><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72133142/megaepsteinharvardofficeinterlochen.mp3" length="38932106" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/68a6651f-7c65-4308-b805-d8ab1bba1b69/68a6651f-7c65-4308-b805-d8ab1bba1b69.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/68a6651f-7c65-4308-b805-d8ab1bba1b69/68a6651f-7c65-4308-b805-d8ab1bba1b69.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/68a6651f-7c65-4308-b805-d8ab1bba1b69/68a6651f-7c65-4308-b805-d8ab1bba1b69.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>After Jeffrey Epstein’s 2008 conviction for soliciting sex from a minor became public, one of the most controversial aspects of his continued influence was how he managed to maintain deep ties to elite academic institutions — particularly Harvard...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br /><br /><br />After Jeffrey Epstein’s 2008 conviction for soliciting sex from a minor became public, one of the most controversial aspects of his continued influence was how he managed to maintain deep ties to elite academic institutions — particularly Harvard University. Despite being a registered sex offender, Epstein retained an office connected to Harvard through his relationship with the university’s Program for Evolutionary Dynamics, which had originally been established during the presidency of Lawrence Summers. Epstein had donated money to the program and continued visiting campus regularly even after his conviction, meeting with professors, scientists, and prominent intellectuals while presenting himself as a wealthy patron of science and academic research. Reports later revealed that Epstein’s name was associated with office space and university access long after many institutions publicly claimed to have distanced themselves from him. Critics argued that Harvard’s willingness to keep the door open to Epstein after his conviction reflected the broader culture of elite protection surrounding powerful donors, where wealth and influence often appeared to outweigh moral accountability.<br /><br />Another troubling element of Epstein’s academic and social network involved his association with a secluded cabin property tied to the prestigious Interlochen Center for the Arts in Michigan. Epstein reportedly sponsored and maintained access to a private cabin near the campus, using it as part of his broader network of elite social spaces connected to young artists, intellectuals, and rising talent. Former associates and reporting on Epstein’s movements described the cabin as one of several properties and retreat-style locations where Epstein cultivated relationships with academics, performers, scientists, and influential figures away from public scrutiny. The revelations fueled further questions about how Epstein embedded himself so deeply into elite educational and cultural institutions for years after his criminal conduct was already widely known, with critics arguing that institutions repeatedly ignored glaring warning signs because of the prestige, money, and connections Epstein brought with him.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2434</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   Inside Epstein’s Earliest Florida Victim Account (5/25/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-inside-epstein-s-earliest-florida-victim-account-5-25-26--72133141</link><description><![CDATA[In this latest edition of The Epstein Files Unsealed we get a look at the sworn statement and recorded interviews of a teenage girl who became entangled in Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking operation after being recruited by another minor, identified in the records as “Haley.” The girl initially described being told she was simply going along to collect money and go shopping, with no clear explanation of what would occur. She recounted being taken to Epstein’s Palm Beach home, passing through security, and being left alone upstairs with Epstein after Haley remained downstairs. Under pressure and confusion, she was instructed to undress and give Epstein a massage, during which he masturbated and made sexually explicit comments. She was then paid $300 and sent away, with Epstein acting casually afterward and encouraging her to return. The girl’s testimony shows she did not understand the full nature of what was expected of her until she was already isolated and in the situation, a pattern consistent with grooming and coercion rather than informed consent.<br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Freedom%20of%20Information%20Act%20(FOIA)/Florida/Epstein%20Part%2008%20(Redacted).pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein Part 08 (Redacted).pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72133141</guid><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72133141/megajanedoe2villafana.mp3" length="52923707" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d66b1c5c-31a2-4e26-a088-abaefedd9ae5/d66b1c5c-31a2-4e26-a088-abaefedd9ae5.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d66b1c5c-31a2-4e26-a088-abaefedd9ae5/d66b1c5c-31a2-4e26-a088-abaefedd9ae5.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/d66b1c5c-31a2-4e26-a088-abaefedd9ae5/d66b1c5c-31a2-4e26-a088-abaefedd9ae5.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In this latest edition of The Epstein Files Unsealed we get a look at the sworn statement and recorded interviews of a teenage girl who became entangled in Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking operation after being recruited by another minor, identified in...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this latest edition of The Epstein Files Unsealed we get a look at the sworn statement and recorded interviews of a teenage girl who became entangled in Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking operation after being recruited by another minor, identified in the records as “Haley.” The girl initially described being told she was simply going along to collect money and go shopping, with no clear explanation of what would occur. She recounted being taken to Epstein’s Palm Beach home, passing through security, and being left alone upstairs with Epstein after Haley remained downstairs. Under pressure and confusion, she was instructed to undress and give Epstein a massage, during which he masturbated and made sexually explicit comments. She was then paid $300 and sent away, with Epstein acting casually afterward and encouraging her to return. The girl’s testimony shows she did not understand the full nature of what was expected of her until she was already isolated and in the situation, a pattern consistent with grooming and coercion rather than informed consent.<br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Freedom%20of%20Information%20Act%20(FOIA)/Florida/Epstein%20Part%2008%20(Redacted).pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Epstein Part 08 (Redacted).pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3308</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Ghislaine Maxwell And The Deposition That Led To Her Downfall (Part 23)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/ghislaine-maxwell-and-the-deposition-that-led-to-her-downfall-part-23--72070668</link><description><![CDATA[In a videotaped deposition taken in April 2016, Maxwell was questioned under oath about Giuffre’s allegations of being groomed and trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell—allegations that she vehemently denied, calling Giuffre an “absolute liar” and asserting she had no involvement in recruiting or abusing her. Maxwell repeatedly refused to answer questions about alleged sexual activity with minors—labeling them as inquiries into “consensual adult sex”—and insisted she had no knowledge of underage abuse. She denied any wrongdoing or participation in Epstein’s trafficking network, attempting to distance herself from all aspects of Giuffre’s claims.<br /><br />Critics and federal prosecutors later pointed to this deposition as a key piece of evidence in her criminal indictment: they argue Maxwell knowingly made false statements under oath, which became the basis for two counts of perjury in her 2021 criminal charges. Despite her denials, corroborating evidence—including testimony about threesomes with minor girls, flight logs, and recruitment patterns—cast serious doubt on her credibility. Giuffre’s suit was ultimately settled in 2017, reportedly for millions of dollars, but the unsealed deposition—and Maxwell’s fierce denials—now serve as a stark contrast to the weight of testimony and documentation later vetted in court.<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/7274476-Ghislaine-Maxwell-Deposition-Transcript" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ghislaine Maxwell Deposition Transcript - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72070668</guid><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72070668/maxdepoprt23.mp3" length="14486091" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/be618618-e095-47f8-bb48-95c04fa770ce/be618618-e095-47f8-bb48-95c04fa770ce.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/be618618-e095-47f8-bb48-95c04fa770ce/be618618-e095-47f8-bb48-95c04fa770ce.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/be618618-e095-47f8-bb48-95c04fa770ce/be618618-e095-47f8-bb48-95c04fa770ce.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In a videotaped deposition taken in April 2016, Maxwell was questioned under oath about Giuffre’s allegations of being groomed and trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell—allegations that she vehemently denied, calling Giuffre an “absolute liar” and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In a videotaped deposition taken in April 2016, Maxwell was questioned under oath about Giuffre’s allegations of being groomed and trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell—allegations that she vehemently denied, calling Giuffre an “absolute liar” and asserting she had no involvement in recruiting or abusing her. Maxwell repeatedly refused to answer questions about alleged sexual activity with minors—labeling them as inquiries into “consensual adult sex”—and insisted she had no knowledge of underage abuse. She denied any wrongdoing or participation in Epstein’s trafficking network, attempting to distance herself from all aspects of Giuffre’s claims.<br /><br />Critics and federal prosecutors later pointed to this deposition as a key piece of evidence in her criminal indictment: they argue Maxwell knowingly made false statements under oath, which became the basis for two counts of perjury in her 2021 criminal charges. Despite her denials, corroborating evidence—including testimony about threesomes with minor girls, flight logs, and recruitment patterns—cast serious doubt on her credibility. Giuffre’s suit was ultimately settled in 2017, reportedly for millions of dollars, but the unsealed deposition—and Maxwell’s fierce denials—now serve as a stark contrast to the weight of testimony and documentation later vetted in court.<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/7274476-Ghislaine-Maxwell-Deposition-Transcript" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ghislaine Maxwell Deposition Transcript - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>906</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>billgates,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epstein,epsteinisland,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,ghislainemaxwellupdates,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinnews,jeffreyepsteinnewsupdates,maxwellnewsupdates,news,newsupdate,princeandrew,princeandrewnews,theyallknew,truecrime,truecrimenewsreport</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Ghislaine Maxwell And The Deposition That Led To Her Downfall (Part 22)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/ghislaine-maxwell-and-the-deposition-that-led-to-her-downfall-part-22--72070671</link><description><![CDATA[In a videotaped deposition taken in April 2016, Maxwell was questioned under oath about Giuffre’s allegations of being groomed and trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell—allegations that she vehemently denied, calling Giuffre an “absolute liar” and asserting she had no involvement in recruiting or abusing her. Maxwell repeatedly refused to answer questions about alleged sexual activity with minors—labeling them as inquiries into “consensual adult sex”—and insisted she had no knowledge of underage abuse. She denied any wrongdoing or participation in Epstein’s trafficking network, attempting to distance herself from all aspects of Giuffre’s claims.<br /><br />Critics and federal prosecutors later pointed to this deposition as a key piece of evidence in her criminal indictment: they argue Maxwell knowingly made false statements under oath, which became the basis for two counts of perjury in her 2021 criminal charges. Despite her denials, corroborating evidence—including testimony about threesomes with minor girls, flight logs, and recruitment patterns—cast serious doubt on her credibility. Giuffre’s suit was ultimately settled in 2017, reportedly for millions of dollars, but the unsealed deposition—and Maxwell’s fierce denials—now serve as a stark contrast to the weight of testimony and documentation later vetted in court.<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/7274476-Ghislaine-Maxwell-Deposition-Transcript" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ghislaine Maxwell Deposition Transcript - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72070671</guid><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72070671/maxdepoprt22.mp3" length="12199436" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f3b10aff-87d3-4a5d-9e4f-e119dade772d/f3b10aff-87d3-4a5d-9e4f-e119dade772d.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f3b10aff-87d3-4a5d-9e4f-e119dade772d/f3b10aff-87d3-4a5d-9e4f-e119dade772d.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/f3b10aff-87d3-4a5d-9e4f-e119dade772d/f3b10aff-87d3-4a5d-9e4f-e119dade772d.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In a videotaped deposition taken in April 2016, Maxwell was questioned under oath about Giuffre’s allegations of being groomed and trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell—allegations that she vehemently denied, calling Giuffre an “absolute liar” and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In a videotaped deposition taken in April 2016, Maxwell was questioned under oath about Giuffre’s allegations of being groomed and trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell—allegations that she vehemently denied, calling Giuffre an “absolute liar” and asserting she had no involvement in recruiting or abusing her. Maxwell repeatedly refused to answer questions about alleged sexual activity with minors—labeling them as inquiries into “consensual adult sex”—and insisted she had no knowledge of underage abuse. She denied any wrongdoing or participation in Epstein’s trafficking network, attempting to distance herself from all aspects of Giuffre’s claims.<br /><br />Critics and federal prosecutors later pointed to this deposition as a key piece of evidence in her criminal indictment: they argue Maxwell knowingly made false statements under oath, which became the basis for two counts of perjury in her 2021 criminal charges. Despite her denials, corroborating evidence—including testimony about threesomes with minor girls, flight logs, and recruitment patterns—cast serious doubt on her credibility. Giuffre’s suit was ultimately settled in 2017, reportedly for millions of dollars, but the unsealed deposition—and Maxwell’s fierce denials—now serve as a stark contrast to the weight of testimony and documentation later vetted in court.<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/7274476-Ghislaine-Maxwell-Deposition-Transcript" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ghislaine Maxwell Deposition Transcript - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>763</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>billgates,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epstein,epsteinisland,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,ghislainemaxwellupdates,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinnews,jeffreyepsteinnewsupdates,maxwellnewsupdates,news,newsupdate,princeandrew,princeandrewnews,theyallknew,truecrime,truecrimenewsreport</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Ghislaine Maxwell And The Deposition That Led To Her Downfall (Part 21)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/ghislaine-maxwell-and-the-deposition-that-led-to-her-downfall-part-21--72070669</link><description><![CDATA[In a videotaped deposition taken in April 2016, Maxwell was questioned under oath about Giuffre’s allegations of being groomed and trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell—allegations that she vehemently denied, calling Giuffre an “absolute liar” and asserting she had no involvement in recruiting or abusing her. Maxwell repeatedly refused to answer questions about alleged sexual activity with minors—labeling them as inquiries into “consensual adult sex”—and insisted she had no knowledge of underage abuse. She denied any wrongdoing or participation in Epstein’s trafficking network, attempting to distance herself from all aspects of Giuffre’s claims.<br /><br />Critics and federal prosecutors later pointed to this deposition as a key piece of evidence in her criminal indictment: they argue Maxwell knowingly made false statements under oath, which became the basis for two counts of perjury in her 2021 criminal charges. Despite her denials, corroborating evidence—including testimony about threesomes with minor girls, flight logs, and recruitment patterns—cast serious doubt on her credibility. Giuffre’s suit was ultimately settled in 2017, reportedly for millions of dollars, but the unsealed deposition—and Maxwell’s fierce denials—now serve as a stark contrast to the weight of testimony and documentation later vetted in court.<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/7274476-Ghislaine-Maxwell-Deposition-Transcript" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ghislaine Maxwell Deposition Transcript - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72070669</guid><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72070669/maxdepoprt21.mp3" length="16915688" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/71582d28-49b0-412c-84c3-faab320a065f/71582d28-49b0-412c-84c3-faab320a065f.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/71582d28-49b0-412c-84c3-faab320a065f/71582d28-49b0-412c-84c3-faab320a065f.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/71582d28-49b0-412c-84c3-faab320a065f/71582d28-49b0-412c-84c3-faab320a065f.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In a videotaped deposition taken in April 2016, Maxwell was questioned under oath about Giuffre’s allegations of being groomed and trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell—allegations that she vehemently denied, calling Giuffre an “absolute liar” and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In a videotaped deposition taken in April 2016, Maxwell was questioned under oath about Giuffre’s allegations of being groomed and trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell—allegations that she vehemently denied, calling Giuffre an “absolute liar” and asserting she had no involvement in recruiting or abusing her. Maxwell repeatedly refused to answer questions about alleged sexual activity with minors—labeling them as inquiries into “consensual adult sex”—and insisted she had no knowledge of underage abuse. She denied any wrongdoing or participation in Epstein’s trafficking network, attempting to distance herself from all aspects of Giuffre’s claims.<br /><br />Critics and federal prosecutors later pointed to this deposition as a key piece of evidence in her criminal indictment: they argue Maxwell knowingly made false statements under oath, which became the basis for two counts of perjury in her 2021 criminal charges. Despite her denials, corroborating evidence—including testimony about threesomes with minor girls, flight logs, and recruitment patterns—cast serious doubt on her credibility. Giuffre’s suit was ultimately settled in 2017, reportedly for millions of dollars, but the unsealed deposition—and Maxwell’s fierce denials—now serve as a stark contrast to the weight of testimony and documentation later vetted in court.<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/7274476-Ghislaine-Maxwell-Deposition-Transcript" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ghislaine Maxwell Deposition Transcript - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1058</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>billgates,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epstein,epsteinisland,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,ghislainemaxwellupdates,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinnews,jeffreyepsteinnewsupdates,maxwellnewsupdates,news,newsupdate,princeandrew,princeandrewnews,theyallknew,truecrime,truecrimenewsreport</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Inside The OIG Interview:  The Testimony Of An Unnamed CO/Lieutenant (Part 8) (5/24/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/inside-the-oig-interview-the-testimony-of-an-unnamed-co-lieutenant-part-8-5-24-26--72141846</link><description><![CDATA[<br /><br /><br />In a sworn interview with DOJ Office of Inspector General investigators conducted on June 14, 2021, an unnamed lieutenant and former correctional officer from MCC New York was questioned as part of the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s death and the broader security failures surrounding his incarceration. The interview began with investigators explicitly stating that the probe focused not only on Epstein’s death itself, but also “everything that surrounds that time,” including job performance failures and security breakdowns. The correctional officer agreed to a voluntary interview under oath and spent much of the early questioning outlining his career history, including prior work as a New York City probation officer, a brief stint with New York State corrections, and his transfer to MCC New York in 2013 after beginning his BOP career at Allenwood in Pennsylvania.<br /><br /><br />The deposition is another piece of the sprawling federal effort to reconstruct exactly what happened inside MCC New York before Jeffrey Epstein was found dead in his cell on August 10, 2019. Investigators were clearly trying to map out the staffing structure, chain of command, and personnel who were present during the chaotic period surrounding Epstein’s incarceration, including after his first alleged suicide attempt.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00111284.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00111284.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72141846</guid><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72141846/mccunnamedcooig8.mp3" length="9425023" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3345c946-72b5-4d20-91ce-eecf10c52116/3345c946-72b5-4d20-91ce-eecf10c52116.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3345c946-72b5-4d20-91ce-eecf10c52116/3345c946-72b5-4d20-91ce-eecf10c52116.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3345c946-72b5-4d20-91ce-eecf10c52116/3345c946-72b5-4d20-91ce-eecf10c52116.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In a sworn interview with DOJ Office of Inspector General investigators conducted on June 14, 2021, an unnamed lieutenant and former correctional officer from MCC New York was questioned as part of the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s death and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br /><br /><br />In a sworn interview with DOJ Office of Inspector General investigators conducted on June 14, 2021, an unnamed lieutenant and former correctional officer from MCC New York was questioned as part of the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s death and the broader security failures surrounding his incarceration. The interview began with investigators explicitly stating that the probe focused not only on Epstein’s death itself, but also “everything that surrounds that time,” including job performance failures and security breakdowns. The correctional officer agreed to a voluntary interview under oath and spent much of the early questioning outlining his career history, including prior work as a New York City probation officer, a brief stint with New York State corrections, and his transfer to MCC New York in 2013 after beginning his BOP career at Allenwood in Pennsylvania.<br /><br /><br />The deposition is another piece of the sprawling federal effort to reconstruct exactly what happened inside MCC New York before Jeffrey Epstein was found dead in his cell on August 10, 2019. Investigators were clearly trying to map out the staffing structure, chain of command, and personnel who were present during the chaotic period surrounding Epstein’s incarceration, including after his first alleged suicide attempt.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00111284.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00111284.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>590</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Inside The OIG Interview:  The Testimony Of An Unnamed CO/Lieutenant (Part 7) (5/24/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/inside-the-oig-interview-the-testimony-of-an-unnamed-co-lieutenant-part-7-5-24-26--72140876</link><description><![CDATA[<br /><br /><br />In a sworn interview with DOJ Office of Inspector General investigators conducted on June 14, 2021, an unnamed lieutenant and former correctional officer from MCC New York was questioned as part of the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s death and the broader security failures surrounding his incarceration. The interview began with investigators explicitly stating that the probe focused not only on Epstein’s death itself, but also “everything that surrounds that time,” including job performance failures and security breakdowns. The correctional officer agreed to a voluntary interview under oath and spent much of the early questioning outlining his career history, including prior work as a New York City probation officer, a brief stint with New York State corrections, and his transfer to MCC New York in 2013 after beginning his BOP career at Allenwood in Pennsylvania.<br /><br /><br />The deposition is another piece of the sprawling federal effort to reconstruct exactly what happened inside MCC New York before Jeffrey Epstein was found dead in his cell on August 10, 2019. Investigators were clearly trying to map out the staffing structure, chain of command, and personnel who were present during the chaotic period surrounding Epstein’s incarceration, including after his first alleged suicide attempt.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00111284.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00111284.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72140876</guid><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72140876/mccunnamedcooig7.mp3" length="11057990" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/490ecee7-93e8-4d3e-8153-7cf69a5ea639/490ecee7-93e8-4d3e-8153-7cf69a5ea639.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/490ecee7-93e8-4d3e-8153-7cf69a5ea639/490ecee7-93e8-4d3e-8153-7cf69a5ea639.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/490ecee7-93e8-4d3e-8153-7cf69a5ea639/490ecee7-93e8-4d3e-8153-7cf69a5ea639.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In a sworn interview with DOJ Office of Inspector General investigators conducted on June 14, 2021, an unnamed lieutenant and former correctional officer from MCC New York was questioned as part of the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s death and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br /><br /><br />In a sworn interview with DOJ Office of Inspector General investigators conducted on June 14, 2021, an unnamed lieutenant and former correctional officer from MCC New York was questioned as part of the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s death and the broader security failures surrounding his incarceration. The interview began with investigators explicitly stating that the probe focused not only on Epstein’s death itself, but also “everything that surrounds that time,” including job performance failures and security breakdowns. The correctional officer agreed to a voluntary interview under oath and spent much of the early questioning outlining his career history, including prior work as a New York City probation officer, a brief stint with New York State corrections, and his transfer to MCC New York in 2013 after beginning his BOP career at Allenwood in Pennsylvania.<br /><br /><br />The deposition is another piece of the sprawling federal effort to reconstruct exactly what happened inside MCC New York before Jeffrey Epstein was found dead in his cell on August 10, 2019. Investigators were clearly trying to map out the staffing structure, chain of command, and personnel who were present during the chaotic period surrounding Epstein’s incarceration, including after his first alleged suicide attempt.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00111284.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00111284.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>692</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Inside The OIG Interview:  The Testimony Of An Unnamed CO/Lieutenant (Part 6) (5/24/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/inside-the-oig-interview-the-testimony-of-an-unnamed-co-lieutenant-part-6-5-24-26--72140875</link><description><![CDATA[<br /><br /><br />In a sworn interview with DOJ Office of Inspector General investigators conducted on June 14, 2021, an unnamed lieutenant and former correctional officer from MCC New York was questioned as part of the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s death and the broader security failures surrounding his incarceration. The interview began with investigators explicitly stating that the probe focused not only on Epstein’s death itself, but also “everything that surrounds that time,” including job performance failures and security breakdowns. The correctional officer agreed to a voluntary interview under oath and spent much of the early questioning outlining his career history, including prior work as a New York City probation officer, a brief stint with New York State corrections, and his transfer to MCC New York in 2013 after beginning his BOP career at Allenwood in Pennsylvania.<br /><br /><br />The deposition is another piece of the sprawling federal effort to reconstruct exactly what happened inside MCC New York before Jeffrey Epstein was found dead in his cell on August 10, 2019. Investigators were clearly trying to map out the staffing structure, chain of command, and personnel who were present during the chaotic period surrounding Epstein’s incarceration, including after his first alleged suicide attempt.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00111284.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00111284.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72140875</guid><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 18:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72140875/mccunnamedcooig6.mp3" length="11765595" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/64648c35-ec47-4e9e-86f2-c02bd56e235e/64648c35-ec47-4e9e-86f2-c02bd56e235e.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/64648c35-ec47-4e9e-86f2-c02bd56e235e/64648c35-ec47-4e9e-86f2-c02bd56e235e.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/64648c35-ec47-4e9e-86f2-c02bd56e235e/64648c35-ec47-4e9e-86f2-c02bd56e235e.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In a sworn interview with DOJ Office of Inspector General investigators conducted on June 14, 2021, an unnamed lieutenant and former correctional officer from MCC New York was questioned as part of the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s death and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br /><br /><br />In a sworn interview with DOJ Office of Inspector General investigators conducted on June 14, 2021, an unnamed lieutenant and former correctional officer from MCC New York was questioned as part of the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s death and the broader security failures surrounding his incarceration. The interview began with investigators explicitly stating that the probe focused not only on Epstein’s death itself, but also “everything that surrounds that time,” including job performance failures and security breakdowns. The correctional officer agreed to a voluntary interview under oath and spent much of the early questioning outlining his career history, including prior work as a New York City probation officer, a brief stint with New York State corrections, and his transfer to MCC New York in 2013 after beginning his BOP career at Allenwood in Pennsylvania.<br /><br /><br />The deposition is another piece of the sprawling federal effort to reconstruct exactly what happened inside MCC New York before Jeffrey Epstein was found dead in his cell on August 10, 2019. Investigators were clearly trying to map out the staffing structure, chain of command, and personnel who were present during the chaotic period surrounding Epstein’s incarceration, including after his first alleged suicide attempt.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00111284.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00111284.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>736</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Inside The OIG Interview:  The Testimony Of An Unnamed CO/Lieutenant (Part 5) (5/24/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/inside-the-oig-interview-the-testimony-of-an-unnamed-co-lieutenant-part-5-5-24-26--72140874</link><description><![CDATA[<br /><br /><br />In a sworn interview with DOJ Office of Inspector General investigators conducted on June 14, 2021, an unnamed lieutenant and former correctional officer from MCC New York was questioned as part of the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s death and the broader security failures surrounding his incarceration. The interview began with investigators explicitly stating that the probe focused not only on Epstein’s death itself, but also “everything that surrounds that time,” including job performance failures and security breakdowns. The correctional officer agreed to a voluntary interview under oath and spent much of the early questioning outlining his career history, including prior work as a New York City probation officer, a brief stint with New York State corrections, and his transfer to MCC New York in 2013 after beginning his BOP career at Allenwood in Pennsylvania.<br /><br /><br />The deposition is another piece of the sprawling federal effort to reconstruct exactly what happened inside MCC New York before Jeffrey Epstein was found dead in his cell on August 10, 2019. Investigators were clearly trying to map out the staffing structure, chain of command, and personnel who were present during the chaotic period surrounding Epstein’s incarceration, including after his first alleged suicide attempt.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00111284.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00111284.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72140874</guid><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72140874/mccunnamedcooig5.mp3" length="13056253" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/bd269ef1-2e13-4ff7-8d03-149bb15c28dc/bd269ef1-2e13-4ff7-8d03-149bb15c28dc.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/bd269ef1-2e13-4ff7-8d03-149bb15c28dc/bd269ef1-2e13-4ff7-8d03-149bb15c28dc.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/bd269ef1-2e13-4ff7-8d03-149bb15c28dc/bd269ef1-2e13-4ff7-8d03-149bb15c28dc.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In a sworn interview with DOJ Office of Inspector General investigators conducted on June 14, 2021, an unnamed lieutenant and former correctional officer from MCC New York was questioned as part of the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s death and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br /><br /><br />In a sworn interview with DOJ Office of Inspector General investigators conducted on June 14, 2021, an unnamed lieutenant and former correctional officer from MCC New York was questioned as part of the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s death and the broader security failures surrounding his incarceration. The interview began with investigators explicitly stating that the probe focused not only on Epstein’s death itself, but also “everything that surrounds that time,” including job performance failures and security breakdowns. The correctional officer agreed to a voluntary interview under oath and spent much of the early questioning outlining his career history, including prior work as a New York City probation officer, a brief stint with New York State corrections, and his transfer to MCC New York in 2013 after beginning his BOP career at Allenwood in Pennsylvania.<br /><br /><br />The deposition is another piece of the sprawling federal effort to reconstruct exactly what happened inside MCC New York before Jeffrey Epstein was found dead in his cell on August 10, 2019. Investigators were clearly trying to map out the staffing structure, chain of command, and personnel who were present during the chaotic period surrounding Epstein’s incarceration, including after his first alleged suicide attempt.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00111284.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00111284.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>816</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Jeffrey Epstein And His Catwalk To Hell (Part 4-5) (5/24/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-his-catwalk-to-hell-part-4-5-5-24-26--72132027</link><description><![CDATA[Maritza Vazquez, who worked as a bookkeeper for MC2 Model Management, provided critical testimony placing Jean‑Luc Brunel and Jeffrey Epstein at the center of a carefully managed system of underage recruitment and abuse. In her deposition, she identified Brunel as a regular passenger on Epstein’s private jet and noted that Epstein often traveled with girls recruited through MC2—some as young as 14. Vazquez testified that flight logs deliberately omitted the names of some female passengers, suggesting efforts to conceal underage trafficking. She recounted Brunel’s active role in sourcing vulnerable girls from abroad and introducing them into Epstein’s orbit, effectively operating as a global trafficking coordinator.<br /><br />Vazquez further corroborated that Epstein frequently displayed controlling behavior: he referred to Brunel’s recruits as inventory rather than people, casually discussing having “slept with over a thousand of Brunel’s girls,” according to court documents. Her detailed bookkeeping records and firsthand accounts of scheduling, money flow, and logistics provided prosecutors with evidence of a pipeline feeding Epstein’s sex ring. The deposition exposed how MC2 transactions and Brunel’s agency served as the administrative and logistical backbone for Epstein’s exploitation operation.<br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/25966082-maritza-vasquez-deposition-ocrmypdf/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Maritza Vasquez Deposition - Discussing Jeffrey Epstein, Jean-Luc Brunel, Donald Trump | DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72132027</guid><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72132027/megacatwalkhell4n5.mp3" length="32438692" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/90b4ea04-ecf5-4d03-b6de-dd7daebbf19d/90b4ea04-ecf5-4d03-b6de-dd7daebbf19d.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/90b4ea04-ecf5-4d03-b6de-dd7daebbf19d/90b4ea04-ecf5-4d03-b6de-dd7daebbf19d.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/90b4ea04-ecf5-4d03-b6de-dd7daebbf19d/90b4ea04-ecf5-4d03-b6de-dd7daebbf19d.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Maritza Vazquez, who worked as a bookkeeper for MC2 Model Management, provided critical testimony placing Jean‑Luc Brunel and Jeffrey Epstein at the center of a carefully managed system of underage recruitment and abuse. In her deposition, she...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Maritza Vazquez, who worked as a bookkeeper for MC2 Model Management, provided critical testimony placing Jean‑Luc Brunel and Jeffrey Epstein at the center of a carefully managed system of underage recruitment and abuse. In her deposition, she identified Brunel as a regular passenger on Epstein’s private jet and noted that Epstein often traveled with girls recruited through MC2—some as young as 14. Vazquez testified that flight logs deliberately omitted the names of some female passengers, suggesting efforts to conceal underage trafficking. She recounted Brunel’s active role in sourcing vulnerable girls from abroad and introducing them into Epstein’s orbit, effectively operating as a global trafficking coordinator.<br /><br />Vazquez further corroborated that Epstein frequently displayed controlling behavior: he referred to Brunel’s recruits as inventory rather than people, casually discussing having “slept with over a thousand of Brunel’s girls,” according to court documents. Her detailed bookkeeping records and firsthand accounts of scheduling, money flow, and logistics provided prosecutors with evidence of a pipeline feeding Epstein’s sex ring. The deposition exposed how MC2 transactions and Brunel’s agency served as the administrative and logistical backbone for Epstein’s exploitation operation.<br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/25966082-maritza-vasquez-deposition-ocrmypdf/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Maritza Vasquez Deposition - Discussing Jeffrey Epstein, Jean-Luc Brunel, Donald Trump | DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2028</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Jeffrey Epstein And His Catwalk To Hell (Part 1-3) (5/24/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-his-catwalk-to-hell-part-1-3-5-24-26--72132029</link><description><![CDATA[Maritza Vazquez, who worked as a bookkeeper for MC2 Model Management, provided critical testimony placing Jean‑Luc Brunel and Jeffrey Epstein at the center of a carefully managed system of underage recruitment and abuse. In her deposition, she identified Brunel as a regular passenger on Epstein’s private jet and noted that Epstein often traveled with girls recruited through MC2—some as young as 14. Vazquez testified that flight logs deliberately omitted the names of some female passengers, suggesting efforts to conceal underage trafficking. She recounted Brunel’s active role in sourcing vulnerable girls from abroad and introducing them into Epstein’s orbit, effectively operating as a global trafficking coordinator.<br /><br />Vazquez further corroborated that Epstein frequently displayed controlling behavior: he referred to Brunel’s recruits as inventory rather than people, casually discussing having “slept with over a thousand of Brunel’s girls,” according to court documents. Her detailed bookkeeping records and firsthand accounts of scheduling, money flow, and logistics provided prosecutors with evidence of a pipeline feeding Epstein’s sex ring. The deposition exposed how MC2 transactions and Brunel’s agency served as the administrative and logistical backbone for Epstein’s exploitation operation.<br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/25966082-maritza-vasquez-deposition-ocrmypdf/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Maritza Vasquez Deposition - Discussing Jeffrey Epstein, Jean-Luc Brunel, Donald Trump | DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72132029</guid><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72132029/megacatwalktohell1n2n3.mp3" length="38501608" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/fc9f7b62-588f-4bdb-97b9-311d559fc539/fc9f7b62-588f-4bdb-97b9-311d559fc539.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/fc9f7b62-588f-4bdb-97b9-311d559fc539/fc9f7b62-588f-4bdb-97b9-311d559fc539.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/fc9f7b62-588f-4bdb-97b9-311d559fc539/fc9f7b62-588f-4bdb-97b9-311d559fc539.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Maritza Vazquez, who worked as a bookkeeper for MC2 Model Management, provided critical testimony placing Jean‑Luc Brunel and Jeffrey Epstein at the center of a carefully managed system of underage recruitment and abuse. In her deposition, she...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Maritza Vazquez, who worked as a bookkeeper for MC2 Model Management, provided critical testimony placing Jean‑Luc Brunel and Jeffrey Epstein at the center of a carefully managed system of underage recruitment and abuse. In her deposition, she identified Brunel as a regular passenger on Epstein’s private jet and noted that Epstein often traveled with girls recruited through MC2—some as young as 14. Vazquez testified that flight logs deliberately omitted the names of some female passengers, suggesting efforts to conceal underage trafficking. She recounted Brunel’s active role in sourcing vulnerable girls from abroad and introducing them into Epstein’s orbit, effectively operating as a global trafficking coordinator.<br /><br />Vazquez further corroborated that Epstein frequently displayed controlling behavior: he referred to Brunel’s recruits as inventory rather than people, casually discussing having “slept with over a thousand of Brunel’s girls,” according to court documents. Her detailed bookkeeping records and firsthand accounts of scheduling, money flow, and logistics provided prosecutors with evidence of a pipeline feeding Epstein’s sex ring. The deposition exposed how MC2 transactions and Brunel’s agency served as the administrative and logistical backbone for Epstein’s exploitation operation.<br /><br /><br />to  contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/25966082-maritza-vasquez-deposition-ocrmypdf/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Maritza Vasquez Deposition - Discussing Jeffrey Epstein, Jean-Luc Brunel, Donald Trump | DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2407</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   The New York Times Exposes The Relationship Between Leon Black And Epstein (5/24/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-new-york-times-exposes-the-relationship-between-leon-black-and-epstein-5-24-26--72132028</link><description><![CDATA[Leon Black’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein extended well beyond conventional financial advising and into deeply personal territory that raises serious questions about the nature of their association. Epstein was not only handling tax and estate matters for Black, but also acting as an intermediary in arranging and directing large payments to multiple women, some of whom had personal or sexual relationships with Black. These payments, totaling tens of millions of dollars, were facilitated through Epstein’s network, suggesting a level of involvement that blurred any clear line between professional services and private dealings. The scope and structure of these transactions have drawn renewed scrutiny to why Epstein remained so closely tied to Black even after his 2008 conviction.<br /><br /><br />The details paint a broader picture of Epstein operating as a behind-the-scenes fixer for powerful clients, managing sensitive situations that extended far beyond finance. In Black’s case, that included discreetly coordinating payments and navigating complicated personal arrangements in a way that relied heavily on Epstein’s connections and secrecy. Black has continued to assert that his dealings with Epstein were legitimate and financially focused, but the depth of Epstein’s role in personal matters complicates that claim and reinforces concerns about how Epstein maintained influence among elite figures long after his criminal conduct was widely known..<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/23/business/jeffrey-epstein-leon-black.html?searchResultPosition=1&amp;unlocked_article_code=1.VVA.Humw.7CVAJIFnEaTx" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">How Epstein Helped Solve a Billionaire’s Problems With Women - The New York Times</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72132028</guid><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72132028/megafullextentleonepstein.mp3" length="51015306" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6792dee9-25be-44ae-bf71-c896cee937a4/6792dee9-25be-44ae-bf71-c896cee937a4.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6792dee9-25be-44ae-bf71-c896cee937a4/6792dee9-25be-44ae-bf71-c896cee937a4.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/6792dee9-25be-44ae-bf71-c896cee937a4/6792dee9-25be-44ae-bf71-c896cee937a4.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Leon Black’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein extended well beyond conventional financial advising and into deeply personal territory that raises serious questions about the nature of their association. Epstein was not only handling tax and estate...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Leon Black’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein extended well beyond conventional financial advising and into deeply personal territory that raises serious questions about the nature of their association. Epstein was not only handling tax and estate matters for Black, but also acting as an intermediary in arranging and directing large payments to multiple women, some of whom had personal or sexual relationships with Black. These payments, totaling tens of millions of dollars, were facilitated through Epstein’s network, suggesting a level of involvement that blurred any clear line between professional services and private dealings. The scope and structure of these transactions have drawn renewed scrutiny to why Epstein remained so closely tied to Black even after his 2008 conviction.<br /><br /><br />The details paint a broader picture of Epstein operating as a behind-the-scenes fixer for powerful clients, managing sensitive situations that extended far beyond finance. In Black’s case, that included discreetly coordinating payments and navigating complicated personal arrangements in a way that relied heavily on Epstein’s connections and secrecy. Black has continued to assert that his dealings with Epstein were legitimate and financially focused, but the depth of Epstein’s role in personal matters complicates that claim and reinforces concerns about how Epstein maintained influence among elite figures long after his criminal conduct was widely known..<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/23/business/jeffrey-epstein-leon-black.html?searchResultPosition=1&amp;unlocked_article_code=1.VVA.Humw.7CVAJIFnEaTx" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">How Epstein Helped Solve a Billionaire’s Problems With Women - The New York Times</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3189</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  The United States Government And The Self Inflicted Epstein Problem (5/24/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-united-states-government-and-the-self-inflicted-epstein-problem-5-24-26--72132039</link><description><![CDATA[<br />The DOJ’s Epstein failures compounded because each bad decision created the conditions for the next one. The original Florida investigation had the ingredients for a sweeping federal trafficking case: multiple victims, recruiters, properties, travel records, money trails, and a network of people who helped keep Epstein’s operation functioning. Instead, the case was narrowed, softened, and pushed into the disastrous 2008 non-prosecution agreement, which allowed Epstein to plead to state charges while potential co-conspirators received extraordinary protection. That decision did not simply mishandle one prosecution; it froze the larger case in place, cut victims out of the process, and gave the people around Epstein years to scatter, lawyer up, destroy records, reshape their stories, and continue living under the shield of federal ambiguity. Once the DOJ chose containment over exposure, every later attempt to revisit Epstein’s world had to fight through the damage created by that first act of institutional surrender.<br /><br /><br />By the time Epstein was arrested again in 2019, the department was no longer just trying to prosecute a predator; it was trying to outrun its own history. The Bureau of Prisons then turned that credibility crisis into a catastrophe when Epstein died in federal custody under conditions marked by staffing failures, supervision failures, camera questions, falsified records, and basic institutional breakdown. After his death, the failures shifted again into the realm of transparency: slow document releases, heavy redactions, fights over grand jury material, inconsistent explanations, and a recurring sense that the public and survivors were still being managed rather than fully informed. The result is a layered collapse of trust. First the DOJ failed to fully prosecute the network, then it failed to keep Epstein alive for trial, then it failed to convincingly explain the death, and then it failed to provide the level of transparency necessary to repair the damage. Each phase made the next phase harder to believe, which is why the Epstein case now reads less like a single prosecutorial failure and more like a decades-long institutional breakdown.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72132039</guid><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 08:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72132039/megepsteingovernmentfailure.mp3" length="40551279" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/514bf8e6-e05b-4ba1-b64e-b47d574b2ae2/514bf8e6-e05b-4ba1-b64e-b47d574b2ae2.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/514bf8e6-e05b-4ba1-b64e-b47d574b2ae2/514bf8e6-e05b-4ba1-b64e-b47d574b2ae2.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/514bf8e6-e05b-4ba1-b64e-b47d574b2ae2/514bf8e6-e05b-4ba1-b64e-b47d574b2ae2.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The DOJ’s Epstein failures compounded because each bad decision created the conditions for the next one. The original Florida investigation had the ingredients for a sweeping federal trafficking case: multiple victims, recruiters, properties, travel...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br />The DOJ’s Epstein failures compounded because each bad decision created the conditions for the next one. The original Florida investigation had the ingredients for a sweeping federal trafficking case: multiple victims, recruiters, properties, travel records, money trails, and a network of people who helped keep Epstein’s operation functioning. Instead, the case was narrowed, softened, and pushed into the disastrous 2008 non-prosecution agreement, which allowed Epstein to plead to state charges while potential co-conspirators received extraordinary protection. That decision did not simply mishandle one prosecution; it froze the larger case in place, cut victims out of the process, and gave the people around Epstein years to scatter, lawyer up, destroy records, reshape their stories, and continue living under the shield of federal ambiguity. Once the DOJ chose containment over exposure, every later attempt to revisit Epstein’s world had to fight through the damage created by that first act of institutional surrender.<br /><br /><br />By the time Epstein was arrested again in 2019, the department was no longer just trying to prosecute a predator; it was trying to outrun its own history. The Bureau of Prisons then turned that credibility crisis into a catastrophe when Epstein died in federal custody under conditions marked by staffing failures, supervision failures, camera questions, falsified records, and basic institutional breakdown. After his death, the failures shifted again into the realm of transparency: slow document releases, heavy redactions, fights over grand jury material, inconsistent explanations, and a recurring sense that the public and survivors were still being managed rather than fully informed. The result is a layered collapse of trust. First the DOJ failed to fully prosecute the network, then it failed to keep Epstein alive for trial, then it failed to convincingly explain the death, and then it failed to provide the level of transparency necessary to repair the damage. Each phase made the next phase harder to believe, which is why the Epstein case now reads less like a single prosecutorial failure and more like a decades-long institutional breakdown.<br /><br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2535</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:  Mark Middelton And Jeffrey Epstein's Passport To The Clinton White House (5/23/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-mark-middelton-and-jeffrey-epstein-s-passport-to-the-clinton-white-house-5-23-26--72132025</link><description><![CDATA[<br /><br /><br />Mark Middleton was a former special assistant to President Bill Clinton and a longtime Arkansas businessman whose name resurfaced repeatedly in connection with Jeffrey Epstein because of his role in helping facilitate access between Epstein and powerful political circles during the 1990s. Middleton worked in the Clinton White House during the administration’s early years and later became the subject of scrutiny after visitor logs showed he helped arrange multiple White House visits for Epstein. One of the most discussed details was Middleton’s role in introducing Epstein to senior administration officials and influential figures tied to science, finance, and politics. Epstein, who at the time was cultivating an image as a wealthy financier and philanthropist, used relationships like these to deepen his legitimacy and expand his social network among elite institutions. Middleton’s connections to both Arkansas political circles and national Democratic fundraising networks made him a valuable bridge for Epstein as he sought influence far beyond Wall Street and Palm Beach.<br /><br /><br />Interest in Middleton intensified years later after renewed public scrutiny of the Clinton-Epstein relationship and the release of White House visitor records showing Epstein visited the White House multiple times during the Clinton years. Middleton himself largely avoided public discussion of the matter and denied wrongdoing, but his role continued to attract attention because he appeared to have been one of the earliest high-level political gatekeepers to help Epstein move comfortably inside elite Washington circles. Questions surrounding Middleton became even more pronounced after his 2022 death, which authorities ruled a suicide, though the circumstances quickly fueled speculation online due to the already heightened public obsession surrounding Epstein’s network and political associations. While there has never been evidence that Middleton was accused of participating in Epstein’s criminal conduct, his documented role in helping connect Epstein to powerful institutions and influential individuals has kept his name firmly embedded in discussions about how Epstein gained access to some of the most powerful people in America.<br /><br /><br /><br />to ocntact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72132025</guid><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 06:30:01 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72132025/megamarkmiddletondeath.mp3" length="53716606" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4e0dcb0c-146d-43d4-9757-426d87f3b0ba/4e0dcb0c-146d-43d4-9757-426d87f3b0ba.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4e0dcb0c-146d-43d4-9757-426d87f3b0ba/4e0dcb0c-146d-43d4-9757-426d87f3b0ba.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/4e0dcb0c-146d-43d4-9757-426d87f3b0ba/4e0dcb0c-146d-43d4-9757-426d87f3b0ba.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Mark Middleton was a former special assistant to President Bill Clinton and a longtime Arkansas businessman whose name resurfaced repeatedly in connection with Jeffrey Epstein because of his role in helping facilitate access between Epstein and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br /><br /><br />Mark Middleton was a former special assistant to President Bill Clinton and a longtime Arkansas businessman whose name resurfaced repeatedly in connection with Jeffrey Epstein because of his role in helping facilitate access between Epstein and powerful political circles during the 1990s. Middleton worked in the Clinton White House during the administration’s early years and later became the subject of scrutiny after visitor logs showed he helped arrange multiple White House visits for Epstein. One of the most discussed details was Middleton’s role in introducing Epstein to senior administration officials and influential figures tied to science, finance, and politics. Epstein, who at the time was cultivating an image as a wealthy financier and philanthropist, used relationships like these to deepen his legitimacy and expand his social network among elite institutions. Middleton’s connections to both Arkansas political circles and national Democratic fundraising networks made him a valuable bridge for Epstein as he sought influence far beyond Wall Street and Palm Beach.<br /><br /><br />Interest in Middleton intensified years later after renewed public scrutiny of the Clinton-Epstein relationship and the release of White House visitor records showing Epstein visited the White House multiple times during the Clinton years. Middleton himself largely avoided public discussion of the matter and denied wrongdoing, but his role continued to attract attention because he appeared to have been one of the earliest high-level political gatekeepers to help Epstein move comfortably inside elite Washington circles. Questions surrounding Middleton became even more pronounced after his 2022 death, which authorities ruled a suicide, though the circumstances quickly fueled speculation online due to the already heightened public obsession surrounding Epstein’s network and political associations. While there has never been evidence that Middleton was accused of participating in Epstein’s criminal conduct, his documented role in helping connect Epstein to powerful institutions and influential individuals has kept his name firmly embedded in discussions about how Epstein gained access to some of the most powerful people in America.<br /><br /><br /><br />to ocntact me:<br /><br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3358</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Ghislaine Maxwell And The Deposition That Led To Her Downfall (Part 20)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/ghislaine-maxwell-and-the-deposition-that-led-to-her-downfall-part-20--72070673</link><description><![CDATA[In a videotaped deposition taken in April 2016, Maxwell was questioned under oath about Giuffre’s allegations of being groomed and trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell—allegations that she vehemently denied, calling Giuffre an “absolute liar” and asserting she had no involvement in recruiting or abusing her. Maxwell repeatedly refused to answer questions about alleged sexual activity with minors—labeling them as inquiries into “consensual adult sex”—and insisted she had no knowledge of underage abuse. She denied any wrongdoing or participation in Epstein’s trafficking network, attempting to distance herself from all aspects of Giuffre’s claims.<br /><br />Critics and federal prosecutors later pointed to this deposition as a key piece of evidence in her criminal indictment: they argue Maxwell knowingly made false statements under oath, which became the basis for two counts of perjury in her 2021 criminal charges. Despite her denials, corroborating evidence—including testimony about threesomes with minor girls, flight logs, and recruitment patterns—cast serious doubt on her credibility. Giuffre’s suit was ultimately settled in 2017, reportedly for millions of dollars, but the unsealed deposition—and Maxwell’s fierce denials—now serve as a stark contrast to the weight of testimony and documentation later vetted in court.<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/7274476-Ghislaine-Maxwell-Deposition-Transcript" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ghislaine Maxwell Deposition Transcript - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72070673</guid><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72070673/maxdepoprt20_2.mp3" length="14729761" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ac4ffa5e-2e48-4c8f-b39a-06768064c8a5/ac4ffa5e-2e48-4c8f-b39a-06768064c8a5.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ac4ffa5e-2e48-4c8f-b39a-06768064c8a5/ac4ffa5e-2e48-4c8f-b39a-06768064c8a5.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/ac4ffa5e-2e48-4c8f-b39a-06768064c8a5/ac4ffa5e-2e48-4c8f-b39a-06768064c8a5.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In a videotaped deposition taken in April 2016, Maxwell was questioned under oath about Giuffre’s allegations of being groomed and trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell—allegations that she vehemently denied, calling Giuffre an “absolute liar” and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In a videotaped deposition taken in April 2016, Maxwell was questioned under oath about Giuffre’s allegations of being groomed and trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell—allegations that she vehemently denied, calling Giuffre an “absolute liar” and asserting she had no involvement in recruiting or abusing her. Maxwell repeatedly refused to answer questions about alleged sexual activity with minors—labeling them as inquiries into “consensual adult sex”—and insisted she had no knowledge of underage abuse. She denied any wrongdoing or participation in Epstein’s trafficking network, attempting to distance herself from all aspects of Giuffre’s claims.<br /><br />Critics and federal prosecutors later pointed to this deposition as a key piece of evidence in her criminal indictment: they argue Maxwell knowingly made false statements under oath, which became the basis for two counts of perjury in her 2021 criminal charges. Despite her denials, corroborating evidence—including testimony about threesomes with minor girls, flight logs, and recruitment patterns—cast serious doubt on her credibility. Giuffre’s suit was ultimately settled in 2017, reportedly for millions of dollars, but the unsealed deposition—and Maxwell’s fierce denials—now serve as a stark contrast to the weight of testimony and documentation later vetted in court.<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/7274476-Ghislaine-Maxwell-Deposition-Transcript" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ghislaine Maxwell Deposition Transcript - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>921</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>billgates,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epstein,epsteinisland,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,ghislainemaxwellupdates,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinnews,jeffreyepsteinnewsupdates,maxwellnewsupdates,news,newsupdate,princeandrew,princeandrewnews,theyallknew,truecrime,truecrimenewsreport</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Ghislaine Maxwell And The Deposition That Led To Her Downfall (Part 19)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/ghislaine-maxwell-and-the-deposition-that-led-to-her-downfall-part-19--72070672</link><description><![CDATA[In a videotaped deposition taken in April 2016, Maxwell was questioned under oath about Giuffre’s allegations of being groomed and trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell—allegations that she vehemently denied, calling Giuffre an “absolute liar” and asserting she had no involvement in recruiting or abusing her. Maxwell repeatedly refused to answer questions about alleged sexual activity with minors—labeling them as inquiries into “consensual adult sex”—and insisted she had no knowledge of underage abuse. She denied any wrongdoing or participation in Epstein’s trafficking network, attempting to distance herself from all aspects of Giuffre’s claims.<br /><br />Critics and federal prosecutors later pointed to this deposition as a key piece of evidence in her criminal indictment: they argue Maxwell knowingly made false statements under oath, which became the basis for two counts of perjury in her 2021 criminal charges. Despite her denials, corroborating evidence—including testimony about threesomes with minor girls, flight logs, and recruitment patterns—cast serious doubt on her credibility. Giuffre’s suit was ultimately settled in 2017, reportedly for millions of dollars, but the unsealed deposition—and Maxwell’s fierce denials—now serve as a stark contrast to the weight of testimony and documentation later vetted in court.<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/7274476-Ghislaine-Maxwell-Deposition-Transcript" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ghislaine Maxwell Deposition Transcript - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72070672</guid><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72070672/maxdepoprt19.mp3" length="15862012" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e1f53133-c441-408e-a429-7618b9135146/e1f53133-c441-408e-a429-7618b9135146.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e1f53133-c441-408e-a429-7618b9135146/e1f53133-c441-408e-a429-7618b9135146.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/e1f53133-c441-408e-a429-7618b9135146/e1f53133-c441-408e-a429-7618b9135146.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In a videotaped deposition taken in April 2016, Maxwell was questioned under oath about Giuffre’s allegations of being groomed and trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell—allegations that she vehemently denied, calling Giuffre an “absolute liar” and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In a videotaped deposition taken in April 2016, Maxwell was questioned under oath about Giuffre’s allegations of being groomed and trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell—allegations that she vehemently denied, calling Giuffre an “absolute liar” and asserting she had no involvement in recruiting or abusing her. Maxwell repeatedly refused to answer questions about alleged sexual activity with minors—labeling them as inquiries into “consensual adult sex”—and insisted she had no knowledge of underage abuse. She denied any wrongdoing or participation in Epstein’s trafficking network, attempting to distance herself from all aspects of Giuffre’s claims.<br /><br />Critics and federal prosecutors later pointed to this deposition as a key piece of evidence in her criminal indictment: they argue Maxwell knowingly made false statements under oath, which became the basis for two counts of perjury in her 2021 criminal charges. Despite her denials, corroborating evidence—including testimony about threesomes with minor girls, flight logs, and recruitment patterns—cast serious doubt on her credibility. Giuffre’s suit was ultimately settled in 2017, reportedly for millions of dollars, but the unsealed deposition—and Maxwell’s fierce denials—now serve as a stark contrast to the weight of testimony and documentation later vetted in court.<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/7274476-Ghislaine-Maxwell-Deposition-Transcript" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ghislaine Maxwell Deposition Transcript - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>992</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>billgates,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epstein,epsteinisland,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,ghislainemaxwellupdates,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinnews,jeffreyepsteinnewsupdates,maxwellnewsupdates,news,newsupdate,princeandrew,princeandrewnews,theyallknew,truecrime,truecrimenewsreport</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Ghislaine Maxwell And The Deposition That Led To Her Downfall (Part 18)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/ghislaine-maxwell-and-the-deposition-that-led-to-her-downfall-part-18--72070670</link><description><![CDATA[In a videotaped deposition taken in April 2016, Maxwell was questioned under oath about Giuffre’s allegations of being groomed and trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell—allegations that she vehemently denied, calling Giuffre an “absolute liar” and asserting she had no involvement in recruiting or abusing her. Maxwell repeatedly refused to answer questions about alleged sexual activity with minors—labeling them as inquiries into “consensual adult sex”—and insisted she had no knowledge of underage abuse. She denied any wrongdoing or participation in Epstein’s trafficking network, attempting to distance herself from all aspects of Giuffre’s claims.<br /><br />Critics and federal prosecutors later pointed to this deposition as a key piece of evidence in her criminal indictment: they argue Maxwell knowingly made false statements under oath, which became the basis for two counts of perjury in her 2021 criminal charges. Despite her denials, corroborating evidence—including testimony about threesomes with minor girls, flight logs, and recruitment patterns—cast serious doubt on her credibility. Giuffre’s suit was ultimately settled in 2017, reportedly for millions of dollars, but the unsealed deposition—and Maxwell’s fierce denials—now serve as a stark contrast to the weight of testimony and documentation later vetted in court.<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/7274476-Ghislaine-Maxwell-Deposition-Transcript" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ghislaine Maxwell Deposition Transcript - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72070670</guid><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72070670/maxdepoprt18.mp3" length="13002335" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9f3e6876-ed43-4373-8cf5-a271a69e458a/9f3e6876-ed43-4373-8cf5-a271a69e458a.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9f3e6876-ed43-4373-8cf5-a271a69e458a/9f3e6876-ed43-4373-8cf5-a271a69e458a.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/9f3e6876-ed43-4373-8cf5-a271a69e458a/9f3e6876-ed43-4373-8cf5-a271a69e458a.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In a videotaped deposition taken in April 2016, Maxwell was questioned under oath about Giuffre’s allegations of being groomed and trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell—allegations that she vehemently denied, calling Giuffre an “absolute liar” and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In a videotaped deposition taken in April 2016, Maxwell was questioned under oath about Giuffre’s allegations of being groomed and trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell—allegations that she vehemently denied, calling Giuffre an “absolute liar” and asserting she had no involvement in recruiting or abusing her. Maxwell repeatedly refused to answer questions about alleged sexual activity with minors—labeling them as inquiries into “consensual adult sex”—and insisted she had no knowledge of underage abuse. She denied any wrongdoing or participation in Epstein’s trafficking network, attempting to distance herself from all aspects of Giuffre’s claims.<br /><br />Critics and federal prosecutors later pointed to this deposition as a key piece of evidence in her criminal indictment: they argue Maxwell knowingly made false statements under oath, which became the basis for two counts of perjury in her 2021 criminal charges. Despite her denials, corroborating evidence—including testimony about threesomes with minor girls, flight logs, and recruitment patterns—cast serious doubt on her credibility. Giuffre’s suit was ultimately settled in 2017, reportedly for millions of dollars, but the unsealed deposition—and Maxwell’s fierce denials—now serve as a stark contrast to the weight of testimony and documentation later vetted in court.<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/7274476-Ghislaine-Maxwell-Deposition-Transcript" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ghislaine Maxwell Deposition Transcript - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>813</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>billgates,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epstein,epsteinisland,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,ghislainemaxwellupdates,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinnews,jeffreyepsteinnewsupdates,maxwellnewsupdates,news,newsupdate,princeandrew,princeandrewnews,theyallknew,truecrime,truecrimenewsreport</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Ghislaine Maxwell And The Deposition That Led To Her Downfall (Part 17)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/ghislaine-maxwell-and-the-deposition-that-led-to-her-downfall-part-17--72070674</link><description><![CDATA[In a videotaped deposition taken in April 2016, Maxwell was questioned under oath about Giuffre’s allegations of being groomed and trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell—allegations that she vehemently denied, calling Giuffre an “absolute liar” and asserting she had no involvement in recruiting or abusing her. Maxwell repeatedly refused to answer questions about alleged sexual activity with minors—labeling them as inquiries into “consensual adult sex”—and insisted she had no knowledge of underage abuse. She denied any wrongdoing or participation in Epstein’s trafficking network, attempting to distance herself from all aspects of Giuffre’s claims.<br /><br />Critics and federal prosecutors later pointed to this deposition as a key piece of evidence in her criminal indictment: they argue Maxwell knowingly made false statements under oath, which became the basis for two counts of perjury in her 2021 criminal charges. Despite her denials, corroborating evidence—including testimony about threesomes with minor girls, flight logs, and recruitment patterns—cast serious doubt on her credibility. Giuffre’s suit was ultimately settled in 2017, reportedly for millions of dollars, but the unsealed deposition—and Maxwell’s fierce denials—now serve as a stark contrast to the weight of testimony and documentation later vetted in court.<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/7274476-Ghislaine-Maxwell-Deposition-Transcript" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ghislaine Maxwell Deposition Transcript - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72070674</guid><pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72070674/maxdepoprt17.mp3" length="18268621" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3a203981-e784-4672-abbc-57f428fa0eff/3a203981-e784-4672-abbc-57f428fa0eff.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3a203981-e784-4672-abbc-57f428fa0eff/3a203981-e784-4672-abbc-57f428fa0eff.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3a203981-e784-4672-abbc-57f428fa0eff/3a203981-e784-4672-abbc-57f428fa0eff.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In a videotaped deposition taken in April 2016, Maxwell was questioned under oath about Giuffre’s allegations of being groomed and trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell—allegations that she vehemently denied, calling Giuffre an “absolute liar” and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In a videotaped deposition taken in April 2016, Maxwell was questioned under oath about Giuffre’s allegations of being groomed and trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell—allegations that she vehemently denied, calling Giuffre an “absolute liar” and asserting she had no involvement in recruiting or abusing her. Maxwell repeatedly refused to answer questions about alleged sexual activity with minors—labeling them as inquiries into “consensual adult sex”—and insisted she had no knowledge of underage abuse. She denied any wrongdoing or participation in Epstein’s trafficking network, attempting to distance herself from all aspects of Giuffre’s claims.<br /><br />Critics and federal prosecutors later pointed to this deposition as a key piece of evidence in her criminal indictment: they argue Maxwell knowingly made false statements under oath, which became the basis for two counts of perjury in her 2021 criminal charges. Despite her denials, corroborating evidence—including testimony about threesomes with minor girls, flight logs, and recruitment patterns—cast serious doubt on her credibility. Giuffre’s suit was ultimately settled in 2017, reportedly for millions of dollars, but the unsealed deposition—and Maxwell’s fierce denials—now serve as a stark contrast to the weight of testimony and documentation later vetted in court.<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/7274476-Ghislaine-Maxwell-Deposition-Transcript" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ghislaine Maxwell Deposition Transcript - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1142</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>billgates,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epstein,epsteinisland,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,ghislainemaxwellupdates,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinnews,jeffreyepsteinnewsupdates,maxwellnewsupdates,news,newsupdate,princeandrew,princeandrewnews,theyallknew,truecrime,truecrimenewsreport</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Inside The OIG Interview:  The Testimony Of An Unnamed CO/Lieutenant (Part 4) (5/23/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/inside-the-oig-interview-the-testimony-of-an-unnamed-co-lieutenant-part-4-5-23-26--72131718</link><description><![CDATA[<br /><br /><br />In a sworn interview with DOJ Office of Inspector General investigators conducted on June 14, 2021, an unnamed lieutenant and former correctional officer from MCC New York was questioned as part of the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s death and the broader security failures surrounding his incarceration. The interview began with investigators explicitly stating that the probe focused not only on Epstein’s death itself, but also “everything that surrounds that time,” including job performance failures and security breakdowns. The correctional officer agreed to a voluntary interview under oath and spent much of the early questioning outlining his career history, including prior work as a New York City probation officer, a brief stint with New York State corrections, and his transfer to MCC New York in 2013 after beginning his BOP career at Allenwood in Pennsylvania.<br /><br /><br />The deposition is another piece of the sprawling federal effort to reconstruct exactly what happened inside MCC New York before Jeffrey Epstein was found dead in his cell on August 10, 2019. Investigators were clearly trying to map out the staffing structure, chain of command, and personnel who were present during the chaotic period surrounding Epstein’s incarceration, including after his first alleged suicide attempt.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00111284.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00111284.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72131718</guid><pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 20:30:05 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72131718/mccunnamedcooig4.mp3" length="10902091" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7787d29f-ece4-4ced-ab75-d7815f0df4c4/7787d29f-ece4-4ced-ab75-d7815f0df4c4.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7787d29f-ece4-4ced-ab75-d7815f0df4c4/7787d29f-ece4-4ced-ab75-d7815f0df4c4.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/7787d29f-ece4-4ced-ab75-d7815f0df4c4/7787d29f-ece4-4ced-ab75-d7815f0df4c4.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In a sworn interview with DOJ Office of Inspector General investigators conducted on June 14, 2021, an unnamed lieutenant and former correctional officer from MCC New York was questioned as part of the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s death and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br /><br /><br />In a sworn interview with DOJ Office of Inspector General investigators conducted on June 14, 2021, an unnamed lieutenant and former correctional officer from MCC New York was questioned as part of the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s death and the broader security failures surrounding his incarceration. The interview began with investigators explicitly stating that the probe focused not only on Epstein’s death itself, but also “everything that surrounds that time,” including job performance failures and security breakdowns. The correctional officer agreed to a voluntary interview under oath and spent much of the early questioning outlining his career history, including prior work as a New York City probation officer, a brief stint with New York State corrections, and his transfer to MCC New York in 2013 after beginning his BOP career at Allenwood in Pennsylvania.<br /><br /><br />The deposition is another piece of the sprawling federal effort to reconstruct exactly what happened inside MCC New York before Jeffrey Epstein was found dead in his cell on August 10, 2019. Investigators were clearly trying to map out the staffing structure, chain of command, and personnel who were present during the chaotic period surrounding Epstein’s incarceration, including after his first alleged suicide attempt.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00111284.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00111284.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>682</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Inside The OIG Interview:  The Testimony Of An Unnamed CO/Lieutenant (Part 3) (5/23/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/inside-the-oig-interview-the-testimony-of-an-unnamed-co-lieutenant-part-3-5-23-26--72131716</link><description><![CDATA[<br /><br /><br />In a sworn interview with DOJ Office of Inspector General investigators conducted on June 14, 2021, an unnamed lieutenant and former correctional officer from MCC New York was questioned as part of the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s death and the broader security failures surrounding his incarceration. The interview began with investigators explicitly stating that the probe focused not only on Epstein’s death itself, but also “everything that surrounds that time,” including job performance failures and security breakdowns. The correctional officer agreed to a voluntary interview under oath and spent much of the early questioning outlining his career history, including prior work as a New York City probation officer, a brief stint with New York State corrections, and his transfer to MCC New York in 2013 after beginning his BOP career at Allenwood in Pennsylvania.<br /><br /><br />The deposition is another piece of the sprawling federal effort to reconstruct exactly what happened inside MCC New York before Jeffrey Epstein was found dead in his cell on August 10, 2019. Investigators were clearly trying to map out the staffing structure, chain of command, and personnel who were present during the chaotic period surrounding Epstein’s incarceration, including after his first alleged suicide attempt.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00111284.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00111284.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72131716</guid><pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 18:30:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72131716/mccunnamedcooig3.mp3" length="13610048" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/92b1b9ff-319e-4b5d-9066-e8fd8c5157ee/92b1b9ff-319e-4b5d-9066-e8fd8c5157ee.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/92b1b9ff-319e-4b5d-9066-e8fd8c5157ee/92b1b9ff-319e-4b5d-9066-e8fd8c5157ee.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/92b1b9ff-319e-4b5d-9066-e8fd8c5157ee/92b1b9ff-319e-4b5d-9066-e8fd8c5157ee.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In a sworn interview with DOJ Office of Inspector General investigators conducted on June 14, 2021, an unnamed lieutenant and former correctional officer from MCC New York was questioned as part of the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s death and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br /><br /><br />In a sworn interview with DOJ Office of Inspector General investigators conducted on June 14, 2021, an unnamed lieutenant and former correctional officer from MCC New York was questioned as part of the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s death and the broader security failures surrounding his incarceration. The interview began with investigators explicitly stating that the probe focused not only on Epstein’s death itself, but also “everything that surrounds that time,” including job performance failures and security breakdowns. The correctional officer agreed to a voluntary interview under oath and spent much of the early questioning outlining his career history, including prior work as a New York City probation officer, a brief stint with New York State corrections, and his transfer to MCC New York in 2013 after beginning his BOP career at Allenwood in Pennsylvania.<br /><br /><br />The deposition is another piece of the sprawling federal effort to reconstruct exactly what happened inside MCC New York before Jeffrey Epstein was found dead in his cell on August 10, 2019. Investigators were clearly trying to map out the staffing structure, chain of command, and personnel who were present during the chaotic period surrounding Epstein’s incarceration, including after his first alleged suicide attempt.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00111284.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00111284.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>851</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Inside The OIG Interview:  The Testimony Of An Unnamed CO/Lieutenant (Part 2) (5/23/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/inside-the-oig-interview-the-testimony-of-an-unnamed-co-lieutenant-part-2-5-23-26--72131714</link><description><![CDATA[<br /><br /><br />In a sworn interview with DOJ Office of Inspector General investigators conducted on June 14, 2021, an unnamed lieutenant and former correctional officer from MCC New York was questioned as part of the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s death and the broader security failures surrounding his incarceration. The interview began with investigators explicitly stating that the probe focused not only on Epstein’s death itself, but also “everything that surrounds that time,” including job performance failures and security breakdowns. The correctional officer agreed to a voluntary interview under oath and spent much of the early questioning outlining his career history, including prior work as a New York City probation officer, a brief stint with New York State corrections, and his transfer to MCC New York in 2013 after beginning his BOP career at Allenwood in Pennsylvania.<br /><br /><br />The deposition is another piece of the sprawling federal effort to reconstruct exactly what happened inside MCC New York before Jeffrey Epstein was found dead in his cell on August 10, 2019. Investigators were clearly trying to map out the staffing structure, chain of command, and personnel who were present during the chaotic period surrounding Epstein’s incarceration, including after his first alleged suicide attempt.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00111284.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00111284.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72131714</guid><pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 16:30:06 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72131714/mccunnamedcooig2.mp3" length="12430568" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0dd5fc3d-83f9-4165-9af4-3192c1951c3b/0dd5fc3d-83f9-4165-9af4-3192c1951c3b.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0dd5fc3d-83f9-4165-9af4-3192c1951c3b/0dd5fc3d-83f9-4165-9af4-3192c1951c3b.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0dd5fc3d-83f9-4165-9af4-3192c1951c3b/0dd5fc3d-83f9-4165-9af4-3192c1951c3b.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In a sworn interview with DOJ Office of Inspector General investigators conducted on June 14, 2021, an unnamed lieutenant and former correctional officer from MCC New York was questioned as part of the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s death and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<br /><br /><br />In a sworn interview with DOJ Office of Inspector General investigators conducted on June 14, 2021, an unnamed lieutenant and former correctional officer from MCC New York was questioned as part of the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s death and the broader security failures surrounding his incarceration. The interview began with investigators explicitly stating that the probe focused not only on Epstein’s death itself, but also “everything that surrounds that time,” including job performance failures and security breakdowns. The correctional officer agreed to a voluntary interview under oath and spent much of the early questioning outlining his career history, including prior work as a New York City probation officer, a brief stint with New York State corrections, and his transfer to MCC New York in 2013 after beginning his BOP career at Allenwood in Pennsylvania.<br /><br /><br />The deposition is another piece of the sprawling federal effort to reconstruct exactly what happened inside MCC New York before Jeffrey Epstein was found dead in his cell on August 10, 2019. Investigators were clearly trying to map out the staffing structure, chain of command, and personnel who were present during the chaotic period surrounding Epstein’s incarceration, including after his first alleged suicide attempt.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00111284.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00111284.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>777</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   Tova Noel’s Account of the Morning Jeffrey Epstein Died (Part 23-25) (5/23/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-tova-noel-s-account-of-the-morning-jeffrey-epstein-died-part-23-25-5-23-26--72115840</link><description><![CDATA[During the Office of Inspector General investigation into the death of Jeffrey Epstein at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in August 2019, correctional officer Tova Noel gave an interview describing how the morning unfolded when Epstein was discovered in his cell. According to her account, she and fellow officer Michael Thomas were assigned to monitor the Special Housing Unit overnight. Noel told investigators that when breakfast rounds began that morning, Thomas approached Epstein’s cell and noticed something was wrong. She said Thomas called out for assistance and that she moved toward the area, where Epstein was found hanging from a strip of bedding tied to the top bunk. Noel stated that Thomas entered the cell first and attempted to cut the ligature while she retrieved equipment to assist, after which they lowered Epstein to the floor so CPR could begin.<br /><br />However, the OIG investigation was highly critical of Noel’s conduct and the credibility of the circumstances she described. Investigators determined that Noel and Thomas had failed to perform the legally required inmate counts and physical security checks for hours during the night Epstein died, leaving him unmonitored in a high-risk suicide watch environment. The report also found that Noel later signed official count sheets falsely indicating that the checks had been completed, despite evidence showing they had not been. Surveillance records and other evidence suggested the officers spent large portions of the shift away from their assigned duties, and investigators concluded that their negligence created the conditions that allowed Epstein to remain unattended long enough to die. As a result, Noel’s interview with OIG was viewed less as a clear explanation of events and more as part of a broader record showing severe procedural failures and falsified documentation at the very time Epstein required the highest level of supervision.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00117759.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00117759.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72115840</guid><pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72115840/megatova23n24n25.mp3" length="39273578" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/22c50c47-de5b-473d-9b64-609a057bf4f3/22c50c47-de5b-473d-9b64-609a057bf4f3.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/22c50c47-de5b-473d-9b64-609a057bf4f3/22c50c47-de5b-473d-9b64-609a057bf4f3.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/22c50c47-de5b-473d-9b64-609a057bf4f3/22c50c47-de5b-473d-9b64-609a057bf4f3.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>During the Office of Inspector General investigation into the death of Jeffrey Epstein at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in August 2019, correctional officer Tova Noel gave an interview describing how the morning unfolded when Epstein was...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[During the Office of Inspector General investigation into the death of Jeffrey Epstein at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in August 2019, correctional officer Tova Noel gave an interview describing how the morning unfolded when Epstein was discovered in his cell. According to her account, she and fellow officer Michael Thomas were assigned to monitor the Special Housing Unit overnight. Noel told investigators that when breakfast rounds began that morning, Thomas approached Epstein’s cell and noticed something was wrong. She said Thomas called out for assistance and that she moved toward the area, where Epstein was found hanging from a strip of bedding tied to the top bunk. Noel stated that Thomas entered the cell first and attempted to cut the ligature while she retrieved equipment to assist, after which they lowered Epstein to the floor so CPR could begin.<br /><br />However, the OIG investigation was highly critical of Noel’s conduct and the credibility of the circumstances she described. Investigators determined that Noel and Thomas had failed to perform the legally required inmate counts and physical security checks for hours during the night Epstein died, leaving him unmonitored in a high-risk suicide watch environment. The report also found that Noel later signed official count sheets falsely indicating that the checks had been completed, despite evidence showing they had not been. Surveillance records and other evidence suggested the officers spent large portions of the shift away from their assigned duties, and investigators concluded that their negligence created the conditions that allowed Epstein to remain unattended long enough to die. As a result, Noel’s interview with OIG was viewed less as a clear explanation of events and more as part of a broader record showing severe procedural failures and falsified documentation at the very time Epstein required the highest level of supervision.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00117759.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00117759.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2455</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   Tova Noel’s Account of the Morning Jeffrey Epstein Died (Part 20-22) (5/23/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-tova-noel-s-account-of-the-morning-jeffrey-epstein-died-part-20-22-5-23-26--72115841</link><description><![CDATA[During the Office of Inspector General investigation into the death of Jeffrey Epstein at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in August 2019, correctional officer Tova Noel gave an interview describing how the morning unfolded when Epstein was discovered in his cell. According to her account, she and fellow officer Michael Thomas were assigned to monitor the Special Housing Unit overnight. Noel told investigators that when breakfast rounds began that morning, Thomas approached Epstein’s cell and noticed something was wrong. She said Thomas called out for assistance and that she moved toward the area, where Epstein was found hanging from a strip of bedding tied to the top bunk. Noel stated that Thomas entered the cell first and attempted to cut the ligature while she retrieved equipment to assist, after which they lowered Epstein to the floor so CPR could begin.<br /><br />However, the OIG investigation was highly critical of Noel’s conduct and the credibility of the circumstances she described. Investigators determined that Noel and Thomas had failed to perform the legally required inmate counts and physical security checks for hours during the night Epstein died, leaving him unmonitored in a high-risk suicide watch environment. The report also found that Noel later signed official count sheets falsely indicating that the checks had been completed, despite evidence showing they had not been. Surveillance records and other evidence suggested the officers spent large portions of the shift away from their assigned duties, and investigators concluded that their negligence created the conditions that allowed Epstein to remain unattended long enough to die. As a result, Noel’s interview with OIG was viewed less as a clear explanation of events and more as part of a broader record showing severe procedural failures and falsified documentation at the very time Epstein required the highest level of supervision.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00117759.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00117759.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72115841</guid><pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 12:35:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72115841/megatovaoig20n21n22.mp3" length="41230463" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3c8f523a-b297-4fb5-a178-cadc1112ca42/3c8f523a-b297-4fb5-a178-cadc1112ca42.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3c8f523a-b297-4fb5-a178-cadc1112ca42/3c8f523a-b297-4fb5-a178-cadc1112ca42.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/3c8f523a-b297-4fb5-a178-cadc1112ca42/3c8f523a-b297-4fb5-a178-cadc1112ca42.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>During the Office of Inspector General investigation into the death of Jeffrey Epstein at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in August 2019, correctional officer Tova Noel gave an interview describing how the morning unfolded when Epstein was...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[During the Office of Inspector General investigation into the death of Jeffrey Epstein at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in August 2019, correctional officer Tova Noel gave an interview describing how the morning unfolded when Epstein was discovered in his cell. According to her account, she and fellow officer Michael Thomas were assigned to monitor the Special Housing Unit overnight. Noel told investigators that when breakfast rounds began that morning, Thomas approached Epstein’s cell and noticed something was wrong. She said Thomas called out for assistance and that she moved toward the area, where Epstein was found hanging from a strip of bedding tied to the top bunk. Noel stated that Thomas entered the cell first and attempted to cut the ligature while she retrieved equipment to assist, after which they lowered Epstein to the floor so CPR could begin.<br /><br />However, the OIG investigation was highly critical of Noel’s conduct and the credibility of the circumstances she described. Investigators determined that Noel and Thomas had failed to perform the legally required inmate counts and physical security checks for hours during the night Epstein died, leaving him unmonitored in a high-risk suicide watch environment. The report also found that Noel later signed official count sheets falsely indicating that the checks had been completed, despite evidence showing they had not been. Surveillance records and other evidence suggested the officers spent large portions of the shift away from their assigned duties, and investigators concluded that their negligence created the conditions that allowed Epstein to remain unattended long enough to die. As a result, Noel’s interview with OIG was viewed less as a clear explanation of events and more as part of a broader record showing severe procedural failures and falsified documentation at the very time Epstein required the highest level of supervision.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00117759.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00117759.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2577</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   Tova Noel’s Account of the Morning Jeffrey Epstein Died (Part 17-19) (5/22/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-tova-noel-s-account-of-the-morning-jeffrey-epstein-died-part-17-19-5-22-26--72115835</link><description><![CDATA[During the Office of Inspector General investigation into the death of Jeffrey Epstein at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in August 2019, correctional officer Tova Noel gave an interview describing how the morning unfolded when Epstein was discovered in his cell. According to her account, she and fellow officer Michael Thomas were assigned to monitor the Special Housing Unit overnight. Noel told investigators that when breakfast rounds began that morning, Thomas approached Epstein’s cell and noticed something was wrong. She said Thomas called out for assistance and that she moved toward the area, where Epstein was found hanging from a strip of bedding tied to the top bunk. Noel stated that Thomas entered the cell first and attempted to cut the ligature while she retrieved equipment to assist, after which they lowered Epstein to the floor so CPR could begin.<br /><br />However, the OIG investigation was highly critical of Noel’s conduct and the credibility of the circumstances she described. Investigators determined that Noel and Thomas had failed to perform the legally required inmate counts and physical security checks for hours during the night Epstein died, leaving him unmonitored in a high-risk suicide watch environment. The report also found that Noel later signed official count sheets falsely indicating that the checks had been completed, despite evidence showing they had not been. Surveillance records and other evidence suggested the officers spent large portions of the shift away from their assigned duties, and investigators concluded that their negligence created the conditions that allowed Epstein to remain unattended long enough to die. As a result, Noel’s interview with OIG was viewed less as a clear explanation of events and more as part of a broader record showing severe procedural failures and falsified documentation at the very time Epstein required the highest level of supervision.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00117759.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00117759.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72115835</guid><pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 10:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72115835/megatovaoig17n18n19.mp3" length="37786062" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/338fa2ff-9504-4e3e-8a59-2a783ebd67b8/338fa2ff-9504-4e3e-8a59-2a783ebd67b8.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/338fa2ff-9504-4e3e-8a59-2a783ebd67b8/338fa2ff-9504-4e3e-8a59-2a783ebd67b8.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/338fa2ff-9504-4e3e-8a59-2a783ebd67b8/338fa2ff-9504-4e3e-8a59-2a783ebd67b8.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>During the Office of Inspector General investigation into the death of Jeffrey Epstein at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in August 2019, correctional officer Tova Noel gave an interview describing how the morning unfolded when Epstein was...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[During the Office of Inspector General investigation into the death of Jeffrey Epstein at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in August 2019, correctional officer Tova Noel gave an interview describing how the morning unfolded when Epstein was discovered in his cell. According to her account, she and fellow officer Michael Thomas were assigned to monitor the Special Housing Unit overnight. Noel told investigators that when breakfast rounds began that morning, Thomas approached Epstein’s cell and noticed something was wrong. She said Thomas called out for assistance and that she moved toward the area, where Epstein was found hanging from a strip of bedding tied to the top bunk. Noel stated that Thomas entered the cell first and attempted to cut the ligature while she retrieved equipment to assist, after which they lowered Epstein to the floor so CPR could begin.<br /><br />However, the OIG investigation was highly critical of Noel’s conduct and the credibility of the circumstances she described. Investigators determined that Noel and Thomas had failed to perform the legally required inmate counts and physical security checks for hours during the night Epstein died, leaving him unmonitored in a high-risk suicide watch environment. The report also found that Noel later signed official count sheets falsely indicating that the checks had been completed, despite evidence showing they had not been. Surveillance records and other evidence suggested the officers spent large portions of the shift away from their assigned duties, and investigators concluded that their negligence created the conditions that allowed Epstein to remain unattended long enough to die. As a result, Noel’s interview with OIG was viewed less as a clear explanation of events and more as part of a broader record showing severe procedural failures and falsified documentation at the very time Epstein required the highest level of supervision.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00117759.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00117759.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2362</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   Tova Noel’s Account of the Morning Jeffrey Epstein Died (Part 14-16) (5/23/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-tova-noel-s-account-of-the-morning-jeffrey-epstein-died-part-14-16-5-23-26--72115836</link><description><![CDATA[During the Office of Inspector General investigation into the death of Jeffrey Epstein at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in August 2019, correctional officer Tova Noel gave an interview describing how the morning unfolded when Epstein was discovered in his cell. According to her account, she and fellow officer Michael Thomas were assigned to monitor the Special Housing Unit overnight. Noel told investigators that when breakfast rounds began that morning, Thomas approached Epstein’s cell and noticed something was wrong. She said Thomas called out for assistance and that she moved toward the area, where Epstein was found hanging from a strip of bedding tied to the top bunk. Noel stated that Thomas entered the cell first and attempted to cut the ligature while she retrieved equipment to assist, after which they lowered Epstein to the floor so CPR could begin.<br /><br />However, the OIG investigation was highly critical of Noel’s conduct and the credibility of the circumstances she described. Investigators determined that Noel and Thomas had failed to perform the legally required inmate counts and physical security checks for hours during the night Epstein died, leaving him unmonitored in a high-risk suicide watch environment. The report also found that Noel later signed official count sheets falsely indicating that the checks had been completed, despite evidence showing they had not been. Surveillance records and other evidence suggested the officers spent large portions of the shift away from their assigned duties, and investigators concluded that their negligence created the conditions that allowed Epstein to remain unattended long enough to die. As a result, Noel’s interview with OIG was viewed less as a clear explanation of events and more as part of a broader record showing severe procedural failures and falsified documentation at the very time Epstein required the highest level of supervision.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00117759.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00117759.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72115836</guid><pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 08:30:09 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72115836/megatovaoig14n15n16.mp3" length="41885823" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/baa172d0-209d-4478-a035-22eaa709bff4/baa172d0-209d-4478-a035-22eaa709bff4.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/baa172d0-209d-4478-a035-22eaa709bff4/baa172d0-209d-4478-a035-22eaa709bff4.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/baa172d0-209d-4478-a035-22eaa709bff4/baa172d0-209d-4478-a035-22eaa709bff4.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>During the Office of Inspector General investigation into the death of Jeffrey Epstein at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in August 2019, correctional officer Tova Noel gave an interview describing how the morning unfolded when Epstein was...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[During the Office of Inspector General investigation into the death of Jeffrey Epstein at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in August 2019, correctional officer Tova Noel gave an interview describing how the morning unfolded when Epstein was discovered in his cell. According to her account, she and fellow officer Michael Thomas were assigned to monitor the Special Housing Unit overnight. Noel told investigators that when breakfast rounds began that morning, Thomas approached Epstein’s cell and noticed something was wrong. She said Thomas called out for assistance and that she moved toward the area, where Epstein was found hanging from a strip of bedding tied to the top bunk. Noel stated that Thomas entered the cell first and attempted to cut the ligature while she retrieved equipment to assist, after which they lowered Epstein to the floor so CPR could begin.<br /><br />However, the OIG investigation was highly critical of Noel’s conduct and the credibility of the circumstances she described. Investigators determined that Noel and Thomas had failed to perform the legally required inmate counts and physical security checks for hours during the night Epstein died, leaving him unmonitored in a high-risk suicide watch environment. The report also found that Noel later signed official count sheets falsely indicating that the checks had been completed, despite evidence showing they had not been. Surveillance records and other evidence suggested the officers spent large portions of the shift away from their assigned duties, and investigators concluded that their negligence created the conditions that allowed Epstein to remain unattended long enough to die. As a result, Noel’s interview with OIG was viewed less as a clear explanation of events and more as part of a broader record showing severe procedural failures and falsified documentation at the very time Epstein required the highest level of supervision.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00117759.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00117759.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2618</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mega Edition:   Tova Noel’s Account of the Morning Jeffrey Epstein Died (Part 11-13) (5/23/26)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-tova-noel-s-account-of-the-morning-jeffrey-epstein-died-part-11-13-5-23-26--72115837</link><description><![CDATA[During the Office of Inspector General investigation into the death of Jeffrey Epstein at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in August 2019, correctional officer Tova Noel gave an interview describing how the morning unfolded when Epstein was discovered in his cell. According to her account, she and fellow officer Michael Thomas were assigned to monitor the Special Housing Unit overnight. Noel told investigators that when breakfast rounds began that morning, Thomas approached Epstein’s cell and noticed something was wrong. She said Thomas called out for assistance and that she moved toward the area, where Epstein was found hanging from a strip of bedding tied to the top bunk. Noel stated that Thomas entered the cell first and attempted to cut the ligature while she retrieved equipment to assist, after which they lowered Epstein to the floor so CPR could begin.<br /><br />However, the OIG investigation was highly critical of Noel’s conduct and the credibility of the circumstances she described. Investigators determined that Noel and Thomas had failed to perform the legally required inmate counts and physical security checks for hours during the night Epstein died, leaving him unmonitored in a high-risk suicide watch environment. The report also found that Noel later signed official count sheets falsely indicating that the checks had been completed, despite evidence showing they had not been. Surveillance records and other evidence suggested the officers spent large portions of the shift away from their assigned duties, and investigators concluded that their negligence created the conditions that allowed Epstein to remain unattended long enough to die. As a result, Noel’s interview with OIG was viewed less as a clear explanation of events and more as part of a broader record showing severe procedural failures and falsified documentation at the very time Epstein required the highest level of supervision.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00117759.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00117759.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72115837</guid><pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72115837/megatovaoig11n12n13.mp3" length="38957601" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0f60feee-d629-4a8f-8edb-8861f9f450c7/0f60feee-d629-4a8f-8edb-8861f9f450c7.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0f60feee-d629-4a8f-8edb-8861f9f450c7/0f60feee-d629-4a8f-8edb-8861f9f450c7.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0f60feee-d629-4a8f-8edb-8861f9f450c7/0f60feee-d629-4a8f-8edb-8861f9f450c7.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>During the Office of Inspector General investigation into the death of Jeffrey Epstein at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in August 2019, correctional officer Tova Noel gave an interview describing how the morning unfolded when Epstein was...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[During the Office of Inspector General investigation into the death of Jeffrey Epstein at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in August 2019, correctional officer Tova Noel gave an interview describing how the morning unfolded when Epstein was discovered in his cell. According to her account, she and fellow officer Michael Thomas were assigned to monitor the Special Housing Unit overnight. Noel told investigators that when breakfast rounds began that morning, Thomas approached Epstein’s cell and noticed something was wrong. She said Thomas called out for assistance and that she moved toward the area, where Epstein was found hanging from a strip of bedding tied to the top bunk. Noel stated that Thomas entered the cell first and attempted to cut the ligature while she retrieved equipment to assist, after which they lowered Epstein to the floor so CPR could begin.<br /><br />However, the OIG investigation was highly critical of Noel’s conduct and the credibility of the circumstances she described. Investigators determined that Noel and Thomas had failed to perform the legally required inmate counts and physical security checks for hours during the night Epstein died, leaving him unmonitored in a high-risk suicide watch environment. The report also found that Noel later signed official count sheets falsely indicating that the checks had been completed, despite evidence showing they had not been. Surveillance records and other evidence suggested the officers spent large portions of the shift away from their assigned duties, and investigators concluded that their negligence created the conditions that allowed Epstein to remain unattended long enough to die. As a result, Noel’s interview with OIG was viewed less as a clear explanation of events and more as part of a broader record showing severe procedural failures and falsified documentation at the very time Epstein required the highest level of supervision.<br /><br /><br />to contact me:<br /><br />bobbycapucci@protonmail.com<br /><br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00117759.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EFTA00117759.pdf</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2435</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>andrew,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epsteinclientlist,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinlist,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinsisland,jeffreyepsteinupdates,maxwell,news,princeandrew,trump,trumpepsteincoverup,virginiagiuffre,virginiaroberts</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Ghislaine Maxwell And The Deposition That Led To Her Downfall (Part 16)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/ghislaine-maxwell-and-the-deposition-that-led-to-her-downfall-part-16--72070677</link><description><![CDATA[In a videotaped deposition taken in April 2016, Maxwell was questioned under oath about Giuffre’s allegations of being groomed and trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell—allegations that she vehemently denied, calling Giuffre an “absolute liar” and asserting she had no involvement in recruiting or abusing her. Maxwell repeatedly refused to answer questions about alleged sexual activity with minors—labeling them as inquiries into “consensual adult sex”—and insisted she had no knowledge of underage abuse. She denied any wrongdoing or participation in Epstein’s trafficking network, attempting to distance herself from all aspects of Giuffre’s claims.<br /><br />Critics and federal prosecutors later pointed to this deposition as a key piece of evidence in her criminal indictment: they argue Maxwell knowingly made false statements under oath, which became the basis for two counts of perjury in her 2021 criminal charges. Despite her denials, corroborating evidence—including testimony about threesomes with minor girls, flight logs, and recruitment patterns—cast serious doubt on her credibility. Giuffre’s suit was ultimately settled in 2017, reportedly for millions of dollars, but the unsealed deposition—and Maxwell’s fierce denials—now serve as a stark contrast to the weight of testimony and documentation later vetted in court.<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/7274476-Ghislaine-Maxwell-Deposition-Transcript" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ghislaine Maxwell Deposition Transcript - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72070677</guid><pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 04:30:05 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72070677/maxdepoprt16.mp3" length="17298955" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/24dad679-5828-4b78-a8f1-d19f9d9e4d32/24dad679-5828-4b78-a8f1-d19f9d9e4d32.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/24dad679-5828-4b78-a8f1-d19f9d9e4d32/24dad679-5828-4b78-a8f1-d19f9d9e4d32.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/24dad679-5828-4b78-a8f1-d19f9d9e4d32/24dad679-5828-4b78-a8f1-d19f9d9e4d32.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>Bobby Capucci</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In a videotaped deposition taken in April 2016, Maxwell was questioned under oath about Giuffre’s allegations of being groomed and trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell—allegations that she vehemently denied, calling Giuffre an “absolute liar” and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In a videotaped deposition taken in April 2016, Maxwell was questioned under oath about Giuffre’s allegations of being groomed and trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell—allegations that she vehemently denied, calling Giuffre an “absolute liar” and asserting she had no involvement in recruiting or abusing her. Maxwell repeatedly refused to answer questions about alleged sexual activity with minors—labeling them as inquiries into “consensual adult sex”—and insisted she had no knowledge of underage abuse. She denied any wrongdoing or participation in Epstein’s trafficking network, attempting to distance herself from all aspects of Giuffre’s claims.<br /><br />Critics and federal prosecutors later pointed to this deposition as a key piece of evidence in her criminal indictment: they argue Maxwell knowingly made false statements under oath, which became the basis for two counts of perjury in her 2021 criminal charges. Despite her denials, corroborating evidence—including testimony about threesomes with minor girls, flight logs, and recruitment patterns—cast serious doubt on her credibility. Giuffre’s suit was ultimately settled in 2017, reportedly for millions of dollars, but the unsealed deposition—and Maxwell’s fierce denials—now serve as a stark contrast to the weight of testimony and documentation later vetted in court.<br /><br /><br />source:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/7274476-Ghislaine-Maxwell-Deposition-Transcript" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ghislaine Maxwell Deposition Transcript - DocumentCloud</a><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1082</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>billgates,breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,epstein,epsteinisland,epsteinsisland,ghislainemaxwell,ghislainemaxwellupdates,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,jeffreyepsteinnews,jeffreyepsteinnewsupdates,maxwellnewsupdates,news,newsupdate,princeandrew,princeandrewnews,theyallknew,truecrime,truecrimenewsreport</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item></channel></rss>
