https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883
The city also has a thriving arts and culture scene, with several galleries, museums, and performance venues.In terms of recreation, Moscow has several parks and outdoor recreation areas, including the Latah Trail, the Moscow Mountain Trail System, and the Palouse Divide Nordic Ski Area. The city also hosts several annual events, including the Moscow Farmers Market, the Lionel Hampton Jazz Festival, and the Renaissance Fair.

However, things would change forever after Xana Kernodle, Ethan Chapin, Madison Mogen and Kaylee Goncalves were murdered in the early morning hours of November 13th, 2022.

What followed in the wake of the murders captivated not only the nation but the whole world as the authorities scrambled to find the person responsible for the heinous crime.

This podcast will document the Murders In Moscow from right after the murders were committed all the way through the real time evolution of the trial of the person that the authorities say is responsible, Bryan Kohberger.

We will also cover other stories that are based in the world of true crime that are currently in the courts or that are headed that way.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>enNews CommentaryBobby Capuccihttps://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/85a2c7fb3ddf19fac8a354e1e0ad41b8.jpghttps://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883Sat, 14 Nov 2026 17:20:03 +0000Bobby CapucciBobby Capuccibobbycapucci@protonmail.comMoscow is a city located in northern Idaho, United States, with a population of approximately 25,000 people. It is the largest city and the county seat of Latah County. The city is situated in the Palouse region, known for its fertile soil and rolling...
The city also has a thriving arts and culture scene, with several galleries, museums, and performance venues.In terms of recreation, Moscow has several parks and outdoor recreation areas, including the Latah Trail, the Moscow Mountain Trail System, and the Palouse Divide Nordic Ski Area. The city also hosts several annual events, including the Moscow Farmers Market, the Lionel Hampton Jazz Festival, and the Renaissance Fair.

However, things would change forever after Xana Kernodle, Ethan Chapin, Madison Mogen and Kaylee Goncalves were murdered in the early morning hours of November 13th, 2022.

What followed in the wake of the murders captivated not only the nation but the whole world as the authorities scrambled to find the person responsible for the heinous crime.

This podcast will document the Murders In Moscow from right after the murders were committed all the way through the real time evolution of the trial of the person that the authorities say is responsible, Bryan Kohberger.

We will also cover other stories that are based in the world of true crime that are currently in the courts or that are headed that way.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>true5332be0c-f457-5e28-9d9e-3f3e04598cd8episodicSupport the podcast!https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-warden-s-statement-detailing-the-death-of-jeffrey-epstein-part-17-20-11-14-26--76340900
Even more troubling is how his interview reflects a pattern of deflection that mirrors broader institutional behavior in the wake of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. N’Diaye pointed to correctional officers missing rounds, falsifying logs, and working under extreme fatigue, but failed to explain why those conditions were tolerated under his command, especially after Epstein had already been flagged as a high-risk inmate following a prior incident. The responsibility didn’t disappear into the system—it sat squarely in his office, and his testimony reads less like accountability and more like damage control. The overall picture is not of a warden overwhelmed by circumstances, but of a leader who allowed a known crisis environment to persist unchecked, then attempted to retroactively frame it as inevitable once the worst-case scenario unfolded.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

EFTA00119019.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76340900Sat, 14 Nov 2026 17:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciLamine N'Diaye, in his interview with the Office of the Inspector General, essentially tried to turn the Metropolitan Correctional Center into a scapegoat while positioning himself as a bystander to its failures. He leaned heavily on the narrative...
Even more troubling is how his interview reflects a pattern of deflection that mirrors broader institutional behavior in the wake of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. N’Diaye pointed to correctional officers missing rounds, falsifying logs, and working under extreme fatigue, but failed to explain why those conditions were tolerated under his command, especially after Epstein had already been flagged as a high-risk inmate following a prior incident. The responsibility didn’t disappear into the system—it sat squarely in his office, and his testimony reads less like accountability and more like damage control. The overall picture is not of a warden overwhelmed by circumstances, but of a leader who allowed a known crisis environment to persist unchecked, then attempted to retroactively frame it as inevitable once the worst-case scenario unfolded.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

EFTA00119019.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3535epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-warden-s-statement-detailing-the-death-of-jeffrey-epstein-part-14-16-11-14-26--76340902
Even more troubling is how his interview reflects a pattern of deflection that mirrors broader institutional behavior in the wake of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. N’Diaye pointed to correctional officers missing rounds, falsifying logs, and working under extreme fatigue, but failed to explain why those conditions were tolerated under his command, especially after Epstein had already been flagged as a high-risk inmate following a prior incident. The responsibility didn’t disappear into the system—it sat squarely in his office, and his testimony reads less like accountability and more like damage control. The overall picture is not of a warden overwhelmed by circumstances, but of a leader who allowed a known crisis environment to persist unchecked, then attempted to retroactively frame it as inevitable once the worst-case scenario unfolded.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

EFTA00119019.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76340902Sat, 14 Nov 2026 15:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciLamine N'Diaye, in his interview with the Office of the Inspector General, essentially tried to turn the Metropolitan Correctional Center into a scapegoat while positioning himself as a bystander to its failures. He leaned heavily on the narrative...
Even more troubling is how his interview reflects a pattern of deflection that mirrors broader institutional behavior in the wake of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. N’Diaye pointed to correctional officers missing rounds, falsifying logs, and working under extreme fatigue, but failed to explain why those conditions were tolerated under his command, especially after Epstein had already been flagged as a high-risk inmate following a prior incident. The responsibility didn’t disappear into the system—it sat squarely in his office, and his testimony reads less like accountability and more like damage control. The overall picture is not of a warden overwhelmed by circumstances, but of a leader who allowed a known crisis environment to persist unchecked, then attempted to retroactively frame it as inevitable once the worst-case scenario unfolded.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

EFTA00119019.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2522epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-warden-s-statement-detailing-the-death-of-jeffrey-epstein-part-11-13-11-14-26--76340898
Even more troubling is how his interview reflects a pattern of deflection that mirrors broader institutional behavior in the wake of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. N’Diaye pointed to correctional officers missing rounds, falsifying logs, and working under extreme fatigue, but failed to explain why those conditions were tolerated under his command, especially after Epstein had already been flagged as a high-risk inmate following a prior incident. The responsibility didn’t disappear into the system—it sat squarely in his office, and his testimony reads less like accountability and more like damage control. The overall picture is not of a warden overwhelmed by circumstances, but of a leader who allowed a known crisis environment to persist unchecked, then attempted to retroactively frame it as inevitable once the worst-case scenario unfolded.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

EFTA00119019.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76340898Sat, 14 Nov 2026 13:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciLamine N'Diaye, in his interview with the Office of the Inspector General, essentially tried to turn the Metropolitan Correctional Center into a scapegoat while positioning himself as a bystander to its failures. He leaned heavily on the narrative...
Even more troubling is how his interview reflects a pattern of deflection that mirrors broader institutional behavior in the wake of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. N’Diaye pointed to correctional officers missing rounds, falsifying logs, and working under extreme fatigue, but failed to explain why those conditions were tolerated under his command, especially after Epstein had already been flagged as a high-risk inmate following a prior incident. The responsibility didn’t disappear into the system—it sat squarely in his office, and his testimony reads less like accountability and more like damage control. The overall picture is not of a warden overwhelmed by circumstances, but of a leader who allowed a known crisis environment to persist unchecked, then attempted to retroactively frame it as inevitable once the worst-case scenario unfolded.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

EFTA00119019.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2618epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-warden-s-statement-detailing-the-death-of-jeffrey-epstein-part-8-10-11-14-26--76340901
Even more troubling is how his interview reflects a pattern of deflection that mirrors broader institutional behavior in the wake of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. N’Diaye pointed to correctional officers missing rounds, falsifying logs, and working under extreme fatigue, but failed to explain why those conditions were tolerated under his command, especially after Epstein had already been flagged as a high-risk inmate following a prior incident. The responsibility didn’t disappear into the system—it sat squarely in his office, and his testimony reads less like accountability and more like damage control. The overall picture is not of a warden overwhelmed by circumstances, but of a leader who allowed a known crisis environment to persist unchecked, then attempted to retroactively frame it as inevitable once the worst-case scenario unfolded.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

EFTA00119019.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76340901Sat, 14 Nov 2026 11:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciLamine N'Diaye, in his interview with the Office of the Inspector General, essentially tried to turn the Metropolitan Correctional Center into a scapegoat while positioning himself as a bystander to its failures. He leaned heavily on the narrative...
Even more troubling is how his interview reflects a pattern of deflection that mirrors broader institutional behavior in the wake of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. N’Diaye pointed to correctional officers missing rounds, falsifying logs, and working under extreme fatigue, but failed to explain why those conditions were tolerated under his command, especially after Epstein had already been flagged as a high-risk inmate following a prior incident. The responsibility didn’t disappear into the system—it sat squarely in his office, and his testimony reads less like accountability and more like damage control. The overall picture is not of a warden overwhelmed by circumstances, but of a leader who allowed a known crisis environment to persist unchecked, then attempted to retroactively frame it as inevitable once the worst-case scenario unfolded.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

EFTA00119019.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2656epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-warden-s-statement-detailing-the-death-of-jeffrey-epstein-part-5-7-11-14-26--76340897
Even more troubling is how his interview reflects a pattern of deflection that mirrors broader institutional behavior in the wake of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. N’Diaye pointed to correctional officers missing rounds, falsifying logs, and working under extreme fatigue, but failed to explain why those conditions were tolerated under his command, especially after Epstein had already been flagged as a high-risk inmate following a prior incident. The responsibility didn’t disappear into the system—it sat squarely in his office, and his testimony reads less like accountability and more like damage control. The overall picture is not of a warden overwhelmed by circumstances, but of a leader who allowed a known crisis environment to persist unchecked, then attempted to retroactively frame it as inevitable once the worst-case scenario unfolded.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

EFTA00119019.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76340897Sat, 14 Nov 2026 09:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciLamine N'Diaye, in his interview with the Office of the Inspector General, essentially tried to turn the Metropolitan Correctional Center into a scapegoat while positioning himself as a bystander to its failures. He leaned heavily on the narrative...
Even more troubling is how his interview reflects a pattern of deflection that mirrors broader institutional behavior in the wake of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. N’Diaye pointed to correctional officers missing rounds, falsifying logs, and working under extreme fatigue, but failed to explain why those conditions were tolerated under his command, especially after Epstein had already been flagged as a high-risk inmate following a prior incident. The responsibility didn’t disappear into the system—it sat squarely in his office, and his testimony reads less like accountability and more like damage control. The overall picture is not of a warden overwhelmed by circumstances, but of a leader who allowed a known crisis environment to persist unchecked, then attempted to retroactively frame it as inevitable once the worst-case scenario unfolded.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

EFTA00119019.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2686epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-warden-s-statement-detailing-the-death-of-jeffrey-epstein-part-1-4-11-14-26--76340899
Even more troubling is how his interview reflects a pattern of deflection that mirrors broader institutional behavior in the wake of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. N’Diaye pointed to correctional officers missing rounds, falsifying logs, and working under extreme fatigue, but failed to explain why those conditions were tolerated under his command, especially after Epstein had already been flagged as a high-risk inmate following a prior incident. The responsibility didn’t disappear into the system—it sat squarely in his office, and his testimony reads less like accountability and more like damage control. The overall picture is not of a warden overwhelmed by circumstances, but of a leader who allowed a known crisis environment to persist unchecked, then attempted to retroactively frame it as inevitable once the worst-case scenario unfolded.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

EFTA00119019.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76340899Sat, 14 Nov 2026 07:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciLamine N'Diaye, in his interview with the Office of the Inspector General, essentially tried to turn the Metropolitan Correctional Center into a scapegoat while positioning himself as a bystander to its failures. He leaned heavily on the narrative...
Even more troubling is how his interview reflects a pattern of deflection that mirrors broader institutional behavior in the wake of Jeffrey Epstein’s death. N’Diaye pointed to correctional officers missing rounds, falsifying logs, and working under extreme fatigue, but failed to explain why those conditions were tolerated under his command, especially after Epstein had already been flagged as a high-risk inmate following a prior incident. The responsibility didn’t disappear into the system—it sat squarely in his office, and his testimony reads less like accountability and more like damage control. The overall picture is not of a warden overwhelmed by circumstances, but of a leader who allowed a known crisis environment to persist unchecked, then attempted to retroactively frame it as inevitable once the worst-case scenario unfolded.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

EFTA00119019.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2985epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/operation-cartel-how-the-sinaloa-cartel-put-the-fentanyl-game-on-lock--76343173
The Sinaloa Cartel has been implicated in trading fentanyl for military-grade weapons with international contacts. Anastacio Soto Vega, a weapons expert for the cartel, traveled to Vienna, Austria, in December 2022 to inspect an array of military-grade weapons on behalf of the García Corrales brothers, key figures within the cartel. This visit was part of negotiations to exchange fentanyl for such weaponry. Soto Vega was later arrested in Athens, Greece, in March 2023 and faces charges in the United States related to fentanyl trafficking and possession of machine guns and destructive devices.

Further investigations have revealed that the Sinaloa Cartel has acquired European-made firearms, including Austrian Glocks, Belgian machine guns, and Italian handguns. These weapons have been used in various violent confrontations, such as the 2019 battle in Culiacán following the attempted arrest of Ovidio Guzmán, son of Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán. The cartel's ability to procure advanced weaponry from international sources underscores its extensive global network and the challenges authorities face in curbing its operations.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76343173Sat, 14 Nov 2026 05:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe Sinaloa Cartel has established itself as a primary producer and distributor of illicit fentanyl in the United States. Leveraging precursor chemicals sourced from China, the cartel synthesizes fentanyl in clandestine laboratories within Mexico....
The Sinaloa Cartel has been implicated in trading fentanyl for military-grade weapons with international contacts. Anastacio Soto Vega, a weapons expert for the cartel, traveled to Vienna, Austria, in December 2022 to inspect an array of military-grade weapons on behalf of the García Corrales brothers, key figures within the cartel. This visit was part of negotiations to exchange fentanyl for such weaponry. Soto Vega was later arrested in Athens, Greece, in March 2023 and faces charges in the United States related to fentanyl trafficking and possession of machine guns and destructive devices.

Further investigations have revealed that the Sinaloa Cartel has acquired European-made firearms, including Austrian Glocks, Belgian machine guns, and Italian handguns. These weapons have been used in various violent confrontations, such as the 2019 battle in Culiacán following the attempted arrest of Ovidio Guzmán, son of Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán. The cartel's ability to procure advanced weaponry from international sources underscores its extensive global network and the challenges authorities face in curbing its operations.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1752breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,cartel,cartelnews,chapitos,cjng,elchapo,elmayo,elmayozambada,jaliscocartel,loschapitos,mayitos,mexico,narcos,news,occ,organizedcrime,rico,sinaloacartel,zambadatruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-long-island-serial-killer-preyed-upon-vulnerable-women-for-a-reason--76343172
The bodies were found during the search for a missing woman named Shannan Gilbert, a sex worker who disappeared in May 2010. As the search progressed, additional remains and body parts were discovered in the area, ultimately totaling at least ten victims. The remains were found along a stretch of Ocean Parkway, leading to speculation that the killer may have been familiar with the area.The victims found at Gilgo Beach were mostly young women who had advertised their services on websites like Craigslist. Many of them had been strangled to death, and some had been dismembered.

The killer exhibited a pattern of targeting individuals involved in the sex trade, which led investigators to believe that he may have had knowledge or experience in law enforcement or another profession that allowed him to avoid suspicion.Over the years, several suspects have been considered, including individuals with connections to the area and potential links to law enforcement. However, no arrests have been made in connection with the Long Island Serial Killer case, and the killer's identity remains a mystery.

The case has garnered significant media attention and has sparked public interest and speculation, but the lack of substantial leads and evidence has hindered progress in the investigation.Law enforcement agencies, including the Suffolk County Police Department, have continued their efforts to solve the case. In recent years, new technological advancements and forensic techniques have been utilized to reexamine the evidence and potentially identify the killer.

Additionally, the case has prompted discussions about the safety of sex workers and the need for improved strategies to protect and support vulnerable individuals in society.The Long Island Serial Killer case stands as one of the most notorious unsolved serial murder cases in recent history. The hope for closure and justice for the victims and their families remains, as investigators persist in their pursuit of the killer and the truth behind these heinous crimes.





to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

Long Island Serial Killer ‘cherry-picked’ his ‘vulnerable’ Gilgo Beach murder victims for ‘personal’ reason, experts say | The US Sun (the-sun.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76343172Sat, 14 Nov 2026 03:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe Long Island Serial Killer, also known as the Gilgo Beach Killer or the Craigslist Ripper, is an unidentified serial killer who targeted individuals involved in the sex trade, particularly prostitutes, on Long Island, New York. The case remains...
The bodies were found during the search for a missing woman named Shannan Gilbert, a sex worker who disappeared in May 2010. As the search progressed, additional remains and body parts were discovered in the area, ultimately totaling at least ten victims. The remains were found along a stretch of Ocean Parkway, leading to speculation that the killer may have been familiar with the area.The victims found at Gilgo Beach were mostly young women who had advertised their services on websites like Craigslist. Many of them had been strangled to death, and some had been dismembered.

The killer exhibited a pattern of targeting individuals involved in the sex trade, which led investigators to believe that he may have had knowledge or experience in law enforcement or another profession that allowed him to avoid suspicion.Over the years, several suspects have been considered, including individuals with connections to the area and potential links to law enforcement. However, no arrests have been made in connection with the Long Island Serial Killer case, and the killer's identity remains a mystery.

The case has garnered significant media attention and has sparked public interest and speculation, but the lack of substantial leads and evidence has hindered progress in the investigation.Law enforcement agencies, including the Suffolk County Police Department, have continued their efforts to solve the case. In recent years, new technological advancements and forensic techniques have been utilized to reexamine the evidence and potentially identify the killer.

Additionally, the case has prompted discussions about the safety of sex workers and the need for improved strategies to protect and support vulnerable individuals in society.The Long Island Serial Killer case stands as one of the most notorious unsolved serial murder cases in recent history. The hope for closure and justice for the victims and their families remains, as investigators persist in their pursuit of the killer and the truth behind these heinous crimes.





to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

Long Island Serial Killer ‘cherry-picked’ his ‘vulnerable’ Gilgo Beach murder victims for ‘personal’ reason, experts say | The US Sun (the-sun.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>840breakingnews,buzzfeedunsolvedtruecrime,news,truecrime,truecrimeaddict,truecrimeallthetime,truecrimeandchill,truecrimebooks,truecrimecommunity,truecrimefan,truecrimegarage,truecrimejunkie,truecrimeobsessed,truecrimepodcast,truecrimepodcasts,truecrimereport,truecrimes,truecrimestoriestruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-maxwell-trial-transcripts-kate-describes-her-relationship-with-ghislaine-maxwell-part-10-11-13-26--76321634
Kate's testimony provided prosecutors with evidence of Maxwell's alleged methods of cultivating relationships with vulnerable young women, gaining their trust, and gradually introducing them to sexual activity with Epstein. She explained that her admiration for Maxwell and desire for acceptance made it difficult to recognize the exploitation she was experiencing, while her fear of Epstein and Maxwell's powerful connections contributed to her continued association with them. Kate acknowledged maintaining contact with Epstein for years afterward, explaining that distancing herself would have forced her to confront what had happened. During cross-examination, Maxwell's defense attorneys attempted to undermine her credibility by questioning her history of substance abuse, continued communications with Epstein, and a $3.25 million settlement she received through an Epstein victims' compensation arrangement. Kate rejected suggestions that her substance use had distorted her recollection of the significant events she described. Because she was above the applicable age of consent during the alleged encounters, Judge Alison Nathan instructed jurors that Kate was not a victim of the offenses charged against Maxwell and that her testimony could not independently establish Maxwell's guilt. Nevertheless, prosecutors presented her account as evidence of the broader pattern of recruitment and grooming they alleged Maxwell employed to facilitate Epstein's sexual exploitation of young women and underage girls.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Ghislaine Maxwell Trial Transcript, 12.6.21

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76321634Sat, 14 Nov 2026 01:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciDuring the 2021 federal sex trafficking trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, a British woman testifying under the pseudonym "Kate" described how Maxwell allegedly groomed her for sexual encounters with Jeffrey Epstein after they met in Paris in 1994, when Kate...
Kate's testimony provided prosecutors with evidence of Maxwell's alleged methods of cultivating relationships with vulnerable young women, gaining their trust, and gradually introducing them to sexual activity with Epstein. She explained that her admiration for Maxwell and desire for acceptance made it difficult to recognize the exploitation she was experiencing, while her fear of Epstein and Maxwell's powerful connections contributed to her continued association with them. Kate acknowledged maintaining contact with Epstein for years afterward, explaining that distancing herself would have forced her to confront what had happened. During cross-examination, Maxwell's defense attorneys attempted to undermine her credibility by questioning her history of substance abuse, continued communications with Epstein, and a $3.25 million settlement she received through an Epstein victims' compensation arrangement. Kate rejected suggestions that her substance use had distorted her recollection of the significant events she described. Because she was above the applicable age of consent during the alleged encounters, Judge Alison Nathan instructed jurors that Kate was not a victim of the offenses charged against Maxwell and that her testimony could not independently establish Maxwell's guilt. Nevertheless, prosecutors presented her account as evidence of the broader pattern of recruitment and grooming they alleged Maxwell employed to facilitate Epstein's sexual exploitation of young women and underage girls.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Ghislaine Maxwell Trial Transcript, 12.6.21

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>594epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-maxwell-trial-transcripts-kate-describes-her-relationship-with-ghislaine-maxwell-part-9-11-12-26--76306068
Kate's testimony provided prosecutors with evidence of Maxwell's alleged methods of cultivating relationships with vulnerable young women, gaining their trust, and gradually introducing them to sexual activity with Epstein. She explained that her admiration for Maxwell and desire for acceptance made it difficult to recognize the exploitation she was experiencing, while her fear of Epstein and Maxwell's powerful connections contributed to her continued association with them. Kate acknowledged maintaining contact with Epstein for years afterward, explaining that distancing herself would have forced her to confront what had happened. During cross-examination, Maxwell's defense attorneys attempted to undermine her credibility by questioning her history of substance abuse, continued communications with Epstein, and a $3.25 million settlement she received through an Epstein victims' compensation arrangement. Kate rejected suggestions that her substance use had distorted her recollection of the significant events she described. Because she was above the applicable age of consent during the alleged encounters, Judge Alison Nathan instructed jurors that Kate was not a victim of the offenses charged against Maxwell and that her testimony could not independently establish Maxwell's guilt. Nevertheless, prosecutors presented her account as evidence of the broader pattern of recruitment and grooming they alleged Maxwell employed to facilitate Epstein's sexual exploitation of young women and underage girls.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Ghislaine Maxwell Trial Transcript, 12.6.21

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76306068Fri, 13 Nov 2026 23:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDuring the 2021 federal sex trafficking trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, a British woman testifying under the pseudonym "Kate" described how Maxwell allegedly groomed her for sexual encounters with Jeffrey Epstein after they met in Paris in 1994, when Kate...
Kate's testimony provided prosecutors with evidence of Maxwell's alleged methods of cultivating relationships with vulnerable young women, gaining their trust, and gradually introducing them to sexual activity with Epstein. She explained that her admiration for Maxwell and desire for acceptance made it difficult to recognize the exploitation she was experiencing, while her fear of Epstein and Maxwell's powerful connections contributed to her continued association with them. Kate acknowledged maintaining contact with Epstein for years afterward, explaining that distancing herself would have forced her to confront what had happened. During cross-examination, Maxwell's defense attorneys attempted to undermine her credibility by questioning her history of substance abuse, continued communications with Epstein, and a $3.25 million settlement she received through an Epstein victims' compensation arrangement. Kate rejected suggestions that her substance use had distorted her recollection of the significant events she described. Because she was above the applicable age of consent during the alleged encounters, Judge Alison Nathan instructed jurors that Kate was not a victim of the offenses charged against Maxwell and that her testimony could not independently establish Maxwell's guilt. Nevertheless, prosecutors presented her account as evidence of the broader pattern of recruitment and grooming they alleged Maxwell employed to facilitate Epstein's sexual exploitation of young women and underage girls.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Ghislaine Maxwell Trial Transcript, 12.6.21

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>663epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-gop-house-oversight-report-on-jeffrey-epstein-and-the-failure-of-federal-authorities-part-6-11-13-26--76321632
The Republican report also examined Epstein's August 2019 death at the Metropolitan Correctional Center, documenting serious security failures, missed prisoner checks, malfunctioning surveillance cameras, and unanswered questions surrounding an unidentified orange figure captured on video near his housing area. Although investigators did not overturn the official suicide finding, they acknowledged that certain questions remained unresolved. The committee criticized the Justice Department's failure to meet Epstein Files Transparency Act requirements and its mishandling of survivor information through inadequate redactions, while simultaneously praising the Trump administration's transparency efforts and accusing congressional Democrats of prioritizing investigations into Trump over broader accountability. Its recommendations included renewed scrutiny of potential facilitators, stronger survivor protections, restrictions on abusive nondisclosure agreements, improved financial oversight, and reforms to federal investigative procedures. Despite documenting extensive institutional failures and acknowledging that numerous potentially important witnesses had yet to be interviewed, the Republican majority's report stopped short of establishing a comprehensive accounting of everyone who helped sustain Epstein's operation, leaving fundamental questions about criminal responsibility, government protection, and meaningful accountability unanswered.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

A-Review-of-the-Federal-Governments-Mishandling-of-the-Jeffrey-Epstein-and-Ghislaine-Maxwell-Criminal-Investigations_OGR-Maj-Report.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76321632Fri, 13 Nov 2026 21:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciA 137-page report released on November 10, 2026, by the Republican-led House Oversight Committee under Chairman James Comer detailed decades of government misconduct concerns, institutional negligence, and preferential treatment that allowed Jeffrey...
The Republican report also examined Epstein's August 2019 death at the Metropolitan Correctional Center, documenting serious security failures, missed prisoner checks, malfunctioning surveillance cameras, and unanswered questions surrounding an unidentified orange figure captured on video near his housing area. Although investigators did not overturn the official suicide finding, they acknowledged that certain questions remained unresolved. The committee criticized the Justice Department's failure to meet Epstein Files Transparency Act requirements and its mishandling of survivor information through inadequate redactions, while simultaneously praising the Trump administration's transparency efforts and accusing congressional Democrats of prioritizing investigations into Trump over broader accountability. Its recommendations included renewed scrutiny of potential facilitators, stronger survivor protections, restrictions on abusive nondisclosure agreements, improved financial oversight, and reforms to federal investigative procedures. Despite documenting extensive institutional failures and acknowledging that numerous potentially important witnesses had yet to be interviewed, the Republican majority's report stopped short of establishing a comprehensive accounting of everyone who helped sustain Epstein's operation, leaving fundamental questions about criminal responsibility, government protection, and meaningful accountability unanswered.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

A-Review-of-the-Federal-Governments-Mishandling-of-the-Jeffrey-Epstein-and-Ghislaine-Maxwell-Criminal-Investigations_OGR-Maj-Report.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>861epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-gop-house-oversight-report-on-jeffrey-epstein-and-the-failure-of-federal-authorities-part-5-11-13-26--76321635
The Republican report also examined Epstein's August 2019 death at the Metropolitan Correctional Center, documenting serious security failures, missed prisoner checks, malfunctioning surveillance cameras, and unanswered questions surrounding an unidentified orange figure captured on video near his housing area. Although investigators did not overturn the official suicide finding, they acknowledged that certain questions remained unresolved. The committee criticized the Justice Department's failure to meet Epstein Files Transparency Act requirements and its mishandling of survivor information through inadequate redactions, while simultaneously praising the Trump administration's transparency efforts and accusing congressional Democrats of prioritizing investigations into Trump over broader accountability. Its recommendations included renewed scrutiny of potential facilitators, stronger survivor protections, restrictions on abusive nondisclosure agreements, improved financial oversight, and reforms to federal investigative procedures. Despite documenting extensive institutional failures and acknowledging that numerous potentially important witnesses had yet to be interviewed, the Republican majority's report stopped short of establishing a comprehensive accounting of everyone who helped sustain Epstein's operation, leaving fundamental questions about criminal responsibility, government protection, and meaningful accountability unanswered.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

A-Review-of-the-Federal-Governments-Mishandling-of-the-Jeffrey-Epstein-and-Ghislaine-Maxwell-Criminal-Investigations_OGR-Maj-Report.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76321635Fri, 13 Nov 2026 19:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciA 137-page report released on November 10, 2026, by the Republican-led House Oversight Committee under Chairman James Comer detailed decades of government misconduct concerns, institutional negligence, and preferential treatment that allowed Jeffrey...
The Republican report also examined Epstein's August 2019 death at the Metropolitan Correctional Center, documenting serious security failures, missed prisoner checks, malfunctioning surveillance cameras, and unanswered questions surrounding an unidentified orange figure captured on video near his housing area. Although investigators did not overturn the official suicide finding, they acknowledged that certain questions remained unresolved. The committee criticized the Justice Department's failure to meet Epstein Files Transparency Act requirements and its mishandling of survivor information through inadequate redactions, while simultaneously praising the Trump administration's transparency efforts and accusing congressional Democrats of prioritizing investigations into Trump over broader accountability. Its recommendations included renewed scrutiny of potential facilitators, stronger survivor protections, restrictions on abusive nondisclosure agreements, improved financial oversight, and reforms to federal investigative procedures. Despite documenting extensive institutional failures and acknowledging that numerous potentially important witnesses had yet to be interviewed, the Republican majority's report stopped short of establishing a comprehensive accounting of everyone who helped sustain Epstein's operation, leaving fundamental questions about criminal responsibility, government protection, and meaningful accountability unanswered.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

A-Review-of-the-Federal-Governments-Mishandling-of-the-Jeffrey-Epstein-and-Ghislaine-Maxwell-Criminal-Investigations_OGR-Maj-Report.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>739epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-gop-house-oversight-report-on-jeffrey-epstein-and-the-failure-of-federal-authorities-part-4-11-13-26--76321631
The Republican report also examined Epstein's August 2019 death at the Metropolitan Correctional Center, documenting serious security failures, missed prisoner checks, malfunctioning surveillance cameras, and unanswered questions surrounding an unidentified orange figure captured on video near his housing area. Although investigators did not overturn the official suicide finding, they acknowledged that certain questions remained unresolved. The committee criticized the Justice Department's failure to meet Epstein Files Transparency Act requirements and its mishandling of survivor information through inadequate redactions, while simultaneously praising the Trump administration's transparency efforts and accusing congressional Democrats of prioritizing investigations into Trump over broader accountability. Its recommendations included renewed scrutiny of potential facilitators, stronger survivor protections, restrictions on abusive nondisclosure agreements, improved financial oversight, and reforms to federal investigative procedures. Despite documenting extensive institutional failures and acknowledging that numerous potentially important witnesses had yet to be interviewed, the Republican majority's report stopped short of establishing a comprehensive accounting of everyone who helped sustain Epstein's operation, leaving fundamental questions about criminal responsibility, government protection, and meaningful accountability unanswered.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

A-Review-of-the-Federal-Governments-Mishandling-of-the-Jeffrey-Epstein-and-Ghislaine-Maxwell-Criminal-Investigations_OGR-Maj-Report.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76321631Fri, 13 Nov 2026 17:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciA 137-page report released on November 10, 2026, by the Republican-led House Oversight Committee under Chairman James Comer detailed decades of government misconduct concerns, institutional negligence, and preferential treatment that allowed Jeffrey...
The Republican report also examined Epstein's August 2019 death at the Metropolitan Correctional Center, documenting serious security failures, missed prisoner checks, malfunctioning surveillance cameras, and unanswered questions surrounding an unidentified orange figure captured on video near his housing area. Although investigators did not overturn the official suicide finding, they acknowledged that certain questions remained unresolved. The committee criticized the Justice Department's failure to meet Epstein Files Transparency Act requirements and its mishandling of survivor information through inadequate redactions, while simultaneously praising the Trump administration's transparency efforts and accusing congressional Democrats of prioritizing investigations into Trump over broader accountability. Its recommendations included renewed scrutiny of potential facilitators, stronger survivor protections, restrictions on abusive nondisclosure agreements, improved financial oversight, and reforms to federal investigative procedures. Despite documenting extensive institutional failures and acknowledging that numerous potentially important witnesses had yet to be interviewed, the Republican majority's report stopped short of establishing a comprehensive accounting of everyone who helped sustain Epstein's operation, leaving fundamental questions about criminal responsibility, government protection, and meaningful accountability unanswered.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

A-Review-of-the-Federal-Governments-Mishandling-of-the-Jeffrey-Epstein-and-Ghislaine-Maxwell-Criminal-Investigations_OGR-Maj-Report.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>759epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/why-the-modeling-industry-deserves-an-epstein-related-reckoning-11-13-26--76321633
The investigation also exposed the extensive international network of modeling scouts and agents who allegedly helped introduce young women to Epstein, including Daniel Siad, Ramsey Elkholy, and figures associated with prominent modeling agencies. Siad reportedly made approximately 100 trips across 21 countries on Epstein's behalf and received more than $100,000, while Elkholy allegedly attempted to connect 34 women with the financier and exchanged more than 1,000 emails with him. Another survivor, identified as Simona, claimed Epstein raped her approximately 200 times after persuading her to abandon modeling and become his assistant. The investigation also examined Epstein's relationship with Faith Kates, founder of Next Management, who denied knowingly facilitating abuse and maintained through her attorneys that Epstein had deceived her. Elkholy similarly denied involvement in any abuse. Siad died in July 2026, while French authorities continued investigating allegations involving organized human trafficking and criminal conspiracy. Survivors and their attorneys argued that Epstein's operation depended on an interconnected network of individuals who identified vulnerable women, facilitated introductions, and helped maintain access to potential victims. The revelations intensified questions about why these recruitment networks were never subjected to a more comprehensive criminal investigation and why so many individuals connected to Epstein's operation escaped meaningful accountability.




to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

I was repeatedly raped as a teen model by paedo Epstein while he was SERVING a prison sentence - he destroyed my youth

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76321633Fri, 13 Nov 2026 15:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciA woman identified as Roza, who moved from Uzbekistan to the United States at 18 to pursue a modeling career, has accused Jeffrey Epstein of repeatedly raping her over a three-year period after her modeling agency arranged two supposed photoshoots at...
The investigation also exposed the extensive international network of modeling scouts and agents who allegedly helped introduce young women to Epstein, including Daniel Siad, Ramsey Elkholy, and figures associated with prominent modeling agencies. Siad reportedly made approximately 100 trips across 21 countries on Epstein's behalf and received more than $100,000, while Elkholy allegedly attempted to connect 34 women with the financier and exchanged more than 1,000 emails with him. Another survivor, identified as Simona, claimed Epstein raped her approximately 200 times after persuading her to abandon modeling and become his assistant. The investigation also examined Epstein's relationship with Faith Kates, founder of Next Management, who denied knowingly facilitating abuse and maintained through her attorneys that Epstein had deceived her. Elkholy similarly denied involvement in any abuse. Siad died in July 2026, while French authorities continued investigating allegations involving organized human trafficking and criminal conspiracy. Survivors and their attorneys argued that Epstein's operation depended on an interconnected network of individuals who identified vulnerable women, facilitated introductions, and helped maintain access to potential victims. The revelations intensified questions about why these recruitment networks were never subjected to a more comprehensive criminal investigation and why so many individuals connected to Epstein's operation escaped meaningful accountability.




to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

I was repeatedly raped as a teen model by paedo Epstein while he was SERVING a prison sentence - he destroyed my youth

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>824epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/thomas-massie-secures-218-signatures-for-epstein-files-transparency-act-ii-11-13-26--76321636

The legislation could have particularly significant consequences for New Mexico, where Attorney General Raúl Torrez has been attempting to investigate alleged sexual abuse and trafficking connected to Epstein's former Zorro Ranch near Santa Fe. New Mexico reopened its criminal investigation in February 2026 and subsequently sued the Justice Department and Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, accusing federal authorities of obstructing the investigation by refusing to provide crucial unredacted evidence. State officials maintain that federal prosecutors previously persuaded New Mexico investigators to suspend their inquiries in 2019 with assurances that relevant information would eventually be shared, promises they contend were never fulfilled. The proposed Epstein Files Transparency Act II could strengthen New Mexico's ability to obtain federal investigative materials, challenge DOJ refusals in court, and pursue potential criminal charges against individuals associated with Epstein's activities at the ranch where state law still permits prosecution. The legislation could also support the state's broader efforts to investigate Epstein's associates and complement the work of New Mexico's legislative truth commission, which has been examining allegations surrounding Zorro Ranch. Although passage would not automatically guarantee access to every document or produce criminal charges, it could substantially change New Mexico's legal position by providing new tools to overcome federal resistance and pursue investigative leads that have remained inaccessible for years.




to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Epstein report prompts calls for feds’ cooperation in New Mexico probes | Local News | santafenewmexican.com


Massie Gets 218 Signatures for Epstein Files Vote | Newsmax.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76321636Fri, 13 Nov 2026 13:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciRepublican Congressman Thomas Massie secured the 218 signatures necessary to force a House vote on the Epstein Files Transparency Act II on November 11, 2026, marking another significant confrontation with the Trump administration over its handling of...

The legislation could have particularly significant consequences for New Mexico, where Attorney General Raúl Torrez has been attempting to investigate alleged sexual abuse and trafficking connected to Epstein's former Zorro Ranch near Santa Fe. New Mexico reopened its criminal investigation in February 2026 and subsequently sued the Justice Department and Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, accusing federal authorities of obstructing the investigation by refusing to provide crucial unredacted evidence. State officials maintain that federal prosecutors previously persuaded New Mexico investigators to suspend their inquiries in 2019 with assurances that relevant information would eventually be shared, promises they contend were never fulfilled. The proposed Epstein Files Transparency Act II could strengthen New Mexico's ability to obtain federal investigative materials, challenge DOJ refusals in court, and pursue potential criminal charges against individuals associated with Epstein's activities at the ranch where state law still permits prosecution. The legislation could also support the state's broader efforts to investigate Epstein's associates and complement the work of New Mexico's legislative truth commission, which has been examining allegations surrounding Zorro Ranch. Although passage would not automatically guarantee access to every document or produce criminal charges, it could substantially change New Mexico's legal position by providing new tools to overcome federal resistance and pursue investigative leads that have remained inaccessible for years.




to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Epstein report prompts calls for feds’ cooperation in New Mexico probes | Local News | santafenewmexican.com


Massie Gets 218 Signatures for Epstein Files Vote | Newsmax.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: 868epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-donald-trump-jeffrey-epstein-and-jane-doe-4-11-13-26--76320683
Rather than declaring victory and moving on, Massie continued pressing the administration throughout 2026, accusing the Justice Department of unlawfully withholding millions of Epstein-related records while failing to provide satisfactory explanations for its redactions. Alongside Khanna, he sought judicial scrutiny of the department's compliance and introduced the Epstein Files Transparency Act II in July 2026, legislation intended to give survivors, members of Congress, and state attorneys general the ability to sue the federal government to compel disclosure. The proposal also sought to provide survivors with access to unredacted records concerning their own abuse and make investigative materials available to state and local prosecutors pursuing Epstein-related cases. Massie subsequently launched another discharge petition, once again challenging Republican leadership and attempting to force a vote despite resistance from members of his own party. His campaign gained additional attention as lawmakers questioned whether the Justice Department was using legal privileges and excessive redactions to conceal material that Congress had already ordered released. With the 2026 midterm elections producing a Democratic congressional majority, Massie's efforts gained renewed momentum, although his impending departure from Congress in January 2027 created additional urgency for the legislation. His fight has distinguished him from Republicans who publicly championed Epstein transparency while resisting measures that would compel the administration to deliver it. By repeatedly challenging Trump, confronting congressional leadership, and seeking enforceable legal consequences for noncompliance, Massie has made the Epstein files a defining issue of his final years in Congress, demonstrating a willingness to break with his own party over a scandal that continues to raise serious questions about government secrecy and accountability.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76320683Fri, 13 Nov 2026 11:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciRepublican Congressman Thomas Massie of Kentucky has emerged as one of the most determined advocates for transparency in the Jeffrey Epstein case, repeatedly confronting President Donald Trump, House Republican leadership, and the Justice Department...
Rather than declaring victory and moving on, Massie continued pressing the administration throughout 2026, accusing the Justice Department of unlawfully withholding millions of Epstein-related records while failing to provide satisfactory explanations for its redactions. Alongside Khanna, he sought judicial scrutiny of the department's compliance and introduced the Epstein Files Transparency Act II in July 2026, legislation intended to give survivors, members of Congress, and state attorneys general the ability to sue the federal government to compel disclosure. The proposal also sought to provide survivors with access to unredacted records concerning their own abuse and make investigative materials available to state and local prosecutors pursuing Epstein-related cases. Massie subsequently launched another discharge petition, once again challenging Republican leadership and attempting to force a vote despite resistance from members of his own party. His campaign gained additional attention as lawmakers questioned whether the Justice Department was using legal privileges and excessive redactions to conceal material that Congress had already ordered released. With the 2026 midterm elections producing a Democratic congressional majority, Massie's efforts gained renewed momentum, although his impending departure from Congress in January 2027 created additional urgency for the legislation. His fight has distinguished him from Republicans who publicly championed Epstein transparency while resisting measures that would compel the administration to deliver it. By repeatedly challenging Trump, confronting congressional leadership, and seeking enforceable legal consequences for noncompliance, Massie has made the Epstein files a defining issue of his final years in Congress, demonstrating a willingness to break with his own party over a scandal that continues to raise serious questions about government secrecy and accountability.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: 3828epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-transcripts-from-the-alex-acosta-deposition-part-16-20-11-13-26--76320684
Even more damning was Acosta’s insistence that he acted out of pragmatism, not pressure. He denied that anyone “higher up” told him to back off—even though he once told reporters that he’d been informed Epstein “belonged to intelligence.” Under oath, he downplayed that statement, twisting it into bureaucratic double-speak. He even claimed the deal achieved “some level of justice” because Epstein registered as a sex offender—a hollow justification that only exposed how insulated from reality he remains. Acosta never showed remorse for the irreparable damage caused by his cowardice. His congressional testimony reeked of moral rot, the same rot that let a billionaire pedophile walk free while survivors were left to pick up the pieces.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Acosta Transcript.pdf - Google Drive

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76320684Fri, 13 Nov 2026 09:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciWhen Alex Acosta sat before Congress to explain himself, what unfolded was less an act of accountability and more a masterclass in bureaucratic self-preservation. He painted the 2008 Epstein plea deal as a “strategic compromise,” claiming a federal...
Even more damning was Acosta’s insistence that he acted out of pragmatism, not pressure. He denied that anyone “higher up” told him to back off—even though he once told reporters that he’d been informed Epstein “belonged to intelligence.” Under oath, he downplayed that statement, twisting it into bureaucratic double-speak. He even claimed the deal achieved “some level of justice” because Epstein registered as a sex offender—a hollow justification that only exposed how insulated from reality he remains. Acosta never showed remorse for the irreparable damage caused by his cowardice. His congressional testimony reeked of moral rot, the same rot that let a billionaire pedophile walk free while survivors were left to pick up the pieces.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Acosta Transcript.pdf - Google Drive

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3378epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-transcripts-from-the-alex-acosta-deposition-part-13-15-11-12-26--76320685
Even more damning was Acosta’s insistence that he acted out of pragmatism, not pressure. He denied that anyone “higher up” told him to back off—even though he once told reporters that he’d been informed Epstein “belonged to intelligence.” Under oath, he downplayed that statement, twisting it into bureaucratic double-speak. He even claimed the deal achieved “some level of justice” because Epstein registered as a sex offender—a hollow justification that only exposed how insulated from reality he remains. Acosta never showed remorse for the irreparable damage caused by his cowardice. His congressional testimony reeked of moral rot, the same rot that let a billionaire pedophile walk free while survivors were left to pick up the pieces.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Acosta Transcript.pdf - Google Drive

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76320685Fri, 13 Nov 2026 07:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciWhen Alex Acosta sat before Congress to explain himself, what unfolded was less an act of accountability and more a masterclass in bureaucratic self-preservation. He painted the 2008 Epstein plea deal as a “strategic compromise,” claiming a federal...
Even more damning was Acosta’s insistence that he acted out of pragmatism, not pressure. He denied that anyone “higher up” told him to back off—even though he once told reporters that he’d been informed Epstein “belonged to intelligence.” Under oath, he downplayed that statement, twisting it into bureaucratic double-speak. He even claimed the deal achieved “some level of justice” because Epstein registered as a sex offender—a hollow justification that only exposed how insulated from reality he remains. Acosta never showed remorse for the irreparable damage caused by his cowardice. His congressional testimony reeked of moral rot, the same rot that let a billionaire pedophile walk free while survivors were left to pick up the pieces.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Acosta Transcript.pdf - Google Drive

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2977epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-search-for-the-little-rock-slasher--76319185
In April 2021, the Little Rock Police Department publicly announced that investigators believed the four attacks were connected and warned residents about a suspected serial killer operating in the city. Police obtained surveillance footage showing a possible suspect and enlisted assistance from the FBI's Behavioral Analysis Unit to develop an investigative profile. Walker, the sole known survivor, described her attacker as a tall, slender Black man, while investigators emphasized that the assaults appeared unprovoked and involved victims who had no known connection to one another. Authorities offered a reward of up to $20,000 for information leading to an arrest and conviction, but the investigation produced no publicly confirmed identification of the killer. The attacks stopped as suddenly as they had begun, leaving investigators uncertain whether the perpetrator had moved away, died, been incarcerated for another offense, or simply stopped killing. Despite the surveillance evidence, survivor testimony, and extensive publicity, no arrest or conviction had been publicly confirmed as of November 2026, leaving the Little Rock Slasher case among Arkansas's most disturbing unresolved serial murder investigations.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76319185Fri, 13 Nov 2026 05:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciThe Little Rock Slasher, also known as the River City Ripper, was an unidentified suspected serial killer linked to a series of brutal knife attacks in Little Rock, Arkansas, between August 2020 and April 2021. The attacks left three people dead and...
In April 2021, the Little Rock Police Department publicly announced that investigators believed the four attacks were connected and warned residents about a suspected serial killer operating in the city. Police obtained surveillance footage showing a possible suspect and enlisted assistance from the FBI's Behavioral Analysis Unit to develop an investigative profile. Walker, the sole known survivor, described her attacker as a tall, slender Black man, while investigators emphasized that the assaults appeared unprovoked and involved victims who had no known connection to one another. Authorities offered a reward of up to $20,000 for information leading to an arrest and conviction, but the investigation produced no publicly confirmed identification of the killer. The attacks stopped as suddenly as they had begun, leaving investigators uncertain whether the perpetrator had moved away, died, been incarcerated for another offense, or simply stopped killing. Despite the surveillance evidence, survivor testimony, and extensive publicity, no arrest or conviction had been publicly confirmed as of November 2026, leaving the Little Rock Slasher case among Arkansas's most disturbing unresolved serial murder investigations.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>847breakingnews,coldcase,coldcases,disappeared,missing,missingpeople,missingpersons,news,newsupdate,talesofthemissing,thosewhohavevanished,truecrime,truecrimeaddict,truecrimecommunity,truecrimejunkie,truecrimeobsessed,truecrimepodcast,unsolvedmysteries,unsolvedmystery,vanishedtruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-sinaloa-cartel-s-fractured-empire-el-marino-and-the-rise-of-los-exiliados--76319184
The allegations emerged from a massive cyberattack against Mexico's Defense Ministry carried out by the hacker collective Guacamaya, which obtained more than four million confidential documents containing sensitive intelligence about organized crime, military operations, and government activities. Among the stolen records was an August 2022 military intelligence report identifying six priority criminal targets, including Martínez, Juan Carlos Valencia, and Julio Alberto Castillo Rodríguez, the latter two having family connections to Jalisco New Generation Cartel leader Nemesio Oseguera Cervantes, known as “El Mencho.” The leaked documents also exposed allegations of corruption within Mexico's armed forces, including a 2019 incident in which a military member reportedly offered to sell 70 hand grenades to a criminal organization for approximately $1,300 each, with eight allegedly purchased and delivered. The revelations highlighted the increasingly complicated relationship between Mexico's military institutions and organized crime, particularly as former service members used their training and connections to establish criminal enterprises. Martínez's reported activities also drew comparisons to Los Zetas, the notoriously violent cartel originally formed by former Mexican special forces personnel. The allegations surrounding Los Exiliados illustrated how internal cartel rivalries, military defections, and corruption contributed to the emergence of new trafficking organizations competing for control of Mexico's lucrative narcotics trade.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76319184Fri, 13 Nov 2026 03:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciCarlos Enrique Martínez Cuesta, a former Mexican marine known as “El Marino” or “El 5,” allegedly established his own drug trafficking organization after breaking away from the powerful Sinaloa Cartel, according to confidential Mexican military...
The allegations emerged from a massive cyberattack against Mexico's Defense Ministry carried out by the hacker collective Guacamaya, which obtained more than four million confidential documents containing sensitive intelligence about organized crime, military operations, and government activities. Among the stolen records was an August 2022 military intelligence report identifying six priority criminal targets, including Martínez, Juan Carlos Valencia, and Julio Alberto Castillo Rodríguez, the latter two having family connections to Jalisco New Generation Cartel leader Nemesio Oseguera Cervantes, known as “El Mencho.” The leaked documents also exposed allegations of corruption within Mexico's armed forces, including a 2019 incident in which a military member reportedly offered to sell 70 hand grenades to a criminal organization for approximately $1,300 each, with eight allegedly purchased and delivered. The revelations highlighted the increasingly complicated relationship between Mexico's military institutions and organized crime, particularly as former service members used their training and connections to establish criminal enterprises. Martínez's reported activities also drew comparisons to Los Zetas, the notoriously violent cartel originally formed by former Mexican special forces personnel. The allegations surrounding Los Exiliados illustrated how internal cartel rivalries, military defections, and corruption contributed to the emergence of new trafficking organizations competing for control of Mexico's lucrative narcotics trade.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>673breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,cartel,cartelnews,chapitos,cjng,elchapo,elmayo,elmayozambada,jaliscocartel,loschapitos,mayitos,mexico,narcos,news,occ,organizedcrime,rico,sinaloacartel,zambadatruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-maxwell-trial-transcripts-kate-describes-her-relationship-with-ghislaine-maxwell-part-8-11-12-26--76306072
Kate's testimony provided prosecutors with evidence of Maxwell's alleged methods of cultivating relationships with vulnerable young women, gaining their trust, and gradually introducing them to sexual activity with Epstein. She explained that her admiration for Maxwell and desire for acceptance made it difficult to recognize the exploitation she was experiencing, while her fear of Epstein and Maxwell's powerful connections contributed to her continued association with them. Kate acknowledged maintaining contact with Epstein for years afterward, explaining that distancing herself would have forced her to confront what had happened. During cross-examination, Maxwell's defense attorneys attempted to undermine her credibility by questioning her history of substance abuse, continued communications with Epstein, and a $3.25 million settlement she received through an Epstein victims' compensation arrangement. Kate rejected suggestions that her substance use had distorted her recollection of the significant events she described. Because she was above the applicable age of consent during the alleged encounters, Judge Alison Nathan instructed jurors that Kate was not a victim of the offenses charged against Maxwell and that her testimony could not independently establish Maxwell's guilt. Nevertheless, prosecutors presented her account as evidence of the broader pattern of recruitment and grooming they alleged Maxwell employed to facilitate Epstein's sexual exploitation of young women and underage girls.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Ghislaine Maxwell Trial Transcript, 12.6.21

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76306072Fri, 13 Nov 2026 01:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDuring the 2021 federal sex trafficking trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, a British woman testifying under the pseudonym "Kate" described how Maxwell allegedly groomed her for sexual encounters with Jeffrey Epstein after they met in Paris in 1994, when Kate...
Kate's testimony provided prosecutors with evidence of Maxwell's alleged methods of cultivating relationships with vulnerable young women, gaining their trust, and gradually introducing them to sexual activity with Epstein. She explained that her admiration for Maxwell and desire for acceptance made it difficult to recognize the exploitation she was experiencing, while her fear of Epstein and Maxwell's powerful connections contributed to her continued association with them. Kate acknowledged maintaining contact with Epstein for years afterward, explaining that distancing herself would have forced her to confront what had happened. During cross-examination, Maxwell's defense attorneys attempted to undermine her credibility by questioning her history of substance abuse, continued communications with Epstein, and a $3.25 million settlement she received through an Epstein victims' compensation arrangement. Kate rejected suggestions that her substance use had distorted her recollection of the significant events she described. Because she was above the applicable age of consent during the alleged encounters, Judge Alison Nathan instructed jurors that Kate was not a victim of the offenses charged against Maxwell and that her testimony could not independently establish Maxwell's guilt. Nevertheless, prosecutors presented her account as evidence of the broader pattern of recruitment and grooming they alleged Maxwell employed to facilitate Epstein's sexual exploitation of young women and underage girls.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Ghislaine Maxwell Trial Transcript, 12.6.21

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>726epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-gop-house-oversight-report-on-jeffrey-epstein-and-the-failure-of-federal-authorities-part-3-11-12-26--76306070
The Republican report also examined Epstein's August 2019 death at the Metropolitan Correctional Center, documenting serious security failures, missed prisoner checks, malfunctioning surveillance cameras, and unanswered questions surrounding an unidentified orange figure captured on video near his housing area. Although investigators did not overturn the official suicide finding, they acknowledged that certain questions remained unresolved. The committee criticized the Justice Department's failure to meet Epstein Files Transparency Act requirements and its mishandling of survivor information through inadequate redactions, while simultaneously praising the Trump administration's transparency efforts and accusing congressional Democrats of prioritizing investigations into Trump over broader accountability. Its recommendations included renewed scrutiny of potential facilitators, stronger survivor protections, restrictions on abusive nondisclosure agreements, improved financial oversight, and reforms to federal investigative procedures. Despite documenting extensive institutional failures and acknowledging that numerous potentially important witnesses had yet to be interviewed, the Republican majority's report stopped short of establishing a comprehensive accounting of everyone who helped sustain Epstein's operation, leaving fundamental questions about criminal responsibility, government protection, and meaningful accountability unanswered.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

A-Review-of-the-Federal-Governments-Mishandling-of-the-Jeffrey-Epstein-and-Ghislaine-Maxwell-Criminal-Investigations_OGR-Maj-Report.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76306070Thu, 12 Nov 2026 23:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciA 137-page report released on November 10, 2026, by the Republican-led House Oversight Committee under Chairman James Comer detailed decades of government misconduct concerns, institutional negligence, and preferential treatment that allowed Jeffrey...
The Republican report also examined Epstein's August 2019 death at the Metropolitan Correctional Center, documenting serious security failures, missed prisoner checks, malfunctioning surveillance cameras, and unanswered questions surrounding an unidentified orange figure captured on video near his housing area. Although investigators did not overturn the official suicide finding, they acknowledged that certain questions remained unresolved. The committee criticized the Justice Department's failure to meet Epstein Files Transparency Act requirements and its mishandling of survivor information through inadequate redactions, while simultaneously praising the Trump administration's transparency efforts and accusing congressional Democrats of prioritizing investigations into Trump over broader accountability. Its recommendations included renewed scrutiny of potential facilitators, stronger survivor protections, restrictions on abusive nondisclosure agreements, improved financial oversight, and reforms to federal investigative procedures. Despite documenting extensive institutional failures and acknowledging that numerous potentially important witnesses had yet to be interviewed, the Republican majority's report stopped short of establishing a comprehensive accounting of everyone who helped sustain Epstein's operation, leaving fundamental questions about criminal responsibility, government protection, and meaningful accountability unanswered.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

A-Review-of-the-Federal-Governments-Mishandling-of-the-Jeffrey-Epstein-and-Ghislaine-Maxwell-Criminal-Investigations_OGR-Maj-Report.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>867epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-gop-house-oversight-report-on-jeffrey-epstein-and-the-failure-of-federal-authorities-part-2-11-12-26--76306069
The Republican report also examined Epstein's August 2019 death at the Metropolitan Correctional Center, documenting serious security failures, missed prisoner checks, malfunctioning surveillance cameras, and unanswered questions surrounding an unidentified orange figure captured on video near his housing area. Although investigators did not overturn the official suicide finding, they acknowledged that certain questions remained unresolved. The committee criticized the Justice Department's failure to meet Epstein Files Transparency Act requirements and its mishandling of survivor information through inadequate redactions, while simultaneously praising the Trump administration's transparency efforts and accusing congressional Democrats of prioritizing investigations into Trump over broader accountability. Its recommendations included renewed scrutiny of potential facilitators, stronger survivor protections, restrictions on abusive nondisclosure agreements, improved financial oversight, and reforms to federal investigative procedures. Despite documenting extensive institutional failures and acknowledging that numerous potentially important witnesses had yet to be interviewed, the Republican majority's report stopped short of establishing a comprehensive accounting of everyone who helped sustain Epstein's operation, leaving fundamental questions about criminal responsibility, government protection, and meaningful accountability unanswered.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

A-Review-of-the-Federal-Governments-Mishandling-of-the-Jeffrey-Epstein-and-Ghislaine-Maxwell-Criminal-Investigations_OGR-Maj-Report.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76306069Thu, 12 Nov 2026 21:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciA 137-page report released on November 10, 2026, by the Republican-led House Oversight Committee under Chairman James Comer detailed decades of government misconduct concerns, institutional negligence, and preferential treatment that allowed Jeffrey...
The Republican report also examined Epstein's August 2019 death at the Metropolitan Correctional Center, documenting serious security failures, missed prisoner checks, malfunctioning surveillance cameras, and unanswered questions surrounding an unidentified orange figure captured on video near his housing area. Although investigators did not overturn the official suicide finding, they acknowledged that certain questions remained unresolved. The committee criticized the Justice Department's failure to meet Epstein Files Transparency Act requirements and its mishandling of survivor information through inadequate redactions, while simultaneously praising the Trump administration's transparency efforts and accusing congressional Democrats of prioritizing investigations into Trump over broader accountability. Its recommendations included renewed scrutiny of potential facilitators, stronger survivor protections, restrictions on abusive nondisclosure agreements, improved financial oversight, and reforms to federal investigative procedures. Despite documenting extensive institutional failures and acknowledging that numerous potentially important witnesses had yet to be interviewed, the Republican majority's report stopped short of establishing a comprehensive accounting of everyone who helped sustain Epstein's operation, leaving fundamental questions about criminal responsibility, government protection, and meaningful accountability unanswered.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

A-Review-of-the-Federal-Governments-Mishandling-of-the-Jeffrey-Epstein-and-Ghislaine-Maxwell-Criminal-Investigations_OGR-Maj-Report.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>732epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-gop-house-oversight-report-on-jeffrey-epstein-and-the-failure-of-federal-authorities-part-1-11-12-26--76306071
The Republican report also examined Epstein's August 2019 death at the Metropolitan Correctional Center, documenting serious security failures, missed prisoner checks, malfunctioning surveillance cameras, and unanswered questions surrounding an unidentified orange figure captured on video near his housing area. Although investigators did not overturn the official suicide finding, they acknowledged that certain questions remained unresolved. The committee criticized the Justice Department's failure to meet Epstein Files Transparency Act requirements and its mishandling of survivor information through inadequate redactions, while simultaneously praising the Trump administration's transparency efforts and accusing congressional Democrats of prioritizing investigations into Trump over broader accountability. Its recommendations included renewed scrutiny of potential facilitators, stronger survivor protections, restrictions on abusive nondisclosure agreements, improved financial oversight, and reforms to federal investigative procedures. Despite documenting extensive institutional failures and acknowledging that numerous potentially important witnesses had yet to be interviewed, the Republican majority's report stopped short of establishing a comprehensive accounting of everyone who helped sustain Epstein's operation, leaving fundamental questions about criminal responsibility, government protection, and meaningful accountability unanswered.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

A-Review-of-the-Federal-Governments-Mishandling-of-the-Jeffrey-Epstein-and-Ghislaine-Maxwell-Criminal-Investigations_OGR-Maj-Report.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76306071Thu, 12 Nov 2026 19:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciA 137-page report released on November 10, 2026, by the Republican-led House Oversight Committee under Chairman James Comer detailed decades of government misconduct concerns, institutional negligence, and preferential treatment that allowed Jeffrey...
The Republican report also examined Epstein's August 2019 death at the Metropolitan Correctional Center, documenting serious security failures, missed prisoner checks, malfunctioning surveillance cameras, and unanswered questions surrounding an unidentified orange figure captured on video near his housing area. Although investigators did not overturn the official suicide finding, they acknowledged that certain questions remained unresolved. The committee criticized the Justice Department's failure to meet Epstein Files Transparency Act requirements and its mishandling of survivor information through inadequate redactions, while simultaneously praising the Trump administration's transparency efforts and accusing congressional Democrats of prioritizing investigations into Trump over broader accountability. Its recommendations included renewed scrutiny of potential facilitators, stronger survivor protections, restrictions on abusive nondisclosure agreements, improved financial oversight, and reforms to federal investigative procedures. Despite documenting extensive institutional failures and acknowledging that numerous potentially important witnesses had yet to be interviewed, the Republican majority's report stopped short of establishing a comprehensive accounting of everyone who helped sustain Epstein's operation, leaving fundamental questions about criminal responsibility, government protection, and meaningful accountability unanswered.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

A-Review-of-the-Federal-Governments-Mishandling-of-the-Jeffrey-Epstein-and-Ghislaine-Maxwell-Criminal-Investigations_OGR-Maj-Report.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>691epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-man-who-promised-to-expose-epstein-and-delivered-absolutely-nothing-11-12-26--76306067
Bongino's tenure ultimately became a monument to the enormous difference between screaming about corruption from behind a microphone and confronting it while occupying a position of genuine authority. Reports of internal disputes, public backlash, and his eventual departure from the FBI only reinforced the perception that his grand crusade had produced considerably more drama than meaningful results. Congress ultimately had to enact legislation requiring the release of Epstein-related records, underscoring how little Bongino's presence had done to satisfy the public's demands for transparency. After leaving government, he returned to the familiar comforts of broadcasting, where he could resume lecturing Americans about courage, accountability, and the failures of Washington without bearing responsibility for fixing them. The entire episode exposed the hollowness of a political persona built on volume, theatrical aggression, and promises that proved much easier to make than fulfill. The real disgrace was that Jeffrey Epstein's victims and the American public deserved serious answers, not another self-promoting tough guy turning their pursuit of justice into a career opportunity. Bongino promised to expose the establishment, got himself a seat inside it, accomplished little that satisfied the people demanding answers, and returned to his microphone to continue complaining about the very system he had failed to change.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76306067Thu, 12 Nov 2026 17:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDan Bongino spent years building his reputation as a fearless opponent of government corruption, presenting himself as a political warrior who would stop at nothing to expose the truth about Jeffrey Epstein and the powerful people who surrounded him....
Bongino's tenure ultimately became a monument to the enormous difference between screaming about corruption from behind a microphone and confronting it while occupying a position of genuine authority. Reports of internal disputes, public backlash, and his eventual departure from the FBI only reinforced the perception that his grand crusade had produced considerably more drama than meaningful results. Congress ultimately had to enact legislation requiring the release of Epstein-related records, underscoring how little Bongino's presence had done to satisfy the public's demands for transparency. After leaving government, he returned to the familiar comforts of broadcasting, where he could resume lecturing Americans about courage, accountability, and the failures of Washington without bearing responsibility for fixing them. The entire episode exposed the hollowness of a political persona built on volume, theatrical aggression, and promises that proved much easier to make than fulfill. The real disgrace was that Jeffrey Epstein's victims and the American public deserved serious answers, not another self-promoting tough guy turning their pursuit of justice into a career opportunity. Bongino promised to expose the establishment, got himself a seat inside it, accomplished little that satisfied the people demanding answers, and returned to his microphone to continue complaining about the very system he had failed to change.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1278epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-washington-examiner-s-epstein-deflection-how-to-miss-the-point-of-an-entire-election-11-12-26--76306066
The larger weakness in the article's argument was its apparent reluctance to consider that Republican leaders might bear responsibility for the political consequences of their own decisions. Voters demanding the release of Epstein-related evidence were not responsible for the administration's response to those demands, and questioning powerful individuals with documented connections to Epstein was not inherently partisan or unreasonable. The commentary offered no demonstrated basis for concluding that continued scrutiny of Epstein was itself responsible for Republican electoral losses, as opposed to the administration's conduct becoming a source of voter dissatisfaction. Its emphasis on defending Trump also diverted attention from the broader failures documented throughout the Epstein case, including preferential treatment, inadequate investigations, and the limited accountability faced by individuals who helped sustain his operation. The result was a political argument that appeared to confuse the consequences of a controversy with the act of investigating it. Rather than confronting why the Epstein issue remained politically damaging, the article seemed to suggest that the real problem was the refusal of journalists and the public to stop asking questions.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

The Epstein files obsession also enabled the midterm election debacle

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76306066Thu, 12 Nov 2026 15:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciA November 11, 2026, opinion piece published by the Washington Examiner attempted to explain the Republican Party's disastrous midterm performance by portraying the continued scrutiny of Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump's relationship with him as a...
The larger weakness in the article's argument was its apparent reluctance to consider that Republican leaders might bear responsibility for the political consequences of their own decisions. Voters demanding the release of Epstein-related evidence were not responsible for the administration's response to those demands, and questioning powerful individuals with documented connections to Epstein was not inherently partisan or unreasonable. The commentary offered no demonstrated basis for concluding that continued scrutiny of Epstein was itself responsible for Republican electoral losses, as opposed to the administration's conduct becoming a source of voter dissatisfaction. Its emphasis on defending Trump also diverted attention from the broader failures documented throughout the Epstein case, including preferential treatment, inadequate investigations, and the limited accountability faced by individuals who helped sustain his operation. The result was a political argument that appeared to confuse the consequences of a controversy with the act of investigating it. Rather than confronting why the Epstein issue remained politically damaging, the article seemed to suggest that the real problem was the refusal of journalists and the public to stop asking questions.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

The Epstein files obsession also enabled the midterm election debacle

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>861epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-transcripts-from-the-alex-acosta-deposition-part-10-12-11-12-26--76303903
Even more damning was Acosta’s insistence that he acted out of pragmatism, not pressure. He denied that anyone “higher up” told him to back off—even though he once told reporters that he’d been informed Epstein “belonged to intelligence.” Under oath, he downplayed that statement, twisting it into bureaucratic double-speak. He even claimed the deal achieved “some level of justice” because Epstein registered as a sex offender—a hollow justification that only exposed how insulated from reality he remains. Acosta never showed remorse for the irreparable damage caused by his cowardice. His congressional testimony reeked of moral rot, the same rot that let a billionaire pedophile walk free while survivors were left to pick up the pieces.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Acosta Transcript.pdf - Google Drive

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76303903Thu, 12 Nov 2026 13:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciWhen Alex Acosta sat before Congress to explain himself, what unfolded was less an act of accountability and more a masterclass in bureaucratic self-preservation. He painted the 2008 Epstein plea deal as a “strategic compromise,” claiming a federal...
Even more damning was Acosta’s insistence that he acted out of pragmatism, not pressure. He denied that anyone “higher up” told him to back off—even though he once told reporters that he’d been informed Epstein “belonged to intelligence.” Under oath, he downplayed that statement, twisting it into bureaucratic double-speak. He even claimed the deal achieved “some level of justice” because Epstein registered as a sex offender—a hollow justification that only exposed how insulated from reality he remains. Acosta never showed remorse for the irreparable damage caused by his cowardice. His congressional testimony reeked of moral rot, the same rot that let a billionaire pedophile walk free while survivors were left to pick up the pieces.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Acosta Transcript.pdf - Google Drive

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2610epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-transcripts-from-the-alex-acosta-deposition-part-7-9-11-12-26--76303855
Even more damning was Acosta’s insistence that he acted out of pragmatism, not pressure. He denied that anyone “higher up” told him to back off—even though he once told reporters that he’d been informed Epstein “belonged to intelligence.” Under oath, he downplayed that statement, twisting it into bureaucratic double-speak. He even claimed the deal achieved “some level of justice” because Epstein registered as a sex offender—a hollow justification that only exposed how insulated from reality he remains. Acosta never showed remorse for the irreparable damage caused by his cowardice. His congressional testimony reeked of moral rot, the same rot that let a billionaire pedophile walk free while survivors were left to pick up the pieces.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Acosta Transcript.pdf - Google Drive

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76303855Thu, 12 Nov 2026 11:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciWhen Alex Acosta sat before Congress to explain himself, what unfolded was less an act of accountability and more a masterclass in bureaucratic self-preservation. He painted the 2008 Epstein plea deal as a “strategic compromise,” claiming a federal...
Even more damning was Acosta’s insistence that he acted out of pragmatism, not pressure. He denied that anyone “higher up” told him to back off—even though he once told reporters that he’d been informed Epstein “belonged to intelligence.” Under oath, he downplayed that statement, twisting it into bureaucratic double-speak. He even claimed the deal achieved “some level of justice” because Epstein registered as a sex offender—a hollow justification that only exposed how insulated from reality he remains. Acosta never showed remorse for the irreparable damage caused by his cowardice. His congressional testimony reeked of moral rot, the same rot that let a billionaire pedophile walk free while survivors were left to pick up the pieces.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Acosta Transcript.pdf - Google Drive

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2065epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-transcripts-from-the-alex-acosta-deposition-part-4-6-11-12-26--76303853
Even more damning was Acosta’s insistence that he acted out of pragmatism, not pressure. He denied that anyone “higher up” told him to back off—even though he once told reporters that he’d been informed Epstein “belonged to intelligence.” Under oath, he downplayed that statement, twisting it into bureaucratic double-speak. He even claimed the deal achieved “some level of justice” because Epstein registered as a sex offender—a hollow justification that only exposed how insulated from reality he remains. Acosta never showed remorse for the irreparable damage caused by his cowardice. His congressional testimony reeked of moral rot, the same rot that let a billionaire pedophile walk free while survivors were left to pick up the pieces.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Acosta Transcript.pdf - Google Drive

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76303853Thu, 12 Nov 2026 09:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciWhen Alex Acosta sat before Congress to explain himself, what unfolded was less an act of accountability and more a masterclass in bureaucratic self-preservation. He painted the 2008 Epstein plea deal as a “strategic compromise,” claiming a federal...
Even more damning was Acosta’s insistence that he acted out of pragmatism, not pressure. He denied that anyone “higher up” told him to back off—even though he once told reporters that he’d been informed Epstein “belonged to intelligence.” Under oath, he downplayed that statement, twisting it into bureaucratic double-speak. He even claimed the deal achieved “some level of justice” because Epstein registered as a sex offender—a hollow justification that only exposed how insulated from reality he remains. Acosta never showed remorse for the irreparable damage caused by his cowardice. His congressional testimony reeked of moral rot, the same rot that let a billionaire pedophile walk free while survivors were left to pick up the pieces.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Acosta Transcript.pdf - Google Drive

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2946epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-transcripts-from-the-alex-acosta-deposition-part-1-3-11-12-26--76303854
Even more damning was Acosta’s insistence that he acted out of pragmatism, not pressure. He denied that anyone “higher up” told him to back off—even though he once told reporters that he’d been informed Epstein “belonged to intelligence.” Under oath, he downplayed that statement, twisting it into bureaucratic double-speak. He even claimed the deal achieved “some level of justice” because Epstein registered as a sex offender—a hollow justification that only exposed how insulated from reality he remains. Acosta never showed remorse for the irreparable damage caused by his cowardice. His congressional testimony reeked of moral rot, the same rot that let a billionaire pedophile walk free while survivors were left to pick up the pieces.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Acosta Transcript.pdf - Google Drive

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76303854Thu, 12 Nov 2026 07:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciWhen Alex Acosta sat before Congress to explain himself, what unfolded was less an act of accountability and more a masterclass in bureaucratic self-preservation. He painted the 2008 Epstein plea deal as a “strategic compromise,” claiming a federal...
Even more damning was Acosta’s insistence that he acted out of pragmatism, not pressure. He denied that anyone “higher up” told him to back off—even though he once told reporters that he’d been informed Epstein “belonged to intelligence.” Under oath, he downplayed that statement, twisting it into bureaucratic double-speak. He even claimed the deal achieved “some level of justice” because Epstein registered as a sex offender—a hollow justification that only exposed how insulated from reality he remains. Acosta never showed remorse for the irreparable damage caused by his cowardice. His congressional testimony reeked of moral rot, the same rot that let a billionaire pedophile walk free while survivors were left to pick up the pieces.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Acosta Transcript.pdf - Google Drive

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2438epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-pilot-from-arkansas-and-his-boss-pablo-escobar--76303622
Betzner became particularly significant because of his allegations concerning the intersection of drug trafficking, American foreign policy, and the covert war against Nicaragua's Sandinista government. During sworn testimony before a Senate subcommittee chaired by Senator John Kerry in April 1988, Betzner described transporting weapons and military supplies to locations associated with the U.S.-backed Contra rebels in Central America before returning with shipments of cocaine destined for the United States. His testimony raised questions about whether individuals involved in supporting the Contras knowingly facilitated narcotics trafficking and whether American intelligence agencies overlooked criminal activity because it served broader geopolitical objectives. Betzner described flights involving facilities in El Salvador and Costa Rica, including an airstrip operated by Contra associate John Hull, and claimed that weapons deliveries and cocaine shipments were part of interconnected operations. Although his testimony did not establish that the CIA itself directed his drug flights, it contributed to congressional scrutiny of the relationship between the Contra supply network and international narcotics traffickers. His account became part of the broader Iran-Contra controversy, exposing how covert military operations, organized crime, and political interests could intersect in ways that complicated federal drug enforcement. Betzner's significance extended beyond his career as a smuggler because he provided firsthand testimony about a trafficking network whose alleged political protection raised fundamental questions about who was profiting from the drug trade and how much American authorities knew.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76303622Thu, 12 Nov 2026 05:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciGary Wayne Betzner was an American pilot, former crop duster, and international drug smuggler whose extraordinary criminal career connected him to Colombian cocaine traffickers, the Central American drug trade, and allegations surrounding the...
Betzner became particularly significant because of his allegations concerning the intersection of drug trafficking, American foreign policy, and the covert war against Nicaragua's Sandinista government. During sworn testimony before a Senate subcommittee chaired by Senator John Kerry in April 1988, Betzner described transporting weapons and military supplies to locations associated with the U.S.-backed Contra rebels in Central America before returning with shipments of cocaine destined for the United States. His testimony raised questions about whether individuals involved in supporting the Contras knowingly facilitated narcotics trafficking and whether American intelligence agencies overlooked criminal activity because it served broader geopolitical objectives. Betzner described flights involving facilities in El Salvador and Costa Rica, including an airstrip operated by Contra associate John Hull, and claimed that weapons deliveries and cocaine shipments were part of interconnected operations. Although his testimony did not establish that the CIA itself directed his drug flights, it contributed to congressional scrutiny of the relationship between the Contra supply network and international narcotics traffickers. His account became part of the broader Iran-Contra controversy, exposing how covert military operations, organized crime, and political interests could intersect in ways that complicated federal drug enforcement. Betzner's significance extended beyond his career as a smuggler because he provided firsthand testimony about a trafficking network whose alleged political protection raised fundamental questions about who was profiting from the drug trade and how much American authorities knew.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1237breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,cartel,cartelnews,chapitos,cjng,elchapo,elmayo,elmayozambada,jaliscocartel,loschapitos,mayitos,mexico,narcos,news,occ,organizedcrime,rico,sinaloacartel,zambadatruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/cjng-and-their-supermarket-hustle-in-sacramento--76303621
The investigation, which began in April 2016, involved the FBI, DEA, Homeland Security Investigations, and local law enforcement agencies, using confidential informants, surveillance, recorded conversations, and monitored drug transactions to document the alleged trafficking network. Investigators described a June 2021 transaction in which Chavez and Ponce allegedly sold half a kilogram of cocaine to an informant for $7,000, while additional surveillance revealed the movement of substantial quantities of narcotics and cash across California and into Washington state. Authorities also documented more than $400,000 in suspected drug proceeds delivered to Gonzalez during three trips and seized nearly $80,000 concealed inside a vehicle during an October 2021 traffic stop. Although Chavez was accused of laundering money through his supermarket, he was not separately charged with money laundering in the original complaint. Both defendants faced potential sentences of up to 40 years in federal prison and fines reaching $5 million if convicted. The case illustrated how a major Mexican trafficking organization's supply network could allegedly operate through an otherwise ordinary neighborhood business, using legitimate commercial activity to conceal an extensive narcotics distribution operation.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76303621Thu, 12 Nov 2026 03:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciFederal investigators uncovered an alleged cocaine trafficking and money laundering operation operating out of La Victoria Supermercado, a grocery store in Sacramento, California, with connections to Mexico's notorious Jalisco New Generation Cartel...
The investigation, which began in April 2016, involved the FBI, DEA, Homeland Security Investigations, and local law enforcement agencies, using confidential informants, surveillance, recorded conversations, and monitored drug transactions to document the alleged trafficking network. Investigators described a June 2021 transaction in which Chavez and Ponce allegedly sold half a kilogram of cocaine to an informant for $7,000, while additional surveillance revealed the movement of substantial quantities of narcotics and cash across California and into Washington state. Authorities also documented more than $400,000 in suspected drug proceeds delivered to Gonzalez during three trips and seized nearly $80,000 concealed inside a vehicle during an October 2021 traffic stop. Although Chavez was accused of laundering money through his supermarket, he was not separately charged with money laundering in the original complaint. Both defendants faced potential sentences of up to 40 years in federal prison and fines reaching $5 million if convicted. The case illustrated how a major Mexican trafficking organization's supply network could allegedly operate through an otherwise ordinary neighborhood business, using legitimate commercial activity to conceal an extensive narcotics distribution operation.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1155breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,cartel,cartelnews,chapitos,cjng,elchapo,elmayo,elmayozambada,jaliscocartel,loschapitos,mayitos,mexico,narcos,news,occ,organizedcrime,rico,sinaloacartel,zambadatruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-maxwell-trial-transcripts-kate-describes-her-relationship-with-ghislaine-maxwell-part-6-11-11-26--76290981
Kate's testimony provided prosecutors with evidence of Maxwell's alleged methods of cultivating relationships with vulnerable young women, gaining their trust, and gradually introducing them to sexual activity with Epstein. She explained that her admiration for Maxwell and desire for acceptance made it difficult to recognize the exploitation she was experiencing, while her fear of Epstein and Maxwell's powerful connections contributed to her continued association with them. Kate acknowledged maintaining contact with Epstein for years afterward, explaining that distancing herself would have forced her to confront what had happened. During cross-examination, Maxwell's defense attorneys attempted to undermine her credibility by questioning her history of substance abuse, continued communications with Epstein, and a $3.25 million settlement she received through an Epstein victims' compensation arrangement. Kate rejected suggestions that her substance use had distorted her recollection of the significant events she described. Because she was above the applicable age of consent during the alleged encounters, Judge Alison Nathan instructed jurors that Kate was not a victim of the offenses charged against Maxwell and that her testimony could not independently establish Maxwell's guilt. Nevertheless, prosecutors presented her account as evidence of the broader pattern of recruitment and grooming they alleged Maxwell employed to facilitate Epstein's sexual exploitation of young women and underage girls.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Ghislaine Maxwell Trial Transcript, 12.6.21

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76290981Thu, 12 Nov 2026 01:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDuring the 2021 federal sex trafficking trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, a British woman testifying under the pseudonym "Kate" described how Maxwell allegedly groomed her for sexual encounters with Jeffrey Epstein after they met in Paris in 1994, when Kate...
Kate's testimony provided prosecutors with evidence of Maxwell's alleged methods of cultivating relationships with vulnerable young women, gaining their trust, and gradually introducing them to sexual activity with Epstein. She explained that her admiration for Maxwell and desire for acceptance made it difficult to recognize the exploitation she was experiencing, while her fear of Epstein and Maxwell's powerful connections contributed to her continued association with them. Kate acknowledged maintaining contact with Epstein for years afterward, explaining that distancing herself would have forced her to confront what had happened. During cross-examination, Maxwell's defense attorneys attempted to undermine her credibility by questioning her history of substance abuse, continued communications with Epstein, and a $3.25 million settlement she received through an Epstein victims' compensation arrangement. Kate rejected suggestions that her substance use had distorted her recollection of the significant events she described. Because she was above the applicable age of consent during the alleged encounters, Judge Alison Nathan instructed jurors that Kate was not a victim of the offenses charged against Maxwell and that her testimony could not independently establish Maxwell's guilt. Nevertheless, prosecutors presented her account as evidence of the broader pattern of recruitment and grooming they alleged Maxwell employed to facilitate Epstein's sexual exploitation of young women and underage girls.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Ghislaine Maxwell Trial Transcript, 12.6.21

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>710epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-maxwell-trial-transcripts-kate-describes-her-relationship-with-ghislaine-maxwell-part-5-11-11-26--76290980
Kate's testimony provided prosecutors with evidence of Maxwell's alleged methods of cultivating relationships with vulnerable young women, gaining their trust, and gradually introducing them to sexual activity with Epstein. She explained that her admiration for Maxwell and desire for acceptance made it difficult to recognize the exploitation she was experiencing, while her fear of Epstein and Maxwell's powerful connections contributed to her continued association with them. Kate acknowledged maintaining contact with Epstein for years afterward, explaining that distancing herself would have forced her to confront what had happened. During cross-examination, Maxwell's defense attorneys attempted to undermine her credibility by questioning her history of substance abuse, continued communications with Epstein, and a $3.25 million settlement she received through an Epstein victims' compensation arrangement. Kate rejected suggestions that her substance use had distorted her recollection of the significant events she described. Because she was above the applicable age of consent during the alleged encounters, Judge Alison Nathan instructed jurors that Kate was not a victim of the offenses charged against Maxwell and that her testimony could not independently establish Maxwell's guilt. Nevertheless, prosecutors presented her account as evidence of the broader pattern of recruitment and grooming they alleged Maxwell employed to facilitate Epstein's sexual exploitation of young women and underage girls.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Ghislaine Maxwell Trial Transcript, 12.6.21

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76290980Wed, 11 Nov 2026 23:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDuring the 2021 federal sex trafficking trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, a British woman testifying under the pseudonym "Kate" described how Maxwell allegedly groomed her for sexual encounters with Jeffrey Epstein after they met in Paris in 1994, when Kate...
Kate's testimony provided prosecutors with evidence of Maxwell's alleged methods of cultivating relationships with vulnerable young women, gaining their trust, and gradually introducing them to sexual activity with Epstein. She explained that her admiration for Maxwell and desire for acceptance made it difficult to recognize the exploitation she was experiencing, while her fear of Epstein and Maxwell's powerful connections contributed to her continued association with them. Kate acknowledged maintaining contact with Epstein for years afterward, explaining that distancing herself would have forced her to confront what had happened. During cross-examination, Maxwell's defense attorneys attempted to undermine her credibility by questioning her history of substance abuse, continued communications with Epstein, and a $3.25 million settlement she received through an Epstein victims' compensation arrangement. Kate rejected suggestions that her substance use had distorted her recollection of the significant events she described. Because she was above the applicable age of consent during the alleged encounters, Judge Alison Nathan instructed jurors that Kate was not a victim of the offenses charged against Maxwell and that her testimony could not independently establish Maxwell's guilt. Nevertheless, prosecutors presented her account as evidence of the broader pattern of recruitment and grooming they alleged Maxwell employed to facilitate Epstein's sexual exploitation of young women and underage girls.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Ghislaine Maxwell Trial Transcript, 12.6.21

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>840epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-maxwell-trial-transcripts-kate-describes-her-relationship-with-ghislaine-maxwell-part-4-11-11-26--76290983
Kate's testimony provided prosecutors with evidence of Maxwell's alleged methods of cultivating relationships with vulnerable young women, gaining their trust, and gradually introducing them to sexual activity with Epstein. She explained that her admiration for Maxwell and desire for acceptance made it difficult to recognize the exploitation she was experiencing, while her fear of Epstein and Maxwell's powerful connections contributed to her continued association with them. Kate acknowledged maintaining contact with Epstein for years afterward, explaining that distancing herself would have forced her to confront what had happened. During cross-examination, Maxwell's defense attorneys attempted to undermine her credibility by questioning her history of substance abuse, continued communications with Epstein, and a $3.25 million settlement she received through an Epstein victims' compensation arrangement. Kate rejected suggestions that her substance use had distorted her recollection of the significant events she described. Because she was above the applicable age of consent during the alleged encounters, Judge Alison Nathan instructed jurors that Kate was not a victim of the offenses charged against Maxwell and that her testimony could not independently establish Maxwell's guilt. Nevertheless, prosecutors presented her account as evidence of the broader pattern of recruitment and grooming they alleged Maxwell employed to facilitate Epstein's sexual exploitation of young women and underage girls.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Ghislaine Maxwell Trial Transcript, 12.6.21

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76290983Wed, 11 Nov 2026 21:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDuring the 2021 federal sex trafficking trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, a British woman testifying under the pseudonym "Kate" described how Maxwell allegedly groomed her for sexual encounters with Jeffrey Epstein after they met in Paris in 1994, when Kate...
Kate's testimony provided prosecutors with evidence of Maxwell's alleged methods of cultivating relationships with vulnerable young women, gaining their trust, and gradually introducing them to sexual activity with Epstein. She explained that her admiration for Maxwell and desire for acceptance made it difficult to recognize the exploitation she was experiencing, while her fear of Epstein and Maxwell's powerful connections contributed to her continued association with them. Kate acknowledged maintaining contact with Epstein for years afterward, explaining that distancing herself would have forced her to confront what had happened. During cross-examination, Maxwell's defense attorneys attempted to undermine her credibility by questioning her history of substance abuse, continued communications with Epstein, and a $3.25 million settlement she received through an Epstein victims' compensation arrangement. Kate rejected suggestions that her substance use had distorted her recollection of the significant events she described. Because she was above the applicable age of consent during the alleged encounters, Judge Alison Nathan instructed jurors that Kate was not a victim of the offenses charged against Maxwell and that her testimony could not independently establish Maxwell's guilt. Nevertheless, prosecutors presented her account as evidence of the broader pattern of recruitment and grooming they alleged Maxwell employed to facilitate Epstein's sexual exploitation of young women and underage girls.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Ghislaine Maxwell Trial Transcript, 12.6.21

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>688epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-republican-epstein-report-a-mountain-of-evidence-and-a-shortage-of-accountability-11-11-26--76290982
The report also examined Epstein’s relationships with powerful figures, including Howard Lutnick, Bill Gates, Leon Black, Kathryn Ruemmler, and Stacey Plaskett, raising questions about the financial, political, and institutional connections that survived his 2008 conviction. Investigators highlighted Black’s approximately $158 million to $170 million in payments to Epstein, Lutnick’s previously undisclosed 2012 island visit, and Epstein’s continued access to influential individuals. The committee reported finding no evidence implicating Donald Trump in Epstein’s criminal activities and did not overturn the official determination that Epstein died by suicide. It also criticized the Justice Department for missing document disclosure deadlines and exposing survivors’ private information. While recommending additional investigations, witness interviews, and institutional reforms, the report left unresolved the central question of why so many individuals connected to Epstein’s operation have never faced meaningful scrutiny or accountability.


to contact me:


Bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


House Oversight report says prosecutorial failures enabled Epstein abuse | Fox News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76290982Wed, 11 Nov 2026 19:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciA report released by the Republican-led House Oversight Committee on November 10, 2026, detailed years of institutional failures, questionable prosecutorial decisions, and preferential treatment that allowed Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell to...
The report also examined Epstein’s relationships with powerful figures, including Howard Lutnick, Bill Gates, Leon Black, Kathryn Ruemmler, and Stacey Plaskett, raising questions about the financial, political, and institutional connections that survived his 2008 conviction. Investigators highlighted Black’s approximately $158 million to $170 million in payments to Epstein, Lutnick’s previously undisclosed 2012 island visit, and Epstein’s continued access to influential individuals. The committee reported finding no evidence implicating Donald Trump in Epstein’s criminal activities and did not overturn the official determination that Epstein died by suicide. It also criticized the Justice Department for missing document disclosure deadlines and exposing survivors’ private information. While recommending additional investigations, witness interviews, and institutional reforms, the report left unresolved the central question of why so many individuals connected to Epstein’s operation have never faced meaningful scrutiny or accountability.


to contact me:


Bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


House Oversight report says prosecutorial failures enabled Epstein abuse | Fox News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>909epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/epstein-s-modeling-industry-connections-face-renewed-scrutiny-after-bbc-investigation-11-11-26--76290979
The investigation also examined the activities of other modeling industry figures connected to Epstein, including former agent Ramsey Elkholy and agency director Faith Kates, whose relationships with the financier appeared in newly released Justice Department documents. Investigators discovered that Elkholy attempted to connect 34 women with Epstein, including an 18-year-old student, and that correspondence suggested arrangements in which Epstein’s female assistants would establish relationships with prospective recruits before introducing them to him. One woman told the BBC that Epstein sexually assaulted her during their first meeting at his Manhattan townhouse when she was 19. Elkholy denied knowingly facilitating abuse, insisting that he believed Epstein’s explanation of his earlier criminal case and had intended only to provide professional opportunities. Another survivor, identified under the pseudonym Simona, alleged that Epstein raped her more than 200 times after she became involved in his world through the modeling industry. Attorney Sigrid McCawley, who represents more than 100 Epstein survivors, emphasized that modeling scouts and agents played a critical role in identifying young women who fit Epstein’s preferences, while victims were frequently manipulated through threats to their livelihoods and professional ambitions. The findings have intensified questions about why individuals who allegedly helped facilitate Epstein’s access to vulnerable women have largely escaped criminal scrutiny. New York State Senator Zellnor Myrie is now proposing legislation that would strengthen authorities’ ability to investigate individuals who enabled sexual trafficking operations, challenging the Justice Department’s previous position that investigators had uncovered insufficient evidence to justify further investigations of uncharged third parties. The revelations highlight the continuing controversy surrounding Epstein’s network of recruiters, professional intermediaries, and associates, many of whom have never been required to publicly account for their relationships with him.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

'There is no justice' - Epstein survivor on how model agency sent her to abuser's home

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76290979Wed, 11 Nov 2026 17:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciA new BBC investigation has raised serious questions about the role of modeling agencies and their executives in Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual abuse and trafficking operation, revealing how young women were allegedly directed into his orbit under the...
The investigation also examined the activities of other modeling industry figures connected to Epstein, including former agent Ramsey Elkholy and agency director Faith Kates, whose relationships with the financier appeared in newly released Justice Department documents. Investigators discovered that Elkholy attempted to connect 34 women with Epstein, including an 18-year-old student, and that correspondence suggested arrangements in which Epstein’s female assistants would establish relationships with prospective recruits before introducing them to him. One woman told the BBC that Epstein sexually assaulted her during their first meeting at his Manhattan townhouse when she was 19. Elkholy denied knowingly facilitating abuse, insisting that he believed Epstein’s explanation of his earlier criminal case and had intended only to provide professional opportunities. Another survivor, identified under the pseudonym Simona, alleged that Epstein raped her more than 200 times after she became involved in his world through the modeling industry. Attorney Sigrid McCawley, who represents more than 100 Epstein survivors, emphasized that modeling scouts and agents played a critical role in identifying young women who fit Epstein’s preferences, while victims were frequently manipulated through threats to their livelihoods and professional ambitions. The findings have intensified questions about why individuals who allegedly helped facilitate Epstein’s access to vulnerable women have largely escaped criminal scrutiny. New York State Senator Zellnor Myrie is now proposing legislation that would strengthen authorities’ ability to investigate individuals who enabled sexual trafficking operations, challenging the Justice Department’s previous position that investigators had uncovered insufficient evidence to justify further investigations of uncharged third parties. The revelations highlight the continuing controversy surrounding Epstein’s network of recruiters, professional intermediaries, and associates, many of whom have never been required to publicly account for their relationships with him.
1093epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/ohio-state-keeps-les-wexner-s-name-as-democrats-prepare-to-investigate-prince-andrew-11-11-26--76290978
Ohio State University has decided to keep Leslie Wexner’s name on its campus buildings despite hundreds of requests demanding its removal over his longstanding relationship with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and questions surrounding his potential knowledge of sexual abuse committed by former university physician Dr. Richard Strauss. The decision, announced November 6, 2026, by interim Executive Vice President and Provost Trevor Brown, effectively halted a university review process that had received 512 petitions between January and September. Petitioners raised concerns about Wexner’s decades-long association with Epstein, as well as allegations involving Strauss, whose sexual abuse of students and athletes became one of the largest scandals in Ohio State’s history. Brown defended the decision by arguing that university policy requires substantial evidence of misconduct before removing a donor’s name from university facilities, emphasizing that Wexner has not been criminally charged. He also maintained that the university’s naming committee was never intended to function as a criminal investigative body and concluded that additional examination of the matter was unwarranted at this time. The decision comes amid continued scrutiny of Wexner’s connections to Epstein and criticism of Ohio State’s handling of allegations involving influential figures associated with the institution. Wexner previously avoided attempts to serve him with a subpoena concerning the Strauss abuse scandal, while survivors of Strauss reached a final settlement with the university in June 2026. Although Brown left open the possibility of reconsidering the naming decision if additional evidence emerges, the university’s refusal to proceed with a more comprehensive review means that Wexner’s name will remain prominently displayed across Ohio State facilities despite the continuing controversy surrounding his relationship with Epstein.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

Democrats to review Andrew's links to Jeffrey Epstein and demand unredacted files are handed over to British police | Daily Mail Online

Les Wexner’s name to remain on Ohio State buildings despite requests for removals - WHIO TV 7 and WHIO Radio

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76290978Wed, 11 Nov 2026 15:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciCongressional Democrats are preparing to renew scrutiny of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein following their victories in the 2026 midterm elections, with lawmakers signaling that the former prince could face additional...
Ohio State University has decided to keep Leslie Wexner’s name on its campus buildings despite hundreds of requests demanding its removal over his longstanding relationship with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and questions surrounding his potential knowledge of sexual abuse committed by former university physician Dr. Richard Strauss. The decision, announced November 6, 2026, by interim Executive Vice President and Provost Trevor Brown, effectively halted a university review process that had received 512 petitions between January and September. Petitioners raised concerns about Wexner’s decades-long association with Epstein, as well as allegations involving Strauss, whose sexual abuse of students and athletes became one of the largest scandals in Ohio State’s history. Brown defended the decision by arguing that university policy requires substantial evidence of misconduct before removing a donor’s name from university facilities, emphasizing that Wexner has not been criminally charged. He also maintained that the university’s naming committee was never intended to function as a criminal investigative body and concluded that additional examination of the matter was unwarranted at this time. The decision comes amid continued scrutiny of Wexner’s connections to Epstein and criticism of Ohio State’s handling of allegations involving influential figures associated with the institution. Wexner previously avoided attempts to serve him with a subpoena concerning the Strauss abuse scandal, while survivors of Strauss reached a final settlement with the university in June 2026. Although Brown left open the possibility of reconsidering the naming decision if additional evidence emerges, the university’s refusal to proceed with a more comprehensive review means that Wexner’s name will remain prominently displayed across Ohio State facilities despite the continuing controversy surrounding his relationship with Epstein.


to contact...]]>776epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-the-unsealed-grand-jury-documents-from-florida-part-10-12-11-11-26--76288615
Even more disturbing was the years-long effort by local authorities to keep these documents hidden from the public. Journalists and advocates had to wage an extended legal battle just to unseal records that should have been transparent from the beginning—records that exposed how deeply the process was manipulated. Palm Beach officials fought the release at every turn, citing flimsy justifications and procedural red tape while ignoring the public’s right to know how justice was subverted. Their resistance wasn’t just bureaucratic—it was a calculated attempt to conceal their own complicity in one of the most disgraceful prosecutorial failures in recent memory. And when the documents finally did come out, they made one thing clear: the cover-up didn’t start in Washington. It started right there in Palm Beach.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Epstein transcripts - DocumentCloud

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76288615Wed, 11 Nov 2026 13:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe once-sealed grand jury documents in the Jeffrey Epstein case revealed exactly what many had long suspected—that the original charges brought in Palm Beach bore little resemblance to the overwhelming evidence collected by law enforcement. Despite...
Even more disturbing was the years-long effort by local authorities to keep these documents hidden from the public. Journalists and advocates had to wage an extended legal battle just to unseal records that should have been transparent from the beginning—records that exposed how deeply the process was manipulated. Palm Beach officials fought the release at every turn, citing flimsy justifications and procedural red tape while ignoring the public’s right to know how justice was subverted. Their resistance wasn’t just bureaucratic—it was a calculated attempt to conceal their own complicity in one of the most disgraceful prosecutorial failures in recent memory. And when the documents finally did come out, they made one thing clear: the cover-up didn’t start in Washington. It started right there in Palm Beach.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Epstein transcripts - DocumentCloud

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2463epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-the-unsealed-grand-jury-documents-from-florida-part-7-9-11-11-26--76288614
Even more disturbing was the years-long effort by local authorities to keep these documents hidden from the public. Journalists and advocates had to wage an extended legal battle just to unseal records that should have been transparent from the beginning—records that exposed how deeply the process was manipulated. Palm Beach officials fought the release at every turn, citing flimsy justifications and procedural red tape while ignoring the public’s right to know how justice was subverted. Their resistance wasn’t just bureaucratic—it was a calculated attempt to conceal their own complicity in one of the most disgraceful prosecutorial failures in recent memory. And when the documents finally did come out, they made one thing clear: the cover-up didn’t start in Washington. It started right there in Palm Beach.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Epstein transcripts - DocumentCloud

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76288614Wed, 11 Nov 2026 11:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe once-sealed grand jury documents in the Jeffrey Epstein case revealed exactly what many had long suspected—that the original charges brought in Palm Beach bore little resemblance to the overwhelming evidence collected by law enforcement. Despite...
Even more disturbing was the years-long effort by local authorities to keep these documents hidden from the public. Journalists and advocates had to wage an extended legal battle just to unseal records that should have been transparent from the beginning—records that exposed how deeply the process was manipulated. Palm Beach officials fought the release at every turn, citing flimsy justifications and procedural red tape while ignoring the public’s right to know how justice was subverted. Their resistance wasn’t just bureaucratic—it was a calculated attempt to conceal their own complicity in one of the most disgraceful prosecutorial failures in recent memory. And when the documents finally did come out, they made one thing clear: the cover-up didn’t start in Washington. It started right there in Palm Beach.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Epstein transcripts - DocumentCloud

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2404epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-the-unsealed-grand-jury-documents-from-florida-part-4-6-11-11-26--76288616
Even more disturbing was the years-long effort by local authorities to keep these documents hidden from the public. Journalists and advocates had to wage an extended legal battle just to unseal records that should have been transparent from the beginning—records that exposed how deeply the process was manipulated. Palm Beach officials fought the release at every turn, citing flimsy justifications and procedural red tape while ignoring the public’s right to know how justice was subverted. Their resistance wasn’t just bureaucratic—it was a calculated attempt to conceal their own complicity in one of the most disgraceful prosecutorial failures in recent memory. And when the documents finally did come out, they made one thing clear: the cover-up didn’t start in Washington. It started right there in Palm Beach.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Epstein transcripts - DocumentCloud

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76288616Wed, 11 Nov 2026 09:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe once-sealed grand jury documents in the Jeffrey Epstein case revealed exactly what many had long suspected—that the original charges brought in Palm Beach bore little resemblance to the overwhelming evidence collected by law enforcement. Despite...
Even more disturbing was the years-long effort by local authorities to keep these documents hidden from the public. Journalists and advocates had to wage an extended legal battle just to unseal records that should have been transparent from the beginning—records that exposed how deeply the process was manipulated. Palm Beach officials fought the release at every turn, citing flimsy justifications and procedural red tape while ignoring the public’s right to know how justice was subverted. Their resistance wasn’t just bureaucratic—it was a calculated attempt to conceal their own complicity in one of the most disgraceful prosecutorial failures in recent memory. And when the documents finally did come out, they made one thing clear: the cover-up didn’t start in Washington. It started right there in Palm Beach.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Epstein transcripts - DocumentCloud

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2401epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-the-unsealed-grand-jury-documents-from-florida-part-1-3-11-11-26--76288617
Even more disturbing was the years-long effort by local authorities to keep these documents hidden from the public. Journalists and advocates had to wage an extended legal battle just to unseal records that should have been transparent from the beginning—records that exposed how deeply the process was manipulated. Palm Beach officials fought the release at every turn, citing flimsy justifications and procedural red tape while ignoring the public’s right to know how justice was subverted. Their resistance wasn’t just bureaucratic—it was a calculated attempt to conceal their own complicity in one of the most disgraceful prosecutorial failures in recent memory. And when the documents finally did come out, they made one thing clear: the cover-up didn’t start in Washington. It started right there in Palm Beach.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Epstein transcripts - DocumentCloud

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76288617Wed, 11 Nov 2026 07:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe once-sealed grand jury documents in the Jeffrey Epstein case revealed exactly what many had long suspected—that the original charges brought in Palm Beach bore little resemblance to the overwhelming evidence collected by law enforcement. Despite...
Even more disturbing was the years-long effort by local authorities to keep these documents hidden from the public. Journalists and advocates had to wage an extended legal battle just to unseal records that should have been transparent from the beginning—records that exposed how deeply the process was manipulated. Palm Beach officials fought the release at every turn, citing flimsy justifications and procedural red tape while ignoring the public’s right to know how justice was subverted. Their resistance wasn’t just bureaucratic—it was a calculated attempt to conceal their own complicity in one of the most disgraceful prosecutorial failures in recent memory. And when the documents finally did come out, they made one thing clear: the cover-up didn’t start in Washington. It started right there in Palm Beach.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Epstein transcripts - DocumentCloud

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2576epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/jack-barsky-and-the-secret-soviet-espionage-operation-inside-the-united-states--76289257Jack Barsky, born Albrecht Dittrich in East Germany in 1949, is a former Soviet KGB intelligence operative who spent approximately a decade living undercover in the United States during the Cold War. Recruited by Soviet intelligence while studying chemistry at the University of Jena, Barsky underwent years of specialized espionage training before entering the United States in 1978 and assuming the identity of a deceased American child named Jack Barsky. Operating as an illegal, the intelligence community's term for an undercover operative without diplomatic protection, he established a seemingly ordinary American life while secretly gathering intelligence for Moscow. He worked as a computer programmer and information technology professional in New York, including at MetLife, while maintaining clandestine contact with his Soviet handlers through coded communications and other espionage techniques. His assignments included identifying potential intelligence recruits, collecting information about American society, and obtaining computer technology useful to the Soviet Union. Barsky eventually married and started a family in America while concealing his true identity, espionage activities, and another family he had left behind in East Germany.

Barsky's remarkable double life began unraveling in 1988 when the KGB ordered him to return to the Soviet bloc, apparently believing his cover had been compromised. Rather than obey, Barsky chose to remain in the United States, largely because of his attachment to his American family, particularly his young daughter. To escape Soviet intelligence, he falsely claimed to have contracted HIV/AIDS, convincing his handlers that he was dying and eventually leading them to inform his family in East Germany that he was dead. He successfully disappeared into ordinary American life until 1997, when the FBI identified him as a former Soviet operative and confronted him about his past. Barsky cooperated extensively with federal investigators, providing information about KGB operations and avoiding criminal prosecution. He subsequently became an American citizen and built a career in the technology industry before publicly revealing his extraordinary history. His story received national attention through a 2015 60 Minutes interview and his 2017 memoir, Deep Undercover: My Secret Life and Tangled Allegiances as a KGB Spy in America. Barsky has since become an author, public speaker, and commentator on espionage and intelligence operations, offering a firsthand perspective on Soviet infiltration, undercover tradecraft, and the ideological conflicts of the Cold War.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76289257Wed, 11 Nov 2026 05:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciJack Barsky, born Albrecht Dittrich in East Germany in 1949, is a former Soviet KGB intelligence operative who spent approximately a decade living undercover in the United States during the Cold War. Recruited by Soviet intelligence while studying...Jack Barsky, born Albrecht Dittrich in East Germany in 1949, is a former Soviet KGB intelligence operative who spent approximately a decade living undercover in the United States during the Cold War. Recruited by Soviet intelligence while studying chemistry at the University of Jena, Barsky underwent years of specialized espionage training before entering the United States in 1978 and assuming the identity of a deceased American child named Jack Barsky. Operating as an illegal, the intelligence community's term for an undercover operative without diplomatic protection, he established a seemingly ordinary American life while secretly gathering intelligence for Moscow. He worked as a computer programmer and information technology professional in New York, including at MetLife, while maintaining clandestine contact with his Soviet handlers through coded communications and other espionage techniques. His assignments included identifying potential intelligence recruits, collecting information about American society, and obtaining computer technology useful to the Soviet Union. Barsky eventually married and started a family in America while concealing his true identity, espionage activities, and another family he had left behind in East Germany.

Barsky's remarkable double life began unraveling in 1988 when the KGB ordered him to return to the Soviet bloc, apparently believing his cover had been compromised. Rather than obey, Barsky chose to remain in the United States, largely because of his attachment to his American family, particularly his young daughter. To escape Soviet intelligence, he falsely claimed to have contracted HIV/AIDS, convincing his handlers that he was dying and eventually leading them to inform his family in East Germany that he was dead. He successfully disappeared into ordinary American life until 1997, when the FBI identified him as a former Soviet operative and confronted him about his past. Barsky cooperated extensively with federal investigators, providing information about KGB operations and avoiding criminal prosecution. He subsequently became an American citizen and built a career in the technology industry before publicly revealing his extraordinary history. His story received national attention through a 2015 60 Minutes interview and his 2017 memoir, Deep Undercover: My Secret Life and Tangled Allegiances as a KGB Spy in America. Barsky has since become an author, public speaker, and commentator on espionage and intelligence operations, offering a firsthand perspective on Soviet infiltration, undercover tradecraft, and the ideological conflicts of the Cold War.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1796breakingnews,buzzfeedunsolvedtruecrime,news,truecrime,truecrimeaddict,truecrimeallthetime,truecrimeandchill,truecrimebooks,truecrimecommunity,truecrimefan,truecrimegarage,truecrimejunkie,truecrimeobsessed,truecrimepodcast,truecrimepodcasts,truecrimereport,truecrimes,truecrimestoriestruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/who-protects-the-drug-lords-el-chapo-points-toward-the-halls-of-government--76289256
The article examined testimony and corruption allegations involving senior Mexican officials, including former Public Security Secretary Genaro García Luna and former Defense Secretary Salvador Cienfuegos. García Luna was accused of accepting millions of dollars in cartel bribes in exchange for allowing trafficking operations to proceed with government protection, while Cienfuegos faced allegations that he protected cartel interests and targeted rival organizations. American prosecutors ultimately dropped the charges against Cienfuegos following negotiations with the Mexican government, allowing him to return home. Testimony from Jesús “El Rey” Zambada, a former Sinaloa Cartel figure, also implicated high-ranking Mexican officials and American law enforcement personnel in the broader trafficking apparatus. The article additionally highlighted corruption investigations involving U.S. border agents, including 153 cases documented by the Center for Investigative Reporting as of 2016. These revelations illustrated how trafficking organizations depended on corrupt relationships extending into government institutions, reinforcing Guzmán's contention that removing cartel leaders without addressing their political protection would do little to stop the narcotics trade. The accusations against individual officials were presented as allegations or testimony at the time of the article's original publication in October 2022, rather than established findings of guilt.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76289256Wed, 11 Nov 2026 03:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJoaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán, the former leader of the Sinaloa Cartel serving a life sentence at ADX Florence in Colorado, claimed that the real power behind the international drug trade rested not simply with cartel bosses but with corrupt politicians...
The article examined testimony and corruption allegations involving senior Mexican officials, including former Public Security Secretary Genaro García Luna and former Defense Secretary Salvador Cienfuegos. García Luna was accused of accepting millions of dollars in cartel bribes in exchange for allowing trafficking operations to proceed with government protection, while Cienfuegos faced allegations that he protected cartel interests and targeted rival organizations. American prosecutors ultimately dropped the charges against Cienfuegos following negotiations with the Mexican government, allowing him to return home. Testimony from Jesús “El Rey” Zambada, a former Sinaloa Cartel figure, also implicated high-ranking Mexican officials and American law enforcement personnel in the broader trafficking apparatus. The article additionally highlighted corruption investigations involving U.S. border agents, including 153 cases documented by the Center for Investigative Reporting as of 2016. These revelations illustrated how trafficking organizations depended on corrupt relationships extending into government institutions, reinforcing Guzmán's contention that removing cartel leaders without addressing their political protection would do little to stop the narcotics trade. The accusations against individual officials were presented as allegations or testimony at the time of the article's original publication in October 2022, rather than established findings of guilt.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1059breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,cartel,cartelnews,chapitos,cjng,elchapo,elmayo,elmayozambada,jaliscocartel,loschapitos,mayitos,mexico,narcos,news,occ,organizedcrime,rico,sinaloacartel,zambadatruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/charlie-kirk-s-accused-killer-tyler-robinson-faces-a-june-2028-trial-11-10-26--76288389
The decision drew sharp criticism from Kirk's family, particularly his widow, Erika Kirk, who had pushed for proceedings to begin in 2027 and argued that further delays would prolong the family's suffering. Attorneys representing the family also criticized the growing expense of Robinson's publicly funded defense, which they claimed had already generated approximately $1.6 million in legal bills. Prosecutors have alleged that Robinson targeted Kirk because of his political and social views, pointing to text messages and other evidence they believe establish his motive. Robinson's defense attorneys have challenged the reliability of the prosecution's video and DNA evidence while disputing allegations concerning his motivations. Robinson has pleaded not guilty, and prosecutors are seeking the death penalty, which could potentially be carried out by firing squad under Utah law. With the trial now scheduled for the summer of 2028, the proceedings are expected to involve extensive legal arguments over forensic evidence, jury selection, potential sentencing, and whether Robinson can receive a fair trial amid the extraordinary publicity surrounding Kirk's assassination.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Trial date set for Tyler Robinson, accused assassin of Charlie Kirk

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76288389Wed, 11 Nov 2026 01:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciA Utah judge has scheduled the capital murder trial of Tyler Robinson, the 23-year-old accused of assassinating conservative activist Charlie Kirk, to begin with jury selection on June 21, 2028. District Judge Tony Graf rejected the defense team's...
The decision drew sharp criticism from Kirk's family, particularly his widow, Erika Kirk, who had pushed for proceedings to begin in 2027 and argued that further delays would prolong the family's suffering. Attorneys representing the family also criticized the growing expense of Robinson's publicly funded defense, which they claimed had already generated approximately $1.6 million in legal bills. Prosecutors have alleged that Robinson targeted Kirk because of his political and social views, pointing to text messages and other evidence they believe establish his motive. Robinson's defense attorneys have challenged the reliability of the prosecution's video and DNA evidence while disputing allegations concerning his motivations. Robinson has pleaded not guilty, and prosecutors are seeking the death penalty, which could potentially be carried out by firing squad under Utah law. With the trial now scheduled for the summer of 2028, the proceedings are expected to involve extensive legal arguments over forensic evidence, jury selection, potential sentencing, and whether Robinson can receive a fair trial amid the extraordinary publicity surrounding Kirk's assassination.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Trial date set for Tyler Robinson, accused assassin of Charlie Kirk

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>733breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-usvi-pushes-back-on-the-epstein-estates-attempt-to-remove-the-liens-11-10-26--76288386
The co-executors also accused the Virgin Islands government of pursuing an unnecessarily aggressive legal strategy that could undermine efforts to compensate Epstein’s sexual abuse victims. Central to their argument was the proposed Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program, a voluntary claims resolution system being developed by independent administrators Jordana Feldman, Kenneth Feinberg, and Camille Biros. The estate maintained that the program would allow survivors to seek financial compensation through a confidential process without immediately pursuing litigation and that participants would retain their legal rights unless they accepted an award and signed a release. Indyke and Kahn emphasized that the estate would have no authority to modify or reject compensation decisions made by the independent administrator and that no predetermined cap would limit individual awards. According to the filing, dozens of potential claimants had already expressed interest, while five individuals had voluntarily paused their lawsuits to explore participation. The executors argued that the Virgin Islands government's attempt to seize control of estate assets could jeopardize this compensation process, force survivors into prolonged litigation, and drain resources that could otherwise be available for settlements. They also criticized the government's proposal for a separate claims process, describing it as duplicative and potentially wasteful. Ultimately, Indyke and Kahn asked the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands to invalidate the government's liens and allow them to continue administering Epstein’s estate without interference. The document represented the estate's legal arguments rather than a judicial determination that the government's actions were unlawful.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76288386Tue, 10 Nov 2026 23:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn a supplemental brief filed on January 31, 2020, Jeffrey Epstein’s estate co-executors, Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, challenged the U.S. Virgin Islands government's efforts to impose criminal activity liens on assets belonging to Epstein’s estate...
The co-executors also accused the Virgin Islands government of pursuing an unnecessarily aggressive legal strategy that could undermine efforts to compensate Epstein’s sexual abuse victims. Central to their argument was the proposed Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program, a voluntary claims resolution system being developed by independent administrators Jordana Feldman, Kenneth Feinberg, and Camille Biros. The estate maintained that the program would allow survivors to seek financial compensation through a confidential process without immediately pursuing litigation and that participants would retain their legal rights unless they accepted an award and signed a release. Indyke and Kahn emphasized that the estate would have no authority to modify or reject compensation decisions made by the independent administrator and that no predetermined cap would limit individual awards. According to the filing, dozens of potential claimants had already expressed interest, while five individuals had voluntarily paused their lawsuits to explore participation. The executors argued that the Virgin Islands government's attempt to seize control of estate assets could jeopardize this compensation process, force survivors into prolonged litigation, and drain resources that could otherwise be available for settlements. They also criticized the government's proposal for a separate claims process, describing it as duplicative and potentially wasteful. Ultimately, Indyke and Kahn asked the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands to invalidate the government's liens and allow them to continue administering Epstein’s estate without interference. The document represented the estate's legal arguments rather than a judicial determination that the government's actions were unlawful.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1222epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-maxwell-trial-transcripts-kate-describes-her-relationship-with-ghislaine-maxwell-part-3-11-10-26--76274269
Kate's testimony provided prosecutors with evidence of Maxwell's alleged methods of cultivating relationships with vulnerable young women, gaining their trust, and gradually introducing them to sexual activity with Epstein. She explained that her admiration for Maxwell and desire for acceptance made it difficult to recognize the exploitation she was experiencing, while her fear of Epstein and Maxwell's powerful connections contributed to her continued association with them. Kate acknowledged maintaining contact with Epstein for years afterward, explaining that distancing herself would have forced her to confront what had happened. During cross-examination, Maxwell's defense attorneys attempted to undermine her credibility by questioning her history of substance abuse, continued communications with Epstein, and a $3.25 million settlement she received through an Epstein victims' compensation arrangement. Kate rejected suggestions that her substance use had distorted her recollection of the significant events she described. Because she was above the applicable age of consent during the alleged encounters, Judge Alison Nathan instructed jurors that Kate was not a victim of the offenses charged against Maxwell and that her testimony could not independently establish Maxwell's guilt. Nevertheless, prosecutors presented her account as evidence of the broader pattern of recruitment and grooming they alleged Maxwell employed to facilitate Epstein's sexual exploitation of young women and underage girls.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Ghislaine Maxwell Trial Transcript, 12.6.21

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76274269Tue, 10 Nov 2026 21:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDuring the 2021 federal sex trafficking trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, a British woman testifying under the pseudonym "Kate" described how Maxwell allegedly groomed her for sexual encounters with Jeffrey Epstein after they met in Paris in 1994, when Kate...
Kate's testimony provided prosecutors with evidence of Maxwell's alleged methods of cultivating relationships with vulnerable young women, gaining their trust, and gradually introducing them to sexual activity with Epstein. She explained that her admiration for Maxwell and desire for acceptance made it difficult to recognize the exploitation she was experiencing, while her fear of Epstein and Maxwell's powerful connections contributed to her continued association with them. Kate acknowledged maintaining contact with Epstein for years afterward, explaining that distancing herself would have forced her to confront what had happened. During cross-examination, Maxwell's defense attorneys attempted to undermine her credibility by questioning her history of substance abuse, continued communications with Epstein, and a $3.25 million settlement she received through an Epstein victims' compensation arrangement. Kate rejected suggestions that her substance use had distorted her recollection of the significant events she described. Because she was above the applicable age of consent during the alleged encounters, Judge Alison Nathan instructed jurors that Kate was not a victim of the offenses charged against Maxwell and that her testimony could not independently establish Maxwell's guilt. Nevertheless, prosecutors presented her account as evidence of the broader pattern of recruitment and grooming they alleged Maxwell employed to facilitate Epstein's sexual exploitation of young women and underage girls.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Ghislaine Maxwell Trial Transcript, 12.6.21

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>739epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-maxwell-trial-transcripts-kate-describes-her-relationship-with-ghislaine-maxwell-part-2-11-10-26--76274268
Kate's testimony provided prosecutors with evidence of Maxwell's alleged methods of cultivating relationships with vulnerable young women, gaining their trust, and gradually introducing them to sexual activity with Epstein. She explained that her admiration for Maxwell and desire for acceptance made it difficult to recognize the exploitation she was experiencing, while her fear of Epstein and Maxwell's powerful connections contributed to her continued association with them. Kate acknowledged maintaining contact with Epstein for years afterward, explaining that distancing herself would have forced her to confront what had happened. During cross-examination, Maxwell's defense attorneys attempted to undermine her credibility by questioning her history of substance abuse, continued communications with Epstein, and a $3.25 million settlement she received through an Epstein victims' compensation arrangement. Kate rejected suggestions that her substance use had distorted her recollection of the significant events she described. Because she was above the applicable age of consent during the alleged encounters, Judge Alison Nathan instructed jurors that Kate was not a victim of the offenses charged against Maxwell and that her testimony could not independently establish Maxwell's guilt. Nevertheless, prosecutors presented her account as evidence of the broader pattern of recruitment and grooming they alleged Maxwell employed to facilitate Epstein's sexual exploitation of young women and underage girls.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Ghislaine Maxwell Trial Transcript, 12.6.21

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76274268Tue, 10 Nov 2026 19:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDuring the 2021 federal sex trafficking trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, a British woman testifying under the pseudonym "Kate" described how Maxwell allegedly groomed her for sexual encounters with Jeffrey Epstein after they met in Paris in 1994, when Kate...
Kate's testimony provided prosecutors with evidence of Maxwell's alleged methods of cultivating relationships with vulnerable young women, gaining their trust, and gradually introducing them to sexual activity with Epstein. She explained that her admiration for Maxwell and desire for acceptance made it difficult to recognize the exploitation she was experiencing, while her fear of Epstein and Maxwell's powerful connections contributed to her continued association with them. Kate acknowledged maintaining contact with Epstein for years afterward, explaining that distancing herself would have forced her to confront what had happened. During cross-examination, Maxwell's defense attorneys attempted to undermine her credibility by questioning her history of substance abuse, continued communications with Epstein, and a $3.25 million settlement she received through an Epstein victims' compensation arrangement. Kate rejected suggestions that her substance use had distorted her recollection of the significant events she described. Because she was above the applicable age of consent during the alleged encounters, Judge Alison Nathan instructed jurors that Kate was not a victim of the offenses charged against Maxwell and that her testimony could not independently establish Maxwell's guilt. Nevertheless, prosecutors presented her account as evidence of the broader pattern of recruitment and grooming they alleged Maxwell employed to facilitate Epstein's sexual exploitation of young women and underage girls.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Ghislaine Maxwell Trial Transcript, 12.6.21

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>708epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-maxwell-trial-transcripts-kate-describes-her-relationship-with-ghislaine-maxwell-part-1-11-10-26--76274272
Kate's testimony provided prosecutors with evidence of Maxwell's alleged methods of cultivating relationships with vulnerable young women, gaining their trust, and gradually introducing them to sexual activity with Epstein. She explained that her admiration for Maxwell and desire for acceptance made it difficult to recognize the exploitation she was experiencing, while her fear of Epstein and Maxwell's powerful connections contributed to her continued association with them. Kate acknowledged maintaining contact with Epstein for years afterward, explaining that distancing herself would have forced her to confront what had happened. During cross-examination, Maxwell's defense attorneys attempted to undermine her credibility by questioning her history of substance abuse, continued communications with Epstein, and a $3.25 million settlement she received through an Epstein victims' compensation arrangement. Kate rejected suggestions that her substance use had distorted her recollection of the significant events she described. Because she was above the applicable age of consent during the alleged encounters, Judge Alison Nathan instructed jurors that Kate was not a victim of the offenses charged against Maxwell and that her testimony could not independently establish Maxwell's guilt. Nevertheless, prosecutors presented her account as evidence of the broader pattern of recruitment and grooming they alleged Maxwell employed to facilitate Epstein's sexual exploitation of young women and underage girls.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Ghislaine Maxwell Trial Transcript, 12.6.21

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76274272Tue, 10 Nov 2026 17:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDuring the 2021 federal sex trafficking trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, a British woman testifying under the pseudonym "Kate" described how Maxwell allegedly groomed her for sexual encounters with Jeffrey Epstein after they met in Paris in 1994, when Kate...
Kate's testimony provided prosecutors with evidence of Maxwell's alleged methods of cultivating relationships with vulnerable young women, gaining their trust, and gradually introducing them to sexual activity with Epstein. She explained that her admiration for Maxwell and desire for acceptance made it difficult to recognize the exploitation she was experiencing, while her fear of Epstein and Maxwell's powerful connections contributed to her continued association with them. Kate acknowledged maintaining contact with Epstein for years afterward, explaining that distancing herself would have forced her to confront what had happened. During cross-examination, Maxwell's defense attorneys attempted to undermine her credibility by questioning her history of substance abuse, continued communications with Epstein, and a $3.25 million settlement she received through an Epstein victims' compensation arrangement. Kate rejected suggestions that her substance use had distorted her recollection of the significant events she described. Because she was above the applicable age of consent during the alleged encounters, Judge Alison Nathan instructed jurors that Kate was not a victim of the offenses charged against Maxwell and that her testimony could not independently establish Maxwell's guilt. Nevertheless, prosecutors presented her account as evidence of the broader pattern of recruitment and grooming they alleged Maxwell employed to facilitate Epstein's sexual exploitation of young women and underage girls.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Ghislaine Maxwell Trial Transcript, 12.6.21

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>652epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-coverup-of-the-coverup-how-epstein-and-iran-cost-trump-the-midterms-part-2-11-10-26--76274271
By election day, the administration was confronting a perfect storm of public anger over the Iran war, rising costs, government accountability, and the continuing controversy surrounding Jeffrey Epstein. Democrats capitalized on those failures, delivering a sweeping electoral defeat that stripped Republicans of their congressional majorities and exposed the enormous political cost of the administration's decisions. Although the claim that Iran was attacked to distract from Epstein remains an unproven theory, the timing and political circumstances raise legitimate questions about whether domestic considerations influenced the decision to go to war. The incoming Democratic congressional majorities now have an opportunity to investigate both the handling of the Epstein files and the administration's justification for military action, including whether political calculations played any role in the escalation. The bitter irony is that an administration already drowning in criticism over its handling of Epstein may have embraced a military confrontation partly to escape that scrutiny, only to create an even larger disaster. If that theory is substantiated, the war that was supposed to rescue Trump from the Epstein debacle may ultimately be remembered as the decision that helped destroy his party's political power, turning an attempted distraction into a spectacular act of political self-destruction.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76274271Tue, 10 Nov 2026 15:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe Republican Party's crushing defeat in the 2026 midterm elections has been widely attributed to the disastrous war in Iran, with Vice President JD Vance and other administration officials acknowledging the conflict's devastating political...
By election day, the administration was confronting a perfect storm of public anger over the Iran war, rising costs, government accountability, and the continuing controversy surrounding Jeffrey Epstein. Democrats capitalized on those failures, delivering a sweeping electoral defeat that stripped Republicans of their congressional majorities and exposed the enormous political cost of the administration's decisions. Although the claim that Iran was attacked to distract from Epstein remains an unproven theory, the timing and political circumstances raise legitimate questions about whether domestic considerations influenced the decision to go to war. The incoming Democratic congressional majorities now have an opportunity to investigate both the handling of the Epstein files and the administration's justification for military action, including whether political calculations played any role in the escalation. The bitter irony is that an administration already drowning in criticism over its handling of Epstein may have embraced a military confrontation partly to escape that scrutiny, only to create an even larger disaster. If that theory is substantiated, the war that was supposed to rescue Trump from the Epstein debacle may ultimately be remembered as the decision that helped destroy his party's political power, turning an attempted distraction into a spectacular act of political self-destruction.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1291epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-coverup-of-the-coverup-how-epstein-and-iran-cost-trump-the-midterms-part-1-11-10-26--76274270
By election day, the administration was confronting a perfect storm of public anger over the Iran war, rising costs, government accountability, and the continuing controversy surrounding Jeffrey Epstein. Democrats capitalized on those failures, delivering a sweeping electoral defeat that stripped Republicans of their congressional majorities and exposed the enormous political cost of the administration's decisions. Although the claim that Iran was attacked to distract from Epstein remains an unproven theory, the timing and political circumstances raise legitimate questions about whether domestic considerations influenced the decision to go to war. The incoming Democratic congressional majorities now have an opportunity to investigate both the handling of the Epstein files and the administration's justification for military action, including whether political calculations played any role in the escalation. The bitter irony is that an administration already drowning in criticism over its handling of Epstein may have embraced a military confrontation partly to escape that scrutiny, only to create an even larger disaster. If that theory is substantiated, the war that was supposed to rescue Trump from the Epstein debacle may ultimately be remembered as the decision that helped destroy his party's political power, turning an attempted distraction into a spectacular act of political self-destruction.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76274270Tue, 10 Nov 2026 13:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe Republican Party's crushing defeat in the 2026 midterm elections has been widely attributed to the disastrous war in Iran, with Vice President JD Vance and other administration officials acknowledging the conflict's devastating political...
By election day, the administration was confronting a perfect storm of public anger over the Iran war, rising costs, government accountability, and the continuing controversy surrounding Jeffrey Epstein. Democrats capitalized on those failures, delivering a sweeping electoral defeat that stripped Republicans of their congressional majorities and exposed the enormous political cost of the administration's decisions. Although the claim that Iran was attacked to distract from Epstein remains an unproven theory, the timing and political circumstances raise legitimate questions about whether domestic considerations influenced the decision to go to war. The incoming Democratic congressional majorities now have an opportunity to investigate both the handling of the Epstein files and the administration's justification for military action, including whether political calculations played any role in the escalation. The bitter irony is that an administration already drowning in criticism over its handling of Epstein may have embraced a military confrontation partly to escape that scrutiny, only to create an even larger disaster. If that theory is substantiated, the war that was supposed to rescue Trump from the Epstein debacle may ultimately be remembered as the decision that helped destroy his party's political power, turning an attempted distraction into a spectacular act of political self-destruction.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>638epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-inside-the-white-house-fallout-over-the-epstein-files-11-10-26--76272336
The larger problem is that Epstein remains a trust-destroying scandal because the public has never believed the government gave a full accounting of who enabled him, who benefited from him, and who was protected when the system closed ranks. The White House tried to contain the issue, but the response only deepened the perception that powerful names were still being shielded. With Congress continuing to demand answers, major figures like Bill Gates being pulled into closed-door questioning, and polling showing broad public skepticism, the Epstein files have become more than a legal matter. They are now a political grenade, exposing the gap between campaign promises, institutional self-protection, and the public’s belief that elite accountability is still mostly theater.






to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Inside Trump’s White House, the Epstein Files Caused a Freakout - The New York Times

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76272336Tue, 10 Nov 2026 11:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciThe Trump administration’s handling of the Epstein files has become a political disaster because years of promises about transparency ran headfirst into the Justice Department’s refusal to back the most explosive public expectations. Senior White...
The larger problem is that Epstein remains a trust-destroying scandal because the public has never believed the government gave a full accounting of who enabled him, who benefited from him, and who was protected when the system closed ranks. The White House tried to contain the issue, but the response only deepened the perception that powerful names were still being shielded. With Congress continuing to demand answers, major figures like Bill Gates being pulled into closed-door questioning, and polling showing broad public skepticism, the Epstein files have become more than a legal matter. They are now a political grenade, exposing the gap between campaign promises, institutional self-protection, and the public’s belief that elite accountability is still mostly theater.






to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Inside Trump’s White House, the Epstein Files Caused a Freakout - The New York Times

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>4328epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-hillary-clinton-and-her-epstein-related-talk-with-congress-part-15-16-11-10-26--76272338Hillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met Epstein, never flew on his plane, never visited Little St. James and knew nothing about his crimes before they became public. She described Maxwell as no more than a “casual acquaintance,” said she did not consider her a friend and attributed Maxwell’s presence around the Clinton family largely to her relationship with longtime Clinton friend Ted Waitt. Clinton acknowledged that Maxwell attended Chelsea Clinton’s 2010 wedding, but said she had no specific recollection of speaking with her there and believed Maxwell attended as Waitt’s guest. She also said she did not remember Maxwell visiting the Clintons’ Chappaqua home, despite Maxwell later saying she had been there several times, and said she had no knowledge of Epstein having connections to American or foreign intelligence services.

The questioning became much more contentious when lawmakers turned to Bill Clinton’s documented relationship with Epstein. Hillary characterized her husband’s relationship with Epstein as “limited” and primarily connected to his use of Epstein’s airplane, said she had no knowledge of Bill visiting Little St. James and maintained there was no evidence connecting him to Epstein’s crimes. When lawmakers pressed her about photographs showing Bill Clinton with Epstein, Maxwell and young women during trips, Clinton acknowledged seeing some of those photographs but said she had not become curious enough to investigate the circumstances herself, calling it simply “unfortunate” that her husband ever had dealings with Epstein. She also denied personally soliciting money from Epstein and said she was unaware of anyone doing so on her behalf, while acknowledging she knew little about whether Epstein played any role around Clinton Foundation or Clinton Global Initiative activities. The transcript therefore presented a consistent Clinton defense: she said she personally had essentially no relationship with Epstein and only a peripheral relationship with Maxwell, while repeatedly separating herself from questions about Bill Clinton by telling lawmakers that he would have to answer for his own conduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76272338Tue, 10 Nov 2026 09:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciHillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met...Hillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met Epstein, never flew on his plane, never visited Little St. James and knew nothing about his crimes before they became public. She described Maxwell as no more than a “casual acquaintance,” said she did not consider her a friend and attributed Maxwell’s presence around the Clinton family largely to her relationship with longtime Clinton friend Ted Waitt. Clinton acknowledged that Maxwell attended Chelsea Clinton’s 2010 wedding, but said she had no specific recollection of speaking with her there and believed Maxwell attended as Waitt’s guest. She also said she did not remember Maxwell visiting the Clintons’ Chappaqua home, despite Maxwell later saying she had been there several times, and said she had no knowledge of Epstein having connections to American or foreign intelligence services.

The questioning became much more contentious when lawmakers turned to Bill Clinton’s documented relationship with Epstein. Hillary characterized her husband’s relationship with Epstein as “limited” and primarily connected to his use of Epstein’s airplane, said she had no knowledge of Bill visiting Little St. James and maintained there was no evidence connecting him to Epstein’s crimes. When lawmakers pressed her about photographs showing Bill Clinton with Epstein, Maxwell and young women during trips, Clinton acknowledged seeing some of those photographs but said she had not become curious enough to investigate the circumstances herself, calling it simply “unfortunate” that her husband ever had dealings with Epstein. She also denied personally soliciting money from Epstein and said she was unaware of anyone doing so on her behalf, while acknowledging she knew little about whether Epstein played any role around Clinton Foundation or Clinton Global Initiative activities. The transcript therefore presented a consistent Clinton defense: she said she personally had essentially no relationship with Epstein and only a peripheral relationship with Maxwell, while repeatedly separating herself from questions about Bill Clinton by telling lawmakers that he would have to answer for his own conduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3163epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-hillary-clinton-and-her-epstein-related-talk-with-congress-part-12-14-11-9-26--76272337Hillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met Epstein, never flew on his plane, never visited Little St. James and knew nothing about his crimes before they became public. She described Maxwell as no more than a “casual acquaintance,” said she did not consider her a friend and attributed Maxwell’s presence around the Clinton family largely to her relationship with longtime Clinton friend Ted Waitt. Clinton acknowledged that Maxwell attended Chelsea Clinton’s 2010 wedding, but said she had no specific recollection of speaking with her there and believed Maxwell attended as Waitt’s guest. She also said she did not remember Maxwell visiting the Clintons’ Chappaqua home, despite Maxwell later saying she had been there several times, and said she had no knowledge of Epstein having connections to American or foreign intelligence services.

The questioning became much more contentious when lawmakers turned to Bill Clinton’s documented relationship with Epstein. Hillary characterized her husband’s relationship with Epstein as “limited” and primarily connected to his use of Epstein’s airplane, said she had no knowledge of Bill visiting Little St. James and maintained there was no evidence connecting him to Epstein’s crimes. When lawmakers pressed her about photographs showing Bill Clinton with Epstein, Maxwell and young women during trips, Clinton acknowledged seeing some of those photographs but said she had not become curious enough to investigate the circumstances herself, calling it simply “unfortunate” that her husband ever had dealings with Epstein. She also denied personally soliciting money from Epstein and said she was unaware of anyone doing so on her behalf, while acknowledging she knew little about whether Epstein played any role around Clinton Foundation or Clinton Global Initiative activities. The transcript therefore presented a consistent Clinton defense: she said she personally had essentially no relationship with Epstein and only a peripheral relationship with Maxwell, while repeatedly separating herself from questions about Bill Clinton by telling lawmakers that he would have to answer for his own conduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76272337Tue, 10 Nov 2026 07:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciHillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met...Hillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met Epstein, never flew on his plane, never visited Little St. James and knew nothing about his crimes before they became public. She described Maxwell as no more than a “casual acquaintance,” said she did not consider her a friend and attributed Maxwell’s presence around the Clinton family largely to her relationship with longtime Clinton friend Ted Waitt. Clinton acknowledged that Maxwell attended Chelsea Clinton’s 2010 wedding, but said she had no specific recollection of speaking with her there and believed Maxwell attended as Waitt’s guest. She also said she did not remember Maxwell visiting the Clintons’ Chappaqua home, despite Maxwell later saying she had been there several times, and said she had no knowledge of Epstein having connections to American or foreign intelligence services.

The questioning became much more contentious when lawmakers turned to Bill Clinton’s documented relationship with Epstein. Hillary characterized her husband’s relationship with Epstein as “limited” and primarily connected to his use of Epstein’s airplane, said she had no knowledge of Bill visiting Little St. James and maintained there was no evidence connecting him to Epstein’s crimes. When lawmakers pressed her about photographs showing Bill Clinton with Epstein, Maxwell and young women during trips, Clinton acknowledged seeing some of those photographs but said she had not become curious enough to investigate the circumstances herself, calling it simply “unfortunate” that her husband ever had dealings with Epstein. She also denied personally soliciting money from Epstein and said she was unaware of anyone doing so on her behalf, while acknowledging she knew little about whether Epstein played any role around Clinton Foundation or Clinton Global Initiative activities. The transcript therefore presented a consistent Clinton defense: she said she personally had essentially no relationship with Epstein and only a peripheral relationship with Maxwell, while repeatedly separating herself from questions about Bill Clinton by telling lawmakers that he would have to answer for his own conduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2964breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,cartel,cartelnews,chapitos,cjng,elchapo,elmayo,elmayozambada,jaliscocartel,loschapitos,mayitos,mexico,narcos,news,occ,organizedcrime,rico,sinaloacartel,zambadatruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-dea-agent-who-broke-bad--76273193








Former Drug Enforcement Administration supervisory agent Nathan Koen was sentenced to 135 months, or 11 years and three months, in federal prison on May 11, 2022, after pleading guilty to accepting bribes from a major drug trafficker in exchange for providing sensitive law enforcement information and protection. Koen, who had worked for the DEA since 2002 and served as a group supervisor in Little Rock, Arkansas, was accused of helping a trafficking organization avoid detection while it distributed significant quantities of methamphetamine, cocaine, heroin, fentanyl, and marijuana across multiple states. Federal prosecutors originally charged him in November 2019 with bribery and conspiracy to distribute controlled substances, but the drug conspiracy charge was dismissed after he pleaded guilty to bribery in August 2021. During sentencing, U.S. District Judge Brian Miller determined that Koen had accepted payments to facilitate a drug conspiracy involving between 15 and 45 kilograms of methamphetamine. Investigators established that the trafficker, who had initially developed a relationship with Koen while acting as a DEA informant, subsequently resumed large-scale drug distribution while paying the federal agent for protection. Before cooperating with the FBI, the trafficker had provided Koen with approximately $31,500 in bribes, effectively turning a federal narcotics investigator into an asset for the criminal organization he had been entrusted to combat.

The corruption scheme unraveled in 2018 when the FBI began investigating Koen and enlisted the cooperation of the drug trafficker who had been paying him. On December 3, 2018, investigators arranged a controlled bribe payment in Las Vegas, supplying the informant with $9,000 in cash and recording equipment. Koen met the informant near the Bellagio hotel before accompanying him to the Paris Las Vegas hotel, where they entered a bathroom away from surveillance cameras and the informant placed the money inside Koen's backpack. During their recorded conversation, Koen asked whether the payment was worthwhile and warned the trafficker to dispose of his phones and change his address because he anticipated that authorities would soon execute a search warrant at his residence. Federal agents arrested Koen after he returned to Arkansas that same day, and he admitted accepting bribes. Prosecutors condemned his actions as a profound betrayal of public trust, emphasizing that he had used his position to protect a criminal enterprise responsible for distributing enormous quantities of dangerous narcotics. DEA Administrator Anne Milgram and FBI officials similarly criticized Koen for placing personal financial interests ahead of his responsibilities as a federal law enforcement officer. In addition to his prison sentence, Judge Miller imposed two years of supervised release, bringing an end to a corruption prosecution that exposed how a senior DEA agent had exploited his authority to assist the very drug traffickers he was supposed to investigate.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com










Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76273193Tue, 10 Nov 2026 05:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciFormer Drug Enforcement Administration supervisory agent Nathan Koen was sentenced to 135 months, or 11 years and three months, in federal prison on May 11, 2022, after pleading guilty to accepting bribes from a major drug trafficker in exchange for...








Former Drug Enforcement Administration supervisory agent Nathan Koen was sentenced to 135 months, or 11 years and three months, in federal prison on May 11, 2022, after pleading guilty to accepting bribes from a major drug trafficker in exchange for providing sensitive law enforcement information and protection. Koen, who had worked for the DEA since 2002 and served as a group supervisor in Little Rock, Arkansas, was accused of helping a trafficking organization avoid detection while it distributed significant quantities of methamphetamine, cocaine, heroin, fentanyl, and marijuana across multiple states. Federal prosecutors originally charged him in November 2019 with bribery and conspiracy to distribute controlled substances, but the drug conspiracy charge was dismissed after he pleaded guilty to bribery in August 2021. During sentencing, U.S. District Judge Brian Miller determined that Koen had accepted payments to facilitate a drug conspiracy involving between 15 and 45 kilograms of methamphetamine. Investigators established that the trafficker, who had initially developed a relationship with Koen while acting as a DEA informant, subsequently resumed large-scale drug distribution while paying the federal agent for protection. Before cooperating with the FBI, the trafficker had provided Koen with approximately $31,500 in bribes, effectively turning a federal narcotics investigator into an asset for the criminal organization he had been entrusted to combat.

The corruption scheme unraveled in 2018 when the FBI began investigating Koen and enlisted the cooperation of the drug trafficker who had been paying him. On December 3, 2018, investigators arranged a controlled bribe payment in Las Vegas, supplying the informant with $9,000 in cash and recording equipment. Koen met the informant near the Bellagio hotel before accompanying him to the Paris Las Vegas hotel, where they entered a bathroom away from surveillance cameras and the informant placed the money inside Koen's backpack. During their recorded conversation, Koen asked whether the payment was worthwhile and warned the trafficker to dispose of his phones and change his address because he anticipated that authorities would soon execute a search warrant at his residence. Federal agents arrested Koen after he returned to Arkansas that same day, and he admitted accepting bribes. Prosecutors condemned his actions as a profound betrayal of public trust, emphasizing that he had used his position to protect a criminal enterprise responsible for distributing enormous quantities of dangerous narcotics. DEA Administrator Anne Milgram and FBI officials similarly criticized Koen for placing personal financial interests ahead of his responsibilities as a federal law enforcement officer. In addition to his prison sentence, Judge Miller imposed two years of supervised release, bringing an end to a corruption prosecution that exposed how a senior DEA agent had exploited his authority to assist the very drug traffickers he was supposed to investigate.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com










Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>899breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,cartel,cartelnews,chapitos,cjng,elchapo,elmayo,elmayozambada,jaliscocartel,loschapitos,mayitos,mexico,narcos,news,occ,organizedcrime,rico,sinaloacartel,zambadatruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/el-chapo-has-a-few-things-to-say-about-the-conditions-at-the-super-max-in-colorado--76273192

Guzmán's complaints have extended beyond his physical accommodations to the severe restrictions placed on his communication with family members, attorneys, and the outside world. He has repeatedly requested additional telephone calls and visits with his wife, Emma Coronel, and their twin daughters, arguing that the isolation has damaged his mental health and deprived him of meaningful family relationships. In April 2024, federal Judge Brian Cogan rejected his request for expanded family contact, explaining that the Bureau of Prisons, rather than the sentencing court, controlled the conditions of his confinement. Guzmán also filed a civil rights lawsuit in Colorado in July 2024 challenging his treatment, alleging that repeated nighttime disturbances, inadequate medical care, and prolonged solitary confinement had caused significant physical and psychological suffering. That lawsuit was dismissed in June 2026, although his attorney indicated that another complaint could be filed. In additional correspondence during 2026, Guzmán requested that he be returned to Mexico and continued protesting restrictions on legal visits, educational opportunities, and communication privileges. His complaints have drawn particular attention because of the contrast between his former position as a billionaire drug kingpin who twice escaped high-security Mexican prisons and his current existence in one of America's most restrictive correctional institutions. Federal authorities have remained reluctant to relax the security arrangements, particularly given concerns about his ability to maintain contact with members of the Sinaloa cartel. Despite years of letters, legal challenges, and appeals for improved treatment, Guzmán has remained incarcerated under extraordinarily restrictive conditions, with little indication that the federal government intends to substantially change his accommodations.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76273192Tue, 10 Nov 2026 03:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciJoaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán, the former leader of Mexico's Sinaloa cartel, has spent years complaining about the harsh conditions of his imprisonment at ADX Florence, the federal supermax facility in Colorado where he has been serving a life sentence...

Guzmán's complaints have extended beyond his physical accommodations to the severe restrictions placed on his communication with family members, attorneys, and the outside world. He has repeatedly requested additional telephone calls and visits with his wife, Emma Coronel, and their twin daughters, arguing that the isolation has damaged his mental health and deprived him of meaningful family relationships. In April 2024, federal Judge Brian Cogan rejected his request for expanded family contact, explaining that the Bureau of Prisons, rather than the sentencing court, controlled the conditions of his confinement. Guzmán also filed a civil rights lawsuit in Colorado in July 2024 challenging his treatment, alleging that repeated nighttime disturbances, inadequate medical care, and prolonged solitary confinement had caused significant physical and psychological suffering. That lawsuit was dismissed in June 2026, although his attorney indicated that another complaint could be filed. In additional correspondence during 2026, Guzmán requested that he be returned to Mexico and continued protesting restrictions on legal visits, educational opportunities, and communication privileges. His complaints have drawn particular attention because of the contrast between his former position as a billionaire drug kingpin who twice escaped high-security Mexican prisons and his current existence in one of America's most restrictive correctional institutions. Federal authorities have remained reluctant to relax the security arrangements, particularly given concerns about his ability to maintain contact with members of the Sinaloa cartel. Despite years of letters, legal challenges, and appeals for improved treatment, Guzmán has remained incarcerated under extraordinarily restrictive conditions, with little indication that the federal government intends to substantially change his accommodations.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: 796breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,cartel,cartelnews,chapitos,cjng,elchapo,elmayo,elmayozambada,jaliscocartel,loschapitos,mayitos,mexico,narcos,news,occ,organizedcrime,rico,sinaloacartel,zambadatruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-doj-and-their-motion-to-dismiss-the-epstein-survivors-4th-amended-complaint-part-4-11-9-26--76269976
The Justice Department's central defense rested on sovereign immunity and the discretionary function exception, which generally protects the federal government from lawsuits challenging certain decisions made by investigators and prosecutors. Government attorneys argued that FBI agents possessed broad discretion over which allegations to investigate, which witnesses to interview, and whether to pursue criminal charges, even when those decisions resulted in alleged investigative failures. The motion specifically challenged allegations involving warnings from Maria Farmer and Audra Christiansen, maintaining that the FBI's failure to follow up did not establish an enforceable legal duty or reasonable reliance by the victims. The DOJ further argued that prosecutors' decisions surrounding Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement were protected from judicial review, even acknowledging that the Eleventh Circuit had previously criticized the government's handling of that agreement. In another procedural challenge, the government sought dismissal of three Jane Doe plaintiffs because their administrative claims allegedly failed to specify the monetary damages required under federal law. Ultimately, the DOJ requested dismissal of the entire lawsuit without allowing another amended complaint, arguing that the survivors had repeatedly failed to establish jurisdiction or a viable negligence claim. The filing represented an effort by the federal government to defeat the survivors' attempt to hold federal authorities financially and legally accountable for their handling of Epstein, without requiring a trial examining the full extent of those investigative failures.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.flsd.693362.110.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76269976Tue, 10 Nov 2026 01:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciThe United States Department of Justice filed a motion on June 4, 2026, asking a federal judge in the Southern District of Florida to dismiss a lawsuit brought by 34 Jeffrey Epstein survivors who accused the FBI and DOJ of negligence that allowed...
The Justice Department's central defense rested on sovereign immunity and the discretionary function exception, which generally protects the federal government from lawsuits challenging certain decisions made by investigators and prosecutors. Government attorneys argued that FBI agents possessed broad discretion over which allegations to investigate, which witnesses to interview, and whether to pursue criminal charges, even when those decisions resulted in alleged investigative failures. The motion specifically challenged allegations involving warnings from Maria Farmer and Audra Christiansen, maintaining that the FBI's failure to follow up did not establish an enforceable legal duty or reasonable reliance by the victims. The DOJ further argued that prosecutors' decisions surrounding Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement were protected from judicial review, even acknowledging that the Eleventh Circuit had previously criticized the government's handling of that agreement. In another procedural challenge, the government sought dismissal of three Jane Doe plaintiffs because their administrative claims allegedly failed to specify the monetary damages required under federal law. Ultimately, the DOJ requested dismissal of the entire lawsuit without allowing another amended complaint, arguing that the survivors had repeatedly failed to establish jurisdiction or a viable negligence claim. The filing represented an effort by the federal government to defeat the survivors' attempt to hold federal authorities financially and legally accountable for their handling of Epstein, without requiring a trial examining the full extent of those investigative failures.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.flsd.693362.110.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>936epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-doj-and-their-motion-to-dismiss-the-epstein-survivors-4th-amended-complaint-part-3-11-9-26--76269977
The Justice Department's central defense rested on sovereign immunity and the discretionary function exception, which generally protects the federal government from lawsuits challenging certain decisions made by investigators and prosecutors. Government attorneys argued that FBI agents possessed broad discretion over which allegations to investigate, which witnesses to interview, and whether to pursue criminal charges, even when those decisions resulted in alleged investigative failures. The motion specifically challenged allegations involving warnings from Maria Farmer and Audra Christiansen, maintaining that the FBI's failure to follow up did not establish an enforceable legal duty or reasonable reliance by the victims. The DOJ further argued that prosecutors' decisions surrounding Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement were protected from judicial review, even acknowledging that the Eleventh Circuit had previously criticized the government's handling of that agreement. In another procedural challenge, the government sought dismissal of three Jane Doe plaintiffs because their administrative claims allegedly failed to specify the monetary damages required under federal law. Ultimately, the DOJ requested dismissal of the entire lawsuit without allowing another amended complaint, arguing that the survivors had repeatedly failed to establish jurisdiction or a viable negligence claim. The filing represented an effort by the federal government to defeat the survivors' attempt to hold federal authorities financially and legally accountable for their handling of Epstein, without requiring a trial examining the full extent of those investigative failures.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.flsd.693362.110.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76269977Mon, 09 Nov 2026 23:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe United States Department of Justice filed a motion on June 4, 2026, asking a federal judge in the Southern District of Florida to dismiss a lawsuit brought by 34 Jeffrey Epstein survivors who accused the FBI and DOJ of negligence that allowed...
The Justice Department's central defense rested on sovereign immunity and the discretionary function exception, which generally protects the federal government from lawsuits challenging certain decisions made by investigators and prosecutors. Government attorneys argued that FBI agents possessed broad discretion over which allegations to investigate, which witnesses to interview, and whether to pursue criminal charges, even when those decisions resulted in alleged investigative failures. The motion specifically challenged allegations involving warnings from Maria Farmer and Audra Christiansen, maintaining that the FBI's failure to follow up did not establish an enforceable legal duty or reasonable reliance by the victims. The DOJ further argued that prosecutors' decisions surrounding Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement were protected from judicial review, even acknowledging that the Eleventh Circuit had previously criticized the government's handling of that agreement. In another procedural challenge, the government sought dismissal of three Jane Doe plaintiffs because their administrative claims allegedly failed to specify the monetary damages required under federal law. Ultimately, the DOJ requested dismissal of the entire lawsuit without allowing another amended complaint, arguing that the survivors had repeatedly failed to establish jurisdiction or a viable negligence claim. The filing represented an effort by the federal government to defeat the survivors' attempt to hold federal authorities financially and legally accountable for their handling of Epstein, without requiring a trial examining the full extent of those investigative failures.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.flsd.693362.110.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>647epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-doj-and-their-motion-to-dismiss-the-epstein-survivors-4th-amended-complaint-part-2-11-9-26--76269975
The Justice Department's central defense rested on sovereign immunity and the discretionary function exception, which generally protects the federal government from lawsuits challenging certain decisions made by investigators and prosecutors. Government attorneys argued that FBI agents possessed broad discretion over which allegations to investigate, which witnesses to interview, and whether to pursue criminal charges, even when those decisions resulted in alleged investigative failures. The motion specifically challenged allegations involving warnings from Maria Farmer and Audra Christiansen, maintaining that the FBI's failure to follow up did not establish an enforceable legal duty or reasonable reliance by the victims. The DOJ further argued that prosecutors' decisions surrounding Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement were protected from judicial review, even acknowledging that the Eleventh Circuit had previously criticized the government's handling of that agreement. In another procedural challenge, the government sought dismissal of three Jane Doe plaintiffs because their administrative claims allegedly failed to specify the monetary damages required under federal law. Ultimately, the DOJ requested dismissal of the entire lawsuit without allowing another amended complaint, arguing that the survivors had repeatedly failed to establish jurisdiction or a viable negligence claim. The filing represented an effort by the federal government to defeat the survivors' attempt to hold federal authorities financially and legally accountable for their handling of Epstein, without requiring a trial examining the full extent of those investigative failures.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.flsd.693362.110.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76269975Mon, 09 Nov 2026 21:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe United States Department of Justice filed a motion on June 4, 2026, asking a federal judge in the Southern District of Florida to dismiss a lawsuit brought by 34 Jeffrey Epstein survivors who accused the FBI and DOJ of negligence that allowed...
The Justice Department's central defense rested on sovereign immunity and the discretionary function exception, which generally protects the federal government from lawsuits challenging certain decisions made by investigators and prosecutors. Government attorneys argued that FBI agents possessed broad discretion over which allegations to investigate, which witnesses to interview, and whether to pursue criminal charges, even when those decisions resulted in alleged investigative failures. The motion specifically challenged allegations involving warnings from Maria Farmer and Audra Christiansen, maintaining that the FBI's failure to follow up did not establish an enforceable legal duty or reasonable reliance by the victims. The DOJ further argued that prosecutors' decisions surrounding Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement were protected from judicial review, even acknowledging that the Eleventh Circuit had previously criticized the government's handling of that agreement. In another procedural challenge, the government sought dismissal of three Jane Doe plaintiffs because their administrative claims allegedly failed to specify the monetary damages required under federal law. Ultimately, the DOJ requested dismissal of the entire lawsuit without allowing another amended complaint, arguing that the survivors had repeatedly failed to establish jurisdiction or a viable negligence claim. The filing represented an effort by the federal government to defeat the survivors' attempt to hold federal authorities financially and legally accountable for their handling of Epstein, without requiring a trial examining the full extent of those investigative failures.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.flsd.693362.110.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>685epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-doj-and-their-motion-to-dismiss-the-epstein-survivors-4th-amended-complaint-part-1-11-9-26--76269974
The Justice Department's central defense rested on sovereign immunity and the discretionary function exception, which generally protects the federal government from lawsuits challenging certain decisions made by investigators and prosecutors. Government attorneys argued that FBI agents possessed broad discretion over which allegations to investigate, which witnesses to interview, and whether to pursue criminal charges, even when those decisions resulted in alleged investigative failures. The motion specifically challenged allegations involving warnings from Maria Farmer and Audra Christiansen, maintaining that the FBI's failure to follow up did not establish an enforceable legal duty or reasonable reliance by the victims. The DOJ further argued that prosecutors' decisions surrounding Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement were protected from judicial review, even acknowledging that the Eleventh Circuit had previously criticized the government's handling of that agreement. In another procedural challenge, the government sought dismissal of three Jane Doe plaintiffs because their administrative claims allegedly failed to specify the monetary damages required under federal law. Ultimately, the DOJ requested dismissal of the entire lawsuit without allowing another amended complaint, arguing that the survivors had repeatedly failed to establish jurisdiction or a viable negligence claim. The filing represented an effort by the federal government to defeat the survivors' attempt to hold federal authorities financially and legally accountable for their handling of Epstein, without requiring a trial examining the full extent of those investigative failures.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.flsd.693362.110.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76269974Mon, 09 Nov 2026 19:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe United States Department of Justice filed a motion on June 4, 2026, asking a federal judge in the Southern District of Florida to dismiss a lawsuit brought by 34 Jeffrey Epstein survivors who accused the FBI and DOJ of negligence that allowed...
The Justice Department's central defense rested on sovereign immunity and the discretionary function exception, which generally protects the federal government from lawsuits challenging certain decisions made by investigators and prosecutors. Government attorneys argued that FBI agents possessed broad discretion over which allegations to investigate, which witnesses to interview, and whether to pursue criminal charges, even when those decisions resulted in alleged investigative failures. The motion specifically challenged allegations involving warnings from Maria Farmer and Audra Christiansen, maintaining that the FBI's failure to follow up did not establish an enforceable legal duty or reasonable reliance by the victims. The DOJ further argued that prosecutors' decisions surrounding Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement were protected from judicial review, even acknowledging that the Eleventh Circuit had previously criticized the government's handling of that agreement. In another procedural challenge, the government sought dismissal of three Jane Doe plaintiffs because their administrative claims allegedly failed to specify the monetary damages required under federal law. Ultimately, the DOJ requested dismissal of the entire lawsuit without allowing another amended complaint, arguing that the survivors had repeatedly failed to establish jurisdiction or a viable negligence claim. The filing represented an effort by the federal government to defeat the survivors' attempt to hold federal authorities financially and legally accountable for their handling of Epstein, without requiring a trial examining the full extent of those investigative failures.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.flsd.693362.110.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>627epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/peter-mandelson-s-epstein-files-set-for-release-before-christmas-11-9-26--76267626
The forthcoming release is expected to provide additional insight into how Mandelson secured one of Britain's most important diplomatic appointments despite his longstanding association with Epstein and the controversy surrounding that relationship. Before publication, the documents will undergo a review to determine whether information must be redacted to protect national security or international relations, with Parliament's Intelligence and Security Committee permitted to examine unredacted material. Some records will remain withheld at the Metropolitan Police's request until investigators determine that disclosure will no longer jeopardize the criminal inquiry or subsequent legal proceedings. Earlier releases exposed troubling questions about the government's vetting procedures, including correspondence in which an official responsible for security clearance admitted uncertainty about the enhanced vetting system used for sensitive appointments. Other documents revealed Mandelson's private criticism of then-Prime Minister Keir Starmer and his Cabinet, adding to the political embarrassment surrounding his appointment. The Metropolitan Police confirmed that their investigation into alleged misconduct in public office remained active, while the government maintained that additional documents would be released when legally permissible. The continuing disclosure process has kept scrutiny focused on Mandelson's relationship with Epstein, the handling of sensitive government information, and the judgment of senior British officials who approved his appointment to Washington.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

More Peter Mandelson files will be released before Christmas as police continue probe into his links with Jeffrey Epstein | Daily Mail Online

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76267626Mon, 09 Nov 2026 17:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe British government is preparing to release another batch of documents concerning former UK ambassador to the United States Peter Mandelson and the circumstances surrounding his appointment, as London's Metropolitan Police continue investigating...
The forthcoming release is expected to provide additional insight into how Mandelson secured one of Britain's most important diplomatic appointments despite his longstanding association with Epstein and the controversy surrounding that relationship. Before publication, the documents will undergo a review to determine whether information must be redacted to protect national security or international relations, with Parliament's Intelligence and Security Committee permitted to examine unredacted material. Some records will remain withheld at the Metropolitan Police's request until investigators determine that disclosure will no longer jeopardize the criminal inquiry or subsequent legal proceedings. Earlier releases exposed troubling questions about the government's vetting procedures, including correspondence in which an official responsible for security clearance admitted uncertainty about the enhanced vetting system used for sensitive appointments. Other documents revealed Mandelson's private criticism of then-Prime Minister Keir Starmer and his Cabinet, adding to the political embarrassment surrounding his appointment. The Metropolitan Police confirmed that their investigation into alleged misconduct in public office remained active, while the government maintained that additional documents would be released when legally permissible. The continuing disclosure process has kept scrutiny focused on Mandelson's relationship with Epstein, the handling of sensitive government information, and the judgment of senior British officials who approved his appointment to Washington.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

More Peter Mandelson files will be released before Christmas as police continue probe into his links with Jeffrey Epstein | Daily Mail Online

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>635epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-order-shielding-todd-blanche-from-a-deposition-in-the-lawsuit-with-epstein-survivors-11-9-26--76235906

However, the ruling also delivered a significant, albeit limited, victory to the survivors by requiring Blanche to answer written questions concerning statements he allegedly made during a July 16, 2026, meeting with Epstein victims and their attorneys in Washington, D.C. According to sworn statements submitted by the plaintiffs, Blanche acknowledged that the FBI's investigation of Epstein had been mishandled before 2007 and allegedly told the survivors, "you got screwed over by the FBI, but I cannot fix the FBI's lack of investigation." Judge McCabe determined that these alleged admissions could be relevant to the government's potential liability and authorized the plaintiffs to submit up to ten written interrogatories directly to Blanche in his official capacity, with responses required within fifteen days of submission. The court also ordered the government to begin producing documents and answering outstanding discovery requests once a confidentiality agreement was established, while directing both sides to schedule the deposition of a designated government representative by November 11. Importantly, the judge left open the possibility that Blanche could eventually be compelled to testify if the survivors exhausted other discovery avenues and demonstrated extraordinary circumstances justifying his deposition. The ruling therefore temporarily protected Blanche from direct questioning while preserving a path for the plaintiffs to examine his alleged acknowledgment of the FBI's failures in handling Epstein



to contact me:


gov.uscourts.flsd.693362.150.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76235906Mon, 09 Nov 2026 15:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciA federal magistrate judge in the Southern District of Florida issued a November 5, 2026, ruling that partially shielded Attorney General Todd Blanche from being questioned under oath in a lawsuit brought by Jeffrey Epstein survivors against the...

However, the ruling also delivered a significant, albeit limited, victory to the survivors by requiring Blanche to answer written questions concerning statements he allegedly made during a July 16, 2026, meeting with Epstein victims and their attorneys in Washington, D.C. According to sworn statements submitted by the plaintiffs, Blanche acknowledged that the FBI's investigation of Epstein had been mishandled before 2007 and allegedly told the survivors, "you got screwed over by the FBI, but I cannot fix the FBI's lack of investigation." Judge McCabe determined that these alleged admissions could be relevant to the government's potential liability and authorized the plaintiffs to submit up to ten written interrogatories directly to Blanche in his official capacity, with responses required within fifteen days of submission. The court also ordered the government to begin producing documents and answering outstanding discovery requests once a confidentiality agreement was established, while directing both sides to schedule the deposition of a designated government representative by November 11. Importantly, the judge left open the possibility that Blanche could eventually be compelled to testify if the survivors exhausted other discovery avenues and demonstrated extraordinary circumstances justifying his deposition. The ruling therefore temporarily protected Blanche from direct questioning while preserving a path for the plaintiffs to examine his alleged acknowledgment of the FBI's failures in handling Epstein



to contact me:


gov.uscourts.flsd.693362.150.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>732epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/epstein-survivors-fight-doj-effort-to-block-todd-blanche-s-deposition-11-9-26--76235904

The filing also directly challenged the Justice Department's reliance on the apex doctrine, which generally protects high-ranking government officials from being compelled to testify in civil proceedings. The survivors' attorneys argued that the doctrine was not an absolute prohibition and cited federal court decisions allowing depositions of senior officials when exceptional circumstances, unique personal knowledge, or evidence of government misconduct justified their testimony. They further alleged that the Justice Department's handling of Epstein records, including accusations that survivors' identities had been exposed while alleged abusers' names remained redacted, supported additional scrutiny of the government's conduct. According to the plaintiffs, the government's refusal to produce witnesses or documents, combined with Blanche's acknowledgment that the FBI mishandled Epstein complaints, created precisely the extraordinary circumstances necessary to compel his testimony. They emphasized that Blanche was uniquely positioned to explain why he concluded that the FBI failed to investigate Epstein properly and whether those failures violated mandatory investigative obligations rather than discretionary decisions. The survivors also argued that allowing the government to prevent Blanche's deposition would further undermine accountability for the institutional failures that permitted Epstein's abuse to continue. Their attorneys ultimately asked the court to deny the government's motion to quash the subpoena, reject its request for a protective order, and compel Blanche to testify under oath within 14 days. The filing did not establish that the government had violated the law or that Blanche would be forced to testify, but it placed his alleged admissions about the FBI's failures at the center of a significant legal confrontation between Epstein survivors and the Justice Department.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.flsd.693362.147.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76235904Mon, 09 Nov 2026 13:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciSurvivors of Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse filed a sharply worded opposition to the Justice Department's attempt to block Attorney General Todd Blanche from being deposed in their lawsuit against the federal government. In the November 3, 2026,...

The filing also directly challenged the Justice Department's reliance on the apex doctrine, which generally protects high-ranking government officials from being compelled to testify in civil proceedings. The survivors' attorneys argued that the doctrine was not an absolute prohibition and cited federal court decisions allowing depositions of senior officials when exceptional circumstances, unique personal knowledge, or evidence of government misconduct justified their testimony. They further alleged that the Justice Department's handling of Epstein records, including accusations that survivors' identities had been exposed while alleged abusers' names remained redacted, supported additional scrutiny of the government's conduct. According to the plaintiffs, the government's refusal to produce witnesses or documents, combined with Blanche's acknowledgment that the FBI mishandled Epstein complaints, created precisely the extraordinary circumstances necessary to compel his testimony. They emphasized that Blanche was uniquely positioned to explain why he concluded that the FBI failed to investigate Epstein properly and whether those failures violated mandatory investigative obligations rather than discretionary decisions. The survivors also argued that allowing the government to prevent Blanche's deposition would further undermine accountability for the institutional failures that permitted Epstein's abuse to continue. Their attorneys ultimately asked the court to deny the government's motion to quash the subpoena, reject its request for a protective order, and compel Blanche to testify under oath within 14 days. The filing did not establish that the government had violated the law or that Blanche would be forced to testify, but it placed his alleged admissions about the FBI's failures at the center of a significant legal confrontation between Epstein survivors and the Justice Department.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.flsd.693362.147.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: 838epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-hillary-clinton-and-her-epstein-related-talk-with-congress-part-9-11-11-9-26--76252911Hillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met Epstein, never flew on his plane, never visited Little St. James and knew nothing about his crimes before they became public. She described Maxwell as no more than a “casual acquaintance,” said she did not consider her a friend and attributed Maxwell’s presence around the Clinton family largely to her relationship with longtime Clinton friend Ted Waitt. Clinton acknowledged that Maxwell attended Chelsea Clinton’s 2010 wedding, but said she had no specific recollection of speaking with her there and believed Maxwell attended as Waitt’s guest. She also said she did not remember Maxwell visiting the Clintons’ Chappaqua home, despite Maxwell later saying she had been there several times, and said she had no knowledge of Epstein having connections to American or foreign intelligence services.

The questioning became much more contentious when lawmakers turned to Bill Clinton’s documented relationship with Epstein. Hillary characterized her husband’s relationship with Epstein as “limited” and primarily connected to his use of Epstein’s airplane, said she had no knowledge of Bill visiting Little St. James and maintained there was no evidence connecting him to Epstein’s crimes. When lawmakers pressed her about photographs showing Bill Clinton with Epstein, Maxwell and young women during trips, Clinton acknowledged seeing some of those photographs but said she had not become curious enough to investigate the circumstances herself, calling it simply “unfortunate” that her husband ever had dealings with Epstein. She also denied personally soliciting money from Epstein and said she was unaware of anyone doing so on her behalf, while acknowledging she knew little about whether Epstein played any role around Clinton Foundation or Clinton Global Initiative activities. The transcript therefore presented a consistent Clinton defense: she said she personally had essentially no relationship with Epstein and only a peripheral relationship with Maxwell, while repeatedly separating herself from questions about Bill Clinton by telling lawmakers that he would have to answer for his own conduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76252911Mon, 09 Nov 2026 11:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciHillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met...Hillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met Epstein, never flew on his plane, never visited Little St. James and knew nothing about his crimes before they became public. She described Maxwell as no more than a “casual acquaintance,” said she did not consider her a friend and attributed Maxwell’s presence around the Clinton family largely to her relationship with longtime Clinton friend Ted Waitt. Clinton acknowledged that Maxwell attended Chelsea Clinton’s 2010 wedding, but said she had no specific recollection of speaking with her there and believed Maxwell attended as Waitt’s guest. She also said she did not remember Maxwell visiting the Clintons’ Chappaqua home, despite Maxwell later saying she had been there several times, and said she had no knowledge of Epstein having connections to American or foreign intelligence services.

The questioning became much more contentious when lawmakers turned to Bill Clinton’s documented relationship with Epstein. Hillary characterized her husband’s relationship with Epstein as “limited” and primarily connected to his use of Epstein’s airplane, said she had no knowledge of Bill visiting Little St. James and maintained there was no evidence connecting him to Epstein’s crimes. When lawmakers pressed her about photographs showing Bill Clinton with Epstein, Maxwell and young women during trips, Clinton acknowledged seeing some of those photographs but said she had not become curious enough to investigate the circumstances herself, calling it simply “unfortunate” that her husband ever had dealings with Epstein. She also denied personally soliciting money from Epstein and said she was unaware of anyone doing so on her behalf, while acknowledging she knew little about whether Epstein played any role around Clinton Foundation or Clinton Global Initiative activities. The transcript therefore presented a consistent Clinton defense: she said she personally had essentially no relationship with Epstein and only a peripheral relationship with Maxwell, while repeatedly separating herself from questions about Bill Clinton by telling lawmakers that he would have to answer for his own conduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2506epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-hillary-clinton-and-her-epstein-related-talk-with-congress-part-5-8-11-9-26--76252910Hillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met Epstein, never flew on his plane, never visited Little St. James and knew nothing about his crimes before they became public. She described Maxwell as no more than a “casual acquaintance,” said she did not consider her a friend and attributed Maxwell’s presence around the Clinton family largely to her relationship with longtime Clinton friend Ted Waitt. Clinton acknowledged that Maxwell attended Chelsea Clinton’s 2010 wedding, but said she had no specific recollection of speaking with her there and believed Maxwell attended as Waitt’s guest. She also said she did not remember Maxwell visiting the Clintons’ Chappaqua home, despite Maxwell later saying she had been there several times, and said she had no knowledge of Epstein having connections to American or foreign intelligence services.

The questioning became much more contentious when lawmakers turned to Bill Clinton’s documented relationship with Epstein. Hillary characterized her husband’s relationship with Epstein as “limited” and primarily connected to his use of Epstein’s airplane, said she had no knowledge of Bill visiting Little St. James and maintained there was no evidence connecting him to Epstein’s crimes. When lawmakers pressed her about photographs showing Bill Clinton with Epstein, Maxwell and young women during trips, Clinton acknowledged seeing some of those photographs but said she had not become curious enough to investigate the circumstances herself, calling it simply “unfortunate” that her husband ever had dealings with Epstein. She also denied personally soliciting money from Epstein and said she was unaware of anyone doing so on her behalf, while acknowledging she knew little about whether Epstein played any role around Clinton Foundation or Clinton Global Initiative activities. The transcript therefore presented a consistent Clinton defense: she said she personally had essentially no relationship with Epstein and only a peripheral relationship with Maxwell, while repeatedly separating herself from questions about Bill Clinton by telling lawmakers that he would have to answer for his own conduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76252910Mon, 09 Nov 2026 09:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciHillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met...Hillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met Epstein, never flew on his plane, never visited Little St. James and knew nothing about his crimes before they became public. She described Maxwell as no more than a “casual acquaintance,” said she did not consider her a friend and attributed Maxwell’s presence around the Clinton family largely to her relationship with longtime Clinton friend Ted Waitt. Clinton acknowledged that Maxwell attended Chelsea Clinton’s 2010 wedding, but said she had no specific recollection of speaking with her there and believed Maxwell attended as Waitt’s guest. She also said she did not remember Maxwell visiting the Clintons’ Chappaqua home, despite Maxwell later saying she had been there several times, and said she had no knowledge of Epstein having connections to American or foreign intelligence services.

The questioning became much more contentious when lawmakers turned to Bill Clinton’s documented relationship with Epstein. Hillary characterized her husband’s relationship with Epstein as “limited” and primarily connected to his use of Epstein’s airplane, said she had no knowledge of Bill visiting Little St. James and maintained there was no evidence connecting him to Epstein’s crimes. When lawmakers pressed her about photographs showing Bill Clinton with Epstein, Maxwell and young women during trips, Clinton acknowledged seeing some of those photographs but said she had not become curious enough to investigate the circumstances herself, calling it simply “unfortunate” that her husband ever had dealings with Epstein. She also denied personally soliciting money from Epstein and said she was unaware of anyone doing so on her behalf, while acknowledging she knew little about whether Epstein played any role around Clinton Foundation or Clinton Global Initiative activities. The transcript therefore presented a consistent Clinton defense: she said she personally had essentially no relationship with Epstein and only a peripheral relationship with Maxwell, while repeatedly separating herself from questions about Bill Clinton by telling lawmakers that he would have to answer for his own conduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2914epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-hillary-clinton-and-her-epstein-related-talk-with-congress-part-1-4-11-8-26--76252909Hillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met Epstein, never flew on his plane, never visited Little St. James and knew nothing about his crimes before they became public. She described Maxwell as no more than a “casual acquaintance,” said she did not consider her a friend and attributed Maxwell’s presence around the Clinton family largely to her relationship with longtime Clinton friend Ted Waitt. Clinton acknowledged that Maxwell attended Chelsea Clinton’s 2010 wedding, but said she had no specific recollection of speaking with her there and believed Maxwell attended as Waitt’s guest. She also said she did not remember Maxwell visiting the Clintons’ Chappaqua home, despite Maxwell later saying she had been there several times, and said she had no knowledge of Epstein having connections to American or foreign intelligence services.

The questioning became much more contentious when lawmakers turned to Bill Clinton’s documented relationship with Epstein. Hillary characterized her husband’s relationship with Epstein as “limited” and primarily connected to his use of Epstein’s airplane, said she had no knowledge of Bill visiting Little St. James and maintained there was no evidence connecting him to Epstein’s crimes. When lawmakers pressed her about photographs showing Bill Clinton with Epstein, Maxwell and young women during trips, Clinton acknowledged seeing some of those photographs but said she had not become curious enough to investigate the circumstances herself, calling it simply “unfortunate” that her husband ever had dealings with Epstein. She also denied personally soliciting money from Epstein and said she was unaware of anyone doing so on her behalf, while acknowledging she knew little about whether Epstein played any role around Clinton Foundation or Clinton Global Initiative activities. The transcript therefore presented a consistent Clinton defense: she said she personally had essentially no relationship with Epstein and only a peripheral relationship with Maxwell, while repeatedly separating herself from questions about Bill Clinton by telling lawmakers that he would have to answer for his own conduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76252909Mon, 09 Nov 2026 07:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciHillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met...Hillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met Epstein, never flew on his plane, never visited Little St. James and knew nothing about his crimes before they became public. She described Maxwell as no more than a “casual acquaintance,” said she did not consider her a friend and attributed Maxwell’s presence around the Clinton family largely to her relationship with longtime Clinton friend Ted Waitt. Clinton acknowledged that Maxwell attended Chelsea Clinton’s 2010 wedding, but said she had no specific recollection of speaking with her there and believed Maxwell attended as Waitt’s guest. She also said she did not remember Maxwell visiting the Clintons’ Chappaqua home, despite Maxwell later saying she had been there several times, and said she had no knowledge of Epstein having connections to American or foreign intelligence services.

The questioning became much more contentious when lawmakers turned to Bill Clinton’s documented relationship with Epstein. Hillary characterized her husband’s relationship with Epstein as “limited” and primarily connected to his use of Epstein’s airplane, said she had no knowledge of Bill visiting Little St. James and maintained there was no evidence connecting him to Epstein’s crimes. When lawmakers pressed her about photographs showing Bill Clinton with Epstein, Maxwell and young women during trips, Clinton acknowledged seeing some of those photographs but said she had not become curious enough to investigate the circumstances herself, calling it simply “unfortunate” that her husband ever had dealings with Epstein. She also denied personally soliciting money from Epstein and said she was unaware of anyone doing so on her behalf, while acknowledging she knew little about whether Epstein played any role around Clinton Foundation or Clinton Global Initiative activities. The transcript therefore presented a consistent Clinton defense: she said she personally had essentially no relationship with Epstein and only a peripheral relationship with Maxwell, while repeatedly separating herself from questions about Bill Clinton by telling lawmakers that he would have to answer for his own conduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2934epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/epstein-s-role-as-the-civilian-broker-between-mossad-cia-and-american-billionaires-part-2--76244245

Behind the procedural delays and partisan noise in Washington lies the same motive that shielded Epstein in life: protection of the powerful. The stalled congressional vote to release the full, unredacted “Epstein files” reflects bipartisan fear of what the documents might confirm—that the scandal wasn’t an anomaly but a glimpse of how the modern intelligence economy actually works. Epstein’s homes, jets, and investments formed a web where blackmail, espionage, and profit overlapped. Whether he acted as asset or opportunist remains unproven, but the surviving records make clear that his network touched the highest levels of state and corporate power. What’s at stake in the fight over those files isn’t gossip—it’s the map of a system built to ensure that truth itself remains classified.



to  contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com  

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76244245Mon, 09 Nov 2026 05:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJeffrey Epstein’s saga was never just the story of a sex-trafficking billionaire; it was the story of how power, intelligence, and money fuse into a single machine of influence. Documents released by the House Oversight Committee and reporting from...

Behind the procedural delays and partisan noise in Washington lies the same motive that shielded Epstein in life: protection of the powerful. The stalled congressional vote to release the full, unredacted “Epstein files” reflects bipartisan fear of what the documents might confirm—that the scandal wasn’t an anomaly but a glimpse of how the modern intelligence economy actually works. Epstein’s homes, jets, and investments formed a web where blackmail, espionage, and profit overlapped. Whether he acted as asset or opportunist remains unproven, but the surviving records make clear that his network touched the highest levels of state and corporate power. What’s at stake in the fight over those files isn’t gossip—it’s the map of a system built to ensure that truth itself remains classified.



to  contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com  

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>957epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/epstein-s-role-as-the-civilian-broker-between-mossad-cia-and-american-billionaires-part-1--76244244

Behind the procedural delays and partisan noise in Washington lies the same motive that shielded Epstein in life: protection of the powerful. The stalled congressional vote to release the full, unredacted “Epstein files” reflects bipartisan fear of what the documents might confirm—that the scandal wasn’t an anomaly but a glimpse of how the modern intelligence economy actually works. Epstein’s homes, jets, and investments formed a web where blackmail, espionage, and profit overlapped. Whether he acted as asset or opportunist remains unproven, but the surviving records make clear that his network touched the highest levels of state and corporate power. What’s at stake in the fight over those files isn’t gossip—it’s the map of a system built to ensure that truth itself remains classified.



to  contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com  

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76244244Mon, 09 Nov 2026 03:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJeffrey Epstein’s saga was never just the story of a sex-trafficking billionaire; it was the story of how power, intelligence, and money fuse into a single machine of influence. Documents released by the House Oversight Committee and reporting from...

Behind the procedural delays and partisan noise in Washington lies the same motive that shielded Epstein in life: protection of the powerful. The stalled congressional vote to release the full, unredacted “Epstein files” reflects bipartisan fear of what the documents might confirm—that the scandal wasn’t an anomaly but a glimpse of how the modern intelligence economy actually works. Epstein’s homes, jets, and investments formed a web where blackmail, espionage, and profit overlapped. Whether he acted as asset or opportunist remains unproven, but the surviving records make clear that his network touched the highest levels of state and corporate power. What’s at stake in the fight over those files isn’t gossip—it’s the map of a system built to ensure that truth itself remains classified.



to  contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com  

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>821epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/democrats-prepare-to-investigate-jpmorgan-s-financial-relationship-with-jeffrey-epstein-11-8-26--76235905
JPMorgan's relationship with Epstein has already produced substantial legal and financial consequences, including a $290 million settlement with survivors and a separate $75 million settlement with the U.S. Virgin Islands in 2023, both reached without admissions of wrongdoing. During the Virgin Islands litigation, government attorneys accused the bank of facilitating Epstein's trafficking enterprise by processing enormous sums of money while failing to adequately respond to suspicious financial activity. Attorney Mimi Liu argued that JPMorgan had effectively operated as a financial services provider for Epstein's trafficking operation and criticized the institution for filing extensive suspicious activity reports only after his death in 2019. Wyden's investigators have separately identified significant discrepancies in the bank's reporting, including approximately $1.3 billion in transactions flagged after Epstein's death, compared with a much smaller amount reported during the years when he was operating. JPMorgan has maintained that it did not knowingly facilitate Epstein's crimes, arguing that federal authorities possessed information about his activities that was never shared with the bank. The institution has also placed considerable responsibility on former executive Jes Staley, who has denied knowing about Epstein's criminal conduct. With Democrats preparing to assume congressional leadership in January, investigators could pursue internal communications, compliance records, financial transactions, and sworn testimony concerning what JPMorgan executives knew and when they knew it. The proposed investigation has not yet produced new findings, but it threatens to reopen serious questions about the financial infrastructure that allowed Epstein to move enormous sums of money while continuing his abuse, and whether the banking executives responsible for maintaining those relationships have ever been adequately held accountable.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Dems could grill JPMorgan on Jeffrey Epstein ties once they take control of Congress: report

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76235905Mon, 09 Nov 2026 01:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDemocrats are reportedly preparing to launch a major congressional investigation into JPMorgan Chase's longstanding financial relationship with Jeffrey Epstein after winning control of both chambers of Congress in the 2026 midterm elections. According...
JPMorgan's relationship with Epstein has already produced substantial legal and financial consequences, including a $290 million settlement with survivors and a separate $75 million settlement with the U.S. Virgin Islands in 2023, both reached without admissions of wrongdoing. During the Virgin Islands litigation, government attorneys accused the bank of facilitating Epstein's trafficking enterprise by processing enormous sums of money while failing to adequately respond to suspicious financial activity. Attorney Mimi Liu argued that JPMorgan had effectively operated as a financial services provider for Epstein's trafficking operation and criticized the institution for filing extensive suspicious activity reports only after his death in 2019. Wyden's investigators have separately identified significant discrepancies in the bank's reporting, including approximately $1.3 billion in transactions flagged after Epstein's death, compared with a much smaller amount reported during the years when he was operating. JPMorgan has maintained that it did not knowingly facilitate Epstein's crimes, arguing that federal authorities possessed information about his activities that was never shared with the bank. The institution has also placed considerable responsibility on former executive Jes Staley, who has denied knowing about Epstein's criminal conduct. With Democrats preparing to assume congressional leadership in January, investigators could pursue internal communications, compliance records, financial transactions, and sworn testimony concerning what JPMorgan executives knew and when they knew it. The proposed investigation has not yet produced new findings, but it threatens to reopen serious questions about the financial infrastructure that allowed Epstein to move enormous sums of money while continuing his abuse, and whether the banking executives responsible for maintaining those relationships have ever been adequately held accountable.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

875epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/todd-blanche-avoids-deposition-as-federal-judge-sides-with-doj-in-epstein-survivors-lawsuit-11-8-26--76235903The Trump administration secured a significant legal victory in its ongoing battle with Jeffrey Epstein survivors after a federal magistrate judge granted a protective order preventing Attorney General Todd Blanche from being compelled to testify under oath in their lawsuit against the federal government. In a November 5, 2026, ruling, U.S. Magistrate Judge Ryon McCabe sided with the Justice Department's argument that Blanche was protected by the apex doctrine, which generally shields high-ranking government officials from depositions unless extraordinary circumstances justify compelling their testimony. The survivors had subpoenaed Blanche following a July meeting during which he allegedly acknowledged that the FBI had failed to properly investigate Epstein, telling victims that they had been failed by the bureau but that he could not correct its lack of investigation. Their attorneys argued that these statements gave Blanche unique knowledge about the government's historical failures and made his testimony essential to determining whether federal agents violated mandatory investigative policies. McCabe disagreed, concluding that the survivors had not exhausted alternative methods of obtaining the information, including written discovery and testimony from designated government witnesses. The judge also determined that the survivors' demand for all documents concerning Jeffrey Epstein exceeded the narrow discovery previously authorized by U.S. District Judge David Leibowitz, which was restricted to FBI policies governing child sexual abuse complaints and whether the plaintiffs had exhausted their administrative remedies. Although McCabe explained that his Florida court lacked jurisdiction to formally quash a subpoena requiring compliance in New York, the protective order effectively prevented Blanche's deposition and delivered the administration the result it sought.

However, the ruling was not a complete victory for the Justice Department, because McCabe also determined that Blanche's alleged statements to Epstein survivors warranted further examination. The judge authorized the plaintiffs to submit up to ten written interrogatories directly to Blanche in his official capacity, specifically addressing comments he allegedly made during the July 16 meeting about the FBI's mishandling of Epstein's case before 2007. Blanche must respond within 15 days of receiving those questions, creating a limited avenue for survivors to obtain answers from the attorney general despite the government's successful effort to prevent an in-person deposition. McCabe also ordered the Justice Department to begin producing documents once a confidentiality agreement is established, respond to outstanding discovery requests, and coordinate the deposition of a designated government witness. The parties were instructed to resolve the confidentiality arrangement and schedule that deposition by November 11. Importantly, the judge left open the possibility that survivors could renew their request to depose Blanche after exhausting other discovery methods, provided they demonstrate the extraordinary circumstances required to overcome the apex doctrine. The decision therefore temporarily shields Blanche from questioning under oath while preserving a narrower path for investigating his alleged acknowledgment of the FBI's failures. For survivors who have spent years challenging the government's handling of Epstein, the ruling represents another significant obstacle in their effort to obtain direct testimony.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Trump admin dodges deposition for Todd Blanche over Epstein

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76235903Sun, 08 Nov 2026 23:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe Trump administration secured a significant legal victory in its ongoing battle with Jeffrey Epstein survivors after a federal magistrate judge granted a protective order preventing Attorney General Todd Blanche from being compelled to testify...The Trump administration secured a significant legal victory in its ongoing battle with Jeffrey Epstein survivors after a federal magistrate judge granted a protective order preventing Attorney General Todd Blanche from being compelled to testify under oath in their lawsuit against the federal government. In a November 5, 2026, ruling, U.S. Magistrate Judge Ryon McCabe sided with the Justice Department's argument that Blanche was protected by the apex doctrine, which generally shields high-ranking government officials from depositions unless extraordinary circumstances justify compelling their testimony. The survivors had subpoenaed Blanche following a July meeting during which he allegedly acknowledged that the FBI had failed to properly investigate Epstein, telling victims that they had been failed by the bureau but that he could not correct its lack of investigation. Their attorneys argued that these statements gave Blanche unique knowledge about the government's historical failures and made his testimony essential to determining whether federal agents violated mandatory investigative policies. McCabe disagreed, concluding that the survivors had not exhausted alternative methods of obtaining the information, including written discovery and testimony from designated government witnesses. The judge also determined that the survivors' demand for all documents concerning Jeffrey Epstein exceeded the narrow discovery previously authorized by U.S. District Judge David Leibowitz, which was restricted to FBI policies governing child sexual abuse complaints and whether the plaintiffs had exhausted their administrative remedies. Although McCabe explained that his Florida court lacked jurisdiction to formally quash a subpoena requiring compliance in New York, the protective order effectively prevented Blanche's deposition and delivered the administration the result it sought.

However, the ruling was not a complete victory for the Justice Department, because McCabe also determined that Blanche's alleged statements to Epstein survivors warranted further examination. The judge authorized the plaintiffs to submit up to ten written interrogatories directly to Blanche in his official capacity, specifically addressing comments he allegedly made during the July 16 meeting about the FBI's mishandling of Epstein's case before 2007. Blanche must respond within 15 days of receiving those questions, creating a limited avenue for survivors to obtain answers from the attorney general despite the government's successful effort to prevent an in-person deposition. McCabe also ordered the Justice Department to begin producing documents once a confidentiality agreement is established, respond to outstanding discovery requests, and coordinate the deposition of a designated government witness. The parties were instructed to resolve the confidentiality arrangement and schedule that deposition by November 11. Importantly, the judge left open the possibility that survivors could renew their request to depose Blanche after exhausting other discovery methods, provided they demonstrate the extraordinary circumstances required to overcome the apex doctrine. The decision therefore temporarily shields Blanche from questioning under oath while preserving a narrower path for investigating his alleged acknowledgment of the FBI's failures. For survivors who have spent years challenging the government's handling of Epstein, the ruling represents another significant obstacle in their effort to obtain direct testimony.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Trump admin dodges deposition for Todd Blanche over Epstein747epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/former-prince-andrew-faces-questions-over-750-000-payment-from-turkish-businesswoman-11-8-26--76235902
The prospect of Andrew being questioned under oath represents another extraordinary humiliation for the disgraced former royal, whose financial dealings and associations have generated years of controversy. Unlike his carefully managed public appearances, courtroom testimony would expose Andrew to questioning by attorneys about the circumstances surrounding the payments, his interactions with Turk, and what he understood about the source and purpose of the money. Royal biographer Andrew Lownie described the development as potentially devastating for the monarchy, arguing that even if Andrew received the money in exchange for using his influence in Turkey, such an arrangement would raise serious questions about his responsibilities as a member of the royal family. The summons also arrives against the backdrop of Andrew's continuing legal problems stemming from his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, including a separate Thames Valley Police investigation into allegations of misconduct in public office, which Andrew denies. His appearance would mark his first substantial public questioning since his disastrous 2019 BBC interview, during which his explanations concerning Epstein and Virginia Giuffre intensified scrutiny of his conduct and ultimately contributed to his removal from public royal duties. Although Andrew could still seek to have the summons set aside, the possibility of compelled testimony creates a situation in which the former prince may have to explain his financial arrangements in a public courtroom rather than through carefully worded statements from his representatives. For a man whose response to years of controversy has frequently involved retreating from public scrutiny, the prospect of facing lawyers under oath represents a significant departure from the protection and discretion he once enjoyed.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76235902Sun, 08 Nov 2026 21:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciAndrew Mountbatten-Windsor, formerly Prince Andrew, has been served with a witness summons requiring him to give evidence in a British High Court civil fraud trial involving suspicious financial transactions connected to his former luxury ski chalet...
The prospect of Andrew being questioned under oath represents another extraordinary humiliation for the disgraced former royal, whose financial dealings and associations have generated years of controversy. Unlike his carefully managed public appearances, courtroom testimony would expose Andrew to questioning by attorneys about the circumstances surrounding the payments, his interactions with Turk, and what he understood about the source and purpose of the money. Royal biographer Andrew Lownie described the development as potentially devastating for the monarchy, arguing that even if Andrew received the money in exchange for using his influence in Turkey, such an arrangement would raise serious questions about his responsibilities as a member of the royal family. The summons also arrives against the backdrop of Andrew's continuing legal problems stemming from his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, including a separate Thames Valley Police investigation into allegations of misconduct in public office, which Andrew denies. His appearance would mark his first substantial public questioning since his disastrous 2019 BBC interview, during which his explanations concerning Epstein and Virginia Giuffre intensified scrutiny of his conduct and ultimately contributed to his removal from public royal duties. Although Andrew could still seek to have the summons set aside, the possibility of compelled testimony creates a situation in which the former prince may have to explain his financial arrangements in a public courtroom rather than through carefully worded statements from his representatives. For a man whose response to years of controversy has frequently involved retreating from public scrutiny, the prospect of facing lawyers under oath represents a significant departure from the protection and discretion he once enjoyed.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>995epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/epstein-survivors-and-their-memorandum-seeking-to-amend-lawsuit-against-usvi-officials-part-2-11-8-26--76235966
The survivors asked the federal court in Manhattan to allow a second amended complaint that would address deficiencies identified in four motions to dismiss while introducing additional allegations under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, commonly known as RICO. Their attorneys argued that the amendment was justified because the lawsuit remained in its early stages, discovery had not begun, and permitting the revised allegations would not unfairly prejudice the defendants. Alternatively, they requested limited discovery focused on establishing personal jurisdiction and proper venue in New York, including records showing whether the defendants conducted business with Epstein or his companies, visited him in New York to obtain financial support, or maintained property interests in the state. The plaintiffs emphasized that much of this information was exclusively controlled by the defendants or remained inaccessible because of confidentiality protections imposed during the JPMorgan litigation. They also explained that they had sought permission to intervene in the earlier Virgin Islands lawsuit to obtain access to protected evidence under the same confidentiality restrictions. Their central argument was that survivors should not be prevented from pursuing accountability simply because documents potentially establishing the defendants' involvement were unavailable to them. The filing asked the judge to permit the amended complaint or authorize targeted discovery rather than dismiss the case before the plaintiffs could obtain potentially relevant evidence. These were allegations and legal arguments advanced by the survivors, not judicial findings that the named officials had participated in Epstein's crimes.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.94.1.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76235966Sun, 08 Nov 2026 19:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciAttorneys representing six Jane Doe plaintiffs in a lawsuit against the United States Virgin Islands government and several former and current territorial officials filed a memorandum on May 8, 2024, seeking permission to amend their complaint and...
The survivors asked the federal court in Manhattan to allow a second amended complaint that would address deficiencies identified in four motions to dismiss while introducing additional allegations under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, commonly known as RICO. Their attorneys argued that the amendment was justified because the lawsuit remained in its early stages, discovery had not begun, and permitting the revised allegations would not unfairly prejudice the defendants. Alternatively, they requested limited discovery focused on establishing personal jurisdiction and proper venue in New York, including records showing whether the defendants conducted business with Epstein or his companies, visited him in New York to obtain financial support, or maintained property interests in the state. The plaintiffs emphasized that much of this information was exclusively controlled by the defendants or remained inaccessible because of confidentiality protections imposed during the JPMorgan litigation. They also explained that they had sought permission to intervene in the earlier Virgin Islands lawsuit to obtain access to protected evidence under the same confidentiality restrictions. Their central argument was that survivors should not be prevented from pursuing accountability simply because documents potentially establishing the defendants' involvement were unavailable to them. The filing asked the judge to permit the amended complaint or authorize targeted discovery rather than dismiss the case before the plaintiffs could obtain potentially relevant evidence. These were allegations and legal arguments advanced by the survivors, not judicial findings that the named officials had participated in Epstein's crimes.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.94.1.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: 884epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/epstein-survivors-and-their-memorandum-seeking-to-amend-lawsuit-against-usvi-officials-part-1-11-8-26--76235967
The survivors asked the federal court in Manhattan to allow a second amended complaint that would address deficiencies identified in four motions to dismiss while introducing additional allegations under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, commonly known as RICO. Their attorneys argued that the amendment was justified because the lawsuit remained in its early stages, discovery had not begun, and permitting the revised allegations would not unfairly prejudice the defendants. Alternatively, they requested limited discovery focused on establishing personal jurisdiction and proper venue in New York, including records showing whether the defendants conducted business with Epstein or his companies, visited him in New York to obtain financial support, or maintained property interests in the state. The plaintiffs emphasized that much of this information was exclusively controlled by the defendants or remained inaccessible because of confidentiality protections imposed during the JPMorgan litigation. They also explained that they had sought permission to intervene in the earlier Virgin Islands lawsuit to obtain access to protected evidence under the same confidentiality restrictions. Their central argument was that survivors should not be prevented from pursuing accountability simply because documents potentially establishing the defendants' involvement were unavailable to them. The filing asked the judge to permit the amended complaint or authorize targeted discovery rather than dismiss the case before the plaintiffs could obtain potentially relevant evidence. These were allegations and legal arguments advanced by the survivors, not judicial findings that the named officials had participated in Epstein's crimes.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.94.1.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76235967Sun, 08 Nov 2026 17:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciAttorneys representing six Jane Doe plaintiffs in a lawsuit against the United States Virgin Islands government and several former and current territorial officials filed a memorandum on May 8, 2024, seeking permission to amend their complaint and...
The survivors asked the federal court in Manhattan to allow a second amended complaint that would address deficiencies identified in four motions to dismiss while introducing additional allegations under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, commonly known as RICO. Their attorneys argued that the amendment was justified because the lawsuit remained in its early stages, discovery had not begun, and permitting the revised allegations would not unfairly prejudice the defendants. Alternatively, they requested limited discovery focused on establishing personal jurisdiction and proper venue in New York, including records showing whether the defendants conducted business with Epstein or his companies, visited him in New York to obtain financial support, or maintained property interests in the state. The plaintiffs emphasized that much of this information was exclusively controlled by the defendants or remained inaccessible because of confidentiality protections imposed during the JPMorgan litigation. They also explained that they had sought permission to intervene in the earlier Virgin Islands lawsuit to obtain access to protected evidence under the same confidentiality restrictions. Their central argument was that survivors should not be prevented from pursuing accountability simply because documents potentially establishing the defendants' involvement were unavailable to them. The filing asked the judge to permit the amended complaint or authorize targeted discovery rather than dismiss the case before the plaintiffs could obtain potentially relevant evidence. These were allegations and legal arguments advanced by the survivors, not judicial findings that the named officials had participated in Epstein's crimes.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.94.1.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: 637epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-kathy-ruemmler-and-her-epstein-related-transcript-from-her-trip-to-congress-part-15-18-11-8-26--76232430
The most damaging portion of Ruemmler’s testimony concerned Virginia Giuffre. Ruemmler said some of Giuffre’s allegations “lacked inherent credibility” and was questioned about a 2015 email in which she discussed whether counterclaims could be brought against Giuffre while Giuffre was suing Ghislaine Maxwell. Ruemmler claimed she did not remember the message and suggested she may merely have been responding conversationally to Epstein rather than actively developing a legal strategy against Giuffre. She said she had no reason to doubt that Giuffre had been abused, yet stopped short of affirming that Epstein and Maxwell had victimized her. Taken together, the testimony showed Ruemmler attempting to minimize her role and distance herself from Epstein while struggling to explain why she maintained such a close relationship with him and appeared willing to question one of his most prominent accusers.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Ruemmler-Final-Transcript_Redact-7.28.26.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76232430Sun, 08 Nov 2026 15:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciKathy Ruemmler told congressional investigators that she regretted associating with Jeffrey Epstein but maintained that she did not know he was continuing to abuse girls and young women after his 2008 conviction. The former Obama White House counsel...
The most damaging portion of Ruemmler’s testimony concerned Virginia Giuffre. Ruemmler said some of Giuffre’s allegations “lacked inherent credibility” and was questioned about a 2015 email in which she discussed whether counterclaims could be brought against Giuffre while Giuffre was suing Ghislaine Maxwell. Ruemmler claimed she did not remember the message and suggested she may merely have been responding conversationally to Epstein rather than actively developing a legal strategy against Giuffre. She said she had no reason to doubt that Giuffre had been abused, yet stopped short of affirming that Epstein and Maxwell had victimized her. Taken together, the testimony showed Ruemmler attempting to minimize her role and distance herself from Epstein while struggling to explain why she maintained such a close relationship with him and appeared willing to question one of his most prominent accusers.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Ruemmler-Final-Transcript_Redact-7.28.26.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3398epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-kathy-ruemmler-and-her-epstein-related-transcript-from-her-trip-to-congress-part-12-14-11-8-26--76232432
The most damaging portion of Ruemmler’s testimony concerned Virginia Giuffre. Ruemmler said some of Giuffre’s allegations “lacked inherent credibility” and was questioned about a 2015 email in which she discussed whether counterclaims could be brought against Giuffre while Giuffre was suing Ghislaine Maxwell. Ruemmler claimed she did not remember the message and suggested she may merely have been responding conversationally to Epstein rather than actively developing a legal strategy against Giuffre. She said she had no reason to doubt that Giuffre had been abused, yet stopped short of affirming that Epstein and Maxwell had victimized her. Taken together, the testimony showed Ruemmler attempting to minimize her role and distance herself from Epstein while struggling to explain why she maintained such a close relationship with him and appeared willing to question one of his most prominent accusers.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Ruemmler-Final-Transcript_Redact-7.28.26.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76232432Sun, 08 Nov 2026 13:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciKathy Ruemmler told congressional investigators that she regretted associating with Jeffrey Epstein but maintained that she did not know he was continuing to abuse girls and young women after his 2008 conviction. The former Obama White House counsel...
The most damaging portion of Ruemmler’s testimony concerned Virginia Giuffre. Ruemmler said some of Giuffre’s allegations “lacked inherent credibility” and was questioned about a 2015 email in which she discussed whether counterclaims could be brought against Giuffre while Giuffre was suing Ghislaine Maxwell. Ruemmler claimed she did not remember the message and suggested she may merely have been responding conversationally to Epstein rather than actively developing a legal strategy against Giuffre. She said she had no reason to doubt that Giuffre had been abused, yet stopped short of affirming that Epstein and Maxwell had victimized her. Taken together, the testimony showed Ruemmler attempting to minimize her role and distance herself from Epstein while struggling to explain why she maintained such a close relationship with him and appeared willing to question one of his most prominent accusers.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Ruemmler-Final-Transcript_Redact-7.28.26.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2690epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-kathy-ruemmler-and-her-epstein-related-transcript-from-her-trip-to-congress-part-8-11-11-8-26--76232428
The most damaging portion of Ruemmler’s testimony concerned Virginia Giuffre. Ruemmler said some of Giuffre’s allegations “lacked inherent credibility” and was questioned about a 2015 email in which she discussed whether counterclaims could be brought against Giuffre while Giuffre was suing Ghislaine Maxwell. Ruemmler claimed she did not remember the message and suggested she may merely have been responding conversationally to Epstein rather than actively developing a legal strategy against Giuffre. She said she had no reason to doubt that Giuffre had been abused, yet stopped short of affirming that Epstein and Maxwell had victimized her. Taken together, the testimony showed Ruemmler attempting to minimize her role and distance herself from Epstein while struggling to explain why she maintained such a close relationship with him and appeared willing to question one of his most prominent accusers.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Ruemmler-Final-Transcript_Redact-7.28.26.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76232428Sun, 08 Nov 2026 11:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciKathy Ruemmler told congressional investigators that she regretted associating with Jeffrey Epstein but maintained that she did not know he was continuing to abuse girls and young women after his 2008 conviction. The former Obama White House counsel...
The most damaging portion of Ruemmler’s testimony concerned Virginia Giuffre. Ruemmler said some of Giuffre’s allegations “lacked inherent credibility” and was questioned about a 2015 email in which she discussed whether counterclaims could be brought against Giuffre while Giuffre was suing Ghislaine Maxwell. Ruemmler claimed she did not remember the message and suggested she may merely have been responding conversationally to Epstein rather than actively developing a legal strategy against Giuffre. She said she had no reason to doubt that Giuffre had been abused, yet stopped short of affirming that Epstein and Maxwell had victimized her. Taken together, the testimony showed Ruemmler attempting to minimize her role and distance herself from Epstein while struggling to explain why she maintained such a close relationship with him and appeared willing to question one of his most prominent accusers.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Ruemmler-Final-Transcript_Redact-7.28.26.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3173epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-kathy-ruemmler-and-her-epstein-related-transcript-from-her-trip-to-congress-part-4-7-11-8-26--76232431
The most damaging portion of Ruemmler’s testimony concerned Virginia Giuffre. Ruemmler said some of Giuffre’s allegations “lacked inherent credibility” and was questioned about a 2015 email in which she discussed whether counterclaims could be brought against Giuffre while Giuffre was suing Ghislaine Maxwell. Ruemmler claimed she did not remember the message and suggested she may merely have been responding conversationally to Epstein rather than actively developing a legal strategy against Giuffre. She said she had no reason to doubt that Giuffre had been abused, yet stopped short of affirming that Epstein and Maxwell had victimized her. Taken together, the testimony showed Ruemmler attempting to minimize her role and distance herself from Epstein while struggling to explain why she maintained such a close relationship with him and appeared willing to question one of his most prominent accusers.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Ruemmler-Final-Transcript_Redact-7.28.26.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76232431Sun, 08 Nov 2026 09:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciKathy Ruemmler told congressional investigators that she regretted associating with Jeffrey Epstein but maintained that she did not know he was continuing to abuse girls and young women after his 2008 conviction. The former Obama White House counsel...
The most damaging portion of Ruemmler’s testimony concerned Virginia Giuffre. Ruemmler said some of Giuffre’s allegations “lacked inherent credibility” and was questioned about a 2015 email in which she discussed whether counterclaims could be brought against Giuffre while Giuffre was suing Ghislaine Maxwell. Ruemmler claimed she did not remember the message and suggested she may merely have been responding conversationally to Epstein rather than actively developing a legal strategy against Giuffre. She said she had no reason to doubt that Giuffre had been abused, yet stopped short of affirming that Epstein and Maxwell had victimized her. Taken together, the testimony showed Ruemmler attempting to minimize her role and distance herself from Epstein while struggling to explain why she maintained such a close relationship with him and appeared willing to question one of his most prominent accusers.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Ruemmler-Final-Transcript_Redact-7.28.26.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3279epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-kathy-ruemmler-and-her-epstein-related-transcript-from-her-trip-to-congress-part-1-3-11-8-26--76232429
The most damaging portion of Ruemmler’s testimony concerned Virginia Giuffre. Ruemmler said some of Giuffre’s allegations “lacked inherent credibility” and was questioned about a 2015 email in which she discussed whether counterclaims could be brought against Giuffre while Giuffre was suing Ghislaine Maxwell. Ruemmler claimed she did not remember the message and suggested she may merely have been responding conversationally to Epstein rather than actively developing a legal strategy against Giuffre. She said she had no reason to doubt that Giuffre had been abused, yet stopped short of affirming that Epstein and Maxwell had victimized her. Taken together, the testimony showed Ruemmler attempting to minimize her role and distance herself from Epstein while struggling to explain why she maintained such a close relationship with him and appeared willing to question one of his most prominent accusers.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Ruemmler-Final-Transcript_Redact-7.28.26.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76232429Sun, 08 Nov 2026 07:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciKathy Ruemmler told congressional investigators that she regretted associating with Jeffrey Epstein but maintained that she did not know he was continuing to abuse girls and young women after his 2008 conviction. The former Obama White House counsel...
The most damaging portion of Ruemmler’s testimony concerned Virginia Giuffre. Ruemmler said some of Giuffre’s allegations “lacked inherent credibility” and was questioned about a 2015 email in which she discussed whether counterclaims could be brought against Giuffre while Giuffre was suing Ghislaine Maxwell. Ruemmler claimed she did not remember the message and suggested she may merely have been responding conversationally to Epstein rather than actively developing a legal strategy against Giuffre. She said she had no reason to doubt that Giuffre had been abused, yet stopped short of affirming that Epstein and Maxwell had victimized her. Taken together, the testimony showed Ruemmler attempting to minimize her role and distance herself from Epstein while struggling to explain why she maintained such a close relationship with him and appeared willing to question one of his most prominent accusers.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Ruemmler-Final-Transcript_Redact-7.28.26.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2451epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/pam-bondi-crashes-out-during-her-congressional-hearing--76235447

The session rapidly deteriorated into a combative spectacle, with Bondi lashing out at Democrats with personal insults and shouting matches instead of sober legal explanations, at one point dismissing inquiries as “ridiculous” and railing against members she characterized as partisan adversaries. She refused to explicitly answer fundamental questions about whether the Department of Justice would investigate Epstein co-conspirators or remedy its redaction failures, opting instead to attack critics and pivot to broader political narratives that had little to do with the substance of the oversight. Survivors in attendance were visibly frustrated, and none indicated confidence that the DOJ under Bondi would support their pursuit of justice, underscoring the deepening controversy and a perception among many lawmakers that the attorney general’s performance was not just defensive but unmoored from the scrutiny she faced.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76235447Sun, 08 Nov 2026 05:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciYesterday’s Pam Bondi congressional hearing before the House Judiciary Committee utterly derailed into chaos as lawmakers — Republicans and Democrats alike — pressed her relentlessly over the Justice Department’s handling of the explosive Jeffrey...

The session rapidly deteriorated into a combative spectacle, with Bondi lashing out at Democrats with personal insults and shouting matches instead of sober legal explanations, at one point dismissing inquiries as “ridiculous” and railing against members she characterized as partisan adversaries. She refused to explicitly answer fundamental questions about whether the Department of Justice would investigate Epstein co-conspirators or remedy its redaction failures, opting instead to attack critics and pivot to broader political narratives that had little to do with the substance of the oversight. Survivors in attendance were visibly frustrated, and none indicated confidence that the DOJ under Bondi would support their pursuit of justice, underscoring the deepening controversy and a perception among many lawmakers that the attorney general’s performance was not just defensive but unmoored from the scrutiny she faced.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1216epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/kash-patel-s-transparency-claims-get-smacked-with-a-community-note-on-x--76235446
Patel's broader handling of the Epstein matter has drawn scrutiny from lawmakers, who pressed him on whether all relevant records have been reviewed or disclosed. In recent hearings, he declined to answer some questions — including how often former President Trump appears in the files — and defended the FBI’s disclosures by saying they had released all "legally allowed" material.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76235446Sun, 08 Nov 2026 03:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciFBI Director Kash Patel recently claimed on X that his agency has delivered on promises of "transparency," but the post was flagged with a Community Note adding context and pushback. The note reminded viewers that many documents tied to sex offender...
Patel's broader handling of the Epstein matter has drawn scrutiny from lawmakers, who pressed him on whether all relevant records have been reviewed or disclosed. In recent hearings, he declined to answer some questions — including how often former President Trump appears in the files — and defended the FBI’s disclosures by saying they had released all "legally allowed" material.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>797epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-s-attorneys-seek-camera-ban-following-trump-s-public-statements-11-7-26--76220672
The renewed request comes amid a contentious dispute over when Robinson should stand trial for the September 10, 2025, killing of Kirk during a Turning Point USA event at Utah Valley University in Orem. Prosecutors have proposed January 31, 2028, as a potential trial date while indicating they could be prepared as early as October 2027, whereas Robinson's attorneys have suggested a tentative date in late 2029. The defense has emphasized the complexity of the prosecution and the preparation necessary to protect Robinson's legal rights, while Trump's public criticism has added political attention to an already highly publicized case. Robinson's lawyers also argued that the November 9 scheduling hearing would involve no witness testimony or presentation of evidence, making cameras unnecessary for public understanding of the proceedings. They stressed that excluding electronic media would not prevent journalists or members of the public from attending the hearing, and that any resulting scheduling order would remain publicly accessible. Additionally, the defense challenged the court's procedures for deciding whether cameras should be permitted, arguing that witnesses were not being given adequate opportunities to raise privacy or security concerns. Judge Graf is expected to address trial scheduling at the November 9 hearing, while the dispute over cameras highlights the tension between public access to high-profile criminal proceedings and the defendant's right to an impartial jury. Robinson has pleaded not guilty to the charges against him, including aggravated murder, and could face the death penalty if convicted.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Tyler Robinson lawyers cite Trump post to block cameras at hearing | Fox News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76220672Sat, 07 Nov 2026 23:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciAttorneys representing Tyler Robinson, the 23-year-old accused of assassinating conservative activist Charlie Kirk, have renewed their effort to prohibit television cameras and still photography during an upcoming Utah court hearing, arguing that...
The renewed request comes amid a contentious dispute over when Robinson should stand trial for the September 10, 2025, killing of Kirk during a Turning Point USA event at Utah Valley University in Orem. Prosecutors have proposed January 31, 2028, as a potential trial date while indicating they could be prepared as early as October 2027, whereas Robinson's attorneys have suggested a tentative date in late 2029. The defense has emphasized the complexity of the prosecution and the preparation necessary to protect Robinson's legal rights, while Trump's public criticism has added political attention to an already highly publicized case. Robinson's lawyers also argued that the November 9 scheduling hearing would involve no witness testimony or presentation of evidence, making cameras unnecessary for public understanding of the proceedings. They stressed that excluding electronic media would not prevent journalists or members of the public from attending the hearing, and that any resulting scheduling order would remain publicly accessible. Additionally, the defense challenged the court's procedures for deciding whether cameras should be permitted, arguing that witnesses were not being given adequate opportunities to raise privacy or security concerns. Judge Graf is expected to address trial scheduling at the November 9 hearing, while the dispute over cameras highlights the tension between public access to high-profile criminal proceedings and the defendant's right to an impartial jury. Robinson has pleaded not guilty to the charges against him, including aggravated murder, and could face the death penalty if convicted.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Tyler Robinson lawyers cite Trump post to block cameras at hearing | Fox News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>650epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/maria-farmer-sues-the-federal-government-over-its-handling-of-jeffrey-epstein-part-9-11-7-26--76220616
The complaint also detailed Farmer's unsuccessful attempts to obtain accountability from the government after decades of alleged intimidation, emotional trauma, and institutional indifference. Farmer accused Epstein and Maxwell of threatening her safety, destroying her career prospects, and forcing her to repeatedly relocate out of fear of retaliation. She also alleged that federal authorities misled victims about the status of their investigations, failed to enforce even the limited restrictions imposed by Epstein's Florida plea arrangement, and concealed information that could have exposed misconduct within the Justice Department. After requesting FBI records concerning her 1996 and 2006 complaints, Farmer was informed that her Freedom of Information Act request might not be completed until November 2027. She also contacted the DOJ's Inspector General in 2023, but the department subsequently closed her complaint without initiating an internal affairs investigation. Filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act, the lawsuit asserted negligence and negligent or intentional infliction of emotional distress, seeking monetary damages and other relief for the government's alleged failures. Farmer maintained that the FBI and DOJ had numerous opportunities to intervene against Epstein but repeatedly failed to fulfill their responsibilities, allowing his criminal activities to continue while victims suffered the consequences. The filing represented a direct attempt to hold the federal government financially and legally accountable for its historical handling of Epstein, with Farmer arguing that the catastrophe was not simply the result of investigative mistakes but a prolonged failure to enforce laws specifically designed to protect children from sexual exploitation. These were allegations presented in Farmer's complaint, not findings that the government had been held liable.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.281128.1.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76220616Sat, 07 Nov 2026 21:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciOn May 29, 2025, Jeffrey Epstein survivor Maria Farmer filed a 63-page federal lawsuit against the United States government, accusing the FBI, Department of Justice, and federal prosecutors of decades of negligence that allowed Epstein and Ghislaine...
The complaint also detailed Farmer's unsuccessful attempts to obtain accountability from the government after decades of alleged intimidation, emotional trauma, and institutional indifference. Farmer accused Epstein and Maxwell of threatening her safety, destroying her career prospects, and forcing her to repeatedly relocate out of fear of retaliation. She also alleged that federal authorities misled victims about the status of their investigations, failed to enforce even the limited restrictions imposed by Epstein's Florida plea arrangement, and concealed information that could have exposed misconduct within the Justice Department. After requesting FBI records concerning her 1996 and 2006 complaints, Farmer was informed that her Freedom of Information Act request might not be completed until November 2027. She also contacted the DOJ's Inspector General in 2023, but the department subsequently closed her complaint without initiating an internal affairs investigation. Filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act, the lawsuit asserted negligence and negligent or intentional infliction of emotional distress, seeking monetary damages and other relief for the government's alleged failures. Farmer maintained that the FBI and DOJ had numerous opportunities to intervene against Epstein but repeatedly failed to fulfill their responsibilities, allowing his criminal activities to continue while victims suffered the consequences. The filing represented a direct attempt to hold the federal government financially and legally accountable for its historical handling of Epstein, with Farmer arguing that the catastrophe was not simply the result of investigative mistakes but a prolonged failure to enforce laws specifically designed to protect children from sexual exploitation. These were allegations presented in Farmer's complaint, not findings that the government had been held liable.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.281128.1.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: 769epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/maria-farmer-sues-the-federal-government-over-its-handling-of-jeffrey-epstein-part-8-11-7-26--76220614
The complaint also detailed Farmer's unsuccessful attempts to obtain accountability from the government after decades of alleged intimidation, emotional trauma, and institutional indifference. Farmer accused Epstein and Maxwell of threatening her safety, destroying her career prospects, and forcing her to repeatedly relocate out of fear of retaliation. She also alleged that federal authorities misled victims about the status of their investigations, failed to enforce even the limited restrictions imposed by Epstein's Florida plea arrangement, and concealed information that could have exposed misconduct within the Justice Department. After requesting FBI records concerning her 1996 and 2006 complaints, Farmer was informed that her Freedom of Information Act request might not be completed until November 2027. She also contacted the DOJ's Inspector General in 2023, but the department subsequently closed her complaint without initiating an internal affairs investigation. Filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act, the lawsuit asserted negligence and negligent or intentional infliction of emotional distress, seeking monetary damages and other relief for the government's alleged failures. Farmer maintained that the FBI and DOJ had numerous opportunities to intervene against Epstein but repeatedly failed to fulfill their responsibilities, allowing his criminal activities to continue while victims suffered the consequences. The filing represented a direct attempt to hold the federal government financially and legally accountable for its historical handling of Epstein, with Farmer arguing that the catastrophe was not simply the result of investigative mistakes but a prolonged failure to enforce laws specifically designed to protect children from sexual exploitation. These were allegations presented in Farmer's complaint, not findings that the government had been held liable.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.281128.1.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76220614Sat, 07 Nov 2026 19:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciOn May 29, 2025, Jeffrey Epstein survivor Maria Farmer filed a 63-page federal lawsuit against the United States government, accusing the FBI, Department of Justice, and federal prosecutors of decades of negligence that allowed Epstein and Ghislaine...
The complaint also detailed Farmer's unsuccessful attempts to obtain accountability from the government after decades of alleged intimidation, emotional trauma, and institutional indifference. Farmer accused Epstein and Maxwell of threatening her safety, destroying her career prospects, and forcing her to repeatedly relocate out of fear of retaliation. She also alleged that federal authorities misled victims about the status of their investigations, failed to enforce even the limited restrictions imposed by Epstein's Florida plea arrangement, and concealed information that could have exposed misconduct within the Justice Department. After requesting FBI records concerning her 1996 and 2006 complaints, Farmer was informed that her Freedom of Information Act request might not be completed until November 2027. She also contacted the DOJ's Inspector General in 2023, but the department subsequently closed her complaint without initiating an internal affairs investigation. Filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act, the lawsuit asserted negligence and negligent or intentional infliction of emotional distress, seeking monetary damages and other relief for the government's alleged failures. Farmer maintained that the FBI and DOJ had numerous opportunities to intervene against Epstein but repeatedly failed to fulfill their responsibilities, allowing his criminal activities to continue while victims suffered the consequences. The filing represented a direct attempt to hold the federal government financially and legally accountable for its historical handling of Epstein, with Farmer arguing that the catastrophe was not simply the result of investigative mistakes but a prolonged failure to enforce laws specifically designed to protect children from sexual exploitation. These were allegations presented in Farmer's complaint, not findings that the government had been held liable.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.281128.1.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: 647epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/maria-farmer-sues-the-federal-government-over-its-handling-of-jeffrey-epstein-part-7-11-7-26--76220615
The complaint also detailed Farmer's unsuccessful attempts to obtain accountability from the government after decades of alleged intimidation, emotional trauma, and institutional indifference. Farmer accused Epstein and Maxwell of threatening her safety, destroying her career prospects, and forcing her to repeatedly relocate out of fear of retaliation. She also alleged that federal authorities misled victims about the status of their investigations, failed to enforce even the limited restrictions imposed by Epstein's Florida plea arrangement, and concealed information that could have exposed misconduct within the Justice Department. After requesting FBI records concerning her 1996 and 2006 complaints, Farmer was informed that her Freedom of Information Act request might not be completed until November 2027. She also contacted the DOJ's Inspector General in 2023, but the department subsequently closed her complaint without initiating an internal affairs investigation. Filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act, the lawsuit asserted negligence and negligent or intentional infliction of emotional distress, seeking monetary damages and other relief for the government's alleged failures. Farmer maintained that the FBI and DOJ had numerous opportunities to intervene against Epstein but repeatedly failed to fulfill their responsibilities, allowing his criminal activities to continue while victims suffered the consequences. The filing represented a direct attempt to hold the federal government financially and legally accountable for its historical handling of Epstein, with Farmer arguing that the catastrophe was not simply the result of investigative mistakes but a prolonged failure to enforce laws specifically designed to protect children from sexual exploitation. These were allegations presented in Farmer's complaint, not findings that the government had been held liable.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.281128.1.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76220615Sat, 07 Nov 2026 17:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciOn May 29, 2025, Jeffrey Epstein survivor Maria Farmer filed a 63-page federal lawsuit against the United States government, accusing the FBI, Department of Justice, and federal prosecutors of decades of negligence that allowed Epstein and Ghislaine...
The complaint also detailed Farmer's unsuccessful attempts to obtain accountability from the government after decades of alleged intimidation, emotional trauma, and institutional indifference. Farmer accused Epstein and Maxwell of threatening her safety, destroying her career prospects, and forcing her to repeatedly relocate out of fear of retaliation. She also alleged that federal authorities misled victims about the status of their investigations, failed to enforce even the limited restrictions imposed by Epstein's Florida plea arrangement, and concealed information that could have exposed misconduct within the Justice Department. After requesting FBI records concerning her 1996 and 2006 complaints, Farmer was informed that her Freedom of Information Act request might not be completed until November 2027. She also contacted the DOJ's Inspector General in 2023, but the department subsequently closed her complaint without initiating an internal affairs investigation. Filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act, the lawsuit asserted negligence and negligent or intentional infliction of emotional distress, seeking monetary damages and other relief for the government's alleged failures. Farmer maintained that the FBI and DOJ had numerous opportunities to intervene against Epstein but repeatedly failed to fulfill their responsibilities, allowing his criminal activities to continue while victims suffered the consequences. The filing represented a direct attempt to hold the federal government financially and legally accountable for its historical handling of Epstein, with Farmer arguing that the catastrophe was not simply the result of investigative mistakes but a prolonged failure to enforce laws specifically designed to protect children from sexual exploitation. These were allegations presented in Farmer's complaint, not findings that the government had been held liable.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.281128.1.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: 693epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-the-police-report-that-exposed-him-part-14-17-11-7-26--76216750
What makes the report so haunting is not just what Epstein did, but how unmistakably obvious it all was. The Palm Beach Police Department concluded there was overwhelming probable cause for felony sex crimes, emphasizing that Epstein’s wealth, influence, and legal maneuvering stood in sharp contrast to the credibility and courage of the girls who came forward. The document reads less like a mystery and more like a warning flare—one that spelled out the scope of the abuse long before the world was forced to confront it. In black and white, the report shows that the truth was there early, detailed, and undeniable—raising the uncomfortable question of why it took so long for justice to even begin catching up.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci



source:

Epstein-Docs.pdf (documentcloud.org)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76216750Sat, 07 Nov 2026 15:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciThe Palm Beach police report reads like the opening chapter of a crime saga everyone wishes had ended sooner. In painstaking detail, investigators laid out how Jeffrey Epstein operated a revolving-door abuse scheme out of his Palm Beach...
What makes the report so haunting is not just what Epstein did, but how unmistakably obvious it all was. The Palm Beach Police Department concluded there was overwhelming probable cause for felony sex crimes, emphasizing that Epstein’s wealth, influence, and legal maneuvering stood in sharp contrast to the credibility and courage of the girls who came forward. The document reads less like a mystery and more like a warning flare—one that spelled out the scope of the abuse long before the world was forced to confront it. In black and white, the report shows that the truth was there early, detailed, and undeniable—raising the uncomfortable question of why it took so long for justice to even begin catching up.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci



source:

Epstein-Docs.pdf (documentcloud.org)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3253epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-the-police-report-that-exposed-him-part-11-13-11-7-26--76216748
What makes the report so haunting is not just what Epstein did, but how unmistakably obvious it all was. The Palm Beach Police Department concluded there was overwhelming probable cause for felony sex crimes, emphasizing that Epstein’s wealth, influence, and legal maneuvering stood in sharp contrast to the credibility and courage of the girls who came forward. The document reads less like a mystery and more like a warning flare—one that spelled out the scope of the abuse long before the world was forced to confront it. In black and white, the report shows that the truth was there early, detailed, and undeniable—raising the uncomfortable question of why it took so long for justice to even begin catching up.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci



source:

Epstein-Docs.pdf (documentcloud.org)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76216748Sat, 07 Nov 2026 13:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe Palm Beach police report reads like the opening chapter of a crime saga everyone wishes had ended sooner. In painstaking detail, investigators laid out how Jeffrey Epstein operated a revolving-door abuse scheme out of his Palm Beach...
What makes the report so haunting is not just what Epstein did, but how unmistakably obvious it all was. The Palm Beach Police Department concluded there was overwhelming probable cause for felony sex crimes, emphasizing that Epstein’s wealth, influence, and legal maneuvering stood in sharp contrast to the credibility and courage of the girls who came forward. The document reads less like a mystery and more like a warning flare—one that spelled out the scope of the abuse long before the world was forced to confront it. In black and white, the report shows that the truth was there early, detailed, and undeniable—raising the uncomfortable question of why it took so long for justice to even begin catching up.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci



source:

Epstein-Docs.pdf (documentcloud.org)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2569epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-the-police-report-that-exposed-him-part-8-10-11-7-26--76216749
What makes the report so haunting is not just what Epstein did, but how unmistakably obvious it all was. The Palm Beach Police Department concluded there was overwhelming probable cause for felony sex crimes, emphasizing that Epstein’s wealth, influence, and legal maneuvering stood in sharp contrast to the credibility and courage of the girls who came forward. The document reads less like a mystery and more like a warning flare—one that spelled out the scope of the abuse long before the world was forced to confront it. In black and white, the report shows that the truth was there early, detailed, and undeniable—raising the uncomfortable question of why it took so long for justice to even begin catching up.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci



source:

Epstein-Docs.pdf (documentcloud.org)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76216749Sat, 07 Nov 2026 11:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe Palm Beach police report reads like the opening chapter of a crime saga everyone wishes had ended sooner. In painstaking detail, investigators laid out how Jeffrey Epstein operated a revolving-door abuse scheme out of his Palm Beach...
What makes the report so haunting is not just what Epstein did, but how unmistakably obvious it all was. The Palm Beach Police Department concluded there was overwhelming probable cause for felony sex crimes, emphasizing that Epstein’s wealth, influence, and legal maneuvering stood in sharp contrast to the credibility and courage of the girls who came forward. The document reads less like a mystery and more like a warning flare—one that spelled out the scope of the abuse long before the world was forced to confront it. In black and white, the report shows that the truth was there early, detailed, and undeniable—raising the uncomfortable question of why it took so long for justice to even begin catching up.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci



source:

Epstein-Docs.pdf (documentcloud.org)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2421epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-the-police-report-that-exposed-him-part-5-7-11-7-26--76216751
What makes the report so haunting is not just what Epstein did, but how unmistakably obvious it all was. The Palm Beach Police Department concluded there was overwhelming probable cause for felony sex crimes, emphasizing that Epstein’s wealth, influence, and legal maneuvering stood in sharp contrast to the credibility and courage of the girls who came forward. The document reads less like a mystery and more like a warning flare—one that spelled out the scope of the abuse long before the world was forced to confront it. In black and white, the report shows that the truth was there early, detailed, and undeniable—raising the uncomfortable question of why it took so long for justice to even begin catching up.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci



source:

Epstein-Docs.pdf (documentcloud.org)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76216751Sat, 07 Nov 2026 09:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciThe Palm Beach police report reads like the opening chapter of a crime saga everyone wishes had ended sooner. In painstaking detail, investigators laid out how Jeffrey Epstein operated a revolving-door abuse scheme out of his Palm Beach...
What makes the report so haunting is not just what Epstein did, but how unmistakably obvious it all was. The Palm Beach Police Department concluded there was overwhelming probable cause for felony sex crimes, emphasizing that Epstein’s wealth, influence, and legal maneuvering stood in sharp contrast to the credibility and courage of the girls who came forward. The document reads less like a mystery and more like a warning flare—one that spelled out the scope of the abuse long before the world was forced to confront it. In black and white, the report shows that the truth was there early, detailed, and undeniable—raising the uncomfortable question of why it took so long for justice to even begin catching up.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci



source:

Epstein-Docs.pdf (documentcloud.org)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2598epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-the-police-report-that-exposed-him-part-1-4-11-7-26--76216752
What makes the report so haunting is not just what Epstein did, but how unmistakably obvious it all was. The Palm Beach Police Department concluded there was overwhelming probable cause for felony sex crimes, emphasizing that Epstein’s wealth, influence, and legal maneuvering stood in sharp contrast to the credibility and courage of the girls who came forward. The document reads less like a mystery and more like a warning flare—one that spelled out the scope of the abuse long before the world was forced to confront it. In black and white, the report shows that the truth was there early, detailed, and undeniable—raising the uncomfortable question of why it took so long for justice to even begin catching up.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci



source:

Epstein-Docs.pdf (documentcloud.org)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76216752Sat, 07 Nov 2026 07:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe Palm Beach police report reads like the opening chapter of a crime saga everyone wishes had ended sooner. In painstaking detail, investigators laid out how Jeffrey Epstein operated a revolving-door abuse scheme out of his Palm Beach...
What makes the report so haunting is not just what Epstein did, but how unmistakably obvious it all was. The Palm Beach Police Department concluded there was overwhelming probable cause for felony sex crimes, emphasizing that Epstein’s wealth, influence, and legal maneuvering stood in sharp contrast to the credibility and courage of the girls who came forward. The document reads less like a mystery and more like a warning flare—one that spelled out the scope of the abuse long before the world was forced to confront it. In black and white, the report shows that the truth was there early, detailed, and undeniable—raising the uncomfortable question of why it took so long for justice to even begin catching up.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci



source:

Epstein-Docs.pdf (documentcloud.org)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3311epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-octopus-grows-tentacles-promis-maxwell-mossad-and-epstein-s-network-part-2--76217106
Epstein’s operation followed a parallel structure. Through Ghislaine Maxwell — Robert Maxwell’s daughter — the same networks of access and intelligence may have carried forward into a different form of compromise: sexual blackmail rather than software surveillance. Epstein’s properties were wired for monitoring, his connections spanned politics and finance, and his prosecution was undermined by plea deals and sealed files, much like PROMIS inquiries were stifled by classified reports and redactions. In both scandals, powerful people were protected, evidence was obscured, and key figures died under suspicious circumstances. The echoes between PROMIS and Epstein suggest not isolated scandals but a recurring playbook of intelligence tradecraft: fronts, leverage, secrecy, and coverups designed to protect those at the very top.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76217106Sat, 07 Nov 2026 05:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciThe PROMIS software scandal and the Jeffrey Epstein case, while separated by decades and context, share strikingly similar hallmarks. PROMIS began as a prosecutorial tool but was allegedly modified by intelligence services like Mossad to include...
Epstein’s operation followed a parallel structure. Through Ghislaine Maxwell — Robert Maxwell’s daughter — the same networks of access and intelligence may have carried forward into a different form of compromise: sexual blackmail rather than software surveillance. Epstein’s properties were wired for monitoring, his connections spanned politics and finance, and his prosecution was undermined by plea deals and sealed files, much like PROMIS inquiries were stifled by classified reports and redactions. In both scandals, powerful people were protected, evidence was obscured, and key figures died under suspicious circumstances. The echoes between PROMIS and Epstein suggest not isolated scandals but a recurring playbook of intelligence tradecraft: fronts, leverage, secrecy, and coverups designed to protect those at the very top.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>764epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-octopus-grows-tentacles-promis-maxwell-mossad-and-epstein-s-network-part-1--76217107
Epstein’s operation followed a parallel structure. Through Ghislaine Maxwell — Robert Maxwell’s daughter — the same networks of access and intelligence may have carried forward into a different form of compromise: sexual blackmail rather than software surveillance. Epstein’s properties were wired for monitoring, his connections spanned politics and finance, and his prosecution was undermined by plea deals and sealed files, much like PROMIS inquiries were stifled by classified reports and redactions. In both scandals, powerful people were protected, evidence was obscured, and key figures died under suspicious circumstances. The echoes between PROMIS and Epstein suggest not isolated scandals but a recurring playbook of intelligence tradecraft: fronts, leverage, secrecy, and coverups designed to protect those at the very top.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76217107Sat, 07 Nov 2026 03:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe PROMIS software scandal and the Jeffrey Epstein case, while separated by decades and context, share strikingly similar hallmarks. PROMIS began as a prosecutorial tool but was allegedly modified by intelligence services like Mossad to include...
Epstein’s operation followed a parallel structure. Through Ghislaine Maxwell — Robert Maxwell’s daughter — the same networks of access and intelligence may have carried forward into a different form of compromise: sexual blackmail rather than software surveillance. Epstein’s properties were wired for monitoring, his connections spanned politics and finance, and his prosecution was undermined by plea deals and sealed files, much like PROMIS inquiries were stifled by classified reports and redactions. In both scandals, powerful people were protected, evidence was obscured, and key figures died under suspicious circumstances. The echoes between PROMIS and Epstein suggest not isolated scandals but a recurring playbook of intelligence tradecraft: fronts, leverage, secrecy, and coverups designed to protect those at the very top.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>740epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-day-6-part-18-11-6-26--76198485
The defense concentrated much of its closing argument on the aggravating circumstance that could keep the aggravated-murder charge death-penalty eligible: whether the shooter knowingly created a great risk of death to someone other than Kirk. Attorney Staci Visser stressed that there had been one shot, one bullet and one person struck, arguing that prosecutors were stretching possible dangers—such as a miss, ricochet or pass-through bullet—into proof that another person had actually been placed within the legally required “zone of danger.” Richard Novak separately challenged the state’s evidence concerning political motivation and whether Robinson could reasonably have known children were present. Prosecutor Chad Grunander answered that argument by describing the shot as “ballistic roulette,” emphasizing that Kirk was surrounded by security personnel, a questioner and thousands of spectators and arguing that a slight error in aim could easily have killed someone else. The fundamental dispute at closing was therefore not simply whether the state could identify Robinson as the alleged shooter, but whether prosecutors had established the aggravating circumstances and enhancements necessary to carry the entire case—including its potential death penalty—forward to trial.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76198485Sat, 07 Nov 2026 01:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay six of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing, held September 1, 2026, centered on closing arguments and the prosecution’s claim that the evidence easily cleared Utah’s probable-cause standard. Deputy Utah County Attorney Ryan McBride argued that...
The defense concentrated much of its closing argument on the aggravating circumstance that could keep the aggravated-murder charge death-penalty eligible: whether the shooter knowingly created a great risk of death to someone other than Kirk. Attorney Staci Visser stressed that there had been one shot, one bullet and one person struck, arguing that prosecutors were stretching possible dangers—such as a miss, ricochet or pass-through bullet—into proof that another person had actually been placed within the legally required “zone of danger.” Richard Novak separately challenged the state’s evidence concerning political motivation and whether Robinson could reasonably have known children were present. Prosecutor Chad Grunander answered that argument by describing the shot as “ballistic roulette,” emphasizing that Kirk was surrounded by security personnel, a questioner and thousands of spectators and arguing that a slight error in aim could easily have killed someone else. The fundamental dispute at closing was therefore not simply whether the state could identify Robinson as the alleged shooter, but whether prosecutors had established the aggravating circumstances and enhancements necessary to carry the entire case—including its potential death penalty—forward to trial.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>577breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-day-6-part-17-11-5-26--76198484
The defense concentrated much of its closing argument on the aggravating circumstance that could keep the aggravated-murder charge death-penalty eligible: whether the shooter knowingly created a great risk of death to someone other than Kirk. Attorney Staci Visser stressed that there had been one shot, one bullet and one person struck, arguing that prosecutors were stretching possible dangers—such as a miss, ricochet or pass-through bullet—into proof that another person had actually been placed within the legally required “zone of danger.” Richard Novak separately challenged the state’s evidence concerning political motivation and whether Robinson could reasonably have known children were present. Prosecutor Chad Grunander answered that argument by describing the shot as “ballistic roulette,” emphasizing that Kirk was surrounded by security personnel, a questioner and thousands of spectators and arguing that a slight error in aim could easily have killed someone else. The fundamental dispute at closing was therefore not simply whether the state could identify Robinson as the alleged shooter, but whether prosecutors had established the aggravating circumstances and enhancements necessary to carry the entire case—including its potential death penalty—forward to trial.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76198484Fri, 06 Nov 2026 23:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciDay six of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing, held September 1, 2026, centered on closing arguments and the prosecution’s claim that the evidence easily cleared Utah’s probable-cause standard. Deputy Utah County Attorney Ryan McBride argued that...
The defense concentrated much of its closing argument on the aggravating circumstance that could keep the aggravated-murder charge death-penalty eligible: whether the shooter knowingly created a great risk of death to someone other than Kirk. Attorney Staci Visser stressed that there had been one shot, one bullet and one person struck, arguing that prosecutors were stretching possible dangers—such as a miss, ricochet or pass-through bullet—into proof that another person had actually been placed within the legally required “zone of danger.” Richard Novak separately challenged the state’s evidence concerning political motivation and whether Robinson could reasonably have known children were present. Prosecutor Chad Grunander answered that argument by describing the shot as “ballistic roulette,” emphasizing that Kirk was surrounded by security personnel, a questioner and thousands of spectators and arguing that a slight error in aim could easily have killed someone else. The fundamental dispute at closing was therefore not simply whether the state could identify Robinson as the alleged shooter, but whether prosecutors had established the aggravating circumstances and enhancements necessary to carry the entire case—including its potential death penalty—forward to trial.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>789breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/maria-farmer-sues-the-federal-government-over-its-handling-of-jeffrey-epstein-part-6-11-6-26--76198481
The complaint also detailed Farmer's unsuccessful attempts to obtain accountability from the government after decades of alleged intimidation, emotional trauma, and institutional indifference. Farmer accused Epstein and Maxwell of threatening her safety, destroying her career prospects, and forcing her to repeatedly relocate out of fear of retaliation. She also alleged that federal authorities misled victims about the status of their investigations, failed to enforce even the limited restrictions imposed by Epstein's Florida plea arrangement, and concealed information that could have exposed misconduct within the Justice Department. After requesting FBI records concerning her 1996 and 2006 complaints, Farmer was informed that her Freedom of Information Act request might not be completed until November 2027. She also contacted the DOJ's Inspector General in 2023, but the department subsequently closed her complaint without initiating an internal affairs investigation. Filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act, the lawsuit asserted negligence and negligent or intentional infliction of emotional distress, seeking monetary damages and other relief for the government's alleged failures. Farmer maintained that the FBI and DOJ had numerous opportunities to intervene against Epstein but repeatedly failed to fulfill their responsibilities, allowing his criminal activities to continue while victims suffered the consequences. The filing represented a direct attempt to hold the federal government financially and legally accountable for its historical handling of Epstein, with Farmer arguing that the catastrophe was not simply the result of investigative mistakes but a prolonged failure to enforce laws specifically designed to protect children from sexual exploitation. These were allegations presented in Farmer's complaint, not findings that the government had been held liable.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.281128.1.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76198481Fri, 06 Nov 2026 21:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciOn May 29, 2025, Jeffrey Epstein survivor Maria Farmer filed a 63-page federal lawsuit against the United States government, accusing the FBI, Department of Justice, and federal prosecutors of decades of negligence that allowed Epstein and Ghislaine...
The complaint also detailed Farmer's unsuccessful attempts to obtain accountability from the government after decades of alleged intimidation, emotional trauma, and institutional indifference. Farmer accused Epstein and Maxwell of threatening her safety, destroying her career prospects, and forcing her to repeatedly relocate out of fear of retaliation. She also alleged that federal authorities misled victims about the status of their investigations, failed to enforce even the limited restrictions imposed by Epstein's Florida plea arrangement, and concealed information that could have exposed misconduct within the Justice Department. After requesting FBI records concerning her 1996 and 2006 complaints, Farmer was informed that her Freedom of Information Act request might not be completed until November 2027. She also contacted the DOJ's Inspector General in 2023, but the department subsequently closed her complaint without initiating an internal affairs investigation. Filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act, the lawsuit asserted negligence and negligent or intentional infliction of emotional distress, seeking monetary damages and other relief for the government's alleged failures. Farmer maintained that the FBI and DOJ had numerous opportunities to intervene against Epstein but repeatedly failed to fulfill their responsibilities, allowing his criminal activities to continue while victims suffered the consequences. The filing represented a direct attempt to hold the federal government financially and legally accountable for its historical handling of Epstein, with Farmer arguing that the catastrophe was not simply the result of investigative mistakes but a prolonged failure to enforce laws specifically designed to protect children from sexual exploitation. These were allegations presented in Farmer's complaint, not findings that the government had been held liable.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.281128.1.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: 656epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/maria-farmer-sues-the-federal-government-over-its-handling-of-jeffrey-epstein-part-5-11-6-26--76198478
The complaint also detailed Farmer's unsuccessful attempts to obtain accountability from the government after decades of alleged intimidation, emotional trauma, and institutional indifference. Farmer accused Epstein and Maxwell of threatening her safety, destroying her career prospects, and forcing her to repeatedly relocate out of fear of retaliation. She also alleged that federal authorities misled victims about the status of their investigations, failed to enforce even the limited restrictions imposed by Epstein's Florida plea arrangement, and concealed information that could have exposed misconduct within the Justice Department. After requesting FBI records concerning her 1996 and 2006 complaints, Farmer was informed that her Freedom of Information Act request might not be completed until November 2027. She also contacted the DOJ's Inspector General in 2023, but the department subsequently closed her complaint without initiating an internal affairs investigation. Filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act, the lawsuit asserted negligence and negligent or intentional infliction of emotional distress, seeking monetary damages and other relief for the government's alleged failures. Farmer maintained that the FBI and DOJ had numerous opportunities to intervene against Epstein but repeatedly failed to fulfill their responsibilities, allowing his criminal activities to continue while victims suffered the consequences. The filing represented a direct attempt to hold the federal government financially and legally accountable for its historical handling of Epstein, with Farmer arguing that the catastrophe was not simply the result of investigative mistakes but a prolonged failure to enforce laws specifically designed to protect children from sexual exploitation. These were allegations presented in Farmer's complaint, not findings that the government had been held liable.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.281128.1.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76198478Fri, 06 Nov 2026 19:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciOn May 29, 2025, Jeffrey Epstein survivor Maria Farmer filed a 63-page federal lawsuit against the United States government, accusing the FBI, Department of Justice, and federal prosecutors of decades of negligence that allowed Epstein and Ghislaine...
The complaint also detailed Farmer's unsuccessful attempts to obtain accountability from the government after decades of alleged intimidation, emotional trauma, and institutional indifference. Farmer accused Epstein and Maxwell of threatening her safety, destroying her career prospects, and forcing her to repeatedly relocate out of fear of retaliation. She also alleged that federal authorities misled victims about the status of their investigations, failed to enforce even the limited restrictions imposed by Epstein's Florida plea arrangement, and concealed information that could have exposed misconduct within the Justice Department. After requesting FBI records concerning her 1996 and 2006 complaints, Farmer was informed that her Freedom of Information Act request might not be completed until November 2027. She also contacted the DOJ's Inspector General in 2023, but the department subsequently closed her complaint without initiating an internal affairs investigation. Filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act, the lawsuit asserted negligence and negligent or intentional infliction of emotional distress, seeking monetary damages and other relief for the government's alleged failures. Farmer maintained that the FBI and DOJ had numerous opportunities to intervene against Epstein but repeatedly failed to fulfill their responsibilities, allowing his criminal activities to continue while victims suffered the consequences. The filing represented a direct attempt to hold the federal government financially and legally accountable for its historical handling of Epstein, with Farmer arguing that the catastrophe was not simply the result of investigative mistakes but a prolonged failure to enforce laws specifically designed to protect children from sexual exploitation. These were allegations presented in Farmer's complaint, not findings that the government had been held liable.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.281128.1.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: 824epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/democrats-prepare-to-investigate-jpmorgan-s-financial-relationship-with-jeffrey-epstein-11-6-26--76213269
JPMorgan's relationship with Epstein has already produced substantial legal and financial consequences, including a $290 million settlement with survivors and a separate $75 million settlement with the U.S. Virgin Islands in 2023, both reached without admissions of wrongdoing. During the Virgin Islands litigation, government attorneys accused the bank of facilitating Epstein's trafficking enterprise by processing enormous sums of money while failing to adequately respond to suspicious financial activity. Attorney Mimi Liu argued that JPMorgan had effectively operated as a financial services provider for Epstein's trafficking operation and criticized the institution for filing extensive suspicious activity reports only after his death in 2019. Wyden's investigators have separately identified significant discrepancies in the bank's reporting, including approximately $1.3 billion in transactions flagged after Epstein's death, compared with a much smaller amount reported during the years when he was operating. JPMorgan has maintained that it did not knowingly facilitate Epstein's crimes, arguing that federal authorities possessed information about his activities that was never shared with the bank. The institution has also placed considerable responsibility on former executive Jes Staley, who has denied knowing about Epstein's criminal conduct. With Democrats preparing to assume congressional leadership in January, investigators could pursue internal communications, compliance records, financial transactions, and sworn testimony concerning what JPMorgan executives knew and when they knew it. The proposed investigation has not yet produced new findings, but it threatens to reopen serious questions about the financial infrastructure that allowed Epstein to move enormous sums of money while continuing his abuse, and whether the banking executives responsible for maintaining those relationships have ever been adequately held accountable.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Dems could grill JPMorgan on Jeffrey Epstein ties once they take control of Congress: report

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76213269Fri, 06 Nov 2026 17:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciDemocrats are reportedly preparing to launch a major congressional investigation into JPMorgan Chase's longstanding financial relationship with Jeffrey Epstein after winning control of both chambers of Congress in the 2026 midterm elections. According...
JPMorgan's relationship with Epstein has already produced substantial legal and financial consequences, including a $290 million settlement with survivors and a separate $75 million settlement with the U.S. Virgin Islands in 2023, both reached without admissions of wrongdoing. During the Virgin Islands litigation, government attorneys accused the bank of facilitating Epstein's trafficking enterprise by processing enormous sums of money while failing to adequately respond to suspicious financial activity. Attorney Mimi Liu argued that JPMorgan had effectively operated as a financial services provider for Epstein's trafficking operation and criticized the institution for filing extensive suspicious activity reports only after his death in 2019. Wyden's investigators have separately identified significant discrepancies in the bank's reporting, including approximately $1.3 billion in transactions flagged after Epstein's death, compared with a much smaller amount reported during the years when he was operating. JPMorgan has maintained that it did not knowingly facilitate Epstein's crimes, arguing that federal authorities possessed information about his activities that was never shared with the bank. The institution has also placed considerable responsibility on former executive Jes Staley, who has denied knowing about Epstein's criminal conduct. With Democrats preparing to assume congressional leadership in January, investigators could pursue internal communications, compliance records, financial transactions, and sworn testimony concerning what JPMorgan executives knew and when they knew it. The proposed investigation has not yet produced new findings, but it threatens to reopen serious questions about the financial infrastructure that allowed Epstein to move enormous sums of money while continuing his abuse, and whether the banking executives responsible for maintaining those relationships have ever been adequately held accountable.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

875epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/leon-black-sues-congressman-robert-garcia-for-defamation-over-jeffrey-epstein-allegations-11-6-26--76198480
The lawsuit follows months of congressional scrutiny surrounding Black's extraordinary financial relationship with Epstein, including the approximately $158 million that an Apollo-commissioned investigation determined Black paid Epstein between 2012 and 2017 for purported tax, estate planning, and other financial services. Those payments continued years after Epstein's 2008 conviction involving the solicitation of a minor, raising significant questions among lawmakers about why Black maintained such an enormously lucrative relationship with a registered sex offender. Black appeared for a voluntary interview before the House Oversight Committee in June 2026 but refused to answer certain questions concerning nondisclosure agreements, prompting the committee to issue subpoenas demanding additional testimony and documents. When Black subsequently refused to comply, the House voted in September to hold him in contempt of Congress, while his attorneys characterized the investigation as an abuse of congressional authority. Garcia supported the contempt proceedings and repeatedly emphasized the need to investigate whether Black's enormous payments helped finance Epstein's criminal operation. The financial relationship has also attracted scrutiny from Senator Ron Wyden, whose investigation raised questions about the legitimacy of the payments and the financial institutions that processed them. Against that backdrop, Black's decision to sue Garcia personally introduces another legal battle into the broader congressional investigation of Epstein's associates, placing the congressman's public accusations and Black's denials at the center of a dispute that could have significant consequences for both men.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Leon Black sues Robert Garcia, alleging defamation over Epstein comments

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76198480Fri, 06 Nov 2026 15:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciLeon Black, the billionaire investor and co-founder of Apollo Global Management, filed a federal defamation lawsuit against Democratic Representative Robert Garcia on November 4, 2026, accusing the congressman of making false and damaging statements...
The lawsuit follows months of congressional scrutiny surrounding Black's extraordinary financial relationship with Epstein, including the approximately $158 million that an Apollo-commissioned investigation determined Black paid Epstein between 2012 and 2017 for purported tax, estate planning, and other financial services. Those payments continued years after Epstein's 2008 conviction involving the solicitation of a minor, raising significant questions among lawmakers about why Black maintained such an enormously lucrative relationship with a registered sex offender. Black appeared for a voluntary interview before the House Oversight Committee in June 2026 but refused to answer certain questions concerning nondisclosure agreements, prompting the committee to issue subpoenas demanding additional testimony and documents. When Black subsequently refused to comply, the House voted in September to hold him in contempt of Congress, while his attorneys characterized the investigation as an abuse of congressional authority. Garcia supported the contempt proceedings and repeatedly emphasized the need to investigate whether Black's enormous payments helped finance Epstein's criminal operation. The financial relationship has also attracted scrutiny from Senator Ron Wyden, whose investigation raised questions about the legitimacy of the payments and the financial institutions that processed them. Against that backdrop, Black's decision to sue Garcia personally introduces another legal battle into the broader congressional investigation of Epstein's associates, placing the congressman's public accusations and Black's denials at the center of a dispute that could have significant consequences for both men.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Leon Black sues Robert Garcia, alleging defamation over Epstein comments

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>678epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/todd-blanche-and-the-epstein-coverup-is-a-reckoning-coming-11-6-26--76198479
With the 2026 midterm elections behind them and Democrats preparing to control Congress, Blanche's conduct should become a central focus of renewed congressional oversight. Lawmakers should demand his communications surrounding the Maxwell interview, investigate the circumstances of her prison transfer, examine the department's handling of withheld Epstein records, and determine whether political considerations influenced investigative decisions. The refusal to appoint an independent special counsel has only deepened concerns about a Justice Department being asked to investigate its own leadership. Blanche's critics argue that his conduct reflects an attorney general whose allegiance to Trump has repeatedly overshadowed his responsibility to the American people, making his continued leadership increasingly difficult to defend. The incoming Congress now faces a defining test of whether its promises of Epstein-related accountability will produce meaningful investigations, sworn testimony, and consequences for misconduct, or collapse into another round of empty political theater while the officials responsible for these decisions escape serious scrutiny.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76198479Fri, 06 Nov 2026 13:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciTodd Blanche has emerged as one of the most controversial figures in the Trump administration’s handling of the Jeffrey Epstein scandal, facing mounting criticism over his loyalty to Donald Trump, his treatment of survivors, and his oversight of the...
With the 2026 midterm elections behind them and Democrats preparing to control Congress, Blanche's conduct should become a central focus of renewed congressional oversight. Lawmakers should demand his communications surrounding the Maxwell interview, investigate the circumstances of her prison transfer, examine the department's handling of withheld Epstein records, and determine whether political considerations influenced investigative decisions. The refusal to appoint an independent special counsel has only deepened concerns about a Justice Department being asked to investigate its own leadership. Blanche's critics argue that his conduct reflects an attorney general whose allegiance to Trump has repeatedly overshadowed his responsibility to the American people, making his continued leadership increasingly difficult to defend. The incoming Congress now faces a defining test of whether its promises of Epstein-related accountability will produce meaningful investigations, sworn testimony, and consequences for misconduct, or collapse into another round of empty political theater while the officials responsible for these decisions escape serious scrutiny.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>945epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-prince-andrew-has-perfected-the-art-of-ducking-accountability-11-6-26--76196526Prince Andrew spent years avoiding questioning by American federal investigators about his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, despite publicly promising to cooperate with law enforcement following his disastrous November 2019 BBC Newsnight interview. After stepping away from royal duties, Andrew declared that he was willing to assist any appropriate law enforcement agency investigating Epstein and his associates. However, when prosecutors from the Southern District of New York and the FBI attempted to arrange an interview, the prince's apparent willingness to cooperate quickly evaporated. In January 2020, U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman publicly revealed that Andrew had provided no cooperation whatsoever, despite repeated attempts to contact his legal representatives. By June, Berman accused Andrew of falsely portraying himself as willing to assist investigators, revealing that his attorneys had explicitly informed prosecutors months earlier that he would not submit to an interview. Andrew's legal team disputed those accusations, claiming that he had offered assistance on three separate occasions, but no interview materialized. The contradiction between Andrew's public promises and his refusal to sit down with investigators raised serious questions about why someone who insiste

The standoff became even more contentious when American authorities pursued a formal mutual legal assistance request through the British government in an attempt to secure Andrew's testimony. According to Berman, prosecutors encountered repeated obstacles when attempting to communicate with Buckingham Palace, Andrew's attorneys, and British officials, leaving them unable to obtain the interview they had sought. In his subsequent account of the investigation, Berman questioned whether influential figures within the British establishment had helped shield Andrew from American scrutiny. Meanwhile, Virginia Roberts Giuffre and her attorneys repeatedly criticized the prince's refusal to cooperate, particularly given her allegations that Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell had trafficked her to Andrew for sexual abuse when she was 17 years old. Andrew continued denying those allegations and ultimately settled Giuffre's civil lawsuit in February 2022 without admitting liability, avoiding the prospect of being questioned under oath during a public trial. His conduct left an extraordinary contradiction at the center of the Epstein investigation: a senior member of the British royal family who repeatedly professed his willingness to help uncover the truth, yet never provided the substantive interview American prosecutors had requested. The years of legal maneuvering and unfulfilled promises reinforced concerns that Andrew's wealth, connections, and royal status had allowed him to resist scrutiny that an ordinary witness would have found far more difficult to avoid.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76196526Fri, 06 Nov 2026 11:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciPrince Andrew spent years avoiding questioning by American federal investigators about his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, despite publicly promising to cooperate with law enforcement following his disastrous November 2019 BBC Newsnight interview....Prince Andrew spent years avoiding questioning by American federal investigators about his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, despite publicly promising to cooperate with law enforcement following his disastrous November 2019 BBC Newsnight interview. After stepping away from royal duties, Andrew declared that he was willing to assist any appropriate law enforcement agency investigating Epstein and his associates. However, when prosecutors from the Southern District of New York and the FBI attempted to arrange an interview, the prince's apparent willingness to cooperate quickly evaporated. In January 2020, U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman publicly revealed that Andrew had provided no cooperation whatsoever, despite repeated attempts to contact his legal representatives. By June, Berman accused Andrew of falsely portraying himself as willing to assist investigators, revealing that his attorneys had explicitly informed prosecutors months earlier that he would not submit to an interview. Andrew's legal team disputed those accusations, claiming that he had offered assistance on three separate occasions, but no interview materialized. The contradiction between Andrew's public promises and his refusal to sit down with investigators raised serious questions about why someone who insiste

The standoff became even more contentious when American authorities pursued a formal mutual legal assistance request through the British government in an attempt to secure Andrew's testimony. According to Berman, prosecutors encountered repeated obstacles when attempting to communicate with Buckingham Palace, Andrew's attorneys, and British officials, leaving them unable to obtain the interview they had sought. In his subsequent account of the investigation, Berman questioned whether influential figures within the British establishment had helped shield Andrew from American scrutiny. Meanwhile, Virginia Roberts Giuffre and her attorneys repeatedly criticized the prince's refusal to cooperate, particularly given her allegations that Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell had trafficked her to Andrew for sexual abuse when she was 17 years old. Andrew continued denying those allegations and ultimately settled Giuffre's civil lawsuit in February 2022 without admitting liability, avoiding the prospect of being questioned under oath during a public trial. His conduct left an extraordinary contradiction at the center of the Epstein investigation: a senior member of the British royal family who repeatedly professed his willingness to help uncover the truth, yet never provided the substantive interview American prosecutors had requested. The years of legal maneuvering and unfulfilled promises reinforced concerns that Andrew's wealth, connections, and royal status had allowed him to resist scrutiny that an ordinary witness would have found far more difficult to avoid.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2722epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-marc-rowan-and-leon-black-outmaneuver-josh-harris-to-keep-control-at-apollo-11-6-26--76196525
Harris did not get the prize. Instead, Marc Rowan emerged as the compromise successor and ultimately took over as Apollo’s CEO, while Black’s influence and board support helped block Harris from becoming the dominant figure. The result was a bitter private-equity civil war: Black was forced out by the Epstein fallout, Harris failed to convert the moment into control of Apollo, and Rowan became the beneficiary of the chaos. Harris later stepped away from day-to-day Apollo leadership and eventually focused more on his outside business and sports ownership interests, while Apollo tried to sell Rowan’s rise as a clean reset after the Epstein damage. The irony is brutal: Epstein’s relationship with Black created the opening Harris wanted, but the internal power structure Harris helped build at Apollo ultimately closed around Rowan instead.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76196525Fri, 06 Nov 2026 09:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJosh Harris saw the Epstein revelations around Leon Black as an opening to reshape Apollo’s leadership and, according to reporting and later court allegations, pushed to position himself as the natural successor or power center inside the firm....
Harris did not get the prize. Instead, Marc Rowan emerged as the compromise successor and ultimately took over as Apollo’s CEO, while Black’s influence and board support helped block Harris from becoming the dominant figure. The result was a bitter private-equity civil war: Black was forced out by the Epstein fallout, Harris failed to convert the moment into control of Apollo, and Rowan became the beneficiary of the chaos. Harris later stepped away from day-to-day Apollo leadership and eventually focused more on his outside business and sports ownership interests, while Apollo tried to sell Rowan’s rise as a clean reset after the Epstein damage. The irony is brutal: Epstein’s relationship with Black created the opening Harris wanted, but the internal power structure Harris helped build at Apollo ultimately closed around Rowan instead.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2524epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-ghislaine-maxwell-and-the-lawyers-she-brought-in-to-defend-her-11-5-26--76196527
Following her conviction, Maxwell turned to another prominent group of attorneys to challenge the verdict through the federal appeals process. Her appellate team included Arthur Aidala, Diana Fabi Samson, and former New York Supreme Court Justice John Leventhal, who argued before the Second Circuit that Maxwell had been improperly prosecuted, denied a fair trial, and subjected to legal errors that warranted overturning her conviction. Their arguments focused heavily on Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, disputed jury selection issues, the statute of limitations, and alleged problems with the trial judge's instructions. However, in September 2024, the Second Circuit unanimously rejected the appeal and upheld Maxwell's conviction and sentence. Maxwell subsequently retained Miami-based criminal defense attorney David Oscar Markus, who pursued further challenges, including an unsuccessful petition to the United States Supreme Court, while also representing her in later dealings with federal authorities. Despite assembling successive teams of highly experienced criminal defense and appellate attorneys, Maxwell failed to overturn her conviction, demonstrating that even substantial financial resources and aggressive legal representation could not undo the verdict reached by the jury.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76196527Fri, 06 Nov 2026 07:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciFollowing her arrest in July 2020, Ghislaine Maxwell assembled an experienced and expensive legal defense team to fight federal sex trafficking charges connected to Jeffrey Epstein's abuse of underage girls. Her attorneys included veteran criminal...
Following her conviction, Maxwell turned to another prominent group of attorneys to challenge the verdict through the federal appeals process. Her appellate team included Arthur Aidala, Diana Fabi Samson, and former New York Supreme Court Justice John Leventhal, who argued before the Second Circuit that Maxwell had been improperly prosecuted, denied a fair trial, and subjected to legal errors that warranted overturning her conviction. Their arguments focused heavily on Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, disputed jury selection issues, the statute of limitations, and alleged problems with the trial judge's instructions. However, in September 2024, the Second Circuit unanimously rejected the appeal and upheld Maxwell's conviction and sentence. Maxwell subsequently retained Miami-based criminal defense attorney David Oscar Markus, who pursued further challenges, including an unsuccessful petition to the United States Supreme Court, while also representing her in later dealings with federal authorities. Despite assembling successive teams of highly experienced criminal defense and appellate attorneys, Maxwell failed to overturn her conviction, demonstrating that even substantial financial resources and aggressive legal representation could not undo the verdict reached by the jury.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3274epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/dual-sovereignty-the-legal-sledgehammer-waiting-for-ghislaine-maxwell-if-pardoned-part-2--76197438
New York has already demonstrated its willingness to pursue high-profile sex trafficking and abuse cases, particularly when federal accountability fails or falters. The state has broad human trafficking, sexual abuse, and child endangerment laws that overlap with Maxwell’s federally convicted conduct. If prosecutors believe there is sufficient evidence that Maxwell’s crimes occurred within New York’s jurisdiction or harmed residents of the state, they could initiate charges anew under state law. In fact, the political and public appetite for state-level accountability could intensify following a federal pardon, as it would be seen by many as a miscarriage of justice. In that case, dual sovereignty becomes not just a legal tool—but a last-resort mechanism to ensure that Maxwell still faces consequences.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76197438Fri, 06 Nov 2026 05:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIf Donald Trump were to issue a presidential pardon to Ghislaine Maxwell for her federal crimes, the doctrine of dual sovereignty could allow the state of New York to pursue separate charges against her without violating the Double Jeopardy Clause of...
New York has already demonstrated its willingness to pursue high-profile sex trafficking and abuse cases, particularly when federal accountability fails or falters. The state has broad human trafficking, sexual abuse, and child endangerment laws that overlap with Maxwell’s federally convicted conduct. If prosecutors believe there is sufficient evidence that Maxwell’s crimes occurred within New York’s jurisdiction or harmed residents of the state, they could initiate charges anew under state law. In fact, the political and public appetite for state-level accountability could intensify following a federal pardon, as it would be seen by many as a miscarriage of justice. In that case, dual sovereignty becomes not just a legal tool—but a last-resort mechanism to ensure that Maxwell still faces consequences.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>683epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/dual-sovereignty-the-legal-sledgehammer-waiting-for-ghislaine-maxwell-if-pardoned-part-1--76197439
New York has already demonstrated its willingness to pursue high-profile sex trafficking and abuse cases, particularly when federal accountability fails or falters. The state has broad human trafficking, sexual abuse, and child endangerment laws that overlap with Maxwell’s federally convicted conduct. If prosecutors believe there is sufficient evidence that Maxwell’s crimes occurred within New York’s jurisdiction or harmed residents of the state, they could initiate charges anew under state law. In fact, the political and public appetite for state-level accountability could intensify following a federal pardon, as it would be seen by many as a miscarriage of justice. In that case, dual sovereignty becomes not just a legal tool—but a last-resort mechanism to ensure that Maxwell still faces consequences.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76197439Fri, 06 Nov 2026 03:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciIf Donald Trump were to issue a presidential pardon to Ghislaine Maxwell for her federal crimes, the doctrine of dual sovereignty could allow the state of New York to pursue separate charges against her without violating the Double Jeopardy Clause of...
New York has already demonstrated its willingness to pursue high-profile sex trafficking and abuse cases, particularly when federal accountability fails or falters. The state has broad human trafficking, sexual abuse, and child endangerment laws that overlap with Maxwell’s federally convicted conduct. If prosecutors believe there is sufficient evidence that Maxwell’s crimes occurred within New York’s jurisdiction or harmed residents of the state, they could initiate charges anew under state law. In fact, the political and public appetite for state-level accountability could intensify following a federal pardon, as it would be seen by many as a miscarriage of justice. In that case, dual sovereignty becomes not just a legal tool—but a last-resort mechanism to ensure that Maxwell still faces consequences.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>695epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-day-6-part-16-11-5-26--76179348
The defense concentrated much of its closing argument on the aggravating circumstance that could keep the aggravated-murder charge death-penalty eligible: whether the shooter knowingly created a great risk of death to someone other than Kirk. Attorney Staci Visser stressed that there had been one shot, one bullet and one person struck, arguing that prosecutors were stretching possible dangers—such as a miss, ricochet or pass-through bullet—into proof that another person had actually been placed within the legally required “zone of danger.” Richard Novak separately challenged the state’s evidence concerning political motivation and whether Robinson could reasonably have known children were present. Prosecutor Chad Grunander answered that argument by describing the shot as “ballistic roulette,” emphasizing that Kirk was surrounded by security personnel, a questioner and thousands of spectators and arguing that a slight error in aim could easily have killed someone else. The fundamental dispute at closing was therefore not simply whether the state could identify Robinson as the alleged shooter, but whether prosecutors had established the aggravating circumstances and enhancements necessary to carry the entire case—including its potential death penalty—forward to trial.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76179348Fri, 06 Nov 2026 01:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay six of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing, held September 1, 2026, centered on closing arguments and the prosecution’s claim that the evidence easily cleared Utah’s probable-cause standard. Deputy Utah County Attorney Ryan McBride argued that...
The defense concentrated much of its closing argument on the aggravating circumstance that could keep the aggravated-murder charge death-penalty eligible: whether the shooter knowingly created a great risk of death to someone other than Kirk. Attorney Staci Visser stressed that there had been one shot, one bullet and one person struck, arguing that prosecutors were stretching possible dangers—such as a miss, ricochet or pass-through bullet—into proof that another person had actually been placed within the legally required “zone of danger.” Richard Novak separately challenged the state’s evidence concerning political motivation and whether Robinson could reasonably have known children were present. Prosecutor Chad Grunander answered that argument by describing the shot as “ballistic roulette,” emphasizing that Kirk was surrounded by security personnel, a questioner and thousands of spectators and arguing that a slight error in aim could easily have killed someone else. The fundamental dispute at closing was therefore not simply whether the state could identify Robinson as the alleged shooter, but whether prosecutors had established the aggravating circumstances and enhancements necessary to carry the entire case—including its potential death penalty—forward to trial.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>693breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-day-6-part-15-11-4-26--76158883
The defense concentrated much of its closing argument on the aggravating circumstance that could keep the aggravated-murder charge death-penalty eligible: whether the shooter knowingly created a great risk of death to someone other than Kirk. Attorney Staci Visser stressed that there had been one shot, one bullet and one person struck, arguing that prosecutors were stretching possible dangers—such as a miss, ricochet or pass-through bullet—into proof that another person had actually been placed within the legally required “zone of danger.” Richard Novak separately challenged the state’s evidence concerning political motivation and whether Robinson could reasonably have known children were present. Prosecutor Chad Grunander answered that argument by describing the shot as “ballistic roulette,” emphasizing that Kirk was surrounded by security personnel, a questioner and thousands of spectators and arguing that a slight error in aim could easily have killed someone else. The fundamental dispute at closing was therefore not simply whether the state could identify Robinson as the alleged shooter, but whether prosecutors had established the aggravating circumstances and enhancements necessary to carry the entire case—including its potential death penalty—forward to trial.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76158883Thu, 05 Nov 2026 23:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay six of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing, held September 1, 2026, centered on closing arguments and the prosecution’s claim that the evidence easily cleared Utah’s probable-cause standard. Deputy Utah County Attorney Ryan McBride argued that...
The defense concentrated much of its closing argument on the aggravating circumstance that could keep the aggravated-murder charge death-penalty eligible: whether the shooter knowingly created a great risk of death to someone other than Kirk. Attorney Staci Visser stressed that there had been one shot, one bullet and one person struck, arguing that prosecutors were stretching possible dangers—such as a miss, ricochet or pass-through bullet—into proof that another person had actually been placed within the legally required “zone of danger.” Richard Novak separately challenged the state’s evidence concerning political motivation and whether Robinson could reasonably have known children were present. Prosecutor Chad Grunander answered that argument by describing the shot as “ballistic roulette,” emphasizing that Kirk was surrounded by security personnel, a questioner and thousands of spectators and arguing that a slight error in aim could easily have killed someone else. The fundamental dispute at closing was therefore not simply whether the state could identify Robinson as the alleged shooter, but whether prosecutors had established the aggravating circumstances and enhancements necessary to carry the entire case—including its potential death penalty—forward to trial.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>646epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/maria-farmer-sues-the-federal-government-over-its-handling-of-jeffrey-epstein-part-4-11-4-26--76179343
The complaint also detailed Farmer's unsuccessful attempts to obtain accountability from the government after decades of alleged intimidation, emotional trauma, and institutional indifference. Farmer accused Epstein and Maxwell of threatening her safety, destroying her career prospects, and forcing her to repeatedly relocate out of fear of retaliation. She also alleged that federal authorities misled victims about the status of their investigations, failed to enforce even the limited restrictions imposed by Epstein's Florida plea arrangement, and concealed information that could have exposed misconduct within the Justice Department. After requesting FBI records concerning her 1996 and 2006 complaints, Farmer was informed that her Freedom of Information Act request might not be completed until November 2027. She also contacted the DOJ's Inspector General in 2023, but the department subsequently closed her complaint without initiating an internal affairs investigation. Filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act, the lawsuit asserted negligence and negligent or intentional infliction of emotional distress, seeking monetary damages and other relief for the government's alleged failures. Farmer maintained that the FBI and DOJ had numerous opportunities to intervene against Epstein but repeatedly failed to fulfill their responsibilities, allowing his criminal activities to continue while victims suffered the consequences. The filing represented a direct attempt to hold the federal government financially and legally accountable for its historical handling of Epstein, with Farmer arguing that the catastrophe was not simply the result of investigative mistakes but a prolonged failure to enforce laws specifically designed to protect children from sexual exploitation. These were allegations presented in Farmer's complaint, not findings that the government had been held liable.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.281128.1.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76179343Thu, 05 Nov 2026 21:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciOn May 29, 2025, Jeffrey Epstein survivor Maria Farmer filed a 63-page federal lawsuit against the United States government, accusing the FBI, Department of Justice, and federal prosecutors of decades of negligence that allowed Epstein and Ghislaine...
The complaint also detailed Farmer's unsuccessful attempts to obtain accountability from the government after decades of alleged intimidation, emotional trauma, and institutional indifference. Farmer accused Epstein and Maxwell of threatening her safety, destroying her career prospects, and forcing her to repeatedly relocate out of fear of retaliation. She also alleged that federal authorities misled victims about the status of their investigations, failed to enforce even the limited restrictions imposed by Epstein's Florida plea arrangement, and concealed information that could have exposed misconduct within the Justice Department. After requesting FBI records concerning her 1996 and 2006 complaints, Farmer was informed that her Freedom of Information Act request might not be completed until November 2027. She also contacted the DOJ's Inspector General in 2023, but the department subsequently closed her complaint without initiating an internal affairs investigation. Filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act, the lawsuit asserted negligence and negligent or intentional infliction of emotional distress, seeking monetary damages and other relief for the government's alleged failures. Farmer maintained that the FBI and DOJ had numerous opportunities to intervene against Epstein but repeatedly failed to fulfill their responsibilities, allowing his criminal activities to continue while victims suffered the consequences. The filing represented a direct attempt to hold the federal government financially and legally accountable for its historical handling of Epstein, with Farmer arguing that the catastrophe was not simply the result of investigative mistakes but a prolonged failure to enforce laws specifically designed to protect children from sexual exploitation. These were allegations presented in Farmer's complaint, not findings that the government had been held liable.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.281128.1.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: 653epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/maria-farmer-sues-the-federal-government-over-its-handling-of-jeffrey-epstein-part-3-11-4-26--76158880
The complaint also detailed Farmer's unsuccessful attempts to obtain accountability from the government after decades of alleged intimidation, emotional trauma, and institutional indifference. Farmer accused Epstein and Maxwell of threatening her safety, destroying her career prospects, and forcing her to repeatedly relocate out of fear of retaliation. She also alleged that federal authorities misled victims about the status of their investigations, failed to enforce even the limited restrictions imposed by Epstein's Florida plea arrangement, and concealed information that could have exposed misconduct within the Justice Department. After requesting FBI records concerning her 1996 and 2006 complaints, Farmer was informed that her Freedom of Information Act request might not be completed until November 2027. She also contacted the DOJ's Inspector General in 2023, but the department subsequently closed her complaint without initiating an internal affairs investigation. Filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act, the lawsuit asserted negligence and negligent or intentional infliction of emotional distress, seeking monetary damages and other relief for the government's alleged failures. Farmer maintained that the FBI and DOJ had numerous opportunities to intervene against Epstein but repeatedly failed to fulfill their responsibilities, allowing his criminal activities to continue while victims suffered the consequences. The filing represented a direct attempt to hold the federal government financially and legally accountable for its historical handling of Epstein, with Farmer arguing that the catastrophe was not simply the result of investigative mistakes but a prolonged failure to enforce laws specifically designed to protect children from sexual exploitation. These were allegations presented in Farmer's complaint, not findings that the government had been held liable.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.281128.1.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76158880Thu, 05 Nov 2026 19:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciOn May 29, 2025, Jeffrey Epstein survivor Maria Farmer filed a 63-page federal lawsuit against the United States government, accusing the FBI, Department of Justice, and federal prosecutors of decades of negligence that allowed Epstein and Ghislaine...
The complaint also detailed Farmer's unsuccessful attempts to obtain accountability from the government after decades of alleged intimidation, emotional trauma, and institutional indifference. Farmer accused Epstein and Maxwell of threatening her safety, destroying her career prospects, and forcing her to repeatedly relocate out of fear of retaliation. She also alleged that federal authorities misled victims about the status of their investigations, failed to enforce even the limited restrictions imposed by Epstein's Florida plea arrangement, and concealed information that could have exposed misconduct within the Justice Department. After requesting FBI records concerning her 1996 and 2006 complaints, Farmer was informed that her Freedom of Information Act request might not be completed until November 2027. She also contacted the DOJ's Inspector General in 2023, but the department subsequently closed her complaint without initiating an internal affairs investigation. Filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act, the lawsuit asserted negligence and negligent or intentional infliction of emotional distress, seeking monetary damages and other relief for the government's alleged failures. Farmer maintained that the FBI and DOJ had numerous opportunities to intervene against Epstein but repeatedly failed to fulfill their responsibilities, allowing his criminal activities to continue while victims suffered the consequences. The filing represented a direct attempt to hold the federal government financially and legally accountable for its historical handling of Epstein, with Farmer arguing that the catastrophe was not simply the result of investigative mistakes but a prolonged failure to enforce laws specifically designed to protect children from sexual exploitation. These were allegations presented in Farmer's complaint, not findings that the government had been held liable.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.281128.1.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: 685epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-epstein-investigation-enters-a-new-era-following-the-2026-midterm-elections-11-5-26--76193319
Democratic control of Congress could also provide new momentum for legislation intended to force additional Epstein disclosures and investigate the institutions that facilitated his activities. Garcia and Senator Elizabeth Warren have introduced legislation requiring financial regulators to investigate banks connected to Epstein and publicly disclose relevant records, potentially exposing financial executives to additional scrutiny and possible criminal referrals if evidence of wrongdoing emerges. Another proposal, the Epstein Files Transparency Act Part II, would allow survivors and state attorneys general to sue the federal government over improperly withheld or redacted Epstein documents while giving lawmakers additional mechanisms to challenge government secrecy. Separate legislation introduced by Republican Representative James Comer would help sexual abuse survivors speak publicly despite nondisclosure agreements, potentially allowing additional victims to identify people involved in Epstein's abuse. Senate Democrats, including Ron Wyden, are expected to expand investigations into Epstein's finances, although the party's projected majority of at least 54 seats would still fall short of the 60 votes generally required to advance contested legislation. Democrats also made Epstein a significant campaign issue, spending approximately $36 million on related advertisements before the election. With congressional control shifting, the central question is whether Democrats will translate their campaign promises into substantial document releases, sworn testimony, and meaningful investigations of Epstein's powerful associates. The election has given them considerably greater investigative authority, but whether that authority produces previously undisclosed evidence or legal accountability remains to be seen.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Democrats Winning Congress Means More Epstein Files—And Associates—May Now Come Out

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76193319Thu, 05 Nov 2026 17:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDemocrats' victory in the 2026 midterm elections, which delivered control of both the House and Senate, could dramatically reshape congressional investigations into Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, and the Trump administration's handling of the...
Democratic control of Congress could also provide new momentum for legislation intended to force additional Epstein disclosures and investigate the institutions that facilitated his activities. Garcia and Senator Elizabeth Warren have introduced legislation requiring financial regulators to investigate banks connected to Epstein and publicly disclose relevant records, potentially exposing financial executives to additional scrutiny and possible criminal referrals if evidence of wrongdoing emerges. Another proposal, the Epstein Files Transparency Act Part II, would allow survivors and state attorneys general to sue the federal government over improperly withheld or redacted Epstein documents while giving lawmakers additional mechanisms to challenge government secrecy. Separate legislation introduced by Republican Representative James Comer would help sexual abuse survivors speak publicly despite nondisclosure agreements, potentially allowing additional victims to identify people involved in Epstein's abuse. Senate Democrats, including Ron Wyden, are expected to expand investigations into Epstein's finances, although the party's projected majority of at least 54 seats would still fall short of the 60 votes generally required to advance contested legislation. Democrats also made Epstein a significant campaign issue, spending approximately $36 million on related advertisements before the election. With congressional control shifting, the central question is whether Democrats will translate their campaign promises into substantial document releases, sworn testimony, and meaningful investigations of Epstein's powerful associates. The election has given them considerably greater investigative authority, but whether that authority produces previously undisclosed evidence or legal accountability remains to be seen.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

fullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/maga-influencers-jeffrey-epstein-and-the-price-of-hubris-11-5-26--76179345
The collapse of that narrative exposes the arrogance and political shortsightedness of an influencer class that confused social media popularity with genuine electoral strength. By dismissing the Epstein controversy, insulting concerned Americans, and defending an administration that failed to deliver on its promises, these personalities helped undermine the credibility of the very movement they claimed to represent. Although the Epstein scandal was not the sole factor behind Republican losses, the administration's handling of the controversy provided a particularly damaging example of political hypocrisy, made worse by influencers who insisted that accountability was only necessary when their opponents held power. Their attempts to redirect responsibility after the election illustrate the same hubris that prevented them from recognizing the danger in the first place. Having tied their reputations and political fortunes so completely to Trump, they now face the consequences of their own decisions, including diminished credibility among people who once trusted them. The warnings were there, the opportunity to change course was there, and instead of listening, they doubled down on their arrogance, leaving them with nobody to blame for their own behavior but themselves.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76179345Thu, 05 Nov 2026 15:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe Republican Party's disastrous performance in the 2026 midterm elections has left a large contingent of MAGA influencers scrambling to assign blame, despite spending more than a year defending the Trump administration's handling of the Jeffrey...
The collapse of that narrative exposes the arrogance and political shortsightedness of an influencer class that confused social media popularity with genuine electoral strength. By dismissing the Epstein controversy, insulting concerned Americans, and defending an administration that failed to deliver on its promises, these personalities helped undermine the credibility of the very movement they claimed to represent. Although the Epstein scandal was not the sole factor behind Republican losses, the administration's handling of the controversy provided a particularly damaging example of political hypocrisy, made worse by influencers who insisted that accountability was only necessary when their opponents held power. Their attempts to redirect responsibility after the election illustrate the same hubris that prevented them from recognizing the danger in the first place. Having tied their reputations and political fortunes so completely to Trump, they now face the consequences of their own decisions, including diminished credibility among people who once trusted them. The warnings were there, the opportunity to change course was there, and instead of listening, they doubled down on their arrogance, leaving them with nobody to blame for their own behavior but themselves.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1024epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/todd-blanche-fights-deposition-as-epstein-survivors-seek-answers-from-the-doj-11-5-26--76179344
The Justice Department further argued that Blanche was protected by the apex doctrine, a legal principle generally shielding high-ranking government officials from compelled depositions unless extraordinary circumstances justify their testimony. Citing federal appellate decisions, prosecutors contended that forcing a sitting attorney general to testify in civil litigation would raise separation-of-powers concerns, interfere with executive responsibilities, and potentially expose senior officials to harassment or unnecessary litigation demands. The government insisted that the survivors had not demonstrated that Blanche possessed unique, indispensable information unavailable through less intrusive methods, including written interrogatories, document requests, FBI personnel, or lower-ranking government witnesses. Prosecutors also argued that the FBI policies at issue dated back decades, long before Blanche assumed his current position, further undermining the justification for compelling his appearance. The filing ultimately asked the court to cancel the deposition subpoena and issue a protective order preventing Blanche from being compelled to testify. The motion represented another legal confrontation between Epstein survivors seeking information about the federal government's handling of his crimes and a Justice Department resisting the expansion of discovery into its leadership and broader Epstein records. The filing itself was a request for judicial relief, not a ruling granting Blanche protection from testimony.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Microsoft Word - EpsteinMotiontoQuashFINAL_FPB edits.docx

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76179344Thu, 05 Nov 2026 13:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe United States Department of Justice filed a motion on October 26, 2026, in the Southern District of Florida seeking to quash a subpoena issued to Attorney General Todd Blanche in a civil lawsuit brought by Jeffrey Epstein survivors against the...
The Justice Department further argued that Blanche was protected by the apex doctrine, a legal principle generally shielding high-ranking government officials from compelled depositions unless extraordinary circumstances justify their testimony. Citing federal appellate decisions, prosecutors contended that forcing a sitting attorney general to testify in civil litigation would raise separation-of-powers concerns, interfere with executive responsibilities, and potentially expose senior officials to harassment or unnecessary litigation demands. The government insisted that the survivors had not demonstrated that Blanche possessed unique, indispensable information unavailable through less intrusive methods, including written interrogatories, document requests, FBI personnel, or lower-ranking government witnesses. Prosecutors also argued that the FBI policies at issue dated back decades, long before Blanche assumed his current position, further undermining the justification for compelling his appearance. The filing ultimately asked the court to cancel the deposition subpoena and issue a protective order preventing Blanche from being compelled to testify. The motion represented another legal confrontation between Epstein survivors seeking information about the federal government's handling of his crimes and a Justice Department resisting the expansion of discovery into its leadership and broader Epstein records. The filing itself was a request for judicial relief, not a ruling granting Blanche protection from testimony.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Microsoft Word - EpsteinMotiontoQuashFINAL_FPB edits.docx

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>853epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-donald-trump-and-his-epstein-related-battle-against-the-wsj-11-5-26--76178237
Trump's legal offensive suffered its first major defeat in April 2026, when U.S. District Judge Darrin Gayles dismissed the lawsuit after determining that the president had failed to plausibly establish actual malice, the legal standard required for a public figure to prevail in a defamation case. Although Trump was permitted to amend his complaint, his revised allegations fared no better. On October 31, 2026, Gayles dismissed the case with prejudice, preventing Trump from simply filing another version of the lawsuit. The judge criticized Trump's legal arguments as an attempt to manufacture deficiencies in the Journal's investigation and emphasized that the newspaper had contacted relevant parties, sought Trump's response, and included his denials in its reporting. Importantly, the ruling did not establish whether Trump actually created or signed the birthday letter, but instead determined that his attorneys had failed to demonstrate that the newspaper knowingly or recklessly published false information. The decision represented a significant victory for the Journal and another setback for Trump's attempts to challenge damaging Epstein-related reporting through litigation. Trump's legal representatives indicated that they intended to continue fighting the decision, potentially through an appeal, while the newspaper welcomed the dismissal. The confrontation ultimately illustrated how the Epstein scandal had expanded into a major legal and political dispute involving the president, one of America's most influential newspapers, and questions about the historical relationship between Trump and Epstein.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76178237Thu, 05 Nov 2026 11:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciThe battle between President Donald Trump and The Wall Street Journal over Jeffrey Epstein erupted in July 2025, when the newspaper published a report alleging that Trump had contributed a sexually suggestive birthday letter to a 2003 album assembled...
Trump's legal offensive suffered its first major defeat in April 2026, when U.S. District Judge Darrin Gayles dismissed the lawsuit after determining that the president had failed to plausibly establish actual malice, the legal standard required for a public figure to prevail in a defamation case. Although Trump was permitted to amend his complaint, his revised allegations fared no better. On October 31, 2026, Gayles dismissed the case with prejudice, preventing Trump from simply filing another version of the lawsuit. The judge criticized Trump's legal arguments as an attempt to manufacture deficiencies in the Journal's investigation and emphasized that the newspaper had contacted relevant parties, sought Trump's response, and included his denials in its reporting. Importantly, the ruling did not establish whether Trump actually created or signed the birthday letter, but instead determined that his attorneys had failed to demonstrate that the newspaper knowingly or recklessly published false information. The decision represented a significant victory for the Journal and another setback for Trump's attempts to challenge damaging Epstein-related reporting through litigation. Trump's legal representatives indicated that they intended to continue fighting the decision, potentially through an appeal, while the newspaper welcomed the dismissal. The confrontation ultimately illustrated how the Epstein scandal had expanded into a major legal and political dispute involving the president, one of America's most influential newspapers, and questions about the historical relationship between Trump and Epstein.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2675epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-the-billionaires-dinner-they-want-you-to-forget-11-5-26--76178235
The hypocrisy is almost unbearable. You don’t get to dine with a monster, stay silent for over a decade, and then pretend to be the loudest voice in the room demanding accountability. Musk’s selective outrage reeks of self-preservation, not justice. He wasn’t just in the same room—he was a participant in the same closed-door culture of wealth, access, and impunity that allowed Epstein to thrive. And now, as public pressure mounts, he wants to rewrite the past, cast himself as a truth-teller, and hope no one remembers where he was when it mattered. But history has receipts—and the dinner napkin still has his name on it.

Elon Musk isn’t the only one feigning moral outrage about Jeffrey Epstein while conveniently forgetting the dinner table they once shared. In 2011, at a private billionaires’ dinner during a TED conference, Musk, Jeff Bezos, Sergey Brin, and other tech titans sat shoulder to shoulder with Epstein—a man already convicted of soliciting sex from a minor. These weren’t ignorant bystanders. Epstein’s name was radioactive by then, his crimes well documented. Yet these men, who now pretend to be disgusted by the cover-up, saw no issue sharing wine and strategy with him over filet mignon and handshakes. It was a who’s who of unchecked power pretending Epstein was just another quirky financier with connections.

Fast-forward to now, and the same billionaires want to position themselves as the public’s moral compass—demanding justice, accountability, and answers from the government while playing dumb about their own proximity to the rot. Musk rails against the DOJ, Bezos hides behind silence, and the rest of them act like their invitations got lost in the mail. But this wasn’t some accident. They sat there. They talked. They mingled. And they helped normalize a predator. These men didn’t just witness the corruption—they were part of the network that allowed it to keep operating in plain sight. Now they want to shout from the rooftops as if they weren’t once whispering in the same room. That’s not courage. That’s cleanup.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


In 2011, Jeffrey Epstein Was A Known Sex Offender. Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk, And Sergey Brin Shared A Meal With Him Anyway

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76178235Thu, 05 Nov 2026 09:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciElon Musk has been loudly criticizing the DOJ and FBI over their handling of the Jeffrey Epstein investigation, calling out what he sees as a disgraceful failure to hold powerful figures accountable. He presents himself as an outsider raging against...
The hypocrisy is almost unbearable. You don’t get to dine with a monster, stay silent for over a decade, and then pretend to be the loudest voice in the room demanding accountability. Musk’s selective outrage reeks of self-preservation, not justice. He wasn’t just in the same room—he was a participant in the same closed-door culture of wealth, access, and impunity that allowed Epstein to thrive. And now, as public pressure mounts, he wants to rewrite the past, cast himself as a truth-teller, and hope no one remembers where he was when it mattered. But history has receipts—and the dinner napkin still has his name on it.

Elon Musk isn’t the only one feigning moral outrage about Jeffrey Epstein while conveniently forgetting the dinner table they once shared. In 2011, at a private billionaires’ dinner during a TED conference, Musk, Jeff Bezos, Sergey Brin, and other tech titans sat shoulder to shoulder with Epstein—a man already convicted of soliciting sex from a minor. These weren’t ignorant bystanders. Epstein’s name was radioactive by then, his crimes well documented. Yet these men, who now pretend to be disgusted by the cover-up, saw no issue sharing wine and strategy with him over filet mignon and handshakes. It was a who’s who of unchecked power pretending Epstein was just another quirky financier with connections.

Fast-forward to now, and the same billionaires want to position themselves as the public’s moral compass—demanding justice, accountability, and answers from the government while playing dumb about their own proximity to the rot. Musk rails against the DOJ, Bezos hides behind silence, and the rest of them act like their invitations got lost in the mail. But this wasn’t some accident. They sat there. They talked. They mingled. And they helped normalize a predator. These men didn’t just witness the corruption—they were part of the network that allowed it to keep operating in plain sight. Now they want to shout from the rooftops as if they weren’t once whispering in the same room. That’s not courage. That’s cleanup.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


In 2011, Jeffrey Epstein Was A Known Sex Offender. Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk, And Sergey Brin Shared A Meal With Him Anyway

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2455epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-ian-maxwell-chimes-in-on-the-andrew-virginia-settlement-11-4-26--76178236
Maxwell also attempted to undermine Giuffre's credibility by questioning the authenticity of the famous photograph showing Andrew with his arm around the then-17-year-old at Ghislaine Maxwell's London residence. He argued that Giuffre's inability to produce the original photograph could have created problems for her at trial, despite previously acknowledging that he recognized the location where the picture was taken. Maxwell further questioned the financial arrangements surrounding the settlement, suggesting that the substantial donation to Giuffre's nonprofit organization was unusual and speculating about her motivations. His remarks reflected a broader effort to portray Andrew as a victim of public pressure while casting suspicion on the woman who had accused him of sexual abuse. However, that explanation conveniently sidestepped Andrew's longstanding relationship with Epstein, his repeated attempts to discredit Giuffre, and his decision to settle before facing questioning under oath. Maxwell's suggestion that Andrew was primarily motivated by concern for his mother offered little substantive explanation for why the prince agreed to such a significant settlement after years of insisting that Giuffre's allegations were false.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76178236Thu, 05 Nov 2026 07:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciIn April 2022, Ian Maxwell, the brother of convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell, claimed that Prince Andrew had little choice but to settle Virginia Roberts Giuffre's sexual assault lawsuit because of the damage the allegations were causing to...
Maxwell also attempted to undermine Giuffre's credibility by questioning the authenticity of the famous photograph showing Andrew with his arm around the then-17-year-old at Ghislaine Maxwell's London residence. He argued that Giuffre's inability to produce the original photograph could have created problems for her at trial, despite previously acknowledging that he recognized the location where the picture was taken. Maxwell further questioned the financial arrangements surrounding the settlement, suggesting that the substantial donation to Giuffre's nonprofit organization was unusual and speculating about her motivations. His remarks reflected a broader effort to portray Andrew as a victim of public pressure while casting suspicion on the woman who had accused him of sexual abuse. However, that explanation conveniently sidestepped Andrew's longstanding relationship with Epstein, his repeated attempts to discredit Giuffre, and his decision to settle before facing questioning under oath. Maxwell's suggestion that Andrew was primarily motivated by concern for his mother offered little substantive explanation for why the prince agreed to such a significant settlement after years of insisting that Giuffre's allegations were false.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2573epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/is-this-investigation-a-search-for-truth-or-an-attempt-to-bury-the-epstein-s-files-forever-part-2--76177889
Legal scholars and government accountability watchdogs warn that labeling this sudden initiative an “ongoing investigation” could be used to halt congressional access to Epstein-related records and effectively freeze public disclosure for months or even years. Under DOJ policy, active investigations allow the government to withhold documents that would otherwise be subject to subpoenas or release mandates, raising concerns that the move could function as a procedural shield rather than a legitimate inquiry. Critics argue that invoking investigative privilege at this moment—after years of limited transparency and repeated failures to hold institutions accountable—risks undermining public trust in the justice system and may set a dangerous precedent in which politically motivated probes are used to obstruct oversight. With bipartisan pressure continuing to build around the discharge petition seeking full release of the Epstein files, the coming weeks will test whether Congress can assert its authority or whether the executive branch can successfully deploy legal mechanisms to re-seal evidence and control the narrative around one of the most consequential criminal scandals in modern American history.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76177889Thu, 05 Nov 2026 05:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciThe controversy surrounding the Epstein files has intensified following President Trump’s public directive calling on Attorney General Pam Bondi and the Department of Justice to launch a new investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s...
Legal scholars and government accountability watchdogs warn that labeling this sudden initiative an “ongoing investigation” could be used to halt congressional access to Epstein-related records and effectively freeze public disclosure for months or even years. Under DOJ policy, active investigations allow the government to withhold documents that would otherwise be subject to subpoenas or release mandates, raising concerns that the move could function as a procedural shield rather than a legitimate inquiry. Critics argue that invoking investigative privilege at this moment—after years of limited transparency and repeated failures to hold institutions accountable—risks undermining public trust in the justice system and may set a dangerous precedent in which politically motivated probes are used to obstruct oversight. With bipartisan pressure continuing to build around the discharge petition seeking full release of the Epstein files, the coming weeks will test whether Congress can assert its authority or whether the executive branch can successfully deploy legal mechanisms to re-seal evidence and control the narrative around one of the most consequential criminal scandals in modern American history.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1344epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/is-this-investigation-a-search-for-truth-or-an-attempt-to-bury-the-epstein-s-files-forever-part-1--76177891
Legal scholars and government accountability watchdogs warn that labeling this sudden initiative an “ongoing investigation” could be used to halt congressional access to Epstein-related records and effectively freeze public disclosure for months or even years. Under DOJ policy, active investigations allow the government to withhold documents that would otherwise be subject to subpoenas or release mandates, raising concerns that the move could function as a procedural shield rather than a legitimate inquiry. Critics argue that invoking investigative privilege at this moment—after years of limited transparency and repeated failures to hold institutions accountable—risks undermining public trust in the justice system and may set a dangerous precedent in which politically motivated probes are used to obstruct oversight. With bipartisan pressure continuing to build around the discharge petition seeking full release of the Epstein files, the coming weeks will test whether Congress can assert its authority or whether the executive branch can successfully deploy legal mechanisms to re-seal evidence and control the narrative around one of the most consequential criminal scandals in modern American history.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76177891Thu, 05 Nov 2026 03:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciThe controversy surrounding the Epstein files has intensified following President Trump’s public directive calling on Attorney General Pam Bondi and the Department of Justice to launch a new investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s...
Legal scholars and government accountability watchdogs warn that labeling this sudden initiative an “ongoing investigation” could be used to halt congressional access to Epstein-related records and effectively freeze public disclosure for months or even years. Under DOJ policy, active investigations allow the government to withhold documents that would otherwise be subject to subpoenas or release mandates, raising concerns that the move could function as a procedural shield rather than a legitimate inquiry. Critics argue that invoking investigative privilege at this moment—after years of limited transparency and repeated failures to hold institutions accountable—risks undermining public trust in the justice system and may set a dangerous precedent in which politically motivated probes are used to obstruct oversight. With bipartisan pressure continuing to build around the discharge petition seeking full release of the Epstein files, the coming weeks will test whether Congress can assert its authority or whether the executive branch can successfully deploy legal mechanisms to re-seal evidence and control the narrative around one of the most consequential criminal scandals in modern American history.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>992epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-day-6-part-14-11-3-26--76143307
The defense concentrated much of its closing argument on the aggravating circumstance that could keep the aggravated-murder charge death-penalty eligible: whether the shooter knowingly created a great risk of death to someone other than Kirk. Attorney Staci Visser stressed that there had been one shot, one bullet and one person struck, arguing that prosecutors were stretching possible dangers—such as a miss, ricochet or pass-through bullet—into proof that another person had actually been placed within the legally required “zone of danger.” Richard Novak separately challenged the state’s evidence concerning political motivation and whether Robinson could reasonably have known children were present. Prosecutor Chad Grunander answered that argument by describing the shot as “ballistic roulette,” emphasizing that Kirk was surrounded by security personnel, a questioner and thousands of spectators and arguing that a slight error in aim could easily have killed someone else. The fundamental dispute at closing was therefore not simply whether the state could identify Robinson as the alleged shooter, but whether prosecutors had established the aggravating circumstances and enhancements necessary to carry the entire case—including its potential death penalty—forward to trial.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76143307Thu, 05 Nov 2026 01:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciDay six of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing, held September 1, 2026, centered on closing arguments and the prosecution’s claim that the evidence easily cleared Utah’s probable-cause standard. Deputy Utah County Attorney Ryan McBride argued that...
The defense concentrated much of its closing argument on the aggravating circumstance that could keep the aggravated-murder charge death-penalty eligible: whether the shooter knowingly created a great risk of death to someone other than Kirk. Attorney Staci Visser stressed that there had been one shot, one bullet and one person struck, arguing that prosecutors were stretching possible dangers—such as a miss, ricochet or pass-through bullet—into proof that another person had actually been placed within the legally required “zone of danger.” Richard Novak separately challenged the state’s evidence concerning political motivation and whether Robinson could reasonably have known children were present. Prosecutor Chad Grunander answered that argument by describing the shot as “ballistic roulette,” emphasizing that Kirk was surrounded by security personnel, a questioner and thousands of spectators and arguing that a slight error in aim could easily have killed someone else. The fundamental dispute at closing was therefore not simply whether the state could identify Robinson as the alleged shooter, but whether prosecutors had established the aggravating circumstances and enhancements necessary to carry the entire case—including its potential death penalty—forward to trial.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>685breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-us-department-of-justice-motion-to-dismiss-the-epstein-survivor-lawsuit-part-2-11-4-26--76143303
The government's filing also challenged the survivors' argument that the FBI assumed a legal responsibility to protect them after receiving information about Epstein's activities. Federal attorneys rejected comparisons to litigation arising from the 2018 Marjory Stoneman Douglas school shooting, where the FBI's failure to properly forward a warning had supported negligence claims. The DOJ argued that the circumstances were fundamentally different because individuals reporting Epstein's conduct had communicated directly with FBI agents, who retained discretion over whether to pursue additional investigative steps. Prosecutors further contended that the survivors had failed to demonstrate that the FBI created a foreseeable danger or that its conduct established the necessary legal connection to their subsequent abuse. The filing also raised a separate procedural objection involving three plaintiffs, identified as Jane Does 13, 21, and 29, arguing that their administrative claims failed to specify the monetary damages being sought, a requirement the government maintained was necessary for the court to exercise jurisdiction. The DOJ insisted that it could raise this jurisdictional objection even though it had not presented the argument in earlier dismissal motions. Ultimately, the government asked the court to dismiss the entire lawsuit without allowing further amendments, arguing that repeated revisions had failed to correct the complaint's fundamental legal deficiencies. The filing represented another effort by federal authorities to defeat a lawsuit seeking to hold the government financially accountable for its handling of warnings about Epstein, with the DOJ arguing that investigative discretion, statutory deadlines, and procedural requirements prevented the survivors from pursuing their claims.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

gov.uscourts.flsd.693362.117.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76143303Wed, 04 Nov 2026 23:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe United States Department of Justice filed an eleven-page reply on June 25, 2026, in the Southern District of Florida, urging federal Judge David Leibowitz to dismiss a lawsuit brought by 34 Jeffrey Epstein survivors who accused the FBI of failing...
The government's filing also challenged the survivors' argument that the FBI assumed a legal responsibility to protect them after receiving information about Epstein's activities. Federal attorneys rejected comparisons to litigation arising from the 2018 Marjory Stoneman Douglas school shooting, where the FBI's failure to properly forward a warning had supported negligence claims. The DOJ argued that the circumstances were fundamentally different because individuals reporting Epstein's conduct had communicated directly with FBI agents, who retained discretion over whether to pursue additional investigative steps. Prosecutors further contended that the survivors had failed to demonstrate that the FBI created a foreseeable danger or that its conduct established the necessary legal connection to their subsequent abuse. The filing also raised a separate procedural objection involving three plaintiffs, identified as Jane Does 13, 21, and 29, arguing that their administrative claims failed to specify the monetary damages being sought, a requirement the government maintained was necessary for the court to exercise jurisdiction. The DOJ insisted that it could raise this jurisdictional objection even though it had not presented the argument in earlier dismissal motions. Ultimately, the government asked the court to dismiss the entire lawsuit without allowing further amendments, arguing that repeated revisions had failed to correct the complaint's fundamental legal deficiencies. The filing represented another effort by federal authorities to defeat a lawsuit seeking to hold the government financially accountable for its handling of warnings about Epstein, with the DOJ arguing that investigative discretion, statutory deadlines, and procedural requirements prevented the survivors from pursuing their claims.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

gov.uscourts.flsd.693362.117.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: 699epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-us-department-of-justice-motion-to-dismiss-the-epstein-survivor-lawsuit-part-1-11-4-26--76143308
The government's filing also challenged the survivors' argument that the FBI assumed a legal responsibility to protect them after receiving information about Epstein's activities. Federal attorneys rejected comparisons to litigation arising from the 2018 Marjory Stoneman Douglas school shooting, where the FBI's failure to properly forward a warning had supported negligence claims. The DOJ argued that the circumstances were fundamentally different because individuals reporting Epstein's conduct had communicated directly with FBI agents, who retained discretion over whether to pursue additional investigative steps. Prosecutors further contended that the survivors had failed to demonstrate that the FBI created a foreseeable danger or that its conduct established the necessary legal connection to their subsequent abuse. The filing also raised a separate procedural objection involving three plaintiffs, identified as Jane Does 13, 21, and 29, arguing that their administrative claims failed to specify the monetary damages being sought, a requirement the government maintained was necessary for the court to exercise jurisdiction. The DOJ insisted that it could raise this jurisdictional objection even though it had not presented the argument in earlier dismissal motions. Ultimately, the government asked the court to dismiss the entire lawsuit without allowing further amendments, arguing that repeated revisions had failed to correct the complaint's fundamental legal deficiencies. The filing represented another effort by federal authorities to defeat a lawsuit seeking to hold the government financially accountable for its handling of warnings about Epstein, with the DOJ arguing that investigative discretion, statutory deadlines, and procedural requirements prevented the survivors from pursuing their claims.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

gov.uscourts.flsd.693362.117.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76143308Wed, 04 Nov 2026 21:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciThe United States Department of Justice filed an eleven-page reply on June 25, 2026, in the Southern District of Florida, urging federal Judge David Leibowitz to dismiss a lawsuit brought by 34 Jeffrey Epstein survivors who accused the FBI of failing...
The government's filing also challenged the survivors' argument that the FBI assumed a legal responsibility to protect them after receiving information about Epstein's activities. Federal attorneys rejected comparisons to litigation arising from the 2018 Marjory Stoneman Douglas school shooting, where the FBI's failure to properly forward a warning had supported negligence claims. The DOJ argued that the circumstances were fundamentally different because individuals reporting Epstein's conduct had communicated directly with FBI agents, who retained discretion over whether to pursue additional investigative steps. Prosecutors further contended that the survivors had failed to demonstrate that the FBI created a foreseeable danger or that its conduct established the necessary legal connection to their subsequent abuse. The filing also raised a separate procedural objection involving three plaintiffs, identified as Jane Does 13, 21, and 29, arguing that their administrative claims failed to specify the monetary damages being sought, a requirement the government maintained was necessary for the court to exercise jurisdiction. The DOJ insisted that it could raise this jurisdictional objection even though it had not presented the argument in earlier dismissal motions. Ultimately, the government asked the court to dismiss the entire lawsuit without allowing further amendments, arguing that repeated revisions had failed to correct the complaint's fundamental legal deficiencies. The filing represented another effort by federal authorities to defeat a lawsuit seeking to hold the government financially accountable for its handling of warnings about Epstein, with the DOJ arguing that investigative discretion, statutory deadlines, and procedural requirements prevented the survivors from pursuing their claims.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

gov.uscourts.flsd.693362.117.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: 796epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/trump-told-americans-to-move-on-from-epstein-instead-the-voters-moved-on-from-the-gop-11-4-26--76177738
The Republican Party's electoral defeat also fundamentally altered the political landscape surrounding the Epstein investigation, placing congressional oversight in Democratic hands and opening the possibility of more aggressive subpoenas, hearings, and investigations into the government's handling of the case. The results exposed the contradiction between the GOP's years of demanding accountability from political opponents and its unwillingness to apply those same standards to its own administration. Trump, meanwhile, attempted to distance himself from the losses despite having made Republican candidates defend his policies and controversies throughout the campaign. Although the Epstein scandal cannot independently explain the election results, it became a symbol of the administration's contempt for public scrutiny and its failure to honor promises made to voters. With Republicans losing control of Congress, Democrats now face pressure to turn their transparency promises into meaningful investigations rather than another round of partisan theater. For Epstein's survivors and the Americans who have demanded answers for years, the election represented an opportunity for renewed accountability, while leaving the Republican Party confronting the political consequences of defending an administration that repeatedly treated legitimate demands for transparency as an inconvenience rather than an obligation.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76177738Wed, 04 Nov 2026 19:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe 2026 midterm elections delivered a devastating political defeat to Donald Trump and the Republican Party, with Democrats capturing both chambers of Congress and scoring victories in traditionally Republican states, including Texas, Kansas, Iowa,...
The Republican Party's electoral defeat also fundamentally altered the political landscape surrounding the Epstein investigation, placing congressional oversight in Democratic hands and opening the possibility of more aggressive subpoenas, hearings, and investigations into the government's handling of the case. The results exposed the contradiction between the GOP's years of demanding accountability from political opponents and its unwillingness to apply those same standards to its own administration. Trump, meanwhile, attempted to distance himself from the losses despite having made Republican candidates defend his policies and controversies throughout the campaign. Although the Epstein scandal cannot independently explain the election results, it became a symbol of the administration's contempt for public scrutiny and its failure to honor promises made to voters. With Republicans losing control of Congress, Democrats now face pressure to turn their transparency promises into meaningful investigations rather than another round of partisan theater. For Epstein's survivors and the Americans who have demanded answers for years, the election represented an opportunity for renewed accountability, while leaving the Republican Party confronting the political consequences of defending an administration that repeatedly treated legitimate demands for transparency as an inconvenience rather than an obligation.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1251epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/maria-farmer-sues-the-federal-government-over-its-handling-of-jeffrey-epstein-part-2-11-4-26--76158879
The complaint also detailed Farmer's unsuccessful attempts to obtain accountability from the government after decades of alleged intimidation, emotional trauma, and institutional indifference. Farmer accused Epstein and Maxwell of threatening her safety, destroying her career prospects, and forcing her to repeatedly relocate out of fear of retaliation. She also alleged that federal authorities misled victims about the status of their investigations, failed to enforce even the limited restrictions imposed by Epstein's Florida plea arrangement, and concealed information that could have exposed misconduct within the Justice Department. After requesting FBI records concerning her 1996 and 2006 complaints, Farmer was informed that her Freedom of Information Act request might not be completed until November 2027. She also contacted the DOJ's Inspector General in 2023, but the department subsequently closed her complaint without initiating an internal affairs investigation. Filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act, the lawsuit asserted negligence and negligent or intentional infliction of emotional distress, seeking monetary damages and other relief for the government's alleged failures. Farmer maintained that the FBI and DOJ had numerous opportunities to intervene against Epstein but repeatedly failed to fulfill their responsibilities, allowing his criminal activities to continue while victims suffered the consequences. The filing represented a direct attempt to hold the federal government financially and legally accountable for its historical handling of Epstein, with Farmer arguing that the catastrophe was not simply the result of investigative mistakes but a prolonged failure to enforce laws specifically designed to protect children from sexual exploitation. These were allegations presented in Farmer's complaint, not findings that the government had been held liable.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.281128.1.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76158879Wed, 04 Nov 2026 17:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciOn May 29, 2025, Jeffrey Epstein survivor Maria Farmer filed a 63-page federal lawsuit against the United States government, accusing the FBI, Department of Justice, and federal prosecutors of decades of negligence that allowed Epstein and Ghislaine...
The complaint also detailed Farmer's unsuccessful attempts to obtain accountability from the government after decades of alleged intimidation, emotional trauma, and institutional indifference. Farmer accused Epstein and Maxwell of threatening her safety, destroying her career prospects, and forcing her to repeatedly relocate out of fear of retaliation. She also alleged that federal authorities misled victims about the status of their investigations, failed to enforce even the limited restrictions imposed by Epstein's Florida plea arrangement, and concealed information that could have exposed misconduct within the Justice Department. After requesting FBI records concerning her 1996 and 2006 complaints, Farmer was informed that her Freedom of Information Act request might not be completed until November 2027. She also contacted the DOJ's Inspector General in 2023, but the department subsequently closed her complaint without initiating an internal affairs investigation. Filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act, the lawsuit asserted negligence and negligent or intentional infliction of emotional distress, seeking monetary damages and other relief for the government's alleged failures. Farmer maintained that the FBI and DOJ had numerous opportunities to intervene against Epstein but repeatedly failed to fulfill their responsibilities, allowing his criminal activities to continue while victims suffered the consequences. The filing represented a direct attempt to hold the federal government financially and legally accountable for its historical handling of Epstein, with Farmer arguing that the catastrophe was not simply the result of investigative mistakes but a prolonged failure to enforce laws specifically designed to protect children from sexual exploitation. These were allegations presented in Farmer's complaint, not findings that the government had been held liable.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.281128.1.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: 830epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/maria-farmer-sues-the-federal-government-over-its-handling-of-jeffrey-epstein-part-1-11-4-26--76158881
The complaint also detailed Farmer's unsuccessful attempts to obtain accountability from the government after decades of alleged intimidation, emotional trauma, and institutional indifference. Farmer accused Epstein and Maxwell of threatening her safety, destroying her career prospects, and forcing her to repeatedly relocate out of fear of retaliation. She also alleged that federal authorities misled victims about the status of their investigations, failed to enforce even the limited restrictions imposed by Epstein's Florida plea arrangement, and concealed information that could have exposed misconduct within the Justice Department. After requesting FBI records concerning her 1996 and 2006 complaints, Farmer was informed that her Freedom of Information Act request might not be completed until November 2027. She also contacted the DOJ's Inspector General in 2023, but the department subsequently closed her complaint without initiating an internal affairs investigation. Filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act, the lawsuit asserted negligence and negligent or intentional infliction of emotional distress, seeking monetary damages and other relief for the government's alleged failures. Farmer maintained that the FBI and DOJ had numerous opportunities to intervene against Epstein but repeatedly failed to fulfill their responsibilities, allowing his criminal activities to continue while victims suffered the consequences. The filing represented a direct attempt to hold the federal government financially and legally accountable for its historical handling of Epstein, with Farmer arguing that the catastrophe was not simply the result of investigative mistakes but a prolonged failure to enforce laws specifically designed to protect children from sexual exploitation. These were allegations presented in Farmer's complaint, not findings that the government had been held liable.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.281128.1.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76158881Wed, 04 Nov 2026 15:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciOn May 29, 2025, Jeffrey Epstein survivor Maria Farmer filed a 63-page federal lawsuit against the United States government, accusing the FBI, Department of Justice, and federal prosecutors of decades of negligence that allowed Epstein and Ghislaine...
The complaint also detailed Farmer's unsuccessful attempts to obtain accountability from the government after decades of alleged intimidation, emotional trauma, and institutional indifference. Farmer accused Epstein and Maxwell of threatening her safety, destroying her career prospects, and forcing her to repeatedly relocate out of fear of retaliation. She also alleged that federal authorities misled victims about the status of their investigations, failed to enforce even the limited restrictions imposed by Epstein's Florida plea arrangement, and concealed information that could have exposed misconduct within the Justice Department. After requesting FBI records concerning her 1996 and 2006 complaints, Farmer was informed that her Freedom of Information Act request might not be completed until November 2027. She also contacted the DOJ's Inspector General in 2023, but the department subsequently closed her complaint without initiating an internal affairs investigation. Filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act, the lawsuit asserted negligence and negligent or intentional infliction of emotional distress, seeking monetary damages and other relief for the government's alleged failures. Farmer maintained that the FBI and DOJ had numerous opportunities to intervene against Epstein but repeatedly failed to fulfill their responsibilities, allowing his criminal activities to continue while victims suffered the consequences. The filing represented a direct attempt to hold the federal government financially and legally accountable for its historical handling of Epstein, with Farmer arguing that the catastrophe was not simply the result of investigative mistakes but a prolonged failure to enforce laws specifically designed to protect children from sexual exploitation. These were allegations presented in Farmer's complaint, not findings that the government had been held liable.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.281128.1.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: 722epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/prince-andrew-and-king-charles-face-renewed-tensions-over-the-epstein-scandal-11-4-26--76159045
The controversy has also generated allegations that Andrew could attempt to pressure his brother by threatening to reveal damaging information about the royal family unless he receives assistance with his legal troubles. Unnamed insiders and royal commentators have speculated that Andrew possesses sensitive knowledge about Charles and other family members, although no evidence of an actual blackmail attempt has been presented. Sources further claimed that Charles prohibited Andrew from using money previously provided by the king to finance his legal battle, raising questions about how the disgraced former prince intends to pay his mounting legal expenses. Royal commentator Hilary Fordwich criticized Andrew's decision to challenge the investigation, arguing that his actions were further humiliating the monarchy and worsening his already precarious position. The latest confrontation underscores the increasingly difficult position facing Buckingham Palace as Andrew continues resisting the legal and reputational consequences of his Epstein connections. Rather than quietly accepting his removal from royal life, Andrew appears determined to fight the investigation, potentially prolonging a scandal that has already inflicted significant damage on the monarchy's credibility. The claims about threatened disclosures, financial pressure, and internal royal tensions remain attributed to unnamed sources rather than independently established facts.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Andrew Windsor's Legal Battle 'Stirs Renewed Royal Family Tensions'

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76159045Wed, 04 Nov 2026 13:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciAndrew Mountbatten-Windsor has reportedly launched a legal challenge against his arrest in connection with the ongoing investigation into his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, creating another controversy for the British royal family and escalating...
The controversy has also generated allegations that Andrew could attempt to pressure his brother by threatening to reveal damaging information about the royal family unless he receives assistance with his legal troubles. Unnamed insiders and royal commentators have speculated that Andrew possesses sensitive knowledge about Charles and other family members, although no evidence of an actual blackmail attempt has been presented. Sources further claimed that Charles prohibited Andrew from using money previously provided by the king to finance his legal battle, raising questions about how the disgraced former prince intends to pay his mounting legal expenses. Royal commentator Hilary Fordwich criticized Andrew's decision to challenge the investigation, arguing that his actions were further humiliating the monarchy and worsening his already precarious position. The latest confrontation underscores the increasingly difficult position facing Buckingham Palace as Andrew continues resisting the legal and reputational consequences of his Epstein connections. Rather than quietly accepting his removal from royal life, Andrew appears determined to fight the investigation, potentially prolonging a scandal that has already inflicted significant damage on the monarchy's credibility. The claims about threatened disclosures, financial pressure, and internal royal tensions remain attributed to unnamed sources rather than independently established facts.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Andrew Windsor's Legal Battle 'Stirs Renewed Royal Family Tensions'

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>630epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jes-staley-and-the-transcripts-from-his-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-8-10-11-4-26--76157665
The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein’s cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley’s professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.


to contact me:


bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76157665Wed, 04 Nov 2026 11:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe transcripts from Jes Staley’s July 24, 2026 interview with the House Oversight Committee revealed just how deep and personal his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein became, while also exposing contradictions in the way Staley had described that...
The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein’s cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley’s professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.


to contact me:


bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2442epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jes-staley-and-the-transcripts-from-his-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-5-7-11-4-26--76157666
The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein’s cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley’s professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.


to contact me:


bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76157666Wed, 04 Nov 2026 09:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe transcripts from Jes Staley’s July 24, 2026 interview with the House Oversight Committee revealed just how deep and personal his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein became, while also exposing contradictions in the way Staley had described that...
The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein’s cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley’s professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.


to contact me:


bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2934epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jes-staley-and-the-transcripts-from-his-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-1-3-11-2-26--76157664
The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein’s cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley’s professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.


to contact me:


bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76157664Wed, 04 Nov 2026 07:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe transcripts from Jes Staley’s July 24, 2026 interview with the House Oversight Committee revealed just how deep and personal his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein became, while also exposing contradictions in the way Staley had described that...
The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein’s cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley’s professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.


to contact me:


bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2727epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-search-for-debanhi-escobar-comes-to-a-grim-conclusion--76157688
The investigation into Escobar's death became increasingly controversial as conflicting autopsy findings, questionable investigative procedures, and allegations of official negligence undermined public confidence in the authorities. Although the initial forensic examination attributed her death to a severe head injury, a subsequent examination following the exhumation of her body concluded that she had died from asphyxiation caused by obstruction of her nose and mouth, ruling out drowning and finding no forensic evidence supporting sexual assault. Investigators also determined that she had died approximately three to five days before her body was discovered, raising additional questions about what happened during the period between her disappearance and death. Her parents, Mario Escobar and Dolores Bazaldúa, repeatedly challenged the handling of the investigation and demanded that authorities determine who was responsible. Mexican officials eventually classified the case as a suspected femicide, while the discovery that investigators had previously searched the motel without finding her body fueled allegations of incompetence and possible misconduct. Escobar's death prompted widespread demonstrations across Mexico, where thousands of women demanded accountability for the epidemic of disappearances, sexual violence, and murders affecting women and girls. The haunting photograph of her standing alone on the highway became a national symbol of that crisis, while the unanswered questions surrounding her final days continued to trouble her family. Despite extensive public attention and multiple forensic examinations, the circumstances of her death remained unresolved in the reporting reviewed, with no perpetrator conclusively identified.

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76157688Wed, 04 Nov 2026 05:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciThe disappearance and death of 18-year-old Debanhi Escobar in April 2022 sparked national outrage in Mexico, exposing serious concerns about violence against women, investigative failures, and the country's ongoing femicide crisis. On April 8, Escobar...
The investigation into Escobar's death became increasingly controversial as conflicting autopsy findings, questionable investigative procedures, and allegations of official negligence undermined public confidence in the authorities. Although the initial forensic examination attributed her death to a severe head injury, a subsequent examination following the exhumation of her body concluded that she had died from asphyxiation caused by obstruction of her nose and mouth, ruling out drowning and finding no forensic evidence supporting sexual assault. Investigators also determined that she had died approximately three to five days before her body was discovered, raising additional questions about what happened during the period between her disappearance and death. Her parents, Mario Escobar and Dolores Bazaldúa, repeatedly challenged the handling of the investigation and demanded that authorities determine who was responsible. Mexican officials eventually classified the case as a suspected femicide, while the discovery that investigators had previously searched the motel without finding her body fueled allegations of incompetence and possible misconduct. Escobar's death prompted widespread demonstrations across Mexico, where thousands of women demanded accountability for the epidemic of disappearances, sexual violence, and murders affecting women and girls. The haunting photograph of her standing alone on the highway became a national symbol of that crisis, while the unanswered questions surrounding her final days continued to trouble her family. Despite extensive public attention and multiple forensic examinations, the circumstances of her death remained unresolved in the reporting reviewed, with no perpetrator conclusively identified.

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1036breakingnews,coldcase,coldcases,disappeared,missing,missingpeople,missingpersons,news,newsupdate,talesofthemissing,thosewhohavevanished,truecrime,truecrimeaddict,truecrimecommunity,truecrimejunkie,truecrimeobsessed,truecrimepodcast,unsolvedmysteries,unsolvedmystery,vanishedtruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-disappearance-of-debanhi-escobar--76157687
The investigation into Escobar's death became increasingly controversial as conflicting autopsy findings, questionable investigative procedures, and allegations of official negligence undermined public confidence in the authorities. Although the initial forensic examination attributed her death to a severe head injury, a subsequent examination following the exhumation of her body concluded that she had died from asphyxiation caused by obstruction of her nose and mouth, ruling out drowning and finding no forensic evidence supporting sexual assault. Investigators also determined that she had died approximately three to five days before her body was discovered, raising additional questions about what happened during the period between her disappearance and death. Her parents, Mario Escobar and Dolores Bazaldúa, repeatedly challenged the handling of the investigation and demanded that authorities determine who was responsible. Mexican officials eventually classified the case as a suspected femicide, while the discovery that investigators had previously searched the motel without finding her body fueled allegations of incompetence and possible misconduct. Escobar's death prompted widespread demonstrations across Mexico, where thousands of women demanded accountability for the epidemic of disappearances, sexual violence, and murders affecting women and girls. The haunting photograph of her standing alone on the highway became a national symbol of that crisis, while the unanswered questions surrounding her final days continued to trouble her family. Despite extensive public attention and multiple forensic examinations, the circumstances of her death remained unresolved in the reporting reviewed, with no perpetrator conclusively identified.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76157687Wed, 04 Nov 2026 03:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe disappearance and death of 18-year-old Debanhi Escobar in April 2022 sparked national outrage in Mexico, exposing serious concerns about violence against women, investigative failures, and the country's ongoing femicide crisis. On April 8, Escobar...
The investigation into Escobar's death became increasingly controversial as conflicting autopsy findings, questionable investigative procedures, and allegations of official negligence undermined public confidence in the authorities. Although the initial forensic examination attributed her death to a severe head injury, a subsequent examination following the exhumation of her body concluded that she had died from asphyxiation caused by obstruction of her nose and mouth, ruling out drowning and finding no forensic evidence supporting sexual assault. Investigators also determined that she had died approximately three to five days before her body was discovered, raising additional questions about what happened during the period between her disappearance and death. Her parents, Mario Escobar and Dolores Bazaldúa, repeatedly challenged the handling of the investigation and demanded that authorities determine who was responsible. Mexican officials eventually classified the case as a suspected femicide, while the discovery that investigators had previously searched the motel without finding her body fueled allegations of incompetence and possible misconduct. Escobar's death prompted widespread demonstrations across Mexico, where thousands of women demanded accountability for the epidemic of disappearances, sexual violence, and murders affecting women and girls. The haunting photograph of her standing alone on the highway became a national symbol of that crisis, while the unanswered questions surrounding her final days continued to trouble her family. Despite extensive public attention and multiple forensic examinations, the circumstances of her death remained unresolved in the reporting reviewed, with no perpetrator conclusively identified.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>721breakingnews,coldcase,coldcases,disappeared,missing,missingpeople,missingpersons,news,newsupdate,talesofthemissing,thosewhohavevanished,truecrime,truecrimeaddict,truecrimecommunity,truecrimejunkie,truecrimeobsessed,truecrimepodcast,unsolvedmysteries,unsolvedmystery,vanishedtruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-day-6-part-13-11-3-26--76143309
The defense concentrated much of its closing argument on the aggravating circumstance that could keep the aggravated-murder charge death-penalty eligible: whether the shooter knowingly created a great risk of death to someone other than Kirk. Attorney Staci Visser stressed that there had been one shot, one bullet and one person struck, arguing that prosecutors were stretching possible dangers—such as a miss, ricochet or pass-through bullet—into proof that another person had actually been placed within the legally required “zone of danger.” Richard Novak separately challenged the state’s evidence concerning political motivation and whether Robinson could reasonably have known children were present. Prosecutor Chad Grunander answered that argument by describing the shot as “ballistic roulette,” emphasizing that Kirk was surrounded by security personnel, a questioner and thousands of spectators and arguing that a slight error in aim could easily have killed someone else. The fundamental dispute at closing was therefore not simply whether the state could identify Robinson as the alleged shooter, but whether prosecutors had established the aggravating circumstances and enhancements necessary to carry the entire case—including its potential death penalty—forward to trial.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76143309Wed, 04 Nov 2026 01:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay six of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing, held September 1, 2026, centered on closing arguments and the prosecution’s claim that the evidence easily cleared Utah’s probable-cause standard. Deputy Utah County Attorney Ryan McBride argued that...
The defense concentrated much of its closing argument on the aggravating circumstance that could keep the aggravated-murder charge death-penalty eligible: whether the shooter knowingly created a great risk of death to someone other than Kirk. Attorney Staci Visser stressed that there had been one shot, one bullet and one person struck, arguing that prosecutors were stretching possible dangers—such as a miss, ricochet or pass-through bullet—into proof that another person had actually been placed within the legally required “zone of danger.” Richard Novak separately challenged the state’s evidence concerning political motivation and whether Robinson could reasonably have known children were present. Prosecutor Chad Grunander answered that argument by describing the shot as “ballistic roulette,” emphasizing that Kirk was surrounded by security personnel, a questioner and thousands of spectators and arguing that a slight error in aim could easily have killed someone else. The fundamental dispute at closing was therefore not simply whether the state could identify Robinson as the alleged shooter, but whether prosecutors had established the aggravating circumstances and enhancements necessary to carry the entire case—including its potential death penalty—forward to trial.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>645breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-usvi-and-their-motion-to-exclude-jp-morgan-s-expert-witnesses-part-4-11-3-26--76118383
The memorandum also challenged the proposed testimony of retired FBI agent Joseph Fonseca, who sought to minimize the importance of financial records and suspicious activity reports in investigations involving sex trafficking. The USVI emphasized that Fonseca admitted during his deposition that he had never used suspicious activity reports during his FBI career and had not even understood what they were before JPMorgan hired him for the litigation. According to the filing, his limited familiarity with banking documentation made him unqualified to speculate about whether financial information supplied by JPMorgan could have assisted investigators pursuing Epstein. The government similarly attacked forensic economist Carlyn Irwin's proposed testimony concerning tax benefits awarded to Epstein's businesses through the Virgin Islands Economic Development Commission. Irwin had criticized the territory's oversight of those benefits and suggested that their approval could have involved an improper exchange between Epstein and government officials. However, the USVI argued that she lacked experience with territorial tax programs, had not conducted an independent fraud investigation, and possessed no evidentiary foundation for suggesting improper motives by public officials. The government maintained that JPMorgan was attempting to redirect responsibility toward Virgin Islands authorities while introducing speculative testimony that did not address the bank's alleged participation in and financial benefit from Epstein's trafficking operation. Citing Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and the standards established in Daubert, the USVI asked Judge Jed Rakoff to exclude the three experts' opinions entirely or substantially restrict their testimony before trial.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76118383Tue, 03 Nov 2026 23:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciOn August 18, 2023, the government of the United States Virgin Islands filed a memorandum in the Southern District of New York seeking to exclude expert testimony presented by JPMorgan Chase in the civil lawsuit concerning the bank's financial...
The memorandum also challenged the proposed testimony of retired FBI agent Joseph Fonseca, who sought to minimize the importance of financial records and suspicious activity reports in investigations involving sex trafficking. The USVI emphasized that Fonseca admitted during his deposition that he had never used suspicious activity reports during his FBI career and had not even understood what they were before JPMorgan hired him for the litigation. According to the filing, his limited familiarity with banking documentation made him unqualified to speculate about whether financial information supplied by JPMorgan could have assisted investigators pursuing Epstein. The government similarly attacked forensic economist Carlyn Irwin's proposed testimony concerning tax benefits awarded to Epstein's businesses through the Virgin Islands Economic Development Commission. Irwin had criticized the territory's oversight of those benefits and suggested that their approval could have involved an improper exchange between Epstein and government officials. However, the USVI argued that she lacked experience with territorial tax programs, had not conducted an independent fraud investigation, and possessed no evidentiary foundation for suggesting improper motives by public officials. The government maintained that JPMorgan was attempting to redirect responsibility toward Virgin Islands authorities while introducing speculative testimony that did not address the bank's alleged participation in and financial benefit from Epstein's trafficking operation. Citing Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and the standards established in Daubert, the USVI asked Judge Jed Rakoff to exclude the three experts' opinions entirely or substantially restrict their testimony before trial.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>815epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-usvi-and-their-motion-to-exclude-jp-morgan-s-expert-witnesses-part-3-11-3-26--76118382
The memorandum also challenged the proposed testimony of retired FBI agent Joseph Fonseca, who sought to minimize the importance of financial records and suspicious activity reports in investigations involving sex trafficking. The USVI emphasized that Fonseca admitted during his deposition that he had never used suspicious activity reports during his FBI career and had not even understood what they were before JPMorgan hired him for the litigation. According to the filing, his limited familiarity with banking documentation made him unqualified to speculate about whether financial information supplied by JPMorgan could have assisted investigators pursuing Epstein. The government similarly attacked forensic economist Carlyn Irwin's proposed testimony concerning tax benefits awarded to Epstein's businesses through the Virgin Islands Economic Development Commission. Irwin had criticized the territory's oversight of those benefits and suggested that their approval could have involved an improper exchange between Epstein and government officials. However, the USVI argued that she lacked experience with territorial tax programs, had not conducted an independent fraud investigation, and possessed no evidentiary foundation for suggesting improper motives by public officials. The government maintained that JPMorgan was attempting to redirect responsibility toward Virgin Islands authorities while introducing speculative testimony that did not address the bank's alleged participation in and financial benefit from Epstein's trafficking operation. Citing Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and the standards established in Daubert, the USVI asked Judge Jed Rakoff to exclude the three experts' opinions entirely or substantially restrict their testimony before trial.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76118382Tue, 03 Nov 2026 21:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciOn August 18, 2023, the government of the United States Virgin Islands filed a memorandum in the Southern District of New York seeking to exclude expert testimony presented by JPMorgan Chase in the civil lawsuit concerning the bank's financial...
The memorandum also challenged the proposed testimony of retired FBI agent Joseph Fonseca, who sought to minimize the importance of financial records and suspicious activity reports in investigations involving sex trafficking. The USVI emphasized that Fonseca admitted during his deposition that he had never used suspicious activity reports during his FBI career and had not even understood what they were before JPMorgan hired him for the litigation. According to the filing, his limited familiarity with banking documentation made him unqualified to speculate about whether financial information supplied by JPMorgan could have assisted investigators pursuing Epstein. The government similarly attacked forensic economist Carlyn Irwin's proposed testimony concerning tax benefits awarded to Epstein's businesses through the Virgin Islands Economic Development Commission. Irwin had criticized the territory's oversight of those benefits and suggested that their approval could have involved an improper exchange between Epstein and government officials. However, the USVI argued that she lacked experience with territorial tax programs, had not conducted an independent fraud investigation, and possessed no evidentiary foundation for suggesting improper motives by public officials. The government maintained that JPMorgan was attempting to redirect responsibility toward Virgin Islands authorities while introducing speculative testimony that did not address the bank's alleged participation in and financial benefit from Epstein's trafficking operation. Citing Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and the standards established in Daubert, the USVI asked Judge Jed Rakoff to exclude the three experts' opinions entirely or substantially restrict their testimony before trial.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>740epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-epstein-effect-how-trump-s-handling-of-the-files-became-a-midterm-election-liability-11-4-26--76158884
With control of Congress at stake, the Epstein controversy added another layer of uncertainty to an election already dominated by economic concerns, dissatisfaction with Washington, and questions about the administration’s performance. Democratic candidates sought to capitalize on the backlash, while Republicans faced the possibility that frustrated conservatives, independents, and former Trump supporters could stay home or vote against the party. Even relatively small shifts in turnout could prove consequential in competitive congressional races, particularly if voters viewed the administration’s conduct as evidence of broader dishonesty and political arrogance. A Democratic takeover of the House could also fundamentally change the direction of congressional oversight, potentially opening the door to more aggressive subpoenas, document demands, and investigations into Epstein’s associates and the government institutions that failed to stop him. However, Democrats would face their own accountability test if they gained power after campaigning on transparency and justice for survivors. Ultimately, the controversy illustrated how an administration that promised to expose corruption instead created a political liability through its own decisions, leaving Trump and the Republican Party facing an electorate with an opportunity to deliver consequences at the ballot box.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76158884Tue, 03 Nov 2026 19:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciAs Americans headed to the polls for the 2026 midterm elections, the Trump administration faced the potential political consequences of its handling of the Jeffrey Epstein scandal, an issue that had become a significant source of frustration among...
With control of Congress at stake, the Epstein controversy added another layer of uncertainty to an election already dominated by economic concerns, dissatisfaction with Washington, and questions about the administration’s performance. Democratic candidates sought to capitalize on the backlash, while Republicans faced the possibility that frustrated conservatives, independents, and former Trump supporters could stay home or vote against the party. Even relatively small shifts in turnout could prove consequential in competitive congressional races, particularly if voters viewed the administration’s conduct as evidence of broader dishonesty and political arrogance. A Democratic takeover of the House could also fundamentally change the direction of congressional oversight, potentially opening the door to more aggressive subpoenas, document demands, and investigations into Epstein’s associates and the government institutions that failed to stop him. However, Democrats would face their own accountability test if they gained power after campaigning on transparency and justice for survivors. Ultimately, the controversy illustrated how an administration that promised to expose corruption instead created a political liability through its own decisions, leaving Trump and the Republican Party facing an electorate with an opportunity to deliver consequences at the ballot box.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1034epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/doj-rejects-calls-for-special-counsel-in-jeffrey-epstein-investigation-11-3-26--76143305
The refusal to embrace an independent investigation is particularly controversial because the department has already faced accusations of withholding evidence from state and foreign authorities pursuing their own Epstein-related investigations. Raskin has demanded explanations for the DOJ's reported refusal to cooperate with investigators in New Mexico and several European countries, while congressional Democrats have accused federal officials of shutting down investigative leads and prematurely declaring that no additional prosecutions were warranted. Blanche has insisted that the department remains willing to investigate credible new evidence, but that assurance has done little to satisfy critics who question why the same officials responsible for the disputed handling of the Epstein files should retain exclusive control over determining what warrants further examination. Appointing a special counsel would not automatically establish criminal wrongdoing, but it could provide a degree of investigative independence that the department's current approach has failed to inspire. Instead, the administration's resistance has left the DOJ in the uncomfortable position of effectively asking the public to trust its own assessment of allegations involving its leadership and the president it serves. For Epstein survivors and lawmakers demanding accountability, the continued absence of an independent investigation reinforces concerns that potentially important evidence will remain unexamined and that decisions about further prosecutions will continue to be made behind closed doors.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76143305Tue, 03 Nov 2026 17:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciThe Department of Justice has brushed aside growing demands for an independent special counsel to investigate Jeffrey Epstein's associates, potential co-conspirators, and the federal government's handling of the case, despite mounting criticism of its...
The refusal to embrace an independent investigation is particularly controversial because the department has already faced accusations of withholding evidence from state and foreign authorities pursuing their own Epstein-related investigations. Raskin has demanded explanations for the DOJ's reported refusal to cooperate with investigators in New Mexico and several European countries, while congressional Democrats have accused federal officials of shutting down investigative leads and prematurely declaring that no additional prosecutions were warranted. Blanche has insisted that the department remains willing to investigate credible new evidence, but that assurance has done little to satisfy critics who question why the same officials responsible for the disputed handling of the Epstein files should retain exclusive control over determining what warrants further examination. Appointing a special counsel would not automatically establish criminal wrongdoing, but it could provide a degree of investigative independence that the department's current approach has failed to inspire. Instead, the administration's resistance has left the DOJ in the uncomfortable position of effectively asking the public to trust its own assessment of allegations involving its leadership and the president it serves. For Epstein survivors and lawmakers demanding accountability, the continued absence of an independent investigation reinforces concerns that potentially important evidence will remain unexamined and that decisions about further prosecutions will continue to be made behind closed doors.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1019epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/donald-trump-s-legal-offensive-against-epstein-reporting-falls-apart-11-3-26--76143304
The ruling also rejected Trump's argument that The Wall Street Journal should have abandoned its reporting after he personally denied writing the letter. Judge Gayles emphasized that allowing public officials to prevent unfavorable stories simply by disputing their accuracy would violate fundamental First Amendment protections. The court found that the newspaper had conducted a substantial investigation, contacted relevant individuals, sought Trump's response, and included his denials in its published account. Importantly, the judge did not determine whether Trump actually wrote or signed the disputed letter, focusing instead on whether his lawsuit satisfied the legal requirements for defamation. Because the case was dismissed with prejudice, Trump cannot submit another amended complaint in the district court, although his legal team announced plans to appeal. The decision represented a significant victory for the Journal and Murdoch, particularly because Trump had reportedly contacted Murdoch before publication in an unsuccessful attempt to stop the story. The ruling also came amid Trump's broader legal confrontations with major news organizations, including a separate $10 billion lawsuit against the BBC in which a federal judge recently ordered him to sit for a deposition. For Trump, the decision marked another unsuccessful attempt to use defamation litigation to challenge damaging reporting concerning his historical relationship with Epstein, while leaving the authenticity of the controversial birthday letter unresolved.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76143304Tue, 03 Nov 2026 15:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciPresident Donald Trump's $10 billion defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal, Rupert Murdoch, and other defendants was dismissed with prejudice on October 31, 2026, delivering another major legal setback in his battle over the newspaper's...
The ruling also rejected Trump's argument that The Wall Street Journal should have abandoned its reporting after he personally denied writing the letter. Judge Gayles emphasized that allowing public officials to prevent unfavorable stories simply by disputing their accuracy would violate fundamental First Amendment protections. The court found that the newspaper had conducted a substantial investigation, contacted relevant individuals, sought Trump's response, and included his denials in its published account. Importantly, the judge did not determine whether Trump actually wrote or signed the disputed letter, focusing instead on whether his lawsuit satisfied the legal requirements for defamation. Because the case was dismissed with prejudice, Trump cannot submit another amended complaint in the district court, although his legal team announced plans to appeal. The decision represented a significant victory for the Journal and Murdoch, particularly because Trump had reportedly contacted Murdoch before publication in an unsuccessful attempt to stop the story. The ruling also came amid Trump's broader legal confrontations with major news organizations, including a separate $10 billion lawsuit against the BBC in which a federal judge recently ordered him to sit for a deposition. For Trump, the decision marked another unsuccessful attempt to use defamation litigation to challenge damaging reporting concerning his historical relationship with Epstein, while leaving the authenticity of the controversial birthday letter unresolved.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>707epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/epstein-s-traveling-massage-therapist-draws-scrutiny-in-balmoral-investigation-11-3-26--76143306
The investigation represents another serious development in the expanding scrutiny surrounding Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and his longstanding relationship with Epstein. Police Scotland confirmed that officers had received new information and were conducting active inquiries, although authorities emphasized that the investigation remained in its earliest stages. Investigators are examining the circumstances surrounding Epstein and Maxwell's visits to Balmoral, including a 1999 stay and a 2006 private flight that carried Andrew and Maxwell to Edinburgh. Correspondence believed to involve Andrew also included a 2001 message from Balmoral asking Maxwell whether she had found him any new inappropriate friends, adding another troubling element to the historical record. At least nine British police forces are currently investigating or reviewing Epstein-related allegations, while Andrew remains under investigation following his February 2026 arrest on suspicion of misconduct in public office over allegations that he shared sensitive government information with Epstein. Andrew has denied wrongdoing, and Scottish authorities have not established that trafficking occurred at Balmoral. Nevertheless, the latest disclosures raise serious questions about how Epstein and Maxwell gained access to royal properties, who accompanied them during those visits, and whether their activities received the scrutiny they warranted at the time.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Police probe into 'travelling massage therapist Epstein flew to Balmoral on his jet' for visit with Andrew | Daily Mail Online

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76143306Tue, 03 Nov 2026 13:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciPolice Scotland is investigating allegations that Jeffrey Epstein trafficked young women to Balmoral Castle, including a traveling massage therapist who reportedly visited the royal estate on multiple occasions. According to newly uncovered FBI...
The investigation represents another serious development in the expanding scrutiny surrounding Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and his longstanding relationship with Epstein. Police Scotland confirmed that officers had received new information and were conducting active inquiries, although authorities emphasized that the investigation remained in its earliest stages. Investigators are examining the circumstances surrounding Epstein and Maxwell's visits to Balmoral, including a 1999 stay and a 2006 private flight that carried Andrew and Maxwell to Edinburgh. Correspondence believed to involve Andrew also included a 2001 message from Balmoral asking Maxwell whether she had found him any new inappropriate friends, adding another troubling element to the historical record. At least nine British police forces are currently investigating or reviewing Epstein-related allegations, while Andrew remains under investigation following his February 2026 arrest on suspicion of misconduct in public office over allegations that he shared sensitive government information with Epstein. Andrew has denied wrongdoing, and Scottish authorities have not established that trafficking occurred at Balmoral. Nevertheless, the latest disclosures raise serious questions about how Epstein and Maxwell gained access to royal properties, who accompanied them during those visits, and whether their activities received the scrutiny they warranted at the time.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Police probe into 'travelling massage therapist Epstein flew to Balmoral on his jet' for visit with Andrew | Daily Mail Online

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>636epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-fears-over-contamination-grow-in-e-palestine-after-the-train-derailment-11-3-26--76139337

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76139337Tue, 03 Nov 2026 11:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe fears surrounding the derailment were almost immediate, with residents expressing concerns about contaminated water, polluted soil, and potentially dangerous chemicals lingering in the air long after the fires were extinguished. Reports of dead...

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2830breakingnews,buzzfeedunsolvedtruecrime,news,truecrime,truecrimeaddict,truecrimeallthetime,truecrimeandchill,truecrimebooks,truecrimecommunity,truecrimefan,truecrimegarage,truecrimejunkie,truecrimeobsessed,truecrimepodcast,truecrimepodcasts,truecrimereport,truecrimes,truecrimestoriestruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-e-palestine-ohio-train-derailment-11-3-26--76139338

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76139338Tue, 03 Nov 2026 09:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciOn February 3, 2023, a Norfolk Southern freight train carrying hazardous chemicals derailed in East Palestine, Ohio, triggering a massive fire and immediate fears of an environmental catastrophe. Thirty-eight railcars derailed, several carrying...

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3192breakingnews,buzzfeedunsolvedtruecrime,news,truecrime,truecrimeaddict,truecrimeallthetime,truecrimeandchill,truecrimebooks,truecrimecommunity,truecrimefan,truecrimegarage,truecrimejunkie,truecrimeobsessed,truecrimepodcast,truecrimepodcasts,truecrimereport,truecrimes,truecrimestoriestruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-human-trafficking-and-the-city-of-sin-11-3-26--76139336
The trafficking problem in Las Vegas has also exposed the difficulties law enforcement faces when attempting to distinguish consensual adult sex work from criminal exploitation involving force, fraud, coercion, or minors. Despite Nevada's reputation for legalized prostitution, commercial sex remains illegal in Clark County, including Las Vegas, while traffickers have continued exploiting the city's association with the sex industry to conceal their activities. Victims are frequently controlled through intimidation, financial dependence, drug addiction, emotional manipulation, and threats against family members, making it extremely difficult for investigators to identify those being exploited or persuade them to cooperate with criminal prosecutions. Federal and local authorities have established specialized task forces involving the FBI, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Homeland Security Investigations, and victim advocacy organizations to identify trafficking operations and recover victims. A Southern Nevada trafficking task force grant application reported that local law enforcement had identified 539 sex and labor trafficking victims over a three-year period, demonstrating the substantial investigative workload confronting authorities. The problem extends beyond sexual exploitation, with labor trafficking also affecting individuals forced to work under abusive or coercive conditions. Researchers at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, have warned that trafficking statistics likely underestimate the true scope of the problem because many victims never contact authorities and numerous cases remain undetected. The combination of a massive tourism economy, vulnerable populations, interstate transportation networks, and the ability of traffickers to operate behind legitimate businesses has made Las Vegas an enduring focal point in the national fight against human trafficking.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76139336Tue, 03 Nov 2026 07:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciLas Vegas has long been identified by federal investigators and anti-trafficking organizations as a significant hub for human trafficking, particularly the sexual exploitation of women and underage girls. The city's enormous tourism industry,...
The trafficking problem in Las Vegas has also exposed the difficulties law enforcement faces when attempting to distinguish consensual adult sex work from criminal exploitation involving force, fraud, coercion, or minors. Despite Nevada's reputation for legalized prostitution, commercial sex remains illegal in Clark County, including Las Vegas, while traffickers have continued exploiting the city's association with the sex industry to conceal their activities. Victims are frequently controlled through intimidation, financial dependence, drug addiction, emotional manipulation, and threats against family members, making it extremely difficult for investigators to identify those being exploited or persuade them to cooperate with criminal prosecutions. Federal and local authorities have established specialized task forces involving the FBI, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Homeland Security Investigations, and victim advocacy organizations to identify trafficking operations and recover victims. A Southern Nevada trafficking task force grant application reported that local law enforcement had identified 539 sex and labor trafficking victims over a three-year period, demonstrating the substantial investigative workload confronting authorities. The problem extends beyond sexual exploitation, with labor trafficking also affecting individuals forced to work under abusive or coercive conditions. Researchers at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, have warned that trafficking statistics likely underestimate the true scope of the problem because many victims never contact authorities and numerous cases remain undetected. The combination of a massive tourism economy, vulnerable populations, interstate transportation networks, and the ability of traffickers to operate behind legitimate businesses has made Las Vegas an enduring focal point in the national fight against human trafficking.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>5630breakingnews,buzzfeedunsolvedtruecrime,news,truecrime,truecrimeaddict,truecrimeallthetime,truecrimeandchill,truecrimebooks,truecrimecommunity,truecrimefan,truecrimegarage,truecrimejunkie,truecrimeobsessed,truecrimepodcast,truecrimepodcasts,truecrimereport,truecrimes,truecrimestoriestruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/madeleine-mccann-and-the-search-for-answers-in-algarve--76138426
The renewed search focused heavily on a secluded peninsula extending into the reservoir, where investigators erected forensic tents and began examining the terrain for evidence potentially connected to Madeleine's disappearance. German authorities believed Brueckner, who had lived in the Algarve during the period surrounding Madeleine's disappearance, might have used the isolated location to conceal evidence of a crime. Police searched wooded areas, examined disturbed ground, and investigated sections of the reservoir while maintaining tight security around the operation. The location had previously attracted attention in 2008, when a private search funded by a Portuguese lawyer failed to uncover evidence explaining Madeleine's disappearance. German prosecutors maintained that they believed Madeleine was dead and that Brueckner was responsible, although he denied involvement and had not been charged in connection with her disappearance. The three-day operation concluded on May 25, with Portuguese authorities confirming that material recovered during the search would be forwarded to Germany for forensic examination. Investigators did not publicly announce the discovery of Madeleine's remains or any conclusive evidence connecting Brueckner to her disappearance. Despite the absence of an immediate breakthrough, the excavation demonstrated that investigators were continuing to pursue leads in one of the world's most extensively publicized missing-child investigations, sixteen years after Madeleine vanished.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76138426Tue, 03 Nov 2026 05:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn May 2023, German and Portuguese investigators launched a major search of the Barragem do Arade reservoir in Portugal's Algarve region as part of the investigation into the disappearance of Madeleine McCann, who vanished from a holiday apartment in...
The renewed search focused heavily on a secluded peninsula extending into the reservoir, where investigators erected forensic tents and began examining the terrain for evidence potentially connected to Madeleine's disappearance. German authorities believed Brueckner, who had lived in the Algarve during the period surrounding Madeleine's disappearance, might have used the isolated location to conceal evidence of a crime. Police searched wooded areas, examined disturbed ground, and investigated sections of the reservoir while maintaining tight security around the operation. The location had previously attracted attention in 2008, when a private search funded by a Portuguese lawyer failed to uncover evidence explaining Madeleine's disappearance. German prosecutors maintained that they believed Madeleine was dead and that Brueckner was responsible, although he denied involvement and had not been charged in connection with her disappearance. The three-day operation concluded on May 25, with Portuguese authorities confirming that material recovered during the search would be forwarded to Germany for forensic examination. Investigators did not publicly announce the discovery of Madeleine's remains or any conclusive evidence connecting Brueckner to her disappearance. Despite the absence of an immediate breakthrough, the excavation demonstrated that investigators were continuing to pursue leads in one of the world's most extensively publicized missing-child investigations, sixteen years after Madeleine vanished.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1537breakingnews,coldcase,coldcases,disappeared,missing,missingpeople,missingpersons,news,newsupdate,talesofthemissing,thosewhohavevanished,truecrime,truecrimeaddict,truecrimecommunity,truecrimejunkie,truecrimeobsessed,truecrimepodcast,unsolvedmysteries,unsolvedmystery,vanishedtruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-depraved-nature-of-rex-heuermann-s-google-search-history--76138425
Heuermann's search history also revealed an obsessive interest in the investigation into his own murders, including repeated searches concerning the Gilgo Beach victims, their families, police activity, and the forensic techniques authorities might use to identify the killer. Investigators discovered searches about cellphone tracking, historical cell-site analysis, DNA technology, forensic genealogy, and developments in the Gilgo Beach investigation, along with questions about why the Long Island serial killer had not been caught. Prosecutors also identified searches for software capable of deleting electronic evidence and concealing online activity, suggesting efforts to understand and potentially circumvent investigative techniques. In March 2026, prosecutors disclosed that Heuermann had contacted at least 60 sex workers more than 500 times during the years preceding his arrest, while maintaining numerous burner phones and online accounts under false identities. His digital activity painted a particularly chilling picture of a man who maintained the outward appearance of an ordinary suburban architect while privately consuming extreme violent material, monitoring investigators, and continuing to seek contact with vulnerable women. On April 8, 2026, Heuermann pleaded guilty to murdering seven women and admitted responsibility for an eighth killing, confirming that the man behind this disturbing digital record had spent years committing the very kinds of violence that appeared to fascinate him. His internet history became one of the most revealing aspects of the investigation, exposing not merely an interest in violent material but a sustained pattern of sexual sadism, apparent preoccupation with his victims, and concern over whether law enforcement was closing in on him.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76138425Tue, 03 Nov 2026 03:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciThe internet search history recovered from Rex Heuermann's electronic devices exposed a deeply disturbing obsession with sexual violence, torture, murder, and the suffering of women, providing investigators with extraordinary insight into the mind of...
Heuermann's search history also revealed an obsessive interest in the investigation into his own murders, including repeated searches concerning the Gilgo Beach victims, their families, police activity, and the forensic techniques authorities might use to identify the killer. Investigators discovered searches about cellphone tracking, historical cell-site analysis, DNA technology, forensic genealogy, and developments in the Gilgo Beach investigation, along with questions about why the Long Island serial killer had not been caught. Prosecutors also identified searches for software capable of deleting electronic evidence and concealing online activity, suggesting efforts to understand and potentially circumvent investigative techniques. In March 2026, prosecutors disclosed that Heuermann had contacted at least 60 sex workers more than 500 times during the years preceding his arrest, while maintaining numerous burner phones and online accounts under false identities. His digital activity painted a particularly chilling picture of a man who maintained the outward appearance of an ordinary suburban architect while privately consuming extreme violent material, monitoring investigators, and continuing to seek contact with vulnerable women. On April 8, 2026, Heuermann pleaded guilty to murdering seven women and admitted responsibility for an eighth killing, confirming that the man behind this disturbing digital record had spent years committing the very kinds of violence that appeared to fascinate him. His internet history became one of the most revealing aspects of the investigation, exposing not merely an interest in violent material but a sustained pattern of sexual sadism, apparent preoccupation with his victims, and concern over whether law enforcement was closing in on him.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>899epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-day-6-part-12-11-2-26--76121189
The defense concentrated much of its closing argument on the aggravating circumstance that could keep the aggravated-murder charge death-penalty eligible: whether the shooter knowingly created a great risk of death to someone other than Kirk. Attorney Staci Visser stressed that there had been one shot, one bullet and one person struck, arguing that prosecutors were stretching possible dangers—such as a miss, ricochet or pass-through bullet—into proof that another person had actually been placed within the legally required “zone of danger.” Richard Novak separately challenged the state’s evidence concerning political motivation and whether Robinson could reasonably have known children were present. Prosecutor Chad Grunander answered that argument by describing the shot as “ballistic roulette,” emphasizing that Kirk was surrounded by security personnel, a questioner and thousands of spectators and arguing that a slight error in aim could easily have killed someone else. The fundamental dispute at closing was therefore not simply whether the state could identify Robinson as the alleged shooter, but whether prosecutors had established the aggravating circumstances and enhancements necessary to carry the entire case—including its potential death penalty—forward to trial.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76121189Tue, 03 Nov 2026 01:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay six of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing, held September 1, 2026, centered on closing arguments and the prosecution’s claim that the evidence easily cleared Utah’s probable-cause standard. Deputy Utah County Attorney Ryan McBride argued that...
The defense concentrated much of its closing argument on the aggravating circumstance that could keep the aggravated-murder charge death-penalty eligible: whether the shooter knowingly created a great risk of death to someone other than Kirk. Attorney Staci Visser stressed that there had been one shot, one bullet and one person struck, arguing that prosecutors were stretching possible dangers—such as a miss, ricochet or pass-through bullet—into proof that another person had actually been placed within the legally required “zone of danger.” Richard Novak separately challenged the state’s evidence concerning political motivation and whether Robinson could reasonably have known children were present. Prosecutor Chad Grunander answered that argument by describing the shot as “ballistic roulette,” emphasizing that Kirk was surrounded by security personnel, a questioner and thousands of spectators and arguing that a slight error in aim could easily have killed someone else. The fundamental dispute at closing was therefore not simply whether the state could identify Robinson as the alleged shooter, but whether prosecutors had established the aggravating circumstances and enhancements necessary to carry the entire case—including its potential death penalty—forward to trial.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>684breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-usvi-and-their-motion-to-exclude-jp-morgan-s-expert-witnesses-part-2-11-2-26--76118381
The memorandum also challenged the proposed testimony of retired FBI agent Joseph Fonseca, who sought to minimize the importance of financial records and suspicious activity reports in investigations involving sex trafficking. The USVI emphasized that Fonseca admitted during his deposition that he had never used suspicious activity reports during his FBI career and had not even understood what they were before JPMorgan hired him for the litigation. According to the filing, his limited familiarity with banking documentation made him unqualified to speculate about whether financial information supplied by JPMorgan could have assisted investigators pursuing Epstein. The government similarly attacked forensic economist Carlyn Irwin's proposed testimony concerning tax benefits awarded to Epstein's businesses through the Virgin Islands Economic Development Commission. Irwin had criticized the territory's oversight of those benefits and suggested that their approval could have involved an improper exchange between Epstein and government officials. However, the USVI argued that she lacked experience with territorial tax programs, had not conducted an independent fraud investigation, and possessed no evidentiary foundation for suggesting improper motives by public officials. The government maintained that JPMorgan was attempting to redirect responsibility toward Virgin Islands authorities while introducing speculative testimony that did not address the bank's alleged participation in and financial benefit from Epstein's trafficking operation. Citing Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and the standards established in Daubert, the USVI asked Judge Jed Rakoff to exclude the three experts' opinions entirely or substantially restrict their testimony before trial.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76118381Mon, 02 Nov 2026 23:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciOn August 18, 2023, the government of the United States Virgin Islands filed a memorandum in the Southern District of New York seeking to exclude expert testimony presented by JPMorgan Chase in the civil lawsuit concerning the bank's financial...
The memorandum also challenged the proposed testimony of retired FBI agent Joseph Fonseca, who sought to minimize the importance of financial records and suspicious activity reports in investigations involving sex trafficking. The USVI emphasized that Fonseca admitted during his deposition that he had never used suspicious activity reports during his FBI career and had not even understood what they were before JPMorgan hired him for the litigation. According to the filing, his limited familiarity with banking documentation made him unqualified to speculate about whether financial information supplied by JPMorgan could have assisted investigators pursuing Epstein. The government similarly attacked forensic economist Carlyn Irwin's proposed testimony concerning tax benefits awarded to Epstein's businesses through the Virgin Islands Economic Development Commission. Irwin had criticized the territory's oversight of those benefits and suggested that their approval could have involved an improper exchange between Epstein and government officials. However, the USVI argued that she lacked experience with territorial tax programs, had not conducted an independent fraud investigation, and possessed no evidentiary foundation for suggesting improper motives by public officials. The government maintained that JPMorgan was attempting to redirect responsibility toward Virgin Islands authorities while introducing speculative testimony that did not address the bank's alleged participation in and financial benefit from Epstein's trafficking operation. Citing Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and the standards established in Daubert, the USVI asked Judge Jed Rakoff to exclude the three experts' opinions entirely or substantially restrict their testimony before trial.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>634epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-usvi-and-their-motion-to-exclude-jp-morgan-s-expert-witnesses-part-1-11-2-26--76118379
The memorandum also challenged the proposed testimony of retired FBI agent Joseph Fonseca, who sought to minimize the importance of financial records and suspicious activity reports in investigations involving sex trafficking. The USVI emphasized that Fonseca admitted during his deposition that he had never used suspicious activity reports during his FBI career and had not even understood what they were before JPMorgan hired him for the litigation. According to the filing, his limited familiarity with banking documentation made him unqualified to speculate about whether financial information supplied by JPMorgan could have assisted investigators pursuing Epstein. The government similarly attacked forensic economist Carlyn Irwin's proposed testimony concerning tax benefits awarded to Epstein's businesses through the Virgin Islands Economic Development Commission. Irwin had criticized the territory's oversight of those benefits and suggested that their approval could have involved an improper exchange between Epstein and government officials. However, the USVI argued that she lacked experience with territorial tax programs, had not conducted an independent fraud investigation, and possessed no evidentiary foundation for suggesting improper motives by public officials. The government maintained that JPMorgan was attempting to redirect responsibility toward Virgin Islands authorities while introducing speculative testimony that did not address the bank's alleged participation in and financial benefit from Epstein's trafficking operation. Citing Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and the standards established in Daubert, the USVI asked Judge Jed Rakoff to exclude the three experts' opinions entirely or substantially restrict their testimony before trial.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76118379Mon, 02 Nov 2026 21:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciOn August 18, 2023, the government of the United States Virgin Islands filed a memorandum in the Southern District of New York seeking to exclude expert testimony presented by JPMorgan Chase in the civil lawsuit concerning the bank's financial...
The memorandum also challenged the proposed testimony of retired FBI agent Joseph Fonseca, who sought to minimize the importance of financial records and suspicious activity reports in investigations involving sex trafficking. The USVI emphasized that Fonseca admitted during his deposition that he had never used suspicious activity reports during his FBI career and had not even understood what they were before JPMorgan hired him for the litigation. According to the filing, his limited familiarity with banking documentation made him unqualified to speculate about whether financial information supplied by JPMorgan could have assisted investigators pursuing Epstein. The government similarly attacked forensic economist Carlyn Irwin's proposed testimony concerning tax benefits awarded to Epstein's businesses through the Virgin Islands Economic Development Commission. Irwin had criticized the territory's oversight of those benefits and suggested that their approval could have involved an improper exchange between Epstein and government officials. However, the USVI argued that she lacked experience with territorial tax programs, had not conducted an independent fraud investigation, and possessed no evidentiary foundation for suggesting improper motives by public officials. The government maintained that JPMorgan was attempting to redirect responsibility toward Virgin Islands authorities while introducing speculative testimony that did not address the bank's alleged participation in and financial benefit from Epstein's trafficking operation. Citing Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and the standards established in Daubert, the USVI asked Judge Jed Rakoff to exclude the three experts' opinions entirely or substantially restrict their testimony before trial.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>836epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/donald-trump-s-wsj-lawsuit-is-dismissed-with-prejudice-part-3-11-2-26--76118380
However, Judge Gayles rejected those arguments, determining that Trump had failed to establish a plausible claim of actual malice, the legal standard requiring public figures to demonstrate that allegedly defamatory statements were published with knowledge of their falsity or reckless disregard for the truth. The judge emphasized that journalists are not legally required to abandon a story simply because a powerful public figure denies its accuracy, particularly when the publication includes those denials and provides readers with the opportunity to evaluate the competing accounts. Because Trump had already been given an opportunity to amend his original complaint and had again failed to meet the required legal standard, Gayles dismissed the lawsuit with prejudice, preventing Trump from simply filing another amended version of the same claims.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.flsd.693830.80.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76118380Mon, 02 Nov 2026 19:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciOn October 31, 2026, U.S. District Judge Darrin Gayles dismissed President Donald Trump's defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal, Dow Jones, News Corp., Rupert Murdoch, and two journalists over the newspaper's reporting about a sexually...
However, Judge Gayles rejected those arguments, determining that Trump had failed to establish a plausible claim of actual malice, the legal standard requiring public figures to demonstrate that allegedly defamatory statements were published with knowledge of their falsity or reckless disregard for the truth. The judge emphasized that journalists are not legally required to abandon a story simply because a powerful public figure denies its accuracy, particularly when the publication includes those denials and provides readers with the opportunity to evaluate the competing accounts. Because Trump had already been given an opportunity to amend his original complaint and had again failed to meet the required legal standard, Gayles dismissed the lawsuit with prejudice, preventing Trump from simply filing another amended version of the same claims.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.flsd.693830.80.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>791epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/donald-trump-s-wsj-lawsuit-is-dismissed-with-prejudice-part-2-11-2-26--76118384
However, Judge Gayles rejected those arguments, determining that Trump had failed to establish a plausible claim of actual malice, the legal standard requiring public figures to demonstrate that allegedly defamatory statements were published with knowledge of their falsity or reckless disregard for the truth. The judge emphasized that journalists are not legally required to abandon a story simply because a powerful public figure denies its accuracy, particularly when the publication includes those denials and provides readers with the opportunity to evaluate the competing accounts. Because Trump had already been given an opportunity to amend his original complaint and had again failed to meet the required legal standard, Gayles dismissed the lawsuit with prejudice, preventing Trump from simply filing another amended version of the same claims.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.flsd.693830.80.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76118384Mon, 02 Nov 2026 17:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciOn October 31, 2026, U.S. District Judge Darrin Gayles dismissed President Donald Trump's defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal, Dow Jones, News Corp., Rupert Murdoch, and two journalists over the newspaper's reporting about a sexually...
However, Judge Gayles rejected those arguments, determining that Trump had failed to establish a plausible claim of actual malice, the legal standard requiring public figures to demonstrate that allegedly defamatory statements were published with knowledge of their falsity or reckless disregard for the truth. The judge emphasized that journalists are not legally required to abandon a story simply because a powerful public figure denies its accuracy, particularly when the publication includes those denials and provides readers with the opportunity to evaluate the competing accounts. Because Trump had already been given an opportunity to amend his original complaint and had again failed to meet the required legal standard, Gayles dismissed the lawsuit with prejudice, preventing Trump from simply filing another amended version of the same claims.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.flsd.693830.80.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>689epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/donald-trump-s-wsj-lawsuit-is-dismissed-with-prejudice-part-1-11-2-26--76118378
However, Judge Gayles rejected those arguments, determining that Trump had failed to establish a plausible claim of actual malice, the legal standard requiring public figures to demonstrate that allegedly defamatory statements were published with knowledge of their falsity or reckless disregard for the truth. The judge emphasized that journalists are not legally required to abandon a story simply because a powerful public figure denies its accuracy, particularly when the publication includes those denials and provides readers with the opportunity to evaluate the competing accounts. Because Trump had already been given an opportunity to amend his original complaint and had again failed to meet the required legal standard, Gayles dismissed the lawsuit with prejudice, preventing Trump from simply filing another amended version of the same claims.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.flsd.693830.80.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76118378Mon, 02 Nov 2026 15:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciOn October 31, 2026, U.S. District Judge Darrin Gayles dismissed President Donald Trump's defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal, Dow Jones, News Corp., Rupert Murdoch, and two journalists over the newspaper's reporting about a sexually...
However, Judge Gayles rejected those arguments, determining that Trump had failed to establish a plausible claim of actual malice, the legal standard requiring public figures to demonstrate that allegedly defamatory statements were published with knowledge of their falsity or reckless disregard for the truth. The judge emphasized that journalists are not legally required to abandon a story simply because a powerful public figure denies its accuracy, particularly when the publication includes those denials and provides readers with the opportunity to evaluate the competing accounts. Because Trump had already been given an opportunity to amend his original complaint and had again failed to meet the required legal standard, Gayles dismissed the lawsuit with prejudice, preventing Trump from simply filing another amended version of the same claims.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.flsd.693830.80.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>693epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-epstein-estate-s-opposition-to-the-usvi-intervening-in-probate-proceedings-11-2-26--76118728



Jeffrey Epstein's estate, represented by co-executors Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, filed a memorandum opposing the United States Virgin Islands government's attempt to intervene in the probate proceedings overseeing Epstein's assets. The February 3, 2020, filing came after Virgin Islands Attorney General Denise George initiated a civil enforcement action accusing Epstein of operating an extensive sex trafficking enterprise within the territory. The government sought to intervene to protect its financial claims, enforce criminal activity liens, and ensure that Epstein's considerable estate was administered properly. It also raised concerns about potential conflicts of interest involving Indyke and Kahn, who had longstanding professional and financial relationships with Epstein and involvement in various business entities connected to him. The estate rejected those concerns, arguing that the executors' previous relationships with Epstein did not automatically disqualify them from administering his assets. Its attorneys maintained that there was no evidence either executor had violated his fiduciary duties or improperly managed estate property. The filing also challenged the government's justification for intervention, arguing that the Superior Court already possessed the authority to supervise estate administration. Furthermore, the estate accused the government of creating an artificial emergency by waiting more than five months after the probate proceedings began before attempting to intervene.

The estate's principal legal argument centered on the Virgin Islands government's alleged failure to follow the mandatory procedures governing claims against a deceased person's estate. According to the memorandum, the government improperly relied on Rule 24 of the Virgin Islands Rules of Civil Procedure rather than the specific probate statutes established under Title 15 of the Virgin Islands Code. Those provisions required creditors to submit verified claims directly to the estate's executors, who would then review and either approve or reject them before further legal proceedings could commence. Instead, the government filed a separate civil action against the estate on January 15, 2020, and subsequently attempted to enter the probate proceedings without completing that process. The estate argued that allowing such intervention would undermine established probate rules and potentially give the government an unfair advantage over other creditors seeking compensation from Epstein's assets. Its attorneys further maintained that even if Rule 24 applied, the government's interest remained contingent on successfully pursuing its separate lawsuit, making that interest insufficient to justify intervention. The memorandum ultimately asked the Superior Court to deny the government's motion and require it to pursue its claims through the established probate process. The dispute reflected a broader struggle over control of Epstein's remaining fortune, with Virgin Islands authorities attempting to secure greater oversight of assets connected to their sex trafficking allegations while Indyke and Kahn sought to preserve their authority over the estate and its proposed compensation program.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76118728Mon, 02 Nov 2026 13:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJeffrey Epstein's estate, represented by co-executors Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, filed a memorandum opposing the United States Virgin Islands government's attempt to intervene in the probate proceedings overseeing Epstein's assets. The February...



Jeffrey Epstein's estate, represented by co-executors Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, filed a memorandum opposing the United States Virgin Islands government's attempt to intervene in the probate proceedings overseeing Epstein's assets. The February 3, 2020, filing came after Virgin Islands Attorney General Denise George initiated a civil enforcement action accusing Epstein of operating an extensive sex trafficking enterprise within the territory. The government sought to intervene to protect its financial claims, enforce criminal activity liens, and ensure that Epstein's considerable estate was administered properly. It also raised concerns about potential conflicts of interest involving Indyke and Kahn, who had longstanding professional and financial relationships with Epstein and involvement in various business entities connected to him. The estate rejected those concerns, arguing that the executors' previous relationships with Epstein did not automatically disqualify them from administering his assets. Its attorneys maintained that there was no evidence either executor had violated his fiduciary duties or improperly managed estate property. The filing also challenged the government's justification for intervention, arguing that the Superior Court already possessed the authority to supervise estate administration. Furthermore, the estate accused the government of creating an artificial emergency by waiting more than five months after the probate proceedings began before attempting to intervene.

The estate's principal legal argument centered on the Virgin Islands government's alleged failure to follow the mandatory procedures governing claims against a deceased person's estate. According to the memorandum, the government improperly relied on Rule 24 of the Virgin Islands Rules of Civil Procedure rather than the specific probate statutes established under Title 15 of the Virgin Islands Code. Those provisions required creditors to submit verified claims directly to the estate's executors, who would then review and either approve or reject them before further legal proceedings could commence. Instead, the government filed a separate civil action against the estate on January 15, 2020, and subsequently attempted to enter the probate proceedings without completing that process. The estate argued that allowing such intervention would undermine established probate rules and potentially give the government an unfair advantage over other creditors seeking compensation from Epstein's assets. Its attorneys further maintained that even if Rule 24 applied, the government's interest remained contingent on successfully pursuing its separate lawsuit, making that interest insufficient to justify intervention. The memorandum ultimately asked the Superior Court to deny the government's motion and require it to pursue its claims through the established probate process. The dispute reflected a broader struggle over control of Epstein's remaining fortune, with Virgin Islands authorities attempting to secure greater oversight of assets connected to their sex trafficking allegations while Indyke and Kahn sought to preserve their authority over the estate and its proposed compensation program.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>839epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-uk-investigation-into-virginia-robert-s-allegations-against-andrew-11-2-26--76113702
Channel 4 News subsequently revealed that Giuffre had approached British police again in 2016, offering additional evidence and identifying potential witnesses, yet her efforts still failed to produce a full investigation. Scotland Yard reviewed its position in 2019, 2021, and 2022, repeatedly declining to pursue the matter even as Andrew's relationship with Epstein attracted increasing international scrutiny. The decision became particularly controversial after Giuffre filed her civil lawsuit against Andrew in August 2021, placing allegations that British authorities had declined to investigate before an American federal judge. Throughout this period, Andrew maintained his denials, publicly questioned Giuffre's credibility, and continued to benefit from the extraordinary institutional resources and public standing associated with his position in the royal family. The contrast was difficult to ignore: while Giuffre spent years fighting to have her allegations seriously examined, the British criminal justice system never subjected Andrew to a full criminal investigation over her accusations.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76113702Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciFor years, Virginia Roberts Giuffre's allegations against Prince Andrew were met with institutional resistance, repeated refusals to pursue a full criminal investigation, and a remarkable lack of accountability in the United Kingdom, despite the...
Channel 4 News subsequently revealed that Giuffre had approached British police again in 2016, offering additional evidence and identifying potential witnesses, yet her efforts still failed to produce a full investigation. Scotland Yard reviewed its position in 2019, 2021, and 2022, repeatedly declining to pursue the matter even as Andrew's relationship with Epstein attracted increasing international scrutiny. The decision became particularly controversial after Giuffre filed her civil lawsuit against Andrew in August 2021, placing allegations that British authorities had declined to investigate before an American federal judge. Throughout this period, Andrew maintained his denials, publicly questioned Giuffre's credibility, and continued to benefit from the extraordinary institutional resources and public standing associated with his position in the royal family. The contrast was difficult to ignore: while Giuffre spent years fighting to have her allegations seriously examined, the British criminal justice system never subjected Andrew to a full criminal investigation over her accusations.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2869epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-virginia-robert-s-called-for-transparency-long-before-the-efta-11-2-26--76113700
Giuffre's years-long fight for transparency carried particular significance because it began well before the Epstein scandal became a major political issue and before lawmakers embraced the idea of requiring the Justice Department to release its investigative records. She understood from personal experience how sealed documents, confidentiality agreements, legal maneuvering, and institutional resistance could prevent survivors from obtaining answers about the people who had abused them and those who had facilitated their exploitation. Her willingness to publicly identify Epstein, Maxwell, and prominent individuals she accused of misconduct helped force questions into the open that powerful people had spent years attempting to avoid. Although some documents were eventually released through litigation, enormous portions of the federal investigative record remained inaccessible, leaving fundamental questions about Epstein's broader operation unresolved. Giuffre died on April 25, 2025, nearly seven months before the Epstein Files Transparency Act became law on November 19, meaning she never lived to witness the federal government being placed under a statutory obligation to disclose its Epstein-related records. Her family subsequently joined other survivors in urging Congress to pass the legislation, explicitly connecting the demand for transparency to Virginia's years of advocacy and the unanswered questions surrounding Epstein's associates. The campaign for disclosure therefore did not begin with congressional hearings, political speeches, or the introduction of the EFTA in July 2025, but grew out of years of legal battles and public advocacy by survivors who had repeatedly demanded access to information. Giuffre was among the most prominent voices in that struggle, helping establish the foundation for a transparency movement that eventually reached Congress. Her death before the legislation's passage underscored the extraordinary length of time survivors had been forced to fight for records that might have exposed additional wrongdoing and institutional failures. The Epstein Files Transparency Act represented a significant legislative development, but it also reflected a demand for accountability that Virginia Roberts Giuffre and other survivors had been making long before Washington finally responded.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76113700Mon, 02 Nov 2026 09:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciLong before Congress passed the Epstein Files Transparency Act in November 2025, Virginia Roberts Giuffre spent years demanding greater transparency surrounding Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and the powerful individuals connected to their sexual...
Giuffre's years-long fight for transparency carried particular significance because it began well before the Epstein scandal became a major political issue and before lawmakers embraced the idea of requiring the Justice Department to release its investigative records. She understood from personal experience how sealed documents, confidentiality agreements, legal maneuvering, and institutional resistance could prevent survivors from obtaining answers about the people who had abused them and those who had facilitated their exploitation. Her willingness to publicly identify Epstein, Maxwell, and prominent individuals she accused of misconduct helped force questions into the open that powerful people had spent years attempting to avoid. Although some documents were eventually released through litigation, enormous portions of the federal investigative record remained inaccessible, leaving fundamental questions about Epstein's broader operation unresolved. Giuffre died on April 25, 2025, nearly seven months before the Epstein Files Transparency Act became law on November 19, meaning she never lived to witness the federal government being placed under a statutory obligation to disclose its Epstein-related records. Her family subsequently joined other survivors in urging Congress to pass the legislation, explicitly connecting the demand for transparency to Virginia's years of advocacy and the unanswered questions surrounding Epstein's associates. The campaign for disclosure therefore did not begin with congressional hearings, political speeches, or the introduction of the EFTA in July 2025, but grew out of years of legal battles and public advocacy by survivors who had repeatedly demanded access to information. Giuffre was among the most prominent voices in that struggle, helping establish the foundation for a transparency movement that eventually reached Congress. Her death before the legislation's passage underscored the extraordinary length of time survivors had been forced to fight for records that might have exposed additional wrongdoing and institutional failures. The Epstein Files...]]>2776epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-how-the-epstein-investigation-was-built-to-fail-11-1-26--76113701
When Epstein became a liability who might talk, the narrow investigation became untenable, but his removal did not erase the evidence. Financial records, emails, and transaction histories still exist and still point to beneficiaries who profited while keeping their hands “clean.” The unanswered questions are all financial: who received money, who structured the vehicles, who vouched for him, and who chose profit over accountability. The contrast with cases like Martha Stewart exposes the hypocrisy of enforcement priorities, where market disruption is punished but elite stability is protected. Figures like Leon Black and Les Wexner exemplify how proximity to power insulates culpability through delay and fragmentation. The investigation was tilted long before Epstein’s death, designed to deliver a villain without a reckoning. Survivors were denied full accountability, and the public was given closure without truth. Until the financial architecture that enabled Epstein is confronted, justice has not begun—it has been deliberately postponed.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76113701Mon, 02 Nov 2026 07:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciFrom the start, the Epstein investigation was engineered to produce narrow results. Narrow charges do not emerge naturally when evidence points to a sprawling criminal enterprise fueled by money, access, and institutional protection. The focus on...
When Epstein became a liability who might talk, the narrow investigation became untenable, but his removal did not erase the evidence. Financial records, emails, and transaction histories still exist and still point to beneficiaries who profited while keeping their hands “clean.” The unanswered questions are all financial: who received money, who structured the vehicles, who vouched for him, and who chose profit over accountability. The contrast with cases like Martha Stewart exposes the hypocrisy of enforcement priorities, where market disruption is punished but elite stability is protected. Figures like Leon Black and Les Wexner exemplify how proximity to power insulates culpability through delay and fragmentation. The investigation was tilted long before Epstein’s death, designed to deliver a villain without a reckoning. Survivors were denied full accountability, and the public was given closure without truth. Until the financial architecture that enabled Epstein is confronted, justice has not begun—it has been deliberately postponed.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3330epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-murder-of-shanquella-robinson--76113129



On October 29, 2022, 25-year-old Shanquella Robinson, a Charlotte, North Carolina, businesswoman, died under horrifying circumstances while vacationing with six acquaintances in San José del Cabo, Mexico. Robinson had arrived in Mexico just one day earlier to celebrate a birthday, but what was supposed to be an enjoyable getaway quickly turned into a nightmare. Her traveling companions initially told her family that she had died from alcohol poisoning, an explanation that immediately raised suspicions. Those suspicions intensified when a disturbing cellphone video surfaced showing Robinson, naked and defenseless, being violently beaten by another woman while people nearby watched and recorded the assault. The footage showed Robinson being repeatedly punched and thrown to the ground, with one person asking why she wasn't fighting back. A Mexican autopsy subsequently determined that Robinson had suffered a severe spinal cord injury and dislocation of the upper cervical vertebrae, contradicting the initial explanation involving alcohol. Mexican authorities opened a femicide investigation and eventually issued an arrest warrant for a female suspect connected to the attack. The revelation that Robinson had been brutally assaulted while surrounded by people she believed were her friends sparked national outrage and raised serious questions about the actions of everyone present during her final hours.

Despite the disturbing video evidence and the findings of Mexican investigators, efforts to obtain criminal accountability for Robinson's death became mired in jurisdictional complications and conflicting forensic conclusions. In April 2023, the United States Department of Justice announced that federal prosecutors would not pursue criminal charges, citing insufficient evidence to establish that a federal crime had occurred beyond a reasonable doubt. A second autopsy conducted in North Carolina reportedly failed to confirm the spinal injuries identified by Mexican examiners, creating a significant discrepancy that complicated the investigation. Robinson's family fiercely criticized the decision, arguing that the video and circumstances surrounding her death warranted prosecution and questioning why the people who accompanied her to Mexico had not been held accountable. Although Mexican authorities had issued an arrest warrant, no extradition or criminal prosecution followed, leaving her family without the justice they had demanded. In October 2024, Robinson's mother, Sallamondra Robinson, filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the six traveling companions, accusing them of responsibility for her daughter's death and the circumstances surrounding it. The civil case continued through 2026, with a North Carolina judge rejecting one defendant's attempt to have the lawsuit dismissed in June. Nearly four years after Robinson's death, no one had been criminally convicted in connection with the killing, leaving a grieving family confronting an extraordinary situation in which a violent assault had been captured on video, yet the American and Mexican legal systems had failed to produce a criminal conviction.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com









Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76113129Mon, 02 Nov 2026 05:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciOn October 29, 2022, 25-year-old Shanquella Robinson, a Charlotte, North Carolina, businesswoman, died under horrifying circumstances while vacationing with six acquaintances in San José del Cabo, Mexico. Robinson had arrived in Mexico just one day...



On October 29, 2022, 25-year-old Shanquella Robinson, a Charlotte, North Carolina, businesswoman, died under horrifying circumstances while vacationing with six acquaintances in San José del Cabo, Mexico. Robinson had arrived in Mexico just one day earlier to celebrate a birthday, but what was supposed to be an enjoyable getaway quickly turned into a nightmare. Her traveling companions initially told her family that she had died from alcohol poisoning, an explanation that immediately raised suspicions. Those suspicions intensified when a disturbing cellphone video surfaced showing Robinson, naked and defenseless, being violently beaten by another woman while people nearby watched and recorded the assault. The footage showed Robinson being repeatedly punched and thrown to the ground, with one person asking why she wasn't fighting back. A Mexican autopsy subsequently determined that Robinson had suffered a severe spinal cord injury and dislocation of the upper cervical vertebrae, contradicting the initial explanation involving alcohol. Mexican authorities opened a femicide investigation and eventually issued an arrest warrant for a female suspect connected to the attack. The revelation that Robinson had been brutally assaulted while surrounded by people she believed were her friends sparked national outrage and raised serious questions about the actions of everyone present during her final hours.

Despite the disturbing video evidence and the findings of Mexican investigators, efforts to obtain criminal accountability for Robinson's death became mired in jurisdictional complications and conflicting forensic conclusions. In April 2023, the United States Department of Justice announced that federal prosecutors would not pursue criminal charges, citing insufficient evidence to establish that a federal crime had occurred beyond a reasonable doubt. A second autopsy conducted in North Carolina reportedly failed to confirm the spinal injuries identified by Mexican examiners, creating a significant discrepancy that complicated the investigation. Robinson's family fiercely criticized the decision, arguing that the video and circumstances surrounding her death warranted prosecution and questioning why the people who accompanied her to Mexico had not been held accountable. Although Mexican authorities had issued an arrest warrant, no extradition or criminal prosecution followed, leaving her family without the justice they had demanded. In October 2024, Robinson's mother, Sallamondra Robinson, filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the six traveling companions, accusing them of responsibility for her daughter's death and the circumstances surrounding it. The civil case continued through 2026, with a North Carolina judge rejecting one defendant's attempt to have the lawsuit dismissed in June. Nearly four years after Robinson's death, no one had been criminally convicted in connection with the killing, leaving a grieving family confronting an extraordinary situation in which a violent assault had been captured on video, yet the American and Mexican legal systems had failed to produce a criminal conviction.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com









Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>646breakingnews,buzzfeedunsolvedtruecrime,news,truecrime,truecrimeaddict,truecrimeallthetime,truecrimeandchill,truecrimebooks,truecrimecommunity,truecrimefan,truecrimegarage,truecrimejunkie,truecrimeobsessed,truecrimepodcast,truecrimepodcasts,truecrimereport,truecrimes,truecrimestoriestruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-mexican-government-and-their-hunt-for-el-mencho--76113128
to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76113128Mon, 02 Nov 2026 03:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciFor more than a decade, the Mexican government conducted an intensive manhunt for Nemesio Oseguera Cervantes, better known as El Mencho, the ruthless leader of the Jalisco New Generation Cartel (CJNG), who became one of the most powerful and elusive...
to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>876cartelsofmexico,cjng,mexicoswarondrugs,narcas,sinaloacartel,thewarondrugshasfailed,thewarondrugsisreallythewarony,truecrime,truecrimeaddict,truecrimecommunity,truecrimefan,truecrimejunkie,truecrimeobsessed,truecrimepodcast,truecrimestruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-day-6-part-11-11-1-26--76100498
The defense concentrated much of its closing argument on the aggravating circumstance that could keep the aggravated-murder charge death-penalty eligible: whether the shooter knowingly created a great risk of death to someone other than Kirk. Attorney Staci Visser stressed that there had been one shot, one bullet and one person struck, arguing that prosecutors were stretching possible dangers—such as a miss, ricochet or pass-through bullet—into proof that another person had actually been placed within the legally required “zone of danger.” Richard Novak separately challenged the state’s evidence concerning political motivation and whether Robinson could reasonably have known children were present. Prosecutor Chad Grunander answered that argument by describing the shot as “ballistic roulette,” emphasizing that Kirk was surrounded by security personnel, a questioner and thousands of spectators and arguing that a slight error in aim could easily have killed someone else. The fundamental dispute at closing was therefore not simply whether the state could identify Robinson as the alleged shooter, but whether prosecutors had established the aggravating circumstances and enhancements necessary to carry the entire case—including its potential death penalty—forward to trial.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76100498Mon, 02 Nov 2026 01:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciDay six of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing, held September 1, 2026, centered on closing arguments and the prosecution’s claim that the evidence easily cleared Utah’s probable-cause standard. Deputy Utah County Attorney Ryan McBride argued that...
The defense concentrated much of its closing argument on the aggravating circumstance that could keep the aggravated-murder charge death-penalty eligible: whether the shooter knowingly created a great risk of death to someone other than Kirk. Attorney Staci Visser stressed that there had been one shot, one bullet and one person struck, arguing that prosecutors were stretching possible dangers—such as a miss, ricochet or pass-through bullet—into proof that another person had actually been placed within the legally required “zone of danger.” Richard Novak separately challenged the state’s evidence concerning political motivation and whether Robinson could reasonably have known children were present. Prosecutor Chad Grunander answered that argument by describing the shot as “ballistic roulette,” emphasizing that Kirk was surrounded by security personnel, a questioner and thousands of spectators and arguing that a slight error in aim could easily have killed someone else. The fundamental dispute at closing was therefore not simply whether the state could identify Robinson as the alleged shooter, but whether prosecutors had established the aggravating circumstances and enhancements necessary to carry the entire case—including its potential death penalty—forward to trial.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>772breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-day-6-part-10-11-1-26--76100497
The defense concentrated much of its closing argument on the aggravating circumstance that could keep the aggravated-murder charge death-penalty eligible: whether the shooter knowingly created a great risk of death to someone other than Kirk. Attorney Staci Visser stressed that there had been one shot, one bullet and one person struck, arguing that prosecutors were stretching possible dangers—such as a miss, ricochet or pass-through bullet—into proof that another person had actually been placed within the legally required “zone of danger.” Richard Novak separately challenged the state’s evidence concerning political motivation and whether Robinson could reasonably have known children were present. Prosecutor Chad Grunander answered that argument by describing the shot as “ballistic roulette,” emphasizing that Kirk was surrounded by security personnel, a questioner and thousands of spectators and arguing that a slight error in aim could easily have killed someone else. The fundamental dispute at closing was therefore not simply whether the state could identify Robinson as the alleged shooter, but whether prosecutors had established the aggravating circumstances and enhancements necessary to carry the entire case—including its potential death penalty—forward to trial.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76100497Sun, 01 Nov 2026 23:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciDay six of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing, held September 1, 2026, centered on closing arguments and the prosecution’s claim that the evidence easily cleared Utah’s probable-cause standard. Deputy Utah County Attorney Ryan McBride argued that...
The defense concentrated much of its closing argument on the aggravating circumstance that could keep the aggravated-murder charge death-penalty eligible: whether the shooter knowingly created a great risk of death to someone other than Kirk. Attorney Staci Visser stressed that there had been one shot, one bullet and one person struck, arguing that prosecutors were stretching possible dangers—such as a miss, ricochet or pass-through bullet—into proof that another person had actually been placed within the legally required “zone of danger.” Richard Novak separately challenged the state’s evidence concerning political motivation and whether Robinson could reasonably have known children were present. Prosecutor Chad Grunander answered that argument by describing the shot as “ballistic roulette,” emphasizing that Kirk was surrounded by security personnel, a questioner and thousands of spectators and arguing that a slight error in aim could easily have killed someone else. The fundamental dispute at closing was therefore not simply whether the state could identify Robinson as the alleged shooter, but whether prosecutors had established the aggravating circumstances and enhancements necessary to carry the entire case—including its potential death penalty—forward to trial.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>832breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/virginia-roberts-and-her-2nd-supplemental-response-to-maxwell-s-discovery-request-part-5-10-31-26--75999413
Giuffre nevertheless agreed to continue producing non-privileged responsive records, repeatedly noting that she had already turned over documents Bates-numbered GIUFFRE000001 through GIUFFRE005353 and would supplement those productions. At the same time, she drew hard lines around particularly sensitive material, withholding privileged documents, information connected to ongoing law-enforcement investigations and photographs revealing the faces of her minor children. She also argued that Maxwell was demanding some information that was already within Maxwell’s or Epstein’s possession while Maxwell herself was asserting privilege over related material. One of Maxwell’s broadest requests sought virtually every communication from 1998 forward concerning Maxwell, Epstein, Dershowitz, Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton and other identified individuals; Giuffre objected that such a demand swept far beyond what was reasonably necessary for the defamation case. Taken as a whole, the filing showed how fiercely the two sides were battling over discovery in 2016: Maxwell was attempting to probe nearly every aspect of Giuffre’s allegations, history and relationships, while Giuffre was cooperating with document production but arguing that Maxwell’s lawyers were using discovery to intrude into areas that had little legitimate connection to the claims being litigated.


to ontact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75999413Sun, 01 Nov 2026 21:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn her April 29, 2016 second amended supplemental discovery response, Virginia Giuffre pushed back aggressively against Ghislaine Maxwell’s effort to obtain an enormous range of information about her personal life, allegations, relationships and...
Giuffre nevertheless agreed to continue producing non-privileged responsive records, repeatedly noting that she had already turned over documents Bates-numbered GIUFFRE000001 through GIUFFRE005353 and would supplement those productions. At the same time, she drew hard lines around particularly sensitive material, withholding privileged documents, information connected to ongoing law-enforcement investigations and photographs revealing the faces of her minor children. She also argued that Maxwell was demanding some information that was already within Maxwell’s or Epstein’s possession while Maxwell herself was asserting privilege over related material. One of Maxwell’s broadest requests sought virtually every communication from 1998 forward concerning Maxwell, Epstein, Dershowitz, Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton and other identified individuals; Giuffre objected that such a demand swept far beyond what was reasonably necessary for the defamation case. Taken as a whole, the filing showed how fiercely the two sides were battling over discovery in 2016: Maxwell was attempting to probe nearly every aspect of Giuffre’s allegations, history and relationships, while Giuffre was cooperating with document production but arguing that Maxwell’s lawyers were using discovery to intrude into areas that had little legitimate connection to the claims being litigated.


to ontact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1611epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/virginia-roberts-and-her-2nd-supplemental-response-to-maxwell-s-discovery-request-part-4-10-31-26--75999416
Giuffre nevertheless agreed to continue producing non-privileged responsive records, repeatedly noting that she had already turned over documents Bates-numbered GIUFFRE000001 through GIUFFRE005353 and would supplement those productions. At the same time, she drew hard lines around particularly sensitive material, withholding privileged documents, information connected to ongoing law-enforcement investigations and photographs revealing the faces of her minor children. She also argued that Maxwell was demanding some information that was already within Maxwell’s or Epstein’s possession while Maxwell herself was asserting privilege over related material. One of Maxwell’s broadest requests sought virtually every communication from 1998 forward concerning Maxwell, Epstein, Dershowitz, Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton and other identified individuals; Giuffre objected that such a demand swept far beyond what was reasonably necessary for the defamation case. Taken as a whole, the filing showed how fiercely the two sides were battling over discovery in 2016: Maxwell was attempting to probe nearly every aspect of Giuffre’s allegations, history and relationships, while Giuffre was cooperating with document production but arguing that Maxwell’s lawyers were using discovery to intrude into areas that had little legitimate connection to the claims being litigated.


to ontact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75999416Sun, 01 Nov 2026 19:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciIn her April 29, 2016 second amended supplemental discovery response, Virginia Giuffre pushed back aggressively against Ghislaine Maxwell’s effort to obtain an enormous range of information about her personal life, allegations, relationships and...
Giuffre nevertheless agreed to continue producing non-privileged responsive records, repeatedly noting that she had already turned over documents Bates-numbered GIUFFRE000001 through GIUFFRE005353 and would supplement those productions. At the same time, she drew hard lines around particularly sensitive material, withholding privileged documents, information connected to ongoing law-enforcement investigations and photographs revealing the faces of her minor children. She also argued that Maxwell was demanding some information that was already within Maxwell’s or Epstein’s possession while Maxwell herself was asserting privilege over related material. One of Maxwell’s broadest requests sought virtually every communication from 1998 forward concerning Maxwell, Epstein, Dershowitz, Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton and other identified individuals; Giuffre objected that such a demand swept far beyond what was reasonably necessary for the defamation case. Taken as a whole, the filing showed how fiercely the two sides were battling over discovery in 2016: Maxwell was attempting to probe nearly every aspect of Giuffre’s allegations, history and relationships, while Giuffre was cooperating with document production but arguing that Maxwell’s lawyers were using discovery to intrude into areas that had little legitimate connection to the claims being litigated.


to ontact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>805epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/virginia-roberts-and-her-2nd-supplemental-response-to-maxwell-s-discovery-request-part-3-10-31-26--75999415
Giuffre nevertheless agreed to continue producing non-privileged responsive records, repeatedly noting that she had already turned over documents Bates-numbered GIUFFRE000001 through GIUFFRE005353 and would supplement those productions. At the same time, she drew hard lines around particularly sensitive material, withholding privileged documents, information connected to ongoing law-enforcement investigations and photographs revealing the faces of her minor children. She also argued that Maxwell was demanding some information that was already within Maxwell’s or Epstein’s possession while Maxwell herself was asserting privilege over related material. One of Maxwell’s broadest requests sought virtually every communication from 1998 forward concerning Maxwell, Epstein, Dershowitz, Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton and other identified individuals; Giuffre objected that such a demand swept far beyond what was reasonably necessary for the defamation case. Taken as a whole, the filing showed how fiercely the two sides were battling over discovery in 2016: Maxwell was attempting to probe nearly every aspect of Giuffre’s allegations, history and relationships, while Giuffre was cooperating with document production but arguing that Maxwell’s lawyers were using discovery to intrude into areas that had little legitimate connection to the claims being litigated.


to ontact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75999415Sun, 01 Nov 2026 17:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciIn her April 29, 2016 second amended supplemental discovery response, Virginia Giuffre pushed back aggressively against Ghislaine Maxwell’s effort to obtain an enormous range of information about her personal life, allegations, relationships and...
Giuffre nevertheless agreed to continue producing non-privileged responsive records, repeatedly noting that she had already turned over documents Bates-numbered GIUFFRE000001 through GIUFFRE005353 and would supplement those productions. At the same time, she drew hard lines around particularly sensitive material, withholding privileged documents, information connected to ongoing law-enforcement investigations and photographs revealing the faces of her minor children. She also argued that Maxwell was demanding some information that was already within Maxwell’s or Epstein’s possession while Maxwell herself was asserting privilege over related material. One of Maxwell’s broadest requests sought virtually every communication from 1998 forward concerning Maxwell, Epstein, Dershowitz, Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton and other identified individuals; Giuffre objected that such a demand swept far beyond what was reasonably necessary for the defamation case. Taken as a whole, the filing showed how fiercely the two sides were battling over discovery in 2016: Maxwell was attempting to probe nearly every aspect of Giuffre’s allegations, history and relationships, while Giuffre was cooperating with document production but arguing that Maxwell’s lawyers were using discovery to intrude into areas that had little legitimate connection to the claims being litigated.


to ontact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>759epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-ghislaine-maxwell-and-her-date-with-the-state-11-1-26--76099210
Expectations outside the courtroom were considerably broader than what prosecutors actually needed to prove. There was widespread anticipation that Maxwell’s trial might expose previously unknown information about Epstein’s relationships with wealthy businessmen, politicians, academics and members of royalty, and that famous names connected to his aircraft, homes and social circle could surface during testimony. But experienced lawyers cautioned beforehand that the trial was unlikely to become a sweeping public inquiry into everyone who had associated with Epstein; the government’s task was much narrower—prove that Maxwell knowingly participated in the recruitment and grooming of minors. Prosecutors were expected to present Maxwell as Epstein’s essential partner and gatekeeper, while the defense was expected to portray Epstein as the true predator and Maxwell as a convenient substitute defendant who was being prosecuted because Epstein was dead. The central prediction was that the case would ultimately become a credibility battle between Maxwell and the women accusing her, with prosecutors relying on firsthand survivor testimony and corroborating records while the defense tried to create reasonable doubt by attacking memories formed decades earlier. That prediction proved largely accurate, although the trial moved far faster than expected: instead of six weeks, prosecutors presented 24 witnesses over roughly 10 trial days, the defense called nine witnesses over two days, and Maxwell was ultimately convicted on five of the six counts submitted to the jury.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76099210Sun, 01 Nov 2026 15:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciThe lead-up to Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial was marked by extraordinary public attention, repeated bail fights and intense speculation about how much of Jeffrey Epstein’s hidden world would finally be exposed in open court. Maxwell had been arrested in...
Expectations outside the courtroom were considerably broader than what prosecutors actually needed to prove. There was widespread anticipation that Maxwell’s trial might expose previously unknown information about Epstein’s relationships with wealthy businessmen, politicians, academics and members of royalty, and that famous names connected to his aircraft, homes and social circle could surface during testimony. But experienced lawyers cautioned beforehand that the trial was unlikely to become a sweeping public inquiry into everyone who had associated with Epstein; the government’s task was much narrower—prove that Maxwell knowingly participated in the recruitment and grooming of minors. Prosecutors were expected to present Maxwell as Epstein’s essential partner and gatekeeper, while the defense was expected to portray Epstein as the true predator and Maxwell as a convenient substitute defendant who was being prosecuted because Epstein was dead. The central prediction was that the case would ultimately become a credibility battle between Maxwell and the women accusing her, with prosecutors relying on firsthand survivor testimony and corroborating records while the defense tried to create reasonable doubt by attacking memories formed decades earlier. That prediction proved largely accurate, although the trial moved far faster than expected: instead of six weeks, prosecutors presented 24 witnesses over roughly 10 trial days, the defense called nine witnesses over two days, and Maxwell was ultimately convicted on five of the six counts submitted to the jury.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3527epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-amended-epstein-survivor-lawsuit-filed-against-the-usvi-part-4-7-11-1-26--76099195
In this episode, we are taking a look at that complaint.  

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.6.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76099195Sun, 01 Nov 2026 13:20:02 +0000Bobby Capucci​In a lawsuit filed in November 2023, six anonymous plaintiffs, referred to as Jane Does 1–6, initiated a class action against the Government of the United States Virgin Islands (USVI) and several current and former USVI officials. The plaintiffs...
In this episode, we are taking a look at that complaint.  

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.6.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3281epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-amended-epstein-survivor-lawsuit-filed-against-the-usvi-part-1-3-11-1-26--76099193
In this episode, we are taking a look at that complaint.  

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.6.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76099193Sun, 01 Nov 2026 11:20:02 +0000Bobby Capucci​In a lawsuit filed in November 2023, six anonymous plaintiffs, referred to as Jane Does 1–6, initiated a class action against the Government of the United States Virgin Islands (USVI) and several current and former USVI officials. The plaintiffs...
In this episode, we are taking a look at that complaint.  

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.6.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2475epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-epstein-survivors-class-action-suit-filed-against-jp-morgan-part-5-9-11-1-26--76099192
The case became especially damaging for JPMorgan as discovery exposed internal records showing that concerns about Epstein had circulated inside the bank for years before it finally ended the relationship in 2013. JPMorgan denied knowingly participating in Epstein’s crimes and tried to place much of the responsibility on Staley, even suing its former executive and arguing that he had concealed the true nature of his relationship with Epstein. Rather than take the survivors’ class action to trial, JPMorgan agreed in June 2023 to pay $290 million to settle claims brought on behalf of women who had been sexually abused or trafficked by Epstein, without admitting wrongdoing. The settlement was significant because it represented one of the clearest attempts to hold a major financial institution accountable for the infrastructure that allowed Epstein to operate for years: the survivors argued that his trafficking network required money, cash, accounts and financial access, and that JPMorgan continued providing those services long after there were ample reasons to question exactly what its client was doing.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76099192Sun, 01 Nov 2026 08:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciA group of Jeffrey Epstein survivors sued JPMorgan Chase in late 2022, alleging that the bank knowingly benefited from and helped facilitate Epstein’s sex-trafficking operation by continuing to provide him with extensive banking services despite years...
The case became especially damaging for JPMorgan as discovery exposed internal records showing that concerns about Epstein had circulated inside the bank for years before it finally ended the relationship in 2013. JPMorgan denied knowingly participating in Epstein’s crimes and tried to place much of the responsibility on Staley, even suing its former executive and arguing that he had concealed the true nature of his relationship with Epstein. Rather than take the survivors’ class action to trial, JPMorgan agreed in June 2023 to pay $290 million to settle claims brought on behalf of women who had been sexually abused or trafficked by Epstein, without admitting wrongdoing. The settlement was significant because it represented one of the clearest attempts to hold a major financial institution accountable for the infrastructure that allowed Epstein to operate for years: the survivors argued that his trafficking network required money, cash, accounts and financial access, and that JPMorgan continued providing those services long after there were ample reasons to question exactly what its client was doing.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3649epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-epstein-survivors-class-action-suit-filed-against-jp-morgan-part-1-4-10-31-26--76099194
The case became especially damaging for JPMorgan as discovery exposed internal records showing that concerns about Epstein had circulated inside the bank for years before it finally ended the relationship in 2013. JPMorgan denied knowingly participating in Epstein’s crimes and tried to place much of the responsibility on Staley, even suing its former executive and arguing that he had concealed the true nature of his relationship with Epstein. Rather than take the survivors’ class action to trial, JPMorgan agreed in June 2023 to pay $290 million to settle claims brought on behalf of women who had been sexually abused or trafficked by Epstein, without admitting wrongdoing. The settlement was significant because it represented one of the clearest attempts to hold a major financial institution accountable for the infrastructure that allowed Epstein to operate for years: the survivors argued that his trafficking network required money, cash, accounts and financial access, and that JPMorgan continued providing those services long after there were ample reasons to question exactly what its client was doing.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76099194Sun, 01 Nov 2026 06:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciA group of Jeffrey Epstein survivors sued JPMorgan Chase in late 2022, alleging that the bank knowingly benefited from and helped facilitate Epstein’s sex-trafficking operation by continuing to provide him with extensive banking services despite years...
The case became especially damaging for JPMorgan as discovery exposed internal records showing that concerns about Epstein had circulated inside the bank for years before it finally ended the relationship in 2013. JPMorgan denied knowingly participating in Epstein’s crimes and tried to place much of the responsibility on Staley, even suing its former executive and arguing that he had concealed the true nature of his relationship with Epstein. Rather than take the survivors’ class action to trial, JPMorgan agreed in June 2023 to pay $290 million to settle claims brought on behalf of women who had been sexually abused or trafficked by Epstein, without admitting wrongdoing. The settlement was significant because it represented one of the clearest attempts to hold a major financial institution accountable for the infrastructure that allowed Epstein to operate for years: the survivors argued that his trafficking network required money, cash, accounts and financial access, and that JPMorgan continued providing those services long after there were ample reasons to question exactly what its client was doing.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2817epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-death-of-boeing-whistleblower-john-barnett--76100501
Barnett's attorneys, Robert Turkewitz and Brian Knowles, expressed shock at his death and questioned the initial suggestion that he had taken his own life. They described him as being in good spirits, looking forward to completing his deposition, and determined to see his retaliation case through to its conclusion. According to his legal team, Barnett had shown no apparent indications that he was considering suicide, and they urged authorities to conduct a thorough investigation before reaching a final determination. His death occurred during an especially turbulent period for Boeing, which had faced renewed scrutiny following a January 2024 incident in which a door plug separated from an Alaska Airlines 737 MAX aircraft during flight. Federal regulators had also identified manufacturing and quality control deficiencies, adding to concerns about the company's internal safety practices. Boeing expressed sadness over Barnett's death and offered condolences to his family, while his attorneys emphasized the importance of investigating the circumstances without prematurely dismissing unanswered questions. Although the timing initially generated widespread suspicion, a subsequent investigation by Charleston police concluded in May 2024 that Barnett had died by suicide, citing forensic evidence, surveillance footage, and a handwritten note recovered from his vehicle. His death nevertheless intensified attention on the treatment of corporate whistleblowers and the allegations of retaliation he had spent years pursuing against Boeing.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76100501Sun, 01 Nov 2026 04:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciJohn Barnett, a 62-year-old former Boeing quality control manager who had spent years exposing alleged safety violations at the aerospace manufacturer, was found dead on March 9, 2024, inside his pickup truck in the parking lot of a Holiday Inn in...
Barnett's attorneys, Robert Turkewitz and Brian Knowles, expressed shock at his death and questioned the initial suggestion that he had taken his own life. They described him as being in good spirits, looking forward to completing his deposition, and determined to see his retaliation case through to its conclusion. According to his legal team, Barnett had shown no apparent indications that he was considering suicide, and they urged authorities to conduct a thorough investigation before reaching a final determination. His death occurred during an especially turbulent period for Boeing, which had faced renewed scrutiny following a January 2024 incident in which a door plug separated from an Alaska Airlines 737 MAX aircraft during flight. Federal regulators had also identified manufacturing and quality control deficiencies, adding to concerns about the company's internal safety practices. Boeing expressed sadness over Barnett's death and offered condolences to his family, while his attorneys emphasized the importance of investigating the circumstances without prematurely dismissing unanswered questions. Although the timing initially generated widespread suspicion, a subsequent investigation by Charleston police concluded in May 2024 that Barnett had died by suicide, citing forensic evidence, surveillance footage, and a handwritten note recovered from his vehicle. His death nevertheless intensified attention on the treatment of corporate whistleblowers and the allegations of retaliation he had spent years pursuing against Boeing.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1675breakingnews,buzzfeedunsolvedtruecrime,news,truecrime,truecrimeaddict,truecrimeallthetime,truecrimeandchill,truecrimebooks,truecrimecommunity,truecrimefan,truecrimegarage,truecrimejunkie,truecrimeobsessed,truecrimepodcast,truecrimepodcasts,truecrimereport,truecrimes,truecrimestoriestruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-chaos-that-ensued-in-the-wake-of-the-arrest-of-ovidio-guzman--76100500
The violence followed a major operation to capture Ovidio Guzmán, who had allegedly assumed an important leadership role within the Sinaloa Cartel following his father's extradition to the United States in 2017. American authorities had accused Guzmán and his brother Joaquín of overseeing substantial methamphetamine production operations and had offered a $5 million reward for information leading to his arrest or conviction. The arrest carried particular significance because Mexican security forces had previously captured Guzmán in October 2019 but released him after heavily armed cartel members unleashed widespread violence throughout Culiacán, overwhelming security forces and threatening civilians. Determined to avoid a repeat of that humiliation, Mexican authorities transported Guzmán to Mexico City shortly after his latest capture. The renewed fighting exposed the extraordinary military capabilities of the Sinaloa Cartel, whose gunmen had demonstrated their ability to challenge government forces, attack airports, disrupt transportation networks, and effectively paralyze a major Mexican city. The operation also placed renewed scrutiny on President Andrés Manuel López Obrador's security strategy, which had emphasized addressing the underlying causes of crime rather than relying exclusively on military confrontation. The arrest occurred shortly before a scheduled North American leaders' summit involving López Obrador and American President Joe Biden, underscoring the international significance of the government's confrontation with one of the world's most powerful drug trafficking organizations.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76100500Sun, 01 Nov 2026 02:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciMexican authorities deployed heavily armed soldiers, armored vehicles, and military aircraft to the streets of Culiacán, Sinaloa, in January 2023 after the arrest of Ovidio Guzmán López, the son of notorious drug lord Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán,...
The violence followed a major operation to capture Ovidio Guzmán, who had allegedly assumed an important leadership role within the Sinaloa Cartel following his father's extradition to the United States in 2017. American authorities had accused Guzmán and his brother Joaquín of overseeing substantial methamphetamine production operations and had offered a $5 million reward for information leading to his arrest or conviction. The arrest carried particular significance because Mexican security forces had previously captured Guzmán in October 2019 but released him after heavily armed cartel members unleashed widespread violence throughout Culiacán, overwhelming security forces and threatening civilians. Determined to avoid a repeat of that humiliation, Mexican authorities transported Guzmán to Mexico City shortly after his latest capture. The renewed fighting exposed the extraordinary military capabilities of the Sinaloa Cartel, whose gunmen had demonstrated their ability to challenge government forces, attack airports, disrupt transportation networks, and effectively paralyze a major Mexican city. The operation also placed renewed scrutiny on President Andrés Manuel López Obrador's security strategy, which had emphasized addressing the underlying causes of crime rather than relying exclusively on military confrontation. The arrest occurred shortly before a scheduled North American leaders' summit involving López Obrador and American President Joe Biden, underscoring the international significance of the government's confrontation with one of the world's most powerful drug trafficking organizations.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>782breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,cartel,cartelnews,chapitos,cjng,elchapo,elmayo,elmayozambada,jaliscocartel,loschapitos,mayitos,mexico,narcos,news,occ,organizedcrime,rico,sinaloacartel,zambadatruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-day-6-part-9-10-31-26--76098872
The defense concentrated much of its closing argument on the aggravating circumstance that could keep the aggravated-murder charge death-penalty eligible: whether the shooter knowingly created a great risk of death to someone other than Kirk. Attorney Staci Visser stressed that there had been one shot, one bullet and one person struck, arguing that prosecutors were stretching possible dangers—such as a miss, ricochet or pass-through bullet—into proof that another person had actually been placed within the legally required “zone of danger.” Richard Novak separately challenged the state’s evidence concerning political motivation and whether Robinson could reasonably have known children were present. Prosecutor Chad Grunander answered that argument by describing the shot as “ballistic roulette,” emphasizing that Kirk was surrounded by security personnel, a questioner and thousands of spectators and arguing that a slight error in aim could easily have killed someone else. The fundamental dispute at closing was therefore not simply whether the state could identify Robinson as the alleged shooter, but whether prosecutors had established the aggravating circumstances and enhancements necessary to carry the entire case—including its potential death penalty—forward to trial.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76098872Sun, 01 Nov 2026 00:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay six of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing, held September 1, 2026, centered on closing arguments and the prosecution’s claim that the evidence easily cleared Utah’s probable-cause standard. Deputy Utah County Attorney Ryan McBride argued that...
The defense concentrated much of its closing argument on the aggravating circumstance that could keep the aggravated-murder charge death-penalty eligible: whether the shooter knowingly created a great risk of death to someone other than Kirk. Attorney Staci Visser stressed that there had been one shot, one bullet and one person struck, arguing that prosecutors were stretching possible dangers—such as a miss, ricochet or pass-through bullet—into proof that another person had actually been placed within the legally required “zone of danger.” Richard Novak separately challenged the state’s evidence concerning political motivation and whether Robinson could reasonably have known children were present. Prosecutor Chad Grunander answered that argument by describing the shot as “ballistic roulette,” emphasizing that Kirk was surrounded by security personnel, a questioner and thousands of spectators and arguing that a slight error in aim could easily have killed someone else. The fundamental dispute at closing was therefore not simply whether the state could identify Robinson as the alleged shooter, but whether prosecutors had established the aggravating circumstances and enhancements necessary to carry the entire case—including its potential death penalty—forward to trial.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>632breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-day-6-part-8-10-31-26--76098876
The defense concentrated much of its closing argument on the aggravating circumstance that could keep the aggravated-murder charge death-penalty eligible: whether the shooter knowingly created a great risk of death to someone other than Kirk. Attorney Staci Visser stressed that there had been one shot, one bullet and one person struck, arguing that prosecutors were stretching possible dangers—such as a miss, ricochet or pass-through bullet—into proof that another person had actually been placed within the legally required “zone of danger.” Richard Novak separately challenged the state’s evidence concerning political motivation and whether Robinson could reasonably have known children were present. Prosecutor Chad Grunander answered that argument by describing the shot as “ballistic roulette,” emphasizing that Kirk was surrounded by security personnel, a questioner and thousands of spectators and arguing that a slight error in aim could easily have killed someone else. The fundamental dispute at closing was therefore not simply whether the state could identify Robinson as the alleged shooter, but whether prosecutors had established the aggravating circumstances and enhancements necessary to carry the entire case—including its potential death penalty—forward to trial.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76098876Sat, 31 Oct 2026 22:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciDay six of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing, held September 1, 2026, centered on closing arguments and the prosecution’s claim that the evidence easily cleared Utah’s probable-cause standard. Deputy Utah County Attorney Ryan McBride argued that...
The defense concentrated much of its closing argument on the aggravating circumstance that could keep the aggravated-murder charge death-penalty eligible: whether the shooter knowingly created a great risk of death to someone other than Kirk. Attorney Staci Visser stressed that there had been one shot, one bullet and one person struck, arguing that prosecutors were stretching possible dangers—such as a miss, ricochet or pass-through bullet—into proof that another person had actually been placed within the legally required “zone of danger.” Richard Novak separately challenged the state’s evidence concerning political motivation and whether Robinson could reasonably have known children were present. Prosecutor Chad Grunander answered that argument by describing the shot as “ballistic roulette,” emphasizing that Kirk was surrounded by security personnel, a questioner and thousands of spectators and arguing that a slight error in aim could easily have killed someone else. The fundamental dispute at closing was therefore not simply whether the state could identify Robinson as the alleged shooter, but whether prosecutors had established the aggravating circumstances and enhancements necessary to carry the entire case—including its potential death penalty—forward to trial.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>714breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-epstein-investigation-why-an-independent-special-counsel-is-long-overdue-part-5-10-31-26--76098873
The special counsel should be an accomplished outsider with no professional or personal interest in protecting the Department of Justice, its former leadership, or the influential individuals connected to Epstein. Experienced criminal attorneys such as Marc Agnifilo, Alan Jackson, or Teny Geragos represent the caliber of legal talent worth considering, provided that a thorough conflict review establishes their independence. Such an investigation would require broad authority, adequate resources, experienced investigators, forensic accountants, and the ability to pursue credible evidence involving financial institutions, former prosecutors, government officials, and potential participants in Epstein's criminal operation. It must also remain independent of partisan political interests, scrutinizing conduct involving Republicans and Democrats alike rather than becoming another instrument of election-year political warfare. Congressional oversight and internal departmental reviews cannot substitute for an independent criminal investigation capable of compelling testimony, examining financial records, and pursuing charges wherever the evidence and law justify them. After years of evasions, institutional defensiveness, and repeated assurances that there is nothing more to investigate, the American people deserve an inquiry that follows the evidence without regard for political influence or professional reputation. The objective must be to determine exactly what happened, identify any criminal wrongdoing that remains prosecutable, and finally establish whether the institutions responsible for enforcing the law helped shield Jeffrey Epstein or others from accountability.



to contact me:


bobbbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76098873Sat, 31 Oct 2026 20:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciFor nearly two decades, the Jeffrey Epstein scandal has exposed profound failures within the American justice system, beginning with the controversial 2007 nonprosecution agreement that allowed Epstein to avoid federal prosecution despite an extensive...
The special counsel should be an accomplished outsider with no professional or personal interest in protecting the Department of Justice, its former leadership, or the influential individuals connected to Epstein. Experienced criminal attorneys such as Marc Agnifilo, Alan Jackson, or Teny Geragos represent the caliber of legal talent worth considering, provided that a thorough conflict review establishes their independence. Such an investigation would require broad authority, adequate resources, experienced investigators, forensic accountants, and the ability to pursue credible evidence involving financial institutions, former prosecutors, government officials, and potential participants in Epstein's criminal operation. It must also remain independent of partisan political interests, scrutinizing conduct involving Republicans and Democrats alike rather than becoming another instrument of election-year political warfare. Congressional oversight and internal departmental reviews cannot substitute for an independent criminal investigation capable of compelling testimony, examining financial records, and pursuing charges wherever the evidence and law justify them. After years of evasions, institutional defensiveness, and repeated assurances that there is nothing more to investigate, the American people deserve an inquiry that follows the evidence without regard for political influence or professional reputation. The objective must be to determine exactly what happened, identify any criminal wrongdoing that remains prosecutable, and finally establish whether the institutions responsible for enforcing the law helped shield Jeffrey Epstein or others from accountability.



to contact me:


bobbbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1019epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-epstein-investigation-why-an-independent-special-counsel-is-long-overdue-part-4-10-31-26--76098871
The special counsel should be an accomplished outsider with no professional or personal interest in protecting the Department of Justice, its former leadership, or the influential individuals connected to Epstein. Experienced criminal attorneys such as Marc Agnifilo, Alan Jackson, or Teny Geragos represent the caliber of legal talent worth considering, provided that a thorough conflict review establishes their independence. Such an investigation would require broad authority, adequate resources, experienced investigators, forensic accountants, and the ability to pursue credible evidence involving financial institutions, former prosecutors, government officials, and potential participants in Epstein's criminal operation. It must also remain independent of partisan political interests, scrutinizing conduct involving Republicans and Democrats alike rather than becoming another instrument of election-year political warfare. Congressional oversight and internal departmental reviews cannot substitute for an independent criminal investigation capable of compelling testimony, examining financial records, and pursuing charges wherever the evidence and law justify them. After years of evasions, institutional defensiveness, and repeated assurances that there is nothing more to investigate, the American people deserve an inquiry that follows the evidence without regard for political influence or professional reputation. The objective must be to determine exactly what happened, identify any criminal wrongdoing that remains prosecutable, and finally establish whether the institutions responsible for enforcing the law helped shield Jeffrey Epstein or others from accountability.



to contact me:


bobbbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76098871Sat, 31 Oct 2026 18:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciFor nearly two decades, the Jeffrey Epstein scandal has exposed profound failures within the American justice system, beginning with the controversial 2007 nonprosecution agreement that allowed Epstein to avoid federal prosecution despite an extensive...
The special counsel should be an accomplished outsider with no professional or personal interest in protecting the Department of Justice, its former leadership, or the influential individuals connected to Epstein. Experienced criminal attorneys such as Marc Agnifilo, Alan Jackson, or Teny Geragos represent the caliber of legal talent worth considering, provided that a thorough conflict review establishes their independence. Such an investigation would require broad authority, adequate resources, experienced investigators, forensic accountants, and the ability to pursue credible evidence involving financial institutions, former prosecutors, government officials, and potential participants in Epstein's criminal operation. It must also remain independent of partisan political interests, scrutinizing conduct involving Republicans and Democrats alike rather than becoming another instrument of election-year political warfare. Congressional oversight and internal departmental reviews cannot substitute for an independent criminal investigation capable of compelling testimony, examining financial records, and pursuing charges wherever the evidence and law justify them. After years of evasions, institutional defensiveness, and repeated assurances that there is nothing more to investigate, the American people deserve an inquiry that follows the evidence without regard for political influence or professional reputation. The objective must be to determine exactly what happened, identify any criminal wrongdoing that remains prosecutable, and finally establish whether the institutions responsible for enforcing the law helped shield Jeffrey Epstein or others from accountability.



to contact me:


bobbbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>695epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-epstein-investigation-why-an-independent-special-counsel-is-long-overdue-part-3-10-31-26--76098874
The special counsel should be an accomplished outsider with no professional or personal interest in protecting the Department of Justice, its former leadership, or the influential individuals connected to Epstein. Experienced criminal attorneys such as Marc Agnifilo, Alan Jackson, or Teny Geragos represent the caliber of legal talent worth considering, provided that a thorough conflict review establishes their independence. Such an investigation would require broad authority, adequate resources, experienced investigators, forensic accountants, and the ability to pursue credible evidence involving financial institutions, former prosecutors, government officials, and potential participants in Epstein's criminal operation. It must also remain independent of partisan political interests, scrutinizing conduct involving Republicans and Democrats alike rather than becoming another instrument of election-year political warfare. Congressional oversight and internal departmental reviews cannot substitute for an independent criminal investigation capable of compelling testimony, examining financial records, and pursuing charges wherever the evidence and law justify them. After years of evasions, institutional defensiveness, and repeated assurances that there is nothing more to investigate, the American people deserve an inquiry that follows the evidence without regard for political influence or professional reputation. The objective must be to determine exactly what happened, identify any criminal wrongdoing that remains prosecutable, and finally establish whether the institutions responsible for enforcing the law helped shield Jeffrey Epstein or others from accountability.



to contact me:


bobbbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76098874Sat, 31 Oct 2026 16:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciFor nearly two decades, the Jeffrey Epstein scandal has exposed profound failures within the American justice system, beginning with the controversial 2007 nonprosecution agreement that allowed Epstein to avoid federal prosecution despite an extensive...
The special counsel should be an accomplished outsider with no professional or personal interest in protecting the Department of Justice, its former leadership, or the influential individuals connected to Epstein. Experienced criminal attorneys such as Marc Agnifilo, Alan Jackson, or Teny Geragos represent the caliber of legal talent worth considering, provided that a thorough conflict review establishes their independence. Such an investigation would require broad authority, adequate resources, experienced investigators, forensic accountants, and the ability to pursue credible evidence involving financial institutions, former prosecutors, government officials, and potential participants in Epstein's criminal operation. It must also remain independent of partisan political interests, scrutinizing conduct involving Republicans and Democrats alike rather than becoming another instrument of election-year political warfare. Congressional oversight and internal departmental reviews cannot substitute for an independent criminal investigation capable of compelling testimony, examining financial records, and pursuing charges wherever the evidence and law justify them. After years of evasions, institutional defensiveness, and repeated assurances that there is nothing more to investigate, the American people deserve an inquiry that follows the evidence without regard for political influence or professional reputation. The objective must be to determine exactly what happened, identify any criminal wrongdoing that remains prosecutable, and finally establish whether the institutions responsible for enforcing the law helped shield Jeffrey Epstein or others from accountability.



to contact me:


bobbbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>771epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-hugh-hefner-and-his-warning-about-jeffrey-epstein-10-31-26--76087830
The more troubling allegation is what happened afterward: according to the lawsuit, the FBI failed to meaningfully follow up on Christiansen’s allegations for roughly 15 years. The survivors contend that federal agents had been handed a direct warning about Epstein in 2005—the same year Palm Beach police began the investigation that eventually exposed his abuse of underage girls—yet Christiansen’s information effectively went nowhere. Her account is now being cited as part of a broader negligence case accusing the federal government of failing to act on early warnings that could have exposed Epstein’s trafficking operation much sooner. The allegations concerning Hefner and the FBI remain claims made in civil litigation rather than findings that have been proven at trial, but the documented timeline has added another potentially significant early warning to the history of law enforcement’s handling of Epstein.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76087830Sat, 31 Oct 2026 14:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciNewly surfaced court filings allege that Hugh Hefner warned the FBI about Jeffrey Epstein in 2005 after former Playboy Playmate Audra Christiansen told him she had been sexually abused and trafficked by Epstein. According to allegations contained in a...
The more troubling allegation is what happened afterward: according to the lawsuit, the FBI failed to meaningfully follow up on Christiansen’s allegations for roughly 15 years. The survivors contend that federal agents had been handed a direct warning about Epstein in 2005—the same year Palm Beach police began the investigation that eventually exposed his abuse of underage girls—yet Christiansen’s information effectively went nowhere. Her account is now being cited as part of a broader negligence case accusing the federal government of failing to act on early warnings that could have exposed Epstein’s trafficking operation much sooner. The allegations concerning Hefner and the FBI remain claims made in civil litigation rather than findings that have been proven at trial, but the documented timeline has added another potentially significant early warning to the history of law enforcement’s handling of Epstein.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3377epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-was-the-tip-of-the-human-trafficking-iceberg-10-31-26--76087829
Epstein and Maxwell therefore should be understood as part of a broader system of exploitation rather than as a bizarre exception completely detached from the rest of society. Their case showed how trafficking can operate behind respectable institutions, private homes, luxury properties and elite social networks just as easily as it can operate through street-level crime or organized criminal groups. It also demonstrated how money, reputation, secrecy and institutional failure can allow abuse to continue for years while victims struggle to be believed. Focusing exclusively on Epstein and Maxwell risks making the problem appear to begin and end with two notorious individuals, when human trafficking is sustained by a much wider ecosystem of recruiters, customers, facilitators, complicit institutions and people willing to ignore warning signs when confronting them would be inconvenient or costly.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76087829Sat, 31 Oct 2026 12:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell became two of the most notorious names associated with sexual exploitation and trafficking, but the crimes surrounding them existed within a much larger global problem. Human trafficking networks range from highly...
Epstein and Maxwell therefore should be understood as part of a broader system of exploitation rather than as a bizarre exception completely detached from the rest of society. Their case showed how trafficking can operate behind respectable institutions, private homes, luxury properties and elite social networks just as easily as it can operate through street-level crime or organized criminal groups. It also demonstrated how money, reputation, secrecy and institutional failure can allow abuse to continue for years while victims struggle to be believed. Focusing exclusively on Epstein and Maxwell risks making the problem appear to begin and end with two notorious individuals, when human trafficking is sustained by a much wider ecosystem of recruiters, customers, facilitators, complicit institutions and people willing to ignore warning signs when confronting them would be inconvenient or costly.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3222epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-worldwide-human-trafficking-problem-10-31-26--76087828
The true scale is almost certainly larger than official trafficking statistics indicate because these numbers largely measure victims who are actually identified by authorities rather than every person being exploited. The International Labour Organization estimates that 27.6 million people were trapped in forced labor on any given day in 2021, including millions subjected to forced commercial sexual exploitation, and that the total had increased by 2.7 million since 2016. Migrant workers face more than three times the risk of forced labor compared with non-migrant workers, while poverty, displacement, weak labor protections and the enormous profits available to traffickers continue to create conditions in which exploitation can flourish. Human trafficking has therefore not disappeared because notorious cases have been prosecuted; it remains an enormous international criminal economy that continually adapts to new technologies, migration patterns and economic vulnerabilities.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76087828Sat, 31 Oct 2026 10:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciHuman trafficking remains a massive and expanding global problem, with the latest international data showing increases in both identified victims and some of the most common forms of exploitation. The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime reported...
The true scale is almost certainly larger than official trafficking statistics indicate because these numbers largely measure victims who are actually identified by authorities rather than every person being exploited. The International Labour Organization estimates that 27.6 million people were trapped in forced labor on any given day in 2021, including millions subjected to forced commercial sexual exploitation, and that the total had increased by 2.7 million since 2016. Migrant workers face more than three times the risk of forced labor compared with non-migrant workers, while poverty, displacement, weak labor protections and the enormous profits available to traffickers continue to create conditions in which exploitation can flourish. Human trafficking has therefore not disappeared because notorious cases have been prosecuted; it remains an enormous international criminal economy that continually adapts to new technologies, migration patterns and economic vulnerabilities.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>4659epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-the-empire-too-big-for-rico-10-31-26--76087827
The consequences of that decision were enormous. A RICO investigation could have forced prosecutors to follow the entire structure instead of stopping with Epstein and, later, Ghislaine Maxwell: who recruited, who arranged travel, who handled payments, who controlled companies, who moved money, who provided logistical support and who knowingly helped the enterprise survive. It also could have opened a broader path toward conspiracy charges, forfeiture, financial tracing and accountability for people whose conduct might not fit neatly into a standalone sex-trafficking prosecution. Instead, authorities repeatedly narrowed the case, first in Florida and again after Epstein’s 2019 arrest, leaving the larger network substantially intact and much of its financial architecture unexplored in criminal court. Given the duration, organization and scale of Epstein’s operation, the absence of a serious racketeering prosecution looks less like prosecutorial caution and more like a catastrophic failure to use one of the most powerful tools available to dismantle an organized criminal enterprise.


to contact moe:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76087827Sat, 31 Oct 2026 08:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJeffrey Epstein’s operation had many of the characteristics prosecutors routinely examine in a RICO case: a long-running enterprise, multiple participants with distinct roles, repeated criminal conduct, interstate and international activity, financial...
The consequences of that decision were enormous. A RICO investigation could have forced prosecutors to follow the entire structure instead of stopping with Epstein and, later, Ghislaine Maxwell: who recruited, who arranged travel, who handled payments, who controlled companies, who moved money, who provided logistical support and who knowingly helped the enterprise survive. It also could have opened a broader path toward conspiracy charges, forfeiture, financial tracing and accountability for people whose conduct might not fit neatly into a standalone sex-trafficking prosecution. Instead, authorities repeatedly narrowed the case, first in Florida and again after Epstein’s 2019 arrest, leaving the larger network substantially intact and much of its financial architecture unexplored in criminal court. Given the duration, organization and scale of Epstein’s operation, the absence of a serious racketeering prosecution looks less like prosecutorial caution and more like a catastrophic failure to use one of the most powerful tools available to dismantle an organized criminal enterprise.


to contact moe:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3001epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-did-jamie-dimon-know-who-and-what-epstein-was-10-31-26--76087826
The questions surrounding Dimon intensified because internal JPMorgan records showed that Epstein was repeatedly discussed at high levels of the bank. Employees raised concerns about him for years, and in 2011 JPMorgan general counsel Stephen Cutler wrote to senior executives Mary Erdoes and Staley that Epstein was “not an honorable person” and should no longer be a client. Dimon testified that he was unaware of that warning at the time, but critics have argued that it strains credibility that a client as controversial and valuable as Epstein could remain inside JPMorgan for years while senior executives, compliance personnel and legal officials discussed the risks without the CEO ever being informed. None of that proves Dimon lied under oath, but the contradiction between his account, Staley’s testimony and the documentary record has fueled continuing allegations that Dimon knew more about Epstein’s status at the bank than he has publicly acknowledged.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76087826Sat, 31 Oct 2026 06:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciAllegations that JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon has not been fully truthful about what he knew regarding Jeffrey Epstein center largely on a direct contradiction between Dimon’s sworn testimony and that of former JPMorgan executive Jes Staley. During...
The questions surrounding Dimon intensified because internal JPMorgan records showed that Epstein was repeatedly discussed at high levels of the bank. Employees raised concerns about him for years, and in 2011 JPMorgan general counsel Stephen Cutler wrote to senior executives Mary Erdoes and Staley that Epstein was “not an honorable person” and should no longer be a client. Dimon testified that he was unaware of that warning at the time, but critics have argued that it strains credibility that a client as controversial and valuable as Epstein could remain inside JPMorgan for years while senior executives, compliance personnel and legal officials discussed the risks without the CEO ever being informed. None of that proves Dimon lied under oath, but the contradiction between his account, Staley’s testimony and the documentary record has fueled continuing allegations that Dimon knew more about Epstein’s status at the bank than he has publicly acknowledged.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2665epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/bradley-dawson-pleads-not-guilty-to-the-charges--76090271
Dawson continued denying responsibility throughout the proceedings, with his defense ultimately arguing that prosecutors had failed to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. During closing arguments in November 2024, defense attorney Anil Prasad questioned the reliability of witness testimony, highlighted alleged inconsistencies in the police investigation, and argued that Dawson had no physical injuries consistent with a violent confrontation. Prasad also challenged the prosecution's assertion that Dawson had intended to flee Fiji, pointing out that numerous personal belongings remained at the resort. The defense maintained that the circumstantial evidence was insufficient to prove murder, while prosecutors relied on Chen's extensive injuries, Dawson's statements, and his conduct immediately after her death. Following an eight-day trial involving fourteen witnesses, Justice Hamza rejected Dawson's defense and found him guilty of murder on December 11, 2024. The judge concluded that the evidence established beyond a reasonable doubt that Dawson had caused Chen's death and had either intended to kill her or acted recklessly regarding the fatal consequences of his conduct. Hamza also condemned Dawson for fleeing the scene and abandoning his severely injured wife without seeking medical assistance. On February 11, 2025, Dawson was sentenced to life imprisonment, with a minimum term of eighteen years before he could become eligible for consideration for release through the applicable Fijian legal process.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76090271Sat, 31 Oct 2026 04:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciBradley Robert Dawson, the Tennessee man accused of murdering his wife, Christe Chen, during their honeymoon at Fiji's exclusive Turtle Island Resort in July 2022, pleaded not guilty to one count of murder during a September 1, 2022, appearance before...
Dawson continued denying responsibility throughout the proceedings, with his defense ultimately arguing that prosecutors had failed to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. During closing arguments in November 2024, defense attorney Anil Prasad questioned the reliability of witness testimony, highlighted alleged inconsistencies in the police investigation, and argued that Dawson had no physical injuries consistent with a violent confrontation. Prasad also challenged the prosecution's assertion that Dawson had intended to flee Fiji, pointing out that numerous personal belongings remained at the resort. The defense maintained that the circumstantial evidence was insufficient to prove murder, while prosecutors relied on Chen's extensive injuries, Dawson's statements, and his conduct immediately after her death. Following an eight-day trial involving fourteen witnesses, Justice Hamza rejected Dawson's defense and found him guilty of murder on December 11, 2024. The judge concluded that the evidence established beyond a reasonable doubt that Dawson had caused Chen's death and had either intended to kill her or acted recklessly regarding the fatal consequences of his conduct. Hamza also condemned Dawson for fleeing the scene and abandoning his severely injured wife without seeking medical assistance. On February 11, 2025, Dawson was sentenced to life imprisonment, with a minimum term of eighteen years before he could become eligible for consideration for release through the applicable Fijian legal process.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>684breakingnews,coldcase,coldcases,disappeared,missing,missingpeople,missingpersons,news,newsupdate,talesofthemissing,thosewhohavevanished,truecrime,truecrimeaddict,truecrimecommunity,truecrimejunkie,truecrimeobsessed,truecrimepodcast,unsolvedmysteries,unsolvedmystery,vanishedtruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/bradley-dawson-and-the-honeymoon-murder-in-fiji--76090272









Bradley Robert Dawson is an American man from Memphis, Tennessee, who was convicted of brutally murdering his wife, Christe Chen, during their honeymoon at an exclusive resort in Fiji in July 2022. Dawson, who worked in information technology for a Memphis-based nonprofit organization, had married Chen, a 36-year-old pharmacist, earlier that year. The couple traveled to Fiji and checked into the luxurious Turtle Island Resort in the Yasawa Islands on July 7, 2022, but their honeymoon took a horrific turn just two days later. According to testimony presented during his trial, resort employees overheard the couple arguing before Chen was discovered dead inside their private bungalow on July 9. Investigators determined that she had suffered extensive blunt-force injuries to her head and body, leaving her so badly disfigured that her remains could not be embalmed for transportation back to the United States. Following the attack, Dawson fled the resort in a kayak and traveled to a neighboring island, where authorities eventually located and arrested him with his passport and personal belongings. Prosecutors argued that Dawson's actions demonstrated his intention to escape responsibility for the killing, while the severe nature of Chen's injuries provided compelling evidence of the violence inflicted upon her.

Dawson maintained his innocence and pleaded not guilty to murder, with his defense attorneys arguing that prosecutors lacked sufficient evidence to establish that he was responsible for Chen's death. However, following an eight-day trial involving testimony from fourteen witnesses, Justice Riyaz Hamza of Fiji's Lautoka High Court rejected the defense's arguments and found Dawson guilty of murder on December 11, 2024. The judge concluded that the prosecution had proven beyond a reasonable doubt that Dawson caused his wife's death and had either intended to kill her or acted with reckless disregard for whether his conduct would prove fatal. Hamza also determined that Dawson's decision to flee the resort while leaving his gravely injured wife behind demonstrated an appalling disregard for her life. On February 11, 2025, Dawson was sentenced to life imprisonment, with a minimum term of eighteen years before he could be considered for a pardon or other form of release under Fijian law. The murder attracted international attention because of its extraordinary setting, the brutality of the attack, and the fact that it occurred almost immediately after the newlyweds arrived at one of Fiji's most exclusive honeymoon destinations. What was supposed to be a celebration of their marriage instead became a homicide investigation that ended with Dawson facing the prospect of spending the remainder of his life behind bars.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com







Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76090272Sat, 31 Oct 2026 02:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciBradley Robert Dawson is an American man from Memphis, Tennessee, who was convicted of brutally murdering his wife, Christe Chen, during their honeymoon at an exclusive resort in Fiji in July 2022. Dawson, who worked in information technology for a...









Bradley Robert Dawson is an American man from Memphis, Tennessee, who was convicted of brutally murdering his wife, Christe Chen, during their honeymoon at an exclusive resort in Fiji in July 2022. Dawson, who worked in information technology for a Memphis-based nonprofit organization, had married Chen, a 36-year-old pharmacist, earlier that year. The couple traveled to Fiji and checked into the luxurious Turtle Island Resort in the Yasawa Islands on July 7, 2022, but their honeymoon took a horrific turn just two days later. According to testimony presented during his trial, resort employees overheard the couple arguing before Chen was discovered dead inside their private bungalow on July 9. Investigators determined that she had suffered extensive blunt-force injuries to her head and body, leaving her so badly disfigured that her remains could not be embalmed for transportation back to the United States. Following the attack, Dawson fled the resort in a kayak and traveled to a neighboring island, where authorities eventually located and arrested him with his passport and personal belongings. Prosecutors argued that Dawson's actions demonstrated his intention to escape responsibility for the killing, while the severe nature of Chen's injuries provided compelling evidence of the violence inflicted upon her.

Dawson maintained his innocence and pleaded not guilty to murder, with his defense attorneys arguing that prosecutors lacked sufficient evidence to establish that he was responsible for Chen's death. However, following an eight-day trial involving testimony from fourteen witnesses, Justice Riyaz Hamza of Fiji's Lautoka High Court rejected the defense's arguments and found Dawson guilty of murder on December 11, 2024. The judge concluded that the prosecution had proven beyond a reasonable doubt that Dawson caused his wife's death and had either intended to kill her or acted with reckless disregard for whether his conduct would prove fatal. Hamza also determined that Dawson's decision to flee the resort while leaving his gravely injured wife behind demonstrated an appalling disregard for her life. On February 11, 2025, Dawson was sentenced to life imprisonment, with a minimum term of eighteen years before he could be considered for a pardon or other form of release under Fijian law. The murder attracted international attention because of its extraordinary setting, the brutality of the attack, and the fact that it occurred almost immediately after the newlyweds arrived at one of Fiji's most exclusive honeymoon destinations. What was supposed to be a celebration of their marriage instead became a homicide investigation that ended with Dawson facing the prospect of spending the remainder of his life behind bars.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com







Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>781breakingnews,buzzfeedunsolvedtruecrime,disappeared,news,truecrime,truecrimeaddict,truecrimeallthetime,truecrimeandchill,truecrimebooks,truecrimecommunity,truecrimefan,truecrimegarage,truecrimejunkie,truecrimeobsessed,truecrimepodcast,truecrimepodcasts,truecrimereport,truecrimes,truecrimestories,vanishedtruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-day-6-part-7-10-30-26--76087960
The defense concentrated much of its closing argument on the aggravating circumstance that could keep the aggravated-murder charge death-penalty eligible: whether the shooter knowingly created a great risk of death to someone other than Kirk. Attorney Staci Visser stressed that there had been one shot, one bullet and one person struck, arguing that prosecutors were stretching possible dangers—such as a miss, ricochet or pass-through bullet—into proof that another person had actually been placed within the legally required “zone of danger.” Richard Novak separately challenged the state’s evidence concerning political motivation and whether Robinson could reasonably have known children were present. Prosecutor Chad Grunander answered that argument by describing the shot as “ballistic roulette,” emphasizing that Kirk was surrounded by security personnel, a questioner and thousands of spectators and arguing that a slight error in aim could easily have killed someone else. The fundamental dispute at closing was therefore not simply whether the state could identify Robinson as the alleged shooter, but whether prosecutors had established the aggravating circumstances and enhancements necessary to carry the entire case—including its potential death penalty—forward to trial.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76087960Sat, 31 Oct 2026 00:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay six of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing, held September 1, 2026, centered on closing arguments and the prosecution’s claim that the evidence easily cleared Utah’s probable-cause standard. Deputy Utah County Attorney Ryan McBride argued that...
The defense concentrated much of its closing argument on the aggravating circumstance that could keep the aggravated-murder charge death-penalty eligible: whether the shooter knowingly created a great risk of death to someone other than Kirk. Attorney Staci Visser stressed that there had been one shot, one bullet and one person struck, arguing that prosecutors were stretching possible dangers—such as a miss, ricochet or pass-through bullet—into proof that another person had actually been placed within the legally required “zone of danger.” Richard Novak separately challenged the state’s evidence concerning political motivation and whether Robinson could reasonably have known children were present. Prosecutor Chad Grunander answered that argument by describing the shot as “ballistic roulette,” emphasizing that Kirk was surrounded by security personnel, a questioner and thousands of spectators and arguing that a slight error in aim could easily have killed someone else. The fundamental dispute at closing was therefore not simply whether the state could identify Robinson as the alleged shooter, but whether prosecutors had established the aggravating circumstances and enhancements necessary to carry the entire case—including its potential death penalty—forward to trial.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>706breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-day-6-part-6-10-30-26--76087961
The defense concentrated much of its closing argument on the aggravating circumstance that could keep the aggravated-murder charge death-penalty eligible: whether the shooter knowingly created a great risk of death to someone other than Kirk. Attorney Staci Visser stressed that there had been one shot, one bullet and one person struck, arguing that prosecutors were stretching possible dangers—such as a miss, ricochet or pass-through bullet—into proof that another person had actually been placed within the legally required “zone of danger.” Richard Novak separately challenged the state’s evidence concerning political motivation and whether Robinson could reasonably have known children were present. Prosecutor Chad Grunander answered that argument by describing the shot as “ballistic roulette,” emphasizing that Kirk was surrounded by security personnel, a questioner and thousands of spectators and arguing that a slight error in aim could easily have killed someone else. The fundamental dispute at closing was therefore not simply whether the state could identify Robinson as the alleged shooter, but whether prosecutors had established the aggravating circumstances and enhancements necessary to carry the entire case—including its potential death penalty—forward to trial.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76087961Fri, 30 Oct 2026 22:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay six of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing, held September 1, 2026, centered on closing arguments and the prosecution’s claim that the evidence easily cleared Utah’s probable-cause standard. Deputy Utah County Attorney Ryan McBride argued that...
The defense concentrated much of its closing argument on the aggravating circumstance that could keep the aggravated-murder charge death-penalty eligible: whether the shooter knowingly created a great risk of death to someone other than Kirk. Attorney Staci Visser stressed that there had been one shot, one bullet and one person struck, arguing that prosecutors were stretching possible dangers—such as a miss, ricochet or pass-through bullet—into proof that another person had actually been placed within the legally required “zone of danger.” Richard Novak separately challenged the state’s evidence concerning political motivation and whether Robinson could reasonably have known children were present. Prosecutor Chad Grunander answered that argument by describing the shot as “ballistic roulette,” emphasizing that Kirk was surrounded by security personnel, a questioner and thousands of spectators and arguing that a slight error in aim could easily have killed someone else. The fundamental dispute at closing was therefore not simply whether the state could identify Robinson as the alleged shooter, but whether prosecutors had established the aggravating circumstances and enhancements necessary to carry the entire case—including its potential death penalty—forward to trial.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>862breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-epstein-investigation-why-an-independent-special-counsel-is-long-overdue-part-2-10-30-26--76087851
The special counsel should be an accomplished outsider with no professional or personal interest in protecting the Department of Justice, its former leadership, or the influential individuals connected to Epstein. Experienced criminal attorneys such as Marc Agnifilo, Alan Jackson, or Teny Geragos represent the caliber of legal talent worth considering, provided that a thorough conflict review establishes their independence. Such an investigation would require broad authority, adequate resources, experienced investigators, forensic accountants, and the ability to pursue credible evidence involving financial institutions, former prosecutors, government officials, and potential participants in Epstein's criminal operation. It must also remain independent of partisan political interests, scrutinizing conduct involving Republicans and Democrats alike rather than becoming another instrument of election-year political warfare. Congressional oversight and internal departmental reviews cannot substitute for an independent criminal investigation capable of compelling testimony, examining financial records, and pursuing charges wherever the evidence and law justify them. After years of evasions, institutional defensiveness, and repeated assurances that there is nothing more to investigate, the American people deserve an inquiry that follows the evidence without regard for political influence or professional reputation. The objective must be to determine exactly what happened, identify any criminal wrongdoing that remains prosecutable, and finally establish whether the institutions responsible for enforcing the law helped shield Jeffrey Epstein or others from accountability.



to contact me:


bobbbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76087851Fri, 30 Oct 2026 20:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciFor nearly two decades, the Jeffrey Epstein scandal has exposed profound failures within the American justice system, beginning with the controversial 2007 nonprosecution agreement that allowed Epstein to avoid federal prosecution despite an extensive...
The special counsel should be an accomplished outsider with no professional or personal interest in protecting the Department of Justice, its former leadership, or the influential individuals connected to Epstein. Experienced criminal attorneys such as Marc Agnifilo, Alan Jackson, or Teny Geragos represent the caliber of legal talent worth considering, provided that a thorough conflict review establishes their independence. Such an investigation would require broad authority, adequate resources, experienced investigators, forensic accountants, and the ability to pursue credible evidence involving financial institutions, former prosecutors, government officials, and potential participants in Epstein's criminal operation. It must also remain independent of partisan political interests, scrutinizing conduct involving Republicans and Democrats alike rather than becoming another instrument of election-year political warfare. Congressional oversight and internal departmental reviews cannot substitute for an independent criminal investigation capable of compelling testimony, examining financial records, and pursuing charges wherever the evidence and law justify them. After years of evasions, institutional defensiveness, and repeated assurances that there is nothing more to investigate, the American people deserve an inquiry that follows the evidence without regard for political influence or professional reputation. The objective must be to determine exactly what happened, identify any criminal wrongdoing that remains prosecutable, and finally establish whether the institutions responsible for enforcing the law helped shield Jeffrey Epstein or others from accountability.



to contact me:


bobbbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>714epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-epstein-investigation-why-an-independent-special-counsel-is-long-overdue-part-1-10-29-26--76087850
The special counsel should be an accomplished outsider with no professional or personal interest in protecting the Department of Justice, its former leadership, or the influential individuals connected to Epstein. Experienced criminal attorneys such as Marc Agnifilo, Alan Jackson, or Teny Geragos represent the caliber of legal talent worth considering, provided that a thorough conflict review establishes their independence. Such an investigation would require broad authority, adequate resources, experienced investigators, forensic accountants, and the ability to pursue credible evidence involving financial institutions, former prosecutors, government officials, and potential participants in Epstein's criminal operation. It must also remain independent of partisan political interests, scrutinizing conduct involving Republicans and Democrats alike rather than becoming another instrument of election-year political warfare. Congressional oversight and internal departmental reviews cannot substitute for an independent criminal investigation capable of compelling testimony, examining financial records, and pursuing charges wherever the evidence and law justify them. After years of evasions, institutional defensiveness, and repeated assurances that there is nothing more to investigate, the American people deserve an inquiry that follows the evidence without regard for political influence or professional reputation. The objective must be to determine exactly what happened, identify any criminal wrongdoing that remains prosecutable, and finally establish whether the institutions responsible for enforcing the law helped shield Jeffrey Epstein or others from accountability.



to contact me:


bobbbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76087850Fri, 30 Oct 2026 18:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciFor nearly two decades, the Jeffrey Epstein scandal has exposed profound failures within the American justice system, beginning with the controversial 2007 nonprosecution agreement that allowed Epstein to avoid federal prosecution despite an extensive...
The special counsel should be an accomplished outsider with no professional or personal interest in protecting the Department of Justice, its former leadership, or the influential individuals connected to Epstein. Experienced criminal attorneys such as Marc Agnifilo, Alan Jackson, or Teny Geragos represent the caliber of legal talent worth considering, provided that a thorough conflict review establishes their independence. Such an investigation would require broad authority, adequate resources, experienced investigators, forensic accountants, and the ability to pursue credible evidence involving financial institutions, former prosecutors, government officials, and potential participants in Epstein's criminal operation. It must also remain independent of partisan political interests, scrutinizing conduct involving Republicans and Democrats alike rather than becoming another instrument of election-year political warfare. Congressional oversight and internal departmental reviews cannot substitute for an independent criminal investigation capable of compelling testimony, examining financial records, and pursuing charges wherever the evidence and law justify them. After years of evasions, institutional defensiveness, and repeated assurances that there is nothing more to investigate, the American people deserve an inquiry that follows the evidence without regard for political influence or professional reputation. The objective must be to determine exactly what happened, identify any criminal wrongdoing that remains prosecutable, and finally establish whether the institutions responsible for enforcing the law helped shield Jeffrey Epstein or others from accountability.



to contact me:


bobbbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>901epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/epstein-survivors-take-their-case-against-former-usvi-officials-to-appeals-court-10-30-26--76087853
The appeal focuses heavily on Epstein's financial dealings with Virgin Islands officials and whether those transactions establish sufficient connections to New York to permit the lawsuit to proceed. The women allege that Epstein used his New York bank accounts to funnel money and benefits to politically influential individuals, including approximately $625,000 in tuition payments for the de Jongh family's children, campaign contributions, charitable donations, and a purported $50 million loan to the Virgin Islands government. They contend that these financial arrangements purchased political loyalty, government access, favorable treatment concerning sex-offender registration requirements, and influence over legislation that could have affected Epstein's activities. Their attorneys argue that the lower court misapplied New York jurisdictional law by failing to properly consider the alleged conspiracy and Epstein's role as a financial intermediary operating from New York. They also challenge the conclusion that Cecile de Jongh was protected by releases signed during earlier settlements, arguing that the claims against her concern alleged abuses of her political position as first lady rather than her employment by Epstein. The plaintiffs further maintain that the court prematurely dismissed the case without allowing jurisdictional discovery that could reveal additional communications, financial transactions and evidence of coordination among the defendants. They are asking the appeals court to reverse the dismissal and reinstate their amended complaint, potentially reopening litigation that could subject former Virgin Islands officials to extensive discovery concerning their relationships with Epstein. The defendants have not yet filed their responses to the appeal.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


Jane Does ask appeals court to revive Epstein-linked suit against VI government and former officials

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76087853Fri, 30 Oct 2026 16:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciSix women who accuse former U.S. Virgin Islands government officials of helping facilitate Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking operation are asking the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit to revive their dismissed federal lawsuit. The women,...
The appeal focuses heavily on Epstein's financial dealings with Virgin Islands officials and whether those transactions establish sufficient connections to New York to permit the lawsuit to proceed. The women allege that Epstein used his New York bank accounts to funnel money and benefits to politically influential individuals, including approximately $625,000 in tuition payments for the de Jongh family's children, campaign contributions, charitable donations, and a purported $50 million loan to the Virgin Islands government. They contend that these financial arrangements purchased political loyalty, government access, favorable treatment concerning sex-offender registration requirements, and influence over legislation that could have affected Epstein's activities. Their attorneys argue that the lower court misapplied New York jurisdictional law by failing to properly consider the alleged conspiracy and Epstein's role as a financial intermediary operating from New York. They also challenge the conclusion that Cecile de Jongh was protected by releases signed during earlier settlements, arguing that the claims against her concern alleged abuses of her political position as first lady rather than her employment by Epstein. The plaintiffs further maintain that the court prematurely dismissed the case without allowing jurisdictional discovery that could reveal additional communications, financial transactions and evidence of coordination among the defendants. They are asking the appeals court to reverse the dismissal and reinstate their amended complaint, potentially reopening litigation that could subject former Virgin Islands officials to extensive discovery concerning their relationships with Epstein. The defendants have not yet filed their responses to the appeal.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


Jane Does ask appeals court to revive Epstein-linked suit against VI government and former officials

Become a supporter of this podcast: 811epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/federal-appeals-court-rejects-doj-attempt-to-delay-review-of-foreign-language-epstein-files-10-30-26--76086612
The ruling represents another significant legal defeat for the Justice Department in its prolonged battle over compliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act, particularly because it concerns an entire category of potentially relevant evidence that federal officials acknowledged they never examined. Although the DOJ has not disclosed how many foreign-language documents remain unreviewed, survivors and advocacy organizations have suggested the total could reach hundreds of thousands, raising further questions about the department's earlier declarations that its work was finished. The appeals court also dismissed the government's argument that beginning the review could result in premature public disclosure, pointing out that the DOJ would only be required to release records it determined were legally subject to disclosure, while disputes over withheld material could still be litigated. Under Sullivan's September 21 order, both parties must submit a joint filing outlining the next steps within three days of the appellate decision. Importantly, the ruling does not immediately require the release of additional Epstein records, nor does it resolve the broader question of whether Phang can ultimately enforce the transparency law through her lawsuit. Nevertheless, it removes a major procedural obstacle that Blanche's Justice Department had attempted to place in front of the review process. For an administration that repeatedly insisted it had satisfied its obligations under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, the decision reinforces the growing legal scrutiny surrounding its handling of records that were supposed to have been examined and disclosed months earlier.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Federal Appeals Court Rejects Trump DOJ's Bid to Halt Epstein Files Review, Says Government Failed to Justify the Delay | IBTimes UK

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76086612Fri, 30 Oct 2026 14:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciA federal appeals court dealt another setback to Attorney General Todd Blanche and the Department of Justice on October 28, 2026, rejecting the government's attempt to halt a court-ordered review of foreign-language documents contained in the Jeffrey...
The ruling represents another significant legal defeat for the Justice Department in its prolonged battle over compliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act, particularly because it concerns an entire category of potentially relevant evidence that federal officials acknowledged they never examined. Although the DOJ has not disclosed how many foreign-language documents remain unreviewed, survivors and advocacy organizations have suggested the total could reach hundreds of thousands, raising further questions about the department's earlier declarations that its work was finished. The appeals court also dismissed the government's argument that beginning the review could result in premature public disclosure, pointing out that the DOJ would only be required to release records it determined were legally subject to disclosure, while disputes over withheld material could still be litigated. Under Sullivan's September 21 order, both parties must submit a joint filing outlining the next steps within three days of the appellate decision. Importantly, the ruling does not immediately require the release of additional Epstein records, nor does it resolve the broader question of whether Phang can ultimately enforce the transparency law through her lawsuit. Nevertheless, it removes a major procedural obstacle that Blanche's Justice Department had attempted to place in front of the review process. For an administration that repeatedly insisted it had satisfied its obligations under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, the decision reinforces the growing legal scrutiny surrounding its handling of records that were supposed to have been examined and disclosed months earlier.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Federal Appeals Court Rejects Trump DOJ's Bid to Halt Epstein Files Review, Says Government Failed to Justify the Delay | IBTimes UK

Become a supporter of this podcast: 647epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/protester-interrupts-trump-rally-with-questions-about-epstein-10-30-26--76085283
The confrontation also brought renewed attention to allegations contained in FBI interview records involving an unidentified woman who accused Trump of sexually assaulting her as a minor during an encounter allegedly arranged by Epstein. According to the woman's statements to investigators in 2019, Epstein introduced her to Trump in New York or New Jersey sometime in the early 1980s, when she was between 13 and 15 years old. She alleged that Trump sexually assaulted her during the encounter, although investigators have not publicly established the credibility of those allegations, and the timeline raises significant questions because there is no established evidence that Trump and Epstein knew each other as early as 1983. Trump has consistently denied wrongdoing, while the Justice Department has characterized some allegations submitted to the FBI as false and sensationalized. The renewed scrutiny comes at a particularly difficult political moment for the administration, with Republicans facing growing concerns about the economy, inflation and the war in Iran. A Reuters/Ipsos survey cited in the coverage placed Trump's approval rating at 32 percent and showed Democrats leading Republicans among likely voters on the generic congressional ballot. With the midterm elections approaching, the confrontation underscored the continuing political consequences of Trump's Epstein association and the difficulty his administration has faced in putting the controversy behind it.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Trump insists he 'kicked Epstein the hell out of Mar-a-Lago' after speech is derailed by protesters in Ohio | Daily Mail Online

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76085283Fri, 30 Oct 2026 12:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciPresident Donald Trump was confronted about his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein during an October 28, 2026, campaign rally in Chillicothe, Ohio, when a protester interrupted his speech by shouting that Trump had flown aboard Epstein’s private plane....
The confrontation also brought renewed attention to allegations contained in FBI interview records involving an unidentified woman who accused Trump of sexually assaulting her as a minor during an encounter allegedly arranged by Epstein. According to the woman's statements to investigators in 2019, Epstein introduced her to Trump in New York or New Jersey sometime in the early 1980s, when she was between 13 and 15 years old. She alleged that Trump sexually assaulted her during the encounter, although investigators have not publicly established the credibility of those allegations, and the timeline raises significant questions because there is no established evidence that Trump and Epstein knew each other as early as 1983. Trump has consistently denied wrongdoing, while the Justice Department has characterized some allegations submitted to the FBI as false and sensationalized. The renewed scrutiny comes at a particularly difficult political moment for the administration, with Republicans facing growing concerns about the economy, inflation and the war in Iran. A Reuters/Ipsos survey cited in the coverage placed Trump's approval rating at 32 percent and showed Democrats leading Republicans among likely voters on the generic congressional ballot. With the midterm elections approaching, the confrontation underscored the continuing political consequences of Trump's Epstein association and the difficulty his administration has faced in putting the controversy behind it.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Trump insists he 'kicked Epstein the hell out of Mar-a-Lago' after speech is derailed by protesters in Ohio | Daily Mail Online

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1007epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-impact-of-od-deaths-on-the-family-and-friends-left-behind-10-29-26--76076287
Compounding that suffering is the stigma surrounding addiction and overdose deaths, which can isolate grieving families at precisely the moment when they most desperately need compassion and support. While families mourning deaths from cancer, accidents, or other medical conditions are often met with sympathy, those who lose someone to an overdose may encounter judgment, uncomfortable silence, or cruel suggestions that the deceased somehow brought their death upon themselves. Some families conceal the cause of death entirely, fearing that revealing the circumstances will change how their loved one is remembered or how surviving relatives are treated within their communities. That silence can make the grieving process even more difficult, preventing people from openly discussing their loss and leaving them without the support networks that ordinarily help families navigate tragedy. Beyond the emotional consequences, overdose deaths frequently create enormous practical burdens, including funeral expenses, lost household income, outstanding medical bills, custody disputes, and the responsibility of raising children left without one or both parents. Marriages and family relationships can fracture under the weight of unresolved anger and conflicting interpretations of what happened, while surviving relatives may become excessively fearful about the safety of other loved ones. Anniversaries, birthdays, holidays, and ordinary reminders can reopen wounds long after the initial shock has subsided, reinforcing the reality that the consequences of an overdose extend far beyond the moment of death. For many families, one of the most painful aspects is watching the person they loved become defined almost exclusively by their addiction, as though the circumstances of their death somehow erased their personality, accomplishments, relationships, and everything else that made them human. Behind every fatal overdose is an entire network of people whose lives are permanently changed, people who must continue living with the empty chair at the dinner table, the unanswered telephone, and the knowledge that someone who once occupied an irreplaceable place in their world will never return. The devastating reality of the overdose crisis is that its toll cannot be measured solely by the number of people who die, because every one of those deaths leaves behind survivors carrying emotional and psychological consequences that can last the rest of their lives.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76076287Fri, 30 Oct 2026 10:36:09 +0000Bobby CapucciThe death of a loved one from a drug overdose leaves behind a devastating trail of grief, guilt, anger, and unanswered questions that can fundamentally alter the lives of everyone who knew them. For parents, siblings, spouses, children, and close...
Compounding that suffering is the stigma surrounding addiction and overdose deaths, which can isolate grieving families at precisely the moment when they most desperately need compassion and support. While families mourning deaths from cancer, accidents, or other medical conditions are often met with sympathy, those who lose someone to an overdose may encounter judgment, uncomfortable silence, or cruel suggestions that the deceased somehow brought their death upon themselves. Some families conceal the cause of death entirely, fearing that revealing the circumstances will change how their loved one is remembered or how surviving relatives are treated within their communities. That silence can make the grieving process even more difficult, preventing people from openly discussing their loss and leaving them without the support networks that ordinarily help families navigate tragedy. Beyond the emotional consequences, overdose deaths frequently create enormous practical burdens, including funeral expenses, lost household income, outstanding medical bills, custody disputes, and the responsibility of raising children left without one or both parents. Marriages and family relationships can fracture under the weight of unresolved anger and conflicting interpretations of what happened, while surviving relatives may become excessively fearful about the safety of other loved ones. Anniversaries, birthdays, holidays, and ordinary reminders can reopen wounds long after the initial shock has subsided, reinforcing the reality that the consequences of an overdose extend far beyond the moment of death. For many families, one of the most painful aspects is watching the person they loved become defined almost exclusively by their addiction, as though the circumstances of their death somehow erased their personality, accomplishments,...]]>3000breakingnews,buzzfeedunsolvedtruecrime,news,truecrime,truecrimeaddict,truecrimeallthetime,truecrimeandchill,truecrimebooks,truecrimecommunity,truecrimefan,truecrimegarage,truecrimejunkie,truecrimeobsessed,truecrimepodcast,truecrimepodcasts,truecrimereport,truecrimes,truecrimestoriestruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-oceangate-disaster-10-30-26--76076289


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76076289Fri, 30 Oct 2026 08:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciOn June 18, 2023, the OceanGate submersible Titan suffered a catastrophic implosion while descending toward the wreckage of the RMS Titanic in the North Atlantic Ocean, killing all five people aboard and triggering an international investigation into...


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2977breakingnews,buzzfeedunsolvedtruecrime,news,truecrime,truecrimeaddict,truecrimeallthetime,truecrimeandchill,truecrimebooks,truecrimecommunity,truecrimefan,truecrimegarage,truecrimejunkie,truecrimeobsessed,truecrimepodcast,truecrimepodcasts,truecrimereport,truecrimes,truecrimestoriestruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-what-classifies-someone-as-a-serial-killer-10-29-26--76076288













The psychology behind serial murder remains one of the most disturbing and complicated subjects in criminology, with experts emphasizing that there is no single explanation for why certain individuals become serial killers. Criminologist Dr. Scott Bonn, forensic psychologist Dr. Louis Schlesinger, and criminal justice professor Dr. Katherine Ramsland explained that serial murder typically emerges from a complicated interaction of biological predispositions, psychological abnormalities, environmental influences, and personal experiences. While childhood abuse, neglect, bullying, head injuries, and dysfunctional family relationships can contribute to violent behavior, the experts stressed that none of these factors independently causes someone to become a serial killer. Millions of people experience severe childhood trauma without ever becoming violent criminals, demonstrating why simplistic explanations about abusive parents or traumatic events are inadequate. Psychopathy and antisocial personality traits can play important roles, particularly when individuals lack empathy, demonstrate manipulative tendencies, or become obsessed with power and domination. However, not all psychopaths become serial killers, and not all serial killers are psychopaths. Bonn described how some sexually motivated killers develop increasingly violent fantasies during adolescence, eventually associating sexual gratification with suffering, humiliation, and death. Over time, these fantasies can become increasingly elaborate and consuming, with some offenders eventually progressing from imagination to actual violence. Schlesinger suggested that major personal setbacks, including the loss of employment or romantic relationships, can sometimes precede the first murder, although the precise mechanisms that cause certain individuals to act on violent fantasies remain poorly understood. Ramsland emphasized that serial killers are not a psychologically uniform population, and their motives, backgrounds, mental states, and methods can differ dramatically.



The experts also examined why serial killers can appear completely ordinary to their families, coworkers, and communities while secretly committing horrific crimes. Bonn pointed to offenders such as Ted Bundy, John Wayne Gacy, and Dennis Rader as examples of individuals capable of maintaining seemingly respectable public identities while concealing extreme violence. He attributed this ability partly to psychological compartmentalization, which allows offenders to separate their criminal behavior from their everyday relationships and responsibilities without experiencing the internal conflict that most people would expect. Schlesinger challenged the popular portrayal of serial killers as brilliant criminal masterminds, explaining that many are relatively ordinary individuals without exceptional intelligence or professional accomplishments. The experts also distinguished sexually motivated serial murderers from offenders who kill repeatedly for financial gain, revenge, power, or other purposes, emphasizing that sexual gratification is not the driving force behind every series of murders. Schlesinger identified a collection of potential warning signs associated with sexually motivated killers, including pathological lying, animal cruelty, repeated fire-setting, voyeurism, sadistic fantasies, obsessive controlling behavior, and unprovoked attacks against women, although these behaviors are not reliable predictors of future serial murder on their own. Another troubling characteristic is that many offenders understand perfectly well that their actions are illegal and morally unacceptable, yet continue killing while taking elaborate precautions to avoid apprehension. Their efforts to conceal evidence, manipulate investigators, and maintain false identities demonstrate an awareness of wrongdoing, even when they appear incapable of genuine remorse. The discussion was framed around the July 2023 arrest of Rex Heuermann in connection with the Gilgo Beach murders, which renewed public interest in how apparently ordinary individuals can become suspects in extraordinarily brutal crimes. Ultimately, the experts agreed that serial murder cannot be explained by one psychological diagnosis, childhood experience, or personality characteristic, but instead results from a complex combination of influences that researchers still do not fully understand.





to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76076288Fri, 30 Oct 2026 06:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe psychology behind serial murder remains one of the most disturbing and complicated subjects in criminology, with experts emphasizing that there is no single explanation for why certain individuals become serial killers. Criminologist Dr. Scott...













The psychology behind serial murder remains one of the most disturbing and complicated subjects in criminology, with experts emphasizing that there is no single explanation for why certain individuals become serial killers. Criminologist Dr. Scott Bonn, forensic psychologist Dr. Louis Schlesinger, and criminal justice professor Dr. Katherine Ramsland explained that serial murder typically emerges from a complicated interaction of biological predispositions, psychological abnormalities, environmental influences, and personal experiences. While childhood abuse, neglect, bullying, head injuries, and dysfunctional family relationships can contribute to violent behavior, the experts stressed that none of these factors independently causes someone to become a serial killer. Millions of people experience severe childhood trauma without ever becoming violent criminals, demonstrating why simplistic explanations about abusive parents or traumatic events are inadequate. Psychopathy and antisocial personality traits can play important roles, particularly when individuals lack empathy, demonstrate manipulative tendencies, or become obsessed with power and domination. However, not all psychopaths become serial killers, and not all serial killers are psychopaths. Bonn described how some sexually motivated killers develop increasingly violent fantasies during adolescence, eventually associating sexual gratification with suffering, humiliation, and death. Over time, these fantasies can become increasingly elaborate and consuming, with some offenders eventually progressing from imagination to actual violence. Schlesinger suggested that major personal setbacks, including the loss of employment or romantic relationships, can sometimes precede the first murder, although the precise mechanisms that cause certain individuals to act on violent fantasies remain poorly understood. Ramsland emphasized that serial killers are not a psychologically uniform population, and their motives, backgrounds, mental states, and methods can differ dramatically.



The experts also examined why serial killers can appear completely ordinary to their families, coworkers, and communities while secretly committing horrific crimes. Bonn pointed to offenders such as Ted Bundy, John Wayne Gacy, and Dennis Rader as examples of individuals capable of maintaining seemingly respectable public identities while concealing extreme violence. He attributed this ability partly to psychological compartmentalization, which allows offenders to separate their criminal behavior from their everyday relationships and responsibilities without experiencing the internal conflict that most people would expect. Schlesinger challenged the popular portrayal of serial killers as brilliant criminal masterminds, explaining that many are relatively ordinary individuals without exceptional intelligence or professional accomplishments. The experts also distinguished sexually motivated serial murderers from offenders who kill repeatedly for financial gain, revenge, power, or other purposes, emphasizing that sexual gratification is not the driving force behind every series of murders. Schlesinger identified a collection of potential warning signs associated with sexually motivated killers, including pathological lying, animal cruelty, repeated fire-setting, voyeurism, sadistic fantasies, obsessive controlling behavior, and unprovoked attacks against women, although these behaviors are not reliable predictors of future serial murder on their own. Another troubling characteristic is that many offenders understand perfectly well that their actions are illegal and morally unacceptable, yet continue killing while taking elaborate precautions to avoid apprehension. Their efforts to conceal evidence, manipulate investigators, and maintain false identities demonstrate an awareness of wrongdoing, even...]]>2993breakingnews,buzzfeedunsolvedtruecrime,news,truecrime,truecrimeaddict,truecrimeallthetime,truecrimeandchill,truecrimebooks,truecrimecommunity,truecrimefan,truecrimegarage,truecrimejunkie,truecrimeobsessed,truecrimepodcast,truecrimepodcasts,truecrimereport,truecrimes,truecrimestoriestruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-disturbing-number-of-serial-killers-who-are-also-long-haul-truckers-according-to-the-fbi--76076160
According to the FBI, one of the biggest obstacles in investigating these murders is the fragmented nature of American law enforcement, which allows serial offenders to exploit jurisdictional boundaries and differences in investigative resources. A woman might disappear from a truck stop in Georgia, be murdered inside a tractor-trailer traveling through Tennessee, and have her body abandoned along a highway in Florida, leaving investigators in three separate states with pieces of the same crime and no immediate reason to connect them. The victims frequently have no identifiable relationship to the locations where their remains are discovered, while the crime scenes themselves may have traveled hundreds of miles before investigators even become aware that a murder has occurred. To address these problems, the FBI uses its Violent Criminal Apprehension Program, known as ViCAP, to compare homicide evidence, identify similarities between cases, and reconstruct the movements of suspected offenders using trucking logs, fuel receipts, toll records, and other documentation. Investigators have also relied on DNA evidence and forensic genealogy to identify victims and develop leads against potential killers. The bureau believes that some offenders deliberately target women who are unlikely to be reported missing immediately, particularly those experiencing homelessness, addiction, or sexual exploitation. Figliuzzi has warned that some of these murders remain unresolved decades after they occurred and that the nature of long-haul trucking can make identifying offenders exceptionally difficult. The broader concern is that certain serial killers have effectively turned America's interstate highway system into a vast hunting ground, using the anonymity of the road and the limitations of disconnected police investigations to remain undetected for years.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76076160Fri, 30 Oct 2026 04:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciThe FBI has identified long-haul trucking as an occupation that can provide serial killers with unusual opportunities to commit murders while avoiding detection, particularly because drivers routinely travel thousands of miles across multiple...
According to the FBI, one of the biggest obstacles in investigating these murders is the fragmented nature of American law enforcement, which allows serial offenders to exploit jurisdictional boundaries and differences in investigative resources. A woman might disappear from a truck stop in Georgia, be murdered inside a tractor-trailer traveling through Tennessee, and have her body abandoned along a highway in Florida, leaving investigators in three separate states with pieces of the same crime and no immediate reason to connect them. The victims frequently have no identifiable relationship to the locations where their remains are discovered, while the crime scenes themselves may have traveled hundreds of miles before investigators even become aware that a murder has occurred. To address these problems, the FBI uses its Violent Criminal Apprehension Program, known as ViCAP, to compare homicide evidence, identify similarities between cases, and reconstruct the movements of suspected offenders using trucking logs, fuel receipts, toll records, and other documentation. Investigators have also relied on DNA evidence and forensic genealogy to identify victims and develop leads against potential killers. The bureau believes that some offenders deliberately target women who are unlikely to be reported missing immediately, particularly those experiencing homelessness, addiction, or sexual exploitation. Figliuzzi has warned that some of these murders remain unresolved decades after they occurred and that the nature of long-haul trucking can make identifying offenders exceptionally difficult. The broader concern is that certain serial killers have effectively turned America's interstate highway system into a vast hunting ground, using the anonymity of the road and the limitations of disconnected police investigations to remain undetected for years.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>910breakingnews,buzzfeedunsolvedtruecrime,news,truecrime,truecrimeaddict,truecrimeallthetime,truecrimeandchill,truecrimebooks,truecrimecommunity,truecrimefan,truecrimegarage,truecrimejunkie,truecrimeobsessed,truecrimepodcast,truecrimepodcasts,truecrimereport,truecrimes,truecrimestoriestruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-abduction-and-murder-of-eliza-fletcher--76076159
The investigation into Fletcher's murder exposed disturbing details about Abston's criminal history and raised serious questions about failures within the criminal justice system. Abston had been released from prison in 2020 after serving a lengthy sentence for a previous kidnapping, and investigators subsequently connected him to the September 2021 kidnapping and rape of another woman in Memphis. In that earlier attack, Abston had abducted a woman at gunpoint, sexually assaulted her, and released her, but a lengthy delay in processing the victim's sexual assault evidence prevented authorities from identifying him before Fletcher was murdered. DNA evidence eventually linked him to that attack, resulting in separate criminal proceedings in which he was convicted and sentenced to 80 years in prison. The revelations fueled widespread criticism of Tennessee's backlog of sexual assault kits and prompted changes intended to strengthen oversight of forensic testing. Meanwhile, prosecutors charged Abston with first-degree murder, especially aggravated kidnapping, and additional offenses connected to Fletcher's death, initially preparing to seek the death penalty. However, on October 28, 2024, Abston pleaded guilty to first-degree murder and especially aggravated kidnapping, eliminating the need for a murder trial. Judge Lee Coffee sentenced him to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole, with the punishment to run consecutively to his sentence in the earlier rape case. Fletcher's murder devastated the Memphis community and generated national outrage, particularly because she had been targeted while engaging in an ordinary activity in a familiar neighborhood. Her death also became a focal point in broader discussions about violent repeat offenders, the processing of sexual assault evidence, and whether authorities had missed an opportunity to stop Abston before he murdered an innocent woman.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76076159Fri, 30 Oct 2026 02:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciOn September 2, 2022, 34-year-old Eliza “Liza” Fletcher, a kindergarten teacher at St. Mary's Episcopal School and mother of two, was abducted while taking her customary early-morning run near the University of Memphis in Tennessee. At approximately...
The investigation into Fletcher's murder exposed disturbing details about Abston's criminal history and raised serious questions about failures within the criminal justice system. Abston had been released from prison in 2020 after serving a lengthy sentence for a previous kidnapping, and investigators subsequently connected him to the September 2021 kidnapping and rape of another woman in Memphis. In that earlier attack, Abston had abducted a woman at gunpoint, sexually assaulted her, and released her, but a lengthy delay in processing the victim's sexual assault evidence prevented authorities from identifying him before Fletcher was murdered. DNA evidence eventually linked him to that attack, resulting in separate criminal proceedings in which he was convicted and sentenced to 80 years in prison. The revelations fueled widespread criticism of Tennessee's backlog of sexual assault kits and prompted changes intended to strengthen oversight of forensic testing. Meanwhile, prosecutors charged Abston with first-degree murder, especially aggravated kidnapping, and additional offenses connected to Fletcher's death, initially preparing to seek the death penalty. However, on October 28, 2024, Abston pleaded guilty to first-degree murder and especially aggravated kidnapping, eliminating the need for a murder trial. Judge Lee Coffee sentenced him to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole, with the punishment to run consecutively to his sentence in the earlier rape case. Fletcher's murder devastated the Memphis community and generated national outrage, particularly because she had been targeted while engaging in an ordinary activity in a familiar neighborhood. Her death also became a focal point in broader discussions about violent repeat offenders, the processing of sexual assault evidence, and whether authorities had missed an opportunity to stop Abston before he murdered an innocent woman.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: 661breakingnews,buzzfeedunsolvedtruecrime,news,truecrime,truecrimeaddict,truecrimeallthetime,truecrimeandchill,truecrimebooks,truecrimecommunity,truecrimefan,truecrimegarage,truecrimejunkie,truecrimeobsessed,truecrimepodcast,truecrimepodcasts,truecrimereport,truecrimes,truecrimestoriestruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-day-6-part-5-10-29-26--76056122
The defense concentrated much of its closing argument on the aggravating circumstance that could keep the aggravated-murder charge death-penalty eligible: whether the shooter knowingly created a great risk of death to someone other than Kirk. Attorney Staci Visser stressed that there had been one shot, one bullet and one person struck, arguing that prosecutors were stretching possible dangers—such as a miss, ricochet or pass-through bullet—into proof that another person had actually been placed within the legally required “zone of danger.” Richard Novak separately challenged the state’s evidence concerning political motivation and whether Robinson could reasonably have known children were present. Prosecutor Chad Grunander answered that argument by describing the shot as “ballistic roulette,” emphasizing that Kirk was surrounded by security personnel, a questioner and thousands of spectators and arguing that a slight error in aim could easily have killed someone else. The fundamental dispute at closing was therefore not simply whether the state could identify Robinson as the alleged shooter, but whether prosecutors had established the aggravating circumstances and enhancements necessary to carry the entire case—including its potential death penalty—forward to trial.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76056122Fri, 30 Oct 2026 00:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciDay six of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing, held September 1, 2026, centered on closing arguments and the prosecution’s claim that the evidence easily cleared Utah’s probable-cause standard. Deputy Utah County Attorney Ryan McBride argued that...
The defense concentrated much of its closing argument on the aggravating circumstance that could keep the aggravated-murder charge death-penalty eligible: whether the shooter knowingly created a great risk of death to someone other than Kirk. Attorney Staci Visser stressed that there had been one shot, one bullet and one person struck, arguing that prosecutors were stretching possible dangers—such as a miss, ricochet or pass-through bullet—into proof that another person had actually been placed within the legally required “zone of danger.” Richard Novak separately challenged the state’s evidence concerning political motivation and whether Robinson could reasonably have known children were present. Prosecutor Chad Grunander answered that argument by describing the shot as “ballistic roulette,” emphasizing that Kirk was surrounded by security personnel, a questioner and thousands of spectators and arguing that a slight error in aim could easily have killed someone else. The fundamental dispute at closing was therefore not simply whether the state could identify Robinson as the alleged shooter, but whether prosecutors had established the aggravating circumstances and enhancements necessary to carry the entire case—including its potential death penalty—forward to trial.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>697breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-day-6-part-4-10-29-26--76051154
The defense concentrated much of its closing argument on the aggravating circumstance that could keep the aggravated-murder charge death-penalty eligible: whether the shooter knowingly created a great risk of death to someone other than Kirk. Attorney Staci Visser stressed that there had been one shot, one bullet and one person struck, arguing that prosecutors were stretching possible dangers—such as a miss, ricochet or pass-through bullet—into proof that another person had actually been placed within the legally required “zone of danger.” Richard Novak separately challenged the state’s evidence concerning political motivation and whether Robinson could reasonably have known children were present. Prosecutor Chad Grunander answered that argument by describing the shot as “ballistic roulette,” emphasizing that Kirk was surrounded by security personnel, a questioner and thousands of spectators and arguing that a slight error in aim could easily have killed someone else. The fundamental dispute at closing was therefore not simply whether the state could identify Robinson as the alleged shooter, but whether prosecutors had established the aggravating circumstances and enhancements necessary to carry the entire case—including its potential death penalty—forward to trial.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76051154Thu, 29 Oct 2026 22:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay six of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing, held September 1, 2026, centered on closing arguments and the prosecution’s claim that the evidence easily cleared Utah’s probable-cause standard. Deputy Utah County Attorney Ryan McBride argued that...
The defense concentrated much of its closing argument on the aggravating circumstance that could keep the aggravated-murder charge death-penalty eligible: whether the shooter knowingly created a great risk of death to someone other than Kirk. Attorney Staci Visser stressed that there had been one shot, one bullet and one person struck, arguing that prosecutors were stretching possible dangers—such as a miss, ricochet or pass-through bullet—into proof that another person had actually been placed within the legally required “zone of danger.” Richard Novak separately challenged the state’s evidence concerning political motivation and whether Robinson could reasonably have known children were present. Prosecutor Chad Grunander answered that argument by describing the shot as “ballistic roulette,” emphasizing that Kirk was surrounded by security personnel, a questioner and thousands of spectators and arguing that a slight error in aim could easily have killed someone else. The fundamental dispute at closing was therefore not simply whether the state could identify Robinson as the alleged shooter, but whether prosecutors had established the aggravating circumstances and enhancements necessary to carry the entire case—including its potential death penalty—forward to trial.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>701breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-house-judiciary-democrats-53-page-trump-epstein-report-part-8-10-29-26--76055548
The second half of the report is just as focused on the Justice Department as it is on Trump, accusing DOJ and FBI leadership of deliberately shutting down meaningful investigation of Epstein’s remaining associates and withholding or excessively redacting records that could implicate politically powerful people. The report specifically targets Attorney General Todd Blanche, arguing that during his 2025 prison interview with Maxwell he repeatedly prevented her from discussing a survivor whose FBI account implicated Trump, and contends that Blanche’s conduct raises potential obstruction and witness-tampering questions. It further argues that DOJ’s declaration that there was insufficient evidence to investigate additional Epstein co-conspirators is impossible to reconcile with the material already in federal possession, while pointing to alleged failures to assist investigations in New Mexico and the United Kingdom. The report concludes that DOJ has an irreconcilable conflict of interest and calls for an independent special counsel empowered to investigate Trump as well as Epstein’s other potential accomplices and enablers, while sharing relevant evidence with state and foreign prosecutors. Its central contention is that the Epstein investigation was not exhausted because investigators ran out of evidence, but was curtailed despite evidence that, in the committee Democrats’ view, easily satisfies the federal threshold for opening additional criminal investigations.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

politico.com/f/?id=000001a1-7412-db5d-a7fb-f71f5f490002

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76055548Thu, 29 Oct 2026 20:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe House Judiciary Committee Democratic staff report argues that the publicly released Epstein records, FBI interviews, survivor accounts and congressional investigative material establish more than enough evidence to justify a renewed criminal...
The second half of the report is just as focused on the Justice Department as it is on Trump, accusing DOJ and FBI leadership of deliberately shutting down meaningful investigation of Epstein’s remaining associates and withholding or excessively redacting records that could implicate politically powerful people. The report specifically targets Attorney General Todd Blanche, arguing that during his 2025 prison interview with Maxwell he repeatedly prevented her from discussing a survivor whose FBI account implicated Trump, and contends that Blanche’s conduct raises potential obstruction and witness-tampering questions. It further argues that DOJ’s declaration that there was insufficient evidence to investigate additional Epstein co-conspirators is impossible to reconcile with the material already in federal possession, while pointing to alleged failures to assist investigations in New Mexico and the United Kingdom. The report concludes that DOJ has an irreconcilable conflict of interest and calls for an independent special counsel empowered to investigate Trump as well as Epstein’s other potential accomplices and enablers, while sharing relevant evidence with state and foreign prosecutors. Its central contention is that the Epstein investigation was not exhausted because investigators ran out of evidence, but was curtailed despite evidence that, in the committee Democrats’ view, easily satisfies the federal threshold for opening additional criminal investigations.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

politico.com/f/?id=000001a1-7412-db5d-a7fb-f71f5f490002

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>757epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-house-judiciary-democrats-53-page-trump-epstein-report-part-7-10-29-26--76055547
The second half of the report is just as focused on the Justice Department as it is on Trump, accusing DOJ and FBI leadership of deliberately shutting down meaningful investigation of Epstein’s remaining associates and withholding or excessively redacting records that could implicate politically powerful people. The report specifically targets Attorney General Todd Blanche, arguing that during his 2025 prison interview with Maxwell he repeatedly prevented her from discussing a survivor whose FBI account implicated Trump, and contends that Blanche’s conduct raises potential obstruction and witness-tampering questions. It further argues that DOJ’s declaration that there was insufficient evidence to investigate additional Epstein co-conspirators is impossible to reconcile with the material already in federal possession, while pointing to alleged failures to assist investigations in New Mexico and the United Kingdom. The report concludes that DOJ has an irreconcilable conflict of interest and calls for an independent special counsel empowered to investigate Trump as well as Epstein’s other potential accomplices and enablers, while sharing relevant evidence with state and foreign prosecutors. Its central contention is that the Epstein investigation was not exhausted because investigators ran out of evidence, but was curtailed despite evidence that, in the committee Democrats’ view, easily satisfies the federal threshold for opening additional criminal investigations.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

politico.com/f/?id=000001a1-7412-db5d-a7fb-f71f5f490002

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76055547Thu, 29 Oct 2026 18:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe House Judiciary Committee Democratic staff report argues that the publicly released Epstein records, FBI interviews, survivor accounts and congressional investigative material establish more than enough evidence to justify a renewed criminal...
The second half of the report is just as focused on the Justice Department as it is on Trump, accusing DOJ and FBI leadership of deliberately shutting down meaningful investigation of Epstein’s remaining associates and withholding or excessively redacting records that could implicate politically powerful people. The report specifically targets Attorney General Todd Blanche, arguing that during his 2025 prison interview with Maxwell he repeatedly prevented her from discussing a survivor whose FBI account implicated Trump, and contends that Blanche’s conduct raises potential obstruction and witness-tampering questions. It further argues that DOJ’s declaration that there was insufficient evidence to investigate additional Epstein co-conspirators is impossible to reconcile with the material already in federal possession, while pointing to alleged failures to assist investigations in New Mexico and the United Kingdom. The report concludes that DOJ has an irreconcilable conflict of interest and calls for an independent special counsel empowered to investigate Trump as well as Epstein’s other potential accomplices and enablers, while sharing relevant evidence with state and foreign prosecutors. Its central contention is that the Epstein investigation was not exhausted because investigators ran out of evidence, but was curtailed despite evidence that, in the committee Democrats’ view, easily satisfies the federal threshold for opening additional criminal investigations.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

politico.com/f/?id=000001a1-7412-db5d-a7fb-f71f5f490002

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>692epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-house-judiciary-democrats-53-page-trump-epstein-report-part-6-10-29-26--76055545
The second half of the report is just as focused on the Justice Department as it is on Trump, accusing DOJ and FBI leadership of deliberately shutting down meaningful investigation of Epstein’s remaining associates and withholding or excessively redacting records that could implicate politically powerful people. The report specifically targets Attorney General Todd Blanche, arguing that during his 2025 prison interview with Maxwell he repeatedly prevented her from discussing a survivor whose FBI account implicated Trump, and contends that Blanche’s conduct raises potential obstruction and witness-tampering questions. It further argues that DOJ’s declaration that there was insufficient evidence to investigate additional Epstein co-conspirators is impossible to reconcile with the material already in federal possession, while pointing to alleged failures to assist investigations in New Mexico and the United Kingdom. The report concludes that DOJ has an irreconcilable conflict of interest and calls for an independent special counsel empowered to investigate Trump as well as Epstein’s other potential accomplices and enablers, while sharing relevant evidence with state and foreign prosecutors. Its central contention is that the Epstein investigation was not exhausted because investigators ran out of evidence, but was curtailed despite evidence that, in the committee Democrats’ view, easily satisfies the federal threshold for opening additional criminal investigations.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

politico.com/f/?id=000001a1-7412-db5d-a7fb-f71f5f490002

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76055545Thu, 29 Oct 2026 16:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe House Judiciary Committee Democratic staff report argues that the publicly released Epstein records, FBI interviews, survivor accounts and congressional investigative material establish more than enough evidence to justify a renewed criminal...
The second half of the report is just as focused on the Justice Department as it is on Trump, accusing DOJ and FBI leadership of deliberately shutting down meaningful investigation of Epstein’s remaining associates and withholding or excessively redacting records that could implicate politically powerful people. The report specifically targets Attorney General Todd Blanche, arguing that during his 2025 prison interview with Maxwell he repeatedly prevented her from discussing a survivor whose FBI account implicated Trump, and contends that Blanche’s conduct raises potential obstruction and witness-tampering questions. It further argues that DOJ’s declaration that there was insufficient evidence to investigate additional Epstein co-conspirators is impossible to reconcile with the material already in federal possession, while pointing to alleged failures to assist investigations in New Mexico and the United Kingdom. The report concludes that DOJ has an irreconcilable conflict of interest and calls for an independent special counsel empowered to investigate Trump as well as Epstein’s other potential accomplices and enablers, while sharing relevant evidence with state and foreign prosecutors. Its central contention is that the Epstein investigation was not exhausted because investigators ran out of evidence, but was curtailed despite evidence that, in the committee Democrats’ view, easily satisfies the federal threshold for opening additional criminal investigations.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

politico.com/f/?id=000001a1-7412-db5d-a7fb-f71f5f490002

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>652epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/cbs-news-investigation-reveals-significant-gaps-in-epstein-files-release-10-29-26--76055549
A separate examination of the Epstein files reveals extensive gaps in the government's document production, including missing financial records, bank transactions and potentially enormous numbers of emails involving Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Lesley Groff and other associates. By comparing the original identifying numbers assigned to documents during federal investigations with the numbering system used for the public release, investigators identified tens of thousands of apparent missing pages in previously assembled evidence collections. One sequence containing approximately 4,500 images of checks drawn on Epstein's accounts showed 66 missing check images, while a separate examination of email records uncovered numbering gaps totaling approximately 1.2 million pages. Although some omissions could reflect duplicate documents, administrative errors or legitimate withholding decisions, the Justice Department has failed to provide a comprehensive accounting that would allow the public to determine precisely what was removed and why. Former federal prosecutor Barbara McQuade questioned the disappearance of financial records, noting that they were not an authorized category for wholesale exclusion under the transparency law. The findings add weight to ongoing litigation brought by journalist Katie Phang, who is seeking additional disclosures and an independent special master to review the government's handling of the files. With significant portions of Epstein's financial and communications records still unaccounted for, the discrepancies intensify scrutiny of a Justice Department that continues to insist it has fulfilled its disclosure obligations without providing the documentation necessary to independently verify that claim.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Classified material missing from Epstein files, documents suggest - CBS News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76055549Thu, 29 Oct 2026 14:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciNewly released Justice Department records raise serious questions about Attorney General Todd Blanche’s repeated assertions that no classified national security material was withheld from the Jeffrey Epstein files. Documents included in the...
A separate examination of the Epstein files reveals extensive gaps in the government's document production, including missing financial records, bank transactions and potentially enormous numbers of emails involving Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Lesley Groff and other associates. By comparing the original identifying numbers assigned to documents during federal investigations with the numbering system used for the public release, investigators identified tens of thousands of apparent missing pages in previously assembled evidence collections. One sequence containing approximately 4,500 images of checks drawn on Epstein's accounts showed 66 missing check images, while a separate examination of email records uncovered numbering gaps totaling approximately 1.2 million pages. Although some omissions could reflect duplicate documents, administrative errors or legitimate withholding decisions, the Justice Department has failed to provide a comprehensive accounting that would allow the public to determine precisely what was removed and why. Former federal prosecutor Barbara McQuade questioned the disappearance of financial records, noting that they were not an authorized category for wholesale exclusion under the transparency law. The findings add weight to ongoing litigation brought by journalist Katie Phang, who is seeking additional disclosures and an independent special master to review the government's handling of the files. With significant portions of Epstein's financial and communications records still unaccounted for, the discrepancies intensify scrutiny of a Justice Department that continues to insist it has fulfilled its disclosure obligations without providing the documentation necessary to independently verify that claim.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Classified material missing from Epstein files, documents suggest - CBS News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1438epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/did-todd-blanche-deliberately-keep-ghislaine-maxwell-from-discussing-donald-trump-10-29-26--76055546
The allegations against Blanche form part of a much broader accusation that the Trump administration has interfered with efforts to investigate Epstein’s associates and withheld potentially damaging information concerning the president. The Democratic staff report identifies allegations involving 11 women, including five who have directly accused Trump of rape or sexual assault in circumstances involving Epstein, and questions why the Justice Department has declared further prosecutions unwarranted while significant investigative material remains undisclosed. Among the records highlighted are FBI documents concerning allegations involving minors, a partially redacted 2009 communication contradicting Trump’s claim that he expelled Epstein from Mar-a-Lago, and evidence that federal authorities have withheld information sought by congressional investigators. The report also criticizes Blanche’s role in restricting access to Epstein-related records and the administration’s handling of the July 2025 memorandum announcing that no additional Epstein investigations were justified. House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Jamie Raskin is calling for an independent special counsel to investigate Epstein’s remaining potential co-conspirators and determine whether Justice Department officials improperly obstructed investigations or concealed evidence. Although the allegations of criminal interference have not been established in court, the disclosures place Blanche’s actions and the independence of the Justice Department’s Epstein investigation under renewed scrutiny.

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76055546Thu, 29 Oct 2026 12:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciA new report released by House Judiciary Committee Democrats on October 26, 2026, raises serious allegations about Attorney General Todd Blanche’s handling of his July 2025 interview with convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell, accusing him of...
The allegations against Blanche form part of a much broader accusation that the Trump administration has interfered with efforts to investigate Epstein’s associates and withheld potentially damaging information concerning the president. The Democratic staff report identifies allegations involving 11 women, including five who have directly accused Trump of rape or sexual assault in circumstances involving Epstein, and questions why the Justice Department has declared further prosecutions unwarranted while significant investigative material remains undisclosed. Among the records highlighted are FBI documents concerning allegations involving minors, a partially redacted 2009 communication contradicting Trump’s claim that he expelled Epstein from Mar-a-Lago, and evidence that federal authorities have withheld information sought by congressional investigators. The report also criticizes Blanche’s role in restricting access to Epstein-related records and the administration’s handling of the July 2025 memorandum announcing that no additional Epstein investigations were justified. House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Jamie Raskin is calling for an independent special counsel to investigate Epstein’s remaining potential co-conspirators and determine whether Justice Department officials improperly obstructed investigations or concealed evidence. Although the allegations of criminal interference have not been established in court, the disclosures place Blanche’s actions and the independence of the Justice Department’s Epstein investigation under renewed scrutiny.

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>836epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-sinaloa-cartel-and-their-world-wide-footprint-10-29-26--76053929
Australia and New Zealand have become especially attractive destinations for the Sinaloa Cartel because cocaine and methamphetamine command significantly higher prices than in North American and European markets. Rather than attempting to establish complete control over local distribution, the cartel has developed relationships with established criminal organizations, including outlaw motorcycle gangs, while using international shipping routes and intermediaries to transport drugs across the Pacific. A joint intelligence assessment by American, Australian and New Zealand law-enforcement agencies identified the Sinaloa Cartel and the Jalisco New Generation Cartel as major organizations expanding into the region, with cartel associates temporarily operating inside Australia and New Zealand to coordinate shipments. The organization has also expanded its methamphetamine production and distribution networks into parts of Europe and Africa, while maintaining relationships with Asian criminal groups involved in supplying precursor chemicals and laundering drug proceeds. This international expansion has allowed the Sinaloa Cartel to diversify its revenue streams and reduce its dependence on the American market, making the organization substantially more difficult to dismantle. Despite the arrests of major leaders, the seizure of billions of dollars in narcotics and years of coordinated international investigations, Sinaloa’s decentralized structure and relationships with established criminal networks have allowed its trafficking operations to endure across multiple continents.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76053929Thu, 29 Oct 2026 10:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe Sinaloa Cartel has evolved from a Mexican drug-trafficking organization into a sprawling international criminal enterprise with operations and partnerships extending across North America, South America, Europe, Africa, Asia and Australia. Under...
Australia and New Zealand have become especially attractive destinations for the Sinaloa Cartel because cocaine and methamphetamine command significantly higher prices than in North American and European markets. Rather than attempting to establish complete control over local distribution, the cartel has developed relationships with established criminal organizations, including outlaw motorcycle gangs, while using international shipping routes and intermediaries to transport drugs across the Pacific. A joint intelligence assessment by American, Australian and New Zealand law-enforcement agencies identified the Sinaloa Cartel and the Jalisco New Generation Cartel as major organizations expanding into the region, with cartel associates temporarily operating inside Australia and New Zealand to coordinate shipments. The organization has also expanded its methamphetamine production and distribution networks into parts of Europe and Africa, while maintaining relationships with Asian criminal groups involved in supplying precursor chemicals and laundering drug proceeds. This international expansion has allowed the Sinaloa Cartel to diversify its revenue streams and reduce its dependence on the American market, making the organization substantially more difficult to dismantle. Despite the arrests of major leaders, the seizure of billions of dollars in narcotics and years of coordinated international investigations, Sinaloa’s decentralized structure and relationships with established criminal networks have allowed its trafficking operations to endure across multiple continents.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2717breakingnews,buzzfeedunsolvedtruecrime,news,truecrime,truecrimeaddict,truecrimeallthetime,truecrimeandchill,truecrimebooks,truecrimecommunity,truecrimefan,truecrimegarage,truecrimejunkie,truecrimeobsessed,truecrimepodcast,truecrimepodcasts,truecrimereport,truecrimes,truecrimestoriestruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-donald-studey-and-the-claim-that-he-was-a-serial-killer-10-29-26--76053924
The allegations prompted an investigation involving the Fremont County Sheriff's Office, the Iowa Division of Criminal Investigation and the FBI, particularly after cadaver dogs indicated possible human remains at locations identified by Lucy. In December 2022, investigators conducted an extensive excavation of the property but announced that they had recovered no evidence supporting the existence of a mass burial site. Another forensic search in May 2025, involving cadaver dogs, ground-penetrating radar and forensic anthropologists, similarly failed to uncover human remains or additional wells. Lucy continued to insist that her accusations were true, while her sister Susan publicly disputed the allegations and maintained that their father was not a murderer. Additional allegations emerged from Studey's sister, Marilyn Kepler, and a man who claimed Studey had asked him to help move a woman's body in 1975. The controversy gained renewed attention in April 2026 with the release of the documentary series My Killer Father: The Green Hollow Murders, which examined the competing family accounts, suspicious deaths and continuing efforts to investigate the property. Despite the disturbing allegations and testimony from multiple individuals, no homicide has been conclusively attributed to Studey, and investigators have not recovered physical evidence establishing that the alleged serial murders occurred.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76053924Thu, 29 Oct 2026 08:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciDonald Dean Studey was an Iowa resident who became the subject of extraordinary allegations after his daughter, Lucy Studey-McKiddy, accused him of being a prolific serial killer responsible for murdering between 50 and 70 people over approximately...
The allegations prompted an investigation involving the Fremont County Sheriff's Office, the Iowa Division of Criminal Investigation and the FBI, particularly after cadaver dogs indicated possible human remains at locations identified by Lucy. In December 2022, investigators conducted an extensive excavation of the property but announced that they had recovered no evidence supporting the existence of a mass burial site. Another forensic search in May 2025, involving cadaver dogs, ground-penetrating radar and forensic anthropologists, similarly failed to uncover human remains or additional wells. Lucy continued to insist that her accusations were true, while her sister Susan publicly disputed the allegations and maintained that their father was not a murderer. Additional allegations emerged from Studey's sister, Marilyn Kepler, and a man who claimed Studey had asked him to help move a woman's body in 1975. The controversy gained renewed attention in April 2026 with the release of the documentary series My Killer Father: The Green Hollow Murders, which examined the competing family accounts, suspicious deaths and continuing efforts to investigate the property. Despite the disturbing allegations and testimony from multiple individuals, no homicide has been conclusively attributed to Studey, and investigators have not recovered physical evidence establishing that the alleged serial murders occurred.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3462breakingnews,buzzfeedunsolvedtruecrime,news,truecrime,truecrimeaddict,truecrimeallthetime,truecrimeandchill,truecrimebooks,truecrimecommunity,truecrimefan,truecrimegarage,truecrimejunkie,truecrimeobsessed,truecrimepodcast,truecrimepodcasts,truecrimereport,truecrimes,truecrimestoriestruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-city-of-seattle-and-the-breakdown-of-the-system-10-28-26--76053925
At the same time, Seattle firefighters and emergency medical personnel were confronting an increasingly dangerous environment while responding to calls for assistance. Seattle Fire Department records documented 135 reports of assaults, threats and verbal abuse against firefighters in 2022, compared with just 13 reports in 2021, although the department acknowledged that a new reporting system likely accounted for some of the dramatic increase. Firefighters described being punched, kicked, slapped, threatened with knives and firearms, and attacked by individuals they had been dispatched to help. One incident involved a woman threatening firefighters with a knife, while another involved a patient who regained consciousness and immediately attacked the firefighter treating him. Fire officials pointed to the growing number of overdose responses, behavioral health emergencies and increasingly unpredictable encounters as significant contributors to the dangers facing emergency personnel. By 2023, firefighter union representatives reported more than 50 attacks over a six-month period, prompting demands for stronger legal protections, improved police coordination and additional safety measures. The Seattle City Council subsequently approved legislation strengthening protections for firefighters and emergency responders. Together, the sexual assault investigation backlog and the violence directed at emergency personnel exposed serious weaknesses in Seattle's public safety infrastructure, with victims waiting for investigations while the people responding to emergencies increasingly faced threats to their own safety.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76053925Thu, 29 Oct 2026 06:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciSeattle faced a serious public safety crisis in 2022 when revelations emerged that the Seattle Police Department had allowed sexual assault investigations to accumulate while its specialized detective unit struggled with severe staffing shortages. An...
At the same time, Seattle firefighters and emergency medical personnel were confronting an increasingly dangerous environment while responding to calls for assistance. Seattle Fire Department records documented 135 reports of assaults, threats and verbal abuse against firefighters in 2022, compared with just 13 reports in 2021, although the department acknowledged that a new reporting system likely accounted for some of the dramatic increase. Firefighters described being punched, kicked, slapped, threatened with knives and firearms, and attacked by individuals they had been dispatched to help. One incident involved a woman threatening firefighters with a knife, while another involved a patient who regained consciousness and immediately attacked the firefighter treating him. Fire officials pointed to the growing number of overdose responses, behavioral health emergencies and increasingly unpredictable encounters as significant contributors to the dangers facing emergency personnel. By 2023, firefighter union representatives reported more than 50 attacks over a six-month period, prompting demands for stronger legal protections, improved police coordination and additional safety measures. The Seattle City Council subsequently approved legislation strengthening protections for firefighters and emergency responders. Together, the sexual assault investigation backlog and the violence directed at emergency personnel exposed serious weaknesses in Seattle's public safety infrastructure, with victims waiting for investigations while the people responding to emergencies increasingly faced threats to their own safety.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3397breakingnews,buzzfeedunsolvedtruecrime,news,truecrime,truecrimeaddict,truecrimeallthetime,truecrimeandchill,truecrimebooks,truecrimecommunity,truecrimefan,truecrimegarage,truecrimejunkie,truecrimeobsessed,truecrimepodcast,truecrimepodcasts,truecrimereport,truecrimes,truecrimestoriestruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/more-on-the-alleged-serial-killer-in-austin--76053912
Investigators released surveillance footage showing Rivera walking with an unidentified man shortly before her death and asked the public to help identify him. Police described the person of interest as a short Hispanic man but acknowledged that they had not established his identity or conclusively determined whether he was the killer. The DNA profile recovered from the crime scenes failed to produce a match in the FBI's national criminal DNA database, leaving investigators without an identified suspect despite strong forensic evidence linking the two murders. Authorities also acknowledged the possibility that the individual could be responsible for additional killings, although they had not connected him to any other cases. Police emphasized that the investigation was separate from the widely publicized speculation surrounding a possible serial killer responsible for bodies discovered in Austin's Lady Bird Lake. The Austin Police Department and Bastrop County Sheriff's Office continued working together to identify the suspect and determine whether the two murders represented the full extent of his crimes.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76053912Thu, 29 Oct 2026 04:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciAuthorities in Austin, Texas, launched a search for a suspected serial killer in August 2024 after DNA evidence connected the murders of two women killed six years apart. The investigation centered on 34-year-old Alyssa Ann Rivera, whose body was...
Investigators released surveillance footage showing Rivera walking with an unidentified man shortly before her death and asked the public to help identify him. Police described the person of interest as a short Hispanic man but acknowledged that they had not established his identity or conclusively determined whether he was the killer. The DNA profile recovered from the crime scenes failed to produce a match in the FBI's national criminal DNA database, leaving investigators without an identified suspect despite strong forensic evidence linking the two murders. Authorities also acknowledged the possibility that the individual could be responsible for additional killings, although they had not connected him to any other cases. Police emphasized that the investigation was separate from the widely publicized speculation surrounding a possible serial killer responsible for bodies discovered in Austin's Lady Bird Lake. The Austin Police Department and Bastrop County Sheriff's Office continued working together to identify the suspect and determine whether the two murders represented the full extent of his crimes.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>649breakingnews,buzzfeedunsolvedtruecrime,news,truecrime,truecrimeaddict,truecrimeallthetime,truecrimeandchill,truecrimebooks,truecrimecommunity,truecrimefan,truecrimegarage,truecrimejunkie,truecrimeobsessed,truecrimepodcast,truecrimepodcasts,truecrimereport,truecrimes,truecrimestoriestruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/lady-bird-lake-and-the-fear-of-a-serial-killer-in-austin--76053911
Austin police rejected suggestions that the deaths were connected to a serial killer, maintaining that investigators had uncovered no evidence of foul play or a common perpetrator. Authorities explained that the circumstances, locations and characteristics of the victims varied and that medical examinations had not identified injuries suggesting homicide in the drowning cases. Investigators instead pointed to the combination of alcohol consumption, poorly illuminated waterfront areas and easy access to Lady Bird Lake as potential contributing factors. Despite those explanations, the concentration of deaths in the same general area continued to generate skepticism among residents who questioned how so many people could disappear after visiting the entertainment district and subsequently be discovered in the water. City officials responded by increasing patrols, installing additional lighting and improving barriers near the lake, but the dispute over whether the deaths represented tragic accidents or something more sinister remained unresolved in the public's mind. The serial-killer theory remained unsubstantiated, even as the repeated discoveries intensified demands for answers and greater public safety measures



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76053911Thu, 29 Oct 2026 02:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciA series of unexplained deaths in Austin, Texas, has fueled speculation that a serial killer may be targeting young men around the city's popular Rainey Street entertainment district. By April 2023, at least eight bodies had been recovered from Lady...
Austin police rejected suggestions that the deaths were connected to a serial killer, maintaining that investigators had uncovered no evidence of foul play or a common perpetrator. Authorities explained that the circumstances, locations and characteristics of the victims varied and that medical examinations had not identified injuries suggesting homicide in the drowning cases. Investigators instead pointed to the combination of alcohol consumption, poorly illuminated waterfront areas and easy access to Lady Bird Lake as potential contributing factors. Despite those explanations, the concentration of deaths in the same general area continued to generate skepticism among residents who questioned how so many people could disappear after visiting the entertainment district and subsequently be discovered in the water. City officials responded by increasing patrols, installing additional lighting and improving barriers near the lake, but the dispute over whether the deaths represented tragic accidents or something more sinister remained unresolved in the public's mind. The serial-killer theory remained unsubstantiated, even as the repeated discoveries intensified demands for answers and greater public safety measures



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>625breakingnews,buzzfeedunsolvedtruecrime,news,truecrime,truecrimeaddict,truecrimeallthetime,truecrimeandchill,truecrimebooks,truecrimecommunity,truecrimefan,truecrimegarage,truecrimejunkie,truecrimeobsessed,truecrimepodcast,truecrimepodcasts,truecrimereport,truecrimes,truecrimestoriestruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-day-6-part-3-10-28-26--76051153
The defense concentrated much of its closing argument on the aggravating circumstance that could keep the aggravated-murder charge death-penalty eligible: whether the shooter knowingly created a great risk of death to someone other than Kirk. Attorney Staci Visser stressed that there had been one shot, one bullet and one person struck, arguing that prosecutors were stretching possible dangers—such as a miss, ricochet or pass-through bullet—into proof that another person had actually been placed within the legally required “zone of danger.” Richard Novak separately challenged the state’s evidence concerning political motivation and whether Robinson could reasonably have known children were present. Prosecutor Chad Grunander answered that argument by describing the shot as “ballistic roulette,” emphasizing that Kirk was surrounded by security personnel, a questioner and thousands of spectators and arguing that a slight error in aim could easily have killed someone else. The fundamental dispute at closing was therefore not simply whether the state could identify Robinson as the alleged shooter, but whether prosecutors had established the aggravating circumstances and enhancements necessary to carry the entire case—including its potential death penalty—forward to trial.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76051153Thu, 29 Oct 2026 00:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay six of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing, held September 1, 2026, centered on closing arguments and the prosecution’s claim that the evidence easily cleared Utah’s probable-cause standard. Deputy Utah County Attorney Ryan McBride argued that...
The defense concentrated much of its closing argument on the aggravating circumstance that could keep the aggravated-murder charge death-penalty eligible: whether the shooter knowingly created a great risk of death to someone other than Kirk. Attorney Staci Visser stressed that there had been one shot, one bullet and one person struck, arguing that prosecutors were stretching possible dangers—such as a miss, ricochet or pass-through bullet—into proof that another person had actually been placed within the legally required “zone of danger.” Richard Novak separately challenged the state’s evidence concerning political motivation and whether Robinson could reasonably have known children were present. Prosecutor Chad Grunander answered that argument by describing the shot as “ballistic roulette,” emphasizing that Kirk was surrounded by security personnel, a questioner and thousands of spectators and arguing that a slight error in aim could easily have killed someone else. The fundamental dispute at closing was therefore not simply whether the state could identify Robinson as the alleged shooter, but whether prosecutors had established the aggravating circumstances and enhancements necessary to carry the entire case—including its potential death penalty—forward to trial.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>771breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/judge-delays-decision-on-tyler-robinson-trial-schedule-10-28-26--76051166
The sharpest moment came from Jeffrey Neiman, the attorney representing Erika Kirk, who urged Graf to move the case forward and argued that the Kirk family’s constitutional right to a reasonably speedy resolution should carry significant weight. Neiman warned that “time is the defense’s best ally” and argued that allowing the case to drift toward 2029 would amount to justice being delayed for Kirk’s widow and family. He even suggested the family would contact the federal judge overseeing Novak’s conflicting case and ask that it be moved if necessary. Novak pushed back, telling the court that forcing the case to trial too quickly would increase the likelihood of mistakes and undermine the finality everyone claims to want. The result was a clear collision between the defense’s demand for enough time to prepare a death-penalty case and the Kirk family’s increasingly forceful argument that years of additional delay would be unacceptable.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


Tyler Robinson still has no trial date in Charlie Kirk murder case | Fox News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76051166Wed, 28 Oct 2026 22:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciTyler Robinson’s latest court hearing ended without a trial date after Judge Tony Graf Jr. said he needed more time to weigh competing schedules and the enormous amount of preparation expected in the capital murder case. Prosecutors said they would...
The sharpest moment came from Jeffrey Neiman, the attorney representing Erika Kirk, who urged Graf to move the case forward and argued that the Kirk family’s constitutional right to a reasonably speedy resolution should carry significant weight. Neiman warned that “time is the defense’s best ally” and argued that allowing the case to drift toward 2029 would amount to justice being delayed for Kirk’s widow and family. He even suggested the family would contact the federal judge overseeing Novak’s conflicting case and ask that it be moved if necessary. Novak pushed back, telling the court that forcing the case to trial too quickly would increase the likelihood of mistakes and undermine the finality everyone claims to want. The result was a clear collision between the defense’s demand for enough time to prepare a death-penalty case and the Kirk family’s increasingly forceful argument that years of additional delay would be unacceptable.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


Tyler Robinson still has no trial date in Charlie Kirk murder case | Fox News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>741epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-house-judiciary-democrats-53-page-trump-epstein-report-part-5-10-28-26--76038071
The second half of the report is just as focused on the Justice Department as it is on Trump, accusing DOJ and FBI leadership of deliberately shutting down meaningful investigation of Epstein’s remaining associates and withholding or excessively redacting records that could implicate politically powerful people. The report specifically targets Attorney General Todd Blanche, arguing that during his 2025 prison interview with Maxwell he repeatedly prevented her from discussing a survivor whose FBI account implicated Trump, and contends that Blanche’s conduct raises potential obstruction and witness-tampering questions. It further argues that DOJ’s declaration that there was insufficient evidence to investigate additional Epstein co-conspirators is impossible to reconcile with the material already in federal possession, while pointing to alleged failures to assist investigations in New Mexico and the United Kingdom. The report concludes that DOJ has an irreconcilable conflict of interest and calls for an independent special counsel empowered to investigate Trump as well as Epstein’s other potential accomplices and enablers, while sharing relevant evidence with state and foreign prosecutors. Its central contention is that the Epstein investigation was not exhausted because investigators ran out of evidence, but was curtailed despite evidence that, in the committee Democrats’ view, easily satisfies the federal threshold for opening additional criminal investigations.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

politico.com/f/?id=000001a1-7412-db5d-a7fb-f71f5f490002

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76038071Wed, 28 Oct 2026 20:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe House Judiciary Committee Democratic staff report argues that the publicly released Epstein records, FBI interviews, survivor accounts and congressional investigative material establish more than enough evidence to justify a renewed criminal...
The second half of the report is just as focused on the Justice Department as it is on Trump, accusing DOJ and FBI leadership of deliberately shutting down meaningful investigation of Epstein’s remaining associates and withholding or excessively redacting records that could implicate politically powerful people. The report specifically targets Attorney General Todd Blanche, arguing that during his 2025 prison interview with Maxwell he repeatedly prevented her from discussing a survivor whose FBI account implicated Trump, and contends that Blanche’s conduct raises potential obstruction and witness-tampering questions. It further argues that DOJ’s declaration that there was insufficient evidence to investigate additional Epstein co-conspirators is impossible to reconcile with the material already in federal possession, while pointing to alleged failures to assist investigations in New Mexico and the United Kingdom. The report concludes that DOJ has an irreconcilable conflict of interest and calls for an independent special counsel empowered to investigate Trump as well as Epstein’s other potential accomplices and enablers, while sharing relevant evidence with state and foreign prosecutors. Its central contention is that the Epstein investigation was not exhausted because investigators ran out of evidence, but was curtailed despite evidence that, in the committee Democrats’ view, easily satisfies the federal threshold for opening additional criminal investigations.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

politico.com/f/?id=000001a1-7412-db5d-a7fb-f71f5f490002

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>790epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-house-judiciary-democrats-53-page-trump-epstein-report-part-4-10-28-26--76038069
The second half of the report is just as focused on the Justice Department as it is on Trump, accusing DOJ and FBI leadership of deliberately shutting down meaningful investigation of Epstein’s remaining associates and withholding or excessively redacting records that could implicate politically powerful people. The report specifically targets Attorney General Todd Blanche, arguing that during his 2025 prison interview with Maxwell he repeatedly prevented her from discussing a survivor whose FBI account implicated Trump, and contends that Blanche’s conduct raises potential obstruction and witness-tampering questions. It further argues that DOJ’s declaration that there was insufficient evidence to investigate additional Epstein co-conspirators is impossible to reconcile with the material already in federal possession, while pointing to alleged failures to assist investigations in New Mexico and the United Kingdom. The report concludes that DOJ has an irreconcilable conflict of interest and calls for an independent special counsel empowered to investigate Trump as well as Epstein’s other potential accomplices and enablers, while sharing relevant evidence with state and foreign prosecutors. Its central contention is that the Epstein investigation was not exhausted because investigators ran out of evidence, but was curtailed despite evidence that, in the committee Democrats’ view, easily satisfies the federal threshold for opening additional criminal investigations.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

politico.com/f/?id=000001a1-7412-db5d-a7fb-f71f5f490002

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76038069Wed, 28 Oct 2026 18:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe House Judiciary Committee Democratic staff report argues that the publicly released Epstein records, FBI interviews, survivor accounts and congressional investigative material establish more than enough evidence to justify a renewed criminal...
The second half of the report is just as focused on the Justice Department as it is on Trump, accusing DOJ and FBI leadership of deliberately shutting down meaningful investigation of Epstein’s remaining associates and withholding or excessively redacting records that could implicate politically powerful people. The report specifically targets Attorney General Todd Blanche, arguing that during his 2025 prison interview with Maxwell he repeatedly prevented her from discussing a survivor whose FBI account implicated Trump, and contends that Blanche’s conduct raises potential obstruction and witness-tampering questions. It further argues that DOJ’s declaration that there was insufficient evidence to investigate additional Epstein co-conspirators is impossible to reconcile with the material already in federal possession, while pointing to alleged failures to assist investigations in New Mexico and the United Kingdom. The report concludes that DOJ has an irreconcilable conflict of interest and calls for an independent special counsel empowered to investigate Trump as well as Epstein’s other potential accomplices and enablers, while sharing relevant evidence with state and foreign prosecutors. Its central contention is that the Epstein investigation was not exhausted because investigators ran out of evidence, but was curtailed despite evidence that, in the committee Democrats’ view, easily satisfies the federal threshold for opening additional criminal investigations.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

politico.com/f/?id=000001a1-7412-db5d-a7fb-f71f5f490002

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>689epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-house-judiciary-democrats-53-page-trump-epstein-report-part-3-10-28-26--76038070
The second half of the report is just as focused on the Justice Department as it is on Trump, accusing DOJ and FBI leadership of deliberately shutting down meaningful investigation of Epstein’s remaining associates and withholding or excessively redacting records that could implicate politically powerful people. The report specifically targets Attorney General Todd Blanche, arguing that during his 2025 prison interview with Maxwell he repeatedly prevented her from discussing a survivor whose FBI account implicated Trump, and contends that Blanche’s conduct raises potential obstruction and witness-tampering questions. It further argues that DOJ’s declaration that there was insufficient evidence to investigate additional Epstein co-conspirators is impossible to reconcile with the material already in federal possession, while pointing to alleged failures to assist investigations in New Mexico and the United Kingdom. The report concludes that DOJ has an irreconcilable conflict of interest and calls for an independent special counsel empowered to investigate Trump as well as Epstein’s other potential accomplices and enablers, while sharing relevant evidence with state and foreign prosecutors. Its central contention is that the Epstein investigation was not exhausted because investigators ran out of evidence, but was curtailed despite evidence that, in the committee Democrats’ view, easily satisfies the federal threshold for opening additional criminal investigations.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

politico.com/f/?id=000001a1-7412-db5d-a7fb-f71f5f490002

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76038070Wed, 28 Oct 2026 16:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe House Judiciary Committee Democratic staff report argues that the publicly released Epstein records, FBI interviews, survivor accounts and congressional investigative material establish more than enough evidence to justify a renewed criminal...
The second half of the report is just as focused on the Justice Department as it is on Trump, accusing DOJ and FBI leadership of deliberately shutting down meaningful investigation of Epstein’s remaining associates and withholding or excessively redacting records that could implicate politically powerful people. The report specifically targets Attorney General Todd Blanche, arguing that during his 2025 prison interview with Maxwell he repeatedly prevented her from discussing a survivor whose FBI account implicated Trump, and contends that Blanche’s conduct raises potential obstruction and witness-tampering questions. It further argues that DOJ’s declaration that there was insufficient evidence to investigate additional Epstein co-conspirators is impossible to reconcile with the material already in federal possession, while pointing to alleged failures to assist investigations in New Mexico and the United Kingdom. The report concludes that DOJ has an irreconcilable conflict of interest and calls for an independent special counsel empowered to investigate Trump as well as Epstein’s other potential accomplices and enablers, while sharing relevant evidence with state and foreign prosecutors. Its central contention is that the Epstein investigation was not exhausted because investigators ran out of evidence, but was curtailed despite evidence that, in the committee Democrats’ view, easily satisfies the federal threshold for opening additional criminal investigations.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

politico.com/f/?id=000001a1-7412-db5d-a7fb-f71f5f490002

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>657epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/white-house-emails-blow-apart-the-story-behind-the-epstein-memo-10-28-26--76038068
The emails also show the White House taking an active role in how the memorandum would be presented publicly. After Blanche sent Budowich what he described as a final version without official letterhead, Budowich insisted that the document carry DOJ and FBI identification, writing that “someone needs to own this” before it was provided to reporters. Blanche’s counsel subsequently supplied the requested version. The correspondence does not reveal whether the White House successfully changed the memo’s substantive conclusions because the proposed edits were redacted, but it establishes that White House officials were not merely passive recipients of an independent law-enforcement announcement. They were reviewing the document, suggesting changes, circulating it through the communications operation and directing how it would be packaged for public release, even though the memorandum effectively announced that the government saw no basis for additional Epstein-related investigations or disclosures.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:


Secret email puts White House fingerprints on Epstein memo: 'Someone needs to own this' - Raw Story

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76038068Wed, 28 Oct 2026 14:25:02 +0000Bobby CapucciNewly released emails show that the White House was directly involved in preparing the July 2025 DOJ-FBI memorandum that declared there was no evidence to justify investigations of additional uncharged individuals connected to Jeffrey Epstein and that...
The emails also show the White House taking an active role in how the memorandum would be presented publicly. After Blanche sent Budowich what he described as a final version without official letterhead, Budowich insisted that the document carry DOJ and FBI identification, writing that “someone needs to own this” before it was provided to reporters. Blanche’s counsel subsequently supplied the requested version. The correspondence does not reveal whether the White House successfully changed the memo’s substantive conclusions because the proposed edits were redacted, but it establishes that White House officials were not merely passive recipients of an independent law-enforcement announcement. They were reviewing the document, suggesting changes, circulating it through the communications operation and directing how it would be packaged for public release, even though the memorandum effectively announced that the government saw no basis for additional Epstein-related investigations or disclosures.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:


Secret email puts White House fingerprints on Epstein memo: 'Someone needs to own this' - Raw Story

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1286epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/new-mexico-epstein-truth-commission-left-with-vacant-seat-10-28-26--76047995
The decision has intensified partisan criticism surrounding a commission already plagued by internal disputes. House Republican Leader Gail Armstrong says leaving Reeb’s seat vacant destroys the bipartisan balance required by the resolution that created the commission and raises questions about whether the final report can be trusted to present an impartial account. The commission previously became embroiled in disputes over references to Democratic gubernatorial nominee Deb Haaland and allegations involving commission chair Andrea Romero’s employment with a district attorney’s office, a position Romero ultimately left while remaining on the panel. Reeb’s own resignation followed a judicial ruling that her legislative position conflicted with her work as a special prosecutor in the Alec Baldwin case. The commission is now moving toward its final Epstein report with only three members and continued political fighting over whether its investigation has been conducted independently and thoroughly enough to answer lingering questions about Epstein’s decades-long presence in New Mexico.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

New Mexico House Speaker Martínez won’t fill vacant seat on Epstein ‘Truth Commission’ • Source New Mexico

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76047995Wed, 28 Oct 2026 12:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciNew Mexico House Speaker Javier Martínez says he will not appoint a replacement to the state’s Epstein “Truth Commission” after Republican Rep. Andrea Reeb resigned from the Legislature and the commission earlier in October. The bipartisan...
The decision has intensified partisan criticism surrounding a commission already plagued by internal disputes. House Republican Leader Gail Armstrong says leaving Reeb’s seat vacant destroys the bipartisan balance required by the resolution that created the commission and raises questions about whether the final report can be trusted to present an impartial account. The commission previously became embroiled in disputes over references to Democratic gubernatorial nominee Deb Haaland and allegations involving commission chair Andrea Romero’s employment with a district attorney’s office, a position Romero ultimately left while remaining on the panel. Reeb’s own resignation followed a judicial ruling that her legislative position conflicted with her work as a special prosecutor in the Alec Baldwin case. The commission is now moving toward its final Epstein report with only three members and continued political fighting over whether its investigation has been conducted independently and thoroughly enough to answer lingering questions about Epstein’s decades-long presence in New Mexico.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

New Mexico House Speaker Martínez won’t fill vacant seat on Epstein ‘Truth Commission’ • Source New Mexico

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>740epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-romance-novelist-and-the-husband-she-murdered-10-28-26--76032252
The case attracted national attention after investigators discovered that Crampton Brophy had previously written an online essay titled How to Murder Your Husband, in which she discussed fictional scenarios involving women killing their spouses and the difficulties of getting away with murder. Although the essay became one of the most widely publicized aspects of the case, the trial judge excluded it from evidence because of its potential to unfairly prejudice the jury. During her 2022 trial, prosecutors presented financial records, surveillance footage, firearm purchases and testimony establishing that Nancy had both the opportunity and an alleged financial motive to kill Daniel. The defense maintained that the couple had a loving relationship, disputed the prosecution's financial theory and argued that the evidence failed to establish her guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Nancy testified in her own defense, denying that she had murdered her husband and explaining that her interest in firearms was connected to research for her writing. On May 25, 2022, following a seven-week trial, a jury convicted her of second-degree murder with a firearm. She was subsequently sentenced to life imprisonment with the possibility of parole after 25 years, bringing an end to a case in which a novelist known for writing about fictional crimes was convicted of carrying out the murder of her own husband.


to contacct me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76032252Wed, 28 Oct 2026 10:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciNancy Crampton Brophy is an American romance novelist from Portland, Oregon, who became the center of a murder investigation after her husband, 63-year-old chef and culinary instructor Daniel Brophy, was found shot to death at the Oregon Culinary...
The case attracted national attention after investigators discovered that Crampton Brophy had previously written an online essay titled How to Murder Your Husband, in which she discussed fictional scenarios involving women killing their spouses and the difficulties of getting away with murder. Although the essay became one of the most widely publicized aspects of the case, the trial judge excluded it from evidence because of its potential to unfairly prejudice the jury. During her 2022 trial, prosecutors presented financial records, surveillance footage, firearm purchases and testimony establishing that Nancy had both the opportunity and an alleged financial motive to kill Daniel. The defense maintained that the couple had a loving relationship, disputed the prosecution's financial theory and argued that the evidence failed to establish her guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Nancy testified in her own defense, denying that she had murdered her husband and explaining that her interest in firearms was connected to research for her writing. On May 25, 2022, following a seven-week trial, a jury convicted her of second-degree murder with a firearm. She was subsequently sentenced to life imprisonment with the possibility of parole after 25 years, bringing an end to a case in which a novelist known for writing about fictional crimes was convicted of carrying out the murder of her own husband.


to contacct me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2417breakingnews,buzzfeedunsolvedtruecrime,news,truecrime,truecrimeaddict,truecrimeallthetime,truecrimeandchill,truecrimebooks,truecrimecommunity,truecrimefan,truecrimegarage,truecrimejunkie,truecrimeobsessed,truecrimepodcast,truecrimepodcasts,truecrimereport,truecrimes,truecrimestoriestruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-whitey-bulger-and-his-relationship-with-the-feds-10-28-26--76032251
The depth of the corruption became undeniable when investigators established that Connolly had repeatedly supplied Bulger with confidential law enforcement information, including intelligence that contributed to the murders of potential witnesses. In December 1994, Connolly warned Bulger that federal authorities were preparing to arrest him, allowing the gangster to disappear before his January 1995 indictment. Bulger remained a fugitive for more than 16 years before authorities captured him in Santa Monica, California, in June 2011. Connolly was eventually convicted of federal racketeering, obstruction of justice and false statements, and separately convicted in Florida in connection with a murder facilitated by his disclosure of confidential information. During Bulger's 2013 federal trial, prosecutors detailed an extensive criminal conspiracy involving organized crime figures and corrupt law enforcement officials, resulting in his conviction on racketeering charges and responsibility for 11 murders. He received two consecutive life sentences and died in 2018 after being beaten to death at a federal prison in West Virginia. The Bulger scandal demonstrated that the government's relationship with criminal informants could become something far more sinister than an investigative arrangement. For decades, elements of the FBI protected a murderous criminal enterprise while accepting intelligence from the very men they were supposed to be investigating, leaving innocent people dead and exposing a catastrophic breakdown of federal law enforcement oversight.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76032251Wed, 28 Oct 2026 08:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJames “Whitey” Bulger was one of the most notorious organized crime figures in American history, a ruthless Boston gangster who controlled the Winter Hill Gang and built a criminal empire through murder, extortion, loansharking, illegal gambling and...
The depth of the corruption became undeniable when investigators established that Connolly had repeatedly supplied Bulger with confidential law enforcement information, including intelligence that contributed to the murders of potential witnesses. In December 1994, Connolly warned Bulger that federal authorities were preparing to arrest him, allowing the gangster to disappear before his January 1995 indictment. Bulger remained a fugitive for more than 16 years before authorities captured him in Santa Monica, California, in June 2011. Connolly was eventually convicted of federal racketeering, obstruction of justice and false statements, and separately convicted in Florida in connection with a murder facilitated by his disclosure of confidential information. During Bulger's 2013 federal trial, prosecutors detailed an extensive criminal conspiracy involving organized crime figures and corrupt law enforcement officials, resulting in his conviction on racketeering charges and responsibility for 11 murders. He received two consecutive life sentences and died in 2018 after being beaten to death at a federal prison in West Virginia. The Bulger scandal demonstrated that the government's relationship with criminal informants could become something far more sinister than an investigative arrangement. For decades, elements of the FBI protected a murderous criminal enterprise while accepting intelligence from the very men they were supposed to be investigating, leaving innocent people dead and exposing a catastrophic breakdown of federal law enforcement oversight.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3410breakingnews,buzzfeedunsolvedtruecrime,news,truecrime,truecrimeaddict,truecrimeallthetime,truecrimeandchill,truecrimebooks,truecrimecommunity,truecrimefan,truecrimegarage,truecrimejunkie,truecrimeobsessed,truecrimepodcast,truecrimepodcasts,truecrimereport,truecrimes,truecrimestoriestruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-dentist-who-murdered-his-wife-with-arsenic-10-28-26--76032250
Craig's criminal conduct continued after his arrest, when authorities uncovered attempts to manipulate evidence, interfere with witnesses and obstruct the prosecution. While awaiting trial, he solicited other individuals to fabricate evidence and provide false testimony intended to support a claim that Angela had committed suicide or had asked him to help end her life. Prosecutors also established that Craig attempted to arrange the murder of the lead detective investigating his wife's death, an extraordinary escalation that resulted in an additional solicitation charge. He even attempted to persuade one of his daughters to create a fabricated video depicting Angela saying she wanted to be poisoned. On July 30, 2025, an Arapahoe County jury found Craig guilty of first-degree murder and five additional offenses involving solicitation to commit murder, evidence tampering and perjury. Judge Shay Whitaker sentenced him to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole, bringing the prosecution to a close after a trial that exposed not only the calculated poisoning of his wife but also an extensive campaign to undermine the criminal investigation and escape responsibility for her murder.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76032250Wed, 28 Oct 2026 06:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciJames Toliver Craig was a Colorado dentist who was convicted of murdering his wife, Angela Craig, the 43-year-old mother of their six children, after secretly poisoning her over approximately ten days in March 2023. Prosecutors established that Craig...
Craig's criminal conduct continued after his arrest, when authorities uncovered attempts to manipulate evidence, interfere with witnesses and obstruct the prosecution. While awaiting trial, he solicited other individuals to fabricate evidence and provide false testimony intended to support a claim that Angela had committed suicide or had asked him to help end her life. Prosecutors also established that Craig attempted to arrange the murder of the lead detective investigating his wife's death, an extraordinary escalation that resulted in an additional solicitation charge. He even attempted to persuade one of his daughters to create a fabricated video depicting Angela saying she wanted to be poisoned. On July 30, 2025, an Arapahoe County jury found Craig guilty of first-degree murder and five additional offenses involving solicitation to commit murder, evidence tampering and perjury. Judge Shay Whitaker sentenced him to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole, bringing the prosecution to a close after a trial that exposed not only the calculated poisoning of his wife but also an extensive campaign to undermine the criminal investigation and escape responsibility for her murder.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2525breakingnews,buzzfeedunsolvedtruecrime,news,truecrime,truecrimeaddict,truecrimeallthetime,truecrimeandchill,truecrimebooks,truecrimecommunity,truecrimefan,truecrimegarage,truecrimejunkie,truecrimeobsessed,truecrimepodcast,truecrimepodcasts,truecrimereport,truecrimes,truecrimestoriestruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/leon-black-s-epstein-fallout-stopped-at-the-museum-door-part-2--76036959
The story was also an indictment of an art world that has repeatedly demonstrated an extraordinary capacity to overlook almost anything when enormous wealth, prestigious collections, and major donations are involved. Black did not merely purchase paintings; his money bought him extraordinary institutional standing, culminating in his chairmanship of the Museum of Modern Art, while his masterpieces circulated through museums that benefited from his patronage and prestige. Even after the Epstein relationship became impossible to ignore, Black remained on MoMA’s board and continued appearing at major art fairs, museum dinners, galleries, sporting events, and elite cultural gatherings. That resilience illustrated one of the uglier realities of the contemporary art ecosystem: museums and cultural institutions frequently present themselves as moral authorities while remaining financially dependent upon billionaires whose money grants them astonishing insulation from ordinary reputational consequences. Black eventually surrendered leadership positions at Apollo and MoMA, but he was hardly exiled from the cultural establishment. The art world absorbed the scandal, issued the requisite expressions of concern, and largely moved forward with one of its most valuable collectors still inside the tent. In that sense, the Black-Epstein story was about much more than one billionaire’s extraordinarily questionable judgment. It demonstrated how an industry built around opaque ownership, private transactions, tax strategy, asset-backed borrowing, billionaire philanthropy, and social exclusivity could provide the perfect environment for uncomfortable questions to remain unanswered as long as the person writing the checks remained important enough.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

The Strange Tale of Leon Black and Jeffrey Epstein | Vanity Fair

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76036959Wed, 28 Oct 2026 04:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciLeon Black’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein exposed just how deeply the worlds of high finance, elite philanthropy, and blue-chip art could overlap without much meaningful scrutiny. Black, the billionaire cofounder of Apollo Global Management and...
The story was also an indictment of an art world that has repeatedly demonstrated an extraordinary capacity to overlook almost anything when enormous wealth, prestigious collections, and major donations are involved. Black did not merely purchase paintings; his money bought him extraordinary institutional standing, culminating in his chairmanship of the Museum of Modern Art, while his masterpieces circulated through museums that benefited from his patronage and prestige. Even after the Epstein relationship became impossible to ignore, Black remained on MoMA’s board and continued appearing at major art fairs, museum dinners, galleries, sporting events, and elite cultural gatherings. That resilience illustrated one of the uglier realities of the contemporary art ecosystem: museums and cultural institutions frequently present themselves as moral authorities while remaining financially dependent upon billionaires whose money grants them astonishing insulation from ordinary reputational consequences. Black eventually surrendered leadership positions at Apollo and MoMA, but he was hardly exiled from the cultural establishment. The art world absorbed the scandal, issued the requisite expressions of concern, and largely moved forward with one of its most valuable collectors still inside the tent. In that sense, the Black-Epstein story was about much more than one billionaire’s extraordinarily questionable judgment. It demonstrated how an industry built around opaque ownership, private transactions, tax strategy, asset-backed borrowing, billionaire philanthropy, and social exclusivity could provide the perfect environment for uncomfortable questions to remain unanswered as long as the person writing the checks remained important enough.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

The Strange Tale of Leon Black and Jeffrey Epstein | Vanity Fair

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>944breakingnews,breakingnewsupdates,cartel,cartelnews,chapitos,cjng,elchapo,elmayo,elmayozambada,jaliscocartel,loschapitos,mayitos,mexico,narcos,news,occ,organizedcrime,rico,sinaloacartel,zambadatruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/leon-black-s-epstein-fallout-stopped-at-the-museum-door-part-1--76036960
The story was also an indictment of an art world that has repeatedly demonstrated an extraordinary capacity to overlook almost anything when enormous wealth, prestigious collections, and major donations are involved. Black did not merely purchase paintings; his money bought him extraordinary institutional standing, culminating in his chairmanship of the Museum of Modern Art, while his masterpieces circulated through museums that benefited from his patronage and prestige. Even after the Epstein relationship became impossible to ignore, Black remained on MoMA’s board and continued appearing at major art fairs, museum dinners, galleries, sporting events, and elite cultural gatherings. That resilience illustrated one of the uglier realities of the contemporary art ecosystem: museums and cultural institutions frequently present themselves as moral authorities while remaining financially dependent upon billionaires whose money grants them astonishing insulation from ordinary reputational consequences. Black eventually surrendered leadership positions at Apollo and MoMA, but he was hardly exiled from the cultural establishment. The art world absorbed the scandal, issued the requisite expressions of concern, and largely moved forward with one of its most valuable collectors still inside the tent. In that sense, the Black-Epstein story was about much more than one billionaire’s extraordinarily questionable judgment. It demonstrated how an industry built around opaque ownership, private transactions, tax strategy, asset-backed borrowing, billionaire philanthropy, and social exclusivity could provide the perfect environment for uncomfortable questions to remain unanswered as long as the person writing the checks remained important enough.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

The Strange Tale of Leon Black and Jeffrey Epstein | Vanity Fair

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76036960Wed, 28 Oct 2026 02:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciLeon Black’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein exposed just how deeply the worlds of high finance, elite philanthropy, and blue-chip art could overlap without much meaningful scrutiny. Black, the billionaire cofounder of Apollo Global Management and...
The story was also an indictment of an art world that has repeatedly demonstrated an extraordinary capacity to overlook almost anything when enormous wealth, prestigious collections, and major donations are involved. Black did not merely purchase paintings; his money bought him extraordinary institutional standing, culminating in his chairmanship of the Museum of Modern Art, while his masterpieces circulated through museums that benefited from his patronage and prestige. Even after the Epstein relationship became impossible to ignore, Black remained on MoMA’s board and continued appearing at major art fairs, museum dinners, galleries, sporting events, and elite cultural gatherings. That resilience illustrated one of the uglier realities of the contemporary art ecosystem: museums and cultural institutions frequently present themselves as moral authorities while remaining financially dependent upon billionaires whose money grants them astonishing insulation from ordinary reputational consequences. Black eventually surrendered leadership positions at Apollo and MoMA, but he was hardly exiled from the cultural establishment. The art world absorbed the scandal, issued the requisite expressions of concern, and largely moved forward with one of its most valuable collectors still inside the tent. In that sense, the Black-Epstein story was about much more than one billionaire’s extraordinarily questionable judgment. It demonstrated how an industry built around opaque ownership, private transactions, tax strategy, asset-backed borrowing, billionaire philanthropy, and social exclusivity could provide the perfect environment for uncomfortable questions to remain unanswered as long as the person writing the checks remained important enough.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

The Strange Tale of Leon Black and Jeffrey Epstein | Vanity Fair

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>859epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-day-6-part-2-10-27-26--76030998
The defense concentrated much of its closing argument on the aggravating circumstance that could keep the aggravated-murder charge death-penalty eligible: whether the shooter knowingly created a great risk of death to someone other than Kirk. Attorney Staci Visser stressed that there had been one shot, one bullet and one person struck, arguing that prosecutors were stretching possible dangers—such as a miss, ricochet or pass-through bullet—into proof that another person had actually been placed within the legally required “zone of danger.” Richard Novak separately challenged the state’s evidence concerning political motivation and whether Robinson could reasonably have known children were present. Prosecutor Chad Grunander answered that argument by describing the shot as “ballistic roulette,” emphasizing that Kirk was surrounded by security personnel, a questioner and thousands of spectators and arguing that a slight error in aim could easily have killed someone else. The fundamental dispute at closing was therefore not simply whether the state could identify Robinson as the alleged shooter, but whether prosecutors had established the aggravating circumstances and enhancements necessary to carry the entire case—including its potential death penalty—forward to trial.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76030998Wed, 28 Oct 2026 00:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay six of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing, held September 1, 2026, centered on closing arguments and the prosecution’s claim that the evidence easily cleared Utah’s probable-cause standard. Deputy Utah County Attorney Ryan McBride argued that...
The defense concentrated much of its closing argument on the aggravating circumstance that could keep the aggravated-murder charge death-penalty eligible: whether the shooter knowingly created a great risk of death to someone other than Kirk. Attorney Staci Visser stressed that there had been one shot, one bullet and one person struck, arguing that prosecutors were stretching possible dangers—such as a miss, ricochet or pass-through bullet—into proof that another person had actually been placed within the legally required “zone of danger.” Richard Novak separately challenged the state’s evidence concerning political motivation and whether Robinson could reasonably have known children were present. Prosecutor Chad Grunander answered that argument by describing the shot as “ballistic roulette,” emphasizing that Kirk was surrounded by security personnel, a questioner and thousands of spectators and arguing that a slight error in aim could easily have killed someone else. The fundamental dispute at closing was therefore not simply whether the state could identify Robinson as the alleged shooter, but whether prosecutors had established the aggravating circumstances and enhancements necessary to carry the entire case—including its potential death penalty—forward to trial.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>836breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/judge-delays-decision-on-tyler-robinson-trial-schedule-10-27-26--76030995
The sharpest moment came from Jeffrey Neiman, the attorney representing Erika Kirk, who urged Graf to move the case forward and argued that the Kirk family’s constitutional right to a reasonably speedy resolution should carry significant weight. Neiman warned that “time is the defense’s best ally” and argued that allowing the case to drift toward 2029 would amount to justice being delayed for Kirk’s widow and family. He even suggested the family would contact the federal judge overseeing Novak’s conflicting case and ask that it be moved if necessary. Novak pushed back, telling the court that forcing the case to trial too quickly would increase the likelihood of mistakes and undermine the finality everyone claims to want. The result was a clear collision between the defense’s demand for enough time to prepare a death-penalty case and the Kirk family’s increasingly forceful argument that years of additional delay would be unacceptable.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


Tyler Robinson still has no trial date in Charlie Kirk murder case | Fox News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76030995Tue, 27 Oct 2026 22:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciTyler Robinson’s latest court hearing ended without a trial date after Judge Tony Graf Jr. said he needed more time to weigh competing schedules and the enormous amount of preparation expected in the capital murder case. Prosecutors said they would...
The sharpest moment came from Jeffrey Neiman, the attorney representing Erika Kirk, who urged Graf to move the case forward and argued that the Kirk family’s constitutional right to a reasonably speedy resolution should carry significant weight. Neiman warned that “time is the defense’s best ally” and argued that allowing the case to drift toward 2029 would amount to justice being delayed for Kirk’s widow and family. He even suggested the family would contact the federal judge overseeing Novak’s conflicting case and ask that it be moved if necessary. Novak pushed back, telling the court that forcing the case to trial too quickly would increase the likelihood of mistakes and undermine the finality everyone claims to want. The result was a clear collision between the defense’s demand for enough time to prepare a death-penalty case and the Kirk family’s increasingly forceful argument that years of additional delay would be unacceptable.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


Tyler Robinson still has no trial date in Charlie Kirk murder case | Fox News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>741breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-house-judiciary-democrats-53-page-trump-epstein-report-part-2-10-27-26--76030941
The second half of the report is just as focused on the Justice Department as it is on Trump, accusing DOJ and FBI leadership of deliberately shutting down meaningful investigation of Epstein’s remaining associates and withholding or excessively redacting records that could implicate politically powerful people. The report specifically targets Attorney General Todd Blanche, arguing that during his 2025 prison interview with Maxwell he repeatedly prevented her from discussing a survivor whose FBI account implicated Trump, and contends that Blanche’s conduct raises potential obstruction and witness-tampering questions. It further argues that DOJ’s declaration that there was insufficient evidence to investigate additional Epstein co-conspirators is impossible to reconcile with the material already in federal possession, while pointing to alleged failures to assist investigations in New Mexico and the United Kingdom. The report concludes that DOJ has an irreconcilable conflict of interest and calls for an independent special counsel empowered to investigate Trump as well as Epstein’s other potential accomplices and enablers, while sharing relevant evidence with state and foreign prosecutors. Its central contention is that the Epstein investigation was not exhausted because investigators ran out of evidence, but was curtailed despite evidence that, in the committee Democrats’ view, easily satisfies the federal threshold for opening additional criminal investigations.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

politico.com/f/?id=000001a1-7412-db5d-a7fb-f71f5f490002

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76030941Tue, 27 Oct 2026 20:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe House Judiciary Committee Democratic staff report argues that the publicly released Epstein records, FBI interviews, survivor accounts and congressional investigative material establish more than enough evidence to justify a renewed criminal...
The second half of the report is just as focused on the Justice Department as it is on Trump, accusing DOJ and FBI leadership of deliberately shutting down meaningful investigation of Epstein’s remaining associates and withholding or excessively redacting records that could implicate politically powerful people. The report specifically targets Attorney General Todd Blanche, arguing that during his 2025 prison interview with Maxwell he repeatedly prevented her from discussing a survivor whose FBI account implicated Trump, and contends that Blanche’s conduct raises potential obstruction and witness-tampering questions. It further argues that DOJ’s declaration that there was insufficient evidence to investigate additional Epstein co-conspirators is impossible to reconcile with the material already in federal possession, while pointing to alleged failures to assist investigations in New Mexico and the United Kingdom. The report concludes that DOJ has an irreconcilable conflict of interest and calls for an independent special counsel empowered to investigate Trump as well as Epstein’s other potential accomplices and enablers, while sharing relevant evidence with state and foreign prosecutors. Its central contention is that the Epstein investigation was not exhausted because investigators ran out of evidence, but was curtailed despite evidence that, in the committee Democrats’ view, easily satisfies the federal threshold for opening additional criminal investigations.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

politico.com/f/?id=000001a1-7412-db5d-a7fb-f71f5f490002

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>675epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-house-judiciary-democrats-53-page-trump-epstein-report-part-1-10-27-26--76030942
The second half of the report is just as focused on the Justice Department as it is on Trump, accusing DOJ and FBI leadership of deliberately shutting down meaningful investigation of Epstein’s remaining associates and withholding or excessively redacting records that could implicate politically powerful people. The report specifically targets Attorney General Todd Blanche, arguing that during his 2025 prison interview with Maxwell he repeatedly prevented her from discussing a survivor whose FBI account implicated Trump, and contends that Blanche’s conduct raises potential obstruction and witness-tampering questions. It further argues that DOJ’s declaration that there was insufficient evidence to investigate additional Epstein co-conspirators is impossible to reconcile with the material already in federal possession, while pointing to alleged failures to assist investigations in New Mexico and the United Kingdom. The report concludes that DOJ has an irreconcilable conflict of interest and calls for an independent special counsel empowered to investigate Trump as well as Epstein’s other potential accomplices and enablers, while sharing relevant evidence with state and foreign prosecutors. Its central contention is that the Epstein investigation was not exhausted because investigators ran out of evidence, but was curtailed despite evidence that, in the committee Democrats’ view, easily satisfies the federal threshold for opening additional criminal investigations.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

politico.com/f/?id=000001a1-7412-db5d-a7fb-f71f5f490002

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76030942Tue, 27 Oct 2026 18:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciThe House Judiciary Committee Democratic staff report argues that the publicly released Epstein records, FBI interviews, survivor accounts and congressional investigative material establish more than enough evidence to justify a renewed criminal...
The second half of the report is just as focused on the Justice Department as it is on Trump, accusing DOJ and FBI leadership of deliberately shutting down meaningful investigation of Epstein’s remaining associates and withholding or excessively redacting records that could implicate politically powerful people. The report specifically targets Attorney General Todd Blanche, arguing that during his 2025 prison interview with Maxwell he repeatedly prevented her from discussing a survivor whose FBI account implicated Trump, and contends that Blanche’s conduct raises potential obstruction and witness-tampering questions. It further argues that DOJ’s declaration that there was insufficient evidence to investigate additional Epstein co-conspirators is impossible to reconcile with the material already in federal possession, while pointing to alleged failures to assist investigations in New Mexico and the United Kingdom. The report concludes that DOJ has an irreconcilable conflict of interest and calls for an independent special counsel empowered to investigate Trump as well as Epstein’s other potential accomplices and enablers, while sharing relevant evidence with state and foreign prosecutors. Its central contention is that the Epstein investigation was not exhausted because investigators ran out of evidence, but was curtailed despite evidence that, in the committee Democrats’ view, easily satisfies the federal threshold for opening additional criminal investigations.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

politico.com/f/?id=000001a1-7412-db5d-a7fb-f71f5f490002

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>713epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/house-democrats-call-for-special-counsel-in-epstein-investigation-10-27-26--76024701
The Democrats also tied the special-counsel demand to their broader accusation that DOJ has repeatedly restricted scrutiny of Epstein’s network. They pointed to the termination of an Epstein-related federal investigation, disputes over evidence released under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, and allegations that DOJ has failed to fully cooperate with state and foreign authorities investigating Epstein associates. The report specifically argued that the same department facing accusations of withholding evidence should not be trusted as the final arbiter of whether the president or other powerful figures require investigation. Congress itself cannot appoint a special counsel, so the recommendation would ultimately require action within the Justice Department, but Democrats are making clear that they intend to continue pursuing the issue through congressional investigations and legislation—particularly if they gain control of the House after the midterm elections. Trump has denied wrongdoing in connection with Epstein.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

House Judiciary Democrats want a special counsel to investigate Trump's ties to Epstein - Live Updates - POLITICO

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76024701Tue, 27 Oct 2026 16:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciHouse Judiciary Committee Democrats are calling for the appointment of an independent special counsel to investigate Donald Trump’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, potential Epstein co-conspirators, and what Democrats characterize as a Justice...
The Democrats also tied the special-counsel demand to their broader accusation that DOJ has repeatedly restricted scrutiny of Epstein’s network. They pointed to the termination of an Epstein-related federal investigation, disputes over evidence released under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, and allegations that DOJ has failed to fully cooperate with state and foreign authorities investigating Epstein associates. The report specifically argued that the same department facing accusations of withholding evidence should not be trusted as the final arbiter of whether the president or other powerful figures require investigation. Congress itself cannot appoint a special counsel, so the recommendation would ultimately require action within the Justice Department, but Democrats are making clear that they intend to continue pursuing the issue through congressional investigations and legislation—particularly if they gain control of the House after the midterm elections. Trump has denied wrongdoing in connection with Epstein.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

House Judiciary Democrats want a special counsel to investigate Trump's ties to Epstein - Live Updates - POLITICO

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>669epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-dubins-exit-mount-sinai-as-old-epstein-questions-resurface-part-2-10-27-26--76024699
The renewed attention makes the history of that relationship worth revisiting from the beginning. The Dubins did not suddenly become relevant because of the latest headlines; their names have repeatedly appeared throughout the broader Epstein record, often without becoming the central focus of scrutiny. As new reporting and documents continue to bring old relationships back into view, the question is no longer whether Glenn and Eva Dubin were significant figures in Epstein’s world, but why it took so long for their role to receive the level of attention it always warranted.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76024699Tue, 27 Oct 2026 14:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciGlenn and Eva Dubin are back in the news, renewing scrutiny of their long-standing relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and raising fresh questions about why the couple remained comparatively insulated from the fallout surrounding his network for so many...
The renewed attention makes the history of that relationship worth revisiting from the beginning. The Dubins did not suddenly become relevant because of the latest headlines; their names have repeatedly appeared throughout the broader Epstein record, often without becoming the central focus of scrutiny. As new reporting and documents continue to bring old relationships back into view, the question is no longer whether Glenn and Eva Dubin were significant figures in Epstein’s world, but why it took so long for their role to receive the level of attention it always warranted.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1125epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-dubins-exit-mount-sinai-as-old-epstein-questions-resurface-part-1-10-27-26--76024700
The renewed attention makes the history of that relationship worth revisiting from the beginning. The Dubins did not suddenly become relevant because of the latest headlines; their names have repeatedly appeared throughout the broader Epstein record, often without becoming the central focus of scrutiny. As new reporting and documents continue to bring old relationships back into view, the question is no longer whether Glenn and Eva Dubin were significant figures in Epstein’s world, but why it took so long for their role to receive the level of attention it always warranted.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76024700Tue, 27 Oct 2026 12:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciGlenn and Eva Dubin are back in the news, renewing scrutiny of their long-standing relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and raising fresh questions about why the couple remained comparatively insulated from the fallout surrounding his network for so many...
The renewed attention makes the history of that relationship worth revisiting from the beginning. The Dubins did not suddenly become relevant because of the latest headlines; their names have repeatedly appeared throughout the broader Epstein record, often without becoming the central focus of scrutiny. As new reporting and documents continue to bring old relationships back into view, the question is no longer whether Glenn and Eva Dubin were significant figures in Epstein’s world, but why it took so long for their role to receive the level of attention it always warranted.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>714epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-los-chapito-s-and-their-fentanyl-empire-10-27-26--76004937
The empire was maintained through a combination of logistics, corruption, intimidation and extreme violence. U.S. authorities allege that Los Chapitos employed armed sicarios to protect laboratories, trafficking routes and leadership, while kidnapping, torturing or killing people who interfered with the operation. Once fentanyl reached the United States, distribution networks moved pills and powder across the country, while proceeds were funneled back to Mexico through bulk cash, trade-based laundering and cryptocurrency. DEA officials have described the Chapitos organization as one of the largest and most prolific fentanyl-trafficking operations in the world, with control extending from the acquisition of raw chemicals all the way through street-level distribution and money laundering. In effect, they did not simply add fentanyl to an existing cartel portfolio; they industrialized it, using the Sinaloa Cartel’s infrastructure to build a high-volume synthetic-drug enterprise capable of producing enormous quantities at comparatively low cost.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76004937Tue, 27 Oct 2026 10:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciLos Chapitos—the faction of the Sinaloa Cartel led by sons of Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán—built their fentanyl empire by turning the drug trade into a vertically integrated global business. According to U.S. prosecutors and the DEA, they secured...
The empire was maintained through a combination of logistics, corruption, intimidation and extreme violence. U.S. authorities allege that Los Chapitos employed armed sicarios to protect laboratories, trafficking routes and leadership, while kidnapping, torturing or killing people who interfered with the operation. Once fentanyl reached the United States, distribution networks moved pills and powder across the country, while proceeds were funneled back to Mexico through bulk cash, trade-based laundering and cryptocurrency. DEA officials have described the Chapitos organization as one of the largest and most prolific fentanyl-trafficking operations in the world, with control extending from the acquisition of raw chemicals all the way through street-level distribution and money laundering. In effect, they did not simply add fentanyl to an existing cartel portfolio; they industrialized it, using the Sinaloa Cartel’s infrastructure to build a high-volume synthetic-drug enterprise capable of producing enormous quantities at comparatively low cost.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2874breakingnews,buzzfeedunsolvedtruecrime,news,truecrime,truecrimeaddict,truecrimeallthetime,truecrimeandchill,truecrimebooks,truecrimecommunity,truecrimefan,truecrimegarage,truecrimejunkie,truecrimeobsessed,truecrimepodcast,truecrimepodcasts,truecrimereport,truecrimes,truecrimestoriestruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-the-affidavit-that-was-brought-before-the-court-10-27-26--76004936
Cellphone records provided another major component of the affidavit. Investigators said Kohberger’s phone left the area of his Pullman residence shortly before 2:47 a.m. and then stopped reporting to the cellular network until 4:48 a.m., a gap that encompassed the estimated time of the murders. When the phone reconnected, records showed it traveling south of Moscow and then taking a circuitous route back toward Pullman, generally consistent with the movements investigators attributed to the white Elantra. The affidavit also said Kohberger’s phone had used cellular resources covering the King Road area on at least 12 occasions before the murders, almost all during late-night or early-morning hours, and returned to coverage of the neighborhood between approximately 9:12 and 9:21 a.m. on the morning after the killings. Taken together, prosecutors argued that the sheath DNA, vehicle surveillance, phone records and eyewitness description established probable cause to charge Kohberger with four counts of first-degree murder and one count of burglary, leading to the arrest warrant issued December 29, 2022.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76004936Tue, 27 Oct 2026 08:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe probable-cause affidavit used to secure Bryan Kohberger’s arrest laid out how investigators connected him to the November 13, 2022 murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin through a combination of DNA,...
Cellphone records provided another major component of the affidavit. Investigators said Kohberger’s phone left the area of his Pullman residence shortly before 2:47 a.m. and then stopped reporting to the cellular network until 4:48 a.m., a gap that encompassed the estimated time of the murders. When the phone reconnected, records showed it traveling south of Moscow and then taking a circuitous route back toward Pullman, generally consistent with the movements investigators attributed to the white Elantra. The affidavit also said Kohberger’s phone had used cellular resources covering the King Road area on at least 12 occasions before the murders, almost all during late-night or early-morning hours, and returned to coverage of the neighborhood between approximately 9:12 and 9:21 a.m. on the morning after the killings. Taken together, prosecutors argued that the sheath DNA, vehicle surveillance, phone records and eyewitness description established probable cause to charge Kohberger with four counts of first-degree murder and one count of burglary, leading to the arrest warrant issued December 29, 2022.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2945bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-danny-masterson-and-the-mistrial-10-26-26--76005161
The final jury split showed that prosecutors had fallen well short of unanimous convictions in the first trial. On the three counts, only two jurors favored conviction on one charge, four favored conviction on another, and five favored conviction on the third, meaning a majority of the panel was leaning toward acquittal on every count. Scientology played a major role throughout the proceedings because all three accusers had been members of the church and testified that its policies and pressure affected how and when they reported Masterson. Prosecutors argued that Masterson’s status within Scientology helped shield him from accountability, while the church denied discouraging victims from reporting crimes. The mistrial did not end the prosecution, however; Los Angeles County prosecutors chose to retry Masterson, leading to his 2023 conviction on two of the three counts.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76005161Tue, 27 Oct 2026 06:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDanny Masterson’s first rape trial ended in a mistrial on November 30, 2022, after a Los Angeles jury said it could not reach unanimous verdicts on any of the three counts against him. Masterson had been accused of raping three women at his Hollywood...
The final jury split showed that prosecutors had fallen well short of unanimous convictions in the first trial. On the three counts, only two jurors favored conviction on one charge, four favored conviction on another, and five favored conviction on the third, meaning a majority of the panel was leaning toward acquittal on every count. Scientology played a major role throughout the proceedings because all three accusers had been members of the church and testified that its policies and pressure affected how and when they reported Masterson. Prosecutors argued that Masterson’s status within Scientology helped shield him from accountability, while the church denied discouraging victims from reporting crimes. The mistrial did not end the prosecution, however; Los Angeles County prosecutors chose to retry Masterson, leading to his 2023 conviction on two of the three counts.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2491breakingnews,buzzfeedunsolvedtruecrime,news,truecrime,truecrimeaddict,truecrimeallthetime,truecrimeandchill,truecrimebooks,truecrimecommunity,truecrimefan,truecrimegarage,truecrimejunkie,truecrimeobsessed,truecrimepodcast,truecrimepodcasts,truecrimereport,truecrimes,truecrimestoriestruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-bryan-kohberger-and-the-door-that-was-allegedly-ajar--76004900
Moscow Police Chief James Fry said the report was news to him when asked about it and declined to confirm whether investigators had verified the neighbor’s account. The disclosure came during a period when police were still working through witness statements, surveillance footage and physical evidence while searching for a white Hyundai Elantra believed to have been near the home around the time of the murders. The open-door report was never presented publicly as a confirmed part of the prosecution’s case, but it added another unanswered question to the chaotic hours between the killings and the eventual 911 call.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76004900Tue, 27 Oct 2026 04:20:03 +0000Bobby CapucciA potentially significant detail emerged in the early investigation into the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin when a neighbor said the front door of the King Road residence was standing open around 8:30 a.m....
Moscow Police Chief James Fry said the report was news to him when asked about it and declined to confirm whether investigators had verified the neighbor’s account. The disclosure came during a period when police were still working through witness statements, surveillance footage and physical evidence while searching for a white Hyundai Elantra believed to have been near the home around the time of the murders. The open-door report was never presented publicly as a confirmed part of the prosecution’s case, but it added another unanswered question to the chaotic hours between the killings and the eventual 911 call.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1069bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-bryan-kohberger-and-the-fudged-resume--76004740

According to Kohberger, he was a skilled fish filet maestro and was also a proficient boxer and debate champion. It would seem that he was not truthful here however, considering that he only worked at the camp for three weeks and was never taught how to filet fish there.


In this episode, we take a look at Kohberger's resume and his past employment history as the investigation into the Moscow Murders and the man the goverment says is responsible rolls on.




to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


soruce:

Bryan Kohberger describes cutting fish, wrapping meat in creepy self-assessment | Fox News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76004740Tue, 27 Oct 2026 02:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBryan Kohberger applied and was given a job with the school district in his hometown. On the resume that he submitted to try and get that job, he might have played a little loose with the truth. According to Kohberger, he was a skilled fish filet...

According to Kohberger, he was a skilled fish filet maestro and was also a proficient boxer and debate champion. It would seem that he was not truthful here however, considering that he only worked at the camp for three weeks and was never taught how to filet fish there.


In this episode, we take a look at Kohberger's resume and his past employment history as the investigation into the Moscow Murders and the man the goverment says is responsible rolls on.




to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


soruce:

Bryan Kohberger describes cutting fish, wrapping meat in creepy self-assessment | Fox News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>615bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-day-6-part-1-10-26-26--76001700
The defense concentrated much of its closing argument on the aggravating circumstance that could keep the aggravated-murder charge death-penalty eligible: whether the shooter knowingly created a great risk of death to someone other than Kirk. Attorney Staci Visser stressed that there had been one shot, one bullet and one person struck, arguing that prosecutors were stretching possible dangers—such as a miss, ricochet or pass-through bullet—into proof that another person had actually been placed within the legally required “zone of danger.” Richard Novak separately challenged the state’s evidence concerning political motivation and whether Robinson could reasonably have known children were present. Prosecutor Chad Grunander answered that argument by describing the shot as “ballistic roulette,” emphasizing that Kirk was surrounded by security personnel, a questioner and thousands of spectators and arguing that a slight error in aim could easily have killed someone else. The fundamental dispute at closing was therefore not simply whether the state could identify Robinson as the alleged shooter, but whether prosecutors had established the aggravating circumstances and enhancements necessary to carry the entire case—including its potential death penalty—forward to trial.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/76001700Tue, 27 Oct 2026 00:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay six of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing, held September 1, 2026, centered on closing arguments and the prosecution’s claim that the evidence easily cleared Utah’s probable-cause standard. Deputy Utah County Attorney Ryan McBride argued that...
The defense concentrated much of its closing argument on the aggravating circumstance that could keep the aggravated-murder charge death-penalty eligible: whether the shooter knowingly created a great risk of death to someone other than Kirk. Attorney Staci Visser stressed that there had been one shot, one bullet and one person struck, arguing that prosecutors were stretching possible dangers—such as a miss, ricochet or pass-through bullet—into proof that another person had actually been placed within the legally required “zone of danger.” Richard Novak separately challenged the state’s evidence concerning political motivation and whether Robinson could reasonably have known children were present. Prosecutor Chad Grunander answered that argument by describing the shot as “ballistic roulette,” emphasizing that Kirk was surrounded by security personnel, a questioner and thousands of spectators and arguing that a slight error in aim could easily have killed someone else. The fundamental dispute at closing was therefore not simply whether the state could identify Robinson as the alleged shooter, but whether prosecutors had established the aggravating circumstances and enhancements necessary to carry the entire case—including its potential death penalty—forward to trial.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>659breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/virginia-roberts-and-her-2nd-supplemental-response-to-maxwell-s-discovery-request-part-2-10-26-26--75999417
Giuffre nevertheless agreed to continue producing non-privileged responsive records, repeatedly noting that she had already turned over documents Bates-numbered GIUFFRE000001 through GIUFFRE005353 and would supplement those productions. At the same time, she drew hard lines around particularly sensitive material, withholding privileged documents, information connected to ongoing law-enforcement investigations and photographs revealing the faces of her minor children. She also argued that Maxwell was demanding some information that was already within Maxwell’s or Epstein’s possession while Maxwell herself was asserting privilege over related material. One of Maxwell’s broadest requests sought virtually every communication from 1998 forward concerning Maxwell, Epstein, Dershowitz, Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton and other identified individuals; Giuffre objected that such a demand swept far beyond what was reasonably necessary for the defamation case. Taken as a whole, the filing showed how fiercely the two sides were battling over discovery in 2016: Maxwell was attempting to probe nearly every aspect of Giuffre’s allegations, history and relationships, while Giuffre was cooperating with document production but arguing that Maxwell’s lawyers were using discovery to intrude into areas that had little legitimate connection to the claims being litigated.


to ontact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75999417Mon, 26 Oct 2026 22:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn her April 29, 2016 second amended supplemental discovery response, Virginia Giuffre pushed back aggressively against Ghislaine Maxwell’s effort to obtain an enormous range of information about her personal life, allegations, relationships and...
Giuffre nevertheless agreed to continue producing non-privileged responsive records, repeatedly noting that she had already turned over documents Bates-numbered GIUFFRE000001 through GIUFFRE005353 and would supplement those productions. At the same time, she drew hard lines around particularly sensitive material, withholding privileged documents, information connected to ongoing law-enforcement investigations and photographs revealing the faces of her minor children. She also argued that Maxwell was demanding some information that was already within Maxwell’s or Epstein’s possession while Maxwell herself was asserting privilege over related material. One of Maxwell’s broadest requests sought virtually every communication from 1998 forward concerning Maxwell, Epstein, Dershowitz, Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton and other identified individuals; Giuffre objected that such a demand swept far beyond what was reasonably necessary for the defamation case. Taken as a whole, the filing showed how fiercely the two sides were battling over discovery in 2016: Maxwell was attempting to probe nearly every aspect of Giuffre’s allegations, history and relationships, while Giuffre was cooperating with document production but arguing that Maxwell’s lawyers were using discovery to intrude into areas that had little legitimate connection to the claims being litigated.


to ontact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>749epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/virginia-roberts-and-her-2nd-supplemental-response-to-maxwell-s-discovery-request-part-1-10-26-26--75999414
Giuffre nevertheless agreed to continue producing non-privileged responsive records, repeatedly noting that she had already turned over documents Bates-numbered GIUFFRE000001 through GIUFFRE005353 and would supplement those productions. At the same time, she drew hard lines around particularly sensitive material, withholding privileged documents, information connected to ongoing law-enforcement investigations and photographs revealing the faces of her minor children. She also argued that Maxwell was demanding some information that was already within Maxwell’s or Epstein’s possession while Maxwell herself was asserting privilege over related material. One of Maxwell’s broadest requests sought virtually every communication from 1998 forward concerning Maxwell, Epstein, Dershowitz, Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton and other identified individuals; Giuffre objected that such a demand swept far beyond what was reasonably necessary for the defamation case. Taken as a whole, the filing showed how fiercely the two sides were battling over discovery in 2016: Maxwell was attempting to probe nearly every aspect of Giuffre’s allegations, history and relationships, while Giuffre was cooperating with document production but arguing that Maxwell’s lawyers were using discovery to intrude into areas that had little legitimate connection to the claims being litigated.


to ontact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75999414Mon, 26 Oct 2026 20:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn her April 29, 2016 second amended supplemental discovery response, Virginia Giuffre pushed back aggressively against Ghislaine Maxwell’s effort to obtain an enormous range of information about her personal life, allegations, relationships and...
Giuffre nevertheless agreed to continue producing non-privileged responsive records, repeatedly noting that she had already turned over documents Bates-numbered GIUFFRE000001 through GIUFFRE005353 and would supplement those productions. At the same time, she drew hard lines around particularly sensitive material, withholding privileged documents, information connected to ongoing law-enforcement investigations and photographs revealing the faces of her minor children. She also argued that Maxwell was demanding some information that was already within Maxwell’s or Epstein’s possession while Maxwell herself was asserting privilege over related material. One of Maxwell’s broadest requests sought virtually every communication from 1998 forward concerning Maxwell, Epstein, Dershowitz, Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton and other identified individuals; Giuffre objected that such a demand swept far beyond what was reasonably necessary for the defamation case. Taken as a whole, the filing showed how fiercely the two sides were battling over discovery in 2016: Maxwell was attempting to probe nearly every aspect of Giuffre’s allegations, history and relationships, while Giuffre was cooperating with document production but arguing that Maxwell’s lawyers were using discovery to intrude into areas that had little legitimate connection to the claims being litigated.


to ontact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>883epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-epstein-files-expose-how-prematurely-doj-tried-to-close-the-case-part-2-10-26-26--75999480
That is where the administration’s handling becomes so hard to defend. Trump repeatedly dismissed the Epstein controversy as a hoax and mocked people who kept pressing for answers, while his own Justice Department was sitting on millions of pages that later generated new investigations in the United States and overseas. The administration’s defenders have since tried to move the goalposts by arguing that the released files do not automatically prove crimes, but that was never the question. The question was whether there were still credible leads, witnesses, financial trails, records, and third parties worth investigating, and the answer from New Mexico, Congress, France, and Britain has plainly been yes. The federal government told the public the road had ended, then watched other investigators walk straight past the supposed dead end using material that came out of federal files. At that point, the contradiction was no longer theoretical. Washington claimed the case had been picked clean, but once Congress forced the door open, investigators immediately found more rooms to search.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75999480Mon, 26 Oct 2026 18:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn July 2025, the DOJ and FBI tried to close the book on Jeffrey Epstein by claiming they had found no incriminating client list, no credible blackmail evidence, and nothing that could justify investigations of uncharged third parties. That posture...
That is where the administration’s handling becomes so hard to defend. Trump repeatedly dismissed the Epstein controversy as a hoax and mocked people who kept pressing for answers, while his own Justice Department was sitting on millions of pages that later generated new investigations in the United States and overseas. The administration’s defenders have since tried to move the goalposts by arguing that the released files do not automatically prove crimes, but that was never the question. The question was whether there were still credible leads, witnesses, financial trails, records, and third parties worth investigating, and the answer from New Mexico, Congress, France, and Britain has plainly been yes. The federal government told the public the road had ended, then watched other investigators walk straight past the supposed dead end using material that came out of federal files. At that point, the contradiction was no longer theoretical. Washington claimed the case had been picked clean, but once Congress forced the door open, investigators immediately found more rooms to search.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1087epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-epstein-files-expose-how-prematurely-doj-tried-to-close-the-case-part-1-10-26-26--75999481
That is where the administration’s handling becomes so hard to defend. Trump repeatedly dismissed the Epstein controversy as a hoax and mocked people who kept pressing for answers, while his own Justice Department was sitting on millions of pages that later generated new investigations in the United States and overseas. The administration’s defenders have since tried to move the goalposts by arguing that the released files do not automatically prove crimes, but that was never the question. The question was whether there were still credible leads, witnesses, financial trails, records, and third parties worth investigating, and the answer from New Mexico, Congress, France, and Britain has plainly been yes. The federal government told the public the road had ended, then watched other investigators walk straight past the supposed dead end using material that came out of federal files. At that point, the contradiction was no longer theoretical. Washington claimed the case had been picked clean, but once Congress forced the door open, investigators immediately found more rooms to search.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75999481Mon, 26 Oct 2026 16:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciIn July 2025, the DOJ and FBI tried to close the book on Jeffrey Epstein by claiming they had found no incriminating client list, no credible blackmail evidence, and nothing that could justify investigations of uncharged third parties. That posture...
That is where the administration’s handling becomes so hard to defend. Trump repeatedly dismissed the Epstein controversy as a hoax and mocked people who kept pressing for answers, while his own Justice Department was sitting on millions of pages that later generated new investigations in the United States and overseas. The administration’s defenders have since tried to move the goalposts by arguing that the released files do not automatically prove crimes, but that was never the question. The question was whether there were still credible leads, witnesses, financial trails, records, and third parties worth investigating, and the answer from New Mexico, Congress, France, and Britain has plainly been yes. The federal government told the public the road had ended, then watched other investigators walk straight past the supposed dead end using material that came out of federal files. At that point, the contradiction was no longer theoretical. Washington claimed the case had been picked clean, but once Congress forced the door open, investigators immediately found more rooms to search.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>742epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/epstein-survivors-win-class-certification-against-firstbank-puerto-rico-10-26-26--75999450
The ruling did not find FirstBank liable, but it represented an important procedural breakthrough because survivors would now be able to pursue their claims collectively rather than being forced to litigate individual cases against the bank. Rakoff had already refused to dismiss the central claim alleging that FirstBank participated in a trafficking venture under the federal Trafficking Victims Protection Act, although he dismissed a separate claim accusing the bank of obstructing enforcement of the law. FirstBank opposed class certification and has denied the allegations, but the case will now move forward toward discovery and potentially trial or settlement with a class covering more than two decades of Epstein’s abuse. The case continued the widening effort to hold Epstein’s financial institutions accountable on the theory that his trafficking operation could not have functioned on its enormous scale without banks willing to provide accounts, move money and maintain financial relationships despite the red flags surrounding him.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75999450Mon, 26 Oct 2026 14:29:43 +0000Bobby CapucciA federal judge handed Jeffrey Epstein survivors a significant legal victory by certifying a class-action lawsuit against FirstBank Puerto Rico and its parent company, First BanCorp. Judge Jed Rakoff ruled on October 20 that the case could proceed on...
The ruling did not find FirstBank liable, but it represented an important procedural breakthrough because survivors would now be able to pursue their claims collectively rather than being forced to litigate individual cases against the bank. Rakoff had already refused to dismiss the central claim alleging that FirstBank participated in a trafficking venture under the federal Trafficking Victims Protection Act, although he dismissed a separate claim accusing the bank of obstructing enforcement of the law. FirstBank opposed class certification and has denied the allegations, but the case will now move forward toward discovery and potentially trial or settlement with a class covering more than two decades of Epstein’s abuse. The case continued the widening effort to hold Epstein’s financial institutions accountable on the theory that his trafficking operation could not have functioned on its enormous scale without banks willing to provide accounts, move money and maintain financial relationships despite the red flags surrounding him.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>615epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bill-clinton-and-the-epstein-related-congressional-transcript-part-10-12-10-26-26--75976459Bill Clinton’s February 27, 2026 testimony before the House Oversight Committee finally forced him to answer under oath about a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that had generated questions for decades, but the proceeding hardly delivered the kind of exhaustive accounting the public had been promised. Clinton insisted that he had “done nothing wrong,” knew nothing about Epstein’s abuse and never witnessed anything that caused him concern, effectively asking lawmakers to accept that his repeated contact with Epstein, travel aboard Epstein’s aircraft and proximity to Ghislaine Maxwell never exposed him to anything suspicious. That explanation deserved considerably more scrutiny than it received. Clinton had not volunteered for the deposition either. He resisted the committee’s subpoena, failed to appear for a scheduled January 13 deposition and only agreed to testify after a bipartisan contempt resolution advanced against him. Yet when he finally appeared, even some lawmakers who had spent months demanding answers quickly described him as cooperative and candid. The central problem remained unresolved: Clinton’s defense depended heavily on what he claimed not to have seen, not to have known and not to remember, while the documentary record established that his association with Epstein was substantial enough to demand far more than a polite acceptance of those denials.

The congressional process itself also exposed the weaknesses that have plagued nearly every official examination of Epstein’s network. Rather than methodically reconstructing Clinton’s relationship with Epstein against flight records, photographs, visitor records, witness accounts and contemporaneous communications, the deposition became entangled in the same partisan warfare that repeatedly consumes the Epstein investigation. Republicans emphasized Clinton while Democrats complained that Donald Trump had not been subpoenaed, and Chairman James Comer immediately used Clinton’s answers to make political claims about Trump rather than keeping the focus exclusively on Epstein and the unanswered questions surrounding Clinton himself. Clinton’s testimony therefore produced another familiar outcome: a powerful person denied knowledge of Epstein’s crimes, lawmakers divided themselves into political camps, and very little was done to independently test how plausible those denials actually were. Clinton’s appearance was historically significant because Congress compelled a former president to testify, but significance should not be confused with accountability. After years of questions about one of the most prominent men in Epstein’s orbit, the public was still largely left with Clinton’s version of events and a congressional process that appeared more interested in scoring partisan points than aggressively determining whether that version could withstand sustained scrutiny.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75976459Mon, 26 Oct 2026 12:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBill Clinton’s February 27, 2026 testimony before the House Oversight Committee finally forced him to answer under oath about a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that had generated questions for decades, but the proceeding hardly delivered the kind of...Bill Clinton’s February 27, 2026 testimony before the House Oversight Committee finally forced him to answer under oath about a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that had generated questions for decades, but the proceeding hardly delivered the kind of exhaustive accounting the public had been promised. Clinton insisted that he had “done nothing wrong,” knew nothing about Epstein’s abuse and never witnessed anything that caused him concern, effectively asking lawmakers to accept that his repeated contact with Epstein, travel aboard Epstein’s aircraft and proximity to Ghislaine Maxwell never exposed him to anything suspicious. That explanation deserved considerably more scrutiny than it received. Clinton had not volunteered for the deposition either. He resisted the committee’s subpoena, failed to appear for a scheduled January 13 deposition and only agreed to testify after a bipartisan contempt resolution advanced against him. Yet when he finally appeared, even some lawmakers who had spent months demanding answers quickly described him as cooperative and candid. The central problem remained unresolved: Clinton’s defense depended heavily on what he claimed not to have seen, not to have known and not to remember, while the documentary record established that his association with Epstein was substantial enough to demand far more than a polite acceptance of those denials.

The congressional process itself also exposed the weaknesses that have plagued nearly every official examination of Epstein’s network. Rather than methodically reconstructing Clinton’s relationship with Epstein against flight records, photographs, visitor records, witness accounts and contemporaneous communications, the deposition became entangled in the same partisan warfare that repeatedly consumes the Epstein investigation. Republicans emphasized Clinton while Democrats complained that Donald Trump had not been subpoenaed, and Chairman James Comer immediately used Clinton’s answers to make political claims about Trump rather than keeping the focus exclusively on Epstein and the unanswered questions surrounding Clinton himself. Clinton’s testimony therefore produced another familiar outcome: a powerful person denied knowledge of Epstein’s crimes, lawmakers divided themselves into political camps, and very little was done to independently test how plausible those denials actually were. Clinton’s appearance was historically significant because Congress compelled a former president to testify, but significance should not be confused with accountability. After years of questions about one of the most prominent men in Epstein’s orbit, the public was still largely left with Clinton’s version of events and a congressional process that appeared more interested in scoring partisan points than aggressively determining whether that version could withstand sustained scrutiny.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3038epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bill-clinton-and-the-epstein-related-congressional-transcript-part-7-9-10-26-26--75976460Bill Clinton’s February 27, 2026 testimony before the House Oversight Committee finally forced him to answer under oath about a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that had generated questions for decades, but the proceeding hardly delivered the kind of exhaustive accounting the public had been promised. Clinton insisted that he had “done nothing wrong,” knew nothing about Epstein’s abuse and never witnessed anything that caused him concern, effectively asking lawmakers to accept that his repeated contact with Epstein, travel aboard Epstein’s aircraft and proximity to Ghislaine Maxwell never exposed him to anything suspicious. That explanation deserved considerably more scrutiny than it received. Clinton had not volunteered for the deposition either. He resisted the committee’s subpoena, failed to appear for a scheduled January 13 deposition and only agreed to testify after a bipartisan contempt resolution advanced against him. Yet when he finally appeared, even some lawmakers who had spent months demanding answers quickly described him as cooperative and candid. The central problem remained unresolved: Clinton’s defense depended heavily on what he claimed not to have seen, not to have known and not to remember, while the documentary record established that his association with Epstein was substantial enough to demand far more than a polite acceptance of those denials.

The congressional process itself also exposed the weaknesses that have plagued nearly every official examination of Epstein’s network. Rather than methodically reconstructing Clinton’s relationship with Epstein against flight records, photographs, visitor records, witness accounts and contemporaneous communications, the deposition became entangled in the same partisan warfare that repeatedly consumes the Epstein investigation. Republicans emphasized Clinton while Democrats complained that Donald Trump had not been subpoenaed, and Chairman James Comer immediately used Clinton’s answers to make political claims about Trump rather than keeping the focus exclusively on Epstein and the unanswered questions surrounding Clinton himself. Clinton’s testimony therefore produced another familiar outcome: a powerful person denied knowledge of Epstein’s crimes, lawmakers divided themselves into political camps, and very little was done to independently test how plausible those denials actually were. Clinton’s appearance was historically significant because Congress compelled a former president to testify, but significance should not be confused with accountability. After years of questions about one of the most prominent men in Epstein’s orbit, the public was still largely left with Clinton’s version of events and a congressional process that appeared more interested in scoring partisan points than aggressively determining whether that version could withstand sustained scrutiny.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75976460Mon, 26 Oct 2026 10:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBill Clinton’s February 27, 2026 testimony before the House Oversight Committee finally forced him to answer under oath about a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that had generated questions for decades, but the proceeding hardly delivered the kind of...Bill Clinton’s February 27, 2026 testimony before the House Oversight Committee finally forced him to answer under oath about a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that had generated questions for decades, but the proceeding hardly delivered the kind of exhaustive accounting the public had been promised. Clinton insisted that he had “done nothing wrong,” knew nothing about Epstein’s abuse and never witnessed anything that caused him concern, effectively asking lawmakers to accept that his repeated contact with Epstein, travel aboard Epstein’s aircraft and proximity to Ghislaine Maxwell never exposed him to anything suspicious. That explanation deserved considerably more scrutiny than it received. Clinton had not volunteered for the deposition either. He resisted the committee’s subpoena, failed to appear for a scheduled January 13 deposition and only agreed to testify after a bipartisan contempt resolution advanced against him. Yet when he finally appeared, even some lawmakers who had spent months demanding answers quickly described him as cooperative and candid. The central problem remained unresolved: Clinton’s defense depended heavily on what he claimed not to have seen, not to have known and not to remember, while the documentary record established that his association with Epstein was substantial enough to demand far more than a polite acceptance of those denials.

The congressional process itself also exposed the weaknesses that have plagued nearly every official examination of Epstein’s network. Rather than methodically reconstructing Clinton’s relationship with Epstein against flight records, photographs, visitor records, witness accounts and contemporaneous communications, the deposition became entangled in the same partisan warfare that repeatedly consumes the Epstein investigation. Republicans emphasized Clinton while Democrats complained that Donald Trump had not been subpoenaed, and Chairman James Comer immediately used Clinton’s answers to make political claims about Trump rather than keeping the focus exclusively on Epstein and the unanswered questions surrounding Clinton himself. Clinton’s testimony therefore produced another familiar outcome: a powerful person denied knowledge of Epstein’s crimes, lawmakers divided themselves into political camps, and very little was done to independently test how plausible those denials actually were. Clinton’s appearance was historically significant because Congress compelled a former president to testify, but significance should not be confused with accountability. After years of questions about one of the most prominent men in Epstein’s orbit, the public was still largely left with Clinton’s version of events and a congressional process that appeared more interested in scoring partisan points than aggressively determining whether that version could withstand sustained scrutiny.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2585epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bill-clinton-and-the-epstein-related-congressional-transcript-part-4-6-10-26-26--75976461Bill Clinton’s February 27, 2026 testimony before the House Oversight Committee finally forced him to answer under oath about a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that had generated questions for decades, but the proceeding hardly delivered the kind of exhaustive accounting the public had been promised. Clinton insisted that he had “done nothing wrong,” knew nothing about Epstein’s abuse and never witnessed anything that caused him concern, effectively asking lawmakers to accept that his repeated contact with Epstein, travel aboard Epstein’s aircraft and proximity to Ghislaine Maxwell never exposed him to anything suspicious. That explanation deserved considerably more scrutiny than it received. Clinton had not volunteered for the deposition either. He resisted the committee’s subpoena, failed to appear for a scheduled January 13 deposition and only agreed to testify after a bipartisan contempt resolution advanced against him. Yet when he finally appeared, even some lawmakers who had spent months demanding answers quickly described him as cooperative and candid. The central problem remained unresolved: Clinton’s defense depended heavily on what he claimed not to have seen, not to have known and not to remember, while the documentary record established that his association with Epstein was substantial enough to demand far more than a polite acceptance of those denials.

The congressional process itself also exposed the weaknesses that have plagued nearly every official examination of Epstein’s network. Rather than methodically reconstructing Clinton’s relationship with Epstein against flight records, photographs, visitor records, witness accounts and contemporaneous communications, the deposition became entangled in the same partisan warfare that repeatedly consumes the Epstein investigation. Republicans emphasized Clinton while Democrats complained that Donald Trump had not been subpoenaed, and Chairman James Comer immediately used Clinton’s answers to make political claims about Trump rather than keeping the focus exclusively on Epstein and the unanswered questions surrounding Clinton himself. Clinton’s testimony therefore produced another familiar outcome: a powerful person denied knowledge of Epstein’s crimes, lawmakers divided themselves into political camps, and very little was done to independently test how plausible those denials actually were. Clinton’s appearance was historically significant because Congress compelled a former president to testify, but significance should not be confused with accountability. After years of questions about one of the most prominent men in Epstein’s orbit, the public was still largely left with Clinton’s version of events and a congressional process that appeared more interested in scoring partisan points than aggressively determining whether that version could withstand sustained scrutiny.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75976461Mon, 26 Oct 2026 08:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBill Clinton’s February 27, 2026 testimony before the House Oversight Committee finally forced him to answer under oath about a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that had generated questions for decades, but the proceeding hardly delivered the kind of...Bill Clinton’s February 27, 2026 testimony before the House Oversight Committee finally forced him to answer under oath about a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that had generated questions for decades, but the proceeding hardly delivered the kind of exhaustive accounting the public had been promised. Clinton insisted that he had “done nothing wrong,” knew nothing about Epstein’s abuse and never witnessed anything that caused him concern, effectively asking lawmakers to accept that his repeated contact with Epstein, travel aboard Epstein’s aircraft and proximity to Ghislaine Maxwell never exposed him to anything suspicious. That explanation deserved considerably more scrutiny than it received. Clinton had not volunteered for the deposition either. He resisted the committee’s subpoena, failed to appear for a scheduled January 13 deposition and only agreed to testify after a bipartisan contempt resolution advanced against him. Yet when he finally appeared, even some lawmakers who had spent months demanding answers quickly described him as cooperative and candid. The central problem remained unresolved: Clinton’s defense depended heavily on what he claimed not to have seen, not to have known and not to remember, while the documentary record established that his association with Epstein was substantial enough to demand far more than a polite acceptance of those denials.

The congressional process itself also exposed the weaknesses that have plagued nearly every official examination of Epstein’s network. Rather than methodically reconstructing Clinton’s relationship with Epstein against flight records, photographs, visitor records, witness accounts and contemporaneous communications, the deposition became entangled in the same partisan warfare that repeatedly consumes the Epstein investigation. Republicans emphasized Clinton while Democrats complained that Donald Trump had not been subpoenaed, and Chairman James Comer immediately used Clinton’s answers to make political claims about Trump rather than keeping the focus exclusively on Epstein and the unanswered questions surrounding Clinton himself. Clinton’s testimony therefore produced another familiar outcome: a powerful person denied knowledge of Epstein’s crimes, lawmakers divided themselves into political camps, and very little was done to independently test how plausible those denials actually were. Clinton’s appearance was historically significant because Congress compelled a former president to testify, but significance should not be confused with accountability. After years of questions about one of the most prominent men in Epstein’s orbit, the public was still largely left with Clinton’s version of events and a congressional process that appeared more interested in scoring partisan points than aggressively determining whether that version could withstand sustained scrutiny.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2565epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bill-clinton-and-the-epstein-related-congressional-transcript-part-1-3-10-26-26--75976458Bill Clinton’s February 27, 2026 testimony before the House Oversight Committee finally forced him to answer under oath about a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that had generated questions for decades, but the proceeding hardly delivered the kind of exhaustive accounting the public had been promised. Clinton insisted that he had “done nothing wrong,” knew nothing about Epstein’s abuse and never witnessed anything that caused him concern, effectively asking lawmakers to accept that his repeated contact with Epstein, travel aboard Epstein’s aircraft and proximity to Ghislaine Maxwell never exposed him to anything suspicious. That explanation deserved considerably more scrutiny than it received. Clinton had not volunteered for the deposition either. He resisted the committee’s subpoena, failed to appear for a scheduled January 13 deposition and only agreed to testify after a bipartisan contempt resolution advanced against him. Yet when he finally appeared, even some lawmakers who had spent months demanding answers quickly described him as cooperative and candid. The central problem remained unresolved: Clinton’s defense depended heavily on what he claimed not to have seen, not to have known and not to remember, while the documentary record established that his association with Epstein was substantial enough to demand far more than a polite acceptance of those denials.

The congressional process itself also exposed the weaknesses that have plagued nearly every official examination of Epstein’s network. Rather than methodically reconstructing Clinton’s relationship with Epstein against flight records, photographs, visitor records, witness accounts and contemporaneous communications, the deposition became entangled in the same partisan warfare that repeatedly consumes the Epstein investigation. Republicans emphasized Clinton while Democrats complained that Donald Trump had not been subpoenaed, and Chairman James Comer immediately used Clinton’s answers to make political claims about Trump rather than keeping the focus exclusively on Epstein and the unanswered questions surrounding Clinton himself. Clinton’s testimony therefore produced another familiar outcome: a powerful person denied knowledge of Epstein’s crimes, lawmakers divided themselves into political camps, and very little was done to independently test how plausible those denials actually were. Clinton’s appearance was historically significant because Congress compelled a former president to testify, but significance should not be confused with accountability. After years of questions about one of the most prominent men in Epstein’s orbit, the public was still largely left with Clinton’s version of events and a congressional process that appeared more interested in scoring partisan points than aggressively determining whether that version could withstand sustained scrutiny.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75976458Mon, 26 Oct 2026 06:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBill Clinton’s February 27, 2026 testimony before the House Oversight Committee finally forced him to answer under oath about a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that had generated questions for decades, but the proceeding hardly delivered the kind of...Bill Clinton’s February 27, 2026 testimony before the House Oversight Committee finally forced him to answer under oath about a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that had generated questions for decades, but the proceeding hardly delivered the kind of exhaustive accounting the public had been promised. Clinton insisted that he had “done nothing wrong,” knew nothing about Epstein’s abuse and never witnessed anything that caused him concern, effectively asking lawmakers to accept that his repeated contact with Epstein, travel aboard Epstein’s aircraft and proximity to Ghislaine Maxwell never exposed him to anything suspicious. That explanation deserved considerably more scrutiny than it received. Clinton had not volunteered for the deposition either. He resisted the committee’s subpoena, failed to appear for a scheduled January 13 deposition and only agreed to testify after a bipartisan contempt resolution advanced against him. Yet when he finally appeared, even some lawmakers who had spent months demanding answers quickly described him as cooperative and candid. The central problem remained unresolved: Clinton’s defense depended heavily on what he claimed not to have seen, not to have known and not to remember, while the documentary record established that his association with Epstein was substantial enough to demand far more than a polite acceptance of those denials.

The congressional process itself also exposed the weaknesses that have plagued nearly every official examination of Epstein’s network. Rather than methodically reconstructing Clinton’s relationship with Epstein against flight records, photographs, visitor records, witness accounts and contemporaneous communications, the deposition became entangled in the same partisan warfare that repeatedly consumes the Epstein investigation. Republicans emphasized Clinton while Democrats complained that Donald Trump had not been subpoenaed, and Chairman James Comer immediately used Clinton’s answers to make political claims about Trump rather than keeping the focus exclusively on Epstein and the unanswered questions surrounding Clinton himself. Clinton’s testimony therefore produced another familiar outcome: a powerful person denied knowledge of Epstein’s crimes, lawmakers divided themselves into political camps, and very little was done to independently test how plausible those denials actually were. Clinton’s appearance was historically significant because Congress compelled a former president to testify, but significance should not be confused with accountability. After years of questions about one of the most prominent men in Epstein’s orbit, the public was still largely left with Clinton’s version of events and a congressional process that appeared more interested in scoring partisan points than aggressively determining whether that version could withstand sustained scrutiny.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2443epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/leon-black-s-team-quietly-pressured-federal-judge-in-epstein-survivor-case-part-2--75965797Leon Black has faced mounting scrutiny over his long and deeply intertwined relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, particularly after newly surfaced court filings revealed an aggressive behind-the-scenes legal effort tied to a woman accusing Black of rape connected to Epstein’s network. According to the reporting, Black’s legal team privately contacted federal Judge Jed Rakoff in an effort to challenge and ultimately reverse a multimillion-dollar compensation award granted to the accuser through an Epstein victims’ settlement fund. The woman, identified as Jane Doe, alleged that Black sexually assaulted her as a teenager at Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse. The Guardian’s reporting detailed how Black’s attorneys argued the settlement process had been manipulated by fraudulent evidence and sought to protect Black’s reputation from what they characterized as false allegations. Critics, however, argued the case highlighted how wealthy and powerful figures connected to Epstein continue to wield enormous legal and financial influence long after Epstein’s death.

The legal battle became even more controversial after a federal judge sanctioned Jane Doe and her former attorney for falsified evidence tied to parts of the case, though the court still allowed portions of the civil rape lawsuit against Black to proceed. Black has vehemently denied ever meeting or assaulting the accuser and has refused settlement offers, framing the allegations as entirely fabricated. Still, the broader controversy surrounding Black has persisted because of the extraordinary extent of his documented relationship with Epstein, including revelations that Black paid Epstein roughly $170 million for financial and tax-related services over several years despite Epstein already being a convicted sex offender. The case has become emblematic of the larger questions surrounding Epstein’s network of elite associates, the power imbalance between wealthy defendants and accusers, and the ongoing struggle by survivors to seek accountability within a legal system critics argue often bends toward those with enormous resources and institutional influence.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Epstein-linked billionaire accused of rape privately reached out to federal judge to defend his ‘good name’ | Jeffrey Epstein | The Guardian

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75965797Mon, 26 Oct 2026 04:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciLeon Black has faced mounting scrutiny over his long and deeply intertwined relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, particularly after newly surfaced court filings revealed an aggressive behind-the-scenes legal effort tied to a woman accusing Black of rape...Leon Black has faced mounting scrutiny over his long and deeply intertwined relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, particularly after newly surfaced court filings revealed an aggressive behind-the-scenes legal effort tied to a woman accusing Black of rape connected to Epstein’s network. According to the reporting, Black’s legal team privately contacted federal Judge Jed Rakoff in an effort to challenge and ultimately reverse a multimillion-dollar compensation award granted to the accuser through an Epstein victims’ settlement fund. The woman, identified as Jane Doe, alleged that Black sexually assaulted her as a teenager at Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse. The Guardian’s reporting detailed how Black’s attorneys argued the settlement process had been manipulated by fraudulent evidence and sought to protect Black’s reputation from what they characterized as false allegations. Critics, however, argued the case highlighted how wealthy and powerful figures connected to Epstein continue to wield enormous legal and financial influence long after Epstein’s death.

The legal battle became even more controversial after a federal judge sanctioned Jane Doe and her former attorney for falsified evidence tied to parts of the case, though the court still allowed portions of the civil rape lawsuit against Black to proceed. Black has vehemently denied ever meeting or assaulting the accuser and has refused settlement offers, framing the allegations as entirely fabricated. Still, the broader controversy surrounding Black has persisted because of the extraordinary extent of his documented relationship with Epstein, including revelations that Black paid Epstein roughly $170 million for financial and tax-related services over several years despite Epstein already being a convicted sex offender. The case has become emblematic of the larger questions surrounding Epstein’s network of elite associates, the power imbalance between wealthy defendants and accusers, and the ongoing struggle by survivors to seek accountability within a legal system critics argue often bends toward those with enormous resources and institutional influence.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Epstein-linked billionaire accused of rape privately reached out to federal judge to defend his ‘good name’ | Jeffrey Epstein | The Guardian

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1821epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/leon-black-s-team-quietly-pressured-federal-judge-in-epstein-survivor-case-part-1--75965796Leon Black has faced mounting scrutiny over his long and deeply intertwined relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, particularly after newly surfaced court filings revealed an aggressive behind-the-scenes legal effort tied to a woman accusing Black of rape connected to Epstein’s network. According to the reporting, Black’s legal team privately contacted federal Judge Jed Rakoff in an effort to challenge and ultimately reverse a multimillion-dollar compensation award granted to the accuser through an Epstein victims’ settlement fund. The woman, identified as Jane Doe, alleged that Black sexually assaulted her as a teenager at Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse. The Guardian’s reporting detailed how Black’s attorneys argued the settlement process had been manipulated by fraudulent evidence and sought to protect Black’s reputation from what they characterized as false allegations. Critics, however, argued the case highlighted how wealthy and powerful figures connected to Epstein continue to wield enormous legal and financial influence long after Epstein’s death.

The legal battle became even more controversial after a federal judge sanctioned Jane Doe and her former attorney for falsified evidence tied to parts of the case, though the court still allowed portions of the civil rape lawsuit against Black to proceed. Black has vehemently denied ever meeting or assaulting the accuser and has refused settlement offers, framing the allegations as entirely fabricated. Still, the broader controversy surrounding Black has persisted because of the extraordinary extent of his documented relationship with Epstein, including revelations that Black paid Epstein roughly $170 million for financial and tax-related services over several years despite Epstein already being a convicted sex offender. The case has become emblematic of the larger questions surrounding Epstein’s network of elite associates, the power imbalance between wealthy defendants and accusers, and the ongoing struggle by survivors to seek accountability within a legal system critics argue often bends toward those with enormous resources and institutional influence.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Epstein-linked billionaire accused of rape privately reached out to federal judge to defend his ‘good name’ | Jeffrey Epstein | The Guardian

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75965796Mon, 26 Oct 2026 02:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciLeon Black has faced mounting scrutiny over his long and deeply intertwined relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, particularly after newly surfaced court filings revealed an aggressive behind-the-scenes legal effort tied to a woman accusing Black of rape...Leon Black has faced mounting scrutiny over his long and deeply intertwined relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, particularly after newly surfaced court filings revealed an aggressive behind-the-scenes legal effort tied to a woman accusing Black of rape connected to Epstein’s network. According to the reporting, Black’s legal team privately contacted federal Judge Jed Rakoff in an effort to challenge and ultimately reverse a multimillion-dollar compensation award granted to the accuser through an Epstein victims’ settlement fund. The woman, identified as Jane Doe, alleged that Black sexually assaulted her as a teenager at Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse. The Guardian’s reporting detailed how Black’s attorneys argued the settlement process had been manipulated by fraudulent evidence and sought to protect Black’s reputation from what they characterized as false allegations. Critics, however, argued the case highlighted how wealthy and powerful figures connected to Epstein continue to wield enormous legal and financial influence long after Epstein’s death.

The legal battle became even more controversial after a federal judge sanctioned Jane Doe and her former attorney for falsified evidence tied to parts of the case, though the court still allowed portions of the civil rape lawsuit against Black to proceed. Black has vehemently denied ever meeting or assaulting the accuser and has refused settlement offers, framing the allegations as entirely fabricated. Still, the broader controversy surrounding Black has persisted because of the extraordinary extent of his documented relationship with Epstein, including revelations that Black paid Epstein roughly $170 million for financial and tax-related services over several years despite Epstein already being a convicted sex offender. The case has become emblematic of the larger questions surrounding Epstein’s network of elite associates, the power imbalance between wealthy defendants and accusers, and the ongoing struggle by survivors to seek accountability within a legal system critics argue often bends toward those with enormous resources and institutional influence.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Epstein-linked billionaire accused of rape privately reached out to federal judge to defend his ‘good name’ | Jeffrey Epstein | The Guardian

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>962epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcript-day-5-part-7-10-25-26--75976354
The final day also became consumed by a dispute over courtroom cameras after Robinson’s alleged handwritten confession note had accidentally appeared on the public livestream for several seconds the previous day despite Judge Tony Graf ordering that it not be broadcast. Robinson’s attorneys argued that repeated violations threatened his ability to receive a fair trial and asked Graf to reconsider allowing cameras in the courtroom. Graf responded by prohibiting additional exhibits from being displayed publicly for the remainder of the hearing, although he later allowed an enhanced surveillance compilation from Utah Valley University to be shown inside the courtroom to Charlie Kirk’s family. That video allegedly tracked Robinson’s movements around campus, including a figure prosecutors identified as Robinson reaching the roof, moving into what the state described as a sniper position and then fleeing toward the wooded area after the shooting. Robinson declined to testify on the advice of his attorneys, the defense rested, and prosecutors presented no rebuttal evidence. Instead of immediately arguing whether Robinson should be bound over for trial, both sides were given time to file written briefs, with oral arguments scheduled for September 1 before Graf decided whether prosecutors had established probable cause for the case to proceed.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75976354Mon, 26 Oct 2026 00:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay five of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing focused heavily on the defense effort to weaken the prosecution’s DNA evidence. The defense called ATF DNA Section Chief Caitlin Oliver, who had performed testing on evidence including the rifle...
The final day also became consumed by a dispute over courtroom cameras after Robinson’s alleged handwritten confession note had accidentally appeared on the public livestream for several seconds the previous day despite Judge Tony Graf ordering that it not be broadcast. Robinson’s attorneys argued that repeated violations threatened his ability to receive a fair trial and asked Graf to reconsider allowing cameras in the courtroom. Graf responded by prohibiting additional exhibits from being displayed publicly for the remainder of the hearing, although he later allowed an enhanced surveillance compilation from Utah Valley University to be shown inside the courtroom to Charlie Kirk’s family. That video allegedly tracked Robinson’s movements around campus, including a figure prosecutors identified as Robinson reaching the roof, moving into what the state described as a sniper position and then fleeing toward the wooded area after the shooting. Robinson declined to testify on the advice of his attorneys, the defense rested, and prosecutors presented no rebuttal evidence. Instead of immediately arguing whether Robinson should be bound over for trial, both sides were given time to file written briefs, with oral arguments scheduled for September 1 before Graf decided whether prosecutors had established probable cause for the case to proceed.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>982breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcript-day-5-part-6-10-25-26--75967901
The final day also became consumed by a dispute over courtroom cameras after Robinson’s alleged handwritten confession note had accidentally appeared on the public livestream for several seconds the previous day despite Judge Tony Graf ordering that it not be broadcast. Robinson’s attorneys argued that repeated violations threatened his ability to receive a fair trial and asked Graf to reconsider allowing cameras in the courtroom. Graf responded by prohibiting additional exhibits from being displayed publicly for the remainder of the hearing, although he later allowed an enhanced surveillance compilation from Utah Valley University to be shown inside the courtroom to Charlie Kirk’s family. That video allegedly tracked Robinson’s movements around campus, including a figure prosecutors identified as Robinson reaching the roof, moving into what the state described as a sniper position and then fleeing toward the wooded area after the shooting. Robinson declined to testify on the advice of his attorneys, the defense rested, and prosecutors presented no rebuttal evidence. Instead of immediately arguing whether Robinson should be bound over for trial, both sides were given time to file written briefs, with oral arguments scheduled for September 1 before Graf decided whether prosecutors had established probable cause for the case to proceed.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75967901Sun, 25 Oct 2026 22:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciDay five of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing focused heavily on the defense effort to weaken the prosecution’s DNA evidence. The defense called ATF DNA Section Chief Caitlin Oliver, who had performed testing on evidence including the rifle...
The final day also became consumed by a dispute over courtroom cameras after Robinson’s alleged handwritten confession note had accidentally appeared on the public livestream for several seconds the previous day despite Judge Tony Graf ordering that it not be broadcast. Robinson’s attorneys argued that repeated violations threatened his ability to receive a fair trial and asked Graf to reconsider allowing cameras in the courtroom. Graf responded by prohibiting additional exhibits from being displayed publicly for the remainder of the hearing, although he later allowed an enhanced surveillance compilation from Utah Valley University to be shown inside the courtroom to Charlie Kirk’s family. That video allegedly tracked Robinson’s movements around campus, including a figure prosecutors identified as Robinson reaching the roof, moving into what the state described as a sniper position and then fleeing toward the wooded area after the shooting. Robinson declined to testify on the advice of his attorneys, the defense rested, and prosecutors presented no rebuttal evidence. Instead of immediately arguing whether Robinson should be bound over for trial, both sides were given time to file written briefs, with oral arguments scheduled for September 1 before Graf decided whether prosecutors had established probable cause for the case to proceed.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>688breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcript-day-5-part-5-10-25-26--75967903
The final day also became consumed by a dispute over courtroom cameras after Robinson’s alleged handwritten confession note had accidentally appeared on the public livestream for several seconds the previous day despite Judge Tony Graf ordering that it not be broadcast. Robinson’s attorneys argued that repeated violations threatened his ability to receive a fair trial and asked Graf to reconsider allowing cameras in the courtroom. Graf responded by prohibiting additional exhibits from being displayed publicly for the remainder of the hearing, although he later allowed an enhanced surveillance compilation from Utah Valley University to be shown inside the courtroom to Charlie Kirk’s family. That video allegedly tracked Robinson’s movements around campus, including a figure prosecutors identified as Robinson reaching the roof, moving into what the state described as a sniper position and then fleeing toward the wooded area after the shooting. Robinson declined to testify on the advice of his attorneys, the defense rested, and prosecutors presented no rebuttal evidence. Instead of immediately arguing whether Robinson should be bound over for trial, both sides were given time to file written briefs, with oral arguments scheduled for September 1 before Graf decided whether prosecutors had established probable cause for the case to proceed.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75967903Sun, 25 Oct 2026 20:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay five of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing focused heavily on the defense effort to weaken the prosecution’s DNA evidence. The defense called ATF DNA Section Chief Caitlin Oliver, who had performed testing on evidence including the rifle...
The final day also became consumed by a dispute over courtroom cameras after Robinson’s alleged handwritten confession note had accidentally appeared on the public livestream for several seconds the previous day despite Judge Tony Graf ordering that it not be broadcast. Robinson’s attorneys argued that repeated violations threatened his ability to receive a fair trial and asked Graf to reconsider allowing cameras in the courtroom. Graf responded by prohibiting additional exhibits from being displayed publicly for the remainder of the hearing, although he later allowed an enhanced surveillance compilation from Utah Valley University to be shown inside the courtroom to Charlie Kirk’s family. That video allegedly tracked Robinson’s movements around campus, including a figure prosecutors identified as Robinson reaching the roof, moving into what the state described as a sniper position and then fleeing toward the wooded area after the shooting. Robinson declined to testify on the advice of his attorneys, the defense rested, and prosecutors presented no rebuttal evidence. Instead of immediately arguing whether Robinson should be bound over for trial, both sides were given time to file written briefs, with oral arguments scheduled for September 1 before Graf decided whether prosecutors had established probable cause for the case to proceed.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>667breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcript-day-5-part-4-10-25-26--75967902
The final day also became consumed by a dispute over courtroom cameras after Robinson’s alleged handwritten confession note had accidentally appeared on the public livestream for several seconds the previous day despite Judge Tony Graf ordering that it not be broadcast. Robinson’s attorneys argued that repeated violations threatened his ability to receive a fair trial and asked Graf to reconsider allowing cameras in the courtroom. Graf responded by prohibiting additional exhibits from being displayed publicly for the remainder of the hearing, although he later allowed an enhanced surveillance compilation from Utah Valley University to be shown inside the courtroom to Charlie Kirk’s family. That video allegedly tracked Robinson’s movements around campus, including a figure prosecutors identified as Robinson reaching the roof, moving into what the state described as a sniper position and then fleeing toward the wooded area after the shooting. Robinson declined to testify on the advice of his attorneys, the defense rested, and prosecutors presented no rebuttal evidence. Instead of immediately arguing whether Robinson should be bound over for trial, both sides were given time to file written briefs, with oral arguments scheduled for September 1 before Graf decided whether prosecutors had established probable cause for the case to proceed.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75967902Sun, 25 Oct 2026 18:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay five of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing focused heavily on the defense effort to weaken the prosecution’s DNA evidence. The defense called ATF DNA Section Chief Caitlin Oliver, who had performed testing on evidence including the rifle...
The final day also became consumed by a dispute over courtroom cameras after Robinson’s alleged handwritten confession note had accidentally appeared on the public livestream for several seconds the previous day despite Judge Tony Graf ordering that it not be broadcast. Robinson’s attorneys argued that repeated violations threatened his ability to receive a fair trial and asked Graf to reconsider allowing cameras in the courtroom. Graf responded by prohibiting additional exhibits from being displayed publicly for the remainder of the hearing, although he later allowed an enhanced surveillance compilation from Utah Valley University to be shown inside the courtroom to Charlie Kirk’s family. That video allegedly tracked Robinson’s movements around campus, including a figure prosecutors identified as Robinson reaching the roof, moving into what the state described as a sniper position and then fleeing toward the wooded area after the shooting. Robinson declined to testify on the advice of his attorneys, the defense rested, and prosecutors presented no rebuttal evidence. Instead of immediately arguing whether Robinson should be bound over for trial, both sides were given time to file written briefs, with oral arguments scheduled for September 1 before Graf decided whether prosecutors had established probable cause for the case to proceed.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>790breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/late-2007-documents-show-continued-effort-to-shield-epstein-from-federal-exposure-part-5-10-25-26--75967904
Epstein’s attorneys also argued that the federal government had improperly transformed what they characterized as a state prostitution matter into a much broader federal sex-trafficking investigation. They challenged the use of federal statutes involving interstate communications, enticement and money laundering, accused prosecutors of pushing for harsher punishment than Florida authorities originally contemplated, and objected to provisions of the Non-Prosecution Agreement that protected victims’ ability to pursue civil claims. The defense also resisted efforts to notify victims, involve them in Epstein’s sentencing and facilitate representation for possible lawsuits. Their larger argument was that federal prosecutors had exceeded the proper boundaries of the case and were interpreting the Non-Prosecution Agreement more aggressively than Epstein’s lawyers believed had been agreed upon, while insisting that they were not asking Acosta to cancel the deal itself.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

EFTA00208923.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75967904Sun, 25 Oct 2026 16:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJeffrey Epstein’s lawyers mounted a broad attack on the federal investigation, arguing that prosecutors had built their case on unreliable witness accounts, distorted police reports and evidence that the defense said had been taken out of context....
Epstein’s attorneys also argued that the federal government had improperly transformed what they characterized as a state prostitution matter into a much broader federal sex-trafficking investigation. They challenged the use of federal statutes involving interstate communications, enticement and money laundering, accused prosecutors of pushing for harsher punishment than Florida authorities originally contemplated, and objected to provisions of the Non-Prosecution Agreement that protected victims’ ability to pursue civil claims. The defense also resisted efforts to notify victims, involve them in Epstein’s sentencing and facilitate representation for possible lawsuits. Their larger argument was that federal prosecutors had exceeded the proper boundaries of the case and were interpreting the Non-Prosecution Agreement more aggressively than Epstein’s lawyers believed had been agreed upon, while insisting that they were not asking Acosta to cancel the deal itself.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

EFTA00208923.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>800epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-chad-daybell-is-found-guilty-on-all-counts-10-25-26--75965649
The verdict represented a complete rejection of Chad’s effort to portray himself as someone who had been manipulated or set up by Lori and Alex. Jurors accepted the prosecution’s argument that Chad did not need to physically carry out every killing himself to be criminally responsible because he had participated in the conspiracies that led to the deaths. The guilty verdicts also meant the case immediately moved into a separate death-penalty phase, because prosecutors had sought capital punishment for the murders. Chad declined to testify during the trial and later chose not to present mitigating evidence during sentencing. Two days after the guilty verdict, on June 1, the same jury unanimously determined that the aggravating circumstances justified death, and Judge Steven Boyce formally imposed death sentences on the murder and conspiracy counts. The verdict closed the guilt phase of a case that had begun with two missing children in 2019 and ultimately established Chad Daybell as legally responsible for the deaths of JJ, Tylee and Tammy.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75965649Sun, 25 Oct 2026 14:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciChad Daybell was found guilty on May 30, 2024, after an Ada County jury deliberated for roughly six hours following a seven-week trial. Jurors convicted him on every count submitted to them, including first-degree murder in the deaths of 16-year-old...
The verdict represented a complete rejection of Chad’s effort to portray himself as someone who had been manipulated or set up by Lori and Alex. Jurors accepted the prosecution’s argument that Chad did not need to physically carry out every killing himself to be criminally responsible because he had participated in the conspiracies that led to the deaths. The guilty verdicts also meant the case immediately moved into a separate death-penalty phase, because prosecutors had sought capital punishment for the murders. Chad declined to testify during the trial and later chose not to present mitigating evidence during sentencing. Two days after the guilty verdict, on June 1, the same jury unanimously determined that the aggravating circumstances justified death, and Judge Steven Boyce formally imposed death sentences on the murder and conspiracy counts. The verdict closed the guilt phase of a case that had begun with two missing children in 2019 and ultimately established Chad Daybell as legally responsible for the deaths of JJ, Tylee and Tammy.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3073chaddaybell,chaddaybelltrial,courtroomcoverage,daybellcase,daybellmurders,doomsdaycouple,doomsdayprophet,idahomurders,idahotruecrime,jjandtylee,justiceforjj,justicefortammy,justicefortylee,lorivallow,lorivallowdaybell,murdertrial,tammydaybell,truecrime,truecrimecommunity,truecrimepodcasttruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-chad-daybell-trial-part-31-10-25-26--75965638
Defense attorney John Prior countered that prosecutors had built a circumstantial case around suspicion while failing to prove Chad actually participated in any of the killings. He emphasized that Chad’s DNA had not been found on JJ or Tylee, that cellphone evidence placed Alex Cox—not Chad—at critical locations around the burial sites, and that defense pathologist Dr. Kathy Raven had disputed the state’s conclusion that Tammy’s death was a homicide. Prior argued that Lori and Alex were responsible for the children’s deaths and suggested Alex could have buried them on Chad’s property to implicate him, while accusing investigators of developing tunnel vision once they decided Chad was involved. Prosecutor Rob Wood and Blake answered those arguments in rebuttal, reminding jurors that conspirators did not have to physically commit every act themselves and arguing that investigators simply followed evidence that repeatedly led back to Chad’s home, his communications and his financial interests. After closings ended, five of the 17 remaining jurors were randomly selected as alternates, leaving 12 to decide the case. Deliberations began at approximately 4:31 p.m. on May 29, 2024, continued for roughly two hours and then recessed for the night before resuming the following morning.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75965638Sun, 25 Oct 2026 12:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciDay thirty-one of Chad Daybell’s trial was devoted to closing arguments, with prosecutors pulling together weeks of testimony into a single theory built around what Fremont County Prosecutor Lindsey Blake called “money, power and sex.” Blake argued...
Defense attorney John Prior countered that prosecutors had built a circumstantial case around suspicion while failing to prove Chad actually participated in any of the killings. He emphasized that Chad’s DNA had not been found on JJ or Tylee, that cellphone evidence placed Alex Cox—not Chad—at critical locations around the burial sites, and that defense pathologist Dr. Kathy Raven had disputed the state’s conclusion that Tammy’s death was a homicide. Prior argued that Lori and Alex were responsible for the children’s deaths and suggested Alex could have buried them on Chad’s property to implicate him, while accusing investigators of developing tunnel vision once they decided Chad was involved. Prosecutor Rob Wood and Blake answered those arguments in rebuttal, reminding jurors that conspirators did not have to physically commit every act themselves and arguing that investigators simply followed evidence that repeatedly led back to Chad’s home, his communications and his financial interests. After closings ended, five of the 17 remaining jurors were randomly selected as alternates, leaving 12 to decide the case. Deliberations began at approximately 4:31 p.m. on May 29, 2024, continued for roughly two hours and then recessed for the night before resuming the following morning.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3086chaddaybell,chaddaybelltrial,courtroomcoverage,daybellcase,daybellmurders,doomsdaycouple,doomsdayprophet,idahomurders,idahotruecrime,jjandtylee,justiceforjj,justicefortammy,justicefortylee,lorivallow,lorivallowdaybell,murdertrial,tammydaybell,truecrime,truecrimecommunity,truecrimepodcasttruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-chad-daybell-part-29-30-10-25-26--75965639
Day thirty finished the evidentiary phase of the trial. Utah medical examiner Dr. Erik Christensen returned as a rebuttal witness and stood firmly by his conclusion that Tammy died from homicide by asphyxia, rejecting defense expert Dr. Kathy Raven’s suggestion that Tammy’s death should have been classified as undetermined. Christensen said Tammy’s organs were healthy, toxicology and seizure-related explanations did not account for her death, her medical records contained no diagnosis of sleep apnea, and nothing he reviewed changed his homicide determination. Retired Rexburg detective David Stubbs then introduced evidence showing that the Chad Daybell Google account had searched for instructions on disabling location services and that a request was made in August 2019 to delete the account’s entire Google location history, evidence prosecutors used to answer the defense argument that Chad’s lack of location data during key dates meant he was not on the property. Detective Ray Hermosillo briefly returned to rebut suggestions that his presence around the Daybell property and Emma Murray had been improper. After the state rested its rebuttal case, Judge Boyce dismissed the jury for the day and spent the afternoon finalizing exhibits and 41 jury instructions. The evidentiary portion of the trial was officially over, leaving only closing arguments before the case went to the jury.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75965639Sun, 25 Oct 2026 10:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay twenty-nine brought Chad Daybell’s defense case to an end and immediately opened the prosecution’s rebuttal. Forensic anthropologist Dr. Eric Bartelink was the final defense witness, testifying about the badly burned and incomplete remains of...
Day thirty finished the evidentiary phase of the trial. Utah medical examiner Dr. Erik Christensen returned as a rebuttal witness and stood firmly by his conclusion that Tammy died from homicide by asphyxia, rejecting defense expert Dr. Kathy Raven’s suggestion that Tammy’s death should have been classified as undetermined. Christensen said Tammy’s organs were healthy, toxicology and seizure-related explanations did not account for her death, her medical records contained no diagnosis of sleep apnea, and nothing he reviewed changed his homicide determination. Retired Rexburg detective David Stubbs then introduced evidence showing that the Chad Daybell Google account had searched for instructions on disabling location services and that a request was made in August 2019 to delete the account’s entire Google location history, evidence prosecutors used to answer the defense argument that Chad’s lack of location data during key dates meant he was not on the property. Detective Ray Hermosillo briefly returned to rebut suggestions that his presence around the Daybell property and Emma Murray had been improper. After the state rested its rebuttal case, Judge Boyce dismissed the jury for the day and spent the afternoon finalizing exhibits and 41 jury instructions. The evidentiary portion of the trial was officially over, leaving only closing arguments before the case went to the jury.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2678chaddaybell,chaddaybelltrial,courtroomcoverage,daybellcase,daybellmurders,doomsdaycouple,doomsdayprophet,idahomurders,idahotruecrime,jjandtylee,justiceforjj,justicefortammy,justicefortylee,lorivallow,lorivallowdaybell,murdertrial,tammydaybell,truecrime,truecrimecommunity,truecrimepodcasttruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-chad-daybell-trial-part-27-28-10-25-26--75965636
Day twenty-eight turned almost entirely to the prosecution’s electronic and forensic evidence, with the defense calling data-forensics expert Patrick Eller and DNA expert Dr. Greg Hampikian. Eller testified that although Alex Cox’s cellphone was detected on Chad’s property during critical periods on September 9 and September 23, 2019—the dates associated with the burials of Tylee and JJ—he found no electronic location data placing Chad’s devices on the property at the same time. Prosecutors countered that Chad used multiple phones and that the absence of geolocation data did not establish that Chad himself was absent, since location tracking could be disabled or a phone could simply be turned off. Hampikian then testified that his review of the DNA testing found no Chad Daybell DNA on the tested evidence associated with the children and that four hairs he reviewed did not match Chad, Lori or JJ. He nevertheless acknowledged that Tylee’s DNA had been found on the shovel and pickaxe recovered from Chad’s property and that the laboratories had not improperly conducted their testing. By the end of the day, defense attorney John Prior said he was prepared to rest, while prosecutors began preparing rebuttal witnesses to answer the defense claims about Tammy’s health, the investigation and the physical evidence.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75965636Sun, 25 Oct 2026 08:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay twenty-seven of Chad Daybell’s trial continued the defense effort to challenge both the prosecution’s theory of Tammy Daybell’s death and the investigation itself. Chad’s son-in-law Joseph Murray returned to the stand and was questioned about...
Day twenty-eight turned almost entirely to the prosecution’s electronic and forensic evidence, with the defense calling data-forensics expert Patrick Eller and DNA expert Dr. Greg Hampikian. Eller testified that although Alex Cox’s cellphone was detected on Chad’s property during critical periods on September 9 and September 23, 2019—the dates associated with the burials of Tylee and JJ—he found no electronic location data placing Chad’s devices on the property at the same time. Prosecutors countered that Chad used multiple phones and that the absence of geolocation data did not establish that Chad himself was absent, since location tracking could be disabled or a phone could simply be turned off. Hampikian then testified that his review of the DNA testing found no Chad Daybell DNA on the tested evidence associated with the children and that four hairs he reviewed did not match Chad, Lori or JJ. He nevertheless acknowledged that Tylee’s DNA had been found on the shovel and pickaxe recovered from Chad’s property and that the laboratories had not improperly conducted their testing. By the end of the day, defense attorney John Prior said he was prepared to rest, while prosecutors began preparing rebuttal witnesses to answer the defense claims about Tammy’s health, the investigation and the physical evidence.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3012chaddaybell,chaddaybelltrial,courtroomcoverage,daybellcase,daybellmurders,doomsdaycouple,doomsdayprophet,idahomurders,idahotruecrime,jjandtylee,justiceforjj,justicefortammy,justicefortylee,lorivallow,lorivallowdaybell,murdertrial,tammydaybell,truecrime,truecrimecommunity,truecrimepodcasttruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-chad-daybell-trial-part-26-10-24-26--75965637
Chad’s son Garth Daybell then testified that Tammy had become easily exhausted before her death and had experienced what he described as fainting spells. He said that on the night she died, he returned home around 1 a.m., saw what appeared to be both of his parents lying in bed as he passed their room and later awoke after hearing a thump and Chad calling for help. Garth said he found Tammy partially out of bed, cold, stiff and gray, and insisted he had heard no struggle during the night. He also accused investigators and prosecutors of pressuring him to change his account, saying he had been questioned for hours and later summoned before a second grand jury where he believed he was being threatened with possible perjury charges; he was never charged. Emma’s husband, Joseph Murray, finished the day by testifying that Tammy appeared exhausted and was coughing heavily on the evening before her death, while also discussing raccoon problems around the property and access routes near the areas where JJ and Tylee were later found. Day twenty-six therefore revealed the defense strategy clearly: portray Tammy as legitimately ill, Chad as a grieving husband and law enforcement as overly aggressive, while prosecutors used the family’s own testimony to highlight contradictions, missing medical documentation and Chad’s behavior once the children’s bodies were discovered.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75965637Sun, 25 Oct 2026 06:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciDay twenty-six of Chad Daybell’s trial marked the beginning of the defense case, with Daybell’s children taking the stand to challenge the prosecution’s portrayal of Tammy Daybell as healthy before her death. Emma Murray testified that Tammy had been...
Chad’s son Garth Daybell then testified that Tammy had become easily exhausted before her death and had experienced what he described as fainting spells. He said that on the night she died, he returned home around 1 a.m., saw what appeared to be both of his parents lying in bed as he passed their room and later awoke after hearing a thump and Chad calling for help. Garth said he found Tammy partially out of bed, cold, stiff and gray, and insisted he had heard no struggle during the night. He also accused investigators and prosecutors of pressuring him to change his account, saying he had been questioned for hours and later summoned before a second grand jury where he believed he was being threatened with possible perjury charges; he was never charged. Emma’s husband, Joseph Murray, finished the day by testifying that Tammy appeared exhausted and was coughing heavily on the evening before her death, while also discussing raccoon problems around the property and access routes near the areas where JJ and Tylee were later found. Day twenty-six therefore revealed the defense strategy clearly: portray Tammy as legitimately ill, Chad as a grieving husband and law enforcement as overly aggressive, while prosecutors used the family’s own testimony to highlight contradictions, missing medical documentation and Chad’s behavior once the children’s bodies were discovered.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3334chaddaybell,chaddaybelltrial,courtroomcoverage,daybellcase,daybellmurders,doomsdaycouple,doomsdayprophet,idahomurders,idahotruecrime,jjandtylee,justiceforjj,justicefortammy,justicefortylee,lorivallow,lorivallowdaybell,murdertrial,tammydaybell,truecrime,truecrimecommunity,truecrimepodcasttruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/leon-black-s-epstein-fallout-stopped-at-the-museum-door-part-2--75965816
The story was also an indictment of an art world that has repeatedly demonstrated an extraordinary capacity to overlook almost anything when enormous wealth, prestigious collections, and major donations are involved. Black did not merely purchase paintings; his money bought him extraordinary institutional standing, culminating in his chairmanship of the Museum of Modern Art, while his masterpieces circulated through museums that benefited from his patronage and prestige. Even after the Epstein relationship became impossible to ignore, Black remained on MoMA’s board and continued appearing at major art fairs, museum dinners, galleries, sporting events, and elite cultural gatherings. That resilience illustrated one of the uglier realities of the contemporary art ecosystem: museums and cultural institutions frequently present themselves as moral authorities while remaining financially dependent upon billionaires whose money grants them astonishing insulation from ordinary reputational consequences. Black eventually surrendered leadership positions at Apollo and MoMA, but he was hardly exiled from the cultural establishment. The art world absorbed the scandal, issued the requisite expressions of concern, and largely moved forward with one of its most valuable collectors still inside the tent. In that sense, the Black-Epstein story was about much more than one billionaire’s extraordinarily questionable judgment. It demonstrated how an industry built around opaque ownership, private transactions, tax strategy, asset-backed borrowing, billionaire philanthropy, and social exclusivity could provide the perfect environment for uncomfortable questions to remain unanswered as long as the person writing the checks remained important enough.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

The Strange Tale of Leon Black and Jeffrey Epstein | Vanity Fair

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75965816Sun, 25 Oct 2026 04:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciLeon Black’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein exposed just how deeply the worlds of high finance, elite philanthropy, and blue-chip art could overlap without much meaningful scrutiny. Black, the billionaire cofounder of Apollo Global Management and...
The story was also an indictment of an art world that has repeatedly demonstrated an extraordinary capacity to overlook almost anything when enormous wealth, prestigious collections, and major donations are involved. Black did not merely purchase paintings; his money bought him extraordinary institutional standing, culminating in his chairmanship of the Museum of Modern Art, while his masterpieces circulated through museums that benefited from his patronage and prestige. Even after the Epstein relationship became impossible to ignore, Black remained on MoMA’s board and continued appearing at major art fairs, museum dinners, galleries, sporting events, and elite cultural gatherings. That resilience illustrated one of the uglier realities of the contemporary art ecosystem: museums and cultural institutions frequently present themselves as moral authorities while remaining financially dependent upon billionaires whose money grants them astonishing insulation from ordinary reputational consequences. Black eventually surrendered leadership positions at Apollo and MoMA, but he was hardly exiled from the cultural establishment. The art world absorbed the scandal, issued the requisite expressions of concern, and largely moved forward with one of its most valuable collectors still inside the tent. In that sense, the Black-Epstein story was about much more than one billionaire’s extraordinarily questionable judgment. It demonstrated how an industry built around opaque ownership, private transactions, tax strategy, asset-backed borrowing, billionaire philanthropy, and social exclusivity could provide the perfect environment for uncomfortable questions to remain unanswered as long as the person writing the checks remained important enough.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

The Strange Tale of Leon Black and Jeffrey Epstein | Vanity Fair

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>944epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/leon-black-s-epstein-fallout-stopped-at-the-museum-door-part-1--75965817
The story was also an indictment of an art world that has repeatedly demonstrated an extraordinary capacity to overlook almost anything when enormous wealth, prestigious collections, and major donations are involved. Black did not merely purchase paintings; his money bought him extraordinary institutional standing, culminating in his chairmanship of the Museum of Modern Art, while his masterpieces circulated through museums that benefited from his patronage and prestige. Even after the Epstein relationship became impossible to ignore, Black remained on MoMA’s board and continued appearing at major art fairs, museum dinners, galleries, sporting events, and elite cultural gatherings. That resilience illustrated one of the uglier realities of the contemporary art ecosystem: museums and cultural institutions frequently present themselves as moral authorities while remaining financially dependent upon billionaires whose money grants them astonishing insulation from ordinary reputational consequences. Black eventually surrendered leadership positions at Apollo and MoMA, but he was hardly exiled from the cultural establishment. The art world absorbed the scandal, issued the requisite expressions of concern, and largely moved forward with one of its most valuable collectors still inside the tent. In that sense, the Black-Epstein story was about much more than one billionaire’s extraordinarily questionable judgment. It demonstrated how an industry built around opaque ownership, private transactions, tax strategy, asset-backed borrowing, billionaire philanthropy, and social exclusivity could provide the perfect environment for uncomfortable questions to remain unanswered as long as the person writing the checks remained important enough.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

The Strange Tale of Leon Black and Jeffrey Epstein | Vanity Fair

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75965817Sun, 25 Oct 2026 02:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciLeon Black’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein exposed just how deeply the worlds of high finance, elite philanthropy, and blue-chip art could overlap without much meaningful scrutiny. Black, the billionaire cofounder of Apollo Global Management and...
The story was also an indictment of an art world that has repeatedly demonstrated an extraordinary capacity to overlook almost anything when enormous wealth, prestigious collections, and major donations are involved. Black did not merely purchase paintings; his money bought him extraordinary institutional standing, culminating in his chairmanship of the Museum of Modern Art, while his masterpieces circulated through museums that benefited from his patronage and prestige. Even after the Epstein relationship became impossible to ignore, Black remained on MoMA’s board and continued appearing at major art fairs, museum dinners, galleries, sporting events, and elite cultural gatherings. That resilience illustrated one of the uglier realities of the contemporary art ecosystem: museums and cultural institutions frequently present themselves as moral authorities while remaining financially dependent upon billionaires whose money grants them astonishing insulation from ordinary reputational consequences. Black eventually surrendered leadership positions at Apollo and MoMA, but he was hardly exiled from the cultural establishment. The art world absorbed the scandal, issued the requisite expressions of concern, and largely moved forward with one of its most valuable collectors still inside the tent. In that sense, the Black-Epstein story was about much more than one billionaire’s extraordinarily questionable judgment. It demonstrated how an industry built around opaque ownership, private transactions, tax strategy, asset-backed borrowing, billionaire philanthropy, and social exclusivity could provide the perfect environment for uncomfortable questions to remain unanswered as long as the person writing the checks remained important enough.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

The Strange Tale of Leon Black and Jeffrey Epstein | Vanity Fair

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>859epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcript-day-5-part-3-10-24-26--75965461
The final day also became consumed by a dispute over courtroom cameras after Robinson’s alleged handwritten confession note had accidentally appeared on the public livestream for several seconds the previous day despite Judge Tony Graf ordering that it not be broadcast. Robinson’s attorneys argued that repeated violations threatened his ability to receive a fair trial and asked Graf to reconsider allowing cameras in the courtroom. Graf responded by prohibiting additional exhibits from being displayed publicly for the remainder of the hearing, although he later allowed an enhanced surveillance compilation from Utah Valley University to be shown inside the courtroom to Charlie Kirk’s family. That video allegedly tracked Robinson’s movements around campus, including a figure prosecutors identified as Robinson reaching the roof, moving into what the state described as a sniper position and then fleeing toward the wooded area after the shooting. Robinson declined to testify on the advice of his attorneys, the defense rested, and prosecutors presented no rebuttal evidence. Instead of immediately arguing whether Robinson should be bound over for trial, both sides were given time to file written briefs, with oral arguments scheduled for September 1 before Graf decided whether prosecutors had established probable cause for the case to proceed.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75965461Sun, 25 Oct 2026 00:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciDay five of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing focused heavily on the defense effort to weaken the prosecution’s DNA evidence. The defense called ATF DNA Section Chief Caitlin Oliver, who had performed testing on evidence including the rifle...
The final day also became consumed by a dispute over courtroom cameras after Robinson’s alleged handwritten confession note had accidentally appeared on the public livestream for several seconds the previous day despite Judge Tony Graf ordering that it not be broadcast. Robinson’s attorneys argued that repeated violations threatened his ability to receive a fair trial and asked Graf to reconsider allowing cameras in the courtroom. Graf responded by prohibiting additional exhibits from being displayed publicly for the remainder of the hearing, although he later allowed an enhanced surveillance compilation from Utah Valley University to be shown inside the courtroom to Charlie Kirk’s family. That video allegedly tracked Robinson’s movements around campus, including a figure prosecutors identified as Robinson reaching the roof, moving into what the state described as a sniper position and then fleeing toward the wooded area after the shooting. Robinson declined to testify on the advice of his attorneys, the defense rested, and prosecutors presented no rebuttal evidence. Instead of immediately arguing whether Robinson should be bound over for trial, both sides were given time to file written briefs, with oral arguments scheduled for September 1 before Graf decided whether prosecutors had established probable cause for the case to proceed.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>665breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/new-mexico-s-lawsuit-filed-against-epstein-executors-darren-indyke-and-richard-kahn-part-7-10-24-26--75950881
The lawsuit went considerably further than simply seeking damages from Epstein’s estate. New Mexico brought claims under the federal Trafficking Victims Protection Act and the New Mexico Racketeering Act, accusing Indyke and Kahn of participating in racketeering predicates involving kidnapping, criminal solicitation and conspiracy, while also seeking restitution for unjust enrichment. The complaint cited multiple Jane Does who allegedly were transported to Zorro Ranch through deception, intimidation or coercion and sexually abused there, and it alleged that Indyke and Kahn helped finance the system that recruited and maintained access to those victims. The financial stakes were enormous because both men now serve as co-executors of Epstein’s estate and trustees and beneficiaries of the 1953 Trust; the complaint said Indyke could receive up to $50 million and Kahn up to $25 million from an estate still valued at more than $107 million. New Mexico asked the court to block estate distributions while the case proceeds, force the defendants to disgorge allegedly ill-gotten gains, award restitution, compensatory and punitive damages, potentially triple racketeering damages, and direct assets toward people harmed by the alleged enterprise. These remain civil allegations that Indyke and Kahn will have the opportunity to contest, but the filing represents one of the most aggressive attempts yet to hold Epstein’s financial inner circle legally responsible for allegedly enabling the machinery around his trafficking operation.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


gov.uscourts.nmd.576774.1.0_1.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75950881Sat, 24 Oct 2026 22:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciNew Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez accused Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn of being active financial and administrative participants in what the complaint called the “Epstein Enterprise,” rather than merely Jeffrey Epstein’s lawyer and accountant....
The lawsuit went considerably further than simply seeking damages from Epstein’s estate. New Mexico brought claims under the federal Trafficking Victims Protection Act and the New Mexico Racketeering Act, accusing Indyke and Kahn of participating in racketeering predicates involving kidnapping, criminal solicitation and conspiracy, while also seeking restitution for unjust enrichment. The complaint cited multiple Jane Does who allegedly were transported to Zorro Ranch through deception, intimidation or coercion and sexually abused there, and it alleged that Indyke and Kahn helped finance the system that recruited and maintained access to those victims. The financial stakes were enormous because both men now serve as co-executors of Epstein’s estate and trustees and beneficiaries of the 1953 Trust; the complaint said Indyke could receive up to $50 million and Kahn up to $25 million from an estate still valued at more than $107 million. New Mexico asked the court to block estate distributions while the case proceeds, force the defendants to disgorge allegedly ill-gotten gains, award restitution, compensatory and punitive damages, potentially triple racketeering damages, and direct assets toward people harmed by the alleged enterprise. These remain civil allegations that Indyke and Kahn will have the opportunity to contest, but the filing represents one of the most aggressive attempts yet to hold Epstein’s financial inner circle legally responsible for allegedly enabling the machinery around his trafficking operation.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


gov.uscourts.nmd.576774.1.0_1.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>713epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/new-mexico-s-lawsuit-filed-against-epstein-executors-darren-indyke-and-richard-kahn-part-6-10-24-26--75950882
The lawsuit went considerably further than simply seeking damages from Epstein’s estate. New Mexico brought claims under the federal Trafficking Victims Protection Act and the New Mexico Racketeering Act, accusing Indyke and Kahn of participating in racketeering predicates involving kidnapping, criminal solicitation and conspiracy, while also seeking restitution for unjust enrichment. The complaint cited multiple Jane Does who allegedly were transported to Zorro Ranch through deception, intimidation or coercion and sexually abused there, and it alleged that Indyke and Kahn helped finance the system that recruited and maintained access to those victims. The financial stakes were enormous because both men now serve as co-executors of Epstein’s estate and trustees and beneficiaries of the 1953 Trust; the complaint said Indyke could receive up to $50 million and Kahn up to $25 million from an estate still valued at more than $107 million. New Mexico asked the court to block estate distributions while the case proceeds, force the defendants to disgorge allegedly ill-gotten gains, award restitution, compensatory and punitive damages, potentially triple racketeering damages, and direct assets toward people harmed by the alleged enterprise. These remain civil allegations that Indyke and Kahn will have the opportunity to contest, but the filing represents one of the most aggressive attempts yet to hold Epstein’s financial inner circle legally responsible for allegedly enabling the machinery around his trafficking operation.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


gov.uscourts.nmd.576774.1.0_1.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75950882Sat, 24 Oct 2026 20:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciNew Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez accused Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn of being active financial and administrative participants in what the complaint called the “Epstein Enterprise,” rather than merely Jeffrey Epstein’s lawyer and accountant....
The lawsuit went considerably further than simply seeking damages from Epstein’s estate. New Mexico brought claims under the federal Trafficking Victims Protection Act and the New Mexico Racketeering Act, accusing Indyke and Kahn of participating in racketeering predicates involving kidnapping, criminal solicitation and conspiracy, while also seeking restitution for unjust enrichment. The complaint cited multiple Jane Does who allegedly were transported to Zorro Ranch through deception, intimidation or coercion and sexually abused there, and it alleged that Indyke and Kahn helped finance the system that recruited and maintained access to those victims. The financial stakes were enormous because both men now serve as co-executors of Epstein’s estate and trustees and beneficiaries of the 1953 Trust; the complaint said Indyke could receive up to $50 million and Kahn up to $25 million from an estate still valued at more than $107 million. New Mexico asked the court to block estate distributions while the case proceeds, force the defendants to disgorge allegedly ill-gotten gains, award restitution, compensatory and punitive damages, potentially triple racketeering damages, and direct assets toward people harmed by the alleged enterprise. These remain civil allegations that Indyke and Kahn will have the opportunity to contest, but the filing represents one of the most aggressive attempts yet to hold Epstein’s financial inner circle legally responsible for allegedly enabling the machinery around his trafficking operation.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


gov.uscourts.nmd.576774.1.0_1.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>647epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/new-mexico-s-lawsuit-filed-against-epstein-executors-darren-indyke-and-richard-kahn-part-5-10-24-26--75950884
The lawsuit went considerably further than simply seeking damages from Epstein’s estate. New Mexico brought claims under the federal Trafficking Victims Protection Act and the New Mexico Racketeering Act, accusing Indyke and Kahn of participating in racketeering predicates involving kidnapping, criminal solicitation and conspiracy, while also seeking restitution for unjust enrichment. The complaint cited multiple Jane Does who allegedly were transported to Zorro Ranch through deception, intimidation or coercion and sexually abused there, and it alleged that Indyke and Kahn helped finance the system that recruited and maintained access to those victims. The financial stakes were enormous because both men now serve as co-executors of Epstein’s estate and trustees and beneficiaries of the 1953 Trust; the complaint said Indyke could receive up to $50 million and Kahn up to $25 million from an estate still valued at more than $107 million. New Mexico asked the court to block estate distributions while the case proceeds, force the defendants to disgorge allegedly ill-gotten gains, award restitution, compensatory and punitive damages, potentially triple racketeering damages, and direct assets toward people harmed by the alleged enterprise. These remain civil allegations that Indyke and Kahn will have the opportunity to contest, but the filing represents one of the most aggressive attempts yet to hold Epstein’s financial inner circle legally responsible for allegedly enabling the machinery around his trafficking operation.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


gov.uscourts.nmd.576774.1.0_1.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75950884Sat, 24 Oct 2026 18:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciNew Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez accused Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn of being active financial and administrative participants in what the complaint called the “Epstein Enterprise,” rather than merely Jeffrey Epstein’s lawyer and accountant....
The lawsuit went considerably further than simply seeking damages from Epstein’s estate. New Mexico brought claims under the federal Trafficking Victims Protection Act and the New Mexico Racketeering Act, accusing Indyke and Kahn of participating in racketeering predicates involving kidnapping, criminal solicitation and conspiracy, while also seeking restitution for unjust enrichment. The complaint cited multiple Jane Does who allegedly were transported to Zorro Ranch through deception, intimidation or coercion and sexually abused there, and it alleged that Indyke and Kahn helped finance the system that recruited and maintained access to those victims. The financial stakes were enormous because both men now serve as co-executors of Epstein’s estate and trustees and beneficiaries of the 1953 Trust; the complaint said Indyke could receive up to $50 million and Kahn up to $25 million from an estate still valued at more than $107 million. New Mexico asked the court to block estate distributions while the case proceeds, force the defendants to disgorge allegedly ill-gotten gains, award restitution, compensatory and punitive damages, potentially triple racketeering damages, and direct assets toward people harmed by the alleged enterprise. These remain civil allegations that Indyke and Kahn will have the opportunity to contest, but the filing represents one of the most aggressive attempts yet to hold Epstein’s financial inner circle legally responsible for allegedly enabling the machinery around his trafficking operation.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


gov.uscourts.nmd.576774.1.0_1.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>659epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/new-mexico-s-lawsuit-filed-against-epstein-executors-darren-indyke-and-richard-kahn-part-4-10-24-26--75950883
The lawsuit went considerably further than simply seeking damages from Epstein’s estate. New Mexico brought claims under the federal Trafficking Victims Protection Act and the New Mexico Racketeering Act, accusing Indyke and Kahn of participating in racketeering predicates involving kidnapping, criminal solicitation and conspiracy, while also seeking restitution for unjust enrichment. The complaint cited multiple Jane Does who allegedly were transported to Zorro Ranch through deception, intimidation or coercion and sexually abused there, and it alleged that Indyke and Kahn helped finance the system that recruited and maintained access to those victims. The financial stakes were enormous because both men now serve as co-executors of Epstein’s estate and trustees and beneficiaries of the 1953 Trust; the complaint said Indyke could receive up to $50 million and Kahn up to $25 million from an estate still valued at more than $107 million. New Mexico asked the court to block estate distributions while the case proceeds, force the defendants to disgorge allegedly ill-gotten gains, award restitution, compensatory and punitive damages, potentially triple racketeering damages, and direct assets toward people harmed by the alleged enterprise. These remain civil allegations that Indyke and Kahn will have the opportunity to contest, but the filing represents one of the most aggressive attempts yet to hold Epstein’s financial inner circle legally responsible for allegedly enabling the machinery around his trafficking operation.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


gov.uscourts.nmd.576774.1.0_1.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75950883Sat, 24 Oct 2026 16:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciNew Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez accused Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn of being active financial and administrative participants in what the complaint called the “Epstein Enterprise,” rather than merely Jeffrey Epstein’s lawyer and accountant....
The lawsuit went considerably further than simply seeking damages from Epstein’s estate. New Mexico brought claims under the federal Trafficking Victims Protection Act and the New Mexico Racketeering Act, accusing Indyke and Kahn of participating in racketeering predicates involving kidnapping, criminal solicitation and conspiracy, while also seeking restitution for unjust enrichment. The complaint cited multiple Jane Does who allegedly were transported to Zorro Ranch through deception, intimidation or coercion and sexually abused there, and it alleged that Indyke and Kahn helped finance the system that recruited and maintained access to those victims. The financial stakes were enormous because both men now serve as co-executors of Epstein’s estate and trustees and beneficiaries of the 1953 Trust; the complaint said Indyke could receive up to $50 million and Kahn up to $25 million from an estate still valued at more than $107 million. New Mexico asked the court to block estate distributions while the case proceeds, force the defendants to disgorge allegedly ill-gotten gains, award restitution, compensatory and punitive damages, potentially triple racketeering damages, and direct assets toward people harmed by the alleged enterprise. These remain civil allegations that Indyke and Kahn will have the opportunity to contest, but the filing represents one of the most aggressive attempts yet to hold Epstein’s financial inner circle legally responsible for allegedly enabling the machinery around his trafficking operation.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


gov.uscourts.nmd.576774.1.0_1.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>677epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-chad-daybell-trial-part-25-10-24-26--75940915
The biggest drama of Day 25 came after the prosecution rested, when defense attorney John Prior asked Judge Steven Boyce to acquit Daybell on the charges and a serious error surfaced in the amended indictment. Prior argued that prosecutors had failed to present sufficient evidence tying Chad directly to the murders or proving the alleged conspiracies, but Boyce rejected the acquittal requests after finding the state had presented enough evidence for the charges to go to the jury. The complication involved Count Four, the first-degree murder charge for JJ Vallow: the amended indictment mistakenly listed September 8–9, 2019—the timeframe associated with Tylee’s death—instead of the September 22–23 timeframe prosecutors alleged for JJ’s murder. Prior argued that prosecutors had already rested and should not be permitted to repair the charging document afterward, warning that doing so would create a significant due-process issue. Prosecutor Ingrid Batey characterized the incorrect dates as an inadvertent error and proposed several possible fixes, including correcting the indictment or addressing the mistake through jury instructions. Boyce ultimately refused to dismiss JJ’s murder charge, finding sufficient evidence had been presented and ruling that the incorrect dates resulted from an inadvertent mistake, although he reserved the precise method of correcting it for later. Day 25 therefore ended with the state’s evidence complete but with an unexpected indictment problem threatening to become a major issue as Daybell’s defense prepared to begin.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75940915Sat, 24 Oct 2026 14:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciDay 25 of Chad Daybell’s trial marked the end of the prosecution’s case, with retired FBI Special Agent Doug Hart serving as its final witness. Hart walked jurors through some of the most damaging communications between Chad and Lori Vallow, including...
The biggest drama of Day 25 came after the prosecution rested, when defense attorney John Prior asked Judge Steven Boyce to acquit Daybell on the charges and a serious error surfaced in the amended indictment. Prior argued that prosecutors had failed to present sufficient evidence tying Chad directly to the murders or proving the alleged conspiracies, but Boyce rejected the acquittal requests after finding the state had presented enough evidence for the charges to go to the jury. The complication involved Count Four, the first-degree murder charge for JJ Vallow: the amended indictment mistakenly listed September 8–9, 2019—the timeframe associated with Tylee’s death—instead of the September 22–23 timeframe prosecutors alleged for JJ’s murder. Prior argued that prosecutors had already rested and should not be permitted to repair the charging document afterward, warning that doing so would create a significant due-process issue. Prosecutor Ingrid Batey characterized the incorrect dates as an inadvertent error and proposed several possible fixes, including correcting the indictment or addressing the mistake through jury instructions. Boyce ultimately refused to dismiss JJ’s murder charge, finding sufficient evidence had been presented and ruling that the incorrect dates resulted from an inadvertent mistake, although he reserved the precise method of correcting it for later. Day 25 therefore ended with the state’s evidence complete but with an unexpected indictment problem threatening to become a major issue as Daybell’s defense prepared to begin.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2547alexcox,chaddaybell,chaddaybelltrial,courtroomcoverage,crimenews,daybellcase,daybelltrial,idahomurders,idahotruecrime,jjvalow,justiceforjjandtylee,lorivallow,lorivallowdaybell,murdertrial,tammydaybell,trialupdates,truecrime,truecrimecommunity,truecrimepodcast,tyleeryantruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-chad-daybell-trial-part-24-10-24-26--75940917
Idaho Attorney General investigator Nicholas Edwards then walked jurors through an extensive timeline of Chad and Lori’s relationship and the events surrounding Tammy Daybell’s death. Jurors saw messages in which Chad described feeling trapped with Tammy and predicted that “permanent freedom” was coming, later told Lori he was “trying to hasten her departure,” and participated in conversations portraying Tammy as having been replaced by a demonic entity named Viola. Edwards also detailed the October 9, 2019 incident when Tammy reported that a masked man pointed what she initially described as a rifle at her, while records showed extensive communication involving Chad and Alex that day and later internet searches from Alex’s device involving rifles, suppressors and the thickness of vehicle doors. Prosecutors also emphasized that Alex’s phone was near the Salem church, roughly 2.6 miles from the Daybell residence, late on October 18—the night before Tammy died—before going silent for more than an hour. The morning after Tammy’s death, Chad was already exchanging romantic messages with Lori, discussing her return to Idaho, their future together and financial matters, while he ultimately collected payouts from Tammy’s life-insurance policies. John Prior attacked Edwards’ timeline as selective, pointed to gaps in Alex’s cellphone data and stressed that none of the messages explicitly contained an agreement to murder Tammy, JJ or Tylee. By the end of Day 24, however, prosecutors had assembled their evidence into a chronological narrative arguing that Chad was not simply connected to Lori and Alex but occupied the central position linking Tammy’s death, the children’s deaths and the communications surrounding all three.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75940917Sat, 24 Oct 2026 12:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay 24 of Chad Daybell’s trial focused heavily on the prosecution’s effort to tie Chad, Lori Vallow and Alex Cox together through phone records, text messages and their behavior surrounding the deaths. FBI investigator Ricky Wright finished his...
Idaho Attorney General investigator Nicholas Edwards then walked jurors through an extensive timeline of Chad and Lori’s relationship and the events surrounding Tammy Daybell’s death. Jurors saw messages in which Chad described feeling trapped with Tammy and predicted that “permanent freedom” was coming, later told Lori he was “trying to hasten her departure,” and participated in conversations portraying Tammy as having been replaced by a demonic entity named Viola. Edwards also detailed the October 9, 2019 incident when Tammy reported that a masked man pointed what she initially described as a rifle at her, while records showed extensive communication involving Chad and Alex that day and later internet searches from Alex’s device involving rifles, suppressors and the thickness of vehicle doors. Prosecutors also emphasized that Alex’s phone was near the Salem church, roughly 2.6 miles from the Daybell residence, late on October 18—the night before Tammy died—before going silent for more than an hour. The morning after Tammy’s death, Chad was already exchanging romantic messages with Lori, discussing her return to Idaho, their future together and financial matters, while he ultimately collected payouts from Tammy’s life-insurance policies. John Prior attacked Edwards’ timeline as selective, pointed to gaps in Alex’s cellphone data and stressed that none of the messages explicitly contained an agreement to murder Tammy, JJ or Tylee. By the end of Day 24, however, prosecutors had assembled their evidence into a chronological narrative arguing that Chad was not simply connected to Lori and Alex but occupied the central position linking Tammy’s death, the children’s deaths and the communications surrounding all three.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2544alexcox,chaddaybell,chaddaybelltrial,courtroomcoverage,crimenews,daybellcase,daybelltrial,idahomurders,idahotruecrime,jjvalow,justiceforjjandtylee,lorivallow,lorivallowdaybell,murdertrial,tammydaybell,trialupdates,truecrime,truecrimecommunity,truecrimepodcast,tyleeryantruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-chad-daybell-trial-part-22-23-10-24-26--75940916
Day 23 shifted the prosecution’s attention toward Tammy Daybell’s death and Alex Cox’s movements around the times Tylee and JJ disappeared. Dr. Lily Marsden, who participated in Tammy’s autopsy after her body was exhumed, testified that Tammy died from asphyxia and that the manner of death was homicide, explaining that smothering, chest compression or another form of airway restriction could kill someone without leaving dramatic external injuries. She also described bruising on Tammy’s arms and chest as acute, meaning it occurred shortly before or around the time of death. FBI investigator Ricky Wright then used cellphone-location evidence to trace Alex Cox’s movements, placing Cox at Chad Daybell’s property during critical periods connected to both children’s deaths and burials. That evidence reinforced one of the prosecution’s central theories: Cox acted as the physical participant while Chad and Lori supplied the motive, direction and religious justification. By the end of Day 23, prosecutors had connected Tammy’s death to homicide through medical testimony while continuing to build the digital trail linking Cox to the locations where Tylee and JJ were ultimately found buried on Chad’s property.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75940916Sat, 24 Oct 2026 10:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay 22 of Chad Daybell’s trial focused heavily on the physical evidence surrounding the death and disposal of Tylee Ryan. FBI forensic anthropologist Dr. Angi Christensen testified that she examined more than 100 of Tylee’s bones and found fractures...
Day 23 shifted the prosecution’s attention toward Tammy Daybell’s death and Alex Cox’s movements around the times Tylee and JJ disappeared. Dr. Lily Marsden, who participated in Tammy’s autopsy after her body was exhumed, testified that Tammy died from asphyxia and that the manner of death was homicide, explaining that smothering, chest compression or another form of airway restriction could kill someone without leaving dramatic external injuries. She also described bruising on Tammy’s arms and chest as acute, meaning it occurred shortly before or around the time of death. FBI investigator Ricky Wright then used cellphone-location evidence to trace Alex Cox’s movements, placing Cox at Chad Daybell’s property during critical periods connected to both children’s deaths and burials. That evidence reinforced one of the prosecution’s central theories: Cox acted as the physical participant while Chad and Lori supplied the motive, direction and religious justification. By the end of Day 23, prosecutors had connected Tammy’s death to homicide through medical testimony while continuing to build the digital trail linking Cox to the locations where Tylee and JJ were ultimately found buried on Chad’s property.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3906alexcox,chaddaybell,chaddaybelltrial,courtroomcoverage,crimenews,daybellcase,daybelltrial,idahomurders,idahotruecrime,jjvalow,justiceforjjandtylee,lorivallow,lorivallowdaybell,murdertrial,tammydaybell,trialupdates,truecrime,truecrimecommunity,truecrimepodcast,tyleeryantruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-ghislaine-maxwell-begins-her-long-road-to-an-appeal-10-23-26--75940931
The appeal ultimately failed. In September 2024, the Second Circuit upheld Maxwell’s conviction and 20-year sentence, rejecting the argument that Epstein’s Florida agreement prevented prosecutors in New York from charging her. The appeals court concluded that the agreement bound the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida rather than every federal prosecutor in the country, and it also rejected Maxwell’s statute-of-limitations, juror-misconduct and sentencing arguments. Maxwell then sought rehearing before the full Second Circuit, but that request was denied in November 2024, pushing her legal team toward the Supreme Court. The significance of that early appeal was that Maxwell immediately made Epstein’s extraordinary 2007 deal one of the central pillars of her effort to escape her own conviction, arguing that the same agreement that had protected Epstein and unnamed potential co-conspirators years earlier should have protected her as well.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75940931Sat, 24 Oct 2026 08:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciGhislaine Maxwell launched her first major appeal of her conviction on February 28, 2023, asking the Second Circuit Court of Appeals to overturn her convictions or grant her a new trial. Her lawyers built the appeal around several arguments they had...
The appeal ultimately failed. In September 2024, the Second Circuit upheld Maxwell’s conviction and 20-year sentence, rejecting the argument that Epstein’s Florida agreement prevented prosecutors in New York from charging her. The appeals court concluded that the agreement bound the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida rather than every federal prosecutor in the country, and it also rejected Maxwell’s statute-of-limitations, juror-misconduct and sentencing arguments. Maxwell then sought rehearing before the full Second Circuit, but that request was denied in November 2024, pushing her legal team toward the Supreme Court. The significance of that early appeal was that Maxwell immediately made Epstein’s extraordinary 2007 deal one of the central pillars of her effort to escape her own conviction, arguing that the same agreement that had protected Epstein and unnamed potential co-conspirators years earlier should have protected her as well.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2443epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-his-navigation-of-the-french-legal-system-10-23-26--75940930
The French investigation did not simply disappear with the deaths of Epstein and Brunel. After the original judicial proceeding was closed in 2023 following Brunel’s death, the enormous release of Epstein-related records in the United States prompted French prosecutors to reopen and substantially broaden their examination of the case in 2026. Paris prosecutors announced new investigations into human trafficking as well as possible financial crimes including money laundering, tax fraud and breaches of public integrity, while ordering a comprehensive reanalysis of evidence gathered during the earlier investigation. Authorities were now able to compare years of French witness testimony and investigative material with millions of newly released American records, including evidence involving Epstein’s activities in Paris and Saint-Tropez, his relationships with recruiters and associates, and the international movement of young women through the network. The result was that France had been investigating the French side of the Epstein-Maxwell operation since 2019, with interruptions and serious questions about the pace of the inquiry, but the investigation had ultimately expanded rather than disappeared as new evidence became available.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75940930Sat, 24 Oct 2026 06:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciFrench authorities had been investigating Jeffrey Epstein’s network for years, beginning in August 2019 when the Paris prosecutor’s office opened a preliminary investigation into allegations of rape, sexual assault of minors and criminal conspiracy....
The French investigation did not simply disappear with the deaths of Epstein and Brunel. After the original judicial proceeding was closed in 2023 following Brunel’s death, the enormous release of Epstein-related records in the United States prompted French prosecutors to reopen and substantially broaden their examination of the case in 2026. Paris prosecutors announced new investigations into human trafficking as well as possible financial crimes including money laundering, tax fraud and breaches of public integrity, while ordering a comprehensive reanalysis of evidence gathered during the earlier investigation. Authorities were now able to compare years of French witness testimony and investigative material with millions of newly released American records, including evidence involving Epstein’s activities in Paris and Saint-Tropez, his relationships with recruiters and associates, and the international movement of young women through the network. The result was that France had been investigating the French side of the Epstein-Maxwell operation since 2019, with interruptions and serious questions about the pace of the inquiry, but the investigation had ultimately expanded rather than disappeared as new evidence became available.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2653epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/gretchen-rhodes-tells-her-story-of-abuse-at-the-hands-of-maxwell-and-epstein-part-2--75940449Gretchen Rhodes has come forward with disturbing claims about her time on Jeffrey Epstein’s private island, alleging that she was recruited directly by Ghislaine Maxwell under the pretense of a legitimate job. According to Rhodes, Maxwell brought her on as a masseuse in 2001 and quickly established strict, demeaning rules—she was told to speak only when spoken to and to keep everything she witnessed confidential. Rhodes says that after a short period of “testing,” she was introduced to Epstein himself, who began making inappropriate demands under the guise of professional massages. These encounters escalated into sexual misconduct, with Epstein allegedly coercing her to touch him in ways that made her uncomfortable and frightened, all while Maxwell looked on or facilitated the dynamic.

Rhodes also claims that Epstein used promises of fame and opportunity to manipulate her emotionally, claiming he could launch her singing career and even arranging meetings with supposed music executives in New York. These promises, she says, were part of a deliberate grooming tactic—offering hope while quietly eroding her autonomy. The entire environment, as described by Rhodes, was cloaked in silence and psychological control. Her allegations highlight not only Epstein’s predatory methods but also Maxwell’s active role in managing and sustaining the abuse. Rhodes’s story is another example of how Epstein’s operation disguised exploitation as opportunity and how those around him, like Maxwell, helped maintain that illusion.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

https://inews.co.uk/news/crime/ghislaine-maxwell-victim-reveals-abuse-jeffrey-epstein-1718952

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75940449Sat, 24 Oct 2026 04:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciGretchen Rhodes has come forward with disturbing claims about her time on Jeffrey Epstein’s private island, alleging that she was recruited directly by Ghislaine Maxwell under the pretense of a legitimate job. According to Rhodes, Maxwell brought her...Gretchen Rhodes has come forward with disturbing claims about her time on Jeffrey Epstein’s private island, alleging that she was recruited directly by Ghislaine Maxwell under the pretense of a legitimate job. According to Rhodes, Maxwell brought her on as a masseuse in 2001 and quickly established strict, demeaning rules—she was told to speak only when spoken to and to keep everything she witnessed confidential. Rhodes says that after a short period of “testing,” she was introduced to Epstein himself, who began making inappropriate demands under the guise of professional massages. These encounters escalated into sexual misconduct, with Epstein allegedly coercing her to touch him in ways that made her uncomfortable and frightened, all while Maxwell looked on or facilitated the dynamic.

Rhodes also claims that Epstein used promises of fame and opportunity to manipulate her emotionally, claiming he could launch her singing career and even arranging meetings with supposed music executives in New York. These promises, she says, were part of a deliberate grooming tactic—offering hope while quietly eroding her autonomy. The entire environment, as described by Rhodes, was cloaked in silence and psychological control. Her allegations highlight not only Epstein’s predatory methods but also Maxwell’s active role in managing and sustaining the abuse. Rhodes’s story is another example of how Epstein’s operation disguised exploitation as opportunity and how those around him, like Maxwell, helped maintain that illusion.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

https://inews.co.uk/news/crime/ghislaine-maxwell-victim-reveals-abuse-jeffrey-epstein-1718952

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1169epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/gretchen-rhodes-tells-her-story-of-abuse-at-the-hands-of-maxwell-and-epstein-part-1--75940448Gretchen Rhodes has come forward with disturbing claims about her time on Jeffrey Epstein’s private island, alleging that she was recruited directly by Ghislaine Maxwell under the pretense of a legitimate job. According to Rhodes, Maxwell brought her on as a masseuse in 2001 and quickly established strict, demeaning rules—she was told to speak only when spoken to and to keep everything she witnessed confidential. Rhodes says that after a short period of “testing,” she was introduced to Epstein himself, who began making inappropriate demands under the guise of professional massages. These encounters escalated into sexual misconduct, with Epstein allegedly coercing her to touch him in ways that made her uncomfortable and frightened, all while Maxwell looked on or facilitated the dynamic.

Rhodes also claims that Epstein used promises of fame and opportunity to manipulate her emotionally, claiming he could launch her singing career and even arranging meetings with supposed music executives in New York. These promises, she says, were part of a deliberate grooming tactic—offering hope while quietly eroding her autonomy. The entire environment, as described by Rhodes, was cloaked in silence and psychological control. Her allegations highlight not only Epstein’s predatory methods but also Maxwell’s active role in managing and sustaining the abuse. Rhodes’s story is another example of how Epstein’s operation disguised exploitation as opportunity and how those around him, like Maxwell, helped maintain that illusion.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

https://inews.co.uk/news/crime/ghislaine-maxwell-victim-reveals-abuse-jeffrey-epstein-1718952

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75940448Sat, 24 Oct 2026 02:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciGretchen Rhodes has come forward with disturbing claims about her time on Jeffrey Epstein’s private island, alleging that she was recruited directly by Ghislaine Maxwell under the pretense of a legitimate job. According to Rhodes, Maxwell brought her...Gretchen Rhodes has come forward with disturbing claims about her time on Jeffrey Epstein’s private island, alleging that she was recruited directly by Ghislaine Maxwell under the pretense of a legitimate job. According to Rhodes, Maxwell brought her on as a masseuse in 2001 and quickly established strict, demeaning rules—she was told to speak only when spoken to and to keep everything she witnessed confidential. Rhodes says that after a short period of “testing,” she was introduced to Epstein himself, who began making inappropriate demands under the guise of professional massages. These encounters escalated into sexual misconduct, with Epstein allegedly coercing her to touch him in ways that made her uncomfortable and frightened, all while Maxwell looked on or facilitated the dynamic.

Rhodes also claims that Epstein used promises of fame and opportunity to manipulate her emotionally, claiming he could launch her singing career and even arranging meetings with supposed music executives in New York. These promises, she says, were part of a deliberate grooming tactic—offering hope while quietly eroding her autonomy. The entire environment, as described by Rhodes, was cloaked in silence and psychological control. Her allegations highlight not only Epstein’s predatory methods but also Maxwell’s active role in managing and sustaining the abuse. Rhodes’s story is another example of how Epstein’s operation disguised exploitation as opportunity and how those around him, like Maxwell, helped maintain that illusion.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

https://inews.co.uk/news/crime/ghislaine-maxwell-victim-reveals-abuse-jeffrey-epstein-1718952

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1048epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcript-day-5-part-2-10-23-26--75925566
The final day also became consumed by a dispute over courtroom cameras after Robinson’s alleged handwritten confession note had accidentally appeared on the public livestream for several seconds the previous day despite Judge Tony Graf ordering that it not be broadcast. Robinson’s attorneys argued that repeated violations threatened his ability to receive a fair trial and asked Graf to reconsider allowing cameras in the courtroom. Graf responded by prohibiting additional exhibits from being displayed publicly for the remainder of the hearing, although he later allowed an enhanced surveillance compilation from Utah Valley University to be shown inside the courtroom to Charlie Kirk’s family. That video allegedly tracked Robinson’s movements around campus, including a figure prosecutors identified as Robinson reaching the roof, moving into what the state described as a sniper position and then fleeing toward the wooded area after the shooting. Robinson declined to testify on the advice of his attorneys, the defense rested, and prosecutors presented no rebuttal evidence. Instead of immediately arguing whether Robinson should be bound over for trial, both sides were given time to file written briefs, with oral arguments scheduled for September 1 before Graf decided whether prosecutors had established probable cause for the case to proceed.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75925566Sat, 24 Oct 2026 00:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciDay five of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing focused heavily on the defense effort to weaken the prosecution’s DNA evidence. The defense called ATF DNA Section Chief Caitlin Oliver, who had performed testing on evidence including the rifle...
The final day also became consumed by a dispute over courtroom cameras after Robinson’s alleged handwritten confession note had accidentally appeared on the public livestream for several seconds the previous day despite Judge Tony Graf ordering that it not be broadcast. Robinson’s attorneys argued that repeated violations threatened his ability to receive a fair trial and asked Graf to reconsider allowing cameras in the courtroom. Graf responded by prohibiting additional exhibits from being displayed publicly for the remainder of the hearing, although he later allowed an enhanced surveillance compilation from Utah Valley University to be shown inside the courtroom to Charlie Kirk’s family. That video allegedly tracked Robinson’s movements around campus, including a figure prosecutors identified as Robinson reaching the roof, moving into what the state described as a sniper position and then fleeing toward the wooded area after the shooting. Robinson declined to testify on the advice of his attorneys, the defense rested, and prosecutors presented no rebuttal evidence. Instead of immediately arguing whether Robinson should be bound over for trial, both sides were given time to file written briefs, with oral arguments scheduled for September 1 before Graf decided whether prosecutors had established probable cause for the case to proceed.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>731breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcript-day-5-part-1-10-22-26--75925568
The final day also became consumed by a dispute over courtroom cameras after Robinson’s alleged handwritten confession note had accidentally appeared on the public livestream for several seconds the previous day despite Judge Tony Graf ordering that it not be broadcast. Robinson’s attorneys argued that repeated violations threatened his ability to receive a fair trial and asked Graf to reconsider allowing cameras in the courtroom. Graf responded by prohibiting additional exhibits from being displayed publicly for the remainder of the hearing, although he later allowed an enhanced surveillance compilation from Utah Valley University to be shown inside the courtroom to Charlie Kirk’s family. That video allegedly tracked Robinson’s movements around campus, including a figure prosecutors identified as Robinson reaching the roof, moving into what the state described as a sniper position and then fleeing toward the wooded area after the shooting. Robinson declined to testify on the advice of his attorneys, the defense rested, and prosecutors presented no rebuttal evidence. Instead of immediately arguing whether Robinson should be bound over for trial, both sides were given time to file written briefs, with oral arguments scheduled for September 1 before Graf decided whether prosecutors had established probable cause for the case to proceed.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75925568Fri, 23 Oct 2026 22:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay five of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing focused heavily on the defense effort to weaken the prosecution’s DNA evidence. The defense called ATF DNA Section Chief Caitlin Oliver, who had performed testing on evidence including the rifle...
The final day also became consumed by a dispute over courtroom cameras after Robinson’s alleged handwritten confession note had accidentally appeared on the public livestream for several seconds the previous day despite Judge Tony Graf ordering that it not be broadcast. Robinson’s attorneys argued that repeated violations threatened his ability to receive a fair trial and asked Graf to reconsider allowing cameras in the courtroom. Graf responded by prohibiting additional exhibits from being displayed publicly for the remainder of the hearing, although he later allowed an enhanced surveillance compilation from Utah Valley University to be shown inside the courtroom to Charlie Kirk’s family. That video allegedly tracked Robinson’s movements around campus, including a figure prosecutors identified as Robinson reaching the roof, moving into what the state described as a sniper position and then fleeing toward the wooded area after the shooting. Robinson declined to testify on the advice of his attorneys, the defense rested, and prosecutors presented no rebuttal evidence. Instead of immediately arguing whether Robinson should be bound over for trial, both sides were given time to file written briefs, with oral arguments scheduled for September 1 before Graf decided whether prosecutors had established probable cause for the case to proceed.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>989breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/new-mexico-s-lawsuit-filed-against-epstein-executors-darren-indyke-and-richard-kahn-part-3-10-23-26--75925562
The lawsuit went considerably further than simply seeking damages from Epstein’s estate. New Mexico brought claims under the federal Trafficking Victims Protection Act and the New Mexico Racketeering Act, accusing Indyke and Kahn of participating in racketeering predicates involving kidnapping, criminal solicitation and conspiracy, while also seeking restitution for unjust enrichment. The complaint cited multiple Jane Does who allegedly were transported to Zorro Ranch through deception, intimidation or coercion and sexually abused there, and it alleged that Indyke and Kahn helped finance the system that recruited and maintained access to those victims. The financial stakes were enormous because both men now serve as co-executors of Epstein’s estate and trustees and beneficiaries of the 1953 Trust; the complaint said Indyke could receive up to $50 million and Kahn up to $25 million from an estate still valued at more than $107 million. New Mexico asked the court to block estate distributions while the case proceeds, force the defendants to disgorge allegedly ill-gotten gains, award restitution, compensatory and punitive damages, potentially triple racketeering damages, and direct assets toward people harmed by the alleged enterprise. These remain civil allegations that Indyke and Kahn will have the opportunity to contest, but the filing represents one of the most aggressive attempts yet to hold Epstein’s financial inner circle legally responsible for allegedly enabling the machinery around his trafficking operation.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


gov.uscourts.nmd.576774.1.0_1.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75925562Fri, 23 Oct 2026 20:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciNew Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez accused Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn of being active financial and administrative participants in what the complaint called the “Epstein Enterprise,” rather than merely Jeffrey Epstein’s lawyer and accountant....
The lawsuit went considerably further than simply seeking damages from Epstein’s estate. New Mexico brought claims under the federal Trafficking Victims Protection Act and the New Mexico Racketeering Act, accusing Indyke and Kahn of participating in racketeering predicates involving kidnapping, criminal solicitation and conspiracy, while also seeking restitution for unjust enrichment. The complaint cited multiple Jane Does who allegedly were transported to Zorro Ranch through deception, intimidation or coercion and sexually abused there, and it alleged that Indyke and Kahn helped finance the system that recruited and maintained access to those victims. The financial stakes were enormous because both men now serve as co-executors of Epstein’s estate and trustees and beneficiaries of the 1953 Trust; the complaint said Indyke could receive up to $50 million and Kahn up to $25 million from an estate still valued at more than $107 million. New Mexico asked the court to block estate distributions while the case proceeds, force the defendants to disgorge allegedly ill-gotten gains, award restitution, compensatory and punitive damages, potentially triple racketeering damages, and direct assets toward people harmed by the alleged enterprise. These remain civil allegations that Indyke and Kahn will have the opportunity to contest, but the filing represents one of the most aggressive attempts yet to hold Epstein’s financial inner circle legally responsible for allegedly enabling the machinery around his trafficking operation.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


gov.uscourts.nmd.576774.1.0_1.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>678epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/new-mexico-s-lawsuit-filed-against-epstein-executors-darren-indyke-and-richard-kahn-part-2-10-23-26--75925563
The lawsuit went considerably further than simply seeking damages from Epstein’s estate. New Mexico brought claims under the federal Trafficking Victims Protection Act and the New Mexico Racketeering Act, accusing Indyke and Kahn of participating in racketeering predicates involving kidnapping, criminal solicitation and conspiracy, while also seeking restitution for unjust enrichment. The complaint cited multiple Jane Does who allegedly were transported to Zorro Ranch through deception, intimidation or coercion and sexually abused there, and it alleged that Indyke and Kahn helped finance the system that recruited and maintained access to those victims. The financial stakes were enormous because both men now serve as co-executors of Epstein’s estate and trustees and beneficiaries of the 1953 Trust; the complaint said Indyke could receive up to $50 million and Kahn up to $25 million from an estate still valued at more than $107 million. New Mexico asked the court to block estate distributions while the case proceeds, force the defendants to disgorge allegedly ill-gotten gains, award restitution, compensatory and punitive damages, potentially triple racketeering damages, and direct assets toward people harmed by the alleged enterprise. These remain civil allegations that Indyke and Kahn will have the opportunity to contest, but the filing represents one of the most aggressive attempts yet to hold Epstein’s financial inner circle legally responsible for allegedly enabling the machinery around his trafficking operation.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


gov.uscourts.nmd.576774.1.0_1.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75925563Fri, 23 Oct 2026 18:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciNew Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez accused Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn of being active financial and administrative participants in what the complaint called the “Epstein Enterprise,” rather than merely Jeffrey Epstein’s lawyer and accountant....
The lawsuit went considerably further than simply seeking damages from Epstein’s estate. New Mexico brought claims under the federal Trafficking Victims Protection Act and the New Mexico Racketeering Act, accusing Indyke and Kahn of participating in racketeering predicates involving kidnapping, criminal solicitation and conspiracy, while also seeking restitution for unjust enrichment. The complaint cited multiple Jane Does who allegedly were transported to Zorro Ranch through deception, intimidation or coercion and sexually abused there, and it alleged that Indyke and Kahn helped finance the system that recruited and maintained access to those victims. The financial stakes were enormous because both men now serve as co-executors of Epstein’s estate and trustees and beneficiaries of the 1953 Trust; the complaint said Indyke could receive up to $50 million and Kahn up to $25 million from an estate still valued at more than $107 million. New Mexico asked the court to block estate distributions while the case proceeds, force the defendants to disgorge allegedly ill-gotten gains, award restitution, compensatory and punitive damages, potentially triple racketeering damages, and direct assets toward people harmed by the alleged enterprise. These remain civil allegations that Indyke and Kahn will have the opportunity to contest, but the filing represents one of the most aggressive attempts yet to hold Epstein’s financial inner circle legally responsible for allegedly enabling the machinery around his trafficking operation.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


gov.uscourts.nmd.576774.1.0_1.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>888epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/new-mexico-s-lawsuit-filed-against-epstein-executors-darren-indyke-and-richard-kahn-part-1-10-23-26--75925564
The lawsuit went considerably further than simply seeking damages from Epstein’s estate. New Mexico brought claims under the federal Trafficking Victims Protection Act and the New Mexico Racketeering Act, accusing Indyke and Kahn of participating in racketeering predicates involving kidnapping, criminal solicitation and conspiracy, while also seeking restitution for unjust enrichment. The complaint cited multiple Jane Does who allegedly were transported to Zorro Ranch through deception, intimidation or coercion and sexually abused there, and it alleged that Indyke and Kahn helped finance the system that recruited and maintained access to those victims. The financial stakes were enormous because both men now serve as co-executors of Epstein’s estate and trustees and beneficiaries of the 1953 Trust; the complaint said Indyke could receive up to $50 million and Kahn up to $25 million from an estate still valued at more than $107 million. New Mexico asked the court to block estate distributions while the case proceeds, force the defendants to disgorge allegedly ill-gotten gains, award restitution, compensatory and punitive damages, potentially triple racketeering damages, and direct assets toward people harmed by the alleged enterprise. These remain civil allegations that Indyke and Kahn will have the opportunity to contest, but the filing represents one of the most aggressive attempts yet to hold Epstein’s financial inner circle legally responsible for allegedly enabling the machinery around his trafficking operation.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


gov.uscourts.nmd.576774.1.0_1.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75925564Fri, 23 Oct 2026 17:12:45 +0000Bobby CapucciNew Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez accused Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn of being active financial and administrative participants in what the complaint called the “Epstein Enterprise,” rather than merely Jeffrey Epstein’s lawyer and accountant....
The lawsuit went considerably further than simply seeking damages from Epstein’s estate. New Mexico brought claims under the federal Trafficking Victims Protection Act and the New Mexico Racketeering Act, accusing Indyke and Kahn of participating in racketeering predicates involving kidnapping, criminal solicitation and conspiracy, while also seeking restitution for unjust enrichment. The complaint cited multiple Jane Does who allegedly were transported to Zorro Ranch through deception, intimidation or coercion and sexually abused there, and it alleged that Indyke and Kahn helped finance the system that recruited and maintained access to those victims. The financial stakes were enormous because both men now serve as co-executors of Epstein’s estate and trustees and beneficiaries of the 1953 Trust; the complaint said Indyke could receive up to $50 million and Kahn up to $25 million from an estate still valued at more than $107 million. New Mexico asked the court to block estate distributions while the case proceeds, force the defendants to disgorge allegedly ill-gotten gains, award restitution, compensatory and punitive damages, potentially triple racketeering damages, and direct assets toward people harmed by the alleged enterprise. These remain civil allegations that Indyke and Kahn will have the opportunity to contest, but the filing represents one of the most aggressive attempts yet to hold Epstein’s financial inner circle legally responsible for allegedly enabling the machinery around his trafficking operation.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


gov.uscourts.nmd.576774.1.0_1.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>689epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/new-mexico-alleges-indyke-and-kahn-helped-sustain-epstein-operation-10-23-26--75925565
The financial stakes were substantial because Indyke and Kahn were not only Epstein’s longtime advisers but also became co-executors of his estate and trustees and beneficiaries of the 1953 Trust. The complaint alleged that Indyke could receive as much as $50 million and Kahn as much as $25 million from an estate currently valued at more than $107 million, creating what survivors described as an extraordinary conflict in which the same men helping administer victim settlements could eventually inherit what remained. Torrez’s office said the goal was to recover damages for survivors, prevent defendants from benefiting from an alleged trafficking enterprise and hold accountable people who allegedly helped sustain Epstein’s operation long after his crimes should have been obvious. Indyke and Kahn emphatically denied the allegations, calling the lawsuit baseless and stressing that no survivor had accused either man of committing or witnessing sexual abuse or of being directly told about Epstein’s abuse. Neither man had been criminally charged in connection with Epstein’s crimes, making the New Mexico lawsuit a major new attempt to test their claimed lack of knowledge against the financial and corporate record surrounding Epstein’s operation.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Epstein lawyer and accountant ‘knowingly participated’ in his sex trafficking, New Mexico AG claims in suit | The Independent

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75925565Fri, 23 Oct 2026 14:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciNew Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez filed a federal lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime attorney Darren Indyke, accountant Richard Kahn, Epstein’s estate and the 1953 Trust, alleging that Indyke and Kahn knowingly helped facilitate, finance...
The financial stakes were substantial because Indyke and Kahn were not only Epstein’s longtime advisers but also became co-executors of his estate and trustees and beneficiaries of the 1953 Trust. The complaint alleged that Indyke could receive as much as $50 million and Kahn as much as $25 million from an estate currently valued at more than $107 million, creating what survivors described as an extraordinary conflict in which the same men helping administer victim settlements could eventually inherit what remained. Torrez’s office said the goal was to recover damages for survivors, prevent defendants from benefiting from an alleged trafficking enterprise and hold accountable people who allegedly helped sustain Epstein’s operation long after his crimes should have been obvious. Indyke and Kahn emphatically denied the allegations, calling the lawsuit baseless and stressing that no survivor had accused either man of committing or witnessing sexual abuse or of being directly told about Epstein’s abuse. Neither man had been criminally charged in connection with Epstein’s crimes, making the New Mexico lawsuit a major new attempt to test their claimed lack of knowledge against the financial and corporate record surrounding Epstein’s operation.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Epstein lawyer and accountant ‘knowingly participated’ in his sex trafficking, New Mexico AG claims in suit | The Independent

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>994epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/robert-mazur-urges-special-counsel-for-epstein-files-review-10-23-26--75925567
Mazur called for an independent special counsel to conduct a comprehensive review of the millions of pages of Epstein and Maxwell records held by federal authorities, identify anyone who could still be prosecuted and ultimately publish the investigation’s findings. He argued that Attorney General Pam Bondi and Blanche should recuse themselves because of their previous professional and financial connections to Trump, and he rejected the idea that a highly partisan congressional investigation was the best vehicle for uncovering the truth. Instead, Mazur proposed allowing Maxwell to exhaust her appeals and then compelling her testimony before a grand jury, potentially through immunity that would force her to answer questions without reducing her existing 20-year sentence. His larger argument was that investigators already possessed enormous amounts of evidence and testimony from survivors and therefore did not need to bargain with Maxwell for her version of events; what was missing, in his view, was an independent investigation willing to follow that evidence wherever it led, regardless of the wealth or political power of the people involved.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75925567Fri, 23 Oct 2026 12:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciFormer federal agent Robert Mazur argued that investigators should stop treating Ghislaine Maxwell as a uniquely valuable source of truth about Jeffrey Epstein’s network and instead build the investigation around survivors, documentary evidence and...
Mazur called for an independent special counsel to conduct a comprehensive review of the millions of pages of Epstein and Maxwell records held by federal authorities, identify anyone who could still be prosecuted and ultimately publish the investigation’s findings. He argued that Attorney General Pam Bondi and Blanche should recuse themselves because of their previous professional and financial connections to Trump, and he rejected the idea that a highly partisan congressional investigation was the best vehicle for uncovering the truth. Instead, Mazur proposed allowing Maxwell to exhaust her appeals and then compelling her testimony before a grand jury, potentially through immunity that would force her to answer questions without reducing her existing 20-year sentence. His larger argument was that investigators already possessed enormous amounts of evidence and testimony from survivors and therefore did not need to bargain with Maxwell for her version of events; what was missing, in his view, was an independent investigation willing to follow that evidence wherever it led, regardless of the wealth or political power of the people involved.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1072epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-chad-daybell-trial-part-21-10-23-26--75923126
The afternoon shifted toward the prosecution’s attempt to show that Chad and Lori had been planning a future together long before Tammy died. FBI tactical specialist Nicole Heideman testified that Chad had searched for malachite as early as March 2019 and that both Chad and Lori were researching the stone while Charles Vallow and Tammy were still alive. Lori later attempted to purchase malachite wedding rings in August and October, and investigators found records showing Chad and Lori discussing Hawaii and “the plan” months before they eventually married there on November 5, 2019. Heideman also walked jurors through temple attendance records showing Chad and Lori visiting temples together before Charles’ death and read portions of Chad’s “James and Elena” story, a thinly disguised account of his relationship with Lori in which the two characters were portrayed as eternal companions reunited across previous lives. The story closely mirrored real events, including their first meeting, temple visits and belief that they had a special divine mission together, giving prosecutors another way to argue that the affair and future marriage were not spontaneous developments after Tammy’s death but part of a relationship Chad had been cultivating for many months.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75923126Fri, 23 Oct 2026 10:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay twenty-one of Chad Daybell’s trial focused heavily on Tammy Daybell’s health, Chad’s behavior after her death and testimony from Tammy’s sister Samantha Gwilliam and her husband Jason. Former deputy coroner Cammy Willmore testified that when she...
The afternoon shifted toward the prosecution’s attempt to show that Chad and Lori had been planning a future together long before Tammy died. FBI tactical specialist Nicole Heideman testified that Chad had searched for malachite as early as March 2019 and that both Chad and Lori were researching the stone while Charles Vallow and Tammy were still alive. Lori later attempted to purchase malachite wedding rings in August and October, and investigators found records showing Chad and Lori discussing Hawaii and “the plan” months before they eventually married there on November 5, 2019. Heideman also walked jurors through temple attendance records showing Chad and Lori visiting temples together before Charles’ death and read portions of Chad’s “James and Elena” story, a thinly disguised account of his relationship with Lori in which the two characters were portrayed as eternal companions reunited across previous lives. The story closely mirrored real events, including their first meeting, temple visits and belief that they had a special divine mission together, giving prosecutors another way to argue that the affair and future marriage were not spontaneous developments after Tammy’s death but part of a relationship Chad had been cultivating for many months.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2958chaddaybell,chaddaybelltrial,courtroomcoverage,daybellcase,daybellmurders,doomsdaycouple,doomsdayprophet,idahomurders,idahotruecrime,jjandtylee,justiceforjj,justicefortammy,justicefortylee,lorivallow,lorivallowdaybell,murdertrial,tammydaybell,truecrime,truecrimecommunity,truecrimepodcasttruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-chad-daybell-trial-part-19-20-10-23-26--75923128
Day twenty tied physical evidence, Chad’s own words and the couple’s behavior after the children disappeared even more tightly together. Kauai Police Sgt. Colin Nesbitt testified about confronting Chad and Lori in Hawaii in January 2020 and serving Lori with an order requiring her to produce JJ and Tylee. When officers later searched their belongings, they found Tylee’s debit card, an iPad marked “JJ,” multiple copies of Charles Vallow’s death certificate, birth certificates, laptops, credit cards and roughly $10,500 in cash—even though the children themselves were nowhere to be found. FBI analyst Benjamin Dean then highlighted Chad’s now-infamous September 9, 2019 text to Tammy describing shooting a raccoon and burying it in the pet cemetery, a message sent one day after Tylee was last seen alive and on the same property where her remains were eventually discovered. Idaho State Police forensic biologist Katherine Dace testified that human remains on a shovel matched Tylee’s DNA and that material on a pickaxe also produced a partial profile consistent with her; she also said a hair recovered near JJ was overwhelmingly likely to have come from Lori. The day ended with three of Tammy’s former co-workers describing her as energetic, healthy and active immediately before her death, directly contradicting the defense narrative that Tammy had been seriously ill or physically declining.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75923128Fri, 23 Oct 2026 08:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay nineteen of Chad Daybell’s trial continued with some of the most graphic forensic evidence of the case as Dr. Garth Warren finished walking jurors through the autopsies of JJ Vallow and Tylee Ryan. Jurors were shown photographs documenting JJ’s...
Day twenty tied physical evidence, Chad’s own words and the couple’s behavior after the children disappeared even more tightly together. Kauai Police Sgt. Colin Nesbitt testified about confronting Chad and Lori in Hawaii in January 2020 and serving Lori with an order requiring her to produce JJ and Tylee. When officers later searched their belongings, they found Tylee’s debit card, an iPad marked “JJ,” multiple copies of Charles Vallow’s death certificate, birth certificates, laptops, credit cards and roughly $10,500 in cash—even though the children themselves were nowhere to be found. FBI analyst Benjamin Dean then highlighted Chad’s now-infamous September 9, 2019 text to Tammy describing shooting a raccoon and burying it in the pet cemetery, a message sent one day after Tylee was last seen alive and on the same property where her remains were eventually discovered. Idaho State Police forensic biologist Katherine Dace testified that human remains on a shovel matched Tylee’s DNA and that material on a pickaxe also produced a partial profile consistent with her; she also said a hair recovered near JJ was overwhelmingly likely to have come from Lori. The day ended with three of Tammy’s former co-workers describing her as energetic, healthy and active immediately before her death, directly contradicting the defense narrative that Tammy had been seriously ill or physically declining.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3998chaddaybell,chaddaybelltrial,courtroomcoverage,daybellcase,daybellmurders,doomsdaycouple,doomsdayprophet,idahomurders,idahotruecrime,jjandtylee,justiceforjj,justicefortammy,justicefortylee,lorivallow,lorivallowdaybell,murdertrial,tammydaybell,truecrime,truecrimecommunity,truecrimepodcasttruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-chad-daybell-trial-part-18-10-22-26--75923127
The afternoon shifted to some of the most graphic medical evidence of the trial when forensic pathologist Dr. Garth Warren testified about the autopsies of JJ and Tylee. Warren concluded that JJ died from asphyxia caused by a plastic bag placed over his head and duct tape covering his mouth, and he described bruising on JJ’s arms, abrasions on his neck and hemorrhaging beneath a thumbnail that indicated trauma before death. He found no natural disease that could explain JJ’s death. Tylee’s remains presented an entirely different forensic problem because her body had been dismembered, burned and recovered in multiple bags mixed with dirt and debris. Warren classified her death as a homicide by unspecified means because there was too little intact tissue remaining to determine exactly how she had been killed. Toxicology testing detected several substances, including GHB, but Warren cautioned that GHB could have developed naturally during decomposition and said nothing in Tylee’s known medical history explained her death. Day eighteen therefore connected the prosecution’s ideological case directly to the physical evidence: jurors first heard how Chad’s circle had labeled the victims dark or possessed and then heard a medical examiner describe in clinical detail what had actually been done to JJ and Tylee.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75923127Fri, 23 Oct 2026 06:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciDay eighteen of Chad Daybell’s trial centered first on Zulema Pastenes, the widow of Lori Vallow’s brother Alex Cox, who gave jurors another firsthand account of the belief system Chad and Lori had built around themselves. Pastenes testified that Chad...
The afternoon shifted to some of the most graphic medical evidence of the trial when forensic pathologist Dr. Garth Warren testified about the autopsies of JJ and Tylee. Warren concluded that JJ died from asphyxia caused by a plastic bag placed over his head and duct tape covering his mouth, and he described bruising on JJ’s arms, abrasions on his neck and hemorrhaging beneath a thumbnail that indicated trauma before death. He found no natural disease that could explain JJ’s death. Tylee’s remains presented an entirely different forensic problem because her body had been dismembered, burned and recovered in multiple bags mixed with dirt and debris. Warren classified her death as a homicide by unspecified means because there was too little intact tissue remaining to determine exactly how she had been killed. Toxicology testing detected several substances, including GHB, but Warren cautioned that GHB could have developed naturally during decomposition and said nothing in Tylee’s known medical history explained her death. Day eighteen therefore connected the prosecution’s ideological case directly to the physical evidence: jurors first heard how Chad’s circle had labeled the victims dark or possessed and then heard a medical examiner describe in clinical detail what had actually been done to JJ and Tylee.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3503chaddaybell,chaddaybelltrial,courtroomcoverage,daybellcase,daybellmurders,doomsdaycouple,doomsdayprophet,idahomurders,idahotruecrime,jjandtylee,justiceforjj,justicefortammy,justicefortylee,lorivallow,lorivallowdaybell,murdertrial,tammydaybell,truecrime,truecrimecommunity,truecrimepodcasttruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/shyne-drops-all-the-tea-about-the-diddy-nightclub-shooting-and-how-it-cost-him-8-years-of-his-life--75923165

Despite the past grievances, Shyne has indicated that he holds no current animosity toward Diddy. In a recent interview, he mentioned that he has "no problem with Diddy" and appreciates any contributions Diddy has made to help the people of Belize. Shyne, now a politician in Belize, emphasizes that his focus is on his political career and serving his country, rather than dwelling on past events.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



soruce:

Ex-Rapper Who Took the Fall for Diddy: ‘He Pretends to Be Sorry’

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75923165Fri, 23 Oct 2026 04:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciRapper Shyne, born Moses Michael Levi Barrow, has recently spoken out about the 1999 nightclub shooting in New York City, expressing that he was made the "fall guy" for the incident. He contends that while he was defending himself and others during...

Despite the past grievances, Shyne has indicated that he holds no current animosity toward Diddy. In a recent interview, he mentioned that he has "no problem with Diddy" and appreciates any contributions Diddy has made to help the people of Belize. Shyne, now a politician in Belize, emphasizes that his focus is on his political career and serving his country, rather than dwelling on past events.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



soruce:

Ex-Rapper Who Took the Fall for Diddy: ‘He Pretends to Be Sorry’

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>717breakingnews,dailydiddyreport,diddy,diddydiaries,diddynews,diddynewscentral,diddynewsdaily,diddynewsupdates,diddyontrial,diddytrial,diddytrialnews,diddytrialnewsupdate,diddytrialupdates,news,newsupdate,seancombs,seancombsnews,seandiddycombstrial,thetrialofdiddy,truecrimetruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/how-the-diddy-white-parties-fit-into-the-overall-investigation--75923164

In this episode, we take a look at how prosecutors are going over these parties and how and where they might fit in with the overall investigation into Diddy's alleged crimes.




to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

The parties that led to the downfall of Sean 'Diddy' Combs (bbc.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75923164Fri, 23 Oct 2026 02:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDiddy's infamous "White Parties," which he hosted from the late 1990s into the 2000s, are now under scrutiny by prosecutors. These lavish, star-studded events, once celebrated for their glamour, have been reinterpreted as a venue where some of his...

In this episode, we take a look at how prosecutors are going over these parties and how and where they might fit in with the overall investigation into Diddy's alleged crimes.




to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

The parties that led to the downfall of Sean 'Diddy' Combs (bbc.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1390breakingnews,dailydiddyreport,diddy,diddydiaries,diddynews,diddynewscentral,diddynewsdaily,diddynewsupdates,diddyontrial,diddytrial,diddytrialnews,diddytrialnewsupdate,diddytrialupdates,news,newsupdate,seancombs,seancombsnews,seandiddycombstrial,thetrialofdiddy,truecrimetruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcript-day-4-part-20-10-22-26--75905167

The state also spent a significant portion of the day strengthening the forensic connection between Robinson and the physical evidence. Investigators testified that Robinson’s DNA was found on numerous portions of the rifle recovered near Utah Valley University, including the stock, grips, trigger area, bolt and barrel, as well as on ammunition associated with the weapon. An ATF analysis also linked a rotary engraving tool recovered from Robinson’s residence to markings found on cartridge cases, supporting the prosecution’s allegation that ammunition had been engraved before the shooting. At the same time, the forensic evidence was not absolute across the board: investigators could not conclusively determine that the bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Kirk’s autopsy had been fired from the recovered rifle. By the end of the fourth day, however, prosecutors had combined Robinson’s alleged admissions, Twiggs’ account, the handwritten note, surveillance evidence and extensive DNA testimony into their clearest presentation yet of why they believe Robinson was the shooter.







to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75905167Fri, 23 Oct 2026 00:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay four of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing, held July 9, centered on some of the prosecution’s most consequential evidence yet, including a recorded interview with Robinson’s former roommate and romantic partner, Lance Twiggs. In the interview,...

The state also spent a significant portion of the day strengthening the forensic connection between Robinson and the physical evidence. Investigators testified that Robinson’s DNA was found on numerous portions of the rifle recovered near Utah Valley University, including the stock, grips, trigger area, bolt and barrel, as well as on ammunition associated with the weapon. An ATF analysis also linked a rotary engraving tool recovered from Robinson’s residence to markings found on cartridge cases, supporting the prosecution’s allegation that ammunition had been engraved before the shooting. At the same time, the forensic evidence was not absolute across the board: investigators could not conclusively determine that the bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Kirk’s autopsy had been fired from the recovered rifle. By the end of the fourth day, however, prosecutors had combined Robinson’s alleged admissions, Twiggs’ account, the handwritten note, surveillance evidence and extensive DNA testimony into their clearest presentation yet of why they believe Robinson was the shooter.







to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1567breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcript-day-4-part-19-10-22-26--75905172

The state also spent a significant portion of the day strengthening the forensic connection between Robinson and the physical evidence. Investigators testified that Robinson’s DNA was found on numerous portions of the rifle recovered near Utah Valley University, including the stock, grips, trigger area, bolt and barrel, as well as on ammunition associated with the weapon. An ATF analysis also linked a rotary engraving tool recovered from Robinson’s residence to markings found on cartridge cases, supporting the prosecution’s allegation that ammunition had been engraved before the shooting. At the same time, the forensic evidence was not absolute across the board: investigators could not conclusively determine that the bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Kirk’s autopsy had been fired from the recovered rifle. By the end of the fourth day, however, prosecutors had combined Robinson’s alleged admissions, Twiggs’ account, the handwritten note, surveillance evidence and extensive DNA testimony into their clearest presentation yet of why they believe Robinson was the shooter.







to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75905172Thu, 22 Oct 2026 22:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciDay four of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing, held July 9, centered on some of the prosecution’s most consequential evidence yet, including a recorded interview with Robinson’s former roommate and romantic partner, Lance Twiggs. In the interview,...

The state also spent a significant portion of the day strengthening the forensic connection between Robinson and the physical evidence. Investigators testified that Robinson’s DNA was found on numerous portions of the rifle recovered near Utah Valley University, including the stock, grips, trigger area, bolt and barrel, as well as on ammunition associated with the weapon. An ATF analysis also linked a rotary engraving tool recovered from Robinson’s residence to markings found on cartridge cases, supporting the prosecution’s allegation that ammunition had been engraved before the shooting. At the same time, the forensic evidence was not absolute across the board: investigators could not conclusively determine that the bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Kirk’s autopsy had been fired from the recovered rifle. By the end of the fourth day, however, prosecutors had combined Robinson’s alleged admissions, Twiggs’ account, the handwritten note, surveillance evidence and extensive DNA testimony into their clearest presentation yet of why they believe Robinson was the shooter.







to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>672breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/late-2007-documents-show-continued-effort-to-shield-epstein-from-federal-exposure-part-4-10-22-26--75905169
Epstein’s attorneys also argued that the federal government had improperly transformed what they characterized as a state prostitution matter into a much broader federal sex-trafficking investigation. They challenged the use of federal statutes involving interstate communications, enticement and money laundering, accused prosecutors of pushing for harsher punishment than Florida authorities originally contemplated, and objected to provisions of the Non-Prosecution Agreement that protected victims’ ability to pursue civil claims. The defense also resisted efforts to notify victims, involve them in Epstein’s sentencing and facilitate representation for possible lawsuits. Their larger argument was that federal prosecutors had exceeded the proper boundaries of the case and were interpreting the Non-Prosecution Agreement more aggressively than Epstein’s lawyers believed had been agreed upon, while insisting that they were not asking Acosta to cancel the deal itself.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

EFTA00208923.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75905169Thu, 22 Oct 2026 20:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciJeffrey Epstein’s lawyers mounted a broad attack on the federal investigation, arguing that prosecutors had built their case on unreliable witness accounts, distorted police reports and evidence that the defense said had been taken out of context....
Epstein’s attorneys also argued that the federal government had improperly transformed what they characterized as a state prostitution matter into a much broader federal sex-trafficking investigation. They challenged the use of federal statutes involving interstate communications, enticement and money laundering, accused prosecutors of pushing for harsher punishment than Florida authorities originally contemplated, and objected to provisions of the Non-Prosecution Agreement that protected victims’ ability to pursue civil claims. The defense also resisted efforts to notify victims, involve them in Epstein’s sentencing and facilitate representation for possible lawsuits. Their larger argument was that federal prosecutors had exceeded the proper boundaries of the case and were interpreting the Non-Prosecution Agreement more aggressively than Epstein’s lawyers believed had been agreed upon, while insisting that they were not asking Acosta to cancel the deal itself.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

EFTA00208923.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1009epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/late-2007-documents-show-continued-effort-to-shield-epstein-from-federal-exposure-part-3-10-22-26--75905166
Epstein’s attorneys also argued that the federal government had improperly transformed what they characterized as a state prostitution matter into a much broader federal sex-trafficking investigation. They challenged the use of federal statutes involving interstate communications, enticement and money laundering, accused prosecutors of pushing for harsher punishment than Florida authorities originally contemplated, and objected to provisions of the Non-Prosecution Agreement that protected victims’ ability to pursue civil claims. The defense also resisted efforts to notify victims, involve them in Epstein’s sentencing and facilitate representation for possible lawsuits. Their larger argument was that federal prosecutors had exceeded the proper boundaries of the case and were interpreting the Non-Prosecution Agreement more aggressively than Epstein’s lawyers believed had been agreed upon, while insisting that they were not asking Acosta to cancel the deal itself.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

EFTA00208923.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75905166Thu, 22 Oct 2026 18:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciJeffrey Epstein’s lawyers mounted a broad attack on the federal investigation, arguing that prosecutors had built their case on unreliable witness accounts, distorted police reports and evidence that the defense said had been taken out of context....
Epstein’s attorneys also argued that the federal government had improperly transformed what they characterized as a state prostitution matter into a much broader federal sex-trafficking investigation. They challenged the use of federal statutes involving interstate communications, enticement and money laundering, accused prosecutors of pushing for harsher punishment than Florida authorities originally contemplated, and objected to provisions of the Non-Prosecution Agreement that protected victims’ ability to pursue civil claims. The defense also resisted efforts to notify victims, involve them in Epstein’s sentencing and facilitate representation for possible lawsuits. Their larger argument was that federal prosecutors had exceeded the proper boundaries of the case and were interpreting the Non-Prosecution Agreement more aggressively than Epstein’s lawyers believed had been agreed upon, while insisting that they were not asking Acosta to cancel the deal itself.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

EFTA00208923.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>786epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/new-mexico-lawmakers-push-trafficking-reforms-tied-to-epstein-failures-10-22-26--75905168
Dixon also proposed a constitutional Victims’ Rights Amendment that would give trafficking and sexual-abuse survivors greater control over how they participate in criminal cases. The amendment would expand privacy protections, broaden who qualifies as a survivor and allow victims to refuse interviews with defense attorneys; if they agreed to an interview, they could stop it at any time and have a support person present. Torrez framed the proposals as part of a broader effort to correct what he described as some of the weakest protections for sex-crime survivors in the country, particularly as New Mexico continues investigating Epstein’s activities at Zorro Ranch and the institutional failures surrounding him. The larger goal was to make sure the lessons of the Epstein case resulted in permanent changes to state law that would make prosecutions easier, close sex-offender registration loopholes and reduce the chances that survivors would be retraumatized by the justice system itself.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

New Mexico AG, Dem lawmaker announce legislative proposals to empower human trafficking survivors • Source New Mexico

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75905168Thu, 22 Oct 2026 16:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciNew Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez and state Rep. Meredith Dixon announced two legislative proposals aimed at strengthening protections for human trafficking survivors and closing legal gaps exposed in part by the Jeffrey Epstein case. The...
Dixon also proposed a constitutional Victims’ Rights Amendment that would give trafficking and sexual-abuse survivors greater control over how they participate in criminal cases. The amendment would expand privacy protections, broaden who qualifies as a survivor and allow victims to refuse interviews with defense attorneys; if they agreed to an interview, they could stop it at any time and have a support person present. Torrez framed the proposals as part of a broader effort to correct what he described as some of the weakest protections for sex-crime survivors in the country, particularly as New Mexico continues investigating Epstein’s activities at Zorro Ranch and the institutional failures surrounding him. The larger goal was to make sure the lessons of the Epstein case resulted in permanent changes to state law that would make prosecutions easier, close sex-offender registration loopholes and reduce the chances that survivors would be retraumatized by the justice system itself.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

New Mexico AG, Dem lawmaker announce legislative proposals to empower human trafficking survivors • Source New Mexico

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>680epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mike-rogers-faces-scrutiny-over-epstein-comments-and-campaign-donors-10-22-26--75905170
The controversy was intensified by campaign-finance records showing that at least seven people whose names appeared somewhere in the released Epstein records had contributed nearly $4.7 million since 2023 to Rogers, committees associated with him or outside groups supporting his Senate campaigns. More than $4.5 million of that total came from Blackstone CEO Stephen Schwarzman to a super PAC supporting Rogers, meaning the overwhelming majority was not money donated directly to Rogers’ campaign. Other donors included Ronald Lauder, John Catsimatidis, Joseph Baratta, Howard Lorber and John W. Childs. Appearing in Epstein records did not by itself establish criminal conduct or knowledge of Epstein’s crimes, and the nature of the references varied considerably. Politically, however, the combination gave Democrats an obvious line of attack: Rogers had argued for protecting some people named in the Epstein files from public exposure while his political operation was simultaneously benefiting from millions of dollars connected to donors whose names appeared in those same records.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Mike Rogers wanted Epstein plane passengers like Trump kept secret in resurfaced audio - Raw Story

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75905170Thu, 22 Oct 2026 14:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciMichigan Democrats resurfaced audio from a July 2025 interview in which Republican Michigan Senate candidate Mike Rogers argued that the government should be careful about releasing the names of people who appeared in Jeffrey Epstein’s flight records...
The controversy was intensified by campaign-finance records showing that at least seven people whose names appeared somewhere in the released Epstein records had contributed nearly $4.7 million since 2023 to Rogers, committees associated with him or outside groups supporting his Senate campaigns. More than $4.5 million of that total came from Blackstone CEO Stephen Schwarzman to a super PAC supporting Rogers, meaning the overwhelming majority was not money donated directly to Rogers’ campaign. Other donors included Ronald Lauder, John Catsimatidis, Joseph Baratta, Howard Lorber and John W. Childs. Appearing in Epstein records did not by itself establish criminal conduct or knowledge of Epstein’s crimes, and the nature of the references varied considerably. Politically, however, the combination gave Democrats an obvious line of attack: Rogers had argued for protecting some people named in the Epstein files from public exposure while his political operation was simultaneously benefiting from millions of dollars connected to donors whose names appeared in those same records.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Mike Rogers wanted Epstein plane passengers like Trump kept secret in resurfaced audio - Raw Story

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>708epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/fbi-whistleblower-warned-of-epstein-file-risks-before-victims-were-named-10-22-26--75905171
Those warnings proved prescient when DOJ’s January 30, 2026 mass release exposed information the department was legally required to protect. A subsequent review found the unredacted names of at least 43 Epstein victims, including more than two dozen who had been minors when they were abused, with some names appearing repeatedly throughout the searchable database. Other materials reportedly exposed addresses, identifying information and unredacted nude photographs, forcing survivors and their attorneys to scramble to identify documents and ask DOJ to remove or correct them after publication. The controversy was especially damaging to DOJ’s credibility because the department had repeatedly justified delays and redactions as necessary to protect victims, yet ultimately managed to conceal or heavily redact information involving numerous powerful people while failing at the one category of redaction Congress expressly required. Survivors later described harassment, threats and renewed trauma after their identities were exposed, turning what was supposed to be an exercise in Epstein transparency into another episode in which the people abused by Epstein were forced to absorb the consequences of government failure.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Trump's DOJ unmasked Epstein victims after ignoring FBI whistleblower’s urgent alarm - Raw Story

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75905171Thu, 22 Oct 2026 12:21:17 +0000Bobby CapucciThe Justice Department had been warned well in advance that its rushed handling of the Epstein files could expose victims. In July 2025, Sen. Dick Durbin disclosed information provided by a protected FBI whistleblower alleging that Attorney General...
Those warnings proved prescient when DOJ’s January 30, 2026 mass release exposed information the department was legally required to protect. A subsequent review found the unredacted names of at least 43 Epstein victims, including more than two dozen who had been minors when they were abused, with some names appearing repeatedly throughout the searchable database. Other materials reportedly exposed addresses, identifying information and unredacted nude photographs, forcing survivors and their attorneys to scramble to identify documents and ask DOJ to remove or correct them after publication. The controversy was especially damaging to DOJ’s credibility because the department had repeatedly justified delays and redactions as necessary to protect victims, yet ultimately managed to conceal or heavily redact information involving numerous powerful people while failing at the one category of redaction Congress expressly required. Survivors later described harassment, threats and renewed trauma after their identities were exposed, turning what was supposed to be an exercise in Epstein transparency into another episode in which the people abused by Epstein were forced to absorb the consequences of government failure.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Trump's DOJ unmasked Epstein victims after ignoring FBI whistleblower’s urgent alarm - Raw Story

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>890epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-chad-daybell-trial-part-17-10-22-26--75902844
The afternoon focused heavily on Melani’s husband, Ian Pawlowski, and secret recordings he made while cooperating with the FBI in late 2019. Jurors heard portions of conversations involving Chad, Lori, Melani, Alex Cox and Zulema Pastenes in which Chad and Lori portrayed certain law-enforcement officers as “dark,” discussed spiritual attacks and talked about their belief that they were leaders in gathering the 144,000. Chad was also heard giving Ian and Melani an unusual blessing in which he spoke about portals, spiritual cords, cleansing the earth through earthquakes and their supposed role in a larger divine mission. Ian testified that Chad and Lori had urged him and Melani to get away from law enforcement and that, despite the growing search for JJ and Tylee, neither Chad nor Lori ever told him where the children were or did anything to help locate them. Day seventeen therefore connected three major parts of the prosecution’s case at once: the physical reality of JJ’s burial on Chad’s property, the belief system Chad promoted within the group and recorded conversations showing how Chad and Lori responded as police closed in.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75902844Thu, 22 Oct 2026 10:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay seventeen of Chad Daybell’s trial began with FBI Special Agent Steve Daniels finishing his testimony about the June 2020 search of Chad’s property and the recovery of JJ Vallow’s remains. Daniels walked jurors through the burial site near the pond...
The afternoon focused heavily on Melani’s husband, Ian Pawlowski, and secret recordings he made while cooperating with the FBI in late 2019. Jurors heard portions of conversations involving Chad, Lori, Melani, Alex Cox and Zulema Pastenes in which Chad and Lori portrayed certain law-enforcement officers as “dark,” discussed spiritual attacks and talked about their belief that they were leaders in gathering the 144,000. Chad was also heard giving Ian and Melani an unusual blessing in which he spoke about portals, spiritual cords, cleansing the earth through earthquakes and their supposed role in a larger divine mission. Ian testified that Chad and Lori had urged him and Melani to get away from law enforcement and that, despite the growing search for JJ and Tylee, neither Chad nor Lori ever told him where the children were or did anything to help locate them. Day seventeen therefore connected three major parts of the prosecution’s case at once: the physical reality of JJ’s burial on Chad’s property, the belief system Chad promoted within the group and recorded conversations showing how Chad and Lori responded as police closed in.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3235chaddaybell,chaddaybelltrial,courtroomcoverage,daybellcase,daybellmurders,doomsdaycouple,doomsdayprophet,idahomurders,idahotruecrime,jjandtylee,justiceforjj,justicefortammy,justicefortylee,lorivallow,lorivallowdaybell,murdertrial,tammydaybell,truecrime,truecrimecommunity,truecrimepodcasttruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-chad-daybell-trial-part-16-10-22-26--75902842
FBI Special Agent Steve Daniels then took jurors directly into the June 9, 2020 excavation of Chad’s Salem property. Daniels described how investigators used cellphone-location data, Chad’s text messages about a pet cemetery and knowledge of a fire pit to identify areas that needed to be searched. He testified that investigators recovered pieces of bone, burned flesh, fabric, a chain and a silver charm believed to have belonged to Tylee from the fire-pit area, and jurors were shown the charm alongside a photograph of Tylee wearing a similar necklace. Daniels described the painstaking excavation of Tylee’s badly burned and dismembered remains and explained that investigators later seized a dirty shovel and pickaxe from the property because they could have been used in the burial or destruction of evidence. Day sixteen gave jurors some of the most tangible evidence of the trial, moving beyond messages and testimony and placing physical objects from Chad’s own property directly in front of them as prosecutors continued tying him to the locations where JJ and Tylee were found.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75902842Thu, 22 Oct 2026 08:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay sixteen of Chad Daybell’s trial focused on the search for JJ Vallow and Tylee Ryan and the physical evidence recovered from Chad’s property. Retired Rexburg Police Detective David Stubbs continued describing the November 2019 welfare check for JJ...
FBI Special Agent Steve Daniels then took jurors directly into the June 9, 2020 excavation of Chad’s Salem property. Daniels described how investigators used cellphone-location data, Chad’s text messages about a pet cemetery and knowledge of a fire pit to identify areas that needed to be searched. He testified that investigators recovered pieces of bone, burned flesh, fabric, a chain and a silver charm believed to have belonged to Tylee from the fire-pit area, and jurors were shown the charm alongside a photograph of Tylee wearing a similar necklace. Daniels described the painstaking excavation of Tylee’s badly burned and dismembered remains and explained that investigators later seized a dirty shovel and pickaxe from the property because they could have been used in the burial or destruction of evidence. Day sixteen gave jurors some of the most tangible evidence of the trial, moving beyond messages and testimony and placing physical objects from Chad’s own property directly in front of them as prosecutors continued tying him to the locations where JJ and Tylee were found.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1814chaddaybell,chaddaybelltrial,courtroomcoverage,daybellcase,daybellmurders,doomsdaycouple,doomsdayprophet,idahomurders,idahotruecrime,jjandtylee,justiceforjj,justicefortammy,justicefortylee,lorivallow,lorivallowdaybell,murdertrial,tammydaybell,truecrime,truecrimecommunity,truecrimepodcasttruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-chad-daybell-trial-part-15-10-21-26--75902843
Chad’s sister-in-law Heather Daybell then gave some of the day’s most damaging testimony, describing concerns she had held for years about Chad’s increasingly extreme religious teachings and his predictions about earthquakes, visions and future events. Heather said Chad’s explanation of Tammy’s death had sounded “scripted” and that he later gave her a different explanation, claiming Tammy had died from a pulmonary embolism related to weight gain. She also said Chad seemed able to switch his grief on and off at Tammy’s funeral and had insisted on holding the funeral quickly despite family members asking him to wait. Later, retired Rexburg Police Officer David Stubbs testified about surveillance of Chad and Lori and the November 26, 2019 welfare check for JJ. Jurors watched body-camera footage showing Lori falsely claiming JJ was staying with Melanie Gibb, minimizing her relationship with Chad by calling him a friend of her brother, and offering a series of explanations about why family members were trying to find her. Stubbs testified that officers could not verify JJ’s whereabouts, could not confirm Lori’s claims about Tylee attending BYU-Idaho, and ultimately obtained search warrants for the apartments belonging to Lori, Alex Cox and Melani Boudreaux. Day fifteen therefore tied together family concerns about Chad’s beliefs and behavior with the first concrete police efforts to locate JJ, showing jurors how the missing-children investigation began unraveling the story Chad and Lori had been telling.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75902843Thu, 22 Oct 2026 06:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciDay fifteen of Chad Daybell’s trial centered on testimony from people close to both Chad and JJ Vallow, beginning with JJ’s grandmother Kay Woodcock. Woodcock described becoming increasingly alarmed after Charles Vallow’s death as Lori stopped...
Chad’s sister-in-law Heather Daybell then gave some of the day’s most damaging testimony, describing concerns she had held for years about Chad’s increasingly extreme religious teachings and his predictions about earthquakes, visions and future events. Heather said Chad’s explanation of Tammy’s death had sounded “scripted” and that he later gave her a different explanation, claiming Tammy had died from a pulmonary embolism related to weight gain. She also said Chad seemed able to switch his grief on and off at Tammy’s funeral and had insisted on holding the funeral quickly despite family members asking him to wait. Later, retired Rexburg Police Officer David Stubbs testified about surveillance of Chad and Lori and the November 26, 2019 welfare check for JJ. Jurors watched body-camera footage showing Lori falsely claiming JJ was staying with Melanie Gibb, minimizing her relationship with Chad by calling him a friend of her brother, and offering a series of explanations about why family members were trying to find her. Stubbs testified that officers could not verify JJ’s whereabouts, could not confirm Lori’s claims about Tylee attending BYU-Idaho, and ultimately obtained search warrants for the apartments belonging to Lori, Alex Cox and Melani Boudreaux. Day fifteen therefore tied together family concerns about Chad’s beliefs and behavior with the first concrete police efforts to locate JJ, showing jurors how the missing-children investigation began unraveling the story Chad and Lori had been telling.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3109chaddaybell,chaddaybelltrial,courtroomcoverage,daybellcase,daybellmurders,doomsdaycouple,doomsdayprophet,idahomurders,idahotruecrime,jjandtylee,justiceforjj,justicefortammy,justicefortylee,lorivallow,lorivallowdaybell,murdertrial,tammydaybell,truecrime,truecrimecommunity,truecrimepodcasttruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-rebecca-scofield-files-a-lawsuit-against-a-tarot-card-reader-from-tik-tok--75903385
Guillard did not back away from the accusations after being sued. She represented herself for much of the litigation, insisted that her claims were “substantially true,” and told the court that she had used her “spiritual brain,” intuition and investigative abilities to determine what had happened. The federal court later rejected her counterclaims and, in 2024, granted Scofield partial summary judgment on liability while allowing her to pursue punitive damages, finding that the evidence established the falsity of the accusations and that a jury could consider the harm caused by Guillard’s repeated publications. The case ultimately became a stark example of the misinformation that exploded around the Moscow murders before an arrest was even made, with an uninvolved university professor forced into years of litigation after being publicly accused of murder on the basis of tarot readings rather than evidence.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75903385Thu, 22 Oct 2026 04:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciUniversity of Idaho professor Rebecca Scofield filed a federal defamation lawsuit in December 2022 against Ashley Guillard, a self-described psychic and tarot-card reader who had posted scores of videos accusing Scofield of involvement in the murders...
Guillard did not back away from the accusations after being sued. She represented herself for much of the litigation, insisted that her claims were “substantially true,” and told the court that she had used her “spiritual brain,” intuition and investigative abilities to determine what had happened. The federal court later rejected her counterclaims and, in 2024, granted Scofield partial summary judgment on liability while allowing her to pursue punitive damages, finding that the evidence established the falsity of the accusations and that a jury could consider the harm caused by Guillard’s repeated publications. The case ultimately became a stark example of the misinformation that exploded around the Moscow murders before an arrest was even made, with an uninvolved university professor forced into years of litigation after being publicly accused of murder on the basis of tarot readings rather than evidence.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1057falsefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-inside-the-courtroom-of-judge-steven-hippler--75903384



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

New Idaho student murders Judge Steven Hippler takes Bryan Kohberger case | Fox News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75903384Thu, 22 Oct 2026 02:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciJudge Steven J. Hippler serves as the Administrative District Judge for Idaho's Fourth Judicial District, overseeing Ada, Boise, Elmore, and Valley Counties. Appointed in 2014, he is known for handling both high-profile criminal cases and complex...



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

New Idaho student murders Judge Steven Hippler takes Bryan Kohberger case | Fox News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>965bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcript-day-4-part-19-10-21-26--75901655

The state also spent a significant portion of the day strengthening the forensic connection between Robinson and the physical evidence. Investigators testified that Robinson’s DNA was found on numerous portions of the rifle recovered near Utah Valley University, including the stock, grips, trigger area, bolt and barrel, as well as on ammunition associated with the weapon. An ATF analysis also linked a rotary engraving tool recovered from Robinson’s residence to markings found on cartridge cases, supporting the prosecution’s allegation that ammunition had been engraved before the shooting. At the same time, the forensic evidence was not absolute across the board: investigators could not conclusively determine that the bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Kirk’s autopsy had been fired from the recovered rifle. By the end of the fourth day, however, prosecutors had combined Robinson’s alleged admissions, Twiggs’ account, the handwritten note, surveillance evidence and extensive DNA testimony into their clearest presentation yet of why they believe Robinson was the shooter.







to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75901655Thu, 22 Oct 2026 00:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciDay four of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing, held July 9, centered on some of the prosecution’s most consequential evidence yet, including a recorded interview with Robinson’s former roommate and romantic partner, Lance Twiggs. In the interview,...

The state also spent a significant portion of the day strengthening the forensic connection between Robinson and the physical evidence. Investigators testified that Robinson’s DNA was found on numerous portions of the rifle recovered near Utah Valley University, including the stock, grips, trigger area, bolt and barrel, as well as on ammunition associated with the weapon. An ATF analysis also linked a rotary engraving tool recovered from Robinson’s residence to markings found on cartridge cases, supporting the prosecution’s allegation that ammunition had been engraved before the shooting. At the same time, the forensic evidence was not absolute across the board: investigators could not conclusively determine that the bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Kirk’s autopsy had been fired from the recovered rifle. By the end of the fourth day, however, prosecutors had combined Robinson’s alleged admissions, Twiggs’ account, the handwritten note, surveillance evidence and extensive DNA testimony into their clearest presentation yet of why they believe Robinson was the shooter.







to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>672breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcript-day-4-part-18-10-21-26--75901656

The state also spent a significant portion of the day strengthening the forensic connection between Robinson and the physical evidence. Investigators testified that Robinson’s DNA was found on numerous portions of the rifle recovered near Utah Valley University, including the stock, grips, trigger area, bolt and barrel, as well as on ammunition associated with the weapon. An ATF analysis also linked a rotary engraving tool recovered from Robinson’s residence to markings found on cartridge cases, supporting the prosecution’s allegation that ammunition had been engraved before the shooting. At the same time, the forensic evidence was not absolute across the board: investigators could not conclusively determine that the bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Kirk’s autopsy had been fired from the recovered rifle. By the end of the fourth day, however, prosecutors had combined Robinson’s alleged admissions, Twiggs’ account, the handwritten note, surveillance evidence and extensive DNA testimony into their clearest presentation yet of why they believe Robinson was the shooter.







to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75901656Wed, 21 Oct 2026 22:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay four of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing, held July 9, centered on some of the prosecution’s most consequential evidence yet, including a recorded interview with Robinson’s former roommate and romantic partner, Lance Twiggs. In the interview,...

The state also spent a significant portion of the day strengthening the forensic connection between Robinson and the physical evidence. Investigators testified that Robinson’s DNA was found on numerous portions of the rifle recovered near Utah Valley University, including the stock, grips, trigger area, bolt and barrel, as well as on ammunition associated with the weapon. An ATF analysis also linked a rotary engraving tool recovered from Robinson’s residence to markings found on cartridge cases, supporting the prosecution’s allegation that ammunition had been engraved before the shooting. At the same time, the forensic evidence was not absolute across the board: investigators could not conclusively determine that the bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Kirk’s autopsy had been fired from the recovered rifle. By the end of the fourth day, however, prosecutors had combined Robinson’s alleged admissions, Twiggs’ account, the handwritten note, surveillance evidence and extensive DNA testimony into their clearest presentation yet of why they believe Robinson was the shooter.







to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>758breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/late-2007-documents-show-continued-effort-to-shield-epstein-from-federal-exposure-part-2-10-21-26--75900048
Epstein’s attorneys also argued that the federal government had improperly transformed what they characterized as a state prostitution matter into a much broader federal sex-trafficking investigation. They challenged the use of federal statutes involving interstate communications, enticement and money laundering, accused prosecutors of pushing for harsher punishment than Florida authorities originally contemplated, and objected to provisions of the Non-Prosecution Agreement that protected victims’ ability to pursue civil claims. The defense also resisted efforts to notify victims, involve them in Epstein’s sentencing and facilitate representation for possible lawsuits. Their larger argument was that federal prosecutors had exceeded the proper boundaries of the case and were interpreting the Non-Prosecution Agreement more aggressively than Epstein’s lawyers believed had been agreed upon, while insisting that they were not asking Acosta to cancel the deal itself.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

EFTA00208923.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75900048Wed, 21 Oct 2026 20:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciJeffrey Epstein’s lawyers mounted a broad attack on the federal investigation, arguing that prosecutors had built their case on unreliable witness accounts, distorted police reports and evidence that the defense said had been taken out of context....
Epstein’s attorneys also argued that the federal government had improperly transformed what they characterized as a state prostitution matter into a much broader federal sex-trafficking investigation. They challenged the use of federal statutes involving interstate communications, enticement and money laundering, accused prosecutors of pushing for harsher punishment than Florida authorities originally contemplated, and objected to provisions of the Non-Prosecution Agreement that protected victims’ ability to pursue civil claims. The defense also resisted efforts to notify victims, involve them in Epstein’s sentencing and facilitate representation for possible lawsuits. Their larger argument was that federal prosecutors had exceeded the proper boundaries of the case and were interpreting the Non-Prosecution Agreement more aggressively than Epstein’s lawyers believed had been agreed upon, while insisting that they were not asking Acosta to cancel the deal itself.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

EFTA00208923.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>664epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/late-2007-documents-show-continued-effort-to-shield-epstein-from-federal-exposure-part-1-10-21-26--75900045
Epstein’s attorneys also argued that the federal government had improperly transformed what they characterized as a state prostitution matter into a much broader federal sex-trafficking investigation. They challenged the use of federal statutes involving interstate communications, enticement and money laundering, accused prosecutors of pushing for harsher punishment than Florida authorities originally contemplated, and objected to provisions of the Non-Prosecution Agreement that protected victims’ ability to pursue civil claims. The defense also resisted efforts to notify victims, involve them in Epstein’s sentencing and facilitate representation for possible lawsuits. Their larger argument was that federal prosecutors had exceeded the proper boundaries of the case and were interpreting the Non-Prosecution Agreement more aggressively than Epstein’s lawyers believed had been agreed upon, while insisting that they were not asking Acosta to cancel the deal itself.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

EFTA00208923.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75900045Wed, 21 Oct 2026 18:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJeffrey Epstein’s lawyers mounted a broad attack on the federal investigation, arguing that prosecutors had built their case on unreliable witness accounts, distorted police reports and evidence that the defense said had been taken out of context....
Epstein’s attorneys also argued that the federal government had improperly transformed what they characterized as a state prostitution matter into a much broader federal sex-trafficking investigation. They challenged the use of federal statutes involving interstate communications, enticement and money laundering, accused prosecutors of pushing for harsher punishment than Florida authorities originally contemplated, and objected to provisions of the Non-Prosecution Agreement that protected victims’ ability to pursue civil claims. The defense also resisted efforts to notify victims, involve them in Epstein’s sentencing and facilitate representation for possible lawsuits. Their larger argument was that federal prosecutors had exceeded the proper boundaries of the case and were interpreting the Non-Prosecution Agreement more aggressively than Epstein’s lawyers believed had been agreed upon, while insisting that they were not asking Acosta to cancel the deal itself.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

EFTA00208923.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>891epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/epstein-the-midterms-and-the-politics-of-accountability-part-2-10-21-26--75900047
The real test, however, will come after the election, when the politicians who used Epstein’s name and the suffering of survivors are expected to turn campaign rhetoric into action. Candidates who promised transparency, hearings, subpoenas, document releases, and accountability will no longer be able to hide behind advertisements and speeches once they hold actual power. If they ran beside survivors, invoked Virginia Giuffre, accused opponents of protecting powerful people, or promised to force the truth into the open, voters should demand that they follow through with aggressive oversight, enforcement of disclosure laws, scrutiny of remaining redactions, and serious examination of financial and institutional enablers. Using survivors as campaign props and then abandoning the issue after Election Day would confirm the very corruption and cynicism these candidates claimed to oppose. The politicians who lit this fire to win votes will be expected to stand in it once they take office, because after the talking is over, the only thing that matters is whether they actually deliver.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75900047Wed, 21 Oct 2026 16:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciJeffrey Epstein has become a major factor in the closing stretch of the 2026 midterm elections, with his name appearing in campaign ads, debates, donor attacks, and arguments over congressional transparency in races across the country. Senate contests...
The real test, however, will come after the election, when the politicians who used Epstein’s name and the suffering of survivors are expected to turn campaign rhetoric into action. Candidates who promised transparency, hearings, subpoenas, document releases, and accountability will no longer be able to hide behind advertisements and speeches once they hold actual power. If they ran beside survivors, invoked Virginia Giuffre, accused opponents of protecting powerful people, or promised to force the truth into the open, voters should demand that they follow through with aggressive oversight, enforcement of disclosure laws, scrutiny of remaining redactions, and serious examination of financial and institutional enablers. Using survivors as campaign props and then abandoning the issue after Election Day would confirm the very corruption and cynicism these candidates claimed to oppose. The politicians who lit this fire to win votes will be expected to stand in it once they take office, because after the talking is over, the only thing that matters is whether they actually deliver.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1202epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/epstein-the-midterms-and-the-politics-of-accountability-part-1-10-21-26--75900046
The real test, however, will come after the election, when the politicians who used Epstein’s name and the suffering of survivors are expected to turn campaign rhetoric into action. Candidates who promised transparency, hearings, subpoenas, document releases, and accountability will no longer be able to hide behind advertisements and speeches once they hold actual power. If they ran beside survivors, invoked Virginia Giuffre, accused opponents of protecting powerful people, or promised to force the truth into the open, voters should demand that they follow through with aggressive oversight, enforcement of disclosure laws, scrutiny of remaining redactions, and serious examination of financial and institutional enablers. Using survivors as campaign props and then abandoning the issue after Election Day would confirm the very corruption and cynicism these candidates claimed to oppose. The politicians who lit this fire to win votes will be expected to stand in it once they take office, because after the talking is over, the only thing that matters is whether they actually deliver.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75900046Wed, 21 Oct 2026 14:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJeffrey Epstein has become a major factor in the closing stretch of the 2026 midterm elections, with his name appearing in campaign ads, debates, donor attacks, and arguments over congressional transparency in races across the country. Senate contests...
The real test, however, will come after the election, when the politicians who used Epstein’s name and the suffering of survivors are expected to turn campaign rhetoric into action. Candidates who promised transparency, hearings, subpoenas, document releases, and accountability will no longer be able to hide behind advertisements and speeches once they hold actual power. If they ran beside survivors, invoked Virginia Giuffre, accused opponents of protecting powerful people, or promised to force the truth into the open, voters should demand that they follow through with aggressive oversight, enforcement of disclosure laws, scrutiny of remaining redactions, and serious examination of financial and institutional enablers. Using survivors as campaign props and then abandoning the issue after Election Day would confirm the very corruption and cynicism these candidates claimed to oppose. The politicians who lit this fire to win votes will be expected to stand in it once they take office, because after the talking is over, the only thing that matters is whether they actually deliver.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1033epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/house-democrats-eye-prince-andrew-testimony-in-epstein-investigation-10-21-26--75898432
The renewed pressure came as Andrew received a significant legal victory in Britain, where police acknowledged that search warrants used to raid his homes at Sandringham and Windsor had been unlawfully issued. Andrew had been arrested in February on suspicion of misconduct in public office tied to allegations that he shared official information with Epstein while serving as a UK trade envoy, allegations he denied. Although the warrants were quashed, the British investigation remained active, and police were still fighting to retain evidence seized during the searches. Epstein survivor Lara Blume McGee said Andrew should be concerned if Congress obtained stronger subpoena authority, while attorney Spencer Kuvin, who has represented Epstein survivors, said he did not believe scrutiny of Andrew would end anytime soon. 














to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

Andrew facing new order to reveal Epstein links as he sweats over US elections which could trigger fresh probe

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75898432Wed, 21 Oct 2026 12:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciAndrew Mountbatten-Windsor could face a fresh demand to testify before the U.S. House Oversight Committee if Democrats take control of the House in the upcoming midterm elections. Rep. Suhas Subramanyam, a member of the committee, said Democrats...
The renewed pressure came as Andrew received a significant legal victory in Britain, where police acknowledged that search warrants used to raid his homes at Sandringham and Windsor had been unlawfully issued. Andrew had been arrested in February on suspicion of misconduct in public office tied to allegations that he shared official information with Epstein while serving as a UK trade envoy, allegations he denied. Although the warrants were quashed, the British investigation remained active, and police were still fighting to retain evidence seized during the searches. Epstein survivor Lara Blume McGee said Andrew should be concerned if Congress obtained stronger subpoena authority, while attorney Spencer Kuvin, who has represented Epstein survivors, said he did not believe scrutiny of Andrew would end anytime soon. 














to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

Andrew facing new order to reveal Epstein links as he sweats over US elections which could trigger fresh probe

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>672epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-chad-daybell-trial-part-13-14-10-21-26--75883597
Day fourteen brought some of the strongest medical testimony of the trial when former Utah Chief Medical Examiner Dr. Erik Christensen told jurors that Tammy Daybell died from asphyxia and that her manner of death was homicide. Christensen testified that Tammy’s heart and other major organs were generally normal, toxicology did not reveal a substance capable of explaining her death, and he found no evidence supporting seizures or a fatal heart arrhythmia. He also documented multiple bruises on Tammy’s arms and chest that had occurred shortly before her death and said those injuries could have been consistent with someone restraining her while she was suffocated. Neighbors Alice and Todd Gilbert then testified that Chad had predicted months earlier that Tammy’s “life mission” would end before her 50th birthday, appeared unusually businesslike after her death, and told them only days after the funeral that he had found the woman he intended to marry. They also recalled Chad saying Lori had a daughter who had recently died even though Tylee was still officially missing, and said Chad later asked them to put up their home to help bond Lori out of jail. Tammy’s co-worker Janice Olson reinforced testimony that Tammy had been active and healthy immediately before her death, while insurance broker Taylor Ballard testified that Chad discussed adding a future wife to insurance coverage shortly after Tammy died and later raised concerns that Tammy’s life-insurance payout might have been fraudulent.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75883597Wed, 21 Oct 2026 10:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay thirteen of Chad Daybell’s trial focused heavily on cellphone-location evidence and the increasingly inconsistent accounts Chad gave about Tammy Daybell’s death. FBI cellular analyst Nick Ballance walked jurors through the movements of Alex Cox’s...
Day fourteen brought some of the strongest medical testimony of the trial when former Utah Chief Medical Examiner Dr. Erik Christensen told jurors that Tammy Daybell died from asphyxia and that her manner of death was homicide. Christensen testified that Tammy’s heart and other major organs were generally normal, toxicology did not reveal a substance capable of explaining her death, and he found no evidence supporting seizures or a fatal heart arrhythmia. He also documented multiple bruises on Tammy’s arms and chest that had occurred shortly before her death and said those injuries could have been consistent with someone restraining her while she was suffocated. Neighbors Alice and Todd Gilbert then testified that Chad had predicted months earlier that Tammy’s “life mission” would end before her 50th birthday, appeared unusually businesslike after her death, and told them only days after the funeral that he had found the woman he intended to marry. They also recalled Chad saying Lori had a daughter who had recently died even though Tylee was still officially missing, and said Chad later asked them to put up their home to help bond Lori out of jail. Tammy’s co-worker Janice Olson reinforced testimony that Tammy had been active and healthy immediately before her death, while insurance broker Taylor Ballard testified that Chad discussed adding a future wife to insurance coverage shortly after Tammy died and later raised concerns that Tammy’s life-insurance payout might have been fraudulent.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>5249chaddaybell,chaddaybelltrial,courtroomcoverage,daybellcase,daybellmurders,doomsdaycouple,doomsdayprophet,idahomurders,idahotruecrime,jjandtylee,justiceforjj,justicefortammy,justicefortylee,lorivallow,lorivallowdaybell,murdertrial,tammydaybell,truecrime,truecrimecommunity,truecrimepodcasttruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-chad-daybell-trial-part-11-12-10-21-26--75883596
Day twelve shifted toward Tammy’s sudden death and Chad’s conduct immediately afterward. Former neighbor and funeral director Steven Schultz testified that Chad declined an autopsy, pushed to hold Tammy’s funeral quickly and said he did not want to “drag this out,” leaving Schultz uneasy enough to privately tell a relative that something did not sit right. Other friends and neighbors described Tammy’s death as shocking and unexpected, with several testifying that she had appeared healthy and active beforehand. Realtor Ron Arnold said Chad later discussed placing another home on his property and, after JJ and Tylee had already been reported missing, assured Arnold that the children were fine and that everything would eventually work out. Arnold also said the construction Chad discussed would have required excavation on the same property where the children’s remains were later found. Principal Richard Garner testified that Tammy had been energetic, busy and physically active at school, directly undercutting the defense suggestion that she had been in declining health. The day reinforced the prosecution’s argument that Tammy’s death did not look natural to people who knew her and that Chad’s words and actions afterward raised questions that only grew once the children were discovered buried on his land.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75883596Wed, 21 Oct 2026 08:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciDay eleven of Chad Daybell’s trial focused heavily on the attempted shooting of Tammy Daybell, Alex Cox’s activity in the days surrounding it and additional evidence showing that Chad’s “light” and “dark” rating system extended well beyond Lori Vallow...
Day twelve shifted toward Tammy’s sudden death and Chad’s conduct immediately afterward. Former neighbor and funeral director Steven Schultz testified that Chad declined an autopsy, pushed to hold Tammy’s funeral quickly and said he did not want to “drag this out,” leaving Schultz uneasy enough to privately tell a relative that something did not sit right. Other friends and neighbors described Tammy’s death as shocking and unexpected, with several testifying that she had appeared healthy and active beforehand. Realtor Ron Arnold said Chad later discussed placing another home on his property and, after JJ and Tylee had already been reported missing, assured Arnold that the children were fine and that everything would eventually work out. Arnold also said the construction Chad discussed would have required excavation on the same property where the children’s remains were later found. Principal Richard Garner testified that Tammy had been energetic, busy and physically active at school, directly undercutting the defense suggestion that she had been in declining health. The day reinforced the prosecution’s argument that Tammy’s death did not look natural to people who knew her and that Chad’s words and actions afterward raised questions that only grew once the children were discovered buried on his land.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3799chaddaybell,chaddaybelltrial,courtroomcoverage,daybellcase,daybellmurders,doomsdaycouple,doomsdayprophet,idahomurders,idahotruecrime,jjandtylee,justiceforjj,justicefortammy,justicefortylee,lorivallow,lorivallowdaybell,murdertrial,tammydaybell,truecrime,truecrimecommunity,truecrimepodcasttruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-chad-daybell-trial-part-9-10-10-20-21-26--75883595
Day ten concentrated almost entirely on whether Tammy had actually been in poor health before her death and how her death was originally classified. Fremont County Coroner Brenda Dye testified that she initially attributed Tammy’s death to pulmonary edema caused by a cardiac event based largely on what Chad told her about fainting spells, low blood pressure, coughing and Tammy’s preference for natural remedies. After Tammy’s body was exhumed, however, Dye said the autopsy changed her assessment: Tammy’s organs were generally healthy, she had a deep bruise on her arm, her stomach contents raised questions about Chad’s claim that she had vomited, and her lungs still contained substantial pink foam. Dye ultimately amended the cause of death to homicide by asphyxiation through suffocation and acknowledged that, had she known more about the surrounding investigations at the time, she would have ordered an autopsy immediately. Tammy’s friends and co-workers then testified that she had been active, healthy and capable of keeping up with strenuous exercise classes shortly before she died, directly challenging the picture of declining health Chad had presented. Detective Bruce Mattingly added that Tammy’s Fitbit data showed no significant slowdown in her activity and testified that Chad received roughly $430,000 from Tammy’s life-insurance policies, while also noting that Chad’s children had not voluntarily provided investigators with information about their mother’s health.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75883595Wed, 21 Oct 2026 06:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciDay nine of Chad Daybell’s trial shifted heavily toward the events surrounding Tammy Daybell and the attempted shooting of Brandon Boudreaux. Brandon testified that someone driving Tylee Ryan’s Jeep fired at him outside his Arizona home on October 2,...
Day ten concentrated almost entirely on whether Tammy had actually been in poor health before her death and how her death was originally classified. Fremont County Coroner Brenda Dye testified that she initially attributed Tammy’s death to pulmonary edema caused by a cardiac event based largely on what Chad told her about fainting spells, low blood pressure, coughing and Tammy’s preference for natural remedies. After Tammy’s body was exhumed, however, Dye said the autopsy changed her assessment: Tammy’s organs were generally healthy, she had a deep bruise on her arm, her stomach contents raised questions about Chad’s claim that she had vomited, and her lungs still contained substantial pink foam. Dye ultimately amended the cause of death to homicide by asphyxiation through suffocation and acknowledged that, had she known more about the surrounding investigations at the time, she would have ordered an autopsy immediately. Tammy’s friends and co-workers then testified that she had been active, healthy and capable of keeping up with strenuous exercise classes shortly before she died, directly challenging the picture of declining health Chad had presented. Detective Bruce Mattingly added that Tammy’s Fitbit data showed no significant slowdown in her activity and testified that Chad received roughly $430,000 from Tammy’s life-insurance policies, while also noting that Chad’s children had not voluntarily provided investigators with information about their mother’s health.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3937chaddaybell,chaddaybelltrial,courtroomcoverage,daybellcase,daybellmurders,doomsdaycouple,doomsdayprophet,idahomurders,idahotruecrime,jjandtylee,justiceforjj,justicefortammy,justicefortylee,lorivallow,lorivallowdaybell,murdertrial,tammydaybell,truecrime,truecrimecommunity,truecrimepodcasttruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-united-states-senate-rejects-the-idea-of-a-maxwell-pardon--75883734
Although the resolution cannot legally prevent a president from pardoning Maxwell, it increased the political pressure surrounding the issue after President Trump repeatedly declined to categorically rule clemency in or out. White House officials maintained that a pardon was not under consideration, while Todd Blanche, who previously interviewed Maxwell and supervised the release of Epstein-related records, said he would not recommend one. Maxwell recently invoked the Fifth Amendment during a House Oversight Committee deposition, and her attorney claimed she remained willing to offer testimony defending Trump and former President Bill Clinton against allegations of wrongdoing connected to Epstein.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Senate unanimously agrees to oppose pardon for Ghislaine Maxwell

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75883734Wed, 21 Oct 2026 04:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciThe Senate unanimously adopted a nonbinding resolution opposing any presidential pardon, commutation or other form of clemency for Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime associate who is serving a 20-year federal sentence following her 2021...
Although the resolution cannot legally prevent a president from pardoning Maxwell, it increased the political pressure surrounding the issue after President Trump repeatedly declined to categorically rule clemency in or out. White House officials maintained that a pardon was not under consideration, while Todd Blanche, who previously interviewed Maxwell and supervised the release of Epstein-related records, said he would not recommend one. Maxwell recently invoked the Fifth Amendment during a House Oversight Committee deposition, and her attorney claimed she remained willing to offer testimony defending Trump and former President Bill Clinton against allegations of wrongdoing connected to Epstein.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Senate unanimously agrees to oppose pardon for Ghislaine Maxwell

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>623epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/jeffrey-epstein-s-alleged-plot-to-blackmail-sarah-ferguson--75883733
Ferguson’s financial problems appeared to make her particularly vulnerable to that pressure. She repeatedly sought money, employment opportunities and business support from Epstein even after his 2008 conviction, while he remained involved in ventures connected to her and controlled internet domains associated with one of her projects. When Ferguson sought the return of those domains, Epstein’s lawyer reportedly treated the matter as part of a negotiation tied to her public support for him. Although the available evidence did not conclusively establish criminal blackmail, it showed Epstein attempting to exploit financial dependency and personal loyalty to secure favorable statements from someone whose public condemnation threatened his efforts to rehabilitate his reputation.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Inside Epstein’s plot to ‘blackmail’ Sarah Ferguson over paedophile comments

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75883733Wed, 21 Oct 2026 02:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciJeffrey Epstein allegedly attempted to use his financial leverage over Sarah Ferguson to pressure her into publicly repairing his reputation after she condemned her association with him. Ferguson had described accepting £15,000 from Epstein as a...
Ferguson’s financial problems appeared to make her particularly vulnerable to that pressure. She repeatedly sought money, employment opportunities and business support from Epstein even after his 2008 conviction, while he remained involved in ventures connected to her and controlled internet domains associated with one of her projects. When Ferguson sought the return of those domains, Epstein’s lawyer reportedly treated the matter as part of a negotiation tied to her public support for him. Although the available evidence did not conclusively establish criminal blackmail, it showed Epstein attempting to exploit financial dependency and personal loyalty to secure favorable statements from someone whose public condemnation threatened his efforts to rehabilitate his reputation.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Inside Epstein’s plot to ‘blackmail’ Sarah Ferguson over paedophile comments

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>701epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcript-day-4-part-17-10-20-26--75878510

The state also spent a significant portion of the day strengthening the forensic connection between Robinson and the physical evidence. Investigators testified that Robinson’s DNA was found on numerous portions of the rifle recovered near Utah Valley University, including the stock, grips, trigger area, bolt and barrel, as well as on ammunition associated with the weapon. An ATF analysis also linked a rotary engraving tool recovered from Robinson’s residence to markings found on cartridge cases, supporting the prosecution’s allegation that ammunition had been engraved before the shooting. At the same time, the forensic evidence was not absolute across the board: investigators could not conclusively determine that the bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Kirk’s autopsy had been fired from the recovered rifle. By the end of the fourth day, however, prosecutors had combined Robinson’s alleged admissions, Twiggs’ account, the handwritten note, surveillance evidence and extensive DNA testimony into their clearest presentation yet of why they believe Robinson was the shooter.







to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75878510Wed, 21 Oct 2026 00:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay four of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing, held July 9, centered on some of the prosecution’s most consequential evidence yet, including a recorded interview with Robinson’s former roommate and romantic partner, Lance Twiggs. In the interview,...

The state also spent a significant portion of the day strengthening the forensic connection between Robinson and the physical evidence. Investigators testified that Robinson’s DNA was found on numerous portions of the rifle recovered near Utah Valley University, including the stock, grips, trigger area, bolt and barrel, as well as on ammunition associated with the weapon. An ATF analysis also linked a rotary engraving tool recovered from Robinson’s residence to markings found on cartridge cases, supporting the prosecution’s allegation that ammunition had been engraved before the shooting. At the same time, the forensic evidence was not absolute across the board: investigators could not conclusively determine that the bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Kirk’s autopsy had been fired from the recovered rifle. By the end of the fourth day, however, prosecutors had combined Robinson’s alleged admissions, Twiggs’ account, the handwritten note, surveillance evidence and extensive DNA testimony into their clearest presentation yet of why they believe Robinson was the shooter.







to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>875breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/diddy-transferred-from-fort-dix-to-fci-allenwood-10-20-26--75878508
The transfer followed a series of controversies at Fort Dix, including reports of disciplinary issues, alleged contraband, special treatment and questions about Combs’ safety inside the facility. Most recently, Combs suffered a head injury that required outside medical treatment, although the Bureau of Prisons denied reports that he had been injured in a fight with fellow inmate Christopher “Dudus” Coke. Combs had also reportedly spent time in restrictive housing following earlier problems at the prison. His move to Allenwood therefore came after an increasingly turbulent period at Fort Dix, with the timing fueling speculation that federal officials wanted to place him in a smaller and potentially more controlled environment for the remainder of his sentence.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Sean 'Diddy' Combs transferred to low-security prison in Pennsylvania

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75878508Tue, 20 Oct 2026 22:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciSean “Diddy” Combs was transferred from FCI Fort Dix in New Jersey to FCI Allenwood Low in Pennsylvania on October 16, 2026, with federal prison officials declining to publicly explain why he was moved. Both facilities are low-security federal...
The transfer followed a series of controversies at Fort Dix, including reports of disciplinary issues, alleged contraband, special treatment and questions about Combs’ safety inside the facility. Most recently, Combs suffered a head injury that required outside medical treatment, although the Bureau of Prisons denied reports that he had been injured in a fight with fellow inmate Christopher “Dudus” Coke. Combs had also reportedly spent time in restrictive housing following earlier problems at the prison. His move to Allenwood therefore came after an increasingly turbulent period at Fort Dix, with the timing fueling speculation that federal officials wanted to place him in a smaller and potentially more controlled environment for the remainder of his sentence.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Sean 'Diddy' Combs transferred to low-security prison in Pennsylvania

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>657breakingnews,dailydiddyreport,diddy,diddydiaries,diddynews,diddynewscentral,diddynewsdaily,diddynewsupdates,diddyontrial,diddytrial,diddytrialnews,diddytrialnewsupdate,diddytrialupdates,news,newsupdate,seancombs,seancombsnews,seandiddycombstrial,thetrialofdiddy,truecrimetruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/todd-blanche-and-the-motion-to-postpone-the-deadline-in-the-katie-phang-lawsuit-part-2-10-20-26--75874263
The filing also directly pushed back on Phang’s argument that the administrative record was necessary to determine whether DOJ had improperly withheld or redacted Epstein-related material, including records referring to President Trump. DOJ maintained that questions about redactions were legal issues, not factual disputes requiring an administrative record, and said that any challenge to individual redactions belonged in a FOIA case through a Vaughn index rather than through the Administrative Procedure Act. The department pointed to the attorney general’s certification that no redactions had been made to avoid political embarrassment and noted that Trump was included among the “politically exposed persons” reviewed during the process. DOJ further argued that Phang had no right to inspect unredacted victim information for herself and emphasized that Judge Emmet Sullivan had already reviewed sensitive records privately. The department therefore asked Sullivan to postpone the administrative-record deadline until he ruled on DOJ’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, effectively arguing that Phang’s effort to obtain a fuller record was both procedurally unnecessary and legally misplaced.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.291779.58.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75874263Tue, 20 Oct 2026 20:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciThe Justice Department’s October 13 filing in Phang v. Blanche was a reply defending its request to postpone the deadline for producing the administrative record in Katie Phang’s lawsuit over the Epstein files. DOJ argued that there was no procedural...
The filing also directly pushed back on Phang’s argument that the administrative record was necessary to determine whether DOJ had improperly withheld or redacted Epstein-related material, including records referring to President Trump. DOJ maintained that questions about redactions were legal issues, not factual disputes requiring an administrative record, and said that any challenge to individual redactions belonged in a FOIA case through a Vaughn index rather than through the Administrative Procedure Act. The department pointed to the attorney general’s certification that no redactions had been made to avoid political embarrassment and noted that Trump was included among the “politically exposed persons” reviewed during the process. DOJ further argued that Phang had no right to inspect unredacted victim information for herself and emphasized that Judge Emmet Sullivan had already reviewed sensitive records privately. The department therefore asked Sullivan to postpone the administrative-record deadline until he ruled on DOJ’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, effectively arguing that Phang’s effort to obtain a fuller record was both procedurally unnecessary and legally misplaced.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.291779.58.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>725epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/todd-blanche-and-the-motion-to-postpone-the-deadline-in-the-katie-phang-lawsuit-part-1-10-20-26--75874261
The filing also directly pushed back on Phang’s argument that the administrative record was necessary to determine whether DOJ had improperly withheld or redacted Epstein-related material, including records referring to President Trump. DOJ maintained that questions about redactions were legal issues, not factual disputes requiring an administrative record, and said that any challenge to individual redactions belonged in a FOIA case through a Vaughn index rather than through the Administrative Procedure Act. The department pointed to the attorney general’s certification that no redactions had been made to avoid political embarrassment and noted that Trump was included among the “politically exposed persons” reviewed during the process. DOJ further argued that Phang had no right to inspect unredacted victim information for herself and emphasized that Judge Emmet Sullivan had already reviewed sensitive records privately. The department therefore asked Sullivan to postpone the administrative-record deadline until he ruled on DOJ’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, effectively arguing that Phang’s effort to obtain a fuller record was both procedurally unnecessary and legally misplaced.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.291779.58.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75874261Tue, 20 Oct 2026 18:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciThe Justice Department’s October 13 filing in Phang v. Blanche was a reply defending its request to postpone the deadline for producing the administrative record in Katie Phang’s lawsuit over the Epstein files. DOJ argued that there was no procedural...
The filing also directly pushed back on Phang’s argument that the administrative record was necessary to determine whether DOJ had improperly withheld or redacted Epstein-related material, including records referring to President Trump. DOJ maintained that questions about redactions were legal issues, not factual disputes requiring an administrative record, and said that any challenge to individual redactions belonged in a FOIA case through a Vaughn index rather than through the Administrative Procedure Act. The department pointed to the attorney general’s certification that no redactions had been made to avoid political embarrassment and noted that Trump was included among the “politically exposed persons” reviewed during the process. DOJ further argued that Phang had no right to inspect unredacted victim information for herself and emphasized that Judge Emmet Sullivan had already reviewed sensitive records privately. The department therefore asked Sullivan to postpone the administrative-record deadline until he ruled on DOJ’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, effectively arguing that Phang’s effort to obtain a fuller record was both procedurally unnecessary and legally misplaced.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.291779.58.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>703breakingnews,dailydiddyreport,diddy,diddydiaries,diddynews,diddynewscentral,diddynewsdaily,diddynewsupdates,diddyontrial,diddytrial,diddytrialnews,diddytrialnewsupdate,diddytrialupdates,news,newsupdate,seancombs,seancombsnews,seandiddycombstrial,thetrialofdiddy,truecrimetruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/reid-hoffman-gives-500-000-to-super-pac-backing-zach-dembo-s-congressional-run-10-20-26--75874264
The super PAC dramatically increased its spending in the race as the campaign intensified, pouring substantial money into television advertising and other efforts to help Dembo. Alvarado used Hoffman’s documented ties to Epstein, including visits to Epstein properties and other contacts, to argue that Dembo was benefiting from the same kind of billionaire influence he had criticized on the campaign trail. The larger political problem for Dembo was therefore one of optics and consistency: even if the money came through an independent group, his candidacy was being boosted by a wealthy donor whose association with Epstein remains highly controversial, giving Republicans an opening to challenge Dembo’s anti-corruption message.



to contacat me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Epstein-linked billionaire's $500K donation sparks clash in key House race | Fox News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75874264Tue, 20 Oct 2026 16:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciLinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman contributed $500,000 on September 24, 2026, to Kentuckians Not Corruption, a super PAC supporting Democratic congressional nominee Zach Dembo in Kentucky’s 6th District. Hoffman’s past relationship with Jeffrey Epstein...
The super PAC dramatically increased its spending in the race as the campaign intensified, pouring substantial money into television advertising and other efforts to help Dembo. Alvarado used Hoffman’s documented ties to Epstein, including visits to Epstein properties and other contacts, to argue that Dembo was benefiting from the same kind of billionaire influence he had criticized on the campaign trail. The larger political problem for Dembo was therefore one of optics and consistency: even if the money came through an independent group, his candidacy was being boosted by a wealthy donor whose association with Epstein remains highly controversial, giving Republicans an opening to challenge Dembo’s anti-corruption message.



to contacat me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Epstein-linked billionaire's $500K donation sparks clash in key House race | Fox News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>767epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/jane-doe-drops-leon-black-case-without-retracting-allegations-10-20-26--75874262
The dismissal came after a difficult procedural history for Doe, who had been representing herself after her former attorneys withdrew from the case. Judge Jessica Clarke had previously sanctioned Doe and one of her former lawyers for what the court described as serious misconduct, including false representations to the court, but had nevertheless allowed the underlying lawsuit to continue. At the time Doe sought dismissal, both sides were preparing to review thousands of pages of Epstein-related records for possible public release, a process Doe said was worsening her medical condition because it required her to repeatedly confront graphic material concerning sexual abuse and personal records. The end of the civil case did not resolve the truth of the underlying rape allegation, and it did not end the broader scrutiny surrounding Black, who has separately faced congressional pressure over his extensive financial relationship with Epstein and his refusal to comply with House Oversight subpoenas.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Case against Leon Black dismissed after plaintiff said she was ‘medically incapable of continuing’ | Jeffrey Epstein | The Guardian

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75874262Tue, 20 Oct 2026 14:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciA federal judge dismissed with prejudice the civil lawsuit brought against Leon Black by an anonymous woman who had accused him of raping her after she was allegedly “handed off” to him by Jeffrey Epstein. The woman, identified as Jane Doe, said she...
The dismissal came after a difficult procedural history for Doe, who had been representing herself after her former attorneys withdrew from the case. Judge Jessica Clarke had previously sanctioned Doe and one of her former lawyers for what the court described as serious misconduct, including false representations to the court, but had nevertheless allowed the underlying lawsuit to continue. At the time Doe sought dismissal, both sides were preparing to review thousands of pages of Epstein-related records for possible public release, a process Doe said was worsening her medical condition because it required her to repeatedly confront graphic material concerning sexual abuse and personal records. The end of the civil case did not resolve the truth of the underlying rape allegation, and it did not end the broader scrutiny surrounding Black, who has separately faced congressional pressure over his extensive financial relationship with Epstein and his refusal to comply with House Oversight subpoenas.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Case against Leon Black dismissed after plaintiff said she was ‘medically incapable of continuing’ | Jeffrey Epstein | The Guardian

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>785epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/todd-blanche-s-doj-forced-to-turn-over-epstein-interview-notes-10-20-26--75874260
The larger story was the amount of judicial pressure required to get DOJ to produce material that Sullivan had already specifically ordered it to provide. The department acknowledged that it had previously given Sullivan unredacted copies of the notes on September 24 but had not created redacted versions because it considered the documents duplicative and therefore unnecessary for the public Epstein Library. Sullivan pointed out that DOJ had already published nearly 100 examples of redacted handwritten interview notes elsewhere, undermining its argument that these particular records presented insurmountable processing problems, and he gave the department another deadline to comply. Even after turning them over, DOJ continued resisting their public release, asking Sullivan to stay any future order requiring publication so the government could seek appellate review. Raw Story therefore framed the episode as another example of Blanche’s DOJ surrendering Epstein-related material only after sustained litigation and the prospect of sanctions or contempt, rather than voluntarily making the records available under the transparency law.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


Contempt threat pries loose FBI notes on Trump sex abuse allegation DOJ fought to withhold - Raw Story

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75874260Tue, 20 Oct 2026 12:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciAttorney General Todd Blanche’s Justice Department turned over handwritten FBI notes connected to three interviews with a woman who alleged that Jeffrey Epstein introduced her to Donald Trump when she was approximately 13 years old and that Trump...
The larger story was the amount of judicial pressure required to get DOJ to produce material that Sullivan had already specifically ordered it to provide. The department acknowledged that it had previously given Sullivan unredacted copies of the notes on September 24 but had not created redacted versions because it considered the documents duplicative and therefore unnecessary for the public Epstein Library. Sullivan pointed out that DOJ had already published nearly 100 examples of redacted handwritten interview notes elsewhere, undermining its argument that these particular records presented insurmountable processing problems, and he gave the department another deadline to comply. Even after turning them over, DOJ continued resisting their public release, asking Sullivan to stay any future order requiring publication so the government could seek appellate review. Raw Story therefore framed the episode as another example of Blanche’s DOJ surrendering Epstein-related material only after sustained litigation and the prospect of sanctions or contempt, rather than voluntarily making the records available under the transparency law.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


Contempt threat pries loose FBI notes on Trump sex abuse allegation DOJ fought to withhold - Raw Story

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>725epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-chad-daybell-trial-part-8-10-20-26--75862364
The afternoon brought some of the day’s most emotional testimony when Lori’s oldest son, Colby Ryan, took the stand. Colby described learning that Charles Vallow had died after Lori initially lied and told him Charles suffered a heart attack, and he recalled being disturbed by how calm and unaffected Lori appeared afterward. He testified about the last time he saw Tylee and JJ, recalled Tylee crying before the family moved to Idaho, and said later text exchanges from Tylee’s phone did not feel normal to him. Colby also testified that money continued arriving from Tylee’s Venmo account after he had stopped hearing directly from her and that Lori had told him Tylee’s Social Security money would become “everybody’s money.” The day concluded with testimony from David Warwick, Melanie Gibb’s husband, who described Chad and Lori’s teachings about evil spirits, past lives, the gathering of the 144,000 and people being possessed. Warwick said Chad told him Tammy would die young and that Lori had been his wife in a previous life, and he described seeing Alex Cox carry JJ upstairs on the night of September 22, 2019, the last night JJ was known to be alive. Warwick said that the next morning Lori claimed JJ had become uncontrollable and Alex had taken him away, even though Warwick had never seen Tylee during the entire four-day visit.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75862364Tue, 20 Oct 2026 10:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay eight of Chad Daybell’s trial began with retired FBI Special Agent Doug Hart continuing his testimony about the messages exchanged between Chad and Lori Vallow. Jurors saw texts showing the two arguing over when they could be together while Chad...
The afternoon brought some of the day’s most emotional testimony when Lori’s oldest son, Colby Ryan, took the stand. Colby described learning that Charles Vallow had died after Lori initially lied and told him Charles suffered a heart attack, and he recalled being disturbed by how calm and unaffected Lori appeared afterward. He testified about the last time he saw Tylee and JJ, recalled Tylee crying before the family moved to Idaho, and said later text exchanges from Tylee’s phone did not feel normal to him. Colby also testified that money continued arriving from Tylee’s Venmo account after he had stopped hearing directly from her and that Lori had told him Tylee’s Social Security money would become “everybody’s money.” The day concluded with testimony from David Warwick, Melanie Gibb’s husband, who described Chad and Lori’s teachings about evil spirits, past lives, the gathering of the 144,000 and people being possessed. Warwick said Chad told him Tammy would die young and that Lori had been his wife in a previous life, and he described seeing Alex Cox carry JJ upstairs on the night of September 22, 2019, the last night JJ was known to be alive. Warwick said that the next morning Lori claimed JJ had become uncontrollable and Alex had taken him away, even though Warwick had never seen Tylee during the entire four-day visit.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3454chaddaybell,chaddaybelltrial,courtroomcoverage,daybellcase,daybellmurders,doomsdaycouple,doomsdayprophet,idahomurders,idahotruecrime,jjandtylee,justiceforjj,justicefortammy,justicefortylee,lorivallow,lorivallowdaybell,murdertrial,tammydaybell,truecrime,truecrimecommunity,truecrimepodcasttruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-chad-daybell-trial-part-7-10-20-26--75862363
The focus then shifted dramatically when former FBI Special Agent Douglas Hart took the stand and began walking jurors through messages recovered from Lori’s “Lollytime” iCloud account. The texts showed that Chad and Lori’s relationship had become intensely romantic and sexual almost immediately after Charles Vallow was killed, even though Chad remained married to Tammy. Hart testified that the messages showed the affair was not merely spiritual or emotional but physical and sexual, and jurors saw messages in which Chad and Lori discussed eventually being together openly and living in Hawaii. Just two days after Charles’ death, Chad texted Lori that he believed a woman Hart understood to be Tammy would soon be “gone,” and other messages showed Chad comparing his home life to Harry Potter living under the stairs before escaping to adventures with his “goddess lover.” Hart also discussed an autobiographical story Chad had written about himself and Lori under the names James and Elena, portraying their relationship as something ordained across previous lives. The testimony gave prosecutors a powerful chronological picture of Chad and Lori planning a future together while Tammy was still alive and only days after Charles Vallow had been killed.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75862363Tue, 20 Oct 2026 08:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciDay seven of Chad Daybell’s trial began with defense attorney John Prior continuing his cross-examination of Melanie Gibb, attempting to undermine her credibility and separate Chad from some of Lori Vallow’s actions. Prior pressed Gibb about...
The focus then shifted dramatically when former FBI Special Agent Douglas Hart took the stand and began walking jurors through messages recovered from Lori’s “Lollytime” iCloud account. The texts showed that Chad and Lori’s relationship had become intensely romantic and sexual almost immediately after Charles Vallow was killed, even though Chad remained married to Tammy. Hart testified that the messages showed the affair was not merely spiritual or emotional but physical and sexual, and jurors saw messages in which Chad and Lori discussed eventually being together openly and living in Hawaii. Just two days after Charles’ death, Chad texted Lori that he believed a woman Hart understood to be Tammy would soon be “gone,” and other messages showed Chad comparing his home life to Harry Potter living under the stairs before escaping to adventures with his “goddess lover.” Hart also discussed an autobiographical story Chad had written about himself and Lori under the names James and Elena, portraying their relationship as something ordained across previous lives. The testimony gave prosecutors a powerful chronological picture of Chad and Lori planning a future together while Tammy was still alive and only days after Charles Vallow had been killed.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2437chaddaybell,chaddaybelltrial,courtroomcoverage,daybellcase,daybellmurders,doomsdaycouple,doomsdayprophet,idahomurders,idahotruecrime,jjandtylee,justiceforjj,justicefortammy,justicefortylee,lorivallow,lorivallowdaybell,murdertrial,tammydaybell,truecrime,truecrimecommunity,truecrimepodcasttruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-chad-daybell-trial-part-6-10-19-26--75862365
Gibb also testified about the lies surrounding JJ’s disappearance and the moment she began turning against Chad and Lori. She said Chad called her in November 2019 sounding nervous and told her not to answer calls from Rexburg police, while Lori later asked Gibb to photograph herself at a children’s movie so investigators could be led to believe JJ was with her. Gibb initially lied to police and said JJ had been with her, but later admitted that was false and began cooperating with investigators. Jurors heard the December 2019 phone call Gibb secretly recorded in which she confronted Chad and Lori about JJ’s whereabouts, the lies told to police and the deaths of Charles and Tammy; Lori insisted JJ was safe and claimed she had done nothing wrong, while Chad defended his account of Tammy’s death. During cross-examination, defense attorney John Prior attacked Gibb’s credibility, emphasized her admitted lie to police and sought to show that much of what she knew had come from Lori rather than directly from Chad. After the jury portion ended, Judge Steven Boyce also sanctioned attorney Michael Ratliff for filing what the judge called a frivolous last-minute attempt to intervene in and delay the trial, ordering him to pay costs generated by the filing.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75862365Tue, 20 Oct 2026 06:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciDay six of Chad Daybell’s trial was dominated by testimony from Melanie Gibb, Lori Vallow Daybell’s former close friend, who gave jurors an inside look at the belief system Chad and Lori developed as their relationship intensified. Gibb described how...
Gibb also testified about the lies surrounding JJ’s disappearance and the moment she began turning against Chad and Lori. She said Chad called her in November 2019 sounding nervous and told her not to answer calls from Rexburg police, while Lori later asked Gibb to photograph herself at a children’s movie so investigators could be led to believe JJ was with her. Gibb initially lied to police and said JJ had been with her, but later admitted that was false and began cooperating with investigators. Jurors heard the December 2019 phone call Gibb secretly recorded in which she confronted Chad and Lori about JJ’s whereabouts, the lies told to police and the deaths of Charles and Tammy; Lori insisted JJ was safe and claimed she had done nothing wrong, while Chad defended his account of Tammy’s death. During cross-examination, defense attorney John Prior attacked Gibb’s credibility, emphasized her admitted lie to police and sought to show that much of what she knew had come from Lori rather than directly from Chad. After the jury portion ended, Judge Steven Boyce also sanctioned attorney Michael Ratliff for filing what the judge called a frivolous last-minute attempt to intervene in and delay the trial, ordering him to pay costs generated by the filing.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>4471chaddaybell,chaddaybelltrial,courtroomcoverage,daybellcase,daybellmurders,doomsdaycouple,doomsdayprophet,idahomurders,idahotruecrime,jjandtylee,justiceforjj,justicefortammy,justicefortylee,lorivallow,lorivallowdaybell,murdertrial,tammydaybell,truecrime,truecrimecommunity,truecrimepodcasttruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/one-of-madison-mogen-s-sorority-sisters-speaks-out--75862458
Moye had known both Mogen and Kernodle through Pi Beta Phi and had occasionally visited the King Road house before it became a crime scene. She said the murders had cast a darkness over the close-knit University of Idaho community and had changed the way she and other students viewed their surroundings. Moye lived behind the King Road residence and said the possibility that the killer might have passed through her yard had crossed her mind and terrified her. She also said she planned to change her habits and carry pepper spray when walking around campus. Her recollection underscored how ordinary the victims’ final evening had appeared before Ethan Chapin, Xana Kernodle, Madison Mogen and Kaylee Goncalves were found stabbed to death inside the house the following day.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75862458Tue, 20 Oct 2026 04:40:01 +0000Bobby CapucciMadison Moye, a University of Idaho student and sorority sister of Madison Mogen and Xana Kernodle, recalled seeing Mogen at the Corner Club in Moscow on the night of November 12, 2022, only hours before the murders. Moye said Mogen had spent much of...
Moye had known both Mogen and Kernodle through Pi Beta Phi and had occasionally visited the King Road house before it became a crime scene. She said the murders had cast a darkness over the close-knit University of Idaho community and had changed the way she and other students viewed their surroundings. Moye lived behind the King Road residence and said the possibility that the killer might have passed through her yard had crossed her mind and terrified her. She also said she planned to change her habits and carry pepper spray when walking around campus. Her recollection underscored how ordinary the victims’ final evening had appeared before Ethan Chapin, Xana Kernodle, Madison Mogen and Kaylee Goncalves were found stabbed to death inside the house the following day.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>781bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/bryan-kohberger-and-the-game-of-legal-gamesmanship--75862457
In a separate motion, Kohberger's attorney, Anne Taylor, revealed that he has been diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). She contends that this diagnosis should exempt him from the death penalty, asserting that ASD reduces his culpability and poses a risk of wrongful conviction due to potential misinterpretation of his behaviors by jurors. However, legal experts suggest that an autism diagnosis is unlikely to prevent the application of the death penalty, as current legal precedents do not consider ASD a barrier to such sentencing.


source:

Bryan Kohberger defense ramps up legal maneuvers in bid to avoid death row | Fox News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75862457Tue, 20 Oct 2026 02:20:02 +0000Bobby Capucci​Bryan Kohberger's defense team has intensified efforts to prevent the imposition of the death penalty in his upcoming trial for the alleged murders of four University of Idaho students. Recent legal maneuvers include motions to prohibit the use of...
In a separate motion, Kohberger's attorney, Anne Taylor, revealed that he has been diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). She contends that this diagnosis should exempt him from the death penalty, asserting that ASD reduces his culpability and poses a risk of wrongful conviction due to potential misinterpretation of his behaviors by jurors. However, legal experts suggest that an autism diagnosis is unlikely to prevent the application of the death penalty, as current legal precedents do not consider ASD a barrier to such sentencing.


source:

Bryan Kohberger defense ramps up legal maneuvers in bid to avoid death row | Fox News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>972bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcript-day-4-part-16-10-18-26--75861329

The state also spent a significant portion of the day strengthening the forensic connection between Robinson and the physical evidence. Investigators testified that Robinson’s DNA was found on numerous portions of the rifle recovered near Utah Valley University, including the stock, grips, trigger area, bolt and barrel, as well as on ammunition associated with the weapon. An ATF analysis also linked a rotary engraving tool recovered from Robinson’s residence to markings found on cartridge cases, supporting the prosecution’s allegation that ammunition had been engraved before the shooting. At the same time, the forensic evidence was not absolute across the board: investigators could not conclusively determine that the bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Kirk’s autopsy had been fired from the recovered rifle. By the end of the fourth day, however, prosecutors had combined Robinson’s alleged admissions, Twiggs’ account, the handwritten note, surveillance evidence and extensive DNA testimony into their clearest presentation yet of why they believe Robinson was the shooter.







to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75861329Tue, 20 Oct 2026 00:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay four of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing, held July 9, centered on some of the prosecution’s most consequential evidence yet, including a recorded interview with Robinson’s former roommate and romantic partner, Lance Twiggs. In the interview,...

The state also spent a significant portion of the day strengthening the forensic connection between Robinson and the physical evidence. Investigators testified that Robinson’s DNA was found on numerous portions of the rifle recovered near Utah Valley University, including the stock, grips, trigger area, bolt and barrel, as well as on ammunition associated with the weapon. An ATF analysis also linked a rotary engraving tool recovered from Robinson’s residence to markings found on cartridge cases, supporting the prosecution’s allegation that ammunition had been engraved before the shooting. At the same time, the forensic evidence was not absolute across the board: investigators could not conclusively determine that the bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Kirk’s autopsy had been fired from the recovered rifle. By the end of the fourth day, however, prosecutors had combined Robinson’s alleged admissions, Twiggs’ account, the handwritten note, surveillance evidence and extensive DNA testimony into their clearest presentation yet of why they believe Robinson was the shooter.







to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>839breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-doj-moves-to-dismiss-the-epstein-related-lawsuit-filed-by-new-mexico-part-4-10-19-26--75861302
DOJ’s central argument was that New Mexico could not use the Administrative Procedure Act to force the federal government to share investigative information because law-enforcement-to-law-enforcement disclosure was discretionary, not legally mandatory. Even if the judge reached the merits, DOJ argued that its refusal was reasonable because releasing the requested material could violate victim-protection orders entered in the Epstein and Maxwell cases, the Privacy Act, grand-jury secrecy rules and statutes protecting child-victim information, financial records and certain investigative materials. The department also argued that disclosure could expose investigative techniques or interfere with continuing law-enforcement efforts, while emphasizing that New Mexico’s request was overly broad and was not tied to an existing criminal prosecution or judicial proceeding. In short, DOJ was asking the court to reject New Mexico’s attempt to compel access to the unredacted Epstein files, arguing that federal law gave DOJ the authority to decide what information it would share and that the state had no enforceable right to demand the entire investigative record.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:
gov.uscourts.dcd.295266.8.1.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75861302Mon, 19 Oct 2026 22:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciThe filing was the Justice Department’s October 12, 2026 memorandum asking the federal court to dismiss New Mexico’s lawsuit over access to unredacted Jeffrey Epstein records or, alternatively, grant summary judgment in DOJ’s favor. The department...
DOJ’s central argument was that New Mexico could not use the Administrative Procedure Act to force the federal government to share investigative information because law-enforcement-to-law-enforcement disclosure was discretionary, not legally mandatory. Even if the judge reached the merits, DOJ argued that its refusal was reasonable because releasing the requested material could violate victim-protection orders entered in the Epstein and Maxwell cases, the Privacy Act, grand-jury secrecy rules and statutes protecting child-victim information, financial records and certain investigative materials. The department also argued that disclosure could expose investigative techniques or interfere with continuing law-enforcement efforts, while emphasizing that New Mexico’s request was overly broad and was not tied to an existing criminal prosecution or judicial proceeding. In short, DOJ was asking the court to reject New Mexico’s attempt to compel access to the unredacted Epstein files, arguing that federal law gave DOJ the authority to decide what information it would share and that the state had no enforceable right to demand the entire investigative record.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:
gov.uscourts.dcd.295266.8.1.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>667epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-doj-moves-to-dismiss-the-epstein-related-lawsuit-filed-by-new-mexico-part-3-10-19-26--75861304
DOJ’s central argument was that New Mexico could not use the Administrative Procedure Act to force the federal government to share investigative information because law-enforcement-to-law-enforcement disclosure was discretionary, not legally mandatory. Even if the judge reached the merits, DOJ argued that its refusal was reasonable because releasing the requested material could violate victim-protection orders entered in the Epstein and Maxwell cases, the Privacy Act, grand-jury secrecy rules and statutes protecting child-victim information, financial records and certain investigative materials. The department also argued that disclosure could expose investigative techniques or interfere with continuing law-enforcement efforts, while emphasizing that New Mexico’s request was overly broad and was not tied to an existing criminal prosecution or judicial proceeding. In short, DOJ was asking the court to reject New Mexico’s attempt to compel access to the unredacted Epstein files, arguing that federal law gave DOJ the authority to decide what information it would share and that the state had no enforceable right to demand the entire investigative record.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:
gov.uscourts.dcd.295266.8.1.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75861304Mon, 19 Oct 2026 20:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciThe filing was the Justice Department’s October 12, 2026 memorandum asking the federal court to dismiss New Mexico’s lawsuit over access to unredacted Jeffrey Epstein records or, alternatively, grant summary judgment in DOJ’s favor. The department...
DOJ’s central argument was that New Mexico could not use the Administrative Procedure Act to force the federal government to share investigative information because law-enforcement-to-law-enforcement disclosure was discretionary, not legally mandatory. Even if the judge reached the merits, DOJ argued that its refusal was reasonable because releasing the requested material could violate victim-protection orders entered in the Epstein and Maxwell cases, the Privacy Act, grand-jury secrecy rules and statutes protecting child-victim information, financial records and certain investigative materials. The department also argued that disclosure could expose investigative techniques or interfere with continuing law-enforcement efforts, while emphasizing that New Mexico’s request was overly broad and was not tied to an existing criminal prosecution or judicial proceeding. In short, DOJ was asking the court to reject New Mexico’s attempt to compel access to the unredacted Epstein files, arguing that federal law gave DOJ the authority to decide what information it would share and that the state had no enforceable right to demand the entire investigative record.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:
gov.uscourts.dcd.295266.8.1.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>702epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-doj-moves-to-dismiss-the-epstein-related-lawsuit-filed-by-new-mexico-part-2-10-19-26--75861303
DOJ’s central argument was that New Mexico could not use the Administrative Procedure Act to force the federal government to share investigative information because law-enforcement-to-law-enforcement disclosure was discretionary, not legally mandatory. Even if the judge reached the merits, DOJ argued that its refusal was reasonable because releasing the requested material could violate victim-protection orders entered in the Epstein and Maxwell cases, the Privacy Act, grand-jury secrecy rules and statutes protecting child-victim information, financial records and certain investigative materials. The department also argued that disclosure could expose investigative techniques or interfere with continuing law-enforcement efforts, while emphasizing that New Mexico’s request was overly broad and was not tied to an existing criminal prosecution or judicial proceeding. In short, DOJ was asking the court to reject New Mexico’s attempt to compel access to the unredacted Epstein files, arguing that federal law gave DOJ the authority to decide what information it would share and that the state had no enforceable right to demand the entire investigative record.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:
gov.uscourts.dcd.295266.8.1.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75861303Mon, 19 Oct 2026 18:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe filing was the Justice Department’s October 12, 2026 memorandum asking the federal court to dismiss New Mexico’s lawsuit over access to unredacted Jeffrey Epstein records or, alternatively, grant summary judgment in DOJ’s favor. The department...
DOJ’s central argument was that New Mexico could not use the Administrative Procedure Act to force the federal government to share investigative information because law-enforcement-to-law-enforcement disclosure was discretionary, not legally mandatory. Even if the judge reached the merits, DOJ argued that its refusal was reasonable because releasing the requested material could violate victim-protection orders entered in the Epstein and Maxwell cases, the Privacy Act, grand-jury secrecy rules and statutes protecting child-victim information, financial records and certain investigative materials. The department also argued that disclosure could expose investigative techniques or interfere with continuing law-enforcement efforts, while emphasizing that New Mexico’s request was overly broad and was not tied to an existing criminal prosecution or judicial proceeding. In short, DOJ was asking the court to reject New Mexico’s attempt to compel access to the unredacted Epstein files, arguing that federal law gave DOJ the authority to decide what information it would share and that the state had no enforceable right to demand the entire investigative record.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:
gov.uscourts.dcd.295266.8.1.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>700epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-doj-moves-to-dismiss-the-epstein-related-lawsuit-filed-by-new-mexico-part-1-10-19-26--75861301
DOJ’s central argument was that New Mexico could not use the Administrative Procedure Act to force the federal government to share investigative information because law-enforcement-to-law-enforcement disclosure was discretionary, not legally mandatory. Even if the judge reached the merits, DOJ argued that its refusal was reasonable because releasing the requested material could violate victim-protection orders entered in the Epstein and Maxwell cases, the Privacy Act, grand-jury secrecy rules and statutes protecting child-victim information, financial records and certain investigative materials. The department also argued that disclosure could expose investigative techniques or interfere with continuing law-enforcement efforts, while emphasizing that New Mexico’s request was overly broad and was not tied to an existing criminal prosecution or judicial proceeding. In short, DOJ was asking the court to reject New Mexico’s attempt to compel access to the unredacted Epstein files, arguing that federal law gave DOJ the authority to decide what information it would share and that the state had no enforceable right to demand the entire investigative record.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:
gov.uscourts.dcd.295266.8.1.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75861301Mon, 19 Oct 2026 16:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe filing was the Justice Department’s October 12, 2026 memorandum asking the federal court to dismiss New Mexico’s lawsuit over access to unredacted Jeffrey Epstein records or, alternatively, grant summary judgment in DOJ’s favor. The department...
DOJ’s central argument was that New Mexico could not use the Administrative Procedure Act to force the federal government to share investigative information because law-enforcement-to-law-enforcement disclosure was discretionary, not legally mandatory. Even if the judge reached the merits, DOJ argued that its refusal was reasonable because releasing the requested material could violate victim-protection orders entered in the Epstein and Maxwell cases, the Privacy Act, grand-jury secrecy rules and statutes protecting child-victim information, financial records and certain investigative materials. The department also argued that disclosure could expose investigative techniques or interfere with continuing law-enforcement efforts, while emphasizing that New Mexico’s request was overly broad and was not tied to an existing criminal prosecution or judicial proceeding. In short, DOJ was asking the court to reject New Mexico’s attempt to compel access to the unredacted Epstein files, arguing that federal law gave DOJ the authority to decide what information it would share and that the state had no enforceable right to demand the entire investigative record.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:
gov.uscourts.dcd.295266.8.1.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>745epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/following-the-paper-trail-on-ghislaine-maxwell-s-naturalization-10-19-26--75857962
The story places that possibility against the broader controversy surrounding Maxwell’s current circumstances, including her transfer to the minimum-security federal prison camp in Bryan, Texas, her attempts to obtain clemency, and allegations that she has received unusually favorable treatment while incarcerated. It argues that denaturalization could ultimately expose Maxwell to removal from the United States after she serves her sentence, most plausibly to the United Kingdom, although such an action would require the Justice Department to actually initiate proceedings and prove the necessary elements in court. The piece is considerably more confident about the strength of a potential denaturalization case than the public record itself establishes, but its central point is that Maxwell’s pre-citizenship conduct and the answers on her N-400 application could provide the government with another legal avenue against her separate from her criminal conviction.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Ghislaine Maxwell Lied on Her Citizenship Form—And It Could Strip Her U.S. Status – La Voce di New York

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75857962Mon, 19 Oct 2026 14:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciThe piece argues that Ghislaine Maxwell’s U.S. citizenship could potentially be challenged because of answers she gave on her naturalization application before becoming a citizen in 2002. According to the story, Maxwell answered “no” when asked...
The story places that possibility against the broader controversy surrounding Maxwell’s current circumstances, including her transfer to the minimum-security federal prison camp in Bryan, Texas, her attempts to obtain clemency, and allegations that she has received unusually favorable treatment while incarcerated. It argues that denaturalization could ultimately expose Maxwell to removal from the United States after she serves her sentence, most plausibly to the United Kingdom, although such an action would require the Justice Department to actually initiate proceedings and prove the necessary elements in court. The piece is considerably more confident about the strength of a potential denaturalization case than the public record itself establishes, but its central point is that Maxwell’s pre-citizenship conduct and the answers on her N-400 application could provide the government with another legal avenue against her separate from her criminal conviction.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Ghislaine Maxwell Lied on Her Citizenship Form—And It Could Strip Her U.S. Status – La Voce di New York

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>657epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/police-worried-royal-permission-could-derail-searches-of-andrew-s-homes-10-19-26--75857961
The searches have since become the subject of a significant legal fight because Thames Valley Police conceded that the warrants used to raid Andrew’s properties were unlawful. Andrew, who was arrested on February 19 on suspicion of misconduct in public office and later released under investigation, denied wrongdoing and challenged both the searches and the police justification for conducting them without first seeking his cooperation. His lawyers argued that officers never contacted Andrew or his legal team to ask for voluntary access and disputed suggestions that he could not be trusted to cooperate. Police, meanwhile, have asked the court for permission to retain evidence seized during the unlawful searches, a request Andrew is opposing. That question is expected to be decided at a private hearing in 2027, leaving both the fate of the seized material and the broader criminal investigation unresolved.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Police feared Andrew would block searches by demanding King’s permission | The Independent

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75857961Mon, 19 Oct 2026 12:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciNewly released High Court documents showed that Thames Valley Police feared Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor could obstruct searches of his properties by arguing that officers needed permission from King Charles because the residences or property belonged...
The searches have since become the subject of a significant legal fight because Thames Valley Police conceded that the warrants used to raid Andrew’s properties were unlawful. Andrew, who was arrested on February 19 on suspicion of misconduct in public office and later released under investigation, denied wrongdoing and challenged both the searches and the police justification for conducting them without first seeking his cooperation. His lawyers argued that officers never contacted Andrew or his legal team to ask for voluntary access and disputed suggestions that he could not be trusted to cooperate. Police, meanwhile, have asked the court for permission to retain evidence seized during the unlawful searches, a request Andrew is opposing. That question is expected to be decided at a private hearing in 2027, leaving both the fate of the seized material and the broader criminal investigation unresolved.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Police feared Andrew would block searches by demanding King’s permission | The Independent

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>722epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-chad-daybell-trial-part-5-10-19-26--75847753
The afternoon shifted even more sharply toward money when FBI forensic accountant Michael Douglass testified about roughly 80 financial accounts he had reviewed during the investigation. Douglass presented timelines showing that more than $22,000 in Social Security money had gone into Lori’s account after the children were dead, while also detailing Chad’s finances, Tammy Daybell’s increased life-insurance coverage and money movements around major events in the case. Jurors heard that Tammy’s life-insurance coverage was increased on September 8, 2019, the same date prosecutors identified as Tylee’s last known day alive, and that Chad later collected the policy after Tammy’s death. Most strikingly, Douglass testified that on June 9, 2020, while police were actively searching Chad’s property and discovering the children’s remains, Chad transferred large sums of money to several of his children, including multiple $8,000 transfers. The prosecution used the day’s testimony to argue that the financial and travel records were not isolated details but part of a broader timeline showing how Chad and Lori continued moving money, traveling and planning a new life while JJ and Tylee were missing and after Tammy was dead.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75847753Mon, 19 Oct 2026 10:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciDay five of Chad Daybell’s trial focused heavily on financial and travel records prosecutors said helped establish the timeline surrounding the disappearances of JJ Vallow and Tylee Ryan and the relationship between Chad and Lori Vallow. Rexburg...
The afternoon shifted even more sharply toward money when FBI forensic accountant Michael Douglass testified about roughly 80 financial accounts he had reviewed during the investigation. Douglass presented timelines showing that more than $22,000 in Social Security money had gone into Lori’s account after the children were dead, while also detailing Chad’s finances, Tammy Daybell’s increased life-insurance coverage and money movements around major events in the case. Jurors heard that Tammy’s life-insurance coverage was increased on September 8, 2019, the same date prosecutors identified as Tylee’s last known day alive, and that Chad later collected the policy after Tammy’s death. Most strikingly, Douglass testified that on June 9, 2020, while police were actively searching Chad’s property and discovering the children’s remains, Chad transferred large sums of money to several of his children, including multiple $8,000 transfers. The prosecution used the day’s testimony to argue that the financial and travel records were not isolated details but part of a broader timeline showing how Chad and Lori continued moving money, traveling and planning a new life while JJ and Tylee were missing and after Tammy was dead.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3043chaddaybell,chaddaybelltrial,courtroomcoverage,daybellcase,daybellmurders,doomsdaycouple,doomsdayprophet,idahomurders,idahotruecrime,jjandtylee,justiceforjj,justicefortammy,justicefortylee,lorivallow,lorivallowdaybell,murdertrial,tammydaybell,truecrime,truecrimecommunity,truecrimepodcasttruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-chad-daybell-trial-part-4-10-19-26--75847751Day four of Chad Daybell’s trial focused heavily on the digital trail prosecutors said connected Daybell and Lori Vallow to the beliefs and events surrounding the deaths. FBI tactical specialist Nicole Heideman continued walking jurors through internet searches and electronic records tied to Chad and Lori, including searches for “Ned Schneider,” the name associated with the entity they believed had possessed Charles Vallow, as well as a search asking whether bodies could be possessed after the original occupant died. Chandler Police Detective Nathan Duncan then testified about the investigation into Charles Vallow’s July 2019 shooting death and reviewed text messages between Lori, Chad and Alex Cox. Among them was a message from Cox telling Lori to “get rid of Ned already,” along with exchanges between Chad and Lori about Charles’ life-insurance policy after Lori learned she was no longer the beneficiary. Prosecutors used the evidence to show jurors how the couple’s unusual spiritual beliefs overlapped with discussions about death, money and people they had labeled as possessed.

The day also brought financial evidence into sharper focus when Social Security Administration investigator Mark Saari testified about benefits Lori continued receiving for JJ Vallow and Tylee Ryan. Saari said Tylee had been receiving $1,859 per month following the death of her father, Joe Ryan, while JJ received $1,951, with Lori serving as representative payee; prosecutors highlighted that Lori changed the account receiving Tylee’s benefits less than a month before Tylee was last seen alive. Outside the jury’s presence, the court also dealt with a significant fight over whether prosecutor Rob Wood could be called as a witness because of roughly 340 text exchanges between Wood and Melanie Gibb. Judge Steven Boyce ruled that Wood would not testify for the prosecution, although the messages could still be explored when Gibb testified. Overall, day four pushed the state’s case deeper into motive and conspiracy, using electronic communications, financial records and the couple’s belief system to argue that the deaths were part of a broader pattern rather than isolated events.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75847751Mon, 19 Oct 2026 08:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay four of Chad Daybell’s trial focused heavily on the digital trail prosecutors said connected Daybell and Lori Vallow to the beliefs and events surrounding the deaths. FBI tactical specialist Nicole Heideman continued walking jurors through...Day four of Chad Daybell’s trial focused heavily on the digital trail prosecutors said connected Daybell and Lori Vallow to the beliefs and events surrounding the deaths. FBI tactical specialist Nicole Heideman continued walking jurors through internet searches and electronic records tied to Chad and Lori, including searches for “Ned Schneider,” the name associated with the entity they believed had possessed Charles Vallow, as well as a search asking whether bodies could be possessed after the original occupant died. Chandler Police Detective Nathan Duncan then testified about the investigation into Charles Vallow’s July 2019 shooting death and reviewed text messages between Lori, Chad and Alex Cox. Among them was a message from Cox telling Lori to “get rid of Ned already,” along with exchanges between Chad and Lori about Charles’ life-insurance policy after Lori learned she was no longer the beneficiary. Prosecutors used the evidence to show jurors how the couple’s unusual spiritual beliefs overlapped with discussions about death, money and people they had labeled as possessed.

The day also brought financial evidence into sharper focus when Social Security Administration investigator Mark Saari testified about benefits Lori continued receiving for JJ Vallow and Tylee Ryan. Saari said Tylee had been receiving $1,859 per month following the death of her father, Joe Ryan, while JJ received $1,951, with Lori serving as representative payee; prosecutors highlighted that Lori changed the account receiving Tylee’s benefits less than a month before Tylee was last seen alive. Outside the jury’s presence, the court also dealt with a significant fight over whether prosecutor Rob Wood could be called as a witness because of roughly 340 text exchanges between Wood and Melanie Gibb. Judge Steven Boyce ruled that Wood would not testify for the prosecution, although the messages could still be explored when Gibb testified. Overall, day four pushed the state’s case deeper into motive and conspiracy, using electronic communications, financial records and the couple’s belief system to argue that the deaths were part of a broader pattern rather than isolated events.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3964chaddaybell,chaddaybelltrial,courtroomcoverage,daybellcase,daybellmurders,doomsdaycouple,doomsdayprophet,idahomurders,idahotruecrime,jjandtylee,justiceforjj,justicefortammy,justicefortylee,lorivallow,lorivallowdaybell,murdertrial,tammydaybell,truecrime,truecrimecommunity,truecrimepodcasttruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-s-death-and-the-38-minute-gap-in-reporting-10-18-26--75847752
The controversy centered on how the anonymous poster could have possessed that information before journalists had reported Epstein’s death and whether the person had been directly involved in the emergency response. The FDNY reviewed the postings because of the possibility that a firefighter, EMT or other first responder had leaked confidential medical information, but ultimately said it determined that the information had not originated from its department. That answer did not identify the poster or explain how the person obtained such detailed information so quickly, leaving open the possibility that the source had been connected to the hospital, another medical provider, law enforcement or someone else with immediate knowledge of what happened. The post did not prove that Epstein had been murdered or that the official finding of suicide was false, but it became another source of skepticism because someone outside the official public-information process appeared to know not only that Epstein was dead, but details about the attempted resuscitation, before the rest of the country had even been told that he had died.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci!protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75847752Mon, 19 Oct 2026 06:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciOne of the strangest unresolved episodes surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s death involved an anonymous 4chan user who appeared to announce his death before the news became public. Epstein was officially pronounced dead at NewYork-Presbyterian Lower...
The controversy centered on how the anonymous poster could have possessed that information before journalists had reported Epstein’s death and whether the person had been directly involved in the emergency response. The FDNY reviewed the postings because of the possibility that a firefighter, EMT or other first responder had leaked confidential medical information, but ultimately said it determined that the information had not originated from its department. That answer did not identify the poster or explain how the person obtained such detailed information so quickly, leaving open the possibility that the source had been connected to the hospital, another medical provider, law enforcement or someone else with immediate knowledge of what happened. The post did not prove that Epstein had been murdered or that the official finding of suicide was false, but it became another source of skepticism because someone outside the official public-information process appeared to know not only that Epstein was dead, but details about the attempted resuscitation, before the rest of the country had even been told that he had died.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci!protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2612epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/jeffrey-epstein-and-his-clandestine-business-in-africa-part-2--75847729
What is confirmed, however, is that Epstein was already operating in shadowy financial arenas, including his lucrative role as a consultant for Steven Hoffenberg’s Towers Financial Corporation, a Ponzi scheme where Epstein earned $25,000 a month and received a $2 million loan. The warlord connection remains unproven but symbolically aligns with the trajectory of a man who, from the start, was willing to skirt moral boundaries, exploit opaque systems, and surround himself with power—whether in Wall Street boardrooms or, allegedly, among those who carved fortunes out of bloodshed in Africa.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Records show Jeffrey Epstein’s requests for multiple passports, travels to Africa and Middle East - ABC News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75847729Mon, 19 Oct 2026 04:10:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJeffrey Epstein’s early financial career is cloaked in mystery, with only fragments of fact piercing through layers of rumor and myth. After leaving Bear Stearns in 1981, he founded Intercontinental Assets Group Inc., a consulting firm where he...
What is confirmed, however, is that Epstein was already operating in shadowy financial arenas, including his lucrative role as a consultant for Steven Hoffenberg’s Towers Financial Corporation, a Ponzi scheme where Epstein earned $25,000 a month and received a $2 million loan. The warlord connection remains unproven but symbolically aligns with the trajectory of a man who, from the start, was willing to skirt moral boundaries, exploit opaque systems, and surround himself with power—whether in Wall Street boardrooms or, allegedly, among those who carved fortunes out of bloodshed in Africa.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Records show Jeffrey Epstein’s requests for multiple passports, travels to Africa and Middle East - ABC News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>792epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/jeffrey-epstein-and-his-clandestine-business-in-africa-part-1--75847730
What is confirmed, however, is that Epstein was already operating in shadowy financial arenas, including his lucrative role as a consultant for Steven Hoffenberg’s Towers Financial Corporation, a Ponzi scheme where Epstein earned $25,000 a month and received a $2 million loan. The warlord connection remains unproven but symbolically aligns with the trajectory of a man who, from the start, was willing to skirt moral boundaries, exploit opaque systems, and surround himself with power—whether in Wall Street boardrooms or, allegedly, among those who carved fortunes out of bloodshed in Africa.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Records show Jeffrey Epstein’s requests for multiple passports, travels to Africa and Middle East - ABC News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75847730Mon, 19 Oct 2026 02:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJeffrey Epstein’s early financial career is cloaked in mystery, with only fragments of fact piercing through layers of rumor and myth. After leaving Bear Stearns in 1981, he founded Intercontinental Assets Group Inc., a consulting firm where he...
What is confirmed, however, is that Epstein was already operating in shadowy financial arenas, including his lucrative role as a consultant for Steven Hoffenberg’s Towers Financial Corporation, a Ponzi scheme where Epstein earned $25,000 a month and received a $2 million loan. The warlord connection remains unproven but symbolically aligns with the trajectory of a man who, from the start, was willing to skirt moral boundaries, exploit opaque systems, and surround himself with power—whether in Wall Street boardrooms or, allegedly, among those who carved fortunes out of bloodshed in Africa.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Records show Jeffrey Epstein’s requests for multiple passports, travels to Africa and Middle East - ABC News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>749epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcript-day-4-part-15-10-18-26--75847196

The state also spent a significant portion of the day strengthening the forensic connection between Robinson and the physical evidence. Investigators testified that Robinson’s DNA was found on numerous portions of the rifle recovered near Utah Valley University, including the stock, grips, trigger area, bolt and barrel, as well as on ammunition associated with the weapon. An ATF analysis also linked a rotary engraving tool recovered from Robinson’s residence to markings found on cartridge cases, supporting the prosecution’s allegation that ammunition had been engraved before the shooting. At the same time, the forensic evidence was not absolute across the board: investigators could not conclusively determine that the bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Kirk’s autopsy had been fired from the recovered rifle. By the end of the fourth day, however, prosecutors had combined Robinson’s alleged admissions, Twiggs’ account, the handwritten note, surveillance evidence and extensive DNA testimony into their clearest presentation yet of why they believe Robinson was the shooter.







to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75847196Mon, 19 Oct 2026 00:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay four of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing, held July 9, centered on some of the prosecution’s most consequential evidence yet, including a recorded interview with Robinson’s former roommate and romantic partner, Lance Twiggs. In the interview,...

The state also spent a significant portion of the day strengthening the forensic connection between Robinson and the physical evidence. Investigators testified that Robinson’s DNA was found on numerous portions of the rifle recovered near Utah Valley University, including the stock, grips, trigger area, bolt and barrel, as well as on ammunition associated with the weapon. An ATF analysis also linked a rotary engraving tool recovered from Robinson’s residence to markings found on cartridge cases, supporting the prosecution’s allegation that ammunition had been engraved before the shooting. At the same time, the forensic evidence was not absolute across the board: investigators could not conclusively determine that the bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Kirk’s autopsy had been fired from the recovered rifle. By the end of the fourth day, however, prosecutors had combined Robinson’s alleged admissions, Twiggs’ account, the handwritten note, surveillance evidence and extensive DNA testimony into their clearest presentation yet of why they believe Robinson was the shooter.







to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>860breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcript-day-4-part-14-10-18-26--75845892

The state also spent a significant portion of the day strengthening the forensic connection between Robinson and the physical evidence. Investigators testified that Robinson’s DNA was found on numerous portions of the rifle recovered near Utah Valley University, including the stock, grips, trigger area, bolt and barrel, as well as on ammunition associated with the weapon. An ATF analysis also linked a rotary engraving tool recovered from Robinson’s residence to markings found on cartridge cases, supporting the prosecution’s allegation that ammunition had been engraved before the shooting. At the same time, the forensic evidence was not absolute across the board: investigators could not conclusively determine that the bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Kirk’s autopsy had been fired from the recovered rifle. By the end of the fourth day, however, prosecutors had combined Robinson’s alleged admissions, Twiggs’ account, the handwritten note, surveillance evidence and extensive DNA testimony into their clearest presentation yet of why they believe Robinson was the shooter.







to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75845892Sun, 18 Oct 2026 22:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay four of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing, held July 9, centered on some of the prosecution’s most consequential evidence yet, including a recorded interview with Robinson’s former roommate and romantic partner, Lance Twiggs. In the interview,...

The state also spent a significant portion of the day strengthening the forensic connection between Robinson and the physical evidence. Investigators testified that Robinson’s DNA was found on numerous portions of the rifle recovered near Utah Valley University, including the stock, grips, trigger area, bolt and barrel, as well as on ammunition associated with the weapon. An ATF analysis also linked a rotary engraving tool recovered from Robinson’s residence to markings found on cartridge cases, supporting the prosecution’s allegation that ammunition had been engraved before the shooting. At the same time, the forensic evidence was not absolute across the board: investigators could not conclusively determine that the bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Kirk’s autopsy had been fired from the recovered rifle. By the end of the fourth day, however, prosecutors had combined Robinson’s alleged admissions, Twiggs’ account, the handwritten note, surveillance evidence and extensive DNA testimony into their clearest presentation yet of why they believe Robinson was the shooter.







to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>747breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/new-mexico-and-the-epstein-related-lawsuit-filed-against-the-doj-part-6-10-18-26--75845890
The lawsuit also rests on New Mexico’s claim that federal prosecutors effectively told state investigators to stand down in 2019 while the Southern District of New York pursued its own Epstein investigation, with an understanding that relevant information would later be shared. According to former New Mexico Attorney General Hector Balderas, that information was never provided, and the state says repeated requests in 2026 produced little of investigative value, including a 31-page production made up largely of already-public or heavily redacted material. New Mexico is asking a federal court to declare DOJ’s refusal unlawful and order the department to provide access to the unredacted records, arguing that the continued withholding has directly hampered an active criminal investigation into what happened at Zorro Ranch and who, beyond Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, may have been involved.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.295266.1.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75845890Sun, 18 Oct 2026 20:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciNew Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez sued the U.S. Department of Justice on August 5, 2026, accusing the federal government of obstructing the state’s renewed criminal investigation into alleged abuse, trafficking and other crimes connected to...
The lawsuit also rests on New Mexico’s claim that federal prosecutors effectively told state investigators to stand down in 2019 while the Southern District of New York pursued its own Epstein investigation, with an understanding that relevant information would later be shared. According to former New Mexico Attorney General Hector Balderas, that information was never provided, and the state says repeated requests in 2026 produced little of investigative value, including a 31-page production made up largely of already-public or heavily redacted material. New Mexico is asking a federal court to declare DOJ’s refusal unlawful and order the department to provide access to the unredacted records, arguing that the continued withholding has directly hampered an active criminal investigation into what happened at Zorro Ranch and who, beyond Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, may have been involved.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.295266.1.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>720epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/new-mexico-and-the-epstein-related-lawsuit-filed-against-the-doj-part-5-10-18-26--75845889
The lawsuit also rests on New Mexico’s claim that federal prosecutors effectively told state investigators to stand down in 2019 while the Southern District of New York pursued its own Epstein investigation, with an understanding that relevant information would later be shared. According to former New Mexico Attorney General Hector Balderas, that information was never provided, and the state says repeated requests in 2026 produced little of investigative value, including a 31-page production made up largely of already-public or heavily redacted material. New Mexico is asking a federal court to declare DOJ’s refusal unlawful and order the department to provide access to the unredacted records, arguing that the continued withholding has directly hampered an active criminal investigation into what happened at Zorro Ranch and who, beyond Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, may have been involved.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.295266.1.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75845889Sun, 18 Oct 2026 18:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciNew Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez sued the U.S. Department of Justice on August 5, 2026, accusing the federal government of obstructing the state’s renewed criminal investigation into alleged abuse, trafficking and other crimes connected to...
The lawsuit also rests on New Mexico’s claim that federal prosecutors effectively told state investigators to stand down in 2019 while the Southern District of New York pursued its own Epstein investigation, with an understanding that relevant information would later be shared. According to former New Mexico Attorney General Hector Balderas, that information was never provided, and the state says repeated requests in 2026 produced little of investigative value, including a 31-page production made up largely of already-public or heavily redacted material. New Mexico is asking a federal court to declare DOJ’s refusal unlawful and order the department to provide access to the unredacted records, arguing that the continued withholding has directly hampered an active criminal investigation into what happened at Zorro Ranch and who, beyond Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, may have been involved.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.295266.1.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>697epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/new-mexico-and-the-epstein-related-lawsuit-filed-against-the-doj-part-4-10-18-26--75845891
The lawsuit also rests on New Mexico’s claim that federal prosecutors effectively told state investigators to stand down in 2019 while the Southern District of New York pursued its own Epstein investigation, with an understanding that relevant information would later be shared. According to former New Mexico Attorney General Hector Balderas, that information was never provided, and the state says repeated requests in 2026 produced little of investigative value, including a 31-page production made up largely of already-public or heavily redacted material. New Mexico is asking a federal court to declare DOJ’s refusal unlawful and order the department to provide access to the unredacted records, arguing that the continued withholding has directly hampered an active criminal investigation into what happened at Zorro Ranch and who, beyond Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, may have been involved.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.295266.1.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75845891Sun, 18 Oct 2026 16:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciNew Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez sued the U.S. Department of Justice on August 5, 2026, accusing the federal government of obstructing the state’s renewed criminal investigation into alleged abuse, trafficking and other crimes connected to...
The lawsuit also rests on New Mexico’s claim that federal prosecutors effectively told state investigators to stand down in 2019 while the Southern District of New York pursued its own Epstein investigation, with an understanding that relevant information would later be shared. According to former New Mexico Attorney General Hector Balderas, that information was never provided, and the state says repeated requests in 2026 produced little of investigative value, including a 31-page production made up largely of already-public or heavily redacted material. New Mexico is asking a federal court to declare DOJ’s refusal unlawful and order the department to provide access to the unredacted records, arguing that the continued withholding has directly hampered an active criminal investigation into what happened at Zorro Ranch and who, beyond Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, may have been involved.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.295266.1.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>642epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jane-doe-2-and-her-interview-with-marie-villafana-10-18-26--75842549

Jane Doe #2 also told investigators that she was not isolated, explaining that other young girls were present or discussed openly, reinforcing the impression that this was an organized and recurring operation rather than a one-off incident. She described how Epstein’s behavior was methodical and rehearsed, suggesting long-standing patterns rather than impulsive misconduct.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:


.gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.403.3.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75842549Sun, 18 Oct 2026 14:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJane Doe #2’s 2007 statement to Marie Villafaña and federal investigators described a pattern of recruitment, abuse, and normalization inside Jeffrey Epstein’s operation, beginning when she was a minor. She said she was introduced to Epstein under the...

Jane Doe #2 also told investigators that she was not isolated, explaining that other young girls were present or discussed openly, reinforcing the impression that this was an organized and recurring operation rather than a one-off incident. She described how Epstein’s behavior was methodical and rehearsed, suggesting long-standing patterns rather than impulsive misconduct.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:


.gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.403.3.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3308epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jean-luc-brunel-and-the-still-unexplained-circumstances-around-his-death-10-18-26--75839736
What makes the official narrative so difficult for many people to accept without reservation is the repetition. Epstein died by hanging in federal custody after a cascade of failures involving staffing, inmate checks, surveillance and housing arrangements. Less than three years later, Brunel—another key Epstein associate facing the possibility of exposing more of that same world—was also found hanging in jail before trial. French authorities treated Brunel’s death as suicide, just as U.S. authorities concluded Epstein killed himself, and there is no publicly established evidence proving either man was murdered. But skepticism is not irrational when two central figures connected to the same trafficking network die in custody before they can testify, particularly after the documented institutional failures surrounding Epstein’s death. The official explanation may ultimately be correct, but the overlap is significant enough that simply repeating “suicide” does not resolve the deeper questions about what safeguards failed, what evidence was lost and who benefited from both men never reaching a courtroom.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75839736Sun, 18 Oct 2026 12:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe circumstances surrounding Jean-Luc Brunel’s death are extraordinarily difficult to separate from the unanswered questions surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s own death. Brunel was one of the most important figures in Epstein’s modeling-world network and...
What makes the official narrative so difficult for many people to accept without reservation is the repetition. Epstein died by hanging in federal custody after a cascade of failures involving staffing, inmate checks, surveillance and housing arrangements. Less than three years later, Brunel—another key Epstein associate facing the possibility of exposing more of that same world—was also found hanging in jail before trial. French authorities treated Brunel’s death as suicide, just as U.S. authorities concluded Epstein killed himself, and there is no publicly established evidence proving either man was murdered. But skepticism is not irrational when two central figures connected to the same trafficking network die in custody before they can testify, particularly after the documented institutional failures surrounding Epstein’s death. The official explanation may ultimately be correct, but the overlap is significant enough that simply repeating “suicide” does not resolve the deeper questions about what safeguards failed, what evidence was lost and who benefited from both men never reaching a courtroom.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3287epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-brad-edwards-talks-courtney-wild-and-blasts-prince-andrew-10-18-26--75839735
Edwards was far less charitable when discussing Prince Andrew. He blasted Andrew for continuing to associate with Epstein after Epstein had already been convicted and registered as a sex offender, arguing that there was no reasonable explanation for maintaining that friendship once Epstein’s record was public. Edwards said Andrew would likely have to live with ridicule for years because of how badly he handled the scandal and because of the obvious questions raised by his post-conviction contact with Epstein. He also rejected the idea that Andrew’s civil settlement with Virginia Giuffre settled the underlying questions about what he knew or did, stressing that a settlement was not the same thing as being tested under oath at trial. Edwards’ broader criticism was simple: Andrew had access to information about Epstein’s world, had remained close to him at a time when his criminal history was already known, and had never provided the kind of full, sworn accounting that survivors and their lawyers had been demanding.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75839735Sun, 18 Oct 2026 10:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBrad Edwards repeatedly held Courtney Wild up as one of the clearest examples of how badly Jeffrey Epstein’s victims were failed by the federal justice system. Wild was only 14 when she was drawn into Epstein’s Palm Beach operation, and Edwards...
Edwards was far less charitable when discussing Prince Andrew. He blasted Andrew for continuing to associate with Epstein after Epstein had already been convicted and registered as a sex offender, arguing that there was no reasonable explanation for maintaining that friendship once Epstein’s record was public. Edwards said Andrew would likely have to live with ridicule for years because of how badly he handled the scandal and because of the obvious questions raised by his post-conviction contact with Epstein. He also rejected the idea that Andrew’s civil settlement with Virginia Giuffre settled the underlying questions about what he knew or did, stressing that a settlement was not the same thing as being tested under oath at trial. Edwards’ broader criticism was simple: Andrew had access to information about Epstein’s world, had remained close to him at a time when his criminal history was already known, and had never provided the kind of full, sworn accounting that survivors and their lawyers had been demanding.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3671epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-brad-edwards-and-the-affidavit-part-5-7-10-18-26--75839734
Edwards further argues that the government’s resistance to producing these materials undermines transparency and prevents the court from fully evaluating the extent of the misconduct. He emphasizes that the victims cannot meaningfully litigate their CVRA claims without access to evidence exclusively in the government’s possession, particularly records documenting decision-making within the U.S. Attorney’s Office and DOJ headquarters. The affidavit frames the document production not as a fishing expedition, but as a narrowly tailored request necessary to expose how Epstein was granted extraordinary leniency, how victims were intentionally misled, and how federal officials acted with impunity while shielding both Epstein and themselves from accountability.



to contact me:


bobbycacpucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.265.1_1.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75839734Sun, 18 Oct 2026 08:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe affidavit submitted by attorney Bradley J. Edwards in the Southern District of Florida lays out a detailed argument for why the U.S. government should be compelled to produce documents related to the federal handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case....
Edwards further argues that the government’s resistance to producing these materials undermines transparency and prevents the court from fully evaluating the extent of the misconduct. He emphasizes that the victims cannot meaningfully litigate their CVRA claims without access to evidence exclusively in the government’s possession, particularly records documenting decision-making within the U.S. Attorney’s Office and DOJ headquarters. The affidavit frames the document production not as a fishing expedition, but as a narrowly tailored request necessary to expose how Epstein was granted extraordinary leniency, how victims were intentionally misled, and how federal officials acted with impunity while shielding both Epstein and themselves from accountability.



to contact me:


bobbycacpucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.265.1_1.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2741breakingnewsdaily,crime,murder,murderino,mystery,newsreports,podcast,podcastersofinstagram,serialkiller,serialkillers,ssdgm,truecrime,truecrimeaddict,truecrimecommunity,truecrimefan,truecrimejunkie,truecrimeobsessed,truecrimepodcast,unsolved,unsolvedmysteriestruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-brad-edwards-and-the-affidavit-part-1-4-10-18-26--75839733
Edwards further argues that the government’s resistance to producing these materials undermines transparency and prevents the court from fully evaluating the extent of the misconduct. He emphasizes that the victims cannot meaningfully litigate their CVRA claims without access to evidence exclusively in the government’s possession, particularly records documenting decision-making within the U.S. Attorney’s Office and DOJ headquarters. The affidavit frames the document production not as a fishing expedition, but as a narrowly tailored request necessary to expose how Epstein was granted extraordinary leniency, how victims were intentionally misled, and how federal officials acted with impunity while shielding both Epstein and themselves from accountability.



to contact me:


bobbycacpucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.265.1_1.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75839733Sun, 18 Oct 2026 06:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciThe affidavit submitted by attorney Bradley J. Edwards in the Southern District of Florida lays out a detailed argument for why the U.S. government should be compelled to produce documents related to the federal handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case....
Edwards further argues that the government’s resistance to producing these materials undermines transparency and prevents the court from fully evaluating the extent of the misconduct. He emphasizes that the victims cannot meaningfully litigate their CVRA claims without access to evidence exclusively in the government’s possession, particularly records documenting decision-making within the U.S. Attorney’s Office and DOJ headquarters. The affidavit frames the document production not as a fishing expedition, but as a narrowly tailored request necessary to expose how Epstein was granted extraordinary leniency, how victims were intentionally misled, and how federal officials acted with impunity while shielding both Epstein and themselves from accountability.



to contact me:


bobbycacpucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.265.1_1.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2972breakingnewsdaily,crime,murder,murderino,mystery,newsreports,podcast,podcastersofinstagram,serialkiller,serialkillers,ssdgm,truecrime,truecrimeaddict,truecrimecommunity,truecrimefan,truecrimejunkie,truecrimeobsessed,truecrimepodcast,unsolved,unsolvedmysteriestruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/why-didn-t-authorities-press-larry-visoski-for-more-answers-part-2--75838611
The larger unanswered question was why the government never provided a comprehensive public accounting of what Visoski knew and whether investigators seriously explored the possibility that his knowledge went beyond innocent employment. Epstein’s criminal enterprise depended heavily on private aviation to connect his secluded properties, transport employees and guests, and maintain the mobility that allowed him to operate across multiple jurisdictions. A chief pilot serving him for decades would have been positioned to observe recurring passengers, unusual travel patterns, scheduling practices and the employees responsible for coordinating Epstein’s movements, even if he never directly witnessed sexual abuse. Prosecutors would have needed evidence of criminal intent to charge Visoski, and proximity alone was never enough, but that did not lessen the need for exhaustive scrutiny. His role ultimately highlighted one of the enduring failures of the Epstein investigation: the public learned an enormous amount about the machinery surrounding Epstein, yet still received remarkably few answers about what his longest-serving insiders knew, what they told investigators and why so little accountability extended beyond Epstein and Maxwell.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75838611Sun, 18 Oct 2026 04:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciLarry Visoski was far more than Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime pilot. For nearly three decades, he occupied a critical logistical position inside Epstein’s world, flying him between New York, Palm Beach, New Mexico, the Virgin Islands and other...
The larger unanswered question was why the government never provided a comprehensive public accounting of what Visoski knew and whether investigators seriously explored the possibility that his knowledge went beyond innocent employment. Epstein’s criminal enterprise depended heavily on private aviation to connect his secluded properties, transport employees and guests, and maintain the mobility that allowed him to operate across multiple jurisdictions. A chief pilot serving him for decades would have been positioned to observe recurring passengers, unusual travel patterns, scheduling practices and the employees responsible for coordinating Epstein’s movements, even if he never directly witnessed sexual abuse. Prosecutors would have needed evidence of criminal intent to charge Visoski, and proximity alone was never enough, but that did not lessen the need for exhaustive scrutiny. His role ultimately highlighted one of the enduring failures of the Epstein investigation: the public learned an enormous amount about the machinery surrounding Epstein, yet still received remarkably few answers about what his longest-serving insiders knew, what they told investigators and why so little accountability extended beyond Epstein and Maxwell.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>897epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/why-didn-t-authorities-press-larry-visoski-for-more-answers-part-1--75838610
The larger unanswered question was why the government never provided a comprehensive public accounting of what Visoski knew and whether investigators seriously explored the possibility that his knowledge went beyond innocent employment. Epstein’s criminal enterprise depended heavily on private aviation to connect his secluded properties, transport employees and guests, and maintain the mobility that allowed him to operate across multiple jurisdictions. A chief pilot serving him for decades would have been positioned to observe recurring passengers, unusual travel patterns, scheduling practices and the employees responsible for coordinating Epstein’s movements, even if he never directly witnessed sexual abuse. Prosecutors would have needed evidence of criminal intent to charge Visoski, and proximity alone was never enough, but that did not lessen the need for exhaustive scrutiny. His role ultimately highlighted one of the enduring failures of the Epstein investigation: the public learned an enormous amount about the machinery surrounding Epstein, yet still received remarkably few answers about what his longest-serving insiders knew, what they told investigators and why so little accountability extended beyond Epstein and Maxwell.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75838610Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciLarry Visoski was far more than Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime pilot. For nearly three decades, he occupied a critical logistical position inside Epstein’s world, flying him between New York, Palm Beach, New Mexico, the Virgin Islands and other...
The larger unanswered question was why the government never provided a comprehensive public accounting of what Visoski knew and whether investigators seriously explored the possibility that his knowledge went beyond innocent employment. Epstein’s criminal enterprise depended heavily on private aviation to connect his secluded properties, transport employees and guests, and maintain the mobility that allowed him to operate across multiple jurisdictions. A chief pilot serving him for decades would have been positioned to observe recurring passengers, unusual travel patterns, scheduling practices and the employees responsible for coordinating Epstein’s movements, even if he never directly witnessed sexual abuse. Prosecutors would have needed evidence of criminal intent to charge Visoski, and proximity alone was never enough, but that did not lessen the need for exhaustive scrutiny. His role ultimately highlighted one of the enduring failures of the Epstein investigation: the public learned an enormous amount about the machinery surrounding Epstein, yet still received remarkably few answers about what his longest-serving insiders knew, what they told investigators and why so little accountability extended beyond Epstein and Maxwell.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>769epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcript-day-4-part-13-10-17-26--75837680

The state also spent a significant portion of the day strengthening the forensic connection between Robinson and the physical evidence. Investigators testified that Robinson’s DNA was found on numerous portions of the rifle recovered near Utah Valley University, including the stock, grips, trigger area, bolt and barrel, as well as on ammunition associated with the weapon. An ATF analysis also linked a rotary engraving tool recovered from Robinson’s residence to markings found on cartridge cases, supporting the prosecution’s allegation that ammunition had been engraved before the shooting. At the same time, the forensic evidence was not absolute across the board: investigators could not conclusively determine that the bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Kirk’s autopsy had been fired from the recovered rifle. By the end of the fourth day, however, prosecutors had combined Robinson’s alleged admissions, Twiggs’ account, the handwritten note, surveillance evidence and extensive DNA testimony into their clearest presentation yet of why they believe Robinson was the shooter.







to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75837680Sun, 18 Oct 2026 00:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay four of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing, held July 9, centered on some of the prosecution’s most consequential evidence yet, including a recorded interview with Robinson’s former roommate and romantic partner, Lance Twiggs. In the interview,...

The state also spent a significant portion of the day strengthening the forensic connection between Robinson and the physical evidence. Investigators testified that Robinson’s DNA was found on numerous portions of the rifle recovered near Utah Valley University, including the stock, grips, trigger area, bolt and barrel, as well as on ammunition associated with the weapon. An ATF analysis also linked a rotary engraving tool recovered from Robinson’s residence to markings found on cartridge cases, supporting the prosecution’s allegation that ammunition had been engraved before the shooting. At the same time, the forensic evidence was not absolute across the board: investigators could not conclusively determine that the bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Kirk’s autopsy had been fired from the recovered rifle. By the end of the fourth day, however, prosecutors had combined Robinson’s alleged admissions, Twiggs’ account, the handwritten note, surveillance evidence and extensive DNA testimony into their clearest presentation yet of why they believe Robinson was the shooter.







to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>664breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-epstein-wall-street-records-act-takes-aim-at-the-banks-10-17-26--75837685
The legislation arrived alongside renewed scrutiny of former Barclays CEO Jes Staley and the bank's handling of his relationship with Epstein. Warren accused Barclays of “dodging responsibility” after the bank responded to congressional questions by arguing that Staley had concealed the true nature of his relationship with Epstein and that significant information only emerged after his 2021 resignation. Staley had previously worked at JPMorgan, where he developed a close relationship with Epstein, and was ultimately banned from the British financial sector after regulators determined that he had misrepresented that relationship. Warren argued that the Barclays episode demonstrated why voluntary corporate accountability was insufficient and why regulators should be compelled to investigate the broader financial network surrounding Epstein and the executives who helped keep him connected to the banking system.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

US lawmakers unveil bill to hold Wall Street’s ‘Epstein-connected’ bosses to account | Banking | The Guardian

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75837685Sat, 17 Oct 2026 22:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciA bipartisan group of lawmakers led by Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Rep. Robert Garcia, with Republican Rep. Thomas Massie also backing the measure, introduced the Epstein Wall Street Records Act, legislation aimed at forcing federal regulators to...
The legislation arrived alongside renewed scrutiny of former Barclays CEO Jes Staley and the bank's handling of his relationship with Epstein. Warren accused Barclays of “dodging responsibility” after the bank responded to congressional questions by arguing that Staley had concealed the true nature of his relationship with Epstein and that significant information only emerged after his 2021 resignation. Staley had previously worked at JPMorgan, where he developed a close relationship with Epstein, and was ultimately banned from the British financial sector after regulators determined that he had misrepresented that relationship. Warren argued that the Barclays episode demonstrated why voluntary corporate accountability was insufficient and why regulators should be compelled to investigate the broader financial network surrounding Epstein and the executives who helped keep him connected to the banking system.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

US lawmakers unveil bill to hold Wall Street’s ‘Epstein-connected’ bosses to account | Banking | The Guardian

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>670epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/new-mexico-and-the-epstein-related-lawsuit-filed-against-the-doj-part-3-10-17-26--75838609
The lawsuit also rests on New Mexico’s claim that federal prosecutors effectively told state investigators to stand down in 2019 while the Southern District of New York pursued its own Epstein investigation, with an understanding that relevant information would later be shared. According to former New Mexico Attorney General Hector Balderas, that information was never provided, and the state says repeated requests in 2026 produced little of investigative value, including a 31-page production made up largely of already-public or heavily redacted material. New Mexico is asking a federal court to declare DOJ’s refusal unlawful and order the department to provide access to the unredacted records, arguing that the continued withholding has directly hampered an active criminal investigation into what happened at Zorro Ranch and who, beyond Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, may have been involved.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.295266.1.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75838609Sat, 17 Oct 2026 20:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciNew Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez sued the U.S. Department of Justice on August 5, 2026, accusing the federal government of obstructing the state’s renewed criminal investigation into alleged abuse, trafficking and other crimes connected to...
The lawsuit also rests on New Mexico’s claim that federal prosecutors effectively told state investigators to stand down in 2019 while the Southern District of New York pursued its own Epstein investigation, with an understanding that relevant information would later be shared. According to former New Mexico Attorney General Hector Balderas, that information was never provided, and the state says repeated requests in 2026 produced little of investigative value, including a 31-page production made up largely of already-public or heavily redacted material. New Mexico is asking a federal court to declare DOJ’s refusal unlawful and order the department to provide access to the unredacted records, arguing that the continued withholding has directly hampered an active criminal investigation into what happened at Zorro Ranch and who, beyond Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, may have been involved.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.295266.1.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>698epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/new-mexico-and-the-epstein-related-lawsuit-filed-against-the-doj-part-2-10-17-26--75837681
The lawsuit also rests on New Mexico’s claim that federal prosecutors effectively told state investigators to stand down in 2019 while the Southern District of New York pursued its own Epstein investigation, with an understanding that relevant information would later be shared. According to former New Mexico Attorney General Hector Balderas, that information was never provided, and the state says repeated requests in 2026 produced little of investigative value, including a 31-page production made up largely of already-public or heavily redacted material. New Mexico is asking a federal court to declare DOJ’s refusal unlawful and order the department to provide access to the unredacted records, arguing that the continued withholding has directly hampered an active criminal investigation into what happened at Zorro Ranch and who, beyond Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, may have been involved.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.295266.1.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75837681Sat, 17 Oct 2026 18:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciNew Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez sued the U.S. Department of Justice on August 5, 2026, accusing the federal government of obstructing the state’s renewed criminal investigation into alleged abuse, trafficking and other crimes connected to...
The lawsuit also rests on New Mexico’s claim that federal prosecutors effectively told state investigators to stand down in 2019 while the Southern District of New York pursued its own Epstein investigation, with an understanding that relevant information would later be shared. According to former New Mexico Attorney General Hector Balderas, that information was never provided, and the state says repeated requests in 2026 produced little of investigative value, including a 31-page production made up largely of already-public or heavily redacted material. New Mexico is asking a federal court to declare DOJ’s refusal unlawful and order the department to provide access to the unredacted records, arguing that the continued withholding has directly hampered an active criminal investigation into what happened at Zorro Ranch and who, beyond Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, may have been involved.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.295266.1.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>698epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/new-mexico-and-the-epstein-related-lawsuit-filed-against-the-doj-part-1-10-17-26--75837679
The lawsuit also rests on New Mexico’s claim that federal prosecutors effectively told state investigators to stand down in 2019 while the Southern District of New York pursued its own Epstein investigation, with an understanding that relevant information would later be shared. According to former New Mexico Attorney General Hector Balderas, that information was never provided, and the state says repeated requests in 2026 produced little of investigative value, including a 31-page production made up largely of already-public or heavily redacted material. New Mexico is asking a federal court to declare DOJ’s refusal unlawful and order the department to provide access to the unredacted records, arguing that the continued withholding has directly hampered an active criminal investigation into what happened at Zorro Ranch and who, beyond Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, may have been involved.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.295266.1.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75837679Sat, 17 Oct 2026 16:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciNew Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez sued the U.S. Department of Justice on August 5, 2026, accusing the federal government of obstructing the state’s renewed criminal investigation into alleged abuse, trafficking and other crimes connected to...
The lawsuit also rests on New Mexico’s claim that federal prosecutors effectively told state investigators to stand down in 2019 while the Southern District of New York pursued its own Epstein investigation, with an understanding that relevant information would later be shared. According to former New Mexico Attorney General Hector Balderas, that information was never provided, and the state says repeated requests in 2026 produced little of investigative value, including a 31-page production made up largely of already-public or heavily redacted material. New Mexico is asking a federal court to declare DOJ’s refusal unlawful and order the department to provide access to the unredacted records, arguing that the continued withholding has directly hampered an active criminal investigation into what happened at Zorro Ranch and who, beyond Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, may have been involved.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.295266.1.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>696epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-day-three-of-the-chad-daybell-trial-10-17-26--75828111
Fremont County Lt. Joe Powell later testified about the decision to exhume Tammy Daybell’s body and the December 2019 exhumation itself, with jurors seeing photographs of her grave being opened and an autopsy photograph. Powell explained that Daybell had originally told investigators Tammy had been sick, suffered a coughing fit and vomited before going to bed and dying, while the defense emphasized that Tammy had used herbal remedies and other alternative treatments and questioned aspects of the investigation, including the fact that investigators had not reviewed her death certificate before obtaining the exhumation order and had not notified her children beforehand. The day concluded with FBI tactical specialist Nicole Heideman beginning testimony about the enormous volume of cellphone evidence in the investigation. She walked jurors through numerous phone numbers, aliases and accounts associated with Lori, Chad and Alex Cox, identifying several numbers investigators considered particularly important and beginning the process of connecting those devices to the people and events at the center of the case. Taken together, day three moved the prosecution from the discovery of the bodies into Daybell’s conduct during that discovery, Tammy’s suspicious death and the digital evidence prosecutors intended to use to tie the alleged conspiracy together.



to contact me:


bobbyacpucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75828111Sat, 17 Oct 2026 14:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay three of Chad Daybell’s trial on April 15, 2024, focused heavily on his behavior as investigators searched his property and discovered the bodies of JJ Vallow and Tylee Ryan. Madison County Chief Deputy Vince Kaaiakamanu authenticated a recorded...
Fremont County Lt. Joe Powell later testified about the decision to exhume Tammy Daybell’s body and the December 2019 exhumation itself, with jurors seeing photographs of her grave being opened and an autopsy photograph. Powell explained that Daybell had originally told investigators Tammy had been sick, suffered a coughing fit and vomited before going to bed and dying, while the defense emphasized that Tammy had used herbal remedies and other alternative treatments and questioned aspects of the investigation, including the fact that investigators had not reviewed her death certificate before obtaining the exhumation order and had not notified her children beforehand. The day concluded with FBI tactical specialist Nicole Heideman beginning testimony about the enormous volume of cellphone evidence in the investigation. She walked jurors through numerous phone numbers, aliases and accounts associated with Lori, Chad and Alex Cox, identifying several numbers investigators considered particularly important and beginning the process of connecting those devices to the people and events at the center of the case. Taken together, day three moved the prosecution from the discovery of the bodies into Daybell’s conduct during that discovery, Tammy’s suspicious death and the digital evidence prosecutors intended to use to tie the alleged conspiracy together.



to contact me:


bobbyacpucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3286chaddaybell,chaddaybelltrial,courtroomdrama,cultcrime,daybelltrial,doomsdaycouple,doomsdaymom,idahomurders,idahotruecrime,jjandtylee,justiceforjj,justicefortammy,justicefortylee,lorivallow,lorivallowdaybell,murdertrial,tammydaybell,truecrime,truecrimecommunity,truecrimepodcasttruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-detective-hermosillo-gives-testimony-during-the-chad-daybell-trial-10-17-26--75828110
Hermosillo’s most consequential testimony centered on the June 9, 2020 search of Chad Daybell’s property, where investigators found the remains of both children. He testified that while officers executed the warrant, he noticed Daybell sitting in his vehicle and repeatedly looking toward the area near a pond behind the house, which drew Hermosillo’s attention. FBI evidence recovery personnel then began excavating a section beneath a tree near that area, where Hermosillo said investigators smelled decomposition before uncovering a small body wrapped in black and white plastic, later identified as JJ. Investigators also searched a fire pit and pet cemetery area, where Tylee’s badly burned and dismembered remains were recovered. Hermosillo’s testimony connected the physical search of Daybell’s property to the earlier missing-person investigation and gave jurors a firsthand account of how the children were ultimately found buried on land belonging to the man prosecutors accused of helping orchestrate their deaths.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75828110Sat, 17 Oct 2026 12:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciRexburg Police Detective Ray Hermosillo testified about how the investigation into Lori Vallow and Chad Daybell evolved from a welfare check for JJ Vallow into a search for two missing children and ultimately a murder investigation. Hermosillo told...
Hermosillo’s most consequential testimony centered on the June 9, 2020 search of Chad Daybell’s property, where investigators found the remains of both children. He testified that while officers executed the warrant, he noticed Daybell sitting in his vehicle and repeatedly looking toward the area near a pond behind the house, which drew Hermosillo’s attention. FBI evidence recovery personnel then began excavating a section beneath a tree near that area, where Hermosillo said investigators smelled decomposition before uncovering a small body wrapped in black and white plastic, later identified as JJ. Investigators also searched a fire pit and pet cemetery area, where Tylee’s badly burned and dismembered remains were recovered. Hermosillo’s testimony connected the physical search of Daybell’s property to the earlier missing-person investigation and gave jurors a firsthand account of how the children were ultimately found buried on land belonging to the man prosecutors accused of helping orchestrate their deaths.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2230chaddaybell,chaddaybelltrial,courtroomdrama,cultcrime,daybelltrial,doomsdaycouple,doomsdaymom,idahomurders,idahotruecrime,jjandtylee,justiceforjj,justicefortammy,justicefortylee,lorivallow,lorivallowdaybell,murdertrial,tammydaybell,truecrime,truecrimecommunity,truecrimepodcasttruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-opening-statements-during-day-1-of-the-chad-daybell-trial-10-16-26--75827926
Defense attorney John Prior presented a sharply different picture, arguing that the evidence would show Lori Vallow and her brother Alex Cox were far more directly connected to the killings than Daybell. Prior portrayed Lori as manipulative and emphasized that Cox had repeatedly been on Daybell’s property, including around the periods when Tylee and JJ disappeared. He told jurors that forensic experts would testify that Daybell’s DNA and hair were not found on the children’s remains and that defense experts would challenge the state’s conclusion that Tammy Daybell had been murdered, pointing instead to her health problems and the possibility of a natural death. Prior urged jurors to focus on evidence rather than the disturbing beliefs, speculation and assumptions surrounding the case, arguing that Daybell’s unusual religious views did not prove murder. From the opening moments of the trial, the battle lines were clear: prosecutors depicted Daybell as the central figure who helped create the ideology and circumstances that led to three deaths, while the defense sought to shift responsibility toward Lori Vallow and Alex Cox and force the state to prove Daybell had personally participated in the killings.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75827926Sat, 17 Oct 2026 10:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciProsecutors opened Chad Daybell’s murder trial by portraying him as the architect of a conspiracy driven by sex, money and power. Madison County Prosecutor Rob Wood told jurors that Daybell had gone from a seemingly ordinary religious author and...
Defense attorney John Prior presented a sharply different picture, arguing that the evidence would show Lori Vallow and her brother Alex Cox were far more directly connected to the killings than Daybell. Prior portrayed Lori as manipulative and emphasized that Cox had repeatedly been on Daybell’s property, including around the periods when Tylee and JJ disappeared. He told jurors that forensic experts would testify that Daybell’s DNA and hair were not found on the children’s remains and that defense experts would challenge the state’s conclusion that Tammy Daybell had been murdered, pointing instead to her health problems and the possibility of a natural death. Prior urged jurors to focus on evidence rather than the disturbing beliefs, speculation and assumptions surrounding the case, arguing that Daybell’s unusual religious views did not prove murder. From the opening moments of the trial, the battle lines were clear: prosecutors depicted Daybell as the central figure who helped create the ideology and circumstances that led to three deaths, while the defense sought to shift responsibility toward Lori Vallow and Alex Cox and force the state to prove Daybell had personally participated in the killings.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3414chaddaybell,chaddaybelltrial,courtroomdrama,cultcrime,daybelltrial,doomsdaycouple,doomsdaymom,idahomurders,idahotruecrime,jjandtylee,justiceforjj,justicefortammy,justicefortylee,lorivallow,lorivallowdaybell,murdertrial,tammydaybell,truecrime,truecrimecommunity,truecrimepodcasttruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jury-selection-during-the-chad-daybell-trial-part-2-10-17-26--75827967
By the end of the initial voir dire process, the court had assembled a pool of 57 qualified prospective jurors, from which prosecutors and Daybell’s defense exercised their remaining challenges. On April 9, the final jury of 12 members and six alternates was selected, completing more than a week of screening designed to find people who could decide the case solely on evidence presented in court. The process was particularly important because Daybell faced three counts of first-degree murder and conspiracy charges connected to the deaths of his first wife, Tammy Daybell, and Lori Vallow Daybell’s children, 7-year-old Joshua “JJ” Vallow and 16-year-old Tylee Ryan. With the jury seated, the case moved into opening statements and testimony, beginning the evidentiary phase of a trial that ultimately lasted nearly two months.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75827967Sat, 17 Oct 2026 08:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJury selection in Chad Daybell’s capital murder trial began on April 1, 2024, at the Ada County Courthouse in Boise, where the case had been moved because of concerns about finding an impartial jury in eastern Idaho. Judge Steven Boyce and attorneys...
By the end of the initial voir dire process, the court had assembled a pool of 57 qualified prospective jurors, from which prosecutors and Daybell’s defense exercised their remaining challenges. On April 9, the final jury of 12 members and six alternates was selected, completing more than a week of screening designed to find people who could decide the case solely on evidence presented in court. The process was particularly important because Daybell faced three counts of first-degree murder and conspiracy charges connected to the deaths of his first wife, Tammy Daybell, and Lori Vallow Daybell’s children, 7-year-old Joshua “JJ” Vallow and 16-year-old Tylee Ryan. With the jury seated, the case moved into opening statements and testimony, beginning the evidentiary phase of a trial that ultimately lasted nearly two months.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3299chaddaybelltrial,daybell.,daybelltrial,doomsdaycouple,doomsdaymom,idahomurders,idahotruecrime,jjandtylee,justiceforjj,justicefortammy,justicefortylee,lorivallow,lorivallowdaybell,no,references #chaddaybell,tammydaybell,tik,tok,truecrime,truecrimecommunitytruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jury-selection-during-the-chad-daybell-trial-part-1-10-16-26--75827968
By the end of the initial voir dire process, the court had assembled a pool of 57 qualified prospective jurors, from which prosecutors and Daybell’s defense exercised their remaining challenges. On April 9, the final jury of 12 members and six alternates was selected, completing more than a week of screening designed to find people who could decide the case solely on evidence presented in court. The process was particularly important because Daybell faced three counts of first-degree murder and conspiracy charges connected to the deaths of his first wife, Tammy Daybell, and Lori Vallow Daybell’s children, 7-year-old Joshua “JJ” Vallow and 16-year-old Tylee Ryan. With the jury seated, the case moved into opening statements and testimony, beginning the evidentiary phase of a trial that ultimately lasted nearly two months.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75827968Sat, 17 Oct 2026 06:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciJury selection in Chad Daybell’s capital murder trial began on April 1, 2024, at the Ada County Courthouse in Boise, where the case had been moved because of concerns about finding an impartial jury in eastern Idaho. Judge Steven Boyce and attorneys...
By the end of the initial voir dire process, the court had assembled a pool of 57 qualified prospective jurors, from which prosecutors and Daybell’s defense exercised their remaining challenges. On April 9, the final jury of 12 members and six alternates was selected, completing more than a week of screening designed to find people who could decide the case solely on evidence presented in court. The process was particularly important because Daybell faced three counts of first-degree murder and conspiracy charges connected to the deaths of his first wife, Tammy Daybell, and Lori Vallow Daybell’s children, 7-year-old Joshua “JJ” Vallow and 16-year-old Tylee Ryan. With the jury seated, the case moved into opening statements and testimony, beginning the evidentiary phase of a trial that ultimately lasted nearly two months.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>4176chaddaybelltrial,daybell.,daybelltrial,doomsdaycouple,doomsdaymom,idahomurders,idahotruecrime,jjandtylee,justiceforjj,justicefortammy,justicefortylee,lorivallow,lorivallowdaybell,no,references #chaddaybell,tammydaybell,tik,tok,truecrime,truecrimecommunitytruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-disappearance-of-dylan-rounds--75827369
Rounds disappeared on May 28, 2022, shortly after speaking with his grandmother from the Lucin area, beginning a massive search that eventually turned into a murder investigation. James Brenner, who had been living near Rounds’ farm, was later charged with killing him and, as part of a plea agreement in 2024, led investigators to Rounds’ remains in a remote section of western Utah. Brenner subsequently pleaded guilty to murder and was sentenced to prison. Rounds’ family later created Dylan’s Legacy in his memory, both to preserve the story of the ambitious young farmer he had been and to support other families dealing with missing-person and homicide cases.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75827369Sat, 17 Oct 2026 04:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDylan Rounds was a 19-year-old farmer from Idaho who had spent years working toward the goal of building a farming operation of his own in the remote desert around Lucin, Utah. Born in 2002 and raised around agriculture, Rounds had been described by...
Rounds disappeared on May 28, 2022, shortly after speaking with his grandmother from the Lucin area, beginning a massive search that eventually turned into a murder investigation. James Brenner, who had been living near Rounds’ farm, was later charged with killing him and, as part of a plea agreement in 2024, led investigators to Rounds’ remains in a remote section of western Utah. Brenner subsequently pleaded guilty to murder and was sentenced to prison. Rounds’ family later created Dylan’s Legacy in his memory, both to preserve the story of the ambitious young farmer he had been and to support other families dealing with missing-person and homicide cases.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1419breakingnews,buzzfeedunsolvedtruecrime,news,truecrime,truecrimeaddict,truecrimeallthetime,truecrimeandchill,truecrimebooks,truecrimecommunity,truecrimefan,truecrimegarage,truecrimejunkie,truecrimeobsessed,truecrimepodcast,truecrimepodcasts,truecrimereport,truecrimes,truecrimestoriestruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/former-homicide-prosecutor-matt-murphy-talks-rex-heuermann--75827309
Investigators had nevertheless developed a substantial circumstantial and forensic case against Heuermann. A male hair recovered from the burlap surrounding Megan Waterman’s remains had been linked to Heuermann through mitochondrial DNA testing, while female hairs recovered with the victims had been linked to his wife, whose whereabouts investigators had examined during the periods when the women disappeared. Prosecutors had also relied heavily on cellphone evidence, alleging that Heuermann’s personal phone, burner phones connected to the crimes and victims’ phones had traveled through overlapping areas and communicated through the same cellular towers. Murphy said that phone evidence had been especially compelling and argued that the overall picture suggested a calculating offender who had actively thought about how to conceal his identity and avoid detection for years.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75827309Sat, 17 Oct 2026 02:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciVeteran homicide prosecutor Matt Murphy, who was not involved in the Gilgo Beach investigation, believed Rex Heuermann may have taken deliberate precautions to avoid leaving DNA behind during the killings. Murphy compared the suspected methods to...
Investigators had nevertheless developed a substantial circumstantial and forensic case against Heuermann. A male hair recovered from the burlap surrounding Megan Waterman’s remains had been linked to Heuermann through mitochondrial DNA testing, while female hairs recovered with the victims had been linked to his wife, whose whereabouts investigators had examined during the periods when the women disappeared. Prosecutors had also relied heavily on cellphone evidence, alleging that Heuermann’s personal phone, burner phones connected to the crimes and victims’ phones had traveled through overlapping areas and communicated through the same cellular towers. Murphy said that phone evidence had been especially compelling and argued that the overall picture suggested a calculating offender who had actively thought about how to conceal his identity and avoid detection for years.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>625breakingnews,buzzfeedunsolvedtruecrime,news,truecrime,truecrimeaddict,truecrimeallthetime,truecrimeandchill,truecrimebooks,truecrimecommunity,truecrimefan,truecrimegarage,truecrimejunkie,truecrimeobsessed,truecrimepodcast,truecrimepodcasts,truecrimereport,truecrimes,truecrimestoriestruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcript-day-4-part-12-10-16-26--75814086

The state also spent a significant portion of the day strengthening the forensic connection between Robinson and the physical evidence. Investigators testified that Robinson’s DNA was found on numerous portions of the rifle recovered near Utah Valley University, including the stock, grips, trigger area, bolt and barrel, as well as on ammunition associated with the weapon. An ATF analysis also linked a rotary engraving tool recovered from Robinson’s residence to markings found on cartridge cases, supporting the prosecution’s allegation that ammunition had been engraved before the shooting. At the same time, the forensic evidence was not absolute across the board: investigators could not conclusively determine that the bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Kirk’s autopsy had been fired from the recovered rifle. By the end of the fourth day, however, prosecutors had combined Robinson’s alleged admissions, Twiggs’ account, the handwritten note, surveillance evidence and extensive DNA testimony into their clearest presentation yet of why they believe Robinson was the shooter.







to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75814086Sat, 17 Oct 2026 00:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay four of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing, held July 9, centered on some of the prosecution’s most consequential evidence yet, including a recorded interview with Robinson’s former roommate and romantic partner, Lance Twiggs. In the interview,...

The state also spent a significant portion of the day strengthening the forensic connection between Robinson and the physical evidence. Investigators testified that Robinson’s DNA was found on numerous portions of the rifle recovered near Utah Valley University, including the stock, grips, trigger area, bolt and barrel, as well as on ammunition associated with the weapon. An ATF analysis also linked a rotary engraving tool recovered from Robinson’s residence to markings found on cartridge cases, supporting the prosecution’s allegation that ammunition had been engraved before the shooting. At the same time, the forensic evidence was not absolute across the board: investigators could not conclusively determine that the bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Kirk’s autopsy had been fired from the recovered rifle. By the end of the fourth day, however, prosecutors had combined Robinson’s alleged admissions, Twiggs’ account, the handwritten note, surveillance evidence and extensive DNA testimony into their clearest presentation yet of why they believe Robinson was the shooter.







to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>640breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/federal-officials-deny-diddy-was-injured-in-a-prison-fight-10-16-26--75827889
The incident added another controversy to Combs’ incarceration at Fort Dix, where he is serving a 50-month federal sentence after being convicted on two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution while being acquitted of the more serious racketeering and sex-trafficking charges. His time at the facility has already generated scrutiny over alleged contraband, special meals, massages, cellphone access and other claimed privileges, and he has spent time in a special housing unit following disciplinary issues. His projected release date has also been pushed to March 2, 2028. The central development in Deadline’s latest report, however, is that the most sensational explanation for Combs’ hospitalization—a prison fight with Coke—is now being explicitly rejected by federal authorities, while officials still have not provided an alternative explanation for how Combs suffered the head injury that required outside medical treatment.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Diddy's Prison Head Injury Mystery: Feds Deny Fight With Drug Lord Was Cause

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75827889Fri, 16 Oct 2026 22:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDeadline reported that the mystery surrounding Sean “Diddy” Combs’ recent head injury at FCI Fort Dix deepened after the Federal Bureau of Prisons flatly denied reports that he was injured during a fight with convicted Jamaican drug trafficker...
The incident added another controversy to Combs’ incarceration at Fort Dix, where he is serving a 50-month federal sentence after being convicted on two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution while being acquitted of the more serious racketeering and sex-trafficking charges. His time at the facility has already generated scrutiny over alleged contraband, special meals, massages, cellphone access and other claimed privileges, and he has spent time in a special housing unit following disciplinary issues. His projected release date has also been pushed to March 2, 2028. The central development in Deadline’s latest report, however, is that the most sensational explanation for Combs’ hospitalization—a prison fight with Coke—is now being explicitly rejected by federal authorities, while officials still have not provided an alternative explanation for how Combs suffered the head injury that required outside medical treatment.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Diddy's Prison Head Injury Mystery: Feds Deny Fight With Drug Lord Was Cause

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>756badboy,breakingnews,combsarrest,diddy,diddyarrest,diddyarrestnews,diddynews,diddynewsupdate,diddyupdate,epstein,jeffreyepstein,news,pdiddy,pdiddynews,puffdaddy,puffdaddynews,seancombs,seancombsarrest,seancombsarrested,truecrimetruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-federal-charges-swept-aside-by-epstein-s-sweetheart-deal-part-6-10-16-26--75814084
That indictment was never filed because the federal case was instead resolved through the non-prosecution agreement negotiated by Alex Acosta’s office and Epstein’s attorneys. Epstein avoided federal prosecution, pleaded guilty to two state prostitution-related charges, served a notoriously lenient sentence with extensive work release, and received federal protection that also extended to unnamed potential co-conspirators. The abandoned prosecution memorandum is therefore one of the clearest measures of what prosecutors believed they could prove before the case was bargained away: this was not an investigation that collapsed because investigators found nothing. Federal prosecutors had assembled victims, evidence and a detailed charging plan, only for that plan to be replaced by one of the most controversial plea arrangements in modern Justice Department history. DOJ’s own later review concluded that Acosta exercised poor judgment in resolving the investigation through the NPA, even though it stopped short of finding professional misconduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

EFTA01718407.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75814084Fri, 16 Oct 2026 20:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBefore Jeffrey Epstein received his extraordinary 2007 non-prosecution agreement, federal prosecutors in South Florida had prepared a sweeping case against him that could have resulted in dozens of federal charges involving the sexual exploitation and...
That indictment was never filed because the federal case was instead resolved through the non-prosecution agreement negotiated by Alex Acosta’s office and Epstein’s attorneys. Epstein avoided federal prosecution, pleaded guilty to two state prostitution-related charges, served a notoriously lenient sentence with extensive work release, and received federal protection that also extended to unnamed potential co-conspirators. The abandoned prosecution memorandum is therefore one of the clearest measures of what prosecutors believed they could prove before the case was bargained away: this was not an investigation that collapsed because investigators found nothing. Federal prosecutors had assembled victims, evidence and a detailed charging plan, only for that plan to be replaced by one of the most controversial plea arrangements in modern Justice Department history. DOJ’s own later review concluded that Acosta exercised poor judgment in resolving the investigation through the NPA, even though it stopped short of finding professional misconduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

EFTA01718407.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>741epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-federal-charges-swept-aside-by-epstein-s-sweetheart-deal-part-5-10-16-26--75814085
That indictment was never filed because the federal case was instead resolved through the non-prosecution agreement negotiated by Alex Acosta’s office and Epstein’s attorneys. Epstein avoided federal prosecution, pleaded guilty to two state prostitution-related charges, served a notoriously lenient sentence with extensive work release, and received federal protection that also extended to unnamed potential co-conspirators. The abandoned prosecution memorandum is therefore one of the clearest measures of what prosecutors believed they could prove before the case was bargained away: this was not an investigation that collapsed because investigators found nothing. Federal prosecutors had assembled victims, evidence and a detailed charging plan, only for that plan to be replaced by one of the most controversial plea arrangements in modern Justice Department history. DOJ’s own later review concluded that Acosta exercised poor judgment in resolving the investigation through the NPA, even though it stopped short of finding professional misconduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

EFTA01718407.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75814085Fri, 16 Oct 2026 18:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBefore Jeffrey Epstein received his extraordinary 2007 non-prosecution agreement, federal prosecutors in South Florida had prepared a sweeping case against him that could have resulted in dozens of federal charges involving the sexual exploitation and...
That indictment was never filed because the federal case was instead resolved through the non-prosecution agreement negotiated by Alex Acosta’s office and Epstein’s attorneys. Epstein avoided federal prosecution, pleaded guilty to two state prostitution-related charges, served a notoriously lenient sentence with extensive work release, and received federal protection that also extended to unnamed potential co-conspirators. The abandoned prosecution memorandum is therefore one of the clearest measures of what prosecutors believed they could prove before the case was bargained away: this was not an investigation that collapsed because investigators found nothing. Federal prosecutors had assembled victims, evidence and a detailed charging plan, only for that plan to be replaced by one of the most controversial plea arrangements in modern Justice Department history. DOJ’s own later review concluded that Acosta exercised poor judgment in resolving the investigation through the NPA, even though it stopped short of finding professional misconduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

EFTA01718407.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>753epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/revisiting-the-fdle-investigation-into-jeffrey-epstein-part-2-10-16-26--75814089
The investigation drew criticism because many of the most obvious avenues for a public-corruption probe were either unavailable, narrowly examined, or never aggressively pursued. Visitor logs had been destroyed, survivor allegations were not fully reconstructed through independent records, and officials responsible for Epstein’s unusual privileges were largely allowed to explain their own decisions without the kind of compulsory process normally associated with a serious corruption investigation. Ashley Moody publicly questioned how Epstein had obtained work release and said the state would determine who authorized it, but the inquiry closed without establishing meaningful accountability for an arrangement that later records showed may have allowed Epstein to continue exploiting women while technically in custody. Subsequent federal disclosures and testimony raised additional questions about sexual encounters, possible benefits provided to law-enforcement personnel, and Epstein’s continued ability to operate during incarceration. Taken together, the record showed an investigation that documented extraordinary favoritism but stopped short of determining how the system failed so completely or holding anyone responsible for creating and maintaining it.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75814089Fri, 16 Oct 2026 16:23:01 +0000Bobby CapucciJeffrey Epstein’s work-release arrangement in Palm Beach County allowed him extraordinary freedom while he was supposedly serving a jail sentence for sex offenses, including long workdays at the Florida Science Foundation, private transportation, home...
The investigation drew criticism because many of the most obvious avenues for a public-corruption probe were either unavailable, narrowly examined, or never aggressively pursued. Visitor logs had been destroyed, survivor allegations were not fully reconstructed through independent records, and officials responsible for Epstein’s unusual privileges were largely allowed to explain their own decisions without the kind of compulsory process normally associated with a serious corruption investigation. Ashley Moody publicly questioned how Epstein had obtained work release and said the state would determine who authorized it, but the inquiry closed without establishing meaningful accountability for an arrangement that later records showed may have allowed Epstein to continue exploiting women while technically in custody. Subsequent federal disclosures and testimony raised additional questions about sexual encounters, possible benefits provided to law-enforcement personnel, and Epstein’s continued ability to operate during incarceration. Taken together, the record showed an investigation that documented extraordinary favoritism but stopped short of determining how the system failed so completely or holding anyone responsible for creating and maintaining it.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1290epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/revisiting-the-fdle-investigation-into-jeffrey-epstein-part-1-10-16-26--75814088
The investigation drew criticism because many of the most obvious avenues for a public-corruption probe were either unavailable, narrowly examined, or never aggressively pursued. Visitor logs had been destroyed, survivor allegations were not fully reconstructed through independent records, and officials responsible for Epstein’s unusual privileges were largely allowed to explain their own decisions without the kind of compulsory process normally associated with a serious corruption investigation. Ashley Moody publicly questioned how Epstein had obtained work release and said the state would determine who authorized it, but the inquiry closed without establishing meaningful accountability for an arrangement that later records showed may have allowed Epstein to continue exploiting women while technically in custody. Subsequent federal disclosures and testimony raised additional questions about sexual encounters, possible benefits provided to law-enforcement personnel, and Epstein’s continued ability to operate during incarceration. Taken together, the record showed an investigation that documented extraordinary favoritism but stopped short of determining how the system failed so completely or holding anyone responsible for creating and maintaining it.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75814088Fri, 16 Oct 2026 14:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJeffrey Epstein’s work-release arrangement in Palm Beach County allowed him extraordinary freedom while he was supposedly serving a jail sentence for sex offenses, including long workdays at the Florida Science Foundation, private transportation, home...
The investigation drew criticism because many of the most obvious avenues for a public-corruption probe were either unavailable, narrowly examined, or never aggressively pursued. Visitor logs had been destroyed, survivor allegations were not fully reconstructed through independent records, and officials responsible for Epstein’s unusual privileges were largely allowed to explain their own decisions without the kind of compulsory process normally associated with a serious corruption investigation. Ashley Moody publicly questioned how Epstein had obtained work release and said the state would determine who authorized it, but the inquiry closed without establishing meaningful accountability for an arrangement that later records showed may have allowed Epstein to continue exploiting women while technically in custody. Subsequent federal disclosures and testimony raised additional questions about sexual encounters, possible benefits provided to law-enforcement personnel, and Epstein’s continued ability to operate during incarceration. Taken together, the record showed an investigation that documented extraordinary favoritism but stopped short of determining how the system failed so completely or holding anyone responsible for creating and maintaining it.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>712epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/questions-grow-over-ashley-moody-s-handling-of-the-epstein-investigation-10-16-26--75814083
Now, as Moody campaigns for a full Senate term in Florida, Drop Site reports that donors with documented ties to Epstein have poured at least $50,000 into her political operation. Douglas Band gave $14,000, Stephen Schwarzman $12,000, John Catsimatidis $10,000, and Marc Rowan and Ronald Lauder $7,000 each. The article also points to Moody’s later record on Epstein-related transparency: in 2025 she cast the deciding vote to table an amendment that would have required the Justice Department to release Epstein-related documents, and in 2026 she defended Todd Blanche during his confirmation hearing despite criticism of DOJ’s handling of the files. The broader picture is politically damaging because Moody once oversaw a state investigation that found no wrongdoing in one of the most notorious aspects of Epstein’s lenient treatment, and she is now receiving substantial support from wealthy figures who themselves appear in the broader Epstein record.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

After Ashley Moody Epstein Probe, Donors Linked to Him Poured Money Into her Senate Campaign

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75814083Fri, 16 Oct 2026 12:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciAs Florida attorney general, Ashley Moody opened an investigation in August 2019 into the Palm Beach County work-release arrangement that allowed Jeffrey Epstein to leave jail for up to 16 hours a day while serving his sentence. Within days, Moody...
Now, as Moody campaigns for a full Senate term in Florida, Drop Site reports that donors with documented ties to Epstein have poured at least $50,000 into her political operation. Douglas Band gave $14,000, Stephen Schwarzman $12,000, John Catsimatidis $10,000, and Marc Rowan and Ronald Lauder $7,000 each. The article also points to Moody’s later record on Epstein-related transparency: in 2025 she cast the deciding vote to table an amendment that would have required the Justice Department to release Epstein-related documents, and in 2026 she defended Todd Blanche during his confirmation hearing despite criticism of DOJ’s handling of the files. The broader picture is politically damaging because Moody once oversaw a state investigation that found no wrongdoing in one of the most notorious aspects of Epstein’s lenient treatment, and she is now receiving substantial support from wealthy figures who themselves appear in the broader Epstein record.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

After Ashley Moody Epstein Probe, Donors Linked to Him Poured Money Into her Senate Campaign

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>756epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-murder-of-gabby-petito-and-confusion-early-on-10-16-26--75809657
That environment became even more chaotic after Petito’s body was found and Laundrie disappeared. Every reported sighting of Laundrie generated new theories, many of which proved false, while internet users repeatedly accused innocent people of helping him hide or of knowing more than they had disclosed. The case showed both the usefulness and the danger of crowdsourced true-crime attention: public tips and online footage did help investigators reconstruct parts of the couple’s movements, but the same ecosystem also produced misinformation, harassment and confident accusations unsupported by evidence. By the time Laundrie’s remains and notebook were recovered, the actual case had become surrounded by a parallel universe of rumors that often had little connection to what law enforcement could prove.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75809657Fri, 16 Oct 2026 10:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn the days and weeks after Gabby Petito disappeared in 2021, the case became a magnet for conspiracy theories, amateur sleuthing and rumors that spread far faster than investigators could confirm or debunk them. Social media users dissected every...
That environment became even more chaotic after Petito’s body was found and Laundrie disappeared. Every reported sighting of Laundrie generated new theories, many of which proved false, while internet users repeatedly accused innocent people of helping him hide or of knowing more than they had disclosed. The case showed both the usefulness and the danger of crowdsourced true-crime attention: public tips and online footage did help investigators reconstruct parts of the couple’s movements, but the same ecosystem also produced misinformation, harassment and confident accusations unsupported by evidence. By the time Laundrie’s remains and notebook were recovered, the actual case had become surrounded by a parallel universe of rumors that often had little connection to what law enforcement could prove.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2929brianlaundrie,crimenews,domesticabuseawareness,domesticviolence,fbiinvestigation,floridacrime,gabbypetito,gabbypetitocase,gabbypetitomurder,gabbypetitostory,intimatepartnerviolence,justiceforgabby,justiceforgabbypetito,missingpersons,murdercase,truecrime,truecrimecommunity,truecrimepodcast,vanlifecase,wyomingcrimetruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-what-did-bryan-kohberger-tell-the-police-after-the-arrested-him-10-16-26--75809656
Kohberger’s post-arrest statements therefore became notable more for what he did not say than for any substantive admission. He did not provide a public explanation for the murders, identify a motive, or give police a narrative of what happened inside the King Road house. Once he invoked his constitutional rights, questioning stopped. The remark about whether anyone else had been arrested was repeatedly analyzed by commentators, but standing alone it was ambiguous and was never treated as a confession. The state’s case instead rested on other evidence, including DNA, cellphone data, surveillance video, vehicle evidence and digital records, rather than on anything Kohberger told police after his arrest.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75809656Fri, 16 Oct 2026 08:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciAfter Bryan Kohberger was arrested in Pennsylvania in December 2022, he spoke briefly with police before invoking his right to remain silent and requesting an attorney. According to reporting and later court disclosures, he asked whether anyone else...
Kohberger’s post-arrest statements therefore became notable more for what he did not say than for any substantive admission. He did not provide a public explanation for the murders, identify a motive, or give police a narrative of what happened inside the King Road house. Once he invoked his constitutional rights, questioning stopped. The remark about whether anyone else had been arrested was repeatedly analyzed by commentators, but standing alone it was ambiguous and was never treated as a confession. The state’s case instead rested on other evidence, including DNA, cellphone data, surveillance video, vehicle evidence and digital records, rather than on anything Kohberger told police after his arrest.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2658bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-diddy-and-the-case-for-his-innocence-at-trial-10-15-26--75809655

Furthermore, the defense has contested the prosecution's use of a 2016 hotel surveillance video showing Combs assaulting then-girlfriend Cassie Ventura, arguing that while the footage is disturbing, it does not constitute evidence of a broader criminal conspiracy. They maintain that the incident, though regrettable, was an isolated event and not indicative of a pattern of racketeering activity. The defense also challenged the admissibility and interpretation of this video, asserting that its repeated presentation could prejudice the jury . Despite these efforts, the judge has denied motions for mistrial and has admonished Combs for courtroom behavior, including attempting to communicate with jurors, which the defense claims was misinterpreted . As the trial progresses, the defense continues to argue that the government's case lacks the necessary evidence to prove the existence of a coordinated criminal enterprise under RICO statutes.

In this episode, I make that argument for them.  


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75809655Fri, 16 Oct 2026 06:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciAfter four weeks of trial, Sean "Diddy" Combs's defense team has mounted a vigorous challenge to the federal RICO charges against him, which include allegations of racketeering and sex trafficking. Led by attorney Brian Steel, the defense has sought...

Furthermore, the defense has contested the prosecution's use of a 2016 hotel surveillance video showing Combs assaulting then-girlfriend Cassie Ventura, arguing that while the footage is disturbing, it does not constitute evidence of a broader criminal conspiracy. They maintain that the incident, though regrettable, was an isolated event and not indicative of a pattern of racketeering activity. The defense also challenged the admissibility and interpretation of this video, asserting that its repeated presentation could prejudice the jury . Despite these efforts, the judge has denied motions for mistrial and has admonished Combs for courtroom behavior, including attempting to communicate with jurors, which the defense claims was misinterpreted . As the trial progresses, the defense continues to argue that the government's case lacks the necessary evidence to prove the existence of a coordinated criminal enterprise under RICO statutes.

In this episode, I make that argument for them.  


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3025breakingnews,dailydiddyreport,diddy,diddydiaries,diddynews,diddynewscentral,diddynewsdaily,diddynewsupdates,diddyontrial,diddytrial,diddytrialnews,diddytrialnewsupdate,diddytrialupdates,news,newsupdate,seancombs,seancombsnews,seandiddycombstrial,thetrialofdiddy,truecrimetruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/rachel-morin-and-the-cases-that-look-eerily-similar--75809394
The article drew parallels between Morin’s death and the murders of Chandra Levy, Mollie Tibbetts, Karina Vetrano, Eliza Fletcher and Sydney Sutherland. Each case involved a woman who had been exercising or traveling alone when she was attacked, although the circumstances and relationships between victims and killers differed. Investigators in those cases frequently relied on DNA, surveillance footage, physical evidence or confessions to identify the perpetrators, while the Chandra Levy case ultimately remained unresolved after the prosecution against its original suspect collapsed. The comparison underscored the vulnerability of women using isolated trails and roads and the possibility, which investigators were considering early in the Morin case, that her killer may have been a stranger who targeted her opportunistically rather than someone from her immediate circle.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75809394Fri, 16 Oct 2026 04:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe Fox News article compared the murder of Rachel Morin to several other high-profile cases in which women were attacked while jogging or walking alone, often by strangers. Morin, a 37-year-old mother of five, disappeared on August 5, 2023, while...
The article drew parallels between Morin’s death and the murders of Chandra Levy, Mollie Tibbetts, Karina Vetrano, Eliza Fletcher and Sydney Sutherland. Each case involved a woman who had been exercising or traveling alone when she was attacked, although the circumstances and relationships between victims and killers differed. Investigators in those cases frequently relied on DNA, surveillance footage, physical evidence or confessions to identify the perpetrators, while the Chandra Levy case ultimately remained unresolved after the prosecution against its original suspect collapsed. The comparison underscored the vulnerability of women using isolated trails and roads and the possibility, which investigators were considering early in the Morin case, that her killer may have been a stranger who targeted her opportunistically rather than someone from her immediate circle.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>844breakingnews,coldcase,coldcases,crime,disappeared,missing,missingpeople,missingpersons,murder,news,newsupdate,podcast,talesofthemissing,thosewhohavevanished,truecrime,truecrimecommunity,truecrimepodcast,unsolvedmysteries,unsolvedmystery,vanishedtruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/gone-but-not-forgotten-what-happened-to-daniel-robinson--75809393
The mystery deepened after Robinson’s family hired its own accident reconstruction expert and challenged aspects of the official interpretation of the Jeep. His father, David Robinson, argued that the condition and location of the vehicle did not adequately explain his son’s disappearance and has continued searching the Arizona desert while pressing authorities for a more aggressive investigation. A human skull found during the searches was eventually determined not to belong to Robinson, and despite searches covering more than 70 square miles, his remains have never been located. As of 2026, the Buckeye Police Department still listed the case as open and continued to say it had no evidence establishing foul play. That leaves the fundamental questions unanswered more than five years later: why Robinson abruptly drove away from work, exactly what happened to his Jeep, how he left the crash area without his most important possessions, and why repeated searches have produced virtually no physical trace of him.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75809393Fri, 16 Oct 2026 02:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciDaniel Robinson was a 24-year-old geologist who disappeared on June 23, 2021, after leaving a remote worksite in the desert near Buckeye, Arizona. A coworker was the last known person to see him, watching Robinson drive away in his 2017 Jeep Renegade...
The mystery deepened after Robinson’s family hired its own accident reconstruction expert and challenged aspects of the official interpretation of the Jeep. His father, David Robinson, argued that the condition and location of the vehicle did not adequately explain his son’s disappearance and has continued searching the Arizona desert while pressing authorities for a more aggressive investigation. A human skull found during the searches was eventually determined not to belong to Robinson, and despite searches covering more than 70 square miles, his remains have never been located. As of 2026, the Buckeye Police Department still listed the case as open and continued to say it had no evidence establishing foul play. That leaves the fundamental questions unanswered more than five years later: why Robinson abruptly drove away from work, exactly what happened to his Jeep, how he left the crash area without his most important possessions, and why repeated searches have produced virtually no physical trace of him.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1467breakingnews,dailydiddyreport,diddy,diddydiaries,diddynews,diddynewscentral,diddynewsdaily,diddynewsupdates,diddyontrial,diddytrial,diddytrialnews,diddytrialnewsupdate,diddytrialupdates,news,newsupdate,seancombs,seancombsnews,seandiddycombstrial,thetrialofdiddy,truecrimetruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcript-day-4-part-11-10-14-26--75792797

The state also spent a significant portion of the day strengthening the forensic connection between Robinson and the physical evidence. Investigators testified that Robinson’s DNA was found on numerous portions of the rifle recovered near Utah Valley University, including the stock, grips, trigger area, bolt and barrel, as well as on ammunition associated with the weapon. An ATF analysis also linked a rotary engraving tool recovered from Robinson’s residence to markings found on cartridge cases, supporting the prosecution’s allegation that ammunition had been engraved before the shooting. At the same time, the forensic evidence was not absolute across the board: investigators could not conclusively determine that the bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Kirk’s autopsy had been fired from the recovered rifle. By the end of the fourth day, however, prosecutors had combined Robinson’s alleged admissions, Twiggs’ account, the handwritten note, surveillance evidence and extensive DNA testimony into their clearest presentation yet of why they believe Robinson was the shooter.







to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75792797Fri, 16 Oct 2026 00:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciDay four of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing, held July 9, centered on some of the prosecution’s most consequential evidence yet, including a recorded interview with Robinson’s former roommate and romantic partner, Lance Twiggs. In the interview,...

The state also spent a significant portion of the day strengthening the forensic connection between Robinson and the physical evidence. Investigators testified that Robinson’s DNA was found on numerous portions of the rifle recovered near Utah Valley University, including the stock, grips, trigger area, bolt and barrel, as well as on ammunition associated with the weapon. An ATF analysis also linked a rotary engraving tool recovered from Robinson’s residence to markings found on cartridge cases, supporting the prosecution’s allegation that ammunition had been engraved before the shooting. At the same time, the forensic evidence was not absolute across the board: investigators could not conclusively determine that the bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Kirk’s autopsy had been fired from the recovered rifle. By the end of the fourth day, however, prosecutors had combined Robinson’s alleged admissions, Twiggs’ account, the handwritten note, surveillance evidence and extensive DNA testimony into their clearest presentation yet of why they believe Robinson was the shooter.







to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>701breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/diddy-reportedly-injured-in-altercation-at-fort-dix-10-15-26--75809337
The alleged fight came amid growing scrutiny of reports describing Combs’ lifestyle at Fort Dix, where former inmates claimed he had access to contraband, specially prepared meals, a cell phone, massages and other privileges financed through arrangements involving other prisoners and outside commissary deposits. Combs’ representatives disputed the characterization of his incarceration as luxurious and maintained that much of what had been described amounted to ordinary prison life or unverified rumor. Coke, meanwhile, had been serving a 23-year federal sentence after pleading guilty to drug- and gun-trafficking charges following his extradition from Jamaica. The reported altercation added another layer of controversy to Combs’ incarceration, but the precise circumstances remained unconfirmed by federal prison officials, who declined to discuss an individual inmate’s medical condition or conditions of confinement.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Diddy suffered serious head injury after wild brawl with drug lord over allegations of his lavish lifestyle behind bars, new report claims | Daily Mail Online

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75809337Thu, 15 Oct 2026 22:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciSean “Diddy” Combs reportedly suffered a serious head injury during an altercation with fellow FCI Fort Dix inmate Christopher “Dudus” Coke, the former Jamaican gang leader who headed the Shower Posse. According to sources cited by TMZ and...
The alleged fight came amid growing scrutiny of reports describing Combs’ lifestyle at Fort Dix, where former inmates claimed he had access to contraband, specially prepared meals, a cell phone, massages and other privileges financed through arrangements involving other prisoners and outside commissary deposits. Combs’ representatives disputed the characterization of his incarceration as luxurious and maintained that much of what had been described amounted to ordinary prison life or unverified rumor. Coke, meanwhile, had been serving a 23-year federal sentence after pleading guilty to drug- and gun-trafficking charges following his extradition from Jamaica. The reported altercation added another layer of controversy to Combs’ incarceration, but the precise circumstances remained unconfirmed by federal prison officials, who declined to discuss an individual inmate’s medical condition or conditions of confinement.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Diddy suffered serious head injury after wild brawl with drug lord over allegations of his lavish lifestyle behind bars, new report claims | Daily Mail Online

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>784breakingnews,dailydiddyreport,diddy,diddydiaries,diddynews,diddynewscentral,diddynewsdaily,diddynewsupdates,diddyontrial,diddytrial,diddytrialnews,diddytrialnewsupdate,diddytrialupdates,news,newsupdate,seancombs,seancombsnews,seandiddycombstrial,thetrialofdiddy,truecrimetruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-federal-charges-swept-aside-by-epstein-s-sweetheart-deal-part-4-10-15-26--75792798
That indictment was never filed because the federal case was instead resolved through the non-prosecution agreement negotiated by Alex Acosta’s office and Epstein’s attorneys. Epstein avoided federal prosecution, pleaded guilty to two state prostitution-related charges, served a notoriously lenient sentence with extensive work release, and received federal protection that also extended to unnamed potential co-conspirators. The abandoned prosecution memorandum is therefore one of the clearest measures of what prosecutors believed they could prove before the case was bargained away: this was not an investigation that collapsed because investigators found nothing. Federal prosecutors had assembled victims, evidence and a detailed charging plan, only for that plan to be replaced by one of the most controversial plea arrangements in modern Justice Department history. DOJ’s own later review concluded that Acosta exercised poor judgment in resolving the investigation through the NPA, even though it stopped short of finding professional misconduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

EFTA01718407.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75792798Thu, 15 Oct 2026 20:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBefore Jeffrey Epstein received his extraordinary 2007 non-prosecution agreement, federal prosecutors in South Florida had prepared a sweeping case against him that could have resulted in dozens of federal charges involving the sexual exploitation and...
That indictment was never filed because the federal case was instead resolved through the non-prosecution agreement negotiated by Alex Acosta’s office and Epstein’s attorneys. Epstein avoided federal prosecution, pleaded guilty to two state prostitution-related charges, served a notoriously lenient sentence with extensive work release, and received federal protection that also extended to unnamed potential co-conspirators. The abandoned prosecution memorandum is therefore one of the clearest measures of what prosecutors believed they could prove before the case was bargained away: this was not an investigation that collapsed because investigators found nothing. Federal prosecutors had assembled victims, evidence and a detailed charging plan, only for that plan to be replaced by one of the most controversial plea arrangements in modern Justice Department history. DOJ’s own later review concluded that Acosta exercised poor judgment in resolving the investigation through the NPA, even though it stopped short of finding professional misconduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

EFTA01718407.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>658epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-federal-charges-swept-aside-by-epstein-s-sweetheart-deal-part-3-10-15-26--75792794
That indictment was never filed because the federal case was instead resolved through the non-prosecution agreement negotiated by Alex Acosta’s office and Epstein’s attorneys. Epstein avoided federal prosecution, pleaded guilty to two state prostitution-related charges, served a notoriously lenient sentence with extensive work release, and received federal protection that also extended to unnamed potential co-conspirators. The abandoned prosecution memorandum is therefore one of the clearest measures of what prosecutors believed they could prove before the case was bargained away: this was not an investigation that collapsed because investigators found nothing. Federal prosecutors had assembled victims, evidence and a detailed charging plan, only for that plan to be replaced by one of the most controversial plea arrangements in modern Justice Department history. DOJ’s own later review concluded that Acosta exercised poor judgment in resolving the investigation through the NPA, even though it stopped short of finding professional misconduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

EFTA01718407.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75792794Thu, 15 Oct 2026 18:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciBefore Jeffrey Epstein received his extraordinary 2007 non-prosecution agreement, federal prosecutors in South Florida had prepared a sweeping case against him that could have resulted in dozens of federal charges involving the sexual exploitation and...
That indictment was never filed because the federal case was instead resolved through the non-prosecution agreement negotiated by Alex Acosta’s office and Epstein’s attorneys. Epstein avoided federal prosecution, pleaded guilty to two state prostitution-related charges, served a notoriously lenient sentence with extensive work release, and received federal protection that also extended to unnamed potential co-conspirators. The abandoned prosecution memorandum is therefore one of the clearest measures of what prosecutors believed they could prove before the case was bargained away: this was not an investigation that collapsed because investigators found nothing. Federal prosecutors had assembled victims, evidence and a detailed charging plan, only for that plan to be replaced by one of the most controversial plea arrangements in modern Justice Department history. DOJ’s own later review concluded that Acosta exercised poor judgment in resolving the investigation through the NPA, even though it stopped short of finding professional misconduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

EFTA01718407.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>707epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-zorro-ranch-touhy-letter-and-the-records-new-mexico-wants-10-15-26--75792799
The letter then laid out specific examples of why New Mexico says it needs the unredacted records. Those include FBI interviews describing victims being brought to Zorro Ranch repeatedly in the late 1990s and early 2000s, a 2019 prosecution memorandum identifying at least four minors and two adults who reported sexual assaults by Epstein, Maxwell and others in New Mexico, and interview notes from a victim who alleged Epstein forcibly raped her at the ranch. Another FBI interview described Maxwell allegedly giving a victim a non-consensual massage before Epstein sexually assaulted her, while other records referenced a professional massage therapist who described sexualized massages at Zorro Ranch, a male complainant who alleged he had been raped there, a 15-year-old girl flown to New Mexico, and a 2019 tip claiming that videos of sexual abuse existed and that two foreign girls were buried on the property. New Mexico made clear that these were allegations requiring investigation, not established facts, but argued that the federal government’s redactions were blocking meaningful follow-up and potentially preventing the identification of additional offenders.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.295266.1.18.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75792799Thu, 15 Oct 2026 16:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciThe document is a May 3, 2026 Touhy request from the New Mexico Department of Justice seeking access to unredacted and unreleased federal records connected to Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Zorro Ranch. New Mexico said it reopened its...
The letter then laid out specific examples of why New Mexico says it needs the unredacted records. Those include FBI interviews describing victims being brought to Zorro Ranch repeatedly in the late 1990s and early 2000s, a 2019 prosecution memorandum identifying at least four minors and two adults who reported sexual assaults by Epstein, Maxwell and others in New Mexico, and interview notes from a victim who alleged Epstein forcibly raped her at the ranch. Another FBI interview described Maxwell allegedly giving a victim a non-consensual massage before Epstein sexually assaulted her, while other records referenced a professional massage therapist who described sexualized massages at Zorro Ranch, a male complainant who alleged he had been raped there, a 15-year-old girl flown to New Mexico, and a 2019 tip claiming that videos of sexual abuse existed and that two foreign girls were buried on the property. New Mexico made clear that these were allegations requiring investigation, not established facts, but argued that the federal government’s redactions were blocking meaningful follow-up and potentially preventing the identification of additional offenders.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.295266.1.18.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>745epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/outrage-grows-after-epstein-files-protester-is-attacked-at-trump-rally-10-15-26--75792796
Trump also addressed the disruption from the stage, claiming without evidence that the protester was a paid activist and mocking her appearance and weight, apparently while misidentifying her as a man. The incident quickly spread across social media and became intertwined with the larger fight over the government’s handling of the Epstein files, since the woman’s protest was specifically demanding their release. The controversy therefore moved beyond a simple rally altercation and became a debate over political violence, free expression, law-enforcement treatment of protesters and whether people demanding Epstein transparency were being treated differently because of the message they were carrying.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

'Where Is the Arrest?': Outrage Erupts After Trump Rally Supporter Punches Female Protester | IBTimes UK

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75792796Thu, 15 Oct 2026 14:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciOutrage erupted after video from a Donald Trump campaign rally in Youngstown, Ohio, showed a male supporter assaulting a female protester who was wearing a “Release the Epstein Files” shirt. The footage showed the man shoving her, pulling her hair,...
Trump also addressed the disruption from the stage, claiming without evidence that the protester was a paid activist and mocking her appearance and weight, apparently while misidentifying her as a man. The incident quickly spread across social media and became intertwined with the larger fight over the government’s handling of the Epstein files, since the woman’s protest was specifically demanding their release. The controversy therefore moved beyond a simple rally altercation and became a debate over political violence, free expression, law-enforcement treatment of protesters and whether people demanding Epstein transparency were being treated differently because of the message they were carrying.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

'Where Is the Arrest?': Outrage Erupts After Trump Rally Supporter Punches Female Protester | IBTimes UK

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>642epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/election-season-comes-for-the-epstein-files-10-15-26--75792795
The real test will come after the election, when the speeches stop and the people demanding our votes actually have the power to act. Voters should remember every promise of transparency and compare those promises against future votes, subpoenas, hearings, investigations, document releases, and efforts to hold government agencies accountable. We cannot undo the sweetheart treatment Epstein received, recover every missed investigative opportunity, or erase the years survivors spent fighting to be heard, but we can insist that the remaining record be exposed and that anyone still subject to lawful investigation be treated according to the evidence rather than wealth, influence, or political allegiance. If politicians are serious about Epstein accountability, they should be willing to pursue uncomfortable facts regardless of where those facts lead. If they are only using Epstein to win an election, that will become obvious once the campaign is over. The voters should be prepared to remember the difference.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75792795Thu, 15 Oct 2026 12:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciNow that the Epstein issue has become a mainstream political weapon, voters should be extremely cautious about politicians who suddenly present themselves as champions of transparency after years of institutional silence and indifference. Jeffrey...
The real test will come after the election, when the speeches stop and the people demanding our votes actually have the power to act. Voters should remember every promise of transparency and compare those promises against future votes, subpoenas, hearings, investigations, document releases, and efforts to hold government agencies accountable. We cannot undo the sweetheart treatment Epstein received, recover every missed investigative opportunity, or erase the years survivors spent fighting to be heard, but we can insist that the remaining record be exposed and that anyone still subject to lawful investigation be treated according to the evidence rather than wealth, influence, or political allegiance. If politicians are serious about Epstein accountability, they should be willing to pursue uncomfortable facts regardless of where those facts lead. If they are only using Epstein to win an election, that will become obvious once the campaign is over. The voters should be prepared to remember the difference.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1298epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-state-replies-to-kohberger-s-objection-to-authentication-record-10-15-26--75789846
In response to the defense's objections, the State details specific items of evidence, such as surveillance footage from properties on Linda Lane and video from Albertson's in Clarkston, Washington, outlining their relevance and the steps taken to authenticate them. Additionally, the State addresses records from Amazon, AT&T, and various financial institutions, emphasizing that Certificates of Authenticity have been obtained or are in the process of being secured. The State maintains that utilizing these evidentiary rules does not infringe upon the defendant's due process rights and is a standard procedure to ensure efficiency and reliability in the admission of evidence.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

032425-States+Reply+to+Defendants+Objection+to+MIL+RE+Self+Authentication+of+Records.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75789846Thu, 15 Oct 2026 10:20:02 +0000Bobby Capucci​In Case Number CR01-24-31665, the State of Idaho has submitted a reply to defendant Bryan C. Kohberger's objection concerning the self-authentication of certain records intended for use at trial. The State aims to admit various pieces of...
In response to the defense's objections, the State details specific items of evidence, such as surveillance footage from properties on Linda Lane and video from Albertson's in Clarkston, Washington, outlining their relevance and the steps taken to authenticate them. Additionally, the State addresses records from Amazon, AT&T, and various financial institutions, emphasizing that Certificates of Authenticity have been obtained or are in the process of being secured. The State maintains that utilizing these evidentiary rules does not infringe upon the defendant's due process rights and is a standard procedure to ensure efficiency and reliability in the admission of evidence.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

032425-States+Reply+to+Defendants+Objection+to+MIL+RE+Self+Authentication+of+Records.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3063bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-battles-the-state-over-alleged-sanctionable-offenses-10-15-26--75789845
Prosecutors rejected that characterization and argued that they had been continuously producing discovery and had complied with Rule 16, accusing the defense of overstating routine discovery disputes in an effort to obtain drastic sanctions. The state maintained that not every expert was required to produce a formal report and that the disclosures already provided were sufficient under Idaho law. The dispute eventually broadened into Kohberger’s attempt to strike the death penalty based in part on what his lawyers called disorganized, incomplete and prejudicial discovery practices. Judge Hippler ultimately sided with the prosecution on the central issue, ruling in April 2025 that Kohberger had not established a discovery or due-process violation serious enough to justify sanctions. He refused to strike the death penalty and declined to impose additional organizational requirements on prosecutors, concluding that the defense had not shown the kind of misconduct necessary for such an extraordinary remedy.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci!protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75789845Thu, 15 Oct 2026 08:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBryan Kohberger’s defense and Idaho prosecutors fought bitterly over whether the state had properly complied with its discovery obligations, especially when it came to expert witnesses. In December 2024, Kohberger’s lawyers asked Judge Steven Hippler...
Prosecutors rejected that characterization and argued that they had been continuously producing discovery and had complied with Rule 16, accusing the defense of overstating routine discovery disputes in an effort to obtain drastic sanctions. The state maintained that not every expert was required to produce a formal report and that the disclosures already provided were sufficient under Idaho law. The dispute eventually broadened into Kohberger’s attempt to strike the death penalty based in part on what his lawyers called disorganized, incomplete and prejudicial discovery practices. Judge Hippler ultimately sided with the prosecution on the central issue, ruling in April 2025 that Kohberger had not established a discovery or due-process violation serious enough to justify sanctions. He refused to strike the death penalty and declined to impose additional organizational requirements on prosecutors, concluding that the defense had not shown the kind of misconduct necessary for such an extraordinary remedy.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci!protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2622bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-why-didn-t-mcc-follow-protocol-after-epstein-died-10-14-26--75789858
The failures continued after Epstein was found unresponsive. Questions arose over scene preservation, evidence handling, the condition and availability of surveillance footage, and the timeliness and completeness of the institutional response. DOJ’s inspector general later documented widespread negligence and misconduct at MCC, including missed rounds, falsified records, inadequate supervision and systemic staffing problems, while concluding that those failures gave Epstein the opportunity to kill himself. The remarkable part of the episode was how many separate safeguards failed simultaneously. A federal inmate of extraordinary public importance, who had already been considered a suicide risk, was left without a cellmate, was not properly checked, was monitored by a compromised camera system and was overseen by officers who later admitted they had not followed required procedures. The result was not simply a failure of one guard or one policy; it was an institutional collapse across virtually every layer that was supposed to prevent exactly this kind of death.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75789858Thu, 15 Oct 2026 06:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciIn the wake of Jeffrey Epstein’s death at the Metropolitan Correctional Center, multiple core federal jail protocols failed at once. Epstein had recently been removed from suicide watch and placed in the Special Housing Unit, where he was supposed to...
The failures continued after Epstein was found unresponsive. Questions arose over scene preservation, evidence handling, the condition and availability of surveillance footage, and the timeliness and completeness of the institutional response. DOJ’s inspector general later documented widespread negligence and misconduct at MCC, including missed rounds, falsified records, inadequate supervision and systemic staffing problems, while concluding that those failures gave Epstein the opportunity to kill himself. The remarkable part of the episode was how many separate safeguards failed simultaneously. A federal inmate of extraordinary public importance, who had already been considered a suicide risk, was left without a cellmate, was not properly checked, was monitored by a compromised camera system and was overseen by officers who later admitted they had not followed required procedures. The result was not simply a failure of one guard or one policy; it was an institutional collapse across virtually every layer that was supposed to prevent exactly this kind of death.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2588epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-the-goncalves-family-and-the-constant-delays--75760091
The hearing had focused on scheduling and the defense’s need for more time to prepare, particularly because prosecutors were seeking the death penalty and the case involved an enormous amount of discovery. Kohberger’s attorneys had argued that a capital case of that magnitude required extensive preparation, while the Goncalves family had viewed the lack of a firm trial date as another setback in their effort to see the case resolved. Their comments had reflected the central tension surrounding the prosecution at that point: the defense had been pressing for enough time to litigate complicated evidentiary and constitutional issues, while the families had been watching the case stretch further into the future with no certainty about when a jury would finally hear it.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75760091Thu, 15 Oct 2026 04:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciKaylee Goncalves’ parents had expressed growing frustration over how long it was taking to set a trial date for Bryan Kohberger, saying they were desperate for the case to move forward. As the case returned to court in early 2024, Steve and Kristi...
The hearing had focused on scheduling and the defense’s need for more time to prepare, particularly because prosecutors were seeking the death penalty and the case involved an enormous amount of discovery. Kohberger’s attorneys had argued that a capital case of that magnitude required extensive preparation, while the Goncalves family had viewed the lack of a firm trial date as another setback in their effort to see the case resolved. Their comments had reflected the central tension surrounding the prosecution at that point: the defense had been pressing for enough time to litigate complicated evidentiary and constitutional issues, while the families had been watching the case stretch further into the future with no certainty about when a jury would finally hear it.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>804bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-the-goncalves-family-and-the-abc-interview--75760090
The Goncalves family had continued expressing frustration with investigators over what they viewed as limited communication and unanswered questions surrounding Kaylee’s final moments. They had also opposed demolition of the King Road house before trial, arguing that the structure itself could have remained important evidence, but the property had nevertheless been torn down in December 2023. At the same time, the family said they were still waiting for a complete digital copy of Kaylee’s phone and felt they had repeatedly been forced to fight for information about their daughter’s death. The new details about Kaylee’s position in the room had only deepened their anguish and reinforced their belief that they still did not have a complete picture of what had happened inside the house.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75760090Thu, 15 Oct 2026 02:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciKaylee Goncalves’ parents revealed that crime-scene photographs showed their daughter had been found in an upright, slumped position against the wall in Madison Mogen’s third-floor bedroom after the November 2022 murders. Kristi Goncalves said the...
The Goncalves family had continued expressing frustration with investigators over what they viewed as limited communication and unanswered questions surrounding Kaylee’s final moments. They had also opposed demolition of the King Road house before trial, arguing that the structure itself could have remained important evidence, but the property had nevertheless been torn down in December 2023. At the same time, the family said they were still waiting for a complete digital copy of Kaylee’s phone and felt they had repeatedly been forced to fight for information about their daughter’s death. The new details about Kaylee’s position in the room had only deepened their anguish and reinforced their belief that they still did not have a complete picture of what had happened inside the house.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>676bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcript-day-4-part-10-10-14-26--75785748

The state also spent a significant portion of the day strengthening the forensic connection between Robinson and the physical evidence. Investigators testified that Robinson’s DNA was found on numerous portions of the rifle recovered near Utah Valley University, including the stock, grips, trigger area, bolt and barrel, as well as on ammunition associated with the weapon. An ATF analysis also linked a rotary engraving tool recovered from Robinson’s residence to markings found on cartridge cases, supporting the prosecution’s allegation that ammunition had been engraved before the shooting. At the same time, the forensic evidence was not absolute across the board: investigators could not conclusively determine that the bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Kirk’s autopsy had been fired from the recovered rifle. By the end of the fourth day, however, prosecutors had combined Robinson’s alleged admissions, Twiggs’ account, the handwritten note, surveillance evidence and extensive DNA testimony into their clearest presentation yet of why they believe Robinson was the shooter.







to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75785748Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciDay four of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing, held July 9, centered on some of the prosecution’s most consequential evidence yet, including a recorded interview with Robinson’s former roommate and romantic partner, Lance Twiggs. In the interview,...

The state also spent a significant portion of the day strengthening the forensic connection between Robinson and the physical evidence. Investigators testified that Robinson’s DNA was found on numerous portions of the rifle recovered near Utah Valley University, including the stock, grips, trigger area, bolt and barrel, as well as on ammunition associated with the weapon. An ATF analysis also linked a rotary engraving tool recovered from Robinson’s residence to markings found on cartridge cases, supporting the prosecution’s allegation that ammunition had been engraved before the shooting. At the same time, the forensic evidence was not absolute across the board: investigators could not conclusively determine that the bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Kirk’s autopsy had been fired from the recovered rifle. By the end of the fourth day, however, prosecutors had combined Robinson’s alleged admissions, Twiggs’ account, the handwritten note, surveillance evidence and extensive DNA testimony into their clearest presentation yet of why they believe Robinson was the shooter.







to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>785breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcript-day-4-part-9-10-14-26--75763609

The state also spent a significant portion of the day strengthening the forensic connection between Robinson and the physical evidence. Investigators testified that Robinson’s DNA was found on numerous portions of the rifle recovered near Utah Valley University, including the stock, grips, trigger area, bolt and barrel, as well as on ammunition associated with the weapon. An ATF analysis also linked a rotary engraving tool recovered from Robinson’s residence to markings found on cartridge cases, supporting the prosecution’s allegation that ammunition had been engraved before the shooting. At the same time, the forensic evidence was not absolute across the board: investigators could not conclusively determine that the bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Kirk’s autopsy had been fired from the recovered rifle. By the end of the fourth day, however, prosecutors had combined Robinson’s alleged admissions, Twiggs’ account, the handwritten note, surveillance evidence and extensive DNA testimony into their clearest presentation yet of why they believe Robinson was the shooter.







to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75763609Wed, 14 Oct 2026 22:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay four of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing, held July 9, centered on some of the prosecution’s most consequential evidence yet, including a recorded interview with Robinson’s former roommate and romantic partner, Lance Twiggs. In the interview,...

The state also spent a significant portion of the day strengthening the forensic connection between Robinson and the physical evidence. Investigators testified that Robinson’s DNA was found on numerous portions of the rifle recovered near Utah Valley University, including the stock, grips, trigger area, bolt and barrel, as well as on ammunition associated with the weapon. An ATF analysis also linked a rotary engraving tool recovered from Robinson’s residence to markings found on cartridge cases, supporting the prosecution’s allegation that ammunition had been engraved before the shooting. At the same time, the forensic evidence was not absolute across the board: investigators could not conclusively determine that the bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Kirk’s autopsy had been fired from the recovered rifle. By the end of the fourth day, however, prosecutors had combined Robinson’s alleged admissions, Twiggs’ account, the handwritten note, surveillance evidence and extensive DNA testimony into their clearest presentation yet of why they believe Robinson was the shooter.







to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>742breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-federal-charges-swept-aside-by-epstein-s-sweetheart-deal-part-2-10-14-26--75785721
That indictment was never filed because the federal case was instead resolved through the non-prosecution agreement negotiated by Alex Acosta’s office and Epstein’s attorneys. Epstein avoided federal prosecution, pleaded guilty to two state prostitution-related charges, served a notoriously lenient sentence with extensive work release, and received federal protection that also extended to unnamed potential co-conspirators. The abandoned prosecution memorandum is therefore one of the clearest measures of what prosecutors believed they could prove before the case was bargained away: this was not an investigation that collapsed because investigators found nothing. Federal prosecutors had assembled victims, evidence and a detailed charging plan, only for that plan to be replaced by one of the most controversial plea arrangements in modern Justice Department history. DOJ’s own later review concluded that Acosta exercised poor judgment in resolving the investigation through the NPA, even though it stopped short of finding professional misconduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

EFTA01718407.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75785721Wed, 14 Oct 2026 20:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBefore Jeffrey Epstein received his extraordinary 2007 non-prosecution agreement, federal prosecutors in South Florida had prepared a sweeping case against him that could have resulted in dozens of federal charges involving the sexual exploitation and...
That indictment was never filed because the federal case was instead resolved through the non-prosecution agreement negotiated by Alex Acosta’s office and Epstein’s attorneys. Epstein avoided federal prosecution, pleaded guilty to two state prostitution-related charges, served a notoriously lenient sentence with extensive work release, and received federal protection that also extended to unnamed potential co-conspirators. The abandoned prosecution memorandum is therefore one of the clearest measures of what prosecutors believed they could prove before the case was bargained away: this was not an investigation that collapsed because investigators found nothing. Federal prosecutors had assembled victims, evidence and a detailed charging plan, only for that plan to be replaced by one of the most controversial plea arrangements in modern Justice Department history. DOJ’s own later review concluded that Acosta exercised poor judgment in resolving the investigation through the NPA, even though it stopped short of finding professional misconduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

EFTA01718407.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>687epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-federal-charges-swept-aside-by-epstein-s-sweetheart-deal-part-1-10-14-26--75763603
That indictment was never filed because the federal case was instead resolved through the non-prosecution agreement negotiated by Alex Acosta’s office and Epstein’s attorneys. Epstein avoided federal prosecution, pleaded guilty to two state prostitution-related charges, served a notoriously lenient sentence with extensive work release, and received federal protection that also extended to unnamed potential co-conspirators. The abandoned prosecution memorandum is therefore one of the clearest measures of what prosecutors believed they could prove before the case was bargained away: this was not an investigation that collapsed because investigators found nothing. Federal prosecutors had assembled victims, evidence and a detailed charging plan, only for that plan to be replaced by one of the most controversial plea arrangements in modern Justice Department history. DOJ’s own later review concluded that Acosta exercised poor judgment in resolving the investigation through the NPA, even though it stopped short of finding professional misconduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

EFTA01718407.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75763603Wed, 14 Oct 2026 18:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBefore Jeffrey Epstein received his extraordinary 2007 non-prosecution agreement, federal prosecutors in South Florida had prepared a sweeping case against him that could have resulted in dozens of federal charges involving the sexual exploitation and...
That indictment was never filed because the federal case was instead resolved through the non-prosecution agreement negotiated by Alex Acosta’s office and Epstein’s attorneys. Epstein avoided federal prosecution, pleaded guilty to two state prostitution-related charges, served a notoriously lenient sentence with extensive work release, and received federal protection that also extended to unnamed potential co-conspirators. The abandoned prosecution memorandum is therefore one of the clearest measures of what prosecutors believed they could prove before the case was bargained away: this was not an investigation that collapsed because investigators found nothing. Federal prosecutors had assembled victims, evidence and a detailed charging plan, only for that plan to be replaced by one of the most controversial plea arrangements in modern Justice Department history. DOJ’s own later review concluded that Acosta exercised poor judgment in resolving the investigation through the NPA, even though it stopped short of finding professional misconduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

EFTA01718407.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>729epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/trump-rally-protester-attacked-while-wearing-release-the-epstein-files-shirt-10-14-26--75763608
Trump then reacted to the heckler from the stage, accusing her without evidence of being a paid protester and mocking her weight. He appeared not to realize the heckler was a woman and repeatedly referred to her as a man while calling protesters “scum” and saying she needed to go on a diet. The fact that she was wearing a shirt demanding release of the Epstein files added another layer to the incident, especially as Trump and his Justice Department continue to face bipartisan pressure over delays in releasing additional Epstein-related records. The episode turned what began as a heckling incident into a broader controversy involving political violence, treatment of protesters and the still-unresolved fight over transparency surrounding the Epstein files.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Heckler in 'Release the Epstein Files' shirt punched at Trump rally in Ohio | Fox News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75763608Wed, 14 Oct 2026 16:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciAt a campaign rally in Youngstown, Ohio, a woman wearing a “Release the Epstein Files” shirt was assaulted by an apparent Trump supporter after drawing attention from the crowd. Video showed the man shoving her, punching her in the face, grabbing her...
Trump then reacted to the heckler from the stage, accusing her without evidence of being a paid protester and mocking her weight. He appeared not to realize the heckler was a woman and repeatedly referred to her as a man while calling protesters “scum” and saying she needed to go on a diet. The fact that she was wearing a shirt demanding release of the Epstein files added another layer to the incident, especially as Trump and his Justice Department continue to face bipartisan pressure over delays in releasing additional Epstein-related records. The episode turned what began as a heckling incident into a broader controversy involving political violence, treatment of protesters and the still-unresolved fight over transparency surrounding the Epstein files.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Heckler in 'Release the Epstein Files' shirt punched at Trump rally in Ohio | Fox News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>702epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/reid-hoffman-pours-millions-into-james-talarico-s-senate-bid-10-13-26--75763605
Hoffman’s relationship with Epstein is the central reason the contribution has become an issue. Epstein-related records show that Hoffman interacted with Epstein years after Epstein’s 2008 conviction, including emails discussing meetings, gifts and possible visits to Epstein properties. Hoffman has said he knew Epstein through fundraising efforts connected to MIT, regrets the relationship, and supports releasing information that could help Epstein’s victims. But contemporaneous emails indicate Hoffman was aware of Epstein’s criminal history while continuing to associate with him, including a 2013 exchange in which Joi Ito said he had discussed Epstein’s jail time with Hoffman. That history now creates an obvious vulnerability for Talarico: a candidate publicly condemning wealthy people connected to Epstein is benefiting from millions of dollars in outside spending financed by one of the billionaires whose own Epstein ties have been repeatedly documented.


to contact me:

bobbyacpucci@protonmail.com



source:

Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein associate Reid Hoffman bankrolling James Talarico's Texas Senate run





















Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75763605Wed, 14 Oct 2026 14:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciLinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman, whose past association with Jeffrey Epstein has drawn renewed scrutiny, has contributed at least $11.5 million to Lone Star Rising PAC, a super PAC supporting Texas Democratic Senate candidate James Talarico....
Hoffman’s relationship with Epstein is the central reason the contribution has become an issue. Epstein-related records show that Hoffman interacted with Epstein years after Epstein’s 2008 conviction, including emails discussing meetings, gifts and possible visits to Epstein properties. Hoffman has said he knew Epstein through fundraising efforts connected to MIT, regrets the relationship, and supports releasing information that could help Epstein’s victims. But contemporaneous emails indicate Hoffman was aware of Epstein’s criminal history while continuing to associate with him, including a 2013 exchange in which Joi Ito said he had discussed Epstein’s jail time with Hoffman. That history now creates an obvious vulnerability for Talarico: a candidate publicly condemning wealthy people connected to Epstein is benefiting from millions of dollars in outside spending financed by one of the billionaires whose own Epstein ties have been repeatedly documented.


to contact me:

bobbyacpucci@protonmail.com



source:

Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein associate Reid Hoffman bankrolling James Talarico's Texas Senate run





















Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>858epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/could-ghislaine-maxwell-finally-turn-on-prince-andrew-10-14-26--75763606
Andrew has continued to face scrutiny over his relationship with Epstein and Maxwell despite denying wrongdoing and settling Virginia Giuffre’s civil lawsuit without admitting liability. He has also resisted efforts by U.S. lawmakers to question him, while Maxwell recently invoked the Fifth Amendment and refused to answer congressional questions about Epstein and his associates. The central issue is whether Maxwell’s silence will hold if she decides cooperation offers her the only meaningful path to relief. For Andrew, the risk is obvious: Maxwell potentially knows far more about Epstein’s inner circle than has ever been made public, and if she ever chooses to talk, his past dealings with both of them could come under renewed legal and political scrutiny.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75763606Wed, 14 Oct 2026 12:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciGhislaine Maxwell’s shrinking legal options have renewed speculation that she could eventually decide to cooperate with investigators or Congress and provide information about Jeffrey Epstein’s powerful associates, including Prince Andrew. Maxwell...
Andrew has continued to face scrutiny over his relationship with Epstein and Maxwell despite denying wrongdoing and settling Virginia Giuffre’s civil lawsuit without admitting liability. He has also resisted efforts by U.S. lawmakers to question him, while Maxwell recently invoked the Fifth Amendment and refused to answer congressional questions about Epstein and his associates. The central issue is whether Maxwell’s silence will hold if she decides cooperation offers her the only meaningful path to relief. For Andrew, the risk is obvious: Maxwell potentially knows far more about Epstein’s inner circle than has ever been made public, and if she ever chooses to talk, his past dealings with both of them could come under renewed legal and political scrutiny.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>782epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-the-contentious-battle-over-the-venue-10-14-26--75761909
The defense ultimately prevailed. In September 2024, Judge Judge ruled that the case should be moved out of Latah County, concluding that the combination of pervasive publicity, the small local population and the intensity of community interest created too great a risk to Kohberger’s right to an impartial jury. The Idaho Supreme Court then transferred the case to Ada County and assigned Judge Steven Hippler, moving the prosecution hundreds of miles away from Moscow. The ruling was significant because prosecutors had spent months resisting the change and maintaining that voir dire could solve any bias problems, while the defense insisted that the damage had already been done. In the end, the court accepted the defense’s central argument that this was not a routine high-profile case and that trying Kohberger in the community where the murders occurred carried too much risk of seating jurors who had already been deeply exposed to the case.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75761909Wed, 14 Oct 2026 10:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe battle over where Bryan Kohberger would be tried became one of the most contentious pretrial fights in the Idaho murders case because the defense argued that Latah County was simply too saturated with publicity and community emotion to produce a...
The defense ultimately prevailed. In September 2024, Judge Judge ruled that the case should be moved out of Latah County, concluding that the combination of pervasive publicity, the small local population and the intensity of community interest created too great a risk to Kohberger’s right to an impartial jury. The Idaho Supreme Court then transferred the case to Ada County and assigned Judge Steven Hippler, moving the prosecution hundreds of miles away from Moscow. The ruling was significant because prosecutors had spent months resisting the change and maintaining that voir dire could solve any bias problems, while the defense insisted that the damage had already been done. In the end, the court accepted the defense’s central argument that this was not a routine high-profile case and that trying Kohberger in the community where the murders occurred carried too much risk of seating jurors who had already been deeply exposed to the case.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2983bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-the-dick-s-purchases-10-14-26--75761908
Beyond the balaclava, Kohberger’s past purchases are also under scrutiny. Reports indicate he bought a combat knife, a sheath, and a sharpener months before the attack. While none of these items alone prove guilt, together, they paint a picture of someone acquiring tools that could have been used in the crime. The defense will likely argue that these are common items, and the receipt doesn’t prove intent. However, the prosecution will likely use this mounting digital and physical evidence to demonstrate that Kohberger had not only the means but also a clear pattern of behavior that suggests planning. With each new detail, the case against Kohberger tightens, making it increasingly difficult for the defense to argue reasonable doubt.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Bryan Kohberger's purchase at Dick's Sporting Goods offers bombshell evidence in case of murdered Idaho students | Daily Mail Online

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75761908Wed, 14 Oct 2026 08:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciThe evidence against Bryan Kohberger has steadily mounted since his arrest, and the recent revelation of a Dick’s Sporting Goods receipt adds another layer of scrutiny to the case. Investigators have already linked Kohberger to the crime scene through...
Beyond the balaclava, Kohberger’s past purchases are also under scrutiny. Reports indicate he bought a combat knife, a sheath, and a sharpener months before the attack. While none of these items alone prove guilt, together, they paint a picture of someone acquiring tools that could have been used in the crime. The defense will likely argue that these are common items, and the receipt doesn’t prove intent. However, the prosecution will likely use this mounting digital and physical evidence to demonstrate that Kohberger had not only the means but also a clear pattern of behavior that suggests planning. With each new detail, the case against Kohberger tightens, making it increasingly difficult for the defense to argue reasonable doubt.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Bryan Kohberger's purchase at Dick's Sporting Goods offers bombshell evidence in case of murdered Idaho students | Daily Mail Online

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3261bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-juan-alessi-and-his-damning-testimony-during-the-ghislaine-maxwell-trial-10-13-26--75761904
The defense also sought to separate Maxwell from some of Epstein’s activities by emphasizing that Alessi did not know everything that happened inside the house and that Epstein sometimes kept things from Maxwell. Pagliuca elicited testimony that Epstein instructed Alessi to remove photographs of Maxwell when other women were coming to stay, suggesting that Epstein maintained parts of his private life without Maxwell’s knowledge. That line of questioning was designed to counter the prosecution’s portrayal of Maxwell as an all-knowing manager and facilitator of Epstein’s world. Even so, the cross-examination did not erase Alessi’s broader testimony that Maxwell exercised substantial authority over the Palm Beach residence and gave him detailed instructions about how the household was to be run. Instead, the defense focused on creating doubt about how much Alessi truly knew, how accurately he remembered events decades later, and whether his testimony proved Maxwell knowingly participated in Epstein’s sexual abuse rather than simply managed aspects of his household.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75761904Wed, 14 Oct 2026 06:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciDuring Juan Alessi’s cross-examination in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, the defense tried to undermine his credibility and narrow the significance of his testimony about Maxwell’s role inside Jeffrey Epstein’s Palm Beach household. Maxwell attorney...
The defense also sought to separate Maxwell from some of Epstein’s activities by emphasizing that Alessi did not know everything that happened inside the house and that Epstein sometimes kept things from Maxwell. Pagliuca elicited testimony that Epstein instructed Alessi to remove photographs of Maxwell when other women were coming to stay, suggesting that Epstein maintained parts of his private life without Maxwell’s knowledge. That line of questioning was designed to counter the prosecution’s portrayal of Maxwell as an all-knowing manager and facilitator of Epstein’s world. Even so, the cross-examination did not erase Alessi’s broader testimony that Maxwell exercised substantial authority over the Palm Beach residence and gave him detailed instructions about how the household was to be run. Instead, the defense focused on creating doubt about how much Alessi truly knew, how accurately he remembered events decades later, and whether his testimony proved Maxwell knowingly participated in Epstein’s sexual abuse rather than simply managed aspects of his household.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3200epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-bryan-kohberger-s-memo-in-support-of-trifurcating-the-proceedings-part-2--75757527

1. Three Phases of the Case:
   • Liability Phase: Determining whether the defendant is responsible or guilty of the matter at hand.
   • Eligibility Phase: In cases like death penalty or complex civil cases, this phase determines whether the defendant is eligible for a specific penalty or remedy. For example, in a capital punishment case, the eligibility phase may decide whether the defendant qualifies for the death penalty based on aggravating factors.
   • Penalty or Damages Phase: If the defendant is found eligible, the final phase determines the specific punishment or the amount of damages to be awarded.
2. Applying the Rules of Evidence:
   • During the eligibility phase, the court will strictly apply the rules of evidence, meaning that only admissible evidence, as defined by formal legal standards, can be presented. These rules are designed to ensure the fairness of the proceedings and prevent irrelevant, unreliable, or overly prejudicial evidence from influencing the decision.

In summary, trifurcating the proceedings with evidence rules applied during the eligibility phase ensures that the determination of eligibility (such as for a specific sentence or legal remedy) is made based on legally sound, admissible evidence.




to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

090524-Motion-Memorandum-Support-Trifurcate-Apply-Rules-Evidence.pdf


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75757527Wed, 14 Oct 2026 04:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciTo trifurcate the proceedings in a legal context means to divide the case into three separate phases, each focusing on a distinct issue. This is often done to improve the efficiency and clarity of complex cases by addressing one issue at a time.When...

1. Three Phases of the Case:
   • Liability Phase: Determining whether the defendant is responsible or guilty of the matter at hand.
   • Eligibility Phase: In cases like death penalty or complex civil cases, this phase determines whether the defendant is eligible for a specific penalty or remedy. For example, in a capital punishment case, the eligibility phase may decide whether the defendant qualifies for the death penalty based on aggravating factors.
   • Penalty or Damages Phase: If the defendant is found eligible, the final phase determines the specific punishment or the amount of damages to be awarded.
2. Applying the Rules of Evidence:
   • During the eligibility phase, the court will strictly apply the rules of evidence, meaning that only admissible evidence, as defined by formal legal standards, can be presented. These rules are designed to ensure the fairness of the proceedings and prevent irrelevant, unreliable, or overly prejudicial evidence from influencing the decision.

In summary, trifurcating the proceedings with evidence rules applied during the eligibility phase ensures that the determination of eligibility (such as for a specific sentence or legal remedy) is made based on legally sound, admissible evidence.




to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

090524-Motion-Memorandum-Support-Trifurcate-Apply-Rules-Evidence.pdf


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>789bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-bryan-kohberger-s-memo-in-support-of-trifurcating-the-proceedings-part-1--75757526

1. Three Phases of the Case:
   • Liability Phase: Determining whether the defendant is responsible or guilty of the matter at hand.
   • Eligibility Phase: In cases like death penalty or complex civil cases, this phase determines whether the defendant is eligible for a specific penalty or remedy. For example, in a capital punishment case, the eligibility phase may decide whether the defendant qualifies for the death penalty based on aggravating factors.
   • Penalty or Damages Phase: If the defendant is found eligible, the final phase determines the specific punishment or the amount of damages to be awarded.
2. Applying the Rules of Evidence:
   • During the eligibility phase, the court will strictly apply the rules of evidence, meaning that only admissible evidence, as defined by formal legal standards, can be presented. These rules are designed to ensure the fairness of the proceedings and prevent irrelevant, unreliable, or overly prejudicial evidence from influencing the decision.

In summary, trifurcating the proceedings with evidence rules applied during the eligibility phase ensures that the determination of eligibility (such as for a specific sentence or legal remedy) is made based on legally sound, admissible evidence.




to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

090524-Motion-Memorandum-Support-Trifurcate-Apply-Rules-Evidence.pdf


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75757526Wed, 14 Oct 2026 02:20:01 +0000Bobby CapucciTo trifurcate the proceedings in a legal context means to divide the case into three separate phases, each focusing on a distinct issue. This is often done to improve the efficiency and clarity of complex cases by addressing one issue at a time.When...

1. Three Phases of the Case:
   • Liability Phase: Determining whether the defendant is responsible or guilty of the matter at hand.
   • Eligibility Phase: In cases like death penalty or complex civil cases, this phase determines whether the defendant is eligible for a specific penalty or remedy. For example, in a capital punishment case, the eligibility phase may decide whether the defendant qualifies for the death penalty based on aggravating factors.
   • Penalty or Damages Phase: If the defendant is found eligible, the final phase determines the specific punishment or the amount of damages to be awarded.
2. Applying the Rules of Evidence:
   • During the eligibility phase, the court will strictly apply the rules of evidence, meaning that only admissible evidence, as defined by formal legal standards, can be presented. These rules are designed to ensure the fairness of the proceedings and prevent irrelevant, unreliable, or overly prejudicial evidence from influencing the decision.

In summary, trifurcating the proceedings with evidence rules applied during the eligibility phase ensures that the determination of eligibility (such as for a specific sentence or legal remedy) is made based on legally sound, admissible evidence.




to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

090524-Motion-Memorandum-Support-Trifurcate-Apply-Rules-Evidence.pdf


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>757bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcript-day-4-part-8-10-13-26--75757538

The state also spent a significant portion of the day strengthening the forensic connection between Robinson and the physical evidence. Investigators testified that Robinson’s DNA was found on numerous portions of the rifle recovered near Utah Valley University, including the stock, grips, trigger area, bolt and barrel, as well as on ammunition associated with the weapon. An ATF analysis also linked a rotary engraving tool recovered from Robinson’s residence to markings found on cartridge cases, supporting the prosecution’s allegation that ammunition had been engraved before the shooting. At the same time, the forensic evidence was not absolute across the board: investigators could not conclusively determine that the bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Kirk’s autopsy had been fired from the recovered rifle. By the end of the fourth day, however, prosecutors had combined Robinson’s alleged admissions, Twiggs’ account, the handwritten note, surveillance evidence and extensive DNA testimony into their clearest presentation yet of why they believe Robinson was the shooter.







to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75757538Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:20:03 +0000Bobby CapucciDay four of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing, held July 9, centered on some of the prosecution’s most consequential evidence yet, including a recorded interview with Robinson’s former roommate and romantic partner, Lance Twiggs. In the interview,...

The state also spent a significant portion of the day strengthening the forensic connection between Robinson and the physical evidence. Investigators testified that Robinson’s DNA was found on numerous portions of the rifle recovered near Utah Valley University, including the stock, grips, trigger area, bolt and barrel, as well as on ammunition associated with the weapon. An ATF analysis also linked a rotary engraving tool recovered from Robinson’s residence to markings found on cartridge cases, supporting the prosecution’s allegation that ammunition had been engraved before the shooting. At the same time, the forensic evidence was not absolute across the board: investigators could not conclusively determine that the bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Kirk’s autopsy had been fired from the recovered rifle. By the end of the fourth day, however, prosecutors had combined Robinson’s alleged admissions, Twiggs’ account, the handwritten note, surveillance evidence and extensive DNA testimony into their clearest presentation yet of why they believe Robinson was the shooter.







to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>704breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcript-day-4-part-7-10-13-26--75733111

The state also spent a significant portion of the day strengthening the forensic connection between Robinson and the physical evidence. Investigators testified that Robinson’s DNA was found on numerous portions of the rifle recovered near Utah Valley University, including the stock, grips, trigger area, bolt and barrel, as well as on ammunition associated with the weapon. An ATF analysis also linked a rotary engraving tool recovered from Robinson’s residence to markings found on cartridge cases, supporting the prosecution’s allegation that ammunition had been engraved before the shooting. At the same time, the forensic evidence was not absolute across the board: investigators could not conclusively determine that the bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Kirk’s autopsy had been fired from the recovered rifle. By the end of the fourth day, however, prosecutors had combined Robinson’s alleged admissions, Twiggs’ account, the handwritten note, surveillance evidence and extensive DNA testimony into their clearest presentation yet of why they believe Robinson was the shooter.







to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75733111Tue, 13 Oct 2026 22:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay four of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing, held July 9, centered on some of the prosecution’s most consequential evidence yet, including a recorded interview with Robinson’s former roommate and romantic partner, Lance Twiggs. In the interview,...

The state also spent a significant portion of the day strengthening the forensic connection between Robinson and the physical evidence. Investigators testified that Robinson’s DNA was found on numerous portions of the rifle recovered near Utah Valley University, including the stock, grips, trigger area, bolt and barrel, as well as on ammunition associated with the weapon. An ATF analysis also linked a rotary engraving tool recovered from Robinson’s residence to markings found on cartridge cases, supporting the prosecution’s allegation that ammunition had been engraved before the shooting. At the same time, the forensic evidence was not absolute across the board: investigators could not conclusively determine that the bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Kirk’s autopsy had been fired from the recovered rifle. By the end of the fourth day, however, prosecutors had combined Robinson’s alleged admissions, Twiggs’ account, the handwritten note, surveillance evidence and extensive DNA testimony into their clearest presentation yet of why they believe Robinson was the shooter.







to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>707breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-federal-charges-swept-aside-by-epstein-s-sweetheart-deal-part-2-10-14-26--75763604
That indictment was never filed because the federal case was instead resolved through the non-prosecution agreement negotiated by Alex Acosta’s office and Epstein’s attorneys. Epstein avoided federal prosecution, pleaded guilty to two state prostitution-related charges, served a notoriously lenient sentence with extensive work release, and received federal protection that also extended to unnamed potential co-conspirators. The abandoned prosecution memorandum is therefore one of the clearest measures of what prosecutors believed they could prove before the case was bargained away: this was not an investigation that collapsed because investigators found nothing. Federal prosecutors had assembled victims, evidence and a detailed charging plan, only for that plan to be replaced by one of the most controversial plea arrangements in modern Justice Department history. DOJ’s own later review concluded that Acosta exercised poor judgment in resolving the investigation through the NPA, even though it stopped short of finding professional misconduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

EFTA01718407.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75763604Tue, 13 Oct 2026 20:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBefore Jeffrey Epstein received his extraordinary 2007 non-prosecution agreement, federal prosecutors in South Florida had prepared a sweeping case against him that could have resulted in dozens of federal charges involving the sexual exploitation and...
That indictment was never filed because the federal case was instead resolved through the non-prosecution agreement negotiated by Alex Acosta’s office and Epstein’s attorneys. Epstein avoided federal prosecution, pleaded guilty to two state prostitution-related charges, served a notoriously lenient sentence with extensive work release, and received federal protection that also extended to unnamed potential co-conspirators. The abandoned prosecution memorandum is therefore one of the clearest measures of what prosecutors believed they could prove before the case was bargained away: this was not an investigation that collapsed because investigators found nothing. Federal prosecutors had assembled victims, evidence and a detailed charging plan, only for that plan to be replaced by one of the most controversial plea arrangements in modern Justice Department history. DOJ’s own later review concluded that Acosta exercised poor judgment in resolving the investigation through the NPA, even though it stopped short of finding professional misconduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

EFTA01718407.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>687epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/epstein-survivors-amend-their-lawsuit-filed-against-the-u-s-government-part-6-10-12-26--75733109
At the heart of the lawsuit is the claim that the government’s failures were not abstract bureaucratic mistakes but a direct cause of additional women and girls being victimized. The plaintiffs allege that if the FBI and DOJ had acted on the information they possessed, Epstein would have been stopped years earlier and many of the assaults described in the complaint would never have occurred. They are pursuing negligence claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act, including theories based on the voluntary-undertaking and zone-of-risk doctrines, and seek monetary damages for physical injuries, psychological trauma, lost earnings, medical expenses and other harm. The complaint goes so far as to allege that repeated federal inaction allowed Epstein and others to continue a sex-trafficking conspiracy for nearly 25 years, making this lawsuit not simply an attack on Epstein’s conduct, but a direct attempt to hold the federal government financially and legally accountable for failing to intervene when it allegedly had repeated opportunities to do so


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

epstein-victims-fbi-fourth-complaint.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75733109Tue, 13 Oct 2026 20:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe fourth amended complaint, filed in the Southern District of Florida by more than 30 Jeffrey Epstein survivors against the United States, accuses the FBI and DOJ of decades of negligence that allegedly allowed Epstein’s abuse and trafficking...
At the heart of the lawsuit is the claim that the government’s failures were not abstract bureaucratic mistakes but a direct cause of additional women and girls being victimized. The plaintiffs allege that if the FBI and DOJ had acted on the information they possessed, Epstein would have been stopped years earlier and many of the assaults described in the complaint would never have occurred. They are pursuing negligence claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act, including theories based on the voluntary-undertaking and zone-of-risk doctrines, and seek monetary damages for physical injuries, psychological trauma, lost earnings, medical expenses and other harm. The complaint goes so far as to allege that repeated federal inaction allowed Epstein and others to continue a sex-trafficking conspiracy for nearly 25 years, making this lawsuit not simply an attack on Epstein’s conduct, but a direct attempt to hold the federal government financially and legally accountable for failing to intervene when it allegedly had repeated opportunities to do so


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

epstein-victims-fbi-fourth-complaint.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>782epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/epstein-survivors-amend-their-lawsuit-filed-against-the-u-s-government-part-5-10-12-26--75733110
At the heart of the lawsuit is the claim that the government’s failures were not abstract bureaucratic mistakes but a direct cause of additional women and girls being victimized. The plaintiffs allege that if the FBI and DOJ had acted on the information they possessed, Epstein would have been stopped years earlier and many of the assaults described in the complaint would never have occurred. They are pursuing negligence claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act, including theories based on the voluntary-undertaking and zone-of-risk doctrines, and seek monetary damages for physical injuries, psychological trauma, lost earnings, medical expenses and other harm. The complaint goes so far as to allege that repeated federal inaction allowed Epstein and others to continue a sex-trafficking conspiracy for nearly 25 years, making this lawsuit not simply an attack on Epstein’s conduct, but a direct attempt to hold the federal government financially and legally accountable for failing to intervene when it allegedly had repeated opportunities to do so


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

epstein-victims-fbi-fourth-complaint.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75733110Tue, 13 Oct 2026 18:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe fourth amended complaint, filed in the Southern District of Florida by more than 30 Jeffrey Epstein survivors against the United States, accuses the FBI and DOJ of decades of negligence that allegedly allowed Epstein’s abuse and trafficking...
At the heart of the lawsuit is the claim that the government’s failures were not abstract bureaucratic mistakes but a direct cause of additional women and girls being victimized. The plaintiffs allege that if the FBI and DOJ had acted on the information they possessed, Epstein would have been stopped years earlier and many of the assaults described in the complaint would never have occurred. They are pursuing negligence claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act, including theories based on the voluntary-undertaking and zone-of-risk doctrines, and seek monetary damages for physical injuries, psychological trauma, lost earnings, medical expenses and other harm. The complaint goes so far as to allege that repeated federal inaction allowed Epstein and others to continue a sex-trafficking conspiracy for nearly 25 years, making this lawsuit not simply an attack on Epstein’s conduct, but a direct attempt to hold the federal government financially and legally accountable for failing to intervene when it allegedly had repeated opportunities to do so


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

epstein-victims-fbi-fourth-complaint.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>676epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/james-goldsmith-jeffrey-epstein-and-the-warning-nobody-followed-up-on-part-3-10-13-26--75733106
The story also connects Goldsmith’s business presence on Hilton Head Island, South Carolina, to the unresolved allegations of Jane Doe 4, who told the FBI in 2019 that Epstein had sexually abused and trafficked her there during the 1980s when she was a teenager. The Guardian did not establish that Epstein was definitively on Hilton Head during the period she described, but it found that Goldsmith’s company had operations and associates there, giving investigators another possible avenue for examining Epstein’s movements during a period for which the public record remains unusually thin. Jane Doe 4 also alleged that Epstein trafficked her to other men, including Donald Trump, an allegation the White House has strongly denied. The larger importance of the report is that it pushes the timeline of concerns about Epstein much further back than the 1996 Maria Farmer complaint and raises the possibility that warnings about his conduct were circulating among wealthy insiders years before law enforcement seriously acted.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

British billionaire warned Epstein was a ‘sexual deviant’ decades before FBI closed in on the abuser | Jeffrey Epstein | The Guardian

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75733106Tue, 13 Oct 2026 16:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe Guardian reported that British billionaire Sir James Goldsmith was allegedly warning people about Jeffrey Epstein as early as the late 1980s, decades before Epstein became the subject of a federal sex-trafficking investigation. French architect...
The story also connects Goldsmith’s business presence on Hilton Head Island, South Carolina, to the unresolved allegations of Jane Doe 4, who told the FBI in 2019 that Epstein had sexually abused and trafficked her there during the 1980s when she was a teenager. The Guardian did not establish that Epstein was definitively on Hilton Head during the period she described, but it found that Goldsmith’s company had operations and associates there, giving investigators another possible avenue for examining Epstein’s movements during a period for which the public record remains unusually thin. Jane Doe 4 also alleged that Epstein trafficked her to other men, including Donald Trump, an allegation the White House has strongly denied. The larger importance of the report is that it pushes the timeline of concerns about Epstein much further back than the 1996 Maria Farmer complaint and raises the possibility that warnings about his conduct were circulating among wealthy insiders years before law enforcement seriously acted.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

British billionaire warned Epstein was a ‘sexual deviant’ decades before FBI closed in on the abuser | Jeffrey Epstein | The Guardian

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1350epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/james-goldsmith-jeffrey-epstein-and-the-warning-nobody-followed-up-on-part-2-10-13-26--75733108
The story also connects Goldsmith’s business presence on Hilton Head Island, South Carolina, to the unresolved allegations of Jane Doe 4, who told the FBI in 2019 that Epstein had sexually abused and trafficked her there during the 1980s when she was a teenager. The Guardian did not establish that Epstein was definitively on Hilton Head during the period she described, but it found that Goldsmith’s company had operations and associates there, giving investigators another possible avenue for examining Epstein’s movements during a period for which the public record remains unusually thin. Jane Doe 4 also alleged that Epstein trafficked her to other men, including Donald Trump, an allegation the White House has strongly denied. The larger importance of the report is that it pushes the timeline of concerns about Epstein much further back than the 1996 Maria Farmer complaint and raises the possibility that warnings about his conduct were circulating among wealthy insiders years before law enforcement seriously acted.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

British billionaire warned Epstein was a ‘sexual deviant’ decades before FBI closed in on the abuser | Jeffrey Epstein | The Guardian

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75733108Tue, 13 Oct 2026 14:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe Guardian reported that British billionaire Sir James Goldsmith was allegedly warning people about Jeffrey Epstein as early as the late 1980s, decades before Epstein became the subject of a federal sex-trafficking investigation. French architect...
The story also connects Goldsmith’s business presence on Hilton Head Island, South Carolina, to the unresolved allegations of Jane Doe 4, who told the FBI in 2019 that Epstein had sexually abused and trafficked her there during the 1980s when she was a teenager. The Guardian did not establish that Epstein was definitively on Hilton Head during the period she described, but it found that Goldsmith’s company had operations and associates there, giving investigators another possible avenue for examining Epstein’s movements during a period for which the public record remains unusually thin. Jane Doe 4 also alleged that Epstein trafficked her to other men, including Donald Trump, an allegation the White House has strongly denied. The larger importance of the report is that it pushes the timeline of concerns about Epstein much further back than the 1996 Maria Farmer complaint and raises the possibility that warnings about his conduct were circulating among wealthy insiders years before law enforcement seriously acted.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

British billionaire warned Epstein was a ‘sexual deviant’ decades before FBI closed in on the abuser | Jeffrey Epstein | The Guardian

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1074epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/james-goldsmith-jeffrey-epstein-and-the-warning-nobody-followed-up-on-part-1-10-13-26--75733107
The story also connects Goldsmith’s business presence on Hilton Head Island, South Carolina, to the unresolved allegations of Jane Doe 4, who told the FBI in 2019 that Epstein had sexually abused and trafficked her there during the 1980s when she was a teenager. The Guardian did not establish that Epstein was definitively on Hilton Head during the period she described, but it found that Goldsmith’s company had operations and associates there, giving investigators another possible avenue for examining Epstein’s movements during a period for which the public record remains unusually thin. Jane Doe 4 also alleged that Epstein trafficked her to other men, including Donald Trump, an allegation the White House has strongly denied. The larger importance of the report is that it pushes the timeline of concerns about Epstein much further back than the 1996 Maria Farmer complaint and raises the possibility that warnings about his conduct were circulating among wealthy insiders years before law enforcement seriously acted.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

British billionaire warned Epstein was a ‘sexual deviant’ decades before FBI closed in on the abuser | Jeffrey Epstein | The Guardian

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75733107Tue, 13 Oct 2026 12:37:49 +0000Bobby CapucciThe Guardian reported that British billionaire Sir James Goldsmith was allegedly warning people about Jeffrey Epstein as early as the late 1980s, decades before Epstein became the subject of a federal sex-trafficking investigation. French architect...
The story also connects Goldsmith’s business presence on Hilton Head Island, South Carolina, to the unresolved allegations of Jane Doe 4, who told the FBI in 2019 that Epstein had sexually abused and trafficked her there during the 1980s when she was a teenager. The Guardian did not establish that Epstein was definitively on Hilton Head during the period she described, but it found that Goldsmith’s company had operations and associates there, giving investigators another possible avenue for examining Epstein’s movements during a period for which the public record remains unusually thin. Jane Doe 4 also alleged that Epstein trafficked her to other men, including Donald Trump, an allegation the White House has strongly denied. The larger importance of the report is that it pushes the timeline of concerns about Epstein much further back than the 1996 Maria Farmer complaint and raises the possibility that warnings about his conduct were circulating among wealthy insiders years before law enforcement seriously acted.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

British billionaire warned Epstein was a ‘sexual deviant’ decades before FBI closed in on the abuser | Jeffrey Epstein | The Guardian

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>913epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-the-bouncing-trial-date-10-13-26--75730400
Even the August schedule kept changing. The court initially planned for the trial to begin August 11, 2025, with jury selection starting in late July, but Hippler later pushed opening statements to approximately August 18 and moved voir dire to August 4. The defense continued seeking additional delays, citing the enormous amount of preparation required in a death-penalty case and publicity surrounding the prosecution, but Hippler rejected a broader continuance. In the end, none of those trial dates mattered: on June 30, 2025, only weeks before jury selection was supposed to begin, Kohberger agreed to plead guilty to all four murders and burglary in exchange for the death penalty being taken off the table. What began as an October 2023 trial became a June 2025 trial, then an August 2025 trial, and finally no trial at all.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75730400Tue, 13 Oct 2026 10:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBryan Kohberger’s murder trial went through several different projected start dates before it ultimately never happened at all. After his May 2023 arraignment, the case was initially set for trial on October 2, 2023, but that date disappeared when...
Even the August schedule kept changing. The court initially planned for the trial to begin August 11, 2025, with jury selection starting in late July, but Hippler later pushed opening statements to approximately August 18 and moved voir dire to August 4. The defense continued seeking additional delays, citing the enormous amount of preparation required in a death-penalty case and publicity surrounding the prosecution, but Hippler rejected a broader continuance. In the end, none of those trial dates mattered: on June 30, 2025, only weeks before jury selection was supposed to begin, Kohberger agreed to plead guilty to all four murders and burglary in exchange for the death penalty being taken off the table. What began as an October 2023 trial became a June 2025 trial, then an August 2025 trial, and finally no trial at all.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2360bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-judge-judge-warns-kohberger-and-the-state-about-contacting-potential-jurors-10-12-26--75730399
The defense pushed back, arguing that the survey was legitimate research necessary to support Kohberger’s change-of-venue motion and did not violate the court’s gag order. Anne Taylor accused prosecutors of trying to shut down constitutionally protected defense preparation and maintained that polling community attitudes was different from improperly influencing jurors. After holding hearings and reviewing the questions, Judge ultimately lifted the blanket prohibition in April 2024 and allowed the defense survey to continue without modification. So the warning to both sides was temporary, but it reflected how seriously the court viewed any outside contact with people who might eventually sit on the jury: neither prosecutors nor the defense were going to be permitted to shape, question or potentially influence prospective jurors without the court keeping a close watch on what they were doing.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75730399Tue, 13 Oct 2026 08:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn March 2024, Judge John Judge temporarily barred both Bryan Kohberger’s defense team and prosecutors from contacting prospective jurors in Latah County, either directly or through third parties, after a dispute erupted over a telephone survey...
The defense pushed back, arguing that the survey was legitimate research necessary to support Kohberger’s change-of-venue motion and did not violate the court’s gag order. Anne Taylor accused prosecutors of trying to shut down constitutionally protected defense preparation and maintained that polling community attitudes was different from improperly influencing jurors. After holding hearings and reviewing the questions, Judge ultimately lifted the blanket prohibition in April 2024 and allowed the defense survey to continue without modification. So the warning to both sides was temporary, but it reflected how seriously the court viewed any outside contact with people who might eventually sit on the jury: neither prosecutors nor the defense were going to be permitted to shape, question or potentially influence prospective jurors without the court keeping a close watch on what they were doing.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2876bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-overlap-in-the-karen-read-and-sandra-birchmore-cases-10-12-26--75730428
The overlap became even more significant because federal authorities eventually scrutinized both matters. The FBI investigated circumstances surrounding Read’s prosecution and separately built the case that led to Farwell’s federal indictment in Birchmore’s death. Public attention generated by the Read case also helped pull Birchmore’s case back into the spotlight, with critics pointing to both investigations as examples of why police investigating cases involving other police officers demanded extraordinary transparency. The cases were not factually connected—there is no evidence that O’Keefe’s death and Birchmore’s death were part of the same event or conspiracy—but institutionally they collided in a major way: the same regional law-enforcement apparatus that was defending its work in one nationally scrutinized case was being forced to answer difficult questions about its work in another.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75730428Tue, 13 Oct 2026 06:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe Karen Read case and the Sandra Birchmore case overlapped because both exposed serious questions about the same corner of Massachusetts law enforcement, particularly the Massachusetts State Police detective unit assigned to the Norfolk County...
The overlap became even more significant because federal authorities eventually scrutinized both matters. The FBI investigated circumstances surrounding Read’s prosecution and separately built the case that led to Farwell’s federal indictment in Birchmore’s death. Public attention generated by the Read case also helped pull Birchmore’s case back into the spotlight, with critics pointing to both investigations as examples of why police investigating cases involving other police officers demanded extraordinary transparency. The cases were not factually connected—there is no evidence that O’Keefe’s death and Birchmore’s death were part of the same event or conspiracy—but institutionally they collided in a major way: the same regional law-enforcement apparatus that was defending its work in one nationally scrutinized case was being forced to answer difficult questions about its work in another.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3175abuseofpower,cantonpolice,crimenews,farwelltrial,fbiinvestigation,federaltrial,justiceforsandra,justiceforsandrabirchmore,massachusettscrime,matthewfarwell,norfolkcounty,policecorruption,policeculture,policemisconduct,sandrabirchmore,sandrabirchmorecase,stoughtonpolice,truecrime,truecrimecommunity,truecrimepodcasttruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-the-state-responds-to-kohberger-s-objection-to-the-911-call--75730026
To support this argument, the State provides a detailed analysis of the 911 call transcript, categorizing each statement to demonstrate its admissibility. For instance, statements describing the situation as it unfolded are labeled as present sense impressions, while expressions of distress are considered excited utterances. The State maintains that the entire call meets the criteria for these exceptions and should be admitted in full to provide the jury with a comprehensive understanding of the events and the immediate reactions of the individuals involved.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

032425-States+Reply+to+Defendants+Objection+to+States+Motion+in+Limine+RE+911+Call.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75730026Tue, 13 Oct 2026 04:20:02 +0000Bobby Capucci​In response to the defense's objection, the State of Idaho argues that the 911 call made on November 13, 2022, following the discovery of an unresponsive individual at 1122 King Road, should be admitted as evidence under the excited utterance and...
To support this argument, the State provides a detailed analysis of the 911 call transcript, categorizing each statement to demonstrate its admissibility. For instance, statements describing the situation as it unfolded are labeled as present sense impressions, while expressions of distress are considered excited utterances. The State maintains that the entire call meets the criteria for these exceptions and should be admitted in full to provide the jury with a comprehensive understanding of the events and the immediate reactions of the individuals involved.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

032425-States+Reply+to+Defendants+Objection+to+States+Motion+in+Limine+RE+911+Call.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>762bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-kohberger-s-reply-to-the-objection-to-exclude-rylene-nowlin--75729993

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

032425-Defendants-Reply-States-Objection-Defendants-MIL6-RE-Nowlin-Touch-Contact-DNA.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75729993Tue, 13 Oct 2026 02:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn Case Number CR01-24-31665, defendant Bryan C. Kohberger has filed a reply to the State's objection concerning his Motion in Limine #6, which seeks to exclude specific opinions of forensic analyst Rylene Nowlin and the use of the terms "touch DNA"...

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

032425-Defendants-Reply-States-Objection-Defendants-MIL6-RE-Nowlin-Touch-Contact-DNA.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1079bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcript-day-4-part-6-10-12-26--75729908

The state also spent a significant portion of the day strengthening the forensic connection between Robinson and the physical evidence. Investigators testified that Robinson’s DNA was found on numerous portions of the rifle recovered near Utah Valley University, including the stock, grips, trigger area, bolt and barrel, as well as on ammunition associated with the weapon. An ATF analysis also linked a rotary engraving tool recovered from Robinson’s residence to markings found on cartridge cases, supporting the prosecution’s allegation that ammunition had been engraved before the shooting. At the same time, the forensic evidence was not absolute across the board: investigators could not conclusively determine that the bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Kirk’s autopsy had been fired from the recovered rifle. By the end of the fourth day, however, prosecutors had combined Robinson’s alleged admissions, Twiggs’ account, the handwritten note, surveillance evidence and extensive DNA testimony into their clearest presentation yet of why they believe Robinson was the shooter.







to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75729908Mon, 12 Oct 2026 22:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay four of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing, held July 9, centered on some of the prosecution’s most consequential evidence yet, including a recorded interview with Robinson’s former roommate and romantic partner, Lance Twiggs. In the interview,...

The state also spent a significant portion of the day strengthening the forensic connection between Robinson and the physical evidence. Investigators testified that Robinson’s DNA was found on numerous portions of the rifle recovered near Utah Valley University, including the stock, grips, trigger area, bolt and barrel, as well as on ammunition associated with the weapon. An ATF analysis also linked a rotary engraving tool recovered from Robinson’s residence to markings found on cartridge cases, supporting the prosecution’s allegation that ammunition had been engraved before the shooting. At the same time, the forensic evidence was not absolute across the board: investigators could not conclusively determine that the bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Kirk’s autopsy had been fired from the recovered rifle. By the end of the fourth day, however, prosecutors had combined Robinson’s alleged admissions, Twiggs’ account, the handwritten note, surveillance evidence and extensive DNA testimony into their clearest presentation yet of why they believe Robinson was the shooter.







to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>632breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcript-day-4-part-5-10-12-26--75729909

The state also spent a significant portion of the day strengthening the forensic connection between Robinson and the physical evidence. Investigators testified that Robinson’s DNA was found on numerous portions of the rifle recovered near Utah Valley University, including the stock, grips, trigger area, bolt and barrel, as well as on ammunition associated with the weapon. An ATF analysis also linked a rotary engraving tool recovered from Robinson’s residence to markings found on cartridge cases, supporting the prosecution’s allegation that ammunition had been engraved before the shooting. At the same time, the forensic evidence was not absolute across the board: investigators could not conclusively determine that the bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Kirk’s autopsy had been fired from the recovered rifle. By the end of the fourth day, however, prosecutors had combined Robinson’s alleged admissions, Twiggs’ account, the handwritten note, surveillance evidence and extensive DNA testimony into their clearest presentation yet of why they believe Robinson was the shooter.







to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75729909Mon, 12 Oct 2026 20:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay four of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing, held July 9, centered on some of the prosecution’s most consequential evidence yet, including a recorded interview with Robinson’s former roommate and romantic partner, Lance Twiggs. In the interview,...

The state also spent a significant portion of the day strengthening the forensic connection between Robinson and the physical evidence. Investigators testified that Robinson’s DNA was found on numerous portions of the rifle recovered near Utah Valley University, including the stock, grips, trigger area, bolt and barrel, as well as on ammunition associated with the weapon. An ATF analysis also linked a rotary engraving tool recovered from Robinson’s residence to markings found on cartridge cases, supporting the prosecution’s allegation that ammunition had been engraved before the shooting. At the same time, the forensic evidence was not absolute across the board: investigators could not conclusively determine that the bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Kirk’s autopsy had been fired from the recovered rifle. By the end of the fourth day, however, prosecutors had combined Robinson’s alleged admissions, Twiggs’ account, the handwritten note, surveillance evidence and extensive DNA testimony into their clearest presentation yet of why they believe Robinson was the shooter.







to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>689breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/epstein-survivors-amend-their-lawsuit-filed-against-the-u-s-government-part-4-10-12-26--75729892
At the heart of the lawsuit is the claim that the government’s failures were not abstract bureaucratic mistakes but a direct cause of additional women and girls being victimized. The plaintiffs allege that if the FBI and DOJ had acted on the information they possessed, Epstein would have been stopped years earlier and many of the assaults described in the complaint would never have occurred. They are pursuing negligence claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act, including theories based on the voluntary-undertaking and zone-of-risk doctrines, and seek monetary damages for physical injuries, psychological trauma, lost earnings, medical expenses and other harm. The complaint goes so far as to allege that repeated federal inaction allowed Epstein and others to continue a sex-trafficking conspiracy for nearly 25 years, making this lawsuit not simply an attack on Epstein’s conduct, but a direct attempt to hold the federal government financially and legally accountable for failing to intervene when it allegedly had repeated opportunities to do so


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

epstein-victims-fbi-fourth-complaint.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75729892Mon, 12 Oct 2026 18:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe fourth amended complaint, filed in the Southern District of Florida by more than 30 Jeffrey Epstein survivors against the United States, accuses the FBI and DOJ of decades of negligence that allegedly allowed Epstein’s abuse and trafficking...
At the heart of the lawsuit is the claim that the government’s failures were not abstract bureaucratic mistakes but a direct cause of additional women and girls being victimized. The plaintiffs allege that if the FBI and DOJ had acted on the information they possessed, Epstein would have been stopped years earlier and many of the assaults described in the complaint would never have occurred. They are pursuing negligence claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act, including theories based on the voluntary-undertaking and zone-of-risk doctrines, and seek monetary damages for physical injuries, psychological trauma, lost earnings, medical expenses and other harm. The complaint goes so far as to allege that repeated federal inaction allowed Epstein and others to continue a sex-trafficking conspiracy for nearly 25 years, making this lawsuit not simply an attack on Epstein’s conduct, but a direct attempt to hold the federal government financially and legally accountable for failing to intervene when it allegedly had repeated opportunities to do so


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

epstein-victims-fbi-fourth-complaint.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>816epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/epstein-survivors-amend-their-lawsuit-filed-against-the-u-s-government-part-3-10-12-26--75729891
At the heart of the lawsuit is the claim that the government’s failures were not abstract bureaucratic mistakes but a direct cause of additional women and girls being victimized. The plaintiffs allege that if the FBI and DOJ had acted on the information they possessed, Epstein would have been stopped years earlier and many of the assaults described in the complaint would never have occurred. They are pursuing negligence claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act, including theories based on the voluntary-undertaking and zone-of-risk doctrines, and seek monetary damages for physical injuries, psychological trauma, lost earnings, medical expenses and other harm. The complaint goes so far as to allege that repeated federal inaction allowed Epstein and others to continue a sex-trafficking conspiracy for nearly 25 years, making this lawsuit not simply an attack on Epstein’s conduct, but a direct attempt to hold the federal government financially and legally accountable for failing to intervene when it allegedly had repeated opportunities to do so


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

epstein-victims-fbi-fourth-complaint.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75729891Mon, 12 Oct 2026 16:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe fourth amended complaint, filed in the Southern District of Florida by more than 30 Jeffrey Epstein survivors against the United States, accuses the FBI and DOJ of decades of negligence that allegedly allowed Epstein’s abuse and trafficking...
At the heart of the lawsuit is the claim that the government’s failures were not abstract bureaucratic mistakes but a direct cause of additional women and girls being victimized. The plaintiffs allege that if the FBI and DOJ had acted on the information they possessed, Epstein would have been stopped years earlier and many of the assaults described in the complaint would never have occurred. They are pursuing negligence claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act, including theories based on the voluntary-undertaking and zone-of-risk doctrines, and seek monetary damages for physical injuries, psychological trauma, lost earnings, medical expenses and other harm. The complaint goes so far as to allege that repeated federal inaction allowed Epstein and others to continue a sex-trafficking conspiracy for nearly 25 years, making this lawsuit not simply an attack on Epstein’s conduct, but a direct attempt to hold the federal government financially and legally accountable for failing to intervene when it allegedly had repeated opportunities to do so


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

epstein-victims-fbi-fourth-complaint.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>685epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/virginia-robert-s-and-the-unredacted-motion-to-exceed-her-deposition-limit-10-12-26--75708370

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75708370Mon, 12 Oct 2026 14:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciVirginia Roberts Giuffre, one of Jeffrey Epstein’s most well-known accusers, filed a motion in her defamation lawsuit against Ghislaine Maxwell requesting permission to exceed the standard limit of ten depositions allowed under federal rules....

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1191epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-expedited-motion-to-establish-the-epstein-survivor-compensation-fund-10-12-26--75708369
The effort became tangled in a broader dispute with the U.S. Virgin Islands government, which had placed criminal-activity liens on estate assets and initially objected to aspects of the proposed compensation structure. Indyke and Kahn pressed the court for an expedited ruling and an immediate hearing, arguing that the government should not be permitted to delay the February 2020 consideration of the program after waiting months to formally oppose it. The parties eventually reached an agreement in principle allowing funds to be released for the program, and on June 2, 2020, the probate court granted the estate’s expedited motion authorizing its creation. The Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program formally opened later that month, ultimately providing survivors with a separate claims process outside traditional civil litigation.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75708369Mon, 12 Oct 2026 12:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe co-executors of Jeffrey Epstein’s estate, Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, asked the Virgin Islands probate court to expedite approval of a voluntary compensation program for Epstein’s sexual-abuse survivors, arguing that continued delay would...
The effort became tangled in a broader dispute with the U.S. Virgin Islands government, which had placed criminal-activity liens on estate assets and initially objected to aspects of the proposed compensation structure. Indyke and Kahn pressed the court for an expedited ruling and an immediate hearing, arguing that the government should not be permitted to delay the February 2020 consideration of the program after waiting months to formally oppose it. The parties eventually reached an agreement in principle allowing funds to be released for the program, and on June 2, 2020, the probate court granted the estate’s expedited motion authorizing its creation. The Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program formally opened later that month, ultimately providing survivors with a separate claims process outside traditional civil litigation.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>621epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-sandra-birchmore-and-the-search-for-justice-10-12-26--75701106

In this episode, we begin our deep dive into her tragic story.




to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

Massachusetts Superior Courts Judge Brian A. Davis' Amended Decision and Order Regarding Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Norfolk County, 2282CV01197) - DocumentCloud

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75701106Mon, 12 Oct 2026 10:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciSandra Birchmore was a young woman from Stoughton, Massachusetts, who was reportedly groomed and sexually abused by three former police officers from her teenage years until her death in 2021. The alleged abuse began when she was 15 and continued for...

In this episode, we begin our deep dive into her tragic story.




to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

Massachusetts Superior Courts Judge Brian A. Davis' Amended Decision and Order Regarding Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Norfolk County, 2282CV01197) - DocumentCloud

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3003abuseofpower,cantonpolice,crimenews,farwelltrial,fbiinvestigation,federaltrial,grooming,justiceforsandra,justiceforsandrabirchmore,massachusettscrime,matthewfarwell,norfolkcounty,policecorruption,policemisconduct,sandrabirchmore,sandrabirchmorecase,stoughtonpolice,truecrime,truecrimecommunity,truecrimepodcasttruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-leon-black-and-his-epstein-related-congressional-transcript-10-12-26--75701056
The questioning became confrontational when committee investigators turned to Black’s relationships with women and nondisclosure agreements. Black acknowledged a six-year extramarital affair and confirmed a settlement that included monthly payments, loan forgiveness and money connected to a British visa, while saying he regarded the woman’s demands as blackmail and had discussed the situation with Epstein. He and his attorneys then refused to disclose how many NDAs he had signed, their terms or who else in his social circle had such agreements, arguing that confidentiality provisions prevented him from answering during a voluntary interview. Committee officials rejected that position and served Black with subpoenas for relevant documents and a later deposition. His lawyers denounced the move as a political stunt and abruptly ended the interview before lawmakers could fully question him about the $158 million in payments or the broader allegations surrounding his association with Epstein.


To contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75701056Mon, 12 Oct 2026 08:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciLeon Black used his appearance before the House Oversight Committee to defend his long-running relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and explain the extraordinary $158 million he paid him between 2013 and 2017. Black maintained that the money purchased...
The questioning became confrontational when committee investigators turned to Black’s relationships with women and nondisclosure agreements. Black acknowledged a six-year extramarital affair and confirmed a settlement that included monthly payments, loan forgiveness and money connected to a British visa, while saying he regarded the woman’s demands as blackmail and had discussed the situation with Epstein. He and his attorneys then refused to disclose how many NDAs he had signed, their terms or who else in his social circle had such agreements, arguing that confidentiality provisions prevented him from answering during a voluntary interview. Committee officials rejected that position and served Black with subpoenas for relevant documents and a later deposition. His lawyers denounced the move as a political stunt and abruptly ended the interview before lawmakers could fully question him about the $158 million in payments or the broader allegations surrounding his association with Epstein.


To contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3739epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bill-barr-and-his-epstein-related-narrative-10-11-26--75701055
Barr later said he personally reviewed the circumstances surrounding Epstein’s death and remained convinced it was suicide. He characterized what happened at the MCC as a convergence of catastrophic mistakes, including staffing failures, missed checks and other procedural breakdowns that allowed Epstein to be left in a position where he could kill himself. At the same time, Barr acknowledged how damaging the episode was because Epstein died before trial, denying survivors the chance to confront him in court and fueling suspicion about what had happened. Barr repeatedly said the failures had to be investigated and people held accountable, while maintaining that the evidence ultimately supported suicide rather than homicide.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75701055Mon, 12 Oct 2026 06:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBill Barr said publicly that Jeffrey Epstein died by suicide, but he also described the failures at the Metropolitan Correctional Center as extraordinary and unacceptable. Immediately after Epstein’s death on August 10, 2019, Barr said he was...
Barr later said he personally reviewed the circumstances surrounding Epstein’s death and remained convinced it was suicide. He characterized what happened at the MCC as a convergence of catastrophic mistakes, including staffing failures, missed checks and other procedural breakdowns that allowed Epstein to be left in a position where he could kill himself. At the same time, Barr acknowledged how damaging the episode was because Epstein died before trial, denying survivors the chance to confront him in court and fueling suspicion about what had happened. Barr repeatedly said the failures had to be investigated and people held accountable, while maintaining that the evidence ultimately supported suicide rather than homicide.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2594epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-bryan-kohberger-is-playing-the-long-game--75700975
Kohberger's defense argued that the intense pretrial publicity had tainted the local jury pool, making it impossible to find impartial jurors. While the defense has suggested moving the trial to Ada County, home to Boise, the exact new location will be determined by Idaho’s Supreme Court. The trial, originally scheduled to start in June 2025, could see significant logistical challenges due to its high profile and the expected length of three months.

The decision to move the trial has been met with mixed reactions. While legal experts agree that a fair trial would be difficult in Latah County, the family of one of the victims, Kaylee Goncalves, expressed disappointment, believing the trial should remain in the community most affected by the tragedy.

In this episode, we keep the conversation going about the latest order by Judge Judge.  



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75700975Mon, 12 Oct 2026 04:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBryan Kohberger, the man accused of murdering four University of Idaho students in 2022, recently had his request for a venue change granted by Judge John Judge of Idaho’s 2nd Judicial District. The judge expressed concerns that Kohberger would not...
Kohberger's defense argued that the intense pretrial publicity had tainted the local jury pool, making it impossible to find impartial jurors. While the defense has suggested moving the trial to Ada County, home to Boise, the exact new location will be determined by Idaho’s Supreme Court. The trial, originally scheduled to start in June 2025, could see significant logistical challenges due to its high profile and the expected length of three months.

The decision to move the trial has been met with mixed reactions. While legal experts agree that a fair trial would be difficult in Latah County, the family of one of the victims, Kaylee Goncalves, expressed disappointment, believing the trial should remain in the community most affected by the tragedy.

In this episode, we keep the conversation going about the latest order by Judge Judge.  



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>809bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-trial-of-bryan-kohberger-and-the-looming-delay--75700974

Enter Bryan Kohberger and his murder trial and we have seen all of that and more and we will, unfortunately, continue to see things get pushed around and reshuffled as we move forward. The question is, when the music stops, will Bryan Kohberger be left without a chair?


Let's dive in!





to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Bryan Kohberger trial fiasco sparks anger as judge delays until March 2025 - two and a half years after heinous Idaho murders | Daily Mail Online

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75700974Mon, 12 Oct 2026 02:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe average time it takes to prosecute death penalty cases in Idaho can vary widely due to several factors, including the complexity of the case, legal procedures, appeals processes, and resource availability. Generally, these cases can take several...

Enter Bryan Kohberger and his murder trial and we have seen all of that and more and we will, unfortunately, continue to see things get pushed around and reshuffled as we move forward. The question is, when the music stops, will Bryan Kohberger be left without a chair?


Let's dive in!





to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Bryan Kohberger trial fiasco sparks anger as judge delays until March 2025 - two and a half years after heinous Idaho murders | Daily Mail Online

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>965bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-criticism-surrounding-the-decision-to-postpone-the-kohberger-trial-the-first-time-around--75708226

The criticism also reflected a broader tension between Kohberger’s constitutional right to a fair trial and the public’s expectation that the justice system operate without unnecessary delay. Supporters of the continuance emphasized that rushing a case of this magnitude could create appellate problems later, especially if the defense could show it had been denied adequate time to investigate evidence, prepare experts or challenge the prosecution’s case. Critics countered that delays can also damage a prosecution by allowing memories to fade, witnesses to become harder to locate and public confidence to erode. In the Kohberger case, every postponement became magnified because of the intense national attention surrounding the murders, and the trial delay came to symbolize the larger frustration over how slowly one of the country’s most closely watched murder prosecutions was moving.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75708226Mon, 12 Oct 2026 00:30:28 +0000Bobby CapucciThere was significant criticism when Bryan Kohberger’s murder trial was pushed back, largely because the case had already been moving slowly and the families of the victims had been waiting years for a resolution. The delay was tied to the enormous...

The criticism also reflected a broader tension between Kohberger’s constitutional right to a fair trial and the public’s expectation that the justice system operate without unnecessary delay. Supporters of the continuance emphasized that rushing a case of this magnitude could create appellate problems later, especially if the defense could show it had been denied adequate time to investigate evidence, prepare experts or challenge the prosecution’s case. Critics countered that delays can also damage a prosecution by allowing memories to fade, witnesses to become harder to locate and public confidence to erode. In the Kohberger case, every postponement became magnified because of the intense national attention surrounding the murders, and the trial delay came to symbolize the larger frustration over how slowly one of the country’s most closely watched murder prosecutions was moving.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>856epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcript-day-4-part-4-10-11-26--75693486

The state also spent a significant portion of the day strengthening the forensic connection between Robinson and the physical evidence. Investigators testified that Robinson’s DNA was found on numerous portions of the rifle recovered near Utah Valley University, including the stock, grips, trigger area, bolt and barrel, as well as on ammunition associated with the weapon. An ATF analysis also linked a rotary engraving tool recovered from Robinson’s residence to markings found on cartridge cases, supporting the prosecution’s allegation that ammunition had been engraved before the shooting. At the same time, the forensic evidence was not absolute across the board: investigators could not conclusively determine that the bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Kirk’s autopsy had been fired from the recovered rifle. By the end of the fourth day, however, prosecutors had combined Robinson’s alleged admissions, Twiggs’ account, the handwritten note, surveillance evidence and extensive DNA testimony into their clearest presentation yet of why they believe Robinson was the shooter.







to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75693486Sun, 11 Oct 2026 22:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay four of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing, held July 9, centered on some of the prosecution’s most consequential evidence yet, including a recorded interview with Robinson’s former roommate and romantic partner, Lance Twiggs. In the interview,...

The state also spent a significant portion of the day strengthening the forensic connection between Robinson and the physical evidence. Investigators testified that Robinson’s DNA was found on numerous portions of the rifle recovered near Utah Valley University, including the stock, grips, trigger area, bolt and barrel, as well as on ammunition associated with the weapon. An ATF analysis also linked a rotary engraving tool recovered from Robinson’s residence to markings found on cartridge cases, supporting the prosecution’s allegation that ammunition had been engraved before the shooting. At the same time, the forensic evidence was not absolute across the board: investigators could not conclusively determine that the bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Kirk’s autopsy had been fired from the recovered rifle. By the end of the fourth day, however, prosecutors had combined Robinson’s alleged admissions, Twiggs’ account, the handwritten note, surveillance evidence and extensive DNA testimony into their clearest presentation yet of why they believe Robinson was the shooter.







to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>668epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcript-day-4-part-3-10-11-26--75693488

The state also spent a significant portion of the day strengthening the forensic connection between Robinson and the physical evidence. Investigators testified that Robinson’s DNA was found on numerous portions of the rifle recovered near Utah Valley University, including the stock, grips, trigger area, bolt and barrel, as well as on ammunition associated with the weapon. An ATF analysis also linked a rotary engraving tool recovered from Robinson’s residence to markings found on cartridge cases, supporting the prosecution’s allegation that ammunition had been engraved before the shooting. At the same time, the forensic evidence was not absolute across the board: investigators could not conclusively determine that the bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Kirk’s autopsy had been fired from the recovered rifle. By the end of the fourth day, however, prosecutors had combined Robinson’s alleged admissions, Twiggs’ account, the handwritten note, surveillance evidence and extensive DNA testimony into their clearest presentation yet of why they believe Robinson was the shooter.







to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75693488Sun, 11 Oct 2026 20:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay four of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing, held July 9, centered on some of the prosecution’s most consequential evidence yet, including a recorded interview with Robinson’s former roommate and romantic partner, Lance Twiggs. In the interview,...

The state also spent a significant portion of the day strengthening the forensic connection between Robinson and the physical evidence. Investigators testified that Robinson’s DNA was found on numerous portions of the rifle recovered near Utah Valley University, including the stock, grips, trigger area, bolt and barrel, as well as on ammunition associated with the weapon. An ATF analysis also linked a rotary engraving tool recovered from Robinson’s residence to markings found on cartridge cases, supporting the prosecution’s allegation that ammunition had been engraved before the shooting. At the same time, the forensic evidence was not absolute across the board: investigators could not conclusively determine that the bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Kirk’s autopsy had been fired from the recovered rifle. By the end of the fourth day, however, prosecutors had combined Robinson’s alleged admissions, Twiggs’ account, the handwritten note, surveillance evidence and extensive DNA testimony into their clearest presentation yet of why they believe Robinson was the shooter.







to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>891epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/epstein-survivors-amend-their-lawsuit-filed-against-the-u-s-government-part-2-10-11-26--75693489
At the heart of the lawsuit is the claim that the government’s failures were not abstract bureaucratic mistakes but a direct cause of additional women and girls being victimized. The plaintiffs allege that if the FBI and DOJ had acted on the information they possessed, Epstein would have been stopped years earlier and many of the assaults described in the complaint would never have occurred. They are pursuing negligence claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act, including theories based on the voluntary-undertaking and zone-of-risk doctrines, and seek monetary damages for physical injuries, psychological trauma, lost earnings, medical expenses and other harm. The complaint goes so far as to allege that repeated federal inaction allowed Epstein and others to continue a sex-trafficking conspiracy for nearly 25 years, making this lawsuit not simply an attack on Epstein’s conduct, but a direct attempt to hold the federal government financially and legally accountable for failing to intervene when it allegedly had repeated opportunities to do so


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

epstein-victims-fbi-fourth-complaint.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75693489Sun, 11 Oct 2026 18:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe fourth amended complaint, filed in the Southern District of Florida by more than 30 Jeffrey Epstein survivors against the United States, accuses the FBI and DOJ of decades of negligence that allegedly allowed Epstein’s abuse and trafficking...
At the heart of the lawsuit is the claim that the government’s failures were not abstract bureaucratic mistakes but a direct cause of additional women and girls being victimized. The plaintiffs allege that if the FBI and DOJ had acted on the information they possessed, Epstein would have been stopped years earlier and many of the assaults described in the complaint would never have occurred. They are pursuing negligence claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act, including theories based on the voluntary-undertaking and zone-of-risk doctrines, and seek monetary damages for physical injuries, psychological trauma, lost earnings, medical expenses and other harm. The complaint goes so far as to allege that repeated federal inaction allowed Epstein and others to continue a sex-trafficking conspiracy for nearly 25 years, making this lawsuit not simply an attack on Epstein’s conduct, but a direct attempt to hold the federal government financially and legally accountable for failing to intervene when it allegedly had repeated opportunities to do so


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

epstein-victims-fbi-fourth-complaint.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1081epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/epstein-survivors-amend-their-lawsuit-filed-against-the-u-s-government-part-1-10-11-26--75693487
At the heart of the lawsuit is the claim that the government’s failures were not abstract bureaucratic mistakes but a direct cause of additional women and girls being victimized. The plaintiffs allege that if the FBI and DOJ had acted on the information they possessed, Epstein would have been stopped years earlier and many of the assaults described in the complaint would never have occurred. They are pursuing negligence claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act, including theories based on the voluntary-undertaking and zone-of-risk doctrines, and seek monetary damages for physical injuries, psychological trauma, lost earnings, medical expenses and other harm. The complaint goes so far as to allege that repeated federal inaction allowed Epstein and others to continue a sex-trafficking conspiracy for nearly 25 years, making this lawsuit not simply an attack on Epstein’s conduct, but a direct attempt to hold the federal government financially and legally accountable for failing to intervene when it allegedly had repeated opportunities to do so


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

epstein-victims-fbi-fourth-complaint.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75693487Sun, 11 Oct 2026 16:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe fourth amended complaint, filed in the Southern District of Florida by more than 30 Jeffrey Epstein survivors against the United States, accuses the FBI and DOJ of decades of negligence that allegedly allowed Epstein’s abuse and trafficking...
At the heart of the lawsuit is the claim that the government’s failures were not abstract bureaucratic mistakes but a direct cause of additional women and girls being victimized. The plaintiffs allege that if the FBI and DOJ had acted on the information they possessed, Epstein would have been stopped years earlier and many of the assaults described in the complaint would never have occurred. They are pursuing negligence claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act, including theories based on the voluntary-undertaking and zone-of-risk doctrines, and seek monetary damages for physical injuries, psychological trauma, lost earnings, medical expenses and other harm. The complaint goes so far as to allege that repeated federal inaction allowed Epstein and others to continue a sex-trafficking conspiracy for nearly 25 years, making this lawsuit not simply an attack on Epstein’s conduct, but a direct attempt to hold the federal government financially and legally accountable for failing to intervene when it allegedly had repeated opportunities to do so


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

epstein-victims-fbi-fourth-complaint.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>717epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-dubin-family-ghislaine-maxwell-and-the-swedish-girl-10-11-26--75690169
Rizzo’s testimony placed the Dubin household directly in the chain of events surrounding the girl, though he did not accuse Glenn or Eva Dubin of sexually abusing her. He said Eva introduced the teenager as someone who would be working for the family, reportedly as a nanny or similar household employee, and Rizzo later saw the girl again about a month later traveling with the Dubin family on a private flight to Sweden. The account became significant because it linked Epstein and Maxwell’s alleged control over a vulnerable teenager to one of their closest social circles and raised questions about what people around them knew or should have recognized. Epstein was later questioned under oath about Rizzo, the Swedish girl and whether he and Maxwell had brought her to the United States under false pretenses, but he repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment rather than answer. The Dubins have denied wrongdoing and disputed allegations connecting them to Epstein’s abuse, but Rizzo’s deposition remains one of the most troubling firsthand accounts describing how a young girl allegedly moved from Epstein and Maxwell’s orbit directly into the home of their close friends.




to contact me:


bobbycapucci!protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75690169Sun, 11 Oct 2026 14:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciRinaldo Rizzo, who worked for Glenn and Eva Andersson-Dubin, gave sworn testimony describing a deeply disturbing encounter with a 15-year-old Swedish girl who had been brought to the Dubins’ home by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in late 2004...
Rizzo’s testimony placed the Dubin household directly in the chain of events surrounding the girl, though he did not accuse Glenn or Eva Dubin of sexually abusing her. He said Eva introduced the teenager as someone who would be working for the family, reportedly as a nanny or similar household employee, and Rizzo later saw the girl again about a month later traveling with the Dubin family on a private flight to Sweden. The account became significant because it linked Epstein and Maxwell’s alleged control over a vulnerable teenager to one of their closest social circles and raised questions about what people around them knew or should have recognized. Epstein was later questioned under oath about Rizzo, the Swedish girl and whether he and Maxwell had brought her to the United States under false pretenses, but he repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment rather than answer. The Dubins have denied wrongdoing and disputed allegations connecting them to Epstein’s abuse, but Rizzo’s deposition remains one of the most troubling firsthand accounts describing how a young girl allegedly moved from Epstein and Maxwell’s orbit directly into the home of their close friends.




to contact me:


bobbycapucci!protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2780epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-his-butlers-10-11-26--75690168
Epstein’s longtime butler in Paris was Valdson Vieira Cotrin, a Franco-Brazilian household employee who began working for Epstein in 2001 and helped run his massive apartment at 22 Avenue Foch. Cotrin later spoke with French investigators and described the constant stream of young women who came through Epstein’s Paris residence, including visits connected to massages and social gatherings. He also told investigators about traveling with Epstein to Saint-Tropez, where he recalled numerous young women cycling through during extended stays, though he said the women he personally saw there appeared to be adults. Cotrin’s testimony became important after Epstein’s death as French authorities investigated his activities in France and searched the Avenue Foch apartment. Like Alessi in Palm Beach, Cotrin was not simply an occasional employee; he was someone embedded in the daily operation of one of Epstein’s major residences and therefore possessed firsthand knowledge of who came and went and how the household was run.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75690168Sun, 11 Oct 2026 12:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJuan Alessi was one of Jeffrey Epstein’s longest-serving household employees and a key firsthand witness to how Epstein’s Palm Beach operation functioned. Alessi began working full-time for Epstein in January 1991 and remained until the end of 2002,...
Epstein’s longtime butler in Paris was Valdson Vieira Cotrin, a Franco-Brazilian household employee who began working for Epstein in 2001 and helped run his massive apartment at 22 Avenue Foch. Cotrin later spoke with French investigators and described the constant stream of young women who came through Epstein’s Paris residence, including visits connected to massages and social gatherings. He also told investigators about traveling with Epstein to Saint-Tropez, where he recalled numerous young women cycling through during extended stays, though he said the women he personally saw there appeared to be adults. Cotrin’s testimony became important after Epstein’s death as French authorities investigated his activities in France and searched the Avenue Foch apartment. Like Alessi in Palm Beach, Cotrin was not simply an occasional employee; he was someone embedded in the daily operation of one of Epstein’s major residences and therefore possessed firsthand knowledge of who came and went and how the household was run.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3038epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-ted-waitt-and-the-transcript-from-his-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-8-11-10-11-26--75690172
Waitt said he wanted Maxwell to stop working for Epstein because Epstein was her former boyfriend, but claimed he had no knowledge at the time of their criminal conduct and never witnessed abuse, coercion or trafficking. He repeatedly said he could not confirm how much work Maxwell continued doing for Epstein while they dated, despite their seven-year relationship, and he denied knowing whether Epstein manipulated or abused her. Waitt also acknowledged that Maxwell had been around his four children, three of whom were girls, and said that had he known then what he knows now, he never would have befriended her or allowed her near them. His testimony largely presented him as someone who was intimately involved with Maxwell for years while remaining unaware of the reality of her relationship with Epstein and the crimes for which she was later convicted.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

GO120551

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75690172Sun, 11 Oct 2026 10:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciTed Waitt told the House Oversight Committee that he met Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein at a Hong Kong dinner in November 2003 and began dating Maxwell the following year, remaining in a relationship with her until September 2010. Waitt...
Waitt said he wanted Maxwell to stop working for Epstein because Epstein was her former boyfriend, but claimed he had no knowledge at the time of their criminal conduct and never witnessed abuse, coercion or trafficking. He repeatedly said he could not confirm how much work Maxwell continued doing for Epstein while they dated, despite their seven-year relationship, and he denied knowing whether Epstein manipulated or abused her. Waitt also acknowledged that Maxwell had been around his four children, three of whom were girls, and said that had he known then what he knows now, he never would have befriended her or allowed her near them. His testimony largely presented him as someone who was intimately involved with Maxwell for years while remaining unaware of the reality of her relationship with Epstein and the crimes for which she was later convicted.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

GO120551

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3371falsefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-ted-waitt-and-the-transcript-from-his-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-4-7-10-11-26--75690171
Waitt said he wanted Maxwell to stop working for Epstein because Epstein was her former boyfriend, but claimed he had no knowledge at the time of their criminal conduct and never witnessed abuse, coercion or trafficking. He repeatedly said he could not confirm how much work Maxwell continued doing for Epstein while they dated, despite their seven-year relationship, and he denied knowing whether Epstein manipulated or abused her. Waitt also acknowledged that Maxwell had been around his four children, three of whom were girls, and said that had he known then what he knows now, he never would have befriended her or allowed her near them. His testimony largely presented him as someone who was intimately involved with Maxwell for years while remaining unaware of the reality of her relationship with Epstein and the crimes for which she was later convicted.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

GO120551

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75690171Sun, 11 Oct 2026 08:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciTed Waitt told the House Oversight Committee that he met Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein at a Hong Kong dinner in November 2003 and began dating Maxwell the following year, remaining in a relationship with her until September 2010. Waitt...
Waitt said he wanted Maxwell to stop working for Epstein because Epstein was her former boyfriend, but claimed he had no knowledge at the time of their criminal conduct and never witnessed abuse, coercion or trafficking. He repeatedly said he could not confirm how much work Maxwell continued doing for Epstein while they dated, despite their seven-year relationship, and he denied knowing whether Epstein manipulated or abused her. Waitt also acknowledged that Maxwell had been around his four children, three of whom were girls, and said that had he known then what he knows now, he never would have befriended her or allowed her near them. His testimony largely presented him as someone who was intimately involved with Maxwell for years while remaining unaware of the reality of her relationship with Epstein and the crimes for which she was later convicted.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

GO120551

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3036epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-ted-waitt-and-the-transcript-from-his-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-1-3-10-10-26--75690170
Waitt said he wanted Maxwell to stop working for Epstein because Epstein was her former boyfriend, but claimed he had no knowledge at the time of their criminal conduct and never witnessed abuse, coercion or trafficking. He repeatedly said he could not confirm how much work Maxwell continued doing for Epstein while they dated, despite their seven-year relationship, and he denied knowing whether Epstein manipulated or abused her. Waitt also acknowledged that Maxwell had been around his four children, three of whom were girls, and said that had he known then what he knows now, he never would have befriended her or allowed her near them. His testimony largely presented him as someone who was intimately involved with Maxwell for years while remaining unaware of the reality of her relationship with Epstein and the crimes for which she was later convicted.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

GO120551

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75690170Sun, 11 Oct 2026 06:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciTed Waitt told the House Oversight Committee that he met Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein at a Hong Kong dinner in November 2003 and began dating Maxwell the following year, remaining in a relationship with her until September 2010. Waitt...
Waitt said he wanted Maxwell to stop working for Epstein because Epstein was her former boyfriend, but claimed he had no knowledge at the time of their criminal conduct and never witnessed abuse, coercion or trafficking. He repeatedly said he could not confirm how much work Maxwell continued doing for Epstein while they dated, despite their seven-year relationship, and he denied knowing whether Epstein manipulated or abused her. Waitt also acknowledged that Maxwell had been around his four children, three of whom were girls, and said that had he known then what he knows now, he never would have befriended her or allowed her near them. His testimony largely presented him as someone who was intimately involved with Maxwell for years while remaining unaware of the reality of her relationship with Epstein and the crimes for which she was later convicted.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

GO120551

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2392epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-bobby-chacon-and-his-take-on-the-murders--75690715
Chacon was particularly struck by cellphone evidence suggesting Kohberger returned to the area of the King Road house around 9 a.m. the morning after the killings. He described revisiting a crime scene as behavior sometimes seen in offenders who want to observe the aftermath of what they have done, speculating that Kohberger may have expected to see police cars, ambulances and emergency activity outside the home. Chacon considered the possibility that Kohberger returned because he realized he had left the knife sheath behind, but said he thought it was more likely that he went back to see the “fruits” of his actions. He viewed that alleged return, when considered alongside the vehicle, cellphone and other evidence, as one of the more disturbing aspects of the case and as potentially important evidence of the killer’s mindset after the murders.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75690715Sun, 11 Oct 2026 04:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciFormer FBI special agent Bobby Chacon said the Moscow murders appeared to involve a killer who had gone into the King Road house with a plan, even if that plan did not unfold exactly as intended. In discussing Bryan Kohberger after his arrest, Chacon...
Chacon was particularly struck by cellphone evidence suggesting Kohberger returned to the area of the King Road house around 9 a.m. the morning after the killings. He described revisiting a crime scene as behavior sometimes seen in offenders who want to observe the aftermath of what they have done, speculating that Kohberger may have expected to see police cars, ambulances and emergency activity outside the home. Chacon considered the possibility that Kohberger returned because he realized he had left the knife sheath behind, but said he thought it was more likely that he went back to see the “fruits” of his actions. He viewed that alleged return, when considered alongside the vehicle, cellphone and other evidence, as one of the more disturbing aspects of the case and as potentially important evidence of the killer’s mindset after the murders.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>664bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/social-media-lawsuits-and-the-murders-in-moscow--75690714
The broader concern was that amateur sleuthing was not simply creating bad information, but potentially damaging innocent people and interfering with the investigation. Bergman said false accusations can follow a person permanently once they go viral, and pointed to the Richard Jewell case as an example of the damage caused when someone is wrongly associated with a major crime. He said people targeted by these accusations could send cease-and-desist letters, demand retractions and potentially pursue lawsuits against those responsible. His message to internet investigators was essentially that they were not law enforcement and should stop publicly naming people based on speculation, because doing so could compound the trauma surrounding the murders while also creating serious legal exposure for the people spreading the accusations.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75690714Sun, 11 Oct 2026 02:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe article focused on the wave of online speculation that exploded during the early stages of the University of Idaho murder investigation, when police had not yet identified a suspect and social media users began publicly accusing friends,...
The broader concern was that amateur sleuthing was not simply creating bad information, but potentially damaging innocent people and interfering with the investigation. Bergman said false accusations can follow a person permanently once they go viral, and pointed to the Richard Jewell case as an example of the damage caused when someone is wrongly associated with a major crime. He said people targeted by these accusations could send cease-and-desist letters, demand retractions and potentially pursue lawsuits against those responsible. His message to internet investigators was essentially that they were not law enforcement and should stop publicly naming people based on speculation, because doing so could compound the trauma surrounding the murders while also creating serious legal exposure for the people spreading the accusations.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1043bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/epstein-survivor-annie-farmer-calls-on-ohio-state-to-remove-wexner-s-name-10-10-26--75690652
The push has put renewed pressure on Ohio State, which is still reviewing hundreds of requests to remove the Wexner name from campus facilities, including the Wexner Medical Center and the Les Wexner Football Complex. Farmer also criticized the university’s years-long legal fight with Strauss survivors, noting the bitter irony that students who suffer sexual assault are directed to a medical center carrying Wexner’s name. Strauss survivors Michael DiSabato and Al Washington Sr. joined Farmer in calling for the name to come down, arguing that the university cannot credibly claim to support survivors while continuing to honor one of its most powerful former trustees amid the unresolved questions surrounding his relationship with Epstein. Ohio State has said it has a formal review process for renaming buildings and that any removal ultimately requires approval from its Board of Trustees.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Epstein survivor Annie Farmer supports drive to remove Leslie Wexner’s name from OSU campus

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75690652Sun, 11 Oct 2026 00:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJeffrey Epstein survivor Annie Farmer has joined the campaign to remove Les Wexner’s name from buildings at Ohio State University, aligning herself with survivors of former OSU team doctor Richard Strauss, who sexually abused hundreds of students....
The push has put renewed pressure on Ohio State, which is still reviewing hundreds of requests to remove the Wexner name from campus facilities, including the Wexner Medical Center and the Les Wexner Football Complex. Farmer also criticized the university’s years-long legal fight with Strauss survivors, noting the bitter irony that students who suffer sexual assault are directed to a medical center carrying Wexner’s name. Strauss survivors Michael DiSabato and Al Washington Sr. joined Farmer in calling for the name to come down, arguing that the university cannot credibly claim to support survivors while continuing to honor one of its most powerful former trustees amid the unresolved questions surrounding his relationship with Epstein. Ohio State has said it has a formal review process for renaming buildings and that any removal ultimately requires approval from its Board of Trustees.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Epstein survivor Annie Farmer supports drive to remove Leslie Wexner’s name from OSU campus

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>769epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/judge-rules-search-warrants-used-against-prince-andrew-were-unlawful-10-10-26--75690152
The ruling was a meaningful legal victory for Andrew, but it did not end the criminal investigation or amount to a finding that the underlying allegations were unfounded. Police said their investigation into possible misconduct in public office remains active, and the High Court specifically emphasized that invalidating the warrants did not invalidate the investigation itself. The next major fight concerns what happens to the material police seized under those unlawful warrants: authorities are seeking permission to retain at least some of it, with further proceedings expected to determine whether it can still be lawfully used. The investigation grew out of renewed scrutiny of Andrew’s dealings with Epstein while Andrew served as Britain’s trade envoy, including allegations stemming from released Epstein-related records that he shared sensitive or official information with Epstein. Andrew has denied wrongdoing and has not been charged.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Judge says search warrants used to seize property from former Prince Andrew were unlawful

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75690152Sat, 10 Oct 2026 22:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciA London High Court judge ruled that the search warrants used by Thames Valley Police to raid the homes of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, formerly Prince Andrew, were unlawful because police sought them under the wrong section of the Police and Criminal...
The ruling was a meaningful legal victory for Andrew, but it did not end the criminal investigation or amount to a finding that the underlying allegations were unfounded. Police said their investigation into possible misconduct in public office remains active, and the High Court specifically emphasized that invalidating the warrants did not invalidate the investigation itself. The next major fight concerns what happens to the material police seized under those unlawful warrants: authorities are seeking permission to retain at least some of it, with further proceedings expected to determine whether it can still be lawfully used. The investigation grew out of renewed scrutiny of Andrew’s dealings with Epstein while Andrew served as Britain’s trade envoy, including allegations stemming from released Epstein-related records that he shared sensitive or official information with Epstein. Andrew has denied wrongdoing and has not been charged.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Judge says search warrants used to seize property from former Prince Andrew were unlawful

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>678epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/katie-phang-responds-to-todd-blanche-s-latest-motion-to-postpone-part-2-10-10-26--75677057
Phang’s team also attacked DOJ’s substantive argument that the administrative record was unnecessary because Blanche’s Rule 12(c) motion supposedly presented only legal questions and no disputed facts. They argued that the motion itself relied on agency records and raised factual issues, making the underlying administrative record potentially essential to determining whether DOJ’s actions were lawful. More broadly, the filing said Blanche had not met the standard required to justify reconsidering Sullivan’s previous rulings and accused DOJ of trying to recycle arguments it either already made or could have made earlier. Phang therefore asked Sullivan to deny the postponement request, immediately require Blanche to file the certified list of the administrative record, and keep the October 15 deadline for producing the full record intact. In blunt terms, the filing portrayed DOJ’s latest motion not as a legitimate scheduling dispute, but as another attempt to delay reaching the merits of the case after the court had already ordered the government to move forward.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.291779.55.0_13.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75677057Sat, 10 Oct 2026 20:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciKatie Phang’s lawyers asked Judge Emmet Sullivan to reject Todd Blanche’s latest attempt to postpone production of the administrative record in her lawsuit, arguing that DOJ had once again waited until the last possible moment to avoid a court-ordered...
Phang’s team also attacked DOJ’s substantive argument that the administrative record was unnecessary because Blanche’s Rule 12(c) motion supposedly presented only legal questions and no disputed facts. They argued that the motion itself relied on agency records and raised factual issues, making the underlying administrative record potentially essential to determining whether DOJ’s actions were lawful. More broadly, the filing said Blanche had not met the standard required to justify reconsidering Sullivan’s previous rulings and accused DOJ of trying to recycle arguments it either already made or could have made earlier. Phang therefore asked Sullivan to deny the postponement request, immediately require Blanche to file the certified list of the administrative record, and keep the October 15 deadline for producing the full record intact. In blunt terms, the filing portrayed DOJ’s latest motion not as a legitimate scheduling dispute, but as another attempt to delay reaching the merits of the case after the court had already ordered the government to move forward.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.291779.55.0_13.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>583epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/katie-phang-responds-to-todd-blanche-s-latest-motion-to-postpone-part-1-10-10-26--75677056
Phang’s team also attacked DOJ’s substantive argument that the administrative record was unnecessary because Blanche’s Rule 12(c) motion supposedly presented only legal questions and no disputed facts. They argued that the motion itself relied on agency records and raised factual issues, making the underlying administrative record potentially essential to determining whether DOJ’s actions were lawful. More broadly, the filing said Blanche had not met the standard required to justify reconsidering Sullivan’s previous rulings and accused DOJ of trying to recycle arguments it either already made or could have made earlier. Phang therefore asked Sullivan to deny the postponement request, immediately require Blanche to file the certified list of the administrative record, and keep the October 15 deadline for producing the full record intact. In blunt terms, the filing portrayed DOJ’s latest motion not as a legitimate scheduling dispute, but as another attempt to delay reaching the merits of the case after the court had already ordered the government to move forward.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.291779.55.0_13.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75677056Sat, 10 Oct 2026 18:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciKatie Phang’s lawyers asked Judge Emmet Sullivan to reject Todd Blanche’s latest attempt to postpone production of the administrative record in her lawsuit, arguing that DOJ had once again waited until the last possible moment to avoid a court-ordered...
Phang’s team also attacked DOJ’s substantive argument that the administrative record was unnecessary because Blanche’s Rule 12(c) motion supposedly presented only legal questions and no disputed facts. They argued that the motion itself relied on agency records and raised factual issues, making the underlying administrative record potentially essential to determining whether DOJ’s actions were lawful. More broadly, the filing said Blanche had not met the standard required to justify reconsidering Sullivan’s previous rulings and accused DOJ of trying to recycle arguments it either already made or could have made earlier. Phang therefore asked Sullivan to deny the postponement request, immediately require Blanche to file the certified list of the administrative record, and keep the October 15 deadline for producing the full record intact. In blunt terms, the filing portrayed DOJ’s latest motion not as a legitimate scheduling dispute, but as another attempt to delay reaching the merits of the case after the court had already ordered the government to move forward.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.291779.55.0_13.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>890epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/raskin-and-dean-send-doj-a-letter-demanding-a-botstein-investigation-10-10-26--75677058
The letter also delivers a broader attack on DOJ and the FBI for maintaining that their review of the Epstein files uncovered no evidence warranting investigations of additional uncharged associates. Raskin and Dean argue that the Botstein material directly challenges that position and accuse federal authorities of possessing the information for roughly 18 months without meaningfully pursuing it. They additionally question why DOJ releases allegedly exposed the young woman’s name hundreds of times and included images showing her face while Botstein’s email address was redacted, demanding to know who authorized that disparate treatment and why. Beyond Botstein, they call for investigations into other Epstein associates, naming Leon Black, Jes Staley, Les Wexner, Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem, Richard Kahn, Darren Indyke, Lesley Groff and Larry Visoski, while also demanding release of the complete Epstein files with survivor identities protected and congressional investigators given access to unredacted material. The fundamental argument of the letter is that the government cannot simultaneously claim there was insufficient evidence to investigate Epstein’s wider network while its own files contain communications that lawmakers say plainly warranted further inquiry.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75677058Sat, 10 Oct 2026 16:52:56 +0000Bobby CapucciReps. Jamie Raskin and Madeleine Dean are demanding that Attorney General Todd Blanche and FBI Director Kash Patel open a federal investigation into former Bard College president Leon Botstein after congressional investigators uncovered communications...
The letter also delivers a broader attack on DOJ and the FBI for maintaining that their review of the Epstein files uncovered no evidence warranting investigations of additional uncharged associates. Raskin and Dean argue that the Botstein material directly challenges that position and accuse federal authorities of possessing the information for roughly 18 months without meaningfully pursuing it. They additionally question why DOJ releases allegedly exposed the young woman’s name hundreds of times and included images showing her face while Botstein’s email address was redacted, demanding to know who authorized that disparate treatment and why. Beyond Botstein, they call for investigations into other Epstein associates, naming Leon Black, Jes Staley, Les Wexner, Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem, Richard Kahn, Darren Indyke, Lesley Groff and Larry Visoski, while also demanding release of the complete Epstein files with survivor identities protected and congressional investigators given access to unredacted material. The fundamental argument of the letter is that the government cannot simultaneously claim there was insufficient evidence to investigate Epstein’s wider network while its own files contain communications that lawmakers say plainly warranted further inquiry.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>609epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-what-happened-to-madalina-cojocari-10-10-26--75670618
What happened to Madalina remains unresolved. Authorities have treated her disappearance as a missing-child investigation and have repeatedly said they believe people close to the case know more than they have disclosed. Investigators examined conflicting statements from Diana and Palmiter, travel records, surveillance footage and reports that Madalina may have been seen with her mother after the date she was supposedly last seen at home. Despite extensive searches and national attention, no one has been charged with killing or abducting her, and no publicly confirmed evidence has established whether she ran away, was taken somewhere, or died. The long delay in reporting her disappearance remains one of the central mysteries of the case because it deprived investigators of critical early opportunities to find witnesses, preserve evidence and determine exactly what happened during the weeks when Madalina was missing but authorities had not yet been told.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75670618Sat, 10 Oct 2026 14:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciMadalina Cojocari was an 11-year-old girl from Cornelius, North Carolina, who disappeared in late 2022 under circumstances that immediately raised serious questions about the adults responsible for her. She was last seen publicly getting off a school...
What happened to Madalina remains unresolved. Authorities have treated her disappearance as a missing-child investigation and have repeatedly said they believe people close to the case know more than they have disclosed. Investigators examined conflicting statements from Diana and Palmiter, travel records, surveillance footage and reports that Madalina may have been seen with her mother after the date she was supposedly last seen at home. Despite extensive searches and national attention, no one has been charged with killing or abducting her, and no publicly confirmed evidence has established whether she ran away, was taken somewhere, or died. The long delay in reporting her disappearance remains one of the central mysteries of the case because it deprived investigators of critical early opportunities to find witnesses, preserve evidence and determine exactly what happened during the weeks when Madalina was missing but authorities had not yet been told.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2797breakingnews,coldcase,coldcases,crime,disappeared,missing,missingpeople,missingpersons,murder,news,newsupdate,podcast,talesofthemissing,thosewhohavevanished,truecrime,truecrimecommunity,truecrimepodcast,unsolvedmysteries,unsolvedmystery,vanishedtruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-supreme-court-and-it-s-decision-about-richard-allen-s-lawyers-10-10-26--75670617
The ruling did not give Allen everything he wanted. The Supreme Court refused his request to remove Gull from the case, finding that Allen had not overcome the legal presumption that she could remain impartial, and it also rejected his demand that his trial begin within 70 days because that request had not first been properly presented to the trial court. But the representation ruling was significant because it returned Baldwin and Rozzi to the defense team and established that a trial judge could not simply disqualify appointed counsel without carefully considering the defendant’s constitutional interests and less drastic alternatives. The decision effectively reversed one of the most controversial developments in the pretrial proceedings and allowed Allen to continue toward trial with the lawyers he had repeatedly said he wanted representing him.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75670617Sat, 10 Oct 2026 12:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn January 2024, the Indiana Supreme Court reinstated Richard Allen’s original court-appointed defense attorneys, Andrew Baldwin and Brad Rozzi, after Special Judge Fran Gull had removed them from the Delphi murders case months earlier. Gull had...
The ruling did not give Allen everything he wanted. The Supreme Court refused his request to remove Gull from the case, finding that Allen had not overcome the legal presumption that she could remain impartial, and it also rejected his demand that his trial begin within 70 days because that request had not first been properly presented to the trial court. But the representation ruling was significant because it returned Baldwin and Rozzi to the defense team and established that a trial judge could not simply disqualify appointed counsel without carefully considering the defendant’s constitutional interests and less drastic alternatives. The decision effectively reversed one of the most controversial developments in the pretrial proceedings and allowed Allen to continue toward trial with the lawyers he had repeatedly said he wanted representing him.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2943abigailwilliams,delphi,delphimurdernews,delphimurders,delphiupdates,libertygerman,richardallen,richardallennewsupdate,richardallentrial,richardallentrialnews,thedelphimurders,truecrime,truecrimedailynews,truecrimenews,truecrimenewsupdates,truecrimereport,truecrimeupdatestruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-doug-band-and-his-epstein-related-congressional-transcript-part-8-11-10-10-26--75670449
Band described a more substantial relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, admitting that they developed a friendship through Clinton’s orbit while firmly denying that it was ever romantic or physical. He said he began hearing troubling reports about Maxwell around 2011 and responded by removing her from Clinton’s contact lists and attempting to cut her out of the former president’s world. Much of the questioning focused on emails suggesting social familiarity, dinners, travel arrangements, birthday plans and flirtatious language, but Band repeatedly said he could not remember the communications or the events being discussed. His testimony therefore presented Epstein as a peripheral acquaintance and Maxwell as a former friend, while leaving lawmakers with numerous instances in which documentary records appeared more detailed than Band’s recollection.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75670449Sat, 10 Oct 2026 10:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDoug Band told the House Oversight Committee that his personal contact with Jeffrey Epstein was limited, infrequent and largely incidental to his work as Bill Clinton’s longtime aide. He said he barely knew Epstein, did not recall receiving gifts from...
Band described a more substantial relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, admitting that they developed a friendship through Clinton’s orbit while firmly denying that it was ever romantic or physical. He said he began hearing troubling reports about Maxwell around 2011 and responded by removing her from Clinton’s contact lists and attempting to cut her out of the former president’s world. Much of the questioning focused on emails suggesting social familiarity, dinners, travel arrangements, birthday plans and flirtatious language, but Band repeatedly said he could not remember the communications or the events being discussed. His testimony therefore presented Epstein as a peripheral acquaintance and Maxwell as a former friend, while leaving lawmakers with numerous instances in which documentary records appeared more detailed than Band’s recollection.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3700epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-doug-band-and-his-epstein-related-congressional-transcript-part-4-7--75670448
Band described a more substantial relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, admitting that they developed a friendship through Clinton’s orbit while firmly denying that it was ever romantic or physical. He said he began hearing troubling reports about Maxwell around 2011 and responded by removing her from Clinton’s contact lists and attempting to cut her out of the former president’s world. Much of the questioning focused on emails suggesting social familiarity, dinners, travel arrangements, birthday plans and flirtatious language, but Band repeatedly said he could not remember the communications or the events being discussed. His testimony therefore presented Epstein as a peripheral acquaintance and Maxwell as a former friend, while leaving lawmakers with numerous instances in which documentary records appeared more detailed than Band’s recollection.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75670448Sat, 10 Oct 2026 08:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDoug Band told the House Oversight Committee that his personal contact with Jeffrey Epstein was limited, infrequent and largely incidental to his work as Bill Clinton’s longtime aide. He said he barely knew Epstein, did not recall receiving gifts from...
Band described a more substantial relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, admitting that they developed a friendship through Clinton’s orbit while firmly denying that it was ever romantic or physical. He said he began hearing troubling reports about Maxwell around 2011 and responded by removing her from Clinton’s contact lists and attempting to cut her out of the former president’s world. Much of the questioning focused on emails suggesting social familiarity, dinners, travel arrangements, birthday plans and flirtatious language, but Band repeatedly said he could not remember the communications or the events being discussed. His testimony therefore presented Epstein as a peripheral acquaintance and Maxwell as a former friend, while leaving lawmakers with numerous instances in which documentary records appeared more detailed than Band’s recollection.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2933epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-doug-band-and-his-epstein-related-congressional-transcript-part-1-3-10-10-26--75670450
Band described a more substantial relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, admitting that they developed a friendship through Clinton’s orbit while firmly denying that it was ever romantic or physical. He said he began hearing troubling reports about Maxwell around 2011 and responded by removing her from Clinton’s contact lists and attempting to cut her out of the former president’s world. Much of the questioning focused on emails suggesting social familiarity, dinners, travel arrangements, birthday plans and flirtatious language, but Band repeatedly said he could not remember the communications or the events being discussed. His testimony therefore presented Epstein as a peripheral acquaintance and Maxwell as a former friend, while leaving lawmakers with numerous instances in which documentary records appeared more detailed than Band’s recollection.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75670450Sat, 10 Oct 2026 06:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDoug Band told the House Oversight Committee that his personal contact with Jeffrey Epstein was limited, infrequent and largely incidental to his work as Bill Clinton’s longtime aide. He said he barely knew Epstein, did not recall receiving gifts from...
Band described a more substantial relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, admitting that they developed a friendship through Clinton’s orbit while firmly denying that it was ever romantic or physical. He said he began hearing troubling reports about Maxwell around 2011 and responded by removing her from Clinton’s contact lists and attempting to cut her out of the former president’s world. Much of the questioning focused on emails suggesting social familiarity, dinners, travel arrangements, birthday plans and flirtatious language, but Band repeatedly said he could not remember the communications or the events being discussed. His testimony therefore presented Epstein as a peripheral acquaintance and Maxwell as a former friend, while leaving lawmakers with numerous instances in which documentary records appeared more detailed than Band’s recollection.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

Band-Final-Transcript-7.16.26.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2422epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-criminologist-casey-jordan-gives-her-take-on-the-murders--75670803
Jordan later went further and rejected the popular theory that Kohberger killed because he wanted to be part of the victims’ social circle and was rejected. She instead framed the murders as potentially consistent with an incel-type grievance rooted in sexual and social isolation, powerlessness and resentment toward women. She pointed to reports about Kohberger’s lack of meaningful romantic relationships and theorized that he may have selected the King Road house because it provided an opportunity to watch and approach the victims rather than because he personally knew them. Jordan has consistently treated the crime as fantasy-driven and predatory, not simply as retaliation against one particular victim. That remains her interpretation rather than an established motive, and authorities have never publicly identified a definitive motive for the murders.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75670803Sat, 10 Oct 2026 04:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciCasey Jordan argued early on that the Moscow murders looked less like a spontaneous crime of passion and more like the work of an organized offender acting out a violent fantasy. She said the lack of an obvious motive, the nighttime entry into the...
Jordan later went further and rejected the popular theory that Kohberger killed because he wanted to be part of the victims’ social circle and was rejected. She instead framed the murders as potentially consistent with an incel-type grievance rooted in sexual and social isolation, powerlessness and resentment toward women. She pointed to reports about Kohberger’s lack of meaningful romantic relationships and theorized that he may have selected the King Road house because it provided an opportunity to watch and approach the victims rather than because he personally knew them. Jordan has consistently treated the crime as fantasy-driven and predatory, not simply as retaliation against one particular victim. That remains her interpretation rather than an established motive, and authorities have never publicly identified a definitive motive for the murders.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>719bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-the-alternative-perpetrator-motion-and-inconclusive-data-motion-in-limine--75670664
​In Case No. CR01-24-31665, the State filed a Motion in Limine on February 21, 2025, to restrict the defense from introducing or arguing alternative perpetrator evidence without first meeting specific relevance and admissibility standards as outlined in the Idaho Rules of Evidence (I.R.E.) 401, 402, and 403. The State contends that during the investigation, thousands of tips regarding possible perpetrators were received, but none, except those related to the defendant, were substantiated. Allowing the defense to present alternative perpetrator theories without concrete evidence directly connecting others to the homicides could mislead and confuse the jury, result in undue delays, waste time, and unfairly prejudice the State's case.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

022425-Motion-inLimine5-RE-Inconclusive-Data.pdf


022125-States-Motion-in-Limine-RE-Alternative-Perpetrator-Evidence.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75670664Sat, 10 Oct 2026 02:20:02 +0000Bobby Capucci​In Case No. CR01-24-31665, the defense filed Motion in Limine #5 titled "Re: Inconclusive Data," seeking to exclude certain evidence deemed inconclusive. The court granted the defense's request to seal this motion, as indicated in an order dated...
​In Case No. CR01-24-31665, the State filed a Motion in Limine on February 21, 2025, to restrict the defense from introducing or arguing alternative perpetrator evidence without first meeting specific relevance and admissibility standards as outlined in the Idaho Rules of Evidence (I.R.E.) 401, 402, and 403. The State contends that during the investigation, thousands of tips regarding possible perpetrators were received, but none, except those related to the defendant, were substantiated. Allowing the defense to present alternative perpetrator theories without concrete evidence directly connecting others to the homicides could mislead and confuse the jury, result in undue delays, waste time, and unfairly prejudice the State's case.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

022425-Motion-inLimine5-RE-Inconclusive-Data.pdf


022125-States-Motion-in-Limine-RE-Alternative-Perpetrator-Evidence.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>613bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcript-day-4-part-2-10-9-26--75670390







Day four of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing, held July 9, centered on some of the prosecution’s most consequential evidence yet, including a recorded interview with Robinson’s former roommate and romantic partner, Lance Twiggs. In the interview, Twiggs described Robinson’s behavior after Charlie Kirk was killed and authenticated text exchanges in which Robinson allegedly admitted responsibility for the shooting, discussed the rifle and expressed concern that investigators would find his DNA on it. Twiggs also said Robinson later confirmed the confession in person and expressed regret about what he had done. Prosecutors additionally introduced Robinson’s handwritten note to Twiggs, which allegedly said that he had an opportunity to “take out Charlie Kirk” and took it, although Judge Tony Graf quickly ordered the image removed after it was inadvertently displayed publicly. Twiggs also identified Robinson in surveillance images with varying degrees of certainty, telling investigators that some of the later photographs definitely appeared to show him.


The state also spent a significant portion of the day strengthening the forensic connection between Robinson and the physical evidence. Investigators testified that Robinson’s DNA was found on numerous portions of the rifle recovered near Utah Valley University, including the stock, grips, trigger area, bolt and barrel, as well as on ammunition associated with the weapon. An ATF analysis also linked a rotary engraving tool recovered from Robinson’s residence to markings found on cartridge cases, supporting the prosecution’s allegation that ammunition had been engraved before the shooting. At the same time, the forensic evidence was not absolute across the board: investigators could not conclusively determine that the bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Kirk’s autopsy had been fired from the recovered rifle. By the end of the fourth day, however, prosecutors had combined Robinson’s alleged admissions, Twiggs’ account, the handwritten note, surveillance evidence and extensive DNA testimony into their clearest presentation yet of why they believe Robinson was the shooter.







to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75670390Sat, 10 Oct 2026 00:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay four of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing, held July 9, centered on some of the prosecution’s most consequential evidence yet, including a recorded interview with Robinson’s former roommate and romantic partner, Lance Twiggs. In the interview,...







Day four of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing, held July 9, centered on some of the prosecution’s most consequential evidence yet, including a recorded interview with Robinson’s former roommate and romantic partner, Lance Twiggs. In the interview, Twiggs described Robinson’s behavior after Charlie Kirk was killed and authenticated text exchanges in which Robinson allegedly admitted responsibility for the shooting, discussed the rifle and expressed concern that investigators would find his DNA on it. Twiggs also said Robinson later confirmed the confession in person and expressed regret about what he had done. Prosecutors additionally introduced Robinson’s handwritten note to Twiggs, which allegedly said that he had an opportunity to “take out Charlie Kirk” and took it, although Judge Tony Graf quickly ordered the image removed after it was inadvertently displayed publicly. Twiggs also identified Robinson in surveillance images with varying degrees of certainty, telling investigators that some of the later photographs definitely appeared to show him.


The state also spent a significant portion of the day strengthening the forensic connection between Robinson and the physical evidence. Investigators testified that Robinson’s DNA was found on numerous portions of the rifle recovered near Utah Valley University, including the stock, grips, trigger area, bolt and barrel, as well as on ammunition associated with the weapon. An ATF analysis also linked a rotary engraving tool recovered from Robinson’s residence to markings found on cartridge cases, supporting the prosecution’s allegation that ammunition had been engraved before the shooting. At the same time, the forensic evidence was not absolute across the board: investigators could not conclusively determine that the bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Kirk’s autopsy had been fired from the recovered rifle. By the end of the fourth day, however, prosecutors had combined Robinson’s alleged admissions, Twiggs’ account, the handwritten note, surveillance evidence and extensive DNA testimony into their clearest presentation yet of why they believe Robinson was the shooter.







to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>672breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcript-day-4-part-1-10-9-26--75670389







Day four of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing, held July 9, centered on some of the prosecution’s most consequential evidence yet, including a recorded interview with Robinson’s former roommate and romantic partner, Lance Twiggs. In the interview, Twiggs described Robinson’s behavior after Charlie Kirk was killed and authenticated text exchanges in which Robinson allegedly admitted responsibility for the shooting, discussed the rifle and expressed concern that investigators would find his DNA on it. Twiggs also said Robinson later confirmed the confession in person and expressed regret about what he had done. Prosecutors additionally introduced Robinson’s handwritten note to Twiggs, which allegedly said that he had an opportunity to “take out Charlie Kirk” and took it, although Judge Tony Graf quickly ordered the image removed after it was inadvertently displayed publicly. Twiggs also identified Robinson in surveillance images with varying degrees of certainty, telling investigators that some of the later photographs definitely appeared to show him.


The state also spent a significant portion of the day strengthening the forensic connection between Robinson and the physical evidence. Investigators testified that Robinson’s DNA was found on numerous portions of the rifle recovered near Utah Valley University, including the stock, grips, trigger area, bolt and barrel, as well as on ammunition associated with the weapon. An ATF analysis also linked a rotary engraving tool recovered from Robinson’s residence to markings found on cartridge cases, supporting the prosecution’s allegation that ammunition had been engraved before the shooting. At the same time, the forensic evidence was not absolute across the board: investigators could not conclusively determine that the bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Kirk’s autopsy had been fired from the recovered rifle. By the end of the fourth day, however, prosecutors had combined Robinson’s alleged admissions, Twiggs’ account, the handwritten note, surveillance evidence and extensive DNA testimony into their clearest presentation yet of why they believe Robinson was the shooter.







to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75670389Fri, 09 Oct 2026 22:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay four of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing, held July 9, centered on some of the prosecution’s most consequential evidence yet, including a recorded interview with Robinson’s former roommate and romantic partner, Lance Twiggs. In the interview,...







Day four of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing, held July 9, centered on some of the prosecution’s most consequential evidence yet, including a recorded interview with Robinson’s former roommate and romantic partner, Lance Twiggs. In the interview, Twiggs described Robinson’s behavior after Charlie Kirk was killed and authenticated text exchanges in which Robinson allegedly admitted responsibility for the shooting, discussed the rifle and expressed concern that investigators would find his DNA on it. Twiggs also said Robinson later confirmed the confession in person and expressed regret about what he had done. Prosecutors additionally introduced Robinson’s handwritten note to Twiggs, which allegedly said that he had an opportunity to “take out Charlie Kirk” and took it, although Judge Tony Graf quickly ordered the image removed after it was inadvertently displayed publicly. Twiggs also identified Robinson in surveillance images with varying degrees of certainty, telling investigators that some of the later photographs definitely appeared to show him.


The state also spent a significant portion of the day strengthening the forensic connection between Robinson and the physical evidence. Investigators testified that Robinson’s DNA was found on numerous portions of the rifle recovered near Utah Valley University, including the stock, grips, trigger area, bolt and barrel, as well as on ammunition associated with the weapon. An ATF analysis also linked a rotary engraving tool recovered from Robinson’s residence to markings found on cartridge cases, supporting the prosecution’s allegation that ammunition had been engraved before the shooting. At the same time, the forensic evidence was not absolute across the board: investigators could not conclusively determine that the bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Kirk’s autopsy had been fired from the recovered rifle. By the end of the fourth day, however, prosecutors had combined Robinson’s alleged admissions, Twiggs’ account, the handwritten note, surveillance evidence and extensive DNA testimony into their clearest presentation yet of why they believe Robinson was the shooter.







to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>921breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/darren-indyke-and-his-epstein-related-congressional-transcript-part-4-10-9-26--75670383
The questioning also drilled into areas that have become increasingly important to understanding Epstein’s infrastructure. Indyke acknowledged familiarity with the Florida Science Foundation, explaining that the name was associated with the older COUQ Foundation and confirming that a separate Florida Science Foundation entity had been incorporated in November 2007, after Epstein’s arrest and while his federal plea negotiations were underway. He also acknowledged that Epstein wanted a scientific organization through which he could perform work release, although Indyke said he did not know why the separate entity had originally been created. Investigators questioned him about alleged sham marriages, immigration matters, Epstein’s trusts, his relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, his connections to Les and Abigail Wexner and the financial transactions he handled on Epstein’s behalf. Throughout the nearly seven-hour deposition, Indyke’s basic position remained remarkably consistent: he had been intimately involved with Epstein professionally, legally and financially, but claimed that he had not seen, participated in or understood the criminal conduct occurring around him. That tension between the breadth of Indyke’s responsibilities and the narrowness of what he claimed to know was ultimately the defining feature of his congressional testimony.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75670383Fri, 09 Oct 2026 20:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDarren Indyke’s March 19, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee offered one of the clearest looks yet at how Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime lawyer described his own role inside Epstein’s operation. Indyke, who represented Epstein for...
The questioning also drilled into areas that have become increasingly important to understanding Epstein’s infrastructure. Indyke acknowledged familiarity with the Florida Science Foundation, explaining that the name was associated with the older COUQ Foundation and confirming that a separate Florida Science Foundation entity had been incorporated in November 2007, after Epstein’s arrest and while his federal plea negotiations were underway. He also acknowledged that Epstein wanted a scientific organization through which he could perform work release, although Indyke said he did not know why the separate entity had originally been created. Investigators questioned him about alleged sham marriages, immigration matters, Epstein’s trusts, his relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, his connections to Les and Abigail Wexner and the financial transactions he handled on Epstein’s behalf. Throughout the nearly seven-hour deposition, Indyke’s basic position remained remarkably consistent: he had been intimately involved with Epstein professionally, legally and financially, but claimed that he had not seen, participated in or understood the criminal conduct occurring around him. That tension between the breadth of Indyke’s responsibilities and the narrowness of what he claimed to know was ultimately the defining feature of his congressional testimony.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>666epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/darren-indyke-and-his-epstein-related-congressional-transcript-part-3-10-9-26--75670384
The questioning also drilled into areas that have become increasingly important to understanding Epstein’s infrastructure. Indyke acknowledged familiarity with the Florida Science Foundation, explaining that the name was associated with the older COUQ Foundation and confirming that a separate Florida Science Foundation entity had been incorporated in November 2007, after Epstein’s arrest and while his federal plea negotiations were underway. He also acknowledged that Epstein wanted a scientific organization through which he could perform work release, although Indyke said he did not know why the separate entity had originally been created. Investigators questioned him about alleged sham marriages, immigration matters, Epstein’s trusts, his relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, his connections to Les and Abigail Wexner and the financial transactions he handled on Epstein’s behalf. Throughout the nearly seven-hour deposition, Indyke’s basic position remained remarkably consistent: he had been intimately involved with Epstein professionally, legally and financially, but claimed that he had not seen, participated in or understood the criminal conduct occurring around him. That tension between the breadth of Indyke’s responsibilities and the narrowness of what he claimed to know was ultimately the defining feature of his congressional testimony.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75670384Fri, 09 Oct 2026 18:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDarren Indyke’s March 19, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee offered one of the clearest looks yet at how Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime lawyer described his own role inside Epstein’s operation. Indyke, who represented Epstein for...
The questioning also drilled into areas that have become increasingly important to understanding Epstein’s infrastructure. Indyke acknowledged familiarity with the Florida Science Foundation, explaining that the name was associated with the older COUQ Foundation and confirming that a separate Florida Science Foundation entity had been incorporated in November 2007, after Epstein’s arrest and while his federal plea negotiations were underway. He also acknowledged that Epstein wanted a scientific organization through which he could perform work release, although Indyke said he did not know why the separate entity had originally been created. Investigators questioned him about alleged sham marriages, immigration matters, Epstein’s trusts, his relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, his connections to Les and Abigail Wexner and the financial transactions he handled on Epstein’s behalf. Throughout the nearly seven-hour deposition, Indyke’s basic position remained remarkably consistent: he had been intimately involved with Epstein professionally, legally and financially, but claimed that he had not seen, participated in or understood the criminal conduct occurring around him. That tension between the breadth of Indyke’s responsibilities and the narrowness of what he claimed to know was ultimately the defining feature of his congressional testimony.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>716epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/judge-rules-search-warrants-used-against-prince-andrew-were-unlawful-10-9-26--75670385
The ruling was a meaningful legal victory for Andrew, but it did not end the criminal investigation or amount to a finding that the underlying allegations were unfounded. Police said their investigation into possible misconduct in public office remains active, and the High Court specifically emphasized that invalidating the warrants did not invalidate the investigation itself. The next major fight concerns what happens to the material police seized under those unlawful warrants: authorities are seeking permission to retain at least some of it, with further proceedings expected to determine whether it can still be lawfully used. The investigation grew out of renewed scrutiny of Andrew’s dealings with Epstein while Andrew served as Britain’s trade envoy, including allegations stemming from released Epstein-related records that he shared sensitive or official information with Epstein. Andrew has denied wrongdoing and has not been charged.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Judge says search warrants used to seize property from former Prince Andrew were unlawful

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75670385Fri, 09 Oct 2026 16:20:16 +0000Bobby CapucciA London High Court judge ruled that the search warrants used by Thames Valley Police to raid the homes of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, formerly Prince Andrew, were unlawful because police sought them under the wrong section of the Police and Criminal...
The ruling was a meaningful legal victory for Andrew, but it did not end the criminal investigation or amount to a finding that the underlying allegations were unfounded. Police said their investigation into possible misconduct in public office remains active, and the High Court specifically emphasized that invalidating the warrants did not invalidate the investigation itself. The next major fight concerns what happens to the material police seized under those unlawful warrants: authorities are seeking permission to retain at least some of it, with further proceedings expected to determine whether it can still be lawfully used. The investigation grew out of renewed scrutiny of Andrew’s dealings with Epstein while Andrew served as Britain’s trade envoy, including allegations stemming from released Epstein-related records that he shared sensitive or official information with Epstein. Andrew has denied wrongdoing and has not been charged.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Judge says search warrants used to seize property from former Prince Andrew were unlawful

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>678epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-epstein-death-question-revisited-with-dr-michael-freeman-s-new-findings-10-9-26--75655400
Freeman also identified major problems with the original forensic investigation, including the absence of photographs showing Epstein’s body as it was found in the cell and the failure to preserve and properly examine the ligature itself. Those omissions made it impossible to fully reconstruct the mechanics of the hanging after the fact. Freeman’s analysis was not based simply on the well-known fractures in Epstein’s neck, but on the total injury pattern and the amount, direction and location of force that would have been required to produce it. His position was that the physical evidence pointed toward another person applying force to Epstein’s neck during a struggle, rather than Epstein creating the injuries through partial suspension from his bunk. Freeman was preparing to publicly present the biomechanical findings and release the underlying autopsy material so that the homicide-versus-suicide question could be evaluated on the forensic evidence itself.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

'Jeffrey Epstein's death was more likely a struggle, not suicide - this is the evidence' | News US | Metro News 

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75655400Fri, 09 Oct 2026 14:25:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDr. Michael Freeman, a professor of forensic medicine and editor-in-chief of the Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, concluded after reviewing Jeffrey Epstein’s full autopsy materials that the injuries documented on Epstein’s body were far more...
Freeman also identified major problems with the original forensic investigation, including the absence of photographs showing Epstein’s body as it was found in the cell and the failure to preserve and properly examine the ligature itself. Those omissions made it impossible to fully reconstruct the mechanics of the hanging after the fact. Freeman’s analysis was not based simply on the well-known fractures in Epstein’s neck, but on the total injury pattern and the amount, direction and location of force that would have been required to produce it. His position was that the physical evidence pointed toward another person applying force to Epstein’s neck during a struggle, rather than Epstein creating the injuries through partial suspension from his bunk. Freeman was preparing to publicly present the biomechanical findings and release the underlying autopsy material so that the homicide-versus-suicide question could be evaluated on the forensic evidence itself.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

'Jeffrey Epstein's death was more likely a struggle, not suicide - this is the evidence' | News US | Metro News 

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>643epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/prince-andrew-risks-major-legal-blowback-with-challenge-to-police-warrants-10-926--75655399
Former Metropolitan Police officer Graham Wettone said Andrew’s challenge appeared aimed at undermining the evidence gathered during those searches, because a ruling that the warrants were unlawful could potentially exclude seized material and disrupt the investigation. Wettone also stressed that the inquiry was complex, involved years of conduct, numerous witnesses and thousands of documents that investigators still had to review. The article also noted that Andrew remained largely isolated from the royal family, while King Charles had refused to pay the legal costs of the judicial review and had made clear that private financial support provided to Andrew should not be used for the case. Andrew has continued to deny wrongdoing, but the court challenge has created another major public and legal confrontation tied to his relationship with Epstein.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75655399Fri, 09 Oct 2026 12:25:02 +0000Bobby CapucciPrince Andrew’s decision to challenge Thames Valley Police over the legality of search warrants used during raids on his properties was described as an extraordinary and risky legal strategy. Andrew was arrested in February on suspicion of misconduct...
Former Metropolitan Police officer Graham Wettone said Andrew’s challenge appeared aimed at undermining the evidence gathered during those searches, because a ruling that the warrants were unlawful could potentially exclude seized material and disrupt the investigation. Wettone also stressed that the inquiry was complex, involved years of conduct, numerous witnesses and thousands of documents that investigators still had to review. The article also noted that Andrew remained largely isolated from the royal family, while King Charles had refused to pay the legal costs of the judicial review and had made clear that private financial support provided to Andrew should not be used for the case. Andrew has continued to deny wrongdoing, but the court challenge has created another major public and legal confrontation tied to his relationship with Epstein.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>652epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-many-theories-surrounding-the-motive-that-drove-the-murders-in-moscow-10-9-26--75646694
The “thrill kill” theory became one of the more heavily discussed possibilities because of the apparent planning, the use of a knife, the number of victims and the extreme risk involved in entering an occupied house in the middle of the night. Under that theory, the murders may have been driven less by hatred of a particular victim and more by a desire to experience the act of killing, fulfill a violent fantasy or prove an ability to commit what the offender believed was a sophisticated crime. Some experts also suggested the killer could have been drawn to the challenge of attacking multiple people and escaping undetected, which would fit a motive centered on control and gratification rather than a specific interpersonal conflict. None of those theories was conclusively established in court, however, and even after Bryan Kohberger’s guilty plea, the precise psychological motive remained one of the most important pieces of the case that was never fully explained.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75646694Fri, 09 Oct 2026 10:25:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe motive behind the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin became one of the biggest unanswered questions in the Moscow case, and investigators never publicly identified a single definitive reason for the attack....
The “thrill kill” theory became one of the more heavily discussed possibilities because of the apparent planning, the use of a knife, the number of victims and the extreme risk involved in entering an occupied house in the middle of the night. Under that theory, the murders may have been driven less by hatred of a particular victim and more by a desire to experience the act of killing, fulfill a violent fantasy or prove an ability to commit what the offender believed was a sophisticated crime. Some experts also suggested the killer could have been drawn to the challenge of attacking multiple people and escaping undetected, which would fit a motive centered on control and gratification rather than a specific interpersonal conflict. None of those theories was conclusively established in court, however, and even after Bryan Kohberger’s guilty plea, the precise psychological motive remained one of the most important pieces of the case that was never fully explained.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2365bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-security-around-the-house-on-king-road-in-the-wake-of-the-murders-10-9-26--75646253
The security issue became even more complicated because officials ultimately decided to demolish the house in December 2023 despite objections from some victims’ families, who argued that the property might still have evidentiary value if the case went to trial. Before demolition, prosecutors, defense attorneys and investigators were given additional access to inspect and document the residence, and the university said the structure had already been extensively photographed, scanned and mapped. Even so, the decision underscored the tension between preserving a notorious crime scene and the practical problems of maintaining an empty house that had become a public spectacle. For more than a year after the murders, King Road remained both evidence and a security liability, requiring officials to protect it from intrusion while deciding how long the physical scene itself still needed to exist.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75646253Fri, 09 Oct 2026 08:25:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn the aftermath of the November 2022 murders, the house at 1122 King Road became one of the most heavily scrutinized crime scenes in the country, but its physical security remained a recurring concern. Moscow police initially controlled access with...
The security issue became even more complicated because officials ultimately decided to demolish the house in December 2023 despite objections from some victims’ families, who argued that the property might still have evidentiary value if the case went to trial. Before demolition, prosecutors, defense attorneys and investigators were given additional access to inspect and document the residence, and the university said the structure had already been extensively photographed, scanned and mapped. Even so, the decision underscored the tension between preserving a notorious crime scene and the practical problems of maintaining an empty house that had become a public spectacle. For more than a year after the murders, King Road remained both evidence and a security liability, requiring officials to protect it from intrusion while deciding how long the physical scene itself still needed to exist.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2513bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-what-did-we-learn-from-the-various-forensic-reports-10-9-26--75646127
The toxicology reports added context about the victims’ condition before the murders but did not change the cause of death. All four had alcohol in their systems, with Madison recording the highest blood-alcohol concentration, followed by Xana, Ethan and Kaylee. Ethan and Xana also tested positive for amphetamines, though the reports did not identify those substances as contributing to their deaths. Taken together, the autopsy and toxicology findings gave investigators a clearer picture of the victims’ physical condition, the severity of the attack and the force used against them, while also undercutting early speculation that some other medical or toxicological factor may have played a role. The records instead reinforced that the four students died from a concentrated, exceptionally brutal knife attack carried out over a very short period of time.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75646127Fri, 09 Oct 2026 06:20:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe autopsy reports for Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin revealed just how violent and sustained the attacks inside 1122 King Road were. All four deaths were ruled homicides caused by multiple sharp-force injuries, and...
The toxicology reports added context about the victims’ condition before the murders but did not change the cause of death. All four had alcohol in their systems, with Madison recording the highest blood-alcohol concentration, followed by Xana, Ethan and Kaylee. Ethan and Xana also tested positive for amphetamines, though the reports did not identify those substances as contributing to their deaths. Taken together, the autopsy and toxicology findings gave investigators a clearer picture of the victims’ physical condition, the severity of the attack and the force used against them, while also undercutting early speculation that some other medical or toxicological factor may have played a role. The records instead reinforced that the four students died from a concentrated, exceptionally brutal knife attack carried out over a very short period of time.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2785bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-murder-scene-at-1122-king-road-and-the-latent-footprint-found-at-the-scene--75646146

In the affidavit, investigators stated that they found a latent footprint at the scene of the crime that was consistent with the type of print you would find on a pair of Vans shoes. The problem with that? Just about everyone has Vans.


In this episode, we take a look at the latent footprint as evidence and how it might be used by the prosecutors during the trial for Bryan Kohberger.

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Clue in Idaho Murder Case Leaves Question About Bryan Kohberger Evidence (newsweek.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75646146Fri, 09 Oct 2026 04:25:02 +0000Bobby CapucciForensically speaking, a latent footprint refers to an imprint left by a person's foot on a surface that is not immediately visible to the naked eye. These footprints are typically created when an individual transfers natural oils, dirt, or other...

In the affidavit, investigators stated that they found a latent footprint at the scene of the crime that was consistent with the type of print you would find on a pair of Vans shoes. The problem with that? Just about everyone has Vans.


In this episode, we take a look at the latent footprint as evidence and how it might be used by the prosecutors during the trial for Bryan Kohberger.

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Clue in Idaho Murder Case Leaves Question About Bryan Kohberger Evidence (newsweek.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>623bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-dna-cell-data-a-crumbling-defense--75646122
In preparation for the trial, which is scheduled to begin in August 2025, Kohberger has added San Francisco attorney Bicka Barlow to his defense team. Barlow, an expert in DNA forensics, has been admitted pro hac vice, allowing her to represent Kohberger in Idaho despite being licensed in California. Her expertise is expected to play a crucial role in challenging the DNA evidence presented by the prosecution. If convicted, Kohberger faces the possibility of the death penalty.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

Bombshell Bryan Kohberger court filing says relative refused to hand over DNA | Daily Mail Online

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75646122Fri, 09 Oct 2026 02:25:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn recent developments in the Bryan Kohberger case, Idaho Judge Steven Hippler has denied the defense's motion to exclude key DNA evidence. Kohberger, accused of murdering four University of Idaho students in 2022, argued that the use of Investigative...
In preparation for the trial, which is scheduled to begin in August 2025, Kohberger has added San Francisco attorney Bicka Barlow to his defense team. Barlow, an expert in DNA forensics, has been admitted pro hac vice, allowing her to represent Kohberger in Idaho despite being licensed in California. Her expertise is expected to play a crucial role in challenging the DNA evidence presented by the prosecution. If convicted, Kohberger faces the possibility of the death penalty.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

Bombshell Bryan Kohberger court filing says relative refused to hand over DNA | Daily Mail Online

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1044bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-cornell-7-jane-doe-and-her-allegations-against-chi-phi-and-cornell-university-part-3-10-8-26--75626819
The lawsuit goes beyond the individual students and argues that Cornell, Chi Phi, Tri Delta and other institutional defendants failed to protect Doe despite years of warnings about sexual assault, drugging and alcohol-related misconduct within Greek life. The complaint points to prior reports of sexual assaults and druggings connected to Cornell fraternities, campus reform efforts dating back years and policies that allegedly demonstrated the university and Greek organizations understood the risks. Doe accuses the institutional defendants of negligence, negligent supervision and retention, breach of contract and other failures, while asserting sexual assault, sexual battery and emotional-distress claims against the individual students. She also brings claims under New York’s Human Rights Law, education law and Dram Shop Act, alleging that Moonies unlawfully served her alcohol despite clear indications that she was underage and visibly intoxicated. The suit seeks compensatory and punitive damages, attorneys’ fees, interest and a jury trial, while making clear that the allegations remain civil claims that the defendants are entitled to contest in court.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

doe-cornell-new-york-supreme.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75626819Fri, 09 Oct 2026 00:25:02 +0000Bobby CapucciA Jane Doe plaintiff sued Cornell University, the Chi Phi fraternity and its national organizations, Tri Delta and its related entities, Moonies Bar & Nightclub, seven Cornell students and several other defendants over an alleged sexual assault at...
The lawsuit goes beyond the individual students and argues that Cornell, Chi Phi, Tri Delta and other institutional defendants failed to protect Doe despite years of warnings about sexual assault, drugging and alcohol-related misconduct within Greek life. The complaint points to prior reports of sexual assaults and druggings connected to Cornell fraternities, campus reform efforts dating back years and policies that allegedly demonstrated the university and Greek organizations understood the risks. Doe accuses the institutional defendants of negligence, negligent supervision and retention, breach of contract and other failures, while asserting sexual assault, sexual battery and emotional-distress claims against the individual students. She also brings claims under New York’s Human Rights Law, education law and Dram Shop Act, alleging that Moonies unlawfully served her alcohol despite clear indications that she was underage and visibly intoxicated. The suit seeks compensatory and punitive damages, attorneys’ fees, interest and a jury trial, while making clear that the allegations remain civil claims that the defendants are entitled to contest in court.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

doe-cornell-new-york-supreme.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>905campusnews,campussafety,chiphi,civilcase,collegenews,cornell,cornell7,cornellcase,cornelllawsuit,cornelluniversity,courtdocuments,fraternitynews,greeklife,highereducation,ithacany,janedoe,legalnews,newyorkcourts,titleix,truecrimetruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/leon-botstein-resigns-from-bard-as-epstein-scrutiny-intensifies-10-8-26--75646483

The controversy added to months of damaging revelations about Botstein’s ties to Epstein. An independent WilmerHale review commissioned by Bard previously found that Botstein had made about 25 visits to Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse, spent two days on Little St. James, and hosted Epstein twice at Bard, with some visits involving women later identified as Epstein victims. The review concluded that the frequency and nature of the interactions could have alerted Botstein to the possibility that he and Bard were helping facilitate Epstein’s abuse. Congressional investigators also said they had heard from more than a dozen whistleblowers alleging decades of unpunished sexual misconduct at Bard, further widening the inquiry beyond Botstein’s Epstein relationship alone. Botstein, who had led Bard for roughly 50 years and stepped down as president earlier in 2026, said he was resigning from his remaining roles to prevent the allegations from damaging the institution, while maintaining that the claims against him were false.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Leon Botstein resigns from Bard roles as key Democrat demands investigation into Epstein links | Jeffrey Epstein | The Guardian

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75646483Thu, 08 Oct 2026 22:25:02 +0000Bobby CapucciLeon Botstein resigned from all of his remaining positions at Bard College after House Judiciary Committee Democrats called for a criminal investigation into his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. The latest scrutiny centered on a 2014 email that...

The controversy added to months of damaging revelations about Botstein’s ties to Epstein. An independent WilmerHale review commissioned by Bard previously found that Botstein had made about 25 visits to Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse, spent two days on Little St. James, and hosted Epstein twice at Bard, with some visits involving women later identified as Epstein victims. The review concluded that the frequency and nature of the interactions could have alerted Botstein to the possibility that he and Bard were helping facilitate Epstein’s abuse. Congressional investigators also said they had heard from more than a dozen whistleblowers alleging decades of unpunished sexual misconduct at Bard, further widening the inquiry beyond Botstein’s Epstein relationship alone. Botstein, who had led Bard for roughly 50 years and stepped down as president earlier in 2026, said he was resigning from his remaining roles to prevent the allegations from damaging the institution, while maintaining that the claims against him were false.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Leon Botstein resigns from Bard roles as key Democrat demands investigation into Epstein links | Jeffrey Epstein | The Guardian

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1016epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/darren-indyke-and-his-epstein-related-congressional-transcript-part-2-10-7-26--75600242
The questioning also drilled into areas that have become increasingly important to understanding Epstein’s infrastructure. Indyke acknowledged familiarity with the Florida Science Foundation, explaining that the name was associated with the older COUQ Foundation and confirming that a separate Florida Science Foundation entity had been incorporated in November 2007, after Epstein’s arrest and while his federal plea negotiations were underway. He also acknowledged that Epstein wanted a scientific organization through which he could perform work release, although Indyke said he did not know why the separate entity had originally been created. Investigators questioned him about alleged sham marriages, immigration matters, Epstein’s trusts, his relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, his connections to Les and Abigail Wexner and the financial transactions he handled on Epstein’s behalf. Throughout the nearly seven-hour deposition, Indyke’s basic position remained remarkably consistent: he had been intimately involved with Epstein professionally, legally and financially, but claimed that he had not seen, participated in or understood the criminal conduct occurring around him. That tension between the breadth of Indyke’s responsibilities and the narrowness of what he claimed to know was ultimately the defining feature of his congressional testimony.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75600242Thu, 08 Oct 2026 20:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDarren Indyke’s March 19, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee offered one of the clearest looks yet at how Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime lawyer described his own role inside Epstein’s operation. Indyke, who represented Epstein for...
The questioning also drilled into areas that have become increasingly important to understanding Epstein’s infrastructure. Indyke acknowledged familiarity with the Florida Science Foundation, explaining that the name was associated with the older COUQ Foundation and confirming that a separate Florida Science Foundation entity had been incorporated in November 2007, after Epstein’s arrest and while his federal plea negotiations were underway. He also acknowledged that Epstein wanted a scientific organization through which he could perform work release, although Indyke said he did not know why the separate entity had originally been created. Investigators questioned him about alleged sham marriages, immigration matters, Epstein’s trusts, his relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, his connections to Les and Abigail Wexner and the financial transactions he handled on Epstein’s behalf. Throughout the nearly seven-hour deposition, Indyke’s basic position remained remarkably consistent: he had been intimately involved with Epstein professionally, legally and financially, but claimed that he had not seen, participated in or understood the criminal conduct occurring around him. That tension between the breadth of Indyke’s responsibilities and the narrowness of what he claimed to know was ultimately the defining feature of his congressional testimony.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>868epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/darren-indyke-and-his-epstein-related-congressional-transcript-part-1-10-7-26--75600393
The questioning also drilled into areas that have become increasingly important to understanding Epstein’s infrastructure. Indyke acknowledged familiarity with the Florida Science Foundation, explaining that the name was associated with the older COUQ Foundation and confirming that a separate Florida Science Foundation entity had been incorporated in November 2007, after Epstein’s arrest and while his federal plea negotiations were underway. He also acknowledged that Epstein wanted a scientific organization through which he could perform work release, although Indyke said he did not know why the separate entity had originally been created. Investigators questioned him about alleged sham marriages, immigration matters, Epstein’s trusts, his relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, his connections to Les and Abigail Wexner and the financial transactions he handled on Epstein’s behalf. Throughout the nearly seven-hour deposition, Indyke’s basic position remained remarkably consistent: he had been intimately involved with Epstein professionally, legally and financially, but claimed that he had not seen, participated in or understood the criminal conduct occurring around him. That tension between the breadth of Indyke’s responsibilities and the narrowness of what he claimed to know was ultimately the defining feature of his congressional testimony.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75600393Thu, 08 Oct 2026 18:30:05 +0000Bobby CapucciDarren Indyke’s March 19, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee offered one of the clearest looks yet at how Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime lawyer described his own role inside Epstein’s operation. Indyke, who represented Epstein for...
The questioning also drilled into areas that have become increasingly important to understanding Epstein’s infrastructure. Indyke acknowledged familiarity with the Florida Science Foundation, explaining that the name was associated with the older COUQ Foundation and confirming that a separate Florida Science Foundation entity had been incorporated in November 2007, after Epstein’s arrest and while his federal plea negotiations were underway. He also acknowledged that Epstein wanted a scientific organization through which he could perform work release, although Indyke said he did not know why the separate entity had originally been created. Investigators questioned him about alleged sham marriages, immigration matters, Epstein’s trusts, his relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, his connections to Les and Abigail Wexner and the financial transactions he handled on Epstein’s behalf. Throughout the nearly seven-hour deposition, Indyke’s basic position remained remarkably consistent: he had been intimately involved with Epstein professionally, legally and financially, but claimed that he had not seen, participated in or understood the criminal conduct occurring around him. That tension between the breadth of Indyke’s responsibilities and the narrowness of what he claimed to know was ultimately the defining feature of his congressional testimony.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>778epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/epstein-whistleblower-simon-andriesz-found-dead-in-thailand-10-8-26--75626818
Andriesz’s death, which the report said was ruled a suicide, has now prompted British lawmakers to call for greater scrutiny of both the circumstances surrounding his death and the way whistleblowers are treated by regulators. Supporters argued that Andriesz had repeatedly tried to expose wrongdoing involving wealthy and politically connected individuals but felt abandoned by the institutions that were supposed to protect him. His Epstein-related disclosures have taken on added significance because they contributed to renewed scrutiny of the relationships among Epstein, Lutnick and Prince Andrew, particularly where financial dealings and private communications appeared to contradict earlier public portrayals of those relationships. There is no public evidence establishing that Andriesz’s death was connected to his Epstein disclosures, but his death has intensified calls for an independent review of how his complaints were handled and whether whistleblowers raising allegations about powerful people are adequately protected.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75626818Thu, 08 Oct 2026 16:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBritish whistleblower Simon Andriesz, a 57-year-old former Wall Street banker, was found dead in Thailand months after publicly raising allegations about Jeffrey Epstein’s financial and business connections to powerful figures. According to The Sun,...
Andriesz’s death, which the report said was ruled a suicide, has now prompted British lawmakers to call for greater scrutiny of both the circumstances surrounding his death and the way whistleblowers are treated by regulators. Supporters argued that Andriesz had repeatedly tried to expose wrongdoing involving wealthy and politically connected individuals but felt abandoned by the institutions that were supposed to protect him. His Epstein-related disclosures have taken on added significance because they contributed to renewed scrutiny of the relationships among Epstein, Lutnick and Prince Andrew, particularly where financial dealings and private communications appeared to contradict earlier public portrayals of those relationships. There is no public evidence establishing that Andriesz’s death was connected to his Epstein disclosures, but his death has intensified calls for an independent review of how his complaints were handled and whether whistleblowers raising allegations about powerful people are adequately protected.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1073epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/virginia-robert-s-brother-says-congressman-jeff-crank-ignored-their-epstein-outreach-10-8-26--75626817
Crank did not sign earlier discharge petitions intended to force a House vote on releasing the Epstein files, although he ultimately voted for the Epstein Files Transparency Act in November 2025 after President Donald Trump urged Republicans to support it. Crank’s campaign rejected the criticism, accusing Democratic challenger Jessica Killin of exploiting a grieving family and emphasizing that Crank voted for the legislation when it reached the House floor. Sky Roberts pushed back, saying the family chose to speak publicly and that Crank still had not directly acknowledged what Virginia and other survivors endured. The dispute has now become part of the 2026 congressional campaign, with Killin arguing that Crank acted only after political pressure mounted and the Roberts family backing her because she was willing to meet with them and hear their concerns directly.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Rep. Jeff Crank refused to meet with constituents related to Epstein survivor, family says | Colorado Newsline

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75626817Thu, 08 Oct 2026 14:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciSky and Amanda Roberts, the brother and sister-in-law of Virginia Roberts Giuffre, publicly criticized Republican Rep. Jeff Crank of Colorado for repeatedly declining to meet with them about the Epstein files and reforms aimed at helping survivors of...
Crank did not sign earlier discharge petitions intended to force a House vote on releasing the Epstein files, although he ultimately voted for the Epstein Files Transparency Act in November 2025 after President Donald Trump urged Republicans to support it. Crank’s campaign rejected the criticism, accusing Democratic challenger Jessica Killin of exploiting a grieving family and emphasizing that Crank voted for the legislation when it reached the House floor. Sky Roberts pushed back, saying the family chose to speak publicly and that Crank still had not directly acknowledged what Virginia and other survivors endured. The dispute has now become part of the 2026 congressional campaign, with Killin arguing that Crank acted only after political pressure mounted and the Roberts family backing her because she was willing to meet with them and hear their concerns directly.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Rep. Jeff Crank refused to meet with constituents related to Epstein survivor, family says | Colorado Newsline

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>746epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/todd-blanche-produces-epstein-materials-after-judge-sullivan-s-order-10-8-26--75626816
DOJ also submitted unredacted handwritten notes underlying several typewritten FBI FD-302 interview reports, along with the unredacted typed versions, and told the court that the handwritten notes were duplicative of reports already available in the Epstein Library. In addition, the department provided 2021 email exchanges among attorneys in the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York describing efforts to collect the relevant records. The October 5 filing was essentially a formal notice telling the court that Blanche had finally produced the materials Judge Sullivan demanded, while also laying out DOJ’s justification for the challenged victim-related redactions and its position that the underlying handwritten FBI notes did not contain materially different information from the published typed reports.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.291779.54.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75626816Thu, 08 Oct 2026 12:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn a two-page filing in Phang v. Blanche, Attorney General Todd Blanche notified Judge Emmet Sullivan that the Justice Department had complied with the court’s order requiring it to provide certain Epstein-related materials for in camera review. DOJ...
DOJ also submitted unredacted handwritten notes underlying several typewritten FBI FD-302 interview reports, along with the unredacted typed versions, and told the court that the handwritten notes were duplicative of reports already available in the Epstein Library. In addition, the department provided 2021 email exchanges among attorneys in the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York describing efforts to collect the relevant records. The October 5 filing was essentially a formal notice telling the court that Blanche had finally produced the materials Judge Sullivan demanded, while also laying out DOJ’s justification for the challenged victim-related redactions and its position that the underlying handwritten FBI notes did not contain materially different information from the published typed reports.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.291779.54.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>965epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-investigation-into-bryan-kohberger-during-the-first-2-weeks-in-jan-2023-10-8-26--75624786
The affidavit also transformed the public understanding of what happened inside 1122 King Road. A surviving roommate told investigators she heard noises during the early morning hours, opened her bedroom door several times and eventually saw a masked man dressed in black walking through the house before she locked herself in her room. Investigators narrowed the killings to roughly 4:00 to 4:25 a.m., while records showed Xana Kernodle received a DoorDash delivery around 4 a.m. and was using TikTok shortly afterward, suggesting she may have been awake during the attack. Headlines in the days that followed focused heavily on whether Kohberger had surveilled the house beforehand, whether he returned to the area later that morning, what motive he might have had and whether he knew any of the victims. Despite the flood of new information, the affidavit left major questions unanswered, including motive, the location of the murder weapon and the full scope of the prosecution’s evidence, while Kohberger’s defense began preparing for what was already becoming one of the most closely watched murder cases in the country.



to ontact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75624786Thu, 08 Oct 2026 10:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe first two weeks of January 2023 were dominated by Bryan Kohberger’s arrest, extradition and the first major public disclosure of the evidence investigators said tied him to the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan...
The affidavit also transformed the public understanding of what happened inside 1122 King Road. A surviving roommate told investigators she heard noises during the early morning hours, opened her bedroom door several times and eventually saw a masked man dressed in black walking through the house before she locked herself in her room. Investigators narrowed the killings to roughly 4:00 to 4:25 a.m., while records showed Xana Kernodle received a DoorDash delivery around 4 a.m. and was using TikTok shortly afterward, suggesting she may have been awake during the attack. Headlines in the days that followed focused heavily on whether Kohberger had surveilled the house beforehand, whether he returned to the area later that morning, what motive he might have had and whether he knew any of the victims. Despite the flood of new information, the affidavit left major questions unanswered, including motive, the location of the murder weapon and the full scope of the prosecution’s evidence, while Kohberger’s defense began preparing for what was already becoming one of the most closely watched murder cases in the country.



to ontact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2878bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-vicky-white-and-her-brazen-plan-to-help-her-lover-escape-prison-10-8-26--75624785
Prosecutors accused Vicky White of facilitating Casey White’s escape, supplying the logistics needed to flee and using her position inside the jail to circumvent normal security procedures. Investigators also uncovered evidence that the two had developed a secret relationship before the escape, including phone contact while Casey White was incarcerated. Vicky White was charged with permitting or facilitating escape and later faced additional charges connected to the breakout. The manhunt ended in Evansville, Indiana, after police pursued the pair and their vehicle crashed; Vicky White suffered a gunshot wound that authorities said was self-inflicted and died shortly afterward, while Casey White was taken back into custody.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75624785Thu, 08 Oct 2026 08:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciVicky White was the assistant director of corrections at the Lauderdale County Jail in Alabama who became the subject of a nationwide manhunt in 2022 after disappearing with inmate Casey White, a capital murder suspect who was awaiting trial....
Prosecutors accused Vicky White of facilitating Casey White’s escape, supplying the logistics needed to flee and using her position inside the jail to circumvent normal security procedures. Investigators also uncovered evidence that the two had developed a secret relationship before the escape, including phone contact while Casey White was incarcerated. Vicky White was charged with permitting or facilitating escape and later faced additional charges connected to the breakout. The manhunt ended in Evansville, Indiana, after police pursued the pair and their vehicle crashed; Vicky White suffered a gunshot wound that authorities said was self-inflicted and died shortly afterward, while Casey White was taken back into custody.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3281coldcase,courtroomdrama,crimedocumentary,crimenews,crimepodcast,crimestories,crimeupdate,criminalinvestigation,justice,missingpersons,murdermystery,serialkiller,truecrime,truecrimeaddict,truecrimecommunity,truecrimedaily,truecrimediscussion,truecrimepodcast,truecrimestories,unsolvedmysteriestruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-2nd-spotify-att-t-and-instagram-warrants-in-moscow-10-8-26--75624784
The amended Instagram warrant reflected the same methodical effort to correct and refine the social-media portion of the investigation. Investigators had already served multiple warrants on Meta seeking records connected to Instagram and Facebook accounts belonging to the victims, surviving roommates and other relevant individuals, but at least one Instagram request had to be amended after an error in the way account identifiers were entered prevented Meta from returning the intended records. The corrected warrant allowed investigators to properly seek the account data they originally wanted, including communications, subscriber information and activity potentially relevant to relationships, contacts or events surrounding the murders. Taken together, the three warrants illustrated how the Moscow investigation moved beyond physical evidence and basic cellphone location data into a much broader digital reconstruction of the months before the killings, with detectives trying to determine who was communicating with whom, what accounts were being used, and whether there was evidence of prior contact, monitoring or planning before the attack.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75624784Thu, 08 Oct 2026 06:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe second Spotify warrant, second AT&T warrant and amended Instagram warrant showed investigators continuing to widen their digital search as they tried to reconstruct the movements, communications and online activity surrounding the murders of...
The amended Instagram warrant reflected the same methodical effort to correct and refine the social-media portion of the investigation. Investigators had already served multiple warrants on Meta seeking records connected to Instagram and Facebook accounts belonging to the victims, surviving roommates and other relevant individuals, but at least one Instagram request had to be amended after an error in the way account identifiers were entered prevented Meta from returning the intended records. The corrected warrant allowed investigators to properly seek the account data they originally wanted, including communications, subscriber information and activity potentially relevant to relationships, contacts or events surrounding the murders. Taken together, the three warrants illustrated how the Moscow investigation moved beyond physical evidence and basic cellphone location data into a much broader digital reconstruction of the months before the killings, with detectives trying to determine who was communicating with whom, what accounts were being used, and whether there was evidence of prior contact, monitoring or planning before the attack.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2770bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-bryan-kohberger-and-the-doordash-driver-who-claims-she-is-a-witness--75624696
However, the woman's credibility could be challenged due to her arrest for driving under the influence of prescription medication during the same incident. Despite this, her statement has garnered attention as a potentially significant piece of evidence in the case. Prosecutors may seek to introduce her testimony to establish a timeline of events leading up to the murders, while the defense may attempt to discredit her account. The trial is scheduled to begin in August 2025, with jury selection starting in late July. As the proceedings unfold, this new witness could play a pivotal role in the case against Kohberger.

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

Bryan Kohberger murder case: Potential witness appears to say she saw him at the scene, police video shows | CNN

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75624696Thu, 08 Oct 2026 04:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciA new development has emerged in the case against Bryan Kohberger, the suspect in the 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students. A woman, identified only as "MM" in court documents, claims she was the DoorDash driver who delivered food to...
However, the woman's credibility could be challenged due to her arrest for driving under the influence of prescription medication during the same incident. Despite this, her statement has garnered attention as a potentially significant piece of evidence in the case. Prosecutors may seek to introduce her testimony to establish a timeline of events leading up to the murders, while the defense may attempt to discredit her account. The trial is scheduled to begin in August 2025, with jury selection starting in late July. As the proceedings unfold, this new witness could play a pivotal role in the case against Kohberger.

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

Bryan Kohberger murder case: Potential witness appears to say she saw him at the scene, police video shows | CNN

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1069bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-a-content-creator-is-accused-of-manufacturing-evidence--75625038
The incident became one of the clearest early examples of how misinformation surrounding the Moscow murders could move from speculation into the outright manufacture of supposed evidence. At the time, investigators were already dealing with an enormous volume of online rumors, false accusations and unverified material while trying to identify the killer, and Moscow police repeatedly warned that misinformation was creating distractions and harming people who had no connection to the crime. The Morris controversy was particularly serious because it did not simply involve offering a theory about the case; he was accused of taking unrelated material and presenting it in a way that made it appear evidentiary. Other creators publicly exposed the recording as fake, and the episode became a cautionary example of how the enormous online audience surrounding the murders created incentives for sensational content even when the material being circulated had no legitimate connection to the investigation.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75625038Thu, 08 Oct 2026 02:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn the weeks after the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin in Moscow, Idaho, YouTube creator Joseph Morris was accused of manufacturing purported evidence and presenting it to viewers as though it came from the...
The incident became one of the clearest early examples of how misinformation surrounding the Moscow murders could move from speculation into the outright manufacture of supposed evidence. At the time, investigators were already dealing with an enormous volume of online rumors, false accusations and unverified material while trying to identify the killer, and Moscow police repeatedly warned that misinformation was creating distractions and harming people who had no connection to the crime. The Morris controversy was particularly serious because it did not simply involve offering a theory about the case; he was accused of taking unrelated material and presenting it in a way that made it appear evidentiary. Other creators publicly exposed the recording as fake, and the episode became a cautionary example of how the enormous online audience surrounding the murders created incentives for sensational content even when the material being circulated had no legitimate connection to the investigation.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>676bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/jane-doe-and-her-allegations-against-the-cornell-7-part-2-10-7-26--75623885
The lawsuit goes beyond the individual students and argues that Cornell, Chi Phi, Tri Delta and other institutional defendants failed to protect Doe despite years of warnings about sexual assault, drugging and alcohol-related misconduct within Greek life. The complaint points to prior reports of sexual assaults and druggings connected to Cornell fraternities, campus reform efforts dating back years and policies that allegedly demonstrated the university and Greek organizations understood the risks. Doe accuses the institutional defendants of negligence, negligent supervision and retention, breach of contract and other failures, while asserting sexual assault, sexual battery and emotional-distress claims against the individual students. She also brings claims under New York’s Human Rights Law, education law and Dram Shop Act, alleging that Moonies unlawfully served her alcohol despite clear indications that she was underage and visibly intoxicated. The suit seeks compensatory and punitive damages, attorneys’ fees, interest and a jury trial, while making clear that the allegations remain civil claims that the defendants are entitled to contest in court.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

doe-cornell-new-york-supreme.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75623885Thu, 08 Oct 2026 00:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciA Jane Doe plaintiff sued Cornell University, the Chi Phi fraternity and its national organizations, Tri Delta and its related entities, Moonies Bar & Nightclub, seven Cornell students and several other defendants over an alleged sexual assault at...
The lawsuit goes beyond the individual students and argues that Cornell, Chi Phi, Tri Delta and other institutional defendants failed to protect Doe despite years of warnings about sexual assault, drugging and alcohol-related misconduct within Greek life. The complaint points to prior reports of sexual assaults and druggings connected to Cornell fraternities, campus reform efforts dating back years and policies that allegedly demonstrated the university and Greek organizations understood the risks. Doe accuses the institutional defendants of negligence, negligent supervision and retention, breach of contract and other failures, while asserting sexual assault, sexual battery and emotional-distress claims against the individual students. She also brings claims under New York’s Human Rights Law, education law and Dram Shop Act, alleging that Moonies unlawfully served her alcohol despite clear indications that she was underage and visibly intoxicated. The suit seeks compensatory and punitive damages, attorneys’ fees, interest and a jury trial, while making clear that the allegations remain civil claims that the defendants are entitled to contest in court.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

doe-cornell-new-york-supreme.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>723campusnews,chiphi,civillawsuit,collegenews,cornell,cornellcase,cornelllawsuit,courtcase,courtdocuments,fraternitynews,greeklife,janedoe,legaldocuments,legalnews,make,more,neutral #cornelluniversity,newyorkcourts,them,titleixtruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/jane-doe-and-her-allegations-against-the-cornell-7-part-1-10-7-26--75623884
The lawsuit goes beyond the individual students and argues that Cornell, Chi Phi, Tri Delta and other institutional defendants failed to protect Doe despite years of warnings about sexual assault, drugging and alcohol-related misconduct within Greek life. The complaint points to prior reports of sexual assaults and druggings connected to Cornell fraternities, campus reform efforts dating back years and policies that allegedly demonstrated the university and Greek organizations understood the risks. Doe accuses the institutional defendants of negligence, negligent supervision and retention, breach of contract and other failures, while asserting sexual assault, sexual battery and emotional-distress claims against the individual students. She also brings claims under New York’s Human Rights Law, education law and Dram Shop Act, alleging that Moonies unlawfully served her alcohol despite clear indications that she was underage and visibly intoxicated. The suit seeks compensatory and punitive damages, attorneys’ fees, interest and a jury trial, while making clear that the allegations remain civil claims that the defendants are entitled to contest in court.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

doe-cornell-new-york-supreme.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75623884Wed, 07 Oct 2026 22:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciA Jane Doe plaintiff sued Cornell University, the Chi Phi fraternity and its national organizations, Tri Delta and its related entities, Moonies Bar & Nightclub, seven Cornell students and several other defendants over an alleged sexual assault at...
The lawsuit goes beyond the individual students and argues that Cornell, Chi Phi, Tri Delta and other institutional defendants failed to protect Doe despite years of warnings about sexual assault, drugging and alcohol-related misconduct within Greek life. The complaint points to prior reports of sexual assaults and druggings connected to Cornell fraternities, campus reform efforts dating back years and policies that allegedly demonstrated the university and Greek organizations understood the risks. Doe accuses the institutional defendants of negligence, negligent supervision and retention, breach of contract and other failures, while asserting sexual assault, sexual battery and emotional-distress claims against the individual students. She also brings claims under New York’s Human Rights Law, education law and Dram Shop Act, alleging that Moonies unlawfully served her alcohol despite clear indications that she was underage and visibly intoxicated. The suit seeks compensatory and punitive damages, attorneys’ fees, interest and a jury trial, while making clear that the allegations remain civil claims that the defendants are entitled to contest in court.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

doe-cornell-new-york-supreme.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1052campusnews,chiphi,civillawsuit,collegenews,cornell,cornellcase,cornelllawsuit,courtcase,courtdocuments,fraternitynews,greeklife,janedoe,legaldocuments,legalnews,make,more,neutral #cornelluniversity,newyorkcourts,them,titleixtruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcripts-day-3-part-7-10-7-26--75624003
A major portion of the shortened hearing was consumed by a fight over whether prosecutors could publicly play a recorded interview with Twiggs, Robinson’s roommate and romantic partner. Davis testified that Twiggs had been interviewed twice and had been granted limited use immunity for his statements. Prosecutors wanted to introduce the later recorded interview with relatively few restrictions, while Robinson’s attorneys argued that large portions should be redacted to protect his right to a fair trial and prevent potentially prejudicial material from being widely circulated before a jury was ever selected. The Kirk family’s attorney argued in favor of greater public access, while Judge Tony Graf said he had to balance transparency against Robinson’s constitutional rights. Graf ultimately directed prosecutors to return with an edited version of the video, leaving the dispute to carry over into the next day of the preliminary hearing.

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75624003Wed, 07 Oct 2026 20:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay three of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing focused largely on what happened after Robinson turned himself in following the killing of Charlie Kirk. Utah State Bureau of Investigation agent Brian Davis testified that he was sent to St. George...
A major portion of the shortened hearing was consumed by a fight over whether prosecutors could publicly play a recorded interview with Twiggs, Robinson’s roommate and romantic partner. Davis testified that Twiggs had been interviewed twice and had been granted limited use immunity for his statements. Prosecutors wanted to introduce the later recorded interview with relatively few restrictions, while Robinson’s attorneys argued that large portions should be redacted to protect his right to a fair trial and prevent potentially prejudicial material from being widely circulated before a jury was ever selected. The Kirk family’s attorney argued in favor of greater public access, while Judge Tony Graf said he had to balance transparency against Robinson’s constitutional rights. Graf ultimately directed prosecutors to return with an edited version of the video, leaving the dispute to carry over into the next day of the preliminary hearing.

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>828breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcripts-day-3-part-6-10-7-26--75624004
A major portion of the shortened hearing was consumed by a fight over whether prosecutors could publicly play a recorded interview with Twiggs, Robinson’s roommate and romantic partner. Davis testified that Twiggs had been interviewed twice and had been granted limited use immunity for his statements. Prosecutors wanted to introduce the later recorded interview with relatively few restrictions, while Robinson’s attorneys argued that large portions should be redacted to protect his right to a fair trial and prevent potentially prejudicial material from being widely circulated before a jury was ever selected. The Kirk family’s attorney argued in favor of greater public access, while Judge Tony Graf said he had to balance transparency against Robinson’s constitutional rights. Graf ultimately directed prosecutors to return with an edited version of the video, leaving the dispute to carry over into the next day of the preliminary hearing.

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75624004Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:30:04 +0000Bobby CapucciDay three of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing focused largely on what happened after Robinson turned himself in following the killing of Charlie Kirk. Utah State Bureau of Investigation agent Brian Davis testified that he was sent to St. George...
A major portion of the shortened hearing was consumed by a fight over whether prosecutors could publicly play a recorded interview with Twiggs, Robinson’s roommate and romantic partner. Davis testified that Twiggs had been interviewed twice and had been granted limited use immunity for his statements. Prosecutors wanted to introduce the later recorded interview with relatively few restrictions, while Robinson’s attorneys argued that large portions should be redacted to protect his right to a fair trial and prevent potentially prejudicial material from being widely circulated before a jury was ever selected. The Kirk family’s attorney argued in favor of greater public access, while Judge Tony Graf said he had to balance transparency against Robinson’s constitutional rights. Graf ultimately directed prosecutors to return with an edited version of the video, leaving the dispute to carry over into the next day of the preliminary hearing.

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1199breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/ghislaine-maxwell-s-2002-citizenship-and-the-federal-law-governing-denaturalization-part-3-10-7-26--75600245
The theory is strengthened by recent and historical denaturalization cases in which the Justice Department stripped or sought to strip citizenship from people whose serious pre-naturalization crimes were discovered or adjudicated years later. Courts have revoked citizenship where applicants concealed sexual abuse, child exploitation, fraud, and other serious misconduct that predated naturalization. Maxwell’s case would still require DOJ to prove materiality, willfulness, and legal ineligibility under the standards set by the Supreme Court, and denaturalization would not be automatic. But because she retained British and French citizenship, losing U.S. citizenship would not leave her stateless, and it could eventually expose her to removal proceedings after she completes her federal sentence. The core question is therefore not whether Maxwell deserves to lose citizenship, but whether she was legally entitled to receive it in the first place.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75600245Wed, 07 Oct 2026 16:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciGhislaine Maxwell’s American citizenship could potentially be challenged under federal denaturalization law, not simply because she was later convicted of serious crimes, but because some of the conduct underlying those convictions occurred before she...
The theory is strengthened by recent and historical denaturalization cases in which the Justice Department stripped or sought to strip citizenship from people whose serious pre-naturalization crimes were discovered or adjudicated years later. Courts have revoked citizenship where applicants concealed sexual abuse, child exploitation, fraud, and other serious misconduct that predated naturalization. Maxwell’s case would still require DOJ to prove materiality, willfulness, and legal ineligibility under the standards set by the Supreme Court, and denaturalization would not be automatic. But because she retained British and French citizenship, losing U.S. citizenship would not leave her stateless, and it could eventually expose her to removal proceedings after she completes her federal sentence. The core question is therefore not whether Maxwell deserves to lose citizenship, but whether she was legally entitled to receive it in the first place.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>940epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/ghislaine-maxwell-s-2002-citizenship-and-the-federal-law-governing-denaturalization-part-2-10-7-26--75600394
The theory is strengthened by recent and historical denaturalization cases in which the Justice Department stripped or sought to strip citizenship from people whose serious pre-naturalization crimes were discovered or adjudicated years later. Courts have revoked citizenship where applicants concealed sexual abuse, child exploitation, fraud, and other serious misconduct that predated naturalization. Maxwell’s case would still require DOJ to prove materiality, willfulness, and legal ineligibility under the standards set by the Supreme Court, and denaturalization would not be automatic. But because she retained British and French citizenship, losing U.S. citizenship would not leave her stateless, and it could eventually expose her to removal proceedings after she completes her federal sentence. The core question is therefore not whether Maxwell deserves to lose citizenship, but whether she was legally entitled to receive it in the first place.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75600394Wed, 07 Oct 2026 14:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciGhislaine Maxwell’s American citizenship could potentially be challenged under federal denaturalization law, not simply because she was later convicted of serious crimes, but because some of the conduct underlying those convictions occurred before she...
The theory is strengthened by recent and historical denaturalization cases in which the Justice Department stripped or sought to strip citizenship from people whose serious pre-naturalization crimes were discovered or adjudicated years later. Courts have revoked citizenship where applicants concealed sexual abuse, child exploitation, fraud, and other serious misconduct that predated naturalization. Maxwell’s case would still require DOJ to prove materiality, willfulness, and legal ineligibility under the standards set by the Supreme Court, and denaturalization would not be automatic. But because she retained British and French citizenship, losing U.S. citizenship would not leave her stateless, and it could eventually expose her to removal proceedings after she completes her federal sentence. The core question is therefore not whether Maxwell deserves to lose citizenship, but whether she was legally entitled to receive it in the first place.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>824epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/ghislaine-maxwell-s-2002-citizenship-and-the-federal-law-governing-denaturalization-part-1-10-7-26--75600241
The theory is strengthened by recent and historical denaturalization cases in which the Justice Department stripped or sought to strip citizenship from people whose serious pre-naturalization crimes were discovered or adjudicated years later. Courts have revoked citizenship where applicants concealed sexual abuse, child exploitation, fraud, and other serious misconduct that predated naturalization. Maxwell’s case would still require DOJ to prove materiality, willfulness, and legal ineligibility under the standards set by the Supreme Court, and denaturalization would not be automatic. But because she retained British and French citizenship, losing U.S. citizenship would not leave her stateless, and it could eventually expose her to removal proceedings after she completes her federal sentence. The core question is therefore not whether Maxwell deserves to lose citizenship, but whether she was legally entitled to receive it in the first place.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75600241Wed, 07 Oct 2026 12:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciGhislaine Maxwell’s American citizenship could potentially be challenged under federal denaturalization law, not simply because she was later convicted of serious crimes, but because some of the conduct underlying those convictions occurred before she...
The theory is strengthened by recent and historical denaturalization cases in which the Justice Department stripped or sought to strip citizenship from people whose serious pre-naturalization crimes were discovered or adjudicated years later. Courts have revoked citizenship where applicants concealed sexual abuse, child exploitation, fraud, and other serious misconduct that predated naturalization. Maxwell’s case would still require DOJ to prove materiality, willfulness, and legal ineligibility under the standards set by the Supreme Court, and denaturalization would not be automatic. But because she retained British and French citizenship, losing U.S. citizenship would not leave her stateless, and it could eventually expose her to removal proceedings after she completes her federal sentence. The core question is therefore not whether Maxwell deserves to lose citizenship, but whether she was legally entitled to receive it in the first place.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1119epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-ethan-chapin-s-family-and-the-trial-that-never-came-10-7-26--75597159
That approach distinguished the Chapins from some of the other victims’ families, who followed Kohberger’s court proceedings closely and attended important hearings. The Chapins deliberately refused to allow Kohberger to become the center of Ethan’s story, instead directing their attention toward projects honoring their son, including the Ethan’s Smile foundation, scholarships and Stacy’s children’s book, The Boy Who Wore Blue. Their position remained consistent even after Kohberger ultimately pleaded guilty in July 2025, eliminating the trial altogether: the family also stayed away from his sentencing hearing. For the Chapins, participation in the courtroom process was never presented as indifference to accountability; it was a conscious decision that their limited emotional resources were better spent remembering Ethan and supporting the family he left behind than sitting in a courtroom focusing on the man who murdered him.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75597159Wed, 07 Oct 2026 10:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciEthan Chapin’s family made it clear well before Bryan Kohberger’s case reached its conclusion that they had no intention of attending his trial. Ethan’s mother, Stacy Chapin, said in June 2023 that sitting through the proceedings would not be a...
That approach distinguished the Chapins from some of the other victims’ families, who followed Kohberger’s court proceedings closely and attended important hearings. The Chapins deliberately refused to allow Kohberger to become the center of Ethan’s story, instead directing their attention toward projects honoring their son, including the Ethan’s Smile foundation, scholarships and Stacy’s children’s book, The Boy Who Wore Blue. Their position remained consistent even after Kohberger ultimately pleaded guilty in July 2025, eliminating the trial altogether: the family also stayed away from his sentencing hearing. For the Chapins, participation in the courtroom process was never presented as indifference to accountability; it was a conscious decision that their limited emotional resources were better spent remembering Ethan and supporting the family he left behind than sitting in a courtroom focusing on the man who murdered him.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2471bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-the-state-of-idaho-trade-motion-after-motion-10-7-26--75597161
The back-and-forth became a defining feature of the case because almost every major piece of evidence and every significant procedural question generated another round of briefing. The state sought to restrict the defense from presenting certain theories without supporting evidence, fought requests for additional discovery it considered unnecessary and opposed attempts to suppress evidence tied to Kohberger’s vehicle, phone records, digital accounts and Pennsylvania arrest. The defense, meanwhile, repeatedly accused prosecutors of withholding information or failing to provide enough detail about how evidence had been obtained and analyzed. By the time the case neared trial, the docket had become a sprawling record of motions, responses, replies and judicial rulings covering everything from DNA and search warrants to expert witnesses, alibi evidence, courtroom cameras, jury selection and the death penalty. The sheer volume of litigation showed how both sides were trying to win critical battles before a jury ever heard the case, with each ruling potentially determining what the eventual trial would look like.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75597161Wed, 07 Oct 2026 08:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe prosecution and Bryan Kohberger’s defense spent much of the pretrial period locked in an aggressive and unusually broad motion war, with each side repeatedly asking the court to shape what evidence the jury would see, what arguments could be made...
The back-and-forth became a defining feature of the case because almost every major piece of evidence and every significant procedural question generated another round of briefing. The state sought to restrict the defense from presenting certain theories without supporting evidence, fought requests for additional discovery it considered unnecessary and opposed attempts to suppress evidence tied to Kohberger’s vehicle, phone records, digital accounts and Pennsylvania arrest. The defense, meanwhile, repeatedly accused prosecutors of withholding information or failing to provide enough detail about how evidence had been obtained and analyzed. By the time the case neared trial, the docket had become a sprawling record of motions, responses, replies and judicial rulings covering everything from DNA and search warrants to expert witnesses, alibi evidence, courtroom cameras, jury selection and the death penalty. The sheer volume of litigation showed how both sides were trying to win critical battles before a jury ever heard the case, with each ruling potentially determining what the eventual trial would look like.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2703bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-joran-van-der-sloot-confesses-to-murdering-natalie-holloway-10-6-26--75597160
The problem was that van der Sloot had spent nearly two decades telling radically different versions of the story, giving Aruban authorities plenty of reason to treat any new confession with extreme caution. In an earlier recorded account he claimed Natalee had suddenly become unresponsive and that a friend disposed of her body at sea; in another version he claimed her body had been placed in a swamp; and during his extortion scheme he supplied information about a burial location that he later admitted was worthless. Aruban prosecutors had investigated some of those supposed confessions and concluded that the details could not be reconciled with known evidence or witness accounts, with chief prosecutor Peter Blanken describing one version as being held together by “lies and fantasy.” After the 2023 confession became public, Aruba did not simply declare the case solved: prosecutors said the investigation remained open and requested the American case materials for independent review. That skepticism was understandable given van der Sloot’s extraordinary record of lying about Natalee’s fate—the central question for Aruban authorities was never whether he could tell a convincing story, but whether the latest story could actually be corroborated.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75597160Wed, 07 Oct 2026 06:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJoran van der Sloot finally admitted in October 2023 that he killed Natalee Holloway after she disappeared during a graduation trip to Aruba in May 2005. The confession came as part of his federal plea agreement in Alabama on charges that he had tried...
The problem was that van der Sloot had spent nearly two decades telling radically different versions of the story, giving Aruban authorities plenty of reason to treat any new confession with extreme caution. In an earlier recorded account he claimed Natalee had suddenly become unresponsive and that a friend disposed of her body at sea; in another version he claimed her body had been placed in a swamp; and during his extortion scheme he supplied information about a burial location that he later admitted was worthless. Aruban prosecutors had investigated some of those supposed confessions and concluded that the details could not be reconciled with known evidence or witness accounts, with chief prosecutor Peter Blanken describing one version as being held together by “lies and fantasy.” After the 2023 confession became public, Aruba did not simply declare the case solved: prosecutors said the investigation remained open and requested the American case materials for independent review. That skepticism was understandable given van der Sloot’s extraordinary record of lying about Natalee’s fate—the central question for Aruban authorities was never whether he could tell a convincing story, but whether the latest story could actually be corroborated.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2715coldcase,crime,crimestories,criminalpsychology,forensics,investigation,justice,missingpersons,murder,podcast,podcasts,serialkiller,truecrime,truecrimeaddict,truecrimecommunity,truecrimejunkie,truecrimepodcast,truecrimestories,unsolved,unsolvedmysteriestruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-where-was-kaylee-living-at-the-time-of-the-murders--75597212
That detail became especially significant after the murders because Goncalves was not simply returning home after an ordinary night out. She had already moved away from King Road and came back for what was supposed to be a brief visit. On the night of November 12, Goncalves and Mogen went to the Corner Club in downtown Moscow, stopped at the Grub Truck and were dropped back at 1122 King Road at approximately 1:56 a.m. Police later determined that Goncalves, Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin were killed between roughly 4:00 and 4:25 a.m. The fact that Goncalves had already moved out made the timing particularly tragic: she was only back at King Road for the weekend, visiting her closest friend and showing off the vehicle she had bought as she prepared to leave Idaho and begin her career in Texas.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonamil.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75597212Wed, 07 Oct 2026 04:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciKaylee Goncalves had largely moved out of the 1122 King Road house before she was murdered on November 13, 2022. According to her parents, Goncalves was preparing to graduate early from the University of Idaho and had already lined up a job with a...
That detail became especially significant after the murders because Goncalves was not simply returning home after an ordinary night out. She had already moved away from King Road and came back for what was supposed to be a brief visit. On the night of November 12, Goncalves and Mogen went to the Corner Club in downtown Moscow, stopped at the Grub Truck and were dropped back at 1122 King Road at approximately 1:56 a.m. Police later determined that Goncalves, Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin were killed between roughly 4:00 and 4:25 a.m. The fact that Goncalves had already moved out made the timing particularly tragic: she was only back at King Road for the weekend, visiting her closest friend and showing off the vehicle she had bought as she prepared to leave Idaho and begin her career in Texas.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonamil.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>786bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/a-few-final-thoughts-as-bryan-kohberger-fades-into-oblivion--75583427

And then there’s Kohberger himself—a hollow, attention-starved coward who slaughtered vibrant young lives to feel significant. He wasn’t a genius or an enigma—he was a bitter failure who targeted joy because he couldn’t stand its reflection. He thought murder would make him matter, but all it earned him was a concrete tomb and eternal contempt. He will live out his days in silence, stripped of control, stripped of myth, remembered only as a disgrace. Meanwhile, the victims live on—beloved, mourned, eternal.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75583427Wed, 07 Oct 2026 02:30:02 +0000Bobby Capucci Idaho Four murders didn’t just expose the evil of Bryan Kohberger—they revealed the sickness festering in the true crime community. From the moment news broke, self-proclaimed sleuths and content creators swarmed like vultures, exploiting the deaths...

And then there’s Kohberger himself—a hollow, attention-starved coward who slaughtered vibrant young lives to feel significant. He wasn’t a genius or an enigma—he was a bitter failure who targeted joy because he couldn’t stand its reflection. He thought murder would make him matter, but all it earned him was a concrete tomb and eternal contempt. He will live out his days in silence, stripped of control, stripped of myth, remembered only as a disgrace. Meanwhile, the victims live on—beloved, mourned, eternal.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>922bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcripts-day-3-part-5-10-6-26--75597359
A major portion of the shortened hearing was consumed by a fight over whether prosecutors could publicly play a recorded interview with Twiggs, Robinson’s roommate and romantic partner. Davis testified that Twiggs had been interviewed twice and had been granted limited use immunity for his statements. Prosecutors wanted to introduce the later recorded interview with relatively few restrictions, while Robinson’s attorneys argued that large portions should be redacted to protect his right to a fair trial and prevent potentially prejudicial material from being widely circulated before a jury was ever selected. The Kirk family’s attorney argued in favor of greater public access, while Judge Tony Graf said he had to balance transparency against Robinson’s constitutional rights. Graf ultimately directed prosecutors to return with an edited version of the video, leaving the dispute to carry over into the next day of the preliminary hearing.

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75597359Wed, 07 Oct 2026 00:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay three of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing focused largely on what happened after Robinson turned himself in following the killing of Charlie Kirk. Utah State Bureau of Investigation agent Brian Davis testified that he was sent to St. George...
A major portion of the shortened hearing was consumed by a fight over whether prosecutors could publicly play a recorded interview with Twiggs, Robinson’s roommate and romantic partner. Davis testified that Twiggs had been interviewed twice and had been granted limited use immunity for his statements. Prosecutors wanted to introduce the later recorded interview with relatively few restrictions, while Robinson’s attorneys argued that large portions should be redacted to protect his right to a fair trial and prevent potentially prejudicial material from being widely circulated before a jury was ever selected. The Kirk family’s attorney argued in favor of greater public access, while Judge Tony Graf said he had to balance transparency against Robinson’s constitutional rights. Graf ultimately directed prosecutors to return with an edited version of the video, leaving the dispute to carry over into the next day of the preliminary hearing.

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1376breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/leon-black-and-the-reply-memo-in-further-support-of-dismissing-jane-doe-s-claims-part-2-10-6-26-2--75585765
Additionally, the defense contends that certain claims are legally deficient, as they do not establish essential elements required for such causes of action. Black's attorneys emphasize that the complaint does not provide adequate grounds to proceed and request the court to dismiss the case in its entirety. The reply memorandum serves to reinforce these points, aiming to persuade the court to rule in favor of dismissal.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.602764.70.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75585765Tue, 06 Oct 2026 22:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn the case of Doe v. Black (Case No. 1:23-cv-06418-JGLC), Defendant Leon Black filed a reply memorandum supporting his motion to dismiss Plaintiff Jane Doe's complaint. Black's legal team argues that Doe's allegations are time-barred under the...
Additionally, the defense contends that certain claims are legally deficient, as they do not establish essential elements required for such causes of action. Black's attorneys emphasize that the complaint does not provide adequate grounds to proceed and request the court to dismiss the case in its entirety. The reply memorandum serves to reinforce these points, aiming to persuade the court to rule in favor of dismissal.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.602764.70.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>697epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/leon-black-and-the-reply-memo-in-further-support-of-dismissing-jane-doe-s-claims-part-1-10-6-26-2--75585763
Additionally, the defense contends that certain claims are legally deficient, as they do not establish essential elements required for such causes of action. Black's attorneys emphasize that the complaint does not provide adequate grounds to proceed and request the court to dismiss the case in its entirety. The reply memorandum serves to reinforce these points, aiming to persuade the court to rule in favor of dismissal.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.602764.70.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75585763Tue, 06 Oct 2026 20:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn the case of Doe v. Black (Case No. 1:23-cv-06418-JGLC), Defendant Leon Black filed a reply memorandum supporting his motion to dismiss Plaintiff Jane Doe's complaint. Black's legal team argues that Doe's allegations are time-barred under the...
Additionally, the defense contends that certain claims are legally deficient, as they do not establish essential elements required for such causes of action. Black's attorneys emphasize that the complaint does not provide adequate grounds to proceed and request the court to dismiss the case in its entirety. The reply memorandum serves to reinforce these points, aiming to persuade the court to rule in favor of dismissal.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.602764.70.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>617epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/prince-andrew-takes-police-to-court-over-epstein-files-arrest-10-6-26--75585766
Andrew’s legal team was specifically challenging the validity of the warrants rather than simply contesting the broader investigation, and a High Court judge had already granted permission for the judicial review to proceed. A private hearing was scheduled to determine whether documents connected to that challenge should be released. The investigation itself was also facing complications because, according to the report, the U.S. Justice Department had not provided British authorities with unredacted versions of relevant Epstein records, potentially leaving investigators dependent on a lengthy formal international request. Thames Valley Police had meanwhile widened its inquiry to include allegations of sexual misconduct and appealed for additional witnesses to come forward. The case therefore placed Andrew in the unusual position of simultaneously remaining the subject of an active Epstein-related police investigation while asking the courts to rule that some of the investigative measures used against him were unlawful.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Exclusive: Andrew takes police to court over Epstein files arrest

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75585766Tue, 06 Oct 2026 18:30:06 +0000Bobby CapucciAndrew Mountbatten-Windsor launched a legal challenge against Thames Valley Police over the search warrants used during his February 2026 arrest in connection with the Jeffrey Epstein files. The former Duke of York, who was arrested at Marsh Farm on...
Andrew’s legal team was specifically challenging the validity of the warrants rather than simply contesting the broader investigation, and a High Court judge had already granted permission for the judicial review to proceed. A private hearing was scheduled to determine whether documents connected to that challenge should be released. The investigation itself was also facing complications because, according to the report, the U.S. Justice Department had not provided British authorities with unredacted versions of relevant Epstein records, potentially leaving investigators dependent on a lengthy formal international request. Thames Valley Police had meanwhile widened its inquiry to include allegations of sexual misconduct and appealed for additional witnesses to come forward. The case therefore placed Andrew in the unusual position of simultaneously remaining the subject of an active Epstein-related police investigation while asking the courts to rule that some of the investigative measures used against him were unlawful.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Exclusive: Andrew takes police to court over Epstein files arrest

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1246epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/dr-michael-freeman-challenges-the-forensic-record-in-jeffrey-epstein-s-death-10-6-26--75585762
Mark Epstein said Freeman’s work reinforced his long-standing belief that his brother’s death deserved a deeper investigation and argued that a more detailed scientific review at the time could have produced a different conclusion. Freeman was expected to present his findings at University College London in November 2026 and later publish the research alongside the autopsy files. He stressed that Epstein’s death could only be explained as either suicide or homicide and said his presentation would weigh the evidence supporting both possibilities. The development added another layer to the years of questions surrounding Epstein’s death, particularly because of the documented failures at the jail and the continuing disputes over the forensic evidence.




to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75585762Tue, 06 Oct 2026 16:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciA forensic-medicine professor who reviewed Jeffrey Epstein’s autopsy records was preparing to present findings that could challenge the official conclusion that Epstein died by suicide in his Manhattan jail cell in August 2019. Michael Freeman,...
Mark Epstein said Freeman’s work reinforced his long-standing belief that his brother’s death deserved a deeper investigation and argued that a more detailed scientific review at the time could have produced a different conclusion. Freeman was expected to present his findings at University College London in November 2026 and later publish the research alongside the autopsy files. He stressed that Epstein’s death could only be explained as either suicide or homicide and said his presentation would weigh the evidence supporting both possibilities. The development added another layer to the years of questions surrounding Epstein’s death, particularly because of the documented failures at the jail and the continuing disputes over the forensic evidence.




to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>637epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-house-on-chew-avenue-raymond-horsch-and-the-missing-women-part-2-10-6-26--75585761
Authorities are now attempting to determine where Raymond Horsch’s long-established world of staged violence ended and possible real violence began. Raymond spent years photographing vulnerable women, including women struggling with addiction, while creating scenes involving bondage, strangulation, apparent death and body disposal, making forensic authentication of the recovered material critical. Investigators have searched the house, plumbing, sewer lines, containers, storage devices and concealed areas while collecting chemicals, suspicious materials and other evidence for laboratory testing. Approximately 95 search warrants had reportedly been obtained by late September, and authorities planned an invasive forensic examination of the property beginning October 5, including removing floors, opening walls and sampling locations shown in Raymond’s photographs and videos for blood, DNA and other trace evidence. Only a portion of the digital archive had been reviewed by mid-September, meaning investigators could still identify additional women or uncover evidence that changes the scope of the inquiry. Raymond died in May 2025 and can never be questioned about what investigators are finding, leaving detectives to reconstruct the story through digital files, metadata, witnesses and whatever physical evidence remains inside the house. For the families who spent years without answers, the investigation has transformed long-dormant disappearances into one interconnected mystery centered on a single Philadelphia property and the disturbing archive left behind by the man who lived there.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75585761Tue, 06 Oct 2026 14:30:03 +0000Bobby CapucciThe investigation surrounding 417 West Chew Avenue in Philadelphia began after Eugene Horsch was stopped in June 2026 with firearms, drugs, fraudulent federal credentials and a woman carrying identification in the name of missing woman Blair Tonzelli....
Authorities are now attempting to determine where Raymond Horsch’s long-established world of staged violence ended and possible real violence began. Raymond spent years photographing vulnerable women, including women struggling with addiction, while creating scenes involving bondage, strangulation, apparent death and body disposal, making forensic authentication of the recovered material critical. Investigators have searched the house, plumbing, sewer lines, containers, storage devices and concealed areas while collecting chemicals, suspicious materials and other evidence for laboratory testing. Approximately 95 search warrants had reportedly been obtained by late September, and authorities planned an invasive forensic examination of the property beginning October 5, including removing floors, opening walls and sampling locations shown in Raymond’s photographs and videos for blood, DNA and other trace evidence. Only a portion of the digital archive had been reviewed by mid-September, meaning investigators could still identify additional women or uncover evidence that changes the scope of the inquiry. Raymond died in May 2025 and can never be questioned about what investigators are finding, leaving detectives to reconstruct the story through digital files, metadata, witnesses and whatever physical evidence remains inside the house. For the families who spent years without answers, the investigation has transformed long-dormant disappearances into one interconnected mystery centered on a single Philadelphia property and the disturbing archive left behind by the man who lived there.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1232epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-house-on-chew-avenue-raymond-horsch-and-the-missing-women-part-1-10-6-26--75585764
Authorities are now attempting to determine where Raymond Horsch’s long-established world of staged violence ended and possible real violence began. Raymond spent years photographing vulnerable women, including women struggling with addiction, while creating scenes involving bondage, strangulation, apparent death and body disposal, making forensic authentication of the recovered material critical. Investigators have searched the house, plumbing, sewer lines, containers, storage devices and concealed areas while collecting chemicals, suspicious materials and other evidence for laboratory testing. Approximately 95 search warrants had reportedly been obtained by late September, and authorities planned an invasive forensic examination of the property beginning October 5, including removing floors, opening walls and sampling locations shown in Raymond’s photographs and videos for blood, DNA and other trace evidence. Only a portion of the digital archive had been reviewed by mid-September, meaning investigators could still identify additional women or uncover evidence that changes the scope of the inquiry. Raymond died in May 2025 and can never be questioned about what investigators are finding, leaving detectives to reconstruct the story through digital files, metadata, witnesses and whatever physical evidence remains inside the house. For the families who spent years without answers, the investigation has transformed long-dormant disappearances into one interconnected mystery centered on a single Philadelphia property and the disturbing archive left behind by the man who lived there.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75585764Tue, 06 Oct 2026 12:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe investigation surrounding 417 West Chew Avenue in Philadelphia began after Eugene Horsch was stopped in June 2026 with firearms, drugs, fraudulent federal credentials and a woman carrying identification in the name of missing woman Blair Tonzelli....
Authorities are now attempting to determine where Raymond Horsch’s long-established world of staged violence ended and possible real violence began. Raymond spent years photographing vulnerable women, including women struggling with addiction, while creating scenes involving bondage, strangulation, apparent death and body disposal, making forensic authentication of the recovered material critical. Investigators have searched the house, plumbing, sewer lines, containers, storage devices and concealed areas while collecting chemicals, suspicious materials and other evidence for laboratory testing. Approximately 95 search warrants had reportedly been obtained by late September, and authorities planned an invasive forensic examination of the property beginning October 5, including removing floors, opening walls and sampling locations shown in Raymond’s photographs and videos for blood, DNA and other trace evidence. Only a portion of the digital archive had been reviewed by mid-September, meaning investigators could still identify additional women or uncover evidence that changes the scope of the inquiry. Raymond died in May 2025 and can never be questioned about what investigators are finding, leaving detectives to reconstruct the story through digital files, metadata, witnesses and whatever physical evidence remains inside the house. For the families who spent years without answers, the investigation has transformed long-dormant disappearances into one interconnected mystery centered on a single Philadelphia property and the disturbing archive left behind by the man who lived there.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>697epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-madison-mogen-and-the-dna-under-her-finger-nails-10-6-26--75583499
Kohberger’s defense subsequently sent the left-hand DNA data for additional analysis using TrueAllele, probabilistic genotyping software designed to separate complicated mixtures. According to defense expert-disclosure materials filed with the court, that additional testing conclusively excluded Kohberger as a contributor, while the male contributor remained unidentified. That finding fueled a pretrial fight over how prosecutors would be allowed to characterize the original Idaho State Police result, because the defense argued that telling jurors the result involving Kohberger was merely “inconclusive” could wrongly suggest that his DNA might have been beneath Mogen’s fingernails when the later analysis excluded him. The evidence did not by itself establish that the unidentified male DNA belonged to the killer; DNA can be transferred through ordinary contact and investigators would still need to establish its source, timing and significance. But from an evidentiary standpoint, the striking fact was that investigators recovered an unidentified male DNA contribution from Mogen’s left fingernails while subsequent defense testing reported that contribution was not Bryan Kohberger.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75583499Tue, 06 Oct 2026 10:30:03 +0000Bobby CapucciDNA recovered from Madison “Maddie” Mogen’s fingernails became a significant issue in the Bryan Kohberger case because testing of the clippings from her left hand produced a mixture containing DNA from at least three people. Mogen was the major...
Kohberger’s defense subsequently sent the left-hand DNA data for additional analysis using TrueAllele, probabilistic genotyping software designed to separate complicated mixtures. According to defense expert-disclosure materials filed with the court, that additional testing conclusively excluded Kohberger as a contributor, while the male contributor remained unidentified. That finding fueled a pretrial fight over how prosecutors would be allowed to characterize the original Idaho State Police result, because the defense argued that telling jurors the result involving Kohberger was merely “inconclusive” could wrongly suggest that his DNA might have been beneath Mogen’s fingernails when the later analysis excluded him. The evidence did not by itself establish that the unidentified male DNA belonged to the killer; DNA can be transferred through ordinary contact and investigators would still need to establish its source, timing and significance. But from an evidentiary standpoint, the striking fact was that investigators recovered an unidentified male DNA contribution from Mogen’s left fingernails while subsequent defense testing reported that contribution was not Bryan Kohberger.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2652epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-state-of-idaho-once-again-responds-to-the-kohberger-autism-motions-10-6-26--75583500
The State also argued that Kohberger’s demeanor while sitting at counsel table was not evidence in the first place, particularly if he chose not to testify, so expert testimony explaining that demeanor would invite jurors to focus on something they legally were not supposed to consider. Judge Steven Hippler largely agreed with that reasoning, finding that allowing experts to explain Kohberger’s flat affect, intense eye contact, awkward posture or limited emotional responses could confuse the issues, encourage jurors to scrutinize his behavior even more closely and potentially generate sympathy unrelated to the actual evidence. The judge noted that he had observed Kohberger through numerous lengthy hearings and had not seen the kind of extraordinary or alarming courtroom behavior that required expert explanation. The court therefore ruled that autism evidence offered merely to explain Kohberger’s courtroom demeanor was inadmissible if he did not testify, while leaving open the possibility that some neuropsychological evidence could become relevant if the State opened the door to it or if Kohberger testified and his demeanor became relevant to his credibility.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75583500Tue, 06 Oct 2026 08:30:03 +0000Bobby CapucciThe State argued that Bryan Kohberger should not have been allowed to use his autism diagnosis as a broad explanation for his behavior during the guilt phase because Idaho law sharply limited the use of mental-condition evidence. Prosecutors relied on...
The State also argued that Kohberger’s demeanor while sitting at counsel table was not evidence in the first place, particularly if he chose not to testify, so expert testimony explaining that demeanor would invite jurors to focus on something they legally were not supposed to consider. Judge Steven Hippler largely agreed with that reasoning, finding that allowing experts to explain Kohberger’s flat affect, intense eye contact, awkward posture or limited emotional responses could confuse the issues, encourage jurors to scrutinize his behavior even more closely and potentially generate sympathy unrelated to the actual evidence. The judge noted that he had observed Kohberger through numerous lengthy hearings and had not seen the kind of extraordinary or alarming courtroom behavior that required expert explanation. The court therefore ruled that autism evidence offered merely to explain Kohberger’s courtroom demeanor was inadmissible if he did not testify, while leaving open the possibility that some neuropsychological evidence could become relevant if the State opened the door to it or if Kohberger testified and his demeanor became relevant to his credibility.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2400epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-murder-of-suzanne-morphew-10-5-26--75583570
The case changed dramatically in September 2023, when Suzanne’s remains were discovered in a shallow grave near Moffat, Colorado, more than 40 miles from her home. An autopsy subsequently classified her death as a homicide, and investigators found chemicals associated with the wildlife tranquilizer mixture known as BAM in her remains; Barry had experience using tranquilizers while raising deer, and investigators had previously recovered tranquilizer equipment during searches connected to the case. In June 2025, a Colorado grand jury indicted Barry Morphew again for first-degree murder, putting the case back on track for trial. He has continued to maintain his innocence and dispute the prosecution’s theory. As of October 2026, Barry is again in custody after his bond was increased to $10 million following an August 2026 incident, and his murder trial is currently expected in the summer of 2027. Suzanne’s disappearance therefore evolved from one of Colorado’s most closely watched missing-person cases into a homicide prosecution that, more than six years later, is still moving toward a final courtroom reckoning.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75583570Tue, 06 Oct 2026 06:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciSuzanne Morphew was a 49-year-old mother of two from Colorado who disappeared from her home near Salida on May 10, 2020, Mother’s Day. She had originally been from Indiana and was married to Barry Morphew, but investigators later uncovered evidence...
The case changed dramatically in September 2023, when Suzanne’s remains were discovered in a shallow grave near Moffat, Colorado, more than 40 miles from her home. An autopsy subsequently classified her death as a homicide, and investigators found chemicals associated with the wildlife tranquilizer mixture known as BAM in her remains; Barry had experience using tranquilizers while raising deer, and investigators had previously recovered tranquilizer equipment during searches connected to the case. In June 2025, a Colorado grand jury indicted Barry Morphew again for first-degree murder, putting the case back on track for trial. He has continued to maintain his innocence and dispute the prosecution’s theory. As of October 2026, Barry is again in custody after his bond was increased to $10 million following an August 2026 incident, and his murder trial is currently expected in the summer of 2027. Suzanne’s disappearance therefore evolved from one of Colorado’s most closely watched missing-person cases into a homicide prosecution that, more than six years later, is still moving toward a final courtroom reckoning.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2978breakingnewsdaily,crime,murder,murderino,mystery,newsreports,podcast,podcastersofinstagram,serialkiller,serialkillers,ssdgm,truecrime,truecrimeaddict,truecrimecommunity,truecrimefan,truecrimejunkie,truecrimeobsessed,truecrimepodcast,unsolved,unsolvedmysteriestruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-the-detached-reality-inhabited-by-the-pro-bryan-kohberger-crowd--75583488
What’s most baffling is the persistence of the "he’s still innocent" narrative, even as Kohberger’s own legal team has moved toward sentencing. For these online truthers, the guilty plea isn't a conclusion—it’s just another chapter in a fantasy where they get to play internet detective and cast doubt on grieving families and surviving victims. Many of them had built parasocial attachments to Kohberger, painting him as an intellectual, an underdog, even a victim of the justice system. Now that he’s confirmed what the evidence already screamed, their response isn’t to reflect or admit they were wrong—it’s to double down on delusion.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75583488Tue, 06 Oct 2026 04:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDespite Bryan Kohberger’s guilty plea to the brutal murders of four University of Idaho students, a loud corner of the internet remains in absolute denial. These die-hard defenders—many of whom spent over a year spinning elaborate conspiracies—have...
What’s most baffling is the persistence of the "he’s still innocent" narrative, even as Kohberger’s own legal team has moved toward sentencing. For these online truthers, the guilty plea isn't a conclusion—it’s just another chapter in a fantasy where they get to play internet detective and cast doubt on grieving families and surviving victims. Many of them had built parasocial attachments to Kohberger, painting him as an intellectual, an underdog, even a victim of the justice system. Now that he’s confirmed what the evidence already screamed, their response isn’t to reflect or admit they were wrong—it’s to double down on delusion.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>743bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-bryan-kohberger-and-the-fantasist-theory--75583426
Johnston also focused on cellphone evidence that investigators said placed Kohberger’s phone in the general area of the King Road house at approximately 9 a.m. on November 13, hours after Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin were killed. She theorized that if Kohberger did return to the area, it may have been less about retrieving the forgotten sheath and more about seeing whether the victims had been discovered and watching the aftermath of the killings begin to unfold. Johnston described that possibility as another extension of the fantasy, suggesting he may have wanted to relive the experience or observe the reaction to what had happened. She further speculated that Kohberger might have anonymously followed or participated in online discussions about the murders afterward, although claims linking him to accounts such as “Pappa Rodgers” or “InsideLooking” had not been established. Overall, Johnston portrayed the alleged behavior as that of someone intensely preoccupied with the experience of committing the crime and its aftermath, but whose fixation may have contributed to a series of mistakes that ultimately helped investigators identify him.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75583426Tue, 06 Oct 2026 02:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciForensic psychologist Dr. Joni Johnston argued that Bryan Kohberger appeared less like a criminal mastermind and more like an obsessive fantasist who became consumed with the idea of committing murder while overlooking basic steps that could have...
Johnston also focused on cellphone evidence that investigators said placed Kohberger’s phone in the general area of the King Road house at approximately 9 a.m. on November 13, hours after Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin were killed. She theorized that if Kohberger did return to the area, it may have been less about retrieving the forgotten sheath and more about seeing whether the victims had been discovered and watching the aftermath of the killings begin to unfold. Johnston described that possibility as another extension of the fantasy, suggesting he may have wanted to relive the experience or observe the reaction to what had happened. She further speculated that Kohberger might have anonymously followed or participated in online discussions about the murders afterward, although claims linking him to accounts such as “Pappa Rodgers” or “InsideLooking” had not been established. Overall, Johnston portrayed the alleged behavior as that of someone intensely preoccupied with the experience of committing the crime and its aftermath, but whose fixation may have contributed to a series of mistakes that ultimately helped investigators identify him.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>975bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcripts-day-3-part-4-10-5-26--75580355
A major portion of the shortened hearing was consumed by a fight over whether prosecutors could publicly play a recorded interview with Twiggs, Robinson’s roommate and romantic partner. Davis testified that Twiggs had been interviewed twice and had been granted limited use immunity for his statements. Prosecutors wanted to introduce the later recorded interview with relatively few restrictions, while Robinson’s attorneys argued that large portions should be redacted to protect his right to a fair trial and prevent potentially prejudicial material from being widely circulated before a jury was ever selected. The Kirk family’s attorney argued in favor of greater public access, while Judge Tony Graf said he had to balance transparency against Robinson’s constitutional rights. Graf ultimately directed prosecutors to return with an edited version of the video, leaving the dispute to carry over into the next day of the preliminary hearing.

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75580355Tue, 06 Oct 2026 00:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay three of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing focused largely on what happened after Robinson turned himself in following the killing of Charlie Kirk. Utah State Bureau of Investigation agent Brian Davis testified that he was sent to St. George...
A major portion of the shortened hearing was consumed by a fight over whether prosecutors could publicly play a recorded interview with Twiggs, Robinson’s roommate and romantic partner. Davis testified that Twiggs had been interviewed twice and had been granted limited use immunity for his statements. Prosecutors wanted to introduce the later recorded interview with relatively few restrictions, while Robinson’s attorneys argued that large portions should be redacted to protect his right to a fair trial and prevent potentially prejudicial material from being widely circulated before a jury was ever selected. The Kirk family’s attorney argued in favor of greater public access, while Judge Tony Graf said he had to balance transparency against Robinson’s constitutional rights. Graf ultimately directed prosecutors to return with an edited version of the video, leaving the dispute to carry over into the next day of the preliminary hearing.

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>691breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/doj-moves-to-end-katie-phang-s-epstein-files-lawsuit-part-4-10-5-26--75567711
The DOJ also attacks Phang’s claims on the merits. It argues that courts may compel only agency actions that are specifically and unequivocally required by law, and says the EFTA does not require the precise actions Phang is demanding. The Department defends its redactions, saying the statute expressly permits withholding victim-identifying information and that the Privacy Act independently requires protection of certain personal information. It rejects Phang’s position that the newer Epstein statute displaced those privacy protections, arguing the two laws must be read together. The government also says the EFTA contains no specific requirement that DOJ translate, review and produce foreign-language documents, and maintains that doing so would require immense resources and falls outside any clear statutory command. Taken together, the filing is a broad attempt to knock out the case at the threshold: no private right of action, no standing, no enforceable APA claim, no unlawful redactions, no mandatory obligation to produce foreign-language material, and no viable ultra vires or Declaratory Judgment Act claim. DOJ is asking Sullivan to enter judgment for Blanche and effectively terminate Phang’s lawsuit on the pleadings.



to contact me:

bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75567711Mon, 05 Oct 2026 22:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThis is Document 52-1 in Phang v. Blanche, filed October 1, 2026, and it is the DOJ’s Memorandum in Support of its Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. In plain terms, Todd Blanche and the Justice Department are asking Judge Emmet Sullivan to end...
The DOJ also attacks Phang’s claims on the merits. It argues that courts may compel only agency actions that are specifically and unequivocally required by law, and says the EFTA does not require the precise actions Phang is demanding. The Department defends its redactions, saying the statute expressly permits withholding victim-identifying information and that the Privacy Act independently requires protection of certain personal information. It rejects Phang’s position that the newer Epstein statute displaced those privacy protections, arguing the two laws must be read together. The government also says the EFTA contains no specific requirement that DOJ translate, review and produce foreign-language documents, and maintains that doing so would require immense resources and falls outside any clear statutory command. Taken together, the filing is a broad attempt to knock out the case at the threshold: no private right of action, no standing, no enforceable APA claim, no unlawful redactions, no mandatory obligation to produce foreign-language material, and no viable ultra vires or Declaratory Judgment Act claim. DOJ is asking Sullivan to enter judgment for Blanche and effectively terminate Phang’s lawsuit on the pleadings.



to contact me:

bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>844epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/doj-moves-to-end-katie-phang-s-epstein-files-lawsuit-part-3-10-5-26--75567712
The DOJ also attacks Phang’s claims on the merits. It argues that courts may compel only agency actions that are specifically and unequivocally required by law, and says the EFTA does not require the precise actions Phang is demanding. The Department defends its redactions, saying the statute expressly permits withholding victim-identifying information and that the Privacy Act independently requires protection of certain personal information. It rejects Phang’s position that the newer Epstein statute displaced those privacy protections, arguing the two laws must be read together. The government also says the EFTA contains no specific requirement that DOJ translate, review and produce foreign-language documents, and maintains that doing so would require immense resources and falls outside any clear statutory command. Taken together, the filing is a broad attempt to knock out the case at the threshold: no private right of action, no standing, no enforceable APA claim, no unlawful redactions, no mandatory obligation to produce foreign-language material, and no viable ultra vires or Declaratory Judgment Act claim. DOJ is asking Sullivan to enter judgment for Blanche and effectively terminate Phang’s lawsuit on the pleadings.



to contact me:

bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75567712Mon, 05 Oct 2026 20:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThis is Document 52-1 in Phang v. Blanche, filed October 1, 2026, and it is the DOJ’s Memorandum in Support of its Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. In plain terms, Todd Blanche and the Justice Department are asking Judge Emmet Sullivan to end...
The DOJ also attacks Phang’s claims on the merits. It argues that courts may compel only agency actions that are specifically and unequivocally required by law, and says the EFTA does not require the precise actions Phang is demanding. The Department defends its redactions, saying the statute expressly permits withholding victim-identifying information and that the Privacy Act independently requires protection of certain personal information. It rejects Phang’s position that the newer Epstein statute displaced those privacy protections, arguing the two laws must be read together. The government also says the EFTA contains no specific requirement that DOJ translate, review and produce foreign-language documents, and maintains that doing so would require immense resources and falls outside any clear statutory command. Taken together, the filing is a broad attempt to knock out the case at the threshold: no private right of action, no standing, no enforceable APA claim, no unlawful redactions, no mandatory obligation to produce foreign-language material, and no viable ultra vires or Declaratory Judgment Act claim. DOJ is asking Sullivan to enter judgment for Blanche and effectively terminate Phang’s lawsuit on the pleadings.



to contact me:

bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>776epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/doj-moves-to-end-katie-phang-s-epstein-files-lawsuit-part-2-10-5-26--75567710
The DOJ also attacks Phang’s claims on the merits. It argues that courts may compel only agency actions that are specifically and unequivocally required by law, and says the EFTA does not require the precise actions Phang is demanding. The Department defends its redactions, saying the statute expressly permits withholding victim-identifying information and that the Privacy Act independently requires protection of certain personal information. It rejects Phang’s position that the newer Epstein statute displaced those privacy protections, arguing the two laws must be read together. The government also says the EFTA contains no specific requirement that DOJ translate, review and produce foreign-language documents, and maintains that doing so would require immense resources and falls outside any clear statutory command. Taken together, the filing is a broad attempt to knock out the case at the threshold: no private right of action, no standing, no enforceable APA claim, no unlawful redactions, no mandatory obligation to produce foreign-language material, and no viable ultra vires or Declaratory Judgment Act claim. DOJ is asking Sullivan to enter judgment for Blanche and effectively terminate Phang’s lawsuit on the pleadings.



to contact me:

bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75567710Mon, 05 Oct 2026 18:30:04 +0000Bobby CapucciThis is Document 52-1 in Phang v. Blanche, filed October 1, 2026, and it is the DOJ’s Memorandum in Support of its Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. In plain terms, Todd Blanche and the Justice Department are asking Judge Emmet Sullivan to end...
The DOJ also attacks Phang’s claims on the merits. It argues that courts may compel only agency actions that are specifically and unequivocally required by law, and says the EFTA does not require the precise actions Phang is demanding. The Department defends its redactions, saying the statute expressly permits withholding victim-identifying information and that the Privacy Act independently requires protection of certain personal information. It rejects Phang’s position that the newer Epstein statute displaced those privacy protections, arguing the two laws must be read together. The government also says the EFTA contains no specific requirement that DOJ translate, review and produce foreign-language documents, and maintains that doing so would require immense resources and falls outside any clear statutory command. Taken together, the filing is a broad attempt to knock out the case at the threshold: no private right of action, no standing, no enforceable APA claim, no unlawful redactions, no mandatory obligation to produce foreign-language material, and no viable ultra vires or Declaratory Judgment Act claim. DOJ is asking Sullivan to enter judgment for Blanche and effectively terminate Phang’s lawsuit on the pleadings.



to contact me:

bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>896epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/doj-moves-to-end-katie-phang-s-epstein-files-lawsuit-part-1-10-5-26--75567714
The DOJ also attacks Phang’s claims on the merits. It argues that courts may compel only agency actions that are specifically and unequivocally required by law, and says the EFTA does not require the precise actions Phang is demanding. The Department defends its redactions, saying the statute expressly permits withholding victim-identifying information and that the Privacy Act independently requires protection of certain personal information. It rejects Phang’s position that the newer Epstein statute displaced those privacy protections, arguing the two laws must be read together. The government also says the EFTA contains no specific requirement that DOJ translate, review and produce foreign-language documents, and maintains that doing so would require immense resources and falls outside any clear statutory command. Taken together, the filing is a broad attempt to knock out the case at the threshold: no private right of action, no standing, no enforceable APA claim, no unlawful redactions, no mandatory obligation to produce foreign-language material, and no viable ultra vires or Declaratory Judgment Act claim. DOJ is asking Sullivan to enter judgment for Blanche and effectively terminate Phang’s lawsuit on the pleadings.



to contact me:

bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75567714Mon, 05 Oct 2026 16:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThis is Document 52-1 in Phang v. Blanche, filed October 1, 2026, and it is the DOJ’s Memorandum in Support of its Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. In plain terms, Todd Blanche and the Justice Department are asking Judge Emmet Sullivan to end...
The DOJ also attacks Phang’s claims on the merits. It argues that courts may compel only agency actions that are specifically and unequivocally required by law, and says the EFTA does not require the precise actions Phang is demanding. The Department defends its redactions, saying the statute expressly permits withholding victim-identifying information and that the Privacy Act independently requires protection of certain personal information. It rejects Phang’s position that the newer Epstein statute displaced those privacy protections, arguing the two laws must be read together. The government also says the EFTA contains no specific requirement that DOJ translate, review and produce foreign-language documents, and maintains that doing so would require immense resources and falls outside any clear statutory command. Taken together, the filing is a broad attempt to knock out the case at the threshold: no private right of action, no standing, no enforceable APA claim, no unlawful redactions, no mandatory obligation to produce foreign-language material, and no viable ultra vires or Declaratory Judgment Act claim. DOJ is asking Sullivan to enter judgment for Blanche and effectively terminate Phang’s lawsuit on the pleadings.



to contact me:

bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>660epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/doug-band-s-maxwell-emails-clash-with-his-congressional-testimony-10-5-26--75567715
The correspondence also included flirtatious and sexually suggestive language between Maxwell and the account associated with Band, despite his denial that their relationship was romantic. In one exchange, the sender described Maxwell as both a “pimp” and a “lover,” while other messages discussed spending private time together and used pet names. Legal experts interviewed by The Alligator cautioned that inconsistencies between emails and congressional testimony would not by themselves establish perjury or another crime; prosecutors would have to prove that Band knowingly made a materially false statement. The University of Florida has so far declined to take action or launch an investigation, despite calls from some students for an independent review. The Alligator also emphasized that it had found no evidence establishing criminal wrongdoing by Band or showing that he knew about Epstein and Maxwell’s abuse at the time.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Newly discovered documents illuminate Doug Band’s relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell - The Independent Florida Alligator

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75567715Mon, 05 Oct 2026 14:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciNewly uncovered emails are raising fresh questions about Doug Band’s congressional testimony concerning the extent of his relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell. Band, a longtime aide to former President Bill Clinton and a member of the University of...
The correspondence also included flirtatious and sexually suggestive language between Maxwell and the account associated with Band, despite his denial that their relationship was romantic. In one exchange, the sender described Maxwell as both a “pimp” and a “lover,” while other messages discussed spending private time together and used pet names. Legal experts interviewed by The Alligator cautioned that inconsistencies between emails and congressional testimony would not by themselves establish perjury or another crime; prosecutors would have to prove that Band knowingly made a materially false statement. The University of Florida has so far declined to take action or launch an investigation, despite calls from some students for an independent review. The Alligator also emphasized that it had found no evidence establishing criminal wrongdoing by Band or showing that he knew about Epstein and Maxwell’s abuse at the time.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Newly discovered documents illuminate Doug Band’s relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell - The Independent Florida Alligator

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>978epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/missing-fbi-302-raises-new-questions-about-epstein-s-wall-street-ties-10-5-26--75567713

Wyden argued that the missing interview could strengthen the case that major banks ignored warning signs surrounding Epstein’s financial activity and should face greater scrutiny for their role in facilitating his operations. His demand followed a Senate Finance Committee report that examined JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank and Bank of America and alleged failures to properly identify and report suspicious Epstein-related transactions. According to Wyden’s letter, Epstein withdrew millions of dollars in cash without an apparent business purpose and participated in thousands of suspicious wire transfers worth at least $1.4 billion. Wyden said the existence of the undisclosed banker interview also raises the possibility that the FBI is holding additional Epstein-related interview reports that have never been released.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

Trump DOJ accused of using bonkers Epstein scheme to protect Wall Street banker: report - Raw Story

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75567713Mon, 05 Oct 2026 12:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciSen. Ron Wyden accused the Justice Department and FBI of withholding an FBI interview report involving an unidentified banker connected to Jeffrey Epstein in order to protect major Wall Street institutions. Wyden said investigators for the Senate...

Wyden argued that the missing interview could strengthen the case that major banks ignored warning signs surrounding Epstein’s financial activity and should face greater scrutiny for their role in facilitating his operations. His demand followed a Senate Finance Committee report that examined JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank and Bank of America and alleged failures to properly identify and report suspicious Epstein-related transactions. According to Wyden’s letter, Epstein withdrew millions of dollars in cash without an apparent business purpose and participated in thousands of suspicious wire transfers worth at least $1.4 billion. Wyden said the existence of the undisclosed banker interview also raises the possibility that the FBI is holding additional Epstein-related interview reports that have never been released.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

Trump DOJ accused of using bonkers Epstein scheme to protect Wall Street banker: report - Raw Story

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>798epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-murder-of-rachel-morin-10-5-26--75566366
Morin’s case became one of the most closely followed murder investigations in Maryland after investigators spent months trying to identify the man responsible. In June 2024, authorities arrested Victor Martinez-Hernandez after a nationwide manhunt, saying DNA and other evidence tied him to Morin’s killing. Prosecutors later alleged that Morin had been abducted from the trail, sexually assaulted and murdered, and Martinez-Hernandez was ultimately brought to trial on charges including murder, rape and kidnapping. Beyond the criminal case, Morin became the face of a devastated family and community, with her mother, children and relatives becoming prominent advocates for accountability and justice in the years after her death.

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protnmail.com





Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75566366Mon, 05 Oct 2026 10:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciRachel Morin was a 37-year-old Maryland mother of five who lived in the Bel Air area of Harford County. On August 5, 2023, she went to the Ma and Pa Heritage Trail for what had been a routine walk or workout and never returned home. Her disappearance...
Morin’s case became one of the most closely followed murder investigations in Maryland after investigators spent months trying to identify the man responsible. In June 2024, authorities arrested Victor Martinez-Hernandez after a nationwide manhunt, saying DNA and other evidence tied him to Morin’s killing. Prosecutors later alleged that Morin had been abducted from the trail, sexually assaulted and murdered, and Martinez-Hernandez was ultimately brought to trial on charges including murder, rape and kidnapping. Beyond the criminal case, Morin became the face of a devastated family and community, with her mother, children and relatives becoming prominent advocates for accountability and justice in the years after her death.

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protnmail.com





Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2691epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-kouri-richin-s-and-the-moscow-mule-murder-10-5-26--75566365
In March 2026, a jury convicted Richins on every charge she faced after roughly three weeks of testimony and only about three hours of deliberations. She was found guilty of aggravated murder for Eric’s death, attempted aggravated murder for the earlier poisoning attempt, two counts of insurance fraud and one count of forgery. Jurors specifically found that the murder was committed for financial gain and through the administration of a lethal substance. In May 2026, Richins was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole, and a judge later rejected her request for a new trial.

to contat me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75566365Mon, 05 Oct 2026 08:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciKouri Richins is a Utah mother of three and former real-estate agent who became nationally known after the March 2022 death of her husband, Eric Richins. Prosecutors alleged that she secretly gave Eric a lethal dose of fentanyl in a Moscow Mule at...
In March 2026, a jury convicted Richins on every charge she faced after roughly three weeks of testimony and only about three hours of deliberations. She was found guilty of aggravated murder for Eric’s death, attempted aggravated murder for the earlier poisoning attempt, two counts of insurance fraud and one count of forgery. Jurors specifically found that the murder was committed for financial gain and through the administration of a lethal substance. In May 2026, Richins was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole, and a judge later rejected her request for a new trial.

to contat me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3002epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-legacy-media-and-their-epstein-blind-spot-10-4-26--75566381

That blind spot had consequences for accountability. Epstein died barely a month after his arrest, eliminating the possibility of a criminal trial that could have forced evidence into the open, generated sworn testimony and subjected his network to sustained judicial scrutiny. By the time much of the media began seriously digging into the larger machinery surrounding him, witnesses had aged or died, memories had faded, records had disappeared or become harder to obtain, and statutes of limitation complicated potential prosecutions. Survivors were left fighting through civil courts, document battles and piecemeal investigations to establish facts that could have received far more scrutiny years earlier. The failure to treat Epstein as an ongoing institutional story rather than a sensational crime story made the later search for truth and accountability slower, more fragmented and considerably harder.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75566381Mon, 05 Oct 2026 06:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciWhen Jeffrey Epstein was arrested in July 2019, much of the national media treated the story as a sudden scandal rather than the continuation of a case that had already been documented for years. There were important exceptions, most notably...

That blind spot had consequences for accountability. Epstein died barely a month after his arrest, eliminating the possibility of a criminal trial that could have forced evidence into the open, generated sworn testimony and subjected his network to sustained judicial scrutiny. By the time much of the media began seriously digging into the larger machinery surrounding him, witnesses had aged or died, memories had faded, records had disappeared or become harder to obtain, and statutes of limitation complicated potential prosecutions. Survivors were left fighting through civil courts, document battles and piecemeal investigations to establish facts that could have received far more scrutiny years earlier. The failure to treat Epstein as an ongoing institutional story rather than a sensational crime story made the later search for truth and accountability slower, more fragmented and considerably harder.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3223epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-goncalves-family-and-their-comments-on-the-reinstatement-of-the-firing-squad-in-idaho--75566711

The family’s position became even more pointed after Kohberger accepted a plea deal in July 2025 that removed the death penalty entirely. Kristi Goncalves later said she was disappointed that Kohberger would never face the firing squad, while the family criticized the death penalty system as effectively meaningless if prosecutors could use it as leverage only to bargain it away. Their support for the firing squad was therefore never abstract policy discussion. They viewed it through the lens of what happened to Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, and they believed that a defendant convicted of those murders should have faced the ultimate punishment. Kohberger’s plea agreement ensured that would never happen, leaving the Goncalves family openly frustrated that Idaho was strengthening its ability to carry out death sentences at virtually the same moment prosecutors took that possibility off the table in his case.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75566711Mon, 05 Oct 2026 04:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe Goncalves family, particularly Kaylee Goncalves’ father Steve, was outspoken in supporting Idaho’s return to the firing squad as an execution method while Bryan Kohberger’s case was still headed toward trial. Steve said he was not merely following...

The family’s position became even more pointed after Kohberger accepted a plea deal in July 2025 that removed the death penalty entirely. Kristi Goncalves later said she was disappointed that Kohberger would never face the firing squad, while the family criticized the death penalty system as effectively meaningless if prosecutors could use it as leverage only to bargain it away. Their support for the firing squad was therefore never abstract policy discussion. They viewed it through the lens of what happened to Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, and they believed that a defendant convicted of those murders should have faced the ultimate punishment. Kohberger’s plea agreement ensured that would never happen, leaving the Goncalves family openly frustrated that Idaho was strengthening its ability to carry out death sentences at virtually the same moment prosecutors took that possibility off the table in his case.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>669bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/bryan-kohberger-and-the-initial-forensic-tests-at-his-apartment-in-washington--75566710
The more important finding came from the subsequent DNA analysis: none of the blood recovered from Kohberger’s apartment was linked to Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle or Ethan Chapin. Later defense expert materials disclosed that all four presumptive-positive blood samples were consistent with Kohberger’s own known DNA profile. Investigators also examined hairs recovered through vacuum filtration and compared them with samples from the victims and the surviving dog, but those comparisons were negative as well. In other words, the initial testing produced several potentially interesting stains, but the follow-up forensic work did not establish that victim blood or hair had been carried back to Kohberger’s Washington apartment after the murders.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75566710Mon, 05 Oct 2026 02:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe initial forensic testing conducted at Bryan Kohberger’s apartment in Pullman, Washington, produced a limited number of presumptive positive results for blood. Investigators from the Idaho State Police Forensic Services Laboratory examined 51...
The more important finding came from the subsequent DNA analysis: none of the blood recovered from Kohberger’s apartment was linked to Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle or Ethan Chapin. Later defense expert materials disclosed that all four presumptive-positive blood samples were consistent with Kohberger’s own known DNA profile. Investigators also examined hairs recovered through vacuum filtration and compared them with samples from the victims and the surviving dog, but those comparisons were negative as well. In other words, the initial testing produced several potentially interesting stains, but the follow-up forensic work did not establish that victim blood or hair had been carried back to Kohberger’s Washington apartment after the murders.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>710bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcripts-day-3-part-3-10-4-26--75553556
A major portion of the shortened hearing was consumed by a fight over whether prosecutors could publicly play a recorded interview with Twiggs, Robinson’s roommate and romantic partner. Davis testified that Twiggs had been interviewed twice and had been granted limited use immunity for his statements. Prosecutors wanted to introduce the later recorded interview with relatively few restrictions, while Robinson’s attorneys argued that large portions should be redacted to protect his right to a fair trial and prevent potentially prejudicial material from being widely circulated before a jury was ever selected. The Kirk family’s attorney argued in favor of greater public access, while Judge Tony Graf said he had to balance transparency against Robinson’s constitutional rights. Graf ultimately directed prosecutors to return with an edited version of the video, leaving the dispute to carry over into the next day of the preliminary hearing.

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75553556Mon, 05 Oct 2026 00:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay three of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing focused largely on what happened after Robinson turned himself in following the killing of Charlie Kirk. Utah State Bureau of Investigation agent Brian Davis testified that he was sent to St. George...
A major portion of the shortened hearing was consumed by a fight over whether prosecutors could publicly play a recorded interview with Twiggs, Robinson’s roommate and romantic partner. Davis testified that Twiggs had been interviewed twice and had been granted limited use immunity for his statements. Prosecutors wanted to introduce the later recorded interview with relatively few restrictions, while Robinson’s attorneys argued that large portions should be redacted to protect his right to a fair trial and prevent potentially prejudicial material from being widely circulated before a jury was ever selected. The Kirk family’s attorney argued in favor of greater public access, while Judge Tony Graf said he had to balance transparency against Robinson’s constitutional rights. Graf ultimately directed prosecutors to return with an edited version of the video, leaving the dispute to carry over into the next day of the preliminary hearing.

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>726breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/utah-man-files-defamation-lawsuit-over-candace-owens-kirk-theories-10-4-26--75553555
The case is the latest legal challenge stemming from Owens’ theories about Kirk’s assassination. Charlie Kirk’s former security chief, Brian Harpole, previously filed his own defamation suit accusing Owens of falsely portraying him as part of a conspiracy surrounding the killing. Meanwhile, Utah prosecutors have charged Tyler Robinson with Kirk’s murder and have presented evidence including surveillance footage, DNA evidence and alleged admissions that they say tie Robinson to the shooting. Hild’s lawsuit does not ask the court to resolve the broader debate over Kirk’s death; it focuses on whether Owens made false factual claims about a private individual and whether those statements caused him measurable harm. The litigation now puts some of Owens’ most specific allegations about people she has linked to the assassination under direct judicial scrutiny.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Utah man sues Candace Owens, alleges theories over Charlie Kirk assassination falsely implicated him

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75553555Sun, 04 Oct 2026 22:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciA Utah man who attended Charlie Kirk’s September 2025 event at Utah Valley University has sued Candace Owens for defamation, alleging that she falsely connected him to Kirk’s assassination. Robert L. Hild Jr. said he was simply one of thousands of...
The case is the latest legal challenge stemming from Owens’ theories about Kirk’s assassination. Charlie Kirk’s former security chief, Brian Harpole, previously filed his own defamation suit accusing Owens of falsely portraying him as part of a conspiracy surrounding the killing. Meanwhile, Utah prosecutors have charged Tyler Robinson with Kirk’s murder and have presented evidence including surveillance footage, DNA evidence and alleged admissions that they say tie Robinson to the shooting. Hild’s lawsuit does not ask the court to resolve the broader debate over Kirk’s death; it focuses on whether Owens made false factual claims about a private individual and whether those statements caused him measurable harm. The litigation now puts some of Owens’ most specific allegations about people she has linked to the assassination under direct judicial scrutiny.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Utah man sues Candace Owens, alleges theories over Charlie Kirk assassination falsely implicated him

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1131breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/ghislaine-maxwell-motion-for-37-b-and-c-sanctions-during-the-virginia-roberts-lawsuit-part-3-10-4-26--75359686
Maxwell therefore asked the court to impose substantial discovery sanctions. Her primary request was to strike Giuffre’s claims for damages involving psychological pain, emotional distress, physical and psychiatric injuries, medical expenses, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity and invasion of privacy; alternatively, Maxwell sought an order preventing Giuffre from presenting evidence supporting those categories of damages. Maxwell also requested reimbursement of attorney’s fees and expenses incurred because of the alleged discovery failures and asked the judge to warn Giuffre that continued noncompliance could ultimately result in dismissal of the lawsuit. The motion was aggressive in both language and remedy, essentially arguing that Giuffre should not be permitted to seek significant physical and emotional damages while, in Maxwell’s view, withholding the very medical evidence Maxwell needed to challenge those claims. Those were Maxwell’s allegations and arguments in the sanctions motion, not findings by the court that Giuffre had actually engaged in deception or violated the discovery rules.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75359686Sun, 04 Oct 2026 20:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciGhislaine Maxwell’s motion for sanctions under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 37(b) and 37(c) accused Virginia Giuffre of repeatedly failing to comply with discovery requirements in the defamation lawsuit between them. Maxwell argued that an April...
Maxwell therefore asked the court to impose substantial discovery sanctions. Her primary request was to strike Giuffre’s claims for damages involving psychological pain, emotional distress, physical and psychiatric injuries, medical expenses, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity and invasion of privacy; alternatively, Maxwell sought an order preventing Giuffre from presenting evidence supporting those categories of damages. Maxwell also requested reimbursement of attorney’s fees and expenses incurred because of the alleged discovery failures and asked the judge to warn Giuffre that continued noncompliance could ultimately result in dismissal of the lawsuit. The motion was aggressive in both language and remedy, essentially arguing that Giuffre should not be permitted to seek significant physical and emotional damages while, in Maxwell’s view, withholding the very medical evidence Maxwell needed to challenge those claims. Those were Maxwell’s allegations and arguments in the sanctions motion, not findings by the court that Giuffre had actually engaged in deception or violated the discovery rules.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>996epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/ghislaine-maxwell-motion-for-37-b-and-c-sanctions-during-the-virginia-roberts-lawsuit-part-2-10-4-26--75359687
Maxwell therefore asked the court to impose substantial discovery sanctions. Her primary request was to strike Giuffre’s claims for damages involving psychological pain, emotional distress, physical and psychiatric injuries, medical expenses, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity and invasion of privacy; alternatively, Maxwell sought an order preventing Giuffre from presenting evidence supporting those categories of damages. Maxwell also requested reimbursement of attorney’s fees and expenses incurred because of the alleged discovery failures and asked the judge to warn Giuffre that continued noncompliance could ultimately result in dismissal of the lawsuit. The motion was aggressive in both language and remedy, essentially arguing that Giuffre should not be permitted to seek significant physical and emotional damages while, in Maxwell’s view, withholding the very medical evidence Maxwell needed to challenge those claims. Those were Maxwell’s allegations and arguments in the sanctions motion, not findings by the court that Giuffre had actually engaged in deception or violated the discovery rules.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75359687Sun, 04 Oct 2026 18:30:04 +0000Bobby CapucciGhislaine Maxwell’s motion for sanctions under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 37(b) and 37(c) accused Virginia Giuffre of repeatedly failing to comply with discovery requirements in the defamation lawsuit between them. Maxwell argued that an April...
Maxwell therefore asked the court to impose substantial discovery sanctions. Her primary request was to strike Giuffre’s claims for damages involving psychological pain, emotional distress, physical and psychiatric injuries, medical expenses, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity and invasion of privacy; alternatively, Maxwell sought an order preventing Giuffre from presenting evidence supporting those categories of damages. Maxwell also requested reimbursement of attorney’s fees and expenses incurred because of the alleged discovery failures and asked the judge to warn Giuffre that continued noncompliance could ultimately result in dismissal of the lawsuit. The motion was aggressive in both language and remedy, essentially arguing that Giuffre should not be permitted to seek significant physical and emotional damages while, in Maxwell’s view, withholding the very medical evidence Maxwell needed to challenge those claims. Those were Maxwell’s allegations and arguments in the sanctions motion, not findings by the court that Giuffre had actually engaged in deception or violated the discovery rules.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>761epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/ghislaine-maxwell-motion-for-37-b-and-c-sanctions-during-the-virginia-roberts-lawsuit-part-1-10-4-26--75359688
Maxwell therefore asked the court to impose substantial discovery sanctions. Her primary request was to strike Giuffre’s claims for damages involving psychological pain, emotional distress, physical and psychiatric injuries, medical expenses, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity and invasion of privacy; alternatively, Maxwell sought an order preventing Giuffre from presenting evidence supporting those categories of damages. Maxwell also requested reimbursement of attorney’s fees and expenses incurred because of the alleged discovery failures and asked the judge to warn Giuffre that continued noncompliance could ultimately result in dismissal of the lawsuit. The motion was aggressive in both language and remedy, essentially arguing that Giuffre should not be permitted to seek significant physical and emotional damages while, in Maxwell’s view, withholding the very medical evidence Maxwell needed to challenge those claims. Those were Maxwell’s allegations and arguments in the sanctions motion, not findings by the court that Giuffre had actually engaged in deception or violated the discovery rules.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75359688Sun, 04 Oct 2026 16:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciGhislaine Maxwell’s motion for sanctions under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 37(b) and 37(c) accused Virginia Giuffre of repeatedly failing to comply with discovery requirements in the defamation lawsuit between them. Maxwell argued that an April...
Maxwell therefore asked the court to impose substantial discovery sanctions. Her primary request was to strike Giuffre’s claims for damages involving psychological pain, emotional distress, physical and psychiatric injuries, medical expenses, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity and invasion of privacy; alternatively, Maxwell sought an order preventing Giuffre from presenting evidence supporting those categories of damages. Maxwell also requested reimbursement of attorney’s fees and expenses incurred because of the alleged discovery failures and asked the judge to warn Giuffre that continued noncompliance could ultimately result in dismissal of the lawsuit. The motion was aggressive in both language and remedy, essentially arguing that Giuffre should not be permitted to seek significant physical and emotional damages while, in Maxwell’s view, withholding the very medical evidence Maxwell needed to challenge those claims. Those were Maxwell’s allegations and arguments in the sanctions motion, not findings by the court that Giuffre had actually engaged in deception or violated the discovery rules.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>659epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-prince-andrew-and-the-memoir-that-never-came-10-4-26--75549555
Despite the speculation, the memoir never materialized. Andrew ultimately did not publish a book, and the project appeared to stall amid concerns about whether recounting his version of events would create more problems than it solved. Any memoir would have subjected his claims to intense scrutiny, potentially reopened questions about Epstein and Giuffre, and risked further friction with the royal family. In the end, the idea remained just that: an idea repeatedly floated in the press but never turned into a finished, published account.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75549555Sun, 04 Oct 2026 14:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciPrince Andrew reportedly considered writing a memoir as part of an effort to tell his side of the story after his public downfall over his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and the allegations made by Virginia Giuffre. Reports said he discussed the...
Despite the speculation, the memoir never materialized. Andrew ultimately did not publish a book, and the project appeared to stall amid concerns about whether recounting his version of events would create more problems than it solved. Any memoir would have subjected his claims to intense scrutiny, potentially reopened questions about Epstein and Giuffre, and risked further friction with the royal family. In the end, the idea remained just that: an idea repeatedly floated in the press but never turned into a finished, published account.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2445epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-same-grifters-new-tactics-10-3-26--75549559
The damage caused by this approach is not merely rhetorical. It poisons public understanding, makes legitimate scrutiny harder, and buries serious questions beneath mountains of exaggeration and misinformation. In the Epstein case, these figures often treated survivors, court records, financial evidence, and documented institutional failures as secondary to whatever sensational theory attracted the most attention. With Charlie Kirk’s murder, they are once again elevating rumor over testimony, speculation over forensic evidence, and internet sleuthing over the evidentiary record presented in court. None of this means prosecutors should escape scrutiny or that every aspect of the case must be accepted without question. It means criticism must be grounded in facts rather than engineered suspicion. The same people who helped turn the Epstein investigation into a circus of competing fantasies are now trying to do the same thing to the Tyler Robinson trial, and unless their tactics are confronted directly, the pursuit of truth will once again be drowned out by the pursuit of profit.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75549559Sun, 04 Oct 2026 12:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe same grifters who spent years polluting the Epstein case with unsupported claims, selective evidence, manufactured certainty, and endless insinuation are now applying the same playbook to the murder of Charlie Kirk and the prosecution of Tyler...
The damage caused by this approach is not merely rhetorical. It poisons public understanding, makes legitimate scrutiny harder, and buries serious questions beneath mountains of exaggeration and misinformation. In the Epstein case, these figures often treated survivors, court records, financial evidence, and documented institutional failures as secondary to whatever sensational theory attracted the most attention. With Charlie Kirk’s murder, they are once again elevating rumor over testimony, speculation over forensic evidence, and internet sleuthing over the evidentiary record presented in court. None of this means prosecutors should escape scrutiny or that every aspect of the case must be accepted without question. It means criticism must be grounded in facts rather than engineered suspicion. The same people who helped turn the Epstein investigation into a circus of competing fantasies are now trying to do the same thing to the Tyler Robinson trial, and unless their tactics are confronted directly, the pursuit of truth will once again be drowned out by the pursuit of profit.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2163epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-pam-bondi-and-her-epic-epstein-related-fumble-10-4-26--75549558
Critics in Congress, the media and even within the administration accused Bondi and the Justice Department of trying to close the book on Epstein rather than aggressively pursue the unanswered questions surrounding his network. The July memo explicitly said that “no further disclosure would be appropriate or warranted,” a position that generated enough backlash that the issue continued through lawsuits, congressional scrutiny and eventually the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which forced a much larger release of records. Courts later noted the widespread controversy over the department’s reversal on disclosure, and the House Oversight Committee eventually moved to subpoena Bondi over DOJ’s handling of the files. Bondi and the department defended their work as an exhaustive review constrained by victim privacy, sealed records and the absence of evidence supporting new prosecutions, but the sequence of promises, limited releases, contradictory messaging and the attempt to declare the review essentially finished left her handling of the Epstein matter under sustained scrutiny.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75549558Sun, 04 Oct 2026 10:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciPam Bondi’s handling of the Epstein files became a major source of controversy after she publicly raised expectations that the Justice Department was about to deliver significant new transparency, only for the initial February 2025 release to consist...
Critics in Congress, the media and even within the administration accused Bondi and the Justice Department of trying to close the book on Epstein rather than aggressively pursue the unanswered questions surrounding his network. The July memo explicitly said that “no further disclosure would be appropriate or warranted,” a position that generated enough backlash that the issue continued through lawsuits, congressional scrutiny and eventually the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which forced a much larger release of records. Courts later noted the widespread controversy over the department’s reversal on disclosure, and the House Oversight Committee eventually moved to subpoena Bondi over DOJ’s handling of the files. Bondi and the department defended their work as an exhaustive review constrained by victim privacy, sealed records and the absence of evidence supporting new prosecutions, but the sequence of promises, limited releases, contradictory messaging and the attempt to declare the review essentially finished left her handling of the Epstein matter under sustained scrutiny.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3853epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-the-his-plan-to-hide-behind-charitable-giving-s-10-4-26--75549557
Every donation, dinner, academic relationship and institutional connection helped reinforce the image of a man still accepted by powerful circles despite his criminal history. Critics later argued that some institutions were far too willing to take his money and access while overlooking what was already publicly known about him. In that sense, Epstein’s philanthropy functioned like armor around his reputation, helping insulate him from the full consequences of the abuse allegations and allowing him to remain connected to elite networks long after he should have become untouchable.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonnail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75549557Sun, 04 Oct 2026 08:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciAfter Jeffrey Epstein was accused of sexually abusing girls, he increasingly leaned on philanthropy, science and elite institutions as a form of reputational armor. He donated money to universities, researchers, scientists and charitable causes,...
Every donation, dinner, academic relationship and institutional connection helped reinforce the image of a man still accepted by powerful circles despite his criminal history. Critics later argued that some institutions were far too willing to take his money and access while overlooking what was already publicly known about him. In that sense, Epstein’s philanthropy functioned like armor around his reputation, helping insulate him from the full consequences of the abuse allegations and allowing him to remain connected to elite networks long after he should have become untouchable.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonnail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3359epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-his-fugazi-science-foundation-10-4-26--75549556
Nathan stopped short of disciplining Markus for the op-ed itself, noting there had been some uncertainty over whether the local rule technically applied to him because he was handling appellate matters rather than appearing as Maxwell’s trial counsel. But she removed any uncertainty going forward. Nathan ordered Markus to comply with Local Criminal Rule 23.1 and emphasized that public statements expressing opinions about a defendant’s guilt or innocence, the strength of the evidence or the merits of a pending case could create a substantial risk of interfering with a fair trial. The message from the court was straightforward: whatever ambiguity may have existed before the op-ed was now gone, and Markus, along with other attorneys associated with the Maxwell case, was formally on notice that their public commentary would be governed by the court’s restrictions.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75549556Sun, 04 Oct 2026 06:30:03 +0000Bobby CapucciJudge Alison Nathan responded sharply after one of Ghislaine Maxwell’s appellate lawyers, David Markus, published a June 2021 New York Daily News op-ed arguing that Maxwell should benefit from the same kind of prosecutorial-agreement reasoning that...
Nathan stopped short of disciplining Markus for the op-ed itself, noting there had been some uncertainty over whether the local rule technically applied to him because he was handling appellate matters rather than appearing as Maxwell’s trial counsel. But she removed any uncertainty going forward. Nathan ordered Markus to comply with Local Criminal Rule 23.1 and emphasized that public statements expressing opinions about a defendant’s guilt or innocence, the strength of the evidence or the merits of a pending case could create a substantial risk of interfering with a fair trial. The message from the court was straightforward: whatever ambiguity may have existed before the op-ed was now gone, and Markus, along with other attorneys associated with the Maxwell case, was formally on notice that their public commentary would be governed by the court’s restrictions.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3517epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/american-murder-gabby-petito--75549794

In addition to recounting the timeline of events, "American Murder: Gabby Petito" explores the broader societal implications of the case, including the role of social media in shaping public perception and the challenges of identifying and addressing intimate partner violence. The series emphasizes the contrast between the couple's curated online presence and the reality of their tumultuous relationship, prompting discussions about the pressures of social media and the importance of recognizing warning signs of abuse. By presenting previously unseen texts, diary entries, and interviews with those closest to Gabby, the docuseries aims to honor her memory while raising awareness about the pervasive issue of domestic violence.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

The inside story of how Gabby Petito was murdered by her boyfriend: From sickening 'burn after reading' letter, to the family cover-up and final confrontation | Daily Mail Online

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75549794Sun, 04 Oct 2026 04:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe Netflix docuseries "American Murder: Gabby Petito" delves into the tragic story of 22-year-old vlogger Gabby Petito, who was murdered by her fiancé, Brian Laundrie, during their cross-country road trip in 2021. Directed by Julia Willoughby Nason...

In addition to recounting the timeline of events, "American Murder: Gabby Petito" explores the broader societal implications of the case, including the role of social media in shaping public perception and the challenges of identifying and addressing intimate partner violence. The series emphasizes the contrast between the couple's curated online presence and the reality of their tumultuous relationship, prompting discussions about the pressures of social media and the importance of recognizing warning signs of abuse. By presenting previously unseen texts, diary entries, and interviews with those closest to Gabby, the docuseries aims to honor her memory while raising awareness about the pervasive issue of domestic violence.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

The inside story of how Gabby Petito was murdered by her boyfriend: From sickening 'burn after reading' letter, to the family cover-up and final confrontation | Daily Mail Online

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1428breakingnews,breakingnewsdaily,breakingnewsreports,breakingnewsupdates,dailybreakingnews,news,newscommentary,newsthatmatterstoyou,newsupdates,truecrime,truecrimecommentary,truecrimedailynews,truecrimenews,truecrimenewsupdate,truecrimeupdate,usnews,worldnews,worldnewsupdatestruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/gone-but-not-forgotten-the-murder-of-laken-riley--75549795
Ibarra was arrested and charged with multiple offenses, including malice murder, felony murder, kidnapping, and aggravated assault with intent to rape. In November 2024, following a bench trial, he was found guilty on all counts and sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. The case drew national attention, fueling debates on immigration policies and public safety. In response, the U.S. Congress passed the "Laken Riley Act," mandating the detention of undocumented immigrants charged with or convicted of certain crimes. President Donald Trump signed the bill into law on January 29, 2025, marking it as the first legislation of his second term.


to  contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75549795Sun, 04 Oct 2026 02:30:03 +0000Bobby Capucci​On February 22, 2024, 22-year-old nursing student Laken Riley was tragically murdered while jogging on the University of Georgia campus in Athens. Her body was discovered in Oconee Forest Park near Lake Herrick, with the cause of death determined as...
Ibarra was arrested and charged with multiple offenses, including malice murder, felony murder, kidnapping, and aggravated assault with intent to rape. In November 2024, following a bench trial, he was found guilty on all counts and sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. The case drew national attention, fueling debates on immigration policies and public safety. In response, the U.S. Congress passed the "Laken Riley Act," mandating the detention of undocumented immigrants charged with or convicted of certain crimes. President Donald Trump signed the bill into law on January 29, 2025, marking it as the first legislation of his second term.


to  contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2643breakingnews,breakingnewsdaily,breakingnewsreports,breakingnewsupdates,dailybreakingnews,news,newscommentary,newsthatmatterstoyou,newsupdates,truecrime,truecrimecommentary,truecrimedailynews,truecrimenews,truecrimenewsupdate,truecrimeupdate,usnews,worldnews,worldnewsupdatestruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcripts-day-3-part-2-10-2-26--75490096
A major portion of the shortened hearing was consumed by a fight over whether prosecutors could publicly play a recorded interview with Twiggs, Robinson’s roommate and romantic partner. Davis testified that Twiggs had been interviewed twice and had been granted limited use immunity for his statements. Prosecutors wanted to introduce the later recorded interview with relatively few restrictions, while Robinson’s attorneys argued that large portions should be redacted to protect his right to a fair trial and prevent potentially prejudicial material from being widely circulated before a jury was ever selected. The Kirk family’s attorney argued in favor of greater public access, while Judge Tony Graf said he had to balance transparency against Robinson’s constitutional rights. Graf ultimately directed prosecutors to return with an edited version of the video, leaving the dispute to carry over into the next day of the preliminary hearing.

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75490096Sun, 04 Oct 2026 00:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay three of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing focused largely on what happened after Robinson turned himself in following the killing of Charlie Kirk. Utah State Bureau of Investigation agent Brian Davis testified that he was sent to St. George...
A major portion of the shortened hearing was consumed by a fight over whether prosecutors could publicly play a recorded interview with Twiggs, Robinson’s roommate and romantic partner. Davis testified that Twiggs had been interviewed twice and had been granted limited use immunity for his statements. Prosecutors wanted to introduce the later recorded interview with relatively few restrictions, while Robinson’s attorneys argued that large portions should be redacted to protect his right to a fair trial and prevent potentially prejudicial material from being widely circulated before a jury was ever selected. The Kirk family’s attorney argued in favor of greater public access, while Judge Tony Graf said he had to balance transparency against Robinson’s constitutional rights. Graf ultimately directed prosecutors to return with an edited version of the video, leaving the dispute to carry over into the next day of the preliminary hearing.

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>850breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-last-will-and-testament-of-jeffrey-epstein-part-2-10-3-26--75549230
The will named two longtime Epstein associates—Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn—as executors, both of whom had close financial and legal ties to him for years. Critics immediately questioned the timing and secrecy, viewing it as a strategic move to protect his estate from victim compensation claims and government seizure. The creation of the trust also sparked concern among attorneys representing survivors, who feared it would obstruct justice and delay reparations. The move exemplified the kind of legal maneuvering Epstein was known for, even in death—securing the secrecy of his finances and shielding his inner circle from full exposure.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


DisplayFile.aspx (vicourts.org)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75549230Sat, 03 Oct 2026 22:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJust two days before his death, Jeffrey Epstein signed a last will and testament placing more than $577 million in assets into a trust known as The 1953 Trust, named after his birth year. The will, filed in the U.S. Virgin Islands, listed his...
The will named two longtime Epstein associates—Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn—as executors, both of whom had close financial and legal ties to him for years. Critics immediately questioned the timing and secrecy, viewing it as a strategic move to protect his estate from victim compensation claims and government seizure. The creation of the trust also sparked concern among attorneys representing survivors, who feared it would obstruct justice and delay reparations. The move exemplified the kind of legal maneuvering Epstein was known for, even in death—securing the secrecy of his finances and shielding his inner circle from full exposure.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


DisplayFile.aspx (vicourts.org)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1165epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-last-will-and-testament-of-jeffrey-epstein-part-1-10-3-26--75549229
The will named two longtime Epstein associates—Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn—as executors, both of whom had close financial and legal ties to him for years. Critics immediately questioned the timing and secrecy, viewing it as a strategic move to protect his estate from victim compensation claims and government seizure. The creation of the trust also sparked concern among attorneys representing survivors, who feared it would obstruct justice and delay reparations. The move exemplified the kind of legal maneuvering Epstein was known for, even in death—securing the secrecy of his finances and shielding his inner circle from full exposure.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


DisplayFile.aspx (vicourts.org)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75549229Sat, 03 Oct 2026 20:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJust two days before his death, Jeffrey Epstein signed a last will and testament placing more than $577 million in assets into a trust known as The 1953 Trust, named after his birth year. The will, filed in the U.S. Virgin Islands, listed his...
The will named two longtime Epstein associates—Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn—as executors, both of whom had close financial and legal ties to him for years. Critics immediately questioned the timing and secrecy, viewing it as a strategic move to protect his estate from victim compensation claims and government seizure. The creation of the trust also sparked concern among attorneys representing survivors, who feared it would obstruct justice and delay reparations. The move exemplified the kind of legal maneuvering Epstein was known for, even in death—securing the secrecy of his finances and shielding his inner circle from full exposure.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


DisplayFile.aspx (vicourts.org)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>741epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/federal-judge-orders-doj-to-expedite-epstein-foia-requests-part-4-10-3-26--75549210
The court did, however, reject DDF’s separate argument that it qualified for expedited processing under FOIA’s statutory “compelling need” provision. Kollar-Kotelly found that DDF had not shown it was primarily an information-dissemination organization, concluding that its principal activities were litigation and advocacy rather than journalism or publishing. That distinction did not undo the more important practical result: DOJ still has to move the Epstein-related requests to the front of the line under its own expedited-processing regulation. The September 30, 2026 ruling therefore amounted to a substantial transparency victory for DDF, forcing faster DOJ action on records concerning the government’s handling of Epstein materials while stopping short of granting every legal theory DDF advanced.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.284000.28.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75549210Sat, 03 Oct 2026 18:30:05 +0000Bobby CapucciJudge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly ruled that the Justice Department must expedite processing of most of Democracy Defenders Fund’s FOIA requests concerning Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and DOJ’s handling of the Epstein files. DDF had sought records...
The court did, however, reject DDF’s separate argument that it qualified for expedited processing under FOIA’s statutory “compelling need” provision. Kollar-Kotelly found that DDF had not shown it was primarily an information-dissemination organization, concluding that its principal activities were litigation and advocacy rather than journalism or publishing. That distinction did not undo the more important practical result: DOJ still has to move the Epstein-related requests to the front of the line under its own expedited-processing regulation. The September 30, 2026 ruling therefore amounted to a substantial transparency victory for DDF, forcing faster DOJ action on records concerning the government’s handling of Epstein materials while stopping short of granting every legal theory DDF advanced.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.284000.28.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>570epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/federal-judge-orders-doj-to-expedite-epstein-foia-requests-part-3-10-3-26--75549211
The court did, however, reject DDF’s separate argument that it qualified for expedited processing under FOIA’s statutory “compelling need” provision. Kollar-Kotelly found that DDF had not shown it was primarily an information-dissemination organization, concluding that its principal activities were litigation and advocacy rather than journalism or publishing. That distinction did not undo the more important practical result: DOJ still has to move the Epstein-related requests to the front of the line under its own expedited-processing regulation. The September 30, 2026 ruling therefore amounted to a substantial transparency victory for DDF, forcing faster DOJ action on records concerning the government’s handling of Epstein materials while stopping short of granting every legal theory DDF advanced.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.284000.28.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75549211Sat, 03 Oct 2026 16:30:03 +0000Bobby CapucciJudge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly ruled that the Justice Department must expedite processing of most of Democracy Defenders Fund’s FOIA requests concerning Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and DOJ’s handling of the Epstein files. DDF had sought records...
The court did, however, reject DDF’s separate argument that it qualified for expedited processing under FOIA’s statutory “compelling need” provision. Kollar-Kotelly found that DDF had not shown it was primarily an information-dissemination organization, concluding that its principal activities were litigation and advocacy rather than journalism or publishing. That distinction did not undo the more important practical result: DOJ still has to move the Epstein-related requests to the front of the line under its own expedited-processing regulation. The September 30, 2026 ruling therefore amounted to a substantial transparency victory for DDF, forcing faster DOJ action on records concerning the government’s handling of Epstein materials while stopping short of granting every legal theory DDF advanced.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.284000.28.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>648epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-the-blurred-political-line-10-3-26--75527777
The same was true geographically. Epstein’s operation stretched far beyond Palm Beach and New York, reaching the U.S. Virgin Islands, New Mexico, Paris, London and other locations tied to his travel, properties and associates. Victims were recruited and moved through an international network, while money, aircraft, businesses and social relationships crossed borders just as easily. Epstein’s crimes were therefore both transpartisan and global in nature, involving institutions and individuals in multiple countries and jurisdictions. Understanding the full scope of the case requires looking past political tribalism and treating it as what it was: an international criminal enterprise sustained by wealth, access and a remarkably broad network of people and institutions.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75527777Sat, 03 Oct 2026 14:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJeffrey Epstein’s crimes did not fit neatly into any political party, ideology or partisan narrative. His network included wealthy and influential people from across the political spectrum, along with figures from finance, academia, royalty, business...
The same was true geographically. Epstein’s operation stretched far beyond Palm Beach and New York, reaching the U.S. Virgin Islands, New Mexico, Paris, London and other locations tied to his travel, properties and associates. Victims were recruited and moved through an international network, while money, aircraft, businesses and social relationships crossed borders just as easily. Epstein’s crimes were therefore both transpartisan and global in nature, involving institutions and individuals in multiple countries and jurisdictions. Understanding the full scope of the case requires looking past political tribalism and treating it as what it was: an international criminal enterprise sustained by wealth, access and a remarkably broad network of people and institutions.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3459epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-his-fellow-travelers-10-3-26--75527776Jeffrey Epstein’s relationships with George Mitchell, Frédéric Fekkai and Marvin Minsky showed how deeply his network reached into politics, luxury services and academia. Former Senate Majority Leader George Mitchell appeared in Epstein-related records and was accused by Virginia Giuffre of being one of the powerful men she said Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell directed her to have sex with while she was underage. Mitchell denied ever meeting Giuffre and denied any wrongdoing. Celebrity hairstylist Frédéric Fekkai was also part of Epstein’s social circle and later came under scrutiny over allegations that women in Epstein’s orbit were sent to his salons to be styled at Epstein’s direction. Seven women eventually sued Fekkai and related defendants, alleging that the salon relationship formed part of a broader grooming process in which they were made to look younger and more sexually appealing to Epstein. Fekkai denied knowing about Epstein’s crimes or participating in abuse.

Marvin Minsky, the influential MIT artificial-intelligence pioneer, was connected to Epstein through academic and philanthropic circles. Epstein donated money to support Minsky’s research at MIT, and records showed that the two remained in contact. Giuffre later alleged that Maxwell directed her to have sex with Minsky on Epstein’s private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands. Minsky died in 2016, before the allegation became widely public, and his family later disputed the suggestion that he had engaged in sexual misconduct. Taken together, the three men represented different parts of Epstein’s world: Mitchell reflected his access to political power, Fekkai his connections to elite personal and lifestyle services, and Minsky his ability to cultivate intellectual prestige. Each relationship later became part of the broader effort to understand how Epstein embedded himself among influential people and how allegations connected to his trafficking operation reached far beyond the people who were ultimately prosecuted.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75527776Sat, 03 Oct 2026 12:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJeffrey Epstein’s relationships with George Mitchell, Frédéric Fekkai and Marvin Minsky showed how deeply his network reached into politics, luxury services and academia. Former Senate Majority Leader George Mitchell appeared in Epstein-related...Jeffrey Epstein’s relationships with George Mitchell, Frédéric Fekkai and Marvin Minsky showed how deeply his network reached into politics, luxury services and academia. Former Senate Majority Leader George Mitchell appeared in Epstein-related records and was accused by Virginia Giuffre of being one of the powerful men she said Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell directed her to have sex with while she was underage. Mitchell denied ever meeting Giuffre and denied any wrongdoing. Celebrity hairstylist Frédéric Fekkai was also part of Epstein’s social circle and later came under scrutiny over allegations that women in Epstein’s orbit were sent to his salons to be styled at Epstein’s direction. Seven women eventually sued Fekkai and related defendants, alleging that the salon relationship formed part of a broader grooming process in which they were made to look younger and more sexually appealing to Epstein. Fekkai denied knowing about Epstein’s crimes or participating in abuse.

Marvin Minsky, the influential MIT artificial-intelligence pioneer, was connected to Epstein through academic and philanthropic circles. Epstein donated money to support Minsky’s research at MIT, and records showed that the two remained in contact. Giuffre later alleged that Maxwell directed her to have sex with Minsky on Epstein’s private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands. Minsky died in 2016, before the allegation became widely public, and his family later disputed the suggestion that he had engaged in sexual misconduct. Taken together, the three men represented different parts of Epstein’s world: Mitchell reflected his access to political power, Fekkai his connections to elite personal and lifestyle services, and Minsky his ability to cultivate intellectual prestige. Each relationship later became part of the broader effort to understand how Epstein embedded himself among influential people and how allegations connected to his trafficking operation reached far beyond the people who were ultimately prosecuted.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3454epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-howard-lutnick-and-the-epstein-duck-and-dodge-routine-10-3-26--75527775

That gap between Lutnick’s description and the records became even more pronounced when he testified before Congress. Lutnick characterized his interactions with Epstein as minimal, “meaningless and inconsequential,” and said he had no personal or professional relationship with him. Yet the emails showed enough familiarity for Lutnick to coordinate a family trip to Epstein’s island, communicate directly with him and continue interacting years after the point when he said he had written Epstein off. Lutnick has not been accused of participating in Epstein’s crimes, and the records do not show misconduct during the 2012 visit. The criticism has centered instead on credibility: the documentary evidence has repeatedly forced revisions or qualifications to a story that was originally presented as little more than a brief encounter followed by a permanent cutoff.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75527775Sat, 03 Oct 2026 10:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciHoward Lutnick’s public account of his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein has drawn scrutiny because key parts of it have not lined up neatly with the documentary record. Lutnick said that he and his wife essentially cut Epstein off in 2005 after a...

That gap between Lutnick’s description and the records became even more pronounced when he testified before Congress. Lutnick characterized his interactions with Epstein as minimal, “meaningless and inconsequential,” and said he had no personal or professional relationship with him. Yet the emails showed enough familiarity for Lutnick to coordinate a family trip to Epstein’s island, communicate directly with him and continue interacting years after the point when he said he had written Epstein off. Lutnick has not been accused of participating in Epstein’s crimes, and the records do not show misconduct during the 2012 visit. The criticism has centered instead on credibility: the documentary evidence has repeatedly forced revisions or qualifications to a story that was originally presented as little more than a brief encounter followed by a permanent cutoff.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3198epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-alan-dershowitz-and-the-criticism-he-has-faced-due-to-his-epstein-relationship-10-3-26--75527774
The most serious controversy came from Virginia Giuffre, who accused Dershowitz of sexually abusing her while she was being trafficked by Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Dershowitz categorically denied the allegation and fought Giuffre for years in highly contentious defamation litigation, publicly accusing her of lying and attempting to prove that she had misidentified him. In 2022, the two ended their lawsuits with a settlement in which Giuffre said she recognized that she may have made a mistake in identifying Dershowitz.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75527774Sat, 03 Oct 2026 08:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciAlan Dershowitz has faced sustained criticism over both his legal work for Jeffrey Epstein and the depth of his personal relationship with him. Dershowitz was part of Epstein’s defense team during the Florida investigation that ultimately produced the...
The most serious controversy came from Virginia Giuffre, who accused Dershowitz of sexually abusing her while she was being trafficked by Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Dershowitz categorically denied the allegation and fought Giuffre for years in highly contentious defamation litigation, publicly accusing her of lying and attempting to prove that she had misidentified him. In 2022, the two ended their lawsuits with a settlement in which Giuffre said she recognized that she may have made a mistake in identifying Dershowitz.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2518epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-the-strategy-used-by-his-estate-10-2-26--75527773
Critically, the estate’s approach functioned less as a mechanism for justice and more as a final layer of damage control for Epstein and his circle. Survivors were forced into prolonged litigation, compelled to battle an entity flush with resources yet repeatedly claiming financial constraints when it suited strategic objectives. Requests for transparency were met with claims of confidentiality, ongoing proceedings, or administrative complexity, effectively obscuring potentially damaging information. In practice, the estate became an extension of Epstein’s lifetime strategy: minimize exposure, slow momentum, and exhaust challengers until public attention fades. What was presented as an orderly wind-down instead operated as a calculated effort to preserve secrecy, protect powerful interests, and ensure that accountability remained partial, delayed, and incomplete.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75527773Sat, 03 Oct 2026 06:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn the aftermath of Jeffrey Epstein’s death, the Epstein estate adopted a strategy that prioritized insulation and control over transparency or accountability. Rather than facilitating a clean accounting of Epstein’s finances, associates, and network,...
Critically, the estate’s approach functioned less as a mechanism for justice and more as a final layer of damage control for Epstein and his circle. Survivors were forced into prolonged litigation, compelled to battle an entity flush with resources yet repeatedly claiming financial constraints when it suited strategic objectives. Requests for transparency were met with claims of confidentiality, ongoing proceedings, or administrative complexity, effectively obscuring potentially damaging information. In practice, the estate became an extension of Epstein’s lifetime strategy: minimize exposure, slow momentum, and exhaust challengers until public attention fades. What was presented as an orderly wind-down instead operated as a calculated effort to preserve secrecy, protect powerful interests, and ensure that accountability remained partial, delayed, and incomplete.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3509breakingnews,dailydiddyreport,diddy,diddydiaries,diddynews,diddynewscentral,diddynewsdaily,diddynewsupdates,diddyontrial,diddytrial,diddytrialnews,diddytrialnewsupdate,diddytrialupdates,news,newsupdate,seancombs,seancombsnews,seandiddycombstrial,thetrialofdiddy,truecrimetruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-bryan-kohberger-reply-s-to-the-states-google-warrant-objections--75527917
The defense also attacks the lack of specificity in the warrants, claiming they amounted to a sweeping data grab without clear limits or guidelines for execution. According to the filing, the warrants did not set out objective standards for determining what data should be seized and failed to distinguish between potentially relevant and lawful content held by Google. The defense further states that even if the affidavits had been included, they contained overly broad language—failing to meet the constitutional requirement that warrants be narrowly tailored to avoid unjustified intrusions into privacy. They urge the court to suppress all data obtained from these warrants, arguing that the state cannot retroactively fix foundational defects in their execution.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

121924-Reply-PAs-Objection-Motion-Suppress-Memo-Google.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75527917Sat, 03 Oct 2026 04:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn this filing, Bryan Kohberger’s defense team replies to the prosecution’s objection regarding their motion to suppress evidence obtained from three Google search warrants issued in early 2023. The defense argues that the warrants were...
The defense also attacks the lack of specificity in the warrants, claiming they amounted to a sweeping data grab without clear limits or guidelines for execution. According to the filing, the warrants did not set out objective standards for determining what data should be seized and failed to distinguish between potentially relevant and lawful content held by Google. The defense further states that even if the affidavits had been included, they contained overly broad language—failing to meet the constitutional requirement that warrants be narrowly tailored to avoid unjustified intrusions into privacy. They urge the court to suppress all data obtained from these warrants, arguing that the state cannot retroactively fix foundational defects in their execution.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

121924-Reply-PAs-Objection-Motion-Suppress-Memo-Google.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>550bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-bryan-kohberger-s-motion-in-limine-to-exclude-amazon-clicks--75527916
The motion also raises concerns about the reliability and admissibility of digital evidence, questioning whether proper forensic procedures were followed in retrieving and analyzing the Amazon activity logs. The defense argues that without concrete proof of the defendant personally conducting the searches or purchases, the evidence should be deemed inadmissible under evidentiary rules prohibiting undue prejudice and speculation. Additionally, they highlight the potential for false assumptions, as online browsing does not necessarily indicate criminal intent. The motion urges the court to prevent the prosecution from introducing Amazon click activity at trial, arguing that its inclusion would create an unfair bias against the defendant without definitive proof of its relevance to the charges.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

022425-Defense-Motion-inLimine-9-RE-Excluding-Amazon-Click-Activity-Evidence.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75527916Sat, 03 Oct 2026 02:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn Case Number CR01-24-31665, Motion in Limine #9 seeks to exclude evidence related to Amazon click activity from being presented at trial. The defense argues that the Amazon browsing history, purchase records, or any click activity are irrelevant,...
The motion also raises concerns about the reliability and admissibility of digital evidence, questioning whether proper forensic procedures were followed in retrieving and analyzing the Amazon activity logs. The defense argues that without concrete proof of the defendant personally conducting the searches or purchases, the evidence should be deemed inadmissible under evidentiary rules prohibiting undue prejudice and speculation. Additionally, they highlight the potential for false assumptions, as online browsing does not necessarily indicate criminal intent. The motion urges the court to prevent the prosecution from introducing Amazon click activity at trial, arguing that its inclusion would create an unfair bias against the defendant without definitive proof of its relevance to the charges.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

022425-Defense-Motion-inLimine-9-RE-Excluding-Amazon-Click-Activity-Evidence.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>756bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcripts-day-3-part-1-10-2-26--75490094
A major portion of the shortened hearing was consumed by a fight over whether prosecutors could publicly play a recorded interview with Twiggs, Robinson’s roommate and romantic partner. Davis testified that Twiggs had been interviewed twice and had been granted limited use immunity for his statements. Prosecutors wanted to introduce the later recorded interview with relatively few restrictions, while Robinson’s attorneys argued that large portions should be redacted to protect his right to a fair trial and prevent potentially prejudicial material from being widely circulated before a jury was ever selected. The Kirk family’s attorney argued in favor of greater public access, while Judge Tony Graf said he had to balance transparency against Robinson’s constitutional rights. Graf ultimately directed prosecutors to return with an edited version of the video, leaving the dispute to carry over into the next day of the preliminary hearing.

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75490094Sat, 03 Oct 2026 00:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay three of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing focused largely on what happened after Robinson turned himself in following the killing of Charlie Kirk. Utah State Bureau of Investigation agent Brian Davis testified that he was sent to St. George...
A major portion of the shortened hearing was consumed by a fight over whether prosecutors could publicly play a recorded interview with Twiggs, Robinson’s roommate and romantic partner. Davis testified that Twiggs had been interviewed twice and had been granted limited use immunity for his statements. Prosecutors wanted to introduce the later recorded interview with relatively few restrictions, while Robinson’s attorneys argued that large portions should be redacted to protect his right to a fair trial and prevent potentially prejudicial material from being widely circulated before a jury was ever selected. The Kirk family’s attorney argued in favor of greater public access, while Judge Tony Graf said he had to balance transparency against Robinson’s constitutional rights. Graf ultimately directed prosecutors to return with an edited version of the video, leaving the dispute to carry over into the next day of the preliminary hearing.

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>701breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcripts-day-2-part-19-9-30-26--75463715
The defense spent much of the day attacking how strongly the forensic evidence could actually be interpreted. FBI forensic examiner Amanda Bakker was questioned for roughly three hours as defense attorney Michael Burt dug into the technical details of the DNA testing, mixtures, statistical interpretation and the limitations of what the results could establish about when or how DNA was deposited on the objects. Robinson’s lawyers also pushed back against the State’s motive theory, challenging the attempt to characterize the killing as being driven by Kirk’s religious beliefs in addition to political disagreement. By the end of day two, prosecutors had added important physical evidence to the surveillance case presented on day one, but the defense had begun laying out the approach it would use throughout the hearing: concede that certain items contained Robinson-associated evidence while aggressively challenging what that evidence actually proved about possession, timing, motive and the circumstances of Kirk’s killing.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75463715Fri, 02 Oct 2026 22:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay two of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing focused heavily on prosecutors’ effort to connect Robinson to the Utah Valley University campus and to the physical evidence recovered after Charlie Kirk was shot. Investigators introduced additional...
The defense spent much of the day attacking how strongly the forensic evidence could actually be interpreted. FBI forensic examiner Amanda Bakker was questioned for roughly three hours as defense attorney Michael Burt dug into the technical details of the DNA testing, mixtures, statistical interpretation and the limitations of what the results could establish about when or how DNA was deposited on the objects. Robinson’s lawyers also pushed back against the State’s motive theory, challenging the attempt to characterize the killing as being driven by Kirk’s religious beliefs in addition to political disagreement. By the end of day two, prosecutors had added important physical evidence to the surveillance case presented on day one, but the defense had begun laying out the approach it would use throughout the hearing: concede that certain items contained Robinson-associated evidence while aggressively challenging what that evidence actually proved about possession, timing, motive and the circumstances of Kirk’s killing.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1486breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/federal-judge-orders-doj-to-expedite-epstein-foia-requests-part-2-10-1-26--75490095
The court did, however, reject DDF’s separate argument that it qualified for expedited processing under FOIA’s statutory “compelling need” provision. Kollar-Kotelly found that DDF had not shown it was primarily an information-dissemination organization, concluding that its principal activities were litigation and advocacy rather than journalism or publishing. That distinction did not undo the more important practical result: DOJ still has to move the Epstein-related requests to the front of the line under its own expedited-processing regulation. The September 30, 2026 ruling therefore amounted to a substantial transparency victory for DDF, forcing faster DOJ action on records concerning the government’s handling of Epstein materials while stopping short of granting every legal theory DDF advanced.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.284000.28.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75490095Fri, 02 Oct 2026 20:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJudge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly ruled that the Justice Department must expedite processing of most of Democracy Defenders Fund’s FOIA requests concerning Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and DOJ’s handling of the Epstein files. DDF had sought records...
The court did, however, reject DDF’s separate argument that it qualified for expedited processing under FOIA’s statutory “compelling need” provision. Kollar-Kotelly found that DDF had not shown it was primarily an information-dissemination organization, concluding that its principal activities were litigation and advocacy rather than journalism or publishing. That distinction did not undo the more important practical result: DOJ still has to move the Epstein-related requests to the front of the line under its own expedited-processing regulation. The September 30, 2026 ruling therefore amounted to a substantial transparency victory for DDF, forcing faster DOJ action on records concerning the government’s handling of Epstein materials while stopping short of granting every legal theory DDF advanced.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.284000.28.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>616epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/federal-judge-orders-doj-to-expedite-epstein-foia-requests-part-1-10-2-26--75490093
The court did, however, reject DDF’s separate argument that it qualified for expedited processing under FOIA’s statutory “compelling need” provision. Kollar-Kotelly found that DDF had not shown it was primarily an information-dissemination organization, concluding that its principal activities were litigation and advocacy rather than journalism or publishing. That distinction did not undo the more important practical result: DOJ still has to move the Epstein-related requests to the front of the line under its own expedited-processing regulation. The September 30, 2026 ruling therefore amounted to a substantial transparency victory for DDF, forcing faster DOJ action on records concerning the government’s handling of Epstein materials while stopping short of granting every legal theory DDF advanced.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.284000.28.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75490093Fri, 02 Oct 2026 18:30:04 +0000Bobby CapucciJudge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly ruled that the Justice Department must expedite processing of most of Democracy Defenders Fund’s FOIA requests concerning Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and DOJ’s handling of the Epstein files. DDF had sought records...
The court did, however, reject DDF’s separate argument that it qualified for expedited processing under FOIA’s statutory “compelling need” provision. Kollar-Kotelly found that DDF had not shown it was primarily an information-dissemination organization, concluding that its principal activities were litigation and advocacy rather than journalism or publishing. That distinction did not undo the more important practical result: DOJ still has to move the Epstein-related requests to the front of the line under its own expedited-processing regulation. The September 30, 2026 ruling therefore amounted to a substantial transparency victory for DDF, forcing faster DOJ action on records concerning the government’s handling of Epstein materials while stopping short of granting every legal theory DDF advanced.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.284000.28.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>838epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-epstein-witnesses-had-their-say-now-compare-it-to-the-evidence-part-2-10-2-26--75490097
If investigators identify material statements that appear knowingly false, Congress should document the contradiction, give the witness an opportunity to explain it and, where warranted, refer the matter to federal prosecutors under the applicable false-statements or perjury statutes. The committee has already shown that it is willing to enforce subpoenas, pursue contempt and make criminal referrals in other parts of the Epstein investigation, so there is little excuse for ignoring potentially false testimony given directly to Congress. The question now is whether the Comer-led investigation will actually follow the evidence to its logical conclusion or allow another Epstein inquiry to die in a pile of transcripts, unanswered questions and convenient memories. The time for collecting statements is largely over. The next phase should be verification, confrontation and accountability.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75490097Fri, 02 Oct 2026 16:30:03 +0000Bobby CapucciNow that Congress has taken testimony from figures including Darren Indyke, Richard Kahn, Kathryn Ruemmler, Sarah Kellen, Lesley Groff and Tova Noel, the real investigative work should be beginning, not ending. Their statements should be...
If investigators identify material statements that appear knowingly false, Congress should document the contradiction, give the witness an opportunity to explain it and, where warranted, refer the matter to federal prosecutors under the applicable false-statements or perjury statutes. The committee has already shown that it is willing to enforce subpoenas, pursue contempt and make criminal referrals in other parts of the Epstein investigation, so there is little excuse for ignoring potentially false testimony given directly to Congress. The question now is whether the Comer-led investigation will actually follow the evidence to its logical conclusion or allow another Epstein inquiry to die in a pile of transcripts, unanswered questions and convenient memories. The time for collecting statements is largely over. The next phase should be verification, confrontation and accountability.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1267epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverupfalsefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-epstein-witnesses-had-their-say-now-compare-it-to-the-evidence-part-1-10-2-26--75490092
If investigators identify material statements that appear knowingly false, Congress should document the contradiction, give the witness an opportunity to explain it and, where warranted, refer the matter to federal prosecutors under the applicable false-statements or perjury statutes. The committee has already shown that it is willing to enforce subpoenas, pursue contempt and make criminal referrals in other parts of the Epstein investigation, so there is little excuse for ignoring potentially false testimony given directly to Congress. The question now is whether the Comer-led investigation will actually follow the evidence to its logical conclusion or allow another Epstein inquiry to die in a pile of transcripts, unanswered questions and convenient memories. The time for collecting statements is largely over. The next phase should be verification, confrontation and accountability.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75490092Fri, 02 Oct 2026 14:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciNow that Congress has taken testimony from figures including Darren Indyke, Richard Kahn, Kathryn Ruemmler, Sarah Kellen, Lesley Groff and Tova Noel, the real investigative work should be beginning, not ending. Their statements should be...
If investigators identify material statements that appear knowingly false, Congress should document the contradiction, give the witness an opportunity to explain it and, where warranted, refer the matter to federal prosecutors under the applicable false-statements or perjury statutes. The committee has already shown that it is willing to enforce subpoenas, pursue contempt and make criminal referrals in other parts of the Epstein investigation, so there is little excuse for ignoring potentially false testimony given directly to Congress. The question now is whether the Comer-led investigation will actually follow the evidence to its logical conclusion or allow another Epstein inquiry to die in a pile of transcripts, unanswered questions and convenient memories. The time for collecting statements is largely over. The next phase should be verification, confrontation and accountability.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>689epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/jane-doe-3-and-her-unredacted-motion-for-anonymity-against-indyke-kahn-and-the-epstein-estate-10-2-26--75493460
Judge Subramanian rejected that effort at the time, finding that the balance of interests still favored protecting Jane Doe 3’s identity. He noted the highly sensitive nature of the allegations, the potential harm that disclosure could cause and the fact that Indyke and Kahn already knew who she was, limiting any prejudice to their ability to defend the case. At the same time, the judge warned that anonymity was not necessarily permanent and could be reconsidered if Doe became the representative of a certified class or if the case survived summary judgment and moved closer to trial. The ruling therefore allowed her to remain Jane Doe 3 while the litigation continued, but left open the possibility that the court could require public identification later in the case.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75493460Fri, 02 Oct 2026 12:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJane Doe 3 asked the federal court to allow her to continue using a pseudonym in her lawsuits against Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, including the related action in which they are sued as co-executors of Jeffrey Epstein’s estate. She argued that...
Judge Subramanian rejected that effort at the time, finding that the balance of interests still favored protecting Jane Doe 3’s identity. He noted the highly sensitive nature of the allegations, the potential harm that disclosure could cause and the fact that Indyke and Kahn already knew who she was, limiting any prejudice to their ability to defend the case. At the same time, the judge warned that anonymity was not necessarily permanent and could be reconsidered if Doe became the representative of a certified class or if the case survived summary judgment and moved closer to trial. The ruling therefore allowed her to remain Jane Doe 3 while the litigation continued, but left open the possibility that the court could require public identification later in the case.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>676epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-state-of-idaho-and-their-confidence-in-the-case-against-kohberger-10-2-26--75489260
By the time Kohberger agreed to plead guilty in July 2025, prosecutors had additional evidence they believed reinforced that framework. They said his Hyundai had been cleaned so thoroughly after the murders that investigators found it unusually spotless, and they had evidence that he searched for the same type of knife and sheath on Amazon after the killings and later attempted to delete purchase information. Lead prosecutor Bill Thompson later said the DNA was the critical piece that transformed the investigation into a prosecutable case, while investigators maintained that the vehicle, cellphone records and other evidence were independently pointing toward Kohberger as well. The state still lacked a known motive and never recovered the murder weapon, but prosecutors believed the combination of DNA, digital evidence, surveillance, vehicle evidence and witness testimony gave them a case strong enough to take to a capital murder trial before Kohberger instead accepted four consecutive life sentences without parole.


to contact me

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75489260Fri, 02 Oct 2026 10:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciLeading up to Bryan Kohberger’s guilty plea, Idaho prosecutors believed they had assembled a strong circumstantial and forensic case tying him to the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. The centerpiece was DNA...
By the time Kohberger agreed to plead guilty in July 2025, prosecutors had additional evidence they believed reinforced that framework. They said his Hyundai had been cleaned so thoroughly after the murders that investigators found it unusually spotless, and they had evidence that he searched for the same type of knife and sheath on Amazon after the killings and later attempted to delete purchase information. Lead prosecutor Bill Thompson later said the DNA was the critical piece that transformed the investigation into a prosecutable case, while investigators maintained that the vehicle, cellphone records and other evidence were independently pointing toward Kohberger as well. The state still lacked a known motive and never recovered the murder weapon, but prosecutors believed the combination of DNA, digital evidence, surveillance, vehicle evidence and witness testimony gave them a case strong enough to take to a capital murder trial before Kohberger instead accepted four consecutive life sentences without parole.


to contact me

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2665epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-prosecutors-ask-to-examine-kohberger-s-mental-state-10-2-26--75489261
After Kohberger pleaded guilty, a separate fight erupted over the long-standing nondissemination order that had restricted attorneys, investigators and law-enforcement officials from publicly discussing the case. Media organizations asked the court to lift it, arguing that there was no longer a jury trial to protect, but Kohberger opposed that request and urged Hippler to keep the order in place through sentencing. His lawyers said continued restrictions were necessary to protect the integrity of the proceedings, reduce the media frenzy and safeguard the parties, victims’ families, court staff and attorneys. Hippler ultimately disagreed, ruling on July 17, 2025 that the guilty plea had largely eliminated the fair-trial justification for the gag order and that the public’s interest in information had become paramount, clearing the way for officials connected to the case to speak publicly.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75489261Fri, 02 Oct 2026 08:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIdaho prosecutors sought permission to have Bryan Kohberger examined by their own mental-health expert after the defense disclosed plans to use neuropsychological and psychiatric evidence during a potential penalty phase. The state argued that once...
After Kohberger pleaded guilty, a separate fight erupted over the long-standing nondissemination order that had restricted attorneys, investigators and law-enforcement officials from publicly discussing the case. Media organizations asked the court to lift it, arguing that there was no longer a jury trial to protect, but Kohberger opposed that request and urged Hippler to keep the order in place through sentencing. His lawyers said continued restrictions were necessary to protect the integrity of the proceedings, reduce the media frenzy and safeguard the parties, victims’ families, court staff and attorneys. Hippler ultimately disagreed, ruling on July 17, 2025 that the guilty plea had largely eliminated the fair-trial justification for the gag order and that the public’s interest in information had become paramount, clearing the way for officials connected to the case to speak publicly.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3028bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-buster-and-john-marvin-murdaugh-take-the-stand-during-the-trial-10-1-26--75437485
John Marvin Murdaugh, Alex’s brother, similarly testified that Alex was extraordinarily distraught after the killings and said he could hardly describe how devastated his brother appeared. He also gave emotional testimony about returning to the kennels the following morning and personally cleaning Paul’s remains from the scene because he felt he owed it to his nephew, calling it one of the hardest things he had ever done. John Marvin also described helping locate Maggie’s missing cellphone after Buster used the Find My iPhone feature to identify its location roughly half a mile from Moselle. Both men were called by the defense to humanize Alex and challenge the prosecution’s portrayal of his behavior after the murders, but their testimony also underscored just how closely the family became involved in the immediate aftermath of the crime.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75437485Fri, 02 Oct 2026 06:30:03 +0000Bobby CapucciBuster Murdaugh testified for the defense that his family had been close and that Alex appeared devastated after the murders of Maggie and Paul. He described the phone call in which his father told him they had been shot, saying Alex sounded strange...
John Marvin Murdaugh, Alex’s brother, similarly testified that Alex was extraordinarily distraught after the killings and said he could hardly describe how devastated his brother appeared. He also gave emotional testimony about returning to the kennels the following morning and personally cleaning Paul’s remains from the scene because he felt he owed it to his nephew, calling it one of the hardest things he had ever done. John Marvin also described helping locate Maggie’s missing cellphone after Buster used the Find My iPhone feature to identify its location roughly half a mile from Moselle. Both men were called by the defense to humanize Alex and challenge the prosecution’s portrayal of his behavior after the murders, but their testimony also underscored just how closely the family became involved in the immediate aftermath of the crime.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2910alexmurdaugh,breakingnews,breakingnewsreports,breakingnewsupdate,dailynews,dailynewsupdates,murdaugh,murdaughmurders,murdaughtrial,news,newsbreaks,newsbriefs,newscommentary,newsreport,newsupdate,newsupdates,southcarolina,truecrime,yourdailyupdate,yournewsyourworldtruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-the-order-appointing-a-lawyer-to-defend-bryan-kohberger--75487760
Taylor’s appointment became significant almost immediately because her office had previously represented relatives of some of the victims in unrelated criminal matters, including Xana Kernodle’s mother. Those connections prompted questions about a possible conflict of interest, but Taylor told the court that she had not personally advised the former client in question, and Kohberger later confirmed that he wanted her to remain his attorney after the issue was examined in a closed hearing. The court allowed the representation to continue, and Taylor went on to lead Kohberger’s defense through the years of pretrial litigation that followed.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75487760Fri, 02 Oct 2026 04:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciAfter Bryan Kohberger was charged in Idaho with four counts of first-degree murder and one count of burglary, the Latah County court appointed Anne Taylor to represent him as his public defender. Taylor was the chief public defender for Kootenai...
Taylor’s appointment became significant almost immediately because her office had previously represented relatives of some of the victims in unrelated criminal matters, including Xana Kernodle’s mother. Those connections prompted questions about a possible conflict of interest, but Taylor told the court that she had not personally advised the former client in question, and Kohberger later confirmed that he wanted her to remain his attorney after the issue was examined in a closed hearing. The court allowed the representation to continue, and Taylor went on to lead Kohberger’s defense through the years of pretrial litigation that followed.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>718bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-ethan-chapin-and-the-scholarship-named-after-him--75487759
Separately, Sigma Chi created the Ethan Chapin Memorial Scholarship Fund for members of the fraternity’s Gamma Eta chapter at the University of Idaho. The endowed scholarship awards $5,000 each year to the fraternity member who best reflects Ethan’s character, enthusiasm for life and the warmth he showed to people around him. Ethan’s triplet brother, Hunter Chapin, received the inaugural award in 2023, and the fund was built to continue in perpetuity. Together, the two scholarship efforts turned Ethan’s memory into something ongoing and tangible, providing financial help to students while keeping the focus on the kind of person his family and friends said he was, rather than solely on the way he died.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75487759Fri, 02 Oct 2026 02:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciAfter Ethan Chapin was killed in the University of Idaho murders, his family and fraternity created scholarships designed to keep his name and personality tied to opportunities for other students. The Chapin family established the Ethan’s Smile...
Separately, Sigma Chi created the Ethan Chapin Memorial Scholarship Fund for members of the fraternity’s Gamma Eta chapter at the University of Idaho. The endowed scholarship awards $5,000 each year to the fraternity member who best reflects Ethan’s character, enthusiasm for life and the warmth he showed to people around him. Ethan’s triplet brother, Hunter Chapin, received the inaugural award in 2023, and the fund was built to continue in perpetuity. Together, the two scholarship efforts turned Ethan’s memory into something ongoing and tangible, providing financial help to students while keeping the focus on the kind of person his family and friends said he was, rather than solely on the way he died.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>657bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcripts-day-2-part-18-9-30-26--75440529
The defense spent much of the day attacking how strongly the forensic evidence could actually be interpreted. FBI forensic examiner Amanda Bakker was questioned for roughly three hours as defense attorney Michael Burt dug into the technical details of the DNA testing, mixtures, statistical interpretation and the limitations of what the results could establish about when or how DNA was deposited on the objects. Robinson’s lawyers also pushed back against the State’s motive theory, challenging the attempt to characterize the killing as being driven by Kirk’s religious beliefs in addition to political disagreement. By the end of day two, prosecutors had added important physical evidence to the surveillance case presented on day one, but the defense had begun laying out the approach it would use throughout the hearing: concede that certain items contained Robinson-associated evidence while aggressively challenging what that evidence actually proved about possession, timing, motive and the circumstances of Kirk’s killing.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75440529Fri, 02 Oct 2026 00:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay two of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing focused heavily on prosecutors’ effort to connect Robinson to the Utah Valley University campus and to the physical evidence recovered after Charlie Kirk was shot. Investigators introduced additional...
The defense spent much of the day attacking how strongly the forensic evidence could actually be interpreted. FBI forensic examiner Amanda Bakker was questioned for roughly three hours as defense attorney Michael Burt dug into the technical details of the DNA testing, mixtures, statistical interpretation and the limitations of what the results could establish about when or how DNA was deposited on the objects. Robinson’s lawyers also pushed back against the State’s motive theory, challenging the attempt to characterize the killing as being driven by Kirk’s religious beliefs in addition to political disagreement. By the end of day two, prosecutors had added important physical evidence to the surveillance case presented on day one, but the defense had begun laying out the approach it would use throughout the hearing: concede that certain items contained Robinson-associated evidence while aggressively challenging what that evidence actually proved about possession, timing, motive and the circumstances of Kirk’s killing.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>826breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/judge-engelmayer-denies-ghislaine-maxwell-s-attempt-to-overturn-her-conviction-part-10-10-1-26--75463712
Engelmayer also found that much of the material Maxwell portrayed as exculpatory was either irrelevant or actually reinforced the case against her. He rejected all 10 principal claims in her petition, denied her request for an evidentiary hearing and refused additional discovery, concluding that she had failed to show any constitutional violation warranting relief. The court also declined to issue a certificate of appealability and certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith for purposes of proceeding without paying filing fees. The August 25, 2026 ruling therefore left Maxwell’s conviction and sentence fully intact while closing one of her remaining avenues for challenging the verdict in federal court.



to contacct me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75463712Thu, 01 Oct 2026 22:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJudge Paul Engelmayer rejected Ghislaine Maxwell’s attempt to overturn her conviction and 20-year prison sentence, dismantling the arguments she raised in a sprawling petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Maxwell claimed that newly released Epstein-related...
Engelmayer also found that much of the material Maxwell portrayed as exculpatory was either irrelevant or actually reinforced the case against her. He rejected all 10 principal claims in her petition, denied her request for an evidentiary hearing and refused additional discovery, concluding that she had failed to show any constitutional violation warranting relief. The court also declined to issue a certificate of appealability and certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith for purposes of proceeding without paying filing fees. The August 25, 2026 ruling therefore left Maxwell’s conviction and sentence fully intact while closing one of her remaining avenues for challenging the verdict in federal court.



to contacct me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>691epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/judge-engelmayer-denies-ghislaine-maxwell-s-attempt-to-overturn-her-conviction-part-9-10-1-26--75463716
Engelmayer also found that much of the material Maxwell portrayed as exculpatory was either irrelevant or actually reinforced the case against her. He rejected all 10 principal claims in her petition, denied her request for an evidentiary hearing and refused additional discovery, concluding that she had failed to show any constitutional violation warranting relief. The court also declined to issue a certificate of appealability and certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith for purposes of proceeding without paying filing fees. The August 25, 2026 ruling therefore left Maxwell’s conviction and sentence fully intact while closing one of her remaining avenues for challenging the verdict in federal court.



to contacct me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75463716Thu, 01 Oct 2026 20:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJudge Paul Engelmayer rejected Ghislaine Maxwell’s attempt to overturn her conviction and 20-year prison sentence, dismantling the arguments she raised in a sprawling petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Maxwell claimed that newly released Epstein-related...
Engelmayer also found that much of the material Maxwell portrayed as exculpatory was either irrelevant or actually reinforced the case against her. He rejected all 10 principal claims in her petition, denied her request for an evidentiary hearing and refused additional discovery, concluding that she had failed to show any constitutional violation warranting relief. The court also declined to issue a certificate of appealability and certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith for purposes of proceeding without paying filing fees. The August 25, 2026 ruling therefore left Maxwell’s conviction and sentence fully intact while closing one of her remaining avenues for challenging the verdict in federal court.



to contacct me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>656epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/kohberger-appealed-his-wsu-firing-days-before-his-arrest-10-1-26--75487513
Kohberger’s letter showed that, at least on paper, he was still planning to return to Pullman and continue his studies after the winter break. He wrote that losing the job would “virtually upend” his life and said he had grown attached to his classmates, professors and the WSU community. He never received a decision on the appeal before events overtook it: nine days after sending the letter, Kohberger was arrested in Pennsylvania and charged with murdering Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. That same day, WSU imposed an emergency suspension based on the murder and burglary charges, effectively ending any possibility that he would return to the university.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Bryan Kohberger Wrote Letter Begging For Job to Be Reinstated After Idaho Murders

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75487513Thu, 01 Oct 2026 18:30:05 +0000Bobby CapucciJust days before his arrest for the University of Idaho murders, Bryan Kohberger wrote Washington State University asking to be reinstated as a teaching assistant after the school terminated him from the position. Kohberger had been notified on...
Kohberger’s letter showed that, at least on paper, he was still planning to return to Pullman and continue his studies after the winter break. He wrote that losing the job would “virtually upend” his life and said he had grown attached to his classmates, professors and the WSU community. He never received a decision on the appeal before events overtook it: nine days after sending the letter, Kohberger was arrested in Pennsylvania and charged with murdering Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. That same day, WSU imposed an emergency suspension based on the murder and burglary charges, effectively ending any possibility that he would return to the university.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Bryan Kohberger Wrote Letter Begging For Job to Be Reinstated After Idaho Murders

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>696bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/norway-s-parliament-opens-hearings-into-jeffrey-epstein-s-political-connections-10-1-26--75463714
The hearings are part of a much broader reckoning in Norway, where several other prominent figures with Epstein ties are under police investigation on corruption allegations, including former prime minister Thorbjørn Jagland, former minister Terje Rød-Larsen and former diplomat Mona Juul. All three have denied criminal wrongdoing. Crown Princess Mette-Marit has also apologized for her friendship with Epstein, though she is not part of the parliamentary hearing. At the same time, parliament has created an external commission of academics and legal experts to examine more than 30 years of Norwegian diplomatic history and determine how these relationships developed, with the stated goal of restoring integrity and transparency in government institutions. The commission is expected to report its findings in early 2028.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Norway’s parliament probes Epstein links to politicians, diplomats

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75463714Thu, 01 Oct 2026 16:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciNorway’s parliament has opened public hearings into Jeffrey Epstein’s connections with Norwegian politicians and diplomats after newly released U.S. records exposed a wider web of relationships between Epstein and members of the country’s political...
The hearings are part of a much broader reckoning in Norway, where several other prominent figures with Epstein ties are under police investigation on corruption allegations, including former prime minister Thorbjørn Jagland, former minister Terje Rød-Larsen and former diplomat Mona Juul. All three have denied criminal wrongdoing. Crown Princess Mette-Marit has also apologized for her friendship with Epstein, though she is not part of the parliamentary hearing. At the same time, parliament has created an external commission of academics and legal experts to examine more than 30 years of Norwegian diplomatic history and determine how these relationships developed, with the stated goal of restoring integrity and transparency in government institutions. The commission is expected to report its findings in early 2028.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Norway’s parliament probes Epstein links to politicians, diplomats

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>651epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/federal-judge-allows-epstein-survivors-claims-against-firstbank-to-proceed-10-1-26--75463713

Rakoff also allowed a claim under New York City’s Gender-Motivated Violence Protection Act to move forward, although he dismissed a separate claim accusing FirstBank of obstructing enforcement of the federal trafficking law. FirstBank has denied the allegations and says it merely provided routine banking services without knowledge of Epstein’s trafficking operation. Molchonova is seeking to turn the case into a class action on behalf of women who say they were sexually abused or trafficked by Epstein or his associates, with a class-certification hearing scheduled for October 15. The ruling puts FirstBank alongside JPMorgan, Deutsche Bank and Bank of America as another major financial institution forced to defend its relationship with Epstein and explain why it continued doing business with him despite his criminal history and the warning signs surrounding his accounts.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

FirstBank Must Face Epstein Survivors’ Sex Trafficking Lawsuit, Judge Rules | Law Commentary

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75463713Thu, 01 Oct 2026 14:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciA federal judge in Manhattan ruled that FirstBank Puerto Rico and its parent company, First BanCorp, must face most of a lawsuit accusing the bank of helping sustain Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking operation for more than two decades. U.S. District...

Rakoff also allowed a claim under New York City’s Gender-Motivated Violence Protection Act to move forward, although he dismissed a separate claim accusing FirstBank of obstructing enforcement of the federal trafficking law. FirstBank has denied the allegations and says it merely provided routine banking services without knowledge of Epstein’s trafficking operation. Molchonova is seeking to turn the case into a class action on behalf of women who say they were sexually abused or trafficked by Epstein or his associates, with a class-certification hearing scheduled for October 15. The ruling puts FirstBank alongside JPMorgan, Deutsche Bank and Bank of America as another major financial institution forced to defend its relationship with Epstein and explain why it continued doing business with him despite his criminal history and the warning signs surrounding his accounts.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

FirstBank Must Face Epstein Survivors’ Sex Trafficking Lawsuit, Judge Rules | Law Commentary

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>696epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/university-of-maine-strips-george-mitchell-s-name-over-epstein-ties-10-1-26--75463711
The controversy went beyond simple association. Virginia Giuffre had previously alleged that Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell trafficked her to Mitchell while she was underage, an allegation Mitchell repeatedly denied, saying he never met Giuffre and had no knowledge of Epstein’s criminal conduct. Additional records later revealed a 2003 birthday-book message attributed to Mitchell describing his friendship with Epstein as one of the “blessings” in his life. Nearly three-quarters of people who submitted comments during the university’s review supported removing Mitchell’s name, and the University of Maine ultimately joined other institutions that had already begun distancing themselves from him, including Queen’s University Belfast and institutions in Maine.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Democrat suffers humiliating blow after his close relationship with Jeffrey Epstein was exposed | Daily Mail Online

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75463711Thu, 01 Oct 2026 12:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe University of Maine System voted to strip former U.S. Senate Majority Leader George Mitchell’s name from university programs and honors after renewed scrutiny of his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. The Board of Trustees voted 9-5, with one...
The controversy went beyond simple association. Virginia Giuffre had previously alleged that Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell trafficked her to Mitchell while she was underage, an allegation Mitchell repeatedly denied, saying he never met Giuffre and had no knowledge of Epstein’s criminal conduct. Additional records later revealed a 2003 birthday-book message attributed to Mitchell describing his friendship with Epstein as one of the “blessings” in his life. Nearly three-quarters of people who submitted comments during the university’s review supported removing Mitchell’s name, and the University of Maine ultimately joined other institutions that had already begun distancing themselves from him, including Queen’s University Belfast and institutions in Maine.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Democrat suffers humiliating blow after his close relationship with Jeffrey Epstein was exposed | Daily Mail Online

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>829epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-kaylee-goncalves-elan-financial-and-tiktok-warrants-10-1-26--75461275

The warrant served on Elan Financial Services focused instead on Kaylee’s financial records. Moscow police served the warrant on December 22, 2022, seeking records connected specifically to Kaylee Jade Goncalves as investigators examined transactions and account activity that could help reconstruct her movements, purchases or contacts before her death. Much of the underlying material was later sealed or redacted, so the public record did not disclose the full contents of what Elan produced or exactly what investigators hoped a particular transaction might establish. Taken together, the TikTok and Elan Financial warrants showed how broadly detectives were examining Kaylee’s life, looking not only at social-media activity but also at financial records in an effort to map out her final months and identify any connection, encounter or activity that might help explain what happened at the King Road house.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75461275Thu, 01 Oct 2026 10:30:03 +0000Bobby CapucciInvestigators obtained a warrant for TikTok records connected to Kaylee Goncalves as they worked to reconstruct the victims’ digital activity and determine whether Bryan Kohberger had interacted with any of them before the murders. The warrant sought...

The warrant served on Elan Financial Services focused instead on Kaylee’s financial records. Moscow police served the warrant on December 22, 2022, seeking records connected specifically to Kaylee Jade Goncalves as investigators examined transactions and account activity that could help reconstruct her movements, purchases or contacts before her death. Much of the underlying material was later sealed or redacted, so the public record did not disclose the full contents of what Elan produced or exactly what investigators hoped a particular transaction might establish. Taken together, the TikTok and Elan Financial warrants showed how broadly detectives were examining Kaylee’s life, looking not only at social-media activity but also at financial records in an effort to map out her final months and identify any connection, encounter or activity that might help explain what happened at the King Road house.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3081bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-what-happened-to-layla-santanello-10-1-26--75461274
Investigators now believe Santanello encountered a group of people after leaving the motel and that some of those individuals know what happened to her. Authorities have said they believe she is likely dead, but no one has been charged and no suspect has been publicly named. Her disappearance has remained unsolved despite searches, interviews and continued appeals for information, while her family has worked to keep attention on the case. More than three years later, the central mystery remains unchanged: what happened after Layla left the Americourt area, who she met, and why no one with knowledge of her final movements has provided the information needed to bring the case to a conclusion.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75461274Thu, 01 Oct 2026 08:30:03 +0000Bobby CapucciLayla Santanello disappeared from Kingsport, Tennessee, on June 27, 2023, after a series of troubling sightings around the Americourt Motel. Santanello, then 20 years old, had spent the previous night at the motel and was later seen barefoot, going...
Investigators now believe Santanello encountered a group of people after leaving the motel and that some of those individuals know what happened to her. Authorities have said they believe she is likely dead, but no one has been charged and no suspect has been publicly named. Her disappearance has remained unsolved despite searches, interviews and continued appeals for information, while her family has worked to keep attention on the case. More than three years later, the central mystery remains unchanged: what happened after Layla left the Americourt area, who she met, and why no one with knowledge of her final movements has provided the information needed to bring the case to a conclusion.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>4193coldcase,crime,crimeinvestigation,crimescene,killer,murder,murderer,serialkiller,serialkillers,truecrime,truecrimeaddict,truecrimecommunity,truecrimedocumentary,truecrimefan,truecrimehistory,truecrimejunkie,truecrimepodcast,truecrimepodcasts,truecrimestories,unsolvedmysteriestruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-melanie-gibb-and-her-testimony-from-the-lori-vallow-trial-10-1-26--75461273
Gibb also became central to the prosecution’s case because Lori falsely told police that JJ was staying with her after he had already disappeared. Gibb initially repeated part of that story, but later contacted investigators and secretly recorded a December 2019 phone call confronting Lori and Chad about where JJ really was. On the recording, Lori refused to reveal his location and insisted he was safe, while Chad suggested Gibb was being influenced by dark forces. Gibb told jurors that Alex Cox later made a disturbing comment suggesting she did not want to know what had happened to JJ. Her testimony tied the couple’s increasingly extreme beliefs directly to the deception surrounding the missing children and gave prosecutors a firsthand witness who had watched Lori and Chad’s ideology become more radical as people around them began dying.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75461273Thu, 01 Oct 2026 06:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciMelanie Gibb’s testimony gave jurors an inside look at the belief system Lori Vallow and Chad Daybell had built around themselves before the deaths of Tylee Ryan, JJ Vallow and Tammy Daybell. Gibb testified that Lori and Chad divided people into...
Gibb also became central to the prosecution’s case because Lori falsely told police that JJ was staying with her after he had already disappeared. Gibb initially repeated part of that story, but later contacted investigators and secretly recorded a December 2019 phone call confronting Lori and Chad about where JJ really was. On the recording, Lori refused to reveal his location and insisted he was safe, while Chad suggested Gibb was being influenced by dark forces. Gibb told jurors that Alex Cox later made a disturbing comment suggesting she did not want to know what had happened to JJ. Her testimony tied the couple’s increasingly extreme beliefs directly to the deception surrounding the missing children and gave prosecutors a firsthand witness who had watched Lori and Chad’s ideology become more radical as people around them began dying.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>4112chaddaybell,charlesvallow,crimenews,cultcrime,daybellcult,doomsdaymom,jjvallow,justicefortyleeandjj,loridaybell,lorivallow,lorivallowappeal,lorivallowdaybell,lorivallowtrial,mormoncult,mormontruecrime,tammydaybell,truecrime,truecrimecommunity,truecrimepodcast,tyleeryantruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-the-order-to-preserve-crime-scene-evidence-in-moscow--75460715
The order went beyond preserving the house itself. It required the state to retain all samples and evidence collected or generated during the investigation for the defense, specifically including bodily fluids, blood, tissue, notes, slides, photographs and other relevant material. The purpose was to ensure that evidence potentially important to Kohberger’s defense would not be destroyed, consumed or otherwise become unavailable before his lawyers had the opportunity to examine it. The order became particularly important because defense experts later conducted multiple visits to the King Road residence, photographing and creating detailed 3D laser scans of the interior before the house was ultimately demolished.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75460715Thu, 01 Oct 2026 04:30:03 +0000Bobby CapucciOn December 30, 2022, the court granted Bryan Kohberger’s request to preserve the crime scene at 1122 King Road and the physical evidence collected during the investigation. The order required the house, surrounding property, outbuildings, trailers,...
The order went beyond preserving the house itself. It required the state to retain all samples and evidence collected or generated during the investigation for the defense, specifically including bodily fluids, blood, tissue, notes, slides, photographs and other relevant material. The purpose was to ensure that evidence potentially important to Kohberger’s defense would not be destroyed, consumed or otherwise become unavailable before his lawyers had the opportunity to examine it. The order became particularly important because defense experts later conducted multiple visits to the King Road residence, photographing and creating detailed 3D laser scans of the interior before the house was ultimately demolished.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>669bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-bryan-kohberger-and-the-perfect-crime-theory--75460714
But the idea of a “perfect crime” ultimately ran into the reality that even a carefully planned scene can generate evidence in unexpected ways. Prosecutors pointed to DNA on the knife sheath, surveillance footage of a white Hyundai Elantra, cellphone records and other evidence they said connected Kohberger to the murders. The theory therefore became less about whether he actually created a perfect crime scene and more about whether he may have tried to outthink investigators and failed. If that was the intent, the case became an example of how one overlooked object, one digital trail or one surveillance camera can unravel even a crime that may have been planned with forensic awareness in mind.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75460714Thu, 01 Oct 2026 02:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciOne theory surrounding Bryan Kohberger was that his academic background in criminology may have influenced how he allegedly approached the King Road murders, with some commentators suggesting he tried to create what he believed would be a nearly...
But the idea of a “perfect crime” ultimately ran into the reality that even a carefully planned scene can generate evidence in unexpected ways. Prosecutors pointed to DNA on the knife sheath, surveillance footage of a white Hyundai Elantra, cellphone records and other evidence they said connected Kohberger to the murders. The theory therefore became less about whether he actually created a perfect crime scene and more about whether he may have tried to outthink investigators and failed. If that was the intent, the case became an example of how one overlooked object, one digital trail or one surveillance camera can unravel even a crime that may have been planned with forensic awareness in mind.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>624bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcripts-day-2-part-17-9-30-26--75440532
The defense spent much of the day attacking how strongly the forensic evidence could actually be interpreted. FBI forensic examiner Amanda Bakker was questioned for roughly three hours as defense attorney Michael Burt dug into the technical details of the DNA testing, mixtures, statistical interpretation and the limitations of what the results could establish about when or how DNA was deposited on the objects. Robinson’s lawyers also pushed back against the State’s motive theory, challenging the attempt to characterize the killing as being driven by Kirk’s religious beliefs in addition to political disagreement. By the end of day two, prosecutors had added important physical evidence to the surveillance case presented on day one, but the defense had begun laying out the approach it would use throughout the hearing: concede that certain items contained Robinson-associated evidence while aggressively challenging what that evidence actually proved about possession, timing, motive and the circumstances of Kirk’s killing.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75440532Thu, 01 Oct 2026 00:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay two of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing focused heavily on prosecutors’ effort to connect Robinson to the Utah Valley University campus and to the physical evidence recovered after Charlie Kirk was shot. Investigators introduced additional...
The defense spent much of the day attacking how strongly the forensic evidence could actually be interpreted. FBI forensic examiner Amanda Bakker was questioned for roughly three hours as defense attorney Michael Burt dug into the technical details of the DNA testing, mixtures, statistical interpretation and the limitations of what the results could establish about when or how DNA was deposited on the objects. Robinson’s lawyers also pushed back against the State’s motive theory, challenging the attempt to characterize the killing as being driven by Kirk’s religious beliefs in addition to political disagreement. By the end of day two, prosecutors had added important physical evidence to the surveillance case presented on day one, but the defense had begun laying out the approach it would use throughout the hearing: concede that certain items contained Robinson-associated evidence while aggressively challenging what that evidence actually proved about possession, timing, motive and the circumstances of Kirk’s killing.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>909breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/independent-report-details-security-failures-before-charlie-kirk-assassination-9-30-26--75440527
The review also found that Utah Valley University allowed Turning Point USA to control key decisions that directly affected security, including ticketing and the choice to keep the event outdoors even after concerns were raised about the venue. Because TPUSA handled registration, university officials reportedly lacked an accurate estimate of how large the crowd would become, and police did not request additional outside resources even after attendance swelled into the thousands. The report did not conclude that university officials acted maliciously or with willful disregard for safety, but it identified numerous shortcomings serious enough to produce nearly 150 recommendations for reform. Kirk’s family has since issued a wrongful-death notice against the university, alleging that reckless security decisions contributed to his death, while UVU President Jon Anderson has acknowledged the report’s findings and said the school has begun implementing changes.


to contact me:

bobbbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Charlie Kirk assassination report highlights several security failures at Utah Valley University

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75440527Wed, 30 Sep 2026 22:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciA 158-page independent review of the September 10, 2025 assassination of Charlie Kirk found significant security failures at Utah Valley University before and during the event. According to the report, the university did not conduct a formal security...
The review also found that Utah Valley University allowed Turning Point USA to control key decisions that directly affected security, including ticketing and the choice to keep the event outdoors even after concerns were raised about the venue. Because TPUSA handled registration, university officials reportedly lacked an accurate estimate of how large the crowd would become, and police did not request additional outside resources even after attendance swelled into the thousands. The report did not conclude that university officials acted maliciously or with willful disregard for safety, but it identified numerous shortcomings serious enough to produce nearly 150 recommendations for reform. Kirk’s family has since issued a wrongful-death notice against the university, alleging that reckless security decisions contributed to his death, while UVU President Jon Anderson has acknowledged the report’s findings and said the school has begun implementing changes.


to contact me:

bobbbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Charlie Kirk assassination report highlights several security failures at Utah Valley University

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>777breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/judge-engelmayer-denies-ghislaine-maxwell-s-attempt-to-overturn-her-conviction-part-8-9-30-26--75440530
Engelmayer also found that much of the material Maxwell portrayed as exculpatory was either irrelevant or actually reinforced the case against her. He rejected all 10 principal claims in her petition, denied her request for an evidentiary hearing and refused additional discovery, concluding that she had failed to show any constitutional violation warranting relief. The court also declined to issue a certificate of appealability and certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith for purposes of proceeding without paying filing fees. The August 25, 2026 ruling therefore left Maxwell’s conviction and sentence fully intact while closing one of her remaining avenues for challenging the verdict in federal court.



to contacct me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75440530Wed, 30 Sep 2026 20:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJudge Paul Engelmayer rejected Ghislaine Maxwell’s attempt to overturn her conviction and 20-year prison sentence, dismantling the arguments she raised in a sprawling petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Maxwell claimed that newly released Epstein-related...
Engelmayer also found that much of the material Maxwell portrayed as exculpatory was either irrelevant or actually reinforced the case against her. He rejected all 10 principal claims in her petition, denied her request for an evidentiary hearing and refused additional discovery, concluding that she had failed to show any constitutional violation warranting relief. The court also declined to issue a certificate of appealability and certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith for purposes of proceeding without paying filing fees. The August 25, 2026 ruling therefore left Maxwell’s conviction and sentence fully intact while closing one of her remaining avenues for challenging the verdict in federal court.



to contacct me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>893epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/judge-engelmayer-denies-ghislaine-maxwell-s-attempt-to-overturn-her-conviction-part-7-9-30-26--75440524
Engelmayer also found that much of the material Maxwell portrayed as exculpatory was either irrelevant or actually reinforced the case against her. He rejected all 10 principal claims in her petition, denied her request for an evidentiary hearing and refused additional discovery, concluding that she had failed to show any constitutional violation warranting relief. The court also declined to issue a certificate of appealability and certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith for purposes of proceeding without paying filing fees. The August 25, 2026 ruling therefore left Maxwell’s conviction and sentence fully intact while closing one of her remaining avenues for challenging the verdict in federal court.



to contacct me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75440524Wed, 30 Sep 2026 18:30:05 +0000Bobby CapucciJudge Paul Engelmayer rejected Ghislaine Maxwell’s attempt to overturn her conviction and 20-year prison sentence, dismantling the arguments she raised in a sprawling petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Maxwell claimed that newly released Epstein-related...
Engelmayer also found that much of the material Maxwell portrayed as exculpatory was either irrelevant or actually reinforced the case against her. He rejected all 10 principal claims in her petition, denied her request for an evidentiary hearing and refused additional discovery, concluding that she had failed to show any constitutional violation warranting relief. The court also declined to issue a certificate of appealability and certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith for purposes of proceeding without paying filing fees. The August 25, 2026 ruling therefore left Maxwell’s conviction and sentence fully intact while closing one of her remaining avenues for challenging the verdict in federal court.



to contacct me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>720epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/judge-engelmayer-denies-ghislaine-maxwell-s-attempt-to-overturn-her-conviction-part-6-9-30-26--75440525
Engelmayer also found that much of the material Maxwell portrayed as exculpatory was either irrelevant or actually reinforced the case against her. He rejected all 10 principal claims in her petition, denied her request for an evidentiary hearing and refused additional discovery, concluding that she had failed to show any constitutional violation warranting relief. The court also declined to issue a certificate of appealability and certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith for purposes of proceeding without paying filing fees. The August 25, 2026 ruling therefore left Maxwell’s conviction and sentence fully intact while closing one of her remaining avenues for challenging the verdict in federal court.



to contacct me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75440525Wed, 30 Sep 2026 16:30:03 +0000Bobby CapucciJudge Paul Engelmayer rejected Ghislaine Maxwell’s attempt to overturn her conviction and 20-year prison sentence, dismantling the arguments she raised in a sprawling petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Maxwell claimed that newly released Epstein-related...
Engelmayer also found that much of the material Maxwell portrayed as exculpatory was either irrelevant or actually reinforced the case against her. He rejected all 10 principal claims in her petition, denied her request for an evidentiary hearing and refused additional discovery, concluding that she had failed to show any constitutional violation warranting relief. The court also declined to issue a certificate of appealability and certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith for purposes of proceeding without paying filing fees. The August 25, 2026 ruling therefore left Maxwell’s conviction and sentence fully intact while closing one of her remaining avenues for challenging the verdict in federal court.



to contacct me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>690epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/sarah-ferguson-weighs-tell-all-book-on-prince-andrew-s-epstein-scandal-9-30-26--75440528
The memoir has not been formally announced, and no publication date or final deal has been confirmed, but the possibility has attracted attention because Ferguson has remained one of Andrew’s most visible defenders throughout his disgrace. A book touching directly on Epstein would inevitably draw scrutiny over what Ferguson knew, when she knew it and how she viewed Andrew’s continued relationship with Epstein after his 2008 conviction. It would also reopen questions about Ferguson’s own connection to Epstein, including the £15,000 payment he made toward one of her debts, which she later said she regretted accepting.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Sarah Ferguson 'Planning Memoir to Tackle Jeffrey Epstein Scandal'

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75440528Wed, 30 Sep 2026 14:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciSarah Ferguson is reportedly considering a new memoir that would address the fallout from Prince Andrew’s association with Jeffrey Epstein and the damage the scandal caused to their family. According to the report, Ferguson has discussed writing about...
The memoir has not been formally announced, and no publication date or final deal has been confirmed, but the possibility has attracted attention because Ferguson has remained one of Andrew’s most visible defenders throughout his disgrace. A book touching directly on Epstein would inevitably draw scrutiny over what Ferguson knew, when she knew it and how she viewed Andrew’s continued relationship with Epstein after his 2008 conviction. It would also reopen questions about Ferguson’s own connection to Epstein, including the £15,000 payment he made toward one of her debts, which she later said she regretted accepting.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Sarah Ferguson 'Planning Memoir to Tackle Jeffrey Epstein Scandal'

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>649epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/bill-gates-pressed-on-jeffrey-epstein-during-nbc-meet-the-press-appearance-9-30-26--75440526
The renewed questioning came after months of scrutiny over how extensive the relationship actually was. An external review commissioned by the Gates Foundation found roughly 30 meetings between Epstein and foundation leaders and staff, including Gates, between 2011 and 2014, even as employees raised concerns about Epstein’s criminal history. Gates has maintained that he never knew about any ongoing criminal activity and that he ultimately cut off contact after concluding Epstein could not deliver the philanthropic connections he had promised. The larger controversy has therefore centered not on an accusation that Gates participated in Epstein’s crimes, but on why he continued meeting with a convicted sex offender, how extensive those contacts were and why the relationship persisted despite warnings about Epstein’s past.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75440526Wed, 30 Sep 2026 12:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBill Gates again addressed his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein during a September 27 appearance on NBC’s Meet the Press, where he denied ever visiting Epstein’s private island and said his contact with Epstein consisted of roughly 10 meetings over a...
The renewed questioning came after months of scrutiny over how extensive the relationship actually was. An external review commissioned by the Gates Foundation found roughly 30 meetings between Epstein and foundation leaders and staff, including Gates, between 2011 and 2014, even as employees raised concerns about Epstein’s criminal history. Gates has maintained that he never knew about any ongoing criminal activity and that he ultimately cut off contact after concluding Epstein could not deliver the philanthropic connections he had promised. The larger controversy has therefore centered not on an accusation that Gates participated in Epstein’s crimes, but on why he continued meeting with a convicted sex offender, how extensive those contacts were and why the relationship persisted despite warnings about Epstein’s past.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>694epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-atlantic-city-serial-killer-9-31-26--75437484
The case has remained unsolved for nearly two decades despite multiple suspects and periodic attempts to revive the investigation. One man, Terry Oleson, drew intense scrutiny after police learned he had been staying at the Golden Key Motel and later found evidence that he had secretly recorded a minor, but he was never charged in connection with the four murders. Investigators also revisited the case after the arrest of accused Gilgo Beach killer Rex Heuermann because of similarities between the victims and the disposal sites, but authorities said they found no known connection. The identity of the Eastbound Strangler remains unknown, leaving the murders of Breidor, Dilts, Roberts and Raffo as one of New Jersey’s most haunting unsolved serial murder cases.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75437484Wed, 30 Sep 2026 10:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe so-called Atlantic City Serial Killer, also known as the Eastbound Strangler, is an unidentified killer believed to have murdered four women in the Atlantic City area in 2006. On November 20 of that year, the bodies of Barbara Breidor, Molly...
The case has remained unsolved for nearly two decades despite multiple suspects and periodic attempts to revive the investigation. One man, Terry Oleson, drew intense scrutiny after police learned he had been staying at the Golden Key Motel and later found evidence that he had secretly recorded a minor, but he was never charged in connection with the four murders. Investigators also revisited the case after the arrest of accused Gilgo Beach killer Rex Heuermann because of similarities between the victims and the disposal sites, but authorities said they found no known connection. The identity of the Eastbound Strangler remains unknown, leaving the murders of Breidor, Dilts, Roberts and Raffo as one of New Jersey’s most haunting unsolved serial murder cases.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2916breakingnewsdaily,crime,murder,murderino,mystery,newsreports,podcast,podcastersofinstagram,serialkiller,serialkillers,ssdgm,truecrime,truecrimeaddict,truecrimecommunity,truecrimefan,truecrimejunkie,truecrimeobsessed,truecrimepodcast,unsolved,unsolvedmysteriestruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-alex-murdaugh-and-the-hunt-for-a-new-trial-9-31-26--75437486
That was only the beginning of Murdaugh’s efforts to overturn the conviction. Months later, his attorneys filed a separate motion for a new trial based on allegations that Colleton County Clerk of Court Rebecca Hill had improperly influenced jurors by making comments about Murdaugh’s testimony and encouraging them to reach a quick verdict. After an evidentiary hearing, that effort was also denied, with the court finding that Hill had made inappropriate remarks but had not influenced the jury’s decision. Murdaugh’s legal team continued pursuing the issue on appeal, but his first attempt to undo the verdict had come within minutes of the conviction itself, and Judge Newman shut it down on the spot.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75437486Wed, 30 Sep 2026 08:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciImmediately after Alex Murdaugh was found guilty of murdering his wife, Maggie, and son, Paul, his attorneys asked Judge Clifton Newman to set aside the verdict and grant him a new trial. The defense argued that prosecutors had failed to prove the...
That was only the beginning of Murdaugh’s efforts to overturn the conviction. Months later, his attorneys filed a separate motion for a new trial based on allegations that Colleton County Clerk of Court Rebecca Hill had improperly influenced jurors by making comments about Murdaugh’s testimony and encouraging them to reach a quick verdict. After an evidentiary hearing, that effort was also denied, with the court finding that Hill had made inappropriate remarks but had not influenced the jury’s decision. Murdaugh’s legal team continued pursuing the issue on appeal, but his first attempt to undo the verdict had come within minutes of the conviction itself, and Judge Newman shut it down on the spot.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3114alexmurdaugh,breakingnews,breakingnewsreports,breakingnewsupdate,dailynews,dailynewsupdates,murdaugh,murdaughmurders,murdaughtrial,news,newsbreaks,newsbriefs,newscommentary,newsreport,newsupdate,newsupdates,southcarolina,truecrime,yourdailyupdate,yournewsyourworldtruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-the-battle-over-the-continuance-9-30-26--75437487

Judge Hippler ultimately sided with prosecutors and denied the continuance. In his June 26, 2025 order, he found that Kohberger had not shown good cause for postponing the trial or demonstrated that his substantial rights would be prejudiced if the case moved forward as scheduled. The ruling capped a long-running scheduling battle that had started much earlier, when Anne Taylor argued that a proposed March 2025 trial date was impossible because of the enormous amount of discovery, while prosecutors pushed for firm deadlines and resisted an open-ended delay. The fight reflected one of the central tensions throughout the pretrial process: the defense wanted more time to digest a massive capital case, while the state argued that the victims’ families and the public had already waited long enough.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75437487Wed, 30 Sep 2026 06:30:03 +0000Bobby CapucciBryan Kohberger’s defense and Idaho prosecutors spent months fighting over whether his capital murder trial should be delayed, with his attorneys repeatedly arguing that the sheer volume of discovery, unfinished mitigation work and intense publicity...

Judge Hippler ultimately sided with prosecutors and denied the continuance. In his June 26, 2025 order, he found that Kohberger had not shown good cause for postponing the trial or demonstrated that his substantial rights would be prejudiced if the case moved forward as scheduled. The ruling capped a long-running scheduling battle that had started much earlier, when Anne Taylor argued that a proposed March 2025 trial date was impossible because of the enormous amount of discovery, while prosecutors pushed for firm deadlines and resisted an open-ended delay. The fight reflected one of the central tensions throughout the pretrial process: the defense wanted more time to digest a massive capital case, while the state argued that the victims’ families and the public had already waited long enough.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2769bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-the-state-responds-to-a-flurry-of-kohberger-s-motions--75440309


(commercial at 9:13)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

051223 States Response to Defendants Third Supplemental Request for Discovery.pdf (idaho.gov)


source:

051223 States Response to Defendants Motion to Compel Discovery.pdf (idaho.gov)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75440309Wed, 30 Sep 2026 04:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn this epsisode we are diving right back into the court documents. This time we are taking a look at the state of Idaho's response to Bryan Kohberger and his newest demands. (commercial at 9:13) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com...


(commercial at 9:13)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

051223 States Response to Defendants Third Supplemental Request for Discovery.pdf (idaho.gov)


source:

051223 States Response to Defendants Motion to Compel Discovery.pdf (idaho.gov)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>732falsefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-bryan-kohberger-and-the-june-23-2023-hearing--75440308
The hearing also became notable because Judge John Judge addressed the extraordinary media attention surrounding the case. He clarified that the court’s nondissemination order applied to law enforcement as well as attorneys and warned camera operators not to focus excessively on Kohberger during proceedings, citing concerns about protecting his right to a fair trial. Several other motions that had been expected to come up were either resolved beforehand or postponed, so the hearing ended up centering largely on the discovery disputes and courtroom-media rules. The proceeding was actually held on June 27, 2023, though much of the reporting and follow-up coverage appeared on June 28.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75440308Wed, 30 Sep 2026 02:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciAt the late-June 2023 hearing in Bryan Kohberger’s case, his defense pressed prosecutors for additional discovery it said was necessary to evaluate the evidence used to identify and arrest him. Anne Taylor specifically sought more information about...
The hearing also became notable because Judge John Judge addressed the extraordinary media attention surrounding the case. He clarified that the court’s nondissemination order applied to law enforcement as well as attorneys and warned camera operators not to focus excessively on Kohberger during proceedings, citing concerns about protecting his right to a fair trial. Several other motions that had been expected to come up were either resolved beforehand or postponed, so the hearing ended up centering largely on the discovery disputes and courtroom-media rules. The proceeding was actually held on June 27, 2023, though much of the reporting and follow-up coverage appeared on June 28.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>704bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcripts-day-2-part-15-9-29-26--75418571
The defense spent much of the day attacking how strongly the forensic evidence could actually be interpreted. FBI forensic examiner Amanda Bakker was questioned for roughly three hours as defense attorney Michael Burt dug into the technical details of the DNA testing, mixtures, statistical interpretation and the limitations of what the results could establish about when or how DNA was deposited on the objects. Robinson’s lawyers also pushed back against the State’s motive theory, challenging the attempt to characterize the killing as being driven by Kirk’s religious beliefs in addition to political disagreement. By the end of day two, prosecutors had added important physical evidence to the surveillance case presented on day one, but the defense had begun laying out the approach it would use throughout the hearing: concede that certain items contained Robinson-associated evidence while aggressively challenging what that evidence actually proved about possession, timing, motive and the circumstances of Kirk’s killing.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75418571Wed, 30 Sep 2026 00:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay two of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing focused heavily on prosecutors’ effort to connect Robinson to the Utah Valley University campus and to the physical evidence recovered after Charlie Kirk was shot. Investigators introduced additional...
The defense spent much of the day attacking how strongly the forensic evidence could actually be interpreted. FBI forensic examiner Amanda Bakker was questioned for roughly three hours as defense attorney Michael Burt dug into the technical details of the DNA testing, mixtures, statistical interpretation and the limitations of what the results could establish about when or how DNA was deposited on the objects. Robinson’s lawyers also pushed back against the State’s motive theory, challenging the attempt to characterize the killing as being driven by Kirk’s religious beliefs in addition to political disagreement. By the end of day two, prosecutors had added important physical evidence to the surveillance case presented on day one, but the defense had begun laying out the approach it would use throughout the hearing: concede that certain items contained Robinson-associated evidence while aggressively challenging what that evidence actually proved about possession, timing, motive and the circumstances of Kirk’s killing.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>938epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/judge-engelmayer-denies-ghislaine-maxwell-s-attempt-to-overturn-her-conviction-part-5-9-29-26--75418567
Engelmayer also found that much of the material Maxwell portrayed as exculpatory was either irrelevant or actually reinforced the case against her. He rejected all 10 principal claims in her petition, denied her request for an evidentiary hearing and refused additional discovery, concluding that she had failed to show any constitutional violation warranting relief. The court also declined to issue a certificate of appealability and certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith for purposes of proceeding without paying filing fees. The August 25, 2026 ruling therefore left Maxwell’s conviction and sentence fully intact while closing one of her remaining avenues for challenging the verdict in federal court.



to contacct me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75418567Tue, 29 Sep 2026 22:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJudge Paul Engelmayer rejected Ghislaine Maxwell’s attempt to overturn her conviction and 20-year prison sentence, dismantling the arguments she raised in a sprawling petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Maxwell claimed that newly released Epstein-related...
Engelmayer also found that much of the material Maxwell portrayed as exculpatory was either irrelevant or actually reinforced the case against her. He rejected all 10 principal claims in her petition, denied her request for an evidentiary hearing and refused additional discovery, concluding that she had failed to show any constitutional violation warranting relief. The court also declined to issue a certificate of appealability and certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith for purposes of proceeding without paying filing fees. The August 25, 2026 ruling therefore left Maxwell’s conviction and sentence fully intact while closing one of her remaining avenues for challenging the verdict in federal court.



to contacct me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>727epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/judge-engelmayer-denies-ghislaine-maxwell-s-attempt-to-overturn-her-conviction-part-4-9-29-26--75418568
Engelmayer also found that much of the material Maxwell portrayed as exculpatory was either irrelevant or actually reinforced the case against her. He rejected all 10 principal claims in her petition, denied her request for an evidentiary hearing and refused additional discovery, concluding that she had failed to show any constitutional violation warranting relief. The court also declined to issue a certificate of appealability and certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith for purposes of proceeding without paying filing fees. The August 25, 2026 ruling therefore left Maxwell’s conviction and sentence fully intact while closing one of her remaining avenues for challenging the verdict in federal court.



to contacct me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75418568Tue, 29 Sep 2026 20:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJudge Paul Engelmayer rejected Ghislaine Maxwell’s attempt to overturn her conviction and 20-year prison sentence, dismantling the arguments she raised in a sprawling petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Maxwell claimed that newly released Epstein-related...
Engelmayer also found that much of the material Maxwell portrayed as exculpatory was either irrelevant or actually reinforced the case against her. He rejected all 10 principal claims in her petition, denied her request for an evidentiary hearing and refused additional discovery, concluding that she had failed to show any constitutional violation warranting relief. The court also declined to issue a certificate of appealability and certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith for purposes of proceeding without paying filing fees. The August 25, 2026 ruling therefore left Maxwell’s conviction and sentence fully intact while closing one of her remaining avenues for challenging the verdict in federal court.



to contacct me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>813epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/survivors-push-for-class-certification-in-epstein-csam-case-9-28-26--75418620
The push for class certification is central to the lawsuit because the survivors argue that the scope of Epstein’s image collection cannot realistically be addressed through isolated individual cases. The complaint also revisits failures from the original Palm Beach investigation, alleging that investigators never obtained access to computers believed to contain evidence and that the broader extent of Epstein’s collection was not uncovered until federal searches years later. The plaintiffs are seeking damages from Epstein’s estate, including at least $150,000 in liquidated damages for each class member under federal law, along with punitive damages and other relief. Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn are named only in their representative capacities as co-executors of the estate, and the lawsuit does not seek damages from them personally.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:


Epstein survivors sue estate over CSAM collection, cite Palm Beach investigation failures

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75418620Tue, 29 Sep 2026 18:36:52 +0000Bobby CapucciTwo anonymous Jeffrey Epstein survivors are asking a federal court to certify a class action on behalf of people whose images were allegedly acquired, produced, possessed or distributed as part of Epstein’s collection of child sexual abuse material....
The push for class certification is central to the lawsuit because the survivors argue that the scope of Epstein’s image collection cannot realistically be addressed through isolated individual cases. The complaint also revisits failures from the original Palm Beach investigation, alleging that investigators never obtained access to computers believed to contain evidence and that the broader extent of Epstein’s collection was not uncovered until federal searches years later. The plaintiffs are seeking damages from Epstein’s estate, including at least $150,000 in liquidated damages for each class member under federal law, along with punitive damages and other relief. Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn are named only in their representative capacities as co-executors of the estate, and the lawsuit does not seek damages from them personally.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:


Epstein survivors sue estate over CSAM collection, cite Palm Beach investigation failures

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>789epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-florida-science-foundation-at-the-center-of-the-indyke-and-kahn-investigation-9-29-26--75418572
The implications could extend directly to the non-prosecution agreement itself. The NPA conditioned its protections on Epstein complying with its terms and allowed the government to terminate the agreement and pursue further investigations or prosecutions if he materially breached it. Federal records have already shown that prosecutors discussed Epstein being in breach as early as 2008, but evidence that he was using a newly created foundation to facilitate continued abuse could provide a far more concrete basis for revisiting what those protections were actually worth. Such findings could also renew scrutiny of the immunity extended to potential co-conspirators and raise fresh questions about why federal authorities did not act more aggressively when concerns about Epstein’s compliance were already surfacing. What begins as an investigation into Indyke, Kahn and a little-known foundation could therefore develop into a much broader examination of whether Epstein violated the central bargain that protected him and others almost from the moment it was signed.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75418572Tue, 29 Sep 2026 16:45:02 +0000Bobby CapucciFederal investigators are reportedly examining the Florida Science Foundation as part of the broader scrutiny surrounding longtime Jeffrey Epstein associates Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, focusing on whether the organization was used as another...
The implications could extend directly to the non-prosecution agreement itself. The NPA conditioned its protections on Epstein complying with its terms and allowed the government to terminate the agreement and pursue further investigations or prosecutions if he materially breached it. Federal records have already shown that prosecutors discussed Epstein being in breach as early as 2008, but evidence that he was using a newly created foundation to facilitate continued abuse could provide a far more concrete basis for revisiting what those protections were actually worth. Such findings could also renew scrutiny of the immunity extended to potential co-conspirators and raise fresh questions about why federal authorities did not act more aggressively when concerns about Epstein’s compliance were already surfacing. What begins as an investigation into Indyke, Kahn and a little-known foundation could therefore develop into a much broader examination of whether Epstein violated the central bargain that protected him and others almost from the moment it was signed.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1114epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/attorney-warns-epstein-settlement-could-shut-out-future-survivors-9-29-26--75418569
Pate also argued that the New York settlement could undercut ongoing legal rights in the Virgin Islands, where Epstein’s estate is administered and where the law allows claims, including punitive damages, to survive a defendant’s death. He maintained that survivors who later came forward should not be forced to give up the ability to sue the estate in the Virgin Islands simply because of a settlement negotiated elsewhere. His central objection was that the agreement would provide sweeping protection to the estate while potentially shutting out women who had not yet come forward, creating what he described as a due-process problem. Pate urged the court to modify the settlement so future survivors could still pursue claims and so more of the estate’s remaining assets would be preserved for victims rather than distributed to heirs or others connected to Epstein.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


V.I. Attorney Objects to Broad Epstein Settlement | St. Thomas Source

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75418569Tue, 29 Sep 2026 14:53:31 +0000Bobby CapucciA St. Croix attorney, Russell Pate, objected to a proposed class-action settlement that would resolve sexual assault and trafficking claims against Jeffrey Epstein’s estate and sharply limit future lawsuits tied to Epstein’s crimes. The proposed deal...
Pate also argued that the New York settlement could undercut ongoing legal rights in the Virgin Islands, where Epstein’s estate is administered and where the law allows claims, including punitive damages, to survive a defendant’s death. He maintained that survivors who later came forward should not be forced to give up the ability to sue the estate in the Virgin Islands simply because of a settlement negotiated elsewhere. His central objection was that the agreement would provide sweeping protection to the estate while potentially shutting out women who had not yet come forward, creating what he described as a due-process problem. Pate urged the court to modify the settlement so future survivors could still pursue claims and so more of the estate’s remaining assets would be preserved for victims rather than distributed to heirs or others connected to Epstein.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


V.I. Attorney Objects to Broad Epstein Settlement | St. Thomas Source

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>883epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-moscow-pd-and-their-press-releases-the-week-of-november-20th-2022-9-29-26--75414250
At the November 23 press conference, authorities again emphasized that they had no named suspect while describing the increasingly large investigation underway. Police said they had collected 103 pieces of evidence, taken roughly 4,000 photographs, created three-dimensional scans of the King Road house and devoted hundreds of hours to forensic processing. They also said they had been unable to substantiate reports that Kaylee had a stalker, cleared the man she and Madison repeatedly tried to call shortly before the murders and continued asking the public for video, tips and other information. By November 27, police reported that more than 488 digital-media submissions had been sent to investigators and acknowledged the growing fear in Moscow, with calls about unusual activity and welfare checks rising sharply. The week of briefings showed an investigation expanding rapidly in manpower and evidence collection, but still without the central answers the public wanted most: who committed the murders, what the motive was and where the killer had gone.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75414250Tue, 29 Sep 2026 10:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDuring the week of November 20 through November 27, 2022, Moscow police held two major press conferences while also issuing daily updates as investigators worked to determine who killed Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin....
At the November 23 press conference, authorities again emphasized that they had no named suspect while describing the increasingly large investigation underway. Police said they had collected 103 pieces of evidence, taken roughly 4,000 photographs, created three-dimensional scans of the King Road house and devoted hundreds of hours to forensic processing. They also said they had been unable to substantiate reports that Kaylee had a stalker, cleared the man she and Madison repeatedly tried to call shortly before the murders and continued asking the public for video, tips and other information. By November 27, police reported that more than 488 digital-media submissions had been sent to investigators and acknowledged the growing fear in Moscow, with calls about unusual activity and welfare checks rising sharply. The week of briefings showed an investigation expanding rapidly in manpower and evidence collection, but still without the central answers the public wanted most: who committed the murders, what the motive was and where the killer had gone.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1906bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-brian-laundrie-and-his-gabby-petito-confession-9-29-26--75414251

Gabby’s mother, Nichole Schmidt, reacted angrily to the confession and rejected Laundrie’s attempt to explain the killing on his own terms. She described the note as narcissistic and shared a message saying that narcissists rewrite history to avoid accountability, while also making clear that the family would continue pursuing the truth and justice for Gabby. For Schmidt, the confession did not provide closure so much as another attempt by Laundrie to control the story after killing her daughter. She and the rest of Gabby’s family continued to challenge the version of events he left behind and to pursue legal accountability connected to what happened before and after Gabby’s death.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75414251Tue, 29 Sep 2026 08:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBrian Laundrie confessed in a notebook recovered near his remains that he had killed Gabby Petito. In the handwritten note, Laundrie claimed that Petito had been badly injured after a fall near a creek in Wyoming and that he killed her because he...

Gabby’s mother, Nichole Schmidt, reacted angrily to the confession and rejected Laundrie’s attempt to explain the killing on his own terms. She described the note as narcissistic and shared a message saying that narcissists rewrite history to avoid accountability, while also making clear that the family would continue pursuing the truth and justice for Gabby. For Schmidt, the confession did not provide closure so much as another attempt by Laundrie to control the story after killing her daughter. She and the rest of Gabby’s family continued to challenge the version of events he left behind and to pursue legal accountability connected to what happened before and after Gabby’s death.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2636brianlaundrie,coldcasecommunity,crimeinvestigation,crimenews,domesticviolenceawareness,gabbypetito,gabbypetitocase,gabbypetitostory,homicidecase,justiceforgabby,justiceforvictims,missingpersons,remembergabby,truecrime,truecrimecommunity,truecrimedocumentary,truecrimenews,truecrimepodcast,truecrimestories,victimadvocacytruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-how-alex-murdaugh-s-own-words-helped-sink-him-9-28-26--75414252

His testimony also opened the door for prosecutors to confront him directly with his broader history of dishonesty and financial crimes, allowing them to portray the kennel lie as part of a much larger pattern rather than an isolated mistake. During cross-examination, Murdaugh repeatedly had to concede that he had manipulated clients, stolen money and lied to people who trusted him, while still asking jurors to believe his account of the murders. Instead of neutralizing the prosecution’s case, his testimony reinforced its central theme that Murdaugh was willing to lie when the truth threatened him. By admitting he had been at the scene and then trying to explain away months of deception, Murdaugh effectively gave jurors a firsthand demonstration of the credibility problem prosecutors had spent the trial building.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75414252Tue, 29 Sep 2026 06:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciAlex Murdaugh’s decision to testify became one of the most damaging moments of his murder trial because it forced him to admit that he had lied repeatedly about a critical piece of evidence. For months, Murdaugh had maintained that he was not at the...

His testimony also opened the door for prosecutors to confront him directly with his broader history of dishonesty and financial crimes, allowing them to portray the kennel lie as part of a much larger pattern rather than an isolated mistake. During cross-examination, Murdaugh repeatedly had to concede that he had manipulated clients, stolen money and lied to people who trusted him, while still asking jurors to believe his account of the murders. Instead of neutralizing the prosecution’s case, his testimony reinforced its central theme that Murdaugh was willing to lie when the truth threatened him. By admitting he had been at the scene and then trying to explain away months of deception, Murdaugh effectively gave jurors a firsthand demonstration of the credibility problem prosecutors had spent the trial building.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2960alexmurdaugh,breakingnews,breakingnewsreports,breakingnewsupdate,dailynews,dailynewsupdates,murdaugh,murdaughmurders,murdaughtrial,news,newsbreaks,newsbriefs,newscommentary,newsreport,newsupdate,newsupdates,southcarolina,truecrime,yourdailyupdate,yournewsyourworldtruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-bryan-kohberger-objects-to-the-discovery-related-protective-order--75414830

Prosecutors defended the protective order as necessary because the case involved sensitive evidence, private information and intense media attention. They argued that restrictions were needed to protect the integrity of the investigation, the privacy of witnesses and victims’ families, and Kohberger’s own right to a fair trial. The dispute became part of the broader fight over secrecy in the case, with the defense pushing for greater access and flexibility while the state sought tighter control over how discovery material circulated outside the courtroom.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75414830Tue, 29 Sep 2026 04:30:04 +0000Bobby CapucciBryan Kohberger’s defense objected to the protective order governing discovery in the Moscow murders case, arguing that the restrictions were too broad and interfered with his ability to prepare a defense. His attorneys challenged limits on how...

Prosecutors defended the protective order as necessary because the case involved sensitive evidence, private information and intense media attention. They argued that restrictions were needed to protect the integrity of the investigation, the privacy of witnesses and victims’ families, and Kohberger’s own right to a fair trial. The dispute became part of the broader fight over secrecy in the case, with the defense pushing for greater access and flexibility while the state sought tighter control over how discovery material circulated outside the courtroom.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>885bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-bryan-kohberger-s-aunt-speaks-out-in-the-wake-of-his-arrest--75414829
he also expressed concern about what might happen to Kohberger if he were convicted and sentenced to spend the rest of his life in prison. His aunt said she feared he might attempt suicide if faced with that outcome, while making clear that her sympathy also extended to the families of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. Her comments stood out because Kohberger’s immediate family had said very little publicly after his December 2022 arrest, making the aunt one of the first relatives to speak openly about what she remembered of him and how she viewed the accusations. At the time, her remarks reflected both disbelief at the scale of the allegations and an acknowledgment that she thought prosecutors might ultimately prove their case.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75414829Tue, 29 Sep 2026 02:30:04 +0000Bobby CapucciBryan Kohberger’s aunt, who lived in Las Vegas and spoke anonymously after his arrest, said she had known him as a quiet, withdrawn young man and had never personally seen violence from him. She said the allegations shocked her, but she also believed...
he also expressed concern about what might happen to Kohberger if he were convicted and sentenced to spend the rest of his life in prison. His aunt said she feared he might attempt suicide if faced with that outcome, while making clear that her sympathy also extended to the families of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. Her comments stood out because Kohberger’s immediate family had said very little publicly after his December 2022 arrest, making the aunt one of the first relatives to speak openly about what she remembered of him and how she viewed the accusations. At the time, her remarks reflected both disbelief at the scale of the allegations and an acknowledgment that she thought prosecutors might ultimately prove their case.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>686bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcripts-day-2-part-14-9-28-26--75413076
The defense spent much of the day attacking how strongly the forensic evidence could actually be interpreted. FBI forensic examiner Amanda Bakker was questioned for roughly three hours as defense attorney Michael Burt dug into the technical details of the DNA testing, mixtures, statistical interpretation and the limitations of what the results could establish about when or how DNA was deposited on the objects. Robinson’s lawyers also pushed back against the State’s motive theory, challenging the attempt to characterize the killing as being driven by Kirk’s religious beliefs in addition to political disagreement. By the end of day two, prosecutors had added important physical evidence to the surveillance case presented on day one, but the defense had begun laying out the approach it would use throughout the hearing: concede that certain items contained Robinson-associated evidence while aggressively challenging what that evidence actually proved about possession, timing, motive and the circumstances of Kirk’s killing.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75413076Tue, 29 Sep 2026 00:30:03 +0000Bobby CapucciDay two of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing focused heavily on prosecutors’ effort to connect Robinson to the Utah Valley University campus and to the physical evidence recovered after Charlie Kirk was shot. Investigators introduced additional...
The defense spent much of the day attacking how strongly the forensic evidence could actually be interpreted. FBI forensic examiner Amanda Bakker was questioned for roughly three hours as defense attorney Michael Burt dug into the technical details of the DNA testing, mixtures, statistical interpretation and the limitations of what the results could establish about when or how DNA was deposited on the objects. Robinson’s lawyers also pushed back against the State’s motive theory, challenging the attempt to characterize the killing as being driven by Kirk’s religious beliefs in addition to political disagreement. By the end of day two, prosecutors had added important physical evidence to the surveillance case presented on day one, but the defense had begun laying out the approach it would use throughout the hearing: concede that certain items contained Robinson-associated evidence while aggressively challenging what that evidence actually proved about possession, timing, motive and the circumstances of Kirk’s killing.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>856breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/judge-engelmayer-denies-ghislaine-maxwell-s-attempt-to-overturn-her-conviction-part-3-9-28-26--75413069
Engelmayer also found that much of the material Maxwell portrayed as exculpatory was either irrelevant or actually reinforced the case against her. He rejected all 10 principal claims in her petition, denied her request for an evidentiary hearing and refused additional discovery, concluding that she had failed to show any constitutional violation warranting relief. The court also declined to issue a certificate of appealability and certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith for purposes of proceeding without paying filing fees. The August 25, 2026 ruling therefore left Maxwell’s conviction and sentence fully intact while closing one of her remaining avenues for challenging the verdict in federal court.



to contacct me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75413069Mon, 28 Sep 2026 22:30:06 +0000Bobby CapucciJudge Paul Engelmayer rejected Ghislaine Maxwell’s attempt to overturn her conviction and 20-year prison sentence, dismantling the arguments she raised in a sprawling petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Maxwell claimed that newly released Epstein-related...
Engelmayer also found that much of the material Maxwell portrayed as exculpatory was either irrelevant or actually reinforced the case against her. He rejected all 10 principal claims in her petition, denied her request for an evidentiary hearing and refused additional discovery, concluding that she had failed to show any constitutional violation warranting relief. The court also declined to issue a certificate of appealability and certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith for purposes of proceeding without paying filing fees. The August 25, 2026 ruling therefore left Maxwell’s conviction and sentence fully intact while closing one of her remaining avenues for challenging the verdict in federal court.



to contacct me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>640epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/judge-engelmayer-denies-ghislaine-maxwell-s-attempt-to-overturn-her-conviction-part-2-9-28-26--75413068
Engelmayer also found that much of the material Maxwell portrayed as exculpatory was either irrelevant or actually reinforced the case against her. He rejected all 10 principal claims in her petition, denied her request for an evidentiary hearing and refused additional discovery, concluding that she had failed to show any constitutional violation warranting relief. The court also declined to issue a certificate of appealability and certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith for purposes of proceeding without paying filing fees. The August 25, 2026 ruling therefore left Maxwell’s conviction and sentence fully intact while closing one of her remaining avenues for challenging the verdict in federal court.



to contacct me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75413068Mon, 28 Sep 2026 20:30:03 +0000Bobby CapucciJudge Paul Engelmayer rejected Ghislaine Maxwell’s attempt to overturn her conviction and 20-year prison sentence, dismantling the arguments she raised in a sprawling petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Maxwell claimed that newly released Epstein-related...
Engelmayer also found that much of the material Maxwell portrayed as exculpatory was either irrelevant or actually reinforced the case against her. He rejected all 10 principal claims in her petition, denied her request for an evidentiary hearing and refused additional discovery, concluding that she had failed to show any constitutional violation warranting relief. The court also declined to issue a certificate of appealability and certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith for purposes of proceeding without paying filing fees. The August 25, 2026 ruling therefore left Maxwell’s conviction and sentence fully intact while closing one of her remaining avenues for challenging the verdict in federal court.



to contacct me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>862epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/judge-engelmayer-denies-ghislaine-maxwell-s-attempt-to-overturn-her-conviction-part-1-9-28-26--75413067
Engelmayer also found that much of the material Maxwell portrayed as exculpatory was either irrelevant or actually reinforced the case against her. He rejected all 10 principal claims in her petition, denied her request for an evidentiary hearing and refused additional discovery, concluding that she had failed to show any constitutional violation warranting relief. The court also declined to issue a certificate of appealability and certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith for purposes of proceeding without paying filing fees. The August 25, 2026 ruling therefore left Maxwell’s conviction and sentence fully intact while closing one of her remaining avenues for challenging the verdict in federal court.



to contacct me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75413067Mon, 28 Sep 2026 18:30:06 +0000Bobby CapucciJudge Paul Engelmayer rejected Ghislaine Maxwell’s attempt to overturn her conviction and 20-year prison sentence, dismantling the arguments she raised in a sprawling petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Maxwell claimed that newly released Epstein-related...
Engelmayer also found that much of the material Maxwell portrayed as exculpatory was either irrelevant or actually reinforced the case against her. He rejected all 10 principal claims in her petition, denied her request for an evidentiary hearing and refused additional discovery, concluding that she had failed to show any constitutional violation warranting relief. The court also declined to issue a certificate of appealability and certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith for purposes of proceeding without paying filing fees. The August 25, 2026 ruling therefore left Maxwell’s conviction and sentence fully intact while closing one of her remaining avenues for challenging the verdict in federal court.



to contacct me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>765epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/what-an-investigation-into-darren-indyke-and-richard-kahn-might-look-like-part-2-9-28-26--75409347
Such an investigation would go far beyond simply identifying Epstein’s wealth. Forensic accountants could follow incoming payments from wealthy clients, trace outgoing wires to employees and associates, examine intercompany loans, analyze foreign transactions and compare financial records with tax filings and corporate representations. Indyke’s authority over certain financial transactions and Kahn’s role in accounting and tax administration would make their records especially important in determining who knew what about specific transfers and how those transfers were characterized. None of that, by itself, establishes criminal wrongdoing, but it explains why both men would be unavoidable figures in a serious examination of Epstein’s money machine. If investigators truly follow the financial trail without artificial limits, the result could be the most detailed reconstruction yet of how Epstein’s network operated financially and whether the complicated web of shell companies and accounts served purposes beyond ordinary wealth management.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75409347Mon, 28 Sep 2026 16:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciA potential investigation into Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn could focus on the network of companies, trusts and accounts that formed the financial backbone of Jeffrey Epstein’s operation, with investigators tracing where money came from, how it...
Such an investigation would go far beyond simply identifying Epstein’s wealth. Forensic accountants could follow incoming payments from wealthy clients, trace outgoing wires to employees and associates, examine intercompany loans, analyze foreign transactions and compare financial records with tax filings and corporate representations. Indyke’s authority over certain financial transactions and Kahn’s role in accounting and tax administration would make their records especially important in determining who knew what about specific transfers and how those transfers were characterized. None of that, by itself, establishes criminal wrongdoing, but it explains why both men would be unavoidable figures in a serious examination of Epstein’s money machine. If investigators truly follow the financial trail without artificial limits, the result could be the most detailed reconstruction yet of how Epstein’s network operated financially and whether the complicated web of shell companies and accounts served purposes beyond ordinary wealth management.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1330epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/what-an-investigation-into-darren-indyke-and-richard-kahn-might-look-like-part-1-9-28-26--75409348
Such an investigation would go far beyond simply identifying Epstein’s wealth. Forensic accountants could follow incoming payments from wealthy clients, trace outgoing wires to employees and associates, examine intercompany loans, analyze foreign transactions and compare financial records with tax filings and corporate representations. Indyke’s authority over certain financial transactions and Kahn’s role in accounting and tax administration would make their records especially important in determining who knew what about specific transfers and how those transfers were characterized. None of that, by itself, establishes criminal wrongdoing, but it explains why both men would be unavoidable figures in a serious examination of Epstein’s money machine. If investigators truly follow the financial trail without artificial limits, the result could be the most detailed reconstruction yet of how Epstein’s network operated financially and whether the complicated web of shell companies and accounts served purposes beyond ordinary wealth management.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75409348Mon, 28 Sep 2026 14:27:14 +0000Bobby CapucciA potential investigation into Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn could focus on the network of companies, trusts and accounts that formed the financial backbone of Jeffrey Epstein’s operation, with investigators tracing where money came from, how it...
Such an investigation would go far beyond simply identifying Epstein’s wealth. Forensic accountants could follow incoming payments from wealthy clients, trace outgoing wires to employees and associates, examine intercompany loans, analyze foreign transactions and compare financial records with tax filings and corporate representations. Indyke’s authority over certain financial transactions and Kahn’s role in accounting and tax administration would make their records especially important in determining who knew what about specific transfers and how those transfers were characterized. None of that, by itself, establishes criminal wrongdoing, but it explains why both men would be unavoidable figures in a serious examination of Epstein’s money machine. If investigators truly follow the financial trail without artificial limits, the result could be the most detailed reconstruction yet of how Epstein’s network operated financially and whether the complicated web of shell companies and accounts served purposes beyond ordinary wealth management.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>874epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/judge-sullivan-denies-doj-stay-request-in-epstein-files-fight-9-28-26--75409346
Sullivan went further, making clear that even if the procedural violation were ignored, he would still deny the government’s request on the merits for the reasons laid out in his earlier preliminary-injunction ruling. At the same time, the judge temporarily paused the specific September 24 deadline requiring the government to begin the foreign-language review, giving Blanche an opportunity to seek a stay directly from the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. Once the appeals court rules on that forthcoming request, both sides must file a joint notice within three days recommending how the case should proceed. The result was therefore a loss for the government at the district-court level, but with a short temporary reprieve while it takes the dispute to the appeals court.


to contat me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.291779.49.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75409346Mon, 28 Sep 2026 12:30:04 +0000Bobby CapucciJudge Emmet Sullivan denied the Justice Department’s request for a partial stay of his September 16 order requiring Todd Blanche, in his official capacity as acting attorney general, to begin reviewing and producing foreign-language materials that...
Sullivan went further, making clear that even if the procedural violation were ignored, he would still deny the government’s request on the merits for the reasons laid out in his earlier preliminary-injunction ruling. At the same time, the judge temporarily paused the specific September 24 deadline requiring the government to begin the foreign-language review, giving Blanche an opportunity to seek a stay directly from the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. Once the appeals court rules on that forthcoming request, both sides must file a joint notice within three days recommending how the case should proceed. The result was therefore a loss for the government at the district-court level, but with a short temporary reprieve while it takes the dispute to the appeals court.


to contat me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.291779.49.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>737epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-the-sentencing-hearing-9-28-26--75398305
There was also intense speculation over whether Kohberger himself would speak and finally explain what happened inside the King Road house. Because the sentence had already been negotiated, legal analysts noted that he had little incentive to say anything, and he was under no obligation to provide a motive or detailed confession. That left the sentencing poised to be less about determining punishment and more about giving the victims’ families a public forum to describe their loss, confront the man who had admitted killing their loved ones and put their own words into the permanent court record. Expectations were high that the hearing might provide some measure of closure, but there was also a very real possibility that Kohberger would offer no explanation at all.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75398305Mon, 28 Sep 2026 10:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBefore Bryan Kohberger was sentenced on July 23, 2025, the outcome itself was largely predetermined by the plea agreement he had reached with prosecutors. Kohberger had pleaded guilty to four counts of first-degree murder and one count of burglary,...
There was also intense speculation over whether Kohberger himself would speak and finally explain what happened inside the King Road house. Because the sentence had already been negotiated, legal analysts noted that he had little incentive to say anything, and he was under no obligation to provide a motive or detailed confession. That left the sentencing poised to be less about determining punishment and more about giving the victims’ families a public forum to describe their loss, confront the man who had admitted killing their loved ones and put their own words into the permanent court record. Expectations were high that the hearing might provide some measure of closure, but there was also a very real possibility that Kohberger would offer no explanation at all.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2076bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-microsoft-and-potlatch-no-1-warrants-9-28-26--75398304
Investigators also served a warrant on Potlatch No. 1 Financial Credit Union, now known as P1FCU, as part of a much wider effort to examine financial records connected to the investigation. The Potlatch warrant was one of numerous warrants issued to banks and financial institutions as detectives looked for transactions, account activity or other records that might help establish movements, purchases or other relevant behavior. Court records show that the Potlatch warrant was returned in December 2022, but much of the substantive information remained sealed or redacted because the court found the records contained highly private information and because of concerns about protecting Kohberger’s right to a fair trial. Taken together, the Microsoft and Potlatch warrants showed investigators examining both Kohberger’s digital footprint and financial activity as they built out the broader evidentiary record.


contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75398304Mon, 28 Sep 2026 08:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciInvestigators in the Bryan Kohberger case obtained a search warrant for Microsoft seeking user data tied to several accounts and identifiers associated with him, including email addresses, a phone number and university-linked accounts. The warrant...
Investigators also served a warrant on Potlatch No. 1 Financial Credit Union, now known as P1FCU, as part of a much wider effort to examine financial records connected to the investigation. The Potlatch warrant was one of numerous warrants issued to banks and financial institutions as detectives looked for transactions, account activity or other records that might help establish movements, purchases or other relevant behavior. Court records show that the Potlatch warrant was returned in December 2022, but much of the substantive information remained sealed or redacted because the court found the records contained highly private information and because of concerns about protecting Kohberger’s right to a fair trial. Taken together, the Microsoft and Potlatch warrants showed investigators examining both Kohberger’s digital footprint and financial activity as they built out the broader evidentiary record.


contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3034bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-the-2019-grand-jury-9-28-26--75398306
The transcripts have now been newly unsealed under the Epstein Transparency Act, a move that has reignited scrutiny over what federal authorities knew—and when. Their release sheds light on investigative decisions, evidentiary thresholds, and the scope of information presented to the grand jury, while also highlighting gaps that critics argue point to earlier prosecutorial failures. Survivors and transparency advocates have emphasized that the unsealing is significant not only for what it reveals about Epstein’s conduct, but for what it exposes about institutional hesitation, delayed accountability, and the broader protection mechanisms that allowed Epstein to evade federal charges for years. While redactions remain, the disclosure represents a rare window into the mechanics of a case that many believe should have been brought long before 2019.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

EFTA00008529.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75398306Mon, 28 Sep 2026 06:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe 2019 New York federal grand jury transcripts capture the final prosecutorial push that led to the arrest of Jeffrey Epstein on sex-trafficking charges in the Southern District of New York. The transcripts reflect prosecutors laying out a sweeping...
The transcripts have now been newly unsealed under the Epstein Transparency Act, a move that has reignited scrutiny over what federal authorities knew—and when. Their release sheds light on investigative decisions, evidentiary thresholds, and the scope of information presented to the grand jury, while also highlighting gaps that critics argue point to earlier prosecutorial failures. Survivors and transparency advocates have emphasized that the unsealing is significant not only for what it reveals about Epstein’s conduct, but for what it exposes about institutional hesitation, delayed accountability, and the broader protection mechanisms that allowed Epstein to evade federal charges for years. While redactions remain, the disclosure represents a rare window into the mechanics of a case that many believe should have been brought long before 2019.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

EFTA00008529.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3450epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-the-goncalves-family-and-their-interview-with-48-hours-9-27-26--75398183
The interview also focused heavily on Kaylee herself and the family’s continuing grief. Steve Goncalves described his daughter as driven, competitive and someone who had plans for her future, including a job lined up after graduation. He spoke about the lasting impact of losing a child and made clear that the family did not view grief as something they would simply move past. At the same time, Steve and Kristi remained outspoken about wanting answers from investigators and about keeping the focus on the victims rather than allowing the case to become solely about Kohberger. The interview ultimately combined the family’s personal memories of Kaylee with their continuing effort to understand the evidence, the possible motive and whether any connection existed between Kohberger and the victims before the murders.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75398183Mon, 28 Sep 2026 04:30:03 +0000Bobby CapucciIn their 48 Hours interview with Peter Van Sant, Steve and Kristi Goncalves discussed the investigation into the murders of their daughter Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, while also sharing what they believed they had...
The interview also focused heavily on Kaylee herself and the family’s continuing grief. Steve Goncalves described his daughter as driven, competitive and someone who had plans for her future, including a job lined up after graduation. He spoke about the lasting impact of losing a child and made clear that the family did not view grief as something they would simply move past. At the same time, Steve and Kristi remained outspoken about wanting answers from investigators and about keeping the focus on the victims rather than allowing the case to become solely about Kohberger. The interview ultimately combined the family’s personal memories of Kaylee with their continuing effort to understand the evidence, the possible motive and whether any connection existed between Kohberger and the victims before the murders.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1027bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-bryan-kohberger-and-the-family-tree-that-led-investigators-to-him--75398182
That process eventually helped point investigators toward Kohberger, who was living in Pullman, Washington, just a short drive from Moscow. Once he became a focus, authorities began comparing the genealogical lead with other evidence, including the white Hyundai Elantra, cellphone records and surveillance footage. Investigators later obtained trash from the Kohberger family home in Pennsylvania and tested DNA from it, finding a familial relationship consistent with the father of the person whose DNA had been recovered from the sheath. That additional testing strengthened the identification and became one of the key steps that led authorities to arrest Kohberger in December 2022.


to contact me:  

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75398182Mon, 28 Sep 2026 02:30:04 +0000Bobby CapucciInvestigators used investigative genetic genealogy to help identify Bryan Kohberger after DNA recovered from the knife sheath found at the King Road crime scene did not initially produce a direct match in law-enforcement databases. Investigators...
That process eventually helped point investigators toward Kohberger, who was living in Pullman, Washington, just a short drive from Moscow. Once he became a focus, authorities began comparing the genealogical lead with other evidence, including the white Hyundai Elantra, cellphone records and surveillance footage. Investigators later obtained trash from the Kohberger family home in Pennsylvania and tested DNA from it, finding a familial relationship consistent with the father of the person whose DNA had been recovered from the sheath. That additional testing strengthened the identification and became one of the key steps that led authorities to arrest Kohberger in December 2022.


to contact me:  

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>699bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/profile-of-evil-the-btk-killer-9-27-26--75398143
Rader remained unidentified for decades while living what appeared to be an ordinary suburban life, working various jobs, serving as a church leader and raising a family. He resurfaced in 2004 by sending new communications to the media, and that decision ultimately led investigators to him. Police traced a computer disk he had mailed to a local television station back to his church and then used additional evidence, including DNA, to confirm his identity. Rader was arrested in February 2005, later pleaded guilty to all 10 murders and received 10 consecutive life sentences.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75398143Mon, 28 Sep 2026 00:30:03 +0000Bobby CapucciDennis Rader, known as the BTK killer, was an American serial killer who murdered 10 people in and around Wichita, Kansas, between 1974 and 1991. The initials BTK stood for “Bind, Torture, Kill,” a name Rader gave himself in letters he sent to police...
Rader remained unidentified for decades while living what appeared to be an ordinary suburban life, working various jobs, serving as a church leader and raising a family. He resurfaced in 2004 by sending new communications to the media, and that decision ultimately led investigators to him. Police traced a computer disk he had mailed to a local television station back to his church and then used additional evidence, including DNA, to confirm his identity. Rader was arrested in February 2005, later pleaded guilty to all 10 murders and received 10 consecutive life sentences.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1365breakingnewsdaily,crime,murder,murderino,mystery,newsreports,podcast,podcastersofinstagram,serialkiller,serialkillers,ssdgm,truecrime,truecrimeaddict,truecrimecommunity,truecrimefan,truecrimejunkie,truecrimeobsessed,truecrimepodcast,unsolved,unsolvedmysteriestruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/jp-morgan-responds-to-the-usvi-s-motion-to-strike-affirmative-defenses-part-4-9-27-26--75363900
JP Morgan contends that high-ranking USVI officials, including former First Lady Cecile de Jongh, played a role in facilitating Epstein’s operations by managing his local companies and helping spread his influence throughout the government. The bank alleges that Epstein’s ties with local political figures allowed him to receive favorable treatment, such as tax benefits and reduced oversight, despite his known criminal background/

The USVI's motion to strike these defenses is viewed by JP Morgan as an attempt to avoid exposing the government's own culpability. Conversely, the USVI argues that the bank’s defenses are baseless and are intended to deflect from its failure to act on clear signs of Epstein's criminal behavior​.




to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.94.5.pdf (courtlistener.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75363900Sun, 27 Sep 2026 22:30:04 +0000Bobby CapucciJP Morgan has responded to the U.S. Virgin Islands' (USVI) motion to strike several of its affirmative defenses in the ongoing lawsuit related to Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operations. The bank argues that these defenses are crucial to...
JP Morgan contends that high-ranking USVI officials, including former First Lady Cecile de Jongh, played a role in facilitating Epstein’s operations by managing his local companies and helping spread his influence throughout the government. The bank alleges that Epstein’s ties with local political figures allowed him to receive favorable treatment, such as tax benefits and reduced oversight, despite his known criminal background/

The USVI's motion to strike these defenses is viewed by JP Morgan as an attempt to avoid exposing the government's own culpability. Conversely, the USVI argues that the bank’s defenses are baseless and are intended to deflect from its failure to act on clear signs of Epstein's criminal behavior​.




to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.94.5.pdf (courtlistener.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>954epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/jp-morgan-responds-to-the-usvi-s-motion-to-strike-affirmative-defenses-part-3-9-27-26--75363903
JP Morgan contends that high-ranking USVI officials, including former First Lady Cecile de Jongh, played a role in facilitating Epstein’s operations by managing his local companies and helping spread his influence throughout the government. The bank alleges that Epstein’s ties with local political figures allowed him to receive favorable treatment, such as tax benefits and reduced oversight, despite his known criminal background/

The USVI's motion to strike these defenses is viewed by JP Morgan as an attempt to avoid exposing the government's own culpability. Conversely, the USVI argues that the bank’s defenses are baseless and are intended to deflect from its failure to act on clear signs of Epstein's criminal behavior​.




to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.94.5.pdf (courtlistener.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75363903Sun, 27 Sep 2026 20:30:03 +0000Bobby CapucciJP Morgan has responded to the U.S. Virgin Islands' (USVI) motion to strike several of its affirmative defenses in the ongoing lawsuit related to Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operations. The bank argues that these defenses are crucial to...
JP Morgan contends that high-ranking USVI officials, including former First Lady Cecile de Jongh, played a role in facilitating Epstein’s operations by managing his local companies and helping spread his influence throughout the government. The bank alleges that Epstein’s ties with local political figures allowed him to receive favorable treatment, such as tax benefits and reduced oversight, despite his known criminal background/

The USVI's motion to strike these defenses is viewed by JP Morgan as an attempt to avoid exposing the government's own culpability. Conversely, the USVI argues that the bank’s defenses are baseless and are intended to deflect from its failure to act on clear signs of Epstein's criminal behavior​.




to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.94.5.pdf (courtlistener.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>693epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/jp-morgan-responds-to-the-usvi-s-motion-to-strike-affirmative-defenses-part-2-9-27-26--75363899https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75363899Sun, 27 Sep 2026 18:30:05 +0000Bobby Capucci785falsefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/jp-morgan-responds-to-the-usvi-s-motion-to-strike-affirmative-defenses-part-1-9-27-26--75363902
JP Morgan contends that high-ranking USVI officials, including former First Lady Cecile de Jongh, played a role in facilitating Epstein’s operations by managing his local companies and helping spread his influence throughout the government. The bank alleges that Epstein’s ties with local political figures allowed him to receive favorable treatment, such as tax benefits and reduced oversight, despite his known criminal background/

The USVI's motion to strike these defenses is viewed by JP Morgan as an attempt to avoid exposing the government's own culpability. Conversely, the USVI argues that the bank’s defenses are baseless and are intended to deflect from its failure to act on clear signs of Epstein's criminal behavior​.




to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.94.5.pdf (courtlistener.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75363902Sun, 27 Sep 2026 16:30:03 +0000Bobby CapucciJP Morgan has responded to the U.S. Virgin Islands' (USVI) motion to strike several of its affirmative defenses in the ongoing lawsuit related to Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operations. The bank argues that these defenses are crucial to...
JP Morgan contends that high-ranking USVI officials, including former First Lady Cecile de Jongh, played a role in facilitating Epstein’s operations by managing his local companies and helping spread his influence throughout the government. The bank alleges that Epstein’s ties with local political figures allowed him to receive favorable treatment, such as tax benefits and reduced oversight, despite his known criminal background/

The USVI's motion to strike these defenses is viewed by JP Morgan as an attempt to avoid exposing the government's own culpability. Conversely, the USVI argues that the bank’s defenses are baseless and are intended to deflect from its failure to act on clear signs of Epstein's criminal behavior​.




to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.94.5.pdf (courtlistener.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>671epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-alan-dershowitz-offers-kohberger-some-unsolicited-legal-advice-9-27-26--75381924
Dershowitz returned to the case in 2025 and compared Kohberger’s possible defense strategy to aspects of the O.J. Simpson case, emphasizing the importance of challenging how forensic evidence was collected, handled and interpreted rather than simply denying every fact presented by prosecutors. After Kohberger ultimately pleaded guilty in exchange for avoiding the death penalty, Dershowitz criticized the prosecution’s handling of the plea agreement, arguing that prosecutors should have required Kohberger to provide a full account of the murders as part of the deal. His criticism was that the agreement secured guilty pleas and life sentences but left the victims’ families and the public without answers about motive, planning and exactly what happened inside the King Road house.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75381924Sun, 27 Sep 2026 14:30:03 +0000Bobby CapucciAlan Dershowitz said early in the Bryan Kohberger case that the evidence outlined in the probable cause affidavit looked damaging, but he cautioned that the document represented only the prosecution’s version of events. Speaking after the affidavit...
Dershowitz returned to the case in 2025 and compared Kohberger’s possible defense strategy to aspects of the O.J. Simpson case, emphasizing the importance of challenging how forensic evidence was collected, handled and interpreted rather than simply denying every fact presented by prosecutors. After Kohberger ultimately pleaded guilty in exchange for avoiding the death penalty, Dershowitz criticized the prosecution’s handling of the plea agreement, arguing that prosecutors should have required Kohberger to provide a full account of the murders as part of the deal. His criticism was that the agreement secured guilty pleas and life sentences but left the victims’ families and the public without answers about motive, planning and exactly what happened inside the King Road house.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2183bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-washington-state-university-9-27-26--75381923

Kohberger’s time at WSU ended abruptly after his arrest in Pennsylvania in December 2022. He had completed only one semester of the doctoral program, and the university subsequently terminated his enrollment and teaching position. Investigators searched his Pullman apartment and office, seized property and examined his activities as they reconstructed his life in Washington during the months leading up to the murders. What had begun as the start of an advanced academic career in criminology ultimately became a central part of the investigation, with detectives scrutinizing his studies, employment, relationships, movements and behavior during the brief period he lived just across the state line from Moscow.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75381923Sun, 27 Sep 2026 12:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBryan Kohberger arrived at Washington State University in Pullman in 2022 to pursue a Ph.D. in criminology, just months before the murders of four University of Idaho students in nearby Moscow. He worked as a teaching assistant while attending classes...

Kohberger’s time at WSU ended abruptly after his arrest in Pennsylvania in December 2022. He had completed only one semester of the doctoral program, and the university subsequently terminated his enrollment and teaching position. Investigators searched his Pullman apartment and office, seized property and examined his activities as they reconstructed his life in Washington during the months leading up to the murders. What had begun as the start of an advanced academic career in criminology ultimately became a central part of the investigation, with detectives scrutinizing his studies, employment, relationships, movements and behavior during the brief period he lived just across the state line from Moscow.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2692bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-johanna-sjoberg-s-deposition-in-the-maxwell-virginia-roberts-suit-part-7-10-9-27-26--75381972

Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein’s company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein’s residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg’s deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75381972Sun, 27 Sep 2026 10:30:03 +0000Bobby CapucciIn her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her...

Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein’s company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein’s residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg’s deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3110epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-johanna-sjoberg-s-deposition-in-the-maxwell-virginia-roberts-suit-part-4-6-9-25-26--75381970

Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein’s company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein’s residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg’s deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75381970Sun, 27 Sep 2026 08:30:03 +0000Bobby CapucciIn her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her...

Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein’s company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein’s residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg’s deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2596epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-johanna-sjoberg-s-deposition-in-the-maxwell-virginia-roberts-suit-part-1-3-9-25-26--75381971

Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein’s company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein’s residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg’s deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75381971Sun, 27 Sep 2026 06:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her...

Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein’s company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein’s residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg’s deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2524epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-prosecutors-want-to-limit-kohberger-s-alibi--75381918
By February 2025, prosecutors asked the court to prohibit Kohberger from presenting any alibi evidence through witnesses or experts and argued that, because of the defense’s alleged failure to comply with the alibi-disclosure requirements, the only person who should be allowed to testify about his claimed whereabouts was Kohberger himself. That request would have significantly restricted the defense’s ability to use expert Sy Ray and cellphone-location evidence to corroborate the claim that Kohberger was driving south and west of Moscow rather than inside the King Road house. The prosecution’s position was essentially that Kohberger had been given repeated opportunities to provide a legally sufficient alibi and had failed to do so, meaning the defense should not be allowed to expand or strengthen that claim in front of the jury.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75381918Sun, 27 Sep 2026 04:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciProsecutors sought to sharply limit Bryan Kohberger’s ability to present an alibi at trial, arguing that his defense had never provided the level of specificity required under Idaho law. Kohberger’s attorneys said he had been out driving alone during...
By February 2025, prosecutors asked the court to prohibit Kohberger from presenting any alibi evidence through witnesses or experts and argued that, because of the defense’s alleged failure to comply with the alibi-disclosure requirements, the only person who should be allowed to testify about his claimed whereabouts was Kohberger himself. That request would have significantly restricted the defense’s ability to use expert Sy Ray and cellphone-location evidence to corroborate the claim that Kohberger was driving south and west of Moscow rather than inside the King Road house. The prosecution’s position was essentially that Kohberger had been given repeated opportunities to provide a legally sufficient alibi and had failed to do so, meaning the defense should not be allowed to expand or strengthen that claim in front of the jury.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>754bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-anne-taylor-and-the-amount-of-money-she-made-defending-kohberger--75381910
That $485,000 figure does not represent everything Taylor earned during the entire Kohberger case. Records detailing how much she was paid while Latah County was responsible for the defense remain sealed, meaning her total compensation from the beginning of the case has not been publicly established. Taylor had already been earning $200 an hour for her work before the state took over, and reporting described her overall earnings as reaching well into the hundreds of thousands of dollars. Kohberger’s entire publicly funded defense ultimately cost nearly $5.5 million, including attorneys, experts, investigators and other expenses, but the complete breakdown of exactly how much of that total went to Taylor remains unavailable.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75381910Sun, 27 Sep 2026 02:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciAnne Taylor, Bryan Kohberger’s lead defense attorney, was paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for her work on the case. When she was initially appointed, Taylor’s compensation was set at $200 per hour because she was qualified to handle a capital...
That $485,000 figure does not represent everything Taylor earned during the entire Kohberger case. Records detailing how much she was paid while Latah County was responsible for the defense remain sealed, meaning her total compensation from the beginning of the case has not been publicly established. Taylor had already been earning $200 an hour for her work before the state took over, and reporting described her overall earnings as reaching well into the hundreds of thousands of dollars. Kohberger’s entire publicly funded defense ultimately cost nearly $5.5 million, including attorneys, experts, investigators and other expenses, but the complete breakdown of exactly how much of that total went to Taylor remains unavailable.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>693bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/profile-of-evil-ed-kemper-9-26-26--75381852
Kemper’s final murders were his mother and her friend in April 1973. Afterward, he fled California but eventually called police and confessed, effectively turning himself in. He was convicted of eight counts of first-degree murder for the later killings and sentenced to life in prison. Kemper later became widely known because of the extensive interviews he gave about his crimes, upbringing and psychology, which have been studied by law enforcement and criminologists and helped shape early efforts to understand serial offenders.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75381852Sun, 27 Sep 2026 00:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciEdmund Kemper, known as the “Co-ed Killer,” was an American serial killer who murdered 10 people in California, including his paternal grandparents, six young women, his mother and one of his mother’s friends. Kemper committed his first murders as a...
Kemper’s final murders were his mother and her friend in April 1973. Afterward, he fled California but eventually called police and confessed, effectively turning himself in. He was convicted of eight counts of first-degree murder for the later killings and sentenced to life in prison. Kemper later became widely known because of the extensive interviews he gave about his crimes, upbringing and psychology, which have been studied by law enforcement and criminologists and helped shape early efforts to understand serial offenders.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1998breakingnewsdaily,crime,murder,murderino,mystery,newsreports,podcast,podcastersofinstagram,serialkiller,serialkillers,ssdgm,truecrime,truecrimeaddict,truecrimecommunity,truecrimefan,truecrimejunkie,truecrimeobsessed,truecrimepodcast,unsolved,unsolvedmysteriestruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcripts-day-2-part-13-9-26-26--75364015
The defense spent much of the day attacking how strongly the forensic evidence could actually be interpreted. FBI forensic examiner Amanda Bakker was questioned for roughly three hours as defense attorney Michael Burt dug into the technical details of the DNA testing, mixtures, statistical interpretation and the limitations of what the results could establish about when or how DNA was deposited on the objects. Robinson’s lawyers also pushed back against the State’s motive theory, challenging the attempt to characterize the killing as being driven by Kirk’s religious beliefs in addition to political disagreement. By the end of day two, prosecutors had added important physical evidence to the surveillance case presented on day one, but the defense had begun laying out the approach it would use throughout the hearing: concede that certain items contained Robinson-associated evidence while aggressively challenging what that evidence actually proved about possession, timing, motive and the circumstances of Kirk’s killing.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75364015Sat, 26 Sep 2026 22:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay two of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing focused heavily on prosecutors’ effort to connect Robinson to the Utah Valley University campus and to the physical evidence recovered after Charlie Kirk was shot. Investigators introduced additional...
The defense spent much of the day attacking how strongly the forensic evidence could actually be interpreted. FBI forensic examiner Amanda Bakker was questioned for roughly three hours as defense attorney Michael Burt dug into the technical details of the DNA testing, mixtures, statistical interpretation and the limitations of what the results could establish about when or how DNA was deposited on the objects. Robinson’s lawyers also pushed back against the State’s motive theory, challenging the attempt to characterize the killing as being driven by Kirk’s religious beliefs in addition to political disagreement. By the end of day two, prosecutors had added important physical evidence to the surveillance case presented on day one, but the defense had begun laying out the approach it would use throughout the hearing: concede that certain items contained Robinson-associated evidence while aggressively challenging what that evidence actually proved about possession, timing, motive and the circumstances of Kirk’s killing.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1210breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/jes-staley-s-reply-memo-in-support-of-the-motion-to-dismiss-the-jp-morgan-claims-part-1-9-26-26--75363904Jes Staley’s lawyers used the May 2023 filing to argue that JPMorgan Chase’s third-party claims against him should be dismissed outright. The bank had sought contribution and indemnification from Staley in the lawsuits brought by a Jane Doe plaintiff and the U.S. Virgin Islands over JPMorgan’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, but Staley argued those claims were legally defective. His attorneys said the Trafficking Victims Protection Act did not create a right to contribution or indemnification and that JPMorgan could not use New York state law to manufacture one. They also argued that JPMorgan was being sued for its own alleged conduct, not merely for Staley’s actions, which undercut the bank’s attempt to shift liability onto him. Staley’s side further pointed to JPMorgan’s own pleadings, which said his alleged misconduct fell outside the scope of his employment, and argued that the bank had failed to show that Staley caused the same injuries for which JPMorgan itself was being sued.


Staley also attacked JPMorgan’s separate employment-related claims for breach of fiduciary duty and faithless servant, arguing they were time-barred and inadequately pleaded. His attorneys said JPMorgan had been on notice for years that Staley’s relationship with Epstein warranted scrutiny, particularly after Epstein’s 2019 arrest and after the bank produced more than 1,200 Staley-Epstein emails to U.K. authorities. They argued that JPMorgan could not claim it only recently discovered the alleged misconduct when it possessed decades of records and had ample reason to investigate sooner. The filing also said the bank failed to plead with the required specificity who Staley allegedly deceived, when the deception occurred, or how it caused JPMorgan’s later litigation costs and reputational damage. Staley’s lawyers ultimately asked the court to dismiss all of JPMorgan’s claims against him with prejudice.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Microsoft Word - MTD Reply - Doe an(11210113.11).docx

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75363904Sat, 26 Sep 2026 20:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJes Staley’s lawyers used the May 2023 filing to argue that JPMorgan Chase’s third-party claims against him should be dismissed outright. The bank had sought contribution and indemnification from Staley in the lawsuits brought by a Jane Doe plaintiff...Jes Staley’s lawyers used the May 2023 filing to argue that JPMorgan Chase’s third-party claims against him should be dismissed outright. The bank had sought contribution and indemnification from Staley in the lawsuits brought by a Jane Doe plaintiff and the U.S. Virgin Islands over JPMorgan’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, but Staley argued those claims were legally defective. His attorneys said the Trafficking Victims Protection Act did not create a right to contribution or indemnification and that JPMorgan could not use New York state law to manufacture one. They also argued that JPMorgan was being sued for its own alleged conduct, not merely for Staley’s actions, which undercut the bank’s attempt to shift liability onto him. Staley’s side further pointed to JPMorgan’s own pleadings, which said his alleged misconduct fell outside the scope of his employment, and argued that the bank had failed to show that Staley caused the same injuries for which JPMorgan itself was being sued.


Staley also attacked JPMorgan’s separate employment-related claims for breach of fiduciary duty and faithless servant, arguing they were time-barred and inadequately pleaded. His attorneys said JPMorgan had been on notice for years that Staley’s relationship with Epstein warranted scrutiny, particularly after Epstein’s 2019 arrest and after the bank produced more than 1,200 Staley-Epstein emails to U.K. authorities. They argued that JPMorgan could not claim it only recently discovered the alleged misconduct when it possessed decades of records and had ample reason to investigate sooner. The filing also said the bank failed to plead with the required specificity who Staley allegedly deceived, when the deception occurred, or how it caused JPMorgan’s later litigation costs and reputational damage. Staley’s lawyers ultimately asked the court to dismiss all of JPMorgan’s claims against him with prejudice.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Microsoft Word - MTD Reply - Doe an(11210113.11).docx

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>684epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-usvi-and-their-motion-to-strike-the-jp-morgan-affirmative-defenses-part-2-9-26-26--75363901
The USVI responds that these defenses are legally unavailable because it is acting as a sovereign enforcing the Trafficking Victims Protection Act on behalf of the public, not as a private litigant seeking compensation for an ordinary injury. Citing decisions holding that equitable and fault-shifting defenses generally cannot be used against governments enforcing public rights, the USVI argues that JPMorgan cannot evade scrutiny of its own conduct by blaming territorial officials for allegedly failing to uncover or stop Epstein sooner. The government maintains that allowing the defenses to remain would produce unnecessary discovery into its policy and enforcement decisions, increase the cost and length of the litigation, and distract from the central question of whether JPMorgan violated federal trafficking law.



to contat me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75363901Sat, 26 Sep 2026 18:30:05 +0000Bobby CapucciThe Government of the United States Virgin Islands asks the court to strike four affirmative defenses asserted by JPMorgan in the lawsuit accusing the bank of knowingly participating in and benefiting from Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking operation....
The USVI responds that these defenses are legally unavailable because it is acting as a sovereign enforcing the Trafficking Victims Protection Act on behalf of the public, not as a private litigant seeking compensation for an ordinary injury. Citing decisions holding that equitable and fault-shifting defenses generally cannot be used against governments enforcing public rights, the USVI argues that JPMorgan cannot evade scrutiny of its own conduct by blaming territorial officials for allegedly failing to uncover or stop Epstein sooner. The government maintains that allowing the defenses to remain would produce unnecessary discovery into its policy and enforcement decisions, increase the cost and length of the litigation, and distract from the central question of whether JPMorgan violated federal trafficking law.



to contat me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>692epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-usvi-and-their-motion-to-strike-the-jp-morgan-affirmative-defenses-part-1-9-26-26--75363906
The USVI responds that these defenses are legally unavailable because it is acting as a sovereign enforcing the Trafficking Victims Protection Act on behalf of the public, not as a private litigant seeking compensation for an ordinary injury. Citing decisions holding that equitable and fault-shifting defenses generally cannot be used against governments enforcing public rights, the USVI argues that JPMorgan cannot evade scrutiny of its own conduct by blaming territorial officials for allegedly failing to uncover or stop Epstein sooner. The government maintains that allowing the defenses to remain would produce unnecessary discovery into its policy and enforcement decisions, increase the cost and length of the litigation, and distract from the central question of whether JPMorgan violated federal trafficking law.



to contat me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75363906Sat, 26 Sep 2026 16:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe Government of the United States Virgin Islands asks the court to strike four affirmative defenses asserted by JPMorgan in the lawsuit accusing the bank of knowingly participating in and benefiting from Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking operation....
The USVI responds that these defenses are legally unavailable because it is acting as a sovereign enforcing the Trafficking Victims Protection Act on behalf of the public, not as a private litigant seeking compensation for an ordinary injury. Citing decisions holding that equitable and fault-shifting defenses generally cannot be used against governments enforcing public rights, the USVI argues that JPMorgan cannot evade scrutiny of its own conduct by blaming territorial officials for allegedly failing to uncover or stop Epstein sooner. The government maintains that allowing the defenses to remain would produce unnecessary discovery into its policy and enforcement decisions, increase the cost and length of the litigation, and distract from the central question of whether JPMorgan violated federal trafficking law.



to contat me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>614epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-goncalves-family-and-their-full-court-press-for-justice-9-26-26--75358533
That determination continued through the long pretrial process, as the family attended hearings, reacted publicly to major rulings and maintained a visible presence around the case. They were especially vocal about wanting the prosecution to move forward aggressively and about ensuring that the focus remained on the four victims rather than being consumed entirely by Bryan Kohberger and his defense. For the Goncalves family, “Justice for Kaylee” became more than a slogan; it was the foundation of their public campaign to demand transparency, accountability and a legal outcome they believed reflected the gravity of what happened inside the King Road house.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75358533Sat, 26 Sep 2026 14:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe Goncalves family remained one of the most outspoken voices following the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, repeatedly pressing investigators, prosecutors and the courts for answers and accountability....
That determination continued through the long pretrial process, as the family attended hearings, reacted publicly to major rulings and maintained a visible presence around the case. They were especially vocal about wanting the prosecution to move forward aggressively and about ensuring that the focus remained on the four victims rather than being consumed entirely by Bryan Kohberger and his defense. For the Goncalves family, “Justice for Kaylee” became more than a slogan; it was the foundation of their public campaign to demand transparency, accountability and a legal outcome they believed reflected the gravity of what happened inside the King Road house.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2897bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-works-every-angle-trying-to-punch-holes-in-evidence-9-26-26--75358532
The defense also targeted other pillars of the state’s case, including surveillance video, eyewitness testimony and the suggestion that Kohberger had any prior connection to the victims. His lawyers argued that the prosecution was trying to turn a collection of circumstantial evidence into a single narrative without proving that each piece meant what the state claimed it did. Through motions, expert challenges and discovery fights, the defense repeatedly tried to separate the evidence into individual parts and show that each one had limitations, alternative explanations or unanswered questions. The strategy was aimed at creating reasonable doubt by arguing that the prosecution’s case looked much less definitive when every piece of evidence was examined on its own.


to ocntact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75358532Sat, 26 Sep 2026 12:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBryan Kohberger’s defense spent much of the pretrial period trying to punch holes in the prosecution’s case by attacking the reliability, interpretation and admissibility of the evidence tying him to the murders. His attorneys challenged the DNA...
The defense also targeted other pillars of the state’s case, including surveillance video, eyewitness testimony and the suggestion that Kohberger had any prior connection to the victims. His lawyers argued that the prosecution was trying to turn a collection of circumstantial evidence into a single narrative without proving that each piece meant what the state claimed it did. Through motions, expert challenges and discovery fights, the defense repeatedly tried to separate the evidence into individual parts and show that each one had limitations, alternative explanations or unanswered questions. The strategy was aimed at creating reasonable doubt by arguing that the prosecution’s case looked much less definitive when every piece of evidence was examined on its own.


to ocntact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2327bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-michael-proctor-and-the-karen-read-investigation-9-26-26--75358531
In March 2025, following an internal review, Proctor was terminated from the Massachusetts State Police. The disciplinary board cited unsatisfactory performance and violations related to the mishandling of sensitive information and inappropriate communications during the investigation. This development has significant implications for the upcoming retrial of Karen Read, as Proctor's actions and the subsequent questions about the investigation's integrity are expected to be focal points in the defense's strategy


to  contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75358531Sat, 26 Sep 2026 10:30:02 +0000Bobby Capucci​Michael Proctor, a former Massachusetts State Police trooper, served as the lead investigator in the case against Karen Read, who is accused of the 2022 death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. Proctor's role encompassed overseeing...
In March 2025, following an internal review, Proctor was terminated from the Massachusetts State Police. The disciplinary board cited unsatisfactory performance and violations related to the mishandling of sensitive information and inappropriate communications during the investigation. This development has significant implications for the upcoming retrial of Karen Read, as Proctor's actions and the subsequent questions about the investigation's integrity are expected to be focal points in the defense's strategy


to  contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3002johnokeefecase,justiceforjj,justiceforjohnokeefe#karenread,justiceforkarenread,karenreadcase,karenreadcoverage,karenreaddefense #truthforjohn,karenreadevidence,karenreadfacts,karenreadinnocent,karenreadmurdertrial,karenreadnews,karenreadtrial,karenreadtrialdailynews,karenreadtrialnews,karenreadtrialupdates,karenreadupdates,newstruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-karen-read-the-trial-the-autopsy-and-the-letters-9-25-26--75358530
​In the Karen Read case, unsealed letters between Norfolk District Attorney Michael Morrissey and federal authorities reveal a complex dynamic. Morrissey expressed concerns about a federal investigation potentially interfering with the state's prosecution of Read, suggesting possible biases within the U.S. Attorney's Office. He requested the investigation be transferred to another jurisdiction. The Department of Justice reviewed this request but found no basis for recusal, indicating the federal investigation would proceed under the current office. These correspondences highlight tensions between state and federal authorities regarding the handling of the case.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75358530Sat, 26 Sep 2026 08:30:02 +0000Bobby Capucci​In the Karen Read murder trial, concerns have emerged regarding the transparency of autopsy information related to the death of Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. While autopsy photographs have been made public through defense court filings, the...
​In the Karen Read case, unsealed letters between Norfolk District Attorney Michael Morrissey and federal authorities reveal a complex dynamic. Morrissey expressed concerns about a federal investigation potentially interfering with the state's prosecution of Read, suggesting possible biases within the U.S. Attorney's Office. He requested the investigation be transferred to another jurisdiction. The Department of Justice reviewed this request but found no basis for recusal, indicating the federal investigation would proceed under the current office. These correspondences highlight tensions between state and federal authorities regarding the handling of the case.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1895johnokeefecase,justiceforjj,justiceforjohnokeefe#karenread,justiceforkarenread,karenreadcase,karenreadcoverage,karenreaddefense #truthforjohn,karenreadevidence,karenreadfacts,karenreadinnocent,karenreadmurdertrial,karenreadnews,karenreadtrial,karenreadtrialdailynews,karenreadtrialnews,karenreadtrialupdates,karenreadupdates,newstruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-ghislaine-maxwell-s-security-team-speaks-out-after-her-arrest-9-25-26--75102562After Ghislaine Maxwell’s July 2020 arrest, members of her private security operation pushed back hard against the government’s portrayal of her as a fugitive deliberately hiding from law enforcement. Her security adviser, former British military man Matt Hellyer, later said Maxwell had been “the most hunted lady” in the United States and perhaps the world, explaining that his team constantly moved her because members of the public and the press could recognize her within minutes. Hellyer said the goal was to make her “disappear again” whenever her location became known. In court filings supporting Maxwell’s bail request, her security team also insisted that she had not been trying to flee the country and was not a flight risk, with the head of the company even agreeing to post a $1 million bond on her behalf. Maxwell’s lawyers said the security measures, remote properties and secrecy were meant to protect her from relentless media attention rather than conceal her from federal agents.


The government told a very different story. After Epstein’s 2019 arrest and death, Maxwell vanished from public view, bought the secluded 156-acre “Tucked Away” estate in Bradford, New Hampshire, through a corporate structure and alias, and did not disclose her location even though her lawyers remained in contact with prosecutors. The FBI said it had been secretly monitoring her whereabouts for months, but agents did not actually locate and arrest her until July 2, 2020, nearly a year after Epstein’s arrest, not literally “years” later. Investigators eventually used cellphone-location records, GPS data and a Stingray-style device to narrow her position down to the New Hampshire property. When agents arrived, prosecutors said Maxwell moved into another room rather than opening the door, and they found a cellphone wrapped in foil, which they cited as evidence of efforts to avoid detection. So while Maxwell’s security team framed the episode as protection from press harassment, prosecutors portrayed it as a sophisticated effort by a wealthy, internationally connected defendant to remain difficult to find until federal investigators finally pinned down her location.





to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75102562Sat, 26 Sep 2026 06:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciAfter Ghislaine Maxwell’s July 2020 arrest, members of her private security operation pushed back hard against the government’s portrayal of her as a fugitive deliberately hiding from law enforcement. Her security adviser, former British military man...After Ghislaine Maxwell’s July 2020 arrest, members of her private security operation pushed back hard against the government’s portrayal of her as a fugitive deliberately hiding from law enforcement. Her security adviser, former British military man Matt Hellyer, later said Maxwell had been “the most hunted lady” in the United States and perhaps the world, explaining that his team constantly moved her because members of the public and the press could recognize her within minutes. Hellyer said the goal was to make her “disappear again” whenever her location became known. In court filings supporting Maxwell’s bail request, her security team also insisted that she had not been trying to flee the country and was not a flight risk, with the head of the company even agreeing to post a $1 million bond on her behalf. Maxwell’s lawyers said the security measures, remote properties and secrecy were meant to protect her from relentless media attention rather than conceal her from federal agents.


The government told a very different story. After Epstein’s 2019 arrest and death, Maxwell vanished from public view, bought the secluded 156-acre “Tucked Away” estate in Bradford, New Hampshire, through a corporate structure and alias, and did not disclose her location even though her lawyers remained in contact with prosecutors. The FBI said it had been secretly monitoring her whereabouts for months, but agents did not actually locate and arrest her until July 2, 2020, nearly a year after Epstein’s arrest, not literally “years” later. Investigators eventually used cellphone-location records, GPS data and a Stingray-style device to narrow her position down to the New Hampshire property. When agents arrived, prosecutors said Maxwell moved into another room rather than opening the door, and they found a cellphone wrapped in foil, which they cited as evidence of efforts to avoid detection. So while Maxwell’s security team framed the episode as protection from press harassment, prosecutors portrayed it as a sophisticated effort by a wealthy, internationally connected defendant to remain difficult to find until federal investigators finally pinned down her location.





to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2731epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-bryan-kohberger-and-the-rubber-gloves--75358709
The fact that Kohberger was reportedly wearing gloves at the time of his arrest became one more piece of circumstantial information folded into the larger narrative prosecutors were building around his conduct after the killings. On its own, wearing gloves was not proof of criminal activity, but investigators viewed it in the context of the DNA evidence, the white Hyundai Elantra, cell-phone records and surveillance evidence already being examined. The report added another layer to questions about whether Kohberger was taking deliberate steps to limit the possibility of leaving behind forensic evidence as law enforcement closed in on him.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75358709Sat, 26 Sep 2026 04:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciReports following Bryan Kohberger’s arrest said he was wearing rubber or latex gloves when authorities took him into custody at his family’s Pennsylvania home in December 2022. The detail immediately drew attention because investigators were already...
The fact that Kohberger was reportedly wearing gloves at the time of his arrest became one more piece of circumstantial information folded into the larger narrative prosecutors were building around his conduct after the killings. On its own, wearing gloves was not proof of criminal activity, but investigators viewed it in the context of the DNA evidence, the white Hyundai Elantra, cell-phone records and surveillance evidence already being examined. The report added another layer to questions about whether Kohberger was taking deliberate steps to limit the possibility of leaving behind forensic evidence as law enforcement closed in on him.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>629bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-the-white-hyundai-elantra-and-the-gas-station-clerk--75358674

The gas station footage was significant because investigators were already trying to reconstruct the movements of a white Hyundai Elantra around Moscow before and after the killings. Later court records showed that law enforcement reviewed extensive surveillance from businesses and residences throughout Moscow, Pullman and the surrounding area as they worked to identify what they called “Vehicle 1,” eventually describing it as a 2011-2016 white Hyundai Elantra and linking the investigation to Bryan Kohberger. But the early gas station image had limitations: it did not clearly show a license plate or the driver, meaning the clerk’s discovery was a potential lead rather than proof that the vehicle was Kohberger’s. It nevertheless became one of several pieces of surveillance investigators examined while building the timeline of the suspect vehicle’s movements.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75358674Sat, 26 Sep 2026 02:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciA gas station clerk in Moscow became part of the early investigation after independently reviewing hours of surveillance footage from the night of the murders and spotting a white sedan she believed resembled the Hyundai Elantra police were searching...

The gas station footage was significant because investigators were already trying to reconstruct the movements of a white Hyundai Elantra around Moscow before and after the killings. Later court records showed that law enforcement reviewed extensive surveillance from businesses and residences throughout Moscow, Pullman and the surrounding area as they worked to identify what they called “Vehicle 1,” eventually describing it as a 2011-2016 white Hyundai Elantra and linking the investigation to Bryan Kohberger. But the early gas station image had limitations: it did not clearly show a license plate or the driver, meaning the clerk’s discovery was a potential lead rather than proof that the vehicle was Kohberger’s. It nevertheless became one of several pieces of surveillance investigators examined while building the timeline of the suspect vehicle’s movements.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>697bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcripts-day-2-part-12-9-24-26--75337543
The defense spent much of the day attacking how strongly the forensic evidence could actually be interpreted. FBI forensic examiner Amanda Bakker was questioned for roughly three hours as defense attorney Michael Burt dug into the technical details of the DNA testing, mixtures, statistical interpretation and the limitations of what the results could establish about when or how DNA was deposited on the objects. Robinson’s lawyers also pushed back against the State’s motive theory, challenging the attempt to characterize the killing as being driven by Kirk’s religious beliefs in addition to political disagreement. By the end of day two, prosecutors had added important physical evidence to the surveillance case presented on day one, but the defense had begun laying out the approach it would use throughout the hearing: concede that certain items contained Robinson-associated evidence while aggressively challenging what that evidence actually proved about possession, timing, motive and the circumstances of Kirk’s killing.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75337543Sat, 26 Sep 2026 00:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay two of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing focused heavily on prosecutors’ effort to connect Robinson to the Utah Valley University campus and to the physical evidence recovered after Charlie Kirk was shot. Investigators introduced additional...
The defense spent much of the day attacking how strongly the forensic evidence could actually be interpreted. FBI forensic examiner Amanda Bakker was questioned for roughly three hours as defense attorney Michael Burt dug into the technical details of the DNA testing, mixtures, statistical interpretation and the limitations of what the results could establish about when or how DNA was deposited on the objects. Robinson’s lawyers also pushed back against the State’s motive theory, challenging the attempt to characterize the killing as being driven by Kirk’s religious beliefs in addition to political disagreement. By the end of day two, prosecutors had added important physical evidence to the surveillance case presented on day one, but the defense had begun laying out the approach it would use throughout the hearing: concede that certain items contained Robinson-associated evidence while aggressively challenging what that evidence actually proved about possession, timing, motive and the circumstances of Kirk’s killing.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>806breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/jes-staley-s-reply-memo-in-support-of-the-motion-to-dismiss-the-jp-morgan-claims-part-2-9-26-26--75363905Jes Staley’s lawyers used the May 2023 filing to argue that JPMorgan Chase’s third-party claims against him should be dismissed outright. The bank had sought contribution and indemnification from Staley in the lawsuits brought by a Jane Doe plaintiff and the U.S. Virgin Islands over JPMorgan’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, but Staley argued those claims were legally defective. His attorneys said the Trafficking Victims Protection Act did not create a right to contribution or indemnification and that JPMorgan could not use New York state law to manufacture one. They also argued that JPMorgan was being sued for its own alleged conduct, not merely for Staley’s actions, which undercut the bank’s attempt to shift liability onto him. Staley’s side further pointed to JPMorgan’s own pleadings, which said his alleged misconduct fell outside the scope of his employment, and argued that the bank had failed to show that Staley caused the same injuries for which JPMorgan itself was being sued.


Staley also attacked JPMorgan’s separate employment-related claims for breach of fiduciary duty and faithless servant, arguing they were time-barred and inadequately pleaded. His attorneys said JPMorgan had been on notice for years that Staley’s relationship with Epstein warranted scrutiny, particularly after Epstein’s 2019 arrest and after the bank produced more than 1,200 Staley-Epstein emails to U.K. authorities. They argued that JPMorgan could not claim it only recently discovered the alleged misconduct when it possessed decades of records and had ample reason to investigate sooner. The filing also said the bank failed to plead with the required specificity who Staley allegedly deceived, when the deception occurred, or how it caused JPMorgan’s later litigation costs and reputational damage. Staley’s lawyers ultimately asked the court to dismiss all of JPMorgan’s claims against him with prejudice.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Microsoft Word - MTD Reply - Doe an(11210113.11).docx

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75363905Fri, 25 Sep 2026 22:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJes Staley’s lawyers used the May 2023 filing to argue that JPMorgan Chase’s third-party claims against him should be dismissed outright. The bank had sought contribution and indemnification from Staley in the lawsuits brought by a Jane Doe plaintiff...Jes Staley’s lawyers used the May 2023 filing to argue that JPMorgan Chase’s third-party claims against him should be dismissed outright. The bank had sought contribution and indemnification from Staley in the lawsuits brought by a Jane Doe plaintiff and the U.S. Virgin Islands over JPMorgan’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, but Staley argued those claims were legally defective. His attorneys said the Trafficking Victims Protection Act did not create a right to contribution or indemnification and that JPMorgan could not use New York state law to manufacture one. They also argued that JPMorgan was being sued for its own alleged conduct, not merely for Staley’s actions, which undercut the bank’s attempt to shift liability onto him. Staley’s side further pointed to JPMorgan’s own pleadings, which said his alleged misconduct fell outside the scope of his employment, and argued that the bank had failed to show that Staley caused the same injuries for which JPMorgan itself was being sued.


Staley also attacked JPMorgan’s separate employment-related claims for breach of fiduciary duty and faithless servant, arguing they were time-barred and inadequately pleaded. His attorneys said JPMorgan had been on notice for years that Staley’s relationship with Epstein warranted scrutiny, particularly after Epstein’s 2019 arrest and after the bank produced more than 1,200 Staley-Epstein emails to U.K. authorities. They argued that JPMorgan could not claim it only recently discovered the alleged misconduct when it possessed decades of records and had ample reason to investigate sooner. The filing also said the bank failed to plead with the required specificity who Staley allegedly deceived, when the deception occurred, or how it caused JPMorgan’s later litigation costs and reputational damage. Staley’s lawyers ultimately asked the court to dismiss all of JPMorgan’s claims against him with prejudice.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Microsoft Word - MTD Reply - Doe an(11210113.11).docx

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>691epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcripts-day-2-part-11-9-24-26--75337549
The defense spent much of the day attacking how strongly the forensic evidence could actually be interpreted. FBI forensic examiner Amanda Bakker was questioned for roughly three hours as defense attorney Michael Burt dug into the technical details of the DNA testing, mixtures, statistical interpretation and the limitations of what the results could establish about when or how DNA was deposited on the objects. Robinson’s lawyers also pushed back against the State’s motive theory, challenging the attempt to characterize the killing as being driven by Kirk’s religious beliefs in addition to political disagreement. By the end of day two, prosecutors had added important physical evidence to the surveillance case presented on day one, but the defense had begun laying out the approach it would use throughout the hearing: concede that certain items contained Robinson-associated evidence while aggressively challenging what that evidence actually proved about possession, timing, motive and the circumstances of Kirk’s killing.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75337549Fri, 25 Sep 2026 22:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay two of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing focused heavily on prosecutors’ effort to connect Robinson to the Utah Valley University campus and to the physical evidence recovered after Charlie Kirk was shot. Investigators introduced additional...
The defense spent much of the day attacking how strongly the forensic evidence could actually be interpreted. FBI forensic examiner Amanda Bakker was questioned for roughly three hours as defense attorney Michael Burt dug into the technical details of the DNA testing, mixtures, statistical interpretation and the limitations of what the results could establish about when or how DNA was deposited on the objects. Robinson’s lawyers also pushed back against the State’s motive theory, challenging the attempt to characterize the killing as being driven by Kirk’s religious beliefs in addition to political disagreement. By the end of day two, prosecutors had added important physical evidence to the surveillance case presented on day one, but the defense had begun laying out the approach it would use throughout the hearing: concede that certain items contained Robinson-associated evidence while aggressively challenging what that evidence actually proved about possession, timing, motive and the circumstances of Kirk’s killing.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>669breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-long-delayed-federal-investigation-into-darren-indyke-and-richard-kahn-part-2-9-25-26--75337546
For years, civil litigation, Virgin Islands lawsuits, banking records and document releases continued exposing pieces of Epstein’s financial infrastructure while Indyke and Kahn remained central figures in that story. A serious federal investigation in 2019 should have examined their records, communications, banking relationships, corporate entities and knowledge of Epstein’s affairs from the beginning. Instead, the government is only now reportedly digging into questions that were staring investigators in the face seven years ago. The issue is not simply whether Indyke or Kahn committed crimes; that remains for prosecutors to determine. The larger scandal is that two men so deeply embedded in Epstein’s legal and financial structure were not subjected to this kind of comprehensive federal scrutiny when the opportunity first presented itself.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75337546Fri, 25 Sep 2026 20:35:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDarren Indyke and Richard Kahn are now reportedly under federal investigation over their longtime roles in Jeffrey Epstein’s financial and legal world, raising the obvious question of why that scrutiny did not come years earlier. Indyke was Epstein’s...
For years, civil litigation, Virgin Islands lawsuits, banking records and document releases continued exposing pieces of Epstein’s financial infrastructure while Indyke and Kahn remained central figures in that story. A serious federal investigation in 2019 should have examined their records, communications, banking relationships, corporate entities and knowledge of Epstein’s affairs from the beginning. Instead, the government is only now reportedly digging into questions that were staring investigators in the face seven years ago. The issue is not simply whether Indyke or Kahn committed crimes; that remains for prosecutors to determine. The larger scandal is that two men so deeply embedded in Epstein’s legal and financial structure were not subjected to this kind of comprehensive federal scrutiny when the opportunity first presented itself.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1358epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-long-delayed-federal-investigation-into-darren-indyke-and-richard-kahn-part-1-9-25-26--75337542
For years, civil litigation, Virgin Islands lawsuits, banking records and document releases continued exposing pieces of Epstein’s financial infrastructure while Indyke and Kahn remained central figures in that story. A serious federal investigation in 2019 should have examined their records, communications, banking relationships, corporate entities and knowledge of Epstein’s affairs from the beginning. Instead, the government is only now reportedly digging into questions that were staring investigators in the face seven years ago. The issue is not simply whether Indyke or Kahn committed crimes; that remains for prosecutors to determine. The larger scandal is that two men so deeply embedded in Epstein’s legal and financial structure were not subjected to this kind of comprehensive federal scrutiny when the opportunity first presented itself.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75337542Fri, 25 Sep 2026 18:30:05 +0000Bobby CapucciDarren Indyke and Richard Kahn are now reportedly under federal investigation over their longtime roles in Jeffrey Epstein’s financial and legal world, raising the obvious question of why that scrutiny did not come years earlier. Indyke was Epstein’s...
For years, civil litigation, Virgin Islands lawsuits, banking records and document releases continued exposing pieces of Epstein’s financial infrastructure while Indyke and Kahn remained central figures in that story. A serious federal investigation in 2019 should have examined their records, communications, banking relationships, corporate entities and knowledge of Epstein’s affairs from the beginning. Instead, the government is only now reportedly digging into questions that were staring investigators in the face seven years ago. The issue is not simply whether Indyke or Kahn committed crimes; that remains for prosecutors to determine. The larger scandal is that two men so deeply embedded in Epstein’s legal and financial structure were not subjected to this kind of comprehensive federal scrutiny when the opportunity first presented itself.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>779epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/leon-black-s-legal-team-ask-the-judge-to-reconsider-the-anonymity-of-his-accuser-9-25-26--75337545
The request represented a significant change from the beginning of the lawsuit, when Black did not oppose Doe’s request to remain anonymous and the court allowed her to proceed under a pseudonym. Judge Clarke ordered Doe to respond to Black’s challenge, but ultimately ruled in April that she could remain anonymous. The court found that the circumstances still favored protecting her identity, citing concerns about threats to her safety and the confidentiality assurances associated with the separate JPMorgan-Epstein litigation in which she had participated. The judge also found that any prejudice to Black was reduced because discovery remained stayed, and ordered that information capable of identifying Doe continue to be redacted. Black’s legal team therefore succeeded in forcing the court to reconsider the issue, but not in persuading the judge to strip Doe of her anonymity.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75337545Fri, 25 Sep 2026 16:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciLeon Black’s attorneys asked Judge Jessica Clarke to reconsider whether the woman suing him as Jane Doe should continue to be allowed to proceed anonymously, arguing that her own conduct had undermined the justification for keeping her identity...
The request represented a significant change from the beginning of the lawsuit, when Black did not oppose Doe’s request to remain anonymous and the court allowed her to proceed under a pseudonym. Judge Clarke ordered Doe to respond to Black’s challenge, but ultimately ruled in April that she could remain anonymous. The court found that the circumstances still favored protecting her identity, citing concerns about threats to her safety and the confidentiality assurances associated with the separate JPMorgan-Epstein litigation in which she had participated. The judge also found that any prejudice to Black was reduced because discovery remained stayed, and ordered that information capable of identifying Doe continue to be redacted. Black’s legal team therefore succeeded in forcing the court to reconsider the issue, but not in persuading the judge to strip Doe of her anonymity.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>676epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/george-mitchell-and-the-epstein-reckoning-that-never-came-9-25-26--75337544Former U.S. Senator George Mitchell has largely avoided the sustained public scrutiny that has followed other powerful men connected to Jeffrey Epstein, despite being directly accused by Virginia Giuffre in sworn testimony. Giuffre said Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell directed her to have sex with Mitchell on more than one occasion while she was being trafficked through Epstein’s network. The allegation appeared in court records from Giuffre’s litigation against Maxwell and was reported publicly years ago, but Mitchell never became a central figure in the broader public reckoning surrounding Epstein in the way Prince Andrew and several other prominent associates did. Mitchell denied Giuffre’s accusation.


That relative lack of attention is especially notable given Mitchell’s stature. He was a former Senate majority leader, a prominent international diplomat and a central figure in the Northern Ireland peace process, yet the allegation against him remained largely on the margins of Epstein coverage for years. More recent document releases have renewed scrutiny of Mitchell’s relationship with Epstein and prompted institutions to distance themselves from him, including Queen’s University Belfast, which removed his name from an institute in 2026. The underlying allegation, however, is not new: Giuffre had publicly identified Mitchell years earlier as one of the powerful men she said Epstein and Maxwell sent her to, leaving a serious accusation that spent much of the Epstein saga receiving comparatively little sustained examination.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75337544Fri, 25 Sep 2026 14:30:03 +0000Bobby CapucciFormer U.S. Senator George Mitchell has largely avoided the sustained public scrutiny that has followed other powerful men connected to Jeffrey Epstein, despite being directly accused by Virginia Giuffre in sworn testimony. Giuffre said Epstein and...Former U.S. Senator George Mitchell has largely avoided the sustained public scrutiny that has followed other powerful men connected to Jeffrey Epstein, despite being directly accused by Virginia Giuffre in sworn testimony. Giuffre said Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell directed her to have sex with Mitchell on more than one occasion while she was being trafficked through Epstein’s network. The allegation appeared in court records from Giuffre’s litigation against Maxwell and was reported publicly years ago, but Mitchell never became a central figure in the broader public reckoning surrounding Epstein in the way Prince Andrew and several other prominent associates did. Mitchell denied Giuffre’s accusation.


That relative lack of attention is especially notable given Mitchell’s stature. He was a former Senate majority leader, a prominent international diplomat and a central figure in the Northern Ireland peace process, yet the allegation against him remained largely on the margins of Epstein coverage for years. More recent document releases have renewed scrutiny of Mitchell’s relationship with Epstein and prompted institutions to distance themselves from him, including Queen’s University Belfast, which removed his name from an institute in 2026. The underlying allegation, however, is not new: Giuffre had publicly identified Mitchell years earlier as one of the powerful men she said Epstein and Maxwell sent her to, leaving a serious accusation that spent much of the Epstein saga receiving comparatively little sustained examination.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>863epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-requests-that-all-camera-s-be-removed-from-the-courtroom-9-25-26--75335642
Prosecutors pushed back against the request and argued that the defense had not shown that cameras themselves were preventing Kohberger from receiving a fair trial. The state maintained that courtroom coverage could be managed through restrictions without eliminating cameras entirely and noted the strong public interest in access to such a high-profile case. Prosecutors also rejected the idea that media attention alone justified closing off visual coverage, arguing that the court could control how cameras operated and address specific problems if they arose. The dispute became another major pretrial battle over how to balance Kohberger’s fair-trial rights against public access and transparency in one of the most closely watched murder cases in the country.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75335642Fri, 25 Sep 2026 10:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBryan Kohberger’s defense asked the court to remove cameras from the courtroom, arguing that extensive media coverage threatened his right to a fair trial and had turned routine proceedings into a spectacle. His attorneys said constant filming of...
Prosecutors pushed back against the request and argued that the defense had not shown that cameras themselves were preventing Kohberger from receiving a fair trial. The state maintained that courtroom coverage could be managed through restrictions without eliminating cameras entirely and noted the strong public interest in access to such a high-profile case. Prosecutors also rejected the idea that media attention alone justified closing off visual coverage, arguing that the court could control how cameras operated and address specific problems if they arose. The dispute became another major pretrial battle over how to balance Kohberger’s fair-trial rights against public access and transparency in one of the most closely watched murder cases in the country.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2565bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-warrants-for-match-group-numerica-and-twitter-9-24-26--75335641
The Numerica Credit Union warrant took investigators in a different direction, toward financial records. Numerica was one of several banks and credit unions served with warrants as police examined financial activity connected to the investigation, alongside institutions such as Bank of America, Wells Fargo, Umpqua Bank and Idaho Central Credit Union. Much of the underlying affidavit and the specific material obtained from Numerica remained sealed or redacted, with the court finding that the documents contained highly intimate information and material that could potentially endanger individuals. Viewed together, the Twitter, Match Group and Numerica warrants illustrated just how wide investigators cast their net: they were examining Kohberger’s social-media activity, dating-app history and financial footprint in an effort to reconstruct his movements, relationships, purchases and possible connections to the victims before and after the murders.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75335641Fri, 25 Sep 2026 08:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciInvestigators in the Bryan Kohberger case used warrants directed at Twitter and Match Group as part of a much broader effort to reconstruct his digital life and determine whether he had any connection to Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle...
The Numerica Credit Union warrant took investigators in a different direction, toward financial records. Numerica was one of several banks and credit unions served with warrants as police examined financial activity connected to the investigation, alongside institutions such as Bank of America, Wells Fargo, Umpqua Bank and Idaho Central Credit Union. Much of the underlying affidavit and the specific material obtained from Numerica remained sealed or redacted, with the court finding that the documents contained highly intimate information and material that could potentially endanger individuals. Viewed together, the Twitter, Match Group and Numerica warrants illustrated just how wide investigators cast their net: they were examining Kohberger’s social-media activity, dating-app history and financial footprint in an effort to reconstruct his movements, relationships, purchases and possible connections to the victims before and after the murders.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3136bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-portland-serial-killer-9-24-26--75335643
What made the case especially controversial was the way Portland police initially pushed back against those fears. In June 2023, after six women had been found dead in the region, the Portland Police Bureau publicly said it had “no reason to believe” the cases were connected and characterized suggestions of a serial killer as unsupported speculation that was creating unnecessary fear. But the picture changed quickly. By July, investigators acknowledged that four of the deaths were believed to be connected and that Calhoun was a person of interest, and prosecutors later began filing murder charges tying him to several of the women. The reversal became a major part of the story because authorities had initially tried to reassure the public that there was no evidence of a common killer, only for subsequent investigations to establish the very kind of connection that residents and victims’ families had been worried about.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75335643Fri, 25 Sep 2026 06:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe man at the center of the Portland serial killer case is Jesse Lee Calhoun, a convicted felon who has been charged with killing multiple women whose bodies were found across northwest Oregon and southwest Washington. Prosecutors have accused...
What made the case especially controversial was the way Portland police initially pushed back against those fears. In June 2023, after six women had been found dead in the region, the Portland Police Bureau publicly said it had “no reason to believe” the cases were connected and characterized suggestions of a serial killer as unsupported speculation that was creating unnecessary fear. But the picture changed quickly. By July, investigators acknowledged that four of the deaths were believed to be connected and that Calhoun was a person of interest, and prosecutors later began filing murder charges tying him to several of the women. The reversal became a major part of the story because authorities had initially tried to reassure the public that there was no evidence of a common killer, only for subsequent investigations to establish the very kind of connection that residents and victims’ families had been worried about.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3853bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-the-somber-tone-hanging-over-the-campus-in-moscow-as-school-resumed--75335636
The investigation also remained an unavoidable presence around the university itself. Police continued working the case, the King Road house remained a crime scene and national media attention kept the murders at the center of campus conversation. Students were returning to classes, dorms and apartments while still processing the fact that four of their peers had been brutally killed just weeks earlier. Even as the university tried to resume some sense of normalcy, the unanswered questions surrounding the murders made that difficult, leaving the campus under a cloud of grief, anxiety and suspicion as the investigation continued.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75335636Fri, 25 Sep 2026 04:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciWhen University of Idaho students returned to Moscow after school break, the unresolved murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin still hung heavily over the campus and the surrounding community. The killings had...
The investigation also remained an unavoidable presence around the university itself. Police continued working the case, the King Road house remained a crime scene and national media attention kept the murders at the center of campus conversation. Students were returning to classes, dorms and apartments while still processing the fact that four of their peers had been brutally killed just weeks earlier. Even as the university tried to resume some sense of normalcy, the unanswered questions surrounding the murders made that difficult, leaving the campus under a cloud of grief, anxiety and suspicion as the investigation continued.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>736bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-bryan-kohberger-and-the-school-records-request--75335635
At the same time, Pleasant Valley officials largely refused to discuss Kohberger publicly, despite repeated media requests and his long history with the district. Kohberger had attended the school system, graduated from Pleasant Valley High School in 2013 and later worked district security from 2016 until resigning in 2021. Internal emails showed administrators were instructed to avoid commenting and to cite privacy laws, even though those laws did not necessarily prohibit all public discussion. The subpoena nevertheless forced the district to cooperate with the criminal case, giving attorneys access to records that could potentially shed light on Kohberger’s educational background, employment history, disciplinary record or other information relevant to the prosecution or defense.


to contact me:

bobycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75335635Fri, 25 Sep 2026 02:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe Pleasant Valley School District in Pennsylvania, where Bryan Kohberger had once been a student and later worked as a part-time security officer, turned over academic and employment records in response to a court-ordered subpoena issued shortly...
At the same time, Pleasant Valley officials largely refused to discuss Kohberger publicly, despite repeated media requests and his long history with the district. Kohberger had attended the school system, graduated from Pleasant Valley High School in 2013 and later worked district security from 2016 until resigning in 2021. Internal emails showed administrators were instructed to avoid commenting and to cite privacy laws, even though those laws did not necessarily prohibit all public discussion. The subpoena nevertheless forced the district to cooperate with the criminal case, giving attorneys access to records that could potentially shed light on Kohberger’s educational background, employment history, disciplinary record or other information relevant to the prosecution or defense.


to contact me:

bobycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1311bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcripts-day-2-part-10-9-24-26--75333675
The defense spent much of the day attacking how strongly the forensic evidence could actually be interpreted. FBI forensic examiner Amanda Bakker was questioned for roughly three hours as defense attorney Michael Burt dug into the technical details of the DNA testing, mixtures, statistical interpretation and the limitations of what the results could establish about when or how DNA was deposited on the objects. Robinson’s lawyers also pushed back against the State’s motive theory, challenging the attempt to characterize the killing as being driven by Kirk’s religious beliefs in addition to political disagreement. By the end of day two, prosecutors had added important physical evidence to the surveillance case presented on day one, but the defense had begun laying out the approach it would use throughout the hearing: concede that certain items contained Robinson-associated evidence while aggressively challenging what that evidence actually proved about possession, timing, motive and the circumstances of Kirk’s killing.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75333675Fri, 25 Sep 2026 00:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay two of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing focused heavily on prosecutors’ effort to connect Robinson to the Utah Valley University campus and to the physical evidence recovered after Charlie Kirk was shot. Investigators introduced additional...
The defense spent much of the day attacking how strongly the forensic evidence could actually be interpreted. FBI forensic examiner Amanda Bakker was questioned for roughly three hours as defense attorney Michael Burt dug into the technical details of the DNA testing, mixtures, statistical interpretation and the limitations of what the results could establish about when or how DNA was deposited on the objects. Robinson’s lawyers also pushed back against the State’s motive theory, challenging the attempt to characterize the killing as being driven by Kirk’s religious beliefs in addition to political disagreement. By the end of day two, prosecutors had added important physical evidence to the surveillance case presented on day one, but the defense had begun laying out the approach it would use throughout the hearing: concede that certain items contained Robinson-associated evidence while aggressively challenging what that evidence actually proved about possession, timing, motive and the circumstances of Kirk’s killing.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>738epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/federal-prosecutors-investigate-darren-indyke-and-richard-kahn-over-epstein-ties-9-24-26--75333676
The investigation is notable because Indyke and Kahn were not peripheral figures who occasionally crossed paths with Epstein. They handled important aspects of his businesses, finances, legal matters and, after his death, his estate, giving them extensive access to the infrastructure that surrounded him. Their relationships with Epstein have already drawn scrutiny from Congress, civil litigants and survivors, but the reported federal investigation raises the stakes considerably by putting their conduct under examination by criminal prosecutors. At this stage, the existence of an investigation does not mean either man will be charged, but it represents one of the clearest signs yet that authorities are looking beyond Epstein himself and examining the professional network that helped manage his money and affairs for years.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Exclusive | Federal Prosecutors Open Probe Into Jeffrey Epstein’s Executors - WSJ

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75333676Thu, 24 Sep 2026 22:30:03 +0000Bobby CapucciFederal prosecutors in Manhattan have opened an investigation into Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, two of Jeffrey Epstein’s longest-serving advisers and the co-executors of his estate. Indyke served for years as Epstein’s attorney, while Kahn worked...
The investigation is notable because Indyke and Kahn were not peripheral figures who occasionally crossed paths with Epstein. They handled important aspects of his businesses, finances, legal matters and, after his death, his estate, giving them extensive access to the infrastructure that surrounded him. Their relationships with Epstein have already drawn scrutiny from Congress, civil litigants and survivors, but the reported federal investigation raises the stakes considerably by putting their conduct under examination by criminal prosecutors. At this stage, the existence of an investigation does not mean either man will be charged, but it represents one of the clearest signs yet that authorities are looking beyond Epstein himself and examining the professional network that helped manage his money and affairs for years.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Exclusive | Federal Prosecutors Open Probe Into Jeffrey Epstein’s Executors - WSJ

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>749epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/todd-blanche-argues-for-a-stay-in-the-katie-phang-epstein-related-lawsuit-part-2-9-24-26--75320471
The reply also disputes Phang’s claim that DOJ has simply been ignoring the court’s orders, arguing instead that the government has been litigating unresolved questions about the scope of the Epstein Files Transparency Act and the court’s authority to compel disclosure. Blanche’s attorneys contend that requiring immediate compliance could cause irreparable harm by forcing the government to undertake work that could later be found unnecessary if the appeal succeeds, while a temporary pause would preserve the status quo. In short, the government asks Judge Emmet Sullivan to suspend the disputed portion of the enforcement order long enough for the appellate court to consider DOJ’s arguments, while Phang maintains that the request is another attempt to delay production of records the government has already been ordered to review and release.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.291779.48.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75320471Thu, 24 Sep 2026 20:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciTodd Blanche’s reply argues that the court should partially stay its enforcement order while the Justice Department appeals, particularly as it relates to the review and production of foreign-language Epstein materials. The government contends that...
The reply also disputes Phang’s claim that DOJ has simply been ignoring the court’s orders, arguing instead that the government has been litigating unresolved questions about the scope of the Epstein Files Transparency Act and the court’s authority to compel disclosure. Blanche’s attorneys contend that requiring immediate compliance could cause irreparable harm by forcing the government to undertake work that could later be found unnecessary if the appeal succeeds, while a temporary pause would preserve the status quo. In short, the government asks Judge Emmet Sullivan to suspend the disputed portion of the enforcement order long enough for the appellate court to consider DOJ’s arguments, while Phang maintains that the request is another attempt to delay production of records the government has already been ordered to review and release.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.291779.48.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>559epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/todd-blanche-argues-for-a-stay-in-the-katie-phang-epstein-related-lawsuit-part-1-9-24-26--75320474
The reply also disputes Phang’s claim that DOJ has simply been ignoring the court’s orders, arguing instead that the government has been litigating unresolved questions about the scope of the Epstein Files Transparency Act and the court’s authority to compel disclosure. Blanche’s attorneys contend that requiring immediate compliance could cause irreparable harm by forcing the government to undertake work that could later be found unnecessary if the appeal succeeds, while a temporary pause would preserve the status quo. In short, the government asks Judge Emmet Sullivan to suspend the disputed portion of the enforcement order long enough for the appellate court to consider DOJ’s arguments, while Phang maintains that the request is another attempt to delay production of records the government has already been ordered to review and release.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.291779.48.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75320474Thu, 24 Sep 2026 18:30:05 +0000Bobby CapucciTodd Blanche’s reply argues that the court should partially stay its enforcement order while the Justice Department appeals, particularly as it relates to the review and production of foreign-language Epstein materials. The government contends that...
The reply also disputes Phang’s claim that DOJ has simply been ignoring the court’s orders, arguing instead that the government has been litigating unresolved questions about the scope of the Epstein Files Transparency Act and the court’s authority to compel disclosure. Blanche’s attorneys contend that requiring immediate compliance could cause irreparable harm by forcing the government to undertake work that could later be found unnecessary if the appeal succeeds, while a temporary pause would preserve the status quo. In short, the government asks Judge Emmet Sullivan to suspend the disputed portion of the enforcement order long enough for the appellate court to consider DOJ’s arguments, while Phang maintains that the request is another attempt to delay production of records the government has already been ordered to review and release.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.291779.48.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>628epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/jeffrey-epstein-and-the-highbridge-capital-deal-part-2-9-24-26--75320475Highbridge Capital Management was a major New York hedge fund founded by Glenn Dubin and Henry Swieca that had grown into one of the most successful alternative-asset managers on Wall Street by the early 2000s. In 2004, JPMorgan Chase acquired a majority stake in Highbridge, which was managing roughly $7 billion at the time, giving the bank a much larger foothold in the rapidly expanding hedge-fund business. The deal became important to the Epstein story because Jeffrey Epstein was not simply an outside observer. Records from later litigation showed that he helped connect JPMorgan executive Jes Staley with Dubin and played a central role in bringing the two sides together. Staley himself later described the Highbridge acquisition as one of the most important transactions of his career.

The financial records made Epstein’s role even harder to dismiss. JPMorgan admitted in litigation that Dubin and Swieca’s holding company paid Epstein’s Financial Trust Company a fee connected to the acquisition, and records showed Highbridge paid Epstein’s company $15 million in December 2004 for “merger and acquisition advice.” That payment placed Epstein directly inside a transaction that materially benefited JPMorgan’s asset-management business and strengthened Staley’s standing at the bank. The Highbridge deal therefore became one of the clearest examples of Epstein delivering real financial value to JPMorgan and the executives who dealt with him, helping explain why his relationship with the bank went far beyond that of an ordinary wealthy client.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75320475Thu, 24 Sep 2026 16:30:03 +0000Bobby CapucciHighbridge Capital Management was a major New York hedge fund founded by Glenn Dubin and Henry Swieca that had grown into one of the most successful alternative-asset managers on Wall Street by the early 2000s. In 2004, JPMorgan Chase acquired a...Highbridge Capital Management was a major New York hedge fund founded by Glenn Dubin and Henry Swieca that had grown into one of the most successful alternative-asset managers on Wall Street by the early 2000s. In 2004, JPMorgan Chase acquired a majority stake in Highbridge, which was managing roughly $7 billion at the time, giving the bank a much larger foothold in the rapidly expanding hedge-fund business. The deal became important to the Epstein story because Jeffrey Epstein was not simply an outside observer. Records from later litigation showed that he helped connect JPMorgan executive Jes Staley with Dubin and played a central role in bringing the two sides together. Staley himself later described the Highbridge acquisition as one of the most important transactions of his career.

The financial records made Epstein’s role even harder to dismiss. JPMorgan admitted in litigation that Dubin and Swieca’s holding company paid Epstein’s Financial Trust Company a fee connected to the acquisition, and records showed Highbridge paid Epstein’s company $15 million in December 2004 for “merger and acquisition advice.” That payment placed Epstein directly inside a transaction that materially benefited JPMorgan’s asset-management business and strengthened Staley’s standing at the bank. The Highbridge deal therefore became one of the clearest examples of Epstein delivering real financial value to JPMorgan and the executives who dealt with him, helping explain why his relationship with the bank went far beyond that of an ordinary wealthy client.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>739epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverupfalsefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/jeffrey-epstein-and-the-highbridge-capital-deal-part-1-9-24-26--75320472Highbridge Capital Management was a major New York hedge fund founded by Glenn Dubin and Henry Swieca that had grown into one of the most successful alternative-asset managers on Wall Street by the early 2000s. In 2004, JPMorgan Chase acquired a majority stake in Highbridge, which was managing roughly $7 billion at the time, giving the bank a much larger foothold in the rapidly expanding hedge-fund business. The deal became important to the Epstein story because Jeffrey Epstein was not simply an outside observer. Records from later litigation showed that he helped connect JPMorgan executive Jes Staley with Dubin and played a central role in bringing the two sides together. Staley himself later described the Highbridge acquisition as one of the most important transactions of his career.

The financial records made Epstein’s role even harder to dismiss. JPMorgan admitted in litigation that Dubin and Swieca’s holding company paid Epstein’s Financial Trust Company a fee connected to the acquisition, and records showed Highbridge paid Epstein’s company $15 million in December 2004 for “merger and acquisition advice.” That payment placed Epstein directly inside a transaction that materially benefited JPMorgan’s asset-management business and strengthened Staley’s standing at the bank. The Highbridge deal therefore became one of the clearest examples of Epstein delivering real financial value to JPMorgan and the executives who dealt with him, helping explain why his relationship with the bank went far beyond that of an ordinary wealthy client.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75320472Thu, 24 Sep 2026 14:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciHighbridge Capital Management was a major New York hedge fund founded by Glenn Dubin and Henry Swieca that had grown into one of the most successful alternative-asset managers on Wall Street by the early 2000s. In 2004, JPMorgan Chase acquired a...Highbridge Capital Management was a major New York hedge fund founded by Glenn Dubin and Henry Swieca that had grown into one of the most successful alternative-asset managers on Wall Street by the early 2000s. In 2004, JPMorgan Chase acquired a majority stake in Highbridge, which was managing roughly $7 billion at the time, giving the bank a much larger foothold in the rapidly expanding hedge-fund business. The deal became important to the Epstein story because Jeffrey Epstein was not simply an outside observer. Records from later litigation showed that he helped connect JPMorgan executive Jes Staley with Dubin and played a central role in bringing the two sides together. Staley himself later described the Highbridge acquisition as one of the most important transactions of his career.

The financial records made Epstein’s role even harder to dismiss. JPMorgan admitted in litigation that Dubin and Swieca’s holding company paid Epstein’s Financial Trust Company a fee connected to the acquisition, and records showed Highbridge paid Epstein’s company $15 million in December 2004 for “merger and acquisition advice.” That payment placed Epstein directly inside a transaction that materially benefited JPMorgan’s asset-management business and strengthened Staley’s standing at the bank. The Highbridge deal therefore became one of the clearest examples of Epstein delivering real financial value to JPMorgan and the executives who dealt with him, helping explain why his relationship with the bank went far beyond that of an ordinary wealthy client.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>724epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/how-ubs-helped-finance-maxwell-s-new-hampshire-hideout-9-24-26--75320473Ghislaine Maxwell bought the secluded 156-acre New Hampshire estate known as “Tucked Away” for about $1.1 million in December 2019, roughly seven months before the FBI arrested her there. Newly released Justice Department records showed that Swiss banking giant UBS transferred nearly $8 million from an account tied to a trust associated with Maxwell shortly before the purchase, with the money then moving through a series of trusts and financial institutions before reaching the entity that bought the property. Maxwell used the alias “Janet Marshall” during the transaction and surrounded herself with private security at the estate as federal investigators closed in.


The timing of UBS’s involvement drew particular scrutiny because the bank processed the transfer after federal investigators had already issued it a grand jury subpoena seeking information about Maxwell’s finances as part of a child sex-trafficking investigation. UBS had also told Maxwell in August 2019 that it intended to end its relationship with her, yet records indicated the bank continued handling substantial assets connected to her as money was moved out. The documents showed UBS had managed as much as roughly $19 million for Maxwell, raising broader questions about how major financial institutions continued servicing figures tied to Epstein even as criminal scrutiny intensified.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

How a Swiss bank helped Epstein accomplice Maxwell buy her hideout, 'Tucked Away,' in NH | Crime | unionleader.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75320473Thu, 24 Sep 2026 12:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciGhislaine Maxwell bought the secluded 156-acre New Hampshire estate known as “Tucked Away” for about $1.1 million in December 2019, roughly seven months before the FBI arrested her there. Newly released Justice Department records showed that Swiss...Ghislaine Maxwell bought the secluded 156-acre New Hampshire estate known as “Tucked Away” for about $1.1 million in December 2019, roughly seven months before the FBI arrested her there. Newly released Justice Department records showed that Swiss banking giant UBS transferred nearly $8 million from an account tied to a trust associated with Maxwell shortly before the purchase, with the money then moving through a series of trusts and financial institutions before reaching the entity that bought the property. Maxwell used the alias “Janet Marshall” during the transaction and surrounded herself with private security at the estate as federal investigators closed in.


The timing of UBS’s involvement drew particular scrutiny because the bank processed the transfer after federal investigators had already issued it a grand jury subpoena seeking information about Maxwell’s finances as part of a child sex-trafficking investigation. UBS had also told Maxwell in August 2019 that it intended to end its relationship with her, yet records indicated the bank continued handling substantial assets connected to her as money was moved out. The documents showed UBS had managed as much as roughly $19 million for Maxwell, raising broader questions about how major financial institutions continued servicing figures tied to Epstein even as criminal scrutiny intensified.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

How a Swiss bank helped Epstein accomplice Maxwell buy her hideout, 'Tucked Away,' in NH | Crime | unionleader.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1061epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-kohberger-and-the-drawn-out-battle-over-his-cover-story-9-24-26--75317588
What could have been a relatively straightforward procedural issue instead turned into a drawn-out legal battle over the scope of the defense theory, the timing of disclosures and what evidence Kohberger would ultimately be allowed to present at trial. The dispute became tied to expert testimony, cell-phone evidence and the defense’s broader effort to account for Kohberger’s movements on the night of the murders. By the time the court addressed the issue through a series of rulings, the alibi fight had already consumed months of litigation, illustrating how even a single defense claim in the case had become the subject of extensive procedural maneuvering before a jury ever heard the evidence.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75317588Thu, 24 Sep 2026 10:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe legal fight over Bryan Kohberger’s alibi became one of the more prolonged pretrial disputes in the Idaho murders case, stretching across multiple filings, deadlines and arguments over exactly what the defense was required to disclose. Prosecutors...
What could have been a relatively straightforward procedural issue instead turned into a drawn-out legal battle over the scope of the defense theory, the timing of disclosures and what evidence Kohberger would ultimately be allowed to present at trial. The dispute became tied to expert testimony, cell-phone evidence and the defense’s broader effort to account for Kohberger’s movements on the night of the murders. By the time the court addressed the issue through a series of rulings, the alibi fight had already consumed months of litigation, illustrating how even a single defense claim in the case had become the subject of extensive procedural maneuvering before a jury ever heard the evidence.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2258bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-the-motion-to-strike-the-notice-of-intent-of-death-penalty-9-24-26--75317586



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

OFFICE OF THE KOOTENAI COUNTY

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75317586Thu, 24 Sep 2026 08:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn the Bryan Kohberger case (CR29-22-2805), Kohberger's defense team has filed a motion to strike the state's intent to seek the death penalty. The defense argues that the prosecution failed to present the aggravating factors to a neutral fact-finder,...



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

OFFICE OF THE KOOTENAI COUNTY

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2474bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-the-order-denying-his-autism-motions-9-24-26--75317587
Hippler also placed limits on how Kohberger’s autism and other neuropsychological evidence could be used before the jury. The defense had sought to introduce expert testimony concerning Kohberger’s autism and related conditions, including to provide context for behavior or courtroom demeanor that jurors might otherwise interpret negatively. The court rejected the broader attempt to use those diagnoses to explain his demeanor, noting that Kohberger had not displayed unusual courtroom behavior requiring such an explanation and warning that the evidence could confuse jurors or improperly introduce mental-condition evidence into the guilt phase. The rulings did not erase Kohberger’s autism diagnosis from the case, but they sharply restricted its role: it could potentially be considered in mitigation if he were convicted, but it could not be transformed into a categorical shield from the death penalty or a general explanation for how jurors should interpret him during trial.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75317587Thu, 24 Sep 2026 06:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJudge Steven Hippler rejected Bryan Kohberger’s effort to use his autism spectrum disorder diagnosis as a basis for removing the death penalty from the case, ruling that the defense had not established that autism should receive the same...
Hippler also placed limits on how Kohberger’s autism and other neuropsychological evidence could be used before the jury. The defense had sought to introduce expert testimony concerning Kohberger’s autism and related conditions, including to provide context for behavior or courtroom demeanor that jurors might otherwise interpret negatively. The court rejected the broader attempt to use those diagnoses to explain his demeanor, noting that Kohberger had not displayed unusual courtroom behavior requiring such an explanation and warning that the evidence could confuse jurors or improperly introduce mental-condition evidence into the guilt phase. The rulings did not erase Kohberger’s autism diagnosis from the case, but they sharply restricted its role: it could potentially be considered in mitigation if he were convicted, but it could not be transformed into a categorical shield from the death penalty or a general explanation for how jurors should interpret him during trial.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2595bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-moscow-police-walk-back-their-initial-comments-about-the-target-of-the-attack--75317590
Days later, Moscow Police tried to clean up the confusion again by saying they had not abandoned the broader belief that the murders were targeted, only that they had not determined what the target was. In a December 5 update, the department said investigators still believed the killings were a targeted attack but had not concluded whether the target was the King Road house or one of its occupants. That distinction was important because early public statements had created the impression that police knew the house itself had been selected in advance, when in reality investigators were still uncertain about whether the killer had chosen the residence, a specific victim, or both.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75317590Thu, 24 Sep 2026 04:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciEarly in the University of Idaho murder investigation, Moscow Police repeatedly described the killings as a “targeted attack,” which led to confusion over exactly what investigators believed had been targeted. The issue became more muddled on November...
Days later, Moscow Police tried to clean up the confusion again by saying they had not abandoned the broader belief that the murders were targeted, only that they had not determined what the target was. In a December 5 update, the department said investigators still believed the killings were a targeted attack but had not concluded whether the target was the King Road house or one of its occupants. That distinction was important because early public statements had created the impression that police knew the house itself had been selected in advance, when in reality investigators were still uncertain about whether the killer had chosen the residence, a specific victim, or both.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1417bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-bryan-kohberger-fails-to-convince-the-court-to-toss-his-indictment--75317589
The ruling was a significant setback for the defense because dismissing the indictment would have forced prosecutors to return to the grand jury or otherwise rebuild the charging process. Instead, the court allowed the case to move forward with the indictment intact, rejecting the defense’s attempt to derail the prosecution before trial. Kohberger’s attorneys were still free to challenge the state’s evidence through suppression motions, expert testimony and other pretrial litigation, but their broader effort to wipe out the indictment itself came up short. The result preserved the prosecution’s basic charging structure and kept the focus on whether the state could prove those charges at trial.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75317589Thu, 24 Sep 2026 02:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBryan Kohberger failed in his effort to have the murder indictment against him dismissed after the court rejected a series of defense arguments challenging the grand jury process and the legal sufficiency of the charges. His attorneys had attacked the...
The ruling was a significant setback for the defense because dismissing the indictment would have forced prosecutors to return to the grand jury or otherwise rebuild the charging process. Instead, the court allowed the case to move forward with the indictment intact, rejecting the defense’s attempt to derail the prosecution before trial. Kohberger’s attorneys were still free to challenge the state’s evidence through suppression motions, expert testimony and other pretrial litigation, but their broader effort to wipe out the indictment itself came up short. The result preserved the prosecution’s basic charging structure and kept the focus on whether the state could prove those charges at trial.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>671epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcripts-day-2-part-9-9-23-26--75316928
The defense spent much of the day attacking how strongly the forensic evidence could actually be interpreted. FBI forensic examiner Amanda Bakker was questioned for roughly three hours as defense attorney Michael Burt dug into the technical details of the DNA testing, mixtures, statistical interpretation and the limitations of what the results could establish about when or how DNA was deposited on the objects. Robinson’s lawyers also pushed back against the State’s motive theory, challenging the attempt to characterize the killing as being driven by Kirk’s religious beliefs in addition to political disagreement. By the end of day two, prosecutors had added important physical evidence to the surveillance case presented on day one, but the defense had begun laying out the approach it would use throughout the hearing: concede that certain items contained Robinson-associated evidence while aggressively challenging what that evidence actually proved about possession, timing, motive and the circumstances of Kirk’s killing.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75316928Thu, 24 Sep 2026 00:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay two of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing focused heavily on prosecutors’ effort to connect Robinson to the Utah Valley University campus and to the physical evidence recovered after Charlie Kirk was shot. Investigators introduced additional...
The defense spent much of the day attacking how strongly the forensic evidence could actually be interpreted. FBI forensic examiner Amanda Bakker was questioned for roughly three hours as defense attorney Michael Burt dug into the technical details of the DNA testing, mixtures, statistical interpretation and the limitations of what the results could establish about when or how DNA was deposited on the objects. Robinson’s lawyers also pushed back against the State’s motive theory, challenging the attempt to characterize the killing as being driven by Kirk’s religious beliefs in addition to political disagreement. By the end of day two, prosecutors had added important physical evidence to the surveillance case presented on day one, but the defense had begun laying out the approach it would use throughout the hearing: concede that certain items contained Robinson-associated evidence while aggressively challenging what that evidence actually proved about possession, timing, motive and the circumstances of Kirk’s killing.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>998breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/katie-phang-and-her-opposition-to-todd-blanche-motion-for-a-stay-part-2-9-23-26--75305384
The filing also accuses Blanche of using successive motions and appeals to introduce arguments he did not make when the preliminary injunction was originally litigated. Phang’s attorneys argue that DOJ has not shown any irreparable harm from having to review records and comply with the law, while continued delay harms Phang’s work as a journalist and frustrates the public interest in disclosure of Epstein-related material. They also challenge DOJ’s position that FOIA is the proper mechanism for obtaining the records, noting that the government has simultaneously told FOIA requesters that the Epstein Files Transparency Act is the controlling avenue for release. Phang ultimately asks Judge Emmet Sullivan to deny the partial stay and leave the September 24 compliance deadline in place, arguing that Blanche has had months to address the foreign-language records and should not now be allowed to postpone the obligation through a late appeal.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.291779.47.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75305384Wed, 23 Sep 2026 22:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciKatie Phang is opposing Attorney General Todd Blanche’s request to partially stay a September 16 enforcement order requiring the Justice Department to begin reviewing and producing foreign-language materials potentially covered by the Epstein Files...
The filing also accuses Blanche of using successive motions and appeals to introduce arguments he did not make when the preliminary injunction was originally litigated. Phang’s attorneys argue that DOJ has not shown any irreparable harm from having to review records and comply with the law, while continued delay harms Phang’s work as a journalist and frustrates the public interest in disclosure of Epstein-related material. They also challenge DOJ’s position that FOIA is the proper mechanism for obtaining the records, noting that the government has simultaneously told FOIA requesters that the Epstein Files Transparency Act is the controlling avenue for release. Phang ultimately asks Judge Emmet Sullivan to deny the partial stay and leave the September 24 compliance deadline in place, arguing that Blanche has had months to address the foreign-language records and should not now be allowed to postpone the obligation through a late appeal.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.291779.47.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>655epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/katie-phang-and-her-opposition-to-todd-blanche-motion-for-a-stay-part-1-9-23-26--75305382
The filing also accuses Blanche of using successive motions and appeals to introduce arguments he did not make when the preliminary injunction was originally litigated. Phang’s attorneys argue that DOJ has not shown any irreparable harm from having to review records and comply with the law, while continued delay harms Phang’s work as a journalist and frustrates the public interest in disclosure of Epstein-related material. They also challenge DOJ’s position that FOIA is the proper mechanism for obtaining the records, noting that the government has simultaneously told FOIA requesters that the Epstein Files Transparency Act is the controlling avenue for release. Phang ultimately asks Judge Emmet Sullivan to deny the partial stay and leave the September 24 compliance deadline in place, arguing that Blanche has had months to address the foreign-language records and should not now be allowed to postpone the obligation through a late appeal.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.291779.47.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75305382Wed, 23 Sep 2026 20:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciKatie Phang is opposing Attorney General Todd Blanche’s request to partially stay a September 16 enforcement order requiring the Justice Department to begin reviewing and producing foreign-language materials potentially covered by the Epstein Files...
The filing also accuses Blanche of using successive motions and appeals to introduce arguments he did not make when the preliminary injunction was originally litigated. Phang’s attorneys argue that DOJ has not shown any irreparable harm from having to review records and comply with the law, while continued delay harms Phang’s work as a journalist and frustrates the public interest in disclosure of Epstein-related material. They also challenge DOJ’s position that FOIA is the proper mechanism for obtaining the records, noting that the government has simultaneously told FOIA requesters that the Epstein Files Transparency Act is the controlling avenue for release. Phang ultimately asks Judge Emmet Sullivan to deny the partial stay and leave the September 24 compliance deadline in place, arguing that Blanche has had months to address the foreign-language records and should not now be allowed to postpone the obligation through a late appeal.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.291779.47.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>762epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/bryan-kohberger-says-he-was-pressured-into-a-plea-he-did-not-fully-understand-9-23-26--75316927
The filing adds another layer to Kohberger’s attempt to undo the plea agreement and force the case back into litigation. Kohberger has argued that he was given false information and convinced to confess, while his family has publicly supported his effort to overturn the convictions and seek a trial. He has also sought a new judge and a change in venue for the post-conviction proceedings. A hearing on those requests was scheduled for October 15, 2026, with a broader post-conviction hearing set for June 17, 2027, meaning the newly unsealed concerns about his understanding of the plea could become central to his effort to have the convictions thrown out.






to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Bryan Kohberger didn't understand what he was doing when he pleaded guilty: unsealed memo

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75316927Wed, 23 Sep 2026 18:30:05 +0000Bobby CapucciAn unsealed defense memo raised questions about whether Bryan Kohberger fully understood the consequences of pleading guilty to the murders of Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. According to the filing, members of...
The filing adds another layer to Kohberger’s attempt to undo the plea agreement and force the case back into litigation. Kohberger has argued that he was given false information and convinced to confess, while his family has publicly supported his effort to overturn the convictions and seek a trial. He has also sought a new judge and a change in venue for the post-conviction proceedings. A hearing on those requests was scheduled for October 15, 2026, with a broader post-conviction hearing set for June 17, 2027, meaning the newly unsealed concerns about his understanding of the plea could become central to his effort to have the convictions thrown out.






to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Bryan Kohberger didn't understand what he was doing when he pleaded guilty: unsealed memo

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>654bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/jeffrey-epstein-and-the-early-bitcoin-power-network-part-2-9-23-26--75305383
The records also reveal that Epstein viewed cryptocurrency as more than an investment opportunity and apparently saw it as a potential instrument of geopolitical influence. In 2013, correspondence involving former Norwegian prime minister Thorbjørn Jagland discussed the possibility of presenting Russian President Vladimir Putin with a proposal involving cryptocurrency and attracting investment to Russia; Epstein’s calendar subsequently included an entry to prepare a “Putin Paper.” There is no public evidence that Epstein ultimately met Putin to deliver the proposal, but the episode adds another layer to the increasingly documented picture of Epstein operating simultaneously across finance, technology and international political circles. Taken together, the records show that Epstein was not simply observing the early cryptocurrency boom from the sidelines: he was investing in it, introducing people within it and attempting to place himself at the intersection of digital finance and global power.

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


Epstein’s secret crypto ties include Trump ally, Putin pitch | Miami Herald

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75305383Wed, 23 Sep 2026 16:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciNewly released records show that Jeffrey Epstein cultivated a surprisingly deep relationship with the emerging cryptocurrency world years after his 2008 conviction, positioning himself as an investor, connector and adviser while Bitcoin and other...
The records also reveal that Epstein viewed cryptocurrency as more than an investment opportunity and apparently saw it as a potential instrument of geopolitical influence. In 2013, correspondence involving former Norwegian prime minister Thorbjørn Jagland discussed the possibility of presenting Russian President Vladimir Putin with a proposal involving cryptocurrency and attracting investment to Russia; Epstein’s calendar subsequently included an entry to prepare a “Putin Paper.” There is no public evidence that Epstein ultimately met Putin to deliver the proposal, but the episode adds another layer to the increasingly documented picture of Epstein operating simultaneously across finance, technology and international political circles. Taken together, the records show that Epstein was not simply observing the early cryptocurrency boom from the sidelines: he was investing in it, introducing people within it and attempting to place himself at the intersection of digital finance and global power.

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


Epstein’s secret crypto ties include Trump ally, Putin pitch | Miami Herald

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>778epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/jeffrey-epstein-and-the-early-bitcoin-power-network-part-1-9-22-26--75305381
The records also reveal that Epstein viewed cryptocurrency as more than an investment opportunity and apparently saw it as a potential instrument of geopolitical influence. In 2013, correspondence involving former Norwegian prime minister Thorbjørn Jagland discussed the possibility of presenting Russian President Vladimir Putin with a proposal involving cryptocurrency and attracting investment to Russia; Epstein’s calendar subsequently included an entry to prepare a “Putin Paper.” There is no public evidence that Epstein ultimately met Putin to deliver the proposal, but the episode adds another layer to the increasingly documented picture of Epstein operating simultaneously across finance, technology and international political circles. Taken together, the records show that Epstein was not simply observing the early cryptocurrency boom from the sidelines: he was investing in it, introducing people within it and attempting to place himself at the intersection of digital finance and global power.

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


Epstein’s secret crypto ties include Trump ally, Putin pitch | Miami Herald

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75305381Wed, 23 Sep 2026 14:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciNewly released records show that Jeffrey Epstein cultivated a surprisingly deep relationship with the emerging cryptocurrency world years after his 2008 conviction, positioning himself as an investor, connector and adviser while Bitcoin and other...
The records also reveal that Epstein viewed cryptocurrency as more than an investment opportunity and apparently saw it as a potential instrument of geopolitical influence. In 2013, correspondence involving former Norwegian prime minister Thorbjørn Jagland discussed the possibility of presenting Russian President Vladimir Putin with a proposal involving cryptocurrency and attracting investment to Russia; Epstein’s calendar subsequently included an entry to prepare a “Putin Paper.” There is no public evidence that Epstein ultimately met Putin to deliver the proposal, but the episode adds another layer to the increasingly documented picture of Epstein operating simultaneously across finance, technology and international political circles. Taken together, the records show that Epstein was not simply observing the early cryptocurrency boom from the sidelines: he was investing in it, introducing people within it and attempting to place himself at the intersection of digital finance and global power.

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


Epstein’s secret crypto ties include Trump ally, Putin pitch | Miami Herald

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>713epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-financial-cost-of-surviving-jeffrey-epstein-9-23-26--75305385Epstein survivors say the financial consequences of the abuse have continued long after their encounters with Jeffrey Epstein ended, affecting their ability to work, obtain medical treatment and maintain financial stability. Survivors described paying significant out-of-pocket costs for therapy, physical rehabilitation and other health care while also losing income because of trauma, advocacy work or difficulty finding employment after publicly identifying themselves with the case. Some received compensation through Epstein-related settlements or mental-health funds, but the amounts varied widely, and survivors said those payments did not necessarily cover years of medical expenses, lost wages and disrupted careers.

The financial strain has prompted Democratic lawmakers Ayanna Pressley, Teresa Leger Fernández and Deborah Ross to introduce the Survivors’ Rights Restitution Act, which would create a federal restitution fund for survivors of sexual violence whose rights were violated by the government, including victims of Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Supporters argue that the long-term economic damage from sexual abuse is frequently overlooked, particularly when survivors lose years of earnings or must continue paying for specialized medical and psychological care. For many Epstein survivors, the renewed push for accountability has also carried additional costs, as some have taken time away from work and paid their own travel and related expenses to participate in congressional hearings, press conferences and other advocacy efforts.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75305385Wed, 23 Sep 2026 12:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciEpstein survivors say the financial consequences of the abuse have continued long after their encounters with Jeffrey Epstein ended, affecting their ability to work, obtain medical treatment and maintain financial stability. Survivors described paying...Epstein survivors say the financial consequences of the abuse have continued long after their encounters with Jeffrey Epstein ended, affecting their ability to work, obtain medical treatment and maintain financial stability. Survivors described paying significant out-of-pocket costs for therapy, physical rehabilitation and other health care while also losing income because of trauma, advocacy work or difficulty finding employment after publicly identifying themselves with the case. Some received compensation through Epstein-related settlements or mental-health funds, but the amounts varied widely, and survivors said those payments did not necessarily cover years of medical expenses, lost wages and disrupted careers.

The financial strain has prompted Democratic lawmakers Ayanna Pressley, Teresa Leger Fernández and Deborah Ross to introduce the Survivors’ Rights Restitution Act, which would create a federal restitution fund for survivors of sexual violence whose rights were violated by the government, including victims of Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Supporters argue that the long-term economic damage from sexual abuse is frequently overlooked, particularly when survivors lose years of earnings or must continue paying for specialized medical and psychological care. For many Epstein survivors, the renewed push for accountability has also carried additional costs, as some have taken time away from work and paid their own travel and related expenses to participate in congressional hearings, press conferences and other advocacy efforts.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>989epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-the-trial-that-never-came-part-4-6-9-23-26--75301342
As of April 2025, Kohberger’s case is still moving through the pretrial phase. His defense has pursued multiple motions challenging evidence collection, including arguments over cellphone pings, surveillance footage, and the genealogical tracing used to identify him as a suspect. The trial has faced delays due to defense requests for more time and the complexities of handling large volumes of digital and forensic evidence. Prosecutors are seeking the death penalty, emphasizing the heinous nature of the crime and the calculated planning involved. Judge John Judge continues to rule on motions in limine, including what evidence will be allowed at trial. The case remains one of the most closely watched in the nation, with both legal teams preparing for what is expected to be a high-profile and emotionally charged trial, now tentatively slated to begin later in 2025.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75301342Wed, 23 Sep 2026 10:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn the early hours of November 13, 2022, four University of Idaho students—Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin—were brutally stabbed to death in a rental house near campus in Moscow, Idaho. The crime scene was particularly...
As of April 2025, Kohberger’s case is still moving through the pretrial phase. His defense has pursued multiple motions challenging evidence collection, including arguments over cellphone pings, surveillance footage, and the genealogical tracing used to identify him as a suspect. The trial has faced delays due to defense requests for more time and the complexities of handling large volumes of digital and forensic evidence. Prosecutors are seeking the death penalty, emphasizing the heinous nature of the crime and the calculated planning involved. Judge John Judge continues to rule on motions in limine, including what evidence will be allowed at trial. The case remains one of the most closely watched in the nation, with both legal teams preparing for what is expected to be a high-profile and emotionally charged trial, now tentatively slated to begin later in 2025.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2030bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-the-trial-that-never-came-part-1-3-9-23-26--75301340
As of April 2025, Kohberger’s case is still moving through the pretrial phase. His defense has pursued multiple motions challenging evidence collection, including arguments over cellphone pings, surveillance footage, and the genealogical tracing used to identify him as a suspect. The trial has faced delays due to defense requests for more time and the complexities of handling large volumes of digital and forensic evidence. Prosecutors are seeking the death penalty, emphasizing the heinous nature of the crime and the calculated planning involved. Judge John Judge continues to rule on motions in limine, including what evidence will be allowed at trial. The case remains one of the most closely watched in the nation, with both legal teams preparing for what is expected to be a high-profile and emotionally charged trial, now tentatively slated to begin later in 2025.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75301340Wed, 23 Sep 2026 08:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn the early hours of November 13, 2022, four University of Idaho students—Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin—were brutally stabbed to death in a rental house near campus in Moscow, Idaho. The crime scene was particularly...
As of April 2025, Kohberger’s case is still moving through the pretrial phase. His defense has pursued multiple motions challenging evidence collection, including arguments over cellphone pings, surveillance footage, and the genealogical tracing used to identify him as a suspect. The trial has faced delays due to defense requests for more time and the complexities of handling large volumes of digital and forensic evidence. Prosecutors are seeking the death penalty, emphasizing the heinous nature of the crime and the calculated planning involved. Judge John Judge continues to rule on motions in limine, including what evidence will be allowed at trial. The case remains one of the most closely watched in the nation, with both legal teams preparing for what is expected to be a high-profile and emotionally charged trial, now tentatively slated to begin later in 2025.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2258bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-kohberger-and-the-state-trade-motions-over-alleged-grand-jury-misconduct-9-23-26--75303090Bryan Kohberger’s defense asked the court to dismiss the indictment against him by attacking the way the grand jury proceedings were handled, arguing that prosecutors had presented the case in a manner that deprived him of a fair and lawful charging process. The defense raised multiple complaints about the evidence and instructions given to grand jurors, including claims that prosecutors had presented inadmissible or misleading material, failed to properly explain the legal standards the jurors were supposed to apply and allowed the grand jury to return an indictment without an adequate showing of probable cause. Kohberger’s attorneys argued that the cumulative effect of those alleged defects was serious enough that the indictment should be thrown out rather than simply allowed to stand.

Prosecutors rejected that argument and told the court that the grand jury process had complied with Idaho law. The state maintained that the evidence presented was sufficient to establish probable cause for the murder and burglary charges and argued that the defense was trying to impose trial-level evidentiary standards on a grand jury proceeding, where the legal threshold was much lower. Prosecutors also disputed the claim that any alleged irregularities had prejudiced Kohberger or undermined the validity of the indictment, and they urged the judge to deny the motion and allow the case to proceed on the charges already returned by the grand jury.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75303090Wed, 23 Sep 2026 06:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBryan Kohberger’s defense asked the court to dismiss the indictment against him by attacking the way the grand jury proceedings were handled, arguing that prosecutors had presented the case in a manner that deprived him of a fair and lawful charging...Bryan Kohberger’s defense asked the court to dismiss the indictment against him by attacking the way the grand jury proceedings were handled, arguing that prosecutors had presented the case in a manner that deprived him of a fair and lawful charging process. The defense raised multiple complaints about the evidence and instructions given to grand jurors, including claims that prosecutors had presented inadmissible or misleading material, failed to properly explain the legal standards the jurors were supposed to apply and allowed the grand jury to return an indictment without an adequate showing of probable cause. Kohberger’s attorneys argued that the cumulative effect of those alleged defects was serious enough that the indictment should be thrown out rather than simply allowed to stand.

Prosecutors rejected that argument and told the court that the grand jury process had complied with Idaho law. The state maintained that the evidence presented was sufficient to establish probable cause for the murder and burglary charges and argued that the defense was trying to impose trial-level evidentiary standards on a grand jury proceeding, where the legal threshold was much lower. Prosecutors also disputed the claim that any alleged irregularities had prejudiced Kohberger or undermined the validity of the indictment, and they urged the judge to deny the motion and allow the case to proceed on the charges already returned by the grand jury.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3303bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-the-order-to-seal-the-grand-jury-witness-list--75301343In the Kohberger case, the court ordered the grand jury witness list sealed from public view, keeping the identities of the people who testified before the grand jury confidential. The order was consistent with the secrecy that generally surrounds grand jury proceedings, where prosecutors present evidence privately to determine whether there is probable cause to return an indictment. By sealing the witness list, the court prevented the names of those witnesses from becoming part of the publicly accessible case record while the prosecution moved forward against Kohberger.

The sealing order also limited the public’s ability to reconstruct exactly what evidence prosecutors presented to the grand jury before Kohberger was indicted on four counts of first-degree murder and one count of burglary. Although the indictment itself became public, the witness list remained protected, meaning the identities and potential roles of those who appeared before the grand jury were not disclosed through that filing. The order preserved the confidentiality of that stage of the case while later disputes over the grand jury process, the indictment and related records continued to play out in court.












to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com









Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75301343Wed, 23 Sep 2026 04:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn the Kohberger case, the court ordered the grand jury witness list sealed from public view, keeping the identities of the people who testified before the grand jury confidential. The order was consistent with the secrecy that generally surrounds...In the Kohberger case, the court ordered the grand jury witness list sealed from public view, keeping the identities of the people who testified before the grand jury confidential. The order was consistent with the secrecy that generally surrounds grand jury proceedings, where prosecutors present evidence privately to determine whether there is probable cause to return an indictment. By sealing the witness list, the court prevented the names of those witnesses from becoming part of the publicly accessible case record while the prosecution moved forward against Kohberger.

The sealing order also limited the public’s ability to reconstruct exactly what evidence prosecutors presented to the grand jury before Kohberger was indicted on four counts of first-degree murder and one count of burglary. Although the indictment itself became public, the witness list remained protected, meaning the identities and potential roles of those who appeared before the grand jury were not disclosed through that filing. The order preserved the confidentiality of that stage of the case while later disputes over the grand jury process, the indictment and related records continued to play out in court.












to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com









Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>601bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-bryan-kohberger-s-trial-is-delayed-after-he-waives-his-right-to-a-speedy-trial--75301341Bryan Kohberger’s capital murder trial had been indefinitely postponed after he waived his right to a speedy trial less than two months before the proceedings were scheduled to begin. Kohberger had originally been set to go to trial on Oct. 2, 2023, in the killings of University of Idaho students Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. His lead public defender, Anne Taylor, told the court that the defense did not have enough time to adequately prepare for a case involving an enormous amount of evidence and the possibility of the death penalty. Judge John Judge repeatedly confirmed that Kohberger understood the right he was surrendering before accepting the waiver, while Latah County Prosecutor Bill Thompson described the decision as a sensible move given the complexity of the case.


The waiver eliminated the October trial date and made it unlikely that the case would reach a jury before sometime in 2024. Defense attorneys said they wanted the eventual trial date reset only once and indicated that several major issues still had to be resolved, including challenges to the grand jury indictment, efforts to remove the death penalty and disputes over cameras in the courtroom. The delay frustrated members of the victims’ families, particularly the Goncalves family, who said they feared the case could now drag on for years, although they acknowledged that additional time would allow both sides to prepare. All previously established pretrial deadlines were vacated, leaving the timing of the trial dependent in part on how Judge ruled on the defense’s pending motions.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75301341Wed, 23 Sep 2026 02:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBryan Kohberger’s capital murder trial had been indefinitely postponed after he waived his right to a speedy trial less than two months before the proceedings were scheduled to begin. Kohberger had originally been set to go to trial on Oct. 2, 2023,...Bryan Kohberger’s capital murder trial had been indefinitely postponed after he waived his right to a speedy trial less than two months before the proceedings were scheduled to begin. Kohberger had originally been set to go to trial on Oct. 2, 2023, in the killings of University of Idaho students Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. His lead public defender, Anne Taylor, told the court that the defense did not have enough time to adequately prepare for a case involving an enormous amount of evidence and the possibility of the death penalty. Judge John Judge repeatedly confirmed that Kohberger understood the right he was surrendering before accepting the waiver, while Latah County Prosecutor Bill Thompson described the decision as a sensible move given the complexity of the case.


The waiver eliminated the October trial date and made it unlikely that the case would reach a jury before sometime in 2024. Defense attorneys said they wanted the eventual trial date reset only once and indicated that several major issues still had to be resolved, including challenges to the grand jury indictment, efforts to remove the death penalty and disputes over cameras in the courtroom. The delay frustrated members of the victims’ families, particularly the Goncalves family, who said they feared the case could now drag on for years, although they acknowledged that additional time would allow both sides to prepare. All previously established pretrial deadlines were vacated, leaving the timing of the trial dependent in part on how Judge ruled on the defense’s pending motions.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>731bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcripts-day-2-part-8-9-22-26--75298804
The defense spent much of the day attacking how strongly the forensic evidence could actually be interpreted. FBI forensic examiner Amanda Bakker was questioned for roughly three hours as defense attorney Michael Burt dug into the technical details of the DNA testing, mixtures, statistical interpretation and the limitations of what the results could establish about when or how DNA was deposited on the objects. Robinson’s lawyers also pushed back against the State’s motive theory, challenging the attempt to characterize the killing as being driven by Kirk’s religious beliefs in addition to political disagreement. By the end of day two, prosecutors had added important physical evidence to the surveillance case presented on day one, but the defense had begun laying out the approach it would use throughout the hearing: concede that certain items contained Robinson-associated evidence while aggressively challenging what that evidence actually proved about possession, timing, motive and the circumstances of Kirk’s killing.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75298804Wed, 23 Sep 2026 00:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay two of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing focused heavily on prosecutors’ effort to connect Robinson to the Utah Valley University campus and to the physical evidence recovered after Charlie Kirk was shot. Investigators introduced additional...
The defense spent much of the day attacking how strongly the forensic evidence could actually be interpreted. FBI forensic examiner Amanda Bakker was questioned for roughly three hours as defense attorney Michael Burt dug into the technical details of the DNA testing, mixtures, statistical interpretation and the limitations of what the results could establish about when or how DNA was deposited on the objects. Robinson’s lawyers also pushed back against the State’s motive theory, challenging the attempt to characterize the killing as being driven by Kirk’s religious beliefs in addition to political disagreement. By the end of day two, prosecutors had added important physical evidence to the surveillance case presented on day one, but the defense had begun laying out the approach it would use throughout the hearing: concede that certain items contained Robinson-associated evidence while aggressively challenging what that evidence actually proved about possession, timing, motive and the circumstances of Kirk’s killing.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>649breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcripts-day-2-part-7-9-22-26--75298805
The defense spent much of the day attacking how strongly the forensic evidence could actually be interpreted. FBI forensic examiner Amanda Bakker was questioned for roughly three hours as defense attorney Michael Burt dug into the technical details of the DNA testing, mixtures, statistical interpretation and the limitations of what the results could establish about when or how DNA was deposited on the objects. Robinson’s lawyers also pushed back against the State’s motive theory, challenging the attempt to characterize the killing as being driven by Kirk’s religious beliefs in addition to political disagreement. By the end of day two, prosecutors had added important physical evidence to the surveillance case presented on day one, but the defense had begun laying out the approach it would use throughout the hearing: concede that certain items contained Robinson-associated evidence while aggressively challenging what that evidence actually proved about possession, timing, motive and the circumstances of Kirk’s killing.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75298805Tue, 22 Sep 2026 22:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay two of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing focused heavily on prosecutors’ effort to connect Robinson to the Utah Valley University campus and to the physical evidence recovered after Charlie Kirk was shot. Investigators introduced additional...
The defense spent much of the day attacking how strongly the forensic evidence could actually be interpreted. FBI forensic examiner Amanda Bakker was questioned for roughly three hours as defense attorney Michael Burt dug into the technical details of the DNA testing, mixtures, statistical interpretation and the limitations of what the results could establish about when or how DNA was deposited on the objects. Robinson’s lawyers also pushed back against the State’s motive theory, challenging the attempt to characterize the killing as being driven by Kirk’s religious beliefs in addition to political disagreement. By the end of day two, prosecutors had added important physical evidence to the surveillance case presented on day one, but the defense had begun laying out the approach it would use throughout the hearing: concede that certain items contained Robinson-associated evidence while aggressively challenging what that evidence actually proved about possession, timing, motive and the circumstances of Kirk’s killing.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>700breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-usvi-and-their-motion-in-opposition-to-jp-morgan-s-request-for-dismissal-part-4-9-22-26--75283333
The USVI contends that JPMorgan's actions or lack thereof contributed significantly to the harm caused by Epstein and his network. The motion further emphasizes that the lawsuit is valid and should proceed, as it seeks to hold the bank accountable for its alleged complicity in Epstein's activities, despite JPMorgan's efforts to dismiss the case. The USVI aims to prove that the bank's involvement goes beyond mere negligence, arguing that it knowingly benefited from its relationship with Epstein.





to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.591653.48.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75283333Tue, 22 Sep 2026 20:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI) filed a motion opposing JPMorgan Chase's request to dismiss the lawsuit related to Jeffrey Epstein. The USVI argues that JPMorgan played a crucial role in enabling and facilitating Epstein's illegal activities by...
The USVI contends that JPMorgan's actions or lack thereof contributed significantly to the harm caused by Epstein and his network. The motion further emphasizes that the lawsuit is valid and should proceed, as it seeks to hold the bank accountable for its alleged complicity in Epstein's activities, despite JPMorgan's efforts to dismiss the case. The USVI aims to prove that the bank's involvement goes beyond mere negligence, arguing that it knowingly benefited from its relationship with Epstein.





to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.591653.48.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>809epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-usvi-and-their-motion-in-opposition-to-jp-morgan-s-request-for-dismissal-part-3-9-22-26--75283331
The USVI contends that JPMorgan's actions or lack thereof contributed significantly to the harm caused by Epstein and his network. The motion further emphasizes that the lawsuit is valid and should proceed, as it seeks to hold the bank accountable for its alleged complicity in Epstein's activities, despite JPMorgan's efforts to dismiss the case. The USVI aims to prove that the bank's involvement goes beyond mere negligence, arguing that it knowingly benefited from its relationship with Epstein.





to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.591653.48.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75283331Tue, 22 Sep 2026 18:30:05 +0000Bobby CapucciThe U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI) filed a motion opposing JPMorgan Chase's request to dismiss the lawsuit related to Jeffrey Epstein. The USVI argues that JPMorgan played a crucial role in enabling and facilitating Epstein's illegal activities by...
The USVI contends that JPMorgan's actions or lack thereof contributed significantly to the harm caused by Epstein and his network. The motion further emphasizes that the lawsuit is valid and should proceed, as it seeks to hold the bank accountable for its alleged complicity in Epstein's activities, despite JPMorgan's efforts to dismiss the case. The USVI aims to prove that the bank's involvement goes beyond mere negligence, arguing that it knowingly benefited from its relationship with Epstein.





to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.591653.48.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>702epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-epstein-files-hack-the-fbi-never-fully-explained-9-22-26--75289087
The breach raised new questions about how the FBI protected some of the most sensitive evidence in the Epstein investigation and why the full details remained out of public view for years. Spivack said the server had been left remotely accessible amid confusing and conflicting internal IT procedures, and he later argued that the bureau treated him as a scapegoat for what he considered a larger institutional failure. The FBI investigated the episode internally, but it has not publicly explained exactly which Epstein records were accessed, whether sensitive information was removed, whether affected individuals were notified or how much of the missing data could have existed elsewhere in government backups. The newly released material therefore added another major controversy to the handling of the Epstein evidence: a hacker had gained access to an FBI system containing Epstein files, a massive amount of data was lost, and significant questions about the scope and consequences of the breach remained unresolved.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


FBI's Epstein Server Was Hacked on Super Bowl Sunday

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75289087Tue, 22 Sep 2026 16:30:03 +0000Bobby CapucciAccording to newly surfaced FBI records, a foreign hacker penetrated a server used by the FBI’s New York Child Exploitation Forensic Lab on Super Bowl Sunday in February 2023 and accessed material connected to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation....
The breach raised new questions about how the FBI protected some of the most sensitive evidence in the Epstein investigation and why the full details remained out of public view for years. Spivack said the server had been left remotely accessible amid confusing and conflicting internal IT procedures, and he later argued that the bureau treated him as a scapegoat for what he considered a larger institutional failure. The FBI investigated the episode internally, but it has not publicly explained exactly which Epstein records were accessed, whether sensitive information was removed, whether affected individuals were notified or how much of the missing data could have existed elsewhere in government backups. The newly released material therefore added another major controversy to the handling of the Epstein evidence: a hacker had gained access to an FBI system containing Epstein files, a massive amount of data was lost, and significant questions about the scope and consequences of the breach remained unresolved.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


FBI's Epstein Server Was Hacked on Super Bowl Sunday

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>712epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/andrew-keeps-a-low-profile-while-police-review-epstein-connections-9-22-26--75289086Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor was described by friends as effectively “living in limbo” while Thames Valley Police continued investigating allegations tied to his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and his former role as a British trade envoy. Andrew had moved from Royal Lodge to Marsh Farm on the Sandringham Estate after his February 2026 arrest on suspicion of misconduct in public office. Although he had not been charged and faced no formal travel restrictions, friends said he had been advised to keep a low profile and had barely ventured beyond Sandringham. Investigators were examining claims that Andrew may have shared confidential information with Epstein, including details related to diplomatic and trade activity, while also pursuing broader questions about his relationship with Epstein and allegations involving women connected to Epstein’s network.

Despite the uncertainty, friends said Andrew was trying to “make the most” of his new life in Norfolk and even felt some relief at being removed from the Windsor royal bubble. At the same time, the investigation had left him unable to return to anything resembling his former life, with associates saying he could not realistically travel or resume normal public activity while the case remained unresolved. The police inquiry was expected to continue for months, in part because investigators were seeking original documents and other material from U.S. authorities. Andrew continued to deny wrongdoing, but the prolonged investigation meant his future remained uncertain, leaving him isolated at Sandringham while detectives continued examining his dealings with Epstein.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-16145093/Andrew-living-limbo-Epstein-investigation-new-life-Sandringham.html

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75289086Tue, 22 Sep 2026 14:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciAndrew Mountbatten-Windsor was described by friends as effectively “living in limbo” while Thames Valley Police continued investigating allegations tied to his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and his former role as a British trade envoy. Andrew had...Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor was described by friends as effectively “living in limbo” while Thames Valley Police continued investigating allegations tied to his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and his former role as a British trade envoy. Andrew had moved from Royal Lodge to Marsh Farm on the Sandringham Estate after his February 2026 arrest on suspicion of misconduct in public office. Although he had not been charged and faced no formal travel restrictions, friends said he had been advised to keep a low profile and had barely ventured beyond Sandringham. Investigators were examining claims that Andrew may have shared confidential information with Epstein, including details related to diplomatic and trade activity, while also pursuing broader questions about his relationship with Epstein and allegations involving women connected to Epstein’s network.

Despite the uncertainty, friends said Andrew was trying to “make the most” of his new life in Norfolk and even felt some relief at being removed from the Windsor royal bubble. At the same time, the investigation had left him unable to return to anything resembling his former life, with associates saying he could not realistically travel or resume normal public activity while the case remained unresolved. The police inquiry was expected to continue for months, in part because investigators were seeking original documents and other material from U.S. authorities. Andrew continued to deny wrongdoing, but the prolonged investigation meant his future remained uncertain, leaving him isolated at Sandringham while detectives continued examining his dealings with Epstein.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-16145093/Andrew-living-limbo-Epstein-investigation-new-life-Sandringham.html

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>775epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/epstein-files-transparency-act-ii-moves-forward-in-the-house-9-22-26--75289085A second push to force the release of additional Jeffrey Epstein records advanced in the House after Reps. Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna said they had secured enough commitments to bring the Epstein Files Transparency Act II to the floor through another discharge petition. The maneuver closely mirrored the strategy used to pass the original Epstein Files Transparency Act in 2025, when supporters bypassed Speaker Mike Johnson after Republican leadership declined to schedule a vote. The new measure would strengthen enforcement of the existing transparency law by allowing Epstein survivors, state attorneys general and other officials to sue the Justice Department if records were unlawfully withheld, excessively redacted, delayed or concealed. Massie said Republicans Nancy Mace, Ralph Norman and Brian Fitzpatrick had joined him in supporting the petition alongside House Democrats, potentially giving organizers the 218 signatures required to force a vote without leadership’s permission.

The effort reflected growing frustration among lawmakers who argued that the original transparency law had not produced the complete disclosure they expected from the Justice Department. The second bill was designed to give outside parties an enforcement mechanism instead of leaving compliance almost entirely in DOJ’s hands, including expedited court review and access to records needed for state investigations. The discharge petition remained especially significant because it again placed Johnson and House leadership on the sidelines of an Epstein-related vote they had not chosen to bring forward themselves. By mid-September, the petition was nearing the 218-signature threshold, although the House’s early departure from Washington temporarily slowed the effort. The broader fight had therefore shifted from simply ordering the government to release Epstein records to creating legal consequences when lawmakers, survivors or state authorities believed the government was still improperly withholding them.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Epstein Files Transparency Act sequel advances as House goes around Johnson again

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75289085Tue, 22 Sep 2026 12:30:03 +0000Bobby CapucciA second push to force the release of additional Jeffrey Epstein records advanced in the House after Reps. Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna said they had secured enough commitments to bring the Epstein Files Transparency Act II to the floor through another...A second push to force the release of additional Jeffrey Epstein records advanced in the House after Reps. Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna said they had secured enough commitments to bring the Epstein Files Transparency Act II to the floor through another discharge petition. The maneuver closely mirrored the strategy used to pass the original Epstein Files Transparency Act in 2025, when supporters bypassed Speaker Mike Johnson after Republican leadership declined to schedule a vote. The new measure would strengthen enforcement of the existing transparency law by allowing Epstein survivors, state attorneys general and other officials to sue the Justice Department if records were unlawfully withheld, excessively redacted, delayed or concealed. Massie said Republicans Nancy Mace, Ralph Norman and Brian Fitzpatrick had joined him in supporting the petition alongside House Democrats, potentially giving organizers the 218 signatures required to force a vote without leadership’s permission.

The effort reflected growing frustration among lawmakers who argued that the original transparency law had not produced the complete disclosure they expected from the Justice Department. The second bill was designed to give outside parties an enforcement mechanism instead of leaving compliance almost entirely in DOJ’s hands, including expedited court review and access to records needed for state investigations. The discharge petition remained especially significant because it again placed Johnson and House leadership on the sidelines of an Epstein-related vote they had not chosen to bring forward themselves. By mid-September, the petition was nearing the 218-signature threshold, although the House’s early departure from Washington temporarily slowed the effort. The broader fight had therefore shifted from simply ordering the government to release Epstein records to creating legal consequences when lawmakers, survivors or state authorities believed the government was still improperly withholding them.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Epstein Files Transparency Act sequel advances as House goes around Johnson again

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>701epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-prosecutors-say-that-bryan-kohberger-purchased-a-ka-bar-knife-9-22-26--75284030

The defense has filed motions to exclude Kohberger's Amazon purchase history and the "bushy eyebrows" description from trial, arguing that such evidence is prejudicial and could deny him a fair trial. Despite these efforts, the prosecution maintains that the Amazon purchase history is relevant, as it shows Kohberger's acquisition of a knife matching the sheath found at the crime scene. The trial is scheduled to begin on August 11, 2025, with prosecutors indicating their intent to seek the death penalty if Kohberger is convicted.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Idaho prosecutors: Kohberger bought Ka-Bar knife, sheath | Idaho Statesman

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75284030Tue, 22 Sep 2026 10:30:02 +0000Bobby Capucci​Prosecutors in the Bryan Kohberger case have introduced evidence indicating that Kohberger purchased a Ka-Bar knife, along with a sheath and sharpener, from Amazon between March 20 and March 30, 2022—approximately eight months prior to the November...

The defense has filed motions to exclude Kohberger's Amazon purchase history and the "bushy eyebrows" description from trial, arguing that such evidence is prejudicial and could deny him a fair trial. Despite these efforts, the prosecution maintains that the Amazon purchase history is relevant, as it shows Kohberger's acquisition of a knife matching the sheath found at the crime scene. The trial is scheduled to begin on August 11, 2025, with prosecutors indicating their intent to seek the death penalty if Kohberger is convicted.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Idaho prosecutors: Kohberger bought Ka-Bar knife, sheath | Idaho Statesman

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2287bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-the-warrants-regarding-the-ka-bar-knife-9-22-26--75284031
The warrant served on Blue Ridge Knives sought records for all KA1217S sheath sales and traced two large Ka-Bar shipments the wholesaler received in 2022, including orders for 360 knives in March and 480 in June. Investigators requested descriptions of the items, purchaser and shipping information, payment histories and correspondence connected to those sales. The Ka-Bar company warrant extended beyond the 1217 knife and matching sheath, seeking buyers of five additional knife models as well as records of shipments to Blue Ridge Knives. All six warrants were approved, served and returned before Bryan Kohberger’s arrest, showing that investigators were attempting to trace the knife and sheath through manufacturers, wholesalers and national retailers long before the murder weapon itself was recovered.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75284031Tue, 22 Sep 2026 08:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciMoscow investigators filed more than 60 search-warrant applications during the investigation, including six that focused specifically on locating the Ka-Bar-style knife believed to have been used in the murders. The warrants were directed to Amazon,...
The warrant served on Blue Ridge Knives sought records for all KA1217S sheath sales and traced two large Ka-Bar shipments the wholesaler received in 2022, including orders for 360 knives in March and 480 in June. Investigators requested descriptions of the items, purchaser and shipping information, payment histories and correspondence connected to those sales. The Ka-Bar company warrant extended beyond the 1217 knife and matching sheath, seeking buyers of five additional knife models as well as records of shipments to Blue Ridge Knives. All six warrants were approved, served and returned before Bryan Kohberger’s arrest, showing that investigators were attempting to trace the knife and sheath through manufacturers, wholesalers and national retailers long before the murder weapon itself was recovered.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3045bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-the-questions-that-remained-even-after-the-arrest-9-21-26--75284029
The affidavit created additional questions about Kohberger’s movements before and after the killings. Investigators said his vehicle repeatedly circled the neighborhood before the attack, his phone stopped connecting to the network during the critical period, and records placed the phone near the victims’ neighborhood on at least 12 earlier occasions, but the purpose of those visits remained unexplained. It was also unclear why he allegedly returned to the area later that morning, whether investigators had found additional evidence in his apartment or vehicle and how the surviving roommate’s encounter with the masked intruder fit with the lengthy delay before anyone called 911. The affidavit established probable cause for an arrest, but it left the motive, victim selection and full story of what happened inside the house unresolved.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75284029Tue, 22 Sep 2026 06:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe probable-cause affidavit explained why investigators arrested Bryan Kohberger, but it did not explain why they believed he targeted 1122 King Road or the four students inside. It connected Kohberger to the case through DNA recovered from a knife...
The affidavit created additional questions about Kohberger’s movements before and after the killings. Investigators said his vehicle repeatedly circled the neighborhood before the attack, his phone stopped connecting to the network during the critical period, and records placed the phone near the victims’ neighborhood on at least 12 earlier occasions, but the purpose of those visits remained unexplained. It was also unclear why he allegedly returned to the area later that morning, whether investigators had found additional evidence in his apartment or vehicle and how the surviving roommate’s encounter with the masked intruder fit with the lengthy delay before anyone called 911. The affidavit established probable cause for an arrest, but it left the motive, victim selection and full story of what happened inside the house unresolved.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2592bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-how-did-bryan-kohberger-enter-the-home-at-1122-king-road--75284041
Other theories focused on the keypad-controlled front door and an unconfirmed account that a neighbor saw it standing open several hours after the killings. The absence of broken windows or damaged locks led many observers to believe the killer either found an unsecured entrance, knew the access code or had previously learned the home’s layout. Police withheld a definitive answer at the time, leaving the sliding-door theory as the leading but initially unconfirmed explanation. Later evidence established that Bryan Kohberger entered and exited through the second-floor sliding glass door, confirming the route that drew scrutiny from the investigation’s earliest days.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75284041Tue, 22 Sep 2026 04:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDuring the early stages of the Moscow murder investigation, authorities said there were no obvious signs of forced entry at 1122 King Road but did not publicly identify how the killer entered. Attention quickly centered on the sliding glass door...
Other theories focused on the keypad-controlled front door and an unconfirmed account that a neighbor saw it standing open several hours after the killings. The absence of broken windows or damaged locks led many observers to believe the killer either found an unsecured entrance, knew the access code or had previously learned the home’s layout. Police withheld a definitive answer at the time, leaving the sliding-door theory as the leading but initially unconfirmed explanation. Later evidence established that Bryan Kohberger entered and exited through the second-floor sliding glass door, confirming the route that drew scrutiny from the investigation’s earliest days.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>659epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-an-fbi-profiler-gives-his-thoughts-on-the-murders--75284040

Clemente said the choice of a knife suggested the killer wanted a quiet weapon or regularly carried and displayed one to others. The offender’s willingness to stab four people, including a male victim, and continue after encountering resistance suggested to Clemente that he was comfortable with blood and might have possessed experience as a hunter, butcher or in a similar activity. He advised investigators to look for someone who had been fixated on a victim, showed unusual pride in a knife, left the area after the murders, missed work or arrived late, and followed news coverage of the investigation obsessively. These remained Clemente’s behavioral theories during the unsolved stage of the case, not findings announced by investigators.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com





Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75284040Tue, 22 Sep 2026 02:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciNine days after four University of Idaho students were murdered, former FBI profiler Jim Clemente described the unidentified killer as likely being a young man close to the victims’ age who had little criminal or forensic sophistication and probably...

Clemente said the choice of a knife suggested the killer wanted a quiet weapon or regularly carried and displayed one to others. The offender’s willingness to stab four people, including a male victim, and continue after encountering resistance suggested to Clemente that he was comfortable with blood and might have possessed experience as a hunter, butcher or in a similar activity. He advised investigators to look for someone who had been fixated on a victim, showed unusual pride in a knife, left the area after the murders, missed work or arrived late, and followed news coverage of the investigation obsessively. These remained Clemente’s behavioral theories during the unsolved stage of the case, not findings announced by investigators.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com





Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>877bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcripts-day-2-part-6-9-21-26--75283347
The defense spent much of the day attacking how strongly the forensic evidence could actually be interpreted. FBI forensic examiner Amanda Bakker was questioned for roughly three hours as defense attorney Michael Burt dug into the technical details of the DNA testing, mixtures, statistical interpretation and the limitations of what the results could establish about when or how DNA was deposited on the objects. Robinson’s lawyers also pushed back against the State’s motive theory, challenging the attempt to characterize the killing as being driven by Kirk’s religious beliefs in addition to political disagreement. By the end of day two, prosecutors had added important physical evidence to the surveillance case presented on day one, but the defense had begun laying out the approach it would use throughout the hearing: concede that certain items contained Robinson-associated evidence while aggressively challenging what that evidence actually proved about possession, timing, motive and the circumstances of Kirk’s killing.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75283347Tue, 22 Sep 2026 00:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay two of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing focused heavily on prosecutors’ effort to connect Robinson to the Utah Valley University campus and to the physical evidence recovered after Charlie Kirk was shot. Investigators introduced additional...
The defense spent much of the day attacking how strongly the forensic evidence could actually be interpreted. FBI forensic examiner Amanda Bakker was questioned for roughly three hours as defense attorney Michael Burt dug into the technical details of the DNA testing, mixtures, statistical interpretation and the limitations of what the results could establish about when or how DNA was deposited on the objects. Robinson’s lawyers also pushed back against the State’s motive theory, challenging the attempt to characterize the killing as being driven by Kirk’s religious beliefs in addition to political disagreement. By the end of day two, prosecutors had added important physical evidence to the surveillance case presented on day one, but the defense had begun laying out the approach it would use throughout the hearing: concede that certain items contained Robinson-associated evidence while aggressively challenging what that evidence actually proved about possession, timing, motive and the circumstances of Kirk’s killing.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>709breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcripts-day-2-part-5-9-21-26--75283346
The defense spent much of the day attacking how strongly the forensic evidence could actually be interpreted. FBI forensic examiner Amanda Bakker was questioned for roughly three hours as defense attorney Michael Burt dug into the technical details of the DNA testing, mixtures, statistical interpretation and the limitations of what the results could establish about when or how DNA was deposited on the objects. Robinson’s lawyers also pushed back against the State’s motive theory, challenging the attempt to characterize the killing as being driven by Kirk’s religious beliefs in addition to political disagreement. By the end of day two, prosecutors had added important physical evidence to the surveillance case presented on day one, but the defense had begun laying out the approach it would use throughout the hearing: concede that certain items contained Robinson-associated evidence while aggressively challenging what that evidence actually proved about possession, timing, motive and the circumstances of Kirk’s killing.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75283346Mon, 21 Sep 2026 22:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay two of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing focused heavily on prosecutors’ effort to connect Robinson to the Utah Valley University campus and to the physical evidence recovered after Charlie Kirk was shot. Investigators introduced additional...
The defense spent much of the day attacking how strongly the forensic evidence could actually be interpreted. FBI forensic examiner Amanda Bakker was questioned for roughly three hours as defense attorney Michael Burt dug into the technical details of the DNA testing, mixtures, statistical interpretation and the limitations of what the results could establish about when or how DNA was deposited on the objects. Robinson’s lawyers also pushed back against the State’s motive theory, challenging the attempt to characterize the killing as being driven by Kirk’s religious beliefs in addition to political disagreement. By the end of day two, prosecutors had added important physical evidence to the surveillance case presented on day one, but the defense had begun laying out the approach it would use throughout the hearing: concede that certain items contained Robinson-associated evidence while aggressively challenging what that evidence actually proved about possession, timing, motive and the circumstances of Kirk’s killing.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>704breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-usvi-and-their-motion-in-opposition-to-jp-morgan-s-request-for-dismissal-part-2-9-21-26--75283332
The USVI contends that JPMorgan's actions or lack thereof contributed significantly to the harm caused by Epstein and his network. The motion further emphasizes that the lawsuit is valid and should proceed, as it seeks to hold the bank accountable for its alleged complicity in Epstein's activities, despite JPMorgan's efforts to dismiss the case. The USVI aims to prove that the bank's involvement goes beyond mere negligence, arguing that it knowingly benefited from its relationship with Epstein.





to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.591653.48.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75283332Mon, 21 Sep 2026 20:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI) filed a motion opposing JPMorgan Chase's request to dismiss the lawsuit related to Jeffrey Epstein. The USVI argues that JPMorgan played a crucial role in enabling and facilitating Epstein's illegal activities by...
The USVI contends that JPMorgan's actions or lack thereof contributed significantly to the harm caused by Epstein and his network. The motion further emphasizes that the lawsuit is valid and should proceed, as it seeks to hold the bank accountable for its alleged complicity in Epstein's activities, despite JPMorgan's efforts to dismiss the case. The USVI aims to prove that the bank's involvement goes beyond mere negligence, arguing that it knowingly benefited from its relationship with Epstein.





to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.591653.48.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>691epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-usvi-and-their-motion-in-opposition-to-jp-morgan-s-request-for-dismissal-part-1-9-21-26--75283330
The USVI contends that JPMorgan's actions or lack thereof contributed significantly to the harm caused by Epstein and his network. The motion further emphasizes that the lawsuit is valid and should proceed, as it seeks to hold the bank accountable for its alleged complicity in Epstein's activities, despite JPMorgan's efforts to dismiss the case. The USVI aims to prove that the bank's involvement goes beyond mere negligence, arguing that it knowingly benefited from its relationship with Epstein.





to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.591653.48.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75283330Mon, 21 Sep 2026 18:30:03 +0000Bobby CapucciThe U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI) filed a motion opposing JPMorgan Chase's request to dismiss the lawsuit related to Jeffrey Epstein. The USVI argues that JPMorgan played a crucial role in enabling and facilitating Epstein's illegal activities by...
The USVI contends that JPMorgan's actions or lack thereof contributed significantly to the harm caused by Epstein and his network. The motion further emphasizes that the lawsuit is valid and should proceed, as it seeks to hold the bank accountable for its alleged complicity in Epstein's activities, despite JPMorgan's efforts to dismiss the case. The USVI aims to prove that the bank's involvement goes beyond mere negligence, arguing that it knowingly benefited from its relationship with Epstein.





to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.591653.48.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>648epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/inside-the-crimes-of-serial-killer-israel-keyes-9-21-26--75283311
After his arrest, Keyes told the FBI that he had killed multiple people over many years and claimed his murders stretched across several states, but he was deliberately evasive about names, locations and victim totals. Investigators believed he was responsible for at least 11 murders, although only three victims were conclusively identified, and he was examined in connection with numerous unsolved disappearances and homicides across the country. Keyes described choosing victims opportunistically and said he sometimes traveled specifically to kill, making geographic profiling unusually difficult. He died by suicide in an Alaska jail in December 2012 before he could be tried for most of the crimes he confessed to, leaving investigators with a disturbing combination of confirmed murders, partial confessions and unresolved questions about how many victims he actually had.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75283311Mon, 21 Sep 2026 16:30:07 +0000Bobby CapucciIsrael Keyes was an American serial killer, kidnapper, rapist and bank robber who deliberately tried to make his crimes difficult to connect. He traveled extensively around the United States, sometimes flying to one part of the country, renting a...
After his arrest, Keyes told the FBI that he had killed multiple people over many years and claimed his murders stretched across several states, but he was deliberately evasive about names, locations and victim totals. Investigators believed he was responsible for at least 11 murders, although only three victims were conclusively identified, and he was examined in connection with numerous unsolved disappearances and homicides across the country. Keyes described choosing victims opportunistically and said he sometimes traveled specifically to kill, making geographic profiling unusually difficult. He died by suicide in an Alaska jail in December 2012 before he could be tried for most of the crimes he confessed to, leaving investigators with a disturbing combination of confirmed murders, partial confessions and unresolved questions about how many victims he actually had.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1766coldcase,coldcases,crime,crimenews,crimescene,criminaljustice,investigation,justiceforvictims,missingpersons,murder,murdermystery,serialkiller,truecrime,truecrimeaddict,truecrimecommunity,truecrimejunkie,truecrimepodcast,truecrimestories,unsolvedcases,unsolvedmysteriestruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/epstein-survivors-praise-house-panel-after-leon-black-contempt-vote-9-21-26--75268285More than a dozen Jeffrey Epstein survivors praised the House Oversight Committee after it voted 41-0 to recommend holding Leon Black in contempt of Congress for refusing to fully comply with subpoenas seeking his testimony and nondisclosure agreements. The survivors said the unanimous committee vote sent a clear message that wealth and influence should not place anyone beyond congressional scrutiny, and they urged lawmakers to keep following the Epstein evidence wherever it leads. The contempt recommendation marked a major escalation in the committee’s fight with Black, who had previously appeared for a voluntary transcribed interview but refused to answer questions about NDAs, later skipped a scheduled September 3 deposition and did not produce all of the agreements demanded by the committee. Black has denied wrongdoing and denied knowing about Epstein’s criminal conduct, while his attorneys have argued that the subpoenas are unlawful, overbroad and intrusive.

The survivors’ statement also came as Oversight Chairman James Comer introduced the Survivor’s Voice Protection Act, legislation designed to prevent NDAs from silencing survivors of sexual abuse and to require certain trusted adults to report suspected grooming of minors. Comer said the bill grew directly out of the committee’s Epstein investigation and what lawmakers had learned about powerful men using confidentiality agreements to suppress allegations. The committee said it had already conducted 19 depositions and transcribed interviews, released about 65,000 pages of documents and obtained Epstein-related bank records. The broader message from survivors was that the Black contempt fight should not be treated as an isolated dispute, but as part of a larger effort to force transparency from people who moved within Epstein’s network and to break through legal agreements that may have kept relevant information hidden.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Epstein survivors praise House panel over Leon Black contempt vote | Jeffrey Epstein | The Guardian

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75268285Mon, 21 Sep 2026 14:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciMore than a dozen Jeffrey Epstein survivors praised the House Oversight Committee after it voted 41-0 to recommend holding Leon Black in contempt of Congress for refusing to fully comply with subpoenas seeking his testimony and nondisclosure...More than a dozen Jeffrey Epstein survivors praised the House Oversight Committee after it voted 41-0 to recommend holding Leon Black in contempt of Congress for refusing to fully comply with subpoenas seeking his testimony and nondisclosure agreements. The survivors said the unanimous committee vote sent a clear message that wealth and influence should not place anyone beyond congressional scrutiny, and they urged lawmakers to keep following the Epstein evidence wherever it leads. The contempt recommendation marked a major escalation in the committee’s fight with Black, who had previously appeared for a voluntary transcribed interview but refused to answer questions about NDAs, later skipped a scheduled September 3 deposition and did not produce all of the agreements demanded by the committee. Black has denied wrongdoing and denied knowing about Epstein’s criminal conduct, while his attorneys have argued that the subpoenas are unlawful, overbroad and intrusive.

The survivors’ statement also came as Oversight Chairman James Comer introduced the Survivor’s Voice Protection Act, legislation designed to prevent NDAs from silencing survivors of sexual abuse and to require certain trusted adults to report suspected grooming of minors. Comer said the bill grew directly out of the committee’s Epstein investigation and what lawmakers had learned about powerful men using confidentiality agreements to suppress allegations. The committee said it had already conducted 19 depositions and transcribed interviews, released about 65,000 pages of documents and obtained Epstein-related bank records. The broader message from survivors was that the Black contempt fight should not be treated as an isolated dispute, but as part of a larger effort to force transparency from people who moved within Epstein’s network and to break through legal agreements that may have kept relevant information hidden.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Epstein survivors praise House panel over Leon Black contempt vote | Jeffrey Epstein | The Guardian

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>785epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/judge-sullivan-gives-todd-blanche-another-deadline-in-epstein-files-lawsuit-9-21-26--75268286
The warning came after months of litigation over whether DOJ had fully complied with Sullivan’s earlier injunction requiring additional review and production of Epstein-related records. The department had argued that some redactions were necessary to protect victims, that handwritten FBI notes were substantially similar to reports already released and that reviewing foreign-language material was too burdensome. Sullivan rejected those explanations as insufficient, saying similarity to already released records did not automatically justify withholding responsive material and ordering DOJ to start reviewing the foreign-language files. He also refused to pause the case while Blanche appealed the June injunction, and separately ordered DOJ to answer Phang’s lawsuit by September 24, produce a certified administrative-record list by October 1 and provide the record by October 15.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Judge Warns Todd Blanche He Could Face Civil Contempt Over Epstein Files | Law Commentary

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75268286Mon, 21 Sep 2026 13:18:30 +0000Bobby CapucciU.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan warned acting Attorney General Todd Blanche that he could face civil contempt if the Justice Department failed to comply with the court’s orders in the lawsuit brought by journalist and attorney Katie Phang over the...
The warning came after months of litigation over whether DOJ had fully complied with Sullivan’s earlier injunction requiring additional review and production of Epstein-related records. The department had argued that some redactions were necessary to protect victims, that handwritten FBI notes were substantially similar to reports already released and that reviewing foreign-language material was too burdensome. Sullivan rejected those explanations as insufficient, saying similarity to already released records did not automatically justify withholding responsive material and ordering DOJ to start reviewing the foreign-language files. He also refused to pause the case while Blanche appealed the June injunction, and separately ordered DOJ to answer Phang’s lawsuit by September 24, produce a certified administrative-record list by October 1 and provide the record by October 15.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Judge Warns Todd Blanche He Could Face Civil Contempt Over Epstein Files | Law Commentary

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>670epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-murders-in-moscow-and-the-confusion-following-the-arrest-9-21-26--75260285
Other mysteries centered on the timeline and what happened inside the house before the victims were discovered. Kaylee and Madison had returned home around 1:56 a.m., while Xana and Ethan had arrived earlier after attending a Sigma Chi party, but the original public timeline still contained major gaps, particularly regarding Xana and Ethan’s movements. Two surviving roommates had been in the house during the killings, and friends were called to the residence before the 911 call reporting an “unconscious person,” yet police had not revealed who actually placed the call or exactly what the roommates and friends had seen. Kohberger’s arrest therefore represented a major breakthrough, but at that stage it answered only one fundamental question: who police believed committed the murders. The motive, the relationship to the victims, the precise sequence of events, the missing weapon and the evidence connecting him to the house were still largely hidden from public view.












to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75260285Mon, 21 Sep 2026 10:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn the days immediately after Bryan Kohberger’s arrest, investigators had finally identified a suspect in the murders of Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, but many of the biggest questions about the case remained...
Other mysteries centered on the timeline and what happened inside the house before the victims were discovered. Kaylee and Madison had returned home around 1:56 a.m., while Xana and Ethan had arrived earlier after attending a Sigma Chi party, but the original public timeline still contained major gaps, particularly regarding Xana and Ethan’s movements. Two surviving roommates had been in the house during the killings, and friends were called to the residence before the 911 call reporting an “unconscious person,” yet police had not revealed who actually placed the call or exactly what the roommates and friends had seen. Kohberger’s arrest therefore represented a major breakthrough, but at that stage it answered only one fundamental question: who police believed committed the murders. The motive, the relationship to the victims, the precise sequence of events, the missing weapon and the evidence connecting him to the house were still largely hidden from public view.












to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2505bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-gary-ridgway-and-the-green-river-murders-part-17-19-9-20-26--75260287Gary Ridgway’s confessions came after he struck a 2003 plea agreement with King County prosecutors that spared him the death penalty in exchange for a complete and truthful accounting of every murder he committed in the county. Ridgway ultimately pleaded guilty to 48 counts of aggravated first-degree murder and spent months giving investigators detailed interviews about how he selected, killed and disposed of his victims. He admitted that he deliberately targeted women he believed were sex workers because he thought they would be less likely to be immediately missed and because he believed their lifestyles made them easier to approach. Ridgway described strangling most of his victims, frequently having sex with them before killing them and, in some cases, returning to their bodies afterward. He also explained how he dumped victims in clusters around remote wooded areas, the Green River and other locations so he could keep track of where he had left them.

What made the confessions especially chilling was Ridgway’s detached manner and his admission that he had killed so many women that he could no longer clearly remember all of them. Investigators used the interviews to take him back to disposal sites, identify victims and resolve cases that had remained open for decades. The FBI later described him as speaking about the murders and sexual violations with striking emotional detachment, treating the women more like objects than human beings and showing little genuine empathy for the suffering he caused. Ridgway officially admitted to 48 murders, but investigators have long believed his true victim count may have been higher, and he himself suggested during questioning that he had killed more women than he could reliably identify.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75260287Mon, 21 Sep 2026 08:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciGary Ridgway’s confessions came after he struck a 2003 plea agreement with King County prosecutors that spared him the death penalty in exchange for a complete and truthful accounting of every murder he committed in the county. Ridgway ultimately...Gary Ridgway’s confessions came after he struck a 2003 plea agreement with King County prosecutors that spared him the death penalty in exchange for a complete and truthful accounting of every murder he committed in the county. Ridgway ultimately pleaded guilty to 48 counts of aggravated first-degree murder and spent months giving investigators detailed interviews about how he selected, killed and disposed of his victims. He admitted that he deliberately targeted women he believed were sex workers because he thought they would be less likely to be immediately missed and because he believed their lifestyles made them easier to approach. Ridgway described strangling most of his victims, frequently having sex with them before killing them and, in some cases, returning to their bodies afterward. He also explained how he dumped victims in clusters around remote wooded areas, the Green River and other locations so he could keep track of where he had left them.

What made the confessions especially chilling was Ridgway’s detached manner and his admission that he had killed so many women that he could no longer clearly remember all of them. Investigators used the interviews to take him back to disposal sites, identify victims and resolve cases that had remained open for decades. The FBI later described him as speaking about the murders and sexual violations with striking emotional detachment, treating the women more like objects than human beings and showing little genuine empathy for the suffering he caused. Ridgway officially admitted to 48 murders, but investigators have long believed his true victim count may have been higher, and he himself suggested during questioning that he had killed more women than he could reliably identify.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2225epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-gary-ridgway-and-the-green-river-murders-part-13-16-9-20-26--75260286Gary Ridgway’s confessions came after he struck a 2003 plea agreement with King County prosecutors that spared him the death penalty in exchange for a complete and truthful accounting of every murder he committed in the county. Ridgway ultimately pleaded guilty to 48 counts of aggravated first-degree murder and spent months giving investigators detailed interviews about how he selected, killed and disposed of his victims. He admitted that he deliberately targeted women he believed were sex workers because he thought they would be less likely to be immediately missed and because he believed their lifestyles made them easier to approach. Ridgway described strangling most of his victims, frequently having sex with them before killing them and, in some cases, returning to their bodies afterward. He also explained how he dumped victims in clusters around remote wooded areas, the Green River and other locations so he could keep track of where he had left them.

What made the confessions especially chilling was Ridgway’s detached manner and his admission that he had killed so many women that he could no longer clearly remember all of them. Investigators used the interviews to take him back to disposal sites, identify victims and resolve cases that had remained open for decades. The FBI later described him as speaking about the murders and sexual violations with striking emotional detachment, treating the women more like objects than human beings and showing little genuine empathy for the suffering he caused. Ridgway officially admitted to 48 murders, but investigators have long believed his true victim count may have been higher, and he himself suggested during questioning that he had killed more women than he could reliably identify.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75260286Mon, 21 Sep 2026 06:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciGary Ridgway’s confessions came after he struck a 2003 plea agreement with King County prosecutors that spared him the death penalty in exchange for a complete and truthful accounting of every murder he committed in the county. Ridgway ultimately...Gary Ridgway’s confessions came after he struck a 2003 plea agreement with King County prosecutors that spared him the death penalty in exchange for a complete and truthful accounting of every murder he committed in the county. Ridgway ultimately pleaded guilty to 48 counts of aggravated first-degree murder and spent months giving investigators detailed interviews about how he selected, killed and disposed of his victims. He admitted that he deliberately targeted women he believed were sex workers because he thought they would be less likely to be immediately missed and because he believed their lifestyles made them easier to approach. Ridgway described strangling most of his victims, frequently having sex with them before killing them and, in some cases, returning to their bodies afterward. He also explained how he dumped victims in clusters around remote wooded areas, the Green River and other locations so he could keep track of where he had left them.

What made the confessions especially chilling was Ridgway’s detached manner and his admission that he had killed so many women that he could no longer clearly remember all of them. Investigators used the interviews to take him back to disposal sites, identify victims and resolve cases that had remained open for decades. The FBI later described him as speaking about the murders and sexual violations with striking emotional detachment, treating the women more like objects than human beings and showing little genuine empathy for the suffering he caused. Ridgway officially admitted to 48 murders, but investigators have long believed his true victim count may have been higher, and he himself suggested during questioning that he had killed more women than he could reliably identify.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2874epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-bryan-kohberger-and-the-death-penalty-that-loomed-over-his-case--75259583In January 2023, former Florida judge Belvin Perry, who had presided over the Casey Anthony murder trial, said he believed Idaho prosecutors were likely to seek the death penalty against Bryan Kohberger if the case reached trial. Perry based that assessment on Idaho’s capital-punishment statute and the allegations that Kohberger had murdered four University of Idaho students, Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, during the same attack. He said Idaho law contained 11 statutory aggravating factors and that, based on the accusations then known publicly, he believed several of them could potentially apply. At that point, however, prosecutors had not yet formally announced that decision, so Perry was offering a legal assessment rather than revealing an official prosecution plan.


Perry said the multiple deaths, the alleged circumstances of the killings and the burglary charge made the case one that clearly fell within the range of cases in which capital punishment could be considered under Idaho law. His prediction ultimately proved correct: on June 26, 2023, Latah County Prosecutor Bill Thompson formally filed notice that the State intended to seek the death penalty. Prosecutors cited several alleged aggravating circumstances, including multiple murders, exceptional depravity, utter disregard for human life and the commission of the killings during a burglary, while stating that they had not identified mitigating circumstances sufficient to prevent them from pursuing a capital sentence.







to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com














Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75259583Mon, 21 Sep 2026 04:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn January 2023, former Florida judge Belvin Perry, who had presided over the Casey Anthony murder trial, said he believed Idaho prosecutors were likely to seek the death penalty against Bryan Kohberger if the case reached trial. Perry based that...In January 2023, former Florida judge Belvin Perry, who had presided over the Casey Anthony murder trial, said he believed Idaho prosecutors were likely to seek the death penalty against Bryan Kohberger if the case reached trial. Perry based that assessment on Idaho’s capital-punishment statute and the allegations that Kohberger had murdered four University of Idaho students, Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, during the same attack. He said Idaho law contained 11 statutory aggravating factors and that, based on the accusations then known publicly, he believed several of them could potentially apply. At that point, however, prosecutors had not yet formally announced that decision, so Perry was offering a legal assessment rather than revealing an official prosecution plan.


Perry said the multiple deaths, the alleged circumstances of the killings and the burglary charge made the case one that clearly fell within the range of cases in which capital punishment could be considered under Idaho law. His prediction ultimately proved correct: on June 26, 2023, Latah County Prosecutor Bill Thompson formally filed notice that the State intended to seek the death penalty. Prosecutors cited several alleged aggravating circumstances, including multiple murders, exceptional depravity, utter disregard for human life and the commission of the killings during a burglary, while stating that they had not identified mitigating circumstances sufficient to prevent them from pursuing a capital sentence.







to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com














Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>761bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-the-goncalves-family-and-their-comments-after-the-arrest--75259582In the immediate aftermath of Bryan Kohberger’s December 30, 2022 arrest, Kaylee Goncalves’s family expressed a mixture of relief, cautious optimism and determination to see the case through. Steve Goncalves said the arrest made him feel that they were finally “on the path to justice” after nearly seven weeks of uncertainty, rumors and waiting for investigators to identify a suspect. He said the family did not recognize Kohberger’s name and had no known personal connection to him at that point, but they immediately began looking back through Kaylee’s life, social media and contacts to see whether any link might emerge. Family attorney Shanon Gray similarly said the arrest gave them, for the first time, a specific person whose background and possible connections to Kaylee could be examined.


Steve and Kristi Goncalves also described the emotional relief of simply knowing that authorities had someone in custody after weeks in which the family had felt powerless and unsure whether the killer would ever be found. Steve said the period without a suspect had been extraordinarily difficult because there was nothing concrete for the family to hold onto and no way to reassure their surviving children about what would happen next. They were careful not to treat the arrest as the end of the process, however, and emphasized that the case still had to move through the courts. Their reaction was therefore not one of closure, but of finally having a direction: a named defendant, an arrest and the beginning of the legal process they hoped would eventually provide answers and accountability for Kaylee and the other three victims.

to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75259582Mon, 21 Sep 2026 02:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn the immediate aftermath of Bryan Kohberger’s December 30, 2022 arrest, Kaylee Goncalves’s family expressed a mixture of relief, cautious optimism and determination to see the case through. Steve Goncalves said the arrest made him feel that they...In the immediate aftermath of Bryan Kohberger’s December 30, 2022 arrest, Kaylee Goncalves’s family expressed a mixture of relief, cautious optimism and determination to see the case through. Steve Goncalves said the arrest made him feel that they were finally “on the path to justice” after nearly seven weeks of uncertainty, rumors and waiting for investigators to identify a suspect. He said the family did not recognize Kohberger’s name and had no known personal connection to him at that point, but they immediately began looking back through Kaylee’s life, social media and contacts to see whether any link might emerge. Family attorney Shanon Gray similarly said the arrest gave them, for the first time, a specific person whose background and possible connections to Kaylee could be examined.


Steve and Kristi Goncalves also described the emotional relief of simply knowing that authorities had someone in custody after weeks in which the family had felt powerless and unsure whether the killer would ever be found. Steve said the period without a suspect had been extraordinarily difficult because there was nothing concrete for the family to hold onto and no way to reassure their surviving children about what would happen next. They were careful not to treat the arrest as the end of the process, however, and emphasized that the case still had to move through the courts. Their reaction was therefore not one of closure, but of finally having a direction: a named defendant, an arrest and the beginning of the legal process they hoped would eventually provide answers and accountability for Kaylee and the other three victims.

to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>658bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcripts-day-2-part-4-9-20-26--75238502
The defense spent much of the day attacking how strongly the forensic evidence could actually be interpreted. FBI forensic examiner Amanda Bakker was questioned for roughly three hours as defense attorney Michael Burt dug into the technical details of the DNA testing, mixtures, statistical interpretation and the limitations of what the results could establish about when or how DNA was deposited on the objects. Robinson’s lawyers also pushed back against the State’s motive theory, challenging the attempt to characterize the killing as being driven by Kirk’s religious beliefs in addition to political disagreement. By the end of day two, prosecutors had added important physical evidence to the surveillance case presented on day one, but the defense had begun laying out the approach it would use throughout the hearing: concede that certain items contained Robinson-associated evidence while aggressively challenging what that evidence actually proved about possession, timing, motive and the circumstances of Kirk’s killing.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75238502Mon, 21 Sep 2026 00:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay two of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing focused heavily on prosecutors’ effort to connect Robinson to the Utah Valley University campus and to the physical evidence recovered after Charlie Kirk was shot. Investigators introduced additional...
The defense spent much of the day attacking how strongly the forensic evidence could actually be interpreted. FBI forensic examiner Amanda Bakker was questioned for roughly three hours as defense attorney Michael Burt dug into the technical details of the DNA testing, mixtures, statistical interpretation and the limitations of what the results could establish about when or how DNA was deposited on the objects. Robinson’s lawyers also pushed back against the State’s motive theory, challenging the attempt to characterize the killing as being driven by Kirk’s religious beliefs in addition to political disagreement. By the end of day two, prosecutors had added important physical evidence to the surveillance case presented on day one, but the defense had begun laying out the approach it would use throughout the hearing: concede that certain items contained Robinson-associated evidence while aggressively challenging what that evidence actually proved about possession, timing, motive and the circumstances of Kirk’s killing.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>671breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcripts-day-2-part-3-9-20-26--75237412
The defense spent much of the day attacking how strongly the forensic evidence could actually be interpreted. FBI forensic examiner Amanda Bakker was questioned for roughly three hours as defense attorney Michael Burt dug into the technical details of the DNA testing, mixtures, statistical interpretation and the limitations of what the results could establish about when or how DNA was deposited on the objects. Robinson’s lawyers also pushed back against the State’s motive theory, challenging the attempt to characterize the killing as being driven by Kirk’s religious beliefs in addition to political disagreement. By the end of day two, prosecutors had added important physical evidence to the surveillance case presented on day one, but the defense had begun laying out the approach it would use throughout the hearing: concede that certain items contained Robinson-associated evidence while aggressively challenging what that evidence actually proved about possession, timing, motive and the circumstances of Kirk’s killing.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75237412Sun, 20 Sep 2026 22:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay two of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing focused heavily on prosecutors’ effort to connect Robinson to the Utah Valley University campus and to the physical evidence recovered after Charlie Kirk was shot. Investigators introduced additional...
The defense spent much of the day attacking how strongly the forensic evidence could actually be interpreted. FBI forensic examiner Amanda Bakker was questioned for roughly three hours as defense attorney Michael Burt dug into the technical details of the DNA testing, mixtures, statistical interpretation and the limitations of what the results could establish about when or how DNA was deposited on the objects. Robinson’s lawyers also pushed back against the State’s motive theory, challenging the attempt to characterize the killing as being driven by Kirk’s religious beliefs in addition to political disagreement. By the end of day two, prosecutors had added important physical evidence to the surveillance case presented on day one, but the defense had begun laying out the approach it would use throughout the hearing: concede that certain items contained Robinson-associated evidence while aggressively challenging what that evidence actually proved about possession, timing, motive and the circumstances of Kirk’s killing.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>960breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/hillary-clinton-and-the-transcript-from-her-epstein-related-talk-with-congress-part-16-9-20-26--75237411Hillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met Epstein, never flew on his plane, never visited Little St. James and knew nothing about his crimes before they became public. She described Maxwell as no more than a “casual acquaintance,” said she did not consider her a friend and attributed Maxwell’s presence around the Clinton family largely to her relationship with longtime Clinton friend Ted Waitt. Clinton acknowledged that Maxwell attended Chelsea Clinton’s 2010 wedding, but said she had no specific recollection of speaking with her there and believed Maxwell attended as Waitt’s guest. She also said she did not remember Maxwell visiting the Clintons’ Chappaqua home, despite Maxwell later saying she had been there several times, and said she had no knowledge of Epstein having connections to American or foreign intelligence services.

The questioning became much more contentious when lawmakers turned to Bill Clinton’s documented relationship with Epstein. Hillary characterized her husband’s relationship with Epstein as “limited” and primarily connected to his use of Epstein’s airplane, said she had no knowledge of Bill visiting Little St. James and maintained there was no evidence connecting him to Epstein’s crimes. When lawmakers pressed her about photographs showing Bill Clinton with Epstein, Maxwell and young women during trips, Clinton acknowledged seeing some of those photographs but said she had not become curious enough to investigate the circumstances herself, calling it simply “unfortunate” that her husband ever had dealings with Epstein. She also denied personally soliciting money from Epstein and said she was unaware of anyone doing so on her behalf, while acknowledging she knew little about whether Epstein played any role around Clinton Foundation or Clinton Global Initiative activities. The transcript therefore presented a consistent Clinton defense: she said she personally had essentially no relationship with Epstein and only a peripheral relationship with Maxwell, while repeatedly separating herself from questions about Bill Clinton by telling lawmakers that he would have to answer for his own conduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75237411Sun, 20 Sep 2026 20:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciHillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met...Hillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met Epstein, never flew on his plane, never visited Little St. James and knew nothing about his crimes before they became public. She described Maxwell as no more than a “casual acquaintance,” said she did not consider her a friend and attributed Maxwell’s presence around the Clinton family largely to her relationship with longtime Clinton friend Ted Waitt. Clinton acknowledged that Maxwell attended Chelsea Clinton’s 2010 wedding, but said she had no specific recollection of speaking with her there and believed Maxwell attended as Waitt’s guest. She also said she did not remember Maxwell visiting the Clintons’ Chappaqua home, despite Maxwell later saying she had been there several times, and said she had no knowledge of Epstein having connections to American or foreign intelligence services.

The questioning became much more contentious when lawmakers turned to Bill Clinton’s documented relationship with Epstein. Hillary characterized her husband’s relationship with Epstein as “limited” and primarily connected to his use of Epstein’s airplane, said she had no knowledge of Bill visiting Little St. James and maintained there was no evidence connecting him to Epstein’s crimes. When lawmakers pressed her about photographs showing Bill Clinton with Epstein, Maxwell and young women during trips, Clinton acknowledged seeing some of those photographs but said she had not become curious enough to investigate the circumstances herself, calling it simply “unfortunate” that her husband ever had dealings with Epstein. She also denied personally soliciting money from Epstein and said she was unaware of anyone doing so on her behalf, while acknowledging she knew little about whether Epstein played any role around Clinton Foundation or Clinton Global Initiative activities. The transcript therefore presented a consistent Clinton defense: she said she personally had essentially no relationship with Epstein and only a peripheral relationship with Maxwell, while repeatedly separating herself from questions about Bill Clinton by telling lawmakers that he would have to answer for his own conduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1109epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/hillary-clinton-and-the-transcript-from-her-epstein-related-talk-with-congress-part-15-9-20-26--75237414Hillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met Epstein, never flew on his plane, never visited Little St. James and knew nothing about his crimes before they became public. She described Maxwell as no more than a “casual acquaintance,” said she did not consider her a friend and attributed Maxwell’s presence around the Clinton family largely to her relationship with longtime Clinton friend Ted Waitt. Clinton acknowledged that Maxwell attended Chelsea Clinton’s 2010 wedding, but said she had no specific recollection of speaking with her there and believed Maxwell attended as Waitt’s guest. She also said she did not remember Maxwell visiting the Clintons’ Chappaqua home, despite Maxwell later saying she had been there several times, and said she had no knowledge of Epstein having connections to American or foreign intelligence services.

The questioning became much more contentious when lawmakers turned to Bill Clinton’s documented relationship with Epstein. Hillary characterized her husband’s relationship with Epstein as “limited” and primarily connected to his use of Epstein’s airplane, said she had no knowledge of Bill visiting Little St. James and maintained there was no evidence connecting him to Epstein’s crimes. When lawmakers pressed her about photographs showing Bill Clinton with Epstein, Maxwell and young women during trips, Clinton acknowledged seeing some of those photographs but said she had not become curious enough to investigate the circumstances herself, calling it simply “unfortunate” that her husband ever had dealings with Epstein. She also denied personally soliciting money from Epstein and said she was unaware of anyone doing so on her behalf, while acknowledging she knew little about whether Epstein played any role around Clinton Foundation or Clinton Global Initiative activities. The transcript therefore presented a consistent Clinton defense: she said she personally had essentially no relationship with Epstein and only a peripheral relationship with Maxwell, while repeatedly separating herself from questions about Bill Clinton by telling lawmakers that he would have to answer for his own conduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75237414Sun, 20 Sep 2026 18:30:04 +0000Bobby CapucciHillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met...Hillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met Epstein, never flew on his plane, never visited Little St. James and knew nothing about his crimes before they became public. She described Maxwell as no more than a “casual acquaintance,” said she did not consider her a friend and attributed Maxwell’s presence around the Clinton family largely to her relationship with longtime Clinton friend Ted Waitt. Clinton acknowledged that Maxwell attended Chelsea Clinton’s 2010 wedding, but said she had no specific recollection of speaking with her there and believed Maxwell attended as Waitt’s guest. She also said she did not remember Maxwell visiting the Clintons’ Chappaqua home, despite Maxwell later saying she had been there several times, and said she had no knowledge of Epstein having connections to American or foreign intelligence services.

The questioning became much more contentious when lawmakers turned to Bill Clinton’s documented relationship with Epstein. Hillary characterized her husband’s relationship with Epstein as “limited” and primarily connected to his use of Epstein’s airplane, said she had no knowledge of Bill visiting Little St. James and maintained there was no evidence connecting him to Epstein’s crimes. When lawmakers pressed her about photographs showing Bill Clinton with Epstein, Maxwell and young women during trips, Clinton acknowledged seeing some of those photographs but said she had not become curious enough to investigate the circumstances herself, calling it simply “unfortunate” that her husband ever had dealings with Epstein. She also denied personally soliciting money from Epstein and said she was unaware of anyone doing so on her behalf, while acknowledging she knew little about whether Epstein played any role around Clinton Foundation or Clinton Global Initiative activities. The transcript therefore presented a consistent Clinton defense: she said she personally had essentially no relationship with Epstein and only a peripheral relationship with Maxwell, while repeatedly separating herself from questions about Bill Clinton by telling lawmakers that he would have to answer for his own conduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>851epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/hillary-clinton-and-the-transcript-from-her-epstein-related-talk-with-congress-part-14-9-20-26--75237413Hillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met Epstein, never flew on his plane, never visited Little St. James and knew nothing about his crimes before they became public. She described Maxwell as no more than a “casual acquaintance,” said she did not consider her a friend and attributed Maxwell’s presence around the Clinton family largely to her relationship with longtime Clinton friend Ted Waitt. Clinton acknowledged that Maxwell attended Chelsea Clinton’s 2010 wedding, but said she had no specific recollection of speaking with her there and believed Maxwell attended as Waitt’s guest. She also said she did not remember Maxwell visiting the Clintons’ Chappaqua home, despite Maxwell later saying she had been there several times, and said she had no knowledge of Epstein having connections to American or foreign intelligence services.

The questioning became much more contentious when lawmakers turned to Bill Clinton’s documented relationship with Epstein. Hillary characterized her husband’s relationship with Epstein as “limited” and primarily connected to his use of Epstein’s airplane, said she had no knowledge of Bill visiting Little St. James and maintained there was no evidence connecting him to Epstein’s crimes. When lawmakers pressed her about photographs showing Bill Clinton with Epstein, Maxwell and young women during trips, Clinton acknowledged seeing some of those photographs but said she had not become curious enough to investigate the circumstances herself, calling it simply “unfortunate” that her husband ever had dealings with Epstein. She also denied personally soliciting money from Epstein and said she was unaware of anyone doing so on her behalf, while acknowledging she knew little about whether Epstein played any role around Clinton Foundation or Clinton Global Initiative activities. The transcript therefore presented a consistent Clinton defense: she said she personally had essentially no relationship with Epstein and only a peripheral relationship with Maxwell, while repeatedly separating herself from questions about Bill Clinton by telling lawmakers that he would have to answer for his own conduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75237413Sun, 20 Sep 2026 16:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciHillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met...Hillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met Epstein, never flew on his plane, never visited Little St. James and knew nothing about his crimes before they became public. She described Maxwell as no more than a “casual acquaintance,” said she did not consider her a friend and attributed Maxwell’s presence around the Clinton family largely to her relationship with longtime Clinton friend Ted Waitt. Clinton acknowledged that Maxwell attended Chelsea Clinton’s 2010 wedding, but said she had no specific recollection of speaking with her there and believed Maxwell attended as Waitt’s guest. She also said she did not remember Maxwell visiting the Clintons’ Chappaqua home, despite Maxwell later saying she had been there several times, and said she had no knowledge of Epstein having connections to American or foreign intelligence services.

The questioning became much more contentious when lawmakers turned to Bill Clinton’s documented relationship with Epstein. Hillary characterized her husband’s relationship with Epstein as “limited” and primarily connected to his use of Epstein’s airplane, said she had no knowledge of Bill visiting Little St. James and maintained there was no evidence connecting him to Epstein’s crimes. When lawmakers pressed her about photographs showing Bill Clinton with Epstein, Maxwell and young women during trips, Clinton acknowledged seeing some of those photographs but said she had not become curious enough to investigate the circumstances herself, calling it simply “unfortunate” that her husband ever had dealings with Epstein. She also denied personally soliciting money from Epstein and said she was unaware of anyone doing so on her behalf, while acknowledging she knew little about whether Epstein played any role around Clinton Foundation or Clinton Global Initiative activities. The transcript therefore presented a consistent Clinton defense: she said she personally had essentially no relationship with Epstein and only a peripheral relationship with Maxwell, while repeatedly separating herself from questions about Bill Clinton by telling lawmakers that he would have to answer for his own conduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>945epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-gary-ridgway-and-the-green-river-murders-part-10-12-9-20-26--75236820Gary Ridgway’s confessions came after he struck a 2003 plea agreement with King County prosecutors that spared him the death penalty in exchange for a complete and truthful accounting of every murder he committed in the county. Ridgway ultimately pleaded guilty to 48 counts of aggravated first-degree murder and spent months giving investigators detailed interviews about how he selected, killed and disposed of his victims. He admitted that he deliberately targeted women he believed were sex workers because he thought they would be less likely to be immediately missed and because he believed their lifestyles made them easier to approach. Ridgway described strangling most of his victims, frequently having sex with them before killing them and, in some cases, returning to their bodies afterward. He also explained how he dumped victims in clusters around remote wooded areas, the Green River and other locations so he could keep track of where he had left them.

What made the confessions especially chilling was Ridgway’s detached manner and his admission that he had killed so many women that he could no longer clearly remember all of them. Investigators used the interviews to take him back to disposal sites, identify victims and resolve cases that had remained open for decades. The FBI later described him as speaking about the murders and sexual violations with striking emotional detachment, treating the women more like objects than human beings and showing little genuine empathy for the suffering he caused. Ridgway officially admitted to 48 murders, but investigators have long believed his true victim count may have been higher, and he himself suggested during questioning that he had killed more women than he could reliably identify.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75236820Sun, 20 Sep 2026 14:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciGary Ridgway’s confessions came after he struck a 2003 plea agreement with King County prosecutors that spared him the death penalty in exchange for a complete and truthful accounting of every murder he committed in the county. Ridgway ultimately...Gary Ridgway’s confessions came after he struck a 2003 plea agreement with King County prosecutors that spared him the death penalty in exchange for a complete and truthful accounting of every murder he committed in the county. Ridgway ultimately pleaded guilty to 48 counts of aggravated first-degree murder and spent months giving investigators detailed interviews about how he selected, killed and disposed of his victims. He admitted that he deliberately targeted women he believed were sex workers because he thought they would be less likely to be immediately missed and because he believed their lifestyles made them easier to approach. Ridgway described strangling most of his victims, frequently having sex with them before killing them and, in some cases, returning to their bodies afterward. He also explained how he dumped victims in clusters around remote wooded areas, the Green River and other locations so he could keep track of where he had left them.

What made the confessions especially chilling was Ridgway’s detached manner and his admission that he had killed so many women that he could no longer clearly remember all of them. Investigators used the interviews to take him back to disposal sites, identify victims and resolve cases that had remained open for decades. The FBI later described him as speaking about the murders and sexual violations with striking emotional detachment, treating the women more like objects than human beings and showing little genuine empathy for the suffering he caused. Ridgway officially admitted to 48 murders, but investigators have long believed his true victim count may have been higher, and he himself suggested during questioning that he had killed more women than he could reliably identify.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2810coldcase,crime,crimeinvestigation,criminalpsychology,forensics,justice,missingpersons,murder,mystery,serialkiller,truecrime,truecrimeaddict,truecrimecommunity,truecrimedocumentary,truecrimejunkie,truecrimeobsessed,truecrimepodcast,truecrimepodcasts,truecrimestories,unsolvedmysteriestruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-gary-ridgway-and-the-green-river-murders-part-5-8-9-20-26--75236818Gary Ridgway’s confessions came after he struck a 2003 plea agreement with King County prosecutors that spared him the death penalty in exchange for a complete and truthful accounting of every murder he committed in the county. Ridgway ultimately pleaded guilty to 48 counts of aggravated first-degree murder and spent months giving investigators detailed interviews about how he selected, killed and disposed of his victims. He admitted that he deliberately targeted women he believed were sex workers because he thought they would be less likely to be immediately missed and because he believed their lifestyles made them easier to approach. Ridgway described strangling most of his victims, frequently having sex with them before killing them and, in some cases, returning to their bodies afterward. He also explained how he dumped victims in clusters around remote wooded areas, the Green River and other locations so he could keep track of where he had left them.

What made the confessions especially chilling was Ridgway’s detached manner and his admission that he had killed so many women that he could no longer clearly remember all of them. Investigators used the interviews to take him back to disposal sites, identify victims and resolve cases that had remained open for decades. The FBI later described him as speaking about the murders and sexual violations with striking emotional detachment, treating the women more like objects than human beings and showing little genuine empathy for the suffering he caused. Ridgway officially admitted to 48 murders, but investigators have long believed his true victim count may have been higher, and he himself suggested during questioning that he had killed more women than he could reliably identify.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75236818Sun, 20 Sep 2026 12:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciGary Ridgway’s confessions came after he struck a 2003 plea agreement with King County prosecutors that spared him the death penalty in exchange for a complete and truthful accounting of every murder he committed in the county. Ridgway ultimately...Gary Ridgway’s confessions came after he struck a 2003 plea agreement with King County prosecutors that spared him the death penalty in exchange for a complete and truthful accounting of every murder he committed in the county. Ridgway ultimately pleaded guilty to 48 counts of aggravated first-degree murder and spent months giving investigators detailed interviews about how he selected, killed and disposed of his victims. He admitted that he deliberately targeted women he believed were sex workers because he thought they would be less likely to be immediately missed and because he believed their lifestyles made them easier to approach. Ridgway described strangling most of his victims, frequently having sex with them before killing them and, in some cases, returning to their bodies afterward. He also explained how he dumped victims in clusters around remote wooded areas, the Green River and other locations so he could keep track of where he had left them.

What made the confessions especially chilling was Ridgway’s detached manner and his admission that he had killed so many women that he could no longer clearly remember all of them. Investigators used the interviews to take him back to disposal sites, identify victims and resolve cases that had remained open for decades. The FBI later described him as speaking about the murders and sexual violations with striking emotional detachment, treating the women more like objects than human beings and showing little genuine empathy for the suffering he caused. Ridgway officially admitted to 48 murders, but investigators have long believed his true victim count may have been higher, and he himself suggested during questioning that he had killed more women than he could reliably identify.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2896coldcase,crime,crimeinvestigation,criminalpsychology,forensics,justice,missingpersons,murder,mystery,serialkiller,truecrime,truecrimeaddict,truecrimecommunity,truecrimedocumentary,truecrimejunkie,truecrimeobsessed,truecrimepodcast,truecrimepodcasts,truecrimestories,unsolvedmysteriestruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-gary-ridgway-and-the-green-river-murders-part-1-4-9-19-26--75236819Gary Ridgway’s confessions came after he struck a 2003 plea agreement with King County prosecutors that spared him the death penalty in exchange for a complete and truthful accounting of every murder he committed in the county. Ridgway ultimately pleaded guilty to 48 counts of aggravated first-degree murder and spent months giving investigators detailed interviews about how he selected, killed and disposed of his victims. He admitted that he deliberately targeted women he believed were sex workers because he thought they would be less likely to be immediately missed and because he believed their lifestyles made them easier to approach. Ridgway described strangling most of his victims, frequently having sex with them before killing them and, in some cases, returning to their bodies afterward. He also explained how he dumped victims in clusters around remote wooded areas, the Green River and other locations so he could keep track of where he had left them.

What made the confessions especially chilling was Ridgway’s detached manner and his admission that he had killed so many women that he could no longer clearly remember all of them. Investigators used the interviews to take him back to disposal sites, identify victims and resolve cases that had remained open for decades. The FBI later described him as speaking about the murders and sexual violations with striking emotional detachment, treating the women more like objects than human beings and showing little genuine empathy for the suffering he caused. Ridgway officially admitted to 48 murders, but investigators have long believed his true victim count may have been higher, and he himself suggested during questioning that he had killed more women than he could reliably identify.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com









Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75236819Sun, 20 Sep 2026 10:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciGary Ridgway’s confessions came after he struck a 2003 plea agreement with King County prosecutors that spared him the death penalty in exchange for a complete and truthful accounting of every murder he committed in the county. Ridgway ultimately...Gary Ridgway’s confessions came after he struck a 2003 plea agreement with King County prosecutors that spared him the death penalty in exchange for a complete and truthful accounting of every murder he committed in the county. Ridgway ultimately pleaded guilty to 48 counts of aggravated first-degree murder and spent months giving investigators detailed interviews about how he selected, killed and disposed of his victims. He admitted that he deliberately targeted women he believed were sex workers because he thought they would be less likely to be immediately missed and because he believed their lifestyles made them easier to approach. Ridgway described strangling most of his victims, frequently having sex with them before killing them and, in some cases, returning to their bodies afterward. He also explained how he dumped victims in clusters around remote wooded areas, the Green River and other locations so he could keep track of where he had left them.

What made the confessions especially chilling was Ridgway’s detached manner and his admission that he had killed so many women that he could no longer clearly remember all of them. Investigators used the interviews to take him back to disposal sites, identify victims and resolve cases that had remained open for decades. The FBI later described him as speaking about the murders and sexual violations with striking emotional detachment, treating the women more like objects than human beings and showing little genuine empathy for the suffering he caused. Ridgway officially admitted to 48 murders, but investigators have long believed his true victim count may have been higher, and he himself suggested during questioning that he had killed more women than he could reliably identify.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com









Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2812coldcase,crime,crimeinvestigation,criminalpsychology,forensics,justice,missingpersons,murder,mystery,serialkiller,truecrime,truecrimeaddict,truecrimecommunity,truecrimedocumentary,truecrimejunkie,truecrimeobsessed,truecrimepodcast,truecrimepodcasts,truecrimestories,unsolvedmysteriestruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-national-forest-serial-killer-part-3-5-9-18-26--75236616
Hilton was also convicted in Florida of kidnapping and murdering Cheryl Dunlap, whose decapitated body was found in the Apalachicola National Forest in December 2007. A Florida jury unanimously recommended the death penalty, and he was sentenced to death in 2011. He received additional life sentences for the Bryant murders, while his Georgia sentence for Emerson’s murder was life imprisonment. Investigators also examined Hilton in connection with other unsolved disappearances and killings, including cases involving people who vanished near hiking areas, though not all of those suspicions resulted in charges. His crimes stood out for their predatory use of isolated public lands, where he could approach victims with little chance of witnesses and then use the surrounding wilderness to hide evidence and bodies.












to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75236616Sun, 20 Sep 2026 08:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciGary Michael Hilton was a drifter and convicted serial killer who became known as the “National Forest Serial Killer” after targeting people in remote wilderness areas across Georgia, Florida and North Carolina. His known killing spree unfolded in...
Hilton was also convicted in Florida of kidnapping and murdering Cheryl Dunlap, whose decapitated body was found in the Apalachicola National Forest in December 2007. A Florida jury unanimously recommended the death penalty, and he was sentenced to death in 2011. He received additional life sentences for the Bryant murders, while his Georgia sentence for Emerson’s murder was life imprisonment. Investigators also examined Hilton in connection with other unsolved disappearances and killings, including cases involving people who vanished near hiking areas, though not all of those suspicions resulted in charges. His crimes stood out for their predatory use of isolated public lands, where he could approach victims with little chance of witnesses and then use the surrounding wilderness to hide evidence and bodies.












to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2174coldcase,crime,crimeinvestigation,criminalpsychology,forensics,justice,missingpersons,murder,mystery,serialkiller,truecrime,truecrimeaddict,truecrimecommunity,truecrimedocumentary,truecrimejunkie,truecrimeobsessed,truecrimepodcast,truecrimepodcasts,truecrimestories,unsolvedmysteriestruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-national-forest-serial-killer-part-1-2-9-18-26--75236617
Hilton was also convicted in Florida of kidnapping and murdering Cheryl Dunlap, whose decapitated body was found in the Apalachicola National Forest in December 2007. A Florida jury unanimously recommended the death penalty, and he was sentenced to death in 2011. He received additional life sentences for the Bryant murders, while his Georgia sentence for Emerson’s murder was life imprisonment. Investigators also examined Hilton in connection with other unsolved disappearances and killings, including cases involving people who vanished near hiking areas, though not all of those suspicions resulted in charges. His crimes stood out for their predatory use of isolated public lands, where he could approach victims with little chance of witnesses and then use the surrounding wilderness to hide evidence and bodies.












to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75236617Sun, 20 Sep 2026 06:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciGary Michael Hilton was a drifter and convicted serial killer who became known as the “National Forest Serial Killer” after targeting people in remote wilderness areas across Georgia, Florida and North Carolina. His known killing spree unfolded in...
Hilton was also convicted in Florida of kidnapping and murdering Cheryl Dunlap, whose decapitated body was found in the Apalachicola National Forest in December 2007. A Florida jury unanimously recommended the death penalty, and he was sentenced to death in 2011. He received additional life sentences for the Bryant murders, while his Georgia sentence for Emerson’s murder was life imprisonment. Investigators also examined Hilton in connection with other unsolved disappearances and killings, including cases involving people who vanished near hiking areas, though not all of those suspicions resulted in charges. His crimes stood out for their predatory use of isolated public lands, where he could approach victims with little chance of witnesses and then use the surrounding wilderness to hide evidence and bodies.












to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2546coldcase,crime,crimeinvestigation,criminalpsychology,forensics,justice,missingpersons,murder,mystery,serialkiller,truecrime,truecrimeaddict,truecrimecommunity,truecrimedocumentary,truecrimejunkie,truecrimeobsessed,truecrimepodcast,truecrimepodcasts,truecrimestories,unsolvedmysteriestruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-ethan-chapin-s-parent-s-discuss-their-memories-of-their-son--75198660Nearly a year after Ethan Chapin was murdered alongside Xana Kernodle, Madison Mogen and Kaylee Goncalves, his parents, Stacy and Jim Chapin, described how their family had tried to survive an unimaginable year of grief without allowing the murders to completely define Ethan’s life. They spoke about the devastating reality of losing one of their triplets, the effect Ethan’s death had on his brother Hunter and sister Maizie, and the deliberate choice they made to focus on the person Ethan had been rather than the brutality of how he died. Stacy and Jim said they had largely stayed away from the constant media cycle surrounding Bryan Kohberger and the criminal case because they believed endlessly consuming developments would only deepen their pain. Instead, they tried to move forward by keeping Ethan present in their daily lives, talking about him openly and finding ways to turn their grief into something positive.

That effort included Stacy’s children’s book, The Boy Who Wore Blue, which was created to capture Ethan’s personality, warmth and love of the color blue while giving younger readers a way to understand loss and remembrance. The family also established the Ethan’s Smile Foundation, which provided scholarships for students from their home community in Skagit County, Washington, and continued supporting the “Ethan’s Smile” tulip project that had been created in his honor. Jim and Stacy said those projects gave them something constructive to build from the devastation and allowed Ethan’s name to become associated with opportunity, generosity and joy rather than only with the Moscow murders. Their message was not that the grief had disappeared, but that they had chosen to carry Ethan forward by emphasizing how he lived instead of allowing his murder to become the final definition of who he was.

to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75198660Sun, 20 Sep 2026 04:30:03 +0000Bobby CapucciNearly a year after Ethan Chapin was murdered alongside Xana Kernodle, Madison Mogen and Kaylee Goncalves, his parents, Stacy and Jim Chapin, described how their family had tried to survive an unimaginable year of grief without allowing the murders to...Nearly a year after Ethan Chapin was murdered alongside Xana Kernodle, Madison Mogen and Kaylee Goncalves, his parents, Stacy and Jim Chapin, described how their family had tried to survive an unimaginable year of grief without allowing the murders to completely define Ethan’s life. They spoke about the devastating reality of losing one of their triplets, the effect Ethan’s death had on his brother Hunter and sister Maizie, and the deliberate choice they made to focus on the person Ethan had been rather than the brutality of how he died. Stacy and Jim said they had largely stayed away from the constant media cycle surrounding Bryan Kohberger and the criminal case because they believed endlessly consuming developments would only deepen their pain. Instead, they tried to move forward by keeping Ethan present in their daily lives, talking about him openly and finding ways to turn their grief into something positive.

That effort included Stacy’s children’s book, The Boy Who Wore Blue, which was created to capture Ethan’s personality, warmth and love of the color blue while giving younger readers a way to understand loss and remembrance. The family also established the Ethan’s Smile Foundation, which provided scholarships for students from their home community in Skagit County, Washington, and continued supporting the “Ethan’s Smile” tulip project that had been created in his honor. Jim and Stacy said those projects gave them something constructive to build from the devastation and allowed Ethan’s name to become associated with opportunity, generosity and joy rather than only with the Moscow murders. Their message was not that the grief had disappeared, but that they had chosen to carry Ethan forward by emphasizing how he lived instead of allowing his murder to become the final definition of who he was.

to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>751bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-ethan-chapin-s-fraternity-brothers-and-their-plan-to-honor-ethan--75198659One year after the murders of Ethan Chapin, Xana Kernodle, Madison Mogen and Kaylee Goncalves, members of the University of Idaho’s Sigma Chi fraternity described how deeply Ethan’s death had affected the chapter and how they were trying to heal while keeping his memory alive. His fraternity brothers remembered Ethan as energetic, dependable and the kind of person who could lift the mood of an entire room, describing him as someone they could always count on. The chapter had largely avoided the spotlight in the immediate aftermath of the killings, choosing instead to grieve privately and support Ethan’s family while cooperating with investigators. As the anniversary approached, members spoke more openly about the emotional toll of losing one of their own and about the strange experience of trying to return to normal college life after such a devastating loss.

Sigma Chi also worked to create a lasting memorial to Ethan through the Ethan Chapin Memorial Scholarship, which was established to be awarded annually to a member of the Gamma Eta chapter who reflected the qualities Ethan brought to the fraternity. The first scholarship was awarded to Ethan’s triplet brother Hunter, who was also a Sigma Chi at the university. For the fraternity, the scholarship became a way to make sure Ethan was remembered for more than the circumstances of his death. His brothers emphasized his humor, generosity and loyalty, and said the chapter’s focus was on carrying those traits forward while continuing to support the Chapin family and one another.












to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com










Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75198659Sun, 20 Sep 2026 02:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciOne year after the murders of Ethan Chapin, Xana Kernodle, Madison Mogen and Kaylee Goncalves, members of the University of Idaho’s Sigma Chi fraternity described how deeply Ethan’s death had affected the chapter and how they were trying to heal while...One year after the murders of Ethan Chapin, Xana Kernodle, Madison Mogen and Kaylee Goncalves, members of the University of Idaho’s Sigma Chi fraternity described how deeply Ethan’s death had affected the chapter and how they were trying to heal while keeping his memory alive. His fraternity brothers remembered Ethan as energetic, dependable and the kind of person who could lift the mood of an entire room, describing him as someone they could always count on. The chapter had largely avoided the spotlight in the immediate aftermath of the killings, choosing instead to grieve privately and support Ethan’s family while cooperating with investigators. As the anniversary approached, members spoke more openly about the emotional toll of losing one of their own and about the strange experience of trying to return to normal college life after such a devastating loss.

Sigma Chi also worked to create a lasting memorial to Ethan through the Ethan Chapin Memorial Scholarship, which was established to be awarded annually to a member of the Gamma Eta chapter who reflected the qualities Ethan brought to the fraternity. The first scholarship was awarded to Ethan’s triplet brother Hunter, who was also a Sigma Chi at the university. For the fraternity, the scholarship became a way to make sure Ethan was remembered for more than the circumstances of his death. His brothers emphasized his humor, generosity and loyalty, and said the chapter’s focus was on carrying those traits forward while continuing to support the Chapin family and one another.












to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com










Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>708bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcripts-day-2-part-2-9-19-26--75221837
The defense spent much of the day attacking how strongly the forensic evidence could actually be interpreted. FBI forensic examiner Amanda Bakker was questioned for roughly three hours as defense attorney Michael Burt dug into the technical details of the DNA testing, mixtures, statistical interpretation and the limitations of what the results could establish about when or how DNA was deposited on the objects. Robinson’s lawyers also pushed back against the State’s motive theory, challenging the attempt to characterize the killing as being driven by Kirk’s religious beliefs in addition to political disagreement. By the end of day two, prosecutors had added important physical evidence to the surveillance case presented on day one, but the defense had begun laying out the approach it would use throughout the hearing: concede that certain items contained Robinson-associated evidence while aggressively challenging what that evidence actually proved about possession, timing, motive and the circumstances of Kirk’s killing.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75221837Sun, 20 Sep 2026 00:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay two of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing focused heavily on prosecutors’ effort to connect Robinson to the Utah Valley University campus and to the physical evidence recovered after Charlie Kirk was shot. Investigators introduced additional...
The defense spent much of the day attacking how strongly the forensic evidence could actually be interpreted. FBI forensic examiner Amanda Bakker was questioned for roughly three hours as defense attorney Michael Burt dug into the technical details of the DNA testing, mixtures, statistical interpretation and the limitations of what the results could establish about when or how DNA was deposited on the objects. Robinson’s lawyers also pushed back against the State’s motive theory, challenging the attempt to characterize the killing as being driven by Kirk’s religious beliefs in addition to political disagreement. By the end of day two, prosecutors had added important physical evidence to the surveillance case presented on day one, but the defense had begun laying out the approach it would use throughout the hearing: concede that certain items contained Robinson-associated evidence while aggressively challenging what that evidence actually proved about possession, timing, motive and the circumstances of Kirk’s killing.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>681breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcripts-day-2-part-1-9-19-26--75221836
The defense spent much of the day attacking how strongly the forensic evidence could actually be interpreted. FBI forensic examiner Amanda Bakker was questioned for roughly three hours as defense attorney Michael Burt dug into the technical details of the DNA testing, mixtures, statistical interpretation and the limitations of what the results could establish about when or how DNA was deposited on the objects. Robinson’s lawyers also pushed back against the State’s motive theory, challenging the attempt to characterize the killing as being driven by Kirk’s religious beliefs in addition to political disagreement. By the end of day two, prosecutors had added important physical evidence to the surveillance case presented on day one, but the defense had begun laying out the approach it would use throughout the hearing: concede that certain items contained Robinson-associated evidence while aggressively challenging what that evidence actually proved about possession, timing, motive and the circumstances of Kirk’s killing.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75221836Sat, 19 Sep 2026 22:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay two of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing focused heavily on prosecutors’ effort to connect Robinson to the Utah Valley University campus and to the physical evidence recovered after Charlie Kirk was shot. Investigators introduced additional...
The defense spent much of the day attacking how strongly the forensic evidence could actually be interpreted. FBI forensic examiner Amanda Bakker was questioned for roughly three hours as defense attorney Michael Burt dug into the technical details of the DNA testing, mixtures, statistical interpretation and the limitations of what the results could establish about when or how DNA was deposited on the objects. Robinson’s lawyers also pushed back against the State’s motive theory, challenging the attempt to characterize the killing as being driven by Kirk’s religious beliefs in addition to political disagreement. By the end of day two, prosecutors had added important physical evidence to the surveillance case presented on day one, but the defense had begun laying out the approach it would use throughout the hearing: concede that certain items contained Robinson-associated evidence while aggressively challenging what that evidence actually proved about possession, timing, motive and the circumstances of Kirk’s killing.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1205breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/hillary-clinton-and-the-transcript-from-her-epstein-related-talk-with-congress-part-13-9-19-26--75220919Hillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met Epstein, never flew on his plane, never visited Little St. James and knew nothing about his crimes before they became public. She described Maxwell as no more than a “casual acquaintance,” said she did not consider her a friend and attributed Maxwell’s presence around the Clinton family largely to her relationship with longtime Clinton friend Ted Waitt. Clinton acknowledged that Maxwell attended Chelsea Clinton’s 2010 wedding, but said she had no specific recollection of speaking with her there and believed Maxwell attended as Waitt’s guest. She also said she did not remember Maxwell visiting the Clintons’ Chappaqua home, despite Maxwell later saying she had been there several times, and said she had no knowledge of Epstein having connections to American or foreign intelligence services.

The questioning became much more contentious when lawmakers turned to Bill Clinton’s documented relationship with Epstein. Hillary characterized her husband’s relationship with Epstein as “limited” and primarily connected to his use of Epstein’s airplane, said she had no knowledge of Bill visiting Little St. James and maintained there was no evidence connecting him to Epstein’s crimes. When lawmakers pressed her about photographs showing Bill Clinton with Epstein, Maxwell and young women during trips, Clinton acknowledged seeing some of those photographs but said she had not become curious enough to investigate the circumstances herself, calling it simply “unfortunate” that her husband ever had dealings with Epstein. She also denied personally soliciting money from Epstein and said she was unaware of anyone doing so on her behalf, while acknowledging she knew little about whether Epstein played any role around Clinton Foundation or Clinton Global Initiative activities. The transcript therefore presented a consistent Clinton defense: she said she personally had essentially no relationship with Epstein and only a peripheral relationship with Maxwell, while repeatedly separating herself from questions about Bill Clinton by telling lawmakers that he would have to answer for his own conduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75220919Sat, 19 Sep 2026 20:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciHillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met...Hillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met Epstein, never flew on his plane, never visited Little St. James and knew nothing about his crimes before they became public. She described Maxwell as no more than a “casual acquaintance,” said she did not consider her a friend and attributed Maxwell’s presence around the Clinton family largely to her relationship with longtime Clinton friend Ted Waitt. Clinton acknowledged that Maxwell attended Chelsea Clinton’s 2010 wedding, but said she had no specific recollection of speaking with her there and believed Maxwell attended as Waitt’s guest. She also said she did not remember Maxwell visiting the Clintons’ Chappaqua home, despite Maxwell later saying she had been there several times, and said she had no knowledge of Epstein having connections to American or foreign intelligence services.

The questioning became much more contentious when lawmakers turned to Bill Clinton’s documented relationship with Epstein. Hillary characterized her husband’s relationship with Epstein as “limited” and primarily connected to his use of Epstein’s airplane, said she had no knowledge of Bill visiting Little St. James and maintained there was no evidence connecting him to Epstein’s crimes. When lawmakers pressed her about photographs showing Bill Clinton with Epstein, Maxwell and young women during trips, Clinton acknowledged seeing some of those photographs but said she had not become curious enough to investigate the circumstances herself, calling it simply “unfortunate” that her husband ever had dealings with Epstein. She also denied personally soliciting money from Epstein and said she was unaware of anyone doing so on her behalf, while acknowledging she knew little about whether Epstein played any role around Clinton Foundation or Clinton Global Initiative activities. The transcript therefore presented a consistent Clinton defense: she said she personally had essentially no relationship with Epstein and only a peripheral relationship with Maxwell, while repeatedly separating herself from questions about Bill Clinton by telling lawmakers that he would have to answer for his own conduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>994epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverupfalsefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/hillary-clinton-and-the-transcript-from-her-epstein-related-talk-with-congress-part-12-9-19-26--75220920Hillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met Epstein, never flew on his plane, never visited Little St. James and knew nothing about his crimes before they became public. She described Maxwell as no more than a “casual acquaintance,” said she did not consider her a friend and attributed Maxwell’s presence around the Clinton family largely to her relationship with longtime Clinton friend Ted Waitt. Clinton acknowledged that Maxwell attended Chelsea Clinton’s 2010 wedding, but said she had no specific recollection of speaking with her there and believed Maxwell attended as Waitt’s guest. She also said she did not remember Maxwell visiting the Clintons’ Chappaqua home, despite Maxwell later saying she had been there several times, and said she had no knowledge of Epstein having connections to American or foreign intelligence services.

The questioning became much more contentious when lawmakers turned to Bill Clinton’s documented relationship with Epstein. Hillary characterized her husband’s relationship with Epstein as “limited” and primarily connected to his use of Epstein’s airplane, said she had no knowledge of Bill visiting Little St. James and maintained there was no evidence connecting him to Epstein’s crimes. When lawmakers pressed her about photographs showing Bill Clinton with Epstein, Maxwell and young women during trips, Clinton acknowledged seeing some of those photographs but said she had not become curious enough to investigate the circumstances herself, calling it simply “unfortunate” that her husband ever had dealings with Epstein. She also denied personally soliciting money from Epstein and said she was unaware of anyone doing so on her behalf, while acknowledging she knew little about whether Epstein played any role around Clinton Foundation or Clinton Global Initiative activities. The transcript therefore presented a consistent Clinton defense: she said she personally had essentially no relationship with Epstein and only a peripheral relationship with Maxwell, while repeatedly separating herself from questions about Bill Clinton by telling lawmakers that he would have to answer for his own conduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75220920Sat, 19 Sep 2026 18:30:05 +0000Bobby CapucciHillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met...Hillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met Epstein, never flew on his plane, never visited Little St. James and knew nothing about his crimes before they became public. She described Maxwell as no more than a “casual acquaintance,” said she did not consider her a friend and attributed Maxwell’s presence around the Clinton family largely to her relationship with longtime Clinton friend Ted Waitt. Clinton acknowledged that Maxwell attended Chelsea Clinton’s 2010 wedding, but said she had no specific recollection of speaking with her there and believed Maxwell attended as Waitt’s guest. She also said she did not remember Maxwell visiting the Clintons’ Chappaqua home, despite Maxwell later saying she had been there several times, and said she had no knowledge of Epstein having connections to American or foreign intelligence services.

The questioning became much more contentious when lawmakers turned to Bill Clinton’s documented relationship with Epstein. Hillary characterized her husband’s relationship with Epstein as “limited” and primarily connected to his use of Epstein’s airplane, said she had no knowledge of Bill visiting Little St. James and maintained there was no evidence connecting him to Epstein’s crimes. When lawmakers pressed her about photographs showing Bill Clinton with Epstein, Maxwell and young women during trips, Clinton acknowledged seeing some of those photographs but said she had not become curious enough to investigate the circumstances herself, calling it simply “unfortunate” that her husband ever had dealings with Epstein. She also denied personally soliciting money from Epstein and said she was unaware of anyone doing so on her behalf, while acknowledging she knew little about whether Epstein played any role around Clinton Foundation or Clinton Global Initiative activities. The transcript therefore presented a consistent Clinton defense: she said she personally had essentially no relationship with Epstein and only a peripheral relationship with Maxwell, while repeatedly separating herself from questions about Bill Clinton by telling lawmakers that he would have to answer for his own conduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1026epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/florida-woman-pleads-guilty-to-defrauding-jeffrey-epstein-victims-fund-9-19-26--75220921
The fraud deepened after the FBI began investigating. When agents confronted Percival in late 2025 with the genuine rejection letter, she falsely claimed she had successfully appealed the decision and then provided her lawyer with fabricated emails that were submitted to federal prosecutors in an effort to secure a deferred-prosecution agreement. Percival eventually admitted wrongdoing and arrived at her plea hearing with a check covering the $776,031 she owed in restitution. Prosecutors have not said whether she was actually one of Epstein’s victims, only that the records she used to obtain the settlement money were fraudulent. Under the plea agreement, federal sentencing guidelines called for roughly three to four years in prison, although the judge was not bound by that range.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Florida woman pleads guilty to defrauding fund for Jeffrey Epstein victims - ABC News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75220921Sat, 19 Sep 2026 16:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciA Florida woman, Jennifer Percival, pleaded guilty in federal court in New York to falsifying records in order to obtain money from a compensation fund for Jeffrey Epstein victims. Percival had applied to Epstein’s estate-funded victims program in...
The fraud deepened after the FBI began investigating. When agents confronted Percival in late 2025 with the genuine rejection letter, she falsely claimed she had successfully appealed the decision and then provided her lawyer with fabricated emails that were submitted to federal prosecutors in an effort to secure a deferred-prosecution agreement. Percival eventually admitted wrongdoing and arrived at her plea hearing with a check covering the $776,031 she owed in restitution. Prosecutors have not said whether she was actually one of Epstein’s victims, only that the records she used to obtain the settlement money were fraudulent. Under the plea agreement, federal sentencing guidelines called for roughly three to four years in prison, although the judge was not bound by that range.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Florida woman pleads guilty to defrauding fund for Jeffrey Epstein victims - ABC News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>645falsefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-the-arraignment-hearing-9-19-26--75210932
The gag-order fight unfolded alongside that transition and centered on whether the sweeping nondissemination order imposed earlier by Magistrate Judge Megan Marshall should remain in place. A coalition of news organizations argued that the restrictions were overly broad, interfered with First Amendment rights and prevented the press from obtaining information from attorneys, investigators and others connected to the case. The Goncalves family, through attorney Shanon Gray, separately sought to have the order amended or clarified because it restricted what victims’ families and their representatives could say publicly. Judge Judge heard oral arguments on June 9, 2023, after both the prosecution and Kohberger’s defense opposed lifting the restrictions, arguing that the extraordinary publicity surrounding the case threatened Kohberger’s right to an impartial jury. On June 23, Judge Judge denied the media coalition’s request to vacate the amended gag order, leaving the restrictions largely intact while the case continued toward trial.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75210932Sat, 19 Sep 2026 14:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBryan Kohberger was arraigned in Latah County District Court on May 22, 2023, after a grand jury indicted him on four counts of first-degree murder and one count of burglary in the killings of Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan...
The gag-order fight unfolded alongside that transition and centered on whether the sweeping nondissemination order imposed earlier by Magistrate Judge Megan Marshall should remain in place. A coalition of news organizations argued that the restrictions were overly broad, interfered with First Amendment rights and prevented the press from obtaining information from attorneys, investigators and others connected to the case. The Goncalves family, through attorney Shanon Gray, separately sought to have the order amended or clarified because it restricted what victims’ families and their representatives could say publicly. Judge Judge heard oral arguments on June 9, 2023, after both the prosecution and Kohberger’s defense opposed lifting the restrictions, arguing that the extraordinary publicity surrounding the case threatened Kohberger’s right to an impartial jury. On June 23, Judge Judge denied the media coalition’s request to vacate the amended gag order, leaving the restrictions largely intact while the case continued toward trial.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2228bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-his-time-in-pennsylvania-9-19-26--75210934Bryan Kohberger returned to Pennsylvania in December 2022 after finishing his first semester as a criminology doctoral student at Washington State University. His father flew to Washington and drove back east with him in Kohberger’s white Hyundai Elantra, arriving at the family home in northeastern Pennsylvania around December 17 or 18. By then investigators in Idaho had focused heavily on Kohberger through the Elantra, cellphone evidence and DNA recovered from the knife sheath at 1122 King Road. Federal agents surveilled him in Pennsylvania for several days while Idaho authorities finalized the probable-cause case and obtained an arrest warrant. In the early morning hours of December 30, FBI agents, Pennsylvania State Police and other officers entered the Kohberger family home and arrested him on four counts of first-degree murder and one count of burglary. He was initially questioned after receiving Miranda warnings, but the interview stopped after several minutes when he asked for an attorney.

Kohberger was then held without bail at the Monroe County Correctional Facility while Pennsylvania handled the extradition process. Monroe County Chief Public Defender Jason LaBar represented him only for the Pennsylvania proceedings and described Kohberger as calm, intelligent and aware of the seriousness of the situation. Kohberger decided not to fight extradition, appearing in court on January 3, 2023, and formally waiving his right to a lengthy extradition hearing so he could be returned quickly to Idaho. His family attended the proceeding and became emotional as he acknowledged the transfer. Pennsylvania authorities then turned him over for transport west, and he arrived back in Idaho on January 4, ending a brief but crucial period in Pennsylvania during which he went from spending the holidays at his parents’ home to being jailed as the accused killer in one of the country’s most closely watched murder cases.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75210934Sat, 19 Sep 2026 12:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBryan Kohberger returned to Pennsylvania in December 2022 after finishing his first semester as a criminology doctoral student at Washington State University. His father flew to Washington and drove back east with him in Kohberger’s white Hyundai...Bryan Kohberger returned to Pennsylvania in December 2022 after finishing his first semester as a criminology doctoral student at Washington State University. His father flew to Washington and drove back east with him in Kohberger’s white Hyundai Elantra, arriving at the family home in northeastern Pennsylvania around December 17 or 18. By then investigators in Idaho had focused heavily on Kohberger through the Elantra, cellphone evidence and DNA recovered from the knife sheath at 1122 King Road. Federal agents surveilled him in Pennsylvania for several days while Idaho authorities finalized the probable-cause case and obtained an arrest warrant. In the early morning hours of December 30, FBI agents, Pennsylvania State Police and other officers entered the Kohberger family home and arrested him on four counts of first-degree murder and one count of burglary. He was initially questioned after receiving Miranda warnings, but the interview stopped after several minutes when he asked for an attorney.

Kohberger was then held without bail at the Monroe County Correctional Facility while Pennsylvania handled the extradition process. Monroe County Chief Public Defender Jason LaBar represented him only for the Pennsylvania proceedings and described Kohberger as calm, intelligent and aware of the seriousness of the situation. Kohberger decided not to fight extradition, appearing in court on January 3, 2023, and formally waiving his right to a lengthy extradition hearing so he could be returned quickly to Idaho. His family attended the proceeding and became emotional as he acknowledged the transfer. Pennsylvania authorities then turned him over for transport west, and he arrived back in Idaho on January 4, ending a brief but crucial period in Pennsylvania during which he went from spending the holidays at his parents’ home to being jailed as the accused killer in one of the country’s most closely watched murder cases.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2395bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-s-motion-to-exclude-evidence-seized-from-his-parents-home-9-19-26--75210626
In response, the State maintains that the search was conducted under a valid warrant issued by a Pennsylvania court, based on substantial probable cause. They argue that the affidavit supporting the warrant was sufficient and did not omit any material information that would invalidate the warrant. The State also contends that the "knock and announce" procedure was appropriately followed, and that Kohberger's statements during the search were either spontaneous or made after he was informed of his rights, thereby complying with legal requirements. Consequently, the State requests that the court deny Kohberger's motion to suppress the evidence obtained from the search at 119 Lamsden Drive and his subsequent statements.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

111424-REDACTED-Motion-Supress-Memorandum-Support-Lamsden-Statements.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75210626Sat, 19 Sep 2026 10:30:02 +0000Bobby Capucci​In the case identified as CR01-24-31665, defendant Bryan Kohberger has filed a motion to suppress evidence obtained from the execution of a Pennsylvania search warrant at 119 Lamsden Drive, Albrightsville, PA, as well as statements he made during...
In response, the State maintains that the search was conducted under a valid warrant issued by a Pennsylvania court, based on substantial probable cause. They argue that the affidavit supporting the warrant was sufficient and did not omit any material information that would invalidate the warrant. The State also contends that the "knock and announce" procedure was appropriately followed, and that Kohberger's statements during the search were either spontaneous or made after he was informed of his rights, thereby complying with legal requirements. Consequently, the State requests that the court deny Kohberger's motion to suppress the evidence obtained from the search at 119 Lamsden Drive and his subsequent statements.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

111424-REDACTED-Motion-Supress-Memorandum-Support-Lamsden-Statements.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1975bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-breaking-down-the-april-9th-2025-kohberger-hearings-9-19-26--75210933
Prosecutors, on the other hand, confirmed their intention to call several of Kohberger's family members as witnesses during the trial. They also sought to prevent the defense from suggesting Kohberger was framed and to prohibit portraying the state's pursuit of the death penalty as an attempt to kill him. Judge Steven Hippler addressed these motions, preliminarily ruling that terms like "psychopath," "sociopath," or "murderer" should not be used during the evidentiary phase. He also indicated that Kohberger's autism diagnosis could be presented as a mitigating factor if convicted but not as an aggravating one. Specific rulings on these motions are expected to be issued at a later date.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmal.com



source: 


Bryan Kohberger makes bombshell claim about TWO Idaho murders killers as judge considers if family will testify | Daily Mail Online

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75210933Sat, 19 Sep 2026 08:30:02 +0000Bobby Capucci​On April 9, 2025, Bryan Kohberger appeared in a Boise, Idaho court for a hearing addressing multiple pre-trial motions ahead of his upcoming trial for the 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students. The defense sought to exclude several pieces...
Prosecutors, on the other hand, confirmed their intention to call several of Kohberger's family members as witnesses during the trial. They also sought to prevent the defense from suggesting Kohberger was framed and to prohibit portraying the state's pursuit of the death penalty as an attempt to kill him. Judge Steven Hippler addressed these motions, preliminarily ruling that terms like "psychopath," "sociopath," or "murderer" should not be used during the evidentiary phase. He also indicated that Kohberger's autism diagnosis could be presented as a mitigating factor if convicted but not as an aggravating one. Specific rulings on these motions are expected to be issued at a later date.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmal.com



source: 


Bryan Kohberger makes bombshell claim about TWO Idaho murders killers as judge considers if family will testify | Daily Mail Online

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2206bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-dahmer-and-the-confession-tapes-9-19-26--75216271
Dahmer explained to detectives that he had begun killing in the late 1970s and that his crimes grew more methodical and grotesque over time. He spoke about his desire to create “zombies” by drilling into victims’ skulls and attempting to inject chemicals, a twisted effort to make them submissive and permanently under his control. His confessions painted a picture of a man consumed by obsession, driven by both sexual compulsion and a profound need for domination. The level of detail he provided gave law enforcement the clearest view into his psyche and the systematic way he carried out his murders, making his case one of the most infamous in modern criminal history.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

confession1.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75216271Sat, 19 Sep 2026 06:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciWhen Jeffrey Dahmer was finally caught in 1991, his confessions to detectives revealed the full horror of his crimes. He admitted in chilling detail that he had lured men and boys back to his apartment, where he drugged, strangled, and dismembered...
Dahmer explained to detectives that he had begun killing in the late 1970s and that his crimes grew more methodical and grotesque over time. He spoke about his desire to create “zombies” by drilling into victims’ skulls and attempting to inject chemicals, a twisted effort to make them submissive and permanently under his control. His confessions painted a picture of a man consumed by obsession, driven by both sexual compulsion and a profound need for domination. The level of detail he provided gave law enforcement the clearest view into his psyche and the systematic way he carried out his murders, making his case one of the most infamous in modern criminal history.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

confession1.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3759breakingnewsdaily,crime,murder,murderino,mystery,newsreports,podcast,podcastersofinstagram,serialkiller,serialkillers,ssdgm,truecrime,truecrimeaddict,truecrimecommunity,truecrimefan,truecrimejunkie,truecrimeobsessed,truecrimepodcast,unsolved,unsolvedmysteriestruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-judge-hippler-shoots-down-kohberger-s-alternate-perp-theory--75211087
Hippler said allowing the defense to build an alternate-perpetrator theory from those facts would invite “rank speculation” and risk sending jurors down irrelevant paths. He found no meaningful evidence that any of the four had a motive, the means to commit the murders or any actual connection to the crime scene, and rejected the defense’s argument that mere opportunity was enough. At the same time, he did not completely shut down scrutiny of the investigation. Kohberger’s attorneys were still allowed to question law-enforcement witnesses about whether investigators followed up on plausible leads and whether the investigation was thorough, but they could not accuse a specific person of being the killer without first showing the court admissible evidence directly connecting that person to the murders.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com







Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75211087Sat, 19 Sep 2026 04:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJudge Steven Hippler rejected Bryan Kohberger’s effort to present four unnamed people as possible alternate perpetrators in the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. Three of the individuals had social connections...
Hippler said allowing the defense to build an alternate-perpetrator theory from those facts would invite “rank speculation” and risk sending jurors down irrelevant paths. He found no meaningful evidence that any of the four had a motive, the means to commit the murders or any actual connection to the crime scene, and rejected the defense’s argument that mere opportunity was enough. At the same time, he did not completely shut down scrutiny of the investigation. Kohberger’s attorneys were still allowed to question law-enforcement witnesses about whether investigators followed up on plausible leads and whether the investigation was thorough, but they could not accuse a specific person of being the killer without first showing the court admissible evidence directly connecting that person to the murders.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com







Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>674bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-dylan-mortensen-faces-scrutiny-in-the-wake-of-the-murders--75211086In the weeks after the murders of Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, surviving roommate Dylan Mortensen was seen out in public and was photographed spending time with friends, something that quickly became fodder for online speculation. Images of Mortensen socializing after the killings were circulated by true-crime accounts and social-media users who treated her appearance and behavior as evidence that she was not grieving “correctly.” Some questioned how she could be seen smiling, going out or trying to resume ordinary parts of her life after surviving such a horrific event, while others folded those photographs into increasingly elaborate theories about her role in the case. None of that established wrongdoing. Mortensen was 19 years old, had been inside the King Road house while four of her friends were murdered and later became an important witness after telling investigators that she had seen a masked man leaving the home.


The criticism was unfair because it imposed an imaginary standard for how a traumatized survivor was supposed to behave in public. A photograph captured a fraction of a second and revealed nothing about what Mortensen was experiencing privately, yet online sleuths repeatedly treated normal activities as suspicious and used them to reinforce theories unsupported by evidence. The information vacuum surrounding the investigation made the problem worse, with rumors, accusations and amateur investigations spreading rapidly while police withheld details to protect the case. Mortensen’s delayed realization of what had happened inside the house already made her a target of intense scrutiny, and photographs taken afterward gave critics another way to dissect her behavior. Rather than showing anything sinister, the episode demonstrated how quickly a surviving witness could become a secondary target of an online true-crime culture determined to interpret every expression, outing and photograph as evidence.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75211086Sat, 19 Sep 2026 02:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn the weeks after the murders of Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, surviving roommate Dylan Mortensen was seen out in public and was photographed spending time with friends, something that quickly became fodder for...In the weeks after the murders of Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, surviving roommate Dylan Mortensen was seen out in public and was photographed spending time with friends, something that quickly became fodder for online speculation. Images of Mortensen socializing after the killings were circulated by true-crime accounts and social-media users who treated her appearance and behavior as evidence that she was not grieving “correctly.” Some questioned how she could be seen smiling, going out or trying to resume ordinary parts of her life after surviving such a horrific event, while others folded those photographs into increasingly elaborate theories about her role in the case. None of that established wrongdoing. Mortensen was 19 years old, had been inside the King Road house while four of her friends were murdered and later became an important witness after telling investigators that she had seen a masked man leaving the home.


The criticism was unfair because it imposed an imaginary standard for how a traumatized survivor was supposed to behave in public. A photograph captured a fraction of a second and revealed nothing about what Mortensen was experiencing privately, yet online sleuths repeatedly treated normal activities as suspicious and used them to reinforce theories unsupported by evidence. The information vacuum surrounding the investigation made the problem worse, with rumors, accusations and amateur investigations spreading rapidly while police withheld details to protect the case. Mortensen’s delayed realization of what had happened inside the house already made her a target of intense scrutiny, and photographs taken afterward gave critics another way to dissect her behavior. Rather than showing anything sinister, the episode demonstrated how quickly a surviving witness could become a secondary target of an online true-crime culture determined to interpret every expression, outing and photograph as evidence.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>730bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcripts-day-1-part-21-9-18-26--75189415
The defense spent much of the first day attacking the manner in which the prosecution was getting its evidence into the record rather than attempting to disprove the entire prosecution theory at that stage. Kathryn Nester and Robinson’s attorneys repeatedly raised hearsay, foundation and authentication objections, arguing that investigators were being permitted to introduce reports, statements and records created by other people without those individuals appearing personally to testify. Judge Graf overruled most of those objections, reflecting the substantially lower evidentiary threshold governing a Utah preliminary hearing, whose purpose was only to determine whether probable cause existed to send Robinson to trial rather than whether prosecutors could prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. One significant exception involved an edited compilation of surveillance footage, which Graf declined to admit in that form and required prosecutors to replace with the underlying unedited material. Hull’s testimony also revealed the scope of the prosecution’s surveillance theory: investigators claimed Robinson had appeared on or around the UVU campus multiple times on September 10 and that they were attempting to stitch those appearances together into a continuous identification of the alleged shooter. By the end of day one, prosecutors had established the killing itself, the medical cause of Kirk’s death, the existence and authenticity of substantial video evidence and the beginnings of their effort to identify Robinson as the person captured in that footage. They had not yet presented many of the pieces expected to become more consequential later in the hearing, including the rifle and DNA evidence, Robinson’s alleged communications and admissions, and testimony concerning his roommate Lance Twiggs.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75189415Sat, 19 Sep 2026 00:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay one of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing on July 6, 2026, largely centered on prosecutors beginning to construct a timeline of Charlie Kirk’s killing at Utah Valley University and establishing the authenticity of the surveillance footage and...
The defense spent much of the first day attacking the manner in which the prosecution was getting its evidence into the record rather than attempting to disprove the entire prosecution theory at that stage. Kathryn Nester and Robinson’s attorneys repeatedly raised hearsay, foundation and authentication objections, arguing that investigators were being permitted to introduce reports, statements and records created by other people without those individuals appearing personally to testify. Judge Graf overruled most of those objections, reflecting the substantially lower evidentiary threshold governing a Utah preliminary hearing, whose purpose was only to determine whether probable cause existed to send Robinson to trial rather than whether prosecutors could prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. One significant exception involved an edited compilation of surveillance footage, which Graf declined to admit in that form and required prosecutors to replace with the underlying unedited material. Hull’s testimony also revealed the scope of the prosecution’s surveillance theory: investigators claimed Robinson had appeared on or around the UVU campus multiple times on September 10 and that they were attempting to stitch those appearances together into a continuous identification of the alleged shooter. By the end of day one, prosecutors had established the killing itself, the medical cause of Kirk’s death, the existence and authenticity of substantial video evidence and the beginnings of their effort to identify Robinson as the person captured in that footage. They had not yet presented many of the pieces expected to become more consequential later in the hearing, including the rifle and DNA evidence, Robinson’s alleged communications and admissions, and testimony concerning his roommate Lance Twiggs.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>578breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcripts-day-1-part-20-9-18-26--75149342
The defense spent much of the first day attacking the manner in which the prosecution was getting its evidence into the record rather than attempting to disprove the entire prosecution theory at that stage. Kathryn Nester and Robinson’s attorneys repeatedly raised hearsay, foundation and authentication objections, arguing that investigators were being permitted to introduce reports, statements and records created by other people without those individuals appearing personally to testify. Judge Graf overruled most of those objections, reflecting the substantially lower evidentiary threshold governing a Utah preliminary hearing, whose purpose was only to determine whether probable cause existed to send Robinson to trial rather than whether prosecutors could prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. One significant exception involved an edited compilation of surveillance footage, which Graf declined to admit in that form and required prosecutors to replace with the underlying unedited material. Hull’s testimony also revealed the scope of the prosecution’s surveillance theory: investigators claimed Robinson had appeared on or around the UVU campus multiple times on September 10 and that they were attempting to stitch those appearances together into a continuous identification of the alleged shooter. By the end of day one, prosecutors had established the killing itself, the medical cause of Kirk’s death, the existence and authenticity of substantial video evidence and the beginnings of their effort to identify Robinson as the person captured in that footage. They had not yet presented many of the pieces expected to become more consequential later in the hearing, including the rifle and DNA evidence, Robinson’s alleged communications and admissions, and testimony concerning his roommate Lance Twiggs.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75149342Fri, 18 Sep 2026 22:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay one of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing on July 6, 2026, largely centered on prosecutors beginning to construct a timeline of Charlie Kirk’s killing at Utah Valley University and establishing the authenticity of the surveillance footage and...
The defense spent much of the first day attacking the manner in which the prosecution was getting its evidence into the record rather than attempting to disprove the entire prosecution theory at that stage. Kathryn Nester and Robinson’s attorneys repeatedly raised hearsay, foundation and authentication objections, arguing that investigators were being permitted to introduce reports, statements and records created by other people without those individuals appearing personally to testify. Judge Graf overruled most of those objections, reflecting the substantially lower evidentiary threshold governing a Utah preliminary hearing, whose purpose was only to determine whether probable cause existed to send Robinson to trial rather than whether prosecutors could prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. One significant exception involved an edited compilation of surveillance footage, which Graf declined to admit in that form and required prosecutors to replace with the underlying unedited material. Hull’s testimony also revealed the scope of the prosecution’s surveillance theory: investigators claimed Robinson had appeared on or around the UVU campus multiple times on September 10 and that they were attempting to stitch those appearances together into a continuous identification of the alleged shooter. By the end of day one, prosecutors had established the killing itself, the medical cause of Kirk’s death, the existence and authenticity of substantial video evidence and the beginnings of their effort to identify Robinson as the person captured in that footage. They had not yet presented many of the pieces expected to become more consequential later in the hearing, including the rifle and DNA evidence, Robinson’s alleged communications and admissions, and testimony concerning his roommate Lance Twiggs.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>814breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/hillary-clinton-and-the-transcript-from-her-epstein-related-talk-with-congress-part-11-9-17-26--75189412Hillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met Epstein, never flew on his plane, never visited Little St. James and knew nothing about his crimes before they became public. She described Maxwell as no more than a “casual acquaintance,” said she did not consider her a friend and attributed Maxwell’s presence around the Clinton family largely to her relationship with longtime Clinton friend Ted Waitt. Clinton acknowledged that Maxwell attended Chelsea Clinton’s 2010 wedding, but said she had no specific recollection of speaking with her there and believed Maxwell attended as Waitt’s guest. She also said she did not remember Maxwell visiting the Clintons’ Chappaqua home, despite Maxwell later saying she had been there several times, and said she had no knowledge of Epstein having connections to American or foreign intelligence services.

The questioning became much more contentious when lawmakers turned to Bill Clinton’s documented relationship with Epstein. Hillary characterized her husband’s relationship with Epstein as “limited” and primarily connected to his use of Epstein’s airplane, said she had no knowledge of Bill visiting Little St. James and maintained there was no evidence connecting him to Epstein’s crimes. When lawmakers pressed her about photographs showing Bill Clinton with Epstein, Maxwell and young women during trips, Clinton acknowledged seeing some of those photographs but said she had not become curious enough to investigate the circumstances herself, calling it simply “unfortunate” that her husband ever had dealings with Epstein. She also denied personally soliciting money from Epstein and said she was unaware of anyone doing so on her behalf, while acknowledging she knew little about whether Epstein played any role around Clinton Foundation or Clinton Global Initiative activities. The transcript therefore presented a consistent Clinton defense: she said she personally had essentially no relationship with Epstein and only a peripheral relationship with Maxwell, while repeatedly separating herself from questions about Bill Clinton by telling lawmakers that he would have to answer for his own conduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75189412Fri, 18 Sep 2026 20:30:03 +0000Bobby CapucciHillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met...Hillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met Epstein, never flew on his plane, never visited Little St. James and knew nothing about his crimes before they became public. She described Maxwell as no more than a “casual acquaintance,” said she did not consider her a friend and attributed Maxwell’s presence around the Clinton family largely to her relationship with longtime Clinton friend Ted Waitt. Clinton acknowledged that Maxwell attended Chelsea Clinton’s 2010 wedding, but said she had no specific recollection of speaking with her there and believed Maxwell attended as Waitt’s guest. She also said she did not remember Maxwell visiting the Clintons’ Chappaqua home, despite Maxwell later saying she had been there several times, and said she had no knowledge of Epstein having connections to American or foreign intelligence services.

The questioning became much more contentious when lawmakers turned to Bill Clinton’s documented relationship with Epstein. Hillary characterized her husband’s relationship with Epstein as “limited” and primarily connected to his use of Epstein’s airplane, said she had no knowledge of Bill visiting Little St. James and maintained there was no evidence connecting him to Epstein’s crimes. When lawmakers pressed her about photographs showing Bill Clinton with Epstein, Maxwell and young women during trips, Clinton acknowledged seeing some of those photographs but said she had not become curious enough to investigate the circumstances herself, calling it simply “unfortunate” that her husband ever had dealings with Epstein. She also denied personally soliciting money from Epstein and said she was unaware of anyone doing so on her behalf, while acknowledging she knew little about whether Epstein played any role around Clinton Foundation or Clinton Global Initiative activities. The transcript therefore presented a consistent Clinton defense: she said she personally had essentially no relationship with Epstein and only a peripheral relationship with Maxwell, while repeatedly separating herself from questions about Bill Clinton by telling lawmakers that he would have to answer for his own conduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>743epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/hillary-clinton-and-the-transcript-from-her-epstein-related-talk-with-congress-part-10-9-18-26--75191004https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75191004Fri, 18 Sep 2026 18:30:04 +0000Bobby Capucci969falsefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/police-expand-prince-andrew-investigation-to-his-security-detail-9-18-26--75189411
Investigators were expected to examine the credibility of Page’s account, compare it against other officers’ recollections and available security records, and determine whether the alleged visitor-log practices formed part of a wider pattern connected to Andrew’s association with Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The scrutiny went beyond palace visitors: British police were also reviewing material concerning Andrew’s travel, his official role as a trade envoy, allegations that confidential government information may have been shared with Epstein, and whether UK airports or royal security arrangements intersected with Epstein-linked trafficking activity. Three forces were conducting live Epstein-related inquiries, while a national police review was assessing whether newly released U.S. files pointed to broader violence, exploitation or trafficking in Britain. The central question was therefore shifting from Andrew’s personal relationship with Epstein to what people around him, including sworn protection officers, may have witnessed and whether those observations were ever properly recorded or acted upon.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

What Andrew-Epstein police will examine next as they appeal to protection officers

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75189411Fri, 18 Sep 2026 16:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBritish investigators were continuing to expand their examination of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein by reaching out to current and former royal protection officers who may have witnessed relevant conduct while assigned...
Investigators were expected to examine the credibility of Page’s account, compare it against other officers’ recollections and available security records, and determine whether the alleged visitor-log practices formed part of a wider pattern connected to Andrew’s association with Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The scrutiny went beyond palace visitors: British police were also reviewing material concerning Andrew’s travel, his official role as a trade envoy, allegations that confidential government information may have been shared with Epstein, and whether UK airports or royal security arrangements intersected with Epstein-linked trafficking activity. Three forces were conducting live Epstein-related inquiries, while a national police review was assessing whether newly released U.S. files pointed to broader violence, exploitation or trafficking in Britain. The central question was therefore shifting from Andrew’s personal relationship with Epstein to what people around him, including sworn protection officers, may have witnessed and whether those observations were ever properly recorded or acted upon.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

What Andrew-Epstein police will examine next as they appeal to protection officers

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>693epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/new-lawsuit-targets-epstein-estate-over-photos-of-underage-girls-9-18-26--75189413Two women identified in court papers as Jane Doe and Amy filed a proposed federal class-action lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein’s estate, alleging that their photographs were among a large collection of child sexual abuse material found in Epstein’s possession. The lawsuit claims Epstein and unnamed co-conspirators maintained a “modeling book” containing nude or partially nude sexualized images of children and that the collection formed part of a broader, decades-long pattern of possessing, transporting, producing and distributing illegal material. Jane Doe alleged that Epstein obtained partially nude photographs of her when she was about 12 years old, while Amy alleged that pornographic images of her, known as the “Misty” series, were also found among materials seized from Epstein’s properties. No CSAM charges were ever brought against Epstein, and the estate’s co-executors, Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, were named as defendants in their roles administering the estate.

The lawsuit also accused authorities and the estate of failing to identify and notify many of the women and girls whose images were found in Epstein’s files. The plaintiffs said “few if any” of the people depicted were told that federal investigators possessed their photographs and asked the court to establish a coordinated, supervised process to identify and notify other potential victims. Their attorneys argued that the issue represented a largely unresolved part of the Epstein scandal, separate from the trafficking charges that received most of the public attention. The suit sought class-action status, unspecified damages and a formal accounting and preservation of the materials, with lawyers saying survivors deserved to know whether their images were in Epstein’s collection and to have an opportunity to seek legal redress.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com





source:

Women sue Epstein’s estate, saying their photos were found in his vast child porn collection

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75189413Fri, 18 Sep 2026 14:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciTwo women identified in court papers as Jane Doe and Amy filed a proposed federal class-action lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein’s estate, alleging that their photographs were among a large collection of child sexual abuse material found in Epstein’s...Two women identified in court papers as Jane Doe and Amy filed a proposed federal class-action lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein’s estate, alleging that their photographs were among a large collection of child sexual abuse material found in Epstein’s possession. The lawsuit claims Epstein and unnamed co-conspirators maintained a “modeling book” containing nude or partially nude sexualized images of children and that the collection formed part of a broader, decades-long pattern of possessing, transporting, producing and distributing illegal material. Jane Doe alleged that Epstein obtained partially nude photographs of her when she was about 12 years old, while Amy alleged that pornographic images of her, known as the “Misty” series, were also found among materials seized from Epstein’s properties. No CSAM charges were ever brought against Epstein, and the estate’s co-executors, Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, were named as defendants in their roles administering the estate.

The lawsuit also accused authorities and the estate of failing to identify and notify many of the women and girls whose images were found in Epstein’s files. The plaintiffs said “few if any” of the people depicted were told that federal investigators possessed their photographs and asked the court to establish a coordinated, supervised process to identify and notify other potential victims. Their attorneys argued that the issue represented a largely unresolved part of the Epstein scandal, separate from the trafficking charges that received most of the public attention. The suit sought class-action status, unspecified damages and a formal accounting and preservation of the materials, with lawyers saying survivors deserved to know whether their images were in Epstein’s collection and to have an opportunity to seek legal redress.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com





source:

Women sue Epstein’s estate, saying their photos were found in his vast child porn collection

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>810epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/congress-uses-unanimous-consent-to-hold-leon-black-in-contempt-9-18-26--75189410Congress escalated its confrontation with Leon Black on September 16, 2026, when the House voted by unanimous consent to hold the billionaire former Apollo CEO in criminal contempt of Congress for refusing to comply with subpoenas tied to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. The House Oversight Committee had demanded that Black produce nondisclosure agreements in his possession, including any that referenced Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell, and sit for a sworn deposition. Black had earlier walked out of a voluntary interview after refusing to answer questions about NDAs, then sued the committee rather than comply with the subpoenas. Black has said he knew nothing about Epstein’s sexual abuse and has argued that Congress is overreaching and lacks a valid legislative purpose for seeking such sweeping private records. His attorneys also contend the committee is demanding information that does not exist and is trying to pry into NDAs unrelated to Epstein.


At the same time, Oversight Chairman James Comer introduced the Survivor’s Voice Protection Act, legislation aimed directly at the use of NDAs in sexual-abuse cases. The bill would void confidentiality provisions that prevent survivors from speaking about abuse and would also allow other people with relevant information to disclose facts about that abuse. The move came after reporting that some Epstein accusers had signed confidential settlements with associates of Epstein whom they had also accused of misconduct. Comer said the investigation had shown how powerful men could use NDAs to silence survivors, making Black’s refusal to produce his agreements part of a larger congressional fight over secrecy in the Epstein network. The contempt vote now allows House Speaker Mike Johnson to send a criminal referral to the Justice Department, while Black’s lawsuit against the committee continues separately in federal court.







to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Congress Battles Jeffrey Epstein Patron Leon Black Over NDAs - Business Insider



Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75189410Fri, 18 Sep 2026 12:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciCongress escalated its confrontation with Leon Black on September 16, 2026, when the House voted by unanimous consent to hold the billionaire former Apollo CEO in criminal contempt of Congress for refusing to comply with subpoenas tied to the Jeffrey...Congress escalated its confrontation with Leon Black on September 16, 2026, when the House voted by unanimous consent to hold the billionaire former Apollo CEO in criminal contempt of Congress for refusing to comply with subpoenas tied to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. The House Oversight Committee had demanded that Black produce nondisclosure agreements in his possession, including any that referenced Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell, and sit for a sworn deposition. Black had earlier walked out of a voluntary interview after refusing to answer questions about NDAs, then sued the committee rather than comply with the subpoenas. Black has said he knew nothing about Epstein’s sexual abuse and has argued that Congress is overreaching and lacks a valid legislative purpose for seeking such sweeping private records. His attorneys also contend the committee is demanding information that does not exist and is trying to pry into NDAs unrelated to Epstein.


At the same time, Oversight Chairman James Comer introduced the Survivor’s Voice Protection Act, legislation aimed directly at the use of NDAs in sexual-abuse cases. The bill would void confidentiality provisions that prevent survivors from speaking about abuse and would also allow other people with relevant information to disclose facts about that abuse. The move came after reporting that some Epstein accusers had signed confidential settlements with associates of Epstein whom they had also accused of misconduct. Comer said the investigation had shown how powerful men could use NDAs to silence survivors, making Black’s refusal to produce his agreements part of a larger congressional fight over secrecy in the Epstein network. The contempt vote now allows House Speaker Mike Johnson to send a criminal referral to the Justice Department, while Black’s lawsuit against the committee continues separately in federal court.







to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Congress Battles Jeffrey Epstein Patron Leon Black Over NDAs - Business Insider



Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>678epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-goncalves-family-and-their-pursuit-of-justice-for-kaylee-9-18-26--75187787In the aftermath of the murders, Kaylee Goncalves’s family became the most outspoken of the four victims’ families, repeatedly pushing investigators, prosecutors and the media for answers while demanding that Kaylee’s case never fade into the background. Steve and Kristi Goncalves gave frequent interviews, challenged early statements from law enforcement, questioned whether investigators were moving quickly enough and openly expressed frustration when they believed information was being withheld from them. They hired attorney Shanon Gray to represent the family, fought for greater access to court proceedings and information, and continued speaking publicly even when prosecutors and judges urged restraint because of the pending case. Their approach sometimes put them at odds with authorities, but the family consistently said their goal was simple: keep pressure on the system, force accountability and make sure Kaylee and the other victims remained at the center of the story.

That advocacy continued after Bryan Kohberger’s arrest and through the years of pretrial litigation, with the Goncalves family closely following hearings, evidence disputes, venue changes, gag-order battles and the death-penalty case. They were especially vocal about the importance of a full public accounting of what happened and repeatedly resisted efforts they believed would reduce transparency or limit the families’ voices. Their public posture was more aggressive than that of some other families connected to the case, and that made them both influential and controversial figures in the broader Moscow murders story. Through it all, the Goncalves family framed their outspokenness as part of their responsibility to Kaylee, arguing that if they did not keep demanding answers and accountability, nobody else could be expected to fight for her with the same intensity.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75187787Fri, 18 Sep 2026 10:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn the aftermath of the murders, Kaylee Goncalves’s family became the most outspoken of the four victims’ families, repeatedly pushing investigators, prosecutors and the media for answers while demanding that Kaylee’s case never fade into the...In the aftermath of the murders, Kaylee Goncalves’s family became the most outspoken of the four victims’ families, repeatedly pushing investigators, prosecutors and the media for answers while demanding that Kaylee’s case never fade into the background. Steve and Kristi Goncalves gave frequent interviews, challenged early statements from law enforcement, questioned whether investigators were moving quickly enough and openly expressed frustration when they believed information was being withheld from them. They hired attorney Shanon Gray to represent the family, fought for greater access to court proceedings and information, and continued speaking publicly even when prosecutors and judges urged restraint because of the pending case. Their approach sometimes put them at odds with authorities, but the family consistently said their goal was simple: keep pressure on the system, force accountability and make sure Kaylee and the other victims remained at the center of the story.

That advocacy continued after Bryan Kohberger’s arrest and through the years of pretrial litigation, with the Goncalves family closely following hearings, evidence disputes, venue changes, gag-order battles and the death-penalty case. They were especially vocal about the importance of a full public accounting of what happened and repeatedly resisted efforts they believed would reduce transparency or limit the families’ voices. Their public posture was more aggressive than that of some other families connected to the case, and that made them both influential and controversial figures in the broader Moscow murders story. Through it all, the Goncalves family framed their outspokenness as part of their responsibility to Kaylee, arguing that if they did not keep demanding answers and accountability, nobody else could be expected to fight for her with the same intensity.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2669bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-the-declarations-in-support-of-his-innocence-9-18-26--75187785

Grace Wong’s declaration served a different purpose. As a Court TV representative, she supported the media coalition opposing the defense request to remove cameras from the courtroom, explaining that Court TV had followed Judge John Judge’s restrictions, used a variety of courtroom shots and could adjust its coverage to comply with even more specific limitations without eliminating cameras altogether. Her declaration therefore did not support Kohberger’s innocence or challenge the forensic case against him; it addressed courtroom access and argued that responsible camera coverage could coexist with Kohberger’s right to a fair trial. Taken together, the declarations illustrated how many separate fronts were being litigated before trial: Ray challenged aspects of the cellphone evidence, Vargas and Mercer pressed for deeper disclosure of the genetic-genealogy process, while Wong addressed the public-access fight surrounding one of the most heavily covered criminal cases in the country.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75187785Fri, 18 Sep 2026 08:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBryan Kohberger’s defense relied on a series of declarations from experts and outside professionals to challenge different parts of the State’s case and to support requests for greater access to evidence. Sy Ray, a former law-enforcement investigator...

Grace Wong’s declaration served a different purpose. As a Court TV representative, she supported the media coalition opposing the defense request to remove cameras from the courtroom, explaining that Court TV had followed Judge John Judge’s restrictions, used a variety of courtroom shots and could adjust its coverage to comply with even more specific limitations without eliminating cameras altogether. Her declaration therefore did not support Kohberger’s innocence or challenge the forensic case against him; it addressed courtroom access and argued that responsible camera coverage could coexist with Kohberger’s right to a fair trial. Taken together, the declarations illustrated how many separate fronts were being litigated before trial: Ray challenged aspects of the cellphone evidence, Vargas and Mercer pressed for deeper disclosure of the genetic-genealogy process, while Wong addressed the public-access fight surrounding one of the most heavily covered criminal cases in the country.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3205bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-amended-warrants-for-doordash-amazon-and-youtube-9-17-26--75187786
The Amazon warrant was more directly tied to the suspected murder weapon. Investigators sought Kohberger’s click activity involving knives and accessories, payment methods, items placed into or removed from shopping carts, wish-list activity, reviews he viewed, advertising data and devices associated with the account. The warrant covered March 20 through March 30, 2022, and November 1 through December 6, 2022, and was amended in May 2023 after investigators discovered a date error in the original paperwork. Amazon later returned responsive data, which was placed into evidence. Taken together, the three warrants showed investigators trying to build a digital timeline from several directions at once: DoorDash for the final activity at the house, YouTube for online and device behavior, and Amazon for possible interest in or acquisition of a knife and related equipment.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75187786Fri, 18 Sep 2026 06:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe amended warrants for YouTube, DoorDash and Amazon showed how investigators in the Moscow murders were using digital records to reconstruct both Bryan Kohberger’s activity and the movements surrounding 1122 King Road. The DoorDash warrant focused...
The Amazon warrant was more directly tied to the suspected murder weapon. Investigators sought Kohberger’s click activity involving knives and accessories, payment methods, items placed into or removed from shopping carts, wish-list activity, reviews he viewed, advertising data and devices associated with the account. The warrant covered March 20 through March 30, 2022, and November 1 through December 6, 2022, and was amended in May 2023 after investigators discovered a date error in the original paperwork. Amazon later returned responsive data, which was placed into evidence. Taken together, the three warrants showed investigators trying to build a digital timeline from several directions at once: DoorDash for the final activity at the house, YouTube for online and device behavior, and Amazon for possible interest in or acquisition of a knife and related equipment.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2841epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-moscow-and-the-1-4-million-dollar-hole--75187540The murders of Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin created an extraordinary financial burden for Moscow and the University of Idaho because neither was built to absorb the costs of a massive quadruple-homicide investigation and its aftermath. Moscow officials quickly began shifting money and personnel toward the police department to cover overtime, forensic work, communications staff and other investigative expenses, while Idaho State Police poured personnel into the case and the FBI assisted at the federal level. Gov. Brad Little made up to $1 million in emergency funding available, but local officials still warned that the investigation was straining a city with a relatively small tax base. By 2024, known law-enforcement costs tied to the investigation alone had reached at least $740,000, while Moscow’s own added expenses eventually totaled about $140,000 after reimbursements and other state assistance were factored in.

The much larger $1.4 million figure was tied primarily to the University of Idaho’s security response rather than Moscow city government itself. The university spent roughly $1.4 million expanding security on and around campus after the murders, including Idaho State Police patrols, private security firms and increased university security staffing. It also absorbed hundreds of thousands of dollars securing and maintaining the King Road house before its demolition. The Idaho Legislature later appropriated $1 million to help offset those unexpected costs, but the overall financial impact kept climbing as the investigation turned into a capital murder prosecution. What began as a local homicide investigation therefore became a multimillion-dollar public expense stretching across the city, university, state police, prosecutors and defense system long before Bryan Kohberger’s case ever approached trial.












to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com









Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75187540Fri, 18 Sep 2026 04:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe murders of Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin created an extraordinary financial burden for Moscow and the University of Idaho because neither was built to absorb the costs of a massive quadruple-homicide investigation...The murders of Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin created an extraordinary financial burden for Moscow and the University of Idaho because neither was built to absorb the costs of a massive quadruple-homicide investigation and its aftermath. Moscow officials quickly began shifting money and personnel toward the police department to cover overtime, forensic work, communications staff and other investigative expenses, while Idaho State Police poured personnel into the case and the FBI assisted at the federal level. Gov. Brad Little made up to $1 million in emergency funding available, but local officials still warned that the investigation was straining a city with a relatively small tax base. By 2024, known law-enforcement costs tied to the investigation alone had reached at least $740,000, while Moscow’s own added expenses eventually totaled about $140,000 after reimbursements and other state assistance were factored in.

The much larger $1.4 million figure was tied primarily to the University of Idaho’s security response rather than Moscow city government itself. The university spent roughly $1.4 million expanding security on and around campus after the murders, including Idaho State Police patrols, private security firms and increased university security staffing. It also absorbed hundreds of thousands of dollars securing and maintaining the King Road house before its demolition. The Idaho Legislature later appropriated $1 million to help offset those unexpected costs, but the overall financial impact kept climbing as the investigation turned into a capital murder prosecution. What began as a local homicide investigation therefore became a multimillion-dollar public expense stretching across the city, university, state police, prosecutors and defense system long before Bryan Kohberger’s case ever approached trial.












to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com









Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>690bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-kristi-goncalves-and-her-interview-with-news-nation--75187501Kaylee Goncalves’s mother, Kristi Goncalves, said she was angered and physically sickened by seeing Bryan Kohberger appear in court wearing a suit and tie rather than the orange jail uniform he had worn at earlier hearings. She argued that the polished appearance softened the reality of what he was accused of and gave him an image she believed he had not earned. Kristi said it was difficult for the victims’ families to watch Kohberger arrive freshly groomed and dressed in civilian clothes while their children were dead and unable to enjoy any of the ordinary privileges of life. Her husband, Steve Goncalves, similarly questioned what he saw as unusual pretrial treatment, including Kohberger’s suits and his ability to appear without handcuffs in court.

The Goncalves family wanted the court to reconsider those accommodations and treat Kohberger more like other jail inmates during pretrial appearances. Their frustration reflected a broader concern they repeatedly voiced throughout the case: that the legal system was carefully protecting Kohberger’s rights while the victims and their families were forced to live with the consequences of the murders. Kohberger’s defense, however, had a constitutional basis for requesting civilian clothing, because courts have long recognized that forcing a defendant to appear before a jury in jail attire can prejudice the presumption of innocence. At that stage of the case, Kohberger had not yet been convicted, so the dispute became another example of the tension between protecting a defendant’s fair-trial rights and the emotional reality confronting the Goncalves family every time they entered the courtroom.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75187501Fri, 18 Sep 2026 02:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciKaylee Goncalves’s mother, Kristi Goncalves, said she was angered and physically sickened by seeing Bryan Kohberger appear in court wearing a suit and tie rather than the orange jail uniform he had worn at earlier hearings. She argued that the...Kaylee Goncalves’s mother, Kristi Goncalves, said she was angered and physically sickened by seeing Bryan Kohberger appear in court wearing a suit and tie rather than the orange jail uniform he had worn at earlier hearings. She argued that the polished appearance softened the reality of what he was accused of and gave him an image she believed he had not earned. Kristi said it was difficult for the victims’ families to watch Kohberger arrive freshly groomed and dressed in civilian clothes while their children were dead and unable to enjoy any of the ordinary privileges of life. Her husband, Steve Goncalves, similarly questioned what he saw as unusual pretrial treatment, including Kohberger’s suits and his ability to appear without handcuffs in court.

The Goncalves family wanted the court to reconsider those accommodations and treat Kohberger more like other jail inmates during pretrial appearances. Their frustration reflected a broader concern they repeatedly voiced throughout the case: that the legal system was carefully protecting Kohberger’s rights while the victims and their families were forced to live with the consequences of the murders. Kohberger’s defense, however, had a constitutional basis for requesting civilian clothing, because courts have long recognized that forcing a defendant to appear before a jury in jail attire can prejudice the presumption of innocence. At that stage of the case, Kohberger had not yet been convicted, so the dispute became another example of the tension between protecting a defendant’s fair-trial rights and the emotional reality confronting the Goncalves family every time they entered the courtroom.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>753bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/hillary-clinton-and-the-transcript-from-her-epstein-related-talk-with-congress-part-9-9-17-26--75174564Hillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met Epstein, never flew on his plane, never visited Little St. James and knew nothing about his crimes before they became public. She described Maxwell as no more than a “casual acquaintance,” said she did not consider her a friend and attributed Maxwell’s presence around the Clinton family largely to her relationship with longtime Clinton friend Ted Waitt. Clinton acknowledged that Maxwell attended Chelsea Clinton’s 2010 wedding, but said she had no specific recollection of speaking with her there and believed Maxwell attended as Waitt’s guest. She also said she did not remember Maxwell visiting the Clintons’ Chappaqua home, despite Maxwell later saying she had been there several times, and said she had no knowledge of Epstein having connections to American or foreign intelligence services.

The questioning became much more contentious when lawmakers turned to Bill Clinton’s documented relationship with Epstein. Hillary characterized her husband’s relationship with Epstein as “limited” and primarily connected to his use of Epstein’s airplane, said she had no knowledge of Bill visiting Little St. James and maintained there was no evidence connecting him to Epstein’s crimes. When lawmakers pressed her about photographs showing Bill Clinton with Epstein, Maxwell and young women during trips, Clinton acknowledged seeing some of those photographs but said she had not become curious enough to investigate the circumstances herself, calling it simply “unfortunate” that her husband ever had dealings with Epstein. She also denied personally soliciting money from Epstein and said she was unaware of anyone doing so on her behalf, while acknowledging she knew little about whether Epstein played any role around Clinton Foundation or Clinton Global Initiative activities. The transcript therefore presented a consistent Clinton defense: she said she personally had essentially no relationship with Epstein and only a peripheral relationship with Maxwell, while repeatedly separating herself from questions about Bill Clinton by telling lawmakers that he would have to answer for his own conduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75174564Fri, 18 Sep 2026 00:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciHillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met...Hillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met Epstein, never flew on his plane, never visited Little St. James and knew nothing about his crimes before they became public. She described Maxwell as no more than a “casual acquaintance,” said she did not consider her a friend and attributed Maxwell’s presence around the Clinton family largely to her relationship with longtime Clinton friend Ted Waitt. Clinton acknowledged that Maxwell attended Chelsea Clinton’s 2010 wedding, but said she had no specific recollection of speaking with her there and believed Maxwell attended as Waitt’s guest. She also said she did not remember Maxwell visiting the Clintons’ Chappaqua home, despite Maxwell later saying she had been there several times, and said she had no knowledge of Epstein having connections to American or foreign intelligence services.

The questioning became much more contentious when lawmakers turned to Bill Clinton’s documented relationship with Epstein. Hillary characterized her husband’s relationship with Epstein as “limited” and primarily connected to his use of Epstein’s airplane, said she had no knowledge of Bill visiting Little St. James and maintained there was no evidence connecting him to Epstein’s crimes. When lawmakers pressed her about photographs showing Bill Clinton with Epstein, Maxwell and young women during trips, Clinton acknowledged seeing some of those photographs but said she had not become curious enough to investigate the circumstances herself, calling it simply “unfortunate” that her husband ever had dealings with Epstein. She also denied personally soliciting money from Epstein and said she was unaware of anyone doing so on her behalf, while acknowledging she knew little about whether Epstein played any role around Clinton Foundation or Clinton Global Initiative activities. The transcript therefore presented a consistent Clinton defense: she said she personally had essentially no relationship with Epstein and only a peripheral relationship with Maxwell, while repeatedly separating herself from questions about Bill Clinton by telling lawmakers that he would have to answer for his own conduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>795epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/hillary-clinton-and-the-transcript-from-her-epstein-related-talk-with-congress-part-8-9-17-26--75174566Hillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met Epstein, never flew on his plane, never visited Little St. James and knew nothing about his crimes before they became public. She described Maxwell as no more than a “casual acquaintance,” said she did not consider her a friend and attributed Maxwell’s presence around the Clinton family largely to her relationship with longtime Clinton friend Ted Waitt. Clinton acknowledged that Maxwell attended Chelsea Clinton’s 2010 wedding, but said she had no specific recollection of speaking with her there and believed Maxwell attended as Waitt’s guest. She also said she did not remember Maxwell visiting the Clintons’ Chappaqua home, despite Maxwell later saying she had been there several times, and said she had no knowledge of Epstein having connections to American or foreign intelligence services.

The questioning became much more contentious when lawmakers turned to Bill Clinton’s documented relationship with Epstein. Hillary characterized her husband’s relationship with Epstein as “limited” and primarily connected to his use of Epstein’s airplane, said she had no knowledge of Bill visiting Little St. James and maintained there was no evidence connecting him to Epstein’s crimes. When lawmakers pressed her about photographs showing Bill Clinton with Epstein, Maxwell and young women during trips, Clinton acknowledged seeing some of those photographs but said she had not become curious enough to investigate the circumstances herself, calling it simply “unfortunate” that her husband ever had dealings with Epstein. She also denied personally soliciting money from Epstein and said she was unaware of anyone doing so on her behalf, while acknowledging she knew little about whether Epstein played any role around Clinton Foundation or Clinton Global Initiative activities. The transcript therefore presented a consistent Clinton defense: she said she personally had essentially no relationship with Epstein and only a peripheral relationship with Maxwell, while repeatedly separating herself from questions about Bill Clinton by telling lawmakers that he would have to answer for his own conduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75174566Thu, 17 Sep 2026 22:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciHillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met...Hillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met Epstein, never flew on his plane, never visited Little St. James and knew nothing about his crimes before they became public. She described Maxwell as no more than a “casual acquaintance,” said she did not consider her a friend and attributed Maxwell’s presence around the Clinton family largely to her relationship with longtime Clinton friend Ted Waitt. Clinton acknowledged that Maxwell attended Chelsea Clinton’s 2010 wedding, but said she had no specific recollection of speaking with her there and believed Maxwell attended as Waitt’s guest. She also said she did not remember Maxwell visiting the Clintons’ Chappaqua home, despite Maxwell later saying she had been there several times, and said she had no knowledge of Epstein having connections to American or foreign intelligence services.

The questioning became much more contentious when lawmakers turned to Bill Clinton’s documented relationship with Epstein. Hillary characterized her husband’s relationship with Epstein as “limited” and primarily connected to his use of Epstein’s airplane, said she had no knowledge of Bill visiting Little St. James and maintained there was no evidence connecting him to Epstein’s crimes. When lawmakers pressed her about photographs showing Bill Clinton with Epstein, Maxwell and young women during trips, Clinton acknowledged seeing some of those photographs but said she had not become curious enough to investigate the circumstances herself, calling it simply “unfortunate” that her husband ever had dealings with Epstein. She also denied personally soliciting money from Epstein and said she was unaware of anyone doing so on her behalf, while acknowledging she knew little about whether Epstein played any role around Clinton Foundation or Clinton Global Initiative activities. The transcript therefore presented a consistent Clinton defense: she said she personally had essentially no relationship with Epstein and only a peripheral relationship with Maxwell, while repeatedly separating herself from questions about Bill Clinton by telling lawmakers that he would have to answer for his own conduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>784epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/wrongful-death-claim-targets-utah-over-charlie-kirk-security-failures-9-17-26--75174563
The claim also alleged that there were no first responders immediately positioned to treat Kirk after he was shot, forcing him to be taken to a hospital in a private vehicle rather than an ambulance. Kirk’s attorneys argued that the danger of a rooftop attack should have been especially apparent after the attempted assassination of Donald Trump by a rooftop gunman the previous year. UVU said it would respond through its established procedures and noted that it had since begun expanding its police force, while the Utah Attorney General’s Office declined to comment on potential litigation. The filing did not specify how much money the family might ultimately seek, but under Utah law the notice was a prerequisite to bringing a formal negligence or wrongful-death lawsuit. The criminal case against Tyler Robinson remained separate, with Robinson charged with aggravated murder and facing the possibility of the death penalty if convicted.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Charlie Kirk's family says security failures by Utah officials led to his assassination

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75174563Thu, 17 Sep 2026 20:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciCharlie Kirk’s family took the first formal step toward a wrongful-death lawsuit against Utah officials, alleging that a series of security failures at Utah Valley University left him vulnerable to the rooftop gunman who killed him on September 10,...
The claim also alleged that there were no first responders immediately positioned to treat Kirk after he was shot, forcing him to be taken to a hospital in a private vehicle rather than an ambulance. Kirk’s attorneys argued that the danger of a rooftop attack should have been especially apparent after the attempted assassination of Donald Trump by a rooftop gunman the previous year. UVU said it would respond through its established procedures and noted that it had since begun expanding its police force, while the Utah Attorney General’s Office declined to comment on potential litigation. The filing did not specify how much money the family might ultimately seek, but under Utah law the notice was a prerequisite to bringing a formal negligence or wrongful-death lawsuit. The criminal case against Tyler Robinson remained separate, with Robinson charged with aggravated murder and facing the possibility of the death penalty if convicted.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Charlie Kirk's family says security failures by Utah officials led to his assassination

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>630breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-bryan-kohberger-s-family-backs-his-challenge-to-the-guilty-plea-9-17-26--75187459

The effort has also brought renewed attention to arguments from forensic criminologist Brent Turvey, who had been retained by Kohberger’s defense before the plea. Turvey told ABC News that Kohberger and his family were not fully informed about evidence he believed supported the defense, including concerns about how the knife sheath was handled, FBI hair analysis that he said excluded Kohberger, and weaknesses he saw in the cellphone and vehicle-location evidence. Kohberger has separately asked for Judge Steven Hippler to be removed from the post-conviction proceedings, citing harsh comments Hippler made at sentencing, and has asked that the case be returned to Latah County. A hearing on the judge and venue requests is scheduled for October 15, 2026, while the evidentiary hearing on Kohberger’s post-conviction petition is set for June 17, 2027.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Bryan Kohberger's family says they support his attempt to challenge conviction - ABC News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75187459Thu, 17 Sep 2026 18:30:05 +0000Bobby CapucciBryan Kohberger’s family publicly backed his effort to undo the guilty plea that resulted in four consecutive life sentences for the murders of Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. In a statement to ABC News, the family...

The effort has also brought renewed attention to arguments from forensic criminologist Brent Turvey, who had been retained by Kohberger’s defense before the plea. Turvey told ABC News that Kohberger and his family were not fully informed about evidence he believed supported the defense, including concerns about how the knife sheath was handled, FBI hair analysis that he said excluded Kohberger, and weaknesses he saw in the cellphone and vehicle-location evidence. Kohberger has separately asked for Judge Steven Hippler to be removed from the post-conviction proceedings, citing harsh comments Hippler made at sentencing, and has asked that the case be returned to Latah County. A hearing on the judge and venue requests is scheduled for October 15, 2026, while the evidentiary hearing on Kohberger’s post-conviction petition is set for June 17, 2027.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Bryan Kohberger's family says they support his attempt to challenge conviction - ABC News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1013epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-clinton-epstein-depositions-and-the-failure-of-congressional-oversight-part-2-9-17-26--75174565
The Clinton depositions also highlight a larger credibility problem for Congress, which spends months demanding testimony and threatening contempt proceedings only to allow partisan loyalty to dominate the questioning once witnesses finally appear. The committee releases hours of Clinton deposition video while providing searchable written transcripts for numerous other Epstein-related witnesses, making independent examination of the Clinton testimony more difficult and leaving the public increasingly dependent on selectively edited clips and partisan summaries. Instead of methodically comparing testimony with flight records, photographs, calendars, communications, financial records, and other evidence, lawmakers repeatedly turn the investigation into another battle between Democrats and Republicans. That approach does little for survivors and even less to explain how Epstein maintained access to powerful people and institutions for so long. Bill and Hillary Clinton should not receive harsher treatment because of who they are, but neither should political allies shield them from the same level of scrutiny applied to other witnesses. Congress claims that nobody is above investigation, yet the Clinton depositions raise an uncomfortable question about whether lawmakers are willing to apply that principle when the witness belongs to their own political camp.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75174565Thu, 17 Sep 2026 16:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe congressional depositions of Bill and Hillary Clinton expose a broader problem with the House investigation into Jeffrey Epstein: lawmakers appear to apply different levels of scrutiny depending on the political identity of the witness. Democratic...
The Clinton depositions also highlight a larger credibility problem for Congress, which spends months demanding testimony and threatening contempt proceedings only to allow partisan loyalty to dominate the questioning once witnesses finally appear. The committee releases hours of Clinton deposition video while providing searchable written transcripts for numerous other Epstein-related witnesses, making independent examination of the Clinton testimony more difficult and leaving the public increasingly dependent on selectively edited clips and partisan summaries. Instead of methodically comparing testimony with flight records, photographs, calendars, communications, financial records, and other evidence, lawmakers repeatedly turn the investigation into another battle between Democrats and Republicans. That approach does little for survivors and even less to explain how Epstein maintained access to powerful people and institutions for so long. Bill and Hillary Clinton should not receive harsher treatment because of who they are, but neither should political allies shield them from the same level of scrutiny applied to other witnesses. Congress claims that nobody is above investigation, yet the Clinton depositions raise an uncomfortable question about whether lawmakers are willing to apply that principle when the witness belongs to their own political camp.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>983epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-clinton-epstein-depositions-and-the-failure-of-congressional-oversight-part-1-9-17-26--75174562
The Clinton depositions also highlight a larger credibility problem for Congress, which spends months demanding testimony and threatening contempt proceedings only to allow partisan loyalty to dominate the questioning once witnesses finally appear. The committee releases hours of Clinton deposition video while providing searchable written transcripts for numerous other Epstein-related witnesses, making independent examination of the Clinton testimony more difficult and leaving the public increasingly dependent on selectively edited clips and partisan summaries. Instead of methodically comparing testimony with flight records, photographs, calendars, communications, financial records, and other evidence, lawmakers repeatedly turn the investigation into another battle between Democrats and Republicans. That approach does little for survivors and even less to explain how Epstein maintained access to powerful people and institutions for so long. Bill and Hillary Clinton should not receive harsher treatment because of who they are, but neither should political allies shield them from the same level of scrutiny applied to other witnesses. Congress claims that nobody is above investigation, yet the Clinton depositions raise an uncomfortable question about whether lawmakers are willing to apply that principle when the witness belongs to their own political camp.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75174562Thu, 17 Sep 2026 14:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe congressional depositions of Bill and Hillary Clinton expose a broader problem with the House investigation into Jeffrey Epstein: lawmakers appear to apply different levels of scrutiny depending on the political identity of the witness. Democratic...
The Clinton depositions also highlight a larger credibility problem for Congress, which spends months demanding testimony and threatening contempt proceedings only to allow partisan loyalty to dominate the questioning once witnesses finally appear. The committee releases hours of Clinton deposition video while providing searchable written transcripts for numerous other Epstein-related witnesses, making independent examination of the Clinton testimony more difficult and leaving the public increasingly dependent on selectively edited clips and partisan summaries. Instead of methodically comparing testimony with flight records, photographs, calendars, communications, financial records, and other evidence, lawmakers repeatedly turn the investigation into another battle between Democrats and Republicans. That approach does little for survivors and even less to explain how Epstein maintained access to powerful people and institutions for so long. Bill and Hillary Clinton should not receive harsher treatment because of who they are, but neither should political allies shield them from the same level of scrutiny applied to other witnesses. Congress claims that nobody is above investigation, yet the Clinton depositions raise an uncomfortable question about whether lawmakers are willing to apply that principle when the witness belongs to their own political camp.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>707epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/house-panel-votes-41-0-to-hold-leon-black-in-contempt-9-17-26--75174561
Black has fought the subpoenas in federal court, arguing that they exceed the committee’s lawful authority and improperly seek private information unrelated to any legitimate legislative purpose. His lawyers also argued that producing the NDAs could expose women who had negotiated confidentiality and had no public connection to Epstein, while accusing Comer and ranking Democrat Robert Garcia of abusing congressional power. Black has denied wrongdoing, denied knowing about Epstein’s criminal conduct and said he regrets ever doing business with him. The committee, however, pointed to the roughly $170 million Black paid Epstein for tax and estate-planning services between 2013 and 2017 and to repeated appearances of Black’s name in Epstein-related records. More than a dozen Epstein survivors had also urged Black to comply, arguing that the NDAs could shed light on his relationship with Epstein and others in Epstein’s orbit.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

House panel recommends Leon Black be held in contempt over Epstein inquiry subpoenas | House of Representatives | The Guardian

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75174561Thu, 17 Sep 2026 12:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe House Oversight Committee voted unanimously, 41-0, to recommend that billionaire financier Leon Black be held in contempt of Congress for refusing to fully comply with subpoenas issued as part of its Jeffrey Epstein investigation. Chairman James...
Black has fought the subpoenas in federal court, arguing that they exceed the committee’s lawful authority and improperly seek private information unrelated to any legitimate legislative purpose. His lawyers also argued that producing the NDAs could expose women who had negotiated confidentiality and had no public connection to Epstein, while accusing Comer and ranking Democrat Robert Garcia of abusing congressional power. Black has denied wrongdoing, denied knowing about Epstein’s criminal conduct and said he regrets ever doing business with him. The committee, however, pointed to the roughly $170 million Black paid Epstein for tax and estate-planning services between 2013 and 2017 and to repeated appearances of Black’s name in Epstein-related records. More than a dozen Epstein survivors had also urged Black to comply, arguing that the NDAs could shed light on his relationship with Epstein and others in Epstein’s orbit.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

House panel recommends Leon Black be held in contempt over Epstein inquiry subpoenas | House of Representatives | The Guardian

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>791epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-was-was-moscow-pd-saying-in-december-of-2022-9-17-26--75171190In this episode, we take a close look at the official Moscow Police Department press releases issued from December 20 through December 28, 2022, during the final stretch before Bryan Kohberger’s arrest. The updates showed investigators continuing to publicly focus on the white Hyundai Elantra, processing thousands of tips, reviewing video evidence, conducting interviews and trying to separate credible information from the flood of rumors and speculation surrounding the murders of Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. Police repeatedly emphasized that no suspect had been publicly identified, no murder weapon had been recovered and investigators were still asking anyone with information about the Elantra or the victims’ movements to come forward.

Taken together, the releases captured a critical moment in the investigation when the public still had very little idea how far law enforcement had actually progressed behind the scenes. The statements were cautious and repetitive by design, offering few concrete details while investigators quietly built the case that would soon lead them to Kohberger in Pennsylvania. Looking back at those daily updates with the benefit of what later became public, they provide a useful timeline of what Moscow police were willing to say, what they deliberately withheld and how the investigation moved from an apparently open-ended manhunt toward the arrest that came just days later on December 30, 2022.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75171190Thu, 17 Sep 2026 10:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn this episode, we take a close look at the official Moscow Police Department press releases issued from December 20 through December 28, 2022, during the final stretch before Bryan Kohberger’s arrest. The updates showed investigators continuing to...In this episode, we take a close look at the official Moscow Police Department press releases issued from December 20 through December 28, 2022, during the final stretch before Bryan Kohberger’s arrest. The updates showed investigators continuing to publicly focus on the white Hyundai Elantra, processing thousands of tips, reviewing video evidence, conducting interviews and trying to separate credible information from the flood of rumors and speculation surrounding the murders of Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. Police repeatedly emphasized that no suspect had been publicly identified, no murder weapon had been recovered and investigators were still asking anyone with information about the Elantra or the victims’ movements to come forward.

Taken together, the releases captured a critical moment in the investigation when the public still had very little idea how far law enforcement had actually progressed behind the scenes. The statements were cautious and repetitive by design, offering few concrete details while investigators quietly built the case that would soon lead them to Kohberger in Pennsylvania. Looking back at those daily updates with the benefit of what later became public, they provide a useful timeline of what Moscow police were willing to say, what they deliberately withheld and how the investigation moved from an apparently open-ended manhunt toward the arrest that came just days later on December 30, 2022.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2688bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-state-of-idaho-and-the-strength-of-their-case-against-bryan-kohberger-9-17-26--75171189
What made the case particularly difficult for the defense was that the evidence did not depend on a single witness or one disputed forensic test. The State could combine the sheath DNA, vehicle movements, cellphone activity, surveillance footage, the crime-scene timeline and Kohberger’s own post-crime behavior into a single narrative. There were still weaknesses the defense intended to exploit: the murder weapon was never recovered, no clear motive or established relationship with the victims was publicly proven, cellphone tower data could not place him at an exact address, and defense attorneys challenged the investigative genetic genealogy process and other searches. They also highlighted unidentified male DNA found elsewhere at or near the house and the absence of publicly established victim DNA in Kohberger’s car. Even with those points, however, the prosecution possessed several independent categories of evidence that reinforced one another, which is why the case against Kohberger was widely regarded as formidable before he ultimately admitted in court that he had killed all four victims.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75171189Thu, 17 Sep 2026 08:30:03 +0000Bobby CapucciThe State of Idaho had built a powerful circumstantial and forensic case against Bryan Kohberger before his guilty plea removed the need for a trial. The centerpiece was the Ka-Bar knife sheath found beside Madison Mogen’s body, which contained a...
What made the case particularly difficult for the defense was that the evidence did not depend on a single witness or one disputed forensic test. The State could combine the sheath DNA, vehicle movements, cellphone activity, surveillance footage, the crime-scene timeline and Kohberger’s own post-crime behavior into a single narrative. There were still weaknesses the defense intended to exploit: the murder weapon was never recovered, no clear motive or established relationship with the victims was publicly proven, cellphone tower data could not place him at an exact address, and defense attorneys challenged the investigative genetic genealogy process and other searches. They also highlighted unidentified male DNA found elsewhere at or near the house and the absence of publicly established victim DNA in Kohberger’s car. Even with those points, however, the prosecution possessed several independent categories of evidence that reinforced one another, which is why the case against Kohberger was widely regarded as formidable before he ultimately admitted in court that he had killed all four victims.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2523bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-cary-stayner-and-the-yosemite-village-murders-9-17-26--75171197Cary Stayner was a motel handyman living and working near Yosemite National Park when he murdered four women in 1999, turning one of America’s most famous tourist destinations into the center of a serial-murder investigation. His first known victims were Carole Sund, her 15-year-old daughter Juli, and their 16-year-old family friend Silvina Pelosso, who disappeared while staying at the Cedar Lodge near Yosemite in February 1999. Their burned-out rental car was later found with two bodies inside, while Juli Sund’s body was discovered separately. Months later, Stayner killed 26-year-old Joie Armstrong, a Yosemite naturalist, near her cabin in the park. Investigators quickly focused on Stayner after Armstrong’s murder because he worked at the lodge where the earlier victims had stayed, and he ultimately confessed to all four killings, describing how he had abducted, restrained and murdered the women before attempting to conceal the crimes.


Cary Stayner was a motel handyman living and working near Yosemite National Park when he murdered four women in 1999, turning one of America’s most famous tourist destinations into the center of a serial-murder investigation. His first known victims were Carole Sund, her 15-year-old daughter Juli, and their 16-year-old family friend Silvina Pelosso, who disappeared while staying at the Cedar Lodge near Yosemite in February 1999. Their burned-out rental car was later found with two bodies inside, while Juli Sund’s body was discovered separately. Months later, Stayner killed 26-year-old Joie Armstrong, a Yosemite naturalist, near her cabin in the park. Investigators quickly focused on Stayner after Armstrong’s murder because he worked at the lodge where the earlier victims had stayed, and he ultimately confessed to all four killings, describing how he had abducted, restrained and murdered the women before attempting to conceal the crimes.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com










Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75171197Thu, 17 Sep 2026 06:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciCary Stayner was a motel handyman living and working near Yosemite National Park when he murdered four women in 1999, turning one of America’s most famous tourist destinations into the center of a serial-murder investigation. His first known victims...Cary Stayner was a motel handyman living and working near Yosemite National Park when he murdered four women in 1999, turning one of America’s most famous tourist destinations into the center of a serial-murder investigation. His first known victims were Carole Sund, her 15-year-old daughter Juli, and their 16-year-old family friend Silvina Pelosso, who disappeared while staying at the Cedar Lodge near Yosemite in February 1999. Their burned-out rental car was later found with two bodies inside, while Juli Sund’s body was discovered separately. Months later, Stayner killed 26-year-old Joie Armstrong, a Yosemite naturalist, near her cabin in the park. Investigators quickly focused on Stayner after Armstrong’s murder because he worked at the lodge where the earlier victims had stayed, and he ultimately confessed to all four killings, describing how he had abducted, restrained and murdered the women before attempting to conceal the crimes.


Cary Stayner was a motel handyman living and working near Yosemite National Park when he murdered four women in 1999, turning one of America’s most famous tourist destinations into the center of a serial-murder investigation. His first known victims were Carole Sund, her 15-year-old daughter Juli, and their 16-year-old family friend Silvina Pelosso, who disappeared while staying at the Cedar Lodge near Yosemite in February 1999. Their burned-out rental car was later found with two bodies inside, while Juli Sund’s body was discovered separately. Months later, Stayner killed 26-year-old Joie Armstrong, a Yosemite naturalist, near her cabin in the park. Investigators quickly focused on Stayner after Armstrong’s murder because he worked at the lodge where the earlier victims had stayed, and he ultimately confessed to all four killings, describing how he had abducted, restrained and murdered the women before attempting to conceal the crimes.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com










Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3564breakingnewsdaily,crime,murder,murderino,mystery,newsreports,podcast,podcastersofinstagram,serialkiller,serialkillers,ssdgm,truecrime,truecrimeaddict,truecrimecommunity,truecrimefan,truecrimejunkie,truecrimeobsessed,truecrimepodcast,unsolved,unsolvedmysteriestruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-murder-in-moscow-what-motivated-bryan-kohberger-to-murder-the-idaho-4--75171150
Another theory suggests the killings were more personal than academic. Reports indicate Kohberger may have followed the victims on social media and potentially visited the area multiple times before the murders. This raises the possibility of a growing obsession, perhaps unreciprocated or unnoticed by the victims, that spiraled into rage. The brutality of the crime—four people stabbed in their sleep—suggests a level of emotional intensity that points to more than detached curiosity. Whether it was resentment, rejection, a need for control, or some pathological fixation, the act appears deeply premeditated and full of personal symbolism. Yet with Kohberger offering no clear motive, and the public still left with unanswered questions, speculation continues to fill the vacuum where truth remains tightly sealed.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Why did Bryan Kohberger kill? Experts weigh in on mysterious killings




Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75171150Thu, 17 Sep 2026 04:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciSeveral theories have emerged to explain why Bryan Kohberger might have murdered the four University of Idaho students, but none have been conclusively proven. One of the most prevalent theories is that Kohberger, a criminal justice Ph.D. student, was...
Another theory suggests the killings were more personal than academic. Reports indicate Kohberger may have followed the victims on social media and potentially visited the area multiple times before the murders. This raises the possibility of a growing obsession, perhaps unreciprocated or unnoticed by the victims, that spiraled into rage. The brutality of the crime—four people stabbed in their sleep—suggests a level of emotional intensity that points to more than detached curiosity. Whether it was resentment, rejection, a need for control, or some pathological fixation, the act appears deeply premeditated and full of personal symbolism. Yet with Kohberger offering no clear motive, and the public still left with unanswered questions, speculation continues to fill the vacuum where truth remains tightly sealed.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Why did Bryan Kohberger kill? Experts weigh in on mysterious killings




Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>870bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-fox-news-digital-and-it-s-multipart-series-on-the-murders--75171149Former LAPD detective Mark Fuhrman said the mystery surrounding Bryan Kohberger’s motive remained one of the central unanswered questions in the Idaho murder case and became the focus of several Fox Nation programs examining his background, digital footprint and behavior. Fuhrman described the case as “ultimate evil meeting ultimate innocence” and said the goal was to better understand who Kohberger was and what, if anything, might have driven him to kill Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. At the time, prosecutors had accused Kohberger of entering the King Road house and murdering all four students, while investigators had tied him to the case through DNA found on the Ka-Bar knife sheath, the white Hyundai Elantra and other evidence. Fuhrman also emphasized that no established personal connection between Kohberger and the victims had been publicly identified, which made the question of motive even more difficult to explain.

The story also highlighted comments from former FBI investigator Bill Daly, who argued that Kohberger had made numerous mistakes that helped investigators build the case against him. Daly pointed to the vehicle, the sheath DNA, the surviving eyewitness and Kohberger’s cellphone activity, while also offering his own theory that Kohberger had stalked the victims and may have killed more people inside the house than he initially anticipated. Those claims reflected Daly’s interpretation of the evidence rather than findings that had been proven at trial at that point. Kohberger’s defense, meanwhile, continued challenging the prosecution on multiple fronts, including an unsuccessful effort to overturn the grand-jury indictment by arguing that jurors should have been required to find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt rather than probable cause. The article ultimately presented Kohberger as an unresolved psychological puzzle while framing the physical and digital evidence as the key to understanding how investigators believed the killings unfolded.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75171149Thu, 17 Sep 2026 02:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciFormer LAPD detective Mark Fuhrman said the mystery surrounding Bryan Kohberger’s motive remained one of the central unanswered questions in the Idaho murder case and became the focus of several Fox Nation programs examining his background, digital...Former LAPD detective Mark Fuhrman said the mystery surrounding Bryan Kohberger’s motive remained one of the central unanswered questions in the Idaho murder case and became the focus of several Fox Nation programs examining his background, digital footprint and behavior. Fuhrman described the case as “ultimate evil meeting ultimate innocence” and said the goal was to better understand who Kohberger was and what, if anything, might have driven him to kill Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. At the time, prosecutors had accused Kohberger of entering the King Road house and murdering all four students, while investigators had tied him to the case through DNA found on the Ka-Bar knife sheath, the white Hyundai Elantra and other evidence. Fuhrman also emphasized that no established personal connection between Kohberger and the victims had been publicly identified, which made the question of motive even more difficult to explain.

The story also highlighted comments from former FBI investigator Bill Daly, who argued that Kohberger had made numerous mistakes that helped investigators build the case against him. Daly pointed to the vehicle, the sheath DNA, the surviving eyewitness and Kohberger’s cellphone activity, while also offering his own theory that Kohberger had stalked the victims and may have killed more people inside the house than he initially anticipated. Those claims reflected Daly’s interpretation of the evidence rather than findings that had been proven at trial at that point. Kohberger’s defense, meanwhile, continued challenging the prosecution on multiple fronts, including an unsuccessful effort to overturn the grand-jury indictment by arguing that jurors should have been required to find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt rather than probable cause. The article ultimately presented Kohberger as an unresolved psychological puzzle while framing the physical and digital evidence as the key to understanding how investigators believed the killings unfolded.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>644bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcripts-day-1-part-19-9-16-26--75149340
The defense spent much of the first day attacking the manner in which the prosecution was getting its evidence into the record rather than attempting to disprove the entire prosecution theory at that stage. Kathryn Nester and Robinson’s attorneys repeatedly raised hearsay, foundation and authentication objections, arguing that investigators were being permitted to introduce reports, statements and records created by other people without those individuals appearing personally to testify. Judge Graf overruled most of those objections, reflecting the substantially lower evidentiary threshold governing a Utah preliminary hearing, whose purpose was only to determine whether probable cause existed to send Robinson to trial rather than whether prosecutors could prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. One significant exception involved an edited compilation of surveillance footage, which Graf declined to admit in that form and required prosecutors to replace with the underlying unedited material. Hull’s testimony also revealed the scope of the prosecution’s surveillance theory: investigators claimed Robinson had appeared on or around the UVU campus multiple times on September 10 and that they were attempting to stitch those appearances together into a continuous identification of the alleged shooter. By the end of day one, prosecutors had established the killing itself, the medical cause of Kirk’s death, the existence and authenticity of substantial video evidence and the beginnings of their effort to identify Robinson as the person captured in that footage. They had not yet presented many of the pieces expected to become more consequential later in the hearing, including the rifle and DNA evidence, Robinson’s alleged communications and admissions, and testimony concerning his roommate Lance Twiggs.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75149340Thu, 17 Sep 2026 00:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay one of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing on July 6, 2026, largely centered on prosecutors beginning to construct a timeline of Charlie Kirk’s killing at Utah Valley University and establishing the authenticity of the surveillance footage and...
The defense spent much of the first day attacking the manner in which the prosecution was getting its evidence into the record rather than attempting to disprove the entire prosecution theory at that stage. Kathryn Nester and Robinson’s attorneys repeatedly raised hearsay, foundation and authentication objections, arguing that investigators were being permitted to introduce reports, statements and records created by other people without those individuals appearing personally to testify. Judge Graf overruled most of those objections, reflecting the substantially lower evidentiary threshold governing a Utah preliminary hearing, whose purpose was only to determine whether probable cause existed to send Robinson to trial rather than whether prosecutors could prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. One significant exception involved an edited compilation of surveillance footage, which Graf declined to admit in that form and required prosecutors to replace with the underlying unedited material. Hull’s testimony also revealed the scope of the prosecution’s surveillance theory: investigators claimed Robinson had appeared on or around the UVU campus multiple times on September 10 and that they were attempting to stitch those appearances together into a continuous identification of the alleged shooter. By the end of day one, prosecutors had established the killing itself, the medical cause of Kirk’s death, the existence and authenticity of substantial video evidence and the beginnings of their effort to identify Robinson as the person captured in that footage. They had not yet presented many of the pieces expected to become more consequential later in the hearing, including the rifle and DNA evidence, Robinson’s alleged communications and admissions, and testimony concerning his roommate Lance Twiggs.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>968breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/hillary-clinton-and-the-transcript-from-her-epstein-related-talk-with-congress-part-7-9-16-26--75149341Hillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met Epstein, never flew on his plane, never visited Little St. James and knew nothing about his crimes before they became public. She described Maxwell as no more than a “casual acquaintance,” said she did not consider her a friend and attributed Maxwell’s presence around the Clinton family largely to her relationship with longtime Clinton friend Ted Waitt. Clinton acknowledged that Maxwell attended Chelsea Clinton’s 2010 wedding, but said she had no specific recollection of speaking with her there and believed Maxwell attended as Waitt’s guest. She also said she did not remember Maxwell visiting the Clintons’ Chappaqua home, despite Maxwell later saying she had been there several times, and said she had no knowledge of Epstein having connections to American or foreign intelligence services.

The questioning became much more contentious when lawmakers turned to Bill Clinton’s documented relationship with Epstein. Hillary characterized her husband’s relationship with Epstein as “limited” and primarily connected to his use of Epstein’s airplane, said she had no knowledge of Bill visiting Little St. James and maintained there was no evidence connecting him to Epstein’s crimes. When lawmakers pressed her about photographs showing Bill Clinton with Epstein, Maxwell and young women during trips, Clinton acknowledged seeing some of those photographs but said she had not become curious enough to investigate the circumstances herself, calling it simply “unfortunate” that her husband ever had dealings with Epstein. She also denied personally soliciting money from Epstein and said she was unaware of anyone doing so on her behalf, while acknowledging she knew little about whether Epstein played any role around Clinton Foundation or Clinton Global Initiative activities. The transcript therefore presented a consistent Clinton defense: she said she personally had essentially no relationship with Epstein and only a peripheral relationship with Maxwell, while repeatedly separating herself from questions about Bill Clinton by telling lawmakers that he would have to answer for his own conduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75149341Wed, 16 Sep 2026 22:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciHillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met...Hillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met Epstein, never flew on his plane, never visited Little St. James and knew nothing about his crimes before they became public. She described Maxwell as no more than a “casual acquaintance,” said she did not consider her a friend and attributed Maxwell’s presence around the Clinton family largely to her relationship with longtime Clinton friend Ted Waitt. Clinton acknowledged that Maxwell attended Chelsea Clinton’s 2010 wedding, but said she had no specific recollection of speaking with her there and believed Maxwell attended as Waitt’s guest. She also said she did not remember Maxwell visiting the Clintons’ Chappaqua home, despite Maxwell later saying she had been there several times, and said she had no knowledge of Epstein having connections to American or foreign intelligence services.

The questioning became much more contentious when lawmakers turned to Bill Clinton’s documented relationship with Epstein. Hillary characterized her husband’s relationship with Epstein as “limited” and primarily connected to his use of Epstein’s airplane, said she had no knowledge of Bill visiting Little St. James and maintained there was no evidence connecting him to Epstein’s crimes. When lawmakers pressed her about photographs showing Bill Clinton with Epstein, Maxwell and young women during trips, Clinton acknowledged seeing some of those photographs but said she had not become curious enough to investigate the circumstances herself, calling it simply “unfortunate” that her husband ever had dealings with Epstein. She also denied personally soliciting money from Epstein and said she was unaware of anyone doing so on her behalf, while acknowledging she knew little about whether Epstein played any role around Clinton Foundation or Clinton Global Initiative activities. The transcript therefore presented a consistent Clinton defense: she said she personally had essentially no relationship with Epstein and only a peripheral relationship with Maxwell, while repeatedly separating herself from questions about Bill Clinton by telling lawmakers that he would have to answer for his own conduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>685epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/hillary-clinton-and-the-transcript-from-her-epstein-related-talk-with-congress-part-6-9-16-26--75149343Hillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met Epstein, never flew on his plane, never visited Little St. James and knew nothing about his crimes before they became public. She described Maxwell as no more than a “casual acquaintance,” said she did not consider her a friend and attributed Maxwell’s presence around the Clinton family largely to her relationship with longtime Clinton friend Ted Waitt. Clinton acknowledged that Maxwell attended Chelsea Clinton’s 2010 wedding, but said she had no specific recollection of speaking with her there and believed Maxwell attended as Waitt’s guest. She also said she did not remember Maxwell visiting the Clintons’ Chappaqua home, despite Maxwell later saying she had been there several times, and said she had no knowledge of Epstein having connections to American or foreign intelligence services.

The questioning became much more contentious when lawmakers turned to Bill Clinton’s documented relationship with Epstein. Hillary characterized her husband’s relationship with Epstein as “limited” and primarily connected to his use of Epstein’s airplane, said she had no knowledge of Bill visiting Little St. James and maintained there was no evidence connecting him to Epstein’s crimes. When lawmakers pressed her about photographs showing Bill Clinton with Epstein, Maxwell and young women during trips, Clinton acknowledged seeing some of those photographs but said she had not become curious enough to investigate the circumstances herself, calling it simply “unfortunate” that her husband ever had dealings with Epstein. She also denied personally soliciting money from Epstein and said she was unaware of anyone doing so on her behalf, while acknowledging she knew little about whether Epstein played any role around Clinton Foundation or Clinton Global Initiative activities. The transcript therefore presented a consistent Clinton defense: she said she personally had essentially no relationship with Epstein and only a peripheral relationship with Maxwell, while repeatedly separating herself from questions about Bill Clinton by telling lawmakers that he would have to answer for his own conduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75149343Wed, 16 Sep 2026 20:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciHillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met...Hillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met Epstein, never flew on his plane, never visited Little St. James and knew nothing about his crimes before they became public. She described Maxwell as no more than a “casual acquaintance,” said she did not consider her a friend and attributed Maxwell’s presence around the Clinton family largely to her relationship with longtime Clinton friend Ted Waitt. Clinton acknowledged that Maxwell attended Chelsea Clinton’s 2010 wedding, but said she had no specific recollection of speaking with her there and believed Maxwell attended as Waitt’s guest. She also said she did not remember Maxwell visiting the Clintons’ Chappaqua home, despite Maxwell later saying she had been there several times, and said she had no knowledge of Epstein having connections to American or foreign intelligence services.

The questioning became much more contentious when lawmakers turned to Bill Clinton’s documented relationship with Epstein. Hillary characterized her husband’s relationship with Epstein as “limited” and primarily connected to his use of Epstein’s airplane, said she had no knowledge of Bill visiting Little St. James and maintained there was no evidence connecting him to Epstein’s crimes. When lawmakers pressed her about photographs showing Bill Clinton with Epstein, Maxwell and young women during trips, Clinton acknowledged seeing some of those photographs but said she had not become curious enough to investigate the circumstances herself, calling it simply “unfortunate” that her husband ever had dealings with Epstein. She also denied personally soliciting money from Epstein and said she was unaware of anyone doing so on her behalf, while acknowledging she knew little about whether Epstein played any role around Clinton Foundation or Clinton Global Initiative activities. The transcript therefore presented a consistent Clinton defense: she said she personally had essentially no relationship with Epstein and only a peripheral relationship with Maxwell, while repeatedly separating herself from questions about Bill Clinton by telling lawmakers that he would have to answer for his own conduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>763epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-idaho-officials-blast-planned-release-of-victims-unredacted-images-9-16-26--75171069
The threatened release also reopened longstanding anger from the victims’ families over crime-scene imagery appearing online. Some redacted photographs had already been released through public-records requests in 2025, reportedly without the families being warned beforehand, and the controversy helped spur a new Idaho law exempting photographs of deceased victims from public disclosure. Ethan Chapin’s mother, Stacy Chapin, publicly pleaded for people to stop circulating the images, saying they had nothing to do with transparency and only inflicted more pain. Criminal-justice professor Danielle Slakoff said the episode illustrated the darker side of online true crime, where sensational material and unsupported speculation can generate clicks while retraumatizing families and shifting attention toward the killer rather than the victims.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

North Idaho investigators 'deeply troubled' as content creators prepare to release unredacted photos of Moscow crime scene

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75171069Wed, 16 Sep 2026 18:30:05 +0000Bobby CapucciNorth Idaho investigators said they were “deeply troubled” after true-crime content creators claimed they had obtained unredacted crime-scene photographs showing the bodies and wounds of Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin...
The threatened release also reopened longstanding anger from the victims’ families over crime-scene imagery appearing online. Some redacted photographs had already been released through public-records requests in 2025, reportedly without the families being warned beforehand, and the controversy helped spur a new Idaho law exempting photographs of deceased victims from public disclosure. Ethan Chapin’s mother, Stacy Chapin, publicly pleaded for people to stop circulating the images, saying they had nothing to do with transparency and only inflicted more pain. Criminal-justice professor Danielle Slakoff said the episode illustrated the darker side of online true crime, where sensational material and unsupported speculation can generate clicks while retraumatizing families and shifting attention toward the killer rather than the victims.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

North Idaho investigators 'deeply troubled' as content creators prepare to release unredacted photos of Moscow crime scene

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>935bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/epstein-and-the-blurred-line-between-government-and-influence-part-2-9-16-26--75149339
Those questions have become more urgent following the removal of journalist Tara Palmeri and three Epstein survivors from a Republican political convention after Palmeri questioned a congressional candidate about the Epstein files. The episode was followed by another familiar wave of social-media attacks and pro-administration messaging, adding to a recurring pattern in which Epstein controversies are quickly met by large political accounts defending the government, attacking critics, or diminishing survivors. None of that, by itself, proves a coordinated propaganda network, but the Patel messages and the DataRepublican revelation provide enough documented evidence to justify a deeper investigation into who these influencers work for, who pays them, whether they communicate with federal officials, and whether taxpayer-funded government personnel are helping shape supposedly independent political messaging surrounding Epstein.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75149339Wed, 16 Sep 2026 16:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciRecent disclosures have raised new questions about how the federal government and politically aligned online influencers respond to damaging developments involving Jeffrey Epstein. Released messages show FBI Director Kash Patel pressing bureau...
Those questions have become more urgent following the removal of journalist Tara Palmeri and three Epstein survivors from a Republican political convention after Palmeri questioned a congressional candidate about the Epstein files. The episode was followed by another familiar wave of social-media attacks and pro-administration messaging, adding to a recurring pattern in which Epstein controversies are quickly met by large political accounts defending the government, attacking critics, or diminishing survivors. None of that, by itself, proves a coordinated propaganda network, but the Patel messages and the DataRepublican revelation provide enough documented evidence to justify a deeper investigation into who these influencers work for, who pays them, whether they communicate with federal officials, and whether taxpayer-funded government personnel are helping shape supposedly independent political messaging surrounding Epstein.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>861epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/epstein-and-the-blurred-line-between-government-and-influence-part-1-9-16-26--75149338
Those questions have become more urgent following the removal of journalist Tara Palmeri and three Epstein survivors from a Republican political convention after Palmeri questioned a congressional candidate about the Epstein files. The episode was followed by another familiar wave of social-media attacks and pro-administration messaging, adding to a recurring pattern in which Epstein controversies are quickly met by large political accounts defending the government, attacking critics, or diminishing survivors. None of that, by itself, proves a coordinated propaganda network, but the Patel messages and the DataRepublican revelation provide enough documented evidence to justify a deeper investigation into who these influencers work for, who pays them, whether they communicate with federal officials, and whether taxpayer-funded government personnel are helping shape supposedly independent political messaging surrounding Epstein.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75149338Wed, 16 Sep 2026 14:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciRecent disclosures have raised new questions about how the federal government and politically aligned online influencers respond to damaging developments involving Jeffrey Epstein. Released messages show FBI Director Kash Patel pressing bureau...
Those questions have become more urgent following the removal of journalist Tara Palmeri and three Epstein survivors from a Republican political convention after Palmeri questioned a congressional candidate about the Epstein files. The episode was followed by another familiar wave of social-media attacks and pro-administration messaging, adding to a recurring pattern in which Epstein controversies are quickly met by large political accounts defending the government, attacking critics, or diminishing survivors. None of that, by itself, proves a coordinated propaganda network, but the Patel messages and the DataRepublican revelation provide enough documented evidence to justify a deeper investigation into who these influencers work for, who pays them, whether they communicate with federal officials, and whether taxpayer-funded government personnel are helping shape supposedly independent political messaging surrounding Epstein.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>663epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/jeffrey-epstein-s-fellow-inmate-says-he-believes-epstein-killed-himself-9-16-26--75149344
Mersey also said another inmate housed nearby told him he heard Epstein tearing up sheets during the night and believed Epstein had killed himself, not been attacked. Mersey argued that a murder conspiracy inside the jail would have required too many people to coordinate and remain silent, and said he was nearly certain the official suicide finding was correct. His account is significant because he was one of the relatively few inmates who had sustained direct contact with Epstein in the weeks before his death, but it does not erase the extraordinary failures documented at MCC. Guards failed to perform required checks for hours, Epstein was left without a cellmate, records were falsified, and surveillance problems continued to fuel suspicion about what happened. Mersey’s testimony therefore adds firsthand support for the suicide explanation while sitting alongside the institutional failures and unresolved questions that have kept Epstein’s death controversial years later.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


Jeffrey Epstein's suicide watch 'companion' insists paedophile financier DID kill himself after becoming 'defeated' in his final days | Daily Mail Online

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75149344Wed, 16 Sep 2026 12:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciA former inmate who spent hours with Jeffrey Epstein while Epstein was under suicide watch at Manhattan’s Metropolitan Correctional Center said he believed Epstein killed himself and rejected the idea that he was murdered. William “Dollar Bill” Mersey...
Mersey also said another inmate housed nearby told him he heard Epstein tearing up sheets during the night and believed Epstein had killed himself, not been attacked. Mersey argued that a murder conspiracy inside the jail would have required too many people to coordinate and remain silent, and said he was nearly certain the official suicide finding was correct. His account is significant because he was one of the relatively few inmates who had sustained direct contact with Epstein in the weeks before his death, but it does not erase the extraordinary failures documented at MCC. Guards failed to perform required checks for hours, Epstein was left without a cellmate, records were falsified, and surveillance problems continued to fuel suspicion about what happened. Mersey’s testimony therefore adds firsthand support for the suicide explanation while sitting alongside the institutional failures and unresolved questions that have kept Epstein’s death controversial years later.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


Jeffrey Epstein's suicide watch 'companion' insists paedophile financier DID kill himself after becoming 'defeated' in his final days | Daily Mail Online

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>685epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-kohberger-trial-finds-a-new-home-and-a-new-judge-is-seated-9-16-26--75147462
The Idaho Supreme Court then assigned Fourth Judicial District Judge Steven Hippler to replace Judge Judge and preside over the case. Hippler immediately inherited the enormous docket, including the death-penalty litigation, discovery disputes, evidentiary motions and the existing trial schedule. Kohberger made his first Boise courtroom appearance before Hippler on September 26, 2024, when the new judge made clear that he expected professionalism from both sides and began reassessing the timetable for the capital trial. The move therefore represented much more than simply changing courthouses: the case shifted more than 300 miles from the community where the murders occurred to Idaho’s largest metropolitan area, while a completely new judge assumed control of one of the most heavily scrutinized criminal prosecutions in the country.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75147462Wed, 16 Sep 2026 10:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBryan Kohberger’s murder trial was moved out of Latah County in September 2024 after his defense argued that the extraordinary publicity surrounding the killings of Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin made it impossible to...
The Idaho Supreme Court then assigned Fourth Judicial District Judge Steven Hippler to replace Judge Judge and preside over the case. Hippler immediately inherited the enormous docket, including the death-penalty litigation, discovery disputes, evidentiary motions and the existing trial schedule. Kohberger made his first Boise courtroom appearance before Hippler on September 26, 2024, when the new judge made clear that he expected professionalism from both sides and began reassessing the timetable for the capital trial. The move therefore represented much more than simply changing courthouses: the case shifted more than 300 miles from the community where the murders occurred to Idaho’s largest metropolitan area, while a completely new judge assumed control of one of the most heavily scrutinized criminal prosecutions in the country.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2624bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-the-brady-violation-argument-9-16-26--75147463The discovery fight between Bryan Kohberger’s defense and the State of Idaho became one of the longest-running battles in the case, beginning almost immediately after his attorneys entered the case and continuing through repeated supplemental discovery requests, motions to compel and disputes over DNA, investigative genetic genealogy, digital evidence, police records, tips, search-warrant material and expert disclosures. Kohberger’s lawyers argued that prosecutors were not simply dealing with a large case but were producing an enormous volume of material in a way that made meaningful review extraordinarily difficult. By 2025, the defense said it had received more than 68 terabytes of discovery, including tens of thousands of photographs and videos, data from more than 60 electronic devices and extensive search-warrant returns. They compared the production to dumping evidence into a “snow globe,” arguing that potentially important material was scattered throughout vast datasets without adequate organization or identification. Prosecutors pushed back that they had complied with Idaho Criminal Rule 16, responded to more than 20 supplemental requests, produced hundreds of pages of indexes identifying requested evidence and continued supplementing discovery as additional material became available.

Kohberger’s attorneys eventually escalated the dispute by alleging that the manner and timing of the State’s disclosures implicated Brady v. Maryland and Giglio v. United States, which require prosecutors to disclose favorable evidence, including exculpatory information and material that can be used to impeach government witnesses. The defense argued that the State could not satisfy those obligations merely by burying favorable evidence somewhere inside tens of terabytes of material, particularly when some records were allegedly produced late or only after repeated requests. In litigation over investigative genetic genealogy, the defense went further and accused the State of withholding or concealing evidence it had specifically requested, contending that prosecutors acknowledged possessing certain material long before it was disclosed. Kohberger sought severe remedies, including exclusion of evidence and even removal of the death penalty. The State denied any Brady or Giglio violation, arguing that it had turned over the evidence in its possession and was not legally required to point the defense to every potentially favorable document within the larger production. Judge Steven Hippler ultimately rejected the broader Brady theory, finding that Kohberger had not identified specific favorable evidence that the State had actually suppressed and therefore had not established the elements of a constitutional Brady violation.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75147463Wed, 16 Sep 2026 08:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe discovery fight between Bryan Kohberger’s defense and the State of Idaho became one of the longest-running battles in the case, beginning almost immediately after his attorneys entered the case and continuing through repeated supplemental...The discovery fight between Bryan Kohberger’s defense and the State of Idaho became one of the longest-running battles in the case, beginning almost immediately after his attorneys entered the case and continuing through repeated supplemental discovery requests, motions to compel and disputes over DNA, investigative genetic genealogy, digital evidence, police records, tips, search-warrant material and expert disclosures. Kohberger’s lawyers argued that prosecutors were not simply dealing with a large case but were producing an enormous volume of material in a way that made meaningful review extraordinarily difficult. By 2025, the defense said it had received more than 68 terabytes of discovery, including tens of thousands of photographs and videos, data from more than 60 electronic devices and extensive search-warrant returns. They compared the production to dumping evidence into a “snow globe,” arguing that potentially important material was scattered throughout vast datasets without adequate organization or identification. Prosecutors pushed back that they had complied with Idaho Criminal Rule 16, responded to more than 20 supplemental requests, produced hundreds of pages of indexes identifying requested evidence and continued supplementing discovery as additional material became available.

Kohberger’s attorneys eventually escalated the dispute by alleging that the manner and timing of the State’s disclosures implicated Brady v. Maryland and Giglio v. United States, which require prosecutors to disclose favorable evidence, including exculpatory information and material that can be used to impeach government witnesses. The defense argued that the State could not satisfy those obligations merely by burying favorable evidence somewhere inside tens of terabytes of material, particularly when some records were allegedly produced late or only after repeated requests. In litigation over investigative genetic genealogy, the defense went further and accused the State of withholding or concealing evidence it had specifically requested, contending that prosecutors acknowledged possessing certain material long before it was disclosed. Kohberger sought severe remedies, including exclusion of evidence and even removal of the death penalty. The State denied any Brady or Giglio violation, arguing that it had turned over the evidence in its possession and was not legally required to point the defense to every potentially favorable document within the larger production. Judge Steven Hippler ultimately rejected the broader Brady theory, finding that Kohberger had not identified specific favorable evidence that the State had actually suppressed and therefore had not established the elements of a constitutional Brady violation.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2613bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-alex-cox-and-his-role-in-the-murder-of-tylee-and-jj-9-15-26--75147461Alex Cox was Lori Vallow Daybell’s older brother and one of the central figures surrounding the deaths of her children, Tylee Ryan and JJ Vallow. Cox had already drawn scrutiny before the children disappeared because he shot and killed Lori’s estranged husband, Charles Vallow, in July 2019, claiming self-defense. Prosecutors later portrayed Cox as fiercely loyal to Lori and deeply influenced by the apocalyptic religious beliefs she shared with Chad Daybell. Witnesses testified that Lori and Chad convinced Cox that he had a divine mission to protect Lori, and Zulema Pastenes, whom Cox married shortly before his death, said he eventually worried that Lori and Chad were setting him up as the “fall guy.” Cox died of what authorities ruled natural causes in December 2019, before he could be charged or questioned further about the children’s deaths.


Suspicion surrounding Cox’s role in Tylee and JJ’s murders was driven largely by cellphone data and the timeline of the children’s final known movements. Tylee was last verifiably seen on September 8, 2019, during a trip to Yellowstone with Lori, JJ and Cox; the next morning, Cox’s phone placed him for hours on Chad Daybell’s property near the area where Tylee’s remains were later found. JJ was last seen alive on September 22, when witness David Warwick said Cox carried the sleeping boy into Lori’s apartment; the next morning, Cox’s phone again placed him at Daybell’s property, and investigators later alleged that Cox transported JJ’s body there. JJ was found wrapped in plastic and duct tape, while Tylee’s remains had been burned and dismembered. Cox was never tried, so his precise role was never adjudicated in court, but prosecutors in Lori and Chad’s cases treated him as a key participant in the conspiracy and disposal of both children.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75147461Wed, 16 Sep 2026 06:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciAlex Cox was Lori Vallow Daybell’s older brother and one of the central figures surrounding the deaths of her children, Tylee Ryan and JJ Vallow. Cox had already drawn scrutiny before the children disappeared because he shot and killed Lori’s...Alex Cox was Lori Vallow Daybell’s older brother and one of the central figures surrounding the deaths of her children, Tylee Ryan and JJ Vallow. Cox had already drawn scrutiny before the children disappeared because he shot and killed Lori’s estranged husband, Charles Vallow, in July 2019, claiming self-defense. Prosecutors later portrayed Cox as fiercely loyal to Lori and deeply influenced by the apocalyptic religious beliefs she shared with Chad Daybell. Witnesses testified that Lori and Chad convinced Cox that he had a divine mission to protect Lori, and Zulema Pastenes, whom Cox married shortly before his death, said he eventually worried that Lori and Chad were setting him up as the “fall guy.” Cox died of what authorities ruled natural causes in December 2019, before he could be charged or questioned further about the children’s deaths.


Suspicion surrounding Cox’s role in Tylee and JJ’s murders was driven largely by cellphone data and the timeline of the children’s final known movements. Tylee was last verifiably seen on September 8, 2019, during a trip to Yellowstone with Lori, JJ and Cox; the next morning, Cox’s phone placed him for hours on Chad Daybell’s property near the area where Tylee’s remains were later found. JJ was last seen alive on September 22, when witness David Warwick said Cox carried the sleeping boy into Lori’s apartment; the next morning, Cox’s phone again placed him at Daybell’s property, and investigators later alleged that Cox transported JJ’s body there. JJ was found wrapped in plastic and duct tape, while Tylee’s remains had been burned and dismembered. Cox was never tried, so his precise role was never adjudicated in court, but prosecutors in Lori and Chad’s cases treated him as a key participant in the conspiracy and disposal of both children.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2618chaddaybell,charlesvallow,daybellcase,daybellcult,daybelltrial,doomsdaymom,idahosupremecourt,idahotruecrime,jjvallow,justicefortyleeandjj,loridaybell,loridaybelltrial,lorivallow,lorivallowappeal,lorivallowdaybell,lorivallowtrial,tammydaybell,truecrime,truecrimecommunity,tyleeryantruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-bryan-kohberger-attempts-to-get-dna-evidence-tossed--75147798
The possibility of getting the DNA evidence thrown out depended on whether Kohberger’s lawyers could show that investigators had obtained or used it unlawfully rather than simply demonstrating that the IGG process had helped point police toward him. Even if the defense successfully challenged portions of the genealogy investigation, prosecutors had a separate and much stronger evidentiary step: after Kohberger’s arrest, investigators obtained a direct DNA sample from him and reported that it matched the male DNA recovered from the sheath. That meant the defense faced a difficult task in trying to suppress the final DNA comparison, because prosecutors could argue that the direct match was supported independently of the genealogy work. The fight therefore became about far more than the statistical strength of the sheath DNA; it was about whether the investigative path that led police to Kohberger had been conducted lawfully and whether any violation was serious enough to keep one of the prosecution’s most important pieces of evidence away from a jury.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75147798Wed, 16 Sep 2026 04:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe dispute centered on Bryan Kohberger’s defense effort to obtain and potentially suppress DNA evidence connected to the knife sheath found beside Madison Mogen’s body. Kohberger’s attorneys had repeatedly demanded the underlying genetic material and...
The possibility of getting the DNA evidence thrown out depended on whether Kohberger’s lawyers could show that investigators had obtained or used it unlawfully rather than simply demonstrating that the IGG process had helped point police toward him. Even if the defense successfully challenged portions of the genealogy investigation, prosecutors had a separate and much stronger evidentiary step: after Kohberger’s arrest, investigators obtained a direct DNA sample from him and reported that it matched the male DNA recovered from the sheath. That meant the defense faced a difficult task in trying to suppress the final DNA comparison, because prosecutors could argue that the direct match was supported independently of the genealogy work. The fight therefore became about far more than the statistical strength of the sheath DNA; it was about whether the investigative path that led police to Kohberger had been conducted lawfully and whether any violation was serious enough to keep one of the prosecution’s most important pieces of evidence away from a jury.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>658bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-the-state-of-idaho-and-the-admission-of-the-9-11-call-into-evidence--75147776
The 911 call was placed after one of the victims, Xana Kernodle, was found unresponsive. The prosecution maintains that presenting this call in court will help construct an accurate timeline of the events following the discovery of the victims and shed light on the immediate actions taken by the surviving roommates and other witnesses. They assert that the call's content is relevant and admissible, as it provides context to the initial law enforcement response and the unfolding of the investigation.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

022425-REDACTED-Motion-inLimine-RE-911-Call.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75147776Wed, 16 Sep 2026 02:30:02 +0000Bobby Capucci​In the case against Bryan Kohberger, charged with the November 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students, the prosecution has filed a motion in limine regarding the admissibility of the 911 call made on the morning of the incident. The state...
The 911 call was placed after one of the victims, Xana Kernodle, was found unresponsive. The prosecution maintains that presenting this call in court will help construct an accurate timeline of the events following the discovery of the victims and shed light on the immediate actions taken by the surviving roommates and other witnesses. They assert that the call's content is relevant and admissible, as it provides context to the initial law enforcement response and the unfolding of the investigation.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

022425-REDACTED-Motion-inLimine-RE-911-Call.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>691bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcripts-day-1-part-19-9-15-26--75147201
The defense spent much of the first day attacking the manner in which the prosecution was getting its evidence into the record rather than attempting to disprove the entire prosecution theory at that stage. Kathryn Nester and Robinson’s attorneys repeatedly raised hearsay, foundation and authentication objections, arguing that investigators were being permitted to introduce reports, statements and records created by other people without those individuals appearing personally to testify. Judge Graf overruled most of those objections, reflecting the substantially lower evidentiary threshold governing a Utah preliminary hearing, whose purpose was only to determine whether probable cause existed to send Robinson to trial rather than whether prosecutors could prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. One significant exception involved an edited compilation of surveillance footage, which Graf declined to admit in that form and required prosecutors to replace with the underlying unedited material. Hull’s testimony also revealed the scope of the prosecution’s surveillance theory: investigators claimed Robinson had appeared on or around the UVU campus multiple times on September 10 and that they were attempting to stitch those appearances together into a continuous identification of the alleged shooter. By the end of day one, prosecutors had established the killing itself, the medical cause of Kirk’s death, the existence and authenticity of substantial video evidence and the beginnings of their effort to identify Robinson as the person captured in that footage. They had not yet presented many of the pieces expected to become more consequential later in the hearing, including the rifle and DNA evidence, Robinson’s alleged communications and admissions, and testimony concerning his roommate Lance Twiggs.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75147201Wed, 16 Sep 2026 00:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay one of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing on July 6, 2026, largely centered on prosecutors beginning to construct a timeline of Charlie Kirk’s killing at Utah Valley University and establishing the authenticity of the surveillance footage and...
The defense spent much of the first day attacking the manner in which the prosecution was getting its evidence into the record rather than attempting to disprove the entire prosecution theory at that stage. Kathryn Nester and Robinson’s attorneys repeatedly raised hearsay, foundation and authentication objections, arguing that investigators were being permitted to introduce reports, statements and records created by other people without those individuals appearing personally to testify. Judge Graf overruled most of those objections, reflecting the substantially lower evidentiary threshold governing a Utah preliminary hearing, whose purpose was only to determine whether probable cause existed to send Robinson to trial rather than whether prosecutors could prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. One significant exception involved an edited compilation of surveillance footage, which Graf declined to admit in that form and required prosecutors to replace with the underlying unedited material. Hull’s testimony also revealed the scope of the prosecution’s surveillance theory: investigators claimed Robinson had appeared on or around the UVU campus multiple times on September 10 and that they were attempting to stitch those appearances together into a continuous identification of the alleged shooter. By the end of day one, prosecutors had established the killing itself, the medical cause of Kirk’s death, the existence and authenticity of substantial video evidence and the beginnings of their effort to identify Robinson as the person captured in that footage. They had not yet presented many of the pieces expected to become more consequential later in the hearing, including the rifle and DNA evidence, Robinson’s alleged communications and admissions, and testimony concerning his roommate Lance Twiggs.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>968breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcripts-day-1-part-18-9-15-26--75127617
The defense spent much of the first day attacking the manner in which the prosecution was getting its evidence into the record rather than attempting to disprove the entire prosecution theory at that stage. Kathryn Nester and Robinson’s attorneys repeatedly raised hearsay, foundation and authentication objections, arguing that investigators were being permitted to introduce reports, statements and records created by other people without those individuals appearing personally to testify. Judge Graf overruled most of those objections, reflecting the substantially lower evidentiary threshold governing a Utah preliminary hearing, whose purpose was only to determine whether probable cause existed to send Robinson to trial rather than whether prosecutors could prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. One significant exception involved an edited compilation of surveillance footage, which Graf declined to admit in that form and required prosecutors to replace with the underlying unedited material. Hull’s testimony also revealed the scope of the prosecution’s surveillance theory: investigators claimed Robinson had appeared on or around the UVU campus multiple times on September 10 and that they were attempting to stitch those appearances together into a continuous identification of the alleged shooter. By the end of day one, prosecutors had established the killing itself, the medical cause of Kirk’s death, the existence and authenticity of substantial video evidence and the beginnings of their effort to identify Robinson as the person captured in that footage. They had not yet presented many of the pieces expected to become more consequential later in the hearing, including the rifle and DNA evidence, Robinson’s alleged communications and admissions, and testimony concerning his roommate Lance Twiggs.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75127617Tue, 15 Sep 2026 22:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay one of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing on July 6, 2026, largely centered on prosecutors beginning to construct a timeline of Charlie Kirk’s killing at Utah Valley University and establishing the authenticity of the surveillance footage and...
The defense spent much of the first day attacking the manner in which the prosecution was getting its evidence into the record rather than attempting to disprove the entire prosecution theory at that stage. Kathryn Nester and Robinson’s attorneys repeatedly raised hearsay, foundation and authentication objections, arguing that investigators were being permitted to introduce reports, statements and records created by other people without those individuals appearing personally to testify. Judge Graf overruled most of those objections, reflecting the substantially lower evidentiary threshold governing a Utah preliminary hearing, whose purpose was only to determine whether probable cause existed to send Robinson to trial rather than whether prosecutors could prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. One significant exception involved an edited compilation of surveillance footage, which Graf declined to admit in that form and required prosecutors to replace with the underlying unedited material. Hull’s testimony also revealed the scope of the prosecution’s surveillance theory: investigators claimed Robinson had appeared on or around the UVU campus multiple times on September 10 and that they were attempting to stitch those appearances together into a continuous identification of the alleged shooter. By the end of day one, prosecutors had established the killing itself, the medical cause of Kirk’s death, the existence and authenticity of substantial video evidence and the beginnings of their effort to identify Robinson as the person captured in that footage. They had not yet presented many of the pieces expected to become more consequential later in the hearing, including the rifle and DNA evidence, Robinson’s alleged communications and admissions, and testimony concerning his roommate Lance Twiggs.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>836epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/hillary-clinton-and-the-transcript-from-her-epstein-related-talk-with-congress-part-4-9-15-26--75127612Hillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met Epstein, never flew on his plane, never visited Little St. James and knew nothing about his crimes before they became public. She described Maxwell as no more than a “casual acquaintance,” said she did not consider her a friend and attributed Maxwell’s presence around the Clinton family largely to her relationship with longtime Clinton friend Ted Waitt. Clinton acknowledged that Maxwell attended Chelsea Clinton’s 2010 wedding, but said she had no specific recollection of speaking with her there and believed Maxwell attended as Waitt’s guest. She also said she did not remember Maxwell visiting the Clintons’ Chappaqua home, despite Maxwell later saying she had been there several times, and said she had no knowledge of Epstein having connections to American or foreign intelligence services.

The questioning became much more contentious when lawmakers turned to Bill Clinton’s documented relationship with Epstein. Hillary characterized her husband’s relationship with Epstein as “limited” and primarily connected to his use of Epstein’s airplane, said she had no knowledge of Bill visiting Little St. James and maintained there was no evidence connecting him to Epstein’s crimes. When lawmakers pressed her about photographs showing Bill Clinton with Epstein, Maxwell and young women during trips, Clinton acknowledged seeing some of those photographs but said she had not become curious enough to investigate the circumstances herself, calling it simply “unfortunate” that her husband ever had dealings with Epstein. She also denied personally soliciting money from Epstein and said she was unaware of anyone doing so on her behalf, while acknowledging she knew little about whether Epstein played any role around Clinton Foundation or Clinton Global Initiative activities. The transcript therefore presented a consistent Clinton defense: she said she personally had essentially no relationship with Epstein and only a peripheral relationship with Maxwell, while repeatedly separating herself from questions about Bill Clinton by telling lawmakers that he would have to answer for his own conduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75127612Tue, 15 Sep 2026 20:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciHillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met...Hillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met Epstein, never flew on his plane, never visited Little St. James and knew nothing about his crimes before they became public. She described Maxwell as no more than a “casual acquaintance,” said she did not consider her a friend and attributed Maxwell’s presence around the Clinton family largely to her relationship with longtime Clinton friend Ted Waitt. Clinton acknowledged that Maxwell attended Chelsea Clinton’s 2010 wedding, but said she had no specific recollection of speaking with her there and believed Maxwell attended as Waitt’s guest. She also said she did not remember Maxwell visiting the Clintons’ Chappaqua home, despite Maxwell later saying she had been there several times, and said she had no knowledge of Epstein having connections to American or foreign intelligence services.

The questioning became much more contentious when lawmakers turned to Bill Clinton’s documented relationship with Epstein. Hillary characterized her husband’s relationship with Epstein as “limited” and primarily connected to his use of Epstein’s airplane, said she had no knowledge of Bill visiting Little St. James and maintained there was no evidence connecting him to Epstein’s crimes. When lawmakers pressed her about photographs showing Bill Clinton with Epstein, Maxwell and young women during trips, Clinton acknowledged seeing some of those photographs but said she had not become curious enough to investigate the circumstances herself, calling it simply “unfortunate” that her husband ever had dealings with Epstein. She also denied personally soliciting money from Epstein and said she was unaware of anyone doing so on her behalf, while acknowledging she knew little about whether Epstein played any role around Clinton Foundation or Clinton Global Initiative activities. The transcript therefore presented a consistent Clinton defense: she said she personally had essentially no relationship with Epstein and only a peripheral relationship with Maxwell, while repeatedly separating herself from questions about Bill Clinton by telling lawmakers that he would have to answer for his own conduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>755epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/hillary-clinton-and-the-transcript-from-her-epstein-related-talk-with-congress-part-3-9-15-26--75119013Hillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met Epstein, never flew on his plane, never visited Little St. James and knew nothing about his crimes before they became public. She described Maxwell as no more than a “casual acquaintance,” said she did not consider her a friend and attributed Maxwell’s presence around the Clinton family largely to her relationship with longtime Clinton friend Ted Waitt. Clinton acknowledged that Maxwell attended Chelsea Clinton’s 2010 wedding, but said she had no specific recollection of speaking with her there and believed Maxwell attended as Waitt’s guest. She also said she did not remember Maxwell visiting the Clintons’ Chappaqua home, despite Maxwell later saying she had been there several times, and said she had no knowledge of Epstein having connections to American or foreign intelligence services.

The questioning became much more contentious when lawmakers turned to Bill Clinton’s documented relationship with Epstein. Hillary characterized her husband’s relationship with Epstein as “limited” and primarily connected to his use of Epstein’s airplane, said she had no knowledge of Bill visiting Little St. James and maintained there was no evidence connecting him to Epstein’s crimes. When lawmakers pressed her about photographs showing Bill Clinton with Epstein, Maxwell and young women during trips, Clinton acknowledged seeing some of those photographs but said she had not become curious enough to investigate the circumstances herself, calling it simply “unfortunate” that her husband ever had dealings with Epstein. She also denied personally soliciting money from Epstein and said she was unaware of anyone doing so on her behalf, while acknowledging she knew little about whether Epstein played any role around Clinton Foundation or Clinton Global Initiative activities. The transcript therefore presented a consistent Clinton defense: she said she personally had essentially no relationship with Epstein and only a peripheral relationship with Maxwell, while repeatedly separating herself from questions about Bill Clinton by telling lawmakers that he would have to answer for his own conduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75119013Tue, 15 Sep 2026 18:30:05 +0000Bobby CapucciHillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met...Hillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met Epstein, never flew on his plane, never visited Little St. James and knew nothing about his crimes before they became public. She described Maxwell as no more than a “casual acquaintance,” said she did not consider her a friend and attributed Maxwell’s presence around the Clinton family largely to her relationship with longtime Clinton friend Ted Waitt. Clinton acknowledged that Maxwell attended Chelsea Clinton’s 2010 wedding, but said she had no specific recollection of speaking with her there and believed Maxwell attended as Waitt’s guest. She also said she did not remember Maxwell visiting the Clintons’ Chappaqua home, despite Maxwell later saying she had been there several times, and said she had no knowledge of Epstein having connections to American or foreign intelligence services.

The questioning became much more contentious when lawmakers turned to Bill Clinton’s documented relationship with Epstein. Hillary characterized her husband’s relationship with Epstein as “limited” and primarily connected to his use of Epstein’s airplane, said she had no knowledge of Bill visiting Little St. James and maintained there was no evidence connecting him to Epstein’s crimes. When lawmakers pressed her about photographs showing Bill Clinton with Epstein, Maxwell and young women during trips, Clinton acknowledged seeing some of those photographs but said she had not become curious enough to investigate the circumstances herself, calling it simply “unfortunate” that her husband ever had dealings with Epstein. She also denied personally soliciting money from Epstein and said she was unaware of anyone doing so on her behalf, while acknowledging she knew little about whether Epstein played any role around Clinton Foundation or Clinton Global Initiative activities. The transcript therefore presented a consistent Clinton defense: she said she personally had essentially no relationship with Epstein and only a peripheral relationship with Maxwell, while repeatedly separating herself from questions about Bill Clinton by telling lawmakers that he would have to answer for his own conduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>661epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/prince-andrew-whistleblower-says-british-detectives-ignored-his-evidence-9-15-26--75127615
Page’s account became especially significant because it fed directly into the long-running question of whether Andrew used royal properties and privileges to facilitate relationships with women connected to Jeffrey Epstein and Maxwell. His claims did not establish that every woman who entered the palace was being trafficked or that a crime occurred inside Buckingham Palace, and Page himself has a criminal history, including a 2009 fraud conviction, which will inevitably be used to challenge his credibility. But his allegations were specific enough to raise uncomfortable questions about security procedures, missing or incomplete visitor records and whether royal status allowed Andrew to bypass scrutiny that would have applied to almost anyone else. Thames Valley Police said it was working through a substantial volume of information, but Page’s decision to bypass British investigators and provide his evidence to the FBI underscored his central complaint: he believed potentially important firsthand evidence about Andrew’s access to women through Buckingham Palace was not being taken seriously enough at home.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75127615Tue, 15 Sep 2026 16:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciFormer royal protection officer Paul Page said British investigators looking into Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor had effectively ignored evidence he was trying to provide about Andrew’s conduct at Buckingham Palace, so Page instead took the material to...
Page’s account became especially significant because it fed directly into the long-running question of whether Andrew used royal properties and privileges to facilitate relationships with women connected to Jeffrey Epstein and Maxwell. His claims did not establish that every woman who entered the palace was being trafficked or that a crime occurred inside Buckingham Palace, and Page himself has a criminal history, including a 2009 fraud conviction, which will inevitably be used to challenge his credibility. But his allegations were specific enough to raise uncomfortable questions about security procedures, missing or incomplete visitor records and whether royal status allowed Andrew to bypass scrutiny that would have applied to almost anyone else. Thames Valley Police said it was working through a substantial volume of information, but Page’s decision to bypass British investigators and provide his evidence to the FBI underscored his central complaint: he believed potentially important firsthand evidence about Andrew’s access to women through Buckingham Palace was not being taken seriously enough at home.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1024epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/kash-patel-s-epstein-damage-control-operation-revealed-9-15-26--75127613
The larger problem exposed by the messages was that the FBI director appeared to be spending significant energy fighting a public-relations war over Epstein rather than simply letting the evidence and investigative record speak for themselves. The criticism had been fueled by frustration over delayed releases, redactions and earlier promises from administration figures that the Epstein material would produce major revelations. Patel’s texts showed that he was acutely aware of that anger and wanted the FBI to counter claims that it was participating in a cover-up, even when those claims were being amplified by dubious online accounts. That made the episode particularly striking: instead of the Epstein controversy remaining an external headache for the bureau, the released messages showed it reaching directly into the FBI director’s office, where Patel was personally directing a response to the growing suspicion and hostility surrounding the government’s handling of the case.




to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


Read the texts Kash Patel never wanted you to see: FBI boss rages at an Epstein fury facilitated by troll account | Daily Mail Online

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75127613Tue, 15 Sep 2026 14:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciFBI Director Kash Patel was shown in newly obtained internal text messages ordering aides to push back aggressively against online criticism of the Justice Department’s handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files, including criticism coming from accounts...
The larger problem exposed by the messages was that the FBI director appeared to be spending significant energy fighting a public-relations war over Epstein rather than simply letting the evidence and investigative record speak for themselves. The criticism had been fueled by frustration over delayed releases, redactions and earlier promises from administration figures that the Epstein material would produce major revelations. Patel’s texts showed that he was acutely aware of that anger and wanted the FBI to counter claims that it was participating in a cover-up, even when those claims were being amplified by dubious online accounts. That made the episode particularly striking: instead of the Epstein controversy remaining an external headache for the bureau, the released messages showed it reaching directly into the FBI director’s office, where Patel was personally directing a response to the growing suspicion and hostility surrounding the government’s handling of the case.




to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


Read the texts Kash Patel never wanted you to see: FBI boss rages at an Epstein fury facilitated by troll account | Daily Mail Online

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>646epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tara-palmeri-says-epstein-question-got-her-booted-from-the-rnc-9-15-26--75127614
The incident immediately fed criticism that Republican officials were trying to suppress uncomfortable questions about Epstein rather than confront them. The optics were especially damaging because Palmeri had been accompanied by survivors of Epstein’s abuse, including Marijke Chartouni, and because the question that apparently preceded the removal was not hostile or disruptive but concerned whether a congressional candidate supported releasing more Epstein records. Palmeri said she repeatedly sought an explanation from the RNC afterward and received none, while the RNC had not publicly explained the decision when the story broke. The episode therefore became about more than one reporter losing a credential: it reinforced the perception that Epstein had become such a politically toxic subject that even raising it at a Republican convention could trigger removal, with survivors themselves being escorted out alongside the journalist asking the question.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


Reporter Kicked Out of RNC Over Epstein Files Question - Newsweek

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75127614Tue, 15 Sep 2026 12:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIndependent journalist Tara Palmeri said she was removed from the Republican Midterm Convention in Dallas and had her press credential revoked shortly after she questioned Republican congressional candidate Robert Burke about the Jeffrey Epstein...
The incident immediately fed criticism that Republican officials were trying to suppress uncomfortable questions about Epstein rather than confront them. The optics were especially damaging because Palmeri had been accompanied by survivors of Epstein’s abuse, including Marijke Chartouni, and because the question that apparently preceded the removal was not hostile or disruptive but concerned whether a congressional candidate supported releasing more Epstein records. Palmeri said she repeatedly sought an explanation from the RNC afterward and received none, while the RNC had not publicly explained the decision when the story broke. The episode therefore became about more than one reporter losing a credential: it reinforced the perception that Epstein had become such a politically toxic subject that even raising it at a Republican convention could trigger removal, with survivors themselves being escorted out alongside the journalist asking the question.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


Reporter Kicked Out of RNC Over Epstein Files Question - Newsweek

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1044epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-state-of-idaho-notifies-kohberger-of-their-intention-to-seek-the-death-penalty-9-15-26--75119561The State of Idaho formally notified Bryan Kohberger in June 2023 that prosecutors intended to seek the death penalty if he were convicted of murdering Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. Prosecutor Bill Thompson said the State had reviewed the evidence then available and had not identified mitigating circumstances sufficient to take capital punishment off the table. The notice cited several statutory aggravating factors prosecutors believed could apply, including that multiple murders were committed, that the killings were allegedly especially heinous, atrocious or cruel, that the perpetrator exhibited utter disregard for human life, and that the murders occurred during the commission of a burglary. The filing transformed the case into a capital prosecution and dramatically expanded the stakes, discovery obligations, expert work and constitutional litigation surrounding Kohberger’s defense.

Kohberger’s defense later launched a broad attack on the death penalty, including an amended October 2024 motion asking Judge Steven Hippler to strike the State’s notice because of the methods Idaho could use to execute him. His attorneys argued that neither lethal injection nor firing squad could constitutionally be imposed, contending that Idaho’s lethal-injection system presented unacceptable risks of pain and that the firing squad amounted to cruel and unusual punishment under the federal and Idaho constitutions. The defense also emphasized that Idaho law allowed the Department of Correction to determine the specific execution procedure only after a death warrant was issued, arguing that Kohberger could face a death sentence without knowing precisely how the State intended to kill him. This amended filing was only one piece of a much broader death-penalty offensive: Kohberger’s lawyers separately challenged Idaho’s aggravating factors, the alleged arbitrariness of capital punishment, international law, contemporary standards of decency, speedy-trial pressures and other aspects of the state’s capital system. Judge Hippler ultimately rejected the core effort to remove the death penalty, leaving capital punishment available until Kohberger’s 2025 plea agreement took it off the table.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75119561Tue, 15 Sep 2026 10:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe State of Idaho formally notified Bryan Kohberger in June 2023 that prosecutors intended to seek the death penalty if he were convicted of murdering Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. Prosecutor Bill Thompson said the...The State of Idaho formally notified Bryan Kohberger in June 2023 that prosecutors intended to seek the death penalty if he were convicted of murdering Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. Prosecutor Bill Thompson said the State had reviewed the evidence then available and had not identified mitigating circumstances sufficient to take capital punishment off the table. The notice cited several statutory aggravating factors prosecutors believed could apply, including that multiple murders were committed, that the killings were allegedly especially heinous, atrocious or cruel, that the perpetrator exhibited utter disregard for human life, and that the murders occurred during the commission of a burglary. The filing transformed the case into a capital prosecution and dramatically expanded the stakes, discovery obligations, expert work and constitutional litigation surrounding Kohberger’s defense.

Kohberger’s defense later launched a broad attack on the death penalty, including an amended October 2024 motion asking Judge Steven Hippler to strike the State’s notice because of the methods Idaho could use to execute him. His attorneys argued that neither lethal injection nor firing squad could constitutionally be imposed, contending that Idaho’s lethal-injection system presented unacceptable risks of pain and that the firing squad amounted to cruel and unusual punishment under the federal and Idaho constitutions. The defense also emphasized that Idaho law allowed the Department of Correction to determine the specific execution procedure only after a death warrant was issued, arguing that Kohberger could face a death sentence without knowing precisely how the State intended to kill him. This amended filing was only one piece of a much broader death-penalty offensive: Kohberger’s lawyers separately challenged Idaho’s aggravating factors, the alleged arbitrariness of capital punishment, international law, contemporary standards of decency, speedy-trial pressures and other aspects of the state’s capital system. Judge Hippler ultimately rejected the core effort to remove the death penalty, leaving capital punishment available until Kohberger’s 2025 plea agreement took it off the table.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2499bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-s-motion-to-preclude-capital-punishment-9-15-26--75119560
Furthermore, the defense emphasizes that mitigating evidence is material when it could influence a jury's deliberations on punishment. They assert that the prosecution's duty to disclose extends beyond the immediate knowledge of the prosecutors to include information held by law enforcement officers, state lab technicians, and other state actors. By failing to provide timely and complete disclosure, the State impairs the defense's capacity to present mitigating factors, which is essential in capital cases where the death penalty is a potential outcome.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

022425-Motion-Preclude-Death-Penalty-Adopt-Necessary-Procedures-States-Disclosure-Violations.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75119560Tue, 15 Sep 2026 08:30:02 +0000Bobby Capucci​In State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger (Case No. CR01-24-31665), the defense filed a motion on February 24, 2025, to preclude the death penalty and implement additional procedures, citing the prosecution's numerous disclosure violations. The defense...
Furthermore, the defense emphasizes that mitigating evidence is material when it could influence a jury's deliberations on punishment. They assert that the prosecution's duty to disclose extends beyond the immediate knowledge of the prosecutors to include information held by law enforcement officers, state lab technicians, and other state actors. By failing to provide timely and complete disclosure, the State impairs the defense's capacity to present mitigating factors, which is essential in capital cases where the death penalty is a potential outcome.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

022425-Motion-Preclude-Death-Penalty-Adopt-Necessary-Procedures-States-Disclosure-Violations.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3480bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-zulema-pastenes-and-her-testimony-during-the-lori-vallow-trial-9-15-26--75119589Zulema Pastenes, who had been one of Lori Vallow Daybell’s close friends and later married Lori’s brother Alex Cox, gave jurors an inside look at the increasingly radical belief system surrounding Lori and Chad Daybell. Pastenes testified that Lori claimed to have visions, communicate with heavenly beings and occupy an unusually high spiritual position, while Chad introduced ideas about reincarnation, “light” and “dark” spirits, zombies and the need to remove evil from people. Pastenes said she initially believed much of what Lori and Chad taught because she trusted them and viewed them as spiritually gifted. She described how the group participated in “castings” intended to drive evil spirits from people and said Chad’s teachings included the idea that spirits could be attached to bodies by cords that had to be severed. Pastenes also testified that Lori told her Charles Vallow’s death had been orchestrated by God and was part of events that needed to occur before the Second Coming.

Her testimony became even more important when she described Alex Cox’s relationship with Lori and Chad. Pastenes said Alex would do almost anything Lori asked and increasingly relied on Lori and Chad for direction, even quitting his job and moving to Rexburg after they urged him to do so. She testified that shortly before Alex died in December 2019, he told her he was worried Lori and Chad were making him the “fall guy.” When she pressed him to explain what he had done, Alex refused to give a direct answer and instead said, “Either I am a man of God or I am not.” Pastenes also described Chad predicting that JJ Vallow would die young and testified about teachings that portrayed the destruction of a zombie’s body as necessary to prevent another dark spirit from entering it. Taken together, her testimony gave prosecutors a firsthand witness who could show how the group’s bizarre religious ideas evolved into a system that dehumanized people, justified death and placed Alex Cox in the role of Lori and Chad’s intensely loyal enforcer.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75119589Tue, 15 Sep 2026 06:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciZulema Pastenes, who had been one of Lori Vallow Daybell’s close friends and later married Lori’s brother Alex Cox, gave jurors an inside look at the increasingly radical belief system surrounding Lori and Chad Daybell. Pastenes testified that Lori...Zulema Pastenes, who had been one of Lori Vallow Daybell’s close friends and later married Lori’s brother Alex Cox, gave jurors an inside look at the increasingly radical belief system surrounding Lori and Chad Daybell. Pastenes testified that Lori claimed to have visions, communicate with heavenly beings and occupy an unusually high spiritual position, while Chad introduced ideas about reincarnation, “light” and “dark” spirits, zombies and the need to remove evil from people. Pastenes said she initially believed much of what Lori and Chad taught because she trusted them and viewed them as spiritually gifted. She described how the group participated in “castings” intended to drive evil spirits from people and said Chad’s teachings included the idea that spirits could be attached to bodies by cords that had to be severed. Pastenes also testified that Lori told her Charles Vallow’s death had been orchestrated by God and was part of events that needed to occur before the Second Coming.

Her testimony became even more important when she described Alex Cox’s relationship with Lori and Chad. Pastenes said Alex would do almost anything Lori asked and increasingly relied on Lori and Chad for direction, even quitting his job and moving to Rexburg after they urged him to do so. She testified that shortly before Alex died in December 2019, he told her he was worried Lori and Chad were making him the “fall guy.” When she pressed him to explain what he had done, Alex refused to give a direct answer and instead said, “Either I am a man of God or I am not.” Pastenes also described Chad predicting that JJ Vallow would die young and testified about teachings that portrayed the destruction of a zombie’s body as necessary to prevent another dark spirit from entering it. Taken together, her testimony gave prosecutors a firsthand witness who could show how the group’s bizarre religious ideas evolved into a system that dehumanized people, justified death and placed Alex Cox in the role of Lori and Chad’s intensely loyal enforcer.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>4127chaddaybell,charlesvallow,daybellcase,daybellcult,daybelltrial,doomsdaymom,idahosupremecourt,idahotruecrime,jjvallow,justicefortyleeandjj,loridaybell,lorivallow,lorivallowappeal,lorivallowdaybell,lorivallowtrial,tammydaybell,truecrime,truecrimecommunity,truecrimepodcast,tyleeryanfalsefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-the-idaho-supreme-court-upholds-the-gag-order-ruling--75119359
The ruling left the gag order in place but also gave the news organizations a roadmap for continuing the fight. Justice Gregory Moeller acknowledged the essential role of the press in scrutinizing the justice system while also noting the increasingly difficult balance between First Amendment rights and a defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury in the age of social media. The Goncalves family, through attorney Shanon Gray, had also challenged the gag order, arguing that it placed an unfair burden on victims’ families and interfered with their ability to speak publicly. The Idaho Supreme Court’s decision therefore did not settle the larger battle over secrecy in the case; it simply forced the media and victims’ representatives to return to the magistrate court and challenge the restrictions through the normal procedural route.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75119359Tue, 15 Sep 2026 04:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn April 2023, the Idaho Supreme Court rejected an effort by a coalition of 30 news organizations to immediately lift the sweeping gag order in the Bryan Kohberger case. The justices did not rule that the order itself was constitutional or that the...
The ruling left the gag order in place but also gave the news organizations a roadmap for continuing the fight. Justice Gregory Moeller acknowledged the essential role of the press in scrutinizing the justice system while also noting the increasingly difficult balance between First Amendment rights and a defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury in the age of social media. The Goncalves family, through attorney Shanon Gray, had also challenged the gag order, arguing that it placed an unfair burden on victims’ families and interfered with their ability to speak publicly. The Idaho Supreme Court’s decision therefore did not settle the larger battle over secrecy in the case; it simply forced the media and victims’ representatives to return to the magistrate court and challenge the restrictions through the normal procedural route.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>614bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-more-on-the-extensive-search-for-the-murder-weapon--75119325In March 2023, newly unsealed search warrants showed that Moscow investigators had been intensely focused on identifying the type of knife used to kill Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. Police had recovered a tan leather Ka-Bar sheath beside Mogen’s body, stamped with “KA-BAR,” “USMC” and the Marine Corps insignia, while the actual murder weapon was still missing. Investigators obtained six separate warrants seeking sales records from Amazon, Walmart, eBay, Blue Ridge Knives and Ka-Bar itself for specific military-style knives and matching sheaths, including the Ka-Bar 1217 and 1217S sheath. The warrants had all been sought and executed before Bryan Kohberger’s arrest, showing that detectives were already trying to trace who had purchased a knife consistent with the sheath and with the large fixed-blade weapon the coroner believed had been used in the killings.

The warrants also showed just how central the missing knife had become to the investigation. Detectives asked retailers for customer names, account information, order histories, payment details, IP addresses and communications connected to purchases of the relevant knives and sheaths, hoping to connect a specific buyer to the weapon type suggested by the crime scene. At that stage, authorities had not publicly revealed what information those retailers returned, and a knife later seized from Kohberger’s Pennsylvania family home had not been identified as the murder weapon. The significance of the filings was therefore less that police had found the knife and more that, even before Kohberger was arrested, they were systematically working backward from the sheath left at 1122 King Road to determine who had bought the matching blade and whether that trail would lead them to the killer.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75119325Tue, 15 Sep 2026 02:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn March 2023, newly unsealed search warrants showed that Moscow investigators had been intensely focused on identifying the type of knife used to kill Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. Police had recovered a tan leather...In March 2023, newly unsealed search warrants showed that Moscow investigators had been intensely focused on identifying the type of knife used to kill Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. Police had recovered a tan leather Ka-Bar sheath beside Mogen’s body, stamped with “KA-BAR,” “USMC” and the Marine Corps insignia, while the actual murder weapon was still missing. Investigators obtained six separate warrants seeking sales records from Amazon, Walmart, eBay, Blue Ridge Knives and Ka-Bar itself for specific military-style knives and matching sheaths, including the Ka-Bar 1217 and 1217S sheath. The warrants had all been sought and executed before Bryan Kohberger’s arrest, showing that detectives were already trying to trace who had purchased a knife consistent with the sheath and with the large fixed-blade weapon the coroner believed had been used in the killings.

The warrants also showed just how central the missing knife had become to the investigation. Detectives asked retailers for customer names, account information, order histories, payment details, IP addresses and communications connected to purchases of the relevant knives and sheaths, hoping to connect a specific buyer to the weapon type suggested by the crime scene. At that stage, authorities had not publicly revealed what information those retailers returned, and a knife later seized from Kohberger’s Pennsylvania family home had not been identified as the murder weapon. The significance of the filings was therefore less that police had found the knife and more that, even before Kohberger was arrested, they were systematically working backward from the sheath left at 1122 King Road to determine who had bought the matching blade and whether that trail would lead them to the killer.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1037bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcripts-day-1-part-17-9-14-26--75119014
The defense spent much of the first day attacking the manner in which the prosecution was getting its evidence into the record rather than attempting to disprove the entire prosecution theory at that stage. Kathryn Nester and Robinson’s attorneys repeatedly raised hearsay, foundation and authentication objections, arguing that investigators were being permitted to introduce reports, statements and records created by other people without those individuals appearing personally to testify. Judge Graf overruled most of those objections, reflecting the substantially lower evidentiary threshold governing a Utah preliminary hearing, whose purpose was only to determine whether probable cause existed to send Robinson to trial rather than whether prosecutors could prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. One significant exception involved an edited compilation of surveillance footage, which Graf declined to admit in that form and required prosecutors to replace with the underlying unedited material. Hull’s testimony also revealed the scope of the prosecution’s surveillance theory: investigators claimed Robinson had appeared on or around the UVU campus multiple times on September 10 and that they were attempting to stitch those appearances together into a continuous identification of the alleged shooter. By the end of day one, prosecutors had established the killing itself, the medical cause of Kirk’s death, the existence and authenticity of substantial video evidence and the beginnings of their effort to identify Robinson as the person captured in that footage. They had not yet presented many of the pieces expected to become more consequential later in the hearing, including the rifle and DNA evidence, Robinson’s alleged communications and admissions, and testimony concerning his roommate Lance Twiggs.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75119014Tue, 15 Sep 2026 00:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay one of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing on July 6, 2026, largely centered on prosecutors beginning to construct a timeline of Charlie Kirk’s killing at Utah Valley University and establishing the authenticity of the surveillance footage and...
The defense spent much of the first day attacking the manner in which the prosecution was getting its evidence into the record rather than attempting to disprove the entire prosecution theory at that stage. Kathryn Nester and Robinson’s attorneys repeatedly raised hearsay, foundation and authentication objections, arguing that investigators were being permitted to introduce reports, statements and records created by other people without those individuals appearing personally to testify. Judge Graf overruled most of those objections, reflecting the substantially lower evidentiary threshold governing a Utah preliminary hearing, whose purpose was only to determine whether probable cause existed to send Robinson to trial rather than whether prosecutors could prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. One significant exception involved an edited compilation of surveillance footage, which Graf declined to admit in that form and required prosecutors to replace with the underlying unedited material. Hull’s testimony also revealed the scope of the prosecution’s surveillance theory: investigators claimed Robinson had appeared on or around the UVU campus multiple times on September 10 and that they were attempting to stitch those appearances together into a continuous identification of the alleged shooter. By the end of day one, prosecutors had established the killing itself, the medical cause of Kirk’s death, the existence and authenticity of substantial video evidence and the beginnings of their effort to identify Robinson as the person captured in that footage. They had not yet presented many of the pieces expected to become more consequential later in the hearing, including the rifle and DNA evidence, Robinson’s alleged communications and admissions, and testimony concerning his roommate Lance Twiggs.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>795breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcripts-day-1-part-16-9-13-26--75102541
The defense spent much of the first day attacking the manner in which the prosecution was getting its evidence into the record rather than attempting to disprove the entire prosecution theory at that stage. Kathryn Nester and Robinson’s attorneys repeatedly raised hearsay, foundation and authentication objections, arguing that investigators were being permitted to introduce reports, statements and records created by other people without those individuals appearing personally to testify. Judge Graf overruled most of those objections, reflecting the substantially lower evidentiary threshold governing a Utah preliminary hearing, whose purpose was only to determine whether probable cause existed to send Robinson to trial rather than whether prosecutors could prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. One significant exception involved an edited compilation of surveillance footage, which Graf declined to admit in that form and required prosecutors to replace with the underlying unedited material. Hull’s testimony also revealed the scope of the prosecution’s surveillance theory: investigators claimed Robinson had appeared on or around the UVU campus multiple times on September 10 and that they were attempting to stitch those appearances together into a continuous identification of the alleged shooter. By the end of day one, prosecutors had established the killing itself, the medical cause of Kirk’s death, the existence and authenticity of substantial video evidence and the beginnings of their effort to identify Robinson as the person captured in that footage. They had not yet presented many of the pieces expected to become more consequential later in the hearing, including the rifle and DNA evidence, Robinson’s alleged communications and admissions, and testimony concerning his roommate Lance Twiggs.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75102541Mon, 14 Sep 2026 22:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay one of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing on July 6, 2026, largely centered on prosecutors beginning to construct a timeline of Charlie Kirk’s killing at Utah Valley University and establishing the authenticity of the surveillance footage and...
The defense spent much of the first day attacking the manner in which the prosecution was getting its evidence into the record rather than attempting to disprove the entire prosecution theory at that stage. Kathryn Nester and Robinson’s attorneys repeatedly raised hearsay, foundation and authentication objections, arguing that investigators were being permitted to introduce reports, statements and records created by other people without those individuals appearing personally to testify. Judge Graf overruled most of those objections, reflecting the substantially lower evidentiary threshold governing a Utah preliminary hearing, whose purpose was only to determine whether probable cause existed to send Robinson to trial rather than whether prosecutors could prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. One significant exception involved an edited compilation of surveillance footage, which Graf declined to admit in that form and required prosecutors to replace with the underlying unedited material. Hull’s testimony also revealed the scope of the prosecution’s surveillance theory: investigators claimed Robinson had appeared on or around the UVU campus multiple times on September 10 and that they were attempting to stitch those appearances together into a continuous identification of the alleged shooter. By the end of day one, prosecutors had established the killing itself, the medical cause of Kirk’s death, the existence and authenticity of substantial video evidence and the beginnings of their effort to identify Robinson as the person captured in that footage. They had not yet presented many of the pieces expected to become more consequential later in the hearing, including the rifle and DNA evidence, Robinson’s alleged communications and admissions, and testimony concerning his roommate Lance Twiggs.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>784breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/hillary-clinton-and-the-transcript-from-her-epstein-related-talk-with-congress-part-2-9-14-26--75119012Hillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met Epstein, never flew on his plane, never visited Little St. James and knew nothing about his crimes before they became public. She described Maxwell as no more than a “casual acquaintance,” said she did not consider her a friend and attributed Maxwell’s presence around the Clinton family largely to her relationship with longtime Clinton friend Ted Waitt. Clinton acknowledged that Maxwell attended Chelsea Clinton’s 2010 wedding, but said she had no specific recollection of speaking with her there and believed Maxwell attended as Waitt’s guest. She also said she did not remember Maxwell visiting the Clintons’ Chappaqua home, despite Maxwell later saying she had been there several times, and said she had no knowledge of Epstein having connections to American or foreign intelligence services.

The questioning became much more contentious when lawmakers turned to Bill Clinton’s documented relationship with Epstein. Hillary characterized her husband’s relationship with Epstein as “limited” and primarily connected to his use of Epstein’s airplane, said she had no knowledge of Bill visiting Little St. James and maintained there was no evidence connecting him to Epstein’s crimes. When lawmakers pressed her about photographs showing Bill Clinton with Epstein, Maxwell and young women during trips, Clinton acknowledged seeing some of those photographs but said she had not become curious enough to investigate the circumstances herself, calling it simply “unfortunate” that her husband ever had dealings with Epstein. She also denied personally soliciting money from Epstein and said she was unaware of anyone doing so on her behalf, while acknowledging she knew little about whether Epstein played any role around Clinton Foundation or Clinton Global Initiative activities. The transcript therefore presented a consistent Clinton defense: she said she personally had essentially no relationship with Epstein and only a peripheral relationship with Maxwell, while repeatedly separating herself from questions about Bill Clinton by telling lawmakers that he would have to answer for his own conduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75119012Mon, 14 Sep 2026 20:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciHillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met...Hillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met Epstein, never flew on his plane, never visited Little St. James and knew nothing about his crimes before they became public. She described Maxwell as no more than a “casual acquaintance,” said she did not consider her a friend and attributed Maxwell’s presence around the Clinton family largely to her relationship with longtime Clinton friend Ted Waitt. Clinton acknowledged that Maxwell attended Chelsea Clinton’s 2010 wedding, but said she had no specific recollection of speaking with her there and believed Maxwell attended as Waitt’s guest. She also said she did not remember Maxwell visiting the Clintons’ Chappaqua home, despite Maxwell later saying she had been there several times, and said she had no knowledge of Epstein having connections to American or foreign intelligence services.

The questioning became much more contentious when lawmakers turned to Bill Clinton’s documented relationship with Epstein. Hillary characterized her husband’s relationship with Epstein as “limited” and primarily connected to his use of Epstein’s airplane, said she had no knowledge of Bill visiting Little St. James and maintained there was no evidence connecting him to Epstein’s crimes. When lawmakers pressed her about photographs showing Bill Clinton with Epstein, Maxwell and young women during trips, Clinton acknowledged seeing some of those photographs but said she had not become curious enough to investigate the circumstances herself, calling it simply “unfortunate” that her husband ever had dealings with Epstein. She also denied personally soliciting money from Epstein and said she was unaware of anyone doing so on her behalf, while acknowledging she knew little about whether Epstein played any role around Clinton Foundation or Clinton Global Initiative activities. The transcript therefore presented a consistent Clinton defense: she said she personally had essentially no relationship with Epstein and only a peripheral relationship with Maxwell, while repeatedly separating herself from questions about Bill Clinton by telling lawmakers that he would have to answer for his own conduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>672epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/hillary-clinton-and-the-transcript-from-her-epstein-related-talk-with-congress-part-1-9-14-26--75119011Hillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met Epstein, never flew on his plane, never visited Little St. James and knew nothing about his crimes before they became public. She described Maxwell as no more than a “casual acquaintance,” said she did not consider her a friend and attributed Maxwell’s presence around the Clinton family largely to her relationship with longtime Clinton friend Ted Waitt. Clinton acknowledged that Maxwell attended Chelsea Clinton’s 2010 wedding, but said she had no specific recollection of speaking with her there and believed Maxwell attended as Waitt’s guest. She also said she did not remember Maxwell visiting the Clintons’ Chappaqua home, despite Maxwell later saying she had been there several times, and said she had no knowledge of Epstein having connections to American or foreign intelligence services.

The questioning became much more contentious when lawmakers turned to Bill Clinton’s documented relationship with Epstein. Hillary characterized her husband’s relationship with Epstein as “limited” and primarily connected to his use of Epstein’s airplane, said she had no knowledge of Bill visiting Little St. James and maintained there was no evidence connecting him to Epstein’s crimes. When lawmakers pressed her about photographs showing Bill Clinton with Epstein, Maxwell and young women during trips, Clinton acknowledged seeing some of those photographs but said she had not become curious enough to investigate the circumstances herself, calling it simply “unfortunate” that her husband ever had dealings with Epstein. She also denied personally soliciting money from Epstein and said she was unaware of anyone doing so on her behalf, while acknowledging she knew little about whether Epstein played any role around Clinton Foundation or Clinton Global Initiative activities. The transcript therefore presented a consistent Clinton defense: she said she personally had essentially no relationship with Epstein and only a peripheral relationship with Maxwell, while repeatedly separating herself from questions about Bill Clinton by telling lawmakers that he would have to answer for his own conduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75119011Mon, 14 Sep 2026 18:30:05 +0000Bobby CapucciHillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met...Hillary Clinton’s February 26, 2026 deposition before the House Oversight Committee centered on how much she knew about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton’s relationship with them. Clinton repeatedly testified that she had never met Epstein, never flew on his plane, never visited Little St. James and knew nothing about his crimes before they became public. She described Maxwell as no more than a “casual acquaintance,” said she did not consider her a friend and attributed Maxwell’s presence around the Clinton family largely to her relationship with longtime Clinton friend Ted Waitt. Clinton acknowledged that Maxwell attended Chelsea Clinton’s 2010 wedding, but said she had no specific recollection of speaking with her there and believed Maxwell attended as Waitt’s guest. She also said she did not remember Maxwell visiting the Clintons’ Chappaqua home, despite Maxwell later saying she had been there several times, and said she had no knowledge of Epstein having connections to American or foreign intelligence services.

The questioning became much more contentious when lawmakers turned to Bill Clinton’s documented relationship with Epstein. Hillary characterized her husband’s relationship with Epstein as “limited” and primarily connected to his use of Epstein’s airplane, said she had no knowledge of Bill visiting Little St. James and maintained there was no evidence connecting him to Epstein’s crimes. When lawmakers pressed her about photographs showing Bill Clinton with Epstein, Maxwell and young women during trips, Clinton acknowledged seeing some of those photographs but said she had not become curious enough to investigate the circumstances herself, calling it simply “unfortunate” that her husband ever had dealings with Epstein. She also denied personally soliciting money from Epstein and said she was unaware of anyone doing so on her behalf, while acknowledging she knew little about whether Epstein played any role around Clinton Foundation or Clinton Global Initiative activities. The transcript therefore presented a consistent Clinton defense: she said she personally had essentially no relationship with Epstein and only a peripheral relationship with Maxwell, while repeatedly separating herself from questions about Bill Clinton by telling lawmakers that he would have to answer for his own conduct.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>848epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-most-transparent-administration-the-epstein-files-say-otherwise-part-2-9-14-26--75090468
Those suspicions have intensified as prominent online accounts that defended the administration’s Epstein narrative have also been revealed to have government ties. DataRepublican, one of the accounts that publicly echoed the administration’s position on Epstein, was later confirmed to be operated by Jennica Pounds, who became a Special Government Employee at the Pentagon after previously holding press credentials there. The overlap raises serious questions about the independence of influencers who present themselves as outside critics of government while simultaneously maintaining official relationships with it. The broader criticism is that political loyalty has begun to replace consistency, with figures who once demanded transparency and distrusted federal institutions suddenly urging the public to accept the government’s conclusions on Epstein without further scrutiny. For those who have followed the case for years, the result is a familiar pattern: powerful institutions close ranks, survivors continue waiting for full accountability, and anyone who refuses to stop asking questions is treated as the problem rather than the secrecy itself.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75090468Mon, 14 Sep 2026 16:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe Trump administration continues to promote itself as historically transparent, but its handling of Jeffrey Epstein-related records is fueling renewed criticism as European authorities seek information for their own investigations. Officials in...
Those suspicions have intensified as prominent online accounts that defended the administration’s Epstein narrative have also been revealed to have government ties. DataRepublican, one of the accounts that publicly echoed the administration’s position on Epstein, was later confirmed to be operated by Jennica Pounds, who became a Special Government Employee at the Pentagon after previously holding press credentials there. The overlap raises serious questions about the independence of influencers who present themselves as outside critics of government while simultaneously maintaining official relationships with it. The broader criticism is that political loyalty has begun to replace consistency, with figures who once demanded transparency and distrusted federal institutions suddenly urging the public to accept the government’s conclusions on Epstein without further scrutiny. For those who have followed the case for years, the result is a familiar pattern: powerful institutions close ranks, survivors continue waiting for full accountability, and anyone who refuses to stop asking questions is treated as the problem rather than the secrecy itself.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>673epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-most-transparent-administration-the-epstein-files-say-otherwise-part-1-9-14-26--75090467
Those suspicions have intensified as prominent online accounts that defended the administration’s Epstein narrative have also been revealed to have government ties. DataRepublican, one of the accounts that publicly echoed the administration’s position on Epstein, was later confirmed to be operated by Jennica Pounds, who became a Special Government Employee at the Pentagon after previously holding press credentials there. The overlap raises serious questions about the independence of influencers who present themselves as outside critics of government while simultaneously maintaining official relationships with it. The broader criticism is that political loyalty has begun to replace consistency, with figures who once demanded transparency and distrusted federal institutions suddenly urging the public to accept the government’s conclusions on Epstein without further scrutiny. For those who have followed the case for years, the result is a familiar pattern: powerful institutions close ranks, survivors continue waiting for full accountability, and anyone who refuses to stop asking questions is treated as the problem rather than the secrecy itself.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75090467Mon, 14 Sep 2026 14:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe Trump administration continues to promote itself as historically transparent, but its handling of Jeffrey Epstein-related records is fueling renewed criticism as European authorities seek information for their own investigations. Officials in...
Those suspicions have intensified as prominent online accounts that defended the administration’s Epstein narrative have also been revealed to have government ties. DataRepublican, one of the accounts that publicly echoed the administration’s position on Epstein, was later confirmed to be operated by Jennica Pounds, who became a Special Government Employee at the Pentagon after previously holding press credentials there. The overlap raises serious questions about the independence of influencers who present themselves as outside critics of government while simultaneously maintaining official relationships with it. The broader criticism is that political loyalty has begun to replace consistency, with figures who once demanded transparency and distrusted federal institutions suddenly urging the public to accept the government’s conclusions on Epstein without further scrutiny. For those who have followed the case for years, the result is a familiar pattern: powerful institutions close ranks, survivors continue waiting for full accountability, and anyone who refuses to stop asking questions is treated as the problem rather than the secrecy itself.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>706epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/france-identifies-potential-recruiters-in-jeffrey-epstein-s-network-9-14-26--75088873

The development came after French modeling scout Daniel Siad, who had been accused of helping Epstein traffic women, was found dead at his home in July before investigators could question him. France had already examined figures from the modeling industry tied to Epstein, including Jean-Luc Brunel, who was arrested in 2020 on allegations involving rape of minors and trafficking for sexual exploitation before dying in jail in 2022. Authorities had also previously investigated former Elite modeling executive Gerald Marie, though that case was dropped because the statute of limitations had expired; Marie denied wrongdoing and said he had met Epstein only once. The new probe suggested French prosecutors were no longer treating Epstein’s French connections as a closed chapter, but were instead trying to identify the people who may have helped recruit women into his orbit and reconstruct how that network operated across borders.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

France's Epstein probe identifies 'potential recruiters' | Courthouse News Service

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75088873Mon, 14 Sep 2026 12:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciFrench prosecutors said their investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s network had identified additional people who may have acted as recruiters, expanding the inquiry beyond the figures already publicly associated with him. Paris prosecutor Laure Beccuau...

The development came after French modeling scout Daniel Siad, who had been accused of helping Epstein traffic women, was found dead at his home in July before investigators could question him. France had already examined figures from the modeling industry tied to Epstein, including Jean-Luc Brunel, who was arrested in 2020 on allegations involving rape of minors and trafficking for sexual exploitation before dying in jail in 2022. Authorities had also previously investigated former Elite modeling executive Gerald Marie, though that case was dropped because the statute of limitations had expired; Marie denied wrongdoing and said he had met Epstein only once. The new probe suggested French prosecutors were no longer treating Epstein’s French connections as a closed chapter, but were instead trying to identify the people who may have helped recruit women into his orbit and reconstruct how that network operated across borders.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

France's Epstein probe identifies 'potential recruiters' | Courthouse News Service

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>997epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-melanie-gibb-and-her-testimony-during-the-lori-vallow-trial-9-14-26--75107407Melanie Gibb’s testimony was some of the most damaging evidence against Lori Vallow because she described, from inside Lori and Chad Daybell’s circle, how their increasingly radical belief system developed alongside the deaths of people they considered obstacles. Gibb testified that Lori and Chad believed people could become “dark,” possessed by evil spirits or transformed into “zombies,” and she identified Charles Vallow, Tylee Ryan, JJ Vallow and Tammy Daybell as people who had been given those labels before they died. She said Lori believed she and Chad had been married in past lives, were spiritually chosen to lead the 144,000 and could perform “castings” to drive evil spirits from people. Gibb also testified that Lori’s relationship with Chad increasingly distracted her from caring for JJ and that Lori claimed JJ had become possessed, even though Gibb personally saw nothing abnormal about his behavior. Gibb described a disturbing pattern in which people who questioned Lori, became suspicious of her or stood in the way of her relationship with Chad suddenly became labeled dark or zombie.

Gibb also placed herself at the center of one of the prosecution’s most important pieces of evidence: Lori’s effort to conceal JJ’s disappearance. When police came looking for JJ in November 2019, Lori falsely told them that he was staying with Gibb in Arizona. Gibb initially repeated part of that lie to police, then became alarmed and eventually contacted investigators. She secretly recorded a December 2019 phone call in which she confronted Lori and Chad about JJ’s whereabouts, telling Lori that what was happening did not feel like “God’s plan.” Lori refused to reveal where JJ was and insisted he was safe, while Chad accused Gibb of being influenced by dark forces. Gibb also testified that Alex Cox later told her she did not want to know what had happened to JJ. Her testimony gave jurors a firsthand account of the progression from fringe religious beliefs to deception about missing children, while showing that Lori was actively constructing false explanations for JJ’s whereabouts after prosecutors said he was already dead and buried on Chad Daybell’s property.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75107407Mon, 14 Sep 2026 10:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciMelanie Gibb’s testimony was some of the most damaging evidence against Lori Vallow because she described, from inside Lori and Chad Daybell’s circle, how their increasingly radical belief system developed alongside the deaths of people they...Melanie Gibb’s testimony was some of the most damaging evidence against Lori Vallow because she described, from inside Lori and Chad Daybell’s circle, how their increasingly radical belief system developed alongside the deaths of people they considered obstacles. Gibb testified that Lori and Chad believed people could become “dark,” possessed by evil spirits or transformed into “zombies,” and she identified Charles Vallow, Tylee Ryan, JJ Vallow and Tammy Daybell as people who had been given those labels before they died. She said Lori believed she and Chad had been married in past lives, were spiritually chosen to lead the 144,000 and could perform “castings” to drive evil spirits from people. Gibb also testified that Lori’s relationship with Chad increasingly distracted her from caring for JJ and that Lori claimed JJ had become possessed, even though Gibb personally saw nothing abnormal about his behavior. Gibb described a disturbing pattern in which people who questioned Lori, became suspicious of her or stood in the way of her relationship with Chad suddenly became labeled dark or zombie.

Gibb also placed herself at the center of one of the prosecution’s most important pieces of evidence: Lori’s effort to conceal JJ’s disappearance. When police came looking for JJ in November 2019, Lori falsely told them that he was staying with Gibb in Arizona. Gibb initially repeated part of that lie to police, then became alarmed and eventually contacted investigators. She secretly recorded a December 2019 phone call in which she confronted Lori and Chad about JJ’s whereabouts, telling Lori that what was happening did not feel like “God’s plan.” Lori refused to reveal where JJ was and insisted he was safe, while Chad accused Gibb of being influenced by dark forces. Gibb also testified that Alex Cox later told her she did not want to know what had happened to JJ. Her testimony gave jurors a firsthand account of the progression from fringe religious beliefs to deception about missing children, while showing that Lori was actively constructing false explanations for JJ’s whereabouts after prosecutors said he was already dead and buried on Chad Daybell’s property.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>4084chaddaybell,charlesvallow,daybellcase,daybellcult,daybelltrial,doomsdaymom,idahosupremecourt,idahotruecrime,jjvallow,justicefortyleeandjj,loridaybell,lorivallow,lorivallowappeal,lorivallowdaybell,lorivallowtrial,tammydaybell,truecrime,truecrimecommunity,truecrimepodcast,tyleeryantruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-media-coalition-in-the-kohberger-case-and-their-battle-for-courtroom-access-9-14-26--75102559The media covering the Bryan Kohberger case fought aggressively for courtroom access because they argued that one of the most closely watched murder prosecutions in the country should remain open and visible to the public. A coalition of roughly 20 news organizations, including the Associated Press, The Idaho Statesman, The New York Times, The Washington Post, television stations and journalism groups, formally intervened in the case and challenged restrictions on both press access and public discussion. When Judge John Judge began reconsidering whether cameras should remain in the courtroom, the coalition argued that video and still photography were essential to transparency and public understanding, particularly in a case already drowning in rumors and misinformation. Attorney Wendy Olson, representing the media organizations, repeatedly argued that the solution to sensationalism was not less access but more accurate firsthand coverage, telling the court that cameras allowed people to see what actually happened rather than relying on social-media interpretations or selective descriptions.

The fight became especially intense after Kohberger’s defense argued that photographers and television cameras were turning the proceedings into a spectacle, repeatedly focusing on Kohberger’s facial expressions and movements and potentially poisoning the future jury pool. Prosecutors eventually joined the defense in opposing independent media cameras, while the news coalition continued pushing back and insisting that Idaho’s existing courtroom rules already gave the judge sufficient power to control improper coverage. Judge initially allowed cameras to remain while reserving the right to revisit the issue, but by November 2023 he concluded that media photographers had continued focusing too heavily on Kohberger despite his instructions. He ultimately barred news organizations from operating their own cameras inside the courtroom, replacing them with a court-controlled livestream so the public could still watch the proceedings. The media did not get everything it wanted, but its sustained intervention ensured that the issue was repeatedly litigated and that even after independent cameras were removed, the Kohberger proceedings did not simply disappear behind closed courtroom doors.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75102559Mon, 14 Sep 2026 08:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe media covering the Bryan Kohberger case fought aggressively for courtroom access because they argued that one of the most closely watched murder prosecutions in the country should remain open and visible to the public. A coalition of roughly 20...The media covering the Bryan Kohberger case fought aggressively for courtroom access because they argued that one of the most closely watched murder prosecutions in the country should remain open and visible to the public. A coalition of roughly 20 news organizations, including the Associated Press, The Idaho Statesman, The New York Times, The Washington Post, television stations and journalism groups, formally intervened in the case and challenged restrictions on both press access and public discussion. When Judge John Judge began reconsidering whether cameras should remain in the courtroom, the coalition argued that video and still photography were essential to transparency and public understanding, particularly in a case already drowning in rumors and misinformation. Attorney Wendy Olson, representing the media organizations, repeatedly argued that the solution to sensationalism was not less access but more accurate firsthand coverage, telling the court that cameras allowed people to see what actually happened rather than relying on social-media interpretations or selective descriptions.

The fight became especially intense after Kohberger’s defense argued that photographers and television cameras were turning the proceedings into a spectacle, repeatedly focusing on Kohberger’s facial expressions and movements and potentially poisoning the future jury pool. Prosecutors eventually joined the defense in opposing independent media cameras, while the news coalition continued pushing back and insisting that Idaho’s existing courtroom rules already gave the judge sufficient power to control improper coverage. Judge initially allowed cameras to remain while reserving the right to revisit the issue, but by November 2023 he concluded that media photographers had continued focusing too heavily on Kohberger despite his instructions. He ultimately barred news organizations from operating their own cameras inside the courtroom, replacing them with a court-controlled livestream so the public could still watch the proceedings. The media did not get everything it wanted, but its sustained intervention ensured that the issue was repeatedly litigated and that even after independent cameras were removed, the Kohberger proceedings did not simply disappear behind closed courtroom doors.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2386bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-family-members-of-the-victims-in-moscow-push-for-more-access-9-14-26--75102558Families of the four University of Idaho murder victims repeatedly complained that they were being kept too far outside the investigation and were not receiving the level of communication they believed they deserved. The Goncalves family was especially vocal, saying they were frustrated by shifting statements from police, long stretches without meaningful updates and the experience of learning important developments through the media instead of directly from investigators. Their attorney, Shanon Gray, criticized what he described as inconsistent communication and questioned whether the family was being given enough access to information about the progress of the case. The Kernodle family also expressed frustration, particularly as weeks passed without an arrest and basic questions about motive, targeting and the timeline remained unanswered. From the families’ perspective, they were not asking to control the investigation; they wanted to understand what was happening in the case that had taken their children and siblings.

Police, however, argued that there were limits to what they could share without compromising the investigation. Moscow Police Chief James Fry and other officials said they had to protect witness information, preserve the integrity of evidence and avoid releasing details that could tip off a suspect or contaminate future testimony. That created a painful conflict: investigators believed secrecy was necessary, while the families often experienced that secrecy as exclusion. The tension became one of the defining features of the early Moscow investigation, with some relatives publicly pressuring law enforcement because they feared the case was stalling while police insisted that work was progressing behind the scenes. Kohberger’s arrest later showed that investigators had, in fact, been developing significant evidence during that period, but it did not erase the families’ complaints that the communication process itself had been inadequate and had left them feeling shut out of the investigation into the murders of their own loved ones.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protnmail.com



Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75102558Mon, 14 Sep 2026 06:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciFamilies of the four University of Idaho murder victims repeatedly complained that they were being kept too far outside the investigation and were not receiving the level of communication they believed they deserved. The Goncalves family was...Families of the four University of Idaho murder victims repeatedly complained that they were being kept too far outside the investigation and were not receiving the level of communication they believed they deserved. The Goncalves family was especially vocal, saying they were frustrated by shifting statements from police, long stretches without meaningful updates and the experience of learning important developments through the media instead of directly from investigators. Their attorney, Shanon Gray, criticized what he described as inconsistent communication and questioned whether the family was being given enough access to information about the progress of the case. The Kernodle family also expressed frustration, particularly as weeks passed without an arrest and basic questions about motive, targeting and the timeline remained unanswered. From the families’ perspective, they were not asking to control the investigation; they wanted to understand what was happening in the case that had taken their children and siblings.

Police, however, argued that there were limits to what they could share without compromising the investigation. Moscow Police Chief James Fry and other officials said they had to protect witness information, preserve the integrity of evidence and avoid releasing details that could tip off a suspect or contaminate future testimony. That created a painful conflict: investigators believed secrecy was necessary, while the families often experienced that secrecy as exclusion. The tension became one of the defining features of the early Moscow investigation, with some relatives publicly pressuring law enforcement because they feared the case was stalling while police insisted that work was progressing behind the scenes. Kohberger’s arrest later showed that investigators had, in fact, been developing significant evidence during that period, but it did not erase the families’ complaints that the communication process itself had been inadequate and had left them feeling shut out of the investigation into the murders of their own loved ones.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protnmail.com



Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2575bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-bryan-kohberger-and-the-missing-knife--75105171At the time of the Newsweek report, one of the biggest missing pieces in the Bryan Kohberger case was the murder weapon itself. Investigators believed a large fixed-blade knife, likely a Ka-Bar or similar weapon, had been used to kill Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, largely because a tan leather Ka-Bar sheath had been found on the bed beside Mogen. DNA recovered from the sheath’s button snap had been linked to Kohberger, making the sheath one of the prosecution’s most important physical pieces of evidence. But police had not recovered the actual knife, and legal experts said that absence could have mattered greatly at trial. If prosecutors had found the weapon and tied it directly to Kohberger through DNA, purchase records, fingerprints or microscopic evidence, it could have provided another powerful link between him and the murders. Without it, the State would have had to prove its case through the sheath, DNA, cellphone records, surveillance footage and the white Hyundai Elantra rather than through the weapon itself.


The missing knife also created an obvious opening for the defense, which could have argued that possession of or contact with a sheath did not necessarily prove Kohberger had wielded the weapon that killed the four students. At the time, investigators had searched Kohberger’s apartment, his parents’ Pennsylvania home, his Hyundai and other locations without publicly announcing that they had located the murder weapon. Experts told Newsweek that recovering it could have helped answer questions about blood, trace evidence and whether the blade was actually consistent with the victims’ injuries, while its continued absence left a significant gap in the physical-evidence chain. Later disclosures strengthened the prosecution’s theory by showing that Kohberger had purchased a Ka-Bar knife, sheath and sharpener from Amazon months before the killings, but the knife itself remained missing. The article therefore focused on a simple but potentially crucial issue: prosecutors had a sheath they said carried Kohberger’s DNA, but they still did not have the object that had actually inflicted the wounds.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75105171Mon, 14 Sep 2026 04:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciAt the time of the Newsweek report, one of the biggest missing pieces in the Bryan Kohberger case was the murder weapon itself. Investigators believed a large fixed-blade knife, likely a Ka-Bar or similar weapon, had been used to kill Kaylee...At the time of the Newsweek report, one of the biggest missing pieces in the Bryan Kohberger case was the murder weapon itself. Investigators believed a large fixed-blade knife, likely a Ka-Bar or similar weapon, had been used to kill Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, largely because a tan leather Ka-Bar sheath had been found on the bed beside Mogen. DNA recovered from the sheath’s button snap had been linked to Kohberger, making the sheath one of the prosecution’s most important physical pieces of evidence. But police had not recovered the actual knife, and legal experts said that absence could have mattered greatly at trial. If prosecutors had found the weapon and tied it directly to Kohberger through DNA, purchase records, fingerprints or microscopic evidence, it could have provided another powerful link between him and the murders. Without it, the State would have had to prove its case through the sheath, DNA, cellphone records, surveillance footage and the white Hyundai Elantra rather than through the weapon itself.


The missing knife also created an obvious opening for the defense, which could have argued that possession of or contact with a sheath did not necessarily prove Kohberger had wielded the weapon that killed the four students. At the time, investigators had searched Kohberger’s apartment, his parents’ Pennsylvania home, his Hyundai and other locations without publicly announcing that they had located the murder weapon. Experts told Newsweek that recovering it could have helped answer questions about blood, trace evidence and whether the blade was actually consistent with the victims’ injuries, while its continued absence left a significant gap in the physical-evidence chain. Later disclosures strengthened the prosecution’s theory by showing that Kohberger had purchased a Ka-Bar knife, sheath and sharpener from Amazon months before the killings, but the knife itself remained missing. The article therefore focused on a simple but potentially crucial issue: prosecutors had a sheath they said carried Kohberger’s DNA, but they still did not have the object that had actually inflicted the wounds.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>847epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-bryan-kohberger-and-the-memo-on-gag-order-points-and-authorities--75105170

The filing reflected the extraordinary publicity already surrounding the Moscow murders only weeks after Kohberger’s arrest. The State pointed to precedent recognizing the danger that statements by attorneys and other participants could influence prospective jurors, affect witness testimony and make it harder to seat an unbiased jury. At the same time, the dispute raised competing First Amendment and victims’ rights concerns, particularly because the Goncalves family wanted its lawyer free to speak on its behalf. The memorandum did not ask the court to determine Kohberger’s guilt or discuss the strength of the murder evidence; it was essentially the prosecution’s legal brief explaining why the court possessed broad authority to control public statements while the case was pending. The controversy eventually expanded beyond the family’s attorney, with major news organizations challenging the nondissemination restrictions before the Idaho Supreme Court, making the memorandum one of the earliest documents in what became a long-running battle over whether protecting Kohberger’s fair-trial rights justified limiting public discussion of one of the most heavily covered murder cases in the country.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75105170Mon, 14 Sep 2026 02:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe “Memorandum of Points and Authorities” filed by the State on February 8, 2023 dealt with the sweeping nondissemination, or gag, order imposed in the Bryan Kohberger case. It came after attorney Shanon Gray, representing the Goncalves family, asked...

The filing reflected the extraordinary publicity already surrounding the Moscow murders only weeks after Kohberger’s arrest. The State pointed to precedent recognizing the danger that statements by attorneys and other participants could influence prospective jurors, affect witness testimony and make it harder to seat an unbiased jury. At the same time, the dispute raised competing First Amendment and victims’ rights concerns, particularly because the Goncalves family wanted its lawyer free to speak on its behalf. The memorandum did not ask the court to determine Kohberger’s guilt or discuss the strength of the murder evidence; it was essentially the prosecution’s legal brief explaining why the court possessed broad authority to control public statements while the case was pending. The controversy eventually expanded beyond the family’s attorney, with major news organizations challenging the nondissemination restrictions before the Idaho Supreme Court, making the memorandum one of the earliest documents in what became a long-running battle over whether protecting Kohberger’s fair-trial rights justified limiting public discussion of one of the most heavily covered murder cases in the country.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1659epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcripts-day-1-part-15-9-13-26--75102545
The defense spent much of the first day attacking the manner in which the prosecution was getting its evidence into the record rather than attempting to disprove the entire prosecution theory at that stage. Kathryn Nester and Robinson’s attorneys repeatedly raised hearsay, foundation and authentication objections, arguing that investigators were being permitted to introduce reports, statements and records created by other people without those individuals appearing personally to testify. Judge Graf overruled most of those objections, reflecting the substantially lower evidentiary threshold governing a Utah preliminary hearing, whose purpose was only to determine whether probable cause existed to send Robinson to trial rather than whether prosecutors could prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. One significant exception involved an edited compilation of surveillance footage, which Graf declined to admit in that form and required prosecutors to replace with the underlying unedited material. Hull’s testimony also revealed the scope of the prosecution’s surveillance theory: investigators claimed Robinson had appeared on or around the UVU campus multiple times on September 10 and that they were attempting to stitch those appearances together into a continuous identification of the alleged shooter. By the end of day one, prosecutors had established the killing itself, the medical cause of Kirk’s death, the existence and authenticity of substantial video evidence and the beginnings of their effort to identify Robinson as the person captured in that footage. They had not yet presented many of the pieces expected to become more consequential later in the hearing, including the rifle and DNA evidence, Robinson’s alleged communications and admissions, and testimony concerning his roommate Lance Twiggs.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75102545Mon, 14 Sep 2026 00:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay one of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing on July 6, 2026, largely centered on prosecutors beginning to construct a timeline of Charlie Kirk’s killing at Utah Valley University and establishing the authenticity of the surveillance footage and...
The defense spent much of the first day attacking the manner in which the prosecution was getting its evidence into the record rather than attempting to disprove the entire prosecution theory at that stage. Kathryn Nester and Robinson’s attorneys repeatedly raised hearsay, foundation and authentication objections, arguing that investigators were being permitted to introduce reports, statements and records created by other people without those individuals appearing personally to testify. Judge Graf overruled most of those objections, reflecting the substantially lower evidentiary threshold governing a Utah preliminary hearing, whose purpose was only to determine whether probable cause existed to send Robinson to trial rather than whether prosecutors could prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. One significant exception involved an edited compilation of surveillance footage, which Graf declined to admit in that form and required prosecutors to replace with the underlying unedited material. Hull’s testimony also revealed the scope of the prosecution’s surveillance theory: investigators claimed Robinson had appeared on or around the UVU campus multiple times on September 10 and that they were attempting to stitch those appearances together into a continuous identification of the alleged shooter. By the end of day one, prosecutors had established the killing itself, the medical cause of Kirk’s death, the existence and authenticity of substantial video evidence and the beginnings of their effort to identify Robinson as the person captured in that footage. They had not yet presented many of the pieces expected to become more consequential later in the hearing, including the rifle and DNA evidence, Robinson’s alleged communications and admissions, and testimony concerning his roommate Lance Twiggs.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>725breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/jp-morgan-and-their-unredacted-opposition-to-jes-staley-dismissing-the-lawsuit-part-4-9-13-26--75090790JPMorgan Chase’s memorandum of law opposed Jes Staley’s effort to dismiss the bank’s third-party claims against him in the Epstein litigation, arguing that Staley’s own conduct was central to why JPMorgan faced massive legal exposure in the first place. The bank portrayed Staley as far more than an executive who happened to know Jeffrey Epstein, alleging that he was Epstein’s principal internal advocate at JPMorgan, maintained an extraordinarily close personal relationship with him and repeatedly supported keeping Epstein as a client despite mounting internal concerns. JPMorgan argued that Staley had access to information about Epstein that he failed to disclose to the bank, while simultaneously using his senior position to reassure colleagues about the relationship. According to the bank, those circumstances supported claims that Staley breached his fiduciary duties, failed to act in JPMorgan’s interests and concealed information that would have been highly relevant to the bank’s decisions about whether to continue doing business with Epstein.

JPMorgan also rejected Staley’s argument that the bank was simply trying to shift responsibility for its own failures onto him. Instead, it maintained that the settlements, litigation costs and reputational damage arising from the Epstein relationship were precisely the kinds of losses for which Staley could potentially be held responsible if the allegations against him were proven. The bank emphasized that its claims rested on Staley’s individual duties as a senior executive and on allegations that his undisclosed personal relationship with Epstein conflicted with those obligations. In practical terms, JPMorgan was telling the court that if Staley knew more about Epstein than he revealed, advocated internally for Epstein while withholding that knowledge and exposed the bank to enormous liability as a result, he should not be allowed to walk away from the litigation at the pleading stage. The filing therefore represented a remarkable reversal in the Epstein story: JPMorgan, which had spent years defending its own relationship with Epstein, was now arguing that one of its most powerful former executives bore significant personal responsibility for keeping Epstein inside the bank.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:





gov.uscourts.nysd.591653.140.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75090790Sun, 13 Sep 2026 22:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJPMorgan Chase’s memorandum of law opposed Jes Staley’s effort to dismiss the bank’s third-party claims against him in the Epstein litigation, arguing that Staley’s own conduct was central to why JPMorgan faced massive legal exposure in the first...JPMorgan Chase’s memorandum of law opposed Jes Staley’s effort to dismiss the bank’s third-party claims against him in the Epstein litigation, arguing that Staley’s own conduct was central to why JPMorgan faced massive legal exposure in the first place. The bank portrayed Staley as far more than an executive who happened to know Jeffrey Epstein, alleging that he was Epstein’s principal internal advocate at JPMorgan, maintained an extraordinarily close personal relationship with him and repeatedly supported keeping Epstein as a client despite mounting internal concerns. JPMorgan argued that Staley had access to information about Epstein that he failed to disclose to the bank, while simultaneously using his senior position to reassure colleagues about the relationship. According to the bank, those circumstances supported claims that Staley breached his fiduciary duties, failed to act in JPMorgan’s interests and concealed information that would have been highly relevant to the bank’s decisions about whether to continue doing business with Epstein.

JPMorgan also rejected Staley’s argument that the bank was simply trying to shift responsibility for its own failures onto him. Instead, it maintained that the settlements, litigation costs and reputational damage arising from the Epstein relationship were precisely the kinds of losses for which Staley could potentially be held responsible if the allegations against him were proven. The bank emphasized that its claims rested on Staley’s individual duties as a senior executive and on allegations that his undisclosed personal relationship with Epstein conflicted with those obligations. In practical terms, JPMorgan was telling the court that if Staley knew more about Epstein than he revealed, advocated internally for Epstein while withholding that knowledge and exposed the bank to enormous liability as a result, he should not be allowed to walk away from the litigation at the pleading stage. The filing therefore represented a remarkable reversal in the Epstein story: JPMorgan, which had spent years defending its own relationship with Epstein, was now arguing that one of its most powerful former executives bore significant personal responsibility for keeping Epstein inside the bank.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:





gov.uscourts.nysd.591653.140.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1049epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/jp-morgan-and-their-unredacted-opposition-to-jes-staley-dismissing-the-lawsuit-part-3-9-13-26--75090792JPMorgan Chase’s memorandum of law opposed Jes Staley’s effort to dismiss the bank’s third-party claims against him in the Epstein litigation, arguing that Staley’s own conduct was central to why JPMorgan faced massive legal exposure in the first place. The bank portrayed Staley as far more than an executive who happened to know Jeffrey Epstein, alleging that he was Epstein’s principal internal advocate at JPMorgan, maintained an extraordinarily close personal relationship with him and repeatedly supported keeping Epstein as a client despite mounting internal concerns. JPMorgan argued that Staley had access to information about Epstein that he failed to disclose to the bank, while simultaneously using his senior position to reassure colleagues about the relationship. According to the bank, those circumstances supported claims that Staley breached his fiduciary duties, failed to act in JPMorgan’s interests and concealed information that would have been highly relevant to the bank’s decisions about whether to continue doing business with Epstein.

JPMorgan also rejected Staley’s argument that the bank was simply trying to shift responsibility for its own failures onto him. Instead, it maintained that the settlements, litigation costs and reputational damage arising from the Epstein relationship were precisely the kinds of losses for which Staley could potentially be held responsible if the allegations against him were proven. The bank emphasized that its claims rested on Staley’s individual duties as a senior executive and on allegations that his undisclosed personal relationship with Epstein conflicted with those obligations. In practical terms, JPMorgan was telling the court that if Staley knew more about Epstein than he revealed, advocated internally for Epstein while withholding that knowledge and exposed the bank to enormous liability as a result, he should not be allowed to walk away from the litigation at the pleading stage. The filing therefore represented a remarkable reversal in the Epstein story: JPMorgan, which had spent years defending its own relationship with Epstein, was now arguing that one of its most powerful former executives bore significant personal responsibility for keeping Epstein inside the bank.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:





gov.uscourts.nysd.591653.140.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75090792Sun, 13 Sep 2026 20:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJPMorgan Chase’s memorandum of law opposed Jes Staley’s effort to dismiss the bank’s third-party claims against him in the Epstein litigation, arguing that Staley’s own conduct was central to why JPMorgan faced massive legal exposure in the first...JPMorgan Chase’s memorandum of law opposed Jes Staley’s effort to dismiss the bank’s third-party claims against him in the Epstein litigation, arguing that Staley’s own conduct was central to why JPMorgan faced massive legal exposure in the first place. The bank portrayed Staley as far more than an executive who happened to know Jeffrey Epstein, alleging that he was Epstein’s principal internal advocate at JPMorgan, maintained an extraordinarily close personal relationship with him and repeatedly supported keeping Epstein as a client despite mounting internal concerns. JPMorgan argued that Staley had access to information about Epstein that he failed to disclose to the bank, while simultaneously using his senior position to reassure colleagues about the relationship. According to the bank, those circumstances supported claims that Staley breached his fiduciary duties, failed to act in JPMorgan’s interests and concealed information that would have been highly relevant to the bank’s decisions about whether to continue doing business with Epstein.

JPMorgan also rejected Staley’s argument that the bank was simply trying to shift responsibility for its own failures onto him. Instead, it maintained that the settlements, litigation costs and reputational damage arising from the Epstein relationship were precisely the kinds of losses for which Staley could potentially be held responsible if the allegations against him were proven. The bank emphasized that its claims rested on Staley’s individual duties as a senior executive and on allegations that his undisclosed personal relationship with Epstein conflicted with those obligations. In practical terms, JPMorgan was telling the court that if Staley knew more about Epstein than he revealed, advocated internally for Epstein while withholding that knowledge and exposed the bank to enormous liability as a result, he should not be allowed to walk away from the litigation at the pleading stage. The filing therefore represented a remarkable reversal in the Epstein story: JPMorgan, which had spent years defending its own relationship with Epstein, was now arguing that one of its most powerful former executives bore significant personal responsibility for keeping Epstein inside the bank.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:





gov.uscourts.nysd.591653.140.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>806epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/jp-morgan-and-their-unredacted-opposition-to-jes-staley-dismissing-the-lawsuit-part-2-9-13-26--75090793JPMorgan Chase’s memorandum of law opposed Jes Staley’s effort to dismiss the bank’s third-party claims against him in the Epstein litigation, arguing that Staley’s own conduct was central to why JPMorgan faced massive legal exposure in the first place. The bank portrayed Staley as far more than an executive who happened to know Jeffrey Epstein, alleging that he was Epstein’s principal internal advocate at JPMorgan, maintained an extraordinarily close personal relationship with him and repeatedly supported keeping Epstein as a client despite mounting internal concerns. JPMorgan argued that Staley had access to information about Epstein that he failed to disclose to the bank, while simultaneously using his senior position to reassure colleagues about the relationship. According to the bank, those circumstances supported claims that Staley breached his fiduciary duties, failed to act in JPMorgan’s interests and concealed information that would have been highly relevant to the bank’s decisions about whether to continue doing business with Epstein.

JPMorgan also rejected Staley’s argument that the bank was simply trying to shift responsibility for its own failures onto him. Instead, it maintained that the settlements, litigation costs and reputational damage arising from the Epstein relationship were precisely the kinds of losses for which Staley could potentially be held responsible if the allegations against him were proven. The bank emphasized that its claims rested on Staley’s individual duties as a senior executive and on allegations that his undisclosed personal relationship with Epstein conflicted with those obligations. In practical terms, JPMorgan was telling the court that if Staley knew more about Epstein than he revealed, advocated internally for Epstein while withholding that knowledge and exposed the bank to enormous liability as a result, he should not be allowed to walk away from the litigation at the pleading stage. The filing therefore represented a remarkable reversal in the Epstein story: JPMorgan, which had spent years defending its own relationship with Epstein, was now arguing that one of its most powerful former executives bore significant personal responsibility for keeping Epstein inside the bank.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:





gov.uscourts.nysd.591653.140.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75090793Sun, 13 Sep 2026 18:30:04 +0000Bobby CapucciJPMorgan Chase’s memorandum of law opposed Jes Staley’s effort to dismiss the bank’s third-party claims against him in the Epstein litigation, arguing that Staley’s own conduct was central to why JPMorgan faced massive legal exposure in the first...JPMorgan Chase’s memorandum of law opposed Jes Staley’s effort to dismiss the bank’s third-party claims against him in the Epstein litigation, arguing that Staley’s own conduct was central to why JPMorgan faced massive legal exposure in the first place. The bank portrayed Staley as far more than an executive who happened to know Jeffrey Epstein, alleging that he was Epstein’s principal internal advocate at JPMorgan, maintained an extraordinarily close personal relationship with him and repeatedly supported keeping Epstein as a client despite mounting internal concerns. JPMorgan argued that Staley had access to information about Epstein that he failed to disclose to the bank, while simultaneously using his senior position to reassure colleagues about the relationship. According to the bank, those circumstances supported claims that Staley breached his fiduciary duties, failed to act in JPMorgan’s interests and concealed information that would have been highly relevant to the bank’s decisions about whether to continue doing business with Epstein.

JPMorgan also rejected Staley’s argument that the bank was simply trying to shift responsibility for its own failures onto him. Instead, it maintained that the settlements, litigation costs and reputational damage arising from the Epstein relationship were precisely the kinds of losses for which Staley could potentially be held responsible if the allegations against him were proven. The bank emphasized that its claims rested on Staley’s individual duties as a senior executive and on allegations that his undisclosed personal relationship with Epstein conflicted with those obligations. In practical terms, JPMorgan was telling the court that if Staley knew more about Epstein than he revealed, advocated internally for Epstein while withholding that knowledge and exposed the bank to enormous liability as a result, he should not be allowed to walk away from the litigation at the pleading stage. The filing therefore represented a remarkable reversal in the Epstein story: JPMorgan, which had spent years defending its own relationship with Epstein, was now arguing that one of its most powerful former executives bore significant personal responsibility for keeping Epstein inside the bank.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:





gov.uscourts.nysd.591653.140.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>750epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/jp-morgan-and-their-unredacted-opposition-to-jes-staley-dismissing-the-lawsuit-part-1-9-13-26--75090791JPMorgan Chase’s memorandum of law opposed Jes Staley’s effort to dismiss the bank’s third-party claims against him in the Epstein litigation, arguing that Staley’s own conduct was central to why JPMorgan faced massive legal exposure in the first place. The bank portrayed Staley as far more than an executive who happened to know Jeffrey Epstein, alleging that he was Epstein’s principal internal advocate at JPMorgan, maintained an extraordinarily close personal relationship with him and repeatedly supported keeping Epstein as a client despite mounting internal concerns. JPMorgan argued that Staley had access to information about Epstein that he failed to disclose to the bank, while simultaneously using his senior position to reassure colleagues about the relationship. According to the bank, those circumstances supported claims that Staley breached his fiduciary duties, failed to act in JPMorgan’s interests and concealed information that would have been highly relevant to the bank’s decisions about whether to continue doing business with Epstein.

JPMorgan also rejected Staley’s argument that the bank was simply trying to shift responsibility for its own failures onto him. Instead, it maintained that the settlements, litigation costs and reputational damage arising from the Epstein relationship were precisely the kinds of losses for which Staley could potentially be held responsible if the allegations against him were proven. The bank emphasized that its claims rested on Staley’s individual duties as a senior executive and on allegations that his undisclosed personal relationship with Epstein conflicted with those obligations. In practical terms, JPMorgan was telling the court that if Staley knew more about Epstein than he revealed, advocated internally for Epstein while withholding that knowledge and exposed the bank to enormous liability as a result, he should not be allowed to walk away from the litigation at the pleading stage. The filing therefore represented a remarkable reversal in the Epstein story: JPMorgan, which had spent years defending its own relationship with Epstein, was now arguing that one of its most powerful former executives bore significant personal responsibility for keeping Epstein inside the bank.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:





gov.uscourts.nysd.591653.140.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75090791Sun, 13 Sep 2026 16:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJPMorgan Chase’s memorandum of law opposed Jes Staley’s effort to dismiss the bank’s third-party claims against him in the Epstein litigation, arguing that Staley’s own conduct was central to why JPMorgan faced massive legal exposure in the first...JPMorgan Chase’s memorandum of law opposed Jes Staley’s effort to dismiss the bank’s third-party claims against him in the Epstein litigation, arguing that Staley’s own conduct was central to why JPMorgan faced massive legal exposure in the first place. The bank portrayed Staley as far more than an executive who happened to know Jeffrey Epstein, alleging that he was Epstein’s principal internal advocate at JPMorgan, maintained an extraordinarily close personal relationship with him and repeatedly supported keeping Epstein as a client despite mounting internal concerns. JPMorgan argued that Staley had access to information about Epstein that he failed to disclose to the bank, while simultaneously using his senior position to reassure colleagues about the relationship. According to the bank, those circumstances supported claims that Staley breached his fiduciary duties, failed to act in JPMorgan’s interests and concealed information that would have been highly relevant to the bank’s decisions about whether to continue doing business with Epstein.

JPMorgan also rejected Staley’s argument that the bank was simply trying to shift responsibility for its own failures onto him. Instead, it maintained that the settlements, litigation costs and reputational damage arising from the Epstein relationship were precisely the kinds of losses for which Staley could potentially be held responsible if the allegations against him were proven. The bank emphasized that its claims rested on Staley’s individual duties as a senior executive and on allegations that his undisclosed personal relationship with Epstein conflicted with those obligations. In practical terms, JPMorgan was telling the court that if Staley knew more about Epstein than he revealed, advocated internally for Epstein while withholding that knowledge and exposed the bank to enormous liability as a result, he should not be allowed to walk away from the litigation at the pleading stage. The filing therefore represented a remarkable reversal in the Epstein story: JPMorgan, which had spent years defending its own relationship with Epstein, was now arguing that one of its most powerful former executives bore significant personal responsibility for keeping Epstein inside the bank.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:





gov.uscourts.nysd.591653.140.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>785epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-a-trip-around-the-headlines-in-moscow-in-the-early-stages-of-the-case-9-13-26--75071300In this episode, we take a trip back through the headlines coming out of Moscow on December 5 and 6, 2022, when the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin were still unsolved and investigators were working through an enormous number of tips, interviews and pieces of evidence. At that point, police were still trying to determine whether the victims had been specifically targeted, whether one person or the house itself had been the focus, and how the killer had entered and escaped without being caught. Public attention was intensifying around the surviving roommates, the victims’ final movements, the missing murder weapon and the increasingly frantic search for surveillance footage and witnesses. Rumors were spreading just as quickly as verified information, forcing Moscow police to repeatedly push back against online speculation while families became more vocal about the lack of answers.

We then jump ahead to January 6, 2023, when the entire complexion of the case had changed following Bryan Kohberger’s arrest and the release of the probable-cause affidavit. Instead of a mystery with no publicly identified suspect, the headlines were suddenly focused on the white Hyundai Elantra, cellphone records, surveillance footage, Dylan Mortensen’s description of a masked man and the knife sheath recovered beside Madison Mogen that investigators said carried Kohberger’s DNA. The contrast between early December and early January showed just how quickly the investigation had evolved behind the scenes. What had looked from the outside like weeks of uncertainty had actually been a rapidly developing case, and by January the public was finally seeing the evidence investigators said had led them from an unidentified white sedan to a criminology doctoral student living just across the state line in Pullman.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75071300Sun, 13 Sep 2026 14:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn this episode, we take a trip back through the headlines coming out of Moscow on December 5 and 6, 2022, when the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin were still unsolved and investigators were working through...In this episode, we take a trip back through the headlines coming out of Moscow on December 5 and 6, 2022, when the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin were still unsolved and investigators were working through an enormous number of tips, interviews and pieces of evidence. At that point, police were still trying to determine whether the victims had been specifically targeted, whether one person or the house itself had been the focus, and how the killer had entered and escaped without being caught. Public attention was intensifying around the surviving roommates, the victims’ final movements, the missing murder weapon and the increasingly frantic search for surveillance footage and witnesses. Rumors were spreading just as quickly as verified information, forcing Moscow police to repeatedly push back against online speculation while families became more vocal about the lack of answers.

We then jump ahead to January 6, 2023, when the entire complexion of the case had changed following Bryan Kohberger’s arrest and the release of the probable-cause affidavit. Instead of a mystery with no publicly identified suspect, the headlines were suddenly focused on the white Hyundai Elantra, cellphone records, surveillance footage, Dylan Mortensen’s description of a masked man and the knife sheath recovered beside Madison Mogen that investigators said carried Kohberger’s DNA. The contrast between early December and early January showed just how quickly the investigation had evolved behind the scenes. What had looked from the outside like weeks of uncertainty had actually been a rapidly developing case, and by January the public was finally seeing the evidence investigators said had led them from an unidentified white sedan to a criminology doctoral student living just across the state line in Pullman.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2485bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-ethan-chapin-and-the-meta-apple-and-american-express-warrants-9-13-26--75071298The Apple and Meta warrants showed investigators trying to reconstruct Ethan Chapin’s digital life in the months leading up to the murders and to determine whether anything in his accounts could help explain his movements, contacts or relationships. Police sought Chapin’s iCloud records from August 1 through November 18, 2022, including account-identifying information and other stored data tied to his Apple account. The Meta warrant similarly targeted Chapin’s Facebook account from August 1 through November 19 and sought subscriber information, login data, contact information, payment information and other account records. Investigators were doing the same thing with the other victims, effectively building a digital map of who they had been communicating with, where their accounts were being accessed and whether anything in their online activity could point toward a motive, prior contact or suspicious person.


The American Express warrant was part of the parallel financial investigation into Chapin and the other victims. Police sought transaction records from American Express and several other banks and credit-card companies as they examined purchases, locations and spending activity that might help reconstruct the victims’ movements or identify people and businesses connected to them before the murders. Importantly, the warrants did not mean investigators suspected Chapin of wrongdoing; they were using every available digital and financial source to build a complete timeline and rule possibilities in or out. Taken together, the Apple, Meta and American Express warrants showed how broad the Moscow investigation had become almost immediately: detectives were not just processing the house, they were digging into the victims’ phones, social-media accounts and financial histories to understand exactly what they had been doing and who they had been interacting with before November 13, 2022


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75071298Sun, 13 Sep 2026 12:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe Apple and Meta warrants showed investigators trying to reconstruct Ethan Chapin’s digital life in the months leading up to the murders and to determine whether anything in his accounts could help explain his movements, contacts or relationships....The Apple and Meta warrants showed investigators trying to reconstruct Ethan Chapin’s digital life in the months leading up to the murders and to determine whether anything in his accounts could help explain his movements, contacts or relationships. Police sought Chapin’s iCloud records from August 1 through November 18, 2022, including account-identifying information and other stored data tied to his Apple account. The Meta warrant similarly targeted Chapin’s Facebook account from August 1 through November 19 and sought subscriber information, login data, contact information, payment information and other account records. Investigators were doing the same thing with the other victims, effectively building a digital map of who they had been communicating with, where their accounts were being accessed and whether anything in their online activity could point toward a motive, prior contact or suspicious person.


The American Express warrant was part of the parallel financial investigation into Chapin and the other victims. Police sought transaction records from American Express and several other banks and credit-card companies as they examined purchases, locations and spending activity that might help reconstruct the victims’ movements or identify people and businesses connected to them before the murders. Importantly, the warrants did not mean investigators suspected Chapin of wrongdoing; they were using every available digital and financial source to build a complete timeline and rule possibilities in or out. Taken together, the Apple, Meta and American Express warrants showed how broad the Moscow investigation had become almost immediately: detectives were not just processing the house, they were digging into the victims’ phones, social-media accounts and financial histories to understand exactly what they had been doing and who they had been interacting with before November 13, 2022


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3461bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-lori-vallow-and-those-who-knew-her-best-9-13-26--75071556
True-crime author John Glatt, who wrote The Doomsday Mother, viewed the case as one of the most disturbing he had ever covered. Glatt said that after writing roughly two dozen true-crime books, little compared with the brutality of what happened to Tylee and JJ and the deaths surrounding Lori and Chad. He was particularly struck by Lori’s behavior immediately after Charles Vallow was shot by her brother Alex Cox, pointing to body-camera footage in which Lori appeared relaxed enough to joke with police less than an hour after her husband had been killed. Glatt also emphasized the importance of Chad’s elaborate “light” and “dark” belief system and the way those ideas became intertwined with Lori’s worldview. Taken together, the Colby call, Gibb’s account and Glatt’s assessment painted a remarkably consistent picture: Lori did not simply become caught up in bizarre religious ideas, but repeatedly lied, manipulated people around her and continued constructing alternative explanations even after overwhelming evidence established what happened to her children.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75071556Sun, 13 Sep 2026 10:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe phone call between Lori Vallow Daybell and her surviving son Colby Ryan showed just how far removed Lori remained from the established evidence surrounding the deaths of Tylee Ryan and JJ Vallow. During the jailhouse conversation, Colby finally...
True-crime author John Glatt, who wrote The Doomsday Mother, viewed the case as one of the most disturbing he had ever covered. Glatt said that after writing roughly two dozen true-crime books, little compared with the brutality of what happened to Tylee and JJ and the deaths surrounding Lori and Chad. He was particularly struck by Lori’s behavior immediately after Charles Vallow was shot by her brother Alex Cox, pointing to body-camera footage in which Lori appeared relaxed enough to joke with police less than an hour after her husband had been killed. Glatt also emphasized the importance of Chad’s elaborate “light” and “dark” belief system and the way those ideas became intertwined with Lori’s worldview. Taken together, the Colby call, Gibb’s account and Glatt’s assessment painted a remarkably consistent picture: Lori did not simply become caught up in bizarre religious ideas, but repeatedly lied, manipulated people around her and continued constructing alternative explanations even after overwhelming evidence established what happened to her children.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3066chaddaybell,charlesvallow,daybell,daybellcult,doomsdaymom,idahosupremecourt,jjvallow,justicefortyleeandjj,loridaybell,lorivallow,lorivallowappeal,lorivallowdaybell,lorivallowtrial,mormoncult,mormontruecrime,tammydaybell,truecrime,truecrimecommunity,truecrimepodcast,tyleeryantruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-ghislaine-maxwell-and-her-interest-in-the-flight-patterns-in-new-hampshire-9-13-26--75090414
In hindsight, the flight-pattern question fit neatly with the broader picture prosecutors later painted of Maxwell deliberately trying to avoid detection. After Epstein’s 2019 arrest and death, Maxwell largely disappeared from public view, changed phone and email information, used intermediaries and shell entities, and settled into a remote property surrounded by woods and privacy. Federal prosecutors later emphasized those efforts when arguing that she posed a serious flight risk, and the FBI ultimately arrested her at the Bradford estate in July 2020. The fact that she had specifically asked about aircraft flying over the house did not prove she expected FBI surveillance, but it became one of the more striking details of her life in hiding because it suggested she was thinking carefully about how visible the property was not just from the road, but from the sky.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75090414Sun, 13 Sep 2026 08:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBefore Ghislaine Maxwell purchased the secluded New Hampshire estate where she would later be arrested, she reportedly asked the real-estate broker an unusually specific question: what were the flight patterns over the property? The broker later...
In hindsight, the flight-pattern question fit neatly with the broader picture prosecutors later painted of Maxwell deliberately trying to avoid detection. After Epstein’s 2019 arrest and death, Maxwell largely disappeared from public view, changed phone and email information, used intermediaries and shell entities, and settled into a remote property surrounded by woods and privacy. Federal prosecutors later emphasized those efforts when arguing that she posed a serious flight risk, and the FBI ultimately arrested her at the Bradford estate in July 2020. The fact that she had specifically asked about aircraft flying over the house did not prove she expected FBI surveillance, but it became one of the more striking details of her life in hiding because it suggested she was thinking carefully about how visible the property was not just from the road, but from the sky.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2915epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-deutsche-bank-and-the-non-existent-epstein-related-compliance-9-12-26--75071493
The SAR problem was part of that larger breakdown. Deutsche Bank’s transaction-monitoring system and employees repeatedly failed to identify, escalate and adequately investigate transactions that should have raised obvious suspicions given Epstein’s history. Regulators found that very few problematic transactions were questioned at all, and even when employees did ask questions, transactions were frequently cleared without satisfactory explanations. The significance was not that every payment was proven to be criminal, but that federal anti-money-laundering rules required a bank to investigate suspicious activity and file Suspicious Activity Reports when appropriate, particularly for a client already designated high risk. Deutsche Bank instead allowed years of cash withdrawals and payments to women and Epstein associates to move through its accounts without the scrutiny the situation demanded. The bank eventually filed SARs and terminated Epstein in 2018, but by then it had serviced him for roughly five years. The regulator’s conclusion was devastatingly simple: Deutsche Bank knew Epstein’s criminal history, knew what types of transactions should have concerned it, created internal safeguards supposedly designed to catch them, and then repeatedly failed to follow its own procedures when those very transactions appeared.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75071493Sun, 13 Sep 2026 06:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDeutsche Bank’s handling of Jeffrey Epstein was riddled with compliance failures even though the bank knew exactly how risky he was. Epstein became a Deutsche Bank client in 2013 after JPMorgan finally cut him loose, and the bank classified him as...
The SAR problem was part of that larger breakdown. Deutsche Bank’s transaction-monitoring system and employees repeatedly failed to identify, escalate and adequately investigate transactions that should have raised obvious suspicions given Epstein’s history. Regulators found that very few problematic transactions were questioned at all, and even when employees did ask questions, transactions were frequently cleared without satisfactory explanations. The significance was not that every payment was proven to be criminal, but that federal anti-money-laundering rules required a bank to investigate suspicious activity and file Suspicious Activity Reports when appropriate, particularly for a client already designated high risk. Deutsche Bank instead allowed years of cash withdrawals and payments to women and Epstein associates to move through its accounts without the scrutiny the situation demanded. The bank eventually filed SARs and terminated Epstein in 2018, but by then it had serviced him for roughly five years. The regulator’s conclusion was devastatingly simple: Deutsche Bank knew Epstein’s criminal history, knew what types of transactions should have concerned it, created internal safeguards supposedly designed to catch them, and then repeatedly failed to follow its own procedures when those very transactions appeared.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3631epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-dna-expert-cece-moore-discusses-the-igg-process--75088958

Moore highlighted that the effectiveness of IGG depends on public participation and the willingness of individuals to share their genetic information. She cautioned that misuse or perceived overreach in employing IGG could lead to public backlash, potentially limiting its future utility in solving crimes. Therefore, maintaining ethical guidelines is crucial to preserve the public's trust and the viability of IGG as a law enforcement tool.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Bryan Kohberger case: FBI’s DNA tactics legal, but they raise another concern | Fox News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75088958Sun, 13 Sep 2026 04:30:02 +0000Bobby Capucci​Investigative genetic genealogist CeCe Moore has commented on the FBI's use of Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG) in the Bryan Kohberger case, emphasizing the importance of ethical practices to maintain public support for this investigative tool....

Moore highlighted that the effectiveness of IGG depends on public participation and the willingness of individuals to share their genetic information. She cautioned that misuse or perceived overreach in employing IGG could lead to public backlash, potentially limiting its future utility in solving crimes. Therefore, maintaining ethical guidelines is crucial to preserve the public's trust and the viability of IGG as a law enforcement tool.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Bryan Kohberger case: FBI’s DNA tactics legal, but they raise another concern | Fox News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>752bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-bryan-kohberger-and-the-weird-and-wild-theories-surrounding-the-murders--75088957In the weeks after Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin were murdered, the Idaho case developed an enormous and often disturbing online ecosystem filled with amateur detectives, Reddit threads, Facebook groups and conspiracy theories. Thousands of people tried to solve the case from afar, producing theories about drug deals, fraternity disputes, revenge, bullying and secret relationships, while large social-media communities dissected every photograph, video and rumor connected to Moscow. Some users genuinely tried to help and forwarded possible tips to police, but the volume of speculation also created serious problems. Innocent people, including the man seen with Kaylee and Madison at the food truck and Kaylee’s former boyfriend, were publicly accused of involvement despite being cleared by investigators, while friends and relatives of the victims faced harassment and even threats. Police repeatedly had to knock down false claims and maintain lists of people they had already ruled out because online speculation kept dragging them back into the case.

The irony was that while the internet had generated an almost endless list of suspects and theories, Bryan Kohberger had largely escaped the attention of the online sleuth community before his arrest. Once he was taken into custody, the speculation simply shifted toward him and anyone connected to the case. Users began trying to identify anonymous Reddit accounts as Kohberger, falsely claimed he had appeared at a victims’ vigil, and increasingly targeted surviving roommate Dylan Mortensen with accusations despite police saying they believed Kohberger had acted alone. The article argued that internet sleuthing could occasionally help amplify cases or surface useful information, but the Moscow murders demonstrated its darker side: rumor could spread faster than verified evidence, innocent people could be publicly convicted without proof, and a real homicide investigation could become entangled with a parallel online world where speculation was treated as fact long before investigators had finished their work.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75088957Sun, 13 Sep 2026 02:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn the weeks after Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin were murdered, the Idaho case developed an enormous and often disturbing online ecosystem filled with amateur detectives, Reddit threads, Facebook groups and conspiracy...In the weeks after Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin were murdered, the Idaho case developed an enormous and often disturbing online ecosystem filled with amateur detectives, Reddit threads, Facebook groups and conspiracy theories. Thousands of people tried to solve the case from afar, producing theories about drug deals, fraternity disputes, revenge, bullying and secret relationships, while large social-media communities dissected every photograph, video and rumor connected to Moscow. Some users genuinely tried to help and forwarded possible tips to police, but the volume of speculation also created serious problems. Innocent people, including the man seen with Kaylee and Madison at the food truck and Kaylee’s former boyfriend, were publicly accused of involvement despite being cleared by investigators, while friends and relatives of the victims faced harassment and even threats. Police repeatedly had to knock down false claims and maintain lists of people they had already ruled out because online speculation kept dragging them back into the case.

The irony was that while the internet had generated an almost endless list of suspects and theories, Bryan Kohberger had largely escaped the attention of the online sleuth community before his arrest. Once he was taken into custody, the speculation simply shifted toward him and anyone connected to the case. Users began trying to identify anonymous Reddit accounts as Kohberger, falsely claimed he had appeared at a victims’ vigil, and increasingly targeted surviving roommate Dylan Mortensen with accusations despite police saying they believed Kohberger had acted alone. The article argued that internet sleuthing could occasionally help amplify cases or surface useful information, but the Moscow murders demonstrated its darker side: rumor could spread faster than verified evidence, innocent people could be publicly convicted without proof, and a real homicide investigation could become entangled with a parallel online world where speculation was treated as fact long before investigators had finished their work.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>899bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcripts-day-1-part-14-9-12-26--75088871
The defense spent much of the first day attacking the manner in which the prosecution was getting its evidence into the record rather than attempting to disprove the entire prosecution theory at that stage. Kathryn Nester and Robinson’s attorneys repeatedly raised hearsay, foundation and authentication objections, arguing that investigators were being permitted to introduce reports, statements and records created by other people without those individuals appearing personally to testify. Judge Graf overruled most of those objections, reflecting the substantially lower evidentiary threshold governing a Utah preliminary hearing, whose purpose was only to determine whether probable cause existed to send Robinson to trial rather than whether prosecutors could prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. One significant exception involved an edited compilation of surveillance footage, which Graf declined to admit in that form and required prosecutors to replace with the underlying unedited material. Hull’s testimony also revealed the scope of the prosecution’s surveillance theory: investigators claimed Robinson had appeared on or around the UVU campus multiple times on September 10 and that they were attempting to stitch those appearances together into a continuous identification of the alleged shooter. By the end of day one, prosecutors had established the killing itself, the medical cause of Kirk’s death, the existence and authenticity of substantial video evidence and the beginnings of their effort to identify Robinson as the person captured in that footage. They had not yet presented many of the pieces expected to become more consequential later in the hearing, including the rifle and DNA evidence, Robinson’s alleged communications and admissions, and testimony concerning his roommate Lance Twiggs.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75088871Sun, 13 Sep 2026 00:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay one of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing on July 6, 2026, largely centered on prosecutors beginning to construct a timeline of Charlie Kirk’s killing at Utah Valley University and establishing the authenticity of the surveillance footage and...
The defense spent much of the first day attacking the manner in which the prosecution was getting its evidence into the record rather than attempting to disprove the entire prosecution theory at that stage. Kathryn Nester and Robinson’s attorneys repeatedly raised hearsay, foundation and authentication objections, arguing that investigators were being permitted to introduce reports, statements and records created by other people without those individuals appearing personally to testify. Judge Graf overruled most of those objections, reflecting the substantially lower evidentiary threshold governing a Utah preliminary hearing, whose purpose was only to determine whether probable cause existed to send Robinson to trial rather than whether prosecutors could prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. One significant exception involved an edited compilation of surveillance footage, which Graf declined to admit in that form and required prosecutors to replace with the underlying unedited material. Hull’s testimony also revealed the scope of the prosecution’s surveillance theory: investigators claimed Robinson had appeared on or around the UVU campus multiple times on September 10 and that they were attempting to stitch those appearances together into a continuous identification of the alleged shooter. By the end of day one, prosecutors had established the killing itself, the medical cause of Kirk’s death, the existence and authenticity of substantial video evidence and the beginnings of their effort to identify Robinson as the person captured in that footage. They had not yet presented many of the pieces expected to become more consequential later in the hearing, including the rifle and DNA evidence, Robinson’s alleged communications and admissions, and testimony concerning his roommate Lance Twiggs.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1017breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-usvi-and-their-motion-in-opposition-to-jp-morgan-s-request-for-dismissal-part-4-9-12-26--75088872JPMorgan Chase’s memorandum of law opposed Jes Staley’s effort to dismiss the bank’s third-party claims against him in the Epstein litigation, arguing that Staley’s own conduct was central to why JPMorgan faced massive legal exposure in the first place. The bank portrayed Staley as far more than an executive who happened to know Jeffrey Epstein, alleging that he was Epstein’s principal internal advocate at JPMorgan, maintained an extraordinarily close personal relationship with him and repeatedly supported keeping Epstein as a client despite mounting internal concerns. JPMorgan argued that Staley had access to information about Epstein that he failed to disclose to the bank, while simultaneously using his senior position to reassure colleagues about the relationship. According to the bank, those circumstances supported claims that Staley breached his fiduciary duties, failed to act in JPMorgan’s interests and concealed information that would have been highly relevant to the bank’s decisions about whether to continue doing business with Epstein.

JPMorgan also rejected Staley’s argument that the bank was simply trying to shift responsibility for its own failures onto him. Instead, it maintained that the settlements, litigation costs and reputational damage arising from the Epstein relationship were precisely the kinds of losses for which Staley could potentially be held responsible if the allegations against him were proven. The bank emphasized that its claims rested on Staley’s individual duties as a senior executive and on allegations that his undisclosed personal relationship with Epstein conflicted with those obligations. In practical terms, JPMorgan was telling the court that if Staley knew more about Epstein than he revealed, advocated internally for Epstein while withholding that knowledge and exposed the bank to enormous liability as a result, he should not be allowed to walk away from the litigation at the pleading stage. The filing therefore represented a remarkable reversal in the Epstein story: JPMorgan, which had spent years defending its own relationship with Epstein, was now arguing that one of its most powerful former executives bore significant personal responsibility for keeping Epstein inside the bank.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:





gov.uscourts.nysd.591653.140.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75088872Sat, 12 Sep 2026 22:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJPMorgan Chase’s memorandum of law opposed Jes Staley’s effort to dismiss the bank’s third-party claims against him in the Epstein litigation, arguing that Staley’s own conduct was central to why JPMorgan faced massive legal exposure in the first...JPMorgan Chase’s memorandum of law opposed Jes Staley’s effort to dismiss the bank’s third-party claims against him in the Epstein litigation, arguing that Staley’s own conduct was central to why JPMorgan faced massive legal exposure in the first place. The bank portrayed Staley as far more than an executive who happened to know Jeffrey Epstein, alleging that he was Epstein’s principal internal advocate at JPMorgan, maintained an extraordinarily close personal relationship with him and repeatedly supported keeping Epstein as a client despite mounting internal concerns. JPMorgan argued that Staley had access to information about Epstein that he failed to disclose to the bank, while simultaneously using his senior position to reassure colleagues about the relationship. According to the bank, those circumstances supported claims that Staley breached his fiduciary duties, failed to act in JPMorgan’s interests and concealed information that would have been highly relevant to the bank’s decisions about whether to continue doing business with Epstein.

JPMorgan also rejected Staley’s argument that the bank was simply trying to shift responsibility for its own failures onto him. Instead, it maintained that the settlements, litigation costs and reputational damage arising from the Epstein relationship were precisely the kinds of losses for which Staley could potentially be held responsible if the allegations against him were proven. The bank emphasized that its claims rested on Staley’s individual duties as a senior executive and on allegations that his undisclosed personal relationship with Epstein conflicted with those obligations. In practical terms, JPMorgan was telling the court that if Staley knew more about Epstein than he revealed, advocated internally for Epstein while withholding that knowledge and exposed the bank to enormous liability as a result, he should not be allowed to walk away from the litigation at the pleading stage. The filing therefore represented a remarkable reversal in the Epstein story: JPMorgan, which had spent years defending its own relationship with Epstein, was now arguing that one of its most powerful former executives bore significant personal responsibility for keeping Epstein inside the bank.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:





gov.uscourts.nysd.591653.140.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>809epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-usvi-and-their-motion-in-opposition-to-jp-morgan-s-request-for-dismissal-part-3-9-12-26--75088874JPMorgan Chase’s memorandum of law opposed Jes Staley’s effort to dismiss the bank’s third-party claims against him in the Epstein litigation, arguing that Staley’s own conduct was central to why JPMorgan faced massive legal exposure in the first place. The bank portrayed Staley as far more than an executive who happened to know Jeffrey Epstein, alleging that he was Epstein’s principal internal advocate at JPMorgan, maintained an extraordinarily close personal relationship with him and repeatedly supported keeping Epstein as a client despite mounting internal concerns. JPMorgan argued that Staley had access to information about Epstein that he failed to disclose to the bank, while simultaneously using his senior position to reassure colleagues about the relationship. According to the bank, those circumstances supported claims that Staley breached his fiduciary duties, failed to act in JPMorgan’s interests and concealed information that would have been highly relevant to the bank’s decisions about whether to continue doing business with Epstein.

JPMorgan also rejected Staley’s argument that the bank was simply trying to shift responsibility for its own failures onto him. Instead, it maintained that the settlements, litigation costs and reputational damage arising from the Epstein relationship were precisely the kinds of losses for which Staley could potentially be held responsible if the allegations against him were proven. The bank emphasized that its claims rested on Staley’s individual duties as a senior executive and on allegations that his undisclosed personal relationship with Epstein conflicted with those obligations. In practical terms, JPMorgan was telling the court that if Staley knew more about Epstein than he revealed, advocated internally for Epstein while withholding that knowledge and exposed the bank to enormous liability as a result, he should not be allowed to walk away from the litigation at the pleading stage. The filing therefore represented a remarkable reversal in the Epstein story: JPMorgan, which had spent years defending its own relationship with Epstein, was now arguing that one of its most powerful former executives bore significant personal responsibility for keeping Epstein inside the bank.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:





gov.uscourts.nysd.591653.140.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75088874Sat, 12 Sep 2026 20:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJPMorgan Chase’s memorandum of law opposed Jes Staley’s effort to dismiss the bank’s third-party claims against him in the Epstein litigation, arguing that Staley’s own conduct was central to why JPMorgan faced massive legal exposure in the first...JPMorgan Chase’s memorandum of law opposed Jes Staley’s effort to dismiss the bank’s third-party claims against him in the Epstein litigation, arguing that Staley’s own conduct was central to why JPMorgan faced massive legal exposure in the first place. The bank portrayed Staley as far more than an executive who happened to know Jeffrey Epstein, alleging that he was Epstein’s principal internal advocate at JPMorgan, maintained an extraordinarily close personal relationship with him and repeatedly supported keeping Epstein as a client despite mounting internal concerns. JPMorgan argued that Staley had access to information about Epstein that he failed to disclose to the bank, while simultaneously using his senior position to reassure colleagues about the relationship. According to the bank, those circumstances supported claims that Staley breached his fiduciary duties, failed to act in JPMorgan’s interests and concealed information that would have been highly relevant to the bank’s decisions about whether to continue doing business with Epstein.

JPMorgan also rejected Staley’s argument that the bank was simply trying to shift responsibility for its own failures onto him. Instead, it maintained that the settlements, litigation costs and reputational damage arising from the Epstein relationship were precisely the kinds of losses for which Staley could potentially be held responsible if the allegations against him were proven. The bank emphasized that its claims rested on Staley’s individual duties as a senior executive and on allegations that his undisclosed personal relationship with Epstein conflicted with those obligations. In practical terms, JPMorgan was telling the court that if Staley knew more about Epstein than he revealed, advocated internally for Epstein while withholding that knowledge and exposed the bank to enormous liability as a result, he should not be allowed to walk away from the litigation at the pleading stage. The filing therefore represented a remarkable reversal in the Epstein story: JPMorgan, which had spent years defending its own relationship with Epstein, was now arguing that one of its most powerful former executives bore significant personal responsibility for keeping Epstein inside the bank.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:





gov.uscourts.nysd.591653.140.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>702epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-usvi-and-their-motion-in-opposition-to-jp-morgan-s-request-for-dismissal-part-2-9-12-26--75088876JPMorgan Chase’s memorandum of law opposed Jes Staley’s effort to dismiss the bank’s third-party claims against him in the Epstein litigation, arguing that Staley’s own conduct was central to why JPMorgan faced massive legal exposure in the first place. The bank portrayed Staley as far more than an executive who happened to know Jeffrey Epstein, alleging that he was Epstein’s principal internal advocate at JPMorgan, maintained an extraordinarily close personal relationship with him and repeatedly supported keeping Epstein as a client despite mounting internal concerns. JPMorgan argued that Staley had access to information about Epstein that he failed to disclose to the bank, while simultaneously using his senior position to reassure colleagues about the relationship. According to the bank, those circumstances supported claims that Staley breached his fiduciary duties, failed to act in JPMorgan’s interests and concealed information that would have been highly relevant to the bank’s decisions about whether to continue doing business with Epstein.

JPMorgan also rejected Staley’s argument that the bank was simply trying to shift responsibility for its own failures onto him. Instead, it maintained that the settlements, litigation costs and reputational damage arising from the Epstein relationship were precisely the kinds of losses for which Staley could potentially be held responsible if the allegations against him were proven. The bank emphasized that its claims rested on Staley’s individual duties as a senior executive and on allegations that his undisclosed personal relationship with Epstein conflicted with those obligations. In practical terms, JPMorgan was telling the court that if Staley knew more about Epstein than he revealed, advocated internally for Epstein while withholding that knowledge and exposed the bank to enormous liability as a result, he should not be allowed to walk away from the litigation at the pleading stage. The filing therefore represented a remarkable reversal in the Epstein story: JPMorgan, which had spent years defending its own relationship with Epstein, was now arguing that one of its most powerful former executives bore significant personal responsibility for keeping Epstein inside the bank.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:





gov.uscourts.nysd.591653.140.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75088876Sat, 12 Sep 2026 18:30:06 +0000Bobby CapucciJPMorgan Chase’s memorandum of law opposed Jes Staley’s effort to dismiss the bank’s third-party claims against him in the Epstein litigation, arguing that Staley’s own conduct was central to why JPMorgan faced massive legal exposure in the first...JPMorgan Chase’s memorandum of law opposed Jes Staley’s effort to dismiss the bank’s third-party claims against him in the Epstein litigation, arguing that Staley’s own conduct was central to why JPMorgan faced massive legal exposure in the first place. The bank portrayed Staley as far more than an executive who happened to know Jeffrey Epstein, alleging that he was Epstein’s principal internal advocate at JPMorgan, maintained an extraordinarily close personal relationship with him and repeatedly supported keeping Epstein as a client despite mounting internal concerns. JPMorgan argued that Staley had access to information about Epstein that he failed to disclose to the bank, while simultaneously using his senior position to reassure colleagues about the relationship. According to the bank, those circumstances supported claims that Staley breached his fiduciary duties, failed to act in JPMorgan’s interests and concealed information that would have been highly relevant to the bank’s decisions about whether to continue doing business with Epstein.

JPMorgan also rejected Staley’s argument that the bank was simply trying to shift responsibility for its own failures onto him. Instead, it maintained that the settlements, litigation costs and reputational damage arising from the Epstein relationship were precisely the kinds of losses for which Staley could potentially be held responsible if the allegations against him were proven. The bank emphasized that its claims rested on Staley’s individual duties as a senior executive and on allegations that his undisclosed personal relationship with Epstein conflicted with those obligations. In practical terms, JPMorgan was telling the court that if Staley knew more about Epstein than he revealed, advocated internally for Epstein while withholding that knowledge and exposed the bank to enormous liability as a result, he should not be allowed to walk away from the litigation at the pleading stage. The filing therefore represented a remarkable reversal in the Epstein story: JPMorgan, which had spent years defending its own relationship with Epstein, was now arguing that one of its most powerful former executives bore significant personal responsibility for keeping Epstein inside the bank.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:





gov.uscourts.nysd.591653.140.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>691epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-usvi-and-their-motion-in-opposition-to-jp-morgan-s-request-for-dismissal-part-1-9-12-26--75088875JPMorgan Chase’s memorandum of law opposed Jes Staley’s effort to dismiss the bank’s third-party claims against him in the Epstein litigation, arguing that Staley’s own conduct was central to why JPMorgan faced massive legal exposure in the first place. The bank portrayed Staley as far more than an executive who happened to know Jeffrey Epstein, alleging that he was Epstein’s principal internal advocate at JPMorgan, maintained an extraordinarily close personal relationship with him and repeatedly supported keeping Epstein as a client despite mounting internal concerns. JPMorgan argued that Staley had access to information about Epstein that he failed to disclose to the bank, while simultaneously using his senior position to reassure colleagues about the relationship. According to the bank, those circumstances supported claims that Staley breached his fiduciary duties, failed to act in JPMorgan’s interests and concealed information that would have been highly relevant to the bank’s decisions about whether to continue doing business with Epstein.

JPMorgan also rejected Staley’s argument that the bank was simply trying to shift responsibility for its own failures onto him. Instead, it maintained that the settlements, litigation costs and reputational damage arising from the Epstein relationship were precisely the kinds of losses for which Staley could potentially be held responsible if the allegations against him were proven. The bank emphasized that its claims rested on Staley’s individual duties as a senior executive and on allegations that his undisclosed personal relationship with Epstein conflicted with those obligations. In practical terms, JPMorgan was telling the court that if Staley knew more about Epstein than he revealed, advocated internally for Epstein while withholding that knowledge and exposed the bank to enormous liability as a result, he should not be allowed to walk away from the litigation at the pleading stage. The filing therefore represented a remarkable reversal in the Epstein story: JPMorgan, which had spent years defending its own relationship with Epstein, was now arguing that one of its most powerful former executives bore significant personal responsibility for keeping Epstein inside the bank.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:





gov.uscourts.nysd.591653.140.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75088875Sat, 12 Sep 2026 16:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJPMorgan Chase’s memorandum of law opposed Jes Staley’s effort to dismiss the bank’s third-party claims against him in the Epstein litigation, arguing that Staley’s own conduct was central to why JPMorgan faced massive legal exposure in the first...JPMorgan Chase’s memorandum of law opposed Jes Staley’s effort to dismiss the bank’s third-party claims against him in the Epstein litigation, arguing that Staley’s own conduct was central to why JPMorgan faced massive legal exposure in the first place. The bank portrayed Staley as far more than an executive who happened to know Jeffrey Epstein, alleging that he was Epstein’s principal internal advocate at JPMorgan, maintained an extraordinarily close personal relationship with him and repeatedly supported keeping Epstein as a client despite mounting internal concerns. JPMorgan argued that Staley had access to information about Epstein that he failed to disclose to the bank, while simultaneously using his senior position to reassure colleagues about the relationship. According to the bank, those circumstances supported claims that Staley breached his fiduciary duties, failed to act in JPMorgan’s interests and concealed information that would have been highly relevant to the bank’s decisions about whether to continue doing business with Epstein.

JPMorgan also rejected Staley’s argument that the bank was simply trying to shift responsibility for its own failures onto him. Instead, it maintained that the settlements, litigation costs and reputational damage arising from the Epstein relationship were precisely the kinds of losses for which Staley could potentially be held responsible if the allegations against him were proven. The bank emphasized that its claims rested on Staley’s individual duties as a senior executive and on allegations that his undisclosed personal relationship with Epstein conflicted with those obligations. In practical terms, JPMorgan was telling the court that if Staley knew more about Epstein than he revealed, advocated internally for Epstein while withholding that knowledge and exposed the bank to enormous liability as a result, he should not be allowed to walk away from the litigation at the pleading stage. The filing therefore represented a remarkable reversal in the Epstein story: JPMorgan, which had spent years defending its own relationship with Epstein, was now arguing that one of its most powerful former executives bore significant personal responsibility for keeping Epstein inside the bank.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:





gov.uscourts.nysd.591653.140.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>648epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-family-of-ethan-chapin-and-xana-kernodle-speak-out-9-12-26--75071299At CrimeCon in 2025, Ethan Chapin’s mother, Stacy Chapin, spoke emotionally about the moment she learned her son had been killed and about what life had looked like for her family ever since. She described receiving the devastating news while grocery shopping and said the reality that “Ethan’s not here” remained something the family had to live with every day. Chapin emphasized Ethan’s personality, his role as one of triplets and the importance of keeping his memory centered rather than allowing the case to become entirely about Bryan Kohberger. She also discussed the investigative technology that eventually helped identify Kohberger, but her remarks were rooted primarily in grief and the permanent absence left by Ethan’s murder. Her broader message was that the Chapin family had worked deliberately to keep moving forward, support Ethan’s surviving siblings and preserve his legacy without allowing the crime to consume every part of their lives.

Xana Kernodle’s family, meanwhile, spoke in the immediate aftermath with a mixture of disbelief, grief and frustration over how little sense the murders made. Her father, Jeff Kernodle, said Xana had been in regular contact with family, had seemed completely normal that night and had simply been at home with her boyfriend, Ethan. He also described her as tough and said the autopsy information he had received indicated she fought her attacker, reinforcing the family’s image of Xana as strong-willed and resilient. In later interviews, Jeff and Xana’s sister Jazzmin focused on who she was beyond the case, describing her as funny, uplifting, deeply caring and someone who could turn a bad situation into a good one. Xana’s mother, Cara Northington, later described how the murder sent her already difficult life into a deeper spiral of drugs and alcohol before she eventually sought recovery and faith. Across the different family accounts, the consistent theme was that Xana was far more than one of four names attached to a notorious crime: she was a vibrant, loved young woman whose family was left trying to understand a killing they repeatedly described as senseless.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com









Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75071299Sat, 12 Sep 2026 14:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciAt CrimeCon in 2025, Ethan Chapin’s mother, Stacy Chapin, spoke emotionally about the moment she learned her son had been killed and about what life had looked like for her family ever since. She described receiving the devastating news while grocery...At CrimeCon in 2025, Ethan Chapin’s mother, Stacy Chapin, spoke emotionally about the moment she learned her son had been killed and about what life had looked like for her family ever since. She described receiving the devastating news while grocery shopping and said the reality that “Ethan’s not here” remained something the family had to live with every day. Chapin emphasized Ethan’s personality, his role as one of triplets and the importance of keeping his memory centered rather than allowing the case to become entirely about Bryan Kohberger. She also discussed the investigative technology that eventually helped identify Kohberger, but her remarks were rooted primarily in grief and the permanent absence left by Ethan’s murder. Her broader message was that the Chapin family had worked deliberately to keep moving forward, support Ethan’s surviving siblings and preserve his legacy without allowing the crime to consume every part of their lives.

Xana Kernodle’s family, meanwhile, spoke in the immediate aftermath with a mixture of disbelief, grief and frustration over how little sense the murders made. Her father, Jeff Kernodle, said Xana had been in regular contact with family, had seemed completely normal that night and had simply been at home with her boyfriend, Ethan. He also described her as tough and said the autopsy information he had received indicated she fought her attacker, reinforcing the family’s image of Xana as strong-willed and resilient. In later interviews, Jeff and Xana’s sister Jazzmin focused on who she was beyond the case, describing her as funny, uplifting, deeply caring and someone who could turn a bad situation into a good one. Xana’s mother, Cara Northington, later described how the murder sent her already difficult life into a deeper spiral of drugs and alcohol before she eventually sought recovery and faith. Across the different family accounts, the consistent theme was that Xana was far more than one of four names attached to a notorious crime: she was a vibrant, loved young woman whose family was left trying to understand a killing they repeatedly described as senseless.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com









Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2783bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bethany-funke-and-the-discovery-of-the-bodies-in-moscow-9-12-26--75071297
Much of the confusion came from the fact that the public initially received only fragments of what had happened. Police first said the two surviving roommates were believed to have slept through the murders, while the 911 call was described vaguely as involving an “unconscious person,” creating the impression that the roommates had simply stumbled onto the scene hours later. Later records showed a far more complicated reality: Mortensen had seen the masked intruder, Funke and Mortensen had been texting and calling the victims during the murder window, and both were frightened and confused without understanding that four people had just been killed. Even investigators initially mixed up where some of the victims were located; one report said officers were first told Kaylee was in the second-floor bedroom with Ethan before determining that it was actually Xana on the floor there and Kaylee upstairs with Madison. Those evolving details help explain why the discovery timeline seemed contradictory for so long: the earliest public version was incomplete, while later court filings and police records revealed a chaotic morning in which the survivors knew something was badly wrong but did not immediately understand the scale of what had happened.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75071297Sat, 12 Sep 2026 12:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBethany Funke did not simply wake up and independently “discover the bodies” in the way the earliest public narrative sometimes suggested. Evidence released later showed that she had been awake during the early morning hours and had exchanged...
Much of the confusion came from the fact that the public initially received only fragments of what had happened. Police first said the two surviving roommates were believed to have slept through the murders, while the 911 call was described vaguely as involving an “unconscious person,” creating the impression that the roommates had simply stumbled onto the scene hours later. Later records showed a far more complicated reality: Mortensen had seen the masked intruder, Funke and Mortensen had been texting and calling the victims during the murder window, and both were frightened and confused without understanding that four people had just been killed. Even investigators initially mixed up where some of the victims were located; one report said officers were first told Kaylee was in the second-floor bedroom with Ethan before determining that it was actually Xana on the floor there and Kaylee upstairs with Madison. Those evolving details help explain why the discovery timeline seemed contradictory for so long: the earliest public version was incomplete, while later court filings and police records revealed a chaotic morning in which the survivors knew something was badly wrong but did not immediately understand the scale of what had happened.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2898bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-lori-vallow-daybell-and-her-road-to-radicalization-9-12-26--75071481
By 2019, that belief system had moved well beyond eccentric spirituality and into a justification for violence. Charles Vallow was labeled as possessed by a spirit called “Ned” before he was shot and killed by Lori’s brother, Alex Cox. Later, Tylee Ryan and JJ Vallow were described as zombies before they disappeared and were ultimately found buried on Chad Daybell’s property, while Chad’s wife Tammy was also characterized as spiritually dark before her death. Prosecutors argued that religion, money and personal desire became intertwined: eliminating spouses and children removed obstacles, opened the way for Lori and Chad to be together and allowed access to insurance proceeds and government benefits. A jury ultimately rejected the idea that these beliefs excused what happened and convicted Lori of murdering her children and conspiring to kill Tammy Daybell, while Chad was later convicted as well. Judge Steven Boyce summed up her descent at sentencing by saying she had gone down a “bizarre religious rabbit hole,” and even after conviction Lori continued insisting that nobody had actually been murdered.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75071481Sat, 12 Sep 2026 10:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciLori Vallow Daybell’s road to radicalization appeared to unfold gradually, moving from conventional religious belief into an increasingly extreme apocalyptic worldview that eventually placed her inside Chad Daybell’s orbit. Daybell was already...
By 2019, that belief system had moved well beyond eccentric spirituality and into a justification for violence. Charles Vallow was labeled as possessed by a spirit called “Ned” before he was shot and killed by Lori’s brother, Alex Cox. Later, Tylee Ryan and JJ Vallow were described as zombies before they disappeared and were ultimately found buried on Chad Daybell’s property, while Chad’s wife Tammy was also characterized as spiritually dark before her death. Prosecutors argued that religion, money and personal desire became intertwined: eliminating spouses and children removed obstacles, opened the way for Lori and Chad to be together and allowed access to insurance proceeds and government benefits. A jury ultimately rejected the idea that these beliefs excused what happened and convicted Lori of murdering her children and conspiring to kill Tammy Daybell, while Chad was later convicted as well. Judge Steven Boyce summed up her descent at sentencing by saying she had gone down a “bizarre religious rabbit hole,” and even after conviction Lori continued insisting that nobody had actually been murdered.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2569chaddaybell,charlesvallow,daybell,daybellcase,daybellcult,daybelltrial,doomsdaymom,idahomurders,idahosupremecourt,jjvallow,loridaybell,loridaybelltrial,lorivallow,lorivallowappeal,lorivallowdaybell,lorivallowtrial,tammydaybell,truecrime,truecrimecommunity,tyleeryantruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-chad-daybell-and-the-murder-of-jj-vallow-and-tylee-ryan-9-12-26--75071479Chad Daybell was an Idaho author and self-styled religious visionary whose apocalyptic beliefs became central to the case involving Lori Vallow Daybell and the deaths of her children, Tylee Ryan and JJ Vallow, as well as Chad’s wife, Tammy Daybell. Before the murders, Daybell wrote books about near-death experiences, the end times and preparing for societal collapse, and he claimed to receive spiritual visions and revelations. After meeting Lori in 2018, the two developed an increasingly extreme belief system involving reincarnation, “light” and “dark” spirits and the idea that some people had become “zombies” after evil spirits displaced their souls. Prosecutors argued that those beliefs were not just eccentric theology but a framework Lori and Chad used to dehumanize people who stood in their way. Tylee, JJ, Charles Vallow and Tammy Daybell were all described in this spiritual language before their deaths or disappearances.

Daybell’s role ultimately moved far beyond that of a religious influence on Lori. Prosecutors said he conspired with her and her brother Alex Cox to kill Tylee, JJ and Tammy so that he and Lori could be together and benefit financially from insurance and other assets. Tylee and JJ’s remains were discovered buried on Daybell’s property in June 2020, and evidence at trial included texts, phone data, financial records and testimony about the couple’s beliefs and relationship. A jury convicted Daybell in 2024 of murdering Tammy, Tylee and JJ and of conspiracy and insurance-fraud-related charges, and he was sentenced to death. His case became one of the starkest examples of how an increasingly radical religious worldview, personal ambition, money and a secret romantic relationship converged into a series of murders.







to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com














Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75071479Sat, 12 Sep 2026 08:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciChad Daybell was an Idaho author and self-styled religious visionary whose apocalyptic beliefs became central to the case involving Lori Vallow Daybell and the deaths of her children, Tylee Ryan and JJ Vallow, as well as Chad’s wife, Tammy Daybell....Chad Daybell was an Idaho author and self-styled religious visionary whose apocalyptic beliefs became central to the case involving Lori Vallow Daybell and the deaths of her children, Tylee Ryan and JJ Vallow, as well as Chad’s wife, Tammy Daybell. Before the murders, Daybell wrote books about near-death experiences, the end times and preparing for societal collapse, and he claimed to receive spiritual visions and revelations. After meeting Lori in 2018, the two developed an increasingly extreme belief system involving reincarnation, “light” and “dark” spirits and the idea that some people had become “zombies” after evil spirits displaced their souls. Prosecutors argued that those beliefs were not just eccentric theology but a framework Lori and Chad used to dehumanize people who stood in their way. Tylee, JJ, Charles Vallow and Tammy Daybell were all described in this spiritual language before their deaths or disappearances.

Daybell’s role ultimately moved far beyond that of a religious influence on Lori. Prosecutors said he conspired with her and her brother Alex Cox to kill Tylee, JJ and Tammy so that he and Lori could be together and benefit financially from insurance and other assets. Tylee and JJ’s remains were discovered buried on Daybell’s property in June 2020, and evidence at trial included texts, phone data, financial records and testimony about the couple’s beliefs and relationship. A jury convicted Daybell in 2024 of murdering Tammy, Tylee and JJ and of conspiracy and insurance-fraud-related charges, and he was sentenced to death. His case became one of the starkest examples of how an increasingly radical religious worldview, personal ambition, money and a secret romantic relationship converged into a series of murders.







to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com














Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3879chaddaybell,charlesvallow,daybell,daybellcase,daybellcult,daybelltrial,doomsdaymom,idahomurders,idahosupremecourt,jjvallow,loridaybell,loridaybelltrial,lorivallow,lorivallowappeal,lorivallowdaybell,lorivallowtrial,tammydaybell,truecrime,truecrimecommunity,tyleeryantruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-jean-luc-brunel-and-the-mc2-trap-9-11-26--75071494
The darker significance of MC2 was the allegation that the modeling business provided Epstein and Brunel with a ready-made pipeline to young women and girls, including foreigners whose careers, housing and immigration status could leave them dependent on the people controlling their opportunities. Virginia Giuffre alleged that Brunel used promises of modeling work to recruit girls for Epstein, while later expert evidence in the U.S. Virgin Islands litigation against JPMorgan concluded that Epstein used MC2 as part of his sex-trafficking venture. Financial records showed Epstein continuing to send money to MC2, including a $25,000 transfer from a JPMorgan account in 2012. Brunel was later arrested in France in an investigation involving allegations of rape of minors and trafficking for sexual exploitation before dying in jail in 2022. In that context, MC2 became important to understanding Epstein because it showed how the modeling world could function as more than scenery around his crimes: prosecutors, survivors and investigators alleged it provided access, recruitment channels, housing and international movement for vulnerable young women, while Epstein supplied the money that helped keep the machinery operating.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75071494Sat, 12 Sep 2026 06:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciMC2 Model Management was a modeling agency created in 2005 from the U.S. operations of French modeling agent Jean-Luc Brunel, with offices in New York and Miami. Brunel had already faced allegations dating back years concerning his treatment of young...
The darker significance of MC2 was the allegation that the modeling business provided Epstein and Brunel with a ready-made pipeline to young women and girls, including foreigners whose careers, housing and immigration status could leave them dependent on the people controlling their opportunities. Virginia Giuffre alleged that Brunel used promises of modeling work to recruit girls for Epstein, while later expert evidence in the U.S. Virgin Islands litigation against JPMorgan concluded that Epstein used MC2 as part of his sex-trafficking venture. Financial records showed Epstein continuing to send money to MC2, including a $25,000 transfer from a JPMorgan account in 2012. Brunel was later arrested in France in an investigation involving allegations of rape of minors and trafficking for sexual exploitation before dying in jail in 2022. In that context, MC2 became important to understanding Epstein because it showed how the modeling world could function as more than scenery around his crimes: prosecutors, survivors and investigators alleged it provided access, recruitment channels, housing and international movement for vulnerable young women, while Epstein supplied the money that helped keep the machinery operating.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2991epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-bryan-kohberger-and-the-plate-change--75072790
The plate change nevertheless became one more piece of the vehicle timeline investigators scrutinized as they narrowed their focus on Kohberger. Police had been combing through thousands of white Hyundai Elantras after surveillance footage captured a similar car repeatedly circling the King Road area around the time of the murders. Washington State University officers later located Kohberger’s 2015 Elantra and connected it to him through university and vehicle records. The switch from a Pennsylvania plate to Washington plates did not prove an attempt to conceal the car’s identity, but because it happened only days after the killings, it became another detail investigators had to examine alongside the Elantra’s movements, surveillance video, cellphone records and Kohberger’s later cross-country trip back to Pennsylvania.












to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75072790Sat, 12 Sep 2026 04:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciShortly after the University of Idaho murders, investigators learned that Bryan Kohberger had changed the license plate on his white Hyundai Elantra, a detail that quickly drew attention because police were already searching for a white Elantra seen...
The plate change nevertheless became one more piece of the vehicle timeline investigators scrutinized as they narrowed their focus on Kohberger. Police had been combing through thousands of white Hyundai Elantras after surveillance footage captured a similar car repeatedly circling the King Road area around the time of the murders. Washington State University officers later located Kohberger’s 2015 Elantra and connected it to him through university and vehicle records. The switch from a Pennsylvania plate to Washington plates did not prove an attempt to conceal the car’s identity, but because it happened only days after the killings, it became another detail investigators had to examine alongside the Elantra’s movements, surveillance video, cellphone records and Kohberger’s later cross-country trip back to Pennsylvania.












to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>670bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-five-key-pieces-of-evidence-against-kohberger--75072789
Mauro also highlighted surviving roommate Dylan Mortensen’s description of the masked man she saw leaving the house, saying her account of a tall, athletically built man with bushy eyebrows was broadly consistent with Kohberger’s appearance. He noted that investigators had also discovered a latent shoeprint along the route Mortensen said the intruder had taken, creating another piece of evidence prosecutors could potentially attempt to connect to Kohberger. Finally, Mauro pointed to Kohberger’s earlier criminology research, particularly a Reddit survey in which he had asked people who committed crimes about how they selected victims, prepared for offenses, approached targets and avoided detection. Mauro cautioned that Kohberger was still presumed innocent and that much remained unknown at that early stage, but he believed prosecutors already possessed several different categories of evidence that, when viewed together, could form a compelling narrative against him.












to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75072789Sat, 12 Sep 2026 02:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn January 2023, former NYPD inspector Paul Mauro argued that five pieces of evidence outlined in the probable cause affidavit had already created a potentially powerful circumstantial case against Bryan Kohberger. At the center was DNA recovered from...
Mauro also highlighted surviving roommate Dylan Mortensen’s description of the masked man she saw leaving the house, saying her account of a tall, athletically built man with bushy eyebrows was broadly consistent with Kohberger’s appearance. He noted that investigators had also discovered a latent shoeprint along the route Mortensen said the intruder had taken, creating another piece of evidence prosecutors could potentially attempt to connect to Kohberger. Finally, Mauro pointed to Kohberger’s earlier criminology research, particularly a Reddit survey in which he had asked people who committed crimes about how they selected victims, prepared for offenses, approached targets and avoided detection. Mauro cautioned that Kohberger was still presumed innocent and that much remained unknown at that early stage, but he believed prosecutors already possessed several different categories of evidence that, when viewed together, could form a compelling narrative against him.












to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>795bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-s-defense-costs-reach-1-6-million-in-charlie-kirk-murder-case-9-11-26--75057256Utah County has already spent roughly $1.6 million on Tyler Robinson’s publicly funded defense in the year since he was charged with murdering Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University, and the bill is expected to climb substantially as the death-penalty case moves toward trial. Because Robinson was found unable to afford his own attorneys, the county appointed an experienced capital-defense team led by Kathryn Nester, with Michael Burt and Richard Novak also representing him. Capital cases require lawyers who meet heightened qualifications, along with investigators, experts, extensive discovery review and unusually demanding pretrial preparation. Robinson’s case has added another layer of expense because of the extraordinary national attention surrounding Kirk’s killing, the massive volume of evidence, security requirements and the prospect of an unusually complicated jury-selection process. Utah lawmakers previously approved $2 million in state assistance after county officials warned that the case was unlike an ordinary murder prosecution and would place a significant burden on local taxpayers.

The $1.6 million figure, however, represents only what has been spent on Robinson’s defense so far, not the ultimate cost of the case. Judge Tony Graf has now ordered Robinson to stand trial on the aggravated-murder charge and the prosecution continues to seek the death penalty, meaning another expensive phase involving additional expert work, motions, jury selection, courtroom security and potentially weeks of trial testimony still lies ahead. County officials had warned from the beginning that capital prosecutions routinely cost far more than ordinary criminal cases, and Robinson’s defense was initially projected at only about $750,000, a number the case has already blown past. The mounting expense has therefore become its own subplot in the prosecution: Utah County is constitutionally obligated to provide Robinson with an adequate defense while simultaneously paying to prosecute one of the most closely watched murder cases in the country, and the $1.6 million already spent makes clear that the final taxpayer cost could be several times higher before the case is finished.

to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Charlie Kirk murder case: Utah County’s public defense costs reach $1.6 million

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75057256Sat, 12 Sep 2026 00:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciUtah County has already spent roughly $1.6 million on Tyler Robinson’s publicly funded defense in the year since he was charged with murdering Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University, and the bill is expected to climb substantially as the death-penalty...Utah County has already spent roughly $1.6 million on Tyler Robinson’s publicly funded defense in the year since he was charged with murdering Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University, and the bill is expected to climb substantially as the death-penalty case moves toward trial. Because Robinson was found unable to afford his own attorneys, the county appointed an experienced capital-defense team led by Kathryn Nester, with Michael Burt and Richard Novak also representing him. Capital cases require lawyers who meet heightened qualifications, along with investigators, experts, extensive discovery review and unusually demanding pretrial preparation. Robinson’s case has added another layer of expense because of the extraordinary national attention surrounding Kirk’s killing, the massive volume of evidence, security requirements and the prospect of an unusually complicated jury-selection process. Utah lawmakers previously approved $2 million in state assistance after county officials warned that the case was unlike an ordinary murder prosecution and would place a significant burden on local taxpayers.

The $1.6 million figure, however, represents only what has been spent on Robinson’s defense so far, not the ultimate cost of the case. Judge Tony Graf has now ordered Robinson to stand trial on the aggravated-murder charge and the prosecution continues to seek the death penalty, meaning another expensive phase involving additional expert work, motions, jury selection, courtroom security and potentially weeks of trial testimony still lies ahead. County officials had warned from the beginning that capital prosecutions routinely cost far more than ordinary criminal cases, and Robinson’s defense was initially projected at only about $750,000, a number the case has already blown past. The mounting expense has therefore become its own subplot in the prosecution: Utah County is constitutionally obligated to provide Robinson with an adequate defense while simultaneously paying to prosecute one of the most closely watched murder cases in the country, and the $1.6 million already spent makes clear that the final taxpayer cost could be several times higher before the case is finished.

to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Charlie Kirk murder case: Utah County’s public defense costs reach $1.6 million

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>775breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-epstein-survivors-and-their-lawsuit-against-frederic-fekkai-part-2-9-11-26--75057257
The complaint went further by accusing Fekkai and Coombs of knowingly enabling gender-motivated violence and helping create conditions that allowed Epstein’s trafficking operation to continue. It cited Sarah Kellen’s allegation that Fekkai sexually assaulted her in the early 2000s and noted that House investigators had already asked the Justice Department to investigate Fekkai over his relationship with Epstein. The plaintiffs brought the case under New York City’s Gender-Motivated Violence Protection Act, relying on a 2026 amendment that reopened a window for survivors to sue not only alleged abusers but also people or entities accused of enabling the abuse. The women sought damages, punitive damages, attorneys’ fees and other relief, arguing that Epstein could not have maintained such a sprawling system of exploitation without people around him providing access, services and infrastructure. Fekkai has denied allegations of wrongdoing, and the filing represented the plaintiffs’ allegations, not a judicial finding that he or Coombs committed the acts described.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75057257Fri, 11 Sep 2026 22:30:03 +0000Bobby CapucciSeven women, including five Jane Does, Kersti Ferguson and Audra Christiansen, sued celebrity hairstylist Frédéric Fekkai, his company and employee Patrick Coombs, alleging that Fekkai’s salon became part of Jeffrey Epstein’s grooming and control...
The complaint went further by accusing Fekkai and Coombs of knowingly enabling gender-motivated violence and helping create conditions that allowed Epstein’s trafficking operation to continue. It cited Sarah Kellen’s allegation that Fekkai sexually assaulted her in the early 2000s and noted that House investigators had already asked the Justice Department to investigate Fekkai over his relationship with Epstein. The plaintiffs brought the case under New York City’s Gender-Motivated Violence Protection Act, relying on a 2026 amendment that reopened a window for survivors to sue not only alleged abusers but also people or entities accused of enabling the abuse. The women sought damages, punitive damages, attorneys’ fees and other relief, arguing that Epstein could not have maintained such a sprawling system of exploitation without people around him providing access, services and infrastructure. Fekkai has denied allegations of wrongdoing, and the filing represented the plaintiffs’ allegations, not a judicial finding that he or Coombs committed the acts described.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>583epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-epstein-survivors-and-their-lawsuit-against-frederic-fekkai-part-1-9-11-26--75057255
The complaint went further by accusing Fekkai and Coombs of knowingly enabling gender-motivated violence and helping create conditions that allowed Epstein’s trafficking operation to continue. It cited Sarah Kellen’s allegation that Fekkai sexually assaulted her in the early 2000s and noted that House investigators had already asked the Justice Department to investigate Fekkai over his relationship with Epstein. The plaintiffs brought the case under New York City’s Gender-Motivated Violence Protection Act, relying on a 2026 amendment that reopened a window for survivors to sue not only alleged abusers but also people or entities accused of enabling the abuse. The women sought damages, punitive damages, attorneys’ fees and other relief, arguing that Epstein could not have maintained such a sprawling system of exploitation without people around him providing access, services and infrastructure. Fekkai has denied allegations of wrongdoing, and the filing represented the plaintiffs’ allegations, not a judicial finding that he or Coombs committed the acts described.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75057255Fri, 11 Sep 2026 20:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciSeven women, including five Jane Does, Kersti Ferguson and Audra Christiansen, sued celebrity hairstylist Frédéric Fekkai, his company and employee Patrick Coombs, alleging that Fekkai’s salon became part of Jeffrey Epstein’s grooming and control...
The complaint went further by accusing Fekkai and Coombs of knowingly enabling gender-motivated violence and helping create conditions that allowed Epstein’s trafficking operation to continue. It cited Sarah Kellen’s allegation that Fekkai sexually assaulted her in the early 2000s and noted that House investigators had already asked the Justice Department to investigate Fekkai over his relationship with Epstein. The plaintiffs brought the case under New York City’s Gender-Motivated Violence Protection Act, relying on a 2026 amendment that reopened a window for survivors to sue not only alleged abusers but also people or entities accused of enabling the abuse. The women sought damages, punitive damages, attorneys’ fees and other relief, arguing that Epstein could not have maintained such a sprawling system of exploitation without people around him providing access, services and infrastructure. Fekkai has denied allegations of wrongdoing, and the filing represented the plaintiffs’ allegations, not a judicial finding that he or Coombs committed the acts described.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>666epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/september-11-and-the-end-of-the-world-i-thought-i-knew-9-11-26--75071133
The attacks also changed the direction of my life. Before September 11, I was studying entertainment law and planned to pursue a career as a sports agent, but afterward I became focused on understanding the forces behind the attacks and the ideology of groups such as al-Qaeda. I changed my major to political science with an emphasis on the Near East and began studying the history of the region, the relationship between the Muslim world and the West, and the development of modern jihadist movements. That study also made clear that September 11 did not emerge without warning, following earlier attacks that included the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, the bombings of U.S. embassies in East Africa, and the attack on the USS Cole. The attacks marked the end of a period of personal and national innocence, replacing assumptions of security with a recognition that ideological violence could reach directly into American life. Twenty-five years later, the memory remains vivid, not only because of what happened that morning, but because of how completely it altered the way I understood the world and the path I chose to follow.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75071133Fri, 11 Sep 2026 18:30:05 +0000Bobby CapucciOn September 11, 2001, I was 21 years old and working at the Joint at the Hard Rock Hotel in Las Vegas, where crews had spent the previous day loading in the band 311 for a multi-day event. After working a 16-hour shift, I was asleep when my mother...
The attacks also changed the direction of my life. Before September 11, I was studying entertainment law and planned to pursue a career as a sports agent, but afterward I became focused on understanding the forces behind the attacks and the ideology of groups such as al-Qaeda. I changed my major to political science with an emphasis on the Near East and began studying the history of the region, the relationship between the Muslim world and the West, and the development of modern jihadist movements. That study also made clear that September 11 did not emerge without warning, following earlier attacks that included the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, the bombings of U.S. embassies in East Africa, and the attack on the USS Cole. The attacks marked the end of a period of personal and national innocence, replacing assumptions of security with a recognition that ideological violence could reach directly into American life. Twenty-five years later, the memory remains vivid, not only because of what happened that morning, but because of how completely it altered the way I understood the world and the path I chose to follow.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1028911,911memorial,alwaysremember,america,groundzero,neverforget,neverforget911,neverforgotten,newyorkcity,patriotday,remember911,rememberseptember11,september11,september112001,september11memorial,september11th,twintowers,usa,worldtradecenter,wtctruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/european-investigators-say-america-is-stonewalling-epstein-requests-9-11-26--75057253
The episode added another layer to criticism of the Justice Department’s handling of Epstein-related transparency and accountability. While millions of pages have been released in the United States, foreign investigators were reportedly trying to turn information in those files into active investigative work and needed American evidence to do it. The unanswered requests raised obvious questions about whether potentially important international leads were being stalled simply because the DOJ was not providing the material or assistance required to move them forward. That contrast was difficult to ignore: European governments were asking the United States for help investigating Epstein’s global connections, while the country that prosecuted Epstein and Maxwell and held much of the underlying evidence was allegedly not even answering them.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Trump's DOJ ghosts five European nations hunting Jeffrey Epstein's global network - Raw Story

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75057253Fri, 11 Sep 2026 16:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciLaw-enforcement agencies in at least five European countries reportedly said the U.S. Justice Department had failed to respond to formal requests for assistance as they pursued investigations stemming from the expanding Jeffrey Epstein record....
The episode added another layer to criticism of the Justice Department’s handling of Epstein-related transparency and accountability. While millions of pages have been released in the United States, foreign investigators were reportedly trying to turn information in those files into active investigative work and needed American evidence to do it. The unanswered requests raised obvious questions about whether potentially important international leads were being stalled simply because the DOJ was not providing the material or assistance required to move them forward. That contrast was difficult to ignore: European governments were asking the United States for help investigating Epstein’s global connections, while the country that prosecuted Epstein and Maxwell and held much of the underlying evidence was allegedly not even answering them.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Trump's DOJ ghosts five European nations hunting Jeffrey Epstein's global network - Raw Story

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>680epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/post-mortem-the-jes-staley-congressional-farce-part-2-9-11-26--75057254Jes Staley’s testimony to Congress was extraordinarily difficult to believe because his repeated claims of ignorance about Jeffrey Epstein collided with the sheer depth of their relationship and with Staley’s own admissions under questioning. Staley maintained that he never knew Epstein was trafficking or abusing girls, yet he acknowledged an association that involved hundreds of communications, repeated visits to Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse and Little St. James, and continued contact after Epstein’s 2008 conviction. He also admitted sharing confidential and potentially market-sensitive JPMorgan information with Epstein, including information about the bank’s communications with the Federal Reserve during the 2008 financial crisis, pending transactions and his own compensation. Staley further acknowledged that Epstein had named him as a trustee of his estate after Epstein was already a convicted sex offender. Against that record, the idea that Staley somehow remained oblivious to the kind of man Epstein was became exceedingly hard to swallow. His testimony required the listener to believe that one of the most sophisticated bankers in the world could recognize Epstein as a trusted confidant worthy of sensitive banking information and extraordinary personal access, yet somehow failed to recognize the enormous warning signs surrounding him.


There were also moments where Staley’s answers appeared less like simple failures of memory and more like attempts to explain away documentary evidence that was sitting directly in front of Congress. His descriptions of the relationship had already been contradicted by earlier messages in which he referred to Epstein in intensely personal terms, while bizarre emails involving references such as “Snow White” and other coded or sexualized language created additional credibility problems when Staley claimed he could not explain what some of them meant. He tried to maintain a distinction between knowing Epstein personally and knowing anything about his sexual conduct, even while acknowledging that he had sex with one of Epstein’s assistants after meeting her through Epstein and had spent years inside Epstein’s social world. Whether every false or implausible answer could ultimately be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to constitute criminal perjury is a separate legal question, because that would require proof that Staley knowingly made a materially false statement rather than merely giving an evasive or mistaken answer. But judged against the emails, travel, financial dealings, confidential information sharing and Staley’s own admissions, significant portions of his testimony were extremely difficult to reconcile with the established record, and his repeated professions of ignorance often sounded less like credible explanations than an effort to preserve a version of events that the documents themselves had already badly damaged.


toc ontact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75057254Fri, 11 Sep 2026 14:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJes Staley’s testimony to Congress was extraordinarily difficult to believe because his repeated claims of ignorance about Jeffrey Epstein collided with the sheer depth of their relationship and with Staley’s own admissions under questioning. Staley...Jes Staley’s testimony to Congress was extraordinarily difficult to believe because his repeated claims of ignorance about Jeffrey Epstein collided with the sheer depth of their relationship and with Staley’s own admissions under questioning. Staley maintained that he never knew Epstein was trafficking or abusing girls, yet he acknowledged an association that involved hundreds of communications, repeated visits to Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse and Little St. James, and continued contact after Epstein’s 2008 conviction. He also admitted sharing confidential and potentially market-sensitive JPMorgan information with Epstein, including information about the bank’s communications with the Federal Reserve during the 2008 financial crisis, pending transactions and his own compensation. Staley further acknowledged that Epstein had named him as a trustee of his estate after Epstein was already a convicted sex offender. Against that record, the idea that Staley somehow remained oblivious to the kind of man Epstein was became exceedingly hard to swallow. His testimony required the listener to believe that one of the most sophisticated bankers in the world could recognize Epstein as a trusted confidant worthy of sensitive banking information and extraordinary personal access, yet somehow failed to recognize the enormous warning signs surrounding him.


There were also moments where Staley’s answers appeared less like simple failures of memory and more like attempts to explain away documentary evidence that was sitting directly in front of Congress. His descriptions of the relationship had already been contradicted by earlier messages in which he referred to Epstein in intensely personal terms, while bizarre emails involving references such as “Snow White” and other coded or sexualized language created additional credibility problems when Staley claimed he could not explain what some of them meant. He tried to maintain a distinction between knowing Epstein personally and knowing anything about his sexual conduct, even while acknowledging that he had sex with one of Epstein’s assistants after meeting her through Epstein and had spent years inside Epstein’s social world. Whether every false or implausible answer could ultimately be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to constitute criminal perjury is a separate legal question, because that would require proof that Staley knowingly made a materially false statement rather than merely giving an evasive or mistaken answer. But judged against the emails, travel, financial dealings, confidential information sharing and Staley’s own admissions, significant portions of his testimony were extremely difficult to reconcile with the established record, and his repeated professions of ignorance often sounded less like credible explanations than an effort to preserve a version of events that the documents themselves had already badly damaged.


toc ontact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>688epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/post-mortem-the-jes-staley-congressional-farce-part-1-9-11-26--75057252Jes Staley’s testimony to Congress was extraordinarily difficult to believe because his repeated claims of ignorance about Jeffrey Epstein collided with the sheer depth of their relationship and with Staley’s own admissions under questioning. Staley maintained that he never knew Epstein was trafficking or abusing girls, yet he acknowledged an association that involved hundreds of communications, repeated visits to Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse and Little St. James, and continued contact after Epstein’s 2008 conviction. He also admitted sharing confidential and potentially market-sensitive JPMorgan information with Epstein, including information about the bank’s communications with the Federal Reserve during the 2008 financial crisis, pending transactions and his own compensation. Staley further acknowledged that Epstein had named him as a trustee of his estate after Epstein was already a convicted sex offender. Against that record, the idea that Staley somehow remained oblivious to the kind of man Epstein was became exceedingly hard to swallow. His testimony required the listener to believe that one of the most sophisticated bankers in the world could recognize Epstein as a trusted confidant worthy of sensitive banking information and extraordinary personal access, yet somehow failed to recognize the enormous warning signs surrounding him.


There were also moments where Staley’s answers appeared less like simple failures of memory and more like attempts to explain away documentary evidence that was sitting directly in front of Congress. His descriptions of the relationship had already been contradicted by earlier messages in which he referred to Epstein in intensely personal terms, while bizarre emails involving references such as “Snow White” and other coded or sexualized language created additional credibility problems when Staley claimed he could not explain what some of them meant. He tried to maintain a distinction between knowing Epstein personally and knowing anything about his sexual conduct, even while acknowledging that he had sex with one of Epstein’s assistants after meeting her through Epstein and had spent years inside Epstein’s social world. Whether every false or implausible answer could ultimately be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to constitute criminal perjury is a separate legal question, because that would require proof that Staley knowingly made a materially false statement rather than merely giving an evasive or mistaken answer. But judged against the emails, travel, financial dealings, confidential information sharing and Staley’s own admissions, significant portions of his testimony were extremely difficult to reconcile with the established record, and his repeated professions of ignorance often sounded less like credible explanations than an effort to preserve a version of events that the documents themselves had already badly damaged.


toc ontact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75057252Fri, 11 Sep 2026 12:30:29 +0000Bobby CapucciJes Staley’s testimony to Congress was extraordinarily difficult to believe because his repeated claims of ignorance about Jeffrey Epstein collided with the sheer depth of their relationship and with Staley’s own admissions under questioning. Staley...Jes Staley’s testimony to Congress was extraordinarily difficult to believe because his repeated claims of ignorance about Jeffrey Epstein collided with the sheer depth of their relationship and with Staley’s own admissions under questioning. Staley maintained that he never knew Epstein was trafficking or abusing girls, yet he acknowledged an association that involved hundreds of communications, repeated visits to Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse and Little St. James, and continued contact after Epstein’s 2008 conviction. He also admitted sharing confidential and potentially market-sensitive JPMorgan information with Epstein, including information about the bank’s communications with the Federal Reserve during the 2008 financial crisis, pending transactions and his own compensation. Staley further acknowledged that Epstein had named him as a trustee of his estate after Epstein was already a convicted sex offender. Against that record, the idea that Staley somehow remained oblivious to the kind of man Epstein was became exceedingly hard to swallow. His testimony required the listener to believe that one of the most sophisticated bankers in the world could recognize Epstein as a trusted confidant worthy of sensitive banking information and extraordinary personal access, yet somehow failed to recognize the enormous warning signs surrounding him.


There were also moments where Staley’s answers appeared less like simple failures of memory and more like attempts to explain away documentary evidence that was sitting directly in front of Congress. His descriptions of the relationship had already been contradicted by earlier messages in which he referred to Epstein in intensely personal terms, while bizarre emails involving references such as “Snow White” and other coded or sexualized language created additional credibility problems when Staley claimed he could not explain what some of them meant. He tried to maintain a distinction between knowing Epstein personally and knowing anything about his sexual conduct, even while acknowledging that he had sex with one of Epstein’s assistants after meeting her through Epstein and had spent years inside Epstein’s social world. Whether every false or implausible answer could ultimately be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to constitute criminal perjury is a separate legal question, because that would require proof that Staley knowingly made a materially false statement rather than merely giving an evasive or mistaken answer. But judged against the emails, travel, financial dealings, confidential information sharing and Staley’s own admissions, significant portions of his testimony were extremely difficult to reconcile with the established record, and his repeated professions of ignorance often sounded less like credible explanations than an effort to preserve a version of events that the documents themselves had already badly damaged.


toc ontact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>759epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-ghislaine-maxwell-and-her-descent-into-poverty-9-10-26--75051364
That financial collapse is now reflected directly in Maxwell’s court posture. Her latest challenge to her conviction is prosecuted pro se, meaning she is representing herself, and the federal court has addressed whether she could proceed in forma pauperis, the legal status available to litigants who say they cannot afford the ordinary costs of pursuing a case or appeal. When Judge Paul Engelmayer rejected Maxwell’s post-conviction petition in August 2026, he also ruled that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore denied her the ability to obtain in forma pauperis status for an appeal. In practical terms, Maxwell has traveled an extraordinary financial distance: from a socialite moving through some of the richest circles in the world to a federal prisoner preparing her own legal papers and potentially asking the courts to recognize that she lacks the resources to pay the costs of continuing her legal fight. Her legal woes have not merely damaged her reputation and freedom; they have effectively reduced a woman once synonymous with wealth and privilege to claiming indigence in federal court.

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75051364Fri, 11 Sep 2026 10:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciGhislaine Maxwell’s legal troubles have steadily consumed the fortune and lifestyle that once placed her among the wealthy and well-connected circles surrounding Jeffrey Epstein. Years of civil litigation were already generating enormous legal bills...
That financial collapse is now reflected directly in Maxwell’s court posture. Her latest challenge to her conviction is prosecuted pro se, meaning she is representing herself, and the federal court has addressed whether she could proceed in forma pauperis, the legal status available to litigants who say they cannot afford the ordinary costs of pursuing a case or appeal. When Judge Paul Engelmayer rejected Maxwell’s post-conviction petition in August 2026, he also ruled that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore denied her the ability to obtain in forma pauperis status for an appeal. In practical terms, Maxwell has traveled an extraordinary financial distance: from a socialite moving through some of the richest circles in the world to a federal prisoner preparing her own legal papers and potentially asking the courts to recognize that she lacks the resources to pay the costs of continuing her legal fight. Her legal woes have not merely damaged her reputation and freedom; they have effectively reduced a woman once synonymous with wealth and privilege to claiming indigence in federal court.

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3016epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-the-snapchat-google-and-verizon-tower-warrants-9-11-26--75051348
The Verizon warrant was part of the equally broad effort to reconstruct cellphone activity around 1122 King Road. Just days after the murders, investigators sought records from Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile and Inland Cellular identifying devices that connected with towers within roughly a half-mile of the house between 3 a.m. and 5 a.m. on November 13. That allowed police to examine which phones had been active near the crime scene during the critical window and compare those records with surveillance footage, witness accounts and later information connected to Kohberger. Additional Verizon warrants remained heavily sealed or redacted, but the larger purpose was clear: investigators wanted to map cellular activity before, during and after the murders and identify devices that might correspond with the movements of the white Hyundai Elantra. Taken together, the Snapchat, Google and Verizon warrants showed investigators attacking the case from three directions at once: social connections, online behavior and physical movement through cellphone networks.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75051348Fri, 11 Sep 2026 08:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe Snapchat and Google warrants showed investigators digging deeply into Bryan Kohberger’s digital life as they tried to determine whether he had communicated with the victims, researched them, followed their online activity or left behind evidence...
The Verizon warrant was part of the equally broad effort to reconstruct cellphone activity around 1122 King Road. Just days after the murders, investigators sought records from Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile and Inland Cellular identifying devices that connected with towers within roughly a half-mile of the house between 3 a.m. and 5 a.m. on November 13. That allowed police to examine which phones had been active near the crime scene during the critical window and compare those records with surveillance footage, witness accounts and later information connected to Kohberger. Additional Verizon warrants remained heavily sealed or redacted, but the larger purpose was clear: investigators wanted to map cellular activity before, during and after the murders and identify devices that might correspond with the movements of the white Hyundai Elantra. Taken together, the Snapchat, Google and Verizon warrants showed investigators attacking the case from three directions at once: social connections, online behavior and physical movement through cellphone networks.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2734bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-what-was-known-about-bryan-kohberger-directly-after-his-arrest-9-10-26--75051349Immediately after Bryan Kohberger’s arrest on December 30, 2022, the public knew remarkably little about the man accused of murdering Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. Kohberger was 28 years old, originally from Pennsylvania and was pursuing a Ph.D. in criminology at Washington State University, only about ten miles from Moscow. He had previously earned undergraduate and graduate degrees in psychology and criminal justice at DeSales University, where he had studied under forensic psychologist Katherine Ramsland. Authorities said he had been arrested at his parents’ home in Monroe County, Pennsylvania, on four counts of first-degree murder and one count of burglary. Beyond that, police revealed almost nothing about what had led them to him, and the arrest affidavit remained sealed until he was returned to Idaho. The sudden identification of a criminology doctoral student as the suspect therefore created as many questions as it answered.

At that moment, there was no publicly established motive, no known relationship between Kohberger and any of the four victims, and no explanation for why investigators believed he had entered 1122 King Road. Authorities had already spent more than six weeks pursuing thousands of tips and searching for a white Hyundai Elantra seen near the crime scene, but they initially refused to explain whether that vehicle had led them to Kohberger or what forensic evidence connected him to the house. Reports quickly emerged that the FBI had been watching him in Pennsylvania before the arrest, but the crucial details involving the knife sheath DNA, cellphone records, surveillance footage and the Elantra were not disclosed until the probable-cause affidavit became public on January 5, 2023. For those first several days, the public essentially knew Kohberger’s name, age, academic background and charges, while nearly every important question about evidence, motive, targeting and how police had identified him remained unanswered.



to contact me:


bobbycapuccci








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75051349Fri, 11 Sep 2026 06:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciImmediately after Bryan Kohberger’s arrest on December 30, 2022, the public knew remarkably little about the man accused of murdering Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. Kohberger was 28 years old, originally from...Immediately after Bryan Kohberger’s arrest on December 30, 2022, the public knew remarkably little about the man accused of murdering Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. Kohberger was 28 years old, originally from Pennsylvania and was pursuing a Ph.D. in criminology at Washington State University, only about ten miles from Moscow. He had previously earned undergraduate and graduate degrees in psychology and criminal justice at DeSales University, where he had studied under forensic psychologist Katherine Ramsland. Authorities said he had been arrested at his parents’ home in Monroe County, Pennsylvania, on four counts of first-degree murder and one count of burglary. Beyond that, police revealed almost nothing about what had led them to him, and the arrest affidavit remained sealed until he was returned to Idaho. The sudden identification of a criminology doctoral student as the suspect therefore created as many questions as it answered.

At that moment, there was no publicly established motive, no known relationship between Kohberger and any of the four victims, and no explanation for why investigators believed he had entered 1122 King Road. Authorities had already spent more than six weeks pursuing thousands of tips and searching for a white Hyundai Elantra seen near the crime scene, but they initially refused to explain whether that vehicle had led them to Kohberger or what forensic evidence connected him to the house. Reports quickly emerged that the FBI had been watching him in Pennsylvania before the arrest, but the crucial details involving the knife sheath DNA, cellphone records, surveillance footage and the Elantra were not disclosed until the probable-cause affidavit became public on January 5, 2023. For those first several days, the public essentially knew Kohberger’s name, age, academic background and charges, while nearly every important question about evidence, motive, targeting and how police had identified him remained unanswered.



to contact me:


bobbycapuccci








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2853bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-did-bryan-kohberger-stalk-any-of-his-victims-prior-to-the-murders--75051260
The same source also claimed that Kohberger had behaved as though he was extremely conscious of leaving behind fingerprints or DNA after the killings. While investigators had been surveilling him at his family’s Pennsylvania home, an officer reportedly followed Kohberger into a Giant grocery store and observed him wearing gloves throughout the visit. Other later reports described him wearing surgical or latex gloves around the house and handling trash in ways that investigators considered potentially significant. The Daily Mail source characterized Kohberger as careful and methodical, suggesting that he understood forensic evidence well enough to take precautions after the crime. At the time, those details had added to the emerging portrait of a criminology doctoral student who may have been applying his knowledge of criminal investigations to avoid detection, although the glove-wearing and alleged stalking behavior alone had not established what happened inside 1122 King Road or why the four students were killed.












to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75051260Fri, 11 Sep 2026 04:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciShortly after Bryan Kohberger’s arrest, a Daily Mail report cited an unnamed source who claimed investigators believed Kohberger had stalked at least some of the University of Idaho victims for weeks before the November 13, 2022 murders. According to...
The same source also claimed that Kohberger had behaved as though he was extremely conscious of leaving behind fingerprints or DNA after the killings. While investigators had been surveilling him at his family’s Pennsylvania home, an officer reportedly followed Kohberger into a Giant grocery store and observed him wearing gloves throughout the visit. Other later reports described him wearing surgical or latex gloves around the house and handling trash in ways that investigators considered potentially significant. The Daily Mail source characterized Kohberger as careful and methodical, suggesting that he understood forensic evidence well enough to take precautions after the crime. At the time, those details had added to the emerging portrait of a criminology doctoral student who may have been applying his knowledge of criminal investigations to avoid detection, although the glove-wearing and alleged stalking behavior alone had not established what happened inside 1122 King Road or why the four students were killed.












to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>699bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-prosecutors-respond-to-bryan-kohberger-s-witness-tampering-allegations--75051259
The investigation did not automatically mean the witness had lied or that her testimony was worthless, but it raised obvious credibility issues that prosecutors could have used aggressively at trial. If the FBI had uncovered inconsistencies, false statements or problems with the way the information was obtained, the State could have attacked the witness before the jury and argued that the defense was relying on unreliable evidence. Kohberger’s attorneys, meanwhile, would have had to show that whatever information she possessed remained relevant and trustworthy despite the federal inquiry. The episode illustrated the larger evidentiary battle surrounding the case: as the defense searched for witnesses and experts capable of undermining the prosecution’s reconstruction of the murders, prosecutors and investigators were scrutinizing not only the substance of those claims but also the people making them.












to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75051259Fri, 11 Sep 2026 02:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe FBI had investigated one of Bryan Kohberger’s proposed defense witnesses after concerns were raised about the reliability of information she planned to provide in the University of Idaho murder case. The witness, identified as a woman who claimed...
The investigation did not automatically mean the witness had lied or that her testimony was worthless, but it raised obvious credibility issues that prosecutors could have used aggressively at trial. If the FBI had uncovered inconsistencies, false statements or problems with the way the information was obtained, the State could have attacked the witness before the jury and argued that the defense was relying on unreliable evidence. Kohberger’s attorneys, meanwhile, would have had to show that whatever information she possessed remained relevant and trustworthy despite the federal inquiry. The episode illustrated the larger evidentiary battle surrounding the case: as the defense searched for witnesses and experts capable of undermining the prosecution’s reconstruction of the murders, prosecutors and investigators were scrutinizing not only the substance of those claims but also the people making them.












to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>635bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcripts-day-1-part-13-9-10-26--75029409
The defense spent much of the first day attacking the manner in which the prosecution was getting its evidence into the record rather than attempting to disprove the entire prosecution theory at that stage. Kathryn Nester and Robinson’s attorneys repeatedly raised hearsay, foundation and authentication objections, arguing that investigators were being permitted to introduce reports, statements and records created by other people without those individuals appearing personally to testify. Judge Graf overruled most of those objections, reflecting the substantially lower evidentiary threshold governing a Utah preliminary hearing, whose purpose was only to determine whether probable cause existed to send Robinson to trial rather than whether prosecutors could prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. One significant exception involved an edited compilation of surveillance footage, which Graf declined to admit in that form and required prosecutors to replace with the underlying unedited material. Hull’s testimony also revealed the scope of the prosecution’s surveillance theory: investigators claimed Robinson had appeared on or around the UVU campus multiple times on September 10 and that they were attempting to stitch those appearances together into a continuous identification of the alleged shooter. By the end of day one, prosecutors had established the killing itself, the medical cause of Kirk’s death, the existence and authenticity of substantial video evidence and the beginnings of their effort to identify Robinson as the person captured in that footage. They had not yet presented many of the pieces expected to become more consequential later in the hearing, including the rifle and DNA evidence, Robinson’s alleged communications and admissions, and testimony concerning his roommate Lance Twiggs.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75029409Fri, 11 Sep 2026 00:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay one of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing on July 6, 2026, largely centered on prosecutors beginning to construct a timeline of Charlie Kirk’s killing at Utah Valley University and establishing the authenticity of the surveillance footage and...
The defense spent much of the first day attacking the manner in which the prosecution was getting its evidence into the record rather than attempting to disprove the entire prosecution theory at that stage. Kathryn Nester and Robinson’s attorneys repeatedly raised hearsay, foundation and authentication objections, arguing that investigators were being permitted to introduce reports, statements and records created by other people without those individuals appearing personally to testify. Judge Graf overruled most of those objections, reflecting the substantially lower evidentiary threshold governing a Utah preliminary hearing, whose purpose was only to determine whether probable cause existed to send Robinson to trial rather than whether prosecutors could prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. One significant exception involved an edited compilation of surveillance footage, which Graf declined to admit in that form and required prosecutors to replace with the underlying unedited material. Hull’s testimony also revealed the scope of the prosecution’s surveillance theory: investigators claimed Robinson had appeared on or around the UVU campus multiple times on September 10 and that they were attempting to stitch those appearances together into a continuous identification of the alleged shooter. By the end of day one, prosecutors had established the killing itself, the medical cause of Kirk’s death, the existence and authenticity of substantial video evidence and the beginnings of their effort to identify Robinson as the person captured in that footage. They had not yet presented many of the pieces expected to become more consequential later in the hearing, including the rifle and DNA evidence, Robinson’s alleged communications and admissions, and testimony concerning his roommate Lance Twiggs.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>902breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/jes-staley-and-the-transcripts-from-his-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-20-9-10-26--75029407
The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein’s cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley’s professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.


to contact me:


bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75029407Thu, 10 Sep 2026 22:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe transcripts from Jes Staley’s July 24, 2026 interview with the House Oversight Committee revealed just how deep and personal his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein became, while also exposing contradictions in the way Staley had described that...
The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein’s cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley’s professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.


to contact me:


bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>869epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/jes-staley-and-the-transcripts-from-his-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-19-9-10-26--75029406
The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein’s cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley’s professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.


to contact me:


bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75029406Thu, 10 Sep 2026 20:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe transcripts from Jes Staley’s July 24, 2026 interview with the House Oversight Committee revealed just how deep and personal his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein became, while also exposing contradictions in the way Staley had described that...
The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein’s cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley’s professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.


to contact me:


bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>675epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-the-experts-behind-the-case-against-bryan-kohberger-part-14-9-10-26--75051177Katherine White, Stephanie Wilt and Hailey Youngling were all forensic scientists with Idaho State Police Forensic Services who became part of the prosecution’s expert-witness lineup in the Bryan Kohberger case. White, a Forensic Scientist III, specialized in forensic biology and DNA and was expected to explain DNA extraction, quantification, amplification, STR and Y-STR analysis, probabilistic genotyping and the examination of biological fluids and trace evidence. Her role was tied to the broader DNA work that became central to the case, including explaining how biological material was collected, preserved, tested and interpreted. Wilt was also a forensic biology and DNA scientist and personally examined numerous pieces of evidence from 1122 King Road, Kohberger’s apartment and his vehicle. Her reports covered swabs from walls, floors, doors and furniture inside the house as well as hairs, stains, vehicle upholstery and Kohberger’s reference DNA sample. She was also involved in examining the knife sheath, including presumptive testing that indicated blood was present on portions of it.

Hailey Youngling’s role was more closely connected to crime-scene and latent-print work. She responded with other ISP forensic scientists to Kohberger’s Pullman apartment on December 30, 2022, helped process the residence, verified portions of the forensic work and later participated in collecting Kohberger’s fingerprints, palm prints and other exemplars after he returned to Idaho. Youngling also served as a verifier on latent-print examinations connected to evidence from the King Road house, including prints developed from surfaces inside the residence, and she submitted at least one latent print from the sliding-door area for a database search that returned no identification. Together, White, Wilt and Youngling represented three different pieces of the forensic case the State intended to explain to jurors: White on DNA interpretation, Wilt on the biological evidence actually recovered and tested, and Youngling on the physical processing and fingerprint evidence. Their inclusion on the expert list showed just how much of the prosecution’s case depended on reconstructing the crime through laboratory science rather than through a single eyewitness or confession.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

030326+REDACTED+Exhibits+S-1+through+S-13+to+States+Amended+Supp+Resp+to+Rqst+for+Disc+RE+Expert+Testimony.pdf









Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75051177Thu, 10 Sep 2026 18:30:05 +0000Bobby CapucciKatherine White, Stephanie Wilt and Hailey Youngling were all forensic scientists with Idaho State Police Forensic Services who became part of the prosecution’s expert-witness lineup in the Bryan Kohberger case. White, a Forensic Scientist III,...Katherine White, Stephanie Wilt and Hailey Youngling were all forensic scientists with Idaho State Police Forensic Services who became part of the prosecution’s expert-witness lineup in the Bryan Kohberger case. White, a Forensic Scientist III, specialized in forensic biology and DNA and was expected to explain DNA extraction, quantification, amplification, STR and Y-STR analysis, probabilistic genotyping and the examination of biological fluids and trace evidence. Her role was tied to the broader DNA work that became central to the case, including explaining how biological material was collected, preserved, tested and interpreted. Wilt was also a forensic biology and DNA scientist and personally examined numerous pieces of evidence from 1122 King Road, Kohberger’s apartment and his vehicle. Her reports covered swabs from walls, floors, doors and furniture inside the house as well as hairs, stains, vehicle upholstery and Kohberger’s reference DNA sample. She was also involved in examining the knife sheath, including presumptive testing that indicated blood was present on portions of it.

Hailey Youngling’s role was more closely connected to crime-scene and latent-print work. She responded with other ISP forensic scientists to Kohberger’s Pullman apartment on December 30, 2022, helped process the residence, verified portions of the forensic work and later participated in collecting Kohberger’s fingerprints, palm prints and other exemplars after he returned to Idaho. Youngling also served as a verifier on latent-print examinations connected to evidence from the King Road house, including prints developed from surfaces inside the residence, and she submitted at least one latent print from the sliding-door area for a database search that returned no identification. Together, White, Wilt and Youngling represented three different pieces of the forensic case the State intended to explain to jurors: White on DNA interpretation, Wilt on the biological evidence actually recovered and tested, and Youngling on the physical processing and fingerprint evidence. Their inclusion on the expert list showed just how much of the prosecution’s case depended on reconstructing the crime through laboratory science rather than through a single eyewitness or confession.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

030326+REDACTED+Exhibits+S-1+through+S-13+to+States+Amended+Supp+Resp+to+Rqst+for+Disc+RE+Expert+Testimony.pdf









Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>718bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-donald-trump-and-jeffrey-epstein-memorial-reading-room-opens-in-dallas-9-10-26--75029408
The exhibit opened in Dallas as the Republican National Committee’s midterm convention began and as Trump arrived in the city, giving the project an unmistakably political backdrop even though organizers insisted the timing was coincidental and the purpose was survivor-centered rather than partisan. Survivors appearing at the exhibit argued that the document releases still leave major questions unanswered, particularly because they believe powerful people and alleged co-conspirators remain shielded by redactions while survivors themselves have repeatedly had their private information exposed. Organizers said the broader goal is to make the Epstein records accessible to ordinary people and keep pressure on institutions to investigate anyone implicated by credible evidence, regardless of wealth or political power. The Dallas stop is the beginning of a planned national tour, turning millions of pages that have largely existed as digital government releases into a physical public record that people can examine for themselves.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75029408Thu, 10 Sep 2026 16:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciA traveling exhibit in Dallas is putting roughly three million pages of Jeffrey Epstein-related records on public display while deliberately highlighting Epstein’s past relationship with President Donald Trump. Organizers have named it the “Donald J....
The exhibit opened in Dallas as the Republican National Committee’s midterm convention began and as Trump arrived in the city, giving the project an unmistakably political backdrop even though organizers insisted the timing was coincidental and the purpose was survivor-centered rather than partisan. Survivors appearing at the exhibit argued that the document releases still leave major questions unanswered, particularly because they believe powerful people and alleged co-conspirators remain shielded by redactions while survivors themselves have repeatedly had their private information exposed. Organizers said the broader goal is to make the Epstein records accessible to ordinary people and keep pressure on institutions to investigate anyone implicated by credible evidence, regardless of wealth or political power. The Dallas stop is the beginning of a planned national tour, turning millions of pages that have largely existed as digital government releases into a physical public record that people can examine for themselves.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>791epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/former-new-mexico-ag-gary-king-faces-new-epstein-scrutiny-part-2-9-10-26--75029405
King’s defense that his office never investigated Epstein because it received no formal complaints also invited scrutiny rather than resolving it. By 2010, Epstein’s criminal history was public, his New Mexico ranch was well known, and questions already existed about his sex-offender registration status in the state. Against that backdrop, the absence of a formal complaint did not erase the larger question of whether New Mexico officials should have exercised more curiosity about a wealthy convicted sex offender with deep local connections and political access. King may be technically correct that Epstein was not his “friend” in the ordinary sense, but that formulation risks becoming a distraction from the more important record: money flowed into King’s political orbit, meetings were arranged, family ties existed, and Epstein remained connected to powerful people in New Mexico long after his conviction. The growing scrutiny is therefore less about proving friendship and more about whether King is now trying to minimize a relationship that, whatever label he prefers, was clearly more substantial than a passing acquaintance.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

'He wasn't my friend': Former New Mexico AG Gary King distances himself from Epstein | Local News | santafenewmexican.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75029405Thu, 10 Sep 2026 14:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciFormer New Mexico Attorney General Gary King’s effort to distance himself from Jeffrey Epstein rested heavily on semantics, particularly his insistence that Epstein “wasn’t my friend.” But the documentary record made that explanation look increasingly...
King’s defense that his office never investigated Epstein because it received no formal complaints also invited scrutiny rather than resolving it. By 2010, Epstein’s criminal history was public, his New Mexico ranch was well known, and questions already existed about his sex-offender registration status in the state. Against that backdrop, the absence of a formal complaint did not erase the larger question of whether New Mexico officials should have exercised more curiosity about a wealthy convicted sex offender with deep local connections and political access. King may be technically correct that Epstein was not his “friend” in the ordinary sense, but that formulation risks becoming a distraction from the more important record: money flowed into King’s political orbit, meetings were arranged, family ties existed, and Epstein remained connected to powerful people in New Mexico long after his conviction. The growing scrutiny is therefore less about proving friendship and more about whether King is now trying to minimize a relationship that, whatever label he prefers, was clearly more substantial than a passing acquaintance.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

'He wasn't my friend': Former New Mexico AG Gary King distances himself from Epstein | Local News | santafenewmexican.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>907epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/former-new-mexico-ag-gary-king-faces-new-epstein-scrutiny-part-1-9-10-26--75029404
King’s defense that his office never investigated Epstein because it received no formal complaints also invited scrutiny rather than resolving it. By 2010, Epstein’s criminal history was public, his New Mexico ranch was well known, and questions already existed about his sex-offender registration status in the state. Against that backdrop, the absence of a formal complaint did not erase the larger question of whether New Mexico officials should have exercised more curiosity about a wealthy convicted sex offender with deep local connections and political access. King may be technically correct that Epstein was not his “friend” in the ordinary sense, but that formulation risks becoming a distraction from the more important record: money flowed into King’s political orbit, meetings were arranged, family ties existed, and Epstein remained connected to powerful people in New Mexico long after his conviction. The growing scrutiny is therefore less about proving friendship and more about whether King is now trying to minimize a relationship that, whatever label he prefers, was clearly more substantial than a passing acquaintance.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

'He wasn't my friend': Former New Mexico AG Gary King distances himself from Epstein | Local News | santafenewmexican.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75029404Thu, 10 Sep 2026 12:30:03 +0000Bobby CapucciFormer New Mexico Attorney General Gary King’s effort to distance himself from Jeffrey Epstein rested heavily on semantics, particularly his insistence that Epstein “wasn’t my friend.” But the documentary record made that explanation look increasingly...
King’s defense that his office never investigated Epstein because it received no formal complaints also invited scrutiny rather than resolving it. By 2010, Epstein’s criminal history was public, his New Mexico ranch was well known, and questions already existed about his sex-offender registration status in the state. Against that backdrop, the absence of a formal complaint did not erase the larger question of whether New Mexico officials should have exercised more curiosity about a wealthy convicted sex offender with deep local connections and political access. King may be technically correct that Epstein was not his “friend” in the ordinary sense, but that formulation risks becoming a distraction from the more important record: money flowed into King’s political orbit, meetings were arranged, family ties existed, and Epstein remained connected to powerful people in New Mexico long after his conviction. The growing scrutiny is therefore less about proving friendship and more about whether King is now trying to minimize a relationship that, whatever label he prefers, was clearly more substantial than a passing acquaintance.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

'He wasn't my friend': Former New Mexico AG Gary King distances himself from Epstein | Local News | santafenewmexican.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>927epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-dr-baden-joni-johnson-and-john-kelly-weigh-in-on-the-murders-9-10-26--75025219Dr. Michael Baden, forensic psychologist Joni Johnston and criminal profiler John Kelly were among the experts who weighed in publicly as investigators tried to make sense of the University of Idaho murders before the full case against Bryan Kohberger was known. Baden focused heavily on the physical crime scene and the likely use of a large fixed-blade knife, explaining that the wounds, blood patterns and condition of the victims could help investigators determine the sequence of the attacks, whether the killer had been injured and whether DNA or other trace evidence had been left behind. He also emphasized that a crime involving four stabbing victims would have been physically demanding and extremely difficult to carry out without transferring biological evidence somewhere along the way. Johnston examined the behavioral side of the case, discussing the possibility that the killer had selected the house or one of the victims beforehand and stressing that the apparently targeted nature of the attack suggested planning rather than a completely random burst of violence.

Kelly similarly approached the case through behavioral profiling, arguing that the killer likely had some degree of familiarity with the residence, the victims or their routines because moving through a dark, multi-level house and attacking four people carried enormous risk. He suggested that the offender may have rehearsed the crime mentally, watched the house or otherwise prepared before entering, and that the brutality of the killings could point to obsession, anger, fantasy or a desire for control. All three experts cautioned, in different ways, that early profiling could only go so far without access to the full crime-scene evidence. Their commentary nevertheless reflected the central questions investigators were confronting at the time: why that house was chosen, whether one person was the primary target, how the killer managed to move through the residence, what physical evidence was left behind and whether the attack represented a long-developing fixation rather than a spontaneous act.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75025219Thu, 10 Sep 2026 10:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDr. Michael Baden, forensic psychologist Joni Johnston and criminal profiler John Kelly were among the experts who weighed in publicly as investigators tried to make sense of the University of Idaho murders before the full case against Bryan Kohberger...Dr. Michael Baden, forensic psychologist Joni Johnston and criminal profiler John Kelly were among the experts who weighed in publicly as investigators tried to make sense of the University of Idaho murders before the full case against Bryan Kohberger was known. Baden focused heavily on the physical crime scene and the likely use of a large fixed-blade knife, explaining that the wounds, blood patterns and condition of the victims could help investigators determine the sequence of the attacks, whether the killer had been injured and whether DNA or other trace evidence had been left behind. He also emphasized that a crime involving four stabbing victims would have been physically demanding and extremely difficult to carry out without transferring biological evidence somewhere along the way. Johnston examined the behavioral side of the case, discussing the possibility that the killer had selected the house or one of the victims beforehand and stressing that the apparently targeted nature of the attack suggested planning rather than a completely random burst of violence.

Kelly similarly approached the case through behavioral profiling, arguing that the killer likely had some degree of familiarity with the residence, the victims or their routines because moving through a dark, multi-level house and attacking four people carried enormous risk. He suggested that the offender may have rehearsed the crime mentally, watched the house or otherwise prepared before entering, and that the brutality of the killings could point to obsession, anger, fantasy or a desire for control. All three experts cautioned, in different ways, that early profiling could only go so far without access to the full crime-scene evidence. Their commentary nevertheless reflected the central questions investigators were confronting at the time: why that house was chosen, whether one person was the primary target, how the killer managed to move through the residence, what physical evidence was left behind and whether the attack represented a long-developing fixation rather than a spontaneous act.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2989bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-what-the-warrants-told-us-about-the-kohberger-investigation-early-on-9-10-26--75025218
The warrants also exposed how many questions investigators were still trying to answer after Kohberger had already become their primary suspect. They were searching for the murder weapon, victim property, blood or other biological material, dark clothing, footwear capable of producing the footprint found inside the house, digital evidence of planning, and any indication that Kohberger had researched the victims or the residence. At the same time, the breadth of the warrants showed that detectives were testing alternative possibilities and trying to fill gaps in motive, preparation and post-crime conduct. Not everything seized or requested turned out to be incriminating, and the warrants themselves were investigative tools rather than proof of guilt. But taken together, they showed an investigation that had expanded into nearly every corner of Kohberger’s life, with police attempting to connect the physical crime scene, the white Hyundai Elantra, cellphone activity, DNA, financial records and his digital footprint into one coherent account of what happened before, during and after the murders.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75025218Thu, 10 Sep 2026 08:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe search warrants showed that investigators in the Moscow murders case cast an exceptionally wide net as they tried to reconstruct Bryan Kohberger’s movements, communications, purchases and behavior before and after the killings. Authorities sought...
The warrants also exposed how many questions investigators were still trying to answer after Kohberger had already become their primary suspect. They were searching for the murder weapon, victim property, blood or other biological material, dark clothing, footwear capable of producing the footprint found inside the house, digital evidence of planning, and any indication that Kohberger had researched the victims or the residence. At the same time, the breadth of the warrants showed that detectives were testing alternative possibilities and trying to fill gaps in motive, preparation and post-crime conduct. Not everything seized or requested turned out to be incriminating, and the warrants themselves were investigative tools rather than proof of guilt. But taken together, they showed an investigation that had expanded into nearly every corner of Kohberger’s life, with police attempting to connect the physical crime scene, the white Hyundai Elantra, cellphone activity, DNA, financial records and his digital footprint into one coherent account of what happened before, during and after the murders.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2932bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-the-dossiers-he-kept-on-the-survivors-9-9-26--75025455Jeffrey Epstein’s control over the girls and young women he exploited went far beyond the abuse itself. Survivor accounts and court records describe a system in which Epstein gathered intimate information about their families, finances, ambitions, relationships, immigration problems, insecurities and personal crises, then used those vulnerabilities as leverage. In that sense, the information functioned like individualized dossiers: he learned what each woman wanted, what she feared and what could be taken away from her. Survivors have described Epstein inserting himself into virtually every part of their lives, offering money, jobs, education, housing, career connections or help for relatives while simultaneously creating dependency and isolation. Dani Bensky, for example, has said she brought Epstein her mother’s brain scans after her mother was diagnosed with a tumor, only for Epstein to later use the prospect of helping her mother as leverage while demanding more from her. Other survivors have described Epstein tracking them after they changed phone numbers, jobs or even states, reinforcing the message that simply walking away would not necessarily end his reach.

That accumulation of private information became part of Epstein’s machinery of coercion. He could exploit financial desperation with payments, threaten opportunities he had promised, manipulate women through their families and relationships, and use shame or fear of exposure to keep them compliant. Court filings brought by the U.S. Virgin Islands describe an enterprise that preyed on vulnerabilities, controlled communications, confiscated passports in some circumstances, threatened violence and pressured victims to recruit additional girls, while survivors have described an environment in which Epstein controlled everything from their finances and whereabouts to clothing and everyday behavior. The result was a system in which secrets were not merely things Epstein happened to know; they became instruments of power. By making himself the person who supposedly held the solution to a survivor’s problems while also possessing information capable of frightening, embarrassing or destabilizing her, Epstein created the kind of psychological trap that makes coercion difficult to understand from the outside. His power rested not only on money and famous connections, but on knowing exactly where each survivor was vulnerable and repeatedly demonstrating that he was willing to exploit it.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75025455Thu, 10 Sep 2026 06:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJeffrey Epstein’s control over the girls and young women he exploited went far beyond the abuse itself. Survivor accounts and court records describe a system in which Epstein gathered intimate information about their families, finances, ambitions,...Jeffrey Epstein’s control over the girls and young women he exploited went far beyond the abuse itself. Survivor accounts and court records describe a system in which Epstein gathered intimate information about their families, finances, ambitions, relationships, immigration problems, insecurities and personal crises, then used those vulnerabilities as leverage. In that sense, the information functioned like individualized dossiers: he learned what each woman wanted, what she feared and what could be taken away from her. Survivors have described Epstein inserting himself into virtually every part of their lives, offering money, jobs, education, housing, career connections or help for relatives while simultaneously creating dependency and isolation. Dani Bensky, for example, has said she brought Epstein her mother’s brain scans after her mother was diagnosed with a tumor, only for Epstein to later use the prospect of helping her mother as leverage while demanding more from her. Other survivors have described Epstein tracking them after they changed phone numbers, jobs or even states, reinforcing the message that simply walking away would not necessarily end his reach.

That accumulation of private information became part of Epstein’s machinery of coercion. He could exploit financial desperation with payments, threaten opportunities he had promised, manipulate women through their families and relationships, and use shame or fear of exposure to keep them compliant. Court filings brought by the U.S. Virgin Islands describe an enterprise that preyed on vulnerabilities, controlled communications, confiscated passports in some circumstances, threatened violence and pressured victims to recruit additional girls, while survivors have described an environment in which Epstein controlled everything from their finances and whereabouts to clothing and everyday behavior. The result was a system in which secrets were not merely things Epstein happened to know; they became instruments of power. By making himself the person who supposedly held the solution to a survivor’s problems while also possessing information capable of frightening, embarrassing or destabilizing her, Epstein created the kind of psychological trap that makes coercion difficult to understand from the outside. His power rested not only on money and famous connections, but on knowing exactly where each survivor was vulnerable and repeatedly demonstrating that he was willing to exploit it.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2627epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-bryan-kohberger-the-new-york-times-and-the-termination-letter-9-10-26--75025230Washington State University had been investigating Bryan Kohberger’s conduct as a criminology Ph.D. student and teaching assistant during the same period in which the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin occurred. Faculty concerns reportedly began early in the fall 2022 semester and included Kohberger’s interactions with professors as well as complaints from female students who said his behavior made them uncomfortable. In one reported incident, he was accused of following a woman to her car, although the university’s investigation did not find him guilty of wrongdoing over the complaints involving women. Less than two weeks before the November 13 murders, Kohberger was called into a faculty meeting to discuss mounting concerns about his conduct, and he had already been placed on an improvement plan after an earlier verbal altercation with a professor.

The problems continued after the murders, before Kohberger had publicly emerged as a suspect. WSU faculty ultimately decided in December to remove him from his teaching-assistant position and the funding attached to it, citing unsatisfactory performance and his failure to meet expected standards of professional behavior in his dealings with faculty. The disciplinary timeline was significant because it showed that Kohberger had been experiencing escalating problems in his academic and professional life before and immediately after the killings, independent of the criminal investigation that was closing in on him. None of the university complaints established a motive for the murders, and faculty members had not connected his behavior to the killings at the time, but the records added another troubling layer to the picture of Kohberger’s life in the months surrounding the crime.










Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75025230Thu, 10 Sep 2026 04:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciWashington State University had been investigating Bryan Kohberger’s conduct as a criminology Ph.D. student and teaching assistant during the same period in which the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin occurred....Washington State University had been investigating Bryan Kohberger’s conduct as a criminology Ph.D. student and teaching assistant during the same period in which the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin occurred. Faculty concerns reportedly began early in the fall 2022 semester and included Kohberger’s interactions with professors as well as complaints from female students who said his behavior made them uncomfortable. In one reported incident, he was accused of following a woman to her car, although the university’s investigation did not find him guilty of wrongdoing over the complaints involving women. Less than two weeks before the November 13 murders, Kohberger was called into a faculty meeting to discuss mounting concerns about his conduct, and he had already been placed on an improvement plan after an earlier verbal altercation with a professor.

The problems continued after the murders, before Kohberger had publicly emerged as a suspect. WSU faculty ultimately decided in December to remove him from his teaching-assistant position and the funding attached to it, citing unsatisfactory performance and his failure to meet expected standards of professional behavior in his dealings with faculty. The disciplinary timeline was significant because it showed that Kohberger had been experiencing escalating problems in his academic and professional life before and immediately after the killings, independent of the criminal investigation that was closing in on him. None of the university complaints established a motive for the murders, and faculty members had not connected his behavior to the killings at the time, but the records added another troubling layer to the picture of Kohberger’s life in the months surrounding the crime.










Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>761bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-bryan-kohberger-and-the-dateline-special--75025231

The allegation became even more troubling because Kohberger knew the woman’s Wi-Fi information and was believed to have had the technical ability to access the security cameras after installing them, potentially allowing him to watch her remotely. Former FBI profiler Greg Cooper told Dateline that, if the account was accurate, the episode could have reflected a desire for power and control, with Kohberger allegedly creating the problem and then presenting himself as the person who could solve it. The claim attracted enormous attention after Kohberger was charged with murdering Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin because it appeared to describe intrusive and manipulative behavior toward another young woman before the killings. However, the break-in and spying allegations came from unnamed sources and were not, at the time of the reporting, established through an official police filing or court finding.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75025231Thu, 10 Sep 2026 02:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciMonths before the University of Idaho murders, Bryan Kohberger was accused in a 2023 Dateline report of carrying out a disturbing scheme involving a female colleague at Washington State University. According to unnamed sources cited by the program,...

The allegation became even more troubling because Kohberger knew the woman’s Wi-Fi information and was believed to have had the technical ability to access the security cameras after installing them, potentially allowing him to watch her remotely. Former FBI profiler Greg Cooper told Dateline that, if the account was accurate, the episode could have reflected a desire for power and control, with Kohberger allegedly creating the problem and then presenting himself as the person who could solve it. The claim attracted enormous attention after Kohberger was charged with murdering Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin because it appeared to describe intrusive and manipulative behavior toward another young woman before the killings. However, the break-in and spying allegations came from unnamed sources and were not, at the time of the reporting, established through an official police filing or court finding.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>722bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcripts-day-1-part-12-9-9-26--75025243
The defense spent much of the first day attacking the manner in which the prosecution was getting its evidence into the record rather than attempting to disprove the entire prosecution theory at that stage. Kathryn Nester and Robinson’s attorneys repeatedly raised hearsay, foundation and authentication objections, arguing that investigators were being permitted to introduce reports, statements and records created by other people without those individuals appearing personally to testify. Judge Graf overruled most of those objections, reflecting the substantially lower evidentiary threshold governing a Utah preliminary hearing, whose purpose was only to determine whether probable cause existed to send Robinson to trial rather than whether prosecutors could prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. One significant exception involved an edited compilation of surveillance footage, which Graf declined to admit in that form and required prosecutors to replace with the underlying unedited material. Hull’s testimony also revealed the scope of the prosecution’s surveillance theory: investigators claimed Robinson had appeared on or around the UVU campus multiple times on September 10 and that they were attempting to stitch those appearances together into a continuous identification of the alleged shooter. By the end of day one, prosecutors had established the killing itself, the medical cause of Kirk’s death, the existence and authenticity of substantial video evidence and the beginnings of their effort to identify Robinson as the person captured in that footage. They had not yet presented many of the pieces expected to become more consequential later in the hearing, including the rifle and DNA evidence, Robinson’s alleged communications and admissions, and testimony concerning his roommate Lance Twiggs.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75025243Thu, 10 Sep 2026 00:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay one of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing on July 6, 2026, largely centered on prosecutors beginning to construct a timeline of Charlie Kirk’s killing at Utah Valley University and establishing the authenticity of the surveillance footage and...
The defense spent much of the first day attacking the manner in which the prosecution was getting its evidence into the record rather than attempting to disprove the entire prosecution theory at that stage. Kathryn Nester and Robinson’s attorneys repeatedly raised hearsay, foundation and authentication objections, arguing that investigators were being permitted to introduce reports, statements and records created by other people without those individuals appearing personally to testify. Judge Graf overruled most of those objections, reflecting the substantially lower evidentiary threshold governing a Utah preliminary hearing, whose purpose was only to determine whether probable cause existed to send Robinson to trial rather than whether prosecutors could prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. One significant exception involved an edited compilation of surveillance footage, which Graf declined to admit in that form and required prosecutors to replace with the underlying unedited material. Hull’s testimony also revealed the scope of the prosecution’s surveillance theory: investigators claimed Robinson had appeared on or around the UVU campus multiple times on September 10 and that they were attempting to stitch those appearances together into a continuous identification of the alleged shooter. By the end of day one, prosecutors had established the killing itself, the medical cause of Kirk’s death, the existence and authenticity of substantial video evidence and the beginnings of their effort to identify Robinson as the person captured in that footage. They had not yet presented many of the pieces expected to become more consequential later in the hearing, including the rifle and DNA evidence, Robinson’s alleged communications and admissions, and testimony concerning his roommate Lance Twiggs.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>786breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/jes-staley-and-the-transcripts-from-his-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-18-9-9-26--75010440
The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein’s cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley’s professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.


to contact me:


bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75010440Wed, 09 Sep 2026 22:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe transcripts from Jes Staley’s July 24, 2026 interview with the House Oversight Committee revealed just how deep and personal his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein became, while also exposing contradictions in the way Staley had described that...
The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein’s cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley’s professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.


to contact me:


bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>763epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/jes-staley-and-the-transcripts-from-his-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-17-9-9-26--75010436
The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein’s cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley’s professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.


to contact me:


bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75010436Wed, 09 Sep 2026 20:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe transcripts from Jes Staley’s July 24, 2026 interview with the House Oversight Committee revealed just how deep and personal his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein became, while also exposing contradictions in the way Staley had described that...
The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein’s cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley’s professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.


to contact me:


bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>693epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoverupfalsefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/jes-staley-and-the-transcripts-from-his-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-16-9-9-26--75010438
The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein’s cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley’s professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.


to contact me:


bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75010438Wed, 09 Sep 2026 18:30:04 +0000Bobby CapucciThe transcripts from Jes Staley’s July 24, 2026 interview with the House Oversight Committee revealed just how deep and personal his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein became, while also exposing contradictions in the way Staley had described that...
The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein’s cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley’s professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.


to contact me:


bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>651epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-the-experts-behind-the-case-against-bryan-kohberger-part-13-9-9-26--75025169
The disclosure also laid the groundwork for Walthall to explain why the absence of a fingerprint did not necessarily mean an object had never been handled. She was expected to testify that latent-print recovery depended on numerous variables, including the texture and condition of the surface, pressure and duration of contact, sweat and oil production, contamination, smearing, environmental exposure and what happened to the item after it was touched. Walthall would also explain the ACE-V comparison process, verification procedures and the Multi-Modal Biometric Identification System used to search fingerprint databases when necessary. The significance for the Kohberger case was straightforward: prosecutors were preparing to acknowledge that the knife sheath contained no usable latent prints while using Walthall to explain scientifically why the absence of fingerprints could not, by itself, establish that Kohberger or anyone else had never handled it.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

030326+REDACTED+Exhibits+S-1+through+S-13+to+States+Amended+Supp+Resp+to+Rqst+for+Disc+RE+Expert+Testimony.pdf


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75025169Wed, 09 Sep 2026 16:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe State’s amended supplemental expert disclosure for Idaho State Police forensic scientist Tina Walthall outlined the latent-print testimony prosecutors expected to present in Bryan Kohberger’s case. Walthall was identified as a forensic science...
The disclosure also laid the groundwork for Walthall to explain why the absence of a fingerprint did not necessarily mean an object had never been handled. She was expected to testify that latent-print recovery depended on numerous variables, including the texture and condition of the surface, pressure and duration of contact, sweat and oil production, contamination, smearing, environmental exposure and what happened to the item after it was touched. Walthall would also explain the ACE-V comparison process, verification procedures and the Multi-Modal Biometric Identification System used to search fingerprint databases when necessary. The significance for the Kohberger case was straightforward: prosecutors were preparing to acknowledge that the knife sheath contained no usable latent prints while using Walthall to explain scientifically why the absence of fingerprints could not, by itself, establish that Kohberger or anyone else had never handled it.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

030326+REDACTED+Exhibits+S-1+through+S-13+to+States+Amended+Supp+Resp+to+Rqst+for+Disc+RE+Expert+Testimony.pdf


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>720bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/julia-molchanova-on-escaping-jeffrey-epstein-s-cult-like-world-part-2-9-9-26--75010437
Molchanova said she finally began breaking away in early 2019 after discovering unfamiliar credit cards and spending on her credit report and realizing that Epstein appeared to be using financial accounts and entities connected to her name without her knowledge. She confronted his bookkeeper, accountant Richard Kahn and eventually Epstein himself, telling him she wanted a normal life and wanted out of JSC Interiors. She refused an invitation to meet Epstein in Palm Beach and never returned to him, escaping only months before his July 2019 arrest. Molchanova later revealed that she was the lead Jane Doe plaintiff in the class-action lawsuit accusing Bank of America of ignoring suspicious transactions connected to Epstein’s trafficking operation; that case resulted in a $72.5 million settlement for survivors. Her account presents Epstein’s operation not simply as a series of individual assaults, but as a highly organized system of psychological, sexual and financial control in which career promises, money, housing, relationships and even corporate entities were used to keep women dependent and confused about the extent to which their lives had been taken over.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

How One Woman Was Caught in Epstein’s ‘Cult’—and Escaped - WSJ

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75010437Wed, 09 Sep 2026 14:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJulia Molchanova, a Russian woman who met Jeffrey Epstein in New York in 2011 when she was 22, described how he drew her into what she later called a “cult”-like system of control by exploiting her ambitions and vulnerabilities. Epstein initially...
Molchanova said she finally began breaking away in early 2019 after discovering unfamiliar credit cards and spending on her credit report and realizing that Epstein appeared to be using financial accounts and entities connected to her name without her knowledge. She confronted his bookkeeper, accountant Richard Kahn and eventually Epstein himself, telling him she wanted a normal life and wanted out of JSC Interiors. She refused an invitation to meet Epstein in Palm Beach and never returned to him, escaping only months before his July 2019 arrest. Molchanova later revealed that she was the lead Jane Doe plaintiff in the class-action lawsuit accusing Bank of America of ignoring suspicious transactions connected to Epstein’s trafficking operation; that case resulted in a $72.5 million settlement for survivors. Her account presents Epstein’s operation not simply as a series of individual assaults, but as a highly organized system of psychological, sexual and financial control in which career promises, money, housing, relationships and even corporate entities were used to keep women dependent and confused about the extent to which their lives had been taken over.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

How One Woman Was Caught in Epstein’s ‘Cult’—and Escaped - WSJ

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>887epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/julia-molchanova-on-escaping-jeffrey-epstein-s-cult-like-world-part-1-9-9-26--75010439
Molchanova said she finally began breaking away in early 2019 after discovering unfamiliar credit cards and spending on her credit report and realizing that Epstein appeared to be using financial accounts and entities connected to her name without her knowledge. She confronted his bookkeeper, accountant Richard Kahn and eventually Epstein himself, telling him she wanted a normal life and wanted out of JSC Interiors. She refused an invitation to meet Epstein in Palm Beach and never returned to him, escaping only months before his July 2019 arrest. Molchanova later revealed that she was the lead Jane Doe plaintiff in the class-action lawsuit accusing Bank of America of ignoring suspicious transactions connected to Epstein’s trafficking operation; that case resulted in a $72.5 million settlement for survivors. Her account presents Epstein’s operation not simply as a series of individual assaults, but as a highly organized system of psychological, sexual and financial control in which career promises, money, housing, relationships and even corporate entities were used to keep women dependent and confused about the extent to which their lives had been taken over.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

How One Woman Was Caught in Epstein’s ‘Cult’—and Escaped - WSJ

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75010439Wed, 09 Sep 2026 12:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJulia Molchanova, a Russian woman who met Jeffrey Epstein in New York in 2011 when she was 22, described how he drew her into what she later called a “cult”-like system of control by exploiting her ambitions and vulnerabilities. Epstein initially...
Molchanova said she finally began breaking away in early 2019 after discovering unfamiliar credit cards and spending on her credit report and realizing that Epstein appeared to be using financial accounts and entities connected to her name without her knowledge. She confronted his bookkeeper, accountant Richard Kahn and eventually Epstein himself, telling him she wanted a normal life and wanted out of JSC Interiors. She refused an invitation to meet Epstein in Palm Beach and never returned to him, escaping only months before his July 2019 arrest. Molchanova later revealed that she was the lead Jane Doe plaintiff in the class-action lawsuit accusing Bank of America of ignoring suspicious transactions connected to Epstein’s trafficking operation; that case resulted in a $72.5 million settlement for survivors. Her account presents Epstein’s operation not simply as a series of individual assaults, but as a highly organized system of psychological, sexual and financial control in which career promises, money, housing, relationships and even corporate entities were used to keep women dependent and confused about the extent to which their lives had been taken over.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

How One Woman Was Caught in Epstein’s ‘Cult’—and Escaped - WSJ

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>804epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-an-the-bushy-eye-brow-motions-9-9-26--75002323

Judge Hippler denied Kohberger’s request and ruled on April 18, 2025, that Mortensen could testify about the intruder’s “bushy eyebrows.” Hippler called the description highly relevant because Mortensen was the only eyewitness who saw the suspected killer inside the house and said her account had been “remarkably consistent” across five law-enforcement interviews and her grand-jury testimony. He rejected the defense argument that questions about visibility, intoxication or reliability rendered her incompetent to offer the description, explaining that there was a major difference between excluding a witness altogether and allowing the defense to attack that witness through vigorous cross-examination. Hippler ultimately ruled that it was the jury’s responsibility to decide how much weight to give Mortensen’s description and whether Kohberger was the masked man she saw, meaning the defense would have been free to challenge the “bushy eyebrows” identification at trial but could not erase it from the prosecution’s case beforehand.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75002323Wed, 09 Sep 2026 10:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBryan Kohberger’s defense filed a motion in limine asking Judge Steven Hippler to prevent surviving roommate Dylan Mortensen from describing the masked intruder she saw inside 1122 King Road as having “bushy eyebrows.” The defense argued that the...

Judge Hippler denied Kohberger’s request and ruled on April 18, 2025, that Mortensen could testify about the intruder’s “bushy eyebrows.” Hippler called the description highly relevant because Mortensen was the only eyewitness who saw the suspected killer inside the house and said her account had been “remarkably consistent” across five law-enforcement interviews and her grand-jury testimony. He rejected the defense argument that questions about visibility, intoxication or reliability rendered her incompetent to offer the description, explaining that there was a major difference between excluding a witness altogether and allowing the defense to attack that witness through vigorous cross-examination. Hippler ultimately ruled that it was the jury’s responsibility to decide how much weight to give Mortensen’s description and whether Kohberger was the masked man she saw, meaning the defense would have been free to challenge the “bushy eyebrows” identification at trial but could not erase it from the prosecution’s case beforehand.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2937bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-the-attempt-to-use-his-autism-as-a-defense-9-9-26--75002322
The judge made clear that questions about Kohberger’s mental health, including any evidence of autism, must be reserved for trial and possible sentencing proceedings—not pretrial motions. He stated that ruling otherwise would require him to make findings of fact not appropriate at this phase and reiterated that the law demands that a jury, not the court alone, determine any mitigating factors after conviction. Thus, Kohberger remains eligible for the death penalty as the case proceeds toward trial.


to  contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

042425+Order+on+Defendants+Motion+to+Strike+Death+Penalty+RE+Autism+Spectrum+Disorder.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75002322Wed, 09 Sep 2026 08:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJudge John Judge issued an order denying Bryan Kohberger’s motion to strike the death penalty on the grounds that he may have Autism Spectrum Disorder. Kohberger’s defense team argued that his possible diagnosis made him categorically ineligible for...
The judge made clear that questions about Kohberger’s mental health, including any evidence of autism, must be reserved for trial and possible sentencing proceedings—not pretrial motions. He stated that ruling otherwise would require him to make findings of fact not appropriate at this phase and reiterated that the law demands that a jury, not the court alone, determine any mitigating factors after conviction. Thus, Kohberger remains eligible for the death penalty as the case proceeds toward trial.


to  contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

042425+Order+on+Defendants+Motion+to+Strike+Death+Penalty+RE+Autism+Spectrum+Disorder.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3199bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-downfall-of-jes-staley-9-9-26--75002527Jes Staley’s fall from the highest levels of global banking was extraordinary because so much of it ultimately traced back to his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Staley spent decades climbing through JPMorgan, eventually running its investment bank and becoming one of Wall Street’s most powerful executives before taking over as chief executive of Barclays in 2015. But Epstein followed him into that job. Regulators investigating the relationship discovered that Staley had portrayed Epstein as little more than a professional contact when their correspondence told a very different story: Staley had described Epstein as one of his “deepest” and “most cherished” friends, visited his properties, remained in contact with him far later than initially represented and exchanged hundreds of messages with him. The pressure eventually became untenable, and Staley resigned from Barclays in 2021 after regulators reached preliminary conclusions about how he had characterized the relationship. In 2025, the British Upper Tribunal upheld the Financial Conduct Authority’s finding that Staley had recklessly approved misleading statements about Epstein, leaving him permanently barred from senior management positions in the British financial industry and fined £1.1 million.

The collapse became even more dramatic as the Epstein litigation and congressional investigation exposed details that made Staley’s earlier descriptions of the relationship increasingly difficult to square with the documentary record. JPMorgan accused its former executive of acting as Epstein’s internal champion while Epstein remained a client, and Staley later acknowledged to Congress that he had shared confidential and potentially market-sensitive JPMorgan information with Epstein, including information concerning the bank’s communications with the Federal Reserve during the 2008 financial crisis, prospective transactions and his own compensation. He also disclosed that Epstein had at one point named him as a trustee of his estate after Epstein’s 2008 conviction, although Staley said he declined the role. Staley has consistently maintained that he did not know about Epstein’s trafficking and abuse, but by 2026 his legacy had been transformed: a man who once ran Barclays and occupied the uppermost tier of international finance was banned from senior roles, stripped of deferred compensation, fighting litigation and congressional scrutiny, and repeatedly forced to explain why his relationship with one of the world’s most notorious sex offenders had been substantially closer than he had originally allowed the public and regulators to believe.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75002527Wed, 09 Sep 2026 06:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJes Staley’s fall from the highest levels of global banking was extraordinary because so much of it ultimately traced back to his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Staley spent decades climbing through JPMorgan, eventually running its investment bank...Jes Staley’s fall from the highest levels of global banking was extraordinary because so much of it ultimately traced back to his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Staley spent decades climbing through JPMorgan, eventually running its investment bank and becoming one of Wall Street’s most powerful executives before taking over as chief executive of Barclays in 2015. But Epstein followed him into that job. Regulators investigating the relationship discovered that Staley had portrayed Epstein as little more than a professional contact when their correspondence told a very different story: Staley had described Epstein as one of his “deepest” and “most cherished” friends, visited his properties, remained in contact with him far later than initially represented and exchanged hundreds of messages with him. The pressure eventually became untenable, and Staley resigned from Barclays in 2021 after regulators reached preliminary conclusions about how he had characterized the relationship. In 2025, the British Upper Tribunal upheld the Financial Conduct Authority’s finding that Staley had recklessly approved misleading statements about Epstein, leaving him permanently barred from senior management positions in the British financial industry and fined £1.1 million.

The collapse became even more dramatic as the Epstein litigation and congressional investigation exposed details that made Staley’s earlier descriptions of the relationship increasingly difficult to square with the documentary record. JPMorgan accused its former executive of acting as Epstein’s internal champion while Epstein remained a client, and Staley later acknowledged to Congress that he had shared confidential and potentially market-sensitive JPMorgan information with Epstein, including information concerning the bank’s communications with the Federal Reserve during the 2008 financial crisis, prospective transactions and his own compensation. He also disclosed that Epstein had at one point named him as a trustee of his estate after Epstein’s 2008 conviction, although Staley said he declined the role. Staley has consistently maintained that he did not know about Epstein’s trafficking and abuse, but by 2026 his legacy had been transformed: a man who once ran Barclays and occupied the uppermost tier of international finance was banned from senior roles, stripped of deferred compensation, fighting litigation and congressional scrutiny, and repeatedly forced to explain why his relationship with one of the world’s most notorious sex offenders had been substantially closer than he had originally allowed the public and regulators to believe.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2846bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-bryan-kohberger-madison-mogen-and-the-motive-for-murder--75002827
The second half of the book zeroes in on Bryan Kohberger, the man who ultimately pleaded guilty to the murders. Patterson paints a chilling profile of a socially alienated criminology student who studied the psychology of killers and believed he could execute the perfect crime. The narrative follows how Kohberger’s mistakes—especially leaving behind a knife sheath—led to a meticulous investigation that unraveled his plan. Combining investigative detail with fast-paced storytelling, the book challenges readers to weigh the evidence for themselves, positioning them as the jury in a case that still echoes with unanswered questions and shattered lives.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

New book on University of Idaho murders sheds light on Bryan Kohberger's potential motive - ABC News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75002827Wed, 09 Sep 2026 04:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJames Patterson’s new book, The Idaho Four: An American Tragedy, offers a detailed and emotionally charged narrative of the 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students—Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin. The book...
The second half of the book zeroes in on Bryan Kohberger, the man who ultimately pleaded guilty to the murders. Patterson paints a chilling profile of a socially alienated criminology student who studied the psychology of killers and believed he could execute the perfect crime. The narrative follows how Kohberger’s mistakes—especially leaving behind a knife sheath—led to a meticulous investigation that unraveled his plan. Combining investigative detail with fast-paced storytelling, the book challenges readers to weigh the evidence for themselves, positioning them as the jury in a case that still echoes with unanswered questions and shattered lives.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

New book on University of Idaho murders sheds light on Bryan Kohberger's potential motive - ABC News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>726bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-a-trip-around-the-headlines-in-moscow-on-november-22nd-2022--75002826
The house itself quickly became one of the most important pieces of evidence in the investigation. Police spent weeks processing the property, collecting biological and physical evidence, photographing the rooms and trying to reconstruct the attacker’s movements through the building. Officials said the victims had been found on the second and third floors in what authorities described as a bloody crime scene, while investigators searched for a large fixed-blade knife believed to have been used in the killings. Even as police began wrapping up the initial crime-scene work at the end of November 2022, no suspect had been publicly identified and the murder weapon remained missing. The result was a deeply unsettling picture at the time: investigators had an enormous physical crime scene filled with evidence, but they still had not publicly explained who had entered the house, how the attacker had navigated it, why those four students had been targeted or how the killer had managed to leave without being caught.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75002826Wed, 09 Sep 2026 02:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn the days after the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, attention increasingly centered on the unusual layout of the three-story King Road house and how an attacker could have moved through it without...
The house itself quickly became one of the most important pieces of evidence in the investigation. Police spent weeks processing the property, collecting biological and physical evidence, photographing the rooms and trying to reconstruct the attacker’s movements through the building. Officials said the victims had been found on the second and third floors in what authorities described as a bloody crime scene, while investigators searched for a large fixed-blade knife believed to have been used in the killings. Even as police began wrapping up the initial crime-scene work at the end of November 2022, no suspect had been publicly identified and the murder weapon remained missing. The result was a deeply unsettling picture at the time: investigators had an enormous physical crime scene filled with evidence, but they still had not publicly explained who had entered the house, how the attacker had navigated it, why those four students had been targeted or how the killer had managed to leave without being caught.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1085epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/ethics-controversy-engulfs-the-chair-of-new-mexico-s-epstein-commission-9-8-26--74999285
The controversy intensified after Romero’s defense of herself was distributed through Dini von Mueffling Communications, a New York public-relations firm under contract with the Epstein commission for as much as $60,000. New Mexico Senate Minority Leader Bill Sharer accused Romero of using a taxpayer-funded contractor hired for the Epstein investigation to manage her personal political crisis, calling it potential self-dealing and asking the State Ethics Commission to investigate. Sharer went further and called on Romero to resign both from the Epstein commission and from the Legislature. The episode is particularly damaging for a commission built around exposing institutional failures, conflicts and abuses of power surrounding Jeffrey Epstein, because its chair is now being forced to answer questions about her own judgment, outside employment and use of commission resources. Romero and the public-relations firm did not respond to requests for comment in the reporting, while the controversy has added another layer of political turmoil to an investigation that was supposed to be focused squarely on what happened at Epstein’s Zorro Ranch and who failed to stop it.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Calls grow for state lawmaker to resign from Epstein commission amid ethics controversy - KOB 4

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74999285Wed, 09 Sep 2026 00:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciNew Mexico state Rep. Andrea Romero, the Democratic chair of the state’s Epstein Survivors Truth Commission, is facing growing calls to step aside amid an ethics controversy involving her outside employment and the commission’s own resources....
The controversy intensified after Romero’s defense of herself was distributed through Dini von Mueffling Communications, a New York public-relations firm under contract with the Epstein commission for as much as $60,000. New Mexico Senate Minority Leader Bill Sharer accused Romero of using a taxpayer-funded contractor hired for the Epstein investigation to manage her personal political crisis, calling it potential self-dealing and asking the State Ethics Commission to investigate. Sharer went further and called on Romero to resign both from the Epstein commission and from the Legislature. The episode is particularly damaging for a commission built around exposing institutional failures, conflicts and abuses of power surrounding Jeffrey Epstein, because its chair is now being forced to answer questions about her own judgment, outside employment and use of commission resources. Romero and the public-relations firm did not respond to requests for comment in the reporting, while the controversy has added another layer of political turmoil to an investigation that was supposed to be focused squarely on what happened at Epstein’s Zorro Ranch and who failed to stop it.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Calls grow for state lawmaker to resign from Epstein commission amid ethics controversy - KOB 4

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>833epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/dani-bensky-on-jeffrey-epstein-the-fbi-and-a-system-that-failed-9-8-26--74999288
Bensky was especially critical of the Justice Department’s handling of the massive Epstein document release, saying that millions of pages have been made public without producing new investigations or charges while survivors’ private information has repeatedly been exposed. She said her own identifying information appeared publicly multiple times, while the names of some people connected to Epstein remained redacted, calling the government’s conduct another form of harm against the people it was supposed to protect. Bensky also said the issue should not be treated as partisan, arguing that both Republicans and Democrats need to recognize it as a human-rights and accountability matter. She questioned why, after years of investigations, document releases and congressional scrutiny, Ghislaine Maxwell remains the only Epstein associate imprisoned in connection with the trafficking operation. For Bensky, the central failure is not simply what Epstein did, but how thoroughly institutions continue to protect themselves while survivors are forced to keep fighting for answers, transparency and access to justice.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Dani Bensky, Epstein survivor: ‘The United States has failed spectacularly in this case’ | U.S. | EL PAÍS English

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74999288Tue, 08 Sep 2026 22:30:03 +0000Bobby CapucciDani Bensky, who says Jeffrey Epstein abused her beginning when she was 17, described the Epstein case as a spectacular institutional failure by the United States, arguing that the government has repeatedly failed survivors while allowing powerful...
Bensky was especially critical of the Justice Department’s handling of the massive Epstein document release, saying that millions of pages have been made public without producing new investigations or charges while survivors’ private information has repeatedly been exposed. She said her own identifying information appeared publicly multiple times, while the names of some people connected to Epstein remained redacted, calling the government’s conduct another form of harm against the people it was supposed to protect. Bensky also said the issue should not be treated as partisan, arguing that both Republicans and Democrats need to recognize it as a human-rights and accountability matter. She questioned why, after years of investigations, document releases and congressional scrutiny, Ghislaine Maxwell remains the only Epstein associate imprisoned in connection with the trafficking operation. For Bensky, the central failure is not simply what Epstein did, but how thoroughly institutions continue to protect themselves while survivors are forced to keep fighting for answers, transparency and access to justice.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Dani Bensky, Epstein survivor: ‘The United States has failed spectacularly in this case’ | U.S. | EL PAÍS English

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>734epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/jes-staley-and-the-transcripts-from-his-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-15-9-8-26--74999290
The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein’s cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley’s professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.


to contact me:


bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74999290Tue, 08 Sep 2026 20:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe transcripts from Jes Staley’s July 24, 2026 interview with the House Oversight Committee revealed just how deep and personal his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein became, while also exposing contradictions in the way Staley had described that...
The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein’s cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley’s professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.


to contact me:


bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>752epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/jes-staley-and-the-transcripts-from-his-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-14-9-8-26--74999286
The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein’s cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley’s professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.


to contact me:


bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74999286Tue, 08 Sep 2026 18:30:04 +0000Bobby CapucciThe transcripts from Jes Staley’s July 24, 2026 interview with the House Oversight Committee revealed just how deep and personal his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein became, while also exposing contradictions in the way Staley had described that...
The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein’s cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley’s professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.


to contact me:


bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>749epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/bryan-kohberger-gets-new-october-court-date-in-bid-to-undo-guilty-plea-9-8-26--75000820Bryan Kohberger is scheduled to return to court on October 15, 2026, as his new legal team continues trying to undo the guilty plea that sent him to prison for the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. The October hearing is expected to focus on the defense effort to disqualify Judge Steven Hippler from presiding over Kohberger’s post-conviction case. Hippler sentenced Kohberger in July 2025 to four consecutive life terms without parole after Kohberger admitted killing the four University of Idaho students as part of a plea agreement that removed the death penalty. Kohberger is now claiming in a handwritten affidavit that his former attorneys misled both him and his family about the strength of the prosecution’s evidence and pressured him into accepting a plea he says was not voluntary. His current lawyers argue that Hippler’s comments at sentencing and prior involvement in the case create questions about whether he can impartially decide claims attacking the validity of the plea he previously accepted.

The October proceeding is only one part of a much larger post-conviction battle. Hippler has also scheduled an evidentiary hearing for June 17, 2027, where Kohberger will have the opportunity to try to prove claims including ineffective assistance of counsel and coercion surrounding his guilty plea. Prosecutors are asking the court to dismiss the petition, pointing to Kohberger’s repeated admissions of guilt, including the written plea agreement and his statements under oath during the 2025 plea hearing that he understood the agreement and was pleading guilty voluntarily. Kohberger’s attorneys are also seeking to move the post-conviction proceedings from Ada County back to Latah County, arguing that the reasons for moving the original capital trial to Boise no longer apply. If Kohberger somehow succeeds in vacating his convictions and withdrawing his plea, the original murder charges could return and prosecutors could potentially pursue the death penalty again, making his attempt to escape four life sentences a legal gamble with enormous consequences.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Bryan Kohberger gets court date in push to overturn plea deal in University of Idaho murders









Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/75000820Tue, 08 Sep 2026 16:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBryan Kohberger is scheduled to return to court on October 15, 2026, as his new legal team continues trying to undo the guilty plea that sent him to prison for the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. The October...Bryan Kohberger is scheduled to return to court on October 15, 2026, as his new legal team continues trying to undo the guilty plea that sent him to prison for the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. The October hearing is expected to focus on the defense effort to disqualify Judge Steven Hippler from presiding over Kohberger’s post-conviction case. Hippler sentenced Kohberger in July 2025 to four consecutive life terms without parole after Kohberger admitted killing the four University of Idaho students as part of a plea agreement that removed the death penalty. Kohberger is now claiming in a handwritten affidavit that his former attorneys misled both him and his family about the strength of the prosecution’s evidence and pressured him into accepting a plea he says was not voluntary. His current lawyers argue that Hippler’s comments at sentencing and prior involvement in the case create questions about whether he can impartially decide claims attacking the validity of the plea he previously accepted.

The October proceeding is only one part of a much larger post-conviction battle. Hippler has also scheduled an evidentiary hearing for June 17, 2027, where Kohberger will have the opportunity to try to prove claims including ineffective assistance of counsel and coercion surrounding his guilty plea. Prosecutors are asking the court to dismiss the petition, pointing to Kohberger’s repeated admissions of guilt, including the written plea agreement and his statements under oath during the 2025 plea hearing that he understood the agreement and was pleading guilty voluntarily. Kohberger’s attorneys are also seeking to move the post-conviction proceedings from Ada County back to Latah County, arguing that the reasons for moving the original capital trial to Boise no longer apply. If Kohberger somehow succeeds in vacating his convictions and withdrawing his plea, the original murder charges could return and prosecutors could potentially pursue the death penalty again, making his attempt to escape four life sentences a legal gamble with enormous consequences.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Bryan Kohberger gets court date in push to overturn plea deal in University of Idaho murders









Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>636bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/lori-vallow-lindsay-clancy-and-when-diagnosis-collides-with-criminal-responsibility-9-8-26--74999287
That distinction exposes the weakness in treating a psychiatric diagnosis as a substitute for a legal analysis of culpability. Criminal law does not generally ask only whether a defendant was mentally ill; it asks how that illness affected the specific capacities relevant to the charged crime, including intent, knowledge and, where applicable, the ability to appreciate wrongfulness. Vallow demonstrates why that line matters. A defendant can suffer from extraordinary delusions while still planning, lying, concealing evidence or acting in ways designed to avoid detection. The broader the argument becomes that mental illness itself equals innocence, the harder it becomes to explain why the same logic should not protect defendants like Vallow. The reductio is therefore straightforward: either mental illness must be evaluated through a demanding, fact-specific legal standard, or the principle becomes so expansive that it can be used to excuse virtually any horrific act committed by someone with a serious psychiatric disorder.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74999287Tue, 08 Sep 2026 14:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe Lori Vallow case provides a stark test of the argument that severe mental illness should, by itself, substantially diminish or erase criminal responsibility for the killing of children. Vallow embraced an elaborate delusional worldview involving...
That distinction exposes the weakness in treating a psychiatric diagnosis as a substitute for a legal analysis of culpability. Criminal law does not generally ask only whether a defendant was mentally ill; it asks how that illness affected the specific capacities relevant to the charged crime, including intent, knowledge and, where applicable, the ability to appreciate wrongfulness. Vallow demonstrates why that line matters. A defendant can suffer from extraordinary delusions while still planning, lying, concealing evidence or acting in ways designed to avoid detection. The broader the argument becomes that mental illness itself equals innocence, the harder it becomes to explain why the same logic should not protect defendants like Vallow. The reductio is therefore straightforward: either mental illness must be evaluated through a demanding, fact-specific legal standard, or the principle becomes so expansive that it can be used to excuse virtually any horrific act committed by someone with a serious psychiatric disorder.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1393clancytrial,courtroomnews,criminalresponsibility,duxburymurders,duxburytragedy,insanitydefense,lindsayclancy,lindsayclancycase,lindsayclancynews,lindsayclancytrial,lindsayclancyupdates,maternalmentalhealth,murdertrial,postpartummentalhealth,postpartumpsychosis,trialupdates,truecrime,truecrimecommunity,truecrimenews,truecrimepodcasttruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/new-documentary-reopens-questions-about-jeffrey-epstein-s-death-9-8-26--74999289
Forensic pathologist Michael Baden, who observed Epstein’s autopsy on behalf of Epstein’s brother, again focused on the physical evidence he believes makes the suicide ruling questionable. Baden pointed to what he described as a horizontal ligature mark and three fractures in Epstein’s neck, including two fractures of the thyroid cartilage and one of the hyoid bone, injuries he said were more consistent in his experience with homicidal strangulation than suicidal hanging. Other forensic experts have disputed the significance of those findings and noted that such fractures can occur in hangings, particularly in older individuals, so Baden’s interpretation does not establish that Epstein was murdered. Epstein’s brother Mark nevertheless told the documentary that he believes Jeffrey was killed and that a more serious investigation could determine what happened. The documentary therefore does not overturn the official finding of suicide, but it assembles the medical questions, Epstein’s reported statements before his death and the spectacular breakdown of jail procedures into a renewed challenge to an explanation that has never satisfied a large portion of the public.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

The evidence Epstein did NOT kill himself: Lawyer and pathologist reveal details they claim indicate the paedophile WAS murdered in jail in new documentary | Daily Mail Online

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74999289Tue, 08 Sep 2026 12:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciA new ABC documentary revisits Jeffrey Epstein’s August 2019 death at the Metropolitan Correctional Center and gives substantial attention to people who reject or question the official ruling of suicide by hanging. Epstein lawyer David Schoen said...
Forensic pathologist Michael Baden, who observed Epstein’s autopsy on behalf of Epstein’s brother, again focused on the physical evidence he believes makes the suicide ruling questionable. Baden pointed to what he described as a horizontal ligature mark and three fractures in Epstein’s neck, including two fractures of the thyroid cartilage and one of the hyoid bone, injuries he said were more consistent in his experience with homicidal strangulation than suicidal hanging. Other forensic experts have disputed the significance of those findings and noted that such fractures can occur in hangings, particularly in older individuals, so Baden’s interpretation does not establish that Epstein was murdered. Epstein’s brother Mark nevertheless told the documentary that he believes Jeffrey was killed and that a more serious investigation could determine what happened. The documentary therefore does not overturn the official finding of suicide, but it assembles the medical questions, Epstein’s reported statements before his death and the spectacular breakdown of jail procedures into a renewed challenge to an explanation that has never satisfied a large portion of the public.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

The evidence Epstein did NOT kill himself: Lawyer and pathologist reveal details they claim indicate the paedophile WAS murdered in jail in new documentary | Daily Mail Online

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1222epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-his-demeanor-in-the-days-after-the-murders-9-8-26--74976003In the hours and days after the November 13, 2022 murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, people who encountered Bryan Kohberger at Washington State University later described behavior that, in hindsight, struck them as noticeably different. Students said Kohberger, normally an active participant in criminology discussions, became conspicuously quiet when the Moscow murders were discussed. One classmate told investigators that he stopped bringing his cellphone to class and instead used his laptop, while others remembered him appearing increasingly preoccupied, unkempt and disheveled, with facial hair growing in where he had previously been clean-shaven. Some witnesses also reported seeing scratches, cuts or bandaging on his hands around the period of the killings, although accounts differed about precisely when those injuries were observed and none of those observations, by themselves, established how the injuries occurred.

His behavior as a teaching assistant also appeared to shift dramatically after the murders. Students who had previously complained that Kohberger graded harshly and aggressively defended his decisions said he suddenly began handing out extremely high grades, often giving students near-perfect scores without the detailed comments he had previously provided. One student described him as increasingly distracted and said his apparent mental preoccupation reached an “all-time high” after the killings. Other accounts were not entirely consistent: while some classmates remembered him becoming quieter and more withdrawn, another person told investigators that Kohberger began talking considerably more than usual and seemed as though he wanted to vent. None of those behavioral changes proved involvement in the murders, but after Kohberger emerged as the suspect, investigators interviewed the people around him extensively, and seemingly ordinary observations from the days and weeks after the killings became part of the broader effort to reconstruct his movements, appearance and state of mind immediately following the crime.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74976003Tue, 08 Sep 2026 10:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn the hours and days after the November 13, 2022 murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, people who encountered Bryan Kohberger at Washington State University later described behavior that, in hindsight, struck...In the hours and days after the November 13, 2022 murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, people who encountered Bryan Kohberger at Washington State University later described behavior that, in hindsight, struck them as noticeably different. Students said Kohberger, normally an active participant in criminology discussions, became conspicuously quiet when the Moscow murders were discussed. One classmate told investigators that he stopped bringing his cellphone to class and instead used his laptop, while others remembered him appearing increasingly preoccupied, unkempt and disheveled, with facial hair growing in where he had previously been clean-shaven. Some witnesses also reported seeing scratches, cuts or bandaging on his hands around the period of the killings, although accounts differed about precisely when those injuries were observed and none of those observations, by themselves, established how the injuries occurred.

His behavior as a teaching assistant also appeared to shift dramatically after the murders. Students who had previously complained that Kohberger graded harshly and aggressively defended his decisions said he suddenly began handing out extremely high grades, often giving students near-perfect scores without the detailed comments he had previously provided. One student described him as increasingly distracted and said his apparent mental preoccupation reached an “all-time high” after the killings. Other accounts were not entirely consistent: while some classmates remembered him becoming quieter and more withdrawn, another person told investigators that Kohberger began talking considerably more than usual and seemed as though he wanted to vent. None of those behavioral changes proved involvement in the murders, but after Kohberger emerged as the suspect, investigators interviewed the people around him extensively, and seemingly ordinary observations from the days and weeks after the killings became part of the broader effort to reconstruct his movements, appearance and state of mind immediately following the crime.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2692bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-s-legal-team-and-the-push-to-change-the-narrative-9-8-26--74976004
Prosecutors consistently pushed back against the suggestion that they were deliberately hiding evidence, maintaining that they had turned over an enormous volume of material and continued supplementing discovery as information arrived from police agencies, laboratories, experts and outside entities. Some disputed material, the state argued, either was not yet in its possession, did not exist or fell outside what prosecutors believed they were legally required to disclose. Judge John Judge was repeatedly forced to referee the dispute, with some issues resolved through agreements between the parties and others requiring court rulings. The argument resurfaced again as the case moved toward trial, particularly over expert disclosures, with the defense complaining that prosecutors had identified numerous experts without providing complete reports or opinions, including in areas involving DNA and digital forensics. The result was a years-long tug of war in which the defense portrayed the discovery process as a threat to Kohberger’s ability to prepare a fair defense, while the state characterized the delays and disputes as the unavoidable product of an enormous, multi-agency murder investigation rather than evidence of a deliberate effort to conceal information.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74976004Tue, 08 Sep 2026 08:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe Bryan Kohberger case became consumed by a prolonged discovery fight as his defense team repeatedly accused prosecutors of failing to turn over evidence completely, promptly or in a usable form. Anne Taylor and her team filed multiple motions to...
Prosecutors consistently pushed back against the suggestion that they were deliberately hiding evidence, maintaining that they had turned over an enormous volume of material and continued supplementing discovery as information arrived from police agencies, laboratories, experts and outside entities. Some disputed material, the state argued, either was not yet in its possession, did not exist or fell outside what prosecutors believed they were legally required to disclose. Judge John Judge was repeatedly forced to referee the dispute, with some issues resolved through agreements between the parties and others requiring court rulings. The argument resurfaced again as the case moved toward trial, particularly over expert disclosures, with the defense complaining that prosecutors had identified numerous experts without providing complete reports or opinions, including in areas involving DNA and digital forensics. The result was a years-long tug of war in which the defense portrayed the discovery process as a threat to Kohberger’s ability to prepare a fair defense, while the state characterized the delays and disputes as the unavoidable product of an enormous, multi-agency murder investigation rather than evidence of a deliberate effort to conceal information.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2719bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-and-his-relationship-with-reid-hoffman-and-sergey-bryn-9-7-26--74976169Jeffrey Epstein’s relationships with Sergey Brin and Reid Hoffman appear to have been considerably more substantial than the early public picture suggested. Brin, the Google co-founder, had long been known primarily as someone who visited Little Saint James with his then-fiancée Anne Wojcicki in 2007, but newly released Epstein records indicate the relationship stretched back further. Emails suggest Brin was already socializing at Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse as early as 2003, and his name appears hundreds of times in the broader Epstein document releases. Sarah Ransome later alleged that she encountered Brin and Wojcicki during their 2007 island visit, and 2026 reporting on the newly released files described that trip as part of a much larger pattern of Epstein cultivating Silicon Valley figures rather than an isolated encounter. Brin has not been accused of participating in Epstein’s crimes, but the newer records complicate the idea that his connection amounted to little more than a single visit to the island.

Hoffman’s relationship is even more extensively documented. The LinkedIn co-founder initially described his interactions with Epstein as a limited consequence of helping MIT Media Lab director Joi Ito with fundraising, but records show repeated meetings and communications after Epstein’s 2008 conviction. Hoffman met Epstein at MIT in 2013, corresponded with him directly, entertained invitations to Epstein’s New Mexico ranch, visited Little Saint James with Ito in 2014, and later hosted a 2015 Silicon Valley dinner attended by Epstein and other technology figures. Documents also show Epstein arranging accommodations and meetings for Hoffman, while newer releases include thousands of references to Hoffman and indicate continued personal familiarity beyond a single fundraising encounter. Hoffman himself later acknowledged that by associating with Epstein he helped rehabilitate Epstein’s reputation and perpetuate injustice. So in both Brin’s and Hoffman’s cases, the expanding documentary record has transformed the story from occasional proximity to a much more sustained place inside Epstein’s technology and science network, particularly with Hoffman, whose contact continued for years after Epstein was already a convicted sex offender.


to contat me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74976169Tue, 08 Sep 2026 06:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJeffrey Epstein’s relationships with Sergey Brin and Reid Hoffman appear to have been considerably more substantial than the early public picture suggested. Brin, the Google co-founder, had long been known primarily as someone who visited Little Saint...Jeffrey Epstein’s relationships with Sergey Brin and Reid Hoffman appear to have been considerably more substantial than the early public picture suggested. Brin, the Google co-founder, had long been known primarily as someone who visited Little Saint James with his then-fiancée Anne Wojcicki in 2007, but newly released Epstein records indicate the relationship stretched back further. Emails suggest Brin was already socializing at Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse as early as 2003, and his name appears hundreds of times in the broader Epstein document releases. Sarah Ransome later alleged that she encountered Brin and Wojcicki during their 2007 island visit, and 2026 reporting on the newly released files described that trip as part of a much larger pattern of Epstein cultivating Silicon Valley figures rather than an isolated encounter. Brin has not been accused of participating in Epstein’s crimes, but the newer records complicate the idea that his connection amounted to little more than a single visit to the island.

Hoffman’s relationship is even more extensively documented. The LinkedIn co-founder initially described his interactions with Epstein as a limited consequence of helping MIT Media Lab director Joi Ito with fundraising, but records show repeated meetings and communications after Epstein’s 2008 conviction. Hoffman met Epstein at MIT in 2013, corresponded with him directly, entertained invitations to Epstein’s New Mexico ranch, visited Little Saint James with Ito in 2014, and later hosted a 2015 Silicon Valley dinner attended by Epstein and other technology figures. Documents also show Epstein arranging accommodations and meetings for Hoffman, while newer releases include thousands of references to Hoffman and indicate continued personal familiarity beyond a single fundraising encounter. Hoffman himself later acknowledged that by associating with Epstein he helped rehabilitate Epstein’s reputation and perpetuate injustice. So in both Brin’s and Hoffman’s cases, the expanding documentary record has transformed the story from occasional proximity to a much more sustained place inside Epstein’s technology and science network, particularly with Hoffman, whose contact continued for years after Epstein was already a convicted sex offender.


to contat me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3160epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-touch-dna-and-how-it-s-used-to-solve-crimes--74974587Touch DNA refers to the small amounts of genetic material people can leave behind simply by handling or coming into contact with an object. Unlike blood, saliva or semen, touch DNA usually comes from microscopic skin cells and other biological material deposited on surfaces such as weapons, clothing, door handles, steering wheels, phones or items moved during a crime. Investigators collect those samples by swabbing or otherwise processing areas where a person is likely to have touched something, and forensic laboratories then attempt to develop a DNA profile from the material. Because modern testing can detect extremely small quantities of DNA, touch DNA has become an important tool in cases where there is no obvious biological evidence at the scene.

At the same time, touch DNA can be more complicated to interpret than a traditional blood or saliva sample because finding someone’s DNA on an object does not necessarily prove when, how or why it got there. DNA can sometimes be transferred indirectly, mixtures from multiple people are common, and the amount of material recovered may be very small or incomplete. That means investigators have to evaluate touch DNA alongside the rest of the evidence, including where the sample was found, who had access to the object, whether the person had an innocent reason to handle it and what other physical or digital evidence shows. In criminal investigations, touch DNA can help link a suspect to an object or location or exclude someone from consideration, but its real significance depends heavily on the circumstances surrounding the sample rather than the laboratory result alone.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74974587Tue, 08 Sep 2026 04:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciTouch DNA refers to the small amounts of genetic material people can leave behind simply by handling or coming into contact with an object. Unlike blood, saliva or semen, touch DNA usually comes from microscopic skin cells and other biological...Touch DNA refers to the small amounts of genetic material people can leave behind simply by handling or coming into contact with an object. Unlike blood, saliva or semen, touch DNA usually comes from microscopic skin cells and other biological material deposited on surfaces such as weapons, clothing, door handles, steering wheels, phones or items moved during a crime. Investigators collect those samples by swabbing or otherwise processing areas where a person is likely to have touched something, and forensic laboratories then attempt to develop a DNA profile from the material. Because modern testing can detect extremely small quantities of DNA, touch DNA has become an important tool in cases where there is no obvious biological evidence at the scene.

At the same time, touch DNA can be more complicated to interpret than a traditional blood or saliva sample because finding someone’s DNA on an object does not necessarily prove when, how or why it got there. DNA can sometimes be transferred indirectly, mixtures from multiple people are common, and the amount of material recovered may be very small or incomplete. That means investigators have to evaluate touch DNA alongside the rest of the evidence, including where the sample was found, who had access to the object, whether the person had an innocent reason to handle it and what other physical or digital evidence shows. In criminal investigations, touch DNA can help link a suspect to an object or location or exclude someone from consideration, but its real significance depends heavily on the circumstances surrounding the sample rather than the laboratory result alone.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>426bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-a-beginners-guide-to-how-dna-is-used-in-investigations--74974586
DNA evidence can help identify a suspect, exclude an innocent person, connect crimes committed in different places or strengthen other evidence already developed in an investigation, but it does not automatically explain how or when biological material arrived at a scene. A match can establish that DNA is consistent with coming from a particular person to an extraordinarily high statistical degree, yet investigators still have to determine what that finding means in the context of the case. DNA can be transferred directly or indirectly, mixtures may contain material from several people, samples can degrade, and contamination or improper handling can complicate interpretation. That is why forensic DNA evidence is generally considered most powerful when it is evaluated alongside witness accounts, digital evidence, surveillance footage, fingerprints, timelines and other physical evidence. In criminal investigations, DNA is not a magic answer that solves a case by itself; it is a scientific tool that can dramatically narrow the field and help investigators determine who can, and sometimes just as importantly, who cannot, be connected to the evidence.

to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74974586Tue, 08 Sep 2026 02:25:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDNA, short for deoxyribonucleic acid, is the biological instruction manual found in nearly every cell of the human body, and with the exception of identical twins, each person’s DNA profile is effectively unique. For investigators, that uniqueness...
DNA evidence can help identify a suspect, exclude an innocent person, connect crimes committed in different places or strengthen other evidence already developed in an investigation, but it does not automatically explain how or when biological material arrived at a scene. A match can establish that DNA is consistent with coming from a particular person to an extraordinarily high statistical degree, yet investigators still have to determine what that finding means in the context of the case. DNA can be transferred directly or indirectly, mixtures may contain material from several people, samples can degrade, and contamination or improper handling can complicate interpretation. That is why forensic DNA evidence is generally considered most powerful when it is evaluated alongside witness accounts, digital evidence, surveillance footage, fingerprints, timelines and other physical evidence. In criminal investigations, DNA is not a magic answer that solves a case by itself; it is a scientific tool that can dramatically narrow the field and help investigators determine who can, and sometimes just as importantly, who cannot, be connected to the evidence.

to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>982bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/jes-staley-and-the-transcripts-from-his-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-13-9-7-26--74973484
The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein’s cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley’s professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.


to contact me:


bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74973484Tue, 08 Sep 2026 00:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe transcripts from Jes Staley’s July 24, 2026 interview with the House Oversight Committee revealed just how deep and personal his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein became, while also exposing contradictions in the way Staley had described that...
The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein’s cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley’s professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.


to contact me:


bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>799epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/jes-staley-and-the-transcripts-from-his-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-12-9-7-26--74973480
The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein’s cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley’s professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.


to contact me:


bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74973480Mon, 07 Sep 2026 22:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe transcripts from Jes Staley’s July 24, 2026 interview with the House Oversight Committee revealed just how deep and personal his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein became, while also exposing contradictions in the way Staley had described that...
The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein’s cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley’s professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.


to contact me:


bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>826epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/jes-staley-and-the-transcripts-from-his-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-11-9-7-26--74973482
The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein’s cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley’s professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.


to contact me:


bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74973482Mon, 07 Sep 2026 20:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe transcripts from Jes Staley’s July 24, 2026 interview with the House Oversight Committee revealed just how deep and personal his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein became, while also exposing contradictions in the way Staley had described that...
The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein’s cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley’s professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.


to contact me:


bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>782epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/jes-staley-and-the-transcripts-from-his-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-10-9-7-26--74973479
The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein’s cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley’s professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.


to contact me:


bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74973479Mon, 07 Sep 2026 18:30:04 +0000Bobby CapucciThe transcripts from Jes Staley’s July 24, 2026 interview with the House Oversight Committee revealed just how deep and personal his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein became, while also exposing contradictions in the way Staley had described that...
The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein’s cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley’s professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.


to contact me:


bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>788epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-the-experts-behind-the-case-against-bryan-kohberger-part-12-9-7-26--74973369The State’s rebuttal to defense expert Matthew Noedel focused on challenging the significance of his conclusions about the absence of victim blood or other victim-linked biological material in Bryan Kohberger’s car and residence. Noedel had emphasized that investigators conducted an extensive search of Kohberger’s vehicle and apartment and did not find blood tied to Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle or Ethan Chapin. Prosecutors responded that the absence of detectable victim blood did not establish that Kohberger had not been inside the King Road house, nor did it prove that biological material could not have been removed, degraded or simply never transferred in a recoverable quantity. The rebuttal also cautioned against treating a negative finding as affirmative proof of innocence, arguing that forensic testing can establish what was detected in a particular sample but cannot necessarily reconstruct every transfer event that did or did not occur.

The State also pushed back on Noedel’s interpretation of secondary transfer and contamination issues, arguing that his report went beyond what the laboratory results could reliably support. Prosecutors stressed that transfer of DNA or blood is highly dependent on variables such as the amount of biological material present, the surfaces involved, subsequent cleaning, time, environmental conditions and the way evidence was handled. In other words, they argued that Noedel was using the lack of victim DNA in Kohberger’s vehicle and apartment to suggest a broader exculpatory conclusion that the science itself did not require. The rebuttal was therefore less about disputing the raw laboratory results and more about disputing the inference Noedel drew from them: everyone agreed that victim blood was not found in the car or apartment, but the State argued that this fact alone did not meaningfully exclude Kohberger from the murders or undermine the prosecution’s larger evidentiary case.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

030326+REDACTED+Exhibits+S-1+through+S-13+to+States+Amended+Supp+Resp+to+Rqst+for+Disc+RE+Expert+Testimony.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74973369Mon, 07 Sep 2026 16:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe State’s rebuttal to defense expert Matthew Noedel focused on challenging the significance of his conclusions about the absence of victim blood or other victim-linked biological material in Bryan Kohberger’s car and residence. Noedel had emphasized...The State’s rebuttal to defense expert Matthew Noedel focused on challenging the significance of his conclusions about the absence of victim blood or other victim-linked biological material in Bryan Kohberger’s car and residence. Noedel had emphasized that investigators conducted an extensive search of Kohberger’s vehicle and apartment and did not find blood tied to Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle or Ethan Chapin. Prosecutors responded that the absence of detectable victim blood did not establish that Kohberger had not been inside the King Road house, nor did it prove that biological material could not have been removed, degraded or simply never transferred in a recoverable quantity. The rebuttal also cautioned against treating a negative finding as affirmative proof of innocence, arguing that forensic testing can establish what was detected in a particular sample but cannot necessarily reconstruct every transfer event that did or did not occur.

The State also pushed back on Noedel’s interpretation of secondary transfer and contamination issues, arguing that his report went beyond what the laboratory results could reliably support. Prosecutors stressed that transfer of DNA or blood is highly dependent on variables such as the amount of biological material present, the surfaces involved, subsequent cleaning, time, environmental conditions and the way evidence was handled. In other words, they argued that Noedel was using the lack of victim DNA in Kohberger’s vehicle and apartment to suggest a broader exculpatory conclusion that the science itself did not require. The rebuttal was therefore less about disputing the raw laboratory results and more about disputing the inference Noedel drew from them: everyone agreed that victim blood was not found in the car or apartment, but the State argued that this fact alone did not meaningfully exclude Kohberger from the murders or undermine the prosecution’s larger evidentiary case.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

030326+REDACTED+Exhibits+S-1+through+S-13+to+States+Amended+Supp+Resp+to+Rqst+for+Disc+RE+Expert+Testimony.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>654bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/judge-graf-and-the-order-to-bind-tyler-robinson-over-for-trial-on-all-counts-charged-part-4-9-7-26--74965023
Graf also found sufficient evidence at the preliminary-hearing stage to infer that Robinson would have been aware of those people when he allegedly fired. The judge pointed to evidence that Robinson had been at the location beforehand, that there was a clear line of sight from the southwest roof area to Kirk’s canopy and that the rifle allegedly used contained an optic. Graf stopped short of making findings about exactly what Robinson could see through the scope or calculating the probability that a bullet could have ricocheted, overpenetrated or deviated from its intended path. Instead, he ruled that the totality of the evidence was enough to satisfy the relatively low probable-cause threshold and bind Robinson over for trial. Robinson has pleaded not guilty to all seven counts, and the aggravated-murder charge remains the count carrying potential capital punishment as the case now moves into its full pretrial phase.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:


Judge's order on accused Charlie Kirk assassin Tyler Robinson published by court | Fox News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74965023Mon, 07 Sep 2026 14:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJudge Tony Graf’s newly published written order explains why Tyler Robinson will stand trial on all seven charges in the killing of Charlie Kirk and why prosecutors can continue pursuing the death penalty. The key issue on the capital...
Graf also found sufficient evidence at the preliminary-hearing stage to infer that Robinson would have been aware of those people when he allegedly fired. The judge pointed to evidence that Robinson had been at the location beforehand, that there was a clear line of sight from the southwest roof area to Kirk’s canopy and that the rifle allegedly used contained an optic. Graf stopped short of making findings about exactly what Robinson could see through the scope or calculating the probability that a bullet could have ricocheted, overpenetrated or deviated from its intended path. Instead, he ruled that the totality of the evidence was enough to satisfy the relatively low probable-cause threshold and bind Robinson over for trial. Robinson has pleaded not guilty to all seven counts, and the aggravated-murder charge remains the count carrying potential capital punishment as the case now moves into its full pretrial phase.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:


Judge's order on accused Charlie Kirk assassin Tyler Robinson published by court | Fox News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1144breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/judge-graf-and-the-order-to-bind-tyler-robinson-over-for-trial-on-all-counts-charged-part-3-9-7-26--74965022
Graf also found sufficient evidence at the preliminary-hearing stage to infer that Robinson would have been aware of those people when he allegedly fired. The judge pointed to evidence that Robinson had been at the location beforehand, that there was a clear line of sight from the southwest roof area to Kirk’s canopy and that the rifle allegedly used contained an optic. Graf stopped short of making findings about exactly what Robinson could see through the scope or calculating the probability that a bullet could have ricocheted, overpenetrated or deviated from its intended path. Instead, he ruled that the totality of the evidence was enough to satisfy the relatively low probable-cause threshold and bind Robinson over for trial. Robinson has pleaded not guilty to all seven counts, and the aggravated-murder charge remains the count carrying potential capital punishment as the case now moves into its full pretrial phase.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:


Judge's order on accused Charlie Kirk assassin Tyler Robinson published by court | Fox News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74965022Mon, 07 Sep 2026 12:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJudge Tony Graf’s newly published written order explains why Tyler Robinson will stand trial on all seven charges in the killing of Charlie Kirk and why prosecutors can continue pursuing the death penalty. The key issue on the capital...
Graf also found sufficient evidence at the preliminary-hearing stage to infer that Robinson would have been aware of those people when he allegedly fired. The judge pointed to evidence that Robinson had been at the location beforehand, that there was a clear line of sight from the southwest roof area to Kirk’s canopy and that the rifle allegedly used contained an optic. Graf stopped short of making findings about exactly what Robinson could see through the scope or calculating the probability that a bullet could have ricocheted, overpenetrated or deviated from its intended path. Instead, he ruled that the totality of the evidence was enough to satisfy the relatively low probable-cause threshold and bind Robinson over for trial. Robinson has pleaded not guilty to all seven counts, and the aggravated-murder charge remains the count carrying potential capital punishment as the case now moves into its full pretrial phase.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:


Judge's order on accused Charlie Kirk assassin Tyler Robinson published by court | Fox News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>773breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-the-extensive-forensic-work-done-at-the-house-9-7-26--74941594Investigators collected an enormous amount of biological evidence from 1122 King Road because the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin left behind an exceptionally complicated crime scene. The most consequential DNA evidence was recovered from the tan leather knife sheath found on the bed beside Mogen and Goncalves. A swab from the sheath’s button snap produced a single-source male DNA profile that investigators ultimately matched directly to Bryan Kohberger after his arrest. Before that direct comparison, the FBI used investigative genetic genealogy to develop Kohberger as a lead, and investigators later compared the sheath profile with DNA recovered from trash outside his parents’ Pennsylvania home. Additional testing of the sheath produced mixtures involving multiple people, including DNA from Goncalves and Mogen in blood found on the sheath, while several other areas contained DNA in quantities too small for meaningful comparison.

The house also contained DNA that did not belong to Kohberger or the four victims, and that evidence became an important subject for the defense. Investigators found an unidentified male blood profile on a handrail inside the house and another unidentified male blood sample on a glove discovered outside the residence. Earlier defense filings referred more broadly to unidentified male DNA recovered from the crime scene and argued that investigators had not subjected those profiles to the same type of genetic-genealogy investigation used on the sheath DNA. Prosecutors responded that the unidentified samples did not meet the FBI’s criteria for entry into CODIS and maintained that none of them undermined the evidence linking Kohberger to the sheath. The DNA picture at King Road was therefore much more complicated than the shorthand description of “Kohberger’s DNA at the scene”: investigators processed a house saturated with victim blood, mixed profiles, trace material and unidentified DNA, but the prosecution’s central forensic claim remained that Kohberger’s DNA was found on the snap of a knife sheath lying beside two of the murdered women.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com











Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74941594Mon, 07 Sep 2026 10:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciInvestigators collected an enormous amount of biological evidence from 1122 King Road because the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin left behind an exceptionally complicated crime scene. The most consequential...Investigators collected an enormous amount of biological evidence from 1122 King Road because the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin left behind an exceptionally complicated crime scene. The most consequential DNA evidence was recovered from the tan leather knife sheath found on the bed beside Mogen and Goncalves. A swab from the sheath’s button snap produced a single-source male DNA profile that investigators ultimately matched directly to Bryan Kohberger after his arrest. Before that direct comparison, the FBI used investigative genetic genealogy to develop Kohberger as a lead, and investigators later compared the sheath profile with DNA recovered from trash outside his parents’ Pennsylvania home. Additional testing of the sheath produced mixtures involving multiple people, including DNA from Goncalves and Mogen in blood found on the sheath, while several other areas contained DNA in quantities too small for meaningful comparison.

The house also contained DNA that did not belong to Kohberger or the four victims, and that evidence became an important subject for the defense. Investigators found an unidentified male blood profile on a handrail inside the house and another unidentified male blood sample on a glove discovered outside the residence. Earlier defense filings referred more broadly to unidentified male DNA recovered from the crime scene and argued that investigators had not subjected those profiles to the same type of genetic-genealogy investigation used on the sheath DNA. Prosecutors responded that the unidentified samples did not meet the FBI’s criteria for entry into CODIS and maintained that none of them undermined the evidence linking Kohberger to the sheath. The DNA picture at King Road was therefore much more complicated than the shorthand description of “Kohberger’s DNA at the scene”: investigators processed a house saturated with victim blood, mixed profiles, trace material and unidentified DNA, but the prosecution’s central forensic claim remained that Kohberger’s DNA was found on the snap of a knife sheath lying beside two of the murdered women.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com











Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2689bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-fbi-and-the-multiple-trips-to-the-house-in-moscow-9-7-26--74941593
Mortensen also told police that when she opened her door for the final time, she saw a man dressed in black with a mask covering his mouth and nose walking toward her and then past her toward the rear sliding-glass door. She described him as at least 5-foot-10, athletically built but not particularly muscular, with bushy eyebrows. She said she stood there in a “frozen shock phase” before locking herself back inside her room, and she did not claim to recognize the man. That description later became important to investigators when they compared it with Bryan Kohberger’s driver’s-license information after identifying his white Hyundai Elantra. Mortensen’s account also dramatically changed the early public understanding of the case, because police had initially allowed the impression that the surviving roommates had simply slept through the murders when, in reality, Mortensen had been awake, heard portions of the attack and encountered the man investigators believed was leaving the house.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74941593Mon, 07 Sep 2026 08:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDylan Mortensen told investigators that she had been awake inside the King Road house during the early morning hours of November 13, 2022, and heard a series of noises that initially did not make sense to her. She described hearing what she thought...
Mortensen also told police that when she opened her door for the final time, she saw a man dressed in black with a mask covering his mouth and nose walking toward her and then past her toward the rear sliding-glass door. She described him as at least 5-foot-10, athletically built but not particularly muscular, with bushy eyebrows. She said she stood there in a “frozen shock phase” before locking herself back inside her room, and she did not claim to recognize the man. That description later became important to investigators when they compared it with Bryan Kohberger’s driver’s-license information after identifying his white Hyundai Elantra. Mortensen’s account also dramatically changed the early public understanding of the case, because police had initially allowed the impression that the surviving roommates had simply slept through the murders when, in reality, Mortensen had been awake, heard portions of the attack and encountered the man investigators believed was leaving the house.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2983bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-without-jes-staley-there-is-no-jeffrey-epstein-at-jp-morgan-9-7-26--74941618Jes Staley was one of Jeffrey Epstein’s most important advocates inside JPMorgan, and the record showed that he repeatedly used his standing at the bank to defend a client who was already generating serious internal concern. Staley had a close personal relationship with Epstein, exchanged hundreds of messages with him, visited his properties and continued associating with him after Epstein’s 2008 conviction. Inside JPMorgan, Staley argued against cutting Epstein loose even as compliance officers raised concerns about suspicious cash withdrawals, payments to young women and the reputational risk of continuing the relationship. He vouched for Epstein, treated him as a valuable client and helped give him credibility within the bank at precisely the time when internal red flags were mounting. That support mattered because Staley was not some junior employee making a casual recommendation; he was one of JPMorgan’s most powerful executives, and his backing gave Epstein an influential champion inside an institution that could have decided much earlier that the relationship was no longer worth the risk.

The deeper problem was that Staley’s advocacy helped normalize Epstein inside JPMorgan long after there were reasons to question why the bank was still doing business with him. Internal communications later showed bankers discussing Epstein’s importance, his connections and the value of keeping him as a client, while compliance concerns repeatedly failed to end the relationship. Staley has denied knowing about Epstein’s ongoing abuse and has maintained that he was deceived by him, but the record showed that he actively pushed for Epstein to remain inside the bank’s ecosystem rather than simply standing by passively. In practical terms, Staley functioned as Epstein’s internal sponsor: the powerful executive who could reassure colleagues, minimize concerns and make the case that Epstein was still worth keeping. That is why his role became so central in the later JPMorgan litigation and congressional scrutiny — because Epstein did not maintain access to one of the world’s largest banks by himself; he had people inside the institution willing to argue on his behalf.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com






Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74941618Mon, 07 Sep 2026 06:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJes Staley was one of Jeffrey Epstein’s most important advocates inside JPMorgan, and the record showed that he repeatedly used his standing at the bank to defend a client who was already generating serious internal concern. Staley had a close...Jes Staley was one of Jeffrey Epstein’s most important advocates inside JPMorgan, and the record showed that he repeatedly used his standing at the bank to defend a client who was already generating serious internal concern. Staley had a close personal relationship with Epstein, exchanged hundreds of messages with him, visited his properties and continued associating with him after Epstein’s 2008 conviction. Inside JPMorgan, Staley argued against cutting Epstein loose even as compliance officers raised concerns about suspicious cash withdrawals, payments to young women and the reputational risk of continuing the relationship. He vouched for Epstein, treated him as a valuable client and helped give him credibility within the bank at precisely the time when internal red flags were mounting. That support mattered because Staley was not some junior employee making a casual recommendation; he was one of JPMorgan’s most powerful executives, and his backing gave Epstein an influential champion inside an institution that could have decided much earlier that the relationship was no longer worth the risk.

The deeper problem was that Staley’s advocacy helped normalize Epstein inside JPMorgan long after there were reasons to question why the bank was still doing business with him. Internal communications later showed bankers discussing Epstein’s importance, his connections and the value of keeping him as a client, while compliance concerns repeatedly failed to end the relationship. Staley has denied knowing about Epstein’s ongoing abuse and has maintained that he was deceived by him, but the record showed that he actively pushed for Epstein to remain inside the bank’s ecosystem rather than simply standing by passively. In practical terms, Staley functioned as Epstein’s internal sponsor: the powerful executive who could reassure colleagues, minimize concerns and make the case that Epstein was still worth keeping. That is why his role became so central in the later JPMorgan litigation and congressional scrutiny — because Epstein did not maintain access to one of the world’s largest banks by himself; he had people inside the institution willing to argue on his behalf.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com






Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3025bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-kohberger-s-legal-team-brings-aboard-a-genealogist-to-challenge-the-dna-evidence--74936849

1. DNA Testing: Individuals interested in exploring their genetic heritage and family history can submit their DNA samples through services provided by companies like AncestryDNA, 23andMe, and MyHeritageDNA. These companies analyze specific segments of the submitted DNA to identify genetic markers that are common among different populations and individuals.
2. Genetic Markers: Certain sections of the DNA, particularly those found in the Y chromosome (passed from father to son) and the mitochondrial DNA (passed from mother to all offspring), contain genetic markers that can be used to identify ancestral lineages. Autosomal DNA, which is inherited from both parents, is also examined to find matches with other individuals in the testing company's database.
3. Matching and Comparison: Testing companies compare an individual's genetic markers with those of other users in their databases. If two individuals share a significant amount of genetic material, they are considered genetic matches. The more segments of DNA they share, the closer their relationship is likely to be.
4. Building Family Trees: Genetic genealogy involves constructing family trees using a combination of traditional genealogical research and the information gained from DNA matches. By connecting with other users who share segments of DNA, individuals can extend their family trees and discover new branches of their lineage.
5. Identifying Common Ancestors: As more people participate in DNA testing, the chances of finding common ancestors increase. Overlapping segments of shared DNA can help identify specific ancestors or ancestral groups that are shared among related individuals.
6. Forensic and Investigative Applications: Genetic genealogy has also found applications in criminal investigations. Law enforcement agencies have used DNA databases to identify unknown perpetrators of crimes like murder and sexual assault. In cases where traditional investigative methods have been unsuccessful, investigators can upload DNA profiles from crime scenes to genealogy databases and identify potential relatives of the suspect based on shared genetic markers.
7. Building Family Trees for Identification: Once potential relatives of the suspect are identified, investigators work to build family trees using genealogical records, such as birth certificates, marriage records, and obituaries. By tracing the shared ancestry of these relatives, law enforcement can narrow down the list of potential suspects to a smaller pool.
8. Narrowing Down Suspects: Investigative genetic genealogy can help law enforcement focus on specific individuals who fit the profile of the unknown suspect based on age, location, and other relevant factors. This process has led to the successful identification and capture of suspects in several high-profile cases.

Bryan Kohberger's defense team has brought on Leah Larkin, a well respected genealogist to challenge the findings made by the prosecution during the DNA portion of the investigation. She will look to punch holes in the DNA evidence provided by the FBI and Moscow police and hopefully, from the defenses standpoint, provide a narrative that differs from the one presented by the prosecution.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

Bryan Kohberger update - genealogist hired by defense casts doubt on the reliability of genetic genealogy in Idaho murders investigation | Daily Mail Online


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74936849Mon, 07 Sep 2026 04:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciGenetic genealogy is a field that combines traditional genealogy research with modern DNA testing techniques to trace familial relationships and ancestry through genetic information. It involves analyzing an individual's DNA to uncover their genetic...

1. DNA Testing: Individuals interested in exploring their genetic heritage and family history can submit their DNA samples through services provided by companies like AncestryDNA, 23andMe, and MyHeritageDNA. These companies analyze specific segments of the submitted DNA to identify genetic markers that are common among different populations and individuals.
2. Genetic Markers: Certain sections of the DNA, particularly those found in the Y chromosome (passed from father to son) and the mitochondrial DNA (passed from mother to all offspring), contain genetic markers that can be used to identify ancestral lineages. Autosomal DNA, which is inherited from both parents, is also examined to find matches with other individuals in the testing company's database.
3. Matching and Comparison: Testing companies compare an individual's genetic markers with those of other users in their databases. If two individuals share a significant amount of genetic material, they are considered genetic matches. The more segments of DNA they share, the closer their relationship is likely to be.
4. Building Family Trees: Genetic genealogy involves constructing family trees using a combination of traditional genealogical research and the information gained from DNA matches. By connecting with other users who share segments of DNA, individuals can extend their family trees and discover new branches of their lineage.
5. Identifying Common Ancestors: As more people participate in DNA testing, the chances of finding common ancestors increase. Overlapping segments of shared DNA can help identify specific ancestors or ancestral groups that are shared among related individuals.
6. Forensic and Investigative Applications: Genetic genealogy has also found applications in criminal investigations. Law enforcement agencies have used DNA databases to identify unknown perpetrators of crimes like murder and sexual assault. In cases where traditional investigative methods have been unsuccessful, investigators can upload DNA profiles from crime scenes to genealogy databases and identify potential relatives of the suspect based on shared genetic markers.
7. Building Family Trees for Identification: Once potential relatives of the suspect are identified, investigators work to build family trees using genealogical records, such as birth certificates, marriage records, and obituaries. By tracing the shared ancestry of these relatives, law enforcement can narrow down the list of potential suspects to a smaller pool.
8. Narrowing Down Suspects: Investigative genetic genealogy can help law enforcement focus on specific individuals who fit the profile of the unknown suspect based on age, location, and other relevant factors. This process has led to the successful identification and capture of suspects in several high-profile cases.

Bryan Kohberger's defense team has brought on Leah Larkin, a well respected genealogist to challenge the findings made by the prosecution during the DNA portion of the investigation. She will look to punch holes in the DNA evidence provided by the FBI and Moscow police and hopefully, from the defenses standpoint, provide a narrative that differs from the one presented by the prosecution.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

950bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-the-authorities-continue-to-try-to-tie-kohberger-to-the-victims--74936848In the days after Bryan Kohberger’s arrest, one of the biggest unanswered questions was whether he had any prior connection to Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle or Ethan Chapin. Shanon Gray, an attorney representing the Goncalves family, said the family had found no evidence that any of the victims knew Kohberger before the murders, telling reporters that nobody familiar with Kaylee appeared to recognize him. That absence of an obvious relationship made the motive even more difficult to understand, especially because Kohberger lived only a short drive away in Pullman and was studying criminal justice at Washington State University. Investigators had not publicly established that he had communicated with the victims, attended social events with them or otherwise crossed paths with them before November 13, 2022.

At the same time, the probable-cause affidavit suggested that Kohberger may have been familiar with the King Road residence even if he was not personally known to the people living there. Cellphone records placed his phone in the area of the house at least 12 times before the murders, with nearly all of those occasions occurring late at night or early in the morning, and investigators believed his white Hyundai Elantra had been near the residence around the time of the killings. His DNA was also linked to a knife sheath recovered beside Madison Mogen and Kaylee Goncalves. The combination created a disturbing contradiction at that stage of the investigation: authorities were assembling evidence that Kohberger had repeatedly been near the victims’ home, yet neither the families nor the publicly released records could explain why he might have been interested in the house or the people inside it.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74936848Mon, 07 Sep 2026 02:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn the days after Bryan Kohberger’s arrest, one of the biggest unanswered questions was whether he had any prior connection to Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle or Ethan Chapin. Shanon Gray, an attorney representing the Goncalves family,...In the days after Bryan Kohberger’s arrest, one of the biggest unanswered questions was whether he had any prior connection to Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle or Ethan Chapin. Shanon Gray, an attorney representing the Goncalves family, said the family had found no evidence that any of the victims knew Kohberger before the murders, telling reporters that nobody familiar with Kaylee appeared to recognize him. That absence of an obvious relationship made the motive even more difficult to understand, especially because Kohberger lived only a short drive away in Pullman and was studying criminal justice at Washington State University. Investigators had not publicly established that he had communicated with the victims, attended social events with them or otherwise crossed paths with them before November 13, 2022.

At the same time, the probable-cause affidavit suggested that Kohberger may have been familiar with the King Road residence even if he was not personally known to the people living there. Cellphone records placed his phone in the area of the house at least 12 times before the murders, with nearly all of those occasions occurring late at night or early in the morning, and investigators believed his white Hyundai Elantra had been near the residence around the time of the killings. His DNA was also linked to a knife sheath recovered beside Madison Mogen and Kaylee Goncalves. The combination created a disturbing contradiction at that stage of the investigation: authorities were assembling evidence that Kohberger had repeatedly been near the victims’ home, yet neither the families nor the publicly released records could explain why he might have been interested in the house or the people inside it.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>721bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-bryan-kohberger-and-the-btk-killer--74936847
The connection between Rader and Kohberger had already attracted attention because Kohberger had studied criminology under Katherine Ramsland at DeSales University, and Ramsland had spent years studying and interviewing Rader before writing a book about him. Rader’s daughter, Kerri Rawson, had also spoken publicly about the Idaho case, saying she felt an unsettling familiarity while following the investigation and was stunned when she learned of Kohberger’s academic connection to Ramsland. At that stage, prosecutors had alleged that Kohberger’s DNA was found on the knife sheath recovered at the crime scene, that a white Hyundai Elantra connected to him had been captured near the house and that cellphone records placed him in the area repeatedly before the killings. Despite the strange academic link and Rader’s unsolicited commentary, there was no evidence that Kohberger and Rader had ever communicated or had any personal relationship.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74936847Mon, 07 Sep 2026 00:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBTK serial killer Dennis Rader expressed sympathy for Bryan Kohberger in early 2023 as Kohberger sat in solitary confinement at the Latah County Jail awaiting further court proceedings in the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle...
The connection between Rader and Kohberger had already attracted attention because Kohberger had studied criminology under Katherine Ramsland at DeSales University, and Ramsland had spent years studying and interviewing Rader before writing a book about him. Rader’s daughter, Kerri Rawson, had also spoken publicly about the Idaho case, saying she felt an unsettling familiarity while following the investigation and was stunned when she learned of Kohberger’s academic connection to Ramsland. At that stage, prosecutors had alleged that Kohberger’s DNA was found on the knife sheath recovered at the crime scene, that a white Hyundai Elantra connected to him had been captured near the house and that cellphone records placed him in the area repeatedly before the killings. Despite the strange academic link and Rader’s unsolicited commentary, there was no evidence that Kohberger and Rader had ever communicated or had any personal relationship.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>644bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/ghislaine-maxwell-and-the-sealed-indictment-part-2-9-6-26--74928980
Maxwell was initially charged with conspiracy to entice minors to travel for illegal sexual activity, conspiracy to transport minors for criminal sexual activity, transporting a minor with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity and two counts of perjury. The perjury charges were based on testimony she gave during a 2016 civil deposition, when she denied knowing that Epstein had possessed sex toys or engaged in sexual activity with underage girls. The indictment relied on allegations involving several unnamed victims and established the prosecution’s central theory: Maxwell had served as a recruiter, facilitator and trusted intermediary who helped Epstein create and maintain access to underage girls.

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

dl

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74928980Sun, 06 Sep 2026 22:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe sealed federal grand jury indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell, returned in June 2020 and unsealed after her arrest on July 2, accused her of helping Jeffrey Epstein identify, groom and sexually exploit girls as young as 14 between roughly 1994...
Maxwell was initially charged with conspiracy to entice minors to travel for illegal sexual activity, conspiracy to transport minors for criminal sexual activity, transporting a minor with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity and two counts of perjury. The perjury charges were based on testimony she gave during a 2016 civil deposition, when she denied knowing that Epstein had possessed sex toys or engaged in sexual activity with underage girls. The indictment relied on allegations involving several unnamed victims and established the prosecution’s central theory: Maxwell had served as a recruiter, facilitator and trusted intermediary who helped Epstein create and maintain access to underage girls.

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

dl

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>713epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/ghislaine-maxwell-and-the-sealed-indictment-part-1-9-6-26--74928979
Maxwell was initially charged with conspiracy to entice minors to travel for illegal sexual activity, conspiracy to transport minors for criminal sexual activity, transporting a minor with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity and two counts of perjury. The perjury charges were based on testimony she gave during a 2016 civil deposition, when she denied knowing that Epstein had possessed sex toys or engaged in sexual activity with underage girls. The indictment relied on allegations involving several unnamed victims and established the prosecution’s central theory: Maxwell had served as a recruiter, facilitator and trusted intermediary who helped Epstein create and maintain access to underage girls.

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

dl

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74928979Sun, 06 Sep 2026 20:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe sealed federal grand jury indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell, returned in June 2020 and unsealed after her arrest on July 2, accused her of helping Jeffrey Epstein identify, groom and sexually exploit girls as young as 14 between roughly 1994...
Maxwell was initially charged with conspiracy to entice minors to travel for illegal sexual activity, conspiracy to transport minors for criminal sexual activity, transporting a minor with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity and two counts of perjury. The perjury charges were based on testimony she gave during a 2016 civil deposition, when she denied knowing that Epstein had possessed sex toys or engaged in sexual activity with underage girls. The indictment relied on allegations involving several unnamed victims and established the prosecution’s central theory: Maxwell had served as a recruiter, facilitator and trusted intermediary who helped Epstein create and maintain access to underage girls.

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

dl

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>683epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/leon-black-and-the-motion-to-id-his-accuser-part-2-9-6-26--74926718

Black further asserts that the circumstances of the case do not meet the criteria typically justifying anonymity, such as matters involving minors or highly sensitive personal information. He maintains that the plaintiff's allegations are already public, diminishing the need for confidentiality. Black requests that the court grant his motion to amend the caption, thereby requiring the plaintiff to proceed under her real name to uphold the principles of open justice and fairness in the legal process.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.602764.144.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74926718Sun, 06 Sep 2026 18:30:04 +0000Bobby CapucciIn the case of Doe v. Black (Case No. 1:23-cv-06418), defendant Leon Black has filed a reply memorandum supporting his motion to amend the case caption to reveal the plaintiff's identity. Black argues that the plaintiff's use of a pseudonym is...

Black further asserts that the circumstances of the case do not meet the criteria typically justifying anonymity, such as matters involving minors or highly sensitive personal information. He maintains that the plaintiff's allegations are already public, diminishing the need for confidentiality. Black requests that the court grant his motion to amend the caption, thereby requiring the plaintiff to proceed under her real name to uphold the principles of open justice and fairness in the legal process.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.602764.144.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>658epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/leon-black-and-the-motion-to-id-his-accuser-part-1-9-6-26--74926719

Black further asserts that the circumstances of the case do not meet the criteria typically justifying anonymity, such as matters involving minors or highly sensitive personal information. He maintains that the plaintiff's allegations are already public, diminishing the need for confidentiality. Black requests that the court grant his motion to amend the caption, thereby requiring the plaintiff to proceed under her real name to uphold the principles of open justice and fairness in the legal process.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.602764.144.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74926719Sun, 06 Sep 2026 16:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn the case of Doe v. Black (Case No. 1:23-cv-06418), defendant Leon Black has filed a reply memorandum supporting his motion to amend the case caption to reveal the plaintiff's identity. Black argues that the plaintiff's use of a pseudonym is...

Black further asserts that the circumstances of the case do not meet the criteria typically justifying anonymity, such as matters involving minors or highly sensitive personal information. He maintains that the plaintiff's allegations are already public, diminishing the need for confidentiality. Black requests that the court grant his motion to amend the caption, thereby requiring the plaintiff to proceed under her real name to uphold the principles of open justice and fairness in the legal process.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.602764.144.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>720epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-what-did-dylan-mortensen-tell-the-police-in-the-wake-of-the-murders-9-6-26--74926577
Mortensen also told police that when she opened her door for the final time, she saw a man dressed in black with a mask covering his mouth and nose walking toward her and then past her toward the rear sliding-glass door. She described him as at least 5-foot-10, athletically built but not particularly muscular, with bushy eyebrows. She said she stood there in a “frozen shock phase” before locking herself back inside her room, and she did not claim to recognize the man. That description later became important to investigators when they compared it with Bryan Kohberger’s driver’s-license information after identifying his white Hyundai Elantra. Mortensen’s account also dramatically changed the early public understanding of the case, because police had initially allowed the impression that the surviving roommates had simply slept through the murders when, in reality, Mortensen had been awake, heard portions of the attack and encountered the man investigators believed was leaving the house.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74926577Sun, 06 Sep 2026 14:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDylan Mortensen told investigators that she had been awake inside the King Road house during the early morning hours of November 13, 2022, and heard a series of noises that initially did not make sense to her. She described hearing what she thought...
Mortensen also told police that when she opened her door for the final time, she saw a man dressed in black with a mask covering his mouth and nose walking toward her and then past her toward the rear sliding-glass door. She described him as at least 5-foot-10, athletically built but not particularly muscular, with bushy eyebrows. She said she stood there in a “frozen shock phase” before locking herself back inside her room, and she did not claim to recognize the man. That description later became important to investigators when they compared it with Bryan Kohberger’s driver’s-license information after identifying his white Hyundai Elantra. Mortensen’s account also dramatically changed the early public understanding of the case, because police had initially allowed the impression that the surviving roommates had simply slept through the murders when, in reality, Mortensen had been awake, heard portions of the attack and encountered the man investigators believed was leaving the house.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3055bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-the-motive-question-9-6-26--74926371Even after Bryan Kohberger pleaded guilty to murdering Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, the motive remained one of the biggest unanswered questions in the case. Investigators said they never established a direct relationship between Kohberger and the victims, and prosecutor Bill Thompson acknowledged there was no evidence showing that Kohberger had personally communicated with the residents of 1122 King Road. Still, Thompson said he believed either Kaylee or Madison may have been the primary target, based in part on where the attack began and the evidence suggesting Kohberger had repeatedly been in the neighborhood before the murders. Investigators also said Kohberger appeared to have deleted or sanitized material from his devices, leaving open the possibility that evidence explaining why he selected the house or one of the victims had been destroyed before police could recover it.

That vacuum produced several competing theories. Some experts and commentators focused on Kohberger’s reported difficulties with women, social rejection and complaints about his behavior and suggested that resentment, misogyny or an incel-like grievance could have played a role. Others wondered whether his intense academic interest in criminal behavior contributed to a desire to experience committing a major crime himself, essentially testing whether he could plan and execute a murder without being caught. Another theory centered on obsession with one of the women, particularly given the apparent focus on the third floor and the extreme violence inflicted on the female victims, although prosecutors never established a stalking relationship or sexual motive. Ultimately, all of those explanations remained theories rather than proven facts. Kohberger never explained why he did it, and investigators themselves conceded that he may be the only person who knows the real answer.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74926371Sun, 06 Sep 2026 12:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciEven after Bryan Kohberger pleaded guilty to murdering Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, the motive remained one of the biggest unanswered questions in the case. Investigators said they never established a direct...Even after Bryan Kohberger pleaded guilty to murdering Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, the motive remained one of the biggest unanswered questions in the case. Investigators said they never established a direct relationship between Kohberger and the victims, and prosecutor Bill Thompson acknowledged there was no evidence showing that Kohberger had personally communicated with the residents of 1122 King Road. Still, Thompson said he believed either Kaylee or Madison may have been the primary target, based in part on where the attack began and the evidence suggesting Kohberger had repeatedly been in the neighborhood before the murders. Investigators also said Kohberger appeared to have deleted or sanitized material from his devices, leaving open the possibility that evidence explaining why he selected the house or one of the victims had been destroyed before police could recover it.

That vacuum produced several competing theories. Some experts and commentators focused on Kohberger’s reported difficulties with women, social rejection and complaints about his behavior and suggested that resentment, misogyny or an incel-like grievance could have played a role. Others wondered whether his intense academic interest in criminal behavior contributed to a desire to experience committing a major crime himself, essentially testing whether he could plan and execute a murder without being caught. Another theory centered on obsession with one of the women, particularly given the apparent focus on the third floor and the extreme violence inflicted on the female victims, although prosecutors never established a stalking relationship or sexual motive. Ultimately, all of those explanations remained theories rather than proven facts. Kohberger never explained why he did it, and investigators themselves conceded that he may be the only person who knows the real answer.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3054bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-yik-yak-bank-of-america-and-apple-warrants-in-moscow-9-6-26--74926370
The Bank of America warrant showed that detectives were simultaneously examining the financial side of Kohberger’s life. It was part of a much wider sweep involving numerous banks and financial institutions, including Banner Bank, Discover, Wells Fargo, Umpqua and others, as investigators looked for transaction records that might help reconstruct purchases, travel, movements or other activity potentially relevant to the murders. The publicly available Bank of America material remained heavily restricted: Judge Megan Marshall ordered the affidavit supporting the warrant sealed and the warrant and inventory redacted because they contained highly private information and material that could endanger individuals. That means the precise transactions investigators were targeting were not fully disclosed publicly. Taken together, the Yik Yak, Apple and Bank of America warrants illustrated just how broad the post-arrest investigation became. Detectives were not simply trying to prove where Kohberger’s car or phone had been; they were digging through his social activity, cloud-based digital life and financial history to determine whether any part of that record could establish planning, contact, purchases, motive or behavior connected to the King Road murders.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74926370Sun, 06 Sep 2026 10:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciInvestigators obtained a warrant for Yik Yak because the app’s location-based, semi-anonymous format offered another way to examine Bryan Kohberger’s online activity during the months before and after the murders. The warrant sought records tied to...
The Bank of America warrant showed that detectives were simultaneously examining the financial side of Kohberger’s life. It was part of a much wider sweep involving numerous banks and financial institutions, including Banner Bank, Discover, Wells Fargo, Umpqua and others, as investigators looked for transaction records that might help reconstruct purchases, travel, movements or other activity potentially relevant to the murders. The publicly available Bank of America material remained heavily restricted: Judge Megan Marshall ordered the affidavit supporting the warrant sealed and the warrant and inventory redacted because they contained highly private information and material that could endanger individuals. That means the precise transactions investigators were targeting were not fully disclosed publicly. Taken together, the Yik Yak, Apple and Bank of America warrants illustrated just how broad the post-arrest investigation became. Detectives were not simply trying to prove where Kohberger’s car or phone had been; they were digging through his social activity, cloud-based digital life and financial history to determine whether any part of that record could establish planning, contact, purchases, motive or behavior connected to the King Road murders.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2964bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-captain-of-security-operations-at-mcc-and-his-oig-deposition-part-11-12-9-6-26--74926532

The most serious value of the interview is in the irregularities it surfaces. The captain reportedly discussed inaccurate rosters or logs, acknowledged questions around skipped SHU rounds, addressed the fact that Epstein had previously been on suicide watch, and said he would not necessarily have known in real time if officers were failing to conduct required checks. Even more troubling, he expressed concern that certain documents may have been deliberately removed from files that should have been reviewed or audited, and investigators also raised an inmate-count issue involving an inmate named Reyes, whose release may not have been properly reflected in the institution’s count — something the captain treated as a protocol violation. Taken together, the transcript adds another layer to the larger Epstein death record: not a single clean explanation, but a bureaucratic mess of missing or questionable documentation, staffing failures, broken supervision, and institutional chaos at precisely the moment when the most high-profile federal inmate in America was supposed to be under careful control.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

EFTA00111830.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74926532Sun, 06 Sep 2026 08:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s death. The captain described the command...

The most serious value of the interview is in the irregularities it surfaces. The captain reportedly discussed inaccurate rosters or logs, acknowledged questions around skipped SHU rounds, addressed the fact that Epstein had previously been on suicide watch, and said he would not necessarily have known in real time if officers were failing to conduct required checks. Even more troubling, he expressed concern that certain documents may have been deliberately removed from files that should have been reviewed or audited, and investigators also raised an inmate-count issue involving an inmate named Reyes, whose release may not have been properly reflected in the institution’s count — something the captain treated as a protocol violation. Taken together, the transcript adds another layer to the larger Epstein death record: not a single clean explanation, but a bureaucratic mess of missing or questionable documentation, staffing failures, broken supervision, and institutional chaos at precisely the moment when the most high-profile federal inmate in America was supposed to be under careful control.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

EFTA00111830.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2616epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-captain-of-security-operations-at-mcc-and-his-oig-deposition-part-8-10-9-5-26--74926533

The most serious value of the interview is in the irregularities it surfaces. The captain reportedly discussed inaccurate rosters or logs, acknowledged questions around skipped SHU rounds, addressed the fact that Epstein had previously been on suicide watch, and said he would not necessarily have known in real time if officers were failing to conduct required checks. Even more troubling, he expressed concern that certain documents may have been deliberately removed from files that should have been reviewed or audited, and investigators also raised an inmate-count issue involving an inmate named Reyes, whose release may not have been properly reflected in the institution’s count — something the captain treated as a protocol violation. Taken together, the transcript adds another layer to the larger Epstein death record: not a single clean explanation, but a bureaucratic mess of missing or questionable documentation, staffing failures, broken supervision, and institutional chaos at precisely the moment when the most high-profile federal inmate in America was supposed to be under careful control.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

EFTA00111830.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74926533Sun, 06 Sep 2026 06:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s death. The captain described the command...

The most serious value of the interview is in the irregularities it surfaces. The captain reportedly discussed inaccurate rosters or logs, acknowledged questions around skipped SHU rounds, addressed the fact that Epstein had previously been on suicide watch, and said he would not necessarily have known in real time if officers were failing to conduct required checks. Even more troubling, he expressed concern that certain documents may have been deliberately removed from files that should have been reviewed or audited, and investigators also raised an inmate-count issue involving an inmate named Reyes, whose release may not have been properly reflected in the institution’s count — something the captain treated as a protocol violation. Taken together, the transcript adds another layer to the larger Epstein death record: not a single clean explanation, but a bureaucratic mess of missing or questionable documentation, staffing failures, broken supervision, and institutional chaos at precisely the moment when the most high-profile federal inmate in America was supposed to be under careful control.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

EFTA00111830.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2564epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-bryan-kohberger-and-the-subpoena-he-sent-to-bethany-funke--74926576
Funke fought the subpoena through her Nevada attorney, who argued that the defense had offered only conclusory statements about the supposed exculpatory information and had not shown why her testimony was necessary at a preliminary hearing. Her lawyer also argued that Nevada law required a hearing before an out-of-state resident could be compelled to testify elsewhere and questioned whether an Idaho criminal defendant had authority to summon a Nevada witness under those circumstances. The dispute ultimately eased when Funke agreed to sit for an interview with Kohberger’s attorneys in Reno instead of being forced to travel to Idaho for the preliminary hearing. That arrangement meant the defense could explore whatever information it believed Funke possessed without immediately compelling her courtroom testimony, and the subpoena fight effectively became another early indication that Kohberger’s attorneys believed one of the two surviving roommates might possess information useful to the defense.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74926576Sun, 06 Sep 2026 04:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBryan Kohberger’s defense team tried to compel surviving roommate Bethany Funke to testify at his preliminary hearing after a defense investigator claimed she possessed information that was both material to the charges and potentially exculpatory....
Funke fought the subpoena through her Nevada attorney, who argued that the defense had offered only conclusory statements about the supposed exculpatory information and had not shown why her testimony was necessary at a preliminary hearing. Her lawyer also argued that Nevada law required a hearing before an out-of-state resident could be compelled to testify elsewhere and questioned whether an Idaho criminal defendant had authority to summon a Nevada witness under those circumstances. The dispute ultimately eased when Funke agreed to sit for an interview with Kohberger’s attorneys in Reno instead of being forced to travel to Idaho for the preliminary hearing. That arrangement meant the defense could explore whatever information it believed Funke possessed without immediately compelling her courtroom testimony, and the subpoena fight effectively became another early indication that Kohberger’s attorneys believed one of the two surviving roommates might possess information useful to the defense.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>770epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-dylan-mortensen-s-step-mother-and-the-interview-with-the-ny-post--74926549

Munroe also said the online harassment became so severe that Mortensen eventually transferred to another university and tried to rebuild her life away from the constant attention surrounding the case. She defended Mortensen against the people attacking her for not immediately calling police, emphasizing that outsiders had no idea what it was like to experience that kind of terror and trauma firsthand. The interview painted a very different picture from the suspicion and cruelty circulating online: Mortensen was not someone casually moving on from what happened, but a young woman dealing with guilt, fear and the psychological aftermath of surviving a massacre that killed four of her closest friends. Her former stepmother’s comments were therefore less about explaining every unanswered question from that night and more about reminding the public that Mortensen was herself a surviving victim of the King Road murders, and that the internet’s treatment of her had compounded trauma she was already struggling to survive.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74926549Sun, 06 Sep 2026 02:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDylan Mortensen’s former stepmother, Patti Munroe, told the New York Post that Mortensen was struggling badly in the aftermath of the murders and was carrying intense survivor’s guilt over the deaths of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle...

Munroe also said the online harassment became so severe that Mortensen eventually transferred to another university and tried to rebuild her life away from the constant attention surrounding the case. She defended Mortensen against the people attacking her for not immediately calling police, emphasizing that outsiders had no idea what it was like to experience that kind of terror and trauma firsthand. The interview painted a very different picture from the suspicion and cruelty circulating online: Mortensen was not someone casually moving on from what happened, but a young woman dealing with guilt, fear and the psychological aftermath of surviving a massacre that killed four of her closest friends. Her former stepmother’s comments were therefore less about explaining every unanswered question from that night and more about reminding the public that Mortensen was herself a surviving victim of the King Road murders, and that the internet’s treatment of her had compounded trauma she was already struggling to survive.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>746bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/judge-graf-and-the-order-to-bind-tyler-robinson-over-for-trial-on-all-counts-charged-part-2-9-5-26--74926475
Graf also found sufficient evidence at the preliminary-hearing stage to infer that Robinson would have been aware of those people when he allegedly fired. The judge pointed to evidence that Robinson had been at the location beforehand, that there was a clear line of sight from the southwest roof area to Kirk’s canopy and that the rifle allegedly used contained an optic. Graf stopped short of making findings about exactly what Robinson could see through the scope or calculating the probability that a bullet could have ricocheted, overpenetrated or deviated from its intended path. Instead, he ruled that the totality of the evidence was enough to satisfy the relatively low probable-cause threshold and bind Robinson over for trial. Robinson has pleaded not guilty to all seven counts, and the aggravated-murder charge remains the count carrying potential capital punishment as the case now moves into its full pretrial phase.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:


Judge's order on accused Charlie Kirk assassin Tyler Robinson published by court | Fox News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74926475Sun, 06 Sep 2026 00:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJudge Tony Graf’s newly published written order explains why Tyler Robinson will stand trial on all seven charges in the killing of Charlie Kirk and why prosecutors can continue pursuing the death penalty. The key issue on the capital...
Graf also found sufficient evidence at the preliminary-hearing stage to infer that Robinson would have been aware of those people when he allegedly fired. The judge pointed to evidence that Robinson had been at the location beforehand, that there was a clear line of sight from the southwest roof area to Kirk’s canopy and that the rifle allegedly used contained an optic. Graf stopped short of making findings about exactly what Robinson could see through the scope or calculating the probability that a bullet could have ricocheted, overpenetrated or deviated from its intended path. Instead, he ruled that the totality of the evidence was enough to satisfy the relatively low probable-cause threshold and bind Robinson over for trial. Robinson has pleaded not guilty to all seven counts, and the aggravated-murder charge remains the count carrying potential capital punishment as the case now moves into its full pretrial phase.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:


Judge's order on accused Charlie Kirk assassin Tyler Robinson published by court | Fox News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>662breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/judge-graf-and-the-order-to-bind-tyler-robinson-over-for-trial-on-all-counts-charged-part-1-9-5-26--74926474
Graf also found sufficient evidence at the preliminary-hearing stage to infer that Robinson would have been aware of those people when he allegedly fired. The judge pointed to evidence that Robinson had been at the location beforehand, that there was a clear line of sight from the southwest roof area to Kirk’s canopy and that the rifle allegedly used contained an optic. Graf stopped short of making findings about exactly what Robinson could see through the scope or calculating the probability that a bullet could have ricocheted, overpenetrated or deviated from its intended path. Instead, he ruled that the totality of the evidence was enough to satisfy the relatively low probable-cause threshold and bind Robinson over for trial. Robinson has pleaded not guilty to all seven counts, and the aggravated-murder charge remains the count carrying potential capital punishment as the case now moves into its full pretrial phase.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:


Judge's order on accused Charlie Kirk assassin Tyler Robinson published by court | Fox News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74926474Sat, 05 Sep 2026 22:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJudge Tony Graf’s newly published written order explains why Tyler Robinson will stand trial on all seven charges in the killing of Charlie Kirk and why prosecutors can continue pursuing the death penalty. The key issue on the capital...
Graf also found sufficient evidence at the preliminary-hearing stage to infer that Robinson would have been aware of those people when he allegedly fired. The judge pointed to evidence that Robinson had been at the location beforehand, that there was a clear line of sight from the southwest roof area to Kirk’s canopy and that the rifle allegedly used contained an optic. Graf stopped short of making findings about exactly what Robinson could see through the scope or calculating the probability that a bullet could have ricocheted, overpenetrated or deviated from its intended path. Instead, he ruled that the totality of the evidence was enough to satisfy the relatively low probable-cause threshold and bind Robinson over for trial. Robinson has pleaded not guilty to all seven counts, and the aggravated-murder charge remains the count carrying potential capital punishment as the case now moves into its full pretrial phase.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:


Judge's order on accused Charlie Kirk assassin Tyler Robinson published by court | Fox News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>750breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/if-leon-black-can-drag-congress-into-court-imagine-what-epstein-survivors-were-up-against-part-2-9-5-26--74910893
That is also why the constant question about why more Epstein survivors did not come forward earlier is so dishonest. If Leon Black is willing and able to take on the United States Congress itself, imagine what an ordinary survivor might believe she is facing when deciding whether to confront someone with enormous wealth, elite legal representation, and the ability to litigate every inch of the process. Coming forward can mean years of depositions, attacks on credibility, legal expense, public scrutiny, and emotional devastation, while the person on the other side may have resources that are effectively limitless. None of that proves Black committed any Epstein-related crime, but it demonstrates exactly how intimidating the machinery surrounding powerful people can be. If Congress cannot quickly enforce its own demands against an Epstein associate with Black’s resources, then nobody should sneer at survivors for being reluctant to enter that same battlefield alone.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74910893Sat, 05 Sep 2026 20:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciLeon Black’s decision to refuse a sworn deposition and sue the House Oversight Committee over its Epstein investigation has become a brutal illustration of the power imbalance that has haunted the case from the beginning. Black has every right to...
That is also why the constant question about why more Epstein survivors did not come forward earlier is so dishonest. If Leon Black is willing and able to take on the United States Congress itself, imagine what an ordinary survivor might believe she is facing when deciding whether to confront someone with enormous wealth, elite legal representation, and the ability to litigate every inch of the process. Coming forward can mean years of depositions, attacks on credibility, legal expense, public scrutiny, and emotional devastation, while the person on the other side may have resources that are effectively limitless. None of that proves Black committed any Epstein-related crime, but it demonstrates exactly how intimidating the machinery surrounding powerful people can be. If Congress cannot quickly enforce its own demands against an Epstein associate with Black’s resources, then nobody should sneer at survivors for being reluctant to enter that same battlefield alone.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>661epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/if-leon-black-can-drag-congress-into-court-imagine-what-epstein-survivors-were-up-against-part-1-9-5-26--74910894
That is also why the constant question about why more Epstein survivors did not come forward earlier is so dishonest. If Leon Black is willing and able to take on the United States Congress itself, imagine what an ordinary survivor might believe she is facing when deciding whether to confront someone with enormous wealth, elite legal representation, and the ability to litigate every inch of the process. Coming forward can mean years of depositions, attacks on credibility, legal expense, public scrutiny, and emotional devastation, while the person on the other side may have resources that are effectively limitless. None of that proves Black committed any Epstein-related crime, but it demonstrates exactly how intimidating the machinery surrounding powerful people can be. If Congress cannot quickly enforce its own demands against an Epstein associate with Black’s resources, then nobody should sneer at survivors for being reluctant to enter that same battlefield alone.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74910894Sat, 05 Sep 2026 18:30:04 +0000Bobby CapucciLeon Black’s decision to refuse a sworn deposition and sue the House Oversight Committee over its Epstein investigation has become a brutal illustration of the power imbalance that has haunted the case from the beginning. Black has every right to...
That is also why the constant question about why more Epstein survivors did not come forward earlier is so dishonest. If Leon Black is willing and able to take on the United States Congress itself, imagine what an ordinary survivor might believe she is facing when deciding whether to confront someone with enormous wealth, elite legal representation, and the ability to litigate every inch of the process. Coming forward can mean years of depositions, attacks on credibility, legal expense, public scrutiny, and emotional devastation, while the person on the other side may have resources that are effectively limitless. None of that proves Black committed any Epstein-related crime, but it demonstrates exactly how intimidating the machinery surrounding powerful people can be. If Congress cannot quickly enforce its own demands against an Epstein associate with Black’s resources, then nobody should sneer at survivors for being reluctant to enter that same battlefield alone.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>771epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/katie-phang-presses-doj-over-epstein-records-and-fbi-interview-notes-9-5-26--74910895
The filing also sharply challenged DOJ’s claim that it had complied with the law’s requirement for a redaction log by publishing a six-page letter in the Federal Register. Phang’s attorneys argued that the letter merely satisfied a separate provision requiring a general summary of withheld material and did not meet the statute’s requirement that every individual redaction be accompanied by a written justification. They asked the court to order Blanche to publish a complete, legally compliant redaction log within ten days. The filing also rejected the government’s attempt to slow the proceedings while it pursued what it called a “protective” appeal, noting that DOJ had not actually filed a substantive motion demonstrating why a stay was warranted. Phang’s lawyers argued that administrative inconvenience or staffing burdens do not amount to irreparable harm and maintained that the government should not be permitted to use an appeal to postpone compliance with either the Epstein Files Transparency Act or Judge Sullivan’s existing injunction.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.291779.40.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74910895Sat, 05 Sep 2026 16:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn a September 2 filing, attorneys for Katie Phang accused Attorney General Todd Blanche of continuing to resist a federal court order requiring greater transparency in the government’s release of Jeffrey Epstein-related records. The dispute centers...
The filing also sharply challenged DOJ’s claim that it had complied with the law’s requirement for a redaction log by publishing a six-page letter in the Federal Register. Phang’s attorneys argued that the letter merely satisfied a separate provision requiring a general summary of withheld material and did not meet the statute’s requirement that every individual redaction be accompanied by a written justification. They asked the court to order Blanche to publish a complete, legally compliant redaction log within ten days. The filing also rejected the government’s attempt to slow the proceedings while it pursued what it called a “protective” appeal, noting that DOJ had not actually filed a substantive motion demonstrating why a stay was warranted. Phang’s lawyers argued that administrative inconvenience or staffing burdens do not amount to irreparable harm and maintained that the government should not be permitted to use an appeal to postpone compliance with either the Epstein Files Transparency Act or Judge Sullivan’s existing injunction.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.291779.40.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>751epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-warrant-for-instagram-twitter-and-ups-in-the-kohberger-case-9-5-26--74902210
The UPS warrant was different because it was aimed at physical movement rather than social-media activity. Investigators sought surveillance video from UPS delivery vehicles operating in the Moscow area, including footage covering the period surrounding the murders, as part of the massive effort to collect every available camera angle that might have captured vehicles or people moving near King Road. Delivery trucks can carry multiple exterior cameras and travel routes that residential security systems may not cover, making them potentially valuable sources of evidence in reconstructing a suspect vehicle’s movements. Taken together, the Twitter, Instagram and UPS warrants showed how widely investigators cast their net: they were simultaneously trying to reconstruct Kohberger’s online behavior, determine whether he had any digital connection to the victims and assemble surveillance footage from businesses, homes and even delivery vehicles to build a minute-by-minute picture of what happened before and after the murders.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74902210Sat, 05 Sep 2026 14:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciInvestigators in the Bryan Kohberger case used search warrants directed at Twitter and Instagram to reconstruct both his digital footprint and any possible online connection to Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. The...
The UPS warrant was different because it was aimed at physical movement rather than social-media activity. Investigators sought surveillance video from UPS delivery vehicles operating in the Moscow area, including footage covering the period surrounding the murders, as part of the massive effort to collect every available camera angle that might have captured vehicles or people moving near King Road. Delivery trucks can carry multiple exterior cameras and travel routes that residential security systems may not cover, making them potentially valuable sources of evidence in reconstructing a suspect vehicle’s movements. Taken together, the Twitter, Instagram and UPS warrants showed how widely investigators cast their net: they were simultaneously trying to reconstruct Kohberger’s online behavior, determine whether he had any digital connection to the victims and assemble surveillance footage from businesses, homes and even delivery vehicles to build a minute-by-minute picture of what happened before and after the murders.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2871bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-s-motion-to-suppress-the-arrest-warrant-and-denial-9-5-26--74902209
Prosecutors responded that the defense was improperly dissecting the affidavit piece by piece instead of considering the totality of the evidence presented to the issuing judge. The state argued that investigators had assembled multiple independent strands pointing toward Kohberger: a vehicle consistent with his Elantra appearing repeatedly near the crime scene, cellphone activity that prosecutors said tracked with the vehicle’s movements before and after the murders, his connection to nearby Washington State University, and DNA evidence linking him to the knife sheath recovered beside one of the victims. Prosecutors maintained that probable cause did not require proof beyond a reasonable doubt or an airtight explanation for every apparent inconsistency, only a fair probability that Kohberger had committed the crimes. They therefore argued that the arrest warrant was lawfully issued and that there was no basis to suppress the evidence gathered afterward.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci!@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74902209Sat, 05 Sep 2026 12:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBryan Kohberger’s defense moved to suppress the Pennsylvania arrest warrant and the evidence that flowed from it, arguing that the warrant affidavit did not establish probable cause and that investigators had relied on a collection of weak or...
Prosecutors responded that the defense was improperly dissecting the affidavit piece by piece instead of considering the totality of the evidence presented to the issuing judge. The state argued that investigators had assembled multiple independent strands pointing toward Kohberger: a vehicle consistent with his Elantra appearing repeatedly near the crime scene, cellphone activity that prosecutors said tracked with the vehicle’s movements before and after the murders, his connection to nearby Washington State University, and DNA evidence linking him to the knife sheath recovered beside one of the victims. Prosecutors maintained that probable cause did not require proof beyond a reasonable doubt or an airtight explanation for every apparent inconsistency, only a fair probability that Kohberger had committed the crimes. They therefore argued that the arrest warrant was lawfully issued and that there was no basis to suppress the evidence gathered afterward.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci!@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2747bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-judge-hippler-makes-a-ruling-on-the-att-warrant-and-the-hyundai-warrant-9-5-26--74902207Judge Steven Hippler rejected Bryan Kohberger’s effort to suppress evidence obtained through AT&T warrants that gave investigators access to cellphone records used to reconstruct his movements before and after the murders. Kohberger’s defense had attacked the warrants on constitutional and probable-cause grounds, arguing that the applications relied on flawed or incomplete assertions and that investigators should not have been permitted to obtain the breadth of historical location and subscriber data they sought. Hippler disagreed, finding that the warrants were supported by sufficient probable cause when the affidavits were read as a whole and that investigators had established an adequate factual connection between Kohberger, his phone and the homicide investigation. His February 19, 2025 order therefore allowed prosecutors to continue using the AT&T-derived evidence, preserving one of the major digital pillars of the state’s timeline against Kohberger.

Hippler also denied Kohberger’s challenge to the Pennsylvania search warrant for the white Hyundai Elantra seized at his parents’ home after his December 2022 arrest. The defense sought to suppress the evidence collected from the car, along with other Pennsylvania searches, but Hippler concluded that the warrants were lawfully supported and rejected the defense’s broader arguments for exclusion. That ruling meant investigators could retain evidence recovered from Kohberger’s Hyundai and prosecutors could continue tying the vehicle search to the larger case involving surveillance footage of a white sedan, cellphone evidence and Kohberger’s alleged movements. Taken together, Hippler’s rulings were a substantial loss for the defense because they left both the state’s digital-location evidence and the physical evidence obtained from Kohberger’s car intact rather than stripping two important investigative avenues out of the case before trial.


to ocntact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74902207Sat, 05 Sep 2026 10:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJudge Steven Hippler rejected Bryan Kohberger’s effort to suppress evidence obtained through AT&T warrants that gave investigators access to cellphone records used to reconstruct his movements before and after the murders. Kohberger’s defense had...Judge Steven Hippler rejected Bryan Kohberger’s effort to suppress evidence obtained through AT&T warrants that gave investigators access to cellphone records used to reconstruct his movements before and after the murders. Kohberger’s defense had attacked the warrants on constitutional and probable-cause grounds, arguing that the applications relied on flawed or incomplete assertions and that investigators should not have been permitted to obtain the breadth of historical location and subscriber data they sought. Hippler disagreed, finding that the warrants were supported by sufficient probable cause when the affidavits were read as a whole and that investigators had established an adequate factual connection between Kohberger, his phone and the homicide investigation. His February 19, 2025 order therefore allowed prosecutors to continue using the AT&T-derived evidence, preserving one of the major digital pillars of the state’s timeline against Kohberger.

Hippler also denied Kohberger’s challenge to the Pennsylvania search warrant for the white Hyundai Elantra seized at his parents’ home after his December 2022 arrest. The defense sought to suppress the evidence collected from the car, along with other Pennsylvania searches, but Hippler concluded that the warrants were lawfully supported and rejected the defense’s broader arguments for exclusion. That ruling meant investigators could retain evidence recovered from Kohberger’s Hyundai and prosecutors could continue tying the vehicle search to the larger case involving surveillance footage of a white sedan, cellphone evidence and Kohberger’s alleged movements. Taken together, Hippler’s rulings were a substantial loss for the defense because they left both the state’s digital-location evidence and the physical evidence obtained from Kohberger’s car intact rather than stripping two important investigative avenues out of the case before trial.


to ocntact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3009bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-captain-of-security-operations-at-mcc-and-his-oig-deposition-part-4-7-9-5-26--74902208

The most serious value of the interview is in the irregularities it surfaces. The captain reportedly discussed inaccurate rosters or logs, acknowledged questions around skipped SHU rounds, addressed the fact that Epstein had previously been on suicide watch, and said he would not necessarily have known in real time if officers were failing to conduct required checks. Even more troubling, he expressed concern that certain documents may have been deliberately removed from files that should have been reviewed or audited, and investigators also raised an inmate-count issue involving an inmate named Reyes, whose release may not have been properly reflected in the institution’s count — something the captain treated as a protocol violation. Taken together, the transcript adds another layer to the larger Epstein death record: not a single clean explanation, but a bureaucratic mess of missing or questionable documentation, staffing failures, broken supervision, and institutional chaos at precisely the moment when the most high-profile federal inmate in America was supposed to be under careful control.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

EFTA00111830.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74902208Sat, 05 Sep 2026 08:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s death. The captain described the command...

The most serious value of the interview is in the irregularities it surfaces. The captain reportedly discussed inaccurate rosters or logs, acknowledged questions around skipped SHU rounds, addressed the fact that Epstein had previously been on suicide watch, and said he would not necessarily have known in real time if officers were failing to conduct required checks. Even more troubling, he expressed concern that certain documents may have been deliberately removed from files that should have been reviewed or audited, and investigators also raised an inmate-count issue involving an inmate named Reyes, whose release may not have been properly reflected in the institution’s count — something the captain treated as a protocol violation. Taken together, the transcript adds another layer to the larger Epstein death record: not a single clean explanation, but a bureaucratic mess of missing or questionable documentation, staffing failures, broken supervision, and institutional chaos at precisely the moment when the most high-profile federal inmate in America was supposed to be under careful control.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

EFTA00111830.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3041epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-captain-of-security-operations-at-mcc-and-his-oig-deposition-part-1-3-9-4-26--74902206

The most serious value of the interview is in the irregularities it surfaces. The captain reportedly discussed inaccurate rosters or logs, acknowledged questions around skipped SHU rounds, addressed the fact that Epstein had previously been on suicide watch, and said he would not necessarily have known in real time if officers were failing to conduct required checks. Even more troubling, he expressed concern that certain documents may have been deliberately removed from files that should have been reviewed or audited, and investigators also raised an inmate-count issue involving an inmate named Reyes, whose release may not have been properly reflected in the institution’s count — something the captain treated as a protocol violation. Taken together, the transcript adds another layer to the larger Epstein death record: not a single clean explanation, but a bureaucratic mess of missing or questionable documentation, staffing failures, broken supervision, and institutional chaos at precisely the moment when the most high-profile federal inmate in America was supposed to be under careful control.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

EFTA00111830.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74902206Sat, 05 Sep 2026 06:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe document is a sworn OIG interview transcript from June 15, 2021, involving the Bureau of Prisons captain who oversaw security operations at MCC New York during the period surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s death. The captain described the command...

The most serious value of the interview is in the irregularities it surfaces. The captain reportedly discussed inaccurate rosters or logs, acknowledged questions around skipped SHU rounds, addressed the fact that Epstein had previously been on suicide watch, and said he would not necessarily have known in real time if officers were failing to conduct required checks. Even more troubling, he expressed concern that certain documents may have been deliberately removed from files that should have been reviewed or audited, and investigators also raised an inmate-count issue involving an inmate named Reyes, whose release may not have been properly reflected in the institution’s count — something the captain treated as a protocol violation. Taken together, the transcript adds another layer to the larger Epstein death record: not a single clean explanation, but a bureaucratic mess of missing or questionable documentation, staffing failures, broken supervision, and institutional chaos at precisely the moment when the most high-profile federal inmate in America was supposed to be under careful control.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

EFTA00111830.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2684epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-bryan-kohberger-and-his-plan-to-deal-with-eye-witness-testimony--74902348Court observers expected surviving roommate Dylan Mortensen to become one of the most important witnesses in Bryan Kohberger’s eventual trial because she was the only known eyewitness who said she saw the masked intruder inside the King Road house on the night Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin were murdered. Mortensen told investigators she had opened her bedroom door after hearing noises, saw a man dressed in black with a mask covering part of his face and noticed what she described as “bushy eyebrows” before he walked toward the sliding glass door. Court TV executive producer Ted Rowlands said the defense would likely “jump on” Mortensen when she testified because her account gave prosecutors valuable eyewitness evidence but also exposed areas ripe for cross-examination. Chief among them was the long delay before anyone called 911, despite Mortensen saying she had been frightened enough by what she saw to lock herself inside her room.

The defense was therefore expected to scrutinize Mortensen’s memory, perception and actions during and after the killings, particularly the apparent disconnect between describing herself as being in a “frozen shock phase” and the fact that police were not summoned until nearly noon. Rowlands believed that issue could become pivotal because jurors would likely want to understand what Mortensen heard, what she believed was happening and why no emergency call was made for hours. Her testimony also carried enormous emotional and evidentiary weight because prosecutors could use her description of the intruder to reinforce other evidence against Kohberger, while the defense could try to create reasonable doubt by challenging the reliability of what she remembered under traumatic circumstances. The article ultimately framed Mortensen as a witness both sides would have needed badly: prosecutors because she put a masked man inside the house, and the defense because the unanswered questions surrounding that night gave them one of their clearest opportunities to attack the state’s narrative.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74902348Sat, 05 Sep 2026 04:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciCourt observers expected surviving roommate Dylan Mortensen to become one of the most important witnesses in Bryan Kohberger’s eventual trial because she was the only known eyewitness who said she saw the masked intruder inside the King Road house on...Court observers expected surviving roommate Dylan Mortensen to become one of the most important witnesses in Bryan Kohberger’s eventual trial because she was the only known eyewitness who said she saw the masked intruder inside the King Road house on the night Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin were murdered. Mortensen told investigators she had opened her bedroom door after hearing noises, saw a man dressed in black with a mask covering part of his face and noticed what she described as “bushy eyebrows” before he walked toward the sliding glass door. Court TV executive producer Ted Rowlands said the defense would likely “jump on” Mortensen when she testified because her account gave prosecutors valuable eyewitness evidence but also exposed areas ripe for cross-examination. Chief among them was the long delay before anyone called 911, despite Mortensen saying she had been frightened enough by what she saw to lock herself inside her room.

The defense was therefore expected to scrutinize Mortensen’s memory, perception and actions during and after the killings, particularly the apparent disconnect between describing herself as being in a “frozen shock phase” and the fact that police were not summoned until nearly noon. Rowlands believed that issue could become pivotal because jurors would likely want to understand what Mortensen heard, what she believed was happening and why no emergency call was made for hours. Her testimony also carried enormous emotional and evidentiary weight because prosecutors could use her description of the intruder to reinforce other evidence against Kohberger, while the defense could try to create reasonable doubt by challenging the reliability of what she remembered under traumatic circumstances. The article ultimately framed Mortensen as a witness both sides would have needed badly: prosecutors because she put a masked man inside the house, and the defense because the unanswered questions surrounding that night gave them one of their clearest opportunities to attack the state’s narrative.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>786bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-what-we-knew-about-the-surviving-roommates-in-the-early-stages--74902346
The reporting also underscored how incomplete the public understanding of the case was during those first days. There was no publicly identified suspect, no known motive and no explanation for why Mortensen and Funke had survived while the other four were killed. Police said they had spoken with the surviving roommates and were working to reconstruct the timeline, but they released very little about what the women may have heard or seen. Much of that early narrative would later change dramatically after Bryan Kohberger’s arrest, when court records revealed that Mortensen had actually been awake, had heard activity inside the house and had seen a masked man dressed in black walking past her bedroom. Looking back, the early reporting on Mortensen and Funke captured just how little investigators were willing to disclose at the beginning and how substantially the known story of the surviving roommates would evolve as the case developed.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74902346Sat, 05 Sep 2026 02:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn the immediate aftermath of the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, attention quickly turned to the two roommates who had survived the attack: Dylan Mortensen and Bethany Funke. Both women had been inside the...
The reporting also underscored how incomplete the public understanding of the case was during those first days. There was no publicly identified suspect, no known motive and no explanation for why Mortensen and Funke had survived while the other four were killed. Police said they had spoken with the surviving roommates and were working to reconstruct the timeline, but they released very little about what the women may have heard or seen. Much of that early narrative would later change dramatically after Bryan Kohberger’s arrest, when court records revealed that Mortensen had actually been awake, had heard activity inside the house and had seen a masked man dressed in black walking past her bedroom. Looking back, the early reporting on Mortensen and Funke captured just how little investigators were willing to disclose at the beginning and how substantially the known story of the surviving roommates would evolve as the case developed.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>794bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-the-surviving-roommates-were-texting-during-the-attacks-per-sources--74902347
The report also said Goncalves tried to learn more about what the surviving roommates had experienced but was warned by the FBI not to contact a potential witness whose identity had been protected after the person came forward through a confidential tip line. Inside Edition emphasized that it could not independently confirm the claims about the roommates texting or hearing the entire attack because the gag order prevented police and prosecutors from commenting. Even so, the story highlighted a significant discrepancy in the early public narrative: authorities initially portrayed both surviving roommates as sleeping through the murders, while later court records established that at least D.M. had been awake and had witnessed a man leaving the house. The allegations about texting therefore became another unresolved piece of the case, raising questions about exactly what the surviving roommates knew in real time, what they communicated to each other and why the public account of their actions changed so dramatically after Kohberger’s arrest.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74902347Sat, 05 Sep 2026 00:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciA 2023 report raised new questions about what the two surviving roommates may have heard and done while Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin were being killed. According to Air Mail, Steve Goncalves had been told by someone...
The report also said Goncalves tried to learn more about what the surviving roommates had experienced but was warned by the FBI not to contact a potential witness whose identity had been protected after the person came forward through a confidential tip line. Inside Edition emphasized that it could not independently confirm the claims about the roommates texting or hearing the entire attack because the gag order prevented police and prosecutors from commenting. Even so, the story highlighted a significant discrepancy in the early public narrative: authorities initially portrayed both surviving roommates as sleeping through the murders, while later court records established that at least D.M. had been awake and had witnessed a man leaving the house. The allegations about texting therefore became another unresolved piece of the case, raising questions about exactly what the surviving roommates knew in real time, what they communicated to each other and why the public account of their actions changed so dramatically after Kohberger’s arrest.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>679bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/jes-staley-and-the-transcripts-from-his-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-9-9-4-26--74878609
The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein’s cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley’s professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.


to contact me:


bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74878609Fri, 04 Sep 2026 22:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe transcripts from Jes Staley’s July 24, 2026 interview with the House Oversight Committee revealed just how deep and personal his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein became, while also exposing contradictions in the way Staley had described that...
The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein’s cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley’s professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.


to contact me:


bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>855epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/jes-staley-and-the-transcripts-from-his-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-8-9-4-26--74878611
The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein’s cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley’s professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.


to contact me:


bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74878611Fri, 04 Sep 2026 20:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe transcripts from Jes Staley’s July 24, 2026 interview with the House Oversight Committee revealed just how deep and personal his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein became, while also exposing contradictions in the way Staley had described that...
The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein’s cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley’s professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.


to contact me:


bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>801epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/leon-black-sues-house-oversight-committee-in-escalating-epstein-probe-9-4-26--74902545
House Oversight Chairman James Comer has responded by accusing Black of hiding behind litigation to avoid answering questions, while ranking Democrat Robert Garcia has called for contempt proceedings over what he described as Black’s defiance of two congressional subpoenas. Comer says Black’s testimony is especially important because he was one of Epstein’s paying clients and possesses multiple NDAs that investigators want to examine. The timing of the lawsuit has added another layer to the fight because the current Congress ends on January 3, 2027, meaning a prolonged court battle could potentially force the committee to reissue subpoenas in the next session. The confrontation has therefore moved beyond a simple request for testimony and into a direct constitutional and procedural clash over Congress’s power to investigate Epstein’s associates. Black is trying to keep the committee from compelling him to testify or surrender certain records, while lawmakers are signaling that they may use contempt powers to force the issue.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Billionaire Leon Black sues House Oversight Committee amid NDA fight in Jeffrey Epstein probe

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74902545Fri, 04 Sep 2026 18:30:03 +0000Bobby CapucciLeon Black has sued the House Oversight Committee in an effort to block or invalidate subpoenas seeking his testimony and records about his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Black argues that the committee has exceeded its constitutional authority...
House Oversight Chairman James Comer has responded by accusing Black of hiding behind litigation to avoid answering questions, while ranking Democrat Robert Garcia has called for contempt proceedings over what he described as Black’s defiance of two congressional subpoenas. Comer says Black’s testimony is especially important because he was one of Epstein’s paying clients and possesses multiple NDAs that investigators want to examine. The timing of the lawsuit has added another layer to the fight because the current Congress ends on January 3, 2027, meaning a prolonged court battle could potentially force the committee to reissue subpoenas in the next session. The confrontation has therefore moved beyond a simple request for testimony and into a direct constitutional and procedural clash over Congress’s power to investigate Epstein’s associates. Black is trying to keep the committee from compelling him to testify or surrender certain records, while lawmakers are signaling that they may use contempt powers to force the issue.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Billionaire Leon Black sues House Oversight Committee amid NDA fight in Jeffrey Epstein probe

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>866epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/epstein-survivors-urge-leon-black-to-fully-cooperate-with-congress-9-4-26--74878610More than a dozen survivors of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell publicly urged billionaire Leon Black to fully cooperate with the House Oversight Committee as lawmakers prepared to question him about his relationship with Epstein. In a letter released ahead of Black’s scheduled deposition, the survivors called on him not only to appear, but also to comply with congressional subpoenas demanding records, including nondisclosure agreements in his possession. Black paid Epstein tens of millions of dollars for what he has described as tax and estate-planning services, and that enormous financial relationship has made him one of the most important figures in Congress’s renewed investigation. The survivors argued that Black’s use of NDAs deserved particular scrutiny because those agreements could help clarify the nature of his dealings with Epstein and others in Epstein’s orbit.


The pressure on Black was already escalating on Capitol Hill. House Oversight Chairman James Comer had threatened to hold him in contempt if he failed to cooperate, while Black had previously denied knowing about Epstein’s broader criminal conduct until the 2019 sex-trafficking charges, despite acknowledging that he knew Epstein had pleaded guilty in 2008 to charges involving a minor. Rep. Thomas Massie also named Black from the House floor while calling for the Justice Department to investigate Epstein associates more aggressively. The survivors’ message was therefore straightforward: Black’s immense financial dealings with Epstein, his possession of potentially relevant agreements and his acknowledged knowledge of Epstein’s 2008 conviction make full transparency necessary. They warned that if Black continued withholding records or resisted the committee’s demands, Congress should use every enforcement tool available to compel his cooperation.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Epstein survivors urge billionaire Leon Black to cooperate with House panel | Jeffrey Epstein | The Guardian

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74878610Fri, 04 Sep 2026 16:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciMore than a dozen survivors of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell publicly urged billionaire Leon Black to fully cooperate with the House Oversight Committee as lawmakers prepared to question him about his relationship with Epstein. In a letter...More than a dozen survivors of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell publicly urged billionaire Leon Black to fully cooperate with the House Oversight Committee as lawmakers prepared to question him about his relationship with Epstein. In a letter released ahead of Black’s scheduled deposition, the survivors called on him not only to appear, but also to comply with congressional subpoenas demanding records, including nondisclosure agreements in his possession. Black paid Epstein tens of millions of dollars for what he has described as tax and estate-planning services, and that enormous financial relationship has made him one of the most important figures in Congress’s renewed investigation. The survivors argued that Black’s use of NDAs deserved particular scrutiny because those agreements could help clarify the nature of his dealings with Epstein and others in Epstein’s orbit.


The pressure on Black was already escalating on Capitol Hill. House Oversight Chairman James Comer had threatened to hold him in contempt if he failed to cooperate, while Black had previously denied knowing about Epstein’s broader criminal conduct until the 2019 sex-trafficking charges, despite acknowledging that he knew Epstein had pleaded guilty in 2008 to charges involving a minor. Rep. Thomas Massie also named Black from the House floor while calling for the Justice Department to investigate Epstein associates more aggressively. The survivors’ message was therefore straightforward: Black’s immense financial dealings with Epstein, his possession of potentially relevant agreements and his acknowledged knowledge of Epstein’s 2008 conviction make full transparency necessary. They warned that if Black continued withholding records or resisted the committee’s demands, Congress should use every enforcement tool available to compel his cooperation.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Epstein survivors urge billionaire Leon Black to cooperate with House panel | Jeffrey Epstein | The Guardian

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>693epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/frederic-fekkai-accused-in-new-lawsuit-of-grooming-women-for-jeffrey-epstein-9-4-26--74878612
The lawsuit also places Fekkai’s business relationship with Epstein under scrutiny, alleging that Epstein helped boost Fekkai’s commercial success while Fekkai, in turn, provided services that benefited Epstein’s operation. The plaintiffs claim Epstein’s connections helped Fekkai’s products gain access to major retailers, including Victoria’s Secret, which was then controlled by Leslie Wexner, and they argue that Fekkai’s salon became intertwined with Epstein’s broader social and trafficking network. The case comes amid renewed congressional attention to Fekkai after Sarah Kellen reportedly accused him during a closed-door House interview of sexually assaulting her years earlier, an allegation Fekkai has denied. Rep. Thomas Massie has also publicly named Fekkai among people he believes should face further investigation. The new lawsuit therefore pushes Fekkai from being merely another name associated with Epstein into a direct civil defendant accused of helping shape and groom women for Epstein’s benefit.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Jeffrey Epstein's Celebrity Hairstylist Frédéric Fekkai Accused of Bleaching Girls Blond and Grooming Them 'Like Dolls' | IBTimes UK

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74878612Fri, 04 Sep 2026 14:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciSeven women have filed a civil lawsuit in New York accusing celebrity hairstylist Frédéric Fekkai and employee Patrick Coombs of helping groom them for Jeffrey Epstein, including by altering their appearance to suit Epstein’s preferences. According to...
The lawsuit also places Fekkai’s business relationship with Epstein under scrutiny, alleging that Epstein helped boost Fekkai’s commercial success while Fekkai, in turn, provided services that benefited Epstein’s operation. The plaintiffs claim Epstein’s connections helped Fekkai’s products gain access to major retailers, including Victoria’s Secret, which was then controlled by Leslie Wexner, and they argue that Fekkai’s salon became intertwined with Epstein’s broader social and trafficking network. The case comes amid renewed congressional attention to Fekkai after Sarah Kellen reportedly accused him during a closed-door House interview of sexually assaulting her years earlier, an allegation Fekkai has denied. Rep. Thomas Massie has also publicly named Fekkai among people he believes should face further investigation. The new lawsuit therefore pushes Fekkai from being merely another name associated with Epstein into a direct civil defendant accused of helping shape and groom women for Epstein’s benefit.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Jeffrey Epstein's Celebrity Hairstylist Frédéric Fekkai Accused of Bleaching Girls Blond and Grooming Them 'Like Dolls' | IBTimes UK

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>799epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/epstein-survivors-withdraw-wexner-lawsuit-without-prejudice-9-4-26--74878608

The dismissal was without prejudice, which means the survivors did not lose on the merits and are not necessarily barred from bringing the claims again. That distinction is important because the allegations against Wexner were never adjudicated; the case ended, for now, because of the jurisdictional battle rather than because a judge found the claims insufficient after a full merits review. Wexner has denied knowing about Epstein’s abuse, has not been criminally charged, and his representatives have argued that the complaint failed to provide a factual basis for holding him responsible. But the filing window created by New York City law remains open into 2027, leaving the possibility that the survivors could refile under a different procedural posture. So the immediate result is not an exoneration of Wexner or a defeat of the underlying allegations, but a tactical withdrawal after the case became bogged down in a fight over where it should be heard.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Epstein Abuse Claimants Withdraw Wexner Foundation Suit Without Prejudice After Federal Venue Fight | IBTimes UK

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74878608Fri, 04 Sep 2026 12:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciEleven Jeffrey Epstein survivors voluntarily dismissed their lawsuit against Leslie Wexner, the Wexner Foundation and Nine East 71st Street Corporation after a prolonged fight over whether the case belonged in state or federal court. The lawsuit was...

The dismissal was without prejudice, which means the survivors did not lose on the merits and are not necessarily barred from bringing the claims again. That distinction is important because the allegations against Wexner were never adjudicated; the case ended, for now, because of the jurisdictional battle rather than because a judge found the claims insufficient after a full merits review. Wexner has denied knowing about Epstein’s abuse, has not been criminally charged, and his representatives have argued that the complaint failed to provide a factual basis for holding him responsible. But the filing window created by New York City law remains open into 2027, leaving the possibility that the survivors could refile under a different procedural posture. So the immediate result is not an exoneration of Wexner or a defeat of the underlying allegations, but a tactical withdrawal after the case became bogged down in a fight over where it should be heard.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Epstein Abuse Claimants Withdraw Wexner Foundation Suit Without Prejudice After Federal Venue Fight | IBTimes UK

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>628epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-goncalves-family-and-the-reward-offered-in-the-wake-of-the-murders-9-4-26--74870201In the weeks after the murders, the Goncalves family said they wanted to raise money for a reward in hopes that a financial incentive might persuade someone with useful information to come forward. Kristi Goncalves said the family planned to use crowdfunding campaigns, including GoFundMe and GiveSendGo, to build a reward fund and, if necessary, hire a private investigator. At that point, the case was entering its fifth week with no publicly identified suspect, and the family was becoming increasingly frustrated with the pace of the investigation and the limited information being released by authorities. Nearly $15,000 had already been raised through the two campaigns, with the family saying the money would go toward getting answers as well as Kaylee’s final arrangements and celebration of life.

The proposed reward also highlighted the growing divide between the Goncalves family and law enforcement over how aggressively the public should be enlisted in the search for the killer. Moscow police said investigators were already receiving strong tips and leads and had not yet decided that an official reward was necessary, while the Goncalves family clearly believed every available tool should be used to generate information. Their willingness to independently raise money showed just how desperate they had become for movement in the case and how unwilling they were to simply wait for investigators to dictate the pace. Before Bryan Kohberger’s arrest later that month, the reward effort was another example of the family using public attention and media exposure to keep pressure on the investigation and search for anything that might break the case open.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com











Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74870201Fri, 04 Sep 2026 10:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn the weeks after the murders, the Goncalves family said they wanted to raise money for a reward in hopes that a financial incentive might persuade someone with useful information to come forward. Kristi Goncalves said the family planned to use...In the weeks after the murders, the Goncalves family said they wanted to raise money for a reward in hopes that a financial incentive might persuade someone with useful information to come forward. Kristi Goncalves said the family planned to use crowdfunding campaigns, including GoFundMe and GiveSendGo, to build a reward fund and, if necessary, hire a private investigator. At that point, the case was entering its fifth week with no publicly identified suspect, and the family was becoming increasingly frustrated with the pace of the investigation and the limited information being released by authorities. Nearly $15,000 had already been raised through the two campaigns, with the family saying the money would go toward getting answers as well as Kaylee’s final arrangements and celebration of life.

The proposed reward also highlighted the growing divide between the Goncalves family and law enforcement over how aggressively the public should be enlisted in the search for the killer. Moscow police said investigators were already receiving strong tips and leads and had not yet decided that an official reward was necessary, while the Goncalves family clearly believed every available tool should be used to generate information. Their willingness to independently raise money showed just how desperate they had become for movement in the case and how unwilling they were to simply wait for investigators to dictate the pace. Before Bryan Kohberger’s arrest later that month, the reward effort was another example of the family using public attention and media exposure to keep pressure on the investigation and search for anything that might break the case open.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com











Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2613bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-the-incel-theory-9-4-26--74870200

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74870200Fri, 04 Sep 2026 08:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciAfter Bryan Kohberger’s arrest, one of the more prominent theories floated by commentators and online sleuths was that the University of Idaho murders might have been connected to incel ideology or a broader resentment toward women. That theory drew...

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3076bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-jeffrey-epstein-ghislaine-maxwell-and-the-unexplained-french-angle-9-3-26--74871023

That unresolved history is now getting another look. In February 2026, Paris prosecutors opened fresh investigations into possible human trafficking and financial crimes after millions of newly released Epstein records produced new leads, and they also began a complete reanalysis of the earlier Brunel investigation. Prosecutors have acknowledged that the material could point to sexual offenses, trafficking, money laundering, tax fraud and other misconduct committed on French soil or involving French nationals, while urging additional survivors to come forward. The French dimension matters because Epstein’s activities there appear to have intersected with fashion agencies, wealthy social circles, politicians, diplomats and international travel in ways that have never been fully mapped publicly. So while France has investigated parts of the Epstein network, the larger question remains open: how extensive was the operation there, who facilitated it, how many victims were involved, and whether crimes tied to Epstein and Maxwell extended far beyond the handful of French allegations that have already reached investigators.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74871023Fri, 04 Sep 2026 06:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell had extensive ties to France, yet the full scope of what happened there remains far less explored than their activities in New York, Florida or the U.S. Virgin Islands. Epstein owned a lavish apartment on Avenue...

That unresolved history is now getting another look. In February 2026, Paris prosecutors opened fresh investigations into possible human trafficking and financial crimes after millions of newly released Epstein records produced new leads, and they also began a complete reanalysis of the earlier Brunel investigation. Prosecutors have acknowledged that the material could point to sexual offenses, trafficking, money laundering, tax fraud and other misconduct committed on French soil or involving French nationals, while urging additional survivors to come forward. The French dimension matters because Epstein’s activities there appear to have intersected with fashion agencies, wealthy social circles, politicians, diplomats and international travel in ways that have never been fully mapped publicly. So while France has investigated parts of the Epstein network, the larger question remains open: how extensive was the operation there, who facilitated it, how many victims were involved, and whether crimes tied to Epstein and Maxwell extended far beyond the handful of French allegations that have already reached investigators.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3249epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-did-bryan-kohberger-have-pictures-of-any-of-the-victims-stored-on-his-phone--74872493Reports in early 2023 claimed investigators had found multiple photographs of one of the female University of Idaho murder victims on a phone seized from Bryan Kohberger, though the identity of the woman and the origin of the images were not publicly disclosed. It was unclear whether Kohberger had taken the pictures himself, saved them from social media or obtained them some other way, but former FBI officials said the allegation, if accurate, could have been extremely significant because it might have helped prosecutors establish prior interest, fixation or a connection to one of the victims. Former FBI agent Jennifer Coffindaffer said such material could become part of a broader behavioral pattern, especially when considered alongside other evidence investigators were gathering about Kohberger’s movements, digital history and possible familiarity with the victims. At that stage, however, the claim came from unnamed sources and had not been confirmed in court filings.

The potential importance of the photos was that they could have helped answer one of the biggest unanswered questions in the case: whether Kohberger knew of or had focused on any of the victims before the murders. If the images predated November 13, 2022, prosecutors could have argued that they supported a theory of surveillance, fascination or targeting, depending on what the surrounding digital evidence showed. But the mere presence of a photograph would not, by itself, establish stalking, contact or motive, and investigators would have needed to determine when the images were obtained, how they reached the phone and what Kohberger did with them. Later examinations of Kohberger’s phone complicated the early reporting, with investigators publicly describing large numbers of selfies and cached images of women but not establishing the dramatic victim-photo claim in the way early reports had suggested.


to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74872493Fri, 04 Sep 2026 04:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciReports in early 2023 claimed investigators had found multiple photographs of one of the female University of Idaho murder victims on a phone seized from Bryan Kohberger, though the identity of the woman and the origin of the images were not publicly...Reports in early 2023 claimed investigators had found multiple photographs of one of the female University of Idaho murder victims on a phone seized from Bryan Kohberger, though the identity of the woman and the origin of the images were not publicly disclosed. It was unclear whether Kohberger had taken the pictures himself, saved them from social media or obtained them some other way, but former FBI officials said the allegation, if accurate, could have been extremely significant because it might have helped prosecutors establish prior interest, fixation or a connection to one of the victims. Former FBI agent Jennifer Coffindaffer said such material could become part of a broader behavioral pattern, especially when considered alongside other evidence investigators were gathering about Kohberger’s movements, digital history and possible familiarity with the victims. At that stage, however, the claim came from unnamed sources and had not been confirmed in court filings.

The potential importance of the photos was that they could have helped answer one of the biggest unanswered questions in the case: whether Kohberger knew of or had focused on any of the victims before the murders. If the images predated November 13, 2022, prosecutors could have argued that they supported a theory of surveillance, fascination or targeting, depending on what the surrounding digital evidence showed. But the mere presence of a photograph would not, by itself, establish stalking, contact or motive, and investigators would have needed to determine when the images were obtained, how they reached the phone and what Kohberger did with them. Later examinations of Kohberger’s phone complicated the early reporting, with investigators publicly describing large numbers of selfies and cached images of women but not establishing the dramatic victim-photo claim in the way early reports had suggested.


to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>635bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-the-moscow-murders-and-the-48-hour-rule--74786059In the early weeks after the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, attention turned to the familiar idea that the first 48 hours of a homicide investigation are the most important. The theory is rooted in the practical reality that witnesses’ memories are fresher, surveillance video is less likely to have been erased, physical evidence has had less time to degrade, and suspects have had less opportunity to destroy evidence, coordinate stories or disappear. But experts cautioned that the “48-hour rule” was not some hard deadline after which a murder suddenly became unsolvable. In Moscow, that distinction mattered because the case had already moved well beyond the first two days without an arrest, feeding public concern that investigators had missed their best opportunity. The reality was more complicated: police were still collecting forensic evidence, interviewing witnesses, obtaining digital records and reviewing enormous amounts of surveillance footage and tips.

The larger point was that time absolutely mattered, but modern homicide investigations could continue developing long after the first 48 hours because DNA testing, cellphone records, financial data, vehicle records and surveillance systems could generate leads weeks or even months later. In the Idaho case, investigators were dealing with an unusually complicated scene involving four victims, multiple surviving roommates, an off-campus house frequently visited by other students and a huge volume of physical and digital evidence. So while the lack of an immediate arrest created understandable anxiety, it did not mean the investigation was failing or that the case was destined to go cold. The first 48 hours were best understood as the most valuable opening window in an investigation, not an expiration date on the possibility of solving the murders.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74786059Fri, 04 Sep 2026 02:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn the early weeks after the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, attention turned to the familiar idea that the first 48 hours of a homicide investigation are the most important. The theory is rooted in the...In the early weeks after the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, attention turned to the familiar idea that the first 48 hours of a homicide investigation are the most important. The theory is rooted in the practical reality that witnesses’ memories are fresher, surveillance video is less likely to have been erased, physical evidence has had less time to degrade, and suspects have had less opportunity to destroy evidence, coordinate stories or disappear. But experts cautioned that the “48-hour rule” was not some hard deadline after which a murder suddenly became unsolvable. In Moscow, that distinction mattered because the case had already moved well beyond the first two days without an arrest, feeding public concern that investigators had missed their best opportunity. The reality was more complicated: police were still collecting forensic evidence, interviewing witnesses, obtaining digital records and reviewing enormous amounts of surveillance footage and tips.

The larger point was that time absolutely mattered, but modern homicide investigations could continue developing long after the first 48 hours because DNA testing, cellphone records, financial data, vehicle records and surveillance systems could generate leads weeks or even months later. In the Idaho case, investigators were dealing with an unusually complicated scene involving four victims, multiple surviving roommates, an off-campus house frequently visited by other students and a huge volume of physical and digital evidence. So while the lack of an immediate arrest created understandable anxiety, it did not mean the investigation was failing or that the case was destined to go cold. The first 48 hours were best understood as the most valuable opening window in an investigation, not an expiration date on the possibility of solving the murders.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>791bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/how-the-karen-read-effect-is-shaping-the-lindsay-clancy-trial-part-2-9-3-26--74868557

Years of covering Jeffrey Epstein have only made that behavior more intolerable because Epstein’s history provides legitimate reasons to distrust powerful institutions without requiring anyone to invent facts. Prosecutors can fail, police can make mistakes, governments can lie, and wealthy people can receive extraordinary treatment, but none of that means every rumor becomes true or every preferred theory deserves to be treated as established fact. Serious scrutiny demands the same skepticism toward your own conclusions that you apply to prosecutors, investigators, and institutions, and that standard disappears once criminal cases become fandom. Victims become props, defendants become mascots, witnesses become targets, and tragedy becomes content for people whose audiences reward outrage over accuracy. The Karen Read circus did not teach people to question authority; it demonstrated how easily public certainty can be manufactured before factual certainty has been earned. If that blueprint continues spreading, the justice system risks becoming another spectator sport driven by algorithms, personalities, money, and whichever crowd can scream the loudest.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74868557Fri, 04 Sep 2026 00:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe Karen Read case helped create a toxic blueprint for modern true-crime culture, where serious criminal proceedings are treated like team sports and public opinion is manipulated through repetition, outrage, harassment, and absolute certainty...

Years of covering Jeffrey Epstein have only made that behavior more intolerable because Epstein’s history provides legitimate reasons to distrust powerful institutions without requiring anyone to invent facts. Prosecutors can fail, police can make mistakes, governments can lie, and wealthy people can receive extraordinary treatment, but none of that means every rumor becomes true or every preferred theory deserves to be treated as established fact. Serious scrutiny demands the same skepticism toward your own conclusions that you apply to prosecutors, investigators, and institutions, and that standard disappears once criminal cases become fandom. Victims become props, defendants become mascots, witnesses become targets, and tragedy becomes content for people whose audiences reward outrage over accuracy. The Karen Read circus did not teach people to question authority; it demonstrated how easily public certainty can be manufactured before factual certainty has been earned. If that blueprint continues spreading, the justice system risks becoming another spectator sport driven by algorithms, personalities, money, and whichever crowd can scream the loudest.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>804clancytrial,courtroomnews,criminalresponsibility,duxburymurders,duxburytragedy,insanitydefense,lindsayclancy,lindsayclancycase,lindsayclancynews,lindsayclancytrial,lindsayclancyupdates,maternalmentalhealth,murdertrial,postpartummentalhealth,postpartumpsychosis,trialupdates,truecrime,truecrimecommunity,truecrimenews,truecrimepodcasttruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/how-the-karen-read-effect-is-shaping-the-lindsay-clancy-trial-part-1-9-3-26--74868558

Years of covering Jeffrey Epstein have only made that behavior more intolerable because Epstein’s history provides legitimate reasons to distrust powerful institutions without requiring anyone to invent facts. Prosecutors can fail, police can make mistakes, governments can lie, and wealthy people can receive extraordinary treatment, but none of that means every rumor becomes true or every preferred theory deserves to be treated as established fact. Serious scrutiny demands the same skepticism toward your own conclusions that you apply to prosecutors, investigators, and institutions, and that standard disappears once criminal cases become fandom. Victims become props, defendants become mascots, witnesses become targets, and tragedy becomes content for people whose audiences reward outrage over accuracy. The Karen Read circus did not teach people to question authority; it demonstrated how easily public certainty can be manufactured before factual certainty has been earned. If that blueprint continues spreading, the justice system risks becoming another spectator sport driven by algorithms, personalities, money, and whichever crowd can scream the loudest.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74868558Thu, 03 Sep 2026 22:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe Karen Read case helped create a toxic blueprint for modern true-crime culture, where serious criminal proceedings are treated like team sports and public opinion is manipulated through repetition, outrage, harassment, and absolute certainty...

Years of covering Jeffrey Epstein have only made that behavior more intolerable because Epstein’s history provides legitimate reasons to distrust powerful institutions without requiring anyone to invent facts. Prosecutors can fail, police can make mistakes, governments can lie, and wealthy people can receive extraordinary treatment, but none of that means every rumor becomes true or every preferred theory deserves to be treated as established fact. Serious scrutiny demands the same skepticism toward your own conclusions that you apply to prosecutors, investigators, and institutions, and that standard disappears once criminal cases become fandom. Victims become props, defendants become mascots, witnesses become targets, and tragedy becomes content for people whose audiences reward outrage over accuracy. The Karen Read circus did not teach people to question authority; it demonstrated how easily public certainty can be manufactured before factual certainty has been earned. If that blueprint continues spreading, the justice system risks becoming another spectator sport driven by algorithms, personalities, money, and whichever crowd can scream the loudest.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>898clancytrial,courtroomnews,criminalresponsibility,duxburymurders,duxburytragedy,insanitydefense,lindsayclancy,lindsayclancycase,lindsayclancynews,lindsayclancytrial,lindsayclancyupdates,maternalmentalhealth,murdertrial,postpartummentalhealth,postpartumpsychosis,trialupdates,truecrime,truecrimecommunity,truecrimenews,truecrimepodcasttruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/congress-names-epstein-s-filthy-14-part-3-9-3-26--74817173
What emerges is a pattern that has become impossible to ignore: highly sophisticated people repeatedly claim they saw very little, knew very little and understood even less while continuing to do business with Epstein, socialize with him or allegedly help bring women into his orbit. Those explanations become even harder to stomach after Epstein’s 2008 conviction, when his status as a sex offender was public and any continued relationship with him became a conscious choice. Massie’s list now puts fresh pressure on the Justice Department to stop treating these names like background noise and start confronting the money, communications, travel, introductions and testimony connected to each of them. The real question is not whether Epstein knew powerful people. Everyone already knows that. The question is why so many people deeply embedded in his life have spent years offering explanations while the government has offered so few answers.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74817173Thu, 03 Sep 2026 20:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciFor years, the Epstein story has been defined as much by the people who never seem to face meaningful scrutiny as by the two people who actually went to prison. That is why Thomas Massie’s decision to name fourteen alleged Epstein co-conspirators on...
What emerges is a pattern that has become impossible to ignore: highly sophisticated people repeatedly claim they saw very little, knew very little and understood even less while continuing to do business with Epstein, socialize with him or allegedly help bring women into his orbit. Those explanations become even harder to stomach after Epstein’s 2008 conviction, when his status as a sex offender was public and any continued relationship with him became a conscious choice. Massie’s list now puts fresh pressure on the Justice Department to stop treating these names like background noise and start confronting the money, communications, travel, introductions and testimony connected to each of them. The real question is not whether Epstein knew powerful people. Everyone already knows that. The question is why so many people deeply embedded in his life have spent years offering explanations while the government has offered so few answers.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1184epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/congress-names-epstein-s-filthy-14-part-2-9-3-26--74817174
What emerges is a pattern that has become impossible to ignore: highly sophisticated people repeatedly claim they saw very little, knew very little and understood even less while continuing to do business with Epstein, socialize with him or allegedly help bring women into his orbit. Those explanations become even harder to stomach after Epstein’s 2008 conviction, when his status as a sex offender was public and any continued relationship with him became a conscious choice. Massie’s list now puts fresh pressure on the Justice Department to stop treating these names like background noise and start confronting the money, communications, travel, introductions and testimony connected to each of them. The real question is not whether Epstein knew powerful people. Everyone already knows that. The question is why so many people deeply embedded in his life have spent years offering explanations while the government has offered so few answers.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74817174Thu, 03 Sep 2026 18:30:04 +0000Bobby CapucciFor years, the Epstein story has been defined as much by the people who never seem to face meaningful scrutiny as by the two people who actually went to prison. That is why Thomas Massie’s decision to name fourteen alleged Epstein co-conspirators on...
What emerges is a pattern that has become impossible to ignore: highly sophisticated people repeatedly claim they saw very little, knew very little and understood even less while continuing to do business with Epstein, socialize with him or allegedly help bring women into his orbit. Those explanations become even harder to stomach after Epstein’s 2008 conviction, when his status as a sex offender was public and any continued relationship with him became a conscious choice. Massie’s list now puts fresh pressure on the Justice Department to stop treating these names like background noise and start confronting the money, communications, travel, introductions and testimony connected to each of them. The real question is not whether Epstein knew powerful people. Everyone already knows that. The question is why so many people deeply embedded in his life have spent years offering explanations while the government has offered so few answers.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>738epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/congress-names-epstein-s-filthy-14-part-1-9-3-26--74817172
What emerges is a pattern that has become impossible to ignore: highly sophisticated people repeatedly claim they saw very little, knew very little and understood even less while continuing to do business with Epstein, socialize with him or allegedly help bring women into his orbit. Those explanations become even harder to stomach after Epstein’s 2008 conviction, when his status as a sex offender was public and any continued relationship with him became a conscious choice. Massie’s list now puts fresh pressure on the Justice Department to stop treating these names like background noise and start confronting the money, communications, travel, introductions and testimony connected to each of them. The real question is not whether Epstein knew powerful people. Everyone already knows that. The question is why so many people deeply embedded in his life have spent years offering explanations while the government has offered so few answers.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74817172Thu, 03 Sep 2026 16:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciFor years, the Epstein story has been defined as much by the people who never seem to face meaningful scrutiny as by the two people who actually went to prison. That is why Thomas Massie’s decision to name fourteen alleged Epstein co-conspirators on...
What emerges is a pattern that has become impossible to ignore: highly sophisticated people repeatedly claim they saw very little, knew very little and understood even less while continuing to do business with Epstein, socialize with him or allegedly help bring women into his orbit. Those explanations become even harder to stomach after Epstein’s 2008 conviction, when his status as a sex offender was public and any continued relationship with him became a conscious choice. Massie’s list now puts fresh pressure on the Justice Department to stop treating these names like background noise and start confronting the money, communications, travel, introductions and testimony connected to each of them. The real question is not whether Epstein knew powerful people. Everyone already knows that. The question is why so many people deeply embedded in his life have spent years offering explanations while the government has offered so few answers.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1006epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/thomas-massie-accuses-andrew-mountbatten-windsor-of-sex-crimes-in-the-united-states-9-3-26--74817171

The allegation centered on claims long made by Virginia Giuffre, who said Epstein trafficked her to Andrew for sex on multiple occasions when she was 17, including at Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse and on Little Saint James in the U.S. Virgin Islands. Andrew has repeatedly denied sexually abusing Giuffre and denied wrongdoing, and he settled her civil lawsuit in 2022 without admitting liability. What made Massie’s speech significant was that a sitting member of Congress was no longer treating Andrew merely as an embarrassing Epstein associate; he was publicly framing him as someone who should face direct criminal scrutiny in the United States. Massie also used the moment to argue that the government’s handling of the Epstein files remains incomplete, saying millions of documents are still being withheld and suggesting that naming powerful figures publicly may be one of the only ways to pressure the Justice Department into taking further action.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor is accused of 'committing sex crimes in the US' by congressman | Daily Mail Online

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74817171Thu, 03 Sep 2026 14:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciRep. Thomas Massie used a speech on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives to accuse Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor of committing sex crimes in the United States and to argue that he should be investigated and, if warranted, prosecuted. Massie...

The allegation centered on claims long made by Virginia Giuffre, who said Epstein trafficked her to Andrew for sex on multiple occasions when she was 17, including at Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse and on Little Saint James in the U.S. Virgin Islands. Andrew has repeatedly denied sexually abusing Giuffre and denied wrongdoing, and he settled her civil lawsuit in 2022 without admitting liability. What made Massie’s speech significant was that a sitting member of Congress was no longer treating Andrew merely as an embarrassing Epstein associate; he was publicly framing him as someone who should face direct criminal scrutiny in the United States. Massie also used the moment to argue that the government’s handling of the Epstein files remains incomplete, saying millions of documents are still being withheld and suggesting that naming powerful figures publicly may be one of the only ways to pressure the Justice Department into taking further action.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor is accused of 'committing sex crimes in the US' by congressman | Daily Mail Online

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>782epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-maxwell-transfer-document-raises-more-questions-than-answers-9-2-26--74796195
The release therefore provides documentation without providing transparency where it matters most. Maxwell’s move to a lower-security facility has already fueled questions about whether she received preferential treatment, whether her cooperation with federal authorities played any role, and what internal factors the Bureau of Prisons considered before approving the transfer. The newly obtained form does not establish that any improper deal or special arrangement occurred, but the decision to conceal the government’s stated reasoning guarantees that those questions will continue. Instead of resolving the controversy, the document underscores the same problem that has repeatedly surrounded the Epstein and Maxwell cases: records eventually emerge, but crucial portions remain withheld, leaving the public with proof that a consequential decision was made while the explanation for that decision remains behind black ink.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Ghislaine Maxwell’s Prison Transfer Form Released - Bloomberg

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74796195Thu, 03 Sep 2026 12:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciA newly released Bureau of Prisons document sheds more light on Ghislaine Maxwell’s controversial transfer to a minimum-security federal prison, but it stops short of answering the biggest question surrounding the move: why it happened. Bloomberg...
The release therefore provides documentation without providing transparency where it matters most. Maxwell’s move to a lower-security facility has already fueled questions about whether she received preferential treatment, whether her cooperation with federal authorities played any role, and what internal factors the Bureau of Prisons considered before approving the transfer. The newly obtained form does not establish that any improper deal or special arrangement occurred, but the decision to conceal the government’s stated reasoning guarantees that those questions will continue. Instead of resolving the controversy, the document underscores the same problem that has repeatedly surrounded the Epstein and Maxwell cases: records eventually emerge, but crucial portions remain withheld, leaving the public with proof that a consequential decision was made while the explanation for that decision remains behind black ink.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Ghislaine Maxwell’s Prison Transfer Form Released - Bloomberg

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>658epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-the-dive-into-his-life-online-9-3-26--74808359
That digital investigation became an important companion to the physical and forensic case because it gave authorities another way to test motive, planning, familiarity and movement. Prosecutors later relied heavily on cellphone records and other electronic evidence to help place Kohberger’s phone outside the Moscow area during parts of the night while also emphasizing that it stopped reporting to the cellular network during the critical murder window. Investigators also searched for evidence of online contact with the victims, surveillance of their social-media activity, searches related to the King Road house or the murders, and any attempt to delete or conceal digital information afterward. Not every online lead produced something incriminating, but the scale of the search showed that investigators were trying to build a complete digital portrait of Kohberger rather than relying on DNA or vehicle evidence alone.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74808359Thu, 03 Sep 2026 10:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciInvestigators dug deeply into Bryan Kohberger’s digital life as they tried to reconstruct who he was, what he was doing in the months before the murders and whether his online activity connected him in any way to Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana...
That digital investigation became an important companion to the physical and forensic case because it gave authorities another way to test motive, planning, familiarity and movement. Prosecutors later relied heavily on cellphone records and other electronic evidence to help place Kohberger’s phone outside the Moscow area during parts of the night while also emphasizing that it stopped reporting to the cellular network during the critical murder window. Investigators also searched for evidence of online contact with the victims, surveillance of their social-media activity, searches related to the King Road house or the murders, and any attempt to delete or conceal digital information afterward. Not every online lead produced something incriminating, but the scale of the search showed that investigators were trying to build a complete digital portrait of Kohberger rather than relying on DNA or vehicle evidence alone.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2444bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodlefalsefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-kaylee-s-goncalves-and-the-interviews-with-cnn-and-fox-9-3-26--74808358
The interviews also revealed the tension that had developed between the Goncalves family and authorities during the early stages of the investigation. The family questioned aspects of the official timeline, pressed for more transparency and made clear that they believed certain facts should be released if doing so could generate useful tips. At the same time, they defended their decision to speak publicly, arguing that media attention was one of the few tools available to families desperate for progress. Their appearances on CNN and Fox became a major part of the public narrative surrounding the case because they offered something official press conferences often did not: the raw frustration, grief and urgency of a family that had lost a daughter and was watching a massive murder investigation unfold without a suspect publicly identified.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74808358Thu, 03 Sep 2026 08:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn the weeks after the murders, the Goncalves family became one of the most visible and outspoken families connected to the case, giving interviews to CNN and Fox News as they tried to keep pressure on investigators and keep Kaylee, Madison, Xana and...
The interviews also revealed the tension that had developed between the Goncalves family and authorities during the early stages of the investigation. The family questioned aspects of the official timeline, pressed for more transparency and made clear that they believed certain facts should be released if doing so could generate useful tips. At the same time, they defended their decision to speak publicly, arguing that media attention was one of the few tools available to families desperate for progress. Their appearances on CNN and Fox became a major part of the public narrative surrounding the case because they offered something official press conferences often did not: the raw frustration, grief and urgency of a family that had lost a daughter and was watching a massive murder investigation unfold without a suspect publicly identified.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2922bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-kaylee-goncalves-and-the-tinder-yahoo-and-extreme-networks-warrants-9-2-26--74808360Investigators in the Bryan Kohberger case obtained warrants aimed at a surprisingly broad range of digital platforms connected to Kaylee Goncalves, including Tinder, Yahoo and Extreme Networks. The Tinder warrant sought account information and activity that could help detectives determine whether Goncalves had used the dating app, whether she had communicated with anyone relevant to the investigation and whether there was any connection between her online dating activity and the person who killed her. The Yahoo warrant was similarly focused on email and account records that could reveal communications, logins, stored information or other digital evidence tied to Goncalves. Investigators were not necessarily claiming that those companies held incriminating evidence; they were trying to preserve and examine every reasonable digital trail connected to her life before the murders.

The Extreme Networks warrant was more technical and reflected investigators’ effort to reconstruct devices and network activity associated with Goncalves and the King Road residence. Extreme Networks provides networking and wireless infrastructure, so records from that company could potentially help identify devices that connected to a network, when those connections occurred and what hardware was present. Taken together, the Tinder, Yahoo and Extreme Networks warrants showed just how expansive the digital investigation became: detectives were not limiting themselves to Kohberger’s phone or social-media accounts, but were digging into the victims’ own digital footprints to identify contacts, devices, communications and possible connections that might explain targeting or motive. The warrants also illustrated how, before investigators could know which digital trail mattered, they were collecting records across everything from dating apps and email accounts to the underlying network technology used by the people at the center of the case.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74808360Thu, 03 Sep 2026 06:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciInvestigators in the Bryan Kohberger case obtained warrants aimed at a surprisingly broad range of digital platforms connected to Kaylee Goncalves, including Tinder, Yahoo and Extreme Networks. The Tinder warrant sought account information and...Investigators in the Bryan Kohberger case obtained warrants aimed at a surprisingly broad range of digital platforms connected to Kaylee Goncalves, including Tinder, Yahoo and Extreme Networks. The Tinder warrant sought account information and activity that could help detectives determine whether Goncalves had used the dating app, whether she had communicated with anyone relevant to the investigation and whether there was any connection between her online dating activity and the person who killed her. The Yahoo warrant was similarly focused on email and account records that could reveal communications, logins, stored information or other digital evidence tied to Goncalves. Investigators were not necessarily claiming that those companies held incriminating evidence; they were trying to preserve and examine every reasonable digital trail connected to her life before the murders.

The Extreme Networks warrant was more technical and reflected investigators’ effort to reconstruct devices and network activity associated with Goncalves and the King Road residence. Extreme Networks provides networking and wireless infrastructure, so records from that company could potentially help identify devices that connected to a network, when those connections occurred and what hardware was present. Taken together, the Tinder, Yahoo and Extreme Networks warrants showed just how expansive the digital investigation became: detectives were not limiting themselves to Kohberger’s phone or social-media accounts, but were digging into the victims’ own digital footprints to identify contacts, devices, communications and possible connections that might explain targeting or motive. The warrants also illustrated how, before investigators could know which digital trail mattered, they were collecting records across everything from dating apps and email accounts to the underlying network technology used by the people at the center of the case.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2403bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-jennifer-coffindaffer-discusses-the-murders-in-moscow--74808350Former FBI agent and profiler Jim Clemente said the person responsible for killing Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin was almost certainly a man, arguing that the physical demands of stabbing four people to death made a female attacker highly unlikely. Clemente emphasized that this was not a quick or easy crime, particularly because the killer had to overpower multiple victims in close quarters and continue attacking despite the resistance and physical exertion involved. He said the nature of the wounds and the number of victims suggested a tremendous amount of force, stamina and rage, and he believed the killer was likely someone strong enough to carry out the attacks without immediately losing control of the situation. At that stage of the investigation, authorities had not publicly identified a suspect, so Clemente’s comments were part of the broader effort by outside experts to infer characteristics of the killer from the crime itself.

Clemente also said the brutality of the murders suggested that the attack was personal or emotionally driven rather than random, though he cautioned that profilers could only work from the limited facts that had been made public. He believed the killer may have known at least one of the victims or had some specific reason for targeting the house, and he argued that the offender likely entered with a clear intention to kill rather than stumbling into a confrontation. His analysis reflected the atmosphere surrounding the case in December 2022, when investigators were still withholding most of what they knew and the public was left trying to understand how one person could enter a house occupied by six people, kill four of them with a knife and escape without being immediately identified.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74808350Thu, 03 Sep 2026 04:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciFormer FBI agent and profiler Jim Clemente said the person responsible for killing Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin was almost certainly a man, arguing that the physical demands of stabbing four people to death made a...Former FBI agent and profiler Jim Clemente said the person responsible for killing Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin was almost certainly a man, arguing that the physical demands of stabbing four people to death made a female attacker highly unlikely. Clemente emphasized that this was not a quick or easy crime, particularly because the killer had to overpower multiple victims in close quarters and continue attacking despite the resistance and physical exertion involved. He said the nature of the wounds and the number of victims suggested a tremendous amount of force, stamina and rage, and he believed the killer was likely someone strong enough to carry out the attacks without immediately losing control of the situation. At that stage of the investigation, authorities had not publicly identified a suspect, so Clemente’s comments were part of the broader effort by outside experts to infer characteristics of the killer from the crime itself.

Clemente also said the brutality of the murders suggested that the attack was personal or emotionally driven rather than random, though he cautioned that profilers could only work from the limited facts that had been made public. He believed the killer may have known at least one of the victims or had some specific reason for targeting the house, and he argued that the offender likely entered with a clear intention to kill rather than stumbling into a confrontation. His analysis reflected the atmosphere surrounding the case in December 2022, when investigators were still withholding most of what they knew and the public was left trying to understand how one person could enter a house occupied by six people, kill four of them with a knife and escape without being immediately identified.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>757falsefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-can-the-alleged-murder-weapon-be-tracked-even-without-possession--74786061
The analysis also underscored why the missing murder weapon did not necessarily cripple the investigation. Prosecutors could still build a case around forensic pathology, DNA, surveillance footage, cellphone data, witness testimony and other physical evidence even without producing the knife itself. The expert cautioned, however, that identifying a weapon type from wounds was not the same as proving that one specific knife was used, and the absence of the actual weapon would still leave room for defense challenges. In practical terms, investigators did not need to recover the knife to develop a strong theory about what kind of weapon caused the injuries, but finding it would have provided a much more direct evidentiary link.



to contact me:

bobbycapuci@protonmail.com















Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74786061Thu, 03 Sep 2026 02:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciA forensic expert said investigators in the University of Idaho murders could potentially identify the type of knife used to kill Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin even if the weapon itself was never recovered. The expert...
The analysis also underscored why the missing murder weapon did not necessarily cripple the investigation. Prosecutors could still build a case around forensic pathology, DNA, surveillance footage, cellphone data, witness testimony and other physical evidence even without producing the knife itself. The expert cautioned, however, that identifying a weapon type from wounds was not the same as proving that one specific knife was used, and the absence of the actual weapon would still leave room for defense challenges. In practical terms, investigators did not need to recover the knife to develop a strong theory about what kind of weapon caused the injuries, but finding it would have provided a much more direct evidentiary link.



to contact me:

bobbycapuci@protonmail.com















Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>631bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-will-stand-trial-for-charlie-kirk-s-murder-9-2-26--74817727

The ruling followed a five-day preliminary hearing in July in which prosecutors laid out what they described as a mountain of evidence against Robinson. That evidence included DNA and a handwritten note prosecutors allege Robinson left for his romantic partner in which he claimed responsibility for killing Kirk. Prosecutors also argued that the trajectory and location of the shot showed Robinson allegedly knew he was firing into a densely packed public event where a missed shot could have killed someone else. Kirk’s family called the ruling an important step toward justice, while Robinson showed no visible reaction as the judge announced his decision. With the aggravated murder charge intact and the death penalty still on the table, the case now moves from the preliminary stage into the full trial process, where prosecutors will have to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74817727Thu, 03 Sep 2026 00:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciTyler Robinson’s case is officially headed to trial after Utah District Judge Tony Graf ruled that prosecutors presented enough evidence to move forward on the aggravated murder charge in the killing of Charlie Kirk. Prosecutors argued that Robinson...

The ruling followed a five-day preliminary hearing in July in which prosecutors laid out what they described as a mountain of evidence against Robinson. That evidence included DNA and a handwritten note prosecutors allege Robinson left for his romantic partner in which he claimed responsibility for killing Kirk. Prosecutors also argued that the trajectory and location of the shot showed Robinson allegedly knew he was firing into a densely packed public event where a missed shot could have killed someone else. Kirk’s family called the ruling an important step toward justice, while Robinson showed no visible reaction as the judge announced his decision. With the aggravated murder charge intact and the death penalty still on the table, the case now moves from the preliminary stage into the full trial process, where prosecutors will have to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>646breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-is-back-in-court-as-judge-weighs-whether-the-case-goes-to-trial-9-2-26--74796191
A major issue is whether the shooting endangered people other than Kirk, which is critical to the aggravated murder allegation. Prosecutors argue that numerous people were inside a "zone of danger" when the shot was fired from a rooftop more than 400 feet away, while the defense contends the shooter struck the intended target and did not place others in sufficient danger to justify the enhanced charge. Prosecutors have also pointed to DNA they say connected Robinson to the suspected murder weapon, an engraved cartridge they characterize as politically motivated, alleged writings and messages attributed to Robinson, and statements from his romantic partner, Lance Twiggs. Investigators also say Robinson posted in an online chat room shortly before surrendering that he was responsible for what happened at UVU. The defense has challenged the reliability of some of the DNA evidence and disputes whether prosecutors can establish the political motivation necessary for additional sentencing enhancements, leaving Graf’s ruling as the next major turning point in determining whether the case proceeds toward a capital murder trial.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:


Judge to decide if Charlie Kirk murder case will go to trial | AP News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74796191Wed, 02 Sep 2026 23:32:12 +0000Bobby CapucciA Utah judge is set to decide whether prosecutors have presented enough evidence to send Tyler Robinson to trial for the aggravated murder of Charlie Kirk, a charge that could make Robinson eligible for the death penalty. The decision follows an...
A major issue is whether the shooting endangered people other than Kirk, which is critical to the aggravated murder allegation. Prosecutors argue that numerous people were inside a "zone of danger" when the shot was fired from a rooftop more than 400 feet away, while the defense contends the shooter struck the intended target and did not place others in sufficient danger to justify the enhanced charge. Prosecutors have also pointed to DNA they say connected Robinson to the suspected murder weapon, an engraved cartridge they characterize as politically motivated, alleged writings and messages attributed to Robinson, and statements from his romantic partner, Lance Twiggs. Investigators also say Robinson posted in an online chat room shortly before surrendering that he was responsible for what happened at UVU. The defense has challenged the reliability of some of the DNA evidence and disputes whether prosecutors can establish the political motivation necessary for additional sentencing enhancements, leaving Graf’s ruling as the next major turning point in determining whether the case proceeds toward a capital murder trial.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:


Judge to decide if Charlie Kirk murder case will go to trial | AP News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>863breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/jes-staley-and-the-transcripts-from-his-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-7-9-2-26--74796194
The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein’s cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley’s professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.


to contact me:


bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74796194Wed, 02 Sep 2026 20:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe transcripts from Jes Staley’s July 24, 2026 interview with the House Oversight Committee revealed just how deep and personal his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein became, while also exposing contradictions in the way Staley had described that...
The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein’s cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley’s professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.


to contact me:


bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>790epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/jes-staley-and-the-transcripts-from-his-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-6-9-2-26--74796192
The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein’s cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley’s professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.


to contact me:


bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74796192Wed, 02 Sep 2026 18:30:05 +0000Bobby CapucciThe transcripts from Jes Staley’s July 24, 2026 interview with the House Oversight Committee revealed just how deep and personal his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein became, while also exposing contradictions in the way Staley had described that...
The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein’s cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley’s professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.


to contact me:


bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>652epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-the-experts-behind-the-case-against-bryan-kohberger-part-11-9-2-26--74807338The State’s rebuttal to defense expert Matthew Noedel focused on challenging the significance of his conclusions about the absence of victim blood or other victim-linked biological material in Bryan Kohberger’s car and residence. Noedel had emphasized that investigators conducted an extensive search of Kohberger’s vehicle and apartment and did not find blood tied to Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle or Ethan Chapin. Prosecutors responded that the absence of detectable victim blood did not establish that Kohberger had not been inside the King Road house, nor did it prove that biological material could not have been removed, degraded or simply never transferred in a recoverable quantity. The rebuttal also cautioned against treating a negative finding as affirmative proof of innocence, arguing that forensic testing can establish what was detected in a particular sample but cannot necessarily reconstruct every transfer event that did or did not occur.

The State also pushed back on Noedel’s interpretation of secondary transfer and contamination issues, arguing that his report went beyond what the laboratory results could reliably support. Prosecutors stressed that transfer of DNA or blood is highly dependent on variables such as the amount of biological material present, the surfaces involved, subsequent cleaning, time, environmental conditions and the way evidence was handled. In other words, they argued that Noedel was using the lack of victim DNA in Kohberger’s vehicle and apartment to suggest a broader exculpatory conclusion that the science itself did not require. The rebuttal was therefore less about disputing the raw laboratory results and more about disputing the inference Noedel drew from them: everyone agreed that victim blood was not found in the car or apartment, but the State argued that this fact alone did not meaningfully exclude Kohberger from the murders or undermine the prosecution’s larger evidentiary case.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

030326+REDACTED+Exhibits+S-1+through+S-13+to+States+Amended+Supp+Resp+to+Rqst+for+Disc+RE+Expert+Testimony.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74807338Wed, 02 Sep 2026 16:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe State’s rebuttal to defense expert Matthew Noedel focused on challenging the significance of his conclusions about the absence of victim blood or other victim-linked biological material in Bryan Kohberger’s car and residence. Noedel had emphasized...The State’s rebuttal to defense expert Matthew Noedel focused on challenging the significance of his conclusions about the absence of victim blood or other victim-linked biological material in Bryan Kohberger’s car and residence. Noedel had emphasized that investigators conducted an extensive search of Kohberger’s vehicle and apartment and did not find blood tied to Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle or Ethan Chapin. Prosecutors responded that the absence of detectable victim blood did not establish that Kohberger had not been inside the King Road house, nor did it prove that biological material could not have been removed, degraded or simply never transferred in a recoverable quantity. The rebuttal also cautioned against treating a negative finding as affirmative proof of innocence, arguing that forensic testing can establish what was detected in a particular sample but cannot necessarily reconstruct every transfer event that did or did not occur.

The State also pushed back on Noedel’s interpretation of secondary transfer and contamination issues, arguing that his report went beyond what the laboratory results could reliably support. Prosecutors stressed that transfer of DNA or blood is highly dependent on variables such as the amount of biological material present, the surfaces involved, subsequent cleaning, time, environmental conditions and the way evidence was handled. In other words, they argued that Noedel was using the lack of victim DNA in Kohberger’s vehicle and apartment to suggest a broader exculpatory conclusion that the science itself did not require. The rebuttal was therefore less about disputing the raw laboratory results and more about disputing the inference Noedel drew from them: everyone agreed that victim blood was not found in the car or apartment, but the State argued that this fact alone did not meaningfully exclude Kohberger from the murders or undermine the prosecution’s larger evidentiary case.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

030326+REDACTED+Exhibits+S-1+through+S-13+to+States+Amended+Supp+Resp+to+Rqst+for+Disc+RE+Expert+Testimony.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>722epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/thomas-massie-names-14-epstein-co-conspirators-on-the-house-floor-9-2-26--74796193
At the same time, Massie launched a discharge petition aimed at forcing a House vote on the Epstein Files Transparency Act II, legislation designed to strengthen the disclosure requirements Congress imposed in 2025. The proposal would give Epstein survivors, state and local prosecutors and members of Congress greater power to obtain unredacted federal records and sue the attorney general when they believe documents have been improperly withheld, concealed, delayed or redacted. Members of Congress would be entitled to request complete records, while victims could seek files concerning themselves and prosecutors could obtain information necessary for ongoing criminal investigations. Massie and other supporters maintain that the Justice Department continues to withhold millions of pages or maintain unjustified redactions despite the original transparency law, while DOJ insists it complied after releasing roughly 3.5 million pages along with thousands of videos and images. Massie now needs 218 House signatures on the discharge petition to bypass leadership and force the legislation onto the floor for a vote.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Thomas Massie Names 14 People as Epstein ‘Co-Conspirators,’ Moves to Force House Vote | Law Commentary

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74796193Wed, 02 Sep 2026 14:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciRep. Thomas Massie escalated his push for accountability in the Jeffrey Epstein scandal by naming 14 people on the House floor whom he described as Epstein “co-conspirators” who should be investigated and potentially prosecuted. The names included Jes...
At the same time, Massie launched a discharge petition aimed at forcing a House vote on the Epstein Files Transparency Act II, legislation designed to strengthen the disclosure requirements Congress imposed in 2025. The proposal would give Epstein survivors, state and local prosecutors and members of Congress greater power to obtain unredacted federal records and sue the attorney general when they believe documents have been improperly withheld, concealed, delayed or redacted. Members of Congress would be entitled to request complete records, while victims could seek files concerning themselves and prosecutors could obtain information necessary for ongoing criminal investigations. Massie and other supporters maintain that the Justice Department continues to withhold millions of pages or maintain unjustified redactions despite the original transparency law, while DOJ insists it complied after releasing roughly 3.5 million pages along with thousands of videos and images. Massie now needs 218 House signatures on the discharge petition to bypass leadership and force the legislation onto the floor for a vote.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Thomas Massie Names 14 People as Epstein ‘Co-Conspirators,’ Moves to Force House Vote | Law Commentary

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>803epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/woman-who-says-epstein-flew-her-to-britain-may-now-cooperate-against-andrew-9-1-26--74775039
The development could become significant because British police have already been examining allegations involving Andrew and have publicly encouraged victims and survivors to come forward. The woman’s claims are separate from Virginia Giuffre’s allegations, but they follow a similar pattern: Epstein allegedly transporting a woman into Andrew’s orbit for sex and using royal residences as part of that access. Andrew has denied wrongdoing and has not been charged in connection with these allegations. If the woman does agree to testify, however, investigators would gain something they have not previously had from her: direct, first-person evidence about what she says happened at Royal Lodge and how Epstein allegedly facilitated the encounter. That could turn what had largely remained an untested allegation into a much more consequential part of the continuing scrutiny surrounding Andrew and Epstein.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

Woman who claims Epstein flew her to the UK to have sex with Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor may now testify against him after all | Daily Mail Online

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74775039Wed, 02 Sep 2026 12:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciAn unnamed woman who says Jeffrey Epstein flew her to Britain in 2010 for a sexual encounter with Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor may now be willing to cooperate with investigators after previously resisting the idea. The woman, who was in her 20s at the...
The development could become significant because British police have already been examining allegations involving Andrew and have publicly encouraged victims and survivors to come forward. The woman’s claims are separate from Virginia Giuffre’s allegations, but they follow a similar pattern: Epstein allegedly transporting a woman into Andrew’s orbit for sex and using royal residences as part of that access. Andrew has denied wrongdoing and has not been charged in connection with these allegations. If the woman does agree to testify, however, investigators would gain something they have not previously had from her: direct, first-person evidence about what she says happened at Royal Lodge and how Epstein allegedly facilitated the encounter. That could turn what had largely remained an untested allegation into a much more consequential part of the continuing scrutiny surrounding Andrew and Epstein.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

Woman who claims Epstein flew her to the UK to have sex with Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor may now testify against him after all | Daily Mail Online

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>719epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-enormous-increase-in-budget-for-police-in-idaho-following-the-murders-9-2-26--74786049
That pressure carried into the state budget process, where the Moscow murders became part of the justification for increasing funding available to Idaho State Police. Lawmakers were forced to confront the reality that a sprawling homicide investigation could require months of intensive work and substantial forensic and investigative support, all while the agency remained responsible for cases elsewhere in Idaho. The increased funding reflected a broader effort to strengthen the state’s ability to respond to major crimes without forcing other investigations or services to absorb the cost. In that sense, the Moscow murders had consequences well beyond the criminal case itself, helping reshape the conversation in Boise about how much money and manpower Idaho needed to devote to complex, high-profile investigations.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74786049Wed, 02 Sep 2026 10:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin did more than trigger one of the most intensive homicide investigations in Idaho history; they also exposed the financial strain a case of that scale could place on state...
That pressure carried into the state budget process, where the Moscow murders became part of the justification for increasing funding available to Idaho State Police. Lawmakers were forced to confront the reality that a sprawling homicide investigation could require months of intensive work and substantial forensic and investigative support, all while the agency remained responsible for cases elsewhere in Idaho. The increased funding reflected a broader effort to strengthen the state’s ability to respond to major crimes without forcing other investigations or services to absorb the cost. In that sense, the Moscow murders had consequences well beyond the criminal case itself, helping reshape the conversation in Boise about how much money and manpower Idaho needed to devote to complex, high-profile investigations.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2767falsefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-kohberger-accuses-the-state-of-disclosure-violations-and-idaho-responds-9-2-26--74786050

That disagreement produced a steady back-and-forth in court, with each side accusing the other of overstating the problem. The defense argued that simply dumping huge volumes of material did not satisfy the state’s obligations if important records were missing, difficult to identify, or produced too late to be meaningfully examined. Prosecutors countered that the investigation was massive, involved numerous agencies and experts, and that some requested material either did not exist, was not in the state’s possession, or was still being gathered from outside entities. Judge John Judge was repeatedly asked to referee those disputes, ordering additional disclosures in some instances while declining to accept the defense’s broader suggestion that prosecutors were systematically hiding evidence. The result was an ongoing discovery battle that became one of the defining procedural fights of the pretrial case, with Kohberger’s lawyers arguing that the state’s disclosure problems threatened the fairness of the proceedings and prosecutors maintaining that they were meeting their obligations in an extraordinarily complex prosecution.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74786050Wed, 02 Sep 2026 08:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe Bryan Kohberger case became consumed by repeated discovery disputes as the defense accused prosecutors of failing to turn over evidence quickly enough, completely enough, or in a form that could actually be used to prepare for trial. Anne Taylor...

That disagreement produced a steady back-and-forth in court, with each side accusing the other of overstating the problem. The defense argued that simply dumping huge volumes of material did not satisfy the state’s obligations if important records were missing, difficult to identify, or produced too late to be meaningfully examined. Prosecutors countered that the investigation was massive, involved numerous agencies and experts, and that some requested material either did not exist, was not in the state’s possession, or was still being gathered from outside entities. Judge John Judge was repeatedly asked to referee those disputes, ordering additional disclosures in some instances while declining to accept the defense’s broader suggestion that prosecutors were systematically hiding evidence. The result was an ongoing discovery battle that became one of the defining procedural fights of the pretrial case, with Kohberger’s lawyers arguing that the state’s disclosure problems threatened the fairness of the proceedings and prosecutors maintaining that they were meeting their obligations in an extraordinarily complex prosecution.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2573bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-judge-john-judge-warns-the-media-in-moscow-about-their-behavior-in-court-9-2-26--74770787
When the fight over cameras intensified later that year, Judge stopped short of banning them but delivered another pointed warning about how reporters, photographers and spectators were expected to behave. He urged everyone covering the case to exercise “dignity” and “restraint,” emphasizing that the extraordinary public interest surrounding Kohberger did not give the media license to turn every movement, facial expression or document on counsel’s table into content. Judge attempted to balance the public’s right to observe one of the country’s most closely watched criminal cases against Kohberger’s right to a fair proceeding, but his message to the press was unmistakable: courtroom access was a privilege governed by the court, and if the media could not respect the boundaries he imposed, he was willing to tighten those restrictions.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74770787Wed, 02 Sep 2026 08:13:48 +0000Bobby CapucciJudge John Judge repeatedly warned members of the media covering Bryan Kohberger’s case that their courtroom access came with rules and that he was prepared to restrict or eliminate cameras if those rules continued to be tested. During a June 2023...
When the fight over cameras intensified later that year, Judge stopped short of banning them but delivered another pointed warning about how reporters, photographers and spectators were expected to behave. He urged everyone covering the case to exercise “dignity” and “restraint,” emphasizing that the extraordinary public interest surrounding Kohberger did not give the media license to turn every movement, facial expression or document on counsel’s table into content. Judge attempted to balance the public’s right to observe one of the country’s most closely watched criminal cases against Kohberger’s right to a fair proceeding, but his message to the press was unmistakable: courtroom access was a privilege governed by the court, and if the media could not respect the boundaries he imposed, he was willing to tighten those restrictions.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2470bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-the-fear-that-the-case-would-turn-cold--74786062
The larger concern was that the Idaho murders were unfolding against a grim national backdrop in which homicide clearance rates had fallen dramatically and unsolved killings could linger for decades. The discussion drew comparisons to older cold cases, including the Lewis Clark Valley murders, the Burger Chef murders and the then-still-developing Delphi investigation, all of which demonstrated the emotional damage prolonged uncertainty could inflict on families and entire communities. The absence of an arrest in Moscow also created a vacuum that internet sleuths quickly filled with rumors, accusations and speculation about people police had already ruled out, including surviving roommates, an ex-boyfriend and the so-called “hoodie guy.” At that point in December 2022, the fear was not simply that the killer might escape justice, but that every passing day without answers could deepen mistrust, paranoia and grief in a community already traumatized by the murders.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74786062Wed, 02 Sep 2026 04:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciOne month after Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin were murdered in Moscow, Idaho, investigators still had not announced a suspect, made an arrest or recovered the murder weapon, fueling fears that the case could...
The larger concern was that the Idaho murders were unfolding against a grim national backdrop in which homicide clearance rates had fallen dramatically and unsolved killings could linger for decades. The discussion drew comparisons to older cold cases, including the Lewis Clark Valley murders, the Burger Chef murders and the then-still-developing Delphi investigation, all of which demonstrated the emotional damage prolonged uncertainty could inflict on families and entire communities. The absence of an arrest in Moscow also created a vacuum that internet sleuths quickly filled with rumors, accusations and speculation about people police had already ruled out, including surviving roommates, an ex-boyfriend and the so-called “hoodie guy.” At that point in December 2022, the fear was not simply that the killer might escape justice, but that every passing day without answers could deepen mistrust, paranoia and grief in a community already traumatized by the murders.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2032bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-were-the-murders-in-moscow-a-thrill-kill--74786060
Ramsland’s comments drew additional attention because of her prior academic connection to Kohberger and her extensive work studying violent offenders and serial killers. Her analysis suggested that, if the murders were indeed driven by thrill-seeking, the attack could have been less about the individual victims and more about the offender’s desire to experience domination, fear and the act of killing itself. Still, she cautioned against treating that theory as fact without more evidence, particularly because many details about Kohberger’s behavior, planning and relationship to the victims had not yet been fully established. The “thrill kill” theory therefore remained one possible psychological explanation rather than a proven motive in the Idaho murders.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74786060Wed, 02 Sep 2026 02:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciForensic psychologist Katherine Ramsland said Bryan Kohberger may have been pursuing what she described as a “thrill kill” when the four University of Idaho students were murdered in Moscow. Ramsland, who had taught Kohberger at DeSales University,...
Ramsland’s comments drew additional attention because of her prior academic connection to Kohberger and her extensive work studying violent offenders and serial killers. Her analysis suggested that, if the murders were indeed driven by thrill-seeking, the attack could have been less about the individual victims and more about the offender’s desire to experience domination, fear and the act of killing itself. Still, she cautioned against treating that theory as fact without more evidence, particularly because many details about Kohberger’s behavior, planning and relationship to the victims had not yet been fully established. The “thrill kill” theory therefore remained one possible psychological explanation rather than a proven motive in the Idaho murders.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>662bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/jes-staley-and-the-transcripts-from-his-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-5-9-1-26--74781579
The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein’s cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley’s professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.


to contact me:


bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74781579Wed, 02 Sep 2026 00:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe transcripts from Jes Staley’s July 24, 2026 interview with the House Oversight Committee revealed just how deep and personal his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein became, while also exposing contradictions in the way Staley had described that...
The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein’s cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley’s professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.


to contact me:


bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>696epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/jes-staley-and-the-transcripts-from-his-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-4-9-1-26--74781580
The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein’s cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley’s professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.


to contact me:


bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74781580Tue, 01 Sep 2026 22:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe transcripts from Jes Staley’s July 24, 2026 interview with the House Oversight Committee revealed just how deep and personal his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein became, while also exposing contradictions in the way Staley had described that...
The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein’s cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley’s professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.


to contact me:


bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>797epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/sarah-ferguson-reportedly-plans-tell-all-interview-over-jeffrey-epstein-links-9-1-26--74775038
The potential interview would also come at a particularly sensitive moment for the wider royal family, with Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor already facing renewed attention over Epstein and with Ferguson increasingly being pulled back into the same orbit of controversy. The report suggested that advisers understood she would face difficult questions not only about Epstein himself, but also about her relationship with Andrew and the extent to which both remained connected to people inside Epstein’s circle. No interview had yet been formally announced, but the prospect of Ferguson publicly addressing the scandal signaled that the Epstein issue was once again becoming impossible for her to avoid. Rather than remaining a historical embarrassment, her association with Epstein was re-emerging as an active public-relations problem with fresh questions still demanding answers.





to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Sarah Ferguson is 'lined up for a tell-all TV interview' as she returns to Britain 'in the next few days' after fallout over Epstein links | Daily Mail Online

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74775038Tue, 01 Sep 2026 20:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciSarah Ferguson is reportedly preparing to return to Britain within days and could give a major television interview addressing the renewed fallout over her past ties to Jeffrey Epstein. According to the report, Ferguson has been considering a sit-down...
The potential interview would also come at a particularly sensitive moment for the wider royal family, with Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor already facing renewed attention over Epstein and with Ferguson increasingly being pulled back into the same orbit of controversy. The report suggested that advisers understood she would face difficult questions not only about Epstein himself, but also about her relationship with Andrew and the extent to which both remained connected to people inside Epstein’s circle. No interview had yet been formally announced, but the prospect of Ferguson publicly addressing the scandal signaled that the Epstein issue was once again becoming impossible for her to avoid. Rather than remaining a historical embarrassment, her association with Epstein was re-emerging as an active public-relations problem with fresh questions still demanding answers.





to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Sarah Ferguson is 'lined up for a tell-all TV interview' as she returns to Britain 'in the next few days' after fallout over Epstein links | Daily Mail Online

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>645epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/legal-experts-see-little-room-left-for-maxwell-to-overturn-conviction-9-1-26--74775037
That leaves presidential clemency as the most obvious remaining route to freedom, although even that appears politically fraught. Legal experts said Maxwell could ultimately seek a pardon or commutation from President Donald Trump, but Republican strategists, survivor advocates and lawmakers warned that such a move would be extraordinarily difficult to defend given Trump’s promises about Epstein transparency and the continuing controversy over withheld or heavily redacted records. Trump has refused to definitively rule a pardon in or out, while Maxwell’s family says no formal application has been submitted because they believe her legal remedies must be exhausted first. Survivors and their advocates argue that clemency would amount to another profound betrayal, especially after Maxwell’s controversial transfer to a lower-security facility and Todd Blanche’s interview with her. So while Maxwell technically still has a few procedural moves available, the larger picture is clear: her chances of overturning the conviction through the courts are approaching exhaustion, and any realistic hope of early release may increasingly depend on presidential intervention rather than another judicial victory.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Ghislaine Maxwell has virtually run out of legal routes to overturn conviction, experts say | Ghislaine Maxwell | The Guardian

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74775037Tue, 01 Sep 2026 18:30:04 +0000Bobby CapucciGhislaine Maxwell has virtually exhausted the traditional legal avenues available to overturn her 2021 conviction and 20-year sentence. U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer recently rejected her latest collateral attack, finding that her constitutional...
That leaves presidential clemency as the most obvious remaining route to freedom, although even that appears politically fraught. Legal experts said Maxwell could ultimately seek a pardon or commutation from President Donald Trump, but Republican strategists, survivor advocates and lawmakers warned that such a move would be extraordinarily difficult to defend given Trump’s promises about Epstein transparency and the continuing controversy over withheld or heavily redacted records. Trump has refused to definitively rule a pardon in or out, while Maxwell’s family says no formal application has been submitted because they believe her legal remedies must be exhausted first. Survivors and their advocates argue that clemency would amount to another profound betrayal, especially after Maxwell’s controversial transfer to a lower-security facility and Todd Blanche’s interview with her. So while Maxwell technically still has a few procedural moves available, the larger picture is clear: her chances of overturning the conviction through the courts are approaching exhaustion, and any realistic hope of early release may increasingly depend on presidential intervention rather than another judicial victory.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Ghislaine Maxwell has virtually run out of legal routes to overturn conviction, experts say | Ghislaine Maxwell | The Guardian

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>907epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-the-experts-behind-the-case-against-bryan-kohberger-part-10-8-31-26--74770355The State’s rebuttal to defense expert Matthew Noedel focused on challenging the significance of his conclusions about the absence of victim blood or other victim-linked biological material in Bryan Kohberger’s car and residence. Noedel had emphasized that investigators conducted an extensive search of Kohberger’s vehicle and apartment and did not find blood tied to Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle or Ethan Chapin. Prosecutors responded that the absence of detectable victim blood did not establish that Kohberger had not been inside the King Road house, nor did it prove that biological material could not have been removed, degraded or simply never transferred in a recoverable quantity. The rebuttal also cautioned against treating a negative finding as affirmative proof of innocence, arguing that forensic testing can establish what was detected in a particular sample but cannot necessarily reconstruct every transfer event that did or did not occur.

The State also pushed back on Noedel’s interpretation of secondary transfer and contamination issues, arguing that his report went beyond what the laboratory results could reliably support. Prosecutors stressed that transfer of DNA or blood is highly dependent on variables such as the amount of biological material present, the surfaces involved, subsequent cleaning, time, environmental conditions and the way evidence was handled. In other words, they argued that Noedel was using the lack of victim DNA in Kohberger’s vehicle and apartment to suggest a broader exculpatory conclusion that the science itself did not require. The rebuttal was therefore less about disputing the raw laboratory results and more about disputing the inference Noedel drew from them: everyone agreed that victim blood was not found in the car or apartment, but the State argued that this fact alone did not meaningfully exclude Kohberger from the murders or undermine the prosecution’s larger evidentiary case.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

030326+REDACTED+Exhibits+S-1+through+S-13+to+States+Amended+Supp+Resp+to+Rqst+for+Disc+RE+Expert+Testimony.pdf









Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74770355Tue, 01 Sep 2026 16:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe State’s rebuttal to defense expert Matthew Noedel focused on challenging the significance of his conclusions about the absence of victim blood or other victim-linked biological material in Bryan Kohberger’s car and residence. Noedel had emphasized...The State’s rebuttal to defense expert Matthew Noedel focused on challenging the significance of his conclusions about the absence of victim blood or other victim-linked biological material in Bryan Kohberger’s car and residence. Noedel had emphasized that investigators conducted an extensive search of Kohberger’s vehicle and apartment and did not find blood tied to Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle or Ethan Chapin. Prosecutors responded that the absence of detectable victim blood did not establish that Kohberger had not been inside the King Road house, nor did it prove that biological material could not have been removed, degraded or simply never transferred in a recoverable quantity. The rebuttal also cautioned against treating a negative finding as affirmative proof of innocence, arguing that forensic testing can establish what was detected in a particular sample but cannot necessarily reconstruct every transfer event that did or did not occur.

The State also pushed back on Noedel’s interpretation of secondary transfer and contamination issues, arguing that his report went beyond what the laboratory results could reliably support. Prosecutors stressed that transfer of DNA or blood is highly dependent on variables such as the amount of biological material present, the surfaces involved, subsequent cleaning, time, environmental conditions and the way evidence was handled. In other words, they argued that Noedel was using the lack of victim DNA in Kohberger’s vehicle and apartment to suggest a broader exculpatory conclusion that the science itself did not require. The rebuttal was therefore less about disputing the raw laboratory results and more about disputing the inference Noedel drew from them: everyone agreed that victim blood was not found in the car or apartment, but the State argued that this fact alone did not meaningfully exclude Kohberger from the murders or undermine the prosecution’s larger evidentiary case.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

030326+REDACTED+Exhibits+S-1+through+S-13+to+States+Amended+Supp+Resp+to+Rqst+for+Disc+RE+Expert+Testimony.pdf









Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>639bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/bryan-kohberger-s-new-lawyer-targets-the-constitutionality-of-his-guilty-plea-9-1-26--74781504
The new defense team is also attacking the structure of the proceedings themselves. Idaho attorney Greg Rauch, who was appointed to represent Kohberger, has asked that Hippler be removed from the case and that the proceedings be transferred back to Moscow, arguing that questions surrounding the judge’s impartiality must be resolved before Kohberger’s constitutional claims are heard. The motion points to Hippler’s earlier refusal to give Kohberger’s trial attorneys additional preparation time and to unusually harsh comments the judge made about Kohberger at sentencing. Prosecutors, meanwhile, have requested the transcript of Kohberger’s July 2025 plea hearing, apparently preparing to use Kohberger’s own sworn statements in court to undermine his new assertion that the plea was involuntary. What had appeared to be a closed case after Kohberger admitted responsibility and received four consecutive life sentences has therefore reopened into a significant post-conviction battle, with his new attorneys signaling that the circumstances surrounding the plea, his former defense team and potentially previously undisclosed information could become central issues in court.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


Bryan Kohberger's new lawyer targets guilty plea constitutionality | Fox News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74781504Tue, 01 Sep 2026 14:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBryan Kohberger’s newest attorney, Jason Goldman, says the immediate focus of the defense is whether Kohberger’s 2025 guilty plea was constitutionally valid and truly entered knowingly and voluntarily. Kohberger pleaded guilty to murdering Madison...
The new defense team is also attacking the structure of the proceedings themselves. Idaho attorney Greg Rauch, who was appointed to represent Kohberger, has asked that Hippler be removed from the case and that the proceedings be transferred back to Moscow, arguing that questions surrounding the judge’s impartiality must be resolved before Kohberger’s constitutional claims are heard. The motion points to Hippler’s earlier refusal to give Kohberger’s trial attorneys additional preparation time and to unusually harsh comments the judge made about Kohberger at sentencing. Prosecutors, meanwhile, have requested the transcript of Kohberger’s July 2025 plea hearing, apparently preparing to use Kohberger’s own sworn statements in court to undermine his new assertion that the plea was involuntary. What had appeared to be a closed case after Kohberger admitted responsibility and received four consecutive life sentences has therefore reopened into a significant post-conviction battle, with his new attorneys signaling that the circumstances surrounding the plea, his former defense team and potentially previously undisclosed information could become central issues in court.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


Bryan Kohberger's new lawyer targets guilty plea constitutionality | Fox News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>689bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/media-lawyers-challenge-tyler-robinson-s-bid-to-restrict-courtroom-access-9-1-26--74772207
The media attorneys are also opposing Robinson’s attempt to keep portions of his camera-ban motion private. They argue that court filings are presumptively public and that Robinson cannot take information already circulating publicly, place it in a court filing and then transform it into confidential material. Their blunt formulation was that “what is public is public,” and they characterized the defense’s predictions about the consequences of continued public access as generalized and unsupported. At the same time, Graf has imposed separate courtroom controls for the September 1 proceeding, banning cellphones and other electronic devices for most attendees while allowing attorneys and certain legal staff to use them. The dispute therefore sets up a clear confrontation between Robinson’s argument that continued broadcasting risks prejudicing his eventual trial and the media’s position that transparency, especially after so much of the proceeding has already been public, is itself an important safeguard.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


'What is public is public': Media attorneys argue in Tyler Robinson hearing | KSL.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74772207Tue, 01 Sep 2026 12:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciAttorneys representing media organizations are pushing back against Tyler Robinson’s renewed effort to keep cameras out of the courtroom for the final day of his preliminary hearing on September 1. They argue that Judge Tony Graf has already rejected...
The media attorneys are also opposing Robinson’s attempt to keep portions of his camera-ban motion private. They argue that court filings are presumptively public and that Robinson cannot take information already circulating publicly, place it in a court filing and then transform it into confidential material. Their blunt formulation was that “what is public is public,” and they characterized the defense’s predictions about the consequences of continued public access as generalized and unsupported. At the same time, Graf has imposed separate courtroom controls for the September 1 proceeding, banning cellphones and other electronic devices for most attendees while allowing attorneys and certain legal staff to use them. The dispute therefore sets up a clear confrontation between Robinson’s argument that continued broadcasting risks prejudicing his eventual trial and the media’s position that transparency, especially after so much of the proceeding has already been public, is itself an important safeguard.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


'What is public is public': Media attorneys argue in Tyler Robinson hearing | KSL.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>725breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-authorities-in-moscow-and-the-wide-net-cast-in-search-of-evidence-9-1-26--74770789Investigators in Moscow cast an unusually wide net for surveillance footage as they tried to reconstruct the movements surrounding the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. Police canvassed neighborhoods, businesses and roadways well beyond the immediate King Road area, collecting video from homes, commercial properties and traffic routes miles away from the crime scene. That broader search was critical to the vehicle investigation, because detectives were not just looking for what happened directly outside the house; they were trying to trace a white Hyundai Elantra as it moved through Moscow and surrounding areas before and after the killings. The surveillance effort eventually became part of a much larger timeline that investigators used to compare vehicle movements with cellphone data, witness accounts and other evidence, turning scattered camera footage from across the area into a reconstruction of where the suspected vehicle traveled that night.

At the same time, authorities processed the King Road residence as an enormous forensic scene and collected a vast amount of physical evidence. Investigators took thousands of photographs, created 3D scans of the house, collected more than a hundred pieces of physical evidence early in the investigation and submitted biological material for laboratory testing. That evidence included blood, DNA, fingerprints, trace material and items taken from multiple rooms, along with the knife sheath later tied to Kohberger through DNA testing. Search warrants also produced additional evidence from Kohberger’s Washington apartment, office, vehicle and Pennsylvania family home. The scale of the collection showed how investigators were building the case from multiple directions at once: surveillance footage established movement, digital evidence helped establish timing, and DNA and physical evidence were used to connect people and objects to the crime scene.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74770789Tue, 01 Sep 2026 10:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciInvestigators in Moscow cast an unusually wide net for surveillance footage as they tried to reconstruct the movements surrounding the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. Police canvassed neighborhoods,...Investigators in Moscow cast an unusually wide net for surveillance footage as they tried to reconstruct the movements surrounding the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. Police canvassed neighborhoods, businesses and roadways well beyond the immediate King Road area, collecting video from homes, commercial properties and traffic routes miles away from the crime scene. That broader search was critical to the vehicle investigation, because detectives were not just looking for what happened directly outside the house; they were trying to trace a white Hyundai Elantra as it moved through Moscow and surrounding areas before and after the killings. The surveillance effort eventually became part of a much larger timeline that investigators used to compare vehicle movements with cellphone data, witness accounts and other evidence, turning scattered camera footage from across the area into a reconstruction of where the suspected vehicle traveled that night.

At the same time, authorities processed the King Road residence as an enormous forensic scene and collected a vast amount of physical evidence. Investigators took thousands of photographs, created 3D scans of the house, collected more than a hundred pieces of physical evidence early in the investigation and submitted biological material for laboratory testing. That evidence included blood, DNA, fingerprints, trace material and items taken from multiple rooms, along with the knife sheath later tied to Kohberger through DNA testing. Search warrants also produced additional evidence from Kohberger’s Washington apartment, office, vehicle and Pennsylvania family home. The scale of the collection showed how investigators were building the case from multiple directions at once: surveillance footage established movement, digital evidence helped establish timing, and DNA and physical evidence were used to connect people and objects to the crime scene.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2953bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-media-battles-for-their-right-to-intervene-in-the-kohberger-case-9-1-26--74770788
Judge John Judge ultimately granted the media coalition permission to intervene, but only for the limited purpose of litigating the nondissemination order rather than becoming a full-fledged party to Kohberger’s criminal prosecution. That distinction mattered: the news organizations were not being allowed to litigate guilt, evidence or other substantive issues between the State and Kohberger, but they were given standing to argue that court restrictions affecting public access and press freedom were unconstitutional or unnecessarily broad. The intervention became part of a much larger struggle over transparency in the case, eventually extending into disputes over cameras, courtroom photography and access to court records. In practical terms, the media organizations recognized that their interests were not always going to be represented by either prosecutors or the defense, so competitors that normally fought each other for stories joined forces to defend a common principle: if a court order restricted the public’s ability to learn about the prosecution, the press wanted a seat at the table when that restriction was challenged.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74770788Tue, 01 Sep 2026 08:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciA coalition of roughly 20 news organizations banded together in the spring of 2023 and asked to formally intervene in the Bryan Kohberger case so they could challenge the sweeping nondissemination order restricting what attorneys, law enforcement...
Judge John Judge ultimately granted the media coalition permission to intervene, but only for the limited purpose of litigating the nondissemination order rather than becoming a full-fledged party to Kohberger’s criminal prosecution. That distinction mattered: the news organizations were not being allowed to litigate guilt, evidence or other substantive issues between the State and Kohberger, but they were given standing to argue that court restrictions affecting public access and press freedom were unconstitutional or unnecessarily broad. The intervention became part of a much larger struggle over transparency in the case, eventually extending into disputes over cameras, courtroom photography and access to court records. In practical terms, the media organizations recognized that their interests were not always going to be represented by either prosecutors or the defense, so competitors that normally fought each other for stories joined forces to defend a common principle: if a court order restricted the public’s ability to learn about the prosecution, the press wanted a seat at the table when that restriction was challenged.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2704bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-todd-blanche-and-his-stewardship-of-the-epstein-fiasco-8-31-26--74773148Pam Bondi effectively placed responsibility for the Justice Department’s troubled handling of the Epstein files on Todd Blanche when she testified before House investigators in May 2026. Bondi said she did not personally conduct the document review and repeatedly emphasized that Blanche had been “in charge of the process and the entire release of the Epstein files.” She acknowledged that redaction errors occurred, including failures involving sensitive survivor information, while distancing herself from the mechanics of how the review and release were carried out. Democratic lawmakers came away from the questioning saying Bondi was clearly pointing to Blanche as the official responsible for the mistakes, although Bondi later pushed back publicly and insisted she was not trying to blame him. Even so, the transcript showed her drawing a clear line between her own role and Blanche’s, praising him personally while simultaneously identifying him as the person who managed the process that produced the botched redactions, incomplete disclosures and broader controversy surrounding the release.

Epstein survivors have been even more direct in blaming Blanche. After meeting with him in July 2026, more than two dozen accusers urged senators not to confirm him as attorney general, describing the meeting as an exercise in deflection and saying he showed no remorse for a release process that exposed survivors’ names, identifying information and deeply personal material while other names remained redacted. Annie Farmer called Blanche abrasive, condescending and intentionally noncommittal, while other survivors said the meeting felt like a box-checking exercise arranged only because his confirmation was in jeopardy. They also criticized his handling of Ghislaine Maxwell, his apparent reluctance to pursue additional investigative leads and what they saw as a broader failure to center survivors in decisions about the Epstein records. Taken together, Bondi’s testimony and the survivors’ statements put Blanche at the center of the Epstein-files fiasco from two very different directions: his former boss identified him as the official overseeing the release, while the people most directly harmed by Epstein accused him of mishandling that responsibility and then failing to meaningfully answer for it.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com







Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74773148Tue, 01 Sep 2026 06:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciPam Bondi effectively placed responsibility for the Justice Department’s troubled handling of the Epstein files on Todd Blanche when she testified before House investigators in May 2026. Bondi said she did not personally conduct the document review...Pam Bondi effectively placed responsibility for the Justice Department’s troubled handling of the Epstein files on Todd Blanche when she testified before House investigators in May 2026. Bondi said she did not personally conduct the document review and repeatedly emphasized that Blanche had been “in charge of the process and the entire release of the Epstein files.” She acknowledged that redaction errors occurred, including failures involving sensitive survivor information, while distancing herself from the mechanics of how the review and release were carried out. Democratic lawmakers came away from the questioning saying Bondi was clearly pointing to Blanche as the official responsible for the mistakes, although Bondi later pushed back publicly and insisted she was not trying to blame him. Even so, the transcript showed her drawing a clear line between her own role and Blanche’s, praising him personally while simultaneously identifying him as the person who managed the process that produced the botched redactions, incomplete disclosures and broader controversy surrounding the release.

Epstein survivors have been even more direct in blaming Blanche. After meeting with him in July 2026, more than two dozen accusers urged senators not to confirm him as attorney general, describing the meeting as an exercise in deflection and saying he showed no remorse for a release process that exposed survivors’ names, identifying information and deeply personal material while other names remained redacted. Annie Farmer called Blanche abrasive, condescending and intentionally noncommittal, while other survivors said the meeting felt like a box-checking exercise arranged only because his confirmation was in jeopardy. They also criticized his handling of Ghislaine Maxwell, his apparent reluctance to pursue additional investigative leads and what they saw as a broader failure to center survivors in decisions about the Epstein records. Taken together, Bondi’s testimony and the survivors’ statements put Blanche at the center of the Epstein-files fiasco from two very different directions: his former boss identified him as the official overseeing the release, while the people most directly harmed by Epstein accused him of mishandling that responsibility and then failing to meaningfully answer for it.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com







Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2539epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-the-moscow-police-and-the-briefing-from-december-14th-2022--74770533One month after the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, Moscow police said investigators were still reconstructing the victims’ movements and trying to determine who was responsible. The department urged the public to rely on official information rather than rumors, warning that speculation had generated misleading tips and even harassment and threats against people connected to the case. Police said the investigation still involved substantial resources, including six Moscow detectives, five support staff, 46 FBI investigators, two FBI Behavioral Analysis Unit investigators, 13 Idaho State Police investigators and 15 state troopers. Investigators remained particularly interested in locating the occupant or occupants of a white 2011-2013 Hyundai Elantra seen near the King Road residence during the early morning hours of November 13, saying whoever was inside the vehicle could have critical information. At that point, police had not identified a suspect, had not recovered the murder weapon and were still asking for surveillance footage, tips and information about the victims’ activities before they returned home.

The December 13 update also consolidated much of what investigators had publicly established while addressing a growing list of rumors. Police said Goncalves and Mogen had returned home around 1:56 a.m., while Chapin and Kernodle were believed to have returned around 1:45 a.m.; the surviving roommates had been home by about 1 a.m. Officers reiterated that they did not believe the surviving roommates, the man seen at the food truck, the private driver, the man repeatedly called by Goncalves and Mogen, people present when 911 was called, or a former tenant were involved. Investigators said they had pursued hundreds of reports about a possible stalker but had not verified one, and they rejected suggested connections to unrelated stabbings, a skinned dog, a red Mustang and several other incidents circulating online. By then, detectives had received thousands of calls, emails and digital submissions, collected 113 pieces of physical evidence, taken roughly 4,000 crime-scene photographs and created multiple 3D scans of the residence. Police maintained that the murders were a targeted attack, but said they still had not determined whether the intended target was the house itself or one or more of its occupants.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com












Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74770533Tue, 01 Sep 2026 04:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciOne month after the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, Moscow police said investigators were still reconstructing the victims’ movements and trying to determine who was responsible. The department urged the...One month after the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, Moscow police said investigators were still reconstructing the victims’ movements and trying to determine who was responsible. The department urged the public to rely on official information rather than rumors, warning that speculation had generated misleading tips and even harassment and threats against people connected to the case. Police said the investigation still involved substantial resources, including six Moscow detectives, five support staff, 46 FBI investigators, two FBI Behavioral Analysis Unit investigators, 13 Idaho State Police investigators and 15 state troopers. Investigators remained particularly interested in locating the occupant or occupants of a white 2011-2013 Hyundai Elantra seen near the King Road residence during the early morning hours of November 13, saying whoever was inside the vehicle could have critical information. At that point, police had not identified a suspect, had not recovered the murder weapon and were still asking for surveillance footage, tips and information about the victims’ activities before they returned home.

The December 13 update also consolidated much of what investigators had publicly established while addressing a growing list of rumors. Police said Goncalves and Mogen had returned home around 1:56 a.m., while Chapin and Kernodle were believed to have returned around 1:45 a.m.; the surviving roommates had been home by about 1 a.m. Officers reiterated that they did not believe the surviving roommates, the man seen at the food truck, the private driver, the man repeatedly called by Goncalves and Mogen, people present when 911 was called, or a former tenant were involved. Investigators said they had pursued hundreds of reports about a possible stalker but had not verified one, and they rejected suggested connections to unrelated stabbings, a skinned dog, a red Mustang and several other incidents circulating online. By then, detectives had received thousands of calls, emails and digital submissions, collected 113 pieces of physical evidence, taken roughly 4,000 crime-scene photographs and created multiple 3D scans of the residence. Police maintained that the murders were a targeted attack, but said they still had not determined whether the intended target was the house itself or one or more of its occupants.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com












Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>962bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-two-former-fbi-agents-discuss-the-murders-in-moscow--74770535
Coulson agreed that the case could ultimately be solved through either a strong public tip or forensic evidence recovered from the King Road crime scene, and he emphasized the importance of the FBI’s evidence-response team in sorting through what he described as an extremely difficult scene. He noted that the killer may have injured himself during the attack, which could have left behind blood or DNA capable of identifying him. Unlike investigators at the time, however, Coulson said he did not see the murders as obviously targeted, while also acknowledging that police might have been deliberately withholding important details to protect the investigation. At that stage, no suspect had been publicly identified, the murder weapon had not been found, and authorities were still trying to determine what the physical evidence, interviews and growing number of tips were actually telling them about who killed the four students.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74770535Tue, 01 Sep 2026 02:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciTen days after the murders of Ethan Chapin, Xana Kernodle, Kaylee Goncalves and Madison Mogen, former FBI officials Chris Swecker and Danny Coulson said Moscow police appeared to need more help from the public to break the case open. Swecker said...
Coulson agreed that the case could ultimately be solved through either a strong public tip or forensic evidence recovered from the King Road crime scene, and he emphasized the importance of the FBI’s evidence-response team in sorting through what he described as an extremely difficult scene. He noted that the killer may have injured himself during the attack, which could have left behind blood or DNA capable of identifying him. Unlike investigators at the time, however, Coulson said he did not see the murders as obviously targeted, while also acknowledging that police might have been deliberately withholding important details to protect the investigation. At that stage, no suspect had been publicly identified, the murder weapon had not been found, and authorities were still trying to determine what the physical evidence, interviews and growing number of tips were actually telling them about who killed the four students.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>644bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-did-the-fbi-lose-track-of-bryan-kohberger--74770534The FBI pushed back against reports that agents had briefly lost track of Bryan Kohberger while surveilling him during his cross-country drive from Washington to Pennsylvania in December 2022. According to the bureau, the claim was inaccurate and there had been no lapse in surveillance before Kohberger was arrested at his parents’ home on December 30. The denial came amid continuing scrutiny of how investigators tracked Kohberger after identifying him as a person of interest in the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. At the same time, more details were emerging about Kohberger’s behavior before the murders, including accounts from University of Idaho students who said they had seen him on the Moscow campus and remembered him staring at people in ways they found unsettling.

The report also highlighted how the investigation was expanding beyond the evidence already disclosed in the probable-cause affidavit. Students and acquaintances described Kohberger as socially awkward and, in some cases, intense in his interactions, while investigators continued reviewing his movements, digital activity and possible connections to the victims or their surroundings. None of those campus sightings established that Kohberger had anything to do with the murders, but they added another layer to the growing effort to reconstruct where he had been, whom he had encountered and how familiar he may have been with Moscow before November 13, 2022. The FBI’s denial about losing him during surveillance was significant because it directly challenged one of the more dramatic claims circulating about the manhunt and reinforced the broader message from authorities that many details being reported publicly were either incomplete or incorrect.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74770534Tue, 01 Sep 2026 00:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe FBI pushed back against reports that agents had briefly lost track of Bryan Kohberger while surveilling him during his cross-country drive from Washington to Pennsylvania in December 2022. According to the bureau, the claim was inaccurate and...The FBI pushed back against reports that agents had briefly lost track of Bryan Kohberger while surveilling him during his cross-country drive from Washington to Pennsylvania in December 2022. According to the bureau, the claim was inaccurate and there had been no lapse in surveillance before Kohberger was arrested at his parents’ home on December 30. The denial came amid continuing scrutiny of how investigators tracked Kohberger after identifying him as a person of interest in the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. At the same time, more details were emerging about Kohberger’s behavior before the murders, including accounts from University of Idaho students who said they had seen him on the Moscow campus and remembered him staring at people in ways they found unsettling.

The report also highlighted how the investigation was expanding beyond the evidence already disclosed in the probable-cause affidavit. Students and acquaintances described Kohberger as socially awkward and, in some cases, intense in his interactions, while investigators continued reviewing his movements, digital activity and possible connections to the victims or their surroundings. None of those campus sightings established that Kohberger had anything to do with the murders, but they added another layer to the growing effort to reconstruct where he had been, whom he had encountered and how familiar he may have been with Moscow before November 13, 2022. The FBI’s denial about losing him during surveillance was significant because it directly challenged one of the more dramatic claims circulating about the manhunt and reinforced the broader message from authorities that many details being reported publicly were either incomplete or incorrect.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>639bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/jes-staley-and-the-transcripts-from-his-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-3-8-31-26--74760578
The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein’s cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley’s professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.


to contact me:


bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74760578Mon, 31 Aug 2026 22:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe transcripts from Jes Staley’s July 24, 2026 interview with the House Oversight Committee revealed just how deep and personal his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein became, while also exposing contradictions in the way Staley had described that...
The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein’s cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley’s professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.


to contact me:


bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1099epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/jes-staley-and-the-transcripts-from-his-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-2-8-31-26--74760576
The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein’s cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley’s professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.


to contact me:


bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74760576Mon, 31 Aug 2026 20:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe transcripts from Jes Staley’s July 24, 2026 interview with the House Oversight Committee revealed just how deep and personal his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein became, while also exposing contradictions in the way Staley had described that...
The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein’s cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley’s professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.


to contact me:


bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>751epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/jes-staley-and-the-transcripts-from-his-epstein-related-trip-to-congress-part-1-8-30-26--74760577
The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein’s cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley’s professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.


to contact me:


bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74760577Mon, 31 Aug 2026 18:55:53 +0000Bobby CapucciThe transcripts from Jes Staley’s July 24, 2026 interview with the House Oversight Committee revealed just how deep and personal his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein became, while also exposing contradictions in the way Staley had described that...
The committee also pressed Staley on some of the strangest and most troubling material in his correspondence with Epstein, including the notorious “Snow White” emails and other references to Disney characters. Staley denied having sex with a woman dressed as Snow White and said he could not explain the meaning of some of the messages, even when investigators confronted him with contemporaneous emails and photographs. He maintained that he did not know Epstein was continuing to abuse girls after his 2008 conviction, calling that revelation “incredible,” yet the transcripts also showed that Staley personally argued for JPMorgan to keep Epstein as a client even as internal concerns about Epstein’s cash withdrawals and potential trafficking activity were mounting. Staley also said he had spoken with Jamie Dimon about Epstein, something Dimon and JPMorgan have disputed. Taken together, the testimony painted a picture of a relationship that was far closer, more intertwined with Staley’s professional life and more difficult to reconcile with his earlier descriptions than he had previously acknowledged.


to contact me:


bobbycapuci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>877epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/bryan-kohberger-seeks-judge-steven-hippler-s-removal-in-guilty-plea-challenge-8-31-26--74760575
At the same time, Kohberger’s defense is asking for the post-conviction proceedings to be transferred back to Latah County, where the murders occurred. The original criminal case was moved to Ada County because of concerns about seating an impartial jury and handling the enormous logistical demands of a capital trial, but Rauch argues those reasons no longer apply because the current proceeding will be decided by a judge rather than a jury. The defense says moving the case back to Latah County would better serve the convenience of witnesses and the interests of justice. Together, the two motions show that Kohberger’s challenge is expanding beyond the validity of the plea itself and into the structure of the proceeding that will decide it. If he ultimately succeeds in withdrawing his guilty plea, the case could return to trial posture and potentially reopen the death-penalty exposure that disappeared when he accepted the 2025 plea agreement.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

source:

Bryan Kohberger seeks judge’s removal in escalating bid to undo guilty plea




Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74760575Mon, 31 Aug 2026 16:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBryan Kohberger is escalating his effort to undo his guilty plea by asking for Judge Steven Hippler to be removed from his post-conviction case and for the proceedings to be moved out of Ada County. Kohberger’s new court-appointed attorney, Gregory...
At the same time, Kohberger’s defense is asking for the post-conviction proceedings to be transferred back to Latah County, where the murders occurred. The original criminal case was moved to Ada County because of concerns about seating an impartial jury and handling the enormous logistical demands of a capital trial, but Rauch argues those reasons no longer apply because the current proceeding will be decided by a judge rather than a jury. The defense says moving the case back to Latah County would better serve the convenience of witnesses and the interests of justice. Together, the two motions show that Kohberger’s challenge is expanding beyond the validity of the plea itself and into the structure of the proceeding that will decide it. If he ultimately succeeds in withdrawing his guilty plea, the case could return to trial posture and potentially reopen the death-penalty exposure that disappeared when he accepted the 2025 plea agreement.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

source:

Bryan Kohberger seeks judge’s removal in escalating bid to undo guilty plea




Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>766bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-files-post-preliminary-hearing-status-report-on-discovery-part-2-8-31-26--74760561
The digital evidence is even larger. Robinson’s lawyers say they received approximately 12.1 terabytes containing more than 613,000 files, including extractions from six mobile devices, forensic images of computer drives and records obtained from Apple, Google, Discord, AT&T, Verizon and other providers. Those materials contain millions of individual digital artifacts, more than one million Discord communications, at least 25,253 cell-site location records and an additional 170-gigabyte Apple production received in August that had not yet been processed. The defense also received roughly 660 gigabytes of raw FARO 3D crime-scene scanning data that requires specialized software and expert assistance before it can be meaningfully evaluated. Beyond volume, Robinson’s lawyers say important forensic discovery disputes remain unresolved because the FBI and ATF have not provided all of the underlying DNA and other forensic material the defense requested. The defense is therefore preparing a motion to compel that material, supported by expert declarations, and plans to ask Judge Graf at the September 1 hearing to establish a briefing schedule. The larger point of the filing is unmistakable: Robinson’s team is telling the court that the preliminary hearing may be over, but the defense believes it is still nowhere near the end of reviewing, processing and litigating the evidence that would be necessary to prepare the case for trial.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Robinson document 123456789------------- | PDF

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74760561Mon, 31 Aug 2026 14:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciTyler Robinson’s defense filed a post-preliminary hearing status report to give Judge Tony Graf a fuller picture of just how enormous and technically complicated discovery has become in the case. The defense says prosecutors have produced 29,237 files...
The digital evidence is even larger. Robinson’s lawyers say they received approximately 12.1 terabytes containing more than 613,000 files, including extractions from six mobile devices, forensic images of computer drives and records obtained from Apple, Google, Discord, AT&T, Verizon and other providers. Those materials contain millions of individual digital artifacts, more than one million Discord communications, at least 25,253 cell-site location records and an additional 170-gigabyte Apple production received in August that had not yet been processed. The defense also received roughly 660 gigabytes of raw FARO 3D crime-scene scanning data that requires specialized software and expert assistance before it can be meaningfully evaluated. Beyond volume, Robinson’s lawyers say important forensic discovery disputes remain unresolved because the FBI and ATF have not provided all of the underlying DNA and other forensic material the defense requested. The defense is therefore preparing a motion to compel that material, supported by expert declarations, and plans to ask Judge Graf at the September 1 hearing to establish a briefing schedule. The larger point of the filing is unmistakable: Robinson’s team is telling the court that the preliminary hearing may be over, but the defense believes it is still nowhere near the end of reviewing, processing and litigating the evidence that would be necessary to prepare the case for trial.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Robinson document 123456789------------- | PDF

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>567breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-files-post-preliminary-hearing-status-report-on-discovery-part-1-8-31-26--74760562
The digital evidence is even larger. Robinson’s lawyers say they received approximately 12.1 terabytes containing more than 613,000 files, including extractions from six mobile devices, forensic images of computer drives and records obtained from Apple, Google, Discord, AT&T, Verizon and other providers. Those materials contain millions of individual digital artifacts, more than one million Discord communications, at least 25,253 cell-site location records and an additional 170-gigabyte Apple production received in August that had not yet been processed. The defense also received roughly 660 gigabytes of raw FARO 3D crime-scene scanning data that requires specialized software and expert assistance before it can be meaningfully evaluated. Beyond volume, Robinson’s lawyers say important forensic discovery disputes remain unresolved because the FBI and ATF have not provided all of the underlying DNA and other forensic material the defense requested. The defense is therefore preparing a motion to compel that material, supported by expert declarations, and plans to ask Judge Graf at the September 1 hearing to establish a briefing schedule. The larger point of the filing is unmistakable: Robinson’s team is telling the court that the preliminary hearing may be over, but the defense believes it is still nowhere near the end of reviewing, processing and litigating the evidence that would be necessary to prepare the case for trial.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Robinson document 123456789------------- | PDF

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74760562Mon, 31 Aug 2026 12:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciTyler Robinson’s defense filed a post-preliminary hearing status report to give Judge Tony Graf a fuller picture of just how enormous and technically complicated discovery has become in the case. The defense says prosecutors have produced 29,237 files...
The digital evidence is even larger. Robinson’s lawyers say they received approximately 12.1 terabytes containing more than 613,000 files, including extractions from six mobile devices, forensic images of computer drives and records obtained from Apple, Google, Discord, AT&T, Verizon and other providers. Those materials contain millions of individual digital artifacts, more than one million Discord communications, at least 25,253 cell-site location records and an additional 170-gigabyte Apple production received in August that had not yet been processed. The defense also received roughly 660 gigabytes of raw FARO 3D crime-scene scanning data that requires specialized software and expert assistance before it can be meaningfully evaluated. Beyond volume, Robinson’s lawyers say important forensic discovery disputes remain unresolved because the FBI and ATF have not provided all of the underlying DNA and other forensic material the defense requested. The defense is therefore preparing a motion to compel that material, supported by expert declarations, and plans to ask Judge Graf at the September 1 hearing to establish a briefing schedule. The larger point of the filing is unmistakable: Robinson’s team is telling the court that the preliminary hearing may be over, but the defense believes it is still nowhere near the end of reviewing, processing and litigating the evidence that would be necessary to prepare the case for trial.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Robinson document 123456789------------- | PDF

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>636breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-lawyer-for-the-goncalves-family-and-his-back-and-forth-with-moscow-pd-8-31-26--74748189
Gray also criticized specific investigative choices, including the timing of public appeals and what he viewed as missed opportunities to seek information while it was still fresh. He questioned why police had not issued an early request for information about anyone who may have had injuries to their hands or forearms after the killings, noting that those kinds of wounds could have healed by the time investigators publicly sought broader assistance. At the same time, Gray did not claim the investigation was hopeless or that police were acting in bad faith; his position was that the families deserved better communication, more transparency and confidence that every obvious avenue was being pursued aggressively. His comments captured the tension surrounding the case before Bryan Kohberger’s arrest, when law enforcement insisted it was making progress behind the scenes while the Goncalves family increasingly questioned whether the investigation was moving quickly and efficiently


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74748189Mon, 31 Aug 2026 10:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciShanon Gray, the attorney hired by Kaylee Goncalves’ family, gave a sharply critical assessment of how authorities were handling the investigation into the murders of Kaylee, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. Gray said the family’s...
Gray also criticized specific investigative choices, including the timing of public appeals and what he viewed as missed opportunities to seek information while it was still fresh. He questioned why police had not issued an early request for information about anyone who may have had injuries to their hands or forearms after the killings, noting that those kinds of wounds could have healed by the time investigators publicly sought broader assistance. At the same time, Gray did not claim the investigation was hopeless or that police were acting in bad faith; his position was that the families deserved better communication, more transparency and confidence that every obvious avenue was being pursued aggressively. His comments captured the tension surrounding the case before Bryan Kohberger’s arrest, when law enforcement insisted it was making progress behind the scenes while the Goncalves family increasingly questioned whether the investigation was moving quickly and efficiently


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2953bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-men-who-were-in-charge-of-the-investigation-in-moscow-and-their-narrative-8-31-26--74748185
Snell largely reinforced that message from the state-police side, emphasizing that ISP and the FBI were supporting Moscow rather than taking over the investigation. He repeatedly urged the public to distinguish confirmed information from speculation and explained that investigators were examining enormous amounts of tips, video, digital evidence and physical evidence while refusing to publicly validate theories simply because they were gaining traction online. Both men pushed back against the idea that a lack of public information meant police lacked information internally. Their consistent position was that rumors about suspects, motives, victim behavior and investigative techniques could damage innocent people and interfere with the case, while verified information would be released only when investigators believed doing so would not jeopardize the investigation or prosecution.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74748185Mon, 31 Aug 2026 08:45:02 +0000Bobby CapucciChief James Fry and Idaho State Police spokesman Aaron Snell became two of the main law-enforcement voices explaining what investigators knew, and just as importantly, what they were not prepared to say publicly, after the murders of Kaylee Goncalves,...
Snell largely reinforced that message from the state-police side, emphasizing that ISP and the FBI were supporting Moscow rather than taking over the investigation. He repeatedly urged the public to distinguish confirmed information from speculation and explained that investigators were examining enormous amounts of tips, video, digital evidence and physical evidence while refusing to publicly validate theories simply because they were gaining traction online. Both men pushed back against the idea that a lack of public information meant police lacked information internally. Their consistent position was that rumors about suspects, motives, victim behavior and investigative techniques could damage innocent people and interfere with the case, while verified information would be released only when investigators believed doing so would not jeopardize the investigation or prosecution.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2829bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-tova-noel-and-her-transcript-from-her-congressional-testimony-part-11-13-8-30-26--74759099
Noel denied having any role in Epstein’s death, receiving money in connection with him or knowing anything about an alleged payment to facilitate access to his cell. She also rejected claims that she was the unidentified orange-colored figure seen moving toward Epstein’s tier at approximately 10:39 p.m., insisting that she never returned to the area and could not explain what—or who—the surveillance image showed. Although Noel said she believed Epstein died by suicide because he was supposedly alone inside the cell, her testimony did little to resolve the most important unanswered questions: why required checks were abandoned, why Epstein remained without a cellmate, who or what appeared near the tier, and how so many security procedures failed simultaneously. Instead, her account reinforced the picture of extraordinary negligence, special treatment and institutional dysfunction surrounding the death of the most consequential prisoner in federal custody.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74759099Mon, 31 Aug 2026 06:30:04 +0000Bobby CapucciTova Noel, one of the two correctional officers assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center’s Special Housing Unit on the night Jeffrey Epstein died, told the House Oversight Committee that she failed to conduct the required inmate checks and...
Noel denied having any role in Epstein’s death, receiving money in connection with him or knowing anything about an alleged payment to facilitate access to his cell. She also rejected claims that she was the unidentified orange-colored figure seen moving toward Epstein’s tier at approximately 10:39 p.m., insisting that she never returned to the area and could not explain what—or who—the surveillance image showed. Although Noel said she believed Epstein died by suicide because he was supposedly alone inside the cell, her testimony did little to resolve the most important unanswered questions: why required checks were abandoned, why Epstein remained without a cellmate, who or what appeared near the tier, and how so many security procedures failed simultaneously. Instead, her account reinforced the picture of extraordinary negligence, special treatment and institutional dysfunction surrounding the death of the most consequential prisoner in federal custody.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2688epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-gabby-petito-s-father-shares-a-message-with-the-families-in-moscow--74757055Gabby Petito’s father, Joe Petito, offered a deeply personal message to the families of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin as they navigated the aftermath of the University of Idaho murders. Speaking with NewsNation’s Brian Entin, Petito said one of the most important things grieving families could do was surround themselves with a strong support system and avoid trying to carry the pain alone. He pointed to the way he, his wife Tara, Gabby’s mother Nichole Schmidt and her husband Jim Schmidt leaned on one another after Gabby’s murder, saying that having people around who could hold each other up made an enormous difference when trying to survive an unimaginable loss. His advice to the Idaho families was not that the pain would disappear, but that having trusted people beside them could help them navigate something no family should ever have to endure.

Petito also spoke about the way his family tried to turn Gabby’s death into advocacy, particularly around domestic violence and law-enforcement reform. At the time, he was supporting Utah legislation that would require officers responding to domestic violence calls to conduct a lethality assessment designed to identify warning signs that a victim might be in immediate danger. Petito said he believed a system like that could potentially have changed what happened to Gabby after police encountered her and Brian Laundrie during their trip through Utah. His message to the Idaho families therefore came from someone who understood both the public scrutiny surrounding a nationally followed homicide and the long, painful process of trying to build something meaningful out of tragedy.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74757055Mon, 31 Aug 2026 04:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciGabby Petito’s father, Joe Petito, offered a deeply personal message to the families of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin as they navigated the aftermath of the University of Idaho murders. Speaking with NewsNation’s...Gabby Petito’s father, Joe Petito, offered a deeply personal message to the families of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin as they navigated the aftermath of the University of Idaho murders. Speaking with NewsNation’s Brian Entin, Petito said one of the most important things grieving families could do was surround themselves with a strong support system and avoid trying to carry the pain alone. He pointed to the way he, his wife Tara, Gabby’s mother Nichole Schmidt and her husband Jim Schmidt leaned on one another after Gabby’s murder, saying that having people around who could hold each other up made an enormous difference when trying to survive an unimaginable loss. His advice to the Idaho families was not that the pain would disappear, but that having trusted people beside them could help them navigate something no family should ever have to endure.

Petito also spoke about the way his family tried to turn Gabby’s death into advocacy, particularly around domestic violence and law-enforcement reform. At the time, he was supporting Utah legislation that would require officers responding to domestic violence calls to conduct a lethality assessment designed to identify warning signs that a victim might be in immediate danger. Petito said he believed a system like that could potentially have changed what happened to Gabby after police encountered her and Brian Laundrie during their trip through Utah. His message to the Idaho families therefore came from someone who understood both the public scrutiny surrounding a nationally followed homicide and the long, painful process of trying to build something meaningful out of tragedy.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>634bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-xana-kernodle-s-family-seeks-answers-in-the-wake-of-the-murders--74757054Nearly six weeks after the murders of Xana Kernodle, Ethan Chapin, Madison Mogen and Kaylee Goncalves, Kernodle’s family took matters into its own hands by mailing 5,000 flyers to homes in and around Moscow, Idaho, asking residents to come forward with any information, photographs or video that might help investigators. It was the family’s second flyer campaign; the first had begun just one week after the killings, when posters were distributed door to door and placed around the community. The new mailers included photographs of all four victims along with information about how to submit tips and digital evidence to law enforcement. At that point, dozens of FBI agents and analysts were assisting Moscow police and Idaho State Police, but no suspect had been publicly identified.

Investigators said the family’s effort was valuable because they were still trying to piece together the victims’ final hours and determine whether seemingly insignificant photos, videos or social-media posts might contain useful context. By then, police had received nearly 15,000 tips and were reviewing thousands of pieces of video and other evidence, while also working through registrations for roughly 22,000 white Hyundai Elantras from model years 2011 to 2013. Despite growing public concern that the case was going cold, Chief James Fry and other officials rejected that characterization and insisted detectives were still actively developing leads. The flyer campaign captured the desperation of the moment: the families were grieving, the community was on edge, and investigators were still searching for the break that would finally identify the person responsible.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

https://lawandcrime.com/crime/family-of-slain-university-of-idaho-student-mails-out-flyers-pleading-for-tips-in-quadruple-homicide/









Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74757054Mon, 31 Aug 2026 02:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciNearly six weeks after the murders of Xana Kernodle, Ethan Chapin, Madison Mogen and Kaylee Goncalves, Kernodle’s family took matters into its own hands by mailing 5,000 flyers to homes in and around Moscow, Idaho, asking residents to come forward...Nearly six weeks after the murders of Xana Kernodle, Ethan Chapin, Madison Mogen and Kaylee Goncalves, Kernodle’s family took matters into its own hands by mailing 5,000 flyers to homes in and around Moscow, Idaho, asking residents to come forward with any information, photographs or video that might help investigators. It was the family’s second flyer campaign; the first had begun just one week after the killings, when posters were distributed door to door and placed around the community. The new mailers included photographs of all four victims along with information about how to submit tips and digital evidence to law enforcement. At that point, dozens of FBI agents and analysts were assisting Moscow police and Idaho State Police, but no suspect had been publicly identified.

Investigators said the family’s effort was valuable because they were still trying to piece together the victims’ final hours and determine whether seemingly insignificant photos, videos or social-media posts might contain useful context. By then, police had received nearly 15,000 tips and were reviewing thousands of pieces of video and other evidence, while also working through registrations for roughly 22,000 white Hyundai Elantras from model years 2011 to 2013. Despite growing public concern that the case was going cold, Chief James Fry and other officials rejected that characterization and insisted detectives were still actively developing leads. The flyer campaign captured the desperation of the moment: the families were grieving, the community was on edge, and investigators were still searching for the break that would finally identify the person responsible.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

https://lawandcrime.com/crime/family-of-slain-university-of-idaho-student-mails-out-flyers-pleading-for-tips-in-quadruple-homicide/









Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>751bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-the-order-releasing-property-to-family-members-of-the-victims--74757053
Marshall ultimately chose partial secrecy rather than sealing everything connected to the matter. Exhibits A and B attached to the Stipulation to Release Property were ordered completely sealed, while the stipulation itself and the corresponding Order to Release Property were permitted to become public only after certain information was redacted. The restrictions were ordered to remain in place until the court directed otherwise. The ruling was representative of the intense secrecy that surrounded the Kohberger investigation during its early stages, when the court repeatedly had to balance extraordinary public interest in the case against concerns that releasing investigative details, private information or sensitive evidence too early could compromise individuals involved or prejudice the eventual prosecution.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:



Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74757053Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciOn March 24, 2023, Magistrate Judge Megan Marshall issued an order addressing how much of a stipulation concerning the release of property in the Bryan Kohberger case could be made public. The dispute followed the State’s request to temporarily seal...
Marshall ultimately chose partial secrecy rather than sealing everything connected to the matter. Exhibits A and B attached to the Stipulation to Release Property were ordered completely sealed, while the stipulation itself and the corresponding Order to Release Property were permitted to become public only after certain information was redacted. The restrictions were ordered to remain in place until the court directed otherwise. The ruling was representative of the intense secrecy that surrounded the Kohberger investigation during its early stages, when the court repeatedly had to balance extraordinary public interest in the case against concerns that releasing investigative details, private information or sensitive evidence too early could compromise individuals involved or prejudice the eventual prosecution.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:



Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>604bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/bill-clinton-and-the-transcript-from-his-epstein-related-interview-with-congress-part-12-8-30-26--74748365Bill Clinton’s February 27, 2026 testimony before the House Oversight Committee finally forced him to answer under oath about a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that had generated questions for decades, but the proceeding hardly delivered the kind of exhaustive accounting the public had been promised. Clinton insisted that he had “done nothing wrong,” knew nothing about Epstein’s abuse and never witnessed anything that caused him concern, effectively asking lawmakers to accept that his repeated contact with Epstein, travel aboard Epstein’s aircraft and proximity to Ghislaine Maxwell never exposed him to anything suspicious. That explanation deserved considerably more scrutiny than it received. Clinton had not volunteered for the deposition either. He resisted the committee’s subpoena, failed to appear for a scheduled January 13 deposition and only agreed to testify after a bipartisan contempt resolution advanced against him. Yet when he finally appeared, even some lawmakers who had spent months demanding answers quickly described him as cooperative and candid. The central problem remained unresolved: Clinton’s defense depended heavily on what he claimed not to have seen, not to have known and not to remember, while the documentary record established that his association with Epstein was substantial enough to demand far more than a polite acceptance of those denials.

The congressional process itself also exposed the weaknesses that have plagued nearly every official examination of Epstein’s network. Rather than methodically reconstructing Clinton’s relationship with Epstein against flight records, photographs, visitor records, witness accounts and contemporaneous communications, the deposition became entangled in the same partisan warfare that repeatedly consumes the Epstein investigation. Republicans emphasized Clinton while Democrats complained that Donald Trump had not been subpoenaed, and Chairman James Comer immediately used Clinton’s answers to make political claims about Trump rather than keeping the focus exclusively on Epstein and the unanswered questions surrounding Clinton himself. Clinton’s testimony therefore produced another familiar outcome: a powerful person denied knowledge of Epstein’s crimes, lawmakers divided themselves into political camps, and very little was done to independently test how plausible those denials actually were. Clinton’s appearance was historically significant because Congress compelled a former president to testify, but significance should not be confused with accountability. After years of questions about one of the most prominent men in Epstein’s orbit, the public was still largely left with Clinton’s version of events and a congressional process that appeared more interested in scoring partisan points than aggressively determining whether that version could withstand sustained scrutiny.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74748365Sun, 30 Aug 2026 22:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBill Clinton’s February 27, 2026 testimony before the House Oversight Committee finally forced him to answer under oath about a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that had generated questions for decades, but the proceeding hardly delivered the kind of...Bill Clinton’s February 27, 2026 testimony before the House Oversight Committee finally forced him to answer under oath about a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that had generated questions for decades, but the proceeding hardly delivered the kind of exhaustive accounting the public had been promised. Clinton insisted that he had “done nothing wrong,” knew nothing about Epstein’s abuse and never witnessed anything that caused him concern, effectively asking lawmakers to accept that his repeated contact with Epstein, travel aboard Epstein’s aircraft and proximity to Ghislaine Maxwell never exposed him to anything suspicious. That explanation deserved considerably more scrutiny than it received. Clinton had not volunteered for the deposition either. He resisted the committee’s subpoena, failed to appear for a scheduled January 13 deposition and only agreed to testify after a bipartisan contempt resolution advanced against him. Yet when he finally appeared, even some lawmakers who had spent months demanding answers quickly described him as cooperative and candid. The central problem remained unresolved: Clinton’s defense depended heavily on what he claimed not to have seen, not to have known and not to remember, while the documentary record established that his association with Epstein was substantial enough to demand far more than a polite acceptance of those denials.

The congressional process itself also exposed the weaknesses that have plagued nearly every official examination of Epstein’s network. Rather than methodically reconstructing Clinton’s relationship with Epstein against flight records, photographs, visitor records, witness accounts and contemporaneous communications, the deposition became entangled in the same partisan warfare that repeatedly consumes the Epstein investigation. Republicans emphasized Clinton while Democrats complained that Donald Trump had not been subpoenaed, and Chairman James Comer immediately used Clinton’s answers to make political claims about Trump rather than keeping the focus exclusively on Epstein and the unanswered questions surrounding Clinton himself. Clinton’s testimony therefore produced another familiar outcome: a powerful person denied knowledge of Epstein’s crimes, lawmakers divided themselves into political camps, and very little was done to independently test how plausible those denials actually were. Clinton’s appearance was historically significant because Congress compelled a former president to testify, but significance should not be confused with accountability. After years of questions about one of the most prominent men in Epstein’s orbit, the public was still largely left with Clinton’s version of events and a congressional process that appeared more interested in scoring partisan points than aggressively determining whether that version could withstand sustained scrutiny.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>974epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/bill-clinton-and-the-transcript-from-his-epstein-related-interview-with-congress-part-11-8-30-26--74748364Bill Clinton’s February 27, 2026 testimony before the House Oversight Committee finally forced him to answer under oath about a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that had generated questions for decades, but the proceeding hardly delivered the kind of exhaustive accounting the public had been promised. Clinton insisted that he had “done nothing wrong,” knew nothing about Epstein’s abuse and never witnessed anything that caused him concern, effectively asking lawmakers to accept that his repeated contact with Epstein, travel aboard Epstein’s aircraft and proximity to Ghislaine Maxwell never exposed him to anything suspicious. That explanation deserved considerably more scrutiny than it received. Clinton had not volunteered for the deposition either. He resisted the committee’s subpoena, failed to appear for a scheduled January 13 deposition and only agreed to testify after a bipartisan contempt resolution advanced against him. Yet when he finally appeared, even some lawmakers who had spent months demanding answers quickly described him as cooperative and candid. The central problem remained unresolved: Clinton’s defense depended heavily on what he claimed not to have seen, not to have known and not to remember, while the documentary record established that his association with Epstein was substantial enough to demand far more than a polite acceptance of those denials.

The congressional process itself also exposed the weaknesses that have plagued nearly every official examination of Epstein’s network. Rather than methodically reconstructing Clinton’s relationship with Epstein against flight records, photographs, visitor records, witness accounts and contemporaneous communications, the deposition became entangled in the same partisan warfare that repeatedly consumes the Epstein investigation. Republicans emphasized Clinton while Democrats complained that Donald Trump had not been subpoenaed, and Chairman James Comer immediately used Clinton’s answers to make political claims about Trump rather than keeping the focus exclusively on Epstein and the unanswered questions surrounding Clinton himself. Clinton’s testimony therefore produced another familiar outcome: a powerful person denied knowledge of Epstein’s crimes, lawmakers divided themselves into political camps, and very little was done to independently test how plausible those denials actually were. Clinton’s appearance was historically significant because Congress compelled a former president to testify, but significance should not be confused with accountability. After years of questions about one of the most prominent men in Epstein’s orbit, the public was still largely left with Clinton’s version of events and a congressional process that appeared more interested in scoring partisan points than aggressively determining whether that version could withstand sustained scrutiny.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74748364Sun, 30 Aug 2026 20:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBill Clinton’s February 27, 2026 testimony before the House Oversight Committee finally forced him to answer under oath about a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that had generated questions for decades, but the proceeding hardly delivered the kind of...Bill Clinton’s February 27, 2026 testimony before the House Oversight Committee finally forced him to answer under oath about a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that had generated questions for decades, but the proceeding hardly delivered the kind of exhaustive accounting the public had been promised. Clinton insisted that he had “done nothing wrong,” knew nothing about Epstein’s abuse and never witnessed anything that caused him concern, effectively asking lawmakers to accept that his repeated contact with Epstein, travel aboard Epstein’s aircraft and proximity to Ghislaine Maxwell never exposed him to anything suspicious. That explanation deserved considerably more scrutiny than it received. Clinton had not volunteered for the deposition either. He resisted the committee’s subpoena, failed to appear for a scheduled January 13 deposition and only agreed to testify after a bipartisan contempt resolution advanced against him. Yet when he finally appeared, even some lawmakers who had spent months demanding answers quickly described him as cooperative and candid. The central problem remained unresolved: Clinton’s defense depended heavily on what he claimed not to have seen, not to have known and not to remember, while the documentary record established that his association with Epstein was substantial enough to demand far more than a polite acceptance of those denials.

The congressional process itself also exposed the weaknesses that have plagued nearly every official examination of Epstein’s network. Rather than methodically reconstructing Clinton’s relationship with Epstein against flight records, photographs, visitor records, witness accounts and contemporaneous communications, the deposition became entangled in the same partisan warfare that repeatedly consumes the Epstein investigation. Republicans emphasized Clinton while Democrats complained that Donald Trump had not been subpoenaed, and Chairman James Comer immediately used Clinton’s answers to make political claims about Trump rather than keeping the focus exclusively on Epstein and the unanswered questions surrounding Clinton himself. Clinton’s testimony therefore produced another familiar outcome: a powerful person denied knowledge of Epstein’s crimes, lawmakers divided themselves into political camps, and very little was done to independently test how plausible those denials actually were. Clinton’s appearance was historically significant because Congress compelled a former president to testify, but significance should not be confused with accountability. After years of questions about one of the most prominent men in Epstein’s orbit, the public was still largely left with Clinton’s version of events and a congressional process that appeared more interested in scoring partisan points than aggressively determining whether that version could withstand sustained scrutiny.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1234epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/seymour-hersh-claims-epstein-intelligence-material-is-still-being-withheld-8-29-26--74748064
The claims remain allegations attributed to Hersh and his source, not independently established facts, but they add another layer to the broader fight over what the federal government is still withholding. Hersh’s reporting suggests that Epstein may have had relationships or performed services involving several foreign governments, including Israel, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Russia, while lawmakers have separately begun examining the possibility of intelligence connections. The most politically significant portion of the report is the suggestion that unreleased information could implicate or embarrass people associated with Trump’s past and present administrations, particularly because the Justice Department has already faced intense criticism over redactions and withheld Epstein material. If Hersh’s account is accurate, the central question is no longer simply what remains hidden in the Epstein files, but why intelligence-related records allegedly sitting inside government archives have remained outside the public release and largely beyond serious congressional examination.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

'Distressing discussion' on withheld Epstein files reveals 'problems' for Trump: report - Raw Story

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74748064Sun, 30 Aug 2026 18:30:03 +0000Bobby CapucciVeteran investigative journalist Seymour Hersh says a longtime, well-informed international source told him that significant Jeffrey Epstein material remains inside government files and has not yet been made public by the Justice Department. According...
The claims remain allegations attributed to Hersh and his source, not independently established facts, but they add another layer to the broader fight over what the federal government is still withholding. Hersh’s reporting suggests that Epstein may have had relationships or performed services involving several foreign governments, including Israel, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Russia, while lawmakers have separately begun examining the possibility of intelligence connections. The most politically significant portion of the report is the suggestion that unreleased information could implicate or embarrass people associated with Trump’s past and present administrations, particularly because the Justice Department has already faced intense criticism over redactions and withheld Epstein material. If Hersh’s account is accurate, the central question is no longer simply what remains hidden in the Epstein files, but why intelligence-related records allegedly sitting inside government archives have remained outside the public release and largely beyond serious congressional examination.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

'Distressing discussion' on withheld Epstein files reveals 'problems' for Trump: report - Raw Story

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>669bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-the-experts-behind-the-case-against-bryan-kohberger-part-9-8-30-26--74757038
Sutton’s role became especially important because the defense retained its own crime-scene reconstruction experts, including Matthew Noedel and Dr. Brent Turvey, who challenged portions of the prosecution’s interpretation of the physical evidence. Her revised report therefore did more than simply describe the blood evidence; it also responded to those competing defense theories and explained why she believed certain features of the scene supported her conclusions. Had Kohberger’s case gone to trial, Sutton was expected to help prosecutors walk jurors through the bloodstain evidence and explain what it suggested about movement, contact and activity inside the house during and after the attacks. In that sense, she would have been one of the State’s key witnesses for translating the chaotic physical scene into a forensic reconstruction of how prosecutors believed the murders unfolded.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source: 

030326+REDACTED+Exhibits+S-1+through+S-13+to+States+Amended+Supp+Resp+to+Rqst+for+Disc+RE+Expert+Testimony.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74757038Sun, 30 Aug 2026 16:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciPaulette Sutton was one of the prosecution’s forensic experts in the case against Bryan Kohberger, and her specialty was crime-scene reconstruction and bloodstain-pattern analysis. Sutton reviewed the blood evidence documented inside 1122 King Road,...
Sutton’s role became especially important because the defense retained its own crime-scene reconstruction experts, including Matthew Noedel and Dr. Brent Turvey, who challenged portions of the prosecution’s interpretation of the physical evidence. Her revised report therefore did more than simply describe the blood evidence; it also responded to those competing defense theories and explained why she believed certain features of the scene supported her conclusions. Had Kohberger’s case gone to trial, Sutton was expected to help prosecutors walk jurors through the bloodstain evidence and explain what it suggested about movement, contact and activity inside the house during and after the attacks. In that sense, she would have been one of the State’s key witnesses for translating the chaotic physical scene into a forensic reconstruction of how prosecutors believed the murders unfolded.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source: 

030326+REDACTED+Exhibits+S-1+through+S-13+to+States+Amended+Supp+Resp+to+Rqst+for+Disc+RE+Expert+Testimony.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>626bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-the-weird-interactions-before-the-murders-8-30-26--74748188Long before the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, Bryan Kohberger had accumulated a number of troubling complaints involving women and his behavior around them. One woman who met him through Tinder years earlier said their date became so uncomfortable that she pretended to vomit in order to get him to leave her apartment; she claimed Kohberger repeatedly touched her despite her objections and later texted her that she had “good birthing hips.” Other accounts surfaced from his time at Washington State University, where female students and staff reportedly complained that Kohberger lingered in offices, blocked doorways, followed women to their cars and made them feel unsafe. Some women were reportedly given security escorts after dark, and faculty members told investigators that multiple complaints had been made about Kohberger’s treatment of women. One instructor said the concerns became serious enough that his conduct was repeatedly discussed in disciplinary meetings and that the program eventually held behavioral training for graduate students.


Those incidents were not limited to graduate school. A former administrator at a Pennsylvania technical school said Kohberger had been removed from a high-school law-enforcement program after female students complained about him, forcing him to transfer into another vocational track. At WSU, meanwhile, reports described professors intervening when female students appeared trapped or uncomfortable around him, and some students reportedly kept office doors closed to prevent him from entering. Investigators later received additional accounts from women who said Kohberger had followed or persistently approached them despite their attempts to disengage. None of those earlier incidents proved that Kohberger would go on to commit murder, and they were not themselves evidence of what happened inside the King Road house, but after his arrest they took on much greater significance because they revealed a documented pattern of interpersonal problems, particularly involving women, that stretched across different periods of his life and existed well before November 13, 2022








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74748188Sun, 30 Aug 2026 14:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciLong before the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, Bryan Kohberger had accumulated a number of troubling complaints involving women and his behavior around them. One woman who met him through Tinder years...Long before the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, Bryan Kohberger had accumulated a number of troubling complaints involving women and his behavior around them. One woman who met him through Tinder years earlier said their date became so uncomfortable that she pretended to vomit in order to get him to leave her apartment; she claimed Kohberger repeatedly touched her despite her objections and later texted her that she had “good birthing hips.” Other accounts surfaced from his time at Washington State University, where female students and staff reportedly complained that Kohberger lingered in offices, blocked doorways, followed women to their cars and made them feel unsafe. Some women were reportedly given security escorts after dark, and faculty members told investigators that multiple complaints had been made about Kohberger’s treatment of women. One instructor said the concerns became serious enough that his conduct was repeatedly discussed in disciplinary meetings and that the program eventually held behavioral training for graduate students.


Those incidents were not limited to graduate school. A former administrator at a Pennsylvania technical school said Kohberger had been removed from a high-school law-enforcement program after female students complained about him, forcing him to transfer into another vocational track. At WSU, meanwhile, reports described professors intervening when female students appeared trapped or uncomfortable around him, and some students reportedly kept office doors closed to prevent him from entering. Investigators later received additional accounts from women who said Kohberger had followed or persistently approached them despite their attempts to disengage. None of those earlier incidents proved that Kohberger would go on to commit murder, and they were not themselves evidence of what happened inside the King Road house, but after his arrest they took on much greater significance because they revealed a documented pattern of interpersonal problems, particularly involving women, that stretched across different periods of his life and existed well before November 13, 2022








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3090bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-the-state-battle-over-i-c-r-sanctions-8-30-26--74748187Bryan Kohberger’s defense and the State of Idaho fought over whether prosecutors had complied with Idaho Criminal Rule 16(b)(7), which governed disclosure of expert witnesses and the substance of their expected testimony. In December 2024, Kohberger’s attorneys asked Judge Steven Hippler to compel more complete disclosures and sanction the prosecution, arguing that the state had identified roughly 25 experts but had supplied actual reports for only a handful of them. The defense said major areas of the case, including DNA, digital forensics and other technical evidence, were represented by disclosures that were too vague to reveal the experts’ actual opinions, methods and conclusions. Kohberger’s lawyers argued that this left them trying to prepare their own expert case without knowing precisely what the prosecution intended to present, despite a looming deadline for defense expert disclosures. They asked Hippler to consider excluding inadequately disclosed state experts or, at minimum, order fuller disclosure and push back the defense’s deadline.

Prosecutors pushed back hard, arguing that they had been continuously producing discovery and expert-related material throughout the case and that the defense was overstating both the deficiencies and what Rule 16 actually required. The state maintained that expert discovery was an ongoing process, that it had complied with its obligations as information became available, and that the drastic remedy of excluding experts or imposing sanctions was unwarranted. The dispute therefore became about much more than paperwork: Kohberger’s team framed it as a fair-trial problem in a capital case, saying it could not meaningfully prepare to confront expert testimony it had not fully seen, while prosecutors portrayed the motion as an attempt to punish the state despite an enormous and continuously developing discovery record. The fight illustrated just how technical the case had become, with both sides battling not only over what evidence existed, but over exactly when expert opinions had to be disclosed, how detailed those disclosures had to be and what consequences should follow if the court found that either side had fallen short.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74748187Sun, 30 Aug 2026 12:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBryan Kohberger’s defense and the State of Idaho fought over whether prosecutors had complied with Idaho Criminal Rule 16(b)(7), which governed disclosure of expert witnesses and the substance of their expected testimony. In December 2024, Kohberger’s...Bryan Kohberger’s defense and the State of Idaho fought over whether prosecutors had complied with Idaho Criminal Rule 16(b)(7), which governed disclosure of expert witnesses and the substance of their expected testimony. In December 2024, Kohberger’s attorneys asked Judge Steven Hippler to compel more complete disclosures and sanction the prosecution, arguing that the state had identified roughly 25 experts but had supplied actual reports for only a handful of them. The defense said major areas of the case, including DNA, digital forensics and other technical evidence, were represented by disclosures that were too vague to reveal the experts’ actual opinions, methods and conclusions. Kohberger’s lawyers argued that this left them trying to prepare their own expert case without knowing precisely what the prosecution intended to present, despite a looming deadline for defense expert disclosures. They asked Hippler to consider excluding inadequately disclosed state experts or, at minimum, order fuller disclosure and push back the defense’s deadline.

Prosecutors pushed back hard, arguing that they had been continuously producing discovery and expert-related material throughout the case and that the defense was overstating both the deficiencies and what Rule 16 actually required. The state maintained that expert discovery was an ongoing process, that it had complied with its obligations as information became available, and that the drastic remedy of excluding experts or imposing sanctions was unwarranted. The dispute therefore became about much more than paperwork: Kohberger’s team framed it as a fair-trial problem in a capital case, saying it could not meaningfully prepare to confront expert testimony it had not fully seen, while prosecutors portrayed the motion as an attempt to punish the state despite an enormous and continuously developing discovery record. The fight illustrated just how technical the case had become, with both sides battling not only over what evidence existed, but over exactly when expert opinions had to be disclosed, how detailed those disclosures had to be and what consequences should follow if the court found that either side had fallen short.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2622bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-moscow-police-respond-to-rumors-early-on-8-30-26--74748186In the first weeks after the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, Moscow police repeatedly pushed back against the flood of rumors, amateur theories and outright misinformation spreading online. Chief James Fry and other investigators stressed that the department was receiving thousands of tips but warned the public not to confuse speculation with evidence. Police addressed rumors involving people seen at the food truck, the victims’ friends and acquaintances, a private driver, a dog found at the residence and other individuals who became targets of intense online suspicion. Fry made clear that investigators were following evidence rather than social-media narratives and repeatedly said that people who had been publicly accused or scrutinized had been investigated and, in many cases, cleared. The department also warned that false information was consuming investigative resources because detectives had to spend time sorting legitimate leads from internet-generated noise.

Fry was especially firm about the harm caused when online sleuths publicly identified people as suspects without evidence. Moscow police said rumors could damage innocent people, interfere with the investigation and create unnecessary fear in the community. The department urged anyone with actual information to send it directly to investigators instead of posting theories publicly, and it regularly updated its website to correct false claims and clarify what investigators did and did not know. Fry acknowledged the intense public interest in the case but emphasized that police could not release every detail simply to satisfy speculation because doing so could compromise the investigation. The message from Moscow police was consistent throughout those early weeks: investigators understood that people wanted answers, but they believed the constant churn of rumors, accusations and amateur detective work was more likely to hinder the search for the killer than help it.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74748186Sun, 30 Aug 2026 10:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn the first weeks after the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, Moscow police repeatedly pushed back against the flood of rumors, amateur theories and outright misinformation spreading online. Chief James Fry...In the first weeks after the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, Moscow police repeatedly pushed back against the flood of rumors, amateur theories and outright misinformation spreading online. Chief James Fry and other investigators stressed that the department was receiving thousands of tips but warned the public not to confuse speculation with evidence. Police addressed rumors involving people seen at the food truck, the victims’ friends and acquaintances, a private driver, a dog found at the residence and other individuals who became targets of intense online suspicion. Fry made clear that investigators were following evidence rather than social-media narratives and repeatedly said that people who had been publicly accused or scrutinized had been investigated and, in many cases, cleared. The department also warned that false information was consuming investigative resources because detectives had to spend time sorting legitimate leads from internet-generated noise.

Fry was especially firm about the harm caused when online sleuths publicly identified people as suspects without evidence. Moscow police said rumors could damage innocent people, interfere with the investigation and create unnecessary fear in the community. The department urged anyone with actual information to send it directly to investigators instead of posting theories publicly, and it regularly updated its website to correct false claims and clarify what investigators did and did not know. Fry acknowledged the intense public interest in the case but emphasized that police could not release every detail simply to satisfy speculation because doing so could compromise the investigation. The message from Moscow police was consistent throughout those early weeks: investigators understood that people wanted answers, but they believed the constant churn of rumors, accusations and amateur detective work was more likely to hinder the search for the killer than help it.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3160bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-tova-noel-and-her-transcript-from-her-congressional-testimony-part-8-10-8-30-26--74748334
Noel denied having any role in Epstein’s death, receiving money in connection with him or knowing anything about an alleged payment to facilitate access to his cell. She also rejected claims that she was the unidentified orange-colored figure seen moving toward Epstein’s tier at approximately 10:39 p.m., insisting that she never returned to the area and could not explain what—or who—the surveillance image showed. Although Noel said she believed Epstein died by suicide because he was supposedly alone inside the cell, her testimony did little to resolve the most important unanswered questions: why required checks were abandoned, why Epstein remained without a cellmate, who or what appeared near the tier, and how so many security procedures failed simultaneously. Instead, her account reinforced the picture of extraordinary negligence, special treatment and institutional dysfunction surrounding the death of the most consequential prisoner in federal custody.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74748334Sun, 30 Aug 2026 08:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciTova Noel, one of the two correctional officers assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center’s Special Housing Unit on the night Jeffrey Epstein died, told the House Oversight Committee that she failed to conduct the required inmate checks and...
Noel denied having any role in Epstein’s death, receiving money in connection with him or knowing anything about an alleged payment to facilitate access to his cell. She also rejected claims that she was the unidentified orange-colored figure seen moving toward Epstein’s tier at approximately 10:39 p.m., insisting that she never returned to the area and could not explain what—or who—the surveillance image showed. Although Noel said she believed Epstein died by suicide because he was supposedly alone inside the cell, her testimony did little to resolve the most important unanswered questions: why required checks were abandoned, why Epstein remained without a cellmate, who or what appeared near the tier, and how so many security procedures failed simultaneously. Instead, her account reinforced the picture of extraordinary negligence, special treatment and institutional dysfunction surrounding the death of the most consequential prisoner in federal custody.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2398epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-tova-noel-and-her-transcript-from-her-congressional-testimony-part-4-7-8-29-26--74748333
Noel denied having any role in Epstein’s death, receiving money in connection with him or knowing anything about an alleged payment to facilitate access to his cell. She also rejected claims that she was the unidentified orange-colored figure seen moving toward Epstein’s tier at approximately 10:39 p.m., insisting that she never returned to the area and could not explain what—or who—the surveillance image showed. Although Noel said she believed Epstein died by suicide because he was supposedly alone inside the cell, her testimony did little to resolve the most important unanswered questions: why required checks were abandoned, why Epstein remained without a cellmate, who or what appeared near the tier, and how so many security procedures failed simultaneously. Instead, her account reinforced the picture of extraordinary negligence, special treatment and institutional dysfunction surrounding the death of the most consequential prisoner in federal custody.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74748333Sun, 30 Aug 2026 06:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciTova Noel, one of the two correctional officers assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center’s Special Housing Unit on the night Jeffrey Epstein died, told the House Oversight Committee that she failed to conduct the required inmate checks and...
Noel denied having any role in Epstein’s death, receiving money in connection with him or knowing anything about an alleged payment to facilitate access to his cell. She also rejected claims that she was the unidentified orange-colored figure seen moving toward Epstein’s tier at approximately 10:39 p.m., insisting that she never returned to the area and could not explain what—or who—the surveillance image showed. Although Noel said she believed Epstein died by suicide because he was supposedly alone inside the cell, her testimony did little to resolve the most important unanswered questions: why required checks were abandoned, why Epstein remained without a cellmate, who or what appeared near the tier, and how so many security procedures failed simultaneously. Instead, her account reinforced the picture of extraordinary negligence, special treatment and institutional dysfunction surrounding the death of the most consequential prisoner in federal custody.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3069epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-bethany-funke-dylan-mortensen-and-the-text-messages--74748193
Despite their immediate alarm, the roommates did not contact emergency services until later that morning. Mortensen continued her attempts to reach their roommates, sending a text to Kaylee Goncalves at 10:23 a.m., asking, "Ru up??" When there was no reply, a 911 call was placed over an hour later. The transcript of this call reveals a scene of chaos and confusion, with Mortensen and Funke, along with an unidentified friend, initially reporting Kernodle as unconscious, mentioning her alcohol consumption the previous night. They struggled to provide their address, and the dispatcher concluded the call upon the arrival of emergency responders, without obtaining a complete account of the night's events.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

Bryan Kohberger case: Idaho court releases surviving housemates' text messages | Fox News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74748193Sun, 30 Aug 2026 04:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciRecent court documents have unveiled text messages exchanged between the two surviving roommates, Dylan Mortensen and Bethany Funke, during the tragic events of November 13, 2022, in Moscow, Idaho. These messages provide a harrowing glimpse into their...
Despite their immediate alarm, the roommates did not contact emergency services until later that morning. Mortensen continued her attempts to reach their roommates, sending a text to Kaylee Goncalves at 10:23 a.m., asking, "Ru up??" When there was no reply, a 911 call was placed over an hour later. The transcript of this call reveals a scene of chaos and confusion, with Mortensen and Funke, along with an unidentified friend, initially reporting Kernodle as unconscious, mentioning her alcohol consumption the previous night. They struggled to provide their address, and the dispatcher concluded the call upon the arrival of emergency responders, without obtaining a complete account of the night's events.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

Bryan Kohberger case: Idaho court releases surviving housemates' text messages | Fox News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>779bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-what-the-investigation-into-the-murders-in-moscow-looked-like-after-7-months--74748192At roughly the seven-month mark after the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, the case had moved from an unexplained quadruple homicide into a formal prosecution against Bryan Kohberger. By then, investigators had alleged that the murders occurred around 4 a.m. on November 13, 2022, that a knife sheath bearing Kohberger’s DNA was found beside Mogen’s body, and that surviving roommate Dylan Mortensen had seen a masked man dressed in black walking through the house before leaving through the sliding glass door. Police had also tied a white Hyundai Elantra to the area around King Road, examined Kohberger’s cellphone activity and built a circumstantial timeline around his movements before and after the killings. Kohberger, a Washington State University criminology graduate student at the time of his arrest, had been taken into custody at his family’s Pennsylvania home in late December 2022 and extradited back to Idaho, where he faced four counts of first-degree murder and one count of burglary.

By May 2023, the case was entering another major phase. A grand jury had indicted Kohberger, eliminating the preliminary hearing that had originally been scheduled and sending the case directly toward arraignment and trial. Yet even with a suspect in custody and considerably more evidence public than during the chaotic first weeks of the investigation, major questions remained unanswered. The murder weapon had not been recovered, prosecutors had not publicly established a motive, there was still no clear explanation for why these four victims or the King Road house had allegedly been targeted, and the full significance of the DNA, cellphone and vehicle evidence remained to be tested in court. Seven months after the murders, the mystery had therefore narrowed dramatically, but it had not disappeared: the central question was no longer simply who police believed committed the killings, but whether the evidence they had assembled could prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Bryan Kohberger was the man responsible.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com









Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74748192Sun, 30 Aug 2026 02:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciAt roughly the seven-month mark after the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, the case had moved from an unexplained quadruple homicide into a formal prosecution against Bryan Kohberger. By then, investigators...At roughly the seven-month mark after the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, the case had moved from an unexplained quadruple homicide into a formal prosecution against Bryan Kohberger. By then, investigators had alleged that the murders occurred around 4 a.m. on November 13, 2022, that a knife sheath bearing Kohberger’s DNA was found beside Mogen’s body, and that surviving roommate Dylan Mortensen had seen a masked man dressed in black walking through the house before leaving through the sliding glass door. Police had also tied a white Hyundai Elantra to the area around King Road, examined Kohberger’s cellphone activity and built a circumstantial timeline around his movements before and after the killings. Kohberger, a Washington State University criminology graduate student at the time of his arrest, had been taken into custody at his family’s Pennsylvania home in late December 2022 and extradited back to Idaho, where he faced four counts of first-degree murder and one count of burglary.

By May 2023, the case was entering another major phase. A grand jury had indicted Kohberger, eliminating the preliminary hearing that had originally been scheduled and sending the case directly toward arraignment and trial. Yet even with a suspect in custody and considerably more evidence public than during the chaotic first weeks of the investigation, major questions remained unanswered. The murder weapon had not been recovered, prosecutors had not publicly established a motive, there was still no clear explanation for why these four victims or the King Road house had allegedly been targeted, and the full significance of the DNA, cellphone and vehicle evidence remained to be tested in court. Seven months after the murders, the mystery had therefore narrowed dramatically, but it had not disappeared: the central question was no longer simply who police believed committed the killings, but whether the evidence they had assembled could prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Bryan Kohberger was the man responsible.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com









Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1321falsefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcripts-day-1-part-11-8-30-26--74748073
The defense spent much of the first day attacking the manner in which the prosecution was getting its evidence into the record rather than attempting to disprove the entire prosecution theory at that stage. Kathryn Nester and Robinson’s attorneys repeatedly raised hearsay, foundation and authentication objections, arguing that investigators were being permitted to introduce reports, statements and records created by other people without those individuals appearing personally to testify. Judge Graf overruled most of those objections, reflecting the substantially lower evidentiary threshold governing a Utah preliminary hearing, whose purpose was only to determine whether probable cause existed to send Robinson to trial rather than whether prosecutors could prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. One significant exception involved an edited compilation of surveillance footage, which Graf declined to admit in that form and required prosecutors to replace with the underlying unedited material. Hull’s testimony also revealed the scope of the prosecution’s surveillance theory: investigators claimed Robinson had appeared on or around the UVU campus multiple times on September 10 and that they were attempting to stitch those appearances together into a continuous identification of the alleged shooter. By the end of day one, prosecutors had established the killing itself, the medical cause of Kirk’s death, the existence and authenticity of substantial video evidence and the beginnings of their effort to identify Robinson as the person captured in that footage. They had not yet presented many of the pieces expected to become more consequential later in the hearing, including the rifle and DNA evidence, Robinson’s alleged communications and admissions, and testimony concerning his roommate Lance Twiggs.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74748073Sun, 30 Aug 2026 00:30:04 +0000Bobby CapucciDay one of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing on July 6, 2026, largely centered on prosecutors beginning to construct a timeline of Charlie Kirk’s killing at Utah Valley University and establishing the authenticity of the surveillance footage and...
The defense spent much of the first day attacking the manner in which the prosecution was getting its evidence into the record rather than attempting to disprove the entire prosecution theory at that stage. Kathryn Nester and Robinson’s attorneys repeatedly raised hearsay, foundation and authentication objections, arguing that investigators were being permitted to introduce reports, statements and records created by other people without those individuals appearing personally to testify. Judge Graf overruled most of those objections, reflecting the substantially lower evidentiary threshold governing a Utah preliminary hearing, whose purpose was only to determine whether probable cause existed to send Robinson to trial rather than whether prosecutors could prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. One significant exception involved an edited compilation of surveillance footage, which Graf declined to admit in that form and required prosecutors to replace with the underlying unedited material. Hull’s testimony also revealed the scope of the prosecution’s surveillance theory: investigators claimed Robinson had appeared on or around the UVU campus multiple times on September 10 and that they were attempting to stitch those appearances together into a continuous identification of the alleged shooter. By the end of day one, prosecutors had established the killing itself, the medical cause of Kirk’s death, the existence and authenticity of substantial video evidence and the beginnings of their effort to identify Robinson as the person captured in that footage. They had not yet presented many of the pieces expected to become more consequential later in the hearing, including the rifle and DNA evidence, Robinson’s alleged communications and admissions, and testimony concerning his roommate Lance Twiggs.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>702breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-banking-settlements-that-undercut-the-epstein-hoax-narrative-8-29-26--74748063

The larger point is not that every person associated with Epstein is guilty or that every theory about his operation has been proven. It is that the documented record is already damning enough without exaggeration. Survivors use civil courts to obtain answers, records, testimony and financial accountability that the criminal justice system never fully produces, especially after Epstein dies before trial. In that sense, civil litigation becomes one of the few mechanisms capable of forcing powerful institutions to confront their relationships with him. Calling the entire scandal a hoax requires ignoring the settlements, the regulatory findings, the banking records and the repeated willingness of major institutions to pay enormous sums rather than continue fighting these cases. If someone still wants to dismiss Epstein as a fabrication, they are left with one brutally simple question: if there is really nothing there, what exactly are all these banks paying for?



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74748063Sun, 30 Aug 2026 00:30:04 +0000Bobby CapucciThe claim that the Jeffrey Epstein scandal is somehow a hoax becomes increasingly difficult to square with the enormous sums major financial institutions are paying to resolve claims brought by survivors. JPMorgan agrees to a roughly $290 million...

The larger point is not that every person associated with Epstein is guilty or that every theory about his operation has been proven. It is that the documented record is already damning enough without exaggeration. Survivors use civil courts to obtain answers, records, testimony and financial accountability that the criminal justice system never fully produces, especially after Epstein dies before trial. In that sense, civil litigation becomes one of the few mechanisms capable of forcing powerful institutions to confront their relationships with him. Calling the entire scandal a hoax requires ignoring the settlements, the regulatory findings, the banking records and the repeated willingness of major institutions to pay enormous sums rather than continue fighting these cases. If someone still wants to dismiss Epstein as a fabrication, they are left with one brutally simple question: if there is really nothing there, what exactly are all these banks paying for?



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1121epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/maxwell-family-condemns-judge-s-rejection-of-post-conviction-claims-8-30-26--74748368
Maxwell’s family nevertheless says she is not finished and is encouraging her to seek a certificate of appealability so she can take the case back to the Second Circuit. They maintain that Engelmayer’s ruling contains specific legal errors that deserve further review and say Maxwell will continue pursuing every available avenue. The judge, however, strongly defended the legitimacy of the prosecution, rejecting Maxwell’s claim that she had been selectively targeted as a substitute for Epstein after his death and writing that the evidence at trial established her knowing participation in enabling Epstein’s abuse of underage girls. Maxwell remains sentenced to 20 years in federal prison, her conviction has already been upheld by the Second Circuit, and the U.S. Supreme Court has previously declined to hear her case. Her latest challenge therefore leaves her in much the same legal position as before, but with her family making clear that they intend to keep pushing for another round of appellate review.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74748368Sat, 29 Aug 2026 22:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciGhislaine Maxwell’s family says she intends to continue fighting her conviction even after U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer rejected her latest effort to overturn it. In a statement released after the ruling, her relatives called the decision...
Maxwell’s family nevertheless says she is not finished and is encouraging her to seek a certificate of appealability so she can take the case back to the Second Circuit. They maintain that Engelmayer’s ruling contains specific legal errors that deserve further review and say Maxwell will continue pursuing every available avenue. The judge, however, strongly defended the legitimacy of the prosecution, rejecting Maxwell’s claim that she had been selectively targeted as a substitute for Epstein after his death and writing that the evidence at trial established her knowing participation in enabling Epstein’s abuse of underage girls. Maxwell remains sentenced to 20 years in federal prison, her conviction has already been upheld by the Second Circuit, and the U.S. Supreme Court has previously declined to hear her case. Her latest challenge therefore leaves her in much the same legal position as before, but with her family making clear that they intend to keep pushing for another round of appellate review.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>652epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/bill-clinton-and-the-transcript-from-his-epstein-related-interview-with-congress-part-10-8-29-26--74737926Bill Clinton’s February 27, 2026 testimony before the House Oversight Committee finally forced him to answer under oath about a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that had generated questions for decades, but the proceeding hardly delivered the kind of exhaustive accounting the public had been promised. Clinton insisted that he had “done nothing wrong,” knew nothing about Epstein’s abuse and never witnessed anything that caused him concern, effectively asking lawmakers to accept that his repeated contact with Epstein, travel aboard Epstein’s aircraft and proximity to Ghislaine Maxwell never exposed him to anything suspicious. That explanation deserved considerably more scrutiny than it received. Clinton had not volunteered for the deposition either. He resisted the committee’s subpoena, failed to appear for a scheduled January 13 deposition and only agreed to testify after a bipartisan contempt resolution advanced against him. Yet when he finally appeared, even some lawmakers who had spent months demanding answers quickly described him as cooperative and candid. The central problem remained unresolved: Clinton’s defense depended heavily on what he claimed not to have seen, not to have known and not to remember, while the documentary record established that his association with Epstein was substantial enough to demand far more than a polite acceptance of those denials.

The congressional process itself also exposed the weaknesses that have plagued nearly every official examination of Epstein’s network. Rather than methodically reconstructing Clinton’s relationship with Epstein against flight records, photographs, visitor records, witness accounts and contemporaneous communications, the deposition became entangled in the same partisan warfare that repeatedly consumes the Epstein investigation. Republicans emphasized Clinton while Democrats complained that Donald Trump had not been subpoenaed, and Chairman James Comer immediately used Clinton’s answers to make political claims about Trump rather than keeping the focus exclusively on Epstein and the unanswered questions surrounding Clinton himself. Clinton’s testimony therefore produced another familiar outcome: a powerful person denied knowledge of Epstein’s crimes, lawmakers divided themselves into political camps, and very little was done to independently test how plausible those denials actually were. Clinton’s appearance was historically significant because Congress compelled a former president to testify, but significance should not be confused with accountability. After years of questions about one of the most prominent men in Epstein’s orbit, the public was still largely left with Clinton’s version of events and a congressional process that appeared more interested in scoring partisan points than aggressively determining whether that version could withstand sustained scrutiny.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74737926Sat, 29 Aug 2026 22:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBill Clinton’s February 27, 2026 testimony before the House Oversight Committee finally forced him to answer under oath about a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that had generated questions for decades, but the proceeding hardly delivered the kind of...Bill Clinton’s February 27, 2026 testimony before the House Oversight Committee finally forced him to answer under oath about a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that had generated questions for decades, but the proceeding hardly delivered the kind of exhaustive accounting the public had been promised. Clinton insisted that he had “done nothing wrong,” knew nothing about Epstein’s abuse and never witnessed anything that caused him concern, effectively asking lawmakers to accept that his repeated contact with Epstein, travel aboard Epstein’s aircraft and proximity to Ghislaine Maxwell never exposed him to anything suspicious. That explanation deserved considerably more scrutiny than it received. Clinton had not volunteered for the deposition either. He resisted the committee’s subpoena, failed to appear for a scheduled January 13 deposition and only agreed to testify after a bipartisan contempt resolution advanced against him. Yet when he finally appeared, even some lawmakers who had spent months demanding answers quickly described him as cooperative and candid. The central problem remained unresolved: Clinton’s defense depended heavily on what he claimed not to have seen, not to have known and not to remember, while the documentary record established that his association with Epstein was substantial enough to demand far more than a polite acceptance of those denials.

The congressional process itself also exposed the weaknesses that have plagued nearly every official examination of Epstein’s network. Rather than methodically reconstructing Clinton’s relationship with Epstein against flight records, photographs, visitor records, witness accounts and contemporaneous communications, the deposition became entangled in the same partisan warfare that repeatedly consumes the Epstein investigation. Republicans emphasized Clinton while Democrats complained that Donald Trump had not been subpoenaed, and Chairman James Comer immediately used Clinton’s answers to make political claims about Trump rather than keeping the focus exclusively on Epstein and the unanswered questions surrounding Clinton himself. Clinton’s testimony therefore produced another familiar outcome: a powerful person denied knowledge of Epstein’s crimes, lawmakers divided themselves into political camps, and very little was done to independently test how plausible those denials actually were. Clinton’s appearance was historically significant because Congress compelled a former president to testify, but significance should not be confused with accountability. After years of questions about one of the most prominent men in Epstein’s orbit, the public was still largely left with Clinton’s version of events and a congressional process that appeared more interested in scoring partisan points than aggressively determining whether that version could withstand sustained scrutiny.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>832epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/bill-clinton-and-the-transcript-from-his-epstein-related-interview-with-congress-part-9-8-29-26--74737920Bill Clinton’s February 27, 2026 testimony before the House Oversight Committee finally forced him to answer under oath about a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that had generated questions for decades, but the proceeding hardly delivered the kind of exhaustive accounting the public had been promised. Clinton insisted that he had “done nothing wrong,” knew nothing about Epstein’s abuse and never witnessed anything that caused him concern, effectively asking lawmakers to accept that his repeated contact with Epstein, travel aboard Epstein’s aircraft and proximity to Ghislaine Maxwell never exposed him to anything suspicious. That explanation deserved considerably more scrutiny than it received. Clinton had not volunteered for the deposition either. He resisted the committee’s subpoena, failed to appear for a scheduled January 13 deposition and only agreed to testify after a bipartisan contempt resolution advanced against him. Yet when he finally appeared, even some lawmakers who had spent months demanding answers quickly described him as cooperative and candid. The central problem remained unresolved: Clinton’s defense depended heavily on what he claimed not to have seen, not to have known and not to remember, while the documentary record established that his association with Epstein was substantial enough to demand far more than a polite acceptance of those denials.

The congressional process itself also exposed the weaknesses that have plagued nearly every official examination of Epstein’s network. Rather than methodically reconstructing Clinton’s relationship with Epstein against flight records, photographs, visitor records, witness accounts and contemporaneous communications, the deposition became entangled in the same partisan warfare that repeatedly consumes the Epstein investigation. Republicans emphasized Clinton while Democrats complained that Donald Trump had not been subpoenaed, and Chairman James Comer immediately used Clinton’s answers to make political claims about Trump rather than keeping the focus exclusively on Epstein and the unanswered questions surrounding Clinton himself. Clinton’s testimony therefore produced another familiar outcome: a powerful person denied knowledge of Epstein’s crimes, lawmakers divided themselves into political camps, and very little was done to independently test how plausible those denials actually were. Clinton’s appearance was historically significant because Congress compelled a former president to testify, but significance should not be confused with accountability. After years of questions about one of the most prominent men in Epstein’s orbit, the public was still largely left with Clinton’s version of events and a congressional process that appeared more interested in scoring partisan points than aggressively determining whether that version could withstand sustained scrutiny.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74737920Sat, 29 Aug 2026 20:30:01 +0000Bobby CapucciBill Clinton’s February 27, 2026 testimony before the House Oversight Committee finally forced him to answer under oath about a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that had generated questions for decades, but the proceeding hardly delivered the kind of...Bill Clinton’s February 27, 2026 testimony before the House Oversight Committee finally forced him to answer under oath about a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that had generated questions for decades, but the proceeding hardly delivered the kind of exhaustive accounting the public had been promised. Clinton insisted that he had “done nothing wrong,” knew nothing about Epstein’s abuse and never witnessed anything that caused him concern, effectively asking lawmakers to accept that his repeated contact with Epstein, travel aboard Epstein’s aircraft and proximity to Ghislaine Maxwell never exposed him to anything suspicious. That explanation deserved considerably more scrutiny than it received. Clinton had not volunteered for the deposition either. He resisted the committee’s subpoena, failed to appear for a scheduled January 13 deposition and only agreed to testify after a bipartisan contempt resolution advanced against him. Yet when he finally appeared, even some lawmakers who had spent months demanding answers quickly described him as cooperative and candid. The central problem remained unresolved: Clinton’s defense depended heavily on what he claimed not to have seen, not to have known and not to remember, while the documentary record established that his association with Epstein was substantial enough to demand far more than a polite acceptance of those denials.

The congressional process itself also exposed the weaknesses that have plagued nearly every official examination of Epstein’s network. Rather than methodically reconstructing Clinton’s relationship with Epstein against flight records, photographs, visitor records, witness accounts and contemporaneous communications, the deposition became entangled in the same partisan warfare that repeatedly consumes the Epstein investigation. Republicans emphasized Clinton while Democrats complained that Donald Trump had not been subpoenaed, and Chairman James Comer immediately used Clinton’s answers to make political claims about Trump rather than keeping the focus exclusively on Epstein and the unanswered questions surrounding Clinton himself. Clinton’s testimony therefore produced another familiar outcome: a powerful person denied knowledge of Epstein’s crimes, lawmakers divided themselves into political camps, and very little was done to independently test how plausible those denials actually were. Clinton’s appearance was historically significant because Congress compelled a former president to testify, but significance should not be confused with accountability. After years of questions about one of the most prominent men in Epstein’s orbit, the public was still largely left with Clinton’s version of events and a congressional process that appeared more interested in scoring partisan points than aggressively determining whether that version could withstand sustained scrutiny.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>872epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-the-experts-behind-the-case-against-bryan-kohberger-part-8-8-29-26--74748067
Sutton’s role became especially important because the defense retained its own crime-scene reconstruction experts, including Matthew Noedel and Dr. Brent Turvey, who challenged portions of the prosecution’s interpretation of the physical evidence. Her revised report therefore did more than simply describe the blood evidence; it also responded to those competing defense theories and explained why she believed certain features of the scene supported her conclusions. Had Kohberger’s case gone to trial, Sutton was expected to help prosecutors walk jurors through the bloodstain evidence and explain what it suggested about movement, contact and activity inside the house during and after the attacks. In that sense, she would have been one of the State’s key witnesses for translating the chaotic physical scene into a forensic reconstruction of how prosecutors believed the murders unfolded.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source: 

030326+REDACTED+Exhibits+S-1+through+S-13+to+States+Amended+Supp+Resp+to+Rqst+for+Disc+RE+Expert+Testimony.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74748067Sat, 29 Aug 2026 18:30:04 +0000Bobby CapucciPaulette Sutton was one of the prosecution’s forensic experts in the case against Bryan Kohberger, and her specialty was crime-scene reconstruction and bloodstain-pattern analysis. Sutton reviewed the blood evidence documented inside 1122 King Road,...
Sutton’s role became especially important because the defense retained its own crime-scene reconstruction experts, including Matthew Noedel and Dr. Brent Turvey, who challenged portions of the prosecution’s interpretation of the physical evidence. Her revised report therefore did more than simply describe the blood evidence; it also responded to those competing defense theories and explained why she believed certain features of the scene supported her conclusions. Had Kohberger’s case gone to trial, Sutton was expected to help prosecutors walk jurors through the bloodstain evidence and explain what it suggested about movement, contact and activity inside the house during and after the attacks. In that sense, she would have been one of the State’s key witnesses for translating the chaotic physical scene into a forensic reconstruction of how prosecutors believed the murders unfolded.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source: 

030326+REDACTED+Exhibits+S-1+through+S-13+to+States+Amended+Supp+Resp+to+Rqst+for+Disc+RE+Expert+Testimony.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>662bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/prosecutors-documented-epstein-s-npa-breaches-and-still-let-the-deal-stand-8-28-26--74723113
What made the revelations especially significant was that Epstein’s non-prosecution agreement explicitly stated that the breach of even one condition gave the United States the option to terminate the deal and investigate and prosecute Epstein and others for federal crimes. Despite documenting repeated violations, prosecutors did not do that. Sloman acknowledged in the letter that Epstein continued receiving the central benefit of the bargain, freedom from federal prosecution, while the government was not receiving the finality, conservation of resources, punishment and victim restitution that the agreement was supposed to produce. Asked in 2026 why the government had done little more than issue warnings, Sloman said he could not remember the specific reasoning, although he maintained that prosecutors had ultimately treated the matter as a state case and called approval of the deal a “bad call” rather than something nefarious. The documents therefore added another damaging layer to the history of the Epstein prosecution: federal authorities did not merely give Epstein an exceptionally lenient agreement, they apparently documented multiple occasions on which he failed to honor that agreement and still allowed the immunity arrangement protecting him and potential co-conspirators to remain intact.






to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Epstein breached 2007 non-prosecution agreement five times, prosecutors did zip

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74723113Sat, 29 Aug 2026 16:30:01 +0000Bobby CapucciA newly surfaced June 15, 2009 letter from then-acting U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Sloman showed that Jeffrey Epstein had repeatedly violated the terms of his extraordinarily favorable 2007 non-prosecution agreement, yet federal prosecutors in South Florida...
What made the revelations especially significant was that Epstein’s non-prosecution agreement explicitly stated that the breach of even one condition gave the United States the option to terminate the deal and investigate and prosecute Epstein and others for federal crimes. Despite documenting repeated violations, prosecutors did not do that. Sloman acknowledged in the letter that Epstein continued receiving the central benefit of the bargain, freedom from federal prosecution, while the government was not receiving the finality, conservation of resources, punishment and victim restitution that the agreement was supposed to produce. Asked in 2026 why the government had done little more than issue warnings, Sloman said he could not remember the specific reasoning, although he maintained that prosecutors had ultimately treated the matter as a state case and called approval of the deal a “bad call” rather than something nefarious. The documents therefore added another damaging layer to the history of the Epstein prosecution: federal authorities did not merely give Epstein an exceptionally lenient agreement, they apparently documented multiple occasions on which he failed to honor that agreement and still allowed the immunity arrangement protecting him and potential co-conspirators to remain intact.






to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Epstein breached 2007 non-prosecution agreement five times, prosecutors did zip

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1116epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-let-s-meet-judge-hippler-8-29-26--74735659
Hippler became nationally known when the Bryan Kohberger case was transferred from Latah County to Ada County in 2024 and he took over from Judge John Judge. From the beginning, Hippler developed a reputation for running a tightly controlled courtroom, setting firm deadlines and making clear that he expected lawyers on both sides to be prepared and professional. He presided over the enormous volume of pretrial litigation involving the death penalty, expert witnesses, evidentiary disputes, discovery, media access and trial scheduling before Kohberger ultimately pleaded guilty in 2025. Hippler then accepted the plea and sentenced Kohberger to four consecutive life sentences without parole, plus additional punishment for burglary. He remains involved in Kohberger’s subsequent attempt to undo those pleas, including establishing the procedural framework for the post-conviction challenge and a possible evidentiary hearing in 2027. His role in the case has made him one of the most visible judges in Idaho, but his background is notable because he did not come to the bench as a career prosecutor or criminal-defense attorney; much of his pre-judicial experience came from complex civil litigation, and colleagues have described his approach on the bench as methodical, demanding and decidedly resistant to surprises.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74735659Sat, 29 Aug 2026 14:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJudge Steven J. Hippler is an Idaho district judge who has served on the Fourth Judicial District bench since 2013. A Boise native, Hippler earned his undergraduate degree from Boise State University before graduating from the University of Utah...
Hippler became nationally known when the Bryan Kohberger case was transferred from Latah County to Ada County in 2024 and he took over from Judge John Judge. From the beginning, Hippler developed a reputation for running a tightly controlled courtroom, setting firm deadlines and making clear that he expected lawyers on both sides to be prepared and professional. He presided over the enormous volume of pretrial litigation involving the death penalty, expert witnesses, evidentiary disputes, discovery, media access and trial scheduling before Kohberger ultimately pleaded guilty in 2025. Hippler then accepted the plea and sentenced Kohberger to four consecutive life sentences without parole, plus additional punishment for burglary. He remains involved in Kohberger’s subsequent attempt to undo those pleas, including establishing the procedural framework for the post-conviction challenge and a possible evidentiary hearing in 2027. His role in the case has made him one of the most visible judges in Idaho, but his background is notable because he did not come to the bench as a career prosecutor or criminal-defense attorney; much of his pre-judicial experience came from complex civil litigation, and colleagues have described his approach on the bench as methodical, demanding and decidedly resistant to surprises.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2474bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-judge-hippler-removes-the-gag-order-from-kohberger-case-8-29-26--74735658
The decision marked the end of one of the most contentious transparency battles in the Kohberger case. News organizations, victims’ families and other interested parties had repeatedly challenged the gag order or argued that it restricted too much information from reaching the public, while the defense had consistently emphasized the need to protect Kohberger from prejudicial publicity. Hippler’s order reflected the reality that those competing concerns looked very different after a guilty plea eliminated the need to seat an impartial jury. Lifting the gag order did not automatically unseal every document or make every piece of evidence public, because separate sealing orders and privacy protections could still remain in effect, but it removed the extraordinary speech restrictions that had surrounded the prosecution since its earliest stages. In practical terms, the ruling opened the door for many of the people directly involved in the case to finally discuss their experiences and the investigation without violating the court’s pretrial publicity order.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74735658Sat, 29 Aug 2026 12:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJudge Steven Hippler lifted the gag order in the Bryan Kohberger case after Kohberger pleaded guilty and was sentenced, concluding that the circumstances that originally justified the sweeping restrictions on public statements had fundamentally...
The decision marked the end of one of the most contentious transparency battles in the Kohberger case. News organizations, victims’ families and other interested parties had repeatedly challenged the gag order or argued that it restricted too much information from reaching the public, while the defense had consistently emphasized the need to protect Kohberger from prejudicial publicity. Hippler’s order reflected the reality that those competing concerns looked very different after a guilty plea eliminated the need to seat an impartial jury. Lifting the gag order did not automatically unseal every document or make every piece of evidence public, because separate sealing orders and privacy protections could still remain in effect, but it removed the extraordinary speech restrictions that had surrounded the prosecution since its earliest stages. In practical terms, the ruling opened the door for many of the people directly involved in the case to finally discuss their experiences and the investigation without violating the court’s pretrial publicity order.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2711bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-judge-hippler-and-the-order-on-the-9-11-call-8-29-26--74735657Judge Steven Hippler’s April 24, 2025 order addressed whether the jury would be allowed to hear the 911 call made from the King Road house and see related communications between surviving roommates D.M. and B.F. Prosecutors wanted to introduce the call, the roommates’ text messages and testimony about their conversations, while Kohberger’s defense challenged portions of that material as inadmissible hearsay and objected to allowing jurors to use a transcript while listening to the audio. Hippler largely sided with the prosecution, finding that most of the 911 call and the roommates’ communications were likely admissible if prosecutors laid the proper foundation at trial. He did, however, order several portions of the 911 call redacted because certain statements did not qualify for the hearsay exceptions the state relied upon. Hippler also permitted the prosecution to use a transcript as a demonstrative aid while the jury listened to the approved portions of the recording.

The order was significant because the 911 call captured the chaotic discovery of the crime scene nearly eight hours after D.M. said she had seen a masked intruder inside the house. Among the portions ordered removed was a statement referencing someone having seen a man in the house the night before, while the remaining portions could still be presented to jurors subject to the court’s evidentiary requirements. Hippler’s ruling therefore rejected the defense’s broader effort to keep the call out while still trimming material he believed crossed the hearsay line. The decision also revealed additional detail about the surviving roommates’ actions that morning and showed how the prosecution intended to use the 911 call and contemporaneous messages to reconstruct what happened before police arrived. In practical terms, Hippler allowed the jury to hear most of one of the most anticipated pieces of evidence in the case, but not without carefully controlling which statements could come in.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74735657Sat, 29 Aug 2026 10:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJudge Steven Hippler’s April 24, 2025 order addressed whether the jury would be allowed to hear the 911 call made from the King Road house and see related communications between surviving roommates D.M. and B.F. Prosecutors wanted to introduce the...Judge Steven Hippler’s April 24, 2025 order addressed whether the jury would be allowed to hear the 911 call made from the King Road house and see related communications between surviving roommates D.M. and B.F. Prosecutors wanted to introduce the call, the roommates’ text messages and testimony about their conversations, while Kohberger’s defense challenged portions of that material as inadmissible hearsay and objected to allowing jurors to use a transcript while listening to the audio. Hippler largely sided with the prosecution, finding that most of the 911 call and the roommates’ communications were likely admissible if prosecutors laid the proper foundation at trial. He did, however, order several portions of the 911 call redacted because certain statements did not qualify for the hearsay exceptions the state relied upon. Hippler also permitted the prosecution to use a transcript as a demonstrative aid while the jury listened to the approved portions of the recording.

The order was significant because the 911 call captured the chaotic discovery of the crime scene nearly eight hours after D.M. said she had seen a masked intruder inside the house. Among the portions ordered removed was a statement referencing someone having seen a man in the house the night before, while the remaining portions could still be presented to jurors subject to the court’s evidentiary requirements. Hippler’s ruling therefore rejected the defense’s broader effort to keep the call out while still trimming material he believed crossed the hearsay line. The decision also revealed additional detail about the surviving roommates’ actions that morning and showed how the prosecution intended to use the 911 call and contemporaneous messages to reconstruct what happened before police arrived. In practical terms, Hippler allowed the jury to hear most of one of the most anticipated pieces of evidence in the case, but not without carefully controlling which statements could come in.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2831bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-tova-noel-and-her-place-in-the-epstein-scandal-8-29-26--74735691Tova Noel was one of the two correctional officers assigned to the Special Housing Unit at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in Manhattan on the night Jeffrey Epstein died in August 2019. Along with fellow officer Michael Thomas, Noel was responsible for monitoring Epstein and the other inmates housed on the unit, including conducting required inmate counts and rounds. Federal investigators later charged Noel and Thomas with falsifying prison records after concluding that they had signed logs indicating checks had been completed when, in fact, required rounds had been missed for hours. Noel ultimately avoided trial through a deferred prosecution agreement that required her to cooperate with the Justice Department’s investigation and complete community service, after which the charges were dismissed. She later became an important witness in congressional scrutiny of Epstein’s death because she was among the last people known to have seen him alive, was present when his body was discovered and had firsthand knowledge of the conditions inside the MCC that night.

When Noel finally testified before the House Oversight Committee in May 2026, she largely portrayed herself as an inexperienced, exhausted employee trapped inside a catastrophically understaffed prison rather than someone responsible for Epstein’s death. She said her poor performance resulted from inadequate training, mandatory overtime and the crushing workload at the MCC, telling investigators that she had earned roughly a full year’s base salary in about six months because she was working so much overtime. Noel denied sleeping during the shift, although she acknowledged browsing the internet, and said she could not remember specifically searching for news about Epstein shortly before his body was discovered. She also acknowledged that Epstein received treatment other inmates did not, including extra linens, a CPAP machine and other accommodations, describing exceptions as being made essentially because he was Jeffrey Epstein. Perhaps most strikingly, Noel insisted that her only connection to Epstein’s death was that she happened to be forced into overtime that night, distancing herself from responsibility despite being one of the officers specifically assigned to monitor him and despite admitting that the system around him had broken down. She denied knowing anything about an unidentified orange-colored figure captured on surveillance footage, rejected allegations that she participated in any cover-up and maintained that years of suspicion surrounding her role had devastated her life.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74735691Sat, 29 Aug 2026 08:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciTova Noel was one of the two correctional officers assigned to the Special Housing Unit at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in Manhattan on the night Jeffrey Epstein died in August 2019. Along with fellow officer Michael Thomas, Noel was...Tova Noel was one of the two correctional officers assigned to the Special Housing Unit at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in Manhattan on the night Jeffrey Epstein died in August 2019. Along with fellow officer Michael Thomas, Noel was responsible for monitoring Epstein and the other inmates housed on the unit, including conducting required inmate counts and rounds. Federal investigators later charged Noel and Thomas with falsifying prison records after concluding that they had signed logs indicating checks had been completed when, in fact, required rounds had been missed for hours. Noel ultimately avoided trial through a deferred prosecution agreement that required her to cooperate with the Justice Department’s investigation and complete community service, after which the charges were dismissed. She later became an important witness in congressional scrutiny of Epstein’s death because she was among the last people known to have seen him alive, was present when his body was discovered and had firsthand knowledge of the conditions inside the MCC that night.

When Noel finally testified before the House Oversight Committee in May 2026, she largely portrayed herself as an inexperienced, exhausted employee trapped inside a catastrophically understaffed prison rather than someone responsible for Epstein’s death. She said her poor performance resulted from inadequate training, mandatory overtime and the crushing workload at the MCC, telling investigators that she had earned roughly a full year’s base salary in about six months because she was working so much overtime. Noel denied sleeping during the shift, although she acknowledged browsing the internet, and said she could not remember specifically searching for news about Epstein shortly before his body was discovered. She also acknowledged that Epstein received treatment other inmates did not, including extra linens, a CPAP machine and other accommodations, describing exceptions as being made essentially because he was Jeffrey Epstein. Perhaps most strikingly, Noel insisted that her only connection to Epstein’s death was that she happened to be forced into overtime that night, distancing herself from responsibility despite being one of the officers specifically assigned to monitor him and despite admitting that the system around him had broken down. She denied knowing anything about an unidentified orange-colored figure captured on surveillance footage, rejected allegations that she participated in any cover-up and maintained that years of suspicion surrounding her role had devastated her life.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2933epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-tova-noel-and-her-transcript-from-her-congressional-testimony-part-1-3-8-28-26--74735690
Noel denied having any role in Epstein’s death, receiving money in connection with him or knowing anything about an alleged payment to facilitate access to his cell. She also rejected claims that she was the unidentified orange-colored figure seen moving toward Epstein’s tier at approximately 10:39 p.m., insisting that she never returned to the area and could not explain what—or who—the surveillance image showed. Although Noel said she believed Epstein died by suicide because he was supposedly alone inside the cell, her testimony did little to resolve the most important unanswered questions: why required checks were abandoned, why Epstein remained without a cellmate, who or what appeared near the tier, and how so many security procedures failed simultaneously. Instead, her account reinforced the picture of extraordinary negligence, special treatment and institutional dysfunction surrounding the death of the most consequential prisoner in federal custody.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74735690Sat, 29 Aug 2026 06:30:01 +0000Bobby CapucciTova Noel, one of the two correctional officers assigned to the Metropolitan Correctional Center’s Special Housing Unit on the night Jeffrey Epstein died, told the House Oversight Committee that she failed to conduct the required inmate checks and...
Noel denied having any role in Epstein’s death, receiving money in connection with him or knowing anything about an alleged payment to facilitate access to his cell. She also rejected claims that she was the unidentified orange-colored figure seen moving toward Epstein’s tier at approximately 10:39 p.m., insisting that she never returned to the area and could not explain what—or who—the surveillance image showed. Although Noel said she believed Epstein died by suicide because he was supposedly alone inside the cell, her testimony did little to resolve the most important unanswered questions: why required checks were abandoned, why Epstein remained without a cellmate, who or what appeared near the tier, and how so many security procedures failed simultaneously. Instead, her account reinforced the picture of extraordinary negligence, special treatment and institutional dysfunction surrounding the death of the most consequential prisoner in federal custody.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Tova-Noel-Transcript.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2640epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-judge-hippler-hits-bryan-kohberger-with-another-disastrous-ruling--74735687

The ruling marks another significant setback for Kohberger's legal team, which has made several unsuccessful attempts to derail the state’s pursuit of the death penalty. Kohberger faces four counts of first-degree murder in the brutal November 2022 stabbing deaths of four University of Idaho students. Prosecutors have made clear their intent to seek capital punishment, citing the heinous and calculated nature of the crime.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Idaho murders trial judge's damning one-word response to Bryan Kohberger's bid to dodge the firing squad | Daily Mail Online

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74735687Sat, 29 Aug 2026 04:30:03 +0000Bobby CapucciJudge John Judge of Idaho firmly rejected Bryan Kohberger’s latest legal maneuver to challenge the death penalty, dismissing his claim that Idaho's execution methods—specifically the firing squad—are unconstitutional. Kohberger’s defense argued that...

The ruling marks another significant setback for Kohberger's legal team, which has made several unsuccessful attempts to derail the state’s pursuit of the death penalty. Kohberger faces four counts of first-degree murder in the brutal November 2022 stabbing deaths of four University of Idaho students. Prosecutors have made clear their intent to seek capital punishment, citing the heinous and calculated nature of the crime.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Idaho murders trial judge's damning one-word response to Bryan Kohberger's bid to dodge the firing squad | Daily Mail Online

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1048bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-john-judge-says-allows-cameras-to-remain-with-conditions--74735686Judge John Judge said he would not ban cameras from Bryan Kohberger’s courtroom proceedings, but he made clear that he intended to impose tighter controls over how they were used. Both the prosecution and defense had raised concerns about media coverage, with Kohberger’s attorneys arguing that cameras repeatedly focused on him in ways that could prejudice potential jurors, while prosecutors also supported restrictions in certain circumstances. Judge said he was trying to balance the public’s right to observe the proceedings with Kohberger’s constitutional right to a fair trial, and he warned photographers and media organizations that the courtroom was not a place for spectacle. He specifically objected to cameras focusing excessively on Kohberger, capturing attorneys’ notes or recording during times when the court was not officially on the record.


The ruling reflected the broader tension that surrounded one of the country’s most closely watched murder cases. Judge emphasized that he wanted the case tried in the courtroom rather than in the media, while also recognizing the enormous public interest in the prosecution. Instead of removing cameras entirely, he chose to retain greater control over where they were positioned and what they were permitted to record. That left media access intact for the time being, but under stricter judicial supervision and with a warning that continued misuse could result in further restrictions. The dispute over cameras became another major pretrial battle in the Kohberger case, alongside the gag order, discovery fights and arguments over how much information should reach the public before a jury was ever seated.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74735686Sat, 29 Aug 2026 02:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciJudge John Judge said he would not ban cameras from Bryan Kohberger’s courtroom proceedings, but he made clear that he intended to impose tighter controls over how they were used. Both the prosecution and defense had raised concerns about media...Judge John Judge said he would not ban cameras from Bryan Kohberger’s courtroom proceedings, but he made clear that he intended to impose tighter controls over how they were used. Both the prosecution and defense had raised concerns about media coverage, with Kohberger’s attorneys arguing that cameras repeatedly focused on him in ways that could prejudice potential jurors, while prosecutors also supported restrictions in certain circumstances. Judge said he was trying to balance the public’s right to observe the proceedings with Kohberger’s constitutional right to a fair trial, and he warned photographers and media organizations that the courtroom was not a place for spectacle. He specifically objected to cameras focusing excessively on Kohberger, capturing attorneys’ notes or recording during times when the court was not officially on the record.


The ruling reflected the broader tension that surrounded one of the country’s most closely watched murder cases. Judge emphasized that he wanted the case tried in the courtroom rather than in the media, while also recognizing the enormous public interest in the prosecution. Instead of removing cameras entirely, he chose to retain greater control over where they were positioned and what they were permitted to record. That left media access intact for the time being, but under stricter judicial supervision and with a warning that continued misuse could result in further restrictions. The dispute over cameras became another major pretrial battle in the Kohberger case, alongside the gag order, discovery fights and arguments over how much information should reach the public before a jury was ever seated.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>624bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcripts-day-1-part-10-8-28-26--74735440
The defense spent much of the first day attacking the manner in which the prosecution was getting its evidence into the record rather than attempting to disprove the entire prosecution theory at that stage. Kathryn Nester and Robinson’s attorneys repeatedly raised hearsay, foundation and authentication objections, arguing that investigators were being permitted to introduce reports, statements and records created by other people without those individuals appearing personally to testify. Judge Graf overruled most of those objections, reflecting the substantially lower evidentiary threshold governing a Utah preliminary hearing, whose purpose was only to determine whether probable cause existed to send Robinson to trial rather than whether prosecutors could prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. One significant exception involved an edited compilation of surveillance footage, which Graf declined to admit in that form and required prosecutors to replace with the underlying unedited material. Hull’s testimony also revealed the scope of the prosecution’s surveillance theory: investigators claimed Robinson had appeared on or around the UVU campus multiple times on September 10 and that they were attempting to stitch those appearances together into a continuous identification of the alleged shooter. By the end of day one, prosecutors had established the killing itself, the medical cause of Kirk’s death, the existence and authenticity of substantial video evidence and the beginnings of their effort to identify Robinson as the person captured in that footage. They had not yet presented many of the pieces expected to become more consequential later in the hearing, including the rifle and DNA evidence, Robinson’s alleged communications and admissions, and testimony concerning his roommate Lance Twiggs.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74735440Sat, 29 Aug 2026 00:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay one of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing on July 6, 2026, largely centered on prosecutors beginning to construct a timeline of Charlie Kirk’s killing at Utah Valley University and establishing the authenticity of the surveillance footage and...
The defense spent much of the first day attacking the manner in which the prosecution was getting its evidence into the record rather than attempting to disprove the entire prosecution theory at that stage. Kathryn Nester and Robinson’s attorneys repeatedly raised hearsay, foundation and authentication objections, arguing that investigators were being permitted to introduce reports, statements and records created by other people without those individuals appearing personally to testify. Judge Graf overruled most of those objections, reflecting the substantially lower evidentiary threshold governing a Utah preliminary hearing, whose purpose was only to determine whether probable cause existed to send Robinson to trial rather than whether prosecutors could prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. One significant exception involved an edited compilation of surveillance footage, which Graf declined to admit in that form and required prosecutors to replace with the underlying unedited material. Hull’s testimony also revealed the scope of the prosecution’s surveillance theory: investigators claimed Robinson had appeared on or around the UVU campus multiple times on September 10 and that they were attempting to stitch those appearances together into a continuous identification of the alleged shooter. By the end of day one, prosecutors had established the killing itself, the medical cause of Kirk’s death, the existence and authenticity of substantial video evidence and the beginnings of their effort to identify Robinson as the person captured in that footage. They had not yet presented many of the pieces expected to become more consequential later in the hearing, including the rifle and DNA evidence, Robinson’s alleged communications and admissions, and testimony concerning his roommate Lance Twiggs.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>796breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/what-jes-staley-told-congress-about-jeffrey-epstein-s-assistant-8-27-26--74723110
Investigators also confronted Staley with some of the more disturbing and suggestive correspondence contained in the released Epstein material. In July 2010, Staley had written to Epstein, “Say hi to Snow White,” prompting Epstein to ask what character Staley wanted next, to which Staley replied, “Beauty and the Beast.” Another message sent to Epstein around the same time referenced a woman in a Snow White costume having sex shortly after putting it on, and investigators showed Staley a photograph Epstein had circulated of a young woman dressed as the Disney character. Staley maintained that he did not remember seeing a woman dressed as Snow White at Epstein’s residence, denied having sex with anyone wearing such a costume and said he did not recognize the woman in the photograph. His testimony therefore added another uncomfortable layer to the long-running scrutiny of his relationship with Epstein: Staley acknowledged becoming sexually involved with a woman he met inside Epstein’s orbit while simultaneously denying that Epstein facilitated the encounter or that he understood what was happening to women around Epstein.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonnail.com



source:


Ex-Barclays chief Jes Staley details his ‘intimate encounter’ with Jeffrey Epstein’s assistant  to House investigators





Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74723110Fri, 28 Aug 2026 22:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciFormer Barclays chief Jes Staley told House Oversight Committee investigators that he had a sexual encounter with one of Jeffrey Epstein’s assistants after meeting her through Epstein. Staley said he first met the unnamed woman at Epstein’s Manhattan...
Investigators also confronted Staley with some of the more disturbing and suggestive correspondence contained in the released Epstein material. In July 2010, Staley had written to Epstein, “Say hi to Snow White,” prompting Epstein to ask what character Staley wanted next, to which Staley replied, “Beauty and the Beast.” Another message sent to Epstein around the same time referenced a woman in a Snow White costume having sex shortly after putting it on, and investigators showed Staley a photograph Epstein had circulated of a young woman dressed as the Disney character. Staley maintained that he did not remember seeing a woman dressed as Snow White at Epstein’s residence, denied having sex with anyone wearing such a costume and said he did not recognize the woman in the photograph. His testimony therefore added another uncomfortable layer to the long-running scrutiny of his relationship with Epstein: Staley acknowledged becoming sexually involved with a woman he met inside Epstein’s orbit while simultaneously denying that Epstein facilitated the encounter or that he understood what was happening to women around Epstein.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonnail.com



source:


Ex-Barclays chief Jes Staley details his ‘intimate encounter’ with Jeffrey Epstein’s assistant  to House investigators





Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>671epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/bill-clinton-and-the-transcript-from-his-epstein-related-interview-with-congress-part-8-8-28-26--74723111Bill Clinton’s February 27, 2026 testimony before the House Oversight Committee finally forced him to answer under oath about a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that had generated questions for decades, but the proceeding hardly delivered the kind of exhaustive accounting the public had been promised. Clinton insisted that he had “done nothing wrong,” knew nothing about Epstein’s abuse and never witnessed anything that caused him concern, effectively asking lawmakers to accept that his repeated contact with Epstein, travel aboard Epstein’s aircraft and proximity to Ghislaine Maxwell never exposed him to anything suspicious. That explanation deserved considerably more scrutiny than it received. Clinton had not volunteered for the deposition either. He resisted the committee’s subpoena, failed to appear for a scheduled January 13 deposition and only agreed to testify after a bipartisan contempt resolution advanced against him. Yet when he finally appeared, even some lawmakers who had spent months demanding answers quickly described him as cooperative and candid. The central problem remained unresolved: Clinton’s defense depended heavily on what he claimed not to have seen, not to have known and not to remember, while the documentary record established that his association with Epstein was substantial enough to demand far more than a polite acceptance of those denials.

The congressional process itself also exposed the weaknesses that have plagued nearly every official examination of Epstein’s network. Rather than methodically reconstructing Clinton’s relationship with Epstein against flight records, photographs, visitor records, witness accounts and contemporaneous communications, the deposition became entangled in the same partisan warfare that repeatedly consumes the Epstein investigation. Republicans emphasized Clinton while Democrats complained that Donald Trump had not been subpoenaed, and Chairman James Comer immediately used Clinton’s answers to make political claims about Trump rather than keeping the focus exclusively on Epstein and the unanswered questions surrounding Clinton himself. Clinton’s testimony therefore produced another familiar outcome: a powerful person denied knowledge of Epstein’s crimes, lawmakers divided themselves into political camps, and very little was done to independently test how plausible those denials actually were. Clinton’s appearance was historically significant because Congress compelled a former president to testify, but significance should not be confused with accountability. After years of questions about one of the most prominent men in Epstein’s orbit, the public was still largely left with Clinton’s version of events and a congressional process that appeared more interested in scoring partisan points than aggressively determining whether that version could withstand sustained scrutiny.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74723111Fri, 28 Aug 2026 20:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBill Clinton’s February 27, 2026 testimony before the House Oversight Committee finally forced him to answer under oath about a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that had generated questions for decades, but the proceeding hardly delivered the kind of...Bill Clinton’s February 27, 2026 testimony before the House Oversight Committee finally forced him to answer under oath about a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that had generated questions for decades, but the proceeding hardly delivered the kind of exhaustive accounting the public had been promised. Clinton insisted that he had “done nothing wrong,” knew nothing about Epstein’s abuse and never witnessed anything that caused him concern, effectively asking lawmakers to accept that his repeated contact with Epstein, travel aboard Epstein’s aircraft and proximity to Ghislaine Maxwell never exposed him to anything suspicious. That explanation deserved considerably more scrutiny than it received. Clinton had not volunteered for the deposition either. He resisted the committee’s subpoena, failed to appear for a scheduled January 13 deposition and only agreed to testify after a bipartisan contempt resolution advanced against him. Yet when he finally appeared, even some lawmakers who had spent months demanding answers quickly described him as cooperative and candid. The central problem remained unresolved: Clinton’s defense depended heavily on what he claimed not to have seen, not to have known and not to remember, while the documentary record established that his association with Epstein was substantial enough to demand far more than a polite acceptance of those denials.

The congressional process itself also exposed the weaknesses that have plagued nearly every official examination of Epstein’s network. Rather than methodically reconstructing Clinton’s relationship with Epstein against flight records, photographs, visitor records, witness accounts and contemporaneous communications, the deposition became entangled in the same partisan warfare that repeatedly consumes the Epstein investigation. Republicans emphasized Clinton while Democrats complained that Donald Trump had not been subpoenaed, and Chairman James Comer immediately used Clinton’s answers to make political claims about Trump rather than keeping the focus exclusively on Epstein and the unanswered questions surrounding Clinton himself. Clinton’s testimony therefore produced another familiar outcome: a powerful person denied knowledge of Epstein’s crimes, lawmakers divided themselves into political camps, and very little was done to independently test how plausible those denials actually were. Clinton’s appearance was historically significant because Congress compelled a former president to testify, but significance should not be confused with accountability. After years of questions about one of the most prominent men in Epstein’s orbit, the public was still largely left with Clinton’s version of events and a congressional process that appeared more interested in scoring partisan points than aggressively determining whether that version could withstand sustained scrutiny.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>948epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/bill-clinton-and-the-transcript-from-his-epstein-related-interview-with-congress-part-7-8-28-26--74723108Bill Clinton’s February 27, 2026 testimony before the House Oversight Committee finally forced him to answer under oath about a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that had generated questions for decades, but the proceeding hardly delivered the kind of exhaustive accounting the public had been promised. Clinton insisted that he had “done nothing wrong,” knew nothing about Epstein’s abuse and never witnessed anything that caused him concern, effectively asking lawmakers to accept that his repeated contact with Epstein, travel aboard Epstein’s aircraft and proximity to Ghislaine Maxwell never exposed him to anything suspicious. That explanation deserved considerably more scrutiny than it received. Clinton had not volunteered for the deposition either. He resisted the committee’s subpoena, failed to appear for a scheduled January 13 deposition and only agreed to testify after a bipartisan contempt resolution advanced against him. Yet when he finally appeared, even some lawmakers who had spent months demanding answers quickly described him as cooperative and candid. The central problem remained unresolved: Clinton’s defense depended heavily on what he claimed not to have seen, not to have known and not to remember, while the documentary record established that his association with Epstein was substantial enough to demand far more than a polite acceptance of those denials.

The congressional process itself also exposed the weaknesses that have plagued nearly every official examination of Epstein’s network. Rather than methodically reconstructing Clinton’s relationship with Epstein against flight records, photographs, visitor records, witness accounts and contemporaneous communications, the deposition became entangled in the same partisan warfare that repeatedly consumes the Epstein investigation. Republicans emphasized Clinton while Democrats complained that Donald Trump had not been subpoenaed, and Chairman James Comer immediately used Clinton’s answers to make political claims about Trump rather than keeping the focus exclusively on Epstein and the unanswered questions surrounding Clinton himself. Clinton’s testimony therefore produced another familiar outcome: a powerful person denied knowledge of Epstein’s crimes, lawmakers divided themselves into political camps, and very little was done to independently test how plausible those denials actually were. Clinton’s appearance was historically significant because Congress compelled a former president to testify, but significance should not be confused with accountability. After years of questions about one of the most prominent men in Epstein’s orbit, the public was still largely left with Clinton’s version of events and a congressional process that appeared more interested in scoring partisan points than aggressively determining whether that version could withstand sustained scrutiny.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74723108Fri, 28 Aug 2026 18:30:04 +0000Bobby CapucciBill Clinton’s February 27, 2026 testimony before the House Oversight Committee finally forced him to answer under oath about a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that had generated questions for decades, but the proceeding hardly delivered the kind of...Bill Clinton’s February 27, 2026 testimony before the House Oversight Committee finally forced him to answer under oath about a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that had generated questions for decades, but the proceeding hardly delivered the kind of exhaustive accounting the public had been promised. Clinton insisted that he had “done nothing wrong,” knew nothing about Epstein’s abuse and never witnessed anything that caused him concern, effectively asking lawmakers to accept that his repeated contact with Epstein, travel aboard Epstein’s aircraft and proximity to Ghislaine Maxwell never exposed him to anything suspicious. That explanation deserved considerably more scrutiny than it received. Clinton had not volunteered for the deposition either. He resisted the committee’s subpoena, failed to appear for a scheduled January 13 deposition and only agreed to testify after a bipartisan contempt resolution advanced against him. Yet when he finally appeared, even some lawmakers who had spent months demanding answers quickly described him as cooperative and candid. The central problem remained unresolved: Clinton’s defense depended heavily on what he claimed not to have seen, not to have known and not to remember, while the documentary record established that his association with Epstein was substantial enough to demand far more than a polite acceptance of those denials.

The congressional process itself also exposed the weaknesses that have plagued nearly every official examination of Epstein’s network. Rather than methodically reconstructing Clinton’s relationship with Epstein against flight records, photographs, visitor records, witness accounts and contemporaneous communications, the deposition became entangled in the same partisan warfare that repeatedly consumes the Epstein investigation. Republicans emphasized Clinton while Democrats complained that Donald Trump had not been subpoenaed, and Chairman James Comer immediately used Clinton’s answers to make political claims about Trump rather than keeping the focus exclusively on Epstein and the unanswered questions surrounding Clinton himself. Clinton’s testimony therefore produced another familiar outcome: a powerful person denied knowledge of Epstein’s crimes, lawmakers divided themselves into political camps, and very little was done to independently test how plausible those denials actually were. Clinton’s appearance was historically significant because Congress compelled a former president to testify, but significance should not be confused with accountability. After years of questions about one of the most prominent men in Epstein’s orbit, the public was still largely left with Clinton’s version of events and a congressional process that appeared more interested in scoring partisan points than aggressively determining whether that version could withstand sustained scrutiny.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>766epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-the-experts-behind-the-case-against-bryan-kohberger-part-7-8-28-26--74735434
Sutton’s role became especially important because the defense retained its own crime-scene reconstruction experts, including Matthew Noedel and Dr. Brent Turvey, who challenged portions of the prosecution’s interpretation of the physical evidence. Her revised report therefore did more than simply describe the blood evidence; it also responded to those competing defense theories and explained why she believed certain features of the scene supported her conclusions. Had Kohberger’s case gone to trial, Sutton was expected to help prosecutors walk jurors through the bloodstain evidence and explain what it suggested about movement, contact and activity inside the house during and after the attacks. In that sense, she would have been one of the State’s key witnesses for translating the chaotic physical scene into a forensic reconstruction of how prosecutors believed the murders unfolded.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source: 

030326+REDACTED+Exhibits+S-1+through+S-13+to+States+Amended+Supp+Resp+to+Rqst+for+Disc+RE+Expert+Testimony.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74735434Fri, 28 Aug 2026 16:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciPaulette Sutton was one of the prosecution’s forensic experts in the case against Bryan Kohberger, and her specialty was crime-scene reconstruction and bloodstain-pattern analysis. Sutton reviewed the blood evidence documented inside 1122 King Road,...
Sutton’s role became especially important because the defense retained its own crime-scene reconstruction experts, including Matthew Noedel and Dr. Brent Turvey, who challenged portions of the prosecution’s interpretation of the physical evidence. Her revised report therefore did more than simply describe the blood evidence; it also responded to those competing defense theories and explained why she believed certain features of the scene supported her conclusions. Had Kohberger’s case gone to trial, Sutton was expected to help prosecutors walk jurors through the bloodstain evidence and explain what it suggested about movement, contact and activity inside the house during and after the attacks. In that sense, she would have been one of the State’s key witnesses for translating the chaotic physical scene into a forensic reconstruction of how prosecutors believed the murders unfolded.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source: 

030326+REDACTED+Exhibits+S-1+through+S-13+to+States+Amended+Supp+Resp+to+Rqst+for+Disc+RE+Expert+Testimony.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>706bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/anderson-cooper-presses-bill-gates-on-epstein-s-alleged-blackmail-attempt-8-28-26--74723109
Gates also defended the account he had given House Oversight Committee investigators during a closed-door interview in June 2026, saying he had gone through his meetings and communications with Epstein in detail. He said he had not maintained a social relationship with Epstein, had never met women through him and had never visited Epstein’s island, New Mexico ranch or Florida residence. Gates repeated that he had associated with Epstein because he believed Epstein could connect wealthy donors with global-health philanthropy, a judgment he now called a “gigantic mistake.” In his congressional statement, however, Gates acknowledged that Epstein eventually learned sensitive information about his infidelities and attempted to leverage it to draw him back into contact after Gates disengaged. Gates said the effort failed, but the episode added a more troubling dimension to questions about why he continued meeting with Epstein years after Epstein’s 2008 conviction and what Epstein hoped to gain from cultivating a relationship with one of the world’s most powerful businessmen.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74723109Fri, 28 Aug 2026 14:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBill Gates was pressed by CNN’s Anderson Cooper about allegations that Jeffrey Epstein had attempted to use sensitive information about Gates’ personal life to pressure him after their relationship deteriorated. During an appearance on Anderson Cooper...
Gates also defended the account he had given House Oversight Committee investigators during a closed-door interview in June 2026, saying he had gone through his meetings and communications with Epstein in detail. He said he had not maintained a social relationship with Epstein, had never met women through him and had never visited Epstein’s island, New Mexico ranch or Florida residence. Gates repeated that he had associated with Epstein because he believed Epstein could connect wealthy donors with global-health philanthropy, a judgment he now called a “gigantic mistake.” In his congressional statement, however, Gates acknowledged that Epstein eventually learned sensitive information about his infidelities and attempted to leverage it to draw him back into contact after Gates disengaged. Gates said the effort failed, but the episode added a more troubling dimension to questions about why he continued meeting with Epstein years after Epstein’s 2008 conviction and what Epstein hoped to gain from cultivating a relationship with one of the world’s most powerful businessmen.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>901bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/les-wexner-s-ohio-state-exit-and-the-investigation-into-epstein-linked-doctors-8-27-26--74702132
At the same time, New York health officials said they were reviewing disturbing allegations involving physicians who had relationships with Epstein, adding another layer of scrutiny to the professional networks that surrounded him. The New York State Department of Health described allegations raised in recent reporting as “deeply troubling” and said they warranted examination, though a review is not itself proof that any doctor committed misconduct. Released records have documented Epstein’s relationships with multiple physicians and researchers, including doctors affiliated with Weill Cornell Medicine, where correspondence and social contacts with Epstein extended well beyond purely medical matters. The development has intensified questions about how Epstein maintained access to prestigious medical, scientific and academic circles even after his 2008 conviction, and whether institutions adequately examined those relationships at the time. Taken together with Wexner’s retreat from a prominent Ohio State leadership position, the developments showed how the continuing release and examination of Epstein-related material was producing consequences far beyond the criminal cases against Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, forcing universities, medical institutions and regulators to revisit relationships that had gone largely unchallenged for years.



to contact me;


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

Les Wexner stepping down as chair of Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Board • Ohio Capital Journal


Doctors Linked To Jeffrey Epstein Being Investigated By New York Department of Health

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74702132Fri, 28 Aug 2026 12:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciLes Wexner stepped down as chairman of the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Board amid renewed scrutiny surrounding his decades-old relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, although he did not completely sever his ties with the institution....
At the same time, New York health officials said they were reviewing disturbing allegations involving physicians who had relationships with Epstein, adding another layer of scrutiny to the professional networks that surrounded him. The New York State Department of Health described allegations raised in recent reporting as “deeply troubling” and said they warranted examination, though a review is not itself proof that any doctor committed misconduct. Released records have documented Epstein’s relationships with multiple physicians and researchers, including doctors affiliated with Weill Cornell Medicine, where correspondence and social contacts with Epstein extended well beyond purely medical matters. The development has intensified questions about how Epstein maintained access to prestigious medical, scientific and academic circles even after his 2008 conviction, and whether institutions adequately examined those relationships at the time. Taken together with Wexner’s retreat from a prominent Ohio State leadership position, the developments showed how the continuing release and examination of Epstein-related material was producing consequences far beyond the criminal cases against Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, forcing universities, medical institutions and regulators to revisit relationships that had gone largely unchallenged for years.



to contact me;


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

Les Wexner stepping down as chair of Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Board • Ohio Capital Journal


Doctors Linked To Jeffrey Epstein Being Investigated By New York Department of Health

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>670epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-starry-skies-and-alibis-featuring-bryan-kohberger-8-28-26--74719500Bryan Kohberger’s defense said that during the early morning hours of November 13, 2022, when Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin were killed, Kohberger had been alone in his car driving through the countryside south and west of Moscow rather than inside the King Road house. His attorneys described nighttime driving as something Kohberger regularly did and said he often traveled to remote areas to hike, run or look at the moon and stars. The supplemental alibi filing identified cell-site expert Sy Ray as a witness who could partially corroborate that account by analyzing Kohberger’s phone data and attempting to show that he had been traveling away from Moscow during portions of the night. The defense did not claim that another person had been physically with Kohberger and could verify his whereabouts, instead relying largely on his driving habits and anticipated expert analysis of digital location evidence.

Prosecutors reacted by arguing that the so-called alibi was not really an alibi at all because it failed to establish where Kohberger had been during the critical window when the murders occurred. The state emphasized that Kohberger’s phone had stopped reporting to the cellular network before the homicides and did not reconnect until afterward, meaning the very period in which he most needed location data was the period for which the phone provided none. Prosecutors also argued that saying Kohberger had been somewhere south and west of Moscow looking at the night sky was too vague to satisfy Idaho’s alibi requirements, which called for specific locations and information identifying witnesses who could verify the defendant was somewhere else when the crime occurred. The state therefore asked the court to restrict or exclude the proposed alibi evidence, arguing that Ray’s anticipated testimony might describe Kohberger’s movements before or after the murders but could not establish that he had been somewhere else at the precise time the four students were killed.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74719500Fri, 28 Aug 2026 10:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBryan Kohberger’s defense said that during the early morning hours of November 13, 2022, when Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin were killed, Kohberger had been alone in his car driving through the countryside south and...Bryan Kohberger’s defense said that during the early morning hours of November 13, 2022, when Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin were killed, Kohberger had been alone in his car driving through the countryside south and west of Moscow rather than inside the King Road house. His attorneys described nighttime driving as something Kohberger regularly did and said he often traveled to remote areas to hike, run or look at the moon and stars. The supplemental alibi filing identified cell-site expert Sy Ray as a witness who could partially corroborate that account by analyzing Kohberger’s phone data and attempting to show that he had been traveling away from Moscow during portions of the night. The defense did not claim that another person had been physically with Kohberger and could verify his whereabouts, instead relying largely on his driving habits and anticipated expert analysis of digital location evidence.

Prosecutors reacted by arguing that the so-called alibi was not really an alibi at all because it failed to establish where Kohberger had been during the critical window when the murders occurred. The state emphasized that Kohberger’s phone had stopped reporting to the cellular network before the homicides and did not reconnect until afterward, meaning the very period in which he most needed location data was the period for which the phone provided none. Prosecutors also argued that saying Kohberger had been somewhere south and west of Moscow looking at the night sky was too vague to satisfy Idaho’s alibi requirements, which called for specific locations and information identifying witnesses who could verify the defendant was somewhere else when the crime occurred. The state therefore asked the court to restrict or exclude the proposed alibi evidence, arguing that Ray’s anticipated testimony might describe Kohberger’s movements before or after the murders but could not establish that he had been somewhere else at the precise time the four students were killed.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2237bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-his-experts-in-dna-and-digital-evidence-8-28-26--74719499Bryan Kohberger’s defense team assembled a wide-ranging group of experts as it prepared for trial, signaling that it intended to challenge the prosecution on virtually every major category of evidence. The defense brought in specialists in DNA, genetic genealogy, digital forensics, cellular data, crime-scene analysis, bloodstain interpretation, pathology and other technical fields that could bear on the state’s case. DNA experts were particularly important because prosecutors had relied heavily on genetic evidence connected to the knife sheath recovered at the King Road house, while specialists in investigative genetic genealogy were positioned to scrutinize how authorities identified Kohberger through family-tree research. Digital-evidence experts were also expected to examine cellphone records, location data, computer evidence, online activity and other electronic material that prosecutors intended to use to reconstruct Kohberger’s movements and behavior before and after the murders.


The unusually large expert roster reflected the defense strategy of attacking the case piece by piece rather than allowing the prosecution’s evidence to be presented as a seamless narrative. Cell-site and geolocation specialists could challenge claims about where Kohberger’s phone had been, forensic experts could question how physical evidence was collected and interpreted, and DNA specialists could probe the reliability, handling and statistical significance of the genetic evidence. The defense also retained experts capable of reviewing surveillance footage, vehicle identification and other digital or visual evidence tied to the white Hyundai Elantra that investigators associated with the crime. Taken together, the expert disclosures showed that Kohberger’s attorneys were preparing for a highly technical trial in which they planned to contest not only what the evidence appeared to show, but also the scientific methods, assumptions and investigative procedures used to produce those conclusions.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74719499Fri, 28 Aug 2026 08:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBryan Kohberger’s defense team assembled a wide-ranging group of experts as it prepared for trial, signaling that it intended to challenge the prosecution on virtually every major category of evidence. The defense brought in specialists in DNA,...Bryan Kohberger’s defense team assembled a wide-ranging group of experts as it prepared for trial, signaling that it intended to challenge the prosecution on virtually every major category of evidence. The defense brought in specialists in DNA, genetic genealogy, digital forensics, cellular data, crime-scene analysis, bloodstain interpretation, pathology and other technical fields that could bear on the state’s case. DNA experts were particularly important because prosecutors had relied heavily on genetic evidence connected to the knife sheath recovered at the King Road house, while specialists in investigative genetic genealogy were positioned to scrutinize how authorities identified Kohberger through family-tree research. Digital-evidence experts were also expected to examine cellphone records, location data, computer evidence, online activity and other electronic material that prosecutors intended to use to reconstruct Kohberger’s movements and behavior before and after the murders.


The unusually large expert roster reflected the defense strategy of attacking the case piece by piece rather than allowing the prosecution’s evidence to be presented as a seamless narrative. Cell-site and geolocation specialists could challenge claims about where Kohberger’s phone had been, forensic experts could question how physical evidence was collected and interpreted, and DNA specialists could probe the reliability, handling and statistical significance of the genetic evidence. The defense also retained experts capable of reviewing surveillance footage, vehicle identification and other digital or visual evidence tied to the white Hyundai Elantra that investigators associated with the crime. Taken together, the expert disclosures showed that Kohberger’s attorneys were preparing for a highly technical trial in which they planned to contest not only what the evidence appeared to show, but also the scientific methods, assumptions and investigative procedures used to produce those conclusions.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2622bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-state-of-idaho-and-it-s-history-with-the-death-penalty-8-28-26--74719498Idaho’s death penalty had a long history stretching back to the territorial era, with capital punishment established there in 1864, decades before statehood. Executions were originally carried out at the county level and were sometimes public, before the state centralized them at the penitentiary in 1901; Idaho’s final hanging took place in 1957. Like the rest of the country, Idaho’s capital punishment system was disrupted after the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1972 decision in Furman v. Georgia, but lawmakers reinstated the death penalty under a revised statute the following year. In the modern era, Idaho has used lethal injection and has carried out only a small number of executions since capital punishment resumed nationally in the 1970s. More recently, the state moved aggressively to preserve its ability to execute prisoners when lethal-injection drugs became difficult to obtain, authorizing the firing squad as an alternative in 2023 and later making it the primary method of execution effective July 1, 2026. That history made Idaho one of the states that not only retained the death penalty but continued expanding the mechanisms available to carry it out.

Bryan Kohberger became part of that history when prosecutors announced they would seek the death penalty for the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. For more than two years, the possibility of execution shaped nearly every major strategic battle in the case, including fights over aggravating factors, expert testimony, discovery, mitigation evidence and repeated defense efforts to have the death penalty removed. Kohberger’s case also unfolded while Idaho was strengthening its execution laws, making the firing squad a particularly striking backdrop to a prosecution already carrying enormous public attention. Ultimately, however, Kohberger never reached a capital trial. In June 2025, prosecutors agreed to take the death penalty off the table in exchange for guilty pleas to four counts of first-degree murder and one count of burglary, and he was sentenced the following month to four consecutive life terms without parole. That resolution placed Kohberger in an unusual position within Idaho’s death-penalty story: he spent years facing the possibility of becoming one of the state’s most notorious condemned prisoners, only for the capital case to disappear through a plea agreement just before trial.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74719498Fri, 28 Aug 2026 06:30:01 +0000Bobby CapucciIdaho’s death penalty had a long history stretching back to the territorial era, with capital punishment established there in 1864, decades before statehood. Executions were originally carried out at the county level and were sometimes public, before...Idaho’s death penalty had a long history stretching back to the territorial era, with capital punishment established there in 1864, decades before statehood. Executions were originally carried out at the county level and were sometimes public, before the state centralized them at the penitentiary in 1901; Idaho’s final hanging took place in 1957. Like the rest of the country, Idaho’s capital punishment system was disrupted after the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1972 decision in Furman v. Georgia, but lawmakers reinstated the death penalty under a revised statute the following year. In the modern era, Idaho has used lethal injection and has carried out only a small number of executions since capital punishment resumed nationally in the 1970s. More recently, the state moved aggressively to preserve its ability to execute prisoners when lethal-injection drugs became difficult to obtain, authorizing the firing squad as an alternative in 2023 and later making it the primary method of execution effective July 1, 2026. That history made Idaho one of the states that not only retained the death penalty but continued expanding the mechanisms available to carry it out.

Bryan Kohberger became part of that history when prosecutors announced they would seek the death penalty for the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. For more than two years, the possibility of execution shaped nearly every major strategic battle in the case, including fights over aggravating factors, expert testimony, discovery, mitigation evidence and repeated defense efforts to have the death penalty removed. Kohberger’s case also unfolded while Idaho was strengthening its execution laws, making the firing squad a particularly striking backdrop to a prosecution already carrying enormous public attention. Ultimately, however, Kohberger never reached a capital trial. In June 2025, prosecutors agreed to take the death penalty off the table in exchange for guilty pleas to four counts of first-degree murder and one count of burglary, and he was sentenced the following month to four consecutive life terms without parole. That resolution placed Kohberger in an unusual position within Idaho’s death-penalty story: he spent years facing the possibility of becoming one of the state’s most notorious condemned prisoners, only for the capital case to disappear through a plea agreement just before trial.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2259falsefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-the-unexplained-gap-in-the-timeline-of-the-murders--74718573

At that stage, the unexplained period was one of several major holes investigators were attempting to fill as they built a minute-by-minute picture of the victims’ final night. Police had not publicly identified a suspect, the murder weapon had not been recovered, and investigators were still collecting surveillance footage, digital evidence and tips from people who had been in the area. The four-hour gap did not mean police believed Kernodle or Chapin had necessarily encountered the killer during that period; rather, investigators were trying to eliminate uncertainty and determine whether anything that happened earlier in the evening could have been connected to what occurred later at the King Road residence. The unanswered timeline became another example of how incomplete the public picture remained during the first weeks of the investigation, when authorities were still assembling basic facts that would later be viewed very differently once Bryan Kohberger was arrested and the probable-cause evidence became public.


to ocntact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/idaho-police-puzzled-by-four-hour-gap-in-timeline-of-murder-victims/ar-AA14XYAG?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=26522fcce5e548dda528f0a0f2b2df0b

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74718573Fri, 28 Aug 2026 04:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciEarly in the investigation into the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, Moscow police were still trying to account for a significant gap in the victims’ movements on the night of November 12 and early morning of...

At that stage, the unexplained period was one of several major holes investigators were attempting to fill as they built a minute-by-minute picture of the victims’ final night. Police had not publicly identified a suspect, the murder weapon had not been recovered, and investigators were still collecting surveillance footage, digital evidence and tips from people who had been in the area. The four-hour gap did not mean police believed Kernodle or Chapin had necessarily encountered the killer during that period; rather, investigators were trying to eliminate uncertainty and determine whether anything that happened earlier in the evening could have been connected to what occurred later at the King Road residence. The unanswered timeline became another example of how incomplete the public picture remained during the first weeks of the investigation, when authorities were still assembling basic facts that would later be viewed very differently once Bryan Kohberger was arrested and the probable-cause evidence became public.


to ocntact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/idaho-police-puzzled-by-four-hour-gap-in-timeline-of-murder-victims/ar-AA14XYAG?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=26522fcce5e548dda528f0a0f2b2df0b

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>730bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/moscow-murders-four-university-of-idaho-students-are-murdered--74718572
That was the environment in which our coverage of the case began: before Bryan Kohberger’s name entered the public conversation, before the white Hyundai Elantra became a centerpiece of the investigation, before the DNA evidence, cellphone records, surviving-roommate accounts and enormous volume of court litigation that would eventually define the case. In those first reports, the story was simply an inexplicable quadruple homicide involving four young people who had been together with friends only hours before their deaths. The early speculation about a burglary gone wrong or a crime of passion demonstrated just how little was actually known and how dramatically the understanding of the case would evolve in the weeks and years that followed. Looking back at that initial reporting now provides a useful snapshot of where this investigation started: four victims, a house full of unanswered questions, an unknown killer and a community trying to understand how something so violent could have happened in the middle of a quiet college town.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11430199/Four-University-Idaho-students-killed-burglary-gone-wrong-mayor-says.html

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74718572Fri, 28 Aug 2026 02:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciWhen we first began covering the University of Idaho murders in November 2022, the case was still almost completely undefined. Four students — Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin — had been found dead inside an off-campus...
That was the environment in which our coverage of the case began: before Bryan Kohberger’s name entered the public conversation, before the white Hyundai Elantra became a centerpiece of the investigation, before the DNA evidence, cellphone records, surviving-roommate accounts and enormous volume of court litigation that would eventually define the case. In those first reports, the story was simply an inexplicable quadruple homicide involving four young people who had been together with friends only hours before their deaths. The early speculation about a burglary gone wrong or a crime of passion demonstrated just how little was actually known and how dramatically the understanding of the case would evolve in the weeks and years that followed. Looking back at that initial reporting now provides a useful snapshot of where this investigation started: four victims, a house full of unanswered questions, an unknown killer and a community trying to understand how something so violent could have happened in the middle of a quiet college town.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11430199/Four-University-Idaho-students-killed-burglary-gone-wrong-mayor-says.html

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>771bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-s-motion-opposing-electronic-media-coverage-8-27-26--74718542
The filing also builds on the defense’s broader argument that extensive media exposure is making it increasingly difficult to preserve an impartial jury pool in a case that has attracted enormous national attention. Robinson’s attorneys say witnesses whose statements were admitted as reliable hearsay during the preliminary-hearing process have already faced harassment from media organizations and interested third parties, which they offer as another example of the consequences of unrestricted exposure. Their concern is particularly acute because the September 1 proceeding is not a trial but an oral argument over whether prosecutors have established enough probable cause to bind Robinson over for trial, meaning the public could hear extensive discussion of evidence without the protections and evidentiary restrictions that would apply before a jury. The defense therefore asks Graf to treat the proceeding as a judicial hearing rather than a media event and to prohibit cameras from broadcasting arguments that could become part of the permanent public narrative even if portions of the underlying evidence are later excluded. The request continues a months-long fight over courtroom access, publicity and the balance between transparency and Robinson’s constitutional right to receive a fair trial before an impartial jury.












to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Accused Charlie Kirk assassin Tyler Robinson's lawyers seek camera ban | Fox News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74718542Fri, 28 Aug 2026 00:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciTyler Robinson’s defense team is asking Judge Tony Graf to block electronic media coverage of the September 1 hearing, arguing that allowing cameras and livestreaming would create an unnecessary risk to Robinson’s right to a fair trial. The lawyers...
The filing also builds on the defense’s broader argument that extensive media exposure is making it increasingly difficult to preserve an impartial jury pool in a case that has attracted enormous national attention. Robinson’s attorneys say witnesses whose statements were admitted as reliable hearsay during the preliminary-hearing process have already faced harassment from media organizations and interested third parties, which they offer as another example of the consequences of unrestricted exposure. Their concern is particularly acute because the September 1 proceeding is not a trial but an oral argument over whether prosecutors have established enough probable cause to bind Robinson over for trial, meaning the public could hear extensive discussion of evidence without the protections and evidentiary restrictions that would apply before a jury. The defense therefore asks Graf to treat the proceeding as a judicial hearing rather than a media event and to prohibit cameras from broadcasting arguments that could become part of the permanent public narrative even if portions of the underlying evidence are later excluded. The request continues a months-long fight over courtroom access, publicity and the balance between transparency and Robinson’s constitutional right to receive a fair trial before an impartial jury.












to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Accused Charlie Kirk assassin Tyler Robinson's lawyers seek camera ban | Fox News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>454breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-s-lawyers-seek-camera-ban-ahead-of-september-1st-hearing-8-27-26--74702136
The September 1 hearing was set to be an important step in determining whether Robinson would be ordered to stand trial for the killing of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University in September 2025. Judge Graf was expected to hear arguments about the evidence introduced during the July preliminary hearing and decide whether prosecutors had established probable cause to move the case forward. Robinson’s lawyers were also challenging the prosecution’s use of hearsay and disputing the aggravating factor that could make the case eligible for the death penalty, specifically the allegation that Robinson endangered numerous people by firing into a crowded area. Prosecutors countered that Robinson had demonstrated poor shooting accuracy in practice and therefore created a substantial risk to bystanders, while the defense emphasized that only one shot was fired and that it struck Kirk alone. Robinson had not yet entered a plea, making the upcoming hearing another major battleground over both the evidence against him and how much of the case the public should be allowed to watch in real time.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Accused Charlie Kirk assassin Tyler Robinson's lawyers seek camera ban | Fox News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74702136Thu, 27 Aug 2026 22:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciTyler Robinson’s defense attorneys asked Judge Tony Graf Jr. to ban cameras and livestreaming from the September 1 hearing, arguing that continued electronic coverage risked turning the proceedings into a spectacle rather than a serious criminal case....
The September 1 hearing was set to be an important step in determining whether Robinson would be ordered to stand trial for the killing of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University in September 2025. Judge Graf was expected to hear arguments about the evidence introduced during the July preliminary hearing and decide whether prosecutors had established probable cause to move the case forward. Robinson’s lawyers were also challenging the prosecution’s use of hearsay and disputing the aggravating factor that could make the case eligible for the death penalty, specifically the allegation that Robinson endangered numerous people by firing into a crowded area. Prosecutors countered that Robinson had demonstrated poor shooting accuracy in practice and therefore created a substantial risk to bystanders, while the defense emphasized that only one shot was fired and that it struck Kirk alone. Robinson had not yet entered a plea, making the upcoming hearing another major battleground over both the evidence against him and how much of the case the public should be allowed to watch in real time.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Accused Charlie Kirk assassin Tyler Robinson's lawyers seek camera ban | Fox News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>720epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/bill-clinton-and-the-transcript-from-his-epstein-related-interview-with-congress-part-6-8-27-26--74702131Bill Clinton’s February 27, 2026 testimony before the House Oversight Committee finally forced him to answer under oath about a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that had generated questions for decades, but the proceeding hardly delivered the kind of exhaustive accounting the public had been promised. Clinton insisted that he had “done nothing wrong,” knew nothing about Epstein’s abuse and never witnessed anything that caused him concern, effectively asking lawmakers to accept that his repeated contact with Epstein, travel aboard Epstein’s aircraft and proximity to Ghislaine Maxwell never exposed him to anything suspicious. That explanation deserved considerably more scrutiny than it received. Clinton had not volunteered for the deposition either. He resisted the committee’s subpoena, failed to appear for a scheduled January 13 deposition and only agreed to testify after a bipartisan contempt resolution advanced against him. Yet when he finally appeared, even some lawmakers who had spent months demanding answers quickly described him as cooperative and candid. The central problem remained unresolved: Clinton’s defense depended heavily on what he claimed not to have seen, not to have known and not to remember, while the documentary record established that his association with Epstein was substantial enough to demand far more than a polite acceptance of those denials.

The congressional process itself also exposed the weaknesses that have plagued nearly every official examination of Epstein’s network. Rather than methodically reconstructing Clinton’s relationship with Epstein against flight records, photographs, visitor records, witness accounts and contemporaneous communications, the deposition became entangled in the same partisan warfare that repeatedly consumes the Epstein investigation. Republicans emphasized Clinton while Democrats complained that Donald Trump had not been subpoenaed, and Chairman James Comer immediately used Clinton’s answers to make political claims about Trump rather than keeping the focus exclusively on Epstein and the unanswered questions surrounding Clinton himself. Clinton’s testimony therefore produced another familiar outcome: a powerful person denied knowledge of Epstein’s crimes, lawmakers divided themselves into political camps, and very little was done to independently test how plausible those denials actually were. Clinton’s appearance was historically significant because Congress compelled a former president to testify, but significance should not be confused with accountability. After years of questions about one of the most prominent men in Epstein’s orbit, the public was still largely left with Clinton’s version of events and a congressional process that appeared more interested in scoring partisan points than aggressively determining whether that version could withstand sustained scrutiny.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74702131Thu, 27 Aug 2026 20:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBill Clinton’s February 27, 2026 testimony before the House Oversight Committee finally forced him to answer under oath about a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that had generated questions for decades, but the proceeding hardly delivered the kind of...Bill Clinton’s February 27, 2026 testimony before the House Oversight Committee finally forced him to answer under oath about a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that had generated questions for decades, but the proceeding hardly delivered the kind of exhaustive accounting the public had been promised. Clinton insisted that he had “done nothing wrong,” knew nothing about Epstein’s abuse and never witnessed anything that caused him concern, effectively asking lawmakers to accept that his repeated contact with Epstein, travel aboard Epstein’s aircraft and proximity to Ghislaine Maxwell never exposed him to anything suspicious. That explanation deserved considerably more scrutiny than it received. Clinton had not volunteered for the deposition either. He resisted the committee’s subpoena, failed to appear for a scheduled January 13 deposition and only agreed to testify after a bipartisan contempt resolution advanced against him. Yet when he finally appeared, even some lawmakers who had spent months demanding answers quickly described him as cooperative and candid. The central problem remained unresolved: Clinton’s defense depended heavily on what he claimed not to have seen, not to have known and not to remember, while the documentary record established that his association with Epstein was substantial enough to demand far more than a polite acceptance of those denials.

The congressional process itself also exposed the weaknesses that have plagued nearly every official examination of Epstein’s network. Rather than methodically reconstructing Clinton’s relationship with Epstein against flight records, photographs, visitor records, witness accounts and contemporaneous communications, the deposition became entangled in the same partisan warfare that repeatedly consumes the Epstein investigation. Republicans emphasized Clinton while Democrats complained that Donald Trump had not been subpoenaed, and Chairman James Comer immediately used Clinton’s answers to make political claims about Trump rather than keeping the focus exclusively on Epstein and the unanswered questions surrounding Clinton himself. Clinton’s testimony therefore produced another familiar outcome: a powerful person denied knowledge of Epstein’s crimes, lawmakers divided themselves into political camps, and very little was done to independently test how plausible those denials actually were. Clinton’s appearance was historically significant because Congress compelled a former president to testify, but significance should not be confused with accountability. After years of questions about one of the most prominent men in Epstein’s orbit, the public was still largely left with Clinton’s version of events and a congressional process that appeared more interested in scoring partisan points than aggressively determining whether that version could withstand sustained scrutiny.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>741epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/bill-clinton-and-the-transcript-from-his-epstein-related-interview-with-congress-part-5-8-27-26--74702130Bill Clinton’s February 27, 2026 testimony before the House Oversight Committee finally forced him to answer under oath about a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that had generated questions for decades, but the proceeding hardly delivered the kind of exhaustive accounting the public had been promised. Clinton insisted that he had “done nothing wrong,” knew nothing about Epstein’s abuse and never witnessed anything that caused him concern, effectively asking lawmakers to accept that his repeated contact with Epstein, travel aboard Epstein’s aircraft and proximity to Ghislaine Maxwell never exposed him to anything suspicious. That explanation deserved considerably more scrutiny than it received. Clinton had not volunteered for the deposition either. He resisted the committee’s subpoena, failed to appear for a scheduled January 13 deposition and only agreed to testify after a bipartisan contempt resolution advanced against him. Yet when he finally appeared, even some lawmakers who had spent months demanding answers quickly described him as cooperative and candid. The central problem remained unresolved: Clinton’s defense depended heavily on what he claimed not to have seen, not to have known and not to remember, while the documentary record established that his association with Epstein was substantial enough to demand far more than a polite acceptance of those denials.

The congressional process itself also exposed the weaknesses that have plagued nearly every official examination of Epstein’s network. Rather than methodically reconstructing Clinton’s relationship with Epstein against flight records, photographs, visitor records, witness accounts and contemporaneous communications, the deposition became entangled in the same partisan warfare that repeatedly consumes the Epstein investigation. Republicans emphasized Clinton while Democrats complained that Donald Trump had not been subpoenaed, and Chairman James Comer immediately used Clinton’s answers to make political claims about Trump rather than keeping the focus exclusively on Epstein and the unanswered questions surrounding Clinton himself. Clinton’s testimony therefore produced another familiar outcome: a powerful person denied knowledge of Epstein’s crimes, lawmakers divided themselves into political camps, and very little was done to independently test how plausible those denials actually were. Clinton’s appearance was historically significant because Congress compelled a former president to testify, but significance should not be confused with accountability. After years of questions about one of the most prominent men in Epstein’s orbit, the public was still largely left with Clinton’s version of events and a congressional process that appeared more interested in scoring partisan points than aggressively determining whether that version could withstand sustained scrutiny.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74702130Thu, 27 Aug 2026 18:30:03 +0000Bobby CapucciBill Clinton’s February 27, 2026 testimony before the House Oversight Committee finally forced him to answer under oath about a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that had generated questions for decades, but the proceeding hardly delivered the kind of...Bill Clinton’s February 27, 2026 testimony before the House Oversight Committee finally forced him to answer under oath about a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that had generated questions for decades, but the proceeding hardly delivered the kind of exhaustive accounting the public had been promised. Clinton insisted that he had “done nothing wrong,” knew nothing about Epstein’s abuse and never witnessed anything that caused him concern, effectively asking lawmakers to accept that his repeated contact with Epstein, travel aboard Epstein’s aircraft and proximity to Ghislaine Maxwell never exposed him to anything suspicious. That explanation deserved considerably more scrutiny than it received. Clinton had not volunteered for the deposition either. He resisted the committee’s subpoena, failed to appear for a scheduled January 13 deposition and only agreed to testify after a bipartisan contempt resolution advanced against him. Yet when he finally appeared, even some lawmakers who had spent months demanding answers quickly described him as cooperative and candid. The central problem remained unresolved: Clinton’s defense depended heavily on what he claimed not to have seen, not to have known and not to remember, while the documentary record established that his association with Epstein was substantial enough to demand far more than a polite acceptance of those denials.

The congressional process itself also exposed the weaknesses that have plagued nearly every official examination of Epstein’s network. Rather than methodically reconstructing Clinton’s relationship with Epstein against flight records, photographs, visitor records, witness accounts and contemporaneous communications, the deposition became entangled in the same partisan warfare that repeatedly consumes the Epstein investigation. Republicans emphasized Clinton while Democrats complained that Donald Trump had not been subpoenaed, and Chairman James Comer immediately used Clinton’s answers to make political claims about Trump rather than keeping the focus exclusively on Epstein and the unanswered questions surrounding Clinton himself. Clinton’s testimony therefore produced another familiar outcome: a powerful person denied knowledge of Epstein’s crimes, lawmakers divided themselves into political camps, and very little was done to independently test how plausible those denials actually were. Clinton’s appearance was historically significant because Congress compelled a former president to testify, but significance should not be confused with accountability. After years of questions about one of the most prominent men in Epstein’s orbit, the public was still largely left with Clinton’s version of events and a congressional process that appeared more interested in scoring partisan points than aggressively determining whether that version could withstand sustained scrutiny.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1090epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-judge-hippler-sets-the-framework-for-bryan-kohberger-s-guilty-plea-challenge-8-27-267--74717695
Hippler is also making clear that any attempt to reopen the case will be governed by strict evidentiary rules rather than simply by Kohberger’s allegations. The judge has ordered both sides to identify potential witnesses, including expert witnesses, by early February and has warned that attorneys could face sanctions if they fail to comply with Idaho’s procedural and evidentiary requirements. A status conference is on the calendar for June 2027, but the key distinction is that Kohberger has not yet won a hearing on the merits of his claims, much less permission to withdraw his guilty plea. The order instead creates a framework for the court to determine whether an evidentiary hearing is warranted after reviewing the filings and evidence presented by both sides. That leaves Kohberger’s challenge alive, but still facing a substantial legal hurdle before the court considers unraveling the plea agreement and reopening the murder case.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

A June date on the calendar, but no hearing yet for Bryan Kohberger’s plea challenge

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74717695Thu, 27 Aug 2026 16:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBryan Kohberger’s effort to withdraw his guilty plea is moving forward procedurally, but Fourth District Judge Steven Hippler has not yet decided that Kohberger is entitled to an evidentiary hearing. Hippler has issued an order laying out how the...
Hippler is also making clear that any attempt to reopen the case will be governed by strict evidentiary rules rather than simply by Kohberger’s allegations. The judge has ordered both sides to identify potential witnesses, including expert witnesses, by early February and has warned that attorneys could face sanctions if they fail to comply with Idaho’s procedural and evidentiary requirements. A status conference is on the calendar for June 2027, but the key distinction is that Kohberger has not yet won a hearing on the merits of his claims, much less permission to withdraw his guilty plea. The order instead creates a framework for the court to determine whether an evidentiary hearing is warranted after reviewing the filings and evidence presented by both sides. That leaves Kohberger’s challenge alive, but still facing a substantial legal hurdle before the court considers unraveling the plea agreement and reopening the murder case.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

A June date on the calendar, but no hearing yet for Bryan Kohberger’s plea challenge

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>630bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/federal-judge-dismantles-ghislaine-maxwell-s-challenge-to-her-conviction-8-27-26--74702134A federal judge in New York rejected Ghislaine Maxwell’s latest attempt to overturn her conviction and 20-year prison sentence, delivering a sweeping rebuke of arguments she claimed were strengthened by documents released under the Epstein Files Transparency Act. Maxwell argued that the newly released material showed constitutional and legal violations surrounding her prosecution, including allegations that the government withheld evidence, witnesses testified falsely and attorneys representing Epstein victims effectively became part of the prosecution effort against her. U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer rejected those claims in a 67-page decision, describing Maxwell’s arguments as largely “meritless” or “frivolous” and finding that the supposed new evidence was mostly irrelevant to the charges for which she was convicted. More damaging to Maxwell’s position, Engelmayer concluded that some of the newly released material actually reinforced the government’s case rather than undermined it.

Engelmayer also rejected Maxwell’s broader contention that prosecutors unfairly targeted her as a substitute for Jeffrey Epstein following his death in federal custody. He pointed instead to the extensive evidence presented at trial establishing Maxwell’s knowing participation in facilitating Epstein’s abuse of underage girls and called her prosecution justified rather than discriminatory. The judge denied all 10 principal claims raised in Maxwell’s petition, refused her request for an evidentiary hearing and declined to issue a certificate that would make an appeal easier to pursue, writing that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. The ruling represented another major legal defeat for Maxwell after a federal appeals court previously upheld her conviction and the Supreme Court declined to hear her earlier challenge. With her efforts to overturn the conviction repeatedly failing, Maxwell’s remaining avenues for relief appeared increasingly narrow, potentially leaving presidential clemency or a pardon among the few significant options still available to her.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Judge rejects Ghislaine Maxwell's 'frivolous' attempt to overturn conviction - ABC News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74702134Thu, 27 Aug 2026 14:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciA federal judge in New York rejected Ghislaine Maxwell’s latest attempt to overturn her conviction and 20-year prison sentence, delivering a sweeping rebuke of arguments she claimed were strengthened by documents released under the Epstein Files...A federal judge in New York rejected Ghislaine Maxwell’s latest attempt to overturn her conviction and 20-year prison sentence, delivering a sweeping rebuke of arguments she claimed were strengthened by documents released under the Epstein Files Transparency Act. Maxwell argued that the newly released material showed constitutional and legal violations surrounding her prosecution, including allegations that the government withheld evidence, witnesses testified falsely and attorneys representing Epstein victims effectively became part of the prosecution effort against her. U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer rejected those claims in a 67-page decision, describing Maxwell’s arguments as largely “meritless” or “frivolous” and finding that the supposed new evidence was mostly irrelevant to the charges for which she was convicted. More damaging to Maxwell’s position, Engelmayer concluded that some of the newly released material actually reinforced the government’s case rather than undermined it.

Engelmayer also rejected Maxwell’s broader contention that prosecutors unfairly targeted her as a substitute for Jeffrey Epstein following his death in federal custody. He pointed instead to the extensive evidence presented at trial establishing Maxwell’s knowing participation in facilitating Epstein’s abuse of underage girls and called her prosecution justified rather than discriminatory. The judge denied all 10 principal claims raised in Maxwell’s petition, refused her request for an evidentiary hearing and declined to issue a certificate that would make an appeal easier to pursue, writing that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. The ruling represented another major legal defeat for Maxwell after a federal appeals court previously upheld her conviction and the Supreme Court declined to hear her earlier challenge. With her efforts to overturn the conviction repeatedly failing, Maxwell’s remaining avenues for relief appeared increasingly narrow, potentially leaving presidential clemency or a pardon among the few significant options still available to her.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Judge rejects Ghislaine Maxwell's 'frivolous' attempt to overturn conviction - ABC News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>674epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/doj-appeals-judge-sullivan-s-epstein-files-ruling-in-katie-phang-lawsuit-8-27-26--74702133The Justice Department moved to appeal Judge Emmet Sullivan’s rulings in Katie Phang’s lawsuit over compliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act, escalating a fight that had already produced unusually sharp criticism of the government’s handling of the records. Sullivan had granted Phang a preliminary injunction in June 2026 after concluding that the government had failed to meaningfully answer key portions of her argument and had effectively conceded important points concerning compliance with the law. His orders required the DOJ to address disputed redactions, review and produce certain foreign-language material, provide information concerning underlying FBI interview records, and publish the redaction log required by the statute. Sullivan later ordered the government to provide unredacted records for his own private review so he could determine whether the DOJ’s stated reasons for withholding names and information were legitimate.

On August 24, 2026, the DOJ filed a protective notice of appeal, signaling that it intended to challenge Sullivan’s order rather than simply accept the court’s interpretation of what the Epstein transparency law required. The department maintained that at least some of the disputed redactions were necessary to protect victims, private individuals and other sensitive information, while Phang’s case argued that the government had withheld or obscured information beyond what Congress permitted when it ordered the Epstein records released. The appeal therefore set up a larger fight over how much discretion the Justice Department actually retained after Congress enacted a law specifically designed to force broad disclosure of its Epstein material. Instead of resolving the transparency dispute, the government’s decision to appeal ensured that the battle would move higher into the federal courts, with the central question becoming whether Sullivan had gone too far in compelling disclosure or whether the DOJ itself had failed to carry out the disclosure mandate Congress imposed.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74702133Thu, 27 Aug 2026 12:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe Justice Department moved to appeal Judge Emmet Sullivan’s rulings in Katie Phang’s lawsuit over compliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act, escalating a fight that had already produced unusually sharp criticism of the government’s handling...The Justice Department moved to appeal Judge Emmet Sullivan’s rulings in Katie Phang’s lawsuit over compliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act, escalating a fight that had already produced unusually sharp criticism of the government’s handling of the records. Sullivan had granted Phang a preliminary injunction in June 2026 after concluding that the government had failed to meaningfully answer key portions of her argument and had effectively conceded important points concerning compliance with the law. His orders required the DOJ to address disputed redactions, review and produce certain foreign-language material, provide information concerning underlying FBI interview records, and publish the redaction log required by the statute. Sullivan later ordered the government to provide unredacted records for his own private review so he could determine whether the DOJ’s stated reasons for withholding names and information were legitimate.

On August 24, 2026, the DOJ filed a protective notice of appeal, signaling that it intended to challenge Sullivan’s order rather than simply accept the court’s interpretation of what the Epstein transparency law required. The department maintained that at least some of the disputed redactions were necessary to protect victims, private individuals and other sensitive information, while Phang’s case argued that the government had withheld or obscured information beyond what Congress permitted when it ordered the Epstein records released. The appeal therefore set up a larger fight over how much discretion the Justice Department actually retained after Congress enacted a law specifically designed to force broad disclosure of its Epstein material. Instead of resolving the transparency dispute, the government’s decision to appeal ensured that the battle would move higher into the federal courts, with the central question becoming whether Sullivan had gone too far in compelling disclosure or whether the DOJ itself had failed to carry out the disclosure mandate Congress imposed.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>630epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-investigation-in-idaho-and-the-sleuth-s-who-got-in-the-way-8-27-26--74698473Moscow Police repeatedly warned that the flood of online sleuthing surrounding the University of Idaho murders was creating real problems for the investigation. As speculation exploded across Reddit, TikTok, Facebook, YouTube and other platforms, amateur investigators began naming supposed suspects, dissecting victims’ relationships, scrutinizing friends and acquaintances, and circulating theories that often had little or no evidentiary foundation. Police stressed that rumors, misinformation and unsupported accusations could damage innocent people, overwhelm investigators with useless tips and make it harder to separate legitimate leads from internet noise. They also urged the public to stop contacting people connected to the case directly and to send credible information through official tip lines instead of trying to conduct their own parallel investigation.

The department’s frustration grew as online speculation increasingly targeted people whom investigators had already looked at and, in some cases, publicly ruled out. Moscow Police made clear that the public did not have access to the full body of evidence and therefore could not reliably reconstruct the case from scattered videos, social-media posts, photographs or partial timelines. Officials also warned that harassment and false accusations could have lasting consequences for people who were simply witnesses, friends, former partners or members of the community. Their message was essentially that crowdsourced attention could be useful when it produced genuine evidence, but internet vigilantism was something else entirely. In the end, Moscow Police treated the sleuth culture surrounding the murders as both a distraction and a potential threat to the integrity of the investigation, repeatedly asking people to let detectives follow the evidence rather than allowing rumor to dictate who should be considered suspicious.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com









Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74698473Thu, 27 Aug 2026 10:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciMoscow Police repeatedly warned that the flood of online sleuthing surrounding the University of Idaho murders was creating real problems for the investigation. As speculation exploded across Reddit, TikTok, Facebook, YouTube and other platforms,...Moscow Police repeatedly warned that the flood of online sleuthing surrounding the University of Idaho murders was creating real problems for the investigation. As speculation exploded across Reddit, TikTok, Facebook, YouTube and other platforms, amateur investigators began naming supposed suspects, dissecting victims’ relationships, scrutinizing friends and acquaintances, and circulating theories that often had little or no evidentiary foundation. Police stressed that rumors, misinformation and unsupported accusations could damage innocent people, overwhelm investigators with useless tips and make it harder to separate legitimate leads from internet noise. They also urged the public to stop contacting people connected to the case directly and to send credible information through official tip lines instead of trying to conduct their own parallel investigation.

The department’s frustration grew as online speculation increasingly targeted people whom investigators had already looked at and, in some cases, publicly ruled out. Moscow Police made clear that the public did not have access to the full body of evidence and therefore could not reliably reconstruct the case from scattered videos, social-media posts, photographs or partial timelines. Officials also warned that harassment and false accusations could have lasting consequences for people who were simply witnesses, friends, former partners or members of the community. Their message was essentially that crowdsourced attention could be useful when it produced genuine evidence, but internet vigilantism was something else entirely. In the end, Moscow Police treated the sleuth culture surrounding the murders as both a distraction and a potential threat to the integrity of the investigation, repeatedly asking people to let detectives follow the evidence rather than allowing rumor to dictate who should be considered suspicious.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com









Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3435bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-prosecutors-challenge-kohberger-s-venue-change-report-8-27-26--74698472Prosecutors pushed back against Bryan Kohberger’s scientific report supporting a change of venue by arguing that the defense had overstated what its survey data actually proved about potential juror bias in Latah County. The defense had relied on polling and expert analysis to argue that pretrial publicity had poisoned the local jury pool and made it impossible for Kohberger to receive a fair trial in Moscow. The State countered that widespread familiarity with the case was not the same thing as fixed prejudice and emphasized that jurors could know about the murders without having already decided Kohberger was guilty. Prosecutors also challenged the methodology and interpretation behind the defense study, arguing that some of the questions were leading, that attitudes measured in a survey did not necessarily predict how prospective jurors would behave under oath, and that voir dire remained the proper mechanism for identifying and removing biased jurors.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74698472Thu, 27 Aug 2026 08:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciProsecutors pushed back against Bryan Kohberger’s scientific report supporting a change of venue by arguing that the defense had overstated what its survey data actually proved about potential juror bias in Latah County. The defense had relied on...Prosecutors pushed back against Bryan Kohberger’s scientific report supporting a change of venue by arguing that the defense had overstated what its survey data actually proved about potential juror bias in Latah County. The defense had relied on polling and expert analysis to argue that pretrial publicity had poisoned the local jury pool and made it impossible for Kohberger to receive a fair trial in Moscow. The State countered that widespread familiarity with the case was not the same thing as fixed prejudice and emphasized that jurors could know about the murders without having already decided Kohberger was guilty. Prosecutors also challenged the methodology and interpretation behind the defense study, arguing that some of the questions were leading, that attitudes measured in a survey did not necessarily predict how prospective jurors would behave under oath, and that voir dire remained the proper mechanism for identifying and removing biased jurors.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2301bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-5-key-pieces-of-evidence-against-kohberger-according-to-experts-8-26-26--74698474
Mauro also highlighted surviving roommate Dylan Mortensen’s description of the masked man she saw leaving the house, saying her account of a tall, athletically built man with bushy eyebrows was broadly consistent with Kohberger’s appearance. He noted that investigators had also discovered a latent shoeprint along the route Mortensen said the intruder had taken, creating another piece of evidence prosecutors could potentially attempt to connect to Kohberger. Finally, Mauro pointed to Kohberger’s earlier criminology research, particularly a Reddit survey in which he had asked people who committed crimes about how they selected victims, prepared for offenses, approached targets and avoided detection. Mauro cautioned that Kohberger was still presumed innocent and that much remained unknown at that early stage, but he believed prosecutors already possessed several different categories of evidence that, when viewed together, could form a compelling narrative against him.












to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com









Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74698474Thu, 27 Aug 2026 06:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn January 2023, former NYPD inspector Paul Mauro argued that five pieces of evidence outlined in the probable cause affidavit had already created a potentially powerful circumstantial case against Bryan Kohberger. At the center was DNA recovered from...
Mauro also highlighted surviving roommate Dylan Mortensen’s description of the masked man she saw leaving the house, saying her account of a tall, athletically built man with bushy eyebrows was broadly consistent with Kohberger’s appearance. He noted that investigators had also discovered a latent shoeprint along the route Mortensen said the intruder had taken, creating another piece of evidence prosecutors could potentially attempt to connect to Kohberger. Finally, Mauro pointed to Kohberger’s earlier criminology research, particularly a Reddit survey in which he had asked people who committed crimes about how they selected victims, prepared for offenses, approached targets and avoided detection. Mauro cautioned that Kohberger was still presumed innocent and that much remained unknown at that early stage, but he believed prosecutors already possessed several different categories of evidence that, when viewed together, could form a compelling narrative against him.












to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com









Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2381bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-jack-ducoeur-s-family-described-his-grief-after-kaylee-goncalves-was-killed--74698184Six weeks after the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, Kaylee’s former boyfriend, Jack DuCoeur, was described by relatives as devastated by her death and overwhelmed by the suspicion that had been directed toward him in the immediate aftermath. DuCoeur and Goncalves had dated for roughly five years before breaking up only weeks before the murders, though family members said the split had been amicable and that the two remained close. Because Goncalves and Mogen had repeatedly called DuCoeur in the hours before they were killed, he quickly became a focus of public speculation, particularly online. Police, however, investigated him and said they did not believe he was involved in the murders. His family said the accusations had compounded his grief, leaving him to mourn someone he had loved while strangers continued to question whether he had played some role in her death despite authorities clearing him.

DuCoeur’s family also said he was struggling with the idea of returning to the University of Idaho because so much of his life in Moscow had been connected to Goncalves. At that point in December 2022, the murders remained unsolved, the weapon had not been recovered and police had not publicly identified a suspect, creating an atmosphere in which rumors and amateur theories flourished online. Goncalves’ family continued pressing for answers and raising money to potentially hire private investigators and obtain additional legal assistance as frustration grew over the lack of an arrest. The uncertainty surrounding the investigation left the families and the Moscow community in an agonizing state of limbo, while people such as DuCoeur found themselves dealing not only with enormous personal loss but also with the consequences of intense public speculation during the earliest and most chaotic stage of the case.






to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonnmail.com



https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/crime/idaho-college-murders-reddit-murder-house-moscow-b2250369.html













Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74698184Thu, 27 Aug 2026 04:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciSix weeks after the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, Kaylee’s former boyfriend, Jack DuCoeur, was described by relatives as devastated by her death and overwhelmed by the suspicion that had been directed...Six weeks after the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, Kaylee’s former boyfriend, Jack DuCoeur, was described by relatives as devastated by her death and overwhelmed by the suspicion that had been directed toward him in the immediate aftermath. DuCoeur and Goncalves had dated for roughly five years before breaking up only weeks before the murders, though family members said the split had been amicable and that the two remained close. Because Goncalves and Mogen had repeatedly called DuCoeur in the hours before they were killed, he quickly became a focus of public speculation, particularly online. Police, however, investigated him and said they did not believe he was involved in the murders. His family said the accusations had compounded his grief, leaving him to mourn someone he had loved while strangers continued to question whether he had played some role in her death despite authorities clearing him.

DuCoeur’s family also said he was struggling with the idea of returning to the University of Idaho because so much of his life in Moscow had been connected to Goncalves. At that point in December 2022, the murders remained unsolved, the weapon had not been recovered and police had not publicly identified a suspect, creating an atmosphere in which rumors and amateur theories flourished online. Goncalves’ family continued pressing for answers and raising money to potentially hire private investigators and obtain additional legal assistance as frustration grew over the lack of an arrest. The uncertainty surrounding the investigation left the families and the Moscow community in an agonizing state of limbo, while people such as DuCoeur found themselves dealing not only with enormous personal loss but also with the consequences of intense public speculation during the earliest and most chaotic stage of the case.






to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonnmail.com



https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/crime/idaho-college-murders-reddit-murder-house-moscow-b2250369.html













Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>658bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-kaylee-maddie-and-the-final-phone-calls--74698185
At that stage of the investigation, authorities had not identified a suspect, recovered the murder weapon or publicly explained exactly what had happened inside the King Road house, leaving a vacuum that was rapidly filled by speculation. Police said they were aware of the calls and were looking into everyone connected to the victims, but they ultimately said they did not believe DuCoeur was involved. The intense focus on him illustrated how quickly friends, acquaintances and former partners of the victims became subjects of public suspicion while investigators were still working through evidence and interviews. With no arrest yet made and few concrete answers available, the case remained highly fluid, and details such as the late-night calls took on outsized significance even though they did not ultimately establish DuCoeur as a suspect in the murders.





to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11447075/Two-female-Idaho-students-four-killed-phoned-mystery-man-called-Jack-ten-times.html










Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74698185Thu, 27 Aug 2026 02:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn the days after the November 2022 murders of University of Idaho students Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, investigators were examining a series of phone calls made by Goncalves and Mogen shortly before they were...
At that stage of the investigation, authorities had not identified a suspect, recovered the murder weapon or publicly explained exactly what had happened inside the King Road house, leaving a vacuum that was rapidly filled by speculation. Police said they were aware of the calls and were looking into everyone connected to the victims, but they ultimately said they did not believe DuCoeur was involved. The intense focus on him illustrated how quickly friends, acquaintances and former partners of the victims became subjects of public suspicion while investigators were still working through evidence and interviews. With no arrest yet made and few concrete answers available, the case remained highly fluid, and details such as the late-night calls took on outsized significance even though they did not ultimately establish DuCoeur as a suspect in the murders.





to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11447075/Two-female-Idaho-students-four-killed-phoned-mystery-man-called-Jack-ten-times.html










Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>720bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcripts-day-1-part-9-8-26-26--74698110
The defense spent much of the first day attacking the manner in which the prosecution was getting its evidence into the record rather than attempting to disprove the entire prosecution theory at that stage. Kathryn Nester and Robinson’s attorneys repeatedly raised hearsay, foundation and authentication objections, arguing that investigators were being permitted to introduce reports, statements and records created by other people without those individuals appearing personally to testify. Judge Graf overruled most of those objections, reflecting the substantially lower evidentiary threshold governing a Utah preliminary hearing, whose purpose was only to determine whether probable cause existed to send Robinson to trial rather than whether prosecutors could prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. One significant exception involved an edited compilation of surveillance footage, which Graf declined to admit in that form and required prosecutors to replace with the underlying unedited material. Hull’s testimony also revealed the scope of the prosecution’s surveillance theory: investigators claimed Robinson had appeared on or around the UVU campus multiple times on September 10 and that they were attempting to stitch those appearances together into a continuous identification of the alleged shooter. By the end of day one, prosecutors had established the killing itself, the medical cause of Kirk’s death, the existence and authenticity of substantial video evidence and the beginnings of their effort to identify Robinson as the person captured in that footage. They had not yet presented many of the pieces expected to become more consequential later in the hearing, including the rifle and DNA evidence, Robinson’s alleged communications and admissions, and testimony concerning his roommate Lance Twiggs.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74698110Thu, 27 Aug 2026 00:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay one of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing on July 6, 2026, largely centered on prosecutors beginning to construct a timeline of Charlie Kirk’s killing at Utah Valley University and establishing the authenticity of the surveillance footage and...
The defense spent much of the first day attacking the manner in which the prosecution was getting its evidence into the record rather than attempting to disprove the entire prosecution theory at that stage. Kathryn Nester and Robinson’s attorneys repeatedly raised hearsay, foundation and authentication objections, arguing that investigators were being permitted to introduce reports, statements and records created by other people without those individuals appearing personally to testify. Judge Graf overruled most of those objections, reflecting the substantially lower evidentiary threshold governing a Utah preliminary hearing, whose purpose was only to determine whether probable cause existed to send Robinson to trial rather than whether prosecutors could prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. One significant exception involved an edited compilation of surveillance footage, which Graf declined to admit in that form and required prosecutors to replace with the underlying unedited material. Hull’s testimony also revealed the scope of the prosecution’s surveillance theory: investigators claimed Robinson had appeared on or around the UVU campus multiple times on September 10 and that they were attempting to stitch those appearances together into a continuous identification of the alleged shooter. By the end of day one, prosecutors had established the killing itself, the medical cause of Kirk’s death, the existence and authenticity of substantial video evidence and the beginnings of their effort to identify Robinson as the person captured in that footage. They had not yet presented many of the pieces expected to become more consequential later in the hearing, including the rifle and DNA evidence, Robinson’s alleged communications and admissions, and testimony concerning his roommate Lance Twiggs.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>637breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/bill-clinton-and-the-transcript-from-his-epstein-related-interview-with-congress-part-4-8-26-26--74688435Bill Clinton’s February 27, 2026 testimony before the House Oversight Committee finally forced him to answer under oath about a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that had generated questions for decades, but the proceeding hardly delivered the kind of exhaustive accounting the public had been promised. Clinton insisted that he had “done nothing wrong,” knew nothing about Epstein’s abuse and never witnessed anything that caused him concern, effectively asking lawmakers to accept that his repeated contact with Epstein, travel aboard Epstein’s aircraft and proximity to Ghislaine Maxwell never exposed him to anything suspicious. That explanation deserved considerably more scrutiny than it received. Clinton had not volunteered for the deposition either. He resisted the committee’s subpoena, failed to appear for a scheduled January 13 deposition and only agreed to testify after a bipartisan contempt resolution advanced against him. Yet when he finally appeared, even some lawmakers who had spent months demanding answers quickly described him as cooperative and candid. The central problem remained unresolved: Clinton’s defense depended heavily on what he claimed not to have seen, not to have known and not to remember, while the documentary record established that his association with Epstein was substantial enough to demand far more than a polite acceptance of those denials.

The congressional process itself also exposed the weaknesses that have plagued nearly every official examination of Epstein’s network. Rather than methodically reconstructing Clinton’s relationship with Epstein against flight records, photographs, visitor records, witness accounts and contemporaneous communications, the deposition became entangled in the same partisan warfare that repeatedly consumes the Epstein investigation. Republicans emphasized Clinton while Democrats complained that Donald Trump had not been subpoenaed, and Chairman James Comer immediately used Clinton’s answers to make political claims about Trump rather than keeping the focus exclusively on Epstein and the unanswered questions surrounding Clinton himself. Clinton’s testimony therefore produced another familiar outcome: a powerful person denied knowledge of Epstein’s crimes, lawmakers divided themselves into political camps, and very little was done to independently test how plausible those denials actually were. Clinton’s appearance was historically significant because Congress compelled a former president to testify, but significance should not be confused with accountability. After years of questions about one of the most prominent men in Epstein’s orbit, the public was still largely left with Clinton’s version of events and a congressional process that appeared more interested in scoring partisan points than aggressively determining whether that version could withstand sustained scrutiny.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74688435Wed, 26 Aug 2026 22:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBill Clinton’s February 27, 2026 testimony before the House Oversight Committee finally forced him to answer under oath about a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that had generated questions for decades, but the proceeding hardly delivered the kind of...Bill Clinton’s February 27, 2026 testimony before the House Oversight Committee finally forced him to answer under oath about a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that had generated questions for decades, but the proceeding hardly delivered the kind of exhaustive accounting the public had been promised. Clinton insisted that he had “done nothing wrong,” knew nothing about Epstein’s abuse and never witnessed anything that caused him concern, effectively asking lawmakers to accept that his repeated contact with Epstein, travel aboard Epstein’s aircraft and proximity to Ghislaine Maxwell never exposed him to anything suspicious. That explanation deserved considerably more scrutiny than it received. Clinton had not volunteered for the deposition either. He resisted the committee’s subpoena, failed to appear for a scheduled January 13 deposition and only agreed to testify after a bipartisan contempt resolution advanced against him. Yet when he finally appeared, even some lawmakers who had spent months demanding answers quickly described him as cooperative and candid. The central problem remained unresolved: Clinton’s defense depended heavily on what he claimed not to have seen, not to have known and not to remember, while the documentary record established that his association with Epstein was substantial enough to demand far more than a polite acceptance of those denials.

The congressional process itself also exposed the weaknesses that have plagued nearly every official examination of Epstein’s network. Rather than methodically reconstructing Clinton’s relationship with Epstein against flight records, photographs, visitor records, witness accounts and contemporaneous communications, the deposition became entangled in the same partisan warfare that repeatedly consumes the Epstein investigation. Republicans emphasized Clinton while Democrats complained that Donald Trump had not been subpoenaed, and Chairman James Comer immediately used Clinton’s answers to make political claims about Trump rather than keeping the focus exclusively on Epstein and the unanswered questions surrounding Clinton himself. Clinton’s testimony therefore produced another familiar outcome: a powerful person denied knowledge of Epstein’s crimes, lawmakers divided themselves into political camps, and very little was done to independently test how plausible those denials actually were. Clinton’s appearance was historically significant because Congress compelled a former president to testify, but significance should not be confused with accountability. After years of questions about one of the most prominent men in Epstein’s orbit, the public was still largely left with Clinton’s version of events and a congressional process that appeared more interested in scoring partisan points than aggressively determining whether that version could withstand sustained scrutiny.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>735epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/bill-clinton-and-the-transcript-from-his-epstein-related-interview-with-congress-part-3-8-26-26--74688439Bill Clinton’s February 27, 2026 testimony before the House Oversight Committee finally forced him to answer under oath about a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that had generated questions for decades, but the proceeding hardly delivered the kind of exhaustive accounting the public had been promised. Clinton insisted that he had “done nothing wrong,” knew nothing about Epstein’s abuse and never witnessed anything that caused him concern, effectively asking lawmakers to accept that his repeated contact with Epstein, travel aboard Epstein’s aircraft and proximity to Ghislaine Maxwell never exposed him to anything suspicious. That explanation deserved considerably more scrutiny than it received. Clinton had not volunteered for the deposition either. He resisted the committee’s subpoena, failed to appear for a scheduled January 13 deposition and only agreed to testify after a bipartisan contempt resolution advanced against him. Yet when he finally appeared, even some lawmakers who had spent months demanding answers quickly described him as cooperative and candid. The central problem remained unresolved: Clinton’s defense depended heavily on what he claimed not to have seen, not to have known and not to remember, while the documentary record established that his association with Epstein was substantial enough to demand far more than a polite acceptance of those denials.

The congressional process itself also exposed the weaknesses that have plagued nearly every official examination of Epstein’s network. Rather than methodically reconstructing Clinton’s relationship with Epstein against flight records, photographs, visitor records, witness accounts and contemporaneous communications, the deposition became entangled in the same partisan warfare that repeatedly consumes the Epstein investigation. Republicans emphasized Clinton while Democrats complained that Donald Trump had not been subpoenaed, and Chairman James Comer immediately used Clinton’s answers to make political claims about Trump rather than keeping the focus exclusively on Epstein and the unanswered questions surrounding Clinton himself. Clinton’s testimony therefore produced another familiar outcome: a powerful person denied knowledge of Epstein’s crimes, lawmakers divided themselves into political camps, and very little was done to independently test how plausible those denials actually were. Clinton’s appearance was historically significant because Congress compelled a former president to testify, but significance should not be confused with accountability. After years of questions about one of the most prominent men in Epstein’s orbit, the public was still largely left with Clinton’s version of events and a congressional process that appeared more interested in scoring partisan points than aggressively determining whether that version could withstand sustained scrutiny.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74688439Wed, 26 Aug 2026 20:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBill Clinton’s February 27, 2026 testimony before the House Oversight Committee finally forced him to answer under oath about a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that had generated questions for decades, but the proceeding hardly delivered the kind of...Bill Clinton’s February 27, 2026 testimony before the House Oversight Committee finally forced him to answer under oath about a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that had generated questions for decades, but the proceeding hardly delivered the kind of exhaustive accounting the public had been promised. Clinton insisted that he had “done nothing wrong,” knew nothing about Epstein’s abuse and never witnessed anything that caused him concern, effectively asking lawmakers to accept that his repeated contact with Epstein, travel aboard Epstein’s aircraft and proximity to Ghislaine Maxwell never exposed him to anything suspicious. That explanation deserved considerably more scrutiny than it received. Clinton had not volunteered for the deposition either. He resisted the committee’s subpoena, failed to appear for a scheduled January 13 deposition and only agreed to testify after a bipartisan contempt resolution advanced against him. Yet when he finally appeared, even some lawmakers who had spent months demanding answers quickly described him as cooperative and candid. The central problem remained unresolved: Clinton’s defense depended heavily on what he claimed not to have seen, not to have known and not to remember, while the documentary record established that his association with Epstein was substantial enough to demand far more than a polite acceptance of those denials.

The congressional process itself also exposed the weaknesses that have plagued nearly every official examination of Epstein’s network. Rather than methodically reconstructing Clinton’s relationship with Epstein against flight records, photographs, visitor records, witness accounts and contemporaneous communications, the deposition became entangled in the same partisan warfare that repeatedly consumes the Epstein investigation. Republicans emphasized Clinton while Democrats complained that Donald Trump had not been subpoenaed, and Chairman James Comer immediately used Clinton’s answers to make political claims about Trump rather than keeping the focus exclusively on Epstein and the unanswered questions surrounding Clinton himself. Clinton’s testimony therefore produced another familiar outcome: a powerful person denied knowledge of Epstein’s crimes, lawmakers divided themselves into political camps, and very little was done to independently test how plausible those denials actually were. Clinton’s appearance was historically significant because Congress compelled a former president to testify, but significance should not be confused with accountability. After years of questions about one of the most prominent men in Epstein’s orbit, the public was still largely left with Clinton’s version of events and a congressional process that appeared more interested in scoring partisan points than aggressively determining whether that version could withstand sustained scrutiny.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>971epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/how-influencer-culture-hijacked-the-epstein-transparency-debate-8-26-26--74688436When the Epstein scandal exploded back into the public conversation, it attracted an army of influencers who had spent years saying little or nothing about the case but suddenly presented themselves as authorities on Epstein, transparency, and justice. Some newcomers were undoubtedly sincere, but others recognized a massive engagement opportunity and treated the scandal as another piece of profitable content. The warning from the beginning was to watch what happened when the clicks slowed down, because genuine commitment is measured by who continues doing the work when the algorithm stops rewarding it. That prediction has largely played out, with many of the loudest voices moving on to newer controversies and tragedies once Epstein stopped generating the same level of attention. Their disappearance exposed the difference between people committed to understanding a complicated, decades-long scandal and those who were simply using victims, documents, outrage, and unanswered questions to grow audiences, sell products, and feed the machinery of online engagement.

The Epstein story is especially vulnerable to this kind of exploitation because it contains everything the modern attention economy rewards: wealth, sex, powerful people, secrecy, political connections, institutional failures, and unanswered questions. That environment encourages irresponsible personalities to turn uncertainty into certainty, speculation into fact, and the suffering of real victims into marketing material, while partisan commentators selectively weaponize Epstein against political enemies and ignore inconvenient evidence involving their own side. None of this means newcomers should be dismissed simply for arriving late, but genuine credibility requires humility, accuracy, consistency, and a willingness to keep following the evidence after the crowd moves on. The clearest measure of someone's motives is not how loudly they shouted when Epstein was trending, but whether they remained when the traffic disappeared. Anyone can champion a cause while the gravy train is rolling; the people worth listening to are the ones still doing the tedious, unglamorous work when there are fewer clicks, fewer rewards, and almost nobody left watching.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74688436Wed, 26 Aug 2026 18:30:04 +0000Bobby CapucciWhen the Epstein scandal exploded back into the public conversation, it attracted an army of influencers who had spent years saying little or nothing about the case but suddenly presented themselves as authorities on Epstein, transparency, and...When the Epstein scandal exploded back into the public conversation, it attracted an army of influencers who had spent years saying little or nothing about the case but suddenly presented themselves as authorities on Epstein, transparency, and justice. Some newcomers were undoubtedly sincere, but others recognized a massive engagement opportunity and treated the scandal as another piece of profitable content. The warning from the beginning was to watch what happened when the clicks slowed down, because genuine commitment is measured by who continues doing the work when the algorithm stops rewarding it. That prediction has largely played out, with many of the loudest voices moving on to newer controversies and tragedies once Epstein stopped generating the same level of attention. Their disappearance exposed the difference between people committed to understanding a complicated, decades-long scandal and those who were simply using victims, documents, outrage, and unanswered questions to grow audiences, sell products, and feed the machinery of online engagement.

The Epstein story is especially vulnerable to this kind of exploitation because it contains everything the modern attention economy rewards: wealth, sex, powerful people, secrecy, political connections, institutional failures, and unanswered questions. That environment encourages irresponsible personalities to turn uncertainty into certainty, speculation into fact, and the suffering of real victims into marketing material, while partisan commentators selectively weaponize Epstein against political enemies and ignore inconvenient evidence involving their own side. None of this means newcomers should be dismissed simply for arriving late, but genuine credibility requires humility, accuracy, consistency, and a willingness to keep following the evidence after the crowd moves on. The clearest measure of someone's motives is not how loudly they shouted when Epstein was trending, but whether they remained when the traffic disappeared. Anyone can champion a cause while the gravy train is rolling; the people worth listening to are the ones still doing the tedious, unglamorous work when there are fewer clicks, fewer rewards, and almost nobody left watching.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>948epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-the-experts-behind-the-case-against-bryan-kohberger-part-6-8-26-26--74697962
Sutton’s role became especially important because the defense retained its own crime-scene reconstruction experts, including Matthew Noedel and Dr. Brent Turvey, who challenged portions of the prosecution’s interpretation of the physical evidence. Her revised report therefore did more than simply describe the blood evidence; it also responded to those competing defense theories and explained why she believed certain features of the scene supported her conclusions. Had Kohberger’s case gone to trial, Sutton was expected to help prosecutors walk jurors through the bloodstain evidence and explain what it suggested about movement, contact and activity inside the house during and after the attacks. In that sense, she would have been one of the State’s key witnesses for translating the chaotic physical scene into a forensic reconstruction of how prosecutors believed the murders unfolded.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source: 

030326+REDACTED+Exhibits+S-1+through+S-13+to+States+Amended+Supp+Resp+to+Rqst+for+Disc+RE+Expert+Testimony.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74697962Wed, 26 Aug 2026 16:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciPaulette Sutton was one of the prosecution’s forensic experts in the case against Bryan Kohberger, and her specialty was crime-scene reconstruction and bloodstain-pattern analysis. Sutton reviewed the blood evidence documented inside 1122 King Road,...
Sutton’s role became especially important because the defense retained its own crime-scene reconstruction experts, including Matthew Noedel and Dr. Brent Turvey, who challenged portions of the prosecution’s interpretation of the physical evidence. Her revised report therefore did more than simply describe the blood evidence; it also responded to those competing defense theories and explained why she believed certain features of the scene supported her conclusions. Had Kohberger’s case gone to trial, Sutton was expected to help prosecutors walk jurors through the bloodstain evidence and explain what it suggested about movement, contact and activity inside the house during and after the attacks. In that sense, she would have been one of the State’s key witnesses for translating the chaotic physical scene into a forensic reconstruction of how prosecutors believed the murders unfolded.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source: 

030326+REDACTED+Exhibits+S-1+through+S-13+to+States+Amended+Supp+Resp+to+Rqst+for+Disc+RE+Expert+Testimony.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>779bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/ghislaine-maxwell-and-the-rise-and-fall-of-the-terramar-project-8-26-26--74688438
The project became even more controversial because of Maxwell's longstanding relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, whose 2008 conviction and later 2019 federal sex-trafficking charges cast a much darker light on her philanthropic persona. TerraMar abruptly announced that it was shutting down on July 12, 2019, less than a week after Epstein's arrest became public, effectively ending Maxwell's attempt to establish herself as a prominent environmental advocate. By then, Maxwell herself was facing renewed scrutiny over allegations concerning her role in Epstein's world, including litigation brought by one of his victims. The collapse of TerraMar ultimately became another example of the respectable public identity Maxwell constructed around elite institutions and philanthropy while serious allegations about her conduct alongside Epstein were closing in around her.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Whatever Happened to Ghislaine Maxwell’s Plan to Save the Oceans? - The New York Times

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74688438Wed, 26 Aug 2026 14:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciGhislaine Maxwell attempted to reinvent herself as an environmental philanthropist through the TerraMar Project, a nonprofit she founded in 2012 that promoted ocean conservation and protection of the high seas. TerraMar gave Maxwell access to...
The project became even more controversial because of Maxwell's longstanding relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, whose 2008 conviction and later 2019 federal sex-trafficking charges cast a much darker light on her philanthropic persona. TerraMar abruptly announced that it was shutting down on July 12, 2019, less than a week after Epstein's arrest became public, effectively ending Maxwell's attempt to establish herself as a prominent environmental advocate. By then, Maxwell herself was facing renewed scrutiny over allegations concerning her role in Epstein's world, including litigation brought by one of his victims. The collapse of TerraMar ultimately became another example of the respectable public identity Maxwell constructed around elite institutions and philanthropy while serious allegations about her conduct alongside Epstein were closing in around her.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Whatever Happened to Ghislaine Maxwell’s Plan to Save the Oceans? - The New York Times

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1222epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/andrew-rejects-balmoral-as-his-estrangement-from-the-royal-family-grows-8-26-26--74688437
The picture that emerged was of a former prince whose exile from royal life had become both public and personal. Royal experts said King Charles had reportedly not seen Andrew during 2026, while Prince Edward was believed to be one of the few family members who had visited him. Even Sarah Ferguson and Andrew’s daughters, Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie, were reportedly keeping their distance from his new residence. Some observers attributed Andrew’s refusal to attend Balmoral to humiliation and resentment, while others suggested arrogance and anger toward Charles and Prince William remained part of the equation. Whatever the reason, experts saw little possibility of any meaningful rehabilitation: they argued that Andrew’s Epstein association and the continuing revelations surrounding it had made a return to public royal life essentially impossible, particularly with Prince William eventually expected to inherit the throne. Even as Andrew reportedly complained of being abandoned, the monarchy appeared increasingly determined to keep its distance from a man whose relationship with Epstein had become one of the most damaging scandals in the modern royal family’s history.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Former Prince Andrew feels abandoned by royal family at Balmoral: experts | Fox News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74688437Wed, 26 Aug 2026 12:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciAndrew Mountbatten-Windsor was reportedly becoming increasingly isolated from the royal family, with friends saying he felt abandoned and no longer considered himself part of the family’s inner circle. Despite reportedly receiving an invitation from...
The picture that emerged was of a former prince whose exile from royal life had become both public and personal. Royal experts said King Charles had reportedly not seen Andrew during 2026, while Prince Edward was believed to be one of the few family members who had visited him. Even Sarah Ferguson and Andrew’s daughters, Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie, were reportedly keeping their distance from his new residence. Some observers attributed Andrew’s refusal to attend Balmoral to humiliation and resentment, while others suggested arrogance and anger toward Charles and Prince William remained part of the equation. Whatever the reason, experts saw little possibility of any meaningful rehabilitation: they argued that Andrew’s Epstein association and the continuing revelations surrounding it had made a return to public royal life essentially impossible, particularly with Prince William eventually expected to inherit the throne. Even as Andrew reportedly complained of being abandoned, the monarchy appeared increasingly determined to keep its distance from a man whose relationship with Epstein had become one of the most damaging scandals in the modern royal family’s history.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Former Prince Andrew feels abandoned by royal family at Balmoral: experts | Fox News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>838epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-s-life-in-jail-leading-up-to-the-trial-that-never-came-8-26-26--74685512After Bryan Kohberger was arrested and transferred to Idaho, reports about his life behind bars painted a picture of an intensely controlled and isolated existence as he waited for a trial that ultimately never happened. He was housed at the Latah County Jail under heightened security, separated from much of the general inmate population and closely monitored because of the extraordinary attention surrounding the case. Accounts from people familiar with the jail described Kohberger as largely quiet, disciplined and routine-oriented, spending much of his time meeting with attorneys, reading, reviewing case material and navigating the restrictions that came with being one of the most notorious pretrial detainees in the country. There were also periodic reports and rumors about his behavior, interactions with staff, food preferences and conditions of confinement, but much of that information came through unnamed sources or secondhand accounts and had to be treated cautiously. What was clear was that his life had become extremely regimented, with virtually every movement controlled as his defense team prepared for what was expected to be one of the most closely watched murder trials in recent memory.

That waiting period stretched on for more than two and a half years as Kohberger’s attorneys fought over evidence, expert testimony, the death penalty, venue, discovery, genetic genealogy, cellphone records and numerous other issues that would have shaped the eventual trial. During that time, Kohberger remained incarcerated while the case grew increasingly complex and expensive, and the public continued to speculate about how he was handling confinement and whether the pressure of jail was affecting him. The trial, however, never arrived. In July 2025, Kohberger pleaded guilty to murdering Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin in exchange for prosecutors taking the death penalty off the table, bringing the long pretrial period to an abrupt end. What had been years of preparation for a courtroom showdown instead became a transition from pretrial detention to a life sentence, leaving those years in jail as the strange middle chapter between Kohberger’s arrest and a trial the public had spent years expecting but would never see.












to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com









Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74685512Wed, 26 Aug 2026 10:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciAfter Bryan Kohberger was arrested and transferred to Idaho, reports about his life behind bars painted a picture of an intensely controlled and isolated existence as he waited for a trial that ultimately never happened. He was housed at the Latah...After Bryan Kohberger was arrested and transferred to Idaho, reports about his life behind bars painted a picture of an intensely controlled and isolated existence as he waited for a trial that ultimately never happened. He was housed at the Latah County Jail under heightened security, separated from much of the general inmate population and closely monitored because of the extraordinary attention surrounding the case. Accounts from people familiar with the jail described Kohberger as largely quiet, disciplined and routine-oriented, spending much of his time meeting with attorneys, reading, reviewing case material and navigating the restrictions that came with being one of the most notorious pretrial detainees in the country. There were also periodic reports and rumors about his behavior, interactions with staff, food preferences and conditions of confinement, but much of that information came through unnamed sources or secondhand accounts and had to be treated cautiously. What was clear was that his life had become extremely regimented, with virtually every movement controlled as his defense team prepared for what was expected to be one of the most closely watched murder trials in recent memory.

That waiting period stretched on for more than two and a half years as Kohberger’s attorneys fought over evidence, expert testimony, the death penalty, venue, discovery, genetic genealogy, cellphone records and numerous other issues that would have shaped the eventual trial. During that time, Kohberger remained incarcerated while the case grew increasingly complex and expensive, and the public continued to speculate about how he was handling confinement and whether the pressure of jail was affecting him. The trial, however, never arrived. In July 2025, Kohberger pleaded guilty to murdering Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin in exchange for prosecutors taking the death penalty off the table, bringing the long pretrial period to an abrupt end. What had been years of preparation for a courtroom showdown instead became a transition from pretrial detention to a life sentence, leaving those years in jail as the strange middle chapter between Kohberger’s arrest and a trial the public had spent years expecting but would never see.












to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com









Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2859bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-slow-nature-of-the-healing-process-on-the-campus-in-idaho-8-26-26--74685703The healing process at the University of Idaho was slow, uneven and deeply personal in the months and years after the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. The killings shattered the sense of safety in Moscow and left students, faculty and families trying to process the fact that four young people had been murdered just off campus in a crime that immediately drew national attention. Classes continued, memorials were held and counseling resources were expanded, but normal campus life did not simply snap back into place. Fear lingered, especially in the early weeks when no suspect had yet been arrested, and many students left town early, changed routines or remained uneasy about returning. Even after Bryan Kohberger was taken into custody, the grief did not disappear because the victims had been woven into the social fabric of the university, and reminders of them remained everywhere from classrooms and Greek life to vigils, scholarships and memorial efforts.

As time passed, the university community tried to move forward without pretending that moving forward meant forgetting. The demolition of the King Road house, the creation of memorials and continued efforts to honor the four victims became part of a broader attempt to give the campus some measure of closure, but there was never a single moment when the trauma was simply over. Every major court hearing, anniversary, documentary, news report and development in the Kohberger case reopened wounds for students and families who had already spent months living under intense public scrutiny. The university had to balance remembrance with the needs of thousands of students who still had classes to attend, degrees to finish and lives to build. In that sense, recovery was less about returning to the campus that existed before November 2022 and more about learning how to live with what had happened. The community slowly rebuilt its sense of normalcy, but the murders became a permanent part of the university's history and an event that continued to shape how people there understood safety, grief and loss.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74685703Wed, 26 Aug 2026 08:30:05 +0000Bobby CapucciThe healing process at the University of Idaho was slow, uneven and deeply personal in the months and years after the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. The killings shattered the sense of safety in Moscow and...The healing process at the University of Idaho was slow, uneven and deeply personal in the months and years after the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. The killings shattered the sense of safety in Moscow and left students, faculty and families trying to process the fact that four young people had been murdered just off campus in a crime that immediately drew national attention. Classes continued, memorials were held and counseling resources were expanded, but normal campus life did not simply snap back into place. Fear lingered, especially in the early weeks when no suspect had yet been arrested, and many students left town early, changed routines or remained uneasy about returning. Even after Bryan Kohberger was taken into custody, the grief did not disappear because the victims had been woven into the social fabric of the university, and reminders of them remained everywhere from classrooms and Greek life to vigils, scholarships and memorial efforts.

As time passed, the university community tried to move forward without pretending that moving forward meant forgetting. The demolition of the King Road house, the creation of memorials and continued efforts to honor the four victims became part of a broader attempt to give the campus some measure of closure, but there was never a single moment when the trauma was simply over. Every major court hearing, anniversary, documentary, news report and development in the Kohberger case reopened wounds for students and families who had already spent months living under intense public scrutiny. The university had to balance remembrance with the needs of thousands of students who still had classes to attend, degrees to finish and lives to build. In that sense, recovery was less about returning to the campus that existed before November 2022 and more about learning how to live with what had happened. The community slowly rebuilt its sense of normalcy, but the murders became a permanent part of the university's history and an event that continued to shape how people there understood safety, grief and loss.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2756bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-kohberger-s-motion-to-strike-death-penalty-on-grounds-of-speedy-trial-is-denied-8-25-26--74652725
Kohberger’s attorneys argue that Idaho’s right to a speedy trial conflicts with their ability to effectively defend against the death penalty. They claim that insufficient time has been allocated for preparing a defense in such a complex and high-stakes case​. Additionally, the defense is challenging several of the aggravating factors used to justify the death penalty, arguing that they are unconstitutionally vague and do not offer clear guidelines for jurors to follow. One key argument is that the statute under which these aggravators fall does not meet constitutional standards.

A hearing on the defense's motions is scheduled for November 7, 2024, while the prosecution must respond by October 10. The trial is set for June 2025​.

(commercial at 9:03)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

090524-Motion-to-Strike-Death-Penalty-Grounds-State-Speedy-Trial-Preventing.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74652725Wed, 26 Aug 2026 06:30:03 +0000Bobby CapucciBryan Kohberger’s defense team has filed multiple motions to strike the death penalty in his case, which involves the murders of four University of Idaho students in November 2022. Kohberger faces four counts of first-degree murder and one count of...
Kohberger’s attorneys argue that Idaho’s right to a speedy trial conflicts with their ability to effectively defend against the death penalty. They claim that insufficient time has been allocated for preparing a defense in such a complex and high-stakes case​. Additionally, the defense is challenging several of the aggravating factors used to justify the death penalty, arguing that they are unconstitutionally vague and do not offer clear guidelines for jurors to follow. One key argument is that the statute under which these aggravators fall does not meet constitutional standards.

A hearing on the defense's motions is scheduled for November 7, 2024, while the prosecution must respond by October 10. The trial is set for June 2025​.

(commercial at 9:03)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

090524-Motion-to-Strike-Death-Penalty-Grounds-State-Speedy-Trial-Preventing.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2254bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-the-good-and-the-bad-for-bryan-kohberger-after-the-april-9th-hearing--74685586

However, not everything went the prosecution's way. The judge did grant the defense more time to scrutinize some of the state’s key evidence, particularly DNA and cellphone data that tie Kohberger to the crime scene. These materials were initially withheld or delayed, and the court acknowledged the defense’s right to fully analyze them. The ruling opens the door for further challenges to the state’s forensic evidence in the future. While the case remains on track for trial, the hearing showed that the defense still has leeway to poke holes in the prosecution’s foundation, especially on the scientific evidence front.

The question  is, will they be successful?



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

What happened at Bryan Kohberger's hearing? | Fox News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74685586Wed, 26 Aug 2026 04:30:03 +0000Bobby CapucciAt a recent motions hearing for Bryan Kohberger, the suspect in the University of Idaho student murders, both sides clashed over critical pieces of evidence and the defense’s attempts to challenge the prosecution’s case. The judge denied several of...

However, not everything went the prosecution's way. The judge did grant the defense more time to scrutinize some of the state’s key evidence, particularly DNA and cellphone data that tie Kohberger to the crime scene. These materials were initially withheld or delayed, and the court acknowledged the defense’s right to fully analyze them. The ruling opens the door for further challenges to the state’s forensic evidence in the future. While the case remains on track for trial, the hearing showed that the defense still has leeway to poke holes in the prosecution’s foundation, especially on the scientific evidence front.

The question  is, will they be successful?



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

What happened at Bryan Kohberger's hearing? | Fox News

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1253bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-bryan-kohberger-and-the-april-9th-hearing--74685587

Key topics to be discussed include the admissibility of specific evidence, such as Kohberger's Amazon purchase history, which reportedly shows he bought a Ka-Bar knife months before the murders. The defense seeks to exclude this evidence, arguing it could be misinterpreted and unfairly prejudice the jury. Additionally, the court will consider the relevance of Kohberger's autism spectrum disorder diagnosis concerning death penalty eligibility. Judge Steven Hippler will preside over the proceedings and may issue rulings during the hearing or in subsequent written decisions.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Momentous evidentiary hearings await Bryan Kohberger ahead of Idaho student murder trial

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74685587Wed, 26 Aug 2026 02:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciApril 9, 2025, a two-day pretrial hearing for Bryan Kohberger commenced at 9:00 a.m. Mountain Time in Boise, Idaho. Kohberger, a former criminal justice graduate student at Washington State University, is accused of the November 2022 stabbing deaths...

Key topics to be discussed include the admissibility of specific evidence, such as Kohberger's Amazon purchase history, which reportedly shows he bought a Ka-Bar knife months before the murders. The defense seeks to exclude this evidence, arguing it could be misinterpreted and unfairly prejudice the jury. Additionally, the court will consider the relevance of Kohberger's autism spectrum disorder diagnosis concerning death penalty eligibility. Judge Steven Hippler will preside over the proceedings and may issue rulings during the hearing or in subsequent written decisions.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Momentous evidentiary hearings await Bryan Kohberger ahead of Idaho student murder trial

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1042bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcripts-day-1-part-8-8-25-26--74683026
The defense spent much of the first day attacking the manner in which the prosecution was getting its evidence into the record rather than attempting to disprove the entire prosecution theory at that stage. Kathryn Nester and Robinson’s attorneys repeatedly raised hearsay, foundation and authentication objections, arguing that investigators were being permitted to introduce reports, statements and records created by other people without those individuals appearing personally to testify. Judge Graf overruled most of those objections, reflecting the substantially lower evidentiary threshold governing a Utah preliminary hearing, whose purpose was only to determine whether probable cause existed to send Robinson to trial rather than whether prosecutors could prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. One significant exception involved an edited compilation of surveillance footage, which Graf declined to admit in that form and required prosecutors to replace with the underlying unedited material. Hull’s testimony also revealed the scope of the prosecution’s surveillance theory: investigators claimed Robinson had appeared on or around the UVU campus multiple times on September 10 and that they were attempting to stitch those appearances together into a continuous identification of the alleged shooter. By the end of day one, prosecutors had established the killing itself, the medical cause of Kirk’s death, the existence and authenticity of substantial video evidence and the beginnings of their effort to identify Robinson as the person captured in that footage. They had not yet presented many of the pieces expected to become more consequential later in the hearing, including the rifle and DNA evidence, Robinson’s alleged communications and admissions, and testimony concerning his roommate Lance Twiggs.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74683026Wed, 26 Aug 2026 00:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay one of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing on July 6, 2026, largely centered on prosecutors beginning to construct a timeline of Charlie Kirk’s killing at Utah Valley University and establishing the authenticity of the surveillance footage and...
The defense spent much of the first day attacking the manner in which the prosecution was getting its evidence into the record rather than attempting to disprove the entire prosecution theory at that stage. Kathryn Nester and Robinson’s attorneys repeatedly raised hearsay, foundation and authentication objections, arguing that investigators were being permitted to introduce reports, statements and records created by other people without those individuals appearing personally to testify. Judge Graf overruled most of those objections, reflecting the substantially lower evidentiary threshold governing a Utah preliminary hearing, whose purpose was only to determine whether probable cause existed to send Robinson to trial rather than whether prosecutors could prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. One significant exception involved an edited compilation of surveillance footage, which Graf declined to admit in that form and required prosecutors to replace with the underlying unedited material. Hull’s testimony also revealed the scope of the prosecution’s surveillance theory: investigators claimed Robinson had appeared on or around the UVU campus multiple times on September 10 and that they were attempting to stitch those appearances together into a continuous identification of the alleged shooter. By the end of day one, prosecutors had established the killing itself, the medical cause of Kirk’s death, the existence and authenticity of substantial video evidence and the beginnings of their effort to identify Robinson as the person captured in that footage. They had not yet presented many of the pieces expected to become more consequential later in the hearing, including the rifle and DNA evidence, Robinson’s alleged communications and admissions, and testimony concerning his roommate Lance Twiggs.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>772breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/bill-clinton-and-the-transcript-from-his-epstein-related-interview-with-congress-part-2-8-25-26--74652972Bill Clinton’s February 27, 2026 testimony before the House Oversight Committee finally forced him to answer under oath about a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that had generated questions for decades, but the proceeding hardly delivered the kind of exhaustive accounting the public had been promised. Clinton insisted that he had “done nothing wrong,” knew nothing about Epstein’s abuse and never witnessed anything that caused him concern, effectively asking lawmakers to accept that his repeated contact with Epstein, travel aboard Epstein’s aircraft and proximity to Ghislaine Maxwell never exposed him to anything suspicious. That explanation deserved considerably more scrutiny than it received. Clinton had not volunteered for the deposition either. He resisted the committee’s subpoena, failed to appear for a scheduled January 13 deposition and only agreed to testify after a bipartisan contempt resolution advanced against him. Yet when he finally appeared, even some lawmakers who had spent months demanding answers quickly described him as cooperative and candid. The central problem remained unresolved: Clinton’s defense depended heavily on what he claimed not to have seen, not to have known and not to remember, while the documentary record established that his association with Epstein was substantial enough to demand far more than a polite acceptance of those denials.

The congressional process itself also exposed the weaknesses that have plagued nearly every official examination of Epstein’s network. Rather than methodically reconstructing Clinton’s relationship with Epstein against flight records, photographs, visitor records, witness accounts and contemporaneous communications, the deposition became entangled in the same partisan warfare that repeatedly consumes the Epstein investigation. Republicans emphasized Clinton while Democrats complained that Donald Trump had not been subpoenaed, and Chairman James Comer immediately used Clinton’s answers to make political claims about Trump rather than keeping the focus exclusively on Epstein and the unanswered questions surrounding Clinton himself. Clinton’s testimony therefore produced another familiar outcome: a powerful person denied knowledge of Epstein’s crimes, lawmakers divided themselves into political camps, and very little was done to independently test how plausible those denials actually were. Clinton’s appearance was historically significant because Congress compelled a former president to testify, but significance should not be confused with accountability. After years of questions about one of the most prominent men in Epstein’s orbit, the public was still largely left with Clinton’s version of events and a congressional process that appeared more interested in scoring partisan points than aggressively determining whether that version could withstand sustained scrutiny.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74652972Tue, 25 Aug 2026 22:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBill Clinton’s February 27, 2026 testimony before the House Oversight Committee finally forced him to answer under oath about a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that had generated questions for decades, but the proceeding hardly delivered the kind of...Bill Clinton’s February 27, 2026 testimony before the House Oversight Committee finally forced him to answer under oath about a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that had generated questions for decades, but the proceeding hardly delivered the kind of exhaustive accounting the public had been promised. Clinton insisted that he had “done nothing wrong,” knew nothing about Epstein’s abuse and never witnessed anything that caused him concern, effectively asking lawmakers to accept that his repeated contact with Epstein, travel aboard Epstein’s aircraft and proximity to Ghislaine Maxwell never exposed him to anything suspicious. That explanation deserved considerably more scrutiny than it received. Clinton had not volunteered for the deposition either. He resisted the committee’s subpoena, failed to appear for a scheduled January 13 deposition and only agreed to testify after a bipartisan contempt resolution advanced against him. Yet when he finally appeared, even some lawmakers who had spent months demanding answers quickly described him as cooperative and candid. The central problem remained unresolved: Clinton’s defense depended heavily on what he claimed not to have seen, not to have known and not to remember, while the documentary record established that his association with Epstein was substantial enough to demand far more than a polite acceptance of those denials.

The congressional process itself also exposed the weaknesses that have plagued nearly every official examination of Epstein’s network. Rather than methodically reconstructing Clinton’s relationship with Epstein against flight records, photographs, visitor records, witness accounts and contemporaneous communications, the deposition became entangled in the same partisan warfare that repeatedly consumes the Epstein investigation. Republicans emphasized Clinton while Democrats complained that Donald Trump had not been subpoenaed, and Chairman James Comer immediately used Clinton’s answers to make political claims about Trump rather than keeping the focus exclusively on Epstein and the unanswered questions surrounding Clinton himself. Clinton’s testimony therefore produced another familiar outcome: a powerful person denied knowledge of Epstein’s crimes, lawmakers divided themselves into political camps, and very little was done to independently test how plausible those denials actually were. Clinton’s appearance was historically significant because Congress compelled a former president to testify, but significance should not be confused with accountability. After years of questions about one of the most prominent men in Epstein’s orbit, the public was still largely left with Clinton’s version of events and a congressional process that appeared more interested in scoring partisan points than aggressively determining whether that version could withstand sustained scrutiny.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>709epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/bill-clinton-and-the-transcript-from-his-epstein-related-interview-with-congress-part-1-8-25-26--74652971Bill Clinton’s February 27, 2026 testimony before the House Oversight Committee finally forced him to answer under oath about a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that had generated questions for decades, but the proceeding hardly delivered the kind of exhaustive accounting the public had been promised. Clinton insisted that he had “done nothing wrong,” knew nothing about Epstein’s abuse and never witnessed anything that caused him concern, effectively asking lawmakers to accept that his repeated contact with Epstein, travel aboard Epstein’s aircraft and proximity to Ghislaine Maxwell never exposed him to anything suspicious. That explanation deserved considerably more scrutiny than it received. Clinton had not volunteered for the deposition either. He resisted the committee’s subpoena, failed to appear for a scheduled January 13 deposition and only agreed to testify after a bipartisan contempt resolution advanced against him. Yet when he finally appeared, even some lawmakers who had spent months demanding answers quickly described him as cooperative and candid. The central problem remained unresolved: Clinton’s defense depended heavily on what he claimed not to have seen, not to have known and not to remember, while the documentary record established that his association with Epstein was substantial enough to demand far more than a polite acceptance of those denials.

The congressional process itself also exposed the weaknesses that have plagued nearly every official examination of Epstein’s network. Rather than methodically reconstructing Clinton’s relationship with Epstein against flight records, photographs, visitor records, witness accounts and contemporaneous communications, the deposition became entangled in the same partisan warfare that repeatedly consumes the Epstein investigation. Republicans emphasized Clinton while Democrats complained that Donald Trump had not been subpoenaed, and Chairman James Comer immediately used Clinton’s answers to make political claims about Trump rather than keeping the focus exclusively on Epstein and the unanswered questions surrounding Clinton himself. Clinton’s testimony therefore produced another familiar outcome: a powerful person denied knowledge of Epstein’s crimes, lawmakers divided themselves into political camps, and very little was done to independently test how plausible those denials actually were. Clinton’s appearance was historically significant because Congress compelled a former president to testify, but significance should not be confused with accountability. After years of questions about one of the most prominent men in Epstein’s orbit, the public was still largely left with Clinton’s version of events and a congressional process that appeared more interested in scoring partisan points than aggressively determining whether that version could withstand sustained scrutiny.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74652971Tue, 25 Aug 2026 20:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBill Clinton’s February 27, 2026 testimony before the House Oversight Committee finally forced him to answer under oath about a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that had generated questions for decades, but the proceeding hardly delivered the kind of...Bill Clinton’s February 27, 2026 testimony before the House Oversight Committee finally forced him to answer under oath about a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein that had generated questions for decades, but the proceeding hardly delivered the kind of exhaustive accounting the public had been promised. Clinton insisted that he had “done nothing wrong,” knew nothing about Epstein’s abuse and never witnessed anything that caused him concern, effectively asking lawmakers to accept that his repeated contact with Epstein, travel aboard Epstein’s aircraft and proximity to Ghislaine Maxwell never exposed him to anything suspicious. That explanation deserved considerably more scrutiny than it received. Clinton had not volunteered for the deposition either. He resisted the committee’s subpoena, failed to appear for a scheduled January 13 deposition and only agreed to testify after a bipartisan contempt resolution advanced against him. Yet when he finally appeared, even some lawmakers who had spent months demanding answers quickly described him as cooperative and candid. The central problem remained unresolved: Clinton’s defense depended heavily on what he claimed not to have seen, not to have known and not to remember, while the documentary record established that his association with Epstein was substantial enough to demand far more than a polite acceptance of those denials.

The congressional process itself also exposed the weaknesses that have plagued nearly every official examination of Epstein’s network. Rather than methodically reconstructing Clinton’s relationship with Epstein against flight records, photographs, visitor records, witness accounts and contemporaneous communications, the deposition became entangled in the same partisan warfare that repeatedly consumes the Epstein investigation. Republicans emphasized Clinton while Democrats complained that Donald Trump had not been subpoenaed, and Chairman James Comer immediately used Clinton’s answers to make political claims about Trump rather than keeping the focus exclusively on Epstein and the unanswered questions surrounding Clinton himself. Clinton’s testimony therefore produced another familiar outcome: a powerful person denied knowledge of Epstein’s crimes, lawmakers divided themselves into political camps, and very little was done to independently test how plausible those denials actually were. Clinton’s appearance was historically significant because Congress compelled a former president to testify, but significance should not be confused with accountability. After years of questions about one of the most prominent men in Epstein’s orbit, the public was still largely left with Clinton’s version of events and a congressional process that appeared more interested in scoring partisan points than aggressively determining whether that version could withstand sustained scrutiny.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>765epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/martin-nowak-jeffrey-epstein-and-the-questions-harvard-still-hasn-t-answered-8-25-26--74652974
The documents also showed that Epstein’s relationship with Harvard was useful to him for reasons that went far beyond an interest in science. Epstein spent years using his connections to prestigious academics and institutions to rehabilitate his reputation, particularly as damaging information about his criminal conduct increasingly dominated internet searches for his name. His own websites prominently advertised his support for Nowak’s program, claiming Epstein had provided as much as $30 million, while Harvard has said the actual figure was approximately $6.5 million. More revealingly, Epstein’s publicist explicitly asked Nowak’s laboratory in 2014 to create a page about Epstein on Harvard’s website because having his name attached to a Harvard.edu address would improve his Google results, and Nowak agreed. The newer documents also suggested Harvard’s previous internal examination of Epstein’s ties to the university was incomplete, including evidence indicating Epstein may have visited campus later than Harvard had previously disclosed. What emerged was therefore bigger than one strange email: Epstein had successfully turned Harvard’s prestige, its professors and its scientific programs into valuable pieces of his post-conviction reputation-management operation, and years later the university was still being forced to account for how extensively he had been allowed to do it.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Harvard Still Employs Professor Whose Emails with Epstein Mentioned Spies And Torture

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74652974Tue, 25 Aug 2026 18:30:04 +0000Bobby CapucciThe newly released Epstein records have put Harvard professor Martin Nowak back under intense scrutiny, not simply because of a bizarre 2014 email exchange about a “captured spy” and “torture,” but because the correspondence sits inside a much larger...
The documents also showed that Epstein’s relationship with Harvard was useful to him for reasons that went far beyond an interest in science. Epstein spent years using his connections to prestigious academics and institutions to rehabilitate his reputation, particularly as damaging information about his criminal conduct increasingly dominated internet searches for his name. His own websites prominently advertised his support for Nowak’s program, claiming Epstein had provided as much as $30 million, while Harvard has said the actual figure was approximately $6.5 million. More revealingly, Epstein’s publicist explicitly asked Nowak’s laboratory in 2014 to create a page about Epstein on Harvard’s website because having his name attached to a Harvard.edu address would improve his Google results, and Nowak agreed. The newer documents also suggested Harvard’s previous internal examination of Epstein’s ties to the university was incomplete, including evidence indicating Epstein may have visited campus later than Harvard had previously disclosed. What emerged was therefore bigger than one strange email: Epstein had successfully turned Harvard’s prestige, its professors and its scientific programs into valuable pieces of his post-conviction reputation-management operation, and years later the university was still being forced to account for how extensively he had been allowed to do it.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Harvard Still Employs Professor Whose Emails with Epstein Mentioned Spies And Torture

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>838epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-how-bryan-kohberger-s-mental-health-could-shape-his-legal-future-8-25-26--74682989
The diagnoses could become more significant, however, because Kohberger was now seeking to withdraw his guilty plea through post-conviction proceedings, arguing that his attorneys inadequately represented him and manipulated him into accepting the deal that spared him from execution. Legal experts said his mental-health conditions might become relevant if Kohberger could show that they affected his ability to understand the plea, process the alternatives presented by his attorneys or make decisions under intense pressure, although the evaluations themselves did not establish that this actually occurred. If Kohberger somehow succeeded in withdrawing his plea and proceeded to trial, experts said the diagnoses would probably have little relevance during the guilt phase because autism, ADHD and OCD do not determine whether he committed the charged crimes. Their greatest potential significance would come at sentencing if he were convicted and prosecutors again pursued the death penalty, when jurors could consider his neurological and psychological conditions as mitigating evidence. Kohberger therefore faced a substantial legal hurdle: the existence of the diagnoses was documented, but he would still have to demonstrate that they materially affected the validity of the guilty plea he knowingly entered in court.






to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

How Bryan Kohberger’s Diagnoses Could Impact Possible Trial, Sentencing - Newsweek

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74682989Tue, 25 Aug 2026 16:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciNewly unsealed court records revealed that Bryan Kohberger underwent an extensive neuropsychological evaluation before pleading guilty to the November 2022 murders of University of Idaho students Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and...
The diagnoses could become more significant, however, because Kohberger was now seeking to withdraw his guilty plea through post-conviction proceedings, arguing that his attorneys inadequately represented him and manipulated him into accepting the deal that spared him from execution. Legal experts said his mental-health conditions might become relevant if Kohberger could show that they affected his ability to understand the plea, process the alternatives presented by his attorneys or make decisions under intense pressure, although the evaluations themselves did not establish that this actually occurred. If Kohberger somehow succeeded in withdrawing his plea and proceeded to trial, experts said the diagnoses would probably have little relevance during the guilt phase because autism, ADHD and OCD do not determine whether he committed the charged crimes. Their greatest potential significance would come at sentencing if he were convicted and prosecutors again pursued the death penalty, when jurors could consider his neurological and psychological conditions as mitigating evidence. Kohberger therefore faced a substantial legal hurdle: the existence of the diagnoses was documented, but he would still have to demonstrate that they materially affected the validity of the guilty plea he knowingly entered in court.






to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

How Bryan Kohberger’s Diagnoses Could Impact Possible Trial, Sentencing - Newsweek

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>846bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/scotland-yard-s-mandelson-probe-hits-an-epstein-files-roadblock-8-25-26--74652973The Metropolitan Police investigation into whether Peter Mandelson improperly shared confidential, potentially market-sensitive government information with Jeffrey Epstein had reportedly stalled because British investigators still did not have access to the unredacted Epstein files held by U.S. authorities. Scotland Yard had initially sought the material through informal law-enforcement channels before escalating the request into a formal mutual legal assistance process, which could take as long as a year and still offered no guarantee that the Justice Department would turn over everything investigators wanted. Mandelson, who had served as business secretary and later as Britain’s ambassador to the United States, was arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office on February 23, 2026, and his properties were searched. Investigators were examining allegations that he had passed sensitive information to Epstein while in government, although Mandelson had denied wrongdoing.

Concerns were now growing that the investigation could ultimately collapse if Scotland Yard could not obtain the unredacted records, which were considered potentially crucial to determining exactly what Mandelson communicated to Epstein and whether any criminal offense had occurred. Detectives could still attempt to build a case through interviews with former politicians and officials, but the missing U.S. material appeared to represent a significant evidentiary gap. Reports suggested that the Trump administration was reluctant to release files that might generate additional political fallout, although the Justice Department denied refusing cooperation and said both countries were required to follow established legal procedures governing international evidence sharing. The controversy therefore placed the Mandelson investigation inside the larger dispute over Epstein transparency: even after millions of pages had been released, redactions and unreleased material remained capable of directly affecting active criminal investigations outside the United States.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


Fears for Mandelson investigation as Met still doesn’t have unredacted Epstein files | The Independent

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74652973Tue, 25 Aug 2026 14:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe Metropolitan Police investigation into whether Peter Mandelson improperly shared confidential, potentially market-sensitive government information with Jeffrey Epstein had reportedly stalled because British investigators still did not have access...The Metropolitan Police investigation into whether Peter Mandelson improperly shared confidential, potentially market-sensitive government information with Jeffrey Epstein had reportedly stalled because British investigators still did not have access to the unredacted Epstein files held by U.S. authorities. Scotland Yard had initially sought the material through informal law-enforcement channels before escalating the request into a formal mutual legal assistance process, which could take as long as a year and still offered no guarantee that the Justice Department would turn over everything investigators wanted. Mandelson, who had served as business secretary and later as Britain’s ambassador to the United States, was arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office on February 23, 2026, and his properties were searched. Investigators were examining allegations that he had passed sensitive information to Epstein while in government, although Mandelson had denied wrongdoing.

Concerns were now growing that the investigation could ultimately collapse if Scotland Yard could not obtain the unredacted records, which were considered potentially crucial to determining exactly what Mandelson communicated to Epstein and whether any criminal offense had occurred. Detectives could still attempt to build a case through interviews with former politicians and officials, but the missing U.S. material appeared to represent a significant evidentiary gap. Reports suggested that the Trump administration was reluctant to release files that might generate additional political fallout, although the Justice Department denied refusing cooperation and said both countries were required to follow established legal procedures governing international evidence sharing. The controversy therefore placed the Mandelson investigation inside the larger dispute over Epstein transparency: even after millions of pages had been released, redactions and unreleased material remained capable of directly affecting active criminal investigations outside the United States.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


Fears for Mandelson investigation as Met still doesn’t have unredacted Epstein files | The Independent

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>652epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/todd-blanche-under-fire-as-epstein-records-report-fails-to-surface-8-25-26--74652970
The controversy also reinforced suspicions among lawmakers that the government’s Epstein disclosures remained incomplete despite repeated promises of transparency. Critics argued that without the missing report, Congress and the public had no meaningful way to determine the scope of the unreleased material or evaluate the Justice Department’s justification for continuing to withhold it. Blanche and the department faced mounting pressure to explain whether records were being withheld because of victim privacy, ongoing legal restrictions, investigative concerns or some other reason, while Democrats pushing the issue warned that failure to comply could carry legal consequences. The fight therefore moved beyond another argument over the so-called Epstein files and became a broader question of congressional oversight: whether the Justice Department could be compelled to provide a complete accounting of what it possessed and whether senior officials could face consequences if they refused.



to contat me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74652970Tue, 25 Aug 2026 13:33:18 +0000Bobby CapucciTed Lieu accused Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche of potentially violating federal law after the Justice Department failed to produce a congressionally required report explaining what Epstein-related records remained withheld from public release....
The controversy also reinforced suspicions among lawmakers that the government’s Epstein disclosures remained incomplete despite repeated promises of transparency. Critics argued that without the missing report, Congress and the public had no meaningful way to determine the scope of the unreleased material or evaluate the Justice Department’s justification for continuing to withhold it. Blanche and the department faced mounting pressure to explain whether records were being withheld because of victim privacy, ongoing legal restrictions, investigative concerns or some other reason, while Democrats pushing the issue warned that failure to comply could carry legal consequences. The fight therefore moved beyond another argument over the so-called Epstein files and became a broader question of congressional oversight: whether the Justice Department could be compelled to provide a complete accounting of what it possessed and whether senior officials could face consequences if they refused.



to contat me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>629epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-heated-debate-surrounding-the-murder-scene-in-moscow-8-25-26--74652727The Goncalves family had argued that jurors in Bryan Kohberger’s case should have been allowed to visit 1122 King Road, the Moscow, Idaho, house where Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin were murdered. The family believed photographs, diagrams and video could never fully convey the layout of the home, the distances between rooms, the stairways, sight lines and the physical relationship between the bedrooms and common areas. From their perspective, those details could have mattered enormously once jurors were asked to evaluate the prosecution’s timeline, Dylan Mortensen’s account of seeing a masked man, the movement of the killer through the house and the defense’s inevitable challenges to how the State said the murders unfolded. Keeping the house standing, they argued, would have preserved the possibility that the judge could later decide a jury view was necessary.


That possibility disappeared when the University of Idaho moved forward with demolition of the house in December 2023, well before Kohberger ever went to trial. Prosecutors and defense attorneys had both indicated they did not object to the demolition after investigators conducted additional measurements, photographs, scans and other documentation of the property, but the Goncalves family strongly objected and publicly pleaded for the house to remain standing until the criminal case was finished. The university nevertheless demolished 1122 King Road on December 28, 2023, saying the building no longer served an investigative purpose and that removing it was part of the community’s effort to heal. The decision was irreversible: by the time the case progressed toward trial, jurors could no longer be taken through the actual crime scene even if a judge later concluded that seeing it firsthand would have been useful. For the Goncalves family, that was precisely the problem—they believed potentially important evidence had effectively been erased before anyone could know what questions would arise once the prosecution and defense finally presented their competing versions of what happened inside the house.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com









Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74652727Tue, 25 Aug 2026 10:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe Goncalves family had argued that jurors in Bryan Kohberger’s case should have been allowed to visit 1122 King Road, the Moscow, Idaho, house where Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin were murdered. The family believed...The Goncalves family had argued that jurors in Bryan Kohberger’s case should have been allowed to visit 1122 King Road, the Moscow, Idaho, house where Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin were murdered. The family believed photographs, diagrams and video could never fully convey the layout of the home, the distances between rooms, the stairways, sight lines and the physical relationship between the bedrooms and common areas. From their perspective, those details could have mattered enormously once jurors were asked to evaluate the prosecution’s timeline, Dylan Mortensen’s account of seeing a masked man, the movement of the killer through the house and the defense’s inevitable challenges to how the State said the murders unfolded. Keeping the house standing, they argued, would have preserved the possibility that the judge could later decide a jury view was necessary.


That possibility disappeared when the University of Idaho moved forward with demolition of the house in December 2023, well before Kohberger ever went to trial. Prosecutors and defense attorneys had both indicated they did not object to the demolition after investigators conducted additional measurements, photographs, scans and other documentation of the property, but the Goncalves family strongly objected and publicly pleaded for the house to remain standing until the criminal case was finished. The university nevertheless demolished 1122 King Road on December 28, 2023, saying the building no longer served an investigative purpose and that removing it was part of the community’s effort to heal. The decision was irreversible: by the time the case progressed toward trial, jurors could no longer be taken through the actual crime scene even if a judge later concluded that seeing it firsthand would have been useful. For the Goncalves family, that was precisely the problem—they believed potentially important evidence had effectively been erased before anyone could know what questions would arise once the prosecution and defense finally presented their competing versions of what happened inside the house.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com









Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2249bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-idaho-responds-to-kohberger-s-attempt-to-exclude-igg-results-8-25-26--74652726

The State also rejected the defense argument that Kohberger’s constitutional rights had been violated by investigators searching genetic genealogy databases. Prosecutors argued that Kohberger had no reasonable expectation of privacy in DNA information voluntarily uploaded by distant relatives to third-party genealogy services and therefore lacked standing to challenge those searches on their behalf. They further maintained that even if the court found some problem with the IGG investigation, suppression still would not automatically follow because investigators had developed additional evidence linking Kohberger to the crime and ultimately obtained his own DNA through lawful means. The prosecution’s position was essentially that IGG helped generate a name, not courtroom evidence, and that the defense was attempting to transform a genealogical lead into a Fourth Amendment violation capable of excluding the later DNA comparison.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74652726Tue, 25 Aug 2026 08:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciThe State opposed Bryan Kohberger’s effort to suppress evidence connected to investigative genetic genealogy, arguing that the IGG process had functioned only as an investigative lead and had not produced the DNA evidence prosecutors ultimately...

The State also rejected the defense argument that Kohberger’s constitutional rights had been violated by investigators searching genetic genealogy databases. Prosecutors argued that Kohberger had no reasonable expectation of privacy in DNA information voluntarily uploaded by distant relatives to third-party genealogy services and therefore lacked standing to challenge those searches on their behalf. They further maintained that even if the court found some problem with the IGG investigation, suppression still would not automatically follow because investigators had developed additional evidence linking Kohberger to the crime and ultimately obtained his own DNA through lawful means. The prosecution’s position was essentially that IGG helped generate a name, not courtroom evidence, and that the defense was attempting to transform a genealogical lead into a Fourth Amendment violation capable of excluding the later DNA comparison.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2523bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-the-3rd-motion-to-compel-discovery-8-24-26--74652724
The most consequential portion of the motion concerned investigative genetic genealogy, the process investigators used after the sheath DNA failed to produce a traditional CODIS identification. Kohberger’s attorneys demanded the genealogy records behind the investigation, including DNA data uploaded to genealogy services, search results, family trees, communications, additional samples collected during the genealogy investigation and information identifying genetic relatives who had appeared as potential matches. The defense maintained that it needed this material to examine the reliability and legality of the process that ultimately helped investigators focus on Kohberger, while prosecutors sought a protective order limiting disclosure of some of the genealogy information because it involved private individuals who had never been suspects. The dispute eventually required extensive briefing, expert declarations and a hearing before Judge John Judge, who ultimately ordered prosecutors to submit certain IGG materials to the court for an in camera review. The third motion to compel therefore became one of the earliest major battles over whether the defense would be permitted to look behind the State’s finished DNA evidence and scrutinize the investigative process that had helped lead authorities to Kohberger in the first place.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74652724Tue, 25 Aug 2026 06:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBryan Kohberger’s defense filed its third motion to compel discovery in June 2023, arguing that prosecutors had still not turned over important material connected primarily to the DNA investigation. The defense sought records concerning every DNA...
The most consequential portion of the motion concerned investigative genetic genealogy, the process investigators used after the sheath DNA failed to produce a traditional CODIS identification. Kohberger’s attorneys demanded the genealogy records behind the investigation, including DNA data uploaded to genealogy services, search results, family trees, communications, additional samples collected during the genealogy investigation and information identifying genetic relatives who had appeared as potential matches. The defense maintained that it needed this material to examine the reliability and legality of the process that ultimately helped investigators focus on Kohberger, while prosecutors sought a protective order limiting disclosure of some of the genealogy information because it involved private individuals who had never been suspects. The dispute eventually required extensive briefing, expert declarations and a hearing before Judge John Judge, who ultimately ordered prosecutors to submit certain IGG materials to the court for an in camera review. The third motion to compel therefore became one of the earliest major battles over whether the defense would be permitted to look behind the State’s finished DNA evidence and scrutinize the investigative process that had helped lead authorities to Kohberger in the first place.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2896bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-bryan-kohberger-and-the-compelling-evidence-collected-against-him--74652942
Legal experts discussing the search at the time cautioned that the most visually dramatic items were not necessarily the most incriminating. A knife, gun or black mask could be perfectly lawful possessions unless investigators could establish some connection to the murders, while seemingly mundane objects could become far more important if they contained blood, DNA, fibers or other trace evidence. Investigators therefore sought to determine whether anything seized from Kohberger or his parents’ home could be scientifically linked to the victims or 1122 King Road. The search was one part of a much larger effort that also included Kohberger’s vehicle, his Pullman apartment, his office and electronic records. At that early stage of the prosecution, the importance of the Pennsylvania evidence remained uncertain, but the seizure illustrated how aggressively investigators were working to find physical evidence that could corroborate the DNA, cellphone, surveillance and vehicle evidence already being assembled against Kohberger.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74652942Tue, 25 Aug 2026 04:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciWhen investigators searched the Kohberger family home in Albrightsville, Pennsylvania, following Bryan Kohberger’s December 2022 arrest, they seized an assortment of items that investigators believed could potentially be connected to the murders of...
Legal experts discussing the search at the time cautioned that the most visually dramatic items were not necessarily the most incriminating. A knife, gun or black mask could be perfectly lawful possessions unless investigators could establish some connection to the murders, while seemingly mundane objects could become far more important if they contained blood, DNA, fibers or other trace evidence. Investigators therefore sought to determine whether anything seized from Kohberger or his parents’ home could be scientifically linked to the victims or 1122 King Road. The search was one part of a much larger effort that also included Kohberger’s vehicle, his Pullman apartment, his office and electronic records. At that early stage of the prosecution, the importance of the Pennsylvania evidence remained uncertain, but the seizure illustrated how aggressively investigators were working to find physical evidence that could corroborate the DNA, cellphone, surveillance and vehicle evidence already being assembled against Kohberger.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>774bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-scott-peterson-s-former-lawyer-and-his-take-on-the-kohberger-case--74585117Lara Yeretsian, a former member of Scott Peterson’s defense team, argued shortly after Bryan Kohberger’s arrest that the evidence publicly outlined against him was far from airtight and that his attorneys would have opportunities to challenge virtually every major component of the state’s case. She focused first on surviving roommate Dylan Mortensen’s description of seeing a masked man dressed in black leaving the house, noting that Mortensen had described characteristics such as height, build and “bushy eyebrows” but had not actually identified Kohberger as the person she saw. Yeretsian emphasized that this was circumstantial evidence and said the defense would be expected to attack each piece individually rather than accept the prosecution’s narrative as a complete picture.









Yeretsian was particularly skeptical of the DNA and cellphone evidence. She argued that DNA found on the knife sheath could potentially be challenged on issues such as transfer, contamination, when the DNA had been deposited, or the reliability of the testing, and she expected the defense to employ its own experts to scrutinize those questions. She was even more dismissive of the cellphone records showing that Kohberger’s phone had connected to towers serving the area near the victims’ home on at least 12 prior occasions, arguing that tower coverage was broad and could not establish that he had actually been at the King Road residence. Her broader point was not that Kohberger had been proven innocent, but that the probable-cause affidavit contained largely circumstantial evidence that competent defense attorneys could attempt to weaken piece by piece, particularly if prosecutors tried to make individual data points appear more precise or conclusive than they actually were.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74585117Tue, 25 Aug 2026 02:30:01 +0000Bobby CapucciLara Yeretsian, a former member of Scott Peterson’s defense team, argued shortly after Bryan Kohberger’s arrest that the evidence publicly outlined against him was far from airtight and that his attorneys would have opportunities to challenge...Lara Yeretsian, a former member of Scott Peterson’s defense team, argued shortly after Bryan Kohberger’s arrest that the evidence publicly outlined against him was far from airtight and that his attorneys would have opportunities to challenge virtually every major component of the state’s case. She focused first on surviving roommate Dylan Mortensen’s description of seeing a masked man dressed in black leaving the house, noting that Mortensen had described characteristics such as height, build and “bushy eyebrows” but had not actually identified Kohberger as the person she saw. Yeretsian emphasized that this was circumstantial evidence and said the defense would be expected to attack each piece individually rather than accept the prosecution’s narrative as a complete picture.









Yeretsian was particularly skeptical of the DNA and cellphone evidence. She argued that DNA found on the knife sheath could potentially be challenged on issues such as transfer, contamination, when the DNA had been deposited, or the reliability of the testing, and she expected the defense to employ its own experts to scrutinize those questions. She was even more dismissive of the cellphone records showing that Kohberger’s phone had connected to towers serving the area near the victims’ home on at least 12 prior occasions, arguing that tower coverage was broad and could not establish that he had actually been at the King Road residence. Her broader point was not that Kohberger had been proven innocent, but that the probable-cause affidavit contained largely circumstantial evidence that competent defense attorneys could attempt to weaken piece by piece, particularly if prosecutors tried to make individual data points appear more precise or conclusive than they actually were.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>928bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-report-and-recommendation-to-allow-the-survivor-suit-against-the-fbi-to-proceed-part-4-8-24-26--74596489A federal magistrate judge recommended denying the government’s attempt to throw out a negligence lawsuit brought by numerous Jeffrey Epstein survivors against the United States over the FBI’s handling of warnings about Epstein stretching back decades. The women alleged that the bureau repeatedly failed to act on credible reports, beginning with Maria Farmer’s 1996 complaint that Epstein had sexually assaulted her, possessed child sexual abuse material and was abusing and trafficking young girls. The complaint also alleged that additional tips and red flags were ignored between 1996 and 2005, that another survivor’s allegations were left largely untouched for years, and that the FBI’s later Florida investigation was riddled with failures, including not interviewing all known victims, not collecting all available corroborating evidence and not properly pursuing reports of suspicious financial activity. The survivors further alleged that after the 2007 non-prosecution agreement effectively ended the federal case, FBI agents continued sending letters telling victims that the matter was still under investigation, creating the impression that federal authorities were continuing to pursue Epstein when they were not. They argued that these failures created a foreseeable risk that Epstein would continue abusing women and girls, and sought $320 million in compensatory damages under the Federal Tort Claims Act.

The government argued that the case should be dismissed on several grounds, including sovereign immunity, the discretionary-function exception, the statute of limitations and alleged defects in the survivors’ administrative claims. Magistrate Judge Ryon McCabe rejected dismissal at this stage, finding that the women had plausibly alleged that FBI agents voluntarily undertook responsibilities toward victims and then failed to exercise reasonable care, particularly in New York and Florida. He also concluded that the survivors had pleaded enough to potentially justify equitable tolling of the limitations period, including allegations that critical information about the FBI’s conduct had been withheld for years and that they did not learn important facts about the government’s failures until much later. McCabe did express skepticism about whether the survivors would ultimately be able to prove that the FBI’s failures legally caused their later abuse, noting that agents themselves could not guarantee prosecution or imprisonment, but he said causation was generally a factual question that should not be resolved on a motion to dismiss. He recommended allowing 90 days of limited discovery into FBI policies and procedures and into administrative-exhaustion questions involving three Jane Does, after which the government could renew parts of its dismissal request. In practical terms, the recommendation kept the heart of the survivors’ case alive and opened the door to discovery into exactly what rules governed the FBI when it received reports about Epstein and what federal agents actually did with those warnings.






to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

epstein-victims-civil-fbi-MTD-report.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74596489Tue, 25 Aug 2026 00:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciA federal magistrate judge recommended denying the government’s attempt to throw out a negligence lawsuit brought by numerous Jeffrey Epstein survivors against the United States over the FBI’s handling of warnings about Epstein stretching back...A federal magistrate judge recommended denying the government’s attempt to throw out a negligence lawsuit brought by numerous Jeffrey Epstein survivors against the United States over the FBI’s handling of warnings about Epstein stretching back decades. The women alleged that the bureau repeatedly failed to act on credible reports, beginning with Maria Farmer’s 1996 complaint that Epstein had sexually assaulted her, possessed child sexual abuse material and was abusing and trafficking young girls. The complaint also alleged that additional tips and red flags were ignored between 1996 and 2005, that another survivor’s allegations were left largely untouched for years, and that the FBI’s later Florida investigation was riddled with failures, including not interviewing all known victims, not collecting all available corroborating evidence and not properly pursuing reports of suspicious financial activity. The survivors further alleged that after the 2007 non-prosecution agreement effectively ended the federal case, FBI agents continued sending letters telling victims that the matter was still under investigation, creating the impression that federal authorities were continuing to pursue Epstein when they were not. They argued that these failures created a foreseeable risk that Epstein would continue abusing women and girls, and sought $320 million in compensatory damages under the Federal Tort Claims Act.

The government argued that the case should be dismissed on several grounds, including sovereign immunity, the discretionary-function exception, the statute of limitations and alleged defects in the survivors’ administrative claims. Magistrate Judge Ryon McCabe rejected dismissal at this stage, finding that the women had plausibly alleged that FBI agents voluntarily undertook responsibilities toward victims and then failed to exercise reasonable care, particularly in New York and Florida. He also concluded that the survivors had pleaded enough to potentially justify equitable tolling of the limitations period, including allegations that critical information about the FBI’s conduct had been withheld for years and that they did not learn important facts about the government’s failures until much later. McCabe did express skepticism about whether the survivors would ultimately be able to prove that the FBI’s failures legally caused their later abuse, noting that agents themselves could not guarantee prosecution or imprisonment, but he said causation was generally a factual question that should not be resolved on a motion to dismiss. He recommended allowing 90 days of limited discovery into FBI policies and procedures and into administrative-exhaustion questions involving three Jane Does, after which the government could renew parts of its dismissal request. In practical terms, the recommendation kept the heart of the survivors’ case alive and opened the door to discovery into exactly what rules governed the FBI when it received reports about Epstein and what federal agents actually did with those warnings.






to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

epstein-victims-civil-fbi-MTD-report.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>799epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-report-and-recommendation-to-allow-the-survivor-suit-against-the-fbi-to-proceed-part-3-8-24-26--74596488A federal magistrate judge recommended denying the government’s attempt to throw out a negligence lawsuit brought by numerous Jeffrey Epstein survivors against the United States over the FBI’s handling of warnings about Epstein stretching back decades. The women alleged that the bureau repeatedly failed to act on credible reports, beginning with Maria Farmer’s 1996 complaint that Epstein had sexually assaulted her, possessed child sexual abuse material and was abusing and trafficking young girls. The complaint also alleged that additional tips and red flags were ignored between 1996 and 2005, that another survivor’s allegations were left largely untouched for years, and that the FBI’s later Florida investigation was riddled with failures, including not interviewing all known victims, not collecting all available corroborating evidence and not properly pursuing reports of suspicious financial activity. The survivors further alleged that after the 2007 non-prosecution agreement effectively ended the federal case, FBI agents continued sending letters telling victims that the matter was still under investigation, creating the impression that federal authorities were continuing to pursue Epstein when they were not. They argued that these failures created a foreseeable risk that Epstein would continue abusing women and girls, and sought $320 million in compensatory damages under the Federal Tort Claims Act.

The government argued that the case should be dismissed on several grounds, including sovereign immunity, the discretionary-function exception, the statute of limitations and alleged defects in the survivors’ administrative claims. Magistrate Judge Ryon McCabe rejected dismissal at this stage, finding that the women had plausibly alleged that FBI agents voluntarily undertook responsibilities toward victims and then failed to exercise reasonable care, particularly in New York and Florida. He also concluded that the survivors had pleaded enough to potentially justify equitable tolling of the limitations period, including allegations that critical information about the FBI’s conduct had been withheld for years and that they did not learn important facts about the government’s failures until much later. McCabe did express skepticism about whether the survivors would ultimately be able to prove that the FBI’s failures legally caused their later abuse, noting that agents themselves could not guarantee prosecution or imprisonment, but he said causation was generally a factual question that should not be resolved on a motion to dismiss. He recommended allowing 90 days of limited discovery into FBI policies and procedures and into administrative-exhaustion questions involving three Jane Does, after which the government could renew parts of its dismissal request. In practical terms, the recommendation kept the heart of the survivors’ case alive and opened the door to discovery into exactly what rules governed the FBI when it received reports about Epstein and what federal agents actually did with those warnings.






to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

epstein-victims-civil-fbi-MTD-report.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74596488Mon, 24 Aug 2026 22:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciA federal magistrate judge recommended denying the government’s attempt to throw out a negligence lawsuit brought by numerous Jeffrey Epstein survivors against the United States over the FBI’s handling of warnings about Epstein stretching back...A federal magistrate judge recommended denying the government’s attempt to throw out a negligence lawsuit brought by numerous Jeffrey Epstein survivors against the United States over the FBI’s handling of warnings about Epstein stretching back decades. The women alleged that the bureau repeatedly failed to act on credible reports, beginning with Maria Farmer’s 1996 complaint that Epstein had sexually assaulted her, possessed child sexual abuse material and was abusing and trafficking young girls. The complaint also alleged that additional tips and red flags were ignored between 1996 and 2005, that another survivor’s allegations were left largely untouched for years, and that the FBI’s later Florida investigation was riddled with failures, including not interviewing all known victims, not collecting all available corroborating evidence and not properly pursuing reports of suspicious financial activity. The survivors further alleged that after the 2007 non-prosecution agreement effectively ended the federal case, FBI agents continued sending letters telling victims that the matter was still under investigation, creating the impression that federal authorities were continuing to pursue Epstein when they were not. They argued that these failures created a foreseeable risk that Epstein would continue abusing women and girls, and sought $320 million in compensatory damages under the Federal Tort Claims Act.

The government argued that the case should be dismissed on several grounds, including sovereign immunity, the discretionary-function exception, the statute of limitations and alleged defects in the survivors’ administrative claims. Magistrate Judge Ryon McCabe rejected dismissal at this stage, finding that the women had plausibly alleged that FBI agents voluntarily undertook responsibilities toward victims and then failed to exercise reasonable care, particularly in New York and Florida. He also concluded that the survivors had pleaded enough to potentially justify equitable tolling of the limitations period, including allegations that critical information about the FBI’s conduct had been withheld for years and that they did not learn important facts about the government’s failures until much later. McCabe did express skepticism about whether the survivors would ultimately be able to prove that the FBI’s failures legally caused their later abuse, noting that agents themselves could not guarantee prosecution or imprisonment, but he said causation was generally a factual question that should not be resolved on a motion to dismiss. He recommended allowing 90 days of limited discovery into FBI policies and procedures and into administrative-exhaustion questions involving three Jane Does, after which the government could renew parts of its dismissal request. In practical terms, the recommendation kept the heart of the survivors’ case alive and opened the door to discovery into exactly what rules governed the FBI when it received reports about Epstein and what federal agents actually did with those warnings.






to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

epstein-victims-civil-fbi-MTD-report.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>764epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-report-and-recommendation-to-allow-the-survivor-suit-against-the-fbi-to-proceed-part-2-8-24-26--74596487A federal magistrate judge recommended denying the government’s attempt to throw out a negligence lawsuit brought by numerous Jeffrey Epstein survivors against the United States over the FBI’s handling of warnings about Epstein stretching back decades. The women alleged that the bureau repeatedly failed to act on credible reports, beginning with Maria Farmer’s 1996 complaint that Epstein had sexually assaulted her, possessed child sexual abuse material and was abusing and trafficking young girls. The complaint also alleged that additional tips and red flags were ignored between 1996 and 2005, that another survivor’s allegations were left largely untouched for years, and that the FBI’s later Florida investigation was riddled with failures, including not interviewing all known victims, not collecting all available corroborating evidence and not properly pursuing reports of suspicious financial activity. The survivors further alleged that after the 2007 non-prosecution agreement effectively ended the federal case, FBI agents continued sending letters telling victims that the matter was still under investigation, creating the impression that federal authorities were continuing to pursue Epstein when they were not. They argued that these failures created a foreseeable risk that Epstein would continue abusing women and girls, and sought $320 million in compensatory damages under the Federal Tort Claims Act.

The government argued that the case should be dismissed on several grounds, including sovereign immunity, the discretionary-function exception, the statute of limitations and alleged defects in the survivors’ administrative claims. Magistrate Judge Ryon McCabe rejected dismissal at this stage, finding that the women had plausibly alleged that FBI agents voluntarily undertook responsibilities toward victims and then failed to exercise reasonable care, particularly in New York and Florida. He also concluded that the survivors had pleaded enough to potentially justify equitable tolling of the limitations period, including allegations that critical information about the FBI’s conduct had been withheld for years and that they did not learn important facts about the government’s failures until much later. McCabe did express skepticism about whether the survivors would ultimately be able to prove that the FBI’s failures legally caused their later abuse, noting that agents themselves could not guarantee prosecution or imprisonment, but he said causation was generally a factual question that should not be resolved on a motion to dismiss. He recommended allowing 90 days of limited discovery into FBI policies and procedures and into administrative-exhaustion questions involving three Jane Does, after which the government could renew parts of its dismissal request. In practical terms, the recommendation kept the heart of the survivors’ case alive and opened the door to discovery into exactly what rules governed the FBI when it received reports about Epstein and what federal agents actually did with those warnings.






to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

epstein-victims-civil-fbi-MTD-report.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74596487Mon, 24 Aug 2026 20:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciA federal magistrate judge recommended denying the government’s attempt to throw out a negligence lawsuit brought by numerous Jeffrey Epstein survivors against the United States over the FBI’s handling of warnings about Epstein stretching back...A federal magistrate judge recommended denying the government’s attempt to throw out a negligence lawsuit brought by numerous Jeffrey Epstein survivors against the United States over the FBI’s handling of warnings about Epstein stretching back decades. The women alleged that the bureau repeatedly failed to act on credible reports, beginning with Maria Farmer’s 1996 complaint that Epstein had sexually assaulted her, possessed child sexual abuse material and was abusing and trafficking young girls. The complaint also alleged that additional tips and red flags were ignored between 1996 and 2005, that another survivor’s allegations were left largely untouched for years, and that the FBI’s later Florida investigation was riddled with failures, including not interviewing all known victims, not collecting all available corroborating evidence and not properly pursuing reports of suspicious financial activity. The survivors further alleged that after the 2007 non-prosecution agreement effectively ended the federal case, FBI agents continued sending letters telling victims that the matter was still under investigation, creating the impression that federal authorities were continuing to pursue Epstein when they were not. They argued that these failures created a foreseeable risk that Epstein would continue abusing women and girls, and sought $320 million in compensatory damages under the Federal Tort Claims Act.

The government argued that the case should be dismissed on several grounds, including sovereign immunity, the discretionary-function exception, the statute of limitations and alleged defects in the survivors’ administrative claims. Magistrate Judge Ryon McCabe rejected dismissal at this stage, finding that the women had plausibly alleged that FBI agents voluntarily undertook responsibilities toward victims and then failed to exercise reasonable care, particularly in New York and Florida. He also concluded that the survivors had pleaded enough to potentially justify equitable tolling of the limitations period, including allegations that critical information about the FBI’s conduct had been withheld for years and that they did not learn important facts about the government’s failures until much later. McCabe did express skepticism about whether the survivors would ultimately be able to prove that the FBI’s failures legally caused their later abuse, noting that agents themselves could not guarantee prosecution or imprisonment, but he said causation was generally a factual question that should not be resolved on a motion to dismiss. He recommended allowing 90 days of limited discovery into FBI policies and procedures and into administrative-exhaustion questions involving three Jane Does, after which the government could renew parts of its dismissal request. In practical terms, the recommendation kept the heart of the survivors’ case alive and opened the door to discovery into exactly what rules governed the FBI when it received reports about Epstein and what federal agents actually did with those warnings.






to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

epstein-victims-civil-fbi-MTD-report.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>854epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-report-and-recommendation-to-allow-the-survivor-suit-against-the-fbi-to-proceed-part-1-8-24-26--74596490A federal magistrate judge recommended denying the government’s attempt to throw out a negligence lawsuit brought by numerous Jeffrey Epstein survivors against the United States over the FBI’s handling of warnings about Epstein stretching back decades. The women alleged that the bureau repeatedly failed to act on credible reports, beginning with Maria Farmer’s 1996 complaint that Epstein had sexually assaulted her, possessed child sexual abuse material and was abusing and trafficking young girls. The complaint also alleged that additional tips and red flags were ignored between 1996 and 2005, that another survivor’s allegations were left largely untouched for years, and that the FBI’s later Florida investigation was riddled with failures, including not interviewing all known victims, not collecting all available corroborating evidence and not properly pursuing reports of suspicious financial activity. The survivors further alleged that after the 2007 non-prosecution agreement effectively ended the federal case, FBI agents continued sending letters telling victims that the matter was still under investigation, creating the impression that federal authorities were continuing to pursue Epstein when they were not. They argued that these failures created a foreseeable risk that Epstein would continue abusing women and girls, and sought $320 million in compensatory damages under the Federal Tort Claims Act.

The government argued that the case should be dismissed on several grounds, including sovereign immunity, the discretionary-function exception, the statute of limitations and alleged defects in the survivors’ administrative claims. Magistrate Judge Ryon McCabe rejected dismissal at this stage, finding that the women had plausibly alleged that FBI agents voluntarily undertook responsibilities toward victims and then failed to exercise reasonable care, particularly in New York and Florida. He also concluded that the survivors had pleaded enough to potentially justify equitable tolling of the limitations period, including allegations that critical information about the FBI’s conduct had been withheld for years and that they did not learn important facts about the government’s failures until much later. McCabe did express skepticism about whether the survivors would ultimately be able to prove that the FBI’s failures legally caused their later abuse, noting that agents themselves could not guarantee prosecution or imprisonment, but he said causation was generally a factual question that should not be resolved on a motion to dismiss. He recommended allowing 90 days of limited discovery into FBI policies and procedures and into administrative-exhaustion questions involving three Jane Does, after which the government could renew parts of its dismissal request. In practical terms, the recommendation kept the heart of the survivors’ case alive and opened the door to discovery into exactly what rules governed the FBI when it received reports about Epstein and what federal agents actually did with those warnings.






to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

epstein-victims-civil-fbi-MTD-report.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74596490Mon, 24 Aug 2026 18:30:04 +0000Bobby CapucciA federal magistrate judge recommended denying the government’s attempt to throw out a negligence lawsuit brought by numerous Jeffrey Epstein survivors against the United States over the FBI’s handling of warnings about Epstein stretching back...A federal magistrate judge recommended denying the government’s attempt to throw out a negligence lawsuit brought by numerous Jeffrey Epstein survivors against the United States over the FBI’s handling of warnings about Epstein stretching back decades. The women alleged that the bureau repeatedly failed to act on credible reports, beginning with Maria Farmer’s 1996 complaint that Epstein had sexually assaulted her, possessed child sexual abuse material and was abusing and trafficking young girls. The complaint also alleged that additional tips and red flags were ignored between 1996 and 2005, that another survivor’s allegations were left largely untouched for years, and that the FBI’s later Florida investigation was riddled with failures, including not interviewing all known victims, not collecting all available corroborating evidence and not properly pursuing reports of suspicious financial activity. The survivors further alleged that after the 2007 non-prosecution agreement effectively ended the federal case, FBI agents continued sending letters telling victims that the matter was still under investigation, creating the impression that federal authorities were continuing to pursue Epstein when they were not. They argued that these failures created a foreseeable risk that Epstein would continue abusing women and girls, and sought $320 million in compensatory damages under the Federal Tort Claims Act.

The government argued that the case should be dismissed on several grounds, including sovereign immunity, the discretionary-function exception, the statute of limitations and alleged defects in the survivors’ administrative claims. Magistrate Judge Ryon McCabe rejected dismissal at this stage, finding that the women had plausibly alleged that FBI agents voluntarily undertook responsibilities toward victims and then failed to exercise reasonable care, particularly in New York and Florida. He also concluded that the survivors had pleaded enough to potentially justify equitable tolling of the limitations period, including allegations that critical information about the FBI’s conduct had been withheld for years and that they did not learn important facts about the government’s failures until much later. McCabe did express skepticism about whether the survivors would ultimately be able to prove that the FBI’s failures legally caused their later abuse, noting that agents themselves could not guarantee prosecution or imprisonment, but he said causation was generally a factual question that should not be resolved on a motion to dismiss. He recommended allowing 90 days of limited discovery into FBI policies and procedures and into administrative-exhaustion questions involving three Jane Does, after which the government could renew parts of its dismissal request. In practical terms, the recommendation kept the heart of the survivors’ case alive and opened the door to discovery into exactly what rules governed the FBI when it received reports about Epstein and what federal agents actually did with those warnings.






to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

epstein-victims-civil-fbi-MTD-report.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>723epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-transcripts-day-1-part-7-8-24-26--74465117
The defense spent much of the first day attacking the manner in which the prosecution was getting its evidence into the record rather than attempting to disprove the entire prosecution theory at that stage. Kathryn Nester and Robinson’s attorneys repeatedly raised hearsay, foundation and authentication objections, arguing that investigators were being permitted to introduce reports, statements and records created by other people without those individuals appearing personally to testify. Judge Graf overruled most of those objections, reflecting the substantially lower evidentiary threshold governing a Utah preliminary hearing, whose purpose was only to determine whether probable cause existed to send Robinson to trial rather than whether prosecutors could prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. One significant exception involved an edited compilation of surveillance footage, which Graf declined to admit in that form and required prosecutors to replace with the underlying unedited material. Hull’s testimony also revealed the scope of the prosecution’s surveillance theory: investigators claimed Robinson had appeared on or around the UVU campus multiple times on September 10 and that they were attempting to stitch those appearances together into a continuous identification of the alleged shooter. By the end of day one, prosecutors had established the killing itself, the medical cause of Kirk’s death, the existence and authenticity of substantial video evidence and the beginnings of their effort to identify Robinson as the person captured in that footage. They had not yet presented many of the pieces expected to become more consequential later in the hearing, including the rifle and DNA evidence, Robinson’s alleged communications and admissions, and testimony concerning his roommate Lance Twiggs.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74465117Mon, 24 Aug 2026 16:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciDay one of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing on July 6, 2026, largely centered on prosecutors beginning to construct a timeline of Charlie Kirk’s killing at Utah Valley University and establishing the authenticity of the surveillance footage and...
The defense spent much of the first day attacking the manner in which the prosecution was getting its evidence into the record rather than attempting to disprove the entire prosecution theory at that stage. Kathryn Nester and Robinson’s attorneys repeatedly raised hearsay, foundation and authentication objections, arguing that investigators were being permitted to introduce reports, statements and records created by other people without those individuals appearing personally to testify. Judge Graf overruled most of those objections, reflecting the substantially lower evidentiary threshold governing a Utah preliminary hearing, whose purpose was only to determine whether probable cause existed to send Robinson to trial rather than whether prosecutors could prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. One significant exception involved an edited compilation of surveillance footage, which Graf declined to admit in that form and required prosecutors to replace with the underlying unedited material. Hull’s testimony also revealed the scope of the prosecution’s surveillance theory: investigators claimed Robinson had appeared on or around the UVU campus multiple times on September 10 and that they were attempting to stitch those appearances together into a continuous identification of the alleged shooter. By the end of day one, prosecutors had established the killing itself, the medical cause of Kirk’s death, the existence and authenticity of substantial video evidence and the beginnings of their effort to identify Robinson as the person captured in that footage. They had not yet presented many of the pieces expected to become more consequential later in the hearing, including the rifle and DNA evidence, Robinson’s alleged communications and admissions, and testimony concerning his roommate Lance Twiggs.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>705breakingnews,charliekirk,charliekirkcase,charliekirkmurder,charliekirkshooting,charliekirktrial,courtwatch,crimenews,deathpenalty,justiceforcharliekirk,legalnews,politicalviolence,preliminaryhearing,trialwatch,truecrime,tylerrobinson,tylerrobinsontrial,utahcourt,utahvalleyuniversity,uvutruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-the-experts-behind-the-case-against-bryan-kohberger-part-5-8-24-26--74596938Eric Seat was one of the Idaho State Police Forensic Services scientists identified by prosecutors as a potential expert witness in the case against Bryan Kohberger. His anticipated testimony centered on DNA testing, specifically Y-STR analysis, a method that examines genetic markers on the Y chromosome and can be useful when male DNA is present in a mixture or when traditional autosomal DNA testing has limitations. Defense attorneys complained that the State’s initial disclosure concerning Seat was far too vague, saying prosecutors had pointed them toward a laboratory report without clearly identifying Seat’s ultimate conclusions or explaining exactly how Y-STR testing had been used. That dispute mattered because Kohberger’s attorneys were preparing their own DNA experts and argued they needed to know precisely what Seat intended to say in order to adequately challenge his methodology, findings and interpretation.


T. Paulette Sutton occupied a very different role. Sutton was a highly experienced forensic scientist and bloodstain-pattern analyst retained by the prosecution to examine the blood evidence inside 1122 King Road and reconstruct aspects of what occurred during the murders. Her work addressed the location, distribution and characteristics of bloodstains, including transfer stains, the absence or presence of drip trails and what those patterns could reveal about movement inside the house. Sutton issued an original report in August 2024 and later revised it after reviewing additional defense material and correcting references between crime-scene markers and laboratory evidence numbers. Her conclusions became especially important because the defense retained crime-scene reconstruction experts who challenged portions of the State’s interpretation of the scene. Sutton therefore was positioned not simply to describe blood evidence, but to rebut defense theories about how the killings unfolded and whether the physical evidence supported those alternative reconstructions.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74596938Mon, 24 Aug 2026 14:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciEric Seat was one of the Idaho State Police Forensic Services scientists identified by prosecutors as a potential expert witness in the case against Bryan Kohberger. His anticipated testimony centered on DNA testing, specifically Y-STR analysis, a...Eric Seat was one of the Idaho State Police Forensic Services scientists identified by prosecutors as a potential expert witness in the case against Bryan Kohberger. His anticipated testimony centered on DNA testing, specifically Y-STR analysis, a method that examines genetic markers on the Y chromosome and can be useful when male DNA is present in a mixture or when traditional autosomal DNA testing has limitations. Defense attorneys complained that the State’s initial disclosure concerning Seat was far too vague, saying prosecutors had pointed them toward a laboratory report without clearly identifying Seat’s ultimate conclusions or explaining exactly how Y-STR testing had been used. That dispute mattered because Kohberger’s attorneys were preparing their own DNA experts and argued they needed to know precisely what Seat intended to say in order to adequately challenge his methodology, findings and interpretation.


T. Paulette Sutton occupied a very different role. Sutton was a highly experienced forensic scientist and bloodstain-pattern analyst retained by the prosecution to examine the blood evidence inside 1122 King Road and reconstruct aspects of what occurred during the murders. Her work addressed the location, distribution and characteristics of bloodstains, including transfer stains, the absence or presence of drip trails and what those patterns could reveal about movement inside the house. Sutton issued an original report in August 2024 and later revised it after reviewing additional defense material and correcting references between crime-scene markers and laboratory evidence numbers. Her conclusions became especially important because the defense retained crime-scene reconstruction experts who challenged portions of the State’s interpretation of the scene. Sutton therefore was positioned not simply to describe blood evidence, but to rebut defense theories about how the killings unfolded and whether the physical evidence supported those alternative reconstructions.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>716bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/james-comer-rejects-leon-black-s-bid-to-narrow-epstein-inquiry-8-24-26--74480536House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer threatened billionaire Leon Black with contempt of Congress if he continued resisting the committee’s investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. The dispute intensified after Black’s voluntary June appearance ended after roughly an hour when lawmakers from both parties said he refused to answer questions about nondisclosure agreements. Comer then issued subpoenas requiring Black to produce all NDAs to which he was a party and to return for a formal deposition. Black had produced one agreement and indicated he was willing to provide another, but his lawyers also sought assurances that he would not be held in contempt, tried to convert the subpoenaed deposition into a voluntary interview, attempted to narrow questioning to only those agreements, and sought to delay the September 3 appearance until October. Comer rejected those efforts, accusing Black of trying to dictate the scope of the investigation rather than comply with it.


The confrontation carried additional weight because Black had one of the most extensive documented financial relationships with Epstein among the billionaire’s wealthy associates. Epstein provided tax and estate-planning services to Black from 2012 through 2017, years after Epstein’s 2008 conviction, and Black ultimately paid him roughly $170 million. Black maintained that he did not know about Epstein’s broader criminal activity until 2019, although he acknowledged knowing about Epstein’s earlier conviction involving a minor. Comer argued that Black could not unilaterally decide which confidentiality agreements were relevant, noting that even NDAs signed after Epstein’s death could potentially involve Epstein victims. Black’s attorney, Susan Estrich, rejected the committee’s position as a political “witch hunt,” but Comer made the stakes clear: if Black failed to produce responsive documents or appear for his September 3 deposition, the committee was prepared to use contempt proceedings and other enforcement tools against him.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

Epstein client Leon Black threatened with contempt by House panel chair | House of Representatives | The Guardian




Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74480536Mon, 24 Aug 2026 12:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciHouse Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer threatened billionaire Leon Black with contempt of Congress if he continued resisting the committee’s investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. The dispute intensified after Black’s voluntary June appearance...House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer threatened billionaire Leon Black with contempt of Congress if he continued resisting the committee’s investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. The dispute intensified after Black’s voluntary June appearance ended after roughly an hour when lawmakers from both parties said he refused to answer questions about nondisclosure agreements. Comer then issued subpoenas requiring Black to produce all NDAs to which he was a party and to return for a formal deposition. Black had produced one agreement and indicated he was willing to provide another, but his lawyers also sought assurances that he would not be held in contempt, tried to convert the subpoenaed deposition into a voluntary interview, attempted to narrow questioning to only those agreements, and sought to delay the September 3 appearance until October. Comer rejected those efforts, accusing Black of trying to dictate the scope of the investigation rather than comply with it.


The confrontation carried additional weight because Black had one of the most extensive documented financial relationships with Epstein among the billionaire’s wealthy associates. Epstein provided tax and estate-planning services to Black from 2012 through 2017, years after Epstein’s 2008 conviction, and Black ultimately paid him roughly $170 million. Black maintained that he did not know about Epstein’s broader criminal activity until 2019, although he acknowledged knowing about Epstein’s earlier conviction involving a minor. Comer argued that Black could not unilaterally decide which confidentiality agreements were relevant, noting that even NDAs signed after Epstein’s death could potentially involve Epstein victims. Black’s attorney, Susan Estrich, rejected the committee’s position as a political “witch hunt,” but Comer made the stakes clear: if Black failed to produce responsive documents or appear for his September 3 deposition, the committee was prepared to use contempt proceedings and other enforcement tools against him.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

Epstein client Leon Black threatened with contempt by House panel chair | House of Representatives | The Guardian




Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>687epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-the-full-court-push-for-dismissal-8-24-26--74585499Bryan Kohberger’s defense spent much of the pretrial period trying to dismantle the indictment by arguing that the grand jury process was legally defective and that the evidence presented to jurors was not sufficient to support the charges. His attorneys filed multiple motions attacking different aspects of the indictment, including claims that the grand jury had been improperly instructed on the standard of proof, that prosecutors had relied on inadmissible or misleading evidence, that exculpatory information had not been adequately presented, and that there were problems with the way the grand jury itself had been selected. At one point, the defense said it had identified roughly two dozen separate flaws in the indictment process. Kohberger’s lawyers also argued that the grand jury should have been required to find probable cause under a more demanding standard than prosecutors had used, and they sought access to extensive grand jury materials in an effort to support those challenges.

Prosecutors rejected those arguments and maintained that the indictment had been properly obtained, that the grand jury had been correctly instructed, and that the defense was attempting to impose requirements that Idaho law did not recognize. The state emphasized that a grand jury proceeding was not a trial and that prosecutors were not required to present every piece of potentially favorable evidence or prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt before obtaining an indictment. Judge John Judge ultimately denied Kohberger’s major motions to dismiss, finding that the defense had not demonstrated misconduct, a substantial violation of the jury-selection process, or any other defect serious enough to invalidate the charges. The rulings left the indictment intact and forced the defense to shift its focus away from trying to eliminate the case entirely and toward challenging the state’s evidence, expert testimony, DNA analysis, cellphone records and other components of the prosecution’s case as trial approached.











to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com










Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74585499Mon, 24 Aug 2026 10:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBryan Kohberger’s defense spent much of the pretrial period trying to dismantle the indictment by arguing that the grand jury process was legally defective and that the evidence presented to jurors was not sufficient to support the charges. His...Bryan Kohberger’s defense spent much of the pretrial period trying to dismantle the indictment by arguing that the grand jury process was legally defective and that the evidence presented to jurors was not sufficient to support the charges. His attorneys filed multiple motions attacking different aspects of the indictment, including claims that the grand jury had been improperly instructed on the standard of proof, that prosecutors had relied on inadmissible or misleading evidence, that exculpatory information had not been adequately presented, and that there were problems with the way the grand jury itself had been selected. At one point, the defense said it had identified roughly two dozen separate flaws in the indictment process. Kohberger’s lawyers also argued that the grand jury should have been required to find probable cause under a more demanding standard than prosecutors had used, and they sought access to extensive grand jury materials in an effort to support those challenges.

Prosecutors rejected those arguments and maintained that the indictment had been properly obtained, that the grand jury had been correctly instructed, and that the defense was attempting to impose requirements that Idaho law did not recognize. The state emphasized that a grand jury proceeding was not a trial and that prosecutors were not required to present every piece of potentially favorable evidence or prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt before obtaining an indictment. Judge John Judge ultimately denied Kohberger’s major motions to dismiss, finding that the defense had not demonstrated misconduct, a substantial violation of the jury-selection process, or any other defect serious enough to invalidate the charges. The rulings left the indictment intact and forced the defense to shift its focus away from trying to eliminate the case entirely and toward challenging the state’s evidence, expert testimony, DNA analysis, cellphone records and other components of the prosecution’s case as trial approached.











to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com










Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2456bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-the-state-of-idaho-clash-over-a-continuance-8-24-26--74585498
The State of Idaho opposed the continuance and argued that Kohberger had not demonstrated good cause or shown that proceeding on schedule would actually prejudice his defense. Prosecutors emphasized that Kohberger had been in custody since December 2022, his attorneys had possessed substantial portions of the evidence for a lengthy period, and the defense had already received considerable time and accommodations to prepare. The state also invoked the interests of the victims’ families and the public in bringing the case to trial without another major delay. Hippler ultimately agreed with prosecutors, ruling on June 26, 2025 that the defense had failed to establish either good cause for postponement or a threat to Kohberger’s substantial rights sufficient to justify moving the trial. He also rejected the argument that delaying proceedings would necessarily solve the publicity problem, reasoning that additional time could simply expose prospective jurors to even more reporting and speculation. The trial therefore remained on essentially the same schedule, with jury selection set to begin August 4 and opening statements anticipated for August 18.


to contact me:


bobbyapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74585498Mon, 24 Aug 2026 08:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBryan Kohberger’s defense asked Judge Steven Hippler to postpone the scheduled August 2025 trial, arguing that the extraordinary size and complexity of the case had left his attorneys without enough time to adequately prepare. The defense pointed to...
The State of Idaho opposed the continuance and argued that Kohberger had not demonstrated good cause or shown that proceeding on schedule would actually prejudice his defense. Prosecutors emphasized that Kohberger had been in custody since December 2022, his attorneys had possessed substantial portions of the evidence for a lengthy period, and the defense had already received considerable time and accommodations to prepare. The state also invoked the interests of the victims’ families and the public in bringing the case to trial without another major delay. Hippler ultimately agreed with prosecutors, ruling on June 26, 2025 that the defense had failed to establish either good cause for postponement or a threat to Kohberger’s substantial rights sufficient to justify moving the trial. He also rejected the argument that delaying proceedings would necessarily solve the publicity problem, reasoning that additional time could simply expose prospective jurors to even more reporting and speculation. The trial therefore remained on essentially the same schedule, with jury selection set to begin August 4 and opening statements anticipated for August 18.


to contact me:


bobbyapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>3201bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-sarah-ransome-the-allegations-about-epstein-tapes-and-the-editorial-8-23-26--74585526Sarah Ransome described surviving Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell’s trafficking operation as only the beginning of another ordeal, arguing that adult survivors were routinely disbelieved, blamed and dismissed precisely because they were not children when they were exploited. Ransome said she was 22 when she was drawn into Epstein and Maxwell’s world and described the operation as calculated and highly organized, with vulnerable young women manipulated through promises, coercion and psychological control. She wrote that afterward she encountered relentless skepticism from people around her, lawyers and law enforcement, with her age repeatedly used to minimize what had happened to her. That treatment, she argued, amounted to a second form of abuse: survivors were expected to explain why they did not leave sooner, why they did not immediately report what happened, or why they did not publicly identify every person they believed was involved, while facing the enormous resources of wealthy and well-connected people determined to protect themselves.

Ransome also argued that the Epstein scandal could not be understood simply by focusing on Epstein and Maxwell while ignoring the broader network of powerful people and institutions that allowed them to operate for years. She described the 2007–2008 resolution of the federal investigation as particularly devastating, pointing to the extraordinary deal that protected Epstein from federal prosecution and extended protection to potential co-conspirators as an example of a system that failed survivors while accommodating the powerful. Maxwell’s conviction and sentencing gave Ransome a measure of vindication, but she made clear that she did not consider the pursuit of accountability finished. Her central message was that survivors should not have to meet an arbitrary standard of age, behavior or perceived perfection before being believed, and that genuine justice required examining not only the people who committed the abuse but also those who enabled, protected or ignored the operation around them.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74585526Mon, 24 Aug 2026 06:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciSarah Ransome described surviving Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell’s trafficking operation as only the beginning of another ordeal, arguing that adult survivors were routinely disbelieved, blamed and dismissed precisely because they were not...Sarah Ransome described surviving Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell’s trafficking operation as only the beginning of another ordeal, arguing that adult survivors were routinely disbelieved, blamed and dismissed precisely because they were not children when they were exploited. Ransome said she was 22 when she was drawn into Epstein and Maxwell’s world and described the operation as calculated and highly organized, with vulnerable young women manipulated through promises, coercion and psychological control. She wrote that afterward she encountered relentless skepticism from people around her, lawyers and law enforcement, with her age repeatedly used to minimize what had happened to her. That treatment, she argued, amounted to a second form of abuse: survivors were expected to explain why they did not leave sooner, why they did not immediately report what happened, or why they did not publicly identify every person they believed was involved, while facing the enormous resources of wealthy and well-connected people determined to protect themselves.

Ransome also argued that the Epstein scandal could not be understood simply by focusing on Epstein and Maxwell while ignoring the broader network of powerful people and institutions that allowed them to operate for years. She described the 2007–2008 resolution of the federal investigation as particularly devastating, pointing to the extraordinary deal that protected Epstein from federal prosecution and extended protection to potential co-conspirators as an example of a system that failed survivors while accommodating the powerful. Maxwell’s conviction and sentencing gave Ransome a measure of vindication, but she made clear that she did not consider the pursuit of accountability finished. Her central message was that survivors should not have to meet an arbitrary standard of age, behavior or perceived perfection before being believed, and that genuine justice required examining not only the people who committed the abuse but also those who enabled, protected or ignored the operation around them.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2725epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-katherine-ramsland-and-bryan-kohberger--74585118Katherine Ramsland was one of Bryan Kohberger’s professors at DeSales University in Pennsylvania, where he studied psychology and later earned a master’s degree in criminal justice before beginning his doctoral program at Washington State University. Ramsland was particularly notable because her academic specialty was forensic psychology and extreme offenders; she had written extensively about serial killers and had worked directly with Dennis Rader, the BTK killer, on a book about his crimes and psychology. Kohberger took multiple courses with Ramsland, including classes dealing with forensic psychology, death investigations and antisocial or violent behavior. She later described him as an engaged, intense and curious student who appeared genuinely interested in research and a career in criminology, and said that she had not observed obvious warning signs suggesting that he was capable of committing the murders for which he was later convicted.

Their relationship drew enormous attention after Kohberger’s arrest because of the disturbing overlap between the subjects he had studied and the crimes he was accused of committing. Ramsland’s work with BTK fueled speculation that Kohberger might somehow have communicated with Rader through her, but Rader later denied having any contact with Kohberger, and no evidence established such a connection. Ramsland initially declined to discuss her former student publicly while the criminal case was pending, but after Kohberger pleaded guilty in 2025 she said his arrest had initially shocked her because the student she remembered had not presented himself as violent or threatening. She also acknowledged wrestling with the uncomfortable question of whether anything in the material she taught could have influenced him, while emphasizing that studying violent offenders is a legitimate part of forensic education and does not make instructors responsible for what a student later does. Their actual documented relationship was therefore that of professor and student, but Ramsland’s expertise in serial murder and Kohberger’s intense academic interest in criminal behavior made that relationship one of the more unsettling coincidences surrounding his background.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com









Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74585118Mon, 24 Aug 2026 04:30:04 +0000Bobby CapucciKatherine Ramsland was one of Bryan Kohberger’s professors at DeSales University in Pennsylvania, where he studied psychology and later earned a master’s degree in criminal justice before beginning his doctoral program at Washington State University....Katherine Ramsland was one of Bryan Kohberger’s professors at DeSales University in Pennsylvania, where he studied psychology and later earned a master’s degree in criminal justice before beginning his doctoral program at Washington State University. Ramsland was particularly notable because her academic specialty was forensic psychology and extreme offenders; she had written extensively about serial killers and had worked directly with Dennis Rader, the BTK killer, on a book about his crimes and psychology. Kohberger took multiple courses with Ramsland, including classes dealing with forensic psychology, death investigations and antisocial or violent behavior. She later described him as an engaged, intense and curious student who appeared genuinely interested in research and a career in criminology, and said that she had not observed obvious warning signs suggesting that he was capable of committing the murders for which he was later convicted.

Their relationship drew enormous attention after Kohberger’s arrest because of the disturbing overlap between the subjects he had studied and the crimes he was accused of committing. Ramsland’s work with BTK fueled speculation that Kohberger might somehow have communicated with Rader through her, but Rader later denied having any contact with Kohberger, and no evidence established such a connection. Ramsland initially declined to discuss her former student publicly while the criminal case was pending, but after Kohberger pleaded guilty in 2025 she said his arrest had initially shocked her because the student she remembered had not presented himself as violent or threatening. She also acknowledged wrestling with the uncomfortable question of whether anything in the material she taught could have influenced him, while emphasizing that studying violent offenders is a legitimate part of forensic education and does not make instructors responsible for what a student later does. Their actual documented relationship was therefore that of professor and student, but Ramsland’s expertise in serial murder and Kohberger’s intense academic interest in criminal behavior made that relationship one of the more unsettling coincidences surrounding his background.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com









Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>1192bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-bryan-kohberger-and-the-cell-records--74585116Prosecutors in the Bryan Kohberger case planned to use his cellphone records as a central part of the timeline they said placed him in and around Moscow before and after the murders. According to the probable-cause materials, investigators obtained historical records for Kohberger’s phone and analyzed which cellular towers and sectors handled his device at different times. The state alleged that his phone had used resources providing coverage to the King Road area on multiple occasions before November 13, 2022, including late-night and early-morning periods, which prosecutors intended to use as circumstantial evidence that Kohberger had previously traveled near the victims’ home. On the night of the killings, the phone allegedly left the Pullman area, stopped reporting to the cellular network during the critical window surrounding the murders, and then reconnected south of Moscow afterward. Prosecutors sought to combine those records with surveillance footage of a white Hyundai Elantra moving through Pullman and Moscow to argue that Kohberger’s phone and vehicle followed a route consistent with travel to and from the crime scene.

The state’s theory did not depend on claiming that tower data could pinpoint Kohberger inside the King Road house. Instead, prosecutors planned to present the cellphone evidence as one part of a larger circumstantial mosaic alongside vehicle sightings, DNA, surveillance video and Kohberger’s movements. They also relied on an FBI Cellular Analysis Survey Team examination to interpret the records and reconstruct the phone’s general movements, while the defense challenged how much precision could legitimately be drawn from that analysis. Kohberger’s attorneys emphasized that cellular records identify broad coverage areas rather than exact locations and argued that the prosecution risked overstating what the technology could prove. The battle therefore centered on the difference between using the records to establish a general travel pattern and using them to imply precise presence near the victims’ home, with prosecutors maintaining that the phone data became powerful when viewed together with the rest of the evidence.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74585116Mon, 24 Aug 2026 02:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciProsecutors in the Bryan Kohberger case planned to use his cellphone records as a central part of the timeline they said placed him in and around Moscow before and after the murders. According to the probable-cause materials, investigators obtained...Prosecutors in the Bryan Kohberger case planned to use his cellphone records as a central part of the timeline they said placed him in and around Moscow before and after the murders. According to the probable-cause materials, investigators obtained historical records for Kohberger’s phone and analyzed which cellular towers and sectors handled his device at different times. The state alleged that his phone had used resources providing coverage to the King Road area on multiple occasions before November 13, 2022, including late-night and early-morning periods, which prosecutors intended to use as circumstantial evidence that Kohberger had previously traveled near the victims’ home. On the night of the killings, the phone allegedly left the Pullman area, stopped reporting to the cellular network during the critical window surrounding the murders, and then reconnected south of Moscow afterward. Prosecutors sought to combine those records with surveillance footage of a white Hyundai Elantra moving through Pullman and Moscow to argue that Kohberger’s phone and vehicle followed a route consistent with travel to and from the crime scene.

The state’s theory did not depend on claiming that tower data could pinpoint Kohberger inside the King Road house. Instead, prosecutors planned to present the cellphone evidence as one part of a larger circumstantial mosaic alongside vehicle sightings, DNA, surveillance video and Kohberger’s movements. They also relied on an FBI Cellular Analysis Survey Team examination to interpret the records and reconstruct the phone’s general movements, while the defense challenged how much precision could legitimately be drawn from that analysis. Kohberger’s attorneys emphasized that cellular records identify broad coverage areas rather than exact locations and argued that the prosecution risked overstating what the technology could prove. The battle therefore centered on the difference between using the records to establish a general travel pattern and using them to imply precise presence near the victims’ home, with prosecutors maintaining that the phone data became powerful when viewed together with the rest of the evidence.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>896bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/murder-in-moscow-the-balancing-act-between-the-victims-families-rights-and-kohbergers--74535962

The expansion quickly raised First Amendment concerns, with legal and media experts questioning whether the court had gone too far in restricting attorneys who represented victims rather than the prosecution or the accused. Critics argued that preventing those lawyers from speaking could reduce public scrutiny of the criminal justice process and indirectly restrict the press by cutting off important sources of information. Supporters of tight restrictions could point to Kohberger’s right to a fair trial and the extraordinary pretrial publicity surrounding the case, but experts noted that gag orders were not necessarily effective at neutralizing publicity and that restricting victims’ representatives was considerably more unusual than limiting prosecutors and defense lawyers. The controversy therefore became an early example of the difficult balance in the Kohberger case between protecting an impartial jury and preserving the victims’ families’ ability to speak publicly about a prosecution that had already become a national media phenomenon.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74535962Mon, 24 Aug 2026 00:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn January 2023, Magistrate Judge Megan Marshall expanded the gag order in Bryan Kohberger’s murder case so that it applied not only to prosecutors, defense attorneys and law enforcement, but also to attorneys representing witnesses, victims and...

The expansion quickly raised First Amendment concerns, with legal and media experts questioning whether the court had gone too far in restricting attorneys who represented victims rather than the prosecution or the accused. Critics argued that preventing those lawyers from speaking could reduce public scrutiny of the criminal justice process and indirectly restrict the press by cutting off important sources of information. Supporters of tight restrictions could point to Kohberger’s right to a fair trial and the extraordinary pretrial publicity surrounding the case, but experts noted that gag orders were not necessarily effective at neutralizing publicity and that restricting victims’ representatives was considerably more unusual than limiting prosecutors and defense lawyers. The controversy therefore became an early example of the difficult balance in the Kohberger case between protecting an impartial jury and preserving the victims’ families’ ability to speak publicly about a prosecution that had already become a national media phenomenon.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>970bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/six-epstein-survivors-band-together-to-sue-the-epstein-estate-part-3-8-23-26--74553502Six women who said they had been sexually abused and trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein filed a new lawsuit in New York against Epstein’s estate and its co-executors, Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn. The women brought their claims under New York City’s Gender-Motivated Violence Act and alleged that Indyke and Kahn were not merely passive professionals handling Epstein’s affairs, but important parts of the financial and legal infrastructure that allowed his operation to continue. The complaint described Kahn as functioning as a de facto financial manager for Epstein’s trafficking enterprise, while alleging that Indyke handled cash withdrawals and other transactions that helped keep money moving through Epstein’s network. It also pointed to the enormous compensation both men received from Epstein and Epstein-controlled entities, alleging that Indyke was paid more than $16 million and Kahn more than $10 million over the course of their relationships with him.

The lawsuit sought compensatory and punitive damages and argued that the women continued to suffer financial, physical and psychological harm from Epstein’s abuse. It also placed renewed focus on the role of the people who managed Epstein’s money, legal affairs and estate, rather than treating his trafficking operation as something he ran completely by himself. Indyke and Kahn strongly denied knowingly facilitating or participating in Epstein’s abuse, arguing through counsel that neither man had been accused of committing or witnessing sexual abuse and that no victim had told them about Epstein’s conduct at the time. The new case arrived against the backdrop of earlier litigation involving the estate and its executors, including a separate 2026 settlement in which the estate, Indyke and Kahn agreed to pay $35 million to resolve claims involving at least 40 Epstein survivors.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74553502Sun, 23 Aug 2026 22:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciSix women who said they had been sexually abused and trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein filed a new lawsuit in New York against Epstein’s estate and its co-executors, Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn. The women brought their claims under New York City’s...Six women who said they had been sexually abused and trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein filed a new lawsuit in New York against Epstein’s estate and its co-executors, Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn. The women brought their claims under New York City’s Gender-Motivated Violence Act and alleged that Indyke and Kahn were not merely passive professionals handling Epstein’s affairs, but important parts of the financial and legal infrastructure that allowed his operation to continue. The complaint described Kahn as functioning as a de facto financial manager for Epstein’s trafficking enterprise, while alleging that Indyke handled cash withdrawals and other transactions that helped keep money moving through Epstein’s network. It also pointed to the enormous compensation both men received from Epstein and Epstein-controlled entities, alleging that Indyke was paid more than $16 million and Kahn more than $10 million over the course of their relationships with him.

The lawsuit sought compensatory and punitive damages and argued that the women continued to suffer financial, physical and psychological harm from Epstein’s abuse. It also placed renewed focus on the role of the people who managed Epstein’s money, legal affairs and estate, rather than treating his trafficking operation as something he ran completely by himself. Indyke and Kahn strongly denied knowingly facilitating or participating in Epstein’s abuse, arguing through counsel that neither man had been accused of committing or witnessing sexual abuse and that no victim had told them about Epstein’s conduct at the time. The new case arrived against the backdrop of earlier litigation involving the estate and its executors, including a separate 2026 settlement in which the estate, Indyke and Kahn agreed to pay $35 million to resolve claims involving at least 40 Epstein survivors.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>478epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/six-epstein-survivors-band-together-to-sue-the-epstein-estate-part-2-8-23-26--74553501Six women who said they had been sexually abused and trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein filed a new lawsuit in New York against Epstein’s estate and its co-executors, Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn. The women brought their claims under New York City’s Gender-Motivated Violence Act and alleged that Indyke and Kahn were not merely passive professionals handling Epstein’s affairs, but important parts of the financial and legal infrastructure that allowed his operation to continue. The complaint described Kahn as functioning as a de facto financial manager for Epstein’s trafficking enterprise, while alleging that Indyke handled cash withdrawals and other transactions that helped keep money moving through Epstein’s network. It also pointed to the enormous compensation both men received from Epstein and Epstein-controlled entities, alleging that Indyke was paid more than $16 million and Kahn more than $10 million over the course of their relationships with him.

The lawsuit sought compensatory and punitive damages and argued that the women continued to suffer financial, physical and psychological harm from Epstein’s abuse. It also placed renewed focus on the role of the people who managed Epstein’s money, legal affairs and estate, rather than treating his trafficking operation as something he ran completely by himself. Indyke and Kahn strongly denied knowingly facilitating or participating in Epstein’s abuse, arguing through counsel that neither man had been accused of committing or witnessing sexual abuse and that no victim had told them about Epstein’s conduct at the time. The new case arrived against the backdrop of earlier litigation involving the estate and its executors, including a separate 2026 settlement in which the estate, Indyke and Kahn agreed to pay $35 million to resolve claims involving at least 40 Epstein survivors.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74553501Sun, 23 Aug 2026 20:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciSix women who said they had been sexually abused and trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein filed a new lawsuit in New York against Epstein’s estate and its co-executors, Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn. The women brought their claims under New York City’s...Six women who said they had been sexually abused and trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein filed a new lawsuit in New York against Epstein’s estate and its co-executors, Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn. The women brought their claims under New York City’s Gender-Motivated Violence Act and alleged that Indyke and Kahn were not merely passive professionals handling Epstein’s affairs, but important parts of the financial and legal infrastructure that allowed his operation to continue. The complaint described Kahn as functioning as a de facto financial manager for Epstein’s trafficking enterprise, while alleging that Indyke handled cash withdrawals and other transactions that helped keep money moving through Epstein’s network. It also pointed to the enormous compensation both men received from Epstein and Epstein-controlled entities, alleging that Indyke was paid more than $16 million and Kahn more than $10 million over the course of their relationships with him.

The lawsuit sought compensatory and punitive damages and argued that the women continued to suffer financial, physical and psychological harm from Epstein’s abuse. It also placed renewed focus on the role of the people who managed Epstein’s money, legal affairs and estate, rather than treating his trafficking operation as something he ran completely by himself. Indyke and Kahn strongly denied knowingly facilitating or participating in Epstein’s abuse, arguing through counsel that neither man had been accused of committing or witnessing sexual abuse and that no victim had told them about Epstein’s conduct at the time. The new case arrived against the backdrop of earlier litigation involving the estate and its executors, including a separate 2026 settlement in which the estate, Indyke and Kahn agreed to pay $35 million to resolve claims involving at least 40 Epstein survivors.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>705epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/six-epstein-survivors-band-together-to-sue-the-epstein-estate-part-1-8-23-26--74553500Six women who said they had been sexually abused and trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein filed a new lawsuit in New York against Epstein’s estate and its co-executors, Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn. The women brought their claims under New York City’s Gender-Motivated Violence Act and alleged that Indyke and Kahn were not merely passive professionals handling Epstein’s affairs, but important parts of the financial and legal infrastructure that allowed his operation to continue. The complaint described Kahn as functioning as a de facto financial manager for Epstein’s trafficking enterprise, while alleging that Indyke handled cash withdrawals and other transactions that helped keep money moving through Epstein’s network. It also pointed to the enormous compensation both men received from Epstein and Epstein-controlled entities, alleging that Indyke was paid more than $16 million and Kahn more than $10 million over the course of their relationships with him.

The lawsuit sought compensatory and punitive damages and argued that the women continued to suffer financial, physical and psychological harm from Epstein’s abuse. It also placed renewed focus on the role of the people who managed Epstein’s money, legal affairs and estate, rather than treating his trafficking operation as something he ran completely by himself. Indyke and Kahn strongly denied knowingly facilitating or participating in Epstein’s abuse, arguing through counsel that neither man had been accused of committing or witnessing sexual abuse and that no victim had told them about Epstein’s conduct at the time. The new case arrived against the backdrop of earlier litigation involving the estate and its executors, including a separate 2026 settlement in which the estate, Indyke and Kahn agreed to pay $35 million to resolve claims involving at least 40 Epstein survivors.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74553500Sun, 23 Aug 2026 18:30:06 +0000Bobby CapucciSix women who said they had been sexually abused and trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein filed a new lawsuit in New York against Epstein’s estate and its co-executors, Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn. The women brought their claims under New York City’s...Six women who said they had been sexually abused and trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein filed a new lawsuit in New York against Epstein’s estate and its co-executors, Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn. The women brought their claims under New York City’s Gender-Motivated Violence Act and alleged that Indyke and Kahn were not merely passive professionals handling Epstein’s affairs, but important parts of the financial and legal infrastructure that allowed his operation to continue. The complaint described Kahn as functioning as a de facto financial manager for Epstein’s trafficking enterprise, while alleging that Indyke handled cash withdrawals and other transactions that helped keep money moving through Epstein’s network. It also pointed to the enormous compensation both men received from Epstein and Epstein-controlled entities, alleging that Indyke was paid more than $16 million and Kahn more than $10 million over the course of their relationships with him.

The lawsuit sought compensatory and punitive damages and argued that the women continued to suffer financial, physical and psychological harm from Epstein’s abuse. It also placed renewed focus on the role of the people who managed Epstein’s money, legal affairs and estate, rather than treating his trafficking operation as something he ran completely by himself. Indyke and Kahn strongly denied knowingly facilitating or participating in Epstein’s abuse, arguing through counsel that neither man had been accused of committing or witnessing sexual abuse and that no victim had told them about Epstein’s conduct at the time. The new case arrived against the backdrop of earlier litigation involving the estate and its executors, including a separate 2026 settlement in which the estate, Indyke and Kahn agreed to pay $35 million to resolve claims involving at least 40 Epstein survivors.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>727epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/alan-dershowitz-says-he-is-anxious-to-testify-after-abrupt-cancellation-of-epstein-hearing-8-22-26--74480539
House Oversight Chairman James Comer made clear that the committee was not satisfied, calling the cancellation “unacceptable” and saying Dershowitz’s lawyers had failed to provide an adequate explanation. Dershowitz’s interview was rescheduled for September 2, with the possibility of a subpoena hanging over the process if he again failed to cooperate. Dershowitz continued to insist that he wanted to testify, but at this point the contradiction was difficult to ignore: he had spent considerable time publicly demanding a forum to tell his story, only to disappear from that forum when it finally materialized. Given his central role on Epstein’s legal team and his involvement in negotiating one of the most controversial prosecution deals in modern American criminal justice, Congress had every reason to demand answers from him. Until he actually appeared, took the oath, and answered substantive questions, his repeated declarations about being “anxious” to testify amounted to little more than promises.






to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Dershowitz says he's 'anxious' to testify on Epstein despite abrupt Oversight Committee cancellation

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74480539Sun, 23 Aug 2026 16:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciAlan Dershowitz said he was still “anxious” to testify before the House Oversight Committee about Jeffrey Epstein, but his eagerness looked considerably less convincing after his scheduled appearance abruptly collapsed. Dershowitz had publicly...
House Oversight Chairman James Comer made clear that the committee was not satisfied, calling the cancellation “unacceptable” and saying Dershowitz’s lawyers had failed to provide an adequate explanation. Dershowitz’s interview was rescheduled for September 2, with the possibility of a subpoena hanging over the process if he again failed to cooperate. Dershowitz continued to insist that he wanted to testify, but at this point the contradiction was difficult to ignore: he had spent considerable time publicly demanding a forum to tell his story, only to disappear from that forum when it finally materialized. Given his central role on Epstein’s legal team and his involvement in negotiating one of the most controversial prosecution deals in modern American criminal justice, Congress had every reason to demand answers from him. Until he actually appeared, took the oath, and answered substantive questions, his repeated declarations about being “anxious” to testify amounted to little more than promises.






to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




source:

Dershowitz says he's 'anxious' to testify on Epstein despite abrupt Oversight Committee cancellation

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>749epstein,epsteinclientlist,epsteincoverup,epsteincoverupcontinues,epsteindidntkillhimself,epsteinfiles,epsteinfilescoverup,epsteinnews,epsteintransparency,epsteintrumpcoverup,ghislainemaxwell,itsacoverup,jeffreyepstein,jeffreyepsteincoverup,maxwell,news,princeandrew,releasethefiles,survivors,theepsteincoveruptruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-the-debate-over-transparency-in-the-kohberger-court-room-8-23-26--74534955Bryan Kohberger’s defense and Idaho prosecutors ultimately found themselves largely on the same side of the fight over cameras in the courtroom, even though their concerns were somewhat different. Kohberger’s attorneys argued that the extraordinary media attention surrounding the case had turned routine court appearances into a spectacle and threatened his right to a fair trial. They accused photographers and broadcasters of repeatedly focusing tightly on Kohberger despite earlier instructions from Judge John Judge to avoid making him the exclusive subject of coverage, and they pointed to sensational headlines and images as evidence that courtroom footage was being used in ways they believed were prejudicial. Prosecutors agreed that unrestricted cameras created serious problems, particularly once the case reached trial and victims’ relatives or sensitive witnesses might testify. In September 2023, the state formally supported removing still and video cameras at least during the trial and during proceedings involving victim testimony, arguing that the intense public attention required greater protection for everyone involved.

The dispute therefore became less of a traditional prosecution-versus-defense battle and more of a fight between the parties and news organizations seeking continued visual access to the proceedings. Media groups argued that cameras promoted transparency and allowed the public to observe one of the most consequential criminal cases in Idaho, while Kohberger’s lawyers maintained that public access did not require permitting cameras capable of producing endless close-ups and viral imagery. Judge Judge initially resisted an outright ban and considered compromises, including moving the camera farther away and using a controlled, wide-angle feed. He eventually granted Kohberger’s request to remove independent media cameras from the courtroom, while preserving public visual access by allowing the court itself to operate cameras and distribute the official feed. The resolution attempted to split the difference: Kohberger and the prosecution received greater control over potentially prejudicial coverage, while the public and press were not completely shut out of seeing the proceedings.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74534955Sun, 23 Aug 2026 14:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBryan Kohberger’s defense and Idaho prosecutors ultimately found themselves largely on the same side of the fight over cameras in the courtroom, even though their concerns were somewhat different. Kohberger’s attorneys argued that the extraordinary...Bryan Kohberger’s defense and Idaho prosecutors ultimately found themselves largely on the same side of the fight over cameras in the courtroom, even though their concerns were somewhat different. Kohberger’s attorneys argued that the extraordinary media attention surrounding the case had turned routine court appearances into a spectacle and threatened his right to a fair trial. They accused photographers and broadcasters of repeatedly focusing tightly on Kohberger despite earlier instructions from Judge John Judge to avoid making him the exclusive subject of coverage, and they pointed to sensational headlines and images as evidence that courtroom footage was being used in ways they believed were prejudicial. Prosecutors agreed that unrestricted cameras created serious problems, particularly once the case reached trial and victims’ relatives or sensitive witnesses might testify. In September 2023, the state formally supported removing still and video cameras at least during the trial and during proceedings involving victim testimony, arguing that the intense public attention required greater protection for everyone involved.

The dispute therefore became less of a traditional prosecution-versus-defense battle and more of a fight between the parties and news organizations seeking continued visual access to the proceedings. Media groups argued that cameras promoted transparency and allowed the public to observe one of the most consequential criminal cases in Idaho, while Kohberger’s lawyers maintained that public access did not require permitting cameras capable of producing endless close-ups and viral imagery. Judge Judge initially resisted an outright ban and considered compromises, including moving the camera farther away and using a controlled, wide-angle feed. He eventually granted Kohberger’s request to remove independent media cameras from the courtroom, while preserving public visual access by allowing the court itself to operate cameras and distribute the official feed. The resolution attempted to split the difference: Kohberger and the prosecution received greater control over potentially prejudicial coverage, while the public and press were not completely shut out of seeing the proceedings.



to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2079bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-s-family-and-the-backlash-due-to-his-arrest-8-23-26--74534954
The fallout illustrated how quickly the notoriety surrounding the Idaho murders spread beyond Kohberger himself and engulfed members of his family who had not been accused of wrongdoing. Reporting at the time described his parents as retired and the household as being in extremely difficult financial circumstances after both daughters became unemployed. Mel later described the experience as confusing and painful, while also making clear that she did not equate her family’s suffering with what the victims’ families had endured. Whatever anyone believed about Bryan Kohberger, the employment consequences suffered by his sisters became an example of guilt by association: two women found their careers disrupted not because authorities accused them of participating in the murders, but because their last name suddenly became inseparable from one of the most notorious criminal cases in the country.


to contact me;


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74534954Sun, 23 Aug 2026 12:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciIn the aftermath of Bryan Kohberger’s December 2022 arrest, reports emerged that both of his sisters suffered serious professional consequences simply because of their relationship to the man accused of murdering Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana...
The fallout illustrated how quickly the notoriety surrounding the Idaho murders spread beyond Kohberger himself and engulfed members of his family who had not been accused of wrongdoing. Reporting at the time described his parents as retired and the household as being in extremely difficult financial circumstances after both daughters became unemployed. Mel later described the experience as confusing and painful, while also making clear that she did not equate her family’s suffering with what the victims’ families had endured. Whatever anyone believed about Bryan Kohberger, the employment consequences suffered by his sisters became an example of guilt by association: two women found their careers disrupted not because authorities accused them of participating in the murders, but because their last name suddenly became inseparable from one of the most notorious criminal cases in the country.


to contact me;


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2259bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/mega-edition-bryan-kohberger-and-the-fight-to-stay-the-proceedings-8-23-26--74534953Bryan Kohberger’s defense asked Judge John Judge to halt proceedings in the summer of 2023 while it investigated whether the grand jury that indicted him had been selected in violation of Idaho law. The first motion came after Kohberger was indicted on May 16, 2023, and his attorneys sought access to the full grand-jury record so they could examine how the panel had been assembled and whether there were grounds to challenge the indictment. The defense relied on Idaho Code § 2-213, which allowed a defendant to seek a stay or even have an indictment quashed if there had been a substantial failure to comply with the state’s jury-selection laws. Judge Judge initially found the request premature, but temporarily stopped the speedy-trial clock for 37 days so Kohberger’s attorneys could obtain and review the grand-jury materials. After that review, the defense renewed its request, arguing that an order had called for 45 prospective grand jurors to appear but only 32 actually reported, and also pointing to alleged inconsistencies in juror questionnaires and answers provided by prospective jurors.


Prosecutors fought the request, arguing that Kohberger had failed to identify any actual, substantial violation of Idaho’s Uniform Jury Selection and Service Act and was effectively asking the court to stop the entire prosecution based on speculation about the grand-jury process. The state maintained that a numerical difference between the number of jurors summoned and those who appeared did not, by itself, establish that the panel had been unlawfully selected, and it accused the defense of searching for a defect rather than demonstrating one. After hearing arguments, Judge Judge ultimately sided with prosecutors and denied Kohberger’s second motion to stay, finding that the defense had not shown the kind of substantial statutory violation necessary to halt the case or disturb the indictment. The court also withdrew the temporary order stopping the speedy-trial clock. The fight was therefore part of a broader defense strategy aimed at attacking the legitimacy of the grand-jury proceedings, but the effort to freeze the prosecution on jury-selection grounds ultimately failed.




to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74534953Sun, 23 Aug 2026 10:30:02 +0000Bobby CapucciBryan Kohberger’s defense asked Judge John Judge to halt proceedings in the summer of 2023 while it investigated whether the grand jury that indicted him had been selected in violation of Idaho law. The first motion came after Kohberger was indicted...Bryan Kohberger’s defense asked Judge John Judge to halt proceedings in the summer of 2023 while it investigated whether the grand jury that indicted him had been selected in violation of Idaho law. The first motion came after Kohberger was indicted on May 16, 2023, and his attorneys sought access to the full grand-jury record so they could examine how the panel had been assembled and whether there were grounds to challenge the indictment. The defense relied on Idaho Code § 2-213, which allowed a defendant to seek a stay or even have an indictment quashed if there had been a substantial failure to comply with the state’s jury-selection laws. Judge Judge initially found the request premature, but temporarily stopped the speedy-trial clock for 37 days so Kohberger’s attorneys could obtain and review the grand-jury materials. After that review, the defense renewed its request, arguing that an order had called for 45 prospective grand jurors to appear but only 32 actually reported, and also pointing to alleged inconsistencies in juror questionnaires and answers provided by prospective jurors.


Prosecutors fought the request, arguing that Kohberger had failed to identify any actual, substantial violation of Idaho’s Uniform Jury Selection and Service Act and was effectively asking the court to stop the entire prosecution based on speculation about the grand-jury process. The state maintained that a numerical difference between the number of jurors summoned and those who appeared did not, by itself, establish that the panel had been unlawfully selected, and it accused the defense of searching for a defect rather than demonstrating one. After hearing arguments, Judge Judge ultimately sided with prosecutors and denied Kohberger’s second motion to stay, finding that the defense had not shown the kind of substantial statutory violation necessary to halt the case or disturb the indictment. The court also withdrew the temporary order stopping the speedy-trial clock. The fight was therefore part of a broader defense strategy aimed at attacking the legitimacy of the grand-jury proceedings, but the effort to freeze the prosecution on jury-selection grounds ultimately failed.




to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com








Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.]]>2301bryankohberger,bryankohbergernews,bryankohbergertrialtracker,bryankohbergertrialupdate,bryankohbergerupdates,ethanchapin,idaho,idahomassacre,idahomurder,idahomurders,idahostudentmassacre,idahostudentmurder,idahostudentsmassacred,idahostudentsmurdered,idahouniversitymurder,idahouniversitymurders,kayleegoncalves,madisonmogen,truecrime,xanakernodletruefull